Exhibit D - Proposed Westpark CMPA Narrative.pdf
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
198402 characters
5R PLZZ-25-0010 RECEIVED JUN 4 2026 WD
Exhibit D
Colliers Engineering & Design
Developer:
Garrett Development Corporation
Tyler Garrett
6900 East Camelback Road, Suite 240
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Owners:
KEMF SR East LLC; KEMF SR North LLC; KEMF SR West LLC; KEMF Westwind East LLC; KEMF Westwind
North LLC; KEMF Westwind SH LLC; KEMF Westwind West LLC; KEMF WP 2.3 LLC; KEMF WP 3 East
LLC, KEMF WP 3 West LLC, KEMF WP COMMERCIAL LLC, KEMF WWG 1, LLC
Nancy Ball, Vice President
PO Box 10392
Phoenix, AZ 85064
GDC OZ, LLC
Jeff Garrett, Manager
6900 East Camelback Road, Suite 240
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Triple G Farms
Kenneth Gingg
29115 West Broadway Road
Buckeye, AZ 85326
Planning & Engineering:
Colliers Engineering & Design
Rob Gubser, AICP
Zach Hilgart, PE
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Traffic:
United Civil Group
Keith Winney, PE
2803 N. 7th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85007
**Concurrent Application Submittals include an Amendment to the SilverRock Community
Master Plan, a General Plan Amendment, Abandonment and Annexation Application.
Development Team
Colliers Engineering & Design
A.
Project Introduction and History ....................................................................................... 1
B.
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 3
C.
Current Site Conditions ...................................................................................................... 5
D. Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 6
Land Uses ........................................................................................................................................ 8
Open Space, Pathways and Trails, and Parks ............................................................................... 9
Access and Circulation .................................................................................................................. 10
Schools ........................................................................................................................................... 11
Public Facilities .............................................................................................................................. 11
Phasing ........................................................................................................................................... 12
E. Land Uses and Zoning Districts ........................................................................................... 13
Residential Zoning Districts .......................................................................................................... 15
Non-Residential Zoning Districts ................................................................................................. 20
F. Development Standards....................................................................................................... 25
Residential Use Standards (MDR, MDR Overlay & HDR) ............................................................ 25
Non-Residential Standards (IND, BP, RC & CC) ........................................................................... 29
G. Project Infrastructure ........................................................................................................... 34
Master Drainage Plan ................................................................................................................... 34
Water Master Plan ........................................................................................................................ 35
Wastewater Master Plan .............................................................................................................. 36
Traffic Impact Analysis .................................................................................................................. 36
Table of Contents
Colliers Engineering & Design
Tables
TABLE 1
PARKS REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
TABLE 2
LAND USE TABLE
TABLE 3
PERMITTED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
TABLE 4
MDR DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
TABLE 4a
MDR OVERLAY DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
TABLE 5
HDR DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
TABLE 6
PERMITTED NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
TABLE 7
BUSINESS PARK DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
TABLE 8
INDUSTRIAL DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
Figures
FIGURE 1
AERIAL VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 2
EXISTING CMP
FIGURE 3
EXISTING AND PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
FIGURE 4
EXISTING ZONING
FIGURE 5
COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN
FIGURE 5A
COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN WITH APS SUBSTATION
FIGURE 6A
STREET & CIRCULATION PLAN
FIGURE 6B
STREET CROSS-SECTIONS
FIGURE 6C
STREET CROSS-SECTIONS
FIGURE 7
PARKS & OPEN SPACE PLAN
FIGURE 8
POCKET PARK CONCEPTS
FIGURE 9
LANDSCAPING REPRESENTATIVE EXAMPLES
Appendices
APPENDIX A
CITY OF BUCKEYE TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
APPENDIX B
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ELEVATION EXAMPLES
APPENDIX C
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND EXHIBIT
APPENDIX D
DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN
APPENDIX E
WATER MASTER PLAN
APPENDIX F
WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN
APPENDIX G
OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT
APPENDIX H
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT
APPENDIX I
ECONOMIC & FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS’ WESTPARK COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN
APPENDIX J
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
APPENDIX K
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CONSENT REGARDING SILVERROCK CMP
1
WESTPARK CMP
A.
Project Introduction and History
The Westpark 2026 Community Master Plan Amendment (“2026 CMPA”) shall (i) expand the
boundaries of and (ii) amend portions of the existing Westpark CMP approvals. The original
Westpark CMP was approved in 2000 as a 1,060-acre Community Master Plan (CMP). The
CMP was approved for a mix of land uses including single-family detached and multifamily
residential, schools, park/open spaces, a community park, and community/regional services.
A Minor CMP Amendment was administratively approved in 2008 for Phases 3, 4, and a
portion of Phase 2 offering a commercial/residential overlay and permit a higher density
residential product. With this amendment the overall unit count was increased to 3,470
dwelling units (3,906 units when applying the commercial residential overlay options). A
second Amendment to the CMP was approved in 2022 with modifications including the
incorporation of an industrial overlay west of SR-85, adding an additional 79-acre industrial
property into the Westpark CMP, also introducing optional active adult uses.
Phase 1 of the original Westpark CMP is fully constructed and includes an elementary school,
parks and 1086 single family residential homes. Portions of Phase 2.1 have been constructed
and are currently under construction. Phase 2.1 includes existing detached single family
rental homes and has been platted to include approximately 475 lots. Phase 2.2 includes 847
planned units, 446 of which are currently under construction while the remaining 401 within
Parcels 25, 26 and 27 are not platted. Parcels within Phase 2.2 Parcel 25, 26 and 27 (also
known as Parcels 5, 6 and 18N within the preliminary plat) are included with this 2026 CMPA
and are discussed in detailed later herein and are assigned new Parcel numbers with this
CMPA.
The original Westwind CMP was approved in 2005 and included 807-acres of residential,
commercial and public facilities. No amendments have occurred with this CMP, and the land
uses have not been revised since the original 2005 approved CMP. This 2026 CMPA proposes
to dissolve the Westwind CMP and incorporate 807-acres of land within the Westwind CMP
into the Westpark CMP.
The original SilverRock CMP was approved in 2004 and included approximately 1240-acres
of residential, commercial and public facilities, including a wastewater treatment facility. The
2026 CMPA proposes to incorporate the 782-acres north of the RID canal in the SilverRock
CMP into the Westpark CMP. The 2026 CMPA will also add two additional properties totaling
approximately 130-acres into the Westpark CMP. These properties include a 50-acre
property located west of the West Connector Rd (also known as 269th Avenue) and south of
Lower Buckeye Road and an approximately 80-acre property located at the northern
boundary of the Westwind CMP east of the Wilson Road alignment.
Except for changes to Parcels 25, 26 and 27, the 2026 CMPA does not include changes to
Westpark Phases 1, 2.1, and 2.2. Further, these three phases are used in Westpark’s open
space area totals for single-family residential park requirements.
2
WESTPARK CMP
In summary, the 2026 CMPA for Westpark is a 2,000-acre community master plan (also
known as “Community”, “Development” or “Project”) located north of the RID canal and south
of Interstate 10 between Palo Verde to the west and Rooks Road to the east. See Figure 1,
Aerial Vicinity Map for a detailed boundary of the overall Development. This 2026 CMPA
proposes to incorporate portions of the existing Westpark CMP, portions of the SilverRock
CMP, the Westwind CMP and two additional contiguous parcels into one cohesive Project
known as Westpark. A variety of uses within the boundaries of the Community will ensure
that the Westpark CMP will be a destination point for employment and shopping as well as
a beautiful residential community offering a variety of housing options.
CMP 2026
3
WESTPARK CMP
B.
Executive Summary
This proposed 2026 CMPA will address changing market trends and the evolution of the area
that was once anticipated for large residential master-planned communities. The CMPA
introduces flexibility in development of residential, commercial, business and industrial uses
within the Westpark development area. Buckeye is poised to be a major economic
destination and regional entry point for businesses, jobs and housing options. With ease of
access and proximity to Interstate 10 and Buckeye Municipal Airport, an amendment to the
Westpark CMP that addresses current and future needs of the City all under one cohesive
plan is vital. Following the approval of the 2022 Westpark CMP amendment, this area has
seen the introduction of the Burlington 2 million square foot industrial development utilizing
one of the CMP’s industrial overlays at the southwest corner of 269th Avenue and Warner
Street.
In 2025, after working with the landowner and City staff for over two years, APS acquired a
120 acre parcel south of the southwest corner of Lower Buckeye and Turner Roads. This
acquisition by APS and subsequent construction, will accommodate a 500KV substation, a
230KV substation, a 69KV substation, and a 12KV substation (“APS Substation”). The ultimate
design of the APS Substation show that it will be served by 7 overhead 500KV power lines
and 11 overhead 230KV power lines (“Transmission Lines”). The Transmission Lines have
the capacity to bring 16 gigawatts of power to the APS Substation. Power from the APS
Substations will be distributed throughout Buckeye by 11 overhead 69KV lines while the
immediate area surrounding the APS Substation will be distributed by underground power
lines from the 12KV substation (“Distribution Lines”).
The APS Substation, Transmission Lines and Distribution Lines (collectively, “TS35”) is a
critical piece of infrastructure in APS’s portfolio that will cost well over $1 billion. TS35 gives
the City and the landowner a strategic advantage to accommodate large power users such
as data centers, technology manufacturers, and power intensive logistics users. TS35
combined with the Westpark landowner that has over 2,000 acres surrounding TS35,
provides a rare opportunity to develop a flexible entitlement CMP that takes full advantage
of these combined assets. Few cities are afforded such an opportunity.
Two economic and fiscal studies were completed by Elliot Pollack for the portion of Westpark
running from SR85 to Palo Verde Road and is included in the Appendices of this report. The
studies detail the creation of between 23,000 and 30,000 new jobs and additional tax
revenue of $613.9 million to $823 million dollars to the City of Buckeye. This 2026 CMPA will
eliminate antiquated entitlements and provide the City with a cohesive Development within
a prime economic and employment corridor adjacent to the City’s airport. The proposed
CMPA does not directly impact any of the already developed portions of Westpark and
retains the current permitted uses and development standards within those sections.
4
WESTPARK CMP
This 2026 CMPA proposes to revise and expand the Westpark development in the following
ways:
1. Allow a diversity of employment generating land uses, primarily industrial and business
park, to meet current and future market demands and to take advantage of the APS TS35
infrastructure investment.
2. Create an overall cohesive CMP document, per the revised CMP zoning district, that will
direct development for remaining undeveloped parcels, while maintaining existing
approved development rights and agreements created with past approvals.
3. Provide High Density Residential (HDR) to allow for multi-family development near
employment and commercial uses not to exceed 30 du/ac and 991 units, as well as
incorporating attached and detached residential at a lower density.
4. Revise three parcels (approved previously as Parcels 25, 26 and 27 and now Parcels 23,
24 and 25) within Phase 2.2 of the original Westpark CMP from LDR to MDR to permit
flexibility in development allowing either a standard single family detached platted
development or permit single family detached rental development on a single parcel with
public or private roadways. Note: These are known as Parcels 5, 6, and 18N in the vested
2006 Phase 2 Preliminary Plat.
5. Dissolve the Westwind CMP and incorporate all of the former CMP property into the
Westpark CMP (excluding the APS Substation site.)
6. Incorporate the property north of the RID canal within the existing SilverRock CMP into
the Westpark CMP. Please note, an amendment to SilverRock CMP removing the property
north of the RID canal within the boundary of the SilverRock CMP has been submitted
under separate application.
7. Incorporate the 50-acre GDC OZ LLC property into the Westpark CMP. Please note, a
Minor General Plan Amendment and Annexation is under a separate application.
8. Incorporate the 80-acre Sonoran Heights property into the Westpark CMP.
9. Extend the Industrial and Community Commercial Zoning with MDR overlay to the
centerline of the Warner Street Bridge ROW centerline. Please note, an abandonment of
the planned Warner Street Bridge MC-85 crossing is under separate application.
10. Revise and straighten the alignment of Lower Buckeye Road from Palo Verde Road to
Turner Road.
11. Revise and straighten the alignment of Warner Street from Turner to the West Connector
Road (269th Avenue).
12. Remove the alignment of Warner Street between Turner Road and Palo Verde Road to
create a larger contiguous development parcel.
13. An accompanying General Plan Amendment, Abandonment, and Annexation are a part
of separate submittals.
5
WESTPARK CMP
C.
Current Site Conditions
The Project and surrounding General Plan land use designations, zoning districts, and land
uses are outlined in the table below. General Plan uses and zoning districts are shown in
Figure 3, Existing and Proposed General Plan Designation and Figure 4, Existing Zoning.
Location
General Plan 2040
Zoning
Current Use
Site
Master Planned
Community,
Business Commerce
Planned Community,
Light Industrial,
R1-43 (pending Annexation
approval)
Vacant, agriculture
pre-platted vacant
subdivision,
water campus
North
Neighborhood,
Business Commerce
Rural-43 (Maricopa County)
General Commerce,
Community Center
Large lot residential and
vacant desert
East
Master Planned
Community
Planned Community,
General Commerce
Single Family residential,
agriculture
South
Employment,
Neighborhood
Planned Residential,
Light Industrial,
General Commerce
Rural-43 (Maricopa County)
Residential multi-family
Future 2M SF Burlington
Development
Future APS TS35
Vacant
Agricultural
West
Master Planned
Community,
Neighborhood
Planned Community
Vacant and Agricultural,
Buckeye Municipal Airport
6
WESTPARK CMP
D.
Development Plan
Pursuant to the 2026 CMPA, Westpark is a proposed residential, commercial and industrial
development that will provide nearby employment, recreation and service opportunities.
The following provides additional details of elements proposed with the 2026 CMPA.
1. Revise PODs 1 and 2 as approved with the 2022 Westpark CMP Amendment (2022 CMPA),
which are identified as Parcels 18 and 19 in the 2026 CMPA, from LDR and MDR
respectively to HDR to allow multi-family developments not to exceed 30 du/ac as well as
densities as low as 6 du/ac. The HDR would permit R1-1, MF-1 and MF-2 residential
developments and will adhere to the development standards within the Buckeye
Development Code or as otherwise modified by this CMP.
2. Revise 2022 CMPA Parcels 5, 6 and 18N (identified as parcels 23, 24 and 25 in this CMP)
from LDR to MDR, without any increase in previously approved density, to permit
flexibility in development allowing either a standard single family detached platted
development or permit a single family detached rental development. These parcels are
already planned for single family residential development. The 2026 CMPA will allow for
these parcels to be developed with a detached single-family development on a single-
family lot with a minimum lot size of 45’ x 115’ or on leased premises of similar size
dimensions all while retaining the same street network and infrastructure required by
the City. Meaning while these parcels would accommodate “for rent residences” the
parcels will be developed similarly to any for-sale single family subdivision in the City of
Buckeye and there would be no visual difference to anyone driving through the
community. Under MDR, Developer may record a plat at any time, after obtaining City
approvals, to subdivide the parcels into single family lots. Platted and maximum unit
counts and densities are provided in Table 2 of this 2026 CMPA. Local residential streets
can be developed as either public or private roadways within these parcels. These parcels
may be developed under the R1-3 or R1-6 permitted housing types as defined by the
Buckeye Development Code or as otherwise modified by this 2026 CMPA.
3. Incorporate properties within the existing boundaries of the Westwind CMP (identified
generally as parcel 3, a portion of parcels 4-6, and parcels 7 & 8) in this CMP) into the
Westpark CMP and revise land uses to Industrial, Regional Commercial, and Business
Park (this excludes land within the boundary of the future APS substation). Parcels will
be developed per the Buckeye Development Code unless otherwise modified by this
2026 CMPA.
4. Incorporate properties north of the RID canal within the SilverRock CMP (identified as a
portion of parcel 5 and 6, and parcel 9 in this CMP) into the Westpark CMP and revise
land uses to Industrial. Parcels will be developed per the Buckeye Development Code
unless otherwise modified by this CMP. Please see Appendix K for Acknowledgement
and Consent Regarding Silver Rock CMP document. A separate amendment to the
7
WESTPARK CMP
SilverRock CMP has been submitted to the City of Buckeye, to allow the remainder of the
SilverRock CMP to maintain existing zoning and entitlements, independent of this CMPA.
5. Incorporate the 50-acre GDC OZ LLC property (included as parcel 11 in this CMP) into the
Westpark CMP and revise land uses to Industrial, supporting potential large scale
industrial developments. This property may be developed as I-1 Development will follow
the Buckeye Development Code unless otherwise modified by this CMP. An annexation
application for the 50-acre GDC OZ LLC property has been submitted to the City of
Buckeye. An annexation and a general plan amendment for the 50-acre area has also
been submitted to the City of Buckeye.
6. Incorporate the 80-acre Sonoran Heights property (identified as Parcels 1 and 2 in this
CMP) into the Westpark CMP and revise land uses to Business Park and Commercial uses.
These parcels and uses may be developed as Business Park (BP) and Regional
Commercial (RC) within the Buckeye Development Code unless otherwise modified by
this CMP. A General Plan Amendment has been submitted to the City of Buckeye.
7. Extend the adjacent zoning to the centerline of the current Warner Street Bridge ROW
centerline (assumed center line of the Warner Street Bridge alignment is identified as the
parcel boundaries of parcel 14 and 15 and parcels 16 and 17 within this CMP). The Warner
Street Bridge is no longer necessary, and as such an abandonment of the Warner Street
Bridge ROW has been recently approved by City Council under a separate application.
The removal of the planned ROW and the extension of the zoning to the centerline of the
Warner Street alignment will allow development of the fully zoned parcels.
8. Revise and straighten the alignment of Lower Buckeye Road from Palo Verde Road to
Turner Road matching the existing improvement plan alignment. See attached letter
showing that City engineering and adjacent property owners support this action.
9. Revise and straighten the alignment of Warner Street from Turner Road to West
Connector Road.
10. Remove the alignment of Warner Street west of Turner Road and Palo Verde Road to
create a secure, private, and larger contiguous parcel for potential end user.
Refer to Figure 5, Community Master Plan for proposed land uses.
8
WESTPARK CMP
Land Uses
Residential land uses proposed with this 2026 CMPA include MDR, and existing MDR Overlay
(Parcels 16 & 17 only), and HDR. MDR and MDR Overlay land uses may include single-family
homes, two–family homes (duplexes), townhomes, zero-lot-line homes, court homes, and
other similar product types. Refer to Table 3: Permitted Residential Districts for permitted
MDR and MDR Overlay districts. As approved in the 2022 CMPA, the MDR Overlay in Parcels
16 & 17 may also be developed as MF-1. MDR identified as Parcels 23, 24, and 25, may be
developed as either a single-family subdivision or via a map of dedication under one
ownership to allow for construction of an attached or detached single family residential
rental development. Development within the MDR or MDR Overlay will not exceed densities,
and maximum unit counts as shown on Table 2, Land Use Table.
HDR land uses, for the areas east of SR85, may include multifamily residential products such
as apartments and condominiums not to exceed 30 du/ac and 991 units. HDR development
will provide housing variety and enhance workforce mobility to employment created by
industrial and Business Park developments in the area, and in turn will also act as a buffer
between the high intensity SR85 transportation corridor to the east and the single-family
master planned community to the east. Also, included within the HDR are two-family homes,
townhomes, cottages, cluster type housing, providing the potential for diversification and
options of housing product. Refer to Table 3: Permitted Residential Districts for permitted
HDR districts and Figure 5, Community Master Plan for proposed and existing land uses.
The areas between Palo Verde to the west, Turner to the east, the RID canal to the south
(excluding the APS Substation property) and extending north of Lower Buckeye Road by
approximately ½ mile are proposed primarily as Industrial development. The ultimate
development of this area may be one large Industrial Mega-Site or broken up into smaller
individual parcels, depending on market needs. An area adjacent to the frontage of Palo
Verde Road is established for Business Park development for a depth of 660 feet from back
of right-of-way which is coupled with a 12.5 acre Regional Commercial parcel at the
southwest corner of Palo Verde and Lower Buckeye. A mix of approximately 76 acres of
Regional Commercial and Business Park uses have been ideally situated east of Wilson Road
and just south of I-10 along the northern boundary of Westpark.
Two economic and fiscal studies were completed by Elliot Pollack for the portion of Westpark
running from SR85 to Palo Verde Road and is included in the Appendices of this report. The
studies detail the creation of between 23,000 and 30,000 new jobs and additional tax
revenue of $613.9 million to $823 million dollars to the City of Buckeye. See Appendix I for
the Economic & Fiscal Impact Analysis for the Westpark Community Master Plan. Refer
to Figure 5, Community Master Plan for land use locations.
9
WESTPARK CMP
Open Space, Pathways and Trails, and Parks
A series of interconnected pathways and trails were approved within Westpark and
subsequent Westpark amendments. Recreation areas and open spaces within Westpark
residential districts form a hierarchy of parks, pathways, trails, and open spaces, including
pocket parks, a 25-acre Community Park, and appropriate connectivity between open
spaces. Since the number of anticipated single-family housing units within all of the original
Westpark falls within the 3,000-4,999 range, a 25-acre Community Park has been provided
per City requirements. The details outlining the development of the Community Park can be
found in the 2022 CMPA and related Development Agreement.
Pocket parks in the proposed MDR parcels 23, 24 and 25 will be provided as previously
approved in the 2022 CMPA. No additional park space is proposed within these parcels. See
Figure 7, Parks & Open Space Plan for existing approved park and trail and pathway
locations.
Westpark will meet the landscape and open space requirements per Section 5.4.3 of the
Buckeye Development Code and the City of Buckeye’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan
(PRMP). Table 1: Parks Required and Provided for specific park requirements and park
areas previously provided within Westpark.
HDR, and multi-family residential developments which are being incorporated into this CMP,
will provide open space and landscaping per Section 5.4.3 of the Buckeye Development
Code. As these are multi-family developments, landscaping and open space will be calculated
individually and separately from Westpark park requirements. Parks as shown on Table 1:
Parks Required and Provided, will be provided only for Parcels developed with single-family
residential uses. Pocket Parks will not be provided for parcels that are developed with non-
residential uses. Pocket parks will be owned and maintained by the respective Homeowner’s
Associations (HOA). Conceptual Pocket Park amenities and plant types are depicted on
Figure 8, Pocket Park Concepts.
Refer to Figure 7, Parks & Open Space Plan for locations of proposed trails and paths. Due
to the location of the APS substation, associated power easements, with 29 major overhead
power lines and extensive heavy truck traffic combined with high employee traffic occurring
in 3 shifts per day throughout, the Westpark Industrial area is not well suited for any regional
trails. However, the City Staff has shared that the 2025 Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master
Plan show a secondary path running east/west between 269th Ave and Palo Verde Rd north
of the RID canal (“RID Trail”) and additional secondary paths running north/south along Turner
Road and Palo Verde Road alignments (“ROW Trails”). A secondary path is shown along
Turner Road for the north/south length of the Project. As it relates to the RID Trail, the
Primary Trails cross section as identified in the Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan
will be constructed along the canal as each adjacent property develops. The above trail
networks combined with the sidewalks and multiuse trails provide excellent pedestrian
connectivity throughout the industrial park and the region.
10
WESTPARK CMP
TABLE 1: PARKS REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
Access and Circulation
A hierarchy of streets will provide vehicular and pedestrian connectivity throughout and to
the adjacent transportation network. Westpark Loop Road continues its unique design with
its wide, detached, sidewalks on both sides of the vehicular travel lanes; providing safe and
enjoyable passage for pedestrians, hikers, and bikers. The local streets will conform to the
City of Buckeye local street details, and remaining streets will be proposed as shown in
Figure 6A, Street & Circulation Plan and Figures 6B/6C Street Cross Sections.
Modifications to the street sections in this CMP as approved by City Traffic Engineer and City
Engineer can be completed without the need for an amendment to this CMP. Under no
circumstance shall the street cross sections, medians, street lighting, theming and
landscaping requirements be greater than what is required by the City’s current design
standards.
The Westpark circulation plan has been developed using a hierarchy of streets. The streets
will typically be public streets, but collector and local streets may be developed as private
2025 CMP
Parcels (1)
2000 &
2022 CMP
Residential
Parcel/Pod
Community
Park (3)
(ac)
Neigh.
Park (3)
(ac)
Pocket
Parks (3)
(ac)
Total Area (3)
(ac)
Total
Percent
(%)
16
Pod 9
CC (MDR Overlay)
17.4
0.5
0.5
17
Pod 8
CC (MDR Overlay)
27.8
0.5
0.5
18
Pod 1
HDR(4)
16.9
19
Pod 2
HDR(4)
16.1
22
Pod 5
COMMUNITY PARK
-
25.1
25.1
23
18
MDR
32.6
0.5
0.5
24
5
MDR
44.5
0.5
0.5
25
6
MDR
22.2
0.5
0.5
99.3
5.0
25.1
1.5
26.6
27%
144.4
7.2
25.1
2.5
27.6
19%
-
-
Phase 1 Total(5)
290.9
14.5
9.5
9.5
3%
-
-
Phase 2.1 Total(5)
115.5
5.8
1.5
1.5
1%
-
-
Phase 2.2 Total(5)
209.9
10.5
3.0
3.0
1%
616.3
30.8
0.0
14.0
14.0
2%
715.6
35.8
25.1
15.5
40.6
6%
760.7
38.0
25.1
16.5
41.6
5%
(1) 2026 Parcels are depicted in Figure 5, Community Master Plan. As the Project develops, areas may be divided into smaller parcels.
Park Area
Required at
5% (4)(ac)
Residential
Gross Area (2) (4)
(ac)
Land Use Category
Park Area Provided
PARCEL
Total without SF Residential Overlays
Total with SF Residential Overlays
Westpark Total without SF Residential Overlays
Westpark Total with SF Residential Overlays
Not a Part of 2025 CMP Amendment
(2) Acreages are approximate. Subtotals and totals may not exactly add up due to rounding.
(3) Parks will be provided only for Pods, or portions of Pods, developed with residential uses. Parks will not be provided for Pods that are developed with non-
residential. uses.
(4) HDR Parcels shown on Figure 5, Community Master Plan will provide open space an common areas as required in the City of Buckeye Development
Code and are not included in the Park Area required.
(5) Phases 1, 2.1, & 2.2 are not a part of this amendment. They are provided for reference only and show park area for the overall Westpark development.
Calculations are from the City of Buckeye General Plan for Phase 1 and projects for Phases 2.1 & 2.2.
11
WESTPARK CMP
streets as deemed appropriate by the developer. Private or public streets may be used within
any MDR parcel. Private streets may be utilized internally in industrial developments for
safety and security. Private streets will be maintained by an owner or owner’s association.
Private streets and utilities must be designed to minimum City standards for any future
conversation of any private street to a public street.
Gated communities and single-family rental communities are permitted in Westpark
provided they meet the following provisions:
a) An alternative private street section may be considered, subject to the review and
approval of the City of Buckeye.
b) Water, sewer, public utility, refuse collection, and emergency vehicle easements
shall be granted over all private streets, subject to the review and approval of the
City of Buckeye.
c) Gates shall be automated and include emergency access per the City of Buckeye
Fire Department requirements.
Schools
Westpark resides in two different elementary school districts. The area east of SR 85 is within
the Buckeye Elementary School District. Westpark Elementary was constructed in Phase 1.
As previously noted, the school was initially planned for Phase 2 but moved to Phase 1 to
meet the needs of the school district.
The area west of SR 85 is within the Palo Verde Elementary School District. This area is largely
planned for industrial and employment uses with only a few HDR or HDR overlay parcels.
This area is not anticipated to trigger the need for a school site.
The entire Project is located within the Buckeye Union High School District and no high school
is planned within Westpark. Skyview is the nearest public charter high school and is
approximately 1.5 miles southeast of the Project. Youngker is the nearest public high school
and is approximately 1.5 miles east of the Project at 3000 South Apache Road.
The CMPA from primarily residential master planned communities to an industrial focused
master plan is not anticipated to have negative impacts to the respective school districts.
Public Facilities
A water campus adjacent to the Community Park is under design and completion will be
dictated by water needs. Water and the water campus is further discussed in Appendix E,
Water Master Plan. An existing temporary fire station is located in Phase 1. A permanent
fire station site and a Community Park are also included in the eastern section of Westpark
on Warner Street between the east Connector Road and Westpark Loop Road. As previously
mentioned, the fire station site, community park, and water campus site will be dedicated to
the City.
12
WESTPARK CMP
As noted previously, APS will be constructing a 500KV substation, a 230KV substation, a 69KV
substation, and a 12KV substation (“APS Substation”) south of the southwest corner of Lower
Buckey Road and Turner Road. Power to and from the APS Substations will be transmitted
and distributed throughout the site by 7 overhead 500KV power lines, 11 overhead 230KV
power lines, and 11 overhead 69KV lines while the immediate area surrounding the APS
Substations will be distributed by underground power lines from the 12KV substation.
Phasing
As with any large CMP, market economics will have a significant impact on the overall phasing
of the Project. The developer may phase Westpark as deemed appropriate, as long as each
phase is properly engineered with adequate utilities and streets to serve each phase.
Ultimate utility phasing, as discussed in each utility master plan, will be determined with each
site plan and/or preliminary plat submittal. Master planning for engineering will be provided
to ensure well-planned and coordinated development.
It should be noted that while in the initial planning and processing of this CMPA, the
Burlington site is now under development and APS purchased their 120-acre site. New
development and the establishment of critical electrical and transportation related
infrastructure is rapidly changing the dynamic of this area of Westpark.
13
WESTPARK CMP
E. Land Uses and Zoning Districts
Land Uses proposed with this CMP include Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density
Residential (HDR), Regional Commercial (RC), Industrial (I), Business Park (BP), Community
Commercial (CC) and MDR overlay.
The most recent Westpark CMP Amendment completed in 2022 permitted 2,377 single
family dwelling units within Phases 1, 2.1 and 2.2. It is anticipated that the three parcels
included with this CMP that are part of phase 2.2, (identified as parcels 23, 24 and 25 in this
CMP) will include a maximum of 401 dwelling units, maintaining the permitted number of
units. This maximum number of units can be obtained through a traditional subdivision plat
or through a map of dedication allowing multiple units per parcel for the development of a
single-family attached or detached rental development with a minor subdivision plat
containing public rights of way, community parks and tracts and leased premises as all
detailed in the 2006 vested preliminary plats for these parcels. Refer to Table 2: Land Use
Table and Table 3: Permitted Residential Districts for the maximum number of dwelling
units allowed within each Parcel including MDR, MDR Overlay, and HDR. The target density
in a residential Parcel can be achieved by using a combination of lot sizes and housing types.
For the MDR parcels a developer or home builder can elect to provide larger lots or, where
appropriate, smaller lots with more open space.
HDR parcels 18 and 19 are anticipated to reach 30.0 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). Refer to
Table 2: Land Use Table and Table 3: Permitted Residential Districts for proposed land
uses, maximum units and maximum density as represented on Figure 5, Community
Master Plan.
Other uses included in this CMP, Regional Commercial (RC), Industrial (I), Business Park (BP),
Public Facilities, Community Park, and Community Commercial (CC) and related
development standards are detailed in the next section. Table 2: Land Use Table and Table
6: Permitted Non-Residential Districts for proposed districts as represented on Figure 5,
Community Master Plan.
As the Project develops, Parcels may be further subdivided for development as long as the
development standards in this PAD are adhered to.
14
WESTPARK CMP
TABLE 2: LAND USE TABLE
Parcel
2000 &
2022 CMP
Parcels
Primary
Overlay
Gross
Area(2)
(Acres)
Gross
Area
Overlay
Maximum
Density (5)
Max Units
Allowed Per
Parcel (3) (4)
1
-
RC
-
50.0
-
-
-
2
-
BP
-
38.3
-
-
-
3
-
RC
-
20.0
-
-
-
4
-
BP
-
208.3
-
-
-
5
-
BP (6)
-
75.0
-
-
-
6
-
IND
(BP OPTIONAL OVERLAY)
-
550.6
132.9
-
-
6a
-
RC
-
12.6
7
-
IND
-
158.8
-
-
-
8
-
IND
-
54.7
-
-
-
9
-
IND
-
350.7
-
-
-
10
Pod 14
IND
-
79.2
-
-
-
11
-
IND
-
49.4
-
-
-
12
Pods 6 & 7
IND
-
48.3
-
-
-
13
Pod 13
IND
-
30.8
-
-
-
14
Pod 10
IND
-
27.6
-
-
-
15
Pod 11
IND
-
29.6
-
-
-
16
Pod 9
CC
MDR
17.5
17.5
15.0
263
17
Pod 8
CC
MDR
27.8
27.8
15.0
416
18
Pod 1
HDR
-
16.9
-
30.0
508
19
Pod 2
HDR
-
16.1
-
30.0
483
20
Pod 3
Fire Station
-
2.0
-
-
-
21
Pod 4
Water Campus
-
9.1
-
-
-
22
Pod 5
Community Park
-
25.1
-
-
-
23
5
MDR
-
32.6
-
5.0
164
24
6
MDR
-
44.5
-
4.7
153
25
18
MDR
-
22.2
-
2.6
84
TOTAL
1997.6
178.2
1.0
2,071
(6) In addition to BP uses and additional uses as identified under Westpark Business Park , Parcel 5 may be developed with a maximum 1.2 million
square foot use with cross-docks.
(5) Target Density, Target Units and Maximum Units Allowed Per Parcel for Parcels 10 through 25 are consistent with the approved 2000 CMP and
2022 CMP Amendment.
(1) Parcels are depicted in Figure 5, Community Master Plan. As the Project develops, Parcels may be subdivided for development.
(2) Acreages are approximate and are based on a measurement to the centerline of collector and arterial roads. An exception to this is the ROW
surrounding the Community Park and ROW south of Parcel 21. Subtotals and totals may not add up due to rounding.
(3) Total dwelling units for MDR Overlay within Parcels 16 & 17 are calculated assuming the Parcel is developed as residential.
(4) Total single family residential units allowed within 2022 Westpark CMP including all phases without overlay zoning was 2,752. With residential
overlays 3,906 single family units were permitted.
PARCEL
LAND USES
ACREAGE AND DENSITIES
15
WESTPARK CMP
Residential Zoning Districts
Several zoning districts, per the City of Buckeye Development Code, are permitted for each
land use within residential parcels. To provide flexibility and ability to respond to market
demands as Westpark develops and future residential preferences are known.
TABLE 3: PERMITTED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
LAND USE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
MDR
R1-6, R1-3
MDR Overlay
R1-6, R1-3, MF-1
HDR
R1-1, MF-1, MF-2
The residential zoning districts, and MDR Overlay (if developed as residential) shall comply
with the City of Buckeye Development Code Section 2.3, Residential Districts and Article 4.1:
Dimensional Standards, in effect at the time of CMP amendment approval, except as
modified herein. The development standards shown in Table 4: Residential R1-6 and R1-3
Dimensional Standards and Table 5: Residential R1-1, MF-1, and MF-2 Dimensional
Standards.
Residential Districts listed in Table 3 will be identified at the time of Site Plan (MF-1 and MF-
2) or preliminary plat submittal (R1-1, R1-3, R1-6) by the applicant and will be identified on
plans submitted for approval by the City of Buckeye.
16
WESTPARK CMP
TABLE 4: MDR DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
COMPARISON TO BASE ZONING
Conventional
Alternative
-
-
-
-
-
6,000
4,500
3,000
4,000
2,700
55
45
30
40
30
Front-loaded
garage - 20
Side-loaded
garage - 15
Living - 10
Front-loaded
garage - 18 [6]
Side-loaded
garage - 10
Living - 10
8
Front-loaded
garage - 18
[6]
Side-loaded
garage - 10
Living - 10
8
5 w/ 13
aggregate
5 w/ 10-13
aggregate [7]
5
5
0 w/ 10
aggregate
20
20
[8][9]
10
10
[8][9]
10
[8][9]
60
N/A
[10]
70
N/A
[10]
N/A
[10]
35
35
45
30
45
R1-3 Base
Zone
CMP
R1-3
Lot Coverage, maximum (%)
Building Height, maximum (ft.)
(1) Lot width is measured at the front building line.
(2) An additional 5 feet, or an open space tract a minimum of 5' in width, of setback shall be required for all corner lots adjacent to
public right-of-way.
(3) For accessory buildings, a 5' minimum setback.
(4) A maximum 2' projection will be allowed into the setbacks for bay windows, fireplaces, overhangs, etc.
(5) All corners shall have a 33'x33' sight visibility triangle.
(6) A minimum 20' distance is required from back of sidewalk to the face of garage.
(7) SF-6 lots less than 58' in width shall have side yard setbacks that total no less than 10' in width, SF-6 lots 58'-63' in width shall
have side yard setbacks that total 13' in width, and SF-6 lots greater than 63' in width shall have side yard setbacks that total no
(8) Rear yard setback can be reduced to 3' where garage is not accessed from public street but is accessed from an alley,
courtyard, or shared drive.
(9) Patio covers may encroach to within 10' of rear property line.
(10) Maximum lot coverage does not apply and lot coverage will be controlled by the required yard setbacks.
Density, maximum
(du/gross acre)
District
R1-6 Base
Zone
CMP
R1-6 [7]
Setbacks, minimum [4]
Lot Size (sq. ft.)
Lot Width (ft.) [1]
Rear (ft.) [3]
Front (ft.) [5]
Side (ft.) [2][5]
Lot
Dimensions,
minimum
17
WESTPARK CMP
TABLE 4a: MDR OVERLAY DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
COMPARISON TO BASE ZONING
Conventional
Alternative
-
-
-
-
-
15.0
15.0
6,000
4,500
3,000
4,000
2,700
-
-
55
45
30
40
30
-
-
Front-loaded
garage - 20
Side-loaded
garage - 15
Living - 10
Front-loaded
garage - 18 [6]
Side-loaded
garage - 10
Living - 10
8
Front-loaded
garage - 18
[6]
Side-loaded
garage - 10
Living - 10
8
15
15
5 w/ 13
aggregate
5 w/ 10-13
aggregate [7]
5
5
0 w/ 10
aggregate
5
5
20
20
[8][9]
10
10
[8][9]
10
[8][9]
15
[3]
15
[3][11]
60
N/A
[10]
70
N/A
[10]
N/A
[10]
70
70
35
35
45
30
45
50
50
District
R1-6 Base
Zone
CMP
R1-6 [7]
R1-3 Base
Zone
CMP
R1-3
Density, maximum
(du/gross acre)
Lot
Dimensions,
minimum
Lot Size (sq. ft.)
Lot Width (ft.) [1]
Setbacks, minimum [4]
Front (ft.) [5]
Side (ft.) [2][5]
Rear (ft.) [3]
(5) All corners shall have a 33'x33' sight visibility triangle.
(6) A minimum 20' distance is required from back of sidewalk to the face of garage.
(7) SF-6 lots less than 58' in width shall have side yard setbacks that total no less than 10' in width, SF-6 lots 58'-63' in width shall have side
yard setbacks that total 13' in width, and SF-6 lots greater than 63' in width shall have side yard setbacks that total no less than 13' in width.
(8) Rear yard setback can be reduced to 3' where garage is not accessed from public street but is accessed from an alley, courtyard, or shared
drive.
Lot Coverage, maximum (%)
Building Height, maximum (ft.)
MF-1
Base
Zone
CMP
MF-1
(1) Lot width is measured at the front building line.
(2) An additional 5 feet, or an open space tract a minimum of 5' in width, of setback shall be required for all corner lots adjacent to public right-
of-way.
(3) For accessory buildings, a 5-foot minimum setback.
(4) A maximum 2' projection will be allowed into the setbacks for bay windows, fireplaces, overhangs, etc.
(9) Patio covers may encroach to within 10' of rear property line.
(10) Maximum lot coverage does not apply and lot coverage will be controlled by the required yard setbacks.
(11) 25' minmum setback when directly adjacent to single family residential land use. 10' minimum setback when adjacent to open space or
any other land use.
18
WESTPARK CMP
TABLE 5: HDR DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
COMPARISON TO BASE ZONING
-
-
15.0
15.0
No max; 15.1
min
30.0 max ;
6.0 min
1,000
1,000
-
-
-
-
20
20
-
-
-
-
0
0
15
15
[11]
0
15/25
[11]
0 w/ 5 aggregate
0
5
5
0
0/25
[11]
8
[3]
8
[3][7][8]
15
[3]
15
[3][10]
10
[3]
10/25
[3][10]
65
N/A
[9]
70
70
95
95
50
50
50
50
-
50
CMP
MF-1
R1-1 Base
Zone
MF-1 Base
Zone
(11) 25' minimum landscape setback along street frontage.
Lot
Dimensions,
minimum
Lot Size (sq. ft.)
Lot Width (ft.) [1]
Setbacks, minimum [4]
Rear (ft.)
MF-2 Base
Zone
CMP
MF-2
Front (ft.) [5]
Side (ft.) [2][5]
CMP
R1-1
(10) 25' minmum setback when directly adjacent to single family residential land use. 10' minimum setback when adjacent to open space or
any other land use.
(9) Maximum lot coverage does not apply and lot coverage will be controlled by the required yard setbacks.
(8) Patio covers may encroach to within 10' of rear property line.
(7) Rear yard setback can be reduced to 3' where garage is not accessed from public street but from an alley, courtyard, or shared drive.
(6) A minimum 20' distance is required from back of sidewalk to the face of garage.
(5) All corners shall have a 33'x33' sight visibility triangle.
(4) A maximum 2' projection will be allowed into the setbacks for bay windows, fireplaces, overhangs, etc.
(3) For accessory buildings, a 5' minimum setback.
(2) An additional 5 feet, or an open space tract a minimum of 5' in width, of setback shall be required for all corner lots adjacent to public ROW.
(1) Lot width is measured at the front building line.
Lot Coverage, maximum (%)
Building Height, maximum
(ft.)
District
Density, maximum
(du/gross acre)
19
WESTPARK CMP
Residential zoning districts (including overlays if developed as residential) shall comply with
the City of Buckeye Development Code Article 3: Use Regulations, in effect at the time of CMP
amendment approval, except as modified herein. Refer to Appendix A.
The following uses, which differ from or are not mentioned in the Table of Allowed Uses in
Section 3.1, are permitted within Westpark.
•
Public Facilities, electric substations and other similar facilities
•
Build-to-Rent developments (BTR), provided the parcel allows for residential uses
and the development complies with the permitted densities identified within this
CMP.
The following uses, which are allowed per the Table of Allowed Uses in Section 3.1, are not
permitted within Westpark.
•
Dwelling, manufactured. Home; Boarding house/ guest room; Shelter care facility,
homeless; and Cemetery.
•
Dwelling, manufactured. Home and Boarding house/ guest room.
•
Dwelling, manufactured. Home.
•
MF-1: Boarding house; Shelter care facility, homeless; and Cemetery.
Group home and group recovery home are subject to the following:
•
Group homes and/or Group recovery homes shall not be permitted within 800
radial feet (as measured from the closest property lines) of another Group home
or Group recovery home.
20
WESTPARK CMP
Non-Residential Zoning Districts
Commercial, Business Park and Industrial districts bolster the economic base and offer
economic opportunities for the residents of Westpark and the nearby communities. Table
6, Permitted Non-Residential Districts lists the non-residential districts permitted with
each land use category.
TABLE 6: PERMITTED NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
Commercial
Commercial uses shall comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code Section 2.5, Office
and Commercial Districts, Article 3: Use Regulations, Article 4: Dimensional Standards, and
the allowed uses within each Commercial district shall be per Section 3.1, Table of Allowed
Uses in effect at the time of CMP amendment approval, except as modified herein.
The following additional uses are permitted within the Westpark Commercial districts as
described below:
•
Public Facilities, electric substations and other similar facilities are allowed within any
zoning district.
The following Commercial uses listed per non-residential zoning districts are not permitted
within Westpark.
•
C-2:
Cemetery and crematorium or funeral parlor.
•
C-3:
Cemetery, crematorium or funeral parlor, and sexually oriented business
The following use is a conditional use within Westpark.
•
C-2/C-3:
Heliport as an ancillary use to Hospital.
LAND USE
NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
CC (Community Commercial)
C-2
RC (Regional Commercial)
C-3
BP (Business Park)
BP
Industrial
I-1
21
WESTPARK CMP
Business Park
Business Park uses shall comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code Section 2.5,
Office and Commercial Districts, Article 3: Use Regulations, Article 4: Dimensional Standards,
and the allowed uses within each Business Park district shall be per Section 3.1, Table of
Allowed Uses in effect at the time of CMP amendment approval, except as modified herein.
The following additional uses are Permitted Use within the Westpark Business Park district
as described below:
•
Public Facilities, electric substations, electric generation, electric storage and other
similar facilities.
•
Light Manufacturing
•
Data centers
•
Service businesses
•
Small to medium-scale light industrial uses
•
Distribution warehouses allowing single dock configurations and a maximum building
size of 200,000 square feet
•
Battery storage, subject to current Buckeye Development Code requirements
The following Business Park use listed per non-residential zoning districts are not permitted
within Westpark.
•
BP: Cemetery, crematorium or funeral parlor
TABLE 7 ON FOLLOWING PAGE
22
WESTPARK CMP
TABLE 7: BUSINESS PARK DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
COMPARISON TO BASE ZONING
Industrial District
Industrial land uses provide employment opportunities to residents of Westpark and
neighboring communities. There has been a growing and strong interest in providing
industrial uses near the junction of I-10 and SR 85, I-10 and Palo Verde Road and along other
major transportation routes within ease of access to I-10. Refer to Appendix A
The Industrial land use areas are depicted on Figure 5, Community Master Plan. The
comparable zoning district within the City of Buckeye is I-1 Light Industrial, as modified
herein. Dimensional standards are shown in Table 8, Industrial Dimensional Standards.
In the event that industrial and residential parcels are developed within proximity to one
another, mitigation efforts will be taken to buffer the residential land uses directly adjacent
to an industrial use. The interface between these uses are prescribed in Table 4.1.3 and
Article 5 of the City of Buckeye Development Code. Mitigation efforts include:
•
When a right of way does not provide a buffer, incorporating a 75-foot building
setback adjacent to a residential district (this can be on either the industrial district,
-
80
5
N/A
Adjacent to arterial - 30
All others - 15
Adjacent to residential
district - 50
All others - 15
Adjacent to residential
district - 50
All others - 15
50
75
-
200,000
Arterial/Parkway -25
All other lower street
classifications - 15
Arterial/Parkway -25
All other lower street
classifications - 15
Lot Coverage,
maximum (%)
District Size,
minimum (acres)
Building Height,
maximum (ft.)
Setbacks, minimum
Front (ft.)
Side (ft.)
Rear (ft.)
Setback from
peripheral property
line: 25
Adjacent to
residential
district: 50
District
BP
Base Zoning
CMP
BP
Building Size,
maximum (s.f.)
Landscape Setback
(ft.)
23
WESTPARK CMP
the residential district or a combination of both districts).
•
Designing buildings that are generally consistent with the attached Appendix B –
Industrial Building Elevation Examples.
•
When residential uses of 4.5 dwelling units an acre or greater and industrial uses are
located adjacent to one another, a public street or a minimum 50-foot landscape and
parking buffer shall be provided within the setback between the two uses as specified
in Table 8, Industrial Dimensional Standards.
Industrial districts shall comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code Section 2.6,
Industrial Districts, Article 3: Use Regulations, Article 4: Dimensional Standards, Article 5,
Section 9: Industrial Building Standards and Guidelines, and the allowed uses within the I-1
district shall be per Section 3.1, Table of Allowed Uses in effect at the time of CMP
amendment approval, except as modified herein.
In addition to the I-1district uses, the following uses are permitted within the Westpark
Industrial district as described below, all of which must occur within enclosed buildings
unless explicitly stated.
•
Public Facilities and other similar facilities.
•
Service Businesses
•
Any Federally Approved Power Generation Resource(s), subject to a Conditional Use
Permit
•
Storage and Storage Yard – As an accessory use to another allowed use.
•
Research and Development Organizations
The following uses are listed as permitted uses in the Buckeye Development Code as shown
in Appendix A. These uses are anticipated uses within Westpark and are reiterated below.
•
Battery and/or Alternative Electricity Storage
•
Truck Repair & Overhaul
•
Logistics and Distribution Facilities & Centers
•
Warehousing
•
Utility facility, major
•
Any Federally Approved Power Generation Resource(s), subject to a Conditional Use
Permit
•
Wholesale Operations
•
Regional Drainage/Retention
•
Cross-Dock Facilities
24
WESTPARK CMP
TABLE 8: INDUSTRIAL DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS
COMPARISON TO BASE ZONING
-
80
15
15
Adjacent to arterial - 40
All others - 20
Adjacent to arterial - 40
All others - 20
Adjacent to residential
district - 75
Adjacent to rail ROW - 0
All others - 20
Adjacent to residential
district - 50
Adjacent to rail ROW - 0
All others - 20
Adjacent to residential
district - 75
Adjacent to rail ROW - 0
All others - 20
Adjacent to residential
district - 75 (3)
Adjacent to rail ROW - 0
All others - 20
55 at setback; increase
1 ft for every 3 ft in
additional setback to a
max of 120
75 at setback; increase
1 ft for every 3 ft in
additional setback to a
max of 150
Arterial/Parkway -25
All other lower street
classifications - 15
Arterial/Parkway -25
All other lower street
classifications - 15
CMP
I-1(1, 2)
Lot Coverage,
maximum (%)
District Size,
minimum (acres)
Setbacks, minimum
Front (ft.)
Side (ft.)
Rear (ft.)
Landscape Setback
(ft.)
(1) Areas identified as I-1 with BP Limit as shown on Figure 5 of this CMP may
be developed as I-1 with no overlay limitation if developed as part of an
Industrial Mega-site 80 acres or larger.
(2) See Table 7: Business Park Dimensional Standards for any development
within the I-1 with BP Limit area that is not a part of an Industrial Mega-Site.
Building Height,
maximum (ft.)
District
I-1
Base Zoning
25
WESTPARK CMP
F. Development Standards
Article 5, Development and Design Standards and Guidelines of the City of Buckeye
Development Code, in effect at the time of CMP amendment approval, shall govern, except
as modified within this CMP. Following are specific amendments to the Development Code.
Residential Standards (MDR, MDR Overlay & HDR)
Building Standards and Guidelines
Development within Westpark shall comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code
Sections 5.6, Off-Street Parking, 5.7, to the extent applicable, Residential Building Standards
and Guidelines, and 5.8, Commercial Building Standards and Guidelines, in effect at the time
of CMP amendment approval, except as modified herein.
Section “5.7.3.B.3.a – Maximum Garage Width” is amended by deleting the existing section
within the code and replacing it with the following:
1. The maximum width of garage doors on front loaded garages, including the garage door
but excluding any architectural elements on each side of the garage door, shall not exceed
40% of the overall building façade on lots having a typical width greater than 80 feet, 50%
of the overall building façade on lots having typical widths 60 feet and greater but less
than or equal to 80 feet, and 57% of the façade on lots having a typical lot width less than
60 feet.
This maximum garage width shall not apply to any building fronting a street or open space
whose garage orientation is other than the front street, including those that front on an
alley, courtyard or similar shared drive, or detached from the principal building and
located in the rear yard.
2. On homes that incorporate an RV Garage, the maximum aggregate width of the garage
doors attached to the primary residence and facing the front of the lot shall not exceed
55% of the overall building façade. Unless the individual doors are separated by 4 feet,
and one of the garage doors is setback at least 6 feet, in which case the maximum
aggregate width shall not exceed 58% of the overall building façade.
3. The maximum number of homes that incorporate an RV garage within a subdivision shall
not exceed 50%.
Building façade is defined as: Front of home parallel to the street plus the following: Where livable
area or side entry garage is forward of the front facing garage, the length of the wall return from
the forward livable area or side entry garage to the front facing garage shall be added to the
overall façade length. The length of the wall return from the garage to the livable area shall not
be included when the garage is forward of the livable area.
26
WESTPARK CMP
Section “5.7.3.B.1 – Orientation of Dwellings to the Street” is amended by deleting the
existing section within the code and replacing it with the following:
i.
On lots 40 feet or less in width, the home may have a primary doorway entrance not facing
the front lot line provided the entrance is well lit and the entrance is visible from neighboring
units.
ii.
On all lots less than 55 feet in width but greater than 40 feet, each home shall have at least
one primary doorway for access to the dwelling located on the elevation of the dwelling
facing the front lot line of the property, and clearly visible from the street or public area
adjacent to the front lot line.
iii.
On lots 55 feet in width or more, the home may have a primary doorway entrance not facing
the front lot line provided the entrance is well lit and the entrance is visible from neighboring
units.
Section “5.7.3.B.2.a- Architectural Variety” is amended to add the following:
v.
As a standard feature, stone, brick, or accent façade material shall be provided on at least
one elevation for each floor plan.
Section “5.7.6.C – Building and Parking Location, Layout, and Orientation” is amended
by deleting the existing section within the code and replacing it with the following:
2.
When more than one multi-family structure is constructed, except for horizontal single-
family apartments:
a. No side, end, or rear wall of a multi-family structure shall be located within 20 feet of
a side, end, or rear wall of any other multi-family structure:
b. No side, end, or rear wall of a multi-family structure shall be located within 30 feet of
the front wall of any other multi-family structure:
c. No front wall of a multi-family structure shall be located within 40 feet of the front wall
of any other multi-family structure.
Section “5.7.6.D – Building Mass and Articulation” is amended by deleting the existing
section within the code and replacing it with the following:
2. The facades of all multi-family buildings shall be articulated through the incorporation of
at least two or more for horizontal single-family apartments, or three or more for other
multi-family, of the following:
a. Balconies (wrap-around balconies at building corners shall be counted as meeting two
of the required three features);
b. Windows that recess or project at least 18 inches from the face of the adjacent wall;
c. Porches or covered entries;
d. Dormers;
e. At least two distinct variations in materials;
27
WESTPARK CMP
f. Variations in roof forms and/or parapet heights;
g. Architecturally integrated awnings over windows and doorways if not used in a
repeating predictable pattern;
h. Vertical elements that demarcate building modules; and/or
i.
Changes in wall plane six feet or more.
Section “5.7.6.E – Roof Form” is amended by deleting the existing section within the code
and replacing it with the following:
1. Multi-family residential buildings shall be designed to avoid any continuous roofline longer
than 60 feet for horizontal single-family apartments or longer than 50 feet for other multi-
family use. Rooflines longer than 60 feet for horizontal single-family apartment or 50 feet
for other multi-family use, shall include at least one vertical elevation change of at least
two feet. Rooflines longer than 100 feet shall include at least two such changes.
Section “5.7.6.G – Entrances and Porches” is amended by deleting the existing section
within the code and replacing it with the following:
1. At least one main building entry shall face the primary adjacent public street except
for horizontal single-family apartments.
Landscaping
Landscaping will be themed in keeping with the Sonoran Desert setting. Land uses,
roadways, pathways and trails, and landscaping will be designed to create an overall
community character and theme. Landscaping in all residential and commercial uses shall
comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code Section 5.4, in effect at the time of CMP
amendment approval, except as modified herein. Plant material shall follow the ADWR
Approved Plant List.
An enhanced landscape buffer has been established along several of the prominent project
roadways. This buffer, coupled with strategic placement of monument signage, will provide
a marketing opportunity identifying a cohesive master planned development. As depicted
on Figure 9, Landscaping Examples, the following roadways will have a 50’ Enhanced
Landscape Buffer that will include two rows of trees, staggered and planted every 25’ on
center:
•
Palo Verde Road;
•
Lower Buckeye Road between Palo Verde Road and Turner Road; and
•
Wilson Avenue north of Lower Buckeye Road.
The landscape buffer may include driveways, screen walls up to a maximum 3’ 6” in height, berming,
retention basins, utility and signal boxes, guardhouse, and similar elements as approved by the
Zoning Administrator.
28
WESTPARK CMP
Off-Street Parking
Off-Street Parking shall comply with the development standards defined in the City of
Buckeye Development Code Section 5.6, Off-Street Parking, in effect at the time of CMP
amendment approval, except as modified herein.
Section “5.6 – Off-Street Parking Requirements, Table 5.6-1: Off-Street Parking
Schedule A” is amended to add the following sentences:
1) Off-street parking is not required for pocket parks or for neighborhood parks 5 acres or
less in size.
2) A study may be completed in accordance with “5.6.3.C-Schedule C” by the developer or
property owner, when the developer or property owner believes that the use of Schedule A
or Schedule B would result in too much or too little parking based on the intended use of
the development. The study shall be reviewed by the City and approved by the Zoning
Administrator. This applies to all land uses within the Westpark CMP.
Screening
Fences, walls, and screening in all residential and commercial uses shall comply with the City
of Buckeye Development Code Section 5.4.5, Fences, Walls, and Screening, in effect at the
time of CMP amendment approval, except as modified herein.
Section “5.4.6.B.1 – Fences and Walls, Height, Front, Side and Rear” is amended to add
the following:
c. The maximum height of any privacy wall, excluding retaining wall, shall not exceed 7 feet
adjacent to collector streets and 8 feet adjacent to arterial streets. Additional height may
be granted for retaining walls, security walls/fences or sites with elevated foundations or if
additional height is required for the purposes of screening or security, as determined by
the Zoning Administrator or designee.
Lighting
Street lighting shall conform to Section 5.11, Exterior Lighting of the City of Buckeye
Development Code and Section 7.2, Public Street Lights of the City of Buckeye Engineering
Design Standards and Details.
Signage
Signage shall conform to Section 5.12, Signs.
29
WESTPARK CMP
Non-Residential Standards (IND, BP, RC & CC)
Development within Westpark shall comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code
Article 5 Development and Design Standards and Guidelines in effect at the time of CMP
amendment approval, except as Sections are modified herein. Justification for modifications
to all referenced sections are driven by achieving an overall objective of developing a master
planned industrial park in an efficient and cohesive manner that will be geared toward large
scale industrial buildings and occupiers.
Section “5.4 Landscaping”
Landscape design for the overall project will be themed with the Sonoran Desert vernacular
in mind. Site development and associated landscaping will be designed to create an overall
cohesive character and theme for the Industrial Districts. Landscaping in all industrial areas
shall comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code Section 5.4, in effect at the time of
CMP amendment approval, except as modified herein.
Section “5.4.3 Landscape Required” - Table 5.4-1 is amended to read that Industrial
Minimum percentage of parcel to be landscaped is as follows:
Industrial parcels 0.00 – 10.00 acres
10.0%
Industrial parcels 10.01 – 15.00 acres
7.5%
Industrial parcels greater than 15.00 acres
5.0%
It is the intent of master planning the industrial land to achieve a cohesive landscape theme
across industrial developments. Site planning large scale industrial projects typically entail
larger buildings on deeper parcels requiring a higher degree of overall building coverage to
efficiently operate. Adjusting the minimum landscape requirement as parcel sizes increase
is not intended to lessen required landscape buffering but allows flexibility in
accommodating larger buildings without forcing additional landscaping to meet the broad-
based classification assigned within the Buckeye Development Code.
Section “5.4.3.D - Building Foundation Plantings” is amended such that no building
foundation planting will be required for inside screened truck court areas.
Section “5.4.6.C.1.a - Screening Required” is amended such that individual screening of
specialty or oversized rooftop mechanical equipment is not prohibited. Standard sized HVAC
rooftop equipment will require screening via parapet or “penthouse style” grouping in
accordance with the Buckeye Development Code.
Section “5.6 - Off-Street Parking”
Off-Street Parking shall comply with the development standards defined in the City of
Buckeye Development Code Section 5.6, Off-Street Parking, in effect at the time of CMP
amendment approval, except as modified herein.
Table “5.6-2: Off-Street Parking Schedule B” is amended so that uses classified as Indoor
Storage/Warehousing/Vehicle Service/Manufacturing Area shall provide the minimum
30
WESTPARK CMP
number of off-street parking spaces calculated across a building as follows:
•
Buildings up to 50,000 square feet:
Office Areas
1 parking space per 300 square feet of area
Manufacturing Areas
1 parking space per 1,500 square feet of area
Warehousing Areas
1 parking space per 1,250 square feet of area
•
Building between 50,001-200,000 square feet:
Office Areas
1 parking space per 300 square feet of area
Manufacturing Areas
1 parking space per 1,650 square feet of area
Warehousing Areas
1 parking space per 1,750 square feet of area
•
Buildings greater than 200,000 square feet:
Office Areas
1 parking space per 300 square feet of area
Manufacturing Areas
1 parking space per 1,800 square feet of area
Warehousing Areas
1 parking space per 2,000 square feet of area
The industrial development within Westpark is anticipated to be large scale industrial
buildings, data centers, and other unique users with occupants that require a lesser degree
of parking spaces than the broad-based classification assigned within the Buckeye
Development Code. The alternate compliance request (i) is intended to minimize unused
parking fields and heat producing paved areas within a given development and (ii) correlates
with similar recently approved industrial developments within neighboring municipalities,
with examples of industrial uses as shown below. Additional uses not shown below may also
be included in the alternative compliance request for parking reduction.
Recent Representative
Industrial Buildings
Building SF
Required Parking Standard
Dicks Sporting Goods - Goodyear
600,000
1 parking space per 2,400 SF
of overall area
REI - Goodyear
400,000
1 parking space per 2,198 SF
of overall area
5 Below - Buckeye
1,202,964
1 parking space per 2,096 SF
of overall area
Spec Development - VanTrust –
Glendale PAD
542,978
1 parking space per 2,000 SF
of warehouse area
2 Bldg Spec Development –
VanTrust - Phoenix
181,090
1 parking space per 1,000 SF
of warehouse area
Section “5.6.6.A - Off-street Loading Requirements” is amended by adding the following:
“A typical loading dock berth space is considered to meet the requirement of the Off-Street
Loading Requirements.”
31
WESTPARK CMP
Section 5.10 Industrial Building Standards and Guidelines
As approved with the 2022 Westpark CMPA, development within Westpark shall comply with
Industrial Building Standards as defined herein. All industrial buildings that generally follow
the level of architectural detail of the example depicted on Appendix “B” shall be deemed to
be in compliance with Industrial Building Standards and Guidelines as identified below.
Site Design
1. Primary Entrances
Orient buildings so that the principal building entrances are clearly visible from
automobile access points to the site. In cases where the building entrances are not visible
from site access points, these entrances are to be visible from automobiles as they enter
parking fields.
Building Design
1. Theming
Organize the architectural design of buildings around a consistent architectural theme.
Precise replication is not required or desirable. Instead, use similar materials, textures,
and colors, along with repeating patterns and compatible proportions and scale, to
reinforce the connections between the various buildings.
2. Articulation
a. See building elevation examples included in Appendix “B“. Design buildings to reduce
apparent mass by dividing facades into smaller components through the following:
i. Variations in roof form or parapet height of two feet or more;
ii. Incorporation of recessed glass and/or canopies at building entry elements;
iii. Changes in texture, materials, or colors; and
iv. Use of clerestory windows
3. Roof Materials
b. All roofs shall be flat (or appear flat), incorporating a parapet(s) of sufficient height to
screen the roof deck surface from all property lines.
4. Architectural Details, Materials, and Colors
a. The following materials are permitted for use on exterior building walls, individually
or in combination:
i.
Brick, including realistic veneers;
ii.
Stone, including realistic veneers;
iii.
Painted, stained, exposed aggregate, or integrally-colored concrete masonry
units (CMU), split face or ground face;
32
WESTPARK CMP
iv.
Tilt-up concrete panels, painted or textured, with reveals and/or formliner;
v.
Stucco or Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS);
vi.
Clear, tinted, and/or spandrel glass;
vii.
Tile (allowed as an accent only)
viii.
Wood (allowed as an accent only)
ix.
Architectural-grade metal panels (not including paneling used on pre-designed
building kits or pre-manufactured metal buildings);
x.
Metal posts, columns, beams, or similar structural support;
xi.
Scuppers and exterior downspouts may be permitted if they are designed as
architecturally integrated into the building style and serve as a decorative
function; and
xii.
Other materials of comparable quality, durability, and character, as determined
by the Zoning Administrator.
b. Exterior Building and Roof Colors. Select materials and colors that are abundant in
the Sonoran Desert environment.
i.
Reflective building materials (other than windows) and roofing materials,
including materials with high gloss finishes and bright, untarnished copper,
aluminum, galvanized steel, or other metallic surfaces, must be textured or
have a matte or non-reflective surface treatment to reduce the reflection of
sunlight;
ii.
Materials used for exterior surfaces of all structures must blend in color, hue,
and tone with the surrounding natural desert setting to avoid high contrast;
iii.
Excluding shades of white, bright colors (LRV greater than 70) and contrasting
colors are appropriate only for accents, such as on doors, limited trim, and
window mullions. Corporate color and material palettes may be incorporated
into the building design. Fluorescent colors are prohibited, even for use as an
accent; and
iv.
The surface materials of walls, retaining walls, or fences must be similar to and
compatible with those of the adjacent main buildings.
c. Prohibited Wall Materials
i.
Corrugated metal siding as primary wall material;
ii.
Prefabricated metal panels, excluding architectural grade metal panel systems
described above, and any pre-manufactured metal building kits;
iii.
Poor quality veneers and other engineered materials that have an unnatural
appearance not reflective of the product they are attempting to simulate; and
33
WESTPARK CMP
iv.
Mirrored surfaces or any treatments which changes ordinary glass into a
mirrored or highly reflective surface.
34
WESTPARK CMP
G. Project Infrastructure
Master Drainage Plan
The Project is located within the City of Buckeye, Arizona and is currently comprised of
undeveloped desert rangeland and agricultural fields that generally slope from north to
south. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
coverage for the Project is provided on FIRM panels 04013C2095L and 04013C2115L, dated
October 16, 2013. According to these FIRM maps, the Project resides primarily within a flood
Zone X (Shaded) with four isolated AH Zones located along the north side of the Roosevelt
Irrigation District (RID) Canal within the Westpark and SilverRock Communities. FEMA defines
these flood zones as follows:
Zone X (Shaded):
Areas of 0.2% Annual chance flood hazard, areas of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile.
Zone AH:
Areas subject to inundation by the 1% annual chance shallow flooding (usually areas of
ponding) where average depths are between one and three feet. Base Flood Elevations
(BFEs) derived from detailed hydraulic analyses are shown in this zone.
In existing conditions, a majority of the flows approaching from the north are intercepted
and by the Buckeye Flood Retarding Structure (FRS) No.1 and No.2. The Buckeye FRS No.1
and No.2 are two of three retarding structures located along the north side of Interstate 10
(I10) and south of the White Tanks Mountains, which control runoff from the mountains.
These earth-filled dams detain floodwater and convey it via pipe and open floodway to the
Hassayampa River. Together the three structures detain runoff from a 90-square mile area.
These three flood retarding structures are operated and maintained by the Flood Control
District of Maricopa County (FCDMC).
With the aforementioned flood control structures in place, the Project is currently affected
by localized offsite flows produced between the FRS No.1 and FRS No.2 and the Project’s
northern boundary. Interstate 10 (I10) is equipped with culverts allowing runoff generated
south of the FRS No. 1 and No.2 to pass under the I10 and enter the Project site. Upon
entering Project boundaries this runoff continues south within a series of man-made and
natural drainage ways and as sheet flow. More specifically, runoff produced west of Highway
85 enters a series of channels located just south of Lower Buckeye Road that convey the flow
west and then south down the east side of Palo Verde Road or the runoff enters an existing
channel located along the east side of Turner Road, with both channel systems ultimately
35
WESTPARK CMP
outfalling to the Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID) Canal. The remainder of the runoff that
does not enter the aforementioned channels proceeds south as sheet flow and ponds along
the RID Canal ultimately overtopping the northern bank and entering the canal. Runoff
generated east of Highway 85 is captured by a system of existing collector basins located
along the northern boundary of the mass graded Westpark Phase 1. Runoff enters the
existing basins before entering an overflow pipe which outfalls to an earthen channel that is
located along the west side of Westpark Phase 2.3. The earthen channel conveys the flow
south along Westpark Phase 2.3 before it ultimately outfalls to the regional park that is just
north of the RID Canal. The other portion of the flow generated east of Highway 85 is
captured within an existing overflow ditch that conveys the flow southwest towards the
highway. Upon reaching Highway 85, the runoff enters a set of culverts that convey the flow
southwest, under Highway 85 and discharges to a concrete lined channel (ADOT Channel)
along the west side of the highway. The runoff within the ADOT Channel proceeds south,
along the west side of Ogelsby Road and away from the Project.
In proposed conditions, offsite runoff impacting the site is proposed to be captured and
conveyed within a system of proposed and existing channels located within and along
Project boundaries. The proposed channels will capture runoff that impacts the Project’s
northern boundary and either route it directly south towards one of the basins proposed in
the Westpark CLOMR or route it to existing channels that are located along the boundaries
of the Project and within Project boundaries. It is worth noting that Colliers Engineering and
Design has submitted a CLOMR to the City of Buckeye and the Flood Control District of
Maricopa County for the four Zone AH floodplains located along the north side of the RID
Canal. The purpose of the CLOMR is to reduce the extents of the existing Zone AH floodplains
by providing compensatory volume within a series of basins along the north side of the RID
Canal. Developed conditions peak flows leaving the site will not exceed those of the pre-
development condition. No adverse impacts are anticipated to adjacent or downstream
properties as a result of this development.
Onsite drainage flows will be managed by retention basins designed to accommodate the
100-year, 2-hour storm runoff volume produced by their respective tributary drainage areas.
The precise geometry and location of the retention basins will be refined and adapted as the
development process proceeds. Retention basins within the development will be dewatered
in 36 hours or less. The dewatering of the basin will be accomplished via the use of drywells
and natural infiltration. As the development process proceeds, more detailed drainage
design and documentation will be prepared in support of future site plan improvement plan
submittals for the Project.
Appendix D, Drainage Master Plan is provided under separate cover.
Water Master Plan
The Project is located roughly 0.5 miles south of the intersection of Interstate 10 and SR-85
in Buckeye, Arizona, and within the City of Buckeye (COB) Pressure Zone 2 as shown in the
COB Water Infrastructure Master Plan and will be served by the COB. Well locations within
36
WESTPARK CMP
the site have been identified as potential sources of supply for the project and will supply
raw water to the existing Water Supply Facility 2 (WSF-2) east of SR-85 for treatment and
distribution. The WSF-2 will provide storage and booster pumping for the entire Project.
Existing infrastructure in the surrounding area consists of 8-inch and 16-inch water lines
within Westpark Loop and the neighboring Westpark Phase 2.1 and 2.2 developments, as
well as an existing 20-inch raw water supply line underneath SR-85 that runs west to Turner
Road and transitions to a 24-inch line that runs south towards the Roosevelt Irrigation
District (RID) Canal. The proposed water infrastructure for serving the Project includes
domestic wells, water transmission lines, centralized water treatment (if required based on
groundwater quality), storage, and booster pumping at the existing WSF-2, and distribution
water mains within Westpark Phase 3. Water mains to serve the Project range in size from 8-
inch to 24-inch. Refer to Appendix E, Water Master Plan which is provided under separate
cover.
Wastewater Master Plan
The Project is located roughly 0.5 miles south of the intersection of Interstate 10 and SR-85
in Buckeye, Arizona, and within collection basin 1 and 4 of the City of Buckeye (COB)
Wastewater Infrastructure Master Plan. There is currently existing wastewater infrastructure
just west of SR-85, and east of SR-85 within Westpark Phases 1, 2.1 and 2.2. Portions of the
proposed wastewater infrastructure within collection basin 4 will be routed east across SR-
85 to existing infrastructure within collection basin 1, while the remainder of the proposed
infrastructure within collection basin 4 will be routed to a sewer trunk line within Wilson
Avenue and temporarily outfall to a packaged wastewater treatment plant located south of
the site along the Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID) Canal.
Ultimately, the packaged wastewater treatment plant will be replaced with a lift station to
pump wastewater flows to either the planned Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) 4 or the WRF
5, as shown in the COB Wastewater Infrastructure Master Plan. The wastewater
infrastructure for the Project will be owned and operated by the COB. The Project area slopes
generally to the south/southwest and is capable of being served by gravity sewer. The
collection system layout has been designed based on existing topography at the Site and will
be refined as each individual parcel develops. The proposed sewer mains range in depth
from 9-feet to 30-feet. Sewer mains to serve the Project range in size from 8-inch to 24-inch.
Each sewer alignment was analyzed to minimize the pipe depth wherever possible, and
depths are anticipated to be refined as the final site grading is completed. Refer to Appendix
F, Wastewater Master Plan which is provided under separate cover.
Traffic Impact Analysis
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) utilized within the Master Traffic Impact Analysis will not limit or guide
the square footage developed on the project site. At the time of site plan review, a Traffic
Impact Analysis (or Traffic Statement, if applicable) will be provided for City review and
administrative approval. Dedication of additional right-of-way and/or construction of
37
WESTPARK CMP
additional street improvements beyond those improvements identified in this CMP may be
required based upon the findings of the Traffic Statement or updated TIA.
A Master Traffic Impact Analysis for the overall Westpark development is provided under a
separate cover.
WESTPARK CMP
Figures
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix A
CITY OF BUCKEYE
TABLE OF ALLOWED USES*
*Residential districts (including overlays if developed as residential) shall comply with the City of
Buckeye Development Code Article 3: Use Regulations, in effect at the time of CMP amendment
approval, except as modified within the CMP amendment.
*Commercial districts shall comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code Article 3: Use
Regulations, and the allowed uses within each Commercial district shall be per Section 3.1, Table of
Allowed Uses in effect at the time of CMP amendment approval, except as modified within the CMP
amendment.
*Business Park districts shall comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code Article 3: Use
Regulations and the allowed uses within each Business Park district shall be per Section 3.1, Table of
Allowed Uses in effect at the time of CMP amendment approval, except as modified within the CMP
amendment.
*Industrial districts shall comply with the City of Buckeye Development Code Article 3: Use Regulations
and the allowed uses within the I-1 district shall be per Section 3.1, Table of Allowed Uses in effect at
the time of CMP amendment approval, except as modified within the CMP amendment.
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 4 of 73
3.1.5. Table of Allowed Uses.
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
RESIDENTIAL USES
Household
Living
Accessory
Dwelling Unit
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.3.4.A
Bungalow
community
P
Dwelling,
duplex
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.1.E
Dwelling,
fourplex
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.1.E
Dwelling,
live/work
P
5.13.4.J.3
Dwelling,
mfd. home
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.1.B
Dwelling,
mobile home
P
3.2.1.C
Dwelling,
multi-family
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Dwelling,
single-family
attached
P
P
P
P
P
Dwelling,
single-family
detached
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
Dwelling,
townhome
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.1.E
Dwelling,
triplex
P
P
P
P
3.2.1.E
Dwelling,
zero lot line
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.1.G
Mfd.
home/mobile
P
3.2.1.D
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 5 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
home
subdivision
Mobile home
park
P
3.2.1.F
Group
Living
Refer to
Section 3.5
for buffering
distances if
applicable
Assisted
living,
commercial
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Assisted
living,
residential
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
C
C
C
C
Boarding
house/guest
room
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
Group home
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Group
recovery
home
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Nursing
home
C
C
C
C
C
C
P
P
P
Shelter care
facility
P
P
P
P
C
C
C
C
P
P
P
Shelter care
facility,
homeless
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
P
PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL USES
Community
Service
Cemetery
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
P
P
3.2.2.B
Crematorium
or funeral
parlor
P
P
C
P
P
Government
admin. and
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 6 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
civic
buildings
Government
maintenance
and
operations
yards/
buildings
C
C
P
P
P
Public safety
facility
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Social
service
facility
C
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Child Care
Facility
Day care,
commercial
C
C
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
Day care,
residential
P
P
P
C
C
C
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
Health Care
Facility
Hospital
C
C
C
C
C
C
P
P
P
Medical
office or
clinic
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Wireless
Facilities
Alternative
tower
structure
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.2.D
Amateur
radio
antennae
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.2.D
Amateur
radio
antennae
greater than
35 feet in
height
C
C
C
C
C
C
3.2.2.D
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 7 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
Broadcasting
or recording
studio (no
tower)
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.2.D
Cell on
wheels
(COW)
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.2.D
Satellite
earth station
C
P
P
P
P
3.2.2.D
Tower
(including
any facility
with a tower)
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.2.D
Wireless
facility not
defined in
this Article
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
3.2.2.D
Transporta-
tion Facility
Airport
C
C
C
C
Bus terminal
P
C
C
P
P
P
P
Heliport
C
C
C
C
C
C
P
P
P
C
Utility
Battery
Energy
Storage
System
(BESS)
C
C
P
P
3.2.2.A
Solar
generation
station
P
P
C
P
P
3.2.2.C
Utility
facility,
major
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
P
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 8 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
Utility
facility,
minor
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
RECREATION, EDUCATION, AND ASSEMBLY USES
Assembly
Assembly
hall, private
C
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.3.B
Assembly
hall, public
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
3.2.3.B
Auditorium,
private
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
3.2.3.B
Community
recreation
center
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
Country club,
private
membership
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.3.B
Event venue
C
C
C
P
C
P
P
P
3.2.3.B
Fraternal or
social club,
nonprofit
C
C
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.3.B
Religious
Assembly
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.3.B
Cultural
Facility
Art gallery
or museum,
public
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
Library,
public
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Education
Private
college or
university
C
C
P
P
P
C
C
P
P
Private
elementary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
C
C
C
C
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 9 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
or middle
school
Private high
school
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
C
C
C
P
Parks and
Open Space
Arboretum
or botanical
garden
P
C
C
C
C
P
P
C
P
P
P
C
P
P
3.2.3.A
Campground
P
C
C
Community
playfields
and parks
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Parks and
nature
preserves,
not-for-profit
P
P
P
Recreation
and
Entertain-
ment,
Outdoor
General
outdoor
recreation,
commercial
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
Golf course,
unlighted
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
Golf course/
driving
range,
lighted
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
Major enter-
tainment
facility,
outdoor
C
C
P
C
C
P
P
C
Race track
(auto, dog,
and horse)
C
C
C
C
C
C
RV
campground
P
P
3.2.4.F
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 10 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
RV park
P
P
3.2.4.G
Shooting
range,
outdoor
C
C
Zoo
C
C
C
C
Recreation
and
Entertainme
nt, Indoor
Art gallery
or museum,
private
C
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
C
Fitness and
recreational
sports center
C
C
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
General
indoor
recreation,
commercial
C
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
Major enter-
tainment
facility,
indoor
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
Movie
theater
C
P
P
P
P
P
C
COMMERCIAL USES
Agriculture
and
Ranching
Agriculture
P
P
3.2.4.A
Commercial
ranch
P
P
3.2.4.A
Dairy
P
C
P
3.2.4.A
Meat
processing
P
3.2.4.A
Residential
ranch
P
P
3.2.4.A
Animal
hospital
P
C
P
C
C
P
P
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 11 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
Animal
Sales and
Services
Animal pet
shop, retail
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
Animal
training
school
P
P
C
C
P
C
P
P
P
Kennel,
indoor only
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
Kennel,
indoor/
outdoor
P
P
C
C
Veterinary
clinic
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Financial
Service
Financial
institution,
with drive-
through
C
P
P
P
P
Financial
institution,
without
drive-
through
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Nontradition
al financial
institutions
C
C
C
C
C
P
3.2.4.E
Food and
Beverage
Service
Bar, lounge,
or tavern
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
Catering
service
P
C
Drive-in
restaurant
C
P
P
P
Farmers
market
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 12 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
Food sales,
wholesale
P
P
P
Food Truck
Court
(Mobile food
vendor)
C
C
Nightclub
C
C
C
P
P
P
P
Restaurant,
with drive-
through
P
P
P
P
Restaurant,
without
drive-
through
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Office
Data Center
C
C
C
C
C
Office,
business or
professional
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Research
laboratory
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
P
Personal
Services
Dry cleaning
and laundry
processing
P
P
P
General
personal
services
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Instructional
services or
trade school
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Retail
(Sales)
Alcoholic
beverages,
retail sale
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 13 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
Building
materials
sales, indoor
retail
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.4.B
Convenience
store with
gas sales
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
C
Feed store
P
C
C
P
P
General
retail
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.4.C
Large format
retail
P
P
P
C
3.2.4.D
Nursery and
plant sales,
wholesale
P
P
P
C
P
P
Open-air
market or
flea market
P
P
C
C
C
Plant sales,
retail
P
P
P
P
C
P
P
P
Sexually
oriented
business
C
C
C
C
3.2.4.H
Tobacco-
Oriented
Retailer
C
P
P
C
C
P
P
3.2.4.I
Visitor
Accommoda
tions
Bed and
breakfast
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
P
P
P
C
C
P
P
Hotel or
motel
C
P
P
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
Resort
C
P
P
P
P
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 14 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
MARIJUANA USES
Marijuana
Sales and
Cultivation
Dual License
Marijuana
Establishment
C
3.2.5.A.3
Medical
Marijuana
Dispensary
C
3.2.5.A.1
Medical
Marijuana
Dispensary,
Offsite
Cultivation
Location
C
3.2.5.A.2
VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICES USES
Vehicles
and
Equipment
Boat, RV
sales and
rental
P
P
P
3.2.6.B
Car wash
P
P
P
P
3.2.6.A
Gasoline
sales
C
C
P
P
C
P
3.2.6.B
Parking
structure
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.6.B
Truck repair
and overhaul
C
C
C
P
3.2.6.B
Truck stop
C
C
P
3.2.6.C
Vehicle sales
and rental
P
P
P
P
P
C
3.2.6.B
Vehicle
service and
repair, major
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.6.B
Vehicle
service and
repair, minor
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.6.B
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 15 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
Vehicle and
boat storage
P
P
P
P
3.2.6.B
INDUSTRIAL USES
Industrial
Service
Building
material
sales,
outdoor or
wholesale
P
P
P
P
Drilling
company, no
outside
storage
P
P
P
Drilling
company,
with outside
storage
P
Equipment
Rental Yard
C
C
C
P
P
Equipment
Rental Yard,
Heavy
C
P
P
General
industrial
service
P
P
P
3.2.7.C
Resource
extraction
C
C
Manufacturi
ng and
Production
Assembly,
Light
P
P
P
P
Batch Plant,
Permanent
P
3.2.7.A
Maker
Space, up to
a maximum
P
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 16 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
of 30,000
square feet
Mfg., heavy
P
Mfg., light
P
P
P
P
Warehouse
and Freight
Movement
Distribution
Warehouse
P
P
P
P
3.2.7.B
Mini-storage,
indoor
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.2.7.E
Mini-storage,
outdoor
P
C
P
P
3.2.7.E
Motor freight
terminal
C
C
P
Office
warehouse
P
P
P
P
Storage
yard
C
C
P
Warehouse
P
C
P
P
Wholesale
establishment
P
C
C
P
P
P
Waste and
Salvage
Auto
wrecking
and salvage
yard
C
Landfill
C
3.2.7.D
Recycling
center indoor
C
C
P
P
Recycling
center
outdoor
P
TEMPORARY USES
Temporary
Uses
Antennas,
temporary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.A
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 17 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
Batch plant,
temporary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.B
Expansion or
replacement
facilities,
temporary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.C
Food Trucks;
Mobile Food
Vendor
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.D
Hot air
balloons
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.E
Office
space/
equipment
storage,
temporary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Other
temporary
uses
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.L
Portable
restroom,
temporary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.F
Portable
storage
container,
temporary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.G
Retail sales,
temporary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.H
Roadside
stand
P
P
3.4.2.I
Sales/leasin
g office,
temporary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.J
Created: 2024-07-26 11:50:35 [EST]
(Supp. No. 20, Update 2)
Page 18 of 73
Table 3.1-1: TABLE OF ALLOWED USES
P=Permitted C=Conditional Use Blank cell = Use is prohibited
Use
Category
Use Type
RESIDENTIAL
MIXED-USE
NONRESIDENTIAL
AG
R1-43
R1-18
R1-10
R1-6
R1-3
R1-1
MF- 1
MF- 2
MH
NMU
CMU
RMU
IMU
DC
DR
PO
C- 1
C-2
C-3
BP
I -1
I -2
Use
Standards
Yard sale,
temporary
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
3.4.2.K
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix B
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ELEVATION EXAMPLES
123456
Signage
123456
Signage
Westpark Conceptual Elevations
5.16.22
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix C
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND EXHIBIT
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 1 of 13
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A parcel of land situate within Sections 15, 21, 22, 23, and 27, Township 1
North, Range 4 West of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County,
Arizona, more particularly described as follows:
PARCEL NO 1:
BEGINNING at the West Quarter Corner of said Section 21, monumented by a
PK Nail with tag RLS 36888;
Thence North 00°10'11" East along the westerly line of the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 21, a distance of 2613.04 feet as the Basis of Bearings to the
Northwest Corner of said Section 21, monumented by a rebar no ID;
Thence South 89°37'12" East along the northerly line of said Northwest
Quarter, 2621.85 feet to the North Quarter Corner of said Section 21;
Thence South 89°37'12" East along the northerly line of the Northeast Quarter
of said Section 21, a distance of 2621.85 feet to the Northeast Corner of said
Section 21, monumented by a ¾” rebar with no ID;
Thence North 00°44'55" East along the westerly line of the Southwest Quarter
of said Section 15, a distance of 2621.90 feet to the West Quarter corner of
said Section 15, monumented by 1” iron pipe with cap, RLS 31034;
Thence North 00°24'07" East along the westerly line of the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 15, a distance of 1270.21 feet to the northerly line of the South
Half of said Northwest Quarter;
Thence North 89°22'06" East along said northerly line, 2608.03 feet to the
easterly line of said Northwest Quarter;
Thence South 00°28'21" West along said easterly line, 1270.24 feet to the
Center of said Section 15 monumented by Maricopa County aluminum cap
with RLS 33307, dated 2009;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 2 of 13
Thence North 89°22'06" East along the northerly line of the Southeast Quarter
of said Section 15, a distance of 2624.18 feet to the East Quarter Corner of said
Section 15, monumented by a ¾” rebar in concrete;
Thence South 00°06'39" West along the easterly line of said Southeast
Quarter, 2624.67 feet to the Southeast Corner of said Section 15 monumented
by a rebar with tag RLS 38862;
Thence South 89°23'59" East along the northerly line of the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 23, a distance of 1310.72 feet;
Thence leaving said northerly line, South 00°00'51" West, 2305.24 feet;
Thence South 89°02'30" East, 1312.37 feet;
Thence North 63°47'30" East, 1456.02 feet;
Thence North 70°36'40" East, 960.03 feet to the easterly line of State Route 85;
Thence along said easterly line of State Route 85 the following 4 courses:
Thence South 00°15'19" East, 1050.92 feet;
Thence South 00°13'20" West, 600.03 feet;
Thence South 04°58'56" West, 1205.02 feet;
Thence South 07°59'42" West, 84.59 feet to the northerly line of the Roosevelt
Irrigation District Canal;
Thence along said northerly line the following 15 courses;
Thence South 64°41'40" West, 2111.44 feet to the beginning of a tangent
curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 1460.00 feet;
Thence southwesterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
13°22'43", an arc length of 340.91 feet to a point of tangency;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 3 of 13
Thence South 78°04'23" West, 2285.37 feet to the beginning of a tangent
curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 4675.00 feet;
Thence southwesterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
03°11'49", an arc length of 260.86 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence North 00°08'12" West, 9.18 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent
curve, concave northerly, whose radius point bears North 08°26'35" West,
3550.00 feet;
Thence westerly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
02°21'50", an arc length of 146.46 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence South 83°55'14" West, 991.14 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave northerly, having a radius of 1650.00 feet;
Thence southerly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
14°48'17", an arc length of 426.35 feet to a point of tangency also being
referred hereon as Point "B";
Thence North 81°16'29" West, 3683.66 feet;
Thence North 81°16'29" West, 836.27 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave northeasterly, having a radius of 1600.00 feet;
Thence northwesterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
02°09'43", an arc length of 60.37 feet to the beginning of a tangent compound
curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 1600.00 feet;
Thence northwesterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
09°33'22", an arc length of 266.86 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence North 69°33'24" West, 655.58 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave northeasterly, having a radius of 3050.00 feet;
Thence northwesterly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of
05°55'43", an arc length of 315.60 feet to a point of tangency;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 4 of 13
Thence North 75°29'07" West, 3363.88 feet to the westerly line of the
Southwest Quarter of said Section 21;
Thence North 00°10'30" East along said westerly line, 1381.34 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT FROM PARCEL NO. 1:
A parcel of land situate within the East half of Section 22, Township 1 North,
Range 4 West of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona,
more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the East Quarter corner of said Section 22, monumented by an
aluminum cap with RLS 31034;
Thence South 00°03'31" West along the easterly line of the Southwest Quarter
of said Section 22, a distance of 328.17 feet;
Thence leaving said easterly line, South 89°31'30" West, 2614.49 feet to the
westerly line of said East Half;
Thence North 00°06'24" West along said westerly line, 2044.03 feet;
Thence leaving said westerly line, North 89°31'30" East, 2620.21 feet to the
easterly line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22;
Thence South 00°03'10" West along said easterly line, 1715.90 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALSO EXCEPT FROM PARCEL NO. 1:
A parcel of land situate within Sections 22, 23, 26, and 27, Township 1 North,
Range 4 West of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona,
more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the aforementioned said Point “B”;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 5 of 13
Thence South 78°04'23" West along the northerly line of the Roosevelt
Irrigation District Canal, 2285.37 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave northwesterly, having a radius of 4675.00 feet;
Thence southwesterly along said northerly line of the Roosevelt Irrigation
District Canal and curve to the right, through a central angle of 03°04'23", an
arc length of 250.74 feet to a point of non-tangency;
Thence North 00°08'12" West, 14.67 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave westerly, having a radius of 1740.00 feet;
Thence northerly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of
05°40'53", an arc length of 172.53 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence North 05°49'04" West, 518.24 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave easterly, having a radius of 1860.00 feet;
Thence northerly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
05°52'36", an arc length of 190.77 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence North 00°03'31" East, 1245.96 feet;
Thence North 89°56'29" West, 6.00 feet;
Thence North 00°03'31" East, 542.00 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 126.00 feet;
Thence South 44°56'29" East, 63.64 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 377.00 feet;
Thence South 00°03'31" West, 10.00 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 769.62 feet;
Thence North 45°03'31" East, 50.91 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 67.80 feet;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 6 of 13
Thence South 44°56'29" East, 36.77 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 278.00 feet;
Thence South 00°03'31" West, 6.00 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 252.20 feet;
Thence North 45°03'31" East, 50.91 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 83.80 feet;
Thence South 44°56'29" East, 42.43 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 492.58 feet;
Thence South 00°03'31" West, 10.00 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 729.97 feet;
Thence North 00°03'31" East, 6.00 feet;
Thence South 89°56'29" East, 502.83 feet;
Thence North 44°47'44" East, 63.35 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent
curve, concave easterly, whose radius point bears North 89°45'35" East,
5670.00 feet;
Thence northerly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
03°19'13", an arc length of 328.58 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence South 86°55'12" East, 15.00 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent
curve, concave easterly, whose radius point bears South 86°55'12" East,
5655.00 feet;
Thence northerly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
00°12'58", an arc length of 21.33 feet to a point of non-tangency;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 7 of 13
Thence South 86°42'14" East, 126.00 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent
curve, concave easterly, whose radius point bears South 86°42'14" East,
5529.00 feet;
Thence northerly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of
03°50'34", an arc length of 370.83 feet to a point of non-tangency;
Thence South 45°38'05" East, 58.11 feet;
Thence South 01°18'19" East, 63.28 feet;
Thence South 43°08'17" West, 41.07 feet;
Thence South 01°51'43" East, 322.17 feet;
Thence South 88°08'17" West, 12.00 feet;
Thence South 01°51'43" East, 48.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave westerly, having a radius of 1871.00 feet;
Thence southerly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
03°21'03", an arc length of 109.42 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence South 01°29'20" West, 859.75 feet to the northerly line of the
Roosevelt Irrigation District Canal;
Thence South 64°41'40" West along said northerly line of the Roosevelt
Irrigation District Canal, 1273.49 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave northwesterly, having a radius of 1460.00 feet;
Thence southwesterly along said northerly line of the Roosevelt Irrigation
District Canal and curve to the right, through a central angle of 13°22'43", an
arc length of 340.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described Parcel No. 1 contains an area of 75,547,908 square feet
or 1734.3413 acres more or less and being subject to any easements,
restrictions, rights-of-way of record or otherwise.
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 8 of 13
PARCEL NO. 2:
A parcel of land situate within Section 24, Township 1 North, Range 4 West of
the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, more particularly
described as follows:
COMMENCING at the West Quarter Corner of said Section 24, monumented
by a ADOT brass cap in hand hole with RLS 38862, dated 2010 from which the
Northwest Corner of said Section 24, monumented by an ADOT brass cap in
hand hole bears as the Basis of Bearings, North 00°06’26” West, 2662.93 feet;
Thence South 89°23’26” East, 54.82 feet to the easterly line of State Route 85
being the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence North 00°06'26" West along said easterly line, 1331.34 feet;
Thence South 89°15'48" East, 1285.16 feet to the westerly line of the Final Plat
of “Westpark Phase 2.2 Parcel 8” recorded at Book 1825, Page 50, Maricopa
County Recorders Office, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence South 23°19'09" East along said westerly line, 721.49 feet to the
northerly right of way line of Warner Road recorded at Book 750, Page 28,
Maricopa County Recorders Office, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence South 66°15'05" West along said northerly right of way line, 39.12 feet
to the westerly line said Warner Road ;
Thence South 23°23'43" East along said westerly line, 110.00 feet to the
southerly line said Warner Road;
Thence along said southerly line the following 6 courses:
Thence North 66°36'17" East, 444.39 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave southeasterly, having a radius of 570.00 feet;
Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
13°32'15", an arc length of 134.68 feet to a point of tangency;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 9 of 13
Thence North 80°08'32" East, 143.14 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave northwesterly, having a radius of 570.00 feet;
Thence northeasterly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of
19°20'45", an arc length of 192.46 feet to the beginning of a reverse tangent
curve, concave southerly, having a radius of 200.00 feet;
Thence easterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
63°16'34", an arc length of 220.87 feet to the beginning of a reverse non-
tangent
curve,
concave
northeasterly,
whose
radius
point
bears
North 35°35'06" East, 650.93 feet;
Thence southeasterly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of
32°43'54", an arc length of 371.86 feet to a point of non-tangency;
Thence South 01°22'33" West, 132.58 feet;
Thence South 10°00'27" East, 715.70 feet to the northerly line of the Roosevelt
Irrigation District Canal;
Thence South 79°59'33" West along said northerly line, 740.22 feet to the
beginning of a tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of
1590.00 feet;
Thence southwesterly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of
15°17'53", an arc length of 424.53 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence South 64°41'40" West continuing along said northerly line, 2169.52
feet to the easterly line of said State Route 85;
Thence North 00°46'31" West along said easterly line, 1312.52 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described Parcel No. 2 contains an area of 4,990,192 square feet or
114.5590 acres more or less and being subject to any easements, restrictions,
rights-of-way of record or otherwise.
PARCEL NO. 3:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 10 of 13
A parcel of land situate within Sections 24 and 13, Township 1 North, Range 4
West of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, more
particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at the Southeast Corner of said Section 13, monumented by
rebar with no ID, from which the East Quarter Corner of said Section 13,
monumented by a 3” aluminum cap, bears as the Basis of Bearings North
00°08’03” East, 2640.62 feet;
Thence North 00°08’03” East along the easterly line of the Southeast Quarter
of said Section 13, a distance of 1320.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence leaving said easterly line, South 89°39'35" East, 83.54 feet;
Thence South 00°01'20" East, 1264.03 feet;
Thence South 00°01'21" East, 828.50 feet to the northerly line of the Final Re-
plat of Westpark Parcel 18S recorded at Book 1700, Page 45, Maricopa County
Recorders Office, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence along said northerly line the following 11 courses:
Thence South 89°59'43" West, 460.05 feet;
Thence North 88°25'57" West, 56.41 feet;
Thence North 83°03'53" West, 56.29 feet;
Thence North 77°30'22" West, 56.27 feet;
Thence North 72°52'08" West, 828.41 feet;
Thence North 12°47'56" West, 46.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave easterly, having a radius of 180.00 feet;
Thence northerly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
18°46'26", an arc length of 58.98 feet to a point of non-tangency;
Thence North 81°24'32" West, 40.03 feet;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 11 of 13
Thence North 83°32'55" West, 12.28 feet;
Thence South 88°24'31" West, 110.00 feet;
Thence North 89°18'27" West, 138.12 feet to the easterly line of the Final Plat
of Westpark Phase 2.2 Parcel 19 recorded at Book 1025, Page 41, Maricopa
County Recorders Office, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence along said easterly line the following 14 courses;
Thence North 00°53'57" East, 52.97 feet;
Thence North 60°27'39" West, 41.38 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave northeasterly, having a radius of 50.00 feet;
Thence northwesterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
78°53'05", an arc length of 68.84 feet to the beginning of a tangent reverse
curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 20.00 feet;
Thence northeasterly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of
30°15'08", an arc length of 10.56 feet to a point of non-tangency;
Thence South 84°11'47" East, 113.14 feet;
Thence North 05°48'13" East, 149.00 feet;
Thence North 00°00'00" East, 140.85 feet;
Thence North 00°00'00" East, 91.74 feet;
Thence North 04°18'59" East, 53.15 feet;
Thence North 00°00'00" East, 53.00 feet;
Thence North 90°00'00" West, 113.95 feet;
Thence North 06°01'38" East, 47.10 feet;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 12 of 13
Thence North 00°00'00" East, 50.00 feet;
Thence North 46°32'31" East, 43.83 feet;
Thence leaving said easterly line, North 03°25'33" East, 80.00 feet to the
beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave southwesterly, whose radius point
bears South 03°25'33" West, 2040.00 feet being the northerly right of way line
of the Westpark Loop North recorded at Book 750, Page 28, Maricopa County
Recorders Office, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence northwesterly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of
02°45'29", an arc length of 98.20 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence continuing along said northerly right of way line,
North 89°19'55" West, 517.37 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave southeasterly, having a radius of 740.00 feet;
Thence southwesterly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of
31°00'09", an arc length of 400.41 feet to a point of non-tangency being the
easterly line of the Final Plat of Westpark Phase 2.2 Parcel 7N recorded at Book
1825, Page 38, Maricopa County Recorders Office, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence along said easterly line the following 8 courses:
Thence North 19°00'32" East, 139.06 feet;
Thence North 39°49'09" East, 45.62 feet;
Thence North 34°35'28" West, 116.03 feet;
Thence North 32°24'56" East, 12.26 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent
curve, concave southeasterly, whose radius point bears South 39°08'57" East,
188.22 feet;
Thence northeasterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of
10°16'18", an arc length of 33.74 feet to a point of non-tangency;
Thence North 22°02'47" West, 155.00 feet;
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-LEGAL.docx
Page 13 of 13
Thence South 67°10'48" West, 28.42 feet;
Thence North 00°11'27" East, 105.08 feet to the North-South Mid-Section line
of said Section 13;
Thence North 00°12'11" East along said North-South Mid-Section line, 493.52
feet;
Thence leaving said North-South Mid-Section line, South 89°12'09" East,
2683.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described Parcel No. 3 contains an area of 4,325,734 square feet or
99.3052 acres more or less and being subject to any easements, restrictions,
rights-of-way of record or otherwise.
Parcels 1, 2, and 3 combined contains an area of 84,863,834 square feet or
1948.2056 acres.
The description shown hereon is not to be used to violate any subdivision
regulation of the state, county and/or municipality or any land division
restrictions.
Prepared by: Colliers Engineering and Design
4742 North 24th Street, Suite 270
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Project No. 1386
Date June 2025
2/13/2026
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:07
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
SHEET INDEX MAP
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 2500'
JK
DMS
PARCEL NO. 1
PARCEL NO. 2
PARCEL NO. 3
SHEET 1
SHEET 3
SHEET 2
SHEET 4
SHEET 5
SHEET 6
APS
PALO VERDE ROAD
LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION
DISTRICT CANAL
WILSON AVENUE
STATE ROUTE 85
BROADWAY ROAD
BURLINGTON
SHEET 7
PARCEL NO. 1 AREA 75,547,908 SQ FT OR 1734.3413 ACRES
PARCEL NO. 2 AREA 4,990,192 SQ FT OR 114.5590 ACRES
PARCEL NO. 3 AREA 4,325,734 SQ FT OR 99.3052 ACRES
COMBINED AREA 84,863,834 SQ FT OR 1948.2056 ACRES
2/13/2026
R=3050.00'
D=5°55'43"
L=315.60'
PARCEL NO. 1
N81°16'29"W
836.27'
R=1600.00'
D=2°09'43"
L=60.37'
R=1600.00'
D=9°33'22"
L=266.86'
N69°33'24"W
655.58'
N75°29'07"W 3363.88'
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)
N00°10'11"E 2613.04'
S89°37'12"E 2621.85'
S89°37'12"E 2621.85'
N00°10'30"E
1381.34'
PALO VERDE ROAD
LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
WILSON AVENUE
BROADWAY ROAD
S00°10'30"W 2607.97'
1226.63'
S89°40'02"E 2638.15'
N89°53'57"E 2616.03'
S00°02'16"W 2613.13'
N00°01'06"E 2583.81'
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 21
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR W/ NO ID
NORTH QUARTER
CORNER OF SECTION 21
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
NOTHING FOUND
NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SECTION 21
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 3/4" REBAR W/
NO ID
WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 21
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND PK NAIL W/ TAG RLS 36888
POINT OF BEGINNING
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 21
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND MCDOT BRASS CAP IN HAND
HOLE, RLS 54704, DATED 2018
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 21
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 2" BRASS CAP W/ RLS 15919,
DATED 1992
SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 21
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR W/ NO ID
EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 21
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR W/ CAP RLS 31034
MATCH LINE SHEET 2
PAGE 1 OF 11
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:08
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION
DISTRICT CANAL
2/13/2026
R=3550.00'
D=2°21'50"
L=146.46'
S83°55'14"W
991.14'
R=1650.00'
D=14°48'17"
L=426.35'
N81°16'29"W 3683.66'
N00°06'24"W 2044.03'
N89°31'30"E 2620.21'
S00°03'10"W
1715.90'
S00°03'31"W
328.17'
S89°31'30"W 2614.49'
LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
WILSON AVENUE
BROADWAY ROAD
S00°02'16"W 2613.13'
N00°01'06"E 2583.81'
S89°19'12"W 2637.04'
S89°29'21"W 2622.76'
N00°03'10"E 2625.17'
S00°03'31"W 2625.38'
PARCEL NO. 1
NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SECTION 22
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 3/4" REBAR W/
NO ID
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
SECTION 22
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 2" BRASS CAP W/
RLS 15919, DATED 1992
WEST QUARTER CORNER
OF SECTION 22
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR W/ CAP
RLS 31034
NORTH QUARTER
CORNER OF SECTION 22
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 3/4" REBAR W/
NO ID
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
SECTION 22
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ALUMINUM CAP
W/ RLS 32222
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 22
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR W/ TAG RLS 38862
MATCH LINE SHEET 1
MATCH LINE SHEET 4
MATCH LINE SHEET 3
PAGE 2 OF 11
A = EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 22
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ALUMINUM CAP W/ RLS 31034
POINT OF BEGINNING FOR EXCEPTION
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:08
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT CANAL
A
EXCEPTION TO
PARCEL NO. 1
2/13/2026
N89°22'06"E 2608.03'
S00°28'21"W
1270.24'
N89°22'06"E 2624.18'
S00°06'39"W 2624.67'
N00°44'55"E 2621.90'
N00°24'07"E
1270.21'
LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
S89°19'12"W 2637.04'
S89°29'21"W 2622.76'
S00°24'07"W 2612.60'
S89°13'39"W 2609.82'
S89°12'42"W 2609.46'
S00°28'21"W 2619.12'
N00°08'53"E 2625.96'
N89°22'06"E 5230.65'
S00°04'52"W 2619.08'
1348.84'
1342.39'
PARCEL NO. 1
NORTH QUARTER CORNER
OF SECTION 15
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR W/ NO ID
NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SECTION 15
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 2" MARICOPA
COUNTY ALUMINUM CAP, RLS
33307, DATED 2009
WEST QUARTER CORNER
OF SECTION 15
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 1" IRON PIPE W/
CAP RLS 31034
EAST QUARTER CORNER
OF SECTION 15
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 3/4" REBAR IN
CONCRETE
SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF SECTION 15
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 3/4" REBAR W/
NO ID
SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF SECTION 15
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR W/ TAG RLS
38862
CENTER OF SECTION 15
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND MARICOPA COUNTY ALUMINUM
CAP W/ RLS 33307, DATED 2009
PAGE 3 OF 11
MATCH LINE SHEET 2
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:08
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
MATCH LINE SHEET 1
MATCH LINE SHEET 3
2/13/2026
S89°23'59"E
1310.72'
S00°00'51"W 2305.24'
S89°02'30"E
1312.37'
N63°47'30"E
1456.02'
N70°36'40"E
960.03'
S00°15'19"E
1050.92'
L41
L42
L43
S64°41'40"W 2111.44'
R=1460.00'
D=13°22'43"
L=340.91'
S78°04'23"W 2285.37'
R=4675.00'
D=3°11'49"
L=260.86'
N00°08'12"W
9.18'
W
LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD
BROADWAY ROAD
N00°03'10"E 2625.17'
S00°03'31"W 2625.38'
1310.72'
N89°23'59"W 2621.43'
S89°24'13"E 2621.44'
S00°01'27"E 2643.96'
S88°59'26"E 2625.23'
S88°59'26"E 2625.58'
S88°34'56"E 2629.43'
S88°35'02"E 2629.47'
N00°05'57"W 2662.94'
N00°06'26"W 2662.93'
PARCEL NO. 1
PAGE 4 OF 11
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 23
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ALUMINUM CAP W/ RLS
32222
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 23
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR W/ TAG RLS 38862
WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ALUMINUM CAP W/ RLS 31034
SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ALUMINUM CAP W/ RLS 32222
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 23
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ADOT BRASS CAP IN HAND
HOLE W/ RLS 38862, DATED 2010
EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 23
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ADOT BRASS CAP IN HAND HOLE
W/ RLS 38862, DATED 2010
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 23
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ADOT BRASS CAP IN HAND HOLE
MATCH LINE SHEET 2
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:07
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
STATE ROUTE 85
RIDC
RIDC = ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT CANAL
EXCEPTION TO PARCEL NO. 1
SEE SHEET 7 FOR DETAIL
POINT "B"
2/13/2026
PARCEL NO. 2
N00°06'26"W
1331.34'
S89°15'48"E
1285.16'
L1
L2
L3
L4
C
1
L5
C2
C3
C
4
L6
L7
S79°59'33"W
740.22'
R=1590.00'
D=15°17'53"
L=424.53'
S64°41'40"W
2169.52'
N00°46'31"W
1312.52'
N00°05'57"W 2662.94'
N00°06'26"W 2662.93'
S89°38'57"E 2670.10'
N00°02'14"E 5301.68'
S89°23'26"E 5354.45'
N89°08'04"W 2683.39'
54.82'
PAGE 5 OF 11
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 24
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ADOT BRASS CAP IN HAND
HOLE W/ RLS 38862, DATED 2010
WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 24
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ADOT BRASS CAP IN HAND HOLE
W/ RLS 38862, DATED 2010
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 24
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND ADOT BRASS CAP IN HAND
HOLE
SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 24
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND CHISELED X IN HAND HOLE
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:08
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
NORTH QUARTER CORNER
OF SECTION 24
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 4 WEST
NOTHING FOUND
POINT OF
BEGINNING
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)
STATE ROUTE 85
ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION
DISTRICT CANAL
FINAL PLAT OF WESTPARK
PHASE 2.2 PARCEL 8
BOOK 1825, PAGE 50
(NOT A PART)
WARNER ROAD
SEE SHEET 6 FOR LINE TABLE
SEE SHEET 7 FOR CURVE TABLE
2/13/2026
PARCEL NO. 3
C8
L32
C
9
L33
L34
L35
L36
C10
L37
L33
L38
L39
S89°12'09"E 2683.52'
S89°39'35"E
83.54'
S00°01'20"E 1264.03'
S00°01'21"E 828.50'
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
C5
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20 C6
C7 L21
L22 L23
L24L25
L26 L27
L28 L29
L30 L31
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)
N00°08'03"E 2640.62'
S00°11'28"W
2637.74'
1320.31'
1320.31'
S39°08'57"E
RADIAL
PAGE 6 OF 11
EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 24
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR NO ID
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 13
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 24
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND REBAR NO ID
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 13
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST
FOUND 3" ALUMINUM CAP
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:08
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
POINT OF
BEGINNING
FINAL RE-PLAT OF WESTPARK
PARCEL 18S
BOOK 1700, PAGE 45, MCR
(NOT A PART)
FINAL PLAT OF
WESTPARK PHASE 2.2
PARCEL 19
BOOK 1700, PAGE 45,
MCR
(NOT A PART)
FINAL RE-PLAT OF
WESTPARK PARCEL 18S
BOOK 1700, PAGE 45,
MCR
(NOT A PART)
SEE SHEET 6 FOR LINE TABLE
SEE SHEET 7 FOR CURVE TABLE
2/13/2026
R=4675.00'
D=3°04'23"
L=250.74'
L44
C12
L45
C1
3
L46
L47
L48
L49
L50
L51
L52
L53
L54
L55
L56
L57
L58
L59
L60
L61
L62
L63
L64
L65
L66
L67
L68
C14 L69
C15
L70
C16
L71
L72
L73
L74
L75
L76
C17
L77
S64°41'40"W 1273.49'
R=1460.00'
D=13°22'43"
L=340.91'
S78°04'23"W 2285.37'
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:07
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 600'
JN
DMS
EXCEPTION TO PARCEL NO. 1
POINT "B"
POINT OF BEGINNING
OF EXCEPTION
PAGE 7 OF 11
N89°45'35"E
RADIAL
2/13/2026
LINE TABLE
LINE NO.
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
DIRECTION
S23°19'09"E
S66°15'05"W
S23°23'43"E
N66°36'17"E
N80°08'32"E
S01°22'33"W
S10°00'27"E
S89°59'43"W
N88°25'57"W
N83°03'53"W
N77°30'22"W
N72°52'08"W
N12°47'56"W
N81°24'32"W
N83°32'55"W
S88°24'31"W
N89°18'27"W
LENGTH
721.49'
39.12'
110.00'
444.39'
143.14'
132.58'
715.70'
460.05'
56.41'
56.29'
56.27'
828.41'
46.38'
40.03'
12.28'
110.00'
138.12'
LINE TABLE
LINE NO.
L19
L20
L21
L22
L23
L24
L25
L26
L27
L28
L29
L30
L31
L32
L33
L33
L34
DIRECTION
N00°53'57"E
N60°27'39"W
S84°11'47"E
N05°48'13"E
N00°00'00"E
N00°00'00"E
N04°18'59"E
N00°00'00"E
N90°00'00"W
N06°01'38"E
N00°00'00"E
N46°32'31"E
N03°25'33"E
N89°19'55"W
S19°00'32"W
S67°10'48"W
N39°49'09"E
LENGTH
52.97'
41.38'
113.14'
149.00'
140.85'
91.74'
53.15'
53.00'
113.95'
47.10'
50.00'
43.83'
80.00'
517.37'
139.06'
28.42'
45.62'
PAGE 8 OF 11
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:08
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
2/13/2026
LINE TABLE
LINE NO.
L35
L36
L37
L38
L39
L41
L42
L43
L44
L45
L46
L47
L48
L49
L50
L51
L52
DIRECTION
N34°35'28"W
N32°24'56"E
N22°02'47"W
N00°11'27"E
N00°12'11"E
S00°13'20"W
S04°58'56"W
S07°59'42"W
N00°08'12"W
N05°49'04"W
N00°03'31"E
N89°56'29"W
N00°03'31"E
S89°56'29"E
S44°56'29"E
S89°56'29"E
S00°03'31"W
LENGTH
116.03'
12.26'
155.00'
105.08'
493.52'
600.03'
1205.02'
84.59'
14.67'
518.24'
1245.96'
6.00'
542.00'
126.00'
63.64'
377.00'
10.00'
LINE TABLE
LINE NO.
L53
L54
L55
L56
L57
L58
L59
L60
L61
L62
L63
L64
L65
L66
L67
L68
L69
DIRECTION
S89°56'29"E
N45°03'31"E
S89°56'29"E
S44°56'29"E
S89°56'29"E
S00°03'31"W
S89°56'29"E
N45°03'31"E
S89°56'29"E
S44°56'29"E
S89°56'29"E
S00°03'31"W
S89°56'29"E
N00°03'31"E
S89°56'29"E
N44°47'44"E
S86°55'12"E
LENGTH
769.62'
50.91'
67.80'
36.77'
278.00'
6.00'
252.20'
50.91'
83.80'
42.43'
492.58'
10.00'
729.97'
6.00'
502.83'
63.35'
15.00'
PAGE 9 OF 11
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:07
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
2/13/2026
LINE TABLE
LINE NO.
L70
L71
L72
L73
L74
L75
L76
L77
DIRECTION
S86°42'14"E
S45°38'05"E
S01°18'19"E
S43°08'17"W
S01°51'43"E
S88°08'17"W
S01°51'43"E
S01°29'20"W
LENGTH
126.00'
58.11'
63.28'
41.07'
322.17'
12.00'
48.38'
859.75'
PAGE 10 OF 11
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:07
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
2/13/2026
CURVE TABLE
CURVE NO.
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
RADIUS
570.00'
570.00'
200.00'
650.93'
180.00'
50.00'
20.00'
2040.00'
740.00'
188.22'
1740.00'
1860.00'
5670.00'
5655.00'
5529.00'
1871.00'
DELTA
13°32'15"
19°20'45"
63°16'34"
32°43'54"
18°46'26"
78°53'05"
30°15'08"
2°45'29"
31°00'09"
10°16'18"
5°40'53"
5°52'36"
3°19'13"
0°12'58"
3°50'34"
3°21'03"
LENGTH
134.68'
192.46'
220.87'
371.86'
58.98'
68.84'
10.56'
98.20'
400.41'
33.74'
172.53'
190.77'
328.58'
21.33'
370.83'
109.42'
PAGE 11 OF 11
© 2026, COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, INC.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJ.NO.:
SCALE:
DATE:
U:\1300\1386\SURVEY\DOCS\LEGALS\
1386-WESTPARK OVERALL-EXHIBIT.dwg
2/13/2026 11:07
4742 N 24th Street, Suite 270
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
P: 602.490.0535 / F: 602.368.2436
Engineering
& Design
Formerly
WESTPARK
OVERALL PROPERTY
BUCKEYE, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT
1386
FEB 2026
1" = 1000'
JK
DMS
2/13/2026
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix D
DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN
(UNDER SEPARATE COVER)
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix E
WATER MASTER PLAN
(UNDER SEPARATE COVER)
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix F
WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN
(UNDER SEPARATE COVER)
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix G
OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT
Figure Number:
Drawn By:
Feb 2026
Date:
Project Number:
User: sidney.deaver
\\phxfil02\Legacy HW\J_Drive\Shared Folders\Project\1300\1386\GIS\1386.aprx
1
SKD
1386
Buckeye, Arizona
Land Ownership
0
1,500
Feet
±
SR-85
70
Flagstaff
Phoenix
Tucson
Ownership
GDC OZ LLC
KEMF SR EAST LLC
KEMF SR NORTH LLC
KEMF SR WEST LLC
KEMF WESTWIND EAST LLC
KEMF WESTWIND NORTH LLC
KEMF WESTWIND SH LLC
KEMF WESTWIND WEST LLC
KEMF WP 2 3 LLC
KEMF WP 2.3 LLC
KEMF WP 3 EAST LLC
KEMF WP 3 WEST LLC
KEMF WP COMMERCIAL LLC
KEMF WWG 1 LLC
GRED Escrow
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix H
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix I
ECONOMIC & FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
WESTPARK COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN
Economic & Fiscal Impact Analysis
Westpark Community Master Plan
Buckeye, Arizona
Prepared for:
Garrett Development Corporation
July 15, 2025
Prepared by:
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
Scottsdale, Arizona
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
TOC
www.arizonaeconomy.com
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
i
1.0
Introduction
1
1.1
Purpose of Study
1
1.2
Limiting Conditions
1
2.0
Assumptions & Methodology
3
2.1
Project Description & Analysis Assumptions
3
2.2
Economic Impact Methodology
5
2.3
Fiscal Impact Methodology
6
3.0
Impacts of Construction
11
3.1
Economic Impact of Construction
11
3.2
Fiscal Impact of Construction
13
4.0
Impacts of Commercial Operations and New Residents
15
4.1
Economic Impact of Operations
15
4.2
Fiscal Impact of Operations
17
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
i
Executive Summary
The following is report provides an estimate of the economic and fiscal impacts associated with
proposed developments within the Westpark Community Master Plan (Westpark CMP), a
1,455-acre master-planned area located in Buckeye, Arizona. The plan is organized into Mega
Sites 2, 3, and 4, and includes a diverse mix of land uses. Mega Site 2 is approximately 546
acres and has been designated for data center development. Mega Site 3 (approximately 534
acres) is proposed for various industrial uses such as warehousing, storage, logistics and
advanced manufacturing and Mega Site 4 is about 375 acres and planned to incorporate multi-
family residential housing along with various commercial and business park uses.
The proposed developments are expected to deliver substantial benefits, including significant
job creation and increased tax revenues for the City of Buckeye, its school districts and other
special jurisdictions. These benefits will arise from construction activities, ongoing commercial
operations, and the spending of new residents throughout the year.
Acres
Square feet
Construction
Cost
Equipment
Mega Site 2
Data Center
546.4 7,536,700
$5,275,690,000
$26,378,450,000
Mega Site 3
Advanced Industrial
178.0 2,893,067
$723,267,000
$2,893,067,000
Logistics
178.0 2,893,067
$578,613,000
$1,446,533,000
Warehousing/Storage
178.0 2,893,067
$289,307,000
$72,327,000
Mega Site 4
Retail
28.3 211,137
$42,227,000
$21,114,000
Restaurant
7.6 52,784
$10,557,000
$7,918,000
Business Park; Warehousing
86.2 1,210,540
$121,054,000
$30,263,000
Business Park; Light Industrial - 86.2 1,210,540
$242,108,000
$605,270,000
Business Park; Warehousing sto 86.2 1,210,540
$121,054,000
$30,263,000
Residential
Acres
Units
Construction
Cost
Equipment
Multi-family 1
31.5 339
$50,887,000
$1,018,000
Multi-family 2
16.1 174
$26,034,000
$521,000
Multi-family 3
32.6 462
$69,355,000
$1,387,000
1,455.1
$7,550,153,000
$31,488,131,000
Source: GDC Buckeye
Westpark Community Master Plan
(2025 Dollars)
Economic Impacts
Since the impacts represent the entire construction phase, which will take a number of years,
employment impacts are expressed as person years of employment. Person years of
employment are the aggregate of each construction job that is recreated each year throughout
the construction period. To derive the respective annual averages, employment, wages, and
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
ii
economic output can be divided by the expected number of years it may take to complete the
development. Annual averages may be higher or lower depending on the timing of final
buildout. Additionally, these construction impacts will disappear when the development
reaches completion.
Construction alone would generate 78,340 person years of employment, $5.9 billion in
wages, and $14.9 million in economic impact during construction. These impacts would
occur over years and will depend on future absorption in terms of estimating average
annual impacts.
Ongoing annual impacts within the proposed Westpark CMP at buildout, including impacts
generated by the spending of the residents and the commercial operations would create a
total of 23,374 jobs throughout the region, including 10,573 onsite jobs, $1.6 billion in
wages and over $5.7 billion in annual economic activity.
Construction Impact
Data Center
Commercial
Residential
Commercial
Total
Person Years of Employment
54,587
16,464
1,654
5,635
78,340
Wages ($ mil)
$4,127.0
$1,244.7
$122.8
$425.3
$5,919.8
Output ($ mil)
$10,436.3
$3,147.7
$266.5
$1,063.2
$14,913.6
Operations Impact
Direct jobs
500
6,037
136
3,900
10,573
Total jobs
2,705
13,629
204
6,836
23,374
Wages ($ mil)
$219.4
$1,005.7
$11.0
$397.1
$1,633.2
Output ($ mil)
$793.1
$3,619.6
$30.0
$1,230.8
$5,673.6
Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Company; IMPLAN
NOTE: The total may not equal the sum of the impacts due to rounding. All dollar figures are in constant dollars. Inflation has not been included in
these figures.
Mega Site 4
Economic Impact Summary
Westpark Community Master Plan
Greater Phoenix
(2025 Dollars)
Mega Site 2
Mega Site 3
Fiscal Impacts
Impacts During Construction
Construction would generate $613.9 million in tax revenues from the proposed
developments within the Westpark Community Master Plan. This includes both primary
(direct) taxes such as construction sales tax as well as secondary taxes generated by the
employees that will work on the project and spend money in the local economy.
Manufacturing facilities are exempt from equipment use tax under ARS 42-5159. Similarly,
computer data center equipment is exempt from both transaction privilege tax (TPT) and
use tax under ARS 41-1519. For the purposes of this report, it is assumed that 30% of the
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
iii
total construction value for data centers is taxable – representing the building shell and core
infrastructure. Additional revenues would be collected by the City for development and
impact fees.
Of this total, the State of Arizona will collect an estimated $398.3 million, Maricopa County
will receive $75.6 million, and Buckeye will collect an estimated $140.0 million. The figures
for the City include estimated residential impacts fees but exclude additional development
impact fees levied on commercial development that will vary by development type.
Fiscal Impact of Construction - All Jurisdictions
Data Center
Commercial
Residential
Commercial
Total
State of Arizona
Construction sales
$50,871,100
$51,143,700
$4,701,600
$17,260,200
$123,976,600
Use Tax
*
$85,056,100
$163,900
$5,015,200
$90,235,200
Secondary impacts from employees
$128,551,000
$38,772,100
$3,607,300
$13,163,100
$184,093,500
Maricopa County
Construction sales
$7,201,300
$7,239,900
$665,600
$2,443,300
$17,550,100
Secondary impacts from employees
$40,486,100
$12,210,900
$1,200,900
$4,166,000
$58,063,900
Buckeye
Construction/Spec Builder tax
$30,862,800
$32,579,600
$3,422,800
$11,467,300
$78,332,500
Permit/Impact Fees
N/A
N/A
$2,255,500
N/A
$2,255,500
Use Tax
**
$45,565,800
$87,700
$2,686,700
$48,340,200
Secondary impacts from employees
$7,731,300
$2,331,900
$232,600
$797,400
$11,093,200
Total all jurisdictions
$265,703,600
$274,900,000
$16,337,900
$56,999,200
$613,940,700
**Equipment used in manufacturing is exempt from sales (use) taxes under ARS 42-5159(B)(1)
Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Co.; IMPLAN; AZ Dept. of Revenue; AZ Tax Research Association
Fiscal Impact Summary of Construction
Westpark Community Master Plan
(2025 Dollars)
Mega Site 2
Mega Site 3
Mega Site 4
*Under ARS 41-1519, qualifying purchases of computer data center equipment are exempt from Arizona transaction privilege tax (TPT) and use tax when used in a certified computer data
center. This report assumes 30% of the construction value is dedicated to the shell and other non-exempt infrastructure.
Ongoing Annual Impacts from Operations
At build out, the operations of the data center, commercial developments and the spending
of the new residents will generate an estimated nearly $248.5 million each year in new
revenues from primary and secondary tax revenues. Significant tax revenue would include
new property taxes, utility sales tax, commercial lease tax, increases in state shared revenue
from new population, and employee related tax impacts. The secondary impacts take into
account that only a portion of the employees will live within Buckeye.
The State of Arizona will collect an estimated $87.8 million annually, while Maricopa County
will collect $39.1 million annually and Buckeye is projected to collect $56.4 million each
year.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
iv
Local school districts and special districts such as the community college district, libraries,
flood control, fire district assistance, and others would receive an estimated $65.2 million in
annual property taxes upon buildout of the projects.
Fiscal Impact of Operations - All Jurisdictions
Data Center
Commercial
Residential
Commercial
Total
State of Arizona
Sales tax
--
--
$141,600
$4,687,200
$4,828,800
Utility tax
$40,584,900
$4,964,300
$46,200
$1,844,600
$47,440,000
Secondary impacts from employees
$5,452,300
$21,144,500
$44,000
$8,896,400
$35,537,200
Maricopa County
Personal property tax
$137,600
$41,500
--
$14,100
$193,200
Real property tax
$5,503,500
$1,659,900
$101,700
$560,300
$7,825,400
Sales tax
--
--
$23,000
$764,900
$787,900
Utility Tax
$6,622,600
$506,300
$7,500
$216,200
$7,352,600
Increased state shared revenue
--
--
$550,200
--
$550,200
Secondary impacts from employees
$3,436,100
$12,890,300
$497,300
$5,614,800
$22,438,500
Buckeye
Personal property tax
$190,800
$57,600
--
$19,500
$267,900
Real property tax
$7,633,600
$2,302,300
$141,100
$777,100
$10,854,100
Sales tax
--
--
$99,000
$3,277,900
$3,376,900
Lease
--
$1,916,400
--
$794,500
$2,710,900
Utility Tax
$28,382,400
$2,169,800
$32,200
$926,900
$31,511,300
Increased state shared revenue
--
--
$897,300
--
$897,300
Secondary impacts from employees
$1,085,100
$3,971,400
$21,100
$1,707,500
$6,785,100
Other Districts
School districts
Personal property tax
$6,254,900
$1,046,200
--
$164,800
$7,465,900
Real property tax
$30,023,300
$9,055,200
$555,000
$3,056,000
$42,689,500
Special districts
Personal property tax
$1,875,200
$313,600
--
$49,500
$2,238,300
Real property tax
$9,001,000
$2,714,800
$166,400
$916,100
$12,798,300
Total tax revenues
$146,183,300
$64,754,100
$3,323,600
$34,288,300
$248,549,300
Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Co.; IMPLAN; AZ Dept. of Revenue; AZ Tax Research Association
Mega Site 2
Mega Site 3
Mega Site 4
Fiscal Impact Summary of Operations
Westpark Community Master Plan
(2025 Dollars)
The cumulative effects of the ongoing construction and absorption of the development will be
significant for the State of Arizona, Maricopa County, the City of Buckeye and other taxing
jurisdictions.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
1
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of Study
Elliott D. Pollack and Company was retained to perform an economic and fiscal impact analysis
of the proposed Westpark Community Master Plan. The proposed development represents a
broad array of uses – and encompasses a total of 1,455 acres. Mega Site 2 is approximately
546 acres and has been designated for data center development, Mega Site 3 (approximately
534 acres) is proposed for various industrial uses such as warehousing, storage, logistics and
advanced manufacturing. Mega Site 4 is about 375 acres and planned to incorporate multi-
family residential housing along with various commercial and business park uses.
Economic impact analysis examines the regional implications of an activity in terms of three
basic measures: output, earnings and job creation. Fiscal impact analysis, on the other hand,
evaluates the public revenues created by a particular activity. In fiscal impact analysis, the
primary revenue sources of a city, county or state government are analyzed to determine how
the activity may financially affect them.
1.2 Limiting Conditions
This study prepared by Elliott D. Pollack & Company is subject to the following considerations
and limiting conditions.
• It is our understanding that this study is for the client’s due diligence and other
planning purposes. Neither our report, nor its contents, nor any of our work were
intended to be included and, therefore, may not be referred to or quoted in whole
or in part, in any registration statement, prospectus, public filing, private offering
memorandum, or loan agreement without our prior written approval.
• The reported recommendation(s) represent the considered judgment of Elliott D.
Pollack and Company based on the facts, analyses and methodologies described in
the report.
• Except as specifically stated to the contrary, this study will not give consideration to
the following matters to the extent they exist: (i) matters of a legal nature, including
issues of legal title and compliance with federal, state and local laws and ordinances;
and (ii) environmental and engineering issues, and the costs associated with their
correction. The user of this study will be responsible for making his/her own
determination about the impact, if any, of these matters.
• This study is intended to be read and used as a whole and not in parts.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
2
• This study has not evaluated the feasibility or marketability of any site for planned
uses.
• Estimates regarding specific land use, construction costs and operating data were
provided by the client as well as reputable market resources as specified in the
tables within this report. Data has been reviewed and verified to determine its
reasonableness and applicability to the project.
• The economic and fiscal impact results of this analysis could be higher or lower than
estimated due to the uncertainty of the nature of the businesses that would locate to
the project. The figures used in this analysis have been taken from a broad average of
users and are meant to represent an example of what could happen should the
averages be met.
• This economic and fiscal impact study evaluates the potential “gross impacts” of
construction and operations activities. The term “gross impacts” as used in this
study refers to the total revenue, jobs and economic output that would be
generated by the construction and operations. The study does not consider the
potential impact on other businesses or real estate property in the trade area that
may occur as a result of the proposed project.
• The analysis is based on the current tax structure and rates imposed by the State,
counties, and local governments. Changes in those rates would alter the findings of
this study.
• All dollar amounts are stated in current dollars and, unless indicated, do not take
into account the effects of inflation.
• Our analysis is based on currently available information and estimates and
assumptions about long-term future development trends. Such estimates and
assumptions are subject to uncertainty and variation. Accordingly, we do not
represent them as results that will be achieved. Some assumptions inevitably will
not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur; therefore,
the actual results achieved may vary materially from the forecasted results. The
assumptions disclosed in this study are those that are believed to be significant to
the projections of future results.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
3
2.0 Assumptions & Methodology
2.1 Project Description & Analysis Assumptions
Westpark Community encompasses a total of 1,455 acres located in Buckeye, Arizona. The
proposed master plan includes several land uses and this report provides the impact of
construction as well ongoing annual impacts once construction is complete and the
developments have reached stabilization.
Site Location Westpark Community Master Plan
Assumptions used to estimate economic and fiscal impacts of the construction and operations
of the sites are outlined in the following tables. Primary inputs of the economic and fiscal
impact model are based on (1) project assumptions supplied by the client regarding the scale
and size of the project and (2) basic economic source data such as the Consumer Expenditure
Survey to determine spending patterns of employees and Census surveys showing live-work
relationships. All values in this study are expressed in 2025 dollars. Unless otherwise indicated,
an inflation factor has not been included in this analysis.
The proposed development includes approximately 7.5 million square feet of data center
facilities, 12.6 million square feet of various commercial uses, and 975 multi-family residential
units. The total estimated construction cost for these developments is approximately $7.6
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
4
billion, complemented by an additional $31.5 billion in equipment investment. The majority of
this equipment expenditure is driven by the highly specialized and capital-intensive
requirements of data center operations.
Acres
Square feet
Construction
Cost
Equipment
Mega Site 2
Data Center
546.4 7,536,700
$5,275,690,000
$26,378,450,000
Mega Site 3
Advanced Industrial
178.0 2,893,067
$723,267,000
$2,893,067,000
Logistics
178.0 2,893,067
$578,613,000
$1,446,533,000
Warehousing/Storage
178.0 2,893,067
$289,307,000
$72,327,000
Mega Site 4
Retail
28.3 211,137
$42,227,000
$21,114,000
Restaurant
7.6 52,784
$10,557,000
$7,918,000
Business Park; Warehousing
86.2 1,210,540
$121,054,000
$30,263,000
Business Park; Light Industrial - 86.2 1,210,540
$242,108,000
$605,270,000
Business Park; Warehousing sto 86.2 1,210,540
$121,054,000
$30,263,000
Residential
Acres
Units
Construction
Cost
Equipment
Multi-family 1
31.5 339
$50,887,000
$1,018,000
Multi-family 2
16.1 174
$26,034,000
$521,000
Multi-family 3
32.6 462
$69,355,000
$1,387,000
1,455.1
$7,550,153,000
$31,488,131,000
Source: GDC Buckeye
Westpark Community Master Plan
(2025 Dollars)
Proposed commercial components within the Westpark Community Master Plan include a
business commerce park, warehousing and storage, light and advanced manufacturing, logistics
along with retail and restaurant space. Each land use type was considered separately in terms
of its ability to support employment and generate revenue for Buckeye. For employment,
estimates per square foot for each commercial type are provided. This ranges from 100 square
feet per employee for restaurants up to 15,000 square feet per employee for data centers.
Sales revenue has been conservatively estimated at $400 per square foot per year for retail and
$650 per square foot for restaurants. Lease rates of approximately $9-$30 per square foot per
year restaurants are utilized in this analysis. The expected occupancy rate is 92%.
In terms of residential assumptions, the anticipated occupancy for the multi-family units was
based on 92% annually. Household size estimates were based on Census Bureau estimates for
the City of Buckeye for single family and multi-family homes.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
5
The following table illustrates these assumptions in detail.
Square feet
Average
Stabilized
Utilities
Commercial
per employee
Rent/SF
Occupancy
per SF
Sales / SF
Data Center
15,000
$0
100%
$125.53
--
Advanced Industrial
1,000
$15
92%
$15.00
--
Logistics
1,500
$12
92%
$15.00
--
Warehousing/Storage
2,000
$9
92%
$10.00
--
Retail
500
$25
92%
$2.40
$400
Restaurants
100
$30
92%
$2.40
$650
Units
Rent
Stabilized
Utilities
Income
Residential
per employee
per SF
Occupancy
per month
% on Rent
Multi-Family
45
$2.0
92%
$100.00
30%
Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Company; GDC Buckeye; SIOR; ULI; DOE
Operating Assumptions
Westpark Community Master Plan
(2025 Dollars)
2.2 Economic Impact Methodology
Economic impact analysis examines the economic implications of an activity in terms of output,
earnings, and employment. For this study, the analysis focuses on the impact during
construction as well as the ongoing impact of the project once the commercial buildings and
residential units are completed and occupied.
The different types of economic impacts are known as direct, indirect, and induced, according
to the manner in which the impacts are generated. For instance, direct employment consists of
permanent jobs held by construction employees during the construction phase and onsite
employees of the various project components on an ongoing basis. Indirect employment
includes jobs created by businesses that provide goods and services essential to the
construction and ongoing operations of the project. These businesses range from
manufacturers (who make goods) to wholesalers (who deliver goods), to services. Finally, the
spending of wages and salaries of direct and indirect employees on items such as food, housing,
transportation and medical services creates induced employment in all sectors of the economy,
throughout the region. These secondary effects are captured in the analysis conducted in this
study.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
6
Multipliers have been developed to estimate the indirect and induced impacts of various direct
economic activities. IMPLAN developed the multipliers used in this study. The economic
impact is categorized into three types of impacts:
(1) Employment Impact – the total wage and salary and self-employed jobs in a
region. Jobs include both part time and full-time workers.
(2) Earnings Impact – the personal income, earnings or wages, of the direct, indirect
and induced employees. Earnings include total wage and salary payments as
well as benefits of health and life insurance, retirement payments and any other
non-cash compensation.
(3) Economic Output – also referred to economic activity, relates to the gross
receipts for goods or services generated by a company’s operations.
Economic impacts are by their nature regional in character. Such impacts are best illustrated
when not assigned to a specific city or locality, although clearly the primary impact of job
creation would be on the municipality where the project is located. However, many other
communities in the County would also benefit from the construction and operations of the
project. People working at the development would commute to work from their homes in all
parts of the region. Therefore, the economic impact of the development project is expressed in
this report as a regional benefit.
2.3 Fiscal Impact Methodology
Fiscal impact analysis studies the public revenues associated with a particular economic activity.
The primary revenue sources of local, county, and state governments (i.e., taxes) are analyzed
to determine how an activity may affect the various jurisdictions. This section will evaluate the
impact of the development on Buckeye as well as provide the project impacts for the State of
Arizona, Maricopa County and various school and special districts.
Fiscal impact figures cited in this report have been generated from information provided by a
variety of sources including the U.S. Bureau of the Census; the U.S. Department of Labor; the
Internal Revenue Service; the State of Arizona; the Arizona Tax Research Association; and the
U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey. Elliott D. Pollack and Company has relied upon the
estimates of construction cost and operating revenues outlined in this study. Unless otherwise
stated, all dollar values are expressed in 2025 dollars.
Fiscal impacts are categorized by type in this study, similar to economic impact analysis. The
major sources of revenue generation for governmental entities are related to the proposed
construction and ongoing operations.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
7
Construction impacts relate to the revenues generated from construction of a project and
include state and local sales taxes levied on construction materials. These are the “primary”
revenues generated from the construction. In addition, the direct, indirect and induced
employees supported by the construction activity also generate revenues to local and state
governments. For instance, employees will spend part of their salaries on retail goods (thereby
paying sales taxes), pay property taxes on real estate they own and contribute to the other
revenue sources that are shared by the State with counties and local cities. In addition, part of
the State’s collection of sales taxes on construction materials is also shared with counties and
local cities. All of these revenues create benefits for counties and local cities. They are referred
to in this report as “secondary” impacts.
The ongoing operations of a real estate project also create beneficial fiscal effects for a
community. The primary source of revenue for this mixed-use development would be
generated from property taxes, sales taxes, and lease taxes. New residents will also create
beneficial fiscal effects. Households will spend part of their salaries on local goods and services.
This spending will contribute to revenues collected by Buckeye. Additionally, Buckeye will
benefit in terms of state shared revenue as the project will increase the City’s population and
the share of revenue that they receive from state sales taxes, state income taxes, and other
fees as outlined below.
The following is a description of the applicable revenue sources that will be considered for this
analysis.
• Prime Contracting Transaction Privilege Tax (Construction Sales Tax)
The State, counties, and local governments levy a sales tax on the construction of
buildings or development of land improvements. That tax is calculated by State law
under the assumption that 65% of the construction cost of the facility and its land
improvements are taxable. The sales tax rate is then applied to the 65% figure.
In an attempt to encourage data center expansion in Arizona, the State of Arizona offers
a prime contracting transaction privilege tax (construction sales tax) exemption as well
as a use tax exemptions at the state, county and local levels, on qualifying data center
equipment. The exemption was established under ARS 41-1519 for up to ten full
calendar years following certification. This analysis assumes the proposed data centers
on this site will qualify for state certification and that 70% of the total construction value
will be allocated to equipment-related components—such as installation, racks, servers,
cooling systems, generators, and networking gear—which are tax-exempt. The
remaining 30% is assumed to be attributable to the building shell and core
infrastructure, which is not exempt from tax.
The sales tax on construction is a one-time collection by the governmental entity. The
State currently levies a temporary 5.6% sales tax on construction activity (a portion of
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
8
which is shared with local governments) while Maricopa County levies a rate of 0.7%
and the City of Buckeye construction sales tax rate is 3.0%.
• Use Tax
The State of Arizona (and some local governments) levy a use tax on tangible property
equipment which is purchased or leased for storage or use in the State. The use tax for
the State is 5.6%. The City of Buckeye’s rate is 3.0% for taxable equipment and 1.1% for
a single item over $5,000. Equipment used in manufacturing is exempt from use tax
under ARS 42-5159 and computer data center equipment is exempt under ARS 41-1519.
• Transaction Privilege Tax (Sales Tax)
The State, counties, and local cities in Arizona charge sales tax on retail goods,
commercial leases and utility usage. The sales tax rate for the State is 5.6%. Portions of
this tax are redistributed through revenue sharing to counties and cities throughout
Arizona based on population. Buckeye levies a 3.0% sales tax rate (2.0% for commercial
leases).
These tax rates are applied to retail sales, commercial leases, and utility usage from the
entire master planned development as well as the spending of residents and employees.
Conservative sales performance at the retail and restaurant establishments were used
to determine sales tax revenue potential.
Based on data from the U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey, the projected extent of
retail spending by new residents and the resulting sales tax receipts was calculated. In
addition, the employees of the project are projected to spend money at retail and
restaurant establishments or purchase other local goods.
• Property Tax
The residential and commercial development will be subject to direct real property
taxes. Residential properties are levied at a 10% assessment ratio while commercial
properties will be levied at a 15% assessment ratio (at time of completion). Employees
supported by operations of the businesses will also pay real property taxes on the
homes they occupy. In order to estimate these secondary property taxes, the assessed
full cash value along with the projected value of a typical housing unit has been
calculated. Once the net assessed values are calculated for real property, the following
tax rates apply:
• Personal Property Taxes
Local taxing jurisdictions in Arizona levy a personal property tax on tangible equipment.
The value of the property is depreciated at a rate of 2.5% and the assessment ratio used
in this report is 15.0%.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
9
Once the net assessed values are calculated for the property, the following tax rates
apply:
Rate
Buckeye
1.6077
County General Fund
1.1591
School Districts
Palo Verde Elementary
3.3570
Buckeye High School
2.9662
Special Districts
Central Arizona Water Conservation District
0.1400
Flood Control
0.1470
Fire District Assistance Tax
0.0080
Library District
0.0470
Maricopa Special Health District
0.2665
Community College District
1.1047
West-MEC
0.1825
TOTAL
10.9857
Property Tax Rates
Westpark Community Master Plan
Source: County Treasurer
• State Shared Revenues
Each city in Arizona receives a portion of State revenues from four different sources -
State sales tax (see description above), State income tax, vehicle license tax and
highway user tax. The formulas for allocating these revenues are primarily based on
population. Counties also share in the revenue sources of the State, with the
exception of income tax.
State Income Tax
The State of Arizona collects taxes on personal income. The tax rate used in the
analysis averages about 1.6% for earnings. This percentage is based on the most
recently available income tax data from the Arizona Department of Revenue. The
factor is applied to the projected wage levels of direct, indirect and induced
employees supported by the construction and operations of the project. Portions
of this tax are redistributed through revenue sharing to cities throughout Arizona
based on population.
HURF Taxes
The State of Arizona collects specific taxes for the Highway User Revenue Fund
(HURF). Both the registration fees and the motor vehicle fuel tax (gas tax) are
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
10
considered in this analysis. The motor vehicle fuel tax is $0.18 per gallon and is
calculated based on a vehicle traveling 12,000 miles per year at 20 miles per
gallon. Registration fees average $66 per employee in the State of Arizona.
These factors are applied to the projected direct and indirect employee count.
Portions of these taxes are distributed to cities and counties throughout Arizona
based on a formula that includes population and the origin of gasoline sales.
Vehicle License Tax
The vehicle license tax is a personal property tax placed on vehicles at the time of
annual registration. This factor is applied to the projected direct, indirect and
induced employee count. The average tax used in this analysis is $325 and
portions of the total collections are distributed to the Highway User Revenue
Fund. The remaining funds are shared between cities and counties in accordance
with population-based formulas.
The above tax categories represent the largest sources of revenues that would be generated to
city, county, and State governments. This analysis considers gross tax collections and does not
differentiate among dedicated purposes or uses of such gross tax collections.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
11
3.0 Impact of Construction
Construction phase impacts are generally short-term effects related to onsite and offsite
construction employment as well as other supporting industries. However, a development of
this size will likely take years to be fully built out, so the construction phase impacts will be
ongoing for many years.
The long-term recurring benefits of a project are operational phase impacts. These include
employment, earnings and expenditures that recur over the long-term after the project is built
out as well as new resident spending impacts (Section 4.0).
3.1 Economic Impact of Construction
This portion of the report will outline economic impacts of the construction of proposed uses
for the Westpark Community Master Plan. The economic impact of construction includes total
economic output, job creation and wages. The results presented are based on the assumptions
of land use described in Section 2.0 of this report.
Since the impacts represent the entire construction phase, which will take decades,
employment impacts are expressed as person years of employment. Person years of
employment are the aggregate of each construction job that is recreated each year throughout
the construction period. To derive the respective annual averages, employment, wages, and
economic output can be divided by the expected number of years it may take to complete the
development. Annual averages may be higher or lower depending on the timing of final
buildout. Additionally, these construction impacts will disappear when the development
reaches completion.
The estimated $7.6 billion cost of construction for the residential and commercial
developments will generate 45,558 direct person years of employment earning an estimated
$3.6 billion in wages. An additional 32,782 indirect and induced person years of employment
will be created by ripple effects throughout the regional economy. These employees will earn
$2.3 billion and create $7.4 billion in economic activity.
In total, 78,340, person years of employment will be created during all phases of the proposed
residential development with wages of $5.9 billion and regional economic activity of $14.9
billion. The following table provides these impacts for the residential and the commercial
portions of each of the development areas.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
12
Data Center
Commercial
Residential
Commercial
Total
Person Years of Employment
Direct
31,645
9,544
1,077
3,292
45,558
Indirect
7,484
2,257
118
751
10,610
Induced
15,458
4,662
460
1,593
22,173
Total
54,587
16,464
1,654
5,635
78,340
Wages ($ mil)
Direct
$2,517.4
$759.3
$84.9
$261.2
$3,622.8
Indirect
$614.8
$185.4
$8.3
$61.6
$870.1
Induced
$994.8
$300.0
$29.6
$102.5
$1,427.0
Total
$4,127.0
$1,244.7
$122.8
$425.3
$5,919.8
Economic Output ($ mil)
Direct
$5,275.7
$1,591.2
$146.3
$537.0
$7,550.2
Indirect
$2,004.9
$604.7
$26.3
$201.0
$2,837.0
Induced
$3,155.7
$951.8
$93.9
$325.2
$4,526.5
Total
$10,436.3
$3,147.7
$266.5
$1,063.2
$14,913.6
Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Company; IMPLAN
Economic Impact of Construction
Westpark Community Master Plan
(2025 Dollars)
NOTE: The total may not equal the sum of the impacts due to rounding. All dollar figures are in constant dollars. Inflation has not been included in these
figures.
Mega Site 2
Megas Site 3
Mega Site 4
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
13
3.2 Fiscal Impact of Construction
The following table summarizes the revenues that would ultimately flow to the State, Maricopa
County and City of Buckeye from the construction at Westpark Community.
Some revenues are more direct and definable than others. Revenues have been defined in this
analysis as either primary or secondary, depending on their source and how the dollars flow
through the economy into government tax accounts. For instance, some revenues, such as
construction sales taxes, are definable, straightforward calculations based on the value of
construction. These revenues are described in this study as primary revenues.
Secondary revenues, on the other hand, flow from the wages of direct, indirect and induced
employees who are supported by the project as well as revenues distributed by the State from
various tax categories. Revenue projections are based on typical wages of the employees
working in the project, their spending patterns, projections of where they might live, and other
assumptions outlined earlier in this report.
The State of Arizona would collect an estimated $398.3 million in revenues during the
development of Westpark Community Master Plan. This includes both primary revenues
generated by construction sales tax and residential impact fees as well as revenues generated
by the employees. Similarly, the developments will generate an estimated $75.6 million for
Maricopa County and $140.0 million for the City of Buckey.
In total, the development of Westpark Community Master Plan will generate $613.9 million in
tax revenues during construction.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
14
Data Center
Commercial
Residential
Commercial
Total
State of Arizona
Construction sales
$50,871,100
$51,143,700
$4,701,600
$17,260,200
$123,976,600
Use Tax
--
$85,056,100
$163,900
$5,015,200
$90,235,200
Secondary impacts from employees
Spending sales tax
$32,854,700
$9,909,300
$985,200
$3,388,100
$47,137,300
Income tax
$73,203,900
$22,078,800
$1,940,300
$7,453,000
$104,676,000
Unemployment tax
$10,316,900
$3,111,700
$312,800
$1,065,000
$14,806,400
Vehicle license tax
$7,983,300
$2,407,900
$242,000
$824,200
$11,457,400
Gas tax
$4,192,200
$1,264,400
$127,000
$432,800
$6,016,400
Total for the State of Arizona
$179,422,100
$174,971,900
$8,472,800
$35,438,500
$398,305,300
Maricopa County
Construction sales
$7,201,300
$7,239,900
$665,600
$2,443,300
$17,550,100
Secondary impacts from employees
Spending sales tax
$5,659,300
$1,706,900
$169,800
$583,700
$8,119,700
Property tax
$16,220,100
$4,892,100
$491,600
$1,674,600
$23,278,400
State shared revenues
$18,606,700
$5,611,900
$539,500
$1,907,700
$26,665,800
Total for County
$47,687,400
$19,450,800
$1,866,500
$6,609,300
$75,614,000
Buckeye
Construction/Spec Builder tax
$30,862,800
$32,579,600
$3,422,800
$11,467,300
$78,332,500
Permit/Impact Fees
N/A
N/A
$2,255,500
N/A
$2,255,500
Use Tax
--
$45,565,800
$87,700
$2,686,700
$48,340,200
Secondary impacts from employees
Spending sales tax
$2,898,200
$874,100
$87,000
$298,900
$4,158,200
Property tax
$4,381,800
$1,321,600
$132,800
$452,200
$6,288,400
State shared revenues
$451,300
$136,200
$12,800
$46,300
$646,600
Total for City
$38,594,100
$80,477,300
$5,998,600
$14,951,400
$140,021,400
Total all jurisdictions
$265,703,600
$274,900,000
$16,337,900
$56,999,200
$613,940,700
Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Co.; IMPLAN; AZ Dept. of Revenue; AZ Tax Research Association
Mega Site 2
Mega Site 3
Mega Site 4
Fiscal Impact of Construction - All Jurisdictions
Westpark Community Master Plan
(2025 Dollars)
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
15
4.0 Impact of Commercial Operations and New Residents
As each portion of the development are completed, the State, Maricopa County, and City of
Buckeye will benefit significantly in terms of new employment and ongoing annual tax
revenues.
Operational phase impacts are examined in this section of the report. The impacts described
below are anticipated to occur at build-out; when construction is completed, and the
commercial space and residences are occupied to stabilized levels.
4.1 Economic Impact of Operations
Economic impact is centered primarily upon job creation and the impact that those employees
would have on the economy. Although the primary impact of the development would focus on
Buckeye, the entire region would benefit. Thus, the economic impacts are expressed as
regional impacts.
As new residents move into their homes in the Westpark Community Master Plan, they will
begin to spend a portion of their disposable income in the community and support a significant
number of jobs in the industries where their spending occurs. Resident spending on retail
goods, services, entertainment and restaurant and bars would support direct, indirect, and
induced jobs, wages, and annual economic activity.
The commercial operations create direct onsite jobs in the local economy. The job estimates
are based on the square footage assumptions outlined in Section 2.0 of this report.
In total, an estimated 23,374 direct, indirect, and induced employees would be supported by
the residential spending and new commercial development within the Westpark Community
Master Plan. This employment would create $1.6 billion in wages and generate over $5.7
billion in economic activity each year.
The following table displays the results of the economic impact analysis from annual operations
with the inclusion of reasonable vacancy rates.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
16
Mega Site 2
Mega Site 3
Mega Site 4
Total
Jobs
Direct
500
6,037
4,036
10,573
Indirect
1,383
3,825
1,475
6,682
Induced
822
3,768
1,529
6,119
Total
2,705
13,629
7,040
23,374
Wages ($ mil)
Direct
$67.5
$448.9
$209.2
$725.6
Indirect
$98.9
$314.2
$100.6
$513.6
Induced
$52.9
$242.6
$98.5
$394.0
Total
$219.4
$1,005.7
$408.2
$1,633.2
Economic Output ($ mil)
Direct
$349.2
$1,926.9
$617.3
$2,893.4
Indirect
$276.2
$923.1
$331.1
$1,530.4
Induced
$167.8
$769.6
$312.3
$1,249.8
Total
$793.1
$3,619.6
$1,260.8
$5,673.6
Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Company; IMPLAN
(2025 Dollars)
NOTE: The total may not equal the sum of the impacts due to rounding. All dollar figures are in constant
dollars. Inflation has not been included in these figures.
Economic Impact of Operations
Westpark Community Master Plan
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
17
4.2 Fiscal Impact of Operations
Similar to the fiscal impact of construction, the effects of operations of the proposed uses of
the development have been divided into primary and secondary impacts. The primary impacts
of the project would be generated from property taxes, retail sales taxes, commercial lease
taxes, and utility taxes. The secondary effects of the project relate to state shared revenue
from an increase in population as well as from the employees who would work in the project
including employee spending (which generates sales taxes) and various other tax payments
such as income taxes, vehicle license taxes, and gasoline taxes.
The State of Arizona will collect an estimated $87.8 million in primary and secondary taxes
generated by the new developments in Westpark Community. This includes the sales tax that
would be generated by the spending of the new residents, sales tax generated at the retail and
restaurant operations as well as the taxes generated by the employees.
Similarly, Maricopa County would collect $39.1 million each year from both the residential and
commercial operations and the secondary impact from employees and the City of Buckeye
would collect an estimated $56.4 million each year of ongoing operations.
Local school districts would collect an estimated $50.2 million each year from real property
taxes and other special taxing jurisdictions would collect an additional $15.0 million each year
at buildout.
In total the Westpark Community Master Plan will generate an estimated $248.5 million each
year from the ongoing operations of the development including the sales taxes collected from
the commercial developments and the resident spending, property taxes, increased state
shared revenues and taxes generated by employee spending.
Economic & Fiscal Impact of Westpark Community Master Plan– Buckeye, AZ
Elliott D. Pollack & Company
www.arizonaeconomy.com
18
Commercial
Commercial
Residential
Commercial
Total
State of Arizona
Sales tax
--
--
$141,600
$4,687,200
$4,828,800
Utility tax
$40,584,900
$4,964,300
$46,200
$1,844,600
$47,440,000
Secondary impacts from employees
Spending sales tax
$4,114,200
$14,502,900
$27,400
$5,674,400
$24,318,900
Income tax
$223,700
$1,025,800
$1,900
$405,100
$1,656,500
Unemployment tax
$511,200
$2,575,900
$6,700
$1,292,000
$4,385,800
Vehicle license tax
$395,500
$1,993,200
$5,200
$999,900
$3,393,800
Gas tax
$207,700
$1,046,700
$2,800
$525,000
$1,782,200
Maricopa County
Personal property tax
$137,600
$41,500
--
$14,100
$193,200
Real property tax
$5,503,500
$1,659,900
$101,700
$560,300
$7,825,400
Sales tax
--
--
$23,000
$764,900
$787,900
Utility Tax
$6,622,600
$506,300
$7,500
$216,200
$7,352,600
Increased state shared revenue
--
--
$550,200
--
$550,200
Secondary impacts from employees
Spending sales tax
$706,600
$2,499,500
$4,800
$988,200
$4,199,100
Property tax
$1,948,900
$7,217,500
$16,200
$3,230,300
$12,412,900
State shared revenues
$780,600
$3,173,300
$476,300
$1,396,300
$5,826,500
Buckeye
Personal property tax
$190,800
$57,600
--
$19,500
$267,900
Real property tax
$7,633,600
$2,302,300
$141,100
$777,100
$10,854,100
Sales tax
--
--
$99,000
$3,277,900
$3,376,900
Lease
--
$1,916,400
--
$794,500
$2,710,900
Utility Tax
$28,382,400
$2,169,800
$32,200
$926,900
$31,511,300
Increased state shared revenue
--
--
$897,300
--
$897,300
Secondary impacts from employees
Spending sales tax
$361,900
$1,280,100
$2,500
$506,000
$2,150,500
Property tax
$702,000
$2,599,800
$5,800
$1,163,500
$4,471,100
State shared revenues
$21,200
$91,500
$12,800
$38,000
$163,500
Other Districts
School districts
Personal property tax
$6,254,900
$1,046,200
--
$164,800
$7,465,900
Real property tax
$30,023,300
$9,055,200
$555,000
$3,056,000
$42,689,500
Special districts
Personal property tax
$1,875,200
$313,600
--
$49,500
$2,238,300
Real property tax
$9,001,000
$2,714,800
$166,400
$916,100
$12,798,300
Total tax revenues
$146,183,300
$64,754,100
$3,323,600
$34,288,300
$248,549,300
Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Co.; IMPLAN; AZ Dept. of Revenue; AZ Tax Research Association
Mega Site 3
Mega Site 4
Mega Site 2
Fiscal Impact of Operations - All Jurisdictions
Westpark Community Master Plan
(2025 Dollars)
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix J
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
(UNDER SEPARATE COVER)
WESTPARK CMP
Appendix K
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CONSENT REGARDING
SILVERROCK CMP