12.SU24005 BOS REPORT.PDF

Report to the Board of Supervisors
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Board Hearing Date: October 21, 2026
Case #/Title: SU240005 – Cielo By Legends
Supervisorial District: 5
Applicant/Owner: Bianca Cano & Heather Brakefield / Vanessa G Montes
Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for event venue in the Rural-43 zoning
district
Site Location: Generally located 350’ SE of the SEC of 38th Ave. & Calle Poco,
south of Carver Rd. in the Laveen / south Phoenix area
Site Size: Approximately 4.16 acres
County Island Status: Yes (City of Phoenix)
Additional Comments:
 The applicant is requesting to utilize an existing residential parcel for a wedding and events
venue. The case was scheduled and continued from June 11th and July 23rd before finally being
heard at the September 10, 2026 Commission hearing. At the September 10th hearing the
applicant again requested continuance but after consideration the Commission determined it
was in the best interest of the neighborhood to hear the case and to make a recommendation to
the Board.
 The parcel utilizes an on-site septic system for wastewater disposal and is served water via a well
shared with neighboring parcels. An immediate neighbor opposed to the SUP provided easement
language indicating the shared well is not eligible for commercial use.
 The site is accessed from 38th Ave., an unimproved, dead-end local street with canal crossing. It
is maintained by the private property owners. 38th Ave. Site access is staff’s chief concern with
a commercial use at the subject site.
 Staff has received nine letters in opposition to the SUP – this includes opposition from all
neighbors immediately adjacent to the site. Their concerns are noise, access, traffic, public
safety, and loss of rural community. Staff has received 25 items of support.
 A super-majority vote (four affirmative) has been triggered for SUP approval. This is required
when 20% or more of surrounding property owners within a 300’ radius, by both number and area,
have registered opposition. The opposition received accounts for 8 property owners with an area
of 3,245,563 sq. ft. which equates to: 69% opposed by number, and 96% opposed by area.
October 21, 2026
SU240005
Page 1 of 3

Commission
Recommendation: On 9/10/26, the Commission voted 7-0 (motion by Commissioner
Rochwalik D3, seconded by Commissioner Toma D4) to adopt a
motion recommending the Board of Supervisors deny SU240005.
In the event the Board motions for approval of SU240005, staff
suggests conditions ‘a’ – ‘n’:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled
“Cielo By Legends Special Use Permit“, consisting of 3 sheets, dated February 15, 2025,
except as modified by the following conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Cielo By Legends”, consisting of 7 pages, dated February 12, 2025, and stamped,
except as modified by the following conditions.
c. This special use permit is valid for a period of five years and shall expire on October 21,
2031, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more consecutive days,
whichever occurs first.
d. Events shall be limited to Friday – Sunday (and major calendar holidays), 8:00 am - 10:00
pm.
e. At least one (1) employee must be on site at all times during scheduled events. The name
and telephone number of the employee must be posted and identified at the entrance to
the site and available to the neighbors and responding officers at all times during
scheduled events.
f. Lighting must be fully shielded so that light is emitted downward no less directed than 20
degrees below the horizontal plane at the bottom of the light fixture, and shall not exceed
1,000 lumens as measured outside the special use permit boundary, and shall be shut off
by 10:00pm nightly.
g. There shall be no outdoor amplified noise. Noise shall not exceed 55 decibels as
measured outside the SUP boundary.
h. The following Engineering conditions shall apply:
1. For building permit issuance, the retention basin must provide 1-foot of freeboard. If a
berm is used to provide freeboard, it must be a minimum of 8-feet wide and have a
defined weir outfall.
2. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All
development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for
construction. All plans and reports should be developed and formatted to document
that the project is designed to meet all County regulations, ordinances and design
standards. It is incumbent upon the engineer to demonstrate compliance with all
regulatory requirements and County design standards.
i. Prior to occupying any building or any portion thereof for any public assembly use
associated with the Special Use Permit, the applicant shall obtain a commercial
October 21, 2026
SU240005
Page 2 of 3

construction permit meeting applicable commercial building code requirements and shall
obtain a Certificate of Occupancy authorizing public assembly.
j. Prior to issuance of a building permit or operation of the facility, written confirmation will
be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the
facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that
emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the
certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be
required.
k. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Special Use
Permit by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in
accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County
Zoning Ordinance.
l. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant,
with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application,
subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the
time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property may be considered for revocation
to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed
that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of
the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application
to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value
of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or
expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the
property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to
the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had
never been granted.
m. The owner shall maintain 38th Ave. from Carver Rd. to the site including dust-proofing.
n. The owner shall submit construction permit/s to establish the land use and for site
improvements as shown on the site plan and receive final inspection status from Planning
& Development Department Inspections Division establishing the use prior to the
operation of business. Violation of this condition may be grounds for revocation as set
forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
Presented by: Andrew Lorentzen, Planner
Reviewed by: Darren Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager
Attachment: 9/10/26 P&Z Packet (47 pages)
New Support Letters (25 pages)
Note: 9/10/26 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can be
provided upon request later, or accessed via Agenda Center, when available.
October 21, 2026
SU240005
Page 3 of 3

Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
* Denotes changes from the July 23, 2026 report
Case: SU240005 – Cielo By Legends
Hearing Date: September 10, 2026 (Continued from June 11 and July 23, 2026)
Supervisor District: 5
Applicants: Bianca Cano / Heather Brakefield
Owner: Vanessa G Montes
Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for event venue in the Rural-43 zoning district
Site Location: Generally located 350’ SE of the SEC of 38th Ave. & Calle Poco, south of
Carver Rd. in the Laveen / south Phoenix area
Site Size: Approximately 4.16 acres
Density: N/A
County Island: Yes (City of Phoenix)
County Plan: Rural Development Area (RDA)
Municipal Plan: City of Phoenix – Large Lot (0-1 d.u./a.c.)
Municipal Comments: None received to date
Support/Opposition: 1 in support / 8 in opposition
Recommendation: Denial
SU240005
Page 1 of 12

Project Summary:
1. The applicants are requesting to establish a Special Use Permit (SUP) for an event venue for up
to 150 guests on an approximate 4.16-acre parcel in the Rural-43 zoning district in the south
Phoenix area. The site is located at the end of 38th Ave., which is a private roadway that has been
improved by the local property owners. The application is for an existing indoor and outdoor venue
with a 3,500 sq. ft. indoor event space (behind an existing single-family residence) and a large
landscaped yard to hold events and ceremonies. A 79-space parking area (with three ADA spaces)
has been created on the western downhill side of the parcel near the site entrance. The venue is
located on a hill. A staircase is planned to be installed to connect the parking area to the event
yard and venue building. The site is on a hill adjacent to South Mountain Park with no residential
neighbors to the south or east up the slope. There are immediate residential neighbors down
slope to the north and west.
2. The application does not limit the days of the week or times of proposed events only indicating
that all events will be completed by 10:00 pm in conjunction with local noise ordnances. The
applicant specifically states that the events will primarily be held on weekends to accommodate
wedding events but will not be limited to weekends, and exact dates and times will be a case-by-
case basis. The venue will employ varying numbers of staff which will be determined by each
event size and scope though generally it is anticipated that 5-6 event staff will be present per
event. The application speaks of bedroom availability in the main house structure which can
accommodate up to 8 guests. Staff notes that the application presented is not for overnight
accommodation purposes for the event venue, though the owner still has the right to utilize the
residence for short-term rental uses (j.e. use by the bridal party) but not for public assembly
related to events.
3. Zoning violation V202102351 was opened December 14, 2021 due to citizen complaints of a
commercial business (wedding venue) without proper zoning entitlement in residential zone and
unpermitted construction (including grading of the parking area). A hearing officer’s order of
judgment was issued against the property on January 11, 2024 indicating the owner was
responsible for the zoning violations. The subject SUP application was submitted on July 10,
2024. A technical advisory committee was held on August 20, 2024.
4. On May 6, 2025 staff met with the applicant and development team to discuss ongoing issues
with the application and to help move the application forward. At this meeting staff indicated the
need for fire department review and determination that there was adequate access for emergency
response to a commercial / public assembly use. Staff asked the applicant to address with
surrounding neighbors the utilization of private roadway easements for access to a commercial
use. Fire safety and access remain staff’s chief concern.
5. * On October 21, 2025 staff followed up with the applicant due to an extended period of inactivity
and set a deadline of January 1, 2026 for submittal of revised. The applicant resubmitted the case
on December 24, 2025. Upon review the resubmitted case material did not include
correspondence with the fire department nor neighbors regarding roadway access. The applicant
provided subsequently provided a ‘statement of road maintenance responsibility’ indicating they
would repair or maintain the roadway access. By May 2026 had still not provided the requested
fire safety letter, but since the SUP is a remedy to the long-standing zoning violation, the case was
scheduled for the June 11, 2026 and July 23, 2026 Commission hearings. Staff recommends
denial due to the outstanding fire and access issues.
SU240005
Page 2 of 12

Aerial photo of subject site
Aerial image – site and environs
SU240005
Page 3 of 12

Aerial image – site and environs
Eagle view of subject site looking north/downhill into subject parcel (aerial image dated January 2024)
SU240005
Page 4 of 12

Site Plan
Site Photos provided by applicant
SU240005
Page 5 of 12

Photo of corner of Carver Rd. & 38th Ave. access bridge
SU240005
Page 6 of 12

Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use:
6. On-site: Rural-43 / Residential
North: Rural-43 / Residential
South: City of Phoenix / Vacant - Undeveloped
East: City of Phoenix / Vacant - Undeveloped
West: Rural-43 / Residential
Zoning District map
Utilities and Services:
7. Water: Shared Well
Wastewater: Septic
School Districts: Laveen Elementary School District, Phoenix Union High School District
Fire: Laveen Fire District
Police: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Right-of-Way:
8. The following table includes existing and proposed half-width right-of-way and the future
classification based upon the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Major
Streets and Routes Plan.
SU240005
Page 7 of 12

Street Name Half-width Existing R/W Half-width Proposed R/W Future Classification
Carver Rd. 22’ 22’ Minor Collector
Immediate access to the parcel is from 38th Ave. which is comprised of a series of private access
easements. The nearest public right-of-way is along Carver Rd. The 38th Ave. easement serves 27
residential lots.
Adopted Plans:
9. Maricopa County Framework 2040 (Updated May – Rural Development Area: The county’s
comprehensive plan designates the county island in the south Phoenix area as an Area of
Municipal / Urban Influence. The City of Phoenix serves water to the area, thus there is potential
for an urban level of services for urban intensity uses. However, the subject site is served water
via shared well and wastewater via onsite septic system – at this time the site is within a rural
services area.
10. City of Phoenix General Plan 2025 (Updated 1/21/26): This general plan designates the site as
large lot with - 0-1 dwelling units per acre.
Public Participation Summary:
11. The application was submitted on July 10, 2024. Neighbor notification was mailed out to all
landowners within 300’ of the property at that time. Upon application, a sign posting example was
provided by the applicant. At the TAC meeting on August 20, 2024, staff learned that the signs
were not posted yet and staff requested signs to be posted at the entrance to the property and in
the right-of-way along Carver Rd. for visibility. The application lingered with only engineering
documents being submitted and minimal correspondence from the applicant during this time.
12. * In May 2025 staff met with the applicant regarding development and engineering requirements,
staff indicated any new submission would require proof of site posting. Minor engineering
changes were submitted though no formal resubmission was received during this period. On
October 21, 2025 staff gave an ultimatum to either provide a full resubmittal or close the case by
the end of the year. When the applicant finally resubmitted it in December 2025 the submission
items included sign posting images that did not meet Maricopa County sign size standards for
type of sign material or size required and indicated as posted on December 7, 2025. While not
meeting required size, the signs did generate public inquiry on the case and were posted in the
locations desired by staff. Staff requested correct sign posting be updated which they were ten
days later on December 17, 2025. Signs were updated with today’s hearing information and
posted on May 14, 2026.
13. The applicant held a community meeting on site on October 6, 2025. A sign-in sheet indicates
there were approximately 20 individuals in attendance. The provided public participation plan
indicates a discussion of concerns with local neighbors but does not indicate any determined
outcomes of the meeting or provide any suggestions for remediation practices.
14. Staff has received eight letters of opposition from neighbors regarding impacts from continued
venue operation including noise, hours of operation, trash, lighting, and roadway concerns. A letter
of support was provided by an Arizona House of Representatives member from District 26, Cesar
Aguilar and Quanta Crews which speak to the owners other wedding venue business at other
SU240005
Page 8 of 12

locations and the character of the commercial operation but does not speak on the current
application or the subject parcel of discussion.
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies:
15. Planning staff is concerned with a commercial event venue accessed via a long, narrow local
street serving 26 residential lots. Staff is concerned with access for fire and emergency response
to a public assembly venue at this location. Staff recommends denial due to these fire/emergency
response and access concerns.
*
Staff Analysis:
16. Staff maintains concern about the proposed wedding venue location. The proposal does not
adequately address access and public safety. Immediate neighbors are concerned with adverse
impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
17. The site is at the dead-end of a private ingress/egress easement along the 38th Ave. alignment.
The roadway condition is rough with asphalt millings not rolled or that have degraded to that
appearance. The corner of 38th Ave. & Carver Rd. is a large irrigation canal that runs along the
south side of Carver Rd. The canal crossing is a concrete bridge approximately 30’ in width. It is
unknown if this crossing allows for adequate emergency response to the site. The applicant has
not provided written confirmation and staff has not received comment from the fire agency
having jurisdiction. Staff routed the initial application to the City of Phoenix and advised the
applicant to discuss the project with the Laveen Fire District.
18. Staff has further concern with this segment of 38th Ave., a series of private access easements,
providing access to a commercial use through a rural residential neighborhood and its impact on
the neighborhood. Staff requested the applicant meet with property owners along the roadway
in order for the applicant to execute access and maintenance agreements to limit roadway
degradation. A neighborhood meeting did occur but to date no roadway agreement has been
executed. The applicant has provided a ‘statement of road maintenance responsibility’ formatted
as an open letter to the community and assumes responsibility for the maintenance of 38th Ave.
SU240005
Page 9 of 12

from Carver Rd. to the subject property. While the statement does imply improvements it is not
an agreement between the landowners which would require improvement or repair.
19. The parcel uniquely sits on a hill on the side of a small valley. The current home is prominently
located above the majority of the surrounding neighbors. While the site may be an asset for views
and photography during events the location will ultimately cause any unfiltered and especially
amplified noise into the valley below. Staff recommends limiting all amplified noise to indoor use
only with a maximum decibel volume at the parcel boundary.
20. The parcel is the subject of open and verified zoning violation for unentitled land use and
unpermitted construction. The latter includes grading of the parking area and the renovation of a
garage building into the event venue building. The venue building will be required to obtain
building renovation permits that certify public occupancy is allowed prior to operating the event
venue business on the property. The residence will be permitted for short-term rental but will also
require commercial permitting if any public assembly is proposed.
21. Neighbor opposition to the proposal has been present since prior to the SUP application.
Neighbors have routinely contacted planning and code enforcement staff to complain of ongoing
events and event venue operations. There is no known support from the local neighborhood.
22. The subject parcel is part of a shared well agreement that does not allow for commercial use of
the well. This private agreement is a civil matter between landowners. However, staff notes the
submitted plan relies on the existing well infrastructure and no alternative water options are
proposed for the commercial use.
23. Staff is concerned with the venue’s ability to operate in a way that does not adversely impact the
surrounding residential neighborhood with regard to noise, lighting, traffic and public safety. The
topography of the valley and the location of the parcel make it prominent feature on the hillside.
24. While the use does not warrant roadway improvements per MCDOT, a 79-space parking area
indicates far greater traffic volume along the private roadway easement than currently exists for
a single-family residence. The residential neighborhood should not bear burden of road
degradation and for roadway maintenance to the commercial use.
25. * The applicant requested continuance from June 11th and then from July 23rd to today’s hearing.
Staff requested the applicant provided updated public notice materials, but the applicant did not
do so. Staff did conduct public notice based on the previously provided materials. No new
information has been provided by the applicant, and staff’s analysis is unchanged.
Recommendation:
26. For the reasons outlined in this report, staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion that
the Board of Supervisors deny SU240005.
27. However, if the Commission choses to adopt a motion to recommend approval, staff offers the
following conditions ‘a’ – ‘n’ for consideration:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled
“Cielo By Legends Special Use Permit“, consisting of 3 sheets, dated February 15, 2025,
except as modified by the following conditions.
SU240005
Page 10 of 12

b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Cielo By Legends”, consisting of 7 pages, dated February 12, 2025, and stamped,
except as modified by the following conditions.
c. This special use permit is valid for a period of five years and shall expire on October 21,
2031, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more consecutive days,
whichever occurs first.
d. Events shall be limited to Friday – Sunday (and major calendar holidays), 8:00 am - 10:00
pm.
e. At least one (1) employee must be on site at all times during scheduled events. The name
and telephone number of the employee must be posted and identified at the entrance to
the site and available to the neighbors and responding officers at all times during
scheduled events.
f. Lighting must be fully shielded so that light is emitted downward no less directed than 20
degrees below the horizontal plane at the bottom of the light fixture, and shall not exceed
1,000 lumens as measured outside the special use permit boundary, and shall be shut off
by 10:00pm nightly.
g. There shall be no outdoor amplified noise. Noise shall not exceed 55 decibels as
measured outside the SUP boundary.
h. The following Engineering conditions shall apply:
1. For building permit issuance, the retention basin must provide 1-foot of freeboard. If a
berm is used to provide freeboard, it must be a minimum of 8-feet wide and have a
defined weir outfall.
2. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All
development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for
construction. All plans and reports should be developed and formatted to document
that the project is designed to meet all County regulations, ordinances and design
standards. It is incumbent upon the engineer to demonstrate compliance with all
regulatory requirements and County design standards.
i. Prior to occupying any building or any portion thereof for any public assembly use
associated with the Special Use Permit, the applicant shall obtain a commercial
construction permit meeting applicable commercial building code requirements and shall
obtain a Certificate of Occupancy authorizing public assembly.
j. Prior to issuance of a building permit or operation of the facility, written confirmation will
be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the
facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that
emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the
certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be
required.
SU240005
Page 11 of 12

k. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Special Use
Permit by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in
accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County
Zoning Ordinance.
l. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant,
with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application,
subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the
time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property may be considered for revocation
to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed
that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of
the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application
to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value
of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or
expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the
property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to
the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had
never been granted.
m. The owner shall maintain 38th Ave. from Carver Rd. to the site including dust-proofing.
n. The owner shall submit construction permit/s to establish the land use and for site
improvements as shown on the site plan and receive final inspection status from
Planning & Development Department Inspections Division establishing the use prior to
the operation of business. Violation of this condition may be grounds for revocation as
set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
Presented by: Andrew Lorentzen, Planner
Reviewed by: Rachel Applegate, Planning Supervisor
Attachments: Case Map (1 page)
Site Plan (3 pages)
Narrative Report (7 pages)
Engineering Comments (3 pages)
MCDOT comments (1 page)
Support Letter (2 pages)
Opposition Letters (17 pages)
300’ Support & Opposition Map (1 page)
SU240005
Page 12 of 12

Application Name: Cielo by Legends
Legal Description
1S-2E-15
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
4806873606
Kathleen Heather Brakefield
SU240005
Case Address Parcel Primary:300-09-014A
3801 W CARVER RD LAVEEN, AZ 85339
LAVEEN, AZ 85339
Generated May 13, 2026 11:51 AM Gross Acres: 4 approx. Map scale 1:1,066
Supervisor District No. 5
Request for an event venue and bed and breakfast.
/
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ

ARCHITECTURE | PLANNING | DESIGN
CIELO BY LEGENDS - SPECIAL USE PERMIT
3801 W CARVER RD
LAVEEN VILLAGE, AZ 85339
APN: 300-09-014A
ABBREVIATIONS W CALLE
POCO
ABC AGGREGATE BASE COURSE MICRO MICROWAVE OVEN
A.F.F. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR N.E.C. NATIONAL ELECTRIC
CODE
C.I. CAST IRON
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE
C.M.U. CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
O.A. OVER ALL 38th
DW DISHWASHER AVE.
O.C. ON CENTER S
F.O.P. FACE OF POST
P.E.N. PERIMETER EDGE
F.O.S. FACE OF STUD NAILING
3801 W CARVER
F.F. FINISHED FLOOR PTDF PRESSURE TREATED RD SITE
DOUGLAS FIR
FG FIBER GLASS
P.L.F. PER LINEAR FOOT
FLUOR. FLUORESCENT (FIXTURE)
REF REFRIGERATOR VICINITY MAP
F.V. FIELD VERIFY
R RISER (ie 16R=16 RISERS) S 38th
GSM GALVANIZED SHEET METAL AVE.
SPECS. SPECIFICATIONS 85339
GFI GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT
SS STAINLESS STEEL
GYP. BD. GYPSUM BOARD SCOPE OF WORK GENERAL CODE SUMMARY
TEMP. TEMPERED GLASS
I.B.C. INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE
AZ
TC TRASH COMPACTOR
I.C.C. INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR AN OUTDOOR EVENT VENUE. BUILDING CODE DESIGN DATA - ALL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN MARICOPA RD
TYP. TYPICAL COUNTY SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CODES AND
I.F.C. INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE AMENDMENTS PER THEIR ADOPTED ORDINANCES:
U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE 2018 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE
I.M.C. INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE NOTED 2018 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE LEGENDS
2018 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE
I.P.C. INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE WC WATER CLOSET LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2018 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE VILLAGE,
2018 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE CARVER
I.R.C. INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE WP WATER PROOF 2018 INTERNATIONAL GREEN CONSTRUCTION CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE
A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 1
MFR. MANUFACTURER WI WROUGHT IRON 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA DESIGN CRITERIA BY
• GROUND SNOW LOAD = 0 W
• SITE CLASS = D
• SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY = B LAVEEN
GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES • Ss = 0.16 S1 = 0.06 CIELO
• SOIL BEARING CAPACITY = 1500 3801
• WIND LOAD = 115 MPH BASIC WIND SPEED
1. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE A INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH ARE THE • WIND EXPOSURE = C
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT.
2. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN
CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON FUTURE PROJECTS. THE CONTACT LIST ZONING CODE ANALYSIS
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS CONTAINED WITHIN THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND ARE PROTECTED UNDER COPYRIGHT LAWS.
3. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THOSE CLIENT: CIVIL ENGINNER: PROJECT TYPE:
AGENCIES IN AUTHORITY IN THE DISTRICT OF THE MARICOPA COUNTY.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK USING HIS/HER BEST VANESS MONTES RENE BERMUDEZ, PE LOT AREA: 181,556 SF
SKILL AND ATTENTION. THE SITE VISITS OF THE ARCHITECT AND HIS/HER A: 3801 W CARVER RD, VICTORIA ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, LLC. LOT COVERAGE: 3%
CONSULTANTS ARE NOT FOR PURPOSE OF REVIEWING OF CONSTRUCTION LAVEEN, AZ 85339 USA
TECHNIQUE METHODS, SYSTEMS OR SAFETY, BUT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PHONE: 623-910-7826 1800 W COLTER ST SITE APN: 300-09-014A
ASSURING THAT THE WORK IS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE EMAIL: cazarezsta@gmail.com PHOENIX, AZ 85015
DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION PHONE: 480.252.9282 ZONING: RU-43
MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, PROCEDURES, SCHEDULES AND FOR ARCHITECT: EMAIL: INFO@VICTORIAENGINEERING.NET
COORDINATING ALL WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. THE WORK SHALL BE MAIN BUILDING
COMPLETED TO THE BEST STANDARDS OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FOR THE KATHLEEN H BRAKEFIELD SETBACKS: (SEE SITE PLAN)
TYPE OF WORK BEING DONE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE KHB ARCHITECTURE STUDIOS, PLLC
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ALL WORK THAT IS INTEGRAL TO THIS PROJECT 3867 E. PALMER STREET • FRONT: 40'-0"
THAT IS NOT EXPLICITLY DEFINED, OR DETAILED BY THE CONSTRUCTION GILBERT, AZ 85298 • SIDE: 30'-0" FOR: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
DOCUMENTS. ALL WORK NOT EXPLICITLY DEFINED, BUT BY COMMON STANDARDS PHONE:(707) 454-6513 • REAR: 40'-0"
AND PRACTICES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IS REQUIRED, SHALL BE EMAIL: HEATHER@KHBARCHSTUDIOS.COM • STREET SIDE : 40'-0"
REV # DATE
ASSUMED TO BE PART OF THIS PROJECT. ALL MATERIALS NOT SPECIFIED AS TO THE • MAX. HEIGHT: 30'-0"
MANUFACTURER, MODEL OR GRADE, SHALL BE SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN • MIN. DISTANCE BTN BLDG: 00'-0"
ASSOCIATION WITH THE OWNER AND THEY SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS
ADEQUACY AND APPROPRIATENESS. EXISTING RESIDENCE: 2,332 SF
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INITIATING, MAINTAINING AND (3 SLEEPING ROOMS)
SUPERVISING ALL SAFETY PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK ON THIS PUBLIC ASSEMBLY SPACE: 4,771 SF
PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ERECT AND MAINTAIN AS REQUIRED BY EXISTING PATIO: 416 SF
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROGRESS OF THE WORK, ALL REASONABLE SAFE -----------------------------------------------------------
GUARDS FOR SAFETY AND PROTECTION AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE SHEET INDEX TOTAL GSF: 7,519 SF
LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC
AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE SAFETY OF PERSONS OR PROPERTY OR THEIR LIGHTING ZONE 1
PROTECTION FROM DAMAGE, INJURY OR LOSS.
Current
FLOOD ZONE 'X'
INTERPRETATIONS OF DRAWING AND SPECIFICATIONS Sheet Sheet Issue Current Revision
Number Sheet Name Date Revision Date
A. FOR CONVENIENCE SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT IN A
SEPARATE MANUAL, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND ARE ARRANGED IN A NUMBER OF
SECTIONS. BUT SUCH SEPARATION OF SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED 0000 COVER SHEET 2/12/25
AS THE LIMITS TO THE WORK REQUIRED OF ANY SEPARATE TRADE. THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF ANY SUCH LIMITATIONS ARE SOLELY BETWEEN THE GENERAL A000 SITE PLAN 2/12/25
CONTRACTOR AND THE SUBCONTRACTOR.
P-1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 2/12/25
B. AS NO SPECIFIC PORTION OF WORK IN THIS PROJECT IS INDEPENDENT OF ALL
OTHERS EACH TRADE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING AND PARKING ANALYSIS
CIELO BY LEGENDS
UNDERSTANDING ALL SECTIONS OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO
DETERMINE HOW THEY WILL INFLUENCE THEIR PARTICULAR PORTION OF WORK. THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING PROPER PROVIDED PARKING:
COORDINATION AND EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION BETWEEN THE TRADES AS TO
HOW EACH RELATES TO AND IS INFLUENCED BY THE OTHERS.
C. THE INTENT OF THE WORKING DRAWINGS IS TO INDICATE CRITICAL DIMENSIONS TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES : 79 (4 ADA) PROVIDED
POSITION AND KIND OF CONSTRUCTION AND THE SPECIFICATIONS INDICATES SPACES
QUALITIES AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY WORK ON THE WORKING
DRAWINGS NOT MENTIONED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OR ANY WORK DESCRIBED IN
THE SPECIFICATIONS OR ANY WORK DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS AND NOT LEGAL DESCRIPTION
DETAILED IN THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS IF THEY WERE FULLY
DETAILED OR SPECIFIED SHALL BE THE SAME AS SIMILAR PARTS THAT OCCUR
BETWEEN DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS THE MOST EXPENSIVE MATERIALS OR
METHODS SHALL PREVAIL. A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION
D. CRITICAL DIMENSIONS - I.E. DIMENSION REQUIRED BY CODE OR REGULATION - SHALL 15, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA
BE DENOTED AS "CLEAR". "CLEAR" DENOTES DIMENSIONS REQUIRED BETWEEN
AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COVER SHEET
FINISHED WALLS, COMPONENTS, ETC. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS WELL BE FROM FACE
OF STUD TO FACE OF STUD, CENTER LINE OR OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD TO OUTSIDE COUNTY, ARIZONA.
FACE OF STUD. SHOULD ANY QUESTION ARISE CONCERNING THE OVERALL
DIMENSIONS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL THE ARCHITECT/OWNER
IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION OR PROCEED AT HIS/HER OWN RISK. DUE TO BASIS OF BEARING
REPRODUCTION PROCESSES UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD THE DRAWINGS
BE SCALED.
THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
ACCOMPLISHING THE WORK Project number 22111
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP
A. DUE TO THE NATURE OF THIS WORK THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER Date 02/12/25
THAT WHEN ACCOMPLISHING A DETAILED PORTION OF THE WORK IF ANOTHER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
PORTION IS DAMAGED OR OTHERWISE AFFECTED, OR IF WORK OR EXISTING Drawn by HD
FACILITIES ADJACENT TO THE SITE IS DAMAGED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR Checked by KHB
AND OR CORRECT THE AFFECTED PORTION AND RETURN IT TO ITS ORIGINAL OR BEARING =S89° 18' 42"E
BETTER CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
B. IMPORTANT NOTE: THE ABOVE IS IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND
LOCAL BUILDING CODES, REGULATIONS AND LAWS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. 0000
Scale As indicated
© 2025 copyright KHB Architecture Studios, PLLC

VACANT ZONING: RESIDENTIAL
RU-43 ZONING: RU-43
S 89°45' 57" 6' HIGH IRON
432.3 E FENCE
0'
4' HIGH MESH
FENCE
WASH TO REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
25'-0" REMAIN
UNDISTURBED
TO
ARCHITECTURE | PLANNING | DESIGN
RETENTION
AREA
RESIDENTIAL ZONING: LEGAL DESCRIPTION
RU-43
218.57'
CMU SCREEN 4' HIGH MESH A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST
WALLS UNDISTURBED FENCE QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP
AREA
1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA
AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
WALL
ARIZONA
ROCK
7 8'-0" 7 7 8'-0"
R 13'-4"
3'-0" 5 4 3
7
28 2
18'-0" 83'-9" 18'-0"
7
27 41'-6" 1
6'-0" CMU WALL
36'-2" 7
0
26
ROCK WALL
6
9 1215
18'-0" 25 24'-0" 36'-0" 23'-9" 18'-0"
6
8'-0" 8'-0" R 4'-0" R 4'-0" 8 CMU
6 SCREEN
4 6 WALLS
24 8 0 108'-0" 7
66
18'-0" 18'-0"
23
47 59
65
22 46 58
6
1225
21 45 57 4
63
20 4 5 85339
4 6
62
APN: 300-09-014A FLAG POLE
19 4 5
WALL
108'-0" 108'-0" 3 5 61 AZ
18 ROCK RD
42 54 33"
R
3'-6"
02'
17 41 53 420.01' LEGENDS
00°
R 34'-6" VILLAGE,
S E
CARVER
1 4 5
WALL
6 0 2
PERGOLA
15 39 51 ROCK PAVE BY
HIGH
B.W.F RS W
4' 14 38 50
R 35'-0" LAVEEN
CIELO
R ROCK MAZE 3801
13 37 49 55'-0"
IRON
4'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" R
R 4'-0" HIGH
FENCE
4'
12
STEP
RESIDENTIAL ZONING:
RU-43 S
79 TOTAL VACANT ZONING:
11 PARKING (4 ADA) WALL R1-18
20'-0" WIDE FIRELANE EXISTING
GATHERING
10 ROCK SPACE
26"
03' R
244.89' 9 4'-0"
00°
FOR: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
N W R 35'-0"
8 3 R 55'-0" 55'-0" WALKWAY ADA REV # DATE
6 35'-0" R R STEP
6'-0" CMU 7 3 12'-0" S
WALL 108'-2" 5
TREE
6 34 WELL 20'-0"
1220
5 33
RETAINING WALL FOR PATIO
TURN AROUND 4 3 WALL
FIRELANE
2
18'-0" 24'-0" 18'-0" ROCK WALL
WIDE
40'-0 1/2" 3 31 ADA
WALKWAY ADA
28'-6" ROCK 20'-0" WALKWAY BUILDING
9'-0" TYP. 2 30 FF=1230.12'
BUILDING PEAK=1247.92' CIELO BY LEGENDS
FF=1230.40'
PEAK=1255.18'
1 29
R 3'-0" TRE
1220 20'-0" E R 55'-0"
R R
3'-0" WEL 35'-0"
1/2" L
38'-6"
TURN AROUND 19'-3 24'-0"
1/2" FLAGPOLE
9'-10
SITE PLAN
ENTRY
GATE 20'-0" WIDE FIRELANE
25'-0"
SEPTIC
TANK
Project number 22111
Date 02/12/25
5' HIGH IRON N 89°45' 57" Drawn by HD
FENCE W 432.23' Checked by KHB
VACANT ZONING: R1-18
H A000
T SITE PLAN
R
O N 1/16" = 1'-0" Scale As indicated
© 2025 copyright KHB Architecture Studios, PLLC

VACANT VACANT ZONING: RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
ZONING: RU-43 RU-43 ZONING: ZONING: RU-43 RU-43
S S 89°45' 89°45' 57" 57" E 6' HIGH IRON FENCE
6' HIGH IRON
432.3 432.30' E
FENCE
4' 4' HIGH HIGH MESH MESH FENCE 0'
FENCE
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
WASH WASH TO TO REMAIN REMAIN
25'-0" REMAIN REMAIN UNDISTURBED UNDISTURBED
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 UNDISTURBED UNDISTURBED 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ARCHITECTURE | PLANNING | DESIGN
TO PRE-CURFEW PHOTOMETRICS (BEFORE 10:00 PM)
TO
ALL LIGHTING WILL BE SHUT OFF AT 10:00 PM
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LIGHTING ZONE 3
RETENTION RETENTION
AREA AREA POST-CURFEW PHOTOMETRICS
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (AFTER 10:00 PM)
218.57' ALL LIGHTING WILL BE SHUT OFF AT 10:00 PM THEREFORE ALL SITE PHOTOMETRIC
218.57'
CMU SCREEN WALLS VALUES POST-CURFEW WILL EQUAL 0.0.
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CMU SCREEN 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 UNDISTURBED UNDISTURBED 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4' HIGH MESH FENCE
WALLS
AREA AREA LIGHTING ZONE 3
OPERATING HOURS.
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 4.3 SL-1 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WALL WALL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MH: 8 ROCK HIGH AMBIENT LIGHT AREAS, FOUND IN ZONING DISTRICTS: CB-2, CI-1, CI-2, CI-B, AC-1,
ROCK
AC-2, AC-3, C-2, C-3, I-1, I-2, I-3. OUTDOOR LIGHTING IN THIS LIGHTING ZONE SHALL NOT
75 7 8'-0" 74 7 73 7 8'-0" EXCEED 100 PERCENT OF THE MAXIMUM LIGHTING POWER DENSITY (LPD) LIMITS
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 R R 3'-0" 3'-0" 13'-4" 0.1 5 0.1 0.3 4 5.2 3.3 3 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ESTABLISHED IN THE CURRENTLY ADOPTED VERSION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY
CONSERVATION CODE (IECC), OR A LUMEN DENSITY (LD) OF 19 LUMENS PER SQUARE
72 7
FOOT, WHICHEVER IS LESS.NOTE: IN THE EVENT THAT A NEW LIGHTING ZONE 3 SITE, OR
18'-0" 28 28 83'-9" 2 18'-0" AN EXISTING LIGHTING ZONE 3 SITE THAT IS UNDERGOING A RENOVATION (AS PER
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
71 PCDSC 2.195.010(B)), IS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN 150 FEET OF AN EXISTING LIGHTING
7 ZONE 1 SITE, THEN THE LIGHTING ZONE 3 SITE SHALL BE CONSIDERED A LIGHTING ZONE
6'-0" 6'-0" CMU CMU WALL WALL 27 27 41'-6" 1 2 SITE FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFORMANCE TO THIS CHAPTER.
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 36'-2" 0.7 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.3 70 7 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LIGHTING ZONE .3:
26 26 0
W-1 ROCK ROCK WALL WALL
69 6 A. POLE- OR WALL-MOUNTED LUMINAIRES OF LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 3,500 INITIAL
0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 5.2 1.9 6.0 2.3 0.7 5.3 1.5 0.5 0.3 9 7.4 0.0 MH: 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1215 1215 0.0 LUMENS MAY BE SEMI-CUTOFF, CUTOFF, OR FULL-CUTOFF. ALL OTHER POLE OR
18'-0" 25 25 24'-0" 36'-0" 23'-9" 18'-0" WALL-MOUNTED LUMINAIRES SHALL BE FULL-CUTOFF. BOLLARDS SHALL BE FULL-
68 CUTOFF, OR LOUVERED WITH COATED LAMPS, OR OF A TYPE WHERE THE LAMP IS
8'-0" 8'-0" R R 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 6 8 CMU SCREEN SHIELDED AND NOT DIRECTLY VISIBLE.
0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 SL-1 5.3 1.5 2.4 2.4 SL-1 0.8 SL-1 R R 6.2 1.5 0.6 0.5 3.2 0.1 CMU WALLS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
48 60 67 6 SCREEN B. WALL-MOUNTED fiXTURES OF GREATER THAN 6,500 INITIAL LUMENS SHALL
MH: 8 24 4 MH: 8 MH: 8 6 108'-0" 7 WALLS POSSESS A BOTTOM-DIFFUSING LENS OR AN INTERNAL HOUSE-SIDE SHIELD TO
24 8 0
66 66 THE SATISFACTION OF PLANNING STAFF. UPLIGHTING fiXTURES SHALL NOT
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 18'-0" 0.9 18'-0" 1.9 0.7 0.3 0.5 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EXCEED 1,200 INITIAL LUMENS EACH.
23 23
47 47 59 59
C. LUMINAIRES LOCATED AT OR WITHIN 30 FEET OF A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE
65 65
SHALL NOT EXCEED EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT. LUMINAIRES LOCATED GREATER THAN
0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.0 22 0.2 0.5 46 0.7 2.9 7.7 58 1.3 0.4 0.4 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
22 46 58 30 FEET AND LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 150 FEET FROM A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
64 LINE, AND NOT BLOCKED FROM DIRECT VIEW BY A STRUCTURE, SHALL NOT
SL-1 SL-1 6 1225 1225 EXCEED 15 FEET IN HEIGHT. ALL OTHERS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30 FEET IN HEIGHT.
21 21 45 45 57 57 4 POLE COLOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY PLANNING STAFF. 85339
0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 1.2 0.3 1.1 7.4 3.8 MH: MH: 8 8 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.3 13.9 0.0 W-1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
63 63
MH: 5 D. THE MAXIMUM INITIAL VERTICAL ILLUMINANCE AT ANY CALCULATION POINT SHALL
20 20 44 4 56 5 NOT EXCEED 1.50 FOOTCANDLES DURING NORMAL BUSINESS EVENING HOURS,
0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 W-1 1.0 0.2 0.6 2.3 4 1.1 0.4 6 0.9 1.3 0.4 62 62 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AND 0.80 FOOTCANDLES AFTER THE FACILITY ENTERS SECURITY-LIGHTING-ONLY AZ
19 APN: APN: 300-09-014A 300-09-014A FLAG FLAG POLE POLE OPERATING MODE. RD
MH: 5 19 43 4 55 5
WALL WALL
108'-0" 108'-0" 3 5 61 61 E. UPLIGHTING TO BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 800 INITIAL LUMENS. TURN OFF TO BE
0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 1.2 18 18 0.2 0.2 42 0.4 0.4 0.9 54 2.8 9.5 0.8 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ROCK ROCK 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AT 10:00 P.M. OR ONE HOUR AFTER CLOSE OF BUSINESS. LEGENDS
42 54
R R E 33" VILLAGE,
3'-6" 3'-6" 33" LIGHTING NOTES CARVER
SL-1 02'
17 17 41 41 53 53 420.01' 420.01' 02'
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.3 1.5 4.5 1.8 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00° 1. DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING LIGHTING
MH: 8 R R 34'-6" 34'-6" 00° S S E FIXTURE LOCATIONS. COORDINATE WITH DRAWINGS OF OTHER TRADES TO FIT
16 1 40 4 52 5 ACTUAL SPACE CONDITIONS. BY
6 0 2 WALL WALL 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CAREFULLY LAYING OUT ALL WORK TO W
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.4 5.7 3.3 5.9 1.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CONFORM TO NEC CLEARANCES, ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL,
B.W.F 15 SL-1 SL-1 ROCK PERGOLA PERGOLA
15 39 39 51 51 ROCK PAVERS AND SITE CONDITIONS TO AVOID OBSTRUCTIONS AND ALLOW THE PROPER LAVEEN
HIGH MH: MH: 8 8 PAVE INSTALLATION OF EACH ITEM. CIELO
HIGH B.W.F RS 3801
3. ALL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC 2017 AND LOCAL
4' 4' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.6 14 14 1.1 1.7 38 5.6 0.8 1.0 50 1.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
38 50 R R CODES HAVING JURISDICTION.
35'-0" 35'-0"
13 R R ROCK ROCK MAZE MAZE FENCE
13 37 37 49 49 55'-0" 55'-0"
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 9.2 2.0 0.9 1.1 0.4 4.3 5.0 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IRON
4'-0" 4'-0" R R IRON LIGHT FIXTURES
R R 8'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0"
SL-1 SL-1 SL-1 HIGH HIGH FENCE
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 MH: 1.2 8 0.9 0.6 5.5 MH: 8 3.0 2.1 MH: 8 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.6 2.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 4' 4' MANUFACTURER MOUNTING HT WATTS LUMENS CCT LLF QTY
12 12
STEPS STEP
SL-1 SL-1: 8'-0" 24.7 2693 3000K 1.0 19
S
11 79 79 TOTAL TOTAL
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 11 0.2 PARKING PARKING 0.4 (4 (4 ADA) ADA) 2.8 2.4 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.9 19.3 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 ZONING: R1-18
WALL WALL W-3
20'-0" 20'-0" WIDE WIDE FIRELANE FIRELANE EXISTING EXISTING W-1 SL-1: 5'-0" 93.8 7058 3000K 1.0 7
10 ROCK MH: 5 GATHERING GATHERING
10 ROCK SPACE
W 26" 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.3 0.3 0.6 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.4 11.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 SPACE 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.1 FOR: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
26" W-2 SL-1: 8'-0" 11 489 3000K 1.0 8
03' 03' 244.89' 244.89' 9 9 R R 4'-0" 4'-0" REV # DATE
00° SL-1
00° ADA
N N W 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 1.4 0.8 3.7 6.2 MH: 0.3 8 0.2 0.3 1.5 2.5 0.6 0.1 0.9 3.9 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 R R 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.7 4.5 2.4 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.1
8 36 R R 35'-0" 35'-0" W-3 SL-1: 5'-0" 93.8 7058 3000K 1.0 2
8 3 55'-0" 55'-0" R 55'-0" 55'-0" WALKWAY ADA
6 35'-0" 35'-0" R R R WALKWAY STEPS STEP
W-1 0.0 0.0 S 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 25.6 1.5 7 7 0.5 1.8 35 1.9 3 0.2 0.1 0.3 2.3 7.0 0.5 0.3 4.8 12'-0" 12'-0" 3.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.2 6.5 4.6 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LUMEN DENSITY CALC
MH: 5 108'-2" 5 0.125 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TREE WELL 36.1 2.7 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.25 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SL-1 TREE 83.2 3.8 2.3 W-3 1.5 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL LUMENS LUMEN DENSITY
6 6 34 34 WELL 20'-0" 141.7 9.7 3.9 1.8 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 1.6 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 MH: 0.3 8 1.0 8.5 3.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.3 11.5 3.4 4.1 MH: 1.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 12 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BEFORE AFTER BEFORE AFTER
W-1 W-1 13.0 6.4 2.1 1.5 1.4 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PROJECT AREA 10:00 PM 10:00 PM 10:00 PM 10:00 PM
5 5 33 33 SL-1 1220 1220 MH: 8 MH: 13.6 1.3 0.5 0.3 5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7.2 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 696,960 SF
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.9 3.7 6.6 MH: 0.3 8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.2 6.3 FIRELANE 1.1 0.2 0.4 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 PATIO PATIO 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 3.7 1.7 1.6 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (16 ACRES) 4.61 0 4.61 LUMENS/ SQ FT 0 LUMENS/SQ FT
WALL 0.0 0.0 W-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W-2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 4 32 3 WALL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FIRELANE W-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 0.0 0.0 MH: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MH: 0.0 0.0 W-2 8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
18'-0" 24'-0" 18'-0" ROCK ROCK WALL WIDE MH: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MAIN PARKING AREA
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.6 4.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.8 WALL 2.5 WIDE 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MH: 0.7 8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 ADA 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LIGHTING LEGEND
3 31 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ILLUMINANCE (Fc) CIELO BY LEGENDS
3 31 SL-1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ADA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ROCK ROCK 20'-0" 20'-0" 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WALKWAY WALKWAY WALKWAY ADA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BUILDING 0.0 BUILDING 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ADA WALKWAY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVERAGE =1.84
9'-0" TYP. 2 2 30 30 MH: 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FF=1230.12' 0.0 FF=1230.12' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 POLE MOUNTED LIGHTING
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 3.1 1.5 1.0 3.1 6.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BUILDING BUILDING 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEAK=1247.92' 0.0 0.0 PEAK=1247.92' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MAXIMUM = 18.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FF=1230.40' 0.0 FF=1230.40' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MINIMUM = 0.1 SL-1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEAK=1255.18' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CANDELA FILE 'F001316FCW33624K.IES'
1 29 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEAK=1255.18' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 3'-0" 3'-0" 29 TREE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVG/ MIN RATIO = 18.40
R R TRE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 R 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 7.4 2.0 0.8 1.0 R 0.9 0.1 0.1 1220 1220 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 20'-0" 0.3 0.1 0.1 WELL E 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 R 0.2 55'-0" 55'-0" 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MAX/MIN RATIO = 182.00
6'-0" CMU WALL R 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 R R 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6'-0" CMU SL-1 3'-0" 3'-0" WEL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35'-0" 35'-0" 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
WALL 1/2" L 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
40'-0 1/2" 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OVERALL SITE
MH: 8 19'-3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NEW WALL MOUNTED LIGHTING
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.5 24'-0" 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 4.4 SL-1 7.4 1.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ILLUMINANCE (Fc)
W-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W-2 15.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W-1 CANDELA FILE 'F001316FCW33624K.IES'
MH: 8 W-2 W-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVERAGE = 0.57 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
1/2" FLAGPOLE FLAGPOLE MH: 8 MH: 8 W-1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MAXIMUM = 27.0
SL-1 MH: 8 MH: 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 9'-10 0.4 1.5 9.4 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.5 2.2 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.3 0.8 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 19.6 MH: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MINIMUM = 0.0 EXISTING WALL MOUNTED LIGHTING
MH: 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AVG/ MIN RATIO = N/A CANDELA FILE 'F001316FCW33624K.IES'
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MAX/MIN RATIO = N/A W-2
0.0 0.0 ENTRY ENTRY 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.25 1.0 3.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
GATE 20'-0" 20'-0" WIDE WIDE FIRELANE FIRELANE Project number 22111
GATE 0.5 SEPTIC SEPTIC TANK 25'-0" PROPERTY LINE Date 02/12/25
NEW WALL MOUNTED EMERGENCY
0.125 TANK ILLUMINANCE (Fc) EXTERIOR LIGHTING Drawn by KHB
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W-3
CANDELA FILE 'F001316FCW33624K.IES' Checked by KHB
AVERAGE = 0.01
MAXIMUM = 0.2
Parking Area 5' 5' HIGH HIGH IRON IRON FENCE N N 89°45' 89°45' 57" 57" W P-1
H 432.23' 432.23' MINIMUM = 0.0
T PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FENCE W
R
O VACANT ZONING: R1-18 AVG/ MIN RATIO = N/A Scale As indicated
N 1/16" = 1'-0" MAX/MIN RATIO = N/A
© 2025 copyright KHB Architecture Studios, PLLC

CIELO BY LEGENDS
Special Use Permit NARRATIVE REPORT
3801 W. CARVER RD
LAVEEN VILLAGE, AZ 85339
Case #B202204237
Date:02/12/2025
SITE LOCATION
Report by
KHB Architecture Studios, PLLC
3867 E. Palmer Street
Gilbert, AZ 85298

Contents
Purpose of Request ................................................................................................................... 1
Description of Proposal.............................................................................................................. 1
Delivery entrances: .................................................................................................................... 2
Environmental/neighborhood impact: ........................................................................................ 2
Hours of operation/employees: .................................................................................................. 2
Relationship to Surrounding Properties ..................................................................................... 3
Location and Accessibility .......................................................................................................... 3
Circulation System ..................................................................................................................... 4
Development Schedule.............................................................................................................. 4
Community Facilities and Services ............................................................................................ 5
Public Utilities and Services ....................................................................................................... 5

Cielo by Legends – Special Use Permit – case #B202204237
Purpose of Request
The property at 3801 W. Carver Rd. is currently zoned as Rural-43. The owner is requesting a Special Use Permit
to allow the use of the property for an outdoor event and hospitality business within this zoning designation.
The Rural-43 zoning district typically permits agricultural and residential uses. However, the owner believes that
the property's unique characteristics, location, and natural beauty make it suitable for hosting outdoor events and
providing hospitality services. By obtaining a Special Use Permit, the owner seeks to utilize the property in a
manner that deviates from the typical uses allowed under the Rural-43 zoning.
Description of Proposal
Overall, the owner's proposal encompasses a special use permit request to establish an outdoor event and
hospitality business on the property. The plan includes the construction of a new parking lot with permeable
paving, the utilization of the existing house for accommodation and event hosting, designated landscape areas for
outdoor activities, and an indoor event space within the retrofitted building.
Section 1 - Parking Lot:
Upon reaching the end of the road and passing through the gated entrance, you will find the proposed parking lot
area situated to the north of the property. This area will feature water retention elements and tall fencing to
effectively screen the parking lot from neighboring properties. The owner intends to enhance the parking lot with
the addition of new trees and vegetation, providing shade and contributing to the overall aesthetics of the venue.
In regard to the parking lot surface, the owner is seeking a deviation from County code article 1102.7.1. The
deviation is specifically to utilize an alternative permeable surfacing material such as crushed gravel or
decomposed granite, which will be treated with an anti-dust solution. This choice of permeable surface material is
aimed at maintaining the property's water handling capabilities, considering its proximity to mountain runoff. In
addition, it aligns with the owner's commitment to minimizing the heat island effect by avoiding the use of dark
asphalt paving.
Section 2 - House:
Continuing past the parking lot area, you will come across an existing small home on the property. The house
features three bedrooms with a total of six beds and two and a half bathrooms. It includes a kitchen and a
spacious open-plan living area, capable of accommodating up to eight overnight guests. This space is intended to
serve as accommodation for guests as part of wedding packages or other types of stays. The open-plan layout
also lends itself well to hosting conferences and team-building retreats.
Adjacent to the house, there are proposed ADA parking spaces to ensure accessibility. Additionally, there is an
existing storage garage on the property that will be utilized for storage purposes and sorting incoming deliveries.
A hidden location for a dumpster is also planned to responsibly manage waste on the premises.
Section 3 - Landscape Area:
The remaining portion of the property is designed with various outdoor activity areas in mind. This includes small,
designated spaces for different purposes, existing terraced areas, and a seating area. There is also a natural
wash that runs through the property, which will be preserved in its natural state. Furthermore, an outdoor fireplace
will be available for gatherings and relaxation.
Section 4 - Indoor Event Space:
On the property, there is a 3500 square foot building that was originally a garage but has been retrofitted into an
indoor event space. This space is equipped with restrooms, a bar, storage facilities, a bridal room, and a grand
staircase that provides an elegant setting for photography and other purposes.
KHB Architecture Studios, PLLC
3867 E. Palmer Street
Tel.480-687-3606 Gilbert, AZ 85298 KHBarchstudios.com

Cielo by Legends – Special Use Permit – case #B202204237
Delivery entrances:
There will be one delivery entrance. The truck will drive straight onto the property to the storage
garage area and can then forward pull around the front of the house and back out the way It came In.
Environmental/neighborhood impact:
The proposed outdoor event and hospitality business on the property aims to have minimal environmental impact
and maintain a harmonious relationship with the neighborhood. The property's existing features, such as its
proximity to South Mountain and the East Laveen trail, provide a beautiful natural backdrop for outdoor activities.
Regarding overnight guests, the environmental impact is expected to be low as the existing house will be utilized
without significant alterations. The primary addition to the property will be the construction of a parking lot. To
mitigate environmental concerns, the owner is requesting a deviation to implement a permeable and anti-dust
paving solution, utilizing crushed gravel or decomposed granite. This choice of paving material aligns with
sustainable practices by promoting water permeability and reducing the heat island effect associated with
traditional asphalt surfaces.
The property is bordered on two sides by a large single privately owned lot that is currently vacant. There are two
large lot residences to the north and west of the property. The owner intends to provide screening of the parking
lot area and plant shade trees to mitigate light pollution and control sound. By utilizing natural screening elements
and following noise ordinances, the owner aims to address any concerns related to noise from the venue.
Additionally, the property's elevated position, approximately 10'-0" to 20'-0" above the surrounding properties, can
help reduce sound propagation. Measures such as creating speaker zones and implementing sound reduction
techniques will further mitigate any potential noise issues.
The intention behind the proposal is to maintain a connection to the preserve and honor the rural roots of Laveen
by preserving open spaces and focusing the business on outdoor activities as much as possible. By embracing
the natural surroundings and implementing sound and light control measures, the owner seeks to ensure that the
venue remains in harmony with its environment and minimizes any negative impacts on the neighborhood.
Hours of operation/employees:
The proposed wedding venue will operate within specific hours and employ a varying number of staff members
based on the event. The owner, who possesses experience in the outdoor event business, has developed a
business plan that includes measures to ensure compliance with codes and noise ordinances.
The venue's events will be limited in terms of the number of attendees to manage the impact on the property and
the surrounding area. Additionally, all events will conclude by 10 PM, in accordance with local regulations
governing noise and event duration.
As a predominantly weekend business, the venue will primarily operate on weekends to accommodate wedding
ceremonies and related events. The exact hours of operation may vary depending on specific event schedules
and requirements.
The number of employees will vary based on the size and nature of each event. On average, there will be
approximately 5-6 staff members present to assist and manage guests, ensuring a smooth and enjoyable
experience for everyone involved.
During the typical high season in Arizona, which occurs from fall through spring, the venue's house will be
available for private overnight rentals. This allows guests to extend their stay and enjoy the amenities and
surroundings of the property. Guests renting the house are also expected to adhere to all noise ordinances in
order to maintain a peaceful environment for both the venue and the surrounding neighborhood.
KHB Architecture Studios, PLLC
3867 E. Palmer Street
Tel.480-687-3606 Gilbert, AZ 85298 KHBarchstudios.com

Cielo by Legends – Special Use Permit – case #B202204237
By implementing these measures, the owner aims to operate the wedding venue in a responsible manner,
ensuring compliance with regulations, and creating a positive experience for guests while considering the impact
on the local community.
Relationship to Surrounding Properties
The property is situated in the Laveen community, with W. Carver Rd. in close proximity of South
Mountain Park and Preserve. The entrance to the property is located at the end of S. 38th Avenue, right
off the main road.
The majority of the property borders the park, allowing for a close connection to the natural
surroundings and providing a beautiful backdrop for outdoor activities. The park's presence contributes
to the property's appeal as an outdoor event and hospitality venue.
The property also has two residential neighbors with large lots. These neighboring properties are
situated adjacent to the venue, likely providing a sense of privacy and separation.
To maintain a positive relationship with the surrounding properties, the owner plans to implement
measures to minimize any potential negative impacts. This includes screening the parking lot area,
planting trees for shade and visual barriers, and implementing sound control measures to mitigate
noise concerns. By incorporating these elements, the owner aims to ensure that the venue operates in
harmony with the neighborhood and preserves the serene and rural character of Laveen.
Overall, the property's location, with its proximity to South Mountain Park and Preserve and residential
neighbors on large lots, offers a unique setting for the proposed outdoor event and hospitality business.
The owner's commitment to minimizing impacts and maintaining a positive relationship with the
community underscores their intention to be a responsible and considerate neighbor.
Location and Accessibility
The property's location at the end of S 38th Avenue provides a sense of separation from the rest of the
surrounding neighborhood, contributing to its privacy and uniqueness as an event venue. To ensure smooth traffic
flow and accessibility, a simplified parking lot will be installed on the property, featuring a single entry and exit
point. This design helps to facilitate the movement of vehicles in and out of the venue, reducing congestion and
potential disruptions to the neighborhood.
KHB Architecture Studios, PLLC
3867 E. Palmer Street
Tel.480-687-3606 Gilbert, AZ 85298 KHBarchstudios.com

Cielo by Legends – Special Use Permit – case #B202204237
In terms of accessibility, the parking lot will include designated spaces to accommodate individuals with
disabilities. This will consist of a single van accessible space and four other ADA parking spaces located near the
house. Pathways will allow for accessible travel on the site to all area and buildings. Additionally, a drop-off zone
will be available for guests attending events, providing convenient access for those who may require assistance.
To facilitate deliveries and waste management, the property will have drive-through access for delivery trucks,
ensuring efficient and convenient service. A designated area for waste management, such as a dumpster access
point, will also be provided to maintain cleanliness and proper waste disposal practices.
The overall design and accessibility features of the property aim to enhance the visitor experience, minimize
traffic disruptions, and ensure efficient operations while respecting the needs and convenience of both guests and
the surrounding neighborhood.
Circulation System
The circulation system of the property is designed to provide convenient access and a seamless flow for guests
and vehicles. The arrival to the property begins at the entry gate, which leads to the parking lot. From the parking
lot, an outdoor stairway is provided to connect the parking area to the level of the house and the uppermost
landscape area. This allows guests to easily access the event spaces and provides an opportunity for a scenic
walk up towards the Preserve, offering a beautiful view and setting as they prepare to attend the event.
In addition to the stairway, a driveway is present on the property. The driveway runs past the entry to the parking
lot and continues to wrap around the house, passing by the storage garage. It then proceeds around the front of
the house, ultimately leading back out to S 38th Avenue. This driveway configuration ensures a smooth flow of
vehicles and allows for convenient access to different areas of the property. Since the roadway access to the
property dead-ends at the entry gate, there is a small turn around in front of the gate area.
The design of the circulation system aims to provide efficient and well-connected pathways for both guests and
vehicles, ensuring ease of movement and creating a pleasant and accessible experience for everyone attending
events at the venue. In order to address concerns for the health, safety, and continued accessibility, the owner
will have a neighborhood meeting to discuss S. 38th Street as it is not a county roadway and is maintained
through local easements.
Development Schedule
Once the application for the Special Use Permit is submitted to Maricopa County, the owner plans to notify
surrounding property owners of the intent as outlined in the Citizen Participation Plan. This step demonstrates the
owner's commitment to engaging with the local community and keeping them informed about the proposed
development.
The application process for the Special Use Permit is expected to take approximately 3 months. This duration can
vary depending on factors such as the complexity of the application and any potential reviews or revisions
required by the county.
Given that there is not much existing infrastructure on the property, the development process can proceed
relatively quickly. The parking lot can be carved out efficiently, allowing for events to start taking place once the
necessary approvals and permits are obtained.
It's important to note that specific timelines and project schedules can be subject to various factors, including
regulatory processes, weather conditions, and unforeseen circumstances. Therefore, it's always advisable to
consult with the relevant authorities and professionals involved in the project to ensure accurate and up-to-date
information regarding the development schedule.
KHB Architecture Studios, PLLC
3867 E. Palmer Street
Tel.480-687-3606 Gilbert, AZ 85298 KHBarchstudios.com

Cielo by Legends – Special Use Permit – case #B202204237
Community Facilities and Services
The Laveen community offers a range of facilities and services to cater to the needs of its residents and visitors.
Here are some key features and amenities in the area:
• Natural Attractions: The property benefits from its proximity to various natural attractions, including South
Mountain Park and Preserve. This expansive park offers opportunities for hiking, biking, and enjoying the
scenic beauty of the surrounding landscape. Nearby trails such as the San Juan Lookout, National Trail,
Dead Man's Pass, Curtis Saddle Trailhead, and East Laveen Trail provide additional outdoor recreational
options.
• Accessibility: The property's location near the South Mountain Loop highway ensures easy access to and
from the site. This highway provides a convenient transportation route for residents and visitors,
connecting them to other areas of Phoenix and beyond.
• Entertainment and Casinos: The property's proximity to the Gila River Indian Community offers access to
casinos and other entertainment options. Visitors can enjoy gaming, live shows, dining, and various
entertainment activities in the vicinity.
• Education: The community is served by the Laveen Elementary School District and the Roosevelt
Elementary School District for elementary and middle school students. The Phoenix Union High School
District caters to the educational needs of high school students in the area, ensuring access to quality
education at different levels.
• Healthcare: There is a hospital serving the Laveen community, providing essential healthcare services to
residents. This ensures access to medical care and emergency services within a reasonable distance.
• Emergency Services: The City of Phoenix provides fire support for the area, ensuring prompt response to
fire emergencies. Additionally, the Phoenix Police have a precinct located in the vicinity, ensuring law
enforcement services and maintaining community safety.
These facilities and services contribute to the overall livability and convenience of the Laveen community,
supporting the residents' needs and providing a range of recreational, educational, healthcare, and safety
resources.
Public Utilities and Services
The property benefits from public utility services provided by the City of Phoenix and Salt River Project (SRP).
Here are the details regarding utilities and services:
1. Water: The property is served by the city of Phoenix water district, ensuring a reliable and consistent
water supply for the venue and its operations.
2. Electricity: The electric service is provided by SRP, a utility company that supplies power to the region.
This ensures access to electricity for the property's infrastructure and facilities.
3. Trash Services: Waste management services are provided by Waste Management, a reputable waste
disposal and recycling company. The property will have a waste management dumpster, which will be
positioned behind an enclosure to screen it from view.
4. Stormwater Management: To control stormwater runoff and keep as much water as possible on the
property, the owner plans to install retention basins. These basins help to manage and mitigate the
impact of rainfall and prevent excessive runoff, contributing to better water management practices.
5. Septic System: The property currently has an existing septic system in place, and it is intended to remain
operational. The septic system ensures the proper treatment and disposal of wastewater generated on
the property.
By utilizing these public utilities and services, the property can operate effectively and responsibly while
maintaining compliance with regulations and ensuring the well-being of the surrounding environment and
community.
KHB Architecture Studios, PLLC
3867 E. Palmer Street
Tel.480-687-3606 Gilbert, AZ 85298 KHBarchstudios.com

Planning & Development
Engineering Plan Review
Date: 08/22/2024
Kevin Amoroso, P.E.
Planning & Development Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning &
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 Development
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Phone: 602-372-4114
Fax: (602) 506-8762 Attn: Andrew Lorentzen, Planner, Planning & Development Services
www.maricopa.gov/planning
Email address:
Kevin.Amoroso@maricopa.gov cc: Bob Fedorka, PE, Engineering Manager, Planning & Development
Doug Jones, PE, CFM, Engineering Supervisor, Planning &
Development
From: Kevin Amoroso, PE, Plans Examiner Engineer, Planning &
Development
Subject: SU240005 – Event venue and bed and breakfast.
APN(s): 300-09-014A
Engineering Review has reviewed the first plan and report routed for review on
07/10/2024, for the subject application and has no objections, subject to the following
stipulations:
DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW
No objections subject to the following stipulations.
1. For building permit issuance, the retention basin must provide 1-foot of freeboard. If a berm is
used to provide freeboard, it must be a minimum of 8-feet wide and have a defined weir
outfall.
Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual
design only. All development and engineering design shall be in
conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for
Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
All plans and reports should be developed and formatted to document
that the project is designed to meet all County regulations, ordinances
and design standards.
It is incumbent upon the engineer to demonstrate compliance with all
regulatory requirements and County design standards.

Page 2 of 3
DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW REFERENCES:
The Drainage Regulations are listed in Section 1205 of the MCZO:
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/272
Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards Manual:
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2369
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/1635/Drainage-Review
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY REFERENCES:
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County:
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/630
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/3847/Flood-Control-District
PND TRANSPORTATION REFERENCES:
Residential Driveway Guidelines
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/362
Roadway Design Manual
http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/24883
Maricopa County Resolution for ROW Permits
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/364
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/156/MCDOT
PND STORMWATER QUALITY (SWPPP) REFERENCES:
Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge Control Regulation
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577
Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 310
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5354
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/3980/Water-Sewage-Stormwater-Waste

Page 3 of 3
Abbreviations Key:
Drainage:
DD = Department Directive (See: http://www.maricopa.gov/1911/Department-
Directives)
MCZO = Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
DPSM = Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards
SSA = State Standard Attachment
DDMV1= Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydrology
DDMV2 = Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydraulics
Flood Control:
FRMC = Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County
PND Transportation:
RDM = MCDOT Roadway Design Manual
RDG = MCDOT Residential Design Guidelines
MSRP = MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
PND Storm Water:
SWMDCR= Maricopa County Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge
Control Regulation
DDMV3= Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Erosion Control
APCR= Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations – Rule 310

Traffic Engineering Review Comment Sheet
Project Name Cielo By Legends (Special Event Business) Discipline Traffic Statement
Location Carver Rd & 38th Ave (3801 W. Carver Road, Laveen, Arizona) Consultant Lokahi, LLC
MCDOT File No. SU240005 Plans Sealed By Marina Stender, P.E.
Reviewer/Phone No. Laxmikanth Narwa, P.E./602.506.8677 Signature
Date
Consultant: Please use the code and respond to each comment in the Consultant Reply Column. This sheet is for our records, please answer every question and sign and date your acknowledgment or the plans will be sent back
to complete the process. Send back the marked‐up plans and a new set of plans along with this sheet. Thank you for your cooperation.
Consultant Code: A=Will Comply B=Deleted C=Consultant to Evaluate
The proposed Cielo by Legends development (Special Event Business) will consist of improvements to the existing outdoor space, construction of new parking lot with the
General Project Summary: site that has two existing residential units. The site is located at 3801 W Carver Rd, Laveen, Arizona and the site parcel number is APN# 300‐09‐014A. The proposed
development is anticipated to generate 220 weekend daily trips, with 2 trips each occurring during the AM and PM weekday peak hours, and 58 trips occurring during the
weekend peak hour. This site is planned to accommodate up to 150 guests. There is one existing access point to the site and a second one is proposed for the site.
Int. Review No. Date Item No. Page No. Review Comment Code Consultant Comment
MCDOT will not accept any new roadways surrounding the site into its' public system. The
LN 1 8/1/2024 1 General existing roadways status (private or public) will remain the same.
MCDOT agrees that the traffic generated by the proposed Cielo by Legends (Special Event
Business) is anticipated to minimal related impacts to the existing roadway network and the
LN 1 8/1/2024 2 General surrounding area.
This Traffic Study is Approved
Page 1 of 1



Dear We are Mr. opposed Lorentzen to case & County Z240005 Supervisors: at 3801 W. Carver Road.
An character systems, event and center of this unmaintained is neighborhood. incompatible dirt Homes roads—none with Rural‑43 in this of area zoning which rely and can on the private support established shared commercial wells, residential event‑venue septic
activity. MCSO, disrupting Loud events the at quiet this rural property environment have already that generated residents value. numerous complaints to
The unpermitted erosion applicant and stormwater construction, has been operating impacts grading, on an and 38th event drainage Avenue. venue alterations illegally During prior since that enforcement 2020 have and contributed has proceedings, performed to
the otherwise. without owner regard denied The applicant for operating zoning, has safety, a repeatedly commercial or neighborhood ignored business, county impacts. yet the directives current and SUP continues request confirms to operate
At resident a recent opposed neighborhood this proposal. meeting hosted by the applicant’s representative, every attending
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Special Use Permit be denied.
Sincerely, Matt and Kathryn Leischer
11926 Laveen, S AZ 38th 85339 Ave
602-405-2598

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: James Montoya <monjamestoya1@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2025 1:20 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Opposition to Special Use Permit Request Case Number SU240005
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing as a community member to formally express my opposition to the Special Use Permit
Request associated with Case Number SU240005.
It is my understanding that this Special Review Application did not pass review in August 2024. Despite
this, a posted notice has been circulated, prompting this formal response.
I oppose this special use request for the following reasons:
 Lack of supporting infrastructure: The proposed use is not supported by adequate infrastructure
to safely or responsibly accommodate increased activity.
 Ingress and egress limitations: Access to the site is extremely limited. Increased traffic would
severely disrupt and compromise immediate residential neighbors’ ability to safely access their
private properties.
 Water supply concerns: The site is serviced by a shared well, which does not have sufficient
capacity to sustain increased or commercial-level use without negatively impacting
surrounding residents.
 Septic system limitations: The existing septic system is not designed or approved for commercial
use and does not accommodate the scale or intensity of the proposed activity.
 Light and noise pollution: The proposal would introduce excessive light and noise, significantly
diminishing the quality of life for nearby residents.
 Wildlife disruption: The proposed use would negatively impact local wildlife and disrupt the
natural balance within the designated zone.
Additionally, my parents, who are elderly, are the immediate neighboring residents located directly north
of the subject property. Since the company/ owner has acquired the property, they have experienced
repeated disturbances due to late-night parties and excessive noise, which have required multiple calls
to law enforcement. These events frequently continue until 2:00 a.m., particularly on Saturday nights.
1

This has had a significant and ongoing impact on the surrounding community. My father is a pastor who
delivers sermons every Sunday morning, and the persistent late-night activity has directly interfered with
my parents ability to rest and maintain their normal household routines. These issues underscore the
incompatibility of the proposed use with a residential area and raise serious concerns about
enforcement, noise control, and long-term neighborhood impacts should the special use be approved.
Given these concerns, I strongly urge Planning and Development to deny this special use request and to
uphold the prior determination from August 2024. The proposal is incompatible with the existing
residential character of the area and poses unnecessary risks to infrastructure capacity, environmental
resources, and community well-being.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Please include this correspondence as part of the official
record for Plan No. SU240005.
Sincerely,
James Montoya
2

Dear Mr. Lorentzen & County Supervisors:
I am opposed to case Z240005 at 3801 W. Carver Road.
An event center is a completely incompatible and irresponsible use for a property zoned as Rural-
43 within an established residential neighborhood with large lot single family residential
bordering all four sides of the property and South Mountain Park within ¼ mile of the property.
If you are not familiar with the area, the site lies between Carver Mountain and South Mountain
in a valley that is primarily part of Maricopa County with small patches of land that is incorporated
as City of Phoenix. Speaking for myself and my neighbors, the attraction of this area is the
relatively quiet rural nature that is also relatively close to downtown Phoenix. Loud parties/events
that have been held at this location have resulted in numerous calls/complaints to MCSO.
In this regard, all infrastructure in the area is designed solely for single family zoning and use.
Many of the roads outside of the main arterial through the area are gravel/dirt roads that receive
very little to no grading or maintenance (38th Avenue included). Water for the homes in the area
is supplied by private wells, often well that are shared between neighbors as there is no municipal
water supply on 38th Avenue. Many of these shared wells have agreements and stipulations on
their use, limiting the water obtained for single family and residential use and excluding
commercial and agricultural/livestock use; I suspect that this issue is pertinent to this
property/applicant and has been overlooked or ignored. Similarly, there is no sanitary sewer
services in the area and all the homes in the area rely upon septic systems. I am very concerned
that if approved or if this applicant is allowed to continue operation of the event venue that the
groundwater will be affected by excessive withdrawal and/or contamination due to an undersized
septic system.
Based upon these concerns, I respectfully request that this application for a Special Use Permit
(SUP) be denied.
Furthermore, you and the county supervisors should be aware that the applicant and property
owner has been illegally operating an event center shortly after the residence and shop was
purchased from the prior owner in October of 2020. Unpermitted work that has been performed
at the site has previously been documented by Planning and Development personnel and has
included modifications to a pre-fabricated garage that may have included removal or alterations
of shear members or bracing, grading and drainage work performed to construct a rudimentary
parking lot that likely raised grades by more than 12-inches and may have altered historic
stormwater runoff by increasing discharge and/or altering discharge locations off the lot (recent
runoff from storm events after these modifications has severely eroded 38th Avenue and increase
sediment deposits in other areas of the neighborhood.
During an initial hearing regarding these complaints and meetings with Planning and
Development that was presided over by a judge/magistrate (forgive me for not knowing the
title/position), the owner claimed that all of the activities were family gatherings and were not
commercial events. Despite the neighbors knowing for certain this was false, and stating such,

the owner was adamant that this was not a commercial operation. Now the truth has been
revealed with this SUP application, this is an expansion of the owner event venue business which
includes other locations in the Phoenix area.
Recently, the owner mailed/delivered flies to the residents in the area for a “neighborhood
meeting” to try and sell the area on their plans. I understand this to be an attempt to meet
requirements that Planning and Development has as part of the SUP process. Approximately 30
to 40 people attended this event. Theo owner was not there; she sent an employee/business
partner in her stead. Make no mistake, every member of the community that attended was
OPPOSED to this event venue and commercial business operating at this site.
Finally, you should understand that the applicant/owner has ignored all directives that resulted
from the aforementioned hearing and has continued to operate at she sees fit. Based upon the
past four to five years of behavior, you and the commissioners should not be surprised when you
are told that they will comply but fail to do so and are ignored; her track record is consistent in
that regard.
Deny Z240005.
Bryan Peltzer, P.E.
3725 W. Fox Rd.
Laveen, Arizona 85339
(602) 680-0878

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Karla Verdugo <kverdugo77@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2026 3:42 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Opposition of Case No. SU240005
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Re: Case No. SU240005 – Special Use Permit for Wedding and Events Venue (Cielo by Legends)
Dear Mr. Andrew Lorentzen,
I am writing to formally oppose the Special Use Permit request for the proposed wedding and events venue
known as Cielo by Legends.
My home, located approximately 230 feet from the proposed venue site (Parcel No. 300-09-072A), would be
directly impacted by the approval of this permit. I built my home in 2021 with the intention of retiring in a
peaceful, secluded rural community where my children and grandchildren could gather and enjoy the quiet
character of the neighborhood. For the most part, that vision has become a reality. However, on days when
events are hosted at the venue, the atmosphere changes dramatically. The single road providing access to the
property becomes congested with event-related traffic, vehicles frequently travel at excessive speeds, and loud
music can often be heard from passing cars as guests arrive and depart. These disturbances are inconsistent
with the rural residential environment that attracted my family to this area and significantly diminish our ability
to peacefully enjoy our property.
My primary concerns are as follows:
1. Traffic and Access Impacts
The proposed venue is accessed by a single easement road that serves neighboring properties. This road was
not designed to accommodate the volume of traffic associated with weddings, parties, and other large events.
Event guests, vendors, service vehicles, and rideshare traffic would create congestion and increase safety
concerns for residents who depend on this route for daily access to their homes.
2. Private Road Maintenance
1

The access road is privately maintained. Increased traffic from commercial events will accelerate wear and tear
on the roadway and create additional maintenance costs and burdens for property owners who were never
intended to subsidize a commercial event operation.
3. Loss of Privacy and Quiet Enjoyment
Wedding and event venues typically generate amplified music, large gatherings, vehicle traffic, outdoor
lighting, and activity extending into evening hours. These impacts would directly affect nearby homeowners
and substantially diminish the privacy and peaceful enjoyment of our properties.
4. Incompatibility with Rural Residential Character
This area is zoned and developed as a rural residential community. I chose to build my custom home in this
location specifically because it offered a quiet, low-density environment removed from commercial activity,
excessive traffic, and event-related noise. Approving a commercial wedding venue in close proximity to
existing homes would fundamentally alter the character of the neighborhood and set a precedent inconsistent
with the area's intended use.
5. Impact on Neighboring Property Owners
The benefits of this proposed venue would accrue to a single property owner, while the burdens of traffic,
noise, congestion, privacy loss, and roadway impacts would be imposed on surrounding residents. I
respectfully submit that these impacts outweigh any benefit provided by the proposed Special Use Permit.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors deny Case No. SU240005.
Thank you for your time, consideration, and service to the residents of Maricopa County. Please confirm
receipt of this letter.
Sincerely,
Olegario and Trinny Verdugo
Owners of 11810 S 38th Ave, Laveen, AZ 85339
Parcel No. 300-09-072A
2

Dear Mr. Lorentzen and Members of the Board of Supervisors,
I am writing in strong opposition to Case Z240005 regarding the proposed event center at 3801 W. Carver Road.
This use is incompatible with Rural-43 zoning and the single-family residential character of the surrounding
neighborhood. The property is bordered by large-lot homes and privately held land, and residents chose this area for its
quiet, rural environment. Loud commercial events at this site have repeatedly disrupted the neighborhood and
generated numerous complaints to MCSO.
The area’s infrastructure cannot support commercial operations of any kind.
• 38th Avenue is an unmaintained dirt road not designed for high-volume traffic.
• Homes rely on private and often shared wells, many of which include covenants restricting water use to
single-family residential purposes only and explicitly prohibiting commercial or agricultural use.
• There is no sanitary sewer system; this and all surrounding properties depend on septic systems sized for
residential use. A commercial event venue poses a serious risk of groundwater depletion and contamination due
to excessive water demand and an undersized septic system.
For these reasons alone, the Special Use Permit should be denied.
However, the applicant’s documented history of violations makes approval even more inappropriate. Since purchasing
the property in October 2020, the owner has operated an event venue illegally and without permits. County Planning
and Development staff have already documented unpermitted construction, including alterations to a pre-fabricated
structure and grading activities that appear to have raised site elevations and altered stormwater runoff. These changes
have contributed to erosion on 38th Avenue and increased sediment deposition throughout the neighborhood.
During an earlier enforcement hearing, the owner insisted that the events were merely “family gatherings,” despite
overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The current SUP application confirms what residents have known all along: this
is part of a broader commercial event-venue business with multiple locations in the Phoenix area.
The applicant recently held a “neighborhood meeting,” Approximately 30–40 residents attended, and every single
attendee opposed the commercial use of this property.
Most concerning is the owner’s consistent pattern of ignoring county directives and continuing operations as she sees
fit. Over the past four to five years, she has repeatedly disregarded enforcement actions, zoning requirements, and the
judgment issued against her. There is no reason to believe she will comply with conditions of approval if this SUP is
granted.
I’d also like to point out that there was an event venue that was denied near the 43rd Ave and Carver area that was on a
main, paved road with limited residential housing which would be more conducive for an event venue than this property
and it was NOT approved.
Given the zoning incompatibility, infrastructure limitations, environmental risks, and the applicant’s long record of
non-compliance, I respectfully urge you to deny Case Z240005.
Sincerely,
Eric & Christine Baim

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: John Garretson <john.garretson@icloud.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2026 6:29 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: Kay Shepard
Subject: Case#su240005 regarding parcel APNB 300-09-014A
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Att: Andrew Lorentzen , Planner c/o Maricopa Planning and Development Department
I am John Garretson the manager of the Garretson South Mountain Properties LLC. We own Parcel
ID number 300-09-011F which is 65 aprox. acres
adjacent to the above referenced parcel which exceeds 20% of the land area surrounding case #
SU240005 which requested a special use permit for a
Wedding and events Venue. We are against granting such a Special Use permit. John Garretson,
480-370-3114
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: David White <davegwhite@cox.net>
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2026 10:04 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND); Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: Brandon White
Subject: Protest of Special Use Permit Application SU240005 Parcel 300-09-014A, Attn: Andrew
Lorentzen, Maricopa County Planning & Development Department and Supervisor
Steve Gallardo
Attachments: Calle Poco, Protest Opposed Wedding Venue Aerial Map.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
June ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 4, 2026 Maricopa County Planning & Development Department Attn: Andrew Lorentzen RE: Protest of Special Use Permit Application S U240005 Proposed Wedding and Events Venue – Parcel No. 300-09- 014A Dear Members of the Planning & Zoning
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive
messages from new senders. Always validate the sender first.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End
June 4, 2026
Maricopa County Planning & Development Department
Attn: Andrew Lorentzen
RE: Protest of Special Use Permit Application SU240005
Proposed Wedding and Events Venue – Parcel No. 300-09-014A
Dear Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission, Supervisor Steve Gallardo, Members of
the Board of Supervisors, and Planning Staff:
I am writing to formally protest and oppose Special Use Permit Application SU240005 for the
proposed wedding and events venue on Parcel No. 300-09-014A.
I am the owner of Maricopa County Parcels 300-09-075 and 300-09-076, which are located
within approximately 45 feet from the proposed venue site. As one of the closest neighboring
property owners, I respectfully request that this letter be included in the official record and
considered by Planning Staff, the Planning & Zoning Commission, Supervisor Gallardo, and
the Board of Supervisors.
My opposition is based on several significant concerns regarding compatibility, safety,
infrastructure, property rights, and the long-term impact this commercial use would have on
our neighborhood.
First and foremost, this proposal is incompatible with the existing Rural-43 zoning and the
residential character of the area. This community consists of large-lot residential properties
1

adjacent to South Mountain Park and Preserve. Property owners invested here with the
expectation that neighboring properties would remain residential in nature and consistent
with the area's rural character. A commercial wedding and events venue is fundamentally
different from the residential uses that surround it.
The proposed venue would bring regular commercial activity into a quiet residential
neighborhood, including large gatherings, amplified music, event traffic, vendors, rideshare
vehicles, deliveries, outdoor lighting, and late-night activity. These impacts are not consistent
with the peaceful residential environment that currently exists.
Traffic and access present another serious concern. Access to the property requires travel
along approximately one-half mile of private roadway and easements through an existing
residential neighborhood. These roads were designed to serve local residents, not
commercial events with dozens or potentially hundreds of guests.
The roadway contains several safety challenges, including narrow sections, limited
maneuvering space, flood-prone areas during storm events, a bridge crossing near the SRP
Western Canal, poor nighttime visibility, lack of street lighting, and road conditions that are
privately maintained rather than built to commercial standards. Introducing wedding and
event traffic onto this roadway will increase risks for residents, visitors, and emergency
responders.
Emergency access and fire safety are also major concerns. The property is located adjacent
to South Mountain Park and Preserve, an area that is particularly vulnerable to wildfire risk.
Increased vehicle traffic, outdoor events, and commercial activity near the preserve create
additional concerns regarding emergency response capability and fire protection. The
surrounding infrastructure was never designed to support a commercial entertainment venue
of this nature.
As one of the nearest property owners, I am particularly concerned about the direct impacts
on my property. The proposed venue would introduce noise, headlights, parking activity,
outdoor lighting, and late-night events within close proximity to my land. These impacts
would substantially interfere with the quiet enjoyment of my property and diminish the rural
atmosphere that attracted me to this area.
My family has invested in these parcels with plans to construct two luxury custom homes.
One of the primary reasons for acquiring these properties was their unique setting by South
Mountain Park and the scenic mountain views that define this area. The introduction of a
commercial event venue would negatively affect those views, reduce privacy, alter the
character of the neighborhood, and undermine the value of our investment.
This area is valued for its natural beauty, dark skies, open space, and tranquility. Those
qualities are increasingly rare in Maricopa County and deserve protection. A wedding and
events venue hosting large gatherings, outdoor activities, amplified music, and evening
2

events is simply not compatible with the preserve environment or the surrounding residential
community.
I also understand that a substantial number of neighboring property owners oppose this
application. See the attached protest for 65 Acres we received from John Garretson delivered
to Maricopa County in opposition where over 3/4 of the neighbors contiguous to the
proposed Wedding venue appear in opposition with property values far exceeding that of the
proposed commercial Wedding Venue property. Based on discussions within the
community, it appears that a significant majority of the adjacent property owners share
concerns regarding traffic, safety, noise, property values, and the long-term impact on the
neighborhood.
Commercial event facilities are better suited for locations specifically planned and equipped
for commercial activity, with public roads, adequate infrastructure, lighting, municipal
services, and emergency access designed to accommodate large gatherings. This property
and its surrounding neighborhood do not possess those characteristics.
For all of these reasons, I respectfully request that the Planning & Zoning Commission
recommend denial and that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors deny Special Use
Permit Application SU240005.
Thank you for your consideration and for including this protest letter in the official public
record.
Respectfully submitted,
David G. White, Manager
David G. White PLLC
Owner, Parcels 300-09-075 and 300-09-076
davegwhite@cox.net
602-525-6622
Attached Protest Letter from John Garretson and Aerial Map:
Depicting a Partial View of Properties in Opposition to the Commercial Wedding Venue by
South Mountain Park:
3

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 2:34 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission
Recommendation
From: noreply@civicplus.com <noreply@civicplus.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 2:27 PM
To: PND PZAppeal <PNDPZAppeal@maricopa.gov>
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However,
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of
Supervisors hearing.
Name Tom Kingston
Email Address tomkingston@q.com
Address 11820 S. 38th Ave.
City Laveen
State Maricopa
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number 4802444906
Fax Number Field not completed.
Case Number / Project SU240005
Name
1

Planning & Zoning June 1, 2026
Commission Hearing
Date
Reason for the I am writing in opposition to Special Use Permit SU240005.
Objection of the Subject
Case I have lived on this road for approximately 20 years and built
my home here because it is a rural residential area. The
proposed use is not compatible with the character of our
neighborhood and would negatively affect the surrounding
residents.
Our road is a dead-end residential road with limited
infrastructure and no urban services. The area was not
designed to accommodate commercial-scale events, frequent
large gatherings, or significant increases in traffic.
Residents have already experienced impacts associated with
event activity at this property, including:
Excessive traffic on a narrow rural road.
Increased dust and vehicle speeds on largely unpaved
roadways.
Noise from music and gatherings that disrupt neighboring
properties.
Litter and trash associated with visitors.
Large numbers of unfamiliar vehicles and visitors entering a
residential neighborhood.
Safety concerns for residents, children, pets, and emergency
access.
Additionally, this property shares access to a private well
system with neighboring properties. Increased activity and
occupancy raise concerns regarding water usage,
infrastructure impacts, and the suitability of the property for
ongoing event operations.
All of the homeowners on our street who have discussed this
matter oppose the permit. We chose to live in this area
because of its rural residential character, privacy, and quiet
enjoyment of our properties. Granting this permit would
fundamentally change the nature of the neighborhood and
place the interests of a single property owner above those of
the surrounding residents who have invested years and, in
many cases, decades in their homes.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that Maricopa County
deny Special Use Permit SU240005.
2

Thank you for your consideration.
Electronic Signature I agree.
Agreement
Electronic Signature Thomas Matthew Kingston
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
3

Dear Mr. Lorentzen & County Supervisors:
I am in opposition of Wedding Venue SU240005 at 3801 W. Carver Road.
The precedence has already been established and should be followed without exception in the
case. On September 23, 2021, Supervisor Gallardo and the complete Board of Supervisors voted
8-0 against case# Z2019135, the Enchanted Garden Wedding Venue, which was to be located on
W. Carver Road and approximately S. 44th Avenue. This proposed venue was going to be a clean
sheet design on a main arterial road and FAILED to meet the necessary threshold approval
requirements to approval. SU240005 Legends pales in its efforts to meet, let alone exceed criteria
for approval. Supervisor Gallardo did a site visit during case Z2019135 and told the residents of
the area that a wedding venue was incompatible with the area and that it would not happen.
An event center is a completely incompatible and irresponsible use for a property zoned as Rural-
43 within an established residential neighborhood with large lot single family residential
bordering all four sides of the property and South Mountain Park within ¼ mile of the property.
If you are not familiar with the area, the site lies between Carver Mountain and South Mountain
in a valley that is primarily part of Maricopa County with small patches of land that is incorporated
as City of Phoenix. Speaking for myself and my neighbors, the attraction of this area is the quiet
rural nature that is also relatively close to downtown Phoenix. Loud parties/events that have been
held at this location have resulted in numerous calls/complaints to MCSO.
In this regard, all infrastructure in the area is designed solely for single family zoning and use.
Many of the roads outside of the main arterial through the area are gravel/dirt roads that receive
very little to no grading or maintenance (38th Avenue included), to which the owners of 3801 W
Carver Rd are supposed to maintain, but have failed to do so as other neighbors have footed the
bill to keep up on the grading and maintenance. Water for the homes in the area is supplied by
private wells, often wells that are shared between neighbors as there is no municipal water supply
on 38th Avenue. This home is on a shared well with an agreement that clearly states that it cannot
be used for commercial use. I suspect that this issue is pertinent to this property/applicant and
has been overlooked or ignored. The applicant has not been truthful within their application that
states that they are on city services for water. Similarly, there are no sanitary sewer services in
the area and all the homes in the area rely upon septic systems. I am certain that this 2-bedroom
home’s septic system is not designed or able to handle the water volume generated by large
venue generated parties. I am very concerned that if approved or if this applicant is allowed to
continue operation of the event venue that the groundwater will be affected by excessive
withdrawal and/or contamination due to an undersized septic system.
Furthermore, you and the county supervisors should be aware that the applicant and property
owner have been illegally operating an event center shortly after the residence and shop was
purchased from the prior owner in October of 2020. Unpermitted work that has been performed
at the site has previously been documented by Planning and Development personnel and has
included modifications to a pre-fabricated garage that may have included removal or alterations
of shear members or bracing, grading and drainage work performed to construct a rudimentary

parking lot that likely raised grades by more than 12-inches and may have altered historic
stormwater runoff by increasing discharge and/or altering discharge locations off the lot (recent
runoff from storm events after these modifications has severely eroded 38th Avenue and increase
sediment deposits in other areas of the neighborhood. Sometime on or around June 1st 2026,
they brought in 2 truckloads of dirt and buried a culvert in a wash without an approved Grading
and Drainage Plan. A major concern, also addressed by the County, is the issue of fire safety. The
venue does not have a fire suppression system, which is required per the NFPA 72 with an
occupancy load of 100 or more, which their application is stating an occupancy of up to 150
guests. This building is clearly not safe for the wedding venue they are trying to operate.
During an initial hearing regarding these complaints and meetings with Planning and
Development that was presided by a Hearing Officer, the owner at first falsely claimed that all of
the activities were family gatherings and were not commercial events but then finally admitting
that it was a wedding venue. At this hearing, the Hearing Officer ordered a judgement against this
owner and was told that any violation would be subject to a fine. I have personally sent numerous
emails from this hearing through now, which can be verified through Donna Gerron, showing with
pictures all the events that she has had at the property. We did in fact talk to some of the people
heading up there and they did confirm paying for the venue. The owner did get a recorded
violation on April 30, 2025.
Recently, the owner mailed/delivered flies to the residents in the area for a “neighborhood
meeting” to try and sell the area on their plans. I understand this to be an attempt to meet
requirements that Planning and Development has as part of the SUP process. Approximately 30
to 40 people attended this event. The owner was not there; she sent an employee/business
partner in her stead with no answers. Make no mistake, every member of the community that
attended was and is OPPOSED to this event venue and commercial business operating at this site.
The owner has ignored all directives that resulted from the aforementioned hearing and has
continued to operate as she sees fit. She does not care about the neighborhood or neighbors and
is only driven by financial gain.
Based upon these concerns, I respectfully request that this application for a Special Use Permit
SU240005 be denied.
Sincerely,
Matt White
11819 S 38th Avenue


Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 4:40 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Anlly
Last Name Acosta
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 3015 N 111th Dr
City Avondale
State AZ
Zip Code 85392
Phone Number 6234193390
Email Address anllydayanah@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 4:48 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Dayanah
Last Name Acosta
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 3015 N 111th Dr
City Avondale
State AZ
Zip Code 85392
Phone Number 6234148154
Email Address dayanahacosta@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 4:40 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Gabriel
Last Name Acosta
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address Field not completed.
City Field not completed.
State Field not completed.
Zip Code Field not completed.
Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address gabrielacosta_0420@hotmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1


Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 5:36 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Enrique “Henry”
Last Name Ahumada
Representing Cielo
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 3734 W Encanto Blvd
City Phoenix
State AZ
Zip Code 85009
Phone Number 480-343-1387
Email Address enriqueahumada744@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2026 8:32 AM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name DELFINA
Last Name Anarillas
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 4605 W COPLEN FARMS RD
City LAVEEN
State AZ
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number 6027080468
Email Address DELFINA@MOCACC.COM
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 6:25 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name gisel
Last Name avila
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Speak in favor. , Not speak, but let the Board know I am in
favor.
Address 11343 S 39th Ln
City Laveen
State AZ
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number 6025614436
Email Address gisel.avila52@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 8:07 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Guadalupe
Last Name Avila
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 11343 S 39th Ln
City Laveen
State AZ
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number 602 721 1149
Email Address Giselurizabel1@hotmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 4:08 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Jesus
Last Name Avila
Representing Vanessa
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 11343 S 39th Ln
City Laveen
State AZ
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number 6233301532
Email Address Jaau199@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 4:13 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Tigre
Last Name Avila
Representing Vanessa
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 11343 S 39th Ln
City Laveen
State AZ
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number 6233301532
Email Address Avilaprocess@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 3:41 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Alex
Last Name Balderrama
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 1331 w baseline rd
City Mesa
State Az
Zip Code 85202
Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address balderrama1313@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 11:01 AM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Henry
Last Name Balderrama
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 9625 N 11th Ave Unit 2
City Phoenix
State AZ
Zip Code 85021
Phone Number 6027028685
Email Address enriquehbalderrama@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 6:43 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Lucas
Last Name Flores
Representing Vanessa
I want to: Speak in favor.
Address 2110 Concours Cy
City El Cajon
State California
Zip Code 92019
Phone Number 6195994113
Email Address lucas_flores77@yahoo.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 9:29 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or Case SU240005
Topic
First Name Maria
Last Name Martinez
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 6343 W Ellis Dr
City Laveen
State AZ
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number 6025708958
Email Address maria.martinez9928@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2026 8:35 AM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name ALEXANDER
Last Name MOCTEZUMA
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 4605 W COPLEN FARMS RD
City LAVEEN
State Arizona
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number 6025890783
Email Address alex@mocacc.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

MARICOPA COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT — Special Use Permit Case No. SU240005
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing this letter in strong support of Vanessa Montes and her request for the Special Use Permit associated
with Case No. SU240005.
Vanessa has generously opened her property to members of the Catholic church community, allowing the
location to be used for Mass, church gatherings, and other community activities. She has provided this
opportunity without expecting anything in return. Her willingness to share the property has been a meaningful
service to the local community.
Over time, approximately three different church communities have been able to utilize this location. Collectively,
these church communities serve approximately 200 individuals, giving families and community members an
opportunity to gather for worship and fellowship in a welcoming environment.
Vanessa’s generosity demonstrates her commitment to giving back to the community. Rather than seeking only
personal benefit from her property, she has continued to make it available to others and has helped provide a
place where people can come together in faith, fellowship, and community.
For these reasons, I respectfully ask the Maricopa County Planning & Development Department to consider
Vanessa’s positive contributions to the community and approve her Special Use Permit for Case No. SU240005.
Granting this permit would allow Vanessa to continue providing a valuable resource to the church communities.
Thank you for your time and consideration of this request.
Respectfully,
Name:
Address:
9802 W Van Buren St Unit 183 Tolleson, Az 85353
Phone:
(480) 221-6261
Email: moisesdragon712@gmail.com
Date: 9/10/2026

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 6:09 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Field not completed.
Last Name Field not completed.
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Speak in favor.
Address Field not completed.
City Field not completed.
State Field not completed.
Zip Code Field not completed.
Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address Judithgaona2005@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 4:03 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Gabriela
Last Name Quintero
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Speak in favor. , Not speak, but let the Board know I am in
favor.
Address 10316 w. Encanto Blvd
City Avondale
State Az
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number 6024602663
Email Address Cazablancaphx@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
1


MARIANA SANDOVAL LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT 23
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
COMMITTEE ON LAND,
1700 WEST WASHINGTON AGRICULTURE, RURAL AFFAIRS,
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 RANKING MEMBER
PHONE: (602) 926-3740 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
MSANDOVAL@AZLEG.GOV
State of Arizona LATINO CAUCUS CO-CHAIR
House of Representatives
August 31, 2026
Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
301 W. Jefferson Street, 1st Floor, Suite 170
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
RE: Planning and Zoning Commission Hearing on September 10, 2026 for a Special Use
Permit Request, Case SU240005; Cielo by Legends
To Whom It May Concern:
We are pleased to offer our support for Cielo by Legends, a proposed small event venue in
Laveen, Arizona, owned and operated by local small business owner Vanessa Cázarez Montes.
Laveen is a community experiencing significant growth and development, and with that growth
comes an increasing need for gathering places that serve residents, families, and local
organizations. Small event spaces are an important part of a thriving community, providing
residents with appropriate venues for celebrations, community meetings, nonprofit events, family
gatherings, and other meaningful occasions without requiring a large-scale facility.
Cielo by Legends presents an opportunity to meet that need in a thoughtful and appropriately
scaled manner. The property encompasses more than four acres, while the proposal seeks permits
to accommodate up to 100 guests. This is a modest event capacity that can provide a valuable
community resource while remaining consistent with the character and continued development
of Laveen.
Just as importantly, Vanessa Cázarez Montes has demonstrated a genuine commitment to the
community she serves. She is not simply an entrepreneur seeking to establish a business; she is
an engaged member of our local business community who has consistently shown that she cares
about the people and organizations that make Laveen a strong place to live and work. Her
charitable involvement and support of causes throughout our community reflect a commitment to
giving back and creating opportunities for others.
As a small business owner, Vanessa also represents the kind of local entrepreneurship that
contributes to a healthy and vibrant economy. Locally owned businesses create jobs, keep
resources within the community, and often have a personal investment in the success and well-
being of the neighborhoods they serve.
It is our belief that Cielo by Legends can become a positive addition to Laveen by providing a
needed small-scale venue while contributing to the area’s continued economic and community
development. We respectfully encourage consideration of the proposed permits and support
Vanessa Cázarez Montes in her efforts to establish Cielo by Legends as a valued community
asset.

Thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact our office should you require any
additional information regarding our support for this project.
Sincerely,
Rep. Mariana Sandoval Senator Catherine Miranda
Arizona House of Representatives, LD 23 Arizona State Senate, LD 11
Latino Caucus Co-Chair Latino Caucus Co-Chair

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 4:55 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name David
Last Name Tapia
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 9234 W Serrano St
City Phoenix
State AZ
Zip Code 85037
Phone Number 6024136356
Email Address dtap82@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

July 22, 2025
To whom it may concern,
Re: Vanessa Montes Cazarez - 3801 W. Carver Rd Laveen, AZ 85339
My name is Ana Urizabel, I am the owner of the residence located at 11343 South 39th Lane Laveen, AZ
85339. My property is about 0.4 miles from Vanessa’s . I believe that her venue project is a great idea!
The location and view from that address is incredible and I think anybody who uses her venue would have
the opportunity to create unforgettable memories. With this being said, the property sits on 4 acres of
land, giving plenty of space for nearby neighbors to still enjoy their privacy and quiet. Although this
venue project idea is still gaining traction within the Laveen area, I think it would be beneficial to
residents since there would be new business ventures coming into Laveen giving way for more economic
growth.
If you have any questions feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ana Urizabel
602-348-9010

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 8:54 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Bianca
Last Name Urizabel
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 3001N
City phoenix
State Az
Zip Code 85031
Phone Number 480 408 0304
Email Address Biancadanitza2008@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: noreply@civicplus.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2026 4:10 PM
To: COB Agenda Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Board of Supervisors Speakers Form
Meeting Date 9/10/2026
Agenda Item Number or SU240005
Topic
First Name Flor
Last Name Vargas
Representing Field not completed.
I want to: Not speak, but let the Board know I am in favor.
Address 7414 s 63rd ave
City Laveen
State AZ
Zip Code 85339
Phone Number Field not completed.
Email Address Florivetvargas@gmail.com
Please Note:
This document becomes a public record. Disclosure of the above information is
optional but would enable the Chairman or County Staff to reach you if necessary.
Guidelines for Speakers
1