Attachment B - PHO Summary - PHO-1-21--Z-141-97-6.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2021-06-02)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 15741 characters
REPORT OF PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION 
Adam Stranieri, Planner III, Hearing Officer  
Danielle Jordan, Planner I, Assisting  
April 21, 2021 
ITEM NO: 3 
DISTRICT 6 
SUBJECT: 
Application #: 
PHO-1-21--Z-141-97-6 
Location: 
Approximately 400 feet southeast of the intersection of 50th 
Street and Thistle Landing Drive 
Existing Zoning: 
CP/GCP 
Acreage:  
30.64 
Request: 
1) Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding general
conformance to the site plan dated November 17, 1997.
2) Modification of Stipulation 4 regarding access points onto
50th Street.
3) Deletion of Stipulation 5 regarding right-of-way for a box
culvert crossing 50th Street.
4) Deletion of Stipulation 6 regarding a drainage channel
and related construction details and right-of-way.
5) Deletion of Stipulation 7 regarding retention for the 100-
year 2-hour rainfall event in a single common retention
basin.
6) Technical correction to Stipulation 2
Applicant: 
Jason Morris, Withey Morris PLC 
Owner: 
Kyrene Elementary School District 
Representative: 
Jason Morris, Withey Morris PLC 
ACTIONS 
Planning Hearing Officer Recommendation: The Planning Hearing took the case 
under advisement.  On May 11, 2021, the Planning Hearing Officer took the 
case out from under advisement and recommended approval with modifications 
and additional stipulations. 
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: The Ahwatukee Foothills 
Village Planning Committee opted not to hear this request. 
DISCUSSION 
Benjamin Tate, the representative, gave an overview of the request. He stated 
that the site is just over 28 acres and located southeast of the intersection of 50th 
Street and Thistle Landing Drive. He stated that the site was acquired by the 
Attachment B

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of April 21, 2021 
Application PHO-1-21--Z-141-97-6 
Page 2 
 
Kyrene School District in 1995 for a school site, but they ultimately chose a 
different site and it was rezoned to from RE-43 to CP/GCP in 1998. The original 
rezoning request was for a larger area and the parcel to the north is already 
developed. He stated that they are requesting a new site plan for general 
conformance for light industrial uses per Stipulation 1, modification of Stipulation 
4 to increase the number of access points allowed on the site from two to four, 
deletion of Stipulation 5 regarding the box culvert due to the stipulation being 
met, deletion of Stipulation 6 regarding a drainage channel, and deletion of 
Stipulation 7 regarding retention. He stated that the proposed use is 3 light 
industrial buildings with a total of 510,000 square feet with parking and loading 
bays between each building. He stated that the loading bays will be screened 
from the adjacent roadways to reduce their visual impact and due to its location 
along the I-10 frontage road and vehicular access is only available along 50th 
Street. The property will also include detached sidewalks along 50th Street and 
shade trees along the sidewalks. 
Adam Stranieri stated that the site plan is consistent with the scale and intensity 
with commerce park developments in the surrounding area and the style and size 
is expected with this type of use. He stated that the screening is also consistent 
with other stipulations that were not included in the request and will be retained.  
Mr. Stranieri moved on to Stipulation 4 regarding the number of driveways. He 
stated that the Street Transportation Department noted that there was already a 
driveway access point near the southwest corner of the site which provides 
access to an existing drainage channel to the south. He stated that due to this 
they are willing to support increasing the number of driveways from two to three 
but not to four.  He noted concerns regarding the capacity to align additional 
driveways with other driveways along 50th Street.  He stated that the Street 
Transportation Department also requested an additional stipulation requiring the 
dedication of a 20-foot drainage easement adjacent to the existing 30-foot 
drainage easement to the south of the property. He stated that the existing 
driveway was intended to provide access to the existing 30-foot drainage 
easement. The requirement for the new 20-foot drainage easement is intended to 
provide continued access to the existing drainage easement once the site is 
developed. Mr. Tate noted that if the intent behind the easement is strictly for 
access then it should not restrict them from providing parking within that 
easement.  He stated that he would rather the language be modified to reflect an 
access easement rather than a drainage easement. Mr. Stranieri asked what the 
concern was with the wording of drainage easement. Mr. Tate explained that he 
would want to ensure that the developer could provide landscaping and parking 
within the easement area as depicted on the plan and stated that they would be 
amenable to the term public easement.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of April 21, 2021 
Application PHO-1-21--Z-141-97-6 
Page 3 
 
Mr. Stranieri moved on to Stipulation 5 and stated that the box culvert was 
constructed at the time when the property to the north was developed and can be 
deleted. He stated that Stipulation 6 regarding a drainage channel and related 
construction details and right-of-way reflected drainage concerns that impact 
outfall from the parcel to the north through the subject site.  He stated that these 
concerns are still present today and the stipulation needs to be retained. He 
stated that Stipulation 7 regarding retention for the 100-year 2-hour rainfall event 
in a single common retention basin should remain.  He noted that the subject 
property is considerably larger than the parcel to the north and that that parcel 
had met the stipulation with an approved grading and drainage plan.  He noted 
that the applicant’s narrative expressed concern regarding meeting the 
stipulation for only a portion of the site and stated that staff felt the condition was 
still appropriate and achievable given the existing development to the north. 
Mr. Stranieri went back to Stipulation 4 and stated that he did not know whether 
the Street Transportation Department would be amenable to changing the 
easement type in the additional stipulation or whether landscaping and parking 
would be permitted within the proposed easement type. He recommended to 
take the case under advisement to investigate the appropriate easement type to 
achieve the intent of the Street Transportation Department staff taking into 
consideration the applicant’s concerns regarding the capacity to develop within 
the easement.  He asked if Mr. Tate had any questions regarding his position on 
the remainder of the stipulations and if he had concerns regarding taking the 
case under advisement. Mr. Tate stated that he did not have any further 
questions. Mr. Stranieri took the case under advisement.  
 
FINDINGS 
 
1) The original stipulated site plan was conceptual in nature and depicted an 
office complex arranged in a square pattern centered around a circular 
open space with a rotary driveway configuration.  The offices were split 
into four buildings consisting of approximately 73,250 square feet each 
and approximately 293,000 square feet in total.  Large parking areas were 
depicted north and south of the office buildings.  This proposal failed to 
develop, and the property remains vacant.  The proposed site plan depicts 
three shell warehouse buildings lying in an east-west pattern across the 
site.  Total building square footage is approximately 510,831 square feet 
with the individual buildings at approximately 140,941, 159,220, and 
210,670 square feet respectively.  Loading areas are depicted in 
screened, gated areas between the buildings.  The proposal is consistent 
in scale and intensity with other large-scale office and warehouse 
developments in the surrounding area, particularly along 50th Street to the 
north and west.  General conformance to the conceptual site plan is

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of April 21, 2021 
Application PHO-1-21--Z-141-97-6 
Page 4 
 
recommended with a minor modification to the applicant’s request to 
incorporate more current standard language. 
 
2) Stipulation 4 currently limits the total number of access points along 50th 
Street to a maximum of two.  The Street Transportation Department noted 
that a special circumstance exists on the site in that a driveway access 
point is already present near the southwest corner of the site to provide 
access to an existing drainage channel. Therefore, the Street 
Transportation Department is amenable to accept a third driveway to be 
located at the existing drive location.  This recommendation is consistent 
with guidelines in the Street Transportation Planning and Design Manual 
which states that driveways should align with those on the opposing side 
of the street to avoid conflicting turn movements, provide adequate 
queuing and storage between each driveway, and be consolidated 
whenever possible.  Therefore, the applicant’s request is recommended to 
be approved with a modification to permit a maximum of three, rather than 
the proposed four, access points. 
 
3) The Street Transportation Department also noted that the existing third 
driveway will be utilized for site access and drainage channel access.  
Therefore, an additional stipulation is recommended to require a 20-foot 
wide public drainage easement to be dedicated abutting the existing 30-
foot-wide drainage easement.   This 20-foot public drainage easement is 
intended to provide access to the existing drainage channel in accordance 
with the third driveway.  The case was taken under advisement in order to 
allow additional research on the applicant’s concerns regarding potential 
construction in this area.  Street Transportation Department staff 
subsequently confirmed their initial recommendation was appropriate and 
this additional stipulation is recommended for inclusion. 
 
4) The applicant’s request for deletion of Stipulation 5 is recommended for 
approval.  The box culvert in the stipulation was constructed at the time 
that the adjacent property to the north was developed and is present 
today.  This property is within the boundaries of the original rezoning case 
but is not included in the subject property of this request. 
 
5) The applicant’s request for deletion of Stipulation 6 regarding a drainage 
channel is recommended to be denied.  In the original rezoning case, it 
was noted that the site is affected by both on and off-site drainage issues 
with inadequate outfall south of Pecos Road and channels to reach Pecos 
Road.  The intent of the stipulation was to help mitigate impacts by 
providing appropriate easements and channels and attenuate flows by 
using common retention areas and routing off-site flows through them.  
These concerns remain today.   Additionally, Planning and Development 
staff noted that the ultimate site outfall from the north parcel is through this 
site to a channel adjacent to the south property line.   The applicant

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of April 21, 2021 
Application PHO-1-21--Z-141-97-6 
Page 5 
 
argued that this stipulation has been satisfied.  These drainage issues will 
continue to be reviewed by staff through the plan review process to 
determine whether additional work is required to satisfy this condition. 
 
6) The applicant’s request for deletion of Stipulation 7 regarding a 
requirement for the developer to provide retention for the 100-year 2-hour 
rain fall event is recommended to be denied.  The applicant argued that at 
the time of the original rezoning approval, the stipulation was intended to 
apply to the entire 41.55 gross acre site.  They stated that this condition is 
not feasible on the approximately 30.64 gross acres that constitutes the 
subject property of the current request, without the inclusion of the parcel 
adjacent to the north.  However, the approximately 10.91 gross acre site 
adjacent to the north fulfilled this stipulation during development with the 
approved grading and drainage plan for the Mountain Vista Commercial 
Center.  The stipulation is feasible to be satisfied for the subject property 
of this request and should be retained. 
 
DECISION: The Planning Hearing took the case under advisement.  On May 10, 
2021, the Planning Hearing Officer took the case out from under advisement and 
recommended approval with modifications and additional stipulations. 
 
STIPULATIONS 
 
1. 
That THE development SHALL be in general conformance to WITH the 
site plan dated DATE STAMPED MARCH 5, 2021 November 17, 1997, AS 
MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY 
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 
 
 
2. 
That The entire site SHALL be developed with a unified architectural 
theme. The theme should assure the building colors, elevations, exterior 
materials, landscaping, lighting and signage convey a sense of continuity 
throughout the development, as approved by the PLANNING AND 
Development Services Department. 
 
 
3. 
That All loading docks shall be screened from view. 
 
 
4. 
That A maximum of two THREE access points SHALL be permitted onto 
50th Street as approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services 
Department. 
 
 
5. 
That the developer provide right-of-way as determined by Development 
Services Department for a box culvert crossing 50th Street at the 
southwest corner of the site, or in an alternate location as approved by the 
Development Services Department.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of April 21, 2021 
Application PHO-1-21--Z-141-97-6 
Page 6 
 
5. 
6. 
That The developer shall provide, at a minimum, right-of-way for a 
drainage channel along a portion of the east property boundary. This 
channel shall connect to the channel proposed within the Interstate 10 
right-of-way and the existing channel located south of the existing site. The 
location of this channel shall be consistent with drainage studies approved 
or accepted by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
That if required by the PLANNING AND Development Services 
Department, the applicant shall construct the channel only for that portion 
which is located outside of the ADOT right-of-way. 
 
 
6. 
THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE A 20-FOOT-WIDE PUBLIC 
DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE, 
ABUTTING THE EXISTING 30-FOOT-WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, 
AND ALIGNED WITH THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN ACCESS POINT TO 
50TH STREET, AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND 
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 
 
 
7. 
That The developer SHALL provide retention for the 100-year 2-hour 
rainfall event in a single common retention basin, or in an alternate 
configuration as approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services 
Department, and to be maintained by a property owner’s association. 
 
 
8. 
That The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the 
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, 
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved 
by the City. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility 
standards. 
 
 
9. 
That The developer shall provide the City with a revised Traffic Impact 
Study. Additional right-of-way dedications may be required based upon the 
approved revised Traffic Impact Study. 
 
 
10. 
PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER 
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS IN A 
FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.  THE WAIVER 
SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S 
OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE 
REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.