2025 IWMP.pdf

City of Buckeye — Regular Council Meeting (2026-01-06)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 486981 characters
City of Buckeye 
2025 Integrated Water  
Master Plan
Final / November 2025

City of Buckeye 
2025 Integrated Water Master Plan 
November 2025 / FINAL  
Digitally signed by Richard A, Humpherys
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.
Date: 2025.12.16 11:03:43-07'00'
Digitally signed by Eric J. McLeskey
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, Inc.
Date: 2025.12.16 11:14:27-07'00'

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
i 
Contents 
CHAPTER 1 
INTRODUCTION 
1.1 
Overview 
1-1 
1.2 
Previous Studies 
1-1 
1.2.1 
2017 Integrated Water Master Plan 
1-1 
1.2.2 
2020 Water Resources Master Plan 
1-2 
1.3 
IWMP Purpose 
1-2 
1.4 
Report Organization 
1-4 
1.4.1 
Chapter 2: Planning Framework Summary 
1-4 
1.4.2 
Chapter 3: Water Resources Summary 
1-5 
1.4.3 
Chapter 4: Water Master Plan Summary 
1-5 
1.4.4 
Chapter 5: Wastewater Master Plan Summary 
1-5 
1.4.5 
Chapter 6: Reclaimed Water Master Plan Summary 
1-6 
CHAPTER 2 
PLANNING FRAMEWORK 
2.1 
Introduction 
2-1 
2.2 
Water and Wastewater Service Area 
2-2 
2.2.1 
Planning Area 
2-2 
2.2.2 
Water Planning Areas 
2-4 
2.2.3 
Water and Wastewater Service Areas 
2-4 
2.2.4 
Developments 
2-5 
2.2.5 
Water Resource Classifications 
2-5 
2.3 
Land Use 
2-9 
2.3.1 
Land Use Classifications 
2-9 
2.3.2 
Unit Water Demands 
2-11 
2.3.3 
Future Development 
2-11 
2.4 
Population Estimates 
2-17 
2.5 
Historical Water Flows 
2-17 
2.5.1 
Seasonal Peaking Factors 
2-18 
2.6 
Water Demand Projections 
2-18 
2.6.1 
Demand Projection Assumptions 
2-19 
2.6.2 
Water Demands 
2-19 
2.7 
Wastewater Flow Projections 
2-21 
2.7.1 
Wastewater Flow Factors 
2-21 
2.7.2 
Wastewater Flows 
2-21 
2.8 
Reclaimed Water Flow Projections 
2-22 
2.8.1 
Reclaimed Water Flow Projection Assumptions 
2-22 
2.8.2 
Reclaimed Water Flows 
2-22 
2.9 
Flow Projections Summary 
2-23

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
ii 
CHAPTER 3 
WATER RESOURCES 
3.1 
Introduction 
3-1 
3.2 
Regulatory Framework 
3-1 
3.2.1 
Groundwater Code: 1980 Groundwater Management Act 
3-2 
3.2.2 
Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District 
3-5 
3.2.3 
Recharge, Underground Storage and Recovery, and Replenishment 
3-6 
3.2.4 
Central Arizona Project Subcontract 
3-7 
3.2.5 
Arizona Well Spacing and Well Impact Rules 
3-7 
3.2.6 
Water Reuse Regulations 
3-7 
3.2.7 
Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District 
3-9 
3.2.8 
Roosevelt Irrigation District 
3-10 
3.2.9 
Ag-to-Urban Program 
3-10 
3.3 
Water Resources Portfolio 
3-10 
3.3.1 
Groundwater 
3-10 
3.3.2 
Central Arizona Project 
3-11 
3.3.3 
Reclaimed Water 
3-13 
3.3.4 
Water Portfolio Summary 
3-14 
3.4 
Future Water Supply Opportunities 
3-14 
3.4.1 
Harquahala Groundwater Basin 
3-14 
3.4.2 
Reclaimed Water 
3-15 
3.4.3 
Roosevelt Irrigation District 
3-16 
3.4.4 
Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District 
3-16 
3.4.5 
Buckeye Waterlogged Area 
3-16 
3.4.6 
Priority 3 or 4 Colorado River Contract Water 
3-17 
3.4.7 
Verde River Sediment Mitigation Project 
3-18 
3.4.8 
Long Term Storage Credits 
3-18 
3.4.9 
Colorado River Indian Tribes Water 
3-18 
3.4.10 Partnerships 
3-18 
3.4.11 Regional Projects 
3-19 
3.5 
Designation of Assured Water Supply 
3-19 
3.5.1 
WPA 1 
3-22 
3.5.2 
WPA 2 
3-24 
3.5.3 
WPA 4A and 4B 
3-25 
3.6 
Recommendations 
3-28 
CHAPTER 4 
WATER MASTER PLAN 
4.1 
Introduction 
4-1 
4.2 
Water System Overview 
4-2 
4.2.1 
WPA Water Infrastructure Development Strategy 
4-4 
4.3 
Water System Performance Criteria 
4-7 
4.3.1 
Demand Peaking Factors 
4-7 
4.3.2 
Wells 
4-7 
4.3.3 
Pump Stations 
4-7 
4.3.4 
Water Storage 
4-8

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
iii 
4.3.5 
Transmission/Distribution Mains 
4-8 
4.3.6 
Pressures 
4-9 
4.3.7 
Fire Flows 
4-9 
4.3.8 
Performance Criteria Summary 
4-10 
4.4 
Hydraulic Model 
4-10 
4.5 
Master Plan by Water Service Area 
4-11 
4.5.1 
Sun City Festival 
4-11 
4.5.2 
Floreo at Teravalis 
4-20 
4.5.3 
Tartesso 
4-26 
4.5.4 
Central Buckeye 
4-36 
4.6 
Conclusion and Recommendations 
4-50 
CHAPTER 5 
WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN 
5.1 
Introduction 
5-1 
5.2 
Wastewater System Overview 
5-2 
5.2.1 
Wastewater Infrastructure Development Strategy 
5-4 
5.3 
Wastewater System Performance Criteria 
5-5 
5.3.1 
Gravity Sewer Main Capacity 
5-5 
5.3.2 
Lift Station Capacity 
5-6 
5.3.3 
Force Mains 
5-7 
5.3.4 
Water Reclamation Facilities 
5-7 
5.3.5 
Peaking Factors 
5-7 
5.4 
Hydraulic Model 
5-8 
5.5 
Master Plan by Wastewater Service Area 
5-8 
5.5.1 
Sun City Festival 
5-8 
5.5.2 
Floreo at Teravalis 
5-17 
5.5.3 
Tartesso 
5-23 
5.5.4 
Central Buckeye 
5-31 
5.6 
Conclusion and Recommendations 
5-56 
CHAPTER 6 
RECLAIMED WATER MASTER PLAN 
6.1 
Introduction 
6-1 
6.2 
Reclaimed System Overview 
6-1 
6.2.1 
Reclaimed Infrastructure Development Strategy 
6-2 
6.3 
Reclaimed Water Infrastructure Overview 
6-3 
6.3.1 
Reclaimed Water Management Strategies 
6-3 
6.3.2 
Reclaimed Water System Performance Criteria 
6-4 
6.4 
Master Plan by Reclaimed Service Area 
6-5 
6.4.1 
Sun City Festival 
6-5 
6.4.2 
Floreo 
6-11 
6.4.3 
Tartesso 
6-15 
6.4.4 
Central 
6-21 
6.5 
Conclusion and Recommendations 
6-32

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
iv 
Appendices 
APPENDIX 2A 
MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS FLOWS 
APPENDIX 4A 
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MODEL RESULTS 
APPENDIX 5A 
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM MODEL RESULTS 
APPENDIX 5B 
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM CAPACITY AT BUILDOUT 
APPENDIX 5C 
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FLOWS 
Tables 
Table 2.1 
General Plan Land Use Categories Mapped to City of Buckeye Land Use 
Categories for Water System Design 
2-9 
Table 2.2 
Unit Water Demands by Land Use Category 
2-11 
Table 2.3 
Population Density 
2-17 
Table 2.4 
Population Projection Table 
2-17 
Table 2.5 
2022 Water Production by Water Delivery Area 
2-17 
Table 2.6 
Water Demand Peak Flow Multipliers 
2-18 
Table 2.7 
Water Demand Projections for Future CAWS and Commercial/Industrial Areas 
by Land Use Category (mgd) 
2-19 
Table 2.8 
Water Demand Projections for Future CAWS and Commercial/Industrial Areas 
by Land Use Category (AFY) 
2-20 
Table 2.9 
Water Demand Projections by WPA (mgd) 
2-20 
Table 2.10 
Water Demand Projections by WPA (AFY) 
2-20 
Table 2.11 
Water Demand Projections with Water Conservation by WPA (mgd) 
2-21 
Table 2.12 
Water Demand Projections with Water Conservation by WPA (AFY) 
2-21 
Table 2.13 
Wastewater Flow Projections by WPA (mgd) 
2-22 
Table 2.14 
Wastewater Flow Projections by WPA (AFY) 
2-22 
Table 2.15 
Reclaimed Water Flow Projections by WPA (mgd) 
2-23 
Table 2.16 
Reclaimed Water Flow Projections by WPA (AFY) 
2-23 
Table 2.17 
Buildout Water Flows by WPAs (mgd) 
2-24 
Table 2.18 
Buildout Water Flows by WPAs (AFY) 
2-24 
Table 2.19 
Buildout Water Demand by Water Resource Category for WPAs 
2-24 
Table 2.20 
Buildout Water Demand by Water Resource Category for WPAs (AFY) 
2-25 
Table 3.1 
Arizona Regulated Wastewater Treatment Requirements for BADCT 
3-8 
Table 3.2 
Arizona Regulated Surface Water Quality Parameters by Water Designation 
3-8 
Table 3.3 
ADEQ Class A+ Reclaimed Water Quality Requirements 
3-9 
Table 3.4 
Central Arizona Project DCP Reductions 
3-12 
Table 3.5 
Buckeye Water Portfolio 
3-14 
Table 3.6 
WPA 1 Water Resources and Demand 
3-22 
Table 3.7 
WPA 1 Growth Potential 
3-23 
Table 3.8 
WPA 2 Water Resources and Demand 
3-24 
Table 3.9 
WPA 2 Growth Potential 
3-25 
Table 3.10 
WPAs 4A and 4B Water Resources and Demand 
3-26 
Table 3.11 
WPAs 4A and 4B Growth Potential 
3-27

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
v 
Table 3.12 
WPAs Growth Potential – Water Demand 
3-27 
Table 3.13 
WPAs Growth Potential – Potential Lots 
3-27 
Table 4.1 
City of Buckeye Pressure Zone Boundary Elevations 
4-9 
Table 4.2 
Performance Criteria Summary 
4-10 
Table 4.3 
Sun City Festival Wells 
4-11 
Table 4.4 
Sun City Festival Water Mains 
4-13 
Table 4.5 
Sun City Festival Demand Projections 
4-13 
Table 4.6 
Sun City Festival Water Supply Evaluation 
4-15 
Table 4.7 
Sun City Festival Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
4-16 
Table 4.8 
Sun City Festival Storage Capacity Evaluation 
4-16 
Table 4.9 
Sun City Festival Planned Infrastructure Projects 
4-19 
Table 4.10 
Floreo Demand Projections 
4-20 
Table 4.11 
Floreo Water Supply Evaluation 
4-22 
Table 4.12 
Floreo Water Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
4-22 
Table 4.13 
Floreo Water Storage Evaluation 
4-23 
Table 4.14 
Floreo Recommended Infrastructure Projects 
4-25 
Table 4.15 
Tartesso Wells 
4-26 
Table 4.16 
Tartesso Water Mains 
4-28 
Table 4.17 
Tartesso Demand Projections 
4-30 
Table 4.18 
Tartesso Water Supply Evaluation 
4-30 
Table 4.19 
Tartesso Water Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
4-31 
Table 4.20 
Tartesso Water Storage Evaluation 
4-31 
Table 4.21 
Tartesso Recommended Infrastructure Projects 
4-35 
Table 4.22 
Central Buckeye Wells 
4-36 
Table 4.23 
Central Buckeye Pump Stations 
4-37 
Table 4.24 
Central Buckeye Water Storage 
4-38 
Table 4.25 
Central Buckeye Water Mains 
4-38 
Table 4.26 
Central Buckeye Demand Projections 
4-39 
Table 4.27 
Central Buckeye Water Supply Evaluation 
4-42 
Table 4.28 
Cipriani Water Supply Evaluation 
4-43 
Table 4.29 
Central Buckeye Water Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
4-44 
Table 4.30 
Cipriani Water Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
4-44 
Table 4.31 
Central Buckeye Water Storage Evaluation 
4-45 
Table 4.32 
Cipriani Water Storage Evaluation 
4-46 
Table 4.33 
Central Buckeye Recommended Infrastructure Projects 
4-48 
Table 5.1 
Gravity Sewer Main Minimum Slope Requirements 
5-6 
Table 5.2 
Maximum Manhole Spacing 
5-6 
Table 5.3 
Population Peaking Factor 
5-7 
Table 5.4 
Sun City Festival Wastewater Collection System Gravity Sewer Main Summary 
5-10 
Table 5.5 
Sun City Festival Sewer Pipe Materials 
5-10 
Table 5.6 
Sun City Festival WRF ADMM Flow Projections 
5-14 
Table 5.7 
Sun City Festival Wastewater Infrastructure Projects 
5-16 
Table 5.8 
Floreo WRF ADMM Flow Projections 
5-19 
Table 5.9 
Floreo Wastewater Infrastructure Projects 
5-22 
Table 5.10 
Tartesso Wastewater Collection System Gravity Sewer Main Summary 
5-25

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
vi 
Table 5.11 
Tartesso WRF ADMM Flow Projections 
5-27 
Table 5.12 
Tartesso Wastewater Infrastructure Projects 
5-30 
Table 5.13 
Central Buckeye Gravity Sewer Main Summary 
5-31 
Table 5.14 
Central Buckeye Lift Station Facilities 
5-34 
Table 5.15 
Central Buckeye Lift Station Capacity Evaluation 
5-43 
Table 5.16 
Central Buckeye WRFs ADMM Flow Projections 
5-44 
Table 5.17 
Central Buckeye Wastewater Infrastructure Projects 
5-51 
Table 6.1 
Sun City Festival Reclaimed Water Pipeline Summary 
6-5 
Table 6.2 
Sun City Festival Historical Reclaimed Water Produced 
6-7 
Table 6.3 
Sun City Festival Projected Reclaimed Water Flow 
6-7 
Table 6.4 
Sun City Festival Projected Reclaimed Water Recharge Capacity Requirements 
6-8 
Table 6.5 
Sun City Festival Reclaimed Infrastructure Projects 
6-9 
Table 6.6 
Floreo Projected Reclaimed Water Production 
6-11 
Table 6.7 
Floreo Projected Reclaimed Water Capacity Requirements 
6-11 
Table 6.8 
Floreo Reclaimed Infrastructure Projects 
6-13 
Table 6.9 
Tartesso Historical Annual Flow 
6-15 
Table 6.10 
Tartesso Projected Reclaimed Water Flow 
6-15 
Table 6.11 
Tartesso Projected Reclaimed Water Capacity Requirements 
6-17 
Table 6.12 
Tartesso Reclaimed Infrastructure Projects 
6-19 
Table 6.13 
Central Buckeye Reclaimed Water Pipeline Summary 
6-22 
Table 6.14 
Central Buckeye Historical Annual Flow 
6-24 
Table 6.15 
Central Buckeye Projected Reclaimed Water Flow 
6-24 
Table 6.16 
East Central Buckeye Projected Reclaimed Water Flows 
6-27 
Table 6.17 
West Central Buckeye Projected Reclaimed Water Capacity Requirements 
6-28 
Table 6.18 
Central Buckeye Reclaimed Infrastructure Projects 
6-30 
Figures 
Figure 1.1 
Water Planning Areas and Development Planning Periods 
1-3 
Figure 2.1 
City Planning Area Boundary and Water Planning Areas 
2-3 
Figure 2.2 
City of Buckeye Developable Areas that could be Provided Water and 
Wastewater Service 
2-6 
Figure 2.3 
The City of Buckeye Master Planned Communities and Other Planned 
Developments 
2-7 
Figure 2.4 
City of Buckeye Land Areas by Water Resource Classification 
2-8 
Figure 2.5 
Land Use Categories for Developable Lands Used to Predict Water Usage 
2-10 
Figure 2.6 
Historical and Projected Population Growth 
2-12 
Figure 2.7 
2025 Estimate of Percentage Developed for Land Areas the City Classified 
as Developable 
2-13 
Figure 2.8 
2030 Estimate of Percentage Developed for Land Areas the City Classified 
as Developable 
2-14 
Figure 2.9 
2035 Estimate of Percentage Developed for Land Areas the City Classified 
as Developable 
2-15 
Figure 2.10 
2040 Estimate of Percentage Developed for Land Areas the City Classified 
as Developable 
2-16

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
vii 
Figure 2.11 
Normalized Monthly Peaking Factors 
2-18 
Figure 3.1 
Water Resources Service Area 
3-21 
Figure 4.1 
Water Planning Areas and Development Planning Periods 
4-3 
Figure 4.2 
Sun City Festival 2024 Water Distribution System 
4-12 
Figure 4.3 
Sun City Festival Development Areas 
4-14 
Figure 4.4 
Sun City Festival Recommended Water Distribution Infrastructure 
4-18 
Figure 4.5 
Floreo Development Areas 
4-21 
Figure 4.6 
Floreo Recommended Water Distribution Infrastructure 
4-24 
Figure 4.7 
Tartesso 2024 Water Distribution System 
4-27 
Figure 4.8 
Tartesso Development Areas 
4-29 
Figure 4.9 
Tartesso Recommended Pressure Reducing Valve Locations 
4-33 
Figure 4.10 
Tartesso Water Recommended Distribution Infrastructure 
4-34 
Figure 4.11 
Central Buckeye 2024 Water Distribution System 
4-40 
Figure 4.12 
Central Buckeye Development Areas 
4-41 
Figure 4.13 
Central Buckeye Recommended Water Distribution Infrastructure 
4-47 
Figure 5.1 
Water Planning Areas and Development Planning Periods 
5-3 
Figure 5.2 
Sun City Festival 2024 Wastewater Infrastructure 
5-9 
Figure 5.3 
Sun City Festival Development Areas 
5-11 
Figure 5.4 
Sun City Festival Existing Pipeline Deficiencies 
5-13 
Figure 5.5 
Sun City Festival Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
5-14 
Figure 5.6 
Sun City Festival Recommended Infrastructure Improvements through 2040 
5-15 
Figure 5.7 
Floreo Development Areas 
5-18 
Figure 5.8 
Floreo Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
5-20 
Figure 5.9 
Floreo Recommended Infrastructure Improvements through 2040 
5-21 
Figure 5.10 
Tartesso 2024 Wastewater Infrastructure 
5-24 
Figure 5.11 
Tartesso Development Areas 
5-26 
Figure 5.12 
Tartesso Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
5-28 
Figure 5.13 
Tartesso Recommended Infrastructure Improvements through 2040 
5-29 
Figure 5.14 
Central Buckeye Planned Wastewater Collection Basins 
5-32 
Figure 5.15 
Central Buckeye 2024 Wastewater Infrastructure 
5-33 
Figure 5.16 
Central Buckeye Option 1 Future Infrastructure East of SR 85 
5-36 
Figure 5.17 
Central Buckeye Option 2 Future Infrastructure East of SR 85 
5-37 
Figure 5.18 
Central Buckeye Future Infrastructure West of SR 85 
5-39 
Figure 5.19 
Central Buckeye Existing Pipeline Deficiencies 
5-41 
Figure 5.20 
Central Buckeye Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
(Option 1 East) 
5-45 
Figure 5.21 
Central Buckeye Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
(Option 2 East) 
5-46 
Figure 5.22 
Grand View WRF Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
(Option 2 East) 
5-47 
Figure 5.23 
Sundance WRF Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
5-47 
Figure 5.24 
WRF 3 Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
5-48 
Figure 5.25 
Cipriani Package Plant Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 
2040 
5-49 
Figure 5.26 
Central Buckeye Recommended Infrastructure Improvements 
5-50

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
viii 
Figure 6.1 
Sun City Festival 2024 Reclaimed Water System 
6-6 
Figure 6.2 
Sun City Festival Reclaimed Water Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
6-8 
Figure 6.3 
Sun City Festival Recommended Reclaimed Water System Infrastructure 
6-10 
Figure 6.4 
Floreo Reclaimed Water Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
6-12 
Figure 6.5 
Floreo Recommended Reclaimed Water System Infrastructure 
6-14 
Figure 6.6 
Tartesso 2024 Reclaimed Water System 
6-16 
Figure 6.7 
Tartesso Reclaimed Water Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
6-18 
Figure 6.8 
Tartesso Recommended Reclaimed Water System Infrastructure 
6-20 
Figure 6.9 
Central Buckeye 2024 Reclaimed Water Infrastructure 
6-23 
Figure 6.10 
Central Buckeye Planned Wastewater Collection Basins 
6-25 
Figure 6.11 
East Central Buckeye Reclaimed Water Recharge Facility Capacity through 
2040 
6-27 
Figure 6.12 
West Central Buckeye Reclaimed Water Recharge Capacity through 2040 
6-28 
Figure 6.13 
Central Buckeye Option 1 Recommended Reclaimed Water System 
Infrastructure 
6-29

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
ix 
Abbreviations 
A2U 
Ag-to-Urban 
A&Ww 
aquatic and wildlife, warm water 
A.A.C. 
Arizona Administrative Code 
A.R.S. 
Arizona Revised Statute 
AADF 
average annual daily flow 
AAWS 
Analysis of Assured Water Supply 
ADAWS 
Alternative Designation of Assured Water Supply 
ADD 
average day demands 
ADEQ 
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 
ADMM 
average day maximum monthly 
ADWR 
Arizona Department of Water Resources 
AF 
acre-feet 
AFY 
acre-feet per year 
Agl 
agricultural irrigation 
AgL 
agricultural livestock watering 
AMA 
Active Management Area 
AOHI 
area of hydrologic impact 
APS 
Arizona Public Service 
AS&R 
annual storage and recovery 
ASR 
aquifer storage and recovery 
AWP 
advanced water purification 
AWS 
Assured Water Supply 
AZPDES 
Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 
BADCT 
Best Available Demonstrated Control Technology 
BOD5 
5-day biochemical oxygen demand 
BPS 
booster pump station 
BWCDD 
Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District 
BWLA 
Buckeye Waterlogged Area 
CAGRD 
Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District 
CAP 
Central Arizona Project 
capita/DU 
capita per dwelling unit 
CAWCD 
Central Arizona Water Conservation District 
CAWS 
Certificate of Assured Water Supply 
CBOD5 
5-day carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand 
CDP 
Drought Contingency Plan 
CFU 
colony forming unit 
CIP 
Capital Improvement Program 
City 
City of Buckeye

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
x 
CRIT 
Colorado River Indian Tribes 
d 
depth of flow 
D 
diameter (pipe) 
DAWS 
Designation of Assured Water Supply 
DOI 
Department of the Interior 
DPR 
direct potable reuse 
DU/ac 
dwelling units per acre 
E. coli 
Escherichia coli 
EC 
extinguishment credit 
EDS 
Engineering Design Standards 
FBC 
full-body contact 
Floreo 
Floreo at Teravalis 
fps 
feet per second 
ft/ft 
foot per foot 
GIS 
geographic information system 
GMA 
1980 Groundwater Management Act 
gpd/ac 
gallons per day per acre 
gpm 
gallons per minute 
GSF 
groundwater savings facility 
GST 
ground storage tank 
HGL 
hydraulic grade line 
I-10 
Interstate-10 
ID 
identification 
IGFR 
irrigation grandfathered rights 
INA 
Irrigation Non-expansion Area 
IPR 
indirect potable reuse 
IWMP 
Integrated Water Master Plan 
LTSC 
long-term storage credit 
M&I 
municipal and industrial 
MBR 
membrane bioreactor 
MC 
Maricopa County 
MCL 
maximum contaminant level 
MDD 
maximum day demand 
MG 
million gallons 
mg/L 
milligrams per liter 
mgd 
million gallons per day 
mL 
milliliter 
MWD 
Maricopa Water District 
NCS 
new conservation space 
NIA 
Non-Indian Agriculture

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
xi 
No. 
number 
NPR 
non-potable reuse 
NTU 
nephelometric turbidity unit 
PF 
peaking factor 
pH 
potential of hydrogen 
PHD 
peak hour demand 
ppm 
parts per million 
PRV 
pressure reducing valve 
psi 
pounds per square inch 
PVC 
polyvinyl chloride 
Qty 
quantity 
RID 
Roosevelt Irrigation District 
RO 
reverse osmosis 
RWMP 
Reclaimed Water Master Plan 
SR 85 
State Route 85 
SRP 
Salt River Project 
SSO 
sanitary sewer overflow 
SWTP 
surface water treatment plant 
TAG 
Technical Advisory Group 
TBD 
to be determined 
TDS 
total dissolved solids 
TOC 
total organic carbon 
TSS 
total suspended solids 
USBR 
United States Bureau of Reclamation 
USF 
underground storage facility 
UWSR 
Underground Water Storage and Recovery 
UWSRA 
Underground Water Storage and Recovery Act 
WMP 
Water Master Plan 
WPA 
water planning area 
WRF 
water reclamation facility 
WRMP 
Water Resources Master Plan 
WS 
Water Storage 
WTF 
water treatment facility 
WTP 
water treatment plant 
WWMP 
Wastewater Master Plan 
WWTF 
wastewater treatment facility

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
1-1 
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 
1.1 
Overview 
The City of Buckeye (City) currently has a population of approximately 124,000 people and is one of the 
fastest-growing cities in the United States. Located on the western edge of Maricopa County, Arizona, the 
land is plentiful, and the cost of living is less than many other areas in Maricopa making Buckeye an 
attractive City for development. To support this growth, the City continues to plan the water resources 
and water-related infrastructure needed to serve this growing community. 
The City initiated the 2025 Integrated Water Master Plan (IWMP) to proactively plan the water resources, 
water, wastewater, and reclaimed water infrastructure needed to support existing customers and new 
development. The IWMP does not replace engineering design in compliance with the Buckeye 
Engineering Design Standards and code requirements. 
1.2 
Previous Studies 
1.2.1 
2017 Integrated Water Master Plan 
The City completed the 2017 IWMP in 2017. The 2017 IWMP was for Central Buckeye only and 
accomplished the following key objectives that set the groundwork for the water and wastewater 
infrastructure required to help the City transition to a larger community. This planning provided the 
groundwork for the current 2025 IWMP: 
1. The City had recently acquired the Valencia private water company that served Central Buckeye. This 
utility acquisition enabled the City to combine its water delivery system with the Valencia water 
system and, thereby, create a stronger water delivery system. This combined system can be expanded 
to more reliably serve Central Buckeye customers while making water quality improvements. 
2. Water service areas were defined to include regional well treatment facilities served by multiple wells. 
This strategy helped the City transition from infrastructure constructed to serve specific developments 
with limited ability to expand to a more regional approach with fewer, larger facilities that are easier 
to expand, operate, and maintain. 
3. Wastewater collection basins were defined with wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs) that serve 
larger areas to move away from WWTFs planned to serve specific developments. This strategy helps 
the City to ultimately have fewer WWTFs to operate and maintain.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
1-2 
1.2.2 
2020 Water Resources Master Plan 
The City's 2020 Water Resources Master Plan (WRMP) provided the following recommendations: 
1. Developed water policy recommendations to assist the City to maximize the benefit of existing water 
resources and begin preparing for a Designation of Assured Water Supply (DAWS). 
2. Identified the potential water resources that the City could acquire to build a water resources portfolio 
that would make it possible to obtain a DAWS. 
3. Developed concepts to fully utilize reclaimed water produced in the City and to use brackish 
groundwater in the Buckeye waterlogged area. 
1.3 
IWMP Purpose 
The 2025 IWMP builds upon previous reports to plan the water resources, water, wastewater, and 
reclaimed water infrastructure needed for the City to grow through 2040. This is an integrated plan that 
uses a common set of assumptions and flow projections upon which the entire plan is based. This 
common set of assumptions includes a definition of the service area, growth rate, timing of development, 
population growth, and flow projections. The 2025 IWMP considers the water cycle as water moves 
through the water, wastewater, and reclaimed water systems so the volume of reclaimed water produced 
is planned as an essential component of the City's water resource portfolio. 
The 2025 IWMP study area for this IWMP is split into water planning areas (WPAs) 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, and 5. 
These WPAs cover a total of 432 square miles. Within the WPAs, the IWMP identifies infrastructure for the 
Central Buckeye, Tartesso, Sun City Festival, and Floreo at Teravalis developments. Figure 1.1 shows the 
WPA coverage and the projected development areas through 2040 and beyond. 
The 2025 IWMP establishes the road map for future infrastructure needs including treatment, conveyance, 
storage, and pumping. Capital improvement projects will be established for growth areas across the City 
for each of the planning periods in the 2025 IWMP (2030, 2035, 2040). 
The 2025 IWMP occurs at a unique and critical time for the City because the Arizona Department of Water 
Resources (ADWR) recently stopped recognizing groundwater allocations that have been reserved by 
developments that have previously obtained an Analysis of Assured Water Supply (AAWS). This decision 
will require the City to look elsewhere for the water supplies needed to grow beyond the Certificate/s of 
Assured Water Supply (CAWS) already obtained by developments in Buckeye and developments on less 
than six parcels. However, changes to the process of obtaining a DAWS are being proposed to assist cities 
like Buckeye in obtaining a DAWS. This process is called an Alternative DAWS (ADAWS). The City is 
currently in the process of obtaining an ADAWS for a portion of the City. Once approved, this change 
could significantly change the location and timing of growth in the proposed ADAWS area. 
In 2025, the Arizona Legislature passed a bill that allows water currently being used for agriculture to be 
transferred to the City for municipal use if certain provisions are followed. This legislation is called the Ag 
to Urban program. Over time, this legislation is expected to make significant changes to the City’s water 
resources strategy in Central Buckeye that is not yet currently established.

ntersburg
74
Circle City
Wittmann
Morristown
10
10
Dixie
Allenville
Palo Verde
Buckeye
60
Liberty
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
WPA 1
WPA 3
WPA 5
WPA 2
WPA 4A
WPA 4B
Festival
Ranch
Festival
Ranch
Teravalis
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
North Star
Ranch
Farallon
WTP 5
WTP 11
Westpark WTP
Floreo WTP
Tartesso WTP
Cipriani WTP
Sun City
Festival WTP
Grand
View WTP
Sundance
North Airport
Jackie A.
Meck WC
Last Revised: October 29, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
2025 BUCKEYE INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 1.1  Water Planning Areas and Development Planning Periods
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning Area
3
Q
Water Campus or WTP
3
Q
Proposed WTP
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community
Tartesso West
Elianto
West Phoenix Estates
Sun Valley South
Buckeye Canal
RID Canal

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
1-4 
Future infrastructure required under the DAWS water resource legal framework will have some 
fundamental differences from the types of infrastructure that developers have constructed for the City 
previously. The 2025 IWMP will address these changes. The changes to infrastructure planning include the 
following: 
1. Water infrastructure within a DAWS area should be interconnected so water supplies for a DAWS can 
reach all customers in the DAWS area. 
2. The City will own water resources instead of individual developments through a CAWS. Therefore, 
water supply infrastructure will not be sized for specific developments. Instead, infrastructure will be 
larger and serve more regional areas with multiple developments. 
3. Surface water treatment facilities (WTFs) may be needed to treat surface water supplies that the City 
acquires in the future. Although surface WTFs are not planned before 2040, the City will not rely 
completely on wells for its water supply beyond 2040. Where appropriate, water infrastructure has 
been planned for use with a future surface WTF near the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal. WTFs 
along the Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID) and Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage 
District (BWCDD) canals are beyond the planning periods of this master plan 
4. Gravity sewer basins have been defined to identify the areas that each water reclamation facility (WRF) 
will serve. 
5. Infrastructure to fully use reclaimed water will be required so that the City can use all reclaimed water 
as an important part of the City's water resources portfolio. 
1.4 
Report Organization 
Chapters in this report are organized as follows: 
 
Chapter 1: Introduction. 
 
Chapter 2: Planning Framework. 
 
Chapter 3: Water Resources. 
 
Chapter 4: Water Master Plan. 
 
Chapter 5: Wastewater Master Plan. 
 
Chapter 6: Reclaimed Water Master Plan. 
1.4.1 
Chapter 2: Planning Framework Summary 
The Planning Framework contains the key assumptions upon which the 2025 IWMP is based. First the 
planning areas are defined, which include water planning areas and wastewater service areas, and the 
service areas of Master Planned and other developments. The land areas are then classified according to 
water resource availability. 
Once the planning areas are defined, the information used to develop flow projections is presented. This 
information includes land use classifications, unit flows, timing of future development, and historical flow 
information. This information contains key assumptions used to establish flow projections. 
Finally, the flow projections are presented in this chapter. Flows by water planning areas are calculated for 
the 2030, 2035, and 2040 planning periods in the Master Plan for water, wastewater, and reclaimed water

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
1-5 
systems. These flows are distributed spatially across the service area to be allocated in the hydraulic 
models used to plan infrastructure. 
1.4.2 
Chapter 3: Water Resources Summary 
The water resources chapter contains a summary of the water resource regulations that apply to the City, 
including the 1980 Groundwater Management Act (GMA), and the regulations that apply to each of the 
water supplies that the City might use, so that the plan is prepared in a way that complies with these 
regulations. 
The City's water resource portfolio is then described to provide a clear understanding of the water supply 
constraints and opportunities that are available with the City's current portfolio. These water supplies 
include groundwater, surface water, and reclaimed water. 
Future water supply opportunities are identified for planning how to supply future demands, including the 
Ag to Urban program. 
A key outcome of the water resource evaluation is planning for a future DAWS in one or more areas of the 
City. Water supply planning for Water Planning Areas 1, 2, 3, 4A, and 4B are contained in the water 
resources chapter. 
Recommended actions for the City to take to continue building a water resources portfolio are presented 
in this chapter. 
1.4.3 
Chapter 4: Water Master Plan Summary 
The Water Master Plan (WMP) is a water infrastructure plan for each of the water service areas: Sun City 
Festival, Floreo at Teravais, Tartesso, and Central Buckeye. Water infrastructure capacity is evaluated 
against the City's water performance criteria using a hydraulic model. Then future infrastructure is sized to 
deliver projected water demand to planned development that satisfies the performance criteria. Water 
supplies will be from groundwater through 2040. Where needed, treatment for arsenic is included, along 
with the storage, pumping, and transmission mains.  
The City will determine which projects will be funded by developers and which projects will be paid from 
the City's capital improvement program (CIP). The timing of recommended infrastructure is established 
with a trigger-based approach. 
1.4.4 
Chapter 5: Wastewater Master Plan Summary 
The Wastewater Master Plan (WWMP) identifies the service areas for each of the City's planned WRFs so 
that the future treatment capacity requirements can be established. Available capacities in gravity sewer 
mains are evaluated for current 2025 flows using the City's performance criteria and the hydraulic model 
to determine if the mains have capacity for additional development. Gravity sewers, lift stations, and force 
mains have been planned to convey the projected wastewater in each of the planning periods. Capital 
projects are identified in each of the planning periods. Gravity sewer pipes have been sized assuming 
buildout occurs. 
The City will determine which capital projects will be funded by developers and which projects will be 
funded by the City's CIP. Triggers are defined for capital projects so that the timing of the projects can be 
adjusted in the future if the rate and timing of growth change.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
1-6 
1.4.5 
Chapter 6: Reclaimed Water Master Plan Summary 
The Reclaimed Water Master Plan (RWMP) identifies the infrastructure needed by the City to fully benefit 
from the reclaimed water produced at each WRF. This plan includes additional reclaimed water pipelines, 
pump stations, aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells, and recharge basins. The locations of proposed 
recharge facilities are planned to maximize the benefit to the City's water resource portfolio through ASR 
to obtain groundwater credits. Where possible, groundwater recharge facilities are located to maximize 
the groundwater credits that can be obtained from the groundwater recharge.  
Capital projects have been identified in each planning period, with triggers that allow the project timing 
to be adjusted if the timing of growth changes.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-1 
CHAPTER 2 PLANNING FRAMEWORK 
2.1 
Introduction 
An IWMP requires a common set of assumptions upon which the plan for water resources, water 
infrastructure, wastewater infrastructure, and reclaimed water infrastructure is based. This common set of 
assumptions includes a definition of the service area, growth rate, timing of development, population 
growth, and flow projections for water, wastewater, and reclaimed water systems. An IWMP considers the 
water cycle as water moves through the water resource, water, wastewater, and reclaimed water systems 
so that the amount of reclaimed water that is produced is correctly estimated as a water resource for 
water resource planning within the Master Plan. 
An IWMP also uses the same set of assumptions on the timing and location of development for all 
components of the plan so capital improvement recommendations are coordinated between the water, 
wastewater, and reclaimed water systems. This Master Plan update will set the road map for future 
infrastructure needs and line sizing, as well as identify any needed capital improvement projects. 
The IWMP planning framework defines the water resource requirements, water, wastewater, and 
reclaimed water flow projections for the 2030, 2035, 2040, and buildout planning periods. 
The City is unique in its approach to development planning and this planning framework considers the 
City's needs in the following ways: 
1. The City covers a very large land area with room to grow for many years. Rather than considering the 
entire developable area within the City, only the land areas that could develop in the planning periods 
of this Master Plan are considered. 
2. By relying solely on groundwater and without having a DAWS, the City has relied primarily on 
developers obtaining CAWS from the ADWR. With the State of Arizona placing holds on all new 
CAWS in the Phoenix Active Management Area (AMA), current development less than 10 years is 
focused on developments with a CAWS or development with less than 6 lots that do not require a 
CAWS. This type of development generally consists of commercial, industrial, or multi-family units. In 
this plan, lands that do not have a CAWS and, therefore, would need a DAWS are phased in planning 
periods beyond 10 years. 
3. The City is pursuing an ADAWS, and recently the Arizona Legislature passed a law that adds an Ag to 
Urban water supply conversion. These two strategies for providing water resources for development 
will likely expand the land areas that could develop within the time period of this IWMP. 
4. The City has development agreements for a number of Master Planned communities. These Master 
Planned communities are included in the flow projections, but if a CAWS has not already been 
established, then these Master Planned communities would need to be in a DAWS to develop.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-2 
5. The City is working to obtain a DAWS in one or more portions of the City, so flow projections are 
grouped into geographical areas where a DAWS could be obtained. Each of these geographical 
areas includes all the developable land, including lands with a CAWS and commercial/industrial/ 
multi-family/grandfathered development within the geographical area. 
6. Generally, cities and other water/wastewater utilities have a built-in safety factor to allow for abnormal 
peak flows as well as allowing some redundancy/backup in nearby mains should an abnormal event 
occur. Therefore, the unit demand and flow factors in the City's design criteria are more conservative 
and are used to size pipelines. 
This planning framework chapter includes the following major sections: 
 
Water and Wastewater Service Area. 
 
Land Use. 
 
Population Estimates. 
 
Historical Water Flows. 
 
Water Demand Projections. 
 
Wastewater Flow Projections. 
 
Reclaimed Water Projections. 
 
Flow Projections Summary. 
2.2 
Water and Wastewater Service Area 
2.2.1 
Planning Area 
The City's planning area is located west of Goodyear, Arizona, and east of Tonopah and has a land area of 
639 square miles. The City's planning area includes lands north and south of the Gila River. North and 
south of Interstate 10 (I-10), and north and south of the CAP canal. Land areas south of the Gila River 
currently have no development plans or an identified water supply so this area has been excluded from 
the 2025 IWMP. See Figure 2.1 for the City's planning area.

WPA 1
WPA 3
WPA 5
WPA 2
WPA 4A
WPA 4B
Last Revised: October 28, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
4
2
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 2.1 City Planning Area Boundary and Water Planning Areas 
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning
Area
Buckeye Planning
Area

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-4 
2.2.2 
Water Planning Areas 
To facilitate planning for a future DAWS in one or more areas of the City, the City's planning area is 
subdivided into seven WPAs based on the potential water supplies available to serve each area. Flow 
projections were established for each planning area. The reason for each WPA designation is provided 
below: 
1. Water Planning Area 1: Area 1 includes the northernmost part of the City. This area will most likely 
receive water through the CAP canal from sources that include the Harquahala groundwater basin. 
Area 1 includes the Sun City Festival development and Floreo, at Teravalis. 
2. Water Planning Area 2: Area 2 is located north of I-10 on the western part of the City. Area 2 could 
receive water through the CAP canal, a possible pipeline from the Harquahala groundwater basin, or 
from Central Buckeye. Area 2 includes the Tartesso and West Phoenix Estates developments. 
3. Water Planning Area 3: Area 3 is located between I-10 and the Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID) 
canal and includes lands east of the Hassayampa River basin and west of the RID and Buckeye Water 
Conservation and Drainage District (BWCDD) canal. Area 3 is currently served by groundwater wells. A 
portion of Area 3 is served by Arizona Water Company, and wastewater from this area is delivered to 
Buckeye. 
4. Water Planning Area 4A: Area 4A is the land area currently served by the RID canal for irrigation. 
Area 4A is currently supplied by groundwater but, in the future, could be served by surface water off 
the RID canal. 
5. Water Planning Area 4B: Area 4B is the land area currently served by the BWCDD canal for irrigation 
between the canal and the Gila River. Area 4B is currently served with groundwater and in the future 
could be served by surface water off the BWCDD canal. 
6. Water Planning Area 5: Area 5 is located north of Area 3 and east of Area 2 on the Northeast of the 
City's planning area. A portion of Area 5 includes the Verrado development, which is supplied by 
EPCOR, a private water utility. The eastern portion of Area 5 is in the City's wastewater service area but 
not the water service area because it is served by the Arizona Water Company. A DAWS is not planned 
for Area 5. 
7. Water Planning Area 6: Area 6 is located south of the Gila River, where no development is planned, 
and there is no strategy to obtain water resources for this area. The City has no current plans to obtain 
a DAWS in Area 6. 
Figure 2.1 presents the City's WPAs. 
2.2.3 
Water and Wastewater Service Areas 
Not all the City's land areas are planned for development in the planning periods of the IWMP. The City 
has identified land areas that could develop in the foreseeable future, and these land areas were identified 
in a geographic information system (GIS) layer. These land areas planned for future development, plus the 
land areas already developed are the land areas that have been Master Planned in this study.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-5 
The City's water service area includes developable lands, except for the Verrado and Sienna Hills 
developments, which are served by EPCOR. Lands east of Verrado to the City planning boundary receive 
water services from Arizona Water Company. The City provides wastewater services to the land area 
between Verrado and the City's eastern planning boundary, except for one half-mile strip of land along 
the City's eastern boundary between 91st Avenue and Perryville Road from Indian School Road to Peoria 
Avenue that is served by Liberty Utilities, Inc. The undeveloped land areas that the City plans to provide 
water and wastewater services are presented in Figure 2.2. In the figure, the water service area is defined 
as land areas that could develop and would be served water by the City. The wastewater service area 
includes the lands where the City provides water service plus land on the eastern side of the City where 
the City provides wastewater service, but other providers provide water service. 
2.2.4 
Developments 
The City has 35 Master Planned communities that have development agreements in place. These Master 
Planned communities are currently listed on the City's website1 and are presented in Figure 2.3. 
In addition to the Master Planned communities, the City has a number of existing and planned 
developments that are also presented in Figure 2.3. 
2.2.5 
Water Resource Classifications 
The City's land areas planned for development are grouped according to whether the land has a water 
resource that makes development possible. Grouping land areas according to water resource availability is 
important to quantify demands for land areas for which a water resource is already obtained and land 
areas that need to obtain a water resource before developing. The following categories are used to 
classify lands according to water resource availability: 
1. Grandfathered: Grandfathered land areas are existing developments that were developed before 
1995 when the rules for the 1980 GMA became effective. 
2. CAWS Not Required: Developments where land is subdivided into less than six parcels do not 
require a CAWS. Industrial and commercial developments1 often fit into this category. These lands can 
use groundwater without replenishment while not under a DAWS. 
3. Developed: Land areas with a CAWS that are already fully developed. 
4. Developing: Land areas with a CAWS that are developing but not developed by 2023. 
5. Undeveloped: Land Areas with a CAWS but have not started developing by 2023. 
6. No Water Source: Undeveloped land areas that do not have a CAWS. These land areas need a water 
source other than groundwater to develop if the development is to be a subdivision with more than 
six lots. Currently lands designated as No Water Source include lands that could participate in the Ag 
to Urban program. 
Figure 2.4 shows the City's developable land areas by water resource availability.  
 
 
1 https://www.buckeyeaz.gov/business/development-services/planning-zoning/documents

Last Revised: October 28, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 2.2 City of Buckeye Developable Areas that could be Provided Water and Wastewater Service
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning
Area
Wastewater Service
Area
Water and
Wastewater Service
Area

burg
74
Circle City
Wittmann
Morristown
10
10
Dixie
Allenville
Palo Verde
Buckeye
60
Liberty
16
26
5
34
23
27
28
7
9
19
8
29
11
32
17
22
24
6
33
2
31
30
4
3
21
15
18
13
25
10
12
20
14
1
Last Revised: October 28, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch03\
O
0
5
2.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this figure are for planning purposes and represent
 approximate locations. Engineering and/or survey accuracy is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 2.3 The City of Buckeye Master Planned Communities and Other Planned Developments
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Buckeye Planning Area
DevelopmentName
1 - Algodon
2 - Blue Horizons
3 - Buckeye 252
4 - Cipriani
5 - Copper Falls
6 - Desert Creek
7 - Elianto
8 - Festival Ranch
9 - Floreo at Terravalis
10 - Former Cemex Sand
and Gravel Quarry
11 - Henry Park
12 - Jackrabbit Crossing
13 - Marwest
14 - Mayfield
15 - Miller Crossings
16 - Monte Verde
17 - Montiere
18 - Mountain View
Business Center
19 - North Star Ranch
20 - Paloma Vista
21 - Parkman Ranch
22 - Sienna Hills
23 - Silver Rock
24 - Sun Valley South
25 - Sun Valley Villages I
and II
26 - Sundance
27 - Tartesso
28 - Tartesso West
29 - Teravalis
30 - Valle Del Rio
31 - Valle Del Sol
32 - Verrado
33 - Westpark
34 - Westwind
Other Planned
Developments, Outside of
MPCs

Last Revised: October 27, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 2.4 City of Buckeye Land Areas by Water Resource Classification
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning
Area
Water Resource
Classification
CAWS but not
developed
Developed
Developing
Grandfathered
CAWS not required
No water resource

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-9 
2.3 
Land Use 
2.3.1 
Land Use Classifications 
Land areas that receive or may receive water and wastewater services have been assigned a land use 
classification that is useful to predict water use. Land use classifications are used to estimate current water 
use when customer billing data is correlated to existing customers. Then, once a unit water demand per 
acre for each land use category is established, this unit water demand can be used to predict future water 
use in undeveloped lands. This approach assumes that current water use patterns are predictive of future 
water use in undeveloped lands with similar types of development. 
Actual water use may be less than projected water use in newer developments with limited turf areas and 
improved water saving fixtures. Currently there are many developments that use less water than the 
project demand in their CAWS certificate. However, water demands in this IWMP for water resource 
planning are projected at the level needed for a CAWS certificate. Unit demands for infrastructure sizing 
follow the City's design standards. 
Land use classifications for specific developments were determined by reviewing the following data 
sources: 
1. Aerial photography, for developed lands. 
2. Development reports when available. 
3. City of Buckeye General Plan Land Use GIS data layer. 
The land use categories in the General Plan are more general than the land use categories in the City's 
design standards. Therefore, the General Plan land use categories were mapped to the land use categories 
in the City's design standards, which contain the land use categories used in the IWMP. To use the 
residential land use categories, residential land areas needed to be assigned a housing density per acre. 
For platted land areas, the number of houses per acre within developments was obtained by using the 
City's parcel layer to determine the number of parcels per acre. Table 2.1 presents the correlation between 
land use categories in the General Plan and the City's water design standards. Figure 2.5 presents the land 
use categories that are assigned to lands to predict water use. 
Table 2.1 
General Plan Land Use Categories Mapped to City of Buckeye Land Use Categories for Water System Design 
General Plan Land Use Category 
Design Criteria Land Use Category 
Rural 
Low Density 
Neighborhood, Master Planned Community 
Medium Density  
Active Adult  
High Density  
Business Commerce 
Commercial/Mixed Use Master Planning 
Activity Center, Employment 
Industrial Master Planning 
School Master Planning 
Turf 
Developed Open Space (non-turf areas)/Public Right-of-Way

Last Revised: October 27, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 2.5 Land Use Categories for Developable Lands Used to Predict Water Usage
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Land Use
Commercial
High Density
Residential
Industrial
Low Density
Residential
Medium Density
Residential
Open Space
Turf
No Water Use
Water Planning
Area

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-11 
2.3.2 
Unit Water Demands 
Unit water demands for water resources planning were established by linking billed customer water use to 
the land use GIS layer to obtain a water use per acre by land use classification. Where customer billing 
data was not available for some land use categories, representative unit demand values were obtained 
from other Maricopa County communities. Flows from developments with a given equivalent number of 
dwelling units at buildout were calculated using 94 gallons per person per day. Table 2.2 presents the unit 
water demands used to develop flow projections in Chapter 2 for the water resources needed for future 
development. 
Flow estimates for sizing water and wastewater pipes will use the City's 2025 Engineering Design 
Standards (EDS) located on the City's website. 
Table 2.2 
Unit Water Demands by Land Use Category 
Design Criteria Land Use Category 
Abbreviation 
Unit Water Demand 
(gpd/ac) 
Low Density 
LDR 
602 
Medium Density 
MDR 
1,354 
Active Adult 
AA 
1,504 
High Density 
HDR 
2,820 
Commercial/Mixed Use Master Planning 
COM 
1,550 
Industrial Master Planning 
IDU 
880 
School Master Planning 
SCH 
1,065 
Turf 
TUR 
2,900 
Developed Open Space (non-turf areas)/Public Right-of-Way 
OS 
0 
gpd/ac - gallons per day per acre 
2.3.3 
Future Development 
Based on population recorded by the United States Census Bureau, the City's annual average growth for 
the past 10 years (2012 through 2022) was 7 percent. However, a growth rate of 7 percent is more rapid 
than can be expected over the long term, especially since a constant annual growth rate percentage is 
exponential, resulting in very rapid growth. Figure 2.6 shows the annual population growth (1990 to 2022). 
In the next 20 years, the percentage growth rate is expected to decrease as the City becomes bigger. The 
growth rate differs for each planning area of the City. Central Buckeye is expected to grow faster than the 
other planning areas in the next 10 years as developments begin to come in along Arizona State Route 85. 
The Floreo at Teravalis (Floreo) development is currently in development. Only developments that have a 
CAWS or are zoned for nonresidential are planned to develop prior to 2040.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-12 
 
Figure 2.6 
Historical and Projected Population Growth 
The location where growth will occur is currently dependent on water resource factors. In 2023, ADWR 
concluded that the West Salt River Valley and Hassayampa aquifers will be overdrawn within the next 
100 years, so new developments that do not already have groundwater allocation will need to rely on 
renewable water supplies rather than groundwater. New development can only occur on lands that 
already have a CAWS until a water supply is obtained for the remaining lands. Developments with six or 
fewer lots can still develop without a CAWS or DAWS. The City currently has 24,400 acres of land that 
have a CAWS, so these lands can still develop. The Ag to Urban water supply may influence the timing 
and location of new development. 
Land areas were identified to develop in each of the planning periods of this Master Plan. Land areas with 
a CAWS were assumed to develop first. As these land areas became fully developed, later planning 
periods included development on lands that currently have no water resource, with the assumption that 
provisions are being made for additional water supplies. The status of development in each planning 
period is presented graphically to visualize the rate and location of development. Figure 2.7 presents the 
current development in 2025. Figure 2.8 presents the anticipated percentage developed in 2030. 
Figure 2.9 presents the anticipated percentage developed in 2035. Figure 2.10 presents the anticipated 
percentage developed in 2040.  
 
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Population
Year
Historical Population
Projected Population

rsburg
74
Circle City
Wittmann
Morristown
10
10
Dixie
Allenville
Palo Verde
Buckeye
60
Liberty
WPA 1
WPA 3
WPA 5
WPA 2
WPA 4A
WPA 4B
Last Revised: October 28, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 2.7 2025 Estimate of Percentage Developed for Land Areas the City Classified as Developable
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning
Area
2025 Percent
Developed
0%
≤ 25%
26% - 50%
51% - 75%
76% - 100%

rsburg
74
Circle City
Wittmann
Morristown
10
10
Dixie
Allenville
Palo Verde
Buckeye
60
Liberty
WPA 1
WPA 3
WPA 5
WPA 2
WPA 4A
WPA 4B
Last Revised: October 28, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 2.8 2030 Estimate of Percentage Developed for Land Areas the City Classified as Developable
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning
Area
2030 Percent
Developed
0
≤ 25%
26% - 50%
51% - 75%
76% - 100%

rsburg
74
Circle City
Wittmann
Morristown
10
10
Dixie
Allenville
Palo Verde
Buckeye
60
Liberty
WPA 1
WPA 3
WPA 5
WPA 2
WPA 4A
WPA 4B
Last Revised: October 28, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 2.9 2035 Estimate of Percentage Developed for Land Areas the City Classified as Developable
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning
Area
2035 Percent
Developed
0%
≤ 25%
26% - 50%
51% - 75%
76% - 100%

ersburg
74
Circle City
Wittmann
Morristown
10
10
Dixie
Allenville
Palo Verde
Buckeye
60
Liberty
WPA 1
WPA 3
WPA 5
WPA 2
WPA 4A
WPA 4B
Last Revised: October 28, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 2.10 2040 Estimate of Percentage Developed for Land Areas the City Classified as Developable
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning
Area
2040 Percent
Developed
0%
≤ 25%
26% - 50%
51% - 75%
76% - 100%

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-17 
2.4 
Population Estimates 
Population projections rely on housing density and population density data derived from the City's design 
criteria. Table 2.3 presents the population density for the population calculation. Table 2.4 presents the 
projected population for each planning year in the City's development area. 
Table 2.3 
Population Density 
Zoning District 
Land Use Category 
Abbreviation 
Average Housing 
Density (DU/ac) 
Population Density 
(capita/DU) 
Residential 
Low Density 
LDR 
2 
3.2 
Medium Density 
MDR 
4.5 
3.2 
Active Adult 
AA 
8.0 
2.0 
High Density 
HDR 
12.0 
2.5 
DU/ac - dwelling units per acre; capita/DU - capita per dwelling unit 
Table 2.4 
Population Projection Table 
WPA 
2025 Population 
2030 Population 
2035 Population 
2040 Population 
Buildout Population 
1 
18,286 
24,000 
27,000 
33,000 
561,000 
2 
14,857 
17,000 
21,000 
25,000 
314,000 
3 
49,000 
74,000 
84,000 
92,000 
205,000 
4A 
23,000 
33,000 
38,000 
41,000 
157,000 
4B 
7,857 
10,000 
11,000 
11,000 
136,000 
5 
10,857 
13,000 
13,000 
13,000 
31,000 
Total 
123,857 
171,000 
194,000 
215,000 
1,404,000 
2.5 
Historical Water Flows 
Historical water production data is useful in preparing future demand projections because this data 
provides the starting point for future projections. Historical flows are also used to create the following 
information: 
 
Seasonal demand peaking factors. 
 
Non-revenue water estimates. 
The City has four hydraulically separate water distribution systems that are supplied by wells. Table 2.5 
presents the 2022 water supply from wells in each of the water delivery areas. The City operates an 
additional three very small, hydraulically separate water distribution systems that are not expected to 
change significantly and are therefore not included in this analysis. 
Table 2.5 
2022 Water Production by Water Delivery Area 
WPA 
Service Area 
Annual Average Water Production (mgd) 
WPA 1 
Sun City Festival 
1.54 
WPA 2 
West Phoenix Estates 
0.16 
WPA 2 
Tartesso 
1.24 
WPA 3, 4A, and 4B 
Central Buckeye 
6.90 
Total 
 
9.84 
mgd - million gallons per day

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-18 
2.5.1 
Seasonal Peaking Factors 
Figure 2.11 presents the monthly peaking factors created by normalizing water production for the 
four water distribution systems in the City: Central Buckeye, Tartesso, Sun City Festival, and Sun Valley 
Estates. Tartesso has a higher peaking factor, presumably because this area has more turf irrigation. The 
monthly peaking factor for three areas is approximately 1.3. Maximum daily peaking factors are usually 
15 to 25 percent higher than the maximum monthly peaking factor. Table 2.6 presents the maximum day 
and peak hour peaking factors in the City's design criteria. The City's peaking factor for maximum day 
demands is conservative and will be used in the IWMP. 
 
Figure 2.11 
Normalized Monthly Peaking Factors 
Table 2.6 
Water Demand Peak Flow Multipliers 
 
Peaking Factor 
Water Demand Maximum Day/Average Day Peaking Factor 
1.8 
Water Demand Peak Hour/Water Demand Average Day Peaking Factor 
3.0 
2.6 
Water Demand Projections 
The future planning periods established for the IWMP are years 2030, 2035, and 2040. Using the data and 
assumptions described in earlier sections, flow projections have been calculated for water demand and 
supply planning. Flow projection calculations differ from the 2017 IWMP since different assumptions were 
made in that plan. This report includes unit water demands using billed customer water use for water 
resource and treatment capacity planning. The City's EDS unit demands, which are more conservative, are 
used for pipeline sizing. 
Jan      Feb     Mar      Apr      May     June     July      Aug    Sept      Oct      Nov     Dec

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-19 
2.6.1 
Demand Projection Assumptions 
The following assumptions were made in preparing the water resource projections: 
 
A non-revenue factor of 8 percent has been added to the projected customer water demand to 
obtain the projected water production. The 8 percent value is based on 2021 billing cycle 
non-revenue water calculation and was provided by the City. 
 
Water demands are based on the unit demands in Table 2.2. 
 
Adjustments have not been made for future water conservation for the initial flow projections. The 
City is assumed to already have water conservation measures in place. 
 
However, if the City chooses to significantly restrict outdoor water use, additional water reductions in 
water use could be obtained. An additional flow projections table has been provided where the 
residential water unit demands for future planning years are assumed to be reduced by one-third. 
2.6.2 
Water Demands 
Table 2.7 (mgd) and Table 2.8 acre-feet per year (AFY) present the projected water demands by land use 
category for the areas that have a water resource to develop in the next 15 years. Table 2.9 (mgd) and 
Table 2.10 (AFY) present the projected water demand categorized by WPA. Table 2.11 (mgd) and 
Table 2.12 (AFY) present the projected water demand with water conservation. To estimate the demand 
projections with conservation, a reduction factor of one-third is applied to residential areas where 
outdoor water use is assumed to be curtailed. 
The 2017 IWMP water demand projection in 2042 for WPAs 3, 4A, and 4B is 32.5 mgd and in this IWMP, 
the 2040 water demand projection for WPAs 3, 4A, and 4B is 19.3 mgd. The 2017 IWMP planning area was 
Central Buckeye, whereas this report uses WPAs as the planning area. 
Table 2.7 
Water Demand Projections for Future CAWS and Commercial/Industrial Areas by Land Use Category (mgd) 
Land Use Category 2023 Water 
Demand (mgd) 
2025 Water 
Demand (mgd) 
2030 Water 
Demand (mgd) 
2035 Water 
Demand (mgd) 
2040 Water 
Demand (mgd) 
Buildout Water 
Demand (mgd) 
Low Density 
Residential 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
2.8 
Medium Density 
Residential 
8.0 
10.7 
14.2 
16.4 
18.5 
142.3 
High Density 
Residential 
0.0 
0.1 
0.1 
0.2 
0.2 
0.8 
Commercial 
1.6 
1.7 
3.4 
3.8 
4.1 
18.8 
Industrial(1) 
0.5 
0.5 
1.9 
2.5 
3.8 
10.4 
School 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.2 
Turf 
0.0 
0.0 
0.1 
0.1 
0.1 
0.2 
Total 
10.1 
13.0 
19.7 
23.0 
26.7 
175.5 
Notes: 
(1) Industrial demand assumes the general industrial land use as provided in the City's 2025 Engineering Design Standards. Future 
projections can be updated when the industrial areas have been designated as warehouses, general industrial, or data centers.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-20 
Table 2.8 
Water Demand Projections for Future CAWS and Commercial/Industrial Areas by Land Use Category (AFY) 
Land Use 
Category 
2023 Water 
Demand (mgd) 
2025 Water 
Demand (mgd) 
2030 Water 
Demand (mgd) 
2035 Water 
Demand (AFY) 
2040 Water 
Demand (AFY) 
Buildout Water 
Demand (AFY) 
Low Density 
Residential 
40 
40 
40 
40 
40 
3,180 
Medium Density 
Residential 
9,000 
12,000 
15,900 
18,400 
20,800 
159,400 
High Density 
Residential 
0 
110 
160 
180 
190 
840 
Commercial 
1,800 
2,000 
3,800 
4,300 
4,500 
21,040 
Industrial 
600 
600 
2,100 
2,800 
4,300 
11,630 
School 
30 
30 
30 
30 
30 
280 
Turf 
0 
0 
60 
70 
80 
230 
Total 
11,470 
14,780 
22,090 
25,820 
29,940 
196,600 
Table 2.9 
Water Demand Projections by WPA (mgd) 
WPA 
2023 Water 
Demand 
(mgd) 
2025  
Water Demand 
(mgd)(1) 
2030  
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
2035  
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
2040  
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
Buildout  
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
1 
1.6 
1.7 
3.2 
3.6 
4.2 
76.2 
2 
1.3 
1.4 
1.7 
2.2 
2.7 
38.7 
3 
4.5 
5.8 
9.2 
10.4 
11.4 
24.4 
4A 
2.1 
3.3 
4.5 
5.6 
6.4 
20.6 
4B 
0.8 
0.9 
1.0 
1.3 
2.0 
15.6 
5 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
Total 
10.3 
13.1 
19.6 
23.1 
26.7 
175.5 
Table 2.10 
Water Demand Projections by WPA (AFY) 
WPA 
2023 Water 
Demand 
(AFY) 
2025 
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
2030  
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
2035  
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
2040  
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
Buildout  
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
1 
1,800 
1,900 
3,600 
4,000 
4,700 
85,400 
2 
1,400 
1,600 
1,900 
2,500 
3,000 
43,400 
3 
5,000 
6,500 
10,300 
11,600 
12,800 
27,300 
4A 
2,300 
3,700 
5,100 
6,200 
7,200 
23,100 
4B 
900 
1,000 
1,200 
1,400 
2,300 
17,500 
5 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Total 
11,400 
14,700 
22,100 
25,700 
30,000 
196,700

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-21 
Table 2.11 
Water Demand Projections with Water Conservation by WPA (mgd) 
WPA 
2023 
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
2025 
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
2030  
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
2035  
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
2040  
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
Buildout  
Water Demand 
(mgd) 
1 
1.6 
1.6 
2.1 
2.4 
2.8 
51.1 
2 
1.3 
1.3 
1.2 
1.5 
1.8 
25.9 
3 
4.5 
4.5 
6.2 
7.0 
7.6 
16.3 
4A 
2.1 
2.1 
3.0 
3.7 
4.3 
13.8 
4B 
0.8 
0.8 
0.7 
0.8 
1.4 
10.5 
5 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
Total 
10.3 
10.3 
13.2 
15.4 
17.9 
117.6 
Table 2.12 
Water Demand Projections with Water Conservation by WPA (AFY) 
WPA 
2023 
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
2025 
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
2030  
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
2035  
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
2040  
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
Buildout  
Water Demand 
(AFY) 
1 
1,800 
1,800 
2,410 
2,680 
3,150 
57,200 
2 
1,400 
1,400 
1,270 
1,680 
2,010 
29,060 
3 
5,000 
5,000 
6,900 
7,770 
8,580 
18,290 
4A 
2,300 
2,300 
3,420 
4,150 
4,820 
15,460 
4B 
900 
900 
800 
940 
1,540 
11,720 
5 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Total 
11,400 
11,400 
14,800 
17,220 
20,100 
131,730 
2.7 
Wastewater Flow Projections 
2.7.1 
Wastewater Flow Factors 
Wastewater flows are estimated by taking the ratio of the wastewater flow in a service area divided by the 
water demand in an area. The City's wastewater flows in Central Buckeye were divided by the water 
production to obtain the wastewater to water factor of 0.56. Relative to other communities, the 
wastewater-to-water factor is high and is in the direction that Arizona communities should move with 
limited water resources. 
2.7.2 
Wastewater Flows 
Table 2.13 and Table 2.14 present the wastewater flow projections categorized by WPA.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-22 
Table 2.13 
Wastewater Flow Projections by WPA (mgd) 
WPA 
2023 Wastewater 
Flow  
(mgd) 
2025 Wastewater 
Flow  
(mgd) 
2030 Wastewater 
Flow  
(mgd) 
2035 Wastewater 
Flow  
(mgd) 
2040 Wastewater 
Flow  
(mgd) 
Buildout 
Wastewater Flow  
(mgd) 
1 
0.8 
0.9 
1.7 
1.9 
2.2 
39.6 
2 
0.7 
0.7 
0.9 
1.2 
1.4 
20.1 
3 
2.3 
3.0 
4.7 
5.3 
5.8 
12.6 
4A 
1.1 
1.7 
2.3 
2.9 
3.3 
10.7 
4B 
0.4 
0.5 
0.5 
0.7 
1.1 
8.1 
5 
0 
0.3 
0.4 
0.4 
0.4 
0.6 
Total 
5.3 
7.1 
10.5 
12.4 
14.2 
91.7 
Table 2.14 
Wastewater Flow Projections by WPA (AFY) 
WPA 
2023 Wastewater 
Flow  
(AFY) 
2025 Wastewater 
Flow  
(AFY) 
2030 Wastewater 
Flow  
(AFY) 
2035 Wastewater 
Flow  
(AFY) 
2040 Wastewater 
Flow  
(AFY) 
Buildout 
Wastewater Flow  
(AFY) 
1 
900 
1,000 
1,900 
2,100 
2,400 
44,300 
2 
700 
800 
1,000 
1,300 
1,600 
22,500 
3 
2,500 
3,300 
5,300 
6,000 
6,500 
14,100 
4A 
1,200 
1,900 
2,600 
3,200 
3,700 
12,000 
4B 
500 
500 
600 
700 
1,200 
9,100 
5 
0 
300 
400 
500 
500 
700 
Total 
5,800 
7,800 
11,800 
13,800 
15,900 
102,700 
2.8 
Reclaimed Water Flow Projections 
2.8.1 
Reclaimed Water Flow Projection Assumptions 
Reclaimed water projections are estimated based on the following assumptions: 
 
The reclaimed water flow is calculated based on the wastewater flow multiplied by the 
wastewater-to-reclaimed water ratio to account for water losses in the wastewater treatment 
process. 
 
The wastewater flow to reclaimed water flow ratio is 0.92. 
2.8.2 
Reclaimed Water Flows 
Table 2.15 and Table 2.16 present the projected reclaimed water flow by WPA.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-23 
Table 2.15 
Reclaimed Water Flow Projections by WPA (mgd) 
WPA 
2023 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(mgd) 
2025 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(mgd) 
2030 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(mgd) 
2035 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(mgd) 
2040 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(mgd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed Water 
Flow (mgd) 
1 
0.7 
0.8 
1.5 
1.7 
2.0 
36.4 
2 
0.6 
0.7 
0.8 
1.1 
1.3 
18.5 
3 
2.1 
2.7 
4.3 
4.9 
5.4 
11.6 
4A 
1 
1.5 
2.1 
2.6 
3 
9.8 
4B 
0.4 
0.4 
0.5 
0.6 
1 
7.5 
5 
0 
0.2 
0.4 
0.4 
0.4 
0.6 
Total 
4.8 
6.3 
9.6 
11.3 
13.1 
84.4 
Table 2.16 
Reclaimed Water Flow Projections by WPA (AFY) 
WPA 
2023 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(AFY) 
2025 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(AFY) 
2030 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(AFY) 
2035 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(AFY) 
2040 Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(AFY) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed Water 
Flow (AFY) 
1 
800 
900 
1,700 
1,900 
2,200 
40,800 
2 
700 
700 
900 
1,200 
1,500 
20,700 
3 
2,300 
3,100 
4,800 
5,500 
6,000 
13,000 
4A 
1,100 
1,700 
2,400 
3,000 
3,400 
11,000 
4B 
400 
500 
600 
700 
1,100 
8,400 
5 
0 
300 
400 
400 
400 
600 
Total 
5,300 
7,200 
10,800 
12,700 
14,600 
94,500 
2.9 
Flow Projections Summary 
Water demands, wastewater flows, and reclaimed water flows by development for Master Planned 
communities and for individual defined developments in the City are presented in Appendix 2A for 
infrastructure planning. 
Water production requirements that include non-revenue water, wastewater, and reclaimed water flow 
projections by WPAs are presented in Table 2.17 (mgd) and Table 2.18 (AFY) to show the water resources 
needed to serve the City's WPAs. Water production requirements that include non-revenue water, 
wastewater, and reclaimed water flow projections by water resource category are presented in Table 2.19 
(mgd) and Table 2.20 (AFY).

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-24 
Table 2.17 
Buildout Water Flows by WPAs (mgd) 
WPA 
Buildout Water Production  
(mgd)(1) 
Buildout Wastewater Flow 
(mgd) 
Buildout Reclaimed Water Flow 
(mgd) 
1 
76.2 
39.6 
36.4 
2 
38.7 
20.1 
18.5 
3 
24.4 
12.6 
11.6 
4A 
20.6 
10.7 
9.8 
4B 
15.6 
8.1 
7.5 
5 
0.0 
0.6 
0.6 
Total 
175.5 
91.7 
84.4 
Notes: 
(1) Buildout water production is the buildout water demand plus 8% non-revenue water, which is greater than the Table 2.7 and Table 2.8 
projected buildout water demand. 
Table 2.18 
Buildout Water Flows by WPAs (AFY) 
WPA 
Buildout Water Production  
(AFY) 
Buildout Wastewater Flow  
(AFY) 
Buildout Reclaimed Water Flow 
(AFY) 
1 
85,380 
44,300 
40,800 
2 
43,370 
22,500 
20,700 
3 
27,300 
14,100 
13,000 
4A 
23,080 
12,000 
11,000 
4B 
17,490 
9,100 
8,400 
5 
0 
700 
600 
Total 
196,620 
102,700 
94,500 
Notes: 
(1) Buildout water production is the buildout water demand plus 8 percent non-revenue water, which is greater than the Table 2.7 and 
Table 2.8 projected buildout water demand. 
Table 2.19 
Buildout Water Demand by Water Resource Category for WPAs 
WPA 
Buildout Water Production  
(mgd) 
Buildout Wastewater Flow 
(mgd) 
Buildout Reclaimed Water 
Flow (mgd) 
Developed 
10.7 
5.6 
5.1 
Developing 
3.8 
2.1 
2 
Grandfathered 
2 
1 
1 
CAWS but not Developed 
15.9 
8.3 
7.6 
Water Resource Undefined 
128.9 
67.2 
61.8 
CAWS not Required 
14.1 
7.5 
6.9 
Total 
175.4 
91.7 
84.4

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2-25 
Table 2.20 
Buildout Water Demand by Water Resource Category for WPAs (AFY) 
WPA 
Buildout Water Production  
(AFY) 
Buildout Wastewater Flow  
(AFY) 
Buildout Reclaimed Water 
Flow (AFY) 
Developed 
12,000 
6,200 
5,700 
Developing 
4,200 
2,400 
2,200 
Grandfathered 
2,200 
1,200 
1,100 
CAWS but not Developed 
17,900 
9,300 
8,500 
Water Resource Undefined 
144,400 
75,200 
69,200 
CAWS not Required 
15,800 
8,400 
7,800 
Total 
196,500 
102,700 
94,500

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-1 
CHAPTER 3 WATER RESOURCES 
3.1 
Introduction 
The City's Water Resources Department manages the City's drinking water, wastewater, and reclaimed 
water systems. The City's water portfolio consists of surface water from the Colorado River, groundwater, 
reclaimed water, and stored water credits. 
The City completed its first IWMP in 2017, which identified options for acquiring additional water 
resources to promote long-term sustainability and planned growth. One of the key recommendations 
from the 2017 IWMP was for the City to take steps to acquire a DAWS, which would allow the City more 
control in managing growth and deployment of water resources. 
In 2020, the City engaged in a WRMP that was focused on identifying potential supply options and the 
associated acquisition costs for new sources of supply, including the infrastructure required to deliver the 
water to customers. The 2025 IWMP builds on the work of these recent water resources planning 
documents and identifies a phased approach for the City to obtain a DAWS. 
The water resources chapter presented here identifies: 
 The regulatory guidelines the City must work within to obtain, manage, and deploy water resources. 
 The water resources currently available to the City as well as additional supplies that could potentially 
be acquired. 
 Actions that the City can take to obtain a DAWS through a phased approach. 
 Additional recommendations for the City to consider over the next 5 to 10 years that will support the 
City's ability to maintain a DAWS and expand their DAWS service area. 
As the City looks to the future, obtaining a DAWS and practicing sound water resources management 
practices, policies, and actions will be vital to the City's ability to continue to grow and attract economic 
development opportunities. It will also provide a mechanism for the City to continue to provide safe, 
reliable long-term water supplies to its citizens. 
3.2 
Regulatory Framework 
Arizona water law separately governs the use of surface water, CAP water, groundwater, and reclaimed 
water. The State of Arizona regulates surface water with the Public Water Code established in 1919. The 
Arizona GMA of 1980 regulates groundwater in Arizona. 
Generally, Arizona's water laws are intended to provide for and promote orderly use of the State's 
available water resources. Additional statutes also impact the acquisition and use of Colorado River water, 
including the CAP, and to a minimal extent, reclaimed wastewater (referred to as effluent in the statutes).

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-2 
Arizona's water statutes are complex, but necessary to help protect and efficiently use this valuable 
resource. The combination of statutes, administrative rules, court decisions, and other legal agreements 
collectively govern the amount of water available, how it can be conveyed, and how and where it can be 
used by the City. Understanding how these legal and institutional issues impact the use of the City's water 
supplies is key to effectively maintaining and managing a robust water resources portfolio while planning 
for the acquisition of future water supplies needed to serve growth. 
The following sections highlight and summarize some of the key components of the many regulations 
and institutional constraints influencing water resources planning for the City. 
3.2.1 
Groundwater Code: 1980 Groundwater Management Act 
Prior to 1980, specific areas of Arizona experienced groundwater levels declining at rapid rates. Local, 
state, and federal interests recognized the threats this posed to the economy and welfare of the State. The 
Arizona State Legislature enacted the GMA regulating the use of groundwater. 
The GMA created four initial AMAs where the most severe groundwater overdraft was occurring. These 
initial AMAs include the Phoenix AMA, Prescott AMA, Pinal AMA, and the Tucson AMA (now divided into 
the Tucson and Santa Cruz AMAs). Each AMA has an established statutory groundwater management 
goal. 
The City is located within the Phoenix AMA. The statutory water management goal for the Phoenix AMA is 
to achieve safe yield by the year 2025. 
There are five primary provisions that apply to the Phoenix AMA: 
 Establishment of a program of groundwater rights and permits. 
 Preparation of 5 water management plans (for 4, 10-year management periods beginning in 1980, and 
a final 5-year management plan for years 2020 through 2025) which include mandatory conservation 
requirements. 
 Development of an assured water supply program. 
 Metering and measuring water pumped from wells (with some exceptions for wells pumping less than 
35 gallons per minute [gpm]). 
 Reporting annual water withdrawal and use. 
3.2.1.1 
Assured Water Supply 
The Assured Water Supply (AWS) program included in the 1980 GMA has been strengthened with the 
adoption of the AWS administrative rules in 1995. Entities wishing to develop and sell subdivided lands 
within an AMA (defined as six or more subdivided lots) must demonstrate sufficient renewable water 
supplies are available to meet the proposed new development's demands for 100 years. One way to 
achieve this is for a water provider to establish and maintain a DAWS. Then, new subdivisions can be 
approved for development within the water provider's service area. Another way to achieve this is by 
individual developers obtaining a CAWS for each lot.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-3 
There are five requirements for demonstrating an AWS: 
 Sufficient water supplies must be physically, legally, and continuously available for a 100-year period. 
 The water provider must have the financial capability to install the required facilities to treat and 
deliver water. 
 The quality of the water sources must meet Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) 
requirements. 
 Uses of the water must be consistent with the Management Goal of the AMA. 
 Uses of the water must be consistent with the conservation requirements of the AMA Management 
Plan. 
The AWS Rules limit the amount of groundwater a City with a Designation (designated municipal 
provider) may withdraw to be "consistent with the management goal" of the AMA. Understanding this 
provision is complicated and based upon several legal distinctions, but critical to determining how water 
supplies must be managed for the City, which seeks to become a designated municipal provider. 
The differences between "paper water accounting" and physical water management are important. For 
example, all water physically located underground for the purpose of determining the amount of water 
that is "physically available", is considered groundwater. In other words, this "underground water" may 
have several legal titles such as long-term storage credits, incidental recharge credits, etc. However, 
because of the physical availability component of the AWS designation criteria, the amount of "credits" 
held by the water provider are meaningless if there is insufficient water physically present in the aquifer 
for the City to pump and use. Once physical availability is achieved and maintained, then the "paper water 
accounting" process can be applied. 
There is also a component of legally defined groundwater a designated municipal provider can use 
without incurring a replenishment obligation. This groundwater is maintained in the provider's 
"Groundwater Allowance Account." This account is comprised of several legal "subclasses." While this can 
be a complex mix of supplies, it generally includes: 
1. The initial, or "Phase-In," groundwater allowance is computed as a percentage of the provider's 
historical water use. 
2. The groundwater allowance may be increased by extinguishment credits obtained through the 
extinguishment of Grandfathered Groundwater Rights. 
3. The groundwater allowance account is increased annually by an "incidental recharge factor" 
calculated as a percentage of water use (this mathematically increases in volume as water use 
increases). This subclass of allowable groundwater should be considered water that has returned to 
the aquifer from system leaks, excess water applied to landscapes, and stormwater flows. While 
included in the groundwater allowance account, this water can be considered a physical supply of 
groundwater as opposed to water from the Phase-In Allowance and extinguishment credits.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-4 
3.2.1.2 
Groundwater Rights 
The GMA established several classes of groundwater rights required for most groundwater pumping 
within an AMA. These rights include: 
 Service Area Rights: This is the classification of the groundwater right held by the City. These may 
also be issued to irrigation districts for the delivery of groundwater to their member lands. 
 Irrigation Grandfathered Rights (IGFR): These rights are, in general terms, held by commercial 
agricultural landowners. 
 Type 1 Non-Irrigation Grandfathered Rights (Type 1 Rights): These rights are derived from lands 
that were originally relying on IGFRs, but for specific reasons retired the land from agriculture and 
needed a legal right for the landowner to continue using groundwater for non-agricultural purposes. 
 Type 2 Non-Irrigation Grandfathered Rights (Type 2 Rights): These rights are held by 
non-agricultural groundwater users and were issued after passage of the GMA. These rights can be 
leased, all or in part, or sold in their entirety, for use anywhere within the AMA. 
The number of IGFRs and Type 2 Rights can only be reduced over time; no new IGFRs or Type 2 Rights 
can be created in the AMA. Type 1 Rights could theoretically increase in number but only through the 
retirement of IGFRs, which typically are awarded a reduced groundwater entitlement for non-agricultural 
water uses. 
The term "Grandfathered Rights" is derived from the fact that water uses in existence for the 5 years prior 
to enactment of the GMA (1975 – 1980) were "grandfathered in" and awarded the right to continue 
pumping and using groundwater. This includes irrigated lands that converted to a non-irrigation use 
during a specific qualifying period prior to 1980; these lands were issued Type 1 Rights. Type 1 Rights 
created after the GMA by retiring IGFRs are still considered grandfathered rights since their origin is from 
irrigation grandfathered rights. 
Service Area Rights 
For municipal water providers such as the City, service area rights allow for the withdrawal and 
transportation of as much groundwater as required within the water provider's service area boundaries to 
serve the needs of their customers. Service area rights are the only right that can be increased in volume 
and delivery area, and they are the only groundwater right that can be newly established within an AMA. 
There are specific procedures for expanding/extending existing service area rights, and for establishing 
new and/ or "satellite" service areas. However, to be consistent with the goal of the Phoenix AMA, 
groundwater use must now be derived from the recovery of water stored underground through 
underground storage facilities (USFs) and groundwater savings facilities (GSF) or replaced (replenished) 
immediately by the designated municipal provider with a renewable water source. Alternatively, the 
designated municipal provider can rely upon the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment 
District (CAGRD) to provide this service and pay a replenishment tax to the district.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-5 
Irrigation Grandfathered Rights and Extinguishment Credits 
These rights allow the use of groundwater to irrigate only the exact land where the initial right was 
established (with rare exceptions). If the land develops for a non-agricultural use and receives water 
pursuant to the City's service area right, the IGFR can be extinguished, and credits are created that can be 
conveyed to the City (or sold to others). The number of extinguishment credits (ECs) that can be 
generated is gradually reduced by a formula in the ADWR administrative rules until the year 2025 when 
the ability to create these credits in the Phoenix AMA ceases. If these rights are not extinguished upon 
development, they are classified as inactive/developed by the ADWR and the rights are not typically 
re-activated for commercial agricultural use. 
Type 1 Non-Irrigation Grandfathered Right 
These rights provide for the use of groundwater on lands that are permanently retired from commercial 
agriculture and were converted to a non-irrigation use after January 1, 1965. Under specific restrictions, 
Type 1 rights can still be created from IGFRs. One of these conditions is that the land cannot reasonably 
receive water from a potable water provider (e.g., not completely surrounded by a potable water 
provider). A Type 1 Right allows withdrawal of up to 3 acre-feet (AF) of groundwater per acre per year. 
Type 1 Rights cannot be transferred to other lands. If the land is eventually served by a potable water 
provider, the right can be extinguished up until the year 2025 pursuant to a specific formula contained in 
the ADWR Administrative rules. 
Type 2 Non-Irrigation Grandfathered Right 
These rights are based on the maximum historical pumping of groundwater for a non-irrigation use in any 
one year between 1975 and 1980. A Type 2 Right can be leased in whole or in part, or sold only in its 
entirety, and used anywhere within the Phoenix AMA. It can also be extinguished pursuant to the ADWR's 
administrative rules until the year 2025, however, the flexibility and ability to market these rights make the 
extinguishment of these rights extremely rare. There is also a subclass of these rights restricted to specific 
uses such as power generation and sand and gravel operations. 
3.2.2 
Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District 
In 1990, the State Legislature authorized the establishment of Groundwater Replenishment Districts. 
CAGRD, which is a division of the Central Arizona Water Conservation District (CAWCD), was established 
in 1993 with voluntary membership. The purpose of the CAGRD is to provide a mechanism for landowners 
and water providers to demonstrate an AWS under the AWS rules. 
The CAGRD recharges unused CAP water, or other renewable water supplies, to offset groundwater 
pumping by its members. CAWCD owns and operates several USFs including the Agua Fria, Hieroglyphic 
Mountains, Tonopah Desert, and Superstition Mountains projects where the CAGRD can store water. The 
CAGRD can also store water in GSFs. The CAGRD is not currently required, however, to replace groundwater 
in the same location where it was extracted. It can replace groundwater pumping anywhere within the AMA. 
Because the City's primary water supplies are groundwater, to obtain a DAWS, the City will need to 
establish a CAGRD membership and become a member service area to demonstrate consistency with the 
management goal of the Phoenix AMA. This will provide a means to offset the City's groundwater 
pumping but does not provide the City with a physical water supply.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-6 
3.2.3 
Recharge, Underground Storage and Recovery, and Replenishment 
In 1986, the State enacted the Underground Water Storage and Recovery (UWSR) and Underground 
Water Storage and Replenishment Act (UWSRA) to allow groundwater recharge, create a long-term 
storage credit tracking system, and regulate recharge, storage, and recovery of all classes of water. These 
Acts allow renewable supplies to be recharged and stored underground to meet future demands, and 
encourage the use of excess renewable supplies, such as CAP water and reclaimed water, that would 
otherwise remain unused. 
The distinction between "recharge" and "underground storage and recovery" is simple. Water can be 
recharged by any party without the intent to later recover the recharged water for its use. In a case like 
this, the water recharged would be considered a "donation to the AMA". "Underground Storage and 
Recovery" is the practice of storing water underground for recovery and use later. Finally, the statutes 
refer to replenishment; this is the practice of replacing groundwater previously pumped from the aquifer 
by a specific party. 
Underground storage projects involve two types of permits, namely the USF Permit and the Water 
Storage (WS) Permit. The USF permit regulates the "how" of underground storage, and the WS permit is 
issued for the purposes of accruing and accounting for credits. The USF has two types of physical facilities, 
namely constructed and managed. Constructed facilities include facilities specifically built for facilitating 
storage such as spreading basins, injection wells, and vadose zone wells. The managed facility permit 
applies when water is discharged to a natural stream and water is allowed to infiltrate through natural 
processes. 
The UWSRA was amended in 1990 to include provisions for a third type of recharge identified as "indirect" 
or "in lieu" through a GSF. Originally, this technique was called indirect recharge because it is an "indirect" 
method where reclaimed water or CAP water is delivered by a water provider, to a groundwater user, such as 
an agricultural irrigation district. The recipient then agrees to reduce groundwater pumping by a like 
amount. The water provider gains storage credits for water delivered, with the same legal identity (CAP 
water, reclaimed water, etc.) equal to the amount not pumped by the irrigation district minus a 5 percent cut 
for the aquifer (reclaimed water is exempt from this cut). At present, only water used by agricultural irrigators 
in excess of their own CAP allocation can be counted as credits. It is possible under the statutes that water 
could be delivered to a groundwater using, non-agricultural water user, such as a golf course, to accomplish 
the same thing. 
An amendment to the UWSRA was added which established "annual storage and recovery" (AS&R) 
accounts. This addition to the UWSRA allows for the use of underground storage facilities and wells to 
store and recover water on an annual basis without having to construct costly treatment and conveyance 
facilities. Water stored under an AS&R permit must be recovered in the same calendar year as it was 
stored. Currently, along with long term storage and recovery, this is one approach to converting reclaimed 
water to drinking water without the expense of direct potable reuse (DPR). 
To recover the stored water credits, a recovery well permit is required. An existing well may be permitted 
as a recovery well provided that it is demonstrated that other wells in the vicinity will not be harmed by 
the recovery of the stored water. Water recovered from a recovery well retains the legal identity of the 
water when it was stored.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-7 
3.2.4 
Central Arizona Project Subcontract 
The CAWCD administers and manages the CAP under its contract with the United Stated Bureau of 
Reclamation (USBR) for the State of Arizona. The City has a subcontract with CAWCD to obtain and use 
CAP water. 
3.2.5 
Arizona Well Spacing and Well Impact Rules 
Well spacing and impact rules for non-exempt wells in the AMAs are established by the ADWR. The 
purpose of these rules is to prevent unreasonable harm to surrounding land or other water users that may 
result from geographic concentrations of wells. These rules address three areas where unreasonable harm 
may occur: 
1. Drawdown of water levels at neighboring wells of record. 
2. Regional land subsidence. 
3. Migration of contaminated groundwater to a well of record. 
Hydrogeologic studies must determine if a new production and/or recovery well will cause unreasonable 
harm. If an adverse impact is projected, options to mitigate the issue may include obtaining written 
consent from owners of impacted wells, reducing the planned pumping rate of the proposed well, or 
moving the proposed well to a new location. 
3.2.6 
Water Reuse Regulations 
Reclaimed (recycled) water in the State of Arizona must meet water quality standards outlined in state 
statutes. Additionally, water released to surface watercourses or groundwater recharge facilities must have 
the appropriate discharge permits. 
3.2.6.1 
Aquifer Protection Permit 
Discharges to aquifers are protected under two main articles of the Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.). 
Article 4 of Chapter 11 (A.A.C. R18-11-400) defines numeric water quality standards for discharges to 
aquifers that are designated for drinking water protected uses. This article establishes water quality 
standards for inorganics, metals, organics, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, and radionuclides. 
Article 2 of Chapter 9 (A.A.C. R18-9-200) defines the requirements of a sewage treatment facility with 
regards to permitting, compliance, discharge characterization, reporting, and hydrogeologic studies to 
determine the impact to an aquifer, if any. This regulation also requires new or expanded facilities to meet 
Best Available Demonstrated Control Technology (BADCT) requirements to achieve the greatest degree of 
discharge reduction. BADCT requires property setback limits for noise and odor control, provisions for a 
standby power source, and protection against floods. Treatment performance requirements are 
established and presented in Table 3.1. In addition, a facility must minimize trihalomethane compounds 
generated as disinfection byproducts using chlorination – de-chlorination, ultraviolet, or ozone 
disinfection systems.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-8 
Table 3.1 
Arizona Regulated Wastewater Treatment Requirements for BADCT 
Regulated Parameter 
Limit (mg/L) 
BOD₅ 
30 mg/L (30-day average) 
45 mg/L (7-day average) 
TSS 
30 mg/L (30-day average) 
45 mg/L (7-day average) 
pH 
6.0 - 9.0 
Removal Efficiency for BOD5, CBOD5 and TSS 
85% 
Total Nitrogen 
10 mg/L (5-month geometric mean) 
Fecal Coliform or E. coli Bacteria 
Non-detectable (4 of 7 daily samples) 
Fecal Coliform 
23 CFU/100 mL (single sample max) 
E. Coli Bacteria  
15 CFU/100 mL (single sample max) 
Source: A.A.C. R18-9-B204, September 30, 2019 
mg/L - milligrams per liter; CFU - colony forming units; mL - milliliter(s); BOD₅ - 5-day biochemical oxygen demand; 
TSS - total suspended solids; pH - potential of hydrogen; CBOD5 - 5-day carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand; E. coli - Escherichia coli 
3.2.6.2 
Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 
Under the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) Permit Program, all facilities that 
discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United States (navigable waters) are 
required to get an AZPDES permit. Pollutants can enter waters of the United States from a variety of 
pathways, including agricultural, domestic, and industrial sources. For regulatory purposes, these sources 
are generally categorized as either point source or non-point sources. 
These requirements are defined in the A.A.C. (A.A.C. R18-11-109) and summarized in Table 3.2. 
Table 3.2 
Arizona Regulated Surface Water Quality Parameters by Water Designation 
Regulated Parameter 
FBC 
A&Ww 
AgI 
AgL 
E. coli  
(CFU/100 mL) 
126 mean 
235 max 
-- 
-- 
-- 
pH 
9.0 max 
6.5 min 
0.5 max change due to 
discharge 
9.0 max 
6.5 min 
0.5 max change due to 
discharge 
9.0 max 
4.5 min 
9.0 max 
6.5 min 
Temperature 
-- 
3.0º C max increase 
-- 
-- 
Suspended Solids 
-- 
80 mg/L max 
-- 
-- 
Dissolved Oxygen 
-- 
6.0 mg/L min 
-- 
-- 
Source: A.A.C. R18-11-109, September 30, 2019 
FBC - full-body contact; A&Ww - aquatic and wildlife, warm water; AgI - agricultural irrigation; AgL - agricultural livestock watering

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-9 
3.2.6.3 
Reclaimed Water Quality Standards 
The City produces Class A+ reclaimed (recycled) water, as defined by the A.A.C., Section R18-11-303. Key 
treatment processes required for the A+ designation are secondary treatment, filtration, nitrogen removal, 
and disinfection. Additionally, the state requires that the water meet the standards shown in Table 3.3. 
Table 3.3 
ADEQ Class A+ Reclaimed Water Quality Requirements 
Parameter 
Units 
Value 
24-hour Average Turbidity Prior to Disinfection 
NTU 
≤2 
Turbidity of Treated Water (single sample maximum) 
NTU 
≤5 
Fecal Coliform 
- 
No fecal coliforms in the last 4 of 7 days 
Maximum single sample 23/100 mL 
Total Nitrogen 
ppm 
<10 
(5-sample geometric mean) 
Source: A.A.C. R18-11-303, September 30, 2019 
NTU - nephelometric turbidity unit; ppm - parts per million 
As the highest class of reclaimed water, Class A+ water can be used for any approved type of direct reuse 
listed in Table A of A.A.C. Section R18-11-303. 
3.2.6.4 
Advanced Water Purification 
ADEQ has recently revised the A.A.C to allow for the expansion of advanced water purification (AWP) 
(previously referred to as DPR) facilities for potable reuse subject to the Safe Drinking Water Act. While 
both direct and indirect potable reuse (IPR) is currently allowed under ADEQ's rules (A.A.C. R18-09-007), 
specific regulatory guidance is needed to facilitate water providers' ability to engage in potable reuse. 
In Arizona House Bill 2861, the legislature mandated that ADEQ must establish all rules needed 
to establish and implement a successful AWP program on or before December 31, 2024. This will include 
comprehensive regulatory standards and a permitting process. In 2022, ADEQ established a Technical 
Advisory Group (TAG) made up of regulators, municipalities, consultants, and other experts to prepare 
recommendations for Arizona's AWP program. 
On March 4, 2025, the ADEQ AWP final rules took effect. These rules outline requirements for AWP 
implementation and permitting, advanced water treatment, pathogen and chemical and removal 
standards, initial source water characterization, enhanced source control, operational requirements, 
operator certification, monitoring and reporting, and public communication.  
3.2.7 
Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District 
The BWCDD was established in1922 by farmers in the Buckeye Valley and Buckeye Irrigation Company to 
maintain the Buckeye Canal and to manage delivery of nearly 130,000 AFY of water for agricultural 
purposes. The City has agreements with BWCDD to lease several of their wells that can be used pursuant 
to the City's service area right for delivery of water for potable uses. The water quality of this source of 
supply would require treatment prior to delivery to customers.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-10 
3.2.8 
Roosevelt Irrigation District 
The RID was formed in 1923 and owns and operates the RID Main Canal, which delivers irrigation water to 
west valley cities, including the City. The City has an agreement with RID to discharge reclaimed water 
(referred to as effluent, per the agreement) produced at the Sundance WRF and Central Buckeye WWTP to 
the RID GSF. The agreement allows a maximum discharge of 3,000 gpm (4.3 mgd), (5,000 AFY) with a 
target, constant flow rate of 1,000 gpm (1.4 mgd). The City has the right to recover, sell or transfer any 
credits earned from the City's reclaimed water stored in the RID GSF. The City pays a discharge fee that is 
calculated on a dollar per AF basis as well as a monthly connection fee for discharge of reclaimed water to 
the RID canal. 
3.2.9 
Ag-to-Urban Program  
The passage of SB1611 in June 2025, created the Ag-to-Urban (A2U) program. Under the A2U program, 
eligible IGFR holders within the Phoenix and Pinal AMAs can voluntarily relinquish pumping rights in 
exchange for groundwater savings credits. These credits can be applied towards the physical availability of 
water required under the Assured Water Program and can be pledged for a CAWS or a DAWS This 
program could allow lands located in the City's WPA 4A and 4B planning areas to move forward with 
residential development.  
3.3 
Water Resources Portfolio 
The following water resources are the major components of the City's current water portfolio: 
1. Groundwater. 
2. CAP water. 
3. Reclaimed water. 
4. Long-term storage credits derived from storage/delivery of reclaimed water. 
The yield and delivery capability of each of the City's water resources is impacted to some degree by 
hydrologic/climatologic effects, the location of the service area demand, and the capacity of the water 
transmission and distribution system infrastructure to deliver water to customers. 
The following sections discuss each of the City's water resources from the perspective of resource 
evaluation, drought yield implications, and operational considerations. 
3.3.1 
Groundwater 
All the City's physical water supplies delivered to customers are groundwater legally classified as 
groundwater or water recovered outside the area of hydrologic impact (AOHI). One of the City's water 
management strategies is to increase the amount of storage and recovery within the AOHI, by importing 
a sustainable water source to the AOHI. This provides a direct means to replenish aquifers and potentially 
increase the amount of water that would be included in the City's physical availability determination in 
seeking and maintaining a DAWS.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-11 
3.3.1.1 
Resource Evaluation 
The City's potable water deliveries are physically comprised of groundwater. With respect to a 
Designation, the AWS rules adopted by the ADWR require that for groundwater to be considered 
physically available, pumping must not cause the water table to drop below 1,000 feet below land surface 
over a 100-year period whether the pumping is by the City or other groundwater users. Demonstrating 
groundwater physical availability requires groundwater modeling to acquire a Designation as well as 
updates periodically as part of the Designation modification process. 
Once it is determined that there is adequate groundwater physically available, the legal character of the 
water becomes the focus. As the City seeks to obtain a DAWS, the Department will determine if the City is 
eligible to obtain an initial groundwater allowance. Under the AWS rules, the City would be eligible for an 
incidental recharge allocation of 4 percent of the total annual water demand that is added to its 
Groundwater Allowance Account. The formula is based upon the estimated volume of water recharged to 
the groundwater aquifer resulting from the delivery to end users. Therefore, the volume of incidental 
recharge will increase as water use increases in the future. This water is distinct not only in terms of how it 
is calculated, but in that it is in theory derived from physical water returning to the aquifer. As such, this 
water not only helps the City with respect to the legal identity of the water, it is also a physically available 
supply that, while minimal in comparison to annual pumping, helps to slightly mitigate physical availability 
impacts associated with long-term pumping. 
3.3.1.2 
Drought Yield Implications 
Groundwater pumping is theoretically drought proof and is an excellent physical source during periods of 
reduced surface water supplies. This assumes that there are sufficient production wells to meet maximum 
day demands (MDDs) and that water quality standards can be met. Groundwater pumping is not subject 
to canal delivery limitations, seasonal dry-ups, or drought impacts as surface water supplies are. 
3.3.1.3 
Operational Considerations 
The City operates and maintains existing wells and continues to develop groundwater production wells 
throughout its service area, as needed to meet demands. Excess groundwater pumping must be 
replenished, and individual production wells may be subject to annual withdrawal rates/volume 
limitations. Groundwater quality is also a concern for the City, particularly in southern Buckeye with 
respect to total dissolved solids (TDS). 
3.3.2 
Central Arizona Project 
3.3.2.1 
Resource Evaluation 
The CAP system is designed to deliver 1.415 million AF of Colorado River water annually to central and 
southern Arizona in normal water years. Of this total, 620,678 AFY has been contracted to municipal and 
industrial (M&I) entities, including the City. The remainder includes CAP Indian and other contracted water 
and uncontracted Non-Indian Agriculture (NIA) priority water. 
The City has an M&I allocation with a declining annual balance of 223 AF in the year 2023 and levels off to 
68 AF. The City has agreements with Del Webb Corporation to deliver this water to the Festival Ranch 
Master Planned community for use at the golf course within Festival Ranch. The City also has a CAP NIA 
allocation of 2,786 AFY, which was obtained in September 2021.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-12 
3.3.2.2 
Drought Yield Implications 
The Colorado River is in a nearly 22-year drought. Overallocation of the Colorado River, additional losses 
attributed to phreatophyte plant use, evaporation, and other system losses combine into what is called 
the "structural deficit". The structural deficit and the drought are contributing to declining water levels in 
Lake Mead which affects the amount of deliverable Colorado River water to California, Nevada, Arizona, 
and Mexico. 
In 2007, interim shortage guidelines were established to reduce water deliveries to Arizona, Nevada, and 
Mexico (through Minute 323), once Lake Mead elevations dropped below 1,075 feet. These reduced 
deliveries were agreed upon by the parties to develop an intentionally created surplus to slow and 
hopefully prevent the water level in Lake Mead from dropping below 1,025 feet, which is the lowest 
practical operational level to maintain water deliveries. The 2007 interim guidelines are temporary and 
expire in 2026. 
In 2019, the USBR recognized that additional mitigation of declining levels in Lake Mead was necessary. 
The USBR then facilitated the Drought Contingency Plan (DCP) with separate agreements for the upper 
basin states (Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and New Mexico) and lower basin states (California, Nevada, and 
Arizona). The DCP went into effect on May 20, 2019, and effectively builds on the 2007 interim guidelines 
by establishing additional voluntary reductions for all the lower basin states as well as reduced water 
deliveries to Mexico (via the Binational Water Scarcity Contingency Plan). Additional discussions continue 
in hopes to mitigate the factors contributing to the declining water levels in Lake Mead. 
Under the DCP, Colorado River resources delivered to Arizona could be reduced between 192,000 AF 
(7 percent of total Colorado River Apportionment) and 720,000 AFY (23 percent of total Colorado River 
Apportionment). Cuts to specific sub-contractors will be based on water right priority. Table 3.4 
summarizes the DCP shortage tiers and identifies the potential impacts to the City's CAP allocation. 
Table 3.4 
Central Arizona Project DCP Reductions  
 
Tier 0 
Mead 1090' 
Tier 1 
Mead 1075' 
Tier 2A 
Mead 1050' 
Tier 2B 
Mead 1045' 
Tier 3 
Mead 1025' 
Tier 4 
Mead < 1025' 
Percent Cut to NIA (%) 
0% 
70% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
Percent Cut to M&I (%) 
0% 
0% 
0% 
5% 
15% 
30% 
Most of the City's CAP water is NIA priority and is at the highest risk of being cut with 70 percent 
reduction in a declared Tier 1 shortage. A Tier 2B shortage was declared for 2023, which corresponds to a 
100 percent cut of NIA water. In August 2023, the USBR declared a Tier 1 shortage for 2024 following an 
abnormally wet winter during 2023, where water levels improved throughout the Colorado River basin. 
This reversal from a Tier 2B to Tier 1 shortage may slightly increase availability of NIA water to the City as 
well as other communities in Arizona that rely on NIA water. 
The DCP provides a good planning framework for the IWMP through the year 2026. However, additional 
mitigation actions that may be in place after the 2007 interim guidelines and DCP agreements expire in 
2026 are unknown at this time. Adding to this uncertainty, the Department of the Interior (DOI) may enact 
actions outside these guidelines that it deems necessary to maintain water levels in Lake Mead. An action 
by the DOI outside of these guidelines would be unprecedented and very challenging to plan for.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-13 
3.3.2.3 
Operational Considerations 
CAP water is ordered for a full year each October prior to the year of the actual water delivery. Water 
deliveries are scheduled monthly, and the total annual amount may include all or part of the City's 
available supply based upon its available allocation. Each sub-contract contains a provision limiting a 
subcontractor to a maximum of 11 percent of their total CAP supply delivered per month (this is 
equivalent to a 1.32 peak month to average monthly delivery factor). This peak delivery rate has not been 
strictly enforced. While it is not known if and when the peak limit will be enforced, it is prudent for the 
City to assume that it could be, and to plan its water orders accordingly. Once the City begins operating 
under an AS&R or water treatment plan program, this will become a critical planning element. 
The CAP system is an interruptible supply by virtue of the hydrology of the watershed and the demands of 
the other six basins states and Mexico. Outages are also possible as a result of catastrophic failures of 
pumping equipment, electrical services, or the canal itself. Maintenance of the CAP infrastructure, 
including the canal is completed while the system continues to operate. There are no periodic dry-ups on 
the main CAP canal system. 
The City and EPCOR have executed an agreement for the City to treat and deliver a portion of their CAP 
supply at the EPCOR White Tanks Water Treatment Plant (WTP), which receives CAP water through the 
Beardsley Canal. Construction of the Buckeye-EPCOR interconnect, located along McDowell Road west of 
Verrado Way, is currently underway. This interconnect will be used to convey this treated water to the City. 
The Beardsley Canal is taken out of service for maintenance on an annual basis. This shut-down typically 
occurs between December and February and this dry-up period should be factored into water operations. 
3.3.3 
Reclaimed Water 
3.3.3.1 
Resource Evaluation 
The goal of the City's reclaimed water management program is to beneficially use the reclaimed water 
produced by the City through either underground storage and recovery or reuse. Direct reclaimed water 
use is designated for non-potable water uses such as landscape irrigation and other aesthetic uses. 
Reclaimed water that is not directly used is either recharged by the City at its Tartesso WRF or is delivered 
to the RID GSF to accrue long-term storage credits (LTSC). As of October 2023, the City has accrued 
10,055 AF of LTSCs. 
Groundwater pumping can then be characterized as recovery of reclaimed water to comply with the legal 
requirements and restrictions that impact groundwater use. These credits are valuable and can be sold or 
exchanged for other water supplies. 
3.3.3.2 
Drought Yield Implications 
Like groundwater, reclaimed water is not affected by drought and the supply remains relatively constant. 
When the City enacts its Drought Management Plan to temporarily reduce water use, most of the water 
saved is likely to occur by reductions in outdoor water use, which does not impact reclaimed water 
supplies. However, some reductions in indoor water use may occur that could reduce the reclaimed water 
supply.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-14 
3.3.3.3 
Operational Considerations 
The use of the City's reclaimed water resources is based on current executed agreements between the 
City and end users. These agreements specify a certain reclaimed water delivery amount or committed 
capacity. The infrastructure for delivering the supply includes storage at the WRFs to help balance the 
daily supply and demand. 
Excess reclaimed water is delivered either to the RID GSF for later recovery or to remain in storage as 
banked water as LTSCs or to the BWCDD where no LTSCs are obtained. 
3.3.4 
Water Portfolio Summary 
Table 3.5 summarizes the current total volume of renewable water supplies in the City's Water Portfolio. 
The Town's Service Area right allows groundwater to be pumped to meet demands exceeding 8,324 AFY. 
However, groundwater pumped in excess of the amount of renewable water resources that are recovered 
to offset pumping, must be replenished through the CAGRD. 
Table 3.5 
Buckeye Water Portfolio  
Description 
Normal Year Yield (AFY) 
CAP M&I Entitlement 
68 
CAP NIA Entitlement  
2,786 
Reclaimed Water(1) 
5,470 
Total 
8,324 
Notes: 
(1) Year 2023 reclaimed water production value. 
3.4 
Future Water Supply Opportunities 
3.4.1 
Harquahala Groundwater Basin 
The Harquahala irrigation non-expansion area (INA) is located approximately 35 miles west of Buckeye. 
Under current statutes, groundwater from the Harquahala INA can be imported into the Phoenix AMA, if it 
can be demonstrated that doing so will not cause unreasonable harm to other nearby water users It is 
possible that the CAP canal could be used to wheel the water. However, due to groundwater quality 
concerns with arsenic and nitrates, treatment may be required prior to conveying this water in the CAP 
canal. 
On July 18, 2025, ADWR finalized a Transportation Order that allows groundwater transportation from the 
Harquahala Groundwater Basin to the City's service area. This would allow the City to withdraw up to 
5,926 AFY for up to 110 years with the cumulative volume to not exceed 592,592 AF of groundwater over 
that period.  
Harquahala groundwater can be pledged to a 100-year AWS, but it is not a renewable supply. Rather, it is 
a fixed volume of water that can be deployed, as needed, to meet demands over a period determined by 
the City. While there may be some practical restrictions on delivery requirements, this source does provide 
a mechanism for the City to continue to grow and develop as it seeks additional renewable water 
resources.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-15 
3.4.2 
Reclaimed Water 
Reclaimed water is a critical component of the City's water portfolio. It is the only supply that is certain to 
be maintained, if not increase, as the City continues to grow. It is also a physical supply of "wet" water that 
is reliable even during drought. The City has a lot of flexibility in how reclaimed water can be deployed in 
the future including recharge, non-potable reuse (NPR), IPR, exchanges and DPR. With respect to a DAWS, 
it is critical that the City can demonstrate that the projected volumes of reclaimed water produced can be 
put to beneficial use. If not, ADWR will not count these volumes as renewable supplies in the City's 
portfolio presented in a Designation application. 
3.4.2.1 
Non-Potable Reuse 
NPR includes recycled water that is used for non-drinking purposes such as toilet flushing or landscape 
irrigation. The City generates A+ recycled water at all of its facilities. The water is used to irrigate golf 
courses, turf, and landscape irrigation throughout the City. While NPR can be used to offset potable 
demands, it is important that "new" demand is not created that otherwise would not be if a potable 
source were being used. The reason for this is because recycled water can also be used indirectly or 
directly to meet potable demands, thereby providing more flexibility for the City in managing the total 
water portfolio and having a larger impact on meeting the City's water demands. 
3.4.2.2 
Indirect Potable Reuse 
IPR occurs when an environmental buffer is used to separate recycled wastewater from potable water 
sources. This includes aquifer recharge and recovery and surface water augmentation. Reclaimed water 
from the Tartesso WRF is recharged at the Tartesso USF. Water stored underground by this practice 
accrues as long-term storage credits. The Sundance WRF delivers recycled water to a golf course (NPR) 
but there are times when excess recycled water is produced which is delivered to the RID GSF, which has 
the same effect as recharging to a USF in the City. Recycled water delivered to the RID is used by RID for 
irrigation purposes and the City gets long-term storage credits for the groundwater that would have 
otherwise been pumped by RID to meet those demands (also known as in-lieu recharge). 
IPR is an important water resources strategy because it can increase groundwater physical availability in 
the AOHI, if recharge and recovery are done in the same general area. The "safe harbor" area for 
groundwater recovery is within a 1-mile radius of a USF. As the City plans future water supplies, recycled 
water recharge facilities should be planned at the same time as recovery wells to take advantage of 
recovering within the AOHI (safe harbor) whenever possible. 
3.4.2.3 
Advanced Water Purification 
AWP (previously referred to as DPR), is an emerging strategy that uses treated municipal wastewater to 
augment public water supplies without the use of an environmental buffer. AWP regulations were 
finalized in March 2025. Key treatment requirements of the final rule include pathogen control, chemical 
control, total organic carbon (TOC) removal to 2 mg/L, corrosion control, nitrogen management, failure 
response time, compliance with existing maximum containment levels (MCLs), and cross-connection 
control. While dependent on influent water quality, AWP typically requires the following treatment after 
municipal wastewater treatment: tertiary filtration, advanced oxidation, ultra filtration, reverse osmosis 
(RO), disinfection, softening, and mineral stabilization.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-16 
One benefit of AWP is the ability to deploy recycled water resources immediately for potable use while 
avoiding the additional costs and management required for both recharge facilities (including renewing 
WS and USF permits every 20 years) and recovery wells. While costs for AWP are not insignificant, this 
option is important for the City to consider as an option in a long-term strategy of acquiring additional 
renewable resources, which may include evolving the definition of what the highest and best use of 
recycled water is. 
3.4.3 
Roosevelt Irrigation District 
The RID canal crosses central Buckeye south of the I-10 freeway and is the northern boundary of the 
WPA 4A described in Chapter 2. The RID service area is approximately coincident with WPA 4A. The RID 
canal could be a potential conveyance for a future water supply for the City. RID receives exchanged 
effluent (recycled water) from the City of Phoenix 23rd Avenue WWTP, which is to be used only on RID 
lands. In the future, it is possible that the agreement under which this water is provided could be 
amended to allow the exchanged effluent to be used for M&I purposes. 
3.4.4 
Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District 
The Buckeye Canal crosses central Buckeye south of the RID canal and is the northern boundary of the WPA 4B 
described in Chapter 2. The BWCDD manages the Buckeye Canal and its service area is approximately 
coincident with WPA 4B. Like the RID canal, the Buckeye Canal could be a potential conveyance for a future 
water supply for the City. The BWCDD system was developed to divert and deliver water from the Gila River to 
agricultural users in the 1800s. Depletions of flows to the Gila River by the late 1920s and the negative impacts 
to BWCDD farmers resulted in a lawsuit seeking to enforce their senior priority. 
By the mid-1940s this lawsuit was finally resolved and resulted in Salt River Project (SRP) providing water 
to BWCDD at Granite Reef Dam, RID delivering groundwater to BWCDD to offset depletions by its 
upstream use, and Maricopa Water District (MWD) providing funding for BWCDD operating wells to offset 
depletions of MWD's upstream use on the tributary Agua Fria River. In the late 1940s, the City of Phoenix 
and SRP proposed construction of flood gates on Horseshoe Dam in the Verde River, BWCDD farmers 
filed a lawsuit to prevent further impoundment of water that would otherwise be conveyed to BWCDD. 
This lawsuit resulted in a settlement whereby the City of Phoenix agreed to provide effluent to BWCDD to 
offset diminished flow in the Gila River. 
It is recommended that the City discuss water supply and conveyance options with BWCDD, recognizing 
that the existing agreements between them may facilitate development of mutually beneficial water 
supply solutions. 
3.4.5 
Buckeye Waterlogged Area 
The area known as the Buckeye Waterlogged Area (BWLA) extends approximately 35 miles along the 
Gila River from the confluence of the Salt River to the Gillespie Dam. The BWLA was established in the 
Arizona Revised Statue (A.R.S.) in 1988 (A.R.S. 45-411.01), which includes the following provisions: 
1. BWLA lands are exempt from irrigation duties. 
2. BWLA lands are exempt from conservation requirements for the distribution of groundwater. 
3. Exemptions are granted for a portion of groundwater withdrawal fees from within the BWLA.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-17 
The expiration of these exemptions corresponded to the end of the fifth management period of the 
Phoenix AMA (December 31, 2024). Through House Bill 2078, these provisions were extended through 
December 31, 2034. ADWR is required to issue recommendations on maintaining and extending these 
exemptions beyond the current date by November 15, 2031, after additional review of BWLA hydrologic 
conditions is completed. 
Approximately two-thirds of the BWLA is in Buckeye between the Buckeye Canal and The Gila River. The 
remaining parts of the BWLA include portions of the Cities of Phoenix, Avondale, and Goodyear. The City 
has an agreement with BWCDD to pump 20,000 AFY of groundwater from the BWLA to the Arlington 
Canal, where it is conveyed to the Gila River. This pumping is done to mitigate rising groundwater levels 
that can damage water infrastructure in this area. Currently, nine dewatering wells in the BWLA discharge 
approximately 20,000 AFY. 
The City's service area right enables the City to pump, treat and deliver this water to its customers without 
a replenishment requirement. However, the BWLA water average TDS ranges from 2,750 to 3,470 mg/L 
and would require reverse osmosis (RO) treatment (and brine disposal) to make this a potable source. 
ADWR is in the process of conducting additional hydrogeologic studies, including a projection period 
through the year 2050 to determine if there is justification to extend the pumping exemption beyond 
2034. Based on ADWR's BWLA Review and Recommendation Report (December 2019), the Department 
recommended providing the Arizona governor with a recommendation on extending the pumping 
exemption beyond 2034 by November 2031. It is anticipated that ADWR will consult with impacted 
irrigation districts as well as Cities and Towns (including Buckeye) within the BWLA on the scope of the 
hydrologic review ahead of providing additional recommendations to the Governor of Arizona. 
3.4.6 
Priority 3 or 4 Colorado River Contract Water 
It is possible that Colorado River water rights could be obtained by purchasing land adjacent to the river 
that has historically been used for agriculture and conveying it through the CAP canal to the City. Water 
contracts executed prior to September 30, 1968, are Priority 3 and have a higher delivery priority than the 
CAP. Water contracts executed after this date (including CAP water) are Priority 4. 
This type of water purchase and conveyance through the CAP canal would require review and approval 
from the Secretary of the Interior, ADWR and CAWCD. 
These supplies could be used by the City for recharge and recovery, recharge for long-term storage 
credits, or could be treated and directly delivered to customers if/when the City advances to surface water 
treatment. Priority 3 water would be less susceptible to drought than the City's CAP NIA water due to its 
higher priority on the Colorado River. 
Acquiring these supplies could be challenging due to potential local opposition to fallowing farmland and 
severing water rights in historically agricultural communities. It could also potentially put the City in the 
position of competing with CAWCD as well as other water providers for potential acquisitions and could 
be challenging to gain institutional approval from local, state, and federal entities.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-18 
3.4.7 
Verde River Sediment Mitigation Project 
Bartlett Dam is the lower of two dams on the Verde River system. Accumulation of sediment behind the 
upper dam has reduced storage capacity, which is currently approximately one-third of its 132,000 AF 
design capacity. The USBR, in partnership with the SRP, undertook an appraisal study to collect data and 
stakeholder input. The purpose of this task was to evaluate the needs and perspectives regarding the loss 
of storage capacity of the Verde system. As a result of the appraisal process, the USBR, SRP, and several 
stakeholders started a feasibility study and launched a steering committee to evaluate options to raise 
Bartlett Dam to restore and potentially increase capacity. The City is engaged in this process, which could 
potentially result in additional renewable water resources available to the City. 
The current feasibility study process is expected to last through the year 2025 and has over 20 steering 
committee members. Design and construction of the dam improvements could take up to 10 years beyond 
completion of the feasibility study. There is significant potential for the City to be a participating party and 
gain access to a portion of additional storage and supply in this project. Due to the level of interest in this 
project, the negotiation for specific volumes of water could be challenging. The City is encouraged to stay 
engaged in the process and remain open to developing this supply option in its water portfolio. 
3.4.8 
Long Term Storage Credits 
Without a Designation, the City cannot purchase LTSCs of CAP water from other water providers due to 
A.R.S. 45-802.01.22, which prohibits the issuance of CAP LTSCs of storage water that cannot be used 
directly. Recycled water LTSCs can be purchased without a Designation. 
LTSCs do not provide a physical water supply to the City but can be helpful in offsetting groundwater 
replenishment obligations for groundwater delivered under the City's service area right. 
3.4.9 
Colorado River Indian Tribes Water 
A bill was introduced to the United States Senate, titled the "Colorado River Indian Tribes Water Resiliency 
Act of 2022 (S 3308)" that was signed into law in January 2023. This bill creates the authority to allow the 
Colorado River Indian Tribes (CRIT) to provide short-term water supply for entities experience droughts or 
shortages across Arizona. This act is consistent with the authority already granted to other tribes. Water 
delivered off-reservation is limited to water historically consumed by the CRIT. This water could be made 
available through fallowing farming operations, moving to less water-intensive crops, or implementing 
more efficient irrigation systems. 
The City should look for opportunities to develop lease agreements with the CRIT to obtain short and 
long-term renewable supplies. The City would also need to consider conveyance through existing canals 
(CAP, SRP, RID, BWCDD, etc.) as well as identify end uses (i.e., recharge and recovery projects or treatment 
and direct delivery to customers). 
3.4.10 Partnerships 
The City should look for opportunities to form partnerships with other communities and/or water 
suppliers to obtain additional water supplies. Partnerships that have been developed with other 
communities have included agreements where a water supply is developed, treated, and/or wheeled 
through existing infrastructure to the benefit of all parties.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-19 
3.4.11 
Regional Projects 
The City may benefit from regional infrastructure projects that develop and deliver water supplies. These 
types of projects may include public private partnerships where private funding can make a project 
economically viable. In addition to water supplies, regional projects could also include desalination where 
a private partnership provides funding, and the brine or RO concentrate is treated to help make brackish 
groundwater a viable water source. By participating with other communities, economies of scale could 
make brine management more economically viable. 
3.5 
Designation of Assured Water Supply 
The City may seek to obtain a DAWS, which will enable the City to promote coordinated and orderly 
development through the allocation of water resources. It will also support strategic management of the 
City's water resources that will sustain economic development and provide a mechanism for establishing a 
funding basis (i.e., a water resources impact fee) for providing water and the associated infrastructure 
necessary to deliver it to citizens. 
Currently, there are more than two dozen major developments that have obtained a CAWS in the City. 
When Certificates are issued, they are associated to a specific lot with a legal description and cannot be 
transferred. They also do not expire and those Certificates that have already been issued for undeveloped 
lots represent significant growth potential for the City. 
The Certificates that have been issued in the City identify enrollment in the CAGRD as the means for 
meeting the consistency with the management goal requirement of the Phoenix AMA. With this approach, 
the individual homeowners are responsible for paying the groundwater replenishment fees (through their 
property tax) to offset the groundwater that is delivered to them by the City. 
When an area is Designated, the groundwater replenishment obligation becomes the responsibility of the 
Designated municipal provider. If the City were to transition to a DAWS for all or a portion of its service 
area, the City would be responsible for groundwater replenishment, including CAGRD replenishment fees 
if the CAGRD is the mechanism used to demonstrate consistency with the management goal of the 
Phoenix AMA. 
Through a series of workshops, a strategy was developed to identify opportunities for establishing a 
Designation in one or more parts of the City. This approach was discussed with ADWR and can advance 
provided that the following guiding principles are met: 
 The Designated area is hydraulically separate from parts of the City that have active Certificates. The 
reason for this is due to the potential for commingling of groundwater and surface water in the same 
system, which currently is not allowed by statute between areas that are Designated and areas that are 
not. 
 The City must demonstrate physical, legal, and continuous availability of supplies pledged in a 
Designation. Therefore, renewable water resources pledged to a Designated area cannot be 
simultaneously pledged to serve demands in another Designated or Certificated area. 
 Certificates previously issued in the area to be Designated become inactive, with the possibility of 
becoming active again if the Designation was not renewed or revoked. While a CAWS is issued for 
100 years, a DAWS must be renewed at least every 15 years. The inactivation of Certificates previously

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-20 
issued in an area that becomes Designated protects the property owners who obtained Certificates if 
maintaining a Designation in that area is no longer possible. 
 In instances where recharge and recovery are intended, the City must demonstrate that both recharge 
and recovery capacity are established for a renewable supply to be recognized and pledged to a 
Designation. In practical terms, this means that the intent to recharge reclaimed water is not sufficient 
to demonstrate recharge capacity. Rather, the City must demonstrate that there is physical system 
capacity to deliver and recharge water and that the project is permittable (defined as both WS and USF 
permits are either in place or far enough along in the ADWR review process that there is reasonable 
certainty the facility will be granted permits at a known capacity). 
 Potential new renewable supplies pledged to a Designation must be justified with executed contracts 
identifying volumes and time frames for delivery. 
 ADWR may consider an infrastructure phasing plan when deciding whether to recognize a new supply. 
However, the City would need to demonstrate timeframes for deployment of supplies, acquisition of 
land rights and/or easements and that the permitting process has begun. 
The following sections describe a phased approach to obtaining multiple Designations throughout the 
City's service area. Due to the size of the City and significant distances between established areas and 
growth areas, the City's complete water system is not hydraulically connected. Therefore, it would not be 
feasible to obtain a single DAWS for the entire City. 
The phased approach allows the City to target specific growth areas in parts of the City most impacted by 
ADWR's June 2023 announcement regarding limited groundwater physical availability in the Phoenix 
AMA. Establishing a Designation in these areas enables the City to begin building a foundation of 
renewable water supplies and infrastructure that will support development in both the near-term and the 
year 2040 planning horizon. These growth areas are expected to be a subset of WPAs. The initial 
Designation will also provide a basis for the City to work collaboratively with developers to develop 
supplies and construct infrastructure or to recover the costs borne by the City to bring new, renewable 
water resources to the City. 
Within a Designation, the City must identify separately the current, committed, and projected demands 
for the service area. These demand components are defined in statute and summarized as follows: 
 Current Demands – potable, non-potable, and non-revenue water demand for the "current" or 
existing system. 
 Committed Demands – demand associated with recorded, undeveloped lots. Typically, these 
demands are assigned a unit factor ranging between 0.3 AFY per lot (AFY/lot) to 0.4 AFY/lot. 
 Projected Demands – demand from lots that are anticipated to be recorded, other customer demands 
through the term of a Designation. 
The sections below identify the total demands required to be met as well as estimates of the current, 
committed, and projected demand for each WPA. The WPAs and regional water resources features, and 
infrastructure is shown in Figure 3.1.

WR F
WR F
WR F
WR F
!ã!ã
!ã!ã
Gila Bend
Hassayampa
West Salt
River Valley
Rainbow
Valley
Roosevelt Irrigation District Canal
Beardsley Canal
Gila Bend Canal
Arlington Canal
Buckeye Canal
assayampa River
Recharge Facility
6
1
3
5
2
4A
4B
Last Revised: July 02, 2025 pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/AZ/Buckeye/201866-000000/02 Project Information/03 Data/GIS/Bukey_DAWS.aprx
O
0
4.5
2.25
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this figure are for planning
purposes and represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy is not implied.
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 3.1 Water Resources Service Area
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
!ã
Well
WR F
Existing Water Reclamation
Facility
Existing Recharge Facilities
Reclaimed Water Pipes
Canal
Underground Storage Facility
Buckeye Water Conservation
and Drainage District
Roosevelt Irrigation District
ADWR Groundwater Sub-basin
Buckeye Water Logged Area
City of Buckeye Planning Area
Water Planning Area

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-22 
3.5.1 
WPA 1 
WPA 1 is the northernmost portion of the City, between the eastern and western municipal planning area 
boundary and north of Peoria Avenue. Master Planned developments in WPA 1 include Floreo at Teravalis 
(Floreo), Festival Ranch, North Star Ranch, Sun Valley Villages, and Teravalis. There is current development 
within Festival Ranch including some Certificated lots that have not yet developed. The Floreo 
development also has Certificates but is not yet developed. 
Table 3.6 summarizes the projected water demands, assumed renewable supplies available and the 
additional renewable supplies required to serve WPA 1 for the years 2025 through 2040 planning horizon 
and for Buildout. 
Table 3.6 
WPA 1 Water Resources and Demand  
Description 
Average Annual Water Demand or Supply (AFY) 
Year 2025 
Year 2030 
Year 2035 
Year 2040 
Buildout 
Water Demand(1) 
1,900 
3,600 
4,000 
4,700 
85,400 
Renewable Supply 
 
 
 
 
 
Reclaimed Water(2) 
100  
800  
1,000  
1,300  
39,900  
Phase-in Groundwater(3) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Incidental Recharge(4) 
76  
144 
160  
188  
3,416 
CAP M&I(5) 
68 
68 
68 
68 
68 
CAP NIA(6) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Total Renewable Supply 
244  
1,012 
1,228 
1,556 
43,384 
Water Demand/Renewable 
Supply Surplus or (Deficit) 
(1,656) 
(2,588) 
(2,772) 
(3,144) 
(42,016) 
Notes: 
(1) Total water demand, including non-revenue water. 
(2) The first 900 AFY of reclaimed water produced in this area is conveyed to the Festival Golf Course for irrigation. Additional reclaimed 
water volumes would be available to the City as a reclaimed water resource. 
(3) Phase-in groundwater allowance is not assumed to be granted by ADWR if a DAWS is obtained after the year 2025. 
(4) Calculated as 4 percent of the total demand. 
(5) Assumed long-term CAP M&I allocation of 25 AFY (City) plus 43 AFY (Valencia Water Company conveyed to the City in 2017). 
(6) Assumed the City's CAP NIA allocation of 2,786 AFY is not available to be pledged towards a Designation. 
Based on the projected demands for the year 2025, the City would not have sufficient renewable water 
resources to establish a Designation in WPA 1 unless it acquired an additional 1,656 AFY of renewable 
supply. This conclusion assumes: 
 The City's CAP NIA allocation is not available to be pledged towards a Designation. 
 The maximum required reclaimed water deliveries to the Sun City Festival Golf Course are 900 AFY. 
For the years 2030 through 2040, the City will need to continue to obtain additional renewable supplies to 
meet the projected demands or demonstrate sufficient groundwater physical availability and the 
associated CAGRD replenishment capacity to meet between 2,588 and 3,144 AFY of water demand, 
beyond the City's currently estimated renewable supplies for WPA 1.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-23 
As reclaimed water becomes available in WPA 1, it is critical that the City's reclaimed water production, 
recharge and recovery capacity is sized to be equal to or greater than the estimated volumes of reclaimed 
water that are anticipated to be available to the City after deliveries for golf course irrigation. This will 
require reclaimed water recharge and recovery capacity of at least 800 AFY for year 2030 and 1,300 AFY 
for year 2040. 
If the City acquires the following supplies discussed in Section 3.4, any of these could be used to meet 
WPA 1 demands: 
 Priority three or four Colorado River Contract Water delivered through the CAP canal. 
 Bartlett Dam New Conservation Space (NCS) (if an agreement was developed between the City and 
another entity to exchange Bartlett Dam NCS water with CAP water that could be delivered through 
the CAP canal). 
 CRIT water delivered through the CAP canal. 
 Imported groundwater from the Harquahala INA delivered through the CAP canal or other constructed 
conveyance. 
 Long-term agreements for water delivery with developers. 
Table 3.7 summarizes the growth potential for WPA 1, which is represented by both the committed and 
projected demands. Committed demands are defined as stated in Section 3.5 to represent the recorded, 
undeveloped lots that are anticipated to develop through Buildout. The projected demands represent 
additional growth that is expected to occur through the year 2040. 
Table 3.7 
WPA 1 Growth Potential 
Demand Component 
WPA 1 (AFY) 
Current (Exiting Connections, year 2023) 
1,800 
Committed (Recorded, Undeveloped Lots through Buildout) 
2,700 
Projected through 2040 
1,500 
Total 
6,000 
As an example, assuming an average unit water demand of 0.4 AFY/lot which is the water use assumption 
by ADWR, the committed demands in WPA 1 are equivalent to approximately 6,750 homes (2,700 AFY / 
[0.4 AFY/lot] = 6,750 lots). This represents the growth that could occur under the existing Certificates and 
can be achieved regardless of whether the City obtains a DAWS. The additional 1,500 AFY of demand 
through the year 2040 planning period is equivalent to approximately 3,750 homes. This growth is most 
likely to occur if the City were to obtain a Designation. It is still possible that this development could occur 
with Certificates; however, they would need to identify a source of supply other than groundwater, to be 
consistent with ADWR's June 2023 statement regarding limited groundwater availability for new growth in 
the Phoenix AMA.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-24 
3.5.2 
WPA 2 
WPA 2 is located in northern Buckeye between the western municipal planning area boundary and the 
west side of the White Tank Mountains, and between Northern Avenue on the north and the I-10 freeway 
on the south. Master Planned developments in WPA 2 include Elianto, Sun Valley South, Tartesso, Tartesso 
West, Valle Del Rio, and Valle Del Sol. There is current development within Tartesso and Tartesso West 
including some Certificated lots that have not yet developed. The Elianto development also has 
Certificates but is not yet developed. The City is currently in the process of securing an Alternative 
Designation of Assured Water Supply in WPA 2. 
Table 3.8 summarizes the projected water demands, assumed renewable supplies available and the 
additional renewable supplies required to serve WPAs 1 and 2 for the years 2025 through 2040 planning 
horizon and for Buildout. 
Table 3.8 
WPA 2 Water Resources and Demand 
Description 
Average Annual Water Demand or Supply (AFY) 
Year 2025 
Year 2030 
Year 2035 
Year 2040 
Buildout 
Water Demand(1) 
1,600 
1,900 
2,500 
3,000 
43,400 
Renewable Supply 
 
 
 
 
 
Reclaimed Water(2) 
700 
900 
1,200 
1,500 
20,700 
Phase-in Groundwater(3) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Incidental Recharge(4) 
64 
76 
100 
120 
1,736 
CAP M&I(5) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
CAP NIA(5) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Total Renewable Supply 
764 
976 
1,300 
1,620 
22,436 
Water Demand/ Renewable 
Supply Surplus or (Deficit) 
(836) 
(924) 
(1,200) 
(1,380) 
(20,964) 
Notes: 
(1) Total water demand, including non-revenue water. 
(2) The reclaimed water used for the Alternative Designation of Assured Water Supply (ADAWS) will be subject to a 25% cut to the aquifer.  
(3) Phase-in Groundwater allowance is not assumed to be granted by ADWR if a DAWS is obtained after the year 2025. 
(4) Calculated as 4 percent of the total demand. 
(5) Assumed CAP M&I and NIA water pledged to WPA 1. 
The City is working to obtain an ADAWS for WPA 2. Based on the projected demand for the year 2025, the 
City would need to demonstrate 836 AFY of renewable water resources to establish an ADAWS in WPA 2. 
The City would need to demonstrate 924 AFY of renewable supplies by the year 2030 and 1,380 AFY of 
renewable supplies by the year 2040 to maintain the ADAWS. This conclusion assumes: 
 The City's CAP NIA allocation is not available to be pledged towards a Designation. 
 Reclaimed water generated at the Tartesso Water Reclamation Facility will be stored and recovered as 
an additional water supply.  
 The City's reclaimed water production, recharge and recovery capacity is equal to or greater than 
700 AF for year 2025 and up to 1,500 AFY for year 2040. 
If the City chooses to extend the Designated Service Area into WPA 1, it will require the City to obtain 
additional renewable supplies. It will also require that the water supply infrastructure between WPAs 1 
and 2 be hydraulically connected.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-25 
If the City acquires the following supplies discussed in Section 3.4, any of these could be used to meet 
WPA 2 demands: 
 Priority 3 or 4 Colorado River Contract Water delivered through the CAP canal. 
 Bartlett Dam NCS (if an agreement was developed between the City and another entity to exchange 
Bartlett Dam NCS water with CAP water that could be delivered through the CAP canal). 
 CRIT water delivered through the CAP canal. 
 Imported groundwater from the Harquahala Irrigation Non-expansion Area (INA) delivered through 
the CAP canal or other constructed conveyance. 
Table 3.9 summarizes the growth potential for WPA 2, which is represented by both the committed and 
projected demands. Committed demands are defined as stated in Section 3.5 to represent the recorded, 
undeveloped lots that are anticipated to develop through Buildout. The projected demands represent 
additional growth that is expected to occur through the year 2040. 
Table 3.9 
WPA 2 Growth Potential 
Demand Component 
WPAs 1 and 2 (AFY) 
Current (Exiting Connections, year 2023) 
1,400 
Committed (Recorded, Undeveloped Lots through Buildout) 
2,900 
Projected through 2040 
1,400 
Total 
5,700 
Assuming an average unit water demand of 0.4 AFY/lot, the committed demand in WPA 2 is equivalent to 
approximately 7,250 homes (2,900 AFY / [0.4 AFY/lot] = 7,250 lots). This represents the growth that could 
occur under the existing Certificates and can be achieved regardless of whether the City obtains a DAWS. 
The additional 1,400 AFY of demand through the year 2040 planning period is equivalent to 
approximately 3,500 homes.  
3.5.3 
WPA 4A and 4B 
WPA 4A is located in central Buckeye between Johnson Road on the west, the eastern municipal planning 
area boundary on the east, the RID canal on the north and the Buckeye Canal on the south. Master 
Planned developments in WPA 4A include Copper Falls and Henry Park. WPA 4B is located in central 
Buckeye, south of WPA 4A between the Buckeye Canal on the north, the Gila River on the south and the 
City's municipal planning boundary on the east and west. WPA 3 is located north of WPA 4A and has 
limited water supply potential because surface water supplies from the canals are not a possibility and the 
aquifer is thinner, limiting groundwater supplies. Therefore, the priority in this plan is to focus on 
WPAs 4A and 4B in this IWMP. There are no Master Planned communities in WPA 4B. 
Table 3.10 summarizes the projected water demands, assumed renewable supplies available and the 
additional renewable supplies required to serve WPAs 4A and 4B for the years 2025 through 2040 
planning horizon and for Buildout.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-26 
Table 3.10 
WPAs 4A and 4B Water Resources and Demand  
Description 
Average Annual Water Demand or Supply (AFY) 
Year 2025 
Year 2030 
Year 2035 
Year 2040 
Buildout 
Water Demand(1) 
4,700  
6,300  
7,600  
9,500  
40,600  
Renewable Supply 
 
 
 
 
 
Reclaimed Water(2) 
1,400  
2,200  
2,900  
3,700  
18,600  
Phase-in Groundwater(3) 
115 
115 
115 
115 
115 
Incidental Recharge(4) 
188  
252  
304  
380  
1,624  
CAP M&I(5) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
CAP NIA(5) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Total Renewable Supply 
1,703  
2,567  
3,319  
4,195  
20,339  
Water Demand/ Renewable 
Supply Surplus or (Deficit) 
(2,997) 
(3,733) 
(4,281) 
(5,305) 
(20,261) 
Notes: 
(1) Total water demand, including non-revenue water. 
(2) Assumes 800 AFY of reclaimed water produced in this area is conveyed for non-potable reuse. The remainder of reclaimed water 
produced is assumed to be available for recharge and recovery. 
(3) Phase-in Groundwater allowance is assumed to be granted by ADWR for developments in Buckeye that were served by groundwater 
prior to the 1995 AWS Rules. 
(4) Calculated as 4 percent of the total demand. 
(5) Assumed CAP M&I and NIA water pledged to WPA 1. 
Based on the projected demand for the year 2025, the City does not have sufficient renewable water 
resources to establish a Designation in WPAs 4A and/ or 4B. Between 2,997 and 5,305 AFY of additional 
renewable supplies are needed to meet projected demands for the years 2025 and 2040, respectively. This 
conclusion assumes: 
 The reclaimed water deliveries for non-potable reuse do not exceed 800 AFY. 
 The City's reclaimed water production, recharge and recovery capacity is equal to or greater than 
1,400 AFY for year 2025 and can be expanded to 3,700 AFY by year 2040. 
Extending the Designated service area into WPA 4A and/ or 4B or establishing separate Designations for 
WPAs 4A and 4B will require the City to obtain additional renewable supplies to meet the projected 
demands or demonstrate sufficient groundwater physical availability and the associated CAGRD 
replenishment capacity to meet between 2,997 and 5,305 AFY of water demand, beyond the City's 
currently estimated renewable supplies for WPAs 4A and 4B. 
If the City acquires the following supplies discussed in Section 3.4, any of these could be used to meet 
WPAs 1 and 2 demands: 
 Priority 3 or 4 Colorado River Contract Water delivered through exchanges to the RID or Buckeye 
canal. 
 Bartlett Dam NCS (if an agreement was developed between the City and another entity to wheel water 
through the RID or Buckeye canal). 
 CRIT water delivered through exchanges to the RID or Buckeye canal. 
 Imported groundwater from the Harquahala INA delivered through the CAP canal/ exchanges or 
another constructed conveyance. 
 Other surface water supplies delivered through the RID or Buckeye Canals.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-27 
Table 3.11 summarizes the growth potential for WPAs 4A and 4B, which is represented by both the 
committed and projected demands. Committed demands are defined as stated in Section 3.5 to represent 
the recorded, undeveloped lots that are anticipated to develop through Buildout. The projected demands 
represent additional growth that is expected to occur through the year 2040. 
Table 3.11 
WPAs 4A and 4B Growth Potential 
Demand Component 
WPAs 4A and 4B (AFY) 
Current (Exiting Connections, Year 2023) 
3,200 
Committed (Recorded, Undeveloped Lots through Buildout) 
3,900 
Projected through 2040 
3,700 
Total 
10,800 
Assuming an average unit water demand of 0.4 AFY/lot, the committed demands in WPAs 4A and 4B are 
equivalent to approximately 9,750 homes (3,900 AFY/[0.4 AFY/lot] = 9,750 lots). This represents the 
growth that could occur under the existing Certificates and can be achieved regardless of whether the City 
obtains a DAWS. The additional 3,700 AFY of demand through the year 2040 planning period is equivalent 
to approximately 9,250 homes. 
Table 3.12 summarizes the growth potential for WPAs 1, 2, 4A, and 4B, which is represented by both the 
committed and projected demands. 
Table 3.12 
WPAs Growth Potential – Water Demand 
Demand Component 
Average Annual Demand (AFY) 
WPA 1 
WPA 2 
WPA 4A 
WPA 4B 
Total 
Current (Exiting Connections, 
Year 2023) 
1,800 
1,400 
2,300 
900 
6,400 
Committed (Recorded, Undeveloped 
Lots through Buildout) 
2,700 
2,900 
3,800 
100 
9,500 
Projected through 2040 
1,500 
1,400 
2,600 
1,100 
6,600 
Total 
6,000 
5,700 
8,700 
2,100 
22,500 
Table 3.13 summarizes the number of potential lots that can be built based on the WPA growth potential. 
Table 3.13 
WPAs Growth Potential – Potential Lots 
Demand Component 
Estimated Number of Residential Lots(1) 
WPA 1 
WPA 2 
WPA 4A 
WPA 4B 
Total 
Committed (Recorded, Undeveloped 
Lots through Buildout) 
6,750 
7,250 
9,500 
250 
23,750 
Projected through 2040 
3,750 
3,500 
6,500 
2,750 
16,500 
Total 
10,500 
10,750 
16,000 
3,000 
40,250 
Note: 
(1) Assumes 0.4 AFY water demand per lot.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
3-28 
There are approximately 23,750 currently Certificated lots that could be built in WPAs 1, 2, 4A, and 4B. 
Note that the City's estimate of currently certificated lots is approximately 26,000. This difference likely 
results in varying actual unit water demands per lot on the actual certificates, which range from 0.3 to 
0.4 AFY/lot, as noted in Section 3.5. There are an additional estimated 16,500 lots that could be built 
through the year 2040 if the City were to obtain a DAWS. In order to serve the current, committed and 
projected demand for WPAs 1, 2, 4A and 4B through the year 2040 would require the City to acquire and 
maintain approximately 22,500 AFY of renewable water supplies. 
3.6 
Recommendations 
The following recommendations are provided to guide the City with respect to water resources planning 
and obtaining a DAWS: 
1. Maximize underground water storage within the City's service area and within the AOHI of the City's 
recovery wells to promote restoration of groundwater levels and maintain groundwater physical 
availability. 
2. Develop recharge and recovery projects specifically for reclaimed water to maximize the benefit of 
this valuable resource in the City's water portfolio. Demonstrating that the City can utilize 100 percent 
of its reclaimed water supply will be critical to obtaining a Designation. 
3. Continue to engage with SRP in discussions regarding Bartlett Dam NCS surface water. 
4. Stay informed of and pursue opportunities for water exchanges, Priority 3 or 4 Colorado River water 
rights, CRIT leases, or other supply acquisitions that are advantageous to the City. 
5. Continue to progress concepts and infrastructure needed to bring Harquahala groundwater to the 
City, including discussions with CAWCD regarding conveyance of imported groundwater through the 
CAP canal. 
6. Identify and engage in potential future opportunities to partner or exchange water resources with 
neighboring communities. 
7. Continue discussions with RID and BWCDD for both water supply and water conveyance 
opportunities that may be advantageous to the City. 
8. Explore opportunities to have new developments (including high water use industries) bring 
renewable supplies with them as a condition of development approval. 
9. Continue advancement of the City's water conservation program, strengthened by public policy to 
drive effective demand reduction results. 
10. Continue discussions with ADWR regarding obtaining an ADAWS for WPA 2 and to specifically 
identify what will be needed to demonstrate physical, legal, and continuous availability of water 
supply to WPA 1.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-1 
CHAPTER 4 WATER MASTER PLAN 
4.1 
Introduction 
Chapter 4 presents the water system evaluation for the City as part of the 2025 IWMP. The purpose of the 
IWMP is to identify the water system infrastructure needed for growth and capacity improvements to 
serve the City's needs through the 2030, 2035, and 2040 infrastructure planning periods. The timing of 
many infrastructure additions is set based on growth or flow triggers that are set to determine when the 
infrastructure is required. To develop the Master Plan, a hydraulic model was prepared to evaluate the 
capacity of the distribution system in each infrastructure planning period. Proposed future infrastructure 
was evaluated, the timing of future water supply infrastructure expansions was determined, and a plan for 
future distribution system expansion was developed. Actual development in the future may occur 
differently than planned, and adjustments may need to be made in infrastructure construction to align 
with development. 
The outline of this chapter is as follows: 
1. Water System Overview – This section contains a summary of the overall water system and the 
strategies that will be implemented in the plan. 
2. Performance Criteria – This section documents the performance criteria used to evaluate water 
system infrastructure, which is based to a large extent on the City's EDS. 
3. Water Model – This section explains the hydraulic model and software used in the IWMP. 
4. Master Plan by Water Service Area – This section presents the Master Plan, including infrastructure 
projects arranged by these water service areas: Sun City Festival, Floreo at Teravalis (Floreo), Tartesso, 
and Central Buckeye. The discussion on each water service area contains the following subsections: 
a. 2024 Water Infrastructure Description. 
b. Demand Projections and Planned Future Infrastructure. 
c. 
Water Distribution System Evaluation. 
d. Water System Infrastructure Improvement Program. 
5. Conclusions and Recommendations – This section summarizes major recommendations for the City.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-2 
4.2 
Water System Overview 
This IWMP study area covers those portions of the City that are north of the Gila River and that do not 
receive water service from EPCOR and Arizona Water Company. The study area covers approximately 
432 square miles, although a portion of the land is mountainous and will not be developed. In the first 
phase of the IWMP, the planning area was grouped into six different WPAs (formerly called DAWS 
planning areas) that were originally seen as areas that could possibly become a designation of AWS. Even 
without a DAWS, these geographical areas are significant because each area has a different water supply 
strategy and, in some cases, has hydraulically separate service areas. 
This IWMP covers growth through 2040, which is only a portion of the land in each DAWS planning area. 
The land areas planned for growth include developments that have a CAWS and land zoned industrial or 
commercial that may not need a CAWS if land parcels are not subdivided into more than six parcels. The 
land parcels are grouped by the planning periods within which the land is expected to develop: 2030, 
2035, and 2040. Therefore, the infrastructure planned in this Master Plan focuses on the land areas 
planned for development before 2040. 
Figure 4.1 presents the WPAs and the land areas that are planned to develop by 2040, colored by 
planning period.

ntersburg
74
Circle City
Wittmann
Morristown
10
10
Dixie
Allenville
Palo Verde
Buckeye
60
Liberty
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
WPA 1
WPA 3
WPA 5
WPA 2
WPA 4A
WPA 4B
Festival
Ranch
Festival
Ranch
Teravalis
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
North Star
Ranch
Farallon
WTP 5
WTP 11
Westpark WTP
Floreo WTP
Tartesso WTP
Cipriani WTP
Sun City
Festival WTP
Grand
View WTP
Sundance
North Airport
Jackie A.
Meck WC
Last Revised: October 29, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 4.1  Water Planning Areas and Development Planning Periods
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning Area
3
Q
Water Campus or WTP
3
Q
Proposed WTP
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community
Tartesso West
Elianto
West Phoenix Estates
Sun Valley South
Buckeye Canal
RID Canal

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-4 
4.2.1 
WPA Water Infrastructure Development Strategy 
Each WPA has unique water supplies and water supply strategies that influence the infrastructure that is 
being planned in each WPA. This section provides background information, and the reasoning behind the 
water supply strategies to be employed in each WPA, and then a more detailed evaluation of each area is 
presented in Section 2.5. 
4.2.1.1 
WPA 1 
WPA 1 currently includes two developments: the Sun City Festival development and the Floreo 
development. Sun City Festival is currently partially developed and is expected to fully develop by 2040. 
Floreo is currently being constructed. Both developments have a CAWS. Water for both developments is 
supplied by wells. 
The City has a CAP allocation and a NIA allocation. In addition, the City has acquired a water allocation 
from the Harquahala Valley that could be delivered via the CAP canal after the City takes possession of 
the water. In addition, the City is participating in raising the Bartlett Dam that will provide additional water 
supplies that could be delivered via the CAP canal through an exchange. By 2040, the City may be able to 
construct a surface water treatment plant (SWTP) that treats surface water from the CAP canal. This 
treated water can serve the Sun City Festival development, and a transmission main could be constructed 
along Sun Valley Parkway to serve the Floreo development. 
WPA 1 also includes the Sun Valley Villages development south of the CAP canal. North of the canal, there 
is the North Star Ranch, additional Sun City Festival development, and Teravalis developments. None of 
these primarily residential developments have a CAWS, although North Star Ranch has a small amount of 
surface water. Because these developments do not have a CAWS or a sufficient water supply, these 
developments are not expected to begin developing by 2040 unless additional water supplies can be 
obtained earlier. 
4.2.1.2 
WPA 2 
WPA 2 currently has the Tartesso and West Phoenix Estates developments. Both developments are supplied 
by wells. Additional planned developments include Elianto, Tartesso West, Tartesso East, and Sun Valley 
South. 
The Tartesso water system is planned to expand to include the other developments with a DAWS. Water 
infrastructure will be added and interconnected as development occurs, so the water system increases in 
reliability as additional wells are added. In the future, if water supplies are obtained that could be 
delivered through the CAP canal, a treatment plant may be constructed at the CAP canal, and a 
transmission main may be constructed down the Sun Valley Parkway, then the Tartesso water system 
could be augmented with surface water. 
The West Phoenix Estates development is an established area that is currently served by two wells. The 
wells need to be rehabilitated, so the West Phoenix Estates development could be connected to the 
Tartesso water system indefinitely to obtain a water supply.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-5 
Commercial development along Sun Valley Parkway is being planned, as well as a development that 
includes a hospital located east of the Sun Valley Parkway and north of I-10. The development along Sun 
Valley Parkway would receive water from Tartesso and is not expected to require a CAWS. The new 
development east of Sun Valley Parkway does not have a CAWS and will have a separate water system 
that is the responsibility of the developer and, therefore, not included in the IWMP. 
4.2.1.3 
WPA 3, 4A, and 4B 
WPA 3, 4A, and 4B comprise Central Buckeye. Currently, water in each planning area comes from wells. 
These planning areas were established based on the possibility of serving each planning area using 
surface water in the future at some time beyond the 2040 planning period of this IWMP. In the future, 
water that could come from the RID Canal and the BWCDD Canal would likely need to be used exclusively 
within the service area of each canal. WPA 3 is located north of the RID Canal and, therefore, would not be 
eligible for surface water from either canal. WPA 4A covers the service area of the RID Canal, and WPA 4B 
covers the service area of the BWCDD Canal. As the City grows and works to acquire additional water 
resources, the infrastructure needed to deliver water should consider the possibility of infrastructure 
required to deliver surface water. 
The water delivery system in Central Buckeye is mostly connected except for the City airport water system 
in WPA 3 and Bulfer water system in WPA 4A that operate as stand-alone water systems. These two 
isolated water systems could become connected to the rest of the water system as growth reaches these 
areas, but connection is not expected by 2040. 
WPA 3 currently has two groundwater treatment facilities: Sundance WTP and North Airport Road WTP. 
The Sundance WTP was planned to serve only the Sundance development. Wells delivering water to the 
Sundance WTP are located primarily in the Sundance development. Additional wells, storage, and 
treatment is being planned for the Sundance site. The North Airport Road WTP obtains water from two 
nearby wells. A third well was drilled recently and is being equipped. Additional wells are planned that 
would send water to the North Airport Road WTP, which will eventually require additional treatment, 
storage, and pumping expansions to manage the additional well water. Water from the North Airport 
Road WTP can serve any part of the Central Buckeye water delivery system. The City has a 12-inch pipeline 
connection to the EPCOR water system so that any City water right that can be delivered through the CAP 
canal can be delivered to the White Tanks WTP and then wheeled to Buckeye to the water distribution 
system in WPA 3. These water rights include the City's CAP allocation, the NIA allocation, Harquahala 
water, and additional water supplies obtained from raising the Bartlett Dam. Water from the Bartlett Dam 
would need to be delivered through an exchange with another municipality or wheeled through SRP and 
RID canals.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-6 
The Cipriani development, located primarily in WPA 3 in western Central Buckeye, was recently converted 
from being primarily a residential area to an industrial area so that growth can occur without requiring a 
CAWS and may include data centers. Cipriani is likely to develop before adjacent areas, so Cipriani will 
need to be a stand-alone water system with its own wells and WTP up to 2040. The City currently operates 
Wells 12, 13, and 14, which are located just west of Cipriani. This water is currently delivered to Historic 
Buckeye. The water rights for these wells are held by the landowner. When the land begins to develop, 
possibly in the next couple years, water from these wells will supply developments on the landowner's 
land, and Historic Buckeye will need to be supplied through the Reach pipeline from the North Airport 
Road WTP. Cipriani may be served by Wells 12, 13, and 14, as well as additional wells. These wells 
currently do not require treatment, so the need for treatment in Cipriani will depend on groundwater 
quality from new wells. 
The Westpark (WSF-2) WTP will be located in the Westpark development and will serve the area between 
the RID canal and I-10, west of Palo Verde Road and generally east of SR-85. Wells will be developed 
within Westpark and generally within the portion of Westpark that was previously in the 
Westwind/SilverRock areas. 
WPA 4A has two groundwater treatment facilities: Jackie A. Meck and Farallon WTPs. The Jackie A. Meck 
WTP is planned to treat up to 16 mgd of groundwater. The Jackie A. Meck WTP currently has arsenic 
treatment, and RO treatment is planned. Once the RO treatment processes are constructed, brine from 
the RO treatment process will be delivered to the 96-inch Arizona Public Service (APS) pipeline when the 
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is accepting brine. When APS is not accepting brine, the City will 
endeavor to manage well pumping so that the wells requiring RO treatment are not used . The City is 
planning to make the Jackie A. Meck WTP a regional water supply facility. Water to supply the Jackie A. 
Meck WTP will come from nearby wells when possible, and when not, water will need to come from wells 
farther to the east. The Farallon WTP is under construction and will initially receive water from two wells 
that have wellhead RO treatment. Additional wells and water treatment equipment will be added to serve 
growth as it occurs. The Farallon WTP is planned to serve land east of State Route 85 (SR 85), but there 
are sleeves across the highway to connect a water distribution system on the west side of SR 85, so 
Farallon could serve development west of SR 85 until water supply infrastructure can be constructed. 
Three additional WTFs are planned in WPA 4A: WTP 5,WTP 11, and Grand View WTP. WTP 5 is planned to 
be located near the intersection of Turner Road and Southern Avenue along the Zone 1 and Zone 2 
boundary so water can be easily delivered to both zones. If well water pumping capacity or quality is 
limited near WTP 5, then wells would be constructed to the west, closer to the Hassayampa River channel, 
where water may be more plentiful and have a lower TDS level. WTP 11 is planned on the north side of 
the BWCDD canal and west of Verrado Way to serve the Liberty area which is located in the southeast 
corner of Central Buckeye when growth occurs. The water supply would come from new wells constructed 
in the vicinity of WTP 11. The Grand View WTP is planned just north of the Buckeye Canal on Dean Road. 
This plant will be co-located with the Grand View WRF which will provide the City with the option of 
advanced water purification in the future in addition to surface water treatment from the canal. This WTP 
will serve a portion of the City generally between MC-85 and the RID canal, east of Dean Road. Depending 
on the well water quality, RO may be required.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-7 
The portion of Historic Buckeye in WPA 4B has older, smaller water mains that are susceptible to breaks if 
water pressures are too high. For this reason, portions of Historic Buckeye operate at a lower pressure 
than adjacent lands. The City has been working towards replacing these mains, and when the mains are 
replaced, then Historic Buckeye will operate at the same hydraulic grade line (HGL) as Pressure Zone 1. 
WPA 4B does not currently have any potable wells or water supply facilities because WPA 4B is located in 
the BWLA and has brackish groundwater that would require RO treatment to obtain water that is suitable 
for potable water use. Currently, groundwater can be withdrawn from this area without a groundwater 
replenishment obligation until at least 2034 or a later date, depending on a ruling to be made by the 
ADWR in 2034. Due to uncertainty in how the ADWR will make future decisions regarding the 
replenishment obligation in the BWLA, and due to the cost of RO treatment, brackish groundwater 
treatment is not planned by 2040. Water supplies to serve WPA 4B will need to come from WPA 3 and 
WPA 4A. Beyond 2040, water supplies serving WPA 4B could come from an RO facility that uses brackish 
groundwater or the Buckeye Canal if a water resource is obtained for water in that canal. 
WPA 5 does not receive water from Buckeye, and therefore, this area is not evaluated in this IWMP. Most of 
WPA 5 is served by EPCOR with some water service being provided by Arizona Water Company. The City has no 
plans to serve water to these areas in the future. Buckeye does provide wastewater service to a portion of WPA 5. 
4.3 
Water System Performance Criteria 
Performance criteria define the requirements for an adequately designed water distribution system. 
Performance criteria include items such as water supply redundancy, water system reliability, storage, 
pumping, minimum pressures, fire flow, and operational requirements. Performance criteria are more 
general than design criteria, providing specific requirements to be incorporated into new infrastructure. 
The City's EDS, revised in 2025, governs the design of future water infrastructure in the City. The IWMP 
does not replace engineering design in compliance with the City's EDS and code requirements. 
The water performance criteria that are applied in the IWMP are described below. 
4.3.1 
Demand Peaking Factors 
Peaking factors (PF) are established to calculate the MDD and peak hour demands (PHDs) from average 
daily demands. PF are as follows: 
 
MDD equals 1.8 multiplied by average day demands (ADD). 
 
PHD equals 3.0 multiplied by ADD. 
4.3.2 
Wells 
The firm well capacity serving an area is calculated assuming that each well operates no more than 
18 hours per day. In addition, each service area needs to have 15 percent redundant well capacity with a 
minimum of one redundant well. 
4.3.3 
Pump Stations 
Each pump station provides water for (a) PHD or (b) MDD plus fire flow, whichever is larger, with the 
largest pump in the station out of service. When multiple pump stations serve a pressure zone, the 
demand needs to be satisfied with the largest pump in each station out of service.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-8 
4.3.4 
Water Storage 
The required water storage for one or more pressure zones is the maximum of the following four criteria: 
1. Peak Hour Storage – Four hours of PHD without using more than 80 percent of the total storage 
capacity without wells. 
2. Fire Flow – 25 percent of the MDD plus the highest required fire storage in the pressure zone. 
3. Operating Storage – 20 percent of the MDD. 
4. Emergency Storage – ADD without using more than 80 percent of the total storage capacity without 
wells. 
Criteria No. 4 – Emergency storage is the controlling criteria for sizing storage tanks for the range of flows 
in Buckeye and will be used in storage capacity evaluations. 
The recommended minimum acceptable new storage tank size in the City is 1 million gallons (MG) for 
land areas that are planned to develop and ultimately require more storage. 
4.3.5 
Transmission/Distribution Mains 
Transmission and distribution main minimum sizes must meet the following criteria: 
 
The minimum pipe size for water mains is 8 inches. 
 
The minimum pipe size for water mains in half-mile streets and collector streets is 12 inches. 
 
The minimum pipe size for water main in mile streets and arterial streets is 16 inches. 
 
In no case will there be less than one 16-inch main connecting to each adjacent booster station or 
adjacent development. The 16-inch main connection will be coordinated with the adjacent booster 
service area. 
The water velocity criteria in water mains are as follows: 
 
Velocity less than or equal to 5 feet per second (fps) for average day, maximum day, and peak hour 
flows. 
 
Velocity less than or equal to 10 fps for maximum day plus fire flow.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-9 
4.3.6 
Pressures 
The City's service area covers a large elevation range. To provide consistent pressure throughout the 
service area, the City has defined pressure zone boundaries based on elevation, summarized in Table 4.1. 
Table 4.1 
City of Buckeye Pressure Zone Boundary Elevations 
Pressure Zone 
Low Elevation (feet) 
High Elevation (feet) 
1 
820 
950 
2 
950 
1,080 
3 
1,080 
1,210 
4 
1,210 
1,340 
5 
1,340 
1,470 
6 
1,470 
1,600 
7 
1,600 
1,730 
8 
1,730 
1,860 
9 
1,860 
1,990 
10 
1,990 
2,120 
The City requires that the distribution system satisfy the following criteria: 
 
50 pounds per square inch (psi) shall be maintained during average, maximum day, and peak hour 
conditions. 
 
20 psi shall be maintained during max day plus fire flow conditions. 
 
The maximum pressure in the distribution system shall not exceed 110 psi. 
 
The 2025 City of Buckeye design standards require a service line pressure reducing valve (PRV) on all 
residential lots.  
4.3.7 
Fire Flows 
The City's fire flow criteria are based on the type of development as summarized below: 
 
Low and medium density (less than 8 DU/ac) – 1,500 gpm for 2 hours. 
 
Active adult (maximum 8 units per acre) – 1,500 gpm for 2 hours. 
 
High density (more than 8 units per acre, including apartments) – 2,000 gpm for 4 hours. 
 
Commercial/mixed use – 3,000 gpm for 4 hours. 
 
Schools – 3,000 gpm for 4 hours. 
 
Malls/retail areas – 4,000 gpm for 4 hours. 
 
Industrial/warehouse – 5,000 gpm for 4 hours. 
 
Commercial high rise/multi-story – 5,000 gpm for 4 hours. 
The maximum velocity in distribution mains is 10 fps for the maximum day plus fire flow scenarios.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-10 
4.3.8 
Performance Criteria Summary 
Table 4.2 summarizes the performance criteria used to evaluate the delivery system. 
Table 4.2 
Performance Criteria Summary 
Description 
Criteria 
Demand and Production Criteria 
Peaking Factors 
 
MDD/ADD 
1.8 
PHD/ADD 
3.0 
Water Production 
Supply MDD while wells operate a maximum of 18 hours per 
day and with 15% redundancy 
Storage Criteria 
Emergency Storage – ADD without using more than 80% of 
the total storage capacity without wells 
Transmission/Distribution 
Velocity Criteria 
 
ADD, MDD, and PHD 
≤ 5 fps 
MDD plus Fire Flow 
≤ 10 fps 
Pressure Criteria (ADD, MDD, PHD) 
50 psi ≤ Pressure ≤ 110 psi 
Pressure Criteria (Fire Flow) 
20 psi ≤ Pressure ≤ 110 psi 
Pipe Diameter Criteria (inches) 
 
Section Lines/Arterial 
16 
Half-Mile/Collector Pipelines 
12 
All Other Pipelines 
8 
Booster Pump Station (BPS) Criteria 
Capacity Requirement 
The larger of PHD or MDD plus Fire Flow 
Firm Capacity 
Capacity with the largest pump out of service 
Fire Flow Criteria 
Fire Flow Requirements(1) 
 Low-Density Residential = 1,500 gpm for 2 hours 
 High-Density Residential = 2,000 gpm for 4 hours 
 Commercial/Mixed Use/ Schools = 3,000 gpm for 4 hours 
 Industrial/Warehouse = 5,000 gpm for 4 hours 
Notes: 
(1) Fire flow requirements are general and applied for planning purposes. The 2018 edition of the International Fire Code allows 
reductions in fire flow requirements for structures with approved automatic sprinkler systems and installation practices, 
which can be granted at the discretion of the City Fire Marshall. 
4.4 
Hydraulic Model 
The City previously had a water distribution system model of the Central Buckeye area developed in the 
InfoWater Pro modeling software by Innovyze. This model was expanded to include the Tartesso and Sun 
City Festival area by taking the City's GIS data, facilities information, and customer billing data to create 
the ability to model those areas. The City prefers the WaterCAD modeling software by Bentley so the 
models were converted to WaterCAD for use in the IWMP. The models were used to size future water 
mains and evaluate pipe capacity under PHDs and fire flow conditions.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-11 
4.5 
Master Plan by Water Service Area 
The Buckeye water distribution system has four hydraulically separate water service areas located within 
one or more pressure zones. In this section, a separate plan is provided for each service area. 
4.5.1 
Sun City Festival 
The Sun City Festival development in WPA 1 is located just south of the CAP canal and straddles Zone 6 
and 7. This water system was constructed to serve the Sun City Festival development and is not intended 
to serve adjacent developments. The Sun City Festival development is approximately half developed. Sun 
City Festival does have land north of the CAP canal, but currently, there is not a water resource allocation 
or defined plan to develop north of the canal. 
The Sun City Festival service area, water distribution system, water production facilities, and water storage 
tanks are shown in Figure 4.2. 
4.5.1.1 
2024 Water Infrastructure Description 
Wells and Water Treatment 
Sun City Festival has three active wells; a fourth well location has been drilled but is not equipped. The 
Sun City Festival wells are summarized in Table 4.3. These wells give Sun City Festival a total water supply 
capacity of 5,360 gpm, with a firm capacity of 3,310 gpm when the largest well, Festival Number No. 1, is 
offline. 
Table 4.3 
Sun City Festival Wells 
Well 
Permitted Volume (AFY) 
Pumping Flow Rate (gpm) 
Festival No. 1 
2,581 
2,050 
Festival No. 2 
1,665 
1,990 
Festival No. 3 
1,665 
1,320 
Festival No. 4 
TBD 
Drilled but not constructed. 
TBD - to be determined 
Pump Stations 
The Sun City Festival water distribution system has one BPS that serves two pressure zones (Pressure 
Zones 6 and 7). The pump station has three pumps and a firm pumping capacity of 3,600 gpm. A fourth 
pump will be installed in 2025 and will add an additional 1,900 gpm of capacity. The pump station is 
located at the southeast corner of the Beardsley Parkway and Desert Vista Boulevard intersection.

N 291st Ave
A
v
e
Sun Valley Pkw
y
W
Yukon D
r
N
27
3rd Ave
N De
se
rt Oa
sis Blvd
W Beardsley Pkwy
W Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
S
un Valley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
N 251st Ave
W Rose Garden Ln
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
Dr
W M
cRae D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W Beardsley Pkwy
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
Zone 7
Zone 6
Sun City
Festival
Well #2
Sun City
Festival
Well #1
Sun City
Festival
Well #3
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
0.35
0.17
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 4.2  Sun City Festival 2024 Water Distribution System
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
!ã
Well
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
16
20
24
Pressure Zones
6
7

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-13 
Water Storage 
Sun City Festival has 2 groundwater storage tanks (GSTs) located at the Sun City Festival pump station 
site. Each storage tank has a rated capacity of 1.0 MG, for a total capacity of 2.0 MG. 
Water Distribution Mains 
The Sun City Festival distribution system consists of 70.7 miles of water mains. Table 4.4 summarizes the 
length of water mains by diameter. 
Table 4.4 
Sun City Festival Water Mains 
Main Diameter (inches) 
Total Length (miles) 
6 and Smaller 
0.3 
8 
49.9 
12 
14.3 
16 
5.2 
20 
0.9 
24 
0.1 
Total 
70.7 
4.5.1.2 
Planned Development Areas 
Figure 4.3 shows the planned development areas in Sun City Festival. In Figure 4.3, lands to be developed 
are colored based on the development planning period. The development planning period is dictated by 
the first phase in which an area will have in-service developments and does not mean that area will be 
completely developed by that year. 
4.5.1.3 
Demand Projections 
The Sun City Festival water distribution system was evaluated using the ADD, MDD, and PHD conditions in 
each planning period. The demands for each planning period are summarized in Table 4.5. These demand 
projections include areas that can be developed by 2040 and have a CAWS or land use type that does not 
require a CAWS (commercial and industrial). 
Table 4.5 
Sun City Festival Demand Projections 
Planning Year 
Average Daily Water Demand (gpm) MDD (gpm) 
PHD (gpm) 
2024 
820 
1,476 
2,460 
2030 
999 
1,798 
2,997 
2035 
1,084 
1,951 
3,252 
2040 
1,221 
2,198 
3,663

N 291st Ave
A
v
e
Sun Valley Pkw
y
W
Yukon D
r
Deser
t O
as
is B
lvd
W Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
N 251st Ave
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
Dr
W M
cRae D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
Festival
Ranch
Festival
Ranch
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
North Star
Ranch
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
0.3
0.15
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.3  Sun City Festival Development Areas
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
3
Q
Water Campus or WTP
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
16
20
24
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Master Planned
Community
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-15 
4.5.1.4 
Sun City Festival Capacity Evaluation 
Water Supply Evaluation 
Table 4.6 presents the results of a water supply capacity evaluation for each planning period based on the 
City's performance criteria for MDD conditions. 
Table 4.6 
Sun City Festival Water Supply Evaluation 
Well/Plant 
Flow Rate  
(gpm) 
Planning Year Maximum Day Supply/Demand (gpm) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Festival No. 1(1) 
2,050 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Festival No. 2 
1,990 
1,990 
1,990 
1,990 
1,990 
Festival No. 3 
1,320 
1,320 
1,320 
1,320 
1,320 
Festival No. 4(2) 
1,000 
0 
1,000 
1,000 
1,000 
Firm Supply(3) 
6,360 
2,110 
2,748 
2,748 
2,748 
MDD 
– 
1,476 
1,798 
1,951 
2,198 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
– 
634 
949 
796 
550 
Notes: 
(1) Festival No. 1 is assumed to be offline for redundancy. 
(2) Festival No. 4 has been drilled and equipping is budgeted for 2025. 
(3) Firm supply assumes wells operate 75% of the time with 15% redundancy, per COB EDS 3-5.301. 
Table 4.6 shows that the existing Sun City Festival wells are projected to meet requirements for MDD 
through 2040. Festival Well No. 4 helps to improve supply resiliency, offset future reduced flows from the 
other wells, and supply demands that are higher than anticipated. 
The City has a CAP allocation, an NIA allocation, and is pursuing water supplies that could be delivered via 
the CAP canal, including Harquahala water and a water right from raising the Bartlett Dam. By 2040, an 
SWTP could be constructed near the CAP canal. Water delivered by this SWTP could provide additional 
reliability to the Sun City Festival water system and reduce the reliance on groundwater, as well as provide 
water supplies to developments located farther south along Sun Valley Parkway. The City should make 
arrangements for land where this SWTP could be located, possibly creating a water campus near the 
WWTP. Land to be acquired depends on the ultimate size of the WTP. Most treatment plants in Maricopa 
County in the small to midsize range are on parcels between 15 and 40 acres. 
Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
Table 4.7 presents an evaluation of the required pump station infrastructure for each planning period 
using the City's performance criteria listed in Table 4.2. With a school and several community centers, a 
fire flow requirement of 3,000 gpm in addition to MDD was used in the evaluation. The evaluation shows 
that pumps would operate beyond the firm capacity in the event of a fire flow. A fourth pump, providing 
an additional 1,900 gpm of capacity, is planned to be installed by the end of 2025. With the new pump, 
the pump station will have enough capacity to meet the pumping requirements for the projected 2040 
Sun City Festival demands.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-16 
Table 4.7 
Sun City Festival Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
Booster Pump Station 
Number of 
Pumps 
Capacity (gpm) or Demand (gpm) 
Firm 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Sun City Festival 
3 
3,600 
3,600 
3,600 
3,600 
3,600 
Sun City Festival Pump Expansion 
1 
1,900 
0 
1,900 
1,900 
1,900 
Firm Pump Station Capacity 
 
5,500 
3,600 
5,500 
5,500 
5,500 
Required Pump Flow Rate(1)(2) 
 
 
4,476 
4,798 
4,951 
5,198 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
 
 
-876 
702 
549 
302 
Notes: 
(1) School fire flow requirement (3,000 gpm) is used for evaluation. 
(2) Required capacity calculated as the larger of (a) PHD or (b) MDD plus fire flow requirement. 
Storage Capacity Evaluation 
Table 4.8 presents an evaluation of the required water storage infrastructure in Sun City Festival for each 
planning period. The required storage is dictated by the City's performance criteria, summarized in 
Table 4.2. 
Table 4.8 
Sun City Festival Storage Capacity Evaluation 
Tank 
Rated Capacity 
(MG) 
Available Capacity (MG) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Festival Tank 1 
1.25 
1.25 
1.25 
1.25 
1.25 
Festival Tank 2 
1.1 
1.1 
1.1 
1.1 
1.1 
Total Volume 
2.35 
2.35 
2.35 
2.35 
2.35 
Required Volume(1) 
 
1.48 
1.80 
1.95 
2.20 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
 
0.87 
0.55 
0.40 
0.15 
Notes: 
(1) Required capacity is calculated to be one day of ADD without using more than 80% of the total storage capacity without 
using wells. 
A second Festival storage tank was recently constructed, giving a total storage capacity of 2.35 MG. 
Table 4.8 shows that 2.35 MG of storage will be sufficient to meet storage requirements for the projected 
2040 Sun City Festival demands. Beyond 2040, the City should plan to expand storage further to meet 
buildout storage requirements.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-17 
Water Distribution System Evaluation 
The City's WaterCAD model was used to evaluate the capacity of the water distribution system. The PHD 
scenario was used to evaluate the Sun City Festival water distribution system against the City's 
performance criteria stated in Table 4.2. The model predicted that water system pressures were between 
50 and 110 psi, and water velocities were below 5 fps, so the performance criteria is satisfied. 
Appendix 2A, Figure 4A.1, presents a map documenting the predicted model pressures. A fire flow model 
simulation was also completed under MDD plus fire flow conditions, and the residual pressure is above 
20 psi throughout the distribution system. However, the pumping capacity in Sun City Festival is not 
sufficient to meet the MDD plus 3,000 gpm fire flow required at commercial and school developments. 
Therefore, it is recommended that the City expand the existing pump station to meet fire flow 
requirements. 
4.5.1.5 
Infrastructure Projects 
The recommended infrastructure projects for Sun City Festival include the new well, storage tank, and 
pump station expansion to address projected capacity limitations. Additionally, transmission mains to 
serve future development within Sun City Festival and groundwater treatment for the future well are 
included. The recommended infrastructure projects are shown in Figure 4.4 and summarized in Table 4.9. 
The Trigger column in Table 4.9 identifies when a project needs to be in service. Projects to address 
known deficiencies are assigned the 2030 planning year so that the projects are completed in the next 
5 years. Other projects need to be constructed in time to make sure that the performance criteria can be 
met. For example, the MDD will increase with new growth, so the timing of new wells needs to align with 
the requirement to supply MDDs. Some projects will be constructed when growth occurs in a 
geographical area. For example, a transmission main project serving a completely new development will 
need to be in place when that development is being constructed. For these projects, the trigger is the 
timing of a development, and the planning year of anticipated development is also provided to give the 
approximate time period. As conditions change, the City will be able to make near-term adjustments to 
the time a project should start so that the project can be completed on time.

N 291st Ave
A
v
e
Sun Valley Pkw
y
W
Yukon D
r
Deser
t O
as
is B
lvd
W Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
N 251st Ave
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
Dr
W M
cRae D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
3
Q
3
Q
W6
W8
W8
W8
W8
W8
W5
W8
W6
W63
W7
W7
W3.2
Sun City
Festival
Well #2
Sun City
Festival
Well #1
Sun City
Festival
Well #3
W1
W3
W2
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
0.3
0.15
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.4  Sun City Festival Recommended Water Distribution Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
3
Q
Proposed WTP
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
U
T"
=)
Proposed Booster Pump
Station
!ã
Well
!ã
Proposed Well
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
16
20
24
Proposed Water Main (inches)
12
16
24
Proposed Raw Water
Main
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Master Planned
Community
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-19 
Table 4.9 
Sun City Festival Planned Infrastructure Projects 
Project ID 
Facility Type 
Description 
Justification 
Capacity/Size 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Project Trigger  
(Year) 
W3.1 
SWTP 
SWTP including storage 
and pumping onsite 
Treat surface water allocation for 
potable use for developments along 
Sun Valley Parkway. 
TBD depending 
on acquired 
surface water 
1 
After water resource and supply 
established, expected near 
2040. 
W3.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Pipeline from CAP Canal 
to treatment plant 
Treat surface water allocation for 
potable use for developments along 
Sun Valley Parkway. 
24 inches, may be 
larger depending 
on acquired 
surface water 
3,200 
After water resource and supply 
established. 
W3.3 
Land Acquisition for 
SWTP 
Land for a SWTP 
Treat surface water allocation for 
potable use for developments along 
Sun Valley Parkway. 
15 to 40 acres 
1 
By 2030, before land is 
committed to other purposes. 
W5 
Potable Water Mains Transmission mains 
within Sun City Festival 
Convey water to projected future 
development. 
12 inches 
2,900 
Development in the Area 
(2030). 
W6 
Potable Water Mains Transmission mains 
within Sun City Festival 
Convey water to projected future 
development. 
16 inches 
4,400 
Development in the Area 
(2030). 
W7 
Potable Water Mains Transmission mains 
within Sun City Festival 
Convey water to projected future 
development. 
12 inches 
6,700 
Development in the Area 
(2035). 
W8 
Potable Water Mains Transmission mains 
within Sun City Festival 
Convey water to projected future 
development. 
24 inches 
24,700 
Development in the Area 
(2035). 
ID - identification; Qty - quantity

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-20 
4.5.2 
Floreo at Teravalis 
Floreo at Teravalis (referred to in this report as Floreo) is a Master Planned community designed by a 
developer. The water system has been constructed and currently serves model homes. The portion of 
Floreo located east of Wagner Wash is the portion that is being considered in the IWMP. Floreo will be 
supplied by wells, and in the future, the water supply could come through a transmission main supplied 
by a future WTF that takes water from the CAP canal to the north. A much larger Teravalis development 
will be located west of the Hassayampa River channel, but this portion of the development does not yet 
have a water resource allocation and is not included in this IWMP. 
4.5.2.1 
Planned Development Areas 
Figure 4.5 shows the planned development areas in Floreo. In Figure 4.5, lands to be developed are 
colored based on the development planning period. The actual development timing and location may 
vary. 
4.5.2.2 
Demand Projections 
The Floreo water distribution system was planned and analyzed based on the projected future ADD, MDD, 
and PHD conditions for each planning period. The demands for each planning period are summarized in 
Table 4.10. These demand projections include areas that can be developed by 2040 with a CAWS or areas 
with a land use type that does not require a CAWS (commercial and industrial). 
Table 4.10 
Floreo Demand Projections 
Planning Year 
Average Daily Water Demand 
(gpm) 
MDD  
(gpm) 
PHD  
(gpm) 
2024 
- 
- 
- 
2030 
772 
1,390 
2,317 
2035 
888 
1,598 
2,663 
2040 
1,252 
2,254 
3,757

W
C
act
u
s
Rd
W
C
a
c
t
u
s
Rd
N
3
0
4
t
h
L
n
W
Indig
o
Way
S
W Teravalis Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
Floreo
Teravalis
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
0.3
0.15
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.5  Floreo Development Areas
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Projected Development Phase
2030
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-22 
4.5.2.3 
Water System Capacity Evaluation 
Water Supply Evaluation 
Table 4.11 presents an evaluation of the required well production in Floreo for each planning period. The 
required water supply is dictated by the City's performance criteria. 
Table 4.11 
Floreo Water Supply Evaluation 
Well/Plant 
Estimated Well Production  
(gpm) 
Planning Period MDD (gpm) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Floreo Well No. 1 
1,400 
0 
1400 
1400 
1400 
Floreo Well No. 2 
905 
0 
905 
905 
905 
Floreo Well No. 3 
490 
0 
490 
490 
490 
Floreo Well No. 4 
1,800 
0 
0 
1800 
1800 
Floreo Well No. 5 
800 
0 
0 
0 
800 
Floreo Well No. 6 
800 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Floreo Well No. 7 
800 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Firm Supply(1) 
4,040 
- 
2,096 
3,446 
4,046 
MDD 
– 
- 
1,390 
1,598 
2,254 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
– 
0 
706 
1,848 
1,792 
Notes: 
(1) Firm supply assumes wells operate 75% of the time with 15% redundancy, per COB EDS 3-5.301. 
Table 4.11 shows that three wells will be required by 2030 to meet demands with a fourth well required 
for redundancy. Two additional wells are required by 2040. Well production in Floreo is unknown, so 
800 gpm per well is assumed. The number of wells needed to serve Floreo will depend on the actual 
production of each well. 
Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
Table 4.12 presents an evaluation of the required pump station infrastructure in Floreo for each planning 
period. The required pumping capacity is dictated by the performance criteria summarized in Table 4.2. 
Commercial or institutional development is estimated to be constructed by 2035, increasing the fire flow 
pumping requirements in 2035 and beyond. Actual pumping requirements will be refined as each phase 
of the project develops. 
Table 4.12 
Floreo Water Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
Booster Pump Station 
Number of 
Pumps 
Capacity (gpm) or Demand (gpm) 
Firm 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Floreo BPS (Zone 5) 
6 
5,750 
0 
5,750 
5,750 
5,750 
Floreo BPS (Zone 4) 
6 
5,000 
0 
0 
5,000 
5,000 
Total Capacity 
 
10,750 
- 
5,750 
10,750 
10,750 
Required Pump Flow Rate(1)(2) 
 
 
- 
2,890 
4,598 
5,254 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
 
 
0 
2,860 
6,152 
5,496 
Notes: 
(1) Low-density residential fire flow requirement (1,500 gpm) is used for 2030. Commercial fire flow requirement (3,000 gpm) is 
used for 2035 and 2040. 
(2) Required flow rate is calculated as the larger of (a) PHD or (b) MDD plus fire flow requirement.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-23 
The City has design plans for the Floreo Water Campus that include sets of pumps for serving Pressure 
Zones 5 and 4. Phase 1 of the water campus will include the Zone 5 pumps (six pumps with a firm capacity 
of 5,750 gpm). Phase 2 of the water campus will include the Zone 4 pumps (six pumps with a firm capacity 
of 5,000 gpm). The design plans show that both pump sets have room for additional pumps to be added 
in the future, if necessary. 
Storage Capacity Evaluation 
Table 4.13 presents an evaluation of the required water storage volume for each planning period. The 
required storage is defined by the City's performance criteria in Table 4.2. 
Table 4.13 
Floreo Water Storage Evaluation 
Tank 
Rated Capacity 
(MG) 
Available Capacity (MG) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Floreo Tank 1 
3.2 
0.0 
3.2 
3.2 
3.2 
Total Volume 
3.2 
- 
3.2 
3.2 
3.2 
Required Volume(1) 
 
- 
1.4 
1.6 
2.3 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
 
0.0 
1.8 
1.6 
0.9 
Notes: 
(1) Required capacity is one day of ADD without using more than 80% of the total storage capacity without using wells. 
A 3.2-MG GST has already been constructed for Floreo. Table 4.13 shows that this tank will be sufficient to 
meet storage requirements through 2040. This tank is planned to be located at the storage and booster 
station on the west side of the initial Floreo development, near what will become Teravalis Parkway and 
Johnson Road. A second finished water storage tank is planned for the site. 
4.5.2.4 
Infrastructure Projects 
The planned infrastructure projects for Floreo include new wells, water treatment, storage tank, and pump 
station. Infrastructure projects include transmission mains to serve future subdivisions within Floreo. The 
recommended infrastructure projects are summarized in Figure 4.6 and Table 4.14. 
The Trigger column in Table 4.14 identifies when a project needs to be in service. Some projects need to 
be constructed in time to make sure that the performance criteria can be met. For example, the MDD will 
increase with new growth, so the timing of new wells needs to align with the requirement to supply 
MDDs. Other projects will be constructed when growth occurs in a geographical area. For example, a 
transmission main project serving a completely new development will need to be in place when that 
development is being constructed. For these projects, the trigger is the timing of a development, and the 
planning year of anticipated development is also provided to give the approximate time. As conditions 
change, the City will be able to make near-term adjustments to the time a project should start so that the 
project can be completed on time.

W
C
act
u
s
Rd
W
C
a
c
t
u
s
Rd
N
3
0
4
t
h
L
n
W
Indig
o
Way
S
W Teravalis Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)3
Q
W17
W64
W64
W17
W63
W16
W16
W16
W17
W58
W58
W58
W17
W17
W59
W59
W63
W63
W59
W59
W59
W14.2
W11.2
W10.2
W21.2
W13.2
W9.2
W9.1
W10.1
W11.1
W12.1
W13.1
W14.1
W21.1
W15
W14
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
0.3
0.15
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.6  Floreo Recommended Water Distribution Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
3
Q
Proposed WTP
U
T"
=)
Proposed Booster Pump
Station
!ã
Proposed Well
Proposed Water Main (inches)
12
16
24
Proposed Raw Water
Main
Projected Development Phase
2030
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-25 
Table 4.14 
Floreo Recommended Infrastructure Projects 
Project ID 
Facility Type 
Description 
Justification 
Capacity/Size 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Project Trigger  
(Year) 
W9.1 
Well 
Floreo Well No. 1 
Supply water demands for projected future customers. 
800 gpm 
1 
Before first home is constructed. 
W10.1 
Well 
Floreo Well No. 2 
Supply water demands for projected future customers. 
800 gpm 
1 
Before first home is constructed. 
W11.1 
Well 
Floreo Well No. 3 
Supply water demands for projected future customers. 
800 gpm 
1 
2030 
W12.1 
Well 
Floreo Well No. 4 
Supply water demands for projected future customers. 
800 gpm 
1 
2030 
W13.1 
Well  
Floreo Well No. 5 
Supply water demands for projected future customers. 
800 gpm 
1 
MDD approaches capacity of 4 wells.(1) 
W14.1 
Well 
Floreo Well No. 6 
Supply water demands for projected future customers. 
800 gpm 
1 
MDD approaches capacity of 5 wells.(1) 
W21.1 
Well 
Floreo Well No. 7 
Supply water demands for projected future customers. 
800 gpm 
1 
MDD approaches capacity of 6 wells.(1) 
W9.2 
Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Convey water from Floreo Well No. 1 to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
6,200 
Concurrent with Well No. 1. 
W10.2 
Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline  
Convey water from Floreo Well No. 2 to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
2,400 
Concurrent with Well No. 2. 
W11.2 
Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline  
Convey water from Floreo Well No. 3 to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
1,000 
Concurrent with Well No. 3. 
W12.2 
Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline  
Convey water from Floreo Well No. 4 to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
250 
Concurrent with Well No. 4. 
W13.2 
Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Convey water from Floreo Well No. 5 to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
5,600 
Concurrent with Well No. 5. 
W14.2 
Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Convey water from Floreo Well No. 5 to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
500 
Concurrent with Well No. 6. 
W21.2 
Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Convey water from Floreo Well No. 5 to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
3,100 
Concurrent with Well No. 7. 
W14 
Groundwater Treatment 
Arsenic Treatment Facility 
Treat groundwater from wells. 
8.5 mgd 
1 
Concurrent with Well No. 1. 
W15.1 
Ground Storage 
Storage Tank 
Provide water storage. 
3.2 MG 
1 
Concurrent with Well No. 1. 
W15.2 
Pump Station 
Pump Station 
Meet pumping capacity requirements for projected future developments. 
8.5 mgd 
1 
Concurrent with Well No. 1. 
W16 
Potable Water Mains 
Transmission Mains within Floreo 
Convey water to projected future developments. 
16 inches 
12,250 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W17 
Potable Water Mains 
Transmission Mains within Floreo 
Convey water to projected future developments. 
12 inches 
20,400 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W58 
Potable Water Mains 
Transmission Mains within Floreo 
Convey water to projected future developments. 
16 inches 
13,400 
Development in the Area (2040). 
W59 
Potable Water Mains 
Transmission Mains within Floreo 
Convey water to projected future developments. 
12 inches 
19,750 
Development in the Area (2040). 
W63 
Water Transmission Main 
Transmission Main from the CAP 
SWTP to Floreo 
Convey surface water to the Floreo development. 
24 inches 
21,700 
Concurrent with the CAP SWTP. 
Notes: 
(1) The timing of well projects is dependent on the flow rate performance of any new constructed wells and assumes that all existing well flow rates remain constant.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-26 
4.5.3 
Tartesso 
The Tartesso development is located on the west side of Buckeye, north of I-10. Tartesso is a stand-alone 
development with multiple planned developments located to the north and west. Most of the existing 
development in Tartesso area is in Pressure Zone 3. However, the northeastern part of Tartesso falls within 
the elevation range of Pressure Zone 4. The area that falls within Pressure Zone 4 is relatively small, and 
the system is not isolated along the pressure zone boundary. 
South of Tartesso is a "horse property" type development named West Phoenix Estates. The Tartesso and 
West Phoenix Estates distribution systems could be connected to improve system resiliency, however, the 
City has indicated that this is unlikely to happen in the foreseeable future. 
The Tartesso water distribution system, water production facilities, and water storage tanks are shown in 
Figure 4.7. 
4.5.3.1 
2024 Water Infrastructure Description 
Wells and Water Treatment 
Tartesso has three active wells, listed in Table 4.15. Water from the wells is conveyed to the Tartesso water 
campus where it is treated and then stored before being pumped into the water distribution system. Wells 
Tartesso No. 1, 2, and 3 serve the Tartesso development area and Sun Valley No. 1 and 2 serve the West 
Phoenix Estates development area. Since these developments are planned to be kept separate, the Sun 
Valley wells are not included in the water supply capacity analysis later in this section.  
Table 4.15 
Tartesso Wells 
Well 
Permitted Capacity (AFY) 
Pumping Flow Rate (gpm) 
Tartesso No. 1 
1,235 
400 
Tartesso No. 2 
600 
1,250 
Tartesso No. 3 
1,573 
1,350 
Sun Valley No. 1(1) 
n/a 
250 
Sun Valley No. 2(1) 
n/a 
175 
Notes: 
(1) The Sun Valley Well is run by generator power.

choo
l
R
d
W Indian School Rd
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
Earll Dr
N 311th Ave
315th Ave
W Osborn Rd
Flower St
Catalina Dr
Thomas
Rd
N Johnson Rd
10
311t
h A
v
e
N 311th Ave
W T
a
rt
ess
o
Pk
wy
N
L
ainey L
n
N B
roo
kl
y
n D
r
N B
ro
oklyn
Dr
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
W Thomas Rd
W Thomas Rd
Bruner Rd
N
30
3rd
A
v
e
Ta
rt
e
ss
o
P
k
wy
Ta
rte
sso Pkwy
N Johnson Rd
Sun Valley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
W Van Buren St
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
N 293rd Ave
N 295th Ave
W Bellview St
W Pierce St
W Pierce St
W
McDowel
l
Rd
W McDowell Rd
Taylor St
W Roosevelt St
W Roosevelt St
308th Ave
W Latham St
N 29
9th Ave
N 299th Ave
McKinley St
W
Melvin St
W Taylor St
303rd Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
W Indian School Rd
ne Rd
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
W McDowell Rd
Wilson Ave
W Van
Bur
en St
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Sun Valley
Well #2
Sun Valley
Well #1
Tartesso
Well #1
Tartesso
Well #2
Tartesso
Well #3
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
0.5
0.25
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.7 Tartesso 2024 Water Distribution System
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
16
20
24
Pressure Zones
2
3
4
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / F
L
I
i
NAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-28 
Pump Stations 
The Tartesso water distribution system has one BPS. The pump station is located at the corner of Amelia 
Avenue and 296th Avenue, along with the Tartesso storage tank. The pump station has five pumps and a 
firm pumping capacity of 6,000 gpm. 
Water Storage 
Tartesso has 1 GST. The tank is located at the Tartesso water campus (Amelia Avenue and 296th Avenue), 
with a rated storage capacity of 2.0 MG. There is not enough space at the site for additional storage, 
although the site might be expanded to the north. 
Water Distribution Mains 
The Tartesso distribution system has 44.9 miles of water mains. Table 4.16 summarizes the length of water 
mains by diameter. 
Table 4.16 
Tartesso Water Mains 
Diameter (inches) 
Total Length (miles) 
6 
0.3 
8 
30.0 
12 
2.9 
16 
5.3 
20 
1.9 
24 
1.0 
36 
3.7 
Total 
45.1 
4.5.3.2 
Planned Development Areas 
Figure 4.8 shows the planned development areas in Tartesso. In Figure 4.8, lands to be developed are 
colored based on the development planning period. The development planning period is dictated by the 
first phase in which an area will have in-service developments and does not mean that area will be 
completely developed by that year. There have been discussions on the possibility of connecting the West 
Phoenix Estates distribution system to the Tartesso system, however, the City indicated that several 
challenges need to be overcome to do so. For this report, it is assumed that the Tartesso and West 
Phoenix Estates distribution systems will remain separate.

Sun
10
10
Sun Valley Pkwy
Sky
Region
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
Tartesso
Tartesso
Tartesso
Tartesso
Tartesso West
Tartesso West
Tartesso West
Elianto
Elianto
Montiere
Sun Valley
South
Desert Creek
Desert Creek
Valle Del Sol
Valle Del Rio
Cipriani
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
0.5
0.25
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.8  Tartesso Development Areas
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
16
20
24
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community
111th Ave
Thomas Rd
Indian School Rd
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-30 
4.5.3.3 
Demand Projections 
The Tartesso water distribution system was analyzed under ADD, MDD, and PHD conditions. The demands 
for each planning period are summarized in Table 4.17. These demand projections include areas that can 
be developed by 2040 based on their CAWS status or areas with a land use type that does not require a 
CAWS (commercial and industrial). 
Table 4.17 
Tartesso Demand Projections 
Planning Year 
Average Daily Water Demand 
(gpm) 
MDD  
(gpm) 
PHD  
(gpm) 
2024 
995 
1,791  
2,985  
2030 
1,197 
2,155  
3,592  
2035 
1,542 
2,775  
4,625  
2040 
1,886 
3,395  
5,658  
4.5.3.4 
Water System Capacity Evaluation 
Water Supply Evaluation 
Table 4.18 contains an evaluation of the required water supply infrastructure in Tartesso for each planning 
period. The required supply is defined by the City's performance criteria in Table 4.2. 
Table 4.18 
Tartesso Water Supply Evaluation 
Well 
Total Capacity  
(gpm) 
Planning Year MDD (gpm) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Tartesso No. 1 
400 
400 
400 
400 
400 
Tartesso No. 2 
1,250 
1,250 
1,250 
1,250 
1,250 
Tartesso No. 3(1) 
1,350 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Tartesso No. 4 
1,200 
0 
1,200 
1,200 
1,200 
Tartesso No. 5 
1,200 
0 
1,200 
1,200 
1,200 
Tartesso No. 6 
1,200 
0 
0 
0 
1,200 
Firm Supply(3) 
6,600 
1,238 
3,038 
3,038 
3,938 
MDD(2) 
– 
1,791 
2,155 
2,775 
3,395 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
– 
-554 
882 
263 
543 
Notes: 
(1) Tartesso No. 3 assumed to be off for redundancy. 
(2) Developments included in the demand projection are: Tartesso, Elianto Village 1, Elianto Village 4, and Mirielle Phase 1A. 
(3) Firm supply assumes wells operate 75% of the time with 15% redundancy, per COB EDS 3-5.301. 
Table 4.18 shows that the three existing wells in Tartesso are not sufficient to meet the current 2024 
supply requirements when Tartesso Well No. 3 is offline for redundancy. Therefore, a new well Tartesso 
No. 4 is recommended for immediate construction to provide adequate capacity. Two additional wells, 
Tartesso No. 5 and No. 6, are recommended to provide sufficient capacity by 2035 and 2040.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-31 
Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
Table 4.19 presents an evaluation of the pump station infrastructure in Tartesso for each planning phase. 
The required pumping capacity in each phase is dictated by the City's performance criteria. Commercial 
areas are expected to develop in future phases along Sun Valley Parkway. In 2024, a low-density 
residential fire flow requirement (1,500 gpm) was used; however, a commercial fire flow requirement 
(3,000 gpm) was used for all future planning periods. 
Table 4.19 
Tartesso Water Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
Booster Pump Station 
Number of 
Pumps 
Capacity (gpm) or Demand (gpm) 
Firm 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Tartesso BPS 
5 
6,000 
6,000 
6,000 
6,000 
6,000 
Bruner and Camelback BPS 
5 
3,000 
0 
3,000 
3,000 
3,000 
Total Capacity 
 
9,000 
6,000 
8,750  
10,750  
10,750  
Required Capacity(1)(2) 
 
 
3,291 
2,890  
4,598  
5,254  
Surplus/(Deficit) 
 
 
2,709 
5,860 
6,152 
5,496 
Notes: 
(1) Low-density residential fire flow requirement (1,500 gpm) used for evaluation in 2024. Commercial fire flow requirement 
(3,000 gpm) used for future phases. 
(2) Required capacity calculated as the larger of (a) PHD or (b) MDD plus fire flow requirement. 
Table 4.19 shows that the existing Tartesso BPS does not have sufficient capacity to meet pumping 
capacity requirements through 2040 on its own. If the City can acquire additional land adjacent to the 
Tartesso site to expand this facility then flow from additional wells could be delivered to this site and 
make a larger, regional facility. If not, then the City could construct a storage and pumping site at Bruner 
Road and Camelback Road that could be used for a second Tartesso BPS. If the Bruner Road facility is not 
constructed, then that capacity shown in Table 4.19 for the Bruner and Camelback site will need to go to 
the Tartesso BPS. 
Storage Capacity Evaluation 
Table 4.20 evaluates the required water storage infrastructure in Tartesso for each planning phase. The 
required storage in each phase is dictated by the City's performance criteria. 
Table 4.20 
Tartesso Water Storage Evaluation 
Tank 
Rated Capacity 
(MG) 
Available Capacity (MG) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Tartesso Tank 1 
2.0 
2.0 
2.0 
2.0 
2.0 
Bruner and Camelback Tank 2 
4.0 
0.0 
4.0 
4.0 
4.0 
Total Capacity 
6.0 
2.0 
6.0 
6.0 
6.0 
Required Capacity(1) 
 
1.8 
2.2 
2.8 
3.4 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
 
0.2 
3.8 
3.2 
2.6 
Notes: 
(1) Required capacity is calculated as one day of ADD without using more than 80% of the total storage capacity without wells.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-32 
Table 4.20 shows that an additional 4.0 MG storage tank will be required by 2030 to meet storage 
requirements for Tartesso. The existing Tartesso water campus site may be able to expand to the north, 
potentially providing enough space for an additional storage tank. If the potential site for a new storage 
and booster station at Bruner Road and Camelback Road is not constructed, then the capacity shown in 
Table 4.20 will need to be constructed at the Tartesso site. 
Water Distribution System Evaluation 
The PHD scenario was used for evaluating the Tartesso water distribution system to evaluate pressures. 
The water system was evaluated against the City's performance criteria as stated in Table 4.2. The 
modeled evaluation of the Tartesso distribution system showed that peak velocities were below 5 fps. The 
distribution pressures and pipe velocities are shown in Appendix A, Figure 4A.2. 
Pressures in the northeastern region of Tartesso did not meet the minimum pressure requirement of 
50 psi. This area is located in Pressure Zone 4, whereas most of Tartesso is located in Pressure Zone 3. To 
meet pressure requirements throughout Tartesso, two PRVs should be installed to create a pressure zone 
boundary between Pressure Zones 3 and 4. The recommended locations for these PRVs are shown in 
Figure 4.9 and summarized as follows: 
1. Indianola Avenue, just east of 296th Drive. 
2. Tartesso Parkway, east of 297th Avenue. 
Figure 4A.3 in Appendix 2A shows the junction pressures during a PHD scenario with the proposed PRVs 
in place. The proposed PRVs were given a setpoint to maintain a downstream hydraulic grade of 1,335 ft. 
In this configuration, the Tartesso pump station delivers to Zone 4, and then water is conveyed to Zone 3. 
An alternative solution would be to have dedicated pump stations for Zone 3 and Zone 4 which deliver 
appropriate pressures for each zone. However, there is not currently enough development in Zone 4 for 
efficient operation. In the future when Zone 4 is more developed, a Zone 4 pump station is preferred over 
the two proposed PRV stations. 
All Tartesso junctions maintained a residual pressure above 20 psi in a MDD plus fire flow scenario. 
4.5.3.5 
Infrastructure Projects 
The recommended infrastructure projects for Tartesso include the new wells, PRVs, and storage tank 
detailed in the previous sections. Additionally, transmission mains to serve future developments within 
Tartesso and groundwater treatment for the wells are included. The recommended infrastructure projects 
are shown in Figure 4.10 and summarized in Table 4.21. 
The Trigger column in Table 4.21 identifies when a project needs to be in service. Projects to address 
known deficiencies are assigned the 2030 planning year so that the projects are completed in the next 
5 years. Other projects need to be constructed in time to make sure that the performance criteria can be 
met. For example, the MDD will increase with new growth, so the timing of new wells needs to align with 
the requirement to supply MDDs. Some projects will be constructed when growth occurs in a 
geographical area. For example, a transmission main project serving a completely new development will 
need to be in place when that development is being constructed. For these projects, the trigger is the 
timing of a development, and the planning year of anticipated development is also provided to give the 
approximate time. As conditions change, the City will be able to make near-term adjustments to the time 
a project should start so that the project can be completed on time.

W Claren
d
o
n
Ave
N 29
8t
h
Ln
W
Columbus Ave
W Mitchell Ave
W Whitton Ave
Tartesso Pkwy
N 298th Dr
N 298th Ln
W Brindle
y
Ave
N 296th Dr
Ta
r
t
e
s
s
o
P
k
wy
N 298th Dr
W Indianola Ave
N 297th Dr
W
A
m
elia Ave
N 296th Ave
W Fair
m
ount Ave
W Pay
ne Av
e
W
Colu
mb
us A
ve
W Mitchell Ave
W Whitton Ave
N 295th Dr
N 296th Dr
N 296th Dr
N 297
th L
n
N 297th Ln
Tartesso Pkwy
Tarte
ss
o Pk
wy
N 298th Ave
N 297th Ave
Tartesso
Elementary
School
N 293rd Dr
N 293rd Ave
T
ar
te
sso
Pk
w
y
T
arte
sso
Pkwy
Ta
rtes
so
Pkwy
N 294th Ln
N
2
94th Dr
Tartesso
Community Park
N 293rd Dr
N 29
3rd
Dr
N 295th
Av
e
W Wel
do
n A
ve
W Payne Ave
W
Payne Ave
W Columbus
Ave
W M
itc
hell
Ave
W Whitto
n
Ave
W Clarendon
Av
e
W Clarendon Ave
N 29
3r
d Ave
N 292nd Dr
N 292n
d Ln
Tartesso P
W Clarendon A
ve
N 292nd Dr
"b)
"b)
!ã
U
T"
=)
Zone 3
Zone 4
W20.1
W20.2
Tartesso
Well #1
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
300
150
Feet
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.9  Tartesso Recommended Pressure Reducing Valve Locations
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
"b)
Proposed PRV
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
24
Pressure Zones
3
4
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

N
N
3
1
5
t
h A
v
e
W
In
dia
n Scho
ol
Rd
W Indian School Rd
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
Earll Dr
315th Ave
W Osborn Rd
Thomas
Rd
th Ave
W Camelback Rd
Be
th
any Hom
e
R
d
Bethany Home Rd
Sun Valley Pkwy
W Tar
t
e
ss
o
P
kwy
N
Br
oo
kl
yn
D
r
N
Br
o
okly
n Dr
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
W Thomas Rd
W Thomas Rd
Bruner Rd
N
30
3rd
A
ve
Tart
e
s
s
o
P
kwy
T
a
rt
es
so Pkwy
N Bruner Rd
Sun Valle
y Pkwy
W Tonopah Salome Hw
y
Ave
Ave
W Bellview St
W M
cDowe
ll Rd
W McDowell Rd
308th Ave
W Latham St
W Portland St
T
u
rner R
d
W Indian School Rd
N 277th Ave
Power Line Rd
W McDowell Rd
W McDowell Rd
Turner Rd
N Parker
"b)
"b)
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
3
Q
W64
W55
W2
5
W56
W56
W56
W56
W24
W24
W25
W25
W25
W25
W25
W24
W24
W24
W57
W57
W57
W56
W56
W56
W18.2
W19.6
W19.2
W18.3
W20.1
W20.2
W18.1
W19.1
W19.5
W23
W22
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
0.5
0.25
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.10  Tartesso Water Recommended Distribution Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
3
Q
Proposed WTP
U
T"
=)
Proposed Booster Pump
Station
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Proposed Well
!ã
Well
"b)
Proposed PRV
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
16
20
24
Proposed Water Main (inches)
12
16
24
Proposed Raw Water
Main
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-35 
Table 4.21 
Tartesso Recommended Infrastructure Projects 
Notes: 
(1) The timing of well projects is dependent on the flow rate performance of any new constructed wells and assumes that all existing well flow rates remain constant. 
(2) Dual PRV station, larger PRV size for fire flow is provided, smaller PRV to be sized in design. 
Project ID 
Facility Type 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Project Trigger  
(Year) 
W18.1 
Well 
Tartesso Well No. 4 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
1,200 gpm 
1 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W19.1 
Well 
Tartesso Well No. 5 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
1,200 gpm 
1 
MDD meets firm capacity of existing wells and W18.1(1) 
W19.5 
Well 
Tartesso Well No. 6 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
1,200 gpm 
1 
MDD meets firm capacity of existing wells and W19.1.(1) 
W18.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 
650 
Concurrent with Well No. 4. 
W18.3 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. Only needed if 
existing Tartesso BPS is expanded and Bruner and Camelback 
BPS is not constructed. 
8 
7,300 
Concurrent with Well No. 4. 
W19.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 
2,400 
Concurrent with Well No. 5.(1) 
W19.6 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 
1,850 
Concurrent with Well No. 6.(1) 
W20.1 
PRV 
Boundary between Pressure Zones 3 and 4 
Enable pressure requirements to be met throughout the 
Tartesso service area. 
6 inches(2) 
1 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W20.2 
PRV 
Boundary between Pressure Zones 3 and 4 
Enable pressure requirements to be met throughout the 
Tartesso service area. 
6 inches(2) 
1 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W22 
Groundwater Treatment 
Additional Tartesso Groundwater Treatment 
Treat groundwater from existing and future wells. 
3 mgd 
1 
As needed to match well capacity. 
W23.1 
Storage 
Bruner and Camelback Storage and Booster Station Meet storage requirements for projected future developments. 
4 MG 
1 
125% of ADD volume equal to 2.0 MG. 
W23.2 
Pump Station 
Bruner and Camelback Storage and Booster Station Meet pumping requirements for projected future developments. 
3,000 gpm 
1 
MDD plus fire flow of equal to 6,000 gpm. 
W24 
Potable Water Mains 
Additional Tartesso Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments. 
24 inches 
18,450 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W25 
Potable Water Mains 
Additional Tartesso Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments. 
12 inches 
76,600 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W55 
Potable Water Mains 
Additional Tartesso Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments. 
24 inches 
2,550 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W56 
Potable Water Mains 
Additional Tartesso Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments. 
12 inches 
38,800 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W57 
Potable Water Mains 
Additional Tartesso Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments. 
12 inches 
12,350 
Development in the Area (2040).

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-36 
4.5.4 
Central Buckeye 
The Central Buckeye water system is located primarily between I-10 and the Gila River, with some 
development immediately north of I-10. Central Buckeye includes pressure Zones 1, 2, and part of Zone 3. 
Most of the water distribution systems are continuous except for the Buckeye Airport and Bulfer areas. 
The water system is supplied by wells, and groundwater is more plentiful and of higher quality at the 
northeast and northwest ends of Central Buckeye. 
4.5.4.1 
2024 Water Infrastructure Description 
Wells 
Central Buckeye sources its water entirely from 17 wells, summarized in Table 4.22, with a production flow 
rate capacity of 15,454 gpm. 
Table 4.22 
Central Buckeye Wells 
Well 
Permitted Capacity (AFY) 
Production Flow Rate (gpm) 
Broadway No. 1 
1,031 
180 
Broadway No. 2 
750 
509 
Broadway No. 3 
660 
180 
Riata No. 2 
1,210 
400 
Sonoran Vista NE Well 
1,209 
500 
Sonoran Vista SW Well 
797 
420 
North Airport Road No. 1 
2,115 
2,400 
North Airport Road No. 2 
2,030 
2,800 
Farallon No. 1 
494 
500 
Farallon No. 2 
494 
550 
Sundance No. 1 
1,274 
700 
Sundance No. 2 
1,257 
800 
Sundance No. 3 
822 
700 
Sundance No. 4 
694 
950 
Sundance No. 7 
1,100 
500 
Sundance No. 8 
683 
1,050 
Sundance No. 9 
683 
500 
Bulfer 
56 
45 
Airport Well A 
80 
150 
Airport Well B 
1,450 
500 
Well No. 12 
256 
320 
Well No. 14 
473 
300 
Well No. 13 
645 
500

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-37 
Wells No. 12, No. 13, and No. 14 currently deliver water to Central Buckeye, however, are committed to 
serve developments on the Landowner's land in the future. The City is expected to lose access to these 
wells by 2027. 
Bulfer, Airport Well A, and Airport Well B are included in Table 4.22. However, these wells serve isolated 
areas that are not connected to the main Central Buckeye water distribution system. 
Pump Stations 
The Central Buckeye pump stations serve areas within Pressure Zones 1, 2, and 3. The pump stations that 
serve Central Buckeye are summarized in Table 4.23. 
Table 4.23 
Central Buckeye Pump Stations 
Booster Pump Station 
Number of Pumps 
Firm Capacity (gpm) 
Pressure Zone(s) Served 
Bales(2) 
3 
1,000 
1 
Buckeye North 
4 
500 
2 
Jacke A. Meck (Zone 1) 
4 
5,205 
1 
Jackie A. Meck (Zone 2) 
5 
5,024 
2 
Lower Buckeye(1) 
0 
0 
2 
North Airport Road 
6 
6,500 
3 
Rancho Vista(2) 
5 
1,850 
2 
Sundance Zone 2 
5 
3,000 
2 
Sundance Zone 3 
6 
6.000 
3 
West Park(2) 
5 
4,000 
2 
Notes: 
(1) Lower Buckeye pump station is offline and not expected to be brought back online. 
(2) Bales, Rancho Vista, and West Park are planned to be bypassed by 2030. 
The City plans to bypass the Bales, Rancho Vista, and West Park Phase 1 site once the Farallon Water 
Campus is completed, before 2030. Farallon Phase 1 is currently under construction and has a pumping 
capacity of 6,000 gpm. 
Water Storage 
Central Buckeye has 12 GSTs, summarized in Table 4.24, for a total of 13.0 MG of water storage. The 
Farallon Water Campus is expected to be constructed by 2030 with an initial storage volume of 2.0 MG, 
expandable to 4.0 MG in the future. A future Westpark treatment, storage, and booster station is planned 
for the Westpark development area to provide water services as this development grows. A second 
treatment, storage, and booster station named Grand View is planned near the Buckeye Canal and east of 
dean Road to serve planned development in that area.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-38 
Table 4.24 
Central Buckeye Water Storage 
Tank 
Capacity (MG) 
Bales 1 
0.6 
Bales 2 
0.5 
Farallon 
2.0 
West Park 
0.5 
West Park 
0.2 
Rancho Vista 
0.8 
Jackie A. Meck 
4.0 
Lower Buckeye 
0.0 
Buckeye North 
0.2 
Sundance 2 
1.6 
Sundance 1 
2.6 
North Airport Road 1 
1.0 
North Airport Road 2 
1.0 
Water Distribution Mains 
The Central Buckeye distribution system contains 329.4 miles of water mains. Table 4.25 summarizes the 
length of water mains by diameter. 
Table 4.25 presents the Central Buckeye water distribution system, water production facilities, and water 
storage tanks. 
Table 4.25 
Central Buckeye Water Mains 
Diameter (inches) 
Total Length (miles) 
6 and Smaller 
49.4 
8 
164.0 
10 
3.3 
12 
53.9 
16 
50.7 
18 
1.6 
20 
3.8 
24 
2.6 
30 
0.0 
Total 
329.4

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-39 
4.5.4.2 
Planned Development Areas 
Figure 4.11 shows the planned development areas in Central Buckeye. In Figure 4.11, lands to be 
developed are colored based on the development planning period. The development planning period is 
dictated by the first phase in which an area will have in-service developments and does not mean that 
area will be completely developed by that year. 
4.5.4.3 
Demand Projections 
The Central Buckeye water distribution system was analyzed based on the ADD, MDD, and PHD for each 
planning period. The demands for each planning period are summarized in Table 4.26. These demand 
projections include land that can be developed by 2040 since the land has a CAWS or because the land 
has a commercial or industrial land use classification that does not require a CAWS if not subdivided more 
than six times. Figure 4.12 presents the land areas in Central Buckeye that are planned for development by 
2040 and included in the flow projections in Table 4.26. 
Table 4.26 
Central Buckeye Demand Projections 
Planning Year 
Average Daily Water Demand (gpm) 
MDD (gpm) 
PHD (gpm) 
2024 
5,108 
9,194  
15,323  
2030 
8,943 
16,098  
26,830  
2035 
10,074 
18,134  
30,223  
2040 
11,345 
20,421  
34,036  
4.5.4.4 
Water System Capacity Evaluation 
Water Supply Evaluation 
Table 4.27 presents the results of a water supply evaluation to determine the required water supply 
infrastructure in Central Buckeye for each planning phase. The required supply in each phase is dictated 
by the City's performance criteria in Table 4.2.

10
a
assayampa
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
Loop 303
McMicken
Gila River
Liberty
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã !ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Perryville Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
Zone 3
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 3
Zone 4
Broadway
Well #3
Sonoran Vista
N.E. Well
Riata West
Well #2
Sonoran Vista
S.W. Well
Sun Valley
Well #2
Sun Valley
Well #1
North Airport
Rd Well #2
North Airport
Rd Well #1
Sundance
Well #4
Sundance
Well #8
Sundance
Well #1
Sundance
Well #3
Old Airport
Well "A"
Farallon
Well #2
Well #12
Well #14
Tartesso
Well #1
Tartesso
Well #2
Hopeville
Well #1
Buckeye
Airport
Well "B"
Sundance
Well #7
Bulfur/Primrose
Well #1
Sundance
Well #9
Tartesso
Well #3
Farallon
Well #1
Broadway
Well #2
Well #13
Broadway
Well #1
Sundance
North Airport
Jackie A.
Meck WC
Last Revised: November 03, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
1
0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.11  Central Buckeye 2024 Water Distribution System
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
3
Q
Water Campus or WTP
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
16
20
24
Pressure Zones
1
2
3
4
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

10
sayampa
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
Loop 303
McMicken
Gila River
Liberty
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã !ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Perryville Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
Monte Verde
Sundance
Sundance
Sundance
Sundance
Sundance
Copper Falls
Westwind
Silver Rock
Tartesso
Tartesso
Tartesso
Tartesso
Tartesso
West
Tartesso West
Elianto
Henry Park
Verrado
Sienna Hills
Desert Creek
Desert
Creek
Westpark
Westpark
Blue Horizons
Cipriani
Cipriani
Cipriani
Buckeye 252
Parkman Ranch
Miller
Crossings
Mountain View
Business Center
Mountain View
Business Center
Marwest
Marwest
Marwest
Former Cemex
Sand and
Gravel Quarry
Jackrabbit
Crossing
Paloma Vista
Mayfield
Algodon
Sundance
North Airport
Jackie A.
Meck WC
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
1
0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.12  Central Buckeye Development Areas
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
3
Q
Water Campus or WTP
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
16
20
24
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Master Planned
Community
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-42 
Table 4.27 
Central Buckeye Water Supply Evaluation 
Well(5) 
Well Flow Rate  
(gpm) 
Planning Year Maximum Day Demand (gpm) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Broadway No. 1 
180 
180 
180 
180 
180 
Broadway No. 2 
509 
509 
509 
509 
509 
Broadway No. 3 
180 
180 
180 
180 
180 
Riata No. 2 
400 
400 
400 
400 
400 
Sonoran Vista NE Well 
500 
500 
500 
500 
500 
Sonoran Vista SW Well 
420 
420 
420 
420 
420 
North Airport Rd No. 1 
2,400 
2,400 
2,400 
2,400 
2,400 
North Airport Rd No. 2(1) 
2,800 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Farallon No. 1 
500 
500 
500 
500 
500 
Farallon No. 2 
550 
550 
550 
550 
550 
Sundance No. 1 
700 
700 
700 
700 
700 
Sundance No. 2 
800 
800 
800 
800 
800 
Sundance No. 3 
700 
700 
700 
700 
700 
Sundance No. 4 
950 
950 
950 
950 
950 
Sundance No. 7 
500 
500 
500 
500 
500 
Sundance No. 8 
1,050 
1,050 
1,050 
1,050 
1,050 
Sundance No. 9 
500 
500 
500 
500 
500 
Well No. 12 
450 
450 
0 
0 
0 
Well No. 14 
300 
300 
0 
0 
0 
Well No. 13 
500 
500 
0 
0 
0 
Westwind Well No. 1(4) 
1,700 
0 
1,700 
1,700 
1,700 
Westwind Well No. 2(4) 
536 
0 
536 
536 
536 
Hopeville Well No. 1(6) 
250 
0 
0 
250 
250 
New Well No. 1 
850 
0 
850 
850 
850 
New Well No. 2 
850 
0 
850 
850 
850 
New Well No. 3 
850 
0 
850 
850 
850 
New Well No. 4 
850 
0 
850 
850 
850 
New Well No. 5 
850 
0 
850 
850 
850 
New Well No. 6 
850 
0 
850 
850 
850 
New Well No. 7 
850 
0 
850 
850 
850 
New Well No. 8 
850 
0 
850 
800 
850 
New Well No. 9 
850 
0 
850 
850 
850 
New Well No. 10 
850 
0 
0 
850 
850 
New Well No. 11 
850 
0 
0 
850 
850 
New Well No. 12 
850 
0 
0 
850 
850 
New Well No. 13 
850 
0 
0 
850 
850 
New Well No. 14 
850 
0 
0 
0 
850 
New Well No. 15 
850 
0 
0 
0 
850 
New Well No. 16 
850 
0 
0 
0 
850 
EPCOR White Tanks Surface Water(3) 
1,700 
1,700 
1,700 
1,700 
1,700 
Firm Supply(2)(7 
25,745 
10,669 
17,244 
19,944 
21,894 
MDD 
– 
9,194 
16,098 
18,134 
20,421 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
– 
1,476 
1,146 
1,810 
1,472 
Notes: 
(1) North Airport Road No. 2 shown as offline for redundancy. 
(2) The City is expected to lose access to the supply from Wells No. 12, 13, and 14 for Historic Buckeye by 2027. 
(3) The EPCOR White Tanks supply is expected to be online by June 2025. Considered as existing for analysis. 
(4) Westwind Wells are existing and will deliver to the proposed Westpark WSF-2 Water Campus.  
(5) Additional Westpark and Grandview WTP wells will be added but the number and capacities of these wells are not yet known.  
(6) Hopeville Well No. 1 is existing but not currently used due to high TDH, silt, or other concentration exceeding EPA MCL. 
(7) Firm supply assumes wells operate 75% of the time with 15% redundancy, per COB EDS 3-5.301, plus the EPCOR supply

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-43 
Table 4.27 shows a current deficit that is likely being addressed by pumping beyond the firm capacity with 
existing wells. In addition, six new wells will be required to meet demand requirements by 2030, an 
additional two wells by 2035, and eight more wells by 2040. An assumption of 850 gpm per well was 
assumed based on the production of other Central Buckeye wells. The actual number of wells needed to 
serve Central Buckeye will depend on actual well flows. Additional wells will be constructed to supply the 
Westpark and Grand View WTPS. The number of required wells can also be reduced by increasing water 
deliveries through the EPCOR White Tanks SWTP. 
The City is expected to lose the water supply provided to Historic Buckeye from Wells No. 12, No. 13, and 
No. 14 by 2027. These wells will then be used to serve private developments in the Cipriani area. An 
analysis of the water supply for Cipriani is provided below in Table 4.28. 
Table 4.28 
Cipriani Water Supply Evaluation 
Well/Plant 
Total Capacity  
(gpm) 
Planning Year MDD (gpm) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Well No. 12(1) 
320 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Well No. 14 
300 
0 
300 
300 
300 
Well No. 13 
500 
0 
500 
500 
500 
New Cipriani Well No. 1 
800 
0 
800 
800 
800 
New Cipriani Well No. 2 
800 
0 
800 
800 
800 
New Cipriani Well No. 3 
800 
0 
800 
800 
800 
New Cipriani Well No. 4 
800 
0 
0 
800 
800 
New Cipriani Well No. 5 
800 
0 
0 
800 
800 
New Cipriani Well No. 6 
800 
0 
0 
0 
800 
Firm Supply(2) 
5,920 
0 
2,400 
3,600 
4,200 
MDD 
– 
0 
2,302 
2,980 
3,743 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
– 
0 
98 
620 
457 
Notes: 
(1) Well No. 12 shown as offline for redundancy. 
(2) Firm Capacity is the well production x 0.75. 
Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
Table 4.29 presents an evaluation of the required pump station infrastructure in Central Buckeye for each 
planning period. The required pumping capacity in each phase is dictated by the City's performance 
criteria summarized in Table 4.2. Central Buckeye contains a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial 
developments, so the industrial fire flow requirement of 5,000 gpm was used in the evaluation.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-44 
Table 4.29 
Central Buckeye Water Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
Booster Pump Station 
Number of 
Pumps 
Capacity (gpm) or Demand (gpm) 
Firm 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Bales(2) 
3 
1,000 
1,000 
0 
0 
0 
Buckeye North 
4 
500 
500 
500 
500 
500 
Farallon 
4 
6,000 
0 
6,000 
6,000 
6,000 
Jackie A. Meck (Zone 2) 
5 
5,024 
5,024 
5,024 
5,024 
5,024 
Jackie A. Meck (Zone 1) 
4 
5,205 
5,205 
5,205 
5,205 
5,205 
Lower Buckeye(1) 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
North Airport Road(3) 
6 
6,500 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Rancho Vista(2) 
5 
1,850 
1,850 
0 
0 
0 
Sundance Zone 2 
5 
3,000 
3,000 
3,000 
3,000 
3,000 
Sundance Zone 3 
6 
6,000 
6,000 
6,000 
6,000 
6,000 
West Park(2) 
5 
4,000 
4,000 
0 
0 
0 
Historic Buckeye(4) 
3 
2,500 
2,500 
2,500 
2,500 
2,500 
WTP 5 
TBD 
3,000 
0 
0 
3000 
3000 
WTP 11 
TBD 
3,000 
0 
0 
0 
3000 
Westpark WTP(7) 
TBD 
3,000 
0 
3,000 
3,000 
3,000 
Grand View WTP(7) 
TBD 
3,000 
0 
0 
0 
3,000 
Total Pumping Capacity 
 
53,579  
26,579  
31,229  
34,229  
40,229  
Required Capacity(5)(6) 
 
 
15,323  
26,830  
30,223  
34,036  
Surplus/Deficit 
 
 
11,256 
4,399 
4,006 
6,193 
Notes: 
(1) Lower Buckeye is offline and not expected to be brought back online. 
(2) Bales, Rancho Vista, and West Park are planned to be bypassed by 2030. 
(3) North Airport Road taken offline for redundancy. 
(4) The City is planning to rehabilitate the Historic Buckeye station by 2030. 
(5) Industrial fire flow requirement (5,000 gpm) used for analysis. 
(6) Required capacity calculated as the larger of (a) PHD or (b) MDD plus fire flow requirement. 
(7) Westpark and Grand View WTP capacity is assumed. 
Two additional groundwater WTPs are planned by 2040. Table 4.29 shows that two new pump stations at 
the proposed WTP 5 and WTP 11 sites are required to meet pumping requirements through 2040. 
Table 4.30 provides a pumping capacity analysis for the Cipriani development area. 
Table 4.30 
Cipriani Water Pumping Capacity Evaluation 
Booster Pump Station 
Number of 
Pumps 
Capacity (gpm) or Demand (gpm) 
Firm 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Cipriani BPS  
TBD 
7,500 
0 
7,500 
7,500 
7,500 
Cipriani BPS Expansion 
TBD 
3,000 
0 
0 
3,000 
3,000 
Total Pumping Capacity 
 
10,500 
- 
7,500 
10,500 
10,500 
Required Capacity(1)(2) 
 
 
- 
6,281 
7,304 
7,900 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
 
 
0 
1,219 
3,196 
2,600 
Notes: 
(1) Industrial fire flow requirement (5,000 gpm) used for analysis. 
(2) Required capacity calculated as the larger of (a) PHD or (b) MDD plus fire flow requirement.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-45 
Storage Capacity Evaluation 
Table 4.31 presents an evaluation of the required water storage infrastructure in Central Buckeye for each 
planning phase. The required storage in each phase is dictated by the City's performance criteria 
summarized in Table 4.2. The City has a project to replace the two existing 1.05 MG tanks at North Airport 
with a single 4.0 MG concrete reservoir by 2030. The City's CIP program also shows that the existing 
1.5 MG Sundance 2 reservoir will be replaced with a 4.0 MG concrete reservoir by 2030. The Jackie A. 
Meck Water Campus currently has a single 4.0 MG reservoir but is planned to be expanded with a second 
and third reservoir. The Farallon Water Campus will initially have a 2.0 MG reservoir, but it is planned to be 
expanded to have a 4.0 MG storage capacity. 
Table 4.31 
Central Buckeye Water Storage Evaluation 
Tank 
Rated Capacity 
(MG) 
Available Capacity (MG) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Bales 1(2) 
0.6 
0.6 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
Bales 2(2) 
0.5 
0.5 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
Westpark(2) 
0.5 
0.5 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
Westpark(2) 
0.2 
0.2 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
Rancho Vista(2) 
0.8 
0.8 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
Jackie A. Meck 
12.0 
4.0 
8.0 
12.0 
12.0 
Lower Buckeye(1) 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
Buckeye North WTP 
0.2 
0.2 
0.2 
0.2 
0.2 
Sundance 2 
1.5 
1.5 
4.0 
4.0 
4.0 
Sundance 1 
2.6 
2.6 
2.6 
2.6 
2.6 
North Airport Road 1 
4.0 
1.0 
4.0 
4.0 
4.0 
North Airport Road 2 
1.0 
1.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
Farallon(3) 
2.0 
0.0 
2.0 
2.0 
4.0 
WTP 5 
4.0 
0.0 
0.0 
2.0 
2.0 
WTP 11 
4.0 
0.0 
2.0 
2.0 
2.0 
Westpark WTP(5) 
4.0 
0.0 
4.0 
4.0 
4.0 
Grand View WTP(5) 
4.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
4.0 
Total Capacity 
41.9 
12.9 
22.8 
30.8 
42.8 
Required Capacity(4) 
 
9.2 
16.1 
18.1 
20.4 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
 
3.7 
6.7 
12.7 
22.4 
Notes: 
(1) Lower Buckeye is offline and not expected to be brought back online. 
(2) Bales, Rancho Vista, and West Park are planned to be bypassed by 2030. 
(3) Farallon storage is designed to be expandable to 4 MG. 
(4) Required capacity is calculated as one day of ADD without using more than 80% of the total storage capacity without wells. 
(5) Westpark and Grand View WTP capacities are assumed; actual capacities are not known.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-46 
Table 4.32 shows that the City's existing and planned storage facilities are sufficient to meet storage 
requirements through 2040. In addition, two new storage tanks are listed at the proposed WTP 5 and 
WTP 11 sites as these sites are required for pumping capacity, and storage is needed at each site. 
Table 4.32 provides an analysis of the Cipriani development area's storage requirements. 
Table 4.32 
Cipriani Water Storage Evaluation 
Tank 
Rated Capacity 
(MG) 
Available Capacity (MG) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Cipriani Tank 1 
2.0 
0.0 
2.0 
2.0 
2.0 
Cipriani Tank 2 
 
 
 
2.0 
2.0 
Total Capacity 
4.0 
0.0 
4.0 
4.0 
4.0 
Required Capacity(1) 
 
0.0 
1.3 
2.3 
2.9 
Surplus/(Deficit) 
 
0.0 
2.7 
1.7 
1.1 
Notes: 
(1) Required capacity is calculated as one day of ADD without using more than 80% of the total storage capacity without wells. 
Water Distribution System Evaluation 
The PHD condition was used to evaluate the water distribution system. The water system was evaluated 
against the City's performance criteria, as summarized in Table 4.2 using the hydraulic model. The model 
analysis showed that maximum velocities were below 5 fps. Pressures in Central Buckeye were in the 
range of 50 to 110 psi during the PHD evaluation. The PHD pressures and pipe velocities are shown in 
Appendix 2A, Figure 4A.4. 
A MDD plus fire flow model analysis was completed. Portions of the distribution system in Historic 
Buckeye and Phoenix Skyline West did not meet minimum pressure requirements. This is due to the old, 
small-diameter pipes in these areas that were not sized to deliver current fire flow requirements. Pipe 
replacement projects are recommended to improve fire flow capacity. 
4.5.4.5 
Infrastructure Projects 
The recommended infrastructure projects for Central Buckeye include the new wells, pump stations, and 
storage tanks detailed in the previous sections. Additionally, transmission mains to serve future 
developments within Central Buckeye and groundwater treatment for the wells are included. The 
recommended capital projects are presented in Figure 4.13 and summarized in Table 4.33 for Central 
Buckeye. 
The Trigger column in Table 4.33 identifies when a project needs to be in service. Projects to address 
known deficiencies are assigned the 2030 planning year so that the projects are completed in the next 
5 years. Other projects need to be constructed in time to make sure that the performance criteria can be 
met. For example, the MDD will increase with new growth so the timing of new wells needs to align with 
the requirement to supply MDDs. Some projects will be constructed when growth occurs in a 
geographical area. For example, a transmission main project serving a completely new development will 
need to be in place when that development is being constructed. For these projects, the trigger is the 
timing of a development, and the planning year of anticipated development is also provided to give the 
approximate time. As conditions change, the City will be able to make near-term adjustments to the time 
a project should start so that the project can be completed on time.

10
sayampa
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
Loop 303
McMicken
Gila River
Liberty
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã !ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Perryville Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
W27
W27
W27
W76
W76
W83
W83
W77
W27
W24
W24
W25
W83
W83
W82
W82
W76
W77
W82
W24
W76
W76
W76
W28
W30
W27
W32
W78
W83
W83
W83
W83
W79
W73
W73
W77
W77
W81
W81
W81
W73
W81
W81
W81
W75
W72
W83
W72
W84
W27
W27
W25
W77
W76
W76
W56
W75
W27
W27
W29
W28
W81
W83
W31
W29
W77
W76
W76
W27
W74
W74
W32
W32
W80
W80
W56
W56
W57
W57
W44.2
W37.2
W89.2
W42.2
W67.2
W38.2
W39.2
W90.1
W86.2
W70.2
W18.3
W41.2
W45.2
W42.2
W43.2
W69.2
W88.2
W39.1
W40.1
W41.1
W37.1
W43.1
W42.1
W44.1
W45.1
W46.1
W47.1
W38.1
W48.1
W67.1
W69.1
W68.1
W70.1
W85.1
W86.1
W87.1
W88.1
W90.1
W91
Sundance
North Airport
Farallon WC
Jackie A.
Meck WC
WTP 5
WTP 11
W36
W53
W49
W92
W22
W35
W93
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
1
0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4.13  Central Buckeye Recommended Water Distribution Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
3
Q
Water Campus or WTP
3
Q
Proposed WTP
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
U
T"
=)
Proposed Booster Pump
Station
!ã
Well
!ã
Proposed Well
Water Main (inches)
6 and Smaller
8
12
16
20
24
Proposed Water Main (inches)
12
16
24
Proposed Raw Water
Main
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Master Planned
Community
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-48 
Table 4.33 
Central Buckeye Recommended Infrastructure Projects 
Project 
ID 
Facility Type 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(in/MG/mgd/gpm/AF) 
Length/Qty  
(feet or no.) 
Project Trigger (Year) 
W27 
Potable Water Mains 
Transmission Mains (SR 85 to Miller Road) 
Convey water to projected future developments between SR 85 and Miller Road. 
16 inches 
44,250 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W28 
Potable Water Mains 
Transmission Mains (Miller Road to Dean Road) 
Convey water to projected future developments between Miller Road and Dean Road. 
16 inches 
10,050 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W29 
Potable Water Mains 
Transmission Mains (Miller Road to Dean Road) 
Convey water to projected future developments between Miller Road and Dean Road. 
16 inches 
10,550 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W30 
Potable Water Mains 
North Airport Transmission Mains 
Convey Water to projected future developments in North Airport area. 
16 inches 
2,250 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W31 
Potable Water Mains 
North Airport Distribution Mains 
Convey Water to projected future developments in North Airport area. 
12 inches 
5,300 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W32 
Potable Water Mains 
North Airport Transmission Mains 
Convey Water to projected future developments in North Airport area. 
16 inches 
10,800 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W80 
Potable Water Mains 
North Airport Transmission Mains 
Convey Water to projected future developments in North Airport area. 
16 inches 
9,350 
Development in the Area (2040). 
W72 
Potable Water Mains 
Cipriani Distribution Mains 
Convey water to projected future Cipriani developments. 
12 inches 
10,500 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W73 
Potable Water Mains 
Cipriani Distribution Mains 
Convey water to projected future Cipriani developments. 
12 inches 
13,100 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W74 
Potable Water Mains 
Cipriani Distribution Mains 
Convey water to projected future Cipriani developments. 
12 inches 
9,800 
Development in the Area (2040). 
W75 
Potable Water Mains 
West of SR 85 Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments west of SR 85. 
16 inches 
41,750 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W76 
Potable Water Mains 
West of SR 85 Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments west of SR 85. 
16 inches 
24,650 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W77 
Potable Water Mains 
West of SR 85 Distribution Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments west of SR 85. 
12 inches 
5,250 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W78 
Potable Water Mains 
West of SR 85 Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments west of SR 85. 
16 inches 
2,600 
Development in the Area (2040). 
W79 
Potable Water Mains 
West of SR 85 Distribution Mains 
Convey water to projected future developments west of SR 85. 
12 inches 
8,550 
Development in the Area (2040). 
W81 
Potable Water Mains 
Liberty Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future Liberty developments. 
16 inches 
39,650 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W82 
Potable Water Mains 
Liberty Distribution Mains 
Convey water to projected future Liberty developments. 
12 inches 
10,650 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W83 
Potable Water Mains 
Liberty Transmission Mains 
Convey water to projected future Liberty developments. 
16 inches 
45,050 
Development in the Area (2040). 
W84 
Potable Water Mains 
Liberty Distribution Mains 
Convey water to projected future Liberty developments. 
12 inches 
2,700 
Development in the Area (2040). 
W35 
Groundwater Treatment 
Farallon RO Treatment 
Treat groundwater from existing and future wells. 
8 mgd 
1 
As needed to treat groundwater from new wells. 
W36 
Groundwater Treatment 
Airport Arsenic Treatment Expansion 
Treat groundwater from existing and future wells. 
TBD 
1 
As needed to treat groundwater from new wells. 
W37.1 
Well 
New Well No. 1 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 9,874 gpm(1) 
W38.1 
Well 
New Well No. 2 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 10,511 gpm(1) 
W89.1 
Well 
New Well No. 3 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 11,148 gpm (1) 
W90.1 
Well 
New Well No. 4 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 11,785 gpm (1) 
W41.1 
Well 
New Well No. 5 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 12,422 gpm (1) 
W42.1 
Well 
New Well No. 6 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 13,059 gpm (1) 
W43.1 
Well 
New Well No. 7 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 13,696 gpm (1) 
W44.1 
Well 
New Well No. 8 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 14,333 gpm (1) 
W45.1 
Well 
New Well No. 9 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 14,970 gpm (1) 
W46.1 
Well 
New Well No. 10 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 15,607 gpm (1) 
W47.1 
Well 
New Well No. 11 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD 16,244 gpm (1) 
W48.1 
Well 
New Well No. 12 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 16,881 gpm (1) 
W67.1 
Well 
New Well No. 13 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 17,518 gpm (1) 
W68.1 
Well 
New Well No. 14 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 18,155 gpm (1) 
W69.1 
Well 
New Well No. 15 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 18,792 gpm (1) 
W70.1 
Well 
New Well No. 16 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
850 gpm 
1 
MDD of 19,429 gpm (1) 
W39.1 
Well 
New Cipriani Well No. 1 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
800 gpm 
1 
Cipriani MDD of 1,200 gpm (1) 
W40.1 
Well 
New Cipriani Well No. 2 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
800 gpm 
1 
Cipriani MDD of 1,800 gpm (1)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-49 
Project 
ID 
Facility Type 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(in/MG/mgd/gpm/AF) 
Length/Qty  
(feet or no.) 
Project Trigger (Year) 
W85.1 
Well 
New Cipriani Well No. 3 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
800 gpm 
1 
Cipriani MDD of 2,400 gpm (1) 
W86.1 
Well 
New Cipriani Well No. 4 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
800 gpm 
1 
Cipriani MDD of 3,000 gpm (1) 
W87.1 
Well 
New Cipriani Well No. 5 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
800 gpm 
1 
Cipriani MDD of 3,600 gpm (1) 
W88.1 
Well 
New Cipriani Well No. 6 
Meet water supply demands for projected future developments. 
800 gpm 
1 
Cipriani MDD of 4,200 gpm (1) 
W37.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
2,450 
Concurrent with W37.1 
W38.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
950 
Concurrent with W38.1 
W39.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
900 
Concurrent with W39.1 
W40.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
2,850 
Concurrent with W40.1 
W41.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
4,950 
Concurrent with W41.1 
W42.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
5,300 
Concurrent with W42.1 
W43.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
5,100 
Concurrent with W43.1 
W44.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
20,500 
Concurrent with W44.1 
W45.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
3,750 
Concurrent with W45.1 
W46.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
2,700 
Concurrent with W46.1 
W47.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
1,250 
Concurrent with W47.1 
W48.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
1,600 
Concurrent with W48.1 
W67.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
600 
Concurrent with W67.1 
W68.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
1,550 
Concurrent with W68.1 
W69.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
6,900 
Concurrent with W69.1 
W70.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
1,400 
Concurrent with W70.1 
W85.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
1,250 
Concurrent with W85.1 
W86.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
1,100 
Concurrent with W86.1 
W87.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
1,300 
Concurrent with W87.1 
W88.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
1,450 
Concurrent with W88.1 
W89.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
500 
Concurrent with W89.1 
W90.2 
Raw Water Pipeline 
Raw Water Pipeline to Treatment Facility 
Convey water from wells to treatment facility. 
8 inches 
950 
Concurrent with W90.1 
W49 
Groundwater Treatment 
WTP 11 Site Treatment 
Treat, store, and pump groundwater from existing and future wells. 
4.25 mgd 
1 
As needed to serve nearby developments. 
W50 
Storage 
North Airport Road Water Campus Expansion 
Replace existing steel tanks with concrete storage reservoir. 
4 MG 
1 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W51 
Storage 
Sundance Water Campus Expansion 
Replace existing steel tanks with concrete storage reservoir. 
4 MG 
1 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W52.1 
Storage 
Additional Jackie A. Meck Storage 
Meet storage requirements for projected future developments. 
4 MG 
1 
Development in the Area (2035). 
W52.2 
Storage 
Additional Jackie A. Meck Storage 
Meet storage requirements for projected future developments. 
4 MG 
1 
Development in the Area (2040). 
W53.1 
Storage 
Farallon Storage 
Meet storage requirements for projected future developments. 
2 MG 
1 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W54.1 
Pump Station 
Farallon Pumping 
Meet pumping capacity requirements for projected future developments. 
8.5 mgd 
1 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W91.1 
Pump Station 
Cipriani Storage and Pumping 
Meet pumping capacity requirements for projected future developments. 
10.8 mgd 
1 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W91.2 
Pump Station 
Cipriani Pumping Expansion 
Meet pumping capacity requirements for projected future developments. 
4.3 mgd 
1 
As needed to meet future Cipriani growth (2035). 
W92 
Groundwater Treatment 
Westpark Site Treatment(2) 
Treat, store, and pump groundwater from future wells 
4.5 mgd 
1 
Development in the Area (2030). 
W93 
Groundwater Treatment 
Grand View Site Treatment(2) 
Treat, store, and pump groundwater from future wells 
4.5 mgd 
1 
Development in the Area (2035). 
Notes: 
(1) The timing of well projects is dependent on the flow rate performance of any new constructed wells and assumes that all existing well flow rates remain constant. 
(2) Capacity is assumed.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
4-50 
4.6 
Conclusion and Recommendations 
1. In Sun City Festival, additional storage and pumping requirements associated with growth will require 
facilities that do not fit on the current site. Additional capacity may need to be provided at an 
additional storage, treatment, and pumping site. Longer term, a future surface water treatment is 
planned near the development, so the additional storage and pumping capacity may be provided at 
that site. The land to be acquired for a SWTP should be large enough to enable plant expansions. 
Some of the smaller WTPs in Maricopa County are 15 acres. Middle-range treatment plants are about 
40 acres. 
2. The Floreo development will begin with groundwater supplies. In the future, water supplies could be 
partially provided by a SWTP at the CAP canal and a transmission main from the treatment plant to 
Floreo. 
3. The Tartesso development area will have a well-based water supply system with additional wells 
located on the western side of the developments where groundwater availability is higher. One 
additional treatment, storage, and booster station site will be needed. In the future, surface water 
supplies could come from the SWTP along the CAP canal, with a transmission main along Sun Valley 
Parkway Locating future wells near groundwater recharge facilities will increase the number of useful 
groundwater recharge credits that can be used from groundwater recharge. 
4. The Cipriani development will be served by a new, stand-alone water supply system within the 
planning period of this IWMP. 
5. In Central Buckeye, water supplies for growth will come from wells located near the northeastern and 
northwestern portions of Central Buckeye where water supplies and water quality are better. To the 
extent possible, the existing water production and treatment sites of North Airport Road, Jackie A. 
Meck, and Farallon will be used. When required by growth, one well treatment, storage, and pumping 
site named WTP 5 will be constructed west of SR 85, a second water treatment site named WTP 11 
will be constructed in eastern Central Buckeye north of the Buckeye Canal to serve the Liberty area. 
6. A Westpark Water Campus will be constructed near South 266th Avenue and West Warner Street, and 
a Grand View WTP will be constructed north of the Buckeye Canal on South Dean Road

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-1 
CHAPTER 5 WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN 
5.1 
Introduction 
Chapter 5 presents the wastewater system master plan as part of the 2025 IWMP. The purpose of the 
WWMP is to identify the wastewater system growth, infrastructure improvements, and timing to serve the 
City's needs through the 2030, 2035, and 2040 infrastructure planning periods. A hydraulic model was 
prepared to evaluate the capacity of the collection system in each infrastructure planning period to 
develop the Master Plan. Proposed future infrastructure was evaluated, the timing of future WWTF 
expansions was determined, and a plan for future collection system expansion was developed. 
The outline of this chapter is as follows: 
1. Wastewater System Overview – This section contains a summary of the overall wastewater system 
and the strategies that will be implemented in the plan. 
2. Performance Criteria – This section documents the performance criteria used to evaluate wastewater 
system infrastructure, which is based to a large extent on the City's EDS. 
3. Hydraulic Model – This section describes the wastewater collection system model used for the 
collection system capacity evaluations. 
4. Master Plan by Wastewater Service Area – This section presents the Master Plan, including 
infrastructure projects arranged by these wastewater systems: Sun City Festival, Floreo at Teravalis 
(Floreo), Tartesso, and Central Buckeye. Each wastewater system section contains the following 
subsections: 
a. 2024 Wastewater Infrastructure Description. 
b. Future Infrastructure. 
c. 
Collection System Evaluation. 
d. Wastewater System Infrastructure Improvement Program. 
5. Conclusions and Recommendations – This section contains conclusions and recommendations that 
are not infrastructure projects.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-2 
5.2 
Wastewater System Overview 
This IWMP study area covers those portions of the City that are north of the Gila River and that are not 
served by EPCOR. The study area covers approximately 432 square miles, although a portion of the land is 
mountainous and will not be developed. In the first phase of the IWMP, the planning area was grouped 
into six different WPAs (formerly called DAWS planning areas) that were originally seen as areas that 
could possibly become a designation of assured water supply. These geographical areas are significant for 
the wastewater system also because each area has one or more wastewater collection basins that deliver 
wastewater to a WRF. 
This IWMP covers growth through 2040, which is only a portion of the land in each WPA. The land areas 
planned for growth include developments that have a CAWS and land zoned industrial or commercial that 
may not need a CAWS if land parcels are not subdivided into more than six parcels. The land parcels are 
grouped by the planning periods within which the land is expected to develop: 2030, 2035, and 2040. 
Therefore, the infrastructure planned in this master plan focuses on the land areas planned to 
development by 2040. 
Figure 5.1 presents the WPAs and the land areas that are planned to develop by 2040, colored by 
planning period.

WR F
WR F
WR F
WR F
WWPP
WR F
WR F
WR F
WR F
Tartesso West
Elianto
Sun
Valley South
Cipriani
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
Floreo
at Teravalis
North Star
Ranch
Festival
Ranch
Teravalis
Festival
Ranch
WPA 1
WPA 3
WPA 5
WPA 2
WPA 4A
WPA 4B
RID Ca
nal
Buckeye
Canal
WRF 3
WRF 4/Grand
View
WRF
Floreo WRF
North Star WRF
Cipriani Package Plant
Central WRF
Sundance WRF
Tartesso WRF
Festival WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.1 Water Planning Areas and Development Planning Periods
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Water Planning
Area
WR F
Existing WRF
WR F
Future WRF
WWPP Future WWPP
Canal
Projected Development
Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-4 
5.2.1 
Wastewater Infrastructure Development Strategy 
Each WPA has unique water supplies and water supply strategies that influence the infrastructure that is 
being planned in each WPA, including wastewater infrastructure. This section provides background 
information and then a more detailed evaluation of each area is presented in Section 5.5. 
5.2.1.1 
WPA 1 
WPA 1 currently includes two developments: the Sun City Festival development and the Floreo 
development. Sun City Festival is currently partially developed and is expected to fully develop by 2040. 
Floreo is currently being constructed. Both developments have a WRF serving the development. The City 
would like the Floreo WRF to also serve the development in between the Sun City Festival and Floreo 
development, named the Sun Valley Villages I and II. Sewer trunk main sizing running north through 
Floreo would need to be upsized if some of this middle area sewers to Floreo. The Wastewater Master 
Plan for Floreo also identifies a portion of the Sun Valley east/southeast of Floreo potentially sewering the 
Floreo WRF at buildout. Any of these additional areas would require a 208 Amendment, and additional 
land would need to be acquired for the expanded plant size. 
North of the CAP, the Sun City Festival, and North Star Ranch developments will have a WRF north of the 
canal. The Teravalis development is expected to deliver wastewater to a future Teravalis WRF. 
5.2.1.2 
WPA 2 
The Tartesso WRF is planned to be a regional facility that serves the developments in WPA 2. The gravity 
sewer mains delivering wastewater to the Tartesso WRF is 60 inches in diameter, so it was designed to 
convey wastewater flows from a large area. However, the City does not own enough land at the current 
site to expand the Tartesso WRF to serve all of WPA 2, so the City will need to find a way to obtain 
additional land to expand or relocate the WRF. 
5.2.1.3 
WPA 3, 4A, and 4B 
Central Buckeye currently has two WRFs: Central WRF and Sundance WRF. The Sundance WRF serves the 
WPA 3 north of the RID canal and west of Perryville Road. The Central WRF is currently planned to serve 
the rest of Central Buckeye east of SR 85 and the Westpark development west of SR85.  
A Grand View WRF (formerly WRF 6 and WRF 4) could serve land areas east of Dean Road. However, the 
City's preference is to send the wastewater flows to the Central WRF and not the Grand View WRF. 
One WRF is planned to serve land west of SR 85. This WRF is referred to as WRF 3 (formerly WRF 5). One 
of the options that may be considered for Cipriani is to have a temporary package wastewater plant serve 
the Cipriani development until infrastructure is in place to more economically connect the Cipriani 
development to WRF 3 after WRF 3 is constructed. 
5.2.1.4 
WPA 5 
Much of WPA 5 is served by EPCOR's WRF, except for a 1-mile strip of land going north to Bethany Home 
Road. This strip of land is served by the Sundance WRF. A significant portion of this area is served by 
septic systems.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-5 
5.3 
Wastewater System Performance Criteria 
Performance criteria are the standards of measurement used to evaluate the adequacy of wastewater 
collection system infrastructure, including pipes (gravity and force main), lift stations, and treatment 
facility capacity. Performance criteria are based on legal requirements and engineering best practices. The 
City's EDS, adopted in 2025, contain the performance criteria used in the 2025 IWMP with a few additions 
and agreed upon revisions for this master planning effort. The IWMP does not replace engineering design 
in compliance with the Buckeye EDS and code requirements. 
The performance criteria used in the 2025 IWMP are described below. 
5.3.1 
Gravity Sewer Main Capacity 
Sewer main capacity depends on several factors, including pipe roughness, maximum allowable flow 
depth, limiting velocity, and pipe slope. 
Gravity sewer mains should be designed and constructed to have a minimum of 6 feet of cover and a 
minimum separation of 6 feet from potable water mains and reclaimed water mains unless the mains are 
provided with increased protection in accordance with EDS Section 4-1.203. 
5.3.1.1 
Pipe Roughness 
The Manning's coefficient 'n' is a friction coefficient that varies based on pipe material, size of pipe, depth 
of flow, smoothness of joints, root intrusion, and other factors. The A.A.C. requires a Manning's coefficient 
of 0.013 to design new sewer mains (EDS Section 4-1.202). For master planning purposes, an 'n' value of 
0.013 is used. 
5.3.1.2 
Flow Depth 
A flow depth capacity criterion is used to evaluate pipe capacity. This criterion is expressed as a ratio of 
maximum depth of flow (d) to pipe diameter (D). 
The EDS requires that new sewer mains should be sized for a d/D ratio of 0.75 during peak hour flow. The 
d/D for evaluating the capacity of existing sewer mains is recommended to be 0.82 because there is no 
need to replace an existing sewer main until flows are at the maximum capacity of the pipe, and in 
developed areas, flows are easier to predict than in undeveloped areas. This approach allows full use of 
existing sewer main capacity and avoids upsizing sewer mains prematurely. 
To minimize solids settlement in the pipe and to promote scouring, the standard practice is to size pipes 
for a minimum velocity of 2 fps when the pipe is flowing full. At this velocity, sewer flows will typically 
provide pipe self-cleaning. 
Table 5.1 lists the minimum slopes for maintaining self-cleaning velocities. The minimum slope listed in 
the table is 0.0008 foot per foot (ft/ft), which is the minimum practical slope for gravity sewer main 
construction.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-6 
Table 5.1 
Gravity Sewer Main Minimum Slope Requirements 
Pipe Diameter (inches) 
Minimum Slope (ft/ft) 
Dead-end 
0.0075 
8 
0.0040 
10 
0.0024 
12 
0.0019 
15 
0.0014 
18 
0.0011 
21 
0.0009 
24 
0.0008 
≥ 36 
0.0008 
Greater slopes are desirable if possible, provided the wastewater velocity does not exceed the maximum 
velocity criteria of 9 fps as defined in the EDS. 
5.3.1.3 
Manholes 
Manholes are typically installed at grade changes, changes in sewer main sizes, alignment changes, and 
intersections with other sewer mains. Manholes should be located to facilitate sewer cleaning. Table 5.2 
lists the recommended maximum manhole spacing for different sewer main diameters. 
Table 5.2 
Maximum Manhole Spacing 
Pipe Diameter (inches) 
Maximum Manhole Spacing (feet) 
8-15 
400 
18-30 
500 
≥ 36 
600 
Manholes with sewer mains intersecting at a 60-degree to 90-degree angle should provide 0.2 feet of 
invert drop across the manhole. Other manholes with sewer mains intersecting at less than or equal to 
60-degree angles should provide a minimum of 0.1 feet of invert drop. 
5.3.2 
Lift Station Capacity 
Lift stations should be sized for a "firm" capacity greater than the peak daily flow rate for the planned 
service area. Lift station firm capacity was compared to the peak hour inflow and sized to pump the 
maximum daily flow with the largest pump out of service. 
Lift station wet well sizing takes into consideration the fill time based on average flow and the minimum 
pump cycle. The A.A.C. R-18-9-E301(D) requires that the minimum wet well volume in gallons be 
one-quarter of the product of the minimum pump cycle time in minutes and the total pump capacity in 
gpm. The volume of the wet well should provide a retention period not to exceed 30 minutes of average 
daily design flow. Additionally, regional lift stations should be provided with additional wet well capacity 
for redundancy. The pump manufacturer's daily cycle recommendations should be used when selecting 
the minimum cycle time. Starting and stopping more than seven times an hour for any one pump is not 
recommended.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-7 
5.3.3 
Force Mains 
The EDS requires that force mains be sized to maintain a minimum flow velocity between 2 fps and 9 fps 
(EDS 4-1.202). A minimum velocity of 2 fps promotes scouring so that the solids deposited in the force 
main while the pumps are off will be transported downstream when the pumps are operating. 
A Hazen-Williams friction coefficient of 120 was used for force mains. 
5.3.4 
Water Reclamation Facilities 
Maricopa County is responsible for enforcing state regulations associated with water quality related to 
WRFs. WRF performance criteria requirements include the required design capacity of the treatment 
facility. When the average day maximum monthly (ADMM) flow reaches 80 percent of the rated design 
capacity of a WRF, design for a facility expansion must be initiated. When the ADMM flow reaches 
90 percent of the rated design capacity, construction of the expansion needs to have commenced. 
5.3.5 
Peaking Factors 
The City's EDS uses the population-based peaking factor as defined by ADEQ in R18-9-E301 for analyzing 
wastewater pipeline capacity. Table 5.3 shows the PFs for each upstream population range. 
Table 5.3 
Population Peaking Factor 
Upstream Population 
Peaking Factor 
100 
3.62 
200 
3.14 
300 
2.90 
400 
2.74 
500 
2.64 
600 
2.56 
700 
2.50 
800 
2.46 
900 
2.42 
1,000 
2.38 
1,001 - 10,000 
(6.33 x p – 0.231) + 1.094 
10,001 - 100,000 
(6.177 x p – 0.233) + 1.128 
> 100,000 
(4.5 x p – 0.174) + 0.945 
The WWTFs were evaluated against the projected ADMM wastewater flows. The ADMM flows are 
assumed to be 17 percent more than average daily flows.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-8 
5.4 
Hydraulic Model 
The City previously had a wastewater collection system model of the Central Buckeye area in the 
InfoSewer modeling software by Innovyze. This model was expanded to include the Tartesso and Sun City 
Festival area by taking the City's GIS data, facilities information, and land use to create the ability to model 
those areas. The City prefers the SewerCAD modeling software by Bentley, so the models were converted 
to SewerCAD for use in the IWMP. The models were used to size future gravity sewer mains and evaluate 
pipe capacity under peak-hour flows. 
5.5 
Master Plan by Wastewater Service Area 
The Buckeye wastewater collection system has five separate WRF basins within their four service areas. In 
this section, a separate plan is provided for each service area. 
5.5.1 
Sun City Festival 
5.5.1.1 
2024 Wastewater Infrastructure Description 
Wastewater Treatment Facilities 
The Festival Ranch WRF is located along 287th Avenue and south of Sun Valley Parkway. This WRF serves 
the Sun City Festival community, as shown in Figure 5.2. Wastewater is conveyed to this facility through a 
30-inch gravity sewer main that enters the plant from the north. The plant is designed and permitted for 
1 mgd with two planned 0.5 mgd expansions. The 2023 flows to the Festival Ranch WRF are 0.51 mgd 
average annual daily flow (AADF).

N 291st Ave
N
29
6
t
h
A
v
e
Sun Valley Pkw
y
W
Yukon D
r
Deser
t O
as
is B
lvd
W
Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
W Pi
N 25
N 251st Ave
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
Dr
W M
cRae
D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley Pkw
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
WR F
Festival WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.35
0.17
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.2  Sun City Festival 2024 Wastewater Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤8
10 - 15
16 - 24
30
WRF Service Area

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-10 
Gravity Collection System 
The Sun City Festival gravity collection system is comprised of 58 miles of gravity sewer mains ranging 
from 6 to 30 inches in diameter, and approximately 1,525 manholes. Table 5.4 presents a summary of the 
gravity sewer mains by diameter for the Sun City Festival collection system. As shown in Table 5.4, roughly 
90 percent of Sun City Festival's gravity sewer mains are 8 and 15 inches in diameter. Table 5.5 
summarizes the gravity sewer mains by material. 
Table 5.4 
Sun City Festival Wastewater Collection System Gravity Sewer Main Summary 
Gravity Sewer Main Diameter (inches) 
Length (miles) 
Percent of Collection System 
≤6 
0.2 
0.3% 
8 
46.7 
80.0% 
10 
1.0 
1.7% 
12 
1.8 
3.1% 
15 
5.7 
9.8% 
16 
0.1 
0.1% 
18 
0.0 
0.0% 
20 
0.3 
0.4% 
24 
1.2 
2.0% 
30 
1.2 
2.1% 
Total 
58.2 
 
Table 5.5 
Sun City Festival Sewer Pipe Materials 
Pipe Material  
Length (miles) 
Percent of Collection System 
Ductile Iron 
0.1 
0.1% 
Vitrified Clay 
26.0 
44.5% 
PVC 
32.4 
55.4% 
Total 
58.5 
 
5.5.1.2 
Future Infrastructure 
This section outlines planned facilities to serve future development areas in Sun City Festival through 
2040. The Festival Ranch Phase 2 development is directly west of the existing Festival Ranch community 
and will connect to the existing system via a gravity sewer main along Sun Valley Parkway. The phasing of 
the future developments is shown in Figure 5.3 The future 8-inch gravity sewer mains will be defined once 
the pipe data is in the GIS.

N 291st Ave
N
29
6
t
h
A
v
e
Sun Valley Pkw
y
W
Yukon D
r
Deser
t O
as
is B
lvd
W
Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
N 251st A
N 251st Ave
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
Dr
W M
cRae
D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
WR F
North Star
Ranch
Festival
Ranch
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
Festival WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.3
0.15
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.3  Sun City Festival Development Areas
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤8
10 - 15
16 - 24
30
Projected Development
Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-12 
5.5.1.3 
Wastewater System Capacity Evaluation 
A capacity analysis of the existing and future collection systems was performed to identify gravity sewer 
mains with insufficient capacity, if any. Sewer mains that lack sufficient capacity to convey peak flows can 
potentially cause sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). The collection system was evaluated based on the 
performance criteria listed in Section 5.1. 
2024 Pipeline Capacity Evaluation 
The 2024 wastewater collection system was evaluated using design flows based on the land use type and 
percentage developed, multiplied by the PF. The model predicted that the pipes in Sun City Festival have 
sufficient capacity to convey peak dry weather flows except for an 8-inch gravity sewer main along West 
Sierra Pinta Drive and North 267th Avenue, as shown in Figure 5.4. This predicted capacity limitation could 
be a discrepancy in the GIS data and a data anomaly should be investigated first before the pipeline is 
upsized. 
If a collection system capacity evaluation predicts that a pipe is out of capacity, the City should conduct 
flow monitoring where the pipe capacity is predicted to be limited. Flow monitoring is a relatively 
inexpensive way to validate model results before investing in a pipe replacement project. 
Future Pipeline Capacity Evaluation 
A capacity analysis of the planned future collection system for each planning period (2030, 2035, and 
2040) was performed by applying the planned future wastewater flows in the model to the existing and 
planned future pipes anticipated in each future planning period. The purpose of this evaluation is to verify 
pipes are adequately sized to convey future flows. 
The model predicts one gravity sewer main section that surcharges during the 2030 planning period. This 
gravity sewer main starts at Sun Valley Parkway and 265th Avenue and ends at Mountain Ridge Boulevard 
and Wahalla Lane. The 8-inch pipeline surcharges under 2030 peak dry weather flow. This pipe should be 
upsized to a 15-inch diameter pipe. The existing infrastructure deficiencies are shown in Figure 5.4. 
A model simulation of the recommended infrastructure under 2040 flow conditions is shown in 
Appendix 5A. Figure 5A.1 shows the d/D for each of the gravity sewer main to demonstrate that the pipe 
capacity is adequate.

N 291st Ave
N
29
6
t
h
A
v
e
Sun Valley Pkw
y
W
Yukon D
r
Deser
t O
as
is B
lvd
W
Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
N 25
N 251st Ave
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
Dr
W M
cRae
D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley Pkw
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
WR F
Festival WRF
8"
Last Revised: October 31, 2025pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.3
0.15
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.4  Sun City Festival Existing Pipeline Deficiencies
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Existing Gravity Sewer
Main
Gravity Sewer Main
Capacity Deficiency

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-14 
Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation 
The Festival Ranch WRF was evaluated with the projected wastewater flows to determine the need and 
timing for future WWTP expansions. The WRF capacity was evaluated against the ADMM flow rate. 
Table 5.6 shows the projected ADMM flows for the Sun City Festival WRF. 
Table 5.6 
Sun City Festival WRF ADMM Flow Projections 
WRF Basin  
Average Daily Flow of the Maximum Month (mgd) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Buildout 
Festival Ranch 
0.6 
1.4 
1.5 
1.6 
2.3 
The current capacity of the WRF is 1 mgd. As shown in Figure 5.5, the projected ADMM flow reaches the 
80 percent trigger for an expansion in 2025, so an expansion to 2 mgd is recommended by 2028. 
The capacity of Sun City Festival WRF assumes the facility utilizes existing technologies for treatment. 
However, the City has plans to upgrade treatment to membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology. If the 
treatment process is changed to MBR, then the plant may be expanded to 4 or 5 mgd. 
 
Figure 5.5 
Sun City Festival Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
5.5.1.4 
Infrastructure Projects 
Based on the collection system evaluation and improvement projects identified in Section 5.5.1.3, the 
following infrastructure projects are recommended as shown in Figure 5.6 and described in Table 5.7. 
The Trigger column in Table 5.7 identified when a project needs to be in service. Projects to address 
known deficiencies are assigned the 2030 planning year so that the projects are completed in the next 
5 years. Other projects need to be constructed in time to make sure that the performance criteria can be 
met. Project timing is crucial. For instance, WRF expansion is triggered when flow reaches 80 percent of 
capacity. Similarly, infrastructure projects serving new developments must coincide with construction 
timelines. For these, the development's anticipated planning year acts as the trigger. The City maintains 
flexibility to adjust project start dates based on evolving conditions, ensuring timely completion. 
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
Flow
(mgd)
Date
Average Day
Max Month
80% Capacity
Capacity

N 291st Ave
N
29
6
t
h
A
v
e
Sun Valley Pkw
y
W
Yukon D
r
Deser
t O
as
is B
lvd
W
Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
N 251st A
N 251st Ave
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
Dr
W M
cRae
D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
WR F
WR F
WW6
WW5
WW4
WW3
Festival WRF
WW2
WW1
O
0
0.3
0.15
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.6  Sun City Festival Recommended Infrastructure Improvements through 2040
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
WR F
WRF Improvement
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤8
10 - 15
16 - 24
30
Gravity Sewer Main
Improvement
Proposed Gravity Sewer
Main (inches)
15
Projected Development
Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-16 
Table 5.7 
Sun City Festival Wastewater Infrastructure Projects 
Project No. 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/mgd) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers  
(Year) 
WW1 
Increase gravity sewer main capacity from the 
intersection of Sun Valley Parkway and 
265th Avenue to the intersection of Mountain 
Ridge Boulevard and Wahalla Lane. 
Prevent surcharging under 
2030 peak flow. 
15 
7,900 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2030) 
WW2 
Expand capacity of Festival Ranch WRF from 
1 mgd to 2 mgd and convert to MBR. 
The average daily flow of the 
maximum month reaches 80% 
of the plant capacity. 
1 
1 
Wastewater flow reaches 80% 
of capacity. 
(2030) 
WW3 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main in Sun 
City Festival Development Phase 2 major street. 
Convey flow from future 
developments. 
15 
3,300 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW4 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main in Sun 
City Festival Development Phase 2 major street. 
Convey flow from future 
developments. 
15 
7,200 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW5 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main in Sun 
City Festival Development Phase 2 major street. 
Convey flow from future 
developments. 
15 
7,600 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW6 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main in Sun 
City Festival Development Phase 2 major street. 
Convey flow from future 
developments. 
15 
8,000 
Development in the area. 
(2040)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-17 
5.5.2 
Floreo at Teravalis 
5.5.2.1 
Planned Future Infrastructure 
This section outlines planned facilities to serve the Floreo development through 2040. The phasing of the 
future Floreo development areas is shown in Figure 5.7. 
The Floreo WRF is being constructed now and will serve development once homes are constructed. Floreo 
is a 3,040-acre planned mixed-use development located west of Sun Valley Parkway along Cactus Road. 
The Teravalis development is a 35,770-acre planned mixed-use development located west of the 
Hassayampa River Wash and is not expected to start developing before 2040 and will be served by its 
own WRF. 
The Sun Valley Villages development is an 11,910-acre planned mixed-use development along Sun Valley 
Parkway, south of Festival Ranch WRF. The development will send wastewater flows to the Floreo WRF, so 
the Sun Valley Villages major gravity sewer mains are included in the plan and the Floreo gravity sewer 
mains are sized to convey this flow. The wastewater from the Sun Valley Villages development is planned 
to flow along a parallel 36-inch gravity main to the Floreo WRF to avoid flow from going through the 
sewer mains sized for the Floreo development. Sewer trunk main sizing running north through Floreo 
would need to be upsized if some of this middle area sewers to Floreo. Additional land for the Floreo WRF 
and a 208 Plan amendment would be required to take wastewater from Sun Valley villages.

W
C
act
u
s
Rd
W
C
a
c
t
u
s
Rd
N
3
0
4
t
h
L
n
W
Indig
o
Way
S
W Teravalis Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
un Valley Pkwy
Floreo at
Teravalis
Teravalis
Sun Valley Villages
I and II
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch03\
O
0
0.25
0.13
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.7  Floreo Development Areas
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Projected Development Phase
2030
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-19 
Gravity Collection System 
The Floreo Phase 1 collection system is comprised of approximately 6 miles of gravity sewer mains 
ranging from 12 to 24 inches in diameter in addition to the 8-inch pipes that are not modeled. 
Wastewater Treatment Facilities 
The planned Floreo WRF will be in a wastewater campus off Cactus Road and Sun Valley Parkway on the 
east side of the Hassayampa wash. Development has already begun in Floreo Phase 1, so once flows 
exceed the limit for vault and haul, a 0.3 mgd package plant will be constructed before transitioning to a 
1.2 mgd WRF in 2035. The Floreo WRF ultimate capacity is only expected to be 3 mgd when only the 
developments served by the WRF are those with a CAWS. The WRF ultimate capacity goes up to 11 mgd 
with the addition of Sun Valley Villages. Flows will be delivered to the WRF by gravity. 
5.5.2.2 
Wastewater System Capacity Evaluation 
A capacity analysis of the future collection system was performed to determine if the proposed future 
gravity sewer mains or treatment facilities have sufficient capacity. Gravity sewer mains lacking sufficient 
capacity to convey peak flows can potentially cause SSOs. The collection system was evaluated based on 
the planning criteria listed in Section 5.1. 
5.5.2.3 
Future Pipeline Capacity Evaluation 
A capacity analysis of the planned future collection system with 2040 flows was performed to evaluate the 
collection system capacity. Appendix 5A, Figure 5.2 presents the d/D ratio model results for the buildout 
planning period. The actual pipe layout to Sun Valley Villages may differ. 
Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation 
The Floreo treatment facility was evaluated against the projected wastewater flows to determine the need 
and timing for future WWTP expansions. The City's WRF capacity is provided in terms of ADMM flows. 
Table 5.8 shows the projected wastewater ADMM flows for both Teravalis developments to illustrate the 
capacity of the WRF relative to the ultimate capacity. 
Table 5.8 
Floreo WRF ADMM Flow Projections 
WRF Basin 
Average Daily Flow of the Maximum Month (mgd) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Buildout 
Floreo 
0 
0.2 
0.4 
0.7 
11.0 
Teravalis 
0 
0 
0 
0 
28.9

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-20 
As shown in Figure 5.8, the projected ADMM flow surpasses the 80 percent trigger for expansion in 2030, 
so an expansion to 1.2 mgd is recommended before 2031. Actual development times may vary. 
 
Figure 5.8 
Floreo Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
5.5.2.4 
Infrastructure Projects 
Based on the collection system evaluation and improvement projects, infrastructure projects have been 
identified to serve additional growth are shown in Figure 5.9 and described in Table 5.9. 
The Trigger column in Table 5.9 identified when a project needs to be in service. Projects to address 
known deficiencies are assigned the 2030 planning year so that the projects are completed in the next 
5 years. Other projects need to be constructed in time to make sure that the performance criteria can be 
met. Project timing is crucial. For instance, WRF expansion is triggered when flow reaches 80 percent of 
capacity. Similarly, infrastructure projects serving new developments must coincide with construction 
timelines. For these, the development's anticipated planning year acts as the trigger. The City maintains 
flexibility to adjust project start dates based on evolving conditions, ensuring timely completion. 
 
 
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
Flow
(mgd)
Date
Average Day
Max Month
80% Capacity
Capacity

Ca
p Cana
l
Sun Valley P
W
H
as
sayam
p
a
Rd
Cap
Ca
n
a
l
S
u
n
V
a
ll
e
y
P
k
w
y
W
C
a
ct
u
s
R
d
W C
a
c
t
u
s R
d
N
3
0
4
t
h
L
n
W
I
n
dig
o
W
ay
S
W Teravalis Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
un Valley Pkw
y
W Bell Rd
W
Mc
Rae
Dr
W Bell Rd
WR F
Floreo at
Teravalis
Festival Ranch
Teravalis
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
WW9
WW8
WW11
WW7
WW10
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.5
0.25
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.9  Floreo Recommended Infrastructure Improvements through 2040
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
Proposed WRF
Proposed Gravity Sewer Main
(inches)
15
18
24
30
36
Projected Development Phase
2030
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-22 
Table 5.9 
Floreo Wastewater Infrastructure Projects 
Project No. 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/ mgd) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers (Year) 
WW7 
Construct a 24-inch gravity sewer main from the 
proposed Floreo WRF location to the Floreo 
development along Cactus Road. 
Convey flow from future 
developments to collection 
system. 
24 
4,800 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW8 
Construct a 12-inch gravity sewer main along Indigo 
Way Street from Larkspur Drive to Floreo Cir Street. 
Convey flow from future 
developments to collection 
system. 
12 
3,700 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW9 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Cactus 
Road from Johnson Road going west for 350 feet. 
Convey flow from future 
developments to collection 
system. 
18 
400 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW10 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Johnson 
Road from Catus Road to Larkspur Drive and along 
Larkspur Drive to 304th Lane. 
Convey flow from future 
developments to collection 
system. 
15 
2,500 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW11 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along 304th 
Lane from Larkspur Drive to Waddell Road and along 
Waddell Road to Sun Valley Parkway. 
Convey flow from future 
developments to collection 
system. 
15 
6,900 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW12 
Construct a 0.3 mgd Floreo wastewater package plant. Treat flows from future 
developments. 
0.3 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW13 
Construct a 1.2 mgd Floreo WRF. 
Treat flows from future 
developments. 
1.2 
1 
80% of the package plant 
is utilized. 
(2030) 
WW14 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Johnson 
Road from Greenway Road to Cactus Road. 
Convey flow from future 
developments to collection 
system. 
15 
9,600 
Development in the area. 
(2040)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-23 
5.5.3 
Tartesso 
5.5.3.1 
2024 Wastewater Infrastructure Description 
Wastewater Treatment Facilities 
The Tartesso WRF is located southwest of Tartesso along West McDowell Road, approximately 1 mile 
south of the Tonopah Salome Highway. This WRF serves the Tartesso Service Area, as shown in 
Figure 5.10. Wastewater is conveyed to this facility through a 60-inch interceptor that enters the plant 
from the north. The Tartesso WRF is intended to serve the entire Tartesso region of the City. For this 
reason, the main interceptor pipes are sized for significantly more flow than the current development. The 
WRF is currently permitted for 1.2 mgd. The 2023 flows to the Tartesso WRF are 0.63 mgd AADF.

School
Rd
W Indian School Rd
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
Earll Dr
N 311th Ave
315th Ave
N 313th A
v
e
W Osborn Rd
Thomas
Rd
N Johnson Rd
Ave
W T
a
rt
ess
o
P
kw
y
N B
roo
kly
n
Dr
N
Br
ooklyn
D
r
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
W Thomas Rd
W Thomas Rd
Bruner Rd Bruner R
d
N 3
03rd
A
ve
Ta
rt
e
ss
o
Pk
w
y
T
arte
sso Pkwy
N Bruner Rd
Sun Valley
Pkwy
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
ve
W Bellview St
W
McDowell
Rd
W McDowell Rd
308th Ave
W Latham St
W Portland St
N 299th Ave
Rd
rd Ave
W
WR F
Tartesso WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.25
0.13
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.10  Tartesso 2024 Wastewater Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤ 8
10 - 12
18
30
36
48
60
WRF Service Area

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-25 
Gravity Collection System 
The City's wastewater collection system in Tartesso is comprised of 35 miles of gravity sewer mains 
ranging from 6 to 60 inches in diameter, with approximately 730 manholes. Table 5.10 presents a 
summary of the gravity sewer mains by diameter. As shown in Table 5.10, roughly 73 percent of Tartesso's 
gravity sewer mains are 8-inch diameter. 
Table 5.10 
Tartesso Wastewater Collection System Gravity Sewer Main Summary 
Diameter (inches) 
Length (miles) 
Percent of Collection System 
6 
0.1 
0.3% 
8 
25.2 
72.8% 
10 
1.4 
4.1% 
12 
1.1 
3.1% 
18 
2.4 
6.9% 
30 
2.6 
7.6% 
36 
0.0 
0.1% 
48 
0.2 
0.5% 
60 
1.6 
4.6% 
Total 
34.6 
 
5.5.3.2 
Future Infrastructure 
This section outlines planned facilities to serve future growth areas for development in Tartesso through 
2040. The phasing of the future developments is shown in Figure 5.11. 
Tartesso West and Elianto are developments that are expected to begin by 2040. The Tartesso West 
development is a 3,160-acre planned residential development located directly north of the existing 
Tartesso development. It will connect to the existing system via a gravity sewer main along North 
311th Avenue. The Elianto development is a 3,900-acre planned mixed-use development located east of 
the existing Tartesso development along Sun Valley Parkway. 
Sun Valley South is an additional development with a CAWS planned to connect to the Tartesso collection 
system, but it is not expected to develop in the next 15 years. A 208 Amendment has been submitted to 
the City to incorporate the Sun Valley South area into the Tartesso WRF service area. The development is 
north of Elianto and is planned to be primarily a residential community.

Sun Val
ley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
Skyline
Regional Park
Tartesso
Elianto
Sun Valley
South
WR F
Tartesso
Tartesso West
Elianto
Montiere
Sun Valley
South
Desert Creek
Valle Del Sol
Valle
Del Rio
Tartesso WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.65
0.33
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.11  Tartesso Development Areas
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤ 8
10 - 12
18
30
36
48
60
Development Phasing
2030
2035
2040
Existing
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-27 
5.5.3.3 
Wastewater System Capacity Evaluation 
A capacity analysis of the existing and future collection systems was performed to determine if the 
collection system has sufficient capacity. Sewer mains that lack sufficient capacity to convey peak flows 
can potentially cause SSOs. The collection system was evaluated based on the planning criteria listed in 
Section 5.1. 
2024 Pipeline Capacity Evaluation 
In collection system capacity evaluations, if the model predicts a pipe that is out of capacity, then flow 
monitoring where the pipe capacity is predicted to be limited is recommended. Flow monitoring is a 
relatively inexpensive way to validate model results before investing in pipe replacement. 
The 2024 wastewater collection system was evaluated using design flows based on the land use type and 
percentage developed, multiplied by the PF. The model predicted that the existing pipes in Tartesso have 
sufficient capacity to convey peak dry weather flows. 
Future Pipeline Capacity Evaluation 
A capacity analysis of the planned future collection system (2030, 2035, and 2040) was performed by 
applying the planned future wastewater flows in the model with the existing and planned future pipes in 
each planning period. The purpose of this evaluation is to verify that pipes are adequately sized. The 
model predicted that the existing pipes in Tartesso have sufficient capacity to convey peak dry weather 
flows for the future planning years. A simulation of the future infrastructure with 2040 flows is shown in 
Appendix 5A.3. Future pipelines were placed in the mile streets to represent growth in future areas. The 
actual pipe layout may differ as developments are planned in greater detail. 
Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation 
The Tartesso WRF was evaluated against the projected wastewater flows to determine the need and 
timing for future WWTP expansions. The City's WRF capacity is evaluated based on ADMM flows. 
Table 5.11 shows the current ADMM flow for the Tartesso WRF relative to the projected buildout flow. 
Table 5.11 
Tartesso WRF ADMM Flow Projections 
WRF Basin  
Average Daily Flow of the Maximum Month (mgd) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Buildout 
Tartesso 
0.7 
1.0 
1.3 
1.6 
23.6 
The capacity of Tartesso WRF assumes the facility utilizes existing technologies for treatment. However, 
the City has plans to upgrade treatment to MBR which would raise the total available capacity of the 
treatment plant for the same footprint and potentially delay expansion triggers. 
The current capacity of the treatment facility is 1.2 mgd. As shown in Figure 5.12, the projected ADMM 
flow surpasses the 80 percent trigger expansion in 2031, so an expansion to 2.5 mgd is recommended 
before 2033.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-28 
 
Figure 5.12 Tartesso Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
5.5.3.4 
Infrastructure Projects 
Based on the collection system evaluation and improvement projects identified in Section 5.5.2.3, the 
following infrastructure projects have been identified and are shown in Figure 5.13 and described in 
Table 5.12. 
The trigger column in Table 5.12 identified when a project needs to be in service. Projects to address 
known deficiencies are assigned the 2030 planning year so that the projects are completed in the next 
5 years. Other projects need to be constructed in time to make sure that the performance criteria can be 
met. Project timing is crucial. For instance, WRF expansion is triggered when flow reaches 80 percent of 
capacity. Similarly, infrastructure projects serving new developments must coincide with construction 
timelines. For these, the development's anticipated planning year acts as the trigger. The City maintains 
flexibility to adjust project start dates based on evolving conditions, ensuring timely completion. 
 
 
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
Flow
(mgd)
Date
Average Day
Max Month
80% Capacity
Capacity

N 3
N
3
1
5
t
h A
v
e
W
I
ndi
an S
c
hool
Rd
W Indian School Rd
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
Earll Dr
N 311th Ave
315th Ave
W Osborn Rd
Thomas
Rd
N Johnson Rd
W Camelback Rd
B
eth
any Hom
e
R
d
Bethany Home Rd
Sun Valley Pkwy
W Ta
rt
e
ss
o
P
kwy
N
Br
oo
kl
yn
Dr
N
Br
o
okly
n
Dr
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
W Thomas Rd
W Thomas Rd
Bruner Rd
N
30
3rd
A
ve
Tart
e
s
s
o
P
kwy
T
a
r
tes
so Pkwy
N Bruner Rd
Sun Valle
y Pkwy
W Tonopah Salome Hw
y
W M
cDowe
ll Rd
W McDowell Rd
T
u
rner R
d
W Indian School Rd
N 277th Ave
Power Line Rd
W McDowell Rd
W McDowell Rd
WR F
WR F
Tartesso WRF
WW23
WW22
WW17
WW18
WW25
WW20
WW21
WW24
WW16
WW19
WW15
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.5
0.25
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.13  Tartesso Recommended Infrastructure Improvements through 2040
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
WR F
WRF Improvement
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤ 8
10 - 12
18
30
36
48
60
Proposed Gravity Sewer Main
(inches)
15
18
21
24
30
36
Development Phasing
2030
2035
2040
Existing
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-30 
Table 5.12 
Tartesso Wastewater Infrastructure Projects 
Project No. Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/ mgd) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers  
(Year) 
WW15 
Construct a 36-inch gravity sewer main along Thomas 
Road from Bruner Road to Sun Valley Parkway and along 
Sun Valley Parkway from Thomas Road to Camelback 
Road. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
36 
15,700 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW16 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Indian 
School Road from Sun Valley Parkway to Wilson Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
15 
3,900 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW17 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Indian 
School Road from Wilson Avenue to 280th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
15 
2,100 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW18 
Construct a 24-inch gravity sewer main along Camelback 
Road from Sun Valley Parkway to Wilson Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
24 
2,900 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW19 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Camelback 
Road from Wilson Avenue to Turner Road. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
15 
5,900 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW20 
Construct a 30-inch gravity sewer main along 311th 
Avenue from Indian School Road to Camelback Road. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
30 
5,200 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW21 
Construct a 24-inch gravity sewer main along Camelback 
Road from 311th Avenue to 305th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
24 
3,300 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW22 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Camelback 
Road from 305th Avenue to Bruner Road. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
15 
2,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW23 
Expand Tartesso WRF from 1.2 mgd to 2.5 mgd total 
capacity. 
Treat flow from future developments. 
1.25 
1 
Wastewater flow reaches 
80% of capacity. 
(2032) 
WW24 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Earll Drive 
from 280th Avenue to Sun Valley Parkway. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
15 
4,400 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW25 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Indian 
School Road from 280th Avenue to Turner Road. 
Convey flow from future developments 
to collection system. 
15 
4,400 
Development in the area. 
(2040)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-31 
5.5.4 
Central Buckeye 
5.5.4.1 
2024 Wastewater Infrastructure Description 
Wastewater Treatment Facilities 
Central Buckeye has two WRFs, the Central WRF and the Sundance WRF. Figure 5.14 presents the four 
planned basins in Central Buckeye that are part of the collection system plan. Figure 5.14 presents the 
locations of the Central and Sundance WRFs and their respective existing wastewater service areas. 
The Central WRF is located on 7th Street, south of Beloat Road. Wastewater is conveyed to this facility 
through a 66-inch interceptor that enters the plant from the north. The plant is permitted for 4.5 mgd. The 
2023 flows to the Central WRF are 2.60 mgd AADF. 
Sundance WRF is located north of RID Canal and east of Dean Road. Wastewater is conveyed to this 
facility through a 30-inch gravity sewer main, a 16-inch force main from the east, and an 8-inch gravity 
sewer main from the north. The plant is designed and permitted for 3.5 mgd. The 2023 flows to the 
Sundance WRF are 2.11 mgd AADF. 
Gravity Collection System 
The City's Central Buckeye wastewater collection system is comprised of 263 miles of gravity sewer mains 
ranging from 4 to 66 inches in diameter, with approximately 6,011 manholes. Table 5.13 presents a 
summary of the gravity sewer mains by diameter. As shown in Table 5.13, roughly 92 percent of Central 
Buckeye's gravity sewer mains are 15 inches or less in diameter. Figure 5.15 presents the 2024 wastewater 
collection system, including gravity sewer mains, lift stations, and WRFs. 
Table 5.13 
Central Buckeye Gravity Sewer Main Summary 
Diameter (inches) 
Length (miles) 
Percent of Collection System 
≤6 
11.0 
4.2% 
8 
189.4 
72.1% 
10 
15.2 
5.8% 
12 
14.1 
5.4% 
15 
12.1 
4.6% 
16 
0.4 
0.2% 
18 
8.4 
3.2% 
21 
2.2 
0.8% 
24 
5.2 
2.0% 
27 
0.6 
0.2% 
30 
2.2 
0.8% 
36 
0.9 
0.3% 
42 
0.1 
0.1% 
60 
0.5 
0.2% 
66 
0.3 
0.1% 
Unknown 
0.3 
0.1% 
Total 
262.9

10
Hassayampa
River
Dixie
Hassayampa
Arlington
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Skyline
Regional Park
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
10
McMicken
Gila River
P
Liberty
WR F
WR F
WR F
WR F
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Camelback Rd
Bethany
Home Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo
Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
Perryville Rd
Central WRF
Sundance WRF
4
3
2
1
WRF 3
WRF 4/ Grand
View WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
1.5
0.75
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.14 Central Buckeye Planned Wastewater Collection Basins
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Collection Basins
1
2
3
4
WR F
 WRF
WR F
 Proposed WRF

10
10
Hassayampa
River
Dixie
Hassayampa
Arlington
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Skyline
Regional Park
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
McMicken
Gila River
Liberty
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Camelback Rd
Bethany Home Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
Perryville Rd
Central WRF
Industrial
Park Lift
Station
Blue Horizon
Lift Station
Shadow Canyon
Lift Station
Sundance WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
1.5
0.75
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.15  Central Buckeye 2024 Wastewater Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
"
=)
Lift Station
Force Main
WR F
WRF
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤8
10 - 12
15 - 18
21 - 36
42 - 66
Central WRF Basin
Sundance WRF Basin

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-34 
5.5.4.2 
Lift Stations 
Most of the City's collection system flows directly to a WRF by gravity. However, lift stations are required 
at several locations. The City currently operates and maintains four wastewater lift stations and 7.9 miles 
of force main with diameters of 4 inches up to 16 inches, as shown in Figure 5.15. Table 5.14 summarizes 
lift station location, number of pumps, pump capacity, and force main diameter. 
Table 5.14 
Central Buckeye Lift Station Facilities 
Lift Station Name 
Location 
Number of 
Pumps 
Pump 
Capacity 
(gpm) 
Lift Station Firm 
Capacity 
(gpm) 
Force Main 
Diameter 
(inch) 
Buckeye Industrial 
Park 
South Turner Road and Buckeye 
Canal Road. 
2 
517 
517 
8 
Shadow Canyon 
West Jefferson Street and 
238th Lane. 
2 
30 
30 
4 
Blue Horizon 
West Yuma Road and 200th Lane. 2 
4,252 
4,252 
16 
Broadway Lift Station 25270 West Broadway Road 
2 
140 
140 
6 
5.5.4.3 
Future Infrastructure 
This section outlines planned facilities to serve future growth areas for the development of Central 
Buckeye through 2040. Plans for Central Buckeye are split between the west and east of SR 85. Land East 
of SR 85 currently has two collection system basins that will be evaluated as Option 1 East and a possible 
third basin that will be evaluated as Option 2 East. West of SR 85 contains Basin 3 and a small portion of 
Basin 1 along Turner Road and Baseline Road and along Turner Road and the RID Canal. The Cipriani 
development will have a package WWTP serving the area in the near term. 
5.5.4.4 
Infrastructure East of Maricopa County (MC) SR 85 
Sundance 
The Sundance collection basin will ultimately be developed and will send wastewater flows to the 
Sundance WRF. The collection basin has developments that are served by septic tanks, and these 
developments are not planned to be converted to public sewer service. 
The City plans to accept a wastewater flow of approximately 0.7 mgd on a permanent basis from EPCOR 
that would be delivered to the Sundance WRF because the EPCOR WRF site does not have space for an 
additional expansion. Buckeye would obtain ownership of the reclaimed water that is produced from the 
EPCOR wastewater. 
The Sundance WRF is planned to require a treatment capacity of 4 mgd by 2040 and 9 mgd by buildout.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-35 
Central 
The Central WRF is planned to serve land that is mostly east of SR 85. 
The areas projected to develop on the east side of Central Buckeye are primarily industrial developments 
starting on Dean Road and going east along Baseline Road. These developments are separated from the 
existing collection system of Central Buckeye in Basin 4. Because of this separation, the flow from the 
developments in Basin 4 would either need to be pumped to the existing collection system or establish a 
new independent collection system with a new WRF. 
Two options for the Central WRF on the east side of Central Buckeye have been analyzed in this IWMP. 
Option 1 East is to expand the Central WRF to serve land areas east of SR 85 that are not in the Sundance 
basin. A lift station along Dean Road and Union Pacific Railroad would be constructed in the 2035 
planning period to serve the developments north of Union Pacific Railroad in Basin 4 and to pump flow 
across the railroad tracks. An additional lift station at the intersection of Dean Road and Baseline Road 
would be constructed in the 2035 planning period to pump wastewater flow from the new developments 
on the east side of SR 85 to the gravity sewer main on Apache Road and Monroe Avenue, which will then 
convey wastewater to the Central WRF. Future infrastructure for Option 1 East is presented in Figure 5.16. 
Option 2 East is to have future Grand View WRF (previously called WRF 6) serving Basin 4 that would be 
constructed near Southern Avenue and Dean Road to serve the eastern portion of Central Buckeye. A 
208 Amendment is being prepared, which defines the service area of Grand View WRF starting east of 
Dean Road so the developments along Southern Avenue from 231st Avenue to Dean Road may be 
connected to the Central WRF collection system by a lift station if it is not included in the Grand View 
service area. Then, the Central WRF would serve the land areas east of SR 85 that are not in the Sundance 
or Grand View WRF basins. Grand View WRF would be located out of the Gila River 100-year floodplain so 
the location would require a lift station along Baseline Road and Dean Road to pump flow from the 
southern parts of Basin 4 located in the floodplain. Future infrastructure for Option 2 East is presented in 
Figure 5.17. 
Both options need a lift station along Broadway Road to serve the future Rainbow Ranch development. 
The lift station is used to pump flow from a lower elevation at the development to the existing system 
along Watson Road. The lift station could potentially be moved farther south to the Roeser Road or 
Southern Avenue alignments if additional developers were come in and be served by the Watson Road 
sewer main.

10
Sundance Golf
Club
Gila River
85
10
Valencia
Allenville
Buckeye
303
10
10
10
Gila River
P
Liberty
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
4
3
2
1
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch03\
O
0
1
0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.16  Central Buckeye Option 1 Future Infrastructure East of SR 85
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
FM
Proposed FM
"
=)
LS
"
=)
Proposed LS
WR F
WRF
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤8
10 - 12
15 - 18
21 - 36
42 - 66
Proposed Gravity Sewer Main
(inches)
15
18-21
24
30-36
42-48
60-66
Collection Basins
1
2
3
4
5
Projected Development Phase
2030
2035
2040
Existing
Post 2040

#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
"
=)
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
4
3
2
1
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch03\
O
0
1
0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.17  Central Buckeye Option 2 Future Infrastructure East of SR 85
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
FM
Proposed FM
"
=)
LS
"
=)
Proposed LS
WR F
WRF
WR F
Proposed WRF
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤8
10 - 12
15 - 18
21 - 36
42 - 66
Proposed Gravity Sewer
Main (inches)
15
18-21
24
30-36
42-48
60-66
Collection Basins
1
2
3
4
5
Projected Development
Phase
2030
2035
2040
Existing
Post 2040

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-38 
5.5.4.5 
Infrastructure Options West of MC SR 85 
The Cipriani development is projected to develop in the 2030 phase, and it is separated from the existing 
Central WRF collection system. In the interim before WRF 3 is constructed in Basin 3, a package plant is 
planned to be constructed in the 2030 planning period to serve Cipriani. In the post-2030 planning 
period, the package plant would be phased out, and a lift station would be constructed to pump flow 
from Cipriani to a future WRF 3 that will serve Basin 3. Another lift station would need to be constructed 
on the west side of Cipriani to overcome elevation differences and pump wastewater flow to Johnson 
Road. Figure 5.18 presents the proposed wastewater collection system infrastructure for West of MC 
SR 85. 
Wastewater from the developable area along SR 85 would be directed south to a future lift station. The 
wastewater would then be pumped east to the Central WRF until wastewater flows are high enough to 
construct WRF 3. A pipe capacity evaluation is needed to determine if wastewater flows that originate 
west of SR85 can be conveyed through the existing pipes along Rooks Road. 
Four additional lift stations would need to be constructed West of MC SR 85 to allow wastewater to cross 
the Buckeye and RID canals. A lift station is proposed to be constructed along Hazen Road to pump 
wastewater from developments south of the Buckeye Canal to the gravity sewer main along Union Pacific 
Railroad. Two additional lift stations are proposed along the Palo Verde Road and Johnson Road to get 
wastewater across the RID Canal before connecting to gravity sewer mains.

10
Hassayampa
River
Dixie
Hassayampa
Palo Verde
10
10
Sundance G
Club
Gila River
85
10
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WWPP
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
4
3
2
1
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch03\
O
0
1
0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.18  Central Buckeye Future Infrastructure West of SR 85
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
"
=)
LS
"
=)
Proposed LS
FM
Proposed FM
WR F
WRF
WR F
Proposed WRF
WWPP Proposed Package
Plant
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤8
10 - 12
15 - 18
21 - 36
42 - 66
Proposed Gravity Sewer
Main (inches)
15
18-21
24
30-36
42-48
60-66
Collection Basins
1
2
3
4
5
Projected Development
Phase
2030
2035
2040
Existing
Post 2040

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-40 
5.5.4.6 
Wastewater System Capacity Evaluation 
2024 Pipeline Capacity Evaluation 
The 2024 wastewater collection system was evaluated using design flows based on the land use type and 
percentage developed, multiplied by the PF. The model predicted that the existing pipes in Central 
Buckeye have sufficient capacity to convey peak dry weather flows except for portions of the gravity 
pipeline along Watson Road. The pipeline runs out of capacity once the commercial area along Watson 
Road and Yuma Road is reconnected to the Central WRF service area basin. The 2025 deficiencies are 
shown in red in Figure 5.19 and summarized below. 
 
WW26 (Watson Road and Lower Buckeye Road) – This project consists of replacing approximately 
5,303 feet of 12-inch diameter pipeline along Watson Road from Lower Buckeye Road to Burton 
Avenue—the existing pipeline surcharges under 2030 peak flow. To provide adequate capacity, the 
pipeline should be replaced with a 30-inch diameter pipeline. 
 
WW27 (Watson Road and Roeser Road) – This project consists of replacing approximately 
1,550 feet of 15-inch diameter pipeline along Watson Road from Mobile Lane to Bowker Street—the 
existing pipeline surcharges under 2030 peak flow. To provide adequate capacity, the pipeline should 
be replaced with a 30-inch diameter pipeline. 
 
WW28 (SR 85 and Apache Road) – This project consists of replacing approximately 364 feet of 
24-inch diameter pipeline along SR 85 from Apache Road to Narramore Avenue. The existing pipeline 
surcharges under buildout peak flows. To provide adequate capacity, the pipeline should be replaced 
with a 36-inch diameter pipeline. 
 
WW29 (Irwin Avenue and 4th Street) – This project consists of replacing approximately 933 feet of 
30-inch diameter pipeline along Irwin Avenue from 4th Street to 6th Street. The existing pipeline 
surcharges under buildout peak flow. To provide adequate capacity, the pipeline should be replaced 
with a 42-inch diameter pipeline. This pipeline capacity limitation is significant because future 
development west of SR 85 will need to pass through this pipeline. 
Future Pipeline Capacity Evaluation 
A capacity analysis of the planned future collection system (2030, 2035, and 2040) was performed by 
applying the planned future wastewater flows in the model to the existing and planned future pipes 
anticipated in each future planning period. The purpose of this evaluation is to verify that planned future 
pipes are adequately sized and to determine if currently installed pipes are adequate to convey future 
flows through 2040. 
The following sections summarize the proposed improvements to existing sewer mains that will serve 
future users. The capacity deficiencies to the existing pipelines are shown in Figure 5.19. 
Model results for buildout flows with future infrastructure are shown in Appendix Figure 5A.4. Future 
pipelines were placed in the mile streets in the model to represent growth in undeveloped areas. The 
actual pipe layout may differ.

10
assayampa
River
Dixie
Hassayampa
on
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Skyline
Regional Park
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
10
Litchfield Park
McMicken
Avondale
Goodyear
Gila River
Estrella
Mountain Park
Phoenix/Goodyear
Airport
Liberty
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Camelback Rd
Bethany
Home Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
Perryville Rd
Central WRF
Sundance WRF
24"
10"
30"
8"
12"
15"
10"
12"
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
1.5
0.75
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.19  Central Buckeye Existing Pipeline Deficiencies
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Gravity Main
Force Main
"
=)
Lift Station
Gravity Sewer Main
Deficiency

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-42 
2030 Improvements 
The 2030 deficiencies are shown in red in Figure 5.20 and summarized below. 
 
WW30 (Centre Avenue and 7th Street) – This project consists of replacing approximately 3,240 feet 
of 10-inch diameter pipeline along Centre Avenue from 7th Street to 10th Lane—the existing pipeline 
surcharges under 2030 peak flow. To provide adequate capacity, the pipeline should be replaced with 
a 15-inch diameter pipeline. 
 
WW31 (Lower Buckeye Road and Apache Road) – This project consists of replacing approximately 
6,316 feet of 12-inch diameter pipeline 1,900 feet north of Lower Buckeye Road from Apache Road to 
Watson Road—the existing pipeline surcharges under 2030 peak flow. To provide adequate capacity, 
the pipeline should be replaced with a 15-inch diameter pipeline. 
2035 Improvements 
The 2035 deficiencies are shown in Figure 5.20 in red and are summarized below. 
 
WW32 (Yuma Road and 241st Lane) – This project consists of replacing approximately 743 feet of 
10-inch diameter pipeline along Yuma Road from 241st Lane to 241st Avenue—the existing pipeline 
surcharges under 2035 peak flow. To provide adequate capacity, the pipeline should be replaced with 
a 15-inch diameter pipeline. 
 
WW33 (239th Drive and Zak Road) – This project consists of replacing approximately 1,282 feet of 
8-inch diameter pipeline along 239th Drive from Zak Road to 240th Avenue—the existing pipeline 
surcharges under 2035 peak flow. To provide adequate capacity, the pipeline should be replaced with 
a 15-inch diameter pipeline. 
2040 Improvements 
The 2040 deficiencies are shown in Figure 5.20 in red and are summarized below. 
 
WW34 (Apache Road and Southern Avenue) – This project consists of replacing 1,566 feet of 
12-inch diameter pipeline along Apache Road from Southern Avenue to Alta Vista Road—the existing 
pipeline surcharges under the 2040 peak flow. To provide adequate capacity, the pipeline should be 
replaced with a 15-inch diameter pipeline. 
5.5.4.7 
Lift Station Capacity Evaluation 
The peak hour inflow for each planning period was compared to the existing lift station firm capacity. 
Table 5.15 summarizes the lift station capacity analysis and includes the existing firm capacity as well as 
the peak dry weather inflow and capacity surplus or deficit for each planning period. 
The Industrial Park Lift Station was designed to pump flow for the existing Industrial Park development 
west of SR 85. It will only need an expansion if the City plans to connect future developments north of the 
lift station. Otherwise, the City can construct a new lift station close to Industrial Park Lift Station and 
pump flows to the Central WRF in the interim before WRF 3 is constructed. 
The Blue Horizon Lift Station was designed to pump flow from northeast Sundance service basin to the 
Sundance WRF. The lift station's service area is planned to continue expanding through the 2040 planning 
period. The City may choose to phase out the Blue Horizon Lift Station for a gravity main along the north side 
of the RID Canal to the Sundance WRF. A hydraulic evaluation would be needed to size the gravity main.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-43 
Table 5.15 
Central Buckeye Lift Station Capacity Evaluation 
Lift 
Station 
ID 
Lift Station 
Name(1) 
Planning 
Period 
Number of 
Pumps 
Firm 
Capacity 
(gpm) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Peak Hour 
Inflow 
(gpm) 
Surplus/ 
Deficit 
(gpm) 
Peak Hour 
Inflow 
(gpm) 
Surplus/ 
Deficit 
(gpm) 
Peak Hour 
Inflow 
(gpm) 
Surplus/ 
Deficit 
(gpm) 
Peak Hour 
Inflow 
(gpm) 
Surplus/ 
Deficit 
(gpm) 
W-3 
Buckeye 
Industrial Park 
Existing 
2 
517 
216 
301 
227 
290 
239 
278 
261 
256 
W-1 
Shadow Canyon Existing 
2 
30 
24 
6 
24 
6 
24 
6 
24 
6 
W-2 
Blue Horizon(2) 
Existing 
2 
4,252 
2,337 
1,915 
3,171 
1,081 
3,327 
925 
3,504 
748 
W-25 
Turner LS 
2035 
2 
694 
 
 
 
 
129 
565 
259 
435 
W-17 
Cipriani 
2035 
5 
3,500 
 
 
 
 
3,045 
455 
3,193 
307 
W-20 
Lower Buckeye 
Road LS 
2030 
2 
100 
 
 
16 
84 
36 
64 
99 
1 
W-23 
Rainbow Road LS 2035 
2 
200 
 
 
 
 
34 
166 
95 
105 
W-11 
Hazen Road LS 
2035 
2 
694 
 
 
 
 
55 
639 
248 
446 
W-14 
Dean Road LS 
2035 
4 
1,400 
 
 
 
 
775 
625 
1,080 
320 
W-24 
Palo Verde LS 
2035 
4 
1,400 
 
 
 
 
221 
1,179 
977 
423 
W-26 
Johnson LS 
2030 
5 
3,500 
 
 
1,683 
1,817 
2,249 
1,251 
2,958 
542 
W-28 
Pacific Railroad 
LS 
2035 
2 
694 
 
 
 
 
50 
644 
220 
474 
W-29(3) 
Turner and Union 
Pacific LS 
2030 
2 
694 
 
 
508 
186 
 
 
 
 
Notes: 
(1) The Broadway Lift Station was not modeled or analyzed for capacity improvements. Flows into the lift station are not expected to increase because the area it serves is fully 
developed.  
(2) Capacity of lift station to be confirmed. 
(3) W-29 lift station is used to pump flow from east of SR 85 to West of SR 85 to the Central WRF Basin. The lift station will be used until WRF 3 is constructed.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-44 
5.5.4.8 
Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation 
The Central treatment facilities were evaluated against the projected wastewater flows to determine the 
need and timing for future WWTP expansions. The City's WRF capacity is calculated in terms of ADMM 
flows. The ADMM flows are assumed to be 17 percent more than the average daily flows. Table 5.16 
shows the current and projected wastewater flows relative to the buildout flow requirements for each 
WRF. 
The capacity of Central WRF assumes the facility utilizes existing technologies for treatment. However, the 
City has plans to upgrade treatment to MBR which would raise the total available capacity of the 
treatment plant and potentially delay expansion triggers. 
Table 5.16 
Central Buckeye WRFs ADMM Flow Projections 
WRF Basin  
Average Daily Flow of the Maximum Month (mgd) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Buildout 
Central(1) 
2.6 
4.7 
5.3 
5.6 
13.5 
Sundance 
2.1 
4.0 
4.1 
4.1 
4.7 
WRF 3 
0 
1.1 
1.7 
2.5 
13.8 
Grand View WRF 
0 
0 
0.1 
0.5 
6.1 
Notes: 
(1) Central WRF Basin buildout flow includes flows from Beloat Road to Baseline Road in the south area of Basin 4. 
The treatment facility capacity analysis has been calculated for Option 1 and Option 2 East, and Option 1 
and Option 2 West.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-45 
East of MC SR 85 
Option 1 East is for future flows from Basins 1 and 4 to go to the Central WRF. The existing capacity of the 
Central WRF is 4.5 mgd. As shown in Figure 5.20, the projected ADMM flow surpasses the 80 percent 
trigger expansion in 2027, so an expansion to 6 mgd is recommended before 2030. Another expansion to 
8 mgd is recommended by 2037. The ADMM flow drops in 2035 to account for a future WRF in Basin 3 
that will treat the wastewater west of SR 85. Before 2035, some of the wastewater in Basin 3 will be 
pumped to the Central WRF. The projected buildout capacity requirement for the Central WRF is 20 mgd. 
 
Figure 5.20 Central Buckeye Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 (Option 1 East) 
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
Flow
(mgd)
Date
Average Day
Max Month
Capacity
80% Capacity

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-46 
Option 2 East will have a future Grand View WRF (formerly WRF 6) along Southern Avenue and Dean Road 
that serves Basin 4. As shown in Figure 5.21, the projected ADMM flow does not vary significantly from 
Option 1 East, and both options will have the same recommended expansion timing. The expansion 
timings for Central WRF are primarily controlled by the new developments in Basin 1. The developments 
in Basin 4 are projected to start developing in 2030 and not expected to be completed until after 2040. 
Actual development times may vary. The buildout flows from these developments in Basin 4 are not 
shown in this 20-year capacity evaluation timeframe. The buildout ADMM flow for Option 2 East is 
14 mgd. 
 
Figure 5.21 Central Buckeye Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 (Option 2 East) 
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
Flow
(mgd)
Date
Average Day
Max Month
Capacity
80% Capacity

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-47 
As shown in Figure 5.22, the recommended initial capacity of Grand View WRF is 0.6 mgd, and it will not 
need an additional expansion before 2040. 
 
Figure 5.22 Grand View WRF Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 (Option 2 East) 
As shown in Figure 5.23, a Sundance WRF expansion is recommended in 2029 from 3.6 mgd to 6.0 mgd. 
 
Figure 5.23 Sundance WRF Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
Flow
(mgd)
Date
Average Day
Max Month
80% Capacity
Capacity
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
Flow
(mgd)
Date
Average Day
Max Month
80% Capacity
Capacity

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-48 
West of MC SR 85 
The future flows from Basin 3 initially go to the Central WRF. Once the flows are great enough, WRF 3 is 
constructed and flows from the Cipriani area and the mile west of SR 85 go to WRF 3 instead of the 
Central WRF. As shown in Figure 5.24, the WRF 3 initial capacity is 2 mgd. An expansion is expected to 
trigger when the ADMM flow surpasses the 80 percent trigger expansion in 2034, so an expansion to 
4 mgd is recommended before 2035. 
  
Figure 5.24 WRF 3 Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
2025
2030
2035
2040
Flow
(mgd)
Date
Average Day
Max Day
Capacity
80% Capacity

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-49 
As shown in Figure 5.25, the initial proposed capacity for the Cipriani package plant is 1 mgd. The 
80 percent capacity trigger is projected to occur in 2031, so the package plant will be phased out for a lift 
station to WRF 3 by the 2035 planning period. 
 
Figure 5.25 Cipriani Package Plant Wastewater Treatment Capacity Evaluation through 2040  
5.5.4.9 
Infrastructure Projects 
Based on the collection system evaluation and improvement projects identified in Section 5.5.4, the 
following projects have been identified and are described below. 
Table 5.17 is organized by option in Central Buckeye. Figure 5.26 shows the projects in Table 5.17 that are 
associated with Option 1 East and Option 1 West. 
The Trigger column in Table 5.17 identifies when a project needs to be in service. Projects to address 
known deficiencies are assigned the 2030 planning year so that the projects are completed in the next 
5 years. Other projects need to be constructed in time to make sure that the performance criteria can be 
met. Project timing is crucial. For instance, WRF expansion is triggered when flow reaches 80 percent of 
capacity. Similarly, infrastructure projects serving new developments must coincide with construction 
timelines. For these, the development's anticipated planning year acts as the trigger. The City maintains 
flexibility to adjust project start dates based on evolving conditions, ensuring timely completion. 
 
 
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
Flow
(mgd)
Date
Average Day
Max Month
80% Capacity
Capacity

10
Hassayampa
River
Dixie
Hassayampa
Arlington
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Skyline
Regional Park
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
10
McMicken
Gila River
P
Liberty
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
"
=)
WWPP
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Camelback Rd
Bethany Home Rd
Perryville Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
4
3
2
1
WW35
WW53
WW54
WW28
WW75
WW70
WW89
WW32
WW94
WW93
WW123
WW68
WW29
WW40
WW33
WW107
WW37 WW39
WW122
WW50
WW109
WW27
WW34
WW38
WW49
WW63
WW51
WW84
WW125
WW114
WW95
WW41
WW128 WW129
WW46
WW124
WW103
WW69
WW82
WW79
WW99
WW97
WW87
WW86
WW83
WW30
WW126
WW127
WW71
WW43
WW101
WW115
WW117
WW47
WW120
WW81
WW48
WW42
WW80
WW67
WW106
WW105
WW62
WW108
WW52
WW111
WW119
WW26
WW76
WW102
WW96
WW100
WW121
WW58
WW64
WW110
WW56
WW44
WW66
WW31
WW113
WW61
WW72
WW118
WW112
WW55
WW60
WW116
WW77
WW74
WW36
WW78
WW104
WW88
WW73
WW85
WW57
WW65
WW45
WW59
WW91
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch03\
O
0
1.5
0.75
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5.26  Central Buckeye Recommended Infrastructure Improvements
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
FM
Proposed FM
"
=)
LS
"
=)
Proposed LS
WR F
WRF
WR F
Proposed WRF
WWPP Proposed Package
Plant
Gravity Sewer Main (inches)
≤8
10 - 12
15 - 18
21 - 36
42 - 66
Proposed Gravity Sewer Main
(inches)
15
18-21
24
30-36
42-48
60-66
Collection Basins
1
2
3
4
5
Projected Development Phase
2030
2035
2040
Existing
Post 2040

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-51 
Table 5.17 
Central Buckeye Wastewater Infrastructure Projects 
Project No. 
Option No. 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/ mgd) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
WW26 
Both 
Expand the 12-inch gravity sewer main to a 30-inch gravity sewer main along Watson Road from Lower 
Buckeye Road to Burton Avenue. 
Pipeline surcharges under 2030 peak dry weather flows. 
30 
1,600 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2030) 
WW27 
Both 
Expand the 15-inch gravity sewer main to a 30-inch gravity sewer main along Watson Road from Mobile 
Lane to Bowker Street. 
Pipeline surcharges under 2030 peak dry weather flows. 
30 
600 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2030) 
WW28 
Both 
Expand the 24-inch gravity sewer main to a 36-inch gravity sewer main along MC 85 from Apache Road to 
Narramore Avenue. 
Pipeline surcharges under 2030 peak dry weather flows. 
36 
300 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2030) 
WW29 
Both 
Expand the 30-inch gravity sewer main to a 42-inch gravity sewer main along Irwin Avenue from 4th Street 
to 6th Street. 
Pipeline surcharges under 2030 peak dry weather flows. 
42 
800 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2030) 
WW30 
Both 
Expand the 10-inch gravity sewer main to a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Centre Avenue from 10th 
Lane to 7th Street. 
Pipeline surcharging under 2030 peak dry weather flows. 
15 
1,000 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2030) 
WW31 
Both 
Expand the 12-inch gravity sewer main to a 15-inch gravity sewer main 1,900 feet north of Lower Buckeye 
Road from Apache Road to Watson Road. 
Pipeline surcharges under 2030 peak dry weather flows. 
15 
1,900 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2030) 
WW32 
Both 
Expand the 10-inch gravity sewer main to a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Yuma Road from 241st Lane 
to 241st Avenue. 
Pipeline surcharges under 2035 peak dry weather flows. 
15 
200 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2035) 
WW33 
Both 
Expand the 8-inch gravity sewer main to a 15-inch gravity sewer main along 239th Drive from Zac Road to 
240th Avenue. 
Pipeline surcharges under 2035 peak dry weather flows. 
15 
400 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2035) 
WW34 
Both 
Expand the 12-inch gravity sewer main to a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Apache Road from Southern 
Avenue to Alta Vista Road. 
Pipeline surcharges under 2040 peak dry weather flows. 
15 
500 
Pipeline Capacity Above 82%. 
(2040) 
WW35 
Both 
Construct a 2 mgd lift station in Basin 3 along Turner Road. 
Construct a future lift station to pump flow from future 
developments to Central WRF. 
2 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW36 
Both 
Construct an 8-inch force main along Baseline Road from Turner Road to 263rd Avenue. 
Connect the future lift station along Turner Road to the 
existing collection system in Basin 1. 
8 
7,924 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW37 
Both 
Expand Central WRF from 4.5 mgd to 6 mgd total capacity. 
Treat flow from future developments. 
1.5 
1 
Wastewater flow reaches 80% of capacity. 
(2030) 
WW38 
Both 
Expand Sundance WRF from 3.6 mgd to 6 mgd total capacity. 
Treat flow from future developments. 
2.4 
1 
Wastewater flow reaches 80% of capacity. 
(2029) 
WW39 
Both 
Expand Central WRF from 6 mgd to 8 mgd total capacity. 
Treat flow from future developments. 
2 
1 
Wastewater flow reaches 80% of capacity. 
(2037) 
WW40 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Watson Road from Yuma Road to Pima Street. 
Connect the commercial area along Watson Road and 
Acacia Crossing with Central WRF. 
18 
900 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW41 
Both 
Construct a 21-inch gravity sewer main along Watson Road from Durango Street to Magnolia Street. 
Connect the commercial area along Watson Road and 
Acacia Crossing with Central WRF. 
21 
1,800 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW42 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Southern Avenue from SR 85 to Rooks Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
4,400 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW43 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Southern Avenue from SR 85 to Turner Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
3,900 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW44 
Both 
Construct a 21-inch gravity sewer main along Turner Road from Southern Avenue to Union 
Pacific Railroad. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 21 
7,600 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW45 
Both 
Construct a 30-inch gravity sewer main along Johnson Road from Lower Buckeye Road to 
Southern Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 30 
12,700 
Development in the area. 
(2030)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-52 
Project No. 
Option No. 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/ mgd) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
WW46 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Lower Buckeye Road from 305th Avenue to Johnson Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
3,100 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW47 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Johnson Road from Interstate 10 to Maricopa Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
6,400 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW48 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Johnson Road from Maricopa Road to Durango Street. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
5,000 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW49 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Johnson Road from Durango Street to Watkins Street. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
1,700 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW50 
Both 
Construct a 24-inch gravity sewer main along Johnson Road from Watkins Street to Lower Buckeye Road. Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 24 
1,300 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW51 
Both 
Construct a 33-inch gravity sewer main along Lower Buckeye Road from 315th Avenue to 313th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 33 
1,500 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW52 
Both 
Construct a 4-inch force main along Lower Buckeye Road from 313th Avenue to Johnson Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 4 
4,700 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW53 
Both 
Construct 100 gpm LS on 313th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 100 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW54 
1 
Construct 1.0-mgd package plant on Southern Avenue and Johnson Road. 
Treat flow from future developments. 
2 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW55 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Turner Road from Interstate 10 to Lower Buckeye Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
7,800 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW56 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Turner Road from Lower Buckeye Road to 
Southern Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
5,700 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW57 
Both 
Construct a 21-inch gravity sewer main along Lower Buckeye Road from Broadway Road to Yuma Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 21 
12,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW58 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Wilson Avenue from McDowell Road to Van Buren Street. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
5,815 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW59 
Both 
Construct a 30-inch gravity sewer main along Palo Verde Road from Washington Street to the RID Canal. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 30 
17,300 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW60 
Both 
Construct a 24-inch gravity sewer main along Sun Valley Parkway from Van Buren Street to 
Washington Street and along Van Buren Street from Wilson Avenue to Van Buren Street. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 24 
7,700 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW61 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Van Buren Street from Turner Road to Wilson Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
6,400 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW62 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Turner Road from McDowell Road to Van Buren Street. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
5,300 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW63 
Both 
Construct a 33-inch gravity sewer main along Palo Verde Road from Jackson Avenue to Buckeye 
Canal Road and a 30-inch gravity main along Palo Verde Road from Maricopa Road to Jackson Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 33 
1,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW64 
Both 
Construct a 24-inch gravity sewer main along Wilson Road from Alta Vista Road to Monroe Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 24 
5,800 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW65 
Both 
Construct a 36-inch gravity sewer main along Bruner Road from Southern Avenue to Lower River Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 36 
12,400 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW66 
Both 
Construct a 42-inch gravity sewer main along Lower River Road from Bruner Road to Palo Verde Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 42 
7,700 
Development in the area. 
(2035)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-53 
Project No. 
Option No. 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/ mgd) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
WW67 
Both 
Construct a 60-inch gravity sewer main to WRF 3 along Palo Verde Road from Hazen Road to 
287th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 60 
7,700 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW68 
Both 
Construct a 24-inch gravity sewer main along Elwood Street from 311th Avenue to Johnson Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 24 
3,200 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW69 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Broadway Road from 303rd Avenue to Johnson Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
3,000 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW70 
1 
Construct 5 mgd LS on Southern Avenue and Johnson Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 5 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW71 
Both 
Construct 2 mgd LS on Palo Verde Road and the RID Canal. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 2 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW72 
1 
Construct a 18-inch pressurized pipeline along Southern Avenue from Johnson Road to Bruner Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
6,300 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW73 
Both 
Construct a 12-inch pressurized pipeline along Palo Verde Road from The RID Canal to Maricopa Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 12 
11,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW74 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Turner Road from Buckeye Canal Road to Hazen Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
5,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW75 
Both 
Construct 1 mgd LS on the intersection of Hazen Road and Turner Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 1 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW76 
Both 
Construct an 8-inch pressurized main along Hazen Road from Turner Road to Wilson Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 8 
7,000 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW77 
Both 
Construct a 33-inch gravity sewer main along Union Pacific Railroad from Turner Road to 279th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 33 
3,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW78 
Both 
Construct a 36-inch gravity sewer main along 279th Avenue from Union Pacific Railroad to Monroe Avenue 
and along Monroe Avenue from 279th Avenue to WRF 3 on 287th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 36 
9,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW79 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Rainbow Road from Dunlap Road to Broadway Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
3,200 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW80 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Broadway Road from Rainbow Road to Watson Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
6,300 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW81 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Verado Way from Broadway Road to Roeser Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
3,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW82 
Both 
Construct a 30-inch gravity sewer main along Roeser Road from Tuthill Road to Verrado Way. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 30 
2,900 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW83 
Both 
Construct a 33-inch gravity sewer main along Roeser Road from Verrado Way to Airport Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 33 
3,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW84 
Both 
Construct a 36-inch gravity sewer main along Airport Road from Roeser Road to 225th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 36 
1,700 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW85 
Both 
Construct a 36-inch gravity sewer main along Sunland Avenue from Airport Avenue to Dean Road and 
along Dean Road to the future Pacific Railroad Lift Station. Construct a 36-inch gravity main along 
Dean Road from Buckeye Canal Road to Baseline Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 36 
11,000 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW86 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Verrado Way from Buckeye Canal Road to Maricopa Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
3,200 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW87 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Verrado Way from Maricopa Road to Baseline Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
3,200 
Development in the area. 
(2035)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-54 
Project No. 
Option No. 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/ mgd) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
WW88 
Both 
Construct a 30-inch gravity sewer main along Baseline Road from 207th Avenue to Dean Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 30 
10,000 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW89 
1 
Construct 2 mgd capacity LS on Baseline Road and Dean Road. 
Pump flow from future developments in Basin 4 to Basin 1. 2 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW90 
2 
Construct 1 mgd capacity LS on Baseline Road and Dean Road. 
Pump flow from future developments in Basin 4 to Basin 1. 1 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW91 
1 
Construct an 12-inch pressurized main along Dean Road from Baseline Road to Monroe Avenue and along 
Monroe Avenue from Dean Road to 10th Lane. 
Convey flow from future developments in Basin 4 to 
Basin 1. 
12 
22,600 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW92 
2 
Construct an 8-inch pressurized main along Dean Road from Baseline Road to Southern Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments in Basin 4 to 
Basin 1. 
8 
6,400 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW93 
Both 
Construct 2 mgd WRF 3 near the intersection of Palo Verde Road and Hazen Road. 
Treat flow from future developments in Basins 3. 
2 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW94 
Both 
Construct 200 gpm LS on Rainbow Road and Broadway Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 200 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW95 
Both 
Construct 4-inch force main along Broadway Road from Rainbow Road to 230th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 4 
1,900 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW96 
Both 
Construct 18-inch gravity sewer main along Southern Avenue from Rainbow Road to Dean Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
6,300 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW97 
Both 
Construct 15-inch gravity sewer main along Southern Avenue from 231st Avenue to Rainbow Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
3,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW98 
2 
Construct Grand View WRF with a capacity of 1 mgd. 
Treat flow from future developments in Basin 4. 
1 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW99 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Liberty School Road from Union Pacific Railroad to 
Southern Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
3,100 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW100 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Liberty School Road from Southern Avenue to 
Baseline Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
5,600 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW101 
Both 
Construct a 24-inch gravity sewer main along Baseline Road from 197th Avenue to 207th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 24 
3,500 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW102 
Both 
Construct a 21-inch gravity sewer main along Baseline Road from Jackrabbit Trail to 197th Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 21 
5,400 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW103 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Baseline Road from Perryville Road to Jackrabbit Trail. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
3,000 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW104 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along 191st Avenue from Buckeye Canal Road to Baseline Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
9,100 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW105 
Both 
Construct a 30-inch gravity sewer main along Broadway Road from Jackrabbit Trail to 199th Avenue and 
along 199th Avenue from Broadway Road to Chipman Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 30 
4,700 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW106 
Both 
Construct a 30-inch gravity sewer main along Chipman Road from 199th Avenue to Tuthill Road and along 
Tuthill Road from Chipman Road to Roeser Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 30 
4,500 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW107 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Jackrabbit Trail from Longview Avenue to Broadway Road. Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
1,300 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW108 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Jackrabbit Trail from Lower Buckeye Road to 
Longview Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
5,000 
Development in the area. 
(2040)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-55 
Project No. 
Option No. 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/ mgd) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
WW109 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Jackrabbit Trail from Watkins Street to Lower Buckeye Road. Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
1,600 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW110 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Yuma Road from Interstate 10 to Lower Buckeye Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
5,600 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW111 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Yuma Road from Lower Buckeye Road going south for half 
a mile. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
2,700 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW112 
Both 
Construct a 30-inch gravity sewer main along Palo Verde Road from Maricopa Road to Jackson Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 30 
7,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW113 
Both 
Construct a 24-inch gravity sewer main along Lower Buckeye Road from Yuma Road to Palo Verde Road. Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 24 
6,300 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW114 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Hazen Road from SR 85 to 271st Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
1,800 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW115 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Hazen Road from 271st Avenue to Turner Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
3,600 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW116 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Hazen Road from Palo Verde Road to Wilson Street. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
5,900 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW117 
Both 
Construct a 15-inch gravity sewer main along Wilson Street from Buckeye Canal Road to Hazen Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 15 
4,000 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW118 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Hazen Road from Wilson Street to Turner Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
6,500 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW119 
Both 
Construct a 27-inch gravity sewer main along Beloat Road from SR 85 to Rooks Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 27 
4,600 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW120 
Both 
Construct an 18-inch gravity sewer main along Hazen Road from SR 85 to 252nd Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
10,000 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW121 
Both 
Construct a 21-inch gravity sewer main along Hazen Road from 252nd Avenue to the Central WRF. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 21 
6,000 
Development in the area. 
(2040) 
WW122 
Both 
Expand the Central WRF total capacity from 6 mgd to 8 mgd. 
Treat flows from future developments to collection system. 
2 
1 
Wastewater flow reaches 80% of capacity. 
(2040) 
WW123 
Both 
Expand WRF 3 total capacity from 2 mgd to 4 mgd. 
Treat flows from future developments to collection system. 
2 
1 
Wastewater flow reaches 80% of capacity. 
(2034) 
WW124 
Both 
Construct 21-inch gravity sewer main along Roosevelt Canal from Turner Road to 271st Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 21 
3,100 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW125 
Both 
Construct 21-inch gravity sewer main along Roosevelt Canal from 271st Avenue to Broadway Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 21 
1,700 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW126 
Both 
Construct 2 mgd total capacity lift station on Union Pacific Railroad and Dean Road. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 2 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW127 
Both 
Construct an 8-inch pressurized main along Turner Road from the Roosevelt Canal to Wier Avenue and 
along Wier Avenue from Turner Road to 271st Avenue. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 8 
400 
Development in the area. 
(2035) 
WW128 
Both 
Construct 6 mgd firm capacity lift station on Johnson Road and the Roosevelt Canal. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 6 
1 
Development in the area. 
(2030) 
WW129 
Both 
Construct a 18-inch pressurized main along Johnson Road across the Roosevelt Canal. 
Convey flow from future developments to collection system. 18 
500 
Development in the area. 
(2035)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
5-56 
5.6 
Conclusion and Recommendations 
1. Most of the City's 2024 wastewater system has sufficient capacity to convey existing and future peak 
dry weather flows through 2040. However, there are a few pipelines in the Central WRF basin and Sun 
City Festival WRF basin that should be monitored to see if they should be upsized. 
2. The City should increase the firm capacity of the Shadow Canyon Lift Station in the 2030 planning 
period to provide enough capacity for peak dry weather flow. 
3. The City should increase the firm capacity of the Industrial Park Lift Station in the 2030 planning 
period to provide enough capacity for peak dry weather flow from the developments west of the 
SR 85. The City may also decide to construct an additional lift station instead of upsizing the Industrial 
Park Lift Station to pump flow from west of SR 85 to the Central WRF. 
4. The City should increase the Festival Ranch WRF from 1 mgd to 2 mgd in the 2030 planning period so 
the projected ADMM flows do not exceed 80 percent of the treatment plant capacity. 
5. The City should construct the Floreo WRF with a capacity of 0.3 mgd and expand it in the 2035 
planning period to 1.2 mgd capacity so the projected ADMM flows do not exceed 80 percent of the 
treatment plant capacity. 
6. The City should increase the Tartesso WRF from 1.2 mgd to 2.5 mgd in the 2035 planning period so 
the projected ADMM flows do not exceed 80 percent of the treatment plant capacity. 
7. The City should increase the Central WRF from 4.5 mgd to 6 mgd in the 2030 planning period and 
from 6 mgd to 8 mgd in the 2040 planning period so the projected ADMM flows do not exceed 
80 percent of the treatment plant capacity. 
8. The City should increase the Sundance WRF from 3.6 to 6 mgd in the 2040 planning period so the 
projected ADMM flow does not exceed the treatment plant capacity. 
9. The City should either construct WRF 3 and Grand View WRF in the 2035 planning period with an 
initial capacity of 2 mgd and 1 mgd, respectively, or only construct WRF 3 in the 2035 planning period 
with an initial capacity of 2 mgd while 2 lift stations in series pump flow from Basin 4 to the Central 
WRF.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-1 
CHAPTER 6 RECLAIMED WATER MASTER PLAN 
6.1 
Introduction 
Chapter 6 presents the reclaimed water infrastructure plan for the City as part of the 2025 IWMP. This 
chapter presents the reclaimed water infrastructure implementation of the reclaimed water resource 
strategies that are in Chapter 3 of the IWMP. The purpose of the reclaimed water Master Plan is to identify 
the infrastructure needs and timing required for the City to beneficially use reclaimed water as the City 
grows.  
The reclaimed water system will adapt over time as the City grows and is able to fund capital 
improvements that increase the utilization of reclaimed water and use the water for the highest and best 
use for the City's benefit. The path for obtaining full utilization of this reclaimed water source is presented 
in this chapter. 
The outline of this chapter is as follows: 
1. 2024 Reclaimed Infrastructure Overview – This section contains a summary of the overall reclaimed 
water system and the strategies that will be implemented in the plan. 
2. Reclaimed Water Strategies and Criteria – This section presents reclaimed water management 
strategies and documents the performance criteria used to evaluate reclaimed system infrastructure. 
3. Master Plan by Reclaimed Service Area – This section presents the master plan, including 
infrastructure projects arranged by these reclaimed infrastructure systems: Sun City Festival, Floreo at 
Teravalis (Floreo), Tartesso, and Central Buckeye. Each reclaimed water system section contains the 
following subsections: 
a. Reclaimed Water Flows. 
b. Reclaimed Water Strategy. 
c. 
Infrastructure Projects. 
4. Conclusions and Recommendations – This section contains conclusions and recommendations of 
the study. 
6.2 
Reclaimed System Overview 
This IWMP study area covers those portions of the City that are north of the Gila River and that are not 
served by EPCOR. The master planning area covers approximately 432 square miles, although a portion of 
the land is mountainous and will not be developed. In Chapter 2 of the IWMP, the planning area was 
grouped into six different WPAs (formerly called DAWS planning areas) that were originally seen as areas 
that could possibly become a designation of ASW. These geographical areas are significant for the 
reclaimed system also because each area has one or more WRFs that produce reclaimed water that can be 
used as a water resource.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-2 
This IWMP covers growth through 2040, which growth will only use a portion of the land in each WPA. 
The land areas planned for growth include developments that have a CAWS and land zoned industrial or 
commercial that may not need a CAWS if land parcels are not subdivided into more than six parcels. The 
land parcels are grouped by the planning periods within which the land is expected to develop: 2030, 
2035, and 2040. Therefore, the infrastructure planned in this master plan focuses on the land areas 
planned to develop by 2040. 
Figure 5.1 Chapter 5 presents the WPAs and the land areas that are planned to develop by 2040, colored 
by planning period. 
6.2.1 
Reclaimed Infrastructure Development Strategy 
Each WPA has unique water supplies and water supply strategies that influence the reclaimed water 
infrastructure that is being planned in each WPA. This section provides background information, and a 
more detailed evaluation of each area is presented in Section 4.4. 
6.2.1.1 
WPA 1 
WPA 1 currently includes two developments that each have a separate WRF: the Sun City Festival 
development and the Floreo development. Sun City Festival is approximately half-developed and is 
expected to fully develop by 2040. The Sun City Festival WRF is planned to serve only the Sun City Festival 
development. Floreo is in the early phases of construction. Both developments have a WRF serving the 
development. In this IWMP, the future Floreo WRF is also planned to serve the Sun Valley Villages I and II 
development in between the Sun City Festival and Floreo development. Additional changes within the 
Floreo development would be needed for the Floreo WRF to serve the Sun Valley Villages. North of the 
CAP canal, a portion of the Sun City Festival, and the North Star Ranch developments will be served by a 
separate WRF north of the canal. The Teravalis development located west of the Hassayampa Wash is 
expected to deliver wastewater to a future Teravalis WRF. 
The reclaimed water strategy for WPA 1 is to first use reclaimed water for golf course or other irrigation 
from each WRF and then recharge the reclaimed water in a USF to obtain LTSC that can be recovered 
through potable water recovery wells. The Sun City Festival USF is being constructed, and the Floreo USF 
will be constructed when flows are high enough to justify a USF. 
6.2.1.2 
WPA 2 
The Tartesso WRF is planned to be a regional facility that will serve the developments in WPA 2. The 
gravity sewer delivering wastewater to the Tartesso WRF is 60 inches in diameter, so it was designed to 
convey wastewater flows from a large area. 
The Tartesso USF is permitted to recharge 20,000 AFY of reclaimed water, but the City does not own 
enough land at the current site to expand the Tartesso WRF to serve planned development in WPA 2, so 
additional land will need to be acquired to expand or relocate the WRF. Additional land areas for aquifer 
recharge should be located close to potable wells to maximize the groundwater credits that can be 
recovered from recharged reclaimed water.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-3 
6.2.1.3 
WPA 3, 4A, and 4B 
Central Buckeye currently has two WRFs: Central WRF and Sundance WRF. The Sundance WRF serves the 
WPA 3 north of the RID Canal and west of Perryville Road. The Central WRF is currently planned to serve 
the rest of Central Buckeye east of SR 85. One option is that a new WRF 4 (formerly WRF 6) could be 
constructed to serve land areas east of Rainbow Road. A 208 Amendment is being prepared for the Grand 
View WRF (WRF 4). 
Reclaimed water from both WRFs is delivered for irrigation and to the RID canal, which is a GSF so the City 
can obtain LTSCs. However, the Central WRF does not have the pumping and transmission capacity to 
deliver all the reclaimed water generated at the WRF to the RID canal, so reclaimed water that cannot be 
pumped to the RID canal is delivered to the Arlington Canal and the City does not obtain any benefit from 
this reclaimed water. 
An additional WRF is planned to serve land west of SR 85. This WRF is referred to as WRF 3 (formerly 
WRF 5). Cipriani is a future major development on the west side of Central Buckeye that is some distance 
from other developments. The plan for Cipriani is to have a package wastewater plant serve the Cipriani 
development until infrastructure is in place to connect the Cipriani development to WRF 3 after WRF 3 is 
constructed. 
6.2.1.4 
WPA 5 
Much of WPA 5 is within EPCOR's Certificate of Convenience and Necessity area, except for a 1-mile strip 
of land, on Jackrabbit Trail, going north to Bethany Home Road. This strip of land is served by the 
Sundance WRF, except for lands that are served by septic systems. Reclaimed water from WPA 5 is part of 
the reclaimed water from the Sundance WRF that is delivered to the RID canal and for irrigation. A 
significant portion of this area is served by septic systems. 
6.3 
Reclaimed Water Infrastructure Overview 
6.3.1 
Reclaimed Water Management Strategies 
The objective of the reclaimed water systems and reclaimed water management is to accomplish the 
following: 
 
Maximize the value of reclaimed water as a water resource, whether for LTSC or direct use. 
 
Find the highest and best use for the reclaimed water. 
 
Implement reclaimed water utilization alternatives that provide the best value. 
The following reclaimed water management strategies are or could be used in Buckeye: 
1. Irrigation – Reclaimed water used for irrigation is a viable reclaimed water management strategy 
when reclaimed water use decreases potable water use that would otherwise be used for irrigation. 
Using reclaimed water for irrigation also requires an aquifer storage facility to take the water when 
not needed for irrigation. 
2. GSF – The City is currently benefitting from an exchange agreement with the RID that operates the 
RID Canal. Reclaimed water is delivered to the canal, which enables the canal to reduce groundwater 
pumping by an equivalent amount and the City obtains LTSCs for reclaimed water delivered to the canal.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-4 
3. Constructed Recharge Facilities – Spreading basins are constructed recharge facilities consisting of 
engineered basins that have been excavated, shored, and planned in a way for operators to control 
flow to one or more basins. Water can be delivered to basins that go through wet and dry cycles to 
dry out the basin and perform the maintenance required to maintain percolation rates. The long-term 
feasibility of surface recharge is largely determined by hydrogeologic conditions and the ability of the 
soil to continuously percolate water with proper management. Site-specific recharge rates need to be 
developed using specific hydrogeologic studies and soil testing. 
4. ASR Wells – ASR wells are similar to a water production well with depths between 500 and 2,500 feet 
below land surface. Water recharge through an ASR well enters the aquifer and can be recovered later 
through the same well as a water source. The ASR well requires periodic bidirectional flow cycling to 
remove clogging and maintain the well recharge capacity. 
6.3.2 
Reclaimed Water System Performance Criteria 
The City's reclaimed water system infrastructure recommended in the 2025 IWMP is sized to provide 
acceptable levels of performance and reliability. 
Performance criteria focus primarily on sizing the reclaimed water infrastructure to provide sufficient 
capacity and reliability to take reclaimed water from the WRFs and deliver it to customers or to USF sites. 
Future pipelines are sized for flows up to the 2040 planning period. Reclaimed water infrastructure should 
satisfy the following criteria: 
1. Reclaimed Water Production – Reclaimed water flows are assumed to be 92 percent of the 
wastewater flow into a WRF unless stated otherwise for a specific WRF. 
2. Pump Stations – Pump stations are designed so that the firm capacity of the pump station will 
provide the required capacity. 
3. Recharge Basins – USFs need to be capable of recharging water produced by the WRFs for time 
periods up to a month when winter storms eliminate the need for outdoor irrigation. The total 
recharge capacity should be 50 percent greater than the highest reclaimed water flow so that some 
recharge basins can be taken out of service for maintenance and drying periods to maintain the 
recharge capacity of the basin. 
Where possible, USFs could be located in the area of influence of potable water production wells to 
maximize the recharge credits that can be obtained from aquifer recharge. However, poor-quality 
reclaimed water can adversely affect the quality of potable water from nearby wells so locating 
recharge facilities farther from potable wells may be preferable in some situations. Therefore, the 
aquifer recharge strategy should be coordinated with the well pumping and treatment strategy. 
4. ASR Wells – ASR wells should have a capacity that is 20 percent higher than the required maximum 
recharge flow rate or have on extra ASR well, whichever is greater, for mechanical redundancy and for 
well redevelopment. 
5. Distribution Pipe Velocity – Pipe velocities should not exceed 7 fps when delivering peak flows.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-5 
6.4 
Master Plan by Reclaimed Service Area 
The Buckeye wastewater collection system has five separate WRF basins that do not fully align with WPAs. 
In this section, a separate plan is provided for each service area. 
6.4.1 
Sun City Festival 
6.4.1.1 
2024 Reclaimed Water System 
The Festival Ranch WRF is located along 287th Avenue and south of Sun Valley Parkway in WPA 1. It has 
a current capacity of 1 mgd with two planned expansions to bring the total capacity of the facility to 
1.5 mgd in 2030 and 2 mgd in 2038. 
Reclaimed water from Festival Ranch WRF is pumped into a transmission main system that transports the 
reclaimed water to the Sun City Festival development and golf course. The Sun City Festival development 
is entitled to up to 900 AFY, although actual reclaimed water use to date has been less. The City is entitled 
to the remaining reclaimed water. A USF is currently being constructed in the Sun City development along 
Beardsley Parkway and Desert Oasis Boulevard that will be ready for service in the third quarter of 2025. 
The permitted capacity of the USF is 3,700 AFY. Previously, CAP water was used to supplement reclaimed 
water flows to irrigate the golf course. With the USF and increasing reclaimed water flows, the USF 
provides the ability to obtain LTSCs that can be used to recover water for potable use in addition to using 
reclaimed water for irrigation. The City can also recharge CAP water in the facility. 
The reclaimed water transmission system consists of approximately 3.7 miles of reclaimed water mains 
ranging in size from 2 to 18 inches in diameter. A summary of the City's reclaimed water mains is shown in 
Table 6.1. The existing reclaimed water mains are shown in Figure 6.1. 
Table 6.1 
Sun City Festival Reclaimed Water Pipeline Summary 
Diameter (inches) 
Length (feet) 
2 
150 
12 
17,630 
16 
1,550 
18 
190 
Total 
19,520

N 291st Ave
e
Sun Valley Pkwy
W
Yukon D
r
Deser
t O
as
is B
lvd
W Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
N 251st Ave
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
D
r
W M
cRae D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W Beardsley Pkwy
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
WR F
Festival WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch06\
O
0
0.35
0.17
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 6.1  Sun City Festival 2024 Reclaimed Water System
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Reclaimed Water Main (inches)
2
12
16
18

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-7 
6.4.1.2 
Reclaimed Water Flows 
Sun City Festival WRF produced approximately 650 AF of reclaimed water in 2023. Table 6.2 summarizes 
the historical annual reclaimed water volume produced by the Sun City Festival WRF from 2018 through 
2022. The reclaimed water produced was mostly used for turf irrigation or discharged with no storage 
credit. No information on reclaimed water allocation was available for 2023. 
Table 6.2 
Sun City Festival Historical Reclaimed Water Produced 
Reclaimed Water Use 
Historical Annual Volume (AF) 
2018 
2019 
2020 
2021 
2022 
Turf Irrigation 
214 
172 
277 
294 
251 
Discharged without Benefit 96 
156 
133 
140 
264 
Total 
310 
328 
410 
434 
515 
Reclaimed water production estimates are based on the City's historical wastewater flow records. 
Reclaimed water flow projections for Sun City Festival are summarized in Table 6.3. These flows are used 
to plan the reclaimed water that can be beneficially used and to size infrastructure. The Sun City Festival 
reclaimed water projections are based on the phasing of future developments over a 15-year period 
(2030, 2035, 2040). 
Table 6.3 
Sun City Festival Projected Reclaimed Water Flow 
 
Flow (gpm/AFY) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Average Flow 
570/920 
790/1,270 
810/1,310 
870/1,400 
Maximum Month Average Daily Flow 
670/1,080 
920/1,480 
950/1,500 
1,020/1,650 
6.4.1.3 
Reclaimed Water Strategy 
The purpose of the USF being constructed in Sun City Festival development is to obtain LTSCs from 
reclaimed water production. The USF can also be used to recharge CAP water from the City's CAP 
allocation, the City's NIA water allocation, Harquahala groundwater, or other supplies the City might 
acquire and deliver to the USF. The USF spreading basins will be constructed as reclaimed water flows 
increase throughout the planning periods. Reclaimed water alone will not be sufficient to use the full 
permitted capacity by 2040. 
As shown in Figure 6.2, the USF would provide enough capacity through 2040. Table 6.4 presents the 
capacity requirements for different water types for each planning period. The capacity of the USF will need 
to be greater than the volume of the reclaimed and CAP water to be recharged. 
Recharge capacity for water that comes from the CAP canal may require additional capacity. The City also 
plans to have recharge capacity for NIA water at the recharge facility, so NIA water is included in the 
capacity requirements. Future water supply from the Harquahala Groundwater Basin may require 
additional recharge capacity at Sun City Festival.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-8 
Table 6.4 
Sun City Festival Projected Reclaimed Water Recharge Capacity Requirements 
WRF/Source 
Flow (gpm) 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Maximum Monthly Production 
920 
950 
1,020 
Winter Month Production(1) 
920 
940 
1,010 
CAP M&I(2) 
42 
42 
42 
CAP NIA(3) 
651 
651 
651 
Flow to Sun City Festival Development/Golf Course(4) 
(270) 
(300) 
(390) 
Required Recharge Capacity (gpm/AFY)(5) 
1,613/2,602 
1,633/2,2634 
1,703/2,747 
Notes: 
(1) Winter month is used for capacity requirements to see if there is enough capacity when irrigation is not needed. The winter 
month PF of 1.16 is based on the 2023 average monthly flow in the Sun City Festival WRF. 
(2) Assumed the City's CAP M&I total water supply allocation is 42 gpm. 
(3) Assumed the City's CAP NIA will only have 70 percent available of the total allocation of 2,786 AFY, as referenced in the 
2020 Buckeye Water Resource Master Plan and 900 AFY of the allocation is delivered to EPCOR. 
(4) Projected flow irrigation flow in future developments is based on irrigation growth rate in the last 5 years. 
(5) The required recharge capacity is based on the winter month production. 
 
Figure 6.2 
Sun City Festival Reclaimed Water Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
6.4.1.4 
Infrastructure Projects 
The USF is phased for the Sun City Festival reclaimed infrastructure projects through to the 2040 planning 
period. The USF is planned to start construction in 2025. It is assumed that the required infrastructure for 
the permitted design capacity of the USF is already funded. Table 6.5 summarizes the phasing of the USF. 
Figure 6.3 presents the Sun City Festival infrastructure with the USF footprint area that is expected to be 
needed for the buildout capacity of the system. The required capacity of the USF through 2040 is 
4,500 AFY, and at buildout is 6,000 AFY. The acreage of the USF at the required capacities translates to 
8.4 acres for 2040 and 11 acres for buildout.
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2023
2025
2027
2029
2031
2033
2035
2037
2039
Flow
(gpm)
Date
Total Storage Capacity
Total Reclaimed Flow

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-9 
Table 6.5 
Sun City Festival Reclaimed Infrastructure Projects 
Project 
Number 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/gpm/acre) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
RW1 
Construct the Sun City Festival USF with an initial 
capacity of 2,000 gpm. 
Fully use reclaimed water in 
Sun City Festival. 
2,000 
1 
End of 2025. 
RW2 
Construct a 6-mgd booster pump station and 
pipeline to the Sun City Festival USF. 
Deliver flow to the USF. 
4,200 
1 
End of 2025. 
RW3 
Construct a 16-inch pipeline from Festival Ranch 
WRF to the Sun City Festival USF. 
Deliver flow to the USF. 
16 
18,000 
End of 2025. 
RW4 
Construct a 16-inch pipeline from Beardsley 
Parkway and Wagner Complex Drive to the CAP 
canal along 275th Avenue.  
Deliver flow from the CAP 
canal. 
16 
1,700 
Water from the CAP canal 
needs to be recharged. 
(2030)

N 291st Ave
e
Sun Valley Pkwy
W
Yukon D
r
Deser
t O
as
is B
lvd
W Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
N 251st Ave
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
D
r
W M
cRae D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W Beardsley Pkwy
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
WR F
North Star
Ranch
Festival
Ranch
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
RW2
RW1
RW4
RW3
Festival WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch04\
O
0
0.35
0.17
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 6.3  Sun City Festival Recommended Reclaimed Water System Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
!ã
Well
!ã
Proposed Well
Future USF
Reclaimed Water Main (inches)
2
12
16
18
Proposed Reclaimed Water Main
(inches)
16
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-11 
6.4.2 
Floreo 
The Floreo development is planned to be served by a package wastewater plant before transitioning to a 
WRF around 2034. The actual timing may vary. The total capacity of the first phase of the WRF is planned 
to be 1.2 mgd. The facility will be located off Cactus Road and Sun Valley Parkway on the east side of the 
Hassayampa Wash. 
6.4.2.1 
Reclaimed Water Flows 
The reclaimed water flow projections for Floreo are summarized in Table 6.6. These flows are used to plan 
the reclaimed water that can be beneficially used and to size infrastructure. The Floreo flow projections 
are based on the phasing of future developments over a 15-year period (2030, 2035, 2040). A reclaimed 
water agreement with Teravalis was not available for the IWMP. 
Table 6.6 
Floreo Projected Reclaimed Water Production 
 
Flow (gpm/AFY) 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Average Annual Flow 
0 
110/180 
290/470 
Maximum Month Average Daily Flow 
0 
130/210 
340/550 
6.4.2.2 
Reclaimed Water Strategy 
The recommended strategy for the Floreo reclaimed system is to construct a USF to provide reclaimed 
storage capacity. If possible, the USF should be located within the area of influence of the Floreo potable 
wells. A groundwater study will be needed to determine if a USF is viable within the area of influence of 
the Floreo potable wells while also being close to the Wagner Wash which may have a good recharge 
rate. A recharge facility is not a part of the current Floreo plan, but a recharge facility will ultimately be 
needed for reclaimed water that is not used for irrigation. 
As shown in Figure 6.4, the recommended initial USF capacity is sufficient through 2040. Table 6.7 
presents the capacity requirements for the 2040 planning period. 
Table 6.7 
Floreo Projected Reclaimed Water Capacity Requirements 
WRF 
Flow (gpm) 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Maximum Monthly Production 
40 
130 
340 
Future USF Firm Capacity(1)(2) 
540 
540 
540 
Surplus (+)/Deficit (-) 
500 
410 
200 
Notes: 
(1) Recharge capacity assumes an infiltration rate of 1.2 feet per day. 
(2) Firm capacity is 50% of the total capacity.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-12 
  
Figure 6.4 
Floreo Reclaimed Water Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
6.4.2.3 
Infrastructure Projects 
The following infrastructure projects are recommended, as shown in Figure 6.5 and described in Table 6.8. 
The pipeline in the infrastructure projects is sized for 2040 reclaimed flows to the USF. Figure 6.3 presents 
the Floreo infrastructure with the USF footprint area that is expected to be needed for the buildout 
capacity of the system. The required capacity of the USF through 2040 is 540 AFY, and at buildout is 
18,200 AFY. The acreage of the USF at the required capacities translates to 1.5 acres for 2040 and 
41.5 acres for buildout. 
 
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2025
2027
2029
2031
2033
2035
2037
2039
Flow
(gpm)
Date
Total Storage Capacity
Total Reclaimed Flow

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-13 
Table 6.8 
Floreo Reclaimed Infrastructure Projects 
Project 
Number 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/gpm/acre) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
RW5 
Construct a 12-inch reclaimed water pipeline 
along Desert Oasis Boulevard to the future 
recharge basins. 
Deliver reclaimed water from the 
Floreo WRF to the recharge basins. 
12 
5,370 
Floreo WRF is constructed. 
(2030) 
RW6 
Construct recharge basins off Wagner Wash 
with a capacity of 540 gpm. 
Increase capacity of reclaimed water 
in Floreo. 
540 
1 
Floreo WRF is constructed. 
(2030) 
RW7 
Construct a 2-mgd pump station at Floreo WRF 
to pump reclaimed water into the recharge 
basins. 
Pump reclaimed water to the 
recharge basins. 
1,400 
1 
Floreo WRF is constructed. 
(2030)

W
C
act
u
s
Rd
W
C
a
c
t
u
s Rd
N
3
0
4
t
h
L
n
W
Indig
o
Way
S
W Teravalis Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
WR F
Floreo at
Teravalis
Teravalis
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
RW7
RW6
R
W5
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch06\
O
0
0.35
0.17
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 6.5  Floreo Recommended Reclaimed Water System Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
Proposed WRF
!ã
Proposed Well
Future USF
Proposed Reclaimed Water Main
(inches)
12
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-15 
6.4.3 
Tartesso 
The Tartesso WRF has a current capacity of 1.2 mgd, with one planned expansion to bring the total 
capacity of the facility to 2.5 mgd in 2030. The facility is located along West McDowell Road, 
approximately 1 mile south of the Tonopah Salome Highway in WPA 2. 
The reclaimed water produced by the Tartesso WRF is delivered to the Tartesso USF directly south of the 
WRF. The storage facility has a permitted capacity of 20,163 AFY, but the existing capacity of the facility is 
3,200 AFY. 
The Tartesso service area does not have any reclaimed pipelines because the reclaimed water is sent to 
the USF south from the WRF. A figure of the existing infrastructure is shown in Figure 6.6. 
6.4.3.1 
Reclaimed Water Flows 
Tartesso WRF produced approximately 795 AF of reclaimed water in 2023. Table 6.9 summarizes the 
historical average annual reclaimed water flow for Tartesso WRF from 2018 through 2022. No information 
on reclaimed water allocation was available for 2023. 
Table 6.9 
Tartesso Historical Annual Flow 
Reclaimed Water Use 
Historical Average Annual Volume (AF) 
2018 
2019 
2020 
2021 
2022 
Recharged at USF 
241 
294 
384 
533 
637 
Discharged without Benefit 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
Total 
241 
294 
384 
533 
637 
The reclaimed water flow projections for Tartesso are summarized in Table 6.10. These flows are used to 
plan the reclaimed water that can be beneficially used and to size infrastructure. The Tartesso flow 
projections are based on the phasing of future developments over a 15-year period (2030, 2035, 2040). 
Table 6.10 
Tartesso Projected Reclaimed Water Flow 
 
Flow (gpm/AFY) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Average Annual Flow 
440/710 
550/890 
710/1,150 
880/1,420 
Maximum Month Average Daily Flow 
520/840 
640/1,030 
840/1,350 
1,030/1,660

W Lynwood St
311th Ave
W
McDowell
Rd
N 311th A
WR F
Tartesso WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch04\
O
0
525
262.5
Feet
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN  
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 6.6  Tartesso 2024 Reclaimed Water System
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Existing USF

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-17 
6.4.3.2 
Reclaimed Water Strategy 
The tested infiltration rate of the Tartesso USF is 3.5 feet per day. The current strategy for the Tartesso 
reclaimed system is to increase the Tartesso recharge capacity up to the permitted capacity. The high 
recharge rate means the recharge basins in this area can provide more capacity per acre than the other 
USFs and is recommended over other reclaimed water management strategies. 
ADWR policy states that the area of impact for USF is either 1 mile or a distance determined by 
groundwater model analysis. The current location of the Tartesso USF is not within 1 mile of the existing 
Tartesso development and wells. The total area of the Tartesso WRF is limited so any additional USF 
constructed in the Tartesso service area should be in the Tartesso development within 1 mile of existing 
wells. 
The City is working to obtain an Alternative Designation of Assured Water Supply (ADAWS) for the 
Tartesso area which will require 25 percent of reclaimed water to be cut to the aquifer for recharge and 
another 25 percent of reclaimed water to be cut when the water is recovered at the Tartesso USF. As a 
result, 50 percent of reclaimed water sent to the Tartesso USF can be recovered for potable use. 
Obtaining an ADAWS may require pumping reclaimed water from Central Buckeye to the Tartesso USF. If 
the City moves in this direction, the size of the recharge facility may need to increase. 
As shown in Figure 6.7, the firm capacity of the USF is sufficient through 2039. Table 6.11 presents the 
capacity requirements for the 2040 planning period without considering an ADAWS in the Tartesso area. 
Table 6.11 
Tartesso Projected Reclaimed Water Capacity Requirements 
WRF 
Flow (gpm) 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Maximum Monthly Production 
640 
840 
1,030 
Existing Recharge Basin Firm Capacity(1) 1,010 
1,010 
1,010 
Future Recharge Basin Capacity 
 
 
1,000 
Surplus (+)/Deficit (-) 
370 
170 
980 
Notes: 
(1) Existing recharge basin capacity is 50% of the total capacity.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-18 
 
Figure 6.7 
Tartesso Reclaimed Water Capacity Evaluation through 2040 
6.4.3.3 
Infrastructure Projects 
The following infrastructure projects are recommended as shown in Figure 6.8 and described in 
Table 6.12. Figure 6.3 presents the Tartesso infrastructure with the USF footprint area that is expected to 
be needed for the buildout capacity of the system. The required capacity of the USF through 2040 is 
1,800 AFY, and at buildout is 37,800 AFY. The acreage of the USF at the required capacities translates to 
1.4 acres for 2040 and 30 acres for buildout.
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2038
2040
Flow
(gpm)
Date
Total Storage Capacity
Total Reclaimed Flow

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-19 
Table 6.12 
Tartesso Reclaimed Infrastructure Projects 
Project 
Number 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/gpm/acre) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
RW8 
Construct a 16-inch reclaimed water pipeline 
from Tartesso WRF north to Tonopah Salome 
Highway and along Thomas Road from Tonopah 
Salome Highway to Johnson Road. 
Connect future basin to 
Tartesso WRF. 
16 
9,000 
Tartesso maximum monthly reclaimed 
flow exceeds capacity. 
(2040) 
RW9 
Construct a 4-mgd pump station at Tartesso 
WRF to pump reclaimed water into the future 
recharge basin. 
Pump reclaimed water to 
the recharge basins. 
2,800 
1 
Tartesso maximum monthly reclaimed 
flow exceeds capacity. 
(2040) 
RW10 
Construct USF with a capacity of 1,000 gpm 
within the Tartesso wells area of influence. 
Pump reclaimed water to 
the recharge basins. 
1,000 
1 
Tartesso maximum monthly reclaimed 
flow exceeds capacity. 
(2040)

W Indian School Rd
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
Earll Dr
N 311th Ave
315th Ave
N 313th A
v
e
W Osborn Rd
Thomas
Rd
N Johnson Rd
W T
a
rt
ess
o
P
kw
y
N
Broo
kly
n
Dr
N
Br
ooklyn
D
r
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
W Thomas Rd
W Thomas Rd
Bruner Rd Bruner R
d
N 3
03rd
A
ve
Ta
rt
e
ss
o
Pk
w
y
T
arte
sso Pkwy
N Bruner Rd
Sun Valley
Pkwy
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
W Bellview St
W
McDowell
Rd
W McDowell Rd
Ave
W
N 299th Ave
W India
W Mc
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
WR F
Tartesso
Tartesso West
Elianto
RW10
RW9
RW8
Tartesso WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch06\
O
0
0.3
0.15
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 6.8  Tartesso Recommended Reclaimed Water System Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
!ã
Well
Existing USF
Future USF
Proposed Reclaimed Water Main
(inches)
16
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-21 
6.4.4 
Central 
Central Buckeye has two WRFs, the Central WRF and the Sundance WRF. 
The Central WRF has a current capacity of 4.5 mgd with two planned expansions to bring the total 
capacity of the facility to 6 mgd in 2028 and 8 mgd in 2037. The facility is located on 7th Street, south of 
Beloat Road in WPA 4B. The Central WRF pumps a limited amount of reclaimed water for irrigation and to 
the RID Canal for recharge. The current pump capacity of the Central WRF limits the amount of reclaimed 
water that can be sent to the RID Canal. Reclaimed water that is not used for irrigation or delivered to the 
RID Canal is delivered to the Arlington Canal, where the City does not receive LTSCs. The Central WRF has 
a pump station equipped with four pumps with a total capacity of 1,400 gpm. The pumps do not provide 
the head to deliver the design flow to the RID Canal and the pipe is undersized to deliver the full 
reclaimed water flow. The reclaimed water pump station does deliver water to the Earl Edgar Park, the 
Buckeye Elementary School, and a firefighting training facility. This reclaimed water delivery system is not 
planned for expansion, other than increasing the capacity to deliver reclaimed water to the RID canal. 
The Sundance WRF has a current capacity of 3.6 mgd with one planned expansion to bring the total 
capacity of the facility to 6 mgd. The facility is located north of RID Canal and east of Dean Road in 
WPA 4A. The Sundance WRF has two pump stations. The first pump station is equipped with two pumps 
for a total design capacity of 2,000 gpm which is used to irrigate the Sundance Golf Course and three 
schools. A second pump station with three pumps for a total design capacity of 7,500 gpm delivers 
reclaimed water to the RID Canal. The reclaimed water system is being expanded to include Sundance 
Park by running a main to the pond in the park where water is taken for irrigation. The Tract A well site is 
a former potable water site that is currently not in use. The Tract A site has a storage tank that can 
potentially be used on this reclaimed system to supply reclaimed water to a proposed ASR well at the 
same site. The storage tank can be filled with excess reclaimed water when the demand for irrigation is 
low. The site is a potential location for a future ASR well that can be used to recharge reclaimed water 
when irrigation demand is low. Other than Sundance Park, this reclaimed water system is not planned for 
further expansion. The Sundance WRF can provide enough reclaimed water for this reclaimed water 
distribution system. The Sundance WRF will be receiving some wastewater flows from EPCOR so the 
reclaimed water flows will be higher doe to this additional wastewater flow. 
The City has a long-term agreement with the RID to discharge up to 5,000 AFY of reclaimed water into the 
RID Canal. As the RID canal is a GSF, the City obtains LTSCs by delivering reclaimed water to the canal. 
This method is the least expensive way for the City to obtain LTSCs so as the City grows to deliver 
reclaimed water up to the agreed limit, the City should pursue increasing the limit if possible. 
The City will need additional capacity beyond the RID canal GSF to obtain reclaimed water LTSCs. 
Spreading basins are the next most economical way to obtain LTSCs but recharging reclaimed water to 
the aquifer is not allowed south of the RID canal because of the high water table. Spreading basins are 
also not allowed within 5 miles of the Buckeye municipal airport to avoid conflicts between waterfowl and 
airplanes. The remaining land area north of the RID canal and south of I-10 is likely planned for 
development. Therefore, ASR wells are planned for recharge.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-22 
ASR wells can be used to recover water from the aquifer that can be treated for potable use, and 
recovering water helps to maintain the aquifer recharge capacity. As a minimum, ASR wells need to be 
operated periodically to flush the aquifer and well packing to maintain the recharge capacity. Operation of 
the ASR wells needs to be coordinated with potable water recovery. The Central and Sundance WRF 
effluent has high TDS levels and the aquifer contains arsenic so treatment is likely required for 
groundwater recovered from ASR wells if this water is to be used for potable use. 
The reclaimed water transmission system consists of approximately 17.5 miles of reclaimed water mains 
ranging in size from 2 to 18 inches in diameter. The existing reclaimed water mains are summarized in 
Table 6.13. A figure of the existing infrastructure is shown in Figure 6.9. 
Table 6.13 
Central Buckeye Reclaimed Water Pipeline Summary 
Diameter (inches) 
Length (miles) 
Percentage 
Central WRF Basin 
 
 
6 
0.01 
0% 
8 
0.3 
4% 
12 
6.0 
87% 
21 
0.2 
3% 
Unknown 
0.4 
6% 
Total 
6.9 
 
Sundance WRF Basin 
 
 
6 
0.1 
1% 
8 
0.5 
5% 
10 
0.3 
3% 
12 
8.8 
83% 
Unknown 
0.9 
8% 
Total 
10.6

10
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
303
10
10
Gila R
Liberty
WR F
WR F
U
T
U
T
U
T
U
T
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
RID Canal
Buckeye Canal
Central WRF
Sundance WRF
Earl
Edgar
Park
Buckeye
Elementary
Sundance Park
Sundance Golf Course
Youngker
High School
Inca
Elementary
School
Sundance
Elementary
School
Tract A
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch06\
O
0
1
0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 6.9  Central Buckeye 2024 Reclaimed Water Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Reclaimed Water Users
U
T
Storage Tank
Canal
Reclaimed Water Main (inches)
6
8
10
12
20
21

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-24 
6.4.4.1 
Reclaimed Water Flows 
Central and Sundance WRFs produced approximately 4,960 AF of reclaimed water in 2023. Table 6.14 
summarizes the historical average annual reclaimed water flow for Central and Sundance WRFs from 2018 
through 2022. The reclaimed water produced was mostly sent to RID or Arlington Canals. No information 
on reclaimed water allocation was available for 2023. 
Table 6.14 
Central Buckeye Historical Annual Flow 
Reclaimed Water Use 
Historical Average Annual Volume (AF) 
2018 
2019 
2020 
2021 
2022 
Recharge to RID 
810 
1,398 
1,250 
1,300 
1,300 
Discharge to Buckeye Water 
Conservation and Drainage District 
Canal 
0 
0 
21 
31 
21 
Delivered to Arlington Canal 
1,764 
1,411 
1,687 
2,402 
2,563 
Sundance Golf Course 
494 
480 
537 
502 
502 
Schools 
0 
0 
0 
0 
188 
Earl Edgar Park 
60 
59 
61 
47 
50 
Total 
3,128 
3,348 
3,556 
4,282 
4,624 
Reclaimed water production is assumed to be 92 percent of wastewater flow for the Sundance and future 
WRF 3 and WRF 4. The reclaimed water to wastewater flow for the Central WRF is closer to 0.85. 
The reclaimed water flow projections analysis is split between East Central Buckeye and West Central 
Buckeye. East Central Buckeye is the service area east of SR 85 and consists of WRF Basins 1, 2, and 4. 
West Central Buckeye is the service area west of SR 85 and consists of WRF Basin 3. Figure 6.10 presents 
the future WRF basins in Central Buckeye. The flows for east and west Central Buckeye are summarized in 
Table 6.15. 
These flows are used to plan the reclaimed water that can be beneficially used and to size infrastructure. 
The flow projections are based on the phasing of future developments over a 15-year period (2030, 2035, 
2040). 
Table 6.15 
Central Buckeye Projected Reclaimed Water Flow 
Location 
 
Flow (gpm/AFY) 
2024 
2030 
2035 
2040 
East Central 
Buckeye 
Average Annual  
Flow 
3,430/5,530 
4,510/7,270 
4,940/7,970 
5,300/8,550 
Maximum Month 
Average Daily Flow 
4,010/6,470 
5,270/8,500 
5,770/9,310 
6,200/10,000 
West Central 
Buckeye 
Average Annual  
Flow 
0/0 
590 950 
910/1,470 
1,350/2,180 
Maximum Month 
Average Daily Flow 
0/0 
690/1,110 
1,060/1,710 
1,580/2,550

10
Hassayampa
River
Dixie
Hassayampa
Arlington
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Skyline
Regional Park
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
10
McMicken
Gila River
P
Liberty
WR F
WR F
WR F
WR F
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Camelback Rd
Bethany
Home Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo
Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
Perryville Rd
Central WRF
Sundance WRF
4
3
2
1
WRF 3
WRF 4/ Grand
View WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
1.5
0.75
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 6.10 Central Buckeye Planned Wastewater Collection Basins
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Collection Basins
1
2
3
4
WR F
 WRF
WR F
 Proposed WRF

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-26 
6.4.4.2 
Reclaimed Water Strategy 
East Central Buckeye 
The priority for reclaimed water in Central Buckeye is to deliver to the RID Canal for LTSCs followed by 
irrigation. Most of the Central WRF reclaimed water production will be pumped to the RID canal while 
most of the Sundance WRF reclaimed water production will be pumped to irrigation. If the reclaimed 
water from the WRFs exceeds the flow that can be delivered to the RID Canal, then ASR wells may need to 
be constructed. 
The RID Canal is permitted as a GSF, so the City receives LTSCs for reclaimed water delivered to the RID 
Canal. Central WRF sends most of its reclaimed water to the Arlington Canal, which does not provide 
LTSCs. Recommended improvements in Central Buckeye are to deliver reclaimed water to the RID Canal or 
ASR wells for recharge. Those improvements include increasing the capacity of the pump station at the 
Central WRF and increasing the capacity of the pipeline to the RID Canal. 
The Central WRF reclaimed water can be fully used by constructing a 24-inch diameter pipeline from the 
Central WRF along Beloat Road and along Dean Road to the Buckeye Canal where it would be connected 
to an existing 20-inch pipe going north to the RID canal. The Central WRF pump station would need to be 
replaced with a new pump station with a firm capacity of 4,800 gpm. 
The two existing irrigation pumps at the Sundance WRF do not provide sufficient head to deliver peak 
flows to irrigation, so both pumps in operation are necessary just to satisfy irrigation demands. The other 
pumps at the pump station are used to send reclaimed water to the RID Canal. A recommended 
improvement would be to replace the irrigation pumps at the Sundance WRF pump station with larger 
pumps that can deliver 1,500 gpm flows to irrigation with the firm pump station capacity. 
The City should construct ASR wells in Central Buckeye if the current exchange agreement with the RID 
Canal cannot be expanded. The City has expressed concerns about high TDS levels at the Central and 
Sundance WRFs, so treatment improvements should be implemented if ASR wells planned for potable 
use. Two options have been considered for ASR well locations. Option 1 East includes an ASR wellfield on 
Yuma Road and Verrado Way by the abandoned Goodyear Luke Auxiliary Satellite Airfield. Another ASR 
well can be constructed on the Tract A storage tank site. Option 2 East consists of an ASR wellfield farther 
west between Youngker High School and SR 85 along Lower Buckeye Road. 
The benefits of Option 1 East are that the infrastructure requirements are lower because less pipe is 
required and the ASR wells would be in proximity to the area of influence of the existing wells. 
Alternatively, if the high TDS levels of reclaimed water by the potable wells are problematic, Option 2 
would be preferable. 
Table 6.16 presents the existing reclaimed water capacity of East Central Buckeye and the required 
additional capacity needed by 2040. Figure 6.11 shows that the flow into the Arlington Canal should 
decrease in the next five years as it does not provide LTSC and be moved to the RID Canal until the 
5,000 AFY limit is reached. The ASR wells will provide additional capacity from 2030 through 2040.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-27 
Table 6.16 
East Central Buckeye Projected Reclaimed Water Flows 
Combined Central and Sundance WRF 
Reclaimed Water Deliveries 
Flow (gpm) 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Maximum Monthly Production 
5,270 
5,770 
6,200 
Winter Month Production(1) 
5,230 
5,720 
6,150 
Flow to RID Canal 
3,100 
3,100 
3,100 
Flow to Irrigation 
556 
556 
556 
Planned ASR Well Capacity(2) 
680 
2,730 
2,730 
Surplus (+)/Deficit (-)(3) 
(1,450) 
110 
(320) 
Notes: 
(1) Winter month is used for capacity requirements to see if there is enough capacity when irrigation is not needed. The winter 
month PF of 1.10 is based on the 2023 average monthly flow in Central WRF. 
(2) The capacity of an individual ASR well is assumed to be 1 mgd (1,100 AFY). 
(3) The surplus/deficit value is based on the winter month production. A capacity deficit will be offset by delivering reclaimed 
water to the Arlington Canal for no LTSC. 
 
Figure 6.11 East Central Buckeye Reclaimed Water Recharge Facility Capacity through 2040 
West Central Buckeye 
Two options were evaluated for future reclaimed water infrastructure West of SR 85 for reclaimed water 
coming from the Cipriani wastewater package plant and the future WRF 3. Option 1 West consists of ASR 
wells for reclaimed water recharge. The ASR wells would be located either along Johnson Road in the 
Cipriani Development or be located east of Buckeye Municipal Airport along Palo Verde Road. 
Option 2 West consists of constructing a reclaimed water pipeline along Johnson Road to pump north to 
the Tartesso USF. A groundwater study and cost evaluation will be needed to determine the option that 
will be most beneficial for the City. 
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Flow
(gpm)
Date
ASR Wells
RID Canal
To Irrigation
Arlington Canal
Total Reclaimed Flow

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-28 
Table 6.17 presents the required future reclaimed water recharge capacity for West Central Buckeye by 2040. 
Figure 6.12 shows that ASR well capacity expansion is required when WRF 3 is constructed and in 2038. 
Table 6.17 
West Central Buckeye Projected Reclaimed Water Capacity Requirements 
Reclaimed Water Flows 
Flow (gpm) 
2030 
2035 
2040 
Maximum Monthly Production 
690 
1,060 
1,580 
ASR Well Firm Capacity(1) 
0 
1,360 
2,050 
RID Canal(2) 
690 
690 
0 
Surplus (+)/Deficit (-) 
0 
990 
470 
Notes: 
(1) The capacity of an individual ASR well is assumed to be 1 mgd (1,100 AFY). 
(2) Flow to the RID Canal would only be required in the 2030 period if the City constructs a package plant in the Cipriani 
development. 
 
Figure 6.12 West Central Buckeye Reclaimed Water Recharge Capacity through 2040 
6.4.4.3 
Infrastructure Projects 
The following infrastructure projects are recommended, as shown in Figure 6.13 and described in 
Table 6.18. The ASR well projects would need a groundwater study prior to their implementation. 
Depending on whether the City chooses to use ASR wells for potable water recovery and treatment or 
periodically flush the wells and dispose of the flushing water, additional capital projects may need to be 
defined. If the City plans to recover water for potable use, then wellhead treatment, possibly with an RO 
treatment process that generates a brine stream, would need to be constructed. 
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Flow
(gpm)
Date
ASR Wells
RID Canal
Total Reclaimed Flow

10
Hassayampa
River
Dixie
Hassayampa
ngton
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Regional Park
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
McMicken
Gila Rive
Liberty
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
WR F
WR F
WWPP
WR F
U
T
U
T
U
T
U
T
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Perryville Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
RID Canal
Buckeye Canal
RW16,
RW17
RW23
RW19
RW21
RW15
RW28
RW30
RW32
RW25
RW18
RW33
RW29 RW31
RW12
RW20
RW22
RW13
RW24
RW34
RW14
RW26
RW27
RW11
Central WRF
Sundance WRF
Youngker
High School
Inca Elementary
School
Sundance Elementary
School
Tract A
Earl
Edgar
Park
Buckeye
Elementary
Sundance Park
Sundance
Golf Course
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch06\
O
0
1
0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 6.13  Central Buckeye Option 1 Recommended Reclaimed Water System Infrastructure
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
WR F
Proposed WRF
WWPP Proposed Package Plant
Reclaimed Water Users
U
T
Storage Tank
!ã
Well
!ã
Proposed Well
!ã
Proposed ASR Well
Canal
Reclaimed Water Main (inches)
6
8
10
12
20
21
Proposed Reclaimed Water Main
(inches)
8
12
16
24
Projected Development Phase
Existing
2030
2035
2040
Post 2040
Master Planned
Community

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-30 
Table 6.18 
Central Buckeye Reclaimed Infrastructure Projects 
Project 
Number 
Option 
Number 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/gpm/ 
AFY/acre) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
RW11 
All 
Construct a 24-inch reclaimed water pipeline from Central WRF along Beloat Road to Dean 
Road and along Dean Road to the Buckeye Canal. 
Increase capacity of reclaimed water able to be sent from 
Central to RID canal. 
24 
35,800 
Pump station at Central WRF has been upgraded. 
(2030) 
RW12 
All 
Replace the Central WRF pump station with a new one with a design flow of 4,800 gpm. 
Increase capacity of reclaimed water able to be sent from 
Central to RID canal. 
4,800 
1 
As soon as can be constructed. 
(2030) 
RW13 
All 
Upgrade Sundance pump station to a firm capacity of 1,500 gpm. 
Provide sufficient capacity and operational flexibility. 
1,500 
2 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water capacity. 
(2030) 
RW14 
1 East 
Construct a 16-inch reclaimed water pipeline along the RID canal from Dean Road to 215th 
Drive and along 215th Drive from the RID canal to Yuma Road. 
Deliver reclaimed water to ASR wells. 
16 
6,400 
Maximum month reclaimed water production exceeds flow 
that can be delivered to the RID Canal. 
(2030) 
RW15 
1 East 
Construct one ASR well on 215th Drive and Yuma Road. 
Expand reclaimed water capacity in Central Buckeye. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2030) 
RW16 
1 East 
Construct one ASR wells at the Tract A storage tank. 
Expand reclaimed water capacity in Central Buckeye. 
680 
1 
Project RW13 is constructed 
(2030) 
RW17 
1 East 
Construct a 1-mgd pump station at the Tract A storage tank. 
Deliver reclaimed water from the storage tank to the proposed 
ASR well. 
680 
1 
Project RW13 is constructed 
(2030) 
RW18 
1 East 
Construct a 16-inch reclaimed water pipeline along 215th Drive from Yuma Road to Hadley 
Street. 
Deliver reclaimed water to ASR well. 
16 
1,250 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW19 
1 East 
Construct one ASR well on 215th Drive and Hadley Street. 
Expand reclaimed water capacity in Central Buckeye. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW20 
1 East 
Construct a 16-inch reclaimed water pipeline along 215th Drive from Hadley Street to Morning 
Glory Street. 
Deliver reclaimed water to ASR well. 
16 
1,600 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW21 
1 East 
Construct one ASR well on 215th Drive and Morning Glory Street. 
Expand reclaimed water capacity in Central Buckeye. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW22 
1 East 
Construct a 12-inch reclaimed water pipeline along 215th Drive from Morning Glory Street to 
Adam Street. 
Deliver reclaimed water to ASR well. 
12 
1,600 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW23 
1 East 
Construct one ASR well on 215th Drive and Adam Street. 
Expand reclaimed water capacity in Central Buckeye. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW24 
1 East 
Construct a 12-inch reclaimed water pipeline along Adam Street from 215th Drive to Dean Road. Deliver reclaimed water to ASR well. 
12 
2,500 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW25 
1 East 
Construct one ASR well on Dean Road and Adam Street. 
Expand reclaimed water capacity in Central Buckeye. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW26 
1 West 
Construct an 8-inch pipeline from the Cipriani package plant to the RID Canal along Johnson 
Road. 
Deliver reclaimed water to the RID canal to obtain LTSCs. 
8 
4,600 
Package plant is constructed. 
(2030) 
RW27 
1 West 
Construct a 16-inch reclaimed water pipeline from WRF 3 to Lower Buckeye Road along Palo 
Verde Road. 
Connect ASR Wells to WRF 3. 
16 
22,600 
WRF 3 is constructed. 
(2035)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-31 
Project 
Number 
Option 
Number 
Description 
Justification 
Diameter/Size 
(inch/gpm/ 
AFY/acre) 
Length/Qty 
(feet or no.) 
Planning Triggers 
(Year) 
RW28 
1 West 
Construct two ASR wells along Palo Verde Street from Lower Buckeye Road to Wilson Avenue. Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
680 
2 
WRF 3 is constructed. 
(2035) 
RW29 
1 West 
Construct a 12-inch reclaimed water pipeline along Palo Verde Road from Lower Buckeye Road 
to Durango Street. 
Connect ASR Wells to WRF 3. 
12 
1,300 
Project RW26 is constructed. 
(2035) 
RW30 
1 West 
Construct one ASR wells along Palo Verde Street and Durango Street. 
Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2030) 
RW31 
1 West 
Construct a 12-inch reclaimed water pipeline along Palo Verde Road from Wilson Avenue to 
Durango Street. 
Connect ASR Wells to WRF 3. 
12 
1,300 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2030) 
RW32 
1 West 
Construct one ASR wells along Palo Verde Street and Pima Street. 
Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2040) 
RW33 
1 West 
Construct an 8-inch reclaimed water pipeline along Palo Verde Road from Durango Street to 
Pima Street. 
Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
8 
1,300 
Project RW21 is constructed. 
(2040) 
RW34 
1 West 
Construct a 4-mgd pump station at WRF 3 to pump reclaimed water to the ASR wells. 
Deliver reclaimed water to ASR wells. 
2,800 
1 
Completed when WRF 3 is constructed. 
(2035) 
RW35 
2 East 
Upsize the 12-inch reclaimed water pipeline from Sundance WRF to Younker High School to a 
16-inch pipeline. 
Deliver reclaimed water to ASR wells. 
16 
21,600 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water capacity. 
(2030) 
RW36 
2 East 
Construct one ASR wells along Lower Buckeye Road and Watson Road. 
Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2030) 
RW37 
2 East 
Construct one ASR well along Lower Buckeye Road and 237th Avenue. 
Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2030) 
RW38 
2 East 
Construct one ASR well along Lower Buckeye Road and 239th Drive. 
Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW39 
2 East 
Construct one ASR well along Lower Buckeye Road and 241st Drive. 
Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW40 
2 East 
Construct one ASR well along Lower Buckeye Road and Apache Road. 
Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW41 
2 East 
Construct one ASR well along Lower Buckeye Road and RID Service Road. 
Increase reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
680 
1 
Maximum month reclaimed water production surpasses 
existing reclaimed water recharge capacity. 
(2035) 
RW42 
2 West 
Construct a 16-inch reclaimed water pipeline from WRF 3 along Palo Verde Road to Southern 
Avenue and along Southern Avenue to the Cipriani Package Plant along Johnson Road. 
Connect WRF 3 to Tartesso USF. 
16 
23,400 
WRF 3 is constructed. 
(2035) 
RW43 
2 West 
Construct a 16-inch reclaimed water pipeline along Johnson Road from the Cipriani Package 
Plant on Southern Avenue to McDowell Road and along McDowell Road to Tartesso WRF. 
Connect WRF 3 to Tartesso USF. 
16 
34,400 
WRF 3 is constructed. 
(2035) 
RW44 
2 West 
Expand the Tartesso USF by an additional 1,700 AFY. 
Increase reclaimed water capacity. 
1,700 
1 
WRF 3 is constructed. 
(2035) 
RW45 
2 West 
Construct a 4-mgd pump station at WRF 3 to pump reclaimed water to the Tartesso USF. 
Provide reclaimed water pumping capacity. 
2,800 
1 
WRF 3 is constructed. 
(2035)

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
6-32 
6.5 
Conclusion and Recommendations 
1. The Sun City Festival reclaimed water system should construct a USF with an initial flow capacity of 
2,700 gpm. A 500 gpm USF expansion should be completed when the reclaimed water production 
surpasses the initial capacity of the USF. 
2. The City should construct a 16-inch pipeline from the Sun City Festival WRF to the CAP canal to 
recharge reclaimed water. 
3. The City should conduct a groundwater study near the Floreo development to confirm the viability of 
USF by the Wagner Wash when the WRF is constructed. The initial flow capacity of the USF should be 
540 gpm. 
4. The City should conduct a groundwater study in the Tartesso reclaimed water system to confirm the 
viability of constructing a USF closer to potable wells, possibly near the intersection of Thomas Road 
and Johnson Road. The initial flow capacity of the USF should be 1,000 gpm. 
5. The Central WRF reclaimed water pump station should be expanded to a firm capacity of 4,800 gpm 
and construct a 24-inch diameter pipeline from the Central WRF to the Buckeye Canal so that LTSCs 
can be obtained for the reclaimed water not used for irrigation. 
6. The Sundance WRF pump station delivering water for irrigation should be replaced with a new 
1,500 gpm pump station to provide capacity for water users. 
7. The City should conduct a groundwater study to confirm the viability of constructing five ASR wells 
each with a capacity of 1 mgd on Yuma Road and Verrado Way by the abandoned Goodyear Luke 
Auxiliary Satellite Airfield. If favorable, this area is recommended for an ASR wellfield. 
8. The City should conduct a groundwater study to confirm the viability of constructing four ASR wells 
each with a capacity of 1 mgd along Palo Verde Road from Lower Buckeye Road to Pima Street. If 
favorable, this area is recommended as an ASR wellfield.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
 
APPENDIX 2A 
MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FLOWS

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-1 
Note: In the tables below, the total demand in each water planning area includes demands for land areas where a 
development has not been defined. 
Table 2A.1 
Master Planned Community Development Projected Flows 
Water 
Planning 
Area 
Master Planned Community 
Name 
Buildout Water 
Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water Planning 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow (gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
1 
Sun City Festival 
3,511,000 
5.0% 
1,969,000 
1,811,000 
1 
Sun Valley Villages I and II 
6,389,000 
9.1% 
3,584,000 
3,297,000 
1 
Teravalis 
42,151,000 
59.7% 
23,641,000 
21,750,000 
1 
Floreo at Teravalis 
3,504,000 
5.0% 
1,966,000 
1,809,000 
2 
Elianto 
4,590,000 
12.8% 
2,574,000 
2,368,000 
2 
Montiere 
630,000 
1.8% 
353,000 
325,000 
2 
Sun Valley South 
7,177,000 
20.0% 
4,025,000 
3,703,000 
2 
Tartesso 
10,213,000 
28.5% 
5,728,000 
5,270,000 
2 
Tartesso West 
4,167,000 
11.6% 
2,337,000 
2,150,000 
2 
Valle Del Rio 
431,000 
1.2% 
242,000 
223,000 
2 
Valle Del Sol 
522,000 
1.5% 
293,000 
270,000 
3 
Cipriani 
2,212,000 
9.8% 
1,241,000 
1,142,000 
3 
Desert Creek 
2,663,000 
11.8% 
1,494,000 
1,374,000 
3 
Monte Verde 
275,000 
1.2% 
154,000 
142,000 
3 
Mountain View Business Center 
161,000 
0.7% 
90,000 
83,000 
3 
Silver Rock 
1,981,000 
8.8% 
1,111,000 
1,022,000 
3 
Sundance 
3,724,000 
16.5% 
2,089,000 
1,922,000 
3 
Westpark 
663,000 
2.9% 
372,000 
342,000 
3 
Westwind 
924,000 
4.1% 
518,000 
477,000 
4A 
Blue Horizons 
8,000 
0.0% 
5,000 
5,000 
4A 
Cipriani 
3,000 
0.0% 
2,000 
2,000 
4A 
Copper Falls 
221,000 
1.2% 
124,000 
114,000 
4A 
Henry Park 
477,000 
2.5% 
268,000 
247,000 
4A 
Southwest Ranch 
939,000 
4.9% 
527,000 
485,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-2 
Table 2A.2 
Area 1 Other Development Projected Flows 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water Planning 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water 
Flow (gpd) 
Teravalis 
42,151,000 
59.72% 
23,641,000 21,750,000 
Festival Foothills Phase 1 
133,000 
0.19% 
75,000 
69,000 
Festival Foothills Phase 2 Unit 15 and 17 
47,000 
0.07% 
27,000 
25,000 
Festival Foothills Phase 2 Unit 19 
32,000 
0.05% 
18,000 
17,000 
Festival Foothills Phase 2 Unit 21 
10,000 
0.01% 
6,000 
6,000 
Festival Foothills Phase 2 Unit 23 
19,000 
0.03% 
10,000 
9,000 
Festival Foothills Phase 3 Unit 25 
32,000 
0.05% 
18,000 
17,000 
Festival Foothills Phase 3 Unit 27 
36,000 
0.05% 
20,000 
18,000 
Festival Foothills Phase 3 Unit 29 
37,000 
0.05% 
21,000 
19,000 
Festival Foothills Phase 3 Unit 31 
36,000 
0.05% 
20,000 
18,000 
Festival Ranch 
18,000 
0.03% 
8,000 
7,000 
Festival Ranch 1 
29,000 
0.04% 
16,000 
15,000 
Festival Ranch 10 
5,226,000 
7.40% 
2,931,000 
2,697,000 
Festival Ranch 12 
9,000 
0.01% 
5,000 
5,000 
Festival Ranch 2 
72,000 
0.10% 
41,000 
38,000 
Festival Ranch 3 
586,000 
0.83% 
329,000 
303,000 
Festival Ranch 4 
71,000 
0.10% 
40,000 
37,000 
Festival Ranch 5 
15,000 
0.02% 
8,000 
7,000 
Festival Ranch 6 
7,000 
0.01% 
4,000 
4,000 
Festival Ranch 7 
41,000 
0.06% 
23,000 
21,000 
Festival Ranch 8 
1,000 
0.00% 
300 
0 
Festival Ranch Planning Area 3 Parcel 33 
40,000 
0.06% 
23,000 
21,000 
Festival Ranch Planning Area 3 Parcel 35 
58,000 
0.08% 
33,000 
30,000 
Festival Ranch Planning Unit F of Planning Area 3 
691,000 
0.98% 
388,000 
357,000 
North Star Ranch 1 
2,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
North Star Ranch 2 
2,338,000 
3.31% 
1,311,000 
1,206,000 
North Star Ranch Phase 1 
664,000 
0.94% 
373,000 
343,000 
Sun City Festival Amenity Center 
15,000 
0.02% 
8,000 
7,000 
Sun City Festival L1-2 
30,000 
0.04% 
17,000 
16,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel A1 
12,000 
0.02% 
7,000 
6,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel A1 Phase 3 
5,000 
0.01% 
3,000 
3,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel A1 Phase 4 
10,000 
0.01% 
6,000 
6,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel AA1 Phase 1 
34,000 
0.05% 
19,000 
17,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel AA1 Phase 2 
41,000 
0.06% 
23,000 
21,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-3 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water Planning 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water 
Flow (gpd) 
Sun City Festival Parcel B1 
124,000 
0.18% 
70,000 
64,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel C1 
43,000 
0.06% 
24,000 
22,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel D1 
45,000 
0.06% 
25,000 
23,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel DD1 
10,000 
0.01% 
5,000 
5,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel H2 Phase 1 
36,000 
0.05% 
20,000 
18,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel H2 Phase 2 
9,000 
0.01% 
5,000 
5,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel HH1-1 
40,000 
0.06% 
23,000 
21,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel HH1-2 
21,000 
0.03% 
12,000 
11,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel HH1-3 
20,000 
0.03% 
11,000 
10,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel HH1-4 
40,000 
0.06% 
23,000 
21,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel HH1-5 
21,000 
0.03% 
12,000 
11,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel I1 
46,000 
0.07% 
26,000 
24,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel J1 
50,000 
0.07% 
28,000 
26,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel J2 
16,000 
0.02% 
9,000 
8,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel K1 
38,000 
0.05% 
21,000 
19,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel L1 
38,000 
0.05% 
21,000 
19,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel N1 
33,000 
0.05% 
19,000 
17,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel O1 Phase 1 
27,000 
0.04% 
15,000 
14,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel O1 Phase 2 
28,000 
0.04% 
16,000 
15,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel P1 
44,000 
0.06% 
25,000 
23,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel Q1 Phase 1 
32,000 
0.05% 
18,000 
17,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel Q1 Phase 2 
16,000 
0.02% 
9,000 
8,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel R1 
44,000 
0.06% 
25,000 
23,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel S1 
36,000 
0.05% 
20,000 
18,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel T1 
33,000 
0.05% 
18,000 
17,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel U1 
16,000 
0.02% 
9,000 
8,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel V1 
17,000 
0.02% 
10,000 
9,000 
Sun City Festival Parcel Z1 
16,000 
0.02% 
9,000 
8,000 
Sun City Festival Parcels E1 and F1 
75,000 
0.11% 
42,000 
39,000 
Sun City Festival Parcels G1 and H1 
71,000 
0.10% 
40,000 
37,000 
Sun City Festival Parcels M1 and R1 
44,000 
0.06% 
25,000 
23,000 
Sun City Festival Planning Area 2 - Parcel A2 
33,000 
0.05% 
19,000 
17,000 
Sun City Festival Planning Area 2 - Parcel B2 
20,000 
0.03% 
11,000 
10,000 
Sun City Festival Planning Area 2 - Parcel C2 
36,000 
0.05% 
20,000 
18,000 
Sun City Festival Planning Area 2 - Parcel D2 
43,000 
0.06% 
24,000 
22,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-4 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water Planning 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water 
Flow (gpd) 
Sun City Festival Planning Area 2 - Parcel E2 
9,000 
0.01% 
5,000 
5,000 
Sun City Festival Planning Area 2 - Parcel F2 
52,000 
0.07% 
29,000 
27,000 
Sun City Festival Planning Area 2 - Parcel L2 
12,000 
0.02% 
7,000 
6,000 
Sun City Festival Planning Area 2 - Parcel M2 
4,000 
0.01% 
2,000 
2,000 
Sun City Festival Planning Area 2 - Parcels K2 and N2 18,000 
0.03% 
10,000 
9,000 
Sun Valley Area Plan 
6,980,000 
9.89% 
3,915,000 
3,602,000 
Sun Valley Villages I and II 
6,389,000 
9.05% 
3,584,000 
3,297,000 
Teravalis 
2,499,000 
3.54% 
1,401,000 
1,289,000 
Trillium Community Center 
13,000 
0.02% 
7,000 
6,000 
Trillium Community Park 
64,000 
0.09% 
36,000 
33,000 
Trillium Village 3 Parcel 37 
20,000 
0.03% 
11,000 
10,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 38 
32,000 
0.05% 
18,000 
17,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 39 
14,000 
0.02% 
8,000 
7,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 40 
30,000 
0.04% 
17,000 
16,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 41 
27,000 
0.04% 
15,000 
14,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 42 
22,000 
0.03% 
13,000 
12,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 43 
25,000 
0.04% 
14,000 
13,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 44 
25,000 
0.04% 
14,000 
13,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 45 
24,000 
0.03% 
13,000 
12,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 46 
28,000 
0.04% 
16,000 
15,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 47 
20,000 
0.03% 
11,000 
10,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 48 
20,000 
0.03% 
11,000 
10,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Parcel 49 
22,000 
0.03% 
12,000 
11,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Unit 1 
397,000 
0.56% 
223,000 
205,000 
Teravalis Village 3 Unit 2 
222,000 
0.31% 
125,000 
115,000 
Total 
70,777,000 
100% 
39,699,300 36,522,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-5 
Table 2A.3 
Area 2 Other Development Projected Flows 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water Demand 
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water Planning 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
Buckeye Ranchos 2 (County) 
37,000 
0.10% 
21,000 
19,000 
Buckeye Ranchos 3 (County) 
20,000 
0.06% 
11,000 
10,000 
Elianto 
4,590,000 
12.80% 
2,570,000 
2,364,000 
Hassayampa Ranches (County) 
411,000 
1.15% 
230,000 
212,000 
Montana Vista (County) 
16,000 
0.04% 
9,000 
8,000 
Montiere 
630,000 
1.76% 
353,000 
325,000 
Sun Valley Area Plan 
3,448,000 
9.62% 
1,931,000 
1,777,000 
Sun Valley South 
7,177,000 
20.02% 
4,019,000 
3,697,000 
Sweetwater Estates 
20,000 
0.06% 
11,000 
10,000 
Tartesso 
10,213,000 
28.48% 
5,719,000 
5,261,000 
Tartesso Elementary School #2 
12,000 
0.03% 
7,000 
6,000 
Tartesso Unit 1 
233,000 
0.65% 
130,000 
120,000 
Tartesso Unit 2A 
379,000 
1.06% 
212,000 
195,000 
Tartesso Unit 2B 
414,000 
1.15% 
232,000 
213,000 
Tartesso West 
4,167,000 
11.62% 
2,334,000 
2,147,000 
Tartesso West 1 
645,000 
1.80% 
361,000 
332,000 
Tartesso West 2 
50,000 
0.14% 
28,000 
26,000 
Tartesso West Unit 3A 
962,000 
2.68% 
539,000 
496,000 
Valle Del Rio 
431,000 
1.20% 
241,000 
222,000 
Valle Del Sol 
522,000 
1.46% 
292,000 
269,000 
West Phoenix Estates (County) 
254,000 
0.71% 
142,000 
131,000 
Total 
34,631,000 
96.58% 
19,392,000  
17,840,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-6 
Table 2A.4 
Area 3 Other Development Projected Flows 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water 
Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water 
Planning Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
10 W Commerce Park 
50,000 
0.22% 
28,000 
26,000 
5 Below 
46,000 
0.20% 
26,000 
24,000 
Acacia Crossing 
146,000 
0.65% 
82,000 
75,000 
Aldi's 
3,000 
0.01% 
2,000 
2,000 
Anderson Parc 
148,000 
0.66% 
83,000 
76,000 
Bentridge Phase 1 
34,000 
0.15% 
19,000 
17,000 
Bentridge Phase 2 
41,000 
0.18% 
23,000 
21,000 
Buckeye 252 
90,000 
0.40% 
50,000 
46,000 
Buckeye Airport Zoning District1 
762,000 
3.38% 
427,000 
393,000 
Buckeye Airport Zoning District 2 
501,000 
2.22% 
281,000 
259,000 
Buckeye North 
17,000 
0.08% 
10,000 
9,000 
Buckeye Parkway Center 
12,000 
0.05% 
7,000 
6,000 
Buckeye Ranchos 
85,000 
0.38% 
48,000 
44,000 
Buena Vista 
158,000 
0.70% 
88,000 
81,000 
Burger King 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Christian Brothers Auto 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
Cipriani 1 
659,000 
2.92% 
369,000 
339,000 
Cipriani 2 
1,550,000 
6.87% 
868,000 
799,000 
Coyote Ridge 
160,000 
0.71% 
90,000 
83,000 
Crimson Canyon 
28,000 
0.12% 
16,000 
15,000 
Deep Truck Wash 
3,000 
0.01% 
2,000 
2,000 
Desert Creek 
2,663,000 
11.80% 
1,491,000 
1,372,000 
Desert Hills Baptist Church Expansion and Parking Lot 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Desert Moon Estates Parcel 7 
26,000 
0.12% 
15,000 
14,000 
Desert Moon Estates Parcel 8 
23,000 
0.10% 
13,000 
12,000 
Desert Moon Estates Parcels 6A and 6B 
20,000 
0.09% 
11,000 
10,000 
Desert Moon Estates Phase 1 Parcel 1 
33,000 
0.15% 
18,000 
17,000 
Desert Moon Estates Phase 1 Parcel 2 
44,000 
0.19% 
25,000 
23,000 
Desert Moon Estates Phase 2 Parcel 3 
23,000 
0.10% 
13,000 
12,000 
Desert Moon Estates Phase 2 Parcel 4 
29,000 
0.13% 
16,000 
15,000 
Desert Moon Estates Phase 2 Parcel 5 
26,000 
0.12% 
15,000 
14,000 
Ed Key Charter School 
10,000 
0.04% 
6,000 
6,000 
Empire SW 
31,000 
0.14% 
17,000 
16,000 
Escobar Minor Land Division 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-7 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water 
Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water 
Planning Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
GL Logistics 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Greulichs Automotive 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
Hancock Communities - White Tanks (Sundance Cove II) 120,000 
0.53% 
67,000 
62,000 
Homes at Susan Ranch 
44,000 
0.19% 
25,000 
23,000 
Hopeville (County) 
17,000 
0.08% 
10,000 
9,000 
Industrial Buildings at SE Verrado and Roosevelt 
23,000 
0.10% 
13,000 
12,000 
John McCain Elementary School 
18,000 
0.08% 
10,000 
9,000 
Loves Travel Stops and Country Stores 
9,000 
0.04% 
5,000 
5,000 
Miller and Lower Buckeye MLD 
16,000 
0.07% 
9,000 
8,000 
Miller Commerce Center 
16,000 
0.07% 
9,000 
8,000 
Miller Crossings 
22,000 
0.10% 
12,000 
11,000 
Miller Road Retail 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
Monte Verde 1 
373,000 
1.65% 
209,000 
192,000 
Monte Verde 2 
157,000 
0.70% 
88,000 
81,000 
Monte Verde CMP Amendment 
257,000 
1.14% 
144,000 
132,000 
Mountain View Business Center 1 
0 
0.00% 
0 
0 
Mountain View Business Center 2 
135,000 
0.60% 
76,000 
70,000 
Mountain View North Business Park 
0 
0.00% 
0 
0 
Mountain View South 
13,000 
0.06% 
7,000 
6,000 
Odyssey Institute 
5,000 
0.02% 
3,000 
3,000 
Phoenix Skyline West 1 
71,000 
0.31% 
40,000 
37,000 
Phoenix Skyline West 2 
0 
0.00% 
0 
0 
Phoenix Skyline West 3 (County) 
74,000 
0.33% 
41,000 
38,000 
Planet Fitness 
5,000 
0.02% 
3,000 
3,000 
Quick Quack Car Wash 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
SEC Yuma Rd and Dean Rd 
19,000 
0.08% 
11,000 
10,000 
Sequoia High School 
7,000 
0.03% 
4,000 
4,000 
Shadow Canyon 
0 
0.00% 
0 
0 
Silver Rock 
1,981,000 
8.78% 
1,109,000 
1,020,000 
Summit Community Church 
23,000 
0.10% 
13,000 
12,000 
Sundance 
3,724,000 
16.50% 
2,085,000 
1,918,000 
Sundance - Buckeye Senior Care Campus 
0 
0.00% 
0 
0 
Sundance 1 
75,000 
0.33% 
42,000 
39,000 
Sundance 2 
0 
0.00% 
0 
0 
Sundance 11 
304,000 
1.35% 
170,000 
156,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-8 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water 
Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water 
Planning Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
Sundance 13 
41,000 
0.18% 
23,000 
21,000 
Sundance 3 
44,000 
0.19% 
25,000 
23,000 
Sundance 4 
25,000 
0.11% 
14,000 
13,000 
Sundance 5 
7,000 
0.03% 
4,000 
4,000 
Sundance 6 
58,000 
0.26% 
32,000 
29,000 
Sundance 7 
212,000 
0.94% 
119,000 
109,000 
Sundance Business Center - 3 Minute Car Wash 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Sundance Business Center - Dutch Bros 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
Sundance Business Center - My Place Hotel 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Sundance Business Center - Phase 1 Bldg 1 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
Sundance Business Center - Phase 1 Bldg 3 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
Sundance Business Center - Sundance Self Storage 
4,000 
0.02% 
2,000 
2,000 
Sundance Business Center - Yuma and Watson Shops 2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Sundance Corporate Plaza - overall site work 
9,000 
0.04% 
5,000 
5,000 
Sundance Corporate Plaza - Shell building on Parcel 1 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
Sundance Cove 
118,000 
0.52% 
66,000 
61,000 
Sundance Parcel 10 
8,000 
0.04% 
4,000 
4,000 
Sundance Parcel 12 
19,000 
0.08% 
11,000 
10,000 
Sundance Parcel 13 
31,000 
0.14% 
17,000 
16,000 
Sundance Parcel 14 
26,000 
0.12% 
15,000 
14,000 
Sundance Parcel 15 
70,000 
0.31% 
39,000 
36,000 
Sundance Parcel 16 
40,000 
0.18% 
22,000 
20,000 
Sundance Parcel 17 
35,000 
0.16% 
20,000 
18,000 
Sundance Parcel 18 
33,000 
0.15% 
18,000 
17,000 
Sundance Parcel 19 
72,000 
0.32% 
40,000 
37,000 
Sundance Parcel 2 
94,000 
0.42% 
53,000 
49,000 
Sundance Parcel 20 
32,000 
0.14% 
18,000 
17,000 
Sundance Parcel 20A 
10,000 
0.04% 
6,000 
6,000 
Sundance Parcel 21 
31,000 
0.14% 
17,000 
16,000 
Sundance Parcel 22 
46,000 
0.20% 
26,000 
24,000 
Sundance Parcel 23A 
47,000 
0.21% 
26,000 
24,000 
Sundance Parcel 23B 
16,000 
0.07% 
9,000 
8,000 
Sundance Parcel 24 
13,000 
0.06% 
7,000 
6,000 
Sundance Parcel 25 
34,000 
0.15% 
19,000 
17,000 
Sundance Parcel 26 
34,000 
0.15% 
19,000 
17,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-9 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water 
Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water 
Planning Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
Sundance Parcel 27 
49,000 
0.22% 
27,000 
25,000 
Sundance Parcel 28A 
31,000 
0.14% 
17,000 
16,000 
Sundance Parcel 28B 
53,000 
0.23% 
30,000 
28,000 
Sundance Parcel 29 
27,000 
0.12% 
15,000 
14,000 
Sundance Parcel 31 
95,000 
0.42% 
53,000 
49,000 
Sundance Parcel 36 
33,000 
0.15% 
18,000 
17,000 
Sundance Parcel 37A 
47,000 
0.21% 
26,000 
24,000 
Sundance Parcel 37B 
66,000 
0.29% 
37,000 
34,000 
Sundance Parcel 38 
15,000 
0.07% 
8,000 
7,000 
Sundance Parcel 40 
68,000 
0.30% 
38,000 
35,000 
Sundance Parcel 41 
18,000 
0.08% 
10,000 
9,000 
Sundance Parcel 42 
45,000 
0.20% 
25,000 
23,000 
Sundance Parcel 43 and 34B 
67,000 
0.30% 
38,000 
35,000 
Sundance Parcel 45A 
21,000 
0.09% 
12,000 
11,000 
Sundance Parcel 45B 
12,000 
0.05% 
7,000 
6,000 
Sundance Parcel 45C 
14,000 
0.06% 
8,000 
7,000 
Sundance Parcel 46A 46B 
77,000 
0.34% 
43,000 
40,000 
Sundance Parcel 47 
4,000 
0.02% 
2,000 
2,000 
Sundance Parcel 48 
76,000 
0.34% 
43,000 
40,000 
Sundance Parcel 49A 
25,000 
0.11% 
14,000 
13,000 
Sundance Parcels 32, 33, and 35 
50,000 
0.22% 
28,000 
26,000 
Sundance Parcel 7 
0 
0.00% 
0 
0 
Sundance Towne Center - Quik Trip  
3,000 
0.01% 
2,000 
2,000 
Sundance Towne Center - The Shops on Parcel H 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
Superstar Car Wash 
1,000 
0.00% 
1,000 
1,000 
U-Haul 
11,000 
0.05% 
6,000 
6,000 
Verrado and I-10 MLD 
45,000 
0.20% 
25,000 
23,000 
Verrado Logistics Center 
27,000 
0.12% 
15,000 
14,000 
Village at Sundance Phase 1 Parcel 3B 
20,000 
0.09% 
11,000 
10,000 
Village at Sundance Phase 1 Parcel 4 
40,000 
0.18% 
22,000 
20,000 
Village at Sundance Phase 1 Parcel 5 
36,000 
0.16% 
20,000 
18,000 
Village at Sundance Phase 2 Parcel 1 
38,000 
0.17% 
21,000 
19,000 
Village at Sundance Phase 2 Parcel 2 
32,000 
0.14% 
18,000 
17,000 
Village at Sundance Phase 2 Parcel 3A 
18,000 
0.08% 
10,000 
9,000 
Watson Estates 
528,000 
2.34% 
296,000 
272,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-10 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water 
Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water 
Planning Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
West Mec Phase 3 
5,000 
0.02% 
3,000 
3,000 
West Mec Phase 3B 
5,000 
0.02% 
3,000 
3,000 
West Mec Phase 4 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Westpark 1 
189,000 
0.84% 
106,000 
98,000 
Westpark 2 
21,000 
0.09% 
12,000 
11,000 
Westpark 2.2 PrePlat 
252,000 
1.12% 
141,000 
130,000 
WestPark 3 
387,000 
1.71% 
217,000 
200,000 
Westpark Parcel 1 
21,000 
0.09% 
12,000 
11,000 
Westpark Parcel 14 
35,000 
0.16% 
20,000 
18,000 
Westpark Parcel 15N 
19,000 
0.08% 
11,000 
10,000 
Westpark Parcel 15S 
12,000 
0.05% 
7,000 
6,000 
Westpark Parcel 16N 
23,000 
0.10% 
13,000 
12,000 
Westpark Parcel 16S 
28,000 
0.12% 
16,000 
15,000 
Westpark Parcel 17N 
44,000 
0.19% 
25,000 
23,000 
Westpark Parcel 17S 
30,000 
0.13% 
17,000 
16,000 
Westpark Parcel 18S 
45,000 
0.20% 
25,000 
23,000 
Westpark Parcel 2N 
22,000 
0.10% 
12,000 
11,000 
Westpark Parcel 2S 
16,000 
0.07% 
9,000 
8,000 
Westpark Parcel 3N 
27,000 
0.12% 
15,000 
14,000 
Westpark Parcel 3S 
22,000 
0.10% 
12,000 
11,000 
Westpark Parcel 4N 
40,000 
0.18% 
22,000 
20,000 
Westpark Parcel 4S 
27,000 
0.12% 
15,000 
14,000 
Westwind 1 
182,000 
0.81% 
102,000 
94,000 
Westwind 2 
741,000 
3.28% 
415,000 
382,000 
White Tanks Vista (County) 
322,000 
1.43% 
180,000 
166,000 
Windmill Village 
312,000 
1.38% 
175,000 
161,000 
Yuma and Apache Bungalows 
101,000 
0.45% 
57,000 
52,000 
Total 
20,782,000 
92.08% 
11,645,000 
10,720,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-11 
Table 2A.5 
Area 4A Other Development Projected Flows 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water Demand 
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand 
in the DAWS 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
AAMCO 
1,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Alder Farms 
332,000 
1.74% 
186,000 
171,000 
Algodon Phase 2 
50,000 
0.26% 
28,000 
26,000 
Algodon Phase 3 
40,000 
0.21% 
22,000 
20,000 
Apache Farms 
180,000 
0.94% 
101,000 
93,000 
AVALON 
291,000 
1.52% 
163,000 
150,000 
Blue Hills 
274,000 
1.44% 
153,000 
141,000 
Blue Horizons 
8,000 
0.04% 
4,000 
4,000 
Broadway And Perryville 
18,000 
0.09% 
10,000 
9,000 
Buckeye 320 
190,000 
1.00% 
106,000 
98,000 
Buckeye Miller 60 
142,000 
0.74% 
80,000 
74,000 
Buckeye Park 
35,000 
0.18% 
20,000 
18,000 
Cardinal Capital Industrial Park 
188,000 
0.98% 
105,000 
97,000 
Cardinal IG Plant Expansion 
68,000 
0.36% 
38,000 
35,000 
Cipriani 
3,000 
0.02% 
2,000 
2,000 
Copper Falls 
292,000 
1.53% 
164,000 
151,000 
Cotton Meadows South 
115,000 
0.60% 
64,000 
59,000 
Cottonwood 
304,000 
1.59% 
170,000 
156,000 
Crystal Vista 
193,000 
1.01% 
108,000 
99,000 
Crystal Vista - Offsite improvements 
4,000 
0.02% 
2,000 
2,000 
Dove Cove Estates 
196,000 
1.03% 
110,000 
101,000 
Estrella Vista 
326,000 
1.71% 
183,000 
168,000 
Farallon 
305,000 
1.60% 
171,000 
157,000 
Farallon Unit 1 
105,000 
0.55% 
59,000 
54,000 
Farallon Unit 2 
108,000 
0.57% 
60,000 
55,000 
Farallon Unit 3 
92,000 
0.48% 
52,000 
48,000 
Filibertos 
1,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Hayden Estates 
135,000 
0.71% 
76,000 
70,000 
Henry Park 
477,000 
2.50% 
267,000 
246,000 
Heritage West 
502,000 
2.63% 
281,000 
259,000 
Legacy Trails 
370,000 
1.94% 
207,000 
190,000 
Los Ranchitos De Los Conejos (County) 
9,000 
0.05% 
5,000 
5,000 
Mayfield 
333,000 
1.74% 
186,000 
171,000 
Mayfield Phase 1 
65,000 
0.34% 
36,000 
33,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-12 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water Demand 
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand 
in the DAWS 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
Miller Buckeye 80 
87,000 
0.46% 
49,000 
45,000 
Miller Manor 
162,000 
0.85% 
91,000 
84,000 
Miller Marketplace 
15,000 
0.08% 
8,000 
7,000 
Miller Marketplace - AutoZone Store #5065 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Miller Park 
58,000 
0.30% 
32,000 
29,000 
Monroe Ranch 
82,000 
0.43% 
46,000 
42,000 
Montana Vista II 
192,000 
1.01% 
108,000 
99,000 
Mountain View South 
326,000 
1.71% 
183,000 
168,000 
Mystic Vista Phase 1 
89,000 
0.47% 
50,000 
46,000 
Mystic Vista Phase 2 
82,000 
0.43% 
46,000 
42,000 
Nesselrotte Place 
4,000 
0.02% 
2,000 
2,000 
Northwood Park Estates Unit 1 
13,000 
0.07% 
7,000 
6,000 
Northwood Park Estates Unit 2 
20,000 
0.10% 
11,000 
10,000 
NWC SR85 & Baseline from RU-43 to Light Industrial 
214,000 
1.12% 
120,000 
110,000 
Odyssey Institute 
1,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Parker Fasteners Renovation 
16,000 
0.08% 
9,000 
8,000 
Primrose Estates (County) 
16,000 
0.08% 
9,000 
8,000 
Rainbow Ranch 
185,000 
0.97% 
104,000 
96,000 
Rancho Vista 
226,000 
1.18% 
127,000 
117,000 
Riata West Unit 1 
132,000 
0.69% 
74,000 
68,000 
Riata West Unit 2 
138,000 
0.72% 
77,000 
71,000 
Rooks & Broadway 
59,000 
0.31% 
33,000 
30,000 
Roosevelt Citrus Acres 2 
131,000 
0.69% 
73,000 
67,000 
Roosevelt Citrus Acres 3 
314,000 
1.65% 
176,000 
162,000 
San Madera 
360,000 
1.89% 
202,000 
186,000 
Shoppes At Miller Park 
15,000 
0.08% 
8,000 
7,000 
Sonoran Vista Unit 1 
43,000 
0.23% 
24,000 
22,000 
Sonoran Vista Unit 2 
120,000 
0.63% 
67,000 
62,000 
Southern and Apache 
90,000 
0.47% 
50,000 
46,000 
Southwest Ranch 
939,000 
4.92% 
526,000 
484,000 
Sunset Point 
248,000 
1.30% 
139,000 
128,000 
Sunset Vista 
182,000 
0.95% 
102,000 
94,000 
The Homestead 
309,000 
1.62% 
173,000 
159,000 
Turner 308 
275,000 
1.44% 
154,000 
142,000 
Tyler Ranch Phase 1 
8,000 
0.04% 
4,000 
4,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-13 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water Demand 
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand 
in the DAWS 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
Tyler Ranch Phase 2 
45,000 
0.24% 
25,000 
23,000 
Tyler Ranch Phase 3 
40,000 
0.21% 
22,000 
20,000 
Valencia 
182,000 
0.95% 
102,000 
94,000 
Valencia Homes 
12,000 
0.06% 
7,000 
6,000 
Valencia Manor 
27,000 
0.14% 
15,000 
14,000 
Ventana Ranch 
608,000 
3.19% 
340,000 
313,000 
Village On Broadway 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Vista @ Buckeye 
106,000 
0.56% 
59,000 
54,000 
Vista Bonita 
191,000 
1.00% 
107,000 
98,000 
Vista Del Sol 
164,000 
0.86% 
92,000 
85,000 
West Pointe Baptist Church 
8,000 
0.04% 
4,000 
4,000 
White Tank Citrus TR Plat A (County) 
17,000 
0.09% 
10,000 
9,000 
Total 
12,307,000 
64.48% 
6,891,000 
6,338,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-14 
Table 2A.6 
Area 4B Other Development Projected Flows 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water 
Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water Planning 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
204 E Roosevelt Ave Replat 
500 
0.00% 
300 
300 
703 E Monroe Residences (Apartments) 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
726 E Monroe Ave Site Plan 
400 
0.00% 
200 
200 
Allenville 
150,000 
1.04% 
84,000 
77,000 
Amigos Auto Repair 
600 
0.00% 
300 
300 
Angulo Residence 
200 
0.00% 
100 
100 
Bella Vagare 
152,000 
1.05% 
85,000 
78,000 
Buckeye 29 
32,000 
0.22% 
18,000 
17,000 
Buckeye 62 
107,800 
0.75% 
60,000 
55,000 
Buckeye Blk  1-3, 10-15 
75,000 
0.52% 
42,000 
39,000 
Buckeye Industrial Rail Park / Project Alpha 
163,200 
1.13% 
91,000 
84,000 
Buckeye Re-Plat Unit 1 
5,000 
0.03% 
3,000 
3,000 
Buckeye Re-Plat Unit 2 
3,000 
0.02% 
2,000 
2,000 
Camelot Condominiums 
5,000 
0.03% 
3,000 
3,000 
Case IH Equipment 
10,100 
0.07% 
6,000 
6,000 
Central Buckeye 
100,000 
0.69% 
56,000 
52,000 
Children's 2011 LLC 
30,900 
0.21% 
17,000 
16,000 
Clanton Avenue Rezone and Replat 
1,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Clanton-Thayer 
4,000 
0.03% 
2,000 
2,000 
Derosier Place 
6,000 
0.04% 
3,000 
3,000 
Duncan Manor 
1,800 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
East Allenville 
71,000 
0.49% 
40,000 
37,000 
East Sunland 
1,800 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Elms Tract 
7,000 
0.05% 
4,000 
4,000 
Encantada Estates 
183,600 
1.27% 
103,000 
95,000 
Estrellas Garden 
98,000 
0.68% 
55,000 
51,000 
George Tract 
20,100 
0.14% 
11,000 
10,000 
Gerben Boschma Dairy Minor Subdivision 
1,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Grier Ranch 
208,900 
1.44% 
117,000 
108,000 
Ironwood Vista 
34,000 
0.24% 
19,000 
17,000 
Kore Power 
188,100 
1.30% 
105,000 
97,000 
MC-85 & Rooks Road Project Rezone 
98,000 
0.68% 
55,000 
51,000 
MC85 and Shepards Trail 
210,900 
1.46% 
118,000 
109,000 
Mountain View Estates 
98,000 
0.68% 
55,000 
51,000

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
2A-15 
Development Name 
Buildout  
Water 
Demand  
(gpd) 
Percentage of 
Water Demand in 
the Water Planning 
Area (%) 
Buildout 
Wastewater 
Flow  
(gpd) 
Buildout 
Reclaimed 
Water Flow 
(gpd) 
MURCO 
7,000 
0.05% 
4,000 
4,000 
Narramore Estates 
36,000 
0.25% 
20,000 
18,000 
Norte Vista 
11,900 
0.08% 
7,000 
6,000 
Northern Addition 
26,000 
0.18% 
15,000 
14,000 
Painted Rock 
37,100 
0.26% 
21,000 
19,000 
Parkplace at Buckeye 
162,000 
1.12% 
91,000 
84,000 
Parkside at Buckeye 
8,600 
0.06% 
5,000 
5,000 
Parkview Manor 
9,000 
0.06% 
5,000 
5,000 
Ragsdale-Simmons Re-Plat 
900 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Rio Sendero 
45,000 
0.31% 
25,000 
23,000 
Roers Multi-Family Homes 
33,100 
0.23% 
19,000 
17,000 
Shepard Estates 
29,000 
0.20% 
16,000 
15,000 
Snap Fitness 
500 
0.00% 
300 
300 
Terravista Phase 1 
49,000 
0.34% 
27,000 
25,000 
Terravista Phase 2 
47,400 
0.33% 
27,000 
25,000 
The Reserve 
157,000 
1.09% 
88,000 
81,000 
Vanity on 3rd Building Expansion 
300 
0.00% 
200 
200 
Watson Addition 
8,000 
0.06% 
4,000 
4,000 
White Fence Farms 
35,800 
0.25% 
20,000 
18,000 
Wingate 
172,000 
1.19% 
96,000 
88,000 
Wingate East 
104,300 
0.72% 
58,000 
53,000 
Wurts Place 
2,000 
0.01% 
1,000 
1,000 
Total 
3,052,800  
21.11% 
1,710,400 
1,579,400

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
 
APPENDIX 4A 
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MODEL 
RESULTS

!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
Zone 7
Zone 6
Sun City
Festival
Well #2
Sun City
Festival
Well #1
Sun City
Festival
Well #3
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
0.25
0.13
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4A.1  Sun City Festival Peak Hour Demand Pressures and Velocities
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
Peak Hour Demand Junction
Pressures (psi)
< 50
50 - 80
80 - 110
> 110
Peak Hour Demand Pipe
Velocities (ft/s)
0 - 1
1 - 2.5
2.5 - 5
> 5
Pressure Zones
6
7
2025 BUCKEYE INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
Zone 3
Zone 4
Tartesso
Well #1
Tartesso
Well #2
Tartesso
Well #3
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
1,000
500
Feet
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4A.2  Tartesso Peak Hour Demand Pressures and Velocities
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
Peak Hour Demand Junction
Pressures (psi)
< 50
50 - 80
80 - 110
> 110
Peak Hour Demand Pipe
Velocities (ft/s)
0 - 1
1 - 2.5
2.5 - 5
> 5
Pressure Zones
3
4
2025 BUCKEYE INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
Zone 3
Zone 4
Tartesso
Well #1
Tartesso
Well #2
Tartesso
Well #3
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
1,000
500
Feet
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4A.3  Tartesso Peak Hour Demand Pressures and Velocities with Proposed PRVs
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
Peak Hour Demand Junction
Pressures (psi)
< 50
50 - 80
80 - 110
> 110
Peak Hour Demand Pipe
Velocities (ft/s)
0 - 1
1 - 2.5
2.5 - 5
> 5
Pressure Zones
3
4
2025 BUCKEYE INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã !ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
U
T"
=)
3
Q
3
Q
3
Q
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Perryville Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
Zone 3
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 3
Zone 4
Sundance
North Airport
Jackie A.
Meck WC
Last Revised: October 30, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch02\
O
0
1
0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: City of Buckeye.
Figure 4A.4  Central Buckeye Peak Hour Demand Pressures and Velocities
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
3
Q
Water Campus or WTP
U
T"
=)
Storage & Booster
Pump
!ã
Well
Peak Hour Demand Junction
Pressures (psi)
< 50
50 - 80
80 - 110
> 110
Peak Hour Demand Pipe
Velocities (ft/s)
0 - 1
1 - 2.5
2.5 - 5
> 5
Pressure Zones
1
2
3
4
2025 BUCKEYE INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
 
APPENDIX 5A 
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 
MODEL RESULTS

N 291st Ave
N
29
6
t
h
A
v
e
Sun Valley Pkw
y
W
Yukon D
r
Deser
t O
as
is B
lvd
W
Covey Ln
N 291st Ave
Sun Valley Pkwy
N 2
N 251st Ave
N De
s
ert Vista Blvd
N Desert Vista Blvd
W
Morro
w D
r
W Vis
ta North
Dr
W M
cRae
D
r
N 2
6
0
th
Ln
W
C
ovey L
n
Sun Valley Pkw
Sun Valley Pkwy
Copper Canyon
Golf Course
WR F
Festival WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.35
0.17
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5A.1  Sun City Festival 2040 Peak Flow Pipeline Capacity Model Results
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Max d/D
> 0.25
0.25 - 0.50
0.50 - 0.82
> 0.82

W
C
act
u
s
Rd
W
C
a
c
t
u
s
Rd
N
3
0
4
t
h
L
n
W
Indig
o
Way
S
W Teravalis Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
n Valley Pkwy
WR F
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.25
0.13
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5A.2  Floreo 2040 Peak Flow Pipeline Capacity Model Results
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Max d/D
< 0.25
0.25 - 0.50
0.50 - 0.82
> 0.82

N 3
N
3
1
5
t
h A
v
e
W
I
ndi
an S
c
hool
Rd
W Indian School Rd
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
Earll Dr
N 311th Ave
315th Ave
W Osborn Rd
Thomas
Rd
N Johnson Rd
W Camelback Rd
B
eth
any Hom
e
R
d
Bethany Home Rd
Sun Valley Pkwy
W Ta
rt
e
ss
o
P
kwy
N
Br
oo
kl
yn
Dr
N
Br
o
okly
n
Dr
W Tonopah Salome Hwy
W Thomas Rd
W Thomas Rd
Bruner Rd
N
30
3rd
A
ve
Tart
e
s
s
o
P
kwy
T
a
r
tes
so Pkwy
N Bruner Rd
Sun Valle
y Pkwy
W Tonopah Salome Hw
y
W M
cDowe
ll Rd
W McDowell Rd
T
u
rner R
d
W Indian School Rd
N 277th Ave
Power Line Rd
W McDowell Rd
W McDowell Rd
WR F
Tartesso WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
0.5
0.25
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5A.3  Tartesso 2040 Peak Flow Pipeline Capacity Model Results
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
WR F
WRF
Max d/D
> 0.25
0.25 - 0.50
0.50 - 0.82
> 0.82

10
Hassayampa
River
Dixie
Hassayampa
Arlington
Palo Verde
10
Sundance Golf
Club
Raven Golf Club
at Verrado
Skyline
Regional Park
Gila River
85
10
Robbins Butte
Wildlife Area
Valencia
Allenville
Conger
Buckeye
10
10
McMicken
Gila River
Liberty
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
"
=)
WR F
"
=)
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Camelback Rd
Bethany
Home Rd
Perryville Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow
Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby
Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo
Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson
Rd
Central WRF
Sundance WRF
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch05\
O
0
1.5
0.75
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5A.4  Central Buckeye 2040 Peak Flow Pipeline Capacity Model Results
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
Force Main
"
=)
Lift Station
WR F
WRF
Max d/D
> 0.25
0.25 - 0.50
0.50 - 0.82
> 0.82

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
 
APPENDIX 5B 
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 
CAPACITY AT BUILDOUT 
 
Will be delivered as a separate document.

2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN 
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO 
CITY OF BUCKEYE 
 
APPENDIX 5C 
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 
DEVELOPMENT FLOWS

Buckeye Developments Buildout Design Flow
Development Name
Development ID
Land Use
Area
(acres)
2025 Average Daily 
Flow
(gpd)
Buildout Average 
Daily Flow
(gpd)
Monte Verde
1
MDR/ Commercial
862
              
-
                           
1,127,000
                   
Sundance
2
MDR/ Commercial
2,067
           
1,415,000
                 
1,475,000
                   
Copper Falls
3
MDR
267
              
-
                           
164,000
                     
Westwind
4
Commercial
809
              
-
                           
919,000
                     
Silver Rock
5
MDR/ Commercial
1,280
           
-
                           
1,732,000
                   
Tartesso
6
MDR/ Commercial/ Mixed Use
7,410
           
-
                           
9,560,000
                   
Tartesso West
7
MDR/ Commercial/ Mixed Use
5,565
           
841,000
                    
8,174,000
                   
Elianto
8
MDR/ Commercial
3,897
           
-
                           
4,920,000
                   
Floreo at Terravalis
9
MDR/ Mixed Use
3,039
           
-
                           
1,797,000
                   
North Star Ranch
10
MDR/ Industrial/ Mixed Use
2,823
           
-
                           
3,247,000
                   
Festival Ranch
11
MDR
10,181
         
1,489,000
                 
3,621,000
                   
Terravalis
12
MDR/ Commercial
35,769
         
-
                           
36,206,000
                 
Henry Park
13
MDR/ Commercial
479
              
-
                           
444,000
                     
Montiere
15
MDR/ Commercial
593
              
-
                           
950,000
                     
Southwest Ranch
16
MDR/ Commercial
474
              
-
                           
837,000
                     
Sun Valley South
18
MDR/ Commercial
7,097
           
-
                           
7,536,000
                   
Desert Creek
19
MDR/ Commercial
2,232
           
-
                           
2,885,000
                   
Westpark
20
MDR/ Commercial
1,066
           
391,000
                    
962,000
                     
Blue Horizons
21
MDR/ Commercial
574
              
506,000
                    
506,000
                     
Valle Del Sol
22
MDR/ Commercial
318
              
-
                           
679,000
                     
Valle Del Rio
23
MDR/ Commercial
294
              
-
                           
552,000
                     
Cipriani
24
MDR/ Commercial
2,109
           
-
                           
3,608,000
                   
Buckeye 252
26
MDR
79
                
-
                           
85,000
                       
Parkman Ranch
27
MDR
151
              
-
                           
162,000
                     
Miller Crossings
28
Commercial
30
                
-
                           
24,000
                       
Marwest
30
Industrial
65
                
-
                           
65,000
                       
Sun Valley Villages I and II
25
MDR/ Commercial
5,815
           
-
                           
7,791,000
                   
Jackrabbit Crossing
32
Commercial
18
                
1,000
                        
2,000
                         
Paloma Vista
33
Industrial
160
              
83,000
                      
166,000
                     
Mayfield
34
MDR
144
              
-
                           
146,000
                     
Algodon
35
MDR
73
                
-
                           
225,000

burg
74
Circle City
Wittmann
Morristown
10
10
Dixie
Allenville
Palo Verde
Buckeye
60
Liberty
Monte Verde
Sundance
Copper
Falls
Westwind
Silver Rock
Tartesso
Tartesso West
Elianto
Floreo
at Teravalis
North Star
Ranch
Festival
Ranch
Teravalis
Henry Park
Verrado
Montiere
Sienna Hills
Sun
Valley South
Desert Creek
Westpark
Blue Horizons
Valle
Del
Sol
Valle
Del
Rio
Cipriani
Buckeye
252
Parkman Ranch
Miller
Crossings
Mountain View
Business
Center
Marwest
Sun Valley
Villages
I and II
Former Cemex Sand
and Gravel Quarry
Jackrabbit
Crossing
Paloma Vista
Mayfield
Algodon
Beloat Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower
Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian
School Rd
Camelback Rd
Bethany
Home Rd
Glendale Ave
Northern Ave
Olive Ave
Peoria Ave
Cactus Ave
Waddell Rd
Greenway Rd
Bell Rd
Union
Hills Dr
Beardsley Rd
Deer
Valley Rd
Pinnacle Peak
Perryville Rd
195th Ave
Airport Rd
Dean Rd
Rainbow Rd
Watson Rd
Apache Rd
Miller Rd
Rooks Rd
Oglesby Rd
Turner Rd
Wilson Ave
Palo Verde Rd
Bruner Rd
Johnson Rd
Last Revised: October 31, 2025 pw:\\IO-PW-INT.Carollo.local:Carollo_200000\Documents\AZ\Buckeye\203415-000000\03 Reports and Studies\02 Deliverables\ch03\
O
0
3
1.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.
Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.
Data Sources: ESRI, City of Buckeye
2025 INTEGRATED WATER MASTER PLAN
NOVEMBER 2025 / FINAL / CAROLLO
Figure 5C.1  Buckeye Developments
CITY OF BUCKEYE
Legend
MP Communities
Buckeye Planning Area