032513IBEDITED.DOC

Informal & Special Joint Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013 Board Members
10:00 AM Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3
Denny Barney, Vice Chairman, District 1
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Steve Chucri, District 2
Maricopa County, Arizona Clint Hickman, District 4
(and the Boards of Directors of the Flood Control District, Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5
Library District, Stadium District, Improvement Districts,
Housing Authority of Maricopa County and/or Board of
Deposit) County Manager
Tom Manos
Clerk of the Board
"The mission of Maricopa County is to Fran McCarroll
provide regional leadership and fiscally
responsible, necessary public services
to its residents so they can enjoy living Meeting Location
in healthy and safe communities.” Supervisors' Conference Room
301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
The Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in Informal Session at 10:00
AM on Monday, March 25, 2013, in the Supervisors' Conference Room, 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor,
Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3; Denny
Barney, District 1; Steve Chucri, District 2; Clint Hickman, District 4; Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5. Also
present: Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board; Shirley Million, Minutes Coordinator; Tom Manos, County
Manager; and David Benton, Legal Counsel.
PRESENTATION AND ACTION
County Manager
1. ENHANCED REGULATORY OUTREACH PROGRAM - POLICY REVISIONS
Presentation regarding proposed revisions to the Enhanced Regulatory Outreach Program Policy.
At the conclusion of the presentation, adopt the revised Enhanced Regulatory Outreach Program
Policy. (C-44-13-088-M-00)
Joy Rich, Deputy County Manager
Joy Rich explained that in January a program was started on the new interactive
regulatory website to promote an improved dialogue with all stakeholders when
regulatory changes are made by Maricopa County. A stakeholder group that includes
representatives from the industries that do business with the County has been formed. It
includes membership from various groups, such as general contractors, homebuilder’s
associations, environmental experts, and the attorneys representing those groups.
Stakeholders have identified some additional improvements, and policy change
discussions remain open and active. Two public meetings may be held before a matter is
presented to the Board.
One revision to the policy identifies the specific departments covered by this policy as Air
Quality, Environmental Services, MCDOT, Planning and Development and the Flood
Control District.

Informal & Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013
Page 2 of 10
Ms. Rich noted that proposed Definitions should be kept to a minimum and need to focus
on Code Ordinance Regulations and Substantive Policy Statements. A flow chart was
created to provide an expedited process for use when an item has no opposition. Ms.
Rich said they are striving to maintain total compliance because it is expected that other
counties will also adopt this program or use it as a model.
Supervisor Wilcox asked how much the lack of opposition could expedite a rule moving
through the process.
Ms. Rich replied that timing would vary depending on how often the particular board
meets, e.g., monthly or quarterly. She explained that adoption could also be expedited
through “Incorporation by Reference,” which is primarily used for Air Quality issues. This
can be needed if there is an incorporation date change, or a federal rule or statute
change that states must adopt. She said in those instances the timing could be
extremely expedited.
She informed the Board that the regulatory website is being well-used and the public
seems to be giving insights and suggestions freely. She said the improvement process is
on-going and quarterly reports would be given to update the Board.
Supervisor Chucri congratulated Ms. Rich on the dual track she described, saying it
aligns with his goal of making government better.
Steve Trussel, Executive Director, Arizona Rock Products, expressed appreciation of the
hard work done and thanked Ms. Rich, Tom Manos and staff for accomplishing so much
in a short time period. He said it is a good model for other counties to follow.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Wilcox, seconded by Supervisor Barney
Ayes: Kunasek, Barney, Chucri, Hickman, Wilcox
PRESENTATION
Public Health
2. PRESENTATION ON THE TOBACCO AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION PROGRAM
Update on the Tobacco and Chronic Disease Prevention Program formerly Tobacco Use
Prevention Program. (C-86-13-072-P-00)
Dr. Bob England, Public Health Director
Dr. Robert England reported that tobacco is still the leading cause of preventable death
and is responsible for one in every five deaths in the U.S. He stated that more than 10%
of smoking-related deaths are due to second-hand smoke exposure. The smoking rate
average in Maricopa County is 17.3% compared to the state average of 19.2% and the
national average of 21.2%. In Arizona one in five young adults, or 20.4% of those ages
18-24, use tobacco, mostly in cigarettes.
Most of the funding for government anti-smoking programs comes from the state’s
Tobacco Tax. The Arizona Department of Health Services receives only 12 cents from the
state’s $2 per pack tax on cigarettes. The lost productivity nationally of smokers in the
workplace costs non-smokers approximately $7.22 per pack in related health care issues,
and this is on a fast-rise to $8 per pack in some states.
In 2008 the U. S. Health Department redirected its efforts from prevention towards a policy
and systems’ change, directing staff to include other chronic diseases to their former
tobacco-only efforts and to return excess money to the states to promote better state-wide
media and marketing efforts. At that time, 18 positions in his department were eliminated.
Dr. England explained that this has paid-off over time.
In 2007-08, the year of the voter initiative for a Smoke-Free Arizona, all public
establishments had to be smoke free and smokers had to go outside to smoke One in

Informal & Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013
Page 3 of 10
Board of Supervisors’ Chairman Kunasek welcomed the Flood Control District Board of Directors
and the Flood Control District Advisory Board members to this Joint Session.
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
AND THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ADVISORY BOARD
The Board of Directors of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in
Joint Informal Session at 10:00 AM on Monday, March 25, 2013, in the Supervisors' Conference Room,
301 W. Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman,
District 3; Denny Barney, District 1; Steve Chucri, District 2; Max Wilson, Clint Hickman, District 4; Mary
Rose Wilcox, District 5. Also present: Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board; Shirley Million, Minutes
Coordinator; Tom Manos, County Manager; and David Benton, Legal Counsel.
Tim Phillips and members of the Flood Control District Advisory Board of Directors also came to the dais
for the joint meeting with the Board of Supervisors for the following items. Tim Phillips reported that the
current members of the FCD Advisory Board were: Melvin Martin, District 5, Chairman; Hemant Patel,
District 3, Vice Chairman; Dallas Tanner, District 2, Secretary; Scott Ward, District 1; DeWayne Justice,
District 4; and ex-officio members Ray Dovalina, City of Phoenix and Robert Larchick, Salt River Project
(all but Mr. Martin and Mr. Larchick were present). Vice Chairman Patel called the Advisory Board to
order.
PRESENTATION
F-1 PRESENTATIONS REGARDING THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BUDGET OVERVIEW
AND OPERATIONS
1) FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FY2013-14 BUDGET OVERVIEW
Presentation regarding the proposed FY2013-14 budget for the Flood Control District of
Maricopa County. (C-69-13-035-P-00)
2) FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS
Overview of the Flood Control District operations.
Tim Phillips Flood Control Chief Engineer/General Manager
Christopher Fazio, Finance Manager
Tim Phillips said that Phoenix and the Salt River Valley could not have developed as
they have without some means to control the devastation caused by flooding during the
yearly monsoon season. The Flood Control District was founded in 1959 with a Class 5
Community Rating System (CRS). This rating measures the ability to keep people safe
when flooding occurs. The District currently is rated as Class 4. Lower ratings can
decrease the cost of flood insurance for residents living in unincorporated Maricopa
County by 30%. He added that there are only three organizations nationally that have a
CRS rating that is lower than the County’s.
Mr. Phillips explained that people can build homes in a floodplain, but the problem is how
to build safely so they are not impacted by seasonal flooding. Four programs have been
developed to help reduce the risk of injury, death and property damage due to storm
water flooding events:

Informal & Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013
Page 4 of 10
Outreach
Flood Hazard Identification
Flood Hazard Regulation
Flood Hazard Remediation.
One goal of the Outreach program is to help educate people on the dangers of driving
around barricades and into flooded washes. Water in the flooded areas may be 3-4 feet
deep and deaths have occurred. The County had to first identify areas where flash flood
hazards from storm waters occurred, and then determine the probable extent of the
hazard. The death toll from this has been significantly reduced in recent years. Mr.
Phillips said the program is considered a success but there is no way to determine how
many people actually “turned around” because of it. The District hopes that the Outreach
Program has helped more people become aware of the “Stupid Motorist Law” that was
passed by the State Legislature in 1995. The goal was to make those getting stuck in
flooded areas through their own bad decisions pay the costs of any emergency rescue
response.
Maricopa County has 6,000 linear miles of washes that need floodplain delineation. The
Flood Control District has gained much experience in flood hazard mitigation and has a
local, state and national reputation for expertise in flood control.
Remediation proficiency has been gleaned through construction and operation of more
than 140 channels, basins and storm drains and the operation of 22 dams that are
maintained and managed to current Dam Safety Standards. Mr. Phillips noted that there
is aging infrastructure to deal with now and the older structures are being rebuilt and
updated to hopefully maintain them for another 40-50 years. He said the identification,
floodplain delineation and infrastructure have been predominate to the urban core. Urban
development has been moving quickly and it is easier and less expensive to install
infrastructure prior to that development.
Mr. Phillips spoke of the District’s Alert System that receives signals from more than 300
gauges, weather stations and stream and inundation gauges throughout and outside of
the County. This tool allows the District to know what is happening in rivers and washes
during rain storms and gives a heads-up on what could happen. He said the actual data
coming into the District is also being released to the public on the District’s website.
Detailed daily weather reports are also sent to subscribers. These give extensive
information on heat and weather conditions currently and for the near future.
He reported that the Flood Control District’s four programs probably makes it one of the
best full-service, flood hazard mitigation agencies in the country. He said, “We don’t just
build, we don’t just educate, we don’t just identify, but we really do all of those parts as
well as regulate.” Representatives of the District have been visiting each of their 25
community partners to refresh the affiliation with organizations and to assure them of the
services the District provides as their Regional Flood Control entity.
Mr. Phillips noted that challenges to the District include funding, declining assessed
values, aging infrastructure, aging workforce and public engagement. Funding and
budget requests for 2013 and 2014 were pushed down from the highs received in 2011
and 2012. Regardless, Mr. Phillips said the real challenges for the District are in
prevention.
The District plans to strengthen its role as the regional leader in flood control and
floodplain management and to expand its multi-objective watershed approach to flood
mitigation. One goal is to preserve and restore the natural resources and functions of
floodplains and riparian areas in the County. The “plan” is for all Maricopa County

Informal & Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013
Page 5 of 10
residents and visitors to be protected from the devastating effects of regional flooding by
the year 2020.
Director Wilcox thanked the District’s Advisory Board Members for the many projects
they have undertaken and completed satisfactorily. She said these benefit residents and
open-up areas for many uses including recreation.
Chairman Kunasek thanked the members of the District’s Board for volunteering so
much of their time in service to the County and in developing and pioneering the many
projects that were completed over the years.
Christopher Fazio reported on the FY 2014 Flood Control District Budget submission of
$62 million, saying that, as usual, property tax revenue comprises the largest portion.
The FY 2014 revenue is unchanged from FY 2013; however, it is $20 million below the
peak property tax revenue of several years ago.
The additional, large revenue source for the District is the Capital Project IGA Revenue,
which largely represents federal and local cost share for capital projects. The District’s
accumulated fund balance is another financial consideration of revenue and it had two
large, one-time revenue sources totaling $45 million over the past several years: a $24
million land sale in Gilbert and a condemnation settlement of $21 million with ADOT on
the Spook Hill Dam. These accumulated monies assisted in building a fund balance that
allowed the FCD to largely defer some of the cutbacks that would otherwise have been
required from declining property tax revenues.
The Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) budgets for FY 2013 and 2014 both have $10
million deductions for each year; and the Operating and Grants Budget decreases an
approximate $2 million for those years. Mr. Fazio explained that the District’s budget is
broken into three funds; the Operating Fund, the Capital Project Fund and a Grant Fund.
The total 2014 Expenditure Budget is $62 million, a 15% reduction from FY 2013. These
cuts will impact all of the four strategic programs of the District.
Director Wilcox asked if cutting $10 million each year will stretch the funding too far. Mr.
Fazio replied that reducing the CIP will reduce it from where it would have been several
years ago, from $60 million to $40 million. He added that no projects have been cut but
some will be delayed.
Chairman Kunasek asked how much of the $12 million for the 2014 Loop-303
construction project comes from the County and how much from ADOT. Mr. Fazio
replied that the $12 million is the County’s share. The project was geographically divided
and he believed ADOT is funding about 80% of the total construction.
Director Wilcox said that Maricopa County is the regional leader and asked the FCD
Board Members to alert the District’s Board of Directors if the CIP is endangered by a
reduction that is too large.
Director Hickman asked Tim Phillips about replacement of the older workforce and
training a younger replacement workforce, feeling that Maricopa County could lose a
wealth of knowledge.
Mr. Phillips replied that libraries of records are maintained in different departments so the
next generation will have valuable information available. He added that the replacement
of staff is not happening so quickly that training and smooth transitions cannot be made.
He acknowledged that it is important to recognize that there will be a time in the future
when the younger generation transitioning in will assume the general overall

Informal & Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013
Page 6 of 10
responsibilities.
Chairman Kunasek thanked Director Wilcox for suggesting these joint meetings with
other County Boards. He also thanked the FCD Board Members for recognizing the
constraints placed on the Board of Supervisors and the county budget as a whole by the
weak economy.
The Chairman of the Flood Control District Advisory Board adjourned the
Advisory Board at this time.
Chairman Kunasek recessed the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Directors of the Flood
Control District remained in session to consider items on its March 25, 2013 Informal agenda
Chairman Kunasek reconvened the Board of Supervisors.
3. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Vote to convene in Executive Session to consider items on the Executive Agenda dated March
25, 2013, for Board of Supervisors and relevant Special Districts pursuant to statutory authority
listed for each item.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Wilcox, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Kunasek, Barney, Chucri, Hickman, Wilcox
MEETING ADJOURNED
Following discussion on Board of Supervisor Executive Agenda items, and there being no further
business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.
__________________________________
Andrew Kunasek, Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
______________________________
Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board

Informal & Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013
Page 7 of 10
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
AND THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ADVISORY BOARD
The Board of Directors of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in a
Joint Informal Session at 10:00 AM on Monday, March 25, 2013, in the Supervisors' Conference Room, 301
W. Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District
3; Denny Barney, District 1; Steve Chucri, District 2; Max Wilson, Clint Hickman, District 4; Mary Rose
Wilcox, District 5. Also present: Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board; Shirley Million, Minutes Coordinator;
Tom Manos, County Manager; and David Benton, Legal Counsel.
The Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in Joint Informal Session at
10:00 AM on Monday, March 25, 2013, in the Supervisors' Conference Room, 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor,
Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Andrew Kunasek, Chairman, District 3; Denny
Barney, District 1; Steve Chucri, District 2; Clint Hickman, District 4; Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5. Also
present: Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board; Shirley Million, Minutes Coordinator; Tom Manos, County
Manager; and David Benton, Legal Counsel.
Chairman Kunasek invited Tim Phillips and members of the Flood Control District Advisory Board of
Directors to join the Board of Supervisors at the dais for the following items. Tim Phillips reported that the
current members of the FCD Advisory Board were: Melvin Martin, District 5, Chairman; Hemant Patel,
District 3, Vice Chairman; Dallas Tanner, District 2, Secretary; Scott Ward, District 1; DeWayne Justice,
District 4; and ex-officio members Ray Dovalina, City of Phoenix and Robert Larchick, Salt River Project
(all but Mr. Martin and Mr. Larchick were present). Vice Chairman Patel called the Advisory Board to
order.
PRESENTATION
F-1 PRESENTATIONS REGARDING THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BUDGET OVERVIEW AND
OPERATIONS
1) FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FY2013-14 BUDGET OVERVIEW
Presentation regarding the proposed FY2013-14 budget for the Flood Control District of
Maricopa County. (C-69-13-035-P-00)
2) FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS
Overview of the Flood Control District operations.
Tim Phillips Flood Control Chief Engineer/General Manager
Christopher Fazio, Finance Manager
Tim Phillips said that Phoenix and the Salt River Valley could not have developed as
they have without some means to control the devastation caused by flooding during the
yearly monsoon season. The Flood Control District was founded in 1959 with a Class 5
Community Rating System (CRS). This rating measures the ability to keep people safe
when flooding occurs. The District currently is rated as Class 4. Lower ratings can
decrease the cost of flood insurance for residents living in unincorporated Maricopa
County by 30%. He added that there are only three organizations nationally that have a
CRS rating that is lower than the County’s.

Informal & Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013
Page 8 of 10
Mr. Phillips explained that people can build homes in a floodplain, but the problem is how
to build safely so they are not impacted by seasonal flooding. Four programs have been
developed to help reduce the risk of injury, death and property damage due to storm
water flooding events:
Outreach
Flood Hazard Identification
Flood Hazard Regulation
Flood Hazard Remediation.
One goal of the Outreach program is to help educate people on the dangers of driving
around barricades and into flooded washes. Water in the flooded areas may be 3-4 feet
deep and deaths have occurred. The County had to first identify areas where flash flood
hazards from storm waters occurred, and then determine the probable extent of the
hazard. The death toll from this has been significantly reduced in recent years. Mr.
Phillips said the program is considered a success but there is no way to determine how
many people actually “turned around” because of it. The District hopes that the Outreach
Program has helped more people become aware of the “Stupid Motorist Law” that was
passed by the State Legislature in 1995. The goal was to make those getting stuck in
flooded areas through their own bad decisions pay the costs of any emergency rescue
response.
Maricopa County has 6,000 linear miles of washes that need floodplain delineation. The
Flood Control District has gained much experience in flood hazard mitigation and has a
local, state and national reputation for expertise in flood control.
Remediation proficiency has been gleaned through construction and operation of more
than 140 channels, basins and storm drains and the operation of 22 dams that are
maintained and managed to current Dam Safety Standards. Mr. Phillips noted that there
is aging infrastructure to deal with now and the older structures are being rebuilt and
updated to hopefully maintain them for another 40-50 years. He said the identification,
floodplain delineation and infrastructure have been predominate to the urban core. Urban
development has been moving quickly and it is easier and less expensive to install
infrastructure prior to that development.
Mr. Phillips spoke of the District’s Alert System that receives signals from more than 300
gauges, weather stations and stream and inundation gauges throughout and outside of
the County. This tool allows the District to know what is happening in rivers and washes
during rain storms and gives a heads-up on what could happen. He said the actual data
coming into the District is also being released to the public on the District’s website.
Detailed daily weather reports are also sent to subscribers. These give extensive
information on heat and weather conditions currently and for the near future.
He reported that the Flood Control District’s four programs probably makes it one of the
best full-service, flood hazard mitigation agencies in the country. He said, “We don’t just
build, we don’t just educate, we don’t just identify, but we really do all of those parts as
well as regulate.” Representatives of the District have been visiting each of their 25
community partners to refresh the affiliation with organizations and to assure them of the
services the District provides as their Regional Flood Control entity.
Mr. Phillips noted that challenges to the District include funding, declining assessed
values, aging infrastructure, aging workforce and public engagement. Funding and
budget requests for 2013 and 2014 were pushed down from the highs received in 2011
and 2012. Regardless, Mr. Phillips said the real challenges for the District are in
prevention.

Informal & Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013
Page 9 of 10
The District plans to strengthen its role as the regional leader in flood control and
floodplain management and to expand its multi-objective watershed approach to flood
mitigation. One goal is to preserve and restore the natural resources and functions of
floodplains and riparian areas in the County. The “plan” is for all Maricopa County
residents and visitors to be protected from the devastating effects of regional flooding by
the year 2020.
Director Wilcox thanked the District’s Advisory Board Members for the many projects
they have undertaken and completed satisfactorily. She said these benefit residents and
open-up areas for many uses including recreation.
Chairman Kunasek thanked the members of the District’s Board for volunteering so
much of their time in service to the County and in developing and pioneering the many
projects that were completed over the years.
Christopher Fazio reported on the FY 2014 Flood Control District Budget submission of
$62 million, saying that, as usual, property tax revenue comprises the largest portion.
The FY 2014 revenue is unchanged from FY 2013; however, it is $20 million below the
peak property tax revenue of several years ago.
The additional, large revenue source for the District is the Capital Project IGA Revenue,
which largely represents federal and local cost share for capital projects. The District’s
accumulated fund balance is another financial consideration of revenue and it had two
large, one-time revenue sources totaling $45 million over the past several years: a $24
million land sale in Gilbert and a condemnation settlement of $21 million with ADOT on
the Spook Hill Dam. These accumulated monies assisted in building a fund balance that
allowed the FCD to largely defer some of the cutbacks that would otherwise have been
required from declining property tax revenues.
The Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) budgets for FY 2013 and 2014 both have $10
million deductions for each year; and the Operating and Grants Budget decreases an
approximate $2 million for those years. Mr. Fazio explained that the District’s budget is
broken into three funds; the Operating Fund, the Capital Project Fund and a Grant Fund.
The total 2014 Expenditure Budget is $62 million, a 15% reduction from FY 2013. These
cuts will impact all of the four strategic programs of the District.
Director Wilcox asked if cutting $10 million each year will stretch the funding too far. Mr.
Fazio replied that reducing the CIP will reduce it from where it would have been several
years ago, from $60 million to $40 million. He added that no projects have been cut but
some will be delayed.
Chairman Kunasek asked how much of the $12 million for the 2014 Loop-303
construction project comes from the County and how much from ADOT. Mr. Fazio
replied that the $12 million is the County’s share. The project was geographically divided
and he believed ADOT is funding about 80% of the total construction.
Director Wilcox said that Maricopa County is the regional leader and asked the FCD
Board Members to alert the District’s Board of Directors if the CIP is endangered by a
reduction that is too large.
Director Hickman asked Tim Phillips about replacement of the older workforce and
training a younger replacement workforce, feeling that Maricopa County could lose a
wealth of knowledge.

Informal & Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, March 25, 2013
Page 10 of 10
Mr. Phillips replied that libraries of records are maintained in different departments so the
next generation will have valuable information available. He added that the replacement
of staff is not happening so quickly that training and smooth transitions cannot be made.
He acknowledged that it is important to recognize that there will be a time in the future
when the younger generation transitioning in will assume the general overall
responsibilities.
Chairman Kunasek thanked Director Wilcox for suggesting these joint meetings with
other County Boards. He also thanked the FCD Board Members for recognizing the
constraints placed on the Board of Supervisors and the county budget as a whole by the
weak economy.
The Chairman of the Flood Control District Advisory Board adjourned the meeting
at this time.
Chairman Kunasek recessed the Board of Supervisors.
PRESENTATION AND ACTION
F-2. ENHANCED REGULATORY OUTREACH PROGRAM - POLICY REVISIONS
Presentation regarding proposed revisions to the Enhanced Regulatory Outreach Program Policy
(reference agenda C-44-13-088-M-01). Adopt the revised Enhanced Regulatory Outreach
Program Policy.
Joy Rich, Deputy County Manager (C-69-13-020-6-01)
Chairman Kunasek said these revisions were discussed earlier during the Board of
Supervisors portion of the meeting and explained that the same amended policy needs to be
adopted by the Flood Control District.
Motion to approve by Director Wilcox, seconded by Director Chucri
Ayes: Kunasek, Barney, Chucri, Hickman, Wilcox
F-3 Vote to convene in Executive Session to consider items on the Flood Control District Executive
Agenda dated March 25, 2013, pursuant to statutory authority listed for each item.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Wilcox, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Kunasek, Barney, Chucri, Hickman, Wilcox
MEETING ADJOURNED
Following discussion on Flood Control Executive Agenda items, and there being no further business to
come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.
__________________________________
Andrew Kunasek, Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
____________________________
Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board