PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP P3 AGREEMENT.PDF

PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
AND
THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
AND
MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
AND
MARICOPA COUNTY ADMINISTERED BY ITS HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Article I: PURPOSE
The purpose of this Performance Partnership Agreement (Agreement) is to establish the terms
and conditions under which the U.S. Department of Education (ED), the U.S. Department of
Labor (DOL), the Arizona Board of Regents for and on behalf of Arizona State University (Pilot
Lead, or ASU), Maricopa County (County) administered by its Human Services Department
(HSD), and Maricopa County Regional School District (MCRSD) will participate in and
implement a Performance Partnership Pilot for Disconnected Youth (P3) (Pilot), consistent with
P.L. 113-76, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014, Division H, Section 526 (2014 Act);
P.L. 113-235, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (2015 Act);
P.L. 114-113, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (2016 Act); and P.L. 115-31, the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 (2017 Act) (together, the Acts). The Agreement contains
terms and conditions that are specifically required under section 526(c) of division B of the 2014
Act and also sets forth other provisions that are critical to the designation and implementation of
the Pilot.
Article II: PARTIES
ED is the lead Federal administering agency for the fiscal year (FY) 2015 P3 program (Lead
Federal Administering Agency) and will be responsible for Federal administration of the Pilot.
ED is also the consulting agency for this Pilot (Consulting Agency) and will be responsible for
the monitoring and oversight of this Pilot. For the purposes of this Agreement, DOL is the
participating Federal agency for this Pilot (Participating Federal Agency). All Federal agencies
that are authorized to participate in P3 pilots (Federal P3 Agencies), including this Pilot, have
separately entered into an Interagency Agreement (IAA) that governs their administration of the
P3 program.
ASU is the lead non-Federal agency for the Pilot (Pilot Lead).
The Lead Federal Administering Agency and Consulting Agency are entering into this
Agreement on behalf of the Participating Federal Agency, in accordance with Article IV,
paragraph B(3) of the IAA. The Pilot Lead, HSD, and MCRSD are entering into this Agreement
on behalf of all non-Federal entities that are participating in the Pilot (collectively non-Federal
partners). The Pilot shall be known as the Phoenix Manufacturing Apprenticeship Program or
MAP.

Article III: AUTHORITY
The parties are authorized to enter into this Agreement by section 526(c) of division B of the 2014
Act, the 2015 Act, the 2016 Act, and the 2017 Act.
Article IV: START-UP GRANTS
The Federal P3 Agencies have agreed to award, and have awarded, start-up grant funds to the
Pilot in the amount of $350,000. The Pilot will use the start-up grant funds for the purposes
described in the approved application.
Article V: FEDERAL PROGRAMS AND FUNDS INVOLVED IN THE PILOT
In accordance with the Pilot’s approved application 1and the approval of the Consulting Agency
and the Participating Federal Agency as to the Federal programs and funds to be involved in the
Pilot, and subject to the waivers described in Article VII of this Agreement, the Pilot will include
and use the Federal funds described in Attachment A to this Agreement to provide the services
and carry out the activities described in the Pilot’s approved application. Attachment A indicates
whether the Pilot will blend or braid specific funds, and the non-Federal partners agree that they
will use, and report on the use of, funds accordingly, as directed under Article X.A.3 of this
Agreement. Braided Federal funds will continue to be used and reported on in compliance with
the terms and conditions of their originating grant mechanism except where this Agreement
specifically provides for alternate terms and conditions, such as through waivers. Blended
Federal funds, regardless of their original source, will be used and reported on in compliance
with the terms of this Agreement. The Pilot may add other Federal funds to be used in the Pilot
after consultation with, and approval of, the Consulting Agency and any Participating Federal
Agency whose funds are involved. Such changes will be documented as an addendum to this
Agreement and must be approved in writing by the Consulting Agency, the affected Participating
Federal Agency, and the Pilot Lead.
Article VI: NON-FEDERAL PROGRAMS AND FUNDS INVOLVED IN THE PILOT
With the approval of the Consulting Agency and the Participating Federal Agency, the Pilot will
include and use the following non-Federal funds to carry out the activities and provide the services
described in the Pilot’s application, as approved:
Cost or Activity Amount of Non-Federal Fund Source
Funding (State, local, or tribal government
entity, or private entity)
OFY Employer Engagement Specialist $101,775 Silicon Valley Foundation
OFY Outreach Coordinator and peer $130,022 Silicon Valley Foundation
outreach interns
The Pilot may add other non-Federal funds to be used in the Pilot after consultation with, and
approval of, the Consulting Agency. Such changes will be documented as an addendum to this
Agreement and must be approved in writing by the Consulting Agency and the Pilot Lead.
1 The application was originally submitted by Maricopa County Educational Service Agency
(MCESA) but was subsequently transferred to ASU at MCESA’s request.
2

Article VII: ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE PILOT
The Pilot will use the funds described in Articles V and VI of this Agreement to enroll 96
disconnected youth ages 17 to 24 in MAP, as described in the Pilot’s application as amended by
this agreement. A comparison sample will also be used of 96 youth participating in a WIOA-
funded employment support program at the Human Services Department (HSD) of Maricopa
County. MAP is delivered in three phases:
1. Preparation. In the preparation phase, youth will participate in two concurrent activities
over 4 months: (A) Manufacturing Certification Course through GateWay Community
College and (B) Legacy I3 career-readiness training through TCI Solutions to equip them
with the academic skills and core competencies needed for success in employment in a
manufacturing position.
2. Bridging. In the bridging phase, youth who complete the 4-month MAP curriculum will
receive a manufacturing industry-recognized certification and will be connected to
manufacturing employers for interviews. A case manager from the Human Services
Department Workforce Development Division will assist the youth in preparing for
interviews. In the event that MAP graduates do not secure employment immediately
following the MAP certification course, we have developed a back-up plan through HSD
to give the youth a work experience through their ongoing employment support program.
3. Retention. In the retention phase, youth are provided case management assistance by the
MAP Case Manager from the Human Services Department Workforce Development
Division in securing related employment in manufacturing and, once employed, receive
12 months of coaching and job navigation support to promote their retention of
employment.
MAP participants who lack a high school diploma or its equivalent will be required to be co-
enrolled in high school or a high school equivalency program as a condition of their participation
in MAP. At the time an out-of-school youth who lacks a high school diploma or its equivalent
seeks to enroll in MAP, the MAP case manager will assist the youth in identifying and in
enrolling in the best educational option for the youth to resume his or her education. For youth
who are age 18 or younger, priority shall be given to options that enable them to earn a regular
high school diploma. The MAP case manager shall contact each MAP participant on a biweekly
basis to determine their educational progress and provide assistance in addressing any barriers to
continuing and completing their high school education.
The Pilot Lead (through a subcontracted evaluation firm, LeCroy & Milligan Associates) will
conduct a quasi-experimental study to determine if MAP participants demonstrate better
academic, behavioral, and employment outcomes than students who do not participate in MAP.
The Pilot Lead (through a subcontracted evaluation firm, LeCroy & Milligan Associates) will
also support a study of the causes that have led to school dropout and chronic absenteeism in
Maricopa County, including a report summarizing findings and actions that can be taken to
prevent such causes before students reach high school, and a plan to incorporate these actions
3

into future plans for activities under Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education
Act and related programs.
Article VIII: RESPONSIBILITIES OF NON-FEDERAL PARTNERS
Each non-Federal partner in the Pilot is legally responsible for carrying out the Pilot activities it
has agreed to perform in accordance with the Pilot’s application as approved by the Lead Federal
Administering Agency, Consulting Agency, and the Participating Federal Agency and for using
the Pilot funds in accordance with the Federal requirements that apply to the Pilot. Additionally,
non-Federal partners have the following specific responsibilities:
A. As the Pilot Lead, ASU is responsible for ensuring that the Pilot is carried out in
accordance with P3 requirements, other applicable Federal requirements, including
Federal civil rights laws and implementing regulations, and the Pilot’s approved
application and this agreement
B. As the Fiscal Agent, ASU is responsible for the proper use of all Federal funds included
in the Pilot, including start-up funds, and will ensure that any funds that are braided,
rather than blended, maintain their award-specific identity. The Fiscal Agent will comply
with all applicable laws and regulations, including rules regarding procurement and
accounting practices.
C. The non-Federal partners are responsible for contributing to reports about the progress of
the Pilot that the Pilot Lead must submit under Article X of this Agreement. The Pilot
Lead must submit these reports, on behalf of the Pilot, to the Lead Federal Administering
Agency, in accordance with Article X.A.3 of this Agreement.
D. The specific responsibilities of the participating non-Federal partners are:
Table 1. MAP Community Partners and Roles/Responsibilities
Partner Roles/Responsibilities
Arizona State Pilot Lead and Fiscal Agent; Project Oversight; Initiative
University (ASU), responsible for creating and implementing the MAP program for
College of Public Opportunity Youth in Phoenix; Coordination with all community
Service & Community partners and MAP staff to be hired from P3 award
Solutions and (Outreach/Engagement/Retention Team; MAP Program
Opportunities for Coordinator).
Youth (OFY)
Maricopa County Will contribute $60,000 in funds from Title I, Part A of the
Regional School Elementary and Secondary Education Act to support MAP program
District/ Hope College implementation, which will be used to partially cover the costs of
and Career Readiness TCI Solutions’ Legacy I3 career-readiness training.
Academy (HCCRA)
TCI Solutions, LLC Organization responsible for providing soft skills and job readiness
training to all P3 participants.
4

Arizona Manufacturing Organization representing manufacturers in Arizona. Responsible
Partnership for signing on manufacturing employers committed to
interviewing/hiring qualified P3 participants’ who complete MAP
program and obtain industry-recognized manufacturing certification.
Gateway Community Organization responsible for creating and administering the
College manufacturing certification course curriculum to P3 participants.
Maricopa County Agency will contribute (via braiding) $200,000 WIOA funds for
Human Services MAP program to cover MAP participants’ GateWay tuition for
Department (HSD) manufacturing certification course and ongoing case management
Workforce services for MAP and comparison group youth. Will provide
Development ongoing case management to 96 P3 participants, through existing
HSD staff and one MAP case manager, whose salary will be funded
through WIOA funding. Will use 96 youth enrolled in existing
WIOA-funded support program as comparison group for MAP
program evaluation.
LeCroy & Milligan Responsible for preparing the chronic absenteeism report as well as
Associates providing the process and outcomes’ evaluation of the MAP
program.
Article IX: WAIVERS
The Consulting Agency and the Participating Federal Agency have agreed to grant the following
waivers to the Pilot:
Program Waiver Citation
Title I, Part A of the Waive the limitation on serving ESEA Section
Elementary and individuals older than age 21. 1115(c)(1)(A)(i)
Secondary Education
Act (ESEA)
During the course of project implementation, the Consulting Agency, Participating Federal
Agency, and the Pilot may identify that additional waivers are needed. A request for an
additional waiver may be granted by the Consulting Agency or the appropriate Participating
Federal Agency, depending on the Federal program for which the Pilot is requesting the waiver,
if the Consulting Agency, or the Participating Federal Agency in consultation with the
Consulting Agency, determines that the additional waiver is appropriate and allowable. Such
waivers will be documented as an addendum to this Agreement and must be approved by the
Consulting Agency or affected Participating Federal Agency, as appropriate, and the Pilot Lead.
The non-Federal partners agree to implement the Pilot, and to use Federal program funds in the
Pilot, consistent with these waivers in order to provide the services described above in Article
VII and to maximize improved outcomes described in Article XI.A for the population to be
served.
5

Article X: ADMINISTRATION AND OVERSIGHT
A. Federal Administration and Oversight
The Lead Federal Administering Agency and Consulting Agency will support the
Pilot’s compliance with P3 and other Federal requirements. The Lead Federal
Administering Agency and Consulting Agency will ensure project consistency with
the Pilot’s application as amended by this agreement and approved by Federal P3
Agencies and P3 goals and objectives, as well as assist the Pilot in meeting its
benchmarks and objectives by providing necessary support and flexibility. The
following are, at a minimum, the responsibilities of the Lead Federal Administering
Agency and Consulting Agency:
1. The Lead Federal Administering Agency has awarded the start-up grant
funds to the Pilot and will generally administer the start-up grant,
including monitoring drawdowns by the Pilot and ensuring that the
Pilot’s use of the start-up grant funds is consistent with the Acts and
other applicable Federal laws and regulations.
2. The Lead Federal Administering Agency and Consulting Agency will
work collaboratively with the Pilot as it implements the approved Pilot
activities and carries out tasks identified in this Agreement.
3. The Lead Federal Administering Agency and Consulting Agency will
work with the Pilot to determine content of, and an appropriate schedule
for the submission of, reports about the progress of the Pilot in achieving
anticipated outcomes, including status updates, annual reports, interim
reports, and project work plans. The Pilot Lead acknowledges and
agrees that it will be required to work with the Lead Federal
Administering Agency and the Consulting Agency in this regard and to
agree to and comply with separate written conditions concerning
anticipated outcomes, performance measures, and reporting
requirements, and a schedule for the submission of reports. The Lead
Federal Administering Agency will receive all reports submitted by the
Pilot and will disseminate them to the Consulting Agency and the
Participating Federal Agency.
4. The Consulting Agency, on behalf of the Lead Federal Administering
Agency and the Participating Federal Agency, will serve as the lead
Federal monitor for the Pilot and will provide feedback on the Pilot’s
status updates, annual reports, any interim reports, and project work
plans.
5. The Consulting Agency will facilitate interaction with other offices
within the Consulting Agency and with the Participating Federal Agency
and Lead Federal Administering Agency, as needed, to assist the Pilot in
the execution of its plan, as well as interaction across other pilots when
necessary.
6

6. The Consulting Agency will serve as the primary point of contact for the
Pilot, maintaining communication and coordination with the Pilot;
responding to questions and concerns from the Pilot and elevating those
questions or concerns to the Lead Federal Administering Agency and
Participating Federal Agency, as appropriate; responding to performance
information from the Pilot, as described above in paragraph A.4; and
identifying challenges in implementation of the Pilot and coordinating
with the Lead Federal Administering Agency and the Participating
Federal Agency to assist the Pilot in addressing those challenges,
including, where appropriate, implementing corrective action after
consulting with the Lead Federal Administering Agency and the
Participating Federal Agency.
7. Except as provided elsewhere in this Agreement, the Consulting Agency
is not solely authorized to make any commitments or otherwise obligate
the Federal Government or authorize any changes that affect this
Agreement’s terms or conditions, the waivers granted, or the start-up
grant award.
B. State and Local Oversight Procedures
1. The Pilot Lead will manage the day-to-day operations of MAP and
monitor grant activities to assure compliance with applicable Federal
requirements, including Federal civil rights laws and implementing
regulations, and that performance expectations are being achieved.
2. Multiple levels of oversight based upon existing collaborative
relationships are designed to ensure adequate financial and programmatic
accountability of the MAP program. The oversight structure includes the
ASU Office of Research and Sponsored Projects Administration,
monitoring from the ASU Principal Investigator, human subjects’ review
board approval/monitoring, the Opportunities for Youth Leadership
Council, and daily site-based monitoring among P3 staff. Interactions
among the various levels will be facilitated by the MAP team that includes
representatives from AZ Manufacturing Partnership (Executive Director),
Maricopa County Workforce Department (Director), Opportunities for
Youth (Executive Director, MAP Program Coordinator, Program
Manager, Employer Engagement Specialist and Outreach Coordinator),
Maricopa County GateWay Community College (Career Advisor and
Lead Instructor), TCI Solutions, and LeCroy & Milligan Associates.
3. The MAP Team will report on a bi-monthly basis to the Opportunities for
Youth Leadership Council, the group of 43 governmental and non-
governmental agencies who oversee the work that Opportunities for Youth
does throughout Maricopa County in creating educational and career
pathways for opportunity youth.
7

4. The MAP Team will meet bimonthly to coordinate program
implementation, ensure program access for youth, and resolve/address
local barriers to service delivery.
5. ASU will serve as the lead agency for the MAP Team and provide
administrative support for the monthly meetings that focus on program
implementation (including outcome performance) and financial
accountability.
6. The MAP Team will send four representatives to all Federal P3 meetings
and ensure that all Federal Monitoring and Reporting requirements are
met.
7. The MAP Team will report annually to the AZ State Board of Education
and the AZ Department of Economic Security. These entities will provide
state monitoring on the implementation of the program waivers, blended
or braided funding, and whether or not the requested administrative
flexibility has improved the postsecondary success of MAP youth.
8. The MAP Team will report quarterly to representatives from the AZ
Department of Education and AZ Department of Economic Security to
provide them up-to-date information on the MAP implementation, as well
as quarterly financial reports.
9. Daily site-based monitoring will occur at the six Arizona@Work
locations:
 East Valley Career Center – 735 N Gilbert Rd. Ste.134 Gilbert, AZ
85234
 West Valley Career Center – 1840 N 95th Ave. Ste.160 Phoenix,
AZ 85037
 Mesa Library – 64 E. 1st St. (lower level) Mesa, AZ 85201
 Avondale – 124 S 4th St. Avondale, AZ 85323
 Tempe Escalante Center – 2150 E Orange St. Tempe, AZ 85281
 Peoria Community Center – 8335 W Jefferson St. Peoria, AZ
85346
as well as at HCCRA and GateWay by: 1) the Site Leads and outreach
workers who will screen youth for eligibility and refer them to the HSD
MAP Case Manager for intake, assessments and case management of
youth in the program; 2) the MAP Program Coordinator hired by
Opportunities for Youth to implement and oversee the MAP program; 3)
GateWay instructors who will administer the Manufacturing Certification
Course; and 4) TCI Solutions staff who will administer the career-
readiness training.
8

10. As described in the approved application, the MAP Program Coordinator,
who will be hired to manage the project, will complete weekly site walk-
throughs.
11. The evaluation consultant (LeCroy and Milligan Associates) will evaluate
the program.
Article XI: OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
A. The Pilot is designed to achieve the outcome(s) and interim indicator(s) described
in Attachment B.
B. The parties agree to monitor and assess the Pilot’s progress in achieving the
anticipated outcomes and interim measures described in Attachment B by using
the measurement methodologies in Attachment B. In addition, a quasi-
experimental study will be conducted to determine if MAP participants
demonstrate better academic, behavioral, and employment outcomes than youth
who did not participate in MAP.
C. The parties agree that no statutory, regulatory, or administrative requirements
related to Federal mandatory programs are barriers to the Pilot’s ability to achieve
the outcomes described in paragraph A
D. During the course of the Pilot, if the Lead Federal Administering Agency,
Consulting Agency, and Participating Federal Agency determine that the Pilot is
not achieving the outcomes described in paragraph A above, or is not properly
using start-up grant funds or other Federal funds involved in the Pilot in
accordance with the application as approved, or is not complying with applicable
Federal requirements in accordance with Articles VIII.A and X.B.1, they may
take any of a number of actions, which may include, but are not limited to:
1. Amending waivers to add or change conditions;
2. Granting additional waivers as determined to be appropriate and
approvable;
3. Providing technical assistance to the Pilot;
4. Requiring the Pilot to develop and implement a written corrective action
plan designed to assist it in implementing the Pilot in a manner that will
achieve the outcomes described in paragraph A above;
5. Prohibiting the Pilot from continuing to use specific Federal funds in the
Pilot;
6. Requiring the repayment of misspent Federal funds;
7. Amending this Agreement; and
8. Terminating this Agreement in whole or in part.
9

Article XII: EFFECTIVE DATE, TERM OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION
This Agreement shall become effective upon signing by all parties and shall be in effect until no
later than September 30, 2019. The parties anticipate that additional terms or conditions may or
will become a part of this Agreement, in accordance with Articles V, VI, IX, and X. The
Agreement may be otherwise revised upon mutual written agreement of all parties. In
accordance with Article XI.D.8, the Agreement may be terminated by the Lead Federal
Administering Agency, Consulting Agency, and Participating Federal Agency in the event that
they determine, through the oversight procedures described in Article X.A or otherwise, that the
Pilot is failing to maintain accountability for the funds used in the Pilot, including the start-up
funds, or to comply with any conditions of the approved application or waivers that the
Consulting Agency and Participating Federal Agency have granted, or because the Pilot has
failed to achieve the outcomes as described in Article XI.A.
Article XIII: GENERAL
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect the authority granted
by law to any of the Federal agencies that are parties to this Agreement or to the Secretaries or
heads thereof. The Lead Federal Administering Agency, with the assistance of the Consulting
Agency, will implement this Agreement consistent with applicable law and subject to the
availability of appropriations. This Agreement is not intended to, and does not, create any right
or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the
United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any
other person.
Article XIV: CONTACTS
U.S. Department of Education, Lead Federal Administering Agency
U.S. Department of Education, Lead Federal Consulting Agency
Corinne Sauri
Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
11-134 Potomac Center Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20202
Corinne.Sauri@ed.gov
(202) 245-6412
Braden Goetz
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
11-041 Potomac Center Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20202
Braden. Goetz@ed.gov
(202) 245-7405
10

U.S. Department of Labor, Participating Federal Agency
Sara Hastings
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
Office of Workforce Investment
Division of Youth Services
200 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20210
hastings.sara@dol.gov
(202) 693-3599
Arizona State University
Heather Clark
Office for Research and Sponsored Projects Administration
Arizona State University
P.O. Box 876011
Tempe, AZ 85287-6011
asu.awards@asu.edu
(480) 965-1427
Maricopa County Regional School District
Ernest Rose, Superintendent
Maricopa County Regional School District
3409 W. Whitton Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85017
Ernest.rose@mcrsd.org
(602) 763-3112
Maricopa County Human Services Department
Thomas Colombo, Assistant Director
Workforce Development Division
Maricopa County Human Services Department
234 N. Central Avenue
3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85004
ColomboT@mail.maricopa.gov
(602) 372-2733
11

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties have signed this Agreement:
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY:
Heather Clark, Director PreAward Services Date
Office for Research and Sponsored Projects Administration
Arizona State University
12

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT:
Steve Watson, President Date
Governing Board
Maricopa County Regional School District
13

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MARICOPA COUNTY:
Steve Chucri Date
Chairman
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
14

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION:
Kim R. Ford Date
Deputy Assistant Secretary,
Delegated the Duties of Assistant Secretary for Career,
Technical, and Adult Education
15

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR:
Date
16

PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
AMONG THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR, THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, MARICOPA COUNTY ADMINISTERED BY ITS
HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AND MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL
SCHOOL DISTRICT
Attachment A
FEDERAL PROGRAMS AND FUNDS INVOLVED IN THE PILOT
Federal Federal Federal Total amount Period of Blending
Program Administering account of program availability for funds or
Agency identifier funds Federal Braiding
included in obligation funds (as
Pilot (Year 1) approved
by Federal
P3
agencies)?2
Title I, Part U.S. 91 $60,000 July 1, 2017 to Blending
A of the Department of 2015/2016 September 30,
Elementary Education 1000 2018
and
(FY 2017-2018)
Secondary
Education
Act
Workforce U.S. 16 $200,000 April 1, 2018 to Braiding
Innovation Department of 2015/2016 June 30, 2019
and Labor 0174
(FY 2018-2019)
Opportunity
Act Title I
Youth
Program
P3 Start-Up U.S. 91 $350,000 September 1, N/A
Funds Department of 2015/2016 2017 to
Education 0400 September 30,
2019
2 If the Federal P3 agencies have approved blending of specific funds, the Pilot will merge those funds with other
funding streams, and the funds from each individual stream will lose their award-specific identity and become
subject to a single set of reporting requirements. If the Federal P3 agencies have approved braiding of specific
funds, the Pilot will coordinate the use of those funds with other funding streams, but the braided funds will
maintain their award-specific identity.
17

PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AMONG
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AND
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, AND MARICOPA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AND MARICOPA
COUNTY REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Attachment B
Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline3 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Education
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
Measure: 80% of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
participants who Cohort One = 24 located in and not working # of participants who X
enter the Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County completed MAP and 100
program without Cohort Three = 24 attained a secondary
a secondary Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth school diploma or its
school diploma or Program equivalent
its equivalent Total N = 96 Administrative Data # of participants who
who complete completed MAP and
MAP will attain a entered the program
secondary school without a secondary
diploma or its school diploma or its
equivalent within equivalent
6 months of MAP
program
completion.
3 WIOA Maricopa County and Phoenix Area Youth Program reports used to establish baseline service numbers – In 2013 a total of 1,212 youth were enrolled in
WIOA; in 2014 a total of 1,196 youth were enrolled in WIOA; and in 2015 a total of 1,123 youth were served. For each year, approximately half of those youth
who enroll are out-of-school youth. This project intends to enroll over a two-year period a total of N=96 MAP intervention youth.

Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline3 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Interim Indicator: Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
100% of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
participants Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
without high Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
# of participants who
school diploma or Cohort Three = 24 enroll in a secondary X 100
its equivalent Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth
educational program
enrolled in Program
educational Total N = 96 Administrative Data # of participants who
program that will entered MAP without a
lead to a secondary school
secondary school diploma or its
diploma or equivalent
recognized
equivalent within
3 months of entry
to MAP program.
Interim Indicator: Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
85% of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
participants Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
(n=82) enrolled Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
in MAP are Cohort Three = 24
retained and Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth # of participants who are
complete MAP Program retained / have X 100
programming. Total N = 96 Administrative Data completed MAP
# of participants enrolled
in MAP
19

Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline3 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Employment
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
Measure: 85% enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
(n=82) of Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
participants who Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County # of participants that X
complete MAP Cohort Three = 24 will attain employment 100
will enter Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth # of participants that
employment Program complete MAP program
within 3 months Total N = 96 Administrative Data
of completing
MAP program.
Interim Indicator: Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
90% (n=86) of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
MAP participants Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
who complete Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
MAP gain a Cohort Three = 24
Manufacturing Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth
Certificate / Program # of participants who
X
Credential. Total N = 96 Administrative Data complete MAP that 100
attain Certificate /
Gateway College Credential
Administrative Data # of participants who
complete MAP program
20

Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline3 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Interim Indicator: Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
85% (n=82) of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
MAP participants Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
complete career Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
“soft-skills” Cohort Three = 24
training. Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth # of participants that X
Program complete course 100
Total N = 96 Administrative Data # of participants enrolled
in MAP
TCI Solutions, Inc.
Administrative Data
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
Measure: 80% enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
(n=77) of youth Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
are retained by Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
an employer Cohort Three = 24
within the Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth
manufacturing Program # of participants that X
industry at 3, 6, Total N = 96 Administrative Data are retained in 100
and 9 months. employment
# of participants who
complete MAP
21

Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline3 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
Measure: 80% enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school # of participants that
(n=77) of youth Cohort One = 24 located in and not working reach average earnings X
reach average Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County goals 100
quarterly Cohort Three = 24 # of participants who
earnings goal of Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth complete MAP program
$6,120 in the Program
second quarter Total N = 96 Administrative Data
after exit
Barriers to
Success Index4
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17-
Measure: 80% enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school Quarterly
(n=77) Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
of youth served Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
by MAP case- Cohort Three = 24 # of participants that X 100
worker Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth experience fewer barriers
experience fewer Program # of participants who
barriers to Total N = 96 Administrative Data complete MAP program
success measured
at baseline Youth self-report,
(enrollment) and telephone interview
3, 6, and 9 / survey.
months post MAP.
4 Project staff and evaluator staff will identify a set of empirically based risk factors to monitor that can disrupt a participant’s ability to succeed in educational
and or career opportunities. Examples of these factors can include: Previous low levels of educational achievement; no formal employment experience; length
of time since in school or working; participant is homeless; lack of dependable transportation; participant and or family receives public assistance; participant
was ever arrested; limited literacy or math skills; living in temporary or emergency housing; is pregnant or has a child; has a mental or physical disability;
participant has significant health and or behavioral health issues; lack of access to health care provider(s); and or ever convicted of a crime.
22