Buckeye Parks & Recreation Master Plan Executive Summary Final 5-5-2025 Reduced.pdf
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
52658 characters
May 2025
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CONTENTS
01
INTRODUCTION
AND GOALS
02
PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT
03
DEMOGRAPHICS AND
TRENDS ASSESSMENTS
04
COMMUNITY NEEDS
AND OUTREACH
05
ANALYSIS AND
RECCOMMENDATIONS
06
THEMES
07
VISIONARY PROJECTS
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
2
Table of Contents
3
Goals of the Plan:
The master plan enables the City to engage in a public process to ensure future
parks, recreation, open space, and trails priorities and goals meet the evolving
demands of the Buckeye community for the next 10+ years. To carry out this
mission, the plan has been organized around the following goals:
What is the Buckeye Parks
and Recreation Master Plan?
The Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan is a long-range
plan that identifies key initiatives, policies, and implementation
strategies to guide Buckeye’s Community Services Department
projects and services over the next 10+ years. The purpose of the
plan is to offer strategies, recommendations, and operational
guidelines that will allow the City to meet the needs of current
and future City of Buckeye residents.
Create a comprehensive and compelling vision and direction for Buckeye
Parks and Recreation
Propose various approaches for accommodating growth while keeping the
fiscal picture in balance
Strategically identify gaps and prioritize future improvements and
programming for Parks and Recreation
Understand potential partnership opportunities and funding options
Evaluate operations and maintenance practices with an aim to generate
long-term sustainability, efficiencies, and resilience benefits
Assess current and desired service levels to strategically approach
population growth sustainably as a department
The City of Buckeye is committed to providing high-quality parks and
recreation experiences to all residents while contributing to the economic
wellbeing of the City.
01
INTRODUCTION
AND GOALS
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
4
Introduction and Goals
5
Fiscal
Responsibility
A Safe and
Sustainable
Quality of Life
Economic
Growth
Innovative and
High Performing
Organization
Infrastructure
Alignment with the
Council’s Strategic Goals
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan’s
goals and recommendations align with the
Council’s Strategic Plan 2025-2028 and its
identified focus areas:
Alignment with Key Planning Documents
The City of Buckeye and other agency partners have completed recent and relevant planning efforts.
This plan’s goals and recommendations were formed in the context of the following planning documents:
• Imagine Buckeye: General Plan 2040 (2018)
• Buckeye in Motion Transportation Master Plan (2019)
• Buckeye Active Transportation Plan (2019)
• Buckeye Library Master Plan (2023)
• Buckeye Low Impact Development (LID) Manual (2023)
• White Tank Mountains Conservancy (WTMC) White Tank
Mountains Regional Connectivity Initiative (2024)
• Flood Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC) Sun
Valley Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Update (2023)
• FCDMC Buckeye ADMP
• Downtown Buckeye Specific Area Plan (2024)
• The Landing Specific Area Plan (ongoing)
• El Rio District Area Plan (2019)
• El Rio Trail Assessment Plan (2020)
• Central Arizona Conservation Alliance (CAZCA) Regional
Open Space Plan (2018)
Buckeye is committed to providing the best quality of life for our residents.
A place they can be proud of while raising a family, working close to home,
and enjoying our unique amenities.
– Council Strategic Plan
“
“
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
6
7
Introduction and Goals
02
PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT
Existing Parks and Recreation System
The Buckeye Parks and Recreation system is an integral part of the community, dedicated to enhancing the
quality of life for its residents through a variety of recreational facilities and programs. The system includes
numerous parks, trails, and open spaces designed to accommodate a wide range of programs and activities.
Pocket
Parks
Neighborhood
Park
Community
Parks
Regional/
Conservation
Park
6
1
2
1
Kell Park, Bayless Park, Serena
Park, 6th St Plaza Park, Benbow
Veterans Memorial Park,
Narramore Park
6.55 Total Acres
Town Park, Rec Center, Aquatic
Center, and Skate Park
7.39 Total Acres
Earl Edgar Park and Senior
Center, Sundance Park
93.75 Total Acres
Skyline Regional Park
Aquatics
Arts and
Culture
Special
Interest
Classes
Sports
Leagues
Parks
and
Trails
Special
Events
Programs
For All
Ages
Recreation
Center and
Senior Center
Department Overview
The Community Services Department is responsible for a number of diverse
offerings and elements. The department supports the following functions:
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
8
9
Parks and Recreation Department
Narramore Park
Bayless Park
Serena Park
6th St. Plaza Park
Kell Park & Library
Hassayampa River
Gila River
Town Park, Recreation Center
Aquatic Center & Museum
Sundance Recreation Center,
Coyote Library
Sundance Park
Earl Edgar Recreational Facility & Senior Center
Skyline Regional Park
White Tank Mountain
Regional Park
Sonoran Desert
National Monument
Joe Foss
Shooting Range
Buckeye Hills
Regional Park
Maricopa County
Maricopa County
City of Buckeye Park
System Map
Parks and Recreation Goals and Objectives
The Department maintains progress towards multiple goals
that directly link the provision of Parks and Recreation
services to overall community advancement. These include:
Offer comprehensive programs that satisfy varying age
levels, physical abilities, and special interests
Protect and preserve Buckeye’s parks, facilities, and open
space for long-term sustainability
Provide a variety of health and wellness programs that
promote and support personal health
Optimize financial and physical resources
Market the worth of the Department and services we offer
To help achieve these objectives, the Department provides
a broad range of recreation and leisure programming,
supported with dedicated spaces which includes
neighborhood and community parks, a signature regional
park, recreation centers, a Senior Center, a swimming pool,
and trails.
All programs and events are required to relate to, support,
or directly align with the Department’s priorities and goals
for the future, identified in the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan. The goals, objectives, and general directions set forth
in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and other
fundamental Department documents are brought into
action through this Plan.
Department Mission, Vision, Goals, and Objectives
The Department’s vision is simple and succinct: “We are vital to Buckeye being a desired community.” This vision, in
tandem with the Department’s mission of “enriching the quality of life and creating memorable experiences for all
generations,” is a core facet of this Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The Department is committed to remaining engaged
and informed of the needs and priorities of Buckeye residents and Parks and Recreation’s role in meeting those needs.
The following section highlights the Department’s mission, vision, goals, and objectives, which have been crucial in
shaping the Plan and will remain central to its implementation.
Core Values and Guiding Principles
The Department has identified six core values for continued programming success:
Embrace
the New
Lend a
Hand
Enjoy Our
Work
Do
Right
Find a
Way
Celebrate
Uniqueness
1
3
5
2
4
6
In tandem with the Department’s vision and mission, Buckeye utilizes these core values as strategic anchors
when setting operational and budgetary goals.
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
10
11
Parks and Recreation Department
Develop/expand adult fitness and wellness programming
Develop/expand additional sport courts
Expand outdoor adventure and nature-based programming
Develop a multi-generational recreation center for indoor
recreation opportunities
Develop/expand enrichment programs and classes for all ages
03
DEMOGRAPHICS AND
TRENDS ASSESSMENTS
Demographics Assessment
Buckeye is currently one of the fastest-growing cities in the United States. The city has experienced
tremendous growth over the past decade and is anticipated to continue this fast-paced trajectory.
Buckeye is unique, as it is home to many large master planned communities which present a myriad of
opportunities for partnership with the private development community. The city and its partners need
to grow Buckeye’s parks and recreation system in order to meet current and future resident demands.
Population
• 2024 Population:
119,110
• Annual growth
rate: 7.10%
• Total Households:
34,663
Age
• Median age: 34.5
• Largest age
segment: 35-54
• Continued growth
of 0-17 population
through 2038
Race and
Ethnicity
• 57% White Alone
• 7% Black or
African American
• 39% Hispanic/Latino
Income
• Median Household:
$91,360
• Per Capita: $35,674
• Continued
economic growth
through 2038
2024 Buckeye Population Demographics
Trends Assessment
A national and regional trends
analysis was conducted and
resulted in the following key
recommendations:
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
12
13
Demographics and Trends Assessments
To fully assess and best understand the needs and priorities of
residents within this large geographic area, this plan divided
the city into multiple planning areas. These planning areas
were used throughout the plan, including in the identification
of demographics and trends.
The estimated current population in
Buckeye is 119,110 and by 2039, the
estimated population will be 227,928.
119,110
227,928
Estimated
Population
by 2039
Estimated
Current
Population
Buckeye is Arizona’s largest
city geographically and is only
at 14% build-out.
14%
Build-out
Younger families are moving
to Buckeye. Amenities should
be designed to appeal to
an increasing middle-age
population while remaining
accessible for elderly and
young children.
North
Buckeye
Central
Buckeye
10
10
South
Buckeye
85
85
Sun Valley
Parkway
West
Buckeye
Historic
Buckeye
East
Buckeye
Sun Valley Pkwy
Palo verde Rd
Baseline Rd
Monroe Ave
Beloat Rd
Miller Rd
Verrado Wy
North Buckeye, Sun
Valley Parkway,
Central Buckeye,
and East Buckeye
are all projected
to experience
exponential growth
City of Buckeye
Planning Map
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
14
15
Demographics and Trends Assessments
04
COMMUNITY NEEDS
AND OUTREACH
Community Engagement
The community outreach and stakeholder engagement plan was tailored to provide Buckeye
residents with multiple ways to provide input and feedback throughout the entire planning
process. The outreach included:
• Community workshops
• Citywide special events
• Individual interviews with leadership
• Focus group meetings
• User group meetings
• Interactive project website
• Statistically Valid Survey
• Citywide Findings/Outcomes Presentations
Website
Surveys
Share Your
Big Idea
Focus Group/
Stakeholder Meeting
Participants
Pop-Up Event
Participants
Interactive Map
Comments
Statistically
Valid Surveys
524
1,068
20
63
248
1,068
134
325
Community
Outreach
Meeting Votes
Social
Media
The community involvement
underscores the vital role
that resident engagement
plays in the parks and recreation
system. Recognizing that the success
of the parks system hinges on the
active participation and input of the
community, the outreach program
provided several opportunities for the
community to provide meaningful input
at every stage of the planning and
implementation process.
Community Needs Assessments Findings
The following pages provide the outcomes from the community outreach for
programming and amenities for both citywide and specific planning areas.
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
16
17
Community Needs and Outreach
Nature Center
12
12
12
Outdoor Adventures
44
Indoor Ball Courts
88
Fishing Areas
10
10
10
Fitness & Exercise
22
Natural Preserves
66
Community Center
99
Aquatics/Pools
11
Splash Pads
55
Paved Multi-Use Paths
77
Multi-Use Paths
11
11
11
Art Performances
33
TOP 12 AMENITY NEEDS BASED ON STATISTICALLY VALID SURVEY
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
18
19
Community Needs and Outreach
Water Fitness Programs
12
12
12
Swim Lessons
10
10
10
Pop-Up Programs
99
Nature Programs
88
Family Programming
66
Arts Performances
55
Adult Sports
11
11
11
Educational Classes
77
Hobby/Interest
Classes
11
Fitness Programs
22
Arts Programs
44
Special Events/
Festivals
33
TOP 12 PROGRAM NEEDS BASED ON STATISTICALLY VALID SURVEY
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
20
21
21
Community Needs and Outreach
North
North
Buckeye
Buckeye
Central
Central
Buckeye
Buckeye
10
10
South
South
Buckeye
Buckeye
85
85
Sun Valley
Sun Valley
Parkway
Parkway
West
West
Buckeye
Buckeye
Historic
Historic
Buckeye
Buckeye
East
East
Buckeye
Buckeye
Sun Valley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
Palo verde Rd
Palo verde Rd
Baseline Rd
Baseline Rd
Monroe Ave
Monroe Ave
Beloat Rd
Beloat Rd
Miller Rd
Miller Rd
Verrado Wy
Verrado Wy
PLANNING AREAS
TOP 5 COMMUNITY NEEDS: PROGRAMS
North Buckeye
1. Art Programs
2. Fitness Classes
3. Nature/Environmental Classes
4. Adaptive Recreation Programs
5. Hobby/Interest Classes
West Buckeye
1. Art Performances
2. Hobby/Interest Classes
3. Performing Arts
4. Arts Programs
5. Water Fitness Classes
Historic Buckeye
1. Pickleball Lessons/Leagues
2. Educational Classes
3. Art Performances
4. Nature/Environmental Classes
5. Teen Programs
East Buckeye
1. Pickleball Lessons
2. Adult Sports
3. Hobby/Interest Classes
4. Art Performances
5. Water Fitness Classes
South Buckeye
1. Water Fitness Classes
2. Educational Classes
3. Hobby/Interest Classes
4. Intergenerational Programs
5. Nature/Environmental Classes
Central Buckeye
1. Pickleball Lessons/Leagues
2. Adult Sports
3. Hobby/Interest Classes
4. Fitness Classes
5. Educational Classes
Sun Valley Parkway
1. Art Programs
2. Hobby/Interest Classes
3. BMX/Biking
4. Pickleball Lessons/Leagues
5. Adult Sports
The City of Buckeye divided into multiple planning areas helps to understand the 1 to 1 correspondence
between community needs and planning areas.
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
22
23
Community Needs and Outreach
North
North
Buckeye
Buckeye
Central
Central
Buckeye
Buckeye
10
10
South
South
Buckeye
Buckeye
85
85
Sun Valley
Sun Valley
Parkway
Parkway
West
West
Buckeye
Buckeye
Historic
Historic
Buckeye
Buckeye
East
East
Buckeye
Buckeye
Sun Valley Pkwy
Sun Valley Pkwy
Palo verde Rd
Palo verde Rd
Baseline Rd
Baseline Rd
Monroe Ave
Monroe Ave
Beloat Rd
Beloat Rd
Miller Rd
Miller Rd
Verrado Wy
Verrado Wy
PLANNING AREAS
TOP 5 COMMUNITY NEEDS: AMENITIES
North Buckeye
1. Indoor Exercise Facilities
2. Outdoor Exercise Equipment
3. Aquatics/Pool Facilities
4. Outdoor Fitness Exercise Facilities
5. Recreation Center
West Buckeye
1. Indoor Walking/Running Track
2. Aquatics/Pool Facilities
3. Indoor Fitness Exercise Facilities
4. Outdoor Exercise Equipment
5. Pickleball Courts
Historic Buckeye
1. Pickleball Courts
2. Indoor Walking/Running Track
3. Indoor Fitness Exercise Facilities
4. Outdoor Exercise Equipment
5. Disc Golf Course
East Buckeye
1. Pickleball Courts
2. Aquatics/Pool Facilities
3. Indoor Fitness Exercise Facilities
4. Recreation Center
5. Indoor Walking/Running Track
South Buckeye
1. Aquatic/Pool Facilities
2. Outdoor Exercise Equipment
3. Indoor Walking/Running Track
4. Outdoor Fitness Exercise Facilities
5. Multi-Use Paths and Trails
Central Buckeye
1. Indoor Walking/Running Track
2. Aquatics/Pool Facilities
3. Pickleball Courts
4. Indoor Fitness Exercise Facilities
5. Outdoor Fitness Exercise Facilities
Sun Valley Parkway
1. Aquatics/Pool Facilities
2. Indoor Fitness Facilities
3. Pickleball Courts
4. Outdoor Fitness Exercise Facilities
5. E-Sports Room
The City of Buckeye divided into multiple planning areas helps to understand the 1 to 1 correspondence
between community needs and planning areas.
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
24
25
Community Needs and Outreach
05
ANALYSIS AND
RECCOMMENDATIONS
Total Developed Park Acreage per 1,000 Residents
The following table provides the benchmarking totals for the levels of service provided for developed
parks per 1,000 residents.
Total Indoor Recreation and Outdoor Aquatics Square Footage per 1,000 Residents
The following table provides benchmarking totals for indoor recreation facilities and aquatic facilities.
Agency
Number
of Indoor
Recreation
Facilities
Total Indoor
Recreation
Facilities Square
Footage
Number of
Outdoor Aquatic
Centers/Pools
Total Outdoor
Aquatic Center/
Pool Square
Footage
Indoor
Recreation
Square Footage
Per 1,000
Residents
Outdoor Aquatic
Centers Square
Feet Per 1,000
Residents
Avondale Parks and Recreation
2
90,500.00
1
16,944.00
947.55
177.41
Boulder Parks and Recreation
3
150,950.00
5
121,104.00
1,394.46
1,118.74
Buckeye Community Services
3
22,345.00
1
7,500.00
187.60
62.97
Casa Grande Parks and Recreation
3
100,200.00
1
11,967.00
1.496.00
178.75
Glendale Parks and Recreation
5
121,648.00
2
24,176.00
482.47
95.88
Goodyear Parks and Recreation
2
50,000.00
2
105,910.00
448.40
949.80
Peoria Parks and Recreation
1
42,000.00
3
40,156.00
210.61
110.32
Benchmarking Indoor Recreation
Facilities and Aquatics Facilities
Comparative Analysis Findings
The City conducted benchmarking analysis that included
seeking information from representative municipalities to
determine whether the City adequately provides municipal
parks for residents to use. The representative municipal
agencies included: Boulder Parks and Recreation, Casa
Grande Parks and Recreation, Glendale Parks and Recreation,
Goodyear Parks and Recreation, Avondale Parks and
Recreation, and Peoria Parks and Recreation.
Agency
Population
Total Acreage of
Developed Parks
Less 2 Acres
Total Acreage of
Developed Parks
3 - 15 Acres
Total Acreage of
Developed Parks
16-50 Acres
Total Acreage of
Developed Parks
over 51 Acres
Total Developed
Acres/1,000
Residents*
Avondale Parks and Recreation
95,509
3.9
26.2
42.8
134.1
2.2
Boulder Parks and Recreation
108,250
28.35
169.1
236.49
423.53
7.92
Buckeye Community Services
119,110
6.55
1.09
Casa Grande Parks and Recreation
66,949
10.78
70.5
76.7
535
10.00
Glendale Parks and Recreation
252,136
6.3
318
100.4
537.1
3.81
Goodyear Parks and Recreation
111,508
4
53
190
0
2.22
Peoria Parks and Recreation
199,424
0
237.56
61.68
349.75
3.25
*Note: Does not include special use areas.
Benchmarking Developed Park
Acrea / 1,000 Residents
Buckeye is significantly behind when compared to benchmark cities in:
Developed Park Acreage
Indoor Recreation Square Footage
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
26
27
Analysis and Reccommendations
7.39
47.75
68
Desired Level of Service for Amenities and Parks
Since the 2016 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, the city has more than doubled in population
from 57,000 residents to 119,110 residents. Currently, the city provides 1.09 acres of parks per 1,000
residents. To determine Buckeye’s desired level of service standar ds, the City used information
gleaned from the survey issued to the jurisdictions in Maricopa County on the number of park acres,
facilities and amenities. In addition, the city gathered information from the National Recreation
and Parks Association. The following table provides a comparison of level of services amongst the
benchmarking cities as well as the other agency findings.
Desired Level of Service Comparison Matrix
Amenity
City of Buckeye
Existing
Level of Service
Valley-Wide
Average Level
of Service*
Benchmarking
Valley-Wide
Median Level
of Service*
National
Recreation
and Parks
Association**
City of Buckeye
Desired
Level of Service
Multi-Use Diamond Fields
1 Per 14,889
Residents
1 Per 8,000
Residents
1 Per 16,873
Residents
1 Per 6,821
Residents
1 Per 12,000
Residents
Multi-Use Fields
1 Per 17,015
Residents
1 Per 13,000
Residents
1 Per 13,471
Residents
1 Per 7.375
Residents
1 Per 13,000
Residents
Outdoor Basketball Court
1 Per 17,015
Residents***
1 Per 10,000
Residents
1 Per 10,029
Residents
1 Per 9,643
Residents
1 Per 10,000
Residents
Outdoor Pickleball Court
0
1 Per 8,300
Residents
1 Per 19,826
Residents
1 Per 20,244
Residents
1 Per 10,000
Residents
Outdoor Tennis Court
0
1 Per 8,300
Residents
1 Per 11,885
Residents
1 Per 8,731
Residents
1 Per 10,000
Residents
Outdoor Sand Volleyball
Court
1 Per 29,777
Residents
1 Per 8,300
Residents
1 Per 24,597
Residents
1 Per 46,517
Residents
1 Per 10,000
Residents
Playgrounds
1 Per 19,852
Residents
1 Per 8,000
Residents
1 Per 13,276
Residents
1 Per 5,016
Residents
1 Per 8,000
Residents
Ramadas
1 Per 4,107
Residents
1 Per 4,000
Residents
1 Per 7,407
Residents
N/A
1 Per 4,000
Residents
Swimming Pools
1 Per 119,110
Residents
1 Per 46,000
Residents
1 Per 111,780
Residents
1 Per 65,697
Residents
1 Per 50,000
Residents
Recreation Center/
Multi-Generational Center/
Community Center
1 Per 39,703
Residents
1 Per 50,500
Residents
1 Per 62.000
Residents
1 Per 57,750
Residents
1 Per 50,000
Residents
Dog Park
1 Per 119,110
Residents
1 per 91,000
Residents
1 Per 90,760
Residents
N/A
1 Per 30,000
Residents
Park Acres
1.09 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
3.8 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
3.7 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
7 Acres Per 1,000
Population
4 Acres Per 1,000
Residents
*From 2022 City of Chandler Parks and Recreation Master Plan
**From NRPA Performance Review Report
*** Includes the 3 courts at 6th Street Plaza
Master Planned Communities / HOAs
Buckeye is comprised of several master planned communities which include HOA developed
parks. The following table compares similar valley cites and the total developed park acreage
for both agency and HOA parks. Each of these agencies utilize both City and HOA developed
park acreage when defining the current level of service for developed park acreage per 1,000
residents. The table provides a comparison of the current and recommended service levels for
developed park acreage per 1,000 residents.
Developed Park Acreage - City and HOA Parks
Agency
City
Inventory
(Acres)
HOA/Other
Inventory
(Acres)
Total
Inventory
(Acres)
Current %
of Inventory
Provided By
City
Current Level
of Service
Recommended
Service Levels
Casa Grande
693
551
1,244
56%
22.1 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
19 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
Chandler
1,486
801
2,287
65%
8.2 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
8.5 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
Goodyear
254
449
703
36%
6.6 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
8.8 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
Buckeye
129
508
637
20%
5.3 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
8 Acres Per
1,000 Residents
Buckeye Developed Park Level of Service Projections
1.60
2.15
2.75
3.35
4.00
2024
2034
2039
2044**
2054**
209
63
225
275
339
LOS = Acres/1,000 Total Additional Acres*
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
0
100
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Acres per/1,000 Residents
Additional Acres
* Based on current inventory
** Notes: Uses 2039 Projected Population
200
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
28
29
Analysis and Reccommendations
Recreation Program Plan Strategies
The following identified Program Strategies are important for the Department to consider moving forward. These strategies
will act as a guide for the implementation of this plan and the improvement of the Department. These strategies, as a
result, should be updated and utilized by staff to implement and track progress on this Recreation Programming Plan’s
recommendations.
Recreation Programs and Services Strategies
Short-Term Strategies
Develop new programs that residents have identified as a need within fitness, hobbies and special interests, and special
events. Specific program areas noted as “High Priority” in the Statistically Valid Survey included hobby and interest classes,
fitness programs, community special events and festivals, art programming, family programming, educational classes and
lectures, and nature programs.
Develop a program that follows a decision matrix to assess new opportunities incorporating (at a minimum) local trends,
community interest/need, cost recovery goals, and age segment and population segment served by location among other
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
Further develop the gap mapping for programs and locations to include overlaying similar provider locations onto program
maps for a more detailed perspective.
Begin to address gaps in programming identified within the program mapping.
Enhance and optimize the Department’s marketing strategy for all programming. According to the community survey, 61%
of respondents preferred the Eye on Buckeye publication and 43% preferred social media as their methods of learning about
programming. With this information, and the everchanging preferred methods of communication, the Department should
stay vigilant in understanding how their residents and participants can best be reached.
Ongoing Implementations
The Department should evaluate Core Program Areas and individual programs, ideally on an annual basis, to ensure
offerings are relevant to evolving demographics and trends in the local community.
Staff should continue to monitor the effectiveness of the various pricing strategies they employ and adjust as necessary. It is
also important to regularly monitor for local competitors and other similar service providers as an increase in competition
may alter program pricing.
Continue to monitor demographic shifts and program offerings to ensure that the needs of each age group are being
met. It would be best practice to establish a plan including what age segment to target, establish messaging, identify
which marketing method(s) to utilize, create a social media campaign, and determine what to measure for success before
allocating resources towards a particular effort.
Complete a Program Lifecycle Analysis on a regular basis and ensure that the percentage distribution closely aligns with
desired performance. Include annual performance measures for each Core Program Area to track participation growth,
customer retention, and percentage of new programs as an incentive for innovation and alignment with community trends.
Organization Structure Assessment
Staffing
When comparing staffing in Buckeye to other parks and recreation agencies in the region of central Arizona and Boulder
Colorado, similar results emerge. Buckeye falls below the median of other agencies and, excluding seasonal employees,
actually ranks among the lowest staffing levels per 10,000 residents of the agencies evaluated. This data is illustrated in
the tables below. *Only Parks and Recreation FTE’s are included in the data below.
Agency
Population
Total Full-time
Equivalents (FTEs)
Total FTEs per
10,000 Residents
Boulder Parks and Recreation
108,250
358.45
33.11
Goodyear Parks and Recreation
111,508
167.1
14.99
Buckeye Community Services
119,110
94.3
7.92
Peoria Parks and Recreation
199,424
150.1
7.53
Avondale Parks and Recreation
95,509
41.8
4.38
Glendale Parks and Recreation
252,136
103.8
4.12
NRPA Median for agencies serving 100,000 to 250,000: 120.0 Total FTEs, 7.9 FTEs per 10,000 residents
With Seasonal Employees
Agency
Population
Total Full-time
Equivalents (FTEs)
Total FTEs per
10,000 Residents
Boulder Parks and Recreation
108,250
358.45
33.11
Goodyear Parks and Recreation
111,508
167.1
14.99
Peoria Parks and Recreation
199,424
150.1
7.53
Buckeye Community Services
119,110
66.8
5.60
Avondale Parks and Recreation
95,509
41.8
4.38
Glendale Parks and Recreation
252,136
103.8
4.12
NRPA Median for agencies serving 100,000 to 250,000: 120.0 Total FTEs, 7.9 FTEs per 10,000 residents
Without Seasonal Employees
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
30
31
Analysis and Reccommendations
In terms of full-time equivalents comparison with the other benchmark cities, Buckeye is fourth out
of the seven benchmark cities when looking at FTEs with season employees. In terms of acres of
developed parks, both Buckeye and Goodyear have 1.5 acres per FTE. When comparing FTEs without
seasonal employees, Buckeye is second lowest out of the seven benchmark cities with only Glendale
providing fewer number of FTE per 10,000 residents. Buckeye is below the NRPA FTE per 10,000
residents which is 7.9 compared to Buckeye’s 4.28 FTE without seasonal employees.
Strategic Hires
• Community Research and Data Management Specialist
• Asset Management/Logistics Specialist
• Business Analyst
• Volunteer Program Manager
• Communications and Community Engagement Coordinator
Additional Staffing
• Specialized/certified maintenance staff
• Front-line staff and maintenance crew leaders
Ad
ti
i
t ff
Modernize Employment Practices and Support
• Improve job descriptions with greater specificity and modern terminology
• Develop and manage a consistent and thorough on-boarding process for new
or transferred employees
• Develop a formalized training program for all divisions of the Department
• Complete “career mapping” for each position within the Department to identify
logical growth opportunities
• Develop a formalized incentive program aligned with Department
performance objectives
Staffing Recommendations
There is already a very strong culture of “partnership”
within the city and especially within the Community Services
Department. The City relies heavily on other organizations,
entities, agencies, and individuals to serve the residents of
Buckeye in an operationally efficient manner. It is expected
this practice will continue and grow in the years to come.
Even with this strong commitment to partnerships to
leverage the staffing needs of the city, improvements can
be made for parks and recreation to elevate the high quality
of this public service. Based on a thorough assessment of
existing staffing in the Department as well as best practice
findings from similar agencies both regionally and nationally,
the following recommendations were developed to improve
efficacy of parks and recreation in Buckeye as a progressive
and resilient public service.
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
32
33
Analysis and Reccommendations
06
THEMES
Based on what we heard, the
following themes were identified
from the key recommendations.
CELEBRATE
OUR NATURAL
RESOURCES
• Explore partnership
opportunities for nature center
with organizations like Audubon
• Continue the investment in Rio
Reimagined
• Conduct a grant study on land
purchase opportunities
• Partner with FCDMC to maximize
green infrastructure drainage
solutions as the need develops
Based on what we heard the following themes were identified based on key recommendations.
*Based on statistically-valid survey
Most Supported Key Recommendations
We’re unique in a lot of ways and the
biggest is all of the open space we
have. Would like to see the City buy
the land adjacent to the White Tanks
to ensure its preservation.
“
“
Have done a good job at preserving
and protecting wildlife corridors
with the White Tanks Conservancy.
Making sure that is not an
afterthought and it’s an upfront
priority is important as development
continues to occur.
“
“
73%
Of Residents Support Dedicated
Funding Options that Enable the
Preservation of Open Spaces and
Development of Parks and Trails*
87%
Of Residents Support Preserving
Open Space and High-Value Natural
Resources*
What We Heard
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
34
35
Themes
ENHANCE
COMMUNITY
CONNECTIVITY
• Create a trail connection
between Skyline and
White Tank Mountains
Regional Parks
• Add a trailhead to the west
side of Skyline Regional Park
• Connect rivers to ridges in
the City
• Create a ten-year Arts and
Culture Plan
I would like to see trails that
connect. Trails that go beyond the
immediate community.
“
“
There are some groups that
aren’t as fluent on social media as
others. Communication needs to
be a combination of tried-and-
true communication like mailings
mixed with social media and more
technology-based solutions.
“
“
Most Supported Key Recommendations
#1
Resident
Need is
Special
Events and Festivals*
79%
Of Residents Support Development
of Multi-Use Paths and Trails*
GROW A WELL-
DISTRIBUTED PARKS
SYSTEM
• Create a shared-use performing
arts space
• Work with developers on
opportunities to construct parks in
master planned communities that
could be conveyed to the city
• Partner and co-locate future
schools with land for a community
park, recreation center, and
aquatics facility
• Master plan and build
multi-generational center
and aquatics facility
Most Supported Key Recommendations
We need a more centralized aquatic
center/rec center. Buckeye is so
large and driving out to the current
center is too far.
“
“
I would love to see a Buckeye
sports complex that can provide
year-round sports opportunities
and host tournaments.
“
“
80%
Of Residents Support Identifying
and Acquiring Land to Develop
More City Parks*
84%
Of Residents Support Developing
New Indoor Recreation Facilities
What We Heard
What We Heard
*Based on statistically-valid survey
*based on statistically valid survey
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
36
37
Themes
Special Events and Festivals
•
• Add 10+ pickleball courts to
Sundance Park
• Implement park ranger program
• Implement formal volunteer
program
• Create a gateway on the Monroe
Avenue realignment near Town
Park, study connection options
between 6th Street Plaza and City
Hall for events
REINVEST IN
EXISTING ASSETS
Most Supported Key Recommendations
*based on statistically valid survey
I wish there were more shaded play
areas and large shade trees in the
parks.
“
“
Please invest in the communities in
the far west and historic Buckeye
areas. We have no close recreation
areas and the park areas available
to us lack amenities.
“
“
73%
of Residents Support Improving the
Existing Aquatics Facility*
81%
of Residents Support Investment in
Updating and Improving City Parks*
STRATEGICALLY
PROVIDE PROGRAMMING
OPPORTUNITIES
• Partner with HOAs to host special
events in various areas throughout
the city
• Assess partnership opportunities
to expand nature based education
programs
• Provide adaptive recreation
programming for all ages
• Explore opportunities to provide
recreation programming in master
planned communities
Most Supported Key Recommendations
Our biggest challenge is that there
is no indoor space for additional
programs.
“
“
Please consider additional art
classes for those of us who don’t
live in a 55+ community.
“
“
#1
Hobby and
Interest
Classes is the Top
Programming Priority
for Residents
71%
Of Residents Identify Hobby
and Interest Classes as a Need
What We Heard
What We Heard
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
38
39
Themes
07
VISIONARY PROJECTS
Amber Lasso
The vision for the “Amber Lasso” is to develop a nature-based
regional trail providing passage to the Rivers to Ridges areas
and connecting the existing natural and cultural assets.
The Amber Lasso is a looped trail alignment that includes a
southern and northern perimeter loop with Skyline Regional
Park at the central core of the two loops. The two irrigation
canals (RID and BWCDD) provide east/west connections
within the southern loop of the Amber Lasso as well. Several
additional primary pathway connections from the Amber
Lasso include north/south connections with Watson Road
and Miller Road which provide connectivity to Skyline
Regional Park, Sundance Park, Earl Edgar Park, and the
Gila River.
The Amber Lasso alignment utilizes existing pathways and
corridors that include Lost Creek Trail in Verrado, Maricopa
Trail, El Rio corridor, and the Hassyampa corridor. Key initial
recommendations include an Amber Lasso site specific
trail master plan to further define the trail alignment,
create branding identity and signage standards, explore
partnerships, and identify grant opportunities.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")")")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
%
&
'
(
10
Skyline
Regional Park
Estrella
Mountain
Regional Park
Gila River
Buckeye Irrigation Distict Canal
Roosevelt Ir
riga
tion
Distict
Ca
nal
BETHANY HOME RD
CAMELBACK RD
INDIAN SCHOOL RD
THOMAS RD
MCDOWELL RD
VAN BUREN ST
YUMA RD
LOWER BUCKEYE RD
BROADWAY RD
SOUTHERN AVE
BASELINE RD
BELOAT RD
ELLIOT RD
NARRAMORE RD
RAY RD
PERRYVILLE RD
JACKRABBIT TRL
VERRADO WAY
DEAN RD
RAINBOW RD
WATSON RD
APACHE RD
MILLER RD
ROOKS RD
TURNER RD
WILSON AVE
PALO VERDE RD
BRUNER RD
JOHNSON RD
315TH AVE
319TH AVE
GLENDALE
GOODYEAR
MARICOPA
COUNTY
WEST
EAST
WEST
WEST
WEST
EAST
E/N OF
CANAL
NORTH
S OF CANAL
W OF
CHANNEL
N OF CHANNEL
S OF CHANNEL
E OF RIVER
E OF RIVER
E OF RIVER
E OF RIVER
E OF RIVER
E OF RIVER
N OF CANAL
EAST
EAST
EAST
WEST
EAST
EAST
S OF ROAD
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
SOUTH
NORTH
T
S
E
W
T
S
E
W
T
S
E
W
SOUTH
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan - Trails
Buckeye Planning Area
Maricopa County Regional Parks
National Monument
FEMA Floodway
City Parks
40 Acre Trailhead Parcel
Wildlife Linkage
Habitat Patch
Maricopa Trail
Maricopa County Trails
City of Surprise Trails
City of Goodyear Trails
!
!
!
!
! Jurisdictions
")
Crossing
Parks Master Plan Trailhead
Major Trailhead
Minor Trailhead
City of Buckeye Trails
Proposed City of Buckeye Trails
City of Buckeye Trails
Secondary Path
Primary Path - Existing Decomposed Granite
Primary Path - Existing Concrete Sidewalk
Primary Path - New without Full Corridor
Primary Path - New with Full Corridor
¨
0
2
4
1
Miles
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
40
41
Visionary Projects
Rivers to Ridges
Within the City of Buckeye’s municipal planning area lies a multitude of
existing natural and cultural assets, such as the Sonoran Desert National
Monument, White Tank Mountain Regional Park, Skyline Regional Park,
Buckeye Hills Regional Park, Robbins and Powers Butte Wildlife Areas, and
the Gila and Hassayampa rivers. Yet, these features exist as isolated assets
that should be integrated and connected by pathways and trails.
Primary paths should be constructed to connect the White Tank
Mountains to both the Gila and Hassayampa rivers. Similarly, the Buckeye
Hills and the Sonoran Desert National Monument are recommended to
be connected via primary paths where topography does not constrain the
path width or surface material. Major and minor trailheads are utilized for accessing the Rivers to Ridges Paths.
The Maricopa Trail and El Rio Trail are prime examples of the City’s proposed Rivers to Ridges trail along the Gila River. The
Maricopa Trail already has regional significance and connections to communities throughout the Valley. The El Rio has also
been identified as a regional pathway and trail corridor to provide connectivity to the neighboring cities of Goodyear and
Avondale to the east.
In 2016, the El Rio Design Guidelines and Planning Standards Master Plan was developed in a collaborative effort between
the cities of Buckeye, Avondale, and Goodyear; Maricopa County Planning and Development; and Flood Control District of
Maricopa County. The master plan provides a shared vision to continue to restore the Gila River and provide the county and
cities with a consistent design and planning standard to maintain the focus and increase awareness and appreciation of the
Gila River.
In 2020, Buckeye developed the El Rio Trail Assessment which provided an assessment of the El Rio corridor within the
jurisdictional limits of Buckeye. The plan evaluated alignment alternatives along the river and identified a preferred
alternative.
Municipal/Recreation Campus
The community has identified a need to provide more
indoor recreation space. The City has identified the
vision of developing a public municipal campus to
include a recreation center and aquatics facility with
other community facilities like libraries and public safety
facilities. This could become the model to provide a
municipal / recreation campus within or around the
City planning areas. Other valley cities such as Surprise,
Avondale, Glendale and Goodyear are utilizing this model
to create efficiencies with infrastructure and development
to provide access to community-based facilities within a
municipal campus setting. A recommendation from this
plan is for the City to conduct a feasibility assessment to
identify potential sites for a municipal campus.
Presence at the Landing
The Landing is a 2,100-acre (3.4 square mile) project site
located just south of I-10 and Verrado Way. It is a critical
growth area for Buckeye and offers an opportunity to
integrate an entertainment hub with unique and diverse
recreational and living opportunities. The Landing
also provides the city with another way to incorporate
recreational amenities and programming into the area.
The Landing project area includes the Flood Control District
of Maricopa County Flood Retaining Structure 4. This flood
retaining structure provides 100-year flood protection
for downstream landowners. The dam is maintained and
operated by the FCDMC with Arizona Department of Water
Resources (ADWR) as the regulating agency. This property
provides 205 acres of land use within the FCDMC flood
retaining structure. FCDMC is open for joint use recreation
opportunities and has several examples of this kind of
application throughout the Valley. FCDMC provides recreation
easements for the use of the land. Park development and
maintenance costs are the responsibility of the City. An
example of a similar use within a FCDMC facility is the City of
Phoenix’s Reach 11 sports complex. The Community Services
Department should continue to be involved during the
planning process to identify recreation opportunities and be
part of this diverse development.
The Landing Land Use Concept
Buckeye Parks and Recreation Master Plan | Executive Summary
42
43
Visionary Projects
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY