IGA BUREAU OF RECLAMATION RE ALL ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED

United States Department of the Interior
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Lower Colorado Region
Phoenix Area Office
6150 West Thunderbird Road
TN REPLY REFER TO: Glendale, AZ 85306-4001
PXAO-7000
2.2,4.21 FEB 2 6 2018
VIA EXPRESS MAIL
William D. Wiley, P.E.
Chief Engineer and General Manager
Flood Control District of Maricopa County
2801 West Durango Street
Phoenix, AZ 85009
Subject: Transmission of Agreement No. 18-GI-32-0001 (Agreement) and Plan of Study for
Identifying Key Areas in the City of Phoenix for Infiltration and Retention Using Low Impact
Development for the Floodplain Watershed Restoration Study (Study) for Signature
Dear Mr. Wiley:
Thank you for participating in the subject Study. We look forward to working with the Flood Control
District of Maricopa County (FCDMC) and the other non-federal cost-share partners: The Nature
Conservancy, City of Phoenix, and Maricopa County, by the Maricopa County Air Quality Department.
Please find enclosed an original copy of the subject Agreement and Plan of Study. Additionally, please
find five (5) copies of the signature page for the FCDMC. Please provide original signatures for each of
the five pages so that the Bureau of Reclamation may distribute a copy of the Agreement and Plan of
Study with original signatures to each Study partner. Please return the signature pages to: Bureau of
Reclamation, Attn: Ms. Deborah Tosline, 6150 West Thunderbird Road, Glendale, AZ 85306.
If you have questions regarding the Study, please feel free to contact Ms. Deborah Tosline by email at
dtosline@usbr.gov, or at 623-773-6277.
Sincerely,
Leslie A. Meyers
Area Manager
Enclosures - 2


AGREEMENT NO. 18-0I-32-0004
BETWEEN THE
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, CITY OF PHOENIX, AND
MARICOPA COUNTY
TO PROVIDE FUNDS AND IN-KIND SERVICES FOR
IDENTIFYING KEY AREAS IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INFILTRATION AND RETENTION
USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE
ELOODPLAIN WATERSHED RESTORATION STUDY
1 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2018, by and among
The Nature Conservancy, hereinafter referred to as "the Conservancy"; the City of Phoenix, hereinafter
referred to as "Phoenix"; the Flood Control District of Maricopa County, hereinafter referred to as
"FCDMC"; and Maricopa County, by the Maricopa County Air Quality Department hereinafter referred
to as "MCAQD"; which at times are collectively referred to as "Partners", and the Bureau of Reclamation,
hereinafter referred to as "Reclamation", all of which are at times collectively referred to as "Parties,"
pursuant to the Act of Congress approved June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388), and acts amendatory thereof or
supplementary thereto, all of which acts are commonly known and referred to as Reclamation Law,
the Act of March 4, 1921, referred to as the Contributed Funds Act, and Public Law 115-31,
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2017, which authorized the expenditure of funds to conduct the study
titled, Identifying Key Areas in the City of Phoenix for Infiltration and Retention Using Low Impact
Development (Study).
WITNESSETH
2. EXPLANATORY RECITALS
2.1 WHEREAS, Reclamation in the above mentioned Acts has been authorized by Congress for
said Study; and
2.2 WHEREAS, Study activities shall include, but are not limited to, those shown in the attached
Plan of Study hereto referred to as Attachment A and incorporated herein by reference; and
2.3 WHEREAS, Reclamation has programmed funds under the Central Arizona Project program
to conduct said investigations and cooperative planning efforts; and
2.4 WHEREAS, Reclamation seeks a 50 percent Non-Federal cost share by Partners together
through direct funding or in-kind services; and
2.5 WHEREAS, the Partners seek to support and participate in said investigation: and
2.6 WHEREAS, Reclamation and the Conservancy will provide direction in the development
and completion of said Study.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, Parties hereto agree as
follows:
1

3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
3.1 To the extent that funds are advanced or in-kind services are provided by the Partners, and
that Federal funds are appropriated for this purpose, the Parties, with staff or by contract, shall use said
funds and in-kind services to complete the work program as set forth in Attachment A.
3.2 Upon completion, Reclamation and the Conservancy shall transmit the final Study to the
remaining Parties as outlined in Attachment A.
4. TERM OF AGREEMENT
4.1 This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by all parties, and shall remain in
effect until the Study is completed unless otherwise terminated as provided herein. The Parties hereto
anticipate that the study will be completed in three years.
5. COORDINATION AND PROGRESS REPORTS
5.1 The study team will be formed which shall include at least one representative from
Reclamation and one representative from each of the Partners. Other entities may be added to the team
with approval of representatives from both Reclamation and the Partners.
5.2 Reclamation shall submit to the Partners on an annual basis a report of actual expenditures on
Study work. A separate account shall be maintained by Reclamation for all the work performed on the
Study, with costs identifiable by Study task. This account and related records shall be available for
inspection, audit, and reproduction by the Partners without charge during normal business hours. During
progress of the Study, all operations of either Reclamation or the Partners, pertaining to the Study, shall
be open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Partners or Reclamation, and if work is not
being done in a mutually satisfactory manner, the Parties may terminate this agreement as specified in
herein.
6. STUDY MANAGER
6.1 The Parties hereby agree that Reclamation and the Conservancy shall provide Co-Study
Managers, who shall perform and carry out the duties and responsibilities required under this Agreement.
The Reclamation and Conservancy Co-Study Managers shall pursue the work diligently, with an
objective of meeting the scheduled dates as found in Attachment A.
6.2 Subject only to the express limitations of this Agreement, the Co-Study Managers are
authorized in the development of the Program Plan to incur costs, liabilities, and obligations up to the
amounts approved and funded by the Parties to this Agreement and to perform or arrange for the
perfaimance of Study investigations.
7. STUDY FUNDING
7.1 The Partners and Reclamation will each provide in-kind cost share to meet Study
requirements, except as discussed in Article 7.2.
7.2 Reclamation funding is subject to annual appropriation by the Congress of the United States,
as described in Article 11. If funds available to Reclamation are interrupted, or if the Partners wish to
2

accelerate the pace of the Study where feasible, the Partners may advance additional funds for Study
Purposes. Such additional funds, at the option of the Partners, would be counted as an increase in the
Partners share of Study costs.
7.3 The cost of the Study is expected to be $389,100 with a minimum of 50 percent contributed
by the Non- Federal Partners and up to 50 percent contributed by Reclamation. Reclamation's financial
contribution to the Study shall not exceed 50 percent of the total cost. All or part of the Non-Federal
Partners' share may be provided as in-kind services.
8. IN-KIND SERVICES •
8.1 In-kind services provided by the Partners will be comprised of tasks that would otherwise be
performed by Reclamation in completing the work program as provided in Attachment A. Permissibility
of these costs will be determined in accordance with 2 CFR Part 225, Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circular A-87, revised May 10, 2004, "Cost Principles for State, Local, and Tribal Governments";
and OMB Circular A-122, "Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations," revised May 10, 2004,
Copies of OMB Circulars are available on the Internet at:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/information-for-agencies/circulars
8.2 The value of in-kind services provided by the Partners or others on behalf of the Partners
shall be credited toward the Non-F
ederal parties cost-share total as documentation is received that said
in-kind services have been accomplished. Such documentation is required on at least an annual basis.
8.3 Credit given for in-kind services performed prior to the date of enactment of this agreement
will be limited to those costs incurred after January 1, 2017 for preparation of the scope of this Study and
the resulting cost-share agreement.
8.4 In-kind services not specifically detailed in Attachment A will be credited only if said service
is approved in advance by Reclamation.
8.5 Source records supporting in-kind service credit will be retained for three years following
completion of the Study.
9. CHANGES AND DISPUTES
9.1 It is recognized that the schedule of activities and costs of conducting the Study are an
estimate based on perceived requirements prior to initiation, and that changes are likely to occur. It is
also anticipated that the Plan of Study will be revised from time to time as changes occur in the physical
dimensions of the Study plan and alternatives thereto, the technical effort needed to complete the Study,
and the cost of the Study. If and when the Partners and Reclamation agree that a change in the activities
or costs described in the Plan of Study is necessary and feasible, the Plan of Study may be modified in
writing to reflect the change by having all Parties signas to the agreed upon changes.
9.2 Should disputes arise over the provisions of, or performance under this Agreement,
representatives of the Partners and Reclamation will attempt to resolve the situation. Should the situation
be unresolvable, termination procedures described under Article 12 apply.
3

10. LIABILITY
10.1 Reclamation shall perform its obligations under this Agreement in the capacity of a Federal
agency. It is neither a co-venturer, agent, employee, nor representative of the Partners. The Partners
assume no liability for claims or actions arising solely out of the performance of such work by
Reclamation's employees or agents.
10.2 Liability of the United States resulting from the negligence of its employees shall be
governed by the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 2671, et seq.). The Partners recognize that the
Federal Tort Claims Act operates to provide liability coverage for the United States Government and its
employees in lieu of ordinary insurance coverage.
10.3 The Partners shall be liable for loss, damage, or expense to any other Party caused by
intentional and wrongful act, action, neglect, omission, or default in connection with in-kind services
provided by the Partners under this Agreement.
11. CONTINGENT ON APPROPRIATION OR ALLOTMENT OF FUNDS
11.1 The expenditure or advance of any money or the performance of any obligation by the
United States under this Agreement shall be contingent upon appropriation or allotment of funds by
Congress. Absence of appropriation or allotment of funds shall relieve the Partners from any obligation
under this Agreement. No liability shall accrue to the United States in case funds are not appropriated.
12. TERMINATION
12.1 The Partners or Reclamation may terminate work under this Agreement by giving thirty
(30) days written notice of termination.
12.2 In the event that the Agreement is terminated by any Party before the work has been
completed, a concluding report summarizing work program accomplishments at the time of termination
will be prepared by Reclamation and made available to the Partners and other interested Federal and State
agencies.
13. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
13.1 All information and data obtained or developed by Reclamation, in connection with
development of the Study (exclusive of intra-governmental communications) shall be available upon
request, except where prohibited by law, to the Partners without further charge. However, use of said
reports, data, and information shall appropriately reference Reclamation and the Partners as the source.
13.2 Data compiled and the results of studies performed under this Agreement will become
public domain upon the completion of the investigation and Study report, or upon completion of a
concluding report under the provisions of Article 12.
13.3 Any Confidential Information including (1) trade secrets or commercial or financial
information that is privileged or confidential under the meaning of 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) (2) critical
infrastructure information as defined in 6 U.S.C. § 131(3), and (3) information considered to be a security
risk if shared in the public domain, shall be clearly marked "confidential" or "proprietary" by the
4

submitter, shall be maintained by the Conservancy during data compilation, shall not be shared in the
public domain, and shall not be disclosed by the Recipient without permission of the owner.
To the extent either party orally submits its confidential information to the other party, the submitting
party will prepare a document marked "CONFIDENTIAL" embodying or identifying in reasonable detail
such orally submitted confidential information and provide the document to the other party within thirty
(30) days of disclosure. Information is not confidential and need not be treated as such if it is:
(1) available in the public domain, (2) lawfully disclosed to the public during the study, and (3) not
marked "confidential" or "proprietary" by the submitter. The Parties should make every reasonable
attempt to prevent disclosure of confidential information to the public and shall make reasonable efforts
to consult with the submitter prior to disclosure of such.
It shall not be a breach of this Agreement if the Non-Federal Partners are required to disclose the
Confidential Information by a valid order of a court or other government body, or as otherwise required
by law, or as necessary to establish the rights of the parties under this Agreement; PROVIDED THAT the
Non-Federal Partners shall provide prompt prior notice thereof to Reclamation to enable Reclamation to
seek a protective order or otherwise prevent such disclosure, and PROVIDED FURTHER THAT the
Confidential Information otherwise shall continue to be confidential.
It shall not be a breach of this Agreement if Reclamation is required to disclose the Confidential
Information by a valid order of a court or other government body, or as otherwise required by law, or as
necessary to establish the rights of the parties under this Agreement; PROVIDED THAT Reclamation
shall provide prompt prior notice thereof to the Non-Federal Partners to enable the Non-Federal Partners
to seek a protective order or otherwise prevent such disclosure, and PROVIDED FURTHER THAT the
Confidential Information otherwise shall continue to be confidential.
14. DELAYS
14.1 To the extent that performance of an obligation under this Agreement is prevented or
delayed by any cause which is beyond the reasonable control of either Party to the Agreement, the
non-performing Party shall not be deemed to be in default.
14.2 Should the non-performing Party be deemed to be in default, the Partners and Reclamation
will follow the procedures described under Article 9.
15. JURISDICTION
15.1 Federal and Arizona laws govern this Agreement. In case of conflict between Federal and
State law, Federal law controls.
16. JUDICIAL REMEDIES NOT FORECLOSED
16.1 Nothing herein shall be construed as: (a) depriving the Partners from pursuing and
prosecuting any remedy in any appropriate court of the United States or appropriate State which would
otherwise be available to the Partners, even though provisions herein may declare that determinations or
decisions of Reclamation's authorized representative or other persons are conclusive, or (b) depriving the
Partners of any defense thereto which would otherwise be available.
5

17. NOTICES AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES
17.1 Notice given pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, or which are necessary to carry
out its provisions, must be in writing to the authorized representative. The Parties' authorized
representatives may be amended by written notice to the parties':
1. For Reclamation:
Co-Study Manager: Deborah Tosline, Hydrogeologist/Prograrn.
Manager, Program Development Division
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
6150 West Thunderbird Road
Glendale, Arizona 85306
Study Backup Manager: Mary Reece, Manager
Program Development Division
2. For the Conservancy:
Co-Study Manager: Maggie Messersehmidt,
Urban Conservation Program Manager
The Nature Conservancy
7600 N 16'h Street, Suite 100
Phoenix, Arizona 85020
Study Alternate Representative: Lisa McCauley,
Spatial Analyst
3. For Phoenix:
Study Representative: Tricia Bailiff,
Environmental Programs Coordinator
Office of Environmental Programs
Phoenix City Hall
200 W. Washington, 14th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Study Alternate Representative: Hilary Hartline
Environmental Quality Specialist
6

4. For FCDMC:
FCDMC Study Representative: Harry R. Cooper, PLA
Landscape Architecture and Water Conservation
Branch Manager
Flood Control District of Maricopa County
2801 West Durango Street
Phoenix, AZ 85009
FCDMC Study Alternate Representative: Kaylee R. Colter, PLA
Landscape Architect/Planner
5. For Maricopa County: .
MCAQD Representative: Ira Domski
Consultant to the Director
Maricopa County Air Quality Department
1001 N Central Ave, Suite 125
Phoenix, AZ 85004
MCAQD Study Alternate Representative: Mike Fulton
Deputy Director
18. INTEGRATIONS
18.1 No representations or promises are binding on Reclamation or the Partners, except those
representations and promises contained in this Agreement or in some future written representations or
promises signed by both Parties. The provisions referenced herein constitute to the complete and final
agreement between the Parties.
19. OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT
19.1 No member of or delegate to Congress, or resident Commissioner, shall be admitted to any
share or part of this contract, or to any benefit arising from it. However, this clause does not apply to this
contract to the extent that this contract is made with a corporation for the corporations general benefit.
20. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and the year
written above. The following authorized signatures are attached
A. THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
B. THE CITY OF PHOENIX
C. FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY
D. MARICOPA COUNTY AIR. QUALITY DEPARTMENT
E. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
7


Attachment A
Plan of Study
IDENTIFYING KEY AREAS IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INFILTRATION AND
RETENTION USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
Partner Agencies and Organizations: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) — The
Nature Conservancy (the Conservancy) — City of Phoenix (Phoenix) — Flood Control
District of Maricopa County (FCDMC) — and Maricopa County Air Quality Department
There is a need for information by agencies responsible for stormwater management of where
Low Impact Development (LID) application is most beneficial. To address these issues, the
study, "Identifying Key Areas in the City of Phoenix for Infiltration and Retention Using Low
Impact Development" will develop a strategy to identify optimum locations for municipal and
regional LID implementation. Study questions include:
1. Which catchments within Phoenix are most feasible for stormwater retention or
infiltration to augment water quantity through distributed LID features?
2. Where should LID features be placed to reduce the impacts of erosion and
sedimentation?
3. What other benefits could be gainedfrom implementation of these types of infiltration
projects?
LID includes a series of low-tech/low-cost land engineering and development features that
minimize built infrastructure, control stormwater runoff near its origin, and help recharge
aquifers and restore watersheds, in addition to playing an important role in Smart Growth, Green
Building, and helping with Clean Water Act compliance. LID emphasizes both land and water
conservation, and with its rninimalistic dependence on infrastructure, LID utilizes on-site natural
features that help protect water quality while retaining the natural hydrology of the site and
preserving its before-development water runoff characteristics.
Providing analysis of LID implementation in priority catchments can help to inform LID
planning decisions by municipalities.
This study will assess the suitability of drainages in Phoenix for stamiwater retention and
infiltration. Suitable locations will be selected using Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
analyses to assess and rank sub-drainages where LID features that promote infiltration can meet
multiple water-related goals including increasing water supplies and water quality improvements
while simultaneously mitigating heat and flood risk and improving air quality.
The following work will be completed during the study.
Phase
1. Develop Problem Statement:
a. Erosion and sedimentation
b. Vegetation and water for vegetation
Page 1 of 7

Attachment A
Plan of Study
IDENTIFYING REY AREAS IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INFILTRATION AND
RETENTION USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
c. Air quality
d. Heat vulnerability
e. Flood risk
2. Conduct literature review for LTD features and associated co-benefits.
3. Identify alternative LTD features:
a. Retention LID
1) Retention features with trees
2) Retention features without trees
b. Infiltration LTD
1) Infiltration features with trees
2) Infiltration features without trees
e. Select 6-12 features to use in the suitability analysis
4. Conduct Catchment suitability analysis:
a. Compile list of available data and references for suitability analysis:
1) Partners will provide data that they manage and indicate whether
any of the information is sensitive. Any data which should not be shared in
the public domain will be managed accordingly through data sharing
agreements. The Nature Conservancy may prepare sensitive data for use in
the study by performing analyties and providing new data layers for
incorporation into reports and analysis under the public domain
2) The Conservancy will compile the following data: urbanized
catchments, localized flooding, LANDSAT data related to soil moisture,
USDA soil maps, NAM land use classification, MAG future land use, air
quality data, flood risk, and heat vulnerability
3) Reclamation will compile physical data on soil porosity, hydraulic
conductivity, permeability, specific yield, and groundwater data such as
depth to groundwater / groundwater elevations, and groundwater change,
and any other relevant hydro-geological data
4) All partners will be asked to review and vet compiled data to
assess the suitability of the data
b. Develop criteria and ranking for biophysical suitability and social favorability of
catchments. All partners will be asked to participate in meetings to establish
criteria for the following parameters:
1) Soils
2) Vegetation
Page 2 of 7

Attachment A
Plan of Study
IDENTIFYING KEY AREAS IN THE CITY OF PHOENDC FOR INFILTRATION AND
RETENTION USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
3) Air quality
4) Flood risk
5) Heat vulnerability
6) Water quality (where available)
c. Conduct spatial analysis to assess suitability of catchment configurations most
appropriate for LID features
d. Apply criteria - the Conservancy GIS analyst will apply the criteria to select
catchment(s) using the spatial analysis methodology developed during the study
e. Review draft results - Partners and stakeholders will be invited to participate in a
meeting to review preliminary results to address issues or revisions
f. The Conservancy and Reclamation will prepare a document summarizing the
spatial analysis for inclusion in the Summary Report
5. Summary Report for Phase I:
a. Presentation(s) to participating organizations and agencies
Phase II
6. Model selected catchments using Stormwater Management Model-PC SWMM or a
comparable model:
a. Compile and collect site specific data for selected catchments by Reclamation and
the Conservancy representatives.
I) Conduct records search for model input data (Reclamation)
2) Conduct site visits to groimdtruth reported data
3) Conduct field tests to collect infiltration rates, surface water flow
measurements, land use patterns, slope, and other pertinent data
(Reclamation and the Conservancy representatives)
b. Develop model to evaluate a variety of Low Impact Development (LID) scenarios
to determine which lead to the greatest improvement in stormwater quality and
quantity.
I) Load model inputs (raw data)
2) Calibrate the model
3) Develop (3) LID scenarios using criteria and ranking
• Collaborative stakeholder process will be used to develop and
select an arrangement of LID retention or infiltration features, as
determined appropriate by the spatial analysis, in order to test
variations in outcomes determined by the model; seek agreement
on the outcomes that the model will provide
4) Run storm simulations in model to study impacts on water volume,
drainage patterns, sediment transport and soil moisture
• 10 yr storm
Page 3 of 7

Attachment A
Plan of Study
IDENTIFYING KEY AREAS IN THE CITY OF PHOENDC FOR INFILTRATION AND
RETENTION USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
• 20-5Oyrstoitn
• 100 yr storm or more
5) Observe modeling outcomes, which may include one or more of
the following:
• Conduct master planning type studies, with quick assignment of
multiple LIDs and treatment areas
• Compare the continuous hydrologic and water quality benefits
(peak ranoff, total flow volume, pollutant load etc.) of various LID
implementations with scenario comparison tools
• Assess methodology to evaluate health parameters associated with
vegetation (heat or thermal comfort; air quality)
6) Utilize modeled outcomes and correlated changes to vegetation to
determine expected heat (thermal comfort) and air quality impacts
(PM2.5) under the explored scenarios
7. Phase IL Final Report:
a. Reclamation and the Conservancy will prepare a draft report for review by
partners and stakeholders, incorporate comments and prepare the final report
b. Reclamation and the Conservancy representatives will make presentations to 3 or
more public and participating organizations which may include the Economic
Development Committees or Planning Committees of the City of Phoenix,
Arizona Alliance for Livable Communities, Sustainable Cities Network, Central
Arizona Conservation Alliance, stakeholder organizations (Flood Control District
of Maricopa County, Maricopa County Air Quality Department, The Nature
Conservancy, Bureau of Reclamation, City of Phoenix)
Page 4 of 7

Attachment A
Plan of Study
IDENTIFYING KEY AREAS IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INFILTRATION AND
RETENTION USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
Partner Agency / Participation
Organization
The Nature Conservancy Co-Study Manager participatory process, data compilation
and review, write summary reports, organize and attend
meetings, GIS spatial analysis
Bureau of Reclamation Co-Study Manager participatory process, provide assistance
with data compilation and review, summary reports, meeting
organization, GIS spatial analysis, and surface water flow
modeling
City of Phoenix Attend meetings, provide and vet data, review work products
and reports
Flood Control District of Attend meetings, provide and vet data, review work products
Marieopa County and reports, support flow modeling as applicable
Maricopa County Air Quality Attend meetings, provide and vet data, review work products
Depaitment and reports
Page 5 of 7

Attachment A
Plan of Study
IDENTIFYING KEY AREAS IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INFILTRATION AND
RETENTION USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
Study Schedule
Project Management 11111.11111MIIIIIII IIII1
Develop problem statement
Literature review
Identify alternative LID features
Catchment suitability analysis LII
Phase I summary report
Stormwater and Vegetation Modeling
Phase ll Final report
0 365 730 1095
Days
III Time in Days
Page 6 of 7

Attachment A
Plan of Study
IDENTIFYING KEY AREAS IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INFILTRATION AND
RETENTION USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
COST ESTIMATE - INFILTRATION AND RETENTION USING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
Non-Federal Cost Share Federal Share
Task Task Description COP FCDMC NICACID TNC Reclamation
Project management 34,687 66,000
Stakeholder and Study Team coordination and meetings 24,620 14,780 4,390 6,570 13,200
Task 1. Develop problem statement 2,240 1,790 310 1,073 2,200
`Task 2. Literature review 2,990 1,790 240 3,600 6,600
Task 3. Identify alternative LID features 2,240 1,340 240 3,240 5,940
Task 4. Catchment suitability analysis 2,980 1,340 1,260 20,400 48,700
Task 5. Phase I summary report 4,480 2,690 470 6,000 11,000
Task 6. Stormwater management model PCSWMM 5,970 3,580 1,250 39,630 15,400
Model software license 2,160
Task 7. Phase II Final report 4,480 . 2,690 940 4,800 8,800
TOTALS $ 50,000 $ 30,000 $ 9,100 $ 120,000 $ 180,000
Page 7 of 7


20. AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES (cont.)
A. THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
By:
Patrick Graham
Title: State Director
Office: The Nature Conservancy in Arizona
Date:
8


20. AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES (cont.)
A. THE CITY OF PHOENIX
By:
Rosanne Albright
Title: Acting Environmental Programs Administrator
Office: Office of Environmental Programs
Date:
9


20. AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES (cont.)
A. FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY
By:
William D. Wiley, P.E.
Title: Chief Engineer and General Manager
Office: Flood Control District of Maricopa County
Date:
10


20. AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES (cont.)
A. MARICOPA COUNTY AIR QUALITY DEPARTMENT
By:
Philip A. McNeely, R.G.
Title: Director, Maricopa County
Office: Air Quality Department
Date:
11


20. AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES (cont.)
A. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
By:
Leslie Meyers
Title: Area Manager
Office: Phoenix Area Office
Date:
12