04. 05. CPA260008 Z260019 PZ Staff Report

Maricopa County — Planning & Zoning (2026-08-06)

View PDF Item 4 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 82316 characters
CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 1 of 13 
 
 
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission 
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department 
 
 
Cases: 
CPA260008 & Z260019 – Camelback Creek  
 
 
 
Hearing Date: 
August 6, 2026 
 
Supervisor District: 
4 
 
 
  
 
Applicant: 
Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC 
 
Owners: 
Balterra Partners and 590 Acres LLC 
   
Requests: 
1)  General Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to change the land 
use designation within the Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan from Rural 
Densities (0-1 du/ac) to Mixed Use 
 
 
2)  Zone Change from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD 
 
 
  
 
Site Location: 
Generally located at the NWC of 411th Ave. & Camelback Rd. in the 
Tonopah area 
 
  
Site Size: 
Approximately 309.9 acres 
 
Density: 
N/A 
 
County Island:  
No 
 
 
County Plan: 
Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan –Rural Densities (0-1 du/ac) 
 
Municipal Plan: 
N/A 
 
Support/Opposition: 
1 letter of support 
 
Recommendations: 
1) Approve (CPA260008) 
 
 
2) Approve with conditions (Z260019)

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 2 of 13 
Project Summary: 
 
1. The applicant, on behalf of the property owners, is requesting a General Comprehensive Plan 
Amendment (CPA) of the Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan to change the Rural Densities (0-1 du/ac) to 
Mixed Use with a zone change from Rural–43 to IND-2 IUPD to support mixed use development that 
may include residential, commercial, industrial, and entertainment uses. 
 
2. The site is located in the Tonopah area at the northwest corner or Camelback Rd. & 411th Ave. The 
site is currently vacant and may have been previously utilized for agriculture purposes. The large 
site is located near residences to the north, east and southwest of the site. The site is located 
approximately 0.7 miles north of I-10.  
 
3. The CPA narrative asserts that the proposal meets the following criteria: 
 
4. Will the amendment constitute an overall improvement to the Comprehensive Plan and is not solely 
for the good or benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time?  
 
The Site has never been developed. The proposed General CPA will provide flexible development 
opportunities on a piece of vacant land with access to freeway infrastructure. Development of the 
Site will bring much needed infrastructure improvements to the area, including the buildout of a 
roadway network around the Site. Designation of the Site as Mixed Use will further economic growth 
in the area by developing both long-term and short-term employment opportunities and providing 
potential housing options for future employees and supportive commercial uses. Long-term 
employment will be created by the development of uses with highly skilled employment 
opportunities, such as data center uses. Further, short-term employment opportunities will be 
provided through construction activities related to the development on the Site. 
 
5. Will the amendment adversely impact all or a portion of the planning area by:  
 
A. Altering acceptable land use patterns to the detriment of the plan;  
The proposal responds to the existing and planned uses in the surrounding context. The Site is 
surrounded largely by vacant land, with limited large lot residential development. To the south of 
the I-10 are a few industrial and commercial uses. The proposed mix of uses will support the 
existing residential, commercial, and industrial uses in the surrounding context while offering new 
development that will strengthen the regional economy and contribute to the growth of the area. 
 
B. Requiring public expenditures for larger and more expensive infrastructure;  
Redesignating the Site with future industrial uses will allow for future investment in much-needed 
public infrastructure. Access to the development will require the extension and improvement of 
roadways and other key public infrastructure, which will be determined as part of the future site 
planning process. 
 
C. Requiring public improvements to roads, sewer, or water systems that are needed to support the 
planned land uses;  
 
Improvements to existing public infrastructure, as determined by Maricopa County during the 
future site planning process, shall be completed by the developer. New infrastructure serving the 
Site, such as vehicular access, sewer, and water, will also be completed by the developer. 
 
D. Adversely impacting planned uses because of increased traffic;  
At this time, it is not foreseen that the proposal will adversely impact the area through increased 
traffic. A traffic engineer will be engaged to study the traffic flows once end users are identified.

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 3 of 13 
 
E. Affect the livability of the area or health or safety of present and future residents; or  
The intent is to develop the Site synergistically with the existing rural uses in the area. The 
proposed development will bring much needed infrastructure to the surrounding area, 
employment opportunities, and establish supportive uses, furthering the economic growth of the 
region. 
 
F. Adversely impacting the natural environment or scenic quality of the area in contradiction to the 
plan?  
Due to its location along the I-10, the area is rapidly being entitled with more intense uses such as 
industrial and commercial. Although the area is going through a significant transition, the 
proposal will remain sensitive to the rural character of the area by offering synergistic land uses 
to those in the surrounding context with appropriate scale to further the transition between the I-
10 and the uses around the Site. 
 
 
6. Area of Application as Defined within the Framework of the Comprehensive Plan.  
a. Is the area within the current limits of a Municipal Planning Area? If so which area? 
The Site is not located within a Municipal Planning Area. 
 
b. Is the area within an approved Development Master Plan (DMP)? If so, identify.  
The site is not located within a Development Master Plan. 
 
c. Is the area within an Improvement Association? If so, identify.  
The site is not located within an improvement district. 
 
7. Applicable Land Uses in the Comprehensive Plan–  
a. Rural Land Uses – The Site is designated for “Rural Land Uses” in the Comprehensive Plan. 
b. Urban Land Uses – The Site is not designated for “Urban Land Uses” in the Comprehensive 
Plan. 
c. Urban Land Uses in a Municipal Plan - The Site is not located within a Municipal Planning Area 
and therefore, is not designated for “Urban Land Uses” in a Municipal Plan. 
 
8. Does the area have assurance of timely annexation from a municipality (even if designated for Rural 
Uses in the Comprehensive Plan)?  
The Site is not eligible for annexation at this time. Annexation is governed by Arizona State Law, 
which permits annexation of territory into a City or Town only if it is contiguous with that 
jurisdiction. A.R.S § 9-471. The nearest City is the City of Buckeye, located miles to the east of the 
Site, and is therefore, not contiguous with the Site nor is the Site located within the City’s Planning 
Boundary. Therefore, because the Site is not eligible for annexation, no assurances for annexation 
have been provided by a municipality. 
 
9. Consistency with the Urban Solutions for Urban Development Strategy of the Comprehensive Plan. 
a. Potable water service and infrastructure 
The Site is located within the Global Water – Belmont Water Company, Inc. (a part of Global 
Water Resources) service area. Currently no water infrastructure exists within the Site or 
adjacent right-of-way that would provide immediate connection. The nearest existing water 
system, owned by Global Water Resources, serves a small number of homes northwest of the 
Site near the intersection of Bethany Home Road and 419th Avenue. The Site’s footprint and 
anticipated development potential far exceed this existing water system, therefore it appears 
unlikely that interconnection to this system could serve the Site’s water needs.

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 4 of 13 
The potable and non-potable water demands at the Site may vary depending on the type of 
industrial use. It is anticipated that domestic, fire flow, production, and/or supplemental cooling 
water demands for the site will be met with onsite wells. A groundwater well within the Site area 
is owned by Cottonwood Creek LLC according to ADWR Record No. 55-610549. Records for this 
well indicate it may have been previously equipped with substantial capacity including 
municipal/domestic use. This existing well and potential new wells will need to be evaluated 
for current suitability. We anticipate that a facility will be constructed onsite to provide potable 
water storage, pumping capacity 
 
b. Sewer Service 
The Site is located within the Global Water – Hassayampa Utilities Company, Inc. service area. 
There are no existing sewer mains in the vicinity of the Site. As the anticipated wastewater flows 
from the Site will vary depending on the type of industrial use, due to the size and anticipated 
land use of the site it will likely require connection to a municipal water reclamation facility 
(WRF) or onsite dedicated treatment plant. No receiving surface waters are adjacent to the site, 
so disposal of treated effluent would need to be achieved through some combination of 
process reuse of effluent, land application, and/or aquifer injection with an Aquifer Protection 
Permit (APP). Initial small-scale development may be served by individual septic system serving 
each building and/or parcel as an interim condition. 
 
c. Flood control management systems 
The topography generally slopes south and is comprised of floodplain within the north half of 
the Site. The proposed use of drainage channels and placement of fill will allow for potential 
floodplain reclamation while largely preserving the historic flow patterns of the existing washes. 
This approach, in combination with adherence to Maricopa County’s drainage design guidelines 
and the pending submittal of a CLOMR, helps to ensure no adverse stormwater impacts to 
adjacent properties. This approach also effectively increases the developable area and 
enhances the overall efficiency and flexibility of the site plan. 
 
d. Dry Utilities 
The project is located within the APS service area for electric. Currently, APS has a lower voltage 
service in the project vicinity. Extending higher voltage for a heavier power user(s) will take more 
time. We expect to work with APS on a Feasibility Study to evaluate options 
for the Site and are currently working other options for power service, such as natural gas and 
other behind-the-meter solutions. 
 
e. Law enforcement and medical services 
The Site will be served by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office for police service and is located 
in the South County Fire & Medical service area for fire and emergency medical service. 
 
f. Hospital or emergency medical services 
The nearest hospital, the Abrazo Buckeye Emergency Center, is approximately 30 minutes from 
the Site. Emergency medical service will be provided by South County Fire & Medical. 
 
g. School facilities 
Nearby school districts and schools include the Saddle Mountain Unified School District, Ruth 
Fischer Elementary School, and Tonopah Valley High School. 
 
h. Library services 
The Site is located approximately 30 minutes away from two separate branches of the Buckeye 
Public Library.

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 5 of 13 
 
i. 
Road capacity (any supporting Federal or State infrastructure projects?) 
It is anticipated that main access to the Site will be taken from 411th Avenue which currently 
has a traffic interchange at I-10. Specific access and circulation plans have not yet been 
finalized since no end users have been identified at this time; however, the intent is to provide 
a cohesive vehicular and pedestrian circulation system within the Site and extend and improve 
roadways providing access to the Site, as determined through the site planning process. A 
traffic engineer will be engaged to study the traffic flows once end users are identified. It should 
also be noted that the Site is in close proximity to the future Interstate-11 corridor, which is 
approximately 5-6 miles to the east of the Site. 
 
j. 
Alternative transportation (multi-modal) facilities, if applicable 
The Site is located just 15 minutes west from the Buckeye Municipal Airport, which can be easily 
accessed from the I-10. The Buckeye Park and Ride, with Valley Metro connection to the greater 
Phoenix area, is located approximately 30 minutes to the east of the Site. 
 
k. Other urban services (please describe) 
The Site is located near a variety of outdoor recreational activities, including the White Tank 
Mountain Regional Park, the Bighorn Mountains Wilderness, ranches, and trails. 
 
10. 
Is the amendment consistent with the overall intent of the Comprehensive Plan? 
The proposed amendment is consistent with the overall intent of the Maricopa County Framework 
2040 Comprehensive Plan (the “Comprehensive Plan”). The stated purpose of the Comprehensive 
Plan is to maintain a high quality of life for Maricopa County residents by protecting public health 
and safety, promoting stable economic growth, maintaining a healthy environment, providing 
adequate community services, and ensuring that tax money is spent efficiently. The 
Comprehensive Plan utilizes unifying vision and mission statements to achieve its stated 
purpose: 
A. Vision: Citizens serving citizens collaboratively, efficiently, and effectively. 
B. Mission: Provide regional leadership and fiscally responsible services for a healthy, safe 
community. 
C. Strategic Priorities: Safe communities, best-in-class regional services, efficient infrastructure, 
economic vitality, and fiscal stability. 
The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan is described as the “foundational component 
of the Comprehensive Plan, shaping the County’s vision for responsible growth and development. 
The Land Use Element provides for development that aligns “growth with available infrastructure 
and public services, ensuring that new development enhances connectivity, efficiency and 
community vitality.” The proposed industrial uses will provide for stable, long-term growth in the 
region by providing employment opportunities in highly skilled sectors. The proposal for a mixed-
use development will provide opportunities to support the industrial uses through housing options 
and commercial and entertainment amenities. The Site is the ideal location for these future uses 
given its proximity to major transportation infrastructure – the I-10. If approved, the development 
will result in land uses that are sensible, consistent, practical, and balanced across the 
Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan. 
The General CPA request proposes uses that are appropriate in a rural context with immediate 
access to major transportation infrastructure. The proposal responds to the existing and planned 
uses in the surrounding context by proposing a mix of uses to provide current and future 
inhabitants opportunities to live, work, and play in the immediate area. Additionally, the proposed 
mix use development will bring much needed public infrastructure to the area that currently does 
not exist in the surrounding context.

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 6 of 13 
11. 
To what extent is the amendment consistent with the specific goals and policies contained within 
the plan? 
The proposed General CPA advances the goals and policies of both the Comprehensive Plan and 
the Area Plan, as discussed in greater detail below: 
 
Comprehensive Plan 
Land Use Goal #1: Achieve a coordinated pattern of development. 
Response: The Site is an ideal location for a mixed use development given its proximity to the I-10 
and the planned uses in the surrounding context. As mentioned previously, the Site is just north of 
the planned Tonopah Logistics Center. Further south, across the I-10, are existing commercial and 
industrial uses. East of the Site is the proposed Balterra mixed use development, which will work in 
concert with this proposal. The Site responds to the development patterns in the surrounding 
context by offering synergistic land uses. 
 
Transportation Goal #2: Manage the transportation system to provide continual improvements in 
reliability, efficiency, and safety. 
Response: The exact roadway configuration will be determined during the site planning phase; 
however, the Applicant is committed to working collaboratively with MCDOT throughout this and 
subsequent application processes. Any roadways required to be improved, as determined by 
Maricopa County during the future site planning process, will be completed by the developer. 
 
Economic Growth Goal #1: Foster a diverse and balanced economy to promote long-term 
economic stability and economic resiliency. 
Response: As mentioned previously, the proposal will further economic growth in the region by 
developing both long-term employment opportunities in highly skilled sectors and short-term 
employment opportunities as the Site develops. The proposal for a mixed use development will 
provide the ability to include residential and commercial uses to support industrial development 
occurring on the Site. 
 
Cost of Development Goal #2: Require that new development pays its proper and reasonable share 
of the costs of new infrastructure, services, and other public improvements. 
Response: Site and infrastructure improvements will be completed by the developer. 
 
Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan 
Transportation Objective T.1: Establish a circulation system that provides for the safe, convenient 
and efficient movement of goods and people throughout Maricopa County. 
Response: The Site is adjacent to numerous existing and planned roadways, providing for 
numerous access and circulation options. Future development will extend, improve, and connect to 
existing roadways as required by a Traffic Impact Analysis (“TIA”) through subsequent site 
planning processes. When end users are identified and during the site planning phase, a traffic 
engineer will be retained to analyze traffic flows to and from the Site. 
 
Environment Policy E5.1: Encourage the reduction of unpaved roads. 
Response: Future development on the Site will include paved roadways. Surrounding dirt roadways 
will be paved if warranted by the TIA at the time of site planning. 
 
Economic Development Objective 1: Permit major commercial and job employment centers where 
the labor force and infrastructure exist or are planned. 
Response: The Site is ideally located north of the I-10 freeway, providing opportunity for industrial 
uses with skilled employment opportunities. The proposed General CPA will permit a wide array of 
future industrial uses that are flexible enough to respond to market conditions, but stable enough

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 7 of 13 
to provide long-term economic growth to the area. The proposed mix of commercial, residential, 
and entertainment uses will support any industrial uses that occur on the Site. Adequate 
infrastructure to serve the Site will be planned during the site planning process. 
 
12. 
The IUPD proposes modified development standards from the base zoning district for flexibility 
in site design. This includes an 85’ maximum building/structure for modern data center design 
practices. Parking requirements are requested at a minimum one space per 2,500 sq ft of data 
center building floor area as arguably the use is employee extensive. Screening is  proposed at a 
6’ CMU wall increased to 8’ CMU wall when adjacent to rural or residential zoning. In an effort to 
mitigate adverse impact on residences to the north, the applicant proposes a 50’ landscaped 
buffer external to screen walls across the entire northern boundary of the IND-2 IUPD zoning 
district. The proposal is to match industry standards and provide a congruent site design. The 
IUPD will also limit the entitled uses of the base IND-2 zoning district to uses appropriate for 
wastewater disposal via septic until such time as sewer infrastructure is installed. 
 
13. 
The following table contrast the proposed IUPD against the development standards of the base 
IND-2 zoning district. Deviations are shown in bold print 
 
REGULATION 
IND-2 ZONING DISTRICT 
PROPOSED IUPD 
Maximum Height  
60' 
85’ 
Minimum Front Setback 
20' 
20' 
Minimum Side Setback 
10 feet, except when 
abutting a rural or 
residential zoning district, 
then 25 feet 
10 feet, except when abutting a 
rural or residential zoning 
district, then 25 feet 
Minimum Rear Setback 
10 feet, except when 
abutting a rural or 
residential zoning district, 
then 25 feet 
None, except when abutting a 
rural or residential zoning 
district, then 25 feet 
Minimum Lot Area 
6,000 sq. ft. 
6,000 sq. ft. 
Minimum Lot Width  
60' 
60' 
Maximum Lot Coverage 
60% 
60% 
Minimum Parking Spaces 
Warehouse Uses: 1 space 
per 900 square feet of 
floor area 
Warehouse/Data Center Uses: 1 
space per 2,500 square feet of 
floor area 
Minimum Screening 
6' solid wall 
6-foot solid wall; 8-foot solid 
wall when adjacent to a rural or 
residential zoning district 
Minimum Northern Perimeter 
Screening 
6’ solid wall 
Minimum 50’ landscaped 
setback along northern 
boundary of the IND-2 IUPD 
zoning district 
Permitted Primary Uses 
MCZO, Sec. 601 
Any use permitted in the IND-2 
zoning district but only those 
appropriate for wastewater 
disposal via onsite septic 
systems until sewer is available

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 8 of 13 
 
Aerial photo of subject site 
 
 
 
Aerial image & surrounding environs

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 9 of 13 
 
Eagle view of subject site looking north into subject parcel (aerial image dated Sept 2021)  
 
 
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use: 
 
14. 
On-site: 
Rural-43 / Vacant - Undeveloped 
North: 
Rural-43 / Residential and Vacant land uses  
South: 
Rural-43/ Camelback Rd then Vacant - Undeveloped 
East: 
Rural-43/ 411th Ave then Residential and Vacant land uses 
West: 
Rural-43/ 419th Ave then Vacant- Undeveloped land uses 
 
 
Zoning District Map

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 10 of 13 
 
 
 
Proposed zoning exhibit  
 
Utilities, Services and Infrastructure 
 
15. 
Water: 
Global Water Resources/Belmont Water Company 
Wastewater: 
Global Water Resources/Hassayampa Utilities Company, INC 
Public Schools: 
Saddle Mountain Unified School District (Ruth Fischer Elementary, 
 
Tonopah Valley High School) 
Fire: 
South County Fire & Medical 
Police:  
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office 
Electric: 
APS 
 
However, there are currently no municipal or private company services available to the subject 
site. The applicant has not obtained documentation (“will-serve” letters) from the proposed 
service providers for future development of water, wastewater, electricity, gas, 
and fire infrastructure. The applicant will be required to provide documentation with POD 
application/s. 
  
Right-of-Way: 
 
16. 
The following table includes existing and proposed half-width right-of-way and the future 
classification based upon the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Major 
Streets and Routes Plan.

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 11 of 13 
 
Street Name 
Half-width Existing 
R/W 
Half-width Proposed 
R/W 
Future Classification 
Camelback 
Road 
40’ 
40’ 
Urban Principal Arterial 
411th Avenue 
35 
80’ 
Urban Parkway 
419th Avenue 
30’ 
40’ 
Minor Arterial 
 
17. 
The majority of the roadways in the immediate area are unpaved. The development will be 
responsible for half street improvements surrounding the site though regional paving may be 
required to access the site from 1-10 to the south. Right of way and roadway dedication will take 
place at a future time when the parcel comes in for a Plan of Development.  
 
Adopted Plan: 
 
18. 
Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan (adopted September 6, 2000): The plan designated the site as rural 
development area (0-1 du/ac) with a maximum density of one dwelling unit per gross acre, 
suitable for agricultural related uses and residential land uses. 
 
Public Participation Summary: 
 
19. 
The applicant complied with the requirements of the citizen review process with the required 
posting of the site and notification by first class mail to interested parties and adjacent property 
owners within 300’ of the subject parcel. Signs were posted on the site, in accordance with 
applicable regulations. According to the applicant’s citizen participation results report, the 
applicant has not received any responses, opposition, or support for this request. As of the writing 
of this report, staff has not received any correspondence. 
 
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies: 
 
20. 
N/A 
 
Staff Analysis: 
 
21. 
Staff is supportive of both the comprehensive plan amendment and the rezoning due to the 
changing nature of the area. The overall area is undeveloped with a very sparse scattering of 
residences. The applicant has taken additional steps to introduce a landscaped buffer on the 
northern side however,  the proposed 85’ maximum height allowance will make future structures 
visible from all vantage points. The request for the site reflects a further expansion of the IND-2 
zoning being requested on nearby parcels and the regional area. The application is reliant on 
future regional corridors to develop in the area (future I-11) to accommodate future regional 
growth in the area . There is no known opposition to the IND-2 IUPD zoning, staff has received 1 
letter of support from a local interest group.  
 
Recommendations: 
 
22. 
Staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion recommending that the Board of Supervisors 
approve CPA260008.  
 
23. 
Staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion recommending that the Board of Supervisors 
approve Z260019 subject to the following conditions ‘a’ – ‘i’:

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 12 of 13 
 
a. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit 
entitled “Camelback Creek Zoning Exhibit“, consisting of 1 full-size sheet dated March 
27, 2026, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight 
refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan.  Minor 
and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 
of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. 
 
b. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report 
entitled “Zone Change with Overlay”, consisting of 8 pages, dated June 16 2026, except 
as modified by the following conditions. 
 
c. 
Prior to grading the site, Developer shall complete and submit an archaeological/historical 
review to the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). 
 
d. 
Administrative approval of a Plan of Development will be required prior to approval and 
issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. Prior to 
issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency 
fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in 
accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection 
service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, 
local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. 
 
e. 
The applicant shall provide “Will Serve” letters for all utilities/service providers prior to 
issuance of building permits.  
 
f. 
The following IUPD development standards shall apply: 
1. 
Maximum Height: 85 feet 
2. 
Minimum Parking: Warehouse/Data Center Uses: 1 space per 2,500 square feet 
3. 
Minimum Screening: 6-foot CMU wall, except 8’ CMU wall adjacent to rural or 
residential zoning districts 
4. 
Minimum Perimeter Screening: At least a 50’ landscaped setback along northern 
boundary of the IND-2 IUPD zoning district 
5. 
Permitted Uses: Until such time as the site is served by sewer, uses on the site shall 
only be those acceptable to the Maricopa County Environmental Services 
Department (MCESD) where wastewater disposal can be accommodated by on-site 
septic systems. A public water system shall be required prior to establishment of 
any non-residential use that requires potable water. 
 
g. 
The following Engineering conditions shall apply: 
1. 
Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design 
 
only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with 
 
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and 
 
Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway 
 
Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices 
 
at the time of application for construction. 
2. 
Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes 
 
to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the 
 
site’s drainage infrastructure. 
3. 
Maricopa County does not supply water, fire or sewer services. It is the 
 
applicant/owner’s responsibility to coordinate and secure water, fire and

CPA260008 & Z260019 
Page 13 of 13 
 
sewer services for this site. 
4. 
Sealed final Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans and Sealed Final 
drainage report must be submitted with the application for Building Permits 
 
h. 
The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the 
County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. 
 
i. 
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, 
with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to 
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, 
subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property 
may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It 
is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with 
any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, 
divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the 
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the 
Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of 
the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same 
value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. 
 
 
Presented by: 
Andrew Lorentzen, Planner 
Reviewed by: 
Rachel Applegate, Planning Supervisor 
 
Attachments: 
Case Map (1 page) 
 
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Narrative (12 pages)  
 
Zoning Exhibit  (1 page) 
 
Rezoning Narrative Report (9 pages) 
 
Engineering comments (3 pages) 
 
 
MCDOT comments  (2 pages) 
 
MCESD comments (4 pages) 
 
Support correspondence (1 page)

CPA260008 
& Z260019

General Comprehensive Plan Amendment 
Camelback Creek 
411th Avenue and Camelback Road 
Application Number: CPA260008 
 
1st Submittal: April 10, 2026 
2nd Submittal: June 11, 2026 
Prepared by: 
Berry Riddell LLC 
Wendy Riddell, Esq. 
Sarah Sawyer, Esq. 
6750 E. Camelback Road, Suite 100 
Scottsdale, AZ 85251 
 
Prepared for: 
Arizona Land Consulting 
Anita Verma-Lallian 
7181 East Camelback Road, Suite 401 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

A. Executive Summary 
The purpose of this request is to seek a General Comprehensive Plan Amendment (“CPA”) 
for approximately 320 acres located at the northwest corner of 411th Avenue and 
Camelback Road (the “Site”), as shown below. The Site is designated as Rural on the 
Tonopah Arlington Area Plan (the “Area Plan”) which permits residential development 
with an average density of 1 du/ac. The intent is to redesignate the Site as Mixed Use on 
the Area Plan to permit a mixed use development which may include residential, 
commercial, industrial, and entertainment uses.  
 
 
Existing and Proposed Land Use Designations 
On-Site and Regional Location 
The current Comprehensive Plan Amendment area is comprised of approximately 320 
acres located at the northwest corner of 411th Avenue and Camelback Road. The Site is 
located north of the I-10, with direct access to the I-10 via 411th Avenue.  
Suitability with the Surrounding Land Uses 
The Site is largely surrounded by existing and planned roadways, vacant land, and limited 
large lot residential uses. 419th Avenue runs along the west boundary of the Site and 
Missouri Avenue runs along the north boundary of the Site, but does not connect to 411th 
Avenue to the east. To the north and east are large residential lots, many of which are

undeveloped, with Rural-43 zoning. To the south, beyond Camelback Road, and to the 
west, beyond 419th Avenue, is vacant land zoned Rural-43. 
The current request responds to the nearby planned uses, such as the proposed Balterra 
mixed use development to the southeast, by offering synergistic future land uses. The 
current request, which seeks a Mixed Use Comprehensive Plan use designation, envisages 
residential, community serving commercial and employment, entertainment, and 
industrial uses appropriate in a rural setting with access to major transportation 
infrastructure. 
Roads and Transportation Systems 
The exact roadway configuration will be approved at the time of zoning and site planning. 
The Applicant is dedicated to collaborating with MCDOT through the CPA, zone change, 
and site planning processes to ensure circulation will adequately support the Site. A traffic 
engineer will be engaged to study the traffic flows once end users are identified. 
B. Will the amendment constitute an overall improvement 
to the Comprehensive Plan and is not solely for the good 
or benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a 
particular point in time? 
The Site has never been developed. The proposed General CPA will provide flexible 
development opportunities on a piece of vacant land with access to freeway 
infrastructure. Development of the Site will bring much needed infrastructure 
improvements to the area, including the buildout of a roadway network around the Site.  
Designation of the Site as Mixed Use will further economic growth in the area by 
developing both long-term and short-term employment opportunities and providing 
potential housing options for future employees and supportive commercial uses. Long-
term employment will be created by the development of uses with highly skilled 
employment opportunities, such as data center uses.  Further, short-term employment 
opportunities will be provided through construction activities related to the development 
on the Site.

C. Will the amendment adversely impact all or a portion of 
the planning area by: 
1. Altering acceptable land use patterns to the detriment of 
the plan; 
The proposal responds to the existing and planned uses in the surrounding context. The 
Site is surrounded largely by vacant land, with limited large lot residential development. 
To the south of the I-10 are a few industrial and commercial uses. The proposed mix of 
uses will support the existing residential, commercial, and industrial uses in the 
surrounding context while offering new development that will strengthen the regional 
economy and contribute to the growth of the area. 
2. Requiring public expenditures for larger and more 
expensive infrastructure;  
Redesignating the Site with future industrial uses will allow for future investment in much-
needed public infrastructure. Access to the development will require the extension and 
improvement of roadways and other key public infrastructure, which will be determined 
as part of the future site planning process.  
3. Requiring public improvements to roads, sewer, or water 
systems that are needed to support the planned land uses; 
Improvements to existing public infrastructure, as determined by Maricopa County during 
the future site planning process, shall be completed by the developer. New infrastructure 
serving the Site, such as vehicular access, sewer, and water, will also be completed by the 
developer.  
4. Adversely impacting planned uses because of increased 
traffic; 
At this time, it is not foreseen that the proposal will adversely impact the area through 
increased traffic. A traffic engineer will be engaged to study the traffic flows once end 
users are identified.

5. Affect the livability of the area or health or safety of 
present and future residents; or 
The intent is to develop the Site synergistically with the existing rural uses in the area. The 
proposed development will bring much needed infrastructure to the surrounding area, 
employment opportunities, and establish supportive uses, furthering the economic 
growth of the region.  
6. Adversely impacting the natural environment or scenic 
quality of the area in contradiction to the plan?  
Due to its location along the I-10, the area is rapidly being entitled with more intense uses 
such as industrial and commercial. Although the area is going through a significant 
transition, the proposal will remain sensitive to the rural character of the area by offering 
synergistic land uses to those in the surrounding context with appropriate scale to further 
the transition between the I-10 and the uses around the Site.  
D. Area of Application as Defined within the Framework of the 
Comprehensive Plan. 
1. Is the area within the current limits of a Municipal Planning 
Area? If so, which area? 
The Site is not located within a Municipal Planning Area. 
2. Is the area within an approved Development Master Plan 
(DMP)? If so, identify.  
The Site is not located within a Development Master Plan. 
3. Is the area within an Improvement Association? If so, 
identify. 
The Site is not located within an Improvement Association. 
4. Which of the following applies?  
i. Is designated for “Rural Land Uses” in the 
Comprehensive Plan. 
The Site is designated for “Rural Land Uses” in the Comprehensive Plan.

ii. Is designated for “Urban Land Uses” in the 
Comprehensive Plan. 
The Site is not designated for “Urban Land Uses” in the Comprehensive Plan.  
iii. Is designated for “Urban Land Uses” in a Municipal 
Plan (even if designated for Rural Uses in the 
Comprehensive Plan)? 
The Site is not located within a Municipal Planning Area and therefore, is not designated 
for “Urban Land Uses” in a Municipal Plan. 
5. Does the area have assurance of timely annexation from a 
municipality (even if designated for Rural Uses in the 
Comprehensive Plan)? 
The Site is not eligible for annexation at this time. Annexation is governed by Arizona 
State Law, which permits annexation of territory into a City or Town only if it is contiguous 
with that jurisdiction. A.R.S § 9-471. The nearest City is the City of Buckeye, located miles 
to the east of the Site, and is therefore, not contiguous with the Site nor is the Site located 
within the City’s Planning Boundary. Therefore, because the Site is not eligible for 
annexation, no assurances for annexation have been provided by a municipality.  
E. Consistency with the Urban Solutions for Urban Development 
Strategy of the Comprehensive Plan. 
The goals of the Urban Solutions for Urban Development (“USUD”) Strategy is to “evaluate 
infrastructure readiness” and “gauge the ultimate feasibility of a Comprehensive Plan 
Amendment” in the unincorporated areas of the County.  
1. Potable water service and infrastructure  
The Site is located within the Global Water – Belmont Water Company, Inc. (a part of 
Global Water Resources) service area. Currently no water infrastructure exists within the 
Site or adjacent right-of-way that would provide immediate connection. The nearest 
existing water system, owned by Global Water Resources, serves a small number of homes 
northwest of the Site near the intersection of Bethany Home Road and 419th Avenue. The 
Site’s footprint and anticipated development potential far exceed this existing water 
system, therefore it appears unlikely that interconnection to this system could serve the 
Site’s water needs.

The potable and non-potable water demands at the Site may vary depending on the type 
of industrial use. It is anticipated that domestic, fire flow, production, and/or supplemental 
cooling water demands for the site will be met with onsite wells. A groundwater well 
within the Site area is owned by Cottonwood Creek LLC according to ADWR Record No. 
55-610549. Records for this well indicate it may have been previously equipped with 
substantial capacity including municipal/domestic use. This existing well and potential 
new wells will need to be evaluated for current suitability. We anticipate that a facility will 
be constructed onsite to provide potable water storage, pumping capacity and any 
needed water quality treatment as determined by future well analyses. 
2. Sewer Service  
The Site is located within the Global Water – Hassayampa Utilities Company, Inc. service 
area.  There are no existing sewer mains in the vicinity of the Site.  As the anticipated 
wastewater flows from the Site will vary depending on the type of industrial use, due to 
the size and anticipated land use of the site it will likely require connection to a municipal 
water reclamation facility (WRF) or onsite dedicated treatment plant. No receiving surface 
waters are adjacent to the site, so disposal of treated effluent would need to be achieved 
through some combination of process reuse of effluent, land application, and/or aquifer 
injection with an Aquifer Protection Permit (APP). Initial small-scale development may be 
served by individual septic system serving each building and/or parcel as an interim 
condition. 
3. Flood control management systems  
The topography generally slopes south and is comprised of floodplain within the north 
half of the Site. The proposed use of drainage channels and placement of fill will allow for 
potential floodplain reclamation while largely preserving the historic flow patterns of the 
existing washes.  This approach, in combination with adherence to Maricopa County’s 
drainage design guidelines and the pending submittal of a CLOMR, helps to ensure no 
adverse stormwater impacts to adjacent properties. This approach also effectively 
increases the developable area and enhances the overall efficiency and flexibility of the 
site plan. 
4. Dry Utilities  
The project is located within the APS service area for electric. Currently, APS has a lower 
voltage service in the project vicinity.  Extending higher voltage for a heavier power user(s) 
will take more time. We expect to work with APS on a Feasibility Study to evaluate options

for the Site and are currently working other options for power service, such as natural gas 
and other behind-the-meter solutions. 
5. Law enforcement and medical services  
The Site will be served by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office for police service and is 
located in the South County Fire & Medical service area for fire and emergency medical 
service. 
6. Hospital or emergency medical services  
The nearest hospital, the Abrazo Buckeye Emergency Center, is approximately 30 minutes 
from the Site. Emergency medical service will be provided by South County Fire & Medical. 
7. School facilities  
Nearby school districts and schools include the Saddle Mountain Unified School District, 
Ruth Fischer Elementary School, and Tonopah Valley High School. 
8. Library services  
The Site is located approximately 30 minutes away from two separate branches of the 
Buckeye Public Library. 
9. Road capacity (any supporting Federal or State 
infrastructure projects?)  
It is anticipated that main access to the Site will be taken from 411th Avenue which 
currently has a traffic interchange at I-10. Specific access and circulation plans have not 
yet been finalized since no end users have been identified at this time; however, the intent 
is to provide a cohesive vehicular and pedestrian circulation system within the Site and 
extend and improve roadways providing access to the Site, as determined through the 
site planning process. A traffic engineer will be engaged to study the traffic flows once 
end users are identified. It should also be noted that the Site is in close proximity to the 
future Interstate-11 corridor, which is approximately 5-6 miles to the east of the Site.

10. Alternative transportation (multi-modal) facilities, if 
applicable 
The Site is located just 15 minutes west from the Buckeye Municipal Airport, which can be 
easily accessed from the I-10. The Buckeye Park and Ride, with Valley Metro connection 
to the greater Phoenix area, is located approximately 30 minutes to the east of the Site.  
11. Other urban services (please describe) 
The Site is located near a variety of outdoor recreational activities, including the White 
Tank Mountain Regional Park, the Bighorn Mountains Wilderness, ranches, and trails. 
F. Is the amendment consistent with the overall intent of 
the Comprehensive Plan? 
The proposed amendment is consistent with the overall intent of the Maricopa County 
Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan (the “Comprehensive Plan”). The stated purpose of 
the Comprehensive Plan is to maintain a high quality of life for Maricopa County residents 
by protecting public health and safety, promoting stable economic growth, maintaining 
a healthy environment, providing adequate community services, and ensuring that tax 
money is spent efficiently. The Comprehensive Plan utilizes unifying vision and mission 
statements to achieve its stated purpose: 
A. Vision: Citizens serving citizens collaboratively, efficiently, and effectively. 
B. Mission: Provide regional leadership and fiscally responsible services for a healthy, 
safe community. 
C. Strategic Priorities: Safe communities, best-in-class regional services, efficient 
infrastructure, economic vitality, and fiscal stability.  
The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan is described as the “foundational 
component of the Comprehensive Plan, shaping the Coutny’s vision for responsible 
growth and development. The Land Use Element provides for development that aligns 
“growth with available infrastructure and public services, ensuring that new development 
enhances connectivity, efficiency and community vitality.” The proposed industrial uses 
will provide for stable, long-term growth in the region by providing employment 
opportunities in highly skilled sectors. The proposal for a mixed use development will 
provide opportunities to support the industrial uses through housing options and 
commercial and entertainment amenities. The Site is the ideal location for these future 
uses given its proximity to major transportation infrastructure – the I-10. If approved, the

development will result in land uses that are sensible, consistent, practical, and balanced 
across the Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan.  
The General CPA request proposes uses that are appropriate in a rural context with 
immediate access to major transportation infrastructure. The proposal responds to the 
existing and planned uses in the surrounding context by proposing a mix of uses to 
provide current and future inhabitants opportunities to live, work, and play in the 
immediate area. Additionally, the proposed mix use development will bring much needed 
public infrastructure to the area that currently does not exist in the surrounding context.  
G. To what extent is the amendment consistent with the 
specific goals and policies contained within the plan?  
The proposed General CPA advances the goals and policies of both the Comprehensive 
Plan and the Area Plan, as discussed in greater detail below. 
Comprehensive Plan 
Land Use Goal #1: Achieve a coordinated pattern of development. 
Response: The Site is an ideal location for a mixed use development given its 
proximity to the I-10 and the planned uses in the surrounding context. As 
mentioned previously, the Site is just north of the planned Tonopah Logistics 
Center. Further south, across the I-10, are existing commercial and industrial uses. 
East of the Site is the proposed Balterra mixed use development, which will work 
in concert with this proposal. The Site responds to the development patterns in the 
surrounding context by offering synergistic land uses.  
Transportation Goal #2: Manage the transportation system to provide continual 
improvements in reliability, efficiency, and safety. 
Response: The exact roadway configuration will be determined during the site 
planning phase; however, the Applicant is committed to working collaboratively 
with MCDOT throughout this and subsequent application processes. Any roadways 
required to be improved, as determined by Maricopa County during the future site 
planning process, will be completed by the developer. 
Economic Growth Goal #1: Foster a diverse and balanced economy to promote long-
term economic stability and economic resiliency. 
Response: As mentioned previously, the proposal will further economic growth in 
the region by developing both long-term employment opportunities in highly

skilled sectors and short-term employment opportunities as the Site develops. The 
proposal for a mixed use development will provide the ability to include residential 
and commercial uses to support industrial development occurring on the Site.   
Cost of Development Goal #2: Require that new development pays its proper and 
reasonable share of the costs of new infrastructure, services, and other public 
improvements. 
Response: Site and infrastructure improvements will be completed by the 
developer. 
Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan 
Transportation Objective T.1: Establish a circulation system that provides for the safe, 
convenient and efficient movement of goods and people throughout Maricopa County.  
Response: The Site is adjacent to numerous existing and planned roadways, 
providing for numerous access and circulation options. Future development will 
extend, improve, and connect to existing roadways as required by a Traffic Impact 
Analysis (“TIA”) through subsequent site planning processes. When end users are 
identified and during the site planning phase, a traffic engineer will be retained to 
analyze traffic flows to and from the Site.  
Environment Policy E5.1: Encourage the reduction of unpaved roads. 
Response: Future development on the Site will include paved roadways. 
Surrounding dirt roadways will be paved if warranted by the TIA at the time of site 
planning. 
Economic Development Objective 1: Permit major commercial and job employment 
centers where the labor force and infrastructure exist or are planned.  
Response: The Site is ideally located north of the I-10 freeway, providing 
opportunity for industrial uses with skilled employment opportunities. The 
proposed General CPA will permit a wide array of future industrial uses that are 
flexible enough to respond to market conditions, but stable enough to provide 
long-term economic growth to the area. The proposed mix of commercial, 
residential, and entertainment uses will support any industrial uses that occur on 
the Site. Adequate infrastructure to serve the Site will be planned during the site 
planning process.

H. CONCLUSION  
The purpose of this request is to seek a General Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 
approximately 320 acres located at the northwest corner of 411th Avenue and Camelback 
Road. The CPA will redesignate it as Mixed Use on the Area Plan to accommodate an 
mixed use development, which may include residential, commercial, industrial, and 
entertainment uses.

Zone Change with Overlay 
Camelback Creek 
411th Avenue and Camelback Road 
Application Number: Z260019 
 
1st Submittal: April 10, 2026 
2nd Submittal: June 16, 2026 
Prepared by: 
Berry Riddell LLC 
Wendy Riddell, Esq. 
Sarah Sawyer, Esq. 
6750 E. Camelback Road, Suite 100 
Scottsdale, AZ 85251 
 
Prepared for: 
Arizona Land Consulting 
Anita Verma-Lallian 
7014 East Camelback Road, Suite 200 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

A. Executive Summary 
The purpose of this request is to seek a Zone Change with Overlay for approximately 320 
acres located at the northwest corner of 411th Avenue and Camelback Road, as shown 
below. The Site is presently zoned Rural-43 and designated as Rural on the 
Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan (the “Area Plan”), which plans for single family development 
with an average density of 1 du/ac. The intent is to rezone the Site to General Industrial 
with an Industrial Unit Plan Development overlay (“IND-2 IUPD”) to permit an industrial 
and employment center development, which may include data centers.  
 
Aerial Map 
B. Development Standards 
An IUPD is requested to modify the IND-2 development standards shown in the table 
below. The modification of the standards will allow for the flexibility of future industrial 
uses to accommodate changes in market demand, provide opportunities for employment 
to the surrounding community, and develop key public infrastructure.

Regulation 
Base Zoning District 
Regulations (IND-2) 
Proposed Zoning District 
Regulations (IND-2 IUPD) 
Maximum Height 
60 feet 
85 feet 
Minimum Front Yard 
20 feet 
20 feet 
Minimum Side Yard 
10 feet, except when abutting 
a rural or residential zoning 
district, then 25 feet 
None, except when abutting 
a rural or residential zoning 
district, then 25 feet 
Minimum Rear Yard 
10 feet, except when abutting 
a rural or residential zoning 
district, then 25 feet 
None, except when abutting 
a rural or residential zoning 
district, then 25 feet 
Minimum Lot Width 
60 feet 
60 feet 
Maximum Lot Coverage 
60% 
60% 
Parking Spaces 
Warehouse Uses: 1 space per 
900 square feet 
Warehouse/Data Center 
Uses: 1 space per 2,500 
square feet 
Screening 
6-foot solid wall  
6-foot solid wall  
8-foot solid wall when 
adjacent to a rural or 
residential zoning district 
 
IUPD Justification:  
Modifications to the development are requested to provide the flexibility necessary to 
attract a wide swath of industrial users, adapt to changes in the market, and be sensitive 
to the surrounding context. The request to increase the permitted height allowed by the 
IND-2 district from 40 feet to 85 feet. The increase in height will allow for the development 
of additional clearance, which is commonly sought by light industrial users.  
Additionally, we are requesting a reduction in the required parking for the Site. The Site 
will have a mix of warehouse and data center uses, both of which are subject to the same 
parking ratio. However, data centers typically contain only a small office space and fewer 
number of employees than warehouse uses and therefore, do not require as many 
employee parking spaces. Reducing the required parking for the Site reflects the current

parking demand for warehouse and data center uses and provides flexibility in the design 
of future development of the Site.  
C. Description of Proposal 
As shown below, the request is to rezone the Site from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD. The intent 
is to develop the Site as a Commerce Park, with industrial, employment, and data center 
uses. As no end users for the Site are identified at this time, the purpose of the IUPD 
overlay is to build flexibility into the entitlements, which will attract a diverse range of 
industrial users.  
 
Existing and Proposed Zoning  
D. Relationship to Surrounding Properties 
The Site is comprised of approximately 320 acres located at the northwest corner of 411th 
Avenue and Camelback Road. 419th Avenue runs along the west boundary of the Site and 
Missouri Avenue runs along the north boundary of the Site, but does not connect to 411TH 
Avenue to the east. To the north and east are large residential lots, many of which are 
undeveloped, with Rural-43 zoning. To the south, beyond Camelback Road, and to the 
west, beyond 419th Avenue, is vacant land zoned Rural-43. Further south, across the I-10, 
are existing industrial and commercial uses.

To offer a smooth transition from the proposed development to the residentially zoned 
properties to the north, a 50 foot landscape buffer is proposed along the north boundary. 
The landscape buffer will include screening elements and native landscaping, such as 
drought tolerant trees, shrubs, or natural vegetation.  
The current request responds to the nearby planned uses, such as the proposed Balterra 
mixed use development to the southeast, by offering synergistic future land uses. The 
current request, which seeks a Mixed Use Comprehensive Plan use designation, envisages 
residential, community serving commercial and employment, entertainment, and 
industrial uses appropriate in a rural setting with access to major transportation 
infrastructure. 
E. Location and Accessibility 
The Site is located adjacent to multiple existing and planned roadways. It sits at the 
northwest corner of 411th Avenue and Camelback Road, with frontages on both roadways. 
Additionally, the Site is adjacent to 419th Avenue to the west and Missouri Avenue to the 
north. Future access to the Site will be determined at the time of site planning. It should 
also be noted that the Site is in close proximity to the future Interstate-11 corridor, which 
is approximately 5 to 6 miles to the east of the Site. 
F. Circulation System 
The Site abuts Missouri Avenue to the north, 411th Avenue to the east, Camelback Road 
to the south, and 419th Avenue to the west, providing numerous options for access and 
circulation. It is anticipated that main access to the Site will be taken from 411th Avenue 
which currently has a traffic interchange at I-10. Specific access and circulation plans have 
not yet been finalized since no end users have been identified at this time; however, the 
intent is to provide a cohesive vehicular and pedestrian circulation system within the Site 
and extend and improve roadways providing access to the Site, as determined through

the site planning process. A traffic engineer will be engaged to study the traffic flows once 
end users are identified. 
G. Development Schedule/Phasing 
The intent is for the Site to be entitled in two phases. A General Comprehensive Plan 
Amendment (“CPA”) application is being submitted concurrently with this application to 
redesignate the Site as Mixed Use on the Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan. The current Zone 
Change with IUPD Overlay request and the General CPA application are the first phase of 
entitlements. Plan of Development applications will be submitted as end users for the Site 
are identified. The timing and phasing of development is to be determined.  
H. Community Facilities and Services  
Nearby school districts and schools include the Saddle Mountain Unified School District, 
Ruth Fischer Elementary School, and Tonopah Valley High School. The Site will be served 
by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office and will establish fire protection services during 
the site planning phase. The Site is located near a variety of outdoor recreational activities, 
including the White Tank Mountain Regional Park, the Bighorn Mountains Wilderness, 
ranches, and trails.  
I. Public Utilities and Services 
Water  
The Site is located within the Global Water – Belmont Water Company, Inc. (a part of 
Global Water Resources) service area. Currently no water infrastructure exists within the 
Site or adjacent right-of-way that would provide immediate connection. The nearest 
existing water system, owned by Global Water Resources, serves a small number of homes 
northwest of the Site near the intersection of Bethany Home Road and 419th Avenue. The 
Site’s footprint and anticipated development potential far exceed this existing water 
system, therefore it appears unlikely that interconnection to this system could serve the 
Site’s water needs. 
The potable and non-potable water demands at the Site may vary depending on the type 
of industrial use. It is anticipated that domestic, fire flow, production, and/or supplemental 
cooling water demands for the site will be met with onsite wells. A groundwater well 
within the Site area is owned by Cottonwood Creek LLC according to ADWR Record No. 
55-610549. Records for this well indicate it may have been previously equipped with 
substantial capacity including municipal/domestic use. This existing well and potential 
new wells will need to be evaluated for current suitability. We anticipate that a facility will

be constructed onsite to provide potable water storage, pumping capacity and any 
needed water quality treatment as determined by future well analyses. 
Wastewater  
The Site is located within the Global Water – Hassayampa Utilities Company, Inc. service 
area.  There are no existing sewer mains in the vicinity of the Site.  As the anticipated 
wastewater flows from the Site will vary depending on the type of industrial use, due to 
the size and anticipated land use of the site it will likely require connection to a municipal 
water reclamation facility (WRF) or onsite dedicated treatment plant. No receiving surface 
waters are adjacent to the site, so disposal of treated effluent would need to be achieved 
through some combination of process reuse of effluent, land application, and/or aquifer 
injection with an Aquifer Protection Permit (APP). Initial small-scale development may be 
served by individual septic system serving each building and/or parcel as an interim 
condition. 
Electric   
The project is located within the APS service area for electric. Currently, APS has a lower 
voltage service in the project vicinity.  Extending higher voltage for a heavier power user(s) 
will take more time. We expect to work with APS on a Feasibility Study to evaluate options 
for the Site and are currently working other options for power service, such as natural gas 
and other behind-the-meter solutions. 
Drainage and Grading 
The Site currently consists of undeveloped desert and agricultural land. The topography 
generally slopes south and is comprised of floodplain within the north half of the Site. The 
proposed use of drainage channels and placement of fill will allow for potential floodplain 
reclamation while largely preserving the historic flow patterns of the existing washes.  This 
approach, in combination with adherence to Maricopa County’s drainage design 
guidelines and the pending submittal of a CLOMR, helps to ensure no adverse stormwater 
impacts to adjacent properties. This approach also effectively increases the developable 
area and enhances the overall efficiency and flexibility of the site plan. 
J. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and 
Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan 
As previously mentioned, a companion General CPA application is being filed to 
redesignate the Site as Mixed Use on the Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan (the “Area Plan”). 
The rezoning request is also consistent with the Mixed Use designation in the

Comprehensive Plan, as discussed in greater detail below. For additional detail regarding 
how the proposal complies with the specific goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, 
please refer to the narrative in the companion General CPA application (CPA260008).  
The proposed amendment is consistent with the overall intent of the Maricopa County 
Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan (the “Comprehensive Plan”). The stated purpose of 
the Comprehensive Plan is to maintain a high quality of life for Maricopa County residents 
by protecting public health and safety, promoting stable economic growth, maintaining 
a healthy environment, providing adequate community services, and ensuring that tax 
money is spent efficiently. The Comprehensive Plan utilizes unifying vision and mission 
statements to achieve its stated purpose: 
A. Vision: Citizens serving citizens collaboratively, efficiently, and effectively. 
B. Mission: Provide regional leadership and fiscally responsible services for a healthy, 
safe community. 
C. Strategic Priorities: Safe communities, best-in-class regional services, efficient 
infrastructure, economic vitality, and fiscal stability.  
Maricopa County Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Site is also located within the 
Area Plan, which advances additional goals and policies designed to accommodate the 
growth anticipated in the area. These goals and policies relate to land use, transportation, 
the environment, and economic development.  
The intent of the Area Plan’s Mixed Use designation is to identify “locations of major 
employment centers” and permits uses such as “offices, light industrial parks, business 
parks, research parks, government facilities, post secondary educational facilities, 
hospitals and major medical facilities, and residential/retail uses” Maricopa County 
Tonopah/Arlington Area Plan.  
The proposed rezoning furthers the intent of the County’s Mixed Use designation. The 
Site is the ideal location for a future employment center with supportive residential, 
commercial, and entertainment uses, given its close proximity to major transportation 
infrastructure – the I-10. Additionally, the proposed rezoning advances goals of the 
Comprehensive Plan and the Area Plan by proposing uses that provide an opportunity for 
long-term and short-term employment opportunities, as anticipated by the Area Plan, 
while remaining respectful to the surrounding rural community.

K. Conclusion 
The purpose of this request is to seek an IND-2 Zone Change with IUPD Overlay for the 
approximate 320-acre property located at the northwest corner of 411th Avenue and 
Camelback Road. This request will permit the Site to develop as a mixed use development, 
which may include residential, commercial, industrial, and entertainment uses. The 
proposed rezoning will foster employment opportunities and public infrastructure 
improvements, contributing to economic growth in the region.

Anh Harambasic, PE 
Planning & Development 
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
Phone: (602) 506-3611 
www.maricopa.gov/planning 
email address: 
Anh.Harambasic@maricopa.gov 
  
Planning & Development 
 
Engineering Plan Review 
 
 
Date:    
May 18, 2026 
 
Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning & 
Development 
 
Attn: 
Andrew Lorentzen, Planner, Planning & Development Services 
 
via: 
Doug Jones P.E., Engineering Supervisor, Planning and Development 
 
From: 
Anh Harambasic P.E., Plans Examiner Engineer, Planning & 
Development 
 
Subject:   
Z260019 Rezone without a plan of development Camelback Creek 
APN(s): 
506-35-029A 
Description-Application is seeking a zone change with overlay from RU-43 to IND-2 
IUPD for approximately 320  acres located at the NWC of 411th Ave and Camelback 
Road.  This zone change with overlay was presented without a plan of development 
(POD).   
Engineering Review has reviewed the FIRST plan set routed for review on 4.30.2026 
and has no objections subject to the following stipulations: 
 
DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW  
 
1. This zone change request did not provide precise plans of development 
therefore further entitlement, a POD, is required to be approved prior to 
initiating building permits.   
2. A traffic impact study must accompany the POD.   
3. This site is located in a FEMA floodplain and must be designed to comply with 
Maricopa County floodplain regulations.   
 
The following general stipulations will apply: 
GENERAL DRAINAGE REVIEW/INFORMATION 
1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design 
only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with 
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and 
Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway 
Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices 
at the time of application for construction. 
 
2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes 
to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the 
site’s drainage infrastructure. 
 
3. Maricopa County does not supply water, fire or sewer services.  It is the 
applicant/owner’s responsibility to coordinate and secure water, fire and 
sewer services for this site.

Page 2 of 3 
 
 
 
 
4. Sealed final Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans and Sealed Final 
drainage report must be submitted with the application for Building Permits  
 
Please contact me with any questions. 
 
DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW REFERENCES:   
The Drainage Regulations are listed in Section 905 of the MCZO: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4785/Maricopa-County-Zoning-Ordinance-PDF 
Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards Manual: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2369  
For Additional Information See: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/1635/Drainage-Review 
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY REFERENCES:   
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/31723/Floodplain-Regulations-for-Maricopa-County-Final 
For Additional Information See: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/3847/Flood-Control-District  
PND TRANSPORTATION REFERENCES: 
Roadway Design Manual 
MCDOT Roadway Design Manual 
MCDOT General Notes for R/W Permits 
General Notes for R/W Permits 
Maricopa County Ordinance for Work in R/W 
MCDOT R/W Ordinance 
Residential Driveway Guidelines 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/315 
MCDOT Traffic Impact Study Manual 
TIS Manual 
For Additional Information See: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/156/MCDOT 
PND STORMWATER QUALITY (SWPPP) REFERENCES: 
Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge Control Regulation 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577 
Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 310 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5354  
For Additional Information See: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/3980/Water-Sewage-Stormwater-Waste 
Maricopa County Resolution for ROW Permits 
Transportation Construction Permit (TC) | Maricopa County, AZ 
For Additional Information See: 
Department of Transportation | Maricopa County, AZ 
 
Abbreviations Key: 
Drainage: 
DD =  
 
Department Directive (See: http://www.maricopa.gov/1911/Department-Directives) 
MCZO = Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance 
DPSM =  
Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards 
SSA =   
State Standard Attachment 
DDMV1=  
Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydrology 
DDMV2 =  
Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydraulics 
 
Flood Control: 
FRMC = Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County 
PND Transportation: 
RDM =  MCDOT Roadway Design Manual 
RDG =  MCDOT Residential Design Guidelines

Page 3 of 3 
 
 
 
MSRP =  
MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan 
PND Stormwater: 
SWMDCR= Maricopa County Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Regulation 
DDMV3=  
Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Erosion Control 
APCR= Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations – Rule 310

Engineering Division 
2901 W. Durango Street 
Phoenix, Arizona 85009 
P: 602.506.4889 
F: 602.506.5969 
 
 
MCDOT Planning TAC Comments 
Date: 6/2/2026 
TAC Assigned Number: Z260019 
APN: 506-35-029A 
Description of Request: General CPA to change the designated land use listed in the 
Tonopah/Arlington. Area Plan to Mixed Use and a zone change with overlay from. Rural-43 to IND-
2 IUPD 
Project Name: Camelback Creek 
Reviewer Contact Information 
For any questions related to the comments herein please contact MCDOTPlanning@maricopa.gov 
or 602-506-4619. 
1st Submittal Comments 
• The three items below require, at applicant’s expense, an American Land Title Association 
(“ALTA”) Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance showing title vested in Maricopa County, a 
political subdivision of the State of Arizona.  
o 419th Avenue is classified as a rural major collector requiring fee dedication of a 40-
foot half street from the section line per the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance 
Section 804. 
o Camelback Road is classified as an urban principal arterial requiring fee 
dedication of a 65-foot half street from the section line per the Maricopa County 
Zoning Ordinance Section 804. 
o 411th Avenue is classified as an urban parkway typically requiring 100- feet to be 
dedicated in fee. At this time the applicant will only be required to dedicate in fee 65-
feet per the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Section 804 and preserve an 
additional 35-feet per the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Section 805 to 
accommodate the required 100-feet total half street.  
• It is the developer's responsibility to determine if the existing right of way is fee simple, if it 
is not then the developer will need to provide the right of way in said form.  
• Dedication shall be completed by time of permit approval or after 6 months after BOS 
Approval if no MCDOT or PND permit is required.   
• The above comments do not include identification of utilities or underground facilities 
within or adjacent to the required right-of-way that may have prior rights and/or require 
relocation.  
• Any additional dedication and offsite improvement requirements will be determined by 
MCDOT Traffic based on a submitted TIA/TIS and the above roadway classifications.

Engineering Division 
2901 W. Durango Street 
Phoenix, Arizona 85009 
P: 602.506.4889 
F: 602.506.5969 
Z260019 
6/2/2026 
Page 2 
 
 
 
o If a TIA/TIS has been previously submitted, approval is valid for one year. If review 
for construction is not underway within this time period, MCDOT may request an 
updated traffic report to assess any changes in condition.  
• A mid-section line alignment is located on the northern perimeter of the proposed 
development requiring the setback line to start from a future half street Right-of-Way of 40-
feet per the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Section 805.

Page | 1  
 
 
Subdivision 
Infrastructure  
& Planning Program 
301 W. Jefferson St. 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
S u b d i vi s io n @ m a ri co p a .go v 
e s d .m a r i c o pa .g o v 
 
 
 
 
 
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has completed review 
for the Camelback Creek planning case(s). Please note the following MCESD requirements 
for site development: 
 
Onsite Wastewater (Septic) –  
A Notice of Intent to Discharge application for a septic system is required for any 
construction. Application must be submitted to the MCESD Onsite Wastewater Program. 
• 
Wastewater is not permitted to discharge to an adjacent parcel’s septic system. 
• 
If conducting food service in unincorporated Maricopa, a grease trap will be 
required by Onsite Wastewater program. 
• 
Setback requirements must be maintained per Arizona Administrative Code, Title 
18, Chapter 9, Article 312, C (Features Requiring Setbacks). 
 
Projected flows between 3,000 and 24,000 gallons per day require a 4.23 General Permit 
and may require nitrogen treatment. 
 
If the wastewater flow exceeds 24,000 gpd or if an activated sludge treatment process is to 
be used, then a wastewater treatment plant may be required. 
• 
Additionally, an Individual Permit through the Arizona Department of 
Environmental Quality (ADEQ) may be required. 
• 
Please contact the Water/Wastewater Treatment Program at (602) 372-2861 or 
email treatmentplantprogram@maricopa.gov for additional information. 
 
For Onsite Wastewater related questions, please contact the Onsite Program at (602) 506-
6666 or by email at septicquestions@maricopa.gov. 
 
Project Name: Camelback Creek 
Primary Contact Name: Wendy Riddell 
Planning Application Type: Zone Change 
with Overlay 
APN(s): 506-35-029A 
Reviewer: Syed Alam, P.E. 
Email: syed.alam@maricopa.gov 
Phone: 602-879-4969 
Planner Name: Andrew Lorentzen 
Planning Case #: Z260019 
Date: May 28, 2026 
 
Water and Waste Management Division

Page | 2  
 
 
Drinking Water –  
Per the Safe Drinking Water Act, any water system that supplies more than 25 people or 15 
service connections per day for at least 60 days per year is classified as a Public Water 
System (PWS).  
• 
If the above criteria are met, a Public Water System application and a New Source 
Approval application are required and must be submitted to the MCESD’s Drinking 
Water Program. A water quality analysis report will be required with submittal and is 
good within one-year of testing. 
 
An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the MCESD’s Treatment 
Program for all PWS water treatment facilities. 
• 
For questions, please contact the Water/Wastewater Treatment Program at (602) 
372-2861 or email treatmentplantprogram@maricopa.gov 
 
An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the MCESD’s 
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for all PWS water system infrastructure. 
• 
For questions, please contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure Program at (602) 
506-1058 or email subdivision@maricopa.gov 
 
For additional Drinking Water related questions, please contact the Drinking Water program 
at (602) 506-6935 or by email at sdwquestions@maricopa.gov. 
 
Subdivision Infrastructure and Planning –  
An Approval to Construct application is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s 
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for water, reclaimed water and/or wastewater system 
infrastructure. 
 
A Water Service Agreement signed by the Utility is required and must be submitted to 
MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development will be provided with 
water and/or reclaimed water by a Utility.  A Capacity Assurance Form issued by the Utility 
is required to MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development 
wastewater service is being provided by a Utility. 
 
For subdivision related questions, please contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure 
Program at (602) 506-1058 or email subdivision@maricopa.gov. 
 
Water/Wastewater Treatment –  
An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the Water/Wastewater 
Treatment Program for all wastewater treatment facilities.

Page | 3  
 
 
An Aquifer Protection Permit (APP) is required for all new wastewater treatment facilities or 
existing wastewater treatment facilities being modified.  The Arizona Department of 
Environmental Quality (ADEQ) reviews, approves and issues APPs. 
• 
Please contact ADEQ’s Groundwater Protection Program at (602) 771-4999 or email 
azpdes@azdeq.gov for additional information about this requirement. 
 
An Arizona Pollution Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) permit is required for 
discharges to the ‘Waters of the United States’.  The ADEQ reviews, approves and issues 
AZPDES permits. 
• 
Please contact ADEQ’s Surface Water Protection Program at (602) 771-1440 or 
email azpdes@azdeq.gov for additional information about this requirement. 
Note: 
• 
A MAG 208 certification or amendment may be required if an AZPDES discharge is 
implemented or modified. 
o Please contact MAG’s Water Quality Advisory Committee at (602) 254-6300 
or email mag@azmag.gov for additional information about this 
requirement. 
 
A Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) 208 plan certification is required if the new 
wastewater facility/system is not already identified in the existing MAG 208 plan.  The MAG 
reviews and approves MAG 208 plan certifications. 
• 
Please contact MAG’s Water Quality Advisory Committee at (602) 254-6300 or 
email mag@azmag.gov for additional information about this requirement. 
Note: 
• 
A MAG 208 certification must be obtained prior to an Approval To Construct 
application being submitted to the MCESD’s Treatment Program. 
 
An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the Water/Wastewater 
Treatment Program for all reuse facilities. 
A Reclaimed Water Permit is required for all new reuse facilities or existing reuse facilities 
being modified.  The ADEQ reviews, approves and issues Reclaimed Water permits. 
• 
Please contact ADEQ’s Water Reuse Program by email at waterreuse@azdeq.gov 
for additional information about this requirement. 
 
For treatment related questions, please contact the Water/Wastewater Treatment Program 
at (602) 372-2861 or email treatmentplantprogram@maricopa.gov. 
 
Additional Notes –  
*It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project. Comments are provided 
for the benefit of the applicant for MCESD permit requirements and as an advisory to Maricopa County 
Planning and Development Department. Other Maricopa County agencies may have additional 
requirements. Final review and approval will be made through Planning and Development Department

Page | 4  
 
 
procedures. Applicant may need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental 
Services Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department. Review of any such 
application will be based on current regulations at the time of application.

From: STOPP
PO Box 1075
Tonopah, A285354
Date: July 20,2026
To: Andrerv [-orentzen
Planner
andrew.lorentzen@ maricopa.gov
Maricopa County Planning & Development Department
301 W. Jefferson St.
Suite 170
Phoenix,AZ 85003
Re: Case #2260019 Camelback CreeK
Dear Mr. [.orentzen
Support Tonopah Opportunities, Progress, & Preservation (STOPP), Inc. is a non-profit
organization o'committed to protecting the communal and social well being for the Community of
Tonopah..." 'Wb have reviewed the documents related to Camelback Creek, Case # Z2ffi0l9,to
rezone to the properry from Rural43 to IND-2IUPD, which proposed light industrial spaces,
distribution warehousing and retail commercial-
We support the proposed change and especially welcome retail commercial development
As we have indicated on other zoning cases, we are concerned with the traffic on 41lth Avenue
I-10 interstate overpass. Baekup onto the overpass is unpredictable and a generic study or one
day visit isn't representative, so we want to continue to alert of this problem as developments go
through the planning and development process.
Sincerely
Daniel E. Blackson
STOPP,Inc. Chairman
Ed Reichenberg
STOPP Board Members
Cc: