Extracted text (via pymupdf)
34813 characters
City Council Staff Report
Date
July 20, 2026
Case No.
ZON25-00110
Project Name
San Antonio Tire Shop Rezone
Request
Rezone 0.4+ acre from Office Commercial (OC) to Limited
Commercial with a Bonus Intensity Zone Overlay (LC-BIZ)
Site Plan Review for a 4,015 square foot Minor Automobile
Service and Repair development
Project Location
1609 West University Drive
Parcel No(s)
135-64-116
Project Area
0.4± acres
Council District
District 3
Existing Zoning
Office Commercial (OC)
General Plan
Designation
Urban Residential
Applicant
All Right Builders, Inc.
Owner
Tres Hermanos, LLC
Staff Planner
Emily Johnson, Planner II
Prop 207 Waiver
Signed?
Yes
[2]
Recommendation
Staff Recommendation:
Staff finds that the Proposed Project is consistent with the Mesa 2050 General Plan, the criteria
in Chapter 21 regarding Bonus Intensity Zone (BIZ) overlays, and the review criteria for Site Plan
Review outlined in Mesa Zoning Ordinance (MZO) Section 11-69-5.
Staff recommends approval with conditions.
Planning & Zoning Board Recommendation:
On June 10, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Board voted (7-0) to recommend that City Council
approve the proposed project with an additional condition of approval related to overflow parking.
Condition of approval No. 8 has been added below to address this concern.
Staff agrees with the additional condition of approval proposed by the Planning and Zoning Board.
Project Overview
Request:
The applicant is requesting approval for a rezoning for 0.4+ acre from OC to LC with a BIZ Overlay
and Site Plan Review for a 4,015 square foot minor automobile repair development (Proposed
Project).
Concurrent Applications:
Minor General Plan Amendment: Applicant has requested a Minor General Plan
Amendment for the 0.4+ acre project site from Urban Residential with an Evolve Growth
Strategy to Urban Center with an Evolve Growth Strategy. A public hearing was held by the
Planning and Zoning Board on May 13, 2026, at which the Board recommended approval
(GPA26-00111).
Site Context
General Plan:
The Placetype for the project site is currently Urban Residential and the Growth Strategy
is Evolve.
Convenience Services land use, which includes minor automotive/vehicle service and
repair facilities, is not identified as a principal or secondary land use in the Urban
Residential Placetype.
A Minor General Plan Amendment concurrent application has been submitted to change
the Placetype Designation from Urban Residential with an Evolve Growth Strategy to
Urban Center with an Evolve Growth Strategy.
[3]
o The purpose of the Urban Center Placetype is to create compact mixed-use areas
where many people live, work, and play and are typically located adjacent to transit
or major arterials.
o Urban Centers contain retail, personal services, public/semi-public uses,
entertainment and recreation facilities, eating and drinking establishments, and
convenience services.
o The Proposed Project is located on a corner site, fronting West University Drive, an
arterial roadway, across from other retail and convenience services is classified as
convenience services in the 2050 Mesa General.
The Proposed Project is consistent with the Urban Center Placetype and furthers the
implementation of, and is not contrary to, the Vision, Guiding Principles, Strategies, and
applicable elements of the Mesa 2050 General Plan.
Supporting General Plan Strategies:
o N2. Promote adaptive reuse and infill as tools to rejuvenate and revitalize established
neighborhoods.
o LU2. Create opportunities for placemaking in neighborhoods that reinforce their unique
character and sense of place.
o LU3. Encourage infill and redevelopment to meet the community’s strategic needs.
Sub-Area Plan:
The Proposed Project is located within the Neighborhood Opportunity Area of the West
Main Street Area Plan.
The purpose of the West Main Street Area Plan is to provide for the increased needs of the
community, and also to create a place that will continue to represent its people and
community. Elements of placemaking, including people and values, integrated land uses,
and street life, should be incorporated to enhance the sense of place.
The Proposed Project is consistent with the West Main Street Area Plan because it will
enhance the existing environment, build upon existing activities that enhance new
development by contributing to a mixed-use setting, and project the neighborhood identity
through an enhanced streetscape.
Zoning:
The project site is zoned Office Commercial (OC).
The applicant is requesting to rezone the site to Limited Commercial with a Bonus Intensity
Zone Overlay (LC-BIZ).
Minor Automobile Service and Repair is a permitted use within the LC District and is subject
to the additional development standards for Automobile, Vehicle Repair, Major and Minor
in Section 11-31-6.
[4]
Surrounding Zoning & Use Activity:
The Proposed Project is compatible with surrounding land uses, which include places of worship,
medical offices, motels, and vacant land.
Northwest
(Across University Dr.)
RS-6
Single Residential
North
(Across University Dr.)
LC
Commercial
Northeast
(Across University Dr.)
LC
Commercial
West
RS-6
Single Residential
Project Site
OC
Minor Automobile Service
and Repair
East
(Across Longmore)
LC
Minor Automobile Service and
Repair
Southwest
(Across Bedford St. Alley)
RS-6
Single Residential
South
(Across Bedford St. Alley)
RS-6
Single Residential
Southeast
(Across Longmore)
RM-4/RS-6
Place of Worship
Site History:
July 21, 1958: City Council annexed 706.3± acres, including the project site, into the City
of Mesa (Ordinance No. 358).
On May 17, 1982, City Council approved a rezoning of the 1.7 acres site north of the project
site, across West University Drive, from C-1 to C-2 (Case No. Z82-027, Ordinance No.
1597). This case shows the zoning on the proposed project site was C-1.
Project/Request Details
Site Plan:
Building Design:
o The 4,015 square foot Minor Automobile Service and Repair facility is a single-story
structure situated on the southern portion of the site.
o Along the north side of the building is the main entrance, bay doors, and a 320 square-
foot customer-waiting area with a pedestrian path, leading out to the public sidewalk
along University Drive, shaded by an existing canopy.
Access:
o The site currently has four driveways; two on University Drive and two along
Longmore.
o The Proposed Project includes closing the larger, northernmost driveway access on
Longmore and the easternmost driveway on University Drive.
[5]
o The remaining drive on University Drive will be entry only and the remaining drive on
Longmore exit only.
Parking:
o Per Table 11-32-3.A of the Mesa Zoning Ordinance (MZO), 11 parking spaces are
required.
o The applicant is proposing 4 parking spaces as part of the BIZ request.
o The Planning and Zoning Board acknowledged that the use has operated with 4
spaces without documented complaints but expressed concern about future
neighborhood impacts. In response, Condition of Approval No. 8 has been added.
o The legal parking requirement would remain 11 spaces, but the 4 proposed spaces
would be deemed sufficient unless the proposed project causes adverse
neighborhood parking impacts or vehicle queuing in a public roadway or on
neighboring property. If either occurs, the property owner must obtain approval for an
alternative parking arrangement, such as shared, off-site, or valet parking.
o Enforcement of adverse neighborhood parking impacts may be difficult because
members of the public are generally permitted to park lawfully on public streets, so
the concerns raised by the Board may not result in any vehicle citations. In addition,
it may be difficult to establish that a particular vehicle is associated with the proposed
project because any citation would ordinarily be issued to the vehicle owner rather
than the applicant or property owner. By contrast, roadway queuing is more readily
observed, documented, and linked to the project’s operations and therefore more
directly addresses the Board’s concerns regarding vehicle congestion.
Landscaping:
o Landscaped areas are located along the perimeter of the site as well as across the
sides and rear of the building.
o The applicants are requesting modifications to the landscaping requirements under
the BIZ request as described below.
Minor Automobile/Vehicle Service and Repair Requirements:
o The Minor Automobile Service and Repair land use has additional development
standards in Section 11-31-6 of the MZO.
o The minimum lot size of this use shall be one acre and auto service bays shall be
screened per Section 11-30-9(F).
o Because of the size of the existing lot and the orientation of the existing building, the
applicants are requesting modifications to these standards in the BIZ request.
The Proposed Project includes a new 40-inch-high CMU breeze block screen wall along
University Drive and Longmore to screening the parking areas as required per Section 11-
30-9(H), and litter and noise requirements will be met as outlined in the Good Neighbor
Policy.
[6]
Bonus Intensity Zone Overlay:
Per Section 11-21 of the MZO, the purpose of a BIZ Overlay is to provide for variation from the
application of residential densities and other development standards to allow greater intensity of
development and encourage unique, innovative developments of superior quality. The BIZ
Overlay must demonstrate that the resulting development will further the goals and objectives of
the General Plan, Specific Plans, and Council policies and will provide significant social or
economic benefits to the City.
Development Standards
MZO Required
BIZ Proposed
Minimum Building and Parking
Area Setbacks – MZO Table 11-
6-3.A
Front and Street-Facing Side
Interior Side and Rear: Adjacent
to RS District
15’
25’
10’ (east property line to
building)
14’ (east property line to
parking area)
23’ (west property line to
building)
5’ (west property line to
parking area)
22’ (south property line to
building)
Auto Service Bays – MZO
Section 11-30-9(F)(2)(d)
When bay doors are less
than 200 feet from an
adjacent street and the bay
doors are less than
perpendicular to a street,
screening shall be provided
at least 6’ high
3’ screen wall
Parking Areas – MZO Section
11-30-9(H)(7)
A setback of at least 10 feet
shall be provided between
the screen wall and the right-
of-way
0’
Automobile/Vehicle
Repair
–
MZO Section 11-31-6(A)
Minimum lot size is 1 acre,
unless part of a larger group
commercial center
0.4± acres
[7]
Development Standards
MZO Required
BIZ Proposed
Size of Parking Spaces and
Maneuvering Aisles
–
MZO
Section 11-32-2(J)
One-way drive aisles that do
not provide access to
parking or lading spaces
shall be at least 12-feet wide
11’
Required Parking Spaces by Use
– MZO Table 11-32.3.A
11 spaces
11 spaces (4 spaces may
conditionally satisfy
requirement per
Condition of Approval No.
8.)
Setback of Cross Drive Aisles –
MZO Section 11-32-4(A)
Parking spaces along main
drive aisles connecting
directly to a street and drive
aisles that cross such main
drive aisles shall be set back
at least 50 feet from the
property line abutting the
street
18’
Perimeter Landscaping – MZO
Table 11-6-3.A
Front and Street-Facing Sides (s
Landscaped According to Ch. 33)
15’
12’ (minimum north
property line)
11’ (minimum east
property line)
Required Number of Plants by
Street Type – MZO Table 11-33-
3.A.4
1 Tree and 6 Shrubs per 25
Linear Feet of Street Frontage
Two 36-inch box trees and
three 24-inch box trees
Two 36-inch box trees and
two 24-inch Ocotillo (east
property line)
[8]
Development Standards
MZO Required
BIZ Proposed
Required Landscape Yards –
MZO Section 11-33-3(B)(1)(a)(i)
Landscaping
for
Non-Single
Residence Uses Adjacent to
Single Residence Uses less than
5 Acres
20’
5’ (minimum west
property line)
6’ (minimum south
property line)
Landscape
Islands
–
MZO
Section 11-33-4(B)(2)
Landscape islands shall be a
minimum of 8’ wide and 15’
in length for single-row
parking
One island 3 feet wide
and 18 feet long
Landscape Island Plant Material
– MZO Section 11-33-4(D)(1)(a)
1 shade tree and 3 shrubs
shall be provided for every
15-foor parking island
0 trees
Foundation Base – MZO Section
11-33-5(A)
Exterior Walls with a Public
Entrance
Exterior Walls without a Public
Entrance,
not
Adjacent
to
Parking Stalls
15’
5’
5’ minimum (north
elevation)
4’ (west elevation)
0’ minimum (south
elevation)
Landscape Area in Foundation
Base – MZO Section 11-33-
5(B)(1)
1 Tree Per 50 Linear Feet or Less
of Exterior Wall Length
6 Trees
0 Trees
Plant Material Within Foundation
Base – MZO Section 11-33-
5(B)(3)(a)
Exterior Walls Visible from Public
Parking or ROW with Public
Entrances
33% Landscaped
0% (north elevation)
Per MZO Section 11-21-3(B), the City Council may approve modifications to the underlying district
standards proportionate to the number of items and degree of compliance for projects that comply
with a combination of the criteria for the BIZ. This includes a combination of either:
[9]
Criteria (1) Providing distinctive, superior quality designs (See Section 11-31-32,
Superior Design) and Criteria (2) Addressing environmental performance standards;
or
Criteria (1) Providing distinctive, superior quality designs (See Section 11-31-32,
Superior Design) and Criteria (3) Providing documented evidence that the
building(s) will meet or exceed nationally recognized environmental performance
standards. For purposes of this criterion, buildings that are designed to earn Green
Globes, LEED™ Silver, or to be in compliance with the International Green
Construction Code and/or equivalent third-party criteria, are considered to be
energy efficient and no higher standard shall be required.
Projects with fewer modifications will comply with a lower percentage of the criteria requirements
in their request for the BIZ Overlay. Projects with a higher number, and greater deviation from, the
adopted standards are required to comply with a higher percentage of criteria in their request for
the BIZ Overlay.
The following summarizes an evaluation of each criteria for the BIZ Overlay request.
1. Provide distinctive, superior quality designs. (See Section 11-31-32, Superior Design)
Per MZO Section 11-31-32, for a project to reflect Superior Design it will incorporate
all of the following elements:
A. Holistic Approach to Project Design. Varied, high-quality, regionally-appropriate
building materials, used in distinctive building forms, building massing and detailing
that result in a note-worthy example of holistic site design, architecture,
landscaping and signage; and
The Proposed Project incorporates high-quality, context appropriate
materials and architectural detailing that creates a cohesive and visually
distinctive development. The upgrades to the building, including a custom
mural and decorative CMU breeze block wall, contributes to an overall high-
quality project. The landscaping was designed to incorporate low-water-use
xerophytic species, including cacti and other arid-adapted plants, that
conserve resources while reflecting the site’s overall modernist, mid-century
design.
B. Responsive Approach to Site and Sub-Area Context. Architectural and
landscape architecture details and features that reflect the character defined in
Sub-Area Plans or the General Plan's Placetype urban design characteristics, that
are harmonious with adjacent development patterns, integrate with the physical
conditions of the immediate site, and create a unique sense of place; and
The Proposed Project reflects the existing development pattern along this
section of University Drive, which consists primarily of small-scale
commercial and some automotive service uses serving adjacent
neighborhoods. The proposed improvements, including the custom mural,
decorative CMU breeze block wall, desert landscaping, and improved
vehicular and pedestrian circulation, elevate the architectural and landscape
[10]
quality, contributing to a unique sense of place, while maintaining
compatibility with adjacent development.
C. Sustainable Design. Site design, architecture and landscaping features that
address the local climate to reduce summer sun penetration and provide summer
sunshade protection for pedestrians, promote energy and water conservation,
promote the preservation or creation of open space, provide for and encourage the
use of multiple modes of transportation, utilize existing infrastructure, and create
the opportunity for social interaction; and
The Proposed Project incorporates several features that respond to the
desert climate and promote pedestrian comfort and sustainability. The
existing canopy structure, which will be retained and painted a project
appropriate Blue Bauble color, will be used to create an open space for
customers to wait. It will provide shade coverage for the customer waiting
area outside of the building’s entrance and shade the pedestrian path that
leads out to the public sidewalk on W University Drive. The landscaping
emphasizes low-water-use species that are native and regionally adapted
reinforcing the desert character, enhancing biodiversity, and reducing
maintenance requirements.
D. Exceeds Standards. Provision of details and features that exceed the criteria and
standards specified in Sections 11-5-3, 11-5-5, 11-6-43, 11-6-4 (as applicable), 11-
7-3, 11-8-5, 11-8-6 and Chapters 30 through 34, where applicable; and
The Proposed Project exceeds the design objectives of the MZO by
providing a custom mural on the east elevation along Longmore, which is
not required by code, and by providing a highly decorative, breeze block
parking screen wall, both of which contribute to an enhanced overall look on
the project site. More than the required number of shrubs are also being
provided along both street frontages and include, but not limited to, a mix of
Octopus Agave, Organ Pipe, Parry’s Agave, and Golden Barrel Cactus.
E. Great Public Spaces. Details and features that create attractive, comfortable
environments for pedestrians; ensure safe, useful and well-integrated open or
public spaces; and include high quality amenities.
The Proposed Project includes well-designed open space that enhances the
pedestrian and customer experience. The existing canopy will provide year-
round shade and weather protection, and the addition of a 3-inch raised path
on site will contribute to a safe pedestrian experience. The closing of the
northernmost driveway out to Longmore and the easternmost along
University Drive will also allow for a safer, more organized, and usable
parking area, contributing to the overall comfort for visitors to the project
site.
Based on the above discussion, staff finds that the Proposed Project complies with
Criteria 1 required for approval of a BIZ overlay.
2. Address environmental performance standards outlined below:
[11]
a. Site selection criteria. Sites shall meet one or more of the following criteria.
i.
Redevelop and rehabilitate economically distressed properties (particularly
greyfield sites), damaged sites or environmentally contaminated ‘brownfield’ sites.
The Proposed Project represents the redevelopment and rehabilitation of an
aging commercial property, originally developed as a gas station. The
proposed investment revitalizes a long-standing commercial corner that has
experienced
physical
deterioration
and
through
the
proposed
improvements, will transform the property into a productive and attractive
neighborhood-serving business.
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria.
ii. Utilize areas with existing utility and transportation infrastructure and existing
community services. This criterion is preferred for higher density and higher
intensity development, when feasible.
The site has access to City of Mesa utilities and direct access to West
University Drive and North Longmore which include public sidewalks that
connect the proposed development to adjacent commercial developments
and residential neighborhoods.
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria.
iii. Utilize locations within ½ mile of a planned light rail line or ¼ mile from an existing
or planned bus stop. This criterion is preferred for higher density and higher
intensity development, when feasible.
The Proposed Project is not within ½ mile of a planned light rail line or ¼
mile from an existing or planned bus stop.
The Proposed Project does not meet this Criteria.
b. Site design criteria. Designing the site to facilitate alternative modes of transportation
and to reduce onsite environmental impacts.
i.
Provide safe and secure storage for bicycles. For commercial, employment or
institutional projects, bicycle storage areas shall be within 200 yards of the building
entrance and shall have a designated and convenient pedestrian access route
connecting the storage area to the building.
The Proposed Project provides safe and convenient bicycle parking,
allowing customers and employees to securely store bicycles within a short,
approximately 10 feet, and direct walking distance of the building entrance.
The storage is directly accessible from pedestrian path on site that lead to
both street frontages.
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria.
ii. Include priority location parking for low-emission vehicles in parking areas.
The Proposed Project does not include priority parking for low emission
vehicles.
The Proposed Project does not meet this Criteria.
[12]
iii. Provide priority location parking spaces for carpool or vanpool vehicles.
The proposed development does not identify priority parking locations for
carpool or vanpool vehicles on the site plan.
The Proposed Project does not meet this Criteria.
iv. Provide the number of parking spaces designed to serve a development site
consistent with the number of spaces required to meet the minimum parking ratio.
Parking spaces over the minimum number is discouraged.
Per Table 11-32-3A of the MZO, 11 parking spaces are required for the
proposed development. The site plan submitted shows 4 parking spaces
being provided on site. Based on the limited number of employees and the
operational details provided, the four parking spaces proposed will provide
adequate parking for employees and customers. The reduction in parking is
requested in this BIZ.
The Proposed Project does not meet this Criteria.
v. For greenfield sites, protect or restore natural areas on site with native vegetation
to encourage biodiversity and for enjoyment by people. For previously developed
sites, restore areas with native or adapted vegetation to encourage biodiversity
and for enjoyment by people. The size of the space should be appropriate for the
size of the site and the activity level or use of the site.
The current site, and many of the surrounding commercial sites, have
underutilized, minimally landscaped, or missing landscape areas. The
Proposed Project will redevelop existing landscape areas and create new,
enhanced landscape yards throughout the site. This includes closing in the
northernmost driveway along Longmore and the easternmost driveway
along University Drive to create a landscape area that defines the corner,
creating a landscape yard between the building and right-of-way along the
east elevation, and adding foundation base landscaping along the west and
south elevations where storage used to be.
The landscape plan incorporates low-water-use xerophytic species,
including cacti and other arid-adapted plants. The landscaping emphasizes
the preservation and integration of native and regionally adapted species
and existing native vegetation is preserved where feasible and
complemented by supplemental plantings selected to reinforce the desert
character, enhance biodiversity, and reduce maintenance requirements.
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria.
vi. Design the project to be energy efficient including, but not limited to, designed to
reduce summer heat gain, reduce winter heat loss, utilize day lighting strategies
and provide the opportunity for occupants to take advantage of renewable energy.
The design also mitigates the effects of solar exposure for users and pedestrians.
For purposes of this criterion, buildings that have efficient HVAC systems,
incorporate passive solar heating, cooling and day lighting strategies within an
efficient building envelope, as recommended by the Department of Energy's
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) section, including buildings
designed to earn the EPA ENERGY STAR or designed to meet LEED™ Silver or
[13]
equivalent third-party criteria are considered to be energy efficient and no higher
standard shall be used
The architectural design proposed includes shaded walkways and
pedestrian entries, which help to mitigate the effects of solar exposure for
employees and visitors to the site.
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria.
c. Provide documented evidence that the building(s) will meet or exceed nationally
recognized environmental performance standards. For purposes of this criterion,
buildings that are designed to earn LEED™ Silver, Green Globes, and/or equivalent
third-party criteria, and no higher standard shall be required. Avoid sites considered
inappropriate, such as prime farmland, land identified as habitat for endangered
species, and wetlands or riparian areas associated with wildlife.
The building on the site exists and is not designed to LEED standards.
The Proposed Project does not this Criteria.
d. Utilize areas with existing utility and transportation infrastructure and existing
community services. This criterion is preferred for higher density and higher intensity
development, when feasible.
The site is in close proximity to existing utility infrastructure and is located on
an existing commercial site.
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria.
e. Redevelop and rehabilitate economically distressed properties (particularly greyfield
sites), damaged sites or environmentally contaminated 'brownfield' sites.
The Proposed Project represents the redevelopment and rehabilitation of an
aging commercial property, originally developed as a gas station. The proposed
investment revitalizes a long-standing commercial corner that has experienced
physical deterioration and through the proposed improvements, will transform
the property into a productive and attractive neighborhood-serving business.
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria.
f. Utilize locations within ½ mile of a planned light rail line or ¼ mile from an existing or
planned bus stop. This criterion is preferred for higher density and higher intensity
development, when feasible.
The Proposed Project is located approximately 200 feet from an eastbound bus
stop located on University Drive and approximately 80 feet from a westbound
bus stop located on the north side of University Drive.
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria.
3. Provide documented evidence that the building(s) will meet or exceed nationally
recognized environmental performance standards. For purposes of this criterion, buildings
that are designed to earn Green Globes, LEED™ Silver, or to be in compliance with the
International Green Construction Code and/or equivalent third-party criteria, are
considered to be energy efficient and no higher standard shall be required.
The building on the site exists and is not designed to LEED standards.
[14]
The Proposed Project does not this Criteria.
Based on the above analysis, staff finds that the Proposed Project is consistent with the purpose
of a BIZ overlay as outlined in MZO Section 11-21 and meets criteria 1 and 2 of Section 11-21-
3(B) by providing distinctive, superior quality designs and addressing environmental
performance standards.
Citizen Participation
The applicant conducted a Citizen Participation process, notifying surrounding property owners,
HOAs, and registered neighbors.
Neighborhood Meeting:
A neighborhood meeting was held on June 12, 2025, and there were no attendees present at that
meeting.
A second neighborhood meeting was held on April 29, 2026, where attendees raised
questions/concerns about the following:
The requested parking reduction and potential for off-site parking
Noise and light pollution associated with the 24-hour operation
The need for a tire shop and the compatibility with the residential neighborhood
On-site operations on the site including maneuverability
Services being offered beyond tire repair in the future
If this use was not there, would the site deteriorate instead of contributing to neighborhood
revitalization
Required Notification:
Property owners within 1,000 feet, HOAs within ½ mile, and registered neighborhoods
within one mile of the subject site were notified of the public hearing.
Staff received no public comment regarding the Proposed Project.
Public Comments – Planning and Zoning Board Hearing:
Ten citizens spoke in opposition to the request. Their concerns included the following:
Parking provided on the site is not sufficient for the proposed use
Opposition to the 24-hour operations proposed
The use will serve as an unwanted late-night gathering hub
The existing visual blight and inconsistency with the zoning district
The applicant has not demonstrated the need for the proposed use in this location or
consistency with the General Plan
[15]
Conditions of Approval
Staff recommends approval of the Rezone and Site Plan Review, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Compliance with the final site plan, landscape plan and elevations as submitted.
2. Compliance with the Good Neighbor Policy submitted.
3. All noise generating activities, including, but not limited to, tire installations and repairs,
shall be conducted within the fully enclosed building.
4. All exterior lighting shall conform to Section 11-30-5 of the Mesa Zoning Ordinance.
5. Outdoor storage of goods and equipment shall not be permitted.
6. Compliance with all applicable City development codes and regulations, except the
modifications to the development standards as shown in the following BIZ Overlay table:
Development Standards
BIZ Approved
Minimum Building and Parking
Area Setbacks – MZO Table 11-6-
3.A
Front and Street-Facing Side
Interior Side and Rear: Adjacent to
RS District
10’ (east property line to
building)
14’ (east property line to
parking area)
23’ (west property line to
building)
5’ (west property line to parking
area)
22’ (south property line to
building)
Auto Service Bays – MZO Section
11-30-9(F)(2)(d)
3’ screen wall
Parking Areas – MZO Section 11-
30-9(H)(7)
0’
Automobile/Vehicle Repair – MZO
Section 11-31-6(A)
0.4± acres
[16]
Development Standards
BIZ Approved
Size of Parking Spaces and
Maneuvering Aisles – MZO Section
11-32-2(J)
11’
Required Parking Spaces by Use –
MZO Table 11-32.3.A
11 spaces (4 spaces may
conditionally satisfy
requirement per Condition of
Approval No. 8.)
Setback of Cross Drive Aisles –
MZO Section 11-32-4(A)
18’
Perimeter Landscaping – MZO
Table 11-6-3.A
Front and Street-Facing Sides
shall be Landscaped According to
Ch. 33
12’ (minimum north property
line)
11’ (minimum east property line)
Required Number of Plants by
Street Type – MZO Table 11-33-
3.A.4
1 Tree and 6 Shrubs per 25 Linear
Feet of Street Frontage
Two 36-inch box trees and two
24-inch Ocotillo (east property
line)
Required Landscape Yards – MZO
Section 11-33—(B)(1)(a)(i)
Landscaping
for
Non-Single
Residence Uses Adjacent to Single
Residence Uses less than 5 Acres
5’ (minimum west property line)
6’ (minimum south property
line)
Landscape Islands – MZO Section
11-33-4(B)(2)
One island 3 feet wide and 18
feet long
Landscape Island Plant Material –
MZO Section 11-33-4(D)
0 trees
[17]
Development Standards
BIZ Approved
Foundation Base – MZO Section
11-33-5(A)
Exterior
Walls
with
a
Public
Entrance
Exterior Walls without a Public
Entrance, not Adjacent to Parking
Stalls
5’ minimum (north elevation)
4’ (west elevation)
0’ minimum (south elevation)
Landscape Area in Foundation
Base – MZO Section 11-33-5(B)(1)
1 Tree Per 50 Linear Feet or Less
of Exterior Wall Length
0 Trees
Plant Material Within Foundation
Base – MZO Section 11-33-5(B)(3)
Exterior Walls Visible from Public
Parking or ROW with Public
Entrances
0% (north elevation)
7. Installation of all off-site improvements and street frontage landscaping during the first
phase of construction.
8. On a conditional basis, four (4) parking spaces will be considered to satisfy the parking
requirement, so long as: (a) the reduced on-site parking requirement does not create
adverse parking impacts on surrounding streets, properties, or the adjacent neighborhood;
or (b) services offered on-site do not result in customer vehicles queuing or waiting in the
public right-of-way or adjacent property. A violation of subsection (a) or (b) may be shown
by the City’s Civil Hearing Officer entering a judgment finding a responsible party
responsible for a civil violation of the Mesa City Code. If a violation of subsection (a) or (b)
is established, four (4) parking spaces will not be considered to satisfy the parking
requirement, and the property owner shall obtain the applicable alternative compliance
permit, shared parking approval, off-site parking approval, or other required parking
approval within thirty (30) days, unless a longer period is approved by the Zoning
Administrator. If the violation is based solely on subsection (b), the property owner may
instead discontinue the service causing the off-site queuing, in which case four (4) parking
spaces may continue to satisfy the parking requirement if the Zoning Administrator
determines the discontinuance resolves the off-site queuing.
Exhibits
Exhibit 1 - Presentation
[18]
Exhibit 2 - Ordinance
Exhibit 3 - Ordinance Map
Exhibit 4 - Vicinity Map
Exhibit 5 - Site Plan
Exhibit 6 - Minutes
Exhibit 7 - Submittal Documents