CSA MARICOPA OUTREACH PRESENTATION 2018 FINAL.PDF
Extracted text (via pymupdf_layout)
7671 characters
C O U N T Y S U P E R V I S O R S A S S O C I A T I O N BOARD BRIEFING MARICOPA COUNTY 5 3 R D L E G I S L A T U R E , S E C O N D R E G U L A R S E S S I O N 0 9 · 1 7 · 1 8 U.S. Executive, Congressional & Federal Agencies The Executive & State County State Legislature Agencies County Intergovernmental Supervisors, Administrators Engagement & Professional Staff Other County The Courts Elected Officials Strengthening Counties’ Intergovernmental Presence Appointments on Behalf of Counties FY17-18 • Governor’s Water Augmentation • PSPRS Advisory Committee Council • Arizona Management System • Governor's Water Solutions Process stakeholder groups • Groundwater workgroup • Arizona Department of Transportation • Colorado River workgroup • Arizona Department of Revenue • Detention Regionalization Taskforce, • Arizona Department of Water Resources Arizona Judicial Council • Arizona Criminal Justice Commission • Statewide Juvenile Justice, Legislative • AOC Commission on Technology Ad-hoc Committee • Constables Ethics, Standards and Training Board Using Data to Increase Capacity COLLECTION DISTRIBUTION CSA and county staff Master Database and County interface to collect data 1 2 Encyclopedia are tools for CSA staff collects data from county and CSA staff to easily third part sources access 15 county data from anywhere ADVOCACY ANALYSIS CSA legislative team uses individual and all-county 4 3 CSA staff uses revenue, data to build narratives that expenditure, demographic demonstrate the importance and other county data to of county priorities quantify the impacts of legislation 25 55 73 Interactive County Advocacy Datasets Encyclopedia Documents Documents Bills Introduced 1,206 Passed 369 Legislative Report County Relevant 220 Signed 346 2018 SESSION BY NUMBERS Ballot Propositions 2 Vetoed 23 Signed Rate 29% County Priorities • Eliminate recession-era cost shifts including: • ADJC • SVPs at ASH • Superior Court Judges’ Salaries • DUC Pool Payments • In-lieu Lottery • EORP circuit breaker for rural counties • Extend county “flexibility language” as a tool to meet county fiscal obligations State Budget: Maricopa County Results General Fund • ADJC - $6.7M in one-time relief • SVPs at ASH - $2.2M in ongoing savings • EORP Rate Floated (SB 1478)- $10.4M in ongoing liability • Phased in Superior Court Judges’ Salaries - $6.6M in savings in FY20 and $13.1M in ongoing savings in FY21 HURF • FY19 - $2.5M in additional transportation funding • FY20 - $3.7M in additional transportation funding FY19 In-Lieu FY19 Above FY19 EORP FY19 Net County Lottery Baseline Relief Impact Impact (now ongoing) Apache $0 $355,200 ($355,200) $0 Results by County Cochise $0 $622,500 ($622,500) $0 Coconino $0 $461,800 ($654,600) ($192,800) Additional Budget Tools Gila $0 $270,700 ($270,700) $0 FY19 Graham $0 $325,000 ($325,000) $0 • Flexibility Language Greenlee $0 $324,500 ($324,500) $0 • Omni-language up to $1.25M for counties with a population La Paz $0 $304,500 ($304,500) $0 less than 250K Maricopa $0 $8,891,500 ($10,389,800) ($1,498,300) • ADOR, ADJC & RTC payments Mohave $550,050 $706,500 ($895,300) $361,250 FY20 Navajo $0 $561,800 ($561,800) $0 • HB 2166: Additional VLT GF Pima $0 $3,342,000 ($2,414,000) $928,000 revenue Pinal $550,050 $995,900 ($1,025,000) $520,950 • Superior Court Judges’ phase-in: Santa Cruz $0 $404,100 ($404,100) $0 $6.6M Yavapai $550,050 $737,000 ($847,600) $439,450 FY21 Yuma $0 $528,700 ($757,000) ($228,300) • Superior Court Judges’ phase-in: Total $1,650,150 $18,831,700 ($20,151,600) $13.1M Figures are rounded Results by County County FY19 FY20 Apache $164,122 $245,131 Cochise $199,570 $298,077 HURF Restoration Coconino $236,898 $353,829 IMPACT OF NEW HIGHWAY SAFETY FEE Gila $89,788 $134,107 Graham $58,258 $87,014 Greenlee $22,048 $32,930 La Paz $96,012 $143,403 Results by HURF Recipient Maricopa $2,500,196 $3,734,275 Recipient FY19 FY20 Mohave $294,302 $439,568 Counties $5,969,800 $8,916,453 Navajo $196,357 $293,278 Cities $9,583,250 $14,313,404 Pima $1,027,356 $1,534,452 MAG ($3,020,625) $2,701,758 Pinal $469,822 $701,722 PAG ($1,006,875) $900,586 ADOT $-- $42,566,499 Santa Cruz $84,551 $126,284 Yavapai $279,825 $417,944 Yuma $250,696 $374,438 Total $5,969,800 $8,916,453 State Budget: Structural Balance FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Ongoing Revenues $ 9,749 $10,305 $10,742 $11,221 Ongoing Expenditures $ 9,639 $10,155 $10,697 $11,218 Structural Balance (Deficit) $ 110 $ 151 $ 45 $ 3 Carry Forward $ 341 $ 355 $ 281 $ 191 Fund Transfers $ 46 $ 116 $ 2 -- One-time Expenditures $ 183 $ 235 $ 95 $ 88 Ending Balance (Deficit) $ 204 $ 236 $ 188 $ 103 P U R P O S E Protect and enhance the county County Legislative resources and authorities Engagement necessary to promote efficient, responsive county government services to constituents. General effective date for bills: CSA Legislative Summary August 3, 2018 Available at 90 days after Sine Die www.countysupervisors.org CSA Initiated Legislation HB 2190 county improvement districts; repayment agreements Ch. 80 HB 2413 public road maintenance; primitive designation Ch. 16 SIGNED HB 2653 expenditure limitation; waiver of penalties Ch. 325 SB 1038 state land payments; payment method Ch. 18 SB 1113 zoning violations; notice; service Ch. 213 BUDGET HB 2274 county contributions; hospitalization; medical; repeal MESSAGING HB 2415 juvenile dependency proceedings fund HB 2439 county contributions; committed youth; repeal DID NOT ADVANCE SB 1410 transient lodging tax; rural counties Reactive Advocacy Approximately 440 bills with a potential county nexus were introduced during the 2018 legislative session. Of that, 30 bills that would have harmed county government were defeated or favorably amended. Select Bills: Defeated Select Bills: Favorably Amended HB 2207 public meetings; audiovisual recordings; posting * HB 2003 coal mining; TPT; repeal Ch. 263 HB 2383 authorized emergency vehicles; probation officers* HB 2371 mobile food vendors; state licensure Ch. 286 HB 2386 notice of claim; requirements HB 2502 public safety; traumatic event counseling Ch. 259 HB 2396 property; subdivision; size; requirements HB 2538 U.S. house vacancy; special election Ch. 316 HB 2479 TPT; digital goods & services SB 1140 NOW: certificates of authority; video service Ch. 331 HB 2500 real estate signs; cities; counties SB 1274 public monies; recovery; illegal payments Ch. 253 HB 2518 prosecution expenses; county reimbursement; SB 1503 delinquent restitution; monthly report; hearing Ch. 226 repeal* SB 1153 fire flow requirements; rural applicability SB 1195 mental health screening; hospitalization SB 1404 occupational regulation; municipalities; counties SB 1492 payment in lieu of taxes *Bill had a strike-everything amendment, underlying bill died 2018 Summary: By the Numbers New County County FY19 $8.9M $2.5M FY 19 HURF GF Relief Funding Bad Bills CSA Initiated 5 30 Defeated Bills Signed Or Amended Emerging Issues Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections Legislative mix Title 36: Court Ordered Evaluation Lower Basin Drought Contingency Plan Related to Public Retirement Systems Desegregation Levies CORP/EORP reform Expenditure Limitations The Protect Arizona Taxpayers Act Regional Transportation Sales Tax Constitutional amendment banning taxes on services Internet Sales Taxation & Digital Goods Policy Development Process Due : 08.13.18 09.20.18 10.03.18 – 10.05.18 Legislative Proposals CSA Board Meeting CSA Legislative Policy County legislative proposals June/July/August – Not meeting Summit should be submitted to be Hosted by Yuma County considered by the Board at Hilton Garden Inn, Yuma Pivot the CSA Summit. Point, Yuma