190035-CHANGE ORDER #1.PDF

MARICOPA COUNTY OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT SERVICES
ARTICLE 5 CONTRACT LOAD REQUEST
Please provide the following information with your request to have the Price Agreement loaded or modified in the Advantage
system. Omissions or incorrect information will result in the delay of the ability to use this contract for procurements or payments.
1
c New Contract ("' Contract Change Order\Extension\Modification\ Change Order #:
Document Code (MA5, CT5, SC5): MA5 Department Code: D730 Advantage Contract ID#: 190035
Select Contract Type: DBB C JOC C CMAR 6-I A/E C Simplified Construction Limited Scope
Contract Document Description: (max 60 ch aracters) : 301 ADMIN RESTACK
Effective Begin Date: 4/30/2019 Expiration/Revised Expiration Date: 12/31/2020
Thresholds/Not to Exceed Amount: $205,800.00
Change in Not to Exceed Amount: $1 '322'422 '00
Revised Not to Exceed Amount: $1,528,222.00
Accounting Information:
Advantage Sub Phase
3.10 - FY Fund Department Unit Appr. Unit Object Object Activity Program (optional) Amount
17
18
19 441 D470 470 MADR 9150 11 FACM MADRADMA CAPBLD 1322422
Vendor Number: VS0000003308 Vendor Name: Dekker Perich Sabatini Discount Information:% Days 3°
Vendor Number: Vendor Name: Discount Information:% Days
Vendor Number: Vendor Name: Discount Information:% Days
Vendor Number: Vendor Name: Discount Information:% Days
NIGP Code (Commodity Code): 90610
CHAD ELMS
Departmental Article 5 Procurement Officer:
Print Form Reset Form

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
Article 5 Delivery Order/Change Order Routing Rev.3/2019
D Original Delivery Order \ w Change Order# _0_1 ___ _ D Pre -Enc Validation # __ _
Project Manager: Brian Sheehan
Date: 4/24/19 Phone #: 6-0369
Vendor Name: Dekker Perich Sabatini Work Order#: 'I N/A
Contract#: 190035 Project : 3x-Stack y "!. \ o - \ e.- 0 9. l
Delivery Order#: "19*9628 Location Name: , 301 Admin
Project Name: 301 Re-Stack
Funding Source: D MM\ [!] CIP D Annual Funds D User Funds Amount: $1,322,422.00
FUND DEPT UNIT ACTIVITY APPR UNIT OBJ/SUB DEPT OBJ LOCATION PROGRAM *PHASE AMOUNT
, 441 ,. D470 , 4713 "FACM \MADR , 915011 ]M ^ CAPBLD $1,322,422.00
MAO;:..,.... '»:"Y'\
APPROVAL OR REVIEW REQUIRED DATE INITIAL
1. All information has been reviewed by Project ManaQer
2. FMD DesiQn & Construction Division ManaQer Approval
3. FMD Director Approval
4. Budget Analyst Review (*Phase to be completed by Budget Analyst)
5. Article 5 Procurement Review / Delivery Order Processing
-
6. Additional Special or Requested Review (Specify)
7. Article 5 Change Order Processing by OPS
8. Accounts Payable Processing
9. CFO Administration Processing
Delivery Order Total to Date: I $ $205,800 .f- / -W t{'J,J. tfXJ
Project Start Date: IN/A I Project End Date: IN/A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT SCOPE OR CHANGE ORDER:
Add architect and engineering services to contract for DD phase through CA and completion of the project.
Required Attachments: 1. Rate Sheet 2. Change Order Package 3. Project Information Sheet w/ Complete Scope
4. Vendor Proposal with Supporting Documentation 5. Schedule 6. Budget Summary Sheet

CHANGE ORDER
PROJECT: 301 Restack CHANGE ORDER NO.: 001
INITIATION DATE: April 24,2019
TO CONTRACTOR: Dekker Perich Sabatini CONTRACT NO.: 190035-ROQ
2375 E. Camelback Rd Suite 760
Phoenix, AZ 85016 CONTRACT DATE: January 9, 20 I 9
Add architeclUral and enginee1ing se1vices to existiog co1utact from the Design Development pha&-e
001 NIA through Contract Adminis1ratfon and projcc:1 completion. S 1,322,422.00
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER Sl,322,422.00
This Change Order shall constitute a finaJ seUJement of all mauers relating lo lbe change in the Work which is the subject of the Change Order,
including but not Limited to all direct or indirect eos1s associated with such clunge, any impact such change may have on unchanged Worif:, and any and
alJ adjuslments to the Contract Sum or the Contract Time. This Change Qrdq -:uoerct:dcs all prior reservations stated or implied
Not Valid Until Signed By Maricopa County, Architect (if applicable} and Contractor.
The original Co111rac1 Sum was $205,800.00
Net Change by previously authorized Change Orders 50.00
The Co11lrac:t Sum prior co this Change Order was $205,800.00
The Co11tract Sum will be (increased) fdee, eosedj (ouelilllJ:!:edj by this Change Order $1,322,422.00
The new Coutract Sum inc]uding this Change Order is $1,528,222.00
The Co11troct Time will be (i•ere..,edl Edme11,edl (unchanged) by ODays
The dote of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is NIA
The date of Final Completion as of the date of this Chang:: Order therefore is NIA
,., . JL
4/24/2019
Date
) George, AIA, LEED AP• Principal
,B
7'-.?.£·./7
Prc,jcct Manager Date FMDDin&t Date
MARICOPA COUNTY MARICOP COUNTY
iBY: _________________ _
CHAIRJvtAN, BOARD OF SUPER.VISORS DA'IB
ATTESTED:
CLERK OF THE BOARD DA'IB
APPRO'\'ED AS TO FORll:
DEPUTY COlJNTY ATTORNEY DATE

FlEKKER
April 23, 2019
PERICH
Brian Sheehan
Capital Project Manager SABATINI]
Maricopa County I Facilities Management Department
401 W Jefferson St I Phoenix, Arizona I 85003
BrianSheehanmail.maricopa.nov
Re: Maricopa County 301 Building Restack — revised fee proposal to include DD through CA
301 W. Jefferson St, Phoenix, AZ 85003
Dear Brian:
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini is pleased to submit this proposal for professional services for the above
referenced project. We understand the scope of the project is to relocate and right size various
departments within, as well as move several offsite departments into the existing 301 building. The main
lobby area on the first and second floors of the building will also be part of the renovation. Based upon the
information provided to D/P/S during the programming and scope meetings, renovation work will occur on
all floors of the 301 building. The deliverables for the project will be divided into two permit packages. The
first package, to be built by Maricopa County's Job-Order-Contractor, includes the renovation of the
basement (excluding the pharmacy) and the1Oth floor, for a combined total of approximately 38,700
square feet. The second package includes detailed phased construction documents for the remaining
nine floors for a combined total of approximately 205,000 square feet.
The scope of work for this proposal includes design development, construction documents, and
construction administration services. Detailed scope and fee amounts are listed below:
Our scope of work and related fees for the scope of the project are as follows:
I. Programming Confirmation / Scope Definition (under contract) Fee: $ 51,450.00
• Review existing programmatic information and confirm baseline space needs and overall metrics
for circulation, densities, ratios of open to closed space, personnel, support spaces and services.
• Identify amenities (Conference Rooms, Hub, Pantry, gym, etc.) and Services (IDF, building
support)
• Develop a detailed program to establish headcount and department specific support spaces, not
previously identified in the Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Program.
• Understand and assess the existing campus standards for finishes and furnishings.
• Work with MC/FMD interior designers to develop a "Kit of Parts" with modules and components to
be utilized in the planning strategies. Explore universal and benching solutions and the
development of flexible, hybrid solutions and new workplace alternatives. These will be used to
define the departmental boundaries.
• Explore appropriate workplace solutions by testing out different work types, i.e. focused, shared,
team and social as well as defining primary individual spaces vs. shared activity spaces.
o Explore alternative work solutions for mobile employees and telework options.
o Review tests prepared by MC/FMD and develop workplace solutions that support Maricopa
County's new direction on space utilization.
• Develop updated test fit plans with the appropriate solutions for the particular user groups
incorporating flexible planning to allow departments to grow or contract.
I. Programming Tasks - General
• Information gathering/exchange (floor plans, CAD, standards etc.)
• Visioning Session/Interviews — Project Partners and Project Advocate Representatives
• Synthesis of data collection
• Weekly project meetings
• Develop a Basis of Design for the project including interior construction and MEP systems
2375 E CAMELBACK RD, STE 760 602.842.5600 ARCHITECTURE / DESIGN / INSPIRATION
PHOENIX. AZ 85016 DPSDESIGN.ORG

II. Deliverables
• Updated Program Document
• Updated Test Fit Drawings
• Planning concepts for workspace
• Summary Basis of Design Report
• High level project construction budget based on the documents outlined above
Schematic Design (under contract) Fee: $154,350.00
Prepare basic architectural design documents that include:
• Comprehensive preliminary drawings in sufficient detail to illustrate the size and character of the
project as determined by programming requirements. Assume one major revision (more than
65%) and one minor revision (less than 50%) to schematic space plans.
• Lead two (2) project review meetings with the Maricopa County project team for development and
approval of the schematic design before proceeding with design development.
a Collaborate on a more detailed construction budget sufficient for MC/FMD to use in creating an
overall project budget.
Schematic Design — additional MEP Fee: $7,650.04
Scope increase for phase 5 tasks:
Design Development Fee: $373,680.05
• Develop the design to include finishes and design of specialty areas, such as lobby, feature walls,
custom millwork, conference rooms, and upgraded or specialty lighting.
• Create conceptual renderings of the space to convey the design intent of the specialty areas
• Use Maricopa County standard interior finishes and create material finish boards for use and
approval by the owner.
Construction Documents Fee: $518,367.90
• After final DD approval from MC/FMD, we will issue final plans to Mechanical, and Electrical
design disciplines to begin Construction Documents.
• Coordinate preliminary construction pricing with FMD based on 50% Construction documents.
Tentative issue date: TBD
• Throughout design and construction documents, periodic meetings will be held with MEP design
disciplines to coordinate aspects of the design. These meetings will be held on a weekly basis at
a minimum.
• Coordinate with FMD interior designers and furniture vendors to verify design and space
requirements.
• Complete construction documents and release to the county for plan check and permit. Tentative
issue date: TBD
• Assist FMD in administering either a CMAR selection process or General Contractor bidding
process and negotiating final Contracts for Construction
Construction Administration Fee: 377,724.34
• Contractor/RFI coordination
• Review shop drawings and equipment submittals
• Attend weekly job site progress meetings with the Owner and General Contractor.
• Review General Contractor submitted pay requests for accuracy to the work completed and/or
stored.
• Process Owner approved change orders.
• Perform final Punch List Walkthrough
• Issue Certificate of Substantial Completion.
237 U E CAMELBACK RD. STE 760 607.842.5600 ARCHITECTURE / DESIGN / INSPIRATION
PHOENIX, Al 06016 DPSDESIG 0.006

Structural engineering scope Fee: $included in above fees
• Structural engineering services related to moving and replacing the main stair from the first to the
second floor as part of the main lobby remodel
• Structural engineering design of the areas affected by removing the water feature and skylight
element in the lobby area
• Field verification and analysis of existing building structure in the area of the lobby remodel to
determine loading capacity for the new stair and other anticipated elements of the lobby remodel
Architectural Contract allowance Fee: $25,000.00
• Fee allowance to be utilized as the discretion of Maricopa County
Electrical metering allowance Fee: $15,000.00
• Fee allowance to be utilized for metering of approximately 24 main distribution panelboards.
Allowance assumes approximate cost of $550 per panel monitored.
Water flow test allowance Fee: $5,000.00
• Fee allowance to be utilized to obtain services to test the water flow at the facility.
F FE
D/P/S can provide assistance with selection and specification of new furnishing for the space. Once the
scope of services is determined we can provide a quote for these services.
Total cost of services - Fee: $1,528,222
Exclusions and assumptions: $1,528,222 - $205,800 (Prog. & SD's) = $1,322,422.00 TOTAL
Applicable taxes and reimbursable expenses are in addition to the fee quoted herein. Reimbursable
expenses are invoiced at cost and include printing, shipping, travel and per diem, any formal models,
renderings, presentation boards not included above, and application fees of any kind. All amounts unpaid
one month after the invoice date shall accrue interest at a rate of 1.5% per month, but not to exceed the
applicable maximum lawful interest rate in the jurisdiction in which the project is located.
Brian, thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. As always, feel free to call if you have any
questions about anything contained herein. If this proposal is acceptable, please sign below and we will
draft a formal AIA contract for the project.
Best Regards,
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
Robert C. George, AIA
Principal
2375 E CAMMACK RD, STE 760 602.842.5600 ARCHITECTURE / DESIGN / INSPIRATION
PHOENIX, A/ 85016 OPSOESIGN.ORG

M.Ise . *Totals o Total Oacirnbursable Reimbursable Reimbursable Example Example Example Construction 100% 50% Design Schematic Programming Basic Cost
of from Service Summary Reimbursable 03 02 01 Construction Construction Development Design 5eruiCeS Summary Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
Additional fee totals 402 401 Sheet
Services summary Expenses MininistratIon Documents Documents Confirination
and sheets
should
Reimbursable to roll Total Total
atom All Total !Total Total
Expenses summary Phases Factor Fenton for Fee
be shall total total Phase Phase Phase
In sheet 377,724.34 294,978.05 223,389.26 373,680.05 162.000.04 51,450.00
accordion. SO 50
with Mchitect
procedures chlteceOnterlors Dekker/Perich/Sabatini [ArchitecOntetiors Dehker/Perich/SabatIni Interiors \ ArchitecOnterlorS Ockker/Perich)Sabatinl
outlined 246,648.63 197,318.92 129,743.95 256,963.86 112,675.00 51,450.00
the In SO SO
Professional 'Consultants Subtotal Consultants Consultants Consultants Subtotal
SemIces
Contract 50 30
Geatech Consultant Geotc, Co,u Geotech Geotech Consultant
nt Maricopa
Name Name Name
1 1 1 County
S SO 301
'Estimator Consultant Estimator Consultant Estimator Estimator Consultant Adrnin
Name PiallIO Name restock
2 -
30 $0 COST
Consultant Consultant CMI CNII Consultant SUMMARY
Samoa Cameo 4 Name
DRAFT
50 SO
Landscape Landscape Landscape Landscape Dekker/Perich/Sa
Dekker/Perish/Sabatini Dekker/Petich/Sabatini
b stin
50 $0
Ittuotunal [Structural [Structural Structural
Delater/Perich/Sabatini Dekker/Perich/Sabatini Dakker/Perich/Sabatini
30 $0 12,98141 10,385.21 6,828.63 13524.41
r echaniol our Mechanical S&P Mechanical Mechanical B&P
05,055.44 48,352.92 47,983.10 57,159.58 27,408.26
so S0
rano! B&P Electrical B&P Electrical Electrical
52,438.74 38,891.60 38,833.58 46,032.20 21,916.78 444,702.20
SO 50
Consultant Security Consultant Mainly Secudty Consultant Proposal
Date
Names Names Names
30 SO
Other Consultant Other lt)th Other Consultant
Name e Name
10 10 10 4/23,
50 0 S 2109

Clerical PE Principal Civil Clerical PE Principal Geotech Clerical Drafter Spec Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Intern Intern Project Project Architect Architect Architect Principal Principal Principal Architect Fee
Designer/Drafter Fee Designer/Drafter Writer Design Design Designer Designer Designer Architect Architect Arcitect Manager Construction I II III I II III Summary Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
Fee Fee
Summary Intern Intern II III I II Sheet
Summary I II administrator Summary
Hourly Hourly Hourly
Rate Rate Rate
Phase Phase Phase
Totals $125 $125 $135 $150 Totals $60 $125 $135 $150 Totals $65 $70 $125 $65 $75 $80 $100 $130 $70 $90 $120 $150 $110 $100 $120 $150 $170 $210 $250
programming programming programming
hours hours hours
0.00 0.00 365.80 79.15 85.75 102.90 98.00
programming programming programming
Maricopa
fee fee $51,450.00 05,145 $10,290 515,435 $20.580 fee
SD SD SD County
Hours Hours Hours
0.00 0.00 942.47 36.67 241.45 281.69 225.35 107.31 301
SD SD SD Admin
Fee Fee Fee
$112,675.00 $5,634 $16,901 533,803 033,803 $22,535 restack
OD DD DD -
Hours Hours Hours Fee
0.00 0.00 1644.38 197.66 342.62 296.50 342.62 342.62 122.36
OD OD DD summary
Fee Fee Fee
$256,963.86 $12,848.19 $25,696.39 $38,544.58 $51,392.77 $51,392.77 $51,392.77 $25,696.39 sheet
50% 50% 50%
CD CD CD
Hours Hours Hours
0.00 0.00 842.62 99.80 259.49 149.70 172.99 129.74 30.89
50% 50% 50%
Cd Cd Cd
Fee Fee Fee
$129,743.95 $6,487.20 $19,461.59 $19,461.59 $32,435.99 $25,948.79 $19,461.59 $6,487.20
100% 100% 100%
CD CD CD
Hours Hours Hours
0.00 0.00 1281.49 151.78 394.64 227.68 263.09 197.32 46.98
100% 100% 100% Proposal
CD CD CD
Fee Fee Fee Date
$197,318.92 $9,865.95 $29,597.84 $29,597.84 $49,329.73 $39,463.78 $29,597.84 $9,865.95
0 Geotech 0 Architect
Civil CA CA CA
Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours
Total 0.00 Total 0,00 Total 1846.21 379.46 164.43 189.73 328.86 560.57 164.43 58.73 4/23/2019
CA CA CA
Fee Fee Fee
$994,800.37 $246,648.65 $24,664.86 $12,332.43 $24,664.86 $36,997.30 $49,329.73 $61,662.16 $24,664.86 $12,332.43

Estimate/CA CADS BIM designer Project Senior Engineer Engineer Project Senior PM Principal Clerical Engineering Engineering Structural Structural Structural Principal Principal Structural Clerical PE Principal Landscape
Tech services Mechanical Designer/Drafter I II Designer/Drafter
Designer Designer Intern Engineer Engineer Intern Intern Engineer Engineer Engineer Fee
Fee I II I II ill Fee
Summary Summary Summary
Hourly Phases Hourly Hourly
Rate 1-4 Rate Rate
Phase Phase Phase
Totals $110 $62 $100 $72 $88 $109 $85 $98 5115 $153 $131 $189 Totals $65 $90 $70 $90 $100 $120 $150 $170 $210 Totals $125 $125 $135 $150
programming programming programming
hours hours hours
0.00 0.00 0.00
programming programming programming
fee fee fee
SD SD SD
Hours Hours Hours
230.71 0.00 30.40 0.00 74.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.31 0.00 0.00
SD SD SD
Fee Fee Fee
$23,153.00 $1,659 55.713 $3,711 $7,070
50 50 SO SO 50 SO 50 SO
DO DD DD
Hours Hours Hours
484.00 192.00 180.00 112.00 131.49 52.59 45.08 33.81 3.22 0.00
DD DD DD
Fee Fee Fee
$51,521.64 $14,822 $19,600 $17,099 $13,524.41 $4,733.54 $4,057.32 $4,057.32 $676.22
50% 50% 50%
CD CD CD
Hours Hours Hours
406.00 168.00 154.00 84.00 66.39 26.56 22.76 17.07 1.63 0.00
50% 50% 50%
Cd Cd Cd
Fee Fee Fee
$42,562.94 $12,970 $16,769 $12,824 $6,828.63 52,390.02 $2,048.59 $2,048.59 $341.43
100% 100% 100%
CD CD CD
Hours Hours Hours
410.00 176.00 152.00 82.00 100.97 40.39 34.62 25.96 2.47 0.00
Phases 100% 100% 100%
1-4 CD CD CD
Fee Fee Fee
Mechanical $42,657.42 $13,587 $16,551 $12,519 Structural $10,385.21 $3,634.82 $3,115.56 $3,115.56 $519.26 Landscape
0
CA CA CA
Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours
Total 428.00 34.00 0.00 198.00 196.00 Total 126.21 50.48 43.27 32.45 3.09 Total 0.00
CA CA CA
Fee Fee Fee
$213,233.92 $53,338.92 $1,855 $21,560 $29,923 $43,719.76 $12,981.51 $4,543.53 $3,894.45 $3,894.45 5649.08
$0

admin CADD BIM designer Project Senior Engineer Engineer Project Senior PM Principal CADD BIM designer Project Senior Engineer Engineer Project Senior PM Principal admin CADD BIM designer Project Senior Engineer Engineer Project Senior PM Principal Electrical
Tech services Electrical Estimate/CA Tech services Mechanical Estimate/CA Tech services
Designer Designer Intern Engineer Engineer Designer Designer Intern Engineer Engineer Designer Designer Intern Engineer Engineer
Fee Fee
Fee
Summary Summary
Summary
Hourly Phase Hourly Phase Hourly Phases
Rate 5 Rate 5 Rate 1-4
Phase Phase
$60 $62 $100 $72 $88 $120 $85 $98 $115 $135 $160 $185 Totals $110 $62 $100 $72 $88 $120 $85 $08 $115 $135 $160 $185 Totals $110 $60 $62 $100 $72 $88 $120 $85 $98 $115 $135 $160 $195
programming programming programming
hours hours hours
0.00 0.00
programming programming programming
fee fee fee
50 SD SO
Hours Hours Hours
8.00 17,50 13.00 36.00 6.00 18.00 12,00 130.65 000 56.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.00
SD SD SD
Fee Fee Fee
$437 $1,250 $1,709 $4,255.26 $463 $1,960 $1,832 $18,522.00 $0 $3,091 SO $O $O $0 $4,355 00 50 $0 $0 $10,576
DD DO DO
Hours Hours Hours
2.00 16.00 20,00 18.00 50.00 16.00 18.00 16.00 514.00 8.00 188.00 188.00 130.00
DD DO DD
Fee Fee Fee
$119 $873 $1,428 $2,366 $5,637.94 $1,235 $1,960 $2,443 $41,246.04 $476 $10,259 $13,423 $17,087
50% 50% 50%
CD CD CD
Hours Hours Hours
2.00 16.00 20.00 17.00 48.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 434.00 4.00 164.00 168.00 96.00 2.00
50% 50% 50%
Cd Cd Cd
Fee Fee Fee
$119 $873 $1,428 $2,234 $5,420.16 $1,235 $1,742 $2,443 $34,178.86 $238 $8,949 $11,995 $12,618 $378
100% 100% 100%
CD CD CD
Hours Hours Hours
2.00 16.00 18.00 18.00 50.00 16.00 16.00 18.00 420.00 4.00 156.00 156.00 92.00 12.00
100% Phase 100% Phases 100%
CD 5 CD CD
Fee Fee 1-4 Fee
$119 $873 $1,285 $2,366 Mechanical $5,725.50 $1,235 $1,742 02,748 Electrical $34,248.24 $238 $8,513 $11,138 $12,092 $2,266
CA CA CA
Hours Fee Hours Fee Hours
2.00 6.00 42.00 48.00 Total 96.00 6.00 40.00 50.00 Total 454.16 20.00 40.00 208.16 186.00
CA CA CA
Fee Fee Fee
$119 $327 $2,999 $6,309 $33,355.38 $12,316.52 $327 $4,356 $7,634 $170,879.42 $42,684.28 $1,191 $2,183 $14,862 $24,448

PE PE
Clerical Estimator Principal Estimator Clerical Principal Security lEstimate/CA
Designer/Drafter Designer/Drafter
Fee Fee
Summa Summa
Hourly Hourly
Rate Rate
Phase Phase Phase
Totals $125 $125 $125 $135 $150 Totals $125 $125 $135 $150 Totals
programming programming
hours hours
0.00 0.00 0.00
programming programming
fee fee
SO SD
Hours Hours
0.00 0.00 38.50
SD SD
Fee Fee
$3,394.78
DD DD
Hours Hours
0.00 0.00 56.00
DD OD
Fee Fee
$4,786.16
50% 50%
CD CD
Hours Hours
0.00 0.00 55.00
SO% 50%
Cd Cd
Fee Fee
$4,654.72
100% 100%
CD CD
Hours Hours
0.00 54.00
100% 100%
CD CD Phase
Fee Fee 5
Secu $4,643.36
Estimator Electrical
CA ity CA
Fee Hours Fee Hours Fee
Total Total Total 98.00
CA CA
Fee Fee
$27,233.48 $9,754.46
_

BRIDGE RS
S. Alma School Rd, Suite 300
Mesa, AZ 85210
main 602.996.6399 www.bpce.com
April 23, 2019
Mr. Robert George, AIA
Principal / Architect
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
2375 E Camelback Rd, Suite 760
Phoenix, AZ 85016
SUBJECT: MARICOPA COUNTY — 301 BUILDING RESTACK
PROPOSAL FOR MPE ENGINEERING SERVICES — REV 3
Dear Bobby:
We are pleased to have the opportunity to participate with Dekker/Perich/Sabatini on the Maricopa
County 301 Building Restack Project as the Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Consultant. The
Project is located in Phoenix, AZ.
Please provide a copy of your prime agreement to B&P as soon as it is available so we can be sure we
clearly understand all contractual requirements. This proposal is based on our current understanding of
the project scope of service requirements as summarized in Attachment No. 2 for the Mechanical and
Electrical Consulting Engineering. Our proposal may be amended if your prime agreement is inconsistent
with our understanding of the project scope of service requirements.
Attachment No. 1 summarizes our project Mechanical and Electrical Engineering fee proposal request for
'Basic Design Services' and provides a fee breakdown by project phase.
We propose a Lump Sum fee proposal for Schematic Design based upon 260,515 square feet of building
renovation area and a design schedule duration of 8 weeks.
Should the project design schedule be delayed for any reason, for longer than ninety (90) days, an
additional service fee will be required. This may include services to assess implications of construction
costs, possible resulting design changes, possible code changes, and to re-organize the Design Team to
re-familiarize the team with the project.
In the event that we have either neglected to include services which you believe will be necessary, or we
have included work not required, please let me know and we can adjust our fee accordingly. Similarly, if
you believe that our proposal is not reasonable for your project scope and budget, we would be happy to
meet and negotiate scope and costs in order to meet your project requirements.
We propose that invoicing for engineering services during Design and Construction Phases be submitted
monthly. Invoices will be due and payable not less than ten (10) days after receipt of payment from
Owner.
Reimbursable expenses not included in our basic fee are to include expenses incurred by Bridgers &
Paxton in the interest of the project and are identified as follows:
• Expenses for reproduction, handling of drawings, specifications and other documents, other than
normally required for coordination and progress review between Owner, Architect, and
Consultants.
• Expenses in connection with travel and per diem outside the Phoenix Metropolitan area.
INNOVATIVEDEPENDABLESOLUTIONS

April 23, 2019
Mr. Robert George, AIA / Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
RE: MARICOPA COUNTY 301 BUILDING RESTACK Page - 2
• Testing and measurement is excluded and will be provided by Maricopa County via JOG or
CMAR.
• Applicable fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the project.
Reimbursable expenses if applicable will be billed at cost.
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini will furnish B&P with a PDF electronic of the schematic design submittals with
Owner review and approval of each submittal. These sets will include all discipline drawings,
specifications, narratives, and cost estimates for the purpose of review and coordination and our design
team's use in coordinating the mechanical, plumbing, fire protection, and electrical system design.
Drawings shall be in printed form.
Our proposal is based upon receipt of a complete set of record drawings for architectural, structural, civil,
mechanical, plumbing, fire protection, electrical, and special systems.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. We look forward to the opportunity to work with
you on this project. I am available at your convenience to discuss and answer any questions you may
have regarding our proposal. Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by signing and returning
one copy of this Agreement for our files.
Respectfully,
M:\ PROPOSAL\2018\ 18P-115 MARICOPA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BLDG RE-STACKWEEMCF 301 BUILDING RESTACK
FEE - REV 1.DOCX
copy: Accounting
APPROVED: DATE:
for Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
BRIDGERS&PAXTON 1839 S Alma School Rd, Suite 300, Mesa, AZ 85210 main 602.996.6399 www.bpce.com

ATTACHMENT NO. 1
BRIDGERS & PAXTON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
SUMMARY OF MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL FEE PROPOSAL
Maricopa County 301 Building Restack
Phoenix, AZ
Refer to Attached hourly task breakout following this page.
PHASE 1-4 FEE SUMMARY
1. MEP Basic Services Fee (SD, DD, CD, & CA) $384,113.34
Basic Services Fee Breakdown by Phase:
Schematic Design $41,675.00
Design Development $92,767.68
50% Construction Documents $76,741.80
100% Construction Documents $76,905.66
Construction Administration $96,023.20
Phase 5 Fee Summary
2. MEP Basic Services Fee (SD, DD, CD, & CA) $60,588.86
Basic Services Fee Breakdown by Phase:
Schematic Design $7,650.04
Design Development $10,424.10
50% Construction Documents $10,075.88
100% Construction Documents $10,369.86
Construction Administration $22,071.98
GRAND TOTAL MEP FEE $444,702.20
BRIDGERS WOO ()1 I1 1839 S Alma School Rd, Suite 300, Mesa, AZ 85210 main 602.996.6399 www.bpce.com

ATTACHMENT NO. 2
BRIDGERS & PAXTON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
SCOPE OF WORK
MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Our general understanding of the project mechanical and electrical requirements are summarized herein:
The overall scope of the project is to relocate and right size various departments within the existing 301
building as well as move several offsite departments into the building. All floors of the building (10 floors
above grade, 1 below) will be affected and design and construction performed in 5 phases. The basic
scope included phases 1 through 4 (CMAR deliverable) includes renovation of floors 1 through 9. A
separate design package, phase 5, and will include the basement and 10'h floor. Based on the
information provided by D/P/S at the kick off meeting on 4/1/2019 there is roughly 260,515 square feet of
area being renovated within the building.
Schematic Design will Include:
• Comprehensive preliminary drawings to illustrate the size and character of the project as
determined by programming requirements. Assume one major revision (more than 65%) and
one minor revision (less than 50%) to schematic space plans.
• Attend two (2) project review meetings with the Maricopa County project team for development
and approval of the schematic design before proceeding with design development.
• MEP scope will include site investigation, review programming criteria developed by D/P/S,
review MEP design requirements for HVAC, fire protection, controls, lighting, receptacle,
distribution and fire alarm, prepare schematic plans showing 'typical' layouts with preliminary
equipment cutsheets for Maricopa County approval, Design team meetings.
• Prepare an energy efficient study to comply with all applicable mechanical and electrical codes
and Maricopa County Standards.
Design Development :
• Work from the Schematic Design drawings and consider input from the CMAR and adjust plans
accordingly.
• Provide outline specifications.
• Submit updated plans to the CMAR for ongoing bidding reviews.
• Attend presentation meeting to CMAR and FMD. FMD shall provide written approval prior to
release of any information.
• Provide a list of Value Engineering options should the CMAR estimate exceed the Owner's
budget.
50% Construction Documents:
• After Design Development drawings are approved Design will begin on the 50% CD phase.
• Review value engineering options presented by the CMAR.
• Submit complete 50% CD documents.
• Submit completed MEP specifications utilizing most recent CSI specifications.
• Provide complete index sheet
• MCF to provide approval of 50% CD set prior to moving forward to next phase.
100% Construction Documents:
• After 50% CD drawings are approved Design will begin on the 100% CD phase.
• Review value engineering options presented by the CMAR.
• Submit complete 100% CD documents.
• Submit completed MEP specifications utilizing most recent CSI specifications.
• Provide complete index sheet
• Respond to plan review comments, if any.
BRIDGERS&PAXTON 1839 S Alma School Rd, Suite 300, Mesa, AZ 85210 main 602.996.6399 www.bpce.com

April 23, 2019
Mr. Robert George, AIA / Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
RE: MARICOPA COUNTY 301 BUILDING RESTACK Page - 2
Mechanical Scope will include:
• Assessment of HVAC systems and piping during the Schematic phase.
• Replace all existing HVAC air and chilled water piping distribution systems (i.e., AHUs, VAV
boxes with electric reheat coils, low pressure ductwork, air devices, piping, temperature control
devices, etc...) in order to meet new building heat / cooling demands and ventilation
requirements.
• Replace existing building stairwell pressurization fan system and associated controls interface
with Fire Alarm system.
• Replace existing HVAC BAS/FMS with new HVAC system controls.
• Replace all existing general exhaust fans, FCUs, and associated ductwork / air devices.
• Field verification on existing chiller plant system (i.e., chillers, Cooling Towers, CHW and CW
distribution pumps, and piping distribution) will be required to determine if the existing chilled
water system can support the new cooling demand and/or experiencing with operational related.
Plumbing scope will include:
• Assessment of main piping distribution during the Schematic phase.
• Replace all toilets and sinks for all Men's and Women's rooms.
• Replace vent piping to main pipe run, domestic water to new sinks and toilets, waste piping to be
replaced to main pipe run. Main pipe run may be replaced if determined in bad condition during
the initial assessment.
• Coordinate condensate drain piping for new indoor HVAC units.
• Coordinate piping for equipment (refrigerators, coolers, water coolers, etc).
Electrical Scope will include:
• Assessment of main distribution (SES, Distribution boards) during the schematic phase.
• Replace all panelboards on each level. Wil also assume that main feeder runs from the panels to
distribution boards will be replaced.
• Provide new LED lighting throughout.
• Provide new device layout and power for systems furniture and new offices.
• Provide new special systems (data, security) layouts and coordinate with MCF OET for
requirements.
• New OET closets will be added. Provide all power for new security, IT, grounding, power.
• Update existing OET closets for power.
I. Included in Basic Engineering Services are the following:
A. Participation with the project team in the schematic design document phase to determine
project mechanical, plumbing, electrical, fire protection, and special systems design
requirements and recommended design approach with Owner review and approval of
each phase.
B. Preparation of mechanical and electrical schematic drawings and table of contents for
Division 22, 23, 26, 27 and 28 Specifications for the building heating, ventilating, air
conditioning systems (HVAC), plumbing, fire protection (performance specification),
electrical power (normal and emergency), lighting, fire alarm and other electrical special
systems, including voice, audio/visual, data/LAN, security, CATV, as required. Note:
Special system design will include coordination with Owner's Representative for system
building infrastructure (cable tray, empty, conduits, etc.), but DOES NOT include detailed
special system design.
C. Control system design will include schematic control diagrams, sequence of operation,
and Division 23 specification section and coordination with Owner's Representative for
EMCS interface.
BRIDGERSR, PAX 101\1 1839 S Alma School Rd, Suite 300, Mesa, AZ 85210 main 602.996.6399 www.bpce.com

April 23, 2019
Mr. Robert George, AIA / Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
RE: MARIOOPA COUNTY 301 BUILDING RESTACK Page - 3
D. Consultation and coordination with the project construction cost estimator and/or CMAR.
E. Construction Administration including attendance at pre-construction conference,
Response to RFI's, and shop drawing review and site visits for observation of
construction work. All observations will be provided with a punch list report. Current fee
estimated visits based on $610.58 for mechanical and $525.76 for electrical
representation.
F. Review of project closeout documents prepared by the Contractor, including test and
balance reports and O&M manuals.
G. Preparation of MEP record drawings prepared by the Contractor.
Clarifications & Exclusions
A. Not anticipated as being required, or not requested, and therefore not included in our
Basic or Special Services proposal are as listed below:
1. MEP Scope for the Programming Phase.
2. On-site civil utility design beyond 5'-0" from the building, including domestic
water, fire main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, natural gas and all associated
meters, backflow preventers, vaults, structures and enclosures (to be provided by
Civil Engineer to extent as may be necessary).
3. Preparation of detailed estimates of probable MEP construction costs for the
proposed work.
4. Participation in the Owner's operating and maintenance training conducted by the
Contractor.
5. Design of off-site utility system improvements or expansion including connections
to utilities beyond the property line and/or within the public right-of-way (to be
provided by Civil Engineer to the extent as may be necessary).
6. Design of building wet pipe fire sprinkler system including detailed piping
drawings, head layouts, and hydraulic calculations, unless additional Special
Design Services" fee is approved.
7. Demolition of existing onsite building, structure and utility infrastructure systems.
8. Preparation of detailed fire alarm calculations.
9. Detailed short circuit or coordination studies and measurement of existing
electrical equipment and power distribution.
10. Testing & Measurement of the existing building HVAC air distribution or electrical
service as may be required to determine the existing capacities and adequacy to
serve the proposed tenant improvement area.
11. Design, coordination, and/or cooperation with any asbestos or hazardous waste
related activities.
BRIDGERS&PAXTON 1839 S Alma School Rd, Suite 300, Mesa, AZ 85210 main 602.996.6399 www.bpce.com

April 23, 2019
Mr. Robert George, AIA / Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
RE: MARICOPA COUNTY 301 BUILDING RESTACK Page —4
12. Special on-site observation/inspection which may be required by the City of
Phoenix Building Department or County or State Building Department/Officials.
13. Energy analysis and/or life cycle cost studies or system alternatives.
14. International Energy Code calculations for confirmation of total building
performance compliance.
15. Mechanical and/or Electrical coordination studies based upon equipment
supplied by the Contractor.
16. Preparation of construction documents of multiple (more than one (1)) bidding
packages.
17. Providing services in connection with evaluating substitutions proposed by the
Contractor and making subsequent revisions to the drawings, specifications, and
other documents resulting from the substitutions.
18. Plotting drawings on Mylar for any submission such as final construction
documents, record sets, etc. If required, then the cost of Mylar shall be
submitted as a reimbursable expense.
19. Signing and sealing other consultants design drawings, specifications, etc.
20. Work typically included as Additional Services_ in The Standard AIA Agreement
Between Architect and Consultants, unless otherwise included herein.
21. Preparation of reports or studies for additional work typically included as
"Additional Services" in The Standard AIA Agreement Between Architect and
Consultants.
Additional provisions associated with the MPE & FP engineering services, include the
following:
A. The Owner or Architect will provide B&P with complete information concerning the project
requirements for our work and shall furnish as applicable:
1. Criteria, constraints and definitions applicable to this Project.
2. A list of codes, including edition dates and local ordinances, supplements and
revisions applicable to this project.
3. A water flow test made on hydrants near the site to indicate static water
pressure, fire flow rate available above normal consumption, and the residual
(flowing) pressure during fire flow. Our proposal includes an estimated
allowance to hire a vendor to conduct the flow test. The Value is included in the
Architectural allowance summary.
4. Electronic CADD files of architectural floor plans compatible with AutoCAD 2018
format including vendor equipment shop drawings for our use during design.
CADD files shall be accompanied by two (2) sets of half-size prints. Updated
files and blueline prints shall be furnished as architectural changes are made and
these changes shall be identified on the prints.
BRIDGERS&PAXTON 1839 S Alma School Rd, Suite 300, Mesa, AZ 85210 main 602.996.6399 www.bpce.com

April 23, 2019
Mr. Robert George, AIA / Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
RE: MARICOPA COUNTY 301 BUILDING RESTACK Page - 5
5. Design and construction standards which we are to follow in the preparation of
construction documents.
6. A set of architectural, structural, interior and other progress PDF electronic sets
as they are needed.
7. One electronic copy (PDF format) of the programming and schematic documents
including addenda and change orders as they are issued.
The above items shall be furnished at no expense to B&P and we shall be entitled to rely upon
the accuracy thereof.
B. Inform us of special requirements of the project which will affect our work.
IV. Conditions of Agreement (Between DPS and B&P)
A. Any incentives clauses for the design team or contractor shall be disclosed at the time
they are established. The design team shall be fully informed of such clauses and given
the opportunity to participate if success of meeting the incentive clause requires
additional effort on our part.
B. Should the project design schedule be delayed for any reason, for longer than 90 days,
an additional service fee will be required. This may include services to assess
implications of construction costs, possible resulting design changes, possible code
changes, and to reorganize the design team to refamiliarize the team with the project.
C. To the fullest extent permitted by law, and not withstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, the total liability, in the aggregate, of the Consultant and the Consultant's
officers, directors, partners, employees and subconsultants, and any of them, to the
Client and anyone claiming by or through the Client, for any and all claims, losses, costs
or damages, including attorneys' fees and costs and expert-witness fees and costs of any
nature whatsoever or claims expenses resulting from or in any way related to the Project
or the Agreement from any cause or causes shall not exceed the total compensation
received by the Consultant under this Agreement, or the total amount of $50,000,
whichever is greater. It is intended that this limitation apply to any all liability or cause of
action however alleged or arising, unless otherwise prohibited by law.
D. The premise of this agreement is that the prime consultant and all other project sub-
consultants are adequately insured for professional liability and are therefore liable for
their portion of the work.
E. Payment to Bridgers & Paxton shall not be withheld, postponed or made contingent on
the construction, completion or success of the project or upon receipt by the Client of
offsetting reimbursement or credit from other parties whom may have caused additional
services or expenses. No withholdings, deductions, or offsets shall be made from
Bridgers & Paxton's compensation for any reason unless Bridgers & Paxton has been
found legally liable for such amounts.
F. Consult with us regarding proposed changes which may affect our work, as early as
feasible upon consideration of the change. Bridgers & Paxton shall be notified of all
architectural changes in writing.
G. The Architect shall maintain a Change Order Log of design errors and omissions and
shall forward a copy of the Change Order Log and the remaining available Contingency
Fund. The Architect and Owner agree that the contingency fund shall only be used for
BRIDGERS&PAXION 1839 S Alma School Rd, Suite 300, Mesa, AZ 85210 main 602.996.6399 www.bpce.com

April 23, 2019
Mr. Robert George, AIA / Dekker/Perich/Sabatini
RE: MARICOPA COUNTY 301 BUILDING RESTACK Page — 6
design errors and omissions and conformance conditions. The Contingency Fund shall
not be used for Owner requested changes.
V. Project Credits
A. All publicity where credits are given will include the name of Bridgers & Paxton
Consulting Engineers as the Mechanical and Electrical Consulting Engineers.
B. Allow us to access, at no cost, at least two (2) photographic images of the completed
project for our marketing purposes.
END SCOPE
BRIDGERS&PAXTON 1839 S Alma School Rd, Suite 300, Mesa, AZ 85210 main 602.996.6399 www.bpce.com