Exhibit 3 - Public Comment

City of Mesa — City Council (2026-07-20)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 6566 characters
June 3, 2026 
 
Ms. Rachel Phillips 
Assistant Planning Director 
City of Mesa 
20 East Main Street 
Mesa, Arizona 85201 
 
Transmitted Via Email 
 
Dear Ms. Phillips: 
 
Thank you for the opportunity for Valley Partnership to meet with you and your team 
last week to discuss the City’s proposed 2026 Zoning Code Refinement.  
 
As you know, Valley Partnership, representing 350 Company Partners and almost 2,000 
Members advocating for responsible development, has worked for decades in 
collaboration with municipalities, including Mesa, to craft and support policies that 
create clarity and certainty in the development process.  
 
We want to recognize and thank you and your team for sharing these proposed Zoning 
Code amendments with the development community. Additionally, we truly appreciate 
your willingness to quickly schedule a meeting with us to clarify the questions we had, 
as well as your knowledgeable responses.  
 
Thank you for continuing to work with us in partnership. Please don’t hesitate to 
contact me with any questions. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
 
Clark Princell 
President & CEO 
 
Cc:  Scott Butler, Mesa City Manager  
 
Nana Appiah, Development Services Director

This Message Is From an External Sender
Use caution when clicking links, attachments, or responding to information requests.
     Report Suspicious     ‌
From:
Mesa Development Services
To:
Long Range Planning
Subject:
Proposed Text Amendments Comment
Date:
Sunday, June 21, 2026 11:06:47 PM
Proposed Text Amendments Comment
Name
Jacob Cluff
Are you submitting
feedback as a:
Architect / Engineer
I have a comment or
question regarding:
2026 Zoning Code Refinement
11-30-8(D) - Safety is extremely important and
looking at the losses - of life and money - caused
by accidents on the ADOT website is sobering. As
cars have gotten faster and larger and drivers have
become more distracted, looking at how safety can
be improved for all is very important. However, I
think that there are a number of ways to go about
it. Consider an American city and a Dutch city as
automobiles were introduced. Both, prior to the
vehicles, were walkable and human scaled. Both,
as vehicles were introduced, experienced a high
number of automobile-related deaths, particularly
among children. Residents in both cities organized
and pushed back against the large and fast metal
machines with limited visibility that were killing
their children. In one, automakers flipped the
narrative: Streets that had been for people were
now for vehicles, and it was the pedestrians'
responsibility to ensure safety. Since then, policies
that shape our environments have been adopted

2026 Zoning Code
Refinement - please
indicate the draft
code section and
your
questions/comments
using this perspective and 'improved safety' has
been achieved by strictly segregating motorists and
pedestrians. 
By creating systems where variables are removed,
automobile deaths have decreased, but at the loss
of walkable and human scaled cities and the
creation of some truly desolate and hostile places
for anyone that is not in a vehicle. Also, they only
work as long as variables are not introduced. As
soon as someone walks into the street, or when a
distracted driver strays from their designated
space, lives and property are in danger. If it wasn't
clear, this city is, unfortunately, the American one.
Back to the Dutch one. There, it was decided that
safety would not come at the expense of walkable
cities or the children who played on the streets
with their friends. Streets are designed to
accommodate pedestrians, cyclists, and yes, even
motorists. They are quieter and have far fewer
accidents. How? By having many variables
(pedestrians, cyclists, trees, speed bumps, planters,
and the reason that I'm writing all this; bollards).
These variables create 'friction' and drivers
automatically slow down. This principle is seen in
our American city too: Imagine a highway that has
closed the shoulder or a lane. Cars in the adjacent
lane move slower because of the perceived
narrowing of the driving area. The closed lane does
so much more to lower vehicle speeds than any
amount of signs or paint will. However, if I had to
pick between the two, I would pick the narrow
streets, trees and concrete planter bollards over
the traffic cones.
The leadership in some cities must feel similarly,
because I've seen instances where streets are
being modified to be more pedestrian friendly and,

in the process, safer. Instead of segregating
automobile space and pedestrian space, they've
put them on the same level (literally). By raising
certain areas of the street and placing bollards on
the edges, there is more friction for motorists, but
less for pedestrians. This can be observed in our
Dutch city (any will do), Madrid, Denver, Tempe,
and even Mesa (the parking lot at Dana Park
features a gentle slope from the sidewalk to the
drive aisle and is separated with concrete planters
with flowers in them). 
Again, I want to be safe. I want Mesa to be safe.
And I believe that we can achieve this while also
becoming a more walkable and human scaled city. I
feel that bollards are a crucial tool for this. 
So, when I see that bollards are being removed as
an option and that segregated spaces that are
frictionless for motorists and that we've seen fail
time and time again are being further codified in the
name of safety, I have to ask: 
Who is it safer for?
Please don't say the cyclists who are getting
scythed down as distracted drivers cross a line of
paint and maybe a 'candlestick' that was designed
to break on impact. 
Or the pedestrians who understand the inherent
danger of stepping down from the curb onto the
asphalt and who run to the other side of the street
(and around the car that didn't come to a complete
stop until it was halfway through the crosswalk) at
an intersection despite that a walk sign is on.
I hope that we can pause for a moment and look at
how other cities (or even our own, as referenced
above) have been able to achieve safety for all
users on their streets while also making them more

pleasant spaces to be, and then refine our code in a
way that allows those success to be replicated.
Fleet-Based
Services & Service
Station Text
Amendments -
please indicate the
draft code section
and your
questions/comments
Please provide your
general
question/comments
Would you like a
response to your
question(s)?
Yes
Would you like to
be notified of future
public meetings?
Yes
Email
jacobcluff92@gmail.com
Help articles | Support portal
Forms & Workflow is a Granicus product.