Attachment C - VPC Summary - Z-72-22-8.pdf
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
34720 characters
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3
rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting
January 9, 2023
Request From
S-1 (Approved R1-6 PCD), and S-1 (Approved R-2 PCD)
Request To
PUD
Proposed Use
Industrial, Commerce Park, and Multifamily Residential
Location
Southeast corner of 59th Avenue and Elliot Road
VPC DISCUSSION:
Item No. 8 (Z-75-22-8), Item No. 9 (GPA-LV-4-22-8), Item No. 10 (Z-72-22-8), Item No.
11 (GPA-LV-5-22-7), and Item No. 12 (Z-73-22-7) were heard together.
Four members of the public registered to speak on these item. Two of the members
donated their time.
APPLICANT PRESENTATION:
Jason Morris, representing the applicant with Withey Morris PLC, introduced himself
and the three proposed projects by IDM. Mr. Morris stated that he will provide a
combined presentation for agenda items 8 though 12. Mr. Morris provided an overview
of IDM, describing the Columbia Tech Center, which is owned by IDM. Mr. Morris then
introduced Item No. 8 (Z-75-22-8), by the name of Curato, describing the site location,
changes made to the site plan and elevations, and the proposed site plan plus
elevations. Mr. Morris stated that 171 dwelling units are now proposed, with the primary
access along Elliot Road. Mr. Morris described the proposed building elevations,
renderings, site amenities, and housing plus retail trends in the area. Mr. Morris
concluded by listing various project benefits. Mr. Morris then introduced Item Nos. 9
(GPA-LV-4-22-8) and 10 (Z-72-22-8), by the name of Acero Laveen, describing the site
location, development units, site plans, renderings, landscape concepts, common
tenants in commerce parks, proposed buffering, traffic circulation, and referenced other
developments. Mr. Morris described site amenities proposed in Development Unit 2,
housing trends, and off-premise signage. Mr. Morris concluded by listing various project
benefits. Mr. Morris then introduced Item Nos. 11 (GPA-LV-5-22-7) and 12 (Z-73-22-7),
by the name of Envision Dobbins 202 West, describing the site location and how this
development furthers the Loop 202 technology corridor. Mr. Morris described the site
ATTACHMENT C
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
plan, project phases, renderings, common tenants in commerce parks, and provided an
example of a common distribution facility. Mr. Morris stated that there are performance
criteria for distribution facilities embedded in the proposed PUD Narrative. Mr. Morris
described the project benefits and concluded by summarizing the outreach conducted
on these cases.
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Dan Penton stated that on case Z-75-22-8, staff was not in favor of the initial
multifamily zoning proposed there. Mr. Penton discussed multifamily projects in the area
and has concerns with the buildings proposed on case Z-72-22-8 due to the height,
scale, and lack of commercial uses. Mr. Penton stated that the frontage along 59th
Avenue that is proposed looks bad due to the building locations. Mr. Penton discussed
a bicycle way and improving connectivity on the site. Mr. Penton has concerns with the
proposed
Phil Hertel registered to speak on these items but was disconnected during public
comment portion.
APPLICANT RESPONSE:
None.
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION:
Carlos Ortega stated that too many projects are being presented at one time by the
applicant and feels overwhelmed. Mr. Ortega would like for applicants to present their
projects individually instead.
Rebecca Perrera would like to see refinement in the building elevations and became
confused by the numerous projects discussed at one time.
Chair Abegg would like to see more details on each case and is not supportive of
distribution facilities as primary uses permitted in sites. Chair Abegg would like to see a
stipulation reserving a grocery store location in the area.
Mr. Morris responded that he would gladly present these cases separately in the future.
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3
rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting
February 13, 2023
Request From
S-1 (Approved R1-6 PCD), and S-1 (Approved R-2 PCD)
Request To
PUD
Proposed Use
Industrial, Commerce Park, and Multifamily Residential
Location
Southeast corner of 59th Avenue and Elliot Road
VPC DISCUSSION:
Item No. 9 (GPA-LV-4-22-8) and Item No. 10 (Z-72-22-8) were heard together.
Ten members of the public registered to speak on these items. Six of the members
donated their time.
APPLICANT PRESENTATION:
Ben Tate, representing the applicant with Withey Morris PLC., introduced himself and
the proposed project. Mr. Tate described the location of the site and discussed the
initial proposal which was divided into two phases. Mr. Tate stated that the current
version of the project has three phases, with the addition of a “casita” or multifamily
phase along the northeastern portion of the site. Mr. Tate added that other changes
include a significant area reduction in Phase 1 which is a mix of commercial and
commerce park uses due to concerns from the neighbors on the scale of the flex
buildings proposed. Mr. Tate discussed the site plans and conceptual elevations
proposed for each phase. Mr. Tate discussed the amenities that will be provided in
each of the units and common areas throughout the residential sites. Mr. Tate
discussed IDM Cares, which is a non-profit arm of IDM, and the two proposed off-
premise signs. Mr. Tate provided a summary of the public outreach conducted and
project benefits.
QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE:
Dean Chiarelli asked for clarification on the street improvements along Dobbins
Road. Mr. Chiarelli described the conditions on Dobbins Road and added that he has
lived in the area and expects more homes to be built along there.
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Carlos Ortega has questions about the donation from the billboards towards public
parks in the area and wants to ensure accountability with those funds. Mr. Tate
responded by discussing the height of the proposed multifamily units and adding that a
total of 579 dwelling units are proposed across the PUD. Mr. Tate added that a
maximum height of 48 feet is proposed for the billboards, which is allowed by the
Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Tate stated that a separate account would be created for the
funds going towards parks.
Chair Abegg asked if the units in the casita product will also have private backyards.
Mr. Tate responded that private backyards will be provided for each unit and that
street improvements will be made on adjacent streets, including a traffic signal at the
adjacent intersection.
Chair Abegg appreciates the dressing of the poles for the billboard signs and
discussed street improvements plus other development in the general area.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Patrick Nasser appreciates the changes made to the layout of the commerce park
portion of the site, but now sees an issue with the impact from this commerce park
area to the proposed casita development next to it. Mr. Nasser asked for the removal
of the commerce park area from the site and wants to know the specific height of
three-story apartments proposed. Mr. Nasser would like clarification on the number of
dwelling units proposed across the entire PUD. Mr. Nasser stated that the density of
18.2 dwelling units per acre is much higher than other multifamily projects in the area
which have a density closer to 12 dwelling units per acre. Mr. Nasser stated the
reducing the height of the multifamily from three to two stories would by default reduce
the density and parking requirements, allowing for more open space. Mr. Nasser
would also like to know the height of the proposed billboard signs.
Gwen Kowalski appreciates the changes made to the project as she lives east of this
development. Ms. Kowalski would like for the warehouse buildings to be re-oriented as
to not block views of the mountains for her, and to help reduce the height further plus
reduce semi-truck traffic in the area. Ms. Kowalski is excited about the new
development but has concerns about the uses proposed.
Kevin Joyner echoes the comments made and added that the community has
concerns with the three stories and density proposed for the multifamily portion of the
site. Mr. Joyner added that the billboards proposed are also of concern.
Dan Penton discussed the proposed billboard locations along the Loop 202 freeway,
noting that there are lots of these already. Mr. Penton is largely opposed to billboards,
although the ones proposed here look better than the others that exist already and
have a community benefits. Mr. Penton stated that these billboards would set a new
minimum standard moving forward and would like for the angle on the displays to be
modified to avoid impacts to the adjacent community. Mr. Penton stated the brightness
of the billboard signs should be reduced and turned off after 10pm. Mr. Penton stated
that the orientation of the two larger commerce park buildings would help block noise
from the freeway to the adjacent casita development unit. Mr. Penton stated that this
latest proposal is a compromise.
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
APPLICANT RESPONSE:
Mr. Tate thanked the committee for the feedback provided.
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION:
None.
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
Date of VPC Meeting
March 20, 2023
Request From
S-1 (Approved R1-6 PCD), and S-1 (Approved R-2 PCD)
Request To
PUD
Proposed Use
Commercial, Commerce Park, and Multifamily
Residential
Location
Southeast corner of 59th Avenue and Elliot Road
VPC Recommendation
Approval, per the staff recommendation with additional
stipulations
VPC Vote:
8-0
VPC DISCUSSION:
Item No. 6 (GPA-LV-4-22-8) and Item No. 7 (Z-72-22-8) were heard together.
Thirty members of the public registered to speak on these items. Thirteen of the
members donated their time.
Staff Presentation:
Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of GPA-LV-4-22-8 and Z-72-22-8.
Mrs. Sanchez Luna discussed the location of the site, the requested zoning
designation, the surrounding land uses, and the proposed General Plan Land Use
Map designation. Mrs. Sanchez Luna summarized policy plans in the area and noted
that the proposed development integrated design elements that supported the plans.
Mrs. Sanchez Luna concluded the presentation by summarizing the staff findings,
summarizing public correspondence, providing the staff recommendation and
proposed stipulations.
Applicant Presentation:
Jason Morris, representing the applicant with Withey Morris, provided an overview of
the proposed cases. He summarized previous requests that included large commerce
park and industrial uses and noted the changes to the current proposal. Mr. Morris
displayed Development Unit 1, explaining changes that have been made to address
community concerns, and summarizing the commercial and commerce park uses
allowed on site. Mr. Morris displayed Development Unit 3 (just east of Development
Unit 1) and summarized the multifamily project noting the setbacks, open space, and
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
March 20, 2023
Page 2
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
building renderings. Mr. Morris displayed Development Unit 2 and summarized the
multifamily project noting the proposed height, amenities, density, and floor plans. Mr.
Morris demonstrated the conceptual view corridor and noted the reduction in proposed
height.
Mr. Morris provided information about IDM Cares, a charitable arm of the IDM
company (the developer). He explained that as part of the PUD they are proposing two
billboards which will be administered by IDM and IDM Cares. Fifty percent of the net
revenue from the billboards will be donated to IDM Cares to be utilized within the
Laveen community. He explained that the billboard provisions including a height
limitation of 48 feet, the locations, and hours limitation. Mr. Morris proposed a
stipulation to limit the PUD to two billboards with a maximum height of 48 feet.
He also proposed a stipulation related to the 50 percent donation and provided
specific language on the slide.
Mr. Morris concluded his presentation by providing an outreach summary and
displayed a slide outlining the project benefits.
Questions from the committee:
None.
Public Comment:
Phil Hertel stated that he was opposed to the proposed density and that the open
space requirements should be increased to fifteen percent. Mr. Hertel asked for more
information regarding school funding. Mr. Hertel requested that the case be continued
to the next committee meeting.
Mrs. Sanchez Luna stated that Breanna Wandrych, who registered to speak, was not
present in the attendee list. Mrs. Sanchez Luna and Chair Lina Abegg confirmed
that Breanna Wandrych was not on the attendee list.
Mark Williams requested that the proposed multifamily have a maximum of two
stories along the easter portion of the site. Mr. Williams stated that the proposed
height did not include the pitch of the roofs and requested a maximum height that
would not restrict views. Mr. Williams stated that he supported medical uses but was
opposed to the proposed density and height. Mr. Williams concluded his comment by
stating that the conceptual views presented were deceitful.
Mrs. Sanchez Luna stated that Ana Alvarado, who registered to speak, was not
present in the attendee list. Chair Abegg requested to continue to the next public
comment.
Shaina Bontrager stated that she was opposed to the proposed density and the
three-story height. Ms. Bontrager added that she agreed with Mark Williams’ comment
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
March 20, 2023
Page 3
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
regarding the conceptual view.
Carmen Terrell stated that she was opposed to the entire PUD and would rather see
agricultural uses like a community garden. Ms. Terrell added that the surrounding
properties were not taken into consideration. Ms. Terrell noted that a portion of the
housing should be low-income. Ms. Terrell concluded her comment by reiterating that
she was opposed to the entire PUD and request the dates for the next hearings.
Danielle Younkin stated that she supported Mark Williams comment regarding the
single-story multifamily proposal, density, and height restrictions. Ms. Younkin added
that the conceptual views presented were deceitful. Ms. Younkin requested that the
off-premise signage have a maximum height of 30 feet. Ms. Younkin concluded her
comment by stating that the applicant could not guarantee certain commercial uses on
Development Unit 1.
Cassandra Gannis stated that the applicant has ignored the opposition for off-
premise signage. Ms. Gannis stated that she was opposed to the proposed three-story
multifamily housing and requested more commercial uses.
David Barrera stated that he was opposed to the proposed density. Mr. Barrera
stated that an increase in population would lead to more crime. Mr. Barrera requested
the multifamily development to prohibit low-income rental units or senior living
facilities.
Gwen Kowalski requested that the proposed multifamily development be reduced to
two-stories. Ms. Kowalski noted that the proposed height would eliminate scenic
views. Ms. Kowalski agreed with height restricts to protect scenic views. Ms. Kowalski
supported the revenue for the off-premise signs; however, requested a maximum
height of 30 feet and shut off time of 10:00 p.m. Ms. Kowalski requested that members
that have a conflict of interest and that were on a school board, to remove themselves
from the case.
Josh Younkin stated that the conceptual views were disingenuous. Mr. Younkin
stated that the conceptual view did not provide a ground level perspective. Mr.
Younkin stated that he was opposed to the proposal.
Sean Goughan stated that he was opposed to the proposed density and height. Mr.
Goughan requested the case to be continued. Mr. Goughan added that he was
opposed to low-income housing.
Katalin Rivera stated that the proposed changes have been insufficient. Ms. Rivera
reiterated that the conceptual view was deceitful and that scenic views will be
obstructed. Ms. Rivera requested the case to be continued so that the applicant could
address the community’s concerns.
Mrs. Sanchez Luna stated that Andrew Norlen, who registered to speak, was not
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
March 20, 2023
Page 4
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
present in the attendee list.
Mrs. Sanchez Luna stated that Felicia Chavez, who registered to speak, was not
present in the attendee list.
Maria Reagin stated that she was opposed to the PUD. Ms. Reagin requested the off-
premise signs to have a maximum height of 30 feet. Ms. Reagin requested stipulations
to be added that would limit the type of commercial businesses allowed in
Development Unit 1. Ms. Reagin added that she agreed with Phil Hertel’s comments
and Mark Williams’ comments.
Dan Penton stated that he supported the proposed PUD but still had some concerns.
Mr. Penton requested three-story buildings to be located centrally. Mr. Penton noted
that the surrounding population needed safer pedestrian pathways and areas. Mr.
Penton added that he had concerns with traffic and requested limited commercial
traffic. Mr. Penton requested cross sections to be modified to support a safe
pedestrian atmosphere. Mr. Penton added that development was inevitable. Mr.
Penton stated that he supported one off-premise sign and the proposed height. Mr.
Penton requested the hours of operation to be reduced. Mr. Penton concluded his
comment by requesting the applicant to address the community concerns.
Carlos Ortega asked if the twelve members who donated their time to Dan Penton
agreed with his perspective. Chair Abegg stated that members donated their time
because they support Dan Penton’s perspective. Mr. Penton stated that he
incorporates the community’s opinion into his public comment.
Dean Chiarelli requested the applicant to clarify if the proposed height exceeded the
current zoning designation. Mr. Chiarelli asked if the proposed off-premise signage
height of 45 feet exceeded the allowed height in the Zoning Ordinance.
Applicant Response:
Mr. Morris stated that the proposed height would be allowed in the current R-2 zoning
designation. Mr. Morris stated that off-premise signage became and allowed use when
the freeway corridor was established by the City Council. Mr. Morris added that there
were no other off-premise signs in the area. He stated that the proposed development
includes an additional 87 units than that allowed in the underlying zoning designation.
Mr. Morris added that if the proposal had a maximum height of two-stories, then that
would increase the density of the PUD. Mr. Morris stated that one- and two-story
buildings will be located adjacent to existing single-family residential uses. Mr. Morris
noted that the conceptual views were taken from a height of 25 to 35 feet to
demonstrate visibility above perimeter walls and houses.
Mr. Morris reiterated that the City Council has allowed the use of off-premise signage
in the freeway corridor and noted that the revenue would benefit Laveen. Mr. Morris
again mentioned the proposed stipulation to limit the PUD to two billboards with
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
March 20, 2023
Page 5
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
a maximum height of 48 feet and other standards they have agreed to related to
billboard regulations in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Morris added that the proposed
PUD has addressed community concerns and that the proposed uses were
compatible with the freeway corridor. Mr. Morris noted that the development would
also provide significant street improvements.
Committee Discussion:
Rebecca Perrera stated that she wanted to address some comments she heard
regarding conflict of interest and school board members. Ms. Perrera stated that a
non-salary board member does not constitute a conflict of interest.
Vice Chair Stephanie Hurd requested members of the public to share their support or
opposition before the meeting.
Motion:
Vice Chair Stephanie Hurd motioned to recommend approval of Z-72-22-8 as
presented (per the staff recommendation and additions proposed by the applicant)
along with the following additions:
Fifty percent donation being broken down into minimum 25 percent of revenue to
rental assistance and minimum 15 percent to Olney Park as part of the total 50
percent.
The following shall be provided for public street facing elevations:
o 25% Min. Gglazing and metal railing
o 10% Min. Bbrick veneer
o 15% Min. Hhardie plank
o 50% Max. Sstucco
Apartment elevations shall feature large balconies and deep overhangs to visually
create layered volumes and break up the mass of each building type.
Balconies are encouraged to orient toward the streets, where possible.
A minimum of three (3) apartment types are provided.
A stipulation to update the billboard provisions to include branded screening on the
backside of the billboard.
Jennifer Rouse seconded the motion.
Ms. Perrera thanked the community and the applicant for their input and stated that
the proposal has changed since it was last presented to the community. Vice Chair
Hurd stated that the applicant has had a lot of progress in their proposal and that it
would benefit Laveen.
Vote:
8-0-0, Motion passed with Committee Members Barraza, Chiarelli, Jensen, Ortega,
Perrera, Rouse, Hurd, and Abegg in favor.
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
March 20, 2023
Page 6
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Recommended Stipulations:
1.
An updated Development Narrative for the Elliot 202 PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with Development Narrative
date stamped March 9, 2023, as modified by the following stipulations.
a.
Front Cover, add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]”
b.
Page 7, Section C. List of Uses, Development Unit 1, Prohibited Uses:
Remove “Publicly operated buildings or properties” from this list.
c.
Page 7, Section C. List of Uses, Development Unit 1, Prohibited Uses:
Add “Multifamily residential.”
d.
Page 7, Section C. List of Uses, Development Unit 1, Performance
Criteria for Distribution Uses, modify this section as follows:
No distribution and large-scale wholesale facilities are permitted as a
primary use for a time period of 4 years from the date of rezoning
approval.
* For the purposes of this PUD, “large-scale wholesale” is defined
as wholesale as a primary use for an individual user occupying
more than 50% of any individual building.
e.
Page 9, Development Standards – Development Unit 1, Parking
Standards, add an Electric Vehicle Parking standards section with the
following: Minimum Percentage of installed Level 2 EV Charging
Stations. 2% of Required Parking. A minimum of 20 electric vehicle
charging spaces shall be required for the overall development (DUs 1, 2,
and 3).
f.
Page 9, Development Standards – Development Unit 1, Sidewalk and
Trails, modify the SUP standards as follows:
A 10-foot wide detached concrete Shared Use Path (SUP) shall be
provided along the west property line within a 20-foot wide Shared Use
Path Easement (SUPE) or sidewalk easement to be dedicated to the
city.
g.
Page 13, Development Standards – Development Unit 2, Maximum
Density, Add the following:
Maximum 700 units for the overall PUD area
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
March 20, 2023
Page 7
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
h.
Page 13, Development and Landscape Standards for Development Unit
2: Add the header “Development Standards – Development Unit 2”
before development standards table.
i.
Page 13, Development Standards – Development Unit 2, Sidewalk and
Trails, modify the SUP standards as follows:
A 10-foot wide detached concrete Shared Use Path (SUP) shall be
provided along the west property line within a 20-foot wide Shared Use
Path Easement (SUPE) or sidewalk easement to be dedicated to the
city.
j.
Page 14, Development Standards – Development Unit 2, Parking
Standards, add an Electric Vehicle Parking standards section with the
following: Minimum Percentage of installed Level 2 EV Charging
Stations: 2% of Required Parking. Minimum Percentage of EV Capable
spaces: 5%. A minimum of 20 electric vehicle charging spaces shall be
required for the overall development (DUs 1, 2, and 3).
k.
Page 16, Development Standards – Development Unit 3, Maximum
Density, Add the following:
Maximum 700 units for the overall PUD area.
l.
Page 16, Development and Landscape Standards for Development Unit
3: Add the header “Development Standards – Development Unit 3”
before the development standards table.
m.
Page 17, Development Standards – Development Unit 3, Sidewalk and
Trails, modify the SUP standards as follows:
A 10-foot wide detached concrete Shared Use Path (SUP) shall be
provided along the west property line within a 20-foot wide Shared Use
Path Easement (SUPE) or sidewalk easement to be dedicated to the
city.
n.
Page 17, Development Standards – Development Unit 3, Parking
Standards, add an Electric Vehicle Parking standards section with the
following: Minimum Percentage of installed Level 2 EV Charging
Stations: 2% of Required Parking. Minimum Percentage of EV Capable
spaces: 5%. A minimum of 20 electric vehicle charging spaces shall be
required for the overall development (DUs 1, 2, and 3).
o.
Page 16, Development Standards – Development Unit 3, Building
Setbacks, modify the South (Adjacent to Unit 2) to 15 feet.
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
March 20, 2023
Page 8
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
P.
PAGE 24, DEVELOPMENT UNIT 2 AND DEVELOPMENT UNIT 3
DESIGN GUIDELINES, A. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, DESIGN
GUIDELINES FOR APARTMENT AND CARRIAGE UNIT
ELEVATIONS, MODIFY THE PUBLIC STREET ELEVATIONS AS
FOLLOWS:
PUBLIC STREET FACING:
25% MIN. GLAZING AND METAL RAILING
10% MIN. BRICK VENEER
15% MIN. HARDIE PLANK
50% MAX. STUCCO
Q.
PAGE 24, DEVELOPMENT UNIT 2 AND DEVELOPMENT UNIT 3
DESIGN GUIDELINES, A. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, DESIGN
GUIDELINES FOR APARTMENT AND CARRIAGE UNIT
ELEVATIONS, MODIFY AS FOLLOWS:
APARTMENT ELEVATIONS SHALL FEATURE LARGE
BALCONIES AND DEEP OVERHANGS TO VISUALLY
CREATE LAYERED VOLUMES AND BREAK UP THE MASS
OF EACH BUILDING TYPE.
BALCONIES ARE ENCOURAGED TO ORIENT TOWARD THE
STREETS, WHERE POSSIBLE.
A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) APARTMENT BUILDING TYPES
ARE PROVIDED.
R.
PAGE 25, F. SIGNS, ADD THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE AFTER
THE FIRST PARAGRAPH:
THERE SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF TWO DIGITAL
BILLBOARDS EACH AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 48 FEET.
ANY OFF-PREMISE SIGN SHALL INCLUDE BRANDED
SCREENING ON THE BACKSIDE.
pS.
Page 26, Section G. Sustainability, 1. City Enforced Standards, move
the third bullet point related to recycling to the Developer Goal section.
2.
Page 27, Circulation Systems: Remove “future development to dedicate and
construct all typical half street right-of way and roadways necessary to serve
the development”.
3.
The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct the south side of Elliot
Road from 55th Avenue to the 202 Freeway, as required by the Tierra Montana
Master Street Plan and as approved by the Planning and Development
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
March 20, 2023
Page 9
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Department.
4.
The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and fully construct 59th Avenue, as
required by the Tierra Montana Master Street Plan and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
5.
The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and fully construct Carver Road, as
required by the Tierra Montana Master Street Plan and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
6.
The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study including a signal warrant
analysis for this development at the intersection of 59th Avenue and Elliot
Road. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study has
been reviewed and approved by the city. The developer shall be responsible for
cost and construction of traffic signal or If traffic signal is not warranted upon
opening, the developer will be required to provide 50% contribution toward the
traffic signal in an escrow account to the Street Transportation Department, as
required by the approved traffic impact study.
7.
The developer shall submit a sight distance analysis for all driveways located
along 59th Avenue. Sight distance must comply with the Street AASHTO
requirements and Transportation Departments Planning and Design Manual
and as approved by the Street Transportation Department.
8.
Existing irrigation facilities along public streets are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land
rights and establish the appropriate process to relocate the facility.
9.
The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
10.
A 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated along
Carver Road and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be
constructed within the easement in accordance with the MAG supplemental
detail and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
11.
A 20-foot-wide shared-use path easement (SUPE) shall be dedicated along the
east side of 59th Avenue and a minimum 10-foot-wide shared used path (SUP)
shall be constructed within the easement in accordance with the MAG
supplement detail and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
12.
The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-72-22-8
March 20, 2023
Page 10
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
operational characteristics of Goodyear Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the
templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved
by the City Attorney.
13.
In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials
14.
Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
15.
PRIOR TO OBTAINING A PERMIT FOR AN OFF-PREMISE SIGN
(BILLBOARD), THE APPLICANT MUST EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF PHOENIX, OUTLINING THE UTILIZATION OF 50% OF THE
NET PROFITS FROM THE PROPOSED BILLBOARDS WITH SPECIFIC
REGARD TO THE FOLLOWING:
SUBSIDIZATION OF RENT FOR LAVEEN RESIDENTS VIA IDM
CARES;
LAVEEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT;
CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS OPERATIONS FOR OLNEY PARK NEAR
THE INTERSECTION OF 59TH AND OLNEY AVENUES, AS
MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT.
THE 50% DONATION SHALL BE BROKEN DOWN INTO MINIMUM 25% OF
REVENUE TO RENTAL ASSISTANCE AND MINIMUM 15% TO OLNEY
PARK AS PART OF THE TOTAL 50%.
THE AGREEMENT SHALL REMAIN IN FORCE AS LONG AS THE
BILLBOARDS ARE OPERATIONAL OR UNTIL A CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT
OF TWO MILLION DOLLARS HAS BEEN DONATED.
Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:
Staff recommends clarifying the language for Stipulation No. 1.r. regarding the
branded screening for billboards.