PLZM-25-0100 - 26602 W MC85 Annexation - Staff Report - CC20260407.docx
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
6807 characters
Case PLZM-25-0100 – 26602 W MC 85 Annexation Page 1 of 5 ANNEXATION Report to the Mayor and City Council CASE NUMBER: PLZM-25-0100 TITLE: 26602 W MC 85 Annexation MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 Applicant/Owner: Esencia LLC, on behalf of property owner, Robert Road Spirit LLC Request: Annexation of one parcel District: Location: 2 Northeast corner of MC 85 and SR 85 (Exhibits A, B, and C) Site Size: Approximately 0.89 acres Public Input: No comments have been received to date Recommendation: Conduct a Public Hearing and Adopt Ordinance Case PLZM-25-0100 – 26602 W MC 85 Annexation Page 2 of 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Esencia LLC, on behalf of property owner, Robert Road Spirit LLC, is requesting annexation of one parcel of land totaling approximately 0.89 acres, located at the northeast corner of MC 85 and SR 85 (see Exhibits A, B, and C). The subject property is developed with a convenience store and fuel canopy, and no future phases of development are planned (see Exhibit D, Project Narrative). The property intends to connect to City water upon annexation. 2. The blank petition for the proposed annexation was recorded on January 20, 2026 (Exhibit E). Per state law governing annexation, a public hearing providing any affected parties with an opportunity to comment on the request must be held at least 20, but no more than 30 days following recordation of the blank petition. The initial public hearing for this annexation was held on February 17, 2026, conforming to timing requirements established by state statute. 3. The signed petition for the proposed annexation was recorded on March 18, 2026 (Exhibit F). AREA CONTEXT: 4. Table 1: Existing Land Use, General Plan Designation, and Zoning District: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY: 5. The applicant is required to provide published notice at least six (6) days in advance of the first public hearing and 15 days prior to the end of the waiting period and site postings at least six (6) days in advance of the public hearing, as required by the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS §9‐471). Because the first round of applicant notices did not identify the second public hearing date, an additional published notice and updated site postings are required 15 days in advance of the second public hearing. Due to staff report submittal deadlines, the second LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING Subject Property Convenience store with gas sales Employment Maricopa County General Commercial (C-3) North (across Buckeye Canal) Existing agricultural/farming (future industrial) Employment General Commerce (GC) South (across MC 85) Transportation/logistics Employment Maricopa County General Commercial (C-3) & Regional Commercial (C-3) East Future convenience store with gas sales Employment Regional Commercial (C-3) West (across SR 85) Utility (APS HUBwest) Employment General Commerce (GC) Case PLZM-25-0100 – 26602 W MC 85 Annexation Page 3 of 5 published notice and updated site postings have not been completed as of March 17, 2026, but are scheduled for completion in advance of the deadlines. 6. At least six (6) days in advance of the first public hearing, City staff mails notice to all property owners within the annexation boundary (based on information received from the Maricopa County Assessor and the Arizona Department of Revenue) and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. Mailing notice, advertising both hearing dates, was completed in accordance with the Development Code and Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS §9‐471) prior to the first hearing. 7. Table 2: Public Notices: Notification Element Date Published Notice First Notice: January 30, 2026 Second Notice: To be completed on or before March 23, 2026 Site Posted First Notice: February 4, 2026 Second Notice: To be completed on or before March 23, 2026 Mailing Notice to Property Owners Within Annexation Boundary February 10, 2026 Mailing Notice to Maricopa County Board of Supervisors February 10, 2026 8. No public spoke during the public hearing for this item on February 17, 2026. No public comment concerning the annexation request has been received to date. ANALYSIS: 9. The subject property is presently located in the jurisdiction of Maricopa County and zoned General Commercial (C-3). Upon adoption of an annexation ordinance, the parcel included within this request would be assigned City of Buckeye Regional Commercial (C-3) zoning, the district most closely aligned with the property’s current County C-3 zoning designation. No future rezoning of the subject property is anticipated. 10. The property currently features a General Plan land use designation of Employment, which is intended for areas of development that have a focus on employment opportunities that contribute to the overall local and regional economy. This may include industrial uses, such Case PLZM-25-0100 – 26602 W MC 85 Annexation Page 4 of 5 as warehouses and manufacturing facilities, as well as business parks. Industrial uses should be buffered and/or separated from existing or planned residential uses. Uses within the Employment designation should have vehicular access to major arterials. 11. The existing use, convenience store with gas sales, is consistent with both the Employment land use and C-3 zoning. 12. The annexation proposal meets eligibility for size, dimension, and contiguity requirements for annexations as outlined in ARS §9‐471. 13. Once annexed, the property will be serviced by City of Buckeye Police and Fire and will be within the City of Buckeye sewer and water service areas. 14. The property is located within the Buckeye Union High School and Buckeye Elementary School Districts. The proposed annexation has no anticipated impact on either school district. 15. The following City of Buckeye departments have reviewed and have found no outstanding issues with the application: a. Development Services, including Planning and Engineering/Survey b. Fire c. Public Works d. Water Resources RECOMMENDATION: 16. The Staff recommends the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt the Ordinance approving the annexation for the following reasons: a. Furthers goals of the Buckeye General Plan; b. Conformance with the Buckeye Development Code; and c. No outstanding issues from reviewing departments. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A – Vicinity Map Exhibit B – General Plan Land Use Map Exhibit C – Zoning Map Exhibit D – Project Narrative Exhibit E – Recorded Blank Annexation Petition Exhibit F – Recorded Signed Annexation Petition Prepared By: Mandy Woods, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner Case PLZM-25-0100 – 26602 W MC 85 Annexation Page 5 of 5 Reviewed By: Ken Galica, Planning Manager