Buckeye-4.pdf

City of Buckeye — Regular Council Meeting (2025-12-02)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via ocr_local) 20944 characters
Buckeye-4

9/16/2021

Contact Information

1. Lead Agency

City of Buckeye

2. Contact Name

John Willett

3. Phone

623.349.6282

4. E-Mail Address

jwillett@buckeyeaz.gov

5. Mailing Address

530 East Monroe Avenue | Buckeye, AZ | 85326

Contact Information

Page 1 of 12

Buckeye-4 9/16/2021

CMAQ DATA

This part of the form is used to gather project related data to calculate the estimated emission reductions and cost-effectiveness (CMAQ Score) and also gather the minimum data
needed for a listing of the project in the Transportation Improvement Program.

Federal Funding Eligibility

AILITS projects to be funded with Federal CMAQ funds must be located within a nonattainment area. Please use the map provided in the tab named "Map" to verify that the project is
located in a nonattainment area.

1. Traffic Estimate and Roadway Characteristics

a. Current Annual Average Weekday Traffic (AADT) both directions on the facility or project area: | Z |

- MAG will supply the AADT value based on the GIS data representing the location of project

b. Length (miles): | 11 |

c. Total number of through lanes on the roadway section: | 4 |

2. Data Required for Calculating Estimated Emission Reductions:

Traffic Flow Improvement Project: for projects that involve the installation of traffic signal equipment If yes, complete Section 3 below.

Intelligent Transportation System Project: for projects that involve the installation of fiber, networking

f If yes, complete Section 4 below.
equipment, CCTV cameras, etc. y is

Signal Priority Project - Transit If yes, complete Section 5 below.

Signal Preemption Project - Emergency Vehicle If yes, complete Section 6 below.

Flashing Yellow Signal Project If yes, complete 1 of 2 Methods under Section 7 below.
Regional Systems Management and Operations Project If yes, no additional information is required.

3. Traffic Flow Improvement Project Data (For projects that involve the installation of traffic signal equipment.)

a. Enter the estimated weekday hourly traffic for the peak period (6-9 am and 2-6 pm) in vehicles/hour:

- 10 percent of weekday AADT will be used as a reasonable estimate (MAG will calculate the value) .

b. Enter the pre-improvement (current) average corridor peak period traffic speed: | |

c. Enter the pre-improvement (current) average corridor off-peak period traffic speed: | |

d. In the table, check the box that best describes the project (Check only one box):

Category Before (pre-improvement) Zondition After (post-improvement) condition Expected increase in speed

Advanced computer-based
control. Coordinated time-of-day
operations. Adaptive Signal

Control.
Advanced computer-based

control. Coordinated time-of-day
operations. Adaptive Signal

Control.
Advanced computer-based

control. Coordinated time-of-day
operations. Adaptive Signal
Control.

Non-interconnected, pre-timed signals with old timing plan. 25.0 percent

Interconnected, pre-timed signals with old timing plan. 175 percent

Non-interconnected signals with traffic-actuated controllers. 16.0 percent

Interconnected, pre-timed signals with actively managed timing. For
example, the timing is adjusted every month but the timing plan is still pre- Advanced computer-based control 8.0 percent
timed, not traffic actuated.

Interconnected, pre-timed signals with various forms of master control, such
as traffic-actuated control or manual control and pre-set various qualities of
timing plans.

Optimization of signal timing plans.

No change in hardware 12.0 percent

CMAQ Data Page 2 of 12

Buckeye-4

9/16/2021

Non-interconnected, pre-timed signals with old timing plan.

Optimization of Signal Timing Plans

7.5 percent

CMAQ Data

Page 3 of 12

Buckeye-4

9/16/2021

4. Intelligent Transportation Systems Project Data (For projects that involve the installation of fiber, networking equipment, CCTV cameras, etc.)

a. Enter the estimated weekday hourly traffic for the peak period (6-9 am and 2-6 pm) in vehicles/hour:

- 10 percent of weekday AADT will be used as a reasonable estimate (MAG will calculate the value) .

b. Enter the pre-project (current) average corridor peak period traffic speed:

c. Enter the pre-project (current) average corridor off-peak period traffic speed:

d. Enter the post-project percent increase in speed compared to the pre-project speed:

| 25

| 28

5. Signal Priority Projects - Transit Data

o

. Enter the pre-project (current) average corridor peak period traffic speed:

b. Enter the pre-project (current) average corridor off-peak period traffic speed:

c. Enter the pre-project average daily ridership:

d. Enter the number of instrumented buses during peak-hour:

e. Enter the number of instrumented buses during off-peak hour:

f. In the table, check the box that best describes the project (Check only one box):

Category

Before (pre-improvement) condition

After (post-improvement) condition

Expected increase in speed

Non-interconnected, pre-timed signals with old timing plan, no signal priority.

Coordinated time-of-day
operations. Adaptive Signal
Control. Transit signal priority
implemented.

25.0 percent

Interconnected, pre-timed signals with old timing plan, no signal priority.

Coordinated time-of-day
operations. Adaptive Signal
Control. Transit signal priority
implemented.

17.5 percent

Non-interconnected signals with traffic-actuated controllers, no signal
priority.

Coordinated time-of-day
operations. Adaptive Signal
Control. Transit signal priority
implemented.

16.0 percent

Interconnected, pre-timed signals with actively managed timing, no signal

Coordinated time-of-day
operations. Adaptive Signal

ae fe ei ee 8.0 percent
priority. Control. Transit signal priority
implemented.
Optimization of signal timing plans.
Interconnected, pre-timed signals with various forms of master control and P . g BP
. oe we . -, No change in hardware. Transit 12.0 percent
various qualities of timing plans, no signal priority. . ae
signal priority implemented.
Optimization of Signal Timing Plan.
Non-interconnected, pre-timed signals with old timing plan, no signal priority.] | Transit signal priority 7.5 percent

implemented.

CMAQ Data

Page 4 of 12

Buckeye-4 9/16/2021
6. Signal Preemption Projects - Emergency Vehicle
a. Enter the number of average weekday emergency vehicle trips: |
b. Enter the average emergency vehicle trip length in miles: ]
(average distance traveled by the emergency vehicle on each trip)
7. Flashing Yellow Signal Project
There are two methods that may be used to calculate the emission reductions. Please complete either the First Method or Second Method.
First Method: Estimation of Emission Reductions By Calculating Daily Delay Reduction
From From From From
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic

a. Enter the average weekday left turn volume in vehicles/day:

b. Enter the estimated peak hour left-turn volume in vehicles/hour:

c. Enter the average weekday through volume in vehicles/day:

d. Enter the estimated peak hour through volume in vehicles/hour:

e. Enter the number of left-turning lanes:

Arterial Class Il, Minor Collector)

g. Enter the truck percentage for the project area:

i. Enter the flashing yellow time of the project in seconds:

Second Method: Estimation of Emission Reductions Using Delay As Input

f. Enter the type of street (e.g. Principal Arterial Class |, Principal Arterial Class II, Minor Arterial Class 1, Minor

h. Enter the estimated existing delay per vehicle during peak hours in seconds/vehicle:

a. Enter the average delay reduced per weekday based on traffic modeling (vehicle hours per day):

CMAQ Data

Page 5 of 12

Buckeye-4 9/16/2021

ITS Project Information

Enter information in highlighted cells ONLY. Links to various websites are provided for additional information and help.

1. Project Title & Sponsor

a. Project Title Fiber Optic Backbone on MC 85 for a Traffic Management Center (TMC)
b. Lead Agency City of Buckeye
c. Other Partnering Agencies None

2. Project Type

SMO Buckets for the funding application Bucket #3 — Local Priority Corridors

3. Project Goals & Objectives

a. Project Goals Installing an ITS network in the City of Buckeye to be used as a backbone relative to the
the MAG/Buckeye ITS Stategic Plan (June 2017) to improve connectivity and improve
public safety challenges

b. Project Objectives Provide an ITS backbone for a Traffic Management Center (TMC) by installing Fiber
optic Cable from Eason Avenue & MC 85 to Miller Road (1st Street) and Monroe that
will ultimately be used to connect ITS equipment including CCTVs, vehicle detectors,
Pedestrian detectors, IT switches and Intelligent Controllers to an Intergrated
Transportation Magement System

4. Project Information

a. Project location description Eason Avenue & MC 85 to Miller Road (1st Street) & Monroe Road

Note: a PDF file of a map must be submitted to MAG as an attachment.

b. Scope of the project Install conduit, fiber, pull boxes, vaults and splices along MC 85 to connect the 5 traffic
signals along the corridor and establish an ITS backbone that conforms to the
requirements of the MAG/Buckeye ITS Strategic Plan for a Traffic Management Center.

c. Federal Functional Classification of the roadway section: | Principal Arterial - Other
Link to ADOT Functional Classification Maps

d. Total number of through lanes on the roadway section: | 4 ]

ITS Project Information Page 6 of 12

Buckeye-4 9/16/2021

5. Identify Project Components in MAG Regional ITS Architecture

Addressed in this
Service Area Project? Applicable ITS Service Packages
(Dropdown: Y/N)
Traffic Management Yes TMO7
Maintenance and Construction Yes TMO8
Public Transportation No
Traveler Information No
Emergency Management No
Archived Data Management No

NOTE: Insert the relevant ITS Architecture flow diagram in the "ITS Architecture" worksheet.

6. Quantitative Criteria

Enter Quantitative Criteria for Bucket(s) selected in Section 2 "Project Type"

Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) (MAG Will Complete) -
Crash Rate (MAG Will Complete) -
Maximum Peak Period Travel Time Index (MAG Will Complete) -
Regional Priority Corridor Ranking (Enter segment lengths in "Regional Priority - Top 200")
Percentage network communication connectivity to traffic signals & ITS devices. 100.00%
*Latest year of your agency's Operations/Management Center upgrade. 2003
*Filled in only for a "Bucket #3" project.

7. Program Year Preference

Preferred Program Year 2023

8. System Maintenance and Operations

a. Current staff resources available to support ITS operations at the local agency (in FTEs) [2
b. Additional staff resources required for fully utilizing features added by project (in FTEs) [1
c. Agency's estimated current annual ITS operations & maintenance (O & M) budget [_ $162,000 _|
d. Estimated additional annual O & M funds required for features added by this project [$81,000 |
e. Estimated DATE from when required additional local O & M funds will be available [07/2024 |

f. Other comments

9. Systems Engineering Analysis Requirement

Commitment to address the federal requirement for Systems Engineering Analysis:
Agency's intent to follow the process described in the 'V' diagram during the project development process.
ADOT Systems Engineering Checklist

The project sponsor/lead agency of this application intends to incorporate the Systems Engineering
Analysis in the project's scope of work, following guidance on the ADOT's System Engineering
Checklist.

Yes, the agency intents to follow the
process.

ITS Project Information Page 7 of 12

Buckeye-4 9/16/2021

ITS Architecture Flow Diagram

All relevant ITS Architecture Flow Diagrams MUST be inserted below for the relevant ITS Service Packages addressed by the proposed ITS project. This is to
ensure that the project complies with the Regional ITS Architecture and meets a federal requirement for all federally funded ITS projects.

Find the relevant Service Packages addressed by the project in the MAG ITS Architecture (found in the link below). Copy and paste the graphic in the space
provided.

MAG Regional ITS Architecture

TMO7: Regional Traffic Management
AZTech C2C TMS Network

incident information — incident information
+ +

road network
conditions

road network conditions

device control request
+

device data
device status
incident information
+

seo road network conditions

request

device data
device status
+
incident
time signal control information. information

‘The planned and future flows are not necessarily |
‘being funded. They may reflect the desire fo have
the data ink rom ether or bath

conditions
This service 3s the
‘communication bebveen the AZTech SE
RADE system and are shown 3 bessuse ahaa

separate
‘some are existing and some are planned
oho

TM08: Traffic Incident Management System
Arizona DOT (TM to EM)

incident information
+
source deployment status
+

incident information
+
incident response
status
resource request
incident information
+
resource deployment status
+

resource request

incident information
+

incident response
status

incident information

for public ‘traffic images
+

road network
conditions emergency

emergency
dispatch requdispatch response
+ I

traffic images video surveillance
+

traffic information for

traffic detector

gece Emergency Vehicle
Arizona DPS
Vehicles

LEGEND

interface between ADOT TOC =
‘and Phoenix Fire
yonal Dispatch Center runs
through the AZTechRADS. user defined flow

ITS Architecture Page 8 of 12

Buckeye-4 9/16/2021
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
(Cost Estimates Are Required Regardless of Programming)
Location Description Fiber Optic Backbone on MC 85
REQUESTED PRO i 5 5 :
Peer ces inthe |_WorkDescrition Install conduit and Fiber and splice to Trafic Signal Cabinets and City Hall
Mac 1) Funding Source Local
Preferred Year to Program Work 2028
CCOST ESTIMATE FOR DESIGN units ‘quarry unir cost ToTAL USES FEDERALAID | FEDERAL Locat
“Toponraphie Suey is 7 1,000[ § 11,000.00 No z 7,000)
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING Project Assessment Report or Detailed Workplan is $ : No zi :
OesIGN (15% plans) ‘Systems Engineering Analysis (must address FHWA requirements) is 1 3,000] $ 3,000.00, No| 3,000
(Required for Budget) Federal Project Environmental Determination is $ - No. : :
HAZMAT is $ i No = =
‘SUBTOTAL ~ PRELIMINARY costs $14,000.00 > 74,000
Tight of Way Acquistion 1s $ z No z z
FINAL DESIGN Plans, Specifications, Cost Estimates, Bidding is z sooo] $___se,000.00 No = 30,000)
(30, 60, 95, 100% plans) Geotechnical Report is $ No
(Required for Budget) Drainage Report is $ - No. :
SWPPP 1s $ : No = =
‘SUBTOTAL ~ FINAL DESIGN COSTS $50,000.00 > 50,000
TOTAL PRELIMNARY | AND DESIGN COST AVAILABLE FOR PROGRAMMING $ 64,000.00 - 64,000
ea Optic Backbone on MCS fora Trafic Management Center (TMC)
PR Work Description Install conduit and Fiber and sf to Traffic Signal Cabinets and City Hall
Funding Source mag,
Preferred Year to Program Work 2028
COST ESTIMATE FOR PROCUREMENT unrrs ‘quantmy unit cost TOTAL Uses FEDERAL AID | FEDERAL LocaL
$ z Yes z
PROCUREMENT PROCUREMENT COSTS $ ves “|
$ Yes
$ Yes :
$ Yer ;
$ Yes
$ Yes 7
$ Yer ;
3 Yes
$ Yes ;
"TOTAL PROCUREMENT 3 = : :
Tocation Descration Optic Backbone on MCBS
REQUESTED P
(Eee eID Work Description Install conduit and Fiber and splice to Trafic Signal Cabinets and City Hall
Programmed in the MAG TIP) Funding Source CMAQ.
Preferred Year to Program Work 2028
COST ESTIMATE FOR CONSTRUCTION units ‘quant unr cost ToTAL USES FEDERALAID | FEDERAL Loca
Relocate 69 kv (+) Poles eA 5 Ye z
Urry ReLocarions Relocate/Underground 12 kv Tnes F $ 5 Yes ; >
(Required for Budget, Relocate/Underground rigation Canal uF $ Yes z
May be Of no Utilities) ‘SWG Relocations is $ Yes. _|
The cost of utlity relocation for the “Telephone/Cable TV Relocations is $ = Yes | ~
transportation project are eligible for federal aid|_ Upgrade Railroad Crossings s $ Yes ;
if the costs/ativities invioved are directly Other tities s $ Yes
related to the transportation project. Generally, | Gtner utilities 5 5 ra ;
burying overhead utities is cost ronibitve
SUBTOTAL - UTIUTY RELOCATION COSTS|_§
3D PVE, COBSTD DT 66102 (TRENCHED] 7 o 30] § Yes z
construction 3-2" PVC, COB STD DTL 66102 (DIRECTIONAL TRENCHED] Fr 2,200 sof $ Yes 703,720] 6270
(Required for Budget) (COB SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE (144 FIBERS) LF 7,200 als Yes. 27,158] 1,642
(COB NO.9 PULL BOX, STD DTL 65124 eA 7 5000] § Yes 33,005] 7,995
CconstRucTION (COB NO. 7E PULL BOX, STD DTL 66121 FA rT 1,000] Yer 15,088] 312
(COB FIBER OPTIC SPLICE CLOSURE fA 7 1.250] § Yes 8.251 499
(COB 6 COUNT BRANCH FIBER AND TERMINATION PANEL eA 7 2,000 § Yes 13,202 798
FIELD HARDENED FIBER ETHERNET SWITCH fA 7 6,000] § Yes 39,606] 7394
SC CONNECTORS fA 7 eof § Yes 396] 2a
s Yes 7
$ Yes :
$ Yes
3 Yer :
$ Yes :
$ Yes
‘SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION Cost] § 254,970.00 240,437 74533]
MOBILIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION costs. [CONTRACTOR MOBILIZATION (Typically 8% of construction cost) 20398|$§ 20,397.60 = 19.235 4163
|TRAFFIC CONTROL (0-8% of construction cost) 20398|$ 20,397.60 Yes 19,235| 3163
JCONSTRUCTION SURVEY 8. LAYOUT (Typically 1% of construction cost) 3,000] $ 3,000.00 ves 2,29 in
JCONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCIES (Typically 5% of construction cost) 12748] $ 12,748.50 Yes 12022 m7
JCONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION (Averaging 18% of construction cost) 45895|$ 45,898.60 Yes 43,279] 2,616
‘SUSTOTAL= MOBILIZATION & ADMINISTRATION COSTS| $102,438.30 95,599) 539
TOTAL UTILITIES, CONSTRUCTION AND MOBILIZATION FOR PROGRAMMING $ 357,408.30 337,036 20,372
Please entr"Yer if your ageneyis cried acepted by ADOT fr contruction Wo |
apot
review ADOT REVIEW FEE Tora Uses FEDERAL AID | FEDERAL Loca
Fee
ADOT Review Fees for Non Certification Accepted Agencies $ 30,000 No 7 30,000
I L 3 30,000) = 30,000
TOTAL COST ESTIMATE = 751,408 EDA 114372

Project Cost Estimate

Page 9 of 12

foaponsY

Py ZT 40 OT a8ed

aunjeusis 7g 3@3png

TZ0Z ‘QT aquiajdas *93ed

yaBeuey AQ NL

da|Bul)y Ja30y

WeN

Ky “hy saunyeugis

“Sulpuny jesapay 404 payoajas s! aloud ay} J! JUaLUNIOp YaZpnq Jo diL/diD JUaINd |ed0] s,AdUae JaquiawW OYA) Sulsosuods
24} UE Papnyout aq |IIM yafoud siy} 404 spuNy jed0] AY} JY} Pue B3a;dWOd pue azesNdIe Ss} UO!JeII|dde siy} Uy PaUeyUOD UOHeLUOJU! AY} Je} AyIpAad | ‘AAWeJUaSaIdaJ payeUsisap JO JOJeUYs|U|Wpe/JaSeuew s,U0!DIpsiin{ ayy sy

Jlewa eA DIN 03 quas sI 3ey3 Ado 4qq 43M pauueds pue pauls aq o| :asnjeusis

T20z/9T/6

wE'St sor'tsb $ | tce'ptt $  9€0'E€ $ 3809 [e101
‘%60°00T 000‘0E $ | Ooo'oe $|- $ aay mainay usIseg LOGY
%60°02 sor'tze $| eze'vs $ | se0'cee $ pawwesSoag e301,
5 5 5 eH
%L'S s0r'Lse $ |ece'or $ |oeo'cer $ DvD} F207 a5 pue syauiqen feudig 2yjed 04 204s pue saquy pue unpuoD [}e3SU) $8 DW uo auogypeg INO JaqH4| uoanaysuoD
‘4 7 eH
- i :
%0°00T lo00'v9 $ ooo’ $ $ e207 ¥202| 15 pue srouigeg eusis 2yjeuy 01 214s pue soqyy pue unpuod ers $8 DW Uo auogyeg 2ndO Jeqly 994 maINad LOGY Sapn|axa ‘u8}s3q
aueys [220° 1220, qunowly |e>% junowly |esapa. Cary | STR ry dt
Us 12901 1eyo4 ty [2907 PONE || Sree ||! cen wondyosag OM uonduioseq uone207 aseud
J9Vd JUNLVNOIS GNV 1L390Na
p-ohayong

Buckeye-4

9/16/2021

APPLICATION CHECKLIST
This check list is optional, but is included to facilitate applicant review and verification that all required fields in the form have been completed.
Contact Information Complete?
Contact Information Yes
CMAQ Data Complete?
1. Traffic Estimate and Roadway Characteristics Ves
2. Data Required for Calculating Estimated Emission Reductions (fill in applicable data field) Ves
ITS Project Information Complete?
Section 1 is complete ies
Section 2 is complete Ves
Section 3 is complete Yes
Section 4 is complete & a PDF file of map will be attached to the submittal to MAG Yes
Section 5 is complete & all relevant Architecture Flow Diagrams have been inserted in the worksheet Yes
Section 6 is complete Yes
Section 7 is complete Yes
Section 8 is complete es
Section 9 is complete Yes
ITS Architecture Flow Diagram Complete?
ITS Architecture Flow Diagram have been inserted Yes
Project Cost Estimate Worksheet Complete?
ITS Architecture Flow Diagram have been inserted Yes
Budget & Signature Page Complete?
Form is signed Ves
Name, title and date fields are completed Yes

Application Checklist Page 11 of 12

TIX” SLT Foxoyong :ouueyy wowindog
Iz0z/S1/6 eq

@

|
0 sco Sco 0

DAV UOSeY 0} PY IOI] Wo say soup]
pofolg SLI p - sAoyong

Ajssaadxa pue ovind2v aynjosqe sy! 0} se ‘p
<{jue.aest ou sayeut aime 4p on

ZV ‘JAIIONG

NQYY

1
A
i
H i
4
!

WH ANS [L}

BOO 180d

jooyss

bg
uoneis a4 (Q)
#7 |

Ayeaqry
801|0d

suonexouuy oAayong

y99[01d SLI y-ehayong | |

S8'SINIM

@ aAV-HINOs)3
a
o. e x
aS =] oO
1S = a
5 = Zz
BB pS o
| D
| Es
. on
a
gy =
3 NVAMNAD' + g
n
N
z ®
Oo &
i z a
ee
’ 2 S
Ss S. an
44 g >
‘AW/SOUNNOW 3
Zz
&
NV'NOSIGS‘S a
Zz g
7} Ss
3AV'NOSV3-4 =
| | :
@
Z
5 FAV-SYONVEYYN'S
ES @
D =,
=
wo
m
' aeearey.
Q
9
ea ge
a =/AV-NYSESVIVNOZINV-S4—=— a=
3 an
la,

ee ae EL ~~ ¢ aNrasva-mM———