13.SU240007 BOS REPORT (FOR PRINTING).PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2026-10-21)

View PDF Item 120 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf_layout) 105502 characters
Report to the Board of Supervisors
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Board Hearing Date: October 21, 2026
Case #/Title: SU240007 – Wranglers Roost
Supervisorial District: 3
Applicant/Owner: Reid Stewart, Imagine Properties LLC
Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for event venue rental in the Rural-43
zoning district
Site Location: Generally located approximately 1,214’ northeast of the NEC of
New River Rd. & 27th Avenue in the New River area
Site Size: 75,276 sq. ft.
County Island Status: N/A
Additional
Comments:
 The proposed SUP is for an outdoor wedding and events venue. The venue will operate on Fridays
and Saturdays 8AM-11PM and 8AM-10:30PM Sundays and major holidays. Attendance will be
limited to a maximum 100 people. A new ADA-compliant restroom building will be provided
(because existing buildings on site are not accessible nor authorized for public assembly
occupancy and thus will not be part of the special use).
 Water is provided by an on-site well. Wastewater disposal is via onsite septic system. The new
restroom building will tie into this existing system.
 The site has driveway (private internal roadway easement) access onto New River Rd. Access will
be graded and dust controlled.
 The site is designated for Rural Densities in the Daisy Mountain New River Area Plan. It is within
a Rural Influence Area and is in a Rural Service Area per the county’s Framework 2040
comprehensive plan.
 Staff received letters representing 43 parcels in support and 13 parcels in opposition. Opposition
letters specifically express concerns with noise, lighting, increased traffic and loss of rural
atmosphere.
 SUP approval will require majority vote of a quorum.
October 21, 2026
SU240007
Page 1 of 4

Commission
Recommendation: On 9/10/26, the Commission voted 7-0 (motion by Chair Milhaven
D2, seconded by Commissioner Whitney D3) to adopt a motion
recommending the Board of Supervisors approve SU240007
subject to conditions ‘a’ to ‘r’:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled
“Wranglers Roost SUP Site Plan“, consisting of 3 full-size sheets, dated March 31, 2026,
except as modified by the following conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Narrative Report”, consisting of 28 pages, stamped received March 5, 2026, except
as modified by the following conditions.
c. This special use permit is valid for a period of five years and shall expire on October 21,
2031, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more consecutive days, whichever
occurs first.
d. Events shall be limited to 8AM-11PM Fridays and Saturdays, and 8AM-10:30PM Sundays
and federally recognized major calendar holidays (New Year’s Day, Birthday of Martin Luther
King, Jr., Presidents’ Day, Memorial Day, Juneteenth National Independence Day,
Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving & Christmas)
e. At least one (1) employee must be on site or able to be made physically available on site at
all times during scheduled events. The name and telephone number of the employee must
be posted and identified at the New River Rd. entrance, in a conspicuous location to the site
at all times during events. This is intended to allow neighbors who wish to make noise or
other complaint and responding officers to be able to make contact with an appropriate
property representative during an event.
f. String-style bistro lighting, and palm tree lighting up to 30’ high, shall not exceed 1,000
lumens as measured outside the special use permit boundary and shall be shut off nightly
by 11:00 PM.
g. All other outdoor lighting must be fully shielded so that light is emitted downward no less
than 20 degrees below the horizontal plane at the bottom of the light fixture.
h. There shall be no noise that exceeds 65 decibels or the background ambient noise level of
the surrounding neighborhood, whichever is greater, as measured outside the Special Use
Permit boundary.
i. The following engineering conditions shall apply:
1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All
development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for
construction.
2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site
layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design required for permitting of the
site’s drainage infrastructure.
October 21, 2026
SU240007
Page 2 of 4

3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the
application for Building Permits. The plans must be in accordance with the Commercial
Checklist. See link: https://apps.pnd.maricopa.gov/plansubmittalchecklist
4. The above comments do not include identification of utilities or underground facilities
within or adjacent to the required right-of-way that may have prior rights and/or require
relocation.
5. Prior to the Building Permit Approval, the Drainage Access and Maintenance Easement
must be recorded and the recordation information added to the plans.
6. Prior to the Building Permit Approval for site improvement, the entire Special Use Permit
(SUP) area must be identified and the area must physically drain to the Retention Basin.
The Drainage Area Map must accurately show what area drains to the Retention
Basin. The contributing area must be updated to include the proposed parcel boundary
adjustment area and other areas of the SUP.
j. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the restroom building, the SUP area must be
consolidated into a single parcel.
k. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the
emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in
accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection
service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local
fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required.
l. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Special Use
Permit by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in
accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County
Zoning Ordinance.
m. The purpose of this special use permit is to allow the property owner to lease the site for the
purpose of lessee to host private invitation-only outdoor events. These events shall not be
open to the general public and thus shall not charge an admission/entrance fee to the
attendees.
n. The historic home structure is not permitted for public assembly use unless a certificate of
occupancy is issued for the structure. Prior to occupying the existing residence or any
portion thereof for public assembly, the applicant shall obtain a building permit
demonstrating compliance with commercial building code as applicable and shall obtain a
certificate of occupancy for the renovated building prior to any public assembly occupancy.
If certificate of occupancy is obtained, no additional SUP revision or amendment is required.
o. Attendance on-site is limited to a maximum of 100 persons total at any given time during
events. This number is cumulative of all parcels that comprise the special use permit site.
p. All driveways and parking areas shall be paved or surfaced to control dust in a manner
acceptable to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department.
q. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant,
with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application,
subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the
time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property may be considered for
revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated
October 21, 2026
SU240007
Page 3 of 4

and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the
expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of
application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution
in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such
revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the
value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and
reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use
Permit had never been granted.
r. Prior to hosting any events on site all accrued non-compliance penalties accrued against the
subject parcels and all adjacent parcels under related ownership or control (geographic area
currently covered by APNs 202-29-085B, 202-29-085C, 202-29-086, 202-29-087A, 202-29-
087B, 202-29-087C, 202-29-088D, 202-29-088E) shall be brought current and paid in full; and
all verified violations on said parcels shall be verified compliant and closed.
Presented by: Andrew Lorentzen, Planner
Reviewed by: Darren Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager
Attachment: 9/10/26 P&Z Packet (101 pages)
Public comment submitted documents (207 pages) Not attached in hard copy but available on Agenda Center
Note: 9/10/26 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can be provided upon
request later, or accessed via Agenda Center, when available.
October 21, 2026
SU240007
Page 4 of 4

Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Case: SU240007 – Wranglers Roost
Hearing Date: September 10, 2026 (Continued from June 11 and July 23, 2026)
Supervisor District: 3
Applicant/Owner: Reid Stewart, Imagine Properties LLC
Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for event venue rental in the Rural-43 zoning
district
Site Location: Generally located approximately 1,214’ northeast of the NEC of New River
Rd. & 27th Avenue in the New River area
Site Size: 75,276 sq. ft.
Density: N/A
County Island: No
County Plan: New River Area Plan – Rural Densities (0-1 d.u./ac.)
Municipal Plan: N/A
Municipal Comments: None received to date
Support/Opposition: 43 in support / 13 in opposition
Recommendation: Approve with conditions
SU240007
Page 1 of 11

Project Summary:
1. The applicant is proposing a Special Use Permit (SUP) for an event venue operation on an
approximately 1-acre site zoned Rural-43 in the New River area. The site is located on the north
side of New River Rd. between 23rd Ave. and 27th Ave. The Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
(MCZO) under Article 1001.1.10 allows for Special Event Venues with a special use permit on a
site of at least three acres. This application predates the current ordinance requirement (effective
1/9/26).
2. Wranglers Roost is a historic stagecoach stop and area landmark dating back to the territorial
era. The site previously received special use permits for a guest ranch and rodeo facility operation
in 1986 and received subsequent additional approvals and time extensions in 1990 and 1996. The
guest ranch and rodeo grounds were part of a larger approximately 26-acre ranch that has since
been split into smaller parcels via unregulated land divisions and those previous special uses
discontinued. The current site is approximately just under two acres in size though is currently
entirely surrounded by parcels from the same ownership group. It’s important to note that the
site straddles two parcels that if consolidated would cover approximately five acres thus meeting
ordinance requirement for event venues to sit on sites of at least three acres.
3. The parcel has been the subject of open violations dating back to 2019 under V201900098 for
operating a commercial wedding/event venue business. The violations were originally opened for
investigation due to citizen complaints of excessive noise and lighting. The light issue stems from
the use of commercially available ‘string’ style bistro lighting which has been erected across the
majority of the yard and a portion of the parking area to illuminate the space for nighttime use.
Noise complaints were responded to by the Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office (MCSO) including
reports of multiple instances of response to calls in the same night. It’s important to note that the
applicant has not hosted any special events since entering into an agreement with the County in
July 2024. Since that time the applicant has been leasing dwellings on the greater property as
short-term rentals (STR) but the STRs have not been for special events. An SUP or Commercial
zoning is required for a special event venue.
4. The applicant is now requesting an SUP to lease out the facility for weddings and other special
events. The site consists of a large open yard and pool area for congregation. A gazebo and
smaller outbuilding surround the yard area. The historic residence is not included in the
operational scope, as the proposed event venue is entirely outdoors with the exception of the
proposed restrooms. (It’s important to note the historic residence is available for short-term rental
to a wedding party but cannot be used for public assembly unless it gains benefit of a completed
commercial construction permit.) The application states one employee will manage the parcel
for showings, cleanings and changeovers. At the same time, each user is generally free to operate
their event being mindful of proposed light and noise curfews of 12:00 AM. Note that staff’s
recommendation is for more limited hours of event operation.
5. The proposal is to install an ADA compliant restroom building which will be served via existing
well and septic system. The restroom will be constructed as an additional building on the site.
The proposed use includes 47 parking spaces with three additional ADA spaces. At present,
overflow parking is available via neighboring parcels though it is not included in the request and
is located outside of the identified SUP area. Parking areas will be dust-proofed per Maricopa
County Air Quality standards. Note that staff will recommend all driveways and parking area be
paved / surfaced.
SU240007
Page 2 of 11

2026 Aerial Photo
SU240007
Page 3 of 11

Zoning District map
Site Plan
SU240007
Page 4 of 11

Site photos provided by the applicant.
SU240007
Page 5 of 11

Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use:
6. On-site: Rural-43 / Single Family Residential
North: Rural-43 / Single Family Residential
South: Rural-43 / Single Family Residential
East: Rural-43 / Single Family Residential
West: Rural-43 / Single Family Residential
Utilities and Services:
7. Water: Well
Wastewater: Septic
Fire: Daisy Mountain Fire District
Police: Maricopa County Sherriff
Right-of-Way:
8. The following table includes existing and proposed half-width right-of-way and the future
classification based upon the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Major
Streets and Routes Plan.
Street Name Half-width Existing R/W Half-width Proposed R/W Future Classification
New River Rd. 30-feet 30-feet Minor Arterial
Adopted Plan:
SU240007
Page 6 of 11

9. New River Area Plan (Updated November, 2019): The parcel is listed as Rural Densities which
allow residential uses at a minimum of 1 dwelling unit per acre.
Public Participation Summary:
10. The applicant has completed the required public notification. Public right-of-way frontage, in front
of and at the entrance to the site was posted in two locations along New River Rd. The applicant
sent letters to all property owners within 300‘of the parent parcels. During the technical advisory
committee, staff recommended a larger notification radius to alleviate any concerns that notice
was insufficient due to fact that all immediately surrounding properties were owned or controlled
by the same or related parties. Ultimately an acceptable notification radius extension was not
agreed upon. The applicant expressed concerned with being held to notification requirements
more extensive than those applied to other similar applications.
11. The applicant has provided a statement that a neighborhood meeting was held on November 25,
2024 at the subject location. The statement indicates that nine persons were in attendance
though no names or addresses were provided. The results of the meeting were not provided.
12. Staff has received 43 letters/emails of support and 13 letters/e-mails in opposition to SU240007.
The concerns raised include: lighting, noise, traffic and loss of rural atmosphere.
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies:
13. N/A
Staff Analysis:
14. Staff has concerns with the business plan as presented for Wranglers Roost. The application
requests the availability to lease the parcel to individuals to host private events without the
oversight of traditional venue operations such as employees or security. The violation history and
public comments that have been received indicate a level of carelessness for existing ordinances
and regulations such as noise and light. Staff recommends all events require an onsite staff
member to ensure facility regulations are enforced and to act as a liaison for any potential
neighbor issues that may arise.
15. Staff recognizes the potential impacts a wedding and event venue creates for the surrounding
residential neighborhood. Noise and lighting can have larger impacts on surrounding residences
as events are generally held in the evening. Staff proposes a limit to events only occurring on
weekends (Friday, Saturday or Sunday). While potentially burdensome on the applicant, this will
give the neighborhood an expectation of times the venue can operate with the least impacts to
the local community.
16. While the parcel is/was part of a larger ranch, the requested SUP area only encompasses the
small approximate acre on which the historic building sits. Forty-seven parking spaces have been
provided (3 ADA spaces). Due to parking provided and event venue size, staff recommends
limiting events to 100 guests and staff.
17. The string style bistro light fixtures referenced within consist of many unshielded bulbs that do
not direct light in any specific direction. While similar fixtures are generally used for accent or
ambiance lighting, these have been specifically installed to utilize higher intensity bulbs which
illuminate the space for the outdoor venue purposes. Multiple letters of opposition reference
SU240007
Page 7 of 11

these lights specifically as they provide light trespass and glare in the community. Staff is
amenable to such ambiance lighting when used only during specified hours to light the event
space. Continued regular use not associated with event hours has been cited in neighbor letters
and is the source of much neighbor contention.
18. Noise, specifically amplified music, has been cited as a reason why neighbors became aware of
and are opposed to the venue. Unmitigated amplification with no limit on maximum decibel or
time limit can be expected to lead to continued noise complaints. While staff respects the
applicant’s request to operate a venue, they still have an obligation to be a good respectful
neighbor. The application does not propose any indoor music or dancing facilities, all instances
would occur outdoors. The applicant’s desire to allow music until midnight is out of character
with the rural neighborhood. Staff proposes a limit on all noise to not exceed 55 decibels
measured outside the SUP boundaries.
19. Finally, staff is recommending a five-year SUP timeframe. This allows all parties to reconvene on
the matter in five years to allow for more discourse to determine if the outdoor event venue use
has proved to be a good neighbor and appropriate for the area. If so, the applicant may then seek
a SUP time extension.
20. Staff believes an event venue operating at the historic landmark can be appropriate and in concert
with the surrounding rural residential neighborhood if subject to conditions limiting the hours of
operations, protecting nighttime skies, restricting noise decibel and crowd size, etc. In previous
decades the site successfully housed an activity / entertainment center for the New River
community.
21. The case was presented at the July 23, 2026 Commission hearing. The applicant indicated to the
Commission a desire to amend the recommend conditions. The Commission continued the case
to today’s hearing and instructed staff to further refine the recommended conditions of SUP
approval.
22. It should be noted that as of January 9, 2026, the county’s zoning ordinance requires a minimum
three-acre area for an event venue SUP. Staff considers the subject application which has been
pending for two years, to be grandfathered regarding the minimum three-acre land area
requirement.
Recommendation:
23. Staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion recommending that the Board of Supervisors
approve SU240007 subject to the following conditions ‘a’ –‘r’:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled
“Wranglers Roost SUP Site Plan“, consisting of 3 full-size sheets, dated March 31, 2026,
except as modified by the following conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Narrative Report”, consisting of 28 pages, stamped received March 5, 2026, except
as modified by the following conditions.
c. This special use permit is valid for a period of five years and shall expire on October 21,
2031, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more consecutive days, whichever
occurs first.
SU240007
Page 8 of 11

d. Events shall be limited to 8AM-11PM Fridays and Saturdays, and 8AM-10:30PM Sundays
and federally recognized major calendar holidays (New Year’s Day, Birthday of Martin Luther
King, Jr., Presidents’ Day, Memorial Day, Juneteenth National Independence Day,
Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving & Christmas)
e. At least one (1) employee must be on site or able to be made physically available on site at
all times during scheduled events. The name and telephone number of the employee must
be posted and identified at the New River Rd. entrance, in a conspicuous location to the site
at all times during events. This is intended to allow neighbors who wish to make noise or
other complaint and responding officers to be able to make contact with an appropriate
property representative during an event.
f. String-style bistro lighting, and palm tree lighting up to 30’ high, shall not exceed 1,000
lumens as measured outside the special use permit boundary and shall be shut off nightly
by 11:00 PM.
g. All other outdoor lighting must be fully shielded so that light is emitted downward no less
than 20 degrees below the horizontal plane at the bottom of the light fixture.
h. There shall be no noise that exceeds 65 decibels or the background ambient noise level of
the surrounding neighborhood, whichever is greater, as measured outside the Special Use
Permit boundary.
i. The following engineering conditions shall apply:
1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All
development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for
construction.
2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site
layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design required for permitting of the
site’s drainage infrastructure.
3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the
application for Building Permits. The plans must be in accordance with the Commercial
Checklist. See link: https://apps.pnd.maricopa.gov/plansubmittalchecklist
4. The above comments do not include identification of utilities or underground facilities
within or adjacent to the required right-of-way that may have prior rights and/or require
relocation.
5. Prior to the Building Permit Approval, the Drainage Access and Maintenance Easement
must be recorded and the recordation information added to the plans.
6. Prior to the Building Permit Approval for site improvement, the entire Special Use Permit
(SUP) area must be identified and the area must physically drain to the Retention Basin.
The Drainage Area Map must accurately show what area drains to the Retention
Basin. The contributing area must be updated to include the proposed parcel boundary
adjustment area and other areas of the SUP.
j. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the restroom building, the SUP area must be
consolidated into a single parcel.
SU240007
Page 9 of 11

k. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the
emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in
accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection
service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local
fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required.
l. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Special Use
Permit by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in
accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County
Zoning Ordinance.
m. The purpose of this special use permit is to allow the property owner to lease the site for the
purpose of lessee to host private invitation-only outdoor events. These events shall not be
open to the general public and thus shall not charge an admission/entrance fee to the
attendees.
n. The historic home structure is not permitted for public assembly use unless a certificate of
occupancy is issued for the structure. Prior to occupying the existing residence or any
portion thereof for public assembly, the applicant shall obtain a building permit
demonstrating compliance with commercial building code as applicable and shall obtain a
certificate of occupancy for the renovated building prior to any public assembly occupancy.
If certificate of occupancy is obtained, no additional SUP revision or amendment is required.
o. Attendance on-site is limited to a maximum of 100 persons total at any given time during
events. This number is cumulative of all parcels that comprise the special use permit site.
p. All driveways and parking areas shall be paved or surfaced to control dust in a manner
acceptable to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department.
q. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant,
with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application,
subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the
time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property may be considered for
revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated
and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the
expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of
application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution
in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such
revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the
value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and
reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use
Permit had never been granted.
r. Prior to hosting any events on site all accrued non-compliance penalties accrued against the
subject parcels and all adjacent parcels under related ownership or control (geographic area
currently covered by APNs 202-29-085B, 202-29-085C, 202-29-086, 202-29-087A, 202-29-
087B, 202-29-087C, 202-29-088D, 202-29-088E) shall be brought current and paid in full; and
all verified violations on said parcels shall be verified compliant and closed.
SU240007
Page 10 of 11

Presented by: Andrew Lorentzen, Planner
Reviewed by: Rachel Applegate, Planning Supervisor
Attachments: Case Map (1 page)
Site Plan (3 pages)
Narrative Report (27 pages)
SUP area legal description (3 pages)
Engineering comments (2 pages)
MCESD comments (2 pages)
Public Support & Opposition Map (1 page)
Appendix A - Support Letters (33 pages)
Appendix B - Opposition Letters (18 pages)
Public comment submitted documents (207 pages) Not attached in hard copy but available on Agenda Center
SU240007
Page 11 of 11

Application Name: Wrangler's Roost Event's Facility
Legal Description
7N-2E-25
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
(602) 316-3360
Jo Ann Long
SU240007
Case Address Parcel Primary:202-29-088D
2504 W NEW RIVER RD NEW RIVER, AZ 85087
NEW RIVER, AZ 85087
Generated May 13, 2026 11:52 AM Gross Acres: 1 approx. Map scale 1:767
Supervisor District No. 3
Rental and weddings and events
/
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ

BENCHMARK:
WRANGLER'S ROOST
SUP SITE PLAN
2504 W NEW RIVER RD, NEW RIVER, AZ 85087
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
ES
EM
ICV ICV
RD WRANGLER'S ROOST
RIVER 2504 W NEW RIVER RD
NEW
NEW RIVER, ARIZONA
COVER
SP01

BENCHMARK:
34
35
36
37
38
33
32
31 39
30
29
28
27
26 19
25
ES 24 20
23
22
21
EM
44
45
46
47 18
ICV ICV
48 17
49 16
15
50
14
13
3
12
4
5 11
6
7 10
8
9
2
1
40
40
41
42 NEW RIVER ROAD ENTRANCE
1
43 Scale: 1:20
WRANGLER'S ROOST
2504 W NEW RIVER RD
NEW RIVER, ARIZONA
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN SP02
1
Scale: 1:20

BENCHMARK:
ES
EM
AVE ICV ICV
27TH
RIVER RD
NEW
WRANGLER'S ROOST
2504 W NEW RIVER RD
NEW RIVER, ARIZONA
PARCEL ACCESS &
BOUNDARIES
OVERALL PARCEL BOUNDARY
1 Scale: 1:60 SP03

Narrative Report
A. Title Page
Project Name: Wranglers Roost
202-29-088D
General Location: North of New River Road, New River, Arizona 85087
2500 W New River Road, New River, Arizona 85087
Case Tracking Number: SU24007
Vicinity Map of Wrangler’s in Turquoise.

Vicinity Map showing larger area. Wrangler’s Roost is circled by the turquoise.


Photos of Historical Wrangler’s Roost

Aerial View of the Wranglers Roost before the road was pathed. Photo above,
July 1962 shows New River Road close to the original Wranglers Roost
entrance with no other building in site.

Wrangler’s Roost has a history of international visitors.
The historical use of Wranglers Roost began long before Maricopa Had any
permitting requirements. It has been used as a venue and gathering place for
nearly 100 years. We have spoken to people that were married at Wrangler’s
Roost 70 years ago. The permitting history goes back to the early 60’s with many
approved permits for special use at Wrangler’s Roost.

B. Purpose of Request:
Description of Proposal:
Special Use Permit for:
The Requested use is SUP for wedding & event venue.
APN # 202-29-088D.
C. Description of Proposed
PROPOSAL:
SUP for wedding & event venue.
The building is historical. County records show construction in 1931.
Uses: Weddings and Events and Property Rental
What we allow the guests to do:
Bring in a DJ, catered food, dancing, microphones, speakers, special lighting for
the event and possible entertainment.
Noise: All speakers and music will be turned off by midnight.
Light Hours: We want lights in the palm trees. String Lights are shielded and
connected to a control device and will be turned off by midnight.
When is the location open for prospective clients and walk throughs: By
appointment only. That would be during 9:00 AM to dark Monday through
Sunday.
Please address received comment letters that discuss noise and lighting. Please
see above.
How the issues will be mitigated: Lights and speakers off by midnight.
Guests Park and stay within the designated area.
Business Operations: Same as above.
Note:
Any drinking water or food will be provided by outside vendors.
Swimming pool is fenced off and not part of the venue.
Hours / Days of Operation: Typical hours of operation are 5 PM until 10:30 PM.
This is an outdoor seasonal event venue, in operation primarily October
through April.
Number of Employees: One part-time employee as needed for cleaning.

Description /location of buildings: The building is a historic, made from native
rock and cement. Location of Buildings: Buildings are located at the North End of
the Property.
Color Pallett: Colors of the desert. The color palette of the buildings blends in
with the surroundings as the buildings are made from natural stone from the
area. Color of the buildings are earth tones. Colors include brown, reddish
brown, light reddish brown, gray, dark brown and light gray. The roof is a red
color.
Type of Construction Material: It is made from native rock and cement and
wood frame.

Sign Detail: Sign detail: Illuminated at front entry.
Screening Wall: There is Approximately 5-foot wall in the front of the property.
Fence details and location. The wall in the front is made of stucco
and is painted tan. The wall is approximately 5 feet high in most parts and
located on the south side of the property next to New River Road.

Around the house itself is a variety of plants and trees for privacy.
Ocotillo located on the Wrangler’s Roost in front of the house.

The front yard area looking towards the mountains
D. Relationship to Surrounding Properties (Their use
Zoning)
Surrounding proprieties include vacant land, agricultural land, residential and
commercial. The zoning is R43. The property is in the county of Maricopa.

How the proposed development will benefit the community or area. Wranglers
roost has attracted international attention and visitors.
The property will bring more customers and cash to the area when rented. The
people leasing the property will need to eat, buy supplies and buy gas etc.
The restaurants and stores in the area should benefit. The sales tax that the
clients pay for food, gas and supplies should benefit the
community.
To the East of Wranglers Roost is the Century Link Building and Three Bars Feed
Store.
To the West of Wranglers Roost are various commercial properties including two
different commercial four-wheeler rentals. restaurants and more.
Wrangler’s Roost emphasizes the beauty of the desert and maintains the property
and the historical buildings for the community to enjoy when they come to the
property.
The community is ever growing and Wrangler’s Roost adds to the beauty and
value of the community.
Just down the road is an entertainment venue called the Road Runner. They have
Rodeos and live bands. The Road Runner has been there for years.
The Wrangler’s Roost was one of the first structures in New River
New River is named after the seasonal wash of the same name, part of
the Agua Fria River system which drains into the Salt River. The
community was founded by Lord Darrel Duppa in 1868 as a stagecoach
stop. For many years it was the terminus of the old Black Canyon Highway
(now Interstate 17). The pavement ended in New River and continued as a
dirt road to the city of Prescott.[5]
The front gate of the historic Wranglers Roost located 2500 West New
River Road in New River; Arizona was where the New River stage coach
stop was located in the late 1800’s.

The Wranglers Roost Stagecoach Stop - This was a New River
Stagecoach Stop which was established in 1890. Pictured within the
property is the main building.
Below is a poster of a movie made at Wrangler’s Roost and
beside that poster is a photo of the old entrance gate.
•
Wranglers Roost Stagecoach Stop is located in New River, Maricopa
County, Arizona. It was a stagecoach stop for a time in the late 1800s. In
1931, Carl Jesse Myers (called himself Chief Myers) built WR in the 1930s
as a dude ranch. The dude ranch was successful all through the 1930s
when times were tough.
Lord Darrell Duppa 1868 who owned the Wrangler’s
Roost in New River. Above was from Wikipedia”

Wranglers Roost Stagecoach Stop - Wikipedia
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org
As you can see Wrangler’s Roost has been at the heart of New River since the
beginning of New River. The property has been used as a resort. The owners
who want to preserve its beauty and historic value to be shared with others.
Wrangles Roost is one of the oldest wedding venues in Arizona listed on the
National Register of Historic Places.

The historical use of Wranglers Roost began long before Maricopa County had
any permitting requirements. It has been used as a venue and gathering place
for nearly 100 years. The permitting history goes back to the early 60’s with
many approved permits for special uses at Wranglers Roost.
Discussion of Recent Changes in the area of your request that support
the application request: Recently there has been a new truck stop built
on New River Road and I 17 to support tourist and the community.
The Wrangler’s Roost has in fact always been a guest ranch and
restaurant.
The property has a tradition of sharing and introducing the desert to
people and that should be preserved. Wranglers Roost always tells
guest about other things to do in the area and promotes the commerce
in the area that adds to the tax base.
E. Location and Accessibility
Wrangler’s Roost is located on New River Road, a main arterial road
leading to I 17 going south to Anthem, Phoenix and the airport and on
the I 10 to California. Going north on I17 it will take you to Flagstaff.
There is plenty of parking and a private entrance gate.
You do not have to go through any neighborhood roads to get there.
Because Wrangler’s Roost is on New River Road there is no dust and
no congestion.
The HOA maintains the road and access easement.
F. Circulation System
No proposed Developments.
G. Development Schedule
1 year build, ADA Compliance. Everything else is already existing.
H. Community Facilities and Service
There are many community facilities and services in the area.
Kiwanis Park is off of 15th Ave off of New River Road. The address is 48606 North
17th Ave, New River, Arizona 85087.
Kiwanis Park supplies a community center, a horse arena, a public trail as well as
rest rooms and a park for picnicking and children playing.
I. Public Utilities and Services

School District is New River Elementary School.
Deere Valley Unified School District
Daisey Mountain Fire Station on New River Road
Police is Maricopa Sheriff’s department
Several refuse companies service the area such as Curbside and Waste
Management.
APS services the electric.
Direct TV and Dish are among others that service TV and internet.
Most people in area such as Wrangler’s Roost have their own private wells,
however in the area there are many water haulers.
Most homes have their own septic system.
J. For RUPD – Comparison Chart
Not necessary.
K. Other information
Please see photos of the landscaping of the area.
Please see photos of the architecture.
SIZE:
1 + ACRES
OWNER Or AUTHORIZED AGENT:
Imagine Properties, LLC
2500 W. New River Road
New River, Arizona. 85087
Mailing Address:
Reid Stewart
2500 W New River Road
New River, Arizona. 85087
Contact Person:
Reid Stewart
602-561-0111
No Fax but address is 2500 W New River Road, New River,
Arizona. 85087
reidgstewart@yahoo.com

Project Name: Wranglers Roost 2500 W New River Road, New River, AZ. 85087
General Location: North of New River Road, New River, Arizona 85087
APN: 202-29-088D. NORTH ↑
Not To Scale. Vicinity Map
An application has been filed with Maricopa County Department of Planning and
Development regarding the request above. As required by the Maricopa County
Zoning Ordinance, this notice is being sent to you because property listed in your
name is located within 300 feet of the site noted above. This notice is being sent
to you to inform you of this application and to provide you with an opportunity to

relay any questions, issues or concerns regarding this application to the contact
person listed in the top box of this page.
Wranglers Roost introduces people to the desert.
t
A. Parties affected by Application
PROPERTIES WITHIN 300 FEET OF SAID PROPERTY 202-29-088D
202-29-088E
Reid Stewart
2500 W New River Road
New River, Arizona 85087
202-29-087B
Carefree Nursery
2500 W. New River Road
New River, AZ 85087
202-29-087A
Carefree Nursery
2500 W. New River Road
New River, Arizona 85087

202-29-087C
Carefree Nursery
2500 W. New River Road
New River, Arizona 85087
202-29-086
Siobud LLC
2500 W New River Road
New River, Arizona 85087
202-29-085C
Carefree Nursery
2500 W New River Road
New River Road, New River Road 85087
202-29-088C
Carefree Nursery
2500 W New River Road
New River Road, New River Road 85087
209-29-085B
Brenan Stewart
2542 W. New River Road
New River, Arizona 85087
202-10-993
Rosalia LLC
2500 W New River Road
New River, AZ. 85087
202-10-994
Qwest Corporation
2428 W. New River Road
New River, Arizona 85087
202-29-024D
Betsy A Kelly

48411 N. 27th Ave
Phoenix, Arizona 85027
202-29-024C
Jerome Runner
48415 N 27th Ave
New River, Arizona
Reid Stewart and Heidi Stewart: Their home is next to property on the
west.
Jeff Stewart and Jill Stewart: Their home is West of property on hill.
All adjacent properties are in favor of this proposal.
No public agencies will be affected.
B. Notification and Information Procedures
All interested and affected parties will be notified by mail and notified by
the sign posted.
C. Response Procedures
Interested Parties that may wish to express concerns will have the proposal
in advance of the public hearing. The proposal will be given to all adjacent
neighbors.
D. Schedule for completion
One year.
E. Status Procedure
How the owner will keep the planning Department informed on the status
of their citizen participation efforts.
The owner will send out emails to the planning department of the status of
citizen participation.
7. Drainage Report
The house was built nearly 100 years ago.
Submitted.
8. Traffic Impact Study
Traffic Study is included.
9. Market Study

This venue for Weddings is needed in this area. It brings tax money and
commerce to the area. This provides a service that promotes the area and
brings the beauty of the desert to the people coming to the Wrangler’s
Roost.
Other Information
A. Title Report – Will get if necessary
B. Deed Restrictions – HOA - supports Venue
C. Parcel Maps – Included
D. Letters of Support _ Will get to you when needed.
E. Market Study – Needed and High Demand in this growing area.
G. Building Elevations (including material, color and treatment descriptions)
F - Landscape Plans
Plant types:
Bushes Include Trianle0-laf Bursage
Brittle Bush
Creosote Bush
Cat Claw
Cactus Include:
Saguaro Cactus
Barrel Cactus
Prickly pear Cactus
Century Plant
Jumping Cholla
Chain Fruit Cactus
Soap-tree Yucca
Crimson Hedgehog Cactus
Pashycereus Schotti Cactus
Agave
Totem Pole Cactus
Trees:
Palo Verde
Desert Ironwood
Velvet Mesquite
Palm tree
Landscaping is already in place with mature plants.
Palm Trees
Landscaping of Natural Desert covers 75.66 per cent of the property

Pool and fountain.
Lot coverage:
Existing Landscaping 75.66% - 32,924.0 SQUARE FEET
Parking 12.37% - 6,015.0 SQUARE FEET
Total Area Under Roof 11.97 % - 5,816.0 SQUARE FEET
100.00% 48,607.0 SQUARE FEET
Building height and square footage. Building is 10 feet tall and the square
footage of the main house is 3857 square feet with an additional 109
square feet for the small building to the west and 893 square feet of
porches.
Parking areas
Dimensions and angles-See map Total 6,015 SQUARE FEET includes ADA
access path.
Surfacing or pathing material- Small Granite
Vehicle Storage Areas - None
Loading spaces or zones identified – You can unload at the back. It notes
that any loading or unloading shall be completed before and after Events
in parking space 26 or 25 or spaces 2 and 3 as needed, otherwise the
spaces will be used as event parking.
Required and Proposed parking spaces – shown on ma
Site Plan
1. Project name and Tracking number:
Wrangler’s Roost Rentals LLC
2. Date of Plan:
March 15th, 2017
3. Vicinity map with location of site. See Vicinity Map.
4. The owner of the Parcel #202-29-088D is:
Image Properties LLC, Reid G Stewart, Member.
5. Site Dimensions and boundaries are on the map.
6. North Arrow is on the map.
7. Summary:
Existing zoning and land use RU43
Property Rental
8. Request SUP for Wranglers Roost Rentals LLC
9. Legal Description of parent parcel and SUP area:
The APN number is 202-29-088D.

The address is 2500 W. New River Road, New River, Arizona 85087.
10. Street name to the access is New River Road.
11. Access Points
12. Dimensions of all driveway widths and distances between driveways.
13. Each use identified:
Dimensions of each structure
Dimensions between structures
Distances from property lines
Lot coverage:
Landscaping 67.91% - 32,924.01SQUARE FEET
Parking 19.83% - 9640.58 SQUARE FEET
Total Building area 12.26 % - 5963.39 SQUARE FEET.
100% 48,607 SQUARE FEET
Building height and square footage. Building is approximately 10 feet
tall and the square footage is 3,766.
14. Parking areas
Dimensions and angles-See map Total 6,000 SQUARE FEET
Surfacing or pathing material- Small Granite
Vehicle Storage Areas - None
Loading spaces or zones identified – You can unload at the Side
Identified on site plan.
Required and Proposed parking spaces – shown on map.
15. Adjacent Property owners, uses, zoning and parcel numbers.
Show on map.
16. Name of School District is New River Elementary School and Deer
Valley High School.
17. Utility Table
Electric – APS
Trash – Curbside and Waste Management
Water – A private well serves the site and will remain. Drinking water
and beverages will be catered. The site is able to use hauled water.
With the number of events being limited to less than 60 days per year
(serving 25+ persons), and the fact that there are not 15 water
connections to the well, the need for a Public Water System is not
required.
Wastewater - A private septic system serves the site and will remain.

Disposal of wastewater goes into said private septic system. The
current septic system that will be located within the new proposed SUP
boundary has one 1,250-gal tank This will accommodate 595 gallon per
day for estimated design flow (1250/2.1 = 595 gpd).
Per a septic analysis provided by Shawn Whitmer, Professional Engineer
with AdvANTAGE Consulting Services (4248 E. Rainbow Drive, Gilbert,
Arizona 85297), the following septic capacity calculations apply to an
event center of this type:
• Total attendees = 100 Total Parking Spaces = 28
Dance hall flow factor = 100 people x 5 gal/day per person = 500
gal/day
or
Park (temporary Use Picnic flush toilets only) = 20-gal x parking space
Therefore: 20-gal x 29 parking spaces = 580 gal/day use higher
amount
Design Flow = 580 gal/day
Minimum Septic Tank Size = Design Flow x 2.1 factor = 580 gal/day x
2.1 = 1,218 gallons
In conclusion: Existing system has sufficient capacity for the event
center.
Crystal Creek water, Dynamite Water and others.
Wastewater disposal goes into the private septic system
Fire Protection: Daisey Mountain Fire Department on New River Road
Natural Gas: Southwest Gas
Telephone is Century Link, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and more.
Police Protection: Maricopa County
The property will have an ADA Bathroom with a pool house. There are
Easy paths to the bathroom as shown on the site plan. This will make
the property compliant for guests to easily have the ADA Bathroom.



See New Drainage Report Sent:




Planning & Development
Engineering Plan Review
Date: March 5, 2025
Jeri Loucks, PECFM
Planning & Development
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning &
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Development
Phone: (602) 506-6332
www.maricopa.gov/planning
Email address: Attn: Andrew Lorentzen, Planner, Planning & Development Services
jeri.loucks@maricopa.gov
From: Jeri Loucks, P.E.C.F.M., Engineering Supervisor, Planning &
Development Services
cc: Bob Fedorka, P.E., Engineering Manager, Planning & Development
Subject: SU240007 – Special Use Permit (SUP)
(E3 Memo)
Job Site Address: 2504 W NEW RIVER RD NEW RIVER, AZ 85087
APN(s): 202-29-088D
PND Engineering Plan Review (DPR, FCD and PND Transportation) has reviewed the
3rd submittal of the application routed for review on February 12,2025 and has no
objections subject to the following stipulations:
1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and
Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway
Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices
at the time of application for construction.
2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes
to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design required
for permitting of the site’s drainage infrastructure.
3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted
with the application for Building Permits. The plans must be in accordance with
the Commercial Checklist. See link:
https://apps.pnd.maricopa.gov/plansubmittalchecklist
4. The above comments do not include identification of utilities or underground
facilities within or adjacent to the required right-of-way that may have prior
rights and/or require relocation.
Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
5. Prior to the Building Permit Approval, the Drainage Access and Maintenance
Easement must be recorded and the recordation information added to the
plans.
6. Prior to the Building Permit Approval for site improvement, the entire Special
Use Permit (SUP) area must be identified and the area must physically drain
to the Retention Basin. The Drainage Area Map must accurately show what
area drains to the Retention Basin. The contributing area must be updated to
include the proposed parcel boundary adjustment area and other areas of the
SUP.
Please contact me with any questions.

Water and Waste Management Division
Subdivision
Infrastructure
& Planning Program Project Name: Wrangler's Roost Event's Primary Contact Name: Jo Long
301 W. Jefferson St. Facility
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planning Application Type: Special Use APN(s): 202-29-088D
Subdi vi sio n@mari co pa.go v Permit
esd.mar i co pa.go v
Reviewer: Ryan Hall, P.E. Planner Name: Andrew Lorentzen
Email: Ryan.Hall@maricopa.gov Planning Case #: SU240007
Phone: 602-918-1241 Date: August 23, 2024
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has completed review
for the Wrangler's Roost Event's Facility planning case(s). Please note the following MCESD
requirements for site development:
Drinking Water –
Per the Safe Drinking Water Act, any water system that supplies more than 25 people or 15
service connections per day for at least 60 days per year is classified as a Public Water
System (PWS).
• If the above criteria is met, a Public Water System application and a New Source
Approval application are required and must be submitted to the MCESD’s Drinking
Water Program. A water quality analysis report will be required with submittal and is
good within one-year of testing.
An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the MCESD’s Treatment
Program for all water treatment facilities.
• For questions, please contact the Water/Wastewater Treatment Program at (602)
372-2861 or email treatmentplantprogram@maricopa.gov
An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the MCESD’s
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for all water system infrastructure.
• For questions, please contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure Program at (602)
506-1058 or email subdivision@maricopa.gov
For additional Drinking Water related questions, please contact the Drinking Water program
at (602) 506-6935 or by email at sdwquestions@maricopa.gov.
Page | 1

Onsite Wastewater –
A Minor Plan Review application must be submitted for any existing system(s) if being
utilized and if the applicant believes the existing system(s) are adequate in size to support
the new use; otherwise, a new septic permit/install may be required.
A Notice of Intent to Discharge application for an onsite wastewater treatment (septic)
system is required for any construction. Application must be submitted to the MCESD
Onsite Wastewater Program.
• Wastewater is not permitted to discharge to an adjacent parcel’s septic system.
• Setback requirements must be maintained per Arizona Administrative Code, Title
18, Chapter 9, Article 312, C (Features Requiring Setbacks).
For Onsite Wastewater related questions, please contact the Onsite Program at (602) 506-
6666 or by email at septicquestions@maricopa.gov.
Pool –
Operating permits are required for public and semi-public pools, wading pools or special use
pools, spas and artificial bathing lakes. Operating permits are not required for private
residential pools and spas. Where required, submit an application to MCESD Aquatic Health
and Safety Program for a public swimming pool.
Additional information for public swimming pools can be found on the MCESD Aquatic
Health and Safety webpage.
Additional Notes –
*It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project. Comments are provided
for the benefit of the applicant for MCESD permit requirements and as an advisory to Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department. Other Maricopa County agencies may have additional
requirements. Final review and approval will be made through Planning and Development Department
procedures. Applicant may need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental
Services Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department. Review of any such
application will be based on current regulations at the time of application.
Page | 2


Appendix A

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Kathleen Skogen <kdskogen@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 12:21 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007. Wrangler's Roost
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Hello Sir,
I would like my email to be included in the public comments for the SUP for Wrangler’s Roost. I have lived
in New River for a combined total of 22 years. I have taught at New River school, volunteered with many
events in our community, and enjoy most every part of the living out here.
One of my neighbors hates everything about Wrangler”s Roost! He is doing everything in his power to shut
this establishment down. He sent letters to many neighbors around the area, but did not send one to me as he
knew how I supported this business! That’s not fair and it’s sneaky! Send the letter to all involved or none.
Wrangler’s Roost has been around for many, many years! I took my older kiddos for a tour and hot lunch there
many years ago. Now with our two youngest kiddos we listen to the fun wedding music on the weekends. Or
shall I say used to , as this neighbor has a cease and desist order against Wrangler’s Roost. The music is fun,
wedding music ,celebrating a wonderful time in a couple’s lives. The music is usually only on a Friday or
Saturday evening and is always off by 10:00 PM. Maybe a couple of times, it went until midnight , but that’s
rare.
This neighbor is not used to our way of life out here in New River, tries to change things that have been done
around here for generations, he installed gates on his property so the delivery drivers can’t turn around on his
property, wants to pave our dirt road, and complains about the previous owner of his property who was a great
older gentleman.
Wrangler’s Roost holds much history, has historical buildings and used to be a Pony Express stop!
Please allow Wrangler’s Roost to host events again with a SUP, with stipulations, as the music needs to be off
by 10:00 or 11:00pm. No foul language on a microphone, limit the attendance to whatever the fire Marshall
agree’s to.
We all need to work together in this tough world to help each other out and not be so against each other!!
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Kathleen Skogen
48012 N. 27th Ave.
New River, AZ 85087
623-695-3445
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Richard Glauser <glauserred7@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2024 11:47 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Reference number: SU240007
Name: Richard Glauser and family
Address: 2546 W Roughrider Rd
Comment: We approve of the special use permit for Wranglers Roost. We believe it keeps the rich history of the area
alive.
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Clara Shaffer <personaltouch.2411@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 10:43 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Wrangler's Roost
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
I am writing in response to a letter received from Marko Dapcevich regarding the above referenced business.
We are residents of New River and live slightly to the E of Wrangler's Roost on the opposite side of the Road ‐ 23rd
Dr. We have owned property for about 6 to 8 years now, and built our home about 2 years ago.
Part of our attraction to New River was its authenticity and rustic charm, including Wrangler's Roost. We have never
met the Stewarts, but we share their vision of protecting and maintaining the minimal amounts of history that still
exists‐‐and being able to share it with the public.
Although I understand the Stewart's have neglected to pay some expenses on their place, which I understand, and
agree, is not acceptable. It would be nice if there were some small amount of funds or tax breaks available to them
to help maintain and protect this historic location for future generations to explore and learn about. I have reached out
to Mr. Stewart and suggested having some type of open house and/or fundraiser to help either annually or maybe even
monthly. I am not sure this is legal under his license, but I think it would help.
In any event, I feel this place has been here far longer than any of the property owners around or near to them, and was
here when most, or maybe all, bought their land or homes. As such, it should be grandfathered in (so to speak) and
people should be happy to help keep it alive as a historical site.
If my vote counts, I vote to grant them their required license and let them continue their business ‐ since they were here
first ‐ and it was not a secret what they do. There are other places around here that are far worse, but again, those
places have been here for many many years too, and we all chose to accept them when we purchased our property.
PS ‐ although people do prefer a dark sky, having lights on 2 ‐ 3 days per week for an event, is not a big deal ‐ and should
be understandable as otherwise their place is dark and a bit hard to find.
Thank you. Please feel free to reach out to me if need be. I can be reached at 602‐399‐2411.
Respectfully,
Clara Shaffer
1


Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Reid Stewart <reidgstewart@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 4:49 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Neighbor text message
Andrew, ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart this is a screenshot of a text message with the owner of parcel 202–29–024C. The address is 48415 N. 27th Ave. He told me he supports SU240007. Thanks Reid
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside
the county.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End
Andrew, this is a screenshot of a text message with the owner of parcel 202–29–024C. The address
is 48415 N. 27th Ave. He told me he supports SU240007.
Thanks
Reid
1

2

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Wranglers Roost <wranglersroost1@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2025 9:02 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Approve SU240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Dear Mr. Lorenzen
I am a member of Carefree nursery LLC. Parcel Number 202-29-088C is vested in the LLC and it joins the
SUP parcel. Of course we are all in favor of the SUP.
Sincerely,
Heidi Fletcher Stewart
member
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Wranglers Roost <wranglersroost1@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2025 8:55 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Approve SU240007
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
To Mr Lorenzen,
I Live at 2528 West New River Rd. Parcel number 202-29-085C. It joins the SUP parcel. Of course we are all in favor of
the SUP.
Sincerely,
Heidi Fletcher Stewart
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Jeff Stewart <jestew@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 5:01 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: Reid Stewart
Subject: SU240007
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Hello Andrew
We own the property at 48403 N 27th Ave (parcel 202-29-023C) and are in favor of granting the special
use for SU24007.
Jeff Stewart
Cell - (602) 535-6700
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Jeff Stewart <jestew@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 4:59 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: Reid Stewart
Subject: Approve SU240007
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Hello Mr Lorentzen
I own the home at 48451 N 27th Ave. New River. We are in favor of granting the special use.
Jeff Stewart
Cell - (602) 535-6700
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Jill Stewart <jilldstewart@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 4:59 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: Heidi
Subject: Approve SU240007
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Hello
I live at 48407 N 27th Ave. New River and I received your postcard. I approve the special use at
Wranglers Roost.
--
Jill Stewart
435-770-6355
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Jill Stewart <jeff.jill.stewart@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 4:59 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: Reidgstewart@yahoo.com
Subject: Approve SU240007
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
We own the property at 2605 W Ute, New River, AZ and are in favor of the special use permit for
Wranglers Roost.
Jeff Stewart
1


Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Shaylie Taylor <shaytay102@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 9:46 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Case #SU240007
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Hello Andrew,
I wanted to express my hope for approval of the SUP SU240007. I used to live at Wranglers Roost and still
visit by on a regular basis. Me and my five children love the place.
Thank you,
Shaylie Taylor
602-622-6230
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Barbara <azcasablanca@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 9:12 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Re: SU240007 – Wranglers Roost - External Routing
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Mr. Lorentzen:
If it helps, I am a nearby resident to this property, within a mile. I personally love to see social activities at
this property. Reid and the Stewart family are respectful of surrounding neighbors. I fully support their
intention to rent the property for gatherings or social events. My family has visited this property and
enjoyed the historic nature of Wranglers Roost ever since I was a small child (1963 to today). It makes
me very happy to see it in capable hands and being preserved for future generations.
Any use permit sought by Mr. Stewart has my full support and approval.
Barbara White
602-920-6022
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 10:56 AM Andrew Lorentzen (PND) <Andrew.Lorentzen@maricopa.gov> wrote:
Hello Registered Area of Interest Member,
Please find attached a planning & development application routing for SU240007 – Wranglers Roost .
See attached document for instructions to download application materials.
Thank you,
Andrew Lorentzen
Planner
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
301 W. Jefferson St. Suite 170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
1

O: 602-506-2364
MARICOPA.GOV
Andrew.lorentzen@maricopa.gov
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
2




Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Janette Duran <jlavenderlilly@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2026 10:44 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: Church Heidi Stewart
Subject: Application # SU240007 APN 20229088D & 20229088E
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Dear Mr Lorentzen:
I have been a resident of New River since 1976. I have attended many events at Wranglers Roost over the
years between different owners. Wranglers Roost is a unique and endearing landmark that has been
open to the public for a variety of events over the years. This community has benefitted from this historic
site and will continue to benefit under the stewardship of Reid & Heidi Stewart. I know the Stewart's to be
good, conscientious and community minded people. They are courteous and mindful of their immediate
neighbors and have personally opened their doors to assist local non-profits on several occasions. This
venue could not be in better hands. Please approve this request and keep the Wranglers Roost
experience alive!
Sincerely,
Janette Langley Duran
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: htfowlerazsky@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2026 10:49 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: In favor of request #SU240007 Wrangler’s Roost special use permit
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Dear Mr. Lorentzen,
I am writing to ask that you approve the special use permit (case #SU240007) to allow Wrangler’s Roost
to operate as a wedding and special event venue.
This historic property has a rich heritage of serving our community over the past 200 years. It has been a
stage coach stop, a hotel housing travelers and the teacher for the local one room schoolhouse, a dude
ranch, and an event venue. Personally, as a kid growing up in the ‘70’s in the subdivision just north of
Wrangler’s Roost, I remember getting to swim in the pool during the off season.
There is unique value in having a local, historic property meaningful to so many in our community that is
available to host events.
My family celebrated both my husband’s 50th birthday party and my son’s wedding at Wrangler’s
Roost. The property is perfect for Western themed events, is local, family owned, accessible, and
friendly.
It would be a great service to our community to keep Wrangler’s Roost operating as a wedding and
special event venue.
Please approve the special use permit to allow Wrangler’s Roost to continue serving the people of our
community.
Thank you,
Heather Fowler, DVM
810 W. Circle Mountain Rd.
New River, AZ. 85087
1

To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing in strong support of granting a Special Use Permit for Wrangler's Roost.
I have personally visited the property on multiple occasions and have witnessed firsthand the
extraordinary transformation of what was once an abandoned and dilapidated structure into a
beautiful and historically respectful venue. The owners have invested significant resources,
labor, and vision into preserving and restoring this property, thereby reclaiming an important
piece of local history that might otherwise have been lost.
In addition to visiting the property, my own son and daughter-in-law held their wedding at
Wrangler's Roost. The event was marvelous in every respect. The venue provided a beautiful
setting for a cherished family occasion, and our experience demonstrated the care and
professionalism with which the property is operated. Our family will always have treasured
memories associated with that special day.
The restoration of Wrangler's Roost has not only preserved a historic property but has also
enhanced the surrounding area. Rather than allowing a deteriorating structure to remain an
eyesore, the owners have improved the appearance and value of the neighborhood while
creating a venue that serves families and the community.
I understand that some neighbors have raised concerns regarding noise from occasional
wedding events. I believe those concerns deserve respectful consideration. However, it is my
understanding that the owner has demonstrated a willingness to be a good neighbor by
agreeing to lower music volumes and shorten the hours during which amplified music is
played. Such accommodations reflect a sincere effort to balance the needs of neighboring
residents with the operation of the venue.
No property use is entirely without impact. The question is whether the overall benefits
outweigh the occasional inconveniences. In my opinion, they clearly do. Wrangler's Roost
represents exactly the kind of private investment, historic preservation, and community
enhancement that local governments should encourage.
I respectfully urge the County to grant the requested Special Use Permit and allow Wrangler's
Roost to continue operating under reasonable conditions that preserve both neighborhood
peace and the many benefits this venue provides.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
John W. Lundberg
Permanent Maricopa County resident, Arizona

June 19, 2026
RE: Wrangles Roost – Letter of support New River 85087
Permit Number SU240007
To: Mr. Andrew Lorentze
Andrew.lorentzen@maricopa.gov
Please accept this letter of reference in support of Reid and Heidi Stewart, the owners of
Wranglers Roost- one of the most impressive historical properties in central Arizona.
As a neighbor, I can attest that the various activities hosted at Wrangler Roost, including
weddings, corporate events, graduation parties and dances, have never infringed upon my
privacy or peace. The property is managed with utmost respect for the surrounding
neighborhood.
Wranglers Roost is a tremendous asset to the New River area. It holds an exceptional
reputation, drives vital tax revenue into our local economy and provides job opportunities
for members of our community.
Furthermore, I can personally vouch for the Stewarts. They are pillars of our community,
and I deeply respect the responsible and professional manner in which they operate their
business.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact
me at 480-7866-9135
Sincerely,
Mike Walker
50514 N. 26th Drive
New River, AZ 85087
mikewalkeraz@gmail.com

Preston Moody & Asia Moody
47840 N 31st Ave
New River, AZ 85087
June 20, 2026
Andrew Lorentzen
Re: Letter of Support for SU240007
Dear Mr. Lorentzen,
We are writing to express our support for SU240007. As residents at 47840 N 31st Ave, New
River, AZ 85087, we are in favor of this request moving forward.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information
regarding our support.
Sincerely,
Preston Moody
Asia Moody


Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: jeri and tyler Ledford <ledfords@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2026 9:35 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND); Reidgstewart@yahoo.com
Subject: Wranglers roost SU 240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
To whom it may concern at Maricopa County,
My name is Tyler Ledford and my family of 6 are permanent residents here in New River. We live at 3433
W New River Rd, New River AZ 85087 near the Roadrunner Saloon. West New River Rd is also a high
traffic area that is the only access for residents to access our town from the north side, so with that
comes constant traffic noise. At least 2 nights a week we also can hear very loud music and
announcements from the roadrunner. I feel that these are necessary parts for our community and local
business which we understand and support because we love living here. We are also in favor of special
use permit 240007 for the Wranglers Roost area. We love that such an important part of New Rivers
history is being preserved and can be shared and accessed by visitors who want that experience of old
west times in our modern day. We have never heard any noise or had any complaints from Wranglers
Roost and stand in full support of their part in our community.
Thanks for your time and considerstion,
Tyler Ledford
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Tracy Justus <tracy@justusranch.com>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 3:44 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: Reid Stewart
Subject: SUV Application 240007
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Hello Mr. Lorentzen,
We are neighbors of Reid and Heidi Stewart, who are in the processes of applying for a special use
variance (SUV) for their property at 2504 W New River Road in New River Arizona. My wife and I have
resided on the property next door at 2305 W New River Rd since 2017. The Stewarts have been
exemplary neighbors over this past decade. Their property in questions, known as Wranglers Roost, is a
historic site with buildings dating from the 1800s. If it were not for the Stewarts, it is likely we would have
lost this history because they have preserved them and love sharing them with the community. My wife
and I have attended several events where they have opened their property for community gatherings. If
there were any cause for complaint, we would be the first to know since our property overlooks
Wranglers Roost.
It would be a loss to the community to bar Wranglers Roost from social gatherings. Having known the
Stewarts over the past decade, I can testify that they are honest people with a love for their community.
They love to serve those in need and are often the first to step up. Please consider our testimony when
weighing your decision for this variance.
Respectfully,
Emma and Tracy Justus
2368 W New River Road
New River, AZ 85087
480-773-2225
1



Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Bill Thomson <bthomson_9@myctl.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2026 12:26 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: reidgstewart@yahoo.com
Subject: Wranglers Roost (Case # SU2400070
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
I am writing to express support for the request for a Special Use Permit for Wrangler's Roost. Although I
now live about 4 miles from Wrangler's Roost, for 37 years I lived on Rough Rider Road which is
immediately north of Wrangler's Roost. I also have attended a number of events there. As both an area
resident and an event attendee, I never have had a problem with noise, lighting, traffic, unruly attendees,
etc. The size and type of events generally held there do not create a disturbance. Rather, I feel the facility
is an asset to the New River and Desert Hills area. There is not another venue in the area where friends
and neighbors from the area can gather together to celebrate special events. Prizing as we do the country
lifestyle, it is a great to have the opportunity to have these events in our area.
William Thomson
44313 N. 1st Drive
New River, AZ 85087
1

Appendix B

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Dustin Butler <dbutler@mail.bradley.edu>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2024 2:41 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Hi Mr. Lorentzen, my name is Dustin Butler and I live at 2545 W Sunset Dr in New River. I am writing regarding the
special use permit that Reid Stewart is pursuing for the Wrangler's Roost. I hope that this permit is denied. Reid has
shown little regard for his neighbors and I am sure that if permitted, he will continue to make Saturday nights miserable
for everyone around him. It has been very peaceful since he has been ordered to stop.
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Russ Gevarter <rgevarter@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 5:58 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Hello Andrew,
Please add my comment about Wranglers Roost.
Their events are way too noisy. I do not want them to be granted any SU permits.
Thank you.
Russell Gevarter
48048 N 23rd Ave
New River AZ 85087
Sent from my iPhone
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Marko Dapcevich <markodap@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 4:09 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Mr. Lorentzen,
I am sorry it took so long to provide this to you. It turns out it was a little more complicated than I had
anticipated. You may recall I rescinded my previous comment in regards to the Wranglers Roost SUP
240007. Below is the comment I wish to replace it with. Please confirm that you have received this and
that the previous comment is replaced with this. Thank you.
I am writing today to express my opposition to special use application 240007 filed by Roan Construction
for the Wranglers Roost at 2500 New River Road in New River.
The location for this proposed event venue is very rural and low Density. In New River there are no
streetlights. There are only two lane roads and the maximum speed limit is 45 miles per hour. There are
more dirt roads than paved. It is low density, very quiet, and dark. Saguaro cactus outnumber people.
Events are by nature loud, late and bright affairs. With them come lots of people, traffic, DJ’s, bands,
cheering, etc. That activity does not fit in with the characteristics of New River and its rural zoning. There
are no businesses even remotely similar to this in the rural zoning of New River.
Businesses in the rural zoning of New river consist of a feed and tack store, some nurseries, and animal
related businesses.
People live in New River for the quiet, dark skies, and wonderful views that the RU43 zoning allows them.
A business that generates traffic, noise, and lights is not conducive to this area and does not belong
here. A very commercial business like an event venue belongs in commercial zoning, not a rural one.
Another concern, if an SUP like this is granted, is the lack of protection provided by Maricopa County.
The County has not addressed the relevant concerns of the neighbors going back nearly a decade. In
that time PND has not enforced their orders to comply as well as their cease and desist order. MCSO
has not enforced the dark skies provisions of the zoning code even though they are mandated to do so.
Finally, MCAO has refused to prosecute any nuisance or the P23 noise ordinance.
It would be unfair for the County to allow an event venue when the area residents would have no hope of
the County monitoring, regulating, or enforcing the code or any conditions placed on the SUP.
1

Please do not allow for a very commercial use that does not belong in a very rural area. An event venue is
not an appropriate use for this area.
--
Marko Dapcevich
Mayor Emeritus
503-956-6240
2

Appropriateness:
This proposal is not a good fit for a rural area. Event venues result in noise, lights, and traffic.
This is not a good fit regardless of the time or day.
This request is not for a small cottage industry. There would be large events held outside.
Zoning laws exist for a reason. Quoting the zoning code, “The principal purpose of this zoning
(RU-43) is to conserve and protect farms and other open land uses, foster orderly growth in rural
and agricultural areas, prevent urban and agricultural land use conflicts…” This use is a
direct conflict. If someone wants a commercial business they should buy commercial property.
In a 1.5 mile radius there are no similar business. There is a handful of cottage businesses. The
most commercial operation is a church.
There is no unmet need for an event venue in New River. There are 7 within a 20 minute drive.
It’s also unfair to the venues that are on appropriately zoned commercial property.
The proposed times of operation conflict with the time residents would choose to enjoy evenings
outdoors.
A precedent should not be set. We have already seen similar venues in the area operating without
a SUP and don’t need to open the door for numerous such enterprises.
An event venue in the area will have an impact on property values and other uses like an airbnb.
Enforcement:
For 10 years Maricopa County did not enforce their ordinances, orders, and agreements. Even
though required to enforce the zoning code MCSO flatly refused to do so. In March of 2022
MCSO Captain Brandimart issued an order NOT to enforce. For equally long P&D did not
enforce their orders. P&D did not enforce its Cease and Desist for three years. The results were
the same from the Assessors office, Board of Supervisors, Ombudsman, and County Manager.
This SUP should not be approved without a monitoring and enforcement mechanism in place.
The SUP should include verbiage that the SUP Shall be revoked if conditions are not meant.
Due Dilligence:
If the county does wish to consider recommending this SUP some due diligence is needed. This
would include:
• A review of the notification process. The CPP says the level of citizen interest and area
involvement will vary depending on the nature of the application and the location of the
site. The target area for early notification will be determined through a coordinated effort
of the owner or authorized agent and staff. In this case that only included the minimum.
As staff noted in their report these are all family and associates of the applicant. Staff
was aware from police reports and public comment that people heard the activities of the
WR from a mile or more away yet chose to allow for notification only 300 feet from the
property even after agreeing that the notification area should be expanded. I believe staff
erred by only allowing the minimum. It has been nearly two years since this application
was filed. New houses have been built, houses have been bought and sold and tenancy

has rotated. If this board is considering approving this SUP then notice should be
expanded, redone and insured it is correct.
• Staff noted “the violation history and public comment that has been received indicate a
level of carelessness for existing ordinances and regulations such as noise and light
ordinances”. The county should confirm that any orders, directives, agreements,
stipulations, and directives are currently being complied with before a recommendation to
move forward is considered.
Conditions:
If this board chooses to move forward with an approval recommendation further consideration
should be given to the conditions staff recommends.
• Days of operation should not include Sunday. Sunday is a work/school night and should
be treated like any other work/school night.
• Hours of operation should not allow until 10:PM. It’s a rural area and people tend to be
in bed before 10:PM. 8:PM would be more appropriate.
• If the recommendations stand as written it would allow for lights at a height of 35 feet.
Limit of height of lights should be included.
• The five-year stipulation should be reduced. This is not an inconvenience to the
applicant as long as he follows the conditions. It would provide additional comfort to the
residence if he does not.
• The conditions reference the noise ordinance. MCSO refused to enforce that for five
years. When they did submit for charges MCAO refused to prosecute. One year later
MCSO submitted for charges again. MCAO waited almost a year to file charges and
then, on May 6 2024 MCAO moved to dismiss based on it being a flawed ordinance. I
have addressed the BOS and they have refused to revise the ordinance. The citizens of
New River have no protection from P-23. The county needs some sort of enforcement
mechanism besides P-23.
• Wording should be changed from “may” to “shall”. Noncompliance with any conditions
shall result in revocation.
• Staff proposes a limit to 65 decibels off property. According to Yale University 60-65
decibels is the sound of a normal conversation. Imagine trying to have a normal
conversation over a conversation level noise in your own yard. A suburban area at night
is 40 decibels. 65 decibels is 2.5 times louder. Of course RU-43 is rural, even quieter. 50
decibels would be more appropriate.
• Staff recommends that one employee must posted at the new river road entrance. The
requirement should require also visible from new river road. A liaison should be visible.
Conclusion:
The county has a responsibility to the entire community. The county needs to look at the greater
good and weigh the pros and cons to all parties involved. Lastly, preference should be given to
the people who are living in the area because they enjoy the quite, peaceful, dark evenings. This
is why people live here. A SUP should not be issued. But if it is the county needs to confirm that
all conditions of the SUP are met and the properties are in compliance with all current county
orders, agreements, and regulations. If a commercial enterprise is placed in a rural district it
should have to adapt to the rural nature as opposed to the residents adapting to the commercial
nature of the business. Anything different is patently unfair to the people and lifestyle of the
residents.

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: genahr@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2024 9:08 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
As a homeowner near the Wrangler Roost property, I am not supportive of the permit to allow for
venues. This will create traffic, drinking and increase potential risks of accidents for the 27th Ave/New
River intersection. This unwanted noise is disruptive to a quiet, rural neighborhood. Additionally, it will
add trash in the surrounding areas and have concerns as to how they will manage the clean ups of
large events.
In my observation, from reading the articles on the violations and in observing him build homes in the
neighborhood there is a lack of consideration and respect for neighbors and are not mindful of county
regulations during the building process.
We pay property taxes, comply with regulations and take pride in maintaining our homes and investment.
Respectfully,
Gena Fisher
2527 W. Country Road
New River AZ
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Mary Ann Bushard <mabushard@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 9:45 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc: Marko Dapcevich
Subject: Wrangler's Roost/Reid Stewart - Application for Special Use Permit - SU240007.
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Good morning Mr. Lorentzen,
I have been advised that Reid Stewart and/or Wrangler's Roost has applied for a Special Use Permit to use the property
on New River Road as a wedding and event venue.
My address is 48162 N 23rd Ave, New River, AZ 85087. My property is approximately 1,000 feet from Wrangler's Roost
and I have lived here for 25 years.
For years, starting perhaps in 2014, Wrangler's Roost has been used as a wedding and special event venue. Consistently,
the music has been so loud that with my doors and windows closed, I can hear the music during the events, often well
up until midnight. The music is so loud that the western wall of my house sounds like someone is pounding against it.
At one point, in perhaps 2019, several neighbors met with Reid to discuss the problem to see if we could reach an
amicable agreement. Nothing came from that meeting.
Many of the neighbors have called MCSO for years because of the loud noise and have contacted Reid about it. He has
consistently lied about the use ‐ even under oath at a hearing held before Maricopa County Planning and Zoning in July
2021, which I attended and was also attended by my neighbor, Marko Dapcevich.
At a hearing this spring, the neighborhood became aware that the Maricopa County noise ordinance is so poorly written
that it does not apply to people 1,000 or more feet away from the source of the noise. Imagine what Reid will do if
given free rein to have his paid guests blast their music as loud as they want, now realizing he is unfettered by the
poorly‐written ordinance.
For the sake of maintaining a quiet neighborhood, one which allows homeowners the quiet enjoyment of their property,
I am requesting that you deny the Special Use Permit. We live in a rural area; bought our homes because of the quiet,
and many of us commuted miles to our work because when we came home, we wanted a peaceful environment. If we
wanted to listen to someone else's music, we would have bought next to the Roadrunner.
Please contact me if you have any questions or want further information.
Sincerely,
Mary Ann Bushard
48162 N. 23rd Avenue
1

New River, AZ 85087
602/574‐1680
2

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: martin.lantry@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 8:19 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Wranglers Roost Special Use Permit.
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Hi Andrew,
New River, AZ. A wonderful rural community just minutes removed from the big
city. New River is a place where families come for the country environment and the
opportunity to raise children in a very wholesome environment. Horse properties,
Ranches, and residential homes are all interspersed in the community, as it has been
for decades. New River is a peaceful community, where the neighbors are friendly,
helpful, and responsible.
The Stewart clan presents a very different picture. We put up with the noise, and the
drunkenness, for a while, apparently the Stewarts have an Alcoholic Beverage
license. The last thing any neighborhood needs is more drunk drivers on the road as
they leave the parties happening on the Stewart property. One evening, our family
was at home, enjoying a movie together, when we started hearing vulgar four-letter
words being loudly, and proudly, broadcast by the latest Stewart party. I went outside,
and saw that there were over one hundred people, yelling along with the
‘musicians’. The noise and vulgarity were overwhelming.
I found a phone number for the property and called them. To my surprise, Mrs.
Stewart answered the phone. It turns out that she was just as appalled as I
was. However, Mr. Stewart did nothing, the onslaught continued. After waiting for an
hour, I called the Sheriff.
The responding Deputy shut the party down, then drove to our property to advise us of
the results. The Deputy informed us that he had to deal with many drunken individuals
and a very upset property owner, Mr. Stewart.
The next morning, I received a text from Mr. Stewart, he informed me that he had
spoken with one of our neighbors and had managed to smooth over the situation. He
went further to say that ‘at least the neighbor had the courage to talk to him’. I realized
then that he had absolutely no interest in becoming a part of this community.
1

As has been documented, the parties have continued for years. The Sheriff has had
varying degrees of effectiveness in dealing with the situation. The Stewarts have
apparently racked up Thousands of dollars in fines and legal fees, and still, they are
thumbing their noses at our community.
Before you grant permission to the Stewarts to continue to assault this community,
please try to envision the following.
Imagine that the Stewarts opened an event venue in the Anthem business district. Do
you think the Anthem Community Council would put up with the noise, vulgarities, and
drunkenness? Anthem would shut them down after one night, as they should.
Why would anyone think that any community should be subject to the Stewart’s fantasy
of building an event venue in the heart of a wonderful residential community?
Thank You,
Martin Lantry
48018 N 27th Ave.
New River, 85087
2

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: p e <pdeast@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 9:24 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SUP240007 Wranglers Roost/Reid Stewart
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Dear Andrew Lorentzen,
We are writing to you to please not issue a Special Use Permit to Reid Stewart at Wranglers Roost for any reason,
especially for hosting weddings or other events that have loud music and a loudspeaker blasting every word they are
saying.
We have been putting up with this loud music and loud disc jockey with the microphone turned up to the max for many
years. We even had a neighborhood meeting with Mr. Reid to ask him to please turn down the music. He did not.
We have been calling the sheriff on every occasion to get them to stop. They did not stop. We could not sit out on our
patio and have and enjoy our evening because it was so loud, we had to go inside and close the doors and windows. And
the vibration of the music continued to be felt in our home.
This is a community that surrounds Wranglers Roost. A large number of people are experiencing discomfort or negative
impacts due to the loud music and loudspeaker. You can't enjoy an evening on a weekend because you can't carry on a
conversation with your guests.
Mr. Reid has been getting away with this problem for years. The sheriff goes over and asks them to turn it down. But
most of the time when they leave the music gets turned back up. His property is not zoned for a business like this. This is
a residential area. Not an area to disturb everyone who lives around Wranglers Roost.
It is time to end this very real problem. We have all enjoyed the peace and quiet.
Thank you,
Peggy and David East
2308 W. Wolftrap Road
New River, AZ 85087
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: James Kane <seamusmcshank@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 2:24 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Mr. Lorentzen,
I live on 24th Lane adjacent to the Wranglers Roost property and wish
to give my input on case SU240007 and the SUP for Reid Stewart's event
venue. Over the past five years I have seen a great increase in
traffic on New River Road and the additional traffic for his venue has
caused unnecessary safety issues. The noise has been a bother to our
peaceful area, and all the bright outdoor strung lights are many times
left on for days or weeks. Golf balls from Wranglers Roost sometime
appear on our easement. I would prefer if the activities no longer
happen.
My neighbors have filed complaints concerning his unapproved filling
in of the solid rock washes next to our easement. He buried broken
drywall, old furniture and demolition debris, was cited by Maricopa
Enviromental Dept. but has continued with such activity anyway. Look
up the records.
From my experience I believe Mr. Stewart will continue with his
activities despite any cease order from the county. Good luck.
James Kane
48507 N 24th Lane
New River
480-387-8039
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Melissa Turnbow <melissa.turnbow16@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 6:58 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Hello Mr Lorentzen,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the Special Use Permit application submitted by Mr. Stewart. As a
resident of 2436 W. Wolftrap Rd in New River, I oppose granting this permit.
One of the main reasons I chose to live in New River was for its peaceful environment. Unfortunately, Mr. Stewart has
already demonstrated that he is not considerate of his neighbors when it comes to noise levels. Given the way sound
travels in our area, I fear that approving this permit would significantly disrupt the quiet atmosphere that many of us
value.
I respectfully request that you take these concerns into account and deny Mr. Stewart's application for a Special Use
Permit.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely, Melissa Turnbow
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: rmason1@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2024 5:46 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Mr. Lorentzen,
I've lived a mile away from Wrangler's Roost for over 10 years. I can easily hear the music during
their large event venues. It is a distraction from our normal quiet evenings.
More concerning is that Mr. Stewart has owned 2 lots in our neighborhood since we moved in. He
has shown a disregard for the by-laws of our community and has refused to participate in the costs of
shared wells and road maintenance. From his past history it seems like he feels above the law and
will tend to act only in his own self interest.
Rob Mason
2520 W. Country Road
New River, AZ 85087
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Karyn Vanderlip <karyn833@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2024 5:03 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SUP SU240007
Attachments: 20241025_165633.jpg; 20241025_165535.jpg
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Dear Mr Lorentzen,
My name is Karyn Vanderlip and I am a resident of New River, Arizona where I own a house. I am writing to voice my concern
about the Wrangler's Roost requesting a Special Use Permit SU240007 to host weddings and events. In the past, when they were
operating, the noise from the events was unbearable. Even though my property is well beyond the 1,000 feet source of noise, the DJ
and music could be heard outside and inside my home with the doors and windows closed until 11pm or 12 midnight. On these nights
it was difficult to sleep with the sounds of the music and bass thumping, the DJ announcements and party noise (yells and
whooping). We moved out to this rural community to enjoy the dark and peaceful nights, and with this type of business operating,
that will disappear. We have had a lot of new neighbors who have moved up here since his operation was shut down, and they have
no idea that this was a problem.
I am also including two pictures of the SUP notice posted on the outside wall of their property. This is very deceiving as it is difficult
to see. Even though I drive past the property every day I was unaware of it. I had to drive by a couple of times to find it after my
neighbor alerted me to it. Generally people drive 55mph or more on New River Rd and will never notice the sign or it's importance.
Therefore, I do not think the community surrounding his property ( and beyond) will be aware of his plans to host events. If this SUP
is granted there will be many surprised people. This business does not belong in a rural, residential neighborhood, where sound
travels miles and miles, and we will be condemned to listen to his DJ's, music and parties every weekend. Please feel free to contact
me if you need any more details or information.
Thank you for your consideration,
Karyn Vanderlip
48040 N 23rd Ave
New River, AZ 85087
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: Scot Welch <swelch117@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 9:08 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Dear Mr. Lorentzen,
This has been my experience. The music is too loud and they play it way too late, and when you ask them
to be considerate they do nothing. I vote NO.
Scot Welch
48040 N 23rd Ave
New River, AZ 85087
SU240007
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: LaPolla Gery <gery_l@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 9:34 PM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: SU240007. Wranglers Roost Event Venues
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Andrew,
This correspondence is in reference to the Wranglers Roost Special Use Permit, SUP application.
My property is adjacent to the Wrangler Roost Property. The events that have been held there have not created any
problems or issues, nor have they generated any noise concerns.
Wranglers Roost is an important part of our small community.
I am in full support and in full agreement for the approval of the SUP applications, so that these events can be
continued.
Thank you
Gerald LaPolla
2515 W. Rough Rider Rd
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
1

Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From: cindy hedge <Cindy.Hedge@outlook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 9:54 AM
To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject: Reference: SU240007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders.
Always validate the sender first.
Dear Mr. Lorentzen,
Honestly, I think this is so uncalled for. I live off of 27th Ave & New River Road. There is only noise on the
weekends (Friday and Saturday). Wrangler Roost only plays music until 10:00 PM. Let the guy make a
living. It's nice to sit on my patio and listen to the music and happy people.
If you want to discuss noise I can hear the Roadrunner Bar & Grill from my home as well. If you are going
to go after the Wrangler Roost then you need to check out the noise from the Roadrunner as well.
Wrangler Roost is bringing business to New River and I am sure his taxes help out our community as well.
Let Mr. Stewart, makes a living doing something he enjoys. This is not a business that runs every night or
even every weekend. The people who are complaining need to put themselves in Mr. Stewart position
and how would they feel about the community trying to shut their business doors.
Let him stay open and make a living just like the rest of us who work out here.
Sincerely,
Cindy Hedge
1