PLZM-25-0107_-_Project_H20_Rezone_Modification_of_Stipulations_-_Staff_Report_- PZ20260210.docx

City of Buckeye — Planning & Zoning Commission (2026-02-10)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 12123 characters
PLZM-25-0107 – Project H20 Rezone Modification of Stipulations – February 10, 2026 
Page 1 of 6 
 
Modification of Stipulations 
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission 
 
 
CASE NUMBER: 
PLZM-25-0107 
TITLE: 
Project H2O Rezone Modification of Stipulations 
MEETING DATE: 
February 10, 2026 
 
Applicant: 
Christy McDonough, on behalf of Phoenix Hydrogen Hub LLC 
 
Request: 
Modify Ordinance 18-23 to remove requirement that site may only 
develop as a hydrogen gas production facility 
 
Council District: 
2 
Location: 
Approximately 4,700 feet west of the northwest corner of State 
Route 85 and Patterson Road 
Site Size: 
Approximately 158 acres 
Public Input: 
None received 
 
Recommendation: 
Conduct a Public Hearing and recommend approval of Case 
PLZM-25-0107 (Project H2O Rezone Modification of Stipulations) 
to the Mayor and City Council, to modify conditions of Ordinance 
No. 18-23 to conditions (a) through (k) as modified below

PLZM-25-0107 – Project H20 Rezone Modification of Stipulations – February 10, 2026 
Page 2 of 6 
 
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 
1. Ms. Christy McDonough, on behalf of Phoenix Hydrogen Hub LLC is requesting approval 
to remove stipulation “a” and modify stipulations “b” and “d” of Ordinance No.18-23. 
When it was adopted, Ordinance No. 18-23 codified the rezoning of approximately 158 
acres from Single-Family 43 (SF-43) to Heavy Industrial (I-2).  The purpose of the rezoning 
was to allow a hydrogen gas production facility, along with ancillary components.  The 
applicant is seeking these modifications to allow the property, which is now within the I-
2 zoning district, to develop for expanded industrial uses and not be limited to hydrogen 
production.  
AREA CONTEXT:  
2. Table 1: Existing Land Use, General Plan Designation, and Zoning District: 
 
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY: 
3. A neighborhood meeting, providing an opportunity for interested parties to learn more 
about the request, was held on December 11th, 2025, at 6:00 P.M. at Heritage Cafe, 409 
Monroe Avenue. As required by Buckeye Development Code, written notices to property 
owners within 500 feet of the subject site were mailed on November 26, 2025, over 
fifteen (15) days prior to the date of the meeting. Present at the meeting were two 
representatives of the applicant and one City staff member. No members of the public 
attended the meeting 
4. No members of the public contacted the applicant with concerns regarding this request. 
The Arizona Department of Transportation, which owns property to the east of the 
 
LAND USE 
GENERAL PLAN 
ZONING 
Subject 
Property 
Agriculture 
Employment 
Heavy Industrial (I-2)  
North 
Agriculture 
Rural 
Single-Family Residential (SF-
43) 
South  
Fallow Farmland 
Employment 
General Commerce (GC) 
East 
Agriculture 
Rural 
Single-Family Residential (SF-
43) 
West  
Agriculture 
Rural 
Single-Family Residential (SF-
43)

PLZM-25-0107 – Project H20 Rezone Modification of Stipulations – February 10, 2026 
Page 3 of 6 
 
subject site, acknowledging receiving the mailed notice. Staff has also not received any 
written or verbal feedback from the public pertaining to this request.  
5. All required notifications of this public hearing were completed at least fifteen (15) days 
in advance of the meeting date, as follows:  
Notification Element 
Date 
West Valley View 
January 21, 2026 
Site Posted 
January 20, 2026 
Mailing Notice to Property Owners Within 500 
Feet of Site 
January 21, 2026 
 
BACKGROUND: 
 
6. April 2010: The subject property, along with additional properties comprising 920.83 
acres in sum, was annexed into the City of Buckeye by Ordinance 04-10. The property was 
assigned initial City Single-Family Rural Residential (SF-43) zoning. 
7. April 2018/August 2018: City Council approved the Imagine Buckeye General Plan 2040, 
designating the subject site as Rural on the future land use map. Voters ratified the 
approved General Plan in August that same year. 
8. May 2023: City Council adopted Resolution 29-23 which amended the land use 
designation of the subject site from Rural to Employment.  The site remains designated 
as Employment. 
9. May 2023: City Council adopted Ordinance No. 18-23 to rezone the subject property from 
SF-43 to I-2, with conditions “a” through “k”.  At the time, the then-owner intended to 
develop a hydrogen production facility on the site, which was reflected in the conditions 
of approval attached to this Ordinance. The I-2 zoning with the hydrogen-focused 
conditions remains in place today.  
ANALYSIS: 
10. The General Plan Future Land Use Map designates the subject property as Employment.  
Employment is the appropriate land use designation for Heavy Industrial (I-2) zoning.  
11. The proposed modification of stipulations removes the restriction that the property 
develops as a hydrogen production facility, allowing for any use that is permitted within

PLZM-25-0107 – Project H20 Rezone Modification of Stipulations – February 10, 2026 
Page 4 of 6 
 
the Heavy Industrial (I-2) zoning district. The I-2 zoning would remain consistent with the 
General Plan.   
12. The subject site is surrounded by a larger 920-acre parcel under like ownership as the 
subject property. The General Plan designates the 920 acres as Rural. The applicant has 
indicated that eventually this property will function in correlation with the subject site.  
At that time the greater 920-acre parcel will have to go through a Major General Plan 
Amendment to amend the future land use designation to Employment.  Alternatively, the 
land use designation could be amended via the ten-year General Plan update anticipated 
in 2028.  Beyond the land designated as rural the site is surrounded by employment on 
the north, east, and south, making industrial uses on the site consistent with the General 
Plan land use designations for the surrounding area.   
13. The applicant team has an active site plan in review for an APS substation on the subject 
property.  The applicant has indicated that the eventual development of the site is likely 
to include a data center campus, which is what the substation will primarily serve.  As of 
writing this staff report there have not been any additional plan submittals for data 
centers on the site.  A data center is allowed as a conditional use within the I-2 zoning 
district and would require Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval by the Planning and 
Zoning Commission and administrative site plan approval. Expansion of the data center 
use, or any industrial use, beyond the subject 157 acres will require additional rezoning 
of the surrounding property in conjunction with or following the General Plan 
Amendment. 
RECOMMENDATION: 
14. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission hold a public hearing and 
recommend approval of the Project H20 Rezone Modification of Stipulations (Case PLZZ-
25-0107), with recommended modified stipulations “a” through “l” for the following 
reasons: 
 
 The modification of stipulations will allow for diversified industrial 
development that can utilize available and planned electrical infrastructure on 
and near the site. 
 The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and will allow development 
of the site consistent with planned future land use patterns for the area. 
 There are no outstanding issues for reviewing departments (Engineering, Fire, 
Public Works, Community Services, Police, Water Resources, and 
Development Services).

PLZM-25-0107 – Project H20 Rezone Modification of Stipulations – February 10, 2026 
Page 5 of 6 
 
a. Development of the property shall be in general conformance with the Project 
Narrative entitled “Project H2O Rezone Modification of Stipulations Request” 
project narrative consisting of seven pages, dated December 9, 2025, and stamped 
received December 10, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions.  
b. Additional stipulations pertaining to development of the site will also be provided 
as part of the project’s Site Plan review.  
c. The property owner/s and their successor waive any and all claims for diminution 
in value of the property with regard to any action taken by City of Buckeye as result 
of this approval. 
d. Prior to issuance of any permits for development, the developer shall submit, and 
the Buckeye Fire Department shall approve, an emergency response plan related 
to future operation of the site.  
e. This project is subject to a Street Light Improvement District (SLID) in accordance 
with City of Buckeye Ordinance 43-05. The SLID shall be established prior to the 
recordation of a plat or minor subdivision as determined in the SLID guidelines, 
and submitted with the plat/minor subdivision or before. 
f. All trash shall be collected through a City of Buckeye licensed trash hauler, 
including construction debris. Trash enclosures shall be in accordance with City of 
Buckeye standards. 
g. All stormwater plans must meet the requirements of the City of Buckeye’s MS4 
permit as issued by ADEQ (Permit Number AZG2016-002). 
h. The Buckeye Fire Chief and City Engineer shall determine the number, location, 
and types of all fire hydrants. 
i. All buildings shall be equipped with a fire protection system as required by City of 
Buckeye Ordinance 03-22. 
j. Prior to delivery of any combustible materials to the site, fire protection systems 
shall be completely operational, with proper fire flow, and in accordance with the 
plans approved by the Buckeye Fire Chief and City Engineer. 
k. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a 
distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall 
diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line 
between accesses. 
l. Adherence to the following Transportation and Traffic Stipulations: 
i. Prior to approval of a site plan or pre-plat, a Traffic Impact Statement is 
required to be submitted and approved.  This should give both 
construction traffic daily and peak hour volumes along with after the site 
is developed.

PLZM-25-0107 – Project H20 Rezone Modification of Stipulations – February 10, 2026 
Page 6 of 6 
 
ii. Coordination with ADOT will be required. They may require analysis of 
intersections in a TIA.  
iii. The access off 283rd Avenue may be full access in the interim but will be 
restricted to Right-in/Right out or a ¾ access in the future when 283rd 
Avenue is fully built out.  
iv. Prior to the release of any civil permit, the Property Owner/Developer 
shall pay a pro rata share cost of up to nine (9) regional future traffic 
signals to be installed within this section of land.  The pro rata share is 
based on a ratio of the project acreage to the developable acreage within 
the section. The sectional contribution is to be based on the following 
allocation of costs: (i) 25 percent share of four (4) possible signals at 
arterial street intersections; (ii) 50 percent share of four (4) possible 
signals at half-mile collector street intersections or project entries; and 
(iii) 100 percent share of one (1) possible signal internal to this 
project.  The cost shall be based on an anticipated signal cost as 
determined by the City. 
v. In the event that access to and within the project is deemed a threat to 
public safety and security by the City, the City has broad authority to take 
such action as it deems necessary to address such a threat until such time 
as the Property Owner/Developer eliminates the safety concerns to the 
City’s satisfaction.  The Property Owner/Developer is responsible for 
revising the roadway and access layout to alleviate the City’s concerns 
with respect to public safety and security.  Any such changes will be 
considered a minor change to existing site plan approvals and shall be 
approved by the City. 
ATTACHMENTS: 
Exhibit A – Vicinity Map 
Exhibit B – General Plan Land Use Map 
Exhibit C – Existing Zoning Map 
Exhibit D – Narrative 
Exhibit E – Citizen Participation Report 
 
Prepared By: 
Joseph Mueller, Senior Planner 
 
Reviewed By: 
Ken Galica, Planning Manager