ASSET SECURITY TRACKING V4 CI D500 04-06-23.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2023-04-26)

View PDF Item 22 Meeting page

Extracted text (via ocr_local) 8102 characters
Office of Procurement Services

GOODS AND SERVICES
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FORM
This form is to be used when a department believes an acquisition is considered Competition Impracticable and the acquisition
dollar amount is above $10,000. The Chief Procurement Officer can approve purchases up to $100,000. Board of Supervisors
approval is required if the acquisition is over $100,000. This form must be submitted for approval to: Office of Procurement
Services | 301 W Jefferson Street Suite 700 | Phoenix, AZ 85003, Fax number: 602.506.6766. The signed form must be retained
in the purchasing file. Unless approved by the Board of Supervisors in a formal agenda item or the Chief Procurement Officer in
a formal Contract a Cl form is valid from July 1 thru June 30th of each Fiscal Year.

DEPARTMENT NAME Maricopa County Sheriff's Office/Special Investigations Division DEPARTMENT RX#

PROPOSED CONTRACT VENDOR NEED IDENTIFIED Date: 1/19/2022 perosseD
Company: Asset Security Tracking and Recovery
Address: PO Box 2182 Dat 10/49/2022 arabe

City, State: Sun City, AZ QUOTED PRICE: 46-977 45 CAD 960-751
Zip/Postal Code: | 85372 $131,611.75 Eff 42/30/2009

Phone: (602) 309-3530 Accounting String: 4/06/2023
Fax: 602-426-8179 3 Alloy Cx 8 2g prawa)
Contact Name: | Mike Carmody 4 7. | p<

tH

DESCRIPTION OF GOODS OR SERVICES REQUIRED: —_ —_
The estimated cost of this Procurement is: v < $100k > $100k

Is this a Technology Procurement? [ |ves WA No

The purchase is for covert surveillance systems utilized for criminal investigations. The equipment involved the purchase of
complete covert camera assemblies utilizing the American Electric Holophane housing, Panasonic camera and sierra wireless
RV55 dual band router. These devices are utilized in various criminal investigations throughout Maricopa County. These
tactical camera systems are placed on streetlight poles and continuously record activities and stream those activities to
web-based computers which record the events for the Investigators to watch and document activities as evidence. This
equipment would allow detectives to observe criminal activities from afar and record without compromising the Investigation
during surveillance.

COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE CATEGORY (check applicable box, attach dacumentation or provide explanation below.)
Maricopa County Procurement Code MC1-351 states: “Competition Impracticable” meansan acquisition where, competition is
impractical because of standardization, warranty, or other factors as approved by the Board of Supervisors.

NOTE: The following are unlikely to be sufficient Competition Impracticable justifications:

‘Personal or department preference for a product or vendor

* Department perception that the vendor Is the best qualified (this should be determined through a competitive process)
‘Lack of department planning resulting in limited time to conduct a competitive procurement

* Special incentive or deal offered (can be assessed In open and competitive solicitation)

*Department convenience

[_Jsrant specified (supporting documents attached) onuaeee* additions, or upgrades available
[malting lists, subscriptions or media advertising Mitaiboe available from only one source (no other

[V arranty voided if service provided by other contract vendor [other proprietary situation

[V/]other (Provide written explanation below)

THIS ISA COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT BECAUSE (attach additional page if needed):

This equipment is essential for the covert operations conducted within Maricopa County. The equipment is
utilized by several divisions within the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, as well as assisting with of agencies
investigations in a joint partnership. These investigations are sensitive in nature and the need for updated
technology to combat the criminal organizations are a must. Asset Security Tracking and Recovery is the sole
provider of this equipment and technology being utilized by the government to combat the criminal organizations
in the metro Phoenix area. The covert streetlight head surveillance camera with its contained camera and
broadband video transmission is the only one of its kind in the country for use with the City of Phoenix and
surrounding suburb cities. Asset Security Tracking and Recovery also has a patent pending on this exclusive
design. We have purchased these systems from ASTR since FY17 to remain consistent with inventory and
operational familiarity as well as being the only covert camera system approved by cities they are used within.

SEARCH
Asearch was conducted consisting of: (check all that apply) RESULTS
C] Market research []eublic notice given, list [Jno alternatives were identified
Other vendors contacted Other no alternatives were deemed acceptable
O O i ecause (explain below):

Describe the search from above in detail:
Due to the sensitivity of the investigations this product is utilized for, Asset Security Tracking

And Recovery is the sole provider/manufacturer of this product and technology being sold and
operated in the city of Phoenix metro area as well as it's surrounding suburb cities.

PRICE
MC1-352-B states: The Using Agency requesting a Competition Impracticable Procurement shall provide written evidence
to support a Competition impracticable determination containing an explanation of why the proposed procurement
process is advantageous to the County; and the scope, duration, and estimated total dollar value of the procurement.

Price has been fairly and reasonably established by: Cc] Comparison to public sector contract pricing
prycomearison to previous comparable purchases [71 piscount off published catalog pricing

from a different vendor Cc] Market survey
Cc] Independent estimate Other, explain:

Describe methodology and results (attach any written supporting data, e.g., survey or market analysis):

| have found the pricing for the LED Tactical Pole Cameras produced by Asset Security
Tracking and Recovery are comparable to others in this market. The other companies do not
produce a suitable LED Covert Light that is authorized to be hung on City of Phoenix Light
Poles or the surrounding suburb cities, which look like the ordinary streetlight.

12/30/22 - MCSO is requesting approval of an additional $26,592.60 to purchase two additional pole camera systems
using OCDETF funds.

04/06/23 - MCSO is requesting approval of an additional $88,642 to purchase ten additional cameras using OCDETF funds.

CERTIFICATIONS

I certify:

1) | recognize that the Maricopa County Procurement Code requires the use of competitive solicitations unless
exempted by law. | have reviewed the information and materials relevant to this procurement of goods and services,
and am requesting approval of an exception to the competitive process for the reasons described;

2) the price to be paid to the proposed vendor is fair, reasonable, and provides the best value to Maricopa County; and
3) this request for an exception to the competitive solicitation process is not the result of inadequate advance planning
or for purposes of securing the services of a preferred vendor.

Department Head or Department Head Delegate Signature (Required)
Jim Prindiville dim Prindiville seeeewiars"" — 40/19/2022

Printed Name Signature Date

Office of Procurement Services

The CPO can approve procurements up to $100,000. If this request ls over $100,000 it must be submitted as
an agenda Item to the Board of Supervisors for consideration.

Approved/Recommended for Approval
Kevin Tyne, Director, OPS fen Tye bassozwozt izes” 4/24/2022

Printed Name Signature Date

Office of Enterprise Technology (if this procurement is classified as a technology procurement it must be
forwarded to OET for coordination and/or approval. If this procurement request is not approved by OET, the form will
be returned to the requestor.)

Approved. Recommended purchase is in line with Maricopa County's strategic technology plan or currently installed
equipment or service, and is considered to be a competition impracticable procurement.

| Not Approved. Reasoning:

Printed Name Signature Date