Attachment B - Staff Report - Z-78-21-8.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2022-05-11)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 37194 characters
Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
 
South Mountain Village Planning 
Committee Meeting Date 
March 8, 2022 
Planning Commission Hearing Date 
April 7, 2022 
Request From: 
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District), 
Approved C-1 (Neighborhood Retail District) 
(5.85 acres) 
Request To: 
C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District)  
(5.85 acres) 
Proposed Use 
Commercial uses 
Location 
Approximately 375 feet west of the southwest 
corner of 19th Avenue and Southern Avenue 
Owner 
Shops at South Mountain 
Applicant 
Shawn Valk, Platinum Construction 
Representative 
Taylor Earl, Earl & Curley, P.C. 
Staff Recommendation 
Approval, subject to stipulations 
 
General Plan Conformity 
General Plan Land Use Map 
Designation 
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre 
Street Map 
Classification 
19th Avenue 
Major Arterial Street 
50-foot west half street 
Southern Avenue 
Arterial Street 
55-foot south half street 
 
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE 
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local 
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods. 
 
The requested zoning will allow for increased intensity that is consistent in scale and 
character with the surrounding zoning in the area. The subject site is located at the 
intersection of two arterial streets where a mix of commercial zoning districts of various 
intensities exist. As stipulated, the proposed development will be respectful of local 
conditions by incorporating appropriate screening and development standards. 
 
 
 
 
Attachment B

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 2 of 14 
 
 
 
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE; 
CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new development or 
redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character of the surrounding 
neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development standards to prevent 
negative impact(s) on the residential properties. 
 
As stipulated, the proposed development will incorporate appropriate development 
standards that will mitigate impacts to adjacent residential uses. These standards will 
include enhanced landscaped setback standards, plus limitations on window and roll-up 
door locations. 
 
 
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE; 
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: New development should minimize surface parking areas and 
provide an abundance of shade through either trees or structures on any planned 
parking areas. 
 
As stipulated, the proposed development will incorporate shade standards for parking 
areas and public sidewalks. This will help to minimize the urban heat island effect, cooling 
the micro-climate of the site, and encouraging pedestrians to walk to and from this 
commercial site. 
 
 
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives 
 
Rio Montaña Area Plan: See Background Item No. 7. 
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 8. 
Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 9. 
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 10. 
Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 11.

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 3 of 14 
 
 
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning 
 
Land Use 
Zoning 
On Site 
Vacant 
R1-6 (Approved C-1) 
Northeast 
Gas station 
R1-6 (Approved C-1) 
North (across Southern 
Avenue) 
Vacant and gas station 
C-2 HGT/WVR 
DNS/WVR and PSC 
South 
Single-family residential 
R1-6 
East (across 19th Avenue) 
Single-family residential and 
commercial uses 
R1-6 and C-2 
West 
Single-family residential 
R1-6 
 
C-2 (Intermediate Commercial) 
Standards 
Requirements 
Met or Not Met 
Building Setbacks 
 
 
Street 
Minimum 20 feet, Average 
25 feet 
Minimum 25 feet (Met) 
Side (south and west) 
25 feet for 1-story buildings 
 
50 feet for 2-story buildings 
South 
1-story: 25 feet (Met) 
2-story: 87 feet (Met) 
 
West 
1-story: 25 feet (Met) 
2-story: 77 feet (Met) 
 
Side (northeast) 
None required 
25 feet (Met) 
Landscaped Setbacks 
 
 
Street 
Minimum 20 feet, Average 
25 feet 
25 feet (Met) 
Side (south and west) 
Minimum 10 feet 
25 feet (Met) 
Side (northeast) 
None required 
0 feet (Met) 
Lot Coverage 
Not to exceed 50% 
37% (Met) 
Building Height 
2 stories and 30 feet 
27 feet (Met) 
Parking 
Self-service storage facility: 
1 space per 35 storage units 
 
24 spaces required 
26 spaces (Met) 
*Site plan revision or variance required

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 4 of 14 
 
 
Background/Issues/Analysis 
 
SUBJECT SITE 
1. This request is to rezone a 5.85-acre site, located approximately 375 feet west of 
the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Southern Avenue from R1-6 (Single-
Family Residence District), Approved C-1 (Neighborhood Retail District) to C-2 
(Intermediate Commercial District) for commercial development. Companion 
rezoning Case No. Z-SP-7-21-8 seeks a special permit to allow a self-service 
storage facility and underlying C-2 uses. 
The subject site is an L-shaped lot with frontages on both 19th Avenue and 
Southern Avenue. It is zoned R1-6, but in 2005, City Council approved C-1 zoning 
for the subject site and the remainder of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and 
Southern Avenue under case Z-166-04. The portion of the rezoned area fronting on 
the corner was later developed with a gas station. The subject site was never 
developed. 
 
SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING 
2. The adjacent parcel to the northeast contains a gas station and is zoned R1-6, 
Approved C-1. Across Southern Avenue to the north is vacant land zoned C-2 
HGT/WVR DNS/WVR district and a gas station located within a PSC zoning district. 
 
East of the subject site, across 
19th Avenue, there are single-
family homes zoned R1-6 and 
various commercial uses at the 
corner of Southern Avenue 
zoned C-2. 
South and west of the subject 
site, there are single-family 
homes zoned R1-6. 
 
Existing Zoning Aerial Map, Source: City of Phoenix 
Planning and Development Department

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 5 of 14 
 
 
3. The General Plan Land Use 
Map designation for the 
subject site is Residential 2 to 
3.5 dwelling units per acre, as 
are the adjacent sites to the 
south and west. North and east 
of the subject site, across 
Southern Avenue and 19th 
Avenue are properties 
designated Commercial. 
Across 19th Avenue to the 
east, there are properties 
designated as Residential 3.5 
to 5 dwelling units per acre. 
 
Existing General Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix 
Planning and Development Department 
The C-2 zoning request is not consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map 
designation; however, because the site is less than 10 acres, a General Plan 
Amendment is not required. 
PROPOSAL 
 
4. The applicant proposes to develop a new self-service storage facility, consisting of 
one two-story building and five one-story drive-up storage buildings. The site would 
also provide 30 covered RV parking spaces. Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-SP-
7-21-8 seeks a special permit to allow a self-service storage facility and underlying  
C-2 uses. 
 
5. Elevations 
The conceptual building elevations depict both the two-story self-service storage 
building and a typical one-story drive-up storage building. The two-story structure 
will be just under 28 feet in height to the top of the parapet. The one-story structures 
will be just under 14 feet in height to the top of the parapet at most points. All entries 
are located along one side of each building, creating a distinct front and back side to 
each building.

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 6 of 14 
 
 
 
Conceptual Building Elevation (two-story building), Source RKAA Architects 
 
Conceptual Building Elevation (one-story building), Source RKAA Architects 
Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1 to require a variety of colors and materials, in 
addition to architectural embellishments and detailing. The stipulation would also 
prohibit loading doors from facing perimeter lot lines and prohibit windows from 
facing the residential property lines. This stipulation will ensure that the proposed 
development provides a uniform and visually appealing development and does not 
negatively impact the surrounding area.  
General conformance to the building elevations is not recommended by staff as the 
proposed site plan could change as discussed in more detail below, and as a result 
leading to revisions of the building elevations proposed by the applicant.

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 7 of 14 
 
 
6. Site Plan 
The conceptual site plan depicts a two-story structure located at the interior of the 
site and one-story buildings distributed along the perimeters. Vehicular access 
points are depicted along both Southern Avenue and 19th Avenue and a parking lot 
is located at the northern portion of the site. Landscaped setbacks will be provided 
along both street frontages and along the south plus west property lines. 
 
 
Conceptual Site Plan, Source: RKAA Architects 
 
 
Staff does not recommend general conformance to the conceptual site plan 
provided by the applicant, as the applicant may be required to provide an 
appropriate termination for the adjacent Lynne Lane Street stub, which could result 
in changes to the site plan.

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 8 of 14 
 
 
Staff recommends a minimum 25-foot-wide landscaped setbacks along the south 
and west property lines with two-inch caliper evergreen trees to help screen and 
provide a larger buffer from this new development. This is addressed in Stipulation 
No. 2. 
 
STUDIES AND POLICIES 
 
7. Rio Montaña Area Plan 
 
The Rio Montaña Area Plan 
encourages preservation of 
the rural character of the 
area and incorporates 
transition zones to protect 
desert and open space 
areas. The plan also 
encourages pedestrian and 
equestrian activities through 
a network of trails and 
aspires to develop a sense of 
community while 
encouraging investment in 
the community. 
 
Rio Montaña Area Plan, Source: Planning and Development 
Department 
 
The Rio Montaña Area Plan intends to accomplish this vision through seven goals 
that include: 
1. Promoting balanced, high quality development;  
2. Protecting and improving neighborhoods through maintenance, rehabilitation 
and infill projects; 
3. Keeping a distinctive character that reflects the diversity in its equestrian 
heritage, culture, history and architecture;  
4. Protecting the rural character, the Sonoran Desert and the riparian potential 
of the Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Project;  
5. Promoting future business development and economic growth;  
6. Developing the tourism industry through a wide range of opportunities; 
7. Providing a variety of transportation options. 
Although the proposed use is not consistent with the proposed land use envisioned 
in the Rio Montaña Area Plan of Residential (up to 4 dwelling units per acre), the 
proposed development will meet many of the goals of this plan by redeveloping a 
vacant property with a new business. As stipulated, the development will protect 
existing residential uses by providing a wider landscape setback with larger trees 
than required by the Zoning Ordinance along residential property lines. This is 
addressed in Stipulation No. 2.

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 9 of 14 
 
 
Furthermore, staff recommends that perimeter walls visible from adjacent public 
streets contain material and textural differences to enhance the area. This is 
addressed in Stipulation No. 3. 
 
8. Tree and Shade Master Plan 
 
 
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as 
infrastructure to ensure trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and 
development process. Sidewalks on street frontages should be detached from the 
curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide thermal 
comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. To contribute to 
future improvements of this site and the urban forest infrastructure, staff is 
recommending the following: 
• Uncovered surface parking areas shall be landscaped and provide a 
minimum of 25 percent shade (Stipulation No. 4); 
 
• All public sidewalks shall have a minimum of 75 percent shade provided by 
shade trees at maturity (Stipulation No. 5); and 
 
• Landscaping along the public streets, between the sidewalk and back of curb, 
will help provide plant coverage and increase shade (Stipulation No. 8). 
 
9. Complete Streets Guiding Principles 
 
 
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding 
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an 
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as 
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. Staff recommends Stipulation Nos. 6 
and 7 to provide bicycle parking and enhanced pedestrian pathways through the 
site. These stipulations will promote pedestrian and bicycle activity to the site and in 
the area. 
 
10. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan 
 
 
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to 
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. Bicycle 
lanes have been constructed along Southern Avenue and 19th Avenue. Staff 
recommends that two bicycle parking spaces be provided and installed per the 
requirements of the Walkable Urban Code.  This is addressed in Stipulation No. 7. 
 
11. Zero Waste PHX 
 
 
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to 
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 10 of 14 
 
 
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and 
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the 
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of 
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, industrial, and mixed-use 
developments meeting certain criteria. No provisions for recycling containers were 
depicted on the site plan or described in the application documents.  
 
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY 
 
12. From the time the case was filed to the time the staff report was written, staff has 
received one letter from the public in opposition. The letter noted concerns about 
increased traffic in the area, impacts to wildlife, impacts on property values, and a 
lack of local economic benefit. 
 
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS 
13. The Street Transportation Department requires a minimum five-foot-wide detached 
sidewalks be provided along public streets with a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape 
island between the curb and back of sidewalk. In addition, the developer shall 
construct all streets within and adjacent to the subject site in accordance with ADA 
standards. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 8 and 9. 
 
14. The Aviation Department requires that the property owner record a Notice to 
Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport in order to disclose the existence, 
and operational characteristics of City of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport 
(PHX) to future owners or tenants of the property. Furthermore, that Form 7460-1 be 
filed for the development and that the development receive a “No Hazard 
Determination” from the FAA, if required. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 
10 and 11. 
 
15. The Water Services Department commented that the property has existing water 
and sewers mains that can potentially serve the development. In addition, the Water 
Services Department commented that capacity is a dynamic condition that can 
change over time due to a variety of factors. 
 
16. The Floodplain Management division of the Public Works Department did not have 
any comments on this proposal. 
 
17. The Public Transit Department did not have any comments on this proposal. 
 
OTHER 
 
18. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If 
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and 
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 11 of 14 
 
 
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that 
archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II 
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the results 
of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in consultation 
with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological materials are 
encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must cease within a 
33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be 
notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is 
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 12 through 14. 
 
19. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in 
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by 
the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require 
the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is 
addressed in Stipulation No. 15. 
 
20. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances. 
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements such as obtaining a 
use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this zoning district. Other formal 
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be 
required. 
 
Findings 
 
1. The proposed commercial development is appropriately located near the 
intersection of two arterial streets with various commercial uses and intensities. 
 
2. The proposed development will allow the redevelopment of vacant land, providing 
additional services to the community, while maintaining consistency with the 
surrounding character of the area. 
 
3. As stipulated, the proposed development will incorporate adequate standards that 
will help mitigate impacts to surrounding residential uses. 
 
Stipulations 
 
1. 
All building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as approved 
by the Planning and Development Department: 
 
a. 
All building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials 
and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability to provide a 
decorative and aesthetic treatment.

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 12 of 14 
 
 
b. 
All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and 
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in 
window size and location, and/or overhang canopies. 
 
c. 
No bay or loading doors shall be located on perimeter building elevations 
facing a perimeter property line. 
 
d. 
No windows shall be located on perimeter building elevations facing a 
residential property line. 
 
2. 
A minimum 25-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided adjacent to the 
south and west property lines, planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large 
evergreen trees, planted 20-feet on-center or in equivalent groupings to provide a 
minimum 30-foot solid vertical screen at maturity, as approved by the Planning 
and Development Department. 
 
3. 
All perimeter walls visible from the streets shall include material and textural 
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such 
as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and Development 
Department. 
 
4. 
All uncovered surface parking lot areas for employees and customers shall be 
landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper size large canopy drought tolerant shade 
trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 
25 percent shade at maturity, as approved by Planning and Development 
Department. 
 
5. 
All public sidewalks shall have a minimum 75 percent shade provided by shade 
trees at maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
6. 
Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, these shall be constructed of 
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments 
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
7. 
A minimum of two bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U 
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the 
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved 
by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
8. 
A minimum 5-foot wide detached sidewalk shall be provided along 19th Avenue 
and Southern Avenue. A minimum 10-foot wide landscape strip shall be located 
between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 13 of 14 
 
 
a. 
Minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy shade trees planted a minimum of 25 
feet on center or in equivalent groupings. 
 
b. 
Minimum 5-gallon shrubs providing 75 percent live cover at maturity. 
 
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and 
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a 
pedestrian environment. 
 
9. 
The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development 
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, 
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and 
Development Department.  All improvements shall comply with all ADA 
accessibility standards.  
 
10. 
The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and 
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to future 
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall 
be approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
11. 
The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed 
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis 
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by 
the Planning and Development Department. 
 
12. 
If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall 
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the 
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to 
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval. 
 
13. 
If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I 
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, 
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall 
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations. 
 
14. 
In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the 
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot 
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the 
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials. 
 
15. 
Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County 
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning 
application file for record.

Staff Report: Z-78-21-8 
February 25, 2022 
Page 14 of 14 
 
 
 
Writer 
Anthony Grande 
February 25, 2022 
 
Team Leader 
Joshua Bednarek 
 
Exhibits 
Sketch Map 
Aerial Map 
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped December 7, 2021 (1 page) 
Conceptual Building Elevations date stamped December 7, 2021 (2 pages) 
Community Correspondence (2 pages)

Z-145-86
Z-343-85
Z-49-19
*
*
C-2
R1-6
R-4
C-1
R1-6
PSC
R1-6
C-2 HGT/WVR
DNS/WVR
C-1 *
Z-166-04
19TH DR
HASAN DR
NANCY LN
20TH AVE
19TH AVE
20TH LN
20TH DR
20TH GLN
SOUTHERN AVE
LYNNE LN
BURGESS LN
BROADWAY RD
BASELINE RD
DOBBINS RD
27TH AVE
19TH AVE
7TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST
16TH ST
40TH ST
48TH ST
24TH ST
32ND ST
SOUTHERN AVE
I-10
SOUTH MOUNTAIN VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8
I
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-78-21
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
5.85 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
*   Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
R1-6 (Approved C-1)
C-2
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
31 ( 85)
85
*   UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
38 ( 102)
102
Shawn Valk / Platinum Construction
DATE:
12/30/2021
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 2-24
ZONING MAP
D-7
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: R1-6 (Approved C-1) ( 5.85 a.c.)
TO:
C-2 ( 5.85 a.c.)
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-78-21.mxd
Z-78-21
0.045
0
0.045
0.0225
Miles

Z-145-86
Z-343-85
Z-49-19
*
*
C-2
R1-6
R-4
C-1
R1-6
PSC
R1-6
C-2 HGT/WVR
DNS/WVR
C-1 *
Z-166-04
19TH DR
HASAN DR
NANCY LN
20TH AVE
19TH AVE
20TH LN
20TH DR
20TH GLN
SOUTHERN AVE
LYNNE LN
BURGESS LN
BROADWAY RD
BASELINE RD
DOBBINS RD
27TH AVE
19TH AVE
7TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST
16TH ST
40TH ST
48TH ST
24TH ST
32ND ST
SOUTHERN AVE
I-10
SOUTH MOUNTAIN VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8
I
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-78-21
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
5.85 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
*   Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
R1-6 (Approved C-1)
C-2
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
31 ( 85)
85
*   UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
38 ( 102)
102
Shawn Valk / Platinum Construction
DATE:
12/30/2021
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 2-24
ZONING MAP
D-7
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: R1-6 (Approved C-1) ( 5.85 a.c.)
TO:
C-2 ( 5.85 a.c.)
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-78-21.mxd
Z-78-21
0.045
0
0.045
0.0225
Miles


)


Z'› .
 
 
;<"1




* (

 
  





[


)


”•‘
)	
	

 


*
!# 


 	


"
	 
\
	

 	

"))


 

 
 


*%*



<
1
	

@

&	


	

 

8
›
i›


)
1



+1
#)

&	
˜<A!9
	
1
)
ƒ 
ƒ 
(1
	)1 
	
 



 

ƒ› 
 




+-&!)@-,0!-@  
@+-@@"@
 @2@
@@@
@@%@
+-&!)@+-*1!@ @.+.@



@


*!@
/@

 
 b› ’
(
1›
 
1

$*
1
1* 
)
1
<

@
*+
!/.@ @@@@.+.@
 @-1








/@





	
	
	

	



"*


)

 
))
 




)<
)<
 


	











 
1


#1


!<1





&010123Ž›
 
%11


=99c
Œ›) *
›

	%
1
1

&"&&
 
j› ‰
 	
7› J

 

	 
	&!&&&&&
& 	


&&
&01
<=B!@



< 





/*/'@./*-@-@
@@.@@@.@
@
@.@
++-*2	@-)/'@-@
@@@@@@
@
@.@@
0!'!)@'*/@*1-@
@.@@.@
@@
@29@@	@
*0/**-@./*-@*1-
@*1-@-1@ 

@.
@@
@@
/*/'@*1-@
@@
A99$9›
A9›l`|x 
&



	
	
 

“





, - › 
 


   	


 

]
)




(



 

& &
$& 

#
=9›l^zx
@A9

::›?9›
	
::›>9› 
	1
)
)1
::›?9

::›>9› –




::›?9›

::›>9› €
j
j
::›?9›

::›>9› —
*1
*
::›?9›
„
::›>9› „
$)
)1
::›?9›

::›>9› n

*
'1 1 ::›?9› 

	

::›>9› †
1
1
::›?9› 
		



1


::›?9
:: 9<>9
::›?9
::›9<>9

"






 ./› &'
:: 9<>9
	
	1
)
::›9<>9



:: 9<>9

j
:: 9<>9›

*
::›9<>9›
„
$)
::›9<>9›

::›9<>9›
†
1
::›9<>9› 	
1

:: 9<>9
::›9<>9
™KNf4
 
  &	%& 
*
1
 )
 


*




<


	
	


   




 
 
š#

-/





	


 &&&&
&&&&&
!&#&

			




	
 
  
<








 





81
)<

1

	



*

!*
I)

')





- !//@
-&@- !//.@!)@
@./@/ *(.@-*@
+ *)$2@-!3*)@ 
@
*)//@ )!'@.-@
+ *)@@@
2@ @@
(!'@ ;764?6=>8445<:
	
rupeTP›RTyOubr~bpmE›
lS…›<$x{ov‡›…^|Y›MKxSkSl|›Nh`kK{S›Nol{woggSQ›xShU›x|ovKXS›VKN^h^|‡›…`|Y›kg|^qhS›;$x|ov‡›Qv^‚S
q›lolNh`kK}S›NolzwoghSQ›xSgU›xzowKXS›WKN^h^{^Sx›KlQ›v‚›qKvf^lX
yTG
pOOrLmOˆ›~ˆrTF
yd~T›RL~LG›
qKwNSh›lkMSwH
Šol`lXH›
Xwoxx›x^{S›KwSKH
mp~TyG
xShU›x{ovKXS

A99CD%<AD
N!;
<<BCAD›x5U6›
A5<›KNwSx
wS%‹ol^lX›wSt^wSQ

 



)

	
	
=s$9 



#*

 <
!<
&1



	 	 	




i









  1
_
		

1
$1



,1

a
#@


1

 !)

1
!




 



	

&





+

/ %
<
/#110<#*< &&<
/"10< /0/6<
2"0</7#*<#0<*<
# * 02 / 5 ( * 1 < ,<
0$8"
< #3< "0<3<
-/,-/1:<,< /%<
/#110<#*	<*<
(  : < * , 2<
<
4.&#2<50<,/<
"0',0<7#1,51<
7/#11*<-/(#00#,*<
,<2</#11
<
 
	

01



01





@@
8	/	=252"8
	/
= *
@ 
9'"31&@+0338@

;
3
@83/0>5@%338@
0==
$(-(7' =%+//5
	






	
@@
<3@7 8 7(<@
<=
	/=#*
@	 

9($32%@)/338@
	
<3@830/?5@&338@
4@@
)-1-9,(&@)0338@

	






	



		

	

G
:;,;< 

)+;;1=;+><
   
* !G
1"06 )+G6 )&&$*1G
-'-0G
16GG+5(-51G6" )2G
	

G
G
E? 1@A+
G
8 8 8 8 G
9G
* !G
1"06 )+G6 )&&$*1G
-)-0G
16GG$371.G
	

* !G
1"06 )+G6 )&) )*1G
-&-0G
G7&&-6G

@@
:3@5 8 6(:@
@@
:	/=352!9
<=
%(#.
@
7"/.=&+//5
	
:3@83/0>5@%338@
4@	 4@
%(-(7' =%+//5
	





	
@@
:/	=452 :
=
!3@%($.@
@ 
7 /-=$,//5
= 1=
:/	=6/+,;2=//5
4@
@
*-1-9,(&@*0338@







	


		

* !G
21G
-'-0G
1'3G !07G
1.G
6 
G
 
	

BG C *
 
!G


F
0D   

-&-0G
&%G

	

 G  *; ;!G


4;1<    
	
-)-0G
1)3G !07G
1.G
G )&
&-%G
   
    
 


@@
=3@5 8 5(=@



* !G
-0-+-G12-+G
-'-0G
.G-G !07G
1.G
& !12-+G /5 )%G13%G

 )+ )1#G
* !G
-&-0G

 )+ )1#G
* !G
-(-0G
1.& )2G
15.0G& )2G
-.&G
1*--3"G
15.0& )2G
1.+G
@@
:@5 8 6(:

#"#
# 
	




	






 #

#!#
@@
:3@5 8 5(:@


#
	

#
\_ 	_
C3 _
C+0K$HF_19_ YZ_
C1*+HF_C#F#CR#_
H,.F_CS29*_2F_:_
1:FI CO6#:I_ <'_
F#CR1$_ 1I_ 1F_J+#_
?C<?#CJU_<(_C4_
C+2H#HF_2:_:=_
6 V_
9 < H _ #_
=W@52H$=_WF#=_<C_
0F5<F#_S0H+<OH_
SC2HJ#9_@#C72FF2<:_
<(_ H+#_C+0H#I_
 
	


 


_EG;BT_EG;B)"_MX[.8)]/_

	 	


_D%_A-P _L@__
E&_A.Q!_N>^_"_
 

  


  

  


2  
&
&
2
2
 &
!&
1
"&%&&


&
&
	




	

2 
"&
#&

 

&
&

	



	


"&
"&
2  
&
#&
1


	&
&
&


 
 &
 &
	


	&
&
	








		

 	
'-4
'4-'4
&
4
-,2'42#%&-4
($(,
4
-24
4'1%(1-42.4
 	
'-4
'4-'4
&4
-,2'42#%&-4
(#(,4
-24
4/3-)4
 		
&4
-,2'42%#&-4
(#(,4

	43##(24
." *$2
	
 	



&4
.-4
(#(,4
-#.4,34
-)4
24
 
&4
"2',4
(#(,4
#!4
 	

&4
/-4
(#(,4
-#.4,34
-)
4
4##(!4


!2 -2 #2 '2
(2
02
&2
#2 02 /2

2
)2
,2 #

&4
(,('(4-.('4
(#(,4
*4(4,34
." +%2

-)4
#-.('4 +1 "4-."4

'-4
&4
(#(,4

'-4
&4
(%(,4
-)#.4
-1),#/4
()#4
-&((.4
-1),#04
-)'4



	

!&*  **!*	"*%**!$" *%*
'*)*
#*

*  (*

 *


*
01 1
"	 	1
	"'$#11	./1
"$#1 "
#
"*
1
$#1"	+1#1	1
#$ ")
$1 1
#
"*1 $1 #1%
1
 " 
"%,11"		1
	"&
&#11	1
	-1   & 1 

1
(!	&1(#
1"1
##
1+&)&1
+"&%
1! 
"##1
1 &
1	"&
$1


	


	






	 

 
$&

From:
A N
To:
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject:
Letter Opposing Case No: Z-78-21 & Z-SP-7-21 19th Ave and Southern Avenue South and West of the SW Corner
Date:
Monday, January 10, 2022 2:48:59 PM
Dear city of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
and South Mountain Village Committe Members:
I am writing to express my strong opposition to Case Numbers: Z-SP-7-21 and Z-78-21, the
proposed rezoning South and West of the Southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Southern
Avenue.  While the local community may be unable to prevent development in itself will be
determental to the area, nearly all residents in Lindo neighborhood are completely opposed to
the addition of another Self Storage Facilities that will cause traffic and safety problems,
create even more problems with schools that are already over capacity, destroy local wildlife
habitat, no job opportunities for the community, lack of economic Development, increase in
more homeless, potential crime increase and potentially lower the property values of the
existing community.
Traffic and safety of pedestrians and school zones are major areas of concerns.  Traffic jams
on all four corners of 19th Avenue and Sourhern Avenue, NE and NW Corner; SE and SW
Corner already  existing traffic jams. The distance between 19th Avenue and Southern Avenue
between 19th Avenue and Baseline Road this distance already jams, declaration all lanes and
intersections is routinely blocked by traffic turning onto 19th Avenue a d Southern Avenue
North and South bound during rush hour.  The local neighborhood  traffic will
dispropertionately surge in the morning and evening rush hour, causing traffic issues during
critical times for the existing eight neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush
hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since walk to school in the mornings.  In
general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times
from  19th Avenue and Southern Avenue to 19th Avenue and Baseline Road and the cut
through Lindo neighborhood will also increase.  Schools in the area are already reported at
over capacity, and the council should not approve Self Storage Facility that created or
exacerbates a situation that will cause school  concurrency to fails for this proposal and/or
other approved plans.
Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat.  Any
planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local
wildhabitat.  This proposed planning area has several endangered species, which should be
investigated by the appropriate agency.
Property values are likely to go down in the area if Self Storage Facility are inconsistent with
thrr neighborhood developed in the area. I was disappointed that several notices were mailed.
There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect not many were
delivered into our neighborhood.
There is Storafe Facility in the process of building located on 16th Avenue and Southern
Avenue, NE Corner; there is 22 Storage Facility withing a 5 miles range;  approximately 130
Storage Facility's Units within South Mountain Village Community.  The Developers,
Investors and Owners of these facilities are multi millionaires; the average Storage facility
gross $400, 000.00 to $500,000.00 a month and none of this money is being put back into our
Community for Economic Growth. Who gaining? Not The Community!

I urge you disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings, and discussion with
neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who will not be able to attend virtual
meeting or write letters and or email.  Thank you, for your continued service and support of
our communities.
Best Regard,
Audria Nunley
Community Member