PLZM-24-0064 - DCA Phase 2 - Presentation - CC20251021.pptx
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
5155 characters
Development Code Update – Phase 2 Case PLZM-24-0064 City Council October 21, 2025 Purpose and Goals • Phase 2 of modernizing the Development Code • Joint effort between City staff and consultant • Consistency with state and federal law and other City codes and standards • Updates to address recent challenges and new industry standards or terminology • Opportunities to clarify standards and streamline development process Phase 2 Focus Areas Uses Article 3 Signage Section 5.12 Development & Design Standards Article 5 Land Subdivisio n Article 6 Streamlini ng Article 8 Public Participation • Involvement and feedback from: oCity staff – multiple divisions and departments oPlanning and Zoning Commission oCity Council oMembers of public and development community oCommunity Advisory Committee (CAC) • One speaker expressed support during the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing on September 23, 2025 • Letter of support from Apex Clean Energy Timeline PHASE 2 KICK- OFF SUMMER 2024 CAC WORKSHOP 10/7/24 P&Z WORKSHOP 11/12/24 FIRST DRAFT TO CAC 12/6/24 COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1/21/25 COUNCIL WORKSHOP 3/4/25 LAST DRAFT TO CAC 7/8/25 HEARING PROCESS 2024 2025 Article 1 – General Provisions • New Section 1.8.A.1.a, Applications Following Pre-Application • Movement of Planned Area Development (PAD) procedural language from Section 1.8.2 to Section 8.6 • Clarifying edits to Section 1.9, Nonconformities Article 2 – Zoning Districts • Corrections to Table 2.1-1 for consistency with General Plan • Movement of Downtown Overlay District (DOD) language from Article 5 to Article 2, alongside other overlay districts • Removal of unutilized Single-Family Flex (SFF) District • Consolidation of Community Master Plan (CMP) District and PAD District – PAD only moving forward Article 3 – Use Regulations • Reorganized and modernized Table 3.1-1 (Uses) • New or updated use-specific standards: oMiddle housing (new) oBattery Energy Storage Systems or BESS (new) oWireless facilities (updated) oMarijuana uses (updated) oCar washes and mini-storage (updated) • Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) – HB2720 • Backyard fowl (A.R.S. § 9-462.12) BESS example Detached ADU example Article 4 – Dimensional Standards • Agricultural (AG) District added to Table 4.1-1, Rural and Residential Districts • Revised residential dimensional standards to accommodate wider variety of housing types, including middle housing • Removal of lot coverage requirements (except AG/R1-43) Examples of middle housing Article 5 – Sections 5.1-5.11 and 5.13 • Modified garage dominance language • Additional or clarified design standards for middle housing, bungalow communities, and traditional multi-family • New “big box” (large format retail) standards • Revised commercial and industrial design standards • Expanded landscaping and lighting standards DSAP l d ti “Big box” example BTR community example Article 5 – Section 5.12, Signs • Rewritten for Reed v. Gilbert (content neutrality) compliance • New Table 5.12-1 clarifying signage by zoning district • Expanded Comprehensive Sign Plan (CSP) process • Digital billboards on future SR-30 New measurement guidance Internal illumination Yard Sign Type III example Blade sign example Article 6 – Land Subdivision • Updated subdivision terminology and design standards oBlock lengths with open space oT-intersection conditions Open space connection example • Less burdensome financial assurances process • Clarified references to Engineering Design Standards T-intersection with landscape tract Article 7 – Review and Decision- Making Bodies • Removal of redundant language found elsewhere in City Code or procedure • Removal of Section 7.7, Hearing Officer oUnnecessary – not a separate position created oDelegating authority to hear variances to Planning and Zoning Commission Article 8 – Review and Approval Procedures • Procedural changes required by HB2447 oSite Plans and Subdivisions now fully Administrative • Approval criteria for each entitlement type • New Section 8.10, Design Review • Rewritten appeals and rehearing or reconsideration of decisions language (Section 8.14) Article 9 – Enforcement • Updated in Phase 1 • No substantive edits in Phase 2 (stylistic and streamlining edits) Article 10 – Definitions • New definitions not specific to uses • Note “Zoning Administrator” definition • Removal of definitions that do not appear elsewhere in the Development Code • Creation of new Section 10.4, Definitions of Signs Appendices A, B, and C • Modified obsolete district development standards (Appendix B) consistent with Article 4 edits • Modifications to obsolete district uses (Appendix C) • Homes in Special Use (SU) District in Downtown Overlay District Analysis • Proposed DCA benefits: oImproved customer service oModernized requirements oImproved and clarified procedural language oAttractive, high-quality projects • No outstanding issues from reviewing departments and divisions • Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval Recommendation • Conduct a public hearing • Adopt Ordinance No. 28-25