CSA MARICOPA OUTREACH PRESENTATION 2018 FINAL.PDF

Maricopa County — Informal (2018-09-17)

View PDF Item 2 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf_layout) 7671 characters
C O U N T Y S U P E R V I S O R S A S S O C I A T I O N
BOARD BRIEFING
MARICOPA COUNTY
5 3 R D L E G I S L A T U R E , S E C O N D R E G U L A R S E S S I O N
0 9 · 1 7 · 1 8

U.S.
Executive,
Congressional
& Federal
Agencies
The
Executive & State
County State Legislature
Agencies County
Intergovernmental Supervisors,
Administrators
Engagement & Professional
Staff
Other
County
The Courts
Elected
Officials

Strengthening Counties’
Intergovernmental Presence
Appointments on Behalf of Counties FY17-18
• Governor’s Water Augmentation • PSPRS Advisory Committee
Council • Arizona Management System
• Governor's Water Solutions Process stakeholder groups
• Groundwater workgroup • Arizona Department of Transportation
• Colorado River workgroup • Arizona Department of Revenue
• Detention Regionalization Taskforce, • Arizona Department of Water Resources
Arizona Judicial Council • Arizona Criminal Justice Commission
• Statewide Juvenile Justice, Legislative • AOC Commission on Technology
Ad-hoc Committee • Constables Ethics, Standards and
Training Board

Using Data to Increase Capacity
COLLECTION DISTRIBUTION
CSA and county staff Master Database and County
interface to collect data 1 2 Encyclopedia are tools for
CSA staff collects data from county and CSA staff to easily
third part sources access 15 county data from
anywhere
ADVOCACY
ANALYSIS
CSA legislative team uses
individual and all-county 4 3 CSA staff uses revenue,
data to build narratives that expenditure, demographic
demonstrate the importance and other county data to
of county priorities quantify the impacts of
legislation

25 55
73
Interactive County Advocacy
Datasets Encyclopedia
Documents Documents

Bills
Introduced 1,206
Passed 369
Legislative Report County Relevant 220
Signed 346
2018 SESSION BY NUMBERS
Ballot Propositions 2
Vetoed 23
Signed Rate 29%

County Priorities
• Eliminate recession-era cost shifts
including:
• ADJC
• SVPs at ASH
• Superior Court Judges’ Salaries
• DUC Pool Payments
• In-lieu Lottery
• EORP circuit breaker for rural counties
• Extend county “flexibility language” as a
tool to meet county fiscal obligations

State Budget: Maricopa County Results
General Fund
• ADJC - $6.7M in one-time relief
• SVPs at ASH - $2.2M in ongoing savings
• EORP Rate Floated (SB 1478)- $10.4M in ongoing liability
• Phased in Superior Court Judges’ Salaries - $6.6M in savings in FY20 and $13.1M in
ongoing savings in FY21
HURF
• FY19 - $2.5M in additional transportation funding
• FY20 - $3.7M in additional transportation funding

FY19 In-Lieu
FY19 Above FY19 EORP FY19 Net
County Lottery
Baseline Relief Impact Impact
(now ongoing)
Apache $0 $355,200 ($355,200) $0 Results by County
Cochise $0 $622,500 ($622,500) $0
Coconino $0 $461,800 ($654,600) ($192,800) Additional Budget Tools
Gila $0 $270,700 ($270,700) $0 FY19
Graham $0 $325,000 ($325,000) $0 • Flexibility Language
Greenlee $0 $324,500 ($324,500) $0 • Omni-language up to $1.25M
for counties with a population
La Paz $0 $304,500 ($304,500) $0 less than 250K
Maricopa $0 $8,891,500 ($10,389,800) ($1,498,300) • ADOR, ADJC & RTC payments
Mohave $550,050 $706,500 ($895,300) $361,250 FY20
Navajo $0 $561,800 ($561,800) $0 • HB 2166: Additional VLT GF
Pima $0 $3,342,000 ($2,414,000) $928,000 revenue
Pinal $550,050 $995,900 ($1,025,000) $520,950 • Superior Court Judges’ phase-in:
Santa Cruz $0 $404,100 ($404,100) $0 $6.6M
Yavapai $550,050 $737,000 ($847,600) $439,450 FY21
Yuma $0 $528,700 ($757,000) ($228,300) • Superior Court Judges’ phase-in:
Total $1,650,150 $18,831,700 ($20,151,600) $13.1M
Figures are rounded

Results by County
County FY19 FY20
Apache $164,122 $245,131
Cochise $199,570 $298,077
HURF Restoration Coconino $236,898 $353,829
IMPACT OF NEW HIGHWAY SAFETY FEE Gila $89,788 $134,107
Graham $58,258 $87,014
Greenlee $22,048 $32,930
La Paz $96,012 $143,403
Results by HURF Recipient Maricopa $2,500,196 $3,734,275
Recipient FY19 FY20 Mohave $294,302 $439,568
Counties $5,969,800 $8,916,453 Navajo $196,357 $293,278
Cities $9,583,250 $14,313,404
Pima $1,027,356 $1,534,452
MAG ($3,020,625) $2,701,758
Pinal $469,822 $701,722
PAG ($1,006,875) $900,586
ADOT $-- $42,566,499 Santa Cruz $84,551 $126,284
Yavapai $279,825 $417,944
Yuma $250,696 $374,438
Total $5,969,800 $8,916,453

State Budget: Structural Balance
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21
Ongoing Revenues $ 9,749 $10,305 $10,742 $11,221
Ongoing Expenditures $ 9,639 $10,155 $10,697 $11,218
Structural Balance (Deficit) $ 110 $ 151 $ 45 $ 3
Carry Forward $ 341 $ 355 $ 281 $ 191
Fund Transfers $ 46 $ 116 $ 2 --
One-time Expenditures $ 183 $ 235 $ 95 $ 88
Ending Balance (Deficit) $ 204 $ 236 $ 188 $ 103

P U R P O S E
Protect and enhance the county
County Legislative
resources and authorities
Engagement necessary to promote efficient,
responsive county government
services to constituents.
General effective date for bills: CSA Legislative Summary
August 3, 2018 Available at
90 days after Sine Die www.countysupervisors.org

CSA Initiated Legislation
HB 2190 county improvement districts; repayment agreements Ch. 80
HB 2413 public road maintenance; primitive designation Ch. 16
SIGNED HB 2653 expenditure limitation; waiver of penalties Ch. 325
SB 1038 state land payments; payment method Ch. 18
SB 1113 zoning violations; notice; service Ch. 213
BUDGET HB 2274 county contributions; hospitalization; medical; repeal
MESSAGING HB 2415 juvenile dependency proceedings fund
HB 2439 county contributions; committed youth; repeal
DID NOT
ADVANCE SB 1410 transient lodging tax; rural counties

Reactive Advocacy
Approximately 440 bills with a potential county nexus were introduced during the 2018
legislative session. Of that, 30 bills that would have harmed county government were
defeated or favorably amended.
Select Bills: Defeated Select Bills: Favorably Amended
HB 2207 public meetings; audiovisual recordings; posting * HB 2003 coal mining; TPT; repeal Ch. 263
HB 2383 authorized emergency vehicles; probation officers* HB 2371 mobile food vendors; state licensure Ch. 286
HB 2386 notice of claim; requirements HB 2502 public safety; traumatic event counseling Ch. 259
HB 2396 property; subdivision; size; requirements HB 2538 U.S. house vacancy; special election Ch. 316
HB 2479 TPT; digital goods & services SB 1140 NOW: certificates of authority; video service Ch. 331
HB 2500 real estate signs; cities; counties SB 1274 public monies; recovery; illegal payments Ch. 253
HB 2518 prosecution expenses; county reimbursement; SB 1503 delinquent restitution; monthly report; hearing Ch. 226
repeal*
SB 1153 fire flow requirements; rural applicability
SB 1195 mental health screening; hospitalization
SB 1404 occupational regulation; municipalities; counties
SB 1492 payment in lieu of taxes
*Bill had a strike-everything amendment, underlying bill died

2018 Summary: By the Numbers
New County
County FY19
$8.9M $2.5M FY 19 HURF
GF Relief
Funding
Bad Bills
CSA Initiated 5 30 Defeated
Bills Signed
Or Amended

Emerging Issues
Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections
Legislative mix
Title 36: Court Ordered Evaluation
Lower Basin Drought Contingency
Plan
Related to Public Retirement
Systems Desegregation Levies
CORP/EORP reform
Expenditure Limitations
The Protect Arizona Taxpayers Act Regional Transportation Sales Tax
Constitutional amendment banning taxes
on services
Internet Sales Taxation & Digital Goods

Policy Development Process
Due : 08.13.18 09.20.18 10.03.18 – 10.05.18
Legislative Proposals CSA Board Meeting CSA Legislative Policy
County legislative proposals June/July/August – Not meeting Summit
should be submitted to be Hosted by Yuma County
considered by the Board at Hilton Garden Inn, Yuma Pivot
the CSA Summit. Point, Yuma