Buckeye TMP_FINAL_251210.pdf
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
639310 characters
City of Buckeye Transportation Master Plan Update December 2025 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Transportation Master Plan Adopted December 2025 Prepared for: City of Buckeye Engineering Department 530 East Monroe Avenue Buckeye, AZ 85236 Prepared by: Wilson & Company 410 North 44th Street, Suite 460 Phoenix, AZ 85008 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Transportation Master Plan Organization ..................................................................................... 3 1.2 A Vision for Growth ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 A Vision for a Multimodal System ................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Planning Area ................................................................................................................................ 6 Regional Setting .................................................................................................................................... 6 Local Setting .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Surrounding Jurisdictions ...................................................................................................................... 9 Related Plans and Studies ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.5 Plan Development Process .......................................................................................................... 12 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan process and Policies .................................................................. 14 Public Involvement Process .................................................................................................................... 17 TMP Specific Survey Questions ........................................................................................................... 17 Results ................................................................................................................................................. 18 Map Atlas ................................................................................................................................................ 20 1.6 Key issues .................................................................................................................................... 21 Planning for Growth ............................................................................................................................ 21 Economic Development ...................................................................................................................... 24 Regionally Significant Corridors .......................................................................................................... 24 Multimodal Options ............................................................................................................................ 24 Maintaining Transportation Infrastructure ......................................................................................... 25 2. Street Plan ........................................................................................................................................... 26 2.1 Existing Street Network ............................................................................................................... 27 Existing Street Configuration ............................................................................................................... 28 Existing Street Classifications .............................................................................................................. 30 Existing Jurisdictional Responsibility ................................................................................................... 31 Existing Crash Data .............................................................................................................................. 36 2.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan ........................................................................................... 38 2.3 Multimodal Integration ............................................................................................................... 40 2.4 Relevant Street Plans .................................................................................................................. 40 MCDOT Transportation System Plan 2040 .......................................................................................... 40 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan .............................................................................................. 41 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN MCDOT Transportation Improvement Program .................................................................................. 41 ADOT Long-Range Transportation Plan ............................................................................................... 42 ADOT I-11 and Intermountain West Study .......................................................................................... 43 ADOT I-11 Environmental Impact Statement ...................................................................................... 44 MAG 1-10 / Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study ............................................................. 46 MAG I-8 / Hidden Valley Transportation Study ................................................................................... 46 MAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (MOMENTUM 2050) .......................................................... 46 MAG Transportation Improvement Program ...................................................................................... 49 2.5 Street Design ............................................................................................................................... 49 Parkway ............................................................................................................................................... 50 Principal Arterial ................................................................................................................................. 50 Major Arterial Street ........................................................................................................................... 50 Minor Arterial Street ........................................................................................................................... 50 Major Collector Street ......................................................................................................................... 50 Commercial/Industrial Collector Street .............................................................................................. 50 Minor Collector Street ........................................................................................................................ 50 Local Street.......................................................................................................................................... 50 Residential Entrance............................................................................................................................ 51 2.6 Street Network Connectivity and Multimodal Integration ......................................................... 51 Street Network Connectivity ............................................................................................................... 51 Determining Trade-offs in Multimodal Accommodation .................................................................... 53 2.7 Travel Demand Modeling ............................................................................................................ 54 Level of Service ................................................................................................................................... 54 Existing Conditions (2023) ................................................................................................................... 55 Buildout Conditions (Post 2050) ......................................................................................................... 55 Scenario 1: Buildout Network with Circulation Master Plan and City Updates .................................. 58 Scenario 2: Buildout Network with Bruner Road Interchange and Yuma Road Realignment............. 58 2.8 Street Network Recommendations ............................................................................................. 63 Future Street Classifications ................................................................................................................ 63 Future Street Configuration ................................................................................................................ 65 Future Jurisdictional Responsibility .................................................................................................... 66 2.9 Street Implementation and Funding ........................................................................................... 68 Funding ............................................................................................................................................... 68 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Implementation .................................................................................................................................. 69 2.10 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 69 3. Wildlife ................................................................................................................................................ 70 3.1 Regional Wildlife Habitats and Species ....................................................................................... 71 3.2 Key Wildlife Corridors in the Buckeye Region: ............................................................................ 71 3.2.1 White Tank Mountains–Belmont Mountains Corridor ........................................................ 71 3.2.2 Gila River Corridor (Buckeye Hills–Sierra Estrella Mountains) ............................................ 72 3.2.3 Belmont–Saddle–Gila Bend Mountains Corridor ................................................................ 72 3.2.4 Hassayampa River–Vulture Mountains Corridor ................................................................. 72 3.2.5 Wagner Wash Corridor ........................................................................................................ 72 3.3 Imagine Buckeye General Plan .................................................................................................... 72 3.4 Conceptual Wildlife Linkages ...................................................................................................... 74 4. Transit .................................................................................................................................................. 75 4.1 Existing Transit Service ................................................................................................................ 76 Regional Route 563 ............................................................................................................................. 76 Regional Route 685 ............................................................................................................................. 78 Local Route 685 circulator ................................................................................................................... 78 Ride Hail and Rideshare ...................................................................................................................... 78 4.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan ........................................................................................... 79 4.3 Multimodal integration ............................................................................................................... 80 4.4 Relevant local and regional transit plans .................................................................................... 80 2016 Buckeye Transit Plan ................................................................................................................... 80 Designing Transit Accessible Communities Study ............................................................................... 82 Regional Transit Framework Study Update ......................................................................................... 83 Southwest Valley Local Transit System Study ...................................................................................... 83 Commuter Rail System Study .............................................................................................................. 84 Summary of Local and Regional Transit Plans ..................................................................................... 85 Factors Influencing Transit Demand .................................................................................................... 86 Population and Employment Density ................................................................................................. 86 Socioeconomic Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 87 Travel Demand and Traffic ................................................................................................................... 87 Land Use Activity ................................................................................................................................. 87 Transit Service Frequency ................................................................................................................... 88 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Transit Stop Accessibility ..................................................................................................................... 88 4.5 Service and Route Recommendations ........................................................................................ 89 Rapid Bus Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 90 Local Bus and High Capacity Transit Recommendations ..................................................................... 91 Carpool and Vanpool Program Recommendations ............................................................................. 91 4.6 Transit Stop Recommendations .................................................................................................. 92 Local Bus Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 92 Park-N-Ride Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 92 Transit Center Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 93 4.7 Transit Implementation and Funding .......................................................................................... 93 Funding ............................................................................................................................................... 93 Implementation .................................................................................................................................. 94 4.8 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 95 5. Active Transportation .......................................................................................................................... 96 5.1 Existing Active Transportation Facilities ...................................................................................... 97 On-Street Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................................................. 99 Off-Street Facilities ............................................................................................................................ 100 Sidewalks ........................................................................................................................................... 100 5.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan ......................................................................................... 101 5.3 Multimodal Integration ............................................................................................................. 104 5.4 Relevant Active Transportation Plans ........................................................................................ 104 Buckeye At Play Parks and Recreation Master Plan, 2025 ................................................................ 105 City of Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan ........................................................................... 108 MCDOT Active Transportation Plan ................................................................................................... 111 MAG Active Transportation Plan ....................................................................................................... 113 5.5 Factors Influencing Active Transportation ................................................................................. 113 Healthy Community Indicators ......................................................................................................... 113 Latent Demand for Active Transportation ......................................................................................... 114 Active Transportation Trip Types ....................................................................................................... 114 Bicycle and Pedestrian Friendly Communities .................................................................................. 114 5.6 Active Transportation Recommendations ................................................................................. 117 On-Street Facilities ............................................................................................................................ 117 Off-Street Facilities ............................................................................................................................ 117 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Supporting Facilities .......................................................................................................................... 118 5.7 Implementation and Funding .................................................................................................... 118 Implementation ................................................................................................................................ 118 Funding ............................................................................................................................................. 119 5.8 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 121 6. Aviation ............................................................................................................................................. 122 6.1 Existing Airports and Military Installations ............................................................................... 123 Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport ......................................................................................... 123 Buckeye Municipal Airport ................................................................................................................ 123 Luke Air Force Base ........................................................................................................................... 126 Phoenix Goodyear Airport ................................................................................................................ 127 Other Air Facilities ............................................................................................................................. 127 6.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan ......................................................................................... 127 Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan Update ............................................................................... 127 Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center................................................................................... 128 6.3 Multimodal Integration ............................................................................................................. 129 6.4 Previous Aviation Plans ............................................................................................................. 130 Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan ........................................................................................... 130 Buckeye Municipal Airport Noise Compatibility Study ..................................................................... 131 6.5 Aviation Plan Recommendations .............................................................................................. 131 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan Recommendations .................................................................. 131 Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan Recommendations ............................................................ 132 Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study Recommendations ................................... 139 6.6 Aviation Implementation and Funding ..................................................................................... 139 Funding ............................................................................................................................................. 140 Implementation ................................................................................................................................ 141 6.7 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 143 7. Rail ..................................................................................................................................................... 144 7.1 Existing Rail Facilities ................................................................................................................. 145 7.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan ......................................................................................... 147 Promoting Employment, Industrial, and Compatible Land Uses ...................................................... 147 Expanded Regional Rail Connectivity ................................................................................................ 147 7.3 Multimodal Integration ............................................................................................................. 148 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 7.4 Relevant Rail Plans .................................................................................................................... 148 Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study .................................................................................. 148 Hassayampa Valley Rail Corridors Cost Analysis Update .................................................................. 149 Commuter Rail System Study ............................................................................................................ 150 ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan ............................................................................................................ 151 ADOT Passenger Rail Study: Tucson to Phoenix ................................................................................ 155 7.5 Rail Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 157 Commuter Rail .................................................................................................................................. 157 Rail Crossings ..................................................................................................................................... 157 Wellton Branch Rehabilitation .......................................................................................................... 160 7.6 Rail Implementation and Funding ............................................................................................. 160 Funding ............................................................................................................................................. 160 Implementation ................................................................................................................................ 161 7.7 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 163 8. Freight ............................................................................................................................................... 164 8.1 Existing Freight Facilities ........................................................................................................... 165 Truck Freight ...................................................................................................................................... 165 Rail Freight ........................................................................................................................................ 167 Airport Freight ................................................................................................................................... 167 8.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan ......................................................................................... 168 Preferred Truck Corridors .................................................................................................................. 168 Freight in Relation to Economic Development ................................................................................. 169 8.3 Multimodal Integration ............................................................................................................. 169 8.4 Relevant Freight Plans ............................................................................................................... 170 Regional Freight Network Transportation Plan ................................................................................. 170 MAG MOMENTUM Regional Transportation Plan ............................................................................ 171 ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan ............................................................................................................ 171 MAG Truck Parking Study .................................................................................................................. 171 8.5 Freight Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 171 Truck Freight Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 173 Rail Freight Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 174 Air Freight Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 175 8.6 Freight Implementation and Funding ....................................................................................... 175 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Funding ............................................................................................................................................. 175 Implementation ................................................................................................................................ 176 8.7 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 177 9. Intelligent Transportation Systems .................................................................................................... 178 9.1 Existing ITS Infrastructure ......................................................................................................... 179 9.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan ......................................................................................... 179 9.3 Multimodal Integration ............................................................................................................. 181 9.4 Relevant ITS Plan ....................................................................................................................... 182 2018 ITS Strategic Plan for the City of Buckeye ................................................................................ 182 9.5 ITS recommendations ............................................................................................................... 183 Priority Corridors ............................................................................................................................... 183 Traffic Signals ..................................................................................................................................... 185 ITS Devices ........................................................................................................................................ 185 9.6 ITS Implementation and Funding .............................................................................................. 186 Local Funding .................................................................................................................................... 186 Regional Funding ............................................................................................................................... 186 State Funding .................................................................................................................................... 186 9.7 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 186 10. Recommendations and Implementation ...................................................................................... 187 10.1 Timeframes ............................................................................................................................... 187 Short-term Improvements ................................................................................................................ 187 Programmed Improvements ............................................................................................................. 188 Mid-term Improvements................................................................................................................... 188 Long-term Improvements ................................................................................................................. 188 10.2 Cost Estimating .......................................................................................................................... 210 Streets ............................................................................................................................................... 210 Transit ................................................................................................................................................ 211 Active Transportation ........................................................................................................................ 211 Aviation ............................................................................................................................................. 211 Rail ..................................................................................................................................................... 211 Freight ............................................................................................................................................... 211 ITS ...................................................................................................................................................... 211 10.3 Responsible Parties ................................................................................................................... 211 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN City of Buckeye .................................................................................................................................. 212 Arizona Department of Transportation ............................................................................................. 212 Maricopa Association of Governments ............................................................................................. 212 Maricopa County Department of Transportation ............................................................................. 212 Union Pacific Railroad ....................................................................................................................... 213 Valley Metro ...................................................................................................................................... 213 10.4 Funding Sources ........................................................................................................................ 213 Appendix A: City of Buckeye National Community Survey Appendix B: Map Atlas Appendix C: Existing and Future Roadway Network Table BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN List of Figures Figure 1-1. Integrated Transportation System .............................................................................................. 6 Figure 1-2. Buckeye’s Regional Setting .......................................................................................................... 7 Figure 1-3. Regional Vicinity .......................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 1-4. Buckeye Study Area................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 1-5. Buckeye Transportation Master Plan process ........................................................................... 13 Figure 1-6. Ranking Counts for Question 1 ................................................................................................. 18 Figure 1-7. Frequency of 1st Ranked Option for all Respondents ............................................................... 19 Figure 1-8. Ranking Counts for Question 2 ................................................................................................. 19 Figure 1-9. Frequency of 2nd Ranked Option for all Respondents ............................................................... 20 Figure 1-10. Population Density .................................................................................................................. 22 Figure 1-11. Employment Density ............................................................................................................... 23 Figure 2-1. Modes of Transportation .......................................................................................................... 27 Figure 2-2. Existing Lane Configuration ....................................................................................................... 29 Figure 2-3. Relationship between Street Classifications and Mobility ........................................................ 30 Figure 2-4. Existing City Classification ......................................................................................................... 32 Figure 2-5. ADOT Functional Classification ................................................................................................. 33 Figure 2-6. MAG Facility Type ..................................................................................................................... 34 Figure 2-7. Agency Responsibility ............................................................................................................... 35 Figure 2-8. All Crash Density ....................................................................................................................... 36 Figure 2-9. Fatal and Serious Injury Crash Locations................................................................................... 38 Figure 2-10. Functional Classification of MCDOT roadways from the MCDOT TSP 2040 ........................... 41 Figure 2-11. Statewide Recommended Investment .................................................................................... 43 Figure 2-12. MAG Recommended Investment ............................................................................................ 43 Figure 2-13. ADOT I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS (Buckeye Area Only) ........................................................ 45 Figure 2-14. MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study, Recommended Transportation Framework ..... 47 Figure 2-15. Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study Recommended Framework ........................ 48 Figure 2-16. MAG RTP Recommended Corridors ........................................................................................ 48 Figure 2-17. Street Network Connectivity ................................................................................................... 52 Figure 2-18. Component Parts of a Street .................................................................................................. 53 Figure 2-19. Level of Service Concept ......................................................................................................... 55 Figure 2-20. (2023) Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................ 56 Figure 2-21. 2023 Level of Service .............................................................................................................. 57 Figure 2-22. Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan ....................................................................................... 59 Figure 2-23. Scenario 1: Buildout Network with Circulation Master Plan and City Updates ...................... 60 Figure 2-24. Scenario 2: Buildout Network with Bruner Road Interchange and Yuma Road Realignment 61 Figure 2-25. Scenario 3: Buildout Network with Scenario 2 Changes and Principal Arterials .................... 62 Figure 2-26. Future Street Network by City Classification .......................................................................... 64 Figure 2-27. Future Street Network by Agency Responsibility ................................................................... 67 Figure 4-1. Existing Transit Service .............................................................................................................. 77 Figure 4-2. Recommended Circulator Alternative with Stop Locations ...................................................... 81 Figure 4-3. Local Route Extensions ............................................................................................................. 82 Figure 4-4. SWVLTSS Long-range transit service plan ................................................................................. 84 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Figure 4-5. Estrella Line Corridor Railroad Facilities .................................................................................... 85 Figure 4-6. Factors Influencing Transit Demand .......................................................................................... 86 Figure 4-7. Transit Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................ 90 Figure 5-1 Existing Active Transportation Facilities ..................................................................................... 98 Figure 5-2. Existing and Potential Bike Routes .......................................................................................... 106 Figure 5-3. Off-Street – Paths and Trails .................................................................................................... 107 Figure 5-4. Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Pathways & Trails Classifications and Guidelines ............ 109 Figure 5-5. Planned Primary and Secondary Trail Network ...................................................................... 110 Figure 5-6. MCDOT Active Transportation Plan: Pedestrian Network Needs ........................................... 112 Figure 5-7. MCDOT Active Transportation Plan: Bicycle Network Needs ................................................. 112 Figure 5-8. Bicycle and Pedestrian Involved Crash Locations ................................................................... 116 Figure 6-1. Existing Airports ...................................................................................................................... 124 Figure 6-2. Existing Buckeye Municipal Airport ........................................................................................ 125 Figure 6-3. Aviation Plan Recommendations ............................................................................................ 134 Figure 6-4. Development Staging of Buckeye Municipal Airport Capital Improvement Program ............ 135 Figure 6-5. Buckeye Municipal Airport Total Revenue v. Expenses ........................................................... 140 Figure 7-1. Existing Rail Facilities............................................................................................................... 146 Figure 7-2. Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study – Study Area .................................................. 149 Figure 7-3. MAG Commuter Rail System 2040 Daily Boardings by Station ............................................... 150 Figure 7-4. ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan – Arizona Spine Corridor of Opportunity ................................. 152 Figure 7-5. ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan – Sunset Route Corridor of Opportunity .................................. 153 Figure 7-6. ADOT Passenger Rail Study: Tucson to Phoenix – Preferred Alterative .................................. 156 Figure 7-7. Rail Plan Recommendations, 2018 ......................................................................................... 158 Figure 8-1. Major Industrial Areas in Buckeye .......................................................................................... 166 Figure 8-2. MAG Regional Freight Network Report – Final Freight Network ........................................... 170 Figure 8-3. Freight Plan Recommendations .............................................................................................. 172 Figure 9-1. Existing ITS Facilities ........................................................................................................ 180 Figure 9-2. ITS Plan Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 184 Figure 10-1. Programmed Transportation Improvements in Buckeye MPA .............................................. 188 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN List of Tables Table 1-1. Related Plans and Studies .......................................................................................................... 11 Table 1-2. Total Population Per Year ............................................................................................................ 21 Table 1-3. Total Employment Per Year ........................................................................................................ 23 Table 2-1. High and Medium Crash Frequency Locations ........................................................................... 37 Table 2-2. MAG TIP Improvements in Buckeye ........................................................................................... 49 Table 2-3. Lane Configuration by City Street Classification ......................................................................... 66 Table 4-1. Existing Bus Stops ....................................................................................................................... 78 Table 4-2 Proposed Transit Hubs ................................................................................................................. 92 Table 4-3. Short-Term Transit System Recommendations ........................................................................... 94 Table 4-4. Mid-Term Transit System Recommendations ............................................................................. 95 Table 4-5. Long-Term Transit System Recommendations ........................................................................... 95 Table 5-1. Existing Active Transportation Facilities ..................................................................................... 97 Table 5-2. Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan Policy Guidance .............................................................. 104 Table 5-3. MCDOT Active Transportation Plan - Pedestrian and Bicycle Needs in Buckeye ...................... 111 Table 5-4. Active Travel Origins and Destination Locations ....................................................................... 114 Table 6-1. Total Costs by Planning Horizon – Capital Improvement Program for Buckeye Municipal Airport .................................................................................................................................................................. 132 Table 6-2. Short-Term Planning Horizon (First Five Years) – Capital Improvement Program for Buckeye Municipal Airport ...................................................................................................................................... 136 Table 6-3. Intermediate-Term Planning Horizon (6-10 Years) - Capital Improvement Program for Buckeye Municipal Airport ...................................................................................................................................... 137 Table 6-4. Long-Term Planning Horizon (11-20 Years) - Capital Improvement Program for Buckeye Municipal Airport ...................................................................................................................................... 138 Table 6-5. Buckeye Municipal Airport Revenue and Expenses from 2010-2018 ...................................... 140 Table 6-6. Short-term Aviation System Recommendations ...................................................................... 142 Table 6-7. Mid-term Aviation System Recommendations ......................................................................... 142 Table 6-8.Long-term Aviation System Recommendations ........................................................................ 142 Table 7-1. State Rail Plan – Arizona Spine Corridor Implementation Actions ........................................... 154 Table 7-2. State Rail Plan – Sunset Corridor Implementation Actions ...................................................... 155 Table 7-3. Commuter Rail Implementation Next Steps ............................................................................. 159 Table 7-4. Rail Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 159 Table 7-5. Short-term Rail System Recommendations .............................................................................. 162 Table 7-6. Mid-term Rail System Recommendations ................................................................................ 162 Table 7-7.Long-term Rail System Recommendations ................................................................................ 162 Table 8-1. Preferred Truck Corridor Recommendations ........................................................................... 174 Table 8-2. Short-term Freight Recommendations ..................................................................................... 177 Table 8-3. Mid-Term Freight Recommendations ....................................................................................... 177 Table 8-4. Long-Term Freight Recommendations ..................................................................................... 177 Table 9-1. Existing 2018 Traffic Signals ...................................................................................................... 181 Table 9-2. ITS Priority Corridors ................................................................................................................ 183 Table 9-3. Future Traffic Signal Roadways ................................................................................................. 185 Table 10-1. Programmed Transportation Improvements in Buckeye MPA ............................................... 189 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Table 10-2. Street Network Unit Costs ...................................................................................................... 210 Table 10-3. Annual Street Maintenance Costs .......................................................................................... 211 Table 10-4. Funding Sources ..................................................................................................................... 214 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 1 1. Introduction The Buckeye 2025 Transportation Master Plan (TMP) represents an update to the previous TMP, adopted in 2019. The update addresses changing land uses and investment priorities that have occurred since adoption of the 2019 Plan as the City’s population continues to grow and new businesses are locating in the community. The TMP is a planning tool to guide the City’s future transportation needs based on Buckeye’s ultimate buildout condition, when all development proposed in the adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan Future Land Use Plan has been completed. The TMP provides recommended multimodal transportation improvements to accommodate growth within Buckeye’s Municipal Planning Area (MPA). Based on the existing and forecasted conditions for Buckeye, the TMP establishes a strategy for the development of a comprehensive transportation network that efficiently serves multiple modes of transportation including the street network, transit services, active transportation facilities, aviation, rail, and freight. The TMP was developed as an implementation strategy of the City’s Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan allowing for a seamless link between land use and transportation infrastructure decisions for the City. Ultimately, the TMP identifies short-term, mid-term, and long-term priorities for the transportation system. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 2 The TMP addresses infrastructure needs that exist in 2025 as well as future needs aligned with future land use and development patterns. The TMP provides long-term guidance for the planning of roadway, transit, and non-motorized transportation improvements during the buildout of the City’s transportation network. The Buckeye TMP has two defining features: Comprehensive. The TMP covers a wide range of transportation issues including roadway network characteristics, modal plans for the various transportation system users, and an implementation process. This TMP supports and acknowledges the recommendations from existing air, transit and rail plans, which are referenced throughout this TMP. Long-range. The TMP provides guidance on reaching a goal envisioned at buildout of the City. To reach this envisioned future, the TMP will include recommendations and actions that address short-, mid-, and long-term needs. There are two primary documents that are part of the Buckeye Transportation Master Plan: Map Atlas. This document provides a detailed description of the City’s existing (2025) transportation network, as well as a detailed overview of the buildout network, providing a comprehensive view of planned roadway improvements within the City of Buckeye and the City’s MPA. Transportation Master Plan. This document contains the assessment of existing and future transportation facilities and identifies infrastructure needs beginning today through the buildout of the MPA. The TMP identifies an implementation methodology that executes the goals and policies of the TMP and adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan. This Introduction Chapter includes the following sections: • Section 1.1 Transportation Master Plan Organization. The organization of chapters in the TMP. • Section 1.2 A Vision for Growth. A description of how the TMP will accommodate future growth in Buckeye. • Section 1.3 A Vision for a Multimodal System. A description of how the TMP will connect different modes of transportation. • Section 1.4 Planning Area. The regional and local setting of the planning area and the plans and studies that are relevant to this TMP. • Section 1.5 Plan Development Process. The process for how the TMP was developed, including the relationship to the adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan goals and policies, the public involvement process, and the documents that support the TMP. • Section 1.6 Key Issues. A description of the key issues that were identified during the development of the TMP. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 3 1.1 Transportation Master Plan Organization The Buckeye TMP has been organized into mode-specific plans that are divided into separate chapters. Additionally, the chapters provide the foundational information to the TMP process and guidance as to how the TMP will be implemented. The Buckeye TMP is organized into the following Chapters: • Chapter 1: Introduction: The Introduction provides an overview of the purpose of the TMP as well as the planning area, plan development process, key issues, and the TMP organization. • Chapter 2: Street Plan Chapter: The Street Plan Chapter provides guidance as to the ultimate buildout of the roadway network with a focus on vehicular mobility. • Chapter 3: Wildlife Chapter: The provides detail on the planned relationship between future development in Buckeye and the wildlife corridors in the area. • Chapter 4: Transit Chapter: The Transit Chapter provides guidance as to the potential expansion of transit service and park-n-ride facilities to support high volume origin and destination mobility throughout the planning area. Information in this chapter is currently being evaluated as part of the City’s Transit Study and, thus, not revised as part of this 2025 TMP update. • Chapter 5: Active Transportation Chapter: The Active Transportation Chapter provides guidance on the bicycle and pedestrian network to be implemented throughout the planning area, building on recommendations from the adopted 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Study. • Chapter 6: Aviation Chapter: The Aviation Chapter examines the recommendations from the recently completed Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan, guiding aviation growth in Buckeye. Information in this chapter is was recently completed as part of the City’s Aviation Area Plan and the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan and, thus, not revised as part of this 2025 TMP update. • Chapter 7: Rail Chapter: The Rail Chapter examines the recommendations from various state and regional rail plans in support of future freight and commuter rail investments. Information in this chapter will be the direct focus of a future study and, thus, not revised as part of this 2025 TMP update. • Chapter 8: Freight Chapter: The Freight Chapter examines the distribution of goods serving the broader southwest region and outlines a preferred truck route plan for the City of Buckeye. • Chapter 9: ITS Chapter: The Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Chapter examines recommendations from the ITS Strategic Plan, guiding the application of technologies, such as traffic signals, into the surface transportation system and the operations of such technologies. Information in this chapter will be the direct focus of a future study and, thus, not revised as part of this 2025 TMP update. • Chapter 10: Recommendations and Implementation: This chapter provides a planning-level implementation matrix for the recommendations identified in previous chapters. The matrix includes the project name and brief description, the anticipated implementation timeframe, the planning-level cost estimate, and the responsible party(ies). Additionally, this chapter describes the anticipated operations and maintenance of the surface transportation system. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 4 1.2 A Vision for Growth The TMP is a planning document, setting goals and implementation strategies to address the City of Buckeye’s current and future multimodal transportation needs. It identifies the ultimate transportation network when the City reaches buildout development conditions. The City’s future transportation needs are based on the ultimate buildout condition, including Buckeye’s future land uses as defined in the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan. A primary aspect of growth to consider is the entitlements granted to numerous developments through the City’s Community Master Plans (CMPs). These CMPs outline where significant growth is anticipated to occur and provide conceptual design of the transportation improvements needed to support each CMP. Understanding how much growth will occur and where in the City it is anticipated to develop is key in planning for infrastructure in a fiscally conscious manner. Similar to many communities in the Phoenix region, much of the transportation infrastructure cost is paid by the developer at the time of development. That is, the developer is required per the City Code to construct the half street improvements along their frontage, to standards set forth by the City of Buckeye. The Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) I-10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study was a transportation planning study completed in 2008 that focused on approximately 1,400 square miles in western Maricopa County, including the City of Buckeye. In 2008, the City formally adopted the I-10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study network (Hassayampa Network) as the future transportation network for the City of Buckeye. Since that time, many CMP developments have been approved, which have included anticipated changes to the future transportation network. The 2019 TMP recommended a future roadway network which combined the Hassayampa Valley Framework Study network, planned infrastructure as identified in the CMP development approvals, and Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) parkways. This 2025 TMP update builds on these previously recommended future networks, using updated population and employment projections to better plan for anticipated areas of growth. The population and employment projections are discussed further in Section 1.7 of this Chapter. The street network revisions are documented in Chapter 2 of this TMP. The TMP is a living document that is updated every 5-6 years. The recommended roadway network reflects what is needed to accommodate the currently approved zoning and CMPs throughout the City. It is understood that as market demand changes, zoning and development CMPs may as well. When a CMP amendment, and associated roadway network, is approved by City Council, the approved roadway network will become an approved amendment to the TMP. At the next update to the TMP, any approved amendments will become part of the base roadway network for the update. This TMP also assesses the transportation needs anticipated in 2050 in conformity with regional planning horizons set forth by MAG, which is further discussed in Chapter 2. Identifying regionally significant needs within the 2050 planning horizon is an important step for MAG’s air quality conformity reporting and is consequently critical for the City to be able to effectively compete for federal funding sources in the MAG region. Through this planning process, two planning horizons were utilized in modeling the travel demand in Buckeye in the future. The 2050 planning horizon was used to identify mid-term priorities for the transportation system. The buildout planning horizon was used to identify the ultimate transportation network for Buckeye. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 5 1.3 A Vision for a Multimodal System The adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan includes a strategy recommendation for the City to create a transportation network that safely accommodates all users. Therefore, an important concept for Buckeye’s future transportation system is the mobility, connectivity, and proximity of multiple modes of transportation. Within the future transportation network, each of these transportation modes should complement the other in a safe and efficient manner. Therefore, the Buckeye TMP focuses on integration with different transportation modes, while also balancing the needs of the community and the economy. Ultimately, the Buckeye TMP provides recommendations for each transportation mode considering the land use context described in the adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan, and provides a long- range vision for the following transportation system components: Streets Transit Service and Facilities Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, 2019) Airports (Airport Master Plan, ongoing) Railways (future Railway Plan to be completed) Freight Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) (future update to 2017 ITS Strategic Plan to be completed) Figure 1-1 illustrates the integrated transportation system that is the subject of this TMP. Planning for each of these modes of travel allows the City to better provide a range of transportation choices. Additionally, it allows the City to determine future capital improvement projects and funding for new infrastructure as well as ongoing maintenance and operations. Recommendations for each of these modes of travel not only support economic development and quality of life goals, but also were derived with an understanding of how each mode of travel is interrelated to other modes of travel. Due to the City’s multiple transportation system modes, it is necessary for each mode to link together to provide a multimodal network that supports efficient mobility and transportation operations. For example, the City’s street network serves multiple purposes including the movement of personal vehicles, trucks, transit vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well as providing access to the airport or across railways and canals. Pedestrian and bicycle networks are influenced by the level of vehicle traffic that impacts the ability to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. Freight planning includes a combination of truck freight (via streets), rail freight (via railways), and air freight (via the airport) which aligns with modern intermodal freight operations throughout the U.S. Lastly, ITS provides for efficient traffic management for various travel modes, allowing for safer, more coordinated, and efficient use of the transportation network. By including all modes of travel in the Buckeye TMP, the City can more effectively plan for priorities of each mode as well as the system as a whole; allowing the City to balance economic development and quality of life goals. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 6 Figure 1-1. Integrated Transportation System 1.4 Planning Area Regional Setting Located in western Maricopa County Arizona, Buckeye is positioned as the western gateway to the larger Phoenix metropolitan area. Regional access to and from Buckeye is provided by Interstate 10 (I-10), which runs east-west through central Buckeye connecting Phoenix to southern California, and State Route 85 (SR 85), which runs north-south through Buckeye connecting I-10 and Interstate 8 (I-8). I-8 begins in San Diego, runs through Gila Bend and connects to I-10 in Casa Grande. This connection allows SR 85 to act as an I-10 bypass, allowing freight traffic to avoid congestion in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Future regional connectivity will be enhanced by State Route 30 (SR 30) and Interstate 11 (I-11). SR 30, a planned east-west freeway south of I-10, will provide an alternative route for regional traffic, reducing congestion on I-10 and improving east-west mobility. I-11, which will run north-south through Buckeye, will enhance long-distance freight movement and strengthen connections between Arizona, Nevada and beyond. Buckeye is located about 35 miles west of downtown Phoenix. Buckeye is a member of the area’s Metropolitan Planning Organization, MAG. As a member of MAG, Buckeye has steadily increased its role in the region including being involved in several regional transportation studies that have identified significant investments in the Buckeye planning area. Buckeye’s location within the southwest region of the U.S. is displayed in Figure 1-2 and Buckeye’s location within the Phoenix metropolitan area is displayed in Figure 1-3. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 7 Figure 1-2. Buckeye’s Regional Setting BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 8 Figure 1-3. Regional Vicinity BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 9 Local Setting The planning area for the TMP comprises the Buckeye MPA. The MPA includes the City limits and extends beyond the City boundary to cover a larger area of influence where the City has planning jurisdiction. At approximately 640 square miles, Buckeye has the largest MPA in Maricopa County. By comparison, the City of Phoenix is 518 square miles. Currently, 392 square miles of the MPA are annexed in the City limits. The Buckeye MPA is bounded by Perryville Road on the east, 379th Avenue on the west, Woods Road on the south, and Black Mountain Road on the north. The City of Buckeye MPA includes Maricopa County islands located within the City, as well as other unincorporated areas directly adjacent to the City but under Maricopa County jurisdiction. County islands are unincorporated properties under county jurisdiction; however, they are surrounded by the City of Buckeye incorporated area. The City of Buckeye study area is shown on Figure 1-4. Surrounding Jurisdictions The City of Buckeye is part of the west Maricopa County area, commonly referred to as the ‘West Valley’. In addition to Buckeye, the West Valley is made up of Wickenburg, Goodyear, Surprise, Litchfield Park, Avondale, Tolleson, Glendale, Youngtown, El Mirage, Peoria, and Gila Bend. Given the large size of Buckeye’s MPA at approximately 640 square miles, the City is beginning to emerge as a regional leader of growth in the West Valley. Many of Buckeye’s transportation corridors extend beyond the MPA boundaries to these neighboring communities. Therefore, it will be important to consider plans of these communities and coordinate with surrounding jurisdictions as improvements are proposed to regional transportation facilities. Related Plans and Studies Various areas in the City of Buckeye have been studied in several previous transportation planning efforts. In some instances, the City transportation network was a direct focus of the planning effort, and in other instances the City was a component of a larger, regional study. Findings from these studies are valuable to this TMP as they have contributed to the development of the transportation system in place today and programmed for the future. Furthermore, reviewing previous plans and studies ensures the current assessment accounts for these past efforts and their decision-making processes. When modifications to previous recommendations are justified, they are documented as part of this TMP effort. Provided in Table 1-1 is a summary of the key plans and studies with relevance to the TMP. Publishing agencies include the City of Buckeye, MCDOT, Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), Valley Metro, and MAG. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 10 Figure 1-4. Buckeye Study Area BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 11 Table 1-1. Related Plans and Studies Publishing Agency Title Published Date City of Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update Ongoing Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan Ongoing Airport Area Plan 2023 Buckeye Capital Improvement Program FY 25 – FY29 2025 City of Buckeye Strategic Plan 2025-2028 2025 City of Buckeye 2040 General Plan 2022 Buckeye Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan 2019 Transportation Master Plan 2019 ITS Strategic Plan 2018 Maricopa Association of Governments Regional Strategic Transportation Infrastructure Investment Plan 2023 Regional Transportation Plan – Momentum 2050 2021 Strategic Transportation Safety Plan 2021 Transportation Improvement Program FY 2022-2025 2021 Active Transportation Plan 2020 Regional Transit Framework Study Update 2019 Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study 2014 I-10 (Papago Freeway)/Dean Road Interchange Feasibility Study 2014 Southwest Valley Local Transit System Study (SWVLTSS) 2013 Hassayampa Valley Rail Corridors Analysis Update 2013 Designing Transit Accessible Communities Study 2013 Commuter Rail System Study Update 2010 I-8/Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study 2009 I-10/Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study (Town of Buckeye I-10 Access Review and Evaluation) 2008 I-10/Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study 2007 Arizona DOT I-10/Jackrabbit Trail Traffic Interchange Study 2024 2050 State Long Range Transportation Plan 2023 Public Involvement Plan Update 2023 Arizona State Rail Plan 2022 I-11 Final Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement 2021 State Route 30: Loop 303 to Loop 202 Study 2020 Arizona Freight Plan 2017 Passenger Rail Study: Tucson to Phoenix 2011 Arizona State Aviation System Plan (SASP) 2008 Valley Metro Buckeye Transit Plan 2016 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 12 Publishing Agency Title Published Date Maricopa County DOT Transportation Improvement Program FY 2024 2023 White Tank/ Grand Ave Area Plan 2023 Transportation System Program (TSP) 2040 2022 Transportation System Plan 2040 2020 Daisy Mountain/ New River Area Plan Update 2019 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 2030 2016 Southern Parkway (Salome Highway to State Route 85) Feasibility Study 2014 Greenway Parkway Feasibility Study (Turner Parkway to Hassayampa Freeway) 2014 Wintersburg Parkway Feasibility Study (Salome Parkway to Turner Parkway) 2014 Wild Rose Parkway Feasibility Study (Sun Valley Parkway to US 60) 2013 Camelback Parkway Feasibility Study (Sun Valley Parkway to Tonopah Parkway) 2013 Dove Valley Parkway Feasibility Study (US 60 to Hidden Waters Parkway) 2013 Deer Valley Parkway Feasibility Study (US 60 to Wild Rose Parkway) 2012 Hidden Waters Parkway North Feasibility Study (Interstate 10 to State Route 74) 2012 Yuma Parkway Feasibility Study (Salome Highway to Palo Verde Road) 2012 Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP) Revised 2011 Northern Parkway/Tonopah Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study 2011 Hidden Waters Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study (Watermelon Road to Interstate 10) 2010 McDowell Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study (339th Avenue to Dean Road) 2010 Turner Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study (Interstate 10 to State Route 74) 2010 1.5 Plan Development Process Development of the TMP occurred over a multi-year process, starting with the adopted General Plan Update, Imagine Buckeye 2040. The TMP is a dynamic planning document, likely to result in periodic updates as new growth, demands, and technologies emerge. Figure 1-5 illustrates the planning process including the General Plan and the three phases of the Transportation Master Plan, which are: Map Atlas, Draft TMP, and Final TMP. The chapters within this TMP address streets, transit, active transportation, aviation, rail, freight, ITS, and implementation. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 13 Figure 1-5. Buckeye Transportation Master Plan process BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 14 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan process and Policies The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan was approved and ratified by voters in 2018, with subsequent amendments adopted in 2022. In the General Plan, a series of goals, policies, and implementation actions were included to guide future development in Buckeye, which includes the transportation network. The General Plan included an implementation action for completion of this study, which this TMP update continues to reinforce. The General Plan encourages multimodal mobility and a comprehensive transportation system through goals and policies, which are further expanded upon in subsequent chapters. These goals and policies served as a guiding framework for the recommendations of this TMP. The specific goals and policies of the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan are as follows: Transportation Goal 1: Buckeye is a connected community with an efficient multimodal transportation network. Policies: • The City of Buckeye will require new development to provide connectivity to existing transportation networks to provide accessibility and efficient connections to adjacent parcels, neighborhoods, Activity Centers, and the region. • New development should provide active transportation facilities, such as pedestrian paths, bike paths, and trails that enhance connectivity between community green spaces and to regional parks and the Maricopa County Trail System. • The City of Buckeye should ensure that the transportation network is managed, operated, and maintained efficiently. • The City of Buckeye should design roads for multimodal accessibility, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. • Collector streets should continue and connect community master plans to provide alternative pedestrian, bike, and transportation routes without dependency on the arterial network. • The City of Buckeye should ensure that transit options are provided to Activity Centers and other destination locations. • The City of Buckeye will support expanding capacity on the existing I-10 and SR85. • The City of Buckeye will actively promote and lobby for the expansion and development of new key transportation facilities, including commuter rail and other regional transportation opportunities. Transportation Goal 2: Buckeye has a regional approach to transportation planning. Policies: • The City of Buckeye will continue to use the adopted I-10/Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study as the base for its future roadway network. • The City of Buckeye will work to expand partnerships with ADOT, MCDOT, MAG, and adjacent municipalities when planning and funding transportation infrastructure. • The City of Buckeye should regularly update transportation plans consistent with regional objectives. • The City of Buckeye should work with MCDOT to assess the future viability of attached or detached bicycle and pedestrian paths throughout the City on county maintained facilities. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 15 • The City of Buckeye should seek intergovernmental agreements with canal districts, utility providers, and the flood control district for shared use of maintenance roads for pedestrians and bicyclists. Transportation Goal 3: Buckeye has a roadway system that is safe and efficient. Policies: • The City of Buckeye should plan for future transportation corridors by identifying and preserving adequate rights-of-way during the planning and development process. • The City of Buckeye should update the Capital Improvement Plan with needed road improvements on an annual basis. • The City of Buckeye should improve the flow of traffic by addressing missing links in the arterial network. • The City of Buckeye should designate appropriate truck routes that provide efficient connections to industrial and commercial uses and do not adversely impact residential land uses. • The City of Buckeye should continue to support the update and implementation of the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan. • New development should provide connectivity to adjacent neighborhoods to minimize arterial dependency. Transportation Goal 4: Buckeye’s multimodal system provides alternatives for modes of travel. Policies: • The City of Buckeye should integrate the regional transit system with the local Buckeye circulator services. • The City of Buckeye should continue to work with transit agencies and surrounding jurisdictions for expanded transit services. • The City of Buckeye should explore options for adding high-capacity transit, such as commuter rail. • The City of Buckeye should promote and encourage community-wide transit ridership. • The City of Buckeye should continue to provide transportation options for the elderly and special needs residents. • The City of Buckeye should continue to promote methods of air pollution reduction related to transportation, such as the Travel Reduction Program. • New developments will plan, design, and construct, where appropriate, roadways in conformance with the Future Transportation Network. • The City of Buckeye will identify and pursue dedicated transportation funding sources for all City transportation needs. • The City of Buckeye will support work to reopen the UPRR Wellton Branch. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 16 Transportation Goal 5: The Buckeye Municipal Airport is a key growth center and protected from encroachment. Policies: • The City of Buckeye should continue to support the expansion of operations at the Buckeye Municipal Airport in close coordination with Luke AFB. • Proposed land uses and development proposals will be consistent with the 2007 Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan. • Multimodal connections should be provided to the Buckeye Municipal Airport. • The City of Buckeye will improve public awareness of the airport through public outreach and education campaigns. • The City of Buckeye should expand telecommunications at the airport to support “state of the art” technology, such as wireless internet access and fiber optics. • The City of Buckeye will support work to extend the runway at Buckeye Municipal Airport in close coordination with Luke AFB. Transportation Goal 6: The bicycle and pedestrian circulation system is a well-connected and maintained network, enabling access to all parts of the City. Policies: • The City of Buckeye should reference its own Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, along with the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan, for guidance. Additionally, MAG’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan can serve as a supplementary resource to ensure regional connectivity and alignment with broader planning efforts. • The City of Buckeye will promote the development of a comprehensive and safe system of recreational and commuter bicycle routes that provide access to key destinations, including community facilities (such as schools, libraries, and parks), shopping areas, jobs, and activity centers, with appropriate linkages to neighborhoods. • The City of Buckeye should connect parks to planned bicycle routes and recreation corridors, including trails, such as along the Hassayampa River, Gila River, Skyline Park and White Tank Mountains Regional Park. • The City of Buckeye will develop a multimodal policy that supports all modes of transportation and addresses the inclusion of pedestrian and bicycling facilities in new and existing road corridors, where appropriate. • The City of Buckeye should provide bicycle access in and near Activity Centers, neighborhoods, community centers, parks, and other appropriate destinations. • The City of Buckeye will require new development to provide and maintain appropriate bicycle infrastructure such as bicycle racks, lockers, lanes, and paths. • The City of Buckeye should ensure that streets in Activity Centers support high levels of pedestrian activity. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 17 Public Involvement Process Public and stakeholder input is essential to the creation of the TMP and results in a plan that is consensus-based with feasible solutions. On December 15, 2023, the City of Buckeye funded research for The National Community Survey (included as Appendix A), launching an online survey that remained open for two weeks. This survey was comprised of residents’ perspectives gathered from over 592 respondents; this does not account for additional mailed surveys that were received. The survey questioned residents’ perceptions of the current transportation systems, safety, and network sustainability. Questions focused on mobility and overall quality of transportation systems. The National Community Survey complied respondents’ results indicating only 25 percent satisfaction with the “overall quality of transportation system needs”. 74 percent of survey respondents indicated that the Buckeye community should focus on “overall quality of the transportation system” in the coming years. TMP Specific Survey Questions An online survey specific to this Transportation Master Plan update was made available from June 2024 through the end of August 2024. The survey provided a short summary of the Buckeye Transportation Plan and its importance in guiding the future funding of the community transportation system. Questions contained a list of services for proposed improvements to the overall quality of the systems in Buckeye and respondents were asked to rank improvements according to preference of priority. Survey questions can be seen below. Question 1: BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 18 Question 2: Results The Buckeye Transportation Master Plan Update Public Engagement Survey had a total of 709 responses within the two-month period. The survey concludes that respondents generally support transportation system updates in the City of Buckeye. Question 1 Response Figure 1-6. Ranking Counts for Question 1 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 19 47 percent of survey respondents selected Roadway Congestion and Delays as their preferred improvement projects that would add to the overall quality of transportation systems in Buckeye (Figure 1-7). The chart below displays the options that would most improve the overall quality of systems and the frequency it was selected as first-choice rankings. Figure 1-7. Frequency of 1st Ranked Option for all Respondents Question 2 Responses: Figure 1-8. Ranking Counts for Question 2 The results for question 2 (Figure 1-9) indicate more than half of the respondents, 56 percent, ranked Street Capacity Projects: new streets and lanes as the preferred option that will contribute to improved transportation systems in Buckeye. The chart below displays the percentage of surveyors and their first- choice rankings. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 20 Figure 1-9. Frequency of 2nd Ranked Option for all Respondents Map Atlas The Buckeye TMP began with a review and analysis of the existing conditions within the MPA. This was done through the creation of a TMP Map Atlas (Appendix B). The Map Atlas was designed to summarize the existing and future conditions of Buckeye in a concise graphic format. Several topics that influence transportation planning are explored including population, employment, land use, environmental features, and transportation network characteristics. Therefore, the Map Atlas provides foundational information regarding existing and future conditions within the City of Buckeye, which was used in developing this 2025 TMP update. Information from the Map Atlas was used in assessing future travel flows, resulting in recommended refinements to the Future Circulation Element from the Buckeye General Plan, as detailed in the TMP chapters contained herein. The section that follows provides an overview of the key issues identified through a combination of stakeholder involvement and transportation analysis. The TMP Map Atlas includes maps that illustrate key information from each chapter of the Plan and are displayed in Appendix B. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 21 1.6 Key issues Key transportation issues were identified during the TMP development process. These issues included planning for growth, economic development, regionally significant corridors, multimodal options, and maintaining transportation infrastructure. While these issues may continue to evolve in the future, it was important to consider these issues when developing recommended strategies for the future transportation network. Planning for Growth The City of Buckeye and the West Valley communities have experienced rapid growth over the last 20 or more years - Buckeye is currently one of the fastest growing cities in the nation. Developers have been drawn to Buckeye because of affordable land and proximity to nearby job markets in the neighboring West Valley communities and recently within the City of Buckeye. Increases in travel demand are an effect of population and employment growth. Existing socioeconomic conditions, including population, dwelling unit, and employment within the City, was obtained from MAG. Additionally, projections for these metrics through 2050 were obtained from MAG. While MAG projections are official figures, it is important to note that actual growth for a city is influenced by many factors and may vary from this value. Growth in Population and Dwelling Units Base year population and employment data is derived from the 2023 MAG socioeconomic data. This information is used to project total population into the future, which will be indicative of future transportation demands. Identifying where these clusters of population are located in Buckeye is important for planning future growth and development. As noted in the adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan, the MPA population is expected to grow by 283,300 people by 2050. The increased population density will make it necessary to plan for high intensity and density areas throughout the City. Table 1-2 below lists the total population in 2023, the anticipated total population in 2050, and expected total population at buildout. As shown on Table 1-2, total population is projected to increase by over 300 percent between 2050 and buildout. Table 1-2. Total Population Per Year 2023 2050 Buildout 131,800 people 415,100 people 1,768,000 people Source: MAG 2023 The total population density for all three timeframes are shown Figure 1-10 on the following page. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 22 Figure 1-10. Population Density In 2023, the highest concentration of population was in the Verrado area as well as surrounding the downtown area and south of I-10 along Yuma Road. By 2050, the highest population will be within the downtown area, with increasing totals on both the north and south sides of I-10 east of SR 85. The City’s population is also anticipated to spread north along Sun Valley Parkway. Population will continue to increase past 2050. At buildout, the greatest population is anticipated to be located north of Beardsley Road within the CMPs that are planned within this area. The buildout projections indicate that the highest population will be located north of I-10 along Sun Valley Parkway, and within the CMPs, with high concentrations in Tartesso, Teravalis, and Festival Ranch. In addition, high concentrations of population are displayed near the proposed Verrado development. While there will be a population concentration south of I-10 and north of the Gila River, the total population will not be as great as the areas north of I-10. Although the majority of the highest concentration of population is projected to be within the CMPs, there is also population growth anticipated surrounding the CMPs. Growth in Employment Strongly linked to population growth is employment growth. As populations increase, so do commercial developments that create jobs. Furthermore, cities often experience additional non-commercial job growth in the areas of manufacturing, industry, and logistics. Buckeye will experience significant employment growth due to proximity to the interstate system. Specifically, the City of Buckeye is regionally connected through I-10 and SR 85, making the City a gateway into the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. The addition of future regional roadways will further support economic opportunities and the expansion of industry in the City. Employment projections indicate the City of Buckeye will continue to grow considerably in future years. Table 1-3 lists the total employment for 2023, 2050, and buildout. The table indicates that the City will experience increased employment growth that generally aligns with the population growth. From 2050 to buildout, total employment is projected to increase by almost 500 percent. Similar to population density growth, this employment growth will increase demand for transportation options for commuting to and from the workplace and for the delivery of goods and services. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 23 Table 1-3. Total Employment Per Year 2023 2050 Buildout 13,800 jobs 93,200 jobs 556,900 jobs Source: MAG 2023 Understanding where employment growth will occur is important for planning connections in the transportation network. Figure 1-11 shows where the concentration of jobs will be located for all three timeframes. In 2023, employment was highest in the area south of I-10 and east of SR 85. The greatest employment was along the intersection of Watson Road and Yuma Road. By 2050, it is projected that employment will spread along the south side of the I-10 corridor with other concentration north of I-10, along McDowell Road, Sun Valley Parkway, and in the east corner of the planning area along Jackrabbit Trail. There is also anticipation for employment to increase along the north and south sides of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) rail line. At buildout, it is anticipated that employment will be concentrated in the area south of I-10 and north of the Gila River. Jobs are also projected to be prominent by Patton Road. Other areas where employment will be growing is Patterson Road, Sun Valley Parkway, and in the Teravalis CMP (shown below in Figure 1-11). Figure 1-11. Employment Density The projected geographical location of population and employment growth was used to determine where there are gaps in the current transportation network and how the future network can provide additional connectivity to these clusters. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 24 Economic Development Economic development is paramount in achieving the vision for growth in Buckeye. Existing developments are concentrated along Interstate 10 (I-10) as well as State Route 85 (SR 85). Both highways will continue to provide regional connectivity to Buckeye’s Activity Centers, supporting economic development. Because both highways are limited to the central and southern end of the City of Buckeye, Parkways and Arterial roadways will play a significant role in economic development in the northern end of Buckeye until future regional roadways are developed. Furthermore, localized improvements to freight facilities, including preferred truck corridors and enhanced rail crossings are addressed in this TMP. Regionally Significant Corridors There are three existing regionally significant corridors that traverse the Buckeye MPA: I-10, SR 85, and Sun Valley Parkway. Until future freeways are constructed, Sun Valley Parkway will serve as a spine for regional mobility and will connect to adjacent roadways that serve in expanding economic development opportunities in northern Buckeye. There are other major corridors that are planned to run through Buckeye, such as I-11, SR 30, and a supporting network of Parkways and Arterials that make up the Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Network. Additionally, there are various needs associated with the existing transportation network in Buckeye. The most apparent of which is a lack of connectivity and roadway capacity, particularly in the area between I- 10, MC 85, SR 85, and Perryville Road. Furthermore, many of these same corridors have high crash incidences that may be addressed through engineering solutions. Looking to the future, as the community continues to grow, the planning for regional facilities including Arterials, Parkways, I-11, and SR 30 will become an increasingly critical issue. Planning for the addition of these corridors is key to ensure that there is connectivity to the larger region, expanding the City’s economic development market area. Several of these regionally significant corridors are currently being studied by partnering agencies, and the City of Buckeye has been an active partner in these planning efforts. These studies were evaluated for this TMP and were instrumental in creating recommendations for the future Buckeye transportation network. Multimodal Options In Buckeye, there are currently limited multimodal options that expand beyond personal vehicles. While there are some multimodal facilities, there is a lack of consistent connectivity between the northern and southern ends of the City. Several designated bicycle routes exist throughout the City; however, most of these routes are located on ADOT or MCDOT-owned roadways and do not provide a contiguous network for bicycle or pedestrian users to safely navigate through the City. Currently, two Valley Metro bus routes serve Buckeye, providing both local circulator and regional connector services. These routes offer public transportation to portions of the City, connecting Buckeye to neighboring municipalities to the east and Gila Bend to the south. As the City continues to grow and as developments that generate transit trips are introduced, expansion of the existing transit system will be an important consideration. However, much of this will depend upon connectivity to neighboring jurisdictions’ transit systems. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 25 Having multimodal options between neighborhoods, Activity Centers, and open space is important in achieving the vision for Imagine Buckeye 2040. The TMP identifies opportunities to expand upon the existing transit, pedestrian, and bicycle linkages between these destination locations. Maintaining Transportation Infrastructure The Buckeye MPA covers a vast area and will therefore include a vast network of roadways, transit facilities, bicycle facilities, and pedestrian facilities. Although substantial portions of the City’s future transportation network are driven by development, once the transportation network is built, the City will be responsible for operating and maintaining this network. Maintaining roadways and drainage systems is a significant cost for all municipal governments. Commonly referred to as operations and maintenance (O&M), planning for long-term maintenance of the transportation system is critical in ensuring the system is sustainable over time. The preservation of rights-of-way for regional and local facilities is an important step to be addressed in this planning process. With an ever-expanding roadway network, the funding for operations and maintenance will be a growing concern and should be a priority in the budget process for every fiscal year. Potential funding sources for O&M were identified for the different modes of transportation in this TMP. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 26 2. Street Plan The Street Plan in the City of Buckeye focuses on a comprehensive roadway network that facilitates multimodal mobility and connectivity throughout the City. It balances mobility and circulation with the safety of various roadway users. Planning for multimodal components of the street network helps create positive impacts to the overall quality of life in the community. The Street Plan identifies methods for improving mobility and reducing congestion on roadways throughout the City to provide efficient local circulation and regional connectivity. The Street Plan will also support projected increases in travel demand that are anticipated as the City continues to grow and prosper. This chapter addresses the existing conditions of the street network and establishes strategies for improving mobility on streets, while simultaneously prioritizing safety. The Street Plan chapter is made up of the following eleven sections: • Section 2.1 Existing Street Network. Street-related infrastructure and street network that currently exist in the City of Buckeye. • Section 2.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan. Street and related Land Use Goals and Policies from the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 27 • Section 2.3 Multimodal Integration. The framework for the street network to serve multiple users: personal vehicles, bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, freight, rail, and aviation. • Section 2.4 Relevant Street Plans. Relevant previous plans and studies that support the recommendations of the Street Plan chapter. • Section 2.5 Street Design. The types and design of roadways found in Buckeye. • Section 2.6 Street Network Connectivity and Multimodal Accommodation. How the street network connects to neighborhoods and impacts other modes of transportation. • Section 2.7 Travel Demand Modeling. The travel demand modeling process and its outcomes. • Section 2.8 Street Recommendations. Recommendations for the future street network. • Section 2.9 Street Implementation and Funding. Process of implementation and the potential funding sources to assist in the Street Plan chapter implementation. • Section 2.10 Summary. Summary of the Street Plan chapter. 2.1 Existing Street Network Understanding the existing street network and how it functions is important for planning future transportation in the City of Buckeye. At present, the most prominent mode of transportation is the passenger vehicle, as shown in Figure 2-1. Currently, 904 miles of roadway exist in the City of Buckeye. While a majority of these roads are maintained by the City, it is important to factor in the impact of other roadways as they also contribute to the City’s mobility. This section provides an overview of several factors related to the street network, including street configuration, street classifications, jurisdictional responsibility, and crash data assessments. Figure 2-1. Modes of Transportation Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey 2018-2022. Drive Alone 71% Carpool 11% Public Transportation 1% Bike < 1% Walk 1% Other 2% Work from Home 14% Drive Alone Carpool Public Transportation Bike Walk Other Work from Home BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 28 Existing Street Configuration Street configuration includes the number of lanes in each direction for each street. Figure 2-2 shows how existing roadways are configured throughout the Buckeye Municipal Planning Area (MPA). Details including jurisdictional responsibility and roadway classification are presented in tabular form in Appendix C. The current network has some incomplete connections and limited capacity in certain parts of the planning area. This is most prominently seen in the area confined by I-10, MC 85, SR 85, and Perryville Road, where new subdivisions have been developed with stub roads or selectively widened arterials. Additionally, it has been identified that there is a lack of east-west connectivity north of I-10. With the exception of Tonopah Salome Highway – which extends from Sun Valley Parkway to the western extent of the planning area – and McDowell Road, which closely parallels I-10 to the north between the eastern extent of the planning area and Verrado Way. Connectivity is expected to improve as new development becomes established in the planning area. South of I-10, there are a limited number of existing roads that are continuous from the eastern to western boundary or north to south from I-10 to the Gila River. Currently, there are no arterials that provide a complete east-west connectivity, with the exception of Baseline Road, which turns into MC 85 east of Apache Road. Arterials that provide existing north-south connectivity from the Gila River area to I-10 include Palo Verde Road, Miller Road, Verrado Way, Jackrabbit Trail, and Perryville Road. At present, Jackrabbit Trail is the only arterial that crosses the Gila River. Considering all roadway types, SR 85 is the most continuous within the MPA south of I-10, serving as a north-south connection to the Town of Gila Bend and I-8. Due to the City’s expansive land area, the portion of the MPA north of I-10 is sparsely populated, resulting in a limited number of roadways. The most continuous roadway within the MPA north of I-10 is Sun Valley Parkway, which is the continuation of Palo Verde Road, located south of I-10. Sun Valley Parkway provides two lanes in each direction from I-10 to the City of Surprise boundary. Other Major Arterial roadways include Canyon Springs Boulevard, Desert Oasis Boulevard, Beardsley Parkway, Tartesso Parkway, 303rd Avenue, and Bruner Road within the Tartesso CMP. These Major Arterials are specific to CMPs, and provide more than one lane in each direction; however as no other developments are currently underway, their primary function is to provide connectivity from the development to Sun Valley Parkway. Additionally, Verrado Way within the Verrado CMP mostly provides two-lanes in each direction from the southern to the northern boundary of the CMP, except at a short segment of Verrado Way between Lost Creek Drive on the south and Sunrise Lane on the north where only one-lane in each direction is provided. Other existing Major Arterial roads north of I-10 include Patton Road, Camelback Road, Indian School Road, Thomas Road, McDowell Road, Jackrabbit Trail, Tonopah Salome Highway and Perryville Road. These roadways provide one-lane only in each direction for most of their span except for Camelback Road. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 29 Figure 2-2. Existing Lane Configuration BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 30 Existing Street Classifications Street classifications indicate the function of mobility and access on a roadway. Mobility is the physical movement from place to place, while access is the ingress and egress, or ability to enter and leave adjacent land. As illustrated in Figure 2-3, streets with more frequent access points (i.e. Local streets) have lower mobility than streets with less access points (i.e. Arterial streets). The theory behind the functional classification system is that streets are categorized based on where they fall within the spectrum of mobility to access. Arterial streets are designed to provide mobility and high speeds for longer trip distances; local streets are designed for lower speeds and many access points. Figure 2-3. Relationship between Street Classifications and Mobility Between ADOT, MAG, MCDOT, and the City of Buckeye, each agency uses a different street classification system. The functional classification categories for ADOT are defined in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Functional Classification Concepts, Criteria and Procedure. MAG classifies all network roadways into a facility type for the purpose of travel demand modeling. Each of the MAG facility types relates to the operational capacity of the roadway design. Table 2-1 shows how each of the street classifications compare between agencies as well as the lane configuration assumed in the travel demand modeling efforts for this Transportation Master Plan. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 31 Table 2-1. Street Classification Comparison Revised Network Lane Configuration City of Buckeye Classification* MAG Facility Type ADOT Functional Classification** Freeway - Freeway Interstate/Freeway/Urban Principal Arterial Parkway - Arizona Parkway Principal Arterial 8-lane Roadway Principal Arterial Arterial Principal Arterial 6-Lane Roadway Major Arterial Arterial Minor Arterial 4-Lane Roadway Arterial Arterial Minor Arterial - Major Collector Collector Major Collector - Industrial Collector Collector Minor Collector - Collector Collector Minor Collector - Major Local - Local - Local - Local Sources: *Engineering Design Standards, City of Buckeye, 2012; **Statewide Functional System – Current vs Proposed, ADOT, arcg.is/10CeDv, ADOT. Figure 2-4, Figure 2-5 and Figure 2-6, show the street classifications for Buckeye, ADOT, and MAG, respectively. The City’s roadway classification is similar, but not identical to the ones outlined by ADOT or MAG. Existing Jurisdictional Responsibility Roadways within the Buckeye MPA are owned, operated, and maintained by various agencies, including the City of Buckeye, MCDOT, and ADOT. The jurisdictional responsibility for each roadway within the Buckeye MPA is displayed in Figure 2-7. Additionally, Appendix C includes the existing street network table that displays the jurisdictional responsibility for the roadways within the Buckeye MPA under the column “Jurisdictional Responsibility”. ADOT is responsible for all routes in the State Highway System (SHS) within the Buckeye MPA. The responsibility of all non-state roads within the City limits and MPA fall either to the City of Buckeye or MCDOT. Each agency plans for roadway improvements – MCDOT does this through a Transportation Improvement Program, ADOT does this through their State Transportation Improvement Program, and the City does this through a Capital Improvement Program. Jurisdictional responsibility is important to understand for the implementation of the street recommendations in this TMP and maintaining the future roadway system. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 32 Figure 2-4. Existing City Classification BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 33 Figure 2-5. ADOT Functional Classification BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 34 Figure 2-6. MAG Facility Type BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 35 Figure 2-7. Agency Responsibility BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 36 Existing Crash Data ADOT provides information pertaining to crashes that have occurred over the last five years within the Buckeye city limits. Crash data was collected for the years 2019 through 2023 and assessed in this process. Crash density was determined through spatial analysis, which grouped all crashes that occurred within 1750 feet of another crash. Within the five-year period, a total of 4,921 crash incidences were recorded within the City limits. Crash locations were used to identify crashes along a corridor or at an intersection. Figure 2-8 presents the crash data in two formats: the map on the left highlights the crash locations within the planning area and the map on the right displays a heat map of crash densities, ranging from low to high. The crash data provided by ADOT was further examined to determine the level of severity for crashes. Crash severity is a critical factor in applying for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds used to improve roadway conditions. Figure 2-8. All Crash Density BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 37 Table 2-1. High and Medium Crash Frequency Locations Intersection Number of Crashes High Crash Frequency Locations Watson Rd and Yuma Rd 117 Watson Rd and Sundance Ave 63 Verrado Way and Yuma Rd 50 SR 85 and Broadway Rd 49 Watson Rd and Broadway Rd 42 Verrado Way and I-10 40 Jackrabbit Trail and I-10 39 Jackrabbit Trail and I-10 39 Sun Valley Pkwy and I-10 34 SR 85 and Southern Ave 33 Watson Rd and I-10 north side 32 Miller Rd and Lower Buckeye Rd 32 Medium Crash Frequency Locations Miller Rd and Southern Ave 29 Rainbow Rd and Yuma Rd 28 Jackrabbit Trail and Van Buren St 26 Miller Rd and I-10 25 Jackrabbit Trail and Indian School Rd 24 Miller Rd and Broadway Rd 24 Watson Rd and Lower Buckeye Rd 24 Miller Rd and Durango St 22 Dean Rd and Yuma Rd 22 Apache Rd and Southern Ave 22 Miller Rd and I-10 north side 22 Watson Rd and Southern Ave 18 Miller Rd and Beloat Rd 17 Verrado Way and McDowell Rd 15 Apache Rd and MC 85 5 Many of the 35 fatalities and 107 suspected serious injury crashes have occurred along I-10 and SR 85, as shown on Figure 2-9. Figure 2-9 displays the fatal and serious injury crash locations on the left map, while the map on the right presents a corresponding heat map. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 38 Figure 2-9. Fatal and Serious Injury Crash Locations Crashes resulting in suspected serious injuries have occurred at 19 intersections within Buckeye. Other than freeway locations, fatalities have occurred at seven (7) intersections within Buckeye including: • SR 85 and Broadway Road • SR 85 and Southern Avenue • Miller Road and Warner Road • Apache Road and Yuma Road • Verrado Way and Van Buren Street • Sunrise Lane and Indian School Road • Jackrabbit Trail and Van Buren Street This crash data is important to understand so that the City can ensure that the future roadway network is planned and designed with safety as a top priority. 2.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identified multiple policies applicable to the street network in the MPA. These street-related policies provide a foundation for planning the future street network. The policies state the importance of providing connectivity and that regional partnerships are necessary to accomplish the City’s goals. The policies illustrate the importance of the street network to provide multimodal connectivity for multiple users including transit, pedestrians and bicyclists. Furthermore, the policies indicate the importance of highway and arterial connectivity to overall network functionality. Each of these points are carried throughout this Chapter and all chapters of the TMP. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 39 The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identified the following street-related policies relative to the future street network to serve Buckeye as it grows. • Goal S-9 Buckeye is a connected community with an efficient multimodal transportation network. • Policy S-9.1 The City of Buckeye will require new development to provide connectivity to existing transportation networks to provide accessibility and efficient connections to adjacent parcels, neighborhoods, Activity Centers, and the region. • Policy S-9.2 New development should provide active transportation facilities, such as pedestrian paths, bike paths, and trails that enhance connectivity between community green spaces and to regional parks and the Maricopa County trail system. • Policy S-9.3 The City of Buckeye should ensure that the transportation network is managed, operated, and maintained efficiently. • Policy S-9.4 The City of Buckeye should design roads for multimodal accessibility, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. • Policy S-9.5 Collector streets should continue and connect master planned communities to provide alternative pedestrian, bike, and transportation routes without dependency on arterial network. • Policy S-9.6 The City of Buckeye should ensure that transit options are provided to Activity Centers and other destination locations. • Policy S-9.7 The City of Buckeye will support expanding capacity on the existing I-10 and SR85. • Policy S-9.8 The City of Buckeye will actively promote and lobby for the expansion and development of new key transportation facilities, including commuter rail and other regional transportation opportunities. • Goal S-10 Buckeye has a regional approach to transportation planning. • Policy S-10.1 The City of Buckeye will use the 2025 TMP update as the base for its future roadway network. • Policy S-10.2 The City of Buckeye will work to expand partnerships with ADOT, MCDOT, MAG, and adjacent municipalities when planning and funding transportation infrastructure. • Policy S-10.3 The City of Buckeye should regularly update transportation plans consistent with regional objectives. • Goal S-11 Buckeye has a roadway system that is safe and efficient. • Policy S-11.1 The City of Buckeye should plan for future transportation corridors by identifying and preserving adequate rights-of-way during the planning and development process. • Policy S-11.2 The City of Buckeye should update the Capital Improvement Plan with needed road improvements on an annual basis. • Policy S-11.3 The City of Buckeye should improve the flow of traffic by addressing missing links in the arterial network. • Policy S-11.4 The City of Buckeye should designate appropriate truck routes that provide efficient connections to industrial and commercial uses and do not adversely impact residential land uses. • Policy S-11.5 The City of Buckeye should continue to support the update and implementation of the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 40 • Policy S-11.6 New development should provide connectivity to adjacent neighborhoods to minimize arterial dependency. • Goal S-12 Buckeye’s multimodal system provides alternatives for modes of travel. • Policy S-12.5 The City of Buckeye should continue to provide transportation options for the elderly and special needs residents. • Policy S-12.6 The City of Buckeye should continue to promote methods of air pollution reduction related to transportation, such as the Travel Reduction Program. • Policy S-12.7 New development will plan, design and construct, where appropriate, roadways in conformance with [Imagine Buckeye General Plan] Figure 3-3, Future Transportation Network. These policies provide broad guidance for street related recommendations in this TMP. 2.3 Multimodal Integration An important concept for Buckeye’s future transportation system is the mobility, connectivity, and proximity of multiple modes of transportation. Within the future transportation network, each of these transportation modes should complement one another in a safe and efficient manner. Of all the modes, the street network is perhaps the most important component to building and maintaining a multimodal system. This is because the street network serves multiple purposes including the movement of personal vehicles, trucks, transit vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians, as well as providing access to the airport, across railways, and regional canals. Furthermore, the City’s ITS network will be a supporting component of the street network to ensure all modes of transportation interact in a safe and efficient manner. In addition to laying out the future street network, this chapter has been expanded to communicate the importance of establishing mode priorities on roadways and the importance of creating network redundancy with a connected local and collector roadway network. 2.4 Relevant Street Plans The street network in Buckeye has been studied in numerous previous planning efforts, either as a direct focus of a project specific planning effort or as a part of a regional planning effort. A list of the plans and studies that were considered in the development of this plan was provided previously in Table 1-1. Included in this section is a more detailed description of those plans most relevant to Buckeye’s street network. MCDOT Transportation System Plan 2040 The MCDOT Transportation System Plan (TSP) 2040 is the implementation component of the transportation element of the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan, Vision 2030, and was adopted in 2022. The TSP plans for current transportation needs in a safe, efficient, and environmentally compatible way that supports economic development throughout Maricopa County. Transportation systems assessed in the TSP include roadways, bicycle facilities, and the regional trail system. The TSP 2040 accounts for three planning horizons – 2025, 2030, and 2040 – and identifies goals, objectives, and strategies for transportation throughout the county and how each goal will be achieved. Additionally, the TSP includes maps, such as the Functional Classification of MCDOT Roadways map. This map shows principal arterials, minor arterials, major collectors, minor collectors, and local streets throughout the unincorporated county, including Sun Valley Parkway and MC 85, which were used as BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 41 part of the framework for the TMP. The Functional Classification map from the TSP is shown on Figure 2-10. Much of the network shown in the TSP in Buckeye is located between I-10 and the Gila River. Projects were identified through a needs analysis, which compared determined growth to service volume standards to determine roadways that exceed the Level of Service (LOS) standards. While the analysis indicates that most of the county roads in Buckeye currently meet the LOS standards, there are roads that are projected to exceed LOS standards by 2040. Figure 2-10. Functional Classification of MCDOT roadways from the MCDOT TSP 2040 Source: MCDOT TSP, 2022 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan The Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP) was adopted in 2001 and last revised in 2011 in response to the MCDOT 2030 TSP. The MSRP was used for planning future development along Maricopa County roads with consideration given to adequate visibility and access, protecting property values and neighborhood character, and enhancing unique County areas along Maricopa County roads. The adoption of the MCDOT TSP 2040 in 2020 formally replaced the MSRP as a governing planning document for the county. MCDOT Transportation Improvement Program The MCDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a five-year financial planning tool for transportation system improvements throughout the County, last updated in 2025 for fiscal year (FY) 2026 – FY 2030. The plan identifies transportation system management projects, which, upon completion, will allow the transportation system to function more efficiently. The projects that fall within the Buckeye MPA include: BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 42 Old US Hwy 80 from Patterson Rd to Agua Caliente – high friction surface treatment (2026) Perryville Rd at Indian School Rd – intersection improvements (2028) Old US Hwy 80 at Gila River – new bridge construction (2028-2030) Sun Valley Parkway Restoration Phase 5 – mill and full reconstruction (2026) Sun Valley Parkway Restoration Phase 6 – mill and full reconstruction (2029-2030 Wintersburg Rd Buckeye Rd to Van Buren St – passing lane and centerline rumble strips (2026- 2027) Van Buren at Jackrabbit Tr – intersection improvement contribution (2026) 27th Ave Lower Buckeye to R C Easterbrook – capacity enhancement (TBD) ADOT Long-Range Transportation Plan The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) 2050 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is a policy document that must be updated every five years to provide a current “roadmap” for the state transportation system over the next 25 years (2026-2050). The development of the LRTP included an extensive engagement process across a wide range of stakeholders, including Arizona residents and regional and local transportation leaders across the state. Feedback from the engagement process supported the creation of the vision, goals, objectives, and implementation strategies to support Arizona’s future transportation system. As part of the planning effort, an analysis was done to identify the gap between the projected transportation need and the projected transportation revenue. The transportation gap emphasizes the importance of strategically allocating ADOT’s limited resources as defined by the Recommended Investment Choice (RIC). The 2050 LRTP projected three revenue forecasts: a low forecast, a baseline forecast, and a high forecast. ADOT decided the baseline forecast would be the basis for the LRTP gap analysis. The anticipated revenue available over the 25-year period is $69.1 billion, which includes ADOT’s portion of the Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF), the freeways and highways portion of the MAG Regional Area Road Fund (RARF) funding, freeways and highways from Pima Association of Governments (PAG) Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) funding, and ADOT funding from Federal Aid. It also includes ADOT stewardship programs such as federal transit funding, as well as federal and state aviation funding. The funding gap represents the difference between projected needs and ADOT’s projected revenues. The 2050 LRTP reflects a statewide transportation gap of $162 billion—more than double the forecast revenue—highlighting the need to prioritize strategic investments. Figure 2-11 shows ADOT’s recommended statewide investment, while Figure 2-12 shifts focus to the MAG region’s recommended investment. MAG allocates funding—often through federal and regional sources—to ADOT for improvements on state-managed facilities within Maricopa County. This partnership plays a key role in advancing regionally significant projects, including those within and around Buckeye. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 43 Figure 2-11. Statewide Recommended Investment Source: ADOT LRTP, 2023 Figure 2-12. MAG Recommended Investment Source: ADOT LRTP, 2023 ADOT I-11 and Intermountain West Study ADOT is the leading Arizona agency for the future I-11 corridor. The corridor is a proposed new interstate that would provide a link between the Phoenix metropolitan area and Las Vegas, Nevada. The ultimate vision is to provide a multi-modal interstate corridor serving the Intermountain West and extending from the US/Mexico border north to the US/Canada border. This route would provide freight linkages between new and expanding ports in Mexico and Canada, ports on the West Coast as well as future inland ports and would contribute to the distribution of goods across North America. In Arizona, the I-11 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 44 corridor is proposed to begin at the US/Mexico border in Nogales and head north to Wickenburg, bypassing the Phoenix metropolitan area to the west. I-11 would then follow the US 93 alignment from Wickenburg and proceed north to Las Vegas. The I-11 and Intermountain West Study was completed in 2014 to determine if the I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor concept is justifiable and to establish likely routes for the corridor. The Study identified project development next steps, including segments of I-10/I-8 in Casa Grande to I-10 in Buckeye and from I-10 in Buckeye to US 93 in Wickenburg. ADOT I-11 Environmental Impact Statement The next phase of the I-11 corridor after the Intermountain West Study was the Environmental Impact Statement Study. A Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was initiated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and ADOT for the I-11 alignment between Nogales and Wickenburg in 2016. The EIS is a part of the overall environmental review for the I-11 corridor and is in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as well as other requirements. The primary purpose of the Tier 1 EIS was to reach a consensus on a preferred alternative, which included a defined corridor between Nogales and Wickenburg for a proposed transportation facility, type of transportation facility, footprint to accommodate the proposed transportation facility, and smaller, individual projects for future implementation. The selected corridor alternative will be 2,000-feet wide between Nogales and Wickenburg. The Tier 1 EIS process completed the Alternatives Selection Report in 2017, which developed, evaluated, and screened corridor options for the I-11 corridor from Nogales to Wickenburg. In May 2019, the I-11 Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Recommended Corridor Alternative was published by ADOT and FHWA for public review and comment. The Recommended Alternative is a 2,000 feet wide corridor (not specific roadway alignment). This corridor would encompass the alignment for the I-11 highway, which would be approximately 400 feet wide. ADOT and FHWA reviewed all public and stakeholder comments submitted during the Tier 1 Study and based on this feedback, made adjustments to the corridor. The Final Tier 1 EIS was made available for public review on July 16, 2021 which outlines the Preferred Corridor Alternative, including a parallel analysis of the No-Build Alternative. Figure 2-14 shows the Preferred Corridor Alternative published in July 2021. The City of Buckeye has completed a review of the published I-11 Final Tier 1 EIS and does support the recommended Preferred Corridor Alternative. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 45 Figure 2-13. ADOT I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS (Buckeye Area Only) Source: Final Tier 1 EIS, July 2021. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 46 MAG 1-10 / Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study The Hassayampa Valley Framework Study served as the primary foundation for the buildout network within the City of Buckeye, which played a critical role in guiding the development of planned roadway infrastructure. The Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study, the “Hassayampa Study”, was completed in 2008 to plan adequate roadways in areas where growth is expected. The Hassayampa Study covers approximately 1,400 square miles, from SR 303 on the east, 459th Avenue on the west, SR- 74 on the north, and the Gila River on the south. The purpose of the Hassayampa Study was to plan adequate high-capacity roadways to prevent I-10 from becoming too congested. Through the study, a conceptual roadway framework was recommended, which included a final Hassayampa Valley roadway network map as well as major modifications to the network. Figure 2-14 shows the recommended transportation framework, which was used by the City to create the future transportation network within the City of Buckeye. MAG I-8 / Hidden Valley Transportation Study The Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study is another key resource that supported the planning of the buildout network. It complements the Hassayampa Valley Framework Study by focusing on southern Buckeye, which was not covered in the original study. The Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study was completed in 2008 to plan adequate roadways in areas where growth is expected. The study covers approximately 3,000 square miles, from Gila River on the north, the I-8 corridor on the south, Overfield Road on the east, and 459th Avenue on the west. Like the Hassayampa Study, the Hidden Valley Study recommended a transportation framework for the study area, which included a roadway network map as well as recommended major modifications to the network. The recommended transportation framework is shown on Figure 2-15. MAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (MOMENTUM 2050) MOMENTUM, published by MAG in 2021, provides a regional framework for all major modes of transportation through the year 2050. Within the City, the RTP identifies new general-purpose lanes on I- 10, the development of the interim SR 30 corridor, and improvements along SR 85 as freeway/highway projects planned to occur between Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 and FY 2051. The recommended corridors in the RTP are shown in Figure 2-16. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 47 Figure 2-14. MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study, Recommended Transportation Framework Source: MAG I-10/Hassayampa Valley Framework Study, 2008 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 48 Figure 2-15. Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study Recommended Framework Source: MAG, I-8/I-10 Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study, 2009 Figure 2-16. MAG RTP Recommended Corridors Source: MAG RTP, 2021. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 49 MAG Transportation Improvement Program The MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), last updated in 2022, is a five-year guide for public transportation services across Maricopa County for FY 2025-2030. The TIP identifies highway related projects that are currently underway or planned for the City of Buckeye for FY 2025-2030. The majority of the improvements listed for the City are for street improvements, shown below in Table 2-2. Table 2-2. MAG TIP Improvements in Buckeye Road From To Description Year Jackrabbit Trail south of McDowell Rd north of Van Buren St I-10/Jackrabbit Trail traffic interchange 2031 I-10 SR-85 Citrus Rd Widening 2030 I-10 Verrado Way 99th Avenue ITS System Improvements 2026 Festival Foothills Elementary Study on safe school routes 2025 Van Buren St Sun Valley Pkwy Wilson Ave Construct new roadway 2026 Broadway Rd Watson Rd East of Watson Rd Construct new roadway 2026 Monroe Ave Johnson Road Miller Road ITS System Improvements 2026 Liberty Elementary School District: Blue Horizons Elementary School / Freedom Elementary School Study on safe school routes 2025 Rainbow Road Durango Street RID Canal Roadway Widening 2026 Festival Pkwy Sun Valley Pkwy CAP Canal Construct new roadway 2026 MC 85 At Miller Rd ITS System Improvements 2025 Baseline Rd Turner Rd East of Turner Rd Construct new roadway 2026 I-10 Johnson Rd SR-85 ITS System Improvements 2028 Miller Road At Maricopa Rd Install Traffic Signal 2026 McDowell Rd Dean Rd Alignment Verrado Way Construct new roadway 2026 Source: MAG Transportation Improvement Program, 2022 2.5 Street Design Within the City of Buckeye, the Engineering Design Standards Section 6-3, Street Planning and Design Criteria (Design Standards) set the design and configuration standards for all city-owned roadways, intersections, street access/driveways, sidewalks, roundabouts, bridges, retaining walls, structure clearances, side slopes, half streets, pavement transitions, subdivision street planning, as well as other transportation-related elements. The Design Standards include typical roadway design elements as well as typical cross-section designs for City street classifications. The following are descriptions of each type of roadway within the City of Buckeye: BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 50 Parkway Parkways provide regional connectivity. Parkways are owned and operated by either MCDOT or the City of Buckeye. The design standards for Parkways must follow the standards outlined in the MCDOT Design Guideline Recommendations for the Arizona Parkway as modified by the City. The ADOT functional classification equivalence to Parkway is Urban Principal Arterial and the MAG facility type equivalence is Parkway. Principal Arterial Principal arterials offer high-capacity regional mobility. The ADOT functional classification equivalent is Urban Principal Arterial, and the MAG facility type equivalence is Major Arterial. Principal Arterials with 8 through lanes—sometimes referred to as “Super Arterials”—are intended to accommodate significant traffic volumes and provide critical connections between Parkways, highways, and key regional destinations. Major Arterial Street Major Arterial streets provide connectivity and traffic movement for large traffic volumes. Access on Major Arterial streets is limited to facilitate traffic movement. The ADOT functional classification equivalence to Major Arterial is Urban Minor Arterial and the MAG facility type equivalence is Major Arterial. Minor Arterial Street Minor Arterial streets provide connectivity and movement of traffic for moderate volumes of traffic. Access on Minor Arterial streets is limited to the greatest extent possible to facilitate traffic movement. The ADOT functional classification equivalence to Minor Arterial streets is Urban Minor Arterial and the MAG facility type equivalence is Major Arterial. Major Collector Street Like Arterial streets, Major Collector streets provide connectivity and movement of traffic for moderate volumes of traffic. The ADOT functional classification equivalence to Major Collector is Urban Collector and the MAG facility type equivalence is Collector. Commercial/Industrial Collector Street Commercial/Industrial Collector streets facilitate the movement of traffic within industrial, commercial, and other non-residential areas. These streets are designed to support heavier vehicle loads and provide access to business and industrial properties. The ADOT functional classification equivalence is Urban Collector, and the MAG facility type equivalence is Collector Minor Collector Street Minor Collector streets provide for traffic movement between Arterials streets and Local streets, as well as within other non-residential land uses. The ADOT classification equivalence to Minor Collector is Urban Collector and the MAG facility type equivalence is Collector. Local Street Local streets provide direct access to abutting land uses, provide access to collector street system, as well as accommodate low traffic volumes. Local streets are designed to discourage high travel speeds BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 51 and are not intended for through traffic. The ADOT classification equivalence to Local street is Urban Local street and there is no equivalence for MAG facility type. Residential Entrance Residential entrances are street sections that are used to connect Local streets to either Collectors or Arterials. There is no ADOT classification or MAG facility type equivalence for residential entrances. 2.6 Street Network Connectivity and Multimodal Integration The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan includes a strategy recommendation for the City to create a network of streets that safely accommodates all users: “The City of Buckeye should design roads for multimodal accessibility, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians.” The City Development Services Department manages the Design Standards for roadway designs. The Design Standards include typical cross-sections for all roadway classifications, as described previously in Section 2.5. Each of these roadway cross-sections provides accommodation for multiple modes within the rights-of-way. Multimodal considerations are widely accepted as an industry best practice. As best practices in multimodal integration evolve, the City will continue to update these standards to reflect preferred conditions for the safe and comfortable integration of all modes of travel. Sustaining a system of multimodal facilities will provide a safe transportation system for all users regardless of age or ability. Making a community safe to walk, bicycle, and use transit fosters improved health, encourages community interaction, promotes sustainability, and portrays environmental stewardship. As communities grow, these facilities enhance opportunities for transit use and diverse mobility options for all travelers. It is important to note that safe accommodation of all modes cannot always be achieved on every street. Certain factors, such as available right-of-way, street character, terrain, and land use/development context, can limit modification of a street to accommodate all modes of travel. The overall goal is to provide a complete network of streets that provide a safe and reasonably efficient mobility for multiple modes of travel. In essence, not every street needs to accommodate all modes, but every mode needs to have a reasonable place in the network. Subdivision regulations are a valuable tool in incrementally implementing multimodal facilities with each new development. Related to this, the City may choose to review the subdivision regulations at the time of modifying street cross-sections to determine if the subdivision regulations are appropriately accommodating for non-motorized users. For example, most communities require sidewalk construction at the time of new development; however, some communities are also requiring developers to construct bus stop shelter pad sites, or to improve the street connectivity ratio in site planning efforts. Street Network Connectivity Connectivity within and between neighborhoods is important in encouraging multimodal travel, as well as reducing reliance on Arterial streets for vehicular trips. This means planning for streets within and between neighborhoods that would provide a direct route of travel between origin and destination. This point involves the ongoing execution of subdivision regulations. Many communities utilize subdivision regulations as a tool that requires master developers to plan and construct roads within their development. Too often, subdivision regulations do not emphasize the significance of creating an internal transportation system that would allow people to easily navigate from nearby commercial or institutional areas to their home and too often it is assumed every trip is vehicular, shown in Figure 2-17. A typical suburban subdivision pattern with many cul-de-sacs and loop streets creates long circuitous BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 52 routes of travel, poor circulation, and no relief route for the arterial street. An improved circulation condition would create internal collector streets that connect neighborhood to neighborhood. In terms of achieving the best mobility for all transportation system users, the recommended conditions would be to provide a street pattern that allows for many access points and alternative routes while also shortening the travel distance to or from a nearby destination. It is the recommendation of this TMP that all half-mile collectors enter and exit at the half-mile location and provide a direct connection to adjacent half-mile collectors, shown below. It is the recommendation of this TMP that the existing subdivision regulations be examined and possibly updated for the enforceability of these concepts. Figure 2-17. Street Network Connectivity BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 53 Determining Trade-offs in Multimodal Accommodation All modes of transportation impact one another. For example, a high level of service (LOS) for automobiles is likely to cause high travel speeds and potentially high traffic volumes; consequently, the bicycle and pedestrian environment is often negatively impacted resulting in a low LOS for these modes. The process of implementing multimodal designs is based on the principle of tradeoffs in roadway design. Although roadway design standards are determined in the City of Buckeye Design Standards and provide the preferred design for each roadway cross-section, an understanding of a roadway’s modal priorities is necessary in determining how to address roadway design challenges. The engineering design of roadways often requires custom design to ensure safe accommodation of all modes within the right-of- way. Understanding the development context is an important consideration. It is important that urban roadway design standards promote mixed-traffic activity and identify modal priorities by street type and character of development. Figure 2-18 below, provides an example of how to develop standard cross-sections for multimodal accommodation for streets greater than Local streets. A standard roadway is divided into three parts: the travel way (including vehicles and on-street bicycles), the pedestrian realm (including pedestrians, off- street bicycles, and other mobility-assistance devices), and the development realm (including the adjacent land use characteristics). Figure 2-18. Component Parts of a Street BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 54 2.7 Travel Demand Modeling As a federally-authorized Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), MAG monitors traffic flows and mobility. The MAG Regional activity-based travel demand model (TDM) was implemented for the City’s purposes as the most suitable tool for projecting future travel patterns on a local level with consideration given to future population and employment growth and changes in regional connectivity. While the model primarily focuses on vehicular demand, it does account for trips made through alternate modes, such as transit, walking, and biking. It also accounts for the impacts of trips captured between different types of uses within a larger master planned area, reducing the number of trips that are assigned to the external roadway network to account for trips captured within the development. The outcome of the travel demand modeling process includes anticipated roadway segment capacity, traffic volumes for that segment, and the resulting level of service for the roadway segment. Level of Service Level of Service (LOS) is a way to measure the existing or anticipated traffic congestion on roadways, providing a quantitative score for operational health of the roadway. Roadways are scored “A” through “F”, where “A” indicates free flow, low traffic density and “F” indicates travel volumes are greater than capacity resulting in roadway congestion. The following are descriptions of each LOS, which are illustrated on Figure 2-19: • A: Free flow, low traffic density. • B: Minimal delay, stable traffic flow. • C: Stable condition, movements somewhat restricted due to higher volumes, but not objectionable for motorists. • D: Movements more restricted, queues and delays may occur during short peaks, but lower demand occurs often enough to permit clearing, preventing excessive backups. • E: Actual capacity of the roadway involves a delay to all motorists due to congestion. • F: Forced flow with demand volumes greater than capacity resulting in complete congestion. LOS can be used to monitor potential transportation network congestion issues at City buildout. A common misconception of LOS is that all roadways should strive for a LOS grade “A”. In developing areas like Buckeye, roads often have a higher LOS at initial construction due to excess of capacity, which degrades over time as the community builds out. As described in Section 2.6, the trade-offs in multimodal accommodation should be considered when establishing a target LOS for vehicular travel. The City of Buckeye has established LOS “D” as their target LOS. LOS “E” or LOS “F” roadways should be mitigated so that at least LOS “D” can be achieved based on build-out conditions. For roadways that yield a LOS E or F, the following may be considered: • Upgrade the roadway classification / configuration; or • Conduct an intersection analysis / study to determine if improvements at intersections will improve LOS. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 55 Figure 2-19. Level of Service Concept Existing Conditions (2023) Existing PM peak hour traffic volumes, taken from the MAG 2023 travel demand model, are shown on Figure 2-20. It should be noted that recent improvements have been made from 2024 to 2025. As of the 2023 data, the highest peak period volume occurs on Watson Road in the segment between I-10 and Yuma followed by peak period volume on Verrado Way between McDowell Road and I-10. The highest peak period demand generally occurs on streets south of I-10 that have direct access to I-10, such as Miller Road, Watson Road, and Verrado Way. The LOS for each roadway segment was assessed during both the AM and PM peak hours. To identify areas that need improvement, the maximum LOS across these peak periods was reported. As illustrated in the LOS analysis Figure 2-21., there is sufficient peak period capacity to accommodate peak period traffic volume on most City roadways. Buildout Conditions (Post 2050) It is anticipated that development within the Buckeye planning area will continue to occur long past the 2050 horizon year analyzed by MAG. Therefore, additional analysis was conducted to estimate anticipated travel demands and roadway needs associated with buildout of the area. Travel demand models have two types of input, socio-economic data (SED) and the roadway network. SED includes population and employment estimates based on the anticipated land use. The roadway network consists of both existing roadways and future roadways anticipated to serve new development. The model estimates trips associated with the SED estimates and assigns them to the roadway network, producing traffic volume estimates for each modeled roadway. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 56 Figure 2-20. (2023) Traffic Volumes BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 57 Figure 2-21. 2023 Level of Service BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 58 The Buildout SED assumptions were guided by those used in the previous TMP, which were based on the City of Buckeye General Plan, approved on April 3, 2018 and ratified on August 28, 2018, shown below in Figure 2-22. A workshop with City staff was held to review any land use changes since the last TMP, and adjustments were made accordingly. Following these updates, the total employment and dwelling units under the buildout condition were determined to be 561,104 and 621,887, respectively. The buildout roadway network was developed by refining the previously recommended TMP roadway network. Two buildout roadway network scenarios were modeled to evaluate system performance and identify potential improvements. The model results are shown on Figure 2-23, Figure 2-24 and Figure 2-25. The TMP is a living document that is updated every 5-6 years. The roadway network reflects what is needed to accommodate the currently approved zoning and CMPs throughout the City. It is understood that as market demand changes, zoning and development CMPs may as well. When a CMP amendment, and associated roadway network, is approved by City Council, the approved roadway network will become an approved amendment to the TMP. At the next update to the TMP, any approved amendments will become part of the base roadway network for the update. Scenario 1: Buildout Network with Circulation Master Plan and City Updates Since the last TMP, several CMPs have been newly approved or updated. Roadway networks identified in these CMPs were integrated into the overall roadway framework. Additionally, the City’s planned updates were incorporated, including new roadway connections consistent with amended CMP’s and modifications to roadway alignments. The City’s buildout roadway network includes several parkways, which were assumed to be 6-lane parkways per MCDOT’s parkway design guidelines. When the buildout SED was applied to the buildout roadway network, multiple roadway segments exhibited LOS “E” or LOS “F”. These areas primarily occur along I-10, on several of the 6-lane parkways, and near the Festival Ranch development. Scenario 2: Buildout Network with Bruner Road Interchange and Yuma Road Realignment Scenario 2 involved adjusting the alignment of Yuma Road east of Johnson Road, allowing the roadway to transition into Bruner Road. This scenario also included a new interchange at Bruner Road and I-10. Additionally, a major collector from Palo Verde Road will provide access to future developments north of Yuma Road. The changes in this scenario had minimal overall impact to traffic operations, with slight improvements observed along Johnson Road, Bruner Road and Sun Valley Parkway. In addition to these two modeled scenarios, a third scenario (Scenario 3) was analyzed. Scenario 3 included the Yuma Road/Bruner Road connection, and evaluated the impact of modifying Sun Valley Parkway from a parkway to an eight-lane principal arterial, in conjunction with Scenario 1 described above. The conversion of Sun Valley Parkway to an eight-lane principal arterial improves traffic flow. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 59 Figure 2-22. Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 60 Figure 2-23. Scenario 1: Buildout Network with Circulation Master Plan and City Updates BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 61 Figure 2-24. Scenario 2: Buildout Network with Bruner Road Interchange and Yuma Road Realignment BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 62 Figure 2-25. Scenario 3: Buildout Network with Scenario 2 Changes and Principal Arterials BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 63 Areas along Miller Road and Watson Road are both showing LOS “E” and LOS “F” in buildout conditions at the I-10 TIs. The MAG travel demand model does not account for turning volumes or TI configurations. However, the project volumes at these two TIs indicate that more than a 6-lane Major Arterial cross- section may be needed during buildout conditions. These locations were studied as part of the I-10 expansion project and ADOT is proceeding with final design to accommodate the 2040 volumes. Based on the results of these model runs, the following improvements to the City of Buckeye’s buildout roadway network should be made to accommodate buildout traffic volume projections: • Improve the approaches to all I-10 interchanges to an eight-lane Principal Arterial, extending from one-half mile north of the interchange to one-half mile south of the interchange • Improve Sun Valley Parkway to an 8-lane Principal Arterial between the MPA Boundary and Narramore Rd • Extend Southern Avenue across the Hassayampa River 2.8 Street Network Recommendations Several roadway improvements must be implemented by the horizon year to maintain adequate daily LOS and sustain the City’s growth in the respective areas. These roadway improvements are vital to the City’s traffic circulation plan as they coincide with areas projected to experience the highest increases in socioeconomic growth. Based on the LOS analysis, the Buildout Network with Sun Valley Parkway Principal Arterial (Scenario 3) is the recommended future street network. Provided in this section is a description of the Future Street Network including the Street Classifications and Street Configuration. Future Street Classifications Figure 2-26 displays the Future Street Network by City Street Classification. Notably, Collector and Local streets are not identified in this map and are typically planned through development review processes and Community Master Plans. Future Street Network details including jurisdictional responsibility and roadway classification are presented in tabular form in Appendix C. Freeway and Expressway In the future street network, the freeways and expressways in Buckeye consist of I-10, SR 85, and the future I-11, SR 30, and White Tanks Freeway. Additionally, just outside the Buckeye MPA is the existing SR 303 and the future Lake Pleasant Freeway. Each of these freeways are regionally- and nationally- significant routes for the movement of goods and people. Principal Arterial In the future street network, the Principal Arterials will consist of Sun Valley Parkway / Palo Verde Road, and every north/south roadway at each existing and future interchange, from ½ mile north of I-10 to ½ mile south of I-10. Parkways In the future street network, the Parkways in Buckeye consist of Turner Parkway and McDowell Parkway. Both of these Parkways are regionally significant corridors whose primary purpose is the fluid movement of people and goods. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 64 Figure 2-26. Future Street Network by City Classification BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 65 Major Arterial Streets Most of the future street network will consist of Major Arterial Streets, as displayed in Figure 2-26. Each of these Major Arterial Streets are meant to both serve mobility needs of vehicles and also the safe movement of pedestrians, bicycles, freight, and transit vehicles. Minor Arterial Streets Minor Arterials support connectivity and the movement of moderate traffic volumes within the City. To maintain efficient flow, access is restricted where possible, and all connections must include right-turn deceleration lanes. These roadways feature two travel lanes in each direction, with opposing traffic separated by a raised median. Pedestrian, bicycle, and lighting accommodations are required along the corridor. Major and Minor Collector Streets Collector streets are intended to be at half-mile spacing and are typically laid out during the development reviews and CMP’s. Development reviews include preliminary plats and site plans that fall outside of the CMP process. Collector streets provide a redundant route for Arterial streets especially in instances of construction re-routing and emergency re-routing. Furthermore, due to their lower posted speeds and traffic volumes, Collector streets tend to accommodate less experienced cyclists within the bicycle and pedestrian network, offering lower traffic volumes and speeds compared to arterial roadways. Therefore, collectors must connect to each other from one development to the next at the half mile mark. These points are expanded upon in Section 2.6 of this Chapter. The City of Buckeye has three types of Collector streets: Major Collector, Industrial Collector, and Collector. Each of these typologies is described in Section 2.5 of this Chapter. Local Streets Local streets provide direct access to abutting land uses, provide access to collector street system, as well as accommodate low traffic volumes. Local streets are designed to discourage high travel speeds and are not intended for through traffic. The City of Buckeye has two typologies of Local streets: Major Local and Local. Each of these typologies is described in Section 2.5 of this Chapter. MAG does not define a Facility Type for Major Local and Local street; however, the ADOT Functional Classification is Urban Local Street. Future Street Configuration Each of the Future Street Classifications previously described have an assumed lane configuration. At the time of design for each of these streets, the ultimate lane configuration may change from what is described in this section. Table 2-3 lists the number of lanes for each street classification. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 66 Table 2-3. Lane Configuration by City Street Classification Classification No. of Vehicle Lanes Median Parkway 8, 6, or 4 Yes Principal Arterial 8 Yes Major Arterial 6 Yes Minor Arterial 4 Yes Major Collector 4 Yes Minor Collector 2 Yes Industrial / Commercial Collector 2 Two-way left turn lane/Median Local 2 No Future Jurisdictional Responsibility Large portions of the City’s future street network will be constructed by developers. However, once the network is built, the City will be responsible to operate and maintain a vast street network including all infrastructure within street rights-of-way, with the exception of private utilities and landscaping back of curb. In some cases, Street Light Improvement Districts (SLID’s) have been formed to provide for operational costs associated with street lights. Maintaining streets and drainage systems is a significant cost for all municipal governments affecting the costs of operations and maintenance (O&M) of the transportation system. The ongoing maintenance of the street transportation network will be paid by three agencies: City of Buckeye, MCDOT, and ADOT. Figure 2-27 illustrates the jurisdictional responsibility for each of the roadways in the future street network. As developments occur within the Buckeye MPA, the City will be approached by land owners to consider annexation of their property to provide valuable municipal services. Expansion of municipal services following annexations includes the potential inheritance of already built, MCDOT-maintained streets. According to the 2014 Buckeye Roadway Annexation Policy (Policy), as the City continues to grow and expand the City will annex roadways when it is in the best interest of the City to do so. The Policy indicates several potential reasons for roadway annexation including economic development, adjacent annexations, or improvements or other potential reasons that would benefit the City, pending available funding. The City’s Policy provides a strategic process for assessing when roadway annexation should occur and the processes by which to conduct roadway annexations. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 67 Figure 2-27. Future Street Network by Agency Responsibility BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 68 2.9 Street Implementation and Funding Implementation and funding for the future street network is identified for the buildout street network in this section. Although implementation and funding is for the buildout network, there are interim priorities for street projects in Buckeye that are identified through the CIP, RTP, and 2050 MAG model run. These studies and model run were used to identify priorities for the street projects. Funding There are funding sources at the city, state, regional, and federal level to assist in the implementation of street projects. At the local level, the City requires Traffic Impact Assessments (TIAs) for new developments. Developers are required to install their half-street improvements based on build out and must dedicate full right-of-way. TIAs are used to determine if additional requirements are necessary such as left turn queue lengths, etc. which allows for spot improvements to the transportation system when developments generate increased traffic. These spot improvements can cause important network issues including half-built or “scalloped” streets that create pinch points in network fluidity, as well as intersections with misalignments creating potentially unsafe conditions. In addition to TIAs, the City programs roadway capital improvement projects as network needs warrant and when the City’s budget allows for these projects to be implemented, including funding potentially made available through the 2024 General Obligation (GO) Bond measure, which was approved by City residents in November 2024.The GO Bond would fund citywide roadway widening to address capacity constraints, including widening of Indian School Road to six lanes between Jackrabbit Trail and Perryville Road. Regionally, the MAG Arterial Life Cycle Program (ALCP), which is currently funded through Proposition 400 (half-cent sales tax on purchases in Maricopa County) provides funding for appropriate surface transportation facilities that qualify under this program. Proposition 400 was set to expire in 2025 and was renewed for another 20 years in November of 2024 as Proposition 479. Proposition 479 specifically includes funding for the following projects: • I-10/Jackrabbit Trail traffic interchange • I-10 Widening, SR 85 to Loop 303 – add an HOV lane. • SR 30 Corridor Study and right-of-way acquisition. In addition, the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) allocates federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Program –MAG Funds (STBGP-MAG) and federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Funds (CMAQ) to fund projects in the ALCP. On the state level, the HURF, which is a combination of fuel tax revenue and vehicle license tax (VLT), provides funding that can be used by State and local agencies to improve highways, bridges, tunnels, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit projects. At the federal level, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) or Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), will provide $550 billion dollars of funding for transportation infrastructure development through FY 2026. Funding is available for highways, motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, and research, technology, and statistics programs. The IIJA serves as a functional extension of the Transportation Authorization Bill (FAST Act), which expired in FY 2020. The IIJA continued and expanded the funding opportunities for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), which is a dedicated aid program with the purpose of reducing traffic fatalities and BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 69 serious injuries on public roads. The HSIP requires a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads. Through the IIJA, the HSIP will provide approximately $3 billion dollars towards highway safety projects per fiscal year through FY 2026. Implementation The Future Street Network will be built over time. Short-term recommendations include improvements identified in the City Capital Improvements Program (CIP), MCDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and include projects in the first five years following the TMP. Mid-term recommendations include improvements anticipated to be needed by 2050, resulting from the travel demand modeling efforts described in Section 2.8 of this Chapter. Long-term recommendations include improvements anticipated to be needed after 2050. These recommendations and the planning-level costs and other implementation actions associated with these improvements are included in Chapter 10 Implementation. 2.10 Summary This chapter provided an overview of the analysis leading to the future street network recommendations. Ultimately, this chapter provides a foundation for all chapters that follow, as the street network is a vital part of the operation of all modes of travel in a transportation network. The street network serves multiple purposes including the movement of personal vehicles, freight, transit vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well as providing access to the airport or across railways. Furthermore, the City’s ITS network is a supporting component of the street network to ensure all modes interact in a safe and efficient manner. In addition to laying out the future street network, this chapter includes guidance on the importance of establishing mode priorities on roadways and the importance of creating network redundancy with a connected local and collector roadway network. This chapter concluded with the identification of funding sources and implementation guideline for the future street network. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 70 3. Wildlife The preparation of this Wildlife Chapter comes at a critical time, as Buckeye experiences rapid growth and new development, and residents express strong support for preserving open space and wildlife linkage during this time of growth. Detailed information regarding wildlife can be found at the "City’s Best Practices Guide for Wildlife Corridors" located on the city’s web page. With ongoing population growth and new development, the City faces challenges in maintaining its diverse Sonoran Desert habitats. Although only about 15 percent of the City’s 640-square-mile planning area is currently developed, the remaining undeveloped lands — including mountain foothills, desert scrub, and riparian corridors such as the Gila, Hassayampa, and Tiger washes — continue to support mule deer, desert bighorn sheep, desert tortoises, bobcats, javelina, roadrunners, raptors, and a variety of migratory birds and waterfowl. These riparian zones, in particular, provide critical habitat for sensitive and federally listed species such as the southwestern willow flycatcher and western yellow-billed cuckoo. The White Tank Mountains Regional Park and other protected areas also serve as vital recreation destinations for residents and visitors, highlighting the importance of conserving these ecosystems for both ecological and cultural benefits. As growth continues, it is important to consider how transportation infrastructure and associated land development may fragment these natural areas and potentially disrupt wildlife movement. Preserving habitat connections can help sustain regional ecological health, maintain biodiversity, and support balanced, long-term development. This chapter describes the relationship between transportation planning and wildlife corridors and outlines strategies to support both growth and conservation. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 71 3.1 Regional Wildlife Habitats and Species Located within the Sonoran Desert, Buckeye features native vegetation such as palo verde, saguaros, and mesquite that thrive along its washes, forming a foundation for diverse desert wildlife. Large mammals including mule deer, mountain lions, javelina, coyotes, and bobcats rely on habitat in the White Tank Mountains, Belmont and Buckeye Hills, and the surrounding desert. Other species, such as the desert tortoise and kit fox, are well-adapted to the rocky uplands and valleys. The White Tank Mountains Regional Park, in particular, continues to provide critical habitat for these species and others — including roadrunners and great horned owls — due to its strong connection with adjacent open desert. In the southern portion of the planning area, the Gila River and its tributaries, including the Hassayampa, Centennial, and Tiger washes, create valuable riparian corridors that support diverse wildlife. These areas attract migratory birds and waterfowl and provide habitat for sensitive species. Federally listed birds such as the southwestern willow flycatcher and western yellow-billed cuckoo rely on the cottonwood and willow stands along the river, while raptors, mule deer, and javelina also depend on the Gila River corridor for movement and foraging. Overall, Buckeye’s planning area contains notable biodiversity, ranging from desert bighorn sheep in the Eagletail Mountains to burrowing owls on the plains, which should be taken into account when evaluating future transportation and land use projects. 3.2 Key Wildlife Corridors in the Buckeye Region: Protecting wildlife corridors, the routes animals use to move between habitat areas, is critical to maintain Buckeye’s biodiversity. These corridors allow wildlife to reach food, water, breeding sites, and seasonal ranges while supporting healthy gene flow. As required by Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS §9- 461.05 for cities and ARS §11-804 for counties), local planning efforts must consider impacts to the environment, including wildlife resources and open space. Studies by the Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD), the White Tank Mountains Conservancy (WTMC), and Maricopa County’s Wildlife Connectivity Assessment have identified several key wildlife corridors in and around Buckeye and are included below. 3.2.1 White Tank Mountains–Belmont Mountains Corridor The Belmont Mountains Corridor links the White Tank Mountains westward to the Belmont Mountains and beyond, providing habitat for mule deer, mountain lions, javelina, coyotes, and desert tortoises while helping to prevent isolation of the White Tanks as development grows. Within this area, the connection between White Tank Mountain Regional Park, the Buckeye Military Reservation, and the Buckeye Flood Retention Structure #1 also supports California leaf-nosed bats, which use mine shafts there for roosting and foraging. Another key segment follows Trilby Wash and the Beardsley Canal, which connects the White Tanks with nearby open spaces and is already recognized in the City of Surprise General Plan for wildlife movement. This corridor faces pressures from urban growth, off-highway vehicle use, military activities, and planned roadway expansions such as Sun Valley Parkway, McDowell Parkway, and the Jackrabbit and Bell Road extensions. Preserving connectivity through coordinated transportation design and wildlife-friendly infrastructure will be essential to keeping this corridor functional. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 72 3.2.2 Gila River Corridor (Buckeye Hills–Sierra Estrella Mountains) The Gila River Corridor runs along Buckeye’s southern boundary, linking the Buckeye Hills with the Sierra Estrella Mountains. The Gila River and its tributaries, including the Hassayampa, Centennial, and Tiger washes, provide valuable riparian habitat for desert bighorn sheep, mule deer, tortoises, waterfowl, and sensitive species such as the southwestern willow flycatcher. Centennial Wash connects the Arlington Wildlife Area and the Gila River to the Bighorn and Saddle Mountains, supporting species like mule deer, bighorn sheep, migratory shorebirds including the Yuma clapper rail, burrowing owls, bats, javelina, mountain lions, and coyotes, while Tiger Wash links the Harquahala Mountains, Bighorn Mountains, and the Harquahala Plain with similar wildlife. These washes function as both linkages and core habitat but face pressures from solar development, urbanization, agricultural water loss, new roads, and barriers created by rail and freeways. Protecting riparian habitat and integrating wildlife-friendly crossings, particularly along SR-85 and future arterials, will be essential for maintaining east–west connectivity in this corridor. 3.2.3 Belmont–Saddle–Gila Bend Mountains Corridor This corridor extends through Buckeye’s western planning area, linking the Belmont Mountains south through Saddle Mountain to the Gila Bend Mountains and the Sonoran Desert National Monument, including the Woolsey Peak and Signal Mountain Wilderness areas. It supports bighorn sheep, mule deer, kit foxes, and desert tortoises, but faces fragmentation pressures from Interstate 10, proposed parkways (including corridors 801 and 404/505), the CAP canal, solar energy projects, arterial roads, and continued urban development. With utility-scale solar and new housing posing significant threats, maintaining this corridor will require proactive transportation planning and design strategies to support wildlife movement and preserve the integrity of this broad desert linkage. 3.2.4 Hassayampa River–Vulture Mountains Corridor Provides a north–south link west of Buckeye, connecting desert habitat near the City with the Vulture Mountains and the Wickenburg area. The river’s floodplain, along with its washes, supports diverse wildlife. However, roads like Sun Valley Parkway and the CAP canal can block movement, making wildlife crossings a priority in future projects. 3.2.5 Wagner Wash Corridor Wagner Wash contributes to regional connectivity by linking habitat between the White Tank Mountains and the Hassayampa River, even though it does not directly connect both areas. This wash supports species such as mule deer, mountain lions, javelina, coyotes, and desert tortoises. It faces pressures from the Sun Valley Parkway, the proposed Turner Parkway, nearby urbanization and new arterial roads, the CAP canal, and growth around Festival Ranch. As this area develops, maintaining open space along Wagner Wash and considering wildlife-friendly infrastructure will be important for sustaining movement through this secondary but valuable corridor. In addition to Wagner Wash, other large riparian corridors within the study area include Jackrabbit Wash, Starr Wash, and Daggs Wash. 3.3 Imagine Buckeye General Plan The adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan includes goals and policies that promote wildlife conservation and ecological connectivity. These policies help identify priority wildlife corridors and encourage transportation designs that protect habitat linkages while balancing future development. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 73 By emphasizing open space, natural preserves, and resource protection, the General Plan supports integrating wildlife-friendly measures into transportation and land use decisions. This framework provides a foundation for coordinating future growth with sustainable wildlife movement. Relevant goals and policies from the adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan are as follows: • Goal G-16 Buckeye’s Generalized Areas for Growth are developed in a manner that promotes the most efficient use of resources and maintains or improves the quality of life for residents. o Policy G-16.6 Rezoning within open spaces should be discouraged, especially where wildlife habitat values are high. • Goal S-20 Buckeye’s recreational opportunities support the diverse needs of the community and economic development. o Policy S-20.1 The City of Buckeye should work with the AZGFD to enhance and/or expand fish and wildlife related recreation opportunities that support the increasing demand for outdoor recreation. o Policy S-20.3 The City of Buckeye should work with the AZGFD to evaluate the economics that wildlife related recreation brings and expand on programs to increase these opportunities, while attracting higher hunting recruitment, school programs, out of City residents, events, and youth outdoor programs. o Policy S-20.4 The City of Buckeye should work with the AZGFD for opportunities to bring wildlife related education, recreation, and events into school or bring schools to the areas managed for this recreation. • Goal ST-1 Buckeye is dedicated to preserving the aesthetic and environmental qualities of the desert. o Policy ST-1.3 The City of Buckeye will continue its collaborative efforts with the Arizona Game and Fish Department, developers, property owners, and advocacy groups, such as the White Tank Mountains Conservancy, to plan, design, and implement solutions for barriers to wildlife passage through washes, drainage ways, and other open space corridors where appropriate. o Policy ST-1.7 In order to actively seek to reduce, avoid, or minimize impacts, the City of Buckeye should work to include a requirement during the initial phases of planning by the developer to consult the Open Space and Trails plan, wildlife linkages, and drainage ordinances to identify where impacts may be potential. • Goal ST-2 Important natural assets are protected from the man-made environment. o Policy ST-2.1 The City of Buckeye should develop a consistent strategy with the Arizona Game and Fish Department for buffering land uses adjacent to natural environments and wildlife habitats, such as river corridors and natural drainageways, to minimize impacts caused by urbanization. Such strategy may include the placement of parks and trails on the fringes of known corridors, to buffer uses and should include requirements under ordinances with a measurable buffer. o Policy ST-2.2 Development, including transportation infrastructure, should limit impacts on the natural environment through mitigation measures, such as buffer zones, open edge treatments, low impact drainage design, and retaining wildlife corridors where appropriate. Impacts should be avoided, minimized, and/or mitigated appropriately in BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 74 consultation with the Arizona Game and Fish Department to inform placements, designs, and monitoring. o Policy ST-2.6 The City of Buckeye should provide for wildlife crossings where needed in the transportation plan. o Policy ST-2.7 New development should provide appropriate buffers and/or setbacks when adjacent to wildlife corridors or protected natural open space. • Goal ST-16 Residents in Buckeye have access to healthy food options. o Policy ST-16.5 The City of Buckeye should encourage the use of appropriate edible landscaping (agriscaping) to provide additional food resources for residents and wildlife. 3.4 Conceptual Wildlife Linkages The Conceptual Wildlife Linkage (CWL) report reflects biological recommendations developed from Arizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD) research and established linkage design guidelines. Its purpose is to maintain sustainable connections for wildlife moving through critical ecological landscapes. Within the City of Buckeye, the White Tank and Belmont Mountain ranges represent two of these essential landscapes. As development continues across the West Valley, both existing and planned transportation and land uses will shape the effectiveness of these wildlife corridors. It is important to integrate wildlife connectivity goals into future planning efforts to ensure adequate space and appropriate crossing measures meet the needs of wildlife species and support long-term ecological health. Both ADOT and AZGFD offer guidance on wildlife connectivity, including recommended escape measures, fencing, and crossing structures. Additionally, AZGFD has developed detailed design guidelines, biological mitigation strategies, and general connectivity recommendations through the Biological Overview and Connectivity Report for the Sun Valley Linkage Complex. These recommendations are based on the most current and relevant wildlife research. For a summary of the design recommendations specific to the White Tanks Conceptual Linkage, refer to page 5-11 of the CWL. Wildlife corridor links and their associated minimum widths, lengths, and minimum buffers can be seen in the CWL report from the White Tank Mountains Regional Connectivity Initiative. Factors deciding these minimums include types of species passing through, length of corridor, location of corridor relative to others, and terrain/water features. Please visit the White Tank Mountains Conservancy website for more detailed information. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 75 4. Transit Information in this chapter is currently being evaluated as part of the City’s Transit Study and, thus, not revised as part of this 2025 TMP update. Transit is an integral component of local and regional connectivity as it provides an alternative means of transportation for residents and visitors, eases commute and transportation needs, and increases accessibility. Additionally, an affordable and efficient transit system that meets the needs of all ages and abilities is crucial to the success of the overall transportation network. This chapter provides a recommended long-range plan of action for transit services as Buckeye continues to grow and develop. Transit has historically been an exclusively government-funded transportation service. In recent years private industry has showed increasing interest in public transit including private rideshare and ride hail services and public-private partnership of high-capacity transit services. In Buckeye, public transit may continue to be a government-funded service, including a combination of City and Federal funding sources. Due to this, efforts will be made at the City to maximize the cost-benefit of transit. This long-range plan for transit service includes identification of existing bus stop locations, existing and future transit service types, and existing and future park-n-ride locations that facilitate transportation options for a growing commuter population within Buckeye and in the greater Phoenix region. Continued collaboration with regional partners, such as MAG and Valley Metro, and adjacent jurisdictions will increase such opportunities for visitors to reach key destinations in Buckeye. Valley BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 76 Metro is a regional public transportation agency providing transit services for the greater Phoenix metropolitan area, including Buckeye. Although transit has become largely the responsibility of the City, continued partnerships will be needed. Additionally, this plan considers private transit operations in the form of rideshare and ride hail programs. The City may need to consider partnering with private companies to expand rideshare programs into the City. 4.1 Existing Transit Service Existing transit services in Buckeye consist of scheduled, fixed-route bus service and a vanpool program that originate and end outside the City limits. There are currently two Valley Metro transit routes that serve Buckeye – Route 563 and Route 685. Existing transit routes are shown on Figure 4-1. Regional Route 563 Route 563 is a “Rapid Bus” route that provides commuter service to downtown Phoenix through I-10. Although there is connectivity to downtown Phoenix, service into Buckeye currently ends at the park-n- ride facility located at the intersection of Jackrabbit Trail and McDowell Road. The park-n-ride facility includes 330 parking spaces for vehicles, 80 of which are covered, and bus bays to accommodate buses on Route 563. Park-n-ride on Jackrabbit Trail and McDowell Road; Source: Serbin Studios BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 77 Figure 4-1. Existing Transit Service BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 78 Regional Route 685 Route 685 provides service to Buckeye and beyond. The “Long Trip” service extends outside Buckeye connecting to the Desert Sky Transit Center in Phoenix and the Ajo Transportation Office in Ajo. While Route 685 runs in both an east-west and north-south direction, service is primarily limited to the area south of I-10 and east of SR 85 in Buckeye. Valley Metro Rural Route, Route 685 Bus; Source: Buckeye Transit Plan, Valley Metro, 2016 Local Route 685 circulator The Local Route 685 is the only local transit route serving Buckeye. The “Short Trip” service consists of a circulator trip offered Monday through Friday. The route follows the Regional Route 685 route, but then circles into the downtown area, providing connections to the Buckeye Downtown Library and the Dr. Saide Recreation Center. In addition to fixed route service, Route 685 provides a demand response service where customers can request an off-route pick up within a 3/4-mile distance from the fixed route service. The existing bus stops for Route 685 and 563 are listed in Table 4-1. Table 4-1. Existing Bus Stops Source: Valley Metro. Ride Hail and Rideshare Growing populations and demand for increased connectivity have made private transit services an integral part of the transit network, ride hail services refer to programs that require “hailing” or waving down a vehicle, usually a taxicab or shuttle service, while the vehicle is driving around the City. There are many taxis that extend services in Buckeye, such as Discount Cab and VIP Taxi. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 79 In addition to ride hail providers, there are also rideshare services available in Buckeye. Rideshares refer to programs that require a customer to use a cell phone application to call or schedule a ride. Examples of private rideshares that are used in Buckeye are Uber and Lyft. 4.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan, adopted in 2018, identified transit-related policies, which were developed through an extensive public input process. These policies have been developed into implementation strategies for action in this Transit Chapter. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan establishes broad policy direction relative to the expansion of transit services in Buckeye, including: providing local transit service to activity centers, providing multimodal accessibility improvements that support transit stop locations, supporting regional transportation opportunities (high-capacity transit), integrating transit service with regional and adjacent local service, and encouraging transit ridership where demand will occur including providing options for elderly and special needs residents. Each of these policy recommendations are further explored in this chapter and are addressed in the Service and Route Recommendations (Section 4.6) and the Transit Stop Recommendations (Section 4.7). These relevant policies include: • Goal S-9 Buckeye is a connected community with an efficient multimodal transportation system. o Policy S-9.4 The City of Buckeye should design roads for multimodal accessibility, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. o Policy S-9.6 The City of Buckeye should ensure that transit options are provided to Activity Centers and other destination locations. • Goal S-12 Buckeye’s multimodal system provides alternatives for modes of travel. o Policy S-12.1 The City of Buckeye should integrate the regional transit system with the local Buckeye circulator services. o Policy S-12.2 The City of Buckeye should continue to work with transit agencies and surrounding jurisdictions for expanded transit services. o Policy S-12.4 The City of Buckeye should promote and encourage community-wide transit ridership. o Policy S-12.5 The City of Buckeye should continue to provide transportation options for the elderly and special needs residents. Action 41. Expand City-wide transit circulator service. (Long Term) Action 45. Extend Valley Metro service to Buckeye Municipal Airport. (Long Term) To create a transit system that works with the character of the City, it is important to identify land uses that are compatible with transit. For local circulators and vanpool programs, residential land uses, such as rural, neighborhood, and community master plan, are compatible to support ridership. Because residents will be using these programs to reach destinations, other land uses that would be compatible with these programs include business commerce, employment, and open space. Additionally, Activity Centers, which are areas of dense and mixed-use development, generally provide the ridership to support transit service. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 80 4.3 Multimodal integration Transit is an integral part of the multimodal network in Buckeye. Transit services are used by every-day commuters for accessing jobs or destinations, such as Activity Centers. The Local Bus Recommendations identified in this Transit Chapter utilize arterial and parkway corridors and connect the planned Activity Centers identified in the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan. In general, arterials and parkways should have vehicle priority to carry traffic to the adjacent areas of an Activity Center. Once in the Activity Center, the priority could change to bicycle and pedestrian access. Although bicycle and pedestrian uses will occur within Activity Centers, facilities for both bicycles and pedestrians may be prevalent on or along the roadway. This makes it necessary to have streets that have the capacity to be shared by multiple modes of transportation, including buses. This may include the use of appropriate bicycle lanes, road striping, and/or bus bays. In addition, having a well-coordinated ITS system will be important in maintaining safety near transit stops. Transit is also used as a method for connecting other forms of transportation. This may include transporting travelers to the airport, to commuter rail stops, or to trails. To provide an integrated transportation network for commuters, there should be local transit stops at destinations as well as other high-capacity transportation stops. This would include stops to commuter rail terminals and the Buckeye Regional Airport. While the existing transit system includes routes on highways, this will need to be expanded to other roadways to provide connectivity within the whole Buckeye community. 4.4 Relevant local and regional transit plans Several previous transit studies have been conducted for the Buckeye area. Some studies provide short- range transit recommendations while others provide long-range transit recommendations. MAG, the regional planning agency for the Phoenix metropolitan area, and Valley Metro (the regional transit service provider for the Phoenix metropolitan area) have conducted several transit studies that provide a foundation for the recommended transit system within Buckeye. 2016 Buckeye Transit Plan In conjunction with the City of Buckeye, Valley Metro developed the Buckeye Transit Plan in 2016 to guide short-, mid-, and long-term transit services and transit capital investments in Buckeye. The plan provides an overview of existing transit services in Buckeye and expands upon service recommendations in the Southwest Valley Local Transit System Study (SWVLTSS), conducted by MAG in 2013. The Plan recommendations are divided into short-term, mid-term, and long-term actions, focusing on service expansion for areas south of I-10 and east of SR 85. Short-Term Service Recommendations Technical analysis determined that future conditions in Buckeye would not likely support bus route extensions by 2030; however, the plan does support the continued operation of Local Route 685. The Plan includes short-term recommendations including providing additional trips on Route 563 and providing a flex service to support service needs for locations outside the existing transit service area. Flex services are services that incorporate elements of demand-responsive and fixed-route models and are used in areas that are challenging to serve, including areas with low population and employment densities, dispersed travel patterns, and discontinuous street networks. The Plan also recommends the continued promotion of Valley Metro’s Carpool and Vanpool program which the City currently supports. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 81 Mid-Term Service Recommendations The mid-term service recommendation includes the implementation of a circulator service in Buckeye. The recommended route for the circulator alternative provides connection between Riverside Apartments and Banner Health Center and the areas in between, including Downtown Buckeye. The route originates near Miller Road and Beloat Road/Lower River Road, traveling along MC 85, Southern Avenue, Yuma Road, and Verrado Way before terminating at McDowell Road. Figure 4-2 illustrates the proposed route and bus stop locations for the recommended circulator alternative from the Buckeye Transit Plan. Figure 4-2. Recommended Circulator Alternative with Stop Locations Source: Buckeye Transit Plan, Valley Metro, 2016 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 82 Long-Term Service Recommendations While the mid-term recommendation focused on circulation within Buckeye, the long-term service recommendation focuses on the extensions of local routes into Buckeye from neighboring jurisdictions. As illustrated in Figure 4-3, these routes operate on Buckeye Road (Yuma Road), Van Buren Street, McDowell Road, and Indian School Road, connecting across the Cities of Phoenix, Tolleson, Avondale, Goodyear, and Buckeye. Proposed routes along Van Buren Street, McDowell Road, and Indian School Road would all terminate at Verrado Way; whereas, the proposed route on Buckeye Road (Yuma Road) would connect to Route 685 at Miller Road. Technical analysis determined that the future conditions in Buckeye would not likely support the implementation of these route extensions by 2030; however, the 2016 Buckeye Transit Plan includes a recommendation for periodic reassessment of the timeline for implementation. Figure 4-3. Local Route Extensions Source: Buckeye Transit Plan, Valley Metro, 2016; SWVLTSS, MAG, 2013 Designing Transit Accessible Communities Study The MAG Designing Transit Accessible Communities Study (DTAC Study) was completed in 2013 and provides guidance for local jurisdictions when planning and designing transit stop locations. Although there are no specific recommendations for Buckeye, the DTAC Study provides a best practices approach for future transit stop planning. The transit stop access recommendations are included in Section 4.7 of this Transit Chapter. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 83 Regional Transit Framework Study Update The MAG Regional Transit Framework Study Update (Study Update) is an update from a previously completed 2010 Study. The Study Update identifies and prioritizes future high-capacity transit projects in Maricopa County. High-capacity transit is defined in the Study Update as consisting of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Streetcar, and Light Rail. The Study Update is currently underway and is anticipated to be completed in the summer of 2018 with a planning horizon of 2040. The latest interim Study reports do not indicate an anticipated demand for high-capacity transit service in Buckeye by year 2040; therefore, the Study Update does not currently identify investments of these types in Buckeye. However, the Study Update includes recommendations as to the factors influencing transit demand that have been considered in this Transit Chapter (see Section 4.6). Southwest Valley Local Transit System Study Completed in 2013, the Southwest Valley Transit System Study (SWVLTSS) assessed transit service needs in the Southwest Valley, including Buckeye, Avondale, Goodyear, Litchfield Park, Tolleson, West Phoenix and unincorporated Maricopa County. The study was conducted by MAG in cooperation with Valley Metro and the relevant member jurisdictions. The study provides short-, mid-, and long-range recommendations to enhance the overall transit system throughout the Southwest Valley upon implementation. Recommendations relevant to the City of Buckeye include three timeframes: • Short-range: existing regional route (Route 685) that originates on MC 85 and traverses south through Buckeye, ending in Gila Bend. • Mid-range: potential expansion of a local circulator transit service and extension of the I-10 commuter service to the western extents of the Buckeye city limits. • Long-range: builds upon the mid-range recommendations and additionally includes an arterial fixed route service originating in Tolleson on the Yuma Road alignment and ending at Verrado Way in Buckeye. Long-range recommendations also propose Generalized Flexible Service within Buckeye, south of I-10. The long-range recommendations, which are built off the short- and mid-range recommendations, of the SWVLTSS are illustrated on Figure 4-4. These recommendations were expanded upon in the 2016 Buckeye Transit Plan described previously. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 84 Figure 4-4. SWVLTSS Long-range transit service plan Source: MAG, Southwest Valley Local Transit System Study, 2013 Commuter Rail System Study MAG updated the 2010 MAG Commuter Rail System Study in the fall of 2018. The 2010 Study evaluated the need and feasibility of commuter rail including corridor alternatives in both the East and West Valley of the Phoenix metropolitan area. The update to this plan revises the results of the original study, further analyzing commuter rail corridors that were initially evaluate din 2010. One of the proposed corridors in the West Valley is the Estrella Line, previously the Yuma West in the 2010 plan, which extends west from Phoenix to Buckeye. This 45-mile corridor would be implemented on the existing UPRR line and would include a station/stop near Historic Downtown Buckeye. Other corridors recommended in the 2018 Study evaluated include: Grand Line (connecting downtown Phoenix to Surprise), the Kyrene Line (connecting downtown Phoenix, Tempe, and Chandler), the San Tan line (connecting downtown Phoenix, Tempe, Mesa, Gilbert, and Queen Creek), and the Chandler Corridor. According to the plan, the Estrella Line is proposed to connect from Buckeye to Phoenix. The extension into Buckeye is proposed as a near-term corridor extension and is shown on Figure 4-5. In 2010 MAG completed the Yuma West Commuter Rail Corridor Development Plan which included analysis of existing and future conditions, a conceptual corridor development plan, estimated costs, and BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 85 implementation strategies. This study recommended implementation of the segment connecting to Buckeye between year 2030 and 2040 with 30-minute headways in the peak AM and PM hours and 60- minute headways in the off-peak hours. Figure 4-5. Estrella Line Corridor Railroad Facilities Source: MAG, Commuter Rail Study, 2018 Summary of Local and Regional Transit Plans Of the five previous studies referenced, the Buckeye Transit Plan provides the most relevant recommendations for transit service in the City of Buckeye. The Buckeye Transit Plan included a 14-year planning horizon (Year 2030); therefore, the Buckeye Transit Plan concludes with two key findings, both of which should be consistently revisited and monitored: • Existing development patterns, and the general undeveloped conditions of the community, do not create enough demand to operate a sustainable transit system for much of the Buckeye planning area. • Once development occurs, demand for transit will require a financial commitment. Although some federal and regional funding sources exist, the City would need to provide a local financial match for capital improvement and operating costs. Due to the timing of different route planning activities, the Buckeye Transit Plan does not include a recommendation to connect Route 563 with Route 685, resulting in a noticeable gap in the planned future transit network. The Commuter Rail System Study highlights the potential for additional financial resources to be needed to support commuter rail service in Buckeye. While the financial requirement and governance structure BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 86 have not been determined, the City understands the importance of commuter rail in providing commute solutions and enhancing the quality of life for existing and future residents. Other MAG studies, including the Designing Transit Accessible Communities Study and the Regional Transit Framework Study, do not provide specific recommendations for Buckeye; however, these studies provide valuable best practice solutions that should be used to plan and design Buckeye as the City continues to grow and develop. These are: • Population and Employment Density • Socioeconomic Characteristics • Travel Demand and Traffic • Transit Service Frequency • Transit Stop Accessibility These best practices are summarized in Section 4.5 of this Transit Chapter. Factors Influencing Transit Demand As illustrated in Figure 4-6, demand for transit service is derived from consideration of several factors including population and employment density, socioeconomic characteristics, travel demand and traffic, land use activity, transit service frequency, and transit stop accessibility. Each of these factors described below is an important consideration in future transit route and stop planning as the City of Buckeye continues to develop. Figure 4-6. Factors Influencing Transit Demand Population and Employment Density Historically, areas with a high concentration of jobs or residences tend to provide the ridership to support transit service. Based on the Future Land Use Plan from the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan, population and employment projections were provided for the future buildout of the City. Buckeye’s projected population and employment densities in year 2040 and at buildout are illustrated in Chapter 1, Introduction. The Local Bus Recommendations proposed in this chapter include routes that connect BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 87 planned locations for medium- and high-density residential concentrations with medium- and high- density job concentrations. Socioeconomic Characteristics Among a community’s population there are specific groups that are more likely to use transit, often referred to as transit-dependent or transit-advocates. These populations include, but are not limited to, • zero- to one-vehicle households, • people with disabilities, • households with seniors over the age of 65, • young professionals under the age of 30 (commonly referred to as Millennials), and • low-income residents. The 2016 recommendations from the Buckeye Transit Plan considered these socioeconomic characteristics. Since much of the Buckeye planning area includes undeveloped land, where future socioeconomic groups may live or work in the future cannot be projected; however, population and employment density have been projected as noted in Chapter 1. Future route feasibility planning must consider the location of these socioeconomic groups and how they increase the demand for transit use. Travel Demand and Traffic Roadways with high regional travel demands and high volumes of traffic, tend to provide the ridership to support regional transit service as individuals will seek alternative solutions to sitting in traffic. Locating transit service with dedicated lanes or traffic signal priority along these routes can provide an alternative means of transportation and encourage individuals to ride transit rather than drive a personal vehicle. These routes can help to reduce travel stress for individuals and provide relief to traffic congestion on roadways. The Local Bus Recommendations identified in this Transit Chapter are located along Arterial and Parkway corridors, which are anticipated to experience higher vehicular traffic volumes than the neighboring Collector or Local roadways. Land Use Activity In all communities, areas with denser, mixed use development patterns and pedestrian-friendly environments tend to provide the ridership to support transit service. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identifies six activity centers: • Buckeye Highlands • White Tank Mountain Resort • Buckeye Airport Employment • Historic Downtown Buckeye • Buckeye Gateway • Buckeye Hills These planned Activity Centers will be vibrant mixed-use areas providing destination locations. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan recommends creation of specific area plans for each Activity Center which would provide additional detail into the land uses, planning concepts, and local multimodal solutions for the Activity Center. These future Activity Centers should be supported by transit service and may be ideal locations for transfers between transit routes. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 88 Transit Service Frequency The size of the travel market for a transit stop is directly related to the density of development within a one-quarter to one-half mile travel envelope from the transit stop, unless otherwise specified by the City engineer. This is commonly considered the longest distance transit users will walk to access a stop location. Frequency of transit service is typically derived from the travel market for that stop location. To maintain good service for transit dependent riders and attract individuals who are not transit- dependent, transit service must be frequent, with buses arriving every 10- to 15-minutes; however, it is common to find transit stops with 30 minute or longer frequencies. The Buckeye Transit Plan includes recommendations for 30-minute service frequency (headways) for the local circulator service (Route 563). As the population and employment densities increase in Buckeye with additional anticipated development, service frequencies should be shortened to a 10- to 15-minute headway. Transit Stop Accessibility Transit Stop Accessibility has a socioeconomic focus on the needs of individuals identified in the Socioeconomic Characteristics section. Stop accessibility addresses the segment of an individual’s trip between an origin or destination and the transit system or stop, specifically eliminating the barriers transit riders face when accessing transit stops. Valley Metro’s Bus Stop Inventory and Design Guidelines provides guidance on the placement and design of bus stops throughout the metropolitan region. Additionally, in 2013 MAG published the Designing Transit Accessible Communities Study (DTAC Study) that provides guidance related to transit stop area amenities. According to the DTAC Study, in the MAG region, approximately 90 percent of all transit users arrive at a transit stop by walking or biking to the stop location. The environment around transit stops is a significant factor influencing real or perceived issues of safety for transit riders. Key factors affecting transit accessibility include: o Lighting o Shade o Information Signage o Adjacent Land Uses o Wayfinding o Bicycle Access o Seating o Pedestrian Crossings o Shelter o Sidewalk The DTAC Study includes a Transit Accessibility Toolkit that identifies recommended improvements according to the development character of each stop area and should be considered in future transit stop planning. Bus stops should be located at the far side of intersections so to not back up the right turn movement at intersections. Bus stop should be located within 600’ of an intersection crosswalk to provide a safe crossing location across a street. Local serving transit stops should be spaced approximately every 1/4 mile to cover the market shed for transit service and should include a bus bay so buses do not cause intersection congestion. For high capacity transit routes (i.e. bus rapid transit or light rail) stop locations should be less frequent, approximately one to two miles. High capacity transit routes and stop typically BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 89 do not require a bus bay as the bus rapid transit or light rail service should be provided with a dedicated lane. It is the recommendation of this TMP that the City require developers to pay the cost of implementing the transit stop facilities including design and construction of the bus bay, shelter pad, sidewalk, and lighting adjacent to their property. 4.5 Service and Route Recommendations Expanded transit services will provide Buckeye residents with increased mobility options for commuting, whether for work, shopping, or leisure. The expansion of transit services will reduce the reliance of personal vehicles, thereby reducing the congestion and maintenance burden on the roadway network. The proposed service and route recommendations were developed by incorporating previous transit plan recommendations and through the identification of areas with projected medium- to high- density population and employment when Buckeye is at full buildout. These service and route recommendations guide future transit service enhancements including those for buses and commuter rail networks. The Transit network component was created by determining the locations of trip generators and higher density land uses identified in the planned future build out in the City’s General Plan. Although targeted service areas and regional stop locations are identified, the Transit network does not identify local bus stop locations, which are typically determined once a build out development pattern is established. Actual demand for transit service is a function of population density, employment density, and specific socioeconomic groups that are likely to utilize transit service. Given much of Buckeye is not yet developed, the following transit planning for route operations could not be conducted as part of this Transit Plan: o Service Frequency o Hours of Operations o Specific Local Bus Stop Locations o Fleet Requirements The Transit Plan includes four types of expanded transit services: a commuter rail route, rapid transit routes, fixed route bus services, and carpool and vanpool programs. The proposed routes are described in the following sections and shown on Figure 4-7. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 90 Figure 4-7. Transit Plan Recommendations Source: City of Buckeye, Matrix Design Group, 2018. Rapid Bus Recommendations Not to be confused with Bus Rapid Transit, Rapid bus transit is a Valley Metro brand name describing commuter express transit service. Rapid bus transit is transit service that is generally located on highways and operates during high-traffic commuting hours in a municipality. Rapid bus transit has the following characteristics: • Riders of rapid bus transit board and await buses at park-n-ride facilities throughout the region. • Typically, rapid bus transit does not include local bus stops along their service routes. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 91 • Due to higher travel speeds and fewer stops, rapid bus transit has less travel time than local buses, yet can travel long distances. • Rapid bus transit may be developed on existing rights-of-way of transportation corridors or may be developed on exclusive rights-of-way. A recommendation is to implement rapid transit routes and services to meet commuter growth throughout the City. As illustrated in Figure 4-7, the proposed routes for rapid transit connects Buckeye from north to south and east to west and extends outside the City to provide regional connectivity with other cities in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Within Buckeye, rapid bus transit routes are recommended along the following routes: • Future White Tanks Freeway • Future I-11 Freeway • I-10 Freeway • McDowell Parkway (with 1.5-mile connection on 319th Avenue) • SR 85 (connecting through Downtown Buckeye, terminating at Jackrabbit Trail park-n-ride) • Sun Valley Parkway Ultimately, the combination of these six routes will accommodate commuters accessing jobs outside of Buckeye in Gila Bend, Ajo, and the greater Phoenix region. Local Bus and High Capacity Transit Recommendations Local bus service provides scheduled, fixed-route passenger transportation service. These services include frequent stops throughout the community and on roadways classified as arterials or parkways, providing connectivity between neighborhoods and destinations within the City as well as to other neighboring cities. The recommended local bus routes are intended to supplement existing bus routes in Buckeye and connect destinations across the Buckeye planning area including important connections to rapid transit bus stops. Figure 4-7 depicts the recommended local bus routes in the Buckeye transit network. As Buckeye continues to develop, additional transit feasibility studies will need to be conducted to determine the implementation phasing and operation of transit routes, specific stop locations, service frequencies, and hours of operation. Additionally, the City should study if high capacity transit, such as bus rapid transit or light rail transit could be supported in the future. Along the streets identified as local bus routes, additional right-of-way should be reserved for dedicated lane service via a Bus Rapid Transit system or fixed rail transit system (i.e. light rail or streetcar). The additional right-of-way necessary should be one lane of travel in each travel direction (approximately 24’ total). Given the ability to dedicate a full lane to transit service, no additional right-of-way would be needed for bus bays along the corridor. Carpool and Vanpool Program Recommendations The City of Buckeye is anticipated to continue participating in Valley Metro’s two Commute Solution Services: Carpool Program and Vanpool Program. The Carpool Program assists commuters with matching riders with similar commutes to carpool. Participants in the Carpool Program agree upon the time and location to meet, vehicle to use, and any compensation for the driver of the vehicle. The Vanpool Program provides groups of six to 15 people with a passenger van. In the Vanpool Program, one of the qualified participants volunteers to be the driver and each rider pays a monthly fee to cover vehicle BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 92 maintenance and fuel. As the city limits of Buckeye continue to expand, so too will the service areas for the City’s Carpool and Vanpool Programs. 4.6 Transit Stop Recommendations Future transit stop facilities will consist of park-n-ride facilities, bus stops, and a commuter rail station, each of which provide a different type of transit service. Each type of transit stop is discussed in the following sections. Local Bus Recommendations Local bus stops provide a pick up and drop off location for passengers on local bus routes. Stop amenities vary and may include a transit shelter, signage, seating, and lighting. Although not identified in this Transit Chapter, future local serving bus stops would occur more frequently than park-n-ride facilities. Only existing bus stops are identified on Figure 4-7 and listed in Table 4-1. Future bus stop locations will be determined as the City develops and only after a further study of route feasibility and operations is conducted, including determining stop locations, service frequency, hours of operation, and fleet requirements. In general, developers should assume a bus stop at every mile along arterials and more frequently where determined by the City Engineer. Provided in Section 4.5 of this Transit Chapter are factors to be considered in future transit stop and route planning. Park-N-Ride Recommendations Park-n-ride facilities are dedicated lots with parking for commuters to park their personal vehicles or bicycles while using transit. Multiple local and rapid bus transit routes would converge at these stops. There are multiple park-n-ride stop recommendations for the Buckeye transit network. An existing park- n-ride is located at Jackrabbit Trail and McDowell Road. Additional park-n-ride facilities should be developed as rapid bus transit routes are established. The Transit Service Recommendations includes seven park-n-ride facilities, which are listed in Table 4-2. Table 4-2 Proposed Transit Hubs Source: City of Buckeye, Matrix Design Group, 2018. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 93 Transit Center Recommendations Transit Centers are locations where multiple transit routes converge and allow the rider to easily transfer between routes. Transit Centers may be located on public property or private property. Transit Centers located on private property require a shared use agreement with the property owner. Ideally future transit centers would be located on private property so to reduce the City’s maintenance costs. Recommended transit center locations are listed in Table 4-2. 4.7 Transit Implementation and Funding The process for implementing an expanded transit system in the form of commuter rail, rapid bus transit, and local bus transit requires the coordination and support of local, regional, and federal agencies. Funding There are several federal formula funds that can be used to partially fund transit costs through the Federal Transit Administration, such as: • Section 5311 – Rural Areas: This program provides capital, planning, and operating assistance to states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations less than 50,000. • Section 5310 – Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities: This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special needs of transit-dependent populations. • Section 5307 – Urbanized Areas: This program provides grants to urbanized areas (over 50,000 population) for public transportation, capital, planning, job access, and reverse commute projects as well as operating expenses in certain circumstances. Portions of Buckeye’s eastern area is within the Avondale-Goodyear Small Urbanized Area (UZA) and it is anticipated that this area will be merged with the Phoenix-Mesa UZA or reclassified as a large UZA after the next decennial census in 2020. After 2020, many of the remaining portions of Buckeye are anticipated to be classified as a small UZA. Depending on how Buckeye is classified following the 2020 U.S. Census will determine the eligibility for transit services in Buckeye under each of the federal formula funds. Whether if Buckeye becomes a small UZA, becomes a large UZA with Avondale-Goodyear, or is merged with Phoenix-Mesa UZA, all funding eligibility will be determined by processes established by MAG. MAG’s Regional Programming Guidelines for Federal Transit Formula Funds provides additional information related to programming decisions for each of the UZAs. The potential extension of Maricopa County’s Proposition 400, the Transportation Excise Tax (TET) set to expire in 2025, is a potential source of funding for transit services at the local level. Revenue from the TET is distributed to the Freeway, Arterial and Transit Life Cycle Programs in percentage of 56.2, 10.5, and 33.3 respectively. The Transit Life Cycle Program (TLCP), maintained by the Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) to implement transit projects in the MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), receives a third of the monthly revenues, which are deposited into the RPTA Public Transportation Fund, and allocated accordingly to the following split: 56.76 percent to bus programs and 43.24 percent to light rail / high-capacity programs. Importantly, there is currently not a dedicated funding source for operations and maintenance. As Buckeye continues to develop and grow, the City’s transportation system, including public transit and the operations and maintenance of that system will grow as well and demand more City funding and BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 94 staff resources. Creation of a transit or transportation tax in Buckeye could provide a sustainable fund for transportation infrastructure maintenance, transit operations, and the required local match for regional, state and federal funding sources. Other potential funding includes Arizona Lottery Funds, Buckeye General Fund, passenger fares, and advertising revenue. Funding commuter rail operations and maintenance requires a combination of local, state, federal and sometimes private funding sources. Although outside sources of funds can be used to initiate and support commuter rail, implementation of commuter rail will require local governments to annually provide funds to meet the ongoing capital, operating, and maintenance costs. Commuter rail is just one form of public transit that could be funded through a public-private partnership (P3) agreement. Additionally, some cities have chosen to operate transit service through a P3 agreement. Implementation This TMP Transit Chapter provides long-range recommendations to determine the potential provision of transit service at full buildout of the Buckeye planning area. Many of these recommendations require additional study once development has occurred. Implementation of these recommendations requires collaboration with regional transportation planning entities, Valley Metro and MAG. Local Bus and High Capacity Transit Recommendations will require future system and route feasibility studies to determine the operations requirements for transit service expansion including bus stop locations, service frequencies, hours of operations, and fleet requirements. Rapid Bus Recommendations require an expanded service agreement between the City and Valley Metro, which should only be undertaken once the density of development would trigger demand for commuter transit. Table 4-3 provides a listing of the Short-term Transit System Recommendations. Table 4-4 provides a listing of the Mid-term Transit System Recommendations. Table 4-5 provides a listing of the Long-term Transit System Recommendations. The planning-level costs and other implementation actions associated with these improvements are included in Chapter 10 Implementation. Table 4-3. Short-Term Transit System Recommendations Source: City of Buckeye, Matrix Design Group, 2018. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 95 Table 4-4. Mid-Term Transit System Recommendations Source: City of Buckeye, Matrix Design Group, 2018. Table 4-5. Long-Term Transit System Recommendations Source: City of Buckeye, Matrix Design Group, 2018. 4.8 Summary Transit service is important for a growing and diverse community. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan includes policies for expanding transit service to the six future Activity Centers and the broader community. This Transit Chapter provides recommendations on several transit service types including Commuter Rail, Rapid Bus Transit, Local Bus and High Capacity Transit, Carpool, and Vanpool. Furthermore, this Transit Chapter provides guidance for future transit stop locations and how to plan for future transit demand. The transit service expansion recommended in this Transit Chapter provides robust service to connect future medium- and high-density residential and employment concentrations across the Buckeye planning area. This Transit Chapter provides long-range recommendations to determine the potential provision of transit service at full buildout of the Buckeye planning area. Many of these recommendations require additional study once development has occurred. Implementation of these recommendations requires collaboration with regional transportation planning entities, Valley Metro and MAG. While regional funding is available through the TLCP, the City must plan to fund the local match required in both the initiation of transit service and for the ongoing maintenance and operation of transit service. Recommendations of this Transit Chapter are incorporated in Chapter 10 (Recommendations and Implementation) of this Transportation Master Plan along with the recommendations of other Transportation Master Plan Elements (Streets, Active Transportation, Aviation, Rail, Freight, and ITS). BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 96 5. Active Transportation Biking, walking, running, hiking, and equestrian are all important to the City of Buckeye’s future as they are a means to address several interrelated challenges, including traffic, air quality, public health, and safety issues, all while creating community gathering space. While the roadways are being sized to adequately move vehicular traffic, the roadway cross section should consider pedestrian, bicycle and overall corridor safety. By planning a transportation network that is safe for pedestrians and bicyclists, the City can positively affect all of these areas, which collectively have a profound influence on quality of life. Quality of life in Buckeye can be influenced by providing opportunities to have an active lifestyle and by providing spaces for community interaction. The active transportation component in the City of Buckeye’s transportation network includes facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other physical activities, such as equestrian activity. Providing for pedestrian and bicyclist use presents an alternative and active form of transportation for commuting and for recreational activities, both of which support healthy communities. Additional detailed recommendations for pedestrian and bicycle networks are further described in the 2019 City of Buckeye Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Buckeye in Motion Transportation Master Plan closely coordinated with the Buckeye At Play Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2025. For more information regarding Buckeye’s 2025 At Play Parks and Recreation Master Plan visit the Parks and Recreation section on the City of Buckeye website. This Active Transportation Chapter includes the following sections: • Section 5.1 Existing Active Transportation Facilities. Active transportation infrastructure that exists in Buckeye. • Section 5.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan. Active Transportation and related Land Use Goals and Policies from the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan. 4 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 97 • Section 5.3 Multimodal Integration. Strategies for integration of active transportation facilities within Buckeye. • Section 5.4 Relevant Active Transportation Plans. Relevant previous plans and studies that support the recommendations of the Active Transportation Chapter. • Section 5.5 Factors Influencing Active Transportation. Factors that create demand for active transportation facilities, healthy community indicators, understanding latent demand, understanding trip types, and pedestrian/ bicycle friendly streets and communities. • Section 5.6 Active Transportation Recommendations. The foundation for determining future active transportation facilities to be further examined in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan update process. • Section 5.7 Implementation and Funding. Implementation and the potential funding sources for the Active Transportation Chapter. • Section 5.8 Chapter Summary. Summary of the Active Transportation Chapter. 5.1 Existing Active Transportation Facilities Buckeye’s current active transportation network consists of a combination of on-street bicycle facilities, sidewalks, paths, and trails that are owned and maintained by various entities, including the City of Buckeye, Maricopa County, and local homeowner’s associations (HOAs). Existing active transportation facility types in Buckeye include on-street facilities, off-street facilities, and sidewalks. Table 5-1 below lists the total miles of each facility type in the City of Buckeye. These numbers were derived from the 2025 Buckeye at Play Parks and Recreation Master Plan and do not account for recent growth in the City over the last five years. A future update to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will account for this growth. Each of these facility types are shown in Figure 5-1 and described below. Table 5-1. Existing Active Transportation Facilities Facility Type Location Miles Bike Lane On-Street 21 Bike Route On-Street 40 Paved Shoulder On-Street 50 Multi-Use Path – Unpaved Off-Street 27 Multi-Use Path – Paved Off-Street 24 Recreational Trail Off-Street 22 Source: City Of Buckeye Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan, 2019 and Buckeye At Play, 2025 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 98 Figure 5-1 Existing Active Transportation Facilities BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 99 On-Street Bicycle Facilities On-street bicycle facilities in Buckeye consist of bike lanes, bike routes, and paved shoulders. Although there are various bicycle facility types within Buckeye, there is not a complete network for this mode of active transportation. The longest cycling routes consist of facilities that lack dedicated space for bicycle use, such as bike routes and paved shoulders along Parkways, where traffic speeds may pose real or perceived safety concerns for cyclists. According to the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NATCO), speed plays a role in the cause and severity of crashes – there is a direct correlation between higher speeds, the risk of crashing, and the severity of injuries from crashes. While the design of the roadways should consider the speeds that are associated with the types of street classification, the use of roadways for bicycle use shall also be done in accordance with ARS 28-815 which sets regulations for bicycling on roadways. Each of the on-street bicycle facility types are described below: Bike Routes Bike Routes, also referred to as share the road or “sharrow” facilities, are the most widely implemented facility types in the United States. The appeal to municipalities is that they are very inexpensive and generally require no capital improvements to the roadway width. Bike routes require careful considerations in terms of streets in which they are incorporated. This treatment is typically reserved for streets with low traffic volumes and slower speeds as the travel lanes are shared by both vehicles and bicycles. Motorists and cyclists can become confused as to who has right-of-way within the travel lane, so these facilities are often accompanied by share the road signage (which should consider the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration guidance or as otherwise guided by the City), bike route signage, pavement markings, and/or ordinance signage. A designated bike route exists only on Sun Valley Parkway. Paved Shoulders Paved shoulders are often used to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians on rural roads where volumes of traffic are relatively low. If a roadway shoulder is frequently used by cyclists, it is recommended that supplemental bicycle signage be added and regular street sweeping be conducted to clear debris from the road shoulders. Bike Lanes Bike lanes are separate marked lanes that typically occur on higher volume and higher speed roadways and can be relatively inexpensive bicycle treatments that can go a long way in helping to increase Level of Service (LOS) for bicyclists. Given roadway conditions, particularly geometry, roadway width, traffic volume, and number of travel lanes, bike lanes can be installed economically. One of the largest advantages of implementing bike lanes is that they delineate separate travel lanes for cyclists and drivers. Additionally, bike lanes are easily recognizable to drivers and help to visually communicate City ordinances in relation to shared right-of-way use. In December 2025, AASHTO released the Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, providing guidance on planning, designing, and implementing separated bike lanes to enhance cyclist safety and comfort. The guide emphasizes the use of physical barriers, such as curbs and flexible delineators, to create a dedicated space for cyclists, particularly on high-speed or high-volume roads. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 100 Bike lanes are found throughout 15 different roadways in Buckeye. The longest bike lane segments can be found on portions of Verrado Way, Yuma Road, Lower Buckeye Road, and Tartesso Parkway. Off-Street Facilities Off-street active transportation facilities in Buckeye consist of multi-use paths and recreational trails. Multi-use paths and trails provide low-stress and recreational routes for a bicycle and pedestrian network. Paths and trails in Buckeye have multiple uses, such as hiking, walking, mountain biking, and equestrian use. Multi-Use Paths Multi-use paths are off-street facilities reserved for the use of pedestrians and bicyclists exclusively and typically consist of a paved surface treatment. Multi-use paths can serve local trips and are often preferred by non-experienced bicycle riders and families riding together. Trails Trails are a recreational facility that have an unpaved surface treatment (i.e. crushed gravel or dirt). Trails are typically designed for recreational riders and do not serve local trip options. Trail users can include non-experienced riders as well as experienced riders (i.e. mountain bike riders and equestrians). City owned trail facilities are limited to those in Skyline Regional Park, Sundance Park, and Earl Edgar Recreational Facility. While City owned paths and trails are somewhat limited, several of the community master plans in Buckeye have paths or trails that connect parks and greenbelts. Additionally, Maricopa County and other regional and state entities own and maintain trails within Buckeye. In summary, trails in Buckeye can be found at/along: o Skyline Regional Park o Hassayampa River o Buckeye Hills Regional Park o Amber Lasso Trail o Gila River o Wildlife Corridors o White Tank Mountain Regional Park o Maricopa Trail o Sonoran Desert National Monument o Sundance residential community o Central Arizona Project (CAP) o Watson Road and Miller Road North/ South Connections o The Roosevelt Canal from 187th Avenue to Yuma Road Sidewalks Although not illustrated in Figure 5-1 or listed in Table 5-1, many roadways within Buckeye include sidewalks. Unlike bicycle facilities, pedestrian facility design does not have a great variation. Typically, pedestrians travel along four different route types: detached sidewalks, attached sidewalks, multi-use paths and trails, and footpaths. Footpaths are locations where pedestrians may travel and are unconstructed or not engineered, and typically indicate a need for a formalized walking environment to be constructed (e.g. sidewalk or multi-use path/trail). Existing sidewalks in Buckeye are typically a hard surface available for pedestrian use. In a public survey for the City of Buckeye Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (2019), 85 percent of respondents shared that they would prefer sidewalks for commuting rather than multi-use paths (15%). Although the City’s street design standards recommend sidewalks or BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 101 paths along all roadways, some existing roadways are not built to the current City’s street design standards and do not yet include a dedicated pedestrian environment. These roadways were likely built prior to the adoption of the City’s current requirements, are part of a Community Master Plan that has its own standards, or built to County standards and then annexed into the City. Both detached sidewalks and attached sidewalks are present in the City of Buckeye. Each of these facility types are described as follows. Detached Sidewalks Detached sidewalks are sidewalks that incorporate a buffer between the traffic lane and the pedestrian zone. These buffers can be merely concrete extensions of the sidewalk or landscaped with textured surfaces or trees. The intent is to provide a buffer between the vehicle and pedestrian zones. Attached Sidewalks Attached sidewalks are sidewalks that do not incorporate a buffer between the traffic lane and the pedestrian zone. Instead, they are directly abutting the edge of the roadway. Attached sidewalks are typically used as the minimum standard for pedestrian accessible facilities, but can be an effective strategy to include pedestrian facilities along roadways in a cost-effective manner as they take up less space compared to detached sidewalks. Though they are compliant with the street design standards, attached sidewalks offer less pedestrian protection, are not multi-directional (when constructed to a 10’ width), and can be perceived as low comfort for pedestrians given the proximity to moving traffic. 5.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan The adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identified goals and policies relevant to active transportation. Of all the Transportation Master Plan elements, active transportation has the most policy guidance. This policy guidance will be valuable in identifying additional active transportation routes and facility enhancements in a future Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan update. These policies convey that active transportation is compatible with the various land uses in the City of Buckeye, especially open space. Many of the policies in the adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan are related to providing links to different open spaces in the form of paths and trails. There is also a need expressed in the General Plan to provide connectivity between neighborhoods and neighborhood destinations, such as commercial areas. This makes both residential and business commerce land uses compatible with active transportation as well. These active transportation related goals and policies provide a foundation for future active transportation network planning and underline the importance of active transportation infrastructure as well as the role that development plays in building the network. Relevant goals and policies from the adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan are as follows: • Goal G-1 To guide a pattern of land uses that provides opportunities for diverse, active lifestyles, and excellent quality of life. o Policy G-1.6 The City of Buckeye will work with Maricopa County and adjacent cities to encourage land uses that are compatible with the City’s future open space and trails, as well as the Parks and Recreation Master Plan update (ongoing). • Goal G-4 Mixed-use land patterns are developed in appropriate areas throughout the community. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 102 o Policy G-4.2 Mixed-use projects should only be designed to support walkability and livability through complete streets concepts, amenities, and services. • Goal G-9 Buckeye has an expansive and diverse economy. o Policy G-9.8 The City of Buckeye should take advantage of natural resource and outdoor recreation assets adjacent and within the future City for ecotourism and outdoor recreation uses. • Goal G-19 Buckeye has attractive, high quality, and healthy neighborhoods. o Policy G-19.2 The City of Buckeye should promote the development of active communities that are designed to promote pedestrian and bike usage and provide equitable and convenient access to parks, schools, recreation facilities, other public facilities, and shopping areas that are interconnected by trails. • Goal S-9 Buckeye is a connected community with an efficient multimodal transportation network. o Policy S-9.2 New development should provide active transportation facilities, such as pedestrian paths, bike paths, and trails that enhance connectivity between community green spaces and to regional parks and the Maricopa County trail system. o Policy S-9.4 The City of Buckeye should design roads for multimodal accessibility, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. o Policy S-9.5 Collector streets should continue and connect community master plans to provide alternative pedestrian, bike, and transportation routes without dependency on the arterial network. • Goal S-10 Buckeye has a regional approach to transportation planning. o Policy S-10.4 The City of Buckeye should work with MCDOT to assess the future viability of attached or detached bicycle and pedestrian paths on Sun Valley Parkway. o Policy S-10.5 The City of Buckeye should seek intergovernmental agreements with canal districts, utility providers, and the flood control district for shared use of maintenance roads for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Goal S-14 The bicycling and pedestrian circulation system is a well-connected and maintained network, enabling access to all parts of the City. o Policy S-14.1 The City of Buckeye should utilize its Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2019) and the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan update (ongoing) for guidance. o Policy S-14.2 The City of Buckeye will promote the development of a comprehensive and safe system of recreational and commuter bicycle routes that provide access to key destinations, including community facilities (such as schools, libraries, and parks), shopping areas, jobs, and activity centers, with appropriate linkages to neighborhoods. o Policy S-14.3 The City of Buckeye should connect parks to planned bicycle routes and recreation corridors, including trails, such as along the Hassayampa River, Gila River, and to Skyline Park and White Tank Mountains Regional Park. o Policy S-14.4 The City will develop a comprehensive multimodal transportation plan supports all modes of transportation within the transportation network. o Policy S-14.5 The City of Buckeye should provide bicycle access in and near Activity Centers, neighborhoods, community centers, parks, and other appropriate destinations. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 103 o Policy S-14.6 The City of Buckeye will require new development to provide and maintain appropriate bicycle infrastructure such as bicycle racks, lockers, lanes, and paths. o Policy S-14.7 The City of Buckeye should ensure that streets in Activity Centers support high levels of pedestrian activity. • Goal ST-1 Buckeye is dedicated to preserving the aesthetic and environmental qualities of the desert. o Policy ST-1.7 In order to actively seek to reduce, avoid, or minimize impacts, the City of Buckeye should work to include a requirement during the initial phases of planning by the developer to consult the Open Space and Trail plan, wildlife linkages, and drainage ordinances to identify where impacts may be potential. • Goal ST-4 Buckeye upholds a standard of high-quality design in the built-environment. o Policy ST-4.1 Activity Centers should be developed with a focus on walkability, bikeability, and overall pedestrian connectivity. o Policy ST-4.3 Where possible, new development should minimize surface parking and design projects to encourage use of alternate modes of transportation. • Goal ST-5 Buckeye has a network of paths and trails that provide local and regional links. o Policy ST-5.1 The City of Buckeye should develop a comprehensive network of paths and trails between natural and man-made linear features, such as canals and powerline corridors, to provide connectivity between open spaces. o Policy ST-5.2 The City of Buckeye should provide multi-use paths and trails between parks and other passive and active recreational facilities. o Policy ST-5.3 The City of Buckeye should encourage paths between planned communities and trail networks. o Policy ST-5.4 The City of Buckeye will coordinate with adjacent cities and Maricopa County to establish connections with trails identified in their parks or trails Master Plans. o Policy ST-5.5 The City of Buckeye will partner with Maricopa County to develop the Maricopa Trail through Buckeye’s MPA and ensure linkages to the trail as well as regional parks in coordination with the TMP. o Policy ST-5.6 The City of Buckeye should prioritize open space connectivity between natural resources, such as Rivers to Ridges, by connecting the White Tank Mountains south to the Gila River and west to the Hassayampa River. • Goal ST-11 Neighborhoods in Buckeye are unified while maintain their own unique character. o Policy ST-11.3 The City of Buckeye should utilize paths, trails, open space, and community facilities to link neighborhoods. o Policy ST-8.3 The City of Buckeye should encourage developers to maximize the use of native vegetation for shade around buildings, parking surfaces, and sidewalks to reduce heat absorption and energy used for cooling. The City should also encourage the retention of natural wash corridors and open spaces to reduce heat absorption and energy used for cooling. • Goal ST-14 Buckeye is an active City with programs and facilities that enable healthy lifestyles. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 104 o Policy ST-14.2 The City of Buckeye should plan neighborhoods to be within ¼ mile to ½ mile of a pocket or neighborhood parks and paths and trails that connect them into a system. o Policy ST-14.5 The City of Buckeye should provide a system of off-street paths and trails that connect parks and open spaces with residential and commercial areas. The policies state available community assets including general destinations to connect, specific destinations to connect, possible infrastructure to be utilized to make these connections, and supporting infrastructure to be provided. Each of these asset types are summarized in Table 5-2. Table 5-2. Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan Policy Guidance 5.3 Multimodal Integration Many of Buckeye’s active transportation facilities, both existing and planned, are located within parks or designed to connect open spaces, creating opportunities for recreational activity. While active transportation trails and pathways should be connected to one another, there should also be connections from these recreational facilities to the sidewalk network along roadways and within activity centers. As noted in Section 5.1, there are many types of sidewalks that are located in the transportation network, including attached and detached sidewalks, as well as on-street and off-street bicycle facilities. These connections are important for creating pedestrian and cyclist connectivity throughout the City; however, they are also imperative for improving connections to other high-capacity transportation options, such as buses or commuter rail. To better support a transit system, sidewalks and paths should provide first and last mile connections as well as connections to mobility hubs. 5.4 Relevant Active Transportation Plans Active transportation networks have been identified by the City of Buckeye and other agencies. The City of Buckeye provided plans for paths and trails in the 2025 Parks and Recreation Master Plan and integrated those plans with an on-street network of potential bike lanes and routes in the 2025 Bicycle BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 105 and Pedestrian Master Plan. MCDOT and MAG have also provided plans for bicycle and pedestrian networks through their own Active Transportation Plans within the Buckeye area. Buckeye At Play Parks and Recreation Master Plan, 2025 The Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan is a long-range plan that identifies key initiatives, policies, and implementation strategies to guide Buckeye’s Community Services Department projects and services over the next 10+ years. The purpose of the plan is to offer strategies, recommendations, and operational guidelines that will allow the City to meet the needs of current and future City of Buckeye residents. 2025 Buckeye at Play Parks and Recreation Master Plan sought to establish vision, strategies, and an implementation plan to provide a safe, convenient, and connected bicycle and pedestrian network which was identified as a primary goal in the adopted Buckeye 2040 General Plan. Figure 5-2 is a map which shows the bike lanes and routes that existed at the time the BPMP (Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan) 2019 was published, and the recommended potential bike lanes and routes, resulting in the overall on-street network. To carry out this mission, the plan has been organized around the following goals: • Create a comprehensive and compelling vision and direction for Parks and Recreation • Propose various approaches for accommodating growth while keeping the fiscal picture in balance • Strategically identify gaps and prioritize future improvements and programming for Parks and Recreation • Assess current and desired service levels to strategically approach population growth sustainably as a department • Understand potential partnership opportunities and funding options • Evaluate operations and maintenance practices with an aim to generate long-term sustainability, efficiencies, and resilience benefits BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 106 Figure 5-2. Existing and Potential Bike Routes Source: 2019 Buckeye Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 107 Figure 5-3, below, shows the network of paths and trails, and the supporting trailheads recommended in the BPMP. Figure 5-3. Off-Street – Paths and Trails Source: 2019 Buckeye Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 108 Vision and Goals The BPMP cites the following Vision statement: “The City of Buckeye is a community where walking or riding a bike is a comfortable and convenient transportation choice for residents and visitors of all ages and abilities.” It includes 5 goals: • Goal 1 Improve Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians through infrastructure improvements and safety programs. • Goal 2 Improve Connectivity within the community by linking residents and visitors with activity centers, employment areas, recreational facilities, corridors and opportunities for transit. • Goal 3 Improve Convenience of the bicycle and pedestrian network to connect people with transit corridor hubs and stops. • Goal 4 Improve Awareness and Use of the bicycle and pedestrian network through awareness programs, events and other public engagement activities. • Goal 5 Improve Maintenance to enhance use of the network through the use of low maintenance materials and design considerations with the objective of reducing overall maintenance costs. The BPMP also provides a table detailing 213 separate projects by name, responsible party/partners, and recommendations split into short-, mid-, and long-term sections, comprising every individual segment of lane and trail shown on the above maps. Please refer to the BPMP for more detail on bicycle, pedestrian, and trail information. City of Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan The City of Buckeye adopted Buckeye At Play Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2025 which provides a framework for parks, paths, trails, and open spaces in Buckeye. The plan includes a robust network of planned trail and path facilities along washes, rivers, canals, utility corridors, and flood control channels and structures. The plan identified classifications of paths, including Primary Trail/Path, Secondary Path, and Accessible Trail, all of which should be ADA-accessible. The location of Primary Trails/Paths and Secondary Paths are displayed in Figure 5-5. The description of each classification of path or trail is as follows: • Primary Paths/Trails. These provide the highest level of functionality for a wide range of users, including hikers, mountain bikers, and equestrians. Primary Paths/Trails incorporate both hard and soft surfaces to support a multitude of activities and are intended to connect regional parks and natural resources to communities, neighborhoods, and other major destinations. • Secondary Paths. These facilities are intended for more localized use as they connect neighborhoods to community parks, schools, commercial nodes, and employment centers. Secondary paths have hard surfaces and serve both transportation and recreation needs. • Accessible Trails. These trails consist of compacted and stabilized decomposed granite and allow for a more natural experience to users in developed areas of Buckeye. Accessible trails will predominately be constructed along powerline corridors. The 2025 Parks and Recreation Master Plan also located primary and secondary trailheads, which are identified on Figure 5-5. In total, there are eight major (primary) trailheads and 21 minor (secondary) trailheads in Buckeye. The differences between major and minor trailheads include the size of trailhead, BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 109 the amount of parking spaces, the provision of restrooms, lighting, and ramadas, and whether equestrian use is allowed. As the City experiences growth in the transportation network, these numbers are likely to increase in an update to the 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan provides 19 implementation measures over the next 10 years and the responsible parties, which include City departments, developers, sand and gravel companies, other governmental agencies, development communities, and homeowner associations. These implementation measures are being followed by the City of Buckeye to efficiently develop a city-wide trail network. Classifications and guidelines for trails are shown below in Figure 5-4 . Figure 5-4. Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Pathways & Trails Classifications and Guidelines Source: Buckeye At Play Parks and Recreation Master Plan, 2025 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 110 Figure 5-5. Planned Primary and Secondary Trail Network BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 111 MCDOT Active Transportation Plan In 2018, MCDOT updated its Active Transportation Plan (ATP), which replaces the 1999 Bicycle Transportation System Plan. The ATP is the planning document for the active transportation network, which includes the pedestrian and bicycle network, and will guide decisions and investments for active transportation within unincorporated Maricopa County. The MCDOT Active Transportation Plan identifies both pedestrian and bicycle facility needs throughout the county. Table 5-3 lists the identified pedestrian and bicycle network needs in Buckeye and Figure 5-6 and Figure 5-7 show these needs respectively. Table 5-3. MCDOT Active Transportation Plan - Pedestrian and Bicycle Needs in Buckeye Source: MCDOT Active Transportation Plan, 2018 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 112 Figure 5-6. MCDOT Active Transportation Plan: Pedestrian Network Needs Source: MCDOT Active Transportation Plan, 2018 Figure 5-7. MCDOT Active Transportation Plan: Bicycle Network Needs Source: MCDOT Active Transportation Plan, 2018 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 113 MAG Active Transportation Plan MAG published an Active Transportation Plan in 2020, which serves as a regional plan that will guide a regional bicycle and pedestrian network. The Plan identified potential new routes and investments for bicycles and pedestrians which emphasized transit connections, quality of life factors, and safety. 5.5 Factors Influencing Active Transportation Demand for active transportation is derived from consideration of several factors, including healthy community indicators, latent demand for active transportation, active transportation trip types, safer streets, and higher quality of life for community members. Healthy Community Indicators Public health and urban planning research indicate that impacts of automobiles on public health extend beyond air quality concerns to concerns about a lack of physical activity resulting from auto-oriented development patterns. The resulting consequence is various health-related issues including obesity and other chronic diseases such as coronary heart disease, stroke and diabetes. Research also indicates that pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly environments often lead to a more active and healthy lifestyle. As a result of this research many public health professions and organizations have begun advocating for the creation of pedestrian-friendly and bicycle-friendly communities. Healthy Community Indicators are measurable ways of encouraging improved public health conditions. Health Community Indicators include access to recreation and open space, community design, and air quality. Each of these Healthy Community Indicators are described below. • Access to recreation and open space. Residents who live near or have access to open space and recreation areas have been shown to have reduced risks of heart disease, stress, and an improved mood by giving residents the opportunity to participate in active lifestyles. In addition to park facilities, the provision of sidewalks, paths, trails, and bicycle facilities provide an important link in the open space network, connecting residents to a City’s many recreation facilities and open spaces. • Community design. The design of the built environment, including transportation facilities, affects how residents utilize the City and engage in the community. On average a community’s transportation network comprises approximately 20 percent of a city’s limits. Furthermore, on average, the transportation network consists of approximately 80 percent of all land owned by a city. Therefore, the transportation network provides a unique opportunity to influence community design. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan should provide context sensitive solutions that support community design goals. • Air quality. Maintaining good air quality is necessary for the overall health of the community as well as the attractiveness of the City. Air quality can also affect residents’ ability to have active lifestyles. When a person chooses to walk or bike, they are typically removing one car from the road. With a more appealing biking and walking environment, a larger number of local trips can safely be made on foot, including shopping, restaurants, school, and recreational trips. This change in transportation choice has a positive cumulative impact on improving air quality and reducing congestion. Poor air quality and air pollution have public health consequences including asthma and other respiratory conditions. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 114 These three indicators are significant in planning active transportation networks. As Buckeye continues toward their goal of becoming a pedestrian- and bike-friendly community, the City will witness a higher proportion of residents choosing to exercise and achieve increased activity levels, therefore increasing overall quality of life. Latent Demand for Active Transportation Latent demand is a methodology to determine if individuals will use the built infrastructure. Understanding areas within the City of Buckeye with the highest opportunity for active transportation trips is critical for developing a multimodal transportation network and in determining high-priority areas. Furthermore, prioritizing where people are most likely to walk or bike can be an effective way to prioritize implementation and funding. By understanding a combination of factors including infrastructure, land use types, and population data, the City can better determine where active transportation trips are most likely to occur. This origin and destination information will be used to determine where existing gaps exist in the multimodal transportation network. Provided in Table 5-4 are common origin and destination factors in determining latent demand for active transportation. Table 5-4. Active Travel Origins and Destination Locations Active Transportation Trip Types Active transportation systems typically consist of three common trip types: commuting, recreation (both on-road and off-road), and local trips. Commuters are those that use active transportation facilities to get to and from work or school. Recreational users are those that use active transportation facilities for exercise or enjoyment, and local trip users are those that use active transportation facilities as a means to get to and from shopping, healthcare, entertainment, and other daily activities. Each active transportation facility user not only prefers different facility types, but also utilizes facilities differently. Bicycle and Pedestrian Friendly Communities Targeting pedestrian and bicycle improvements to accommodate older adults, the disabled, and children often results in higher pedestrian and bicycle counts due to improved LOS. Additionally, properly designed pedestrian facilities can also improve mobility and access for individuals with disabilities. Many communities are upgrading existing sidewalk and path facilities to meet the latest Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) standards and enhance urban design elements. Improving pedestrian crossings, providing seating, and improving lighting, signage and pavement markings are all beneficial improvements for communities and improving pedestrian and bicycle LOS for all users. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 115 Streets designed to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists often result in safer conditions for all roadway users. Additionally, these streets often include other measures that are targeted to reduce vehicle travel speeds and provide access control. All of these measures can significantly reduce the number of conflicts that occur along a roadway, particularly at driveways and intersections. Bicycle and Pedestrian Involved Crashes Bicycle and pedestrian crash data is important to analyze, strategize, and determine if adjustments are necessary to improve active transportation. ADOT crash data (2019-2023) was queried to determine locations of bicycle and pedestrian involved crashes. In these five years (2019-2023), 23 pedestrian- involved crashes were reported on roadways owned and maintained by the City of Buckeye, whereas, 13 bicycle-involved crashes were reported in this same period. All pedestrian- and bicycle-involved crashes between 2019 and 2023 are illustrated below in Figure 5-8. Out of the 36 combined bicycle and pedestrian involved crashes within the City’s MPA, seven were fatal and four resulted in a serious injury. The remaining crashes resulted in either a possible injury or suspected minor injury. This data is key in identifying where a pedestrian or bicycle facility may be needed or needs enhancement. Owned and operated by ADOT, solutions for crashes occurring along I-10 should be addressed by ADOT, in consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). FHWA recommends a comprehensive approach to identifying solutions for high crash locations. These solutions should include the six E’s associated with active transportation identified by the League of American Bicyclists: 1. Education – Giving people of all ages and abilities the skills and confidence to ride 2. Encouragement – Creating a strong bicycle culture that welcomes and celebrates bicycling 3. Enforcement – Ensuring safe roads for all users 4. Evaluation and Planning – Planning for bicycling as a safe and variable transportation option 5. Equity – Support safe, active, and healthy opportunities for all trail and path users 6. Engineering – Creating safe and convenient places to ride and park These six areas reflect the multidisciplinary nature of transportation safety. Incorporating elements of the 6 E’s into the planning process can continue to contribute to reduced all crashes, especially those resulting in injuries and fatalities. Four crash locations are within Buckeye city limits but are on MCDOT owned and maintained roadways. In these instances, solutions would be addressed by MCDOT. In total, 36 crash locations are on roadways owned and maintained by the City of Buckeye. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 116 Figure 5-8. Bicycle and Pedestrian Involved Crash Locations BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 117 5.6 Active Transportation Recommendations The growing active transportation network should provide a user-friendly and active transportation network. Although a detailed set of multimodal recommendations is provided in the 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, the following are general recommendations that will guide the City in prioritizing funding for recommended projects. On-Street Facilities On-street bicycle facilities typically include bike route, bike lanes, paved shoulders, cycle tracks, and bike boulevards, among other potential facility types. On-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities should be implemented on collector and some arterial roadways. Collector Roadways Collector roads provide low-stress routes for bicycle and pedestrian networks. Existing and future collectors should be assessed for preferred routes and best practice guidance should be developed to create a safe and low-stress on-street bicycle and pedestrian transportation network. Collector roadways are the preferred facility for the bicycle and pedestrian network. Arterial Roadways Although arterial roadways often create high-stress environments for pedestrians and bicyclists, in some instances they may be recommended as the best route for network connectivity and to fill essential gaps in the active transportation network. Furthermore, arterial roadways are often the location of key destinations in a community including commercial developments and transit stops. The arterial network should continue to be assessed to identify arterials that will be essential to creating a complete bicycle and pedestrian network. Separated bike lanes should be considered on arterial roadways. While the MUTCD does not explicitly recommend the use of separated bike lanes, it acknowledges the safety benefits in reducing vehicle encroachment and enhancing cyclist protection and comfortability when designed with appropriate physical barriers or buffer areas. Street Cross-Sections The City’s existing street design standards for collector and arterial roadways to include sidewalks and striped bicycle lanes. The 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan provides best practice guidance for long-term implementation including identifying where on-street facilities are needed in the arterial and collector network, identifying the type of facility recommended, and identifying a variety of cross- sections to be implemented throughout the changing landscape of Buckeye. Off-Street Facilities Off-street facilities (trails and multi-use paths) provide low-stress and recreational routes for a bicycle and pedestrian network. Multi-use paths are off-street facilities reserved for the use of pedestrians and bicyclists exclusively and typically consist of a paved surface treatment. Multi-use paths can serve local trips and are preferred by non-experienced cyclists, pedestrians, and equestrians. Conversely, a trail is also a recreational facility but has an unpaved surface treatment (i.e. crushed gravel or dirt). Trails are typically designed for recreational riders and do not serve local trip options. Trail users can include pedestrians, non-experience cyclists, experienced cyclists (i.e. mountain bike riders), and equestrians. In the 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, locations of planned off-street facilities are identified to determine which off-street facilities are currently planned. In areas where off-street facilities are not BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 118 planned, wildlife linkages, powerline corridors, irrigation corridors, washes, channels, and more should be used to identify additional future off-street facilities. The 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan provides best practice guidance for off-street facilities, including typical cross-sections and safe roadway crossing designs. These recommendations will be updated in a future update to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Supporting Facilities Planning for multimodal improvements involves identifying both route improvements as well as improvements at key points in the transportation network. The 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan outlines the following: • Targeted improvements in areas where the City should pursue additional funds to execute design improvements. • Best practices in roadway crossings as well as transit accessibility improvements to support a truly multimodal network and address safety concerns at locations with pedestrian- and bicycle- involved crashes that resulted in serious injuries or fatalities. • A signage program to be implemented in phases or over time as areas of Buckeye are developed. 5.7 Implementation and Funding Implementation It is recommended that the City of Buckeye Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan be regularly updated as new data, policies, and multimodal funding becomes available. In addition to bicycle and pedestrian projects, the 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan identifies and outlines policies, programs, and performance measures for implementation of active transportation. Furthermore, local and regional partners should continue to be engaged to determine potential strategies for cooperative implementation. Each of these items are further described below. Partner Engagement Partner engagement should include elected/appointed officials, City staff, elementary schools, homeowner’s associations, cycling clubs, developers, MAG, MCDOT, neighboring municipalities, UPRR, Maricopa County, AZGFD, conservatory groups, US Corps of Engineers, APS, WAPA, Roosevelt Irrigation District, Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District, and the general public. Providing partner engagement not only better informs the planning process, but also establishes project champions that will advocate for the ongoing implementation of multimodal infrastructure in the City of Buckeye. Opportunities for cooperative planning include the following: • White Tanks Mountain Regional Park, • Buckeye-Surprise Common Borders, • Hassayampa River, • Maricopa Trail, • Central Arizona Project Canal, • and more. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 119 Projects An implementation matrix is provided in the 2019 BPMP, which outlines project priorities, cost estimates, phasing, funding sources, partners, and jurisdictional roles and maintenance of the recommended improvements. Policies Active Transportation policies provide an additional means for incremental implementation of a multimodal transportation network. Effective active transportation policies will dictate the intention for both publicly, and privately-paid infrastructure, and document the established exceptions to the policies. All existing and future policies, department procedures, design standards, and guidelines should promote safety. Programs Often referred to as the “6 E’s” of transportation safety practices, promoting safe active transportation through Education, Encouragement, Evaluation, Enforcement, Equity, and Engineering is a proven technique to promote safe interactions between pedestrians, bicyclists, equestrians, and vehicles. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan identifies best practices, guidance, and strategies that should continue to be undertaken by the City of Buckeye. Examples of these programs include the following: • Safe Routes to School, • Bicycle Friendly Communities, • Walk Friendly Communities, • Bike Education Classes, • Bike Events such as Bike to Work Week, and • Bicycle Friendly Business Program. Performance Measures Performance measures are an effective way to evaluate progress and effectiveness in implementing the active transportation network. Performance measures can be divided into one of two types: inventory measures or outcome measures. Inventory measures are easy to calculate. Examples of inventory measures might include miles of trails, sidewalks, or bike lanes constructed or the number of pedestrian lighting units installed. Outcome measures are more difficult to quantify as they require a deliberate intention to measure before and after construction. Examples of outcome measures might include change in pedestrian- and bicycle-involved crashes, change in pedestrian and bicycle counts conducted, change in sales tax generated, or change in property values. Performance measures should be included as part of the next update to the BPMP. Funding Funding for active transportation can come from a variety of sources including City funds, private funds (philanthropic or developer-paid), and federal and state funds passed through ADOT and MAG. Traditional government funding opportunities are summarized below. Federal Funds Several federal funding sources can be used to fund active transportation infrastructure. For the City of Buckeye, these funds would be applied for through the MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). These federal funding sources include the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program and BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 120 the Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program which includes the Transportation Alternative (TA) Set-Aside and the Recreation Trails Program (RTP). Each of these programs are described below. CMAQ provides a flexible funding source to State and local governments for transportation projects and programs to help meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Funding is available to reduce congestion and improve air quality for areas that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter (nonattainment areas) and for former nonattainment areas that are now in compliance (maintenance areas). As of October 2023, Maricopa County is in nonattainment for ozone and particulate matter. Funds in this program can be used for an active transportation project or program that has the potential to contribute to the attainment or maintenance of a NAAQS. The project or program should be effective in reducing air pollution and should be included in the MAG’s current transportation plan and TIP. STBG funds include two set-aside programs: Transportation Alternatives (TA) and Recreational Trails Program (RTP). The TA set-aside funds are authorized for transportation alternatives, including: • On- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities • Infrastructure projects for improving non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility • Community improvement activities such as historic preservation and vegetation management, and environmental mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity, recreational trail projects, and safe routes to school projects • Projects for planning, designing, or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former divided highways The RTP is a funding source within the TA set-aside. The RTP provides funds to develop and maintain recreational motorized and nonmotorized trails and trail-related facilities, including facilities for hiking, bicycling, equestrian use, off-road motorcycling, all-terrain vehicle riding, four-wheel driving, and other off-road motor vehicles. Safe Streets for All (SS4A) is another federal funding source that can be applied for to mitigate active transportation crashes and improve safety in the City. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) established the Safe Streets and Roads for All competitive grant program with $5 billion in appropriated funds over 5 years, 2022-2026. The SS4A program funds regional, local, and Tribal initiatives through grants to prevent roadway fatalities and serious injuries. The SS4A program supports the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Roadway Safety Strategy and goal of zero roadway deaths using a Safe System Approach. Regional Funds In addition to CMAQ and STBG funds, the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) has three funding programs that can be utilized for active transportation projects. These funding sources include the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Assistance Program, and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans and First Time Updates Program. Each of these programs are summarized below. The SRTS Program provides resources for schools and municipalities to administer Safe Routes to School (SRTS) initiatives and activities such as: BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 121 • Crossing Guard training workshops; • Programming of Transportation Alternative SRTS federal aid funding; and • Administration of SRTS Studies Projects. The MAG region receives an annual allocation of federal aid for transportation alternatives from ADOT. MAG member agencies are eligible to submit applications on behalf of a requested school district to utilize these funds for projects that will help schools and communities promote the health and safety of students. MAG allocations fund qualifying SRTS non-infrastructure projects. The MAG Design Assistance Program was first established in 1996, and is designed to support implementation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that will “improve, expand, and contribute” to an interconnected regional transportation network that will increase the number of people who can safely walk, bike, and access transit across the region. Each year, MAG issues a call for projects to member agencies through the MAG Active Transportation Design Assistance Program, where agencies can seek funding to evaluate project feasibility and advance projects to preliminary engineering/conceptual design (15% plans). The highest scoring projects receive funding to complete a scoping study, project assessment, or preliminary engineering for bicycle or pedestrian infrastructure projects. Eligible projects include regional shared-use paths or canal paths, bicycle and pedestrian access to transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. 5.8 Summary When people choose to walk, bike, hike, or participate in equestrian activities, they increase the likeliness of chance meetings with other members of the community, which build neighborhood and community relationships. Additionally, improving active transportation conditions significantly improves economic conditions in communities. Numerous studies have demonstrated measurable improvements in consumer cost savings, increased property values, and improved access to jobs, in addition to greater accessibility for low- and moderate-income families. Other studies have found the related costs for road maintenance, public parking, traffic congestion, and crashes can be reduced by shifting vehicular trips to non-motorized trips. Please refer to the 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan for more detailed information on active transportation within the City of Buckeye. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 122 6. Aviation Information in this chapter is was recently completed as part of the City’s Aviation Area Plan and the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan and, thus, not revised as part of this 2025 TMP update. Aviation services provide regional, national, and international access, enhancing convenient and proximate resident and visitor travel to and from Buckeye, as well as economic development through commercial and employment uses. This Chapter establishes a recommended plan of action for the maintenance and enhancement of aviation services within the City of Buckeye. The primary facility providing aviation services in Buckeye is the Buckeye Municipal Airport, which is owned and operated by the City of Buckeye. The adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan establishes goals and policies for the expansion of the Buckeye Municipal Airport to serve Buckeye into the future. Additionally, the General Plan identifies an economic development opportunity to establish the Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center near the municipal airport. This activity center is envisioned as a regional employment and retail hub, anchored by the airport. The expansion of the municipal airport will provide a catalyst for the growth and development of the activity center and increasing economic development within the City. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 123 6.1 Existing Airports and Military Installations Convenient and proximate access to air services is an integral component of a diverse and vibrant economy. Buckeye is served locally by the Buckeye Municipal Airport, and regionally by Sky Harbor International Airport. Luke Air Force Base and the Phoenix Goodyear Airport exist to the east of the Buckeye Municipal Planning Area. Coordinated aviation planning is necessary to ensure growth of aviation services in Buckeye which augment and expand resident, visitor and business transportation to regional, national and international locations and markets. This section provides the descriptions and operational characteristics for the three largest airports in or just outside of the Buckeye municipal planning area (Buckeye Municipal Airport, Luke Air Force Base, and Phoenix Goodyear Airport). Due to the proximity between these large airports and military installation, it is important to ensure that flight operations of facilities remain safe and compatible by maintaining coordinated airspace. Figure 6-1 shows the existing airports in the Buckeye MPA and in the immediate surrounding area. A summary of the primary aviation facilities within or near the City of Buckeye are provided in the following subsections. Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Sky Harbor) is owned and operated by the City of Phoenix and is the primary airport serving the Phoenix metropolitan area supporting travel for an average of 120,000 passengers a day and over 800 tons of commercial cargo. Sky Harbor serves more than 100 domestic and international destinations with 1,200 daily flights. Sky Harbor has a 30-nautical mile Class B restricted air space. The Buckeye Municipal Airport is outside of the Sky Harbor restricted airspace and air operations at the airport are not required to be coordinated with Sky Harbor. Additionally, as the Buckeye Municipal Airport is outside of the restricted air space for Sky Harbor, the planned expansion of the Buckeye Municipal Airport should not impact air operations at Sky Harbor. Buckeye Municipal Airport The City of Buckeye owns and operates the Buckeye Municipal Airport, located south of I-10 and west of SR 85. The municipal airport currently has a single runway which is designed for general aviation operations on approximately 700 acres. Figure 6-2 illustrates the existing Buckeye Municipal Airport. In terms of aviation operations, the majority of trips (70%) are itinerant trips from aircraft with a destination or origin away from the airport. The remaining 30 percent is comprised of local trips performed by aircraft that operates in sight of the airport. In 2015, the airport had an average of 145 aviation operations per day. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 124 Figure 6-1. Existing Airports BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 125 Figure 6-2. Existing Buckeye Municipal Airport BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 126 The airport is an economic focus area for the City, based on the opportunity for business sector expansion and increased travel options for residents and visitors to the City of Buckeye. Improvements to the airport have been completed over time, guided by the 2007 Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan. This Plan includes a recommendation for an additional runway to increase capacity at the airport, which will serve as a catalyst for future economic development providing jobs and services within the local economy. The recently completed Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan includes an Implementation Action to complete a new airport master plan to update the vision, recommended improvements, and operational plan for the municipal airport. It also identifies the land surrounding the airport as a future planned activity center or hub for future employment and retail uses. This activity center is further described in Section 6.2. Luke Air Force Base Luke Air Force Base (AFB) is a U.S. Air Force (USAF) base located within the city limits of Glendale, Arizona approximately four miles from the City of Buckeye planning boundary. Known as a primary training base of the Air Education and Training Command (AETC), Luke AFB is home to the 56th Fighter Wing. Considered the largest fighter wing in the world, Luke AFB has over 135 F-16’s assigned and trains approximately 300 fighter pilots and 350 maintenance technicians a year. In 2014, Luke AFB was assigned 144 F-35 Lighting II fighter jets from the Lockheed martin factory in Fort Worth, Texas. Currently there is approximately 20 F-35 jets at Luke AFB, with the remaining aircraft scheduled to be deployed to Luke AFB over the next decade. Joint Land Use Studies and Compatibility Studies were conducted for Luke Air Force Base in 2003 and provide the latest guidance on the future of this air facility. Luke AFB has two parallel runways, each of which has associated safety zones, called Clear Zones (CZs) and Accident Potential Zones (APZ). The safety zones impact the types and density of development in those zones. Such limitations on development can influence the types of roadways and modes of transportation in these areas. CZs exist primarily on-base, but some areas do extend off-base into unincorporated Maricopa County lands. Luke AFB APZs extend northeast into unincorporated Maricopa County and El Mirage, and southwest into Buckeye, the county, and Goodyear. In terms of noise impact, associated noise contours extend into nearby residential communities, with high noise zones occurring throughout areas of Buckeye, El Mirage, Goodyear, and unincorporated Maricopa County land. Flight operations and training range areas are crucial components of military installations and their approach to land use compatibility with surrounding communities. Although not located in the City of Buckeye, flight tracks associated with Luke AFB and Luke Auxiliary Field #1 have the potential to impact Buckeye through noise and safety concerns as well as any future operations at Buckeye Municipal Airport. As noted in the section on Buckeye Municipal Airport, future operations should consider potential impacts to the military mission at Luke AFB. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 127 Phoenix Goodyear Airport The Phoenix Goodyear Airport is located approximately 18 miles from the Buckeye Municipal Airport in Goodyear, although it is owned and operated by the City of Phoenix. When originally built, the facility served various naval air and military functions until it was converted to a public airport in 1968. The airport does not include commercial passenger service; however, it is a storage and maintenance location for commercial airlines that operate out of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. Additionally, the airport includes general aviation, corporate, and industrial aviation operations. The Phoenix Goodyear Airport Master Plan is currently underway. A Draft Master Plan was published in April 2018, which does not indicate any future runway extensions. Nonetheless, the plans for extending Buckeye Municipal Airport runway must be coordinated with Phoenix Goodyear Airport, which has a Class D airspace, to ensure that future operations do not alter the airspace in which the Buckeye Municipal Airport currently falls under (Class E), which could potentially impact flight operations. Class D airspace is generally airspace from the surface to 2,500 feet above elevation and Class E airspace is the controlled airspace that is not classified as any of the other airspaces (Class A, B, C, or D). Other Air Facilities According to the National Transportation Atlas Database, there are two additional registered air facilities within the Buckeye Municipal Planning Area (MPA): Pierce Airstrip (located near the intersection of Main Street and Rooks Road), and Coyner Airstrip (located near the intersection of Camelback Road and Jackrabbit Trail). Pierce and Coyner are both private airfields limited to agricultural operations. 6.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan is a recently completed comprehensive planning effort to update the General Plan for the City. This General Plan Update has been approved by the Mayor and City Council and was ratified by the citizens of Buckeye in the fall of 2018. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identified numerous recommendations applicable to the maintenance and enhancement of aviation services in the City of Buckeye into the future. These goals, policies and implementation actions are utilized in the development of aviation related recommendations in Section 6.6 of this Chapter. Applicable goals, policies and implementation actions from the recently adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan are identified within this section. Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan Update Long term sustainability and growth of the Buckeye Municipal Airport is important to the City of Buckeye for convenient air travel for residents and visitors to Buckeye and for future economic development opportunities associated with this community asset. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan established a primary implementation action to update the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan to provide for an updated vision and planned improvements to the airport. The implementation action is as follows: Action 46: Update the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan in close coordination with Luke AFB. The update to the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan is identified within the midterm timeframe of five to ten years. This planned update to the 2007 Master Plan will define future improvements to the airport, including a funding strategy to complete the planned improvements over time. The Master Plan update will also address operational aspects of the airport and future compatible uses within the airport BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 128 boundary. As the update to the Buckeye Municipal Airport will occur in the future, the timing, sequence and specific future improvements to the airport are not available for inclusion into this Transportation Master Plan (TMP). The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Pan also provides a number of goals and policies that establish the intended improvements to enhance aviation services at the Buckeye Municipal Airport as follows: • Goal S-13 The Buckeye Municipal Airport is a key growth center and protected from encroachment. Policy S-13.1 The City of Buckeye should continue to support the expansion of operations at the Buckeye Municipal Airport in close coordination with Luke AFB. Policy S-13.2 Proposed land uses and development proposals will be consistent with the 2007 Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan. Policy S-13.3 Multi-modal connections should be provided to the Buckeye Municipal Airport. Policy S 13.4 The City of Buckeye will improve public awareness of the airport through public outreach and education campaigns. Policy S-13.5 The City of Buckeye should expand telecommunications at the airport to support state of the art technology, such as wireless internet access and fiber optics. Policy S-13-6 The City of Buckeye will support work to extend the runway at Buckeye Municipal Airport in close coordination with Luke AFB. These policies provide broad guidance for the Airport Master Plan update, including improvements to sustain and enhance air services from the Buckeye Municipal Airport into the future. Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identified the area surrounding the Buckeye Municipal Airport as the Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center. This activity center is expected to serve as a regional employment and retail hub, anchored by the Buckeye Municipal Airport. Planned future uses are intended to complement and support the business functions of the airport, without limiting the long- term growth potential for the airport. To guide development of the Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center, the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan includes an implementation action to complete a specific area plan for the activity center to define land uses, development standards and limitations to ensure no negative impact to operations at the airport. The implementation action is: • Complete a Specific Area Plan for the Airport Employment Activity Center, as described in the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan. The Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center specific area plan is identified within the short timeframe of one to five years. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 129 6.3 Multimodal Integration The location of the Buckeye Municipal Airport provides significant opportunities for the integration of other modes of transportation including the street network, freight corridors and transit operations. Multimodal connectivity between the airport and other modes of transportation is addressed in the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan with a relevant goal and policy as follows: • Goal S-9 Buckeye is a connected community with an efficient multi-modal transportation network. Policy S-9.1 The City of Buckeye will require new development to provide connectivity to existing transportation networks to provide accessibility and efficient connections to adjacent parcels, neighborhoods, Activity Centers, and the region. The Buckeye Municipal Airport is adjacent to a national interstate system, state highway system and a national rail corridor which transport significant passenger traffic and freight through the Phoenix metropolitan area. This passenger traffic and freight provides a significant opportunity for synergy with airport operations and planned expansion of the airport and surrounding area into an employment and retail hub providing jobs and services within the City of Buckeye. The Buckeye Municipal Airport is located immediately south of I-10, which provides for regional, national, and international access. The airport is located west of SR 85, an important state highway connecting I-10 with Interstate 8 (I-8) which connects southern Arizona and southern California to the west and New Mexico and Texas to the east. This location provides a significant opportunity to integrate the airport with state and interstate travel and commerce. A connected truck route or freight stop will capitalize on the regional, national and international freight passing through the City of Buckeye every day and support potential future employment and commercial uses with related freight transportation needs. Truck routes to the airport present opportunities for cargo transport as the airport grows, supporting potential future commercial freight uses that utilize cargo transport. A connected truck route or freight stop supports the distribution of goods and the potential development of distribution centers providing jobs and commerce for the City of Buckeye. The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) line exists in relative proximity to the airport. The location of rail facilities near the airport represent an opportunity for integration with the airport and other modes of transportation in this area. Potential improvements to rail facilities are further identified in Chapter 7, Rail. At the local level, the Buckeye Municipal Airport is connected to the community through the street network; however, connectivity could be improved by increasing roadway linkages and connecting transit services to the airport for travelers or airport employees. Realignment of Tonopah Salome Highway and Broadway Road will accommodate the planned expansion of the airport and provide additional opportunities for expanded transit routes. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 130 6.4 Previous Aviation Plans Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan The Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan (Airport Master Plan), adopted in 2007, was created to evaluate the airport’s capabilities and to plan for future aviation demand and corresponding airport facilities. In the Airport Master Plan, a series of airside improvements (facilities related to aircraft operations) and landside improvements (facilities that support aircraft services and operations), were proposed, all of which contribute to expanded services at the airport. The following is a summary of the proposed improvements: Airside Improvements • Increase airfield capacity • Upgrade Runway 17-35 to Airport Reference Code C-II design standards • Extend Runway 17-35 to 8,700 feet • Provide a precision instrument approach procedure for Runway 17-35 • Install an automated weather observation system (completed) • Create a holding apron / bypass at each runway end to reduce departure delays (completed) Landside Improvements • Create a public terminal building • Provide areas for the development of facilities associated with aviation businesses that would utilize the airfield (completed) • Develop small general aviation aircraft storage hangars • Develop large conventional hangars • Consider the installation of a helipad • Maintain a drop zone for existing skydiving activities (completed) • Relocate fuel tanks for terminal expansion • Establish a permanent maintenance facility (under design) • Develop an aircraft wash / maintenance facility • Establish an airport traffic control tower In total, 13 of the 75 recommended improvements in the Airport Master Plan have been completed. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan establishes an implementation action to update the Airport Master Plan to provide guidance on the future growth and development of the airport. The update to the Airport Master Plan will include a reassessment and reprioritization of the recommendations listed in the 2007 Buckeye Airport Master Plan and will also include new recommendations based on existing and future conditions. Until the Airport Master Plan is updated, the existing Airport Master Plan and its associated recommendations will be used by the City of Buckeye for development guidance. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 131 Buckeye Municipal Airport Noise Compatibility Study The Buckeye Municipal Airport Noise Compatibility Study (Study) was prepared in 2008 and 2009 for Buckeye Municipal Airport to plan for noise related to airport operations. The Study was conducted in two parts, which are required under federal law (Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study). The first part, consisting of the Noise Compatibility Study Noise Exposure Maps was released in 2008 and documents the anticipated noise impact five years into the future. The second part, the Noise Compatibility Program, was released in 2009 and provides a noise compatibility plan for noise abatement, land use management, and program management. As part of the Study, noise contours were mapped to show how land uses would be impacted by noise from the airport with the additional proposed runway, as described in the 2007 Airport Master Plan. According to this Study, while no noise-sensitive institutions (i.e. schools, libraries, and places of worship) would be impacted by aircraft noise, there are existing residential land uses as well as potential for additional residential growth around the airport that are impacted by aircraft noise. These Noise Compatibility Study recommendations were considered in the development of this TMP and should be further referenced in future land use planning for the Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center, defined in the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan, and other properties that could be impacted by the air operations at Buckeye Municipal Airport. 6.5 Aviation Plan Recommendations This section includes summarized recommendations of the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan as well as the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan. The Buckeye Municipal Airport presents an opportunity for expanded economic development as there is a focus in the Airport Master Plan on extending the current runway. Doing so will add to the capability of the airport to perform operations and expand the types of aircraft that are able to fly into Buckeye Municipal Airport. This economic development opportunity is further expanded in this section including the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan recommendations for an Employment Activity Center at Buckeye Municipal Airport. Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan Recommendations The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan includes an important recommendation for a future Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center. Activity Centers are mixed-use centers that offer an environment where residents will be able to actively live, work, and play within the same development area. As such, Activity Centers will include a range of medium- and high-density development (six dwelling units per acre) that promotes walking, bicycling, and transit as viable means of getting from one destination to another. The Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center is expected to serve as a regional employment and retail hub, anchored by the Buckeye Municipal Airport. Ensuring future land uses will complement and BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 132 support the business functions of the airport and not infringe upon the long-term potential of the airport is a significant goal in the planning for the future activity center. Therefore, the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan recommends three key actions: • Specific Area Plan: Prepare a specific area plan for the Buckeye Airport Employment Center. This specific area plan effort will need to be done in close coordination with Luke AFB and incorporate findings of the Buckeye Municipal Airport Noise Compatibility Study. • Extend Transit Service: Plan for the extension of transit service to the future Buckeye Airport Employment Center. This recommendation is addressed in Chapter 4, Transit of this TMP. • Airport Master Plan Update: Following the specific area plan, the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan will need to be updated to identify any additional improvements or changes to airport operations. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan indicates that the Airport Employment Activity Center is one of the top priorities for short-term implementation by the City. The specific area plan for the Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center is anticipated to be completed within the first five years following the 2018 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan adoption and voter ratification. Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan Recommendations The 2007 Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan (Airport Master Plan) provides recommendations for airport improvements through an airport capital improvement program (CIP). It is the recommendation of this TMP that the City continue to implement actions identified in the Airport Master Plan until a future update to the Airport Master Plan is completed, following completion of the specific area plan for the Buckeye Airport Employment Activity Center. Recommendations in the Airport Master Plan are divided into three planning horizons: Short-Term (First Five Years), Intermediate Term (6-10 years), and Long-Term (11-20 years). Table 6-1. summarizes the total costs for each planning horizon and provides a total cost for all recommendations and eligibility for federal and state funding sources. Table 6-1. Total Costs by Planning Horizon – Capital Improvement Program for Buckeye Municipal Airport BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 133 In total, the Airport Master Plan includes 75 separate projects, 49 of which were to be completed in the first ten years following completion of the Airport Master Plan (2007-2017). In total, 13 projects that have been completed to date, including: • Land acquisition environment assessment • Construct taxi lane • Construct airport entrance road • Design taxiway lighting • Design interior security fencing and gates • Design AWOS-III installation • Install taxiway lighting • Install interior security fencing and gates • Install AWOS-III • Design north and south apron expansion – Phase I • Extend apron north and south – Phase I • Prepare pavement maintenance management • program • Pavement maintenance. A future update of the Airport Master Plan may change the recommended improvements identified in the current Airport Master Plan. Figure 6-3 illustrates the expanded airport property proposed in the Airport Master Plan and the necessary realignment of Broadway Road and Yuma Road. Additionally, there will be a need to either realign the Roosevelt Irrigation District Canal or pipe or tile the canal to go under the future extended runway. In order to expand the airport, the City must acquire 74 acres to the north of the existing runway, which may be purchased utilizing federal funds. Figure 6-4 illustrates the development staging of all recommendations identified in the current Airport Master Plan organized by short-, intermediate-, and long-term improvements. The Airport Master Plan lists individual projects by planning horizon, including the total cost per project and the potential cost sharing between the City, federal government, and ADOT. A listing of individual projects by planning horizon are provided on the following pages. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 134 Figure 6-3. Aviation Plan Recommendations BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 135 Figure 6-4. Development Staging of Buckeye Municipal Airport Capital Improvement Program BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 136 Table 6-2 lists the 28 projects, project costs, and eligibility for funding sources within the Short-Term Planning Horizon (First Five Years). In total, 12 projects have been completed from the original Short- Term Planning Horizon project list. Table 6-2. Short-Term Planning Horizon (First Five Years) – Capital Improvement Program for Buckeye Municipal Airport Source: Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan, 2007 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 137 Table 6-3 lists the 21 projects, project costs, and eligibility for funding sources within the Intermediate- Term Planning Horizon (6-10 years). In total, one project was completed from the original Intermediate- Term Planning Horizon project list. Table 6-3. Intermediate-Term Planning Horizon (6-10 Years) - Capital Improvement Program for Buckeye Municipal Airport Source: Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan, 2007 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 138 Table 6-4 lists the 16 projects, project costs, and eligibility for funding sources within the Long-Term Planning Horizon (11-20 years). No projects have been completed from the original Long-Term Planning Horizon project list. Table 6-4. Long-Term Planning Horizon (11-20 Years) - Capital Improvement Program for Buckeye Municipal Airport BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 139 The recommendations provided in the Airport Master Plan provide a listing of projects to be constructed within the identified timeframes. By 2018, 49 of the 75 identified projects were to be completed; however, to date just 13 projects have been completed. In the future update to the Airport Master Plan this project list will be revisited and likely revised to address evolving needs of the airport operations. These evolving needs will address changes in technology, changes in services and customer types, and the changes associated with becoming an employment activity center. Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study Recommendations The Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study was created in 2008 by an engineering firm to create recommendations to the City of Buckeye for increasing drainage and utility capacity and services that would support growth of the airport. Recommendations were made for the following: • Water system – Water system recommendations include the design and construction for proposed domestic water system and fire protection system infrastructure. This is estimated to cost $6.5 million. • Sewer system – It is recommended that a complete sanitary wastewater sewer system infrastructure be designed and constructed in three independent sewer improvement sections. The cost estimated for these recommendations is $2.8 million. • Electrical – Recommendations for electrical include the utilization of primary power on Palo Verde Road as underground service. It is also recommended that the existing overhead secondary power on the airport be converted to buried duct banks and converting 1,000 feet of existing power poles along Yuma Road to buried service. • Communications – Communications recommendations include shared trench electrical and telephone services on property and cable service followed by conduit for voice and data transmission infrastructure. The cost associated with these recommendations is $1.9 million. • Natural Gas System – While Southwest Gas has indicated that it is unlikely that natural gas facilities will be available on Palo Verde Road, the City of Buckeye has identified possible infrastructure that could service facilities at the airport. If such infrastructure was constructed, the cost is estimated at $700,000. • Utility Corridors – Utility corridors are recommended to be identified for future water, sewer, electric, ITS, telecommunications, and gas utilities. Drainage is not to be placed in such corridors. There is no specified cost detailed for these improvements. • Drainage –Drainage improvement recommendations include six tributary drainage sub-areas with drainage features that are grouped into four systems: off-site drainage system, on-site infield retention system, on-site storm drain system, and on-site graded system with swales. The estimated cost for these improvements is $4.2 million. These recommendations should be further evaluated and considered in the update to the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan. Additionally, a sustainable funding source should be identified for these needed investments at Buckeye Municipal Airport and the long-term maintenance of such infrastructure. 6.6 Aviation Implementation and Funding This section provides an overview of the implementation strategies for the Buckeye Municipal Airport and the available sources of funding to implement the Aviation Plan recommendations. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 140 Funding Currently the City of Buckeye receives entitlement funding of $150,000 annually for the Airport Capital Improvement Program via the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and/or ADOT. The City has saved past entitlement funds for the design of taxiway and apron improvements. The FAA and/or ADOT funds capital projects for the airport, focusing on projects related to the runway, taxiway, and other flight safety specific projects. Operations at the airport, such as maintaining infrastructure operations and upgrading facilities, are being supported by airport revenues. Specific improvements needed are identified by the City of Buckeye, consistent with the approved Airport Master Plan. The City of Buckeye prioritizes the needs, submit grant requests, and provide the required local matching funds. All FAA grant monies awarded go directly from the FAA to the City of Buckeye; they do not pass through MAG or ADOT. As seen in Table 6-5 and shown on Figure 6-5 much of the airport revenue goes towards operations, making it important to continue investment into the airport to increase airport related businesses and additional airport operations, thus expanding upon runway expansion requirements, which can increase FAA funding. It is the recommendation of this TMP that the City investigate a sustainable local funding source to provide the necessary match for airport capital investments and any investments deemed non- eligible for entitlement funding. Table 6-5. Buckeye Municipal Airport Revenue and Expenses from 2010-2018 Source: City of Buckeye, 2018 Figure 6-5. Buckeye Municipal Airport Total Revenue v. Expenses Source: City of Buckeye, 2018 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 141 The Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan provides short-term (first five years), intermediate-term (6- 10 years), and long-term (11-20 years) planning horizons for the implementation of improvements. The cost for improvements may be funded by the City; however, state and federal funding sources are available with the potential to cover some of the cost. The Airport and Airway Trust Fund (Trust Fund) is a federal fund, provided by taxes on airline ticket sales, aviation fuel, air cargo, and the flight segment tax. Funds from the Trust are distributed annually by the FAA from appropriations by Congress and may cover both capital and operating costs. Airport improvements can also be implemented through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP), which is a funding mechanism for public agencies to receive funding for public-use airports. Eligible airports must be a part of the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), which identifies existing and proposed airports that are eligible for AIP grants due to their significance to national air transportation. As of 2017, Buckeye Municipal Airport is listed as an NPIAS airport. At the state level, funds for airports are sourced through the State Aviation Fund. Distribution of these funds is allocated through the Airport Capital Improvement Program, developed by ADOT, which maximizes the use of both state and FAA funds. State Aviation Funds are derived from flight property tax, aircraft lieu taxes, and aviation fuel taxes and distributed between design / construction projects, planning projects, and land acquisition. The State Transportation Board approves the distribution of these funds annually. Through the State Aviation Fund, the State can match federal grants and provide state-funded grants for qualifying airport projects. ADOT also has an Airport Loan Program, which provides funding for airport improvements to eligible airports. Such loans are provided to improve the economic status of the airport. In addition to traditional funding sources, the City should investigate additional public-private partnership arrangements. Public-private partnerships refers to arrangements between the public and private sectors whereby some of the services that would typically be a public-sector responsibility are provided by the private-sector, with agreement on objectives for delivery of public infrastructure or public services. Several privatization models exist that may be examined further through the update to the Airport Master Plan, including: • Service contracts • Management contracts • Developer financing / operation • Full privatization (long-term lease or sale) Implementation This Aviation chapter identifies four improvement types: implement recommendations of the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan, prepare a specific area plan, extend transit service to Buckeye Municipal Airport, and update the existing Airport Master Plan. Table 6-6 provides a listing of the Short-term Aviation Recommendations. Table 6-7 provides a listing of the Mid-term Aviation Recommendations. Table 6-8 provides a listing of the Long-term Aviation Recommendations. The planning-level costs and other implementation actions associated with these improvements are included in Chapter 10, Recommendations and Implementation. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 142 Table 6-6. Short-term Aviation System Recommendations Source: Matrix Design Group, 2018; Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan, 2018; Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan, 2007. Table 6-7. Mid-term Aviation System Recommendations Source: Matrix Design Group, 2018; Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan, 2018; Buckeye Drainage and Utility Study, 2008. Table 6-8.Long-term Aviation System Recommendations Source: Matrix Design Group, 2018; Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan, 2007. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 143 6.7 Summary The City of Buckeye acknowledges the importance of the Buckeye Municipal Airport and the integral role the airport plays in the transportation network. The airport is considered one of the top economic development priorities for the City. In fact, the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identifies the airport as a future Airport Employment Activity Center that will include a mix of medium- and high-density developments that encourage people to live, work and play all within the same activity center. The future Buckeye Municipal Airport will be surrounded by mixed-use development that do not impede airport operations and meets compatible land use requirements. The mixed-use development will be supported by multimodal transportation options, allowing people to choose to either drive, walk, bike, or ride transit to reach their destination. To meet this vision, the Buckeye Municipal Airport runway must be upgraded and extended, which requires realignment of Yuma Road and Broadway Road. The City should revaluate if rerouting the Roosevelt Irrigation District Canal or piping/tiling the canal under the future extended runway would be the best option. However, the City must recognize and fund the much-needed utility infrastructure improvements needed, otherwise, the airport will be stagnant in its growth potential, as has been evidenced in the past several decades. Additionally, the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan identifies airside and landside improvements that will raise the caliber of operation and attract additional customers with these additional amenities. Lastly, the goal and vision for the airport and the surrounding development areas have changed since the completed of the Airport Master Plan in 2007. As such, an Airport Master Plan update should be conducted to address any changes in technology, changes in airport operations, and changes in the long- range goal of creating a future employment activity center surrounding the airport. Recommendations of this Aviation Plan are incorporated in Chapter 10 (Recommendations and Implementation) of this TMP along with the recommendations of other TMP Plan Elements (streets, transit, active transportation, rail, freight, and ITS). BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 144 7. Rail Information in this chapter will be the direct focus of a future study and, thus, not revised as part of this 2025 TMP update. The adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan establishes economic development goals, which include diversifying the economy by expanding upon various industries such as manufacturing, agriculture technology, and retail that heavily rely on the movement of goods and materials by rail. Rail supports expansion and diversification of the local economy by providing connections to regional, national, and international markets. Additionally, opportunities associated with diversifying use of the existing rail corridor include the potential additional of commuter rail service to meet the demands of a growing commuter population. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 145 7.1 Existing Rail Facilities Understanding the existing rail and freight facilities within the Buckeye planning area is a necessary step before planning for future rail services. This section includes an overview of the rail facilities that currently exist in Buckeye, which are shown in Figure 7-1. The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) is an interstate railroad that traverses through the Buckeye Municipal Planning Area (MPA). The UPRR rail line extends into 23 states in the West and Midwest. In Buckeye, the rail line runs in an east-west direction generally along the Baseline Road alignment. This rail line ultimately provides connection to California and New Mexico. The UPRR rail line includes the Wellton Branch Line, which is currently in service within the Buckeye MPA. Although the Wellton Branch rail line is in service within the Buckeye MPA, an 80-mile segment of the Wellton Branch rail line, west of the Buckeye MPA, is currently out of service. This out of service segment requires trains to detour 130 miles to reach California. Various reports have studied the possibility of re-establishing this branch line, which is detailed further in the Relevant Rail Plans section. Several rail facilities are located along the UPRR including the Buckeye Yard, and 14 existing at-grade rail crossings. The following is a description of these rail facilities: Buckeye Yard includes a former depot site, which has been identified in several studies as a potential commuter rail station. The Buckeye Yard is located east of the intersection of Baseline Road and Miller Road. The yard is located on the north side of the tracks; however, the customers the yard serves are located on the south side of the tracks. At-grade Rail Crossings exist at 16 locations in the Buckeye MPA including: o 4th Street o Perryville Road At-grade crossing, Wellton Branch rail line at Palo Verde Road o Apache Road o Rainbow Road o Baseline Road o Rooks Road o Dean Road o SR 85 North o Jackrabbit Trail o SR 85 South o Johnson Road o Turner Road o Miller Road o Verrado Way o Palo Verde Road o Wilson Avenue The existing rail lines and facilities were considered during the development of the recommendations for this Chapter. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 146 Figure 7-1. Existing Rail Facilities BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 147 7.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identified recommendations relevant to the support of rail in Buckeye. The goals and policies are used for the development of the rail recommendations in this Chapter. These policies focus on promoting employment and industrial uses in appropriate areas, maintaining compatibility between rail operations and neighboring land uses, and expanded regional rail connectivity. Promoting Employment, Industrial, and Compatible Land Uses Land uses that are most compatible with rail are those that are dependent upon, or benefit from, having access to the distribution of goods. Such examples of these land uses are employment and agricultural uses. While there are land uses that would benefit from rail, there are some that would not due to noise sensitivity, vibration, traffic, and other impacts that rail may have. Land uses that are incompatible with rail in Buckeye are residential uses, dense commercial areas, and open spaces that promote active recreation. These land uses are generally more sensitive to the impacts of rail or would not necessarily benefit from having rail nearby and should be considered when planning for rail. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan defines the Employment land use, which may include industrial uses, such as manufacturing and warehouse facilities, both of which would benefit from having rail as a distribution option proximate to their location. Additionally, agricultural uses are dependent upon the distribution of goods that are grown or produced, making such uses compatible with rail terminals. Linking rail with these land uses will support the economic growth of industries within Buckeye. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identified the following rail-related goals and policies that support compatible land uses. • Goal G-7 Buckeye has a strong employment base providing a range of jobs opportunities with competitive salaries. o Policy G-7.2 The City of Buckeye will encourage the use of the land adjacent to existing rail corridors for light and general industrial employment uses. o Policy G-7.3. The City of Buckeye should protect existing industrial development from encroachment by incompatible development. • Goal G-9 Buckeye has an expansive and diverse economy. o Policy G-9.3 The City of Buckeye should protect its primary industrial and commercial corridors (areas with access to highways and railroads) from conversion to non- employment uses or encroachment by uses that would limit future uses on these sites. Expanded Regional Rail Connectivity Due to the expansiveness of the UPRR, the rail line in Buckeye provides regional, and even national, connectivity. Supporting the existing rail lines and encouraging new uses, such as commuter rail, on the lines, will expand the City’s ability to transport goods and serve commuters throughout the region. The following goals and policies support rail expansions: • Goal S-9 Buckeye is a connected community with an efficient multimodal transportation network. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 148 o Policy S-9.8 The City of Buckeye will actively promote and lobby for the expansion and development of new key transportation facilities, including commuter rail and other regional transportation opportunities. • Goal S-12 Buckeye’s multimodal system provides alternatives for modes of travel. o Policy S-12.3 The City of Buckeye should explore options for adding high capacity transit, such as commuter rail. o Policy S-12.9 The City of Buckeye will support work to reopen the UPRR Wellton Branch. These goals and policies underscore support for a rail system that influences industry growth and regional transportation opportunities. Provided in this Rail Chapter are transportation recommendations that support these policies, including both freight and commuter rail. 7.3 Multimodal Integration The future multimodal transportation network in Buckeye will support connectivity and economic development throughout the City. Rail is one component of the overall network but is an important link in the chain in Buckeye’s transportation network. More than any other mode of transportation, rail can provide the mass movement of goods and expands the markets the City is able to reach. Rail terminals in Buckeye should be connected by truck routes to move goods throughout the City. Additionally, while the UPRR rail does not directly run to the Buckeye Municipal Airport, truck routes could connect the rail line to the airport, creating additional opportunities for cargo transport. In Buckeye, the UPRR rail line intersects with SR 85 and will intersect with the future I-11 corridor. The intersections of these two types of modes of transportation creates an opportunity for the development of industry hubs for the City and the region. Additionally, the intersection with the future I-11 corridor may require the need for crossings that would not disrupt the flow of traffic on the roadways. The potential future commuter rail stations would be well integrated with bus stops, allowing regional travelers to reach their destination in Buckeye via city-wide transit. Neighboring transit hubs and commuter rail stops would support an efficient integration of transportation networks. 7.4 Relevant Rail Plans The Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) has conducted several studies related to rail and freight mobility for the region. The railroad improvements proposed in the studies present opportunities for economic growth in Buckeye. Rail transportation can serve as a catalyst for economic development in the City by supporting the import of materials and the distribution of goods. Additionally, Buckeye, MAG, and MAG’s member jurisdictions have planned for the future use of the UPRR line for passenger (commuter) rail service. Therefore, the UPRR line would be used for the movement of both goods and people. Passenger rail services would enhance the connectivity of the region and expand the multimodal transportation network. Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study In 2014, MAG released the Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study (Study), to present alternatives for rehabilitation of the 80-mile out of service segment of the railroad line. The Study presented four different alternatives with various levels of rehabilitation or new infrastructure to provide for freight and passenger rail services with costs ranging from $165 million to $420 million. The Study concluded with BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 149 the recommendation that the cost of improvements was not justified with passenger rail use exclusively and that additional freight generating land uses are needed along the rail corridor. The Study recommends that agencies continue to identify and develop freight opportunities to increase freight demand for the corridor. As freight opportunities increase, the infrastructure investment becomes more warranted and will support the necessary improvements to the disconnected service line that exists today. Figure 7-2 shows the study area for the Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study. Figure 7-2. Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study – Study Area Source: MAG, Wellton Branch Rehabilitation Study, 2014. Hassayampa Valley Rail Corridors Cost Analysis Update In 2013 MAG produced the Hassayampa Valley Rail Corridors Analysis Update (Analysis Update), which analyzed the north-south rail corridors in the southwest Phoenix metropolitan area; however, the study has not garnered regional support for interagency cooperation and funding. Nevertheless, the study was evaluated for the purpose of this TMP and was ultimately not included in the Rail recommendations. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 150 Commuter Rail System Study MAG updated the 2010 MAG Commuter Rail System Study (Commuter Study) in the fall of 2018. The 2010 Commuter Study evaluated the need and feasibility of commuter rail including corridor alternatives in both the East and West Valley of the Phoenix metropolitan area. The update to this plan revises the results of the original study, further analyzing commuter rail corridors that were initially evaluated in 2010. One of the proposed corridors in the West Valley is the Estrella Line, previously the Yuma West in the 2010 plan, which extends west from Phoenix to Buckeye. This 45-mile corridor would be implemented on the existing UPRR line and would include a station/stop near Historic Downtown Buckeye. Other corridors recommended in the 2018 Commuter Study evaluated include: Grand Line (connecting downtown Phoenix to Surprise), the Kyrene Line (connecting downtown Phoenix, Tempe, and Chandler), the San Tan line (connecting downtown Phoenix, Tempe, Mesa, Gilbert, and Queen Creek), and the Chandler Corridor. According to the Commuter Study, the Estrella Line is proposed to connect from Buckeye to Phoenix. The extension into Buckeye is proposed as a near-term corridor extension. Figure 7-3 illustrates the estimated daily boardings in 2040 from the 2018 Study Update. In 2010 MAG completed the Yuma West Commuter Rail Corridor Development Plan which included analysis of existing and future conditions, a conceptual corridor development plan, estimated costs, and implementation strategies. This study recommended implementation of the segment connecting to Buckeye between year 2030 and 2040 with 30-minute headways in the peak AM and PM hours and 60- minute headways in the off-peak hours. Figure 7-3. MAG Commuter Rail System 2040 Daily Boardings by Station Source: MAG, Commuter Rail System Study Update, 2018. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 151 ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan ADOT completed the Arizona State Rail Plan in 2011 and updated the plan in late 2018. This plan is a comprehensive assessment of the passenger and freight needs in the state. Through this plan, the current rail system was assessed, infrastructure needs were determined with the intent of including rail projects into long-range planning processes in the State. The State Rail Plan notes that one of the rail facilities in the state is the Buckeye Yard where switching activities are conducted. According to the plan, UPRR owns additional property to create a rail and truck logistics center that would support rail deliveries, if warranted by sufficient levels of economic activity. In addition to identifying proposed logistic centers, the plan also illustrates proposed Corridors of Opportunity, each which has specific strategies associated with them. These corridors are the Arizona Spine, CANMEX Corridor, Route 66 Corridor, and Sunset Corridor. The Arizona Spine Corridor and the Sunset Corridor include segments of Buckeye and are shown on Figure 7-4 and Figure 7-5 respectively. Table 7-1 and Table 7-2 list the implementation actions for the Arizona Spine Corridor and Sunset Corridor as outlined in the State Rail Plan. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 152 Figure 7-4. ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan – Arizona Spine Corridor of Opportunity Source: ADOT State Rail Plan, 2011 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 153 Figure 7-5. ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan – Sunset Route Corridor of Opportunity Source: ADOT State Rail Plan, 2011 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 154 Table 7-1. State Rail Plan – Arizona Spine Corridor Implementation Actions Source: ADOT State Rail Plan, 2016. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 155 Table 7-2. State Rail Plan – Sunset Corridor Implementation Actions Source: ADOT State Rail Plan, 2016. ADOT Passenger Rail Study: Tucson to Phoenix ADOT began the Passenger Rail Study in 2011 and concluded a record of decision in 2016. The purpose of the plan was to determine if a passenger rail system between Tucson and Phoenix was feasible. Through the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement and the Record of Decision, the Yellow Corridor Alternative was selected to be further reviewed during Tier 2 studies, which is shown on Figure 7-6. The alternative shows a passenger rail line extending in Buckeye. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 156 Figure 7-6. ADOT Passenger Rail Study: Tucson to Phoenix – Preferred Alterative Source: ADOT, Passenger Rail Study: Tucson to Phoenix, 2016. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 157 7.5 Rail Recommendations Rail recommendations are divided into three project types: commuter rail, rail crossings, and rail rehabilitation. Each of these project types are described in this section and illustrated on Figure 7-7. Commuter Rail Commuter rail recommendations are derived from MAG Commuter Rail System Study described in the previous section, of which Buckeye has been an active participant. The commuter rail recommendations from the 2010 Study and the 2018 Study Update include using existing railroads for commuter rail services in addition to freight services, which would provide commuters with an alternative mode of local and regional transportation. It is recommended that the City, in cooperation with MAG and the future commuter rail authority, implement the commuter rail route to Miller Road with the potential extension on the Wellton Branch west of the Buckeye MPA. Table 7-3 includes the identified implementation actions from the draft 2018 Study Update. The City of Buckeye should continue to support and participate in implementation actions as an active MAG member agency. As indicated in Table 7-4 the commuter rail recommendations are divided into two primary action items. Rail Crossings This plan recommends preservation of the existing at-grade rail crossings throughout Buckeye. Potential expansion of at-grade crossings or construction of grade-separated crossings will be evaluated in the future. Key rail crossings that should be preserved as the City continues to grow, include: o 4th Street, south of Baseline Road o Perryville Road, between Southern Avenue and Broadway Road o Apache Road, north of Baseline Road o SR 85 and Baseline Road o Dean Road and Southern Avenue o Turner Road and Baseline Road o Jackrabbit Trail, between Southern Avenue and Broadway Road o Verrado Way, north of Southern Avenue o Johnson Road, north of Lower River Road o Watson Road, north of Baseline Road o Miller Road and Baseline Road o Palo Verde Road, between Baseline Road and Lower River Road The City may choose to study these crossing locations as potential candidate locations for grade- separated rail crossings in the future, when an increase in rail and/or vehicle traffic become a safety or mobility concern. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 158 Figure 7-7. Rail Plan Recommendations, 2018 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 159 Table 7-3. Commuter Rail Implementation Next Steps Source: 2018 Regional Commuter Rail System Study Update, Draft July 2018 Table 7-4. Rail Recommendations Source: City of Buckeye, Matrix Design Group, 2018 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 160 Wellton Branch Rehabilitation The 2014 Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study identified significant improvements necessary to reinstate intercity connection along the Wellton Branch rail line that would connect the Phoenix metropolitan area with California markets. The study indicates that additional freight generating land uses are needed along the rail corridor. The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan supports this goal including locating future employment land uses along the rail corridor. Given MAG has determined to not proceed with the Wellton Branch Rehabilitation, specific railroad rehabilitation recommendations have not been included in the TMP. However, the City of Buckeye supports a future study of the Wellton Branch to determine the appropriate timing of rehabilitation and reopening. 7.6 Rail Implementation and Funding The following are potential funding sources that the City of Buckeye could consider for improvements to the rail system in Buckeye. Funding Funding for rail-related improvements are typically derived from Federal funding sources. Additionally, the potential addition of commuter rail could potentially be funded by an extension of the MAG region’s Proposition 400 excise tax. Provided in this section is a description of the eligible funding sources. Federal As part of the Federal Highway Administration Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), the Railway-Highway Crossings Program, also known as Section 130, provides funding for improvements at railway-highway crossing to eliminate hazards. Improvements include either separation, relocation, or protective devices. Funds are eligible for projects at all public crossings, including roadways, bike routes and trail, and pedestrian paths. ADOT administers this program in Arizona and receives approximately $2.3 million annually for such projects. Federal Competitive Discretionary Grants Although these programs are highly competitive, discretionary funding programs, such as the BUILD and INFRA discretionary grant programs provide an additional funding source for rail projects. The BUILD (Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development) transportation discretionary grant program (formerly TIGER grants) are for regionally-significant roads, bridges, transit, rail, ports or intermodal transportation projects. The program has eight (8) overarching objectives that should be considered when determining if BUILD-eligible projects will compete well against national competition: • Safety • Economic competitiveness • Quality of life • Environmental protection • State of good repair • Innovation • Partnership • Non-Federal revenue for future transportation infrastructure investments The INFRA (Infrastructure for Rebuilding America) discretionary grants (formerly FASTLANE grants) are a competitive funding source that can be used to fund a variety of infrastructure project costs including: BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 161 reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of property, environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, equipment acquisition, and operational improvements directly related to system performance. The program has four overarching objectives that should be considered when determining if INFRA-eligible projects will compete well against national competition: • Supporting Economic Vitality • Leveraging Federal Funding • Performance and Accountability • Innovation • Environmental Review and Permitting • Special Experimental Authorities • Safety and Technology Proposed rail projects in this Chapter should be prioritized based on the metrics of the BUILD and INFRA programs. Although BUILD and INFRA are highly competitive federal funding programs, the criteria outlined in their Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) are a consistent way to measure the recommended rail projects against regional and state competition for limited funds. Additionally, whenever possible, the City of Buckeye should work to align these recommendations with goals established in the Arizona State Rail Plan to be competitive when pursuing Section 130 Highway-Railroad Grade Crossing Safety Program funds. Implementation This Rail chapter identifies implementation recommendations for adding commuter rail and freight facilities in Buckeye. Table 7-5, Table 7-6, and Table 7-7, provide a listing of the Short-term, Mid-term, and Long-term rail recommendations. The planning-level costs and other implementation actions associated with these recommendations are included in Chapter 10 (Recommendations and Implementation). BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 162 Table 7-5. Short-term Rail System Recommendations Source: City of Buckeye, Matrix Design Group, 2018; MAG Commuter Rail System Study, 2018 Table 7-6. Mid-term Rail System Recommendations Source: City of Buckeye, Matrix Design Group, 2018; MAG Commuter Rail System Study, 2018 Table 7-7.Long-term Rail System Recommendations Source: City of Buckeye, Matrix Design Group, 2018; ADOT State Rail Plan, 2011 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 163 7.7 Summary Rail is an important component in achieving economic development goals. Many previous rail plans or studies have been conducted for the area which have identified railroad rehabilitation efforts and commuter rail service. In support of those efforts, the City of Buckeye incorporates the draft commuter rail recommendations. Furthermore, this TMP identifies the existing at-grade rail crossings as key crossings to be preserved. Additionally, some of these at-grade rail crossings should be studied as potential grade-separated rail crossings if increased vehicle and rail traffic become a safety concern or affect the mobility of the transportation network. Notably, the Hassayampa Valley Rail Corridors Cost Analysis Update and the Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study recommendations have not been incorporated in this TMP. Although the City of Buckeye supports the goals envisioned in these studies, both studies have not garnered the necessary regional support for interagency cooperation and funding. The City of Buckeye supports a future study of the Wellton Branch to determine appropriate timing of rehabilitation improvements and reopening of the rail line. Recommendations of this Rail chapter are incorporated in Chapter 10 (Recommendations and Implementation) of this TMP along with the recommendations of other TMP Plan Elements (streets, transit, active transportation, aviation, freight, and ITS). BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 164 8. Freight The City’s economic development and overall diversification including manufacturing, agriculture technology, and retail industries (to name a few) are dependent on the movement of goods and freight. This occurs through trucks, rail, and air carriers. Given the different modes of transportation that freight may be distributed, the roadway network should be planned to provide connectivity for efficient commerce. This Chapter discusses strategic priorities to enhance the movement of freight and connect both intermodal facilities and local industry generators via preferred truck corridors. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 165 8.1 Existing Freight Facilities Understanding the existing freight facilities within the planning area is a necessary step in planning for future freight mobility. The following are the freight services that exist in Buckeye. Truck Freight Buckeye serves as a critical hub for connectivity between supply chain and customers by providing direct access to the Western U.S. and Mexico. Key transportation routes supporting this connectivity include I- 10, SR 85, MC 85, close connections to I-8 and SR 303, future SR 30 and access to the Union Pacific Railroad. Within the Buckeye MPA, state highways and interstates are designated as part of the National Highway Freight Network (NHFN), making these highways eligible for federal formula funds. These NHFN designated corridors include I-10, SR 85, and I-8. In addition to the aforementioned highways, the future I-11 Interstate corridor is envisioned as a major north-south transcontinental high-capacity corridor connecting multiple cities, trade hubs, ports, linking highways as well as railroads, and extending from Mexico through Buckeye and the Hoover Dam into Nevada and beyond to the Canadian border. The future I-11 has been commonly referred to as a NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) corridor or the Canamex Corridor. Therefore, I-11 will be an internationally significant route serving trade between Canada, the United States, and Mexico and providing additional and much needed freight capacity through the intermountain west region of the United States. Furthermore, I-11 will fill an important gap in the interstate highway network, connecting the Las Vegas and Phoenix metropolitan areas. The future I-11 corridor is intended as a multi-use corridor that will improve Buckeye’s and Arizona’s access to regional and international markets, while opening up new opportunities for enhanced travel, mobility, trade, commerce, job growth and economic competitiveness. As such, freight traffic in Buckeye is anticipated to increase significantly in the future. In May 2019, ADOT published the I-11 Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) which displayed the Recommended Corridor Alternative. The Recommended Alternative proposed a 2,000-foot-wide corridor to accommodate the future I-11 highway alignment, constructed at approximately 400 feet wide. Based on public and stakeholder input, adjustments were made to the proposed corridor. The Final Tier EIS, including the Preferred Corridor Alternative was released for public review on July 16, 2021. Further discussion on the I -11 corridor can be found in Chapter 2 Streets. Existing truck traffic in Buckeye consists of commercial delivery trucks and heavy trucks from industrial uses. There are four major industrial areas in the City of Buckeye which are described below and are presented in Figure 8-1. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 166 Figure 8-1. Major Industrial Areas in Buckeye BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 167 1. Perryville Road to Verrado Way (PV) I-10 Corridor - Located three miles west of Loop 303 and the I-10 interchange, the PV Corridor spans over 640 acres, offering opportunities for industrial development. The PV Corridor is prime for distribution and logistics, and business park projects as the corridor provides direct freeway visibility and access to I-10. 2. Miller Corridor - This corridor offers an ideal location for business parks, distribution and logistics, light manufacturing, and industrial developments. Spanning over 160 acres, the Miller Corridor is home to retail businesses such as Five Below, Funko, Empire Southwest, Love’s Travel Stop, and QuikTrip. 3. Buckeye Industrial Rail (85 Rail) Corridor – Centrally located in Buckeye, this rail-served complex features over three million square feet of established industrial development. Businesses that are located at the 85 Rail Corridor include Cardinal Glass Industries, Walmart Distribution Center, Ross Distribution Center, and more. The complex is suited for advanced manufacturing facilities, large-scale industrial campuses, and rail-served developments. 4. Buckeye Municipal Airport (BXK)– The BXK Airport spans over 700 acres, offering flexibility for a range of aviation and non-aviation uses. 5. SR 85 Corridor– Centrally located along the I-10 Phoenix Bypass Route, this corridor is currently home to Parker Fasteners and Arizona Public Service’s (APS) HUBwest. Its location along a planned limited-access state highway makes it ideal for commercial distribution centers and office complexes. As Buckeye’s expanding role as a freight and logistics hub continues, the growing demand for safe and accessible truck parking has also become a critical challenge. Buckeye, and the state of Arizona in general, suffers from a shortage of safe truck parking as identified in the Arizona State Freight Plan published by ADOT. This shortage, in combination with high prices at parking centers, has resulted in freight truck drivers parking in vacant and random areas throughout the community. Rail Freight Existing rail facilities in Buckeye are provided by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) connecting Arizona to California and New Mexico. The UPRR includes the Wellton Branch segment, of which a portion is inactive, limiting connectivity between Buckeye and Wellton (located west of Buckeye). According to the ADOT State Rail Plan Update, MAG and ADOT have considered several strategies to improve rail access to Phoenix, including reactivation of the Wellton Branch. The Wellton Branch is the most direct rail connection between Phoenix and southern California. While UPRR has not expressed interest in restoring the line, an alternative solution could involve incrementally reactivating segments of the Wellton Branch, contingent upon sufficient customer demand to justify the investment. The active portion of the rail line also includes the Buckeye Yard, where rail switches occur, and the previously mentioned Buckeye Industrial Rail Corridor. Further description of the UPRR in Buckeye is provided in Chapter 7, Rail. Airport Freight Buckeye Municipal Airport is the local airport that serves the City. This airport is used for general aviation and will be used for commercial cargo services once runway improvements have been made to accommodate freight operations which are discussed later in this chapter. As noted in Chapter 6, Aviation, the airport will serve as an economic hub, guided by the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 168 and a future update to the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan. Further description of the Buckeye Municipal Airport is provided in Chapter 6 Aviation. 8.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan The Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan identified recommendations relating to roadway network connectivity and the freight industry throughout the City. These goals, policies, and implementation actions are utilized in the development of the preferred truck corridors in Section 8.5 of this Chapter. Applicable goals, policies and implementation actions from the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan are identified in this section. Preferred Truck Corridors To help meet the objective of accommodating truck traffic and facilitating safe mobility throughout the City, this Plan Update identifies preferred truck corridors that highlight roadway facilities historically planned with truck traffic considerations, but their purpose is not to restrict the movement of trucks within the City. The identification of preferred truck corridors is important for connecting different industries in The City of Buckeye, but also for the region’s freight mobility goals. In doing so, it is important to ensure that the roadways and surrounding land uses are not adversely impacted by truck traffic. For example, roadways should be designed and maintained to withstand continuous wear from heavy freight vehicles. Additionally, land uses should be compatible with industries that freight supports. Land uses compatible with freight opportunities include industrial, office, commercial, and agricultural. These land uses tend to have more frequent distribution needs that benefit from roadway facility types that are planned to accommodate increased freight and trucking movements. Within these land uses are expected to be facilities compatible with trucking, such as areas that provide parking for 18-wheelers. Land use planning that is less compatible with freight may also benefit from the identification of preferred truck corridors, as such developments focused on residential and civic land uses may be planned strategically within the context of the overall freight plan. The adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan outlines support for commercial and industrial growth by establishing policies related to the development of preferred truck corridors based on truck traffic volumes, land use patterns, and regional connectivity. The following goals, policies, and implementation action from the adopted Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan supports the development of preferred truck corridors: • Goal S-9 Buckeye is a connected community with an efficient multimodal transportation network. o Policy S-9.8 The City of Buckeye will actively promote and lobby for the expansion and development of new key transportation facilities, including commuter rail and other regional transportation opportunities. • Goal S-11 Buckeye has a roadway system that is safe and efficient. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 169 o Policy S-11.4 The City of Buckeye should highlight preferred truck corridors that provide efficient connections to industrial and commercial uses and do not adversely impact residential land uses. Action 40. Develop a preferred truck corridor plan. (Mid Term) Freight in Relation to Economic Development In addition to goals and policies that support preferred truck corridors, there is also a goal and policy in the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan that encourages economic development. This development involves the export of goods which rely on the freight facilities in the City: • Goal G-14 Buckeye has low unemployment, is economically stable, and has a high standard of living. o Policy G-14.1 The City of Buckeye’s economic development strategic plan should focus on that attraction of ‘Base’ industries These collective goals, policies, and implementation action underscore a need for a freight system that supports regional economic activity. Provided in this Freight Chapter are transportation recommendations that support these goals. 8.3 Multimodal Integration The freight network encompasses an expansive commercial and industrial distribution system within the City of Buckeye involving trucking, rail, and air components. The truck network in the City enhances the mobility of goods and services by connecting markets and consumers. With this in mind, preferred truck corridors should be strategically planned to connect freight from fixed locations such as intermodal facilities with land use destinations that increase efficiency. Strategic planning includes evaluating the roadway network and surrounding land uses near key rail facilities, such as Buckeye Yard, and identify preferred truck corridors to promote circulation and mobility. Another consideration for Buckeye’s freight network is the increased distribution potential from expanding the operations of the local airport. Currently, Sky Harbor in Phoenix provides air cargo services to the region and connects freight to Buckeye’s distribution system via trucking. In order for the Buckeye Municipal airport to operate with freight capabilities, such as importing or exporting cargo, an additional 3,000 to 4,000 feet of runway would need to be extended to the existing 5,500-foot runway. This would be in addition to other runway improvements for the weight and size of cargo type aircraft. Based on the potential for the Buckeye Municipal Airport to be integrated with the freight distribution system, Palo Verde Road and Bruner Road should be prioritized as preferred truck corridors given they’ll both provide access to the airport. As mentioned in Chapter 2, there is a proposed interchange at Bruner Road and I-10 that would further support this integration. Ultimately the goal of the preferred truck corridor planning is to develop a transportation network that provides an adequate level of service to both freight and mobility. Additionally, the identification of preferred truck corridors serves as an asset inventory for roadways prone to increased road surface deterioration and congestion, which should continually be evaluated to ensure that other modes of transportation are not negatively impacted or unsafe to travel through in Buckeye. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 170 8.4 Relevant Freight Plans Several regional and state-level plans guide the development of the freight infrastructure and preferred truck corridors in Buckeye. These plans provide insights into freight movement trends, network performance, and strategic improvements that support economic development and transportation efficiency. Regional Freight Network Transportation Plan MAG published the Regional Freight Transportation Plan in December 2017, identifying existing freight infrastructure assets, network usage, and performance while proposing a comprehensive roadway freight network across Maricopa County. The plan analyzed truck annual average daily traffic (AADT) estimates, industrial employment patterns, and other key network conditions to designate regional truck routes, including I-10, SR 85, and MC 85 within Buckeye. Figure 8-2 shows the final freight network, showing truck AADT in green and industry employment in purple. While the plan initially outlined designated truck routes, it now serves as a strategic foundation for developing preferred truck corridors that enhance freight mobility and efficiency. Preferred truck corridors are identified based on regional freight movement needs, incorporating insights from the Freight Network Plan and considering factors such as truck AADT and concentrations of industrial employment. This approach ensures that freight movement is effectively integrated with land use planning, improving circulation and connectivity while supporting Buckeye’s role in regional goods distribution. Figure 8-2. MAG Regional Freight Network Report – Final Freight Network Source: MAG Regional Freight Transportation Plan, 2017. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 171 MAG MOMENTUM Regional Transportation Plan In 2021, MAG published the Regional Transportation Plan which includes a map that displays the alignment of the future State Route 30/Tres Rios Freeway (SR 30 Study), running parallel to the UPRR line. The 2050 MAG travel demand model identifies the locations of the future interchanges along the proposed SR 30, including a half interchange at MC 85 and a full interchange at Jackrabbit Trail. Knowing the locations of the SR 30 interchanges is essential in identifying preferred truck corridors as these interchanges serve as key access points to the highway system. Additionally, rail crossing improvements will require further evaluation to ensure efficient freight movement. ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan ADOT completed the Arizona State Rail Plan in 2011 and updated this plan in May 2022. This plan is a comprehensive assessment of the passenger and freight needs in the state. As mentioned previously, the Rail Plan Update discusses reactivation of the Wellton Branch, which crosses through Buckeye from California to Phoenix. MAG Truck Parking Study The MAG Truck Parking Study, completed in September 2021, assessed truck parking supply and demand in the region and the challenges drivers face finding safe parking. The study analyzed parking patterns, evaluated the impact of safety regulations, and explored how emerging technologies like autonomous trucking could affect future needs. Recommendations focused on improving parking availability and infrastructure to support freight movement. A current update to the MAG Truck Parking Study and Plan is underway to identify potential sites, explore technology solutions, and evaluate public-private partnerships. The study will guide future investments in truck parking infrastructure. 8.5 Freight Recommendations Freight-related recommendations in this TMP focus on enhancing Buckeye’s freight network through preferred truck corridors, airport development, and rail integration. The establishment of preferred truck corridors along existing and future arterial and parkway corridors supports efficient freight movement while strengthening Buckeye’s position as a key intermodal hub. Similarly, freight’s role as an economic driver at the Buckeye Municipal Airport reinforces its potential to serve regional distribution needs. The UPRR corridor remains a critical component of freight mobility, ensuring continued support for rail-based freight transport. By aligning freight planning with economic development and land use strategies, Buckeye can enhance regional connectivity, improve circulation efficiency, and strengthen its role as a growing freight hub within the Phoenix region. The integration of truck, rail, and airport infrastructure provides a cohesive approach to long-term freight mobility, fostering sustainable growth while supporting industrial and commercial expansion. The combined recommendations for rail, airport, and preferred truck corridors are illustrated on Figure 8-3 includes the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan future land use designations that would influence or that would be impacted by freight. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 172 Figure 8-3. Freight Plan Recommendations BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 173 Truck Freight Recommendations Freight truck mobility plays a critical role in facilitating goods distribution, commercial deliveries, and the transport of materials for industrial businesses in Buckeye. To support the efficient movement of freight, preferred truck corridors have been identified to align with freight-generating land uses while minimizing impacts on residential areas. These recommendations were informed by regional freight plans, future land use projections, and key infrastructure priorities outlined in the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan. Preferred truck corridors include the regional corridors that have been identified as part of the NHFN network; I-10, SR 85, and I-8. These corridors play a vital role in regional and national freight transportation. While SR 30 and the White Tanks Freeway are not currently classified as NHFN routes, the City of Buckeye recognizes their significance in the long-term expansion of the truck corridor network. As Buckeye continues to develop its freight infrastructure, these highways will serve as essential freight connections for regional and long-distance movement. Beyond freeway corridors, regional connectivity is crucial in establishing a preferred truck corridor network. Several key arterial and parkway roadways were evaluated to determine the most effective routes for freight movement. Sun Valley Parkway, Turner Parkway, and McDowell Parkway (MCDOT) provide critical links to regional freight networks, ensuring efficient movement between industrial hubs. In neighboring jurisdictions, Bell Road in Surprise serves as a preferred truck corridor, extending freight connectivity westward via Sun Valley Parkway into the City of Buckeye. Perryville Road is another key freight corridor, offering a connection from Suprise to I-10 and MC 85. In Goodyear, I-10 and MC 85 function as preferred truck corridors, with MC 85 extending westward to SR 85, strengthening regional freight movement. The roadways recommended as preferred truck corridors are listed in Table 8-1. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 174 Table 8-1. Preferred Truck Corridor Recommendations Roadway Name Extends From Extends To Designated Baseline Road Johnson Road Miller Road City Broadway Road Johnson Road MPA Boundary City Camelback Road MPA Boundary Turner Parkway City Dean Road McDowell Road Future SR 30 City Desert Creek Road McDowell Road Yuma Road City Future I-11 MPA Boundary MPA Boundary NHFN Future SR 30 MPA Boundary MPA Boundary NHFN Future White Tanks Freeway Future I-11 MPA Boundary NHFN I-10 MPA Boundary MPA Boundary NHFN Jackrabbit Trail McDowell Road Future SR 30 City Johnson Road Camelback Road Baseline Road City McDowell Road MPA Boundary Dean Road City Miller Road McDowell Road Future SR 30 City Palo Verde Road McDowell Road Future SR 30 City Southern Avenue Western MPA Boundary Dean Road City SR 85 I-10 Woods Road NHFN Sun Valley Parkway MPA Boundary McDowell Road City Turner Parkway MPA Boundary I-10 City Verrado Way McDowell Road Future SR 30 City Watson Road McDowell Parkway UPRR City Wilson Road I-10 Baseline Road City Teravalis Parkway (formerly Wintersburg Parkway)* MPA Boundary Turner Parkway City Woods Road SR 85 Enterprise Road City Yuma Road Desert Creek Road Palo Verde Road City *With the construction of another east west arterial roadway across the Hassayampa River, the preferred truck route corridor designation on Teravalis parkway will be reevaluated. Rail Freight Recommendations As noted in Chapter 7 Rail, the UPRR rail line intersects with SR 85 and will intersect the future I-11 corridor once developed. These intersections present an opportunity to develop freight hubs where truck freight and rail freight can come together to provide connectivity. Given the potential for increased truck freight traffic and the rail line’s accessibility, the City of Buckeye and UPRR should work together regarding the interaction of the rail crossings and the roadway network. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 175 Additionally, there is future potential for UPRR to establish a logistics center at the Buckeye Yard if deemed necessary by increased levels of economic activity. This would expand the capacity of goods that can be imported and exported via rail lines and the transfer of cargo to and from trucks. The City of Buckeye should work with UPRR to study the feasibility of establishing this logistics center. Air Freight Recommendations As noted in Section 8.3, there is a need to increase Buckeye Municipal Airport’s runway to accommodate freight capacities for importing and exporting goods. One of the recommendations in Chapter 5 Aviation is to update the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan. This update, which is currently underway, includes an evaluation of freight capabilities at the airport and the necessary runway extensions to accommodate such capacity. Additionally, the update assessed implications that any runway additions or extensions may have on surrounding land uses. 8.6 Freight Implementation and Funding This section describes the available funding sources and the anticipated timeline for implementation of recommendations described in this chapter. Funding The following are potential funding sources and programs that the City of Buckeye could consider for implementation of the recommendations for truck, rail, and aviation freight services in Buckeye. Provided below are the applicable federal, state and regional funding sources. Federal funds Freight-related roadway infrastructure may be funded through discretionary grant programs that support key freight mobility improvements. Programs such as INFRA and BUILD grants provide funding for projects that enhance infrastructure resilience, freight efficiency, and regional connectivity. These grants play a critical role in supporting economic development and long-term freight network improvements. Discretionary funds The BUILD (Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development) transportation discretionary grant program (formerly RAISE grants) are for regionally significant roads, bridges, transit, rail, ports or intermodal transportation projects. The INFRA (Infrastructure for Rebuilding America) discretionary grants (formerly FASTLANE grants) are a competitive funding source that can be used to fund various infrastructure project costs including reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of property, environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, equipment acquisition, and operational improvements directly related to system performance. Additional descriptions of these funds are in Chapter 6 Aviation. The Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) Grant Program provides funding for projects that enhance safety and mobility at highway-rail and pathway-rail grade crossings. Eligible projects include grade separations, track relocations, and installation of safety measures such as protective devices, signals, and signage. The program supports initiatives that reduce conflicts between rail and vehicular traffic, improving both safety and freight efficiency within key transportation corridors. The Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) Program offers funding to improve the safety, efficiency, and reliability of freight and intercity passenger rail. This program supports rail BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 176 safety technology deployment, congestion reduction measures, capital improvements to short-line and regional railroads, and rail line relocation projects. Additionally, CRISI funding can be used for multimodal connections, environmental mitigation, workforce training, and research efforts that advance innovative rail infrastructure solutions. Highway safety improvement program The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a federal-aid program aimed at a reduction in traffic fatalities and injuries on public roads, including non-state-owned roads and roads on tribal land. HSIP consists of three components, the Strategic Highway Safety Plan, State HSIP, and the Railway-Highway Crossing Program (RHCP). For aviation related freight, there is the Airport and Airway Trust Fund (Trust Fund), which is a federal fund, provided by taxes on airline ticket sales, aviation fuel, air cargo, and the flight segment tax. Airport improvements can also be implemented through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP), which is a funding mechanism for public agencies to receive funding for public-use airports. Additional descriptions of these funds are in Chapter 6 Aviation. State Programs State programs for freight include programs that have a focus on airport improvements. At the state level, funds for airports are sourced through the State Aviation Fund, which are allocated through the Airport Capital Improvement Program, developed by ADOT. The Airport Capital Improvement Program maximizes the use of both state and FAA funds. ADOT also has an Airport Loan Program, which provides funding for airport improvements to eligible airports to improve the economic status of the airport. Additional descriptions of these programs are in Chapter 6 Aviation. Regional Program Regional funds applicable to freight opportunities in Buckeye include the Arterial Life Cycle Program, which is administered by MAG. Arterial Life Cycle Program The MAG Arterial Lifecycle Program (ALCP) serves as a financial tool for the arterial street component of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The program provides information for projects spanning the 20- year life including location, regional funding, years of work, type of work, status of the project and the lead agency Implementation This Freight chapter identifies implementation recommendations for adding to the capacity of the freight network in Buckeye. Table 8-2, Table 8-3, and Table 8-4 provide a listing of the Short-term, Mid-term, and Long-term recommendations respectively. Planning-level costs and other factors related to the implementation of these actions are included in Chapter 10 Recommendations and Implementation. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 177 Table 8-2. Short-term Freight Recommendations Project Name Description Sources Preferred Truck Corridors Provide roadways listed in Table 8-1 as preferred truck corridors. TMP Source: City of Buckeye, 2023. Table 8-3. Mid-Term Freight Recommendations Project Name Description Sources Industrial Hub Development Consider developing an industrial hub at the intersection of the UPRR rail line and SR 85. TMP Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan Update Include a freight related evaluation in the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan Update. TMP Source: City of Buckeye, 2023; Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan, 2024. Table 8-4. Long-Term Freight Recommendations Project Name Description Sources Logistics Center Feasibility Study In coordination with UPRR, study the feasibility of establishing a logistics center at UPRR. TMP Source: City of Buckeye, 2023. 8.7 Summary The City of Buckeye understands the importance of freight mobility in achieving economic development goals. Many previous freight plans or studies have been conducted for the area which provided valuable insights into freight mobility planning. In support of those efforts, the City of Buckeye incorporates the NHFN designated truck routes, along with other relevant plans. To further refine preferred truck corridors, an analysis of existing and future land uses and regional connectivity was conducted, ensuring freight movement is effectively aligned with Buckeye’s development goals. The recommendations from this Freight Plan are incorporated into Chapter 10: Recommendations and Implementation of this TMP, alongside strategies from other TMP elements, including streets, transit, active transportation, aviation, rail, and ITS. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 178 9. Intelligent Transportation Systems Information in this chapter will be the direct focus of a future study and, thus, not revised as part of this 2025 TMP update. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) is the integration of advanced sensor, computer, electronics and communication technologies, and management strategies to improve the overall safety and efficiency of the surface transportation system. Types of ITS may include traffic signals, cameras, fiber optic communications, and central management software. While ITS encompasses many technical attributes of the roadway, it should be noted that ITS is different than other communication systems. Traffic operations are influenced by various factors, including signage and traffic signals. This chapter summarized the recommendations of the 2018 ITS Strategic Plan for the City of Buckeye. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 179 9.1 Existing ITS Infrastructure Currently, there are 22 intersections in Buckeye that are active and controlled by the City through ITS. These are controlled via traffic signals, while all other intersections are controlled via stop signs. As illustrated in Figure 9-1 and listed on Table 9-1, the 22 intersections with traffic signals are mainly located on the east side of SR 85 and south of I-10, although there are a few located at intersections east of Skyline Regional Park and north of I-10. In addition to the signals controlled by the City, there are others that are controlled by ADOT and some that are controlled by Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG). Also illustrated in Figure 9-1 is the location of service interchanges (which connect freeway traffic to local streets) and system interchanges (which carry traffic from one freeway to another utilizing ramps). Another existing ITS infrastructure component is a pedestrian crosswalk flasher on MC 85 near Narramore Avenue. With anticipated growth, there will be a need to integrate additional traffic signals, especially as traffic volumes increase on the roadway system and at service interchanges. 9.2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan ITS policies for Buckeye are found in the Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan. The Imagine Buckeye General Plan identified one ITS-related policy that should be addressed in implementing this ITS Chapter. • Goal S-9 Buckeye is a connected community with an efficient multimodal transportation network. o Policy S-9.1 The City of Buckeye will require new development to provide connectivity to existing transportation networks to provide accessibility and efficient connections to adjacent parcels, neighborhoods, Activity Centers, and the region. o Policy S-9.3 The City of Buckeye should ensure that the transportation network is managed, operated, and maintained efficiently. • Goal S-11 Buckeye has a roadway system that is safe and efficient. o Policy S-11.5 The City of Buckeye should continue to support the update and implementation of the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Master Plan [Strategic Plan]. This policy supports the continued implementation of the existing 2018 ITS Strategic Plan, and thus the recommendations from the ITS Strategic Plan are reflected in this chapter. The support of ITS through the General Plan and the ITS Plan are necessary as ITS can be utilized on the whole roadway network. Improving safety and efficiency on the roadway network not only benefits commuters, but also residences, business owners, and all those visiting Buckeye destinations. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 180 Figure 9-1. Existing ITS Facilities BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 181 Table 9-1. Existing 2018 Traffic Signals 9.3 Multimodal Integration ITS is a factor in reducing congestion on roadways, contributing to efficiency and safety. Because of this, ITS is highly connected and influential to all modes of transportation. This system of interconnected communications not only provides interconnectivity for the multimodal network in Buckeye, but the region as well. The ITS system will be a central component in implementing the freight network, transit network, and roadway network and ensuring that all of these networks are integrated have safe access to transit hubs, rail stops or logistic center, and the Buckeye Municipal Airport. Additionally, ITS is also a factor in creating a safe environment for active transportation, such as at crosswalks. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 182 9.4 Relevant ITS Plan 2018 ITS Strategic Plan for the City of Buckeye To support a safe roadway system, the City developed an ITS Strategic Plan in 2018. The 2018 ITS Strategic Plan for the City of Buckeye was developed in cooperation with MAG to identify strategies for the City to manage an efficient transportation system. The vision of the ITS Strategic Plan (Plan) is: “To optimize the capacity of the transportation system, improve safety, and reduce peak-hour demand on gateway arterials by facilitating real-time operation and management of the transportation network from the City’s operational center and coordinating with neighboring agencies for cross-jurisdictional operations.” The goal of the Plan is to establish guidance for a comprehensive ITS network that will adequately support buildout conditions. It will accommodate the following: • high volumes of traffic; • the need to manage traffic signals; • the need to manage fiber optic; or • the introduction of a major traffic generator. While the current transportation network in Buckeye does not experience significant congestion, the General Plan establishes that the ITS Strategic Plan should be implemented including improvements to infrastructure to ensure a safe and efficient transportation network in the future. As indicated in Chapter 1 of this TMP, Buckeye’s population is anticipated to increase by more than 500 percent between 2016 and 2050. The Plan states that increases in traffic resulting from growth warrants the implementation of a City Traffic Management Center (TMC) for the City’s ITS program. Assessment of ITS Needs Through the ITS Strategic Plan, seven roadways were identified as high priority roads for the ITS due to one or more of the following: crashes at intersections, recurring congestion, delayed emergency response times, truck/freight route, and/or freeway detour route. The following existing roads were identified as high priority roads due to these safety and mobility issues that can be addressed through ITS: Plan also identifies existing roadways that are not owned by the City, but are high priority due to the significant role they play in the Buckeye transportation network. These are: I-10, SR 85, MC 85, I-11 (future), and SR 30 (future). Coordination with the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) is necessary in planning for these roadways. - Apache Road - Broadway Road - Miller Road - Monroe Avenue - Southern Avenue - Sun Valley Parkway - Watson Road - Yuma Road BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 183 9.5 ITS recommendations Recommendations for ITS throughout Buckeye were derived from the 2018 ITS Strategic Plan and planning-level field assessment of existing traffic signals during the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) process. The ITS recommendations are divided into three project types: priority corridors, traffic signals, and ITS devices. Priority Corridors The ITS Strategic Plan identifies segments of existing roadways as Priority Corridors. These Priority Corridors are illustrated on Figure 9-2. The recommended segments of roadway for the initial deployment of fiber and additional ITS devices are listed in Table 9-2. Table 9-2. ITS Priority Corridors As recommended in the ITS Strategic Plan, the City should reevaluate and update priority roadways as growth and expansion continues. This may be done by regularly undertaking a prioritization exercise for roadways that coincide with the Buckeye Capital Improvement Program (CIP), General Plan, or TMP updates. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 184 Figure 9-2. ITS Plan Recommendations BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 185 Traffic Signals According to the ITS Strategic Plan, infrastructure deployment begins with the installation of traffic signals. Through the assessment of the transportation network during the TMP process, it is recommended that traffic signals be established at the intersections shown on Figure 9-2. The proposed locations for traffic signals are generally located at all arterial-arterial or arterial- parkway intersections. Anticipated traffic signals are located on the following roadways listed in Table 9-3. The phasing of these improvements should follow the guidance of the ITS Strategic Plan for Priority Corridors. It is understood that traffic signals may be required at other locations on a case by case basis – high school access, commercial driveway, subdivision access, office complex driveway, etc. – as such, these signals will be connected to the City’s ITS network. Table 9-3. Future Traffic Signal Roadways ITS Devices The installation of all traffic signals should include the installation of appropriate ITS devices in conformance with the ITS Strategic Master Plan. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 186 9.6 ITS Implementation and Funding Local Funding In order to accommodate the ultimate buildout of the City, ITS improvements will need to be a part of the Buckeye Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The Buckeye CIP is funded through a combination of the City general funds, federal and state funds allocated to the City, grant funds, and impact fees. While the CIP should include ITS improvements, funding for the initial installation of ITS devices will be conducted through private developers. As noted in the ITS Strategic Plan, the Priority Corridors listed in Section 9.6 are the first priorities for traffic signals and ITS devices. These priority locations should be included in the CIP. Once all priority corridors are completed, additional ITS projects should follow. Regional Funding One way that the City can acquire funding for ITS projects is through the MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is administered by MAG and identifies specific projects within a five-year schedule with funding sources identified. Through the program, MAG posts a Call for Projects, which are listings of project opportunities for which MAG has funding for. Local agencies may submit applications for such funding during the Call for Projects. Buckeye has placed many projects into the MAG TIP. State Funding The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) LPA is a State program that assists local agencies in utilizing federal funds for local government projects as well as oversight for such projects. ITS-related infrastructure is typically eligible for the LPA program. Funding for LPA projects is available through the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP), which reimburses ADOT through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Funds are made available annually at the beginning of the federal fiscal year. 9.7 Summary The City of Buckeye understands the importance of a reliable and efficient transportation system and the role ITS plays in the transportation network. This chapter incorporated recommendations of the 2018 ITS Strategic Plan for the City of Buckeye including identification of Priority Corridors, future traffic signal locations, supporting ITS devices and infrastructure, and funding opportunities. Recommendations of this ITS Chapter are incorporated in Chapter 10 (Recommendations and Implementation) of this TMP along with the recommendations of other TMP Plan Elements (Street Plan, Transit Plan, Active Transportation Plan, Aviation Plan, and Rail and Freight Plan). BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 187 10. Recommendations and Implementation Provided in this chapter is the summarized recommendations for each Chapter of the Buckeye Transportation Master Plan (TMP): Streets, Transit, Active Transportation, Aviation, Rail, Freight, ITS and Wildlife Corridors. Some recommendations are provided by reference from previous planning studies, notably the Buckeye Transit Plan, the Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan, the ITS Strategic Plan, and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Other recommendations arise from this TMP planning process. lists the identified recommendations and provides a project name, brief description, implementation timeframe (short-, mid-, and long-term), planning-level cost estimate, and responsible parties. Of note, improvements that are identified in the mid-term or long-term planning horizon may be expedited should developments occur more quickly than originally anticipated. An overview of the types of recommendations that were identified in each of the planning horizons is provided in Section 10.2 of this Chapter. 10.1 Timeframes Short-term Improvements Recommendations for the short-term planning horizon cover Fiscal Year (FY) 2027-2031, the first five years following adoption of the TMP. The recommendations provided include projects identified in the City of Buckeye CIP, projects identified for the next five years in the MAG Regional Transportation Plan, projects identified in the near-term from referenced previous planning documents, projects intended to 9 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 188 address spot improvements needed in the current transportation network, and any other project identified by the project team as a short-term critical action item. Programmed Improvements Cities, Counties, Departments of Transportation (DOTs), and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) all must program future transportation spending in improvement programs. This typically includes projects to be funded over a five-year period via a CIP (Capital Improvement Program), TIP (Transportation Improvement Program), or STIP (State Transportation Improvement Program). A review of the most recent versions of MAG TIP, MCDOT TIP, and City of Buckeye CIP are summarized and provided in Figure 10-1. This identifies the total investment in transportation projects in the most recent improvement programs within Buckeye. The projects have been funded and are scheduled for implementation. ADOT STIP is not included as any ADOT project would first be identified in the MAG TIP prior to incorporation in the ADOT STIP. Not uncommon, the largest amount of investment comes from the City of Buckeye via the CIP. The largest category of investment is roadway improvements, followed by railroad crossing improvements, and interchanges. These programmed improvements have been included in Short-term Improvements. Figure 10-1. Programmed Transportation Improvements in Buckeye MPA Mid-term Improvements Recommendations for the mid-term planning horizon cover the years FY 2031-2050. These improvements are currently not programmed but are identified as needed either through the 2040 travel demand model results or through project team and stakeholder discussions. Long-term Improvements Recommendations for the long-term planning horizon cover the years 2050-Buildout. These improvements are currently not programmed and are not identified as short-term or mid-term needs either through the 2050 travel demand model results or through project team and stakeholder discussions. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 189 Table 10-1. Programmed Transportation Improvements in Buckeye MPA Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Streets Intersection Improvements - Miller Road and Maricopa Road Complete design concept review and traffic study to justify traffic signal $3,660,000 City CIP 2025-2029 Roadway/Intersec tion Improvements: Durango Street, Miller Road to Yuma Road ROW and Design, Roadway Construction to improve and widen Durango Street from east of Miller Road to Yuma Road and Yuma Road. Intersection improvements at Yuma and Durango Road $9,055,000 City CIP 2025-2029 ROW Traffic Interchange - I-10 & Dean Road Identify and acquire the necessary right-of-way for construction of the partial cloverleaf interchange improvements and Dean Road from Van Buren Street to McDowell Road. $5,400,000 City CIP 2025-2029 Intersection Improvements: Verrado Way, Yuma Road to Van Buren Street Construct a total of two lanes, one in each direction, and widen the intersection to the ultimate layout to include associated drainage improvements $3,940,000 City CIP 2025-2029 Roadway Improvements - 247th Avenue, Roeser Road to Wier Ave Design and construct the eastern half of 247th Avenue from the Roeser Road alignment to the Wier Avenue alignment along the western boundary of the Crystal Vista development to the ultimate collector roadway (City Detail 63150). $2,709,900 City CIP 2025-2029 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 190 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Traffic Signal/Intersectio n Improvements: Apache Road & Lower Buckeye Road Design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection adjacent to Youngker High School, including the final curb returns on all four corners and installation of the final AC lift course in the middle of the intersection. $715,000 City CIP 2025-2029 Traffic Signal-Sun Valley Parkway & I-10 Complete a warrant study then collaborate with ADOT and MCDOT to install a traffic signal at the interchange utilizing all currently available ROW and current traffic signal poles. $10,500,000 City CIP 2025-2029 Traffic Signal/Intersectio n Improvements: SR 85 & Broadway Road Design to ADOT standards and construct a traffic signal at the intersection. Install ITS conduit through the interchanges and curb returns on each corner for both intersections. $5,484,000 City CIP 2025-2029 Traffic Signal/Intersectio n Improvements: SR 85 & Southern Avenue Design to ADOT Standards and construct a traffic signal, ITS conduit, curb returns on all corners. Install additional asphalt to widening for left and right turn lanes in all directions and an EB right turn lane. $11,174,400 City CIP 2025-2029 Traffic Signal/Intersectio n Improvements: SR 85 & Baseline Road Design to ADOT Standards and construct a traffic signal, ITS conduit, curb returns on all corners. Install additional asphalt to widening for left and right turn lanes in all directions and an EB right turn lane. $4,164,400 City CIP 2025-2029 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 191 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Old US 80 Patterson to Agua Caliente High Friction Surface Treatment $1,725,000 City, MCDOT TIP FY 2024-2028 Yuma Rd at Jackrabbit Trail TBD TBD City, MCDOT TIP FY 2024-2028 McDowell east of Jackrabbit Trail Roadway Improvements - City, MCDOT TIP FY 2024-2028 Gila River Bridge at Old US 80 Construct new high- capacity bridge $2,300,000 MCDOT TIP FY 2024-2028 Sun Valley Parkway Restoration Phase 5 Mill and Full Reconstruction $5,410,000 City TIP FY 2024-2028 Wintersburg Rd Buckeye Rd to Van Buren St Passing lane and Centerline Rumble Strips $2,750,000 City, MCDOT TIP FY 2024-2028 Apache Rd: Lower Buckeye Rd to SRP/WAPA powerline Construct roadway widening $2,200,562 City MAG 2050 RTP Apache Rd: Maricopa Rd to MC 85 Street improvements, new pavement, utility relocation as necessary, striping and sidewalks, rail crossing and canal crossing $2,491,474 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Baseline Rd: Turner Rd to 0.5 miles west Construct two through lanes $910,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Broadway Rd: Apache Rd to Watson Rd Construct two through lanes $7,756,320 City MAG 2050 RTP Broadway Rd: Watson Rd to 0.5 miles east Construct two through lanes $1,320,000 City MAG 2050 RTP Canyon Springs Blvd (267th Ave): Deer Valley Rd (alignment) to Pinnacle Peak Rd (alignment) Construct new four lane roadway and bridge over the CAP $5,200,000 City MAG 2050 RTP Dean Rd: RID Canal to Southern Ave Roadway widening from 2 lanes to 4 lanes, including sidewalks $11,578,367 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 192 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Durango Street: Yuma Road to 247th Avenue Construct two lane roadway. Includes ROW acquisition and all utility relocations to support installtion of a Collector Roadway $1,642,000 City MAG 2050 RTP Indian School Road: Jackrabbit Trail to Loop 303 Roadway widening from 2 to 4 lanes, including 5 traffic signals $4,150,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Jackrabbit Trl: Osborn Rd to 750 feet north of Thomas Rd Construct two through lanes $200,000 City MAG 2050 RTP Johnson Boulevard ITS: I- 10 to Monroe Avenue Install Conduit and Fiber for City ITS system in accordance with City 2018 ITS Strategic Plan. There are 6 miles of fiber, and 6 miles of conduit and is one of 6 projects to complete Fiber Communications Ring #1 $1,057,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Lower Buckeye Rd: Miller Rd to 250th Ave Construct new four lane roadway $3,110,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Monroe Avenue ITS: Johnson Road to Miller Road Install Conduit and Fiber for City ITS system in accordance with City 2018 ITS Strategic Plan. There are 7.5 miles of fiber, and 7.5 miles of conduit and is one of 6 projects to complete Fiber Communications $1,433,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Perryville Road: Van Buren St to RID Canal Construct two through lanes $1,500,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Southern Ave: Watson Rd to 231st Ave (alignment) Construct four through lanes $1,320,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 193 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Van Buren St: Sun Valley Pkwy to 0.25 miles east of Wilson Ave Construct new two lane roadway $2,275,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Verrado Way ITS: McDowell Road to Indian School Road Install Conduit and Fiber for City ITS system $782,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Warner St: Turner Rd to Westpark Loop Rd Construct new four lane roadway $4,171,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Watson Rd: Lower Buckeye Rd to Roosevelt Irrigation District Canal A development project will construct the east half of the roadway and stripe 2 NB through lanes $4,247,730 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Watson Road ITS: Lower Buckeye to I-10 Install Conduit and Fiber for City ITS system in accordance with City 2018 ITS Strategic Plan $800,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Watson Road ITS: Southern Avenue to Monroe Avenue Install Conduit and Fiber for City ITS system in accordance with City 2018 ITS Strategic Plan. There are 1 mile of fiber, and 1 mile of conduit and is one of 6 projects to complete Fiber Communications Ring #1 $180,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Wilson Ave: I-10 to Van Buren St Construct new two lane roadway $2,000,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Yuma Road: Tuthill Road to 199th Avenue, south half of the road, (Mountain View South) Construction of the ultimate half street on the South side of Yuma Road. $2,000,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 194 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Mid-term Bell Rd/287th Ave (loop): Sun Valley Pkwy (west) to Sun Valley Pkwy (east) Construct new six lane roadway $4,500,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Beardsley Road from Desert Oasis Parkway to Turner Parkway (Johnson Road) Improve to six lane major arterial $8,434,800 City Buildout Network Map Broadway Road from 231st Avenue to Apache Road Improve to six lane major arterial $8,200,000 City Buildout Network Map Bruner Road Traffic Interchange at I-10 Construction of a multi- lane grade-separated traffic interchange, roadway design, permitting, and construction management ~$50,000,000 ADOT Buildout Network Map Dean Road Traffic Interchange at I‐10 Construct new six lane roadway, Construct grade separated interchange on I‐10, Construct the ultimate signals at two intersections, ROW acquisitions for the above improvements, roadway design, permitting and construction management DNE ADOT City Prop 500 List Festival Pkwy: Sun Valley Pkwy to CAP Canal Construct new six lane roadway $9,000,000 City MAG 2050 RTP BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 195 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Greenway Rd/271st Ave (loop): Sun Valley Pkwy (west) to Sun Valley Pkwy (east Construct new six lane roadway $12,500,000 City MAG 2050 RTP I-10 & Johnson Road TI ROW Acquisition Develop conceptual interchange plans for Johnson Road and I-10 to identify the necessary ROW requirements and acquire the necessary ROW. $1,300,000 City CIP 2025-2029 Jackrabbit Trl: Bethany Home Rd to Missouri Ave Construct new two lane roadway $2,000,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Johnson Road TI at I-10 Construction of a multi- lane grade-separated traffic interchange, roadway design, permitting, and construction management ~$50,000,000 ADOT Buildout Network Map Miller Rd: Narramore Ave to Hazen Rd Roadway widening from 2 lanes to 6 lanes, including sidewalks $3,737,210 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Rainbow Road: Durango Street to RID canal Roadway widening from 2 to 4 lanes $2,980,000 City, MCDOT MAG 2050 RTP Verrado Way from 0.5 miles north of I-10 to 0.5 miles south of I-10 Improve to eight lane principal arterial $5,400,000 City Buildout Network Map Wilson Avenue half TI at I-10 Construction of a multi- lane grade-separated half traffic interchange, roadway design, permitting, and construction management ~$25,000,000 ADOT Buildout Network Map Wilson Avenue from Broadway Road to I-10 Construct new six lane major arterial $53,929,000 City Buildout Network Map BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 196 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Wilson Avenue from I-10 to Van Buren Street Improve to six lane major arterial $10,260,000 City Buildout Network Map Long-term 283rd Avenue from Woods Road to I-11 Construct new six lane major arterial $137,200,000 City Buildout Network Map 287th Avenue from Dove Valley to Black Mountain Rd Construct new six lane major arterial $41,600,000 City Buildout Network Map 315th Avenue curve between Baseline Road/309th Avenue and Southern Avenue/315th Avenue Construct new six lane major arterial $24,400,000 City Buildout Network Map 315th Avenue from Yuma Parkway north to Van Buren Street, then west along Van Buren Street (alignment) to 319th Avenue Construct new four lane arterial $32,900,000 City Buildout Network Map 319th Avenue between Southern Avenue and Broadway Road Construct new four lane arterial $23,000,000 City Buildout Network Map 323rd Avenue from Northern Parkway to Teravalis Parkway Construct new six lane major arterial $59,600,000 City Buildout Network Map Baseline Road from MPA Boundary to Johnson Road Improve to six lane major arterial $42,919,200 City Buildout Network Map Beardsley Road from 323rd Avenue Loop east to Douglas Ranch Loop Construct new six lane major arterial $17,900,000 City Buildout Network Map Beardsley Road from Douglas Ranch Loop to Wickenburg Road Construct new six lane major arterial $50,000,000 City Buildout Network Map BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 197 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Bethany Home Road from Johnson to Bethany Home Road - Glendale Loop Construct new six lane major arterial $92,200,000 City Buildout Network Map Bethany Home- Glendale Loop between Bethany Home Road and Glendale Construct new six lane major arterial loop $116,900,000 City Buildout Network Map Bruner Road from 0.5 miles north of I-10 to 0.5 miles south of I-10 Improve to eight lane principal arterial $5,400,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Bruner Road from Narramore Road to SR-30 Construct new six lane major arterial $19,900,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Bruner Road from SR-30 to Broadway Road (Alignment) Improve to six lane major arterial $43,000,740 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Bruner Road from Yuma Road to Teravalis Parkway Improve to six lane major arterial $48,238,200 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Bruner Road from Patterson Road to I-11 Construct new six lane major arterial $53,600,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Camelback Road from Turner Parkway to Johnson Road Construct new six lane major arterial $89,012,700 City Buildout Network Map Camelback Road from Johnson Road to MPA Boundary Construct new six lane major arterial $38,546,300 City Buildout Network Map Carefree Highway from 259th Avenue to Turner Parkway Construct new four lane arterial $24,809,500 City Buildout Network Map Citrus Valley Road from Enterprise Parkway to MPA boundary Construct new six lane major arterial $42,000,000 City Buildout Network Map Dean Road from 0.5 miles north of I-10 to 0.5 miles south of I-10 Improve to eight lane principal arterial $5,400,000 City Buildout Network Map BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 198 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Desert Creek Road from Southern Ave to Broadway Road Construct new four lane arterial $12,789,000 City Buildout Network Map Desert Creek from 0.5 miles north of I-10 to 0.5 miles south of I-10 Improve to eight lane principal arterial $5,400,000 City Buildout Network Map Desert Creek Road from 0.5 mi north of I-10 to Camelback Road Improve to six lane major arterial $15,849,000 City Buildout Network Map Dixileta Drive from 259th Avenue to 287th Avenue Construct new six lane major arterial $46,900,000 City Buildout Network Map Glendale Avenue West of Johnson Road Construct new four lane major arterial $4,437,000 City Buildout Network Map Glendale Avenue from Johnson Road Sun Valley Parkway Improve to six lane major arterial $11,323,800 City Buildout Network Map Glendale Avenue from Sun Valley Parkway to Bethany Home Road-Glendale Loop Construct new six lane major arterial $38,600,000 City Buildout Network Map Glendale Avenue from Jackrabbit Trail to Perryville Road Construct new six lane major arterial $10,983,600 City Buildout Network Map Greenway Road from Sun Valley Parkway to Hidden Waters Parkway Construct new six lane major arterial $108,176,400 City Buildout Network Map Hidden Waters Parkway south of the Gila River, along Old Hwy 80 Improve to six lane major arterial $108,108,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Hidden Waters Parkway from Cactus Road to White Tanks Freeway Construct new six lane major arterial, including bridge at Hassayampa River $205,586,900 City Buildout Network Map BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 199 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Indian School Road from Johnson to Hidden Waters Parkway Construct new six lane major arterial $21,200,000 City Buildout Network Map Jackrabbit Trail from 0.5 miles north of I-10 to 0.5 miles south of I-10 Improve to eight lane principal arterial $5,400,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Johnson Road from 0.5 miles north of I-10 to 0.5 miles south of I-10 Improve to eight lane principal arterial $5,400,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Johnson Road from Narramore Road to SR-30 Construct new six lane major arterial $19,500,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Johnson Road from McDowell Road to Turner Parkway (Beardsley Pkwy) Construct new six lane major arterial $328,568,900 City Buildout Network Map Jomax Road from MPA Boundary to Canyon Springs Boulevard Construct new four lane arterial $23,606,000 City Buildout Network Map Jomax Road from Canyon Springs Boulevard to 287th Avenue Construct new six lane major arterial $58,565,700 City Buildout Network Map Jomax Road from White Tanks Freeway to I-11 Construct new six lane major arterial $57,809,500 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Lone Mountain Road from 259th Avenue to 287th Avenue Construct new six lane major arterial $48,973,900 City Buildout Network Map Lower Buckeye Road from Watson Road to Perryville Road Improve to six lane major arterial $29,581,200 City Buildout Network Map Lower Buckeye Road from Turner Parkway to Palo Verde Road Construct new four lane arterial $15,500,000 City Buildout Network Map MC-85 from west MPA boundary to Apache Road Improve to six lane major arterial $12,781,800 MCDOT Buildout Network Map BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 200 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source MC-85 from west MPA boundary to Apache Road Improve to six lane major arterial $135,000,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map MC-85 from Miller Rd to Turner Road Improve to six lane major arterial $21,060,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map MC-85 from Turner Road to Johnson Road Construct new six lane major arterial $80,953,200 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Old McDowell Road from Jackrabbit Trail to McDowell Road Improve to six lane major arterial $14,585,400 City Buildout Network Map Old McDowell Road from McDowell Road to Watson Road Improve to six lane major arterial $5,610,600 City Buildout Network Map McDowell Road from Bruner Road to 315th Avenue Construct new four lane arterial $34,200,000 City Buildout Network Map Miller Road from SR 30 to Southern Avenue Improve to six lane arterial $21,767,400 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Miller Road from 0.5 miles north of I-10 to 0.5 miles south of I-10 Improve to eight lane principal arterial $5,400,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Narramore Road from Rooks Road to MPA Boundary Construct new six lane major arterial $197,049,800 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Northern Avenue from east MPA boundary to west MPA boundary Construct new six lane major arterial $327,753,000 City Buildout Network Map Old US-80 from SR-85 to MPA Boundary Construct new SR-30 freeway DNE ADOT Buildout Network Map Olive Avenue from Turner Parkway to Johnson Road Construct new six lane major arterial $94,923,000 City Buildout Network Map Olive Avenue from Johnson Road to MPA Boundary Construct new six lane major arterial $32,835,000 City Buildout Network Map Palo Verde Road from Elliot Road to SR-30 Construct new six lane major arterial $54,900,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Palo Verde Road from 0.5 miles north of I-10 to Improve to eight lane principal arterial $5,400,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 201 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source 0.5 mile south of I-10 Patterson Road from Bruner Road to Hidden Waters Parkway Construct four lane arterial $7,975,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Patterson Road from SR-85 to Bruner Road Construct new six lane major arterial $48,357,000 City Buildout Network Map Patton Road from Eastern MPA Boundary to Western MPA Boundary Improve to six lane major arterial $54,550,800 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Peoria Avenue from Turner Parkway to Olive Avenue Construct new four lane arterial $81,330,500 City Buildout Network Map Southern Avenue from MPA Boundary to 315th Avenue Construct six lane major arterial (river crossing) $39,800,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Southern Avenue from Johnson Road to Apache Road Improve to six lane major arterial $43,200,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Southern Avenue from Dean Road to MPA Boundary Construct new six lane major arterial $19,900,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Sun Valley Parkway from MPA boundary to Narramore Road Improve to eight lane principal arterial $64,800,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Thomas Road from Tonopah- Salome Highway to MPA Boundary Construct new six lane major arterial $17,910,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Thomas Road from Turner Parkway to Sun Valley Parkway Construct new six lane major arterial $33,600,000 City Buildout Network Map Turner Parkway from 271st Avenue to Pinnacle Peak Road Improve to six lane parkway $5,724,000 City Buildout Network Map Turner Parkway from I-10 to Improve to six lane parkway $18,441,000 City Buildout Network Map BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 202 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Bethany Home Road Turner Parkway near Bell Road Grade separated City Buildout Network Map Turner Road from Broadway Road to Van Buren Street Construct four lane arterial $49,010,000 City Buildout Network Map Turner Road from SR-30 to Broadway Road Improve to six lane major arterial $39,960,000 City Buildout Network Map Turner Road from Narramore Road to SR-30 Construct new six lane major arterial $8,000,000 City Buildout Network Map Tuthill Road from Yuma Road to Verrado Way Construct four lane arterial $4,350,000 City Buildout Network Map Van Buren Street from Airport Road (Verrado) to Dean Road Improve to 4 lane arterial $5,400,000 City Buildout Network Map Van Buren Street from Turner Parkway to Sun Valley Parkway Construct new six lane major arterial $51,143,000 City Buildout Network Map Watson Road from SR-30 to Southern Avenue Improve to six lane major arterial $21,600,000 City Buildout Network Map Watson Road from I-10 to Roosevelt Street Improve to six lane major arterial $4,158,000 City Buildout Network Map Watson Road from Roosevelt Street to McDowell Road Improve to four lane major arterial $2,970,000 City Buildout Network Map Watson Road from 0.5 miles north of I-10 to 0.5 miles south of I-10 Improve to eight lane principal arterial $5,400,000 City Buildout Network Map Wilson Avenue from Van Buren Street to Bell Road Construct new six lane major arterial $274,421,000 City Buildout Network Map Woods Road from Enterprise Road to Old US Highway 80 Construct new six lane major arterial $39,601,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map Woods Road from Old US Highway 80 to SR-85 Improve to six lane major arterial $14,148,000 MCDOT Buildout Network Map BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 203 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Yuma Road from 331st to Desert Creek Construct new six lane major arterial $25,074,000 City Buildout Network Map Transit* Mid-term Fixed Route Bus Service Provide Fixed Route Bus Service on all arterials - Valley Metro TMP Rapid Bus Transit Route Future White Tanks Freeway $11.0/ revenue mile from O&M Valley Metro TMP Rapid Bus Transit Route Future I-11 Freeway $11.0/ revenue mile from O&M Valley Metro TMP Rapid Bus Transit Route I-10 Freeway $11.0/ revenue mile from O&M Valley Metro TMP Rapid Bus Transit Route McDowell Road (with 1.5-mile connection on 319th Avenue) $11.0/ revenue mile from O&M Valley Metro TMP Rapid Bus Transit Route SR 85 (connecting through Downtown Buckeye, terminating at Jackrabbit Trail park-n- ride) $11.0/ revenue mile from O&M City TMP Park-N-Ride and Transit Center I-10 and Palo Verde Road DNE City TMP Park-N-Ride and Transit Center Miller Road and MC 85 DNE City TMP Transit Center Turner Parkway and Peoria Avenue DNE City TMP Transit Center Van Buren Street and Verrado Way DNE City TMP Park-N-Ride Sun Valley Parkway and Turner Parkway DNE City TMP Park-N-Ride Sun Valley Parkway and Northern Avenue DNE City TMP Park-N-Ride I-10 and 319th Avenue DNE City TMP Park-N-Ride I-10 and Miller Road DNE City TMP Long-term Transit Center Turner Parkway and Patton Road DNE City TMP Transit Center Bruner Road and Riggs Road DNE City TMP Park-N-Ride Future I-11 at Douglas Ranch DNE City TMP Park-N-Ride SR 85 and Patterson Road DNE City TMP Active Transportation BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 204 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Short-term Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan Regularly review and update the bicycle and pedestrian master plan - City, MAG General Fund, Grants, RTP Funding Strategy Identify and secure potential funding sources to support recommendations from the bicycle and pedestrian master plan - City, MAG Local, State, and Federal Grants Cooperative Planning Seek opportunities for collaborative planning with regional and state agencies to enhance active transportation networks - City, MAG, ADOT, MPOs Various Funding Opportunities Aviation* Short-term Airport capital improvement North Land Acquisition (74 Acres) - Phase I $7,400,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement North Land Acquisition (74 Acres) - Phase II $7,400,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Design T-Hangar Construction $100,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Design Automobile Parking and Access - Phase I $200,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement North Land Acquisition (74 Acres) - Phase III $7,400,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Construct 30 T-Hangars $1,500,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Construct Automobile Parking and Access - Phase I $1,100,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Design Aircraft Wash Rack $100,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Design North Access Road $200,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Design Helipad and Hardstands $100,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 205 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Airport capital improvement Design Northeast Access Road $200,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement North Land Acquisition (74 Acres) - Phase IV $7,400,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Construct Aircraft Wash Rack $500,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Construct North Access Road $1,200,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Construct Helipad and Two Hardstands $700,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Airport capital improvement Construct Northeast Access Road $1,500,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan 2007 Mid-term Water system Design and construction for proposed domestic water system and fire protection system infrastructure. $11,800,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study Sewer system Design and construct a complete sanitary wastewater sewer system infrastructure in three independent sewer improvement sections. $5,100,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study Electrical Utilize primary power on Palo Verde Road as underground service. Convert the existing overhead secondary power on the airport to buried duct banks and convert 1,000 feet of existing power poles along Yuma Road to buried service. DNE City Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study Communications Shared trench electrical and telephone services on property and cable service followed by conduit for voice and data transmission infrastructure. $3,400,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 206 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Natural Gas System While Southwest Gas has indicated that it is unlikely that natural gas facilities will be available on Palo Verde Road, the City of Buckeye has identified possible infrastructure that could service facilities at the airport. $1,300,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study Utility Corridors Utility corridors are recommended to be identified for future water, sewer, electric, ITS, telecommunications, and gas utilities. Drainage is not to be placed in such corridors. There is no specified cost detailed for these improvements City Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study Drainage Six tributary drainage sub-areas with drainage features that are grouped into four systems: off-site drainage system, on-site infield retention system, on-site storm drain system, on-site graded system with swales. $7,600,000 City Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study Rail* Long-term Commuter Rail – Estrella / San Tan Lune Corridor Support the initial Commuter Rail Service from Baseline Road to Miller Road on Wellton Branch $2.9 billion ($29.3 million/mile) Multiple Agencies MAG 2018 Commuter Rail Study Logistics Center Implementation Implement a future logistics center at the Buckeye Yard if deemed necessary by UPRR. No specified cost detailed UPRR, City ADOT State Rail Plan Freight Short-term Baseline Road Preferred Truck Corridor Miller Road to Johnson Road DNE City TMP BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 207 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Interstate 10 Preferred Truck Corridor Entire Route DNE NHFN TMP Jackrabbit Trail Preferred Truck Corridor SR 30 to McDowell Road DNE MCDOT TMP Johnson Road Preferred Truck Corridor Baseline Road to Camelback Road DNE City TMP MC 85 Preferred Truck Corridor Perryville Road to Johnson Road DNE City TMP Miller Road Preferred Truck Corridor SR 30 to McDowell Road DNE City TMP Palo Verde Road Preferred Truck Corridor SR 30 to I-10 DNE City TMP Southern Avenue Preferred Truck Corridor Perryville Road to Western MPA Boundary DNE City TMP SR 85 Preferred Truck Corridor Entire Route DNE NHFN TMP Sun Valley Parkway Preferred Truck Corridor I-10 to Eastern MPA Boundary DNE City TMP Watson Road Preferred Truck Corridor SR 30 to McDowell Road DNE City TMP Woods Road Preferred Truck Corridor SR 85 to Enterprise Road DNE City TMP Yuma Road Preferred Truck Corridor Palo Verde Road to Desert Creek Road DNE City TMP Mid-term Broadway Road Preferred Truck Corridor Perryville Road to Johnson Road DNE City TMP Camelback Road Preferred Truck Corridor Turner Parkway to Johnson Road DNE City TMP Camelback Road Preferred Truck Corridor Johnson Road to Western MPA Boundary DNE City TMP Desert Creek Road Preferred Truck Corridor Yuma Road to McDowell Road DNE City TMP BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 208 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source Greenway Road Preferred Truck Corridor Turner Parkway to Hidden Water Parkway DNE City TMP Interstate 11 Preferred Truck Corridor Entire Route DNE NHFN TMP SR 30 Preferred Truck Corridor Entire Route DNE NHFN TMP Patterson Road Preferred Truck Corridor SR 85 to Hidden Waters Parkway DNE City TMP Turner Parkway Preferred Truck Corridor I-10 to Black Mountain Road DNE City TMP Teravalis Parkway Preferred Truck Corridor Western MPA Boundary to Turner Parkway DNE City TMP Long-term Hidden Waters Parkway Preferred Truck Corridor Woods Road to Western MPA Boundary DNE City TMP Hidden Waters Parkway Preferred Truck Corridor Teravalis Parkway to White Tanks Freeway DNE City TMP White Tanks Freeway Preferred Truck Corridor Entire Route DNE NHFN TMP McDowell Road Preferred Truck Corridor Jackrabbit Trail to Western MPA Boundary DNE City TMP Northern Avenue Preferred Truck Corridor Turner Parkway to 319th Avenue DNE City TMP ITS* Short-term ITS - Roosevelt Street - Verrado Way to Jackrabbit Trail (FIBER ONLY) Install fiber optic cable within existing conduit between Verrado Way and Jackrabbit Trail. Splice new system into Verrado Way system to be installed in 2023 via ADOT administered project. Splice Roosevelt Costco and Roosevelt/Jackrabbit traffic signals to be $120,000 City CIP 2025-2029 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 209 Project Name Description Cost Estimate Responsible Party, Partners Recommendation Source connected to the City ITS system. ITS - Watson Road, Southern Avenue to Lower Buckeye Road Install an ITS conduit duct bank on west side of Watson Road between Southern Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road with splice vaults located adjacent to each traffic signal controller cabinets (NW corners). $300,000 City CIP 2025-2029 ITS - Yuma Road, Miller Road to 237th Lane ADOT will deliver the design and construction on this project. This CIP project is for budgeting the match funding. Install an ITS duct bank (two 7-duct Duraline conduits) on the north side of Yuma Road between Miller Road and 237th Lane with splice vaults located adjacent to each traffic signal controller cabinets. $300,000 ADOT CIP 2025-2029 Watson Road from I-10 to Southern Avenue Miles of Fiber: 3.5 $1,400,000 City Buckeye ITS Strategic Plan Miles of Conduit: 3 Traffic Signal Links: 4 CCTV: 4 Detection Equipment: 16 Provides signal optimization and congestion relief along Watson from I-10 to current southern terminus *Transit, Aviation, Rail, and ITS improvements were not revised as part of this 2025 TMP update; however, costs have been adjusted to reflect 2025 dollars. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 210 10.2 Cost Estimating For some transportation modes, previous planning documents provided cost estimates for the plan recommendations. When this information was available, it was used in cost estimating. In instances where cost estimates were not previously developed, cost estimates were created by using unit costs and estimating the total miles of each improvement type. Streets Cost estimates for the Street recommendations were calculated using a unit cost of dollars per mile of new roadway and dollars per lane-mile of roadway widening. Table 10-2 provides the unit costs that were used in these calculations. Several supporting assumptions were made in determining the unit cost. First, the cost estimates are presented in 2025 dollars. Right-of-Way (ROW) will be primarily acquired through the land development process; any additional ROW needed is anticipated to be minimal and is accounted for in the unit cost. Unit costs were developed on a cost per lane-mile basis and are based on recent cost history from MAG, MCDOT, and other MAG member cities. The roadway cost estimates for both new and widening scenarios reflect the cost of construction of the full cross section for that roadway classification for new roadways or the cost for the additional lanes for widened roadways, including subbase, base, paving, curb and gutter, median, sidewalks, utility relocation, pavement markings, drainage, and any other items, as needed, to adequately construct the roadway. The total miles of each new roadway type or total lane-miles of roadway widening were multiplied by the unit costs to provide the planning-level cost estimate indicated in Table 10-2, Street Network Unit Costs. Table 10-2. Street Network Unit Costs Improvement Type Unit Unit Cost Roadway Widening 1 lane‐mi $2,700,000 Collector Roadway 1 mi $8,100,000 4‐Lane Arterial Roadway 1 mi $14,500,000 6‐Lane Major Arterial Roadway 1 mi $19,900,000 6‐Lane Parkway 1 mi $21,700,000 8‐Lane Parkway 1 mi $27,200,000 Traffic Signal 1 each $886,000 In addition to constructing roadways, the operations and maintenance of the roadway once built is a significant investment by the City. Provided in Table 10-3 is the unit costs used to calculate the cost to operate and maintain the full roadway network once constructed. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 211 Table 10-3. Annual Street Maintenance Costs Maintenance Type Unit Unit Cost Traffic Control Signals Each $2,940.62 Storm Drainage Linear foot $0.00 Exterior Lighting, Pole Each $43.80 Road, Surfaced Square yard $0.84 Sidewalk and Walkway Square yard $0.00 Grounds Drainage Dams Each $2,577.45 Road, Unsurfaced Square yard $0.48 Transit Cost estimates for the Transit recommendations were collected from the 2016 Buckeye Transit Plan and were incorporated into Table 10-1, Programmed Transportation Improvements in Buckeye MPA. No unit cost calculations were conducted as part of this process. Active Transportation Cost estimates for the Active Transportation recommendations were not provided. Cost estimating for these facilities will be conducted as part of the upcoming Buckeye Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Aviation Cost estimates for the Aviation recommendations were collected from the 2007 Buckeye Municipal Airport Master Plan, the 2009 Buckeye Municipal Airport Noise Compatibility Study, and the Buckeye Municipal Airport Drainage and Utilities Study. These cost estimates were incorporated Table 10-1, Programmed Transportation Improvements in Buckeye MPA. No unit cost calculations were conducted as part of this process. An Airport Master Plan is currently underway. Rail Cost estimates for the Rail recommendations were collected from the Commuter Rail System Study Update and the Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study. These cost estimates were incorporated into Table 10-1, Programmed Transportation Improvements in Buckeye MPA No unit cost calculations were conducted as part of this process. Freight Cost estimates for the Freight recommendations were not provided. ITS Cost estimates for the ITS recommendations were collected from the 2018 ITS Strategic Plan and were incorporated into Table 10-1, Programmed Transportation Improvements in Buckeye MPA. No unit cost calculations were conducted as part of this process. 10.3 Responsible Parties In order to effectively implement recommendations identified in this TMP the City of Buckeye must work with partnering agencies on many of the projects. Provided in this section is a description of each of the partnering agencies and the types of improvements they will be a critical partner in. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 212 City of Buckeye The City of Buckeye will be responsible for implementing transportation infrastructure either through City funds, developer-paid infrastructure, or in partnership with the agencies included herein. The City will be expected to maintain roadways that are under their jurisdiction and will need to collaborate with other agencies as they look to invest in transportation infrastructure within the Buckeye MPA. Arizona Department of Transportation Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) is the multimodal transportation agency for the State of Arizona. The department is responsible for planning, designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining State Highways and Interstates, such as I-10, SR 85, and any future highways such as I-11 and SR 30, among others. Additionally, ADOT’s Aeronautics Group will be involved in any plans or improvements to Buckeye’s Municipal Airport. Maricopa Association of Governments Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) is a Council of Governments (COG), which serves as the regional planning and policy agency for the metropolitan Phoenix area. MAG is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the region and is charged with planning the regional transportation system. As the MPO for the region, MAG prepares the Regional Transportation Plan and manages the Transportation Improvement Program. Additionally, MAG has conducted several framework studies that are referenced in this TMP and has been a valuable partner in conducting the travel demand modeling results for this TMP. Maricopa County Department of Transportation Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) plans, designs, builds, maintains, and operates roadways within unincorporated areas of Maricopa County, as well as MC85. To guide the design and development of these roadways, the County relies on two planning documents, the Transportation System Plan (TSP) 2040 and the Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP). Additionally, MCDOT provides design standards for Parkways that will be utilized in implementing future Parkways in Buckeye. The MCDOT TSP 2040 identified improvements to several roadways within the Buckeye MPA, including: Roosevelt Street Sun Valley Parkway Beloat Road Broadway Road Lower Buckeye Road McDowell Road Southern Avenue Dean Road Elliot Road Hazen Road Jackrabbit Trail Tuthill Road Yuma Road Indian School Road MC 85 These improvements have been documented in BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 213 Table 10-1, Programmed Transportation Improvements in Buckeye MPA, as projects in which MCDOT is responsible for implementing roadway improvements, whether through County funds or through developer-paid infrastructure. Union Pacific Railroad Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) is a Class I freight hauling railroad company with a facility located within Buckeye. The Wellton Branch is owned and maintained by UPRR. UPRR will need to be involved in any planning for infrastructure that may impact their operations including any railroad crossings or commuter rail opportunities. Valley Metro Valley Metro is the regional public transportation agency for the Phoenix metropolitan area. Valley Metro has been a valuable partner to the City of Buckeye including conducting the 2016 Buckeye Transit Plan. As Buckeye continues to measure when and how to implement transit as the City grows, Valley Metro will be an important partner in these efforts. 10.4 Funding Sources Over 56% of the TMP planning area consists of privately-owned land and another 15% consists of land owned by the Arizona State Land Department. For these areas, much of the recommended improvements would be constructed by a developer at the time of development. However, the remaining 29% of the land in the planning area consists of land owned by Bureau of Land Management, Arizona Game and Fish, Military Reservation, and Bureau of Reclamation. For these areas, it is anticipated development would not occur and therefore the cost of designing and constructing the transportation improvements may need to be paid by a combination of City, County, regional, state or federal funds. Additionally, the City may need to expedite a transportation project rather than waiting for development to occur through utilization of its scalloped streets ordinance. Funding at the federal, state, regional, and local level may be available for the projects identified in the TMP. The potential funding sources available for TMP implementation are summarized in Table 10-4. . BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 214 Table 10-4. Funding Sources Revenue Sources Description Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program Provides a flexible funding source to State and local governments for transportation projects and programs to help meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Funding is available to reduce congestion and improve air quality for areas that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter (nonattainment areas) and for former nonattainment areas that are now in compliance (maintenance areas). Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a federal-aid program with the purpose of reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads, including non-state owned roads and roads on tribal land. Federal Transit Administration – 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grant Program Provides federal funding, with a local match, to urbanized areas and states for transit capital, operating assistance, and transportation related planning. Federal Transit Administration – 5309 Capital Investment Grant Program Provides federal funding for major capital investments, including heavy rail, commuter rail, and bus rapid transit. Projects seeking funding through this program must complete a series of steps over several years to be eligible for funding. Federal Transit Administration – 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program Provides federal funding to states or local government authorities for the purpose of assisting private nonprofit groups in meeting the transportation needs of the elderly and persons with disabilities. Transit-Oriented Development Plan (TOD) Provides funding for efforts associated with an eligible transit project for which the project sponsor will seek funding through FTA's Capital Investment Grants Program. TOD focuses growth on transit stations to create compact, mixed-use communities with easy access to jobs and services. TOD capitalizes on public investments in transit and supports transit systems by increasing ridership and fare revenue. State of Good Repair and Rail Replacement Program The program provides financial assistance to transit agencies that operate fixed-guideway and high-intensity motorbus systems for the maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of capital assets, including competitive grants for rail BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 215 Revenue Sources Description rolling stock, as well as for the development and implementation of transit asset management plans. Federal Transit Administration – Joint Development Program Program to facilitate the coordinated development of transit facilities with non-transit commercial and residential projects. The Joint Development program allows FTA grant recipients to use FTA capital grant program funds or FTA- funded real property for joint development. Federal Transit Administration – Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities The program makes funding available to states, designated recipients, and local governmental entities that operate fixed route bus services to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities including technological changes or innovations to modify low- or no- emission vehicles or facilities. Funding is provided through formula allocations and competitive grants. Expedited Project Delivery Pilot Program Program intended to expedite the delivery of new fixed guideway capital projects, small start projects, or core capacity improvement projects that utilize public-private partnerships. Federal Transit Administration – Innovated Coordinated Access and Mobility Pilot Program Provides support for mobility enhancement such as, financing innovative projects for the transportation disadvantaged that improve the coordination of transportation services and non- emergency medical transportation services, regional or statewide mobility management projects, deployment of coordination technology; and regional or statewide projects that create or increase access to one-call/one-click centers. Federal Transit Administration – Low or No Emission Vehicle Program – 5339(c) Designed to support the transition of the nation's transit fleet to the lowest polluting and most energy-efficient transit vehicles. The Low-No Program provides funding to state and local governmental authorities for the purchase or lease of zero-emission and low-emission transit buses, including the acquisition, construction, and leasing of required supporting facilities. Federal Highway Administration - Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment Program (ATIIP) The ATIIP provides funding for planning, design, and construction projects through discretionary grants to eligible entities to plan, design, and construct eligible projects that provide safe and connected active transportation infrastructure in an active transportation network or active BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 216 Revenue Sources Description transportation spine. Active transportation networks are facilities built for active transportation, including sidewalks, bikeways, and pedestrian and bicycle trails, that connect between destinations within a community or metropolitan region. Active transportation spines are facilities built for active transportation, including sidewalks, bikeways, pedestrians, and bicycle trails, that connect communities, metropolitan regions, or states. Federal Highway Administration – Charging & Fueling Infrastructure (CFI) Discretionary Grant The program is designed to strategically deploy publicly accessible electric vehicle charging infrastructure, hydrogen fueling infrastructure, propane fueling infrastructure, and natural gas fueling infrastructure along designated alternative fuel corridors or in certain other locations within communities that will be accessible to all drivers. Federal Highway Administration – Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-Saving Transportation (PROTECT) Formula Program PROTECT is a dedicated program to apportion funds through the FHWA to every state in fixed percentages. A portion of these funds are required to be used for resilience-related planning such as developing a Resilience Improvement Plan, infrastructure improvements to withstand weather events, and community resilience efforts. US Department of Transportation – 2023-2026 Accelerated Innovation Deployment (AID) Demonstration The program provides incentive funding for any project activities eligible for assistance under title 23 U.S.C. in any phase of a highway transportation project between project planning and project delivery that address the following TIDP goals: significantly accelerate the adoption of innovative technologies by the surface transportation community; provide leadership and incentives to demonstrate and promote state-of-the-art technologies, elevated performance standards, and new business practices in highway construction processes that result in improved safety, faster construction, reduced congestion from construction, and improved quality and user satisfaction; construct longer-lasting highways through the use of innovative technologies and practices that lead to faster construction of efficient and safe highways and bridges; improve highway efficiency, safety, mobility, reliability, service life, environmental BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 217 Revenue Sources Description protection, and sustainability; develop and deploy new tools, techniques, and practices to accelerate the adoption of innovation in all aspects of highway transportation; and disseminate and evaluate information from accelerated market readiness efforts, including non-market-ready technologies, to public and private entities. US Department of Transportation – Advanced Transportation Technologies and Innovative Mobility Deployment (ATTIMD) aka Advanced Transportation Technologies and Innovation (ATTAIN) The ATTIMD or ATTAIN program provides competitive grants to deploy, install, and operate advanced transportation technologies to improve safety, mobility, efficiency, system performance, intermodal connectivity, and infrastructure return on investment. These technology deployments are intended to demonstrate how emerging transportation technologies, data, and their applications can be effectively deployed and integrated with existing systems to provide access to essential services and other destinations. This also includes efforts to increase connectivity to employment, education, services, and other opportunities; support workforce development; or contribute to increased mobility, particularly for persons with visible and hidden disabilities and elderly individuals. US Department of Transportation – Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) discretionary grant program with $100 million appropriated annually for fiscal years (FY) 2022-2026. The SMART program was established to provide grants to eligible public sector agencies to conduct demonstration projects focused on advanced smart community technologies and systems to improve transportation efficiency and safety. US Department of Transportation – Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) The RAISE program is awarded on a competitive basis, per statute, for surface transportation infrastructure projects that will improve safety; environmental sustainability; quality of life; mobility and community connectivity; economic competitiveness and opportunity including tourism; state of good repair; partnership and collaboration; and innovation. US Department of Transportation – Multimodal Project Discretionary Grant The Mega Program (known statutorily as the National Infrastructure Project Assistance program) will support large, complex projects that are difficult to fund by other means and BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 218 Revenue Sources Description likely to generate national or regional economic, mobility, or safety benefits. These projects could include: a highway or bridge project on the national highway system, freight network improvements, and rail network improvements. US Department of Transportation – Multimodal Project Discretionary Grant This program provides Federal financial assistance to highway and bridge, intercity passenger rail, railway-highway grade and separation, wildlife crossing, public transportation, marine highway, and freight and multimodal projects, or groups of such project, or national or regional significance, as well as to projects to improve and expand the surface transportation infrastructure in rural areas US Department of Transportation – National Significant Freight and Highway Projects (INFRA) The Nationally Significant Freight & Highway Projects program, also known as "INFRA", awards competitive grants for multimodal freight and highway projects of national or regional significance to improve the safety, efficiency, and reliability of the movement of freight and people in and across rural and urban areas. US Department of Transportation – Reconnecting Communities Pilot Discretionary Grant Program The purpose of the program is to reconnect communities by removing, retrofitting, or mitigating transportation facilities such as highways and rail lines that create barriers to community connectivity including mobility, access, or economic development. The program provides technical assistance and grants funding for planning and capital construction to address infrastructure barriers, restore community connectivity, and improve people's lives. Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) The purpose of SS4A grants is to improve roadway safety by significantly reducing or eliminating roadway fatalities and serious injuries through safety action plan development and refinement and implementation focused on all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation users, motorists, personal conveyance and micromobility users, and commercial vehicle operators. The program provides funding to develop the tools to help strengthen a community's approach to roadway safety and save lives and is designed to meet the needs of diverse local, Tribal, and regional communities that differ dramatically in size, BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 219 Revenue Sources Description location, and experience administering Federal funding. Airport and Airway Trust Fund This is the main funding source for federal aviation programs as well as funds the Feral Aviation Administration (FAA). The Trust Fund is funded through taxes on airline ticket sales, aviation fuel, air cargo, and the flight segment tax. Funds from the Trust are distributed annually by the FAA from appropriations by Congress. Funding may cover both capital and operating costs. Airport Improvement Program Provides grants to public agencies for public-use airport. An eligible airport must be a part of the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), which identifies existing and proposed airports that are eligible for AIP grants due to their significance to national air transportation. As of 2017, Buckeye Municipal Airport is listed as a NPIAS airport. Federal Railroad Administration – Railroad Crossing Elimination Program The purpose of the railroad crossing elimination program is to fund highway-rail or pathway-rail grade crossing improvement projects that focus on improving the safety and mobility of people and goods. Federal Railroad Administration – Innovative Finance and Asset Concession Grant Program (IFACGP) The objective of the IFACGP is to facilitate and evaluate public-private partnerships in which the private sector partner could assume a greater role in project planning, development, financing, construction, maintenance, and operation, including by assisting eligible entities in entering into Asset Concessions. A significant focus of the IFACGP is to identify Existing Assets that have the potential to provide additional public benefits through asset concessions. Under the Program, Eligible Entities can procure Advisors, hire employees into a public agency, or both, to administer Proposed Activities. Housing & Urban Development – Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program The CDBG is a flexible program that provides communities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs. The CDBG entitlement program allocates annual grants to larger cities and urban counties to aid in developing viable communities. The emphasis is on the development and provision of decent housing; a suitable living environment; and BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 220 Revenue Sources Description opportunities to expand economic opportunities in the community. State Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) The State of Arizona taxes motor fuels and collects a variety of fees and charges relating to the registration and operation of motor vehicles on public highways. These collections include gasoline and use-fuel taxes, motor-carrier taxes, vehicle license taxes, motor vehicle registration fees and other miscellaneous fees. These revenues are deposited in the HURF and are then distributed to the cities, towns and counties and to the State Highway Fund for highway construction, improvements, and other related expenses. The City of Buckeye can request HURF funding through the MAG TIP. Vehicle License Tax (VLT) The VLT is included as part of the annual vehicle registration fee. This is based on the assessed value of the vehicle. Revenue from this tax goes into the HURF fund. Arizona Aviation Fund Distribution of these funds is allocated through the Airport Capital Improvement Program, developed by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), which maximizes the use of both state and FAA funds. State funds are derived from flight property tax, aircraft lieu taxes, and aviation fuel taxes. Funds within the State Aviation Fund are distributed between design/construction projects, planning projects, and land acquisition. The State Transportation Board approves the distribution of these funds annually. Through the Fund, the state can match federal grants and can also provide state-funded grants for airport projects that qualify. ADOT also has an Airport Loan Program, which provides funding for airport improvements to eligible airports. Such loans are provided to improve the economic status of the airport. ADOT Local Public Agency (LPA) State program that assists local agencies in utilizing federal funds for local government projects as well as oversight for such projects. Regional Local Transportation Excise Tax Municipalities can adopt a transportation excise tax that ranges between 0.2% and 0.5%. In Maricopa County, there has been a voter- approved half-cent sales tax through Prop 479 (formerly Prop 400), called the Transportation BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 221 Revenue Sources Description Excise Tax (TET). Revenue from Prop 479 provides a potential funding source for the arterial life cycle program, regional freeway systems, and transit services at the local level. The regional sales tax was renewed in 2025. Projects that are submitted to Maricopa County for funding are incorporated into the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Local Transportation Assistance Fund II (LTAF) LTAF is a public transportation fund that is funded through the Arizona lottery proceeds. In Maricopa County, funds for public transportation are capped at $18 million. MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Funding program that identifies specific projects within a five-year schedule. Through the program, MAG lists Calls for Projects, which are listings of project opportunities for which they have funding for. MAG Traffic Signal Optimization Program (TSOP) Provides technical assistance to agencies that own and operate traffic signal systems. The program allocates a total of $500,000 (as of FY 2020) for TSOP projects, for which local agencies can submit applications through Calls for Projects. MAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans and First Time Updates Program This program provides funding for member agencies to develop bicycles and pedestrian master plans. Projects for this program are annually recommended through the MAT Active Transportation Plan. MAG Design Assistance Program The MAG Design Assistance Program funds assistance projects for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Local Private Funds Private funds are provided by land developers and are used as part of a land development project. General Fund The general fund accounts for the majority of the financial resources of the City that are not accounted for in other funds. It includes property taxes, local taxes, and service charges. While the general fund is a potential funding source for some transportation projects, it is recommended that other sources be used primarily so that the general fund can be conserved for City operations. BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 222 Appendix A: City of Buckeye National Community Survey Buckeye, AZ The National Community Survey Report of Results 2023 Visit us online! www.polco.us National Research Center at Polco is a charter member of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices. Report by: About The NCS™ The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is about the “livability” of Buckeye. A livable community is a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts from National Research Center at Polco. Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector, community-based organizations and residents, all geographically connected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions considering ten central facets of a community: • Economy • Mobility • Community Design • Utilities • Safety • Natural Environment • Parks and Recreation • Health and Wellness • Education, Arts, and Culture • Inclusivity and Engagement The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 592 residents of the City of Buckeye collected from November 6, 2023 to December 18, 2023. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 4% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2023 survey was 12%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Buckeye. 1 How the results are reported For the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Comparisons to benchmarks NRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 500 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. In each tab, Buckeye's results are noted as being “higher” than the benchmark, “lower” than the benchmark, or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Buckeye residents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as “higher” or “lower” than the benchmark means that Buckeye's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was “much higher” or “much lower,” then Buckeye's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark. The survey was administered after the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of challenge for many local governments. While we provide comparisons to national benchmarks, it is important to note that much of the benchmark data was collected prior to or during the pandemic. This may impact how your City's 2023 ratings compare to other communities’ ratings from the past five years. Trends over time Trend data for Buckeye represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines.¹ Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than seven percentage points between the 2022 and 2023 surveys, the change is statistically significant. 1. In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 2 Conducting the survey The 5,000 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on November 6, 2023 and data collection for the survey remained open for six weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. The final mailing was a reiminder postcard inviting the household one final time to participate in the survey. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online, as well as QR codes to further encourage participation. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so, and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again. About x% of the 5,000 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining xxxx households that received the invitations to participate, 592 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 12%. The response rate was calculated using AAPOR’s response rate #2 for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.² It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying “confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinions are relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Buckeye survey is no greater than plus or minus four percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (592 completed surveys). In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open-participation survey was publicized by the City of Buckeye. The open-participation survey was identical to the random sample survey, with two small updates; it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Buckeye and also a question about where they heard about the survey. The open-participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on December 15, 2023 The survey remained open for two weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open-participation respondents. Methods Selecting survey recipients All households within the City of Buckeye were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Buckeye was purchased from Polco's mailing vendor, Go-Dog Direct, based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Buckeye households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Buckeye boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey. Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of six voting districts. From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with a unit number) sampled at a rate of 5:3 compared to single family housing units. An individual within each household was randomly selected using the "birthday method". The birthday method selects a person within the household by asking the “person who most recently had a birthday” to complete the questionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the introduction of the survey. 3 Unweighted Weighted Target ⁴ Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Area District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 Hispanic origin No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish or.. Yes, I consider myself to be of Hispanic, Lati.. Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Man Woman 32% 38% 31% 33% 39% 28% 71% 22% 7% 20% 17% 25% 16% 10% 11% 21% 16% 25% 16% 10% 11% 25% 15% 32% 12% 8% 9% 38% 62% 38% 62% 15% 85% 15% 85% 15% 85% 6% 94% 94% 6% 96% 4% 96% 4% 50% 50% 51% 49% 40% 60% 46% 54% 49% 51% 48% 52% Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Buckeye. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.³ The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. 4 The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Buckeye funded this research. Please contact Daniel Bronis of the City of Buckeye at dbronis@buckeyeaz.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Study Limitations All public opinion research is subject to unmeasured error. While the methodologies employed for this survey were designed to minimize this error as much as possible, these other sources of potential error should be acknowledged, and can include non-response error, coverage error, recall bias and social desirability bias. Non-response error arises when those who were selected to participate in the survey did not do so, and may have different opinions or experiences that survey responders. For general resident surveys, where the results are meant to be generalized to the entire adult population living in households, the mailing lists based on the Delivery Sequence File from the United States Post Office may exclude certain types of housing units, such as those in multi-family buildings where mail is addressed to a named resident at the address rather than to a specific unit or where residents only receive their mail at a post office box and the geographic location of a residence cannot be determined, there may be a coverage error, although for most locations, this is minimal. Respondents may not perfectly remember their experiences in the past year (such as participation in social or civic events), and for some survey items they may answer in ways they think cast their responses in a more favorable light (recall bias and social desirability bias). Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali 2. See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/ 3. Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from https://surveyinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Full-anesrake-paper.pdf 4. Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey Sex/age Man 18-34 Man 35-54 Man 55+ Woman 18-34 Woman 35-54 Woman 55+ 16% 16% 14% 15% 21% 17% 17% 17% 15% 16% 22% 13% 30% 14% 4% 41% 9% 2% 5 Key Findings Residents generally feel safe in Buckeye but continue to prioritize safety in the community. Ratings for safety in Buckeye remained stable from the previous iteration in 2022, however, safety was rated as the top priority for the city to focus on in the coming two years. Roughly 9 in 10 residents reported feelings of very or somewhat safe in their neighborhood during the day, and from fire, flood, or other natural disaster. About 8 in 10 reported similar feelings of safety from violent crime, while around three-quarters felt safe from property crime, and in Buckeye’s downtown/commercial area during the day. Safety-related services remained consistent with the previous survey, with all items scoring on par with national comparisons. More than 8 in 10 residents gave high marks to fire services, while about three-quarters provided excellent or good ratings to police services and ambulance or emergency medical services. Roughly two-thirds positively reviewed crime prevention, and fire prevention and education. While there have been small gains in the local economy, it remains an area of opportunity. Many items related to the economy saw increases from the previous year, however, the national comparisons indicate that economy is still an important focus area for Buckeye. About 6 in 10 residents gave high marks to the overall economic health, consistent with the previous iterations and national comparisons. Both economic development (52%) and cost of living (39%) remained stable from the previous iteration and were on par with national averages. While ratings for the overall quality of business and service establishments (47%), variety of business and service establishments (38%), vibrancy of downtown/commercial area (31%), and shopping opportunities (29%) were below the national averages, each increased by at least 10 percentage points from the previous survey. Roughly 4 in 10 residents gave high marks to Buckeye as a place to work, and as a place to visit, scoring below national comparisons but staying consistent with the previous year. Residents identify opportunities for improvement within the City’s health and wellness. About half of respondents gave excellent or good ratings to the overall health and wellness opportunities in Buckeye, while around 8 in 10 provided essential or very important ratings for the city to focus on in the coming two years. Roughly 7 in 10 respondents reported positive scores for their overall health, on par with national comparisons. However, just 4 in 10 praised the health services within Buckeye, scoring below national averages. The availability of health and wellness options indicate a potential are of opportunity for the city, with the availability of affordable quality food (43%), affordable quality health care (35%) and mental health care (22%), and preventative health services (34%) all lagged behind national averages. Residents appreciate Buckeye’s natural environment and parks, but identify opportunities for improvement within the City’s recreational opportunities. Roughly two-thirds of respondents praised the overall quality of the natural environment, and cleanliness of Buckeye, both on par with national averages. A similar proportion gave high marks to recycling services, rising 10 percentage points from 2022. More than 5 in 10 respondents praised the preservation of natural areas, Buckeye open space, and yard waste pick up, on par with national comparisons. A similar proportion positively rated the air quality in Buckeye; however it ranked lower than the national average. Buckeye’s overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities received praise from about 7 in 10 residents, consistent with 2022’s evaluations and national benchmarks. Roughly two-thirds gave high marks to City parks, and recreation programs or classes, both increasing by at least seven percentage points. About 6 in 10 provided similar ratings for the recreation centers or facilities. While these aspects were on par with national averages, just half of residents offered positive review for fitness and recreational opportunities, and the availability of paths and walking trails, falling below national averages and indicating a potential area of opportunity. 6 Facets of livability Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. Quality-Importance Matrix To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of facets were compared to their ratings of the quality of these facets. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all facets were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some facets were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some facets were in the bottom half of both lists. 51% or more of respondents were considered of “higher quality” and those with ratings lower than 51% were considered to be of “lower quality.” Services were classified as “more important” if they were rated as essential or very important by 84% or more of respondents. Services were rated as “less important” if they received a rating of less than 84%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right-left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up-down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix (higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Importance 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Quality Parks and recreation Natural environment Mobility Inclusivity and engagement Health and wellness Education, arts, and culture Economy Community design Utilities Safety Median Median 7 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community 61% 59% Similar 61% 59% Similar 21% 25% Lower 21% 25% Lower 46% 41% Lower 46% 41% Lower 61% 52% Similar 61% 52% Similar 67% 66% Similar 67% 66% Similar 69% 66% Similar 69% 66% Similar 67% 69% Similar 67% 69% Similar 50% 50% Lower 50% 50% Lower 36% 34% Lower 36% 34% Lower 43% 44% Similar 43% 44% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) Quality and Importance by the Numbers The charts below show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the priority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher than communities across the country (the national benchmark). vs. benchmark⁵ 8 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community 91% 92% Similar 91% 92% Similar 83% 74% Similar 83% 74% Similar 91% 87% Higher 91% 87% Higher 81% 92% Similar 81% 92% Similar 89% 96% Similar 89% 96% Similar 88% 84% Similar 88% 84% Similar 89% 81% Similar 89% 81% Similar 86% 83% Similar 86% 83% Similar 85% 79% Similar 85% 79% Similar 76% 70% Similar 76% 70% Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. (% essential or very important) 5. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 9 Excellent 18% Good 56% Poor 3% Fair 23% The overall quality of life in Buckeye, 2023 Quality of Life Measuring community livability starts with assessing the quality of life of those who live there, and ensuring that the community is attractive, accessible, and welcoming to all. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Buckeye as a place to live The overall quality of life 78% 78% Similar 78% 78% Similar 65% 74% Similar 65% 74% Similar Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Recommend living in Buckeye to someone who asks Remain in Buckeye for the next five years 76% 80% Similar 76% 80% Similar 78% 82% Similar 78% 82% Similar Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. (% very or somewhat likely) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall image or reputation 52% 46% Lower 52% 46% Lower Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. (% excellent or good) 6. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark⁶ 10 Excellent 11% Good 46% Fair 25% Poor 18% Overall confidence in Buckeye government, 2023 Governance Strong local governments produce results that meet the needs of residents while making the best use of available resources, and are responsive to the present and future needs of the community as a whole. 2017 2019 2021 2023 The value of services for the taxes paid to Buckeye The overall direction that Buckeye is taking The job Buckeye government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Buckeye government Generally acting in the best interest of the community 46% 51% Similar 46% 51% Similar 50% 62% Similar 50% 62% Similar 58% 53% Similar 58% 53% Similar 51% 57% Similar 51% 57% Similar 49% 58% Similar 49% 58% Similar 56% 57% Similar 56% 57% Similar Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Public information services Overall customer service by Buckeye employees 53% 58% Similar 53% 58% Similar 57% 74% Similar 57% 74% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark⁷ 11 7. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect Similar Similar 52% 55% Similar 52% 55% Similar 56% 51% Similar 56% 51% Similar 58% 63% Similar 58% 63% Similar 61% 68% Similar 61% 68% Similar 2017 2019 2021 2023 The City of Buckeye The Federal Government 60% 68% Similar 60% 68% Similar 30% 30% Similar 30% 30% Similar Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good) 12 Excellent 10% Good 50% Fair 30% Poor 10% Overall economic health of Buckeye, 2023 Economy Local governments work together with private and nonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a thriving local economy. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Buckeye as a place to work Buckeye as a place to visit 43% 45% Lower 43% 45% Lower 31% 37% Much lower 31% 37% Much lower Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 e O s v t e a r b a li ll s h qu m a e li n t t y s of business and service 37% 47% Lower 37% 47% Lower Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Economic development 57% 52% Similar 57% 52% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall economic health 61% 59% Similar 61% 59% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark⁸ 13 Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living 26% 38% Lower 26% 38% Lower 14% 31% Lower 14% 31% Lower 33% 27% Lower 33% 27% Lower 19% 29% Lower 19% 29% Lower 38% 39% Similar 38% 39% Similar 2017 2019 2021 2023 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: 9% 27% Similar 9% 27% Similar What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (% very or somewhat positive) 8. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 14 Excellent 6% Good 20% Fair 34% Poor 40% Overall quality of the transportation system in Buckeye, 2023 Mobility The ease with which residents can move about their communities, whether for commuting, leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work, and play in the community. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of walking 31% 38% Similar 31% 38% Similar 53% 52% Similar 53% 52% Similar 50% 59% Similar 50% 59% Similar 13% 10% Much lower 13% 10% Much lower 27% 26% Lower 27% 26% Lower 39% 43% Lower 39% 43% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall quality of the transportation system 21% 25% Lower 21% 25% Lower Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark⁹ 15 9. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving 38% 46% Similar 38% 46% Similar 49% 41% Lower 49% 41% Lower Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services 44% 53% Similar 44% 53% Similar 50% 55% Similar 50% 55% Similar 44% 50% Similar 44% 50% Similar 61% 65% Similar 61% 65% Similar 57% 57% Similar 57% 57% Similar 59% 55% Similar 59% 55% Similar 21% 11% Much lower 21% 11% Much lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 16 Excellent 9% Good 33% Fair 33% Poor 25% Overall design or layout of Buckeye's residential and commercial areas, 2023 Community Design A well-designed community enhances the quality of life for its residents by encouraging smart land use and zoning, ensuring that affordable housing is accessible to all, and providing access to parks and other green spaces. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods 47% 44% Similar 47% 44% Similar 36% 33% Similar 36% 33% Similar 58% 59% Similar 58% 59% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Your neighborhood as a place to live 88% 83% Similar 88% 83% Similar Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas 46% 41% Lower 46% 41% Lower Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark¹⁰ 17 10. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance 44% 46% Similar 44% 46% Similar 29% 36% Lower 29% 36% Lower 50% 44% Similar 50% 44% Similar 40% 37% Similar 40% 37% Similar 45% 53% Similar 45% 53% Similar 51% 51% Lower 51% 51% Lower 2017 2019 2021 2023 Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement 35% 29% Similar 35% 29% Similar 47% 47% Similar 47% 47% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 18 Excellent 12% Good 40% Fair 36% Poor 12% Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Buckeye, 2023 Utilities Services such as water, gas, electricity, and internet access play a vital role in ensuring the physical and economic health and well-being of the communities they serve. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing 43% 46% Similar 43% 46% Similar 71% 84% Similar 71% 84% Similar 45% 52% Lower 45% 52% Lower 62% 77% Similar 62% 77% Similar 58% 70% Similar 58% 70% Similar 70% 70% Similar 70% 70% Similar 51% 62% Similar 51% 62% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure 61% 52% Similar 61% 52% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark¹¹ 11. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 19 Excellent 23% Good 44% Fair 27% Poor 6% Overall feeling of safety in Buckeye, 2023 Safety Public safety is often the most important task facing local governments. All residents should feel safe and secure in their neighborhoods and in the greater community, and providing robust safety-related services is essential to residents' quality of life. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall feeling of safety 67% 66% Similar 67% 66% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 In your neighborhood during the day In Buckeye's downtown/commercial area during the day From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster 92% 91% Similar 92% 91% Similar 73% 75% Lower 73% 75% Lower 75% 73% Similar 75% 73% Similar 82% 81% Similar 82% 81% Similar 86% 88% Similar 86% 88% Similar Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: (% very or somewhat safe) vs. benchmark¹² 20 2017 2019 2021 2023 Police services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness 71% 77% Similar 71% 77% Similar 69% 69% Similar 69% 69% Similar 58% 60% Similar 58% 60% Similar 77% 78% Similar 77% 78% Similar 81% 87% Similar 81% 87% Similar 64% 67% Similar 64% 67% Similar 49% 52% Similar 49% 52% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 12. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 21 Excellent 24% Good 42% Fair 24% Poor 10% Overall quality of natural environment in Buckeye, 2023 Natural Environment The natural environment plays a vital role in the health and well-being of residents. The natural spaces in which residents live and experience their communities has a direct and profound effect on quality of life. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Cleanliness Air quality 60% 64% Similar 60% 64% Similar 48% 55% Lower 48% 55% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Preservation of natural areas 49% 55% Similar 49% 55% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall quality of natural environment 69% 66% Similar 69% 66% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark¹³ 22 Buckeye open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up 52% 56% Similar 52% 56% Similar 57% 67% Similar 57% 67% Similar 57% 62% Similar 57% 62% Similar 13. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 23 Excellent 24% Good 46% Fair 20% Poor 10% Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities, 2023 Parks and Recreation "There are no communities that pride themselves on their quality of life, promote themselves as a desirable location for businesses to relocate, or maintain that they are environmental stewards of their natural resources, without such communities having a robust, active system of parks and recreation programs for public use and enjoyment." - National Recreation and Park Association 2017 2019 2021 2023 Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities 54% 53% Lower 54% 53% Lower 56% 54% Lower 56% 54% Lower 53% 54% Lower 53% 54% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 City parks 61% 68% Similar 61% 68% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities 67% 69% Similar 67% 69% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark¹⁴ 24 Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities 55% 64% Similar 55% 64% Similar 52% 57% Similar 52% 57% Similar 14. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 25 Excellent 12% Good 38% Fair 34% Poor 15% Overall health and wellness opportunities in Buckeye, 2023 Health and Wellness The characteristics of and amenities available in the communities in which people live has a direct impact on the health and wellness of residents, and thus, on their quality of life overall. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care 38% 43% Lower 38% 43% Lower 32% 35% Lower 32% 35% Lower 33% 34% Lower 33% 34% Lower 24% 22% Lower 24% 22% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall health and wellness opportunities 50% 50% Lower 50% 50% Lower Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark¹⁵ 26 2017 2019 2021 2023 Health services 42% 43% Lower 42% 43% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Please rate your overall health. 68% 70% Similar 68% 70% Similar Please rate your overall health. (% excellent or very good) 15. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 27 Excellent 8% Good 27% Fair 37% Poor 28% Overall opportunities for education, culture and the arts, 2023 Education, Arts, and Culture Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and in cultural activities is linked to increased civic engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced enjoyment of the local community. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool K-12 education Adult educational opportunities Opportunities to attend special events and festivals 26% 28% Lower 26% 28% Lower 26% 30% Lower 26% 30% Lower 32% 24% Lower 32% 24% Lower 51% 45% Lower 51% 45% Lower 43% 34% Lower 43% 34% Lower 48% 51% Similar 48% 51% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Public library services 67% 74% Similar 67% 74% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts 36% 34% Lower 36% 34% Lower Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) 10. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁶ 28 Excellent 11% Good 33% Fair 36% Poor 19% Residents' connection and engagement with their community, 2023 Inclusivity and Engagement Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to participate within their communities feel more included, involved, and engaged than those who do not. 2017 2019 2021 2023 Buckeye as a place to raise children Buckeye as a place to retire Sense of community 69% 69% Lower 69% 69% Lower 67% 71% Similar 67% 71% Similar 56% 57% Similar 56% 57% Similar Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Residents' connection and engagement with their community 43% 44% Similar 43% 44% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. (% excellent or good) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Making all residents feel welcome 69% 60% Similar 69% 60% Similar Please rate the job you feel the Buckeye community does at each of the following. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark¹⁷ 29 Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents 51% 62% Similar 51% 62% Similar 59% 60% Similar 59% 60% Similar 45% 46% Similar 45% 46% Similar 2017 2019 2021 2023 Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 42% 49% Similar 42% 49% Similar 52% 50% Similar 52% 50% Similar 47% 50% Similar 47% 50% Similar 60% 47% Lower 60% 47% Lower 60% 47% Similar 60% 47% Similar 50% 56% Similar 50% 56% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. (% excellent or good) 17. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 30 Residents' Participation Levels 2017 2019 2021 2023 Attended a local public meeting Watched a local public meeting Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate 22% 24% Similar 22% 24% Similar 26% 14% Lower 26% 14% Lower 15% 7% Lower 15% 7% Lower Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) 2017 2019 2021 2023 Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online 94% 94% Similar 94% 94% Similar 97% 94% Similar 97% 94% Similar 81% 82% Similar 81% 82% Similar 96% 97% Similar 96% 97% Similar 38% 36% Similar 38% 36% Similar 70% 68% Higher 70% 68% Higher In general, how many times do you: (% a few times a week or more) 18. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁸ 31 % positive Rank Number of communities Percentile Quality of Life Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to live Similar The overall quality of life Similar Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Buckeye to someone who asks Similar Remain in Buckeye for the next five years Similar Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Overall image or reputation Lower Governance Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Public information services Similar Overall customer service by Buckeye employees Similar Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Buckeye Similar The overall direction that Buckeye is taking Similar The job Buckeye government does at welcoming resident involvement Similar Overall confidence in Buckeye government Similar Generally acting in the best interest of the community Similar Being honest Similar Being open and transparent to the public Similar Informing residents about issues facing the community Similar Treating all residents fairly Similar Treating residents with respect Similar 19 376 294 78% 29 392 269 74% 32 324 219 80% 41 322 189 82% 17 370 297 46% 34 324 212 58% 39 372 219 74% 46 377 198 51% 58 352 145 62% 55 344 152 53% 51 316 153 57% 50 320 158 58% 50 311 154 57% 51 265 129 55% 47 269 142 51% 56 317 139 63% 48 262 136 68% National Benchmark Tables This table contains the comparisons of Buckeye's results to those from other communities. The first column shows the comparison of Buckeye's rating to the benchmark. Buckeye's results are noted as being “higher”, “lower” or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Buckeye residents is statistically similar to or different than the benchmark. The second column is Buckeye's “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good). The third column is the rank assigned to Buckeye's rating among communities where a similar question was asked. The fourth column is the number of communities that asked a similar question. The fifth column shows the percentile for Buckeye's result -- that is what percent of surveyed communities had a lower rating than Buckeye. 32 Governance Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Buckeye Similar The Federal Government Similar Economy Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to work Lower Buckeye as a place to visit Much lower Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall economic health Similar Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Lower Variety of business and service establishments Lower Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Lower Employment opportunities Lower Shopping opportunities Lower Cost of living Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Economic development Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Overall economic health Similar What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Similar Mobility Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of the transportation system Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Traffic flow on major streets Similar Ease of public parking Similar Ease of travel by car Similar Ease of travel by public transportation Much lower Ease of travel by bicycle Lower Ease of walking Lower Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 th Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Similar 36 371 231 68% 9 304 275 30% 15 370 302 45% 8 329 298 37% 35 323 209 59% 8 323 295 47% 11 260 231 38% 13 302 262 31% 14 336 286 27% 15 326 275 29% 63 313 114 39% 48 318 165 52% 93 297 21 92% 73 306 82 27% 3 268 258 25% 25 344 250 38% 37 302 190 52% 22 334 258 59% 6 306 284 10% 8 334 302 26% 13 338 289 43% 60 305 122 46% 33 Mobility Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Walked or biked instead of driving Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Traffic enforcement Similar Traffic signal timing Similar Street repair Similar Street cleaning Similar Street lighting Similar Sidewalk maintenance Similar Bus or transit services Much lower Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Overall quality of the transportation system Similar Community Design Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Your neighborhood as a place to live Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Well-planned residential growth Similar Well-planned commercial growth Similar Well-designed neighborhoods Similar Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Similar Public places where people want to spend time Lower Variety of housing options Similar Availability of affordable quality housing Similar Overall quality of new development Similar Overall appearance Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Land use, planning and zoning Similar Code enforcement Similar 12 307 270 41% 28 365 254 53% 56 316 137 55% 61 357 139 50% 54 327 147 65% 35 355 222 57% 51 327 158 55% 8 295 270 11% 65 258 90 74% 44 330 183 83% 6 314 294 41% 47 262 137 44% 29 261 185 33% 56 262 113 59% 19 258 209 46% 8 308 283 36% 51 321 155 44% 70 343 100 37% 56 332 146 53% 23 346 259 51% 20 327 257 29% 51 357 169 47% 34 Community Design Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Higher Utilities Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Affordable high-speed internet access Similar Garbage collection Similar Drinking water Lower Sewer services Similar Storm water management Similar Power (electric and/or gas) utility Similar Utility billing Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar Safety Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall feeling of safety Similar Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Similar In Buckeye's downtown/commercial area during the day Lower From property crime Similar From violent crime Similar From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Police services Similar Crime prevention Similar Animal control Similar Ambulance or emergency medical services Similar Fire services Similar Fire prevention and education Similar 94 297 16 87% 23 259 199 52% 28 256 185 46% 75 337 82 84% 8 325 294 52% 37 322 200 77% 48 337 172 70% 29 280 199 70% 27 301 218 62% 86 258 36 92% 31 362 243 66% 33 341 224 91% 11 329 291 75% 34 270 176 73% 38 270 166 81% 67 260 85 88% 42 389 218 77% 43 366 199 69% 32 338 222 60% 24 334 245 78% 32 353 232 87% 22 322 246 67% 35 Safety Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Emergency preparedness Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Overall feeling of safety Similar Natural environment Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of natural environment Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Cleanliness Similar Air quality Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Preservation of natural areas Similar Buckeye open space Similar Recycling Similar Yard waste pick-up Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Overall quality of natural environment Similar Parks and Recreation Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Availability of paths and walking trails Lower Fitness opportunities Lower Recreational opportunities Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. City parks Similar Recreation programs or classes Similar Recreation centers or facilities Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Similar Health and wellness Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall health and wellness opportunities Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Availability of affordable quality food Lower Availability of affordable quality health care Lower Availability of preventive health services Lower 22 323 247 52% 90 297 28 96% 22 323 249 66% 31 337 231 64% 8 310 284 55% 23 308 235 55% 41 306 179 56% 44 341 186 67% 34 303 197 62% 57 297 127 84% 24 265 200 69% 22 338 257 53% 19 310 251 54% 17 328 271 54% 24 334 252 68% 35 331 210 64% 22 318 246 57% 74 259 67 81% 13 316 272 50% 9 308 281 43% 11 315 281 35% 8 302 278 34% 36 Health and wellness Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Availability of affordable quality mental health care Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Health services Lower Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Overall health and wellness opportunities Similar Please rate your overall health. Similar Education, Arts and Culture Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Lower Community support for the arts Lower Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Lower K-12 education Lower Adult educational opportunities Lower Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Public library services Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Similar Inclusivity and Engagement Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to raise children Lower Buckeye as a place to retire Similar Sense of community Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar Please rate the job you feel the Buckeye community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Similar Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Similar Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Similar Taking care of vulnerable residents Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Sense of civic/community pride Similar 10 306 276 22% 12 298 259 43% 91 297 25 83% 52 303 144 70% 7 319 296 34% 8 324 297 28% 8 258 237 30% 8 316 290 24% 11 319 281 45% 17 309 256 34% 17 314 259 51% 18 333 270 74% 81 297 55 79% 22 380 286 69% 66 375 122 71% 35 341 216 57% 25 262 196 44% 32 264 180 60% 58 261 109 62% 41 262 154 60% 37 258 163 46% 27 258 188 49% 37 Inclusivity and Engagement Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Neighborliness of residents Similar Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Similar Opportunities to volunteer Lower Opportunities to participate in community matters Similar Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the comi.. Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar Participation Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Buckeye for help or information Similar Contacted Buckeye elected officials to express your opinion Similar Attended a local public meeting Similar Watched a local public meeting Lower Volunteered your time to some group/activity Similar Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Lower Voted in your most recent local election Lower In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Similar Access the internet from your cell phone Similar Visit social media sites Similar Use or check email Similar Share your opinions online Similar Shop online Higher 23 309 238 50% 21 319 251 50% 7 314 289 47% 13 314 273 47% 36 332 212 56% 48 297 153 70% 75 336 84 52% 42 307 179 15% 75 310 76 24% 10 299 269 14% 35 313 202 28% 3 303 293 7% 8 258 238 61% 45 257 141 94% 54 259 119 94% 76 259 62 82% 54 260 120 97% 90 258 25 36% 91 257 24 68% 38 2022 2023 Quality of Life Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to live The overall quality of life Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Buckeye to someone who asks Remain in Buckeye for the next five years Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Overall image or reputation Governance Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Public information services Overall customer service by Buckeye employees Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Buckeye The overall direction that Buckeye is taking The job Buckeye government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Buckeye government 74% 78% 65% 78% 82% 80% 78% 76% 46% 52% 74% 58% 57% 53% 57% 53% 62% 51% 51% 58% 50% 46% Full Trends This table contains the trends over time for the City of Buckeye. The combined "percent positive" responses for each survey year are presented (e.g., excellent/good or yes). If an item was not included during an administration of the survey, no percentage will be shown in the table. If the difference between the 2022 and 2023 surveys is greater than seven percentage points, the change is statistically significant. It is important to note that in 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 39 Governance Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. Generally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Buckeye The Federal Government Economy Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to work Buckeye as a place to visit Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall economic health Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments 68% 63% 51% 55% 57% 58% 61% 58% 56% 52% 56% 49% 30% 68% 30% 60% 37% 45% 31% 43% 59% 61% 38% 47% 26% 37% 40 Economy Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Economic development Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Mobility Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of the transportation system Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle 39% 29% 27% 31% 38% 19% 33% 14% 52% 57% 92% 91% 27% 9% 25% 21% 26% 10% 59% 52% 38% 27% 13% 50% 53% 31% 41 Mobility Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Ease of walking Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of the transportation system Community Design Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Your neighborhood as a place to live Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas 43% 39% 41% 46% 49% 38% 11% 55% 57% 65% 50% 55% 53% 21% 59% 57% 61% 44% 50% 44% 74% 83% 83% 88% 41% 46% 42 Community Design Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Utilities Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of the utility infrastructure 51% 53% 37% 44% 36% 46% 59% 33% 44% 51% 45% 40% 50% 29% 44% 58% 36% 47% 47% 29% 47% 35% 87% 91% 52% 61% 43 Utilities Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Safety Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall feeling of safety Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day In Buckeye's downtown/commercial area during the day From property crime From violent crime 62% 70% 70% 77% 52% 84% 46% 51% 70% 58% 62% 45% 71% 43% 92% 81% 66% 67% 81% 73% 75% 91% 82% 75% 73% 92% 44 Safety Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Police services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall feeling of safety Natural environment Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of natural environment Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Cleanliness Air quality Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Preservation of natural areas 88% 86% 52% 67% 87% 78% 60% 69% 77% 49% 64% 81% 77% 58% 69% 71% 96% 89% 66% 69% 55% 64% 48% 60% 55% 49% 45 Natural environment Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Buckeye open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of natural environment Parks and Recreation Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Health and wellness Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall health and wellness opportunities 62% 67% 56% 57% 57% 52% 84% 88% 69% 67% 54% 54% 53% 53% 56% 54% 57% 64% 68% 52% 55% 61% 81% 89% 50% 50% 46 Health and wellness Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Health services Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall health and wellness opportunities Please rate your overall health. Education, Arts and Culture Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool K-12 education Adult educational opportunities 22% 34% 35% 43% 24% 33% 32% 38% 43% 42% 83% 86% 70% 68% 34% 36% 34% 45% 24% 30% 28% 43% 51% 32% 26% 26% 47 Education, Arts and Culture Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Public library services Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Inclusivity and Engagement Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to raise children Buckeye as a place to retire Sense of community Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Residents' connection and engagement with their community Please rate the job you feel the Buckeye community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents 51% 48% 74% 67% 79% 85% 57% 71% 69% 56% 67% 69% 44% 43% 46% 60% 62% 60% 45% 59% 51% 69% 50% 49% 52% 42% 48 Inclusivity and Engagement Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Residents' connection and engagement with their community Participation Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Buckeye for help or information Contacted Buckeye elected officials to express your opinion Attended a local public meeting Watched a local public meeting Volunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Voted in your most recent local election In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home 56% 47% 47% 50% 50% 60% 60% 47% 70% 76% 61% 7% 28% 14% 24% 15% 52% 66% 15% 22% 26% 22% 15% 58% 94% 94% 49 Participation In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online 68% 36% 97% 82% 94% 70% 38% 96% 81% 97% 50 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Your neighborhood as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Buckeye as a place to raise children Excellent Good Fair Poor Buckeye as a place to work Excellent Good Fair Poor Buckeye as a place to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Buckeye as a place to retire Excellent Good 6% N=36 16% N=94 58% N=334 20% N=115 4% N=23 13% N=75 41% N=244 42% N=247 9% N=39 22% N=103 52% N=237 17% N=80 21% N=79 34% N=126 30% N=113 15% N=56 28% N=153 35% N=192 28% N=152 10% N=53 40% N=204 31% N=158 Complete Set of Frequencies This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. In some tables, the percentages may not sum to 100%; this is either because the question permitted the respondent to "choose all that apply", or for a question that asked the respondent to select one answer, it is due to the customary practice of rounding values to the nearest whole number. 51 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to retire Fair Poor The overall quality of life Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall economic health Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the transportation system Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Excellent Good 8% N=41 21% N=109 3% N=16 23% N=131 56% N=324 18% N=107 12% N=71 30% N=173 38% N=215 20% N=113 10% N=55 30% N=160 50% N=261 10% N=51 40% N=217 34% N=183 20% N=108 6% N=30 25% N=145 33% N=192 33% N=189 9% N=51 40% N=230 12% N=71 52 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Fair Poor Overall feeling of safety Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of natural environment Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall health and wellness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their community Excellent Good 12% N=68 36% N=207 6% N=37 27% N=158 44% N=256 23% N=131 10% N=56 24% N=135 42% N=236 24% N=137 10% N=57 20% N=107 46% N=250 24% N=129 15% N=78 34% N=176 38% N=198 12% N=64 28% N=141 37% N=187 27% N=138 8% N=38 33% N=176 11% N=60 53 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Residents' connection and engagement with their community Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Buckeye to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Remain in Buckeye for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe In Buckeye's downtown/commercial area during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe 19% N=101 36% N=190 8% N=44 12% N=70 45% N=262 35% N=200 11% N=61 7% N=38 28% N=157 54% N=302 1% N=6 4% N=25 3% N=19 23% N=133 69% N=403 2% N=9 13% N=60 11% N=51 41% N=195 34% N=162 9% N=49 12% N=69 46% N=266 27% N=154 54 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: From property crime Very unsafe From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Please rate the job you feel the Buckeye community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Excellent Good Fair Poor Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Taking care of vulnerable residents Excellent 6% N=37 3% N=14 8% N=43 9% N=52 34% N=190 47% N=266 2% N=11 1% N=8 9% N=52 37% N=213 51% N=293 7% N=37 32% N=175 41% N=222 19% N=105 10% N=52 27% N=133 45% N=221 18% N=86 12% N=58 28% N=131 41% N=195 20% N=94 15% N=55 55 Please rate the job you feel the Buckeye community does at each of the following. Taking care of vulnerable residents Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Excellent Good Fair Poor Employment opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Shopping opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Cost of living Excellent 18% N=67 36% N=134 32% N=119 18% N=101 35% N=196 37% N=211 10% N=59 30% N=167 32% N=182 31% N=175 7% N=40 33% N=163 36% N=180 24% N=121 6% N=31 35% N=149 37% N=159 22% N=94 6% N=24 39% N=216 32% N=182 23% N=127 6% N=36 9% N=51 56 Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Cost of living Good Fair Poor Overall image or reputation Excellent Good Fair Poor Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Traffic flow on major streets Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of public parking Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by car Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by public transportation Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by bicycle Excellent 16% N=92 45% N=261 30% N=176 14% N=82 39% N=224 37% N=211 10% N=55 28% N=158 33% N=190 31% N=176 8% N=45 15% N=78 33% N=171 38% N=197 14% N=75 15% N=82 27% N=151 41% N=229 18% N=103 70% N=223 20% N=63 6% N=20 4% N=13 7% N=26 57 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Ease of travel by bicycle Good Fair Poor Ease of walking Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned commercial growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Public places where people want to spend time Excellent 39% N=145 34% N=124 20% N=75 25% N=115 32% N=148 30% N=141 13% N=62 23% N=127 33% N=178 32% N=173 12% N=67 32% N=169 35% N=182 24% N=124 9% N=49 12% N=67 29% N=160 44% N=245 15% N=86 11% N=47 42% N=174 34% N=141 12% N=48 8% N=42 58 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Public places where people want to spend time Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of new development Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall appearance Excellent Good Fair Poor Cleanliness Excellent Good Fair Poor Air quality Excellent 28% N=146 35% N=180 28% N=146 21% N=110 35% N=184 33% N=175 11% N=61 25% N=123 38% N=184 28% N=136 10% N=47 15% N=84 31% N=171 39% N=212 15% N=80 11% N=59 38% N=214 39% N=218 12% N=69 7% N=40 29% N=163 47% N=268 17% N=97 15% N=86 59 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Air quality Good Fair Poor Availability of paths and walking trails Excellent Good Fair Poor Fitness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality food Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of preventive health services Excellent 15% N=85 30% N=167 40% N=225 19% N=99 28% N=143 30% N=158 23% N=117 15% N=75 31% N=157 36% N=182 18% N=92 19% N=96 27% N=140 40% N=207 15% N=75 28% N=159 28% N=161 33% N=185 11% N=60 26% N=129 39% N=193 27% N=132 8% N=39 9% N=42 60 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Availability of preventive health services Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality mental health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Community support for the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Excellent Good Fair Poor K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor Adult educational opportunities Excellent 28% N=132 38% N=182 25% N=119 49% N=150 30% N=92 14% N=43 8% N=25 37% N=180 34% N=167 20% N=98 8% N=39 34% N=137 36% N=144 22% N=89 9% N=35 50% N=123 26% N=65 17% N=43 7% N=17 25% N=84 30% N=103 35% N=119 10% N=33 11% N=33 61 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Adult educational opportunities Good Fair Poor Sense of civic/community pride Excellent Good Fair Poor Neighborliness of residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent 28% N=86 38% N=116 23% N=72 15% N=69 36% N=164 36% N=164 14% N=63 12% N=65 38% N=203 35% N=187 16% N=86 18% N=90 32% N=158 35% N=176 14% N=72 17% N=84 32% N=163 37% N=186 15% N=76 15% N=55 37% N=137 33% N=121 14% N=52 14% N=59 62 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Opportunities to participate in community matters Good Fair Poor Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Buckeye for help or information No Yes Contacted Buckeye elected officials to express your opinion No Yes Attended a local public meeting No Yes Watched a local public meeting No Yes Volunteered your time to some group/activity No Yes Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate No Yes Voted in your most recent local election No Yes Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone No Yes Walked or biked instead of driving No 19% N=78 34% N=145 33% N=140 15% N=67 29% N=133 41% N=186 15% N=67 53% N=303 47% N=272 15% N=84 85% N=495 24% N=136 76% N=430 14% N=79 86% N=503 28% N=161 72% N=421 7% N=43 93% N=541 61% N=355 39% N=224 46% N=271 54% N=313 59% N=342 63 Walked or biked instead of driving Yes Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Public information services Excellent Good Fair Poor Economic development Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic signal timing Excellent Good Fair Poor Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair 41% N=241 5% N=27 36% N=178 44% N=218 14% N=67 15% N=76 33% N=169 39% N=199 13% N=67 18% N=101 28% N=156 41% N=226 13% N=69 13% N=73 32% N=174 44% N=241 11% N=61 18% N=103 32% N=183 37% N=214 13% N=75 27% N=152 45% N=253 21% N=115 64 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Street cleaning Poor Street lighting Excellent Good Fair Poor Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor Bus or transit services Excellent Good Fair Poor Land use, planning and zoning Excellent Good Fair Poor Code enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Affordable high-speed internet access Excellent Good Fair 8% N=42 15% N=88 28% N=160 42% N=243 15% N=84 11% N=61 33% N=178 42% N=226 14% N=75 63% N=194 25% N=76 7% N=21 5% N=14 28% N=126 42% N=189 23% N=103 7% N=30 20% N=91 33% N=146 39% N=173 9% N=38 27% N=153 32% N=178 14% N=77 65 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Affordable high-speed internet access Poor Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Poor Drinking water Excellent Good Fair Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair Poor Storm water management Excellent Good Fair Poor Power (electric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent Good Fair 27% N=151 1% N=7 15% N=86 40% N=235 44% N=257 27% N=150 21% N=116 39% N=217 13% N=70 4% N=23 19% N=107 52% N=287 25% N=135 8% N=43 22% N=118 46% N=244 24% N=127 8% N=45 22% N=126 46% N=260 24% N=136 25% N=140 43% N=245 19% N=105 66 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Utility billing Poor Police services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair Poor Animal control Excellent Good Fair Poor Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire prevention and education Excellent Good Fair 13% N=76 5% N=29 18% N=94 46% N=249 31% N=164 10% N=51 21% N=106 46% N=234 24% N=122 11% N=46 28% N=119 39% N=164 21% N=90 6% N=22 16% N=64 41% N=162 37% N=149 2% N=9 11% N=49 45% N=205 42% N=193 27% N=95 40% N=143 27% N=97 67 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Fire prevention and education Poor Emergency preparedness Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of natural areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Buckeye open space Excellent Good Fair Poor Recycling Excellent Good Fair Poor Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair 6% N=22 16% N=46 32% N=93 33% N=95 19% N=56 18% N=82 27% N=123 42% N=195 13% N=61 13% N=63 31% N=150 36% N=174 21% N=101 8% N=44 25% N=139 42% N=229 25% N=138 10% N=47 29% N=141 36% N=174 26% N=127 27% N=134 44% N=220 25% N=124 68 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. City parks Poor Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilities Excellent Good Fair Poor Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Public library services Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Buckeye employees Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Buckeye Excellent Good Fair 5% N=26 9% N=39 27% N=113 44% N=188 20% N=83 18% N=72 24% N=97 41% N=165 16% N=66 18% N=74 39% N=158 31% N=127 12% N=49 4% N=18 22% N=102 41% N=190 33% N=153 5% N=25 21% N=105 45% N=224 29% N=146 33% N=177 41% N=218 10% N=53 69 Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Buckeye Poor The overall direction that Buckeye is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor The job Buckeye government does at welcoming resident involvement Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall confidence in Buckeye government Excellent Good Fair Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Being honest Excellent Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the public Excellent Good Fair 16% N=84 15% N=84 22% N=123 47% N=259 15% N=83 14% N=59 32% N=139 42% N=179 12% N=52 18% N=89 25% N=127 46% N=231 11% N=53 16% N=82 26% N=139 47% N=246 11% N=58 15% N=62 28% N=117 42% N=176 15% N=65 25% N=115 41% N=187 14% N=65 70 Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. Being open and transparent to the public Poor Informing residents about issues facing the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating all residents fairly Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor The Federal Government Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Essential Very important Somewhat important 19% N=87 21% N=102 28% N=140 39% N=194 12% N=59 15% N=62 21% N=88 48% N=196 16% N=65 13% N=58 20% N=90 49% N=224 19% N=87 12% N=66 20% N=109 50% N=282 18% N=101 39% N=202 31% N=161 24% N=124 5% N=28 7% N=43 38% N=217 55% N=313 71 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of the transportation system Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall feeling of safety Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall quality of natural environment Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall health and wellness opportunities Essential 2% N=11 24% N=138 39% N=222 35% N=202 0% N=1 13% N=73 39% N=225 49% N=282 1% N=5 8% N=44 31% N=183 60% N=348 4% N=24 32% N=186 63% N=366 1% N=8 15% N=90 44% N=254 40% N=232 0% N=2 19% N=110 44% N=256 36% N=210 41% N=240 72 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall health and wellness opportunities Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Residents' connection and engagement with their community Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Visit social media sites Several times a day Once a day A few times a week 2% N=12 15% N=85 42% N=246 1% N=7 20% N=117 43% N=248 35% N=203 4% N=26 26% N=152 45% N=260 25% N=145 2% N=11 4% N=22 11% N=60 10% N=55 74% N=422 3% N=19 2% N=14 4% N=24 8% N=45 82% N=471 12% N=67 15% N=85 55% N=317 73 In general, how many times do you: Visit social media sites Every few weeks Less often or never Use or check email Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Share your opinions online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Shop online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Please rate your overall health. Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive 16% N=91 2% N=13 1% N=6 2% N=11 8% N=46 14% N=81 75% N=432 48% N=272 16% N=88 18% N=101 4% N=23 14% N=79 7% N=39 25% N=140 38% N=212 12% N=70 18% N=104 1% N=8 5% N=31 23% N=134 44% N=254 26% N=148 18% N=104 9% N=49 74 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative How many years have you lived in Buckeye? Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years Which best describes the building you live in? Single-family detached home Townhouse or duplex (may share walls but no units above or below you) Condominium or apartment (have units above or below you) Mobile home Other Do you rent or own your home? Rent Own About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? Less than $300 $300 to $599 $600 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $2,499 $2,500 to $3,999 $4,000 to $6,999 $7,000 to $9,999 Do any children 17 or under live in your household? No 9% N=50 28% N=164 36% N=208 5% N=30 22% N=128 20% N=115 34% N=201 19% N=111 2% N=11 0% N=3 2% N=10 2% N=10 94% N=550 85% N=497 15% N=86 1% N=7 1% N=7 22% N=124 36% N=207 18% N=102 12% N=67 7% N=42 3% N=16 58% N=332 75 Do any children 17 or under live in your household? Yes Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 to $299,999 $300,000 or more Are you of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin? No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin Yes, I consider myself to be of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White A race not listed In which category is your age? 18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 42% N=245 33% N=190 67% N=390 2% N=9 2% N=11 16% N=88 29% N=157 16% N=87 25% N=139 8% N=44 3% N=15 38% N=216 62% N=352 12% N=65 68% N=380 19% N=105 3% N=17 1% N=7 1% N=5 10% N=58 23% N=134 16% N=91 25% N=143 4% N=22 76 In which category is your age? 65-74 years 75 years or older What is your gender? Woman Man Identify in another way If you identify in another way, how would you describe your gender? Agender/I don't identify with any gender Non-binary Identify in another way 8% N=45 15% N=86 2% N=11 50% N=282 48% N=269 47% N=5 47% N=5 7% N=1 77 Methods (Open Participation) As part of its participation in The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™), the City of Buckeye conducted a survey of 592 residents. Survey invitations were mailed to randomly selected households and data were collected from November 6, 2023 to December 18, 2023. The results from this main survey effort represent the most robust estimate of your residents’ opinions. After the above data collection period was underway, a link to an online open participation survey was publicized by the City of Buckeye. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two small updates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and also a question about where they heard about the survey. The open participation survey was open to all Buckeye residents and became available on December 4, 2023. The survey remained open for two weeks and there were 94 responses. The open participation survey data were not collected through a random sample and it is unknown who in the community was aware of the survey; therefore, a level of confidence in the representativeness of the sample cannot be estimated. Due to limited response, the results were not statistically weighted. 18. Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from https://surveyinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Full-anesrake-paper.pdf 19. Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey. 78 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Your neighborhood as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Buckeye as a place to raise children Excellent Good Fair 7% N=6 29% N=27 47% N=43 17% N=16 7% N=6 16% N=15 42% N=39 35% N=32 27% N=18 43% N=29 21% N=14 Open Participation Survey Results This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the open participation survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. In some tables, the percentages may not sum to 100%; this is either because the question permitted the respondent to "choose all that apply", or for a question that asked the respondent to select one answer, it is due to the customary practice of rounding values to the nearest whole number. 79 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Buckeye as a place to raise children Poor Buckeye as a place to work Excellent Good Fair Poor Buckeye as a place to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Buckeye as a place to retire Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall quality of life in Buckeye Excellent 9% N=6 30% N=17 36% N=20 23% N=13 11% N=6 35% N=31 33% N=29 25% N=22 7% N=6 12% N=10 20% N=17 41% N=35 27% N=23 10% N=9 80 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. The overall quality of life in Buckeye Good Fair Poor Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall economic health of Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair 12% N=11 24% N=22 54% N=50 18% N=17 32% N=29 35% N=32 15% N=14 12% N=10 33% N=27 48% N=40 7% N=6 33% N=27 12% N=10 2% N=2 81 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Buckeye Poor Overall design or layout of Buckeye's residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Buckeye (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall feeling of safety in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of natural environment in Buckeye Excellent 53% N=44 32% N=30 35% N=33 26% N=24 6% N=6 19% N=16 42% N=36 34% N=29 5% N=4 9% N=8 26% N=24 49% N=46 16% N=15 25% N=22 82 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall quality of natural environment in Buckeye Good Fair Poor Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall health and wellness opportunities in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Excellent Good Fair 10% N=9 20% N=18 45% N=40 18% N=16 25% N=22 36% N=32 20% N=18 28% N=25 26% N=23 35% N=31 11% N=10 38% N=33 19% N=17 2% N=2 83 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Buckeye to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Remain in Buckeye for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very safe 41% N=36 23% N=20 48% N=41 22% N=19 7% N=6 15% N=14 15% N=14 41% N=38 28% N=26 9% N=8 14% N=13 22% N=20 54% N=49 71% N=66 84 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe In Buckeye's downtown/commercial area during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe 2% N=2 2% N=2 8% N=7 17% N=16 3% N=2 10% N=8 9% N=7 35% N=28 43% N=34 7% N=6 17% N=16 10% N=9 39% N=36 27% N=25 85 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Please rate the job you feel the Buckeye community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Excellent Good Fair Poor Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent 3% N=3 8% N=7 17% N=15 30% N=27 42% N=37 6% N=6 13% N=12 33% N=31 47% N=44 22% N=19 23% N=20 36% N=31 19% N=16 26% N=19 86 Please rate the job you feel the Buckeye community does at each of the following. Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Good Fair Poor Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Overall quality of business and service establishments in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair 19% N=14 26% N=19 30% N=22 17% N=12 22% N=16 36% N=26 25% N=18 18% N=10 46% N=26 25% N=14 12% N=7 38% N=34 24% N=22 8% N=7 87 Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Overall quality of business and service establishments in Buckeye Poor Variety of business and service establishments in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Excellent Good Fair Poor Employment opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Shopping opportunities Excellent 30% N=27 48% N=44 34% N=31 12% N=11 5% N=5 54% N=44 25% N=20 17% N=14 4% N=3 45% N=30 35% N=23 15% N=10 5% N=3 1% N=1 88 Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Shopping opportunities Good Fair Poor Cost of living in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall image or reputation of Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Traffic flow on major streets Excellent Good Fair 52% N=46 36% N=32 11% N=10 19% N=17 48% N=44 32% N=29 1% N=1 26% N=23 31% N=28 36% N=32 8% N=7 28% N=25 32% N=28 2% N=2 89 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Traffic flow on major streets Poor Ease of public parking Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by car in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by public transportation in Buckeye Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by bicycle in Buckeye Excellent Good 38% N=33 19% N=15 33% N=27 46% N=37 2% N=2 17% N=15 30% N=27 38% N=34 16% N=14 95% N=58 3% N=2 2% N=1 10% N=6 5% N=3 90 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Ease of travel by bicycle in Buckeye Fair Poor Ease of walking in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned commercial growth Excellent Good Fair Poor 53% N=31 31% N=18 35% N=28 28% N=22 26% N=21 11% N=9 40% N=36 25% N=22 29% N=26 6% N=5 45% N=40 28% N=25 24% N=21 2% N=2 91 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Public places where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Excellent Good 24% N=22 31% N=28 37% N=34 8% N=7 26% N=18 27% N=19 43% N=30 4% N=3 39% N=33 33% N=28 24% N=20 4% N=3 34% N=28 4% N=3 92 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Variety of housing options Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of new development in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall appearance of Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor 28% N=23 35% N=29 32% N=26 38% N=31 27% N=22 4% N=3 35% N=31 21% N=19 40% N=36 3% N=3 21% N=19 35% N=32 37% N=34 8% N=7 93 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Cleanliness of Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Air quality Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of paths and walking trails Excellent Good Fair Poor Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) Excellent Good 17% N=15 29% N=26 44% N=40 10% N=9 17% N=16 38% N=35 38% N=35 8% N=7 28% N=24 16% N=14 41% N=35 15% N=13 30% N=25 15% N=12 94 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) Fair Poor Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality food Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality health care Excellent Good Fair Poor 27% N=22 28% N=23 28% N=24 29% N=25 33% N=28 10% N=9 42% N=38 31% N=28 24% N=22 3% N=3 35% N=28 30% N=24 31% N=25 5% N=4 95 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Availability of preventive health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality mental health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Community support for the arts Excellent Good 39% N=30 32% N=25 23% N=18 5% N=4 67% N=33 22% N=11 8% N=4 2% N=1 50% N=43 35% N=30 13% N=11 2% N=2 10% N=7 3% N=2 96 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Community support for the arts Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Good Fair Poor K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor Adult educational opportunities Good Fair Poor Sense of civic/community pride Excellent Good 48% N=34 39% N=28 53% N=18 35% N=12 12% N=4 33% N=19 35% N=20 28% N=16 4% N=2 41% N=25 46% N=28 13% N=8 33% N=28 3% N=3 97 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Sense of civic/community pride Fair Poor Neighborliness of residents in Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair Poor 27% N=23 37% N=32 17% N=15 35% N=31 36% N=32 12% N=11 26% N=22 30% N=25 36% N=30 8% N=7 17% N=15 36% N=31 36% N=31 10% N=9 98 Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent Good Fair Poor Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Buckeye (in-person, phone, email, or web) for help or information No Yes 21% N=14 36% N=24 33% N=22 9% N=6 29% N=21 38% N=28 26% N=19 7% N=5 18% N=13 19% N=14 51% N=37 12% N=9 54% N=51 46% N=43 99 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted Buckeye elected officials (in-person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion No Yes Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.) No Yes Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting No Yes Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Buckeye No Yes Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate No Yes Voted in your most recent local election No Yes Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone No Yes 27% N=25 73% N=69 40% N=37 60% N=56 29% N=27 71% N=66 24% N=23 76% N=71 13% N=12 87% N=82 74% N=70 26% N=24 39% N=37 61% N=57 100 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Walked or biked instead of driving No Yes Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Public information services Excellent Good Fair Poor Economic development Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor 32% N=30 68% N=64 11% N=9 43% N=36 35% N=29 11% N=9 25% N=21 33% N=28 32% N=27 11% N=9 29% N=24 21% N=18 40% N=34 10% N=8 101 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Traffic signal timing Excellent Good Fair Poor Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair Poor Street lighting Excellent Good 19% N=17 31% N=27 42% N=37 8% N=7 25% N=23 41% N=38 26% N=24 8% N=7 17% N=15 26% N=23 44% N=39 13% N=11 49% N=45 8% N=7 102 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Street lighting Fair Poor Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor Bus or transit services Good Fair Poor Land use, planning, and zoning Excellent Good Fair Poor Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) Excellent 15% N=14 28% N=26 22% N=19 23% N=20 41% N=35 14% N=12 92% N=47 6% N=3 2% N=1 47% N=35 35% N=26 17% N=13 1% N=1 6% N=4 103 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) Good Fair Poor Affordable high-speed internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Poor Drinking water Excellent Good Fair 28% N=20 40% N=29 26% N=19 34% N=31 28% N=25 32% N=29 6% N=5 1% N=1 13% N=12 47% N=42 39% N=35 28% N=25 31% N=28 8% N=7 104 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Drinking water Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair Poor Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) Excellent Good Fair Poor Power (electric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent 33% N=30 6% N=5 14% N=12 60% N=50 19% N=16 9% N=7 26% N=20 49% N=37 16% N=12 8% N=7 22% N=20 51% N=47 20% N=18 12% N=11 105 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Utility billing Good Fair Poor Police services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair Poor Animal control Excellent Good Fair 23% N=21 28% N=26 38% N=35 10% N=9 17% N=15 37% N=32 36% N=31 19% N=15 17% N=14 42% N=34 22% N=18 27% N=16 35% N=21 7% N=4 106 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Animal control Poor Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire prevention and education Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 32% N=19 8% N=5 20% N=12 37% N=22 34% N=20 3% N=2 13% N=8 43% N=26 40% N=24 12% N=6 24% N=12 46% N=23 18% N=9 11% N=5 Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) 107 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) Good Fair Poor Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) Excellent Good Fair Poor Buckeye open space Excellent Good Fair Poor Recycling Excellent Good Fair 28% N=13 35% N=16 26% N=12 33% N=25 31% N=23 31% N=23 5% N=4 25% N=19 27% N=21 40% N=31 8% N=6 17% N=14 40% N=33 18% N=15 108 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Recycling Poor Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilities Excellent 24% N=20 19% N=12 24% N=15 32% N=20 24% N=15 18% N=15 19% N=16 42% N=36 21% N=18 19% N=14 29% N=21 34% N=25 18% N=13 14% N=10 109 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Recreation centers or facilities Good Fair Poor Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Public library services Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Buckeye employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) Excellent Good Fair 25% N=18 29% N=21 32% N=23 31% N=23 32% N=24 31% N=23 5% N=4 5% N=4 18% N=15 45% N=37 33% N=27 21% N=18 43% N=36 27% N=23 110 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Overall customer service by Buckeye employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) Poor Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Buckeye Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall direction that Buckeye is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor The job Buckeye government does at welcoming resident involvement Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall confidence in Buckeye government Excellent 8% N=7 29% N=25 29% N=25 38% N=32 4% N=3 30% N=28 32% N=29 32% N=29 7% N=6 22% N=15 34% N=23 36% N=24 7% N=5 6% N=5 111 Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. Overall confidence in Buckeye government Good Fair Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Being honest Excellent Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the public Excellent Good Fair 32% N=27 24% N=20 38% N=32 38% N=29 14% N=11 43% N=33 5% N=4 29% N=20 21% N=15 44% N=31 6% N=4 29% N=23 33% N=26 8% N=6 112 Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. Being open and transparent to the public Poor Informing residents about issues facing the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating all residents fairly Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Excellent Good Fair Poor The City of Buckeye Excellent 31% N=25 34% N=28 24% N=20 35% N=29 7% N=6 28% N=17 21% N=13 41% N=25 10% N=6 18% N=14 29% N=22 38% N=29 14% N=11 12% N=11 Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? 113 Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Buckeye Good Fair Poor The Federal Government Good Fair Poor Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health of Buckeye Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Buckeye Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Essential 18% N=16 27% N=25 43% N=39 52% N=44 27% N=23 20% N=17 8% N=7 39% N=36 54% N=50 2% N=2 18% N=17 39% N=36 40% N=37 58% N=54 Overall design or layout of Buckeye's residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) 114 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall design or layout of Buckeye's residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) Very important Somewhat important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Buckeye (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall feeling of safety in Buckeye Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall quality of natural environment in Buckeye Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important 10% N=9 32% N=30 6% N=6 26% N=24 68% N=63 9% N=8 24% N=22 67% N=62 19% N=17 29% N=26 53% N=48 12% N=11 45% N=42 40% N=37 115 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Not at all important Overall health and wellness opportunities in Buckeye Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Residents' connection and engagement with their community Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home using a computer, laptop, or tablet computer Several times a day 3% N=3 2% N=2 14% N=13 38% N=35 46% N=42 4% N=4 14% N=13 41% N=38 41% N=38 2% N=2 22% N=20 43% N=40 33% N=31 90% N=83 116 In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home using a computer, laptop, or tablet computer Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Visit social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc. Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Use or check email Several times a day 1% N=1 3% N=3 5% N=5 5% N=5 1% N=1 4% N=4 9% N=8 81% N=75 5% N=5 3% N=3 5% N=5 14% N=13 72% N=67 85% N=78 117 In general, how many times do you: Use or check email Once a day A few times a week Share your opinions online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Shop online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Please rate your overall health. Excellent Very good 3% N=3 12% N=11 31% N=28 21% N=19 19% N=17 9% N=8 19% N=17 9% N=8 26% N=23 32% N=28 14% N=12 19% N=17 43% N=40 22% N=20 118 Please rate your overall health. Good Fair Poor What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative How many years have you lived in Buckeye? Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years Which best describes the building you live in? Single-family detached home 1% N=1 8% N=7 27% N=25 15% N=14 34% N=32 38% N=35 12% N=11 1% N=1 5% N=5 22% N=20 30% N=28 36% N=33 7% N=6 98% N=91 119 Which best describes the building you live in? Mobile home Do you rent or own your home? Rent Own About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? Less than $300 $300 to $599 $600 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $2,499 $2,500 to $3,999 $4,000 to $6,999 Do any children 17 or under live in your household? No Yes Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes 2% N=2 95% N=88 5% N=5 2% N=2 11% N=10 46% N=42 25% N=23 9% N=8 4% N=4 2% N=2 30% N=28 70% N=65 40% N=37 60% N=56 120 How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 to $299,999 $300,000 or more Are you of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin? No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin Yes, I consider myself to be of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American White 1% N=1 6% N=5 13% N=11 28% N=25 18% N=16 19% N=17 11% N=10 3% N=3 14% N=13 86% N=78 86% N=79 2% N=2 1% N=1 1% N=1 121 What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) A race not listed In which category is your age? 18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65-74 years 75 years or older What is your gender? Woman Man 13% N=12 12% N=11 16% N=15 23% N=21 18% N=17 22% N=20 8% N=7 1% N=1 38% N=35 62% N=58 122 November 2023 Dear City of Buckeye Resident: Please help us shape the future of Buckeye! You have been selected at random to participate in the 2023 Buckeye Community Survey. If you’ve already completed the survey online, thank you. Please do not respond twice. Please take a few minutes to fill out the enclosed survey. Your participation in this survey is very important—especially since your household is one of only a small number of households being surveyed. Your feedback will help Buckeye make decisions that affect our city. A few things to remember: • Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. • In order to hear from a diverse group of residents, the adult 18 years or older in your household who most recently had a birthday should complete this survey. • You may return the survey by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or you can complete the survey online at: https://polco.us/xxplaceholder Please do not share your survey link. This survey is for randomly selected households only. The City will conduct a separate survey that is open to all residents just a few weeks from now. If you have any questions about the survey, please call 623-349-6000. Thank you for your time and participation! Sincerely, Estimado Residente de la Ciudad de Buckeye: ¡Por favor ayúdenos a moldear el futuro de Buckeye! Usted ha sido seleccionado al azar para participar en la Encuesta de la Comunidad de Buckeye del 2023. Si ya completó la encuesta en línea, gracias. Por favor no responda dos veces. Por favor tome unos minutos para completar la encuesta adjunta; si usted preferiría completar la encuesta en español, por favor siga las instrucciones abajo para acceder a la encuesta en español por medio de la red. Su participación en esta encuesta es muy importante—especialmente porque su hogar es uno de solamente un número pequeño de hogares que se están encuestando. Sus observaciones le ayudarán a Buckeye tomar decisiones que afectarán a nuestra ciudad. Algunas cosas para recordar: • Sus respuestas son confidenciales y no se compartirá ninguna información de identificación. • Para poder escuchar a un grupo diverso de residentes, el adulto de 18 años o más en su hogar que haya celebrado su cumpleaños más recientemente debe completar esta encuesta. • Puede devolver la encuesta en ingles por correo en el sobre pre-pagado adjunto, o puede completar la encuesta en línea en español en: https://polco.us/xxplaceholder Por favor no comparta el enlace de su encuesta. Esta encuesta es solamente para hogares seleccionados al azar. La Ciudad conducirá una encuesta separada que está abierta a todos los residentes dentro de unas semanas. Si tiene alguna pregunta sobre la encuesta, por favor llame al 623-349-6000. ¡Gracias por su tiempo y participación! Atentamente, Eric Orsborn Mayor/Alcalde QR CODE HERE QR CODE HERE 123 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Buckeye 2022 Community Survey Page 1 of 5 Please complete this survey if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a birthday (the year of birth does not matter). Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. 1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Buckeye. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Buckeye as a place to live ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Your neighborhood as a place to live .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Buckeye as a place to raise children ................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Buckeye as a place to work .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Buckeye as a place to visit .................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Buckeye as a place to retire ................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 The overall quality of life in Buckeye .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of community ................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Buckeye as a whole. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Overall economic health of Buckeye ................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Buckeye ............................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall design or layout of Buckeye’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) ................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Buckeye (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) ........................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall feeling of safety in Buckeye ................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of natural environment in Buckeye .................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Buckeye ........................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .......................... 1 2 3 4 5 3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t likely likely unlikely unlikely know Recommend living in Buckeye to someone who asks ........................1 2 3 4 5 Remain in Buckeye for the next five years ..............................................1 2 3 4 5 4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don’t safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know In your neighborhood during the day ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 In Buckeye’s downtown/commercial area during the day ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From property crime ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From violent crime ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From fire, flood, or other natural disaster ............................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Please rate the job you feel the Buckeye community does at each of the following. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Making all residents feel welcome ................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Attracting people from diverse backgrounds .............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) ........... 1 2 3 4 5 6. Please rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Overall quality of business and service establishments in Buckeye .................. 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of business and service establishments in Buckeye ................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Employment opportunities ................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Shopping opportunities......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Cost of living in Buckeye ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall image or reputation of Buckeye ........................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. Page 2 of 5 7. Please also rate each of the following in the Buckeye community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Traffic flow on major streets ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of public parking ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by car in Buckeye ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by public transportation in Buckeye .................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by bicycle in Buckeye ................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of walking in Buckeye.................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Well-planned residential growth ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Well-planned commercial growth .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Well-designed neighborhoods ........................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community ............ 1 2 3 4 5 Public places where people want to spend time ........................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of housing options ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality housing ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of new development in Buckeye ........................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall appearance of Buckeye.......................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Cleanliness of Buckeye .......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Air quality .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of paths and walking trails .......................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) ... 1 2 3 4 5 Recreational opportunities .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality food ............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality health care ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of preventive health services ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality mental health care ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities .......................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Community support for the arts ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 K-12 education .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Adult educational opportunities ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of civic/community pride ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Neighborliness of residents in Buckeye ......................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities .................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend special events and festivals................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to volunteer .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in community matters ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. No Yes Contacted the City of Buckeye (in-person, phone, email, or web) for help or information .............................. 1 2 Contacted Buckeye elected officials (in-person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion.................. 1 2 Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.) ............................................ 1 2 Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting ............................................................................................... 1 2 Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Buckeye ........................................................................................... 1 2 Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate .................................................................................. 1 2 Voted in your most recent local election ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone............................................................................... 1 2 Walked or biked instead of driving ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Buckeye 2022 Community Survey Page 3 of 5 9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Buckeye. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Public information services ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Economic development ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic enforcement ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic signal timing ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Street repair ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Street cleaning ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Street lighting ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Sidewalk maintenance ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Bus or transit services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Land use, planning, and zoning ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Affordable high-speed internet access ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Garbage collection ............................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Drinking water ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sewer services ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) .................... 1 2 3 4 5 Power (electric and/or gas) utility ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Utility billing .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Police services ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Crime prevention ................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Animal control ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ambulance or emergency medical services ............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Fire services ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Fire prevention and education ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) ..... 1 2 3 4 5 Buckeye open space ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Recycling .................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Yard waste pick-up.............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 City parks................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation programs or classes .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation centers or facilities ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Health services ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Public library services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall customer service by Buckeye employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 10. Please rate the following categories of Buckeye government performance. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The value of services for the taxes paid to Buckeye ............................................. 1 2 3 4 5 The overall direction that Buckeye is taking............................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 The job Buckeye government does at welcoming resident involvement .......... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall confidence in Buckeye government ............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Generally acting in the best interest of the community ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Being honest........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Being open and transparent to the public ................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Informing residents about issues facing the community.................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Treating all residents fairly ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Treating residents with respect .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The City of Buckeye ............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 The Federal Government .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. Page 4 of 5 12. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Buckeye community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Very Somewhat Not at all Essential important important important Overall economic health of Buckeye ...................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Buckeye..................................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall design or layout of Buckeye’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) .....................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Buckeye (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband)...........................................1 2 3 4 Overall feeling of safety in Buckeye ....................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of natural environment in Buckeye .....................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ...............................................1 2 3 4 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Buckeye ..............................................1 2 3 4 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts........................................1 2 3 4 Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .............................1 2 3 4 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2022 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Buckeye 2022 Community Survey Page 5 of 5 Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. D1. In general, how many times do you: Several Once A few times Every Less often Don’t times a day a day a week few weeks or never know Access the internet from your home using a computer, laptop, or tablet computer ......................1 2 3 4 5 6 Access the internet from your cell phone .......................1 2 3 4 5 6 Visit social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc. .......................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Use or check email ....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Share your opinions online ...................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Shop online ..................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 D2. Please rate your overall health. Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative D4. How many years have you lived in Buckeye? Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years D5. Which best describes the building you live in? One family house detached from any other houses Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apartment, or condominium) Mobile home Other D6. Do you rent or own your home? Rent Own D7. About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners’ association (HOA) fees)? Less than $500 $2,000 to $2,499 $500 to $999 $2,500 to $2,999 $1,000 to $1,499 $3,000 to $3,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $3,500 or more D8. Do any children 17 or under live in your household? No Yes D9. Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes D10. How much do you anticipate your household’s total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $75,000 to $99,999 $25,000 to $49,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $150,000 or more D11. Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino? No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino D12. What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) ❑ American Indian or Alaskan Native ❑ Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander ❑ Black or African American ❑ White ❑ Other D13. In which category is your age? 18-24 years 55-64 years 25-34 years 65-74 years 35-44 years 75 years or older 45-54 years D14. What is your gender? Woman Man Identify in another way → go to D14a D14a. If you identify in another way, how would you describe your gender? Agender/I don’t identify with any gender Genderqueer/gender fluid Non-binary Transgender man Transgender woman Two-spirit Identify in another way Thank you! Please return the completed survey in the postage-paid envelope to: National Research Center, Inc., PO Box 549, Belle Mead, NJ 08502 BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 223 Appendix B: Map Atlas Chapter 1: Introduction – Buckeye’s Regional Setting Chapter 1: Introduction – Regional Vicinity Chapter 1: Introduction – Buckeye Study Area Chapter 1: Introduction – Population Density (1/3) Chapter 1: Introduction – Population Density (2/3) Chapter 1: Introduction – Population Density (3/3) Chapter 1: Introduction – Employment Density (1/3) Chapter 1: Introduction – Employment Density (2/3) Chapter 1: Introduction – Employment Density (3/3) Chapter 2: Street Plan – Existing Lane Configuration Chapter 2: Street Plan – City Classification Chapter 2: Street Plan – ADOT Functional Classification Chapter 2: Street Plan – MAG Facility Type Chapter 2: Street Plan – Agency Responsibility Chapter 2: Street Plan – All Crash Density (1/2) Chapter 2: Street Plan – All Crash Density (2/2) Chapter 2: Street Plan – Fatal and Serious Injury Crash Locations (1/2) Chapter 2: Street Plan – Fatal and Serious Injury Crash Locations (2/2) Chapter 2: Street Plan – Functional Classification of MCDOT roadways from the MCDOT TSP 2040 Chapter 2: Street Plan – MCDOT MSRP Classifications from 411th Avenue to Airport Road, MC 85 to Dove Valley Road Chapter 2: Street Plan – MCDOT MSRP Classifications from Airport Road to 27th Avenue, Baseline Road to Dove Valley Road Chapter 2: Street Plan – MCDOT MSRP Classifications from 411th Avenue to Airport Road, Powerline Road to Hazen Road Chapter 2: Street Plan – MCDOT MSRP Classifications from Airport Road to 27th Avenue, Schumacher Road to Broadway Road Chapter 2: Street Plan – ADOT I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS (Buckeye Area Only) Chapter 2: Street Plan – MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study, Recommended Transportation Framework Chapter 2: Street Plan – Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study Recommended Framework Chapter 2: Street Plan – MAG RTP Recommended Corridors Chapter 2: Street Plan – (2023) Traffic Volumes Chapter 2: Street Plan – 2023 Level of Service Chapter 2: Street Plan – Imagine Buckeye: 2040 General Plan Chapter 2: Street Plan – Scenario 1: Buildout Network with Circulation Master Plan and City Updates Chapter 2: Street Plan – Scenario 2: Buildout Network with Bruner Road Interchange and Yuma Road Realignment Chapter 2: Street Plan – Scenario 3: Buildout Network with Scenario 2 Changes and Principal Arterials Chapter 2: Street Plan – Future Street Network by City Classification Chapter 2: Street Plan – Future Street Network by Agency Responsibility Chapter 4: Transit – Recommended Circulator Alternative with Stop Locations Chapter 4: Transit – Local Route Extensions Chapter 4: Transit – SWVLTSS Long-range transit service plan Chapter 4: Transit – Estrella Line Corridor Railroad Facilities Chapter 4: Transit – Transit Plan Recommendations Chapter 5: Active Transportation – Existing Active Transportation Facilities Chapter 5: Active Transportation – Existing and Potential Bike Routes Chapter 5: Active Transportation – Off-Street – Paths and Trails Chapter 5: Active Transportation – Planned Primary and Secondary Trail Network Chapter 5: Active Transportation – MCDOT Active Transportation Plan: Pedestrian Network Needs Chapter 5: Active Transportation – MCDOT Active Transportation: Bicycle Network Needs Chatper 5: Active Transportation – Bicycle and Pedestrian Involved Crash Locations Chapter 6: Aviation – Exisitng Airports Chapter 6: Aviation – Exisitng Buckeye Municipal Airport Chapter 6: Aviation - Aviation Plan Recommendations Chapter 6: Aviation – Development Staging of Buckeye Municipal Airport Capital Improvement Program Chapter 7: Rail – Existing Rail Facilities Chapter 7: Rail – Wellton Branch Railroad Rehabilitation Study – Study Area Chapter 7: Rail – Hassayampa Valley Rail Corridor Segment Alternatives Chapter 7: Rail – MAG Commuter Rail System 2040 Daily Boardings by Station Chapter 7: Rail – ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan – Arizona Spine Corridor of Opportunity Chapter 7: Rail – ADOT Arizona State Rail Plan – Sunset Route Corridor of Opportunity Chapter 7: Rail – ADOT Passenger Rail Study: Tucson to Phoenix – Preferred Alternative Chapter 7: Rail – Rail Plan Recommendations, 2018 Chapter 8: Freight – Major Industrial Areas in Buckeye Chapter 8: Freight – MAG Regional Freight Network Report – Final Freight Network Chapter 8: Freight – Freight Plan Recommendations Chapter 9: Intelligent Transportation Systems – Existing ITS Facilities Chapter 9: Intelligent Transportation Systems – ITS Plan Recommendations BUCKEYE IN MOTION • TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 224 Appendix C: Existing and Future Roadway Network Table Existing Street Network Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type East-West Roadways Baseline Rd 331st Ave Palo Verde Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Baseline Rd Palo Verde Rd Rooks Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Baseline Rd Rooks Rd Miller Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Baseline Rd Miller Rd 2nd Ave E 2 Lane Collector City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Collector Baseline Rd 2nd Ave E 5th Ave E 2 Lane Collector MCDOT Minor Arterial Collector Baseline Rd 5th Ave E MC 85 2 Lane Collector City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Collector Beardsley Pkwy Wagner Complex Dr Desert Vista Blvd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Beloat Rd Rooks Rd Miller Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Beloat Rd 7th St Rainbow Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Beloat Rd Rainbow Rd Jackrabbi t Trail 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Broadway Rd Johnson Rd Palo Verde Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road MCDOT Minor Collector Unpaved Road Broadway Rd SR 85 266th Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Broadway Rd 266th Ave Rainbow Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Broadway Rd Rainbow Rd Perryville Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Camelbac k Rd Jackrabbit Trail Beardsley Canal 4 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Camelbac k Rd Beardsley Canal Perryville Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Desert Rose Rd Old US Hwy 80 Arlington School Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Hazen Rd Wilson Ave 279th Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Major Collector Arterial Hazen Rd 279th Ave Turner Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Hazen Rd Turner Rd SR 85 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Major Collector Arterial Hazen Rd SR 85 Miller Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type I-10 Hassayam pa River SR 85 4 Lane Freeway ADOT Interstate Freeway I-10 SR 85 Perryville Rd 6 Lane Freeway ADOT Interstate Freeway Indian School Rd Verrado Way Sunrise Ln 2 Lane Collector City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Collector Indian School Rd Sunrise Ln Jackrabbi t Trail 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Indian School Rd Jackrabbit Trail Perryville Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Irwin Ave Miller Rd 7th St 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Lower Buckeye Rd Westpark Loop 255th Ln 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Lower Buckeye Rd 255th Ln Miller Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Lower Buckeye Rd Miller Rd Watson Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Lower Buckeye Rd Watson Rd Rainbow Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Lower Buckeye Rd Rainbow Rd 223rd Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Lower Buckeye Rd Dean Rd Perryville Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial MC 85 Turner Rd Miller Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Principal Arterial Arterial MC 85 Miller Rd Apache 2 Lane Collector City of Buckeye Principal Arterial Minor Collector MC 85 Apache Rd Perryville Rd 2 Lane Expressway MCDOT Principal Arterial Expressw ay McDowell Rd Watson Rd Rainbow Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Local Unpaved Road McDowell Rd 214th Ave Sienna Hills Pkwy 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial McDowell Rd Sienna Hills Pkwy Verrado Way 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial McDowell Rd Verrado Way 202nd Ave 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Unpaved Road McDowell Rd 202nd Ave Perryville Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Monroe Ave Miller Rd Apache Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Principal Arterial Arterial Northern Ave Beardsley Canal Rd Perryville Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Old US Hwy 80 Salome Hwy SR 85 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Major Collector Arterial Olive Ave Perryville Rd White Tank Mountain Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Major Collector Arterial Patton Rd 299th Ave 259th Ave 2 Collector MCDOT Major Collector Collector Riggs Rd Komatke Rd 203rd Ave 2 Lane Unpaved Road MCDOT Local Unpaved Road Roosevelt St Johnson Rd Bruner Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Salome Hwy 331st Ave Old US Hwy 80 2 Lane Collector MCDOT Major Collector Collector Southern Ave Johnson Rd Palo Verde Rd 2 Lane Collector MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Southern Ave Palo Verde Rd SR 85 2 Lane Collector MCDOT Major Collector Arterial Southern Ave SR 85 263rd Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Southern Ave 263rd Ave 231st Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Southern Ave 231st Ave Dean Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Southern Ave Jackrabbit Trail Perryville Rd 2 Lane Collector MCDOT Minor Arterial Collector Sun Valley Pkwy 291st Ave 259th Ave 4 Lane Collector MCDOT Minor Arterial Collector Tartesso Pkwy Indian School Rd Sun Valley Pkwy 4 Lane Collector City of Buckeye Major Collector Collector Thomas Rd Celeborn Dr 303rd Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Thomas Rd 303rd Ave Sun Valley Pkwy 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Major Collector Arterial Thomas Rd Verrado Way Acacia Way 2 Lane Collector City of Buckeye Major Collector Collector Thomas Rd Acacia Way 202nd Ave 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Local Unpaved Road Thomas Rd 202nd Ave Jackrabbi t Trail 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Local Arterial Thomas Rd Jackrabbit Trail Perryville Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Tonopah- Salome Hwy Hassayam pa River Johnson Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road MCDOT Local Unpaved Road Tonopah- Salome Hwy Johnson Rd Sun Valley Pkwy 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Minor Collector Unpaved Road Tonopah- Salome Hwy Sun Valley Pkwy Turner Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Local Unpaved Road Tonopah- Salome Hwy Turner Rd Yuma Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road MCDOT Local Unpaved Road Tonopah- Salome Hwy Yuma Rd Miller Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Minor Collector Unpaved Road Van Buren St 299th Ave Sun Valley Pkwy 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Van Buren St Sundance Pkwy Verrado Way 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Van Buren St Jackrabbit Trail Perryville Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Victory Blvd Verrado Way Pasadena Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Yuma Rd Johnson Rd Bruner Rd Alignmen t 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Yuma Rd Bruner Rd Alignment Palo Verde Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Collector Arterial Yuma Rd Durango St 237th Ln 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Yuma Rd 237th Ln Watson Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Yuma Rd Watson Rd 219th Ave 6 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Yuma Rd 219th Ave 199th Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Yuma Rd 199th Ave Perryville Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial North-South Roadways 203rd Ave Riggs Rd Chandler Heights Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Local Unpaved Road 299th Ave Van Buren St McKinley St 2 Lane Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial 331st Ave Salome Hwy Broadway Rd 2 Lane Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type 331st Ave Broadway Rd Van Buren St 2 Lane Unpaved Road MCDOT Local Unpaved Road Apache Rd Beloat Rd MC 85 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Local Arterial Apache Rd Baseline Rd Southern Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Local Arterial Apache Rd Southern Ave Warner St 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Apache Rd Warner St Verlea Dr 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Apache Rd Verlea Dr Yuma Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Bruner Rd Old US Hwy 80 Lower River Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Local Arterial Bruner Rd Baseline Rd Broadway Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road MCDOT Local Unpaved Road Bruner Rd Thomas Rd Tartesso Pkwy 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Canyon Springs Rd Sun Valley Pkwy Tina Ln 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Dean Rd Beloat Rd Lower Buckeye Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Dean Rd Lower Buckeye Rd Ripple Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Dean Rd Ripple Rd Yuma Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Desert Oasis Blvd Sun Valley Pkwy Beardsley Pkwy 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Jackrabbit Trail Beloat Rd Blue Horizons Pkwy 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Jackrabbit Trail Blue Horizons Pkwy Van Buren St 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Jackrabbit Trail Van Buren St Roosevelt St 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Jackrabbit Trail Roosevelt St I-10 South Side 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Jackrabbit Trail I-10 South Side McDowell Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial ADOT Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Jackrabbit Trail McDowell Rd North of Exeter Blvd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Jackrabbit Trail North of Exeter Blvd Marshall Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Major Collector Arterial Jackrabbit Trail Marshall Ave Bethany Home Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Local Arterial Johnson Rd Old US Hwy 80 Lower River Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Johnson Rd Lower River Rd I-10 South Side 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Johnson Rd I-10 South Side I-10 North Side 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Johnson Rd I-10 North Side Tonopah- Salome Hwy 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Miller Rd Sunrise Dr Beloat Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Miller Rd Beloat Rd Lower Buckeye Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Miller Rd Lower Buckeye Rd Yuma Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Miller Rd Yuma Rd I-10 North Side 2 Lane Minor Arterial ADOT Minor Arterial Arterial Miller Rd I-10 North Side Tonopah- Salome Hwy 2 Lane Collector ADOT Minor Collector Arterial Miller Rd Tonopah- Salome Hwy Van Buren St 2 Lane Minor Arterial City Minor Arterial Arterial Old US Hwy 80 Woods Rd Salome Hwy 2 Lane Collector MCDOT Major Collector Collector Palo Verde Rd Old US Hwy 80 Baseline Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Palo Verde Rd Baseline Rd Roosevelt Canal 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Palo Verde Rd Roosevelt Canal Yuma Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Palo Verde Rd Yuma Rd I-10 South Side 2 Lane Minor Arterial ADOT Minor Arterial Arterial Palo Verde Rd I-10 South Side I-10 North Side 2 Lane Minor Arterial ADOT Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Rainbow Rd MC 85 Southern Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Local Arterial Rainbow Rd Southern Ave Durango St 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Rainbow Rd Durango St Yuma Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Rooks Rd Hazen Rd Beloat Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Collector Arterial Rooks Rd Beloat Rd MC 85 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Rooks Rd Baseline Rd Southern Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Rooks Rd Southern Ave Broadway Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Unpaved Road Rooks Rd Broadway Rd Roosevelt Canal 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Local Unpaved Road SR 85 Woods Rd Milepost 136 2 Lane Expressway ADOT Principal Arterial Expressw ay SR 85 Milepost 136 Komatke Rd 2 Lane Expressway ADOT Freeway Expressw ay SR 85 Komatke Rd I-10 2 Lane Expressway ADOT Principal Arterial Expressw ay Sun Valley Pkwy I-10 North Side 291st Ave 2 Lane Collector MCDOT Minor Arterial Collector Turner Rd Old US Hwy 80 Hazen Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Major Collector Unpaved Road Turner Rd Hazen Rd UPRR 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Turner Rd UPRR Southern Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Local Arterial Tuthill Rd Gila River Beloat Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Local Arterial Tuthill Rd Broadway Rd Roosevelt Canal 2 Lane Collector MCDOT Local Collector Tuthill Rd Yuma Rd Blue Horizons Pkwy 2 Lane Collector City of Buckeye Major Collector Collector Verrado Way Beloat Rd Yuma Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Minor Arterial Arterial Verrado Way Yuma Rd Van Buren St 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Verrado Way Van Buren St I-10 South Side 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Verrado Way I-10 South Side I-10 North Side 4 Lane Arterial ADOT Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Verrado Way I-10 North Side McDowell Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Verrado Way McDowell Rd Victory Blvd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Watson Rd Beloat Rd Buckeye Canal 2 Lane Collector City of Buckeye Major Collector Collector Watson Rd Southern Ave Broadway Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Watson Rd Broadway Rd Lower Buckeye Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Watson Rd Lower Buckeye Rd Durango St 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Watson Rd Durango St I-10 South Side 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Arterial Arterial Watson Rd I-10 South Side I-10 North Side 4 Lane Arterial ADOT Minor Arterial Arterial Watson Rd I-10 North Side Woodlan ds Ave 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Major Collector Arterial Watson Rd Woodland s Ave McDowell Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Minor Collector Arterial Wicken- burg Rd Coyote Wash Jackrabbi t Wash 2 Lane Collector MCDOT Major Collector Collector Wilson Ave Old US Hwy 80 Hazen Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Major Collector Arterial Wilson Ave Hazen Rd Buckeye Canal 2 Lane Unpaved Road MCDOT Local Unpaved Road Wilson Ave Buckeye Canal Baseline Rd 2 Lane Unpaved Road City of Buckeye Local Unpaved Road Wilson Ave Baseline Rd Southern Ave 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Local Arterial Future Street Network Table Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type East-West Roadways Baseline Rd 331st Ave SR 85 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Baseline Rd SR 85 Rooks Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Baseline Rd Rooks Rd Miller Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Bell Rd Hidden Waters Pkwy Wilson Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Bethany Home Rd Johnson Rd Turner Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Black Mountain Rd 287th Avenue Canyon Springs Blvd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Broadwa y Rd Johnson Rd Rainbow Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Broadwa y Rd Rainbow Rd Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Camelba ck Rd Hidden Waters Pkwy Oglesby Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Camelba ck Rd Jackrabbit Trail Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Carefree Highway Alignmen t Turner Pkwy Canyon Springs Blvd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Dixileta Drive Turner Pkwy 243rd Ave 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Elliot Rd MPA Boundary Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Glendale Rd Johnson Rd Turner Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Glendale Rd 315th Ave Johnson Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Glendale Rd Jackrabbit Trail Beardsley Canal 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Greenwa y Rd I-11 Turner Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial I-10 MPA Boundary Perryville Rd Freeway ADOT Interstate/ Other Freeway and Expressway Freeway I-11 MPA Boundary MPA Boundary Freeway ADOT Interstate/ Other Freeway and Expressway Freeway Indian School Rd MPA Boundary Johnson Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Indian School Rd Johnson Rd Tartesso Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Indian School Rd Verrado Way Beardsley Canal 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Indian School Rd Beardsley Canal Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Jomax Rd 287th Ave Canyon Springs Blvd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Lone Mountain Rd Canyon Springs Blvd 243rd Ave 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Loop 303 SR 30 Elliot Rd Freeway ADOT Interstate/ Other Freeway and Expressway Freeway Lower Buckeye Rd Palo Verde Rd Turner Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Lower Buckeye Rd Westpark Loop Watson Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Lower Buckeye Rd Watson Rd Rainbow Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Lower Buckeye Rd Rainbow Rd Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial MC85 Turner Rd SR 85 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type MC85 SR 85 1st St 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial MC85 7th St Apache Rd 2 Lane Minor Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial MC85 Apache Rd Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial McDowel l Pkwy MPA Boundary Dean Rd 6 Lane Parkway City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial McDowel l Rd Dean Rd Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Monroe Ave 1st St 7th St 2 Lane Minor Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Narramo re Rd MPA Boundary SR 85 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Northern Ave MPA Boundary Turner Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Northern Ave Jackrabbit Trail Perryville Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Olive Ave MPA Boundary Peoria Ave 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Olive Ave Johnson Rd Turner Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Olive Ave Jackrabbit Trail Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Patterso n Rd Hidden Waters Pkwy Bruner Rd 4 Lane Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Patterso n Rd Bruner Rd SR 85 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Patton Rd MPA Boundary MPA Boundary 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Peoria Ave Turner Pkwy Johnson Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Pinnacle Peak Rd 287th Ave Canyon Springs Blvd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Roosevel t St 215th Ave Jackrabbi t Trail 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Southern Ave MPA Boundary Desert Creek Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Southern Ave Desert Creek Rd SR 85 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Southern Ave SR 85 Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial SR 30 MPA Boundary Loop 303 Freeway ADOT Interstate/ Other Freeway and Expressway Freeway Tartesso Pkwy Indian School Rd Sun Valley Pkwy 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Thomas Rd MPA Boundary McDowel l Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Thomas Rd 303rd Ave Bruner Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Thomas Rd Bruner Rd Turner Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Thomas Rd Verrado Way Perryville Rd 4 Lane Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Van Buren St Jackrabbit Trail Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Van Buren St Dean Rd Verrado Way 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial White Tanks Freeway I-11 MPA Boundary Freeway ADOT Interstate/ Other Freeway and Expressway Freeway Wintersb urg Pkwy MPA Boundary Turner Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Wds Rd Johnson Rd SR 85 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Yuma Rd MPA Boundary Broadway Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Yuma Rd Broadway Rd Watson Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Yuma Rd Watson Rd West of Dean Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Yuma Rd West of Dean Rd East of Dean Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Yuma Rd East of Dean Rd Perryville Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial North-South Roadways 215th Ave Roosevelt St Van Buren St 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 271st Ave Turner Pkwy North of Sun Valley Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 271st Ave North of Sun Valley Pkwy Turner Pkwy 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 283rd Ave Riggs Rd Alignment Wds Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 287th Ave Cloud Rd Turner Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 303rd Ave Tartesso Pkwy McDowel Pkwy 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 315th Ave Van Buren St Broadway Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 315th Ave Broadway Rd Southern Ave 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 319th Ave Desert Creek Rd Southern Ave 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 323rd Ave White Tanks Freeway Northern Ave 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 347th Ave White Tanks Freeway Douglas Ranch Rd (Unname d) 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial 347th Ave Douglas Ranch Rd (Unnamed ) Wintersb urg Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Apache Rd Yuma Rd Baseline Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Apache Rd MC85 SR 30 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Bruner Rd Peoria Ave Bethany Home Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Bruner Rd Camelbac k Rd Tartesso Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Bruner Rd Tartesso Pkwy McDowel l Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Bruner Rd McDowell Pkwy Narramor e Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Bruner Rd Chandler Heights Rd Alignment Patterson Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Canyon Springs Blvd Lone Mountain Rd Sun Valley Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Dean Rd McDowell Pkwy 0.5 mi North of I-10 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Dean Rd 0.5 mi North of I-10 0.5 mi South of I-10 8 Lane Principal Arterial ADOT Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Dean Rd 0.5 mi South of I-10 Yuma Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Dean Rd Yuma Rd Roosevelt Irrigation District Canal 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Dean Rd Roosevelt Irrigation District Canal SR 30 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Desert Creek Rd 0.5 mi South of I-10 0.5 mi North of I-10 8 Lane Principal Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Desert Oasis Blvd Turner Pkwy Wilson Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Happy Valley Rd Canyon Springs Blvd MPA Boundary 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Hidden Waters Pkwy Patton Rd Wintersb urg Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Hidden Waters Pkwy MPA Boundary Wds Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Jackrabbi t Trail Olive Ave 0.5 mi North of I-10 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Jackrabbi t Trail 0.5 mi North of I-10 0.5 mi South of I-10 8 Lane Principal Arterial ADOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Jackrabbi t Trail 0.5 mi South of I-10 Van Buren St 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Jackrabbi t Trail Van Buren St Durango St 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Jackrabbi t Trail Durango St SR 30 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Johnson Rd Desert Oasis Blvd Greenwa y Pkwy 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Johnson Rd Greenway Pkwy Wintersb urg Pkwy 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Johnson Rd Wintersbu rg Pkwy Indian School Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Johnson Rd Indian School Rd Thomas Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Johnson Rd Thomas Rd 0.5 mi North of I-10 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Johnson Rd 0.5 mi North of I-10 0.5 mi South of I-10 8 Lane Principal Arterial ADOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Johnson Rd 0.5 mi South of I-10 Elliot Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Johnson Rd I-11 Woods Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Miller Rd McDowell Pkwy 0.5 mi North of I-10 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Miller Rd 0.5 mi North of I-10 0.5 mi South of I-10 8 Lane Road ADOT Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Miller Rd 0.5 mi South of I-10 Gila River 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Palo Verde Rd 0.5 mi North of I-10 0.5 mi South of I-10 8 Lane Principal Arterial ADOT Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Palo Verde Rd 0.5 mi South of I-10 Narramor e Rd 8 Lane Principal Arterial MCDOT Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Perryville Rd Camelbac k Rd Indian School Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Perryville Rd Indian School Rd 0.5 mi North of I-10 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Perryville Rd 0.5 mi North of I-10 0.5 mi South of I-10 8 Lane Principal Arterial ADOT Super Arterial Arterial Perryville Rd 0.5 mi South of I-10 Broadway Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial MCDOT Major Arterial Arterial Perryville Rd Broadway Rd SR 30 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Major Arterial Arterial Rainbow Rd Yuma Rd Southern Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Rainbow Rd Southern Rd SR 30 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Rooks Rd Broadway Rd SR 30 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial SR 85 I-10 Woods Rd Freeway ADOT Interstate/ Other Freeway and Expressway Freeway Sun Valley Pkwy 243rd Ave I-10 8 Lane Principal Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Turner Pkwy Black Mountain Rd I-10 Parkway City of Buckeye Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Turner Rd Van Buren St Broadway Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Turner Rd Broadway Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Turner Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Buckeye Canal Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Turner Rd Buckeye Canal Rd Narramor e Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Tuthill Rd Dean Rd Broadway Rd 4 Lane Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Verrado Way Indian School Rd McDowel l Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Verrado Way McDowell Rd 0.5 mi North of I-10 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Verrado Way 0.5 mi North of I-10 0.5 mi South of I-10 8 Lane Principal Arterial ADOT Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Verrado Way 0.5 mi South of I-10 Yuma Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Verrado Way Yuma Rd SR 30 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Watson Rd McDowell Rd McDowel l Pkwy 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Watson Rd McDowell Pkwy 0.5 mi North of I-10 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Watson Rd 0.5 mi North of I-10 0.5 mi South of I-10 8 Lane Principal Arterial ADOT Urban Principal Arterial Arterial Watson Rd 0.5 mi South of I-10 Gila River 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Wickenb urg Rd South of Vulture Mine Rd North of Union Hills Rd 4 Lane Arterial MCDOT Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Wickenb urg Rd North of Union Hills Rd MPA Boundary 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Road Name From To Number of Lanes and City of Buckeye Facility Type Future Jurisdictional Responsibility ADOT Functional Classification MAG Facility Type Wilson Rd Bell Rd I-10 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Wilson Rd I-10 Broadway Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Wilson Rd Broadway Rd Lower River Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Wilson Rd Lower River Rd Hazen Rd 4 Lane Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial Wilson Rd Hazen Rd Narramor e Rd 6 Lane Major Arterial City of Buckeye Urban Minor Arterial Arterial