Extracted text (via pymupdf)
31772 characters
Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 1:00 PM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Maricopa County, Arizona (and the Boards of Directors of the Flood Control District, Library District, Stadium District, Improvement Districts, Housing Authority of Maricopa County, Housing Authority of Maricopa County and/or Board of Deposit) "The mission of Maricopa County is to provide regional leadership and fiscally responsible, necessary public services to its residents so they can enjoy living in healthy and safe communities” Board Members Jack Sellers, Chairman, District 1 Bill Gates, Vice Chairman, District 3 Steve Chucri, District 2 Clint Hickman, District 4 Steve Gallardo, District 5 County Manager Joy Rich Clerk of the Board Juanita Garza Meeting Location Supervisors' Conference Room 301 W Jefferson, 10th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85003 Chairman Sellers opened the meeting and asked the Clerk to call the roll. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in Special Session at 1:00 PM on Wednesday, January 13, 2021, in the Supervisors’ Conference Room, 301 W Jefferson, 10th Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Jack Sellers, Chairman, District 1; Bill Gates, Vice Chairman, District 3 (via webinar); Steve Chucri, Supervisor, District 2; (via webinar) Clint Hickman, Supervisor, District 4 (entered meeting late, via webinar); Steve Gallardo, Supervisor, District 5 (via webinar). Also present: Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board; Joy Rich, County Manager; Andrea Cummings, Legal Counsel (via webinar); Maria Ceaglske, Minutes Coordinator. PRESENTATION 1. PRESENTATION REGARDING THE FY 2022 BUDGET - MARICOPA COUNTY ASSESSOR Eddie Cook, Assessor Dawn Marie Buckland, Chief Deputy (C-06-21-379-X-00) Eddie Cook, County Assessor, introduced Dawn Marie Buckland, Chief Deputy Assessor. He noted the good working relationship with the Board of Supervisors and expected this relationship to continue in the coming years. Mr. Cook stated the 2022 focus would be on executing best-in-class practices to become more efficient. Mr. Cook reviewed the slide below, Organizing for Excellence. ~ Supervisor Hickman entered the meeting ~ He noted the office ended FY 2020 $1.8 million under budget. Mr. Cook noted this was the best year of return to taxpayers and to the general fund from the Assessor’s Office. He added the goal for FY 2022 is to be fully transparent and enhance the customer service experience. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 2 of 22 Mr. Cook briefly highlighted the Budget Themes for the Assessor’s Office listed in the slide below and turned the presentation over to Dawn Marie Buckland. Dawn Marie Buckland noted a few things to discuss from the Summary slide below. She said the focus was to maintain the enhancement of the customer experience and help them navigate the complexity of state laws. She explained what needed to be done in the short term and long term. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 3 of 22 Ms. Buckland reviewed the items on the Over Baseline Summary slide below and explained why these funds are needed. The goal was to be able to conduct business with the customer in an online capacity. Chairman Sellers asked if there was a percentage of customers expected to become digital in the next year or two. Ms. Buckland explained they do not have those metrics yet and putting those metrics together would be a very complex task. Supervisor Chucri asked for a more specific explanation on what the $380,000 is addressing for Project MARS. Supervisor Chucri said since there have been budget shortfalls in the past on this project, it is important the Board knows what the $380,000 is being used for. He also asked what “digital first” meant and how the $428,203 is being used. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 4 of 22 Ms. Buckland referred to the slide above, Project Mars, to answer Supervisor Chucri’s questions. She explained they have a contract that will achieve the mandatory deliverables by February 2022. She said most costs will be for cloud hosting and developing the system for the current year with a cost of $240,000. Ms. Buckland stated the total recurring costs per year will be about $600,000. She explained the vendor will be allocating different resources to help maintain the cloud services. Ms. Buckland introduced Marc Kramer, Chief of Innovation and Technology, to explain what the Assessor’s Office is currently doing with the sales force that will help provide the online interface for customers. Mr. Kramer noted the first project underway in the “digital first” initiative would bring the entire transaction into a digital format. Mr. Kramer reviewed the Digital First slide below noting validations and transitions in the process. He stated that this initiative will transform the paper processes to the digital arena and will improve the efficiency of Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 5 of 22 the operation for constituents. He said this is what customers are coming to expect in a modern transaction. Mr. Kramer said appeals is the first initiative and how this funding would be used. Supervisor Gates said he was very excited about this initiative. This is something he has championed for many years. He asked if the Assessor’s Office anticipated any savings down the road. Ms. Buckland said the office was anticipating this prospect and is working to quantify those possible savings. They are looking to automate processes and make the efforts less manual. She said the office would be able to reduce staff over the next three to five years. Chairman Sellers thanked Supervisor Gates for the question. He said even though there were upfront costs, substantial efficiencies would be gained over the upcoming years. Mr. Cook noted this would minimize errors because data would go directly into a database. Ms. Buckland said they will have many opportunities to improve day to day interactions. She also noted the Assessor’s Office did not want to lose the personal touch in the transactions. Mr. Cook noted a couple of initiatives he wished to highlight that are important for the County and property owners. He said his team discovered numerous stakeholders that claimed how confusing Proposition 117, implemented in 2015, was to the public. Mr. Cook said he wanted to provide the ability for the public to understand this impact to their property. This affects how their property is appraised following discovered improvements. He wanted to provide to the public the ability to calculate how much an improvement will impact to their property taxes. He also advocated for common technologies for Maricopa County offices that provide a common customer database which all departments have access to. Mr. Cook urged the Board, as policy makers, to consider looking at these kinds of technologies. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 6 of 22 Ms. Buckland stated part of Digital First was to embrace teleworking. She said the pandemic caused teleworking to be a triage action and she thanked all the departments that helped make this happen. She stated a reliable and sustainable solution was needed. She reviewed what the over baseline items would be and how they would be used. Ms. Buckland reviewed the Succession Planning slide below. She noted there are many people in the Assessor’s office with 20 or more years of service with the County. Ms. Buckland said this line of work is technical and complex and the department is concentrating on cross training to maintain technical training and skills in addition to focusing on leadership development, and continuity. Ms. Buckland mentioned the Computer Aided Mass Appraisal (CAMA) system and the need to understand this system at a detailed level. She noted there are additional systems used that require skills that take years to develop. The office would like to create rotations of staff in the CAMA group. Ms. Buckland reviewed the slide below and said The Assessor’s office is creating an environment of innovation in the best possible way. The position, Innovation Strategist, is being developed to specifically look at processes, interfaces, and ensuring that the best possible processes are in place. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 7 of 22 Supervisor Hickman made a comment about transition and the Board’s concern with “brain drain” due to potential retirements. He said he remembered cross training for new technology that had been previously budgeted for by the former Assessor. Supervisor Hickman asked if those initiatives just ended. Ms. Buckland responded that those initiatives did not end. She said this is a continuation of some of those initiatives. They are refocusing some of that work and she provided the examples of what is being done with existing resources. Mr. Cook stated he was aware of the presentation given by the previous Assessor. He believed there was a reorganization of teams and they were organizing the workflow. The new leadership team is evaluating those actions and there are places where improvements can be made. Ms. Buckland continued with the following slide informing the Board on Project MARS business analyses and dashboards. She noted the department has recently hired two report writers that has had a huge impact on the department’s ability to analyze the effectiveness of the system. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 8 of 22 Ms. Buckland reviewed the slide below and highlighted the bullet points concerning total cost, budget reduction, and the reallocation of funding. Ms. Buckland gave a brief review of the slides shown below. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 9 of 22 Ms. Buckland pointed out one of the items on the slide below is the additional increases related to the additional CAMA positions that the Assessor’s office was able to fund from the existing budget but needed additional funds for licensing Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 10 of 22 Supervisor Chucri asked why $40,000 was needed for DocuSign. Mr. Kramer explained DocuSign would be integrated into the sales force application, increasing the number of transactions and requiring additional licensing. Mr. Cook thanked the Board for allowing the Assessor’s office to share part of their One Team culture initiatives. He and his team were grateful to collaborate with the Board’s team and leadership. Chairman Sellers thanked Mr. Cook for the update on his department. 2. PRESENTATION REGARDING THE FY 2022 BUDGET - MARICOPA COUNTY COUNTY ATTORNEY Allister Adel, County Attorney Ken Vick, Chief Deputy Candice Copple, Chief of Staff (C-06-21-378-X-00) Chairman Sellers spoke on behalf of the Board in expressing their pleasure to have Allister Adele, County Attorney, join them today. Ms. Adele congratulated Chairman Sellers for his leadership as Chairman of Board of Supervisors. She stated she is looking forward to the end of the pandemic and thanked the Board for their support while she was out on leave. She thanked her staff, specifically Candice Copple and Ken Vick, for their hard work while she has been out. Candice Copple, Chief of Staff, congratulated Chairman Sellers and stated it was good to see everyone. She expressed her appreciation for Reid Spaulding, Assistant County Manager, and his contributions to getting 225 Madison ready for occupation by the County Attorney Offices. Ms. Copple reviewed the slide below on the FY 2021 budget review. She acknowledged the Board’s request that the budget be reduced by 2% which amounted a reduction of $2,073,385 for the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (MCAO). Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 11 of 22 MCAO FY21 Budget Review 2% MCAO Budget Reduction = $2,073,385 •Increased Vacancy Savings by 1.5% •Deleted 6 FTE positions •Reduced Employee Educational Travel Ms. Copple reviewed the slide below and noted in June they were asked to provide a proposed budget reduction of 3% and 5%. She explained the bullet points and how they would reduce the budget as requested. Ms. Copple noted MCAO is currently spending less than what was budgeted for FY 2021. She noted some discrepancies are due to the halt of the criminal justice system for several weeks. She stated MCAO does expect spending to pick back up in FY 2022 and the timing for this will be driven by the courts’ schedule. MCAO FY21 Budget Review Proposed 3% and 5% Budget Reductions •Held 55 positions empty •Eliminated use of temporary employees •Reduced overtime, supplies and services Ms. Copple noted MCAO will not be asking for a budget increase for FY 2022. She reviewed the slide below stating that MCAO’s baseline budget for FY 2022 is $102,149,435. Ms. Copple provided some examples of how MCAO will use funds within their current budget to pay for any additional full-time employees. She noted it is very important to maintain competitive salaries to retain an experienced workforce. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 12 of 22 MCAO FY22 Budget Overview •Baseline For FY22 is $102,149,435 •No additional requests are being made for FY22 •Continue to focus on operational efficiencies •Support for County-wide Pay for Performance Ken Vick, Chief Deputy County Attorney, said looking at the budget moving forward, he wanted to make the Board aware of a few things that will have budgetary impacts. He reviewed the Pandemic Criminal Trends from the slide below highlighting each bullet point. He noted that mitigation efforts during the pandemic have helped keep statistics from climbing too high. He stated the staff could handle the trend, but the Board should be aware that if the trend continues through the pandemic more staff will be needed. Pandemic Criminal Trends • New domestic violence homicides have nearlydoubled from the same time period last year • Family violence offenses likely underreported Mr. Vick reviewed the Other Budget Considerations slide below. He explained MCAO is statutorily obligated to assist with adoptions for uncontested in-house adoptions. The Board added 2.5 full-time employees which provided a $750,000 savings by bringing the adoptions back in-house. He briefly reviewed RICO legislative issues and said he expected similar action at the legislature this year. Mr. Vick noted the Board’s support of diversion programs at MCAO. He stated it allows the department to remove barriers and would permit offenders to move out of traditional prosecution and into these programs. He said MCAO has several programs and he gave a brief descriptions of Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 13 of 22 them. The goal is to reduce recidivism through these the programs and the statistics he provided indicate the programs are working. The national recidivism rates are at 70%; in Maricopa County it is 20%. Mr. Vick stated the department is looking at the state legislature for additional funding to assist with these programs. Mr. Vick noted the Criminal Justice Enhancement Fund (CJEF) revenue is declining. These funds are used for various full-time employees and noted it is funded with civil and criminal fines. These fines are declining, and he did not think we will see the funds as we did 5-6 years ago. Mr. Vick said this is something the Board needs to be aware of because it may impact future budgets. Other Budget Considerations • Uncontested In-House Adoptions • Pending RICO Legislation • Diversion • Declining CJEF Revenue Ms. Copple thanked the Board for their consideration. Supervisor Chucri thanked the MCAO team and for being resourceful with their budget. He said he is concerned with the RICO fund and as Mr. Vick said, the County may have to offset some of these costs. Supervisor Chucri commended MCAO for their ability to work within their budgetary guidelines. 3. PRESENTATION REGARDING THE FY 2022 BUDGET - MARICOPA COUNTY MANAGER Joy Rich, County Manager Reid Spaulding, Deputy County Manager Valerie Beckett, Assistant County Manager Lee Ann Bohn, Assistant County Manager (C-06-21-377-X-00) Joy Rich, County Manager, informed the Board she was going to share this responsibility with the three Assistant County Managers, Valerie Beckett, Reid Spaulding, and Lee Ann Bohn. She stated the County Manager’s Office has a significant request for the FY 2022 budget. She said there are significant issues, particularly in technology and public defense, that will need to be brought before the Board. Ms. Rich reviewed the following slide noting they are asking for $28 million with $14 million in Operating and almost $14 million in Non-Recurring. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 14 of 22 Summary of Requests Operating $ 14,284,928 General Fund $ 14,161,694 Detention Fund $ 123,234 Non-Recurring $ 13,919,278 General Fund $ 13,043,512 Detention Fund $ 875,766 TOTAL j $ 28,204,206 Ms. Rich stated Valerie Beckett would be presenting next. Ms. Beckett stated she would be reporting on three departments within her purview and reviewed them as seen on the slide below. She explained in detail the need for the increases for Animal Care and Control, the Public Fiduciary Department, and the Public Defense Services Department. Assistant County Manager 940 Direct Reports Animal Care and Control $ 2,783,815 General Fund Operating $ 2,783,815 $1,457,789 – Subsidy for Risk Management increase $1,326,026 – Operations Subsidy for insufficient revenue Public Fiduciary $ 450,000 General Fund Operating $ 150,000 Case Management System General Fund Non-Recurring $ 300,000 Case Management System implementation Public Defense Services $ 3,447,460 General Fund Operating $ 347,460 JustWare Replacement General Fund Non-Recurring $ 3,100,000 $1,600,000 – JustWare Replacement $1,500,000 – Additional Capital PCR Case Cost REQUEST TOTAL $ 6,681,275 Supervisor Hickman thanked Ms. Rich for breaking down the figures and said it is a rarity that the Board gets to see this amount of detail. He said it allows the Supervisors to see some of these costs and make decisions accordingly. He asked about the Animal Care and Control operations subsidy of $1.3 million. He said he knows everyone is looking for different ways to bring in more revenue and asked if a new fee model with the participating communities would help meet this goal. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 15 of 22 Ms. Beckett said they are looking at changing the IGA fee model to see if the department can be self-funded. This is going to require a more complex conversation as to how the Board wants to proceed with new policies with regards to Animal Care and Control. She said under the new leadership there has been heavy engagement with the Innovation Studio to streamline the processes, find efficiencies, and use the right people for the right services. Ms. Rich reviewed the slide below and provided a detailed explanation for the budget requests. She noted the increased activity in the Social Media arena and the request from Communications to have dedicated staff to manage that activity. Chairman Sellers noted the focus on social media has become a critical area of communication. Ms. Rich reviewed the Enterprise Technology items and expanded on the numbers and reasons for the ask. County Manager Direct Reports County Manager’s Office $ 80,000 General Fund Operating $ 80,000 Add 1 FTE Social Media Communications Officer ICJIS $ 123,234 Detention Fund Operating $ 123,234 Hardware and software maintenance and support Enterprise Technology $ 8,689,303 General Fund Operating $ 3,170,025 $2,480,185 - Major maintenance and operations cloud s computing platform $506,200 - Security Tools $130,000 - Single Sign-On expansion $112,767 – Increased network fiber costs $89,279 - Data Center Lease Increase $46,062 – Other/Round up $-194,468 – Operational savings offset General Fund Non-Recurring $ 4,793,512 $1,000,000 - Digital Initiatives/OnBase Workflow $500,000 – Information Security $3,293,512 - Desktop/Laptop Replacement Detention Fund Non-Recurring $ 725,766 Desktop/Laptop Replacement REQUEST TOTAL$8,892,537 Chairman Sellers questioned why different departments are spending money on firewalls and cyber security, and asked why this is not centralized. Ed Winfield, Enterprise Technology Chief Information Officer, responded and said that some of the elected offices have their own sub-networks that require their own firewalls. He said they are working to find enterprise capability for this, but until that point is reached, the firewalls are needed because they are the first line of defense and must be modernized. Chairman Sellers stated he is happy this is being looked at moving forward. Ms. Rich continued with her presentation of the above slide. Mr. Winfield expanded further on the use of DocuSign and the increase in use of this tool throughout the County departments. He said ways to route purchase orders and documents through the Procurement Department was an example. Mr. Winfield explained the value of OnBase, stating it offers more functionality and depth in terms of automating processes. Supervisor Gates thanked Ms. Rich for the commitment made to technology. He asked if it was possible to see how much of this technology can be covered by CARES Act funding. He also asked what the ratio was for replacing desktops for laptops. Mr. Winfield stated there are some locations where the desktops are required, such as the Treasurer’s front counter, but most requests are for laptops to replace desktops. Ms. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 16 of 22 Rich said she would find out if the refresh in technology is covered by CARES Act funding. Supervisor Hickman asked if an assessment was done for equipment needs and what equipment is available. He said it had been reported to him there appeared to be many desktops positioned and no one associated with them. Mr. Winfield explained a detailed assessment is made when there are newly elected officials to determine their needs. He stated he would investigate the circumstances described by Supervisor Hickman. Deputy County Manager Direct Reports Emergency Management $ 150,000 General Fund Operating $ 150,000 Security services contract annual increase Equipment Services $ 350,000 General Fund Non-Recurring $ 200,000 Total loss vehicle replacement Detention Fund Non-Recurring $ 150,000 $50,000 – Net of carryforward funding for 2 buses in FY22 $100,000 - Total loss vehicle replacement ($100K) REQUEST TOTAL$ 500,000 Mr. Spaulding reviewed the above slide providing information for each request. He started with emergency management requests and noted the Security Services contract allowed for a 12% increase annually for Security Services and it was negotiated down to a 9% increase over a two-year period. He explained the cost to the County would exceed the $150,000 request if the County chose not to keep this contract. Mr. Spaulding continued the presentation with a review of the Equipment Services requests. He explained the increases are for total loss vehicle replacement and new equipment purchases, specifically for buses used for inmate transport. Ms. Bohn reviewed the slide below depicting the requests being made for Human Services and Public Health. She began with Human Services and noted there is an anticipated gap in federal grants. Ms. Bohn also explained the need for the FTEs being requested. Ms. Bohn continued with requests being made for the Public Health Department as noted on the slide. She explained the City of Glendale has offered to donate a building to Public Health to support the rise in STDs across the valley. Ms. Bohn reviewed the request for the Indigent Disposition Program and stated the program has struggled to meet demand changes brought about by COVID. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 17 of 22 Supervisor Gates asked if some of the requests being made for Public Health were going to be needed moving forward or would some no longer be needed post-COVID. Ms., Bohn explained how much had already been cut from the original request made by Public Health. She said these requests go toward supporting the department’s base operations and this will help if another rapid response outbreak occurs. Supervisor Gates stated he supported Public Health and appreciated Public Health being proactive to be better prepared for future events. Supervisor Gallardo, Chairman Sellers, and Supervisor Chucri agreed with Supervisor Gates’s comments. Ms. Bohn moved on to review the requests being made by the Medical Examiner’s Office detailed on the slide below. She reviewed the need for the additional FTEs being requested. She noted CARES funding has been used for some of the current filled positions. Supervisor Chucri asked if the retention incentives implemented has shown any success. Ms. Bohn responded it has been a good incentive for retention. Ms. Bohn continued to review in detail the variety of lower-level positions needing to be filled on the slide below. She said the lower level positions would allow the highly trained medical personnel to focus on the critical areas of the Medical Examiner’s office. Finally, Ms. Bohn explained the radiology equipment hardware warranty expires in March and the vendor will not provide a warranty after that date. She said the software for this equipment is dated and OET has security concerns about this. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 18 of 22 Assistant County Manager 950 Direct Reports (Cont.) Medical Examiner $ 1,620,548 General Fund Operating $ 970,548 $225,000 - Locum Tenens Physician Program $290,592 – Add 2 FTE Physician Assistant $95,864 – Add 1 FTE Medicolegal Death Investigator s s Supervisor $112,630 – Add 3 FTE Medicolegal Death Investigator s s Intern $176,462 – add 1 FTE Forensic Photographer & 1.5 FTE s d Forensic Technicians $70,000 – Neuropathy Consults General Fund Non-Recurring $ 650,000 Radiology equipment replacement REQUEST TOTAL$ 5,683,579 Ms. Bohn reviewed the final slide below concerning County initiatives. She explained the reasons for these initiatives and the corresponding costs. She said there has been a big increase in the Mental Health Courts and expects that trend to continue. The slide reflects the increase in positions to manage the cases. Supervisor Gates said he is pleased to see these initiatives and asked how staffing would be handled. Ms. Bohn responded this is in the Probate Mental Health area and it would require a new commissioner position. Ms. Bohn stated, in response to the Chairman’s recent speech regarding the focus on homelessness, she and Bruce Liggett, Human Services Director, are making a request for an investment in regional homelessness. She also noted how the funds could be utilized in this area in partnership with other agencies. Chairman Sellers said it is important to have community partners working together on this issue. He said this was encouraging. Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 19 of 22 County Initiatives Mental Health Court Calendar Expansion $ 1,446,815 General Fund Operating $ 1,446,815 $425,252 – Add 4 FTE Superior Court $ 57,820 – Add 1 FTE Clerk of Court $553,182 – Add 3.2 FTE County Attorney $355,244 – Add 3 FTE Public Defense $ 55,317 – Add 1 FTE Public Fiduciary Regional Homeless Investment $ 5,000,000 General Fund Operating $ 1,000,000 General Fund Non-Recurring $ 4,000,000 REQUEST TOTAL$6,446,815 Ms. Rich concluded the presentation and explained these requests are not brought forward lightly and she looks forward to further refinement to the proposals. ACTION 4. MARICOPA COUNTY FY 2022 BUDGET GUIDELINES AND PRIORITIES Approve the "Maricopa County FY 2022 Budget Guidelines and Priorities." (C-49-20- 015-X-00) Cindy Goelz, Budget Director, requested approval of guidelines and priorities to be used in the development of the FY 2022 budget. She said they have used an economists’ recession scenario in evaluating revenues and the development of a compensation plan moving forward. Individuals must submit a budget under baseline unless they have made a presentation before the Board of Supervisors. Motion to approve by Supervisor Bill Gates, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman Ayes: Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Steve Chucri, Bill Gates, Steve Gallardo MEETING ADJOURNED There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. _____________________________ Jack Sellers, Chairman of the Board ATTEST: ___________________________ Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 20 of 22 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT The Board of Directors of Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in Special Session at 1:00 PM on Wednesday, January 13, 2021, in the Supervisors’ Conference Room, 301 W Jefferson, 10th Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Jack Sellers, Chairman, District 1; Bill Gates, Vice Chairman, District 3 (via webinar); Steve Chucri, Supervisor, District 2; (via webinar) Clint Hickman, Supervisor, District 4 (via webinar); Steve Gallardo, Supervisor, District 5 (via webinar). Also present: Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board; Joy Rich, County Manager; Andrea Cummings, Legal Counsel (via webinar); Maria Ceaglske, Minutes Coordinator. 5. MARICOPA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FY 2022 BUDGET GUIDELINES AND PRIORITIES Approve the "Maricopa County Flood Control District FY 2022 Budget Guidelines and Priorities." (C-49-21-014-X-00) Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 21 of 22 Motion to approve by Director Bill Gates, seconded by Director Steve Gallardo Ayes: Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Steve Chucri, Bill Gates, Steve Gallardo MEETING ADJOURNED There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. _____________________________ Jack Sellers, Chairman of the Board ATTEST: ___________________________ Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 13, 2021 Page 22 of 22 LIBRARY DISTRICT The Board of Directors of Library District of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in Special Session at 1:00 PM on Wednesday, January 13, 2021, in the Supervisors’ Conference Room, 301 W Jefferson, 10th Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Jack Sellers, Chairman, District 1; Bill Gates, Vice Chairman, District 3 (via webinar); Steve Chucri, Supervisor, District 2; (via webinar) Clint Hickman, Supervisor, District 4 (via webinar); Steve Gallardo, Supervisor, District 5 (via webinar). Also present: Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board; Joy Rich, County Manager; Andrea Cummings, Legal Counsel (via webinar); Maria Ceaglske, Minutes Coordinator. 6. MARICOPA COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT FY 2022 BUDGET GUIDELINES AND PRIORITIES Approve the "Maricopa County Library District FY 2022 Budget Guidelines and Priorities." (C-49-21-013-X-00) Motion to approve by Director Bill Gates, seconded by Director Steve Gallardo Ayes: Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Steve Chucri, Bill Gates, Steve Gallardo MEETING ADJOURNED There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. _____________________________ Jack Sellers, Chairman of the Board ATTEST: ___________________________ Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board