022620FB.DOC

Board Members
Clint Hickman, Chairman, District 4
Jack Sellers, Vice Chairman, District 1
Bill Gates, District 3
Steve Chucri, District 2
Steve Gallardo, District 5
County Manager
Joy Rich
"The mission of Maricopa County is to Clerk of the Board
provide regional leadership and fiscally Fran McCarroll
responsible, necessary public services to
Meeting Location
its residents so they can enjoy living in
Supervisors' Auditorium
healthy and safe communities” 205 W. Jefferson
Phoenix, AZ 85003
FORMAL MEETING
MINUTES
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Maricopa County, Arizona
(and the Boards of Directors of the Flood Control District, Library District,
Stadium District, Improvement Districts and/or Board of Deposit)
Table of Contents
Board Page
Board of Supervisors 1
Improvement District No Meeting
Flood Control District 49
Library District 50
Stadium District No Meeting
Board of Deposit No Meeting
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
9:30 AM

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 2 of 50
Supervisor Chucri introduced Meghan Frost noting she is the Assistant Vice President
of Creighton University Health Sciences Phoenix. He spoke of the great working
relationship the County has with Creighton Medical School and noting its presence as a
compliment to the County services.
1. INVOCATION – INVOCACIÓN
Invocation was offered by Meghan Frost, Assistant Vice President of Creighton
University Health Sciences Phoenix.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - JURO FIDELIDAD A LA BANDERA
Ms. Frost led the assemblage in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
3. ROLL CALL – LISTA
The Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in Formal Session at
9:30 AM on Wednesday, February 26, 2020, in the Supervisors' Auditorium, 205 W. Jefferson,
Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Clint Hickman, Chairman, District 4; Jack
Sellers, Vice Chairman, District 1; Steve Chucri, District 2; Bill Gates, District 3; Steve Gallardo,
District 5. Also present: Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board; Maria Ceaglske, Minutes Coordinator;
Joy Rich, County Manager; and Andrea Cummings, Legal Counsel.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - JUNTA DE SUPERVISORES
4. PET SHOWCASE BY MARICOPA COUNTY ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL
PRESENTACIÓN DE ANIMALS DOMESTICOS POR EL DEPARTAMENTO DE
CONTROL Y CUIDADO DE ANIMALES
John Reynolds, Maricopa County Animal Care and Control Representative, introduced
Annabelle. She came to the shelter as a stray, loves to be around people and was
available for an adoption fee of $300.00. He explained that the fee would assist five
additional animals within the shelter.
PRESENTATIONS - PRESENTACIÓNES
5. RESOLUTION DECLARING MARICOPA COUNTY A SECOND AMENDMENT
PRESERVATION COUNTY
Approve and Adopt a Resolution of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors supporting
the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article II Section 26 of the
Constitution of the State of Arizona, and declaring Maricopa County a “Second Amendment
Preservation County”. (C-06-20-408-7-00)
Chairman Hickman Introduced the next agenda item Regarding a resolution about a
Second Amendment preservation County. The Chairman explained the resolutions are
not bound by law but are often brought forward to the Board of Supervisors regarding
concerns that community members have brought to their attention. The Chairman
explained that the Board of Supervisors often deals with issues related to the
unincorporated areas of the County. He commented that he had received a number of

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 3 of 50
inquiries from constituents in his district regarding this particular issue. The Chairman
also commented that he had been the president of the County Supervisors Association,
and that it was widely known that he comes from a rural area of Maricopa County. He
also explained that his district shares a border with Yavapai and with La Paz counties.
All of these factors show that his district has a unique character as it deals with both
urban and rural areas.
The Chairman than asked the Clerk, Fran McCarroll, to read the resolution. (Full text of
the resolution can be found below.)
After the Clerk read the resolution, the Chairman further explained the role of the
Chairman of the Board to place items on the agenda. He also explained that items on
the agenda are sent to the County Attorney’s Office for review. As such, he invited Tom
Liddy, Director of the County Attorney’s Civil Division to come forward to answer any
questions Board members may have. Chairman Hickman stated that this time would be
for Board members to comment and/or ask questions. Any public comments on this
item would be taken at the end of the meeting under the heading of Public Comment.
The Chairman then asked if there were any questions from the Supervisors.
Supervisor Gallardo asked Mr. Liddy if there were currently measures in place that if
any type of a governing body violated Second Amendments rights, the matter could be
taken to court. Mr. Liddy replied that the statement was correct. Supervisor Gallardo
then questioned why there would be a need for this action. He further commented that
he felt if there was a need for such action that it would be best handled at the state
legislature.
Supervisor Gallardo then asked a question related to the Heller case which dealt with
the ability of governing bodies to prohibit bringing firearms into public buildings. Before
the response, Supervisor Gates commented that this type of question should be
discussed in an executive session meeting. Supervisor Gallardo responded that he
agreed with this statement and commented that the item should be tabled until the
Supervisors could meet in executive session regarding the issue and discuss possible
related constitutional issues.
Attorney Liddy commented that the County Attorney’s Office does not deal in
hypotheticals, but also commented that the case, District of Columbia v. Heller, deals
with more than the limited mention of it in this Resolution. An important point was the
Supreme Court recognizing the right to keep and bear arms belongs to an individual as
opposed to a state. Many have argued that the right to bear arms was regarding a state
that had a militia. However, the Supreme Court stated that it was an individual right as
are all of the rights in the Bill of Rights. The Heller case has several ramifications, but it
is clear that state and federal governments can place some limitations on rights to bear
arms as in the case of the rights of a felon.
Supervisor Gallardo further stated that the Heller case dealt with the right of an
individual to bear arms in their own home. The Supreme Court broadened their
response in this case to other issues related to bearing arms. Mr. Liddy responded that
it was a broad case and he would be happy to meet with the Board regarding these
issues to provide a more thorough review.
Supervisor Gallardo indicated that some of his concerns dealt with the language in
some of the “…be it further resolved,” statements. He felt that some of those statements
raised some questions for him, and possibly for other County-wide electeds. Mr. Liddy
further commented that the County Attorney’s Office did not draft the Resolution, and
noted that three times the Resolution refers to Supreme Court decisions related to his

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 4 of 50
issue. He said that this indicates the Resolution recognizes the importance of Judicial
review which come from the Marbury v Madison case from 1803. The principle in this
case is a question of whether a particular statute runs afoul of the Constitution belongs
to the judiciary. He further stated that there was nothing in this document, if the body
were to approve it, “that would be substituting its own analytical ability in front of the
Courts.”
Chairman Hickman thanked Mr. Liddy for his comments and then recognized Supervisor
Chucri.
Supervisor Chucri stated that he wanted to make a motion to approve this item, but with
an amendment. He commented that the Board often approves a Proclamation or
Resolution memorializing certain issues. Equally, he recognized that at times there are
disagreements on particular issues among Board members, however, in many ways
Maricopa County is one big family. He noted that he had also heard from a number of
his constituents regarding this particular issue. He commented that this issue reminded
him of his oath of office taken for each term which oath confirms the defense of the
Constitution of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona.
Supervisor Churci further stated that he has heard from a number of constituents and
even from members of law enforcement regarding this issue. He continued by stating a
concern he and others may have about a possible unintended consequence which is
found in the final, “be it further resolved.” This section deals with the Board not
appropriating government funds, resources, etc. He indicated that he was making a
motion to adopt the Resolution with the amendment to strike that section. He stated
that this resolution is a step to memorialize the Oath of Office he took for each of his
terms on the Board of Supervisors.
Chairman Hickman seconded the motion.
Supervisor Gallardo commented that he agreed there has been a wonderful working
relationship among the Board members, often similar to one big family. He stated that
the Board has always tried to consider what is best for the County, whether it is an
appointment or other resolutions. However, he felt that this issue was more than just a
disagreement. He stated there are two types of resolutions; one that brings the body
and the community together. It states, “this is where Maricopa County stands on this
issue.” He stated that those are the types of resolutions that he supports, but felt this
one could not be compared to resolutions regarding the Boy’s Club or Domestic
Violence. He felt that this resolution goes to core values of many people. He felt the
Board should slow down and take more time to consider this resolution and meet with
the County Attorney as well as other County Officials. He further commented that he is
proud to put aside partisanship to stand with County Attorney Bill Montgomery regarding
issues related to children and to stand with Governor Ducey regarding domestic
violence.
Supervisor Gallardo stated that he did not feel that resolutions should be partisan,
mean-spirited or divisive. He reminded the Board that in 1997 a former Board member
was shot as she exited the chambers. She was shot by a person who did not go
through a background check or a mental health evaluation. He stated that he felt the
discussion should include a dialog about the root cause of gun violence. But he also
stated that he felt individuals have the right to bear arms, and that he supports the
second amendment. He felt there should be a “common sense approach” to the issue to
make sure that “bad guys” are not in possession of guns. Finally, he commented that if
anything, this issue should be dealt with at the legislature as he did not feel this is a
County issue. There is an avenue through the courts to deal with these issues.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 5 of 50
Chairman Hickman thanked Supervisor Gallardo for his comments. He also stated that
this is a resolution that basically reaffirms the Board’s support of the Constitution in its
entirety. He reiterated that his district includes many rural areas and that a number of
constituents had called or commented that they want to be sure that their rights are not
infringed upon. They want to be secure in their right to bear arms to protect their
property and their families.
Supervisor Chucri stated that he supported the idea of resolutions and did not mean to
compare this one with things like domestic violence. He agreed that the Board is a
group who works well together and have at times been recognized for that cooperative
approach to issues. Recognizing those points, he reiterated that this issue is important
to many people and that he had heard from citizens in his district.
Supervisor Sellers commented that he was one who might have desired to have a more
thorough discussion with legal staff regarding this issue. However, he stated that he
now feels more comfortable moving forward with the amendment made by Supervisor
Chucri, and that he is now ready for the vote on this issue.
Chairman Hickman called for the vote on the Resolution as amended by Supervisor
Chucri. (Motion to approve as amended by Supervisor Chucri. Second by Chairman
Hickman.)
Ayes: Hickman, Gates, Chucri, Sellers
Nay: Gallardo
(The approved Resolution as amended follows here and is on file in the Clerk of the
Board's office in accordance with LAPR retention guidelines.)
A RESOLUTION OF THE MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SUPPORTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION AND ARTICLE II SECTION 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
STATE OF ARIZONA, AND DECLARING MARICOPA COUNTY A “SECOND
AMENDMENT PRESERVATION COUNTY”
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors met in Regular Session this 26th day of February
2020; and
WHEREAS, Arizona Revised Statute § 11-251 (17) and (21) provide authorization for
the Board of Supervisors to “adopt provisions necessary to preserve the health of the
county” and “make and enforce necessary rules and regulations for the government of
its body, the preservation of order and the transaction of business;” and
WHEREAS, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted in 1791
as part of the Bill of Rights, protects the fundamental and individual right of the people to
keep and bear arms; and
WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States, in District of Columbia v. Heller,
554 U.S. 570 (2008), affirmed an individual’s right to possess firearms unconnected with
service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home;
and

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 6 of 50
WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States, in McDonald v Chicago, 561 U.S.
742 (2010), affirmed that the right of an individual to “keep and bear arms,” as protected
under the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment and therefore applicable against the several states of the
United States; and
WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States, in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S.
174 (1939), opined that firearms that are part of ordinary military equipment, or whose
use could contribute to the common defense, are protected by the Second Amendment;
and
WHEREAS, Article II, Section 26 of the Constitution of the State of Arizona provides
that “the right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the state
shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing
individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men.”;
and
WHEREAS, upon assuming office the members of the Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors took an oath to support and defend the United States Constitution and the
Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona, and today hereby reaffirm our
commitment to the United States Constitution and the Constitution and laws of the State
of Arizona.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors, by the authority granted by the Constitution and laws of the State of
Arizona and the people of Maricopa County, Arizona, do hereby commit to stand and
defend their rights and liberties as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the
Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors affirms its
support of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and declares
Maricopa County a Second Amendment Preservation County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors will not
authorize or appropriate government funds, resources, employees, agencies
contractors, buildings, detention centers or officers to infringe on the people’s
constitutional rights, including the right to keep and bear arms.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors this 26th
day of February 2020.
/s/ Clint Hickman, Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
/s/ Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board
APPROVED TO FORM:
/s/ Thomas P. Liddy, Deputy County Attorney

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 7 of 50
PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA
AGENDA DE PLANIFICACIÓN Y ZONIFICACIÓN
***The Board of Supervisors will now consider matters related to Planning and Zoning***
CONSENT AGENDA - AGENDA DE CONSIENTA
Chairman Hickman stated that the Board would consider Planning items PZ-1-4 and PZ-6-9, and
that they would take item PZ-5 separately.
PZ-1. JY ENERGY SOLAR PROJECT
Case #: CPA2019003
Supervisor District: 5
Applicant / Owner: Mike Jang, JY Energy LLC / Juyun Lee
Request: General Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land use designation
from Rural Densities (0-1 d.u./ac.) to Utilities. CPA case approval is by Resolution,
attached.
Site Location: Generally located at the southwest corner of the 571st Avenue and Northern
Avenue alignments in the Harquahala Valley area
Commission Recommendation: On 1/30/20, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend
approval of CPA2019003 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘b’:
a. Development and use of the site shall comply with the narrative report entitled “Project
Narrative Report for JY Energy Tonopah Solar Plan General Comprehensive Plan
Amendment (Revised)” consisting of 8 pages, including all exhibits, dated November 5,
2019 and stamped received November 8, 2019 except as modified by the following
conditions.
b. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the
property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the uses existing on the date of
application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition,
the property shall revert to the land use designation that existed on the date of application.
It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with
any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use,
divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such change of the land
use. The land use enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the
land use change is granted and reverting to the prior land use designation results in the
same value of the property as if the land use change had never been granted. (C-44-20-
074-M-00)

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 8 of 50
Motion to concur with the Planning Commission and approve CPA by Resolution made
by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
(The approved Resolution follows here and is on file in the Clerk of the Board's office in
accordance with LAPR retention guidelines.)
RESOLUTION OF AMENDMENT
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
Vision 2030, Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
Resolution Amending the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
Case Number: CPA2019003
February 26, 2020
BE IT RESOLVED by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors as follows:
WHEREAS, Maricopa County adopted its Comprehensive Plan in accordance with
Arizona Revised Statutes to help bring about coordinated physical development
consistent with the present and future needs of Maricopa County; and
WHEREAS, Maricopa County recognizes the importance of having a comprehensive
plan amendment process so that this plan can be responsive and flexible to meet the
changing conditions of Maricopa County; and
WHEREAS, Maricopa County has procedures to determine when comprehensive plan
amendments are necessary, how comprehensive plan amendments are processed, and
at what point comprehensive plan amendments can be presented at a public hearing by
the Board of Supervisors, upon recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, Arizona Revised Statutes requires that amendments to the Comprehensive
Plan be approved by resolution of the Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors has carefully considered this
comprehensive plan amendment, has held a public hearing regarding this
comprehensive plan amendment, and finds that this comprehensive plan amendment
constitutes an overall improvement to the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan, and to
Maricopa County in general.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the comprehensive plan amendment for
case number CPA2019003, is hereby approved this 26th day of February 2020.
/s/ Clint Hickman, Chairman
/s/ Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board
/s/ Jennifer Pokorski, Director, Planning and Development Department

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 9 of 50
PZ-2. JY ENERGY SOLAR PROJECT
Case #: Z2019046
Supervisor District: 5
Applicant / Owner: Mike Jang, JY Energy LLC / Juyun Lee
Request: Zone Change from Rural-190 to IND-2 IUPD
Site Location: Generally located at the southwest corner of the 571st Avenue and Northern
Avenue alignments in the Harquahala Valley area
Commission Recommendation: On 1/30/20, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend
approval of Z2019046 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘i’:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled
“Tonopah Project“, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated August 1, 2019 and stamped
received August 2, 2019, except as modified by the following conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Project Narrative Report for JY Energy Tonopah Solar Plant RE-Zoning Request.
(Revised)”, consisting of 4 pages, dated July 31, 2019, and stamped received August 2,
2019 except as modified by the following conditions.
c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply:
1. At the time of application for building/grading permits, an engineered design for the
retention basin berm stabilization (along the wash alignment near the southeast corner of
the site) must be provided. Said design must include onsite flows (±40 acres) not
intercepted by the retention basin.
2. At the time of application for building permits, the preserved area (65’) along the
northern part of the site shall be included in the retention calculations. The retention
calculations contained in the Drainage Report shall govern over those shown on the
grading and drainage plans.
3. Access to the site is remote. Prior to issuance any building permits for this project, the
owner/applicant/contractor must coordinate a construction access route plan and procure
the required Dust Control permits from Maricopa County Air Quality.
4. PND Engineering review of entitlement cases is conceptual. At the time of application for
building/grading permits, all development and engineering design shall be in conformance
with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and
Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design
Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
d. The following IND-2 IUPD standards shall apply:
1. Three required parking spaces.
2. Chain link fencing, including concertina or barbed wire topping, and gates shall be
allowed on the perimeter.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 10 of 50
e. The IUPD overlay is applied to restrict the use of the site. Until such time as the site is
served by sewer, uses on the site shall only be those acceptable to the Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department (MCESD) that can be accommodated by septic
systems. A public water system and public sewer system shall be required prior to
establishment of any non-residential use that requires potable water.
f. Zoning approval is conditional per Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance, Article 304.6, and
ARS § 11-814 for five (5) years for the initial phase and an additional five (5) years for each
subsequent phase, within which time the initial building permit or construction permit must
be obtained. The applicant shall submit a written report every five years from the date of
Board of Supervisors approval of Z2019008 which details the status of this project,
including progress on obtaining building and/or construction permits. The status report to
be administratively reviewed by Planning and Development with the ability to
administratively accept or to carry the status report to the Board of Supervisors (Board),
upon recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission (Commission) for
consideration of amendments or revocation of zoning for undeveloped parcels. Status
reports will be required until completion of the project.
g. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a
revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
h. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the
County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions.
i. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the
property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of
application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition,
the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore,
stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any
conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide,
sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property
from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone
Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the
date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value
of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-20-075-M-00)
Motion to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation by Supervisor
Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
PZ-3. RIEFKOHL CONSTRUCTION YARD
Case #: Z2019031
Supervisor District: 4
Applicant & Owner: Keith Riefkohl, Petra Contracting
Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for a construction yard in the Rural-43 zoning district
Site Location: Generally located south of Van Buren St., approx. 1,500 ft. east of Perryville
Road in the Goodyear area

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 11 of 50
Commission Recommendation: On 1/30/20, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend
approval of Z2019031 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled
“Site Plan for Petra Contracting”, consisting of 3 full-size sheets, dated April 2019, and
stamped received August 9, 2019 except as modified by the following conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Petra Contracting”, consisting of 6 pages, dated April 2019 and stamped received
August 9, 2019, except as modified by the following conditions.
c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply:
1. As noted in the Pre-Application summary, there are several open (unresolved)
Floodplain Use Permits on this site. The recommended solution is that a single site-wide
floodplain use permit be initiated for this site to encompass all prior work performed on the
site, including unpermitted work, and that the open permits be subsequently closed.
2. As part of the overall Floodplain Use Permit, elevation certificates (ECs) will be required
for any buildings that do not already have them, including buildings 4 (enclosed metal shop
building) and 5 (enclosed metal storage building) as shown on the Site Plan. If the building
6 (covered open air storage) has more than 1 wall, it will also need an EC, if it is supported
by posts and a maximum of 1 wall, then it will not. There is already an EC for 8 (modular
office building).
3. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for
construction.
4. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only and
does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle applicants to future designs that
are not in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and
Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; and the
MCDOT Roadway Design Manual.
5. Detailed Grading and Drainage Plans showing the new site improvements must be
submitted for approval and acquisition of building permits.
d. This Special Use Permit shall expire on February 26, 2030.
e. Prior to occupying the existing residence or any portion thereof for any use associated
with the Special Use Permit, the applicant shall obtain Building Permits to retrofit the
existing buildings to meet current commercial building code requirements as applicable and
shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the retrofitted building prior to occupancy.
f. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a
revocation of this Special Use Permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance.
g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the
property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of
application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition,

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 12 of 50
and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert to the
zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that
either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the
Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to
use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of
the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or
expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the
property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to
the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had
never been granted. (C-44-20-076-M-00)
Motion to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation by Supervisor
Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
PZ-4. 51ST AVENUE C-2 PROPERTY REZONING
Case #: Z2019089
Supervisor District: 5
Applicant / Owners: Tiffany & Bosco, P.A. / All Other Property, LLC and 7145 S. 51st
Avenue LLC
Request: Zone Change from Rural-43 to C-2
Site Location: Generally located 1,300’ north of the northeast corner of 51st Ave. and
Baseline Rd. in the Laveen area
Commission Recommendation: On 1/30/20, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend
approval of Z2019089 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit
entitled “51st Ave & Baseline Rd.”, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated revised January 14,
2020, and stamped received January 14, 2020, except as modified by the following
conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “51st Avenue C-2 Property Rezoning”, consisting of 10 pages, dated December 12,
2019 and stamped received December 13, 2019, except as modified by the following
conditions.
c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply:
1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is
inferred by this review, including, but not limited to drainage design, access and roadway
alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are
submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement.
2. Access to 51st Avenue shall be subject to review and approval by the City of Phoenix.
3. Dedication of additional right-of-way along 51st Avenue may be required as part of
further site entitlements (i.e. plan of development).

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 13 of 50
4. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance, Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for
construction.
d. Unless annexed the applicant/property owner shall submit a ‘will serve’ letter for fire
protection services for the project site. A copy of the ‘will serve’ letter shall be required as
part of the initial construction permit submittal.
e. Prior to approval of the initial final plat, precise plan of development approval, or zoning
clearance for any construction permits, the applicant shall provide the Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department with an executed pre-annexation service
agreement with the City of Phoenix that identifies the detail for when the proposed project
will be annexed and the provision of water and sewer service. In lieu of a pre-annexation
service agreement the developer must provide a ‘will serve’ letter from the certificated
water and sewer provider.
f. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a
revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
g. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the
County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions.
h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the
property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of
application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition,
the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore,
stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any
conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide,
sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property
from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone
Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the
date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value
of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-20-077-M-00)
Motion to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation by Supervisor
Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
PZ-5. SONTERRA MODIFICATION OF CONDITION
Case #: Z2019142
Supervisor District: 1
Applicant / Owners: Warren Petersen, VIP Custom Homes, LLC and Rhonda Hertz / VIP
Custom Homes, LLC and Rhonda Hertz
Request: Modification of condition to increase the maximum Lot Coverage to 25% in the
Rural-43 RUPD zoning district

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 14 of 50
Site Location: Generally located at the SEC of Riggs Road and Tangelo Avenue in the
Queen Creek area.
Commission Recommendation: On 1/30/20, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend
approval of Z2019142 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘m’:
a. Case Z2005006 shall rezone parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD as
indicated on the zoning exhibit entitled “Proposed Zoning Boundary Map (Project Name:
Chandler Heights RUPD, Case Number: Z2005006)” and dated (as of) April 24, 2006,
except as modified by the following stipulations.
b. Only parcels for which written property owner authorization has been received from the
property owner of record shall be considered to be rezoned from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-
43 RUPD as per case Z2005006.
c. In the event that property owners within the perimeter boundary shown on the zoning
exhibit referenced in stipulation ‘a’ (Hunt Hwy. on the south; 172nd St., San Tan Blvd., and
Recker Rd. on the west, Riggs Rd. on the north, and Sossaman Rd. on the east) wish to
rezone their individual parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD with the same RUPD
standards to apply, the Commission shall initiate a rezone on their behalf.
d. Development and use within the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district shall comply with the site
plan and narrative report entitled “Site Plan” (Project Name: Chandler Heights RUPD Case
#Z-2005006)” consisting of 16 pages including exhibits and sections under different title
pages dated January 1, 2006, except that revised exhibits are dated (as of) April 24, 2006,
except as modified by the following stipulations. Development of the site shall also be in
conformance with the modification of conditions Narrative Report entitled “Narrative of
Request for Zone Change Modification of Condition for Sonterra”, consisting of 7 pages,
dated December 6, 2019 and stamped received December 9, 2019.
e. The use regulations, height regulations, parking regulations and sign regulations of the
Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the Rural-43 zoning district.
f. The yard regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the R-4
zoning district.
g. The intensity of use regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as
the R1-35 zoning district except that:
1. The average lot area per dwelling unit shall be 43,560 sq. ft.
2. The minimum lot width shall be 120’.
h. Any parcel rezoned under case Z2005006 that is substandard or otherwise
nonconforming in regard to the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district must document Legal Non-
Conforming (LNC) status with the Planning & Development Department. It is the
responsibility of the property owner to document LNC status.
i. There shall be no relief granted to the development standards of the Rural-43 RUPD
development standards except with Variance approval by the Board of Adjustment.
j. Secondary dwelling units (guest homes, casitas, etc.) shall be allowed in the Rural-43
RUPD zoning district with demonstration of adequate liquid waste disposal at the discretion
of the Environmental Services Department.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 15 of 50
k. Any subdivision plat within the Rural-43 zoning district shall include the following RUPD
Chart:
1. Avg. Lot Area / D.U.: 43,560 sq. ft.
2. Min. Lot Area: 35,000 sq. ft.
3. Min. Lot Width: 120’
4. Max. Lot Coverage: 25%
5. Min. Distance Between Buildings: 15’
6. Min. Front Setback: 20’
7. Min. Rear Setback: 25’
8. Min. Side Setback: 5’
9. Min. Street-Side Setback: 10’
10. Max. Building Height: 30’ (2 stories)
11. Off-Street Parking: 2 / d.u.
12. Signs: Same as Rural-43
13. Uses: Same as Rural-43
14. Accessory Dwelling Units: One (1) secondary dwelling unit allowed with MCESD
approval of liquid waste disposal system
l. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a
revocation of this Zone Change Modification of Condition as set forth in the Maricopa
County Zoning Ordinance.
m. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the
property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of
the application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any
condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is,
therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any
conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide,
sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property
from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone
Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the
date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value
of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-20-078-M-00)
NOTE: Agenda item #PZ-5 was taken out of order and was heard after agenda item PZ-
9.
PZ-6. LAS CASAS AT WINDROSE
Case #: S2019017
Supervisor District: 4
Applicant / Owner: Dan Auxier, EPS Group Inc. / Windrose Build to Rent, LLC
Request: Final Plat for a residential subdivision consisting of 133 lots and 36 tracts in the
R-4 RUPD zoning district
Site Location: Generally located at the northwest corner of Camelback Rd. and 189th Ave.
Staff Recommendation: Approve (C-44-20-079-M-00)

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 16 of 50
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
PZ-7. TB NORTH GARAGE CONDOMINIUM
Case #: S2019022
Supervisor District: 3
Applicant / Owner: Matthew Mancini, 3 engineering LLC / LM North LLC
Request: Condominium plat consisting of 59 condominium units and 54 parking units within
the C-2 CUPD zoning district
Site Location: Generally located approx. 670’ north of the northwest corner of Cave Creek
Rd. and Lone Mountain Rd. in the Phoenix area
Staff Recommendation: Approve (C-44-20-080-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
PZ-8. PROSEK RESIDENCE VISTA VERDE UNIT 1, LOT 165
Case #: S2019028
Supervisor District: 2
Applicant / Owner: Rob Jarrett, Jarrett Engineering, LLC / Chris & Sharon Prosek
Request: Replat to modify a drainage easement on Lot 165 of Vista Verde Unit 1
Site Location: 17544 E. Bushey Mountain Ct. in the Rio Verde area
Staff Recommendation: Approve (C-44-20-081-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
PZ-9. ROYAL OAKS
Case #: S2019033
Supervisor District: 4
Applicant / Owner: Michael Caylor, Westwood Professional Services / People of Faith Inc.
and Cactus Sky Holdings
Request: Re-plat to the existing Home Services Center subdivision to consolidate into a
single parcel in the C-2 zoning district

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 17 of 50
Site Location: Generally located at the southwest corner of Royal Oak Rd. and 99th Ave. in
the Sun City area
Staff Recommendation: Approve (C-44-20-082-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
NOTE: Agenda item #PZ-5 was taken out of order and heard after agenda item PZ-9.
~ Supervisor Chucri declared a conflict of interest and left the dais ~
PZ-5. SONTERRA MODIFICATION OF CONDITION
Case #: Z2019142
Supervisor District: 1
Applicant / Owners: Warren Petersen, VIP Custom Homes, LLC and Rhonda Hertz / VIP
Custom Homes, LLC and Rhonda Hertz
Request: Modification of condition to increase the maximum Lot Coverage to 25% in the
Rural-43 RUPD zoning district
Site Location: Generally located at the SEC of Riggs Road and Tangelo Avenue in the
Queen Creek area.
Commission Recommendation: On 1/30/20, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend
approval of Z2019142 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘m’:
a. Case Z2005006 shall rezone parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD as
indicated on the zoning exhibit entitled “Proposed Zoning Boundary Map (Project Name:
Chandler Heights RUPD, Case Number: Z2005006)” and dated (as of) April 24, 2006,
except as modified by the following stipulations.
b. Only parcels for which written property owner authorization has been received from the
property owner of record shall be considered to be rezoned from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-
43 RUPD as per case Z2005006.
c. In the event that property owners within the perimeter boundary shown on the zoning
exhibit referenced in stipulation ‘a’ (Hunt Hwy. on the south; 172nd St., San Tan Blvd., and
Recker Rd. on the west, Riggs Rd. on the north, and Sossaman Rd. on the east) wish to
rezone their individual parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD with the same RUPD
standards to apply, the Commission shall initiate a rezone on their behalf.
d. Development and use within the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district shall comply with the site
plan and narrative report entitled “Site Plan” (Project Name: Chandler Heights RUPD Case
#Z-2005006)” consisting of 16 pages including exhibits and sections under different title
pages dated January 1, 2006, except that revised exhibits are dated (as of) April 24, 2006,
except as modified by the following stipulations. Development of the site shall also be in
conformance with the modification of conditions Narrative Report entitled “Narrative of
Request for Zone Change Modification of Condition for Sonterra”, consisting of 7 pages,
dated December 6, 2019 and stamped received December 9, 2019.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 18 of 50
e. The use regulations, height regulations, parking regulations and sign regulations of the
Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the Rural-43 zoning district.
f. The yard regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the R-4
zoning district.
g. The intensity of use regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as
the R1-35 zoning district except that:
1. The average lot area per dwelling unit shall be 43,560 sq. ft.
2. The minimum lot width shall be 120’.
h. Any parcel rezoned under case Z2005006 that is substandard or otherwise
nonconforming in regard to the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district must document Legal Non-
Conforming (LNC) status with the Planning & Development Department. It is the
responsibility of the property owner to document LNC status.
i. There shall be no relief granted to the development standards of the Rural-43 RUPD
development standards except with Variance approval by the Board of Adjustment.
j. Secondary dwelling units (guest homes, casitas, etc.) shall be allowed in the Rural-43
RUPD zoning district with demonstration of adequate liquid waste disposal at the discretion
of the Environmental Services Department.
k. Any subdivision plat within the Rural-43 zoning district shall include the following RUPD
Chart:
1. Avg. Lot Area / D.U.: 43,560 sq. ft.
2. Min. Lot Area: 35,000 sq. ft.
3. Min. Lot Width: 120’
4. Max. Lot Coverage: 25%
5. Min. Distance Between Buildings: 15’
6. Min. Front Setback: 20’
7. Min. Rear Setback: 25’
8. Min. Side Setback: 5’
9. Min. Street-Side Setback: 10’
10. Max. Building Height: 30’ (2 stories)
11. Off-Street Parking: 2 / d.u.
12. Signs: Same as Rural-43
13. Uses: Same as Rural-43
14. Accessory Dwelling Units: One (1) secondary dwelling unit allowed with MCESD
approval of liquid waste disposal system
l. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a
revocation of this Zone Change Modification of Condition as set forth in the Maricopa
County Zoning Ordinance.
m. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the
property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of
the application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any
condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is,
therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any
conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide,
sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 19 of 50
from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone
Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the
date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value
of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-20-078-M-00)
The Chairman asked if there was anyone present to comment on item PZ-5. Hearing
none, he called for a motion.
Motion to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation by Supervisor Sellers,
seconded by Supervisor Gates
Ayes: Sellers, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Recused: Chucri
~ Supervisor Chucri returned to the dais ~
STATUTORY HEARINGS - AUDIENCIAS LEGALES
Clerk of the Board - Secretaria de la Junta
6. LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS - APLICACIONES DE LICENCIA DE LICOR
This is the time scheduled for a public hearing on the applications for liquor licenses. At this
hearing, the Board of Supervisors will determine the recommendation to the State Liquor
Board as to whether the State Liquor Board should grant or deny the license.
a. SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FOR BANNER HEALTH FOUNDATION
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-203.02, approve a Special Event Liquor License Application
filed by Kasey Ann Huhta for Banner Health Foundation at 19803 North R H
Johnson Boulevard, Sun City West, Arizona 85375 to be held on Saturday, March 7,
2020 from 11:00 am to 7:00 pm (Supervisorial District 4) (C-06-20-293-L-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
b. SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FOR ARIZONA LUTHERAN ACADEMY
FEDERATION
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-203.02, approve a Special Event Liquor License Application
filed by Doug Neil Meyer for Arizona Lutheran Academy Federation at 6036 South
27th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85041 to be held on Saturday, March 7, 2020 from
5:00 pm to 9:00 pm (Supervisorial District 5) (C-06-20-378-L-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 20 of 50
c. SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FOR SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
CENTER
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-203.02, approve a Special Event Liquor License Application
filed by Robin Christine Wilson for Southwest Wildlife Conservation Center at 27026
North 156th Street, Scottsdale, Arizona 85262 to be held on Sunday, April 5, 2020
from 4:00 pm to 8:00 pm. (Supervisorial District 2) (C-06-20-379-L-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
d. SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FOR RISEN SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-203.02, approve a Special Event Liquor License Application
filed by Ronald D. Burcham for Risen Savior Lutheran Church at 23914 South Alma
School Road, Sun Lakes, Arizona 85248 to be held on Saturday, April 4, 2020 from
5:00 pm to 11:59 pm. (Supervisorial District 1) (C-06-20-390-L-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
AGENCY ITEMS AND STATUTORY MATTERS
ARTÍCULOS DE AGENCIA Y ASUNTOS REGLAMENTARIOS
COUNTY OFFICERS - OFICIALES DE CONDADO
Recorder – Registradora
7. OFFICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND OATHS OF OFFICE
Pursuant to A.R.S. §11-409, approve the official appointment of the following deputies and
assistants of the Maricopa County Recorder. Authorize the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors to certify the Official Appointment and Oaths of Office in accordance with
A.R.S. §38-231.
August 12, 2019
Melissa Davis – Community Relations Coordinator
February 27, 2017
Erika Castillo – Records Processor
Franjo Andric – Records Processor
September 3, 2019
Natalie Timmons – Voter Registration Specialist
Regina Lopez – Records Processor
Francisco Garibay – Records Processor
October 7, 2019
Diana Solorio – Constituent Correspondent
Michael Moore – IT Department Security Officer

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 21 of 50
The Recorder is an Officer of the County, as enumerated in A.R.S. § 11-401, and pursuant
to A.R.S. § 11-409, such an enumerated County Officer may appoint deputies and
assistants with the consent of the Board of Supervisors. (C-36-20-003-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
8. LEASE AGREEMENT WITH APS FOR USE OF PARKING SPACE
Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Lease Agreement L-7486 (Lease) with
Arizona Public Service Company (APS), for use of parking space on parcel APN 112-18-
116 located at 702 South Montezuma Ave, Phoenix, Arizona, 85003.
This Lease is to provide an additional parking area near Maricopa County Elections’
MCTEC Office to meet a portion of the parking demands for staff and volunteers working
the upcoming Primary and General election which are scheduled from March 2020 through
November 2022. The term of the Lease will commence upon full execution of the Lease
and expire on February 28, 2021 and will automatically extend in month-to-month periods
upon the same terms and conditions set forth in the Lease. The County will be responsible
for ensuring the parking area is in compliance with applicable air quality rules and
regulations. As consideration, the County will pay an annual rental fee of $12,000.00
($1,000.00 per month) plus any applicable taxes, within thirty (30) days of the
Commencement Date. If County continues to occupy the premises after February 28,
2021, County will be invoiced for monthly payments of $1,000.00 plus any applicable taxes.
In addition to rent, County will be responsible to pay APS for two Phase I inspections of the
property, the first within thirty (30) days of the Commencement Date of the Lease and the
other, if required by APS, upon Lease termination. This Lease is subject to A.R.S. § 38-511
and may be terminated by either party at any time after expiration of the Initial Term upon
thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to the other party. County may also terminate this
Lease at the end of any fiscal year due to non-appropriation of funds without any penalty or
liability to County. This is located in Supervisory District 5. (C-21-20-003-1-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Sheriff – Alguacil
9. SUPPLEMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG
CONTROL POLICY FOR THE HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA
PROGRAM – INITIATIVE XXIX
Approve acceptance of Supplement #2 in the amount of $1,654.00 to the Grant Award with
the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) Award Number G19SA0005A, for the
High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Program. This supplement is an increase of
$1,654.00 increasing the agreement amount from $654,949.30 to $656,603.30. The term of
this funding is unchanged January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020.
The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office will receive an additional $1,654 (increasing its
current portion of the award from $466,533.60 to $468,187.60). The Sheriff’s Office indirect
cost rate for FY20 is 16.3%. The total unrecoverable indirect cost amount is $269.60. The
unrecoverable indirect cost of $269.60 will be covered by the department General Fund.
HIDTA funding is recurring, and there is no match requirement.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 22 of 50
The original funding was approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 22, 2019 (C-50-19-
079-G-00). Supplement 1 was approved on 7/31/2019 (C-50-19-079-G-01).
Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitation, and therefore, expenditures of these revenues are not prohibited by the budget
law.
The HIDTA Program is sponsored/funded by the Office o National Drug Control Policy
(ONDCP). These grant funds are to support and enhance activities in accordance with the
approved ONDCP HIDTA Program Policy and Budget Guidance (PPBG). There has been
participation in the HIDTA program since approximately 1998. (C-50-19-079-G-02)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
COUNTY MANAGEMENT - ADMINISTRADORES DEL CONDADO
Assistant County Manager - Sub Directora de Condado - Lee Ann Bohn
10. APPOINTMENT OF MARICOPA COUNTY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD
MEMBER
Appoint the following individual to represent the Business Category for the term effective
upon approval until June 30, 2020 and the subsequent term effective July 1, 2020 until
June 30, 2023:
Matthew McGuire, Dignity Health/Arizona Health Collaborative
The MCWDB is established and receives its authority in accordance with the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), which was signed into law on July 22, 2014 as
Public Law 113-128. (C-95-20-003-9-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
COUNTY OFFICES AND DEPARTMENTS
DEPARTAMENTOS Y OFICINAS DEL CONDADO
Animal Care and Control Services - Servicios de Control y Cuidado de Animales
11. FIRST AMENDMENT TO NEW HOPE AGREEMENT WITH AMERICA'S FREEDOM
PAWS RESCUE, INC.
Approve and execute the First Amendment to the General Services Contract - New Hope
General Program Agreement ("New Hope Agreement") between Maricopa County,
administered through Animal Care and Control, and America's Freedom Paws Rescue, Inc.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 23 of 50
The First Amendment will extend the New Hope Agreement for a three (3) year term,
effective January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022, as well as replace and supersede
Section XVI - Israel Boycott to reflect current policy language.
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Animal Care and Control estimates eighteen (18) New Hope transfers to America's
Freedom Paws Rescue over the three (3) year term of the amended Agreement. The cost
per transfer is $52/animal in FY2020 and thereafter, for a total of $936. (C-79-19-068-3-01)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
12. KENNEL PERMIT RENEWAL (MULTIPLE DOG LICENSE) FOR YERBRIER KENNELS
Approve kennel permit renewal K20-000005 pursuant to A.R.S. §11-1009 for Yerbrier
Kennels, LLC, 5447 S. El Mirage Road, Tolleson, AZ 85353 in District 5 for a one-year
period beginning on the date of the Board's approval. The cost of a kennel permit is $350.
The total amount received for this kennel permit application is $350. (C-79-20-077-3-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
13. KENNEL PERMIT RENEWAL (MULTIPLE DOG LICENSE) FOR MARILYN PAULEY
DBA EVANZ KENNELS
Approve kennel permit renewal K20-000040 pursuant to A.R.S. §11-1009 for Marilyn
Pauley d/b/a Evanz Kennels, 16853 N. 39th Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85053, in District 3, for a
one-year period beginning on the date of the Board's approval. The cost of a kennel permit
is $350. The total amount received for this kennel permit application is $350. (C-79-20-078-
3-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
14. DONATIONS ABOVE $250 FOR JANUARY 2020
Accept the unrestricted monetary donations of anonymous lock box donations ($271),
Nationwide Foundation ($731), William Seitter ($1,000), Oakwood Ladies Golf League
($2.535), Geraldine McCuan ($4,904), totaling $9,441 for the care of the animals.
Donation funds are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitations and therefore expenditures of these revenues are not prohibited by the budget
law. The approval of this action requested does not alter the budget constraining the
expenditure of local revenues duly adopted by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17105.
(C-79-20-079-D-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 24 of 50
15. RESTRICTED DONATIONS FOR JANUARY 2020
Accept the following restricted cash donations for January 2020:
*$570 from Canine Community Project for the purchase of microchips to be used for stray
animals that are returned to their owners, providing an important piece of identification.
*$1,000 from Hope Emergency Animal Rescue (H.E.A.R.) for the testing and treatment of
MCACC shelter animals suspected to have Valley Fever and/or Tick Fever, as set forth in
the Memorandum of Understanding approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 9,
2019 (C-79-19-062-M-00).
*$6,505 from the Petco Foundation for payment of cancer related medical expenses for
shelter animals, foster animals, and recently adopted animals, which treatment cannot be
provided by MCACC.
*11,800 from the Bissell Pet Foundation in payment of adoption fees for 108 dogs and 20
cats during a sponsored event.
*$13,974 from the Love Pup Foundation for the purchase of microchips for adopted shelter
animals, allowing them to receive this important piece of identification.
*15,000 from Two Pups Wellness Fund, through the Arizona Community Foundation, for
the medical treatment of shelter animals whose needs require additional or supplemental
medications, testing, and/or veterinary care that cannot be provided by MCACC. (C-79-20-
080-D-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
16. DONATIONS IN EXCESS OF $1,000 FOR JANUARY 2020
Accept the following non-cash donations in excess of $1,000 for January 2020:
*1 pallet of pet food, valued at $1,050, from an anonymous donor.
*62 cases of dog treats, valued at $2,600, from Bissell Pet Foundation.
*216 cases of dog treats, valued at $6,169, from Tyson Pet Treats.
Donation funds are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitations and therefore expenditures of these revenues are not prohibited by the budget
law. The approval of this action requested does not alter the budget constraining the
expenditure of local revenues duly adopted by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17105.
(C-79-20-081-D-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
17. DONATION FROM 4 PAWS AND FRIENDS
Accept the non-cash donation from 4 Paws and Friends of high value treats, dog food, and
enrichment items benefitting the animals at the West shelter. This donation is valued at
$4,657.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 25 of 50
Donation funds are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitations and therefore expenditures of these revenues are not prohibited by the budget
law. The approval of this action requested does not alter the budget constraining the
expenditure of local revenues duly adopted by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17105.
(C-79-20-082-D-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Budget Office - Oficina de Presupuestos
18. ULTIS PROJECT BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17106B, authorize the following:
1. Approve the final transfer of FY2020 expenditure authority in the amount of $491,003
from Non Departmental (D470) Technology Capital Improvement Fund (460) ULTIS Project
Reserve (PRSC) to the Non Departmental (D470) Technology Capital Improvement Fund
(460) Treasurer Technology System Upgrade (TTSU) in the Treasurer Technology
Improvements (TTS1) budget. This action will have a net zero impact on the overall County
budget.
The FY 2020 budget includes a project reserve for the Treasurer Technology Project
available to be appropriated to the project after quarterly project health checks. The project
health check was delivered by the County's CIO in February. (C-49-20-019-2-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Emergency Management - Administración de Emergencia
19. TRADE-IN OF WEAPONS FOR CREDIT TOWARD PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT
WEAPONS
Pursuant to the Maricopa County Procurement Code, MC1-803, approve the trade-in of
specialized weapons for a credit of $4,810.00 to be used toward the purchase of new
specialized weapons. The list of items to be traded with the corresponding trade-in value is
attached to this agenda item.
The Maricopa County Office of Procurement Services and Maricopa County Security
Services is working with PROFORCE Law Enforcement, County Contract 190291-C, and
section 4.12 TRADE-INS to facilitate this trade in and subsequent Procurement. Approval
of this item allows Maricopa County Security Services to dispose of worn, old, and in some
cases obsolete weapons with the benefit of applying credit toward the purchase of
replacement items. Replacement items and costs are included along with the trade in credit
and attached with this agenda item. (C-15-20-005-3-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Gallardo, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 26 of 50
Equipment Services - Servicios de Equipo
20. RENEWAL OF VEHICLE EXEMPTIONS FROM MARKINGS
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 38-538-03, approve the continuation of an exemption from County
markings for vehicles belonging to the following departments; Adult Probation, County
Attorney, Juvenile Probation, Sheriff's Office, Public Defender, Legal Defender, Office of
Public Advocate, Superior Court Security.
This is the annual renewal of exemptions that were previously approved by the Board of
Supervisors. The exemption from markings is requested due to the vehicles being used for
felony investigations, activities of a confidential or sensitive nature and social service work.
(C-74-20-002-V-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Finance – Finanzas
21. FUNDS TRANSFERS; WARRANTS - TRANSFERENCIAS DE FONDOS; WARRANTS
Approve regular and routine fund transfers, warrant reports 01/24/2020 through
02/06/2020, from the operating funds to clearing funds including payroll, journal entries,
allocations, loans, and paid claims and authorize the issuance of the appropriate related
warrants. Pursuant to A.R.S. §11-217(D) and A.R.S. §11-623, said warrants and claims are
on file in the Clerk of the Board’s office and retained in accordance with LAPR approved
retention schedule. (C-06-20-395-7-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Human Services - Servicios Humanos
22. ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS FROM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES FOR EARLY HEAD START PROGRAM
Approve the receipt of reprogrammed, unobligated funds from the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (DHHS)/Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Office
of Head Start (OHS), Grant No. 09CH010385-04-01, from Program Year 03 to Program
Year 04. OHS provided a Notice of Award (NOA) for $138,673 for completion of approved
program activities for the Maricopa County Head Start program. The County is a current
recipient of the stated grant and funds provided under this NOA are one-time funding.
Receipt of reprogramed, unobligated funds in the amount of $138,678 are for the budget
period of July 1, 2019 thru June 30, 2020.
The funds will be utilized for the following projects:
• Classroom start up supplies, printers and hearing screening supplies
• Facilities Improvements to Valor Center program site
Funding for Grant No. 09CH010385 was competitive and was awarded to Maricopa County
in July 2017. The purpose of the grant is for the County to provide Head Start and Early
Head Start program services to children ages 0 to 5, supporting families to promote healthy

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 27 of 50
development and to promote school readiness. On October 2019, the Head Start program
submitted to OHS a request to reprogram funds from Program Year 03 to Program Year 04
for the completion of program projects.
The grant requires a 20% non-federal share (NFS) match of the total approved project
costs. The total NFS is increased by $34,740 from $3,557,097 to $3,591,837 for the budget
period of July 1, 2019 thru June 30, 2020. NFS is generated through in-kind donations of
goods and services as well as parent volunteering.
Upon approval of receipt of funds, the grant amount for the budget period shall be
$14,367,061 and the total amount for the project period shall be increased to $54,967,229.
The Human Services Department is utilizing the provisional indirect rate of 22.2% approved
by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for FY2020 for salaries and
employee related expenses. The total carry over funds are $138,673 of which $0 is for
salaries and benefits. The total estimated indirect costs are $0.
Receipt of the carry over funds does not require future or ongoing contributions by the
County at the end of the project period.
The services provided under this grant are not a mandated function but provides a benefit
to the citizens by providing eligible children with high quality care and education by
integrating Head Start performance measures. The approved Head Start enrollment is 807
for 3 to 5 year olds and Early Head Start enrollment is 182 for 0 to 3 year olds.
Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitation, and Therefore, expenditure of the revenues is not prohibited by the budget law.
This Agreement does not alter the budget constraining expenditures of local revenues duly
adopted by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. 42-17105. The overall budget will be adjusted as
necessary to accommodate the grant funding through a future reconciliation.
Acceptance of the grant funds will not impact the County General Fund. Supervisory
District: All (C-22-16-011-G-14)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
23. AMENDMENT TO IGA WITH CITY OF SURPRISE FOR HOME INVESTMENT
PARTNERSHIPS ACTIVITIES
The purpose of the Agreement is for the City to provide owner occupied, single family
housing rehabilitation and Tenant Based Rental Assistance to eligible residents. The
County provided the City with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
for HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) activities.
The Purpose of Amendment No. 3 is to amend Section III (Work Statement) as follows:
A. Remove and replace “2017a Work Statement” activities:
1. Replace with “2017 Work Statement A” which reduces the funding for single-family,
owner occupied housing rehabilitation assistance from $145,126 to $54,526.22. The
remaining fund balance of $90,599.78 shall be utilized to complete the activities listed in
Subsection A.2. All work performed, or costs incurred, shall expire on September 30, 2021.
2. Add “2017 Work Statement B” which allows the City to provide tenant-based rental
assistance to five households. The City shall utilize $90,599.78 from the previously

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 28 of 50
approved “2017a Work Statement” to complete the “2017 Work Statement B” activities. All
work performed, or costs incurred, shall expire on September 30, 2021.
B. Remove the “2018 Work Statement,” which was added by Amendment No. 2, and
replace it with the attached “2018 Work Statement A,” which allows for the City to provide
tenant-based rental assistance to eleven households. Funds from the previously approved
Amendment No. 2, which totaled $193,749 for the “2018 Work Statement” activities, will be
utilized to address the activities in the “2018 Work Statement A.” All work performed, or
costs incurred, shall expire on September 30, 2022.
C. Add an additional Work Statement, referred to as the “2019 Work Statement.” Through
the ”2019 Work Statement”, the City shall provide tenant-based rental assistance to eleven
households. The County shall provide the City with $181,777.64 for the “2019 Work
Statement” activities. The City shall contribute $9,136.80 in HOME Recapture funds for the
“2019 Work Statement” activities. All work performed, or costs incurred, shall expire on
September 30, 2023.
D. Upon approval of Amendment No. 3, the Agreement funding amount shall be increased
from $475,567 to $657,344.64, an increase of $181,777.64.
E. Section IV, Compensation, Subsection D, Reimbursement shall be amended to
reference total funding of $657,344.64.
F. The County shall reimburse the City on a Net 0 payment standard.
G. This Amendment No. 3 is subject to A.R.S. § 38-511.
H. The above sections contain all the changes made by this Amendment No. 3 to the
Agreement and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement
and Amendments Nos. 1 and 2 shall remain in full force and effect as executed by the
Parties.
I. This Amendment No. 3 is effective upon approval and signature by both Parties.
The purpose of the Agreement with the City is to ensure affordable housing is available in
the City of Surprise. Funding for the Agreement is provided by grant funds from the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), (C-22-17-028-3-00). The housing
activities meet all HOME Investment Partnerships Program requirements for the required
period of affordability. Maricopa County is the lead agency for the Maricopa HOME
Consortium.
The FY 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan contains specific projects for funding to implement
the goals of FY2015-2020 Five-Year Consolidated Plan and serve as guides for the
expenditure of HUD funds allocated to Maricopa County. The FY2019-2020 Annual Action
Plan was approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 22, 2019. The proposed project for
the City of Surprise was listed in the FY2019-2020 Annual Action Plan submitted to HUD.
The FY2015-2020 Five Year Consolidated Plan (C-22-15-056-3-00) identifies housing and
non-housing community development needs of low and moderate-income people in the
Maricopa County service area (Urban County and HOME Consortium). The Five Year Plan
establishes goals; and describes performance measures for meeting the goals. The Board
of Supervisors approved the Five-Year Consolidated Plan on May 6, 2015.
Funding is included in the FY2020 budget and does not impact the General Fund.
Supervisor District: 4 (C-22-17-046-3-03)

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 29 of 50
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
24. AMENDMENT TO THE IGA WITH THE CITY OF EL MIRAGE FOR COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ACTIVITIES
Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Intergovernmental Agreement (“Agreement”) between
the City of El Mirage (hereinafter referred to as the “Subrecipient”) and Maricopa County
(the “County”) administered by its Human Services Department.
The purpose of the Amendment is to increase the Agreement funding amount for the
project. Through this Amendment, the County will provide the Subrecipient with $75,000 of
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds for project activities. The Agreement funding amount will
increase from $425,000 to a not-to-exceed amount of $500,000. The Budget and
Compensation sections of the Agreement will change to accommodate the Amendment
funding.
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged.
This Agreement is funded by a grant from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), (C-22-16-032-G) and does not impact the General Fund. New water
lines will improve the public water supply and provide the residents with a sustained and
suitable living environment. Supervisory District 4 (C-22-20-011-3-01)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
25. AMENDMENT TO THE IGA WITH REGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Intergovernmental Agreement “Agreement” with
Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA/Valley Metro). The purpose of the
Amendment is to extend the Master Intergovernmental Agreement and the Annual Service
Agreement term and increase the funding available for services.
This amendment changes the term of the Master Intergovernmental Agreement as
addressed in Section 3 to be effective until June 30, 2020.
The amendment modifies the following in Attachment A (Annual Service Agreement):
• The Annual Service Agreement program schedule is amended to end June 30, 2020.
• Section 3.1 of the Annual Service Agreement is amended to “The County shall provide up
to $1,189,609 transportation costs for services provided in the unincorporated areas of the
County to individuals for paratransit and RideChoice services.”
• Section 3.2 of the Annual Service Agreement is amended to “Funding availability shall be
from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020.”
• Section 3.6.1 of the Annual Service Agreement is amended to “RPTA shall submit a final
invoice no later than August 15, 2020.”

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 30 of 50
• The attached Schedule A amends and adds to Schedule A entered into October 1, 2019.
• The attached Schedule B amends and adds to Schedule B entered into October 1, 2019.
The Amendment shall be effective upon approval and signature by the Parties.
The purpose of the Agreement is for the provision of transportation service delivery for
eligible Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) individuals that reside in unincorporated
areas of the County. The County shall reimburse RPTA for transportation services provided
to eligible residents.
Funding for this Agreement shall be provided by the Human Services Department
appropriated General Funds. Supervisory District: All (C-22-20-007-3-01)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
26. SUBMIT APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDING TO ARIZONA LOTTERY FUNDS FOR
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
Request approval to submit a grant application on behalf of Maricopa County to the
Arizona Lottery Funds (ALF) for FY2020 transportation services for individuals with
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) certifications. Transportation services shall be
provided by Valley Metro and administered by Public Transportation Authority (RPTA).
Grant application requested amount is $818,075, all funds shall be utilized for the provision
of transportation services and do not contain Administrative or Indirect funds.
Also request authorization for the Chairman to sign all documents related to the grant
funding and authorize the Chief Financial Officer to sign financial documents related to this
grant.
The Human Services Department shall submit the grant application on behalf of the
County.
If the grant application is approved and Maricopa County is awarded the ALF grant, funds
shall be held in trust and RPTA shall administer the grant funds on behalf of the County as
they oversee the delivery of transportation services provided by Valley Metro.
Valley Metro (VM) has traditionally provided supplemental funds from ADA Public
Transportation Funds (PTF) and Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) 5310 funds.
Supervisory District: All (C-22-20-025-G-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 31 of 50
Medical Examiner - Médico Forense
27. IGA WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA FOR DATA SHARING
Approve an Intergovernmental Agreement between The Board of Trustees of the University
of Alabama (for and on behalf of its constituent institution, The University of Alabama) and
Maricopa County through the Office of the Medical Examiner. This agreement is non-
financial. It is effective when signed by the Board of Supervisors and expires five years
later.
The IGA allows MCOME to share information with University of Alabama for purposes of
contributing to understanding risk factors for suicide of veterans. (C-29-20-006-3-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Procurement Services - Servicios de Adquisiciones
28. ONLINE PUBLIC RECORDS AND LEGAL RESEARCH SERVICES (14077-CI)
Approve the renewal of the following contracts for legal research services. The County
Attorney, Public Defender’s Office, Office of Legal Defender, Office of Legal Advocacy,
Sheriff’s Office, Public Health and other County departments use this contract for legal
searches.
This Contract contains options for contract renewals and is being renewed for a term of five
years, thru February 28, 2025. The remaining MA balance in Advantage 3x of $495,992.08
is not sufficient to cover anticipated spend thru the end of this new term, therefore
requesting an additional $1,500,000.00 be added to the Contract award value.
Thomson Reuters West
RELX Inc. DBA: LexisNexis, a Division of RELS Inc (C-73-15-023-7-01)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Public Health - Salud Pública
29. AFFILIATION AGREEMENT WITH ROSEWOOD CENTERS FOR EATING DISORDERS
Approve the Affiliation Agreement with Rosewood Centers for Eating Disorders to provide
clinical nutrition training experience for graduate students in the dietetic internship. The
agreement is non-financial, and the term is to be from November 1, 2019 through June 30,
2024.
As a part of its established accredited dietetic internship program, the Department of Public
Health seeks to provide its dietetic interns with a broad and diverse practicum experience.
This agreement with RCED will allow dietetic interns to continue to receive approved
practicum experience in clinical nutrition. Supervised by RCED registered dietitians in
RCED facilities, interns would continue to be responsible to Public Health. This agreement
is non-financial, and does not affect the County general fund. (C-86-20-033-3-00)

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 32 of 50
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
30. NOTICE OF AWARD FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON
BEHALF OF UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOR THE ARIZONA PREVENTION
RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT
Accept and approve a Notice of Award of grant funds from the Arizona Board of Regents
for and on behalf of the University of Arizona (U of A) and Maricopa County by and through
its Department of Public Health (MCDPH). The purpose of this grant is to provide funding
for applied public health research to address chronic disease health disparities. By
engaging in and implementing community clinical linkages to ensure that people with or at
high risk of chronic diseases have access to the resources they need to prevent, delay, or
manage chronic conditions once they occur.
The budget period for this award is September 30, 2019 through September 29, 2020 for
the total not to exceed amount of $146,000. The term of the agreement retroactively begins
September 30, 2019 through September 29, 2024.
This is a new grant and its reoccurrence is not known. It was a competitive grant
opportunity and there is no cash or in-kind match required. Should the grant cease, on-
going contributions should not be required. This is not a mandated service but provides a
benefit to our citizens by providing connections between community and clinical sectors to
prevent chronic disease and improve population health.
The grant allows for the full indirect rate of 19.2%. Indirect cost is estimated to be $23,517
all of which is recoverable. Departmental indirect rates are reestablished at the beginning
of each fiscal year and the future indirect rates will be collected at the corresponding rates.
Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitation, and therefore, expenditure of the funds is not prohibited by the budget law.
Approval of this action does not alter the budget constraining the expenditure of local
revenues duly adopted by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17105. (C-86-20-034-G-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
31. DIETETIC INTERNSHIP AFFILIATION AGREEMENT WITH STEPHANIE PAVER RD,
LLC
Approve the Affiliation Agreement with Stephanie Paver RD, LLC, to provide clinical
nutrition training experience for graduate students in the dietetic internship program. The
agreement is non-financial and the term is from December 1, 2019 through June 30, 2024.
As a part of its established accredited dietetic internship program, the Department of Public
Health seeks to provide its dietetic interns with a broad and diverse practicum experience.
This agreement with Stephanie Paver will allow dietetic interns to continue to receive
approved practicum experience in clinical nutrition. This agreement is non-financial, and
does not affect the County general fund. (C-86-20-035-3-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 33 of 50
Transportation – Transportación
32. NEW TRAFFIC CONTROLS ON WOODSIDE DRIVE
Approve new traffic controls (All Way Stop) on unincorporated right of way at the following
location.
1. An All Way Stop (from a Two Way north / south Stop) at Woodside Drive and 138th
Avenue. (This Partially rescinds the Through Street Resolution on Woodside Drive dated
April 05, 1995).
This agenda item is the result of a Traffic Engineering safety study conducted by MCDOT.
After evaluating current traffic volumes, accident records and sight distance it was
determined that warrants were met for a multi-way stop. Supervisory District No. 4 (C-64-
20-131-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
33. NEW TRAFFIC CONTROLS ON BRUNER ROAD
Approve new traffic controls (Stop Signs) on unincorporated right of way at the following
location.
1. All Traffic to stop before entering or crossing a THROUGH STREET within the
prescribed limits of: Bruner Road from 100’ north of Old US Highway 80 to 100’ south of
Lower River Road.
This new traffic control is the result of an engineering study conducted to identify locations
warranting the installation of Stop Signs on county roadways. Supervisory District No. 4 (C-
64-20-132-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
34. IGA WITH THE TOWN OF GILBERT FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR LINDSAY ROAD
FROM SPUR ROAD TO LAYTON LAKES BOULEVARD SOUTH
Approve the Intergovernmental Agreement between Maricopa County and the Town of
Gilbert for the design and construction of Lindsay Road from Spur Road to Layton Lakes
Boulevard South.
Under this Intergovernmental Agreement, Maricopa County and the Town of Gilbert will
widen Lindsay Road to four lanes with a striped median, sidewalk, and drainage
improvements and install a traffic signal. The road is currently owned and operated by
Maricopa County.
The Town of Gilbert will lead the Project and annex the Project prior to the start of
construction of the Project.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 34 of 50
The estimated cost to complete construction of the Project is $2,820,500 with the County’s
cost share contribution is estimated to be $1,410,250. Funds will be budgeted in FY2020
Transportation Department (640) Transportation Capital Project Fund (234) Transportation
System Management Project, Sub-Project TT0630.
The terms of the agreement are in effect as of Board of Supervisors approval and shall
remain in full force and effect until all stipulations have been satisfied, except that it may be
amended upon written agreement by all parties. Supervisory District No. 1 (C-64-20-133-
M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
35. CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT WITH COMBS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAY WIDENING
Approve Change Order No. 9 to delete those items and quantities of work in Contract No.
2018-034 with Combs Construction, Inc. that are located on MC 85 west of 91st Ave., and
on 91st Ave., both north and south of MC 85. These items of work in the quantities to be
deleted represent $4,670,670.77 (Four Million, Six Hundred and Seventy Thousand, Six
Hundred and Seventy Dollars, and Seventy-Seven Cents). This deletion results in a
substantial change in the scope of work and therefore requires Board of Supervisors
approval.
Contract No. 2018-034 was executed on September 12, 2018 in the amount of
$20,069,707.53 for improvement on MC 85 between 75th Ave. and the 95th Ave.
alignment, and along 83rd and 91st Aves., both north and south of their intersection with
MC 85. The work being requested for removal from this contract were contingent upon the
completion of the USA Fee Land/Easement land exchange with the Bureau of Reclamation
(BOR) necessary for relocation of Salt River Project (SRP) irrigation pipeline infrastructure
that is included in the contract. This was anticipated to be no later than December 31,
2018, but is not completed to date, nor will it be prior to expiration of the Contract in July
2020. Supervisory District No. 5 (C-64-18-007-5-02)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
36. CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT 2018-034 WITH COMBS CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, INC.
Approve Change Order No. 10 to Contract 2018-034 with Combs Construction Company,
Inc. in the amount of $667,717 to allow MCDOT to compensate Contractor for inefficiencies
and other financial damages incurred during the first 10 months (through 11/18/2019) of
contract time due to unanticipated utility conflicts.
Contract No. 2018-034 was executed on September 12, 2018 in the amount of
$20,069,707.53 for improvement on MC 85 between 75th Ave. and the 95th Ave.
alignment, and along 83rd and 91st Aves., both north and south of their intersection with
MC 85. The majority of the roadway work during this time period was predicated on the
successful relocation of SRP Irrigation improvements within the Right-of-Way and
dedicated easements. During the replacement of the existing SRPI infrastructure to the
new locations, numerous conflicts with other utilities were encountered which were
unexpected at the locations and depths encountered, and subsequently brought about

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 35 of 50
delays and/or less efficient production while these conflicts were mitigated. The Contractor
itemized their losses, presented to MCDOT prior to and at a 12/18/2019 meeting,
concluding with MCDOT management offering this settlement. Supervisory District No. 5
(C-64-18-007-5-01)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
37. EASEMENT, RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTS
Approve easements, right-of-way documents, and relocation assistance for highway and public
purposes as authorized by road file resolutions or previous Board of Supervisors’ action. The
list is on file with the Clerk of the Board's Office and retained in accordance with LAPR
retention guidelines. (C-06-20-406-7-00)
A. D23777 Project #: TT0011 – Van Buren Street – State Land Department
(DS) State of Arizona – Right of Way – R/W #: 16-120653-00 –
Maricopa County.
B. DD-10870 Project #: TT0008 – Pinnacle Peak Road – Assessor’s Parcel #:
(DS) Formerly 503-57-008-A – Warranty Deed – City of Surprise for
the sum of $10.00.
C. DD-10870 Project #: TT0008 – Pinnacle Peak Road – Assessor’s Parcel #:
(DS) Formerly 503-57-008-A – Purchase Agreement – City of
Surprise.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - JUNTA DE SUPERVISORES
Board of Supervisors - Junta de Supervisores
38. APPOINTMENT TO THE CORRECTIONS OFFICER RETIREMENT PLAN (CORP)
LOCAL BOARD AND TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT SYSTEM
(PSPRS) LOCAL BOARDS
Pursuant to A.R.S. 38-847 and 38-893, approve the appointment of Larry Pickard as a
Citizen Member, to the following local boards:
Corrections Officer Retirement Plan (CORP) Local Board
County Attorney Investigator's Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS) Local
Board
Sheriff's Office Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS) Local Board
The term of the appointment is effective February 4, 2020, when Larry Pickard was elected
Chairman of the Merit Systems Commission, through December 31, 2020. (C-06-20-385-7-
00)

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 36 of 50
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
39. APPOINTMENT TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
Approve the appointment of Shelby Scharbach to the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Commission, representing Supervisorial District 1. The term of the appointment will be
effective February 26, 2020 through December 31, 2021. (C-06-20-392-7-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
SETTING OF HEARINGS - CONFIGURACIÓN DE AUDIENCIAS
~All hearings will be held at 9:30 am, 205 W. Jefferson, Phoenix, unless otherwise noted~
~Todas las audiciones será tenidas a las 9:30 de la Mañana, 205 W. Jefferson, Phoenix,
amenos que de otromodo notado~
Clerk of the Board - Secretaria de la Junta
40. SETTING OF HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED TEMPLE ANNEX IRRIGATION WATER
DELIVERY DISTRICT IMPACT STATEMENT
1. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 48-261 and § 48-263, set a hearing date to receive the impact
statement for the proposed Temple Annex Irrigation Water Delivery District. The hearing
date is set for Wednesday, March 25, 2020 at 9:30 a.m., 205 W. Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ
85003.
2. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 48-261(C), approve a bond in the amount of $250 to be filed with
the Board by the persons proposing the district to cover cost incurred by the County.
The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall post a notice of the hearing in at least three
conspicuous public places in the area of the proposed district and shall publish a notice
twice in a daily newspaper at least ten days before the hearing. A notice of hearing will be
sent to each property owner within the proposed district boundaries.
At the hearing on March 25, 2020, the Board will hear those who appear for and against
the proposed district and shall determine whether the district will promote public health,
comfort, convenience, necessity, or welfare. If the Board of Supervisors determines that
the public health, comfort, convenience, necessity, or welfare will be promoted, it shall
approve the impact statement and authorize the persons proposing the district to circulate
petitions within the following proposed boundaries of the district:
Lots 3 through 7, and the North 28 feet of Lot 8 all in Block 1, of NIELSON PLACE, a
Subdivision of part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of Section 26, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base
and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of
Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 39 of Maps, Page 42.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 37 of 50
TOGETHER WITH
The East half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 26, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian,
of Maricopa County, Arizona;
TOGETHER WITH
The West half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 1
North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, of Maricopa County,
Arizona;
TOGETHER WITH
The West half of the West half of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of Section 26, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base
and Meridian, of Maricopa County, Arizona;
TOGETHER WITH
The West 134.68 feet of Tract 3, of TEMPLE ACRES, a Subdivision of part of the East Half
of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 1 North, Range
5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the
Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 17 of Maps,
Page 42; EXCEPT the North 150 feet thereof;
TOGETHER WITH
The West 60 feet of Tract 9, of TEMPLE ACRES, a Subdivision of part of the East Half of
the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 1 North, Range 5
East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the
Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 17 of Maps,
Page 42;
TOGETHER WITH
The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26,
Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, of
Maricopa County, Arizona;
EXCEPTING Therefrom any portion lying within VILLALEAH, a Subdivision of part of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt
River Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County
Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 445 of Maps, Page 12; AND
EXCEPT any part of the West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 1 North, Range 5
East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian not already EXCEPTED out by said
Book 445 of Maps, Page 12; AND
EXCEPT the North 12.50 Feet of the West half of the South half of the Southeast Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 1 North, Range
5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian; AND
EXCEPT the West 210 feet of the South 155 feet half of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 1 North, Range 5
East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 38 of 50
TOGETHER WITH
The Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26,
Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, of
Maricopa County, Arizona;
EXCEPT any part lying within the South 127 feet thereof. (Supervisorial District 2) (C-06-
20-382-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Planning and Development - Planificación y Desarrollo
41. PLANNING & ZONING SETTING OF HEARINGS
Schedule the following items for public hearing at the March 11, 2020 Board Meeting:
Z20109003 – Sun Streams IV Solar Project - ZC with overlay – Dist. 5 (C-44-20-073-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Transportation – Transportación
42. ROAD FILE NO. A672
Set a hearing for March 25, 2020 for Road File No. A672 to Open and Declare the
following described alignments into the County Transportation System.
The Department of Transportation Director has recommended that Desert Hills (from 17th
Avenue to 13th Avenue) and Honda Bow Road (from 9th Avenue to 7th Avenue) be
declared and accepted into the MCDOT road system. The resolution is on file with the
Clerk of the Board's Office and retained in accordance with LAPR retention guidelines.
(General Vicinity: Desert Hills Drive and 17th Avenue in Unincorporated Maricopa County.
Supervisory District No. 3) (C-64-20-130-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
43. ROAD FILE NO. 5964
Set a hearing for March 25, 2020 for Road File No. 5964 to Open and Declare the following
described alignments into the County Transportation System.
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation has inspected and approved/accepted
the developer constructed roads within the Zanjero Trails, Phase 1 recorded in MCR 1289-
04 and has recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt the resolution accepting the
roads in the subdivision into the County road system. The resolution is on file with the Clerk
of the Board's Office and retained in accordance with LAPR retention guidelines.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 39 of 50
(General Vicinity: Camelback Road and Perryville Road, lying within Supervisor District 4,
in an unincorporated area.) (C-64-20-134-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
CONSENT AGENDA - AGENDA DE CONSIENTA
Clerk of the Board - Secretaria de la Junta
44. ACCOUNT OF ACTIVITIES REPORT
Pursuant to A.R.S. 11-664, accept the Account of Activities Report for October 31, 2019 -
February 18, 2020, submitted by William D. Wiley, Acting Administrator of the Maricopa
County Assessor's Office. The report is on file in the Clerk of the Board's Office and
retained in accordance with Arizona State Library Archives and Public Record (ASLAPR)
approved retention schedule. (C-06-20-404-7-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
45. CANVASS OF ELECTIONS
Pursuant to A.R.S. §16-642(B), accept the canvasses of elections submitted by New
Magma Irrigation & Drainage District (Supervisorial District 1) Electrical District 6
(Supervisorial Districts 1 & 2). List is on file in the Clerk of the Board’s Office and retained
in accordance with ASLAPR approved retention schedule. (C-06-20-400-7-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
46. DUPLICATE WARRANTS
Pursuant to A.R.S §11-632, approve and ratify the issuance of duplicate warrants to
replace county warrants and school warrants which were either lost or stolen. Necessary
affidavits have been filed with the Board. (C-06-20-396-7-00)
Name Warrant No Amount Dept/School
Planning &
Sunlore Homes, Inc. 3010046750 4,023.36
Development
JS Waltz Construction LLC 3700254547 28,081.00 Higley Unified
Ana Maria Garcia Ramos 3700274639 46.69 Fowler Elementary
Kassandra Sue Ament 3700266566 80.68 Queen Creek Unified
Meritain Health 3700249760 65.00 West-MEC
Robyn Gaines 3700251928 473.77 Avondale Elementary
Monique Cotton 3010052259 5379.74 County Attorney
Uni First Corp 3700230134 73.24 Queen Creek Unified
Uni First Corp 3700161410 69.57 Queen Creek Unified

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 40 of 50
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
47. DONATIONS
In accordance with County Policy A2508, accept the monthly donation report received from
Animal Care and Control for January 2020, for a Cash Value of $57,922.29 and Non Cash
Value of $4,289.27. (C-06-20-397-7-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
48. SECURED/UNSECURED TAX ROLL CORRECTIONS
Pursuant to A.R.S. §§42-15155, 16002, 16215, 16258, and 19118, approve requests from
the Assessor for corrections of the Secured Tax Rolls Resolutions, as attached and on file
in the Clerk of the Board's office in accordance with LAPR retention guidelines. This
reflects actual tax dollar corrections to the County tax rolls due to administrative corrections
of the Assessor and as a result of property tax appeals. (C-06-20-394-7-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
~ Supervisor Gates declared a conflict of interest and left the dais ~
49. SETTLEMENT/RESOLUTION OF PROPERTY TAX CASES AND CLAIMS
Pursuant to A.R.S. §§42-16201 through 16258, approve the settlement/resolution of tax
cases and claims as listed. (C-06-20-402-7-00)
2019: ST2019-000012; ST2019-000155; ST2019-000273; ST2019-000275; ST2019-
000542;
2019/2020: ST2019-000057; ST2019-000152; ST2019-000153;
2020: ST2019-000021; ST2019-000148; ST2019-000150; ST2019-000151; ST219-
000154; ST2019-000166; ST2019-000171; ST2019-000274; ST2019-000304; TX2019-
000612; TX2019-001653;
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Hickman, Gallardo
Recused: Gates
~ Supervisor Gates returned to the dais ~

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 41 of 50
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADDENDUM
ADÉNDUM DE LA JUNTA DE SUPERVISORES
Board of Supervisors
A-1. RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF
MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Adopt a resolution pursuant to the terms of the Housing Authority of Maricopa County and
Board of Supervisors' intergovernmental agreement and resolutions adopted on December
11, 2019, appointing the members of the Housing Authority of Maricopa County Board of
Commissioners and designating the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Commission. The
initial appointments shall have staggered terms of one, two and three years. Subsequent
appointments shall be for four years.
The appointments shall be as follows:
District 1, Kathy DiNolfi, term: from date of appointment for three years, expiring on
February 25, 2023.
District 2, Marc Grayson, term: from date of appointment for two years, expiring on
February 25, 2022.
District 3, Jake Hinman, term: from date of appointment for three years, expiring on
February 25, 2023.
District 4, Mickey Lund, term: from date of appointment for two years, expiring on February
25, 2022.
District 5, Gina Ramos Montes, term: from date of appointment for one year, expiring
February 25, 2021.
Chairman and Vice Chairman positions shall be appointed annually for one-year terms.
Designate and appoint Jake Hinman as Chairman, term expiring February 25, 2021. Also,
designate and appoint Kathy DiNolfi as Vice Chairman, term to expire February 25, 2021.
(C-06-20-403-7-00)
Motion to approve by Resolution by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
(The approved Resolution follows here and is on file in the Clerk of the Board's office in
accordance with LAPR retention guidelines.)
RESOLUTION C-06-20-403-7-00
RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
WHEREAS, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors ("Board of Supervisors") passed
and adopted Resolution C-06-20-272-M-OO on December 11, 2019 ("Restructuring
Resolution"), which restructured the Housing Authority of Maricopa County ("Housing
Authority"); and
WHEREAS, the Restructuring Resolution adopted a new intergovernmental agreement
("Restructuring IGA") between Maricopa County and the Housing Authority and
dissolved the Housing Authority's Advisory Committee; and

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 42 of 50
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority passed and adopted Resolution 19-025 on
December 11, 2019 ("HAMC Resolution"), which approved the Restructuring IGA; and
WHEREAS, under the Restructuring Resolution and the HAMC Resolution, the Board of
Supervisors has continued to serve as the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners
pending appointment by the Board of Supervisors, by subsequent resolution, of five of
the initial members of the Board of Commissioners and designation of the
commissioners who shall be chairman and vice-chairman in accordance with the
Restructuring IGA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors, in accordance with the Restructuring IGA, Restructuring Resolution, and
HAMC Resolution, appoints the following persons as the initial Supervisor-appointed
members of the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners for the following staggered
terms:
District 1: Appointee: Kathy DiNolfi
Term: Three years, expiring on February 25, 2023,
District 2: Appointee: Marc Grayson
Term: Two years, expiring on February 25, 2022,
District 3: Appointee: Jake Hinman
Term: Three years, expiring on February 25, 2023,
District 4: Appointee: Mickey Lund
Term: Two years, expiring on February 25, 2022, and
District 5: Appointee: Gina Ramos Montes
Term: One year, expiring on February 25, 2021.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, in
accordance with the Restructuring IGA, Restructuring Resolution, and HAMC
Resolution, designates Jake Hinman as the initial Chairman of the Housing Authority
Board of Commissioners for a term expiring on February 25, 2021, and designates
Kathy DiNolfi as the initial Vice Chairman of the Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners for a term expiring on February 25, 2021.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, in accordance with the Restructuring IGA,
Restructuring Resolution, and HAMC Resolution, the above newly-appointed members
of the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners shall, within sixty days after passage
and adoption of this resolution, prepare proposed new bylaws of the Housing Authority
that are consistent with the terms of the Restructuring IGA and the Restructuring
Resolution and send them to the Board of Supervisors for approval or revision.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, upon approval or revision of the proposed new
bylaws by the Board of Supervisors, the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners
shall promptly adopt the new bylaws as approved or revised by the Board of
Supervisors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County, Arizona, on
February 26, 2020.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MARICOPA COUNTY
/s/ Clint Hickman, Chairman

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 43 of 50
ATTEST:
/s/ Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form as within the powers and authority of Maricopa County under the
laws of the State of Arizona.
/s/ David W. Krula, Deputy County Attorney
Prior to consideration of item A-2, the Clerk indicated that there were amendments to
this item. Ms. McCarroll read the amendments which are indicated below with new
language indicated by underlining and language to be removed indicated by strike-
through.
A-2. APPOINTMENT OF JERRY SPEARS AS ADMINISTRATOR AND KATHLEEN KOLM AS
INTERIM ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SELF-INSURED RISK TRUST FUND
Appoint Jerry Spears, Risk Management Director, as the Administrator of the Self-Insured
Risk Trust Fund effective February 20, 2020 Kathleen Kolm, Risk Management Deputy
Director, as the Interim Administrator of the Self-Insured Risk Trust Fund pursuant to
A.R.S. §11-981(B)(1). Ms. Kolm He is currently licensed pursuant to A.R.S. title 20, chapter
2, article 3 or 9 by the Arizona Department of Insurance and as such is Ms. Kolm will be
authorized by the Board to perform all the functions and duties of the Administrator of the
Self-Insured Risk Trust Fund as outlined in the Revised Restated Declaration of Trust for
Maricopa County, Arizona, dated January 14, 2015.
In addition, appoint Jerry Spears, Risk Management Director, as the Administrator of the
Self-Insured Risk Trust Fund upon the written notification of his licensure by the Arizona
Department of Insurance. Such notification shall be filed of record at the Clerk of the Board,
at which time Ms. Kolm shall return from special duty as Interim Administrator to Risk
Management, Deputy Director. (C-06-20-399-M-00)
Motion to approve as amended by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Assessor
A-3. CHIEF DEPUTY ASSESSOR APPOINTMENT
Pursuant to ARS 11-409, approve the appointment of Dawn Buckland as Chief Deputy
Assessor and set her salary at $74.52 effective February 26, 2020.
This item was heard in executive session on February 24, 2020. (C-06-20-412-M-00)
Supervisor Chucri welcomed Ms. Buckland noting that she was a talented administrator.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
A-4. CERTIFICATION OF MAILING OF THE 2021 PROPERTY VALUATION NOTICES
Pursuant to A.R.S. §42-15101, receive and place on file the Notice from the Maricopa
County Assessor's Office certifying that the 2021 Property Valuation Notices were mailed
via USPS on February 21, 2020. (C-06-20-411-7-00)

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 44 of 50
Motion to approve by Supervisor Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
Risk Management
A-5. IN RE MATTER OF MEMBER OF STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, JUAN M. MARTINEZ
PDJ2019-9008
Authorize the Risk Trust to pay up to $120,000 in legal fees regarding the above case.
This matter was heard in executive session on Feb. 24, 2020. (C-19-20-044-M-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Sellers
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman
Nays: Gallardo
MEETING RECESSED
Chairman Hickman recessed the Board of Supervisors to convene as the Board of Directors of
various special districts.
MEETING RECONVENED
Chairman Hickman reconvened the Board of Supervisors.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC AND SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS
LLAMADO AL PUBLICO Y EL RESUMEN DE TEMAS DE ACTUALIDAD
50. Public comment on matters pertaining to Maricopa County government. Please limit
comments to two minutes. Note that pursuant to Arizona Open Meeting Law, Board
members may not discuss matters raised under this public comment portion of the meeting;
however, an individual Board member may respond to criticism made by those who have
addressed the Board, ask staff to review an issue raised or may ask that the matter be
placed on a future agenda. (Public comment is at the discretion of the Chairman.)
Comentarios del público sobre las materias relacionadas con el gobierno del Condado de
Maricopa. Por favor límite comentarios a dos minutos. Tenga en cuenta que de conformidad
con el Derecho de Reunión Abierta de Arizona, miembros de la Junta no podrán abordar las
cuestiones planteadas en esta parte de comentario público de la reunión, sin embargo, un
miembro de la Junta individuo puede responder a las críticas de quienes se han ocupado
de la Junta, pida al personal para examinar una cuestión planteada o puede pedir que la
cuestión se incluya en una agenda de futuro. (Comentario público es a discreción del
Presidente.)
The Chairman asked Ms. McCarroll, the Clerk to remind the registered speakers of the
guidelines regarding public comments. The Clerk reminded those in attendance of the
public speaker protocols which included:
 How speakers will be called to the podium
 The 2-minute comment period for each speaker
 A 15-second reminder that the 2-minute limit is approaching
 Board members can only respond to specific person criticisms
 The Board can direct staff to deal with an issue

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 45 of 50
 If the comment involves litigation, the Board cannot respond in this forum but
could set an executive session to discuss the matter with their attorneys
Chairman Hickman read the names of those speakers who did not wish to speak, but
registered either in favor or opposed to item #5 (The Resolution “Declaring Maricopa
County a Second Amendment Preservation County”)
Those in favor:
 Nga Thi Thuy Nguyen
 Joel Jungkas
Those registered opposed:
 Teresa L. Neiberg
 Jessica Catlett
Chairman Hickman then called on those who had registered to speak on the same
agenda item:
Gary Larson: Mr. Larson spoke in favor of the resolution. He commented that he felt it
was important to keep the freedom citizens have in America and not do anything that
would infringe on those right. Also important to “maintain the freedoms we have.”
People who might be unstable should be dealt with. That issue should be dealt with,
that but not make it apply to all others.
Daniel McCarthy: Mr. McCarthy spoke in favor of the resolution. stated that he is
currently running for a seat in the U.S. Senate. He said that constituents are probably
calling regarding this matter because they are concerned about possible “overstepping”
by state and federal government bodies. He commented that he felt the resolution had
been “watered down,” and aske the Board to consider reviewing other ordinances
similar to what Yavapai and Mohave counties are doing. He stated that he felt this was
a God-given right and that no government body had the right to limit “bearing arms.” He
asked the Board to consider taking a second look and possibly doing a stronger
resolution.
Geraldine Hills, founder and president of the organization: Arizonans for Gun Safety,
and a member of other gun safety organizations: Ms. Hills spoke in opposition to the
resolution. She commented that she felt there were unintended consequences in the
resolution. She stated the “illegal nullification movement” is being pushed by the
“extremist gun lobby.” She felt that this action could hinder events that would consider
coming to Maricopa County. She felt that the Board should be concentrating more on
the upcoming elections and making sure that all have the right to vote in those elections.
Laura Hudson: Ms. Hudson registered in opposition to the resolution. Ms. Hudson
stated that she is a volunteer for “Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America,”
also stating that she is a “gun violence survivor.” She stated that “Moms Demand
Action” supports the Second Amendment. She felt that the resolution as passed leaves
a decision about “what is Constitutional up to a personal opinion, undermines the rule of
law, and sets a dangerous precedent.” She felt this statements in this resolution makes
the citizen “less safe.” She stated that law enforcement officers need to enforcement
gun safety laws that have been shown to be constitutional. She also stated that she felt
this resolution puts constituents’ “lives at risk.”
Garrich McFadden: Mr. McFadden registered in opposition to the resolution. Mr.
McFadden began by stating that he appreciated the amendment to the resolution. He
asked if members had reached out to members of the Black community, noting that
there are 30 handgun deaths each day in America, and 15 of those are Black people.
He stated that he too, as an attorney, takes an oath to defend the Constitution, but felt it

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 46 of 50
is important to note that he felt Black persons were more often adversely affected by
gun violence. It is important to make sure that everyone is protected. He felt it is
important to reach out to members of various communities in addition to those persons
who contacted the Supervisors.
Randy Miller: Mr. Miller registered in favor of the resolution. Mr. Miller stated that he is
the Director for the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association. Mr. Miller
stated that he was surprised to hear speakers using the words, “illegal nullification.” He
stated that in the Arizona Constitution there was a process for nullification if a law or
process is illegal. He did not feel that there was anything illegal about the resolution.
He commented that all elected officials take the oath of office. He stated that a
Supreme Court ruling in an issued opinion, not law; legislators make law. Mr. Miller cited
sections of the United States and Arizona Constitutions stating that political power is
inherent in the people, and that the power “comes from the consent of the governed.”
He also commented that statements about the militia are found elsewhere, not in the
second amendment.
Jerry Sheridan: Mr. Sheridan registered in favor of the resolution. He stated that he is a
Republican candidate for Sheriff in Maricopa County. He felt he had a unique
perspective on this issue as he had spent approximately 18 years of his 38-year career
in the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office as a patrol officer. Mr. Sheridan commented that
the second amendment is a guarantee to all citizens given by the founding fathers of
their right to carry a firearm. His experience was that all citizens in either rural or urban
areas of the county had this right and it was not to be infringed upon.
Marie Thearle: Ms. Thearle registered in opposition to the resolution. Ms. Thearle also
registered as a member of “Moms Demand Action.” She stated that she has no issue
with the second amendment or the right to own firearms. She commented that she was
thankful the Board removed the last section in the resolution. Ms. Thearle commented
that ASU research stated that 80% of Arizonans support common sense gun laws,
especially background checks. She also stated that firearm-related deaths are the
second most common cause of death of children in Arizona. Ms. Thearle urged the
Board in the future to take the time to fully discuss complicated issues such as this one.
For example, she felt it would be important for the Board to pass a resolution regarding
the safe storage of firearms.
Bob McWhirter: Mr. McWhirter registered in opposition to the resolution. Mr. McWhirter
first wanted to clarify the exact motion of the Board on this matter. Attorney Andrea
Cummings clarified that the motion and second was to approve the resolution with the
final “be it further resolved” paragraph stricken from the resolution. Mr. McWhirter then
stated that he was a candidate for Maricopa County Attorney, and that part of that job is
to make people safe from crime. However, he felt that this resolution did not do that.
He also stated that he was a Constitutional historian and author. He has written
extensively about the Bill of Rights and especially about the Second Amendment. He
agreed with Supervisor Gallardo regarding his comments about the Heller decision.
Mr. McWhirter stated that he agreed that citizens have the right to bear arms, but as in
all rights, they are subject to limitation and he provided an example. However, he felt
that this resolution does not make people safer. As an example, he talked about an
officer of the law having to go into a situation where everyone was armed. He stated
that there are individual rights, but they must be balanced by other people’s rights. He
felt that this resolution was only “eye candy for an extremist position.”
Edith Smith: Ms. Smith registered in opposition to the resolution. Ms. Smith stated that
she supports the 2nd amendment, however, this none of the amendments are unlimited.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 47 of 50
She felt that the Board’s approval of the resolution was a response to an
unsubstantiated fear that guns would be removed. She also stated that she felt the
Board’s responsibility was to calm people’s fears. She also expressed her
disappointment that the Board did not consult with lawyers first or allow people to
express their thoughts or concerns prior to the Board’s vote.
Nancy Doyle: Ms. Doyle registered to speak in the public comment section of the
meeting. Ms. Doyle wished to speak regarding issues related to Animal Care and
Control. She stated that she had been a volunteer there for 4½ years. Ms. Doyle
referenced the issue of air conditioners for the animal shelter. She stated that at the
time, ½ of the new coolers had been installed, but, although the remainder of the
coolers had been purchased and paid for, there would need to be a delay in installing
them so that the whole system would not have to be taken down during installation.
Later she received a report that there was an engineering issue causing the delay in the
installation. She asked the Board to press for a resolve to this issue and get the units
installed before the summer heat.
51. SUPERVISORS'/COUNTY MANAGER'S SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS
Resumen de temas de actualidad de los Supervisores/Administrador del Condado
Supervisor Gallardo congratulated and presented a five-year pin to Christina Arzaga-
Willams, District 5 Chief of Staff. He said the pin marks five years that she has been
with the County working within District 5. He noted his appreciation to Ms. Arzaga-
Williams and thanked her for her continued years of hard work. He also commented
that he had coaxed Mr. Arzaga-Williams out of retirement to come to the County and
was so thankful for all of her work on a number of issues.
Supervisor Gates introduced John Buneta as the new District 3 staff member. He gave
a brief synopsis of Mr. Buneta’s work history including the time he had worked in New
York during the time of the 9/11 attacks. Supervisor Gates noted that Mr. Buneta has a
flag that flew over Ground Zero and that he has allowed City of Phoenix to use it several
times for their 9/11 ceremonies. Most recently, Mr. Buneta comes to the County from
Banner Health. He welcomed him to the Office.
Supervisor Sellers noted several meetings he had attending including testifying at the
Legislative Transportation Committee regarding a statewide transportation system. He
also attended the East Valley Partnership where the attendees toured the Boeing facility
in Mesa. Last Thursday he attended the Chandler state of the City meeting and then
the next morning drove to Bisbee to attend his last official meeting as a Board Member
of the State Transportation Committee. The new appointee is Jen Daniels, the Mayor of
Gilbert. Later, he attended the Chandler Men of Action banquet where his friend Victor
Hardy received the Man of the Year award. Supervisor Sellers also noted that he had
attended the Tempe City Council Chamber rededication celebrating the remodel of the
50-year old building. He commented that this coming Saturday would be a community
clean-up event in Sun Lakes.
Supervisor Chucri also complemented Christina Arzaga-Williams on her 5-year
anniversary with the County and noted that he owed some pins to his staff also. He
thanked Supervisor Sellers on his work with MAG and all his work on a number of
transportation issues. Supervisor Chucri also commented on the new ITR (Intake-
Transfer-Release). A tour of the building showed the thought and planning that went
into the placement of the court areas, general holding areas and the secure holding
areas, and it can truly be labeled “state of the art.” He thanked Sheriff Penzone, Reid
Spaulding and Joy Rich for their planning and subsequent work on the plans and the
buildings.

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 48 of 50
Chairman Hickman commented that he had only a few minutes until he needed to be a
MAG meeting. He stated that he had met with the Mayors of El Mirage, Surprise and
Youngtown and other business and community leaders at the recent Westmarc meeting
regarding needs in the West Valley. Although the needs are many, the list needs to be
prioritized to fit the available funds. He also complimented Ms. Arzaga-Williams on her
county anniversary.
MEETING ADJOURNED
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.
______________________________
Clint Hickman, Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
____________________________
Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 49 of 50
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ADDENDUM
ADÉNDUM DE DISTRITO DE CONTROL DE INUNDACIONES
The Board of Directors of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona,
convened in Formal Session at 9:30 AM on Wednesday, February 26, 2020, in the Supervisors'
Auditorium, 205 W. Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Clint
Hickman, Chairman, District 4; Jack Sellers, Vice Chairman, District 1; Steve Chucri, District 2; Bill
Gates, District 3; Steve Gallardo, District 5. Also present: Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board; Maria
Ceaglske, Minutes Coordinator; Joy Rich, County Manager; and Andrea Cummings, Legal Counsel.
FA-1. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT - INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT ALONG 92ND STREET
Authorize the County Attorney to file a declaratory judgment action seeking to confirm the
existence of an ingress/egress easement along 92nd Street, north of McDowell Road so as
to ensure access to APN 219-49-002R which is owned by the Flood Control District of
Maricopa County. (C-69-20-021-S-00)
Motion to approve by Director Sellers, seconded by Director Gallardo
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
MEETING ADJOURNED
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.
______________________________
Clint Hickman, Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
____________________________
Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board

Formal Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
Page 50 of 50
LIBRARY DISTRICT AGENDA
AGENDA DEL DISTRITO DE BIBLIOTECA
The Board of Directors of the Library District of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in
Formal Session at 9:30 AM on Wednesday, February 26, 2020, in the Supervisors' Auditorium, 205
W. Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ 85003, with the following members present: Clint Hickman, Chairman,
District 4; Jack Sellers, Vice Chairman, District 1; Steve Chucri, District 2; Bill Gates, District 3;
Steve Gallardo, District 5. Also present: Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board; Maria Ceaglske,
Minutes Coordinator; Joy Rich, County Manager; and Andrea Cummings, Legal Counsel.
L-1. DONATIONS
In accordance with County Policy A2508, please accept the monthly donation report
received from Library District (MCLD) for January 2020, in the amount of $5,637.75 (non-
cash value). (C-06-20-389-7-00)
Motion to approve by Director Gallardo, seconded by Director Chucri
Ayes: Sellers, Chucri, Gates, Hickman, Gallardo
MEETING ADJOURNED
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.
______________________________
Clint Hickman, Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
____________________________
Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board