PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP P3 SCOPE OF WORK.PDF

Performance Partnership Pilot for Disconnected Youth (P3) Award
Phoenix Manufacturing Apprenticeship Program (MAP)
SCOPE OF WORK
Version 1.8.18
Prepared by Kristin Ferguson-Colvin, Ph.D., ASU/OFY
The Arizona State University (ASU) College of Public Service & Community Solutions
(Principal Investigator: Kristin Ferguson-Colvin, Associate Professor, School of Social Work)
will serve as the Pilot Lead for the Performance Partnership Pilot for Disconnected Youth (P3)
award from the U.S. Department of Education, together with ASU staff from the Opportunities
for Youth (OFY) Initiative, housed at the ASU College of Public Service & Community
Solutions (Kristin Ferguson-Colvin, Principal Investigator; James Hoyt, Executive Director;
Kevin Katsuki, Program Manager). Various community partners also have prominent roles in the
creation, implementation, management, and evaluation of the project (see Table 1 below).
Table 1. MAP Community Partners and Roles/Responsibilities
Partner Roles/Responsibilities
Arizona State University Pilot Lead and Fiscal Agent; Project Oversight; Initiative
(ASU), College of Public responsible for creating and implementing the MAP program for
Service & Community Opportunity Youth in Phoenix; Coordination with all community
Solutions and partners and MAP staff to be hired from P3 award
Opportunities for Youth (Outreach/Engagement/Retention Team; MAP Program
(OFY) Coordinator).
Maricopa County Will contribute $60,000 in funds from Title I, Part A of the
Regional School District/ Elementary and Secondary Education Act to support MAP program
Hope College and Career implementation, which will be used to partially cover the costs of
Readiness Academy TCI Solutions’ Legacy I3 career-readiness training.
(HCCRA)
TCI Solutions, LLC Organization responsible for providing soft skills and job readiness
training to all P3 participants.
Arizona Manufacturing Organization representing manufacturers in Arizona. Responsible
Partnership for signing on manufacturing employers committed to
interviewing/hiring qualified P3 participants’ who complete MAP
program and obtain industry-recognized manufacturing certification.
Gateway Community Organization responsible for creating and administering the
College manufacturing certification course curriculum to P3 participants.
Maricopa County Human Agency will contribute (via braiding) $200,000 WIOA funds for
Services Department MAP program to cover MAP participant GateWay tuition for
(HSD) Workforce manufacturing certification course and ongoing case management
Development services for MAP and comparison group youth. Will provide
ongoing case management to 96 P3 participants, through existing
HSD staff and one MAP case manager, whose salary will be funded
through WIOA funding. Will use 96 youth enrolled in existing
WIOA-funded support program as comparison group for MAP
program evaluation.
1

LeCroy & Milligan Responsible for preparing the chronic absenteeism report as well as
Associates providing the process and outcomes’ evaluation of the MAP
program.
The P3 Project timeframe is from February 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019. During the grant
period, ASU, OFY, and the named community partners will use the P3 award and several
additional sources of blended funding (i.e., Title I funds) and braided funding (i.e., WIOA funds)
to create, implement, manage, and evaluate the Manufacturing Apprenticeship Program (MAP)
consistent with the original grant application submitted by the Maricopa County Educational
Service Agency (V420A160010)1 and the signed performance partnership agreement submitted
by ASU. Table 2 outlines the key components of the MAP.
Table 2. Proposed Key Components of MAP (Intervention Group)
Total Youth Served Intervention group: 96 young adults ages 17-24
disconnected from school and work settings at screening
+
Usual-services matched comparison group: 96 young adults
ages 17-24 disconnected from school and work settings at
screening, who are enrolled in the WIOA-funded HSD
Workforce Development Division employment support
program (through Maricopa County Workforce
Development)
Total youth served in overall project: 192 over 2 years
Student Breakdown 1 cohort every 4 months. 16-32 students per cohort. 8-16
students on Mon/Wed schedule. 8-16 students on
Tues/Thurs schedule
Total Time in Program 4 months @ 160 clock hours of Gateway College
Manufacturing Curriculum and 48 Hours of TCI Solutions’
soft skills curriculum
Class days for non-Hope College and Mon/Wed (Serving up to 16 students)
Career Readiness Academy
(HCCRA) Youth (i.e., youth with
high school diploma)
Class days for HCCRA Youth (i.e., Tues/Thurs (Serving up to 16 students)
youth without high school diploma)
Class schedule for all students First 3 hours soft skills; next 5 hours manufacturing class
Class location for all students Gateway Community College (Central City Campus)
Outreach Conducted by OFY Outreach Coordinator and Street
Outreach Team at six Arizona@Work Maricopa County
Centers and at HCCRA and at HCCRA. Outreach staff are
comprised of peer youth outreach workers (two peer
outreach workers will be hired through the P3 grant; an
additional 11 peer outreach workers and an outreach
1 See pages 16 through 24 of the project narrative for V420A160010 for a description of the MAP model.
2

coordinator position will be funded through another grant
source [Silicon Valley Foundation grant])
Youth Pre-Screening Completed by Outreach Team with support from HSD Case
Manager
Youth Enrollment Completed by HSD Case Manager
Employer Recruitment OFY Employer Engagement Specialist and MAP Program
Coordinator (OFY) will work with Arizona Manufacturing
Partnership and GateWay to secure Manufacturing
employers
Job Interview and Placement OFY Employer Engagement Specialist and MAP Program
Coordination Coordinator (OFY) will oversee job interview and
placement coordination of P3 participants with the support
of the HSD Case Manager
3

PERFORMANCE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AMONG
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AND
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY AND MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Attachment B
Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline2 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Education
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
Measure: 80% of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
participants who Cohort One = 24 located in and not working # of participants who X
enter the Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County completed MAP and 100
program without Cohort Three = 24 attained a secondary
a secondary Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth school diploma or its
school diploma or Program equivalent
its equivalent Total N = 96 Administrative Data # of participants who
who complete completed MAP and
MAP will attain a entered the program
secondary school without a secondary
diploma or its school diploma or its
equivalent within equivalent
6 months of MAP
program
completion.
2 WIOA Maricopa County and Phoenix Area Youth Program reports used to establish baseline service numbers – In 2013 a total of 1,212 youth were enrolled in
WIOA; in 2014 a total of 1,196 youth were enrolled in WIOA; and in 2015 a total of 1,123 youth were served. For each year, approximately half of those youth
who enroll are out-of-school youth. This project intends to enroll over a two-year period a total of N=96 MAP intervention youth.
4

Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline2 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Interim Indicator: Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
100% of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
participants Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
without high Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
# of participants who
school diploma or Cohort Three = 24 enroll in a secondary X 100
its equivalent Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth
educational program
enrolled in Program
educational Total N = 96 Administrative Data # of participants who
program that will entered MAP without a
lead to a secondary school
secondary school diploma or its
diploma or equivalent
recognized
equivalent within
3 months of entry
to MAP program.
Interim Indicator: Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
85% of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
participants Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
(n=82) enrolled Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
in MAP are Cohort Three = 24
retained and Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth # of participants who are
complete MAP Program retained / have X
100
programming. Total N = 96 Administrative Data completed MAP
# of participants enrolled
in MAP
5

Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline2 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Employment
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
Measure: 85% enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
(n=82) of Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
participants who Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County # of participants that X
complete MAP Cohort Three = 24 will attain employment 100
will enter Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth # of participants that
employment Program complete MAP program
within 3 months Total N = 96 Administrative Data
of completing
MAP program.
Interim Indicator: Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
90% (n=86) of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
MAP participants Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
who complete Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
MAP gain a Cohort Three = 24
Manufacturing Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth
Certificate / Program # of participants who
X
Credential. Total N = 96 Administrative Data complete MAP that 100
attain Certificate /
Gateway College Credential
Administrative Data # of participants who
complete MAP program
6

Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline2 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Interim Indicator: Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
85% (n=82) of enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
MAP participants Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
complete career Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
“soft-skills” Cohort Three = 24
training. Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth # of participants that X
Program complete course 100
Total N = 96 Administrative Data # of participants enrolled
in MAP
TCI Solutions, Inc.
Administrative Data
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
Measure: 80% enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school
(n=77) of youth Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
are retained by Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
an employer Cohort Three = 24
within the Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth
manufacturing Program # of participants that X
industry at 3, 6, Total N = 96 Administrative Data are retained in 100
and 9 months. employment
# of participants who
complete MAP
7

Final Interim and Report to Federal
Target How to Measure
Outcome Baseline2 Data Source (s) Government
Population Calculation/Frequency
Measures
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17- Quarterly
Measure: 80% enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school # of participants that
(n=77) of youth Cohort One = 24 located in and not working reach average earnings X
reach average Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County goals 100
quarterly Cohort Three = 24 # of participants who
earnings goal of Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth complete MAP program
$6,120 in the Program
second quarter Total N = 96 Administrative Data
after exit
Barriers to
Success Index3
Outcome Number of youth MAP Staff at AZ at Youth ages 17-
Measure: 80% enrolled in MAP: Work Centers 24 not in school Quarterly
(n=77) Cohort One = 24 located in and not working
of youth served Cohort Two = 24 Maricopa County
by MAP case- Cohort Three = 24 # of participants that X 100
worker Cohort Four = 24 WIOA Youth experience fewer barriers
experience fewer Program # of participants who
barriers to Total N = 96 Administrative Data complete MAP program
success measured
at baseline Youth self-report,
(enrollment) and telephone interview
3, 6, and 9 / survey.
months post MAP.
3 Project staff and evaluator staff will identify a set of empirically based risk factors to monitor that can disrupt a participant’s ability to succeed in educational
and or career opportunities. Examples of these factors can include: Previous low levels of educational achievement; no formal employment experience; length
of time since in school or working; participant is homeless; lack of dependable transportation; participant and or family receives public assistance; participant
was ever arrested; limited literacy or math skills; living in temporary or emergency housing; is pregnant or has a child; has a mental or physical disability;
participant has significant health and or behavioral health issues; lack of access to health care provider(s); and or ever convicted of a crime.
8

Project Timeline: January 1, 2018 – September 30, 2019
Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19
MAP Program Planning
and Partner Commit-
ments/Subcontracts
Hire Staff
C1 Recruitment
C1 Program Enrollment
C1 Interview/Placement
C1 Follow Up Supports
assuming done by WIOA
Case Manager
C2 Recruitment
C2 Program Enrollment
C3 Recruitment
C2 Interview/Placement
C2 Follow Up Supports
assuming done by WIOA
Case Manager
C3 Program Enrollment
C4 Recruitment
C3 Interview/Placement
C3 Follow Up Supports
assuming done by WIOA
Case Manager
C4 Program Enrollment
C5 Recruitment (if
needed)
C4 Interview/Placement
C4 Follow Up Supports
assuming done by WIOA
Case Manager
C5 Program Enrollment (if
needed)
C5 Interview/Placement
C5 Follow Up Supports
assuming done by WIOA
Case Manager
9