201808XX GLENDALE LRT MAJOR AMENDMENT TPC.DOCX
Extracted text (via pymupdf_layout)
5186 characters
Transportation Policy Committee INFORMATION SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # X DATE August 8, 2018 SUBJECT Major Amendment to the Regional Transportation Plan: Deletion of Central Glendale Light Rail Extension CONTACT Audra Koester Thomas, Transportation Planning Program Manager, (602) 254-6300 SUMMARY The Regional Transportation Plan was adopted by MAG Regional Council on November 25, 2003, and provides a broad vision for the future regional transportation system. It was the result of a major planning effort initiated in 2001 and completed in late 2003. The Regional Transportation Plan also provides the blueprint for the implementation of Proposition 400, the half-cent sales tax used to fund transportation. Funding from Proposition 400 must be used on projects and programs identified in the Regional Transportation Plan and is allocated by mode. The extension of light rail to Glendale is a high capacity transit project originally included in the 2003-adopted Regional Transportation Plan. This light rail extension was envisioned to extend west from 19th Avenue to downtown Glendale; its study by Valley Metro has been referred to as “West Phoenix/Central Glendale” project. On December 12, 2017, the Glendale City Council voted to discontinue participation in the West Phoenix/Central Glendale study and requested that the Regional Transportation Plan 1 reflect the decision; a major amendment to the Regional Transportation Plan is required to satisfy such a request. If proceeding with this major amendment is recommended by Transportation Policy Committee and Regional Council, the following would ensue: August – September, 2018: Consultation with Regional Public Transportation Authority (Valley Metro RPTA), Arizona State Transportation Board, and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, as well as Indian communities, cities and towns in the county; action to approve, modify or disapprove amendment by Valley Metro RPTA, Arizona State Transportation Board, and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. September – October, 2018: Approval of the major amendment through MAG committee process, pending air quality conformity analysis. December 2018 – January 2019: Approval of amended Regional Transportation Plan subsequent to new finding of air quality conformity. The project is funded through federal, regional and local sources. Valley Metro’s Fiscal Year 2019 Transit Life Cycle Program has moved Glendale’s portion of Proposition 400 funding previously allocated to this project, approximately $51 million, to the program’s fund balance. 2 ACTION NEEDED Recommend approval to consult with the Valley Metro RPTA, Arizona State Transportation Board, and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, as well as Indian communities, cities and towns in the county, as required by A.R.S. 28-6353, on the proposal to delete the Glendale Light Rail Extension from the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan, contingent on the finding of air quality conformity. PROS & CONS PROS: Based on Glendale City Council’s decision to discontinue participation in and remove funding support for a light rail extension to downtown Glendale, approval of this major amendment would ensure the Regional Transportation Plan is consistent with the latest planning activities and the requirement it be fiscally constrained. CONS: Deletion of the Glendale Light Rail Extension eliminates the opportunity to further improve regional mobility. An extension of light rail to downtown Glendale was 3 supported by Glendale voters as part of Proposition 402 in 2001 and by Maricopa County voters as part of Proposition 400 in 2004. TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS TECHNICAL: Previous study has indicated propensity for high capacity transit, such as light rail, to Glendale. While the deletion of the Glendale Light Rail Extension from the Regional Transportation Plan removes any planned high capacity transit north and west of 43rd Avenue, it does not preclude action to add future planned high capacity transit to the Plan pending technical evaluation and identification of funding. POLICY: Addition or deletion of a fixed guideway transit system that exceeds one mile in length is considered a “major amendment” per state statute (A.R.S. 28-6301). A major amendment process (A.R.S. 28-6353) begins with consideration by the Transportation Policy Committee. If it concurs, the Transportation Policy Committee submits the proposed amendment for consultation by Valley Metro RPTA, Arizona State Transportation Board, and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, as well as Indian communities, cities and towns in the county. Within 30 days of receiving the proposed amendment, the Valley Metro RPTA, Arizona State Transportation Board, and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors by a majority vote of the members of each board submit a written recommendation to the Transportation Policy Committee that the amendment be approved, modified or disapproved. If the major amendment fails to receive approval by any of these agencies, the affirmative vote of seventeen members of the Transportation Policy Committee is required to proceed with approving the amendment. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS None. PUBLIC INPUT None. 4