Attachment B - VPC Recommendation - PHO-2-22--Z-48-07-1.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2022-05-25)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 6086 characters
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
PHO-2-22—Z-48-07-1 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
 
April 12, 2022 
Date of Planning Hearing 
Officer Hearing 
 
April 20, 2022 
Request 
 
1) Review of conceptual site plan and elevations per 
Stipulation 1. 
 
2) Technical corrections to Stipulations 2, 3, and 7. 
 
Location 
 
Northeast and southeast corners of I-17 and Arroyo 
Norte Drive 
 
VPC Recommendation 
 
Approval 
VPC Vote 
3-1 with Committee members Lawrence, Riederer, and 
Sommacampagna in favor and Committee member Virgil 
in opposition. 
 
 
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS: 
 
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding the location of the site and the 
surrounding zoning.  She stated that the site is a portion of the property from Rezoning 
Case No. Z-48-07.  She noted that there were no specific plans in 2007 and a 
stipulation was included requiring conceptual site plans and elevations to be reviewed 
and approved through the Planning Hearing Officer (PHO) process. She stated that the 
proposed development is a 306-unit, multifamily residential community that is bisected 
by Arroyo Norte Drive.  She added that the north side of the development will have 7 
buildings and the south side will have 8 buildings.  She added that the elevations depict 
buildings with a contemporary farmhouse style and palette complementary to the desert 
environment.  She stated that in addition to submitting plans for review and approval, 
there is a request of technical corrections for Stipulations 2, 3, and 7. 
 
Nick Wood, representative with Snell & Wilmer LLP, provided information regarding the 
location of the site and existing zoning.  He reviewed the conceptual site plan, noting 
that the site is separated by Arroyo Norte Drive, there are 7 buildings on the north side 
of the site, and 8 buildings on the south side of the site.  He stated that the site will be 
directly adjacent to the Arise Arroyo Norte multifamily residential development and 
Great Hearts Preparatory Academy.  He reviewed the elevations for the residential 
buildings and clubhouse, conceptual wall details, and color palette. 
 
Attachment B

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE: 
Committee member Scott Lawrence asked for clarification regarding the Arise Arroyo 
Norte development.  Committee member Massimo Sommacampagna stated that 
there was a PHO case for the development prior to Committee member Scott 
Lawrence joining the Committee.  He added that the development will be a multifamily 
rental community with single-story, bungalow-style homes. 
 
Committee member Jeff Riederer asked about the site wall between the property and 
the school.  Nick Wood stated that there would be partial view fencing between the 
development and the school.  Committee member Jeff Riederer asked if he 
anticipated any concerns with partial view fencing in that area.  Nick Wood stated that 
there were no concerns 
 
PUBLIC COMMENTS: 
Harmony Brown, a member of the public, stated that the developer should review the 
impact of traffic after Great Hearts Preparatory Academy and Arise Arroyo Norte 
developments are built.  She added that traffic is already a concern in the area and the 
development will only exacerbate those issues.  She also expressed concerns with the 
proposed density. 
 
Karen Allen, a member of the public, expressed concerns regarding the shared 
clubhouse on the south side of the site.  She asked how residents living on the north 
side of the site will safely cross Arroyo Norte Drive to use the clubhouse.  She stated 
that a single-family development is being built at the east end of Arroyo Norte Drive, 
which will also add traffic.  She expressed concerns regarding additional traffic from the 
proposed multifamily development. 
 
APPLICANT RESPONSE: 
Nick Wood stated that the density is permitted by right in the existing zoning district and 
the PHO case is at the VPC for discussion regarding the requested modifications, not 
the zoning district.  He added that two thirds of the development’s units will have one 
bedroom, hopefully reducing negative traffic impacts.  He added that direct access to 
the I-17 frontage road is unsafe, which is why both sides of the development will have 
ingress and egress onto Arroyo Norte Drive.  He added that the developer is working 
with the Street Transportation Department for appropriate pedestrian crossing across 
Arroyo Norte Drive. 
 
COMMITTEE MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE: 
Committee member Ozzie Virgil expressed concerns regarding density and traffic.  He 
stated that the development will create additional traffic problems.  He added that 
developers should listen to the community about what types of development they desire 
in the area. 
 
Committee member Massimo Sommacampagna stated that there have been 
numerous sites that have come to the committee to comply with a stipulation regarding 
review of conceptual site plan and elevations.  He stated that he did like the farmhouse 
style elevations and desert color palette. 
 
Committee member Jeff Riederer stated he understands resident concerns, but the 
PHO is limited to review of site plan and elevations.  He added that he appreciated the

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
designs, but would like developers to perform more due diligence with adjacent 
residents and their concerns. 
 
MOTION: 
Committee member Massimo Sommacampagna made a motion to approve PHO-2-
22—Z-48-07-1.  The motion was seconded by Committee member Scott Lawrence. 
 
VOTE: 
3-1 with Committee members Lawrence, Riederer, and Sommacampagna in favor and 
Committee member Virgil in opposition. 
 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS: 
None.