Attachment D - PHO Application - PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2022-05-25)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 130868 characters
PLEASE RESPOND ELECTRONICALLY TO BRAD WYLAM 2ND FLOOR, 602-256-3322 
To: 
Departments Concerned 
Date: March 18, 2022 
From: 
Alan Stephenson 
Planning & Development Department Director 
Subject:   P.H.O. APPLICATION NO. PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7 – Notice of Pending Actions  
 by the Planning Hearing Officer 
1.
Your attention is called to the fact that the Planning Hearing Officer will
consider the following case at a public hearing on April 20, 2022.
2.
Information about this case is available for review at the Zoning Counter in
the Planning and Development Department on the 2nd Floor of Phoenix City
Hall, telephone 602-262-7131, Option 6.
3.
Staff, please indicate your comments and respond electronically to
pdd.pho@phoenix.gov or you may provide hard copies at the Zoning Counter
in the Planning and Development Department on the second floor of Phoenix
City Hall by March 25, 2022.
DISTRIBUTION
Mayor’s Office (Lisa Fernandez), 11th Floor 
City Council (Sina Matthes, Tony Motola ), 11th Floor 
Aviation (Sheldon Daisley)
CED (Michelle Pierson), 20th Floor 
Fire Prevention (Aaron Conway), 2nd Floor
Light Rail (Joel Carrasco/Special TOD Only)   
Neighborhood Services (Gregory Gonzales, Lisa Huggins), 4th Floor 
Parks & Recreation (Natasha Hughes), 16th Floor 
Public Transit (Michael Pierce)
Public Works (Ray Dovalina, Kristina Jensen, Elise Moore, Rudy Rangel), 5th Floor 
Street Transportation Department (Maja Brkovic, Alan Hilty, Chris Kowalsky), 5th Floor 
Street Transportation - Ped. Safety Coordinator (Mailen Pankiewicz), 5th Floor 
Water Services (Don Reynolds, Victor Romo), 8th Floor
Planning and Development (Alan Stephenson, Joshua Bednarek), 3rd Floor 
Planning and Development/Information Services (Ben Ernyei, Andrew Wickhorst), 4th 
Floor
Planning and Development/Historic Preservation Office (Kevin Weight), 3rd Floor 
Planning Hearing Officer (Tricia Gomes, Adam Stranieri, Brad Wylam), 2nd Floor 
Village Planner (Julianna Pierre, Laveen Village) 
Village Planning Committee Chair (Tonya Glass, Laveen Village)
Attachment D

200 W Washington Street, 2nd Floor * Phoenix, Arizona 85003 * Tel: (602) 262-7131 * Fax: (602) 495-3793
APPLICATION FOR PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION
APPLICATION NO: PHO-1-22--Z-51-08
Council District: 7   
   
Request For: 
Stipulation Modification
    Reason for Request:   Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance with the residential elevations date stamped
May 20, 2008 and the site plan date stamped August 11, 2008.   Deletion of Stipulation 1.a regarding the maximum size of the
commercial building to the north.   Deletion of Stipulation 1.b regarding the maximum size of the commercial building to the south.
  Deletion of Stipulation 2 regarding Planning Hearing Officer approval of elevations for the commercial pads.   Modification of
Stipulation 3 regarding general conformance with the conceptual landscaping plan date stamped July 25, 2008.   Modification of
Stipulation 4 regarding perimeter wall material and textural differences.   Modification of Stipulation 5 regarding shading and
connectivity of pedestrian walkways.   Modification of Stipulation 12 regarding a maximum number of 276 residential units. 
Deletion of Stipulation 13 regarding fencing, landscaping, and parking standards for the western property area.   Deletion of
Stipulation 15 regarding a minimum 15-foot landscape setback along the southern perimeter of the property.   Modification of
Stipulation 16 regarding Laveen Village Planning Committee review and comment on final landscape plans, lighting plans, and
sign packages.   Deletion of Stipulation 17 regarding parking lot screen and landscape along 35th Avenue.   Deletion of
Stipulation 19 regarding commercial monument signs.   Technical corrections to stipulations 8, 9, 10, and 14.  
   
Owner
Applicant
Representative
Laveen 12 LLC
Laveen 12 LLC
Benjamin Graff, Quarles & Brady LLP
8901 E. Raintree Dr., Suite 140
8901 E. Raintree Dr., Suite 140
2 N Central Ave, Suite 600
Scottsdale AZ 85260
Scottsdale AZ 85260
Phoenix AZ 85004
(602) 229-5683
(602) 229-5683
P: (602) 229-5683  F: 
egrant4@simaz.com                       
egrant4@simaz.com                       
benjamin.graff@quarles.com              
     Property Location: Approximately 1,500 feet south of the southwest corner of 35th Avenue and Southern Avenue
                                                                                                                                             
  
Zoning Map: D-6
Quarter Section: 2-20
APN: 105-89-003N
Acreage: 14.38
  
Village: Laveen  
Last Hearing: CC HEARING
Previous Opposition: No
Date of Original City Council Action: 09/03/2008 
Previous PHO Actions: 
Zoning Vested: R-4, C-1            
Supplemental Map No.: 
Planning Staff: 075891    
      An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized
substantive policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicable
review time frames, please call 602-262-7131 (option 6), email zoning.mailbox@phoenix.gov or visit our website at
http://phoenix.gov/pdd/licensetimes.html.
   A Filing Fee had been paid to the City Treasurer to cover the cost of processing this application. The fee will be retained to cover
the cost whether or not the request is granted
   
Fee 
Fee Waived
Fee Date
Receipt
Purpose
$1,725.00
$0.00
03/04/2022
21-0021167
Original Filing Fee
   
Signature of Applicant: _____________________________________________________         DATE: ___________________
   
Hearing Results

200 W Washington Street, 2nd Floor * Phoenix, Arizona 85003 * Tel: (602) 262-7131 * Fax: (602) 495-3793
   
Planning Hearing Officer
Planning Commission
City Council
Date: 04/20/2022 1000 AM
Date:
Date:
Appealed?:
Appealed?:
Action:
Action:
Action:

Benjamin W. Graff 
Direct Dial: (602) 229-5683 
E-Mail: Benjamin.Graff@Quarles.com  
 
Renaissance One 
Two North Central Avenue 
Phoenix, Arizona  85004-2391 
602.229.5200 
Fax 602.229.5690 
www.quarles.com 
Attorneys at Law in 
Chicago 
Indianapolis 
Madison 
Milwaukee 
Naples 
Phoenix 
Scottsdale 
Tampa 
Tucson 
Washington, D.C. 
March 23, 2022 
City of Phoenix Planning Hearing Officer: Legacy at Laveen Village 
 
 
I. 
Introduction and Property Information: 
 
Our firm represents Laveen 12 LLC c/o Scottsdale Investment Management, LLC 
("Laveen 12") in regard to the roughly 14.74-acre site located approximately 1,320 feet south of 
the Southwest corner of 35th Avenue and Southern Avenue (Parcel Nos. 105-89-003N and 105-
89-003Q) (the "Property").  See Aerial Maps attached at Tab A.  The Property is currently vacant 
with a single-family residence located at the Southeast corner of the Property. Laveen 12 intends 
to construct a 173-unit one and two story, single-family rental community. The development will 
consist of one-bedroom to three-bedroom units sitting at a density of 12.26 dwelling units per acre. 
The Property will feature ample open space and amenities including a pool area and leasing office. 
Specifically, the proposed development will feature 62 one-bedroom units, 93 two-bedroom units 
and 18 three-bedroom units and provide 84 garage parking spaces, 156 covered surface parking 
spaces and 110 uncovered surface parking spaces for a total of 318 parking spaces on the site. See 
Proposed Site Plan attached at Tab B, Proposed Elevations and Color Schemes attached at Tab C 
and Proposed Landscape Plan attached at Tab D.   
 
Scottsdale Investment Management, LLC (https://simaz.com/) is a real estate investment 
company with long-held ties to the Phoenix business community. They are a dynamic, fully 
integrated real estate group focused on acquiring, developing, and managing investment and real 
estate projects. 
 
 
II. 
Existing Zoning and General Plan: 
 
The Property is currently zoned R-4 (Multifamily Residence) on a majority of the Property 
and C-1 (Neighborhood Retail) on the portion of the Property fronting 35th Avenue. The Property 
has a General Plan designation of Commercial along a portion fronting 35th Avenue and 
Residential, 15+ Dwelling Units Per Acre on the remainder of the Property. The proposed single-
family rental community is in compliance with the General Plan. See Zoning and General Plan 
Maps attached at Tab A.

City of Phoenix Planning Hearing Officer Project Narrative 
Legacy at Laveen Village 
Page 2 
 
 
The current C-1 and R-4 zoning districts were approved under Rezoning Case No. Z-51-
08-7, per Ordinance No. G-5246, which is subject to several stipulations. A copy of Ordinance 
No. G-5246 is attached at Tab E and stipulated plans attached at Tab F. The previously approved 
development was comprised of both residential and commercial uses and was comprised of one-
bedroom to three-bedroom units sitting at a density of 25.34 dwelling units per acre, and at a height 
of three stories and 40 feet. The prior multi-family development consisted of 137 one-bedroom 
units, 127 two-bedroom units and 12 three-bedroom units with a total of 420 parking spaces and a 
total of 144 guest parking spaces.  The previously approved commercial development consisted of 
two buildings at a height of one story and 30 feet with a total of 148 parking spaces. The newly 
proposed development, with a reduction in height from 40 feet to 30 feet and a reduction in density 
from 25.34 du/acre to 12.26 du/acre, will be a significant reduction in intensity and should be 
welcomed and supported by the local community.  Our team will continue to reach out to the 
community and provide additional details regarding the proposed development. 
 
 
III. 
Stipulations:  
 
Below are the stipulations that we kindly request for deletion or modification with rationale 
stated below each stipulation. 
 
1. That the development shall be in general conformance with the residential elevations date 
stamped May 20, 2008 MARCH 4, 2022 and the site plan date stamped August 11, 2008 
MARCH 4, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations and approved by the 
PLANNING AND Development Services Department. with specific regard to the 
following: 
 
Rationale: Laveen 12 is proposing a new site plan and elevations for the proposed development. 
The development will no longer include the commercial portion previously proposed on the 
Property and will instead consist of a new site layout and configuration of a 173-unit single-family 
rental community. The elevations have been updated to reflect the new proposed development and 
consists of four-color schemes. 
 
a. That the commercial building to the north be a maximum of 5300 square feet. 
 
Rationale: The new single-family rental development will not include commercial uses on the 
Property. Therefore, we request the deletion of this stipulation.  
 
b. That the commercial building to the south be a maximum of 6700 square feet. 
 
Rationale: The new single-family rental development will not include commercial uses on the 
Property. Therefore, we request the deletion of this stipulation.

City of Phoenix Planning Hearing Officer Project Narrative 
Legacy at Laveen Village 
Page 3 
 
2. That the elevations for the commercial pads shall be approved by the Planning 
Hearing Officer through the public hearing process prior to Development Services 
Department preliminary site plan approval. This review is for conceptual purposes 
only. Specific development standards and requirements will be determined by the 
Development Services Department. 
 
Rationale: Due to no longer incorporating and developing the commercial pads previously 
approved on the Property, this stipulation will no longer be necessary. The requested modification 
to Stipulation 1 obtains the necessary review process and ability for public input on the newly 
requested elevations for the development.  
 
3. That landscaping shall be in general conformance with the conceptual landscaping plan 
date stamped July 25, 2008 MARCH 4, 2022, with the addition of landscape diamonds 
provided approximately every 6 stalls in the commercial and guest residential 
parking areas, THE UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS WITH MORE THAN 6 
STALLS WILL INCLUDE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS as approved or modified by the 
PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
 
Rationale: Laveen 12 proposes a newly updated landscape plan that reflects the updated proposed 
development and we request to update the stipulated landscape plan to the one submitted. We also 
request to delete the reference to the commercial parking area, as the new proposed development 
no longer proposes developing the commercial pads. Additionally, in place of the requirement for 
landscape diamonds to be provided every 6 stalls we request that the addition of landscape islands 
be provided in the uncovered parking areas with more than 6 stalls. The proposed development 
seeks to break up the parking area and intends to group small numbers of parking spaces together.  
Therefore, the requirement for landscape diamonds is no longer needed. We are offering additional 
landscape islands to ensure the parking areas have landscape to promote a comfortable 
environment for residents.  
 
4. That the EAST AND WEST perimeter wallS shall include material and textural 
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such as tile, 
glass insets, or stamped designs, as approved by the PLANNING AND Development 
Services Department. 
 
Rationale: We are requesting a modification to apply this stipulation, regarding enhanced wall 
materials and textural differenced, to only the east and west perimeter walls. The east and west 
perimeter walls are adjacent to public rights-of-way while the north and south perimeter walls are 
adjacent to private properties. Currently, the north property line has an existing wall between the 
Property and the Walmart Shopping Center to the north. The south perimeter of the property is 
adjacent to vacant undeveloped land. Due to the current conditions of the surrounding 
neighborhood, providing the additional material and textural differences requested is adequate on 
the east and west perimeter walls.

City of Phoenix Planning Hearing Officer Project Narrative 
Legacy at Laveen Village 
Page 4 
 
5. That all pedestrian walkways shall be shaded USING TREES AND OTHER SITE 
FEATURES TO THE EXTENT PRACTIABLE and connect all residential buildings to 
project amenities, commercial pads to the east and the commercial site to the north, as 
approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
 
Rationale: We request this modification to remove the reference to the previously approved 
commercial pads in order to bring the stipulation into alignment with the new proposed 
development. 
 
6. That the developer shall conduct archaeological monitoring and/or testing by a 
qualified archaeologist within all areas of the development prior to clearing and 
grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading, as approved or modified by the City 
Archaeologist. Further data recovery may be necessary based on results of the testing. 
 
Rationale: No change to stipulation. 
 
7. That the property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and operational 
characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to future owners or tenants of 
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the templates 
and instructions provided, which have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. 
 
Rationale: No change to stipulation. 
 
8. That right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the west half of 35th Avenue, as 
approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
 
Rationale: Technical correction to the department name. 
 
9. That right-of-way totaling 25 feet shall be dedicated for the east half of 37th Avenue, as 
approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
 
Rationale: Technical correction to the department name. 
 
10. That the developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with 
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and 
other incidentals as per plans approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services 
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards. 
 
Rationale: Technical correction to the department name.

City of Phoenix Planning Hearing Officer Project Narrative 
Legacy at Laveen Village 
Page 5 
 
11. That the applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project Information Form for 
the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to the Street Transportation Department. 
This form is a requirement of the EPA to meet clean air quality requirements. 
 
Rationale: No change to stipulation. 
 
12. That the maximum number of residential units shall not  exceed 276 173. 
 
Rationale: We request this stipulation to be modified to bring the number of residential units 
in compliance with the new proposed site plan and development. 
 
13. That the western property area shall be designed in the following manner as approved 
or modified by the Development Services Department: 
 
Rationale: We request that this stipulation be deleted in whole due to the redesign of the western 
property area. See additional rationale below.  
 
a. That owner shall file for and pursue a variance to allow for a maximum 8-foot 
ornamental iron view fence on the western property line; 
 
Rationale: Laveen 12 proposes to locate two-story units along the western property and will place 
parking area internal to the Property (as opposed to the prior development which placed significant 
parking adjacent to the western property line). The two-story single-family units proposed along 
the western portion of the site is consistent with the character of the detached single-family 
subdivision to the west. The residential properties to the west and adjacent to the Property are a 
mixture of one- and two-story homes. There is a significant buffer of the public right-of-way 
consisting of South 37th Avenue, which provides adequate setback between the existing homes 
and the new development. Additionally, the originally approved plans called for an apartment 
complex at 3 stories (40 feet). The new development's two-story product sits at a height of 30 feet. 
This is a large step down in intensity.  Due to this we are requesting to delete the requirement to 
go through the Zoning Adjustment Hearing process to secure a variance for an over height fence, 
as this is no longer necessary given the responsible design of the single-family rental community. 
We will conform to the Fencing Requirements for Multifamily Developments outlined in the 
Zoning Ordinance.  
 
 
b. Minimum 8-foot wide landscape setback between the block wall/view fence 
and the proposed parking structures along the western perimeter (additional 
landscaping shall occur outside the perimeter fence); 
 
Rationale: Due to reorientating the parking area and structures internal to the Property and away 
from the western property line, this stipulation is no longer necessary. We request that this 
stipulation be deleted to reflect the updated design of the site. We will conform to the Landscaping

City of Phoenix Planning Hearing Officer Project Narrative 
Legacy at Laveen Village 
Page 6 
 
Requirements for Multifamily Developments outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. Additionally, the 
outdoor private open space and patio area for individual units will be oriented toward the western 
property line further creating the buffer between the single-family residence to the west and the 
new proposed development. 
 
c. Covered parking spaces adjacent to required view fencing, located on the west 
end of the property shall be screened from the residential properties to the 
west of the site. The screening method shall consist of either landscaping or a 
wall attached to the parking canopy; 
 
Rationale: The parking spaces have been reoriented to the internal of the Property and are no 
longer situated along the western property line. Due to this improvement to the site design, we 
request the deletion of this stipulation, as the distance between parking areas and the existing 
single-family homes to the west has been greatly increased in the new design.  
 
d. A mixture of 75% 4 to 6-inch caliper trees within the landscaped setback shall 
be planted to act as a visual buffer between the western most apartment 
buildings and the residential properties to the west. 
 
Rationale: Laveen 12 has redesigned the western property area to create an appropriate transition 
from the existing single-family residences to the west and newly proposed single-family 
development. The new design provides a significant reduction in height and density that is more 
inline with the surrounding residential properties. Additionally, the new design no longer places 
parking areas directly adjacent to the existing homes. We request the deletion of this stipulation 
and will conform to the revised landscape plan and the Landscape requirements set forth in the 
Zoning Ordinance.  
 
14. That mature trees shall be salvaged and utilized within all the landscape setbacks with 
specific regard to placement of the larger specimens within the western landscape setback 
as approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
 
Rationale: Technical correction to the department name. 
 
15. That the applicant shall provide a minimum 15-foot landscape setback along the 
southern perimeter of the property. The setback shall be landscaped with a staggered 
double row of a 75% mixture of 3 to 6-inch caliper trees planted approximately 25-
feet on center as approved by the Development Services Department. 
 
Rationale: Due to the manner in which the revised plan now places homes along the southern 
property line, with backyards facing to the south, we request the deletion of this stipulation. The 
proposed development provides landscaping and open space that is carefully planned throughout 
the development. This includes the open space and amenity spaces that are centralized in the 
development and located at the northwest corner of the development.

City of Phoenix Planning Hearing Officer Project Narrative 
Legacy at Laveen Village 
Page 7 
 
16. That the final landscape plan, lighting plan, and sign package for the commercial and 
residential project shall be submitted to the Laveen Village Planning Committee for review 
and comment prior to preliminary site plan approval by the PLANNING AND 
Development Services Department. That all signs shall not exceed 6-feet in height as 
approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
 
Rationale: We request that the reference to the commercial project be deleted due to the new 
proposed development not incorporating the commercial pads. We have also included the 
landscape plan, lighting plan and sign package for review and comment by the Laveen Village 
Planning Committee.  This stipulation will be met prior to the Planning Hearing Officer hearing, 
as the Applicant intends to present this case to both the Laveen Village Planning Committee and 
the Laveen Citizens for Responsible Development in the coming months. 
 
17. That the parking lot screen wall and landscape pallet within the 35th Avenue 
landscaped setback shall compliment the adjacent existing development to the north 
and be compatible in color, texture, form and materials as approved by the 
Development Services Department. 
 
Rationale: Due to the proposed development no longer including the previously approved 
commercial pads, we request the deletion of this stipulation. The development is no longer 
proposing a commercial parking lot, and associated screen wall, on the east side of the Property.  
Therefore, there is no longer a need to match similar commercial development types and 
commercial landscape pallets. The newly proposed landscape pallet along 35th Avenue will match 
the landscape them proposed throughout the single-family rental community and will provide for 
an aesthetically pleasing perspective from 35th Avenue. The existing development to the north, 
the Walmart Shopping Center, has landscaping which is typical of a commercial development and 
with this proposed development strictly being a residential use, we believe the landscaping 
proposed in the Landscape Plan provides a better overall aesthetic to the Property.  
 
18. That the applicant shall notify the following individuals 15 days prior to any of the 
following events, Preliminary site plan review meeting, Zoning Adjustment hearing or 
Planning Hearing Officer hearing. 
a. Steven Klein - 6820 South 66th Avenue, Laveen, AZ 85339 
b. Phil Hertel - 2300 West Broadway Road, Phoenix, AZ 85041 
c. Jon Kimoto - 3216 West Ansell Road, Laveen, AZ 85339 
d. Mark Williams - 7150 East Camelback Road #285, Scottsdale, AZ 85251  
e. Randy Raskin - 5110 North 40th Street, Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ 85018 
 
Rationale: No change to stipulation.

City of Phoenix Planning Hearing Officer Project Narrative 
Legacy at Laveen Village 
Page 8 
 
19. That the two commercial monument signs on 35th Avenue, and the lighted signs on 
the commercial building shall be limited to a maximum of one user each, as approved 
by the Development Services Departments. 
 
Rationale: We request the deletion of the stipulation; the proposed development will not consist 
of the previously approved commercial pads and therefore no commercial monument signs are 
proposed.  
 
 
IV. 
Conclusion 
 
Laveen 12 LLC's goal is to develop the Property for a single-family rental community with 
173 units. We request modification and deletions of associated stipulations in order to bring the 
proposed development into conformance with the Zoning Case. We look forward to working with 
the City on the PHO application and hearing process. 
 
 
 
Very truly yours, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
QUARLES & BRADY LLP 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Benjamin W. Graff

TAB A

PARCEL NOS. 105-89-003N AND 105-89-003Q
SWC OF 35TH AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE, PHOENIX, AZ 85041
AERIAL MAP

PARCEL NOS. 105-89-003N AND 105-89-003Q
SWC OF 35TH AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE, PHOENIX, AZ 85041
AERIAL MAP

PARCEL NOS. 105-89-003N AND 105-89-003Q
SWC OF 35TH AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE, PHOENIX, AZ 85041
PARCEL MAP

PARCEL NOS. 105-89-003N AND 105-89-003Q
SWC OF 35TH AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE, PHOENIX, AZ 85041
ZONING MAP

PARCEL NOS. 105-89-003N AND 105-89-003Q
SWC OF 35TH AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE, PHOENIX, AZ 85041
GENERAL PLAN
Commercial/Residential 
(15+ du/acre)

PARCEL NOS. 105-89-003N AND 105-89-003Q
SWC OF 35TH AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE, PHOENIX, AZ 85041
PHOTOGRAPHIC ELEVATIONS

TAB B

II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
III
III
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
III
III
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
III
III
II
III
III
II
I
I
II
III
III
II
II
II
I
I
III
III
II
II
I
I
II
II
III
III
I
I
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
I
I
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
LO
BASELINE RD
43RD AVE
SITE
35TH AVE
SOUTHERN AVE
DEVELOPER / APPLICANT
SCOTTSDALE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
8901 E RAINTREE DRIVE, STE 140
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA
CONTACT:
TIM GRANT
PHONE:  480-860-2000
EMAIL:
TIMGRANT@SIMAZ.COM
CIVIL ENGINEER
TERRASCAPE CONSULTING, LLC
645 E. MISSOURI AVE. SUITE 160
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85012
CONTACT:
DAVID WEST
PHONE: (602) 753-5517
EMAIL: 
DWEST@TERRASCAPE.US
SCALE IN FEET
100
200
0
SCALE IN FEET
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR
LEGACY AT LAVEEN VILLAGE
35TH AVE AND SOUTHERN AVE
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH , RANGE 2 EAST, GILA
AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
Plotted: 03/04/22 - 11:52 AM, By: canderson
File: M:\1286_SIM_Laveen 12-SFR_Phoenix\DWG\Preliminary\1286_PRELIM SITE.dwg, ---> COVER
PROJECT No.
SHEET No.
TITLE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
of
2
PHO APPLICATION
03/04/2022
KIVA #: 20-3413
SDEV #: 2007873
PAPP #: 2210229
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
 
(
C
i
v
i
l
)
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
35584
DAVID M.
WEST
3/04/2022
COVER
CMA
DMW
1286
1
PRELIM SITE PLAN
LEGACY AT
LAVEEN VILLAGE
VICINITY MAP
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
 
(
C
i
v
i
l
)
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
35584
DAVID M.
WEST
FLOOD ZONE
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION "X" PER F.E.M.A.
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, MAP NUMBER
04013C2195L, PANEL 2195 OF 4425, DATED
OCTOBER 16, 2013.
ZONE "X" - AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOOD; AREAS OF 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD
WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT
OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1
SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY
LEVEES FROM 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD.
BENCHMARK
BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE AT THE
INTERSECTION OF 35TH AVENUE & SOUTHERN
AVENUE
ELEVATION = 1037.13 (NGVD 29 DATUM)
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
COLLECTIV LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
1426 NORTH 2ND STREET, STE 200
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004
CONTACT: RYAN WILT
PHONE: 
602-358-7711
EMAIL:
RYANW@COLLECTIVLA.COM
ARCHITECT
FELTEN GROUP
18325 N ALLIED WAY, STE 200
PHOENIX, AZ 85054
CONTACT: GERALD LAMB
PHONE: 
602-867-2500
EMAIL:
GERALD.LAMB@FELTENGROUP.COM
BASIS OF BEARING
NORTH 00°54'04" EAST - BEING THE EAST LINE
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, GILA AND
SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA. 
PER 
THE 
DEED 
OF 
RECORD,
RECORDED 
IN 
DOCUMENT 
NUMBER
2019-0335019, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS.
ZONING STIPULATIONS (ZONING CASE Z-51-08)
1.
THAT THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL
ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED  MAY 20, 2008 AND THE SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED AUGUST 11,
2008 AS MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT WITH SPECIFIC REGARD TO THE FOLLOWING
a)
THAT THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO THE NORTH BE A MAXIMUM OF 5300 SQUARE
FEET.
b)
THAT THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO THE SOUTH BE A MAXIMUM OF 6700 SQUARE
FEET.
2.
THAT THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL PADS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS PRIOR TO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THIS REVIEW
IS FOR CONCEPTUAL PURPOSES ONLY. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND
REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
3.
THAT LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPING PLAN DATE STAMPED JULY 25, 2008 WITH THE ADDITION OF LANDSCAPE
DIAMONDS PROVIDED APPROXIMATELY EVERY 6 STALLS IN THE COMMERCIAL AND GUEST
RESIDENTIAL PARKING AREAS AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
4.
THAT THE PERIMETER WALL SHALL INCLUDE MATERIAL AND TEXTURAL DIFFERENCES SUCH
AS STUCCO AND/OR SPLIT FACE BLOCK WITH A DECORATIVE ELEMENT SUCH AS TILE
GLASS INSETS OR STAMPED DESIGNS AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
5.
THAT ALL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS SHALL BE SHADED AND CONNECT ALL RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO PROJECT AMENITIES COMMERCIAL PADS TO THE EAST AND THE
COMMERCIAL SITE TO THE NORTH, AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
6.
THAT THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING AND/OR TESTING
BY A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST WITHIN ALL AREAS OF THE DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO
CLEARING AND GRUBBING LANDSCAPE SALVAGE AND/OR GRADING AS APPROVED  OR
MODIFIED BY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST FURTHER DATA RECOVERY MAY BE NECESSARY
BASED ON RESULTS OF THE TESTING.
7.
THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT DISCLOSE THE
EXISTENCE 
AND 
OPERATIONAL 
CHARACTERISTICS 
OF 
PHOENIX 
SKY 
HARBOR
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TO FUTURE OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THE PROPERTY. THE FORM
AND CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE TEMPLATES AND
INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WHICH HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY.
8.
THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY TOTALING 55 FEET SHALL BE DEDICATED FOR THE WEST HALF OF
35TH AVENUE AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
9.
THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY TOTALING 25 FEET SHALL BE DEDICATED FOR THE EAST HALF OF 37TH
AVENUE AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
10. THAT THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE
DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING, CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS,
MEDIAN ISLANDS, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER INCIDENTALS AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY
THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL, COMPLY WITH
ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.
11. THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THE DEVELOPER PROJECT
INFORMATION FORM FOR THE MAG TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TO THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. THIS FORM IS A REQUIREMENT OF THE EPA TO
MEET CLEAN AIR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS.
12. THAT THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL NOT EXCEED 276.
13. THAT THE WESTERN PROPERTY AREA SHALL BE DESIGNED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
a)
THAT THE OWNER SHALL FILE FOR AND PURSUE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A
MAXIMUM 8-FOOT ORNAMENTAL IRON VIEW FENCE ON THE WESTERN PROPERTY
LINE.
b)
MINIMUM 8-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK BETWEEN THE BLOCK WALL/VIEW
FENCE AND THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURES ALONG THE WESTERN
PERIMETER(ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING SHALL OCCUR OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER
FENCE).
c)
COVERED PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO REQUIRED VIEW FENCING LOCATED ON
THE WEST END OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE SCREENED FROM THE RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTIES TO THE WEST OF THE SITE. THE SCREENING METHOD SHALL CONSIST
OF EITHER LANDSCAPING OR A WALL ATTACHED TO THE PARKING CANOPY.
d)
A MIXTURE OF 75% 4-6" CALIPER TREES WITHIN THE LANDSCAPED SETBACK SHALL BE
PLANTED TO ACT AS A VISUAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE WESTERN MOST APARTMENT
BUILDINGS AND THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO THE WEST.
14. THAT MATURE TREES SHALL BE SALVAGED AND UTILIZED WITHIN ALL THE LANDSCAPE
SETBACKS WITH SPECIFIC REGARD TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE LARGER SPECIMENS
WITHIN THE WESTERN LANDSCAPE SETBACK AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
15. THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM 15-FOOT LANDSCAPE ALONG THE
SOUTHERN PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. THE SETBACK SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH A
STAGGERED DOUBLE ROW OF A 75% MIXTURE OF 3 TO 6 INCH CALIPER TREES PLANTED
APPROXIMATELY 25-FEET ON CENTER AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
16. THAT THE FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN, LIGHTING PLAN, AND SIGN PACKAGE FOR THE
COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PROJECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LAVEEN VILLAGE
PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
APPROVAL BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. THAT ALL SIGNS SHALL NOT
EXCEED 6 FEET IN HEIGHT AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
17. THAT THE PARKING LOT SCREEN WALL AND LANDSCAPE PALLET WITHIN THE 35TH AVENUE
LANDSCAPE SETBACK SHALL COMPLIMENT THE ADJACENT EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TO
THE NORTH AND BE COMPATIBLE IN COLOR TEXTURE FORM AND MATERIALS AS APPROVED
BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
18. THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY
OF THE FOLLOWING EVENTS: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN REVIEW MEETING, ZONING
ADJUSTMENT HEARING, OR PLANNING HEARING OFFICER HEARING.
a)
STEVEN KLEIN - 6820 SOUTH 66TH AVENUE, LAVEEN AZ 85339
b)
PHIL HERTEL - 2300 WEST BROADWAY ROAD, PHOENIX AZ, 85041
c)
JON KIMOTO - 3216 WEST ANSELL ROAD, LAVEEN AZ 85336
d)
MARK WILLIAMS - 7150 EAST CAMELBACK ROAD#285, SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
e)
RANDY RASKIN - 5110 NORTH 40TH STREET, SUITE 100 PHOENIX AZ 85018
19. THAT THE TWO COMMERCIAL MONUMENT SIGNS ON 35TH AVENUE AND THE LIGHTED SIGNS
ON THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE USER EACH AS
APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
PARCEL 1:
THE SOUTH 259 FEET OF THE NORTH 495 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND
SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO LAVEEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 59, A
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA RECORDED OCTOBER 01, 2002 AS
2002-1013178 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, FROM WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SECTION 34 BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
1314.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 236.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH
236.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 336.08 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE
OF 259.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 495.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 983.63 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 495.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE OF
1319.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND
FURTHER EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 02, 2011 AS 2011-0641509 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, OF THE
GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34, A MARICOPA COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE, FROM WHICH THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION, A MARICOPA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE, BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST (BASIS
OF BEARING), A DISTANCE OF 2628.07 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION, NORTH 00 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 03
SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 818.46 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 33.00 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2003-0834122, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS (M.C.R.) AND THE
WEST LINE OF THE EAST 33 FEET OF SAID SECTION AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID CERTAIN PARCEL,
SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 22.00 FEET, TO THE
WEST LINE OF THE EAST 55 FEET OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 00 DEGREES 47
MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 259.03 FEET, TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
CERTAIN PARCEL;
THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 53
MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 22.00 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID CERTAIN PARCEL;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID CERTAIN
PARCEL, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 259.03 FEET,
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2 (:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, FROM WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SECTION 34 BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
1314.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 236.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH
236.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 336.08 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE
OF 259.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 495.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 983.63 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 495.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE OF
1319.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN MAP OF DEDICATION FOR "37TH AVENUE AT AMBER
RIDGE HEIGHTS" RECORDED IN BOOK 823 OF MAPS, PAGE 16; AND
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX IN DEED RECORDED IN
2011-0319976 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (CONT.)
SHEET INDEX
SHEET NAME
SHEET NO.
COVER
1
SITE PLAN
2
35TH AVENUE
37TH AVENUE

S. 37TH AVE
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
III
III
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
III
III
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
III
III
II
III
III
II
I
I
II
III
III
II
II
II
I
I
III
III
II
II
I
I
II
II
III
III
I
I
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
I
I
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
35TH AVE
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
LO
26'
26'
26'
26'
26'
26'
26'
50'
26'
25' MIN
 BLDG SB
35TH AVE
13' MIN
 BLDG SB
10'
 BLDG SB
20' BLDG SB
20' BLDG SB
30'
13' MIN
 BLDG SB
15'
 BLDG SB
10'
 BLDG SB
13' MIN
 BLDG SB
W. LEODRA LN
W. LYDIA LN
R-4
C-2
RU-43
(COUNTY)
C-1
R-4
C-1
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
24
24
9
9
1
2
3
4
5
5
5
5
6
8
7
10
10
10
11
11
15
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
18
18
18
18
18
15
15
16
16
18
18
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
21
22
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
24
25









































































5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
4'
5'
5'
4'
4'
5'
4'
4'
4'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
4'
4'
4'
4'
11
25
25
EGRESS
ONLY
INGRESS/
EGRESS
I
I
II
II
III
III
II
1-BEDROOM
(DUPLEX)
2-BEDROOM
(SINGLE)
2-BEDROOM
(DUPLEX)
3-BEDROOM
(DUPLEX)
GARAGE




ADA ROUTE
PROPERTY LINE
UNDERGROUND
RETENTION
SCALE IN FEET
50
100
0
SCALE IN FEET
DATE
DESCRIPTION
Plotted: 03/04/22 - 11:53 AM, By: canderson
File: M:\1286_SIM_Laveen 12-SFR_Phoenix\DWG\Preliminary\1286_PRELIM SITE.dwg, ---> SITE PLAN
PROJECT No.
SHEET No.
TITLE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
of
2
PHO APPLICATION
03/04/2022
KIVA #: 20-3413
SDEV #: 2007873
PAPP #: 2210229
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
 
(
C
i
v
i
l
)
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
35584
DAVID M.
WEST
3/04/2022
SITE PLAN
CMA
DMW
1286
1
PRELIM SITE PLAN
LEGACY AT
LAVEEN VILLAGE
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
 
(
C
i
v
i
l
)
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
35584
DAVID M.
WEST
1.
ENTRY MONUMENT
2.
VISITOR CALL BOX
3.
LEASING OFFICE
4.
POOL
5.
TURF AREA
6.
DOG PARK
7.
DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF PHOENIX STD DTL P-1255-1
8.
DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF PHOENIX STD DTL P-1255-2
9.
TRAFFIC VISIBILITY (10' X 20')
10.
VEHICLE ACCESS GATE
11. PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE GATE
12.
SIDEWALK
13.
6" VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER
14. ROLL CURB
15.
6' HIGH THEME WALL
16.
6' HIGH BUILDER WALL
17.
6' HIGH FULL VIEW FENCE
18.
SOLID WASTE ACCESS & CONTAINMENT ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF PHOENIX 
STANDARDS. (8 CY DUMPSTERS)
19. PARKING STALL
20. ADA PARKING STALL (11' X 18')
21. COVERED PARKING STRUCTURE - 8'2" CLEAR WITH MINIMUM 1.5' OVERHANG)
22. PARKING GARAGE
23. FIRE HYDRANT
24. FIRE DEPT. TURNING RADII ( 55' OUTER RADII, 35' INNER RADII)
25. STRIPED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
KEY NOTES
#
AREA (GROSS)
± 10.52 AC (458,277 SF)
DENSITY (DU/ACRE)
MAX.
GROSS
30.45
12.83
LOT COVERAGE 
50%
± 33%
MIN BLDG SETBACKS 
 PROV.
WEST   (1-BED=15', 2-BED=13', 3-BED=25')
13' MIN
EAST
--
SOUTH (1-BED=15', 2-BED=13', 3-BED=25')
13' MIN
NORTH
10'
MIN LANDSCAPE SETBACKS (FT)
5'
ZONING STANDARDS R-4
BUILDING TYPE
NO. BLDG.
MAX HEIGHT (FT.) 
BLDG AREA (SF)
1-BED (37%)
32 (64 UNITS)
19.5'
1,468
2-BED  SINGLE(15%)
26
16.8'
1,033
2-BED DUPLEX(37)
32(64 UNITS)
16.8'
2,066
3-BED  (11%)
9(18 UNITS)
30.3'
1,482
TOTAL 
172 UNITS
                   
153,284 SF
GARAGE
12
15.8'
1,232 SF
LEASING OFFICE
1
25
1000 SF
TOTAL
 15,784 SF
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BUILDINGS)                                                        169,068 SF
BUILDING CALCULATIONS
AREA (GROSS)
± 4.48 AC (195,035 SF)
DENSITY (DU/ACRE)
MAX.
GROSS
15.23
8.26
LOT COVERAGE
45%
± 23%
MIN BLDG SETBACKS 
 PROV.
WEST   
--
EAST
20'
SOUTH (1-BED=15', 2-BED=13', 3-BED=25')
13' MIN
NORTH
15'
MIN LANDSCAPE SETBACKS (FT)
5'
ZONING STANDARDS C-1 (R-3 STANDARDS FOR MF)
PARKING CALCULATIONS
PARKING REQUIRED
BUILDING TYPE
REQ'D SPACES
1-BED
64 UNITS (x 1.5)
96
2-BED
90 UNITS (x 1.5)
135
3-BED
18 UNITS (x 2.0)
36
TOTAL
267
RESERVED
172
UNRESERVED 
95
NOTE: TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES INCLUDES 1 RESERVED SPACE PER UNIT
PLUS GUEST PARKING PER COOP ZONING ORDINANCE  SECTION 702.B.2
PARKING PROVIDED
GARAGE (1 ACCESSIBLE) 
48
OPEN PARKING (UNRESERVED)
136
COVERED PARKING (RESERVED)
121
OPEN ACCESSIBLE (UNRESERVED)
2
COVERED ACCESSIBLE (RESERVED)
3
         TOTAL
310
RESERVED
172
UNRESERVED
138
NOTES: GARAGE SPACES ARE COUNTED AS A PART OF TOTAL RESERVED
SPACE COUNT.  TOTAL ACCESSIBLE IS 2% OF TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING
STALLS PER COP ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 702.G.
DIMENSIONS:
PARKING STALL - 9' X 18'
ACCESSIBLE STALL - 11' X 18' (5' ACCESS AISLE)
SITE AREA (GROSS):
± 14.74 AC (642,074.4 SF)
SITE AREA (NET): 
± 14.11 AC (614,631.6 SF)
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (GROSS):
5% (± 30,731 SF)
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (GROSS):
5.1% (± 32,755 SF)
DENSITY (NET):
11.67 DU/AC
NO. OF UNITS:
172
APNS: 
105-89-003N, 105-89-003Q
EXISTING ZONING:               
R-4 (MULTIPLE FAMILY 
RESIDENCE
C-1(COMMERICAL- 
NEIGHBORHOOD
ZONING CASE:                  
Z-51-08
SITE ADDRESS:
35TH AVE AND SOUTHERN AVE
PHOENIX, AZ 85043
PROJECT  DATA
LEGEND

TAB C

COLOR SCHEME 1

COLOR SCHEME 3

COLOR SCHEME 2

COLOR SCHEME 4

COLOR SCHEME 3

COLOR SCHEME 1

COLOR SCHEME 2

COLOR SCHEME 4

COLOR SCHEME 1

11-16-2021
Legacy at Laveen Village
Masonry:
Urbana Smooth - Smoke
Mfg: Coronado Stone
Roof:
5503 Sierra Madre Ponderosa
Mfg: Eagle Roofing
Patio Trellis:
Spanish Brown
Mfg: Alumawood
Front Door/ Shutters:
Web Gray (SW 7075)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Fascia:
Black Magic (SW 6991)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Trim:
Colonnade Gray (SW 7641)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Accent Body 1:
Summit Gray (SW 7669)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Main Body:
High Reflective White
(SW 7757)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
COLOR SCHEME-1

11-16-2021
Legacy at Laveen Village
Masonry:
French Limestone - French White
Mfg: Coronado Stone
Roof:
5699 Charcoal Range Ponderosa
Mfg: Eagle Roofing
Patio Trellis:
Graphite
Mfg: Alumawood
Front Door/ Shutters:
Tricorn Black (SW 6258)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Fascia:
Pure White (SW 7005)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Trim:
Pure White (SW 7005)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Accent Body 1:
Wall Street (SW 7665)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Main Body:
Reflection (SW 7661)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
COLOR SCHEME-2

11-16-2021
Legacy at Laveen Village
Masonry:
Playa Vista Limestone - Cream
Mfg: Coronado Stone
Roof:
5511 Flintridge Gray
Mfg: Eagle Roofing
Patio Trellis:
Spanish Brown
Mfg: Alumawood
Front Door/ Shutters:
Smokey Topaz (SW 6117)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Fascia:
Westhighland White (SW 7566)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Trim:
Westhighland White (SW 7566)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Accent Body 1:
Dovetail (SW 7018)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Main Body:
Anew Gray (SW 7030)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
COLOR SCHEME-3

11-16-2021
Legacy at Laveen Village
Masonry:
Playa Vista Limestone - 
Black Forest
Mfg: Coronado Stone
Roof:
399 Charcoal Range Ponderosa
Mfg: Eagle Roofing
Patio Trellis:
Graphite
Mfg: Alumawood
Front Door/ Shutters:
Gibraltar (SW 6257)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Fascia:
Big Chill (SW 7648)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Trim:
Big Chill (SW 7648)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Accent Body 1:
Online (SW 7072)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
Main Body:
Site White (SW 7070)
Mfg: Sherwin Williams
COLOR SCHEME-4

TAB D

TAB E

TAB F

PRD
R1-6
C-2
S-1
R-2
R1-6
*
*
COUNTY
*
*
MARICOPA
*
ANX 236
Z-174-01
Z-108-04
ANX 384
Z-32-07
Z-138-05
ANX 345
Z-81-05
Z-7-03
Z-25-04
35TH AV
APP
S-1
Z-17-06
APP
S-1
Z-93-04
400
0
400
200
Feet
*   Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
APPLICANT'S NAME:
DATE:
REVISION DATES:
REQUESTED CHANGE:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
*   UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
FROM:
TO:
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT:
NORTH
75TH AVE
67TH AVE
59TH AVE
51ST AVE
43RD AVE
35TH AVE
27TH AVE
BROADWAY RD
BASELINE RD
SOUTHERN AVE
DOBBINS RD
ELLIOT RD
ESTRELLA DR
Z-51-08
APPLICATION NO.
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(N:\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\SuppMaps\2008\May\Z-51-08.mxd) 5/23/2008 
05-23-2008
LAVEEN VILLAGE
14.38 Acres
Z-51-08
 Q2-20
 D6
7 
C-1, (3.84 a.c.)
R1-8 PRD*
ANX 211
Z-56-01
R1-8 *
ANX 259
Z-170-01
Z-40-02
SUN WEST PROPERTIES - ROB LaGRONE
COUNTY RURAL-43, (Pending S-1,  14.38 a.c.)
C-1, R-4
55, 305
67, 367
R-4, (10.54 a.c.)
S-1 
14
14

S 34TH GLN
W LYDIA LN
S 37TH DR
W ST ANNE AVE
W BURGESS LN
S 37TH AVE
W LEODRA LN
PRIVATE RD
S 35TH AVE
PRIVATE
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
Planning & Development Department
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Property Location: Approximately 1,500 feet south of the southwest corner of 
35th Avenue and Southern Avenue
0
160
320
80
Feet ´

S 34TH GLN
W LYDIA LN
S 37TH DR
W ST ANNE AVE
W BURGESS LN
S 37TH AVE
W LEODRA LN
PRIVATE RD
S 35TH AVE
PRIVATE
R1-6*
R1-8*
R-4
S-1*
C-2*
C-1
S-1
R1-8
PRD*
R-2*
Planning & Development Department
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Property Location: Approximately 1,500 feet south of the southwest corner of 
35th Avenue and Southern Avenue
0
160
320
80
Feet ´

II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
III
III
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
III
III
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
III
III
II
III
III
II
I
I
II
III
III
II
II
II
I
I
III
III
II
II
I
I
II
II
III
III
I
I
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
I
I
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
LO
BASELINE RD
43RD AVE
SITE
35TH AVE
SOUTHERN AVE
DEVELOPER / APPLICANT
SCOTTSDALE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
8901 E RAINTREE DRIVE, STE 140
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA
CONTACT:
TIM GRANT
PHONE:  480-860-2000
EMAIL:
TIMGRANT@SIMAZ.COM
CIVIL ENGINEER
TERRASCAPE CONSULTING, LLC
645 E. MISSOURI AVE. SUITE 160
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85012
CONTACT:
DAVID WEST
PHONE: (602) 753-5517
EMAIL: 
DWEST@TERRASCAPE.US
SCALE IN FEET
100
200
0
SCALE IN FEET
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR
LEGACY AT LAVEEN VILLAGE
35TH AVE AND SOUTHERN AVE
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH , RANGE 2 EAST, GILA
AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
Plotted: 03/04/22 - 11:52 AM, By: canderson
File: M:\1286_SIM_Laveen 12-SFR_Phoenix\DWG\Preliminary\1286_PRELIM SITE.dwg, ---> COVER
PROJECT No.
SHEET No.
TITLE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
of
2
PHO APPLICATION
03/04/2022
KIVA #: 20-3413
SDEV #: 2007873
PAPP #: 2210229
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
(
C
i
v
i
l
)
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
N
O
.
D
a
t
e
S
i
g
n
e
d
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
35584
DAVID M.
WEST
3/04/2022
COVER
CMA
DMW
1286
1
PRELIM SITE PLAN
LEGACY AT
LAVEEN VILLAGE
VICINITY MAP
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
(
C
i
v
i
l
)
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
N
O
.
D
a
t
e
S
i
g
n
e
d
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
35584
DAVID M.
WEST
FLOOD ZONE
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION "X" PER F.E.M.A.
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, MAP NUMBER
04013C2195L, PANEL 2195 OF 4425, DATED
OCTOBER 16, 2013.
ZONE "X" - AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOOD; AREAS OF 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD
WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT
OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1
SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY
LEVEES FROM 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD.
BENCHMARK
BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE AT THE
INTERSECTION OF 35TH AVENUE & SOUTHERN
AVENUE
ELEVATION = 1037.13 (NGVD 29 DATUM)
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
COLLECTIV LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
1426 NORTH 2ND STREET, STE 200
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004
CONTACT: RYAN WILT
PHONE: 
602-358-7711
EMAIL:
RYANW@COLLECTIVLA.COM
ARCHITECT
FELTEN GROUP
18325 N ALLIED WAY, STE 200
PHOENIX, AZ 85054
CONTACT: GERALD LAMB
PHONE: 
602-867-2500
EMAIL:
GERALD.LAMB@FELTENGROUP.COM
BASIS OF BEARING
NORTH 00°54'04" EAST - BEING THE EAST LINE
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, GILA AND
SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA. 
PER 
THE 
DEED 
OF 
RECORD,
RECORDED 
IN 
DOCUMENT 
NUMBER
2019-0335019, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS.
ZONING STIPULATIONS (ZONING CASE Z-51-08)
1.
THAT THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL
ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED  MAY 20, 2008 AND THE SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED AUGUST 11,
2008 AS MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT WITH SPECIFIC REGARD TO THE FOLLOWING
a)
THAT THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO THE NORTH BE A MAXIMUM OF 5300 SQUARE
FEET.
b)
THAT THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO THE SOUTH BE A MAXIMUM OF 6700 SQUARE
FEET.
2.
THAT THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL PADS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS PRIOR TO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THIS REVIEW
IS FOR CONCEPTUAL PURPOSES ONLY. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND
REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
3.
THAT LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPING PLAN DATE STAMPED JULY 25, 2008 WITH THE ADDITION OF LANDSCAPE
DIAMONDS PROVIDED APPROXIMATELY EVERY 6 STALLS IN THE COMMERCIAL AND GUEST
RESIDENTIAL PARKING AREAS AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
4.
THAT THE PERIMETER WALL SHALL INCLUDE MATERIAL AND TEXTURAL DIFFERENCES SUCH
AS STUCCO AND/OR SPLIT FACE BLOCK WITH A DECORATIVE ELEMENT SUCH AS TILE
GLASS INSETS OR STAMPED DESIGNS AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
5.
THAT ALL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS SHALL BE SHADED AND CONNECT ALL RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO PROJECT AMENITIES COMMERCIAL PADS TO THE EAST AND THE
COMMERCIAL SITE TO THE NORTH, AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
6.
THAT THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING AND/OR TESTING
BY A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST WITHIN ALL AREAS OF THE DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO
CLEARING AND GRUBBING LANDSCAPE SALVAGE AND/OR GRADING AS APPROVED  OR
MODIFIED BY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST FURTHER DATA RECOVERY MAY BE NECESSARY
BASED ON RESULTS OF THE TESTING.
7.
THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT DISCLOSE THE
EXISTENCE 
AND 
OPERATIONAL 
CHARACTERISTICS 
OF 
PHOENIX 
SKY 
HARBOR
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TO FUTURE OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THE PROPERTY. THE FORM
AND CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE TEMPLATES AND
INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WHICH HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY.
8.
THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY TOTALING 55 FEET SHALL BE DEDICATED FOR THE WEST HALF OF
35TH AVENUE AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
9.
THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY TOTALING 25 FEET SHALL BE DEDICATED FOR THE EAST HALF OF 37TH
AVENUE AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
10. THAT THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE
DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING, CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS,
MEDIAN ISLANDS, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER INCIDENTALS AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY
THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL, COMPLY WITH
ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.
11. THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THE DEVELOPER PROJECT
INFORMATION FORM FOR THE MAG TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TO THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. THIS FORM IS A REQUIREMENT OF THE EPA TO
MEET CLEAN AIR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS.
12. THAT THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL NOT EXCEED 276.
13. THAT THE WESTERN PROPERTY AREA SHALL BE DESIGNED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
a)
THAT THE OWNER SHALL FILE FOR AND PURSUE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A
MAXIMUM 8-FOOT ORNAMENTAL IRON VIEW FENCE ON THE WESTERN PROPERTY
LINE.
b)
MINIMUM 8-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK BETWEEN THE BLOCK WALL/VIEW
FENCE AND THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURES ALONG THE WESTERN
PERIMETER(ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING SHALL OCCUR OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER
FENCE).
c)
COVERED PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO REQUIRED VIEW FENCING LOCATED ON
THE WEST END OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE SCREENED FROM THE RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTIES TO THE WEST OF THE SITE. THE SCREENING METHOD SHALL CONSIST
OF EITHER LANDSCAPING OR A WALL ATTACHED TO THE PARKING CANOPY.
d)
A MIXTURE OF 75% 4-6" CALIPER TREES WITHIN THE LANDSCAPED SETBACK SHALL BE
PLANTED TO ACT AS A VISUAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE WESTERN MOST APARTMENT
BUILDINGS AND THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO THE WEST.
14. THAT MATURE TREES SHALL BE SALVAGED AND UTILIZED WITHIN ALL THE LANDSCAPE
SETBACKS WITH SPECIFIC REGARD TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE LARGER SPECIMENS
WITHIN THE WESTERN LANDSCAPE SETBACK AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
15. THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM 15-FOOT LANDSCAPE ALONG THE
SOUTHERN PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. THE SETBACK SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH A
STAGGERED DOUBLE ROW OF A 75% MIXTURE OF 3 TO 6 INCH CALIPER TREES PLANTED
APPROXIMATELY 25-FEET ON CENTER AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
16. THAT THE FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN, LIGHTING PLAN, AND SIGN PACKAGE FOR THE
COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PROJECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LAVEEN VILLAGE
PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
APPROVAL BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. THAT ALL SIGNS SHALL NOT
EXCEED 6 FEET IN HEIGHT AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
17. THAT THE PARKING LOT SCREEN WALL AND LANDSCAPE PALLET WITHIN THE 35TH AVENUE
LANDSCAPE SETBACK SHALL COMPLIMENT THE ADJACENT EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TO
THE NORTH AND BE COMPATIBLE IN COLOR TEXTURE FORM AND MATERIALS AS APPROVED
BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
18. THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY
OF THE FOLLOWING EVENTS: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN REVIEW MEETING, ZONING
ADJUSTMENT HEARING, OR PLANNING HEARING OFFICER HEARING.
a)
STEVEN KLEIN - 6820 SOUTH 66TH AVENUE, LAVEEN AZ 85339
b)
PHIL HERTEL - 2300 WEST BROADWAY ROAD, PHOENIX AZ, 85041
c)
JON KIMOTO - 3216 WEST ANSELL ROAD, LAVEEN AZ 85336
d)
MARK WILLIAMS - 7150 EAST CAMELBACK ROAD#285, SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
e)
RANDY RASKIN - 5110 NORTH 40TH STREET, SUITE 100 PHOENIX AZ 85018
19. THAT THE TWO COMMERCIAL MONUMENT SIGNS ON 35TH AVENUE AND THE LIGHTED SIGNS
ON THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE USER EACH AS
APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
PARCEL 1:
THE SOUTH 259 FEET OF THE NORTH 495 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND
SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO LAVEEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 59, A
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA RECORDED OCTOBER 01, 2002 AS
2002-1013178 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, FROM WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SECTION 34 BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
1314.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 236.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH
236.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 336.08 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE
OF 259.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 495.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 983.63 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 495.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE OF
1319.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND
FURTHER EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 02, 2011 AS 2011-0641509 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, OF THE
GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34, A MARICOPA COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE, FROM WHICH THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION, A MARICOPA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE, BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST (BASIS
OF BEARING), A DISTANCE OF 2628.07 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION, NORTH 00 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 03
SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 818.46 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 33.00 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2003-0834122, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS (M.C.R.) AND THE
WEST LINE OF THE EAST 33 FEET OF SAID SECTION AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID CERTAIN PARCEL,
SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 22.00 FEET, TO THE
WEST LINE OF THE EAST 55 FEET OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 00 DEGREES 47
MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 259.03 FEET, TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
CERTAIN PARCEL;
THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 53
MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 22.00 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID CERTAIN PARCEL;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID CERTAIN
PARCEL, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 259.03 FEET,
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2 (:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, FROM WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SECTION 34 BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
1314.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 236.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH
236.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 336.08 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE
OF 259.03 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 495.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 983.63 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 495.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE OF
1319.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN MAP OF DEDICATION FOR "37TH AVENUE AT AMBER
RIDGE HEIGHTS" RECORDED IN BOOK 823 OF MAPS, PAGE 16; AND
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX IN DEED RECORDED IN
2011-0319976 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (CONT.)
SHEET INDEX
SHEET NAME
SHEET NO.
COVER
1
SITE PLAN
2
35TH AVENUE
37TH AVENUE
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022
Proposed Conceptual Site Plan

S. 37TH AVE
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
III
III
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
III
III
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
III
III
II
III
III
II
I
I
II
III
III
II
II
II
I
I
III
III
II
II
I
I
II
II
III
III
I
I
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
I
I
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
35TH AVE
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
LO
26'
26'
26'
26'
26'
26'
26'
50'
26'
25' MIN
 BLDG SB
35TH AVE
13' MIN
 BLDG SB
10'
 BLDG SB
20' BLDG SB
20' BLDG SB
30'
13' MIN
 BLDG SB
15'
 BLDG SB
10'
 BLDG SB
13' MIN
 BLDG SB
W. LEODRA LN
W. LYDIA LN
R-4
C-2
RU-43
(COUNTY)
C-1
R-4
C-1
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
24
24
9
9
1
2
3
4
5
5
5
5
6
8
7
10
10
10
11
11
15
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
18
18
18
18
18
15
15
16
16
18
18
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
21
22
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
24
25
l
l
l l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
4'
5'
5'
4'
4'
5'
4'
4'
4'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
4'
4'
4'
4'
11
25
25
EGRESS
ONLY
INGRESS/
EGRESS
I
I
II
II
III
III
II
1-BEDROOM
(DUPLEX)
2-BEDROOM
(SINGLE)
2-BEDROOM
(DUPLEX)
3-BEDROOM
(DUPLEX)
GARAGE
l
l
l
l
ADA ROUTE
PROPERTY LINE
UNDERGROUND
RETENTION
SCALE IN FEET
50
100
0
SCALE IN FEET
DATE
DESCRIPTION
Plotted: 03/04/22 - 11:53 AM, By: canderson
File: M:\1286_SIM_Laveen 12-SFR_Phoenix\DWG\Preliminary\1286_PRELIM SITE.dwg, ---> SITE PLAN
PROJECT No.
SHEET No.
TITLE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
of
2
PHO APPLICATION
03/04/2022
KIVA #: 20-3413
SDEV #: 2007873
PAPP #: 2210229
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
(
C
i
v
i
l
)
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
N
O
.
D
a
t
e
S
i
g
n
e
d
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
35584
DAVID M.
WEST
3/04/2022
SITE PLAN
CMA
DMW
1286
1
PRELIM SITE PLAN
LEGACY AT
LAVEEN VILLAGE
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
(
C
i
v
i
l
)
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
N
O
.
D
a
t
e
S
i
g
n
e
d
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
35584
DAVID M.
WEST
1.
ENTRY MONUMENT
2.
VISITOR CALL BOX
3.
LEASING OFFICE
4.
POOL
5.
TURF AREA
6.
DOG PARK
7.
DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF PHOENIX STD DTL P-1255-1
8.
DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF PHOENIX STD DTL P-1255-2
9.
TRAFFIC VISIBILITY (10' X 20')
10.
VEHICLE ACCESS GATE
11. PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE GATE
12.
SIDEWALK
13.
6" VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER
14. ROLL CURB
15.
6' HIGH THEME WALL
16.
6' HIGH BUILDER WALL
17.
6' HIGH FULL VIEW FENCE
18.
SOLID WASTE ACCESS & CONTAINMENT ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF PHOENIX
STANDARDS. (8 CY DUMPSTERS)
19. PARKING STALL
20. ADA PARKING STALL (11' X 18')
21. COVERED PARKING STRUCTURE - 8'2" CLEAR WITH MINIMUM 1.5' OVERHANG)
22. PARKING GARAGE
23. FIRE HYDRANT
24. FIRE DEPT. TURNING RADII ( 55' OUTER RADII, 35' INNER RADII)
25. STRIPED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
KEY NOTES
#
AREA (GROSS)
± 10.52 AC (458,277 SF)
DENSITY (DU/ACRE)
MAX.
GROSS
30.45
12.83
LOT COVERAGE 
50%
± 33%
MIN BLDG SETBACKS 
 PROV.
WEST   (1-BED=15', 2-BED=13', 3-BED=25')
13' MIN
EAST
--
SOUTH (1-BED=15', 2-BED=13', 3-BED=25')
13' MIN
NORTH
10'
MIN LANDSCAPE SETBACKS (FT)
5'
ZONING STANDARDS R-4
BUILDING TYPE
NO. BLDG.
MAX HEIGHT (FT.) 
BLDG AREA (SF)
1-BED (37%)
32 (64 UNITS)
19.5'
1,468
2-BED  SINGLE(15%)
26
16.8'
1,033
2-BED DUPLEX(37)
32(64 UNITS)
16.8'
2,066
3-BED  (11%)
9(18 UNITS)
30.3'
1,482
TOTAL 
172 UNITS
153,284 SF
GARAGE
12
15.8'
1,232 SF
LEASING OFFICE
1
25
1000 SF
TOTAL
 15,784 SF
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BUILDINGS)
169,068 SF
BUILDING CALCULATIONS
AREA (GROSS)
± 4.48 AC (195,035 SF)
DENSITY (DU/ACRE)
MAX.
GROSS
15.23
8.26
LOT COVERAGE
45%
± 23%
MIN BLDG SETBACKS 
 PROV.
WEST   
--
EAST
20'
SOUTH (1-BED=15', 2-BED=13', 3-BED=25')
13' MIN
NORTH
15'
MIN LANDSCAPE SETBACKS (FT)
5'
ZONING STANDARDS C-1 (R-3 STANDARDS FOR MF)
PARKING CALCULATIONS
PARKING REQUIRED
BUILDING TYPE
REQ'D SPACES
1-BED
64 UNITS (x 1.5)
96
2-BED
90 UNITS (x 1.5)
135
3-BED
18 UNITS (x 2.0)
36
TOTAL
267
RESERVED
172
UNRESERVED 
95
NOTE: TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES INCLUDES 1 RESERVED SPACE PER UNIT
PLUS GUEST PARKING PER COOP ZONING ORDINANCE  SECTION 702.B.2
PARKING PROVIDED
GARAGE (1 ACCESSIBLE) 
48
OPEN PARKING (UNRESERVED)
136
COVERED PARKING (RESERVED)
121
OPEN ACCESSIBLE (UNRESERVED)
2
COVERED ACCESSIBLE (RESERVED)
3
         TOTAL
310
RESERVED
172
UNRESERVED
138
NOTES: GARAGE SPACES ARE COUNTED AS A PART OF TOTAL RESERVED
SPACE COUNT.  TOTAL ACCESSIBLE IS 2% OF TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING
STALLS PER COP ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 702.G.
DIMENSIONS:
PARKING STALL - 9' X 18'
ACCESSIBLE STALL - 11' X 18' (5' ACCESS AISLE)
SITE AREA (GROSS):
± 14.74 AC (642,074.4 SF)
SITE AREA (NET): 
± 14.11 AC (614,631.6 SF)
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (GROSS):
5% (± 30,731 SF)
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (GROSS):
5.1% (± 32,755 SF)
DENSITY (NET):
11.67 DU/AC
NO. OF UNITS:
172
APNS: 
105-89-003N, 105-89-003Q
EXISTING ZONING:
R-4 (MULTIPLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
C-1(COMMERICAL- 
NEIGHBORHOOD
ZONING CASE:
Z-51-08
SITE ADDRESS:
35TH AVE AND SOUTHERN AVE
PHOENIX, AZ 85043
PROJECT  DATA
LEGEND
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Conceptual Site Plan
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

COLOR SCHEME 1 
LEFT ELEVATION 
ue\iATIONA 
..,..,._.. 
1 
REAR ELEVATION 
FRONT ELEVATION 
ELfYAflOHA 
tJ• •f.d-
Building 1 I Unit A - Unit A I Legacy at Laveen Village I Phoenix, Arizona 
SIM 
RIGHT ELEVATION 
fl.WAfi5iiiA 
1111•1'..q' 
FELTENGROUP 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

COLOR SCHEME 3 
LEFT ELEVATION 
lU:v ... iibNI 
iii .. \-.O' 
I 
REAR ELEVATION 
ffi'iJ.-.TIOf,li 
iir .. •:p 
FRONT ELEVATION 
tiivM&i I 
,,.. ... I.& 
Building 1 I Unit A - Unit A I Legacy at Laveen Village I Phoenix, Arizona 
SIM 
RIGHT ELEVATION 
iiJCIAldii 
1/i3.,,-i' 
3-3-2022 
FELTENGROUP 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

COLOR SCHEME 2 
LEFT ELEVATION 
ELEVAf!OflA 
tr•f"O' 
Building 21 Unit BI Legacy at Laveen Village I Phoenix, Arizona 
SIM 
-•-t--
-V• 
--
REAR ELEVATION 
l.LEVAfiDtU. 
W•Nr 
FRONT ELEVATION 
ELE'o'AflClf,I i, 
!M" • 1'-V 
RIGHT ELEVATION 
(LEVA,TIONA 
L.-•r.cr-
FELTEN GROUP 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

LEFT ElllEVATl:ON 
., 
COLOR SCHEME 4 
iBuildi;ng ,2 II Unit B I Legacy at Laveen Villag,e II Pho,enix, Ariz.ona
REAR EILEVATI0N 
FRONT ELEVATION 
EIJ!:li'ATION B 
OONCRETE l'IOCIF 1U: 
oo-.UOtff 
_, 
RIGHT !ELEVATION 
p 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

COLOR SCHEME 3 
LEFT ELEVATION 
fl,,(IJ.i.fioirA 
1,e"•141" 
,,o....,.1'11 
REAR ELEVATION 
9,.£V,.10HA 
FRONT ELEVATION 
IC(rJ,.+&... 
lf4, •1Jf 
Building 3 I Unit B - Unit B I Legacy at Laveen Village I Phoenix, Arizona 
SIM 
RIGHT ELEVATION 
EI.IVATIOHA 
1/l"'•t:.C-
3.J-2022 
FEL TENGROUP 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

LEFT ELEVATION 
fiiv,.f&i 
w-... ,·.6-
REAR ELEVATION 
fi[,....,TIQNi 
i,i-.,·,6-
FRONT ELEVATION 
!:iivAnoH B 
1,111· • t".0-
1' 
I 
',, 
1, 
COLOR SCHEME 1 
, ' 
I 
Building 3 I Unit B - Unit B I Legacy at Laveen Village I Phoenix, Arizona 
RIGHT ELEVATION 
tifvATiSiii 
,iru:0-
3.3.2022 
FELTEN GROUP 
_.......,._ 
	&lat 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

COLOR SCHEME 2 
LEFT ELEVATION 
li.tvATOI• 
W•fd 
,,a Ill.Art 
REAR ELEVATION 
EiEVdol()HA 
1,1:"•1.ff' 
FRONT ELEVATION 
i!i.JNA.TioN-l. 
•t. .. 1-0"' 
Building 4 I Unit C - Unit C I Legacy at Laveen Village I Phoenix, Arizona 
SIM 
..,,,_, __ ....,_/U ... 
--
RIGHT ELEVATION 
11.E..,•Tlo,u 
1ie-.. 1':e' 
3-3-2022 
FELTEN GROUP --
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

LEFT ELEVATION 
l;l.£VATIOH8 
COLOR SCHEME 4 
REAR ELEVATION 
lf.UVolilDill 
1,,..,.1,6-
Building 4 I Unit C - Unit C I Legacy at Laveen Village I Phoenix, Arizona 
SIM 
RIGHT ELEVATION 
fl.l;VAhOH9 
3-3-2022 
FELTENGROUP 
--
»n 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

COLOR SCHEME 1 
LEFT ELEVATION 
ELEVATION i 
L 
.... • 1·.V 
REAR ELEVATION 
aivA@hii 
tf• 1-6' 
FRONT ELEVATION 
fiNI'fl& B 
iM • ,Jr-
Garage I Storage Building I Legacy at Laveen Village I Phoenix, Arizona 
SIM 
-·-·"'"-i....._ .. 
RIGHT ELEVATION 
£LlvATIONB 
iir'•t-<r 
l-'3-2022 
FELTEN GROUP 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Elevations
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

3 
ACCESS 
\ ,," 
,._ 
" 
'
\ 
-,. 
PLAN KEY NOTES 
[!] 6' HIGH MASONRY THEMEWALL, SEE ELEVATION
II]
RECESSED TRASH ENCLOSURE (MASONRY) TYP.
[I) PRIVATE WALLED PATIO, TYP. 
[!) COVERED PARKING STRUCTURE, TYP. 
IT) 6' HIGH ROLLING VEHICULAR GATES 
II]
COMMUNITY POOL WITH SPA, SHADE RAMADA, BBQ GRILL, SEATING AND
ENHANCED VEGETATION. 
[I) COMMUNITY DOG PARK WITH ENCLOSURE, GATES AND SEATING. 
II]
TURF AREA OPENSPACE, TYP.
12)
RESIDENT FRONT COURTYARDS WITH INDIVIDUALIZED THEME SHRUBS AND
SHADE TREES
CITY OF PHOENIX NOTES: 
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5_ 
6. 
7. 
FINAL BUILDING PERMIT CANNOT BE OBTAINED UNTIL BONDING OR 
APPROVED ASSURANCES IS PROVIDED FOR THE LANDSCAPING 
WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 
NO PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS, TYPE, SIZE, OR QUANTITY DEVIATIONS 
FROM THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE OR IRRIGATION PLANS WITHOUT 
PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF PHOENIX LANDSCAPE SECTION 
AT (602) 262-7811. 
ALL PLANT MATERIAL AND SPECIFICATIONS TO CONFORM TO 
ARIZONA NURSERYMAN ASSOCIATION STANDARDS. 
ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY AND CITY REQUIRED (PERIMETER, RETENTION, 
AND PARKING) PLANT MATERIAL TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES LOW WATER USE PLANT LIST. 
ALL EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS IN THE RO_W_ OR WASHES AND 
DESIGNATED TO REMAIN THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED WILL 
BE REPLACED IN LIKE KIND AND SIZE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 
CONTACT THE PARKS, AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT (PRO) PRIOR 
TO ANY RO.W. PLANT RELOCATIONS AT (602) 495-5994. 
ALL ON-SITE SIDEWALKS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3'-0" WIDE AND 
HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1 :20 WITH THE MAX. CROSS SLOPE OF 
1 :50. ALL CURBS MUST PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE RAMPS PURSUANT TO 
THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT STDS. 
WALLS ARE NOT APPROVED AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN BUT 
ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. 
--
8 RETENTION 
::: ::::
--- - -
3 
-
r:c-n.-.- « 
1%----.,t_
,.·<".:rc=; !
'--"c-------'+--'-;;;;;.,o.;::¾;:t_i;::_ ----- - 
' ," 
" ' 
, '
, 
\ 
--
,::. --
-
-
-- ;;c 
. , ,. 
...... .,.,,,. 
.,. .... ......... 
-
-
- - - -
., .... ......
..... ... ... 
., .... ... 
...
::::. - - :::
,::. -- - - -- -
,. . 
' 
,-
-
\ 
' 
\ ," 
MASTER PLANT LEGEND 
NOff All TREES SHALL COMPLYWl lHHE LATEST AMENDED BJITION 
OF THE 'ANA- RKOMMENDBJ TREE SPKIFICATIONS'
11.£1 PUBLIC WALKWAYS WITH ENHANCED VEGETATION AND SHADE TREES 
122] TOT LOT WITH WOODCHIP PLAY MEDIA AND PLAY EQUIPMENT
@I COMMUNITY ENTRY SIGNAGE, SEE ELEVATION 
Common Name 
TREES 
THORNLESS MESQUITE 
Botanical Name 
PROSOPIS HYBRID 
@I EXISTING CMU PROPERTY WALL, TIED INTO NEW PROPOSED THEMEWALL 
Ğ UNDERGROUND RETENTION 
DESERT MUSEUM 
WILLOW ACACIA 
PARKINSON IA HYBRID 
ACACIA SALICINA 
8_ 
PLANT LIST IS PRELIMINARY AND IS SUBJECT TO 
CHANGE. FINAL LIST MAY INCLUDE OTHER SPECIES AS 
ALLOWED BY THE ADWR APPROVED PLANT LIST AND/OR 
THE SONORAN PRESERVE EDGE TREATMENT 
GUIDELINES (WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE). 
9.
DECOMPOSED GRANITE, 1/2" MINUS 2" DEPTH, IN ALL
LANDSCAPE AREAS.
10.
ALL SWALE CHANNELS ARE TO HAVE 1" - 3" COARSE
LANDSCAPE ROCK OR OTHER APPROVED STONE
MATERIAL INSTALLED TO PREVENT EROSION.
11.
ALL BERM CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 1'-0", SLOPES
NOT TO EXCEED 4:1. 
12.
ALL TURF IS TO BE 'MID-IRON' HYBRID SOD.
13.
ALL HEADERS TO BE COLORED CONCRETE OR
APPROVED EQUAL. 
14. NO LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS EXIST ON-SITE THAT
REQUIRE PROTECTION OR COORDINATION, EXCEPT FOR
THE NATURAL WASH CORRIDORS.
EVERGREEN ELM 
ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 
CHITALPA TREE 
CHITALPA TASHKENTENSIS 
LIVE OAK 
QUECUS VIRGINIANA 
CRAPE MYRTLE 
LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 
DATE PALM 
PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA 
NATIVE PLANT SURVEY 
A NATIVE PLANT SURVEY AND SALVAGE PROGRAM WILL BE 
DEVELOPED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL. 
WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF PHOENIX 
GUIDELINES. SALVAGE PLANTS INCLUDES NATIVE TREES, SAGUARO, 
OCOTILLO, AND SMALL CACTUS_ PLANTS WILL BE SALVAGED AND 
HELD WITHIN AN ON-SITE NURSERY AND REPLANTED WITH 
CORRESPONDING PHASES. 
IRRIGATION PLAN 
COMMON AREA LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE WATERED BY 
AN AUTOMATIC, UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR 
MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY. TREES AND SHRUB AREAS WILL HAVE 
INDEPENDENT VALVES WITH COMPATIBLE PLANT TYPES. THE COST 
OF WATER AND MAINTENANCE WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF 
PROPERTY OWNER. 
MAINTENANCE 
ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNER. 
LANDSCAPE QUANTITIES 
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 14.74 ac. 
TOTAL AREA OF TURF: 28,900 S.F 
TOTAL AREA OF D.G.: 75,800 S.F 
TOTAL AREA (LANDSCAPEABLE): 75,800 S.F. 
TOTAL# OF PALM TREES: 0 
TOTAL# PROPOSED TREES: 400 
1 PER 20 LIN.FT. (40% 2"C, 60% 1"C) 
TOTAL# PROPOSED SHRUBS: 2,000 
5 PER TREE (75% 5 GAL, 25% 1 GAL) 
Size 
Common Name 
Botanical Name 
SHRUBS 
1" CALIPER 
HEAVENLY CLOUD TEXAS SAGE 
LEUCOPHYLLUM SPECIES 
8'H4'W 
WINTER BLAZE 
EREMOPHILA GLABRA SSP. 
1" CALIPER 
YELLOW BELLS 
TECOMA STANS 
8'H4'W 
BLUE BELLS 
EREMOPHILA HYGROPHANA 
2" CALIPER 
GREEN HOPSEED BUSH 
DODONAEA VISCOSA 
8'H4'W 
BOUGAINVILLEA BUSH 
BOUGAINVILLEA 'TORCH GLOW' 
DWARF OLLIE 
OLEA EUROPAEA 
2" CALIPER 
8'H4'W 
BRITISH RUELLIA 
RUELLIA BRITTONIANA 
MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALM 
CHAMAEROPS HUMILIS 
2" CALIPER 
BOUGAINVILLEA VINE 
B. KARST BOUGAINVILLEA
8'H4'W 
ACCENTS 
1" CALIPER 
PINK PARADE 
HESPERALOE X 'PIN KPARADE' 
8'H4'W 
SOFT LEAF YUCCA 
YUCCA RECURVIFOLIA 
1" CALIPER 
RED BIRD OF PARADISE 
CAESALPINEA PULCHERRIMA 
8'H4'W 
RED HIBISCUS 
HIBISCUS ROSA-SINENSIS 
24' HT 
GROUNDCOVERS 
NEW GOLD LANTANA 
LANTANA SPECIES 
REGAL MIST DEER GRASS 
MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 
DEER GRASS 
MUHLENBERGIA RI GENS 
OUTBACK SUNRISE EMU 
EREMOPHILA GLABRA 
CONSENT FOR REPRODUCTION 
I CONSENT TO THE REPRODUCTION OF THIS MASTER PLAN FOR 
THE PURPOSE OF FUTURE AMENDMENTS PROVIDED THAT IF 
MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE THE ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS WHO 
MAKE SUCH CHANGES ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY 
FOR THE CHANGES MADE TO THE PLAN. 
RYAN WILT 
03.03.2022 
NAME [PRINTED) OF COPYRIGHT OWNER 
DATE 
03.03.2022 
SIGNATURE OF COPYRIGHT OWNER 
DATE 
j 
UJ > 
<( 
.c ..... 
LO 
CV) 
n 
Size 
5GAL. 
5GAL. 
5 GAL. 
5GAL. 
5 GAL. 
5GAL. 
5GAL. 
5GAL. 
15 GAL. 
5GAL. 
5GAL. 
5GAL. 
5GAL. 
5GAL. 
1 GAL. 
1 GAL. 
1 GAL. 
1 GAL. 
o 
50' 
100' 
N 0 R T H 
SCALE: 1 "=50'
L E G A C y 
AT LAVEEN VILLAGE 
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 
VICINITY MAP 
SOUTHERN AVE 
w 
<{ 
Cl 
a:::"" 
-st-
DEVELOPER/ APPLICANT 
SITE 
ğ 
BASELINE RD 
w 
	 
f--
N 
SCOTTSDALE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT 
8901 EAST RAINTREE DRIVE 
SUITE 140 
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85353 
PHONE: 480.860.2000 
CONTACT: TIM GRANT 
EMAIL: timgrant@simaz.com
CIVIL ENGINEER 
TERRASCAPE CONSULTING, LLC 
645 EAST MISSOURI AVE 
SUITE 160 
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85012 
PHONE: 602.753.5517 
CONTACT: DAVID WEST 
EMAIL: dwest@terrascape.us
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 
COLLECTIV LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 
1426 NORTH 2ND STREET 
SUITE 200 
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004 
PHONE: 602.358.7711 
CONTACT: RYAN WILT, R.L.A 
EMAIL: ryanw@collectivla.com
NUMBERS: 210-04-016 
ZONING: PUD (Z-3-15) 
KIVA: 15-3108 
SDEV: 1900727 
PAPP: 1909455 
QS: 48-22, 48-23 
LANDSCAPE PLAN 
MARCH 3, 2022 COLLECTIV JOB# 83.11 
collecti\1
PRELIMINARY 
NOT FOR 
CONSTRUCTION 
L A NDS C A P E A R CHI T E C T S
SHEET 
-
of 3 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Landscape Plan
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

a·-a· 
ALL METAL COMPONENTS 
POWOERCOATEO: 
SW6041 OTTER 
4" WIDE X 2" DEEP T.S. POST 
2" SQ, T.S. VERTICALS 
2"SO. T.S 
PICKETS 
PERFORATED METAL PANELS 
2" SQ_ T.S. 
HORIZONTAL RAILS 
FENCE, COLUMN, AND WALL ELEVATION 
GATE 
rbctr----t-i10PERATOR
• 
VEHICULAR GATE ELEVATION 
4'-1 O" 
FINISH GRADE/ LANDSCAPE AREA 
6'-0" 
MONUMENT SIGNAGE ELEVATION 
PERFORA TEO METAL PANELS 
3" 
22'-6" (FIELD VERIFY) 
METAL TOWER PLANTER POWDER COAT WEATHERED BROWN'. 
CONCRETE CORNICE TO MATCH ICI 370 WOODRUFF'. 
CONCRETE CORNICE TO MATCH ICI 370 WOODRUFF'. 
LEGACY 
at LAVEEN VILLAGE .· 
FINISH GRADE 
DECORATIVE STEEL WALL CAP 
6'-8" HIGH COLUMN 
ALL STEEL POWDERCOATEO: 
DARK BRONZE 
s· X s· X s· CMU SMOOTH FACE. 
PAINTED ON BOTH SIDES 
2" SQ. TS. HORIZ. & VERTICALS 
SOLID STEEL PANEL 
WELDED ONTO 2" SO. 
T.S FRAME
2" X 4" TS. HORIZ. 
11'-3" 
REVERSE PAN CHANNEL HALO ILLUMINATED LETTERS. 
POWDER COAT WEATHERED BROWN'. 
STUCCO ON CMU. PAINT TO MATCH THEMEWALL 
DECORATIVE STEEL WALL CAP 
GATE 
OPERATOR tt-t----t-i 
FINISH GRADE 
CONCRETE CORNICE TO MATCH ICI 370 WOODRUFF' 
STUCCO FINISH 
3 
<l 
BOARD FORM CONCRETE BASE WALL 
ELEVATION 
SCALE: 3/ 4"" 1 '-0" 
ENTRYTHEMEWALL 
SEE DETAIL B, L6 
8"x8"x8"CMU 
SMOOTH FACE· 
SUPERLITE 
"MADISON' 
GROUT TO MATCH 
2'-0" 
4" WIDE X 2" DEEP T.S. POST 
½" SOLID STEEL PANEL 
(CENTERED) 
2" SQ. T.S. 
1"SQ. TS. 
• I ' I 
, 
I 
I·•··, 
I 
I ,: 
, 
4'-0" 
,-•.•.: : ,•' 
	----------t-i,
' 
• 
I·• .
6'-0" 
' ' 
:.\_f/ 
' . ... 
DECORATIVE STEEL WALL CAP 
6'·8" HIGH COLUMN 
8"x8"x8"CMU 
SMOOTH FACE -
SUPERLITE 
'MADISON' 
GROUT TO MATCH 
PERFORATED METAL PANELS 
L E G A C y 
AT LAVEEN VILLAGE 
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 
NUMBERS: 210-04-016 
ZONING: PUD (Z-3-15) 
KIVA: 15-3108 
SDEV: 1900727 
PAPP: 1909455 
QS: 48-22, 48-23 
SITE DETAILS 
MARCH 3, 2022 COLLECTIV JOB# B3.11 
SHEET 
collecti\1
PRELIMINARY 
NOT FOR 
CONSTRUCTION 
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 
-
of 3 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Landscape Plan
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

• 
PLAYGROUND ENLARGEMENT 
POOL AMENITY ENLARGEMENT 
Q] 
POOL 
LEASING 
OFFICE 
I\ 
PLAYGROUND KEYNOTES 
IT] SHADE RAMADA WITH PICNIC TABLES AND TRASH RECEPTACLE
[I) PLAYGROUND STRUCTURE OVER WOOD CHIP PLAY MEDIA
12)
ENHANCED PLANTING AND SHADE TREES AROUND PLAY NODE
DOG PARK KEYNOTES 
IT] OPEN LAWN WITH CONCRETE HEADER BORDER 
UNDERGROUND RETENTION UNDER LAWN 
[I] OMEGA ENCLOSURE FENCE 
12)
DOUBLE GATE ENTRY ENCLOSURE
0 SHADE TREES 
I / 
I I
POOL KEYNOTES 
IT] POOL AND SPA BY OTHERS 
[I) SYNTHETIC LAWN SUN DECK 
12)
SHADE RAMADA WITH SEATING AND BBQ GRILL STRUCTURE
0 6' POOL FENCE 
Q] 
LAWN 
t 
DOG PARK ENLARGEMENT 
L E G A C y 
AT LAVEEN VILLAGE 
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 
NUMBERS: 210-04-016 
ZONING: PUD (Z-3-15) 
KIVA: 15-3108 
SDEV: 1900727 
PAPP: 1909455 
QS: 48-22, 48-23 
AMENITY ENLARGEMENTS 
MARCH 3, 2022 COLLECTIV JOB # 83.11 
collecti\1
PRELIMINARY 
NOT FOR 
CONSTRUCTION 
LANDSCAPE 
ARCH I TECTS 
SHEET 
-
of 3 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Proposed Landscape Plan
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

-- 6ff. BL,(JCK WALi, 
PfR ZONINa COt?f, 
D 
' 
33' 
- -. ·--.,. ,. --
---
j 
SUN WEST PROPERTIES 
3333 N. 44th St. 
Phoenix, AZ 85018 
KTGY NO. 2007089.3 
- --
Zoning Exisling, 
RU-4;3: (Countǿ) 
Zof1f!'1g Proposed, 
R-4 
Net Ar-sa, 
10.8'21 Acres.
Ciro55 Area, 
I0.8S Acres 
Total Unit: 
27h Unite. 
61;ildlng !-!eight Propo$ecJ 4 Allowed, 
40' maximum 
Stories, 
Ȁ-5torise 
· 
::::>5rk, ing Requ irsd, 
COVERED PARKING: 
I BDRM • 137 UNIT$ (1.5) • 205.5 SPACE& 
2 BDRM : 121 UNIT5 (I.:,)  ISO.:, 6PACE5 
;Lg QR.tL.2..Jl.:. UtllJ_:;z_ .GLQ_} __ .::,._l:'f.,O . oE6.J; $. 
TOT AL. REQUIRED 
420.0 5F'ACE5 
TOTAL PROPOSED 
cȁuE$T PARKING: 
. I BDRM • 137 UNITS <0.5). • ii,8,:::, 5FACE5 
2 BDRM • 127 UN1i'5 (O.S) • Ȃ3.5 SPACES 
3 BDRM_ .. • .. 12 _ UNJT6JLOJ ___ • ]?.O :&f?ACEȃ 
TOTAL REQUIRER 
144.0 $PACES 
TOT AL FR0°()SED 
2!?.34 DU/ Acre 
144 5PACE5 
LJ 
1-
l 
Commercial Pc,:>.iect Lr:iJ'armalion: 
Zcnir,g Exie,trng, 'ȄU-43 (C:oi..inly) . ·
Zoning Proposed,\; C-1 
Net Ared, 
3.22 Acree, .
Gross Area: 
3.8!::>/Acres 
Lot Coverage. Pr9posed,. 11,ȅ25 5.F. (0.21 Ac. ·· .1%) . 
Building µI.Slight. Pcoposed 4 Allowed, 
30' maxtmum 
Stories: 
I-Story .• : 
Parking F-:ec1u!red,{ 
6ANk 6UIL.DING: 
I SF ACE/30«:.,ji 5.F:. (525() e>.F:>
TO, AL. FROIP05ED 
NEW. RESTAl,,:ANT; 
l SPACE/!?O 5.F. (66"15 5.F.)
TOTAL PROP:pSEQ 
• 17.5 oF'ACE5
18 SFACES 
133.5 5PACE5 
134 SPACE&. 
. 
. 
· Q!:!bQ_al-.Sit_p_· l--: __ 
B_2
;,, 
l 
A 
Laveen 
-.Cotntnons 
. ' 
{;\ 
p h. c)e·••h f•
Ariz ona 
I 
I 
I 
I 
111 
.::J z 
111 > 
<[ 
·r
j-.. , 
1{)
0)
I 
I 
l I 
Rl-6 
CITY OF PHOENIX
AUG 1 1 2008 
Planning Department
--L·j
. , I 
Ii --
--, --
0 
40 
1!1111111111111 
'"'llllllllll!llllll!llffllll 
.. .... 
... 
20 
80 
KTGY GP'tOUP, INC,
AftCHJTE.CTURI!; 
PI.APUHNG 
r·.ya & a 
M 1 'r i:t"H 2 i.. L 
s ·,r . t
tTH 
l R V I N E.', 
<; A I. I P' 0 R N I A 
IQ. 1l't C 1 4
19.$0) $&1«21$$ 
FAX (041}} OIU !!11110 
0 1HG 
AU. RIGH1'S REM 
07-30-2008
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022
Stipulated Site Plan

,., .. ,, __ 
,,, ·, " -- •··:'
- . _.,
--·-· 
 ---- ... 
 ---'::-"ii,'-' 
' . 
.
.
. 
.
Typical FrontYB,.ear Elevation -A 
-½--,=--
I-
--- _.. -
• 
·- - __ 
,,,_ ........... ¤..,;..,., ... 
. Typical Front &l Rear Elevation -B 
SUN \VEST PROPERTIES 
3333 N. 44th St. 
Phoenix, AZ 85018 
KTGY NO. 20070893 
·-·------... Sx'f. l,.)btf-f f"'1(vf'.,e 
_.------- -e::;p, 1 MTteN ""?lr.:;,IN& 
"?TA	-btl-\b -
 NT  
M f', ""?I+/ f--) bl-El p.t:,c p__.-._
--TI vt:S- . wi. 1. fpS"f ar-o l'O. 
·· . .=SZ:-::-::c5· 
• _ ....  
. 
--t 
• ' 
," , 
_.,,,. .... --- 
-UY·( TlN <.?l?flWfOf<.
. - P-. -
š,. " ' 
_.,__ › '·œ (,. ... : 
• 
-
., ,,., 
8--
_ ... 
9"" "''•"""""''::·"'"'"~"••<• 
_,,' ...-y• '·-- ... 
--- , .. ••--· -""' ž .. -Z. - - --
-. .... 
,', 
..,..,..;.-, . 
--"' .. - . " 
---.....,. . Ÿ -- -
,,,,.-,.........,,,,___,....-«,.,,.,.,,,-,, --
""n 
s 
"• 
··-•-----.. 
 ¡ 
--·-
- .. . - ' - M' -- )!6 .. · ' .,.,. ..,,.,,_,,.. 
.... .. -::::.._.\" """ ::--:--· ·™ "" , . 
, "'"" . ·;::· -:-' 
U -
V-=----- -WX:.:-.-::;
:-·Y "➔Z
I+-----' 
Q-·-·· 
. --· .. ¢ -- . £
------
[------
---....--9 To 
trt7f'--4  , PRpc;l, . 
(L--1'.' 
_,., +l17f, it. LAP 
. . . 
$It?( Nb 
' 
-- \·---'---'
-
---------.c.-------- -] 1 ,T "'>I t>t 1'l b' -...
..--,, a;;# F S?)tr 10,b,U:;: f4'0F
-'--'--· 
____ ....;__ ___ /v'T - 
- - - ""' 
]^ ,"" _·7· .. -::::::-__ 
*,. 
¥ :=  _-:::;: ·_.::..__::::-: :..:1-:.-:.-,., -. -='""'."'. -:,-, =- -=:+-
'tit. 
,,_ .. -- ... `---
,._ a-- .. __ ..,,,;..;,__.., .• ---:-- ........ _ -
--
....,.. - b· .... ---., .. .. : 
......... 
.:.. - -- - .. _.....,_ ¦ -- - •" 
^-.. _-----`a- .- .. "'
...,, ...... - -·-
-:.;.... .. - ... -
§ . .,.;_ ---· - -· --
-----.,. _..,, 
.. - -- ,,, . -
---··· -·• ·-
- . .., ., 
,,,.. 
- .. _ ....... 
·- - .... --- . 
.. ----
___ 
...
STUVWXY=:::::::::::::::::::::::::::t,·- Z -
-· --
Concentual Elevations 
' 
,;,,ws-,m,rn•M••••x"t''"''"""'"•••u••·••••~• •••••--••v• •• --~,;.----w-
""''i' 
• • 
•,.,,,,,._,.,_,,;"''""'"'x"•=•· "" "'""'""" 
Southern 
Pho e ni.x , 
Ariz o n a 
0 
8 
4 
16 
CITY OF PHOENIX 
MAY 2 0 2008 
Planning Department 
. _•· KTGY GROUP, INC,
ARCHITF.CTURE: 
PLANNING 
"("7···!,·"·9·-. 2··-
M 1 ·•7' C H E L. L 
••-•· S O U T H
I R 
V I N 
E, C A L I F O R 
N 1 A· 
9 2_ 6 1 4
{949) 851- 2133 
FAX' (949) 851-5156
i¢.;. 1999 
ALL. RIGHTS RESERVED 
02-19-2008
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022
Stipulated Elevations

SUN WEST PROPERTIES 
3333 N. 44th St. 
Phoenix, AZ 85018 
K.TOY NO. 20070893
-- ::;.;;;;,,- ,,..,,,-
_, ' y,,.,.  
'-,;_ .,_, {' 
"... 
 
..... ,,.,.,,....'(,,....,.-'l:'.· ...,.,,.-., .. . - . " ' '" "'"""'-,;, .,. , - )
'T. 
-
..
..
..
 .....,,,,.,.. 
,., 
-
....,,,. 
--
;. 
-.,,...............,, .. h 
.. -
. 
' .. ··: -. --  "
,.......,,-_.,,.,.,,, 
.-- ‘ .,.,._ ., .. , 
.. "' ---- " \, 
...... -. '
,-- ,.,._, 't<''• ,--1''""'i":""""-'" 
·::=- _. r '-·'""'""" 
· .. ,-.,_
+ 
.  _,
"" ’ _ 
.... .,;..--,.,.__ -“ 
.·· 
....
" 
_ . ..----·-- ---"'--.____,,. ex{, l,Jb1ff,. l	fVf?.e 
i 
rAAi?I b 
·,.,ir. ­

 Tl lJE; \OJ· { N>.
,; 
' 
'. 
', 
_., "7 f O J--0 
_ __,;, :e,f-1.'; Pt?,
. 
;	(
b 

,,-- tli,f, k. lAP
Su;, p,ts;,• 
E-;;:::---
-. :.7 .:::-:-::-'-(-),;;;:;,:::_-: *- ·. .. + :,.,,,_ -, ... . -.·. - - - _,,,, ·
___ ...,,. 
.,,,....,_,6-,,, -., 
, 
-
'.....,,..,.,.,.,7 
8 
......, 
, 
n "-+ , 
'.' 
""' 
9 
, 
" 
""t 
: 
"" 
•• 
. . 
. 
· Conptttal•Elevatiorts
; . 
. -"'­
-
.. . -' 
-¥::,. -:., ¦ 
- · · J,. Tfe# "'?lol/
Jb 
/
✓ 
/
,· 
..... •. 
. 
. 
. 
.· .. · 
/ 
	M.f, "':?itfbl-e- P--
·UV(T/ c:uruop.
,. *- -"""" ·-,. .......,.,.. ·""""' "' ......,.,._ ..,.. 
-c-......;.---,,,1-r....✓" 
-
' 
,,., ' __,..,.._ 
. ” ----
' 
_.,. 
=j•-••
.
-...--k•rnwm,,,,,. ,,,, ... ,,V>'..,,,,,.-,. 
! """ 
l. 
--• 1.::· .. ..,...,,, •. • 
,. 
.. • --- - -– ''\ 
,.,,,...,. 
' . ,, — ' ... .,, 
˜ 
™"' 
š- -.. .,,,..,....,.›- ... --
, __ 
... _ 
œ 
. . 
_.,. 
. . 
·-
"'  -
.. ž 	-
"'Ÿ 
•·" 
_,., ,:..., ,_..,._, 
,._ "'· -  
-"'">ii.•" 
' 
., ,. '""'''''"""" -.-'\ -"¡ ......... 
+-'
'--.,,-•,-'--I 
'1 
---4--.,.,, 
-5 
¢ 
.%	
.,,.,.-, ,. 
£ 
¤· 
. 
' 
. 
· .. ·. 
. 
0 
8 
4 
16 
0 thern 
KTGY GROUP, !NC,
I 
A,CC'HJ.fT:?;CT_ttDE.•·. 
__ .
_ 
PLA _ _NN'..!;E.Ci< 
l'tt0;1 
MIYCH!tkL 
SOU 
Ii 
·
IRVIMfi'.,
CIIL!l"ORNIA 
921114 
Phoe n 1 X ,

·riz o n a 
!94'1,i} es1-;;n;l'.'.,.\ 
·FAX {949) !)t'lf,!'1--Ht-,tt
19,9 
AU. '<1(;lff1> RtrolVE.l:I
02-19,2008
CITY OF PHOENIX 
MAY 20 2008 
Planning Department 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022
Stipulated Elevations

JUL 2 5 2008 
PLANi\l!NG DEPT. 
.2nd fl. RECEPTION 
PLANT SCHEDULE 
I SYMBOL 
BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME 
mtES 
SAI.VAG[O TREE FROM ONSITE 
VARIOUS 
ACACIA l'ilLLAROtANA 
PALO BLANCO 
CERClOIU!J PRAECOX 
PALO BREA 
PROSOP!S CH!L[NS!S 'THORNLESS' 
THORNLESS CHILEAN MESQUITE 
DAI.SERGIA S!SSOO 
SISSOO TREE 
SHRUBS 
BOUGAINVILLEA S. "BARBARA KARST" 
BARBARA KARST BOUCAINVIU.EA 
CAESALPJNIA !J[XICANA 
I.IEXICAN BIRO o;:- PARol.QISE 
LEUCOPHYUUI.A CANOIOUIĤ 'SILVER CLOUD'tm 
SIL'-1:R CLOUD SAGE 
LEUCOPHY\..LUM rnurtSC(NS 'GREEN CLOUD' 
GREEN CLOUD SAGE 
RU[LLIA P[NINSULARIS 
BAJA REUWA 
TECOMA SPP. 
'ORANG( JU91L((' 
SIZE 
VAA![S 
-ta· aox 
36" aox 
24" BOX 
48" BOX 
5 GAL 
5 GAL 
5 GAL. 
5 CAL. 
SYMBOL 
BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME 
SIZE 
@ 
(!) 
<l) 
e, 
m " 
0 
ACCENTS 
ACAY£ GEI.IINIFLORA 
5 GAL. 
TWIN-FLOWERED AGAVE 
HESPERALOE PARVIF"l.ORA 
5 GAL. 
RED YUCCA 
MUHLENBERGIA CAPILARIS 'REGAL MIST' 
5 GAL, 
REGAL IJ/ST DEER GRASS 
GROUNDCOVER 
8ACCHARIS HYBRID 'STARN' 
1 GAL. 
OESERT BROOM HYBR!D 
VERBENA 'SUMI.IERTII.IE BEAUTY' 
I CAL. 
SUMMERTIME BEAUTY VERBENA 
LANTANA SPP. 
1 GAL 
'N[W COLO' LANTAN,\ 
LANTANA MONTE\r10ENSlS 
1GAL 
PURPLE TRAIUNC LANTANA 
RU[LUA SRITTON!A."-IA 'KATIE' 
1 GAL. 
DWARJ:' RU[LUA 
MATERI AL 
D[COIJĥgiĦsħ
R:ĨĩĪN' 
īĬEitĭV
5PAVEĮENT' 
į 
We.A ™i ... 1İıIJ1cE!r°'JLDERS 
l lfcii 1vJ#N 
ijĴCthi£ARK FINISH 
NOTE: 
LANDSCAPE TO BE WATERED BY AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 
NOTE: 
TREES SHALL MEET SPECIFIED CALIPER SIZE WITHIN ONE YEAR or INSTALLATION DATE. 
NOTE: TREE HEIGHTS ANO CALIPERS WILL COMPLY WITH ftAR!ZONA NURSERY ASSOCIATION 
SPECrJ:'ICATIONS
ft FOR THAT TYPE AND SIZE OF TREE 
NOTE: PL.ANT PALATE ANO LANDSCAPE DESIGN SUPPORTS THE CITY OF PEORIA'S LAKE PLEASANT 
PARKWAY DESIGN THEME I.IANUAL FOR THE URBAN/COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA. 
j...., 
' 
% 
PRELIMINARY 
LANDSCAPE PLAN 

 
o-==="-,o=-=='-•=o'"'"'=-,c.:,
...co __ 16-
0 ,-., 
SCALE: 1· .. 40•-o· 
{f) z 
0 
{f)  
IY 5 
r\ 
<C ll 
Cl. z 
v 
llll N. hll 'lo,,., 
"""""'•A•>.<ml 
w 
IY 
0  
..J 
CJ 
T Ml.W-•ĵl! 
,wiu.._,>(17 
·••;ffit•-•.,.V>I 
rM.U•U'<Anr 
U,/<DKArf.l'U.,. 
LlOO 
!2 
 
C 5 
PHO-1-22--Z-51-08-7
Stipulated Landscape Plan
Hearing Date: April 20, 2022

Planning Commission Minutes for August 13, 2008                                                            page 
Rezoning Cases 
Application # Z-51-08-7 (Companion cases GPA-LV-2-08-7, Z-49-08-7) 
 
 
 
1
Application #: 
Z-51-08-7 (Companion cases GPA-LV-2-08-7, Z-49-08-7) 
From: 
Rural-43 (Pending S-1) 
To: 
C-1, R-4 
Acreage: 
14.38 
Location: 
Approximately 1500 feet south of the southwest corner of 35th 
Avenue and Southern Avenue 
Proposal: 
Neighborhood commercial/multi-family residential 
Applicant: 
Sun West Properties - Rob LaGrone 
Owner: 
Laveen Elementary School District No. 59 
Representative: 
Rob LaGrone 
 
Mr. Alan Stephenson presented Mr. Jacob Zonn who is the Laveen Village Planner to 
present items 2, 3 and 4 which are companion cases and can be heard together, but 
separate actions will be needed for each item.  
 
GPA-LV-2-08-7 is a request to designate 14.75 acres located approximately 1,500 feet 
south of the southwest corner of 35th Avenue and Southern Avenue to Residential 15+ 
and Commercial from the current designation of Residential 3.5-5 per acre.  Staff 
recommends approval of this request and finds that the multi-family designation will 
support commercial activities at the intersection and the proposed commercial 
designation is consistent with the existing designation to the north of the property.  The 
Laveen Village Planning Committee approved this case on August 11, 2008; 4-2-1.  The 
concurrent equivalency zoning case Z-49-08-7 is a request for S-1 from County Rural-
43 to establish equivalent City of Phoenix zoning for annexation #414 (G-5147).  Staff 
recommends approval of this request.  Concurrent equivalency zoning case Z-51-08-7 
is a request for C-1 on 3.84 acres and R-4 on 10.54 acres that will allow for 
neighborhood, commercial, and multi-family housing.  The Laveen Village Planning 
Committee approved the case 4-2-1 on August 11, 2008 with staff stipulations as well 
as additional stipulations in regards of landscape buffering and fencing to screen the 
adjacent residential neighborhoods.  Staff recommends approval of this request in 
finding it provides for a variety of housing projects and price options for the Laveen 
Village by creating a mix of uses allowing pedestrian activities between the sites. 
 
Commissioner Gallegos is now present through tele-conferencing. 
 
Mr. Robert LaGrone, 4465 E. Paradise Village Parkway South, Unit 1132, stated he is 
here on behalf of his three partners at Sun West Properties, a community based 
development partnership.  The site plans before the Commission this evening 
represented a year’s work with the LCRD.  When the site was originally purchased they 
were looking at its commercial potential than the residential.  
 
It is adjacent to a very nice busy shopping center in a C-2 zone, in fact the developer of 
the shopping center had attempted to purchase the property before they had.  The uses 
that looked viable, according to the market study, were a bit too intense to provide a 
proper transition from the C-2 uses to the north, the residential uses to the west, and 
also the ones to the south.  They were looking a more mixed use model to provide a

Planning Commission Minutes for August 13, 2008                                                            page 
Rezoning Cases 
Application # Z-51-08-7 (Companion cases GPA-LV-2-08-7, Z-49-08-7) 
 
 
 
2
good transition; both behind and in front of the frontage.  The two parcels were 
purchased from the school district and some private owners.  The goal this evening is to 
establish that this is an appropriate use that is a good fit for the community, Laveen as a 
whole, and for the market. Included is 11 acres of multi-family behind 2 neighborhood 
C-1 retail pads at the front.  The multi-family housing provides a nice transition in 
intensity and density.  The commercial provides a nice step-down in intensity of 
commercial and also take some pressure off of the multi-family behind that.  Also, it will 
prevent having multi-family right next to the footage where people are living next to a lot 
of noise.  This will put in a little more neighborhood commercial that does not 
necessarily want to be in a large shopping center but closer to the neighborhoods.  
Some very viable commercial was found that extends much further from a major 
intersection than their project will.  On 51st Avenue and Baseline with 2,500 feet from 
the corner, are still very appropriate uses.    
 
The goal is to distribute jobs and housing in each village so that people can live and 
work in the same village.  It was heard from the school district that there are a lot of 
school teachers that have to commute long distances, as far as Ahwatukee and 
Glendale, because they could not find a home that they could afford in Laveen.  At build 
out it is expected that the community at 35th Avenue and Southern Avenue to have 
upwards of 1,000 jobs.  This makes it a natural fit to have housing so people do not 
have to commute as far, in some cases there will also be shopping amenities.  In more 
urban areas mixed use tends to be a bit more vertigo in some of the dense areas.  You 
will see multi-family above retail.  Laveen is a little less intense and spread out.  
Commercial is open enough to provide a nice view corridor to the multi-family to be 
visible from the street for marketing purposes.  Last October at one of the community 
meetings, concerns were expressed about the site lines.  Suggestions were taken and 
incorporated in the plans.  Landscaping of the public area, which they will seek from the 
city, may be just grass, they have agreed to put in a row of mature tress to screen the 
apartments from the neighborhood homes.  They have also agreed to seek a variance 
to put in a very nice 8-foot ornamental fence.  Due to a quirk in the zoning, this is seen 
as a front set-back for zoning purposes were only a 3-foot fence is allowed by code.   
 
Phil Hertel, 2300 W Broadway, stated it is rare when the LCRD brings to the Village 
support for high density, intense residential uses.  The Village has reviewed and 
considered this apartment based application.  The reason it was supported is because it 
fits.  It is an ideal use; it is next to the Wal-Mart Super center and adjacent to retail 
opportunities.  It also has mass transit availability and employment opportunities.  There 
was some concern about over commercializing the corner, however, because this 
commercial is intended to be service related, it actually fits well with the apartments plus 
it acts as a buffer so the apartments do not front onto 35th Avenue.  Through very 
restrictive stipulations, the Village put together support so that this would develop as it 
was discussed.  There were also very detailed stipulations for the residential.  There is 
an error in the stipulations that staff provided from the Village.  In 13a, “in the second 
line, decorated block wall or” should be deleted and in 13b towards the end, the words 
“blocked wall” should be deleted.  That refers to the fence along the western property 
line that was talked about being a view fence.  They did not want to offer an opportunity

Planning Commission Minutes for August 13, 2008                                                            page 
Rezoning Cases 
Application # Z-51-08-7 (Companion cases GPA-LV-2-08-7, Z-49-08-7) 
 
 
 
3
for an 8 foot “graffiti easel” across the back of the property.  Village stipulations 19 and 
22 that were supported from the Village did not make it through the process; they have 
been assured that these are covered in other areas so they are comfortable with that.   
 
Steven Klein, 6820 S. 66th Avenue, Laveen, stated he represents LCRD.  They met 
numerous times with the applicant and they thought long and hard about this project.  
Mr. Klein agrees with Mr. Hertel that this is the appropriate place for this commercial 
project.  It would provide a transition and a buffer from the intense comm. center to the 
less intense residential uses as it moves down further south on 35th Avenue.  The 
overall benefit for the community is better than a lot of others things that could have 
gone there.  Mr. Klein would like to have one name added to the staff report for persons 
to be contacted.  That would be Randy Raskin of Arizona Development. 
 
Jon Kimoto, 3216 W Ansell Road, Laveen, stated he has been involved with this project 
since the initial design back in October 2007.  To the credit of Sun West, they did 
involve the community early in this process and did take many suggestions and 
implemented them.  From 1986 to 2002 there were only 29 acres designated on the 
northwest corner at this intersection for commercial C-2 development.  Within the last 5 
years 85 acres have been gained in which the original 29 acres are included.  The 
center of gravity shifted 51st Avenue and Baseline Road to 35th Avenue and Southern 
Avenue.  They have obtained at least 709,000 feet of retail.  In order to justify the 
survivability of this much retail, the density and intensity is needed in this corner. 
 
Mike Curley, 3101 N. Central Avenue, stated he is representing the owners of the 40 
acre piece just north of the Wal-Mart.  They are not opposed to the multi-family per say, 
but they are opposed to the commercial frontage.  There is an overabundance of 
commercial in this intersection.  There is a staggering amount of not only zoned 
property but built commercial development that currently is vacant.  An example is the 
Mervyns site directly to the north of the Wal-Mart site with 50,000 square feet of space 
that has been built with 1,500 square feet of it vacant.  The site plans consist of two 
pads that are in the front of the plan with  
 
the multi-family buried behind the pads.  Mr. Curley believes that by not having some 
type of window out on 35th Avenue, the multi-family will be a marginal type of 
development or remain vacant.  Within the last 5 years Mr. Curly has been involved with 
about 20 multi-family projects throughout the valley, presenting multi-family developers 
that are generally considered to be “A” developers.  The multi-family developers look for 
a marketing window, a presence, such as the retail developers.  This area does not 
need an “E” or “C” type of multi-family developer, and this is what the area needs.  Mr. 
Curley believes those in favor do have the village’s best interest at heart but thinks there 
is a lack of understanding to some degree on what the needs are to ensure that a multi-
family development is successful.  Lastly, once this area is zoned C-1 is can be any use 
that is allowed in the C-1 zoning district, as long as they meet the building footprints.  
Mr. Curley suggested approving the R-4, deny the C-1, and approve the C-1 portion as 
an R-3 development because R-3 is allowed within the C-1.  This would allow full multi-
family development of the site.

Planning Commission Minutes for August 13, 2008                                                            page 
Rezoning Cases 
Application # Z-51-08-7 (Companion cases GPA-LV-2-08-7, Z-49-08-7) 
 
 
 
4
 
Scott Davis, 11811 N. Tatum Boulevard, stated he is here to represent himself and 
partners of the Wal-Mart site.  They are here to oppose the commercial component.  
They have come to the conclusion that because of the massive amount of retail and 
commercial that is already zoned there, it would not work for them.  He truly believes 
those in favor do not have a handle of how much commercially zoned and retail 
property there is.  Currently there is over one million square feet of retail and vacant 
land within 2 miles of 35th Avenue.  The Super Wal-Mart site is the largest retail in the 
country and the largest draw for retail tenant.  They have been marketing this site for 18 
months and have yet to get to 60% leased.  This year they are minus 3,000 square feet.  
This gives the idea of the market ability of this retail site.  One lease of 19,000 square 
feet has been acquired this year but they have lost 4,000 square feet.  The northwest 
corner, the Mervyns site, is currently zoned for 239,000 square foot of retail.  This has 
been marketed for 1 year and currently have 3% of the retail site leased.  
 
Randy Jones, 3006 W. Maldonado Road, stated he is here to oppose the multi-family 
dwelling proposed.  The Sun West representative mentioned community involvement.  
He was at the meeting and they stated to lay out how they would like to see it and 
everyone’s idea was very low density.  On the corner of 27th Avenue, south of Bernard 
Black School, there is an approved 150 units, 59th Avenue and Baseline also has an 
approved apartment complex.  The fact that these have not been built out does not 
mean more of these projects should be approved.  In regards to the Arizona Republic 
article it stated that any units 50 or greater have about a 12.5 vacancy rate and for the 
price of a 990 square foot apartment, a home could be rented.  Laveen is no different.  
Transportation is limited, there is no night life and the jobs are just not there.  Given 
these reason he is asking for a denial on the GPA and zoning cases. 
 
James Sedillo, 2945 W Olea Avenue, stated this is a poor investment in his community.  
He and his family just moved to Laveen from Tempe.  The schools are underperforming 
and there is a high turn-over rate with the teacher.  Mr. Sedillo believes more single-
family homes should be built instead of apartments.  There are stops signs that are 
congested every morning, where traffic lights should be.  For the community he asked 
that this project be denied.  More commercial is needed for example a Costco, Sports 
Authority or maybe even a Gymnastic center.   
 
The following submitted cards in opposition but did not wish to speak. 
 
Jim Wehmueller, 11811 N. Tatum Blvd. 
Jennifer Jones, 3006 W. Maldonado Road 
Craig James, 5110 N. 40th Street, #100 
Paul Barnes, 5518 E. Mariposa Street 
David Mashn, 3728 W. Leodra Lane 
Janet Gidney, 3102 W. Ryan Lane 
Jon James, 5110 N. 40th Street, #100 
Cyd Manning, 3220 W. Ceton Drive 
Randy Raskin, 5110 N. 40th Street, #100

Planning Commission Minutes for August 13, 2008                                                            page 
Rezoning Cases 
Application # Z-51-08-7 (Companion cases GPA-LV-2-08-7, Z-49-08-7) 
 
 
 
5
 
Mr. Robert LaGrone addressed that the commercial pads are a good fit and transitional 
use with C-1 fairly low intensity commercial.  These are just two pad site with three 
major shopping centers with one being approved and set to go when the time is right.  
They have 50% spoken for already.  The impact on the overall commercial 
neighborhood is minimal.  The impact on their site is very beneficial; this takes the 
pressure off of residential and not as many need to be built.  As for the harm to the 
apartments, Clarke-Wayland Company has built for excellent apartment developers; 
they do not like building a product that will not do well.  They like the site plan as it is.  
These apartments will not be ready for occupancy for a couple of years, by then there 
will be further development in Laveen, retail will recover a bit and the vacant homes 
bought by investors will be sold. 
 
Commissioner Shields stated he thinks it is remarkable that the developer did such a 
good job working with the LCRD in Laveen.  He believes this is a compromise because 
it makes sense to buffer lower density, high density residential.  It is not a good 
apartment site.  He does not see that behind commercial uses.  The commercial use 
and down road something else has to be done on the residential piece.  He cannot 
support this use on the property, he would support it all being residential apartment.  
Tucked back behind commercial does not make sense.  
 
Commissioner Gallegos stated she agrees with Commissioner Shields.  Because of the 
mass amount of commercial at this site, where will people live?  The apartment complex 
will be buried behind the commercial.  Residential does front elsewhere throughout the 
valley, it is ok.  Commissioner Gallegos agrees with Mr. Curley’s suggestion.   
 
Commissioner Gullett stated he believes developers who work with the community 
should be supported.  They have tried to come up with a compromise solution.   
 
Commissioner Gullett made a MOTION to approve Z-51-08-7 per the staff memo of 
August 13, 2008 with the following changes that would be done to address issues 
raised by the neighbors in this area with modification of stipulation #13a to read “That 
the owner shall file for and pursue a variance to allow for a maximum 8-foot ornamental 
iron view fence on the western property line”.  Also for the addition to stipulation 18e to 
add Randy Raskin, 5110 north 40th street suite 100, Phoenix, AZ 85018. 
 
Commissioner Ellis SECONDED. 
 
There being no further discussion, Chairman Keuth called for a vote and the MOTION 
PASSED 5-4 (Shields, Gallegos, Davis, Awai). 
 
 
* * * *

Planning Commission Minutes for August 13, 2008                                                            page 
Rezoning Cases 
Application # Z-51-08-7 (Companion cases GPA-LV-2-08-7, Z-49-08-7) 
 
 
 
6
 
Stipulations 
 
1. 
That the development shall be in general conformance with the residential 
elevations date stamped May 20, 2008 and the site plan date stamped August 
11, 2008, as modified by the following stipulations and approved by the 
Development Services Department with specific regard to the following: 
 
a. 
That the commercial building to the north be a maximum of 5300 square 
feet. 
 
b. 
That the commercial building to the south be a maximum of 6700 square 
feet. 
 
c. 
That the ornamental iron view fence not exceed 8 feet in height on the 
western perimeter. 
 
2. 
That the elevations for the commercial pads shall be approved by the Planning 
Hearing Officer through the public hearing process prior to Development Services 
Department preliminary site plan approval. This review is for conceptual purposes 
only. Specific development standards and requirements will be determined by the 
Development Services Department.  
 
3. 
That landscaping shall be in general conformance with the conceptual 
landscaping plan date stamped July 25, 2008, with the addition of landscape 
diamonds provided approximately every 6 stalls in the commercial and guest 
residential parking areas, as approved or modified by the Development Services 
Department. 
 
4. 
That the perimeter wall shall include material and textural differences, such as 
stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such as tile, glass insets, 
or stamped designs, as approved by the Development Services Department. 
 
5. 
That all pedestrian walkways shall be shaded and connect all residential buildings 
to project amenities, commercial pads to the east and the commercial site to the 
north, as approved by the Development Services Department. 
 
6. 
That the developer shall conduct archaeological monitoring and/or testing by a 
qualified archaeologist within all areas of the development prior to clearing and 
grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading, as approved or modified by the City 
Archaeologist.  Further data recovery may be necessary based on results of the 
testing. 
 
7. 
That the property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and 
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to future 
owners or tenants of the property.  The form and content of such documents shall

Planning Commission Minutes for August 13, 2008                                                            page 
Rezoning Cases 
Application # Z-51-08-7 (Companion cases GPA-LV-2-08-7, Z-49-08-7) 
 
 
 
7
be according to the templates and instructions provided, which have been 
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. 
 
8. 
That right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the west half of 35th 
Avenue, as approved by the Development Services Department. 
 
9. 
That right-of-way totaling 25 feet shall be dedicated for the east half of 37th 
Avenue, as approved by the Development Services Department. 
 
10. 
That the developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the 
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median 
islands, landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the 
Development Services Department.  All improvements shall comply with all ADA 
accessibility standards. 
 
11. 
That the applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project Information 
Form for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to the Street 
Transportation Department.  This form is a requirement of the EPA to meet clean 
air quality requirements. 
 
12. 
That the maximum number of residential units shall not exceed 276. 
 
13. 
That the western property area shall be designed in the following manner as 
approved or modified by the Development Services Department:   
 
a. 
That owner shall file for and pursue a variance to allow for a maximum 8-
foot decorative block wall or ornamental iron view fence on the western 
property line. as depicted on the landscape blowup exhibit date stamped 
August 13, 2008; 
 
b. 
Minimum 8-foot wide landscape setback between the block wall/view fence 
and the proposed parking structures along the western perimeter 
(additional landscaping shall occur outside the perimeter fence); 
 
c. 
Covered parking spaces adjacent to required view fencing, located on the 
west end of the property shall be screened from the residential properties 
to the west of the site.  The screening method shall consist of either 
landscaping or a wall attached to the parking canopy;   
 
d. 
A mixture of 75% 4 to 6-inch caliper trees within the landscaped setback 
shall be planted to act as a visual buffer between the western most 
apartment buildings and the residential properties to the west. 
 
14. 
That mature trees shall be salvaged and utilized within all the landscape setbacks 
with specific regard to placement of the larger specimens within the western 
landscape setback as approved by the Development Services Department.

Planning Commission Minutes for August 13, 2008                                                            page 
Rezoning Cases 
Application # Z-51-08-7 (Companion cases GPA-LV-2-08-7, Z-49-08-7) 
 
 
 
8
 
15. 
That the applicant shall provide a minimum 15-foot landscape setback along the 
southern perimeter of the property.  The setback shall be landscaped with a 
staggered double row of a 75% mixture of 3 to 6-inch caliper trees planted 
approximately 25-feet on center as approved by the Development Services 
Department. 
 
16. 
That the final landscape plan, lighting plan, and sign package for the commercial 
and residential project shall be submitted to the Laveen Village Planning 
Committee for review and comment prior to preliminary site plan approval by the 
Development Services Department.  That all signs shall not exceed 6-feet in 
height as approved by the Development Services Department. 
 
17. 
That the parking lot screen wall and landscape pallet within the 35th avenue 
landscaped setback shall compliment the adjacent existing development to the 
north and be compatible in color, texture, form and materials as approved by the 
Development Services Department. 
 
18. 
That the applicant shall notify the following individuals 15 days prior to any of the 
following events, Preliminary site plan review meeting, Zoning Adjustment hearing 
or Planning Hearing Officer hearing. 
 
a. 
Steven Klein - 6820 S. 66th Ave., Laveen, AZ  85339 
b. 
Phil Hertel - 2300 W. Broadway Rd., Phoenix, AZ  85041 
c. 
Jon Kimoto - 3216 W. Ansell Rd., Laveen, AZ  85339 
d. 
Mark Williams - 7150 E. Camelback Rd. #285, Scottsdale, AZ  85251 
E. 
RANDY RASKIN – 5110 NORTH 40TH STREET SUITE 100, PHOENIX, 
AZ 85018 
 
 
 
******************************************************************************************** 
Commissioner Gallegos ends meeting participation via tele-conferencing. 
********************************************************************************************

VOTE 6-0 (Mr Williams declared a conflict of interest) 
DISCUSSION 
Mr Zonn presented the Village Planning Committee m1t1ated General Plan 
Amendment Staff stated that the request Is a clean up to provide 
consistency between the proposed des1gnat1on of Res1dent1al 3 5-5 du/acre 
and the R1-8 zoning entitled in the 2-165-06 7 rezoning case 
5 members of the pubhc submitted comment cards in favor of the request 
5 
Presentation d1scuss1on and possible recommendation on GPA-LV-2-08 7 A
request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map des1gnat1on from Restdent1al 
3 5-5 du/ac to Res1dent1al 15+ du/ac and Commercial for approximately 14 75
acres located approximately 1500 feet south of the southwest corner of 35th 
Avenue and Southern Avenue Presentation by Rob LaGrone Sun West 
Properties The Planning Comm,ssJOn will review this request on August 13, 2008 
This Item was discussed m tandem with agenda item #6 
MOTION Mr Hertel motioned to approve as presented by staff with the 
following finding This case involves two companion zoning changes 
Support Is for both changes together Support 1s not intended for one 
without the other Motion of support for the General Plan Amendment 
includes cons1derat1on of the companion case 
VOTE 4-2 (Mr Lines declared a conflict of interest) 
DISCUSSION 
Mr Zonn gave a brief overview of the project location, staffs 
recommendation and st1pulat1ons Mr LaGrone presented the community 
involvement process and discussed the site plan, elevations and landscape 
plan developed from those d1scuss1on in detail Landscape buffering, view 
corridors, screening and possible variances that would need to be applied 
for 
6 members of the public spoke m opposItIon with concerns of 
overpopulation with the lack of infrastructure (police, fire, etc ) throughout 
the village, density and over saturation of commercial An add1t1onal 8 
members of the public submitted oppos1tIon cards Mr Steven Klem of the 
Laveen Committee for Responsible Development (LCRD) spoke in favor of 
the request Mr Mike Curley represented the property owner to the north of 
the subject site and stated that the property owner Is in oppos1t1on to the 
commercial portion because vacancy rates in the surrounding area are 
already too low The property owner Rand Raskin and Scott Davis also 
spoke m opposItIon and stated that they have been working with the 
applicant to create a deed restriction on the type of retail allowed on the site 
The applicant and Dr 8111 Johnson of the Laveen Elementary School District, 
which Is the property owner, stated that a deed restriction could take a long 
time to resolve because of the school d1stnct's involvement 
Committee members had concerns of the applicant's mtent1ons and 
possible uses of the commercial site The applicant assured the committee 
that they are only pursuing service type retail 
Laveen Village Planning Committee Minutes - August 11, 2008

6 
Presentation d1s.s1on and possible recommendation. Z 51-08-7, a request to
rezone from S 1 to R-4 (10 54 acres) and C-1 (3 84 acres) for multi family 
res1dent1al and neighborhood commercial development on 14 38 acres located 
approximately 1500 feet south of the southwest corner of 35th Avenue and
Southern Avenue Presentation by Rob LaGrone Sun West Properties
The Plannmg Comm1ss1on will review this request on August 13, 2008 
This Item was discussed m tandem with agenda item #5
MOTION Mr Hertel motioned to approve with modified staff st1pulat1ons 1
and 3, add1t1onal stipulations 12-22, ang the following findings 
1 The commercial portion of this development can compliment the high
density res1dent1al development With over 85 acres of large scale retail
commercial on the surrounding properties, this site should provide the 
opportunity for service related commercial uses such as, but not limited to ,
banks, restaurants, office, urgent care, day care, or uses whose primary 
business does not sell products and carries no inventory to sell as the main
source of revenue The site plan provided will allow for those users 
2 The multi family portion fits well adJacent to the area retail centers, 
destinations of mass transit, employment opportunities, and the close 
prox1m1ty to the downtown area Stipulations to the site plan, landscape 
plan, and building elevations should help to provide high quality multi family
housing in an area of Laveen, that 1s both appropriate and in need of high
density housing 
3 The applicant has stated that an agreement has been reached with the
Laveen School District that as development occurs a Two Hundred dollar 
per res1dent1al unit donation will be made as res1dent1al building permits are
issued
Staff St1pulat1ons with mod1ficat1ons
1 That the development shall be in general conformance with the 
res1dent1al elevations date stamped May 20, 2008 and the site plan date 
stamped August 11, 2008, as mod1f1ed by the following st1pulat1ons and 
approved by the Development Services Department with specific regard to
the following
a That the commercial bwldmg to the north be a maximum of 5300 square 
feet 
b That the commercial bwldmg to the south be a maximum of 6700 square
feet 
c That the ornamental iron view fence not exceed 8 feet m height on the 
western pertmeter 
2 That the elevations for the commercial pads shall be approved by the
Planning Hearing Officer through the public hearing process prior to 
Development Services Department prehmmary site plan approval This 
review 1s for conceptual purposes only Specific development standards and
requirements will be determined by the Development Services Department
3 That landscaping shall be in general conformance with the conceptual 
landscaping plan date stamped July 25, 2008, with the add,t,on of landscape
diamonds provided approximately every 6 stalls m the commerc,al and open 
Laveen Village Planning Committee Minutes - August 11, 2008

res1dent1al park1.areas, as approved or modified Ae Development 
Services Department 
4 That the perimeter wall shall include material and textural differences, 
such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such as 
tile, glass msets, or stamped designs, as approved by the Development 
Services Department 
5 That all pedestrian walkways shall be shaded and connect all res1dent1al 
buildings to project amenities, commercial pads to the east and the 
commercial site to the north, as approved by the Development Services 
Department 
6 That the developer shall conduct archaeological monitoring and/or 
testing by a qualified archaeologist w1thm all areas of the development prior 
to clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading, as approved or 
mod1f1ed by the City Archaeologist Further data recovery may be necessary 
based on results of the testing 
7 That the property owner shall record documents that disclose the 
existence, and operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor 
International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property The form 
and content of such documents shall be according to the templates and 
mstructIons provided, which have been reviewed and approved by the City 
Attorney 
8 That right-of way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the west half of 
35th Avenue, as approved by the Development Services Department 
9 That right-of-way totaling 25 feet shall be dedicated for the east half of 
37th Avenue, as approved by the Development Services Department 
1 O That the developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the 
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, 
median islands, landscaping and other mc1dentals as per plans approved by 
the Development Services Department All improvements shall comply with 
all ADA access1b11ity standards 
11 That the applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project 
Information Form for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to the 
Street Transportation Department This form Is a requirement of the EPA to 
meet clean air quality requirements 
Add1t1onal Village Planning Committee St1pulat1ons 
12 That the maximum number of res1dent1al units shall not exceed 276 
13 That there shall be an ornamental iron view fence on the western 
property line and that shall not exceed 8 feet in height 
14 That there shall be a minimum 8-foot landscape setback between the 
fence and the proposed parking structures along the western perimeter 
Laveen Village Planning Committee Minutes - August 11, 2008

{add1t1onal land.ping shall occur outside the per.ter fence), as
approved by Development Services Department
15 That there shall be a mixture of 4 to 6 mch caliper trees w1thm the west 
landscape buffer planted to act as a visual buffer between the western most 
apartment buildings and the res1dent1al properties to the west Initial size of
trees should serve to minImIze view opportunities from upper level of 
apartments to the adJacent res1dent1al properties That the applicant shall
try to utilize the existing mature landscaping to meet this requirement as
approved by Development Services Department
16 That the parking structures located on the west end of the property shall
be screened from the res1dent1al properties to the west of the site The 
screening method shall consist of either landscaping or a wall as approved
by Development Services Department
17 That the applicant shall provide a 15-foot landscape buffer along the 
southern perimeter of the property and that a double row of a mixture 3 to 6-
inch cahper trees shall be planted approximately 25 foot on center in two
staggered rows as approved by Development Services Department
18 That the final landscape plan, hghtmg plan, and s,gn package for the 
commercial and res1dent1al shall proJect be submitted to the Laveen Village
Planning Committee for review and comment prior to preliminary approval 
by the Development Services Department That all signs shall not exceed 6-
feet m height
19 That the commercial building elevations shall be presented to the 
Laveen Village Planning Committee prior to submittal to the Development
Services Department for prehmmary site plan approval
20 That the parking lot screen wall and landscape pallet along 35th avenue
shall compliment the adJacent existing development to the north and be
compatible m color, texture, form and materials
21 That any request to change or modify st1pulat1ons be preceded by 
presentation to the LVPC for review and comment prior to submittal to the
city
22 That the following people shall be notified for any request to change
st1pulat1ons or site plan Phil Hertel, Steven Klem, John Kamoto, Mark
Williams
VOTE 4-2 (Mr Lmes declared a conflict of interest)
DISCUSSION
See d1scuss1on under item #5
7 
Presentation d1scuss1on and possible recommendation on Z-67 08-7 a request to 
rezone from S-1 to R1-8 PRO for single-family res1dent1al on 1 06 acres located
approximately 1100 feet east of the Northeast corner of 59th Avenue &
Dobbins Road Presentation by Adam Baugh Withey Moms
Laveen Village Planning Committee Minutes - August 11, 2008

The Plannmg Conlss,on will review this request on Ai.1st 13 2008
MOTION Mr Norton motioned to approve with staff st1pulat1ons 
VOTE 7-0 
DISCUSSION 
Staff gave a bnef overview of the project location, staff's recommendation 
and st1pulat1ons Mr Baugh presented the request and stated that the 
applicant wishes to complete the surrounding development and be 
consistent with the adjacent lots 
Mr Klem from the LCRD and committee member Mr Hertel stated that they 
believed that the mtentIon of the applicant was to fit five 45-foot wide lots 
between two 55-foot lots The applicant stated that the adjacent lots have 
not been developed yet, so 10-feet would be taken from each adjacent lot m 
order to create the add1t1onal five lots, thus creating the consistency m lot 
sizes 
8 
Presentation d1scuss1on and possible recommendation on Z-54-08-7, a request to 
rezone from S-1 to R1-18 PRO for s1ngle-fam1ly res1dent1al development on 17 61
acres located approximately 900 feet south of the southeast corner of 51st 
Avenue and Elliot Road Presentation by Neal Pascoe, Beus Gilbert 
The Plannmg Comm1ss10n will review this request on September 10, 2008 
MOTION Mr Hertel motioned to approve with staff and add1t1onal village 
stipulations 
Add1t1onal Village Planning Committee St1pulat1ons 
11 That the maximum number of lots shall not exceed 14 
12 That 1f developed with private streets, bollard hghtmg shall be utilized 
for street hghtmg as approved by the Development Services 
Department 
13 That the landscape, hghtmg and sign plans shall be presented to the 
Village Planning Committee for review and comment prior to 
prehmmary site approval by the Development Services Department 
14 That all mechanical equipment such as satellite dishes and LP gas 
tanks shall be placed behmd screen walls as approved by the 
Development Services Department 
15 That any request to change or modify st1pulat1ons or the site plan 
shall be preceded by a presentation to the Laveen Village Planning 
Committee for review and comment prior to submittal to the city 
16 That all parcels wIthm the proJect shall be controlled by the h1lls1de 
standards m the city of Phoenix Zonmg Ordinance 
VOTE 6 1 
DISCUSSION 
Staff gave a bnef overview of the proJect location, staff's recommendation 
and st1pulat1ons Mr Pascoe discussed the h1lls1de oriented development, 
custom lots, and traffic pattern surrounding the site Committee members 
have been working with the applicant to create the add1t1onal st1pulat1ons 
Laveen Village Planning Committee Minutes - August 11, 2008