Attachment B - Routing Packet - PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7.pdf

PLEASE RESPOND ELECTRONICALLY TO DANIELLE JORDAN 2ND FLOOR, 602-495-0383 
To: 
Departments Concerned 
Date: April 21, 2021 
From: 
Alan Stephenson 
Planning & Development Department Director 
Subject:   P.H.O. APPLICATION NO. PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7  – Notice of Pending Actions  
 by the Planning Hearing Officer 
1.
Your attention is called to the fact that the Planning Hearing Officer will
consider the following case at a public hearing on May 19, 2021.
2.
Information about this case is available for review at the Zoning Counter in
the Planning and Development Department on the 2nd Floor of Phoenix City
Hall, telephone 602-262-7131, Option 6.
3.
Staff, please indicate your comments and respond electronically to
pdd.pho@phoenix.gov or you may provide hard copies at the Zoning Counter
in the Planning and Development Department on the second floor of Phoenix
City Hall by April 28, 2021.
DISTRIBUTION
Mayor’s Office (Lisa Fernandez), 11th Floor 
City Council (Matthew Heil), 11th Floor 
Aviation (Sheldon Daisley)
CED (Michelle Pierson), 20th Floor 
Fire Prevention (Aaron Conway), 2nd Floor
Light Rail (Joel Carrasco/Special TOD Only)   
Neighborhood Services (Gregory Gonzales, Lisa Huggins), 4th Floor 
Parks & Recreation (Natasha Hughes), 16th Floor 
Public Transit (Kathryn Boris)
Public Works (Ray Dovalina, Kristina Jensen, Elise Moore, Rudy Rangel), 5th Floor 
Street Transportation Department (Maja Brkovic, Alan Hilty, Chris Kowalsky), 5th Floor 
Street Transportation - Ped. Safety Coordinator (Mailen Pankiewicz), 5th Floor 
Water Services (Don Reynolds, Victor Romo), 8th Floor
Planning and Development (Alan Stephenson, Joshua Bednarek), 3rd Floor 
Planning and Development/Information Services (Ben Ernyei, Andrew Wickhorst), 4th 
Floor
Planning and Development/Historic Preservation Office (Kevin Weight), 3rd Floor 
Planning Hearing Officer (Tricia Gomes, Adam Stranieri, Danielle Jordan), 2nd Floor 
Village Planner (Enrique Bojorquez-Gaxiola, Estrella Village) 
Village Planning Committee Chair (Mark Cardenas, Estrella Village)
Attachment B

200 W Washington Street, 2nd Floor * Phoenix, Arizona 85003 * Tel: (602) 262-7131 * Fax: (602) 495-3793
APPLICATION FOR PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION
APPLICATION NO: PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Council District: 7   
   
Request For: 
Stipulation Modification
    Reason for Request:   Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding minimum landscape adjacent to any public street.   Modification of
Stipulation 4 regarding general conformance to the site plan date stamped November 20, 1995.   Technical corrections to
Stipulations 2 and 5.  
   
Owner
Applicant
Representative
Glenda D. Massey
Taylor C. Earl, Earl and Curley, P.C.
Taylor C. Earl, Earl and Curley, P.C.
P. O. Box 330
3101 North Central Avenue, Suite 1000
3101 North Central Avenue, Suite 1000
Waddell AZ 85355
Phoenix AZ 85012
Phoenix AZ 85012
(602) 265-0094
(602) 265-0094
P: (602) 265-0094  F: (602) 265-2195
tearl@earlcurley.com                    
tearl@earlcurley.com                    
tearl@earlcurley.com                    
     Property Location: Northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road
                                                                                                                         
  
Zoning Map: E-5
Quarter Section: 7-15
APN: 104-39-003N
Acreage: 1.7
  
Village: Estrella  
Last Hearing: CC RATIFICATION
Previous Opposition: No
Date of Original City Council Action: 12/06/1995 
Previous PHO Actions: 
Zoning Vested: A-1                 
Supplemental Map No.: 1037
Planning Staff: 075891    
      An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized
substantive policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicable
review time frames, please call 602-262-7131 (option 6), email zoning.mailbox@phoenix.gov or visit our website at
http://phoenix.gov/pdd/licensetimes.html.
   A Filing Fee had been paid to the City Treasurer to cover the cost of processing this application. The fee will be retained to cover
the cost whether or not the request is granted
   
Fee 
Fee Waived
Fee Date
Receipt
Purpose
$1,080.00
$0.00
03/25/2021
21-0026176
Original Filing Fee
   
Signature of Applicant: _____________________________________________________         DATE: ___________________
   
Hearing Results
   
Planning Hearing Officer
Planning Commission
City Council
Date: 05/19/2021 10 AM
Date:
Date:
Appealed?:
Appealed?:
Action:
Action:
Action:

March 25, 2021 
 
Mr. Adam Stranieri 
Planning Hearing Officer 
City of Phoenix Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
RE: 
PHO Request Z-9-08-7 and Z-67-95-7 
Justification Narrative 
 
 
Northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road 
 
 
 
Dear Mr. Stranieri, 
 
Our firm represents Sun State Builders (“Sun State”), which is seeking to purchase the +/- 13.6 
acres located at the northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road to develop a spec 
shell office/warehouse building on a property that has remained vacant for decades.  The proposed 
changes to the site plan and elevations will result in a beautiful and modern facility that will be an 
asset to this area. Sun State is one of the elite and experienced builders in the Valley and will bring 
its expertise to this project.  
 
Background 
 
The City's General Plan land use map designates this site as “Industrial.”  The property is zoned 
A-1 and A-2 (see below).  The subject site is a single parcel with two different zoning districts. 
The southwest corner of the property is zoned A-1 and was part of the larger 40 acre rezoning case, 
approved by the City Council on February 21, 1996 (Z-67-95).

2 | P a g e 
 
 
Approval of the 1996 zoning case (Z-67-95) was subject to 5 stipulations.  Stipulation 4 of that 
approval required that development be general conformance to the site plan dated November 20, 
1995. It also included stipulations regarding landscape widths and right-of-way dedications. 
 
Subsequently, on June 4, 2008, a request to rezone approximately 13.81 acres of the larger 40-acre 
zoning case from A-1 to A-2 was approved by the City Council to allow a truck and tank repair 
facility. The zoning site plan showed a 42,000 square foot building placed near the center of the 
site. That building was to be used for commercial truck tank servicing and repair. There was also 
a second building along 59th Avenue frontage.  That building consisted of approximately 27,000 
square feet and was shown to be located approximate 102 feet east of the 59th Ave right-of-way. 
That building was to be used for office with minor flex/storage space. The overall site plan showed 
truck parking on the southern portion of the site along Lower Buckeye Road.  It also showed a 
“Lot 2” (or the A-1 zoning parcel) being located at the southwest corner of the overall property.  
Lot 2 was not part of this 2008 rezoning case.  
 
Approval of the 2008 zoning case (Z-9-08-7) was subject to 8 stipulations. Stipulation 1 of that 
approval requires that the development be in general conformance with the site plan and elevations 
date stamped February 5, 2008 as approved or modified by the Development Services Department. 
 
Each of the two zoning cases was approved with its own set of site plan and elevations stipulations.  
This request seeks to create a singular set of zoning stipulations for this subject site to allow the 
remaining parts of these two zoning cases to be developed.   It also seeks to modify the landscape 
setback on 59th Avenue due changed circumstances since the stipulations were implemented.  
 
Request 
 
Because each zoning case requires general conformance to a separate site plan and elevations it 
makes development of this site challenging. This request seeks PHO approval to replace both site 
plan and elevation stipulations with a single and new site plan and elevation stipulations.  All other 
stipulations, except those noted below, will remain.  This PHO requests only applies to Stipulations 
1 and 4 in zoning case Z-67-95 (and only to approximately the southern half of the land originally 
within that zoning case) and Stipulations 1 and 1a in zoning case Z-9-08-7.  Specifically, this 
request seeks to: 
 
1) Modify Stipulation 1 in zoning case Z-67-95, which requires a minimum landscape 
setback adjacent to any public street. 
2) Modify Stipulation 4 in zoning case Z-67-95, which requires general conformance to a 
site plan. 
3) Modify Stipulation 1 in zoning case Z-9-08-7, which requires general conformance to a 
site plan and elevations. 
4) Modify Stipulation 1.a in zoning case Z-9-08-7, which requires landscape setback widths 
as show on the site plan and surrounding Lot 2.

3 | P a g e 
 
 
Zoning Case Z-67-95 - Stipulation No.1 
Current Wording. 
That a minimum 30-foot landscape setback (as per Section 626 of the Zoning Ordinance) be 
provided adjacent to any public street.  
 
Proposed Wording. 
That a minimum 30-foot landscape setback (as per Section 626 of the Zoning Ordinance) be 
provided adjacent to any public street Lower Buckeye Road.  
 
Rational: 
This modification seeks to retain the 30’ landscape setback along Lower Buckeye Road. But along 
59th Avenue, we are seeking to revert the standard back to the landscape standards applicable to 
A-1/A-2 (they are the same). Along Lower Buckeye Road a multi-use trail is required, so that 30’ 
makes sense. But along 59th Avenue, changed circumstances no longer justify augmenting the 
typical standard.  
 
We believe the A-1/A-2 standard are entirely adequate to address this situation.  This is exactly 
the situation those standards were designed to address. Unless there is a good reason to augment 
development standards in a particular case, the development standards of a particular zoning 
district should remain unaltered. We can understand why this augmentation was originally 
required, but the justifications for such increase do not exist anymore.  
 
When the 1996 A-1 case was approved (which applies to the SWC of the site), the site plan was 
more of a plat map, showing lot lines (see below).  
 
 
 
It did not show specific building footprints or suggest a type of industrial use. Under that open-
ended approval, the site could have been developed with some of the more intense A-1 uses or

4 | P a g e 
 
 
outdoor storage. That potential is reason enough to require an increased landscape setback. But 
that open-ended potential no longer exists because we are proposing a typical warehouse building 
with the service functions being located in the rear of the property. Our site plan, which we would 
be stipulated to, would ensure these constraints. By eliminating the question mark on how the site 
would be used, the “just in case” landscape increase is no longer justified.   
 
In other words, the project we are proposing is a very standard A-1 development.  There is nothing 
about our proposed use that requires an increase in the A-1/A-2 landscape requirements that have 
successfully been used for decades on hundreds of industrial projects in the City. 
 
When the larger portion of our site was rezoned to A-2, that could have been a reason to seek an 
increased setback. After all, A-2 allows for greater intensity than A-1. But that too has been 
eliminated with our proposal. What we are proposing fits comfortably within A-1, again 
eliminating a need for increased landscape setbacks.  
 
Looking at external characteristics to the site, we see another reason why 30’ was justified back 
when both the A-1 and the A-2 rezoning cases were approved—but which now is no longer true.  
Back then, the west side of 59th Avenue had no freeway, and it was zoned for large-lot residential 
(i.e. RE-35). When transitioning from industrial to large-lot residential, even across an arterial, an 
increase in the landscaping setback is entirely justified.  
 
 
 
But since that time, the 202 freeway has been developed across the street.  Now, the only land 
between the subject site and the freeway is freeway right-of-way and land owned by a utility.1  
 
1 The two parcels on the hard NWC are owned by SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR IMP POWER DIST and SALT 
RIVER VALEY WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, respectively.

5 | P a g e 
 
 
Completely eliminated is any potential for the land on the west side of 59th Avenue being 
developed with residential. Thus, the need for increased landscape standards to buffer such a 
potential residential use are also gone.  
 
Finally, consider that the use of 59th Avenue in this area has been dramatically and forever altered 
with the freeway. When these two zoning cases were approved, 59th Avenue between Lower 
Buckeye Road and Buckeye Road was used by the full spectrum of drivers, including residents 
living in the area. With the opening of the freeway, nearly all drivers using this stretch of 59th 
Avenue would only be those accessing sites between Lower Buckeye Rd. and Buckeye Rd. and 
all of those sites are zoned industrial (A-1, A-2 or Ind-2 (Maricopa County)). If there were any 
sensitivities to the use of this stretch of roadway by the common public, those concerns are all but 
eliminated.  
 
 
 
Zoning Case Z-67-95 - Stipulation No.4 
Current Wording. 
That development be general conformance to the site plan dated November 20, 1995. 
 
Proposed Wording. 
That development be general conformance to the site plan dated November 20, 1995 MARCH xx, 
2021. 
 
Rational: 
This stipulation is being modified to allow for a new site plan.  This stipulation requires 
development to be in general conformance to a site plan dated November 20, 1995. In review of

6 | P a g e 
 
 
the City’s records that site plan appears to more like a subdivision plan or a plat map that shows 
lots rather than building locations.  The rezoning was for 40-acres and most of the 40 acres have 
been developed, except for property at the southwest corner of the subject site.  Because the 
majority of the 40-acre zoning case have already been developed, this request merely seeks to 
modify the stipulation to allow a single cohesive site plan. 
 
 
Zoning Case Z-9-08-7 - Stipulation No.1 
Current Wording. 
That the development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and elevations date 
stamped February 5, 2008, as approved or modified by the Development Services Department with 
specific regard to the following: 
 
Proposed Wording. 
That the development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and elevations date 
stamped February 5, 2008March xx, 2021, as approved or modified by the Development Services 
Department with specific regard to the following: 
 
Rational: 
This stipulation is being modified to allow for a new site plan and elevations for a new use.  This 
stipulation requires development to be in general conformance to a site plan and elevations dated 
stamped February 5, 2008. In review of the City’s records the zoning site plan and elevation were 
specifically designed for a “diesel truck/tanker repair” facility that was being proposed at the time 
of the rezoning.  No development has occurred, and the property has remained vacant and 
undeveloped for decades.  Now Sun State Builders seeks to develop this site with an approximately 
248,000 spec building.  The new building fronts onto Lower Buckeye Road and sides to 59th 
Avenue with all service functions being located on the north side of the building.  Truck parking 
is located internal to the site whereas the previous site plan allowed truck parking along Lower 
Buckeye Road.  The truck court is screened by walls and gates.  The new site plan shows regular 
vehicle parking along both 59th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road.  The revised elevations are 
specific to the new building design being proposed.   
 
We believe the new proposed site plan provides a better site plan layout than the previous site plan.  
The new site plan places the service functions internal to the site away from public view.  
Furthermore, we believe the new elevations provide more architectural interest and a better 
streetscape.  Indeed, the previous site plan and the new proposed site plans and elevations are 
different, but the changes are warranted and justified. The elevations use color, score lines, varying 
wall heights and various material to create a well design architecturally pleasing building.  These 
changes are an enhancement over the previous plans.     
 
 
Zoning Case Z-9-08-7 - Stipulation No.1.a. 
Current Wording. 
Landscape setback widths as shown on the site plan and the inclusion of a minimum 20 foot wide 
landscape setback surrounding lot 2.

7 | P a g e 
 
 
Proposed Wording. 
That a minimum 30-foot landscape setback (as per Section 626 of the Zoning Ordinance) be 
provided adjacent to Lower Buckeye Road.  
 
Rational: 
The stipulation was originally in place because Lot 2 was an A-1 one being surrounded on the east 
and north by a A-2 rezoning case. But now Lot 2 is being developed together with the rest of the 
subject property, and this stipulation no longer makes sense. The rest of our modification is 
intended to echo the landscape stipulation discussed earlier. The rational discussed there would 
apply here as well.  
 
Conclusion 
 
The previous zoning cases stipulated to old site plans and elevations. But no development has 
occurred, and the site has remained vacant since the zoning cases were approved. Now a new 
developer, with a proven track record, seeks to develop the site with an attractive building.  The 
site plan has been redesigned that internalize service and truck parking away from the public street 
and public view.  We believe this solution is better visually. 
 
With regard to the landscaping on 59th Avenue, the justifications for increasing the standard have 
gone away with the changes to our site plan and the changes to the area. There is no longer any 
reason to deviate from the typical standard.  
 
There is no question this development will be a positive for the community, bringing an attractive 
development and more jobs.  The adjustment being requested are minor and will not negatively 
affect the zoning approval in any significant way. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
Taylor C. Earl 
Partner 
  
o  (602) 265-0094 
tearl@earlcurley.com 
 
 
 
O:\INDEX\Sun State Builders\59th Ave. & Lower Buckeye\Docs\PHO Justification Letter (FINAL)_3.25.2021.docx

TC
TC

W LOWER BUCKEYE RD
S 59TH AVE
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
Planning & Development Department
PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Property Location: Northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road
0
160
320
80
Feet ´

W LOWER BUCKEYE RD
S 59TH AVE
RE-35
A-1*
CP/GCP*
A-1*
A-1*
A-2*
A-1*
Planning & Development Department
PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Property Location: Northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road
0
160
320
80
Feet ´

E
APN:  104-39-007
OWNER:  METRO AUTO AUCTION, INC.
APN:  104-39-003C
OWNER:  XTRA LEASE, INC.
PROPOSED BUILDING
(248,188 S.F.)
BLDG. HGT. :
F.F.E.:
38
38
12
12
12
6
12
8
12
12
12
12
7
673'-0"
5'-0"
40'-0"
VARIES
5'-0"
18'-0"
25'-0"
VARIES
60'-0"
104'-6"
50'-0"
40'-0"
60'-0"
40'-0"
60'-0"
18'-0"
8'-0"
40'-0"
60'-0"
40'-0"
60'-0"
40'-0"
60'-0"
5'-0"
7'-0"
50'-0"
4'-6"
40'-0"
32'-0"
18'-0"
28'-0"
18'-0"
42'-0"
11'
5' 11' 11' 5'
42'-6"
12'-0"
102'-0"
10'-0"
102'-0"
15'-0"
102'-0"
8'-0"
102'-0"
15'-0"
34'-0"
11' 5' 11' 5' 11' 16'-0" 5' 8'
102'-0"
9'-0"
51'-0"
18'-0"
102'-0"
9'-0"
102'-0"
9'-0"
102'-0"
18'-0"
18'-0"
102'-0"
8'-0"
102'-0"
8'-0"
102'-0"
8'-0"
101'-6"
22'-6"
12'
18'-0"
26'-0"
18'-0"
350'-0"
85'-0"
50'-0"
50'-0"
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
EX. FH
EX. FH
EX. FH
50'-0"
R.O.W.
28
7
5
6
29
7
1
2
8
6
9
6
11
11
14
15
9'
6'
15'-6"
9'
6'
15'-6"
7
1
2
8
6
9
14
15
3
5
6
11
10
8
10
13
13
10
6
25
8
19
17
18
24
8
20
25
6
6
26
10'
10'
24'-0"
21
10'
30'
26
10'
10'
24'-0"
30°
30°
20
27
20
16
25
25
40'-0"
76'-0"
48'-0"
6
6
17
24
6
5
4
2
4
2
4
2
8
8
9
12
12
12
12
9
6
10
6
A-1 ZONING
A-1 ZONING
R-35 ZONING
A-1 ZONING
A-1 ZONING
A-1 ZONING
C/P GCD ZONING
26'-0"
13'-0"
5'-0"
30'-0"
40'-0"
110'-0"
5'-0"
40'-0"
5'-0"
30'-0"
MUTE
30'-0"
MUTE
10'-0"
10'-0" MULTI-USE TRAIL
10'-0"
10'-0" MULTI-USE TRAIL
RO RI
RO
 RI
10
10'
5'
SCALE:
SITE PLAN
1" = 40'-0"
0
SCALE:
120
80
40
40
1" = 40'
SCALE:
VICINITY MAP
SITE
W. LOWER BUCKEYE RD.
S. 59th AVENUE
 FREEWAY
S. 55th AVENUE
202
GENERAL SITE NOTES
1.
Development and use of this site shall conform to all
applicable codes and ordinances.
2.
Structures and landscaping within a triangle measured
back 10' from the property line and 20' along the property
line on each side of driveway entrances will be maintained
at a maximum height of 3'-0".
3.
Owners of property adjacent to the public right of way will
have the responsibility for maintaining all landscaping
within the right of way in accordance with approved plans.
4.
All new or relocated utilities will be placed underground.
5.
Any on-site lighting will be placed so as to direct light away
from adjacent   residential districts and will not exceed one
foot candle at the property line.  No noise, odor or vibration
will be emitted so that it exceeds the general level of noise,
odor or vibration emitted by uses outside of site.
6.
All rooftop equipment and satellite dishes shall be
screened to the height of the tallest equipment.
7.
Plans shall reflect all existing improvements at proposed
site.  Obstructions to proposed improvements in the right
of way shall be removed or relocated in kind before
beginning construction.
8.
All on-site water lines, including those required for fire
protection shall be private plumbing lines subject to the
Phoenix Plumbing Code.
9.
All new sanitary sewer lines within the site shall be private
plumbing lines subject to the Phoenix Plumbing Code or
the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Aquifer Protection Program (APP) General Permit 4.01 in
accordance with Arizona Administrative Code Title 18,
Chapter 9, Section E301 (AAC R18-9-E301) whichever is
applicable.
10.
After final approval the project will be inspected for zoning
compliance during   construction and prior to occupancy.
The applicant is to notify PDD prior to occupancy to
arrange for inspections.  Call 602-262-6981 and request a
site Inspection.
11.
All service areas shall be screened to conceal trash
containers, 
loading 
docks, 
transformers, 
backflow
preventers and other mechanical or electrical equipment
from eye level adjacent to all public streets.
12.
All signage requires separate approvals and permits.
13. Explosive 
or 
hazardous 
processes 
(if 
applicable):
Certification shall be provided by the Phoenix Fire
Department Prevention Bureau that all manufacturing,
storage and waste processes on the site shall meet safety
and environmental standards as administered by the
Bureau.
14.
The developer shall update all existing off-street
improvements (sidewalks, curb ramps and driveways) to
current ADA guidelines.
15.
Replace all existing broken or out-of-grade curb and
sidewalks on and in the ROW adjacent to the site. If new
or existing concrete is damaged during construction
process, it must also be replaced prior to final approval
of the site.
16.
This project is located in the City of Phoenix Water
Services Area and has been designated as having an
assured water supply.
17.
Landscaping shall be maintained by a permanent and
automatic irrigation system to minimize maintenance and
water consumption.
18.
All existing broken, or out of grade curb and sidewalk on
the project sire will need to be replaced, as well as any
new curb or sidewalk damaged during construction.
19.
Update all existing off-site street improvements
(sidewalks, curb ramps and driveways) to current ADA
guidlines
I consent to the reproduction of this site plan for the purpose of
future amendments provided that if modifications are made, the
architect that makes such changes assumes full responsibility
and liability for the plan.
_____________________________
_______________
Signature of Copyright Owner
Date
ROBERT B. WINTON
Print Name of Copyright Owner
04/05/21
SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
1.
Existing concrete sidewalk
2.
Existing concrete vertical curb and gutter
3.
New curb cut per Civil drawings
4.
New concrete sidewalk per COP Standards
5.
10' x 20' visibility triangle
6.
6” concrete curb
7.
3'-0” high, 8” cmu screen wall per details, sheet SP-2
8.
Asphalt pavement per civil drawings
PROJECT DATA
ADDRESS:
ZONING:
A-1
APN:
104-39-003N
PARCEL SIZE:
Gross = 672,874 SF (Acres)
Net = 592,319 SF ( Acres)
BUILDING AREA:
2 spec offices= 4,436 SF
Warehouse= 243,694 SF
Total= 248,130 SF
LOT COVERAGE:
248,130/592,319= 41.9%
BUILDING HEIGHT AT RIDGE:
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB, (ESFR System)
ALLOWABLE AREA:
Unlimited area with 60' yards all sides
OCCUPANCY:
S1
PARKING REQUIRED:
Warehouse- 243,694/2000= 122
Offices- 4436/300= 15
Total= 137
PARKING PROVIDED:
171 Spaces
ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED: 6 Spaces
ACCESSIBLE SPACES PROVIDED: 6 Spaces
OFF STREET LOADING REQUIRED: 10' x 30'
OFF STREET LOADING PROVIDED: 26 Spaces
LANDSCAPE REQUIRED:
179 x 450 x 5%= 4,050 SF
(Parking Lot)
LANDSCAPE PROVIDED:
5,096 SF
(Parking lot)
OWNER:
Chamberlain Development
1050 W. Washington St #214
Tempe, AZ
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL:
Robert Winton
wintonarch@gmail.com 
PROJECT NARRATIVE
This project is a spec shell office/warehouse building for two possible tenants. The
secured trucking yard is at the back side of this building and vehicular parking at the
two street sides. The building is concrete tilt up with panelized metal canopies at he
entrance popping up and out. Some have different textures and accent the two corner
office entrances. The colors are the corporate colors of our client. The docks are hidden
with the corners popped out as a screen on both sides
9.
4” wide white parking stripes
10.
4” concrete sidewalk with score joints at 5'-0” oc maximum
11.
Ramp up 1:12 maximum slope. Provide score joints per
2010 ADA Standards
12.
6” (2500 psi) concrete with score joints at 5'-0” oc
13.
Accessible signage per detail, Sheet SP-2
14.
Accessible symbol painted on the pavement per detail,
Sheet SP-2
15.
4” wide yellow painted diagonal striping at 24” oc and at
the perimeter
16.
Existing 3' cmu and wrought iron fencing
17.
6'-0” high, 8” cmu wall per details, Sheet SP-2
18.
40'-0” x 6'-0” opaque sliding gate. Gate to be 2” x 3” tube
steel with metal deck infill. Provide FD Knox Box
19.
6'-0” high wrought iron fencing
20.
6'-0” high 'Dooley'  block wall per detail, Sheet SP-2
21.
6” x 5'-0” wide concrete (3500 psi) apron flush with finish
floor and adjacent pavement
22.
Concrete tilt up retaining wall with 1 ½” diameter steel pipe
guardrail on top to +3'-6” above finish grade
23.
Concrete truckwell per civil and structural drawings
24.
Concrete pavement per civil drawings
25.
Retention area
26.
Double trash pad per detail, Sheet SP-2
27.
Existing chain link fencing
28.
33' x 33' visibility triangle
LB
SP-1
drawn
job no.
revisions
date
approved
FAX (602) 265-9739
(602) 230-9778
1110 E. Missouri Ave., Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85014
winton architects, inc.
RBW
21106
3/25/21
59th AVENUE & LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
NEW BUILDING / WAREHOUSE FOR:
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
SUN STATE BUILDERS
KIVA NO.:
SDEV NO.:
PAPP NO.:
Q.S. NO.:
SCMJ NO.:
LSPL NO.:
C:\Projects\2021\21106 59th & LOWER BUCKEYE\21106 SP-1.dwg, 3/25/2021 11:19:38 AM, DWG To PDF.pc3, 1:1
PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Proposed Site Plan
Hearing Date: May 19, 2021

SCALE:
SOUTH ELEVATION - WEST HALF
1/16" = 1'-0"
49'-0"
14'-0"
1'-6"
13'-6"
17'-0"
3'-0"
7'-2"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
13'-0"
13'-0"
A
2
2
17
1
2
4
2
3
2
17
18 
6
6
B
C
B
C
C
C
C
B
A
D
7
B
7
B
B
C
C
B
C
C
5
D
B
C
C
SCALE:
SOUTH ELEVATION - EAST HALF
1/16" = 1'-0"
49'-0"
14'-0"
1'-6"
13'-6"
17'-0"
3'-0"
7'-2"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
13'-0"
13'-0"
A
2
2
17
1
2
4
2
3
2
17
18 
6
6
B
C
B
C
C
C
C
B
A
D
7
B
7
B
B
C
C
B
C
C
5
D
B
SCALE:
WEST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"
49'-0"
14'-0"
1'-6"
13'-6"
17'-0"
3'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
7'-2"
46'-0"
13'-0"
13'-0"
A
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
17
2
4
5
D
6
B
C
A
C
C
C
7
B
B
C
B
7
B
B
B
C
D
D
C
C
B
B
6
B
C
B
B
A
C
B
EXTERIOR PAINT COLORS
(Paint to be Sherwin Williams, UNO)
A.
Extra White
 SW7006, 257-C1
B.
Reflection, 
SW7661, 233-C1
C.
Web Gray,
 SW7075, 235-C6
D.
Stolen Kiss,
 SW7586, 275-C1
EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES
1.
Concrete tilt up wall panels
2.
2” x ½” deep reveal
3.
12' x ½” deep reveal
4.
½”  reveals at 12”oc
5.
Steel column and canopy per details
6.
Fixed insulated glass in clear anodized aluminum frame
(center glazed). Glass to be Sun Guard by Guardian
Glass, super neutral 68 on Gray (“U” value=0.29,
SHGCE 0.25)
7.
Hollow metal door and frame
8.
Steel sectional overhead door with vertical lift
9.
1 ½” diameter steel pipe handrail to be +3'-6” above
finish grade
10.
Steel stairs, landing and handrails per details
11.
Wall pack light fixtures per electrical drawings
12.
Line of roof beyond parapet
13.
Metal downspout
14.
Secondary scupper opening
15.
1'-6” high individually mounted, pan channel, black
anodized aluminum Helvetica medium address numbers
16.
Roof and overflow openings
17.
2” x ½” deep reveal at 3'-0” oc
18.
Knock out panel
MGO
A-3
MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW
drawn
job no.
revisions
date
approved
FAX (602) 265-9739
(602) 230-9778
1110 E. Missouri Ave., Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85014
winton architects, inc.
RBW
21106
2/1/21
59th AVENUE & LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
NEW BUILDING / WAREHOUSE FOR:
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
SUN STATE BUILDERS
MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE
KIVA NO.:
SDEV NO.:
PAPP NO.:
Q.S. NO.:
SCMJ NO.:
LSPL NO.:
PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: May 19, 2021

SCALE:
NORTH ELEVATION - EAST HALF
1/16" = 1'-0"
46'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
13'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
7'-2"
14'-0"
13'-0"
7'-2"
7
B
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
7
B
8
A
8
A
10
C
7
B
8
A
8
A
8
A
C
C
B
B
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
7
B
10
C
2
B
SCALE:
NORTH ELEVATION - WEST HALF
1/16" = 1'-0"
46'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
13'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
7'-2"
14'-0"
13'-0"
10'-0"
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
7
B
8
A
8
A
10 C
7
B
8
A
8
A
8
A
C
C
B
B
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
49'-0"
14'-0"
1'-6"
13'-6"
17'-0"
3'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
7'-2"
46'-0"
13'-0"
13'-0"
SCALE:
EAST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"
A
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
17
2
4
5
D
6
7
B
B
B
C
B
C
C
C
A
C
C
B
D
B
7
B
B
C
B
D
A
C
B
EXTERIOR PAINT COLORS
(Paint to be Sherwin Williams, UNO)
A.
Extra White
 SW7006, 257-C1
B.
Reflection, 
SW7661, 233-C1
C.
Web Gray,
 SW7075, 235-C6
D.
Stolen Kiss,
 SW7586, 275-C1
EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES
1.
Concrete tilt up wall panels
2.
2” x ½” deep reveal
3.
12' x ½” deep reveal
4.
½”  reveals at 12”oc
5.
Steel column and canopy per details
6.
Fixed insulated glass in clear anodized aluminum frame
(center glazed). Glass to be Sun Guard by Guardian
Glass, super neutral 68 on Gray (“U” value=0.29,
SHGCE 0.25)
7.
Hollow metal door and frame
8.
Steel sectional overhead door with vertical lift
9.
1 ½” diameter steel pipe handrail to be +3'-6” above
finish grade
10.
Steel stairs, landing and handrails per details
11.
Wall pack light fixtures per electrical drawings
12.
Line of roof beyond parapet
13.
Metal downspout
14.
Secondary scupper opening
15.
1'-6” high individually mounted, pan channel, black
anodized aluminum Helvetica medium address numbers
16.
Roof and overflow openings
17.
2” x ½” deep reveal at 3'-0” oc
18.
Knock out panel
MGO
A-3.1
drawn
job no.
revisions
date
approved
FAX (602) 265-9739
(602) 230-9778
1110 E. Missouri Ave., Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85014
winton architects, inc.
RBW
21106
2/1/21
59th AVENUE & LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
NEW BUILDING / WAREHOUSE FOR:
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
SUN STATE BUILDERS
MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW
MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE
KIVA NO.:
SDEV NO.:
PAPP NO.:
Q.S. NO.:
SCMJ NO.:
LSPL NO.:
PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: May 19, 2021

SCALE:
SOUTH ELEVATION - WEST HALF
1/16" = 1'-0"
49'-0"
14'-0"
1'-6"
13'-6"
17'-0"
3'-0"
7'-2"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
13'-0"
13'-0"
A
2
2
17
1
2
4
2
3
2
17
18 
6
6
B
C
B
C
C
C
C
B
A
D
7
B
7
B
B
C
C
B
C
C
5
D
B
C
C
SCALE:
SOUTH ELEVATION - EAST HALF
1/16" = 1'-0"
49'-0"
14'-0"
1'-6"
13'-6"
17'-0"
3'-0"
7'-2"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
13'-0"
13'-0"
A
2
2
17
1
2
4
2
3
2
17
18 
6
6
B
C
B
C
C
C
C
B
A
D
7
B
7
B
B
C
C
B
C
C
5
D
B
SCALE:
WEST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"
49'-0"
14'-0"
1'-6"
13'-6"
17'-0"
3'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
7'-2"
46'-0"
13'-0"
13'-0"
A
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
17
2
4
5
D
6
B
C
A
C
C
C
7
B
B
C
B
7
B
B
B
C
D
D
C
C
B
B
6
B
C
B
B
A
C
B
EXTERIOR PAINT COLORS
(Paint to be Sherwin Williams, UNO)
A.
Extra White
 SW7006, 257-C1
B.
Reflection, 
SW7661, 233-C1
C.
Web Gray,
 SW7075, 235-C6
D.
Stolen Kiss,
 SW7586, 275-C1
EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES
1.
Concrete tilt up wall panels
2.
2” x ½” deep reveal
3.
12' x ½” deep reveal
4.
½”  reveals at 12”oc
5.
Steel column and canopy per details
6.
Fixed insulated glass in clear anodized aluminum frame
(center glazed). Glass to be Sun Guard by Guardian
Glass, super neutral 68 on Gray (“U” value=0.29,
SHGCE 0.25)
7.
Hollow metal door and frame
8.
Steel sectional overhead door with vertical lift
9.
1 ½” diameter steel pipe handrail to be +3'-6” above
finish grade
10.
Steel stairs, landing and handrails per details
11.
Wall pack light fixtures per electrical drawings
12.
Line of roof beyond parapet
13.
Metal downspout
14.
Secondary scupper opening
15.
1'-6” high individually mounted, pan channel, black
anodized aluminum Helvetica medium address numbers
16.
Roof and overflow openings
17.
2” x ½” deep reveal at 3'-0” oc
18.
Knock out panel
MGO
A-3
MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW
drawn
job no.
revisions
date
approved
FAX (602) 265-9739
(602) 230-9778
1110 E. Missouri Ave., Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85014
winton architects, inc.
RBW
21106
2/1/21
59th AVENUE & LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
NEW BUILDING / WAREHOUSE FOR:
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
SUN STATE BUILDERS
MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE
KIVA NO.:
SDEV NO.:
PAPP NO.:
Q.S. NO.:
SCMJ NO.:
LSPL NO.:
PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: May 19, 2021

SCALE:
NORTH ELEVATION - EAST HALF
1/16" = 1'-0"
46'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
13'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
7'-2"
14'-0"
13'-0"
7'-2"
7
B
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
7
B
8
A
8
A
10
C
7
B
8
A
8
A
8
A
C
C
B
B
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
7
B
10
C
2
B
SCALE:
NORTH ELEVATION - WEST HALF
1/16" = 1'-0"
46'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
13'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
7'-2"
14'-0"
13'-0"
10'-0"
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
7
B
8
A
8
A
10 C
7
B
8
A
8
A
8
A
C
C
B
B
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
49'-0"
14'-0"
1'-6"
13'-6"
17'-0"
3'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
10'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
8'-0"
12"
10'-0"
1'-6"
12"
12"
12"
7'-2"
46'-0"
13'-0"
13'-0"
SCALE:
EAST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"
A
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
17
2
4
5
D
6
7
B
B
B
C
B
C
C
C
A
C
C
B
D
B
7
B
B
C
B
D
A
C
B
EXTERIOR PAINT COLORS
(Paint to be Sherwin Williams, UNO)
A.
Extra White
 SW7006, 257-C1
B.
Reflection, 
SW7661, 233-C1
C.
Web Gray,
 SW7075, 235-C6
D.
Stolen Kiss,
 SW7586, 275-C1
EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES
1.
Concrete tilt up wall panels
2.
2” x ½” deep reveal
3.
12' x ½” deep reveal
4.
½”  reveals at 12”oc
5.
Steel column and canopy per details
6.
Fixed insulated glass in clear anodized aluminum frame
(center glazed). Glass to be Sun Guard by Guardian
Glass, super neutral 68 on Gray (“U” value=0.29,
SHGCE 0.25)
7.
Hollow metal door and frame
8.
Steel sectional overhead door with vertical lift
9.
1 ½” diameter steel pipe handrail to be +3'-6” above
finish grade
10.
Steel stairs, landing and handrails per details
11.
Wall pack light fixtures per electrical drawings
12.
Line of roof beyond parapet
13.
Metal downspout
14.
Secondary scupper opening
15.
1'-6” high individually mounted, pan channel, black
anodized aluminum Helvetica medium address numbers
16.
Roof and overflow openings
17.
2” x ½” deep reveal at 3'-0” oc
18.
Knock out panel
MGO
A-3.1
drawn
job no.
revisions
date
approved
FAX (602) 265-9739
(602) 230-9778
1110 E. Missouri Ave., Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85014
winton architects, inc.
RBW
21106
2/1/21
59th AVENUE & LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
NEW BUILDING / WAREHOUSE FOR:
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
SUN STATE BUILDERS
MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW
MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE
KIVA NO.:
SDEV NO.:
PAPP NO.:
Q.S. NO.:
SCMJ NO.:
LSPL NO.:
PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: May 19, 2021

EXTERIOR PAINT COLORS 
(Paint to be Sherwin Williams, UNO) 
A.
Extra White SW7006, 257-C 1
8.
Reflection, SW7661, 233-C1
C.
Web Gray, SW7075, 235-C6
' 
D.
Stolen Kiss, SW7586, 275-C1 -
PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Proposed Colors
Hearing Date: May 19, 2021

PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Stipulated Site Plan
Hearing Date: May 19, 2021

City Council Minutes

City Council Minutes

City Council Minutes

City Council Minutes

Planning Commission Minutes

Planning Commission Minutes

Planning Commission Minutes

Planning Commission Minutes