Buckeye SS4A Application Narrative.pdf

City of Buckeye — Regular Council Meeting (2026-06-16)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 36875 characters
Safe Streets and Roads for All - 
2026 Implementation Grant Application 
Pro-Actively 
Reducing Risks for 
a Growing Buckeye 
May 20, 2026

Safe Streets and Roads for All
2026 Implementation Grant Application
 
 
Table of 
CONTENTS 
I. Overview 
01 
II. Location & Map 
03 
III. Response to Merit Criteria 
06 
• 01 Safety Need 
08 
• 02 Safety Impact 
07 
• 03 Implementation Costs 
09 
• 04 Engagement and Collaboration 
10 
IV. Project Readiness 
10 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Page 2 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness


Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
I. Overview 
The City of Buckeye, Arizona (City) is one of the fastest-
growing cities in the United States. Since 2000, Buckeye’s 
population has grown by approximately 1,730% to an 
estimated 114,000 people (2025) and is expected to continue 
growing. With more land available for future growth, Buckeye 
is projected to reach approximately 300,000 residents by 2040. 
The rapid population growth has led to an increased number of 
drivers and vehicles on Buckeye’s roads, raising exposure for 
life-altering crashes, and highlighting the importance of 
ongoing efforts to take a proactive approach to improve 
roadway safety and reduce crashes. 
Both the number of overall crashes and the number of crashes 
involving a fatality or serious injury ((Killed or Seriously 
Injured (KSI)) have continued to rise at almost the identical 
pace of population growth. From 2019 to 2023, a total of 
4,427 crashes were reported for the Buckeye municipal 
planning area, which included 52 fatal crashes and 133 serious 
injury crashes, totaling 185 KSI crashes and 241 people killed 
or seriously injured. For consistency, the local crash data 
summarized in this application reflects the same five-year 
period from 2019 to 2023, which was accessed from the 
Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT); crashes 
occurring on Interstate 10 (I-10) are excluded from the local 
crash data analysis. 
Evaluating the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data 
(2019-2023), there were 76 people killed in fatal car crashes in 
Buckeye. With Buckeye’s population at 91,502 in 2020 (per 
the 2020 Census), the average annual fatality rate of the 
City of Buckeye is alarmingly high at 16.61 per 100,000 in 
comparison to the national 2023 fatality rate of 12.21. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 1: City of Buckeye, AZ - Rural/Urban and Areas of 
Persistent Poverty 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness

Arizona
Buckeye 
Phoenix
Tuscon
Surprise
 
 
Teravalis
Coyote Ridge
White Tank
Mountain 
Buckeye
Verrado
Tartesso
Skyline Regional
Park 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodyear
Wintersberg
Phoenix Valley West
 
Dixie
Estrella Mountain
Regional Park 
Estrella
Dells 
Signal Mountain Wilderness/
Woosley Peak Wilderness 
North Maricopa 
Mountain Wilderness
Project Area 
Analyzed 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Johnson Rd 
Bruner Rd 
Palo Verde Rd 
Wilson Rd 
Turner Rd 
Sun Valley Pkwy 
Rooks Rd 
Miller Rd 
Apache Rd 
Watson Rd  
Rainbow Rd 
Dean Rd 
Verrado Way 
Jackrabbit Trl 
Perryville Rd

Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 2
 
 
 
 
 
 
Buckeye is committed to changing course and ensuring that KSI 
crashes don’t increase faster than population growth, and that 
KSI crashes are, in fact, reduced to zero. To that end, the City 
was awarded SS4A funding to create the Buckeye 
Transportation Safety Plan (TSP) through the FY2024 SS4A 
funding cycle. 
Buckeye’s safety action planning process began in early 2025 
and was completed when the final TSP was approved by the 
Buckeye City Council on May 5, 2026. The plan identifies 
several goals, including the following: Plan and build safety 
improvements for all types of travel so that serious injuries and 
deaths do not increase faster than the population because 
EVERYONE deserves to travel Buckeye’s roadways without 
the risk of preventable, life-altering crashes. 
 
Table 1: Overview of Proposed Projects Requesting SS4A Funding 
To achieve this goal, the City of Buckeye is requesting 
$16,142,400.00 from the SS4A discretionary grant program 
to implement a group of engineering, education, and public 
safety infrastructure improvements that align with the Safe 
Systems approach to proactively reduce KSI crashes. The 
$16,142,400 SS4A funding request will be supported by the 
City’s match of $4,035,600, resulting in a total application cost of 
$20,178,000. 
The infrastructure project on Yuma Road: 237th Ln to 221st Ave, 
and Watson Rd and West Sundance Ave will address a major 
east-west arterial in Buckeye’s High-Risk Network (HRN) 
through deliberate and proven safety countermeasures that 
respond directly to KSI crash types in Buckeye’s urban area. Of 
 
Reconstruct high injury 
locations that are on the 
high-risk network on 
Yuma Road and at the 
Watson Road and West Sundance 
Avenue intersection. Safety based 
design elements include: 
• 22 High visibility crosswalk enhancements 
• Inclusion of backplate retro-reflective borders 
at 6 intersections 
• Lighting improvements at 6 intersections 
• Median reconstruction to remove negative 
offset left turns at 13 locations 
• Yellow change interval improvements at 6 
signalized intersections 
• Changing signal operations to protect 
only left turn operations at 2 locations 
• Up to 3 intersections with leading 
pedestrian intervals 
• Signal timing optimization at 6 
intersections 
• Restriction of left turns at 5 access 
points/intersections 
Launch a citywide safety 
education campaign 
targeted at changing driver 
behaviors. 
 
• Conduct a three-year citywide safety education campaign that includes pre- and 
post-campaign evaluation. 
Modernize public safety 
infrastructure to improve 
post-crash care with 
detection, response, and 
clearance efficiency upgrades. 
Upgrades to Buckeye’s traffic incident 
management system includes: 
• Expansion at the Real-Time Information 
Center 
• Equipment at the 911 Communications Center 
• Additional drones and docking stations 
for emergency responders 
• New traffic accident detection and 
investigation software and portable 
cameras 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness


Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 3
 
 
 
 
 
 
the 241 people that were killed or seriously injured, 12 
occurred on the proposed project corridor, Yuma Rd, and at the 
Watson Rd / Sundance Ave intersection. Overall, the project 
will reconstruct 13 locations, including 6 signalized 
intersections, 5 unsignalized intersections, and 2 access points. 
A phased approach to deliver this project, as Group A and 
Group B are suggested to lower the construction impact on the 
traveling public. 
The three-year safety education campaign will be done at a 
citywide scale over three years throughout the City to address 
problematic driver behaviors: speeding, seatbelt use, distracted 
driving, impaired driving, and e-bicycle/motorcycle use. 
Addressing these behaviors through a coordinated, multi-year 
education campaign focused on seatbelt use, impaired driving, 
and distracted driving is critical to reducing preventable 
fatalities and serious injuries in Buckeye. These efforts will 
complement enforcement and infrastructure strategies identified 
in the TSP by increasing awareness, reinforcing safe driving 
habits, and targeting the primary contributors to severe crash 
outcomes. Focusing on these high-risk behaviors provides a 
cost-effective, data-driven approach to improving safety within 
developed areas where the City can directly implement and 
influence change. 
The request for expansion and modernization of components 
to improve traffic incident management (TIM), public safety 
infrastructure, will proactively address the post-crash care 
response with the goal of reducing response time, thereby 
saving lives. With a significant land-size footprint of the City 
that includes both rural and urban infrastructure, these 
improvements are vital to continue to reduce response time. 
Expanding four aspects of traffic incident management: 
detection, response, and  
clearance efficiency, will position Buckeye as a leader addressing 
large areas that have both rural and urban areas. The elements of 
this request include: 
• Real-Time Information Center: new mapping computer (1), 
security camera trailers (2), pole cameras (2), tethered drones 
(2), signal detector (2), mobile RTIC computer (2) 
• Equipment at the 911 Communications Center: new 911 
stations (2), and a monopole for communications and 
intersection cameras (1) 
• Additional drones and docking stations as first responders’ 
program (5) 
• New traffic accident detection and investigation software (10) 
and portable cameras (2) 
 
II. Location & Map: 
As noted previously, the City of Buckeye is experiencing 
significant growth in both population and land development. The 
City’s current incorporated area is close to 400 square miles, 
comparable to Houston, TX, and over 100 square miles larger 
than neighboring Phoenix, while its planning boundary is over 
640 square miles. As shown in Figure 1, the City is mainly a 
rural area, 90% agriculture/open space, with urban/population 
clusters that include industrial/commercial use and residential 
areas and has over 1,000 miles of roadways. On average, there 
are over 5,000 people moving into Buckeye per year. As land is 
developed, roadway ownership moves from Maricopa County to 
the City of Buckeye, which sets the roadway engineering design 
standards for arterials, while ADOT owns and operates the state 
highways and interstates (State Route 85 (SR-85) and I-10) that 
traverse the City. 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness


Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Infrastructure Project: The proposed roadway safety 
improvement project is located on Yuma Rd from 237th Ln to 
221st Ave, and at the intersection of Watson Rd and West 
Sundance Ave. Both locations are in the urban area of Buckeye, 
just south of the I-10 freeway. The majority of the neighborhoods 
adjacent to the projects are suburban single-family residential 
(57%) with complementary commercial development (12%). 
While the roadways and housing developments have places for 
people to walk and streets for people to ride bicycles, people 
primarily drive to get from place to place due to the overall 
expansive size of the City. 
An overview of existing conditions for Yuma Rd: 237th Ln to 
221st Ave, and the intersection of Watson Rd and West Sundance 
Ave are outlined below, and additional information, including the 
proposed project elements, is explained in Figure 2 on page 5. 
• Yuma Rd from 237th Ln to Watson Rd is a 4-lane arterial 
with striped bike lanes, detached sidewalks, a raised median, 
and a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour (mph). 
• Yuma Rd from Watson Rd to 221st Ave is a 6-lane arterial 
with a striped bike lane, detached sidewalks, a raised median, 
and a posted speed limit of 45 mph 
• The Watson Rd and West Sundance Ave intersection provides 
access to major commercial development and provides only 
one turning lane per leg of the intersection, and the left 
turning lanes for each approach have a negative offset. 
• The Yuma Rd corridor supports 16,000 vehicles per day, 
which is the highest number of vehicles on an east/west 
arterial in the City. 
• Yuma Rd corridor: Supports the only bus route in the City, 
Valley Metro bus route #685, which runs along Yuma Rd 
and has stops at Watson Rd intersection, connecting the 
Buckeye Community Center and the Coyote Branch Library. 
Additionally, the Buckeye public-school districts have two 
bus routes operating on the corridor, with bus stops on 
Yuma Rd. 
• There are 6 signalized intersections along the corridor: None 
have reflective back plates, nor high visibility crossings, and 6 
have negative offset, permissive turning movements. 
• There are 5 unsignalized intersections along the corridor: 2 
have negative left turning offsets and either a crash history 
or are near another intersection. There are two access 
points to/from commercial areas, east and west of the Yuma 
Rd and Watson Rd intersection, with no turning restrictions 
that result in a high concentration of turning movement. 
Education Campaign: The proposed education campaign project 
will be done at a citywide level, which includes both rural and 
urban parts of the City, and areas classified as persistent poverty; 
see Figure 1 to visually review these areas. 
Public Safety Improvements: The request for public safety 
infrastructure will be done at a citywide level, which includes both 
rural and urban parts of the City, and areas classified as persistent 
poverty; see Figure 1 to visually review these areas. 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness


Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 5
 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness

Figure 2: 
13
Group A
Group B
W. Sundance Ave
N
0.1 Mi
Signalized Intersection
Unsignalized Intersection
Access Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 
Yuma Rd. 
8
9
10
11
12
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Existing Conditions + Crash History = Proposed Improvements 
Group A 
Yuma Rd & 237th Ln #1: Negative offset left turns + 22 Crashes, 50% are rear-end crashes, and 1 pedestrian KSI = Photometric analysis and lighting improvements, 
Upgrade crosswalks to high visibility, mitigate negative offset left turns with median reconstruction, Backplate with retroreflective borders. 
Yuma Rd & 232nd Ln #2: Unrestricted turning movements + 1 left-turn and 1 pedestrian KSI crash = Construct restricted crossing to eliminate direct left turns and 
crossings. 
Yuma Rd & Watson Rd #3: Negative offset left turns + 124 Crashes, 31% are left-turn crashes, 3 KSI crashes = Photometric analysis and lighting improvements, Upgrade 
crosswalks to high visibility, Mitigate negative offset left turns with median reconstruction, Backplate with retroreflective borders, Evaluate for leading pedestrian interval, 
Increase queue length for eastbound left turns and add in dual left turn, and Traffic signal modifications. 
Yuma Rd & Access Rd #4: Unrestricted turning movements + 19 Crashes, 79% are angle crashes = Construct a restricted crossing to eliminate direct left turns and 
crossings. 
Yuma Rd & Sundance Pkwy#5: Negative offset left turns + 23 Crashes, 43% are rear-end, 3 KSI crashes = Photometric analysis and lighting improvements, Upgrade 
crosswalks to high visibility, mitigate negative offset left turns with median reconstruction, Backplate with retroreflective borders. 
Group B 
Yuma Rd & 232nd Ave #6: Unrestricted turning movements + 1 left-turn crash and 1 pedestrian KSI = Construct a restricted crossing, left-in left-out (LILO). 
Yuma Rd & 230th Ave #7: Negative offset left turns + 2 crashes resulting in 6 people being seriously injured = Mitigate negative offset left turns with median reconstruction. 
Yuma Rd & 228th Ln #8: Unrestricted turning movements + 4 crashes resulting 4 people being serious injured = Construct a restricted crossing - LILO. 
Yuma Rd & Rainbow Rd #9: Negative offset left turns + 31 Crashes, 42% are angle crashes, 4 KSI crashes = Photometric analysis and lighting improvements, Upgrade 
crosswalks to high visibility, mitigate negative offset left turns with median reconstruction, Backplate with retroreflective borders. 
Yuma Rd & 225th Dr #10: Unrestricted turning movements + 31 Crashes, 42% are angle crashes, 4 KSI crashes = a restricted crossing, left-in left-out (LILO). 
Yuma Rd & 223rd Ln #11: Negative offset left turns + 2 Crashes, 50% are rear-end crashes, 1 pedestrian KSI = Mitigate negative offset left turns with median 
reconstruction. 
Yuma Rd & 221st Ave #12: Negative offset left turns + 22 Crashes, 50% are rear-end crashes, 1 KSI crash = Photometric analysis and lighting improvements, Upgrade 
crosswalks to high visibility, Mitigate negative offset with median reconstruction, Backplate with retroreflective borders, Evaluate for leading pedestrian interval. 
Watson Rd & W. Sundance Ave #13: Negative offset left turns + 74 Crashes, 45% are angle crashes = Photometric analysis and lighting improvements, Upgrade 
crosswalks to high visibility, mitigate negative offset left turns with median reconstruction, Backplate with retroreflective borders, add in dual left turn lanes, and evaluate 
for leading pedestrian interval. 
237th Ln 
Watson Rd. 
232nd Ave 
230th Ave 
228th Ave 
Rainbow Rd. 
225th Dr. 
221st Ln

Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 6 
 
 
 
 
 
 
III. 
Criteria 
#1 Safety Need: As Buckeye’s TSP outlined the complex 
safety problem and identified solutions, strategies, and projects, 
the proposed group of projects presented in this application for 
SS4A implementation funding directly address the urgency to 
remedy the roadway safety problem. 
Buckeye intends to address the safety and crash history, 
begin reducing KSI crashes, and prevent them from 
occurring. Buckeye is requesting funding for 3 project 
types: infrastructure, education, and improved public safety 
infrastructure. Each project addresses different crash types, 
contributing factors, and location-specific issues. These include 
the following: 
 
The proposed infrastructure projects on Yuma and Watson 
Roads are on the high-risk network (HRN) and were identified 
as a priority in the implementation program of Buckeye’s TSP. 
As part of the comprehensive crash analysis, the TSP identified 
high-injury locations and an HRN. Unlike methods that focus 
primarily on locations with a history of frequent crashes, the 
Buckeye HRN offers a proactive approach by identifying areas 
with an increased risk, even if they have not yet experienced a 
high number of incidents. 
 
An overview of the crash picture on Yuma and Watson Roads 
is noted below and detailed per location in Figure 2: 
• Yuma Rd corridor: Had 12 serious injury crashes between 
2019-2023, 9% of all serious injury crashes in the City 
• Yuma Rd corridor: Of the 415 total crashes on the project 
corridor, 83% occurred at intersections. 
- The most common collision manners were rear-end 
(29%), angle (26%), and left turn (23%) 
- Five collisions involved non-motorized users – 3 
pedestrians and 2 bikes – two of those resulted in 
 
 
serious injuries. 
- 35% of crashes involved a failure to yield to the ROW 
traffic, 25% of crashes involved speeding, and 6% 
involved impairment. 
• The Watson Rd and West Sundance Ave intersection has one 
of the highest numbers of crashes at intersections in the City: 
74 crashes, 32% rear end, and 45% angle + left-turn crashes. 
The three-year safety education campaign will focus on 
addressing four major driver behaviors contributing to crash 
results based upon the data: speeding, seatbelt use, impaired 
driving, distracted driving, and e-bicycle use, as a recent rise in 
concern. The safety education campaigns will directly address 
contributing factors in KSI crashes and stakeholder input. 
Crash analyses conducted for the Buckeye TSP identified driver 
behavior as a contributing factor in a significant share of KSI 
crashes Citywide. While 241 people were killed or seriously 
injured across Buckeye between 2019 and 2023, a focused 
review of crashes within the developed areas shows that these 
severe crashes are closely tied to preventable driver behaviors. 
Approximately one in four severe crashes involved a single 
vehicle, the majority of which involved collisions with fixed 
objects. Within these crashes, speeding was a factor in 53%, 
impairment in 42%, and unrestrained drivers in 47%, indicating 
a strong relationship between driver behavior and crash severity. 
Addressing these behaviors through a coordinated, multi-year 
education campaign focused on seatbelt use, impaired driving, 
and distracted driving is critical to reducing preventable fatalities 
and serious injuries in Buckeye. 
The request for public safety infrastructure will expand four 
aspects of traffic incident management and will position Buckeye 
as a leader regarding municipalities that are large in size and have 
both rural and urban areas. The requested funding will support
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness


Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 7 
 
 
 
 
 
 
improvements for Buckeye’s Real-Time Information Center 
(RTIC), the 911communications center, the drones as first 
responders (DFR) program, and video detection cameras at 
intersections, post-crash care, emergency response coordination, 
and prehospital blood transfusion activities. Due to the many 
factors that influence emergency response times, such as urban 
versus rural, topographical barriers, staffing size, and extreme 
weather events, it is difficult to compare specific agencies versus 
national averages. However, the current National Fire Protection 
Association (NFPA) Standard 1710 benchmark for fire 
department first unit response time is 4 minutes, whereas the 
Buckeye Fire 90th percentile response time is 8 minutes, 49 
seconds. This is due to the lack of fire stations within Buckeye’s 
vast 640 square miles of response area. The Buckeye Police 
Department’s priority 1 response time is similar to the national 
average at 4 minutes, 54 seconds. Buckeye is constantly looking 
at ways to improve response times and post-crash care 
influences, which have been considered in the TSP. The 
continued population growth and roadway congestion will 
continue to challenge response times. 
#2 Safety Impact: As part of Buckeye’s approved TSP, there are 
recommended strategies and prioritized projects that incorporate 
proven safety countermeasures and known effectiveness to reduce 
KSI crashes based on the Federal Highway Administration’s 
(FHWA) Proven Safety Countermeasures, National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Manual on Uniform 
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and Crash Modification 
Factors (CMF) Clearinghouse. Table 2 on page 8 outlines the 
three proposed projects, the related Buckeye’s TSP strategy 
identification number from the plan, and the anticipated 
effectiveness of this improvement. Of significant note, the public 
safety infrastructure elements include the expansion of existing  
timing optimization and drones as first responders. These 
facilities and the implementation of new technologies, such as 
signal improvements, will allow Buckeye to keep pace with 
population growth and maintain safety standards. By mitigating 
safety risks, it is anticipated that the roadways will be safer for 
all users, driver behavior will improve, and public safety will be 
enhanced to support the ultimate goal of eliminating fatalities 
and serious injuries in the City. 
#3 Implementation Costs: Table 3 on page 9 outlines the 
cost details of each project that is requested through this 
application. The request for funding for the infrastructure 
projects, complemented by a comprehensive education campaign 
and the public safety infrastructure improvements, employ 
the Responsibility is Shared via the Safe Systems Approach, 
which echoes the foundation of the Buckeye SAP Funding. 
These different types of projects together provide redundant 
measures across five pillars: safe road users, vehicles, speeds, 
roads, and post-crash care. As noted in Table #, the anticipated 
reduction in crashes and KSI crashes is significant. 
 
Funding these projects together will take a proactive, safe 
systems approach to reduce Buckeye’s high fatality rate of 
16.61 motor vehicle traffic deaths per 100,000 people. 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness


Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 8 
 
 
 
 
 
Table 2: Safety Impact of Proposed Projects Requesting SS4A Funding 
 
Infrastructure 
Proposed Project Elements 
Buckeye TSP Strategy Anticipated Effectiveness 
High Visibility Crosswalk Enhancements (6 
intersections, 22 crosswalks) 
ID 17 
15 to 70% reduction in single vehicle/pedestrian 
crashes 
Inclusion Of Backplate Retroreflective Borders at 6
Intersections 
- 
15% reduction in total crashes 
Lighting Improvements at 6 Intersections 
ID 12, 17 
53% reduction of single-vehicle / pedestrian crashes 
Median Reconstruction at 13 Locations on the 
Corridor (26 medians) 
ID 3, ID 13 
5 to 57% reduction in angle, left-turn, and rear-end 
crashes 
Yellow Change Interval Improvements at 6 
Signalized Intersections 
ID 25 
8 to 50% reduction in speeding-related crashes 
Additional Protected Only Left Turn Operations at 
2 Signalized Intersections 
ID 5 
38 to 100% reduction in failure to yield crashes 
Up to 3 Intersections with Leading Pedestrian 
Intervals 
ID 17 
15 to 70% reduction in single-vehicle and pedestrian/ 
bicyclist crashes 
Signal Timing Optimization at 6 Intersections 
ID 1 
15 to 64% reduction in rear-end crashes 
Restriction of Left Turns at 5 Access Points/ 
Intersections 
ID 13 
5 to 56% reduction in rear-end and pedestrian/ 
bicyclist crashes 
Education Campaign 
3 Year Safety Education Campaign 
ID 23, ID 20, ID 21 
1 to 3 Stars 
Public Safety Infrastructure 
Real-Time Information Center Expansion 
 
 
ID 31 
 
These elements are anticipated to help Buckeye 
safety response teams keep pace with future 
population growth and increase roadway congestion 
911 Communications Center Expansion 
Drones as First Responders’ Program Expansion 
Video Cameras at Signalized Intersections 
Expansion 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness


Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 9 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Table 3: Costs of Proposed Projects 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#4 Engagement and Collaboration: The City of Buckeye 
recognizes that proactive communication and meaningful public 
engagement are essential to the success of transportation safety 
projects. Buckeye maintains communications guidelines that 
establish a consistent framework for how the City communicates 
construction projects to residents, businesses, stakeholders, 
media, and City leadership. City guidelines outline roles 
and responsibilities for City staff, as well as a five-phase 
communications plan with objectives, recommended outreach 
tools, and key information to be shared during each phase of 
project development and implementation. These procedures 
ensure transparency, consistency, and continued public 
involvement throughout planning, design, construction, and 
implementation. 
In the development of Buckeye’s TSP, the planning process 
included a two-phase public engagement process that identified 
widespread community support for enhanced roadway safety 
improvements throughout the City. During public engagement, 
residents, businesses, and community stakeholders were asked to 
identify transportation safety concerns and locations perceived to 
be unsafe. Public feedback, specifically 15 people, identified 
recurring concerns along the proposed Yuma Rd corridor and 
Watson Rd and West Sundance Ave intersection, including 
limited turn-lane capacity, speeding, access management 
challenges, and conflicts between vehicles, pedestrians, and 
bicyclists. This demonstrates strong community awareness of 
existing roadway risks and support for targeted safety 
improvements. 
From community input gathered during the development of 
Buckeye’s TSP, the most concerning behaviors identified were: 
 
Failure to Yield 
Speeding 
Distracted Driving 
 
The proposed infrastructure improvements are site-specific 
along Yuma and Watson Roads that serve a rapidly growing 
and diverse population. According to the U.S. Census Bureau 
2020–2024 American Community Survey (ACS) estimates, the 
block groups immediately surrounding these roadways contain 
an estimated population of 24,441 residents, approximately 65% 
of whom identify as minority populations. These corridors also serve 
residents with varying transportation needs, including commuters, 
school-aged children, and individuals with limited access to 
alternative transportation options. By prioritizing  improvements in 
areas with documented safety concerns and significant underserved 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness

 
Proposed Projects 
 
Total Cost SS4A 
Request 
Buckeye's 
Local 
Match 
Infrastructure 
Group A: Locations #1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 
$9,218,000 
$7,374,400 
$1,843,600 
Group B: Locations #6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 
11, 12 and 13 
$8,319,000 
$6,655,200 
$1,663,800 
Infrastructure Sub-Total
$17,537,000 
$14,029,600 
$3,507,400 
Education Campaign 
3 Yr Education Campaign 
$625,000 
$500,000 
$125,000 
Education Campaign Sub-Total
$625,000 
$500,000 
$125,000 
Public Safety Infrastructure 
Improving Traffic Incident Response 
Elements 
$2,016,000 
$1,612,800 
$403,200 
Public Safety Sub-Total
$2,016,000 
$1,612,800 
$403,200 
Total
$20,178,000 
$16,142,400 
$4,035,600 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness


Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 10
 
 
 
 
 
 
populations, the project supports equitable investment in 
underserved communities and advances the City’s goal of 
reducing roadway fatalities and serious injuries for all users. The 
proposed public safety infrastructure activities will extend 
throughout the City (50% of which is identified as an 
underserved community by the USDOT) and include safety 
education, public awareness, and stakeholder coordination 
initiatives designed to improve traffic safety outcomes across the 
broader community. 
If awarded funding for this project, the City will continue 
engaging residents and stakeholders throughout all phases of 
project delivery by utilizing a combination of public meetings, 
stakeholder workshops, digital engagement tools, social media, 
project webpages, construction notifications, and coordination 
with community organizations and local businesses. These 
project elements will require leveraging partnerships with 
regional agencies, such as MAG and other stakeholders, to 
support the implementation of identified strategies and maximize 
long-term safety benefits. 
 
Section IV: Project Readiness 
The City of Buckeye has the experience to accomplish this group 
of projects within the 5-year time frame of the 2026 NOFO and 
account for the federally required process. Examples of prior 
Federal grant experience include grants received from the U.S. 
DOT, U.S DOJ, HUD, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, 
and U.S. Department of Treasury. Buckeye’s operating standards 
include, but are not limited to, Buy America, civil rights, ADA, 
and Davis Bacon.  
The City of Buckeye has a full-time Capital Improvement Program 
Department (CIPD), which has successfully completed over 20 
projects similar to this proposed project. Buckeye was the sole 
administrator of these projects. If awarded, this project will be 
included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Per required 
processes, Buckeye will contract with ADOT for construction 
administration, and the project will be included in the State 
Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP). Buckeye understands 
federal project development milestones, as well as a history of 
delivery for all types of proposed projects with federal funding, 
stable local funding sources, and local political support. 
The CIPD uses outside consultants to create structure and 
construction documents, which are subsequently reviewed and 
approved by the City staff. The CIPD conducts a construction bid 
process to select the contractors to execute the planned project. 
Thereafter, seasoned CIPD staff oversee, monitor, and inspect the 
project from start to completion. This includes, but is not limited 
to, permits, traffic control, inspections, and closeout. After the 60% 
design stage, Buckeye will identify the ROW needs and begin 
ROW acquisition. Buckeye will obtain appraisals of the needed 
ROW, contact the landowner, and begin the acquisition process. 
Based upon past experience and familiarity with the proposed 
project, project risks, such as procurement delays, environmental 
uncertainties and approvals, increases in real estate acquisition 
costs, lack of legislative approval, and other risks that may affect 
the likelihood of a successful project start and completion, have 
been taken into account through the budget and scheduling 
process. Infrastructure projects are anticipated to be a categorical 
exclusion (CATEX) based on working in the City’s right-of-way. 
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process has not 
commenced, but due to Buckeye’s familiarity with this project 
and experience with prior similar projects, and the project 
scheduling allowance that was incorporated, Buckeye does not 
anticipate that the NEPA will be a no-go milestone. Additionally, 
the same applies to local regulatory approvals and permits.  All

Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 11
 
 
 
 
 
 
required real property and right-of-way acquisitions will be 
completed in a timely manner in accordance with 49 CFR part 24, 
23 CFR part 710, and other applicable legal requirements and 
have been appropriately scheduled. 
The proposed infrastructure improvements are intentionally 
structured as two independent projects within the same geographic 
corridor to improve delivery flexibility, reduce implementation 
risk, and maximize the likelihood of timely advancement through 
ADOT-administered procurement and environmental processes. 
While both projects support the same overall safety objectives, one 
segment anticipates a small need for right-of-way acquisition and 
utility relocation activities, while the other can advance without 
those constraints. Separating the projects allows one segment to 
continue progressing if unforeseen issues delay the other, reducing 
the risk that a single issue could stall the entire corridor investment. 
 
From a delivery perspective, dividing the effort into two projects 
increases procurement efficiency through ADOT’s existing 
Project Development On-Call (PDOC) consultant contracts that are 
federally compliant. This avoids the longer timelines associated 
with full and open procurement for a larger project. The approach 
is also expected to improve construction competition and pricing 
by creating project packages that are more attractive and 
manageable for a broader pool of contractors. Finally, if the SS4A 
request is not fully awarded, the City retains the flexibility to 
advance one project independently, ensuring meaningful safety of 
the entire corridor program. Improvements can still move forward 
without requiring full funding of the entire corridor program. 
If awarded funding through SS4A, the City of Buckeye will 
commit to the complete construction of the two infrastructure 
projects within 5 years, completing the education campaign within 
4 years, and the public safety infrastructure within 1 to 3 years, 
all prior to the grant requirement of completing projects within 5 
years. The NEPA and permitting process will be procured as part 
of engineering services. An early action item to be completed is 
to determine which analysis is required –CATEX, Environmental 
Assessment /Finding of No Significant Impact (EA/FONSI), or 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Buckeye’s expectation is 
that this project will be CATEX. 
Infrastructure Projects: The City of Buckeye is proposing to 
design and construct the infrastructure improvements through 
two projects: Group A: Locations #1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and Group B 
B: Locations 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13. Table # outlines the 
proposed project delivery schedule for the two infrastructure 
projects. 
 
Comprehensive Education Campaign and Public Safety 
Infrastructure: These projects will follow a slightly different 
schedule due to the nature of the projects. The Education 
Campaign will be a service-based project, and the Public Safety 
Infrastructure project will be procurement-based. 
 
Figure 3 on page 12 outlines the proposed project delivery 
schedule for the two infrastructure projects, the education 
campaign, and public safety infrastructure purchases. 
 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness


Safe Streets and Roads for All 
2026 Implementation Grant Application
Page 12
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOC
I. Overview
II. Location & Map
III. Criteria
IV. Project Readiness
