Attachment C - VPC Summary - Z-84-22-7.pdf

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-84-22-7 – REVISED
Date of VPC Meeting 
February 8, 2022 
Request From:  
C-2 HGT/WVR
Request To:  
C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR
Proposed Use: 
Multifamily residential 
Location 
Approximately 315 feet south of the southeast corner of 
83rd Avenue and McDowell Road
VPC Recommendation 
Approval per the staff recommendation with an 
additional stipulation  
VPC Vote 
9-2
VPC DISCUSSION: 
No members of the public registered to speak on this item.  
Committee member Christopher Demarest left during this item, bringing quorum to 11. 
Staff Presentation: 
Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of the rezoning case Z-84-22-7. 
Mrs. Sanchez Luna discussed the location of the site, the requested zoning designation, 
the surrounding land uses, and the General Plan Land Use Map designation. Mrs. 
Sanchez Luna displayed the site plan and elevations and noted the open space areas 
and existing landscaping along 83rd Avenue and McDowell Road. Mrs. Sanchez Luna 
concluded the presentation by summarizing the staff findings and providing the staff 
recommendation and proposed stipulations.  
Applicant Presentation: 
William Allison, representing the applicant with Withey Morris, provided an overview of 
the proposed rezoning case. Mr. Allison summarized the size of the site, current zoning 
designation, proposed development, and noted the proximity to the Maryvale Village 
Core. Mr. Allison displayed the proposed site plan and noted the number of units, 
height, and the proposed open space. Mr. Allison concluded his presentation by 
displaying the elevations and noted other extend stay hotel conversions to multifamily.  
ATTACHMENT C

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Questions from the committee:  
 
Christopher Demarest asked if the property owner was Single Properties. Mr. Allison 
stated that the future property owner would be Capital Investments.  
 
Saundra Cole asked if the proposed development would house families. Mr. Allison 
stated that due to the size of the majority of the units, they expected families and 
children. Ms. Cole asked if the development would accommodate for child safety due to 
the proximity of two arterial streets. Ms. Cole asked if rental rates would accommodate 
seniors and families. Mr. Allison stated that the rental rate would be attainable for both 
families and seniors. Mr. Allison added that the reconversion would allow for attainable 
rates.  
 
Viri Hernandez asked if there was a specific percentage of the units proposed for 
affordable housing. Ms. Hernandez asked staff for clarification on how the proposed 
development would help the housing crisis. Mrs. Sanchez Luna stated that Housing 
Phoenix Plan promoted additional housing uses within the City. Mrs. Sanchez Luna 
stated that the reconversion would provide additional housing within the City. Ms. 
Hernandez asked how staff is assessing projects to ensure affordability. Ms. 
Hernandez stated she would like some information on affordable housing. Mrs. 
Sanchez Luna stated that the Housing Department could possibly provide the 
information, but staff could not stipulate affordable housing.  
 
Jennifer Fostino voiced her support for the reconversion but stated that the proposal 
lacked amenities. Ms. Fostino stated that other multifamily developments always had 
numerous amenities and requested a stipulation to be added to increase the number of 
amenities. Ms. Fostino stated that she was opposed to the railings in the elevations.  
 
Chair Gene Derie asked if the existing hotel units already had one- and two-bedroom 
units or if additional construction would be required. Mr. Allison stated that the hotel 
already had suits with one- and two-bedroom units and that the floor plan would not be 
changing. Chair Derie asked if the existing suits and studios had kitchen facilities. Mr. 
Allison confirmed kitchen facilities were already provided but that they would be 
renovated. Mr. Allison added that the proposed development would have a laundry 
facility rather than individual laundry appliances.  
 
Ms. Fostino asked staff if they were able to add a stipulation that would require 
additional amenities such as ramadas, game area, etc. Mrs. Sanchez Luna confirmed 
that a stipulation could be added. Mr. Allison stated that he supported the additional 
amenity stipulation.  
 
Sandra Oviedo asked if the building would be demolished. Mr. Allison stated that the 
structures would remain but would undergo some refurbishment. Ms. Oviedo stated 
that Maryvale residents needed employment opportunities and that the site could 
benefit from an office development rather than multifamily.  
 
Warren Norgaard asked if other renovations would be made other than the basic 
refurbishment of the building. Mr. Allison stated that there would be upgrades to the 
landscaping and façade, but they also supported an additional stipulation to require 
more amenities. Mr. Allison added that there would also be some renovation to the 
interior of the building.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Ms. Cole echoed Jennifer Fostino’s comments and asked if they the proposed 
development would have enough parking for residents and guest. Mr. Allison stated 
that not all parking would be covered. Mr. Allison noted that a stipulation would require 
uncovered parking to be shaded using vegetation. Mr. Allison added that the parking 
requirements would be addressed through the site planning process.  
 
Ms. Oviedo asked the committee if a mixed-use development involving multifamily and 
offices would be more appropriate. Ms. Cole stated that she did not support a mixed-
use development if families would be living in the development. Ms. Oviedo stated that 
an office development would be appropriate since it would allow for employment 
opportunities. Ms. Hernandez and Chair Derie stated that the applicant is not 
proposing an office development. Chair Derie stated that Sandra Oviedo could vote to 
oppose the proposed rezoning development.  
 
Ms. Cole stated that additional information would be needed on the final product before 
a recommendation could be made. Chair Derie stated that the committee needed more 
information on the amenities that would be provided.  
 
Vice Chair Jeff O’Toole stated that supported the multifamily development because it 
is an existing development rather than vacant land. Vice Chair O’Toole voiced his 
support for a stipulation regarding amenities.  
 
Rosa Berrelleza asked for additional information on pedestrian pathways and if 
speedbumps would be provided on site. Mr. Allison stated that when pedestrian 
pathways cross vehicular drive isles they would be treated to visual contrast the road. 
Mr. Allison added that that was a stipulation in the staff report.  
 
Public Comment:  
 
None.  
 
Committee Discussion:  
 
Mr. Norgaard stated that he would like to add a stipulation regarding amenities. Mrs. 
Sanchez Luna asked if the committee would like to stipulate the number of amenities, 
or the type of amenities provided. Mr. Norgaard stated that he did not have specific 
amenities in mind but was open to ideas.  
 
Chair Derie requested to see the proposed site plan. Chair Derie asked for confirmation 
of limited interior parking. Mr. Allison confirmed that there would be limited parking in 
the center of the development. Mr. Allison stated that committees in the past have 
stipulated an amenities package and specified the amenities to be provided. Chair 
Derie stated that ramadas, barbeque areas, and tot lots would be beneficial. Ms. 
Fostino stated that she would like to see a dog park. Mr. Allison stated that they were 
supportive of the proposed amenities. Ms. Cole asked who would maintain the 
amenities. Mr. Allison stated that the multifamily maintenance would cover the 
amenities. Chair Derie asked if dog waste bags and trash cans would be in the dog 
park. Mr. Allison confirmed that those would be provided.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Motion:  
Warren Norgaard motioned to recommend approval of Z-84-22-7, per the staff 
recommendation with the following additional stipulation:  
 
The following amenities shall be provided and dispersed throughout the 
development, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:  
• Ramadas 
• BBQ  
• Tot lot  
• Dog park  
 
Ken DuBose second the motion.  
 
Ms. Oviedo asked if the proposed development would have units for rent or for sale. 
Mr. Allison confirmed that the proposal was for a rental development.  
 
Vote:  
9-2, Motion to recommend approval passed with Committee Members Barba, 
Berrelleza, Cole, DuBose, Fostino, Norgaard, Valenzuela, O’Toole, and Derie in favor 
and Committee Members Hernandez and Oviedo in opposition.  
 
Recommended Stipulations:  
 
1.  
Upon complete redevelopment or development that increases the cumulative 
floor area by more than 15% from that depicted on the site plan date stamped 
October 27, 2022, building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior 
accent materials, and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as 
brick, stone, colored textured concrete, or stucco, to provide a decorative 
aesthetic treatment, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.  
 
 
2.  
The landscape setback along McDowell Road and 83rd Avenue shall be planted 
with a minimum 50% 2-inch caliper trees, minimum 25% 3-inch caliper trees, and 
minimum 25% 4-inch caliper trees, as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. Where possible, the developer shall use existing 
trees and landscaping to meet the landscaping requirements.  
 
               
3. 
Where landscape areas will be replenished, a minimum of 10% of the required 
shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native nectar species, and shall be planted 
in groups of three or more, as approved by the Planning and Development 
Department.  
 
 
4. 
All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2- 
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed 
throughout the parking area and achieve 10 percent shade at maturity, as 
approved by Planning and Development Department.  
 
 
5.  
Where pedestrian walkways cross drive aisles, the pathway shall be constructed 
with decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or another treatment 
material, other than those used to pave parking surfaces and drive aisles, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
6.  
THE FOLLOWING AMENITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND DISPERSED 
THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING 
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:  
 
 
 
A.  
RAMADAS  
 
 
 
 
B.  
BBQ  
 
 
 
 
C.  
TOT LOT  
 
 
 
 
D.  
DOG PARK  
 
 
6. 
7.  
Bicycle infrastructure shall be provided as described below and as approved by 
the Planning and Development Department.  
 
 
 
a. 
A minimum of 10 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through 
Inverted U and/or artistic racks, or in a secure room and located 
throughout the site including near the centralized open space and 
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning 
Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.  
 
 
 
 
b. 
One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and 
maintained on site within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance. 
The bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of 
high visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where 
applicable. The repair station shall include: standard repair tools affixed to 
the station; a tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the 
ground; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin 
freely while making adjustments to the bike.  
 
 
7. 
8. 
Upon complete redevelopment or development that increases the cumulative 
floor area by more than 15% from the depicted on the site plan date stamped 
October 27, 2022, a minimum 6-foot-wide sidewalk shall be provided along the 
south side of McDowell Road and be detached with a minimum 10-foot-wide 
landscaped strip located between the back of the sidewalk and back of curb, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department. The landscape strip 
will be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper trees planted 20 feet on center or in 
equivalent groupings with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree. Where utility conflict 
exists, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department 
on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.   
 
 
8. 
9. 
The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development 
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, 
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA 
accessibility standards. 
 
 
9. 
10.  
If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall 
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the 
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to 
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
10. 
11. 
If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the 
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified 
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the 
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations. 
 
 
11. 
12. 
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the 
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot 
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the 
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials. 
 
 
12. 
13.  
Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa 
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning 
application file for record. 
 
Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:  
None.