Attachment C - VPC Summary - GPA-AF-1-22-6.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2022-10-12)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 18117 characters
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3
rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
GPA-AF-1-22-6 
Date of VPC Meeting 
June 27, 2022 
Request From 
Arterial  
Request To 
Arterial, Collector, and Local 
Location 
Chandler Boulevard approximately between the 19th 
and 27th Avenue alignments, and 27th Avenue between 
Chandler Boulevard and the Loop 202 Freeway
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, per the staff recommendation  
VPC Vote 
5-3
VPC DISCUSSION: 
Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of the general plan amendment 
GPA-AF-1-22-6. Ms. Sanchez Luna discussed the location of the site, the requested 
street classification for Chandler Boulevard and 27th Avenue and provided some 
background information on the Street Classification Map. Ms. Sanchez Luna 
summarized the proposed development south of Chandler Boulevard noting the 
different types of residential units and the improvements along Chandler Boulevard. Ms. 
Sanchez Luna informed the committee that eleven letters of opposition had been 
received from the community and that major concerns included the increase in traffic 
within the village, street safety, and emergency vehicle response times. Ms. Sanchez 
Luna concluded the presentation by providing the staff findings and the 
recommendation for approval for the general plan amendment GPA-AF-1-22-6.  
Jennifer Meyers, representing the applicant with Norris Design, provided an overview 
for the proposed general plan amendment GPA-AF-1-22-6. Ms. Meyers informed the 
committee that the name for the proposed development had been changed to Upper 
Canyon and provided the history of the site including the purchase of the site, the 
changes to the Street Classification Map, and the filing for the General Plan 
Amendment for Chandler Boulevard. Ms. Meyers displayed the Loop 202 selected 
alternative that removed 25th Avenue from design and planned the intersection on 17th 
Avenue instead. Ms. Meyers summarized the existing street classifications and street 
conditions for Chandler Boulevard and 27th Avenue and noted that an interchange is 
not planned for 27th Avenue. Ms. Meyers displayed the proposed street classification 
and the street conditions for Chandler Boulevard and 27th Avenue which would include 
parallel parking for adjacent trails and bicycle lanes with detached sidewalks. Ms. 
Meyers summarized their neighborhood outreach and the concerns that they have 
Attachment C

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
GPA-AF-1-22-6 
June 27, 2022 
Page 2 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
received from the public including parallel parking along Chandler Boulevard, speeding 
concerns, and the reduction of lanes in both directions of Chandler Boulevard. Ms. 
Meyers concluded the presentation by displaying the proposed timeline for GPA-AF-1-
22-6 and summarizing the reasons why the general plan amendment was needed for 
the proposed development.   
 
Questions from the committee: 
Darin Fisher stated that he had concerns with the proposed parallel parking along 
Chandler Boulevard and asked the applicant to explain how vehicles would avoid 
opening their car doors into oncoming traffic. Ms. Meyers stated that the bicycle lane 
would act as a buffer on the north side of the road. Mr. Fisher stated that his concern 
was for the other side of the parallel parking spot, the driver would have to open their 
car door on incoming traffic and that it would create a hazardous condition along 
Chandler Boulevard. Ms. Meyers stated that Norris Design had been working with the 
Street Transportation Department and that the parallel parking was requested by the 
Street Transportation Department as an improvement for Chandler Boulevard. Mr. 
Fisher stated that even if the Street Transportation Department requested the parallel 
parking, it would still create a hazard along Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Fisher stated that 
when vehicles leave a parking space, the only direction that drivers would be able to go 
would be west, which would result in a dead-end street. Mr. Fisher asked how U-turns 
would be prevented along Chandler Boulevard. Ms. Meyers stated that she was unable 
to answer that question at this time. Mr. Fisher stated that he wasn’t opposed to the 
additional parking for the adjacent trails, but that the proposed parking design would 
create numerous hazards. Mr. Fisher asked how the community west of the proposed 
development would be better served with the reduction of traffic lanes along Chandler 
Boulevard. Tom Lemon, with the applicant’s team, stated that his team has been 
working with the City of Phoenix for approximately a year and stated that they were 
aware of the proposed street classification designation before purchasing the land and 
stated that they planned to reduce the number of lanes if they had the opportunity to 
purchase the land south of Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Lemon stated that Liberty Lane 
would act as a reliever from Chandler Boulevard and added that Shaughnessy Road, 
located west of Chandler Boulevard, was also built with one lane in each direction and 
one turning lane so Chandler Boulevard as a collector would be compatible with the 
existing road to the west. Mr. Lemon added that Liberty Lane would act as a traffic 
reliever for Chandler Boulevard and stated that the Streets Transportation Department 
requested the 28 parking spaces adjacent to the trail. Mr. Lemon noted that the bicycle 
lane, detached sidewalks, and parallel parking spaces would all benefit the community. 
Jose Castillo, with the applicant’s team, stated that if the road was built with 5 traffic 
lanes rather than the proposed 3, it would cause an increase in vehicle speed and 
stated that the reduction of lanes would reduce the urban heat island effect in the 
Ahwatukee Foothills Village. Mr. Fisher stated that over 300 acres will be used to 
develop housing in the Ahwatukee Foothills Village and as a result, the urban heat 
island effect would still be created. Mr. Fisher stated that traffic will be forced to go 
through Liberty Lane and that traffic will lead into the intersection of 17th Avenue and 
Liberty Lane which is one of the most dangerous traffic intersections within the village. 
Mr. Fisher stated that the reduction of traffic lanes would add to the traffic on 17th

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
GPA-AF-1-22-6 
June 27, 2022 
Page 3 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Avenue and Liberty Lane which would create hazardous street conditions.   
 
Chair Spencer Elliott asked if there had been any traffic studies that indicated which 
time of day would Chandler Boulevard have the most traffic congestion. Chuck Wright, 
with the applicant’s team, displayed the proposed street composition in relation to the 
proposed development and stated that a traffic signalization of 17th Avenue and Liberty 
Lane was part of the development and stated that the people would still take the 
shortest route and added that traffic through Chandler Boulevard and Liberty Lane 
would be the same since one is not shorter than the other. Mr. Wright also stated that 
people coming out of the freeway would most likely use Liberty Lane rather than 
Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Wright stated that there are still two different methods to go 
west within Ahwatukee Foothills which would be on Chandler Boulevard and Liberty 
Lane.  
 
Mr. Fisher asked what the proposed time frame would be from the full development of 
the proposed residential development south of Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Lemon stated 
that it would depend on the housing market conditions and stated that the developer 
would like to break ground either at the end of 2022 or and the beginning of 2023 and 
stated that it would take about four years for the completion of the proposed residential 
development. Mr. Fisher stated that there would be an active construction zone and 
stated that this would also add to the traffic on the west portion of the village. Mr. 
Lemon stated that the construction traffic will utilize the same street as the rest of the 
community and added that the first phase of improvements would be on Liberty Lane 
and 27th Avenue. Mr. Lemon stated that a traffic control plan will be used to ensure that 
traffic moves smoothly along Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Fisher asked if there will be a 
safety issue with construction equipment having to drive along Chandler Boulevard in 
addition to the parallel parking. Mr. Lemon stated that there is a potential hazard but 
added that the trails are primarily used during the weekends rather than during typical 
work hours and stated that the existing parking condition is not suitable for Chandler 
Boulevard and that the parallel parking spots reduce unsafe parking along the road.   
 
Public Comments:  
Doug McBane stated that he would like the committee to recommend denial of the 
proposed GPA-AF-1-22-6 and stated that the PCD has not been updated accordingly 
over the passage of time. Mr. McBane stated that there are no local services that would 
serve the community and stated that the proposed development would result in over 
11,000 additional daily trips that are not commute related and as a result, it would 
increase traffic from Upper Canyon to Desert Foothills. In addition, Mr. McBane added 
that the proposed development would increase the surrounding noise pollution, traffic, 
and carbon emissions. Mr. McBane stated that he would like to hear about the impact 
on the neighborhoods east of the proposed development and noted that the proposed 
housing density is not consistent with the surrounding area and requests that the 
proposed development have a less density. Mr. McBane concluded his public comment 
by stating that he is not opposed to development but would appreciate a lower density 
designation and for the development to be built at a reasonable rate. Ms. Meyers stated 
that they understood the lack of services and stated that the PCD originally planned

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
GPA-AF-1-22-6 
June 27, 2022 
Page 4 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
over 300 additional homes north of Chandler Boulevard and stated that this would no 
longer be built. Ms. Meyers added that the impact fees will assist the situation with the 
fire station, water, sewer, and streets as part of the developer’s responsibility. Mr. 
Lemon stated that the concerns have been taken into consideration and noted that this 
is an infill site and that the proposed development is ensuring numerous improvements 
and that he understands that services would be needed. Mr. McBane asked for 
clarification on what discussions the applicant has had with the City of Phoenix. Mr. 
Lemon stated that the applicant’s team has been in contact with the fire department 
and that the development proposal gets routed to the Police Department as well as all 
the departments within the City. Mr. Lemon noted that through numerous discussions 
with the City they have been able to modify the proposed development to have 
numerous benefits to the Ahwatukee Foothills Village. Mr. McBane stated that the 
nearest grocery store was Safeway and added that even with the proposed residential 
units, the citizens of Ahwatukee Foothills will still utilize Chandler Boulevard rather than 
Liberty Lane. Mr. McBane added that the proposed development is not supportive of the 
current community conditions and that this would negatively impact the residents east of 
the development.  
 
Michael Buzinski stated that there were contradictions with what was proposed by the 
City in 2016. Mr. Buzinski stated that in 2016, the City of Phoenix stated that 27th 
Avenue was no longer an option for an intersection to Loop 202 and stated that 
whoever purchased the land south of Chandler Boulevard would be required to build the 
road as an arterial. Mr. Buzinski stated that the residential development west of 19th 
Avenue had a single entry point along Chandler Boulevard and added that this has 
become a concern due to the lack of emergency vehicle response within that 
neighborhood. Mr. Buzinski concluded his public comment by stating that the proposed 
residential development would add to the traffic congestion and would significantly 
reduce street safety at the proposed intersections and that any high-density 
development would increase traffic congestion even more than single-family residential 
homes. Mr. Wright stated that there are significant improvements on Liberty Lane and 
Chandler Boulevard and that both would act as different channels for traffic. Mr. 
Buzinski stated the proposed improvements would not benefit the residents that have 
lived in the area since Pecos Road was removed as an alternative access point. Mr. 
Wright stated that the current street capacity was at 50 percent and that having 
Chandler Boulevard built as an arterial would not benefit the community since the street 
capacity and the demand should match one another. Mr. Buzinski asked if the 
applicant had any comment on the reduction of the speed limit on Chandler Boulevard. 
Mr. Wright stated that he would let City staff answer the question. Ms. Sanchez Luna 
stated that the applicant has been working with the Street Transportation Department 
and stated that she would reach out to their department to get clarification on the 
proposed speed limit for Chandler Boulevard and contact Mr. Buzinski at a later date.  
 
Committee Discussion:  
Max Masel stated that the Committee has been discussing this proposal for over two 
hours and that he appreciated that the applicant has been working with the City of 
Phoenix regarding the proposed development and that this has been a vision of

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
GPA-AF-1-22-6 
June 27, 2022 
Page 5 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Ahwatukee Foothills since approximately 1982. Mr. Masel stated that he would like to 
make a motion to approve the general plan amendment request.  
 
Motion:  
Max Masel motioned to recommend approval of GPA-AF-1-22-6 per the staff 
recommendation. Jerry Youhanaie seconded the motion.  
 
Chair Elliott stated that he would like additional parking to be provided at the trails in 
addition to the ones that will be provided along Chandler Boulevard.  
 
Mr. Fisher stated that he understood that there had been a lot of discussion between 
the applicant and the City of Phoenix and stated that this at first glance should be a 
simple request but with the addition of neighborhood meetings, letters of opposition, and 
today’s public comments it had been clear that this was not a simple request. Mr. Fisher 
stated that he would like Committee Member Masel to amend his motion.  
 
Mike Maloney asked for clarification on the motion language. Mr. Masel stated that the 
motion language could be found in the request within the agenda that was presented to 
the committee prior to the meeting. Mr. Maloney stated that the language would be in 
Agenda Item No. 4.  
 
Chair Elliott stated that the motion could be amended to include other information  
Mr. Fisher stated that Committee Member Masel has not amended his motion.  
Chair Elliot stated that he appreciated the transparency between the applicant and the 
Committee and that he would like the Planning Commission to consider additional 
parking for the trail heads other than what is proposed with the general plan 
amendment. Mr. Fisher stated that a motion was already presented, and that the 
Committee had to vote on it. Mr. Masel stated that stipulations could not be added to 
general plan amendments. Chair Elliot added that the committee could add comments 
or recommendations. Ms. Sanchez Luna stated that general plan amendments do not 
have any stipulations but stated that the Village Planning Committee Recommendation 
Forms had a section for staff comments where certain comments could be given to the 
Planning Commission. Chair Elliot asked the committee if there were any comments 
that they would like to add in addition to the parking comment that he had proposed. 
Chair Elliott stated that he would like additional parking to be provided at the trails in 
addition to the ones that will be provided along Chandler Boulevard.  
 
Martha Neese requested that the motion be read again. Mr. Maloney stated that the 
motion was to recommend approval to amend the General Plan Street Classification 
Map on Chandler Boulevard approximately between the 19th Avenue and 27th Avenue 
alignments, and 27th Avenue between Chandler Boulevard and the Loop 202 Freeway 
from an Arterial to Local, Collector, and Arterial.  
 
Vote:  
5-3, Motion to approve passed, with Committee Members, Masel, Meier, Youhanaie 
Gasparro, and Elliott, in favor and Committee Members Fisher, Neese, and Maloney in

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
GPA-AF-1-22-6 
June 27, 2022 
Page 6 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
opposition.  
 
Vice Chair Andrew Gasparro asked staff if they had received any additional speaker 
cards or any more registrations to speak besides the two citizens that provided their 
public comments. Ms. Sanchez Luna stated that staff had received numerous letters of 
opposition, but that those were provided in the staff report and that there were only two 
people who had registered to speak which were the two individuals that provided their 
public comment.