PROJECT SPECIFIC FEDERAL CONTRACT 2021-016 TY LIN INTERNATIONAL COMBINED TT372.PDF

Federal
CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTRACT
BETWEEN
MARICOPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL
FOR
PROJECT NO. TT372
NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE
FINAL DESIGN SERVICES
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
TRACS NO. T0233 01D/03D
FEDERAL AID NO. MMA-0(281)D
C-64-

CONSULTANT SERVICES
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I SERVICES OF CONSULTANT ......................................................................................................... 5
SECTION II PERIOD OF SERVICE ................................................................................................................... 5
SECTION III PAYMENTS TO THE CONSULTANT ............................................................................................. 6
SECTION IV PROMT PAY LEGISLATION .......................................................................................................... 6
SECTION V DISPUTE ESCALATION ................................................................................................................. 7
SECTION VI ARBITRATION ........................................................................................................................... 8
SECTION VII COUNTY’S RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................................. 8
SECTION VIII ALTERATION IN SCOPE OF WORK........................................................................................... 9
SECTION IX RECORDS RETENTION, MAINTENANCE AND AUDIT ............................................................... 9
SECTION X PROJECT COMPLETION ............................................................................................................. 10
SECTION XI SUSPENSION OF WORK ............................................................................................................ 10
SECTION XII TERMINATION ...................................................................................................................... 10
SECTION XIII OWNERSHIP OF DATA ............................................................................................................. 10
SECTION XIV COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS ...................................................................................................... 11
SECTION XV GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................. 12
SECTION XVI SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS ................................................................................................. 14
SECTION XVII NO KICK-BACK CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................... 14
SECTION XVIII ANTI-DISCRIMINATION PROVISION ..................................................................................... 14
SECTION XIX INDEMNIFICATION .................................................................................................................... 14
SECTION XX ANTI-TRUST VIOLATIONS ........................................................................................................ 15
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 2

SECTION XXI PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION ................................. 15
SECTION XXII IMPROPER EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY ................................................................................ 15
SECTION XXIII CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ..................................................................................................... 15
SECTION XXIV ORGANIZATION EMPLOYMENT DISCLAIMER .................................................................... 16
SECTION XXV FEDERAL DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION ........................................................................ 16
SECTION XXVI SUBCONTRACTS ................................................................................................................... 17
SECTION XXVII CONTINUING OBLIGATION .................................................................................................. 17
SECTION XXVIII NAME CHANGE, MERGER, ACQUISITION, CONSOLIDATION AND/OR
TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP ........................................................................................................................... 17
SECTION XXIX ANTI-LOBBYING ..................................................................................................................... 19
SECTION XXX FINAL/INCURRED COST AUDIT ............................................................................................. 19
SECTION XXXI REVIEW AND INSPECTIONS ................................................................................................. 20
SECTION XXXII PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT ................................................................................................ 20
SECTION XXXIII NONDISCRIMINATION .......................................................................................................... 20
SECTION XXXIV AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (FOR FEDERAL-AID CONTRACTS) ............................................ 22
SECTION XXXV PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DBE PROVISIONS ................................................................ 23
SECTION XXXVI ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ....................................................................................... 44
SECTION XXXVII ENERGY CONSERVATION ................................................................................................. 44
SECTION XXXVIII PATENTS AND COPYRIGHTS ........................................................................................... 45
SECTION XXXIX FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS ................................................................................... 45
SECTION XL FEDERAL IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT ................................................................ 45
SECTION XLI PANDEMIC CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE .................................................................. 47
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 3

SECTION XLII PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS ....................................................................................... 48
SECTION XLIII CONTRACT COMPLETION .............................................................................................. 48
SECTION XLIV INFLUENCE ....................................................................................................................... 48
SECTION XLV INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... 49
SECTION XLVI TITLE VI .................................................................................................................................. 51
SECTION XLVII FORCE MAJEURE .................................................................................................................. 52
SIGNATURE PAGE ........................................................................................................................................... 53
ATTACHMENT 1 - CONSTRUCTION AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN CONTRACTS
PROMPT PAY AND PAYMENT REPORTING PROVISIONS
ATTACHMENT 2 - APPENDIX C – PART 26 PARTICIPATION BY DBE IN DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS (WITH PART 26 APPENDIX A –
GUIDANCE CONCERNING GOOD FAITH EFFORTS)
ATTACHMENT 3 - APPENDIX D – CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
ATTACHMENT 4 - TITLE VI ASSURANCES
ATTACHMENT 5 - DBE CONSULTANT INTENDED PARTICIPATION AFFIDAVIT
ATTACHMENT 6 - DBE SUBCONSULTANT INTENDED PARTICIPATION AFFIDAVIT
ATTACHMENT 7 - CONSULTANT CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
ATTACHMENT 8 – CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENTS TO DBE FIRMS
ATTACHMENT 9 – CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE
ATTACHMENT 10 – CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
ATTACHMENT 11 – SBE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION REPORTING FORM
EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF WORK
EXHIBIT B – CONSULTANT’S FEE SCHEDULE
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 4

CONSULTANT SERVICES
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
Pursuant to the provisions of the Arizona Revised Statutes § 11-201 the Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors has the authority to enter into contracts.
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the “COUNTY”, is desirous
of having certain professional services performed in connection with Contract No. 2021-016,
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue, Final Design, hereinafter called the “Project”,
and as more fully described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, and in accordance with Exhibit B, Fee
Proposal, attached; and T.Y. Lin International, hereinafter called “CONSULTANT”, with its
principal offices located at 60 East Rio Salado Parkway, Suite 501, Tempe, Arizona 85281,
Telephone No. 480-968-8814, subject to the following terms and conditions:
THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SECTION I—SERVICES OF THE CONSULTANT
The CONSULTANT, under the general supervision of the COUNTY, Transportation Systems
Management Division, Manager, shall prepare studies, reports, surveys, plans, drawings,
specifications, and cost estimates as are necessary for the Project according to the directions and
designated standards of the COUNTY, and in accordance with Exhibit A, Scope of Work. It is
understood and agreed that the COUNTY authorized representative shall be the COUNTY
Transportation Systems Management Division, Manager or his duly authorized representative,
hereinafter called the “Agent”. For purposes of this contract, the Agent’s duly authorized
representative shall be the Project Manager and he/she shall be the sole contact for administering
this contract.
The CONSULTANT shall meet periodically with the Agent so as to keep the COUNTY informed of
the progress of the work in accordance with the schedule defined in Exhibit A, Scope of Work.
The CONSULTANT shall promptly advise the Agent of any factors which develop during the
Project that would likely result in construction or design costs in excess of budgetary constraints.
SECTION II—PERIOD OF SERVICE
The CONSULTANT shall complete all work for TT0372, Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th
Avenue, Final Design in accordance with the time requirements provided in Exhibit A, Section A,
Scope of Work, within One Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Eight (1,888) Calendar Days after
receipt of the Notice to Proceed. Should extension of this contract period be necessary, and any
such extension(s) continue the date of contract performance for a time period of more than one (1)
year from the original date of contract expiration, adjustment(s) of the CONSULTANT’s fee(s) may,
upon agreement by both the COUNTY and the CONSULTANT, be made in accordance with the
Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers, Western Division, published by the U.S. Department
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 5

of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, using the published edition coinciding with the initial contract
expiration date. Any such fee adjustment shall only apply to the extended contract time period.
SECTION III—PAYMENTS TO THE CONSULTANT
The CONSULTANT shall be paid for work under this contract in accordance with the Scope of
Work a Cost Plus Fixed Fee Not to Exceed (CPFF-NTE amount of THREE MILLION TWO
HUNDRED ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND NO CENTS
($3,201,750.00), plus any adjustments that have been approved in writing in accordance with the
Maricopa County Procurement Code. However, the COUNTY does not guarantee either a
minimum or maximum fee under this contract, and CONSULTANT, in accepting this contract, does
not expect the payment of either a minimum or maximum fee. For not-to-exceed contract
payments will be made for the actual hours worked and actual expenses incurred as provided in
Exhibit B, Consultant’s Fee Schedule.
The final invoice shall be paid to the CONSULTANT, as applicable, within forty-five (45) calendar
days after:
A. final completion of all work per Exhibit A, Scope of Work,
B. acceptance of the work by the COUNTY,
C. final completion of all work per Exhibit A, Scope of Work,
D. acceptance of the work by the COUNTY,
E. the COUNTY’s receipt of the fully executed “Certificate of Performance” form.
SECTION IV - PROMPT PAY LEGISLATION (A.R.S. §34-221)
If satisfactory progress is being made, the contractor will receive a payment based on the amount
of work completed. Progress payments may be made bythe LPA/ Subrecipient Procurement Office
to the contractor on the basis of an approved estimate of the work performed during a preceding
period of time. The progress payments shall be paid on or before 14 days after the estimate of the
work is approved. The estimate of the work shall be deemed received by the LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office on submission to the person designated by the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement
Office for the submission, review or approval of the estimate of the work. The LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office by mutual agreement may make progress payments on contracts of less than
90 days and shall make monthly progress payments on all other contracts. Payment to the
contractor on the basis of a duly certified and approved estimate of the work performed during the
preceding calendar month under the contract may include payment for material and equipment.
An estimate of the work submitted shall be deemed approved and certified for payment after seven
days from the date of submission unless before that time the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office
or Designee prepares and issues a specific written finding setting forth those items in detail in the
estimate of the work that are not approved for payment under the contract. The contractor shall
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 6

work with the LPA/Subrecipient or the LPA/Subrecipient Designee to finalize monthly estimate. The
progress payments shall be paid on or before 14 days after the estimate of the work is certified and
approved in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 34-221.
The contractor shall pay to the contractor's subcontractors or material suppliers and each
subcontractor shall pay to the subcontractor's subcontractor or material supplier, within seven days
of receipt of each progress payment the respectiveamounts allowed the contractor or subcontractor
on account of the work performed bythe subcontractors, to the extent of each subcontractor's
interest, except that no contract for construction services may materially alter the rights of any
contractor, subcontractor ormaterial supplier to receive prompt and timely payment.
A subcontractor may notify the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office in writing requesting that the
subcontractor be notified by the Subrecipient Procurement Office in writing within five days from
payment of each progress payment made to the contractor.If unsatisfactory progress has not been
made on the project, MCDOT may, at its sole option, refuse to make progress payment(s) of such
sums, which MCDOT considers necessary. This provision shall not limit MCDOT’s rights to
terminate the Contract for default.
The CONSULTANT shall not withhold the Subconsultant’s payment if MCDOT has paid the full
value of services rendered. Failure by the CONSULTANT to invoice MCDOT in accordance with
the terms of this Contract and/or pay its Subconsultants in accordance with the Arizona Prompt
Pay Law is a material breach of this Contract. MCDOT reserves the right to request that
Consultant provides proof of payment to its Subconsultants.
The CONSULTANT shall be found to be in breach of this Contract if it executes subcontract
agreements with Subconsultants, DBE and non-DBE, which materially change the Prompt Pay
requirement. This action may result in termination of the Contract, or any other such remedy
as deemed appropriate by MCDOT.
SECTION V - DISPUTE ESCALATION
The following dispute escalation levels shall be utilized to resolve disputes during the course of this
Contract. The following dispute escalation levels shall be utilized in the event the MCDOT PM,
CONSULTANT PM or Contracts Specialist are unable to agree on the scope, level of effort, cost or
any other issues related to this Contract. It is the intent of the COUNTY to resolve disputes at the
lowest level possible. If agreement cannot be reached at that level, then the matter is escalated to
the next higher level of management. Failure to agree at any level constitutes escalation to the next
level.
Failure by the CONSULTANT to utilize the escalation process shall constitute a waiver of any
claims for additional compensation or any other relief.
The following table depicts the dispute resolution escalation levels for Contract issues:
Level MCDOT CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT
1 Project Manager Project Manager Contract Services
2 Division Manager Project Principal Finance Services
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 7

Project Manager Project Manager Division Manager
Contract Services
County Engineer
3 Division Manager Project Principal Chief Procurement Officer
Project Manager
The decision of the Chief Procurement Officer is final.
SECTION VI - ARBITRATION
The parties agree to use arbitration, after exhausting applicable administrative reviews, to resolve
disputes arising out of this agreement where the sole relief sought is monetary damages of
$500,000 or less, exclusive of interest and costs.
The arbitration shall be submitted under the relevant rules of the American Arbitration Association
(AAA) in effect as of the date of the demand for arbitration. The matter disputed shall be
submitted to an arbitrator mutually selected by MCDOT and the CONSULTANT.
SECTION VII—THE COUNTY’s RESPONSIBILITIES
The COUNTY will furnish the CONSULTANT, at no cost to the CONSULTANT, the following
information or services for this Project:
A. One copy of on-hand maps, records, survey ties, benchmarks, or other data pertinent to the
Project. This does not, however, relieve the CONSULTANT of the responsibility of searching
records for additional information, for requesting specific information, or for verification of that
information provided. The COUNTY does not warrant the accuracy or comprehensiveness of
any such information.
B. All available information and data relative to policies, standards, criteria, and studies, etc.
impacting the Project as identified by the CONSULTANT.
C. Available staff for consultation with the CONSULTANT during the performance of studies and
plan development in order to identify the problems, needs, and other functional aspects of the
Project.
Prompt examination of documents submitted by the CONSULTANT and rendering of decisions
pertaining thereto in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the work by the
CONSULTANT. The COUNTY will keep the CONSULTANT advised concerning the progress of
the COUNTY’s review of work
SECTION VIII—ALTERATION IN SCOPE OF WORK
This contract may be amended by mutual agreement of the COUNTY and the CONSULTANT.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 8

Any alteration in the Scope of Work that will result in a substantial change in the nature of the
Project so as to materially increase or decrease the contract fee will require negotiation of an
amendment to the contract to be executed by the COUNTY and the CONSULTANT. No work shall
commence on the change until the contract amendment has been approved by the COUNTY and
the Agent has notified the CONSULTANT to proceed. It is distinctly understood and agreed that
no claim for extra work performed or materials furnished by the CONSULTANT will be allowed by
the COUNTY except as provided herein, nor shall the CONSULTANT do any work or furnish any
materials not covered by this agreement unless such work is first authorized in writing by the
COUNTY in accordance with the Maricopa County Procurement Code. Any such work or materials
furnished by the CONSULTANT without such written authorization first being given shall be at
CONSULTANT’s own risk, cost, and expense. The CONSULTANT hereby agrees to make no
claim for such work or materials furnished without such written authorization.
SECTION IX—RECORDS, RETENTION, MAINTNANCE AND AUDIT
A. Pursuant to A.R.S. §35-214, the CONSULTANT and its Subconsultant(s) shall keep and
maintain all books, papers, records, accounting records, files, accounts, expenditure
records, reports, cost proposals with backup data and all other such materials related to the
Contract and other related project(s). The CONSULTANT shall make all such materials
related to the project(s) available at any reasonable time and place during the term of the
Contract and for five (5) years from the date the Initial Closeout Letter is sent to the
CONSULTANT after MCDOT indicates that work on the Contract has been completed to
the satisfaction of MCDOT (Contract Status Form). All Documents shall be retained for
auditing, inspection and copying upon the COUNTY’s or at FHWA’s request, or any other
authorized representative of the Federal Government.
B. Pursuant to A.R.S. §35-215, the CONSULTANT and its Subconsultant(s) with intent to
defraud, deceive, improperly influence, obstruct or impair an audit being conducted or
about to be conducted in relation to any Contract or subcontract with the COUNTY is guilty
of a Class 5 Felony.
C. In case of an audit and the CONSULTANT has failed to retain records in accordance with
the applicable Contract provision, it shall be presumed that the documents would not have
supported the CONSULTANT’s position. Therefore, failure to retain such records shall
result in the CONSULTANT being required to reimburse MCDOT for unsupported costs.
The CONSULTANT may also be disqualified from submitting future SOQ proposals.
D. Upon completion and final closeout of the Contract, physical/paper or electronic
Contract files and any supporting materials shall be maintained in accordance with
MCDOT and State Record Retention Center Records Retention/Destruction Policy and
Schedules.
SECTION X—PROJECT COMPLETION
If, during the course of this contract, situations beyond the control and not the result of delay
attributable to CONSULTANT arise which prevent completion within the allotted time, the Agent
may grant an extension.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 9

SECTION XI - SUSPENSION OF WORK
Work on this Contract may be suspended by written order at MCDOT’s sole discretion. The
CONSULTANT is not entitled to any compensation when work is suspended.
SECTION XII—TERMINATION
The COUNTY may terminate this contract at any time upon reimbursement to the CONSULTANT
of expenses that include reasonable charges for time and material for the percentage of work
satisfactorily completed and provided to the COUNTY.
The COUNTY reserves the rights to postpone, terminate, or abandon this contract for the
CONSULTANT’s failure to complete the Project on time or failure to comply with the provisions of
the contract. The COUNTY also reserves the right to terminate any or all parts of this contract for
its own convenience as the COUNTY may determine at its sole discretion.
The COUNTY hereby gives notice that pursuant to A.R.S. § 38-511 “A” this contract may be
canceled without penalty or further obligation within three (3) years after execution if any person
significantly involved in initiating, negotiating, securing, drafting, or creating a contract on behalf of
the COUNTY is, at any time while the contract or any extension of the contract is in effect, an
employee or agent of any other party to the contract in any capacity or a consultant to any other
party of the contract with respect to the subject matter of the contract. Cancellation under this
section shall be effective when written notice from the Transportation Director is received by all of
the parties to the contract. In addition, the COUNTY may recoup any fee or commission paid or
due to any person significantly involved in initiating, negotiating, securing, drafting, or creating the
contract on behalf of the COUNTY from any other party to the contract arising as a result of the
contract.
The CONSULTANT may terminate this contract in the event of nonpayment of fees as specified in
SECTION III, PAYMENTS TO THE CONSULTANT.
SECTION XIII—OWNERSHIP OF DATA
A. The CONSULTANT agrees to maintain (in sufficient detail as shall properly reflect all
work done and results achieved in the performance of this Contract) tracings, plans,
specifications and maps, basic survey notes and sketches, books, records, reports,
research notes, charts, graphs, comments, computations, analyses, recordings,
photographs, computer programs and documentation thereof, and other graphic or written
data generated in connection with the work required in the Contract; all such information
and documentation to be termed "Data" under this Contract.
B. All Data procured hereunder for the work funded by MCDOT shall become the property of
MCDOT and delivered to MCDOT upon request, and shall not be used or released by the
CONSULTANT or any other person except with the prior written approval by the COUNTY;
provided that the CONSULTANT shall not be required to retain any Data not requested by
MCDOT within five (5) years from the date of final payment to the Consultant hereunder;
and provided further that until such delivery to MCDOT, the CONSULTANT agrees to
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 10

permit MCDOT and FHWA representatives to examine and review at reasonable times all
Data still in the possession of the CONSULTANT.
C. All services, information, computer program elements, reports and other deliverables which
may be patented or copyrighted and created under this Contract are the property of the
COUNTY and shall not be used or released by the CONSULTANT or any other person
except with the prior written approval by the COUNTY.
SECTION XIV—COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The CONSULTANT is required to comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, local ordinances
and regulations. The CONSULTANT’s signature on this contract certifies compliance with the
provisions of the I-9 requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 for all
personnel that the CONSULTANT and any sub-consultants employ to complete any Project. It is
understood that the COUNTY shall conduct itself in accordance with the provisions of the Maricopa
County Procurement Code.
The CONSULTANT warrants that it is in compliance with A.R.S. §41-4401 and further
acknowledges:
(1) That the CONSULTANT and its sub-consultants, if any, warrant their compliance with all
federal immigration laws and regulations that relate to their employees and their
compliance with A.R.S. §23-214, subsection A; After December 31, 2007, every
employer, after hiring an employee, shall verify the employment eligibility of the
employee through the e-verify program and shall keep a record of the verification for the
duration of the employee’s employment or at least three years, whichever is longer.
(2) That a breach of a warranty under subsection 1 above, shall be deemed a material
breach of the contract that is subject to penalties up to and including termination of the
contracts;
(3) That the contracting government entity retains the legal right to inspect the papers of any
CONSULTANT or sub-consultant employee who works on the contract to ensure that
the CONSULTANT or sub-consultant is complying with the warranty provided under
subsection 1 above and that the CONSULTANT agrees to make all papers and
employment records of said employee(s) available during normal working hours in order
to facilitate such an inspection.
(4) That nothing herein shall make any CONSULTANT or sub-consultant an agent or
employee of the contracting government entity.
Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension:
(1) The undersigned (authorized official signing for the CONSULTANT) certifies to the best of
his or her knowledge and belief, that the CONSULTANT, defined as the primary
participant in accordance with 45 CFR Part 76, and its principals:
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 11

(a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible,
or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal Department or
agency;
(b) have not within 3-year period preceding this contract been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in
connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State
or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State
antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or
destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government
entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in
paragraph (2) of this certification; and
(d) have not within a 3-year period preceding this contract had one or more public
transaction (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause of default.
(2) Should the CONSULTANT not be able to provide this certification, an explanation as to
why should be attached to the Contact.
(3) The CONSULTANT agrees to include, without modification, this clause in all lower tier
covered transactions (i.e. transactions with subcontractors) and in all solicitations for lower
tier covered transactions related to this contract.
SECTION XV—GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. The CONSULTANT shall furnish to the COUNTY for approval, the names of its key
employees, and of its sub-consultants and their key employees, to be used on this Project prior
to beginning the work under this contract. Any subsequent changes are subject to the written
approval of the COUNTY.
B. The CONSULTANT shall perform, with its own firm, work amounting to fifty percent (50%) or
more of the total amount of the contract value. Any deviation may be approved, in writing, at
the discretion of the Agent.
C. The failure of either party to enforce any of the provisions of this contract or to require
performance of the other party of any of the provisions hereof shall not be construed to be a
waiver of such provisions, nor shall it affect the validity of this contract or any part thereof, or
the right of either party to thereafter enforce each and every provision.
D. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the cost of any additional design, field layout,
testing, construction and supervision necessary to correct those errors or omissions
attributable to the CONSULTANT, and for any damage incurred by the COUNTY as a result of
additional construction costs caused by such consultant errors or omissions.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 12

E. The fact that the COUNTY has accepted or approved the CONSULTANT’s work shall in no
way relieve the CONSULTANT’s responsibility.
F. It is mutually understood and agreed that this contract shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Arizona, both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity, or
judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this contract, or any provision thereof, shall be
instituted only in the courts of the State of Arizona.
G. When this contract requires the CONSULTANT to study specific geographic areas of Maricopa
County the CONSULTANT agrees during the term of this contract and any extensions thereof
that CONSULTANT will not perform similar services for any clients other than the COUNTY
within that specific geographic area without the written authorization and approval of the
Transportation Director of the COUNTY.
H. The CONSULTANT agrees that it, its principals, employees, sub-consultants, agents and
assigns, shall not accept employment as consultants, expert witnesses or otherwise in any
pending or contemplated litigation against the COUNTY during the term of this contract and
any extensions thereof without the written authorization and approval of the Transportation
Director of the COUNTY.
I. The CONSULTANT agrees that it, its principals, employees, sub-consultants, agents and
assigns, shall not accept employment as consultants, expert witnesses or otherwise in any
future litigation against the COUNTY in regard to the subject matter of this contract without the
written authorization and approval of the Transportation Director of the COUNTY.
J. It is understood that the COUNTY shall have the right to seek and obtain in any court of
competent jurisdiction an injunction to restrain a violation or alleged violation by the
CONSULTANT, its principals, employees, sub-consultants, agents or assigns, of the
provisions of G., H., and I. of this section or of the provisions of B. of Section IX, and the right
of action for full damages at law, in addition to any other remedies provided by this contract. In
no case shall a waiver by the COUNTY of the right to seek relief under this provision constitute
a waiver of any other or further violation.
K. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate stormwater quality best management practices (BMPs)
in the design of the project and comply with the Maricopa County Stormwater Quality
Management and Discharge Control Regulation, the Maricopa County Drainage Policies and
Standards, and the Maricopa County Drainage Regulations, using guidance from the Maricopa
County Drainage Design Manual, Vol. III, Erosion Control.
L. Written Certification Pursuant to A.R.S. § 35-393.01. If VENDOR engages in for-profit activity
and has 10 or more employees, and if this Agreement has a value of $100,000 or more,
VENDOR certifies it is not currently engaged in, and agrees for the duration of this Agreement
to not engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel. This certification does not apply to
a boycott prohibited by 50 U.S.C. § 4842 or a regulation issued pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 4842..
SECTION XVI—SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 13

This contract shall not be assigned by either party without prior written approval of the other except
that the CONSULTANT may use in the performance of this contract without prior approval of the
COUNTY, personnel or services of its related entities and affiliated companies as if they were an
integral part of the CONSULTANT; and it shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
SECTION XVII—NO KICK-BACK CERTIFICATION
The CONSULTANT warrants that no person has been employed or retained to solicit or secure
this contract upon any agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or
contingent fee; and that no member of the Board of Supervisors or any employee of the COUNTY
has any interest, financially or otherwise, in the CONSULTANT’s firm.
For breach or violation of this warranty, the COUNTY shall have the right to annul this contract
without liability, or at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration, the full
amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee.
SECTION XVIII—ANTI-DISCRIMINATION PROVISION
The COUNTY will endeavor to ensure in every way possible that small business enterprises shall
have every opportunity to participate in providing professional services, purchased goods, and
contractual services to the COUNTY without being discriminated against on the grounds of race,
religion, gender, age, disability, or national origin.
A DBE Goal of 3.75% has been established for this contract. Prime consultants are encouraged to
obtain DBE participation above and beyond the goal on this contract. DBE goal attainment will be
monitored to help ensure that overall DBE goal is met on the contract. DBE availability is based on
the Arizona UCP directory, which can be searched by specialty and/or NAICS code at
http://www.azdbe.org
The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment
because of race, religion, gender, age, disability, or national origin, and further agrees not to
engage in any unlawful employment practices. The CONSULTANT further agrees to insert the
foregoing provisions in all subcontracts hereunder.
SECTION XIX—INDEMNIFICATION
To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
COUNTY, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials, and employees from and against
all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, but
only to the extent caused by the negligence, reckless or intentional wrongful conduct of the
CONSULTANT or others persons employed or used by the CONSULTANT in the performance of
the contract or subcontract. “Other persons employed or used” means a subconsultant to a
CONSULTANT or design professional in any tier, or any other person or entity who performs work
or design professional services, or provides labor, services, materials or equipment in connection
with the contract.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 14

The amount and type of insurance coverage requirements set forth herein will in no way be
construed as limiting the scope of the indemnity in this paragraph. The scope of this
indemnification does not extend to the sole negligence of COUNTY.
SECTION XX - ANTI-TRUST VIOLATIONS
The CONSULTANT and the COUNTY recognize that in actual economic practice, overcharges
resulting from anti-trust violations are in fact borne by Purchaser or ultimate user which in this
case, the COUNTY. Therefore, the CONSULTANT, acting as a vendor, hereby assigns to the
COUNTY any and all claims for such overcharges.
SECTION XXI - PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
The CONSULTANT shall comply with the “Rules of Professional Conduct” provision pursuant to
A.A.C. R4-30-301, which is incorporated herein by reference and hereby made a part of this
Contract.
The CONSULTANT shall comply with the “Registration as an Architect, Assayer, Engineer,
Geologist, Landscape Architect, or Land Surveyor” provision pursuant to A.A.C. R4-30-201,
which is incorporated herein by reference and hereby made a part of this Contract.
SECTION XXII - IMPROPER EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY
It is further understood and agreed that the CONSULTANT shall not, in any way, exercise any
portion of the authority or powers of the COUNTY, and shall not make a contract or
commitment, or in any way represent itself as an agent of the COUNTY beyond the scope of
this Contract unless expressly authorized, in writing, by the COUNTY.
SECTION XXIII - CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The CONSULTANT shall not engage the services on this contract of any present or former
COUNTY employee who was involved as a decision maker in the selection or approval processes
or who negotiated and/or approved billings or contract modifications for this contract.
The CONSULTANT agrees that no public or private interest exists and none shall be acquired
directly or indirectly which would conflict in any manner with the performance of this contract.
SECTION XXIV - ORGANIZATION EMPLOYMENT DISCLAIMER
A. This Contract is not intended to constitute, create, give to, or otherwise recognize a joint
venture agreement or relationship, partnership, or formal business organization of any
kind, and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be only those expressly set forth
in this Contract.
B. The parties agree that no persons supplied by the CONSULTANT in the performance
of CONSULTANT obligations under the Contract are considered to be COUNTY
employees. The Consultant shall have total responsibility for all salaries, wages,
bonuses, retirement, withholdings, workmen's compensation, occupational disease
compensation, unemployment compensation, other employee benefits and all taxes and
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 15

premiums appurtenant thereto concerning such persons, and shall save and hold the
COUNTY harmless with respect thereto.
SECTION XXV - FEDERAL DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
A. By signature on this Contract, the CONSULTANT certifies its compliance, and the
compliance of its Subconsultants or subcontractors, present or future, by stating that any
person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, principal
investor, project director, manager, auditor, or any position of authority involving
federal funds:
1. Is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination
of ineligibility by any Federal Agency;
2. Does not have a proposed debarment pending;
3. Has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded or determined ineligible by
any Federal Agency within the past three (3) years; and
4. Has not been indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered against the
firm by a court of competent jurisdiction in any matter involving fraud or official
misconduct within the past three (3) years as specified by Code of Federal
Regulations 49 CFR paragraph 29.305(a).
B. Where the CONSULTANT or its Subconsultant is unable to certify to the statement in
Section a.1. above, the CONSULTANT or its Subconsultant shall be declared ineligible to
enter into Contract or participate in the project.
C. Where the CONSULTANT or Subconsultant is unable to certify to any of the statements
as listed in Sections a.2., a.3., or a.4., above, the CONSULTANT or its Subconsultant
shall submit a written explanation to the COUNTY. The certification or explanation shall
be considered in connection with theCOUNTY’s determination whether to enter into
Contract.
A. The CONSULTANT shall provide immediate written notice to the COUNTY if, at any time,
the CONSULTANT or its Subconsultant, learn that its Debarment and Suspension
certification has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
SECTION XXVI - SUBCONTRACTS
The CONSULTANT agrees to execute a written contract with all Sub-consultants for work to be
completed under this contract. The executed contract shall include Sub-Consultant’s Scope of
Work and all the Uniform Terms and Conditions set forth in this contract.
The CONSULTANT shall provide electronic copies of signed subcontract agreements with all Sub-
consultants to ADOT Business Engagement and Compliance Officer (BECO)) by uploading them
to the BECO online DBE Contract & Labor Compliance Management System
(https://adot.dbesystem.com). Subcontract agreements must include all required assurances and
required clauses as outlined in this contract. Each agreement and required attachment must be
dated and signed by the Sub-consultant in order for the subcontract to be considered valid.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 16

The CONSULTANT shall be in breach of this contract if the CONSULTANT materially modifies the
federal regulations and State statutes in its subcontract agreements terms and conditions with its
Subconsultants. Deviations from the terms of this contract may result in termination of the
contract, or any other such remedy as deemed appropriate by the COUNTY.
SECTION XXVII - CONTINUING OBLIGATION
The CONSULTANT agrees that if due to death or any other occurrence it becomes impossible
for any principal or employee of the CONSULTANT to render the services required under this
Contract, neither the CONSULTANT nor the surviving principals shall be relieved of any
obligation to render complete performance. However, in such event, the COUNTY may
terminate this Contract if it considers the death or incapacity of such principal or employee to
be a loss of such magnitude as to (1) affect the CONSULTANT’s ability to satisfactorily
complete the performance of this Contract, or (2) materially affect the evaluation of the
CONSULTANT’s qualifications.
SECTION XXVIII - NAME CHANGE, MERGER, ACQUISITION, CONSOLIDATION AND/OR
TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP
A. In cases where a firm changes its name, acquires, or merges with another company, the
firm under Contract with MCDOT shall notify MCDOT of name or ownership changes
within 10 business days from the date when the name or ownership change is legally
signed/approved before the new CONSULTANT begins any work on acquired firm’s
contract(s). The CONSULTANT changing its name due to merger, acquisition,
consolidation and/or transfer of ownership shall be responsible for fulfilling all obligations,
liabilities, and contract terms/conditions for all MCDOT Contracts of the acquired firm.
The new/acquiring firm shall provide MCDOT with the required information to approve the
name change, including but not limited to the following:
1. A letter, on company letterhead, indicating the new name and reason for the change.
The letter shall also include:
i. Effective date of the change.
ii. List of active and pending closeout MCDOT Contracts affected by the change
with contract description. Indicate which contract(s) the firm served as a
CONSULTANT or Subconsultant.
iii. A statement certifying that the new/acquiring CONSULTANT shall assume
all obligations and liabilities set forth in the respective contracts for all listed
contracts between the new/acquiring CONSULTANT and MCDOT.
iv. A statement certifying that no changes have been made in the Key Personnel
responsible for the affected contracts. If a Key Personnel change occurs resulting
from the merger, acquisition, consolidation and/or transfers of ownership, the
CONSULTANT shall submit a separate request to obtain MCDOT’s approval for
the Key Personnel change.
2. A copy of Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) or home-state equivalent
Corporation Commission approval documentation of the new/acquiring CONSULTANT
3. Updated professional license(s) of the new/acquiring CONSULTANT
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 17

4. Updated W-9 Form of the new/acquiring CONSULTANT
B. If the acquiring firm is approved by MCDOT to take over the merged or acquired Contracts,
the Contracts shall be modified to include the acquiring firm’s name by a Contract
Modification. The CONSULTANT shall also re- prequalify with ECS under the new
entity/firm name.
C. If a Subconsultant listed in the Contract changes its name due to merger, acquisition,
consolidation and/or transfer of ownership, the Subconsultant shall notify the
Consultant of the name or ownership changes within 10 business days when the name
or ownership change is legally signed/approved before the new/acquiring Subconsultant
begins any work on the acquired Subconsultant contract(s). The CONSULTANT shall
request MCDOT’s written approval within 10 calendar days from the Subconsultant
notification. The name-change request shall include, at a minimum, the following:
1. A letter, on company letterhead, indicating the new Subconsultant(s) name and
reason for the change. The letter shall also include:
i. Effective date of the change
ii. List of active and pending closeout MCDOT Contracts affected by the
change with contract description. Indicate which contract(s) the firm served as a
CONSULTANT or Subconsultant.
iii. A statement certifying that the new/acquiring Subconsultant shall continue to
provide quality work under the Contract
iv. A statement certifying that no changes have been made in the Key Personnel
responsible for the affected contracts. If a Key Personnel change occurs resulting
from the merger, acquisition, consolidation and/or transfers of ownership, the
Subconsultant shall submit a separate request through the CONSULTANT, to
obtain COUNTY’s approval for the Key Personnel change.
2. A copy of the new/acquiring Subconsultant’s ACC or home-state equivalent
Corporation Commission approval documentation related to the change.
SECTION XXIX—ANTI-LOBBYING
CONSULTANT agrees to comply with the provisions of Section 1352 of Title 31, U.S. Code (Public
Law 101.121) as codified in Title 48, Federal Acquisition Regulations Subpart 3.8 and Subpart 52.203-
11. The legislation prohibits federal funds from being expended by a recipient or any lower tier
subrecipients of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement to pay any person for
influencing or attempting to influence a Federal agency or Congress in connection with the award of
any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant or loan, or entering into any cooperative
agreement, including the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal
contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. Disclosure statements shall be provided to the
COUNTY.
CONSULTANT agrees to require all lower tier sub-consultants who have agreements exceeding
$100,000 to complete the Certification of Federal Contracts (ECS Form 90-1) and, when appropriate,
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 18

the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (ECS Form 90-3) prior to execution of the Prime Consultants
Agreement with the COUNTY. Lower tier certifications are to be maintained by CONSULTANT and
shall be retained by CONSULTANT for a period of three (3) years following the completion and
acceptance of the project.
SECTION XXX - FINAL/INCURRED COST AUDIT
a. Final/Incurred Cost Audit (ICA) of the CONSULTANT’s costs may be performed
by MCDOT to determine the Contract costs’ allowability, allocability, and
reasonableness in accordance with the terms of this Contract.
b. A CPA-prepared overhead schedule or a Cognizant Audit Report that meets
ADOT/AASHTO/FHWA guidelines is acceptable for establishing a given year’s
overhead rate with the concurrence of Maricopa County Department of
Transportation (MCDOT).
c. Upon receipt of an ICA draft report, the CONSULTANT has 14 calendar
days to respond to the Incurred Cost Auditor with any disagreements,
questions, or request for additional supporting documentation. A time
extension may be allowed, if requested in writing within the 14-day
timeframe, by the appropriate parties. Disagreements related to the results of
the ICA draft report shall be addressed or resolved with the Incurred Cost
Auditor on or before the date of the formal Exit Conference with the
Incurred Cost Auditor and the CONSULTANT. Non-response to the draft
audit report after the 14-day timeframe and after the Exit Conference will be
deemed by MCDOT as the CONSULTANT’s acceptance of the findings in the
draft report.
d. d. The appeal process for all Audit issues shall remain with MCDOT. The
following table depicts the escalation levels for Audit issues:
Level MCDOT CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT
1 Project Manager Project Manager Contract Services
Division Manager Project Principal Administrative Services
2 Project Manager Project Manager Division Manager
Contract Services
County Engineer
3 Division Manager Project Principal Chief Procurement Officer
Project Manager
The decision of the Chief Procurement Officer is final.
e. MCDOT or the CONSULTANT shall reimburse either party in accordance
with the ICA results. Failure of the CONSULTANT to reimburse MCDOT for
over-billed charges based on the results of the Pre-award Reviews or ICAs
shall result in disqualification of the CONSULTANT.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 19

SECTION XXXI - REVIEWS AND INSPECTIONS
Representatives from the COUNTY and FHWA are authorized to review and inspect the
Contract activities and facilities during the CONSULTANT’s and its Subconsultants normal
business hours.
SECTION XXXII - PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT
Except as otherwise provided in this Contract, computer or other special equipment needed to
fulfill this Contract, shall be purchased through the MCDOT Procurement Group and considered
as MCDOT property. The control, utilization and disposition of property or equipment acquired
using Federal/State funds shall be determined in accordance with the property management
standards set forth in 49 CFR Part 18.
SECTION XXXIII - NONDISCRIMINATION
1. During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its Subconsultants,
assignees and successors shall:
a. Not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex and
shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the performance
of this Contract. Failure by the CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements
is a material breach of this Contract, which may result in the termination of this
Contract, disqualification from proposing on other Contracts or other remedy as
the State deems appropriate.
b. Comply with Executive Order 2009-09, "Prohibition of Discrimination in
Employment by Government contractors and Subcontractors," which is hereby
included in its entirety by reference and considered a part of this Contract.
c. Comply with the provisions of Executive Order 11246, entitled "Equal
Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375, and as
supplemented in Department of Labor Regulations (41 CFR Part 60). Said
provisions are made applicable by reference and are hereinafter considered a
part of this Contract.
d. Post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment,
the following notice:
“It is the policy of this company not to discriminate against any
employee, or applicant for employment, because of race, color, religion,
creed, national origin, sex, age, handicapped, or disabled veterans and
Vietnam era veterans. Such actions shall include, but are not limited to:
employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, or recruitment
advertising; laying-off or termination; rates of pay or other
compensation; and selection for training, and on-the-job training. Also, it
is the policy to insure and maintain a working environment free of
harassment, intimidation and coercion.”
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 20

e. Comply with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted
programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT), 49 CFR
Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the
Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this
Contract.
f. Comply with Appendix A and E of the Maricopa County Department of
Transportation “Title VI/Non-Discrimination Assurances” as found in Attachment 4
of this Contract.
g. Not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the
selection and retention of Subconsultants, including procurement of materials
and leases of equipment. The CONSULTANT shall not participate either
directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of
the Regulations, including employment practices.
h. In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the
CONSULTANT for work to be performed under a subcontract, including
procurement of materials or leases of equipment, notify each potential
Subconsultant or supplier of the CONSULTANT’s obligations under this
Contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the ground of
race, color, or national origin.
i. Provide all information and reports required by the Regulations or directives
issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information and its facilities as may be determined
by the State to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations,
orders and instructions. Where any information required of a CONSULTANT
is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this
information, the CONSULTANT shall so certify to the State as appropriate, and
shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
2. In the event of the CONSULTANT’s noncompliance with the NONDISCRIMINATION
provision (Section XXXIII) of this Contract, the State shall impose such Contract sanctions
as the State or FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including but not limited to:
a. Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under the Contract until the CONSULTANT
complies, and/or;
b. Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the Contract, in whole or in part.
3. The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraph 1.a. through 1.i. in
every subcontract with Subconsultants, DBEs and Non-DBEs, including procurement of
materials and equipment leases, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued
pursuant thereto.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 21

4. The CONSULTANT shall take such action with respect to any Subconsultants or
procurement as the State or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), FHWA and the
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions
including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event the
CONSULTANT becomes involved in or is threatened with litigation with a Subconsultant or
supplier as a result of such direction, the CONSULTANT may request the State to enter
into such litigation to protect the interests of the COUNTY, and in addition, the
CONSULTANT may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the
interests of the United States.
SECTION XXXIV—AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (FOR FEDERAL-AID CONTRACTS)
CONSULTANT shall take the following affirmative action measures when securing supplies,
equipment or services under the terms of this contract:
A. Include qualified firms owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals on
solicitation lists.
B. Assure that firms owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals are solicited
whenever they are potential sources.
C. When economically feasible, divide total requirements into smaller tasks or quantities so as to
permit maximum participation by firms owned by socially and economically disadvantaged
individuals.
D. If requirement permits, establish delivery schedules which will encourage participation by firms
owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.
A. Use the services and assistance of ADOT DBE Supportive Services Program, the Small
Business Administration, the Office of Minority Business Enterprise of the Department of
Commerce and the Community Services Administration as needed.
SECTION XXXV - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DBE PROVISIONS
(LPA PS EPRISE, 6/23/2016)
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES:
1.0 Policy:
The Arizona Department of Transportation (hereinafter the Department) has established a
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program in accordance with the regulations of the U.S.
Department of Transportation (USDOT), 49 CFR Part 26. The Department has received Federal
financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation and as a condition of receiving this
assistance, the Department has signed an assurance that it will comply with 49 CFR Part 26.
It is the policy of the Department to ensure that DBEs, as defined in Part 26, have an equal
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 22

opportunity to receive and participate in USDOT-assisted contracts. It is also the policy of the
Department:
1. To ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of USDOT-assisted contracts;
2. To create a level playing field on which DBEs can compete fairly for USDOT-assisted contracts;
3. To ensure that the DBE program is narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable law;
4. To ensure that only firms that fully meet 49 CFR Part 26 eligibility standards are counted as
DBEs;
5. To help remove barriers to the participation of DBEs in USDOT-assisted contracts;
6. To assist in the development of firms that can compete successfully in the market place outside
the DBE program; and
7. To promote the use of DBEs in all types of federally-assisted contracts and procurement
activities.
It is also the policy of the Department to facilitate and encourage participation of Small Business
Concerns (SBCs), as defined in Subsection 3.0, in USDOT-assisted contracts. The Department
encourages consultants to take reasonable steps to eliminate obstacles to SBCs’ participation and
to utilize SBCs in performing contracts.
Local Public Agencies (LPA) and or Subrecipients of Federal financial assistance will administer
and manage the contracts from advertising, consultant selection, negotiation, contract execution,
processing payment reports and contract modifications, audits, DBE compliance (e.g., reporting
and monitoring) through contract closeout.
2.0 Assurances of Non-Discrimination:
The consultant, subrecipient, or subconsultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex
or national origin in the performance of this contract. The consultant shall carry out applicable
requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts.
Failure by the consultant to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract,
which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the the
LPA/Subrecipient with the Department’s concurrence deems appropriate, which may include, but
are not limited to:
1. Withholding monthly progress payments;
2. Assessing sanctions;
3. Liquidated damages;
4. Disqualifying the consultant from submitting SOQs, or any other forms of proposals, as non-
responsible;
5. Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the Contract, in whole or in part.
The consultant, subrecipient, or subconsultant shall ensure that all subcontract agreements
contain this non-discrimination assurance.
3.0 Definitions:
(A) Commercially Useful Function (CUF): Commercially Useful Function is defined fully in 49
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 23

CFR 26.55, which definition is incorporated herein by reference.
(B) Committed DBE: A DBE that was identified by the consultant, typically on a DBE Affidavit, to
meet an assigned DBE goal as a condition of contract award and performance, and includes any
substitute DBE that has subsequently been committed work to meet the assigned contract goal.
(C) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE): a for-profit small business concern which
meets both of the following requirements:
(1) Is at least 51 percent owned by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged
individuals or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the stock is owned
by one or more such individuals; and,
(2) Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more of the
socially and economically disadvantaged individuals who own it.
(D) NAICS Code: The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is the standard
used by Federal statistical agencies in classifying business establishments for the purpose of
collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. business economy.
(E) Non-DBE: any firm that is not a DBE.
(F) Race-Conscious (RC): a measure or program focused specifically on assisting only DBEs,
including women-owned DBEs.
(G) Race-Neutral (RN): a measure or program used to assist all small businesses. For the
purposes of this part, race-neutral includes gender-neutrality.
(H) Small Business Concern (SBC): a business that meets all of the following conditions:
(1) Operates as a for-profit business registered to do business in Arizona;
(2) Operates a place of business primarily within the U.S., or makes a significant contribution to
the U.S. economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials, or labor;
(3) Is independently owned and operated;
(4) Is not dominant in its field on a national basis; and
(5) Does not have annual gross receipts that exceed the Small Business Administration size
standards average annual income criteria for its primary North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code.
(I) Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Individuals: any individual who is a citizen (or
lawfully admitted permanent resident) of the United States and who is:
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 24

(1) Any individual who is found to be a socially and economically disadvantaged individual on a
case-by-case basis.
(2) Any individual in the following groups, members of which are rebuttably presumed to be
socially and economically disadvantaged:
(i) "Black Americans," which includes persons having origins in any of the Black racial groups of
Africa;
(ii) "Hispanic Americans," which includes persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican,
Central or South American, or other Spanish or Portuguese culture or origin, regardless of race;
(iii) "Native Americans," which includes persons who are enrolled members of federally or State
recognized Indian tribe, Alaskan Natives or Native Hawaiians;
(iv) “Asian-Pacific Americans,” which includes persons whose origins are from Japan, China,
Taiwan, Korea, Burma (Myanmar), Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia (Kampuchea), Thailand, Malaysia,
Indonesia, the Philippines, Brunei, Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands
(Republic of Palau), the Republic of the Northern Marianas Islands, Macao, Fiji, Tonga, Kiribati,
Tuvalu, Nauru, Federated States of Micronesia, or Hong Kong;
(v) “Subcontinent Asian Americans,” which includes persons whose origins are from India,
Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, the Maldives Islands, Nepal or Sri Lanka;
(vi) "Women;"
(vii) Any additional groups whose members are designated as socially and economically
disadvantaged by the Small Business Administration (SBA), at such time as the SBA designation
becomes effective.
4.0 Working with DBEs:
The Department works with DBEs and assists them in their efforts to participate in the highway
construction program. All proposers should contact the Department’s Business Engagement and
Compliance Office (BECO) by phone, through email, or at the address shown below, for assistance
in their efforts to use DBEs in the highway construction industry. BECO contact information is as
follows:
Arizona Department of Transportation
Business Engagement and Compliance Office
1801 W. Jefferson St, Suite 101, Mail Drop 154A
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Phone (602) 712-7761
FAX (602) 712-8429
Email: ContractorCompliance@azdot.gov
Website : www.azdot.gov/bec
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 25

4.01 Mentor-Protège Program
The Department has established a Mentor-Protégé program as an initiative to encourage and
develop disadvantaged businesses in the highway construction industry. The program encourages
prime consultants to provide certain types of assistance to certified DBE subconsultants. ADOT
encourages consultants and certified DBE subconsultants to engage in a Mentor-Protégé
agreement under certain conditions. Such an agreement must be mutually beneficial to both
parties and to ADOT in fulfilling requirements of 49 CFR Part 23. For guidance regarding this
program refer to the Mentor-Protégé Program Guidelines available on the BECO website.
The Mentor-Protégé program is intended to increase legitimate DBE activities and is not intended
to diminish nor circumvent existing DBE rules or regulations.
5.0 Applicability:
The Department has established an overall annual goal for DBE participation on Federal-aid
contracts. The Department intends for the goal to be met with a combination of race conscious
efforts and race neutral efforts. Race conscious participation occurs when the consultant uses a
percentage of DBEs, as defined herein, to meet the contract-specified goal. Race neutral efforts
are those that are, or can be, used to assist all small businesses or increase opportunities for all
small businesses. The regulation, 49 CFR 26, defines race neutral as when a DBE wins a prime
contract through customary competitive procurement procedures or is awarded a subcontract on a
prime contract that does not carry a DBE contract goal.
The consultant shall meet the goal specified herein with DBEs, or establish that it was unable to
meet the goal despite making good faith efforts to do so. Prime consultants are encouraged to
obtain DBE participation above and beyond any goals that may be set for this project.
The DBE provisions are applicable to all consultants including DBE consultants.
6.0 Certification and Registration:
6.01 DBE Certification:
Certification as a DBE shall be predicated on:
(1) The completion and execution of an application for certification as a "Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise."
(2) The submission of documents pertaining to the firm(s) as stated in the application(s), including
but not limited to a statement of social disadvantage and a personal financial statement.
(3) The submission of any additional information which the Department or the applicable Arizona
Unified Certification (UCP) agency may require to determine the firm's eligibility to participate in the
DBE program.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 26

(4) The information obtained during the on-site visits to the offices of the firm and to active job-
sites.
Applications for certification may be filed online with the Department or the applicable UCP agency
at any time through the Arizona Unified Transportation Registration and Certification System (AZ
UTRACS) website at http://www.azutracs.com.
DBE firms and firms seeking DBE certification shall cooperate fully with requests for information
relevant to the certification process. Failure or refusal to provide such information is a ground for
denial or removal of certification.
ADOT is a member of the AZ Unified Certification Program (AZUCP). Only DBE firms that are
certified by the AZUCP are eligible for credit on ADOT projects. A list of DBE firms certified by
AZUCP is available on the internet at http://www.azutracs.com. The list will indicate contact
information and specialty for each DBE firm, and may be sorted in a variety of ways. However,
ADOT does not guarantee the accuracy and/or completeness of this information, nor does ADOT
represent that any licenses or registrations are appropriate for the work to be done.
The Department’s certification of a DBE is not a representation of qualifications and/or abilities nor
does it mean that a DBE firm is guaranteed or entitled to receive or be awarded a contract. Being
certified simply means that a firm has met the criteria for DBE certification as outlined in 49 CFR
Part 26. The consultant bears all risks of ensuring that DBE firms selected by the consultant are
able to perform the work.
6.02 SBC Registration:
To comply with 49 CFR Part 26.39, ADOT’s DBE Program incorporates contracting requirements
to facilitate participation by Small Business Concerns (SBCs) in federally assisted contracts. SBCs
are for-profit businesses authorized to do businesses in Arizona that meet the Small Business
Administration (SBA) size standards for average annual revenue criteria for its primary North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code
While the SBC component of the DBE program does not require utilization of goals on projects,
ADOT and the LPA/Subrecipient strongly encourages consultants to utilize small businesses that
are registered in AZ UTRACS on their contracts, in addition to DBEs meeting the certification
requirement. The consultant may use the AZ UTRACS website to search for certified DBEs and
registered SBCs that can be used on the contract. However, SBCs that are not DBEs will not be
counted toward the DBE contract goal.
SBCs can register online at the AZ UTRACS website.
The Department’s registration of SBCs is not a representation of qualifications and/or abilities nor
does it mean that an SBC firm is guaranteed or entitled to receive or be awarded a contract. Being
SBC registered simply means that a firm has met the criteria for SBC registration as outlined in 49
CFR Part 26. The consultant bears all risks of ensuring that SBC firms selected by the consultant
are able to perform the work.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 27

7.0 DBE Financial Institutions:
The Department thoroughly investigates the full extent of services offered by financial institutions
owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals in its service area
and makes reasonable efforts to use these institutions. The Department encourages prime
consultants to use such institutions on USDOT assisted contracts. However, use of DBE financial
institutions will not be counted toward the DBE contract goal.
The Department and the LPA/Subrecipient encourages prime consultants to research the Federal
Reserve Board website at www.federalreserve.gov to identify minority-owned banks in Arizona
derived from the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income filed quarterly by banks (FFIEC
031 and 041) and from other information on the Board’s National Information Center database.
8.0 Time is of the Essence:
TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE IN RESPECT TO THE DBE PROVISIONS
9.0 Computation of Time:
In computing any period of time described in this DBE special provision, such as calendar days,
the day from which the period begins to run is not counted, and when the last day of the period is a
Saturday, Sunday, Federal or State holiday, the period extends to the next day that is not a
Saturday, Sunday, Federal or State holiday. In circumstances where the LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office is closed for all or part of the last day, the period extends to the next day on
which the LPA / Subrecipient Procurement Office is open.
10.0 Consultant and Subconsultant Requirements:
10.01 General:
The consultant shall establish a DBE program that will ensure nondiscrimination in the award and
administration of contracts and subcontracts.
Agreements between the proposer and a DBE in which the DBE promises not to provide
subcontracting quotations to other proposers are prohibited.
10.02 DBE Liaison:
The consultant shall designate a DBE Liaison responsible for the administration of the consultant’s
DBE program. The name of the designated DBE Liaison shall be included on the DBE Intended
Participation Affidavit Summary.
11.0 DBE Goal:
The minimum goal for participation by DBEs on this project is as follows:
3.75 Percent
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 28

The percentage of DBE participation shall be based on the total dollar value of the contract.
Proposers are strongly encouraged to secure and include sufficient DBE firms on their team for
multiple disciplines and work categories to ensure they can meet the DBE goal on the contract and
for any Contract Modifications that are executed post-award. The DBE goal requirements extend to
additional dollars added by Contract Modification to help ensure that the overall DBE goal is met on
the contract. Indicating there is no DBE firm on a prime proposer’s team to meet the DBE goal on
Contract Modifications does not meet the criteria for Good Faith Efforts in 49 CFR 26.53, and will
not be accepted by the Department as Good Faith Efforts when Contract Modifications are issued.
Since proposers have been notified of the DBE goal prior to the submittal of their Statement of
Qualifications (SOQ) they are required to do their due diligence to secure enough DBE
participation to meet the goal or make good faith efforts on the contract and each subsequent
Contract Modification. Firms will be required to locate DBEs to meet the goal on each Contract
Modification even if these DBEs were not originally included as part of their team, if the
LPA/Subrecipient , with BECO concurrence, determines there are qualified DBEs available to
complete portions of the work of the Contract Modification.
12.0 Submission with SOQ Proposals:
12.01 DBE Assurance/Goal Declaration
In order to be awarded this contract, in addition to all other pre-award requirements, all proposers
are required to certify on the DBE Assurance Project Specific form provided by the
LPA/Subrecipient that:
The proposer will meet the established DBE goal or will make good faith efforts to meet the goal
and that arrangements with certified DBEs have been made prior to the SOQ and/or cost proposal
submission.
Failure to affirmatively make this declaration/certification in the manner outlined in the Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) furnished by the LPA/Subrecipient will cause a Proposer’s SOQ to be
considered non-responsive.
12.02 Bidders/Proposers List and AZ UTRACS Registration Requirement:
Under Title 49 CFR of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 26.11, DOTs are required to collect
certain information from all consultants and subconsultants who seek to work on federally-assisted
contracts in order to set overall and contract DBE goals. ADOT collects this information when firms
register their companies on the Arizona Unified Transportation Registration and Certification
System (AZ UTRACS) web portal at http://www.azutracs.com/ a centralized database for
companies that seek to do business with ADOT. This information will be maintained as confidential
to the extent allowed by federal and state law.
Prime consultants and all subconsultants, including DBEs listed in the SOQ must be registered in
AZ UTRACS. Proposers may verify that their firm and each subconsultant is registered using the
AZ UTRACS website.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 29

Proposers may obtain additional information at the AZ UTRACS website or by contacting the
LPA/Subrecipient.
All proposers shall create a Bidders/Proposers list in the AZ UTRACS by selecting all firms, service
providers, and vendors that expressed interest or submitted proposals or quotes for this contract.
The Bidders/Proposers List form must be complete and must include the names for all
subconsultants, service providers, and vendors that submitted proposals or quotes on this project
regardless of the proposer’s intentions to use the those firms on the project.
All proposers must complete and submit the Bidders/Proposers List online at AZ UTRACS prior to
Cost Proposal submittal. A confirmation email will be generated by the system. This email
confirmation shall be submitted with the Cost Proposal.
FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE REQUIRED BIDDERS/PROPOSERS LIST CONFIRMATION EMAIL
WITH THE COST PROPOSAL BY THE STATED TIME AND IN THE MANNER HEREIN
SPECIFIED AND AS OUTLINED IN THE RFQ SHALL BE CAUSE FOR THE PROPOSER’S COST
PROPOSAL TO BE REJECTED.
13. 0 DBE Cost Proposal Submissions:
13.01 DBE Intended Participation Affidavits:
If the proposer indicates in the Cost Proposal submittal that it has met or exceeded the DBE goal, a
DBE Intended Participation Affidavit form for each DBE firm, and the DBE Intended Participation
Affidavit Summary form shall be submitted to the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office with each
Cost Proposal as follows:
(1) The DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Form must be submitted for each individual DBE firm
at all tiers, including direct expense vendors, that is being proposed to be used to meet the DBE
goal on the project. A copy of this form is available from the LPA/Subrecipient.
(2) The DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary Form must be completed by the consultant
summarizing information about all DBEs being proposed to meet the DBE goal that are listed on
each DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Form. The DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary
Form, along with the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit form for each individual DBE firm, must
be submitted together with the Cost Proposal to the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office All forms
must be accurate and complete in every detail and must be signed by an officer of the
consultant(s). Percentages and dollar amounts must be accurate. Percentages shall be listed to
two decimal places. The DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary must be submitted listing
all the DBEs intended to be used and the creditable amounts. Copies of these forms are available
from the LPA/Subrecipient.
(3) The DBE Intended Participation Affidavits Forms and the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit
Summary Form must be submitted with the original cost proposal documents. The same
documents must be submitted as part of the contract modification documentation submittals
reflecting any change in the contract amount associated with the contract modification.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 30

(4) A proposer must determine DBE credit for the contract in accordance with DBE Special
Provision Subsection 17.0 Crediting DBE Participation Toward Meeting Goals. The affidavits will
be reviewed by the LPA/Subrecipient.
(5) Only those DBE firms certified by the Arizona Unified Certification Program (AZUCP) at the time
of the Cost Proposal submittal will be considered for DBE credit. It shall be the proposer’s
responsibility to ascertain the certification status of designated DBEs.
(6) All DBE commitment amounts must be finalized between the DBE subconsultant and the
proposer prior to affidavit submittal. Proposers shall not inflate DBE awards in order to meet
contract goals. Reduction of DBE commitments after affidavit submittal and prior to execution of
the contract without good cause may be grounds for the proposer to be considered nonresponsive.
Scheduling conflicts are not necessarily evidence of good cause as this should have been
considered prior to affidavit submittal. Proposers are required to use DBEs identified in both the
SOQ and Cost Proposal to meet the contract goal, so the consultant is responsible for ensuring the
DBEs listed in the SOQ and submitted with the Cost Proposal are available to meet those
requirements at the time of contract execution.
(7) Cost proposals without affidavits shall be considered incomplete and contract negotiations
shall not be finalized nor will the contract be executed until affidavits are submitted and approved.
14.0 Documented Good Faith Effort:
14.01 General:
If the selected proposer has indicated in its cost proposal submittal that it will be unable to meet the
DBE goal, that proposer must demonstrate, through detailed and comprehensive documentation,
that good faith efforts have been made to solicit, assist, and use DBE firms to meet the DBE goal
prior to submission of the SOQ and cost proposal.
Failure to demonstrate good faith efforts to the satisfaction of LPA/Subrecipient with concurrence of
BECO will result in denying the award and moving to the next second highest ranked proposer.
The selected proposer who cannot meet the DBE goal at the time the cost proposal is due must
submit its documentation of good faith efforts to the LPA/Subrecipient with the cost proposal.
Contract negotiations will not be finalized nor will the contract be executed until the required Good
Faith Effort forms and required documentation are received and approved.
The documentation of good faith efforts must include copies of each DBE and non-DBE
subconsultant quotes submitted to the proposer when a non-DBE subconsultant was selected over
a DBE for work on the contract. A generalized assertion that the consultant received multiple
quotes is not sufficient unless copies of those quotes are provided.
Proposers are encouraged to review Appendix A of 49 CFR Part 26.
Useful information related to encouraging DBE participation and documented good faith efforts can
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 31

be found in the “Good Faith Effort Guide” and other documents made available on the BECO
website. The information provided in the “Good Faith Effort Guide” does not replace this
specification; proposers must comply with the requirements of this specification.
In order to be awarded a contract on the basis of good faith efforts, a proposer must show that it
took all necessary and reasonable steps to achieve the DBE goal, which, by their scope, intensity,
and appropriateness to the objective, could reasonably be expected to obtain sufficient DBE
participation, even if they were not fully successful. The quality, quantity, and intensity of the
different kinds of efforts the proposer has made will be evaluated. The efforts employed by the
proposer should be those that one could reasonably expect a proposer to make if the proposer
were actively and aggressively trying to obtain DBE participation sufficient to meet the DBE goal.
Mere pro forma efforts are not sufficient good faith efforts to meet the DBE contract requirements.
The proposer shall, as a minimum, seek DBEs in the same geographic area in which it generally
seeks subconsultants for a given project. If the proposer cannot meet the goals using DBEs from
this geographic area, the proposer, as part of its effort to meet the goals, shall expand its search to
a reasonably wider geographic area.
The following is a list of types of efforts a proposer must address when submitting good faith effort
documentation.
(1) Contacting the LPA/Subrecipient and BECO prior to the submission of proposals, either by e-
mail, or by telephone, to inform of the firm’s difficulty in meeting the DBE goals on a given project,
and requesting assistance. The proposer must document its contact with the LPA/Subrecipient
and BECO, and indicate the type of contact, the date and time of the contact, the name of the
person(s) contacted, and any details related to the communication. The contact must be made in
sufficient time before proposal submission to allow the LPA/Subrecipient and BECO to provide
effective assistance. The proposer will not be considered to have made good faith efforts if the
proposer failed to contact the LPA/Subrecipient and BECO.
(2) Conducting market research to identify small business consultants and suppliers, and
soliciting, through all reasonable and available means, the interest of all certified DBEs who have
the capability to perform the work of the contract. This may include attendance at pre-proposal
meetings and business matchmaking meetings and events, advertising and/or providing written
notices, posting of “Notices of Sources Sought” and/or “Requests for Proposals” at reasonable
locations, including the consultant’s website, written notices or emails to all DBEs listed in the
Department’s directory of transportation firms that specialize in areas of work desired (as noted in
the DBE directory) and which are located in the area or surrounding areas of the project. The
proposer should solicit this interest as early in the acquisition process as practicable to allow DBEs
to respond to the solicitation and submit a timely offer for the subcontract. The proposer should
determine with certainty if DBEs are interested by taking appropriate steps to follow-up initial
solicitations.
(3) Selecting portions of the work to be performed by DBEs in order to increase the likelihood that
the DBE goal will be achieved. This includes, where appropriate, breaking out contract work items
into economically feasible units (for example smaller tasks or quantities) to facilitate DBE
participation, even when the prime consultant might otherwise prefer to perform these work items
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 32

with its own forces. This may include, where possible, establishing flexible time frames for
performance and delivery schedules in a manner that encourages and facilitates DBE participation.
(4) Providing interested DBEs with adequate information about the plans, specifications, and
requirements of the contract in a timely manner to assist them in responding to a solicitation with
their offer for a subcontract.
(5) Negotiating in good faith with interested DBEs. It is the proposer’s responsibility to make a
portion of the work available to the DBE subconsultants and suppliers, and to select those portions
of work or material needs consistent with the available DBE subconsultants and suppliers, so as to
facilitate DBE participation. Evidence of such negotiation includes the names, addresses, and
telephone numbers of DBEs that were considered; a description of the information provided from
the plans and specifications for the work selected for subcontracting; and evidence as to why
additional agreements could not be reached for DBEs to perform work.
Pro forma mailings to DBEs requesting proposals are not alone sufficient to constitute good faith
negotiation.
A proposer using good business judgment would consider a number of factors in negotiating with
subconsultants, including DBE subconsultants, and would take a firm’s price and capabilities as
well as contract goals into consideration. However, the fact that there may be some additional
costs involved in finding and using DBEs is not in itself sufficient reason for a proposer’s failure to
meet the DBE goal, as long as such costs are reasonable. Also, the ability or desire of a prime
consultant to perform the work of a contract with its own organization does not relieve the proposer
of the responsibility to make good faith efforts. However, prime consultants are not required to
accept higher quotes from DBEs if the price difference is excessive or unreasonable.
Documentation, such as copies of all other proposals or quotes, must be submitted.
Another practice considered an insufficient good faith effort is the rejection of the DBE because its
quotation for the work was not the lowest received. The consultant must submit copies of each
DBE and non-DBE subconsultant quote submitted to the proposer when a non-DBE subconsultant
was selected over a DBE for work on the contract. The Department may contact rejected DBEs as
part of its investigation. However, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to require the
proposer or prime consultant to accept unreasonable quotes in order to satisfy contract goals.
(6) Not rejecting DBEs as being unqualified without sound reasons based on a thorough
investigation of their capabilities. The consultant’s standing within its industry, membership in
specific groups, organizations or associations and political or social affiliations (for example, union
vs. non-union employee status) are not legitimate causes for the rejection or non-solicitation of
proposals in the consultant’s efforts to meet the project goal. Consultant must submit
documentation of past performance and with input from the PM, consultant’s qualifications are then
reviewed for acceptance and approval.
(7) Making efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining bonding, lines of credit, or insurance as
required by the recipient or consultant.
(8) Making efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining necessary equipment, supplies, materials,
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 33

or related assistance or services.
(9) Effectively using the services of available minority/women community organizations;
minority/women consultants’ groups; local, state, and Federal minority/women business assistance
offices; and other organizations as allowed on a case-by-case basis to provide assistance in the
recruitment and placement of DBEs.
In determining whether a proposer has made good faith efforts, the LPA/Subrecipient will review
the documented efforts of the consultant and will review the performance of other proposers in
meeting the contract goal.
A promise to use DBEs after contract award is not considered to be responsive to the contract
solicitation or to constitute good faith efforts.
The LPA/Subrecipient will evaluate the submittal and make a determination, with BECO
concurrence, whether in fact good faith efforts have been demonstrated consistent with the
specifications and the Federal regulations, 49 CFR 26, Appendix A.
14.02 Protest for Denied Good Faith Efforts:
If the LPA/Subrecipient, with BECO concurrence, determines that the proposer failed to make
adequate good faith efforts, the proposer may protest the determination by submitting an appeal in
writing to the ADOT State Engineer. The decision of the ADOT State Engineer is administratively
final.
The proposer whose proposal was rejected for failure to meet the goal or make GFE will be given
the opportunity to meet in person with the State Engineer, at the proposer’s written request
included in the protest, to discuss the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate good faith
efforts to do so. The State Engineer shall promptly consider any appeals and notify the
LPA/Subrecipient and all proposers in writing on its findings and decision.
In accordance with 49 CFR 26.53(d)(5), the result of the protest decision is not subject to
administrative appeal to the USDOT.
15.0 Rejection of Proposal:
If, for any reason, the proposer’s GFE is rejected or contract negotiations fail, the LPA/Subrecipient
will proceed with negotiating with the second highest ranked firm. The LPA/Subrecipient, will notify
the second highest ranked firm, and this firm shall submit its subsequent detailed submission as
set forth in the DBE Subsections 13 or 14.
16.0 Payment Reporting:
The consultant shall report on a monthly basis indicating the amounts paid to all subconsultants, of
all tiers, working on the project. Reporting shall be in accordance with Prompt Pay and Payment
Reporting requirements Attachment 1 of the contract specifications.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 34

17.0 Crediting DBE Participation Toward Meeting Goals:
17.01 General Requirements:
To count toward meeting the goal, the DBE firms must be certified at the time of Cost Proposal
submission in each NAICS code applicable to the kind of work the firm will perform on the contract.
NAICS for each DBE can be found on the AZ UTRACS website. General descriptions of all NAICS
codes can be found at http://www.naics.com/search/.
Credit towards the consultant’s DBE goal is given only after the DBE has been paid for the work
performed.
The entire amount of a contract that is performed by the DBE’s own forces, including the cost of
supplies and materials purchased by the DBE for the work on the contract and equipment leased
by the DBE will be credited toward DBE participation. Supplies and equipment the DBE
subconsultant purchases or leases from the prime consultant or its affiliate will not be credited
toward DBE participation.
The consultant bears the responsibility to determine whether the DBE possesses the proper
consultant’s license(s) to perform the work and, if DBE credit is requested, that the DBE
subconsultant is certified for the requested type of work.
If a DBE cannot complete its work due to failure to obtain or maintain its licensing, the consultant
bears the responsibility to notify the LPA/Subrecipient, immediately after the consultant becomes
aware of the situation, and request approval to replace the DBE with another DBE. The consultant
shall follow the DBE termination/substitution requirements described in Subsection 22.0 of these
DBE provisions.
The Department’s certification is not a representation of a DBE’s qualifications and/or abilities. The
consultant bears all risks that the DBE may not be able to perform its work for any reason.
A DBE may participate as a prime consultant, subconsultant, or as a vendor of materials or
supplies. The dollar amount of work to be accomplished by DBEs, including partial amount of a
lump sum or other similar item, shall be on the basis of subcontract, purchase order, hourly rate,
rate per ton, etc., as agreed to between parties.
DBE credit may be obtained only for specific work done for the project, supply of equipment
specifically for physical work on the project, or supply of materials to be incorporated in the work.
DBE credit will not be allowed for costs such as overhead items, capital expenditures (for example,
purchase of equipment), and office items.
The consultant may credit second-tier subcontracts issued to DBEs by non-DBE subconsultants.
Any second-tier subcontract to a DBE used to meet the goal must meet the requirements of a first-
tier DBE subcontract.
A prime consultant may credit the entire amount of that portion of a contract that is performed by
the DBE’s own forces. The cost of supplies and materials obtained by the DBE for the work of the
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 35

contract can be included so long as that cost is reasonable. Leased equipment may also be
included. No credit is permitted for supplies purchased or equipment leased from the prime
consultant or its affiliate(s).
When a DBE subcontracts a part of the work of its contract to another firm, the value of the
subcontract may be credited towards the DBE goal only if the DBE’s subconsultant is itself a DBE
and performs the work with its own forces. Work that a DBE subcontracts to a non-DBE firm does
not count toward a DBE goal.
A prime consultant may credit the entire amount of fees or commissions charged by a DBE firm for
providing a bona fide service, such as professional, technical, consulting, or managerial services,
or for providing bonds or insurance specifically required for the performance of a USDOT-assisted
contract, provided the fees are reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees customarily
allowed for similar services.
17.02 DBE Prime Consultant:
When a certified DBE firm proposes on a contract that contains a DBE goal, the DBE firm is
responsible for meeting the DBE goal on the contract or making good faith efforts to meet the goal,
just like any other proposer. In most cases, a DBE proposer on a contract will meet the DBE goal
by virtue of the work it performs on the contract with its own forces. However, all the work that is
performed by the DBE proposer or any other DBE subconsultants and DBE suppliers will count
toward the DBE goal. The DBE proposer shall list itself along with any DBE subconsultants and
suppliers, on the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Individual and Summary in order to receive
credit toward the DBE goal.
17.03 Effect of Loss of DBE Eligibility:
If a DBE is deemed ineligible (decertified) or suspended in accordance with 49 CFR 26.87 and
26.88, the DBE may not be considered to meet a contract goal on a new contract, but may be
considered to meet the contract goal under a subcontract that was executed before the DBE
suspension or decertification is effective.
When the consultant makes a commitment to use an ineligible DBE firm or the LPA/Subrecipient,
made a commitment to use an ineligible DBE prime consultant, but a subcontract or contract has
not been executed before a decertification notice is issued to the DBE firm by its certifying agency,
the ineligible firm does not count toward the contract goal. The consultant must meet the contract
goal with an eligible DBE firm or demonstrate good faith effort. When a subcontract is executed
with the DBE firm before the Department notified the firm of its ineligibility, the consultant may
continue to use the firm on the contract and may continue to receive credit toward the DBE goal for
the firm’s work.
17.04 Notifying the Consultant of DBE Certification Status:
Each DBE contract at any tier shall require any DBE subconsultant or supplier that is either
decertified or certified during the term of the contract to immediately notify the consultant and all
parties to the DBE contract in writing, with the date of decertification or certification. The consultant
shall require that this provision be incorporated in any contract of any tier in which a DBE is a
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 36

participant.
17.05 Police Officers:
DBE credit will not be permitted for procuring DPS officers. For projects on which officers from
other agencies are supplied, DBE credit will be given only for the broker fees charged, and will not
include amounts paid to the officers. The broker fees must be reasonable.
17.06 Commercially Useful Function:
A prime consultant can credit expenditures to a DBE subconsultant toward DBE goals only if the
DBE performs a Commercially Useful Function (CUF).
A DBE performs a CUF when it is responsible for execution of the work of a contract and carries
out its responsibilities by actually performing, managing, and supervising the work involved. To
perform a commercially useful function, the DBE must also be responsible, with respect to
materials and supplies on the contract, for negotiating price, determining quality and quantity,
ordering the material, and installing (where applicable) and paying for the material itself that it uses
on the project. To determine whether a DBE is performing a commercially useful function, the
LPA/Subrecipient will evaluate the amount of work subcontracted, industry practices, whether the
amount the firm is to be paid under the contract is commensurate with the work it is actually
performing and the DBE credit claimed for its performance of the work, and other relevant factors.
A DBE will not be considered to perform a commercially useful function if its role is limited to that of
an extra participant in a transaction, contract, or project through which funds are passed in order to
obtain the appearance of DBE participation. In determining whether a DBE is such an extra
participant, the LPA/Subrecipient will examine similar transactions, particularly those in which
DBEs do not participate.
If a DBE does not perform or exercise responsibility for at least 30 percent of the total cost of its
contract with its own work force, or if the DBE subcontracts a greater portion of the work of a
contract than would be expected on the basis of normal industry practice for the type of work
involved, LPA/Subrecipient will presume that the DBE is not performing a commercially useful
function.
When a DBE is presumed not to be performing a commercially useful function as provided above,
the DBE may present evidence to rebut this presumption. The Department will determine if the
firm is performing a CUF given the type of work involved and normal industry practices.
The LPA/Subrecipient will notify the consultant, in writing, if it determines that the consultant’s DBE
subconsultant is not performing a CUF. The consultant will be notified within seven calendar days
of the LPA/Subrecipient’s decision.
Decisions on CUF may be appealed to the ADOT BECO. The appeal must be in writing and
personally delivered or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the ADOT BECO. The
appeal must be received by ADOT BECO no later than seven calendar days after the
LPA/Subrecipient’s decision. LPA/Subrecipient’s decision remains in place unless and until the
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 37

ADOT BECO reverses or modifies LPA/Subrecipient’s decision. ADOT BECO will promptly
consider any appeals under this subsection and notify the consultant of the ADOT BECO findings
and decisions. Decisions on CUF matters are not administratively appealable to USDOT.
The LPA/Subrecipient may conduct project site visits on the contract to confirm that DBEs are
performing a CUF. The consultant shall cooperate during the site visits and the LPA/Subrecipient
staff will make every effort not to disrupt work on the project.
18.0 Effect of Contract Changes:
The consultant acknowledges that uncertainties can occur during the performance of the work and
if for any reason it becomes apparent that the DBE goal will not be met then the consultant shall:
(1) immediately notify the LPA/Subrecipient of the potential or actual decrease in DBE
compensation, and (2) make good faith efforts to obtain DBE participation to meet or exceed the
project DBE goal. Good faith efforts required under the provisions of this section may vary,
depending on the time available, the nature of the change, and other factors as determined by
LPA/Subrecipient.
LPA/Subrecipient will approve or deny the consultant’s good faith efforts with BECO concurrence.
The consultant is not required to take work committed to another subconsultant and assign it to a
DBE subconsultant in order to meet the committed DBE percentage.
If the resulting change increases the scope or quantity of work being done by a DBE
subconsultant, the DBE shall be given the opportunity to complete the additional work and receive
additional compensation beyond their original subcontract amount.
19.0 DBE Participation Above the Goal (Race-Neutral Participation):
Additional DBE participation above the DBE participation required to meet the contract DBE goal is
an important aspect of the Department’s DBE program. The consultant is strongly encouraged to
use additional DBEs above the DBE goal requirement in the contract to assist the Department in
meeting its overall DBE goal and help the Department to meet the maximum feasible portion of its
DBE goals through race neutral participation as outlined in 49 CFR Part 26.
There are fewer administrative requirements on the part of the consultant when using race neutral
DBEs (DBEs not listed on the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary). For example, if a
DBE is not listed on the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary, the DBE does not have to
submit an Affidavit, and the subcontract approval process follows the same process of any other
subcontract. The consultant does not have to replace the DBE with another DBE subconsultant if
the DBE fails to perform. Therefore these DBEs are treated as any other subconsultant on the
project.
20.0 Required Provisions for DBE Subcontracts:
All subcontracts of any tier, all supply contracts, and any other contracts in which a DBE is a
participant shall include as a physical attachment, DBE Subconsultant Compliance Assurances
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 38

available from the LPA/Subrecipient and all of the Uniform Terms and Conditions set forth in other
sections of this contract.
Consultants executing agreements with subconsultants, DBE or non-DBE, that materially modify
federal regulation and state statutes such as, prompt payment and retention requirements, through
subcontract terms and conditions will be found in breach of contract which may result in termination
of the contract, or any other such remedy as the LPA/Subrecipient and ADOT deem appropriate as
outlined in DBE Subsection 2.0.
The LPA/Subrecipient reserves the right to conduct random reviews of DBE and non-DBE
subcontract documentation to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
The consultant shall ensure that all subcontracts or agreements with DBEs to supply labor or
materials require that the subcontract and all lower tier subcontracts be performed in accordance
with 49 CFR Part 26 provisions.
The Consultant shall provide electronic copies of signed subcontract agreements for all DBE
Subconsultants listed on the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary by uploading them
within 15 calendar days of an approved contract to the LPA DBE System.
21.0 Contract Performance:
Contract items of work designated by the consultant to be awarded to DBEs shall be performed by
the designated DBE or a LPA/Subrecipient, with BECO concurrence, approved DBE substitute.
The Consultant or a non-DBE Subconsultant shall not perform DBE contract work items without
prior approval by LPA/Subrecipient, with BECO concurrence. The DBE must perform a
commercially useful function; that is, the DBE must manage, perform, and supervise a distinct
element of work.
The consultant is required to use DBEs identified in the SOQ to meet the contract goal, so the
prime consultant is responsible for ensuring that the DBEs are available to meet scheduling, work
and other requirements on the contract.
The LPA/Subrecipient will visit the consultant’s office to conduct reviews to ensure compliance with
CUF and other DBE requirements. The reviews may include, among other activities, interview of
DBEs and their employees and the consultant and its employees. The consultant shall cooperate
in the review and make its employees available. The consultant shall inform the LPA/Subrecipient
in advance when each DBE will be working on the project to help facilitate reviews.
The LPA/Subrecipient reserves the right to request and inspect all records of the consultant and all
records of the DBEs and non-DBE subconsultants concerning this contract. The consultant must
make available a copy of all documents related to all contracts the LPA/Subrecipient upon request.
Use of every DBE listed on the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary is a condition of this
contract. The consultant shall utilize the specific DBEs listed to perform the work and supply the
materials for which each is listed on the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary unless the
consultant obtains written consent from the LPA/Subrecipient with BECO concurrence. The
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 39

consultant shall not be entitled to any payment for work or material that is not performed or
supplied by the listed DBE unless the consultant obtains written consent from the LPA/Subrecipient
with BECO concurrence.
22.0 DBE Termination/Substitution:
22.01 General Requirements:
The consultant shall make all reasonable efforts to avoid terminating or substituting a DBE listed on
the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary. At a minimum, the consultant shall negotiate in
good faith, give timely notices and/or extend deadlines to the extent that it will not jeopardize the
contract with the LPA/Subrecipient. Reasonable methods to resolve performance disputes must be
applied and documentation provided to the LPA/Subrecipient before attempting to substitute or
terminate a DBE.
22.02 Consultant Notice of Termination/Substitution:
All terminations, substitutions, and reductions in scope of work to be performed by DBEs listed on
the DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Summary must be approved in writing by the
LPA/Subrecipient, with BECO concurrence and by means of the executed contract modification.
The consultant shall contact the LPA/Subrecipient within 24 hours from the first sign of any reason
for potential DBE termination/substitution.
The consultant shall not terminate a DBE subconsultant listed on the DBE Intended Participation
Affidavit Summary or complete the work contracted to the DBE with its own forces or with a non-
DBE firm without the LPA/Subrecipient written consent and BECO concurrence. Before submitting
a formal request to the LPA/Subrecipient for DBE termination/substitution, the consultant shall give
written notice to the DBE subconsultant with a copy to the LPA/Subrecipient of its intent to
terminate or substitute the DBE identifying the reason for the action. The DBE shall be allowed a
minimum of five calendar days to respond to the consultant’s notice advising the consultant, the
LPA/Subrecipient of its position. Before making a determination for approval regarding the
consultant’s termination and substitution request, the LPA/Subrecipient, with BECO concurrence,
will consider both the consultant’s request and the DBE firm’s response.
22.03 Consultant Request of Termination/Substitution:
The consultant shall formally request the termination or substitution of a DBE listed on the DBE
Intended Participation Affidavit Summary by submitting the DBE Termination/Substitution Request
Form and supporting documentation to the LPA/Subrecipient; form is available from the
LPA/Subrecipient. The submission shall include the following information:
1) The date the consultant determined the DBE to be unwilling, unable or ineligible to perform.
2) A brief statement of facts describing the situation and citing specific actions or inaction by the
DBE firm giving rise to consultant’s assertion that the DBE firm is unwilling, unable, or ineligible to
perform.
3) A brief statement of the good faith efforts undertaken by the consultant to enable the DBE firm to
perform.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 40

4) The total dollar amount currently paid for work performed by the DBE firm.
5) The total dollar amount remaining to be paid to the DBE firm for work completed, but for which
the DBE firm has not received payment, and over which the consultant and the DBE firm have no
dispute.
6) The remaining work that has not been completed by the DBE and the corresponding dollar
amount
7) The projected date that the consultant requires a substitution or replacement DBE to commence
work, if consent is granted to the request.
Written consent for terminating the performance of any DBE listed on the DBE Intended
Participation Affidavit Summary will be granted only where the consultant can demonstrate good
cause showing that the DBE is unable, unwilling, or ineligible to perform. Such written consent to
terminate any DBE shall concurrently constitute written consent to substitute or replace the
terminated DBE. Termination or substitution of a DBE listed on the DBE Intended Participation
Summary will not be allowed based solely on a consultant's ability to negotiate a more
advantageous contract with another subconsultant. Prior to making a determination for approval
regarding the consultant’s termination and substitution request, the LPA/Subrecipient, with BECO
concurrence, will consider both the consultant’s request and the DBE firm’s response.
Any requests for substitutions or terminations of DBEs shall be made on the forms provided by
LPA/Subrecipient.
22.04 Good Cause:
The LPA/Subrecipient, with BECO concurrence, will make the determination of good cause by
providing written consent to the consultant after evaluating the consultant’s good cause to
terminate or substitute a DBE firm. Good cause for this purpose includes the following in relation to
the listed DBE subconsultant:
1. Fails or refuses to execute a written contract.
2. Fails or refuses to perform the work of its subcontract in a way consistent with normal industry
practice standards. However, good cause does not exist if the failure or refusal of the DBE
subconsultant to perform its work on the subcontract results from the bad faith or discriminatory
action of the prime consultant.
3. Fails or refuses to meet the prime consultant’s reasonable, nondiscriminatory insurance/bond
requirements.
4. Becomes bankrupt, insolvent, or exhibits credit unworthiness.
5. Is ineligible to work on public works projects because of suspension and debarment proceedings
pursuant to federal or state law.
6. Is not a responsible consultant.
7. Voluntarily withdraws from the project and provides written notice of its withdrawal to the
LPA/Subrecipient.
8. Is ineligible to receive DBE credit for the type of work required
9. A DBE owner dies or becomes disabled with the result that the firm is unable to complete its
work on the contract.
10. Other documented good cause that the LPA/Subrecipient determines compels the termination
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 41

or substitution of the DBE subconsultant.
If good cause is determined, the LPA/Subrecipient and will notify the Consultant of the decision
and necessary modifications to the contract can be made.
22.05 DBE Replacement Good Faith Effort:
If the LPA/Subrecipient, with BECO concurrence, approves the termination of a DBE, the
consultant shall make good faith efforts to find another DBE subconsultant to substitute for the
original DBE. The good faith efforts as identified in DBE Subsection 17.0 shall be directed at
finding another DBE to perform at least the same amount of work under the contract as the DBE
that was terminated, to the extent needed to meet the contract goal. The good faith efforts shall be
documented and provided, upon request, to the LPA/Subrecipient within seven calendar days from
the date of the request.
A prime consultant’s inability to find a replacement DBE at the original price is not alone sufficient
to support a finding that good faith efforts have been made to replace the original DBE. The fact
that the consultant has the ability and/or desire to perform the contract work with its own forces
does not relieve the consultant of the obligation to make good faith efforts to find the replacement
DBE, and it is not a sound basis for rejecting a perspective replacement DBE’s reasonable quote.
The termination of a DBE firm shall not relieve the consultant of its obligations under this Special
Provision, and the unpaid portion of the terminated DBE firm’s subcontract will not be counted
toward the DBE goal. If the LPA/Subrecipient has eliminated items of work subcontracted to a
committed DBE, the prime consultant shall still make good faith efforts to replace the DBE with
another DBE to the extent necessary to meet the goal. The LPA/Subrecipient will review the
quality, thoroughness, and intensity of those efforts.
When a DBE substitution has been approved by the LPA/Subrecipient and concurred by BECO,
the consultant shall submit an amended DBE Intended Participation Affidavit Individual and
Intended Participation Affidavit Summary to the LPA/Subrecipient for approval with the substitute
DBE's name, description of work, NAICS code, AZ UTRACS registration number, and dollar value
of work. Approval from LPA/Subrecipient with BECO concurrence must be obtained prior to the
execution of a contract modification and before substituted DBE can begin work.
22.06 Sanctions:
Failure by the consultant to carry out the requirements of these DBE Termination/Substitution
specifications is a material breach of contract and will result in such remedies as LPA/Subrecipient
deems appropriate, with ADOT concurrence, which will include, but are not limited to the
assessment of liquidated damages. The LPA/Subrecipient will deduct from monies due or
becoming due the consultant, the dollar amount of the wrongfully substituted/replaced DBE
subcontract plus 25% of the amount remaining to be paid to the DBE as liquidated damages.
These liquidated damages shall be in addition to all other retention or liquidated damages provided
for elsewhere in the contract.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 42

23.0 Certification of Final DBE Payments:
The consultant’s achievement of the goal is measured by actual payments made to the DBEs. The
consultant shall submit the “Certification of Final DBE Payments” form for each DBE firm working
on the contract. This form shall be signed by the consultant and the relevant DBE, and submitted to
the LPA/Subrecipient no later than 30 days after the DBE completes its work.
The LPA/Subrecipient and ADOT will use this certification and other information available to
determine applicable DBE credit allowed to date by the Prime Consultant and the extent to which
the DBE firms were fully paid for that work. By the act of filing the forms, the consultant
acknowledges that the information is supplied in order to justify the payment of state and federal
funds to the consultant.
The consultant will not be released from the obligations of the contract until the “Certification of
Final DBE Payments” forms are received and deemed acceptable by the LPA/Subrecipient.
24.0 Sanctions for Not Meeting Contract DBE Goal:
If the LPA/Subrecipient determines, with BECO concurrence, that the consultant has not met the
DBE goal at the end of the contract, the LPA/Subrecipient will, at its discretion, may assess
liquidated damages up to two times the amount of the unattained portion of the original DBE goal,
based on the circumstances of the noncompliance. Not meeting the DBE goal will also be reflected
in the consultant evaluation.
The LPA/Subrecipient, with BECO concurrence, will determine whether liquidated damages will be
assessed and the amount of the liquidate damages, the LPA/Subrecipient will consider whether
there have been other violations on this or other contracts, whether the failure was due to
circumstances beyond the control of the consultant, whether the consultant has made good faith
efforts to meet the goal, and other appropriate circumstances.
In addition to any other sanctions, willful failure of the consultant, DBE or other subconsultant to
comply with this contract or with the Federal DBE regulations may result in disqualification from
further contracting, subcontracting, or other participation in the Department’s and LPA/Subrecipient
projects.
25.0 False, Fraudulent, or Dishonest Conduct:
In addition to any other remedies or actions, the Department will bring to the attention of the US
Department of Transportation any appearance of false, fraudulent, or dishonest conduct in
connection with the DBE program, so that USDOT can take steps such as referral to the
Department of Justice for criminal prosecution, referral to the USDOT Inspector General for
possible initiation of suspension and debarment proceedings against the offending parties or
application of “Program Fraud and Civil Penalties” rules provided in 49 CFR Part 31.
SECTION XXXVI—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 43

CONSULTANT is required to comply with all applicable standards, orders or requirements issued
under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR Part
15) which prohibit the use under non-exempt Federal contracts, grants or loans of facilities included on
the EPA list of Violating Facilities. Violations shall be reported to the Federal Highway Administration
and to the U.S.E.P.A. Assistant Administrator for Enforcement (EN-329).
SECTION XXXVII—ENERGY CONSERVATION
CONSULTANT is required to comply with mandatory standards and policies, as applicable, relating to
energy efficiency which are contained in the State Energy Conservation Plan issued by the State of
Arizona in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (P.L. 94-163).
SECTION XXXVIII - PATENTS AND COPYRIGHTS
All services, information, computer program elements, reports and other deliverables which
might be patented or copyrighted and created under this Contract are the property of the
COUNTY and shall not be used or released by the CONSULTANT or any other person except
with the prior written approval by the COUNTY.
SECTION XXXIX - FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS
The CONSULTANT understands that, if the project which is the subject of this Contract is
financed in whole or in part by federal funds, that if the undersigned, the company that the
CONSULTANT represents, or any employee or agent thereof, knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, report or claim as to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of
material used or to be used, or quantity or quality work performed or to be performed, or makes
any false statement or representation of a material fact in any statement, certificate, or report,
the CONSULTANT and any company that the CONSULTANT represents may be subject to
prosecution under the provision of 18 USC §1001 and §1020.
SECTION XL - FEDERAL IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT
A. GENERAL
The CONSULTANT, including all Subconsultants, shall comply with all federal, state and
local immigration laws and regulations, as set forth in Arizona Executive Order 2005-30,
relating to the immigration status of their employees who perform services on the Contract
during the duration of the Contract. The COUNTY shall retain the right to perform random
audits of CONSULTANT and Subconsultants’ records or to inspect papers of any employee
thereof to ensure compliance.
The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of this Section in all its subcontracts. In
addition, the CONSULTANT shall require that all Subconsultants comply with the
provisions of this Section, monitor such Subconsultants’ compliance, and assist the
COUNTY in any compliance verification regarding its Subconsultant(s).
B. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 44

The COUNTY retains the legal right to inspect the papers or records of the CONSULTANT
and its Subconsultants who works on this Contract to ensure compliance with A.R.S.
§41-4401, Government Procurement, E-Verify Requirements; Sanctions.
By submission of an SOQ proposal, the CONSULTANT warrants that the
CONSULTANT and all proposed Subconsultant(s) are and shall remain in compliance
with:
1. All federal, state and local immigration laws and regulations relating to the immigration
status of their employees who perform services on the Contract; and
2. A.R.S. §23-214 (A) which states “After December 31, 2007, every employer, after
hiring an employee, shall verify the employment eligibility of the employee through
the e-verify program and shall keep a record of the verification for the duration of the
employee’s employment or at least three years, whichever is longer.”
A breach of a warranty regarding compliance with immigration laws and regulations shall be
deemed a material breach of the Contract, and the CONSULTANT and its Subconsultant(s)
are subject to sanctions specified in Section D below.
Failure to comply with a COUNTY audit process to randomly verify the employment records
of CONSULTANT and Subconsultants shall be deemed a material breach of the Contract,
and the CONSULTANT and Subconsultants are subject to sanctions specified in Section D
below.
C. COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION
The COUNTY may, at its sole discretion, require evidence of compliance from
the CONSULTANT and its Subconsultant(s).
Should the COUNTY request evidence of compliance, the CONSULTANT shall complete
and return the Consultant Employment Record Verification Form and Employee Verification
Worksheet provided by the COUNTY, no later than 21 days from receipt of the request for
such information.
Listing of the compliance verification procedure specified above does not preclude the
COUNTY from utilizing other means to determine compliance.
The COUNTY retains the legal right to inspect the papers of any employee who works on
the Contract to ensure that the CONSULTANT and its Subconsultant(s) is/are complying
with the warranty specified in this.
D. SANCTIONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE
For purposes of this paragraph, noncompliance refers to either the CONSULTANTs or its
Subconsultants’ failure to follow the immigration laws or to the CONSULTANT’s failure
to provide records when requested. Failure to comply with the immigration laws or to
submit proof of compliance constitutes a material breach of Contract. At a minimum, the
COUNTY shall reduce the CONSULTANT’s compensation by $10,000 for the initial
instance of noncompliance by the CONSULTANT or its Subconsultant(s). If the same
CONSULTANT or its Subconsultant(s) is in noncompliance within two (2) years from the
initial noncompliance, the CONSULTANT’s compensation shall be reduced by a minimum
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 45

of $10,000 for each instance of noncompliance. The third instance by the same
CONSULTANT or its Subconsultant(s) within a two (2) year period may result in addition to
the minimum $50,000 reduction in compensation, in removal of the offending
CONSULTANT or its Subconsultant(s), suspension of work in whole or in part or, in the
case of a third violation by the CONSULTANT, termination of the Contract for default.
Instances of noncompliance are counted on a firm-wide basis, not on a contract-by-contract
basis.
In addition, the COUNTY may declare the CONSULTANT or its Subconsultant(s) who is in
noncompliance three times within a two (2) year period ineligible to perform on any
COUNTY Contract for up to one (1) year. For purposes of considering a declaration of
ineligibility: (1) noncompliance by a Subconsultant does not count as a violation by the
CONSULTANT; and (2) the COUNTY shall count instances of noncompliance on other
COUNTY Contracts.
The sanctions described herein are the minimum sanctions. In case of major violations,
the COUNTY reserves the right to impose any sanctions including and up to termination
and debarment, regardless of the number of instances of non-compliance.
Any delay resulting from compliance verification or a sanction under this subsection is a
non-excusable delay. The CONSULTANT is not entitled to any compensation or
extension of time for any delays or additional costs resulting from compliance verification
or a sanction under this Section.
An example of the minimum sanctions under this subsection is presented
in the table below:
Offense by:
Minimum
Reduction in
Consultant Subconsultant A Subconsultant B Compensation
First $10,000
First $10,000
Second $50,000
First $10,000
Third $50,000*
* May, in addition, result in removal and debarment of the Subconsultant.
SECTION XLI - PANDEMIC CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE
A. The COUNTY shall require a written plan that illustrates how the CONSULTANT shall
perform up to contractual standards in the event of a pandemic. The COUNTY may require
a copy of the plan at any time prior to or at post-award phase of the Contract. At a
minimum, the pandemic performance plan shall include:
1. Key succession and performance planning if there is a sudden significant decrease
in the CONSULTANT’s workforce.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 46

2. Alternative methods to ensure adequate work force.
3. An updated list of the CONSULTANT’s contacts and organizational chart.
B. In the event of a pandemic, as declared by the Governor of Arizona, U.S. Government
or the World Health Organization (WHO), which makes performance of any term under
this Contract impossible or impracticable, the COUNTY shall have the following rights:
1. After the official declaration of a pandemic, the COUNTY may temporarily place the
Contract(s) on “HOLD,” in whole or in part, if the CONSULTANT cannot perform to the
standards agreed upon in the initial terms.
2. The COUNTY shall not incur any liability if a pandemic is declared and emergency
procurements are authorized by the Chief Procurement Officer pursuant to MC1-353 of
the Maricopa County Procurement Code.
3. Once the pandemic is officially declared over or the CONSULTANT can demonstrate
the ability to perform, the COUNTY, at its sole discretion may reinstate the temporarily
voided Contract(s).
C. The COUNTY, at any time, may request to see a copy of the written plan from the
CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall produce the written plan within 72 hours of the
request.
SECTION XLII - PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
The CONSULTANT’s performance shall be evaluated periodically in accordance with the
schedule set forth in APPENDIX D of this Contract. Final Consultant evaluations for Contracts
executed after July 1, 2015, shall be considered in the future CONSULTANT selection
process as outlined in the Appendix.
SECTION XLIII- CONTRACT COMPLETION
When technical review establishes that all phases of the Contract have been completed to
the satisfaction of the COUNTY, a written concurrence is completed and signed by the
COUNTY to initiate the Contract closeout phase. The CONSULTANT is notified, in writing, of
the final closeout procedure which may include submittal of the final Payment Report,
deliverables and the final audit, if applicable, of the CONSULTANT and all Subconsultant’s
records. The CONSULTANT shall submit all required deliverables as detailed in the Contract.
SECTION XLIV – INFLUENCE
As prescribed in MC1-1203 of the Maricopa County Procurement Code, any effort to influence an
employee or agent to breach the Maricopa County Ethical Code of Conduct or any ethical conduct,
may be grounds for Disbarment or Suspension under MC1-902.
An attempt to influence includes, but is not limited to:
A Person offering or providing a gratuity, gift, tip, present, donation, money, entertainment or
educational passes or tickets, or any type of valuable contribution or subsidy,
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 47

That is offered or given with the intent to influence a decision, obtain a contract, garner favorable
treatment, or gain favorable consideration of any kind.
If a Person attempts to influence any employee or agent of Maricopa County, the Chief
Procurement Officer, or his designee, reserves the right to seek any remedy provided by the
Maricopa County Procurement Code, any remedy in equity or in the law, or any remedy provided
by this contract.
SECTION XXLV - INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
CONSULTANT, at CONSULTANT's own expense, shall purchase and maintain the herein
stipulated minimum insurance from a company or companies duly licensed by the State of Arizona
and possessing a current A.M. Best, Inc. rating of A7. In lieu of State of Arizona licensing, the
stipulated insurance may be purchased from a company or companies, which are authorized to do
business in the State of Arizona, provided that said insurance companies meet the approval of
COUNTY. The form of any insurance policies and forms must be acceptable to COUNTY.
All insurance required herein shall be maintained in full force and effect until all work or service
required to be performed under the terms of the contract is satisfactorily completed and formally
accepted. Failure to do so may, at the sole discretion of COUNTY, constitute a material breach of
this contract.
CONSULTANT’s insurance shall be primary insurance as respects COUNTY, and any insurance
or self-insurance maintained by COUNTY shall not contribute to it.
CONSULTANTS’ certificate(s) shall include all subconsultants as insured under its policies or the
CONSULTANT shall furnish to MCDOT separate certificates and endorsements for each
subconsultant. All coverages for subconsultants shall be subject to the minimum requirements
identified for the consultant. The State of Arizona reserves the right to require complete copies of
all insurance policies required by this Contract at any time.
Any failure to comply with the claim reporting provisions of the insurance policies or any breach of
an insurance policy warranty shall not affect the COUNTY’s right to coverage afforded under the
insurance policies.
The insurance policies may provide coverage that contains deductibles or self-insured retentions.
Such deductible and/or self-insured retentions shall not be applicable with respect to the coverage
provided to COUNTY under such policies. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the
deductible and/or self-insured retention and COUNTY, at its option, may require CONSULTANT to
secure payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions by a surety bond or an irrevocable
and unconditional letter of credit.
COUNTY reserves the right to request and to receive, within 10 working days, certified copies of
any or all of the herein required insurance policies and/or endorsements. COUNTY shall not be
obligated, however, to review such policies and/or endorsements or to advise CONSULTANT of
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 48

any deficiencies in such policies and endorsements, and such receipt shall not relieve
CONSULTANT from, or be deemed a waiver of COUNTY’s right to insist on strict fulfillment of
CONSULTANT’s obligations under this contract.
The insurance policies required by this contract, except Workers’ Compensation, and Errors and
Omissions, shall name COUNTY, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials,
employees, Arizona Department of Transportation, and State of Arizona as Additional Insureds.
The policies required hereunder, except Workers’ Compensation, and Errors and Omissions, shall
contain a waiver of transfer of rights of recovery (subrogation) against COUNTY, its agents,
representatives, officers, directors, officials and employees for any claims arising out of
CONSULTANT’s work or service.
CONSULTANT is required to procure and maintain the following coverages:
1. Commercial General Liability. Commercial General Liability insurance and, if necessary,
Commercial Umbrella insurance with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 for each occurrence,
$4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate, $2,000,000 Personal & Advertising
Injury, and $4,000,000 General Aggregate Limit. The policy shall include coverage for bodily
injury, broad form property damage, personal injury, products and completed operations and
blanket contractual coverage, and shall not contain any provision which would serve to limit
third party action over claims. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the CGL
limiting the scope of coverage for liability arising from explosion, collapse, or underground
property damage.
2. Automobile Liability. Commercial/Business Automobile Liability insurance and, if
unnecessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance with a combined single limit for bodily injury and
property damage of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence with respect to any of the
CONSULTANT’s owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles assigned to or used in performance
of the CONSULTANT’s work or services under this contract.
3. Workers’ Compensation. Workers’ Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed
by federal and state statutes having jurisdiction of CONSULTANT’s employees engaged in the
performance of the work or services under this contract; and Employer’s Liability insurance of
not less than $1,000,000 for each accident, $1,000,000 disease for each employee, and
$1,000,000 disease policy limit.
CONSULTANT waives all rights against COUNTY and its agents, officers, directors and
employees for recovery of damages to the extent these damages are covered by the Workers’
Compensation and Employer’s Liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance obtained by
CONSULTANT pursuant to this agreement.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance. Errors and Omissions insurance and, if
necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance, which will insure and provide coverage for errors
or omissions of the CONSULTANT, with limits of no less than $2,000,000 for each claim.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 49

CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
Prior to commencing work or services under this contract, CONSULTANT shall furnish COUNTY
with Certificates of Insurance in a form acceptable to COUNTY, or formal endorsements as
required by the contract in the form provided by the COUNTY, issued by CONSULTANT’s
insurer(s), as evidence that policies providing the required coverages, conditions and limits
required by this contract are in full force and effect. Such certificates shall identify this contract
number and title.
In the event any insurance policy(ies) required by this contract is (are) written on a “claims made”
basis, coverage shall extend for two years past completion and acceptance of CONSULTANT’s
work or services and as evidenced by annual Certificates of Insurance.
If a policy does expire during the life of the contract, a renewal certificate must be sent to COUNTY
fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration date.
CANCELLATION AND EXPIRATION NOTICE
Insurance required herein shall not expire, be canceled, or materially changed without thirty (30)
days prior written notice to COUNTY.
SECTION XLVI – TITLE VI
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252.42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby
notifies all advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair
opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the
grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.
SECTION XLVII – FORCE MAJEURE
Neither party shall be liable for failure of performance, nor incur any liability to the other party on
account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of this
contract, if such delay or failure is caused by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the
reasonable control and without negligence of the parties. Such events, occurrences, or causes will
include acts of God/nature (including fire, flood, earthquake, storm, hurricane, or other natural
disaster), war, invasion, act of foreign enemies, hostilities (whether war is declared or not), civil
war, riots, rebellion, revolution, insurrection, military or usurped power or confiscation, terrorist
activities, nationalization, government sanction, lockout, blockage, embargo, labor dispute, strike,
and interruption or failure of electricity or telecommunication service.
Each party, as applicable, shall give the other party notice of its inability to perform and particulars
in reasonable detail of the cause of the inability. Each party must use best efforts to remedy the
situation and remove, as soon as practicable, the cause of its inability to perform or comply.
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 50

The party asserting Force Majeure as a cause for non-performance shall have the burden of
proving that reasonable steps were taken to minimize delay or damages caused by foreseeable
events, that all non-excused obligations were substantially fulfilled, and that the other party was
timely notified of the likelihood or actual occurrence which would justify such an assertion, so that
other prudent precautions could be contemplated.
(END OF SECTION)
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 51

In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties herein have executed this Contract.
T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL
By_____________________________
Principal of the Firm
_______________________________
Printed Name
_______________________________
Title
_______________________________
Date
_______________________________
Tax Identification Number
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA
RECOMMENDED BY
By_______________________________
Jennifer Toth, P.E.
Transportation Director/County Engineer
Date______________________________
LEGAL REVIEW ACCEPTED AND APPROVED
Approved as to form and within the
Powers and authority granted under the By_______________________________
Laws of the State of Arizona to Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Maricopa County.
ATTEST
____________________________________ ________________________________________
Deputy County Attorney Clerk of the Board
Date_________________________________ Date___________________________________
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 52

Attachment 1
CONSTRUCTION AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN CONTRACTS
PROMPT PAY AND PAYMENT REPORTING PROVISIONS
** FOR USE ON LPA FEDERAL AID PROJECTS **
(09/20/2016)
MEASUREMENTS AND PAYMENT:
Partial Payments:
If satisfactory progress is being made, the contractor will receive a payment based on the
amount of work completed. Progress payments may be made by the LPA/ Subrecipient
Procurement Office to the contractor on the basis of an approved estimate of the work
performed during a preceding period of time. The progress payments shall be paid on or
before 14 days after the estimate of the work is approved. The estimate of the work shall be
deemed received by the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office on submission to the person
designated by the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office for the submission, review or
approval of the estimate of the work. The LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office by mutual
agreement may make progress payments on contracts of less than 90 days and shall make
monthly progress payments on all other contracts. Payment to the contractor on the basis of
a duly certified and approved estimate of the work performed during the preceding calendar
month under the contract may include payment for material and equipment.
An estimate of the work submitted shall be deemed approved and certified for payment after
seven days from the date of submission unless before that time the LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office or Designee prepares and issues a specific written finding setting forth
those items in detail in the estimate of the work that are not approved for payment under the
contract. The contractor shall work with the LPA/Subrecipient or the LPA/Subrecipient
Designee to finalize monthly estimate. The progress payments shall be paid on or before
14 days after the estimate of the work is certified and approved in accordance with Arizona
Revised Statutes Section 34-221.
The contractor shall pay to the contractor's subcontractors or material suppliers and each
subcontractor shall pay to the subcontractor's subcontractor or material supplier, within
seven days of receipt of each progress payment the respective amounts allowed the
contractor or subcontractor on account of the work performed by the subcontractors, to the
extent of each subcontractor's interest, except that no contract for construction services may
materially alter the rights of any contractor, subcontractor or material supplier to receive
prompt and timely payment.
A subcontractor may notify the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office in writing requesting
that the subcontractor be notified by the Subrecipient Procurement Office in writing within
five days from payment of each progress payment made to the contractor.
Prompt Pay and Payment Reporting Provisions- 1/5

Subcontractor Payments:
(1) Retention:
If the prime contract does not provide for retention, the contractor and each subcontractor of
any tier shall not withhold retention on any subcontract. If the prime contract provides for
retention, the prime contractor and each subcontractor of any tier shall not retain a higher
percentage than the LPA/Subrecipient may retain under the prime contract.
(2) No Set-offs Arising from Other Contracts:
If a subcontractor is performing work on multiple contracts for the same contractor or
subcontractor of any tier, the contractor or subcontractor of any tier shall not withhold or
reduce payment from its subcontractors on the contract because of disputes or claims on
another contract.
(3) Partial Payment:
The contractor and each subcontractor of any tier shall make prompt partial payments to its
subcontractors within seven days of receipt of payment from the LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office. Notwithstanding any provision of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 34-
221, the parties may not agree otherwise.
(4) Final Payment:
The contractor and each subcontractor of any tier shall make prompt final payment to each
of its subcontractors. The contractor and each subcontractor of any tier shall pay all
monies, including retention, due to its subcontractor within seven days of receipt of
payment. Notwithstanding any provision of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 34-221, the
parties may not agree otherwise.
(5) Payment Reporting:
For the purposes of this subsection “Reportable Contracts” means any subcontract, of any
tier, DBE or non-DBE, by which work shall be performed on behalf of the contractor and any
contract of any tier with a DBE material supplier.
The requirements of this subsection apply to all Reportable Contracts.
Payment Reporting for all Reportable Contracts shall be done through the LPA DBE System
which can be accessed at AZ UTRACS on the Arizona Transportation Business Portal at
www.azutracs.com. No later than fifteen calendar days after the preconstruction conference,
the contractor shall log into the system and enter or verify the name, contact information,
and subcontract amounts for Reportable Contracts on the project. As Reportable Contracts
are approved over the course of the contract, the contractor shall enter the subcontractor
information in the LPA DBE System. Reportable contracts information shall be entered into
Prompt Pay and Payment Reporting Provisions- 2/5

the system no later than five calendar days after approval by the LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office.
The contractor shall report on a monthly basis indicating the amounts actually paid and the
dates of each payment under any Reportable Contract on the project. The contractor shall
provide information for payments made on all Reportable Contracts during the previous
month by the last day of the current month. In the event that no payments were made during
a given month, the contractor shall identify that by entering a dollar value of zero. If the
contractor does not pay the full amount of any invoice from a subcontractor, the contractor
shall note that and provide the reasons in the comment section of the Monthly Payment
Audit of the LPA DBE System.
In addition, the contractor shall require that all participants in any Reportable Contract
electronically verify receipt of payment on the contract within 15 days of receipt of electronic
payment notification and the contractor shall actively monitor the system to ensure that the
verifications are input. The contractor shall proactively work to resolve any payment
discrepancies in the system between payment amounts it reports and payment confirmation
amounts reported by others.
The contractor shall ensure that all Reportable Contract payment activity is in the LPA DBE
System. This includes all lower-tier Reportable Contracts.
The contractor shall maintain records for each payment explaining the amount requested by
the subcontractor, and the amount actually paid pursuant to the request, which may include
but are not limited to, estimates, invoices, pay requests, copies of checks or wire transfers,
and lien waivers in support of the monthly payments in the system.
The contractor shall ensure that a copy of this Subsection is included in every Reportable
Contract of every tier.
(a) Sanctions for Inadequate Reporting:
For each Reportable Contract on which the contractor fails to submit timely and complete
payment information the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office will retain $1,000.00 as
liquidated damages, from the monies due to the contractor. Liquidated damages will be
deducted each month for each Reportable Contract on which the contractor fails to submit
payment information until the contractor provides the required information as described
herein. After 90 consecutive days of non-reporting, the liquidated damages will increase to
$2,000.00 for each subsequent month, for each Reportable Contract on which the
contractor fails to report until the information is provided. These liquidated damages shall
be in addition to all other retention or liquidated damages provided for elsewhere in the
contract.
(6) Completion of Work:
A subcontractor's work is satisfactorily completed when all the tasks called for in the
subcontract have been accomplished, documented, and accepted by the LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office.
Prompt Pay and Payment Reporting Provisions- 3/5

(7) Disputes:
If there is a discrepancy between what is reported by the contractor in the LPA DBE System
and what the subcontractor indicates, an alert email will automatically be sent to the
contractor. The email will be sent to the email address provided by the contractor in the
LPA DBE System. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the email address in the
system is kept current.
The contractor shall provide a verifiable explanation of the discrepancy in the LPA DBE
System as early as practicable but in no case later than seven days after the date of the
alert email.
The LPA/Subrecipient will determine whether the contractor has acted in good faith
concerning any such explanations. The LPA/Subrecipient and ADOT BECO reserves the
right to request and receive documents from the contractor and all subcontractors of any
tier, in order to determine whether prompt payment requirements are met.
The contractor shall implement and use the dispute resolution process outlined in the
subcontract or by following the LPA/Subcrecipient escalation process, to resolve payment
disputes.
(8) Non-compliance:
Failure to make prompt partial payment, or prompt final payment including any retention,
within the time frames established above, will result in remedies, as the LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office deems appropriate, which may include but are not limited to:
(a) Liquidated Damages: These liquidated damages shall be in addition to all
other retention or liquidated damages provided for elsewhere in the
contract.
(i) The LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office will withhold two times the
disputed dollar amount not paid to each subcontractor.
(ii) If full payment is made within 30 days of the LPASubrecipient
Procurement Office’s payment to the contractor, the amount withheld by
the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office will be released.
(iii) If full payment is made after 30 days of the LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office’s payment to the contractor, the LPA/Subrecipient
Procurement Office will release 75 percent of the funds withheld. The
LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office will retain 25 percent of the
monies withheld as liquidated damages.
(b) Additional Remedies. If the contractor fails to make prompt payment for
three consecutive months, or any four months over the course of one
Prompt Pay and Payment Reporting Provisions- 4/5

project, or if the contractor fails to make prompt payment on two or more
projects within 24 months, the LPA/Subrecipient Procurement Office may,
in addition, invoke the following remedies:
(i) Withhold monthly progress payments until the issue is resolved and full
payment has been made to all subcontractors, subject to the liquidated
damages described in paragraph (a) above,
(ii) Terminate the contract for default,
(iii) Disqualify the contractor from future bidding, temporarily or
permanently, depending on the number and severity of violations, if
applicable.
In determining whether liquidated damages will be assessed, the extent of the liquidated
damages, or additional remedies assessed, the LPA/Subrecipient will consider whether
there have been other violations on this or other federal-aid contracts, whether the failure to
make prompt payment was due to circumstances beyond the contractor’s control, and other
circumstances. The contractor may, within 15 calendar days of receipt of the decision of the
LPA/Subrecipient, escalate the decision according to the contract’s escalation process.
Prompt Pay and Payment Reporting Provisions- 5/5

Attachment 2
TITLE 49 - TRANSPORTATION
Subtitle A- Office of the Secretary ofTransportation
PART 26 PARTICIPATION BY DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES IN DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
[Code of Federal Regulations]; [Title 49, Volume 1]; [Revised as of October 1, 2008]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access; [CITE: 49CFR26.55]; [Page 300-302]
Subpart C Goals, Good Faith Efforts, and Counting
§26.55 - How is DBE participation counted toward goals?
(a) When a DBE participates in a contract, you count only the value of the work actually performed by the DBE
toward DBE goals.
(1) Count the entire amount of that portion of a construction contract (or other contract not covered by
paragraph (a)(2) of this section) that is performed by the DBE's own forces. Include the cost of supplies
and materials obtained by the DBE for the work of the contract, including supplies purchased or
equipment leased by the DBE (except supplies and equipment the DBE subcontractor purchases or leases
from the prime contractor or its affiliate).
(2) Count the entire amount offees or commissions charged by a DBE firm for providing a bona fide service,
such as professional, technical, consultant, or managerial services, or for providing bonds or insurance
specifically required for the performance of a DOT-assisted contract, toward DBE goals, provided you
determine the fee to be reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees customarily allowed for
similar services.
(3) When a DBE subcontracts part of the work of its contract to another firm, the value of the subcontracted
work may be counted toward DBE goals only if the DBE's subcontractor is itself a DBE. Work that a DBE
subcontracts to a non-DBE firm does not count toward DBE goals.
(b) When a DBE performs as a participant in a joint venture, count a portion of the total dollar value of the
contract equal to the distinct, clearly defined portion of the work of the contract that the DBE performs with
its own forces toward DBE goals.
(c) Count expenditures to a DBE contractor toward DBE goals only if the DBE is performing a commercially useful
function on that contract.
(1) A DBE performs a commercially useful function when it is responsible for execution of the work of the
contract and is carrying out its responsibilities by actually performing, managing, and supervising the
work involved. To perform a commercially useful function, the DBE shall also be responsible, with respect
to materials and supplies used on the contract, for negotiating price, determining quality and quantity,
ordering the material, and installing (where applicable) and paying for the material itself. To determine
whether a DBE is performing a commercially useful function, you shall evaluate the amount of work
subcontracted, industry practices, whether the amount the firm is to be paid under the contract is
commensurate with the work it is actually performing and the DBE credit claimed for its performance of
the work, and other relevant factors.
(2) A DBE does not perform a commercially useful function if its role is limited to that of an extra participant
in a transaction, contract, or project through which funds are passed in order to obtain the appearance
of DBE participation. In determining whether a DBE is such an extra participant, you shall examine similar
transactions, particularly those in which DBEs do not participate.
(3) If a DBE does not perform or exercise responsibility for at least 30 percent of the total cost of its contract
with its own work force, or the DBE subcontracts a greater portion of the work of a contract than would
be expected on the basis of normal industry practice for the type of work involved, you must presume
that it is not performing a commercially useful function.
(4) When a DBE is presumed not to be performing a commercially useful function as provided in paragraph
(c)(3) of this section, the DBE may present evidence to rebut this presumption. You may determine that
BEC04/22/14

the firm is performing a commercially useful function given the type of work involved and normal industry
practices.
(5) Your decisions on commercially useful function matters are subject to review by the concerned operating
administration, but are not administratively appealable to DOT.
(d) Use the following factors in determining whether a DBE trucking company is performing a commercially useful
function:
(1) The DBE shall be responsible for the management and supervision of the entire trucking operation for
which it is responsible on a particular contract, and there cannot be a contrived arrangement for the
purpose of meeting DBE goals.
(2) The DBE shall itself own and operate at least one fully licensed, insured, and operational truck used on
the contract.
(3} The DBE receives credit for the total value of the transportation services it provides on the contract
using trucks it owns, insures, and operates using drivers it employs.
(4) The DBE may lease trucks from another DBE firm, including an owner-operator who is certified as a DBE.
The DBE who leases trucks from another DBE receives credit for the total value of the transportation
services the lessee DBE provides on the contract.
(5) The DBE may also lease trucks from a non-DBE firm, including from an owner-operator. The DBE who
leases trucks from a non-DBE is entitled to credit for the total value of transportation services provided
by non-DBE lessees not to exceed the value of transportation services provided by DBE-owned trucks on
the contract. Additional participation by non-DBE lessees receives credit only for the fee or commission
it receives as a result of the lease arrangement. If a recipient chooses this approach, it shall obtain written
consent from the appropriate Department Operating Ad ministration.
Example to this paragraph (d)(S): DBE Firm X uses two (2) of its own trucks on a contract. It leases two (2)
trucks from DBE Firm Yand six (6) trucks from non-DBE Firm Z. DBE credit would be awarded for the total
value of transportation services provided by Firm X and Firm Y, and may also be awarded for the total
value of transportation services provided by four (4) of the six (6) trucks provided by Firm Z. In all, full
credit would be allowed for the participation of eight (8) trucks. With respect to the other two trucks
provided by Firm Z, DBE credit could be awarded only for the fees or commissions pertaining to those
trucks Firm X receives as a result of the lease with Firm Z.
(6) For purposes of this paragraph (d), a lease shall indicate that the DBE has exclusive use of and control
over the truck. This does not preclude the leased truck from working for others during the term of the
lease with the consent of the DBE, so long as the lease gives the DBE absolute priority for use of the leased
truck. Leased trucks shall display the name and identification number of the DBE.
(e) Count expenditures with DBEs for materials or supplies toward DBE goals as provided in the following:
(1) (i) If the materials or supplies are obtained from a DBE manufacturer, count 100 percent of the cost of
the materials or supplies toward DBE goals.
(ii) For purposes of this paragraph (e)(l), a manufacturer is a firm that operates or maintains a factory
or establishment that produces, on the premises, the materials, supplies, articles, or equipment
required under the contract and of the general character described by the specifications.
(2) (i) If the materials or supplies are purchased from a DBE regular dealer, count 60 percent of the cost of
the materials or supplies toward DBE goals.
(ii} For purposes of this section, a regular dealer is a firm that owns, operates, or maintains a store,
warehouse, or other establishment in which the materials, supplies, articles or equipment of the
general character described by the specifications and required under the contract are bought, kept
in stock, and regularly sold or leased to the public in the usual course of business.
(A) To be a regular dealer, the firm shall be an established, regular business that engages, as its
principal business and under its own name, in the purchase and sale or lease of the products
in question.
(B) A person may be a regular dealer in such bulk items as petroleum products, steel, cement,
gravel, stone, or asphalt without owning, operating, or maintaining a place of business as
provided in this paragraph (e)(2)(ii) if the person both owns and operates distribution
BECO 4/22/14

equipment for the products. Any supplementing of regular dealers' own distribution
equipment shall be by a long-term lease agreement and not on an ad hoc or contract-by­
contract basis.
(C) Packagers, brokers, manufacturers' representatives, or other persons who arrange or
expedite transactions are not regular dealers within the meaning of this paragraph (e)(2).
(3) With respect to materials or supplies purchased from a DBE which is neither a manufacturer nor a
regular dealer, count the entire amount of fees or commissions charged for assistance in the
procurement of the materials and supplies, or fees or transportation charges for the delivery of
materials or supplies required on a job site, toward DBE goals, provided you determine the fees to be
reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees customarily allowed for similar services. Do not
count any portion of the cost of the materials and supplies themselves toward DBE goals, however.
(f) If a firm is not currently certified as a DBE in accordance with the standards of subpart D of this part at the
time of the execution of the contract, do not count the firm's participation toward any DBE goals, except as
provided for in Sec. 26.87(i).
(g) Do not count the dollar value of work performed under a contract with a firm after it has ceased to be certified
toward your overall goal.
(h) Do not count the participation of a DBE subcontractor toward a contractor's final compliance with its DBE
obligations on a contract until the amount being counted has actually been paid to the DBE.
[64 FR 5126, Feb. 2, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 68951, Nov. 15, 2000; 68 FR 35554, June 16, 2003]
BEC04/22/14

APPENDIX A TO 49 CFR PART 26
GUIDANCE CONCERNING GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
NOTE: In the following section of the Federal requirements the "you" means the agency (ADOT).
I. When, as a recipient, you establish a contract goal on a DOT-assisted contract, a bidder must, in order to be
responsible and/or responsive, make good faith efforts to meet the goal. The bidder can meet this
requirement in either of two ways. First, the bidder can meet the goal, documenting commitments for
participation by DBE firms sufficient for this purpose. Second, even if it doesn't meet the goal, the bidder can
document adequate good faith efforts. This means that the bidder must show that it took all necessary and
reasonable steps to achieve a DBE goal or other requirement of this part which, by their scope, intensity, and
appropriateness to the objective, could reasonably be expected to obtain sufficient DBE participation, even if
they were not fully successful.
II. In any situation in which you have established a contract goal, part 26 requires you to use the good faith
efforts mechanism of this part. As a recipient, it is up to you to make a fair and reasonable judgment whether
a bidder that did not meet the goal made adequate good faith efforts. It is important for you to consider the
quality, quantity, and intensity of the different kinds of efforts that the bidder has made. The efforts employed
by the bidder should be those that one could reasonably expect a bidder to take if the bidder were actively
and aggressively trying to obtain DBE participation sufficient to meet the DBE contract goal. Mere proforma
efforts are not good faith efforts to meet the DBE contract requirements. We emphasize, however, that your
determination concerning the sufficiency of the firm's good faith efforts is a judgment call: meeting
quantitative formulas is not required.
Ill. The Department also strongly cautions you against requiring that a bidder meet a contract goal {i.e., obtain a
specified amount of DBE participation) in order to be awarded a contract, even though the bidder makes an
adequate good faith efforts showing. This rule specifically prohibits you from ignoring bona fide good faith
efforts.
IV. The following is a list of types of actions which you should consider as part of the bidder's good faith efforts
to obtain DBE participation. It is not intended to be a mandatory checklist, nor is it intended to be exclusive
or exhaustive. Other factors or types of efforts may be relevant in appropriate cases.
A. Soliciting through all reasonable and available means (e.g. attendance at pre-bid meetings, advertising
and/or written notices) the interest of all certified DBEs who have the capability to perform the work of
the contract. The bidder must solicit this interest within sufficient time to allow the DBEs to respond to
the solicitation. The bidder must determine with certainty if the DB Es are interested by taking appropriate
steps to follow up initial solicitations.
B. Selecting portions of the work to be performed by DBEs in order to increase the likelihood that the DBE
goals will be achieved. This includes, where appropriate, breaking out contract work items into
economically feasible units to facilitate DBE participation, even when the prime contractor might
otherwise prefer to perform these work items with its own forces.
C. Providing interested DBEs with adequate information about the plans, specifications, and requirements
of the contract in a timely manner to assist them in responding to a solicitation.
D. (1) Negotiating in good faith with interested DBEs. It is the bidder's responsibility to make a portion of
the work available to DBE subcontractors and suppliers and to select those portions of the work or
material needs consistent with the available DBE subcontractors and suppliers, so as to facilitate
DBE participation. Evidence of such negotiation includes the names, addresses, and telephone
BEC04/22/14

numbers of DBEs that were considered; a description of the information provided regarding the
plans and specifications for the work selected for subcontracting; and evidence as to why additional
agreements could not be reached for DBEs to perform the work.
(2) A bidder using good business judgment would consider a number of factors in negotiating with
subcontractors, including DBE subcontractors, and would take a firm1s price and capabilities as well
as contract goals into consideration. However, the fact that there may be some additional costs
involved in finding and using DBEs is not in itself sufficient reason for a bidder1s failure to meet the
contract DBE goal, as long as such costs are reasonable. Also, the ability or desire of a prime
contractor to perform the work of a contract with its own organization does not relieve the bidder
of the responsibility to make good faith efforts. Prime contractors are not, however, required to
accept higher quotes from DB Es if the price difference is excessive or unreasonable.
E. Not rejecting DBEs as being unqualified without sound reasons based on a thorough investigation of their
capabilities. The contractor's standing within its industry, membership in specific groups, organizations,
or associations and political or social affiliations {for example union vs. non-union employee status) are
not legitimate causes for the rejection or non-solicitation of bids in the contractor's efforts to meet the
project goal.
F. Making efforts to assist interested DB Es in obtaining bonding, lines of credit, or insurance as required by
the recipient or contractor.
G. Making efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining necessary equipment, supplies, materials, or related
assistance or services.
H. Effectively using the services of available minority/women community organizations; minority/women
contractors' groups; local, state, and Federal minority/women business assistance offices; and other
organizations as allowed on a case-by-case basis to provide assistance in the recruitment and placement
of DBEs.
V. In determining whether a bidder has made good faith efforts, you may take into account the performance of
other bidders in meeting the contract. For example, when the apparent successful bidder fails to meet the
contract goal, but others meet it, you may reasonably raise the question of whether, with additional
reasonable efforts, the apparent successful bidder could have met the goal. If the apparent successful bidder
fails to meet the goal, but meets or exceeds the average DBE participation obtained by other bidders, you
may view this, in conjunction with other factors, as evidence of the apparent successful bidder having made
good faith efforts.
Note: Contacting the Business Engagement and Compliance Office for assistance in identifying certified DBEs that
can perform work on a contract or task order is also considered a strong factor in making good faith efforts.
BEC04/22/14

Attachment 3
Maricopa County Department of Transportation
Consultant Evaluation Program Guidelines
Introduction & Purpose
The Consultant Evaluation Program is a program administered by MCDOT as a means to
monitor and evaluate the quality of work performed on engineering consultant
contracts, and to meet the federal requirement under 23 CFR 172.
A positive approach to the program assures that project schedule, cost, and quality of
design and construction are attainable. This assures that potential problems that may
impact other projects are identified and resolved in a timely manner.
All engineering consultant contracts shall be evaluated annually based on the Notice to
Proceed (NTP) anniversary date by the MCDOT Project Manager, including other
Technical groups in accordance with applicable contract provisions. In addition to
annual evaluations, a final consultant evaluation must be conducted at the end of all
engineering consultant contracts.
Implementation Timeline
This evaluation program will be effective for all engineering consultant contracts with a
Notice to Proceed date of July 1, 2015 or later.
Uses for Consultant Evaluation
Consultant Evaluations will be used for the following purposes:
1. To identify consultant performance strengths and weakness, as well as help
identify, document and resolve performance issues as needed.
2. As one factor or criterion in the selection process for subsequent contracts. Final
evaluations for contracts executed after July 1, 2015 will be used as part of the
selection process. Up to 5 points may be deducted from a consultant score
during the selection process for final evaluation ratings of less than 3 (average
performance) on performance factors of evaluation for projects a firm has
completed for MCDOT over a three year time period.
Evaluation history to be used for selection will include evaluation scores
encompassing the most current three-year period at any given time. The three-

year evaluation history will be maintained for firm contracts executed after July
1, 2015. For example, a firm’s evaluation history in FY 2018 would include
scores from FY 2015 through FY 2018, in FY 2019; the evaluation history would
include FY 2016 through 2019.
MCDOT will deduct points from the scores of submitted Statements of
Qualifications (SOQ) for each firm based on performance rating as follows:
Performance rating of 1 or 2 on 1-2 evaluation factors -1 points
Performance rating of 1 or 2 on 3-4 evaluation factors -2 points
Performance rating of 1 or 2 on 5-6 evaluation factors -3 points
Performance rating of 1 or 2 on 7-8 evaluation factors -4 points
Performance rating of 1 or 2 on 9 or more evaluation factors -5 points
3. As documentation to justify the declaration of a breach of contract for a
consultant’s failure to fulfill terms of the contract or to address problems
identified by MCDOT in the performance of the contract. In order for MCDOT to
take action that could declare a breach of contract, the MCDOT PM or staff must
complete a Consultant Evaluation Form.
Procedure
The MCDOT PM will initiate the completion of consultant evaluation forms for contracts
annually on their NTP anniversary date.
Since evaluations will be used as a factor in the consultant selection process, it is
important for MCDOT PMs, Resident Engineers or other applicable staff to complete
evaluations in a timely manner.
Please adhere to the following general guidelines in completing the consultant
performance evaluation:
1. The Consultation Evaluation Form shall be completed by the MCDOT PM and
shall confer with other MCDOT Project Team members involved in the contract.
The MCDOT PM shall complete the form within 21 calendar days after the NTP
anniversary date and at the end of the contract.
2. When totally completed, the MCDOT PM shall discuss the evaluation with the
consultant. If the consultant disagrees with the evaluation score, the consultant
must provide a written response which shall be attached to the evaluation. The
consultant must also request a meeting with the MCDOT PM to try to resolve
differences. The request for a meeting must be made within 10 calendar days
after receiving the evaluation rating. If the request is not made within 10
calendar days, the score shall be considered final.

3. The Department Evaluation Form shall be completed by the Consultant for
review of MCDOT personnel and returned to the MCDOT Procurement Branch.
4. Both the completed Consultant Evaluation Form and the Department Evaluation
Form shall be filed together in a separate process improvement file in the
MCDOT Procurement Branch.

DocuSign Envelope ID: BFD9DAC0-A5B8-4A2A-9993-378C715944EE
Attachment 4
Maricopa County Department of Transportation
Title VI Assurances
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (herein referred to as the “Recipient”), HEREBY
AGREES THAT, as a condition to receiving any Federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), through Federal Highway Administration and Arizona Department of Transportation,
is subject to and will comply with the following:
Statutory/Regulatory Authorities
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);
• 49 C.F.R. Part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination In Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of
Transportation—Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);
• 28 C.F.R. section 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964);
The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as the “Acts” and “Regulations,”
respectively.
General Assurances
In accordance with the Acts, the Regulations, and other pertinent directives, circulars, policy, memoranda
and/or guidance, the Recipient hereby gives assurances that it will promptly take any measures necessary to
ensure that:
“No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded
from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any
program or activity,” for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance from DOT,
including the Federal Highway Administration.
The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the original intent of Congress, with respect to Title VI
and other Non-discrimination requirements (The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973), by restoring the broad, institutional-wide scope and coverage of these non-
discrimination statutes and requirements to include all programs and activities of the Recipient, so long as
any portion of the program is Federally assisted.

DocuSign Envelope ID: BFD9DAC0-A5B8-4A2A-9993-378C715944EE
Specific Assurances
More specifically, and without limiting the above general Assurance, the Recipient agrees with and gives the
following Assurances with respect to its Federal Aid Highway Program.
1. The Recipient agrees that each “activity,” “facility,” or “program,” as defined in §§ 21.23 (b) and
21.23 (e) of 49 C.F.R. § 21 will be (with regard to an “activity”) facilitated, or will be (with regard to
a “facility”) operated, or will be (with regard to a “program”) conducted in compliance with all
requirements imposed by, or pursuant to the Acts and the Regulations.
2. The Recipient will insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For
Proposals for work, or material subject to the Acts and the Regulations made in connection with all
Federal Aid Highway Program and, in adapted form, in all proposals for negotiated agreements
regardless of funding source:
“The Maricopa County Department of Transportation, in accordance with the provisions of
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252.42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d-4) and the
Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract
entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be
afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be
discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an
award.”
3. The Recipient will insert the clauses of Appendix A and E of this Assurance in every contract or
agreement subject to the Acts and the Regulations.
4. The Recipient will insert the clauses of Appendix B of this Assurance, as a covenant running with
the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property,
structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a Recipient.
5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility or part of a
facility, the Assurance will extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection
therewith.
6. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance in the form, or for the acquisition of
real property or an interest in real property, the Assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or
under such property.
7. That the Recipient will include the clauses set forth in Appendix C and Appendix D of this
Assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, licenses, permits, or
similar instruments entered into by the Recipient with other parties:

DocuSign Envelope ID: BFD9DAC0-A5B8-4A2A-9993-378C715944EE
a. for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable
activity, project, or program; and
b. for the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired
or improved under the applicable activity, project or program.
8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is
extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form
of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in
which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient, or any transference for the longer of the following
periods:
a. the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial
assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or
benefits; or
b. the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property.
9. The Recipient will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the
Secretary of Transportation or the official whom he/she delegates specific authority to give
reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors,
subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal
financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the
Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.
10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any
matter arising under the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.
By signing this ASSURANCE, Maricopa County Department of Transportation also agrees to comply (and
require any sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, successors, transferees, and/or assignees to comply)
with all applicable provisions governing Federal Highway Administration or Arizona Department of
Transportation access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff. You also recognize
that you must comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted
by the Federal Highway Administration or Arizona Department of Transportation. You must keep records,
reports, and submit the material for review upon request to Federal Highway Administration, Arizona
Department of Transportation, or its designee in timely, complete, and accurate way. Additionally, you must
comply with all other reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by law or
detailed in program guidance.

DocuSign Envelope ID: BFD9DAC0-A5B8-4A2A-9993-378C715944EE
Maricopa County Department of Transportation gives this ASSURANCE in consideration of and for
obtaining any Federal grants, loans, contracts, agreements, property, and/or discounts, or other Federal-aid
and Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the recipients by the U.S. Department of
Transportation under the Federal Highway Administration and Arizona Department of Transportation. This
ASSURANCE is binding on Arizona, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors,
subcontractors and their subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest, and any other participants in the
Federal Aid Highway Program The person(s) signing below is authorized to sign this ASSURANCE on
behalf of the Recipient.
Maricopa County Department of Transportation
(Name of Recipient)
8/4/2020
by _____________________________________________ DATED ________________________
(Signature of Authorized Official)
Attachments
Appendices A, B, C, D, E

DocuSign Envelope ID: BFD9DAC0-A5B8-4A2A-9993-378C715944EE
APPENDIX A
During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest
(hereinafter referred to as the “contractor”) agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations: The contractor (hereinafter includes consultants) will comply with the
Acts and the Regulations relative to Non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration or the Arizona Department of
Transportation, as they may be amended from time to time, which are herein incorporated by reference
and made a part of this contract.
2. Nondiscrimination: The contractor, with regard to the work performance by it during the contract, will
not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of
subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor will not
participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Acts and the Regulations,
including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in
Appendix B of 49 CFR Part 21.
3. Solicitations for Subcontractors, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all
solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be
performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each
potential subcontractor or supplier will be notified by the contractor of the contractor’s obligations under
this contract and the Acts and Regulations relative to Non-discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or
national origin.
4. Information and Reports: The contractor will provide all information and reports required by the Acts,
the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto and will permit access to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the Recipient, the
Federal Highway Administration or Arizona Department of Transportation to be pertinent to ascertain
compliance with such Acts, Regulations, and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor
is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the contractor will
so certify to the Recipient, the Federal Highway Administration, or Arizona Department of
Transportation, as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a contractor's noncompliance with the Non-discrimination
provisions of this contract, the Recipient will impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Highway
Administration or Arizona Department of Transportation, may determine to be appropriate, including, but
not limited to:
a. withholding payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies;
and/or
b. cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part.
6. Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs one through six in
every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the
Acts, the Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor will take action with respect
to any subcontract or procurement as the Recipient, the Federal Highway Administration, or Arizona
Department of Transportation may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for
noncompliance. Provided, that if the contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation by a
subcontractor or supplier because of such direction, the contractor may request the Recipient to enter into
any litigation to protect the interests of the Recipient. In addition, the contractor may request the United
States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

DocuSign Envelope ID: BFD9DAC0-A5B8-4A2A-9993-378C715944EE
APPENDIX B: CLAUSES FOR DEEDS TRANSFERRING UNITED
STATES PROPERTY
The following clauses will be included in deeds effecting or recording the transfer of real property,
structures, or improvements thereon, or granting interest therein from the United States pursuant to the
provisions of Assurance 4.
NOW, THEREFORE, the U.S. Department of Transportation as authorized by law and upon the condition that
Maricopa County Department of Transportation will accept title to the lands and maintain the project constructed
thereon in accordance with Title 23, United States Code the Regulations for the Administration of Federal Aid for
Highways, and the policies and procedures prescribed by the Arizona Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration and the U.S. Department of Transportation in accordance and in compliance with all
requirements imposed by Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A,
Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S. Department of
Transportation pertaining to and effectuating the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat.
252;42 42 U.S.C. § 2000d to 2000d-4), does hereby remise, release, quitclaim and convey unto the Maricopa
County Department of Transportation all the right, title and interest of the U.S. Department of Transportation in
and to said lands described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
(HABENDUM CLAUSE)
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said lands and interests therein unto Maricopa County Department of Transportation
and its successors forever, subject, however, to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein
contained as follows, which will remain in effect for the period during which the real property or structures are
used for a purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the
provision of similar services or benefits and will be binding on the Maricopa County Department of
Transportation, its successors and assigns.
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation, in consideration of the conveyance of said lands and
interests in lands, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land for itself, its successors
and assigns, that (1) no person will on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination with regard to any facility
located wholly or in part on, over, or under such lands hereby conveyed [.] [and]* (2) that the Maricopa County
Department of Transportation will use the lands and interests in lands and interests in lands so conveyed, in
compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non-discrimination in Federally-
assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, and as said Regulations and Acts may be amended, [and (3) that in the event of breach of any of the above-
mentioned non-discrimination conditions, the Department will have a right to enter or re-enter said lands and
facilities on said land, and that above described land and facilities will thereon revert to and vest in and become
the absolute property of the U.S. Department of Transportation and its assigns as such interest existed prior to this
instruction].*
*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in
order to make clear the purpose of Title VI.

DocuSign Envelope ID: BFD9DAC0-A5B8-4A2A-9993-378C715944EE
APPENDIX C: CLAUSES FOR TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY
ACQUIRED OR IMPROVED UNDER THE ACTIVITY, FACILITY, OR
PROGRAM
The following clauses will be included in deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instruments entered
into by the Maricopa County Department of Transportation pursuant to the provisions of Assurance
7(a):
A. The (grantee, lessee, permittee, etc. as appropriate) for himself/herself, his/her heirs, personal
representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby
covenant and agree [in the case of deeds and leases add “as a covenant running with the land”] that:
1. In the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the property
described in this (deed, license, lease, permit, etc.) for a purpose for which a U.S. Department
of Transportation activity, facility, or program is extended or for another purpose involving
the provision of similar services or benefits, the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc.) will
maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all requirements imposed
by the Acts and Regulations (as may be amended) such that no person on the grounds of race,
color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be
otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities,
B. With respect to licenses, leases, permits, etc., in the event of breach of any of the above
Nondiscrimination covenants, Maricopa County Department of Transportation will have the right to
terminate the (lease, license, permit, etc.) and to enter, re-enter, and repossess said lands and facilities
thereon, and hold the same as if the (lease, license, permit, etc.) had never been made or issued.*
C. With respect to licenses, leases, permits, etc., in the event of breach of any of the above
Nondiscrimination covenants, Maricopa County Department of Transportation will have the right to
enter or re-enter the lands and facilities thereon, and the above described lands and facilities will
there upon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the Maricopa County
Department of Transportation and its assigns*.
*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary to
make clear the purpose of Title VI.

DocuSign Envelope ID: BFD9DAC0-A5B8-4A2A-9993-378C715944EE
APPENDIX D: CLAUSES FOR CONSTRUCTION/USE/ACCESS TO
REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED UNDER THE ACTIVITY, FACILITY OR
PROGRAM
The following clauses will be included in deeds, licenses, permits, or similar instruments/agreements
entered into by Maricopa County Department of Transportation pursuant to the provisions of
Assurance 7(b):
A. The (grantee, licensee, permittee, etc., as appropriate) for himself/herself, his/her heirs, personal
representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby
covenant and agree (in the case of deeds and leases add, “as a covenant running with the land”) that
(1) no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in,
denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that
in the construction of any improvements on, over, or under such land, and the furnishing of services
thereon, no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from
participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the
(grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee etc.) will use the premises in compliance with all other
requirements imposed by or pursuant to the Acts and Regulations, as amended set forth in this
Assurance.
B. With respect to (licenses, leases, permits, etc.), in the event of breach of any of the above
Nondiscrimination covenants, Maricopa County Department of Transportation will have the right to
terminate the (license, permit, etc., as appropriate) and to enter or re-enter or re-enter and repossess
said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said (license, permit, etc., as appropriate)
had never been made or issued.*
C. With respect to deeds, in the event of breach of any of the above Non-discrimination covenants,
Maricopa County Department of Transportation will there upon revert to and vest in and become the
absolute property of Maricopa County Department of Transportation and its assigns.*
*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary
in order to make clear the purpose of Title VI.

DocuSign Envelope ID: BFD9DAC0-A5B8-4A2A-9993-378C715944EE
APPENDIX E
During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in
interest (hereinafter referred to as the “contractor”) agrees to comply with the following
nondiscrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to:
Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities:
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin): and 49 CFR Part 21.
• The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. §
4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because
of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects);
Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of
sex);
• Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits
discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27;
The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), (prohibits
discrimination on the basis of age);
Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 USC § 471, Section 47123), as amended,
(prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex);
• The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and
applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or
activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and
contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded
or not);
• Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of
disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of
public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12189) as implemented by
Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38;
• The Federal Aviation Administration’s Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § 47123) (prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex);
• Executive Order 12898, which ensures discrimination against minority populations by discouraging
programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority and low-income populations;
• Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency,
and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of
limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable
steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to
74100);
• Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from
discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1687 et seq).

Attachment 5
MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE)
Intended Participation Affidavit- Summary
Contra ct No.: 2021-016 TRACS No. MMA-0(281)D ModNo.: ______ TaskNo.: _______ _
ConsultantName:T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL AZUTRACS RegistrationNo.: _1_1_14_4 ________ _
DBELiaisonName:James ------------------- Barr Contact Phone Number: ------------- (602) 565-4590
Contractor Task Amount: $3,201,750.00 ContractDBEGoal%: 3.7s--------------
Note: Total Contract/Task Amount must inclu de the original and any additional amountappl i edto the Contractor Task Order.
A B C D E F G
Vendor Total Contract/ Total Amount Performing DBE
DBE Firm Name Type Work Description Task Amount Adjustments Toward DBE at Least
Goal 30%?Y/N
Ethos Engineering Geotechnical Investigation and
Subconsu lta Report $93,012.00 $23,164.00 $69,848.00 YES
Y2K Engineering Traffic Design
Subconsulta $ 230,962.00 $0.00 $ 230,962.00 YES
J2 Engineering and Subconsulta Drainage and Lansdcape, Irrigation, $ 376,446.00 $0.00 $ 376,446.00 YES
Environmental Design D Aesthetics
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
(HJ Total Amount Toward DBE Goal $ 677,256.00
(I) Total % of DBE Commitment 21.15%
(JJ Contract DBE Goal % 3.75
By signature below, the undersigned agrees that formal agreements/subcontracts with the I isted DBE firms will occur for the work cited
herein should this contract be awarded.
James Barr Vice President
(Na me of Principal/Officer) (Title)
James Barr 02/04/2021
(Principal/Officer Signature) (Date)
Page 1 of 2
BECO LPA FORM 3206PS (Rev. 8/1/2019)


ADOT MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE {DBE)
Intended Participation Affidavit Refer to instructions
on Page 2
Prime Contractor: T.Y. LIN International Project Na me: Northern Pkwy, 99th Ave to 87th Ave
Contract No.: 202l-Ol6 TRACS No.: MMA-0(2Bl)D Mod No.: Task No.: --------
DBE Fi rm Na me: Ethos Engineering, LLC AZ UTRACS Registration No.: _1_0 _36_ 3 ____ _
Type of Fi rm:[]consultant 12) Subconsultant([]Lower-tier Subconsultantl[)Vendor IC] Broker (Fees/Commission)
1. The undersigned is prepared to perform the following scope(s) of work on the above referenced project.
• Total Contract/Task Amount must include the original and any additional amount applied to the Contract or Task Order
• DBE firm listed above mustcompleteat least 30%of its own contract amount
A 8 C D E
NAICS Code Work Description Total Contract/ Adjustments Total Amount
Task Amount Toward DBE Goal
541330 Geotechnical lnvestigtion $93,012.00 $23,164.00 $69,848.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
Total Amount Toward DBE Goal: $ 69,848.00
2. (Broker Only) The undersigned affirms that the amount of fees and commissions for work quotedaboveareas follows:
Tota I Contract Amount: --------- Fees/Commissions Assessed on Award: ______ _
3. The undersigned will sublet and/or award $ 2 3,164.00 of work bid to a non-DBE firm.
Fi rm Na me(s): Roadsafe and Law Enforcement Specialists
4. The undersigned will sublet and/or award $ 28,211.00 of work to another certified DBE firm. (Attach signed DBE affidavit.)
Fi rm Name(s): _A_c_s_s_e _rv_ic_e_s ___________________________________ _
Confirmation of Participation
By signature below, the undersigned agrees to enter into a formal agreement/subcontract for the work cited herein should this
contract/task be awarded.
1, Keith Dahlen, Principal confirm that --------------------- Ethos Engineering, LLC
(Authorized DBE firm officer, print name and title) (Name of DBE firm)
will be participating intheabove project.
The DBE firm wi11 be performing the scope as described abovefor a DBE credit ------------------ of $41,637.00
(Total Amount Toward DBE Goal)
Keith Dahlen Digitally Date: 2021.02.12 signed by 15:59:54 Keith Dahlen -07'00' 02/12/2021
(Authorized DBE firm officer, Signature) (Date)
BECO LPA FORM 3205PS ( Rev. 8-1-2019) Pagel of2


Attachment 6

Attachment 7
MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Submit completed GFE Form (pages 1 – 6 only) with backup documentation, if any)
General
Complete all sections of the form and include all back-up documentation. Incomplete forms will be returned unprocessed. For the
purpose of this form, project specific contracts shall be evaluated on a contract basis and on-call contracts will be evaluated on a task
order by task order basis. For on-call contracts, consultants must complete this form by detailing efforts made to find additional
DBEs if their current DBEs are unable to perform the work needed for this task order. If the information does not relate to the task
order in review, this GFE will be denied. The Agency reserves the right to request further documentation from the Consultant/
Subconsultant(s) to support and validate actions undertaken to secure DBE participation to meet the DBE goal for this contract/task
order.
Attestation
I, (Name) , do hereby acknowledge that I am the (Title)
of (Name of Firm) and the Consultant selected for the Agency project listed below:
Task Total DBE Percentage
Mod
Contract No. No. Order TRACS No. Project Name Contract/Task Contract Committed
No. Amount * Goal Goal
* Total Contract/Task Amount must include any previous amounts of the Contract or Task Order.
Provide a brief summary on why you believe your firm is unable to meet the DBE participation goals on this contract/task order.
Attach additional pages if necessary.
I hereby certify I demonstrated comprehensive good faith efforts to solicit and utilize DBE firms to meet the DBE participation
requirements of this contract/task order in accordance with Section 14.0 of the LPA DBE Contract Specifications by my responses to
the following:
GFE Activities
1. Contacting Agency and BECO For Assistance
Date contacted: Agency Staff contacted: Phone Number:
Prime Contact Name: BECO Staff contacted: Phone Number:
Brief summary of discussion and resolution:
Was a DBE Supportive Services Solicitation Request submitted? Yes No Submission Date
1
BECO Form 3203PS (Rev. 1-4-2017)

MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Submit completed GFE Form (pages 1 – 6 only) with backup documentation, if any)
2. Market Research and Soliciting Through All Reasonable Means
List all DBE solicitations made for this contract/task order.
Solicitation Activity Date Name of Interested DBEs Follow-Up Date
3. Selecting Portions of Work to be Performed by DBEs
List work items needed to be performed and include how work items were broken down into economically feasible units to
facilitate DBE participation.
4. Provide Interested DBEs With Project Information
Explain how interested DBEs were provided with access to project information.
2
BECO Form 3203PS (Rev. 1-4-2017)

MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Submit completed GFE Form (pages 1 – 6 only) with backup documentation, if any)
5. Negotiate In Good Faith With Interested DBEs – When a non-DBE is selected over a DBE, attach copies of the DBE and non-DBE
firms’ quotes.
A. Identify DBE firms in which negotiations were considered but were unsuccessful.
DBE Firm Name & Contact Person Address Phone Number
B. Explain why negotiations above were unsuccessful.
DBE Firm Name Explanation
6. Having Sound Reason For Rejecting DBEs
Explain why any DBE(s) was rejected for being unqualified.
DBE Firm Name Explanation
3
BECO Form 3203PS (Rev. 1-4-2017)

MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Submit completed GFE Form (pages 1 – 6 only) with backup documentation, if any)
7. Assisting Interested DBEs – Bonding, Credit, Insurance
Identify interested DBE firms in which assistance was provided in obtaining bonding, credit or insurance.
DBE Firm Name Assistance Offered
8. Assisting Interested DBEs – Equipment, Supplies, Materials, Related Services
Identify interested DBE firms in which assistance was provided in obtaining necessary equipment, supplies, materials, or related
assistance or services.
DBE Firm Name Assistance Offered
9. Minority/Women Community Organizations
Identify minority/women community organizations used for providing assistance in the recruitment and placement of DBEs.
Organization Name Contact Person Assistance Requested
4
BECO Form 3203PS (Rev. 1-4-2017)

MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Submit completed GFE Form (pages 1 – 6 only) with backup documentation, if any)
This is not intended to be a mandatory checklist nor is it intended to be an exclusive or exhaustive list of good faith efforts. Other
factors or types of efforts may be relevant on a case-by-case basis as determined by ADOT BECO.
10. Other comments or information you want the Agency and ADOT BECO to consider as part of your good faith effort.
Affidavit
The undersigned, (Name) ______________________________________, attest and declare under penalty of perjury in the second
degree, and any other applicable state or federal laws, that the information provided on this certificate is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
SIGN
Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ________________________________
Consultant Representative/DBE Liaison
Note: The GFE form must be signed by an authorized signatory for the Consultant/Subconsultant.
AGENCY/BECO INTERNAL USE ONLY
Date Received: _________________ Received by: _________________________________________
SIGN
Date Approved / Denied: _________________ (Circle one) Signature: __________________________________________
Date Received: _________________ Received by: _________________________________________
Date Approved / Denied: _________________ (Circle one) Signature: __________________________________________
Comments:
5
BECO Form 3203PS (Rev. 1-4-2017)

MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Submit completed GFE Form (pages 1 – 6 only) with backup documentation, if any)
APPENDIX A TO PART 26 — GUIDANCE CONCERNING GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Note: “YOU” means the Agency (ADOT) in the following sections of this requirement.
I. When, as a recipient, you establish a contract goal on a DOT-assisted contract for procuring construction, equipment,
services, or any other purpose, a bidder must, in order to be responsible and/or responsive, make sufficient good faith efforts
to meet the goal. The bidder can meet this requirement in either of two ways. First, the bidder can meet the goal,
documenting commitments for participation by DBE firms sufficient for this purpose. Second, even if it doesn't meet the goal,
the bidder can document adequate good faith efforts. This means that the bidder must show that it took all necessary and
reasonable steps to achieve a DBE goal or other requirement of this part which, by their scope, intensity, and appropriateness
to the objective, could reasonably be expected to obtain sufficient DBE participation, even if they were not fully successful.
II. In any situation in which you have established a contract goal, Part 26 requires you to use the good faith efforts mechanism of
this part. As a recipient, you have the responsibility to make a fair and reasonable judgment whether a bidder that did not
meet the goal made adequate good faith efforts. It is important for you to consider the quality, quantity, and intensity of the
different kinds of efforts that the bidder has made, based on the regulations and the guidance in this Appendix.
The efforts employed by the bidder should be those that one could reasonably expect a bidder to take if the bidder were
actively and aggressively trying to obtain DBE participation sufficient to meet the DBE contract goal. Mere pro forma efforts
are not good faith efforts to meet the DBE contract requirements. We emphasize, however, that your determination
concerning the sufficiency of the firm's good faith efforts is a judgment call. Determinations should not be made using
quantitative formulas.
III. The Department also strongly cautions you against requiring that a bidder meet a contract goal (i.e., obtain a specified
amount of DBE participation) in order to be awarded a contract, even though the bidder makes an adequate good faith efforts
showing. This rule specifically prohibits you from ignoring bona fide good faith efforts.
IV. The following is a list of types of actions which you should consider as part of the bidder's good faith efforts to obtain DBE
participation. It is not intended to be a mandatory checklist, nor is it intended to be exclusive or exhaustive. Other factors or
types of efforts may be relevant in appropriate cases.
A. (1) Conducing market research to identify small business contractors and suppliers and soliciting through all reasonable
and available means the interest of all certified DBEs that have the capability to perform the work of the contract.
This may include attendance at pre-bid and business matchmaking meetings and events, advertising and/or written
notices, posting of Notices of Sources Sought and/or Requests for Proposals, written notices or emails to all DBEs
listed in the State's directory of transportation firms that specialize in the areas of work desired (as noted in the DBE
directory) and which are located in the area or surrounding areas of the project.
(2) The bidder should solicit this interest as early in the acquisition process as practicable to allow the DBEs to respond
to the solicitation and submit a timely offer for the subcontract. The bidder should determine with certainty if the
DBEs are interested by taking appropriate steps to follow up initial solicitations.
B. Selecting portions of the work to be performed by DBEs in order to increase the likelihood that the DBE goals will be
achieved. This includes, where appropriate, breaking out contract work items into economically feasible units (for
example, smaller tasks or quantities) to facilitate DBE participation, even when the prime contractor might otherwise
prefer to perform these work items with its own forces. This may include, where possible, establishing flexible
timeframes for performance and delivery schedules in a manner that encourages and facilitates DBE participation.
6
BECO Form 3203PS (Rev. 1-4-2017)

MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Submit completed GFE Form (pages 1 – 6 only) with backup documentation, if any)
C. Providing interested DBEs with adequate information about the plans, specifications, and requirements of the contract in
a timely manner to assist them in responding to a solicitation with their offer for the subcontract.
D. (1) Negotiating in good faith with interested DBEs. It is the bidder's responsibility to make a portion of the work
available to DBE subcontractors and suppliers and to select those portions of the work or material needs consistent
with the available DBE subcontractors and suppliers, so as to facilitate DBE participation. Evidence of such
negotiation includes the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of DBEs that were considered; a description of
the information provided regarding the plans and specifications for the work selected for subcontracting; and
evidence as to why additional Agreements could not be reached for DBEs to perform the work.
(2) A bidder using good business judgment would consider a number of factors in negotiating with subcontractors,
including DBE subcontractors, and would take a firm's price and capabilities as well as contract goals into
consideration. However, the fact that there may be some additional costs involved in finding and using DBEs is not
in itself sufficient reason for a bidder's failure to meet the contract DBE goal, as long as such costs are reasonable.
Also, the ability or desire of a prime contractor to perform the work of a contract with its own organization does not
relieve the bidder of the responsibility to make good faith efforts. Prime contractors are not, however, required to
accept higher quotes from DBEs if the price difference is excessive or unreasonable.
E. (1) Not rejecting DBEs as being unqualified without sound reasons based on a thorough investigation of their
capabilities. The contractor's standing within its industry, membership in specific groups, organizations, or
associations and political or social affiliations (for example union vs. non-union status) are not legitimate causes for
the rejection or non-solicitation of bids in the contractor's efforts to meet the project goal. Another practice
considered an insufficient good faith effort is the rejection of the DBE because its quotation for the work was not
the lowest received. However, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to require the bidder or prime
contractor to accept unreasonable quotes in order to satisfy contract goals.
(2) A prime contractor's inability to find a replacement DBE at the original price is not alone sufficient to support a
finding that good faith efforts have been made to replace the original DBE. The fact that the contractor has the
ability and/or desire to perform the contract work with its own forces does not relieve the contractor of the
obligation to make good faith efforts to find a replacement DBE, and it is not a sound basis for rejecting a
prospective replacement DBE's reasonable quote.
F. Making efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining bonding, lines of credit, or insurance as required by the recipient or
contractor.
G. Making efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining necessary equipment, supplies, materials, or related assistance or
services.
H. Effectively using the services of available minority/women community organizations; minority/women contractors'
groups; local, State, and Federal minority/women business assistance offices; and other organizations as allowed on a
case-by-case basis to provide assistance in the recruitment and placement of DBEs.
V. In determining whether a bidder has made good faith efforts, it is essential to scrutinize its documented efforts. At a
minimum, you must review the performance of other bidders in meeting the contract goal. For example, when the
apparent successful bidder fails to meet the contract goal, but others meet it, you may reasonably raise the question of
whether, with additional efforts, the apparent successful bidder could have met the goal. If the apparent successful
bidder fails to meet the goal, but meets or exceeds the average DBE participation obtained by other bidders, you may
view this, in conjunction with other factors, as evidence of the apparent successful bidder having made good faith efforts.
As provided in §26.53(b)(2)((vi), you must also require the contractor to submit copies of each DBE and non-DBE
subcontractor quote submitted to the bidder when a non-DBE subcontractor was selected over a DBE for work on the
contract to review whether DBE prices were substantially higher; and contact the DBEs listed on a contractor's solicitation
7
BECO Form 3203PS (Rev. 1-4-2017)

MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Submit completed GFE Form (pages 1 – 6 only) with backup documentation, if any)
to inquire as to whether they were contacted by the prime. Pro forma mailings to DBEs requesting bids are not alone
sufficient to satisfy good faith efforts under the rule.
VI. A promise to use DBEs after contract award is not considered to be responsive to the contract solicitation or to constitute
good faith efforts.
[79 FR 59600, Oct. 2, 2014]
Note: Contacting ADOT BECO (602 712-7761) for assistance in identifying certified DBEs that can perform work on a contract or
task order is also considered a strong factor in making good faith efforts.
8
BECO Form 3203PS (Rev. 1-4-2017)

MCDOT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/DESIGN
CERTIFICATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS
Submit completed GFE Form (pages 1 – 6 only) with backup documentation, if any)
Good Faith Efforts Tips
The intent of the Good Faith Effort Form is to document the good faith efforts undertaken by the Consultant in soliciting and utilizing
DBE firms to meet the DBE participation requirements for the contract/project. The completed form will assist the Agency and ADOT
in determining if the Consultant performed its due diligence, took all necessary and reasonable steps to secure DBE participation for
the referenced contract/project and resulted in obtaining comprehensive good faith efforts. The Agecny and ADOT Business
Engagement & Compliance Office (BECO) will determine if the Consultant made satisfactory good faith efforts to secure sufficient
DBE participation to meet the DBE goal. The burden of proof rests with the Consultant. Failure to provide good faith efforts to
ADOT BECO’s satisfaction will result in the rejection of the proposal/modification. However, ADOT BECO will reconsider
Consultant’s GFE resubmittal if Consultant has adequately and sufficiently documented its good faith efforts in obtaining DBE
participation.
Tips for Documenting Good Faith Efforts
1. Review Scope of Work (SOW) for subcontracting opportunities.
2. Make reasonable efforts to designate economically feasible and meaningful units of work for a DBE(s) that meets or
exceeds the DBE goal.
3. Keep in mind that selected DBEs must perform commercially useful function (CUF) as required by 49 CFR §26.55.
4. Determine if there are DBE firms on the contract team that can do the work. If not, the Consultant must solicit other DBEs
through the DBE Directory to perform work to meet or exceed the goal.
5. Some projects may be too small or do not provide meaningful units of work for subcontracting opportunities. Any reason
for this must be thoroughly explained.
6. When providing good faith documentation, it is not good enough to say that project is too small to include DBEs.
Consultants must explain the project SOW and why no subcontracting opportunities are possible.
7. Consultants must keep in mind that DBEs must be utilized when developing their SOWs and cost proposal. Arranging and
planning work items to circumvent the utilization of Subconsultants and DBEs violates the federal regulations.
8. For on-call contracts, consultants must complete this form by detailing efforts made to find additional DBEs if their current
DBEs are unable to perform the work needed for this task order.
9. When providing good faith documentation, Consultants must include:
a. Date, contact name of staff they contacted at BECO for assistance
b. List of DBE firms contacted to do the work
c. Any evidence of negotiations with the DBE firms
d. Evidence of efforts to reach out to DBE firms
10. Assistance provided to DBEs should include efforts to assist the DBE firms in obtaining bonding, lines of credit, insurance,
equipment, materials, supplies or other project-related assistance.
9
BECO Form 3203PS (Rev. 1-4-2017)

Attachment 8
CERTIFICATION OF FINAL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PAYMENTS
Professional Services Contracts
Clear
(Submit one form for each DBE involved in the contract)
The undersigned consultant on Agency Project No: ADOT TRACS No: __________________ herby,
certifies that full payment was made, to the firm indicated for material and/or work performed under this project's contract as follows:
DBE FIRM AZ UTRACS Vendor Registration #
Name of DBE Firm was paid the amount of
This certificate is made under Federal and State Laws concerning false statement. Supporting documentation for this
payment is subject to audit and should be retained for a minimum of three years from project acceptance date. In the
event the DBE was not paid in accordance with affidavits submitted by the prime consultant, all documentation
supporting the consultant's position should be submitted.
I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS
THAT THE STATEMENT MADE ON THIS DOCUMENT ARE TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
Consultant Company Name:
Check One: Prime Consultant Sub Consultant
Name: Title:
Signature:
Date:
The undersigned sub consultant/supplier/manufacturer for the above named project hereby certified that payments
were received and/or justification by consultant is correct.
I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS
THAT THE STATEMENT MADE ON THIS DOCUMENT ARE TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
DBE Firm Name:
Check One: Sub Consultant/Supplier/Manufacturer Lower-tier Sub Consultant/Supplier/Manufacturer
Name: Title:
Signature:
Date:
3210PS - LPA 1.3.2017

ATTACHMENT 9
PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT OF ALL CLAIMS
ENGINEERING CONTRACTS
__ hereby certifies to the Maricopa County Department of
Transportation
(Name of Signer)
(MCDOT) that all lawful claims for labor, rental of equipment, material used, and any other
claims by T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL or its subconsultants in connection with the project
described in MCDOT Contract No. 2021-016, have been paid.
T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL understands that with receipt of payment for any previously
invoiced amounts, plus any retained monies, that this is a settlement of all claims of every nature
and kind against MCDOT arising out of the performance of MCDOT’s Contract No. 2021-016
relating to the material, equipment and work covered in and required by the contract.
The undersigned hereby certifies that to his/her knowledge, no contractual disputes exist in regard
to this contract and that he/she has no knowledge of any pending or potential claims in regard to
this contract.
Upon submission of this document and a separate invoice for any retained funds to MCDOT,
invoice processing will be completed within sixty (60) calendar days.
State of Arizona )
)§
County of Maricopa )
Signed this _______ day of , 20 .
Signature
Title
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of , 20
.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 61

Attachment ACORD ® 10 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE (MMIDD/VYVY)
3/1/2021 1/11/2021
THIS CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATE DOES IS NOT ISSUED AFFIRMATIVELY AS A MATTER OR OF NEGATIVELY INFORMATION AMEND, ONLY EXTEND AND CONFERS OR ALTER NO RIGHTS THE COVERAGE UPON THE AFFORDED CERTIFICATE BY HOLDER. THE POLICIES THIS
REPRESENTATIVE BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OR PRODUCER, OF INSURANCE AND THE CERTIFICATE DOES NOT HOLDER. CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
If IMPORTANT: SUBROGATION It the IS certificate WAIVED, subject holder Is to an the ADDITIONAL terms and conditions INSURED, the of the pollcy(les) policy, certain must have policies ADDITIONAL may require INSURED an endorsement. provisions or A statement be endorsed. on
this certificate does not confer rlahts to the certificate holder In lieu of such CONTACT endorsement(s).
PRODUCER 444 Lockton W. 47th Companies Street, Suite 900 /Air' PHONE NAME: ..,_ c_.\, I ;.t Nol:
Kansas (816) 960-9000 City MO 64112-1906 E-MAIL ADDRESS:
INSURER/SI AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC#
INSURED INSURER A: National Fire Insurance Co of Hartford 20478
1482103 345 T. Y. CALIFORNIA LIN INTERNATIONAL STREET, SUITE 2300 INSURER INSURER c: B : V;:, The 11,,.v Continental Vr,rnp Insnr;:,nce Insurance r,.,m,v>nv Comnanv 20 35289 508
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104 INSURER D :American Casualty Company ofReading, PA 20 427
INSURER E: * ** SEE ATTACHMENT * * *
COVERAGES MAIN CERTIFICATE NUMBER· 1728 5 127 INSURER F: REVISION NUMBER· xxxxxxx
THIS INDICATED. IS TO CERTIFY NOTWITHSTANDING THAT THE POLICIES ANY REQUIREMENT, OF INSURANCE TERM LISTED OR CONDITION BELOW HAVE OF BEEN ANY CONTRACT ISSUED TO OR THE OTHER INSURED DOCUMENT NAMED ABOVE WITH RESPECT FOR THE POLICY TO WHICH PERIOD THIS
EXCLUSIONS CERTIFICATE AND MAY CONDITIONS BE ISSUED OF OR SUCH MAY PERTAIN, POLICIES. THE LIMITS INSURANCE SHOWN MAY AFFORDED HAVE BEEN BY REDUCED THE POLICIES BY PAID DESCRIBED CLAIMS. HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE '···-- ADDL '·· SUB6 ·- POLICY NUMBER .,:aM& .: i LIMITS
A .x COMMERCIAL CLAIMS-MADE GENERAL [i] LIABILITY OCCUR y y 6056538518 3/1/2020 3/1/2021 EACH t OCCURRENCE 9c ,7,;' ____ $ $ 1.000 1.000 000 000
,...._ s.. ͆ SEVERABILITY MED EXP (Any one person} s 15.000
X CLAUSE PERSONAL & ADV INJURY s 1000 000
GEN•L POLICY AGGREGATE [x] LIMIT t8r APPLIES □ LOG PER: ͇ PRODUCTS· GENERAL AGGREGATE COMP/OP AGG s $ 2 2.000 000 000 000
C - AUTOMOBILE OTHER: LIABILITY y y 6045854867 3/1/2020 3/1/2021 fE͈͉͍͊͋͌ llNGLE LIMIT $ $ 1000 000
x_ ANY OWNED AUTO - SCHEDULED BODILY BODILY INJURY INJURY (Per (Per accident) person) $ xxxxxxx xxx:xx:x:x
AUTOS AUTOS HIRED ONLY ONLY I- AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS ONLY ipr:,͎͏ .;,\1͐ ,?AMAGE $ $ :xx:xxxxx
$ xxxxxxx
B X UMBRELLA EXCESS UAB LIAB NOCCUR CLAIMS-MADE N N 6056538549 3/1/2020 3/1/2021 AGGREGATE EACH OCCURRENCE s $ 2 2 000 000 000 000
D WORKERS ANO EMPLOYERS' OED COMPENSATION I I RETENTION$ LIABILITY YIN N 6056808508 3/1/2020 3/l/2021 X I f TUTT' I I OTH- ER $ xxxxxxx
A OFFICER/MEMBER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE EXCLUDED? [ill NIA 6056809061 3/1/2020 3/1/2021 E.L. EACH ACCIDENT s 1.000 000
gm: (Mandatory f PTto in NH} o1oPERATIONS below E.L. E.L. DISEASE· DISEASE· POLICY EA EMPLOYEE LIMIT s s 1.000 1000 000 000
E LIABILITY PROFESSIONAL N N SEE ATTACHMENT 11/1/2020 l 1/1/2021 ANNUAL $2,000,000 AGGREGATE PER CLAIM; $2,000,000
RE: DESCRIPTION PROJECT OF NUMBER: OPERATIONS/ PROJECT LOCATIONS NO. I VEHICLES TT0372 PROJECT (ACORD 101, NAME: Additional NORTHERN Remarks Schedule, PARKWAY: may be attached 99TH AVENUE if more space TO is 87TH required} AVENUE FINAL DESIGN.
MARICOPA RESPECTS GENER.AL COUNTY, ITS LTABTUTY REPRESENTATIVES, AND AUTO LIABILITY, OFFICERS, IF DIRECTORS, REQUIRED BY OFFICIALS, WRITTEN AND CONTRACT. EMPLOYEES WAIVER ARE OF ADDITIONAL SUBROGATION INSUREDS APPLIES AS TO
GENERAL LIABILITY AND AUTO LIABILITY WHERE ALLOWED BY STATE LAW AND IF REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION See Attachment
MARICOPA 17285127 CONTRACT COUNTY NO. 2021-016 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO THE SHOULD EXPIRATION ANY OF THE DATE ABOVE THEREOF, DESCRIBED NOTICE POLICIES WILL BE CANCELLED BE DELIVERED BEFORE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
© 1988 015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

Attachment Code: D584190 Master ID: 1482103, Certificate ID: 17285127
T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PROFESSION AL LIABIL 1Y
11/1/2020 -11/1/2021
S2,000,000 PER CLAIM/ S2,000,000 AGGREGATE
PRIMARY PROFESSIONAL LIABILl1Y $2,000,000 PER CLAIM; S2,000.000 AGGREGATE LLOYD'S OF LONDON 62.50% GLROPR21021 65
ASPEN SPECIAL1Y INSURANCE COMPANY 25% LROOJUH20
STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE CO 12.5% 1 000633900202

ATTACHMENT 11
Maricopa County Small Business Enterprise Program
Participation Reporting Form
This form is to be submitted with each pay application or invoice. Any pay application or invoice
without this form attached is subject to rejection as not being a completed pay application or
invoice pursuant to the terms of the contract.
_____________________________ ___________________________________
Name of Prime Consultant/Contractor Contract No.
_____________________________ ___________________________________
Contact Person Project No.
_____________________________ $__________________________________
Street Address Amount of this Pay Application/Invoice
_____________________________
City, State ZIP
Complete below with information on the SBE firms utilized as subconsultants/subcontractors for
this pay application/invoice. If work was self-performed and your firm, as the prime, is an SBE
firm pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1001, et seq., then you may list your firm as the SBE firm.
SBE Firm Name SBE Firm Address Type of Work $ Pd to SBE this
Performed App/Inv
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
□A mark in this box certifies that no SBE firms were utilized as the prime, subconsultant
or subcontractor with respect to this pay application/invoice.
Date: ___________________ ______________________________________
Signature
___________________________________________
Printed Name & Telephone Number
Contract No. 2021-016 Page 63

EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99th AVENUE TO 87TH
AVENUE, FINAL DESIGN

Scope of Services – Project
Specific
Final Design Services
NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH
AVENUE
Consultant: T.Y. Lin International
Project No: TT0372
Contract No.: 2021-016
TRACS No.: T0233 01D/03D
Federal Aid No.: MMA-0(281)D
Maricopa County
Department of Transportation
2901 W. Durango Street
Phoenix, AZ 85009
FEBRUARY 2021

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Table of Contents
SCOPE OF SERVICES – NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE ........... 6
Project Overview .................................................................................................................................... 6
Project Location .................................................................................................................................. 6
Project Background ............................................................................................................................ 6
Project Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 6
Length of Services .................................................................................................................................. 6
SECTION 100 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................... 6
100.1 Project Work Plan ............................................................................................................ 6
100.1.3 Matrix of Responsibilities ................................................................................................ 6
100.1.4 Matrix of Deliverables ..................................................................................................... 7
100.1.5 Communication Plan ....................................................................................................... 8
100.2 Project Initiation ............................................................................................................. 10
100.3 Kick-Off Meeting ........................................................................................................... 10
100.3.1 Schedule and Prepare for Kick-Off Meeting ................................................................... 10
100.4 Design Criteria ............................................................................................................... 11
100.6 Project Progress Meetings .............................................................................................. 11
100.6.4 Progress Meetings ................................................................................................................ 11
100.8 Field Walk with Project Team ........................................................................................ 11
100.9 Project Implementation and Master Schedule ................................................................. 12
100.12 Project Administration .................................................................................................... 12
100.13 Quality Assurance/Control .............................................................................................. 12
SECTION 200 DATA ACQUISITION ............................................................................................. 12
200.1 Project Research/Data Collection ................................................................................... 12
200.1.1 Photo Log ........................................................................................................................ 12
200.1.2 As-Built/Record Drawings .............................................................................................. 12
200.1.3 Prior Studies and Documentation ................................................................................... 13
200.1.4 Improvement Plans ......................................................................................................... 13
200.1.5 Technical Reports ........................................................................................................... 13
200.1.6 Utility As-Builts/Records Drawings ................................................................................ 13
200.1.7 Right-of-Way ................................................................................................................... 13
200.1.8 Traffic Data ..................................................................................................................... 13
200.2 Review Acquired Data .................................................................................................... 13
200.3 Identify Additional Information Needs ........................................................................... 13
200.4 Site Visit and Project Research ....................................................................................... 13
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 2 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
SECTION 300 SURVEY AND MAPPING ....................................................................................... 14
300.1 Results of Survey, Section Control, Exst. R/W Base Map ............................................. 14
300.1.1 Request Aerial Mapping.................................................................................................. 14
300.2 Establish Coordinate System per RDM .......................................................................... 14
300.3 Supplemental Field Survey ............................................................................................. 14
SECTION 400 PROJECT COORDINATION ................................................................................. 14
400.1 Stakeholder Meetings ..................................................................................................... 14
400.1.1 Agenda ............................................................................................................................ 15
400.1.2 Attendance ....................................................................................................................... 15
400.1.3 Meeting Notes ................................................................................................................. 15
400.2 Public Involvement Plan ................................................................................................ 15
400.3 Public Involvement Activities ........................................................................................ 15
400.5 Public Meeting Summary and Comments ..................................................................... 15
400.6 60% Public Project Update Activity and Feedback ....................................................... 15
400.7 95% Public Outreach Materials ..................................................................................... 15
400.8 Project Specific Partnering Special Provisions .............................................................. 15
400.10 Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA) ........................................................................... 15
SECTION 500 UTILITIES AND RAILROAD ................................................................................ 16
500.1 Verification of Existing Utility Base Map ...................................................................... 16
500.2 Utility and Railroad Conflict Identification .................................................................... 16
500.2.1 Utility Potholing ................................................................................................................... 16
500.2.2 Utility Adjustments and Relocations .................................................................................... 16
500.3 Utility Prior Rights .......................................................................................................... 16
500.4 Utility Company Review ................................................................................................ 16
500.5 Pothole Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections ....................................................... 17
500.10 Proposed Utility Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections ......................................... 17
500.11 Utility Relocation Plans .................................................................................................. 17
500.12 Private Irrigation Relocation Plans ................................................................................. 17
500.13 Utility Special Provisions................................................................................................ 17
500.14 Utility Relocation Cost Estimates ................................................................................... 17
500.15 Utility and Railroad Agreements .................................................................................... 18
500.16 Utility Clearance Letter ................................................................................................... 18
500.17 Utility Coordination Meetings ........................................................................................ 18
500.17.1 Agenda ............................................................................................................................... 18
500.17.2 Attendance .......................................................................................................................... 18
500.17.3 Meeting Notes .................................................................................................................... 18
500.18 General Utility Coordination .......................................................................................... 18
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 3 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
SECTION 600 ENVIRONMENTAL................................................................................................. 18
600.1 Environmental ................................................................................................................. 18
SECTION 800 TECHNICAL MEMORANDA AND REPORTS....................................................... 19
800.1 Traffic Analysis Report ................................................................................................... 19
800.2 Drainage Report ............................................................................................................. 19
800.3 Structures Report ............................................................................................................ 19
800.4 Geotechnical and Pavement Design Report .................................................................... 19
800.6 Utilities Report ................................................................................................................ 19
800.8 Wall Selection Report ..................................................................................................... 19
800.9 Lighting Design Report ................................................................................................... 19
SECTION 900 RIGHT OF WAY .......................................................................................................... 20
900.1 Right-of-Way .................................................................................................................. 20
SECTION 1100 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE ...................................................... 20
1100.1 60 % Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development ................................................. 20
1100.1.1 Typical Section Design & Plan Development .................................................................... 20
1100.1.2 Roadway Design & Plan Development .............................................................................. 20
1100.1.3 Driveway Detail Design & Plan Development .................................................................. 20
1100.1.4 Intersection Detail Sheets Design & Plan Development.................................................... 21
1100.1.5 Detail Sheets Design & Plan Development ........................................................................ 21
1100.1.6 Drainage Design & Plan Development ............................................................................. 21
1100.1.7 Structures Design & Plan Development ............................................................................ 21
1100.1.8 Private Irrigation Design & Plan Development ................................................................ 21
1100.1.9 City Owned Utility Relocation Design & Plan Development ............................................ 21
1100.1.10 Landscape Architectural and Erosion Control Design and Plan Development .............. 22
1100.1.11 Maintenance of Traffic Design and Plan Development ................................................... 22
1100.1.12 Traffic Signal Design and Plan Development .................................................................. 22
1100.1.13 Intelligent Transportation System (Adaptive) Design and Plan Development ................ 22
1100.1.14 Roadway and Underdeck Lighting Design and Plan Development ................................. 22
1100.1.15 Signing and Pavement Marking Design and Plan Development ..................................... 22
1100.1.16 Special Provisions ............................................................................................................ 22
1100.1.17 Construction Cost Estimates ............................................................................................ 23
1100.2 60 % PS&E Submittal .................................................................................................... 23
1100.3 95 % Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development ................................................. 23
1100.4 95 % PS&E Submittal .................................................................................................... 23
1100.5 100 % Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development ............................................... 23
1100.6 100 % PS&E Submittal .................................................................................................. 23
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 4 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
1100.7 Sealed Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development............................................... 23
1100.8 Constructability Review ................................................................................................. 23
1100.9 Construction Phasing ..................................................................................................... 23
1100.10 Sealed PS&E Submittal ................................................................................................. 24
1100.11 Project Submittals .......................................................................................................... 24
SECTION 1300 BIDDING PHASE ....................................................................................................... 25
1300.6 Preparation of Addenda ................................................................................................. 25
SECTION 1400 CONSTRUCTION PHASE ........................................................................................ 25
1400.1 Pre-Construction Conference ......................................................................................... 25
1400.2 Requests for Information (RFIs) .................................................................................... 25
List of Tables
Table 1 – Matrix of Responsibilities .......................................................................................................... 7
Table 2 – Matrix of Deliverables ............................................................................................................... 7
Table 3 – Contact Table ............................................................................................................................. 8
Table 4 – Project Submittals Table .......................................................................................................... 24
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 5 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
SCOPE OF SERVICES – NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH
AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE
Project Overview
Project Location
The project is located along Northern Parkway between 99th Avenue and 87th Avenue including the Loop
101 traffic interchange within ADOT’s right-of-way and access control. The project is within Maricopa
County, the Cities of Glendale and Peoria, and the Tohono O’Odham Nation. Improvements along
Hayward Avenue, 99th Avenue, 91st Avenue, and 89th Avenue are also included.
Project Background
The Northern Parkway segment between 99th Avenue and 87th Avenue is part of the overall 12.5-mile
Northern Parkway regional west to east connector from SR 303L to US 60 (Grand Avenue). The Northern
Parkway Overall Program is a collaboration of multiple agencies including Maricopa County, Luke Air
Force Base, MAG, ADOT, FCDMC, and the Cities of Glendale, Peoria, and El Mirage. This project will
improve the area near the SR 101L and ultimately tie into additional planned improvements along
Northern Parkway to the west and east.
In addition, the project will need to coordinate with, and incorporate improvements being developed by,
active adjacent development. Specifically, the development of the parcel(s) located at the southwest
corner of the Northern Parkway and SR 101L interchange may require ‘frontage road’ improvements
along the SR 101L Southbound on-ramp. Our team will closely coordinate with the developer team,
project partners, ADOT and others as necessary to ensure that the improvements proposed and designed
by the development team are compatible and do not adversely impact the proposed TT0372 project
improvements.
Project Purpose
The purpose of this project is to develop federally biddable construction contract documents (plans,
specifications, estimates and other required technical reports) in accordance with the Federal Highway
Administration standards to obtain funding and advertise the project for construction. The scope of work
presented herein is based on the information supplied by MCDOT in the Scope of Services for the design
of Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue.
Length of Services
The contract time is 1,888 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to Proceed (NTP).
SECTION 100 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
100.1 Project Work Plan
The Consultant shall establish a project management system and work plan for schedule and budget
control and shall be responsive to input from MCDOT. The Consultant shall maintain a master project
documentation file.
100.1.3 Matrix of Responsibilities
Table 1 depicts the division of responsibilities between the Consultant, MCDOT, and other involved
stakeholders such as sub-consultants, utility providers, etc. for the project deliverables. Table 1 is intended
as a quick reference; however, if the written scope and this Table have conflicts, the written scope shall
take precedence.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 6 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Table 1 – Matrix of Responsibilities
Scope
Item Consultant MCDOT Other (Identify)
Section
100 Project Management X X
200 Data Acquisition X X
300 Survey and Mapping X
400 Project Coordination X X X (MakPro)
500 Utilities and Railroad X X
600 Environmental X X (Aztec)
X (Ethos, B&N, J2,
800 Technical Memoranda and Reports X
Y2K)
900 Right of Way X X X (Wood Patel)
X (Aztec, Ethos,
1100 Plans, Specifications and Estimate X
B&N, J2, Y2K)
1300 Bidding Phase X X
X (Aztec, Ethos,
1400 Construction Phase X X
B&N, J2, Y2K)
100.1.4 Matrix of Deliverables
Table 2 depicts the deliverables required for the project. The Consultant shall use MicroStation (Open
CONNECT series) to develop CADD deliverables and will use MCDOT’s CADD Standards.
Table 2 – Matrix of Deliverables
FINAL DESIGN PHASE
95% 100%
60% PS&E PS&E PS&E Sealed
Supplier Milestone Submittal Item Submittal Submittal Submittal PS&E
DTM, Base Map {Supplemental
Land Survey Survey} F
Roadway Plans (see Cost Proposal for
Roadway Summary) P F FR S
Cross Sections (see Cost Proposal for
Roadway Summary) P F FR FR
Drainage Plans (see Cost Proposal for
Drainage Summary) P F FR S
Maintenance of Traffic Plans (see Cost
Traffic Proposal for Summary) P F FR S
Signing & Pavement Marking Plans
Traffic (see Cost Proposal for Summary) P F FR S
ITS Plans (see Cost Proposal for
Traffic Summary) P F FR S
Traffic Signal Plans (see Cost Proposal
Traffic for Summary) P F FR S
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 7 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
FINAL DESIGN PHASE
95% 100%
60% PS&E PS&E PS&E Sealed
Supplier Milestone Submittal Item Submittal Submittal Submittal PS&E
Lighting Plans (see Cost Proposal for
Traffic Summary) P F FR S
Walls and Box Culvert Extension
Structures Plans (see Cost Proposal for Summary) P F FR S
Utility Relocation Plans (see Cost
Utility Proposal for Summary) P S
Landscape, SWPPP Plans (see Cost
Landscape Proposal for Summary) P F FR S
Environmental EA Reevaluation F FR S
Drainage Drainage Report P F FR S
Roadway Earthwork Report P F FR S
Materials/ Geotechnical and Pavement Design
Geotechnical Report F FR S
Traffic Traffic Analysis Report S
Lighting Lighting Design Report F FR S
Estimates Quantities and Cost Estimate P F FR S
Contract Time and Construction
Estimates Schedule P F FR S
All Designers Final Design Calculations P F FR S
All Designers CADD Files (graphic, ascii, dtm, etc.) P F FR S
Project
Management Project Master Schedule P F FR S
I = Initial P = Preliminary F = Final FR = Final Revised S = Sealed
100.1.5 Communication Plan
Table 3 is a listing of project team members anticipated to have significant involvement with the project
Scoping. Their role in the project and contact information is provided as well.
Table 3 – Contact Table
Phone
Name Role Agency Email Address
Number
MCDOT Project Team
602-506-
Nicolaas Swart Project Sponsor MCDOT Nicolaas.Swart@maricopa.gov
0599
Project
602-506-
Randy Dunsey Management MCDOT Randy.Dunsey@maricopa.gov
2166
Manager
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 8 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Phone
Name Role Agency Email Address
Number
602-506-
Ben Markert Project Manager MCDOT Ben.Markert@maricopa.gov
8651
Roadway Design 602-506-
Marty Robbins MCDOT Marty.Robbins@maricopa.gov
Lead 5356
602-506-
Bassem Naba Drainage MCDOT Bassem.Naba@maricopa.gov
1713
602-506-
John Ashley Survey MCDOT John.Ashley@maricopa.gov
8647
Marinela Papa Environmental 602-506-
MCDOT Marinela.PapaKonomi@maricopa.gov
Konomi Lead 3994
602-506-
Philip Loftis Natural Resources MCDOT Philip.Loftis@maricopa.gov
3994
602-506-
Sara Ferland Cultural Resources MCDOT Sara.Ferland@maricopa.gov
8082
602-506-
Brian Neves Traffic Lead MCDOT Brian.Neves@maricopa.gov
4626
602-506-
Raj Thoutam Traffic Design MCDOT Rajanikanth.Thoutam@maricopa.gov
8940
602-506-
Efren Guevara Traffic Signals MCDOT Efren.Guevara@maricopa.gov
8660
602-506-
April Wire ITS MCDOT April.Wire@maricopa.gov
7174
602-506-
Denise Lacey Planning MCDOT Denise.Lacey@maricopa.gov
6172
602-506-
Tony Delsol Maintenance MCDOT Tony.Delsol@maricopa.gov
8687
Geotech and 602-506-
John Shi MCDOT John.Shi@maricopa.gov
Pavement Design 8658
Utilities 602-506-
Brent Scott MCDOT Brent.Scott@maricopa.gov
Coordinator 8649
Right-of-way 602-506-
Pat Mertz MCRED Pat.Mertz@maricopa.gov
Supervisor 4639
602-506-
Mitch Wagner Intergovernmental MCDOT Mitch.Wagner@maricopa.gov
5858
602-506-
Dave Hopper Construction MCDOT Dave.Hopper@maricopa.gov
2882
602-506-
Jimmy Camp Structures MCDOT Jimmy.Camp@maricopa.gov
4880
Stakeholders
Transportation City of 623-930-
Purab Adabala PAdabala@glendaleaz.com
Planning Glendale 2926
City Traffic 623-773-
Chris Lemka City of Peoria Chris.Lemka@peoriaaz.gov
Engineer 7260
623-773-
Benjamin Wilson Civil Engineer City of Peoria Benjamin.Wilson@peoriaaz.gov
7185
Assistant City City of El 623-876-
Bryce Christo bchristo@elmirageaz.gov
Engineer Mirage 2974
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 9 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Phone
Name Role Agency Email Address
Number
Tafwachi C. Project 602-712-
ADOT tkatapa@azdot.gov
Katapa Management 7614
Scott Brunner Traffic ADOT sbrunner@azdot.gov
Matt Tolman Real Estate ADOT mtolman@azdot.gov
Design Team
Principal-In- 480-333-
Dan Heller TYLI Dan.Heller@tylin.com
Charge 4171
480-333-
James Barr Project Manager TYLI James.Barr@tylin.com
4405
Deputy PM/Project 480-356-
Brenan Poe TYLI Brenan.Poe@tylin.com
Engineer 0694
480-333-
Jim Pyne Structural Engineer TYLI Jim.Pyne@tylin.com
4157
Diverging
Burgess & 602-244-
David Lenzer Diamond Design David.Lenzer@burgessniple.com
Niple 8142
Engineer
602-438-
Jeff Holzmeister Drainage Engineer J2 jholzmeister@j2design.us
2221
602-380-
Chris Williams Traffic Engineer Y2K cwilliams@y2keng.com
8686
Environmental 602-454-
Justin Hoppmann Aztec jhoppmann@aztec.us
Lead 0402
100.2 Project Initiation
The overall project will be managed by a Project Manager (PM) from the MCDOT Project Management
Branch. The PM put together the overall Project Work Plan (PWP). The PM will submit the scope,
schedule, and budget to the PRC for approval. The Consultant will initiate the project upon approval.
100.3 Kick-Off Meeting
At the beginning of the project, a kick-off meeting will be held (likely virtually) and shall include the PM,
Project Team, Design Team, Consultant, and any other necessary parties.
100.3.1 Schedule and Prepare for Kick-Off Meeting
The Consultant shall work with PM and staff to schedule a project kick-off meeting following the NTP
to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be responsible for preparing the kick-off meeting agenda,
presentation, handout/visual material, attending and facilitating the kick-off meeting, and submitting notes
of the meeting to MCDOT. MCDOT will schedule the meeting and review meeting material and notes.
100.3.1.2 Agenda
The Consultant shall send a meeting agenda to the PM a minimum of 24-hours prior to the meeting
occurrence for distribution to the Project Team.
100.3.1.3 Attendance
The Consultant shall prepare a sign-in sheet and mark all attendees present at the kick-off meeting. The
PM will provide the attendance list from the virtual meeting. This attendance list shall be incorporated
into the sign-in sheet and sent to MCDOT with the meeting notes.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 10 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
100.3.1.4 Meeting Notes
The Consultant shall prepare and send meeting notes to the PM within five (5) business days of the actual
meeting occurrence for review. The PM shall be responsible for distributing the meeting notes after the
PM’s review and approval. Meeting attendees shall have an additional five (5) business days to comment
on the submitted meeting notes, after which time the notes will be considered final.
100.4 Design Criteria
The Consultant shall use the design criteria provided in the Scope of Services for the design of Northern
Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue provided by MCDOT and the design criteria established during the
Scoping Design Report for the Northern Parkway Corridor to develop the construction documents for this
project.
100.6 Project Progress Meetings
The Consultant shall work with MCDOT staff to schedule and attend progress meetings during the
duration of the final design phase for this project. These meetings include, but are not limited to, progress
meetings, comment resolution meetings, and coordination meetings with the technical groups and other
stakeholders.
100.6.4 Progress Meetings
Progress meetings will be held on a monthly basis throughout the design process. The Consultant shall
plan and attend these meetings. Stakeholder progress meetings shall generally be held once a month while
the project is active. During the land right acquisition portions these monthly meetings will not be
required. An estimated thirty (30) meetings are anticipated based on the project schedule. All meetings
will last approximately one hour. The Consultant will have a minimum of two (2) representatives in
attendance at each meeting. Meetings are anticipated to occur virtually prior to September 1, 2021 and at
MCDOT offices at 2901 W. Durango Street, Phoenix, Arizona for the remainder of the project.
100.6.4.1 Agenda
The Consultant shall be responsible for preparing the meeting agenda, exhibits, handouts, attending and
facilitating the meetings, and submitting notes of the meeting to MCDOT. All meeting agendas shall be
sent to the PM a minimum of 24-hours prior to the meeting occurrence for distribution to the Project
Team.
100.6.4.2 Attendance
The Consultant shall prepare a sign-in sheet and mark all attendees present at progress meetings. The
PM will provide the attendance list from the virtual meeting. This attendance list shall be incorporated
into the sign-in sheet and sent to MCDOT with the meeting notes.
100.6.4.3 Meeting Notes
All meeting notes shall be sent to the PM within five (5) business days of the actual meeting occurrence
for review. The PM shall be responsible for distributing the meeting notes after the PM’s review and
approval. Meeting attendees shall have an additional five (5) business days to comment on the submitted
meeting notes, after which time the notes will be considered final.
100.8 Field Walk with Project Team
The Project Team will visit the field site to acquaint key personnel with the details and features of the
project and to gather input on issues, concerns and opportunities. The team will be notified of field walk
dates at least two weeks prior to the visit. The field walk is anticipated to take 4 hours. Three (3)
representatives from Consultant are anticipated to be in attendance.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 11 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
100.9 Project Implementation and Master Schedule
The Consultant shall prepare a Project Schedule which describes the project master schedule and
interrelated tasks to be completed for the project’s proposed improvements, including all major milestone
submittals. Consultant shall update the project schedule regularly over the course of the project’s design
duration.
100.12 Project Administration
This task includes the administrative and coordination tasks required for coordinating the work of the
team members with MCDOT staff and other project stakeholders. This task coordinates and administers
the day-to-day operations of the project, including organizing and filing project data and communication
files, responding to project correspondence including emails, preparation of regular monthly progress
reports, performance of monthly budget updates, and schedule monitoring. This task also includes the
management of sub-consultants, interfacing and communication necessary to keep stakeholders fully and
accurately informed.
100.13 Quality Assurance/Control
The Consultant shall be responsible for the development of a Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control
(QC) plan. The Consultant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the plans and related
design prepared under the contract and shall check all such material accordingly. The Consultant shall
have a quality control plan in effect during the entire time work is being performed under the contract.
The plan shall establish a process whereby plans, calculations and documents submitted for review shall
be clearly marked as being fully checked by a qualified individual other than the originator. The plan
shall address checking procedures, training of employees in quality requirements, and methods of
monitoring and documenting quality control activities including reviewing all documents for
conformance. The QA/QC plan shall include, at a minimum, such elements as checklists of items to
reviewed prior to each submittal, the procedures for conducting QA/QC activities, and the person(s)
responsible for QA/QC activities at each step of project development. PDM Quality Control Checklist
items that are not applicable (N/A) will be identified in the QA/QC plan. Sub-consultant work that is
used shall be reviewed by the Consultant for compliance with this Scope of Services, prior to submittal
for review by MCDOT.
The Consultant shall submit the quality control plan to MCDOT for approval within five (5) working
days of receipt of written NTP. Non-compliance will be sufficient cause for rejection of submittal.
Periodic Quality Control audits may be performed by the Project Manager.
SECTION 200 DATA ACQUISITION
200.1 Project Research/Data Collection
The Consultant shall collect and document existing data relevant to the project. This is anticipated to
include the CADD files, traffic, drainage, and other technical reports completed during the Scoping Phase.
The Consultant shall maintain a log of all data collected.
200.1.1 Photo Log
The Consultant shall compile a photo log of the project features and site.
200.1.2 As-Built/Record Drawings
The Consultant shall obtain as-builts or record drawings of the existing site facilities.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 12 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
200.1.3 Prior Studies and Documentation
The Consultant shall obtain all prior studies and accompanying documentation that are relevant to the
project area. MCDOT shall provide documentation from the previous Scoping phase, including CADD
files.
200.1.4 Improvement Plans
The Consultant shall coordinate with the Project Manager to obtain all improvement plans that are
related to the project.
200.1.5 Technical Reports
The Consultant shall obtain all technical reports pertaining to the projects or features within the project
limits.
200.1.6 Utility As-Builts/Records Drawings
MCDOT shall obtain as-builts or record drawings of all existing utility features within the project limits
and provide to Consultant. MCDOT will obtain utility base file in CADD (dgn format) via on-call
contractor performing utility designation and potholing.
200.1.7 Right-of-Way
The Consultant shall coordinate with MCDOT and the Maricopa County Real Estate Department
(MCRED) to obtain/verify Right-of-Way mapping to overlay with MCDOT provided aerial imagery.
MCRED will verify the Right-of-Way base map developed during the Scoping phase and provide it to the
Consultant.
200.1.8 Traffic Data
Subconsultant, Burgess & Niple (B&N), shall be responsible for gathering all information relating to
traffic data within the project limits, including but not limited to prior traffic studies, traffic reports, current
Average Daily Traffic (ADT), projected future ADT and collision reports.
200.2 Review Acquired Data
The Consultant shall review all the data acquired and maintain the available data. The Consultant shall
provide MCDOT the acquired data at the project completion or before, as requested.
200.3 Identify Additional Information Needs
The Consultant shall identify any additional information needs beyond the minimum requirements listed
in this section. The Consultant shall also identify additional data needs based on a review of the acquired
data.
200.4 Site Visit and Project Research
The Consultant shall conduct two (2) site visits over the duration of the project to observe current site
conditions and design issues within the project limits. The Consultant shall comply with applicable local,
state and public laws for the safety and health of its employees as well as those set forth in the Scope of
Services for the design of Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue, provided by MCDOT.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 13 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
SECTION 300 SURVEY AND MAPPING
300.1 Results of Survey, Section Control, Exst. R/W Base Map
MCDOT will provide CADD files of the project area topographic survey for this project. Survey and data
acquisition shall comply with Section 4.5 of the MCDOT RDM and this Scope of Services. The
Consultant shall verify all data, documentation, and information provided by MCDOT.
MCDOT will provide a geometrically controlled survey, identifying section corners, quarter section
quarters, Geodetic Densification and Cadastral Survey (GDACS) control points, and other control points
that may impact the design. MCDOT will survey full sections within the project boundary. MCDOT will
locate and identify all monuments within the project limits.
300.1.1 Request Aerial Mapping
The Consultant shall request aerial mapping of the project area from MCDOT. The Consultant may use
aerial mapping techniques and provide mapping in a digital format for use in project base maps in
Microstation format.
300.2 Establish Coordinate System per RDM
MCDOT will provide data in ground coordinates that are tied to state plane coordinates in North
American Datum (NAD) of 1983 Arizona Central Zone scaled to ground from zero (0) northing and zero
(0) easting, as realized in the 1992 adjustment. The scale factor shall be derived from the center of the
project and the mean elevation. In addition, there shall be a (-550,000) foot translation in the northing
component. MCDOT GDACS points shall be used for control. The Consultant shall review and verify
the coordinate system is established per Section 4.5 of the MCDOT RDM.
300.3 Supplemental Field Survey
If additional survey data is needed, the Consultant shall submit a request through the MCDOT Project
Manager.
SECTION 400 PROJECT COORDINATION
400.1 Stakeholder Meetings
Stakeholder meetings shall be held with the following entities. A maximum of two (2) representatives
will attend. Meetings are anticipated to last one (1) hour, with 1 hour of preparation. The number of
anticipated meetings with each stakeholder is designated in parentheses:
• Adjacent Private Developers four (4),
• Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) two (2),
• City of Glendale two (2),
• City of Peoria two (2),
• Tohono O’Odham Nation and additional tribal owners six (6), and
• Maricopa County Flood Control District (MCFCD) one (1).
Coordination with active adjacent private developments will be necessary to ensure development design
for off-site improvements are compatible with the improvements proposed as part of the TT0372 project.
This may include driveway and median opening location coordination, utility services and potentially
right-in access from the existing southbound SR 101L on-ramp. Consultant anticipates that design of
these improvements will remain the responsibility of the development team for each site and Consultant
shall work with the development team to ‘incorporate’ improvements as necessary into the project.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 14 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
400.1.1 Agenda
The Consultant shall be responsible for preparing the meeting agenda, exhibits, handouts, attending and
facilitating the meetings, and submitting notes of the meeting to MCDOT. All meeting agendas shall be
sent to the PM a minimum of 24-hours prior to the meeting occurrence for distribution to the Project
Team.
400.1.2 Attendance
The Consultant shall be responsible for taking attendance of all meeting attendees. The attendance list
shall be distributed with the meeting notes.
400.1.3 Meeting Notes
All meeting notes shall be sent to the PM within five (5) business days of the actual meeting occurrence
for review. The Consultant shall be responsible for distributing the meeting notes after review and
approval by the PM. Meeting attendees shall have an additional five (5) business days to comment on the
submitted meeting notes, after which time the notes will be considered final.
400.2 Public Involvement Plan
The Consultant’s subconsultant, MakPro Services, will coordinate with MCDOT to develop a public
involvement strategy. The public involvement strategy will meet NEPA requirements. The Public
Participation strategy may include mailers, surveys, public meetings, face to face meetings, virtual
outreach via website and social media or other methods deemed appropriate for the project. MCDOT will
work with local stakeholders to develop a list of seasonal/community events.
400.3 Public Involvement Activities
MCDOT will schedule one public meeting during final design. In addition to MakPro Services support,
the Consultant will have two (2) representatives attend and answer questions at the public meeting. The
meeting is anticipated to last 4 hours total, including travel.
400.5 Public Meeting Summary and Comments
MCDOT will compile a summary of public meeting input. The Consultant shall provide MCDOT a
summary of input received from interactions at the public meeting.
400.6 60% Public Project Update Activity and Feedback
The Consultant shall provide MCDOT project information to aid in Public Outreach activities at the
60% design level.
400.7 95% Public Outreach Materials
The Consultant shall provide exhibits and information for the public meeting. MCDOT will provide
printing of material for the public meeting.
400.8 Project Specific Partnering Special Provisions
The Consultant shall identify and develop project specific partnering special provisions with the project
partners to address the improvements identified in Section 1100.1.
400.10 Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA)
MCDOT and cities of El Mirage, Glendale, and Peoria executed the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)
for the project in December 2008. The Consultant shall be aware of the issues surrounding the IGA.
Labor-hours have been estimated for Consultant to coordinate with MCDOT to minimize adverse impact
to all affected parties.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 15 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
SECTION 500 UTILITIES AND RAILROAD
500.1 Verification of Existing Utility Base Map
MCDOT will provide existing utility base map compiled as part of previous scoping effort. Consultant
shall coordinate with MCDOT to ensure consistency between final design and the Scoping Design Report.
The Consultant shall indicate existing utilities by name, size, and type in base map. If existing and/or
new pipelines are 18 inches or greater in diameter, the Consultant shall show the pipe edge limits in base
map.
500.2 Utility and Railroad Conflict Identification
The Consultant shall indicate potential areas of conflict between utility facilities and project
improvements. The Consultant shall work with the Utility Coordinator to communicate with utility
companies to mitigate conflicts. The Consultant shall adjust project plans as much as possible to avoid
utility conflicts without impacting the needs of the project or public safety. When a property is acquired
for a project, private utility issues are resolved as part of the Right-of-Way acquisition. The Consultant
shall coordinate these and any private utility issues with the Utility Coordinator, Right-of-Way
Coordinator, and Project Manager.
500.2.1 Utility Potholing
The Consultant shall prepare a list of specific locations where an accurate vertical and horizontal location
of the utility is needed near the onset of the project. The requested pothole locations are to be indicated
on an exhibit with station and offsets along with survey control. All pothole requests shall be submitted
prior to the 60 percent submittal. The Consultant shall request verification of the As-Built location of
any underground utility that appears to be in close proximity or conflict with any proposed project
improvements to determine actual locations and resolve potential conflicts. MCDOT shall be responsible
for obtaining pothole data, including permits and necessary clearances, that MCDOT approves as being
necessary and will provide this information to the Consultant for use in design. The Consultant will
utilize the Utility Conflict and Resolution List in Appendix 4-C of the PDM to tabulate the information.
500.2.2 Utility Adjustments and Relocations
Utilities relocation will be coordinated by MCDOT. The Consultant shall design relocation of City
utilities. Consultant has included hours based on assumptions stated in Section 1100.1.9 of this Scope of
Services for anticipated City owned utilities that will require relocation due to the improvements
associated with this project. Consultant shall coordinate with the Utilities Coordinator and utility
companies to identify all utility conflicts, which will require adjustment and/or relocation. The
Consultant shall work closely with the utility company and MCDOT to determine the relocation
requirements of the utility facility.
500.3 Utility Prior Rights
MCDOT will determine by examination, easements, permits and/or other evidence, the utility’s rights to
occupy the area of conflict and who will bear the burden of relocation costs. Utility Coordinator will
verify prior rights.
500.4 Utility Company Review
MCDOT will initiate direct contact with utility company engineers for design coordination and conflict
resolution. The Consultant shall furnish review copies of 60, 95, and 100 percent plans to the Utility
Coordinator and each utility company having facilities in the project area. The size (half-size or full-
size) and number of the plans shall be as requested by the utility. The Consultant shall provide electronic
files on CD disks to Utility Companies when requested. One (1) plan set shall be provided to the MCDOT
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 16 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Utility Coordinator with each submittal. Consultant shall provide Utility Coordinator with copies of all
correspondence from utility companies.
500.5 Pothole Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections
MCDOT will provide pothole data to Consultant. Consultant shall show pothole data on plans, profiles,
and cross-sections. The pipe wall thickness shall be shown in profile and section views. Cross sections
will also be included. All utility elevations shall be shown in the same datum as the roadway plans.
The Consultant shall show the top of valve box elevations and top of operating nut elevations for all
water valves on the plan view with a leader pointing to all water valves. The Consultant shall show rim
and invert elevations for all existing storm and sanitary sewer manholes on the plan view with a leader
pointing to the manhole.
Existing utility crossings shall be shown at the location and elevation as obtained from As-Builts,
interpolated from actual survey data, or as determined from pothole explorations. The Consultant shall
indicate on the plans the data source by the notation “As-Built” or “pothole”. All elevations shall be
converted to and shown using the roadway project datum.
500.10 Proposed Utility Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections
Consultant shall show proposed utility data on plans, profiles, and cross-sections. All utility elevations
shall be shown in the same datum as the roadway plans.
500.11 Utility Relocation Plans
Consultant shall develop relocation plans for City owned facilities that are impacted by the proposed
improvements as described in Section 1100.1.9. R/W and/or easement requirements for utility relocations
shall be developed by the Consultant in consultation with utility provider and Utilities Coordinator.
Consultant shall coordinate with MCDOT and MCRED to aid the process of identifying Bureau of
Reclamation (BOR) land rights requirements and locations for the existing SRP Irrigation facilities
present within the project limits. During scoping, MCDOT has presented an alternative to SRP Irrigation
for the pipeline to be replaced within its current alignment to avoid further R/W / Easement needs.
Consultant will continue to advocate for this proposed alignment and shall provide a maximum of five
(5) exhibits and the associated line work in dgn CADD format to assist in this coordination process.
MCDOT and MCRED shall cover costs for review and permitting fees incurred for the BOR process
and develop SRP approved legal descriptions to provide to SRP. MCRED will develop the legal
descriptions for the SRP BOR land right easements.
500.12 Private Irrigation Relocation Plans
Consultant shall develop private irrigation relocation plans for existing private irrigation facilities along
the south side of Northern Avenue that will be impacted by proposed improvements as shown in Section
1100.1.8.
500.13 Utility Special Provisions
The Consultant shall identify and develop needed utility special provisions with the project partners to
address the improvements described in this Scope of Services.
500.14 Utility Relocation Cost Estimates
Consultant shall prepare utility relocation cost estimates and schedule for anticipated utility relocations
as requested by MCDOT. Cost estimates will be developed for relocation of facilities with approved
and/or anticipated prior rights approval by MCDOT.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 17 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
500.15 Utility and Railroad Agreements
MCDOT will develop any necessary utility agreements for the project. Consultant shall provide
information to the Utility Coordinator as requested to support the development of the agreements.
500.16 Utility Clearance Letter
MCDOT will develop the utility clearance letter. Consultant shall provide information to the Utility
Coordinator as requested to support the development of the utility clearance letter.
500.17 Utility Coordination Meetings
MCDOT shall arrange and conduct utility coordination meetings to facilitate identification and resolution
of conflicts for all impacted utility owners. Ten (10) utility coordination meetings have been assumed for
the project to coordinate relocation design with SRP Power, SRP Irrigation, CenturyLink, Cox, and the
cities of Glendale and Peoria. In addition, Consultant shall also arrange and conduct separate individual
utility meetings with SRP (representatives from Irrigation and Land) to resolve the anticipated irrigation
line conflicts, determine an appropriate alignment and resolve any resultant impacts to the BOR
Fee/Easement. Consultant anticipates up to six (6) additional utility meetings directly held with SRP
Irrigation and Land and potentially BOR.
500.17.1 Agenda
The Consultant shall be responsible for preparing the meeting agenda, exhibits, handouts, attending and
facilitating the meetings, and submitting notes of the meeting to MCDOT. All meeting agendas shall be
sent to the PM a minimum of 24-hours prior to the meeting occurrence for distribution to the Project
Team. The Consultant will provide a roll-plot for Utility coordination Meetings if requested by Utilities
Coordinator.
500.17.2 Attendance
The Consultant shall be responsible for taking attendance of all meeting attendees. The attendance list
shall be distributed with the meeting notes.
500.17.3 Meeting Notes
All meeting notes shall be sent to the PM within five (5) business days of the actual meeting occurrence
for review. The Consultant shall be responsible for distributing the meeting notes after the Project
Manager’s review and approval. Meeting attendees shall have an additional five (5) business days to
comment on the submitted meeting notes, after which time the notes will be considered final.
500.18 General Utility Coordination
Consultant shall complete general coordination activities throughout the duration of the project’s design
with each of the utility companies to ensure that momentum is maintained on utility conflicts reviews,
providing of prior rights, relocation design and relocation construction. General coordination activities
will be logged and reported as they occur and communicated regularly with the PM.
SECTION 600 ENVIRONMENTAL
600.1 Environmental
The Consultant’s subconsultant, AZTEC, will prepare the necessary environmental documents (NEPA
update) for this project. See attached scope and fee proposal from AZTEC for a detailed breakdown.
Labor-hours have been estimated for Consultant to coordinate with MCDOT and ADOT on the approval
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 18 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
of the Environmental document and to coordinate with AZTEC and to provide support information for
the environmental clearance document.
SECTION 800 TECHNICAL MEMORANDA AND REPORTS
800.1 Traffic Analysis Report
Subconsultant, Burgess & Niple (B&N), shall be responsible for preparing the Preliminary and Sealed
Traffic Report in accordance with the PDM. Consultant will coordinate with B&N to provide information
and support as needed. Included as part of the Traffic Report will be a final confirmation of the anticipated
operational performance of each of the signalized intersections along the corridor (including signal
progression analysis) and the DDI. In addition, the traffic analysis effort also includes an allowance
number of hours for ensuring that adjacent development design updates from the Scoping phase are
accounted for in the project’s traffic modeling to ensure no adverse impact to proposed operations. See
attached scope and fee proposal from B&N for a detailed breakdown of this task.
800.2 Drainage Report
Subconsultant, J2 Engineering & Environmental Design (J2), shall be responsible for preparing the
Preliminary and Sealed Drainage Report. Drainage design shall be performed in accordance with the
current MCDOT Roadway Design Manual, the Flood Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC)
Drainage Design Manual (Volumes I, II and III) and the Project Development Manual. Consultant will
coordinate with J2 to provide information and support as needed. See attached scope and fee proposal
from J2 for a detailed breakdown of this task.
800.3 Structures Report
The preparation of a Structures Report is not included in the scope of services.
800.4 Geotechnical and Pavement Design Report
Subconsultant, Ethos Engineers (Ethos), shall be responsible for preparing the Preliminary and Sealed
Geotechnical Report in accordance with the PDM. The geotechnical report will provide suggested
alternatives and mitigation measures for at-grade pavements, new embankments, walls, basins, channels,
box culverts, storm drain pipes and utilities. Labor-hours have been estimated for Consultant to
coordinate the development of the Materials Design Report (MDR) for the portion of construction
occurring within ADOT right-of-way and maintenance limits and also to coordinate with Ethos to provide
information and support as needed. See attached scope and fee proposal from Ethos for a detailed
breakdown of this task.
800.6 Utilities Report
The preparation of a Utility Report is not included in the scope of services.
800.8 Wall Selection Report
The preparation of a Wall Selection Report is not included in the scope of services.
800.9 Lighting Design Report
Subconsultant, Y2K Engineering (Y2K), shall be responsible for preparing the Preliminary and Sealed
Lighting Design Report in accordance with the City of Peoria and ADOT. Consultant will coordinate
with Y2K to provide information and support as needed. See attached scope and fee proposal from Y2K
for a detailed breakdown of this task.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 19 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
SECTION 900 RIGHT OF WAY
900.1 Right-of-Way
MCRED will provide existing right-of-way base mapping. Consultant will provide the proposed right-
of-way line work to MCRED for land right acquisition. MCRED will prepare information as needed to
perform the land right acquisitions necessary from the adjacent landowners to facilitate the proposed
improvements.
If so requested by the MCDOT PM, Subconsultant, Wood Patel, shall be responsible for providing legal
descriptions for the USA Fee/Easement associated with potential SRP Irrigation relocations and as
necessary to support tribal acquisitions. Labor-hours have been estimated for Consultant to coordinate
with Wood Patel and MCRED to provide information and support as needed. R/W support efforts included
in the attached Wood Patel proposal are: tribal acquisition coordination activities, obtaining of Title
Reports (28 total) for impacted parcels along the corridor, preparation of legal descriptions and
participation in project meetings. See attached scope and fee proposal from Wood Patel for a detailed
breakdown of this task.
Labor-hours have been included for Consultant to create detailed Right-of-way strip maps for the project
corridor including all land rights and easement information as contained within obtained Title Reports.
SECTION 1100 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE
1100.1 60 % Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development
Consultant will prepare design plans for the limits of the project within Northern Avenue beginning
approximately 600 feet west of 99th Avenue and extending to the 87th Avenue intersection. Proposed
improvements will also extend along 99th Avenue (Northern Avenue to approximately 1,800 feet south),
91st Avenue (Northern Avenue to approximately 400 feet south) 89th Avenue (Hayward Avenue to
Northern Avenue) and Hayward Avenue (89th Avenue to 91st Avenue).
Subconsultant, Burgess & Niple (B&N), will develop the plans along Northern Avenue from 100 feet east
of the 98th Avenue centerline to 950 feet west of the 93rd Avenue centerline, this includes the SR 101L
and Northern intersection and associated entrance/exit ramps.
1100.1.1 Typical Section Design & Plan Development
Consultant shall develop Typical Section plan sheets in accordance with the PDM for the limits listed in
Section 1100.1.
1100.1.2 Roadway Design & Plan Development
Consultant shall develop Roadway Plan and Profile Sheets at 1”=20’ scale in accordance with the RDM
for the limits listed in Section 1100.1. A list of the type and number of anticipated Roadway Plan and
Profile Sheets are shown in the derivation of labor hours with the corresponding estimated labor hours for
each type of plan sheet.
Cross sections will be prepared as part each submittal. Consultant will prepare the cross sections for the
full project limits. A Draft Earthwork Report will be prepared at the 60% submittal and a Final Earthwork
Report will be prepared at the 95% submittal.
1100.1.3 Driveway Detail Design & Plan Development
Consultant shall develop Driveway Detail Sheets at 1”=20’ scale in accordance with the RDM for the
limits listed in Section 1100.1. Driveway details (plan and profile view) will be prepared for every
driveway intersecting Northern Parkway within the project limits.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 20 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
1100.1.4 Intersection Detail Sheets Design & Plan Development
Consultant shall develop Intersection Detail Sheets at 1”=20’ scale in accordance with the RDM for the
limits listed in Section 1100.1. An intersection detail sheet (staking plan) will be prepared for every major
intersection along the project alignment within the project limits.
1100.1.5 Detail Sheets Design & Plan Development
Consultant shall develop Detail Sheets at 1”=20’ scale in accordance with the RDM for the limits listed
in Section 1100.1. A list of the type and number of anticipated Detail Sheets are shown in the derivation
of labor hours with the corresponding estimated labor hours.
1100.1.6 Drainage Design & Plan Development
Subconsultant, J2 Engineering & Environmental Design (J2), shall be responsible for preparing the
Drainage Design and Plan Sheets for the full project limits. See their attached Scope of Services for a
detailed breakdown. Labor-hours have been estimated for Consultant coordination with J2 to provide
support information as needed
1100.1.7 Structures Design & Plan Development
Consultant shall develop Wall Plan sheets for the approximately 700-foot-long wall along Ramp A. This
includes development of plans, geometry evaluation and quantity for the final retaining wall design. Per
the available plans (TT0573), the wall is located closed to the existing freeway. Consultant shall
determine if an ADOT standard retaining wall detail can be utilized at this location or if a custom retaining
wall design is warranted based on constructability concerns.
Consultant shall develop the design for the reinforcing of the soil nail walls at the front face of the bridge
abutments and provide reinforcing detail plan sheets and quantities. Consultant will coordinate closely
with Ethos Engineering to complete the reinforcing design for the soil nail wall.
Consultant shall perform the structural analysis and design for the box culvert extension immediately
east of the 101 interchange. This includes development of plans, calculations, geometry evaluation and
quantities for the final box culvert. The existing wing walls will be replaced and reconstructed. Canal
lining will be reconstructed to accommodate the extension of the box culvert.
Consultant’s estimate includes the necessary hours for preparing design calculations for the structure
items in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications for Highway Bridges, 8th
Edition 2017.
It is assumed that the retaining wall along Ramp A will be a custom retaining wall to accommodate the
ramp remaining open during construction and the walls in front of the bridge abutments are soil nail walls.
The extension of box culvert will be designed in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications for Highway Bridges, 8th Edition 2017.
1100.1.8 Private Irrigation Design & Plan Development
The Consultant shall develop Private Irrigation Design and Profile Sheets at 1”=20’ scale in accordance
with the RDM for the full project limits. A list of the type and number of anticipated Private Irrigation
Sheets are shown in the derivation of labor hours.
Design of SRP Irrigation facilities will be performed by SRP.
1100.1.9 City Owned Utility Relocation Design & Plan Development
Consultant shall develop Utility Relocation Sheets at 1”=20’ scale in accordance with the RDM for the
full project limits. Consultant assumes the following City owned utility infrastructure will be impacted
by the proposed improvements and require relocation design:
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 21 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
• SROG Water Meter Station at SWC 99th Ave/Northern Ave
• City of Peoria Water (500 LF relocation assumed and 3 drop sections)
• City of Glendale Water (500 LF relocation assumed and 3 drop sections)
1100.1.10 Landscape Architectural and Erosion Control Design and Plan Development
Subconsultant, J2, will prepare the Landscape Architecture, Erosion Control and Wall Aesthetics design
and plans in accordance with the MCDOT PDM for the full project limits. See attached scope and fee
proposal from J2 for detailed scope and fee. Labor-hours have been estimated for Consultant
coordination with J2 to provide support information as needed.
1100.1.11 Maintenance of Traffic Design and Plan Development
Subconsultant, Burgess & Niple (B&N), will prepare the Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) design and plans
in accordance with the MCDOT RDM for the full project limits. B&N will work with the project
stakeholders to develop an MOT concept that minimizes the impacts to the traveling public and adjacent
businesses. As part of the MOT plans, B&N have also included effort for the development of temporary
signal system designs at each of the major project intersections. These designs will be prepared in
accordance with City of Peoria standards (span wires at a minimum; no roll-away signal equipment)
inclusive of street name signs being included.
See attached scope and fee proposal from B&N for detailed scope and fee. Labor-hours have been
estimated for Consultant coordination with B&N to provide support information as needed.
1100.1.12 Traffic Signal Design and Plan Development
Subconsultants, Y2K (99th Avenue and 98th Avenue), Aztec (93rd Avenue and 91st Avenue) and B&N (2
ADOT signals at the 101 interchange) will prepare the Traffic Signal Design and Plans. See attached
scope and fee proposals from Subconsultants for detailed scope and fee. Labor-hours have been estimated
for Consultant coordination with subconsultants to provide support information as needed.
1100.1.13 Intelligent Transportation System (Adaptive) Design and Plan Development
Subconsultant, Y2K will perform Intelligent Transportation Systems Design and Plan Development for
the full project limits. See attached scope and fee proposal from Y2K for detailed scope and fee. Labor-
hours have been estimated for Consultant coordination with Y2K to provide support information as
needed.
1100.1.14 Roadway and Underdeck Lighting Design and Plan Development
Subconsultant, Y2K will perform Roadway and Underdeck Lighting Design and Plan Development for
the full project limits. See attached scope and fee proposal from Y2K for detailed scope and fee. Labor-
hours have been estimated for Consultant coordination with Y2K to provide support information as
needed.
1100.1.15 Signing and Pavement Marking Design and Plan Development
Consultant shall develop Signing and Marking Sheets at 1”=20’ scale in accordance with the RDM for
the limits listed in Section 1100.1. A list of the type and number of anticipated Signing and Marking
Sheets, including Notes Sheets, Quantities Summary Sheets, Sign Summaries, and Sign Format Sheets
are shown in the derivation of labor hours with the corresponding estimated labor hours for each type of
plan sheet.
1100.1.16 Special Provisions
Consultant shall prepare the special provisions not adequately covered by the MAG Uniform Standard
Specifications and MCDOT Supplement for the work listed in Section 1100.1 The special provisions
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 22 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
will follow the Northern Parkway Program Special Provisions that incorporate the requirements of the
multiple agencies affected by the project. Labor hours have been estimated for preparing and combining
these special provisions at each of the submittal stages.
The Consultant shall prepare a construction contract time schedule for the project as part of each
submittal stage.
1100.1.17 Construction Cost Estimates
Consultant shall compute quantities for the work as listed in Section 1100.
Consultant will combine the computed quantities provided by Subconsultants and import the estimates
into the MCDOT Cost Estimating Tool for all stages of the design (60%, 95%, 100% and Sealed and
Signed).
1100.2 60 % PS&E Submittal
Consultant will perform one quality control review by a senior level staff prior to the 60% submittal.
Consultant will create and deliver submittal documents.
Consultant will compile review comments and provide initial responses prior to the Comment Resolution
Meeting.
1100.3 95 % Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development
Consultant will incorporate review comments into the PS&E identified in Section 1100.1.
1100.4 95 % PS&E Submittal
Consultant will perform one quality control review by a senior level staff prior to the 95% submittal.
Consultant will create and deliver submittal documents.
Consultant will compile review comments and provide initial responses prior to the Comment Resolution
Meeting.
1100.5 100 % Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development
Consultant will incorporate review comments into the PS&E identified in Section 1100.1.
1100.6 100 % PS&E Submittal
Consultant will perform one quality control review by a senior level staff prior to the 100% submittal.
Consultant will create and deliver submittal documents.
Consultant will compile review comments and provide initial responses prior to the Comment Resolution
Meeting.
1100.7 Sealed Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development
Consultant will incorporate review comments into the PS&E identified in Section 1100.1.
1100.8 Constructability Review
Consultant will perform a Constructability Review prior to all project submittals (60%, 95%, 100% and
Sealed). The review will be performed by Consultant’s construction expert.
1100.9 Construction Phasing
Subconsultant, Burgess & Niple (B&N), will prepare Construction Phasing plans for the proposed
roadway improvements in accordance with the MCDOT PDM for the full project limits. Consultant and
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 23 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Subconsultant (B&N) will work with the project stakeholders to develop phasing plan concept that
minimizes the impacts to the traveling public and adjacent businesses. See attached scope and fee proposal
from B&N for detailed scope and fee. Labor-hours have been estimated for Consultant coordination with
B&N to provide support information as needed.
1100.10 Sealed PS&E Submittal
Consultant will provide sealed plans, specifications and estimates listed in Section 1100.1.
1100.11 Project Submittals
Table 4 depicts the submittals to be provided by the Consultant for each deliverable during each stage of
the project. The Consultant shall transmit files electronically to the PM at each submittal stage along
with one hard copy.
Table 4 – Project Submittals Table
Legend: Mirage
H# - Number of Hard Copies Requested Copies
Representative) El
E - Indicates Electronic Submittal is P.E.
Requested Manager) Hard
Scott Glendale,
Markert, Peoria (Stakeholder) of
Brent of &
(Project Company Number
Ben Cities
Total
Submittal Document (Utility ADOT,
Drainage Report E, H3 E 3
Geotechnical & Pavement Design Report E, H3 E 3
Traffic Report E, H3 E 3
Lighting Design Report E, H3 E 3
60% PS&E
Plans E, H1 E, H1 E 2
Specifications E, H1 E 1
Estimate E, H1 E 1
MicroStation and Open Roads CADD files
95% PS&E
Plans E, H1 E, H1 E 2
Specifications E, H1 E 1
Estimate E, H1 E 1
MicroStation and Open Roads CADD files
100% PS&E
MicroStation and Open Roads CADD files
Plans E, H1 E, H1 E 2
Specifications E, H1 E 1
Estimate E, H1 E 1
Microstation and Open Roads CADD files
Sealed PS&E
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 24 of 25

Scope of Services
Project Specific
Plans E, H1 E, H1 E 2
Specifications E, H1 E 1
Estimate E, H1 E 1
MicroStation and Open Roads CADD files
SECTION 1300 BIDDING PHASE
1300.6 Preparation of Addenda
Consultant will respond to questions during the bidding phase and will prepare up to five (5) addenda.
Consultant will provide a bid analysis of the construction bids received prior to award to the apparent
low bidder.
SECTION 1400 CONSTRUCTION PHASE
1400.1 Pre-Construction Conference
Consultant will attend the Pre-Construction Conference to help bring the contractor on board as the
project enters the construction phase. The Consultant will have two (2) representatives in attendance.
The meeting is anticipated to last 2 hours.
1400.2 Requests for Information (RFIs)
Consultant will assist MCDOT with post design services. Requests for Information (RFIs), Shop
Drawing and Submittal Reviews from the contractor. No hours are anticipated for record drawings at this
time, this effort is considered included in the Construction Manager’s scope of work.
Consultant has allocated hours for Section 1300 and Section 1400 Tasks to equate to a total estimated
amount of approximately 5% of the final design phase design fee. Exact hours for Consultant and
Subconsultants will be determined as the Construction Phase of the project draws nearer, however the
total cost for Section 1300 and Section 1400 Tasks is not anticipated to exceed the amount included as
part of this proposal.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Revised: February 2021 Page 25 of 25

EXHIBIT B
CONSULTANT’S FEE PROPOSAL
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH
AVENUE, FINAL DESIGN

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm T.Y. Lin International
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR
PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
Principal-in-Charge - $ 117.40 $ -
Project Manager 935 $ 93.54 $ 87,460
Construction Engineer 80 $ 84.91 $ 6,793
Senior Project Engineer 2,107 $ 60.00 $ 126,420
Project Engineer 1,353 $ 45.43 $ 61,467
Design Engineer 1,640 $ 42.39 $ 69,520
Technician 4,255 $ 32.92 $ 140,075
Clerical 120 $ 16.14 $ 1,937
10,490 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost $ 493,672
Overhead 157.763% $ 778,832
Subtotal $ 1,272,504
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Travel $ 941
Plotting $ 880
Miscellaneous Expenses $ 225
Total Estimated Expenses $ 2,046
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
Burgess and Niple $ 804,860.00
Aztec Engineering $ 126,830.28
Y2K Engineering $ 230,962.00
J2 Engineering and Design $ 376,446.00
Ethos Engineering $ 93,012.00
MakPro Services $ 7,701.00
Wood Patel $ 160,139.00
Total Estimated Outside Services $ 1,799,950.28
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 127,250.38
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $ 3,201,750
CONTRACT TIME 1,888 Calendar Days
2/4/2021
Consultant Firm Signature Date
3/26/2013 Page 1 of 1

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm T.Y. Lin International
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS - FINAL DESIGN
Senior
No Hours/ Principal-in- Project Construction Project Design
TASK Scale Project Technician Clerical Total
Shts Sheet Charge Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer
Engineer
TASK 100 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
100.1 - Project Work Plan 4 4.0
100.2 - Project Initiation 1 1 2.0
100.3 - Kick-Off Meeting 4 2 2 8.0
100.4 - Design Criteria 2 2 6 10.0
100.6 - Project Progress Meetings 80 120 120 320.0
100.8 - Field Walk with Project Team 4 4 4 12.0
100.9 - Project Implementation and Master Schedule 16 8 24.0
100.12 - Project Administration 60 100 120 280.0
TASK 200 - DATA ACQUISITION
200.1 - Project Research / Data Collection 2 8 8 24 12 54.0
200.2 - Review Acquired Data 8 12 20.0
200.3 - Identify Additional Information Needs 4 12 16.0
200.4 - Site Visit and Project Research 8 12 20.0
TASK 300 - LAND SURVEY
300.1 - Results of Survey, Section Control, Exst R/W Base Map 4 8 12.0
300.2 - Establish Coordinate System per RDM 4 8 12.0
300.3 - Supplemental Field Survey 2 4 16 22.0
TASK 400 - PROJECT COORDINATION
400.1 - Stakeholder Meetings 80 120 200.0
400.2 - Public Involvement Plan 4 8 4 16.0
400.3 - Public Involvement Activities 4 4 4 12.0
400.5 - Public Meeting Summary and Comments 2 2 4.0
400.6 - 60% Public Project Update Activity and Feedback 1 4 5.0
400.7 - 95% Public Outreach Materials 1 4 5.0
400.8 - Project Specific Partnering Special Provisions 2 12 8 22.0
400.10 - Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA) 8 20 8 36.0
TASK 500 - UTILITIES AND RAILROAD
500.1 - Verification of Existing Utility Base Map 2 12 20 40 74.0
500.2 - Utility and Railroad Conflict Identification 4 24 32 60.0
500.3 - Utility Prior Rights 2 6 4 12.0
500.4 - Utility Company Review of Recommended Alternative 4 4 12 20.0
500.5 - Pothole Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections 2 8 40 50.0
500.10 - Proposed Utility Data on Plans, Profile and Cross-Sections 2 8 40 50.0
500.11 - Utility Relocation Plans (Coordination with MCDOT) 4 8 16 28.0
500.12 - Private Irrigation Relocation Plans (Coordination with MCDOT) 2 12 16 30.0
500.13 - Utility Special Provisions 4 12 16.0
500.14 - Utility Relocation Cost Estimates 4 8 16 28.0
500.15 - Utility and Railroad Agreements 2 8 10.0
500.16 - Utility Clearance Letter 2 8 10.0
500.17 - Utility Coordination Meetings 45 45 90.0
500.18 - General Utility Coordination 40 80 40 160.0
TASK 600 - Environmental
600.1 - Environmental 12 24 36.0
TASK 800 - Technical Memoranda and Reports
800.1 - Traffic Analysis Report 12 32 12 56.0
800.2 - Drainage Report 12 32 12 56.0
800.4 - Geotechnical and Pavement Design Report 4 8 12.0
800.9 - Lighting Design Report 2 4 6.0
TASK 900 - Right of Way
900.1 - Right of Way 8 16 60 140 224.0
3/26/2013 Page 1 of 3

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm T.Y. Lin International
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS - FINAL DESIGN
Senior
No Hours/ Principal-in- Project Construction Project Design
TASK Scale Project Technician Clerical Total
Shts Sheet Charge Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer
Engineer
TASK 1100 - Plans, Specifications and Estimate
1100.1 - 60% Plans Specifications and Estimate Development
1100.1.1 - Typical Section Design and Plan Development 5 23 4 8 24 80 116.0
1100.1.2 - Roadway Design and Plan Development
Face Sheet 1 4 1 3 4.0
ADOT Standard Drawing Sheets 2 2 1 3 4.0
General Notes 1 8 2 6 8.0
Index 1 10 2 2 6 10.0
Design Data Sheet with Earthwork Quantities and Pavement Structural Sections 2 10 4 8 8 20.0
Quantity Summary Sheets 2 12 2 2 20 24.0
Horizontal and Vertical Control 500 2 10 2 2 16 20.0
Survey Monumentation 100 3 12 2 2 32 36.0
Roadway Geometry Plans 100 3 12 2 10 24 36.0
Paving Plans 20 19 12 4 24 48 160 236.0
Paving Profile Plans 20 19 12 4 24 48 160 236.0
Cross Sections at 50' intervals (3 sections per sheet) 20 100 2 4 60 80 100 244.0
QA/QC 8 8 16 24 56.0
1100.1.3 - Driveway Detail Design and Plan Development 20 11 12 4 24 40 60 128.0
1100.1.4 - Intersection Detail Sheets Design and Plan Development 20 8 12 2 16 20 60 98.0
1100.1.5 - Detail Sheets Design and Plan Development
Median Staking Detail 20 10 12 2 24 36 60 122.0
ADA Sidewalk Ramp Details (4 ramps per sheet) 20 8 12 2 18 24 48 92.0
Miscellaneous Details (Shoulder Grading Detail, Barrier Details, etc.) 20 2 12 2 4 18 24.0
1100.1.6 - Drainage Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review 8 4 12.0
1100.1.7 - Structures Design and Plan Development
Ramp A Wall
Wall Sheet - General Notes 1 44 2 2 8 8 24 44.0
Wall Detail 1 ( Typical Section and Call out) 1 48 2 2 4 8 32 48.0
Wall Detail 2 ( Table for Reinforcing and Joint Detail) 1 44 2 2 4 12 24 44.0
Wall Corner Detail ( Tie in for the wall at the abutment FF) 1 44 2 2 4 4 32 44.0
Wall Fence Post Detail (Safety Rail Detail) 1 40 2 2 4 8 24 40.0
Soil Nail Wall
Wall Sheet- General Notes 1 44 2 2 8 8 24 44.0
Wall Detail 1 ( Reinforcing for Surface Area) 1 48 2 2 4 8 32 48.0
Wall Detail 2 (Misc Detail and Joint Detail) 1 48 2 2 4 8 32 48.0
Box Culvert Extension
Plan and Elevation North 1 48 2 2 4 8 32 48.0
Plan and Elevation South 1 48 2 2 4 8 32 48.0
Cross Section Detail 1 48 2 2 4 8 32 48.0
Wingwall Detail 1 48 2 2 4 8 32 48.0
Reinforcing Detail 1 48 2 2 4 8 32 48.0
Structural Calculations and Analysis
Engineering Calcs and Specs (Custom Wall along the Ramp) 4 8 24 40 76.0
Analysis, Calcs and Coordinaiton with Geotech (Soil Nail Wall) 4 8 16 40 68.0
Engineering, Analysis, Calcs and Specs (Box Culvert and Drainage Str) 4 8 32 56 100.0
Quantities/Cost Estimates (Walls only) 2 8 16 16 42.0
Quantities/Cost Estimates (Box Culvert) 4 8 24 24 60.0
1100.1.8 - Private Irrigation Design and Plan Development - Plan/Profile (2,100 LF Open Channel) 20 5 28 2 12 24 40 60 138.0
1100.1.9 - City Owned Utility Relocation Design and Plan Development
SROG water meter at southwest corner 99th/Northern Avenues - Demo Plan 20 1 12 2 2 8 12.0
SROG water meter at southwest corner 99th/Northern Avenues - Proposed Plan 20 1 12 1 1 2 8 12.0
SROG water meter at southwest corner 99th/Northern Avenues - Details 20 2 12 1 2 8 12 23.0
3/26/2013 Page 2 of 3

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm T.Y. Lin International
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS - FINAL DESIGN
Senior
No Hours/ Principal-in- Project Construction Project Design
TASK Scale Project Technician Clerical Total
Shts Sheet Charge Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer
Engineer
SROG water meter at southwest corner 99th/Northern Avenues - Electrical Plan 20 4 12 4 12 32 48.0
SROG water meter at southwest corner 99th/Northern Avenues - Electrical Details 20 3 12 4 8 24 36.0
SROG water meter at southwest corner 99th/Northern Avenues - Conduit Schedule 20 2 12 1 2 8 12 23.0
Relocation design for City of Peoria Water Facilities - 500 LF and 3 drop sections 20 4 12 1 3 12 32 48.0
Relocation design for City of Glendale Water Facilities - 500 LF and 3 drop sections 20 4 12 1 3 12 32 48.0
Miscellaneous Detail Sheets 2 12 1 2 8 12 23.0
1100.1.10 - Landscape Architectural and SWPPP Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review 4 16 8 28.0
1100.1.11 - Maintenance of Traffic Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review 4 16 8 28.0
1100.1.12 - Traffic Signal Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review 4 16 8 28.0
1100.1.13 - ITS (Adaptive) Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review 4 16 8 28.0
1100.1.14 - Roadway and Underdeck Lighting Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review 4 16 8 28.0
1100.1.15 - Signing and Pavement Marking Design and Plan Development
Signing and Marking Notes 1 14 1 3 10 14.0
Signing and Marking Quantity Summary 1 14 1 3 10 14.0
Sign Summary Sheets 3 12 2 4 8 22 36.0
Sign Format Sheets 3 14 2 4 8 28 42.0
Signing and Marking Plans 20 19 10 4 18 44 120 186.0
1100.1.16 - Special Provisions 16 24 32 72.0
1100.1.17 - Construction Cost Estimates 2 4 36 48 12 102.0
1100.2 - 60% PS&E Submittal 2 8 10.0
1100.3 - 95% Plans Specifications and Estimate Development 74 275 229 192 820 1590.0
1100.4 - 95% PS&E Submittal 2 8 10.0
1100.5 - 100% Plans Specifications and Estimate Development 55 208 187 148 664 1262.0
1100.6 - 100% PS&E Submittal 2 8 10.0
1100.7 - Sealed Plans Specifications and Estimate Development 36 142 112 104 465 859.0
1100.8 - Constructability Review 8 80 88.0
1100.10 - Sealed PS&E Submittal 2 8 10.0
1100.11 - Project Submittals 2 8 10.0
TASK 1300 - Bidding Phase
1300.6 - Preparation of Addenda 40 60 80 180.0
TASK 1400 - Construction Phase
1400.1 - Pre-Construction Conference 4 4 8.0
1400.2 - RFIs 100 220 220 280 820.0
#
267 935 80 2107 1353 1640 4255 120 10490.0
3/26/2013 Page 3 of 3

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm T.Y. Lin International
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES
Travel
A. Local Mileage at
$ 0.56 60 trips @ 28 miles round trip 1,680 miles
Subtotal Travel $ 941
Plotting
B. 11x17 Exhibits / Plans at $ 0.08 1,920
Assume 320 pages for plans x 6 $ 153.60
C. 8.5x11 Reports / Specs at $ 0.04 1,400
Assume 350 pages for reports/specs x 4 $ 56
D. Plan Submittals @ 320 sheets 6
Half Size Bond Copies at Copies
Full Size Bond Copies at $ 2.75 320 Copies
Subtotal Plotting $ 880.00
Miscellaneous Expenses
C. Courier (15 budgeted at $15/delivery) $ 225
Subtotal Miscellaneous Expenses $ 225
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES & CONSULTANTS
Burgess and Niple $ 804,860.00
Aztec Engineering $ 126,830.28
Y2K Engineering $ 230,962.00
J2 Engineering and Design $ 376,446.00
Ethos Engineering $ 93,012.00
MakPro Services $ 7,701.00
Wood Patel $ 160,139.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES $ 1,799,950.28
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES $ 1,801,996
3/26/2013 Page 1 of 1

NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE
PROJECT NO. TT0372
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
Work Breakdown Structure
60% 95% 100% Sealed
Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks
100
Project Management
100.1.- Project Work Plan F
100.2.- Project Initiation F
100.3.- Kick-Off Meeting F
100.4.- Design Criteria
100.5.- Design Exceptions
100.6.- Project Progress Meetings X X X
100.7.- Determine VE Study Recommendation
100.8.- Field Walk with Project Team X X
100.9.- Project Implementation and Master Schedule
100.10.- Project Delivery Method Recommendation
100.11.- Team input for Seasonal limitations (dry-ups, monsoon, special event, etc.).
100.12.- Project Administration X X X X
100.13.- Quality Assurance/Control X X X X
200
Data Acquisition
200.1.- Project Research / Data Collection X
200.2.- Review Acquired Data X
200.3.- Identify Additional Information Needs X
200.4.- Site Visit and Project Research X
300
Land Survey
300.1.- Results of Survey, Section Control, Exst R/W Base Map
300.2.- Establish Coordinate System per RDM
300.3.- Supplemental Field Survey X X X X
400
Project Coordination
400.1.- Stakeholder Meetings X
400.2.- Public Involvement Plan F
400.3.- Public Involvement Activities X
400.4.- Public Involvement Summary X
400.5.- Public Meeting Summary and Comments F
Page 1 of 6
WBS 1/13/2021

NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE
PROJECT NO. TT0372
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
Work Breakdown Structure
60% 95% 100% Sealed
Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks
400.6.- 60% Public Project Update Activity and Feedback F
400.7.- 95% Public Outreach Materials F
400.8.- Project Specific Partnering Special Provisions P F S
400.9.- Intergovernmental and Maintenance Agreements Identification
400.10.- Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA) P F
500
Utilities and Railroad
500.1.- Verification of Existing Utility Base Map
500.2.- Utility and Railroad Conflict Identification
500.3.- Utility Prior Rights
500.4.- Utility Company Review of Recommended Alternative
500.5.- Pothole Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections F
500.6.- Proposed Utility Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections
500.7.- Utility Relocation Concepts with R/W and Easement Requirements
500.8.- Private Irrigation Relocation Concepts
500.9.- Utility Relocation Cost Estimates and Schedule
500.10.- Proposed Utility Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections P F FR FR
500.11.- Utility Relocation Plans P F FR S
500.12.- Private Irrigation Relocation Plans P F FR S
500.13.- Utility Special Provisions P F FR S
500.14.- Utility Relocation Cost Estimates P F FR S
500.15.- Utility and Railroad Agreements I P F
500.16.- Utility Clearance Letter F
500.17.- Utility Coordination Meetings P F FR FR
500.18.- General Utility Coordination P F FR FR
600
Environmental
600.1.- Environmental Document Tech Memo
600.2.- Environmental Inventory and Fatal Flaw Documentation
600.3.- Determine Environmental Impacts
600.4.- Identify Environmental Items for Evaluation Matrix
Page 2 of 6
WBS 1/13/2021

NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE
PROJECT NO. TT0372
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
Work Breakdown Structure
60% 95% 100% Sealed
Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks
600.5.- Complete Title VI, Limited English Proficiency and Environmental Justice Assessment
600.6.- Document Anticipated Environmental Permits with Associated Schedule Requirements
600.7.- Geotechnical Environmental Clearance X
600.8.- Utility Pothole Environmental Clearance X
600.9.- Environmental Document (ED) P F
600.10.- Environmental Document (CE) F
600.11.- Environmental Permits Approved F
600.12.- Environmental Clearance Letter (with Mitigation Measures) F
800
Technical Memoranda and Reports
800.1.- Traffic Analysis F FR S
800.2.- Drainage Report F FR S
800.3.- Structures
800.4.- Geotechnical and Pavement Design Report F FR S
800.5.- Alternatives Analysis
800.6.- Utilities Report
800.7.- Right-of-way Report
900
Right-of-Way
900.1.- Identify Open & Declare Right-of-Way (R/W) Status
900.2.- R/W Base Map
900.3.- Right-of-way Limit Requirements
900.4.- Land Value Estimate
900.5.- Acquisition Timeline Estimate
900.6.- Identify Unique Ownerships with project budget and schedule requirements
900.7.- Title Reports
900.8.- Right-of-Entry (Environmental, Geotechnical, Potholing)
900.9.- Identify & Map Prior Right Conflicts
900.10.- Initiate and Complete Open & Declare Right-of-Way (R/W) F F
900.11.- Contact Letters to Property Owners F
900.12. - Title Reports F
900.13.- Right-of-Entry (Environmental, Geotechnical, Potholing) F
900.14.- Research & Evaluate Prior Rights Claims F
Page 3 of 6
WBS 1/13/2021

NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE
PROJECT NO. TT0372
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
Work Breakdown Structure
60% 95% 100% Sealed
Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks
900.15.- Right-of-Way Strip Map (Note: No R/W or Easement changes after 60%) P F
900.16.- Right-of-Way Clearance Letter F
1100
Plans, Specifications and Estimate
1100.1.- 60% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Development X
1100.1.1 - Typical Sections X
1100.1.2 - Roadway Design and Plan Development X
1100.1.2.1 - Face Sheet X
1100.1.2.2 - ADOT Standard Drawing Sheets X
1100.1.2.3 - General Notes X
1100.1.2.4 - Index X
1100.1.2.5 - Design Data Sheet w/Earthwork Quantities and PSS X
1100.1.2.6 - Quantity Summary Sheets X
1100.1.2.7 - Horizontal and Vertical Control X
1100.1.2.8 - Survey Monumentation X
1100.1.2.9 - Roadway Geometry Plans X
1100.1.2.10 - Paving Plans X
1100.1.2.11 - Paving Profile Plans X
1100.1.2.12 - Cross Sections X
1100.1.3 - Driveway Detail Design and Plan Development X
1100.1.4 - Intersection Detail Sheets Design and Plan Development X
1100.1.5 - Detail Sheets Design and Plan Development X
1100.1.5.1 - Median Staking Details X
1100.1.5.2 - ADA Sidewalk Ramp Details X
1100.1.5.3 - Shoulder Grading Details X
1100.1.6 - Drainage Design and Plan Development X
1100.1.7 - Structures Design and Plan Development X
Ramp A Wall
1100.1.7.1 - Wall Sheet General Notes X
1100.1.7.2 - Wall Detail 1 (Typical Section and Call out) X
1100.1.7.3 - Wall Detail 2 (Table for Reinforcing and Joint Detail) X
1100.1.7.4 - Wall Corner Detail (Tie in for the wall at abutment FF) X
1100.1.7.5 - Wall Fence Post Detail (Safety Rail Detail) X
Soil Nail Wall
1100.1.7.6 - Wall Sheet General Notes X
1100.1.7.7 - Wall Detail 1 (Reinforcing for Surface Area) X
1100.1.7.8 - Wall Detail 2 (Misc Detail and Joint Detail) X
Box Culvert Extension
1100.1.7.9 - Plan and Elevation North X
Page 4 of 6
WBS 1/13/2021

NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE
PROJECT NO. TT0372
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
Work Breakdown Structure
60% 95% 100% Sealed
Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks
1100.1.7.10 - Plan and Elevation South X
1100.1.7.11 - Cross Section Detail X
1100.1.7.12 - Wingwall Detail X
1100.1.7.13 - Reinforcing Detail X
1100.1.8 - Private Irrigation Design and Plan Development - Plan/Profile X
1100.1.9 - City Owned Utility Relocation Design and Plan Development X
1100.1.9.1 - SROG Meter Demo Plan X
1100.1.9.2 - SROG Meter Proposed Plan X
1100.1.9.3 - SROG Meter Details X
1100.1.9.4 - SROG Meter Electrical Plan X
1100.1.9.5 - SROG Meter Electrical Details X
1100.1.9.6 - SROG Meter Conduit Schedule X
1100.1.9.7 - Relocation Design for City of Peoria Water Facilities - 500LF and 3 Drop Sections X
1100.1.9.8 - Relocation Design for City of Glendale Water Facilities - 500LF and 3 Drop Sections X
1100.1.10 - Landscape Architectural and SWPPP Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review X
1100.1.11 - Maintenance of Traffic Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review X
1100.1.12 - Traffic Signal Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review X
1100.1.13 - ITS (Adaptive) Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review X
1100.1.14 - Roadway and Underdeck Lighting Design and Plan Development - Coordination and Review X
1100.1.15 - Signing and Pavement Marking Design and Plan Development X
1100.1.15.1 - Signing and Marking Notes X
1100.1.15.2 - Signing and Marking Quantity Summary X
1100.1.15.3 - Signing Summary Sheets X
1100.1.15.4 - Sign Format Sheets X
1100.1.15.5 - Signing and Marking Plans X
1100.1.16 - Special Provisions X
1100.1.17 - Construction Cost Estimates X
1100.2.- 60% PS&E Submittal X
1100.3.- 95% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Development X
1100.4.- 95% PS&E Submittal X
1100.5.- 100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Development X
1100.6.- 100% PS&E Submittal X
1100.7.- Sealed Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Development X
1100.8.- Constructability Review F FR
1100.9.- Construction Phasing F FR
1100.10.- Sealed PS&E Submittal X
Page 5 of 6
WBS 1/13/2021

NORTHERN PARKWAY: 99TH AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE
PROJECT NO. TT0372
CONTRACT NO. 2021-016
Work Breakdown Structure
60% 95% 100% Sealed
Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks Tasks
1300
Bidding Phase
1300.1.- Prepare Advertisement Package X
1300.2.- Submit Obligation Package X
1300.3.- Receive Federal Funding Authorization X
1300.4.- Advertisement X
1300.5.- Pre-Bid Conference X
1300.6.- Preparation of Addenda X
1300.7.- Bid Opening X
1300.8.- Hand-off Meeting with Construction X
1400
Construction Phase
1400.1.- Pre-Construction Conference C
1400.2.- Requests for Information (RFIs) C
1400.3.- Construction Start C
1400.4.- Complete Construction C
1400.5.- Project Close-out C
Note (*): For projects that do not include Conceptual Alternatives and only evaluate Candidate Alternatives, the deliverables that do not include the term “concept” will be included within the Candidate Alternative Stage.
LEGEND: "I" = Initial/Conceptual "X" = Completed "C" = Post Design Task
"FR" = Final (Incorporating prior submittal review comments; No design changes impacting R/W, environmental, or utility relocation activities without Management approval)
Page 6 of 6
WBS 1/13/2021

4561 East McDowell Road
Phoenix, Arizona 85008
602.454.0402
January 27, 2021
James Barr, PE
Vice President
T.Y. Lin International
james.barr@tylin.com
RE: Scope/Cost Estimate for Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
MCDOT Project Number: TT0372
Contract Number: 2021-006
Federal ID: MMA-0(281)D
ADOT Project Number: T0233
Mr. Barr:
Per your 12/22/2020 request, AZTEC is pleased to submit this scope of services and cost estimate to
complete the environmental reevaluation and traffic design for two signals.
The total cost estimate is $126,830.28.
We appreciate the opportunity to work with the T.Y. Lin International on this task. Should you have any
questions, please call me at 626.611.4846.
Sincerely,
Justin Hoppmann
Assistant Environmental Division Lead
AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc.
C: Mike Shirley, AZTEC

AZTEC SCOPE OF SERVICES
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
MCDOT Project Number: TT0372
Contract Number: 2021-006
Federal ID: MMA-0(281)D
ADOT Project Number: T0233
1. Task Understanding
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) requested this scope of services and
cost proposal to obtain Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT)/Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) clearance for improvements on Northern Parkway
segment between 99th Avenue and 87th Avenue including the Loop 101 traffic interchange (Project).
2. Assumptions
• ADOT Environmental Planning (EP) will be the lead federal agency under NEPA Assignment
(23 U.S.C. 327)
• An Environmental Assessment (EA) was completed in April 26, 2010 and a Reevaluation will be
completed following ADOT’s NEPA EA & EIS Guidance, currently dated April 2019
• MCDOT will provide the EA Reevaluation template and basic project information for the
updated technical documents and Reevaluation
• The EA Reevaluation will include the Project limits as analyzed in the original April 2010 EA
Northern Parkway corridor from SR 303 to US 60
• MCDOT will provide the geotechnical environmental clearance
• New right-of-way (ROW), easement, or temporary construction easements will be necessary
• New ROW will now be required from Tohono O’odham Nation (TON) that was not present
during the 2010 EA, coordination with TON and Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) will be required
• No geotechnical or potholing investigation is required
• It is anticipated that BIA will accept the original April 2010 EA and Reevaluation for their ROW
acquisition, thus a separate BIA clearance will not be required
• ADOT will provide the Air Quality Conformity Redetermination Form
• AZTEC will not be responsible for any Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES)
permit application (including Notice of Intent [NOI] or Notice of Termination [NOT]) or Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that may be required; we will ensure the standard
specification will include notification to the city’s MS4 within project limits
3. Scope of Work
Section 401/404 Permitting
• No work anticipated
Cultural Resources
• AZTEC anticipates no more than 40 acres of unpaved areas within the area of potential effects
(APE) will require a Class III cultural resource survey
AZTEC Scope of Services 1 January 27, 2021
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
MCDOT Project Number: TT0372 Contract Number: 2021-006

• Class III cultural resource survey and historic evaluation will be performed concurrently
• No fieldwork on TON land will be required for this project
• AZTEC anticipates using our blank ASM permit to complete the Class III cultural resource survey
• No new sites will be encountered
• Prepare Class III cultural resources survey report
• Prepare historic assessment
• Prepare project registration for ASM and closeout (Portal upload) for ADOT
• AZTEC is not responsible for preparing consultation letters
• Coordinate with MCDOT, TON, and ADOT staff
Biological Resources
• Conduct a site visit to identify areas of concern to sensitive and special status species, as well as
potential nesting areas for bird protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
• The US Fish and Wildlife Service Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPAC) system query
and an Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD) on-line environmental review tool will be
provided by ADOT
• Prepare AGFD scoping letter on ADOT’s letterhead that AZTEC will email on ADOT’s behalf
• Prepare scoping letters that will be sent to the TON biologist on ADOT’s behalf
• Prepare a Biological Evaluation Reevaluation Memo
• Coordinate with MCDOT and ADOT staff
Hazardous Materials
• As part of the Preliminary Initial Site Assessment (PISA), order and review GeoSearch
environmental database Radius Report
• Conduct a site visit as part of the PISA process, and obtain asbestos and lead samples of suspect
materials during site visit. For paint striping and other suspect hazardous materials that may be
encountered, up to 10 samples will be collected for testing for lead-based paint (LBP) and up to
14 samples will be collected for testing for asbestos containing materials (ACM).
• Submit the collected samples to a certified laboratory to analyze for the presence of LBP and
ACM
• Prepare a PISA Report, documenting the methodology and findings from the Radius Report and
the site visit. Report will include the ‘DRAFT PISA’ form.
• Prepare a Hazardous Materials Evaluation Report (HMER), documenting the sampling
methodology and laboratory test results for the LBP and ACM samples
• Coordinate with MCDOT and ADOT staff
Noise Resources
• Prepare Noise Analysis Validation Form (Note-to-File) to confirm original 2010 Noise Analysis is
still valid
Other Resources
• No Section 6(f) resources are present within the project limits
AZTEC Scope of Services 2 January 27, 2021
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
MCDOT Project Number: TT0372 Contract Number: 2021-006

• One Section 4(f) resource is located within the project limits that will be reevaluated to confirm
impacts; AZTEC will fill out the appropriate ADOT Section 4(f) form upon coordination with
MCDOT and ADOT
• A separate socioeconomic document/memo will not be prepared, all new data will be included
in the Reevaluation
• Per April 2010 EA, Natural Resources Conservation Services concluded the Farmland Protection
Policy would not be required and thus Farmland Conversion Impact Rating forms (NRCS-CPA-
106) will not be required for this reevaluation
• AZTEC will reevaluate soil maps and potential impacts to farmlands
• Irrigation relocation/reconfiguration coordination with landowners will be completed by either
design or utility team
• Coordinate with MCDOT and ADOT staff
Environmental Clearance – EA Reevaluation – 100 hours
• Evaluate mitigation measures from April 2010 EA and update/remove as necessary
• Prepare EA Reevaluation
• Coordinate with MCDOT and ADOT staff
Public/Agency Scoping
• AZTEC will prepare up to three (3) PowerPoint slides or boards for public meeting
• One (1) AZTEC staff will attend one (1) public meeting either via virtual or in person within the
vicinity of the project limits
• Public meeting summary will be prepared by T.Y. Lin
• No additional agency coordination will be completed beyond coordination with BIA and TON
that was not previously completed for the April 2010 EA
Traffic Engineering
• AZTEC will provide Traffic Signal design plans for the intersections of Northern Parkway/91st
Avenue and Northern Parkway/93rd Avenue.
• The Traffic Signal design plans will be prepared for 60%, 95%, 100%, and Sealed submittals. The
design plans will be in accordance with the City of Peoria Traffic Signal Plan Checklist and
Process Guide, the MCDOT Signal Design Checklist (where applicable) and include the following
design plan sheets
o Cover Sheet
o Sheet 2 – General Notes Sheet
o Sheet 3 – Intersection Plan View
o Sheet 4 – Equipment Schedule
• The Traffic Signal design plans will be prepared using the computer software Microstation, in
accordance with the MCDOT Plan Development Manual and MCDOT CADD Standards.
• The Traffic Signal design plans will be prepared to coordinate with other discipline CADD base
files provided by TYLIN or others.
AZTEC Scope of Services 3 January 27, 2021
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
MCDOT Project Number: TT0372 Contract Number: 2021-006

• AZTEC will provide a single clearance interval memo to provide clearance intervals for both
traffic signal designs. The memo will accompany each traffic signal design submittal and will be
prepared in accordance with the City of Peoria Traffic Signal Clearance Policy.
• AZTEC will prepare engineering cost estimates to accompany each submittal of the traffic signal
design plans. AZTEC will submit an excel spreadsheet of the traffic signal cost estimates to
TYLIN for compilation with the overall project cost estimate through the MCDOT Cost
Estimation Tool.
• AZTEC will provide necessary special provisions for items relating to traffic signal design
elements. The special provisions will accompany each submittal of the traffic signal design
plans.
• The following items are excluded from this scope of services,
o Traffic signal plans for intersections other than Northern Parkway/91St Avenue and
Northern Parkway/93rd Avenue.
o Signing and Pavement Marking plans, ITS plans, Maintenance of Traffic Plans, Roadway
Lighting Plans or photometric analysis, and Pedestrian Ramp/Roadway Plans.
o Traffic counts and traffic analysis reports.
o Power Service Request Letters, it is anticipated both proposed traffic signals will use
existing traffic signal power sources.
o Post Design Services.
• AZTEC will attend up to 24 project coordination meetings (2 hours each) via video or telephone
conference, and one comment resolution meeting after each submittal (3 meetings, 3 hours
each).
Task Management and Meetings – 2 hours for meetings
• Regular coordination with MCODT, design team, and EP throughout the project duration
• Internal coordination with AZTEC staff regarding project schedule, budget, and scope of work
• Up to two (2) AZTEC staff will attend up to 24 meetings via video or telephone conference, with
associated prep and follow up.
4. Deliverables
All deliverables are anticipated to consist of a preliminary draft submitted to the MCDOT for initial
review, a draft submitted to ADOT EP once the MCDOT’s comments have been incorporated, and a
final version submitted to the MCDOT and ADOT EP for concurrent approval. Deliverables include:
• Biological Evaluation Reevaluation Memo
• Class III Survey Report
• Hazardous materials site investigation summary
• Noise Analysis Validation Form
• EA Re-Evaluation (draft and final)
AZTEC Scope of Services 4 January 27, 2021
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
MCDOT Project Number: TT0372 Contract Number: 2021-006

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc.
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR
PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
ENV Coordinator/Manager 123 $ 65.85 $ 8,100
Senior ENV Planner/Scientist 161 $ 53.31 $ 8,583
ENV Planner/Scientist 194 $ 41.40 $ 8,032
Associate ENV Planner/Scientist 56 $ 25.69 $ 1,439
Engineer / Designer 204 $ 40.26 $ 8,213
Senior Engineer 22 $ 72.60 $ 1,597
Project Engineer 136 $ 56.67 $ 7,707
896 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost $ 43,671
Overhead 161.51% $ 70,533
Subtotal $ 114,204
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Mileage (48mi round trip x2 trips) $ 0.54 $ 51.84
Lead Sample Analysis (24) $ 8.50 $ 204.00
Asbestos Sample Analysis (100) $ 7.50 $ 750.00
Environmental Database Report $ 200.00 $ 200.00
Total Estimated Expenses $ 1,205.84
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
$ -
$ -
Total Estimated Outside Services $ -
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 11,420.40
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $ 126,830.28
CONTRACT TIME Calendar Days
1/27/2021
Consultant Firm Signature Date
3/26/2013 Page 1 of 3

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc.
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS - PHASE
Senior
ENV ENV
TASK Scale No Hours/ Coordinator/ ENV Planner/ Associate ENV Engineer / Senior Project Designer Total
Shts Sheet Planner/S Planner/Scientist Designer Engineer Engineer
Manager Scientist
cientist
$ 65.85 $ 53.31 $ 41.40 $ 25.69 $ 40.26 $ 72.60 $ 56.67 $ -
Cultural Resources
Fieldwork includes prep 20 10 30.0
Class III Report 50 30 80.0
Curation/Portal Upload 8 8.0
Coordination 8 8.0
QA/QC 8 8.0
Biological Resources
Field site visit includes prep and travel 1 8 4 13.0
AGFD and TON biological scoping 6 2 8.0
BE Reevaluation Memo 2 14 16.0
QA/QC 4 4.0
Hazardous Materials
Fieldwork - LBP/ACM testing 10 10 20.0
PISA & HMER Report 6 20 26.0
Order and review GeoSearch report 5 5.0
QA/QC 4 4.0
Noise Resources
Noise Analysis Valdation Form 4 4.0
QA/QC 1 1.0
Other Resources
Section 4(f) review, form, coordination 4 10 14.0
Socioeconmic update tables 2 12 14.0
Farm.land/soils review 10 10.0
EA Reevaluation
Draft Document (including graphics) 4 16 20.0
QA/QC Draft 1 1.0
Final Document 8 8.0
QA/QC Final 1 1.0
Public/Agency Scoping
Prepare meeting materials 2 6 8.0
Attend public meeting 5 5 10.0
BIA and TON agency scoping letters 2 8 10.0
Traffic Engineering
Northern Parkway/91st Avenue 3 76 14 90.0
Northern Parkway/93rd Avenue 3 76 14 90.0
Traffic Signal Cover Sheets 2 16 2 18.0
Signal Timing Clearance Memo 24 6 30.0
Special Provisions 24 24.0
Engineering Estimate 12 12 24.0
QA/QC 18 18.0
Task Management & Meetings
Coordination with design, MCDOT, and ADOT 24 60 30 12 126.0
Internal coordiation, project schedule, budget, etc. 24 8 8 5 4 49.0
Project Meetings (24 total) 48 48 96.0
8 112 123 161 194 56 204 22 136 896.0
3/26/2013 Page 2 of 3

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc.
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES
Travel
A. Local Mileage at
$ 0.54 96 miles
Subtotal Travel $ 52
Plotting
B. Exhibits at exhibits
C. Plots at plots
$ -
D. Plan Submittals
Half Size Bond Copies at Copies
Full Size Bond Copies at Copies
Subtotal Plotting $ -
Miscellaneous Expenses
Lead Sample Analysis (24) $ 204
Asbestos Sample Analysis (100) $ 750
Environmental Database Report $ 200
Subtotal Miscellaneous Expenses $ 1,154
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES & CONSULTANTS
$ -
$ -
TOTAL ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES $ -
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES $ 1,206
3/26/2013 Page 3 of 3

1500 N. Priest Drive | Suite 102 | Tempe, AZ 85281 | 602.244.8100
Mr. James Barr, PE Re: Contract No. 2021-016
Vice President Northern Parkway:
TY Lin International 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
60 East Rio Salado Parkway, Suite 501 Fee Proposal
Tempe, AZ 85281
February 4, 2021
PROJECT: Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
Final Design
PROJECT NO.: TT0372
Dear Mr. Barr:
Burgess & Niple is pleased to submit the attached Scope of Work and Derivation of Cost / Labor Hour Estimates for
the above referenced project.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 602-244-8100 (x5332) if you have any questions.
Respectfully,
Jason Pagnard, PE
Vice President
Jason.Pagnard@burgessniple.com
Copy: File

Scope of Services
Scoping Design Services
NORTHERN PARKWAY:
99TH AVENUE TO 87TH AVENUE
Consultant: Burgess & Niple, Inc.
Project No: TT0372
Contract No.: 2021-016
Maricopa County
Department of Transportation
2901 W. Durango Street
Phoenix, AZ 85009
February 2021

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
Table of Contents
SCOPE OF SERVICES – PROJECT SPECIFIC ...........................................................................................1
Project Overview .................................................................................................................................... 1
Project Location ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Project Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Length of Services................................................................................................................................... 1
SECTION 100 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................1
100.2 Project Initiation ............................................................................................................... 1
100.2.1 Matrix of Responsibilities .................................................................................................. 1
100.2.2 Matrix of Deliverables ....................................................................................................... 1
100.3 Kick-Off Meeting ............................................................................................................... 3
100.6 Project Progress Meetings ................................................................................................ 3
100.8 Field Walk with Project Team ........................................................................................... 3
100.12 Project Administration ...................................................................................................... 3
SECTION 400 PROJECT COORDINATION ...............................................................................................3
400.3 Stakeholder Meetings ....................................................................................................... 3
400.3 Public Involvement Activities ............................................................................................ 3
400.6 60% Public Project Update Activity and Feedback ........................................................... 3
400.8 Project Specific Partnering Special Provisions .................................................................. 3
400.9 Intergovernmental and Maintenance Agreements Identification .................................... 3
400.11 Project Coordination ......................................................................................................... 4
SECTION 500 UTILITIES AND RAILROAD ...............................................................................................4
500.5 Pothole Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross Sections .......................................................... 4
500.10 Proposed Utility Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross Sections ............................................ 4
SECTION 800 TECHNICAL MEMORANDA AND REPORTS ............................................................................4
800.1 Traffic Analysis Report ...................................................................................................... 4
SECTION 1100 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS ..............................................................................................4
1100.1 60% Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development ..................................................... 4
1100.1.1 ADOT Standard Drawing Sheets .................................................................................... 5
1100.1.2 Typical Section Sheets ................................................................................................... 5
1100.1.3 Northern Avenue Plan Sheets ........................................................................................ 5
1100.1.4 Northern Avenue Profile Sheets .................................................................................... 5
1100.1.5 Ramp Plan Sheets .......................................................................................................... 6
1100.1.6 Ramp Profile Sheets ....................................................................................................... 6
1100.1.7 Driveway Profile Sheet................................................................................................... 6
1100.1.8 Intersection Detail Sheets .............................................................................................. 6
1100.1.9 Joint Detail Sheets ......................................................................................................... 6
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page i of ii

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
1100.1.10 Detail Sheets .................................................................................................................. 6
1100.1.11 Traffic Control Notes Sheets .......................................................................................... 6
1100.1.12 Traffic Control Quantities Sheets ................................................................................... 6
1100.1.13 Maintenance of Traffic Phasing Sheets ......................................................................... 6
1100.1.14 Advanced Warning Signs Plan Sheets ........................................................................... 6
1100.1.15 Trailblazing Plan Sheets ................................................................................................. 6
1100.1.16 Traffic Control Plan Sheets ............................................................................................ 6
1100.1.17 Temporary Signal Sheets ............................................................................................... 6
1100.1.18 Signing and Striping Notes Sheet .................................................................................. 7
1100.1.19 Striping Quantities Sheet ............................................................................................... 7
1100.1.20 Sign Summary Sheets .................................................................................................... 7
1100.1.21 Signing and Striping Plan Sheets ................................................................................... 7
1100.1.22 Sign Format Sheets ........................................................................................................ 7
1100.1.23 Sign Structures Sheets ................................................................................................... 7
1100.1.24 Signal Notes Sheet ......................................................................................................... 7
1100.1.25 Signal Plan Sheets .......................................................................................................... 7
1100.1.26 Signal Pole Schedule Sheets ........................................................................................... 7
1100.1.27 Signal Conductor Schedule Sheets ................................................................................. 7
1100.1.28 Specification and Special Provision Preparation ........................................................... 7
1100.1.29 Estimate ......................................................................................................................... 8
1100.1.30 Corridor Model Development ........................................................................................ 8
1100.1.31 Western Terminus Development ................................................................................... 8
1100.2 60% PS&E Submittal .......................................................................................................... 8
1100.3 95% Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development ..................................................... 8
1100.4 95% PS&E Submittal .......................................................................................................... 8
1100.5 100% Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development ................................................... 8
1100.6 100% PS&E Submittal ........................................................................................................ 8
1100.7 Sealed Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development ................................................. 8
1100.9 Construction Phasing ........................................................................................................ 8
1100.10 Sealed PS&E Submittal ...................................................................................................... 8
List of Tables
Table 1 – Matrix of Responsibilities ........................................................................................................... 1
Table 2 – Matrix of Deliverables ................................................................................................................. 2
List of Appendices
Appendix B&N - A Derivation of Cost
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page ii of ii

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
SCOPE OF SERVICES – PROJECT SPECIFIC
Project Overview
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) has requested services from TY Lin
International (Prime) to prepare construction documents for the project. Burgess & Niple, Inc.
(Consultant) is a subconsultant to Prime and will provide roadway and traffic engineering services. The
Derivation of Cost is provided in Appendix B&N - A.
Project Location
The Northern Parkway Program consists of new construction of a Northern Parkway alignment and
reconstruction of portions of Northern Avenue in northwestern Maricopa County. This project includes
the reconstruction of Northern Avenue from 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue, including reconstructing the
Northern Avenue traffic interchange (TI) with SR-101L (Loop 101). Northern Avenue separates the cities
of Peoria to the north and Glendale to the south.
Project Purpose
The project purpose is to perform final design and prepare construction documents based on the scoping
documents prepared as part of TT0573.
The Consultant will provide, in U. S. customary units (English), engineering services described herein that
are required to prepare construction documents for this project.
Length of Services
It is anticipated that all services will be completed within 1,888 calendar-days after notice to proceed
(NTP) has been issued. It is anticipated that the NTP will be issued March 15, 2021.
SECTION 100 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
100.2 Project Initiation
100.2.1 Matrix of Responsibilities
Table 1 is a summary of the division of responsibilities among the Prime and Consultant.
Table 1 – Matrix of Responsibilities
Scope
Item Prime Consultant
Section
100 Project Management X X
400 Project Coordination X X
500 Utilities and Railroad X X
800 Technical Memoranda and Reports X
1100 Plans, Specifications and Estimate X X
100.2.2 Matrix of Deliverables
Table 2 provides a list of all deliverables for each submittal stage of the project.
MicroStation design software will be used to develop CADD deliverables using MCDOT’s CADD
Standards. All deliverables will be submitted electronically to the Prime.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page 1 of 8

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
Table 2 – Matrix of Deliverables
FINAL DESIGN PHASE
60% PS&E 95% PS&E 100% PS&E Sealed
Supplier Milestone Submittal Item Submittal Submittal Submittal PS&E
Traffic Traffic Analysis TM F,S
Roadway ADOT Standard Drawing Sheets D D F S
Roadway Typical Section Sheets D D F S
Roadway Northern Avenue Plan Sheets D D F S
Roadway Northern Avenue Profile Sheets D D F S
Roadway Ramp Plan Sheets D D F S
Roadway Ramp Profile Sheets D D F S
Roadway Driveway Profile Sheet D D F S
Roadway Intersection Detail Sheets D D F S
Roadway Joint Detail Sheets D D F S
Roadway Detail Sheets D D F S
Traffic Traffic Control Notes Sheets D D F S
Traffic Traffic Control Quantities Sheets D D F S
Traffic Maintenance of Traffic Phasing
D D F S
Sheets
Traffic Advanced Warning Signs Plan Sheets D D F S
Traffic Trailblazing Signs Plan Sheets D D F S
Traffic Traffic Control Plan Sheets D D F S
Traffic Temporary Signal Sheets D D F S
Traffic Signing and Striping Notes Sheet D D F S
Traffic Striping Quantities Sheet D D F S
Traffic Sign Summary Sheets D D F S
Traffic Signing and Striping Plan Sheets D D F S
Traffic Sign Format Sheet D D F S
Traffic Sign Structure Sheets D D F S
Traffic Signal Notes Sheet D D F S
Traffic Signal Plan Sheets D D F S
Traffic Signal Pole Schedule Sheets D D F S
Traffic Signal Conductor Schedule Sheets D D F S
Roadway
D D F S
and Traffic Specification and Special Provisions
Estimates Quantities and Cost Estimate D D F F
All
D D F F
Designers Final Design Calculations
All
D D F F
Designers CADD Files (graphic, ascii, dtm, etc.)
D = Draft | F = Final | S = Sealed
TM = Technical Memorandum
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page 2 of 8

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
100.3 Kick-Off Meeting
The Kick-Off Meeting (KOM) will take place virtually. The meeting is anticipated to last approximately
two (2) hours. The Consultant will have two (2) representatives attend the KOM.
100.6 Project Progress Meetings
Project Progress Meetings shall take place approximately once every month for the duration of the
project beginning the month after the KOM. An estimated thirty (30) meetings are anticipated. Meetings
prior to September 1, 2021, will take place virtually; meetings after September 1, 2021, will take place
at the MCDOT offices located at 2901 W. Durango Street, Phoenix, Arizona. Each meeting will last
approximately one (1) hour. The Consultant will have two (2) representatives in attendance at each
meeting. It is anticipated that the Prime will prepare all meeting materials.
100.8 Field Walk with Project Team
The Consultant will attend two field meetings with the project team. Each meeting will last
approximately three (3) hours. The Consultant will have three (3) representatives in attendance at each
meeting. It is anticipated that the Prime will prepare all meeting materials.
100.12 Project Administration
The Consultant project manager will provide monthly progress reports and submit monthly invoices to
the Prime in a format approved by MCDOT. The Consultant will set up and administer the project.
SECTION 400 PROJECT COORDINATION
400.3 Stakeholder Meetings
The Consultant will participate in stakeholder coordination to build and maintain consensus among the
project partners as needed. An allowance of eighty (80) hours is provided for this task
400.3 Public Involvement Activities
The Consultant will prepare a maximum of two electronic exhibits depicting the proposed improvements
at the Northern Avenue TI with Loop 101. The Consultant will provide the electronic exhibits to the Prime
for production. The Consultant will not produce hard copies of the exhibits.
400.6 60% Public Project Update Activity and Feedback
The Consultant will attend one (1) public meeting. The public meeting is anticipated to occur near the
project site. The public meeting is anticipated to have a duration of three (3) hours. The Consultant will
have two (2) representative in attendance at the meeting.
400.8 Project Specific Partnering Special Provisions
The Consultant will coordinate with the project partners to identify special provision needs pertaining
to the improvement elements identified in Section 1100.1.
400.9 Intergovernmental and Maintenance Agreements Identification
The Consultant will coordinate with partner agencies to identify Intergovernmental and Maintenance
Agreement needs pertaining to the improvement elements identified in Section 1100.1. It is anticipated
that the Prime will complete all tasks related to the production of the Intergovernmental Agreement.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page 3 of 8

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
400.11 Project Coordination
The Consultant will participate in recurring design team coordination and conference calls throughout
the project. An allowance of twenty (20) hours is provided for this task. An additional allowance of sixty
(60) hours is provided for inter-discipline coordination.
SECTION 500 UTILITIES AND RAILROAD
500.5 Pothole Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross Sections
The Consultant will place pothole data on the plan and profile sheets identified in Section 1100.1.
The Prime will provide all pothole data. It is assumed that the utility basemap will be a 2D file. Placing
utility data on cross sections is not included.
500.10 Proposed Utility Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross Sections
The Consultant will place proposed utility data on the plan and profile sheets identified in Section
1100.1.
The Prime will provide all proposed utility data. It is assumed that the utility basemap will be a 2D file.
Placing utility data on cross sections is not included.
SECTION 800 TECHNICAL MEMORANDA AND REPORTS
800.1 Traffic Analysis Report
The Consultant will refine, update, and finalize the sealed Traffic Analysis TM prepared as part of the
TT0573 scoping effort. The design phase Traffic Technical Memo shall be an updated Final version,
confirming the initial assumptions and analysis, including number of lanes, lane configurations, storage
bay lengths, projected Level of Service for segments and at all major intersections within the project and
the Loop 101 TI (DDI configuration). Traffic signal timing and progression analysis shall be included.
The Consultant will evaluate the traffic operations for a maximum of three (3) intersection
configurations at Northern Avenue and 89th Avenue. An allowance of eighty (80) hours is included
within this task for efforts at 89th Avenue.
The Consultant will provide traffic operations analysis support for design efforts at the Northern Avenue
intersection with 98th Avenue. An allowance of eighty (80) hours is included within this task for efforts
at 98th Avenue.
SECTION 1100 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS
1100.1 60% Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development
The Consultant will design and prepare the construction documents listed and described herein for the
following geographic limits and disciplines:
• Northern Avenue from approximately 100 feet east of the centerline 98th Avenue to
approximately 950 feet west of the centerline of 93rd Avenue (approximate total length of 2,265
feet)
o Roadway sheets including typical section sheets, detail sheets, plan sheets, profile
sheets, driveway profile sheets, intersection detail sheets, and joint detail sheets;
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page 4 of 8

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
o Traffic sheets including signing and striping notes sheets, striping quantity sheets, sign
summary sheets, and signing and striping plan sheets;
o Traffic sheets including the signal notes sheet, signal plan sheets, and signal schedule
sheets for the signalized intersections of Northern Avenue and the Loop 101 ramps; and
o Specifications and Special Provisions for the roadway and traffic design elements.
• Loop 101 entrance and exit ramps at Northern Avenue
o Roadway sheets including typical section sheets, detail sheets, plan sheets, profile
sheets, and joint detail sheets;
o Traffic sheets including signing and striping notes sheets, striping quantity sheets, sign
summary sheets, and signing and striping plan sheets; and
o Specifications and Special Provisions for the roadway and traffic design elements.
• Project Wide
o Traffic control/maintenance of traffic sheets including traffic control notes sheets,
traffic control quantities sheets, maintenance of traffic phasing sheets, advanced
warning signs plan sheets, trailblazing plan sheets, and traffic control plan sheets;
o Traffic sheets including overhead sign format sheets and overhead sign structure sheets;
and
o Specifications and Special Provisions for the traffic control and traffic design elements
performed by Consultant.
The Consultant will coordinate with other project disciplines to prepare the construction documents,
but the Consultant will not design or prepare the construction documents for drainage, intelligent traffic
systems (ITS), lighting, landscaping, aesthetics, structures or other overlapping design elements not
explicitly mentioned. The Consultant will not prepare cross sections.
1100.1.1 ADOT Standard Drawing Sheets
The Consultant will develop ADOT standard drawing sheets for all roadway and traffic items. This work
consists of five (5) sheets. The Prime will be responsible for developing any non-roadway or non-traffic
related ADOT standard drawing sheets.
1100.1.2 Typical Section Sheets
The Consultant will develop roadway typical sections for the limits of work listed above in Section 1100.1
utilizing typical sections created during scoping as a basis. This work consists of seven (7) typical sections
for a total of four (4) typical section sheets.
1100.1.3 Northern Avenue Plan Sheets
The Consultant will develop six (6) roadway plan sheets along Northern Avenue at 20 scale for the limits
of work listed above in Section 1100.1, utilizing the plan sheets developed during scoping as a basis.
1100.1.4 Northern Avenue Profile Sheets
The Consultant will develop twelve (12) roadway profile sheets along Northern Avenue at 20 scale
horizontal and 2 scale vertical for the limits of work listed above in Section 1100.1, utilizing the profile
sheets developed during scoping as a basis. There will be two centerline (2) profiles throughout the Loop
101 interchange.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page 5 of 8

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
1100.1.5 Ramp Plan Sheets
The Consultant will develop eight (8) ramp plan sheets along the four (4) Loop 101 ramps at 20 scale
utilizing the plan sheets developed during scoping as a basis.
1100.1.6 Ramp Profile Sheets
The Consultant will develop twelve (12) ramp profile sheets along the four (4) Loop 101 ramps at 20
scale horizontal and 2 scale vertical utilizing the profile sheets developed during scoping as a basis.
1100.1.7 Driveway Profile Sheet
The Consultant will develop driveway profiles for three (3) driveways within the limits of work listed
above in Section 1100.1. These profiles will be placed on one (1) driveway profile sheet at 20 scale
horizontal and 2 scale vertical utilizing the profile sheets developed during scoping as a basis.
1100.1.8 Intersection Detail Sheets
The Consultant will develop four (4) Intersection Detail sheets at the Loop 101 TI DDI crossover locations
at 20 scale.
1100.1.9 Joint Detail Sheets
The Consultant will develop seven (7) PCCP Joint Layout Detail sheets for the limits of PCCP pavement
within the limits of work listed above in Section 1100.1. These sheets will be at 40 scale.
1100.1.10 Detail Sheets
The Consultant will develop five (5) detail sheets for detailing of the four (4) splitter islands at the Loop
101 TI and the median island under the Loop 101 bridge.
1100.1.11 Traffic Control Notes Sheets
The Consultant will develop three (3) traffic control note sheets incorporating requirements from
MCDOT, ADOT, Peoria, and Glendale
1100.1.12 Traffic Control Quantities Sheets
The Consultant will develop one (1) traffic control quantity sheets.
1100.1.13 Maintenance of Traffic Phasing Sheets
The Consultant will develop ten (10) Maintenance of Traffic Phasing sheets at 10 scale.
1100.1.14 Advanced Warning Signs Plan Sheets
The Consultant will develop six (6) Advanced Warning Signs plan sheets.
1100.1.15 Trailblazing Plan Sheets
The Consultant will develop four (4) Trailblazing plan sheets.
1100.1.16 Traffic Control Plan Sheets
The Consultant will develop forty-two (42) Traffic Control plan sheets at 50 scale.
1100.1.17 Temporary Signal Sheets
The Consultant will develop twenty-four (24) Temporary Signal Sheets. Temporary Signal Sheets will be
prepared for temporary signals at six (6) Northern Avenue intersections: 99th Avenue, 98th Avenue,
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page 6 of 8

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
Loop 101 southbound ramps, Loop 101 northbound ramps, 93rd Avenue, and 91st Avenue. It is
anticipated that two (2) unique temporary signal configurations will be required for each signal. It is
anticipated that each configuration will require two (2) sheets.
1100.1.18 Signing and Striping Notes Sheet
The Consultant will develop one (1) signing and striping notes sheet incorporating standard notes from
MCDOT, ADOT, and City of Peoria. The Prime will be responsible for any other required agency notes.
1100.1.19 Striping Quantities Sheet
The Consultant will develop one (1) striping quantity sheet for the limits of work listed above in Section
1100.1.
1100.1.20 Sign Summary Sheets
The Consultant will develop five (5) sign summary sheets for the limits of work listed above in Section
1100.1.
1100.1.21 Signing and Striping Plan Sheets
The Consultant will develop seven (7) signing and striping plan sheets at 40 scale for the limits of work
listed above in Section 1100.1, utilizing the striping plan sheets developed during scoping as a basis.
1100.1.22 Sign Format Sheets
The Consultant will develop four (4) Sign Format Sheets detailing a maximum of twenty (20) specialty
sign panels meeting ADOT and MCDOT standards.
1100.1.23 Sign Structures Sheets
The Consultant will develop four (4) Sign Structure sheets, one for each of the four (4) overhead sign
structures.
1100.1.24 Signal Notes Sheet
The Consultant will develop one (1) Signal Note sheet incorporating standard notes from ADOT and
Peoria.
1100.1.25 Signal Plan Sheets
The Consultant will develop two (2) signal plan sheets for the limits of work listed above in Section
1100.1 at 20 scale, utilizing the signal plan sheets developed during scoping as a basis.
1100.1.26 Signal Pole Schedule Sheets
The Consultant will develop two (2) signal pole schedule sheets for the corresponding signal plan sheets.
1100.1.27 Signal Conductor Schedule Sheets
The Consultant will develop two (2) signal conductor schedule sheets for the corresponding signal plan
sheets.
1100.1.28 Specification and Special Provision Preparation
The Consultant will develop specifications for the work listed above in Section 1100.1 with input from
partner agencies as detailed in Section 400.8. The specifications will be delivered in Word format. The
Prime will be responsible for incorporating these specifications into the final Special Provisions for the
project.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page 7 of 8

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
1100.1.29 Estimate
The Consultant will develop quantities for work listed above in Section 1100.1 and provide unit pricing
for items unique to these limits of work. The Prime will be responsible for incorporating these quantities
and unit prices into the final Engineer’s Estimate.
1100.1.30 Corridor Model Development
The Consultant will develop a new corridor model in OpenRoads Designer for the limits of work listed
above in Section 1100.1. Cross sections of the corridor model are not included.
1100.1.31 Western Terminus Development
The Consultant will assist the Prime in development of conceptual alternatives for the Western Terminus
of the project. No plan sheets are included in this task. An allowance of 56 hours is included for this task.
1100.2 60% PS&E Submittal
The Consultant will have senior staff perform an internal technical review on deliverables. The
Consultant will create and deliver submittal documents.
1100.3 95% Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development
The Consultant will update the plans, specifications and estimate elements identified in Section 1100.1
per comments received from MCDOT, ADOT, Peoria and Glendale. The hours and fee to complete this
task is included within the Section 1100.1 subsections.
1100.4 95% PS&E Submittal
The Consultant will have senior staff perform an internal technical review on deliverables. The
Consultant will create and deliver submittal documents.
1100.5 100% Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development
The Consultant will update the plans, specifications and estimate elements identified in Section 1100.1
per comments received from MCDOT, ADOT, Peoria and Glendale. The hours and fee to complete this
task is included within the Section 1100.1 subsections.
1100.6 100% PS&E Submittal
The Consultant will have senior staff perform an internal technical review on deliverables. The
Consultant will create and deliver submittal documents.
1100.7 Sealed Plans, Specifications and Estimate Development
The Consultant will update the plans, specifications and estimate elements identified in Section 1100.1
per comments received from MCDOT, ADOT, Peoria and Glendale. The hours and fee to complete this
task is included within the Section 1100.1 subsections.
1100.9 Construction Phasing
The Consultant will investigate and develop construction phasing for roadway improvements to be
constructed utilizing the TT0372 construction documents. The effort to detail the construction phasing
within the plan set is covered in Section 1100.1.
1100.10 Sealed PS&E Submittal
The Consultant will seal and submit the plans, specifications and estimate elements identified in Section
1100.1.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021 Page 8 of 8

Scope of Services
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
APPENDIX B&N - A
DERIVATION OF COST
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
February 4, 2021

Northern Parkway, 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue Burgess & Niple, Inc.
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR
PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
Sr. Project Manager 128 $ 79.38 $ 10,161
Sr. Engineer 854 $ 63.64 $ 54,349
Engineer 4 1,026 $ 53.63 $ 55,024
Engineer 3 990 $ 47.79 $ 47,312
Engineer 2 1,044 $ 39.93 $ 41,687
Engineer 1 1,024 $ 36.19 $ 37,059
GIS/Graphics 80 $ 40.88 $ 3,270
Contract Administrator 120 $ 35.25 $ 4,230
Intern 32 $ 20.00 $ 640
5,298 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost $ 253,732
Overhead 188.21% $ 477,549
Subtotal $ 731,281
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Travel $ 451
Plotting $ -
Miscellaneous Expenses $ -
Total Estimated Expenses $ 451
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
N/A $ -
$ -
Total Estimated Outside Services $ -
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 73,128.10
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $ 804,860
CONTRACT TIME Calendar Days 1888
2/4/2021
Consultant Firm Signature Date
2/4/2021 Page 1 of 4

Northern Parkway, 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue Burgess & Niple, Inc.
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS - Final Design
Contract
TASK Scale No Hours/ Sr. Project Sr. Engineer 4 Engineer 3 Engineer 2 Engineer 1 GIS/Graphi Administra Intern Total
Shts Sheet Manager Engineer cs
tor
Section 100 - Project Management
Task 100.3 Kick-Off Meeting 4 12 16.0
Task 100.6 Project Progress Meetings 90 90 180.0
Task 100.8 Field Walk with Project Team 10 10 10 30.0
Task 100.12 Project Administration 40 40 120 200.0
Task 400 - Project Coordination
Task 400.1 Stakeholder Meetings 40 20 20 80.0
Task 400.3 Public Involvement Activities 16 16 80 112.0
Task 400.6 60% Public Project Update Activity and Feedback 8 12 20.0
Task 400.8 Project Specific Partnering Special Provisions 24 40 40 104.0
Task 400.9 Intergovernmental and Maintenance Agreements Identification 4 12 12 28.0
Task 400.11 Project Coordination 20 20 20 20 80.0
Section 500 - Utilities and Railroad
Task 500.5 Pothole Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections 10 30 40.0
Task 500.10 Proposed Utility Data on Plans, Profiles and Cross-Sections 20 60 20 100.0
Section 800 - Technical Memoranda and Reports
Task 800.1 Traffic Analysis 56 84 200 340.0
Task 1100 - Plans, Specifications and Estimate
Task 1100.1 60% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Development
Task 1100.1.01 ADOT Standard Drawing Sheets N/A 1 8 4 4 8.0
Task 1100.1.02 Typical Section Sheets N/A 4 10 4 12 8 16 40.0
Task 1100.1.03 Northern Avenue Plan Sheets 20 6 28 4 16 32 44 56 16 168.0
Task 1100.1.04 Northern Avenue Profile Sheets 20 12 16 4 24 48 56 64 196.0
Task 1100.1.05 Ramp Plan Sheets 20 8 24 8 28 40 56 60 192.0
Task 1100.1.06 Ramp Profile Sheets 20 12 12 8 28 48 36 24 144.0
Task 1100.1.07 Driveway Profile Sheet 20 1 24 4 8 12 24.0
Task 1100.1.08 Intersection Detail Sheets 20 4 24 4 24 32 20 16 96.0
Task 1100.1.09 Joint Detail Sheets 40 7 21 8 20 40 40 40 148.0
Task 1100.1.10 Detail Sheets N/A 5 24 4 24 32 32 28 120.0
Task 1100.1.11 Traffic Control Notes Sheets N/A 3 12 8 8 12 8 36.0
Task 1100.1.12 Traffic Control Quantities Sheets N/A 1 24 4 4 8 8 24.0
Task 1100.1.13 Maintenance of Traffic Phasing Sheets 250 10 9 16 32 42 90.0
Task 1100.1.14 Advanced Warning Signs Plan Sheets N/A 6 8 12 16 20 48.0
Task 1100.1.15 Trailblazing Plan Sheets N/A 4 12 12 16 20 48.0
Task 1100.1.16 Traffic Control Plan Sheets 50 42 18 100 120 140 180 200 16 756.0
Task 1100.1.17 Temporary Signal Sheets 40 24 10 60 40 100 40 240.0
Task 1100.1.18 Signing and Striping Notes Sheet N/A 1 8 2 2 4 8.0
Task 1100.1.19 Striping Quantities Sheet N/A 1 28 4 8 8 8 28.0
Task 1100.1.20 Sign Summary Sheets N/A 5 20 4 12 24 28 32 100.0
Task 1100.1.21 Signing and Striping Plan Sheets 40 7 20 16 16 24 36 48 140.0
Task 1100.1.22 Sign Format Sheet N/A 4 36 16 24 32 36 36 144.0
Task 1100.1.23 Sign Structures Sheets N/A 4 16 4 8 12 16 24 64.0
Task 1100.1.24 Signal Notes Sheet N/A 1 24 12 12 24.0
Task 1100.1.25 Signal Plan Sheets 20 2 24 4 8 16 20 48.0
Task 1100.1.26 Signal Pole Schedule Sheets N/A 2 16 4 4 12 12 32.0
Task 1100.1.27 Signal Conductor Schedule Sheets N/A 2 16 4 4 12 12 32.0
Task 1100.1.28 Specification and Special Provision Preparation N/A N/A 40 40 40 80 200.0
Task 1100.1.29 Estimate N/A N/A 12 48 60 20 38 178.0
Task 1100.1.30 Corridor Model Development N/A N/A 12 52 80 144.0
Task 1100.1.31 Western Terminus Development N/A N/A 8 24 24 56.0
2/4/2021 Page 2 of 4

Northern Parkway, 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue Burgess & Niple, Inc.
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS - Final Design
Contract
TASK Scale No Hours/ Sr. Project Sr. Engineer 4 Engineer 3 Engineer 2 Engineer 1 GIS/Graphi Administra Intern Total
Shts Sheet Manager Engineer cs
tor
Task 1100.2 60% PS&E Submittal 8 16 16 8 48.0
Task 1100.3 95% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Development
Task 1100.4 95% PS&E Submittal 8 16 16 8 48.0
Task 1100.5 100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Development
Task 1100.6 100% PS&E Submittal 8 16 16 8 48.0
Task 1100.7 Sealed Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Development
Task 1100.9 Construction Phasing 100 60 56 216.0
Task 1100.10 Sealed PS&E Submittal 8 8 16 32.0
180 29 128 854 1026 990 1044 1024 80 120 32 5298.0
2/4/2021 Page 3 of 4

Northern Parkway, 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue Burgess & Niple, Inc.
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES
Travel
A. Local Mileage at
$ 0.56 806 miles
Subtotal Travel $ 451
Plotting
B. Exhibits at $ 0.25 - exhibits
$ -
C. Plots at $ 1.00 - plots
$ -
D. Plan Submittals
Half Size Bond Copies at $ 0.10 - Copies
Full Size Bond Copies at $ 1.00 - Copies
Subtotal Plotting $ -
Miscellaneous Expenses
C. Other $ -
Subtotal Miscellaneous Expenses $ -
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES & CONSULTANTS
$ -
$ -
TOTAL ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES $ -
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES $ 451
2/4/2021 Page 4 of 4

January 26, 2021
James Barr, PE
Unit Manager
T.Y. Lin International
60 East Rio Salado Parkway, Suite 501
Tempe, AZ 85281
SUBJECT:
Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Design Services (Revision 1)
MCDOT Northern Parkway, 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
MCDOT Project No. TT0372
MCDOT Contract No. 2021-016
Maricopa County, Arizona
Dear James:
As requested, Ethos Engineering, LLC (Ethos) is pleased to present this revised proposal
to provide professional geotechnical engineering services for the referenced project.
Included herein is our understanding of the project, our planned scope of work and an
estimate of fees to complete the work. This revision is based on comments provided by
the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) project manager.
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) is currently expanding the
existing Northern Parkway to ultimately extend from State Route 303 (SR 303L) to Grand
Avenue (US 60). This segment of the planned Northern Parkway extends along existing
Northern Avenue from 600 feet west of 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue in the Cities of El
Mirage, Glendale, and Peoria in Maricopa County, Arizona.
The Scoping Assessment (Burgess & Niple, Inc., 2019) recommended a 4-lane through
section (in the eastbound and westbound directions) to handle an increased traffic volume
projected in 2040. The existing SR 101L/Northern Avenue traffic interchange overpass
(TIOP) diamond interchange will be reconstructed as a diverging diamond interchange
(DDI). The DDI will include significant pavement reconstruction within the TIOP limits
including shifts in the alignment of the SR 101L on and off ramps. In order to construct
the DDI, the slope paving at the abutments of the twin OP structures will be removed and
retaining walls will be constructed in their place. An additional retaining wall,
approximately 700 feet in length, will be required to provide grade separation between
southbound (SB) SR 101L and the SB on-ramp. The height of this wall is not yet known
but is anticipated based on site grades to be less than about 10 to 12 feet. The DDI
configuration will improve traffic operations and throughput. Other intersection
improvements (including the addition of turn lanes) will occur at 99th Avenue, 93rd Avenue
and 91st Avenue, and roadway widening or construction is planned along 99th Avenue,
Hayward Avenue and 89th Avenue.

January 26, 2021 2
MCDOT Northern Parkway,99th Avenue to 87th Avenue - Proposed Scope and Fee
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
Our scope will be to investigate the planned roadway and structure improvements. Based
on our understanding of the project, we propose the following scope of work.
A total of 20 roadway pavement borings are proposed to address pavement in areas
where wall borings will not otherwise be drilled. The borings have been placed on
approximate 800-foot centers and as needed to adequately address all elements. We
propose to advance each boring to a depth of 5 feet or practical refusal on strongly
cemented materials or cobbles with hollow-stem auger.
Approximately 1,200 lineal feet of new retaining wall is planned consisting of two 250-long
walls in front of the existing SR 101 OP bridge abutments and one 700 foot-long wall
between SB SR 101 and the shifted southbound on-ramp alignment. The abutment walls
will be cut into the existing slope paving beneath the bridge to widen the roadway. The
wall along SR 101 will be a cut wall within the existing embankment fill needed to provide
grade separation between the mainline shoulder and the new ramp alignment. Assuming
a test boring spacing of approximately 150 feet for walls, we propose to advance a total
of six wall borings which vary from about 35 to 50 feet in depth. The boring depths are
generally based on 2 to 3 times the wall height, for cut and fill walls, respectively. The
retaining wall borings will be advanced by hollow stem auger to advance to the required
depths. The wall borings planned will be advanced from the top of the SR 101L
embankment; one within the SB HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lane and shoulder, one
from the northbound HOV lane and shoulder, and four from the mainline shoulder. The
two abutment wall borings will be inclined to the extent possible to evaluate the
embankment conditions that will be encountered for the design and construction of
proposed walls (soil nails or other). All other borings will be drilled vertical. A new
retention basin is proposed on the southwest corner of Northern Avenue and 99th Avenue.
A summary of the geotechnical exploration plan for each component is presented in Table
2.1. Ethos has identified existing structure borings for the SR 101/Northern Avenue TIOP
which will be combined with the two borings proposed by Ethos to adequately address the
abutment retaining walls. The planned boring spacings and depths are generally
consistent with MCDOT guidelines, with modification based on our existing knowledge of
the project corridor geotechnical support conditions.
Table 2.1 – Summary of Proposed Field Investigation
Depths of Estimated
No. of No. of
Investigation Proposed HSA
Existing Proposed
Type/Location Borings Footage
Borings Borings
(feet) (feet)
Retaining Walls 4 6 35-50 245
Roadway -- 20 5 100
Retention Basin -- 2 10 20
Total 4 28 -- 365

January 26, 2021 3
MCDOT Northern Parkway,99th Avenue to 87th Avenue - Proposed Scope and Fee
Our proposed scope includes the following elements:
 Permitting, layout and AZ811 location of utilities
 Test drilling for wall, pavement and storm retention elements
 Laboratory testing
 Engineering analyses for wall foundations and pavements
 Preparation of draft and final Geotechnical Investigation Report
 Preparation of draft and final Pavement Design Report
 Attendance at project meetings
Permits
We will submit for a right of way (ROW) use permits from the ADOT Central District
Construction – Goldenrod and from MCDOT. The permit applications will include our
intended boring locations, certificate of insurance, environmental clearance and traffic
control plans. No work will be performed within the ADOT or MCDOT ROW until we
have received the permits.
Test Drilling
Resilient Drilling Services, LLC (Resilient) and ACS Services, LLC (ACS) will provide
a drill rig(s) and crew(s) and Ethos will supervise the drilling of borings as summarized
in Table 2.1. The two abutment wall borings will be advanced with truck-mounted
CME 75 hollow-stem auger (HSA). These borings will be advanced as angle holes to
the extent possible to better investigate the embankment conditions in the vicinity of
the planned soil nail walls. The roadway and percolation test borings will be advanced
with either CME 45 or CME 75 truck mounted drills advancing HSA. Sampling, which
will consist of standard penetration testing (SPT) and open-end ring sampling, will be
performed at intervals of 5 feet or less within the borings. Bulk samples of cuttings will
also be obtained for select laboratory testing. We do not anticipate that groundwater
will be encountered given the location and depth of the borings. As needed, ADWR
permits will be obtained by Resilient and ACS, if groundwater is encountered.
We anticipate the six borings drilled along SR 101 near the OP abutments and
SR 101L mainline will be completed within Portland cement concrete pavement. At
these locations, we will core 10 to 12-inch diameter holes in the pavement prior to
advancing augers. Once drilled, the borings will be backfilled with cuttings. Quick-set
high early strength concrete will be used to backfill the cores at the surface.
Traffic control will be provided by Roadsafe Traffic Control Systems. We anticipate
four nights of HOV and shoulder lane closures will be needed to complete the six SR
101 wall borings. All other borings are assumed to be drilled during the day. A total
of 4 days of traffic control is anticipated to cover drilling of the remaining borings
including 3 right lane closures and 1 day as shoulder closures.
We plan to utilize the services of an off-duty police officer for the completion of up to
four borings along Northern Avenue which will be completed in the near vicinity of
traffic intersections. These services will be provided by Law Enforcement Specialists,
Inc. as a subcontractor to Ethos. We assume that a local officer with car would be
required for four days four hour each day of support.

January 26, 2021 4
MCDOT Northern Parkway,99th Avenue to 87th Avenue - Proposed Scope and Fee
Two infiltration tests and two soil borings each to 10 feet in depth will be conducted in
this proposed basin. Ethos will mobilize and demobilize a field engineer,
subcontracted technician and/or backhoe and operator, and auxiliary vehicles and
equipment to and from the site. Ethos will oversee testing of double-ring infiltrometer
test in accordance with ASTM D3385 at two locations within the basin. These tests
will be performed at the proposed bottom of the drainage basin at locations (assumed
at 5 feet) accessible with a rubber-tired backhoe. Ethos will have ACS provide the test
equipment and backhoe which will assist with seating the test equipment. It is
assumed that test pits may be left open overnight in order to conduct infiltration testing.
The excavations will be surrounded with caution tape and/or vertical panels.
Laboratory Testing
ACS will perform laboratory testing based upon the tests assigned by Ethos. ACS will
transport the samples to their laboratory for testing. Table 2.2 is an estimate of the
tests to be performed for this project.
Table 2.2 – Summary of Proposed Laboratory Testing
Estimated No. of Tests
Test Walls Roadway Percolation Total
Grain-size Analysis 8 20 4 32
Atterberg Limits 8 20 4 32
Density of Rings 4 8 -- 12
Direct Shear 4 -- -- 4
Consolidation 2 -- -- 2
Swell -- 10 -- 10
Proctor -- 10 -- 10
R-value -- 4 -- 4
pH & Resistivity 4 10 -- 14
Sulfates and Chlorides 4 10 -- 14
Analyses and Report Preparations
We will prepare a draft and final Geotechnical Investigation Report for roadways and walls
in accordance with AASHTO 6th Edition (AASHTO 2012). The report will include the
following:
 Description of the area covered by the report and existing site conditions, including
vicinity map.
 Description of the geology and topography of the area, including soil types,
drainage characteristics and estimated depth to groundwater.
 A site plan showing boring locations and a description of procedures and
equipment used in the subsurface investigation program. Field investigations will
include descriptions of the soil types, penetration test results, in situ test results.
 Results of laboratory tests and a description of test methods.
 Discussion of potential geologic hazards.
 Results and discussion of percolation testing.

January 26, 2021 5
MCDOT Northern Parkway,99th Avenue to 87th Avenue - Proposed Scope and Fee
 Recommendations for:
o Structures, including foundation types, capacities, lateral earth pressures,
and related design parameters for retaining walls, culverts, sign supports
and standards, and lighting standards.
o Roadway embankments, including material types and suitability,
foundation conditions and improvements, settlement impacts and
remediation. Roadway excavations, including material types and suitability
for use in embankments.
o Temporary and permanent cut and fill slopes, including (if warranted) slope
stability analyses for embankment fill slopes and cut slopes, and slope
stabilization designs.
o Impacts of compressible, hydro-collapsible, and/or expansive soils, if
present, and proposed mitigations.
o Erosion abatement design for permanent cut and fill slopes.
o Corrosion potential of soils on construction materials.
o Impacts on, and from, groundwater, including necessary remedial actions.
o Construction and inspection considerations.
o Special Provisions.
o Suitability of materials (borrow, aggregates, riprap, topsoil, etc.) that can
be obtained from project excavations, including source, quality, and
availability.
 Reports will also include the following items in the appendix:
o Plan view locations of field sampling/testing
o Copies of the boring logs and field/laboratory test data used for the analysis
and design.
o Summary of laboratory testing methods and tabulated results.
o As-needed retaining wall bearing resistance charts, results of slope
stability, Settle3D and MSEW.
Ethos will prepare a draft and final pavement design report that will provide a pavement
history, an evaluation of different pavement section options, pavement cost comparisons
and the recommended pavement sections.
We will also assist, as needed, with the preparation of the Project Special Provisions.
Project Design Meetings
For estimating purposes, we will plan to attend the project kickoff meeting and up to 15
internal team and monthly design progress meetings by video conference throughout the
course of the project. No in-person meetings are currently budgeted for this project.
Post-Design Services
Post-design services are not currently defined and will be addressed in a separate
proposal, if requested by MCDOT.
3.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
We will begin our work upon written notice-to-proceed (NTP) and will endeavor to
complete our work so as not to impact the overall design schedule implemented by

January 26, 2021 6
MCDOT Northern Parkway,99th Avenue to 87th Avenue - Proposed Scope and Fee
T.Y.Lin. More specifically, we will submit our field investigation plan within 10 days of NTP
and will begin our field investigation within 10 days of receipt of the environmental
clearance. We anticipate that field work will take up to 56 working days (with one to two
drill crews) to complete. Our reports will be submitted in general accordance with the
following schedule:
 Draft geotechnical report – 6 weeks after completion of field work
 Draft pavement design package – 7 weeks after completion of field work
 Final reports will be submitted approximately 2 weeks following the receipt of
review comments.
4.0 PROJECT FEES
Our services will be performed under the direction of an Arizona-registered Professional
Civil Engineer. Based on the proposed scope of work and our understanding of the
project, we propose to complete the scope of work presented above for a cost-plus fixed
fee cost of $93,012.
If there is a need for any change in the scope of services described in the proposal, please
call us immediately. Changes may require revision of the proposed fee, which will be
communicated to you upon assessment of the requested changes effect on the fee.
Our fees will be invoiced on a monthly basis not to exceed the indicated amount. If field
conditions require a modification to the scope of work developed for this proposal and may
affect either our planned project schedule or budget, we will contact you at the earliest
opportunity to discuss these conditions.
LIMITATIONS
The geotechnical services will be performed in a manner consistent with that level of care
and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the geotechnical profession practicing
in the same locality, under similar conditions and at the date the services are provided.
Our conclusions, opinions and recommendations will be based on our completed test
borings, visual observations and the review of plans prepared by others. It is possible that
conditions could vary between or beyond the data evaluated. Ethos makes no guarantee
or warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the services, communication (oral or written),
report, opinion, or instrument of service provided.
AUTHORIZATION
We will proceed upon successful negotiation and execution of the subconsultant
agreement provided by T.Y.Lin.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with
you on this project. If you have any questions or require additional information pertaining
to this proposal, we would be pleased to discuss them with you.

January 26, 2021 7
MCDOT Northern Parkway,99th Avenue to 87th Avenue - Proposed Scope and Fee
Sincerely,
ETHOS ENGINEERING LLC Reviewed by:
Keith Dahlen, PE Francisco J. Garza, PE
Principal/Senior Geotechnical Engineer Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Attachments: Estimated Staff Hours
Derivation of Cost Proposal Summary
Estimate of Direct Expenses
Drilling Quotes
Laboratory Quote
Traffic Control Quote
Off Duty Officer Quote

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm Ethos Engineering, LLC
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS - PHASE
Senior
No Design Project Engineer /
TASK Project Administrative Total
Shts Manager Engineer Designer
Engineer
$ 84.14 $ 60.10 $ 37.50 $ 29.43 $ 28.00
Task A Field Investigation
Task A-1 Field Investigation Plan n/a 4 8 12 24.0
Task A-2 Permitting, Boring Layout and Utility Clearances n/a 2 6 12 20.0
Task A-3 Subsurface Investigation n/a 4 10 82 96.0
Task B Engineering Analysis & Reports
Task B-1 Engineering Analysis_Walls and Pavement Design n/a 4 6 4 8 22.0
Task B-2 Draft & Final Geotechnical Report n/a 8 24 36 16 2 86.0
Task B-3 Draft and Final Pavement Design Report n/a 6 20 28 24 2 80.0
Task B-4 Special Provisions n/a 4 4 8.0
Task C Meetings - (15 Assumed) n/a 10 5 15.0
42 83 68 154 4 351.0

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm Ethos Engineering, LLC
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR
PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
Design Manager 42 $ 84.14 $ 3,534
Senior Project Engineer 83 $ 60.10 $ 4,988
Project Engineer 68 $ 37.50 $ 2,550
Engineer / Designer 154 $ 29.43 $ 4,532
Administrative 4 $ 28.00 $ 112
351 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost $ 15,716
Overhead 140% $ 22,002
Subtotal $ 37,718
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Travel $ 147
Plotting $ -
Miscellaneous Expenses $ -
Total Estimated Expenses $ 147
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
Resilient Drilling (Drilling) $ 7,470
ACS Services (Drilling, Percolation & Lab) $ 28,211
Roadsafe (Traffic Control) $ 14,614
Law Enforcement Specialists (Officer) $ 1,080
Total Estimated Outside Services $ 51,375
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 3,772
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $ 93,012
CONTRACT TIME 365 Calendar Days
1/26/2021
Consultant Firm Signature Date

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm Ethos Engineering, LLC
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES
Travel
A. Local Mileage at
$ 0.445 330 miles
Subtotal Travel $ 147
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES & CONSULTANTS
Resilient Drilling (Drilling) $ 7,470
ACS Services (Drilling, Percolation & Lab) $ 28,211
Roadsafe (Traffic Control) $ 14,614
Law Enforcement Specialists (Officer) $ 1,080
TOTAL ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES $ 51,375
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES $ 51,522

Mr. Keith Dahlen, P.E. January 8, 2021
Ethos Engineering, LLC
9180 S. Kyrene Rd., #104
Tempe, Arizona 85284
MCDOT – Northern Parkway & SR 101 - Geotech Drilling – Angle Auger Drill/Sample
Northern Parkway & SR 101 – Maricopa County, Arizona
Dear Mr. Dahlen,
Resilient Drilling Services, LLC (Resilient) is pleased to provide this cost estimate to perform
geotechnical drilling and sampling at the above mentioned project site.
Project Scope
Provide a CME-75HT multi-purpose rotary drill rig and 2-man crew (angle ready).
Auger drill two (2) angled (30 degrees off vert.) bores to 50-lineal feet or refusal.
Sampling at 5-foot intervals.
Pavement will be cored/patched. Cuttings will be backfilled. Any excess will be spread.
Resilient will acquire online permits if groundwater.
Client will handle traffic control and any DPS officer requirements.
Cost Estimate
QUANTITY UNITS DESCRIPTION UNIT RATE TOTAL
2 Days Job Prep/Mob/Demobilization $450.00/day $ 900.00
10 Hours Angle Auger Drill/Sample (2/50’) (est.) $205.00/hour $ 2050.00
4 Hours Access/Move/Safety/Standby (est.) $205.00/hour $ 820.00
0 Hours Additional Driller Assistant (if grouting) $60.00/hour $ 0.00
2 Days Medium Support Truck $225.00/day $ 450.00
2 Days Light Plant (as needed) $200.00/day $ 400.00
2 Each Concrete Core/Cut (estimate) $750.00/each $ 1500.00
2 Each Concrete Patch (estimated) $225.00/each $ 450.00
0 Each ADWR Online Permit – Per Section $250.00/each $ 0.00
0 L.F. Grout Abandonment $9.50/l.f. $ 0.00
2 Days Night Work Surcharge (estimated) $450.00/each $ 900.00
TOTAL $ 7,470.00
We at Resilient Drilling greatly appreciate the opportunity to provide what we believe to be some of
the best geotechnical and environmental drilling in the southwest. We understand what our clients need and
expect on their projects. We intend to exceed those expectations. Thanks again, Greg Jones

ACS Services LLC
Geotechnical Engineering, Construction Material Testing, Special Inspections
DBE - WBE - SBE
Date: January 4, 2021, Revised 1/12/21
Ethos
Attn: Keith Dahlen
9180 S Kyrene Rd # 104
Tempe, AZ 85284
Phone: 480-326-8487
Email: kdahlen@ethosengineers.com
Subject: Northern Parkway : 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
Proposal No.: 2160100-2
ACS Services LLC is pleased to present the following proposal to conduct contract drilling services for the
referenced project. Our fee estimate for this project is based on the scope of work submitted by Keith in an
email dated 01/04/2021 with revisions received in an email dated 1/12/21 from Pancho. ACS looks forward
to the opportunity of working with you. If there are any questions regarding the scope of work or this
proposal, please contact Jason Kania with ACS at 480-968-0190 (Jasonk@acsservicesllc.com).
Estimate Includes:
A. ACS will advance 26 hollow stem auger borings to depths ranging from 5 feet to 40 feet, or to auger
refusal. We anticipate that this will require 6 to 8 shifts to complete.
B. ACS will sample the subsurface soils in accordance with Client's sample schedule.
C. ACS will backfill the borings with cuttings for all borings.
D. ACS will patch the surface with non shrink grout for the 4 borings requiring concrete coring.
E. No night work is anticipated.
F. Four concrete cores are included.
G. Two double ring percolaction tests, with accompanying 10 foot HSA borings, are included. The perc
tests are anticipated to be excavated with a backhoe to approximately 4 to 5 feet down, then backfilled with
native soils once the tests are complete.
Estimate Excludes:
H. Any and all traffic control.
I. Blue staking for utility clearance.
Based upon the estimated schedule and field exploraton requirements, the estimated cost for conducting
our services is:
$28,211.02
A breakdown of this pricing is attached.
Actual Cost based on Time and Materials and unit pricing

Pricing Breakdown
Item: Geotechnical Field Exploration Services
Labor and Equipment
Description Qty Unit Rate/Unit Total
Mobe / Demobe 1 Each $250.00 $250.00
Drilling Service Auger - Per hour (less than 20 foot holes) 20 Hour $175.00 $3,500.00
Drilling Service Auger - Per foot (20 feet or deeper holes) 145 Foot $28.00 $4,060.00
Pavement Coring 4 Hour $94.13 $376.52
Pavement Patch With Concrete 4 Each $20.00 $80.00
Double Ring Percolation Test 2 Each $2,275.00 $4,550.00
Grain Size Analysis 36 Each $81.00 $2,916.00
Atterberg Limits (PI) Dry Prep 36 Each $74.75 $2,691.00
Undisturbed Ring Density/Moisture 12 Each $50.00 $600.00
Direct Shear Test 6 Each $250.00 $1,500.00
One Dimensional Consolidation Test 2 Each $145.00 $290.00
One-Dimensional Swell or Settlement Potential 10 Each $87.00 $870.00
Moisture-Density Relationship (Proctor) 10 Each $120.75 $1,207.50
Resistance R-Value of Compacted Soils 4 Each $350.00 $1,400.00
Determination of pH and Resistivity of Soil 16 Each $145.00 $2,320.00
Sulfate Content of Soil 16 Each $50.00 $800.00
Chloride Content of Soil 16 Each $50.00 $800.00
Estimated Sub Total $28,211.02
This is based on all auger drilling, no other methods have been priced here, per client request.

While ACS Services LLC strives to do work in a non invasive manner, we cannot accept liability for work
done at the request of the Customer under circumstances beyond our knowledge and/or control. Customer
shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless ACS Services LLC dba ACS Engineering Group and their
respective officers, directors, officials, agents, and employees (hereinafter referred to as “Indemnitee”) from
and against any and all claims, actions, liabilities, damages, losses, or expenses (including court costs,
attorneys’ fees, and costs of claim processing, investigation and litigation) (hereinafter referred to as
“Claims”) for bodily injury or personal injury (including death), or loss or damage to tangible or intangible
property caused, or alleged to be caused, in whole or in part during or from work performed by ACS
Services LLC.
This indemnity includes any claim or amount arising out of or recovered under the Workers’ Compensation
Law or arising out of the failure of such Customer to conform to any federal, state or local law, statute,
ordinance, rule, regulation or court decree. It is the specific intention of the parties that the Indemnitee
shall, in all instances, except for Claims arising solely from the negligent or willful acts or omissions of the
Indemnitee, be indemnified by Customer from and against any and all Claims. It is agreed that Customer
will be responsible for primary loss investigation, defense and judgment costs where this indemnification is
applicable.
These General Conditions are an integral part of this proposal and are incorporated herein.
Please contact ACS Services LLC if you have any questions.
Respectfully Submitted,
ACS Services LLC
Jason M. Kania
Drilling Operations Manager
Client acknowledges acceptance of this estimate and Terms and Conditions by signing below and
returning, faxing or emailing the signed proposal to ACS Services LLC.
Authorized Signature:
Date
Print Name:
Title:

3015 EAST ILLINI STREET
PHOENIX, AZ 85040
602-243-1218 OFFICE
602-243-3470 FAX
TO: ESTIMATING ESTIMATE
ETHOS ENGINEERING
PROJECT FIELD INVESTIGATION-MCDOT BID DATE: 1/8/2021
LOCATION NORTHERN PARKWAY 99TH AVE TO 87TH AVE DAVE TROYANEK 602-243-1218
QUOTE: 01082021PHXDT1
BID LINE DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE EXTENDED
ESTIMATED EQUIPMENT & LABOR FOR SHADOW TRUCK
OPERATION ON NORTHERN AVE ONSITE FOR UP FOR 8
1 HOURS-INCLUDES TRAVEL TIME SET UP/TEAR DOWN- DAY 4 $ 724.00 $ 2,896.00
DAYTIME (VARIOUS LOCATIONS PER SCOPE)
(SHOULDER/RIGHT LANE/CENTER LANE)
ESTIMATED EQUIPMENT FOR SB SR 101 SHOULDER
2 CLOSURE ONSITE FOR 4.5 HOURS-INCLUDES TMA- DAY 1 $ 1,566.00 $ 1,566.00
DRIVER ALL SIGNAGE-SET UP/TEAR DOWN
ESTIMATED EQUIPMENT FOR SB or NB 101
SHOULDER/HOV LANE CLOSURE ONSITE FOR 8 HOURS-
3 DAY 4 $ 2,208.00 $ 8,832.00
INCLUDES TMA-DRIVER ALL SIGNAGE-SET UP/TEAR
DOWN
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS
4 EA 22 $ 60.00 $ 1,320.00
NEEDED - PER SHEET (LOCATION)
* Sand bags & flags included. Pedestrian Barrier/Ramps, Not included or Police services If required, time will
be billed at the rates listed below.
This estimate is based on information provided to us. All equipment and labor will be invoiced using actual
quantities. Final pricing subject to change on approved traffic control plans.
EXCLUSIONS:
●MESSAGE BOARD RENTAL DEL/PICK UP IS $150 PER $ 54.00 DAY
●CITY TRAFFIC PERMIT SUBMITTAL FEE $ 35.00 EA
●ADDITIONAL PED BARRIER WALL $ 1.50 EA
●ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN RAMP $ 15.00 EA
●ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN BARRIER $ 2.00 EA
●ADDITIONAL LABOR
●1 MAN 1 TRUCK $ 55.00 HR
●2 MEN 1 TRUCK $ 90.00 HR
● SALES TAX, BOND,SPECIAL PERMITS OR ANY INCENDENTAL ITEMS UNLESS NOTED ABOVE.
*** TERMS & CONDITIONS
Net 30 days on rental & sales items on approved credit
We do not accept retention less than $10,000.00
Industry Standard Insurance will be provided as requested
Register of Contractor's licenses numbers 248999 CR-05, 253153 AE
Notification of acceptance of this quotation is required via E-mail, Contract or Purchase Orders
THIS QUOTE IS VALID FOR 60 DAYS FROM 1/8/2021
*** IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION OR CONCERNS PLEASE CONTACT ME AT
602-243-1218 or dtroyanek@roadsafetraffic.com
*** FOR PROJECT SCHEDULING PLEASE CALL DISPATCH AT 602-243-1218
Sincerely,

Dave Troyanek

-. /:) 5
LAW ENFORCEMENT
1 SPECIALISTS, INC.
January 8, 2021
Ethos Engineering
9180 S Kyrene Rd #104
Tempe, AZ 85284
To whom it may concern,
Law Enforcement Specialists can provide an off duty officer for Ethos engineering for their upcoming
needs. The price for a local officer is $65.00 per hour plus $5.00 per hour if a vehicle is requested. If DPS
is needed or requested the price is $63.00 per hour plus $13.00 per hour for the vehicle. DPS hours are
portal to portal as well. All jobs are a four hour minimum.
If you have any questions please feel free to reach out to me.
Regards,
Gus Scholz
Director of Business Development
0 - 623.825.6700 I C - 480.606.8828
gus@lesaz.com I info@lesaz.com
9299 W. Olive Ave Suite 801 Peoria, AZ 85345 Office: 623-825-6700 Fax: 623-825-6718 Email: info@lesaz.com

J2 Engineering & Environmental Design, LLC
Northern Parkway 99th Ave. to 87th Ave. Design
Drainage Analysis & Landscape Architecture
Contract No. 2021-016
February 3, 2021
Scope of Services
J2 Engineering and Environmental Design, LLC (J2) was retained by TYLin International to
perform the hydrologic/hydraulic analyses required for on-site and off-site drainage design,
water quality treatment mitigation, preparation of landscape plans, irrigation and stormwater
pollution prevention plans for the proposed Northern Parkway 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
project. The project will including the widening of Northern Parkway from the western limit at
99th Avenue, crossing the 101 with a new Divergent Diamond Interchange (DOI) and ending the
project at 87th Ave. In addition to the key stakeholder Maricopa County Department of
Transportation (MCDOT), J2 will also be working in conjunction with the City of Peoria (COP),
City of Glendale (COG) and the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT).
J2 will assist in the report preparation to document the drainage analyses preformed, attend
meets in accordance with the hours specified, and coordinate the design with TYLin, and
MCDOT.
This PROJECT will be designed to a unique combination of design standards and specifications
that are specific to Northern Parkway. No new standards are introduced, but there are a
combination of standards applied from MCDOT, ADOT, MAG, and in some cases the CITY'S
depending on the design element and/or location. The applicable design standards will be
documented in the drainage reports.
DRAINAGE DESIGN
Task 100 - Data Collection
J2 will collect available data required for the hydraulic analyses. It is anticipated that this data
will include Northern Parkway: Loop 101 to Grand Avenue, Scoping Assessment, Scoping and
Design Report, Revised December 2019, topographic mapping (provided by MCDOT), R/W and
easements, Northern Avenue As-Built drawings (MCDOT/Peoria).
It is anticipated that supplemental survey and utility locating (potholing) may be utilized to verify
existing site information. The survey and utility location will be performed by other team
members.
Task 200 - Hydrologic Analyses
Onsite Drainage
MCDOT procedures and methodologies will be utilized for the onsite drainage design. The
Rational Equation will be utilized for the hydrologic analyses. The onsite drainage will be
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Prepared: February 2021 Page 1 of 6

designed for the 10-year return interval. J2 will develop contributing area maps that document
the area, roughness coefficient, and discharge generated by each roadway parcel.
J2 will work with ADOT, MCDOT, FCDMC, Peoria, and Glendale to determine the required
water quality treatment for Northern Parkway. The storm drain facilities will ultimately discharge
into the New River.
Offsite Drainage
J2 will verify the design discharge values to be utilized for the project. The values will be based
on the recommendations from the SOR. The Peoria Storm Drain Master Plan, January, 2014
(Peoria SDMP) served as the primary basis of design. The offsite flows are based on the 100-
year 24-hour HEC-1 model developed for the Peoria ADMP. The MCDOT design return interval
is the 50-year storm event. However, in urban areas FEMA requires that the adjacent
properties not be adversely impacted during the 100-year storm event. The proposed roadway
profile mimics the existing profile of Northern Avenue. The proposed roadway has sections of
raised medians. The medians will be designed to ensure that cross drainage is not adversely
impacted. MCDOT and Peoria allow a six (6) inch overtopping depth during the 100-year storm
event. The Peoria ADMP is a regional model and site specific inflow locations will need to be
refined as part of this project. It is anticipated that sub-basins adjacent to the Northern Parkway
corridor may need to be modified to more accurately quantify inflow locations. In addition, team
members will document recent developments in the project watershed that would impact the
hydrologic analyses.
Task 300 - Hydraulic Analyses
Procedures and methodologies from MCDOT and FCDMC will be utilized for design of the
storm drain facilities. It is anticipated that J2 will utilize the StormCADD and/or SWMM
computer models for design of the storm drain system. Procedures and methodologies from the
FHWA publication entitled Urban Drainage Design Manual (HEC-22) will be utilized for design of
catch basins and median inlets.
Task 400 - Report Preparation
J2 will provide both a-Preliminary and a Final Drainage Report for this project, in accordance
with the MCDOT PDM. J2 will coordinate with MCDOT to ensure consistency between the final
drainage design and the SCOPNG DESIGN REPORT.
The drainage reports will contain an executive summary, narrative, drainage area map, and
appropriate calculations. Reference tables, calculations, computer printout and electronic files
will be in an appendix or appendices. The Preliminary Drainage Report addressing both on-site
and off-site flows will be submitted with the 60% plans. The Final Drainage Report addressing
both on-site and off-site flows will be submitted as a bound report and in electronic format.
Drainage maps and calculations will be prepared that quantify existing conditions and
demonstrate compliance with the drainage design criteria. Calculations will include, but not be
limited to, identifying quantities, direction and spread of runoff flows to culverts and channels
within and adjacent to the project for both existing and proposed conditions.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Prepared: February 2021 Page 2 of 6

Task 500 - Drainage Plan Preparation
J2 will develop drainage construction documents for the project in accordance with MCDOT
requirements. It is anticipated that three (3) submittals will be required for this project (60%,
95%, and Final). The construction documents will consist of plans, specifications, and opinions
of probable construction cost for the drainage facilities.
It is anticipated that the following sheets will be required for the project:
1. Storm Drain Plan Sheets 16 sheets
2. Storm Drain Profile Sheets 10 sheets
3. Retention Basin Plan, Coordinate Geometry, Cross Sections 2 sheets
4. Water Quality Basin Plan, Coordinate Geometry, Cross sections 2 sheets
5. Drainage Details 4 sheets
Total 34 sheets
LANDSCAPE DESIGN
Task 100 - Landscape & Irrigation Plans
J2 will develop Landscape and Irrigation construction documents for the project in accordance
with MCDOT requirements. J2 will generate a proposed plant palette and irrigation equipment
list for review with MCDOT and Stakeholders. It is anticipated that three (3) submittals will be
required for this project (60%, 95%, and Final). The construction documents will consist of
plans, specifications, and opinions of probable construction cost for the Landscape and
Irrigation facilities.
1. Landscape and Surface Materials Plans 22 sheets
2. Landscape Details 2 sheets
3. Irrigation Plans 22 sheets
4. Irrigation Details 4 sheets
50 sheets
Task 200 - Retaining Wall Aesthetics Elevations and Details
J2 will develop Retaining Wall Aesthetic construction documents for the project in accordance
with MCDOT requirements. J2 will develop up to three (3) concepts for the retaining wall
aesthetics for MCDOT and stakeholder review. Each concept will be a color rendered elevation
portraying the design and color scheme. Upon stakeholder feedback J2 will refine the retaining
wall aesthetic into a preferred alternative. The preferred alternative will be utilized as the basis
of the construction documents. It is anticipated that three (3) submittals will be required for this
project (60%, 95%, and Final). The construction documents will consist of plans, specifications,
and opinions of probable construction cost for the Landscape and Irrigation facilities.
1. Retaining Wall Aesthetic Elevations 2 sheets
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Prepared: February 2021 Page 3 of 6

2. Retaining Wall Aesthetic Details 4 sheets
6 sheets
Task 300 - Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
J2 will develop Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) construction documents for the
project in accordance with MCDOT requirements. It is anticipated that three (3) submittals will
be required for this project (60%, 95%, and Final). The construction documents will consist of
plans, specifications, and opinions of probable construction cost for the SWPPP facilities.
1. SWPPP Summary and Details 3 sheets
2. , SWPPP Plan Sheets (1" = 40' double stacked) 10 sheets
13 sheets
The following is a listing of deliverables at the different project milestones:
Meetings and Coordination:
J2 will ·atte'nd meetings and coordinate with team members in accordance with hours defined in
the man hour estimate. It is anticipated that these meetings will include the kickoff meeting,
monthly progress meetings, internal project team meetings, and comment resolution meetings.
60% Submittal'
J2 will· perform a field investigation to identify existing conditions and other issues that will
impact the,:designs for the ,elements and features discussed.
60% deliverables:
Special Provisions-8.'5" x_ 11" - Electronic Word Document and .PDF
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost -8.5" x 11" - Electronic Word Document and .PDF
Full Size - 22" x 34" and Half Size -11" x 17" Electronic Plan Sets including sheets for the
followings disciplines; Drainage, Landscape/ Irrigation, Retaining Wall, and SWPPP sheets
95% Submittal
J2 will fœrther refine .the-design concepts and address stakeholder comments from the 60%
submittal to bring the documents to a 90% level of completion.
95% deliverables:
Special Provisions-8.5'' x 11" - Electronic Word Document and .PDF
Opinion: of Probable Cost- 8.5" x 11" - Electronic Word Document and .PDF
Full Size - 22" x 34" and Half Size -11" x 17" Electronic Plan Sets including sheets for the
followings disciplines; Drainage, Landscape/ Irrigation, Retaining Wall, and SWPPP sheets
100% Submittal ·
J2 will further refine the design concepts and address stakeholder comments from the 95%
submittal to bring the documents to a 100% level of completion.
Project No.: TT0372'_, Contract No.: 2021-016
Prepared: February 2021 Page 4 of 6

100% deliverables:
Special Provisions - 8.5" x 11" - Electronic Word Document and .PDF
Opinion of Probable Cost - 8.5" x 11" - Electronic Word Document and .PDF
Full Size - 22" x 34" and Half Size - 11" x 17" Electronic Plan Sets including sheets for the
followings disciplines; Drainage, Landscape / Irrigation, Retaining Wall, and SWPPP sheets
Sealed Submittal
After receiving final approval on the 100% plans from stakeholders J2 will prepare final sealed
plans.
PS&E deliverables:
Bridge·.Aesthetic Design, SWPPP, Special Provisions and Estimates sealed by an Arizona
Register.ed Landscape .Architect. Plans: 22"x34" vellum; Special Provisions and estimates: 8 ½"
X 11".
All plansheets, reference files, special provisions and cost estimates will be prepared to
conform to the .latest MCDOT guidelines. J2 will apply MC DOT accepted QA/QC processes
and have available forreview the QA/QC documents. Upon Project completion J2 will prepare
record :CD's of all plan files and special provisions for TYLIN and MCDOT files.
Project No.: TT03,72 Contract No.: 2021-016
Prepared: February 2021 Page 5 of 6

Project Assumptions
1. Native Plant Inventory and Salvage plans have not been included in this scope of
services
2. Structural Engineering has not been included in this scope of services. Treatments to
Retaining Walls are for aesthetic treatments only.
3. GADD drawings will be in accordance with MCDOT formats and will be completed
utilizing Microstation V8.
4. This scope and fee does not include any post design efforts.
5. Aesthetic Treatments within ADOT R/W or on ADOT structures has not been included in
• .this scope of services.
6. . Environmental permitting to be performed by others
7. ,.FEMA CLOMR/LOMR permits by others
8 .. No hardscape design.bas,been included in this scope of services.
9. , Power design for irrigation controllers will be provided by others. J2 will identify
.locations for :required power.:seruices only.
1 0::Any meeting beyond what is described with the scope of services or documented on the
man hour estimate have not been included in this scope of services.
Project No.: TT0372 Contract No.: 2021-016
Prepared: February 2021 Page 6 of 6

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm: J2 Engineering &
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Environmental Design, LLC
Contract No. 2021-016
DER/VA TION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR
PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
Design Manager 148 $ 76.50 $ 11,322
Senior Project Engineer 274 $ 67.50 $ 18,495
Project Engineer 200 $ 49.25 $ 9,850
Engineer 194 $ 38.00 $ 7,372
Senior Project Landscape Architect 318 $ 68.00 $ 21,624
Project Landscape Architect 646 $ 46.94 $ 30,323
Desinger - Senior 478 $ 45.23 $ 21,620
Designer 646 $ 28.00 $ 18,088
Clerical 8 $ 27.25 $ 218
2,912 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost $ 138,912
Overhead 146.36% $ 203,312
Subtotal $ 342,224
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Travel $
Plotting $
Miscellaneous Expenses $
Total Estimated Expenses $
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
Consultant Y $
Consultant Z $
Total Estimated Outside Services $
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 34,222.36
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $ 376,446
CONTRACT TIME 1888 Calendar Days
rin esign,LLC
3/26/2013 Page 1 of 1

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design J2 Engineering & Environmental Design, LLC
PROJECT NO. TT0372
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS- PHASE
Senior
Senior
No Hours/ Design Project Project
TASK Scale Project Engineer Clerical Total
Shts Sheet Manager Engineer Landscape
Engineer
Architect
I
8.2.1 Oro.fl Fin3.J Drain:1.nc Reoort 10 16 12 10 64
8.2.t FinnlDrni11ngeRe11ort 8 10 8 6 42
8.2.3 Drninngc Calculo.lions (Onsitc & Offsih: Annlvses) 16 24 40 60 16 16 172
I
J l.U.J Dro.inJ."¢ Plan Sheet 20 16 13 18 24 36 Ī2 40 s 208
11.1..l.2 StonnDrai11Profiles 10 23 12 20 32 8 54 66 232
11. 1-1.3 Relenlion Ilasin Coordinnlc Gcometrv. Cross Sec lions 10 6 8 12 40
11.1.,,.f Drnin:11Ħ,;:Jxtails 21 12 14 18 16 20 64
11.17.1 Ulndsc:ioc&SurfaceħJnterinlPlru1s 20 22 20 60 160 60 160 440
11.17.1 L.,nJscnp.:Ĩlails 38 12 20 32 12 76
11.17.J lrrig.1lion Plans 20 22 20 60 160 60 160 440
Jl.17A [rri1rn.tionfktails 22 16 24 32 16 88
J 1.17.5 Stom1 Water Pollution Preveuti0t1 Plnns lSWPPP) 40 10 13 24 40 24 40 128
Jl.17,6 SWPPP Ixtn.ils 15 18 18 4 44
JJ.17.7 Rcloning\\'o.llEkvolions 50 30 20 30 20 100
11.17.8 Rdo..nirH! \Vall Od:iils 50 60 40 60 40 200
HAO Speci:11Provisions 32 16 32 16 100
11.50 Ou:inti1ies,mdEstim:1le 16 8 16 16 16 64
JJ.00 Proil!tt Coordin:11ion with Prim<! Consultnnl 18 12 12 12 12 66
13.21 ,{COOT }\.( lines 30 60 60 152
13.22 S1:tkdtold<!r}l.ktlinĩs 30 60 60 152
TOTALS 103 28 148 274 200 194 318 646 478 646 2912
P.tg I of 1

MakPro Services, LLC
2036 N. Gentry • Mesa, AZ 85213
Office: 480-890-1927
Email: teresa@makprosvc.com
January 13, 2021
Mr. James Barr
T.Y. Lin International
60 E. Rio Salado Parkway, Suite 501
Tempe, AZ 85281
Dear James:
MakPro Services, LLC (MakPro) is pleased to provide the following scope of work and
cost estimate for public outreach services during design of MCDOT’s Northern Parkway
Project, from 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue (MCDOT Project TT0372). Public outreach is
an important element during design of large capital projects, and provides a link
between the project and the community it impacts. Many times this small link is all that
is needed to help a project run more smoothly.
There are a variety of communication tools which can be used to establish appropriate
communication with the effected stakeholders of a project. The public outreach
activities provided as part of this cost estimate are based on the information you
provided from MCDOT’s scope of services for the project. As part of the public outreach
effort for this project, MakPro will:
• Assist with developing a strategy for one public meeting for the project;
• Assist with developing a specific strategy to engage key City of Peoria and City of
Glendale management and elected officials, or key stakeholder constituents that
need engaging;
• Participate in the public meeting and provide handout and sign-in services during
the meeting;
• Participate in up to five (5) regular coordination meetings for the project during
design;
• Coordinate as needed with MCDOT’s Public Information staff to assist with
messaging or information related to the project.
Please take a moment to review this scope of work and the following cost estimate for
public outreach services during design. If I’ve missed or misunderstood any of the
project characteristics, or if you’d like to customize this proposal in some other way,
please let me know.

Mr. James Barr, T.Y. Lin International January 13, 2021
Public Outreach Services During DESIGN – MCDOT’s Northern Parkway Project, 99th Ave to 87th Ave
Public Senior Public
Outreach Public Outreach
Task Project Outreach Coordinator Fee / Cost
Manager Coordinator Hrs (rounded)
Hrs Hrs
($45.00/hr) ($36.00/hr) ($24.40/hr)
Public Meeting Strategy
Development 7 2 $387
Outreach Strategy for Elected
Officials/Management 7 2 $387
Public Meeting (1) 6 4 8 $609
Project design progress meetings
(up to 5) 10 10 $810
Public Outreach Coordination 10 5 $630
Sub Total 40 23 8 $2,823
Overhead (148%) $4,178
Profit (10%) $700
Grand Total $7,701
The total cost for public outreach services as identified in the above cost estimate
should not exceed $7,701.00. MakPro is not responsible for any expenses related
to rental of meeting venue, or printing, postage or distribution of meeting notifications,
or printing of meeting materials. Changes of substance to this proposal during the
project may affect the final cost.
Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Should you have
questions, need additional information, or wish to customize this proposal in some other
way, please feel free to contact me at (480) 890-1927.
Sincerely,
Teresa Makinen

Revised February 2, 2021
Revised January 29, 2021
January 18, 2021
2051 W Northern Ave #100
Phoenix AZ 85021 Mr. James Barr, PE
P: 602.335.8500
Vice President
F: 602.335.8580
www.woodpatel.com Unit Manager | Project Manager
TYLIN International
60 East Rio Salado Parkway, Suite 501
Darrel E. Wood, PE, RLS Tempe, AZ 85281
Ashok C. Patel, PE, RLS, CFM
Michael T. Young, PE 480.968.8814
Thomas R. Gettings, RLS
James.barr@tylin.com
Darin L. Moore, PE, LEED GA
Jeffrey R. Minch, PE, CFM
Robert D. Gofonia, PE, RLS
Nicholas E. Brown, PE Re: Northern Parkway; 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue, TT0372
Daniel W. Matthews, PE
Ethan A. Boyle, PE Contract No. 2021-016
Frank M. Koo, PE Tribal Acquisition Support
Gabriel S. Rios, RLS Glendale, Arizona
John M. Bulka, PE
Daniel J. Cronin, PMP
James G. Taillon, CFM Dear Mr. Barr:
Joseph C. Daconta, PE, CFM, PH
Ronald F. Martinez, PE Thank you for the opportunity to revise the attached Cost Proposal and Scope of Work
John G. Ritchie, PE
that were prepared in accordance with the items requested in the February 2, 2021 TYLIN
Derek C. Nichols, PE
Steven C. McKee, PE International email.
Robert W. Dalton, PE
Brian J. Diehl, RLS
Ryan Hall, PE
Karen C. Hobbs, PE Sincerely,
Diana B. Kelly, PE
Chelsea J. Trotter, PE Wood, Patel & Associates, Inc.
Thomas R. Gettings, RLS
Vice President
TRG/jd
Attachment: Cost Proposal Summary
Y:\WP\Proposals\Survey\2021\Northern Pkwy 99th Ave to 87th Ave TT0372 Contract 2021-016 Tribal Acquisition Support Scope TYLIN Int'l J Barr
Rev 02-02-21.docx

Contract No. 2021-016
Northern Parkway; 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue, TT0372
SCOPE OF WORK
The Tohono O’odham Nation (Nation) property located south of Northern Avenue between 91st and 95th Avenues
consists of five (5) parcels fronting Northern Avenue, with three (3) differing ownership or stewardship responsibilities
and requirements. Four (4) of the parcels are held in Trust by the United States of America for and on behalf of the
Nation and is within unincorporated Maricopa County jurisdiction. One (1) of the parcels is owned by the Nation in fee
title and is within City of Glendale jurisdiction. Due to the Trust Ownership nature of the majority of Nation’s property,
more than likely typical roadway and utility right-of-way or easement conveyances will not be obtained. Based on our
understanding of previous transactions, the Nation has granted various types of Intergovernmental Agreements and
License Agreements instead. For the most part, these types of agreements do not require Department of the Interior
involvement at the Federal level.
There are multiple layers of governance on the Nation’s property. The Nation, headquartered in Sells Arizona, has the
ultimate authority to make final decisions. The property is part of and falls under the jurisdiction of the San Lucy District
(District), headquartered near Gila Bend Arizona. The Nation has entrusted the Tohono O’odham Gaming Enterprise
(Enterprise), headquartered in Sahuarita and Glendale Arizona, to oversee the planning and development of the
majority of the Nation’s property. Each of these entities have their own planning, development and legal teams that will
have some level of involvement with the review and approval of the Northern Parkway Project.
Progress Meetings
WOODPATEL will attend design team meetings to provide an understanding of the history of the Nation’s property and
existing development on their five (5) parcels, and offer guidance for communication. It is our understanding the design
for the Northern Parkway Project will have an eighteen (18) month duration. WOODPATEL anticipates attending up to
six (6) design team meetings for the design duration. We anticipate conveying design team meeting information to the
Enterprise on a monthly basis (anticipate up to eighteen (18) meetings), and to the Nation and District on an every-
other month basis (anticipate up to nine (9) meetings). We will communicate responses from the meetings with the
Nation’s entities to the Client. It is our understanding the local Design Team meetings will be conducted virtually. We
anticipate travelling to Sells, Gila Bend and Sahuarita for meetings with the Nation’s entities.
Title Commitments
As directed by Client, WOODPATEL will utilize a title company recommended by Maricopa County as a sub-consultant
to prepare title reports for up to twenty-eight (28) parcels of land within the Northern Parkway Project limits. The reports
will be provided to Client. Any reports prepared for the Nation’s property will cover the period prior to the land being
converted to Trust. This proposal does not include research with Bureau of Indian Affairs or other Tribal Agencies. It is
our understanding that plotting the encumbrances of record will be performed by others.
Legal Descriptions
As directed by Client, WOODPATEL will prepare up to 10 legal descriptions for various purposes associated with the
Northern Parkway Project. The legals will be prepared in accordance with the current Arizona Boundary Survey
Minimum Standards and will be sealed by an Arizona Registered Land Surveyor and include an 8” x 11” graphical
exhibit. It is our understanding any survey field work associated with the legals will be performed by others and the
results provided to WOODPATEL.

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Wood, Patel & Associates, Inc.
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR
PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
Project Manager 379 $ 73.28 $ 27,773
Survey Tech 116 $ 33.19 $ 3,850
Project Coordinator 105 $ 37.30 $ 3,917
- $ -
- $ -
- $ -
- $ -
- $ -
600 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost $ 35,540
Overhead 158% $ 56,153
Subtotal $ 91,693
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Travel $ 3,276
Plotting $ -
Miscellaneous Expenses $ -
Total Estimated Expenses $ 3,276
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
Title Company $ 56,000
None $ -
Total Estimated Outside Services $ 56,000
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 9,169.32
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $ 160,139
CONTRACT TIME Calendar Days
1/29/2021
Consultant Firm Signature Date
3/26/2013 Page 1 of 1

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Wood, Patel & Associates, Inc.
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS - PHASE
No Hours/ Project Survey Project
TASK Scale Total
Shts Sheet Manager Tech Coordinator
Meetings
Design Team Meetings 24 8 32.0
Nation Meetings 297 36 54 387.0
Title Reports 28 28 56.0
Legal Descriptions 30 80 15 125.0
#
379 116 105 600.0
3/26/2013 Page 1 of 1

Revision #1
February 1, 2021
Mr. James Barr, PE
Vice President – Unit Manager
T.Y. Lin International
60 E. Rio Salado Pkwy, #501
Tempe, AZ 85281
Subject: Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue, TT0372
Traffic Signal, Roadway Lighting and ITS Design Scope and Fee
Dear Mr. Barr:
Y2K Engineering, LLC. appreciates the opportunity to submit our proposal for design services for
the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) managed and roadway
improvement project on Northern Parkway between 87th and 99th Avenues. Our fee to provide
services is based on discussions with you and the scope of work enclosed.
We look forward to the successful completion of this project and working with the T.Y. Lin
International team.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (480) 696-1701.
Sincerely,
Y2K Engineering, LLC.
Yung Koprowski, PE, PTOE
Principal
Exhibit A: Scope of Work
Exhibit B: Derivation of Fee
cc: PFile
1921 S. Alma School Rd, Ste 204 \ Mesa, AZ 85210 480.696.1701 info@y2keng.com

Mr. James Barr, PE
February 1, 2021
Page 2 of 10
EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF WORK (SOW)
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue
Y2K Engineering, LLC. shall herein be referred to as the Designer and the Maricopa County
Department of Transportation shall herein be referred to as MCDOT.
Project Overview:
Project Location
The project is located along Northern Parkway between 99th Avenue and 87th Avenue including
the Loop 101 traffic interchange within ADOT’s right-of-way and access control. The project is
also within Maricopa County, the Cities of Glendale and Peoria, and the Tohono O’Odham Nation
controlled areas. Improvements along Hayward Avenue, 99th Avenue, 91st Avenue, and 89th
Avenue are also included.
Project Background
The Northern Parkway segment between 99th Avenue and 87th Avenue is part of the overall
12.5-mile Northern Parkway regional west to east connector from SR 303L to US 60 (Grand
Avenue). The Northern Parkway Overall Program is a collaboration of multiple agencies including
Maricopa County, Luke Air Force Base, MAG, ADOT, FCDMC, and the Cities of Glendale, Peoria,
and El Mirage. This project will improve the area near the SR 101L and ultimately to additional
planned improvements along Northern Parkway to the west and east.
Project Purpose
The purpose of this project is to develop federally biddable construction contract documents
(plans, specifications, estimates and other required technical reports) in accordance with the
Federal Highway Administration standards to obtain funding and advertise the project for
construction. The scope of work presented herein is based on the information supplied by
MCDOT in the Scope of Services for the design of Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th
Avenue. The Derivation of Cost is provided in Exhibit B.
1. Project Tasks
1.1. Task 1 - Design Kick-Off Meeting & Site Review
The prime consultant will setup a kickoff meeting. The Designer will attend this meeting and
attendance will be limited to the senior project engineer.
The Designer will visit the project site and collect data to include existing lane configurations
and traffic control devices within the project area. The goal of this data collection effort is to
obtain an understanding of existing conditions, including utilities, and observe how the
proposed improvements will interact with the existing environment. Design consultant will
review relevant as-built information as provided by MCDOT and the adjacent City’s. It is
assumed that the Cities of Glendale and Peoria will provide as-built drawings of the existing
conditions within the project limits.

Mr. James Barr, PE
February 1, 2021
Page 3 of 10
Comment Resolution
Comments provided by the City and any other design team members will be compiled after
the 60%, 95% and 100% submittals. A comment matrix will be prepared by the Prime with
responses to each written comment provided on the submittal. These comments will be
discussed during a comment resolution meeting. Three (3) comment resolution meetings are
assumed to be held at MCDOT.
Progress Meetings
It is assumed that there will be twenty (20) progress meetings in addition to the kickoff and
comment resolution meetings.
2.1. Task 2 - Data Collection
Y2K will review relevant as-built information as provided by MCDOT and the Cities of Peoria
and Glendale.
Base Plans Preparation
The Prime consultant shall obtain topographic survey of the project area and prepare base
plans in electronic format of the project corridor including roadway geometrics, existing
roadway signing, existing pavement marking, edge of pavement, existing structures (e.g.
drainage features) and existing utilities for use by the Designers.
General survey tasks will include establishing horizontal and vertical control for the existing
alignments and preparing a topographic and right-of-way base map. The survey limits will
encompass a minimum of 500 feet in either direction from the end of the project limits.
3.1. Task 3 – Traffic Design Plans, Estimate and Special Provisions
Traffic Signal Design
Prime will develop traffic signal plans at the intersections of:
• Northern Avenue/99th Avenue
• Northern Avenue/98th Avenue
The traffic signal plans will show the location and layout of the proposed traffic signal control
equipment at the intersection and will include the proposed traffic signal pole locations,
signal heads, vehicle detection, pre-emption equipment, pole and conductor information,
crosswalk striping, and associated underground equipment. The traffic signal plans will follow
City of Peoria design and sheet criteria. Plan view will be laid out at 1:20 scale. Each traffic
signal plan set will include:

Mr. James Barr, PE
February 1, 2021
Page 4 of 10
A. Coversheet (2 Sheets)
a. Name of project and location
b. Name, address, registration number, and seal of the Registered Professional
Engineer
c. Vicinity Map
d. Approval Block
e. Sheet Index
f. Traffic Signal Notes (refer to the Peoria Engineering Standards)
B. Layout Sheet (2 Sheets)
a. Plan view of the intersection. This should reflect the new traffic signal equipment as
well as the civil improvements and all striping. Clearly show and dimension
ROW. Show all utilities.
b. Construction Notes.
c. Pull Box Schedule. Identify all pull boxes, existing or proposed, by type and location.
i. For new signal poles, the City uses #7 pull boxes with extension.
ii. Pull box wiring is to be per Detail PE-087.
d. Fiber Splice Detail
e. Detail of the Illuminated Street Name Signs
C. Schedule Sheet (2 Sheets)
a. Equipment Schedule
b. Equipment Notes
c. Conductor Schedule:
D. ITS Sheet (2 Sheets)
a. ITS Splicing Diagram
b. Single-Line Diagram, Service Panel Schedule (For Building Permit Submittal)
Oversight & Coordination
Y2K Design team will coordinate with other team members such as Aztec Engineering and
Burgess & Niple Inc. to make sure that the designs are consistent and meet the needs of the
City of Peoria. Y2K has specific experience with the City including updating their standard
traffic signal drawings over the past six months.
Special Provisions/Construction Cost Estimate
Y2K Design team will prepare a construction cost estimate for the 60%, 95% and 100% plan
submittals of the traffic signal, roadway lighting and ITS design construction plans. In addition,
Y2K will prepare special provisions in order to provide City of Peoria approved equipment for
the traffic signal design.

Mr. James Barr, PE
February 1, 2021
Page 5 of 10
Comment Resolution
Y2K Design team will prepare detailed responses to comments made on the 60%, 95% and
100% design submittals. Staff will also be made available to attend comment resolution
meetings and discuss the comment responses.
Traffic Signal Clearance Interval Memo
Per City of Peoria guidelines, Y2K’s design team will prepare a traffic signal clearance memo
that calculates the yellow change interval, red clearance interval and pedestrian clearance
timing. All calculations will be based on the City of Peoria’s, Traffic Signal Clearance Policy
published in April 2020.
MCDOT Checklists and Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
Design team will QA/QC each discipline before any submittal to the project team, MCDOT or
any of the associated municipalities. The Prime will follow the internal procedures established
by the Design firm. In addition, Y2K will complete relevant MCDOT checklists as required in
the MCDOT Project Development Manual.
3.2. Roadway Lighting Design
Y2K Design team will develop a roadway lighting design, lighting analysis report and other
design elements necessary to design streetlighting on Northern Parkway between 87th
Avenue and 99th Avenue. The design will conform to City of Peoria criteria throughout the
project corridor with the exception of the ADOT controlled right of way near the Loop 101.
Roadway Lighting Analysis
Y2K Designer team will conduct an intersection roadway lighting analysis in conjunction with
the new overhead roadway lighting installed within the project limits. It is expected that this
work will be completed in the AGI-32 software platform. Photometric analysis results
(illumination levels) will be displayed for the average, maximum, minimum and
average/minimum according to IESNA RP-8-00.
The intersection lighting analysis will display the photometric results on a plan set sheet at a
1:40 scale in the appendix of the lighting analysis report.
ADOT Lighting Design
Roadway lighting design plans will be created for the ADOT controlled area on Northern
Parkway. The following items are expected to be a part of the ADOT lighting design:
• Lighting plans will be prepared at a scale of 1” equals 50 feet, showing existing and
proposed poles, luminaire, conduit and pull boxes.
• An underdeck lighting plan will be developed for the underpass lighting which
illuminates Northern Parkway under the Loop 101 freeway.

Mr. James Barr, PE
February 1, 2021
Page 6 of 10
• Pole/Luminaire Schedule – Pole/Luminaire schedule sheets detailing the type of
lighting poles and luminaires to be used on the project will be prepared. This pole
schedule will be part of the lighting plan sheets.
• Conductor Schedule – Conductor schedule sheets will be prepared and added to the
lighting plan set that will identify the conductors for the different lighting circuits.
• Detail Sheets – Y2K will prepare detail sheets as needed for the lighting portion of the
project.
• Standard Drawings – Applicable ADOT standard drawings of roadway lighting details
will be referenced in the plan set.
• Specifications – ADOT specifications and standards for highway lighting will be
referenced for this project.
• Voltage Drop/Load Calculations – If necessary, Y2K will develop load calculations for
the roadway lighting to be used in preparing a service request letters for the ADOT
load center that is expected to be metered. Y2K will prepare the service change
request letter for ADOT’s signature and submittal to SRP.
City of Peoria Lighting Design
Designer will develop roadway lighting plans on Northern Parkway based on the new, wider
cross-section which will cause removal of the existing streetlight system. The roadway lighting
plans will show the location and layout of the proposed roadway lighting equipment. Plans will
include the proposed light pole locations, luminaires, sidewalk, face of curb, right of way line and
existing underground and overhead utilities. The roadway lighting plan view sheets will be laid
out at 1:40 scale.
The roadway lighting plan set will include:
• Roadway Lighting General Notes • Special Provisions
• Roadway Lighting Plans • Cost Estimate
• Roadway Lighting Details
Designer will coordinate new roadway lighting system with SRP who will provide power for the
new streetlight system.
Interconnect Design
Designer will provide design plans for a new ITS system throughout the project limits to current
City of Peoria, Glendale and ADOT standards. The proposed ITS communications infrastructure
parallel to the new Northern Parkway was developed in consultation with ADOT both cities.
Proposed improvements are considered in the MAG Northern Parkway ITS Infrastructure Needs
Assessment Study from December 2018.
The proposed improvements will provide three 3-inch conduits with 144 strand Single Mode
Fiber Optic (SMFO) cable along both the north and south sides of Northern Parkway from 99th
Avenue to the east limit of the Loop 101 interchange carrying the FMS concept established by
the MAG Northern Parkway ITS Infrastructure Needs Assessment Study.

Mr. James Barr, PE
February 1, 2021
Page 7 of 10
The City of Peoria will be provided with a quad duct of four 1 ¼ inch conduits from just east of
the Loop 101 interchange to the project limits at 87th Avenue along the north side of the street
with 96-strand SMFO cable. This ITS fiber backbone will eventually connect east to US 60 under
a future project. This trunk line will connect to each Peoria traffic signal along the route using a
12-strand SMFO branch and will be located along the north side of Northern Avenue. The quad
ducts will allow additional users, such as the City of Glendale or ADOT, through allocation of the
remaining unused ducts. The north side system will also connect to the existing City of Peoria
fiber co-residing with the ADOT FMS network along the west side of the southbound off-ramp to
re-establish the redundant network that presently exists.
At Loop 101, the current design concept avoids impacts to the ADOT No. 9 vault on the northwest
corner, but if during final design it is found to be impacted, the designer will need to formulate a
strategy to accommodate relocation and reconnections while maintaining the FMS system and
associated communications networks in operation. The existing branches serving the cities of
Peoria and Glendale extensions will be re-established with new No. 9 splice vaults outside of the
widened area of Northern Avenue.
The Peoria Unified School District (PUSD) 128 strand SMFO fiber will be re-established with a new
separate quad duct system with separate boxes. The system will be constructed on the east side
of 89th Avenue, south of Northern Avenue. It will continue that alignment as it crosses Northern
Avenue. The system will then parallel Northern Avenue to the north between 89th and 87th
Avenues. The system will then be constructed on the west side of 87th Avenue north of Northern
Avenue. The designer will need to develop a strategy with PUSD to determine how to maintain
service during construction.
Fiber splicing diagrams will also be required at each signalized intersection within the project
limits. The following sheets are expected to be a part of the design:
• Cities of Peoria/Glendale General Notes, Details and Schedules – 4 Sheets
• Cities of Peoria/Glendale ITS Plan View Sheets – 9 Sheets
• Fiber Splice Diagrams, 5 signalized intersections – 5 Sheets
• ADOT ITS General Notes, Details and Schedules – 2 Sheets
• ADOT Plan View ITS Sheets – 2 Sheets
Project Administration
The Y2K Design team will confer with the Prime, MCDOT and the Cities on a regular basis via
teleconference to review the project progress and solicit directions. In addition, meeting minutes
will be completed and published by the Prime and will include issues identified and action items.
Post-Design/Construction Administration
Post design services and construction administration are not expected to be a part of this project
contract.

Mr. James Barr, PE
February 1, 2021
Page 8 of 10
Record Drawings
Record drawings are not expected to be a part of this project contract.
Deliverables
The following items will be delivered to MCDOT and the project team:
60% Plans
• 1 electronic plan set in portable document format (PDF)
• 1 electronic copy of the Construction Cost Estimate in Microsoft (MS) Excel format
95% Plans
• 1 electronic plan set in portable document format (PDF)
• 1 electronic copy of the Construction Cost Estimate in Microsoft (MS) Excel format
100% Plans
• 1 electronic plan set in portable document format (PDF)
• 1 electronic copy of the Construction Cost Estimate in Microsoft (MS) Excel format
Schedule
Prime and Design team will begin work immediately on notice to proceed from MCDOT.
Assumptions and Exceptions:
The following assumptions were used in preparing this scope of services and fee proposal:
a. Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) design is not included in this scope of work.
b. Environmental permitting and/or clearances are not included in this scope of
work.
c. Traffic counts and traffic analysis are not included in this scope of work.
d. MCDOT and/or the City of Peoria/City of Glendale will provide existing as-builts
within the project limits.
e. Prime will coordinate and provide an electronic base plan and existing topography
of the project corridor.
f. There will be three plan submittals.
g. All plan submittals will be in electronic PDF format. No costs for printing or
shipping of submittals are included in this proposal.
h. Utility coordination will be completed by the prime consultant.
i. Any permits are the responsibility of the City or MCDOT.
j. Bidding and negotiations meetings and evaluation of subcontractor proposals
are not in this scope of services.
k. No utility depth measurements are included in this proposal.
l. No traffic control is included with the survey work.
m. Any items not specifically included within the scope of this proposal are
excluded. If additional items are added to the contract, they will be performed in
accordance with Y2K’s standard rates.

Mr. James Barr, PE
February 1, 2021
Page 9 of 10
Payments:
Designer shall invoice the Prime monthly based on the derivation of fee schedule provided in
Exhibit B.

Mr. James Barr, PE
February 1, 2021
Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT B – DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 87th Avenue

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm: Y2K Engineering LLC
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR
PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
Project Principal - $ 63.00 $ -
Design Manager - $ -
Senior Project Engineer 616 $ 58.00 $ 35,728
Project Engineer 240 $ 41.50 $ 9,960
Senior Designer 758 $ 38.00 $ 28,804
Technician - $ -
Administrative 24 $ 24.00 $ 576
Clerical - $ -
1,638 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost $ 75,068
Overhead % 179.70% $ 134,897
Subtotal $ 209,965
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Travel $
Plotting $
Miscellaneous Expenses $ -
Total Estimated Expenses $ -
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
$ -
$ -
Total Estimated Outside Services $ -
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 20,996.52
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $ 230,962
CONTRACT TIME Calendar Days
2/1/2021
Consultant Firm Signature Date
Page 1 of 3

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm: Y2K Engineering LLC
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATED STAFF HOURS - PHASE
Senior
TASK Scale No Hours/ Project Design Project Project Senior Technician Administra Clerical Total
Shts Sheet Principal Manager Engineer Designer tive
Engineer
Meetings
Project Kickoff Meeting 3 3.0
Field Review 4 4 8.0
Comment Resolution Meetings (3) 9 9.0
Monthly Meetings (Assume 20 to be held in Peoria or at MCDOT) 40 16 56.0
Public Meeting 4 4.0
Traffic Signal Design
Northern Ave/99th Ave 3 30 22 18 50 90.0
Northern Ave/98th Ave 3 30 22 18 50 90.0
Traffic Signal Cover Sheets 2 10 4 16 20.0
Northern Ave/93rd Ave (Oversight & Coordination) 10 10.0
Northern Ave/91st Ave (Oversight & Coordination) 10 10.0
Special Provisions / Cost Estimate 24 8 12 44.0
Comment Resolution (3 Responses) 10 4 4 18.0
Traffic Signal Clearance Interval Memo 24 6 30.0
MCDOT Checklists and QAQC 20 8 28.0
Roadway Lighting Design
Peoria General Notes, Details, Pole Schedules 8 18 40 20 80 140.0
Peoria Plan View Lighting Sheets 6 26 42 24 88 154.0
ADOT General Notes, Details, Schedules 7 23 52 20 92 164.0
ADOT Plan View Lighting Sheets 3 24 24 18 30 72.0
Lighting Analysis 28 60 88.0
Special Provisions / Cost Estimate 24 8 12 44.0
MCDOT Checklists and QAQC 20 8 28.0
ITS
Peoria/Glendale General Notes, Details, Schedules 4 22 28 16 44 88.0
Peoria/Glendale Plan View ITS Sheets 9 22 58 28 114 200.0
Fiber Splice Diagrams 5 11 22 14 20 56.0
ADOT General Notes, Details, Schedules 2 22 14 10 20 44.0
ADOT Plan View ITS Sheets 2 22 14 10 20 44.0
Special Provisions / Cost Estimate 24 8 12 44.0
MCDOT Checklists and QAQC 20 8 28.0
Monthly Project Administaration 24 24.0
#
54 30 616 240 758 24 1638.0
Page 2 of 3

Northern Parkway: 99th Ave to 87th Ave Design Engineering Firm: Y2K Engineering LLC
PROJECT NO. TT0372 Contract No. 2021-016
ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES
Travel
A. Local Mileage at
$ - miles
Subtotal Travel $ -
Plotting
B. Exhibits at exhibits
C. Plots at plots
$ -
D. Plan Submittals
Half Size Bond Copies at Copies
Full Size Bond Copies at Copies
Subtotal Plotting $ -
Miscellaneous Expenses
C. Other $ -
Subtotal Miscellaneous Expenses $ -
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES & CONSULTANTS
$ -
$ -
TOTAL ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES $ -
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES $ -
Page 3 of 3