PZ-3 Z2018124 BOS REPORT PART 1.PDF

Report to the Board of Supervisors
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Board Hearing Date: June 26, 2019 (Cont. from 6/12/19)
Case #/Title: Z2018124 – Laborde Property
Supervisor District: 2
Applicant/Owner: Karen Nabity / Lucie E. Laborde Living Trust
Request: Zone change from Rural-190 to Rural-43
Site Location: Approx. 300’ south of southeast corner of 144th St. and
Cavedale Dr. in the Rio Verde area
Site Size: Approx. 2.5 acres
County Island Status: No
Additional
Comments: There are no outstanding concerns from reviewing agencies.
The request is in compliance with the Rio Verde Foothills Area
Plan which calls for Rural Densities (0 – 1 d.u./ac.).
This case was presented at the March 13, 2019 Board of
Supervisors hearing and received an indefinite continuance
to allow the applicant additional time to work out concerns
with the neighbors and area residents. Staff has not received
an executed access maintenance agreement with the
adjacent neighbor located to the west. Per discussion with
the applicant the maintenance agreement was submitted to
the neighbor, but has not been signed. A recorded deed
restriction prohibiting further land division has also not been
submitted by the applicant.
Since the 6/12/19 BOS hearing, two owners changed
registered opposition to support. Staff received additional
letters/e-mail in support of the zone change request. To date
staff has received a total of 8 property owners in opposition
and 48 property owners in support.
Staff has calculated the support and opposition received,
and notes that a Super Majority Vote has been triggered. The
trigger is when 20% or more of property owners within a 300’
radius of the subject site, by number and area register
opposition to the case. The property to the south is owned by
Maricopa County and is excluded from the super-majority
June 26, 2019
Z2018124
Page 1 of 2

calculation. The opposition received accounts for 4 parcels
(2 property owners) with an area of 438,307 sq. ft.
The calculations for LaBorde Property are as follows:
100% opposed parcel acreage within 300’ buffer
100% opposed parcel numbers within 300’ buffer
Commission
Recommendation: On 1/17/19, the Commission voted 9 – 0 to recommend
approval of Z2018124 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘c’:
a. Development of the site shall be in general conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Laborde Property Narrative”, consisting of 2 pages, undated, and
stamped received November 7, 2018, except as modified by the following
conditions.
b. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for
initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County
Zoning Ordinance.
c. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows
the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on
the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply
with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date
of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to
the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed
on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there
would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date
of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change
enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone
Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the
property as if the Zone Change had never been granted.
Presented by: Rachel Applegate, Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager
Attachments: 1/17/19 P&Z Packet (20 pages)
1/17/19 P&Z Handout (24 pages)
3/13/19 BOS Attachment Additional Letters of Support and Opposition (21 pages)
Super-Majority Map (1 page)
Additional Letters of Support and Opposition received after 3/13/19 BOS (28 pages)
1/17/19 Draft Excerpt of PZ Minutes (2 pages)
6/12/19 BOS Handout memo (29 pages)
June 26, 2019
Z2018124
Page 2 of 2

Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Case: Z2018124 – Laborde Property
Hearing Date: January 17, 2019
Supervisor District: 2
Applicant: Karen Nabity
Owner: Lucie E. Laborde Living Trust / Lucie Laborde
Request: Zone change from Rural-190 to Rural-43
Site Location: Approx. 300’ south of southeast corner of 144th St. and Cavedale Dr. in the
Rio Verde area
Site Size: Approx. 2.5 acres
Density: 0.4 du/ac
County Island: No
County Plan: Rio Verde Foothills Area Plan – Rural Densities (0 – 1 d.u./ac.)
Municipal Plan: N/A
Municipal Comments: None received to date
Support/Opposition: Five (5) emailed letters of opposition
Recommendations: Approve with conditions
Z2018124
Page 1 of 5

Project Summary:
1. This request is for a zone change from Rural-190 to Rural-43 of 2.5 acres located
approximately 300’ south of the southeast corner of 144th Street and Cavedale Dr. in the
Rio Verde area. The applicant proposes to develop the site with a single-family residence
as represented in the zoning exhibit and narrative submitted in the application. Per the
standards of the Rural-190 district, the subject site is required to have a minimum of approx.
4.36 acres for single-family development. The applicant does not propose to waive any of
the base standards of the proposed Rural-43 district.
2. The subject site, APN 219-39-032A, consists of 2.5 ac. of currently undeveloped native land.
The site was created in 2001 through a lot combinination of former parcels 219-39-031 (0.04
ac.) and 219-39-032 (2.46 ac.), which were created in 1986 through a lot split from an
unknown larger parcel. The site is located on the border of a large section of sporadically
developed Rural-190 zoned property that extends from 144th Street on the west to 152nd
Street on the east, and Rio Verde Drive on the north to the Jomax Road alignment on the
south. The area south of the Jomax Road alignment is the McDowell Mountain Regional
Park. The subject site abuts the park. The area’s zoning is shown in the zoning map below.
Figure 1. Area Zoning Map
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use:
3. On-site: Rural-190/ natural desert
North: Rural-190/ natural desert
South: Rural-190/ natural desert
East: Rural-43/ natural desert
West: Rural-190/ natural desert
Z2018124
Page 2 of 5

Utilities and Services:
4. Water: Well
Wastewater: On-site septic
School District: Cave Creek Unified School District
Fire: Rio Verde Fire District
Right-of-Way:
5. The following table includes existing and proposed half-width right-of-way and the future
classification based upon the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)
Major Streets and Routes Plan.
Street Name Half-width Existing R/W Half-width Proposed R/W Future Classification
144th Street None None Major Collector 40’ half-
width dedication to be
required
Jomax Road None None Major Collector 40’ half-
width reserve to be
required
Adopted Plan:
6. Rio Verde Foothills Area Plan: designates the subject site as Rural Densities (0 -1 d.u./ac.)
The area between the section line roads of 144th Street, 152nd Street, Rio Verde Drive, and
the Jomax Road alignment was originally zoned Rural-190, in contrast to the surrounding
Rural-43 zoning, to establish an area for larger lot development geared towards horse
property agricultural/residential use. However, the Rio Verde Foothills Area Plan does not
necessarily reflect this density designation and permits residential development of up to 1
du/ac. The proposed rezone complies with the Area Plan designation for the site.
Public Participation Summary:
7. The applicant complied with the requirements for posting the property with the public
hearing dates. Staff sent notification cards to all property owners within 300’ of the subject
site including all properties within the subject site regarding the request. As of the writing of
this report staff has received five (5) emailed letters of opposition to the request from
neighboring property owners. Opposition to the request focuses on the possible increase in
densities from 1:5 du/ac district to 1:1 du/ac and increased traffic on 144th Street that the
proposed rezone would allow. The letters are attached to this report.
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies:
8. County reviewing agencies have no objection to the proposed rezone. At the time of
development, the applicant will have to dedicate right-of-way for the section line street of
144th Street if the applicant does not seek a right-of-way reduction waiver from the
Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT). MCDOT does not request right-
of-way dedications with rezone applications. It should be noted that although a right-of-
way dedication for Jomax Road will not be required a zoning setback will be required unless
a right-of-way reduction waiver is granted.
Z2018124
Page 3 of 5

Staff Analysis:
9. The proposed rezone is a result of the applicant wanting to develop the site with a single-
family residence where one is not permitted under the current zoning classification due to
the site’s lot area. The proposed development will be located in the middle of the
property, which will hamper any future division of the site into another developable site.
10. The size of the subject site is a result of poor lot splitting in the 1980’s, which created lots
that were too small for development in the Rural-190 district. Subsequent to the lot split, a
previous owner attempted to assemble two parcels into a single lot that closer met the
requirements of the district, but was still approximately half the required size.
11. Although the area where the site is located is a part of a larger area zoned Rural-190, the
proposed rezone complies with the future land use designation of the Rio Verde Foothills
Area Plan. As the property is located adjacent to Rural-43 zoned property, the rezone
would not constitute a spot zone but would be an extension of the area’s Rural-43 zoned
lands. County reviewing agencies have no objection to the proposed rezone.
Recommendation:
12. For the reasons outlined in this report, staff recommends the Commission motion for
Approval of Z2018124, subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘c’.
a. Development of the site shall be in general conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Laborde Property Narrative”, consisting of 2 pages, undated, and stamped
received November 7, 2018, except as modified by the following conditions.
b. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating
a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance.
c. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows
the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the
date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with
any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of
application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the
failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the
date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would
be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of
application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change
enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change
is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property
as if the Zone Change had never been granted.
Presented by: Derek Scheerer, Planner
Reviewed by: Matt Holm, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor
Attachments: Case Map (1 page)
Vicinity Map (1 page)
Zoning Exhibit (1 page)
Narrative Report (2 pages)
MCESD comments (1 page)
Z2018124
Page 4 of 5

Engineer Review comments (1 page)
Letters of Opposition (8 pages)
Enclosures: N/A
Z2018124
Page 5 of 5

ONE
MARICOPA COUNTY STOP
SHOP
4:•-1 *-, Ab -4 itsit: -..v(,
.4:4. ..._ ... . 4_r „I.. , ,. . -. A * tt. 1 4 ..... •
airtw - . • i .. 4 P. 4 . .
- A i ocimamopmw - . .4.• -, ,
6 L 1 7,1
N •
1 .4, s- ..„. a, 4fiktirtAtap 1/44,474IWI 4i
'6 4 • ir k 1 , v
III A. .
- N ., , • .. % t lirai -,,,. .. ' I , 41bt rt: k
•
- • 4 tiPl_ ,,.,,,,..-,,iiy r N. a -
•
to,
- NIF Ai 2 - •
-II ' i/ o ' ' iii11111 f . lik I. I.!
- A IP-, 7 41rtal.' A Igi • ' . t ;),,4 .., ,k • t
I , . 1 ...r.,* *. oi. lb lio Ft .• i *
I - 4ra * AP . 7 '''-
. '''' %
-. s- I04 04.;1, 4k.*Ttrb ,
• - li 'i. gil 'el ii —it'
_ ) , a 219-3-, L_A9 t032A 4 . 3 I ' ''''gr tee, 7; ii l° 1
.ti '1 ,- , Ili IN'
. --. _ • Y 11.411/1
i "1i- ......
,4, t
. ,
I lie 4
I
4 • 10 , a - t ' --...-r -- • ' *lb -tr
_4 orr. .- ..
, a
, •
_Of .
- . fit -ti.. .
. , __.. - ,
' .0 .
' 7 . e , . • - i !
....., , , 4--onar-. lc . III
. . 1.
. ..i .., .. ,
*
Application Name: LaBorde Property
Legal Description
T05N RO6E 032,
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
602 299 5222
KAREN NABITY KARENNABITY@GMAIL COM
Case Address Parcel Primary: 219-39-032A Z2018124
26623 N 144TH St
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85262
Generated January 3, 2019 14:26 PM Gross Acres: 2.5 approx. Map scale 1:821
Supervisor District No. 2
CHANGE ZONING FROM RU-190 TO RU-43 SO WE MAY BUILD ONE HOME
WE
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ

ONE
MARICOPA COUNTY STOP
SHOP
. , -,An , L. ,iicr.g.iri*W.1, t !RI' '‘‘-'' I-• .. , . V, t, ^-« 1 . ( • . ^ t I. '...- I- r 1 s_ .
- t . ,..!ti•-• 1 - = . ' '
-7S 'I. I.
Z ',.. .., ..,ty- . ....,.. I t _ . I t -
-.Z. :„.:.r. , ., .;
- . ..l. .,11 ., . ,. ..7.... .7 .z,.:02 1=1.4 . . 1.., 4 •C' . .tolasy -- A.:4 . -1--•,. -. . 1.:,:..• _ . _:.... ' - ,
5.SI. '1'e t . .• ' • ' 1. 1 .., *2. -r, , •-• :_..1 • k ' - ,_,,,..,,
7n . 'rad n ,-...c ve •-t-- 1•••,- .t, , 4. -, .. _ . „., .,_ Ill.., „..,,....._ _ ,_ .,_4„, k , , _
Livi.---4,- . 4.:, .,:lit,?-4-..., -44 ' 1;;;......„ • . •.1.$ • 4.;,. fli . --21 ,..., 4.._ ,.4,,..,...„.4__-,,, ,. , i, .
,-r,.., i•• .. b.: • A-17.% Pt:, .'"„ • 4 ...T '-'- "TicilI I 128,4 1.1.40" — „..,, 1/4 • , 'tilt-d ' T 1'4,
i 4 iio •a-Aorsi •-c;:,-7-17, ' . ....,,,:( ,-, - oi„,.. . z • i,,, . ,, -. - , •••• • .. Tr • ; ;Fr..itik ,,r(f4 --•-• f4.: ,
4 b , - ...,44,,. ,i, -.,-,,:_,. -' ^. I —1 1 ° r, . . ' . .• ---”' • .4: .t.
p 1 m Fq ........r, Litt.,"2741 . . '/ + • o•••-;-.:, '.,,.-... fit _, r „.,,... ."4. ‘.--,,#*;'--:::-"e"•''s ••1*, ‘` ti..-.. 9i, ;-i,-, Ltd
:•Iktilr413'1' 1 - ---"" • -"-c. - ,,_ . . - -
i IMff-..gff: 1., - . 1 ., ,,-; , w.,....i4.,., ,:.....,„ . , . 1.44 t • ''‘') t•J't.4. -.. , -
- ;,,Jer-- '...-e,r411":,tz., . , ';; .
7....stixvi‘•.:.19) - • } -7-. .t . 24;4,-il .., ,. ' .34622'1`-'i • , P7- w vc.., ::1F4 i '...? -1. ,.. ,•
r...r.%.-...4p7-;e•-.„_ - - -, ... „ .. ,,, •V'1,2ter: ,...., ,. . • t .r.-• v.',
? 1 4 r ,,,. -7,•• . ,t,.. ... cL , ..0.4._,„,(.••• ..,1, I r,..- . ,'" - ."..2 ..*1*.' -,- 1., I Wel . -. A,1 I' i * ; .,. • -, °N. Si.'
-,,,-f- '-‘,"4, . ,-,., , .0_ , ..__.-- ..-.1,-- _ V
I ..s.-,-,;-„ZTA N— '1 E 1 Ott a , II1T ...., r a t„,,,-,4 clo 'pft R di,--',-5-,.• ,.....' a q.. ..,721 --13 )"" ,0---!.- - -...Jusl E 101-1-alirq,...1.1 r :r • c 'li n,. -0....- • ..-,- ..• r ,,-.
1 I,' • q . il i :77 pl, 4; rI • i,1:..itE.,iia_cia ur, — • rit•7'•-12,7.L- ;,-: r f 1.11 ,"'-• , 'I :• .
I 's ,pr.,-... . • i- , -,-; ra , . , pit_IN -• z - - .,,-7, , , ,-, -1 r- , , - r —R ti e -dr6• )ri 1 r N(1 - -"4"7" -••••T•4-.•` "
' :=,-"t•Fi . " ..1 .-.,-* kV 5 r. ,,e-.. -- "-:---i---; ,-'- ' r ..'-',:'",' P — ••-' .1 4 •C3' .'
,f-§it 11,1(7). ' -;-'51 % TwilAffis:z_. .' - • `i ' r-r s- E -.I t_. LomaR '.5 ' ' -4, '''? Verdps ` '•*-A Dr • -
4,1,1..4-i: • i:. -47.-14-' 0-., !.,.• Nlie, • • . pn 14"510•,,km; 1- I 1 -, : r —II .1 qrf ' : 1 ' 7 ' . a_hti
ITE11 (72.zp';017"-All:b '''• --' " r.-3.,-.L,T,..' — ' — 4,E; c av';',3'd ,_41 17)r - A • i,.- ..-li - •
?t' kk•I'T .4:4Cir ',i . ..... . 6 _ J__ - • e.z..,,Fr.11•., • . .,,....
• - ...... 4.,., •-',.7. WI , ri.410.40, ! f'..°.
ril • t• • .. • til r1:5 ''. koft,LIvizEtim.. p• .,,, .
_ ' ' , ' el - ,'-ii' I PL.- v. :, L.. 6:-. . ,i.1.,-.., . - . Ion-lax . c • i.
. -4FZ. ". ..•,-- . . • -....t• • - --eg,---g. ." -rip.*•••,-..._ . ..,ti, • .:. .,-,,---wl„.4.„.'„tte.„•el.,...„„,,,,,., . , t ....
*- '' '4. . 4 . .4-11.. -..„4; . ,r. 4, ' ki.F.,-.1....:, . ••0,44.,." .,-'&.•\,,..q,. --f-•;,, ... :-- -;',,-.•: "-----;:-_,' -- ....11.).„...., _,..„ ..
--' ,e'.,e'•.;, J-..-s,-,•:,•:,-p-..„::?::c-•Z'--,•':'..,::;'4:r''-'7.:;t::ili.L:r_:.
:?:-.-: -.„, :.:..71-4::: 4
-,FJ,:'2.4..,:)"-,?" -kl.. 1,` . l.'' '' .4;le,41:: 4 '3'.?• . L'i.:4 .‘':,tivtjAl -t'''' • : - -.• :,k, -.., ..., ' . .44-44, —,:`,..7:...s._ •..
....i.,.. iyo'ovilk--- .1t: • •,‘-‘, ' '.-1 • P. ''''''''
'
..
•r, - r- \ I „ _ ,,,;,1•••
...., ,",,.Ii,1: ,- ,,A4 '4. , .."7-1.i. . ..--*1.,:s.. . . ..erpw
;,, .l. • ' , • - . -1 • , - '• . . - ,...., 1-1••• 4.-, ..,1 .;,......c ..-irt'.
'••• 40 e, • r 4, 2; ...: i •
-1 . • . , t. e 'd r - . ' 10Yra
. ei ' e •
• • . • V., % ,.. `i.
" "j # • . ,
.....,-.... - t ..'1 , A , ....;;,.. , 09 ,f,,s!k4 •
' a -',,,, ; ,, .•.1, ' -4w. ' '. ', ;.'‘'., , ' " ,
, IC , - A. ,fi, . 4, . ''''''' ' ' 'r' 0 ' • • ''' ii. k •
.4
V. - - . ..c. .r. 4,17; c • '':• ' • ..
4' . .. T'-. 3'
'• . +.' .1. .. .2 .
. • -C. .., ' • '
4.
• f''''''''.4 . ' " '''' , . . ... 13,, • a • 1 y,-..I-1 -.
" /* "4. . ' s .P.:,.• 1.-4•X • .
Application Name: LaBorde Property
Legal Description
TO5N RO6E 032,
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
602 299.5222
KAREN NABITY KARENNABITY@GMAIL COM Z2018124
Case Address Parcel Primary: 219-39-032A
26623 N 144TH St
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85262
Generated January 3, 2019 14:26 PM Gross Acres: 2.5 approx. Map scale 1:20,400
Supervisor District No. 2
CHANGE ZONING FROM RU-190 TO RU-43 SO WE MAY BUILD ONE HOME
WE
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ

''es i DeNr oil_ ir& Qccr d\Jetale- 1-0-34fte--PeoPiRT
Av3Aceurr °Se - 'R0-19 0 (ViicAnir5
V\-Pel4-1c ,
—Paw
ficol
(Ne.kess EGRE: ss 5L')I
I \IP j
Tseenc: us)
IS
kaac--J
1801
nz) 1 NoitTti
''REs Itz Kt ee 601
EL-1- EA-SetV1ef4.r ,OC O 51= Ordar
tNi cot
I
<lee ,,VCV
/ e / r I / /
101.0 • / t I • I
34:)(
oaa-61cere7 usE-- mcbowe nitm 2eGA 0 w--?,4
e219-.34i- 0301-4 Fee-r-
0\1\0.4E12: Loc.te. E Oieoe-
UT71r\ oR rz.e: .AGe.A•17C-_- r.:Y
50 in PI A (2-Y : ax Z.t)01'n216 - R.u- Icto-veicANT---Resteien+10,1
TaoPoseD -Zonct izo.443_Rsidevti.ca-Butice V-11I1:tTY MA?
err To scALT 3
Ric) Veetoo "DR
a s-c- -70 rte&apicke Trall C 0--tcto 4-0 R.0-45 +-o
,IcL or4 hone-

Title Page
LaBorde Property
Narrative
General Location:
On 144th St. 1 mile south of Rio Verde Dr
NE of Scottsdale, AZ in
Case #:Z.401Y/;-- 1-1
Rio Verde Dr
Cavedale Dr
McDowell MTN Regional Park
IVED NOV 0 7 2018

Purpose of Request: This Parcel is a 2.5 Acre parcel (108,900 SF) and is zoned RU-190. The current owner,
Lucie LaBorde, applied for a variance in 2006 which was not the correct avenue for a zoning change and was
denied.
The Authorized Agent is requesting a change in Zoning from RU-190 to RU-43 to make this a buildable
lot for her daughter, son-in-law and 2 grandchildren to build a new home for their family. The purpose for the
zoning change is to allow for one single family home to be built on this property. There are no plans to divide
this property. In fact, based on the Site Plan — the location of the septic, house, setbacks and current well
location this lot would not be dividable. This assures this a 2.5 acre lot will only accommodate one house.
Description of proposal: This zoning change will continue the current rural residential use. By changing
the zoning from RU-190 to RU-43 it simply allows for this 2.5 acre lot to have a single family home built on it.
This lot is contiguous with the 23 lots directly west of this lot that are zoned RU-43, we are simply requesting
this parcel to be zoned to the same standard. The plans are to build a single family home that will
complement the surrounding homes.
Relationship to surrounding properties:
On the West side, the TWENTY THREE contiguous lots that back up to the McDowell Mountain Regional Park
are all zoned RU-43. The first 7 of these lots are only 43,560 - 55,515 square feet. This lot will be a larger lot so
will not lower the value of those homes. Also, the placement of the home will give those neighbors extra
space for viewing pleasure. The width of their lot would fit between our home and the west lot line of our
property. Our request to change the zoning to RU-43 with no splits keeps this a 2.5 acre lot which should be
appreciated by the neighbors. Only one new home instead of two! We see no negative for the neighbors.
On the North and East side is an L shaped 7.5 acre property. This property is vacant. In my last conversation
with the property owner, Grant Hertel, he stated that he will be leaving this property for his children.
On the South side of the property is the McDowell Mountain Regional Park.
In our strong opinion —this zoning change should be approved to allow this property to be used for its best
potential — a single family home.
Location and Accessibility: Location is on 144th St. South of Rio Verde Dr. Take 144th south almost a mile
and it dead ends into a private gate located on Mr. McMurtry's property. There is a filed ingress/egress that
goes through the gate to the subject property - recording #20060617609.
Circulation System: No dedications planned.
Development Schedule: Build time to be approximately 12 months.
Community facilities: This property will border the McDowell Mountain Regional Park.
Public Utilities and Services: SRP Electric, Rural Metro (Fire Dept.), Septic and Hauled Water. Well — This
well is governed by the "Quail Track Shared Well Rules and Regulations" which is filed with Maricopa County
under Docket 13969, Page 303.

Maricopa County
Environmental Services
Department
• • • • 11 . •1 • ••• • a
Planning Subdivision Program Infrastructure & DATE: November 15, 2018
1001 N. Central Avenue #150
Phoenix, Phone: (602) Arizona 506-1058 85004 TO: Derek Scheerer, Planning & Development Dept.
Fax: (602) 506-5813 Planner
TDD 602 506 6704
FROM: Souren Naradikian, RE.
Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Rezone from RU-190 to RU-43. Z2018124
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has
reviewed documents received from the Maricopa County Planning and
Development Department for the above referenced project. This request is for
Rezone from RU-190 to RU-43 to accommodate new house building at APN#
219-39-032A. Water and sewer will be provided by existing well and new septic
system. MCESD has no concerns, NOID must be obtained prior to construction
building permit approval.
Stormwater - The parcel is not located in the urbanized unincorporated area,
and therefore, not regulated by the Maricopa County Stormwater Quality
Program.
Based on the above, MCESD raised no concerns to this project to the
Planning & Development Department in Accela Automation on November 15,
2018 and the project may proceed at this time subject to the following
stipulations:
Stipulations: None.
It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project.
Comments are provided only as advisory to Maricopa County Planning and
Development Department to assist staff to prepare a staff report. Other
Maricopa County agencies may have additional requirements. Final review and
approval will be made through Planning and Development Department
procedures. Applicant may need to submit separate applications to the
Maricopa County Environmental Services Department for approval of proposed
facilities regulated by the Department. Review of any such application will be
based on regulations in force at the time of application.

Maricopa County
Planning & Development Department
Date: November 21st, 2018
Simon Edwards
Planning & Development
501 North 44th Street, Suite 200 Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director,
Phoenix, Phone: (602) Arizona 372-0580 85008 Department of Planning & Development
Fax: (602) 506-3282
www.maricopa.gov/planning Email address: Attn: Derek Scheerer, Planner, Planning & Development Services
SimonEdwandsemail.maricona.00v
From: Simon Edwards, Engineering Associate,
Planning & Development Services
CC: Michael Norris, P.E., Drainage Engineering Manager,
Planning & Development Services
Subject: Z2018124 — Zone Change From RU-190 TO RU-43 — El
Memo
Job Site Address: 26601 N 1441h Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85262
APN(s): 219-39-032A
Engineering plan review (DPR, FCD and PND Transportation) has reviewed the Zone
Change application date stamped 11/07/2018, and has no objections to the proposed re-
zoning, subject to the following stipulations:
1. No development approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to
drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed
as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review
and/or entitlement.
2. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards;
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual;
and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
3. At the time of applying for Buildings Permits please note that the application will
need to be accompanied by a set of engineered Grading & Drainage Plans.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require clarification of these
comments.

Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
From: RDSA-IT Helpdesk <rdsaithelpdesk@maiLmaricopa.gov >
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2018 9:40 AM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX
Subject: Issue #157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale
(Planning and Development) As Next Action
Next Action has been set for following Issue in IssueTrak:
Issue #: 157988
Subject: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale
Status: Open
Division Type: Development Services
Sub Type 1: Planning
Sub Type 2: Support/Opposition for a Project
Priority: Medium
Project:
Division: PNDDevServ Development Services
Organization: Planning and Development
Submitted By: Coggins, Lori on 27-Dec-2018 602-372-3627
Assigned To: CustomerService, PND on 27-Dec-2018
Next Action: Scheerer, Derek on 27-Dec-2018 602-506-6533
Issue Description:
Zoning and Planning board
I am writing to address my concerns around the change of zoning from RU-190 to RU-43
outlined in Z2018124. Even with the "Promise" to put 1 house per 2.5 ache the
developer will have the full right to put 1 house / 1 ache per law. This is not acceptable
for the following reasons.
• This area is a sensitive area bordering the county park and is home to many unique
and protected local wild life which would be impacted by this development.
• The original plan was to preserve this land East of 144th to large 5+ ache lots to lower
the density to protect this special area and provide an area for agriculture use.
o Placing residential properties with smaller lots in this area is in conflict with the
general use for this area and will result in conflict.
• Lowering the density to RU-43 will allow the developer to put 1 home per ache in this
area greatly raising the density along the park.
• This sets a precedence for other developers to do the same which will degrade the
original plan to protect this area from development to preserve the natural resources
1

and habitat for the local wild life.
• The current traffic load on the unpaved 144th St. is already creating a large amount of
dust and destroying the natural vegetation along the road, this rezoning area is at the
end of 144 so will greatly add to this problem.
• Water is already a concern, nearly 50% of the wells in the area are dry or under
producing. The existing well will not provide enough water for this level of density which
will further cause more traffic with water trucks, drilling more wells in this area will
cause more stress to the local aquifer and cause more dry wells in the area.
Research needs to be prescribed before any consideration of change can be properly
reviewed.
• The impact to protected wild life.
• Aquifer draw down for the increased number of residents.
• Traffic load on 144th
• Air quality impact
• Balance of density, if developer wants to raise the density along the park, they must
lower an equal amount of density within the local area IE: Section 31
I will also attempt to be present for the zoning meeting and present in person. If I am
unable to attend the meeting please consider this as my rebuttal to the board.
Eric Repec
26909 N. 142nd Way
Eric Repec
Technologent CI3 Practice Lead
Continuous Intelligence
Cl 313.806.3729
El eric.repec@technologent.com
Why Technologent?
2

Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX
From: Wolfgang Stobbe <netteta1465@gmail.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 2,2019 11:09 AM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Issue #157988
I am joining my neighbors in this matter. Lot 219-39-076P
Please include me into your mailing list regarding this concern
Edith + Wolfgang Stobbe
27827 N 143rd St

Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
From: George Waldren <george.waldren@gmail.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 4:45 PM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Issue #157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale
(Planning and Development) As Next Action
Zoning and Planning board
I am writing to address my concerns around the change of zoning from RU-190 to RU-43 outlined in
Z2018124. Even with the "Promise" to put 1 house per 2.5 acre the developer will have the full right to
put 1 house / 1 acre per law. This is not acceptable for the following reasons.
• This area is a sensitive area bordering the county park and is home to many unique and protected
local wild life which would be impacted by this development.
• The original plan was to preserve this land East of 144th to large 5+ acre lots to lower the density to
protect this special area and provide an area for agriculture use.
o Placing residential properties with smaller lots in this area is in conflict with the general use for this
area and will result in conflict.
• Lowering the density to RU-43 will allow the developer to put 1 home per acre in this area greatly
raising the density along the park.
• This sets a precedence for other developers to do the same which will degrade the original plan to
protect this area from development to preserve the natural resources and habitat for the local wild life.
• The current traffic load on the unpaved 144th St. is already creating a large amount of dust and
destroying the natural vegetation along the road, this rezoning area is at the end of 144 so will greatly
add to this problem.
• Water is already a concern, nearly 50% of the wells in the area are dry or under producing. The
existing well will not provide enough water for this level of density which will further cause more traffic
with water trucks, drilling more wells in this area will cause more stress to the local aquifer and cause
more dry wells in the area.
Research needs to be prescribed before any consideration of change can be properly reviewed.
• The impact to protected wild life.
• Aquifer draw down for the increased number of residents.
• Traffic load on 144th
• Air quality impact
• Balance of density, if developer wants to raise the density along the park, they must lower an equal
amount of density within the local area IE: Section 31
I will also attempt to be present for the zoning meeting and present in person. If I am unable to attend
the meeting please consider this as my rebuttal to the board.
Regards,
George Waldren
14306 E Cavedale Dr (lot #219-39-211D)
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
917-723-1235

Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
From: Carol Cabalka <peteycic@aol.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 12:37 PM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
Cc: tIcabalka@gmail.com
Subject: Change of Zoning Concern
Zoning and Planning board
We are writing to address our concerns around the change of zoning from RU-190 to RU-43 outlined in
Z2018124. Even with the "Promise" to put 1 house per 2.5 ache the developer will have the full right to put 1
house / 1 ache per law. This is not acceptable for the following reasons.
• This area is a sensitive area bordering the county park and is home to many unique and protected local wild
life which would be impacted by this development.
• The original plan was to preserve this land East of 144th to large 5+ ache lots to lower the density to protect
this special area and provide an area for agriculture use. Placing residential properties with smaller lots in this
area is in conflict with the general use for this area and will result in conflict
• Lowering the density to RU-43 will allow the developer to put 1 home per ache in this area greatly raising the
density along the park.
• This sets a precedence for other developers to do the same which will degrade the original plan to protect this
area from development to preserve the natural resources and habitat for the local wild life.
• The current traffic load on the unpaved 144th St. is already creating a large amount of dust and destroying the
natural vegetation along the road, this rezoning area is at the end of 144 so will greatly add to this problem.
• Water is already a concern, nearly 50% of the wells in the area are dry or under producing. The existing well
will not provide enough water for this level of density which will further cause more traffic with water trucks,
drilling more wells in this area will cause more stress to the local aquifer and cause more dry wells in the area.
Research needs to be prescribed before any consideration of change can be properly reviewed.
• The impact to protected wild life.
• Aquifer draw down for the increased number of residents.
• Traffic load on 144th
• Air quality impact
• Balance of density, if developer wants to raise the density along the park, they must lower an equal amount of
density within the local area IE: Section 31
We will also attempt to be present for the zoning meeting and present in person. If We am unable to attend the
meeting please consider this as our rebuttal to the board.
Very Sincerely,
Carol and Tom Cabalka
27005 N 143rd Place
Scottsdale, Az 85262
Parcel ID 219-39-205A
1

Sent from my iPad
2

From: RDSA-IT Helpdesk
To: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX
Subject: Issue #158125, Next Action assigned w/note: no support of zone change z2018124 (Planning and Development)
As Next Action
Date: Thursday, January 3, 2019 3:15:00 PM
*===*
A note on Next Action was added to the following Issue in IssueTrak:
Issue #: 158125
Subject: no support of zone change z2018124
Status: Open
Division Type: Development Services
Sub Type 1: Planning
Sub Type 2: Support/Opposition for a Project
Priority: Medium
Project:
Division: PNDDevServ Development Services
Organization: Planning and Development
Submitted By: Janowicz, Ellen on 02-Jan-2019 602-372-3746
Assigned To: CustomerService, PND on 02-Jan-2019
Next Action: Scheerer,' Derek on 03-Jan-2019 602-506-6533
Issue Description:
Zoning and Planning board
I am writing to address my concerns around the change of zoning from
RU-190 to RU-43 outlined in Z2018124. Even with the "Promise" to put 1
house per 2.5 ache the developer will have the full right to put 1 house / 1
acre per law. I feel this is not acceptable and the zoning change should not
be approved for the following reasons.
• This area is bordering the county park and is home to many unique and
protected local wild life which would be impacted by this development.
• The original plan was to preserve this land East of 144th to large 5+
ache lots. This requirement was to lower the density to protect this special
area and provide an area for agriculture use.
o The zoning change is to build residential properties with smaller lots in
this area and is in conflict with the general use for this area.
• Lowering the density to RU-43 will allow the developer to put 1 home per
acre in this area greatly raising the density along the park.
• This sets a precedence for other developers to do the same which will
degrade the original plan to protect this area from development to
preserve the natural resources and habitat for the local wild life.
• Due to the construction of the additional horse ranches on 144th, the
increased traffic load on the unpaved 144th St. is already creating a large

amount of dust and destroying the natural vegetation along the road. The
increase in residential homes with the this rezoning at the end of 144th
will greatly add to this problem.
• Currently there is NO county maintenance of 144th. The task of
maintaining this road is handled by residents, at their expense. If
additional residences are allowed due to the rezoning, this maintenance
will be come a monumental task and unfair for those who are currently
maintaining.
• Water is already a concern, nearly 50% of the wells in the area are dry
or under producing. Drilling more wells in this area will cause more stress
to the local aquifer and cause more dry wells in the area. This will leave
current residents with the dilemma of either re-drilling a new deeper well
or having water hauled for their residence.
Research needs to be prescribed before any consideration of change can
be properly reviewed.
• The impact to protected wild life.
• Aquifer draw down for the increased number of residents.
• Traffic load on 144th
• Air quality impact
• Balance of density, if developer wants to raise the density along the
park, they must lower an equal amount of density within the local area IE:
Section 31
Ginger Repec
My parcel #219-39-076q
27819 N 143rd St
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
Notes:
**Note by Banker, Raymond, 03-Jan-2019:
Forwarded to Derek as this is his assigned case.

Planning and Development Department
DATE: January 17, 2019
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Derek Scheerer, Planner
SUBJECT: Z2018124 - Laborde Property
Agenda Item: 11
Since the publishing of the staff report for the above case, staff received several letters
of support and opposition to the case from area residents. Staff has received seven (7)
letters of support and seven (7) letters of opposition, with one (1) letter of opposition being
withdrawn. All letters have been attached to this handout.
Attachment: 7 letters of support
7 letters of opposition
1 letter of withdrawn opposition

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: granthertel@aol.com
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 1:54 PM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX
Subject: Case #Z2018124 - Laborde Property
Attachments: Scan0060.pdf
Derek,
Attached is my letter of protest regarding the rezoning request for the Laborde property. I was able to contact the
McMurtry's who own the adjacent property to the west of the Laborde property. It turns out that Mr. McMurtry's wife just
died back in Illinois this past week which is why you have not heard anything further from them. Both Mr. McMurtry and
his son, who plans to build another home on their property, were surprised and seemed upset to learn that Lucie Laborde
was requesting an RU-43 zoning so you may hear more from them prior to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
next week. They had been under the impression that no more than one residence could ever be built on the property.
Thanks much for taking the time the other day to chat with me regarding this matter. I would appreciate it if you could
acknowledge receipt of this e-mail.
Sincerely,
Grant Hertel
14802 N. Skokie Ct.
Phoenix, AZ 85022
Cell phone # 602-509-8092
Owner of parcel #219-39-013L
1

January 11, 2019
Re: Case # Z2018124— Laborde Property
To: Derek Scheerer c/oMaricopa County Planning and Development Department
In follow-up to our recent phone conversation I am sending this letter protesting the proposed rezoning
of the Laborde Property and ask that this be forwarded to the Planning & Zoning Commission prior to
their meeting on January 17, 2019.
My wife and I own the "L" shaped property (Parcel #219-39-013L) that wraps around the east and north
borders of the Laborde Property. Initially we owned this parcel with my brother and his wife but in 2002
we purchased their interest and became the sole owners of the property.
Our home address in Phoenix is: 14802 N. Skokie Ct., Phoenix, AZ, 85022. My contact phone number is
602-509-8092.
In way of brief history we have owned our parcel since 1984, and purchased it with the understanding
that Section 32 was zoned as 5 acres and would remain that way. Lucie Laborde's husband, Tom
Laborde, had agreed to sell their 2.5 acres to us in 1984, with sale documents drawn up, however, Tom
was unable to secure the required signatures of all the well shareholders so the deal fell through. Then
in 2006, Lucie Laborde attempted to obtain a variance that would have allowed a lot area of 108,979 sq.
ft., rather than the 190,000 sq. ft. minimum required under Rural-190 zoning, in order to accommodate
construction of a single residence on the property. Both Jay Scott, who at that time owned the adjacent
property to the west of the Laborde property, along with my wife and I, protested that variance and the
Board of Adjustment ultimately turned down the request.
Our main reasons to protest the current rezoning request are as follows:
#1 — As when we originally purchased, our desire remains not to see small property, i.e. high density,
development immediately adjacent to us.
#2 — The current request to rezone to RU-43 opens the potential for the Laborde property to someday
be divided into two separate parcels with the prospect of two residences along with accompanying out
buildings (garages, sheds, horse corrals, etc.), which in conjunction with the well and water holding
tanks already existing on the 2.5 areas would begin to make for a very junky sight.
#3- Rezoning of the Laborde property to RU-43 would clearly devalue our property and very likely the
adjacent property to the west of the Laborde property, currently owned by the McMurtrys, especially
since the easement access to the Laborde property and the well runs through the McMurtry property.
My wife and I feel that the entire immediate surrounding neighborhood would be downgraded in terms
of both property value and life style quality should RU-43 zoning be granted.
Continued on P.2

P.2
#4 — Our long term plan is to give our parcel to our oldest son who plans to build a home there after
retiring in the next 8 years or so. Both he and his wife would also very much like to live in and find the
surrounding area to be much as it is today and was envisioned to be when initially zoned.
My wife and I certainly understand the predicament that Lucie Laborde finds herself in with the property
she owns. We can envision a number of solutions to resolve her problem but at a minimum we feel
there needs to be more stringent restrictions regarding the use of the Laborde parcel other than simply
rezoning it to RU-43.
Sincerely,
Grant A. and Susan M. Hertel
Ayi-euv,i;

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Eric Repec <ericrepec@technologent.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 12:57 PM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX
Subject: Re: Issue #157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale
(Planning and Development) As Next Action
Thank you for all of your help and timely information.
Please withdraw my opposition to this change.
Thank you
Eric Repec
From: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX <DerekScheerer@mail.maricopa.gov >
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 12:36:50 PM
To: Eric Repec
Subject: RE: Issue #157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale (Planning and
Development) As Next Action
Eric,
We have to go by what they request, and Rural-70 would be a spot zone as nothing around it is Rural-70. Staff
deliberated that suggestion.
Derek Scheerer
Planner
Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department
501 N. 44th St, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Office: (602) 506-6533
Email: DerekScheerer@mail.maricopa.gov
wwvv.maricopasiov/planning
Your feedback is important — Click HERE to let us know!
From: Eric Repec <eric.repec@technologent.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 11:36 AM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX <DerekScheerer@mail.maricopa.gov >
Subject: Re: Issue 4157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale (Planning and
Development) As Next Action
Just curious.
why can't you just change it to RU-70 for the 2.5 acre plot. This should block any ability to split and still have a
buildable lot.
1

Eric
From: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX <Dere kScheerer@mail.maricopa.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 8:29:34 AM
To: Eric Repec
Subject: RE: Issue #157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale (Planning and
Development) As Next Action
Eric,
No, there will not be any stipulation like that. We unfortunately cannot limit the request like that. The request is for a
straight rezone of the property from one district to another without seeking to waive any requirement/restriction of the
sought after district. If approved, she would be permitted all the rights and privileges, and also have to adhere to all of
the restrictions, that any other property in the Rural-43 would be held to.
Regards,
Derek Seheerer
Planner
Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department
501 N. 44th St, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Office: (602) 506-6533
Email: DerekScheerer@mail.maricopa.gov
www.maricopa.qov/planninq
Your feedback is important — Click HERE to let us know!
From: Eric Repec <ericsepec@technologent.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 6:44 AM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX <DerekScheererpmail.maricopa.gov >
Subject: Re: Issue #157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale (Planning and
Development) As Next Action
Derek,
Again I thank you so much for your support and hard work.
After gaining contact with the owner of this property I have a question.
Basically,
Want to verify that there is a stipulation that states if the 2.5 ache plot is further divided that the zoning will
revert back to RU-190?
Thanks
Eric
From: Derek Scheerer PLANDEVX <DerekScheerer@mail.maricopa.gov >
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2018 1:52:36 PM
2

To: Eric Repec
Subject: RE: Issue #157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Caveda le (Planning and
Development) As Next Action
Eric,
I have received your opposition to the case. It has been printed, added to the case file, official record, and will be
presented to the Commission at public hearing. If you could please provide me with a parcel number for your property I
would appreciate it. We have a clause where if a certain number of property owners by total number and total area
oppose a case it can trigger a majority vote by the Board of Supervisors for an approval. Hence, it Is important to know
what property the opposition is coming from. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly.
Thank you and Happy New Year,
Derek Scheerer
Planner
Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department
501 N. 44th St, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Office: (602) 506-6533
Email: DerekScheererPmail.maricopa.gov
Wwvv.maricopa.qov/planninq
Your feedback is important — Click HERE to let us know!
From: RDSA-IT Helpdesk <rdsaithelpdesk@mail.maricopa.gov >
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2018 9:40 AM
To: Derek Scheerer PLANDEVX <DerekScheerer@mail.maricopagov>
Subject: Issue #157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale (Planning and Development)
As Next Action
Next Action has been set for following Issue in IssueTrak:
Issue #: 157988
Subject: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale
Status: Open
Division Type: Development Services
Sub Type 1: Planning
Sub Type 2: Support/Opposition for a Project
Priority: Medium
Project:
Division: PNDDevServ Development Services
Organization: Planning and Development
Submitted By: Coggins, Lori on 27-Dec-2018 602-372-3627
Assigned To: CustomerService, PND on 27-Dec-2018
3

Next Action: .Scheerer, Derek on 27-Dec-2018 602-506-6533
Issue Description:
Zoning and Planning board
I am writing to address my concerns around the change of zoning from RU-190 to RU-43
outlined in Z2018124. Even with the "Promise" to put 1 house per 2.5 ache the
developer will have the full right to put 1 house / 1 ache per law. This is not acceptable
for the following reasons.
• This area is a sensitive area bordering the county park and is home to many unique
and protected local wild life which would be impacted by this development.
• The original plan was to preserve this land East of 144th to large 5+ ache lots to lower
the density to protect this special area and provide an area for agriculture use.
o Placing residential properties with smaller lots in this area is in conflict with the
general use for this area and will result in conflict.
• Lowering the density to RU-43 will allow the developer to put 1 home per ache in this
area greatly raising the density along the park.
• This sets a precedence for other developers to do the same which will degrade the
original plan to protect this area from development to preserve the natural resources
and habitat for the local wild life.
• The current traffic load on the unpaved 144th St. is already creating a large amount of
dust and destroying the natural vegetation along the road, this rezoning area is at the
end of 144 so will greatly add to this problem.
• Water is already a concern, nearly 50% of the wells in the area are dry or under
producing. The existing well will not provide enough water for this level of density which
will further cause more traffic with water trucks, drilling more wells in this area will
cause more stress to the local aquifer and cause more dry wells in the area.
Research needs to be prescribed before any consideration of change can be properly
reviewed.
• The impact to protected wild life.
• Aquifer draw down for the increased number of residents.
• Traffic load on 144th
• Air quality impact
• Balance of density, if developer wants to raise the density along the park, they must
lower an equal amount of density within the local area IE: Section 31
I will also attempt to be present for the zoning meeting and present in person. If I am
unable to attend the meeting please consider this as my rebuttal to the board.
Eric Repec
26909 N. 142nd Way
Eric Repec
Technologent CI3 Practice Lead
4

Continuous Intelligence
CI 313.806.3729
EJ eric.repecRtechnologent.com
Why Technologent?
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or
have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or
have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or
have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
5

•Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Jaclyn Sarnowski - PLANDEVX
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 3:27 PM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
Subject: FW: Z201818124 zoning change 144th and Cavendale
From: Pat Fumagalli <patfumagallis@gmail.com >
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 1:10 PM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER <PDONCALLPLANNER2@mail.maricopa.gov >; pdcustomerservice
<pdcustomerservice@mailmaricopa.gov >
Subject: Z201818124 zoning change 144th and Cavendale
Zoning and Planning board
I am writing to address my concerns around the change of zoning from RU-190 to RU-43 outlined in
Z2018124. Even with the "Promise" to put 1 house per 2.5 ache the developer will have the full right to put 1
house / 1 ache per law. This is not acceptable for the following reasons.
• This area is a sensitive area bordering the county park and is home to many unique and protected local
wild life which would be impacted by this development.
• The original plan was to preserve this land East of 144th to large 5+ ache lots to lower the density to
protect this special area and provide an area for agriculture use.
0 Placing residential properties with smaller lots in this area is in conflict with the general use for
this area and will result in conflict.
• Lowering the density to RU-43 will allow the developer to put 1 home per ache in this area greatly
raising the density along the park.
• This sets a precedence for other developers to do the same which will degrade the original plan to
protect this area from development to preserve the natural resources and habitat for the local wild
life.
• The current traffic load on the unpaved 144th St. is already creating a large amount of dust and
destroying the natural vegetation along the road, this rezoning area is at the end of 144 so will greatly
add to this problem.
• Water is already a concern, nearly 50% of the wells in the area are dry or under producing. The
existing well will not provide enough water for this level of density which will further cause more traffic
with water trucks, drilling more wells in this area will cause more stress to the local aquifer and cause
more dry wells in the area.
Research needs to be prescribed before any consideration of change can be properly reviewed.
• The impact to protected wild life.
• Aquifer draw down for the increased number of residents.
1

• Traffic load on 144th
• Air quality impact
• Balance of density, if developer wants to raise the density along the park, they must lower an equal
amount of density within the local area 1E: Section 31
I will also attempt to be present for the zoning meeting and present in person. If I am unable to attend the
meeting please consider this as my rebuttal to the board.
Pat Fumagalli
14535 E Pinnacle Vista Dr
Scottsdale AZ 85262
480 5403686
2

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Wolfgang Stobbe <netteta1465@gmail.com >
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 3:04 PM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Re: Issue #157988
Hello Derek,
In reply to your email I state my opposition to case # Z2018124
Edith + Wolfgang Stobbe
lot # 219-39-076P
27827 N 143rd St
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 12:34 PM Derek Scheerer PLANDEVX <DerekScheerer@rnail.maricopa.gov> wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
Can you please send me another email stating your opposition or support to the case? The case number is Z2018124.
Thank you,
Derek Scheerer
Planner
Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department
501 N. 44th St, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Office: (602) 506-6533
Email: DerekScheerer@maiLmaricopa.gov
www.maricopa.goviplanning
1

Your feedback is important — Click HERE to let us know!
From: Wolfgang Stobbe <netteta1465@gmail.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 11:09 AM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX <DerekScheererPmail.maricopa.gov >
Subject: Issue #157988
am joining my neighbors in this matter. Lot 219-39-076P
Please include me into your mailing list regarding this concern
Edith + Wolfgang Stobbe
27827 N 143rd St
2

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Jaclyn Sarnowski - PLANDEVX
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 8:31 AM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
Subject: FW: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale
From: Ginger Repec <grepec@msn.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 11:39 AM
To: pdcustomerservice <pdcustomerservice@mail.maricopa.gov >; PD ON CALL PLANNER
<PD0NCAL1PLANNER2@mall.maricopa.gov >
Subject: Re: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale
Zoning and Planning board
I am writing to address my concerns around the change of zoning from RU-190 to RU-43
outlined in 22018124. Even with the "Promise" to put 1 house per 2.5 ache the developer will
have the full right to put 1 house / 1 acre per law. I feel this is not acceptable and the zoning
change should not be approved for the following reasons.
• This area is bordering the county park and is home to many unique and protected local
wild life which would be impacted by this development.
• The original plan was to preserve this land East of 144th to large 5+ ache lots. This
requirement was to lower the density to protect this special area and provide an area
for agriculture use.
o The zoning change is to build residential properties with smaller lots in this area
and is in conflict with the general use for this area.
• Lowering the density to RU-43 will allow the developer to put 1 home per acre in this
area greatly raising the density along the park.
• This sets a precedence for other developers to do the same which will degrade the
original plan to protect this area from development to preserve the natural resources
and habitat for the local wild life.
• Due to the construction of the additional horse ranches on 144th, the increased
traffic load on the unpaved 144th St. is already creating a large amount of dust and
destroying the natural vegetation along the road. The increase in residential homes with
the this rezoning at the end of 144th will greatly add to this problem.
• Currently there is NO county maintenance of 144th. The task of maintaining this road is
handled by residents, at their expense. If additional residences are allowed due to the
rezoning, this maintenance will be come a monumental task and unfair for those who
are currently maintaining.
1

• Water is already a concern, nearly 50% of the wells in the area are dry or under
producing. Drilling more wells in this area will cause more stress to the local aquifer and
cause more dry wells in the area. This will leave current residents with the dilemma of
either re-drilling a new deeper well or having water hauled for their residence.
Research needs to be prescribed before any consideration of change can be properly reviewed.
• The impact to protected wild life.
• Aquifer draw down for the increased number of residents.
• Traffic load on 144th
• Air quality impact
• Balance of density, if developer wants to raise the density along the park, they must
lower an equal amount of density within the local area IE: Section 31
Ginger Repec
My parcel #219-39-076q
27819 N 143rd St
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
2

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Carol Cabalka <peteycic@aoLcom>
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 12:37 PM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLANDEVX
Cc: tIcabalka©gmail.com
Subject: Change of Zoning Concern
Zoning and Planning board
We are writing to address our concerns around the change of zoning from RU-190 to RU-43 outlined in
Z2018124. Even with the "Promise" to put 1 house per 2.5 ache the developer will have the full right to put 1
house / 1 ache per law. This is not acceptable for the following reasons.
• This area is a sensitive area bordering the county park and is home to many unique and protected local wild
life which would be impacted by this development.
• The original plan was to preserve this land East of 144th to large 5+ ache lots to lower the density to protect
this special area and provide an area for agriculture use. Placing residential properties with smaller lots in this
area is in conflict with the general use for this area and will result in conflict.
• Lowering the density to RU-43 will allow the developer to put 1 home per ache in this area greatly raising the
density along the park.
• This sets a precedence for other developers to do the same which will degrade the original plan to protect this
area from development to preserve the natural resources and habitat for the local wild life.
• The current traffic load on the unpaved 144th St. is already creating a large amount of dust and destroying the
natural vegetation along the road, this rezoning area is at the end of 144 so will greatly add to this problem.
• Water is already a concern, nearly 50% of the wells in the area are dry or under producing. The existing well
will not provide enough water for this level of density which will further cause more traffic with water trucks,
drilling more wells in this area will cause more stress to the local aquifer and cause more dry wells in the area.
Research needs to be prescribed before any consideration of change can be properly reviewed.
• The impact to protected wild life.
• Aquifer draw down for the increased number of residents.
• Traffic load on 144th
• Air quality impact
• Balance of density, if developer wants to raise the density along the park, they must lower an equal amount of
density within the local area IE: Section 31
We will also attempt to be present for the zoning meeting and present in person. If We am unable to attend the
meeting please consider this as our rebuttal to the board.
Very Sincerely,
Carol and Tom Cabalka
27005 N 143rd Place
Scottsdale, Az 85262
Parcel ID 219-39-205A

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: George Waldren <george.waldren@gmail.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 4:45 PM
To: Derek Scheerer - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Issue #157988, Next Action assigned: Z2018124 zoning change 144th and Cavedale
(Planning and Development) As Next Action
Zoning and Planning board
I am writing to address my concerns around the change of zoning from RU-190 to RU-43 outlined in
Z2018124. Even with the "Promise" to put 1 house per 2.5 acre the developer will have the full right to
put 1 house /1 acre per law. This is not acceptable for the following reasons.
• This area is a sensitive area bordering the county park and is home to many unique and protected
local wild life which would be impacted by this development.
• The original plan was to preserve this land East of 144th to large 5+ acre lots to lower the density to
protect this special area and provide an area for agriculture use.
o Placing residential properties with smaller lots in this area is in conflict with the general use for this
area and will result in conflict.
• Lowering the density to RU-43 will allow the developer to put 1 home per acre in this area greatly
raising the density along the park.
• This sets a precedence for other developers to do the same which will degrade the original plan to
protect this area from development to preserve the natural resources and habitat for the local wild life.
• The current traffic load on the unpaved 144th St. is already creating a large amount of dust and
destroying the natural vegetation along the road, this rezoning area is at the end of 144 so will greatly
add to this problem.
• Water is already a concern, nearly 50% of the wells in the area are dry or under producing. The
existing well will not provide enough water for this level of density which will further cause more traffic
with water trucks, drilling more wells in this area will cause more stress to the local aquifer and cause
more dry wells in the area.
Research needs to be prescribed before any consideration of change can be properly reviewed.
• The impact to protected wild life.
• Aquifer draw down for the increased number of residents.
• Traffic load on 144th
• Air quality impact
• Balance of density, if developer wants to raise the density along the park, they must lower an equal
amount of density within the local area IE: Section 31
I will also attempt to be present for the zoning meeting and present in person. If I am unable to attend
the meeting please consider this as my rebuttal to the board.
Regards,
George Waldren
14306 E Cavedale Dr (lot #219-39-211D)
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
917-723-1235
1

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Dawn Morris <rockingpm@yahoo.com >
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 8:40 PM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Cc: karennabity@gmail.com
Subject: Approval of zoning change
TO: Maricopa County Planning & Development
RE: Zoning Change Case # Z2018124
This email is to confirm that I fully support the zoning change from RU-190 to RU-43 so a single family home can be built
on this 2.5 acres. Please approve!
Dawn Morris
31435 N 164 St
Scottsdale,Az 85262
Rockingpm@yahoo.com
Sent from my iPhone
1

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Jeanine Briguglio <jeaninescc@gmailcom>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 9:04 AM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Cc: Karen N
Subject: Zoning Change Case # Z2018124
TO: Maricopa County Planning & Development
This email is to confirm that I fully support the zoning change from RU-190 to RU-43 so a single family home can be built
on this 2.5 acres. Please approve!
Blessings,
Jeanine Briguglio
15716 E. Mark Lane
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
480-688-1111
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jeanine Briguglio
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 10:08 PM
To: PDPIanner@mail.maricopa.gov
Cc: Karen N
Subject: Zoning Change Case # Z2018124
TO: Maricopa County Planning & Development
This email is to confirm that I fully support the zoning change from RU-190 to RU-43 so a single family home can be built
on this 2.5 acres. Please approve!
Blessings,
Jeanine Briguglio
Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: MIKE BRIGUGLIO <MIKEBRIGUGLI0@msn.com >
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 9:28 AM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Cc: karennabity@gmail.com
Subject: Zoning Change Case #Z2018124
TO: Maricopa County Planning & Development
This email is to confirm that I fully support the zoning change from RU-190 to RU-43 so a single family home can be built
on this 2.5 acres. Please approve!
Sincerely,
Mike Briguglio
15716 E. Mark Lane
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
480-707-3199
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
1

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Doug Farrington <dougfarrington@gmail.com >
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:44 PM
To: KarenNabity@gmail.com; PD ON CALL PLANNER
Subject: Zoning Case # Z2018124
TO: Planning and Development
Zoning Case # Z2018124
This email is to confirm that I support the zoning change from RU-190 to RU-43 so a home can be built on this
2.5 acres.
Thank you,
Doug Farrington
29619 N 138th St.
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(Mobile) 602-820-3093
1

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Nikki Thorkelson <nikki.thorkelson@gmail.com >
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 11:15 AM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Cc: karennabity@gmail.com
Subject: Zoning change case #Z2018124
TO: Maricopa County Planning & Development
RE: Zoning Change Case # Z2018124
I support the zoning change from RU-190 to RU-43 so a home can be built on this 2.5 acres.
Nikki Thorkelson
Nikki.thorkelson@gmail.com
951-219-2449
26811 N 137TH ST
Scottsdale. AZ. 85262

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Anne Hunt <annehunt13@gmail.com >
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 4:42 PM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Cc: Karen N
Subject: Zoning
I TO: Planning & Development
1 Zoning Change Z2018124
i I support the zoning change from RU-190 to RU-43 so a home can be built on this 2.5 acres.
Anne Hunt
29209 N 136th Street
Scottsdale AZ 85262
9522409454

Derek Scheerer (PND)
From: Keith Thorkelson <keith.thorkelson@yahoo.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 9:03 AM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Cc: Nikki Thorkelson
Subject: Zoning Change Case #Z2018124
TO: Maricopa County Planning & Development
RE: Zoning Change Case # Z2018124
I support the zoning change from RU-190 to RU-43 so a home can be built on this 2.5 acres.
Keith Thorkelson
keith.thorkelson@yahoo.com
26811 N 137st
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
760-453-9690
1

/1/1/01a/C(
Yoom\ M44
7aA0011'' at'wd P-44m7
kt • laiem
3 Arad lin?
.2.010-$Ls,_w
3/opp /1/5/1•th.i,
fataM, /9z. g_5g4,
.6 WrOtiv---
I 5. 12)G E.PAanuilVflt raf
5wtt-A1C& (

(-740-1
ta.6-6-rdifie-
o
oviouo__
/ak
1-13,0 - 653.. O42.1xO

/ - ( i1) a-
etcv3.
, /4 a (Fs--2 4, e...
cp 0 - ./40 _ 3 yy,r--

sz,5 4,9,.601

1 1 laote
0.A9
Pir"-r-3 Q-kA346
CRO-41.0a
LQQ43
Itoao-kG-
14V‘"4-')
(-Fe° -- 660— r7c9 I

14u-k- JJ
aA,Zcopat Coce-,463,
e Act_ ,eoric iatz
D iialet944- a 40 izx (-15 .
w
3z.,10c- m. Jq3 4 pi.
..Ce.a-i-15 kit hz_ as-zto

C7
c'g 7x4-
W/C401.ce_ eV/17
/77 c-ZAR
ed-e/64‹_eic_,
3e-41-Cd•itt.
„,?)-2.4777 39/3


0 •2-i COR. ot‘./

I I /912olg
Att-tx Mskrtcpr -4I clet.,arbto
Ve: 4agrote-
ac-- 01' 4-Q-
cov1
>ue..• •
euVl i'Vt.G..1"1 el
137 30 • Cow-e441-e-
S co r7s 2-(0Z_

To: Maricopa County Planning & Zoning Division
Zoning Request Case# Z2018124
I fully support this request to change the zoning from RU-190 to RU-43. I would
like to see one home built on this property.
Namegc,.._idZJIA?)
Address i',.,,..,
5 6c-sc i ivi,
Phone # 1205-0- 4137---

To: Maricopa County Planning & Zoning Division
Zoning Request Case# Z2018124
I fully support this request to change the zoning from RU-190 to RU-43. I would
like to see one home built on this property.
Name
Address / (1 cdO Ca-cla-64
Phone #

Derelc Scheerer
From: RDSA-IT Helpdesk <rdsaithelpdesk@mail.maricopa.gov >
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 4:55 PM
To: Derek Scheerer
Subject: Issue #158720, Next Action assigned w/note: FW: Zoning Change Support for
#Z2018124 (Planning and Development) As Next Action
*===*
A note on Next Action was added to the following Issue in IssueTrak:
Issue #: 158720
Subject: FW: Zoning Change Support for #Z2018124
Status: Open
Division Type: Development Services
Sub Type 1: Planning
Sub Type 2: Support/Opposition for a Project
Priority:
Project:
Division:
Organization: Planning and Development
Submitted By: External User, PND on 16-Jan-2019
Assigned To: CustomerService, PND on 16-Jan-2019
Next Action: Scheerer, Derek on 16-Jan-2019 602-506-6533
Issue Description:
Submitted by direct email to rdsaithelpdesk.
From: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2019 14:14:41 (UTC-07:00) Arizona
To: pdcustomerservice
Subject: FW: Zoning Change Support for #Z2018124
From: Brittany Morris
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2019 14:14:23 (UTC-07:00) Arizona
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER; Karen N
Subject: Zoning Change Support for #Z2018124
I completely support the change in zoning to RU-43 on this lot to make it a buildable lot.
In reference to Zoning #Z2018124.
1

Brittany Morris
26926 N 138th St
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
480-313-1791
Notes:
**Note by Banker, Raymond, 16-3an-2019:
Forwarded to Derek
2

Derek Scheerer
From: Karen N <karennabity@gmail.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 6:35 AM
To: Derek Scheerer
Subject: Fwd: Zoning Change Z2018124
Forwarded message
From: Jamee Balvin <greatazestatesales@gmail.com >
Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: Zoning Change Z2018124
To: Karen N <karennabity@gmail.com>
I am for the change in the zoning on this 2.5 acre lot to RU-43 so it can become a buildable lot. Case
#Z2018124
Thank you, Jamee Balvin
28505 N 154th St
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
602-448-5653
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 16, 2019, at 6:27 PM, Karen N <karennabity@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am for the change in the zoning on this 2.5 acre lot to RU-43 so it can become a buildable lot. Case
#Z2018124

Derek Scheerer
From: Karen N <karennabity@gmail.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 6:36 AM
To: Derek Scheerer
Subject: Fwd: Building lot
Forwarded message
From: Jamee Balvin <greatazestatesales@gmail.corn>
Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:10 PM
Subject: Building lot
To: <karennabity@gmail.com>
I am for the change in the zoning on this 2.5 acre lot to RU-43 so it can become a buildable lot. Case
#Z2018124
Thank you,
Dale Balvin
28505 N 154th St
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
602-350-5733
Sent from my iPhone

Derek Scheerer
From: Brittany Morris <bmorris3610@gmaiLcom>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 2:17 PM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER; Karen N
Subject: Zoning Support for #Z2018124
I completely support the change in zoning to RU-43 on this lot to make it a buildable lot. In reference to Zoning #Z2018124.
Josh Morris
602-639-2269
26926 N. 138th St.
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
1