FINAL_MMRP_MASTERPLANUPDATE_2019_COMPILED_CHAPTERS.PDF

McDowell Mountain
Regional Park
Master Plan Update
2019-2039



Acknowledgements
This master plan update was a collaborative process that involved the guidance and expertise of many.
The Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department would like to thank the Planning Team who
committed their time to meetings and document review; likewise to the Stakeholder Advisory Group
(Detailed in Appendix A) who took time out of their schedules to provide their invaluable input.
Planning Team
R.J. Cardin, Director
Jennifer Waller, Operations Manager
Teresa Retterbush, East Side Superintendent
Shayla Gunn, Park Supervisor
Ken Vonderscher, Planning and Development Manager
Allen Ockenfels, Trail Development Manager
Emily Miller, Contract Administrator
Juanita Armstrong, Natural Resource Specialist
Lauren Bromley, Park Planner
This Master Plan update was made possible by the contributions and guidance of the following:
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Commission
Bill Gates, Chairman, District 3 Thomas Rhoades, District 2, Chair
Jack Sellers, District 1 Dr. Robert Branch, District 4, Vice Chair
Steve Chucri, District 2 Denise Merdon, District 1
Clint L. Hickman, District 4 Eric Mears, District 3
Steve Gallardo, District 5 Isabel Chavez, District 5
Megha Budruk, Member At Large
Jack Stapley, Member At Large
The Department would also like to thank its agency partners at the Maricopa County Department of
Transportation, Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Bureau of Land
Management – Lower Sonoran Field Office, City of Scottsdale, and the Town of Fountain Hills for their
input and guidance.
The Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department would also like to thank the tireless efforts of
the park staff and volunteers, without whom the park could not operate. Additional gratitude is
extended to all the youth group participants and public meeting attendees who offered their valuable
comments and suggestions.

__________________________________________________________ Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 - Introduction
1.1 Project Background .............................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Vision, Mission, and Theme ................................................................................................................. 1-2
Chapter 2 - Master Plan Process
2.1 Purpose of the Master Plan ................................................................................................................. 2-1
2.2 Previous Planning Efforts ..................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.3 Plan Amendments or Updates ............................................................................................................. 2-2
2.4 Agency Participation Program ............................................................................................................. 2-3
2.5 Public Participation Program ............................................................................................................... 2-4
2.6 Planning Constraints ............................................................................................................................ 2-8
Chapter 3 - Resource Analysis
3.1 General Project Setting ........................................................................................................................ 3-1
3.2 History of Area ..................................................................................................................................... 3-2
3.3 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................... 3-7
3.4 Native Americal Consultation .............................................................................................................. 3-8
3.5 Natural Resources ................................................................................................................................ 3-9
3.6 Physiography and Climate .................................................................................................................. 3-11
3.7 Water Resources ................................................................................................................................ 3-12
3.8 Earth Resources ................................................................................................................................ 3-16
3.9 Biological Resources ........................................................................................................................... 3-19
3.10 Visual Resources .............................................................................................................................. 3-33
3.11 Recreation Resources ..................................................................................................................... 3-33
3.12 Land Use ......................................................................................................................................... 3-36
3.13 Facilities and Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 3-41
3.14 Socioeconomics ................................................................................................................................ 3-47
3.15 Visitation and Tourism Trends ......................................................................................................... 3-50
3.16 Park Use and Visitor Preferences ..................................................................................................... 3-53
3.17 Local Recreation, Needs, and Opportunities Public Safety ............................................................. 3-55
3.18 Park Administration and Special Functions ..................................................................................... 3-56
3.19 Public Safety ..................................................................................................................................... 3-59
3.20 Park Finances ................................................................................................................................... 3-60
Chapter 4 - Roads and Access
4.1 Existing Roads, Access, and Parking ..................................................................................................... 4-1
4.2 Proposed or Planned Roads, Access, and Parking ............................................................................... 4-5

__________________________________________________________ Table of Contents
Chapter 5 - Trails
5.1 Existing Trails ........................................................................................................................................ 5-2
5.2 Proposed Community Trails/Trailheads ............................................................................................... 5-6
5.3 Trail Use ............................................................................................................................................... 5-6
5.4 Trail Rating ........................................................................................................................................... 5-7
Chapter 6 - Management Zoning
6.1 Methodology for Determining Management Zones ............................................................................ 6-1
6.2 Description of Management Zones ...................................................................................................... 6-2
6.3 Area Descriptions that Influence Park Zoning ..................................................................................... 6-3
Chapter 7 - Park Improvement Projects
7.1 Issues and Constraints Analysis ........................................................................................................... 7-1
7.2 Recommended Park Improvements .................................................................................................... 7-2
List of Tables
Table 1-1: Themes and Mandates ............................................................................................................. 1-3
Table 2-1: Delivery and View Rates of GovDelivery system ...................................................................... 2-8
Table 3-1: Stream Flow Monitoring ......................................................................................................... 3-15
Table 3-2: Federal Register Listed Species .............................................................................................. 3-22
Table 3-3: Special Status Species ............................................................................................................. 3-24
Table 3-4: Species of Greatest Conservation Need ................................................................................. 3-25
Table 3-5: Invasive Plant Species ............................................................................................................. 3-29
Table 3-6: Plant Species Listed (Federal/State) ....................................................................................... 3-32
Table 3-7: Species of Economic and Recreation Importance .................................................................. 3-35
Table 3-8: Distribution of Land Ownership .............................................................................................. 3-36
Table 3-9: Jurisdictions ............................................................................................................................. 3-37
Table 3-10: Covered Picnic Ramadas ....................................................................................................... 3-43
Table 3-11: Population and Park Visitor Characteristics .......................................................................... 3-47
Table 3-12: Total Resident Population ..................................................................................................... 3-49
Table 3-13: Employment and Education .................................................................................................. 3-49
Table 3-14: Economic Impact Based on Visitor Spending and Operating Expenses ................................ 3-55
Table 3-15: Local Recreation Opportunities ............................................................................................ 3-55
Table 3-16: Volunteer Value by Fiscal Year .............................................................................................. 3-58
Table 3-17: Partnerships .......................................................................................................................... 3-59
Table 3-18: MCSO Statistics ..................................................................................................................... 3-60
Table 3-19: Summary of Annual Expenditures ........................................................................................ 3-64
Table 3-20: Donations .............................................................................................................................. 3-65
Table 4-1: Roadway Jurisdiction and Functional Class ............................................................................... 4-1
Table 4-2: Park Roads and Parking ............................................................................................................. 4-2
Table 4-3: Park Roadway Classifications .................................................................................................... 4-2
Table 4-4: Park Roadway Design Matrix .................................................................................................... 4-3
Table 4-5: Existing Park Roadway Maintenance Status ............................................................................. 4-4
Table 4-6: Drive Time/Acres Analysis for MMRP ....................................................................................... 4-5
Table 5-1: Designated Trails ....................................................................................................................... 5-3
Table 5-2: Competitive Track Events and Participants .............................................................................. 5-5

__________________________________________________________ Table of Contents
Table 5-3: Trail Uses ................................................................................................................................... 5-7
Table 5-4: Trail Rating Guide ...................................................................................................................... 5-7
Table 6-1: Management Zone and Acreage ............................................................................................... 6-1
Table 6-2: Park Management Zones .......................................................................................................... 6-2
Table 7-1: Issues, Constraints, and Analysis .............................................................................................. 7-2
Table 7-2: Existing Features and Recommended Improvements .............................................................. 7-6
List of Figures
Figure 2-1: News Release February 5, 2018 ............................................................................................... 2-7
Figure 2-2: Facebook post February 5, 2018 ............................................................................................. 2-7
Figure 2-3: Facebook post October 10, 2018 ............................................................................................. 2-8
Figure 3-1: Park and Metro-area................................................................................................................ 3-2
Figure 3-2: Fort McDowell in Frontier Days, Arizona ................................................................................. 3-3
Figure 3-3: General George Stoneman ...................................................................................................... 3-4
Figure 3-4: Stoneman Road........................................................................................................................ 3-5
Figure 3-5: Pemberton (P-Bar) Ranch ........................................................................................................ 3-5
Figure 3-6: Dixie Mine ................................................................................................................................ 3-6
Figure 3-7: Historical Sites ......................................................................................................................... 3-6
Figure 3-8: Petroglyphs in McDowell ......................................................................................................... 3-8
Figure 3-9: Average Annual Temperature and Precipitation ................................................................... 3-12
Figure 3-10: Major washes (Section 404) ................................................................................................ 3-14
Figure 3-11: Floodway and Floodplain ..................................................................................................... 3-15
Figure 3-12: Geology ................................................................................................................................ 3-17
Figure 3-13: Marcus Landslide ................................................................................................................. 3-18
Figure 3-14: Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 3-19
Figure 3-15: 1995 Rio Fire Damage inside McDowell HabiMap™ ............................................................ 3-20
Figure 3-16: Environmental Hazards ........................................................................................................ 3-20
Figure 3-17: Biotic Communities .............................................................................................................. 3-21
Figure 3-18: Wildlife Linkages .................................................................................................................. 3-27
Figure 3-19: Land Ownership ................................................................................................................... 3-37
Figure 3-20: Existing Land Use ................................................................................................................. 3-39
Figure 3-21: Existing Park Facilities .......................................................................................................... 3-41
Figure 3-22: RV Back-in space .................................................................................................................. 3-39
Figure 3-23: Dispersed Camping .............................................................................................................. 3-44
Figure 3-24: Four Peaks Staging Area ...................................................................................................... 3-44
Figure 3-25: Campground Playground Equipment .................................................................................. 3-45
Figure 3-26: Populations Growth Via Census Tract ................................................................................. 3-48
Figure 3-27: Visitor Residency .................................................................................................................. 3-51
Figure 3-28: Visitation By Fiscal Year ....................................................................................................... 3-51
Figure 3-29: Visitation Per Fiscal Month Within Fiscal Year .................................................................... 3-52
Figure 3-30: Actual And Forecasted Visitation Per Fiscal Year ................................................................ 3-52
Figure 3-31: Recreation Opportunities .................................................................................................... 3-56
Figure 3-32: Revenue Per Fiscal Year ....................................................................................................... 3-61
Figure 3-33: Revenue By Month In FY18 .................................................................................................. 3-62
Figure 3-34: Annual Camping Revenue .................................................................................................... 3-62
Figure 3-35: Facility Rentals ..................................................................................................................... 3-63
Figure 3-36: Annual Pass Revenue ........................................................................................................... 3-63
Figure 3-37: Daily Pass Entries ................................................................................................................. 3-64

__________________________________________________________ Table of Contents
Figure 4-1: Drive Time Analysis .................................................................................................................. 4-5
Figure 4-2: Existing and Planned Future Access Points .............................................................................. 4-7
Figure 5-1: Trails Crew Hard At Work ........................................................................................................ 5-1
Figure 5-2: Identified Trails From Plan Updates ........................................................................................ 5-2
Figure 5-3: Future Trails Identified ............................................................................................................ 5-3
Figure 5-4: McDowell Competitive Track ................................................................................................... 5-5
Figure 6-1: Development Zones ................................................................................................................. 6-3
Figure 7-1: Recommended Park Improvements (North Area Close-Up) ................................................... 7-4
Figure 7-2: Recommended Park Improvements (Campground And Nature Center) ................................ 7-4
Figure 7-3: Recommended Park Improvements (Competitive Track and Four Peaks Staging Area)......... 7-5
List of Appendices
Appendix A Public Participation
Appendix B Water Resources
Appendix C Earth Resources
Appendix D Biological Resources
Appendix E Cultural Resources
Appendix F Land Use
Appendix G Facilities and Infrastructure
Appendix H Roads
Appendix I Trails

Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations
Term Definition
ADA American’s with Disabilities Act
ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
ADOT Arizona Department of Transportation
ADWR Arizona Department of Water Resources
AMA Active Management Area
AMSL Above Mean Sea Level
APS Arizona Public Service Company
ASU Arizona State University
ARS Arizona Revised Statutes
ASLD Arizona State Land Department
AST Aboveground Storage Tank
AZGFD Arizona Game and Fish Department
AZGS Arizona Geological Survey
BOR (or Reclamation) Bureau of Reclamation
BOS Board of Supervisors
BLM Bureau of Land Management
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
City City of Scottsdale
CO Carbon monoxide
County Maricopa County
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESA Endangered Species Act
°F Degrees Fahrenheit
FCD Flood Control District of Maricopa County
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FTE Fulltime Equivalent (employee)
FY Fiscal Year
GIS Geographic Information System
GPS Geographic Positioning System
HDMS Heritage Data Management System
HUC Hydraulic Unit Code
HURF Highway User Revenue Fund
I- Interstate (number)
IBA Important Bird Area
IGA Intergovernmental Agreement
IP Implementation Plan
LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Development
MAG Maricopa Association of Governments
MCAQD Maricopa County Air Quality Depeartment
MCDOT Maricopa County Department of Transportation
MCPRD (or Department) Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department
MCSO Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office
MDP Master Development Plan

Term Definition
mm Millimeter
MMRP (or Park) McDowell Mountain Regional Park
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MP Master Plan (update)
MPA Municipal Planning Area
NOx Nitrogen Oxide
OHV Off-Highway Vehicle
PM Particulate Matter
PRSG/S Park Road System Guidelines/Standards
R&PP Recreation and Public Purposes Act
RR Restroom
RU- Rural Residential
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
RV Recreational Vehicle
SAG Stakeholder Advisory Group
SDS Safety Data Sheets
SERI Species of Economic and Recreational Importance
SES Services Entrance Section
SGCN Species of Greatest Conservation Need
SHPO State Historic Preservation Office
SR- State Route (number)
SSMP 2009 Strategic System Master Plan (for MCPRD)
SRP Salt River Project
SUP Special Use Permit
SWAP State Wildlife Action Plan
SWCC Southwest Wildlife Conservation Center
Town Town of Fountain Hills
TMM Trails Management Manual
Tribe Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation
TSP Transportation System Plan
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
VOC Volatile Organic Compounds
VRM Visual Resource Management

___________________________________________________________________ Introduction
Chapter This vision, and national chapter mission, 1 introduces parks. – and Introduction Regional the park the concept theme(s). parks are of The a located regional regional outside park, park the general fills metropolitan a void overview between area of the city, (although project, state,
with driving buffer rapid from distance development, urban to encroachment. the population this is becoming for which less it and was less planned the case), and but attempts within to a reasonable maintain a
A city provides bike regional trappings, riding, opportunities park walking, with is defined enough horseback for as passive space a natural, riding, and and facilities unspoiled picnicking, active recreational for area camping, day providing and activities overnight nature its visitors study (e.g. use. hiking, and A an regional escape sightseeing) mountain from park
that have archaeological wilderness allow unique its preserve, visitors topography, interest. refuge, to A unwind regional ecosystem and open and park immerse space, features, may offering also themselves scenery, provide its visitor(s) and in a nature. blend hold a sense special of A regional unspoiled of remoteness. historical park nature, may or
Its of carefully and development, the typically natural patterned includes environment phased and a nature designed in over while center, time, to conform still is picnic geared providing tables to toward the and landscape, some facilities ramadas, comforts. avoiding that campsites, encourage All a crowded development a trail enjoyment system, feeling, is
and Therefore, and enjoyment adequate rivers, of the native these support regional vegetation natural facilities park resources and system (parking, wildlife serves by restrooms, providing in their to preserve natural well concessions, planned the state, mountains, while etc.). and appropriate also canyons, encouraging facilities. washes the
McDowell regional ride, being. and parks explore; Mountain or conservation allowing Regional us Park to areas, reconnect (MMRP and offers with or Park), the nature opportunity is and one restoring of twelve to hike, our Maricopa bike, sense horseback of County well-
1.1 In Management 1958, Project approximately (BLM) Background to Maricopa 18,273 County acres of (County) public land via the was Recreation leased by & the Public Bureau Purposes of Land Act
1-1

(R&PP). through nearly ___________________________________________________________________ 21,099 The further County acres. land received On acquisition May the 25, between first 1967, land the 1964 patent Parks and for and 1987, MMRP Recreation the in Park 1963, Advisory grew and to subsequently, Introduction Commission encompass
(Commission) This MDP demand will have have be never the often unanimously first come dictated update into to recommended when fruition, the MDP and where while since the its at development Master adoption the same Development in time, occurs. 1967. public Many This Plan update components use (MDP) and to for changing the MMRP. of MDP the
is Park. and direction to updated bring This in plan those order as is needed. disparities based to protect on This a the back 20-year plan Park’s into is meant outlook, resources. alignment, to and be and flexible, should to steer be while referred future also to providing development on a regular long-term of basis the
MMRP largest foothills twelve is parks, park extending a component at two 21,099 of east which acres. of to the the are Maricopa The Rio conservation Park Verde features County River. areas, regional The rugged and County’s mountain park is comprised system, regional terrain and of park more and is to system gently date than the includes 120,000 sloping third
acres recreational encircling and educational the Phoenix opportunities metropolitan for area. residents The and regional visitors park alike. system provides
1.2 This Recreation backcountry plan Vision, is Department meant and Mission, historic/cultural to align (MCPRD with and the Theme interests or vision Department). and automatically mission The of provides the Park’s Maricopa unique a basic County direction combination Parks for and the of
Park’s and marketing planning themes. and development, and is subsequently reflected in the Park’s operational
1.2.1 This plan Vision aligns and with Mission the vision and mission set forth by the Department and are as follows:
“Our programs, and create vision inspire life-long is to an connect positive appreciation people memories.” with for the nature Sonoran through Desert regional and natural parks, open trails spaces, and
“Our trails, users mission, and programs, advocates.” through services responsible and experiences stewardship, that is energize to provide visitors the highest and create quality life-long parks,
1.2.2 The settlement Park 1967 sits Themes today. MDP of Fort for The McDowell MMRP area has noted in a 1865, rich that history the which Park was of possesses Native-American situated a directly unique settlement, historical southeast past of fur where trapping with the the
along The 1967 the Rio MDP Verde called River, for the mining least near amount the hills, of development and cattle ranching that could throughout provide the the fullest area.
1-2

amount Additionally, that acknowledge ___________________________________________________________________ of enjoyment the Department the Parks of the rich has wilderness cattle established ranching and similar beauty history operational that and adventurous is so abundant and marketing frontier in Introduction this life themes area. that
drew Operational so many Theme people out west.
The Recreation Park been MMRP identified as an 2009 “Adventure Master in Strategic Table Plan and 1-1. Update System outdoor (MP) Master recreation” is Plan aligned (SSMP) Park. with As that the such, recommends Maricopa its priority County maintaining mandates Parks have and the
Maricopa Operational Priority Mandates County Theme Park McDowell Adventure Mountain and Outdoor Regional Recreation Park Park
1 and 2 opportunities. – – Preserve Pursue limited limited public the natural access. development setting and to enhance environmental the quality aspects and diversity of the park of by recreational heavily restricted use
3 park Table – Strategically system. 1-1: Themes develop and Mandates facilities that increase the revenue generation capacity of the park and
Source: 197. Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Strategic System Master Plan, June 2009, page
Until mandates, programmatic a new any department-wide change) proposed should Park support strategic improvement one plan or more is implemented project of these (i.e. mandates. that capital changes development these priority or
Marketing Complimentary after park’s the themes the spirit 2009 Theme were or SSMP essence. to used its was operational to The adopted, provide SSMP theme, a each sought subtle, park each to yet developed develop park distinct also consistency differentiation carries a “theme” a marketing that among between best the theme. represents parks, the Shortly parks. while the
The number geology, “mountain themes of archaeology Park biking”. were values vetted This and were emphasis through others); identified community however, on during mountain this the focus process key biking groups feature (e.g. was and historical identified carried Park staff aspects, forward for meetings. MMRP camping, in was the A
Department Although the promote impressive the this Marketing MMRP theme natural has Plan by and many providing as cultural its amenities marketing assets additional to of offer theme.1 the from or Park, improved mountain there are biking facilities. ample to opportunities picnicking, Any proposed with to
programming should also keep these themes at the forefront.
1 43. Themes are further outlined in MCPRD Connecting People with Nature Marketing Plan (12/6/11 revision), page
1-3

___________________________________________________________________ Introduction
{This page intentionally left blank.}
1-4

__________________________________________________________________________________ Master Plan Process
Chapter This including conducted chapter public during 2 outlines – Master the participation, the project. purpose Plan This planning Process of is the the MP third issues, and MP reviews update and a the the recreation process Department for activity updating has undertaken evaluation the MP,
in (2016-2036) recent years, as its and template. utilizes the Estrella Mountain Regional Park Master Plan Update
The team, group, completed planning key and Department the simultaneously process general involved staff public but members, over numerous involved the partner’s course tasks, gathering of and advisory a year relied or and analyzing group, on a input half. stakeholder from different Some the tasks planning advisory sets were of
information. Each task was tracked on a timeline to provide direction to the planning team,
2.1 The identify information, purpose Purpose community and of this of identify needs planning the other Master and effort concerns, potential is Plan to characterize update recreational the 1967 and opportunities evaluate MDP to environmental reflect suitable the for current inclusion resource use,
in The and protection the guide ultimate Park. development of purpose the Park’s of priorities resources. developing that The a will MP MP provide is provides to outline for a both conceptual the the long-range public’s planning vision enjoyment framework for the and Park the for
establishing “Quality County those Park priorities. System” It per will the also 2014 assist update the Park of the with SSMP. upholding the standards for a
2.2 Several Departments management Previous existing of SSMP, the plans Planning park which played system; guides an Efforts important it the also decision-making provides role in recommendations shaping for this future MP. development on Specifically, how the Park and the
system additional for term each projects might as steps well and be as to goals improved. a identify timeline to further the for The predominate implementation. enhance ‘Connecting or feature(s) maintain People The annual of Park with each resources. Nature business park and Marketing plans promote outline Plan’ a “theme” short- took
2-1

__________________________________________________________________________________ Master Plan Process
This • • plan McDowell Maricopa consulted County Mountain the following Regional Regional list Trail Park of System County Master Plan plans Development (2004) and other Plan documents: (1967)
• • • • McDowell Parks 2012-2013 Cultural and resource Trail Recreation Visitor Amendment surveys Study Strategic Final (various) (2008) Report System (by Master ASU) Plan (and (2009 previous and versions) 2014 update)
• • • Moving Maricopa City of Scottsdale Forward County in Vision General a Time 2030 Plan of Change, Comprehensive 2035 Maricopa Plan County (draft) Strategic Plan (2011-2015)
• • • • Rio Scottsdale McDowell Town Verde of Fountain Foothills Sonoran Trails System Preserve Hills Area Master Plan General – Cultural Plan Plan Resource 2020 and Master Land Use Plan Analysis and Statistical
Report.
2.3 This adherence should Plan plan be revised should to Amendments this and plan be reviewed updated and to evaluate every or annually Updates 20 implementation years by Park to take staff the progress. to changing insure their At needs a minimum, knowledge of the County this of plan and and
the If amendment notification, any community major and may and/or into all be consideration. sudden potential needed. changes changes Major take should amendments place be prior reported to to the this to 20-year plan senior may mark, management require an update public and or
planning Management of the nature land; and/or that staff Zone; dramatically for a proposed adjacent consideration. alter action land the use that Park; Major changes is not any amendments within or other development the action scope may that of that would the include impacts MP. permanently changes the Park; to affect acts the
Minor as limited such well as amendments to; as insertion other updating social or should demographic removal media be outlets. of posted annual and Examples for other reports a 30-day statistical of (such minor comment information; as amendments business period updates and on include the marketing Parks to but appendices webpage are plans, not
etc.); issues. trash management new receptacles, The or addition and updated planning etc. of resource non Minor staff permanent for amendments information; consideration. site amenities and/or or updates to such correct should as grammatical picnic be reported tables, or grills, formatting to senior posts,
2-2

__________________________________________________________________________________ Master Plan Process
2.4 Department Agency Participation Participation Program
The senior throughout information, MP level update the consult management. planning was partners, developed process Department stakeholders internally in order staff by to and Department’s define worked the public, the individually scope develop planning of the and and staff, MP, analyze met Park review as draft staff, a project group Park and
improvement projects, and to finalize the MP update.
Parks Department Commission public to and attend Recreation and planning and invited to staff make Advisory them provided comments; to provide Commission periodic however, feedback. updates (Commission) no These members and/or meetings of presentations the were public open provided for to the the
feedback dates: during these meetings. Presentations or updates were given on the following
• • • • November March September November 20, 2018 14, 13, 18, 2017 2018 2018
• • January March 19, 15, 2019 2019 (Park tour)
The Board Commission of Supervisors provided during their the March approval 19, 2019 and recommendations meeting commission to meeting. the Maricopa County
Maricopa This BOS the signature meetings plan was County page are presented also in Board the open front to of the to of Supervisors the BOS this public. for document. their The (BOS) approval BOS approved at the this April plan 24, as 2019 acknowledged BOS meeting. on
Partners The contractual in public the planning planning and Participation stakeholder obligations team process. identified meetings with, These or several engaged interests at the agencies start in and serious of obligations the or planning discussions other parties were process. with identified that as the interested and Park disclosed has partners either at
Small the County County Town group Sherriff’s Department of Fountain meetings Office of Hills were (MCSO); Transportation (Town); held with Maricopa Arizona partners (MCDOT); County Game such and Flood and as: Fish the Southwest Control Department City of District Scottsdale Wildlife (AZGFD); (FCD); Conservation (Scottsdale); Maricopa Maricopa
Center monthly center at (SWCC). with the Park. the Additionally, Department The Department halfway to discuss also through invited the the inclusion the planning partners, of process a as new well wildlife SWCC as other started facility/visitor agencies, meeting to
2-3

attend comments. __________________________________________________________________________________ group Partner stakeholder meetings meetings were held and at public the following open house locations: meetings to Master provide Plan additional Process
• • McDowell Cave o o Creek January April Mountain Regional 4, 2018 4, 2018 Regional Park – Visitor Park Center – Nature Classroom Center
The via patents. the majority R&PP As o a of July result, process Park 11, the 2018 land and Department within must the remain MMRP consulted consistent boundary with with the was BLM R&PP acquired and requirements received by Maricopa their and written County land
approval Planning regarding which staff this also MP is found update. sought at Email the input front from invitations of the the MP. adjacent for stakeholder Fort McDowell meetings Yavapai and public Nation meetings (Tribe)
were sent to the Tribe throughout the planning process.
2.5 A of much public the Public public planning participation and Participation process, stakeholder program identify feedback was recreational Program designed as possible. by needs planning The and various staff resource in order components concerns, to inform and are the solicit included public as
and Arizona ASU asked detailed periodically questions State in Appendix University by performs interviewers A. visitor (ASU) conducting use Park surveys Visitor in-park on Study behalf surveys. of the Visitors Department. are also asked Visitors if they are
would responses Survey the MP. responses like to to questions. participate for the This years in allows 2012-2013 a longer the Department take-home were taken to survey into identify consideration and and provide track trends when more developing over detailed time.
Stakeholders Another list out and of to other stakeholders a component broader interested audience or of parties. special the public than The interest just participation stakeholders the groups. partners, program The met and stakeholders two includes was times establishing between neighboring group January is a meant comprehensive jurisdictions 2018 to reach and
May is included 2018 at in the Appendix Rio Verde A. Community Center; a list of participants invited to the meetings
• • January May 24, 23, 2018 2018 (1pm-3pm) (10:30am-12:30pm)
2-4

The assisted during group’s __________________________________________________________________________________ the in the meetings comments development reflected and of concerns a the general recommended concern were integrated regarding Park improvements. into a larger the updated planning Comments Master visitor process Plan received Process center, and
the Briefly, inclusion those comments of SWCC, potential included: upgrades to Park infrastructure, and revenue generation.
• • • Develop Event Develop area an a bike upgrades additional skills park. including campground competitive loop and track primitive expansion. camping areas.
• Add additional a cabin revenue rental streams. option to capture “glamping” trends and create
Public The three cards, public public the Open Park was meetings. House website, notified Meetings Additional of letters the planning or comments emails, process verbal were and discussions captured their feedback through with citizens, surveys was sought and or comment through through
social Comment opinions. public’s media desires Each forms platforms. meeting and were preferences provided was followed at for each by Park a public thirty-day improvements. meeting open in comment order Also, during to period gather the to the collect thirty-day public’s the
periods, available poster for Park boards visitors were and left community on display members in the Park’s to provide nature additional center with feedback. comment forms
Public MMRP Park. on information, the In north resides Meeting an effort and and in-between One resources to south capture side two distributed feedback of the major Park from communities; at to both reduce both meetings communities, the both attendee’s were north-northeast identical. public drive meetings time. and Presentations, were south hosted of the
The Town pad second comments first of of Fountain of the these two and meetings two Hills twelve meetings Community (12) was sticky held was Center on held notes February on where were February 22, collected ten 2018 (10) 20, (5:30pm-7:30pm) people 2018 at the (5:30pm-7:30pm) end signed of the in, meeting. eight at the (8) at Tonto The flip the
Verde three (3) Community sticky notes Center were where collected. five (5) people signed in, three (3) flip pad comments and
Eighty-eight February emails, the proposed and 20 all (88) partnership to Park March individual social 22, with media 2018 responses a SWCC outlets. via Survey were as part Comments received Monkey of the visitor received during (an online center, the indicate open survey and comment strong strong service), support support period direct for for of
additional respondents mileage, walking recreation expressed trails and that their camping are desire separate for opportunities, from upgraded biking trail/trailhead including trails, American’s rustic signage style with cabins. showing Disabilities Other trail
2-5

Act skills (ADA) park __________________________________________________________________________________ with paved a flow paths, trail. additional educational programing, a nature play Master area, Plan and Process a bike
Public The Fountain comment second Meeting Hills cards public Community Two were meeting received Center was during held where the November meeting nineteen 5, and (19) 2018 are people summarized (5pm-7pm) signed at in. below. the Twelve Town Planning (12) of
and throughout conversations park Park and flow staff the and trail, presented presentation map additional mark-ups the draft multi-use and included proposed afterward. trails, additional Park and Topics improvements implementation competitive that were and track of raised answered “Dark loops, during Sky” a bike questions lighting verbal skills
principles One period social hundred media of November for outlets. sixty-six the Park. 6 (166) through individual December responses 6, 2018 via were Survey received Monkey, during direct the open emails, comment and all
The amenities. additional trails public were Trails, trail commonly was asked options, again, mentioned what were trail they the maintenance subject liked (i.e. to most install of most and and water comments trailhead what stations they improvements. – would including throughout change a general the from Mountain Park, desire proposed build bike for a
skills received structures restoration park, included: or flow of ramadas Pemberton trail additional and to the expand Pond picnic shower and the tables, facilities two Ranch updated event house in staging the interpretive tent area, areas). campground park panels Briefly, wide on area, hunting other the added North comments ban, shade Trail, and
additional Project Website RV camping sites.
Information interested • https://www.maricopacountyparks.net/park-locator/mcdowell-mountain- parties was posted apprised on of the the Park’s planning “Projects” process. webpage to keep the public and other
regional-park/park-information/park-projects/
Media A prior well general as to and media each press Social meeting outlets release Media via and was Coverage Twitter was issued made and to available Facebook. announce on public These the County news meeting and outlets dates Department published at least websites thirty-days (or posted as
online) the following press releases:
2-6

County __________________________________________________________________________________ news: Master Plan Process
Facebook1 dates. comment Figure 2-1: Comments News periods and Release Twitter2 to were February the extent were also 5, 2018 retrieved also possible utilized and from as considered reminders these social with for media the all other public sources comments. open during house the meeting open
1 2 Figure McDowell’s MCPRD 2-2: Twitter Facebook Facebook page: post, https://twitter.com/mcparks page: February https://www.facebook.com/McDowellMtnPark 5, 2018
2-7

The distribute parties County __________________________________________________________________________________ were newsletters/bulletins encouraged newsletter delivery to register and system, for updates the GovDelivery subscription to its email-based or service GovDocs, in order subscribers. was Master to also receive Plan utilized Interested Process updates to
or be other used to notifications test the system’s related effectiveness, to the Park. whereas The GovDelivery other platforms system may offers not analytics (Table 2-1). that can
Figure 2-3: Facebook post, October 10, 2018
Table Date February October Sent 2-1: 15, 12, Delivery 2018 2018 and Recipients 1,472 5,029 View Rates of GovDelivery Delivery 98.8% 99% Rate system Total 252 954 Opens
2.6 Factors issues aging Planning facilities both that inside affected and Constraints and infrastructure, the outside planning of the changing process Park. included The demographics, Park existing is facing and conditions, a variety changing of trends, recreational challenges and other from use
activities uses development; Fountain as the and Hills primary patterns this planning includes activity). (for code example, newer or MMRP ordinance residential the also shift to faces away developers include pressures from neighborhood picnicking that from are required towards adjacent parks, by increased trails, land the Town use and/or trail and of
open neighborhoods available space to them into provides previously. their development. its residents These topics with The new are inclusion presented options of for in outdoor how Chapter they recreational 3. recreate that spaces were not in
The planning maintain/rehabilitate diverse team planning and can issues existing be identified grouped facilities; during into education/interpretation; five scoping major for categories: the project develop were administrative; discussed new facilities; by and the
resource protection.
2-8

__________________________________________________________________________________ Master Plan Process
Additionally, planned need the Park to be improvements. and balanced are tight always budgets with of Improvement “fiscal concern. and responsibility.” staffing The priorities budget are will Budgets the and dictate typical desires and the constraints staffing for number immediate will of impact when staff improvements employed addressing all areas of at
the The concerns Park Park and while improvement the supporting number recommendations, of the Park Park’s improvement priority as mandates projects detailed that and in can Chapter themes. be successfully 7, will address completed. these
2-9

__________________________________________________________________________________ Master Plan Process
{This page intentionally left blank.}
2-10

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Chapter The could inventory resource be affected of 3 Park analysis – Resource by resources for any the additional Analysis MP occurred includes development from natural, March historical, and 2018 operation through and cultural of October the resources Park. 2018. Limited Data that
collection resources investigations. included in the area, reviewing aerial photo previous interpretation, reports and GIS documents analysis, pertaining agency contacts, to the Park and field and
The amounts Master total Park land Plan1 to consists area. less (SSMP) than of provides 1.4% 21,099 of acres, the a guideline total of acreage which for approximately keeping that is developed. developed 293 The areas acres 2009 to are 10% Strategic developed. or less System of This the
3.1 At date, located just General and over northeast is located 21,099 Project of within the acres, Phoenix Sections MMRP Setting metropolitan is 1 the - 36 third of Township area largest as shown regional 04 North, on park Figure Range in Maricopa 3-1. 06 East. The County Park to is
The Park maricopacountyparks@mail.maricopa.gov. Park’s may mailing be address contacted is 16300 by McDowell telephone Although Mountain (602) subject Park 506-2930 to Drive, change, MMRP, or the via AZ current 85268. email Park The at
operating hours2 Park Sun-Thu: are: Hours 6:00am – 8:00pm Nature Summer Center (May 7th Hours –October 8th)
Fri-Sat: 365 days 6:00am a year – 10:00pm Mon-Sat: Sundays: 8:00am Closed – 3:00pm
Winter Sunday (October thru Saturday: 9th - May 8am 6th) – 4pm
1 2 Maricopa Source: Park County website Parks as and of January Recreation, 28, 2019. 2009 Check Strategic website System for Master the most Plan, current p112. information.
3-1

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure 3-1: McDowell Mountain Regional Park
3.2 Prior encountered new crops History to the and year Roman technologies; of 1821, Area3 Catholic when however missionaries Mexico these broke who indigenous from attempted Spain, peoples indigenous to convert were largely them peoples and left occasionally introduced alone. The
Treaty treaty, south 1854), of all the of the lands Guadalupe border Gila north River between Hidalgo of remained the the Gila was United River with signed Mexico. were States in part 1848, Later, and of Mexico ending the through United was the the States war moved Gadsden with territory south Mexico. Purchase to and its With all present (1853- lands this
day United location, States. placing the land that is now MMRP within the New Mexico territory of the
In official all Confederate 1861, of present possession as the flag day nation by of Arizona signature the was “Territory embroiled south of then of of the in Arizona” Confederate the 34th Civil parallel. for War, the President Colonel This Confederacy action John Jefferson put R. – an Baylor the area Davis Park of that in Texas under included 1862. took the In
1863, 3 A Historical President Survey of Abraham McDowell Mountain Lincoln signed Regional a Park, bill 1963, creating Fireman, the Bert. new Territory of Arizona; the
3-2

legislation Arizona ________________________________________________________________ territories remained at law their at current the end boundaries. of the war and effectively divided the New Resource Mexico Analysis and
Fort which order south McDowell to of occurred chase Prescott, down and around Arizona. the and surrounding 1863. punish Woolsey A a citizen band area and of army his was Tonto men indirectly led Apaches by marched King established who S. south Woolsey had stolen down by was a cattle the series established Hassayampa and of events, horses in
River citizen later eventually become and army east become crossed Camp past McDowell a what the secondary Agua is now eighteen Fria supply MMRP River, (18) route and continuing months made known a later. temporary as on Stoneman The towards trail camp these the Trail at Verde the men connecting site blazed Valley. that would would Camp This
McDowell Camp McDowell) McDowell with (Figure Fort (later Whipple changed 3-2) near to Prescott. Fort was
established military homesteaders the region. protection It in was 1865 from about in raiding to order this miners same to tribes provide time and in
that created American the Tonto the the Apache Indians. United reservation raids States By the had government system late ceased. 1880s, for As
the settler from was outpost abandoned Fort protection, McDowell was by no 1890. longer troops and The the needed withdrew area outpost that for Figure 3-2: Fort McDowell in Frontier Days, Arizona
previously was designated was occupied as reservation by the lands Fort for McDowell, the Fort as McDowell well as additional Yavapai Nation acreage in 1903. to the south,
Homesteading, Cattle establishment the continual roamed presence the of Ranching Fort lands McDowell, of in the and and military around Herding that livestock and MMRP a steady as raising early demand as gained the for 1870s. a beef, foothold It stock wasn’t in raising the until region. became after With the a
viable the Glenn perimeter Moor, source and of of income Henry the Park. Pemberton. for The the area. most A notable few homesteads homesteaders were included located Clayton within proximity Whitehead, of
The quit-claim that land earliest this that is is deed likely documented now dated when incorporated 1917 Henry reference for Pemberton a into water to the any source Park. homesteaded type known Several of permanent as years Cottonwood his ranch later, residence (Pemberton Pemberton Springs. in the It Ranch area Ranch) is thought was was on a
renamed From acres, 1935 165 P-Bar head to the Ranch of cattle, 1950s, and and the in 1935 nearly P-Bar it a Ranch was dozen purchased was mining a viable claims by Lee ranch in Barkdoll the consisting Dixie and Mining Delsie of over District. Journigan. 25,000 By
3-3

the had early several ________________________________________________________________ 1950s other beef owners prices before started eventually to fall. In being 1954, incorporated Delsie decided into to MMRP. sell P-Bar Resource ranch, Analysis which
Mining The produce original McDowell Claims 1967 anything MP Mountain and states of Mineral significance. Range that Rights no lured historical The prospectors 1963 records Fireman in were search Survey found of of mineral for McDowell the wealth, Dixie as Mine well but did as in not the the
archives 1996 credence support and metalworking for to absorbed the mineral Arizona into wealth by Mining native the in BLM). Districts this peoples area Several living by and, the older nearby. likewise, United reports States archaeologist state Bureau that of testimony Mines geologists (abolished does give not no in
3.2.1 The remnants range Park features, Historical found has a as throughout long well Resources and as the rich the Dixie history Park Mine. in of the human form of exploration petroglyphs, with artifacts, cultural cattle and tanks historical and
Stoneman A shipping Whipple trail now in and Road known Prescott, supply as Stoneman route Arizona extending to Road/Trail Fort through McDowell was utilized the near Park as present-day from a military Fort
Fountain MMRP State Trail’ (I-2733.SHPO). Historic from Hills northwest between Preservation The to 1870 the National Office and southeast 1890. Society (SHPO) and The - has as Daughters Stoneman the been ‘Historic recognized Road of the bisects Stoneman American by the the
Revolution Stoneman Trail (DAR) Military (Grand Route Canyon (Stoneman Chapter) Road) first on commemorated October 25, 1997. the
The Stoneman 3), scout who route a route on Road is October considered that was would 1, named 1870, a be ‘Ghost after suitable took Trail’ General a small as due a George wagon-bearing band to the of Stoneman minimal military military traces (Figure troops left. road 3- to connecting Figure George 3-3: Stoneman General Camp
McDowell The route McDowell road between that northwest was General vacated Camp to McDowell Stoneman Cave by the Creek, U.S. created and Black Military. Fort later Canyon, Whipple. The became U.S. and (Figure Fort Government an important Whipple 3.4). By established in supply Prescott, April and 1890, the Arizona. courier Fort Fort
McDowell Indian Reservation by 1903, now known as Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation4.
4 Daughters Commission, Exploring of the and the Stoneman American the Scottsdale Road, Revolution, October Historical MMRP, 1870 Society. – Sonoran October Conservancy, 2010. Civil War Scottsdale Roundtable Historic – Scottsdale Preservation Chapter,
3-4

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Pemberton Figure 3-4: Ranch5 Stoneman Road
The raising between State first Land Homestead homestead 1919 Department, and 1922. Act in the by records This area Clayton claim within also Whitehead show was the relinquished current a homesteader on Park all of boundary in Section filed 1926, under however was 22, T2N, the filed name according under R6E, Pemberton sometime the to Stock the
on 1920s time ‘Pemberton’. the that to SW1/4, “Pink” the The ranch of Cole the Ranch name who SW changed ¼ passed changed of the the hands same from ranch section6. several Pemberton on to more his The son to Ranch times “P-“(P Bill changed Cole and Bar) in was 1926. ‘P’ hands sub-divided. presumably It in was the at early The this for
northern part approximately SHPOs of National MMRP portion one in Register of 1964. mile the ranch of south Remnants Historic which along Places of includes the the Pemberton as Pemberton (AZ the U: original 6323). Trail. Ranch Pemberton Pemberton (Figure Homestead 3-5) Ranch can is be listed became found on
Figure 3-5: Pemberton (P-Bar) Ranch (Above)
Historical 5 6 Arizona ‘P-Bar’ A Historical Historical Ranch Society. Survey Photo Foundation, May of Album, McDowell 2003 Fountain July Mountain 1963. Hills and Regional Lower Park, Verde Maricopa Valley ‘River County of Parks Time’ and Museum. Recreation Lower Department, Verde Valley
3-5

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Dixie Originally the corner Dixie Mine of Mine known MMRP) (Figure (located as 3-6) had the Red near a small Mountain the start southwest Mine, as a
copper large of Bureau Arizona enough mine; of Mines. Mining however, to warrant Two districts the recording (2) mine clay by never the on deposit grew a U.S. list
mining Tiger of T4N, Enterprises R6E. claims were within registered Section in 16 1961 and 22 as
MMRP Native Figure historical American has 3-7 features a depicts long and of history the some Euromerican Park. of of use the by peoples. known both Figure 3-6: Dixie Mine
Figure 3-7: Historical Sites
3-6

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
3.3 This complete may section Cultural bring historical offers context Resources a record. brief to history Park-related The historical of the Park naming names and and/or conventions. surrounding events area, While mentioned but a by comprehensive no in this means, section is a
archeological surveys kept archaeological on have file at been inventory sites the completed Park and has the or not Department need and been a to number completed protect offices. of these records on However, the cultural are entire available. due assets, Park, to the project these These sensitive reports inventories or site nature are specific not are of
available Historical survey’s (5) regional performed to information the Parks general (including in the public. contained Park MMRP). as well in this as the section 1963 Archaeological came from various Resource cultural report resource for five
3.3.1 Cultural remnants the complex Pre-History remains of geomorphological the prehistoric may of Area7 be encountered archaeological conditions in throughout culture the Park, called it the is possible Hohokam. Park that for However, discoveries may represent because dating the to of
the Fort of the earlier McDowell area Paleoindian may Yavapai also be and present. Nation Archaic lands, cultures consequently to be found. evidence Further, of the the Apache Park is and adjacent Yavapai to use the
Water Hohokam goods. reasons, was/is Traces the relied Hohokam a of critical heavily irrigation element society on canals irrigation declined to have those for been rapidly who its agriculture found live in in along the this early in the desert order Rio fifteenth region. Verde to produce century River. Unsurprisingly, food For (1450 and unknown trade A.D.) the
leaving The major a former Park arroyos many Hohokam contains of within the village a agricultural number the Park with of Boundaries. three centers recorded (3) abandoned. or archeological Among four (4) them, rooms. one sites Additional (AZ: predominantly U: 5:10) sites is within thought found the along to Park be
include throughout include temporary prehistoric both camps the sherd Park of Hohokam and (Figure people small agricultural 3-8). participating villages. Archaeological Remnants sites, in hunting and sites geometric of and pottery within gathering and the sherds zoomorphic boundaries activities, possibly petroglyphs of represent while the Park the
villages indicate at least seasonal use of the area for wild plant crop harvesting.
7 McDowell Master Development Plan, 1963, Scott, William T.
3-7

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Petroglyphs behind dark Figure “desert 3-8: on Petroglyphs rock(s) are varnish” found by in McDowell ancient in or many patina8 peoples. places on throughout exposed The rocks rocks the are Park. and covered boulders. Petroglyphs by a paper-thin This are varnish renderings coating is what left of
allowed Ranger MMRP culturally Nature occasionally native sensitive Center peoples sites. leads and to front-country leave educational their etching hikes areas. to Staff messages some and petroglyphs the behind. Arizona The Site located Park’s Stewards closer Interpretive monitor to the
3.4 Planning regarding Park public Native and meetings was staff this invited MP American sought were update. to also input participate The sent Consultations from Fort out to as potentially McDowell all a stakeholder of the Yavapai interested partners in the Nation and planning American stakeholders shares process. a Indian boundary associated Invitations communities with with the to
the present planning at the effort. stakeholder Several meetings representatives that were from held the in January Fort McDowell and May Yavapai of 2018. Nation were
Additionally, protect consultation any in significant with order representatives to assist resources, in assessing of future American the MP cultural updates Indian significance and Communities efforts of or should actions claiming go needed through cultural to
affiliation to the area.
8 18, Desert 2012. Soils, Joseph R. McAuliffe, http://www.desertmuseum.org/books/nhsd_desert_soils.php as accessed April
3-8

3.4.1 Findings ________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Cultural archaeological historical support resource of sites a variety surveys had records been of within projects identified were the reviewed such Park. by those as Several in hiking surveys. order previously trail to These document construction, recorded studies the were archaeological campgrounds, extent undertaken of previous and and in
roadwork (1) identified by the site military within as near Pemberton the the between Park Park. has Ranch No 1870 been new (AZ and field listed U: 1890 6323). surveys on has the Though were been National undertaken recognized unmarked, Register by for the of SHPO Historic this Stoneman plan as Places the update. Trail Historic and used One is
Stoneman Research 5:10) Additional is thought identified Trail sites (I-2733. within to a be number the SHPO). a Park former of include recorded Hohokam prehistoric archeological village Hohokam with sites. three agricultural Among (3) or them, four sites, one (4) geometric (AZ: rooms. U:
and A known recommended cultural zoomorphic sites. resource A prior full petroglyphs, cultural management to any new resource and the construction program Dixie survey Mine. should or or investigation trail be project established on and previously to SHPO track consultation and undisturbed monitor is
ground.
3.5 Hunting Natural Resources
As open hunting a quarter per for the seasons. archery-only mile Arizona of The any: Game AZGFD’s and developed and some Fish commission small Department’s picnic game area rule (shotgun and (AZGFD) states campground; with “it regulations, is birdshot not shooting permitted only) the Park during range; to hunt is currently occupied specified within
building; from, must entering declare on, the boat or Park. across ramp; their Hunting a intent golf roadway course; is to discussed a or Park recreational to trespass entry further station areas in on 3.9.3 private developed attendant Hunting. property9.“ for or public other Individuals use; employee, and to hunting shoot upon
Non-Attainment Maricopa from quality airborne regulations. County’s particulate or Air Maintenance Nearly Quality matter the Department entire Areas10 and with Phoenix (MCAQD) complying metropolitan is tasked with federal, area with falls protecting state, within and the the local public non- air
attainment Environmental area. Protection The following Agency designations (EPA) determines remain otherwise: in effect until the United States
9 AZ-Hunt-Regulations_WEB.pdf 10 Maps https://s3.amazonaws.com/azgfd-portal-wordpress/azgfd.wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/24093438/2018-19- Maricopa as accessed County on Air October Quality 3, Department, 2018. Planning Area Maps, https://www.maricopa.gov/2686/Planning-Area-
3-9

Particulate ________________________________________________________________ Matter Resource Analysis
Inhalable PM10 soot, diameter and Non-attainment as coarse other defined tiny particulate by bits the Area, of Environmental matter11 solid and materials subject is sized Protection that to at either dust-control are Agency released 2.5 (PM2.5) (EPA). measures. into The or and 10 Park move (PM10) PM10 is entirely around micrometers includes within in the dust, the air in
(either in the Park from office. natural or anthropogenic sources). County inspection reports are kept on file
Ozone The level, photochemical particularly Park ozone is included from aids smog) motor in creating within and vehicles) NOx13 the smog 8-hour in (a and the reaction presence is Ozone formed Nonattainment of of by nitrogen heat the and reaction and sunlight. Area oxygen of boundaries. VOCs12 gases (for in At example, the ground air,
Carbon The Maricopa designated Park Monoxide is County by located the Maintenance EPA Air entirely Quality has exceeded within Area Department acceptable the Carbon (MCAQD) national Monoxide explains standards (CO) that Maintenance for the CO area pollution previously Area. levels. The
The declaring odorless, Vehicle EPA exhaust re-designated colorless the area contributes gas a maintenance this that area to forms roughly in when attainment area 60 as the percent opposed carbon of the (60%) national to in a fuels of nonattainment all CO does CO standards emissions not completely area. in nationwide, 2005, CO burn. is thus an
and processes up to and 95 percent natural (95%) sources in such cities8. as wildfires. Other sources include fuel combustion in industrial
Fire At charcoal resources through times Bans September it grills) during is necessary throughout dry 30 periods each to implement the year. or entire windy A violation a Park days. ban in A on of typical order Park all fires Rule to fire ensure (such ban R-11314 may as public campfires, may be in safety result effect fire in and from a pits, citation protect May and 1
and during the Department. amount Park extreme eviction. of seasonal fire Gas bans. and monsoon Lifting propane the rainfall use fire is ban usually the is dependent Park acceptable receives on in regional and designated is announced temperatures areas, by except and the
11 2018. 12 temperature molecules 13 Volatile EPA, Particulate to organic evaporate conditions. compounds Matter or Their sublimate (PM high (VOCs) 10) vapor from Information, are pressure the organic liquid results https://www.epa.gov/green-book chemicals or solid from form that a low of have the boiling compound a high point, vapor and which as pressure enter accessed causes the at large surrounding ordinary, September numbers room- air. 13, of
produced temperatures. into NOx the is atmosphere a from generic In the areas term as reaction of air high for pollution mono-nitrogen of motor nitrogen can vehicle be significant. and traffic, oxides oxygen such NO gases as and in NO2 large in the (nitric cities, air during oxide the amount and combustion, nitrogen of nitrogen dioxide). especially oxides They emitted at high are
Supervisors. 14 information/Park-rules-and-hours-of-operation/ Maricopa County Parks https://www.maricopacountyParks.net/Park-locator/mcdowell-mountain-regional-Park/Park- and Recreation, Park as Rules, accessed Adopted September August 4, 13, 2018. 2003 by Maricopa County Board of
3-10

A burn • ________________________________________________________________ Cooking 303.1.a) permit is for not needed immediate from human MCAQD consumption for the following (Regulation activities:15 III, Rule Resource 314, Analysis Section
• • Warmth Recreational (Regulation for III, human purposes Rule beings 314, where 303.3b, (Regulation the unless burning III, under Rule material a 314, fire 303.3a, ban) is clean, unless dry wood under or a fire charcoal ban)
However, they may be it prohibited should be noted while under that while a fire a ban. permit may not be needed for these activities,
3.6 This conditions section Physiography and reviews other the natural physiographic and surroundings. Climate properties of the Park and describes typical climatic
3.6.1 MMRP province between development Physiography is narrow within of the of the the faulted Southwest northern province mountain United edge is the chains of States. result the and Arizona of An flat crustal abrupt arid section valleys extension change of the or Cenozoic basins, in that elevation, began is Basin typical in alternating and the here. Range Early The
Miocene between them, era. As creating these the geologic basins. blocks tilted, sediments from erosion filled the valleys
The range, to approximately southeast Park the itself McDowell direction 17,000 is situated Mountain acres and in of is the Range the about lower McDowell extends five Verde (5) approximately Sonoran River miles basin. Preserve wide. As ten The a (10) to free-standing Park the miles west is in protected and a northwest mountain the Fort by
McDowell over Peak recognizable 3,000 and Thompson Yavapai feet. feature The Nation two of Peak, the most to both McDowell the notable southeast. exceeding Mountain peaks The 3,900 near mountain Range feet the in center is range elevation. Tom’s of features the Thumb. Additionally, range a handful This are: prominent McDowell of a highly peaks
topographic granite body jutting feature out located of the towards ridgeline the at an north elevation end of of over the 3,500 range feet. is a Mesoproterozoic
The the biologically the Southwest Park dominate is located diverse United feature within desert States, of Basin the in extending the Sonoran and world Range Desert, into and Mexico. covers Province. one of approximately This four The desert deserts Sonoran region in 100,000 North Desert is one square America, of is the the miles hottest and most of is
deserts Winter and in the summer United monsoon States although storms winter provide temperatures much needed can water sometimes to the rich reach and freezing. diverse
15 https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5200/Rule-314---Open-Outdoor-Fires-and-Indoor-Fireplaces- Fires Maricopa and Indoor County Fireplaces Air Quality at Commercial Department, and Regulation Institutional III - Control Establishments. of Air Contaminants, Rule 314 Open Outdoor
at-Commercial-and-Institutional-Establishments?bidId= as accessed October 3, 2018.
3-11

desert abundant ________________________________________________________________ life. spring The flowering winter storms, season. when they produce enough precipitation, Resource result Analysis in an
3.6.2 The over provide warmest 100°F Climate visitors and months with Park an are activity opportunity June through slows to down. enjoy August the Cooler when scenic months, the beauty average without November temperature the through heat. can March, reach
Monsoon (due September may to be seasonal experienced thunderstorms and may wind produce as shifts well. are and heavy also On daytime the experienced rain highest and/or heating16) mountain throughout humidity. generally peaks, Occasional the in Phoenix temperatures the months wind metropolitan or of can July dust through be storms 8-12 area
degrees highest near 2,000 points cooler feet of (AMSL). than the in McDowell the valley. Mountain Snow may Range be typically seen at least above once 4,000 or feet twice and a occasionally year on the
Annual 3-9). when thunderstorms, Light plentiful, rainfall winter is lead is scant, frequently rains to an produce and abundant largely torrential. grasses, wildflower limited forage to the season. plants, winter Summer green and late up rain, the summer cacti largely and seasons the ocotillo; product (Figure and of
Figure 3-9: Average Annual Temperature and Precipitation
Source: 2018. The Weather Channel, https://weather.com/weather/monthly/l/85268:4:US as accessed October 1,
https://sgsup.asu.edu/basics-arizona-monsoon-desert-meteorology 16 ASU, School of Geographical Sciences & Urban Planning, Basics of as the accessed Arizona October Monsoon 3, 2018. & Desert Meteorology,
3-12

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
3.7 The The Reclamation water United Water resources States (Reclamation), Resources Congress section established in describes 1902 and surface the by U.S. 1903 and Reclamation they groundwater had authorized Services, resources later the within Roosevelt the Bureau the Park. Dam of
project region. several Metropolitan Construction on more the area dams Salt began River. of completed the withdrawing Roosevelt This accelerated by Dam 1920. higher was Near growth quality completed the of groundwater beginning the in 1911, south-central with of from 1922, the the Arizona construction Lower the Phoenix desert Verde of
River 1922, from basin the are Valley water Rio due to resources Verde to supplement agricultural floodplain from the diversions the aquifer. supply underground However, from via the the Fort aquifer the Salt McDowell majority River. have Since been of Yavapai the the continually water initial Nation losses withdraws and withdrawn from nearby the in
groundwater additional water for the sources. storage surface withdrawals. of The flood-waters water completion resources It wasn’t and of Bartlett controlled were until utilized Dam the releases completion and in conjunction Horseshoe of water of for Bartlett Dam with irrigation.17 to stored Dam the north, underground in 1939 allowed that
3.7.1 Principle Rio perennial located Verde Surface approximately perennial stream River, Water throughout Gila streams 1.5 Hydrology River, miles within the and east AMA18. the the of Phoenix Salt MMRP. The River. Rio Active The Verde However, Park Management River itself the is flows situated Verde Area north (AMA) River within to south is include the the Lower and only the is
Verde does watersheds fall under have River a the number that Valley United distribute basin. of States natural, While storm Environmental ephemeral the water Park does runoff and not Protection mostly throughout have unnamed perennial Agency’s the Park. washes, or 1986/1988 intermittent These and major five Regulatory streams, (5) washes major it
definition (Figure 3-10). of “Waters of the United States” Section 404 Clean Water Act and are identified in
17 18 http://repository.azgs.az.gov/sites/default/files/dlio/files/2010/u15/CR-03-B.pdf Subsurface Arizona Department Geologic Investigation of Water Resources, of Fountain http://www.azwater.gov/ Hills and the Lower Verde as accessed River Valley, as October accessed Maricopa 8, October 2018. County, 8, 2018. Arizona.
3-13

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure The Rio floodway Verde Park’s 3-10: or Major River northern floodplain. washes area most (Figure (Section boundary 404) 3-11). (light falls The blue majority within lines)19 a regulatory of the Park floodway is not located and floodplain within a major of the
19 https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/water/watersheds/ National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD), obtained October 9, 2018. For more information on the WBD, see
3-14

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure The provides Maricopa 3-11: flood Floodway alerts County and through Floodplain Flood the Control following Department monitoring (FCD) stations monitors (Table 3-1): precipitation and
Table Station ID 3-1: Stream Station Flow Name Monitoring Station Type Install Date
9510000 9511300 Rio below Rio Scottsdale Verde Verde Bartlett River River Dam near Stream Stream Flow Flow 10/1944 3/1961
Flood 5900 5915 Alert Asher McDowell Park System Hills Mountain Precipitation Precipitation 8/2/1990 8/6/1990
5920 5978 5990 McDowell Road Golden Hesperus Eagle Dam Mountain Blvd Precip/Stage Precipitation Precip/Stage 5/18/204 2/12/1997 12/18/1996
5995 Source: Area (AMA) Arizona Hesperus Water Wash Atlas Volume Precipitation 8 Phoenix Active 3/10/997 Management
3-15

3.7.2 Groundwater ________________________________________________________________ Resources Resource Analysis
MMRP groundwater there the Park; are resides however, currently and in the require these three AMA20 wells (3) additional groundwater registered are not withdrawal currently wells basin; (55‐614022, active. these rate are management. areas 55‐623551, that rely According and heavily 55‐623552) to on ADWR mined at
3.8 The much of years.21 Park Earth of Arizona. is The located Resources McDowell Basin within and Mountain Range the Basin is a Range result and Range (McDowell’s) of tectonic Province forces trends of and the in Desert volcanism a southeast Southwest, over direction millions as is
near range. rising maximum the abruptly Comparatively, southern elevation from end of the the and 4,116 surround McDowell’s a north-northwest feet desert (AMSL) are floor a Elevations relatively form direction approximately low within towards elevation the range the desert 2,000 northern vary feet mountain widely, (AMSL) end of range with to the a
relatively part of the flat range. areas in the central part of the range to prominent cliffs near the northern
3.8.1 The and of loose rounded rock phyllite aggregation Geology types fragments (Figure found of 3-12). small are less mostly water-worn than Conglomerate 2mm conglomerate within or is pounded a a coarse-grained and matrix gravel stones. of finer with Sandstone sedimentary grained some areas is material, sedimentary of rock sand, gravel composed granite, rock is a
composed fragments. feldspar. shaped mica Phyllite Granite of minerals mainly differs is igneous sand that in that are sized rock strongly it is (0.625 that foliated is parallel coarse-grained to metamorphic 2mm) allowing grains in the rock texture of rock mineral composed to with be particles some split mainly into quartz of or sheets flake- rock and
(usually description Map Services, gray of see locations black Appendix or of greenish occurrence, D. in color). as compiled For a by full Arizona list of Geological rock types Survey22 and detailed (AZGS)
20 21 accessed https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/97688/content//tmp/package-8bTpta/Vance_asu_0010N_12324.pdf Arizona Structural September Department Evolution 14, of of 2018. the Water McDowell Resources, Mountains, http://www.azwater.gov/ Brad Vance as accessed October 3, 2018. as
22 http://www.azgs.az.gov/services_azgeomap.shtml The Arizona Geological Survey, AZGS Map Services as Geologic accessed Map August of Arizona, 10, 2018.
3-16

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure 3-12: Geology
3.8.2 In monitoring near addition the Land Park.23 to active Subsidence water land rights, subsidence and ADWR Earth areas. is also Fissures There the state are agency no known responsible land subsidence for identifying areas in and or
Effective AZGS providing online to with September complete earth other fissure Geographic comprehensive 21, 2006, map data Information Arizona to mapping the Revised ASLD. System of Statute This earth (GIS) information (A.R.S.) map fissures layers § 27-152.01(3) throughout is for to the be public made Arizona requires available to use and the in
building fissures are their currently own customized known within maps. the Parts Park itself. of Maricopa County were mapped24 and no
In (Marcus Marcus 2002, Landslide, Landslide) ASU researchers approximately located discovered on the 500,000 northeast the years second side ago, of a largest huge the McDowell’s. avalanche known landslide caused At the loose time in Arizona granite of the
23 9, 24 Map, Arizona 2018. http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/Hydrology/Geophysics/LandSubsidenceInArizona.htm Department of Water Resources, Hydrology Division, Arizona Land Subsidence Areas as and accessed Interactive October
2018. The Arizona Geological Survey, Arizona’s Earth Fissure Center, http://www.azgs.az.gov as accessed October 9,
3-17

bedrock debris cubic meters ________________________________________________________________ field to slide extends of debris at an nearly (Figure estimated a mile 3-13). 44 east-northeast miles per hour and from created atop between the mountain 5.5 Resource and range. 7 Analysis million The
N
Figure 3-13: Marcus Landslide
3.8.3 The Hermanos including major Soils25 rock Complex soil and outcrop types Erosion in found in the the development Potential in primitive the Park management are management primarily zone zones, gravelly areas and loam (Figure Wickenburg and 3-14). Pinaleno-Tres The complex soils
immediately See Appendix surrounding D for the soils the map McDowell’s and definitions. have a low to moderate shrink/swell potential.26
Due is fills these high the to materials the in “basins” these steep can areas, and within be rugged transported resulting a Basin slope in and (20-25% to talus Range lower and lying or system). N alluvium greater) areas During deposits below. of the an mountains, below extreme (and flash erosion is what flood potential slowly event,
25 26 https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs144p2_064581.pdf USDA USDA, Natural Natural Resources Resources Conservation Conservation Service, Service, Soils Soil Properties website, Shrink/Swell as accessed Potential, October as accessed 9, 2018. October 10, 2018.
3-18

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure 3-14: Soils
3.9 The County plants Sonoran State Biological and is Desert located of animals. Arizona scrub in Resources The the has environment. central wildlife over 900 portion and animal vegetation of species the Sonoran commonly and a Desert diversity seen and in of the is landscapes. home Park to is a typical variety Maricopa of of a
Fire environment, more homesteaders) is of not a risk historically although and today. these Historic common with grasses intrusion cattle to can an also activity Arizona of human serve brought Upland as influence fuel to Subdivision more fires. and grasses adjacent - Sonoran into development, the Desert area (as scrub it did is
On (approximately a native summer July grasses 7, storm 1995, lead 14,000 combined the to the acres Rio wide Fire with in spread all). burned 30 The mile fire Rio nearly damage per Fire, hour which two-thirds which winds was is and still caused of visible aggressively-growing the by Park’s a today lightning (Figure total bolt acreage 3-15). from non-
Native another these hazards grasses vegetation (Figure six (6) having 3-16). decades is starting been before burned to poke the away, native back the saguaro up Park from is forest the rated desert returns. relatively floor Due but low to it for the will potential majority be at least fire of
3-19

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure 3-15: 1995 Rio Fire Damage inside McDowell Mountain Regional Park Boundary
Figure 3-16: Environmental Hazards (Source: http://data.azgs.az.gov/hazard-viewer)
3-20

The and elements Arizona covers ________________________________________________________________ in the this Upland entirety biotic Subdivision community of MMRP. Sonoran (Figure High temperatures Desert 3-17). scrub occurs and little on precipitation slopes and Resource broken are common Analysis ground
Figure 3-17: Biotic Communities (Source: Arizona Game and Fish Department, HabiMap™)
3.9.1 Common Examples mountain, Sonoran Wildlife Population) Reptiles of and/or species and brushier adapted and Amphibians Gila vegetation to monster the bajadas, include (Heloderma or the rocky Desert suspectum). and steep tortoise Other terrain (Gopherus common at the agassizii, foot reptiles of a
found Snake Rattlesnake Diamondback in (Phyllorhynchus the (Crotalus Park rattlesnake include: tigris); browni); (Crotalus Regal Variable Horned Sonoran atrox); Sandsnake Lizard and coral Mohave (Phyrnosoma snake (Chilomeniscus Rattlesnake (Micruroides solare); (Crotalus stramineus); euryxanthus); Saddled scutulatus). Leaf-nosed Western Tiger
Common Within identifies boundaries. (Cathartes the reproductively Birds AZGFD’s aura); There are Great HabiMap™ many active Horned resident online birds Owl that species planning (Bubo occur that tool, virginianus); or inhabit have the Arizona the the potential Park Gila Breeding such Woodpecker to as: occur Bird Turkey within Atlas (Centurus Vulture query Park
uropygialis); brunneicapillus); Common Canyon Wren raven (Catherpes (Corvus mexicanus); corax); Cactus Rock Wren Wren (Salpinctes (Campylorhynchus obsoletus);
3-21

Phainopepla (Richmondema There Important ________________________________________________________________ are no Bird riparian (Phainopepla cardinalis); Area (IBA) corridor’s and located nitens); the located Western east-northeast House within burrowing Finch the of Park (Caprodacus the owl boundaries. Park (Athene along cunicularia mexicanus); However, the Rio Resource Verde hypugaea). there Cardinal Analysis River is an
which or migrate supports thorough a variety to their of migratory winter home. birds. Many migratory species overwinter in Arizona
Common The Most tailed Park commonly Jack is Mammals home Rabbit seen to (Lepus a are variety Coyote californicus), of animals (Canis latrans), species Desert that Cottontail Mule are Deer typical (Sylvilagus (Odocoileus of the desert audubonii), hemionus), environment. Bobcat Black-
(Lynx (Ammospermophilus species rufus), of bat. Arizona harrisii), Pocket Javelina Mouse (Perognathus (Tayassuidae), amplus), and at least Harris’ eleven Antelope (11) different Squirrel
3.9.2 The currently Department U.S. Special Fish has of 43 Status and Interior’s federally Wildlife Wildlife Endangered Threatened Service (USFWS) or Species Endangered27 Act - Federal (ESA) animal within Register species the (Register) State listed of under Arizona. (Table the 3-2) The U.S.
Register regularly within Maricopa is to updated ensure County. compliance. daily and species See Appendix may be added E for a or listing dropped of these and animals should be that checked occur
Staff will management is include in the and beginning updated natural stages species resource of updating list, needs. best a natural management resource practices plan for the and Department prioritize that the
Scientific Name Federal Register Common Listed Name Species for Category MMRP Bird Threatened Status
Coccyzus Empidonax extimus Rallus obsoletus americanus traillii Southwestern Flycatcher Yellow-billed cuckoo Willow Bird Endangered
occidentalis Leopardus Panthera onca paradis Yuma Ocelot Jaguar ridgeway's rail Mammal Mammal Bird Endangered Endangered Endangered
Table 3-2: Federal Register Listed Species
27 2018. http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/pub/stateListingIndividual.jsp?state=AZ&status=listed U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Species Report, as accessed October 9,
3-22

3.9.3 Additionally, following five (5) Natural ________________________________________________________________ mammals, may AZGFD be Heritage found four tracks (4) in Program the birds, animals Park: four of a – (4) state total Heritage reptiles of concern sixteen and Data through (16) one Management (1) species its mollusk HDMS.28 including (Table System Of Resource those two 3-3). (HDMS) (2) listed, Analysis plants, the
Listing Federal BGA without Status U.S. - - Bald Fish Definitions: prior and and FWS Golden Wildlife permit. Eagle (FWS) Protection Status: Act: Prohibits take of bald and golden eagles
Endangered SC LE – - Listed Species Species Endangered of Act Concern (ESA): (FWS)
LT PS XN PDL - - - Partial Listed - Experimental Proposed Threatened Status; for nonessential Listed delisting Endangered population or Threatened, but not in entire range
SAT PE PT - - Proposed - Proposed Listed Threatened, Endangered Threatened due to similarity of appearance
FWS Candidate CCA - Candidate for Conservation for Conservation
FWS Critical Y P DPS - - Yes Proposed - Distinct Habitat Critical Critical Population Habitat Habitat Segment
USFS US S - Forest Sensitive Service-Animal Status
BLM US S P west - - Bureau Sensitive Population of the of Colorado Land (Only Management River those are populations sensitive. of Banded Gila Monster that occur north and
NPL information) Native HS - Highly Plant Safeguarded- Law (also refer no collection to Vegetation Chapter 3.6.8 for more plant species
SR ER - - Salvage Export Salvage-Transport Restricted- permit out collection of state only prohibited
28 query Arizona http://habimap.org/habimap/ Game and Fish Department, as Natural accessed Heritage October Program, 9, 2018. https://azhgis2.esri.com/ and HabiMap™ HDMS
3-23

SA HR ________________________________________________________________ - - Salvage Harvest Assessed- Restricted-permits Permits required required to to move remove live plant trees by-products Resource Analysis
Ericameria Corynorhinus Agave murpheyi brachylepis Scientific townsendii Name pallescens Rayless Pale Hohokam Townsend's Turpentine Special Agave Common Status Big-eared Bush Name Species Bat FWS SC SC USFS S S BLM S S NPL HS
Haliaeetus Heloderma Gopherus Haliaeetus Falco peregrinus morafkai leucocephalus leucocephalus suspectum anatum cinctum pop. (wintering 3 pop.) Banded Bald Sonoran Bald American Eagle Eagle Gila Desert Peregrine - - Sonoran Winter Monster Tortoise Population Falcon Desert Population SC, SC, CCA SC SC BGA BGA S S S S S S S S
Macrotus Maricopella Lithobates Heloderma Leptonycteris californicus yavapaiensis suspectum allynsmithi yerbabuenae suspectum California Squaw Lowland Reticulate Lesser Long-nosed Peak Leopard Leaf-nosed Gila Talussnail Monster Frog Bat Bat SC SC SC SC S S S
Table Myotis PCH Rallus for obsoletus 3-3: velifer Coccyzus Special yumanensis americanus Status Species Cave Yuma Yellow-billed Habitat) Myotis Ridgway's Cuckoo Rail (Proposed Critical SC LE S
MMRP Nation which species are (+2mile and listed: found Salt Desert proximity) Verde within pupfish Riparian the also two had (Cyprinodon (2) Ecosystem mile a Bat proximity Colony as macularis-LE), IBAs. listed buffer. In and the There both special Roundtail the were species Fort also Chub McDowell three status (Gila (3) list, robusta- Yavapai aquatic all of
CCA, require found S, just S), permanent outside and Gila the topminnow water, Park in which the (Poeciliopsis Rio MMRP Verde does River. occidentalis not have and occ. LE); therefore however, these these species species are
3.9.4 The actions and State health Species in of its of Arizona State the of Greatest Wildlife State’s has identified wildlife. Action Conservation Plan certain The (SWAP)30 list species Need includes and (SGCN)29 with species those the greatest are that indicative are need currently for of conservation the diversity listed as
threatened vulnerability highlight common species the or needs such endangered common" as of these low and and species, under maintain declining the as well ESA as populations. as much as Special well of Arizona's Status as Overall, many Species, biodiversity it others is in AZGFD’s an with effort as possible significant intent to "keep to in
29 9, Arizona 2018. 23 Game and Fish Department, HabiMap™ SGCN query, http://habimap.org/habimap/ as accessed October
30 https://www.azgfd.com/PortalImages/files/wildlife/2012-2022_Arizona_State_Wildlife_Action_Plan.pdf Arizona Game and Fish Department, State Wildlife Action Plan, 2012 – 2022.
3-24

light area (or of ________________________________________________________________ development within a two (2) pressures mile proximity) and habitat are included loss. These in the species (Table within 3-4). the Resource Park planning Analysis
Each of State Fragmentation the species status, following in declining status the vulnerability ‘Species and/or status, of Distribution Greatest Disjunct criteria Conservation (categories): status, status. Demographic The Need’ Extirpated list generated (SGCN) status, from list, for Concentration Arizona, was the scored species Federal for status, within each or
the including Park as 18 well Mammals, as within 29 birds, a two 10 (2) reptiles, mile proximity, 3 Amphibians has and identified 1 Mollusk. 61 species of SGCN,
Status-Tiers 1A least under conservation Vulnerable one the (1) ESA; agreement of (in Candidate the at following least (CCA, one species of additional CCAA; the under eight recently criteria: ESA; (8) categories is removed specifically listed as listed from endangered covered the above) ESA under and or and threatened matches currently a signed at
requires identified delisting by Arizona monitoring; Game And Fish Closed Commission season species Orders 40, (i.e. 41-43. no take permitted) as
1B criteria Vulnerable as listed in in at Tier least 1A. one of the vulnerability categories but do not match the other
1C meaning assessed Unknown at lacking this status time. data species. More to address research Scored the is “0” needed. categories, for vulnerability and vulnerability in one of the status eight categories, cannot be
Chionactis Coccyzus Empidonax americanus Scientific occipitalis traillii extimus Name klauberi Tucson Yellow-billed Southwestern Species Shovel-nosed Common Cuckoo Of Willow Greatest Name (Western Flycatcher Snake Conservation DPS) FWS Need SC LT LE USFS S BLM NPL SGCN 1A 1A 1A
Falco Gopherus Haliaeetus Heloderma peregrinus morafkai leucocephalus suspectum anatum American Sonoran Bald Gila Monster Eagle Desert Peregrine Tortoise Falcon SC, CCA SC BGA S S S S S S 1A 1A 1A 1A
Leopardus Leptonycteris Lithobates Panthera Aix sponsa onca yavapaiensis pardalis yerbabuenae Ocelot Lesser Lowland Jaguar Wood Duck Long-nosed Leopard Frog Bat SC SC LE LE S S 1A 1A 1A 1A 1B
Ammospermophilus Anaxyrus Aquila Athene Botaurus chrysaetos cunicularia lentiginosus microscaphus hypugaea harrisii Harris' Arizona Golden Western American Antelope Eagle Toad Burrowing Bittern Squirrel Owl BGA SC SC S S S S 1B 1B 1B 1B 1B
Table Buteo 3-4: regalis Species of Greatest Conservation Ferruginous Need Hawk SC S 1B
3-25

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Castor canadensis American Beaver 1B
Chilomeniscus stramineus Variable Sandsnake 1B
Colaptes chrysoides Gilded Flicker S 1B
Coluber bilineatus Sonoran Whipsnake 1B
Corynorhinus townsendii pallescens Pale Townsend's Big-eared Bat SC S S 1B
Crotalus tigris Tiger Rattlesnake 1B
Euderma maculatum Spotted Bat SC S S 1B
Eumops perotis californicus Greater Western Bonneted Bat SC S 1B
Incilius alvarius Sonoran Desert Toad 1B
Kinosternon sonoriense sonoriense Desert Mud Turtle S 1B
Lasiurus blossevillii Western Red Bat S 1B
Lasiurus xanthinus Western Yellow Bat S 1B
Macrotus californicus California Leaf-nosed Bat SC S 1B
Maricopella allynsmithi Squaw Peak Talussnail SC 1B
Melanerpes uropygialis Gila Woodpecker 1B
Melospiza lincolnii Lincoln's Sparrow 1B
Melozone aberti Abert's Towhee S 1B
Microtus mexicanus Mexican Vole 1B
Micruroides euryxanthus Sonoran Coralsnake 1B
Myotis occultus Arizona Myotis SC S 1B
Myotis velifer Cave Myotis SC S 1B
Myotis yumanensis Yuma Myotis SC 1B
Nyctinomops femorosaccus Pocketed Free-tailed Bat 1B
Passerculus sandwichensis Savannah Sparrow 1B
Phrynosoma solare Regal Horned Lizard 1B
Phyllorhynchus browni Saddled Leaf-nosed Snake 1B
Setophaga petechia Yellow Warbler 1B
Tadarida brasiliensis Brazilian Free-tailed Bat 1B
Toxostoma lecontei LeConte's Thrasher S 1B
Troglodytes pacificus Pacific Wren 1B
Vireo bellii arizonae Arizona Bell's Vireo 1B
Vulpes macrotis Kit Fox No Status 1B
Calypte costae Costa's Hummingbird 1C
Cistothorus palustris Marsh Wren 1C
Empidonax wrightii Gray Flycatcher 1C
Micrathene whitneyi Elf Owl 1C
Myiarchus tyrannulus Brown-crested Flycatcher 1C
Oreoscoptes montanus Sage Thrasher 1C
Oreothlypis luciae Lucy's Warbler 1C
Sphyrapicus nuchalis Red-naped Sapsucker 1C
Spizella atrogularis Black-chinned Sparrow 1C
Spizella breweri Brewer's Sparrow 1C
Vireo vicinior Gray Vireo S 1C
Table 3-4: Species of Greatest Conservation Need (continued)
While six aquatic species were identified on the list, the Park does not have a permanent
body of water large enough to sustain fish populations. The species that were identified in
the list were found to be located within the two (2) mile proximity area and include Longfin
Dace, Desert Sucker, Sonora Sucker, Gila Topminnow (LE), Roundtail Chub and Speckled
Dace.
3-26

3.9.5 ________________________________________________________________ Other Types of Wildlife Resource Analysis
Occasionally, and these homing. non-native animals Park are species staff turned that finds over have other to been the types abandoned appropriate of animals or agency within lost inside for the their Park; the Park. care usually When and domestic potential discovered, pets re-
3.9.6 AZGFD county considered lands; Wildlife namely and has extensively this a wildlife Tonto Linkages part of National block researched the Phoenix due Forest. to and Metropolitan its The recorded adjacency closest critical Valley wildlife to other wildlife (Valley) corridor vast linkage (Figure expanses is located areas 3-18). of along for undisturbed The the the Park entire Rio is
Verde along species. the River It Rio is also extending Verde considered River south is an considered where Important it connects a Bird wildlife Area with linkage (IBA). the Salt corridor River. for Additionally, a variety of the wildlife area
Figure 3-18: Wildlife Linkages
The contiguous foreseeable McDowell’s future. natural are Currently, considered area capable these to be mountains of part supporting of a wildland are connected a diverse block; to meaning array undeveloped of it wildlife is part mountainous of into a large the
terrain which also to the borders north the via United a small States undeveloped Department portion of Agriculture’s of land associated Tonto National with the Forest Preserve to
3-27

the becoming becoming north ________________________________________________________________ and infinitely significant east. With busier barriers Dynamite with to the the Road/E. increase movement Rio of housing Verde of wildlife Drive developments, and through McDowell this these Resource area. Mountain two Currently, roads Analysis Road are
there boundaries Park’s animals are surrounding and no however, humans designated neighbors the alike. Park critical Likewise, provides to find wildlife the additional an riparian important linkage wildlife corridor refuge zones linkages for along (or wildlife. corridors) the would Rio Working be Verde within beneficial with River Park the to is
considered The protecting City of a and Scottsdale potential managing linkage draft Sonoran General zone across Desert Plan habitat 2035 biodiversity as (page well 115) as and an outlines IBA. native ecosystems, six main goals which for
include to preserve maintaining habitat linkages. natural washes as wildlife movement corridors and avoid disturbances
Additionally, recognizes preserves, the the the Town, importance Town and the of of Park undeveloped Fountain designates Hills washes these (Town) as areas wildlife General for open linkages Plan space 2002 between preservation. (page the two 59-63) (2)
3.9.7 A the Environmental flora Park; Vegetation inventory the Information inventory completed and Network in 198131 a searchable website32. showed database 289 The species following are and available native variations plants on occurring the are commonly Southwest within
seen Saguaro Marigold poppy in (Eschscholzia the cactus (Baileya Park: (Carnegiea multiradiata), California californica), gigantean), sage Buckhorn Thornber’s (Salvia Creosote cholla columbariae), buckhorn (Cylindropuntia bush (Larrea Ocotillo (Cylindropuntia tridentate), acanthocarpa), (Fouquieria Showy acanthocarpa), splendens), California Desert-
Teddy-bear trees Velvet Verde such Fire. mesquite as It cholla Ironwood would (Prosopia (Cylindropuntia be (Olneya beneficial velutina). tesota), bigelovii), to Much update Palo of Soaptree the the Verde flora Park’s (Parkinsonia in yucca MMPR flora (Yucca inventory was microphylla/florida), elata), burned prior as in well the to the 1995 as desert 2039 and Rio
Master There (Table Buffelgrass are Plan 3-5) currently (Pennisetum Update. for the twenty-four State ciliare), of Arizona; which (24) species of is which, both of a plants only Regulated one listed is Pest known on and the to Noxious Prohibited occur Weeds at Noxious MMRP. list
Weed. land including disturbed below It is the areas 3,000ft found southwest within widespread (914 the U.S. m); Park, introduced from in especially California disturbed throughout near to habitats, Texas. campsites, the Invasive spreads warmer, parking Species very drier quickly lots, regions obtain washes on a of foot abandoned and the hold world along in
trails 31 which are ripe ground for noxious weeds and invasive species. The most common
Journal 32SEINet http://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/checklists/checklist.php?clid=4&pid=1 Lane, of Meredith Arizona the Arizona-Nevada – A. New 1981. Mexico Vegetation Academy Chapter and – of Arizona flora Science, of Flora McDowell https://www.jstor.org/stable/40025615?origin=JSTOR-pdf – McDowell Mountain Mountain Regional SEINet, Regional accessed Park, Maricopa Park October County, 10, 2018 Arizona.
3-28

invasive (Penisetum grass (Cynodon ________________________________________________________________ species setaceum), dactylon) within red the and brome Park perennial (Bromus include starthistles. rubens), buffelgrass Tamarisk (Pennisetum (Tamarix ciliare), chinensis), Resource fountain Bermuda Analysis grass
Many surrounding progression buffelgrass, native were each from desert introduced plant. moving scrub This plant into to area repair the species has desert the “no” have landscape fuel scrub a load zone habitats. from and of degradation will over-grazing. Invasive help slow with Species, However and no stop vegetation especially this the also fire
increased by desert providing scrub the plant vertical fire fuel species and load horizontal do across not have the contiguous adaptations Sonoran desert, fuel to recurrent load. making Saguaro fires. damaging cactus fires and many more likely other
ScientificName Common Name Noxious Invasive Weed Plant Conservation NatureServe Arizona Species Status NatureServe Global Status Nativity A/B/P Lifeform
Bromus Centaurea Cynodon rubens dactylon melitensis Red Maltese Bermuda Brome Star-Thislte Grass SNA/EXOTIC SNA/EXOTIC SNA/EXOTIC GNR GNR GNR INVASIVE INVASIVE INVASIVE Perenial Annual Annual Graminoid Graminoid Forb
Pennisetum Pennisetum setaceum ciliare Fountin Bufflegrass Grass PNW & RNW SNA/EXOTIC SNA/EXOTIC GNR GNR GNR INVASIVE INVASIVE Perenial Perenial Graminoid Graminoid
Sonchus Schismus Sonchus asper oleraceus arabicus Arabian Spiny-leaf Common Mediterranean Sow-thistle Sow-thistle Grass SNA/EXOTIC SNA/EXOTIC SNA/EXOTIC GNR GNR INVASIVE INVASIVE INVASIVE Annual Annual Annual Graminoid Forb Forb
Tamarix Table chinensis 3-5: Invasive Chinese Plant Tamarisk Species SNA/EXOTIC GNR INVASIVE Perenial Tree
Noxious RNW – Restricted Weed Status noxious and Code: weed PNW – Prohibited noxious weed, RGNW – Regulated noxious weed,
The regional management the Management MCPRD parks is practices, within in Plan the for beginning the management updated county stages species park priorities system of lists writing and and and management a natural will Natural include resource Resource objectives updated needs. Plan species and Please for actions. all list, refer of best the to
3.9.8 The listed USFWS under Special - the Register Status ESA within currently Vegetation the State has 21 of federally Arizona (Table threatened 3-6). or The endangered33 Register is updated plant species daily
25 Park-master-plan-update-29041 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Species as accessed Report, October https://azhgis2.esri.com/project/mcdowell-mountain-regional- 9, 2018.
3-29

and or periodically endangered species ________________________________________________________________ may for plant new be added species species or dropped. that within may the Currently, be Park. found Regular there inside are the review no Park. known of The this federally State list Resource should of threatened Arizona’s Analysis occur
‘Native most protected; species vulnerable. Plant are sixteen Harvest Law’ Of (16) provides the Safeguarded plant 289 a plant species list of (HS), species State are three protected protected found (3) in plant as the species Salvage Park, species which twenty Restricted are are Salvage (20) considered (SR), plant Assessed two species to (2) be plant (SA) are the
and are deserti), listed three Giant (3) under plant saguaro more species than (Carnegiea are one Salvage of gigantea), protected Restricted categories Desert (SR). Of ironwood the including twenty (Olneya Desert (20) species; tesota), agave four (Agave Velvet (4)
mesquite twenty (20) (Prosopis species. velutina) and Banana Yucca (Yucca baccata). Table 3-6 includes all
NatureServe® locally, provide nationally detailed is information an and excellent globally. on resource the Information status that of most at provides their plant website species. information is updated about regularly. species status They
NPL Native HS SR ER - - - Salvage Highly Export Plant Law Safeguarded- Salvage-Transport Restricted- permit no collection out collection of state only prohibited
SA HR - - Salvage Harvest Assessed- Restricted-permits Permits required required to to move remove live plant trees by-products
NatureServe SH S1 S2 – – – Critically Imperiled Possibly State Conservation Extirpated Imperiled Status
S3 S4 S5 SNR/ SNA – – – Vulnerable Apparently Secure Exotic SU – Not or Hybrid raked Secure or without Under conservation Review value.
NatureServe GX GH G1 – – – Critically Presumed Possibly Global Conservation Extinct Imperiled Extinct or or Presumed Eliminated Status Rank Eliminated
G2 G3 G4 G5 – – – – Imperiled Vulnerable Apparently Secure Secure
NatureServe G#C# GU – Un-rankable - Variable Range Rank Ranks
3-30

________________________________________________________________ GNR GNA – – Unranked Not Applicable Resource Analysis
? Q C – – – Inexact Captive Questionable Numeric or Cultivated Taxonomy Rank Only Denotes Inexact number (i.e. G2?)
T#- Intraspecific Taxon (Trinomial)
Additionally, Program.34 and Park how or conditions other See AZGFD agencies Appendix exist tracks that rank E for over may them. a 130 support: listing Of plants those of these of listed, state plants the concern that following occur through may within its be Maricopa Natural found within Heritage County the
• Hohokam Agave (Agave murpheyi)
34 29065. Arizona HabiMap™ Game and HDMS Fish Department, query http://habimap.org/habimap/ Natural Heritage Program, as accessed https://azhgis2.esri.com/project/mcdowell-3- October 10, 2018.
3-31

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
p ( / )
National Plant NatureServe State NatureServe Global
ScientificName Common Name Nativity A/B/P Lifeform
Law Status Conservation Status Status
Agave deserti Desert Agave SR SNR G4 NATIVE Perennial Succulent
Agave murpheyi Hohokam Agave HS S2 G2? Native Perennial Succulent
Carnegiea gigantea Saguaro SR, HS SNR G5 NATIVE Perennial Tree
Cylindropuntia acanthocarpa var. major Buckhorn Cholla SR Variety is not recognized; same as Staghorn Cholla NATIVE Perennial Tree/Shrub
Cylindropuntia acanthocarpa var. thornberi Staghorn Cholla SR SNR G4 NATIVE Perennial Tree/Shrub
Cylindropuntia bigelovii Teddy-Bear Cholla SR SNR G3? NATIVE Perennial Tree/Shrub
Cylindropuntia fulgida var. fulgida Jumping Cholla SR SNR G4/G5 NATIVE Perennial Tree/Shrub
Cylindropuntia leptocaulis Desert Christmas Cholla SR SNR G4? NATIVE Perennial Shrub
Cylindropuntia x tetracantha Tucson Prickly-Pear SR SNA GNA HYBRID Perennial Shrub
Ferocactus cylindraceus var. lecontei California Barrel Cactus SR SNR G5T4?Q NATIVE Perennial Shrub
Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo SR SNR G5 NATIVE Perennial Shrub
Mammillaria grahamii Graham's Niple Cactus SR S3 G4 NATIVE Perennial Shrub
Olneya tesota Desert Ironwood SA, HR S4 G4/G5 NATIVE Perennial Tree
Opuntia engelmannii Cactus Apple SR S3 G5 NATIVE Perennial Shrub/Tree
Parkinsonia florida Blue Palo-verde SR SNR G5 NATIVE Perennial Tree
Parkinsonia microphylla Little Leaf or Foothill Paloverde SA SNR G5 NATIVE Perennial Tree
Peniocereus greggii var. transmontanus Desert Night-blooming Cereus SR S3 G3G4T3T4 NATIVE Perennial Shrub
Prosopis velutina Velvet Mesquite SA, HR S5 G5 NATIVE Perennial Tree
Yucca baccata Bannana Yucca SR, HR SNR G5 NATIVE Perennial Succulent
Yucca elata var. elata Soaptree Yucca SR SNR G5TNR NATIVE Perennial Succulent
Table 3-6: Plant Species Listed (Federal/State)
For definitions on the Native Plant Law categories.https://agriculture.az.gov/sites/default/files/Native%20Plant%20Rules%20-
%20AZ%20Dept%20of%20Ag.pdf
Global and National Definitions can be found at this website: http://explorer.natureserve.org/granks.htm
State definitions are provided based on each species and is located through this website, after you enter the genus species at http://www.natureserve.org/.

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
3.10 Important identified key observation Visual in views this Resources viewpoints for section. public Management enjoyment, should be taken trail actions development into to consideration classify and and vegetation retain with any selected new management development views from are
within and management the Park. Park zoning general definitions guidance to protect is provided its scenic by the views. Department’s mission statement,
3.10.1 Residential The south southeast Park boundaries. Sensitive shares boundary Views its Views Planned of boundary the Park. communities with a number are expected of residential to occur homes at a on future the north, date near east and the
Recreation The and experience. admire Park’s trail These the Views view. system views Providing includes include: unobstructed several prominent natural spots views where is important visitors to are the likely recreational to stop
• • Scenic North natural Fire. Trail Trail saguaro (accessed (Interpretive forest via that the loop, once staging with covered area excellent at the the majority end views of Shallmo of of the pristine Park Drive) prior desert to and the Rio the
• Lousley unobstructed Forest to Hill the east. views Trail of which several can prominent be accessed peaks from located Lousley within Way the Tonto and provides National
Transportation The McDowell’s views McDowell of the and Four open Mountain Views Peaks space in the Park to Mazatzal the Drive west. Mountains Lousley provides Way travelers to (access the east. with via Lousley excellent Loop), views offers of clear the
3.11 A considered Several unique Recreation events amenity a premier hosted found at event Resources the in the Park park Park throughout for is mountain the competitive the bikers year have track and as cross and many event country as 3,000 area(s). runners people MMRP alike. over is
multiple array abundant recreational of technical days. natural and The educational loops and competitive cultural designed opportunities: resources, track to test offers their the Park skill mountain and offers endurance. bikers, visitors hikers, a Further, number and as of equestrians a more result passive of the an
• • • • Picnicking Trails Playgrounds Wildlife (hiking, viewing equestrian, mountain bike)
• Nature photography
3-33

• ________________________________________________________________ Camping Resource Analysis
3.11.1 • Interpretive Off - Highway displays Vehicles and Educational (OHV) programs
OHV and OHV However, therefore use use is within OHV not is an use Park not approved may detailed boundaries be recreational permitted further may in violate by this activity Department MP. Park within As Rule of the R-107 the staff date Park for regarding of boundaries Park publication maintenance motor or of vehicle on this its or trails plan, use. by
authorized and suppression. first responders for emergency search and rescue purposes or fire mitigation
3.11.2 Interpretive programs tell the story Interpretation throughout of ranger(s) the Park. the at The and year the Park Environmental and Park provides incorporate lead visitors other the Education events on local a and history variety programs and of educational nature such components as: hikes and to
• • • Guided Guided Youth-oriented nature fitness walks hikes events
• • Stargazing Moonlight group bike rides
3.11.3 The hunting and Game as AZGFD Unit regulated Hunting is permitted 25M allows on by the archery AZGFD with AZGFD a shotgun according hunting Game Management only of to mule using A.R.S. deer, birdshot The Unit javelina, Park Map. during currently and specified rabbit. falls within hunting Dove and Region seasons quail 6,
A at applicable Commission valid the Park hunting Park contact rules license fees. and station All regulations, is hunters required or with must and and the comply Park Park each rules. supervisor hunter with the should most (or state his/her current his/her designee) version intention of and ARS, pay to AZFG hunt any
It a building a roadway; is mile illegal of or any and or other to a developed trespass revocable recreational on picnic offense private area area, to developed property. shoot developed a firearm for public campground, or bow use; or and to shooting arrow shoot within from, range, on, a quarter or occupied across of
Participation Hunting Study during that they (as the is hunted well not survey a as large in some period. the recreational Park. of In the The the previous most 2005-2006 component recent studies) survey (2012-2013) of the reported Park. year, The only Visitor no 2012-2013 visitors 0.4% Study of engaged visitors did ASU not Park record responded in hunting Visitor any
hunters hunting in during the Park. this time, although Park staff are aware of occasional visitors lawfully
3-34

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
When McDowell’s Park system. surveyed respondents This during question the agreed was 2007-2008 not that asked hunting Visitor in the was Study, 2012-2013 an appropriate approximately visitor activity study. twenty-two with the percent county’s of
Species This of important 13 category, of of Arizona’s aspects Economic developed of game/hunting wildlife-related and by Recreational AZGFD, species. represents recreation Importance The and the distribution economic the (SERI) distribution and of these recreational of consumer species importance influences spending
across hunters, habitat below. However the for the state. conservation. community, there Together, is currently and At the MMRP to economic AZGFD a there societal provide are and shift six recreational a known in realistic the way game view importance people species of the value as importance of listed and game interact in species the of game table with to
wildlife; and hiking includes fishing and with species other is more still that recreational a people are valuable found wanting resource activities in MMRP to view for bring and the wildlife within revenue AZGFD. 2 and mile into Hunting/fishing, hike proximity, the among local the that economy. wildlife wildlife; are of Table economic viewing, hunting 3-7
and https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife/planning/wildlifeguidelines/statusdefinitions/ recreation Importance.
Scientific Callipepla Odocoileus Species of Name gambelii Economic hemionus and Recreation Common Gambel's Mule Deer Importance Quail Name Category Bird Mammal Statewide, spend economic to the $958 state impact anglers million, of of Arizona. and $1.34 creating hunters billion This an
Pecari Puma Zenaida Zenaida concolor tajacu asiatica macroura Javelina Mountain White-winged Mourning Lion Dove Dove Mammal Mammal Bird Bird spending jobs, $314 and generates million provides supports in salary more residents over and than 17,000 wages with $58
Since September Table 3-7: the Species 24, 2012 of 2016 Economic statewide be recognized and Recreation survey, as Importance Arizona Hunting Governor and Fishing million Doug Day in Ducey for state the tax proclaimed State revenue.35 of Arizona. that
This Additionally, $132 million proclamation in this state spending boasted tax revenue.36 supports economic over impact 18,220 statistics local jobs to and be provides closer to approximately $1.2 billion.
According million (or to 43% AZGFD, of the fishing statewide and total) hunting in expenditures within Maricopa (or $515 County million accounts using an for economic $409.1
wordpress/PortalImages/files/wildlife/FISHING_HUNTING%20Report.pdf 35 36 accessed Arizona State of November Game Arizona and Proclamation, 26, Fish 2018. Department, https://azgovernor.gov/sites/default/files/proc_huntingandfishingday2016 Economic Impact, https://s3.amazonaws.com/azgfd-portal- as accessed November 26, 2018. as
3-35

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
$103 impact million multiplier and provides effect). $21.1 Salary million and wages in state of tax the revenue.37 5,382 outdoor industry professionals is about
3.12 3.12.1 Ownership Land Ownership Use & Jurisdiction
Of Department acquired the 21,099 through between acres, the just 1980 R&PP over and 3,373 process 1987. acres However, in of the Park 1960s, the land other was 1970s, acquired approximate and through 1980s. 17,725 the The acres State R&PP were Land is
administered public The Park purposes. has by not the All acquired land BLM uses and any authorizes must additional comply the lands with sale the or since lease R&PP 1987. of Act38 public Appendix and lands the G for patents details recreational as land issued. use. or
The Department holds these areas as patents (Table 3-8; Figure 3-19):
Table Type Federal 3-8: Patent Distribution (02-64-0090) of Land Ownership Dec-1963 Date Acres 627.20
Federal Federal Federal Patent Patent Patent (02-65-0027) (02-71-0043) (02-71-0086) June-1971 Aug-1964 Dec-1970 15,740.74 653.24 627.36
Federal State State of of AZ AZ Patent (6765) (6766) (02-82-0022) Jan-1982 1980 1980 556.82 634.72 77.02
State State State of of of AZ AZ AZ (6763) (6768) (6764) 1980 1980 1980 625.04 116.61 640.00
State State Total of of Park AZ AZ (6767) (7263) acres: 1980 1987 21,098.71 640.00 160.00
37 38 https://www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/uploads/Media_Library_BLM_Policy_h2740-1.pdf http://www.azgfd.gov/pdfs/w_c/FISHING_HUNTING%20Report.pdf, Arizona BLM, Recreation Game and and Fish Public Department, Purposes The Act, Economic Importance of Fishing page 30-31, and Hunting, as accessed as November accessed 26, November 2018.
26, 2018.
3-36

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure 3-19: Land Ownership
Jurisdiction McDowell jurisdictions Mountain (Table 3-9) Regional or service Park areas: is located within or adjacent to the following
Table Political Legislative 3-9: Unit Jurisdictions District 23
Congressional Maricopa Maricopa Municipal County County Board Parks Commission of Supervisors 6 2 2
Town City School of of Scottsdale Districts Fountain (traffic, Hills (traffic, planning, planning, etc.) etc.) adjacent adjacent
Fountain Scottsdale Law Enforcement Hills District District adjacent adjacent
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Services
3-37

3.12.2 Existing ________________________________________________________________ Existing Land Use Land Use and Zoning Resource Analysis
Much zoned 20). located The of for within the land residential lands north an unincorporated adjacent and or northeast are or undeveloped near area of the the of Park’s Park Maricopa and is north, largely utilized County. east, under for and Lands residential private south to the boundaries, ownership development east and (Figure are southeast either and 3- is
belong approximately to the Fort 39 square McDowell miles. Yavapai Nation, which today stands at about 24,680 acres or
The undeveloped unit)39 scale State development located of land Arizona near (zoned such the owns southeast as R-190 hotels, two for adjacent corner community rural zoning of parcels the centers, district Park. totaling R-190 nature – 190,000 approximately is reserves, typically square utilized Parks, feet 1,232 per or for dwelling acres schools. larger of
The information were ASLD land purchased and within currently is currently and these remains proposed two available large undeveloped. to parcels be regarding developed are The interested subject as Town’s a resort to parties. disposal planning which In by boundary later the the past, reverted ASLD; the covers however, two back the parcels to area the no
of Statistical lodging, West land of south and these Report the of majority the residential (2017)41 Park. as The identifies residential zoning Town’s these areas General lots lands including: near Plan as the a 201040 mix low, southwest of medium, and open the space corner Land and areas, high Use of density Analysis the commercial, Park plots. and is
approximately Preserve. MMRP to the The north Fountain 740 and acres Scottsdale’s Hills of land McDowell associated McDowell Mountain with Sonoran the Preserve Fountain Preserve connects to Hills‘ the McDowell northwest. directly with Mountain both
A directly managed mission large portion West is cooperatively to be and of a adjacent leader the McDowell’s in with to urban the the Park. preserve lay McDowell within This preserve management the Sonoran 30,580 is owned Conservancy. acre through McDowell by the excellent City The Sonoran of stewardship Scottsdale conservancy’s Preserve and of
the lands.
39 40 Plan 41 Maricopa Fountain Town of Fountain Hills County General Assessor’s Hills Plan – Land 2010, Office Use Adopted Analysis https://maps.mcassessor.maricopa.gov/ January & Statistical 7, 2010. Report, https://www.fh.az.gov/224/Fountain-Hills-General- 2017. as viewed on 12/10/2018.
https://www.fh.az.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3844/2017-Land-Use-Analysis-PDF
3-38

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure Zoning 3-20: Existing Land Use
The parcels properties area immediately within have mining Park outside boundaries exemptions. of Park is zoned boundaries R-190 are by zoned Maricopa RU-43 County. or RU-190 The unincorporated on which some
• • RU-43 farm RU-190 protects and (Rural (Rural farm agricultural Residential): and Residential): agricultural uses and one one uses permits dwelling dwelling and recreational permits unit42 unit43 per per recreational 43,000 190,000 and institutional square square and institutional feet feet uses. - protects -
Land Yavapai undeveloped use Nation uses. surrounding and lands, natural and the regardless undeveloped Park is of a mix its state current of trust residential, zoning land, but, category.44 preserve much of land, The the Preserve area Fort is McDowell currently west of
42 accessed 43 https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4785/Maricopa-County-Zoning-Ordinance-PDF?bidId= Maricopa Maricopa December County County Zoning Zoning 22, 2018. Ordinance, Ordinance, Chapter Chapter 5 5 Rural Rural Zoning Zoning Districts, Districts, Pages Pages 13-15 1-11 of of 15. 15. as
accessed 44 Plan https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4785/Maricopa-County-Zoning-Ordinance-PDF?bidId= Fountain December Hills General 22, 2018. Plan 2010, Adopted January 7, 2010. https://www.fh.az.gov/224/Fountain-Hills-General- as
3-39

the while Fountain Park ________________________________________________________________ unincorporated, falls Hills within planning the fall area City under of abuts Scottsdale’s the the Rio southern Verde planning Community boundary area. The and planning area southeast north area. Resource and corner The northwest Town Analysis of the of
Park. 3.12.3 The adjacent land entire bordering Future to western the east Land the Park boundary north Use boundary and is south owned is shared Park by the boundaries with Fort the McDowell Preserve is privately Yavapai and the owned majority Nation. and Much of zoned the of land the for
residential the development development Park is development. held purposes. surrounding in trust Other Two the by quarter jurisdictions ASLD Park. Land and sections could have use of maps planning land be sold located are or documents not leased near zoning the at in maps; southeast market place they to value corner facilitate merely for of
reflect standards the at general a specific desired site. use of the area rather than specific zoning/development
Maricopa Privately unincorporated housing density owned County Maricopa to parcel(s) (unincorporated protect County the just agricultural and outside areas) are currently of or and rural the Private Parks character zoned Property northern RU-43 of the and boundary area. RU-190 This which is and subject within limits to
change City of Scottsdale pending any new zoning or variance applications.
The remain outlines boundary City in of the effect and Scottsdale preferred the until rural a General new land residential general use Plan specifically 2001 plan /tourism is was approved ratified as resort it relates by designated in March voters. to preserve 2002 Page lands by 73 near City of lands Scottsdale’s voters the on northwest the and west plan will
corner outlines of goals the Park. and approaches Additionally, for a those full chapter areas. on Open Space and Recreation (page 109)
Town The desire southeast Town of to Fountain corner see of Fountain the of Hills two the Hills Park, quarter General be developed section Plan 2010 parcels for (adopted both of residential undeveloped January and 2010) land resort/ outlines located tourism the near Towns uses. the
The including Town’s designating plan also the identifies natural washes the need open for space open for space, those recreation, opportunities. and connectivity
Arizona As are within stated currently the State above, Town’s vacant Land the planning Department lands but subject just boundary. southeast to (ASLD) purchase of The the and visions, Park future boundary goals development. and are objectives owned These by two the discussed ASLD areas and fall in
Chapter open space 6 - Open needs Space as they Element, pertain outlines to these the Town’s two (2) desire undeveloped to establish sections recreation of land. and
3-40

Additionally, connectivity ________________________________________________________________ from the the Department Park to the and future the community Town are in interested this area via in a public creating Resource trailhead. recreational Analysis
3.13 Most yellow infrastructure of Facilities boxes the Park’s in found Figure existing and in this 3-21) Infrastructure development portion of the of the Park. occurs Park Figure and within is 3-21 further three outlines discussed (3) main the areas major within (located facilities this section. in and the
Figure 3.13.1 3-21: Entrance Existing Station Park Facilities
The the southeast main entrance side of and the contact Park and station is the is Park’s located primary off of entrance. McDowell Mountain Park Drive on
3.13.2 The provides, souvenirs. wildlife. Nature Nature South the Interpretive Center Parks of Center the a recycled/converted administrative building displays is offer an outdoor offices Park mobile guests patio and office space space a chance building, to with purchase to mountain view which some retail opened views. of items the This in local 2005, and space native Park and is
often used for educational purposes by the Park interpretive ranger.
3-41

3.13.3 ________________________________________________________________ Maintenance Compound Resource Analysis
Once A maintenance Surface fueling inside drainage station, the compound. Park, flows vehicle Thomas from The storage asphalt the Thumb west area, paved Drive side tools, provides compound of and the other compound access is surrounded equipment to the to the maintenance is by east. housed a chain One compound. within (1) link 6,000- fence. the
gallon secondary leak. double containment wall unleaded sensor, gasoline access tank port, is vent, located and on emergency site. The warning tank is equipped light in case with of a a
A the discharge Department construction compound. permit of Environmental wash This will drain area need slab may to Quality and be be drainage utilized renewed (ADEQ). as sump every a wash is five located rack (5) near for years vehicles; the though southeast however, the corner Arizona the of
A compound releases 1,250-gallon into just a leach outside septic field tank the directly fence and clean northwest opposite out of are of the the located two tank core location. near volunteer the northeast sites. The corner septic of tank the
All which into storm the flows underground water east runoff from rock the from pit site the located or site into southeast leaves the wash the of rack site the and outside one spill of two of control the ways: compound. drains runoff and sheet thereby flow
For Safety maintenance, Data Sheets inspection, (SDS) sheets and and spill the control spill containment measures kit. for this area, refer to the onsite
A the station 100,000 compound located gallon which near steel the receives plate northeast ring its wall water corner water from of the reservoir Rio Park. Verde is Utilities located Inc., at the supplied southwest by the corner pump of
3.13.4 MMRP within ramadas those currently Picnic are available areas. Areas offers Ramadas on three a first-come, may reservable be reserved first-served picnic for ramadas a basis. fee. If All not with picnic marked a sites total as are of reserved, 15 considered picnic all tables picnic day-
use throughout basis. only; Table all the 3-10 have developed describes restrooms areas each picnic nearby. of the ramada. Park Additionally, that may be there utilized are on over a first-come-first-serve 100 picnic tables
3-42

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Table Ramada 1 Small & 2 3-10: Covered Description On 1 On large the the north east grill Picnic side and side Ramadas share of of the the a staging large staging fire area, area, ring. has this For 1 area picnic a total has table, of two 8 tables, one ramadas large this grill each area and has can a 4 seat fire picnic ring. about tables This 48-64. and area
Group can On and the the two seat 2 large north campground about grills side 6-8. and of the loops. a fire Thom’s ring. Thumb This ramada Drive, is has closest 6 picnic to the tables Playground and can located seat about between 36-48,
3.13.5 The trailer area from 1967 for running attached, Campgrounds a tent MP water or designated and trailer, and trailer picnic a approximately comfort detached table, station. fireplace sites. 1,097 Individual Within grill, acres and those campsites for are designated located camping would not which 1,097 more include included than acres, a 300 cleared nearly tent, feet
6,582 utilized camper’s Vehicle individual (RV) for access tent camping camping to camping. a range as well sites The of as camping would the 1967 prime have MP types landscape been acknowledges from incorporated; basic to offer tent the this to the importance type developed majority of recreation. of of Recreational those providing Today sites
MMRP offers campsites. 80 is one RV Campground camp of the sites, most as sought amenities well as after group include RV camp, camping access youth parks to camp, out a dump semi-developed, of all of station the regional along and parks primitive with and the
following • Developed: without as per showers, the includes Department’s picnic electricity, table, Camping and water, a grill/pit. Policy: and is in close proximity to restrooms with or
• • Semi-Developed: within Primitive: areas with close may no proximity, utilities include may or have picnic picnic plumbed shade, table, tables, restrooms. and plumbed and a grill/pit. grill/pit. restrooms These campsites with or without are generally showers in
• RV tables, occasionally Core and Volunteer grills. be available These Sites: to sites Include rent. are shade, reserved electrical/water/sewer for camp core volunteers, hookups, but picnic may
Campsites campgrounds sites by phone. can be All are reserved provide campground still either not various considered online (with amenities or the by exclusive exception to phone. accommodate Reservations to of one the differing type youth for of tent and camping camping; camp group types. sites camp the are RV various areas) taken camp
restrooms Youth and adult-supervised. other Camp offer youth Area flush groups The (Developed toilets Youth under and Camp the showers. in Area the age early offers of 18 1970s) 1.5 years acres (up – of This to primitive 100 area people). is camping used for Groups scout must groups be
3-43

. four potable Site (4) amenities ________________________________________________________________ picnic water tables can include: be and obtain two three (2) via (3) grills, a Port-A-Johns. water a large spicket fire Running ring, located two water near (2) shade is the not center structures, available; Resource of the however, flagpole, Analysis camp.
Additionally, equipped with the restrooms day use (shower trailheads facilities and hiking are not trails available located yet). on Asher View Drive are
North North two hookups, (2) Loop Loop core picnic Campground Campground volunteer table and sites (Figure barbeque (Developed all 3-22) with grill has water at in 38 each campsites 1985) and site, electrical – close The and
proximity station. camping. located at Two This either to the (2) campground end playground, free of standing the loop as is restroom/shower along well considered Thom’s as access Thumb to "developed" houses the Drive. dump are
South South electrical playground, Loop Loop hookups, Campground as Campground well picnic as has access table (Developed 36 campsites and to the barbeque dump in and 1991) two station. grill (2) at – core each The This volunteers, site, Figure campground close 3-22: all RV proximity Back-in with is considered water space to and the
"developed" ends of Whitehead camping. Way Two and (2) two free (2) standing are located restroom/shower along the outside houses loop roads. are located at both
Group Parking restrooms grill, and Campground area a with large can flush fire accommodate ring toilets, (Developed for a campfires. covered 30 RV in units 1958) ramada This for area – with day The also six use three serves (6) or overnight picnic (3) as an acre tables, overflow Group camping. a large camping Campground It barbecue features area
during Tent developed individual Camping the busy for tent day season. pads, at use Asher in picnic the Circle early table, 1970s) and fire Palo pit, – The and Verde Tent grill. Camping (Developed Restrooms Area with provides in 2010 flush thirteen - toilets Originally (13) are
typically Four considered Peaks located an Staging event within staging Area 500 feet area (Developed of that every allows site in (Figure for 1997) primitive 3-23). – The camping. Four Peaks Many Staging of the multi-day Area is
event participants set up camp at this location (Figure 3-24).
Figure 3-23: Dispersed Camping Figure 3-24: Four Peaks Staging Area
3-44

Other overflow approximately ________________________________________________________________ camping camping 0.30 areas space. acres – Both in When size group and necessary, camp includes sites the two can Trailhead (2) be shade rented Staging structures, out as Area, well. picnic Resource Minks is utilized table, Camp Analysis grill, for is
ring which fire accommodate pit fire sits and pit, at and a about single up a to single 0.10 a Port-A-John. 45' acres Port-A-John. RV and in size are Park’s and The considered core includes second volunteers of "Developed a the shade smaller are structure, provided Sites" group with picnic camps with water, table, is sites Eagle septic grill, that Camp ring and can
an Backcountry electrical hookup, Camping as well as a picnic table, barbecue, and fire ring.
Overnight fires and pack backpacking, out what is with packed a permit, in. is allowed. This is for “low impact” camping; i.e., no
3.13.6 The 2013 north expected Park (Figure and Playground renovated that south 3-25). the campground The an playground old Park playground has loops. one will With playground be with the relocated new construction nature which to is themed the currently of new a new playscape nature located nature equipment between center center, site. it the in is
Improvements new shade, nature and seating. center to the and equipment will complete are also the expected playscape to occur experience during with the construction additional pieces, of the
Playgrounds playground ensure Figure each 3-25: inspector playground are Campground inspected from is safe Playground regularly the and Park’s compliant by Equipment Park Department staff with for safety inspects obvious standards. signs the playground of Inspection disrepair. annually, reports A certified are to
kept 3.13.7 on Staging file at MMRP’s and Event administrative Areas office.
MMRP each area; year. the is Trailhead considered The Park staging has a destination three area; (3) and main and the events Competitive areas park utilized due Track for to events: the staging many the area. events Four In FY18, Peaks that between are staging held
3-45

September of multi-day nearly ________________________________________________________________ 10,000 events 2017 and participates and May included 2018, registered. over-night the Park Of issued camping. those 32 32 Special All planned three Use (3) events, Permits staging 19 (SUPs) areas were Resource have with considered Analysis a access total
to anticipated shade, restrooms to have electricity with flush brought toilets, to and the potable site by 2020. water. The Four Peaks staging area is
3.13.8 The connection the northeast Park Potable receives to corner a six-inch Water its just potable diameter west water of the water from Rio main Verde Rio pipeline. Verde Community, Utilities The pipeline feeding Inc., via enters into a six-inch a pump the Park diameter station. near
Two eccentric main compound. (2) to vertical reducer, a The 100,000 main turbine past gallon pipeline a pressure pumps steel traverses add gage. walled pressure The east water water thru to the reservoir is the then water Campground pushed and located send through at where it the through a six-inch maintenance it eventually a 6”x water 4”
connects road have been throughout with installed McDowell the in Park. various Mountain As-built locations Park drawings and Road connect show and to continues that the several six-inch north two-inch waterline.45 and south diameter along feeds that
3.13.9 MMRP Link. intersection Both receives Electrical electrical of McDowell its electricity and Mountain telecom from Salt Park enter River Road the Project and Park McDowell (SRP). from the Telecom Mountain Main is entry provided Road. located by Century at the
3.13.10 MMRP were facilities estimated built was Asset have lifespan, in the the been Inventory fourth 1960s Park renovated regional through management in county 1980s the last can Park and five better are established, years. showing plan By budgets and their assigning as age; for such, the however, each many years building Park a when number facilities type major an of
repairs or existing lifecycle or infrastructure; replacements terms, management this are appendix estimated will section have to occur. to is decide to Regarding be updated whether building(s) and to replaced renovate expected as or needed. replace usefulness, the
For which structures, 2060. example, Another were it both can the highly most be rebuilt estimated visible visible in asset 2010/2011. Park that to assets both the will Park are With need the is the a monument replacement 50-year nature center useful sign or and (purchased/placed extensive lifespan the entrance for renovation these station from two by
another which MMRP Environmental was is County the previously only Design Department county owned (LEED) park in and that certified 2005). operated does This nature not out building have of center. by a newly the consists (Appendix Maricopa built of Leadership a County triple H contains wide Coroner’s in mobile Energy a full Office. asset unit and
inventory for MMRP).
45 McDowell Mountain Park Improvements Phase 9, Utility Infrastructure Report, February 1985.
3-46

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
3.14 Nearly population Socioeconomics 40% characteristics of the state’s in more residents detail live at the in state, Maricopa county, County. and Park This levels. section compares
3.14.1 The from outnumber 2018 the Population US Census men 2000 in reveals census46) the Characteristics State that with and the County; 4,307,03347 State of and Arizona women residing has also in 7,171,646 Maricopa outnumber people County. men (a as Women 28.5% visitors increase slightly to the
Park. wide, Table There 3-11. the median were 443,971 age was households 34.6 years with compared people to under 42.5 the for age the of Park. 1848 This years is old. detailed County- in
Table Population by Sex/Age 3-11: Population State of Arizona1 and Park Maricopa Visitor Characteristics County1 McDowell (2007-2008)2 MRP McDowell (2012-2013)3 MRP
Total Population 6,392,017 3,817,117 Visitors 76,423 Visitors 66,126
Male Female 3,175,823 (49.6%) 3,216,194 (50.0%) 1,888,465 1,928,652 (49.5%) (50.5%) (68.4%) (31.6%) (45%) (52%)
Under 18 20 25 - - & 24 34 over 18 1,629,014 4,763,003 442,584 856,693 1,007,861 2,809,256 266,872 541,126 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
35 50 65 Median - - & 49 64 over Age 1,249,516 1,141,752 881,831 35.9 786,104 640,768 462,641 34.6 n/a n/a n/a 45.91 n/a n/a n/a 46.75
1 2 3 Note: n/a Source: ASU ASU = data totals Park Park https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/tables.html not Visitor Visitor may available not Study Study equal for and and 100% direct visitation visitation due comparison to for for rounding. 2012-2013. 2007-2008.
The Study from most 93.4% were noticeable among in 2007-2008); the differences following: and in 93.5% 3.0% race or of as ethnicity Park Hispanic visitors during (down self-identified the slightly 2012-2013 from as white ASU 3.9% Park (up in slightly Visitor 2007-
2008).49 46 47 number As Population result to nine of and the for population Housing the state. Unit increase, Estimates, Arizona Maricopa gained County, one member Vintage to 2017 the House Population of Representatives, Estimates, bringing the
48 publications.html 49 https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/tables.html 2010 2012-2013 US Census ASU as Park Bureau, accessed Visitor https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade/decennial- Study December Final 15, Report, 2018. page 232. as accessed December 15, 2018.
3-47

3.14.2 ________________________________________________________________ Census Tracts Resource Analysis
The 9807, estimate Maricopa 2168.43, of over County 2168.51, 30, 300 census people50 2168.49, tracts (Figure 2168.19, that include 3-26). 2168.20, or are and adjacent 9412) to have the Park a total (tracts population 101.01,
3.14.3 Figure 3-26: Population Population Growth Forecast via Census Track
In Projections; Regional roughly the Maricopa 25% Analysis Population, over Association the Zone” 2015 Housing, (June base of Governments 2016),51Maricopa population and Employment by (MAG) the year County document by 2050. Municipal is forecasted This entitled means Planning “Socioeconomic to that increase the Area region and by
will The 100,000 experience Scottsdale people, a Municipal requiring growth of the just Planning Park under to Area one pay million close (MPA) attention people alone during is to projected growth each in decade. to the grow eastern by part nearly of
the metro-area. Those MPA’s closest to the Park are shown in Table 3-12.
50 accessed 51 Socioeconomic-Projections_June-2016_FINAL.pdf U.S. Socioeconomic Census December https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk Projections. 15, 2018. June 2016. http://www.azmag.gov/Portals/0/Documents/2016-06-23_2016-MAG- as
3-48

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Table (July 1, 3-12: 2010 Total and Projections Resident 2010 Population July 1, 2020 2020 to July 1, 2050) 2030 2040 2050
Fountain Hills Scottsdale 231,300 23,300 255,000 26,000 290,800 28,300 308,700 30,400 312,000 32,600
Fort McDowell Yavapai 1000 1000 1000 1100 1100
Nation County Total 3,823,900 4,507,200 5,359,300 6,175,000 7,410,800
Source: 23_2016-MAG-Socioeconomic-Projections_June-2016_FINAL.pdf MAG, Socioeconomic Projections, June 2016. http://azmag.gov/Portals/0/Documents/2016-06- as accessed January 7, 2019.
3.14.4 The the County Bureau State Employment, residents of of Arizona Labor have and had Income, attained Statistics.52 an unemployment a and bachelor’s U.S. Educational Census rate degree of data 4.7% Attainment or also higher; in shows November over that 2% 31.4% 2018 higher according of Maricopa than the to
state above as the a whole. statewide Likewise, median the (Table median 3-13). household income was $58,580 which is over $5,070
Table Population 3-13: Employment State Arizona1 of and Education Maricopa County1 McDowell (2007-2008)2 MRP McDowell (2012-2013)3 MRP
Employed Median income household 1,374,222 53,510 889,499 58,580 49.3% 25% $120,000) (More than 59.9% 31.4% $120,000) (More than
College coursework Bachelor’s or higher degree 1,143,553 1,284,657 666,344 858,772 63.8% 24.7% School Bachelors Graduate 45.9% 48.7 School Graduate Bachelors
(graduate 1 accessed 2 3 US ASU ASU Census Park Park June Visitor Visitor Bureau, school) 18, 2015. Study, Study, State 2012-2023, 2007-2008, and County page page Quick 205. 143. Facts, http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/04/04013.html as
52 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/eag/eag.az.htm as accessed January 7, 2019.
3-49

3.14.5 ________________________________________________________________ Obesity Resource Analysis
The were Department overweight Centers either (40.0%) overweight of for Public Disease or Health obese (34.2%) Control reports (22.9%) or and obese that Prevention between 62.9% (29%) 2006 of in reports adults the and year 201054. that in 2016.53 Maricopa 63.2% The of County adults Maricopa were in Arizona County either
3.15 The or visitors equal State Visitation were to of roughly Arizona domestic 120,465 attracted and travelers Tourism visitors 43.97 and per 13% million Trends day were domestic in 2017.55 international and Of those international travelers.56 visitors, overnight 87% Domestic of overnight visitors visitors
were per visit.57 approximately 43.6 years old, stayed in Arizona for 3.5 nights, and spent over $645
3.15.1 During 2.5% Arizona were fiscal Residency58 (77%), from year predominantly out (FY) of 2012-2013, the country59 coming 13.9% from (Figure of the the 3-27). metropolitan Park’s Most visitors Park area were visitors and from driving are out residents of an state average and of
of 81.38 • • Scottsdale Phoenix miles60 18.7% to 21.2% arrive at the Park. The top five metro-area locations include:
• • • Fountain Gilbert Mesa 5.4% 5.4% Hills 10.3%
Services, Health https://nccd.cdc.gov/dnpao_dtm/rdPage.aspx?rdReport=DNPAO_DTM.ExploreByLocation&rdRequestForwarding= 53 Nutrition, Promotion, Centers Physical for Division Activity Disease of and Control Nutrition, Obesity and Physical Data, Prevention Trends Activity (CDC), and and Maps National Obesity. web Center site. Available U.S. for Department Chronic at Disease of Health Prevention and Human and
Form 54 https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/40794/Recommendations_for_Maricopa_County_Health_Asse ssment_Abt_Associates_2012 55 Maricopa Arizona Office County of Tourism, Community https://tourism.az.gov/research-statistics/economic-impact as Health accessed Assessment December 2012, 14, 2018. Page 10. as accessed December
12, 56 57 https://tourism.az.gov/sites/default/files/AOT%20Quarterly%20visitor%20tracking%202017Q4.pdf, December Arizona Arizona 2018. Office Office 12, 2018. of of Tourism, Tourism, as accessed
58 59 60 https://tourism.az.gov/sites/default/files/Arizona%20Visitor%20Profile%202017%20v.%202016.pdf, December 2012-2013 2012-2013 2012-2013 12, ASU ASU ASU 2018. Park Park Park Visitor Visitor Visitor Study Study Study Final Final Final Report, Report, Report, page page Question 32, 32, table table 5, page 1.18. 1.18. 234. as accessed
3-50

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure 3-27: Visitor Residency
3.15.2 During 10 fiscal fiscal years FY Park years 2012-2013, with Visitation (Figure the average 59,089 3-28). holding visitors Park visitation at entered about 75,527 has the Park, fluctuated visitors the lowest over greatly the visitation over past ten the out years. previous of the last 10
Figure 3-28: Visitation by Fiscal Year
3-51

Visitation temperatures exception ________________________________________________________________ of can December usually fluctuate result when for in a a November good variety portion of through reasons of the March seasonal and being in visitors the the busiest case leave of months Resource for MMRP, the holidays with Analysis cooler the
and held August return between when after temperatures October the New and Year. soar March. Nearly (Figure The all 3-29). months of the events with the the Park’s lowest hold visitation during are the July year and are
Figure Forecasting analysis trend 3-29: line indicates Visitation applied future per a in visitation positive fiscal Figure month trend 3-30). carries within line This fiscal with to year estimate future it its visitation of own future uncertainties; (as visitation shown by does preliminary the not exponential take trend into
account solely on any past Park visitation improvement data and proposals standard mentioned spreadsheet later trend in line this functions. master plan and is based
Figure 3-30: Actual and forecasted (exponential trend line) visitation per fiscal year
3-52

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
3.16 This ASU and section Park as reported describes Use and in the Park Visitor 2012-2013 visitor attitudes, Preferences Park Visitor preferences, Study Final or use Report. patterns as gathered by
3.16.1 About hours. of visitors 93% This Day that of is and up visitors camped, from Overnight were 2.66 the hours in average Use61, the reported Park 62 stay for was a in “day the 2.97 use” 2007-2008 nights activity, (up visitor spending from use 2.66 an survey. nights average Of in the of 2007- 2.97 7%
2008). According day day survey users users years. verse leading to the overnight Department’s to a 28% users increase Point indicates of of Sale over that (POS) about night system, campers 65% of the all compared FY18 visitors analytics were to the in obtained the 2012-2013 Park for as
3.16.2 Park photography, the primary primary visitors Primary activities activity, mountain engage Activity63 in 2012-2013 or in biking, what a range the nature were: of visitor activities study, specifically and during more); came their one to visit activity the (trail Park is to usually hiking, do. The considered picnicking, top five
• • • • Mountain Trail Special Horseback hiking Event biking riding (29.2%) (9.6%) (58.9%) (7.2%)
3.16.3 • Photography Return Visits (6.7%)
Seventy-eight nearly visitors responses 21.4 to included return times percent on to the the average (78%) Park Park, in being of trail-related the those previous close surveyed to responses twelve home, were the months64. were return competitive most When visitors, common; track, asked visiting and what other the the prompts written Parks Park
wildlife Return mountain from when visits viewing bikers the based opportunities.65 survey returned on activity was twenty-seven conducted revealed (both that (27) runners/joggers times by far within the highest the made last mean 41 twelve return averages (12) visits months in and the
61 62 63 64 65 2012-2013 2012-2013 2012-2013 2012-2013 ASU ASU ASU ASU Park Park Park Park Visitor Visitor Visitor Visitor Study Study Study Study Final Final Final Final Report, Report, Report, Report, Question Question Question Question 1, 4, 4, 6, page page page page 232. 232 232. 232.
2012-2013 ASU Park Visitor Study Final Report, Question 7b, page 247.
3-53

system). horseback ________________________________________________________________ Hikers riders averaged made over about 13 seven return (7) visits return in visits.66 the previous twelve (12) Resource months Analysis and
3.16.4 Visitors takers included: Reasons come to the for Use67 Park for a variety of reasons, the top reasons identified by survey
• • • • Enjoy Observe Improve Enjoy physical the the my sounds scenic physical exercise and beauty health smells of nature
• • To To experience experience the or do open something space. new
3.16.5 When extremely identified asked Satisfaction in satisfied the about lower their and three level 27% categories.68 of were satisfaction very satisfied with the with Park, the 73% Park; of those no responses surveyed were were
3.16.6 Park and Park. about visitors Nearly Attachment 75.6% often 68% of form agreed the to strong Park Parks that attachments visitors the Park agreed means to their that a lot favorite they to them; are, Park indeed, 70% or locations agreed very attached that within this to a Park Park this
offers of and the the the Park Park’s best included views. settings many and trail-related facilities for responses, the activities specifically that they mentioning enjoy most.69 Pemberton Favorite parts Trail
3.16.7 The group the drop 2012-2013 for Visitor over their the visit Spending ASU years, to Visitor the MMRP and Park Use Economic Survey (down is significantly shows significantly Impact that higher visitors from than $397.50 reported the system-wide in spending 2007-2008). $309.38 average Despite per of
$157.63 In system. other 2014, data Impacts per the into visit. Department IMPLAN© were 70 estimated asked software ASU by to to inputting determine study the operating multiple economic expenses, types impacts71 of impacts. visitor of the spending, MMRP County ranked Park and
Important. 66 67 68 2012-2013 2012-2013 2012-2013 ASU ASU ASU Park Park Park Visitor Visitor Visitor Study Study Study Final Final Final Report, Report, Report, Table Question Question 3.4 1, 6, page page page 88. 234. 235 Responses of Important and Extremely
69 70 71 Maricopa 2012-2013 2012-2013 2014 MARICOPA County ASU ASU Parks Park Park COUNTY Visitor Visitor and Recreation PARKS Study Study AND Final Final System, RECREATION Report, Report, Chhabra, Question Question DEPARTMENT et 8, 7, al. page page 237 236. STUDY and REPORT Table 2.9, Economic page 59. Impact of the
3-54

third impacts highest ________________________________________________________________ and in out operating of all of expenses the Maricopa (Table County 3-14). Regional Parks in visitor spending Resource Analysis related
Table Park Full-time level 3-14: jobs Economic created Impact Based on Visitor Visitor Spending Spending 16.0 and Operating Operating Expenses Expenses 12.4
Total System-wide Full-time Total economic economic jobs created impact impact $1,374,465.10 $11,310,284 138.9 $1,430,856.01 $12,864,318 116.4
3.16.8 Park 2013 informational visitors survey, Importance were displays restrooms, surveyed and or kiosks parking Use about of were Park which availability, the Facilities facilities most trail important are mileage most important features signs, at multi-use to the them. Park. In trails, the The 2012- least and
important When outdoor visitors education facilities were seminars were: surveyed playground, (in-depth), about what showers, Park facilities programs, equestrian they would special facilities, be interest likely Park to programming camp use, sites72 if provided, (i.e.
stargazing, responses. mountain 73 bike yoga, The rentals, facilities etc.), special horses that events, they for rent/stables, would and guided not use WiFi tours/programs, or connection/hotspots, don’t know if rounded they would and out mobile the use top were: apps. five
3.17 MMRP trails, activities. wildlife Local has The a unique Park Recreation, viewing, also opportunity offers picnicking, educational Needs, to hunting, offer and and visitors and interpretive Opportunities other camping, opportunities events competitive on a regular as tracks, approved basis. multi-use Many Park
of opportunities these activities near MMRP cannot include be found (Table elsewhere 3-15 and Figure in the 3-31): community. Other recreational
Table Facility McDowell Park 3-15: Mountain Local Recreational Ranch Opportunities Distance from ~5 miles Park Acres of n/a trails / Miles Recreational Aquatics, splash pad, sports Skateboard Opportunities fields or Park, turf fitness areas,
center, and more.
72 73 2012-2013 2012-2013 ASU ASU Park Park Visitor Visitor Study Study Final Final Report, Report, Question Question 4, 10, page page 252. 256.
3-55

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
City Preserve George of Scottsdale Cavalliere – Park Sonoran Adjacent (west) ~3.77 miles 30,580 34 loop acres/1mile acres Mountain riding, Basketball, archery biking, hiking, hunting hiking, and playground horseback
Pinnacle Town Space, of Botanical Fountain Peak Park Garden, Hills – and Open ~5 ~2 miles miles 150 miles 100 acres/1.75 + acres Hiking Nature walking Trails, paths, open playgrounds, turf, hiking, tennis and
four Town McDowell local of Fountain Parks Mountain Hills Preserve – Adjacent (south) 16,000 acres/11.5 basketball Mountain biking courts, and Dog hiking Park, and more
Tonto National Forest ~2 miles miles 3 million acres Mountain riding, cultural camping, sites. biking, Needle nature hiking, Rock watching, horseback Recreation
Additional recreational opportunities: Area, Bartlett Recreation Horseshoe Lake Area, Recreation Dam etc. Campground, Area, Sutton
Undeveloped these areas requires Camping: a permit Camping from is the allowed Forest on Service. National Forest lands throughout the area. Camping on in
Figure 3-31: Recreation Opportunities
3-56

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
3.18 This within section Park the Park’s provides Administration annual a business brief overview plan. and of Special Park staffing. Functions Additional detail may be found
3.18.1 Currently, supervisor, maintenance Staffing the one workers. Park (1) administrative is The staffed Park by currently assistant, five (5) has full-time one one (1) (1) interpretive part-time employees. employee. ranger, This includes and two the (2) Park Park
A park performance coordinates park while supervisor protecting activities of subordinates plans, for park organizes, maximum resources. to facilitate coordinates revenue This productivity position and and most is supervises and responsible efficient efficiency. all for utilization aspects The all operations park of of supervisor work facilities of and the
including responsible providing projects and outdoor detail for park marketing for projects. education formulation efforts and wellness to of promote budget programs as the related park, for operating park to grants, users. within capital This the position improvement budget is also and
An include deposits, support, administrative but processing reconciliation, not limited assistant camping revenue to: proper and performs recording ramada cash clerical handling reservations, and duties reporting, during in souvenir support fee administrative collection, program of park preparing oversight, reporting operations daily and and to
customer An recreation interpretive service and via environmental ranger the phone, plans, mail organizes, educational and email. promotes, programs conducts, to include and evaluates maintaining outdoor and
demonstrations by public, Responsibilities assisting County and of providing also departments, live include animal information accurate and other plant reporting and agencies, displays. park interpretation of This volunteers, program position attendance, to provides and park community visitors, fee customer collection the general groups. service and
reconciliation, A limited external park maintenance to: structures, cleaning and occasional graffiti and worker maintaining removal, response performs minor restrooms, to general emergency plumbing facilities trash situations. and collection, management electrical painting repairs, to include, interiors fence but repair, and not
trail park maintenance visitors. and signage, desert landscaping maintenance, and customer service to
3.18.2 The volunteers, 16). The volunteers Volunteers Independent entrance in FY15-18 station Sector provided attendants, estimates over that nature 20,907 the value center hours of hosts, volunteer of service among time in other roles was roles worth such (Table as $24.51 core 3-
3-57

per $512,406.06 providing hour ________________________________________________________________ an for worth enormous the state of services economic of Arizona or value the in equivalent to 2018.74 the Park This of each almost translates year. nine (9) to full-time75 volunteers Resource employees, providing Analysis
Fiscal 2014-2015 Year Hours 2,796 Dollar $68,529.96 Value2* FTE3* 1.34
2015-2016 2016-2017 5,165 7,267 $126,569.64 $178,114.17 2.48 3.18
2017-20181* 1* 2* Arizona 3* Total Hourly Through (2017) Hours Wage 2.12.18 / of 2080 $ $24.51 = Full-time 5,679 based Equivalent on Independent (FTE) $139,192.29 Sector’s value of volunteer time 2.73 for the state of
Table Core providing through 3-16: Volunteers visitor Volunteer information education. value assist by and the fiscal promoting Park Duties year supervisor may resource include and protection serve fee collection, as ambassadors and recreational light maintenance to Park opportunities visitors work, by
clerical Core serving Volunteer(s) tasks, as core trail volunteers. is maintenance, allowed to utilize and special camping projects. sites and In return use Park for 40 facilities hours while of service, they are the
Service maintenance volunteering webpage76 volunteers for assistance. on more an details on-going may Service on provide basis. volunteer volunteers See administrative, roles the give Volunteer and their responsibilities. time trails, Manual, for education, a special Making project, special a Difference rather event, than and or
Episodic Organization competitive community volunteers and track of Arizona is one staging may of volunteers only assist area. three This in short-term, designed like recreation pump and tracks/ special activity constructed projects. bike is very Parks the For popular in pump example, the County. track amount Gravity located the Riders biking at the
3.18.3 MMRP Park’s roles in operation has Partnerships the identified operation and success. several and improvement partners Table 3-17 or of specifies other the Park. organizations existing and with potential a mutual partners interest and in their the
74 content/uploads/2016/05/Value-of-Volunteer-Time-by-State-2001-2017-1.pdf 75 76 Independent FTE Website = total and volunteer Volunteer Sector, dollar hours Manual value divided available by by state 2,080 here: for hours year http://www.maricopa.gov/Parks/volunteer.aspx 2017, (2,080 https://independentsector.org/wp- = 40 hours week * 52 as accessed weeks). February, 2018.
3-58

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Table Partner Maricopa 3-17: County Partnerships Agencies Potential MCPRD in all planning, Advisory or existing development, Commission: role maintenance Advisory role, and recommends management broad matters. policies
Flood Sheriff’s Department Control Office of District (MCSO): Transportation (FCD): Regularly wash (MCDOT): patrols corridor Road Park, and construction trails, dam related and boundaries. and issues.
State Agencies maintenance. Arizona especially Arizona Office Game “Watchable and of Tourism: Fish Wildlife” Department: Cooperative tourists. Variety work of on wildlife attracting issues, tourism, advice and
Federal Agencies enforcement. Arizona regularly BLM: Land State patrol exchange/purchase, Parks: and check Site Steward on archaeological R&PP Program consultation. (and sites SHPO) in Park. Volunteers
Local cities/towns City Town partnerships. of of Scottsdale: Fountain Hills: Trail connections, Trail connections, public public safety, safety, and other and other partnerships.
McDowell Group Mountain Friends A voice and advocate for the Park.
Equestrian, Bike, Special RV, Interests Mountain Work with individual groups on special interest desires when possible.
3.19 The public Note Park that safety. Public relies inconsistencies MCSO on Safety the keeps Maricopa with track the of County data all incident may Sherriff’s exist reports based Office and upon (MCSO) calls where to for the law the Park enforcement call (Table was located; 3-18). and
i.e. location on February if it was with actually 5, dispatch. 2019. outside The following the Park statistics boundary within but responding Table 3-18 units were did provided not correct by MCSO that
The support. summon Town Park assistance contracts staff and when with its needed. volunteers Rural Metro Park also visitors to provide provide are Park expected additional visitors to know public with safety and safety comply messages and with rescue and all
Park rules.
3-59

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Table McDowell On View 3-18: – Deputy Mountain MCSO Initiated Statistics Regional Activities Park Calls for Service -initiated by a member of the public
3.19.1 Park annual the natural Rule fire Fire R-113 ban and resources, during outlines Fire the Bans and acceptable warm ensure summer visitor use of months fire safety. and to The help grills. prevent bans The Department are destructive lifted as enters fires, soon protect into as the an
prevailing extreme fire wind ban. conditions permit. Limited use of grills may be permitted, unless under an
3.20 This reflect section Finances year-to-year includes Park trends budget when and available. revenue This trends. section The charts should or tables not be exhibited considered below a
3-60

complete categories ________________________________________________________________ audit-level and a general look trend into Park analysis. finances, but rather a generalized view Resource of some Analysis specific
From less $675,910.00, sufficiency than the data the level but presented Park for its FY expenditures. expenses 2018. here, the were reader For $395,448. example, may ascertain This in means FY the 2018, more the the Park recent Park’s was revenue at revenue 100% intake self- was is
3.20.1 The expenditures, staying Park Park within budget Budget and the budget consists Park donations. formulated of components Park by the staff Department’s shown is responsible below finance such for team. revenue as: Park generation revenue, Park and
3.20.2 Park and along souvenir revenue with Park concessionaire Revenue sales, comes etc. from Special agreements. many use sources permits but for primarily events from also generate visitor entrance revenue fees, for camping, the Park
Other generally year additional and funding earmarked nearly facilities sources doubled as for well may specific as from come from projects FY2012 from improved grants or to purposes. marketing FY2018 or other Revenue (Figure and partnerships, fee 3-32) is increases. generally due but to those increasing improved funds each are or
Figure 3-32: Revenue per Fiscal Year
3-61

Figure the revenue least ________________________________________________________________ 3-33 for busy below, the month year. demonstrates This of the is year due for to the the the monthly online Park, breakdown the reservation monthly of system breakdown the FY opening 2018. shows Resource While for the the August Analysis highest season is
allowing especially and better camping for weather. November reservations and March to be generate made in the advance. most revenue The cooler due months to higher of visitations the year,
Figure 3-33: Revenue by Month in FY18
Figure 3-34: Annual Camping Revenue
3-62

Facility Park and the patrons ________________________________________________________________ rentals Group prefer Ramada. are consistently to use the Park. dropping (Figure over 3-35). time Rental which areas may correlate include Ramadas with Resource the #1, how Analysis #2, the
Annual expected program. pass Figure to increase. sales 3-35: Facility show Park Rentals an visitors overall upward have expressed trend from their year-to-year satisfaction (Figure with the 3-36) annual and pass are
Daily entry Figure pass 3-36: levels Annual fluctuate Pass Revenue with overall visitation (Figure 3-37).
3-63

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
Figure 3-37: Daily Pass Entries
3.20.3 Park well facility Park covers as expenditures needs Expenditures general extra have office staffing cover increased, supplies, everything needs staff with vehicle levels volunteers. from maintenance have Park remained staff wages and the fueling and same benefits, (Table for several maintenance, 3-19). years. Although The as
Table Expense Personal General 3-19: Supplies Services type Summary (wages of and Annual benefits) Expenditures $263,578.10 $21,403.93 FY 2017 $327,187.31 $21,950.28 FY 2018
Fuel Utilities General Repairs Other and Services – electricity/water Maintenance* $62,947.96 $33,720.14 $33,490.60 $4,047.46 $9,261.65 $63,276.32 $38,310.43 $26,552.72 $5,321.76 $8,595.06
TOTAL *includes EXPENSES expense categories (all types) 8203 and 8250 $428,449.84 491,193.88
3.20.4 Donations designated use. Donations Donations to items the (Table Park such are 3-20) as accepted memorial to the pursuant Park benches, represent to ramadas, ARS §11-941, a small, brochures, but Paragraph important, critter A and care, percentage are or used general for of
income Table Amount 3-20: to the Donations Park. $1,564.00 FY 2016 $2,560.18 FY 2017
3-64

________________________________________________________________ Resource Analysis
{This page intentionally left blank.}
3-65

__________________________________________________________________________Roads
Chapter 4 – Roads and Access
4.1 4.1.1 Existing External Roads Roads, and Access, Access and Parking
McDowell roadway the approximately southeast enters Mountain 6.27 corner the miles. Park Park of Drive from the its serves Park intersection and as the meanders main with access North northward road McDowell through through Mountain the Park. the Road The Park paved near for
The currently vehicular Mountain intersection administrative the Park only Drive of vehicular McDowell extending access public points, Mountain past access the one north Park of point which Drive boundary into is the an and unpaved Park. and McDowell becomes The extension Park Mountain the has of 176th two McDowell Road Street other is
alignment, The boundary are unused other near unpaved connecting by the Hesperus general entrance with Wash public. East is Dam. known Rio These Verde as entry Drive Old Jeep points approximately Trail are and generally is one located (1) gated mile on and the to locked the southern north. and
The non-motorized of located the Park Park in maintains and is maintained maintained entry. several Currently, by by the trailhead the community the Eagles Rio entry Nest Verde of points private Rio Trailhead Verde. on community the located A west second near and near trailhead, northern the the southwest northeast Eagles borders Nest corner corner for is
of Table Road McDowell the Park. 4.1: Mountain Roadway Park Jurisdiction Road and Jurisdiction MCDOT Functional Class Functional Class 1 - Primary Class Access Road
East Notes* standards. McDowell MCDOT Mountain assigns a Road roadway function MCDOT class to every road Arterial based on roadway engineering
4.1.2 Park Guidelines/Standards Internal roads are Park designed Roads (PRSG/S) and and that Parking built are in to Lots place conform at the time to the of construction, Park Road and System also
4-1

adhere with must principle all 27-28ft __________________________________________________________________________Roads to use Park the the wide MCDOT road 12ft. roads with wide roadway 12ft. with lanes wide design no that paved lanes are manual. available and shoulders. rolling McDowell in both terrain Vehicles, directions. Mountain is set pedestrians, at Park The a maximum design Drive and is speed bicyclists designed speed for of a
35 MCDOT miles to per post hour all Park (MPH) road with speed a preferred limits and 10 speed MPH of under 25 MPH. the road It’s standard design speed. practice for
MMRP unpaved has in hard about has to roads 9.77 just reach miles over that areas. allow eight of unpaved The (8) Park miles Park visitors service of provides existing roads to circulate multiple that paved allow between roads parking Park and activity staff approximately lots to throughout provide areas. The maintenance 0.6 the Park miles Park, also of
totaling MMRP. over 2,101 parking spaces. Table 4.2 below details MCDOT’s roadway inventory for
Table Roads Paved Unpaved 4.2: public Park roads Roads and Miles 8.08 0.61 Parking Parking Designated Undesignated Lots Vehicle 223 1,878 Spaces
Unpaved service roads 9.77 n/a n/a
4.1.3 PRSG/S Primary visitors. recreational Classification defines roads Circulatory or constitute cultural three roads (3) interest, the types provide main such of access access roads: as overlooks, route, within primary circulatory campgrounds, a access, Park to tour circulation, areas or etc. thoroughfare of Area scenic, and roads area scientific, for provide roads. Park
circulation complexes, are classifications. typically concession within one-way public facilities, circulation. use areas etc. Often Table such area 4.3 as roads campgrounds, identifies are designed roads picnic within for areas, low MMRP speed visitor traffic and center their and
Table Roadway McDowell Thomas 4.3: Thumb Mountain Park Drive Roadway Park Drive Classifications Classification Primary Circulation
N. Pemberton Whitehead Rock Palisades Nob Road Way Loop Way Drive Area Area Area Area
N. Lousley Lousley Asher Shallmo View Drive Way Drive Drive Circulation Area Area Circulation
Asher Scout Camp Circle Drive Area Area
The design matrix guidelines for roadway classifications is shown in Table 4.4.
4-2

__________________________________________________________________________Roads
4.1.4 Table Capacity 4.4: Park Roadway Design Matrix
Physical are Park’s visitors 2,101 average at capacity designated any of one at 1.91 the time and people Park based undesignated is per currently on vehicle, available parking limited this parking would by spaces the alone. put number throughout peak MMRP of capacity parking is the the Park. at most spaces. about Using popular There 3,992 the
regional study As should Park is be roads needed Park considered for are to road upgraded determine in biking; order and the however, to widened, physical, provide the the Park environmental, Park addition patrons roads of with do bike and not a lanes social safe have to and capacity bike the enjoyable road lanes. of shoulders the Further riding Park.
experience. 4.1.5 The primary maintenance. BOS Maintenance recently department These updated actives responsible a resolution may utilize for dated County the federal April Park 25, Highway 2018, roadway which User design, identifies Revenue construction, MCDOT Fund (HURF) as and the
monies maintained time designed of for construction. to roads by meet MCDOT the identified newest As and Park conform for standard. public roads to use. become County All paved guidelines eligible and for named for upgrades, Park roads roadway the are constructed road systems should at and the be
Most crumbling repairs/replacement, designated paved in ADA parking many parking areas. lots as spaces. well also Any as have As parking making improvements curbing; lot sure improvements however, that are the made, curb the curbing should all cut-outs parking also is are deteriorating areas include located must curbing by meet and the
ADA Unnamed Department’s and/or requirements. maintained and trade’s unpaved by crew. the roads Park Paved maintenance are and maintained unpaved staff by parking or the trades Park’s areas crew, maintenance are but likewise the Department staff constructed or will the
1 2012-2013 ASU Park Visitor Study Final Report, Table 1.20A, page 34.
4-3

periodically within __________________________________________________________________________Roads MMRP contract that fall MCDOT under MCDOT’s for these jurisdiction. services. Table 4.5 below identifies all roadways
Table 4.5: Roadway Existing Name Park Roadway Maintenance Year Constructed Status Begin Most Date recent maintenance Type
Asher Scout Asher Lousley Camp Cir View Way Dr. Dr. (unpaved) 16-May-83 16-May-83 16-May-83 16-May-83 8/15/2012 n/a 3/27/2017 8/15/2012 Penetration n/a Penetration Penetration seal seal Seal
Thomas Palisades Rock Pemberton Nob Thumb Way Loop Loop (Pemberton Dr. Dr.) 17-Mar-86 16-Dec-83 16-Dec-83 16-Dec-88 3/17/2016 3/28/2017 8/21/2012 3/28/2017 Crack-fill Crack-fill Penetration Crack-fill Seal
Shallmo Whitehead Lousley McDowell Dr. Dr. Mountain Way Park Dr. (N) 17-Mar-86 16-Dec-88 16-May-83 Between 1970 -1976 8/21/2012 8/21/2012 8/15/2012 3/27/2017 Penetration Penetration Penetration Penetration Seal Seal seal Chip
McDowell Mountain Park Dr. (S) 28-May-85 8/21/2012 Penetration seal
4.1.6 As examined designated part Drive-time of the drive ‘minute’ 2009 times Analysis Strategic increments. (Figure System 4-1) PRO’s Master from used the Plan, the Park created 2000 entrance Census by Pros on Tract Consulting, roadways estimates LLC2 traveling for (PRO’s) 2007 at
populations, • • • Urban Exurban Rural simplified (less (2.0 (0.5 than people people 0.5 into per people to density acre 2.0 per per or categories: more; acre; acre; 0.5 0.5 2.0 to acres acres 2.0 per per acres person person per person); or or less); more). and
PRO’s against inverted available then the is ration to derived drive demonstrate of time acres proportional acreages per the person. need to population establish and This pressure effort estimates average each to correlated measure for county each Park population drive people will time per be and against under acre weighted and for acres the the
future groups demonstrates and despite how population to pressure plan to numbers on meet the that Park’s within need per in certain updated person drive per master time acre plans segments/distances ratio. and Table to serve 4.6 all below, from age
MMRP.
2 2009 Strategic System Master Plan, PROs Consulting, LLC. Page 45-47.
4-4

__________________________________________________________________________Roads
Table Regional Total Population 4.6: Park Drive Time/Acres by Time Segment Analysis (minutes) for McDowell Mountain
Year 2007* 2017 Source: 52. 2009 Strategic 15 5,673 7,305 System Master 30 62,841 81,303 Plan, PRO’s 45 651,733 913,941 Consulting, page 46, 48,
*2000 Census Tract estimates for year 2007.
Figure 4-1: Drive time analysis (Source: 2009 Strategic System Master Plan, PROs Consulting, page 60)
4.2 Current With businesses. Proposed any land level With use of the designations or development, predicted Planned adjacent level roadways Roads, of development to the Access, are Park required are located and mostly to near Parking serve preserve the southeast the and residents residential. corner and of
the jurisdiction run and parallel uncontrolled Park, the to to influence Park Department Park boundaries access or guide should and are roadway increase not remain preferred the development, aware opportunities as and they to involved tend the for to extent illegal provide with Park possible. each nearly access. appropriate Roads unlimited Parallel that
roads also serve as a barrier to wildlife and other biological movement patterns.
4-5

4.2.1 MCDOT Proposed __________________________________________________________________________Roads or Planned Roads
In outlines year improve 2017, 2035. the Maricopa MCDOT One vision of the County for updated the main planning resident’s goals the Countywide of and this lives. construction plan is Transportation to provide of transportation transportation System facilities Plan connections (TSP) through which that the
Town Currently, widen Trust Once developed, Land of and Fountain the possibly located Town this Hills on relocate is land Section operating will portions generate 2 and under 3 of of the additional McDowell Township 2010 General traffic Mountain 3 North, which Plan Road Range which will once funnel 6 outlines East, the to is former the a developed. proposed need State to
minor McDowell arterial Mountain road Road extending near the north northeast from Fountain corner of Hills Section Boulevard 2. and connecting with
4.2.2 The the the northeast mid-1980s, 1967 Future MDP corner Access identified the only of Points the access north Park. and point In 1985, south into roadways boundary the Park within was access via MMPR routes. the unpaved were From being the 176th early designed street 1970s near and to
constructed new to connecting the roadway Park to by shifted design McDowell MCDOT to and in the Mountain the order southeast increasingly to Road. create corner By growing a more 1989, of the community accessible the Park Town with regional of to Fountain the the south, main park. Hills the Park As main had part entrance grown of entry the
large extending utilized between enough as 1999 from the to and E. main incorporate Rio 2013 Park Verde indicated entrance. and Drive became the and Data majority 176th the collected gateway Street of local into from town Park the the to Park patrons the ASU was Park. Park live gated The in Visitor the and unpaved residential no Surveys longer road
neighborhoods department north points entrance proposed brought should north are identified forward of be the developed Park. the in Figure north As as part future 4-2 entrance of below. this growth planning from and the process, need MDP dictates. into both the the Additional current public MP. and access This the
4-6

__________________________________________________________________________Roads
Figure Outside has a new a specific 4-2: access of Existing the decision point, approved and whether Planned making roadways Future it protocol be a and Access trailhead to access Points follow points or when a roadway. identified deciding Similarly, in when the MP, and adjacent the where Department residents to install
sometimes Department’s locations access point may request and access be may suitable access require matrix for within protocol its the own Park. neighborhoods. and to The determine separate protocol public In which involves all involvement. cases, of these looking the preferred Park at all will aspects entry follow of point the the
The the recommends the Town former 2010 have General State that both portions Trust Plan3 identified Land for of the these south the Town need lands of discusses and the remain desire the the southeast as to open existing have space. an corner development established Additionally, of the public Park. agreements MCPRD The trailhead plan and for
located 4.2.3 Future on the shared Internal boundary Park Roads of the Park. and Parking Lots
The roads accommodate PRSG/S are should designed the design be followed and vehicle developed. when - a motorhome Park All roads roadway with require a boat classifications extensive trailer. maintenance are adequate or as new to
3 Plan, Town as of accessed Fountain December Hills, 2010 12, General 2018. Plan, January 7m,2010. https://www.fh.az.gov/224/Fountain-Hills-General-
4-7

Improvements Road Park entrance aligning __________________________________________________________________________Roads are with are underway, recommended 176th Street this north road to unpaved should of the be boundary. portion fully paved. of Once North plans McDowell to develop Mountain the north Park
As incorporated to Park accommodate new visitors, amenities into trailhead future are its site added parking parking design. to the needs. Some must Park, As existing also adequate trail be use parking evaluated. continues parking lots and Some can to biking increase be trailheads expanded lanes in popularity should may or realigned require also with be
additional parking.
4-8

__________________________________________________________________________Roads
{This page intentionally left blank.}
4-9

__________________________________________________________________________ Trails
Chapter The trails system trails based is chapter a 5 vital on – current Trails component details requests the existing of the and Park needs trails and within identified provides the Park, in visitors the as MP well with update as diverse proposes process. recreational additional The trail
experiences Trails bird-watching, serve from multiple and educational equestrian purposes interpretive use. including They can trails exercising, also to rugged provide walking, mountain safe alternative jogging, hikes. hiking, transportation bicycling,
routes Connecting stewardship as well people of the as trail and create systems, places connectivity enhances parks, and from the the Sonoran user one experience facility Desert or as and municipality a whole. promotes (Figure to long 5-1). another. term
The (Trail 1999, The Trail McDowell System amended System Plan) Regional in Plan 2008, (Appendix and Park and amendments Trail updated J) was System adopted in describe 2011. Plan in
the including and condition. desired prescribes trail future access actions condition points, to achieve service of the trail the road planned system, access,
The recommendations received periods. MP The during update feedback the based provides received open on public conceptual will public help comment feedback to guide trail
trail development periodically deletions alignment to the updated manager. trail planning system in Trail this may chapter alignments for require the of an the will trail Amendment MP be as Figure an amendment. 5-1: to the Trails Trail Crew System hard Additional at work. Plan trails listed or in
Appendix recommendations Manager, and J. are The also and Park responsible guidance Planner to for the and implementing Park Trail Supervisor Manager the changes and are Planning that tasked may be and with required. Engineering providing
5-1

The guidelines Maricopa Trails __________________________________________________________________________ County Management for planning, parks. design, Manual construction, (TMM) provides and further maintenance detail on of the policies, trails standards, and system Trails and in
5.1 MMRP 15.3 diamond-rated Existing miles offers (Figure approximately trails Trails 5-2). (Table Trails 5-1). 68 miles are In addition, of rated multi-use from there easy trails, are 0.6 to ranging strenuous miles of in barrier-free length and include from trails. 0.6 two mile (2) to
Figure 5-2 Identified Trails from the 1999 Trails Plan and the 2011 Trails Plan Update
5-2

__________________________________________________________________________ Trails
Figure 5-3: Future Trails identified as part of the Park Master Planning Process
Table Name 5-1: Designated Miles1 Trails Kilometers1 Notes Rating2 Classification Management
Bluff Boulder 2.2 1.1 3.5 1.8 Shared Shared use use Primary Primary
Chuparosa Cinch 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 Hike/Bike Only Shared use Secondary Primary
Coachwhip Delsie 2.6 2.5 4.2 4.0 Shared Shared use use Primary Primary
Dixie Eagle Mine 5.6 0.4 9.0 0.6 Shared Hike Only) (Youth use Secondary Primary
Escondido Granite 6.2 3.5 10.0 5.6 Shared Shared use use Primary Primary
Hilltop 0.5 0.7 Hike Secondary
5-3

Lariat Lousley __________________________________________________________________________ Hill 1.5 1.2 2.4 2.0 Shared Hike use Secondary Primary Trails
North Nursery Pemberton Tank 15.3 2.9 0.6 24.6 4.7 0.9 Hike Hike Shared use Barrier Primary Primary Free
Rock Scenic Knob 1.1 3.5 1.7 5.6 Shared Shared Hike/Bike use use Primary Primary
Scout Shallmo Camp Wash 0.8 1.7 1.3 2.8 (Youth only) Shared Groups use Primary Primary
Sonoran Stoneman Wash 2.6 4.3 4.2 6.9 Shared Shared use use Primary Primary
Tonto Tortoise Tank 2.7 0.7 4.3 1.1 Shared Hike/Bike Only use Primary Primary
Verde Wagner 1.2 1.1 2.0 1.8 Hike/Bike Only Hike/Bike Only Primary Primary
Windmill Competitive Sport Loop Tracks 1.1 3.0 1.8 4.8 Shared Distances from trailhead use are round-trip Competitive Primary Track
Technical Long Loop Loop 2.7 7.9 12.8 4.4 Distances from Distances from trailhead trailhead are are round-trip round-trip Competitive Competitive Track Track
Spurs 1 2 https://www.maricopacountyparks.net/assets/1/6/2018_Trails_Management_Training_Manual_ Distances Rating symbols may have are defined 3.3 been rounded in Table 5.3 4-3 below or Varies online at Multiple locations
Update.pdf
5.1.1 The its speed trails. Park Competitive outdoor The offers Competitive recreation approximately Track Tracks for individuals, 14-miles are designed of groups, Competitive to provide and organized Tracks challenging, (Figure events. strenuous, 5-4), The in Competitive addition and high- to
Tracks runners endurance are and riders. designed joggers; The for fast tracks single bicyclists may direction, be closed and racers; multiple-use to general and use trotting/galloping activities when organized such as: and/or equestrians cross-country large scale and
5-4

events Homeless, __________________________________________________________________________ are etc.). taking (Table place 5-2). (i.e., Ragnar Trail Relay, Javelina Jundred, XTerra, Hike for Trails the
Table Fiscal 2015-2016 Year 5-2: Competitive Number Track of 38 Events Events and Participants Attendance 9795
2016-2017 2017-2018 Attendance include numbers is for for events events with open 37 36 pre to registration the public. requirements 9312 9103 and does not
Figure 5-4: McDowell Competitive Track
5-5

5.1.2 __________________________________________________________________________ Maricopa Trail Trails
The Windmill/Coachwhip near circumnavigate Maricopa the northwest Trail the interior has boundary Trail two near of (2) the of connections the Park the southwest via Park. the (or Pemberton Once boundary, trail spurs) on the and Trail. into trail the The the second spurs, Park Maricopa with a which trail Trail Delsie align user is Trail with part can
of connections regional hikers, a regional mountain non-motorized to trail metropolitan bikers, plan multi-modal and that equestrians areas, links municipal all corridors. of who Maricopa are trails, It seeking also communities, County provides long regional distance an and outlet parks neighborhoods routes. for and competitive provides with
5.2 Scottsdale’s points System Proposed to Plan the General should Preserve Community take Plan which these 20351, borders desired outlines Trails/Trailheads the locations Park its desired to into the west. consideration future Any trails, future trailheads, and updates utilize to and the the access access Trail
matrix point. to determine the precise location, suitability, and public benefit of adding an access
The corridors outside of MMRP, Town’s of and the the General wash Town encourage corridors. recommends Plan 20102, the In use regards outlines preserving of major to the the and some Town’s former contiguous of desire the ASLD land located to open for protect open space adjacent the space with natural to while and pathways south wash also
recommending link Fountain Hills that with the MMRP. Town continue to encourage the development of trail systems that
As Town development the former to request plans ASLD for a lands these formal become two public sections available trailhead of land. for development, be incorporated MCPRD into will the work community with the
5.3 All practice riders prohibited. trails Trail to proper are remain Trail Use shared-use, trail education on etiquette. designated unless and Park law otherwise trails, enforcement Rule and R-118 designated. shortcutting requires will be All used hikers, by trail to any users attain equestrians, type are compliance, of encouraged trail and user bicycle when to is
necessary. undesignated Signs washes will be if use posted is continued and barriers after closure. constructed at obliterated paths, roads, and
1 21, 2 http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/Assets/ScottsdaleAZ/General+Plan/_SGP2035_TFLegEdit.pdf City Town 2018. of of Scottsdale Fountain General Hills General Plan 2035 Plan 2010 (November 2014), as accessed November
5-6

__________________________________________________________________________ Trails
The 11.36 (Table 2012-2013 miles3. 5-3): When ASU Park singled Visitor out Study by the shows visitors’ that primary Park visitors activity, use other trails trail for an uses average include of
Table Primary Trail hiking 5-3: Activity Trail Uses Percent 22.6 of Visitors1 Miles 5.59 of Trail Used2
Mountain Picnicking Running/jogging biking 56.7 0.5 1.9 19.31 N/A 13.75
Horseback Walking for riding pleasure 7.2 00 6.77 N/A
1. 2. 2012-2013 2012-2013 ASU ASU Park Park Visitor Visitor Study Study Final Final Report, Report, Table Table 1.9A, 1.10, page page 26. 23.
5.4 In trail hotter 2012, users Trail months a in partnership Rating assessing when the what of temperatures metro-area trails are park best and/or agencies suited humidity for developed their are abilities high, a trail (Table trails rating are 5-4). guide rated During to at assist least the
one level higher.
Table Rating Symbol 5-4: Trail Brief Rating Definition Guide Surface Grade Obstacles/Steps
Easiest Paved Accessible Trail Paved smooth or hard and None
Easy Mostly wide smooth and Dirt unevenness with occasional 2" and or ruts less, rocks
Moderate Mostly variable smooth, width Dirt unevenness with occasional <8" ruts, material rocks loose and
Moderate Mostly uneven surfaces Dirt and rock <12" ruts, material loose rocks and
Difficult difficult Long with and exposure possible rocky segments drops Dirt with unevenness and continual loose rock 12" rocks, drops or exposure taller, loose to
Extremely difficult Long with and exposure possible rocky segments drops Dirt with unevenness and continual loose rock 12" rocks, drops excessive or and exposure taller, heat loose to
>90F
3 2012-2013 ASU Park Visitor Study Final Report, Table 1.10, page 26.
5-7

__________________________________________________________________________ Trails
{This page intentionally left blank.}
5-8

_______________________________________________________________ Management Zoning
Chapter The Master 6-1). foundation It should Plan 6 (SSMP), – also for Management be the dated noted Park June that management 2009 the Zoning SSMP (page also zones 105-116), recommends is found and is in that presented the the 2009 size again Strategic of all here developed System (Table
areas adjacent 2009, expected should the to to Park other increase be limited had protected slightly approximately to 10% open as new of space the projects 1.4% areas overall of or may its trails park exceed total size; are acres constructed. the however, 10% developed; recommendation. smaller that parks number that As are of is
Table Zone Development 6-1: Management Zone Percent 1.4% and (292.46 Acreage of Total acres) Park Acres
Trail Semi-Primitive Primitive Perimeter Buffer 2.2% 49.4% 41.2% 5.3% (1,110.73 (472.20 (10,413.71 (8,700.22 acres) acres) acres) acres)
Non-Management Source: 2009 Strategic Zone System 0.5% Master (104.69acres) Plan, page 118.
6.1 The from location current Methodology the of SSMP developed management (pages 105-116). features. for zoning Determining descriptions The The zones management were and Management maps determined zones used are for based meant MMRP Zones on are to existing provide taken use directly some and
flexibility. development management which may If/when or zone(s) zone(s) may not development may be impacted its be preferred necessary. occurs will need future on The the to use; Park north, be as reviewed, was such, south, zoned future or and west according revisions modifications side of to of the existing these Park, to zones use the the
should management. and of management remoteness, include For and descriptions challenging example, a high level one their of of zone the outdoor resource desired may skills. provide protection visitor This the zone experience visitor and would may with be thus and a labeled sense require level as of of “primitive” wilderness a low intended level
and conditions. should reflect the desired future conditions of the Park rather than existing use or
6-1

_______________________________________________________________ Management Zoning
6.2 The management the classification Description following only chart of and each of (Table are is Management allowed. designed 6-2) describes to be a working Zones the zones document that are so that areas some of flexibility land-based of
Table Zone (Management 6-2: Park Management Description Zones Includes, but not limited to:
Level) Development (Highest) Includes of largest management. level areas of which park These activity require areas by contain the visitors. highest the level roads, archery/shooting airplane, complex, golf sports restroom courses, fields, range, facilities, aquatic model picnic
When 10% are may contiguous exceed of possible, overall 10%. park to this other zone size. protected Smaller should not parks open exceed that space areas equestrian stations, parking and lots, visitor ramadas, facilities, boat centers, launch camp entrance trailheads areas, sites,
Trail (High) This second areas zone are only limited requires to development to a passive level of recreation management zones. These and amphitheaters, areas, park barrier-free regional access park system offices gates, trails, group trails, shared-use hiker-only areas, competitive staging trails, trails,
park vehicular maintenance access is only. restricted. In most cases, public tracks, (with management no service connectivity zones), roads, unpaved public to developed roads, roads
Hiking land uses trails makes and up their the connectivity majority of this to adjacent zone.
Perimeter (Fairly high) buffer This boundary Park area security includes and and adjacent limiting areas to along varying external the land park uses. fencing and access gates
connectivity Due parks, to the encroaching management are the development goals required of this zone. for at several this zone
Semi-primitive (Low) can This between contain be zone fairly few other includes amenities. high. management areas These adjacent zones areas to which should and act back country areas
as management. a transition between zones of high and low
Typically and management low. provide contain a required “back minimal country for this impact experience”. zone activities is very The
Primitive (Lowest) Encompasses remote which pedestrian the and terrain traffic inaccessible. the areas as is too well which rugged as Included, areas are for that considered vehicular are are areas a or wildlife areas
6-2

_______________________________________________________________ great zone without distance a from point any of access. other “developed” Management Zoning
The conservation zone wildlife amount key is available study) of element management. and and only of preservation. therefore this by zone special should requires Access permit be the wildlife to (i.e. this least
6.3 Topography semi-primitive therefore Area semi-primitive Descriptions or and natural primitive. and or cultural primitive Many that resources areas Influence are inherently are may too rugged determine Park appropriate for Zoning any the areas type in a of large that development are portion considered of and the
park. The within will require SSMP the Park (page an update. (Figure 112) notes 6-1). As that future current connectivity management and access zones needs reflect change, existing these land zones uses
Figure 6-1: Development Zones (Source: MCPRD 2009 Strategic System Master Plan, Figure 43, p 112)
6-3

_______________________________________________________________ Management Zoning
{This page intentionally left blank.}
6-4

__________________________________________________________ Park Improvement Projects
Chapter This the public planning chapter input, 7 identifies process. and – Park consultation new This Improvement Park process with improvement neighboring includes Projects projects the agencies, analysis that have of Commission existing been determined conditions, and Department through trends,
staff asked comment expertise to review on department as the described project proposed maps, in previous submit Park improvements. chapters. their requests Staff, for stakeholders, future Park and improvements, the public were and
The old outlined plan MP update by had the been current incorporates revised plan update to some reflect of include: the current original Park 1967 use MP and concepts; needs. however, Objectives most that of the are
Supporting This promotes update educational existing recommends features components supporting and amenities: of the the Park, addition such as: of amenities to existing areas, and
• • Upgrades expansion Expansion and additional and of of the active repairs amenities event recreation staging to in existing high areas, areas use facilities and such areas restrooms); as (e.g. of a bike the trails, Park, skills campground i.e. park, campground new multi-use infrastructure, and trails, event
• • staging Improved Inclusion Development. areas; of signage the Southwest and maps; Wildlife and Conservation Center into the new Nature Center
Limiting The cultural currently the Park. update resources. other in place streamlines features: or Other recommended the developed quantity within features of built this outlined update facilities are in to the no protect original longer the applicable 1967 Parks MP natural facilities that are and not for
7.1 The constraints Constraints, Issues planning on and and team the Analysis Constraint park. met The early Section MP in Analysis (Table update the planning 7-1): addresses process those to items discuss discussed issues within that may its Issues, place
7-1

__________________________________________________________ Park Improvement Projects
Table Issue/Constraint Management 7-1: Issues Zones Constraints and Analysis Analysis Management Additional development Zones represent actions must existing complement land use. its
zone reflect zone. change. or the Some modify desired proposed the use zone. and projects The visitor Management may expectation require Zone for a should zone that
Access Adjacent Park Protection established are private creating and of new the land private entry Park owners access points boundaries north considered points and needs into south as the growth to of Park. the be
Wildlife corridors/linkages occurs Future accommodate the Tonto in development adjacent National linkages areas. Forest will between be to sited the the in Preserve north, locations and to the that the west, Fort will
Hunting McDowell Designated areas there are cannot; two Yavapai areas designated as regulated of Nation the lands park hunting through can to the areas fill AZGFD. east. this within niche Currently, the other Park
Compliment established themes however, the All of Adventure efforts additional these have and Park areas been outdoor amenities made may recreation. need to are compliment to developed. undergo Park’s review theme once
Neighboring development city/town patterns The participate development Park Supervisor patterns. with neighboring and/or Park agencies Planner regarding routinely
Maintain 10% of land development acres to under Currently, Park actions repurpose is will well 1.4% previously need within of to land the take disturbed 10% acres this limit. guideline are considered ground Future into to development account developed; the extent and
Operations feasible. The revenue improvements Park increases has had are over a needed steady the past visitor to continue several increase years. to as provide well Facility as a
positive diversify renovation include user an what and experience, analysis amenities development of increase the operating Park planning Park offers. impacts revenue, should Facilities also and and
opportunities for efficiency.
7.2 Park Departments mandates Recommended Improvements outlined vision and in and Park the mission. enhancements 2009 Improvements These SSMP enhancements and recommended promote also the in address Park’s the MP theme. the adhere Park’s The priority to Park the
7-2

improvements advisory planning __________________________________________________________ documents group and suggestions, features (Figures detailed 7-1 park through in staff this 7-2, recommendations, section and Table were based 7-2). on and public guidance Park input, Improvement stakeholder from Projects other
A completed through sources timeline will the as for Department’s be funding identified completion and through Capital opportunities was not Improvement the assigned Implementation become Plan to available. any (CIP) Plan one and (IP). project Projects potential However, as will costs projects a be priority and scheduled may funding level be
was • assigned High protection. Priority: to show projects which project(s) that are in may progress; be of greater public need: health or safety issues; resource
• Medium desired level Priority: of service important, across but a range not a of matter recreation of public opportunities. health or safety; to indicate a
• Low considerations. Priority: desired features; or dependent on long-term partnerships or other
A budgetary Park cultural majority operations resource resources, of these and inventories projects build resources. partnerships will and be Site clearances), phased specific with in individually other and plans engineering agencies, (including over and multiple plans any to applicable minimize may years be required to impacts natural maximize for or to
new be staffing funded. construction. resources Improvement to The implement. IP and projects an annual are Business contingent Plan upon will help having identify adequate which funding projects and will
For conceptual resource the purposes management only; the of this issues. precise MP Additional update, location the may public mapped change meetings location due regarding to of engineering any individual new facilities feasibility projects herein may and is
be subsequent required future and the projects. results of which may shape the final outcome of the project and
Additionally, considered be standards precise. outlined conceptual New any new trails in the trail only. or 2018 or roads The Trails road locations will alignments Management be are located general shown Manual according corridors as (TMM), Park to and improvements the MCDOT are Department’s not standards intended are trail also and to
guidelines, travel Department. hazardous, until and and they Traveling is appropriate in have violation on been undesignated project of Park properly design Rules. constructed, routes and engineering. causes posted, damage Alignments and to designated the are land, not may open by the be to
As recommends a result of the public following input, Park agency improvement partner projects: input, and staff expertise, the MP update
7-3

__________________________________________________________ Park Improvement Projects
Figure 7-1: Recommended Park Improvements (north area up)
Figure 7-2: Recommended Park Improvements (Campground and Nature Center)
7-4

__________________________________________________________ Park Improvement Projects
Figure 7-3: Recommended Park Improvements (Competitive Track and Four Peaks Staging Area)
7-5

__________________________________________________________ Park Improvement Projects
Existing Table 7-2: park Existing features - - Nature Maintenance Features including: Center and Compound Recommended Improvements - - Ramadas Restrooms and picnic tables
- - - - Tent Playground Host RV camping sites Sites sites - - - Event Trails Competitive Staging / Trailheads Track areas
Recommended ID# Location Improvements Description Priority Level
Renovation 1 Four Peaks of Existing Facilities This needs area for event may be staging. expanded upon in order to meet the Parks High
2 Competitive Track An area the addition Park. is needed of approximately in order to continue 4.5 acres to serve of unpaved events parking held in High
3 4 Campground Campground Additional loop Electrical can accommodate upgrades RV camp associated sites up to are 15 needed. additional with the The Service RV existing sites. Entrance south Medium High
5 Maintenance Campground Section Telecommunications (SES) cabinets infrastructure and RV site pedestals. needed. Medium
6 Nursery Tank Trail create tank, safety improvements a full rail barrier and free interpretive include; loop, rehabilitate an panel extension improvements. the of wildlife the trail water to Medium
7 8 Asher North View park Renovate for Restrooms the camping Restroom - Update cabins. (RR) fixtures Add #2 a in to host RR incorporate #1, site 2, to and this shower 3 area. (north). facilities Medium High
Park-wide Park-wide Update Roadway road and trail 176th widening signage. Street and alignment. maintenance. Pave north entrance Park- wide Low
9 North Trail North use well by as Trail hikers. updated is designated Improvements interpretive as signs. an include interpretive additional trail signage for single as Medium
Develop 10 Shallmo McDowell Nature New Facilities Center and -New Location center Park admin with of proposed interpretive offices. new Additional displays, nature classrooms, facilities and wildlife associated gift conservation shop, with and High
wildlife may Southwest be conservation dependent Wildlife Conservation to on be a phased successful or in. a similar New partnership center organization. location with
7-6

__________________________________________________________ Park Improvement Projects
11 Campground loop Constructed Loop additional (2) ADA Drive RV RV and sites an sites. additional N. and Palisades The two new (2) loop Way host loop to to sites. connect will accommodate include with at Pemberton least up to two 25 Medium
12 Campground loop Amphitheater an Existing nature amphitheater center playground location. – refurbish for equipment interpretive the existing to programs be playground reused for at campers. the area new as Low
13 14 Wagner Existing Center pending Trail Nature Connection Refurbish parking, picnic existing from tables Wagner nature and to shade center the new (natural area nature as or a structures). center. trailhead with Low Low
15 16 SWCC Trail Shallmo McDowell and New new Larger nature trailhead connection nature center. located based This trail playground will from at the also RV current include campground to be Nature a located sound Center to the near garden proposed location. the with new High Low
nature A staging existing new themed area unpaved unpaved located instruments. public service west parking road of Chuparosa to area allow and Trail. safe concessionaire access Improve to the the
17 Concessionaire and area Staging approximate A the to County provide development, approved recreation 3.5 acre operation concession area. opportunities and operation maintenance not otherwise that of will facility(s) provided include Medium
18 Nursery Tank by guided Development parking the tours. Department, south of of McDowell a new i.e. restroom equestrian Mountain facility operations Park Road. and associated providing The trail Low
will connect Nursery ADA be accessible extended with Tank. the picnic A to larger parking create table shade a area should full structure and barrier-free also restroom be outfitted included. loop northwest which with will an of
19 20 Lousley Asher View Loop Add tent Two Additional sites. a areas restroom/shower cabins listed may as be potential house, built as additional site demand locations increases. tent and for pop-up cabins. Medium Medium
21 22 North Trailhead Verde Trail Upgrade Verde with Pemberton Trail picnic extension tables, in order add to extend individual to keep west North shade and connect structures. Trail compliant directly High Low
23 North Entry with Park include of the County Access Park). a paved Park - Develop road Trail connection Standards. a north to entry Rio station Verde Road which (north will Low
24a Competitive Track Addition Final topography. location of a flow may trail (a). change See maps depending on the previous of landscape page. Low
7-7

__________________________________________________________ Park Improvement Projects
24b Competitive Track Three previous (3) page. new competitive track loops (b). See maps on the Medium
24c Competitive Track Up to 20 acre bike park(c). See maps on the previous page. High
25 26 Trail Trail Trail Trail. New located spur trail on from spur Asher recommended from View North Drive. Trail north to entry the existing station trailhead to North Medium High
27 Group Camp This serves parking, area the additional may park’s be RV converted RV camping loop, etc. in needs, the future i.e. additional in a way overflow that best Low
Resource North boundaries and Protection South park Boundary include signage. pipe protection rail fencing, where wire possible or range and fencing, necessary; gates, may and High
Education/Interpretation 28 Nature Trail Center New between Create one new/additional proposed (1) mile and barrier interpretive existing free nature displays interpretive center to location. highlight loop trail the Medium Medium
Park-wide historical Encourage resources, and historic backdrop habitat educational resources or of the other into area. components natural Park programs, systems, related and interpretive to cultural water Park- wide
Park-wide signage, Update all or interpretive other displays. panels. Park- wide
7-8

__________________________________________________________ Park Improvement Projects
{This page intentionally left blank.}
7-9