180007-CONTRACT - ARRINGTON WATKINS.PDF

ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT (TERM)
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
Architectural Services On-Call
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Office of Procurement Services
Serial # 180007-ROQ
Contract # 180007-ROQ
C-73-
Pro j ect # 180007-ROQ
Three (3) YEAR TERM
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT
Facilities Management Department
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page I

Table of Contents
RECITALS 4
SECTION I - ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES 4
SECTION II- PERIOD OF SERVICE 5
SECTION III - REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6
SECTION IV - COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES 7
SECTION V - COMPENSATION AND PAYMENTS 7
SECTION VI- PROJECT CONSTRUCTION BUDGET AND COST ESTIMATES 8
SECTION VII- ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 8
SECTION VIII- TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 9
SECTION IX - OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 9
SECTION X - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 9
SECTION XI- INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE 10
SECTION XII - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 12
SECTION XIII - NO KICK-BACK 13
SECTION XIV - NONDISCRIMINATION, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, & AMERICANS
WITH DISABILITIES; SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY 13
SECTION XV - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 13
SECTION XVI - CONFLICTS 14
SECTION XVII - CONTINGENCY FEE 14
SECTION XVIII - MATERIALITY AND WAIVER OF BREACH 14
SECTION XIX - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 14
SECTION XX - SEVERANCE 14
SECTION XXI - JOINT PREPARATION 15
SECTION XXII - PRIORITY OF PROVISIONS 15
SECTION XXIII - APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE 15
SECTION XXIV - AMENDMENTS 15
SECTION XXV - PRIOR AGREEMENTS 15
SECTION XXVI - DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE 15
SECTION XXVII - INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE 15
SECTION XXVIII - LEGAL WORKER REQUIREMENTS 15
SECTION XXLX - ATTACHMENTS 16
SECTION XXX - NOTICES 16
SECTION XXXI - CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION 17
SECTION XXXII - CONTRACT EXECUTION 17
SECTION )(XXIII - ISRAEL BOYCOTT 17
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 2

EXHIBIT A - PROJECT SERVICES 19
I - GENERAL 19
II- PRE-DESIGN SERVICES PHASE 19
III - SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE 19
IV - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 20
V - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 20
VI - QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 21
VII- BIDDING PHASE 22
VIII- CONSTRUCTION PHASE 22
IX - ARCHITECTS REQUIRED ADDITIONAL SERVICES 24
X - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL(s) 24
EXHIBIT B — HOURLY RATES 27
EXHIBIT C - MARICOPA COUNTY SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION
REPORTING FORM 28
EXHIBIT D - LEGAL WORKER CERTIFICATION 29
EXHIBIT E - ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 30
EXHIBIT F RECORD DRAWING PROCEDURES 35
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 3

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AND Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC
FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES.
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
hereinafter called the "COUNTY" and Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC; hereinafter called the
"ARCHITECT."
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes § 11-251(8) and § 34-102, the Board of Supervisors has the authority
to enter into contracts for the construction of such buildings and structures are necessary, and for
alterations thereto, and for the employment of architects as warranted by the type of construction.
B. The COUNTY proposes to engage the service of an architectural firm to perform certain architectural and
engineering services for the COUNTY on an "on-call" or "as needed" basis. This Agreement is intended
to cover performance by the ARCHITECT under individual Task Orders. The terms of this Agreement
and a Task Order govern the ARCHITECT's work unless the ARCHITECT and the COUNTY agree
otherwise in writing.
C. The COUNTY may require drawings, plans, specifications, cost estimates, construction administration,
and other architectural services, and the ARCHITECT is willing to prepare such drawings, plans,
specifications, cost estimates, provide construction administration, and perfoim other architectural services
under this Agreement as may be required by the COUNTY.
D. The COUNTY desires to contract with the ARCHITECT for the preparation of such drawings, plans,
specifications, cost estimates, construction administration, and other architectural services on such terms
and conditions as hereinafter follows:
E. NOW THEREFORE, on consideration of the premises and the mutual promises herein contained, the
COUNTY and the ARCHITECT agree as follows:
SECTION I - ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES
A. GENERAL
1. The ARCHITECT shall prepare drawings, specifications and cost estimates according to the direction
and designated standards of the COUNTY. Also, in consideration of the fee hereinafter stated, the
ARCHITECT agrees, if requested by the Owner, to perform contract administration, inspection
services and other architectural services on the PROJECT as described in this Section. It is understood
and agreed that the County's authorized Administration for the PROJECT shall be the Director of
Facilities Management Department, or designee.
2. The ARCHITECT shall review the requirements of the PROJECT as outlined by the COUNTY. Prior
to performance of any services under this Agreement, the ARCHITECT and his consultants shall meet
with the authorized COUNTY personnel to review the scope and nature of the work to be perfoimed.
3. The ARCHITECT shall be responsible for providing written minutes of all PROJECT meetings that
occur during the course of this work under this Agreement, which are attended by the ARCHITECT or
his representative and by the representatives of the COUNTY. A copy of these minutes shall be sent
to, and received by, the COUNTY no later than three (3) working days after the meeting date. The
ARCHITECT will be responsible for final publishing and distributing of meeting minutes as directed
by the COUNTY.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 4

SECTION III- REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
A. Reimbursable expenses are additional compensation for Basic and Additional Services that include actual
expenditures made by the ARCHITECT, employees of the Architect, or the Architect's professional
consultants in the interest of the Project and have the specific prior written approval of the COUNTY. The
ARCHITECT hereby agrees that no reimbursable expense shall be incurred, nor requested for payment,
without the ARCHITECT having obtained prior written approval of the COUNTY. The COUNTY is
under no obligation to pay the ARCHITECT for such expenses without evidence of the COUNTY'S
written consent prior to the ARCHITECT incurring such expenses. Reimbursable expenses may be
approved for:
1. Printing costs by a non-COUNTY contracted printing service vendor according to Subsection C
below, if requested by the COUNTY for additional plan review sets or for bidding purposes. It is the
Owner's intent to provide 3rd party reproduction and printing services at the Owner's expense. Any
printing expense incurred by the Architect or its consultant requires Owner's prior written approval.
2. Permit fees if levied by an authorized regulatory agency and paid directly by the ARCHITECT with
the COUNTY'S permission.
3. Approved travel expenses where travel is required as part of the project scope shall be billed by
ARCHITECT only for those travel expenses that are in compliance with the Federal Travel
Regulation, CFR Chapter 300-304, as applicable. All out of state travel expenses must be pre-
approved by the County in writing.
B. Costs associated with naimal office supplies and equipment expenses shall not be considered as Additional
Reimbursable Expenses paid by the COUNTY as these costs shall be considered as noimal overhead and
operating costs which are factored into the ARCHITECT's fee. Normal overhead and operating costs shall
include but are not limited to:
1. Paper, pens, pencils, copier supplies, and computer media.
2. Drafting supplies tools & equipment.
3. Telephone and facsimile equipment, rental & toll charges.
4. Office rental, utility, and other overhead expenses.
5. Plan and specification reproduction costs for CONSULTING review purposes.
6. Postage and delivery costs.
7. Use or rental of computer equipment or related supplies.
8. Overtime work necessary to meet deadlines stipulated within the COUNTY' s Notice to Proceed.
C. Unless specifically authorized in writing in advance as part of the approve scope of work, the COUNTY
will not pay for any of the following expenses of the ARCHITECT:
1. Vehicle mileage to any COUNTY-owned facility located within the State of Arizona.
2. Vehicle mileage for the ARCHITECT or its sub-consultants to attend project related meetings located
within the State of Arizona.
3. Meal costs for employees of ARCHITECT or its sub-consultants whether or not employees of the
COUNTY are in attendance for meetings or other gatherings related to project work for the COUNTY,
except where authorized in writing in advance for out-of-state consultants/sub-consultants traveling to
Arizona or out of state travel related to the assignment.
D. Unless specifically authorized in writing, the ARCHITECT shall use the COUNTY contracted printing
vendor for all reproduction work if copies are required by the COUNTY in addition to the review
document sets required elsewhere in this Agreement.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 6

4. The ARCHITECT will meet with the COUNTY and representatives of appropriate jurisdictional
agencies to review the requirements of the project and the solutions proposed by the ARCHITECT at
times appropriate to the PROJECT. At no time shall the ARCHITECT meet with jurisdictional
agencies without prior consent or attendance of COUNTY representatives.
5. The ARCHITECT may be required to coordinate with the COUNTY and its designated furniture
vendor for the design and provisions for installation of open office workstations. This work may
include but is not limited to: layout of workstations per COUNTY standards, providing backgrounds
on AutoCAD to the vendor for shop drawing purposes, coordination with the electrical systems of the
building, and provision in the specifications for installation of COUNTY supplied workstations by the
Contractor.
6. As a part of basic services, the ARCHITECT will produce record drawings from the marked-up As-
Built drawings prepared by the Contractor. Record drawings shall be submitted on CD discs as
required by the COUNTY containing the complete drawings in electronic format — both in an Adobe
PDF file and an AutoCAD DWG file with all external references bound. Requirements for the content
within drawings and file formatting are identified in Exhibit F.
7. Typical project services are listed in attached Exhibit A. The compensation method shall be
determined on a project by project basis, utilizing Exhibit B ("Hourly Rates").
SECTION II- PERIOD OF SERVICE
A. The initial contract shall be in effect for no longer than Three (3) calendar years from the date of approval
by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. If work is underway under the terms of this contract at the
time of the expiration date, the contract expiration date shall be extended to the date for completion of
services underway. Furtheirnore, by mutual written agreement between the County and ARCHITECT, this
contract may be extended for a period of Two (2), One (1) year period(s). The total term of this contract,
including all extension periods, shall not exceed five (5) years.
B. Based upon the mutually agreed scope of work for a project, the ARCHITECT shall submit to the
COUNTY an anticipated schedule for completion of each phase of the project. The ARCHITECT will be
required to complete total design phase basic and additional services as required within the total allotment
of time.
C. The time required by the COUNTY, or its designee or regulatory agencies, for reviews or approvals shall
be included in the allotted calendar days for Design phase and shall be considered to be included in each
project schedule. ARCHITECT revisions, additions and corrections required by the COUNTY through its
review of each phase's first document submittal, shall be required as part of the work of each subsequent
phase if applicable. A time extension will not be granted during such phase for these document
modifications. Construction document revisions as required by regulatory agencies and the COUNTY
shall be accomplished by the ARCHITECT within the stated period for that phase.
D. The ARCHITECT may provide construction administration services from the date of construction contract
award through the PROJECT construction period and final written acceptance of the PROJECT by the
COUNTY regardless of the project delivery method selected. For purposes of this contract, the PROJECT
shall be completed when final payment has been made to the Contractor and the Owner has confirmed that
all Record Documents have been provided by the Architect to the Owner and are complete workable files.
E. The ARCHITECT may be required to provide reviews and reports during the one-year post construction
warranty period. The one-year period shall be in addition to the total design and construction periods of
service.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 5

E. The ARCHITECT shall accompany each payment request for Reimbursable Expenses with a copy of the
original vendor invoice for any and all Reimbursable Expense costs. The COUNTY reserves the right to
reject any and all requests for payment of Reimbursable Expenses costs where no invoice or receipt is
attached.
F. The ARCHITECT shall only be paid the actual amount charged to the ARCHITECT by the original
vendor for Reimbursable Expenses.
G. Refer to Exhibit "B" for hourly billing rates for ARCHITECT staff and sub-consultants.
SECTION IV - COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES
A. The COUNTY shall provide the following:
1. Review of documents submitted by the ARCHITECT.
2. Sufficient copies, electronic access or electronic files of all COUNTY forms required to be completed
by the ARCHITECT as described in this Agreement.
3. Response to the ARCHITECT's written request for decisions within a reasonable amount of time, such
time being appropriate to the request.
4. The necessary staff for consultation with the ARCHITECT during program review, schematic, design
development and construction document phases in order to identify problems, needs and other
functional aspects of the PROJECT.
5. Staff for consultation with the ARCHITECT and Contractor during the course of construction.
6. Periodic updates on the progress of reviews and requests for infoimation, progress of submittals and
deliveries of equipment and furniture to be supplied by the COUNTY.
7. All required fees for securing approvals from governmental and other agencies having lawful
jurisdiction over the design of the PROJECT. The COUNTY will pay such fees directly to
jurisdictional authorities.
B. THE CONSTRUCTION BUDGET. The COUNTY shall monitor both ARCHITECT and Contractor
performance during the period of perfounance of the ARCHITECT's services under this Agreement. The
COUNTY's monitoring of the ARCHITECT'S and Contractor's perfoimance shall be solely for the
information of the COUNTY and shall not be construed to abridge, limit, supplement, or modify the
ARCHITECT'S duties and responsibilities to provide the usual and customary basic architectural services,
including, but not limited to, the services and duties specifically described in this Agreement.
SECTION V - COMPENSATION AND PAYMENTS
A. The ARCHITECT shall be compensated for contracted services that have been authorized in writing by the
COUNTY. The ARCHITECT shall be compensated on an hourly fees basis in accordance with those
items listed in Exhibit B — Hourly Rates.
B. All ARCHITECTURAL service requests for payment shall be submitted to the COUNTY for review in
electronic format and approval and must be accompanied by a detailed invoice as required by the
COUNTY. A detailed invoice shall include copies of all related invoices and substantiating receipts; a
completed SBE reporting form; and/or other documentation for any charges incurred. Where pre-
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 7

authorization is required by the COUNTY, a copy of the written pre-authorization of the COUNTY will be
included with the invoice where those charges are submitted.
1. Invoices shall be submitted to: FMD-AccountsPayable@mail.maricopa.gov with all required
supporting documentation. Invoices should not be hand-delivered, mailed or otherwise transmitted.
C. The ARCHITECT's fee for contract administration services shall be due and payable monthly during the
progress of the construction work, and shall be contingent on the percentage of the work completed by the
Contractors.
D. The ARCHITECT shall be limited to a maximum total fee of Three Million Dollars, and No-Cents
($3,000,000.00) for all work on all projects assigned under this Agreement during the ter in of this contract.
This shall include fees for both basic, additional services, and reimbursable expenses for all proj ects
assigned to the ARCHITECT during the term of the contract.
E. Payment for additional services as authorized by the COUNTY shall be made upon completion of the
additional services and upon receipt of a detailed invoice and request for payment.
F. If the PROJECT is abandoned or suspended in whole or in part, for a period of more than 180 days
through no fault of the ARCHITECT, the ARCHITECT is to be paid for the services actually performed in
accordance with ARS Section 34-104.F, but not for any services not actually performed.
SECTION VI- PROJECT CONSTRUCTION BUDGET AND COST ESTIMATES
A. Until such time as construction bids have been received for the PROJECT, the ARCHITECT shall treat the
PROJECT Construction Budget and all estimates of construction cost as confidential information. Under
no circumstances shall the ARCHITECT cause the publication of the PROJECT Construction Budget or
construction cost estimates or reveal same to anyone other than authorized COUNTY personnel.
B. To help ensure that the PROJECT is under budget and if requested by the Owner, the ARCHITECT shall
include, as part of the bid package, deductive alternates which represent up to 10 percent of the PROJECT
construction budget and do not materially affect the basic function, operation, or design intent of the
facility. The ARCHITECT will identify and make recommendations on the various alternates, but accep-
tance of any or all of the alternates will be the sole responsibility of the COUNTY.
C. The successful construction bid as herein referenced, means the bid amount submitted by the Contractor
actually awarded the PROJECT by the Board of Supervisors and shall include the cost for all work
designed or specified by the ARCHITECT.
D. Over-Budget Bids. In the event a PROJECT is bid and the lowest responsible bid is higher than the
COUNTY construction budget amount for the specific project, the COUNTY may reject all bids or
appropriate such additional moneys as are necessary to award the bid. In the event the COUNTY elects to
reject all bids, the COUNTY may direct the ARCHITECT to revise the drawings, plans, and specifications
at no additional expense to the COUNTY in order to obtain a bid for construction not exceeding the
construction budget amount.
SECTION VII - ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS
A. Records of the ARCHTECT's direct personnel payroll, and reimbursable expense pertaining to the
PROJECT and accounts between the COUNTY and ARCHITECT shall be kept on a generally recognized
TERM - ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 8

accounting basis for a period of no less than nine years after final completion of the PROJECT and shall be
available to the COUNTY (on reasonable notice) for examination during nonnal business hours.
SECTION VIII- TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. The COUNTY and the ARCHITECT hereby agree to the full perfonnance of the covenants herein, except
that the COUNTY reserves the right, at its discretion, to terminate or abandon the service provided for in
this Agreement, or abandon any portion of the ARCHITECT's services or portion of the PROJECT for
which services have been performed by the ARCHITECT.
B. In the event the COUNTY shall abandon the services, or any part of the services, as herein provided, the
COUNTY shall notify the ARCHITECT in writing, and immediately after receiving such notice, the
ARCHITECT shall discontinue advancing the work under this Agreement. Notification shall be made in
writing to the ARCHITECT's principal place of business.
C. Upon such termination or abandonment, the ARCHITECT shall appraise the work completed and submit
his appraisal to the COUNTY for evaluation. The COUNTY shall have the right to inspect the
ARCHITECT' s work to appraise the work completed.
D. Except when terminated for delinquency, insolvency, or non-compliance with the tei ins of this Agreement,
the ARCHITECT shall receive as compensation for services performed to the date of such termination, a
fee for the percentage of the ARCHITECT's services as provided in this Agreement under Section V, and
that fee shall be in the amount to be agreed mutually by the ARCHITECT and the COUNTY. If there is
no mutual agreement, the COUNTY will use the same method used for "Additional Services" as a guide in
the final determination. In no event, however, shall the fee exceed that set forth in Section VI of this
document. The ARCHITECT will not be paid for any services not actually perfolined.
SECTION IX - OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
A. The ARCHITECT may retain ownership of original drawings, specifications, and related documents;
however, the COUNTY shall have ownership of the reproducible specifications and other contract
documents as referred to in Section I, paragraph 3, and Section I, paragraph 6, which are to be delivered to
the COUNTY before the final payment is made to the ARCHITECT. The COUNTY will not reuse, alter
or modify these reproducible's for other construction projects without first soliciting consultation from the
ARCHITECT. In the event such documents are used without further consultation from the ARCHITECT,
the COUNTY agrees to hold the ARCHITECT harmless from any claim arising from the reuse of these
documents for subsequent construction work.
SECTION X - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. The use of words "he", "himself', "his" or other terms of masculine gender is intended to apply to both
genders, whether male or female.
B. All services provided by the ARCHITECT under this Agreement shall be performed by employees, agents
or Consultants of the ARCHITECT who are experienced and skilled in their profession and shall be
performed in accordance with the standards of care and workmanship in their profession. The
ARCHITECT's findings, recommendations and professional advice shall be based on practices and
procedures customarily applied in his profession. The ARCHITECT shall be solely responsible for the
completeness and accuracy of his drawings, plans, specifications, supporting data and documents prepared
or complied by either his staff or his Consultants in fulfillment of this Agreement.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 9

C. The ARCHITECT shall make no agreements with his Consultants which abridge, modify or conflict with
the requirements of this Agreement.
D. The ARCHITECT shall require each Consultant, by an appropriate written agreement, of the extent of the
services to be performed by the Consultant on the PROJECT, to be bound to the ARCHITECT by the
terms of this Agreement, and to assume toward the ARCHITECT all the obligations and responsibilities
which the ARCHITECT, by this Agreement, assumes with the COUNTY. Said agreement shall preserve
and protect the rights of the COUNTY under this Agreement with respect to the services to be performed
by the Consultant so that the Consulting Services thereof will not prejudice such rights and shall allow to
the Consultant, -unless specifically proved otherwise in the ARCHITECT-CONSULTANT agreement, the
benefits of all rights, remedies and redress against the ARCHITECT, that this ARCHITECT, by this
Agreement, has against the COUNTY. Where appropriate, the ARCHITECT shall require each Consultant
to enter into similar agreements with his sub-consultants. The ARCHITECT shall make available to each
proposed Consultant prior to the execution of the ARCHITECT-CONSULTANT written agreements,
copies of this Agreement to which the Consultant will be bound by this paragraph, and identify to the
Consultant any tern's and conditions of the proposed ARCHITECT-CONSULTANT written agreement
which may be at variance with this Agreement. Each Consultant shall similarly make copies of this
Agreement available to his sub-consultants.
E. During the course of PROJECT construction, should any defects be revealed which would adversely affect
the appearance or function of the PROJECT and which are the result of errors, omissions, or
inconsistencies in the drawings and specifications prepared by the ARCHITECT, the ARCHITECT shall,
at his expense, modify these drawings and specifications to resolve the defective conditions to the
satisfaction of the COUNTY without additional compensation.
SECTION XI— INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
A. INDEMNIFICATION - To the fullest extent permitted by law, ARCHITECT shall defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless COUNTY, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials, and employees from and
against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney fees, court costs,
expert witness fees, and the cost of appellate proceedings, relating to, arising out of, or alleged to have
resulted from the negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful acts, errors, omissions or mistakes of the
ARCHITECT, his agents, representatives, employees, or consultants related to the performance of the
Contract. ARCHITECT's duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY, its agents,
representatives, officers, directors, officials, and employees shall arise in connection with any claim,
damage, loss or expense that is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease, death, or injury to,
impairment, or destruction of property, including loss of use resulting therefrom, caused by the referenced
acts, errors, omissions or mistakes in the perfoimance of this Contract including those made by any person
for whose acts, errors, omissions or mistakes ARCHITECT may be legally liable.
The amount and type of insurance coverage requirements set forth herein will in no way be construed as
limiting the scope of the indemnity in this paragraph.
B. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS - ARCHITECT, at ARCHITECT's own expense, shall purchase and
maintain the herein stipulated minimum insurance from a company or companies duly licensed by the
State of Arizona and possessing a current A.M. Best, Inc. rating of In lieu of State of Arizona
licensing, the stipulated insurance may be purchased from a company or companies, which are authorized
to do business in the State of Arizona, provided that said insurance companies meet the approval of
COUNTY. The foim of any insurance policies and foims must be acceptable to COUNTY.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 10

1. All insurance required herein shall be maintained in full force and effect until all work or service
required to be performed under the terms of the Contract is satisfactorily completed and formally
accepted. Failure to do so may, at the sole discretion of COUNTY, constitute a material breach of this
Contract.
2. ARCHITECT's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects COUNTY, and any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by COUNTY shall not contribute to it.
3. Any failure to comply with the claim reporting provisions of the insurance policies or any breach of an
insurance policy warranty shall not affect the COUNTY'S right to coverage afforded under the
insurance policies.
4. The insurance policies may provide coverage that contains deductibles or self-insured retentions. Such
deductible and/or self-insured retentions shall not be applicable with respect to the coverage provided
to COUNTY under such policies. ARCHITECT shall be solely responsible for the deductible and/or
self-insured retention and COUNTY, at its option, may require ARCHITECT to secure payment of
such deductibles or self-insured retentions by a surety bond or an irrevocable and unconditional letter
of credit.
5. COUNTY reserves the right to request and to receive, within 10 working days, certified copies of any
or all of the herein required insurance policies and/or endorsements. COUNTY shall not be obligated,
however, to review such policies and/or endorsements or to advise ARCHITECT of any deficiencies in
such policies and endorsements, and such receipt shall not relieve ARCHITECT from, or be deemed a
waiver of COUNTY'S right to insist on strict fulfillment of ARCHITECT's obligations under this
Contract.
6. The insurance policies required by this Contract, except Workers' Compensation, and Errors and
Omissions, shall name COUNTY, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials and
employees as Additional Insureds.
7. The policies required hereunder, except Workers' Compensation, and Errors and Omissions, shall
contain a waiver of transfer of rights of recovery (subrogation) against COUNTY, its agents,
representatives, officers, directors, officials and employees for any claims arising out of
ARCHITECT'S work or service.
C. ARCHITECT is required to procure and maintain the following coverage's:
1. Commercial General Liability. Commercial General Liability insurance and, when necessary,
Commercial Umbrella insurance with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 for each occurrence,
$2,000,000 Personal/Advertising Injury, $4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate, and
$4,000,000 General Aggregate Limit. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form
property damage, and blanket contractual coverage, and shall not contain any provision that would
serve to limit third party action over claims. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the
CGL limiting the scope of coverage for liability arising from explosion, collapse, or underground
property damage.
2. Automobile Liability. Commercial/Business Automobile Liability insurance and, if necessary,
Commercial Umbrella insurance with a combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage
of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence with respect to any of the Architect's owned, hired, and
non-owned vehicles assigned to or used in performance of the Architect's work or services under this
Contract.
TERM - ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 11

3. Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by federal
and state statutes having jurisdiction of the Architect's employees engaged in the performance of the
work or services under this Contract; and Employer's Liability insurance of not less than $1,000,000
for each accident, $1,000,000 disease for each employee, and $1,000,000 disease policy limit.
ARCHITECT waives all rights against COUNTY and its agents, officers, directors and employees for
recovery of damages to the extent these damages are covered by the Workers' Compensation and
Employer's Liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance obtained by ARCHITECT pursuant to
this Agreement.
4. Errors and Omissions (Professional Liability) Insurance. Errors and Omissions (Professional
Liability) insurance and, if necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance, which will insure and provide
coverage for errors or omissions or professional liability of the Architect, with limits of no less than
$2,000,000 for each claim.
D. COVERAGES
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence
$2,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury
$4,000,000 General Aggregate
$4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations
Automotive Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence
Workers' Compensation $1,000,000 Each Accident
$1,000,000 Disease for Each Employee
$1,000,000 Disease Policy Limit
Errors and Omissions $2,000,000 Each Claim
E. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE - Prior to commencing work or services under this Contract,
ARCHITECT shall furnish COUNTY with Certificates of Insurance in a foim acceptable to COUNTY, or
formal endorsements as required by the Contract in the form provided by the County, issued by
ARCHITECT'S insurer(s), as evidence that policies providing the required coverage's, conditions and
limits required by this Contract are in full force and effect. Such certificates shall identify this contract
number and title.
1. In the event any insurance policy(ies) required by this contract is(are) written on a "claims made"
basis, coverage shall extend for two years past completion and acceptance of ARCHITECT'S work or
services and as evidenced by annual Certificates of Insurance.
2. If a policy does expire during the life of the Contract, a renewal certificate must be sent to COUNTY
fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration date.
F. CANCELLATION AND EXPIRATION NOTICE - Insurance required herein shall not expire, be
canceled, or materially changed without thirty (30) days prior written notice to COUNTY.
SECTION XII - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
A. The COUNTY and the ARCHITECT each binds himself, his partners, successors, assigns, and legal
representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns, and covenants
of this Agreement. Neither the COUNTY nor the ARCHITECT shall assign, sublet, or transfer his interest
in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. In no event shall any contractual relation be
created by this Agreement between any third party and the COUNTY. In the event ARCHITECT changes
the name of the firm to which this contract has been awarded, it is incumbent upon ARCHITECT to
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 12

request COUNTY through the Procurement Officer to prepare the appropriate agreement to reflect the
ARCHITECT's name change. In the event ARCHITECT chooses not to change its name for work
accomplished through this awarded contract, ARCHITECT will issue all payments on the letterhead of the
firm contracted with the COUNTY under this contract. Failure to comply may result in the invoices of
ARCHITECT being refused, which will result in a delay of payment to ARCHITECT at no additional cost
to COUNTY.
SECTION XIII- NO KICK-BACK
A. The ARCHITECT warrants that no person has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this
Agreement upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent
fee, and that no member of the Board of Supervisors, or any employee of Maricopa County has any
interest, financial or otherwise with the ARCHITECT and his firm.
B. For breach or violation of this warrant, Maricopa County shall have the right to annul this Agreement
without liability, or at its discretion to deduct from the agreement prior to consideration, the full amount of
such commission, percentage, brokerage, and contingent fee.
1. This Agreement and its Notice to Proceed and any addendums thereto shall be subject to ARS Section
38-511.
SECTION XIV - NONDISCRIMINATION, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, &
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES; SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY
A. This Contract is made in accordance with and subject to the provision of all applicable laws, statutes,
ordinances, rules, regulations, executive orders and codes. To the extent required by applicable law, each
party hereto shall comply and require its Subcontractors and suppliers to comply with all then applicable
federal, state of Arizona and local nondiscrimination laws, rules, regulations, ordinances and executive
orders, including, without limitation, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as they may be amended, modified, codified, supplemented
or repealed from time to time.
B. It is Maricopa County's policy to provide Small Business Enterprises (SBE) with the opportunity to
participate in the County's solicitation process and to be considered to fulfill the requirements for various
commodities and services. This contract has no requirement for utilization of SBEs, however it does
require that utilization of SBE firms by ARCHITECT be reported for tracking by the County. A full
description of the County's SBE program and the contractual requirements are attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference in Exhibit C.
C. CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all provisions and requirements of Arizona Executive Order 2009-
09 including flow down of all provisions and requirements to any subcontractors. Executive Order 2009-
09 supersedes Executive order 99-4 and amends Executive order 75-5 and may be viewed and downloaded
at the Governor of the State of Arizona's web site
http://www.azgovemor.gov/dms/upload/E0_2009_09.pdf which is hereby incorporated into this contract
as if set forth in full herein. During the perfoimance of this contract, CONTRACTOR shall not
discriminate against any employee, client or any other individual in any way because of that person's age,
race, creed, color, religion, sex, disability or national origin.
SECTION XV - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
A. ARCHITECT is an independent ARCHITECT under this Agreement. Services provided by ARCHITECT
pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the supervision of ARCHITECT. In providing such
services, neither ARCHITECT nor its agents shall act as officers, employees, or agents of the COUNTY.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-R0Q
Architectural Services On-Call Page 13

This Agreement shall not constitute or make the parties a partnership or joint venture. The COUNTY is
not responsible for any debt, default, act or omission of the ARCHITECT.
SECTION XVI - CONFLICTS
A. Neither ARCHITECT nor its employees shall have or hold any continuing or frequently recurring
employment or contractual relationship that is substantially antagonistic or incompatible with
ARCHITECT's loyal and conscientious exercise of judgment related to its performance under this
Agreement.
B. ARCHITECT agrees that none of its officers or employees shall, during the term of this Agreement, serve
as an expert witness against COUNTY in any legal or administrative proceeding in which he or she is not a
party, unless compelled by court process. Further, ARCHITECT agrees that such persons shall not give
sworn testimony or issue a report or writing, as an expression of his or her expert opinion, which is adverse
or prejudicial to the interests of COUNTY in connection with any such pending or threatened legal or
administrative proceeding. The limitations of this section shall not preclude ARCHITECT or any other
persons from representing themselves in any action or in any administrative or legal proceeding.
C. In the event ARCHITECT is permitted to utilize sub-consultants to perform any services required by this
Agreement, ARCHITECT agrees to prohibit such sub-consultants, by written contract, from having any
conflicts within the meaning of this section.
SECTION XVII - CONTINGENCY FEE
A. ARCHITECT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for ARCHITECT, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or
agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee
working solely for ARCHITECT, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent
upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For a breach or violation of this provision,
COUNTY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability at its discretion, or to deduct
from the agreement price or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift or
consideration.
SECTION XVIII - MATERIALITY AND WAIVER OF BREACH
A. COUNTY AND ARCHITECT agree that each requirement, duty, and obligation set forth herein is
substantial and important to the foimation of this Agreement and, therefore, is a material term hereof.
B. COUNTY'S failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such
provision or modification of this Agreement. A waiver of any breach of a provision of this Agreement
shall not be deem a waiver of any subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the
terms of this Agreement.
SECTION XIX - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
A. ARCHITECT shall comply with all federal state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, rules, and regulations
in performing its duties, responsibilities, and obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
SECTION XX - SEVERANCE
A. In the event a portion of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the
remaining provisions shall continue to be effective unless COUNTY or ARCHITECT elects to terminate
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 14

this Agreement. An election to terminate this Agreement based upon this provision shall be made within
seven (7) days after the finding by the court becomes final.
SECTION XXI - JOINT PREPARATION
A. The parties acknowledge that they have sought and received whatever competent advice and counsel as
was necessary for them to form a full and complete understanding of all rights and obligations herein and
that the preparation of this Agreement has been their joint effort. The language agreed to expresses their
mutual intent and the resulting document shall not, solely as a matter of judicial construction, be construed
more severely against one of the parties than the other.
SECTION XXII - PRIORITY OF PROVISIONS
A. If there is a conflict or inconsistency between any teim, statement, requirement, or provision of any exhibit
attached hereto, any document or events referred to herein, or any document incorporated into this
Agreement by reference and a telin, statement, requirement, or provision of this Agreement, the term,
statement, requirement, or provision contained in this Agreement shall prevail and be given effect.
SECTION XXIII - APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE
A. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the
State of Arizona. Venue for litigation or any proceedings concerning this Agreement shall be in Maricopa
County, Arizona.
SECTION XXIV - AMENDMENTS
A. No modification, amendment, or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective
unless contained in a written document prepared with the same or similar founality as this Agreement and
executed by the COUNTY and ARCHITECT.
B. All amendments to this Contract shall be in writing and approved/signed by both parties. Maricopa County
Office of Procurement Services shall be responsible for approving all amendments for Maricopa County
SECTION XXV - PRIOR AGREEMENTS
A. This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations,
agreements, and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree that there
are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that
are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof
shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further
agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be
effective unless set forth in writing in accordance with Section XXIV above.
SECTION XXVI - DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
A. It is a requirement of COUNTY that it enter into contracts only with firms that certify the establishment of
a drug free work place. Execution of this Agreement by ARCHITECT shall serve, as ARCHITECT's
required certification that it either has or that it will establish a drug free work place.
SECTION XXVII - INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
A. The truth and accuracy of each "Whereas" clause set forth herein is acknowledged by the parties. The
attached Exhibits are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement.
SECTION XXVIII - LEGAL WORKER REQUIREMENTS
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 15

A. As required by Arizona Revised Statutes §41-4401, the COUNTY is prohibited after September 30, 2008
from awarding a contract to any service or construction ARCHITECT who fails, or whose sub-contractors
fail, to comply with Arizona Revised Statutes § 23-214-A. The ARCHITECT warrants that it complies
fully with all federal immigration laws and regulations that relate to its employees, that it shall verify,
through the employment verification pilot program as jointly administered by the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration or any of its successor programs, the
employment eligibility of each employee hired after December 31, 2007, and that it shall require its sub-
contractors and sub-sub-contractors to provide the same warranties to the ARCHITECT. The
ARCHITECT acknowledges that a breach of this warranty by ARCHITECT or by any sub-contractor or
sub-sub-contractor under this Contract shall be deemed a material breach of this Contract, and is grounds
for penalties, including termination of this Contract, by Maricopa County. Maricopa County retains the
right to inspect the records of any ARCHITECT, sub-contractor and sub-sub-contractor employee who
performs work under this Contract, and to conduct random verification of the employment records of the
ARCHITECT and any sub-contractor and sub-sub-contractor who works on this Contract, to ensure that
the ARCHITECT and each sub-contractor and sub-sub-contractor is complying with the warranties set
forth above. ARCHITECT shall be responsible for all costs associated with compliance with this
requirement.
SECTION XXIX — ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A — Project Services
Exhibit B — Hourly Rates
Exhibit C — SBE Reporting Form
Exhibit D — Legal Worker Statement (from Statement of Qualifications)
Exhibit E — Alternative Dispute Resolution
Exhibit F — Record Drawing Procedures
SECTION XXX - NOTICES
Notices: All notice to be given hereunder shall be in writing, and may be given by depositing the same
in the United States mail addressed to the party to be notified, postpaid, return receipt requested or by
delivering the same n person to such party with written receipt of acknowledgement of delivery by a
person at the address(s) set forth below. All notices to be given to the parties hereto shall be sent to or
made to the addresses shown below. The place for giving notice shall remain the same as set forth
herein unless changed in the manner provided in this Section.
Whenever either party desires to give notice to the other, such notice must be in writing, sent by
certified United States mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or by hand-delivery with a
request for a written receipt of acknowledgment of delivery, addressed to the party for whom it is
intended at the place last specified. The place for giving notice shall remain the same as set forth
herein until changed in writing in the manner provided in this Section. For the present, the parties
designate the following:
Rich Wegele, Director
Maricopa County Facilities Management Department
401 West Jefferson Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
AND
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 16

Kevin Tyne, Chief Procurement Officer
Office of Procurement Services
Maricopa County
320 W. Lincoln Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
AND TO DESIGN'PROFtS'gIONAL-:
Michael Quinn, Principal
Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC
5240 North 16th Street, Suite 101
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
SECTION XXXI - CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION
A. Notice Prior to Execution of Work. If the ARCHITECT wishes to make Claim for any increase in the
Project Cost, written notice must be given before proceeding to execute the Work. Prior notice is not
required for Claims relating to an emergency endangered life or property. If the ARCHITECT _
believes additional cost is involved for reasons including but not limited to (1) a written interpretation
from the design, an order by the OWNER to stop the Work where the ARCHITECT was not at fault,
(2) other reasonable grounds, a Claim shall be filed in accordance with this Section.
B. Fourteen Days after Occurrence. If the ARCHITECT wishes to make a Claim for an increase in the
Project Cost, the ARCHITECT shall give the OWNER written notice thereof within fourteen (14) days
after the occurrence of the event giving rise to such Claim or within fourteen (14) days after the
ARCHITECT should have recognized, in the exercise of due diligence, the condition giving rise to
such Claim. The ARCHITECT shall provide such notice before proceeding to perform the Work.
Any Claim with respect to an emergency shall be made not later than five (5) days after occurrence of
the emergency as to which the Work was performed.
C. Waiver of Claim for Additional Cost. Failure to give notice of a Claim for an increase Project Cost in
strict compliance with the requirements of this Section shall constitute a waiver of such Claim.
D. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided elsewhere in the Contract, the alternative dispute
resolution ("ADR") process provided for in as Exhibit E (attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference) shall be the exclusive means for resolution of claims or disputes arising under this
Contract.
SECTION XXXII - CONTRACT EXECUTION
This Agreement shall be in full force and effect only when the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County,
Arizona has approved it, and when executed by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and date first above
written, in counterparts, each of which shall without proof or accounting for the other counterparts, be deemed
an original Contract.
SECTION VOCIII — ISRAEL BOYCOTT
By submitting this proposal the Contractor certifies that they are in compliance with Article 9, Arizona
Revised Statutes Section 35-393 ET. seq.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 17

Architectural Services On-Call
180007-ROQ
Date
lCA4 It7.3) part4-
Printed Name Federal Tax Identification Number
A Lc Tt2A4c.A
Title Arizona Contractors License Number
IA-Or 'bet-6C 90607
Vendor Terms NIGP Commodity Code (Advantage)
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA
RECOMMENDED BY: ACCEPTED AND APPROVED:
Department Head Date Chaim an, Board of Supervisors Date
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board Date
LEGAL REVIEW:
Approved as to form and within the powers
And authority granted under the laws of the
State of Arizona to Maricopa County.
By:
Deputy County Attorney
Date:
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 18

EXHIBIT A - PROJECT SERVICES
Facilities Management Department
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
Three (3) Year TERM
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT
SERIAL # 180007-ROQ
CONTRACT NO.: I 80007-ROQ
I - GENERAL
A. This exhibit lists the range of requirements, which may become part of any PROJECT for which the
ARCHITECT provides professional services. The actual service requirements will vary with each
PROJECT. The ARCHITECT and COUNTY will meet and review the scope of work for each PROJECT
completed under terms of this contract and the COUNTY will identify which services it requires of the
ARCHITECT. Based upon the scope of work and the required services the ARCHITECT shall prepare his
proposal, which shall include a design phase schedule. That schedule shall include appropriate time for:
design by phases; owner and stakeholder review and responses thereto and permitting. That schedule will
then be updated and delivered electronically every two (2) weeks.
B. All services listed herein may not be required for a project completed by the ARCHITECT. The
COUNTY reserves the right to request additional services not listed here from the ARCHITECT if
required to complete the work, and to direct that any listed services not be perfoimed.
C. ARCHITECT shall send documents that are to be delivered to the COUNTY to the COUNTY's contract
vendor for printing, unless otherwise approved in writing by the COUNTY. The COUNTY will be billed
directly for these printing costs.
II- PRE-DESIGN SERVICES PHASE
A. The ARCHITECT shall, if requested by the Owner, work with the Owner to develop a scope of work,
phases, schedule and budget for a specific project. These services may include programming, space
schematics and flow diagrams, survey of existing facilities, marketing studies, economic feasibility studies,
project financing studies, etc. The Architect shall incorporate COUNTY space and graphic standards, and
shall develop a program for a specific project.
B. After completion of the pre-design services, the ARCHITECT shall present these documents to the
COUNTY for review, comments, and approval. The COUNTY shall have the right to make changes on
review at no cost to the COUNTY as long as the original PROJECT scope is not materially affected.
C. The ARCHITECT shall present, at the request of the COUNTY, the pre-design documents to the Maricopa
County Facilities Management Department.
III - SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE
A. The ARCHITECT shall provide a preliminary evaluation of the program requirements and the PROJECT
budget constraints, each in terms of the other, then review with the COUNTY any inconsistencies evident
between these program requirements and the budgetary limitations.
B. Based upon the mutually agreed PROJECT program and budget requirements, the ARCHITECT shall
prepare, if requested by the Owner, schematic design studies leading to the recommended design concept
together with a general description of the PROJECT in terms of its scale and interrelationship of parts. The
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 19

ARCHITECT shall submit four (4) sets of prints and an electronic copy of these documents to the
COUNTY. Upon request the ARCHITECT shall provide the COUNTY, one (1) set of schematic design
documents as revised by the ARCHITECT to incorporate COUNTY requested changes at the end of this
design phase. The schematic design documents will be in a PDF format acceptable to the COUNTY.
C. After completion of the schematic design studies the ARCHITECT shall present these studies to the
COUNTY for review, comment, and approval. The COUNTY shall have the right to make changes on
review at no cost to the COUNTY as long as the original PROJECT scope is not materially affected.
D. The ARCHITECT shall present, at the request of the COUNTY, the schematic design to the Maricopa
County Facilities Management Depai Latent.
IV - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE
A. After the schematic design studies are approved by the COUNTY and the ARCHITECT is so advised in
writing by the COUNTY, the ARCHITECT shall prepare from the approved schematic design studies the
design development documents and other criteria as may be appropriate.
B. The ARCHITECT shall design the PROJECT so that the construction will conform to the requirements of
Title 34, Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) regulating Public Buildings and Improvements as well as other
applicable laws, codes, and regulations.
C. The ARCHITECT shall submit to the COUNTY the design development drawings and specifications as
deliverables. The design development deliverables shall include a detailed construction estimate.
D. After completion of the design development phase, the ARCHITECT shall deliver four (4) sets of Design
Development documents and outline specifications to the COUNTY for review, comment, and approval.
The Design Development Documents will be in a PDF format acceptable to the COUNTY. The COUNTY
shall have the right to make changes at no additional cost provided that the previously approved design
development phase concept is not materially affected by these changes. Upon request, the ARCHITECT
shall provide the COUNTY, one (1) set of design development documents as revised by the ARCHITECT
to incorporate COUNTY requested changes at the end of this design phase.
V - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE
A. After the updated design development documents and construction cost estimates have been approved by
the COUNTY and the ARCHITECT has been so advised in writing by the COUNTY, the ARCHITECT
shall prepare, from the approved design development documents, the 50% construction drawings, plans,
and specifications setting forth in detail the work required.
B. The ARCHITECT and his consultants shall prepare all drawings for the PROJECT utilizing
drafting/design software that are capable of producing final Record Documents in AutoCAD. The
drawings shall conform to the guidelines and criteria identified in Exhibit F established by the COUNTY.
Project Specifications shall be prepared utilizing Microsoft Word. When requested by the COUNTY, the
ARCHITECT shall deliver four (4) sets of 50% complete Construction Documents and project
Specifications for review and comment by the COUNTY. The 50% Construction Documents shall be in
a PDF founat acceptable to the COUNTY.
C. The ARCHITECT shall prepare his drawings according to generally accepted practices and, COUNTY
standards. The ARCHITECT shall include the General Conditions as provided by the COUNTY within
the Technical Specifications provided for the specific project. The ARCHITECT shall also complete and
include the General Requirements as provided by the COUNTY within the Technical Specifications
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 20

provided for the specific project, making all revisions necessary to meet the specific requirements for each
project.
D. The ARCHITECT shall provide an updated, detailed construction cost estimate. If the construction
estimate is not within the County's approved construction budget for the project, it will be incumbent on
the Architect to revise the design to bring the construction estimate within the approved construction
budget at no additional cost to the Owner.
E. After the 50% Construction Documents and the updated construction cost estimates have been approved
by the COUNTY and the ARCHITECT has been so advised in writing by the COUNTY, the
ARCHITECT shall prepare from the approved 50% Construction Documents, the Final Construction
Documents, and Specifications, including the Final General Conditions and General Requirements setting
forth in detail the work required.
F. After completion of the Final Construction Documents and Specifications the ARCHITECT shall submit
the Final Construction documents to secure approval of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction
over the design of the PROJECT. All filing and plans approval fees shall be paid directly by the
COUNTY. The ARCHITECT shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, and
regulations in effect at the time the construction contract documents (plans and specifications) are
submitted for regulatory approval. The ARCHITECT shall be responsible for all review comments and
corrections as required to comply with applicable laws, codes, and regulations at no additional cost to the
COUNTY.
G. The ARCHITECT shall submit two (2) sets of final design calculations, including structural, mechanical,
electrical, and plumbing, and four (4) sets of "Construction Documents" including Project Specifications
for review and approval to the COUNTY. The time required by the ARCHITECT to make corrections to
the plans requested by the COUNTY or required by regulatory agencies is considered part of his total
contract time.
VI- QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
A. The COUNTY shall review ARCHITECT'S preparation of plans and specifications at the conclusion of
each of the design phases. The ARCHITECT shall provide such information as the COUNTY may require
regarding the ARCHITECT's design and selection of materials and equipment. ARCHITECT shall
provide, at the COUNTY'S request, such data and information as COUNTY may require regarding
ARCHITECT'S construction estimate for the PROJECT.
B. The COUNTY will review a Constructability and Value Engineering report prepared by the ARCHITECT
at the completion of Design Development and 50% of Construction Documents phases.
C. The ARCHITECT shall verify they have a Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan in place to be executed
through all phases of PROJECT work. The ARCHITECT shall be solely responsible for carrying out the
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan for the PROJECT, the objective of which shall be to prevent
errors and omissions in the plans and specifications and other documents prepared by the ARCHITECT.
The COUNTY will monitor the ARCHITECT's implementation of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Plan, but the COUNTY will not be responsible for the ARCHITECT's failure to carry out the Quality
Assurance/Quality Control Plan nor for the accuracy and quality of the ARCHITECT's services. The
ARCHITECT shall maintain all quality control records for a minimum of five (5) years following the date
of substantial completion of the PROJECT. The COUNTY's rights to examine such records shall not be
construed to confer upon COUNTY a duty to check or examine such records, as the Quality
Assurance/Quality Control Plan and its documentation is the sole responsibility of the ARCHITECT.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL, NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 21

D. Failure by the ARCHITECT or his consultants to incorporate COUNTY or regulatory agency comments
into his plans shall constitute an error or omission on the part of the ARCHITECT and the cost of any
necessary corrective action is to be borne by ARCHITECT.
VII- BIDDING PHASE
A. Upon approval of the final "Construction Documents", including drawings, specifications, and other
contract documents, and upon issuance of a call for construction bids, the ARCHITECT shall send
documents to COUNTY's contract vendor. The COUNTY's contract vendor shall be responsible for
printing and distribution of bid sets to contractors and bidding services. At the option of the COUNTY,
the ARCHITECT may be responsible for the distribution of sets of bidding documents and shall collect a
deposit prior to release of any set, conditional upon the return of the bidding documents in reusable
condition. The Architect shall also send the final "Construction Documents", including drawings,
specifications, and other contract documents in an electronic format approved by the Owner to the
Maricopa County Procurement Department for bidding purposes.
B. The ARCHITECT shall review all submittals from contractors or suppliers for requested substitutions. The
ARCHITECT shall review all drawings, samples and various other submittals to determine compliance
with the PROJECT plans and specifications. If the ARCHITECT determines that a substitution meets the
specifications, the ARCHITECT shall forward the request to the COUNTY with his recommendations.
The ARCHITECT shall then publish in an addendum, a listing all prior approval substitutions approved by
both the ARCHITECT and COUNTY not less than seven (7) days prior to the opening of bids. Failure by
the ARCHITECT or his consultants to incorporate COUNTY comments, adequately evaluate substitutions
and issue the addenda according to statutory requirements shall constitute an error or omission on the part
of the ARCHITECT and the cost of any necessary corrective action is to be borne by ARCHITECT.
C. The ARCHITECT shall prepare and distribute addenda as required.
D. The ARCHITECT shall attend the pre-bid meeting to discuss the PROJECT scope of work, the contract
documents, including any addenda. The Architect shall prepare additional addenda to clarify any bidding
contractor questions about the PROJECT.
E. OVERBUDGET BIDS - In the event a PROJECT is bid and the lowest responsible bid is more than 10%
over the ARCHITECT's estimate, the COUNTY may reject all bids or appropriate such additional moneys
as are necessary to award the bid. In the event the COUNTY elects to reject all bids, the COUNTY shall
direct the ARCHITECT to redesign the PROJECT and re-bid the project, without additional fee.
VIII- CONSTRUCTION PHASE
A. The ARCHITECT shall attend the contractor's pre-construction meeting with the successful bidder. The
ARCHITECT shall record the pre-construction meeting and forward a written record of the meeting
minutes to the COUNTY within three (3) working days.
B. The ARCHITECT shall have access to the work on the PROJECT in normal business hours after proper
notice to the Contractor whenever the work is in preparation or progress. At all times, proper safety
precautions shall be taken by the ARCHITECT.
C. The ARCHITECT shall review and make recommendations to the COUNTY on all claims made by the
Contractor and on all other matters relating to the execution and progress of the work and regarding the
interpretation of the construction contract documents.
TERM - ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 22

D. The ARCHITECT shall timely review all shop drawings, samples and various other submittals to
determine compliance with the PROJECT plans and specifications. If the ARCHITECT determines that a
substitution is required, the ARCHITECT shall forward the request to the COUNTY with his
recommendations. The ARCHITECT shall advise the COUNTY upon the rejection of any submittal item
and provide to the COUNTY an analysis that reflects the effect of such rejection upon the project's critical
path and project execution. As to submittals, ARCHITECT will review submittals for items specifically
mentioned in the Specifications. Responses to submittals shall be made within fourteen (14) days after
submittals are received.
E. The ARCHITECT shall prepare Proposal Requests (PR) and shall forward the proposal, together with the
reason and justification for the change, to the Owner. The Architect shall not send PR directly to the
contractor.
F. The ARCHITECT shall review Change Order requests (if requested by the Owner) and shall forward the
proposed Change Order, together with his final recommendations to the COUNTY.
G. The ARCHITECT shall respond to requests for information and shall issue such Architect's Supplemental
Instructions, AIA. Document G710, as are required for the clarification of the construction contract
documents and to expedite construction of the PROJECT. ALL SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS
MUST HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY. RFI' s shall be submitted to the ARCHITECT, with
a copy to the COUNTY, on a faun that is acceptable to the COUNTY. RFI'S shall be in numerical order,
with no breaks in consecutive numbering. Each page of any attachments to an RFI shall bear the RFI
number. All RFI's should be submitted by e-mail RFI's shall not be utilized to approve submittals or
substitutions nor to request Task Order Modifications or Change Orders. RFI's shall be responded to
within seven (7) days of being received, referencing the RFI number.
H. The ARCHITECT of record and their Consultants shall make periodic site visits for the purpose of
determining general compliance with the approved PROJECT plans and specifications.
1. The frequency of these periodic visits shall be determined by the particular work being performed and
their relationship to critical events including but not limited to: major system start-up's and training.
2. All site visits shall be conducted by the appropriate professional discipline for the work in progress.
3. All visits shall be documented by dated reports on the Architect's Field Report, AIA Document G711.
Problems requiring action by the ARCHITECT or its consultants shall also be recorded, dated, and
appended to the Field Report. Copies shall be forwarded to the COUNTY weekly.
4. It is considered important that the quality of work to be later concealed be observed and documented
on a regular basis. Any deviations from the approved PROJECT plans and specifications shall be
brought to the attention of the Contractor and the COUNTY.
5. The ARCHITECT shall review the plans maintained at the site by the Contractor for notation of
"as-built" construction and report to the COUNTY on the progress of the Contractor's change notation
work monthly in writing prior to each contractor request for payment.
6. The ARCHITECT shall review the contractors shop drawing log, the progress of submittals and the
completeness and accuracy of his as-built noted plans.
I. The ARCHITECT shall review all Contractor payment requests and receipts for stored materials and
certify that to the best of his knowledge, infounation, and belief, based on what his observations have
revealed, the quality and quantity of the work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. As part of
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 23

each payment application review, the ARCHITECT shall review the as-built drawings to confirm in
writing to the Owner they are current.
J. The ARCHITECT and OWNER shall review materials testing reports required by the construction
documents prior to filing The ARCHITECT shall review with the COUNTY and direct corrective work in
all instances where these reports indicate materials failure to meet specifications.
K. The ARCHITECT shall prepare Certificates of Substantial Completion and Final Completion when
appropriate. The ARCHITECT shall conduct inspections and, subject to the COUNTY approval,
determine the Date of Substantial Completion and Final Completion and enter such date on the Certificate.
L. The ARCHITECT will create the punch list upon Substantial Completion and review the performances of
the items to assure their having been completed.
IX - ARCHITECTS REQUIRED ADDITIONAL SERVICES
A. The following items represent additional services of the ARCHITECT that may be required on a
PROJECT. Upon the request by the COUNTY, the ARCHITECT shall submit costs for requested
additional services. The ARCHITECT is not to proceed with any additional services without written
approval from the COUNTY.
B. Upon request of the COUNTY, the ARCHITECT shall maintain a competent full-time person at the
Project Site to monitor job progress and for confoimance of materials and construction with the Contract
Documents for this new facility. The ARCHITECT's full-time representative shall be an experienced
Arizona Registered ARCHITECT suitable to the COUNTY who shall be present at the Project Site a
minimum of forty (40) hours per week and when any work by the contractor or his subcontractors is being
performed except for Arizona State authorized holiday periods. The ARCHITECT's office staff as
required shall support this resident observer.
1. A resume of this full-time representative shall be furnished to the COUNTY for review and approval.
This observer shall attend all progress meetings at which the COUNTY, ARCHITECT, General
Contractor, and Subcontractors can discuss jointly job procedures, progress, problems, and scheduling.
2. The observer shall maintain at the Project Site, on a current basis, contract records, supplemental
instructions, records of all necessary contract, approved drawings and specifications, samples,
materials maintenance and operating manuals and instructions, and other construction related
documents, including all revisions thereto. He shall obtain from the Contractor a current set of record
drawings, specifications and operating manuals at the completion of the PROJECT. The ARCHITECT
shall see that all record items are delivered to the COUNTY.
3. The observer will issue weekly field reports, electronically submitted to the COUNTY.
4. The period of service for the observer shall be based on an established construction period of time.
Should it appear that construction work would carry beyond the contracted period of service, an
additional service must be authorized by the COUNTY in writing to extend observer's services.
5. The ARCHITECT shall be responsible for the timely completion of these items so as not to delay his
work under this Agreement.
X - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL(s)
TERM - ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 24

A. Upon request of the COUNTY, as a condition for Substantial Completion, the ARCHITECT shall review
and approve comprehensive Operation and Maintenance Manuals and Warranties for the PROJECT.
B. The ARCHITECT shall be responsible for the timely completion of these items so as not to delay his work
under this Agreement.
C. The Contractor shall coordinate and conduct all required, training sessions as required by the COUNTY to
fully explain and understand the safe operation and maintenance of the system. The ARCHITECT shall
ensure the proper inclusion and coordination by the Contractor of all required factory training aids and
sessions, written guarantees, bonds, warranties, parts lists, spare parts, extra materials, replacement
materials, operating manuals, and maintenance manuals, and all operating and maintenance audio and
visual instructional and training materials shall be delivered to the COUNTY. All training sessions shall
be recorded by the ARCHITECT on a media approved by the COUNTY.
D. POST-CONSTRUCTION WARRANTY - Upon request of the COUNTY, the ARCHITECT shall assist
the COUNTY in conducting a post-construction inspection at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration
of the (1) one-year post-construction warranty period as required in the ARCHITECT prepared Contract
Documents, making diligent efforts to identify all deficiencies and warranty-related problems and provide
a report on all faults noted and discovered during the inspection to the COUNTY.
E. RECORD DRAWINGS — Upon request of the COUNTY, the ARCHITECT shall prepare record drawings
separately for the PROJECT .Buried underground utilities may be shown as "As-Built" and indicated as
such. The record drawings shall be in AutoCAD and PDF foimats as prescribed in Exhibit F.
F. If requested by the COUNTY, the ARCHITECT shall retain the services of an Arizona registered
professional engineer to prepare the necessary plans and specifications for a fire sprinkler system for the
PROJECT. The design shall include pipe types and sizes, valve types and sizes and all notations necessary
to construct a complete system. The plans will be prepared for the purposes of competitive bidding.
G. When the following services cause the ARCHITECT extra expense and when authorized in writing prior
to perfoimance of such work, these services will be paid for as an "Additional Service."
1. Revising previously approved drawings or specifications to accomplish changes requested by the
COUNTY.
2. Preparing documents for supplemental construction work initiated after commencement of the
construction phase not caused by the errors or omissions of the ARCHITECT.
3. Consultation concerning replacement of any work damaged by fire, flood and other natural causes
during construction and furnishing professional services as may be required in connection with the
replacement of such work.
4. Arranging for the work to proceed should the Contractor default due to delinquency or insolvency
H. The ARCHITECT shall be compensated for additional services, when authorized in writing prior to
performance of such services. Hourly fee compensation on a lump-sum basis shall be in accordance with
Exhibit B— Hourly Rate.
I. It is distinctly understood and agreed that no claims for additional compensation will be allowed by the
COUNTY except as provided herein, nor shall the ARCHITECT perfouu any work or furnish any
materials not covered by this Agreement. Such work or materials furnished by the ARCHITECT without
the written authorization from the Director, of FM]), or his designee, shall be at his own risk, cost and
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 25

expense. The ARCHITECT hereby agrees that without such prior written authorization, he will make no
claim for compensation for such work or materials furnished.
J. Failure to perform any part of the additional services identified within this section shall constitute a
violation of this contract. In the event of such failure, the COUNTY reserves the right to contract with
others to have these services completed and the full amount for such a contract as well as such reasonable
costs incurred by the COUNTY to obtain that contract shall be borne by the ARCHITECT. This cost shall
be deducted from fees due the ARCHITECT.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 26

EXHIBIT B - HOURLY RATES
Facilities Management Department
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
Three (3) Year Term
ARCHITECTURAL Services/On-Call
SERIAL # 180007-ROQ
CONTRACT NO. 180007-ROQ
COMPANY NAME: Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC.
(The following is the format for the fees schedule. Please add/delete applicable job classifications as may be
applicable to on-call/as required project work assignments).
DIRECT LABOR BILLING
STAFF CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE HOURLY RATE
Principal 79.22 192.00
Project Manager 75.77 183.00
Project Architect 60.51 146.00
Specifiation Writer 50.35 122.00
Architect 50.28 122.00
Project Coordinator 46.22 112.00
BIM Modeler 36.67 89.00
Adminstrative 32.22 78.00
Multiplier: 2.42 120 % Overhead
10 %Profit
RATE CALCULATION
[(Direct Labor Hourly Rate x 0/H Rate) + Direct Labor Hourly Rate] x Profit % = Billing Hourly Rate
Example: On a $71.94 Direct labor houlty rate with an 0/H percentage of 138.64% and a 10% profit.
($71.94*1.3864)=99.74
$71.94 + 99.74 = $171.68
$171.68* 1.10% (profit) -$188.85 (Billing Hourly Rate)
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectrual Sercices/On-Call

EXHIBIT C - MARICOPA COUNTY SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
PROGRAM PARTICIPATION REPORTING FORM
This form is to be submitted with each pay application or invoice. Any pay application or invoice without this form attached is subject
to rejection as not being a completed pay application or invoice pursuant to the terms of the contract.
Name of Prime Consultant/Contractor Contract No.
Contact Person Project No.
Street Address Amount of this Pay Application/Invoice
City, State ZIP
Complete below with information on the SBE firms utilized as sub-consultants/subcontractors for this pay application/invoice. If work
was self-performed and your firm, as the prime, is an SBE firm pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1001, et seq., then you may list your firm as the
SBE firm.
SBE Finn Name SBE Firm Address Type of Work Performed $ Pd to SBE this App/Inv
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0 A mark in this box certifies that no SBE firms were utilized as the prime, sub-consultant or subcontractor with respect
to this pay application/invoice.
Date:
Phone No.:
Printed Name
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 28

EXHIBIT D - LEGAL WORKER CERTIFICATION
(NOTE: Please complete this form again if requested by the contracting officer)
/12/23/74V-7
(Date)
Maricopa County
Office of Procurement Services - Article 5
320 W. Lincoln Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
As required by Arizona Revised Statutes §41-4401, Maricopa County (the "County") is prohibited, after
September 30, 2008 from awarding a contract to any contractor who fails, or whose subcontractors fail, to
comply with Arizona Revised Statutes § 23-214-A. The undersigned entity warrants that it complies fully with
all federal immigration laws and regulations that relate to its employees, that it shall verify, through the
employment verification pilot program as jointly administered by the U.S. Depaament of Homeland Security
and the Social Security Administration or any of its successor programs, the employment eligibility of each
employee hired after December 31, 2007, and that it shall require its subcontractors and sub-subcontractors to
provide the same warranties to the below entity.
The undersigned acknowledges that a breach of this warranty by the below entity or by any subcontractor or
sub-subcontractor under any Contract resulting from this solicitation shall be deemed a material breach of the
Contract, and is grounds for penalties, including termination of the Contract, by the County. The County
retains the right to inspect the records of the below entity, subcontractor and sub-subcontractor employee who
performs work under the Contract, and to conduct random verification of the employment records of the below
entity and any subcontractor and sub-subcontractor who works on the Contract, to ensure that the below entity
and each subcontractor and sub-subcontractor is complying with the warranties set forth above.
IP-1+4,4:4 A.Ve S?-ttl' 13 401-1,4_ .V-rieef
(Firm) (Address Line 1)
1,A,Itis.i b. QotA, /D IThat,,-;y, gyzwe,
(Print Name) (Address Line 2)
OOC12- (/3 73
(Print Tit (Phone)
- /i/b
(Signatteyequired) ' (Fax)
111 I11 VA-t.-h-r•- VA-a-h-ft- ' 44-4-/- • 6-01.1-1 z 4- 6 77°1
(Erntil Address) (Federal Taxpayer ID Number)
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 29

EXHIBIT E - ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.1 Scope. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided elsewhere in the Contract, the alternative
dispute resolution ("ADR") process provided herein shall be the exclusive means for resolution of
claims or disputes arising under or related to the Contract, the interpretation thereof or the performance
or breach by any party thereto, including but not limited to original claims or disputes asserted &',oross
claims, counterclaims, third party claims or claims for indemnity or subrogation, in any threatened or
ongoing litigation or arbitration with third parties, if such disputes involve parties to contracts
containing this ADR provision. No changes can be made to this process without the mutual assent of
the County and the claimant. The parties have structured this procedure with the goal of providing for
the prompt, efficient and final resolution of all disputes falling within the purview of this ADR
process.
1.2 Meeting of Principals. When a claim is made or a dispute (hereafter "dispute") as described in
Paragraph 1.1 arises, senior representatives of the County and the claimant will meet personally within
ten (10) business days to discuss the dispute and attempt to resolve it. If, after good faith efforts,
resolution is not achieved, the dispute will proceed to mediation.
1.3 Qualifications of Mediator and Arbitrators. Any person selected as mediator or arbitrator, either as
single arbitrator as a member or Chair of the arbitration panel, shall be a member of the State Bar of
Arizona and have experience in construction law.
1.4 Mediation. If the parties have been unable to resolve the dispute after a meeting of principals, the
parties may enter into mediation. The parties shall jointly select a mediator. The parties may mutually
agree to waive mediation and proceed directly to arbitration. If the mediation process is requested by
either party, the mediation period shall be informal and shall not exceed sixty (60) calendar days from
the selection of the mediator. During the mediation process either party may terminate mediation on
written notice to the other party and the mediator.
1.5 Binding Arbitration Procedure. The following binding arbitration procedure shall serve as the
exclusive method to resolve a dispute if mediation is unsuccessful, if mediation has been waived by
the parties, or if a party requests arbitration during the mediation process. Except as provided in
Section 1.7.5 and 1.7.9, the decision of the arbitrator or arbitrator panel is final and binding on the
parties and riot stitject tO. fttither jutliciafrevietv. : • ,
1.5,.1 - • A party requesting binding arbitration shall notify the other party of their demand for
= A,svriting wiThin s'6\rort ' .(7)calendar days of (1) the failure of .mediation;...4)vvvai47er
of mediation; or (3) of the party's demand to terminate mediation.
,
1.5.2 If the Architect rettnestsYarbitraticitfii. shall post a cash bonclowth• the arbitrator in tan-atnount
agreed upon by the parties or, in the event of no agreement, the arbitrator shall establish the
amount of tlje c* bond to defray the cost of the arbitration and the proceeds from the bond
shall be allocated iñ a tccOrdance with paragraph 1.7.7. The bond must be in the full amount
agreed upon or as established by the Arbitrator to pay the potential cost of the full arbitration
proceeding. The bond must beoosted with and received by the arbitrator within five (5)
calendar days after' the dernand -for arbitration. * s
1.5.3 Disputes involving less than $200,000 shall be heard by one single arbitrator chosen by
agreement of the parties. If the parties cannot agree on the single arbitrator, then the parties
shall each submit two names to a Judge designated by Maricopa County who shall select the
single arbitrator.
TERM - ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 30

1.5.4 For disputes in excess of $200,000, the arbitration panel shall consist of three arbitrators: the
County's appointed arbitrator, the Architect's appointed arbitrator and a third arbitrator who
shall be selected by the parties' arbitrators and serve as the Chair of the arbitration panel.
1.5.5 The arbitration is to be convened and administered under the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act
("RUAA") (A.R.S. § 12-3001 et seq.) and the American Arbitration Association Construction
Rules shall serve as a guideline for proceedings, thus as a supplement to the RUAA.
1.6 Expedited Hearing. Any party can request the single arbitrator or the Chair of the arbitration panel to
set an expedited hearing. If the single arbitrator or the Chair of the arbitration panel determines that the
circumstances justify it, the single arbitrator or the Chair of the arbitration panel will arrange for
scheduling of the arbitration at the earliest possible date. In any event, the hearing of any dispute not
expedited will commence as soon as practical but in no event later than thirty (30) calendar days after
notification of request for arbitration having been received. This deadline can be extended only with
the consent of all the parties to the dispute, or by decision of the single arbitrator or the Chair of the
arbitration panel upon a showing of good cause.
1.7 Procedure. The single arbitrator or the arbitration panel will conduct the hearing in such a manner that
will resolve disputes in a prompt, cost efficient manner giving regard to the rights of all parties. Each
party shall supply to the single arbitrator or arbitration panel a written pre-hearing statement which
shall contain a brief statement of the nature of the claim or defense, a list of witnesses and exhibits, a
brief description of the subject matter of the testimony of each witness who will be called to testify,
and an estimate as to the length of time that will be required for the arbitration hearing. The single
arbitrator or the Chair of the arbitration panel shall determine the nature and scope of discovery, if any,
and the manner of presentation of relevant evidence consistent with deadlines provided herein, and the
parties' objective that disputes be resolved in a prompt and efficient manner No discovery may be
had of any materials or information for which a privilege is recognized by Arizona law. The single
arbitrator or the Chair upon proper application shall issue such orders as may be necessary and
permissible under law to protect confidential, proprietary or sensitive materials or information from
public disclosure or other misuse. Any party may make application to the Maricopa County Superior
Court to have a protective order entered as may be appropriate to confirm or enforce such orders of the
Chair.
1.7.1 Hearing Days. In order to effectuate parties' goals, the hearing once commenced, will proceed
from working day to working day until concluded, absent a showing of good cause.
1.7.2 Award. The single arbitrator shall within ten (10) calendar days of the conclusion of a hearing_
issue an award. The arbitration panel shall, within ten (10) calendar days from the conclusion
of any hearing, by majority vote, issue its award. The award shall include an allocation of fees
and costs pursuant to 1.7.7 herein. The award is to be in accordance with the Contract and the
law of the State of Arizona.
1.7.3 Scope of Award. Regardless of the provisions of the RUAA, the arbitration panel shall be
without authority to award punitive damages, and any such punitive damage award shall be
void. If an award is made against any party in excess of one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000), exclusive of interest, arbitration fees, costs and attorneys' fees, it shall be
supported by written findings of fact, conclusions of law and a statement as to how damages
were calculated.
1.7.4 Jurisdiction. The arbitration panel shall not be bound for jurisdictional purposes by the
amount asserted in any party's claim, but shall conduct a preliminary hearing into the question
of jurisdiction over the claim as regards its amount upon application of any party at the earliest
convenient time, but not later than the commencement of the arbitration hearing. If the dispute
TERM - ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 31

is determined to involve less than $200,000, the arbitration shall continue before the Neutral
Arbitrator as a single arbitrator, with the party appointed arbitrators being excused.
1.7.5 Entry of Judgment. As provided in the RUAA, any party can make application to the
Maricopa County Superior Court for confirmation of an award, and for entry of judgment on
it.
1.7.6 Severance and Joinder. To reduce the possibility of inconsistent adjudications, the Mediator
or the single arbitrator or arbitration panel, may: (i) at the request of any party, join and/or
sever parties, and/or claims arising under other contracts containing this ADR provision, and
(ii) the Mediator, on his own authority, or the single arbitrator or arbitration panel may, on its
own authority, join or sever parties and/or claims subject to this ADR process as deemed
necessary for a just resolution of the dispute, consistent with the parties' goal of the prompt
and efficient resolution of disputes, provided; however, that the A/E, OWNER and Project
Professionals shall not be joined as a party to any claim made by a Architect. Nothing herein
shall create the right by any party to assert claims against another party not arising under or
related to the Contract or not recognized under the substantive law as applicable to the dispute.
Neither the Mediator nor the single arbitrator or arbitration panel is authorized to join to the
proceeding parties not in privity with the County. The Architect cannot be joined to any
pending arbitration proceeding, without Architect's express written consent and unless
Architect is given the opportunity to participate in the selection of the single arbitrator or non-
County appointed arbitrator.
1.7.7 Fees and Costs. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs in connection with any informal
hearing before the mediation. All fees and costs associated with any arbitration before the
single panel or arbitration panel, including without limitation the arbitrator fees, and the
prevailing party's reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees and costs, will be paid by the
non-prevailing party, except as provided for herein. In the event that Architect is the non-
prevailing party, all fees and costs as noted above shall first be paid out of the bond posted
with the arbitrator. In no event shall the Architect's obligation to pay fees and costs be limited
to the amount of the bond posted herein. In no event shall any arbitrator's hourly fees be
awarded in an amount in excess of $250 per hour and (i) costs shall not include any travel
expenses in excess of mileage at the rate paid by Maricopa County, not to exceed a one way
trip of 150 miles, and (ii) all travel expenses, including meals, shall be reimbursed pursuant to
the travel policy of Maricopa County in effect at the time of the hearing. The determination of
prevailing and non-prevailing parties, and the appropriate allocation of fees and costs, will be
included in the award by the single arbitrator or arbitration panel.
1.7.8 Confidentiality. Any proceeding initiated under this ADR provision shall be deemed
confidential to the maximum extent allowed by Arizona law and, except for disclosures to a
party's attorneys or accountants, no party shall make any disclosure related to the disputed
matter or to the outcome of any proceeding except to the extent required by law, or to seek
interim equitable relief, or to enforce an agreement reached by the parties or an award made
hereunder. This provision does not affect the County's right to inform the County Supervisors
of the dispute.
1.7.9 Equitable Litigation. Notwithstanding any other provision of ADR to the contrary, any party
can petition the Maricopa County Superior Court for interim equitable relief as may become
necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent immediate and irreparable harm to a party or
to the Project pending resolution of a dispute pursuant to ADR provided herein. No court may
order any permanent injunctive relief except as may be necessary to enforce an order entered
by the arbitration panel. The fees and costs incurred in connection with any such equitable
proceeding shall be determined and assessed in ADR.
TERM - ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 32

1.7.10 Change Order. Any award in favor of the Architect against the County or in favor of the
County against the Architect shall be reduced to a Change Order and executed by the parties in
accordance with the award and the provisions of the Contract or a settlement agreement as
appropriate.
1.7.11 Merger and Bar. Any claim asserted pursuant to this ADR process shall be deemed to include
all claims, demands, and requests for compensation for costs and losses or other relief,
including the extension of the Contract performance period which reasonably should or could
have been brought against any party that was or could have been brought into this ADR
process, with respect to the subject claim. The arbitration panel shall apply legal principles
commonly known as merger and bar to deny any claim or claims against any party regarding
which claim or claims recovery has been sought or should have been sought in a previously
adjudicated claim for an alleged cost, loss, breach, error, or omission.
1.8 Inclusion in Other Contracts. The Architect shall cooperate with the County in efforts to include this
ADR provision in all other Project contracts.
END OF EXHIBIT
TERM' ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 33

EXHIBIT F RECORD DRAWING PROCEDURES
Introduction
These guidelines are issued to promote the development of electronic drawings suitable for use in the
Maricopa County Facilities Management Department CAD environment. Consistency and compatibility with
existing Maricopa County documents can only be achieved when these standards are strictly adhered to.
Electronic drawings produced and submitted in accordance with these standards have significantly greater
value to Maricopa County. Design Professionals (DP), their Sub-consultants, and Contractors delivering
documentation to Maricopa County must ensure these standards are reviewed, understood and followed by
those people responsible for preparing electronic drawings.
Renovations and Space Change Projects Requirements
For typical Renovation and Space Planning projects, the DP is responsible for submitting a complete set of
Construction Documents (CDs) to Maricopa County prior to the beginning of construction. Upon completion
of construction, Contractors are responsible for submitting complete As-Built documentation (per definitions
included in the Agreement Between The County of Maricopa, Arizona and Design Professional) to the Owner
(in both electronic and hardcopy formats) and DP is responsible for submitting the Record Drawings to the
Owner based on this As-Built documentation. Construction Documents and Record Drawings submitted to the
Owner need to adhere the criteria outlined in this document.
All "DWG" files and AutoCAD drawing entities submitted at the end of a project must be able to be
manipulated using standard AutoCAD drafting procedures. Non-compliance with this policy may result in the
rejection of AutoCAD files submitted at project closeout, in addition to delayed rendering of final project
payment. "DXF" files will not be accepted at project closeout as a substitution for "DWG" AutoCAD file
deliverables. Projects using Building Info 'illation Modeling (BIM) software are still required to submit
"DWG" formats for their projects.
Electronic File Foimat
CAD drawings must be submitted in full compliance with AutoCAD software 2007 drawing file foi flat (file
extension = .DWG).
All Construction and Record Document project drawings must be submitted to Maricopa County Facilities
Management Department in all file foimats listed below; other formats are not acceptable without the prior
consent of Maricopa County Facilities Management Department.
• AutoCAD® 2007 or higher — DWG foimat only.
• Adobe® PDF version 6.0 or higher.
Scale, Units, Coordinate System and Orientation
AutoCAD drawings should be drafted at full scale in architectural or engineering units, such that one drawing
unit equals one inch. The User Coordinate System (UCS) for all AutoCAD drawings should be set to "World".
Tolerances
When projects require creation of new AutoCAD floor plans from field measurements, exterior building
dimensions should reconcile to within one (1) inch of actual building dimensions as measured in the field.
Interior building dimensions must reconcile to within half (1/2) inch of actual field dimensions. However,
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 35

individual project requirements may vary. Please confirm requirements with the Project Manager designated
by Maricopa County.
Blocks
The following rules must be employed when handling block entities:
1. All entities within a block must be created on layer 0.
2. Drawing entities translated into AutoCAD blocks from non-AutoCAD systems must revert to layer
0 when exploded within AutoCAD.
Policy on External Reference Files (XREFs)
Maricopa County will not accept the submission of any AutoCAD drawing deliverable which contains
unbound references to external source drawing files. All externally referenced data sources that were used
during the AutoCAD drawing production phase should be incorporated as a block within a single drawing file,
including the title block and all identifying information visible in the printed image, upon project completion
and prior to submission to Maricopa County. Layers contained in XREF's inserted as blocks should conform
to Maricopa County guidelines. The resulting self-contained drawing file is an acceptable deliverable to
Maricopa County.
Owner Supplied CAD Files
Prior to commencement of design and construction services, Maricopa County will provide past Record
Drawings in AutoCAD per the Contract Agreement that can be used as the background for space
documentation projects. These have been generated using a variety of methods and may require field
verification. When no pre-existing Record Drawings in AutoCAD are available, consultants will be required to
produce drawings entirely from field measurements. AutoCAD files are transmitted for the convenience and
expediency of the DP, their Sub-consultants and the Contractor but bear no implicit or explicit guarantee of
accuracy, reliability or correctness". It is recommended to all recipients of Owner-supplied drawing files to
perform their own verifications as necessary to develop drawings for each phase of the project.
Layers for CAD Files
All AutoCAD Files shall include but not be limited to the following building features that define the physical
boundaries necessary to define space, such as: 1) exterior walls; 2) vertical elevations & sections; 3) details; 4)
schedules; 5) doors; 6) glazing; 7) elevator shafts; 8) stair wells and other changes in floor elevation; 9) built-
in furniture and/or modular systems. The DP, their Sub-consultants and the Contractor shall adhere to these
layer standards as much as possible, although additional layers, confouning to standard formats, may be
necessary, while some layers may not be applicable to every space documentation project (furniture, roof lines,
etc.).
AutoCAD layers should be named in accordance with the latest U.S. National CAD Standard (NCS) which can
be obtained from the National Institute of Building Sciences. Custom layers added by Marieopa County begin
with MC-. The specific name of custom layers may vary slightly by Maricopa County owner.
AIA CAD Layer Guidelines
See U.S. National CAD Standard Version 3 (attached).
USE OF BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM)
Although projects may utilize Building Information Modeling (BIM) for conveying three-dimensional design,
two-dimensional deliverables are still required as outlined in this guideline and as specified in Maricopa
County Agreements with the DP, their Sub-consultants and Contractors.
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 36

BIM Execution Plan
Projects utilizing Brm are required to provide a BIM Execution Plan to document modeling practices. This
document declares what is being modeled, the accuracy of the models, the intent of the models, and how
project teams work within the models.
BI1VI Standards
Modeling practices and standards should be declared and agreed upon in the Project's BIM Execution Plan.
BIM Models and Deliverables
Models turned over to Maricopa County as a deliverable must meet the requirements of the agreed upon BIM
Execution Plan.
Use of Revit
Models are to be created in the most current version of Autodesk Revit. Modeling practices are to be declared
in the project's BIM Execution Plan.
END OF EXHIBIT
TERM ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 180007-ROQ
Architectural Services On-Call Page 37

ARRIN-1 OP ID: TA
DATE (MM/DDITYYY)
4.---- CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
1012312017
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER =TACT ei Sally Perkins
Stuckey Ins & Assoc Agencies PHONE 602-264-5533 FAX 602-279-9336
2850 E Camelback Rd, Suite 325 IAJC, No, E)cti: (A/C, No):
Phoenix, AZ 85016 ADDRESS: E-MAIL sally.perkins @stuckeyinsurance.com
Mary Lodwick
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
INSURER A : Travelers Prop Cas of America 25674
INSURED Arrington Watkins INSURER B: Phoenix Insurance Company 25623
Architects LLC INSURER c : Travelers Casualty & Surety Co 25658
5240 N 16th St #101
Phoenix, AZ 85016 INSURER D :Travelers Casualty & Surety Co 19038
INSURER E:
INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSD SUER WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DDlYYTY) POLICY EFF (MM/DD/TYYY) POLICY EXP LIMITS
A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR X X 6807H121391 02/15/2017 02/15/2018 Rral?ER.E0NcciTurriperice, $ 1,000,000
X Contractual Liab MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000
POLICY X 72-F LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000
OTHER: $
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED (Ea accident) SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000
B X ANY AUTO BA0612M312 02/1512017 02/15/2018 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
AUTOS AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS AUTOS NON-OWNED PROPERTY (Per accident) DAMAGE $
$
X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,000
C EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE CUP8425Y285 02/15/2017 02/15/2018 AGGREGATE $ 5,000,000
DED X RETENTION $ 10000 $
WORKERS COMPENSATION STATUTE PER 0TH- ER
AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY Y / N
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE EL. EACH ACCIDENT $
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N/A
(Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below EL. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $
D Professional Liab 105562110 02/15/2017 02/1512018 Per Claim 2,000,000
Aggregate 4,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)
Professional Liability - Claims Made - Retro Date 09/01/94
Re: P2017.082.01 Maricopa County Architectural Services Contract Term 2018
Contract # 180007-ROQ
Maricopa County is named as additional insured as respects to general
liability. Waiver of subrogation applies as indicated.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
MARIC-5
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
Maricopa County ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
Office of Procurement Services
Facilities Management Dept
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
320 West Lincoln Street
1/4-1110iVv1,0%,(1.-
Phoenix, AZ 85003
@ 1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED
(ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS)
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
1. The following is added to SECTION II — WHO IS h. This insurance does not apply to "bodily
AN INSURED: injury" or "property damage" caused by "your
Any person or organization that you agree in a work" and included in the "products-
"written contract requiring insurance" to include as completed operations hazard" unless the
an additional insuredon this Coverage Part, but: "written contract requiring insurance"
specifically requires you to provide such
a. Only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", coverage for that additional insured, and then
"property damage" or "personal injury"; and the insurance provided to the additional
b. If, and only to the extent that, the injury or insured applies only to such "bodily injury" or
damage is caused by acts or omissions of "property damage" that occurs before the end
you or your subcontractor iri -the performance of the period of time for which the "written
of "your work" to which the "written contract contract requiring insurance" requires you to
requiring insurance" applies, or in connection provide such coverage or the end of the
with premises owned by or rented to you. policy period, whichever is earlier.
The person or organization does not qualify as an 2. The following is added to Paragraph 4.a. of
additional insured: SECTION IV — COMMERCIAL GENERAL
c. With respect to the independent acts or LIABILITY CONDITIONS:
omissions of such person or organization; or The insurance provided to the additional insured
d. For "bodily injury", "property damage" or is excess over any valid and collectible other
insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent or
"personal injury" for which such person or on any other basis, that is available to the
organization has assumed liability in a additional insured fora loss we cover. However, if
contract or agreement. you specifically agree in the "written contract
The insurance provided to such additional insured requiring insurance" that this insurance provided
is limited as follows: to the additionalinsured under this Coverage Part
e. This insurance does not apply on any basis to must apply on a primary basis or a primary and
any person or organization for which non-contributory basis, this insurance is primary
coverage as an additional insured specifically to other, insurance available to the additional
is added by another endorsement to this insured which covers that person or organizations
Coverage Part. as a named insured for such loss, and we will not
share with the other insurance, provided that:
f. This insurance does not apply to the
rendering of or failure to render any (1) The "bodily injury" or "property damage" for
"professional services". which coverage is sought occurs; and
g. In the event that the Limits of Insurance of the (2) The "personal injury" for which coverage is
Coverage Part shown in the Declarations sought arises out of an offense committed;
exceed the limits of liability required by the after you have signed that "written contract
"written contract requiring insurance", the requiring insurance". But this insurance provided
insurance provided to the additional insured to the additional insured still is excess over valid
shall be limited to the limits of liability required and collectible other insurance, whether primary,
by that "written contract requiring insurance". excess, contingent or on any other basis, that is
This endorsement does not increase the available to the additional insured when that
limits of insurance described in Section III — person or organization is an additional insured
Limits Of Insurance. under any other insurance.
CG D3 81 09 15 @ 2015 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2
Includes the copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
3. The following is added to Paragraph 8., Transfer 4. The following definition is added to the
Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us, DEFINITIONS Section:
of SECTION IV — COMMERCIAL GENERAL "Written contract requiring insurance" means that
LIABILITY CONDITIONS: part of any written contract under which you are
We waive any right arrecovery we may have required to include a person or organization as an
again-St any person or organization because of additional insured on this Coverage Part,
payments we make for "bodily injury", "property provided that the "bodily injury" and "property
damage" or "personal injury" arising out of "your damage" occurs and the "personal injury" is
work" performed by you, or on your behalf, done caused by an offense committed:
Under a "written contract requiring insurance" with
that person or organization. We waive this right a. After you have signed that written contract;
only where you have agreed to do so as part of b. While that part of the written contract is in
the "written contract requiring insurance" with effect; and
such person or organization signed by you
before, and in effect when, the "bodily injury" or c. Before the end of the policy period.
"property damage" occurs, or the "personal injury"
offense is committed.
Page 2 of 2 @ 2015 The Travelers Indemnity Company. All rights reserved. CG D3 81 09 15
Includes the copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission

0
DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
ACCoRD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY' INSURANCE
10/23/2017
/----
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Craig Coburn
TAG Insurance Services PHONE Ext): 623-580-4900 FAX (A/C , No): 623-580-4902
20815 N Cave Creek Rd E-MAIL ADDRESS: craig©tagpay.com
Phoenix, AZ 85024 INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
INSURER A: Hartford Insurance Co of the Midwest 37478
INSURED INSURER B :
Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC INSURER C:
5240 N 16th St INSURER 0:
Suite 101 INSURER E :
Phoenix AZ 85016 INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTVVITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
1NSR ADDL SUER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS
LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE 1NSD VVVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)
COMMgRCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $
DAMAGE TO RENTED
CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $
MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GE 'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $
POLICY JECT PRO- LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $
OTHER: $
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $
(Ea accident)
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
ALL OWNED E1 SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
AUTOS AUTOS
NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $
HIRED AUTOS AUTOS (Per accident)
$
UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $
EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $
WORKERS COMPENSATION \d" PER 0TH-
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY I". STATUTE ER
„ ANYPROPRIETORIPARTNER/EXECUTIVE YIN EL. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1000000
/A OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N/A Y 59WECGF0387 06/01/2017 06/01/2018
(Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1000000
If yes, describe under 1000000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below EL. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS! LOCATIONS! VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)
Waiver of subrogation in favor of certificate holder when required by contract.
P2017.082.01 Maricopa County Architectural Services Contract Term 2018
Contract # 180007-ROD
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
Maricopa County THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
Office of Procurement Services
Facilities Management Department
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
320 W. Lincoln Street
Phoenix AZ 85003
@ 1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BROAD FORM [ENDORSEMENT
EXTENDED OPTIONS
Policy Number: 59 WEC GF0387 Endorsement Number:
Effective Date: 06/01/17 Effective hour is the same as stated on the Information Page of the policy.
Named Insured and Address: ARRINGTON WATKINS ARCHITECTS, LLC
5240 N 16TH ST STE 101
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
Section I of this endorsement expands coverage provided under WC 00 00 00.
Section ll of this endorsement provides additional coverage usually only provided by endorsement.
Section III of this endorsement is a Schedule of Covered States.
You may use the index to locate these coverage features quickly:
INDEX
SUBJECT PAGE SUBJECT PAGE
SECTION I 2 B. Part One Does Not Apply 3
PARTS ONE and TWO 2 C. Application of Coverage 3
01 We Will Also Pay 2 D. Additional Exclusions 3
PART - THREE 2 E. West Virginia 3
02 How This Insurance Works 2 EXTENDED OPTIONS 4
PART - SIX 2 01 Employers' Liability Insurance 4
03 Transfer of Your Rights and Duties 2 02 Unintentional' Failure to Disclose 4
04 Cancellation 2 Hazards
05 Liberalization 2 03 Waiver of Our Right to Recover from 4
SECTION II 2 Others
VOLUNTARY COMPENSATION INSURANCE 2 04 Foreign Voluntary Compensation 4
06 Voluntary Compensation Insurance A. How Thii Reimbursement Applies 4
A. How This Insurance Applies 2 B. We Will Reimburse 4
B. We Will Pay 2 C. Exclusions 4
C. Exclusions 3 D. Before We Pay 5
D. Before We Pay 3 E. Recovery From Others 5
E. Recovery From Others 3 F. Reimbursement For Actual Loss 5
F. Employers' Liability Insurance 3 Sustained
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY STOP GAP 3 G. Repatriation 5
ENDORSEMENT 3 H. Endemic Disease 5
07 Employers' Liability Stop Gap 05 Longshore and Harbor Workers' 5
Coverage 3 Compensation Act Coverage
A. Stop Gap Coverage Limited to Endorsement
Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, 3 SECTION III 6
Washington, West Virginia and 01 Schedule of Covered States 6
Wyoming
Form WC 99 03 01 B Printed in U.S.A. (Ed. 8/00) Page 1 of 6
Process Date: 04/16/17 Policy Expiration Date: 06/01/18
© 2000, The Hartford

SECTION I
PARTS ONE and TWO the Information Page, coverage will not be
afforded for that state unless we are notified
1. WE WILL ALSO PAY
within sixty days.
D. We Will Also Pay of Part One (WORKERS'
COMPENSATION INSURANCE); and PART SIX
E. We Will Also Pay of Part Two (EMPLOYERS' 3. Transfer Of Your Rights and Duties
LIABILITY INSURANCE) is replaced by the
following: C. Transfer Of Your Rights and Duties of Part 6
(Conditions) is replaced by the following:
We Will Also Pay
Your rights or duties under this policy may not
We will also pay these costs, in addition to be transferred without our written consent.
other amounts payable under this insurance,
as part of any claim, proceeding, or suit we If you die and we receive notice within sixty
defend: days after your death, we will cover your legal
representative as insured.
1. reasonable expenses incurred at our
request, INCLUDING loss of earnings; 4. Cancellation
2. premiums for bonds to release Paragraph 2. of D. Cancellation of Part 6
attachments and for appeal bonds in bond (Conditions) is replaced by the following:
amounts up to the limit of our liability 2. We may cancel this policy. We must mail or
under this insurance; deliver to you not less than 15 days advance
3. litigation costs taxed against you; written notice stating when the cancellation is
to take effect. Mailing that notice to you at
4. interest on a judgment as required by law your mailing address shown in Item 1 of the
until we offer the amount due under this Information Page will be sufficient to prove
law; and
notice.
5. expenses we incur.
5. Liberalization
PART THREE If we adopt a change in this form that would
broaden the coverage of this form without extra
2. How This Insurance Applies charge, the broader coverage will apply to this
Paragraph 4. of A. How This Insurance Applies policy. It will apply when the change becomes
of Part 3 (Other States Insurance) is replaced by effective in your state.
the following:
4. If you have work on the effective date of this
policy in any state not listed in Item 3.A. of
SECTION II
VOLUNTARY COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' 2. The bodily injury must arise out of and in
LIABILITY COVERAGE the course of employment or incidental to
work in a state shown in Item 3.A. of the
6. Voluntary Compensation Insurance Information Page.
A. How This Insurance Applies 3. The bodily injury must occur in the United
This insurance applies to bodily injury by States of America, its territories or
accident or bodily injury by disease. Bodily possessions, or Canada, and may occur
injury includes resulting death. elsewhere if the employee is a United
I. The bodily injury must be sustained by any States or Canadian citizen, or otherwise
officer or employee not subject to the legal resident, and legally employed, in the
workers' compensation law of any state United States or Canada and temporarily
shown in Item 3.A. of the Information away from those places.
Page.
Form WC 99 03 01 B Printed in U.S.A. (Ed. 8/00) Page 2 of 6

4. Bodily injury by accident must occur keep an amount equal to our expenses of
during the policy period. recovery and the benefits we paid. We will
5. Bodily injury by disease must be caused pay the balance to the persons entitled to it. If
or aggravated by the conditions of the the persons entitled to the benefits of this
officer's or employee's employment. The insurance make a recovery from others, they
officer's or employee's last day of last must reimburse us for the benefits we paid
exposure to the conditions causing or them.
aggravating such bodily injury by disease F. Employers' Liability Insurance
must occur during the policy period. Part Two (Employers' Liability Insurance)
B. We Will Pay applies to bodily injury covered by this
We will pay an amount equal to the benefits endorsement as though the State of
that would be required of you as if you and Employment was shown in Item 3.A. of the
your employees were subject to the workers' Information Page.
compensation law of any state shown in Item This provision 6. does not apply in New Jersey or
3.A. of the Information Page. We will pay Wisconsin.
those amounts to the persons who would be EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY STOP GAP COVERAGE
entitled to them under the law.
7. Employers' Liability Stop Gap Coverage
C. Exclusion
A. This coverage only applies in Montana, North
)is insurance does not cover: Dakota, Ohio, Washington, West Virginia and
1. any obligation imposed by workers' Wyoming,.
compensation or occupational disease law B. Part One (Workers' Compensation Insurance)
or any similar law. does not apply to work in states shown in
2. bodily injury intentionally caused or Paragraph A above.
aggravated by you. C. Part Two (Employers' Liability Insurance)
3. officers or employees who have elected applies in the states, shown in Paragraph A.,
not to be subject to the state workers' as though they were shown in Item 3.A. of the
compensation law. Information Page.
4. partners or sole proprietors not covered D. Part Two, Section C. Exclusions is changed
under the Standard Sole Proprietors, by adding these exclusions.
Partners, Officers and Others Coverage This insurance does not cover;
Endorsement.
5. bodily injury intentionally caused or
D. Before We Pay aggravated by you or in Ohio bodily injury
Before we pay benefits to the persons entitled_ resulting from an act which is determined
to them, they must: by an Ohio court of law to have been
1. Release you and us, in writing, of all committed by you with the belief than an
responsibility for the injury or death. injury is substantially certain to occur.
However, the cost of defending such
2. Transfer to us their right to recover from claims or suits in Ohio is covered.
others who may be responsible for the
injury or death. 13. bodily injury sustained by any member of
the flying crew of any aircraft.
3. Cooperate with us and do everything
necessary to enable us to enforce the right 14. any claim for bodily injury with respect to
to recover from others. whidh you are deprived of any defense or
defenses or are otherwise subject to
If the persons entitled to the benefits of this penalty because of default in premium
insurance fail to do those things, our duty to under the provisions of the workers'
pay ends at once. If they claim damages from compensation law or laws of a state
you or from us for the injury or death, our duty shown in Paragraph A.
to pay ends at once.
E. This insurance applies to damages for which
E. Recovery From Others you are liable under West Virginia Code Annot.
If we make a recovery from others, we will S 23-4-2.
Form WC 99 03 01 B Printed in U.S.A. (Ed. 8/00) Page 3 of 6

EXTENDED OPTIONS
1. Employers' Liability Insurance 4. Foreign Voluntary Compensation and
Item 3.B. of the Information Page is replaced by Employers' Liability Reimbursement
the following: A. How This Reimbursement Applies
B. Employers' Liability Insurance: This reirr1bursement provision applies to bodily
1. Part Two of the policy applies to work in injury by accident or bodily injury by disease.
each state listed in Item 3.A. Bodily injury includes resulting death.
1. The bodily injury must be sustained by an
The Limits of Liability under Part Two are officer or employee.
the higher of: 2. The bodily injury must occur in the course
of employment necessary or incidental to
Bodily Injury work in a country not listed in Exclusion
by Accident $500,000 Each Accident C.1. of this provision.
3. Bodily injury by accident must occur
Bodily Injury during the policy period.
by Disease $500,000 Policy Limit 4. Bodily injury by disease must be caused
or aggravated by the conditions of your
Bodily Injury employment. The officer or employee's
by Disease $500,000 Each Employee last exposure to those conditions of your
employment must occur during the policy
OR period.
B. We Will Reimburse
2. The amount shown in the Information We will reimburse you for all amounts paid by
Page. you whether such amounts are:
This provision 1 of EXTENDED OPTIONS does not 1. voluntary payments for the benefits that
apply in New York because the Limits Of Our would be required of you if you and your
Liability are unlimited. officers or employees were subject to any
In this provision the limits are changed from workers' compensation law of the state of
$500,000 to $1,000,000 in California. hire of the individual employee.
2. Unintentional Failure to Disclose Hazards 2. sums to which Part Two (Employers'
Liability Insurance) would apply if the
If you unintentionally should fail to disclose all Country of Employment were shown in
existing hazards at the inception date of your Item 3.A. of the Information Page,
policy, we shall not deny coverage under this
policy because of such failure. C. Exclusions
3. Waiver of Our Right To Recover From Others '1His insurance does not cover:
A. We have the right to recover our payments 1. any occurrences in the United States,
from anyone liable for an injury covered by this Canada, and any country or jurisdiction
policy. We will not enforce our right against which is the subject of trade or economic
any person or organization for whom you sanctions imposed by the laws or
perform work under a written contract that regulations of the United States of
requires you to obtain this agreement from us. America in effect as of the inception date
of this policy.
This agreement shall not operate directly or
indirectly to benefit anyone not named in the 2. any obligation imposed by a workers'
agreement. compensation or occupational disease
law, or similar law.
B. This provision 3. does not apply in the states
of Pennsylvania and Utah. 3. bodily injury intentionally caused or
aggravated by you.
Form WC 99 03 01 B Printed in U.S.A. (Ed. 8/00) Page 4 of 6

4. liability for any consequence, whether of America necessarily incurred as a direct
direct or indirect, of war, invasion, act of result of bodily injury.
Foreign enemy, hostilities (whether war be Our reimbursement shall be limited as follows:
declared or not), civil war, rebellion,
revolution, insurrection or military or 1. to the amount by which such expenses
usurped power. No endorsement now or exceed the normal cost of returning the
subsequently attached to this policy shall officer or employee if in good health, or
be construed as overriding or waiving this 2. in the event of death, to the amount by
limitation unless specific reference is which such expenses exceed the normal
made thereto. cost of returning the officer or employee if
D. Before We Pay alive and in good health.
Before we reimburse you for the benefits to the In no event shall our reimbursement exceed
persons entitled to them, you must have them: the bodily injury by accident limit shown in
Item 3.a. of the Information Page as respects
1. release you and us, in writing, of all any one such officer or employee whether
responsibility for the injury or death, dead or alive.
2. transfer to us their right to recover from H. Endemic Disease
others who may be responsible for their
injury or death, The word "disease" includes any endemic
diseases.
3. cooperate with us and do everything
necessary to enable us to enforce the right The coverage applies as if endemic diseases
to recover from others. were included in the provisions of the workers'
compensation law.
If the persons entitled to the benefits paid fail
to do these things, our duty to reimburse ends 5. Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation
at once. If they claim damages from us for the Act Coverage
injury or death, our duty to reimburse ends at General Section C. Workers' Compensation
once. Law is replaced by the following:
E. Recovery From Others C. Workers' Compensation Law
If we make a recovery from others, we will Workers' Compensation Law means the
keep an amount equal to our expenses of workers or workers' compensation law and
recovery and the benefits we reimbursed. We occupational disease law of each state or
will pay the balance to the persons entitled to territory named in Item 3.A. of the Information
it. If persons entitled to the benefits make a Page and the Longshore and Harbor Workers'
recovery from others, they must repay us for Compensation Act (33 USC Sections 901-
the amounts that we have reimbursed you. 950). It includes any amendments to those
F. Reimbursement for Actual Loss Sustained laws that are in effect during the policy period.
This endorsement provides only for It does not include any other federal workers
reimbursement for the loss you actually or workers' compensation law, other federal
sustain. In order for you to recover loss or occupational disease law or the provisions of
expenses under this reimbursement you must: any law that provide nonoccupational disability
benefits.
1. actually sustain and pay the loss or
expense in money after trial, or Part Two (Employers' Liability Insurance), C.
Exclusions, exclusion 8, does not apply to
2. secure our consent for the payment of the work subject to the Longshore and Harbor
loss or expense. Workers' Compensation Act.
G. Repatriation This coverage does not apply to work subject
Our reimbursement includes the additional to the Defense Base Act, the Outer
expenses of repatriation to the United States Continental Shelf Lands Act, or the
Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentalities Act.
Form WC 99 03 01 B Printed in U.S.A. (Ed. 8/00) Page 5 of 6

SECTION III
1. SCHEDULE OF COVERED STATES B. If a state, shown in Item 3.A. of the Information
A. This endorsement only applies in the states Page, approves this endorsement after the
listed in this Schedule of Covered States. effective date of this policy, this endorsement
will apply to this policy. The coverage will
apply in the new state on the effective date of
the state approval.
C. Schedule of Covered States:
AZ
Countersigned by
Authorized Representative
Form WC 99 03 01 B Printed in U.S.A. (Ed. 8/00) Page 6 of 6

5240 N. 1610 Street, Suite 101 Phoenix, Adzona 85016 602.279.4373
or Arch itec al Se
Maricopa County Architectural Services / On-Call
Serial # 180007-ROQ Due Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017
Contract # 180007-ROQ Due Time: 2:00 PM (Arizona Time)
In BidSync.com

Arrington Watkins A ch;tects
August 22, 2017
Maricopa County Office of Procurement Services
320 W. Lincoln St. (2nd Floor)
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
RE: Request for Qualifications for Architectural Services for Maricopa County
Architectural Services / On-Call Contracts
Serial # 180007-ROQ / Contract # 180007-ROQ
Dear Members of the Selection Committee:
Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC is a full-service architectural and planning firm located in Phoenix, Arizona.
Our expertise is centered on technically complex projects for government agencies; we have completed over 70
projects for Maricopa County alone.
Attached you will find our Statement of Qualifications, responding in detail to each of your evaluation factors.
Prior Comparable Experience
• Experience on multiple projects for Maricopa County
• A company history of on-time and on-budget work
• Reputation for solid plans and budget accuracy
Key Team Members
• Experienced design leadership and a committed consultant team, as needed
• High level of technical expertise
• Staff of 42 enthusiastic, creative and innovative people
Team Approach Capabilities
• Our process is highly interactive
• Focused on your operations and needs
• We manage your schedule and budget for success
Additionally, we deliver superior service
• We are easy to work with
• Foster a team environment
• Attention to detail and quality
Thank you in advance for considering this SOQ. We look forward to continuing to put our experience and
commitment to work for Maricopa County. We acknowledge reading the questions/answers posted on Bidsync.
corn.
Sincerely,
Arrington VVatkins Architects, LLC
ael D. Quinn
Principal Architect
mquinn@awarch.com
IiQOfl Wakrts • 52,10 Street. Suite • illrierik, 8501E3•i:!-302) 2794373

I Prior Experience
Provide a project synopsis of a minimum of five (5 maximum of seven (7) projects for which your firm was
the lead architectural firm, reflects one or more of he service types indicated in the attachment section of
this solicitation.
PROJECT 1: Maricopa County San Tan Regional Court Center Chandler, Arizona
a) Size, sched le, budget and complexity of each Court security staff managed the public end of the
project. facility and screened the incoming visitors and staff.
Size: 46,400 SF Sheriffs staff managed the detention area and the
movement of detainees on the secure side of the
Schedule: February 2005 - March 2007 building. The four-court regional center also included
Budget: $9,986,088 social programs for the benefit of the community like
Complexity: The San Tan Regional Court Center is a domestic violence prevention, family counseling and
46,400 square foot building for the Maricopa County teen court coordinators.
Justice Courts situated on a 5-acre site in downtown b) Services provided. Programming, design, interior
Chandler, Arizona. Arrington Watkins was initially hired design, CD's, permitting, construction administration,
by the County to design a two-court facility with limited and LEED administration.
support services. However, during the CD phase the
Owners decided to expand the scope of work to a c) Owner's starting budget estimate and the final
full four-court facility with additional support services contract amount for each project. Include:
and program. The complexity of the project involved Owner's starting budget: $4,342,000
coordinating multiple stakeholders with various Final contract amount: $9,986,088
functions and different levels of security into a single d) Change orders to the design contract including
facility. Our collaborative effort with the judicial user the detailed reasons for the changes. Owner
groups was very successful and many of our space increased the project scope from two courts to a
designs became new County prototypes. We also four-courts facility including increases to the support
worked closely with City of Chandler to meet their services.
design guidelines within our program and budget.
e) Description of any savings achieved. On budget.
We worked closely with the judicial staff to fully f) Owner's requested start date of construction,
understand their operational needs and developed actual start date of construction, original final
efficient, functional spaces for courtrooms, hearing completion date and actual final completion date.
rooms, judicial chambers, clerk workstations, central fi
ling, public counters and county attorney and pro-tern Owner's start of construction: April 2005
spaces. Actual start of construction: July 2005
Original final completion: March 2007
Other judicial spaces incorporated were jury Actual final completion: March 2007
deliberation rooms, a constable's suite and mediation g) Client Reference (see Attachment 1 for complete
rooms for peaceful resolutions. reference information)
Coordinating security and managing pedestrian Rich Wegele, Maricopa County FMD
circulation was an important component of the project. Jim McFadden, JPM Associates
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 1

I Prior Experience (continued)
PROJECT 2: Maricopa County Clerk of the Courts Phoenix, Arizona
a) Si , hedule, budget a ccnpIexity of each b) Services provided. Program verification, design,
project. CD'S, permitting, CA and LEED administration.
Size: 43,000 SF c) Owner's starting budget estimate and the final
Schedule: July 2011 - May 2013 contract amount for each project. Include:
Budget: $9,100,000 Owner's starting budget: $9,100,000
Complexity: Renovation of a high profile space Final contract amount: $9,100,000
constructed in the 1960s to accommodate technically d) Change orders to the design contract including
complex courts operations. This project achieved the detailed reasons for the changes. Change orders
LEED Silver under the Commercial Interiors Rating on this project are owner requested changes based on
System. The project includes open office, private revised user group needs including finishes and FFE
office, and training rooms with critical adjacencies. The upgrades. Other change orders due to unforeseen
17-window file counter is connected to an accounting as-built conditions and abatement, covered by owner
operation with high volumes of cash. A Class 5 vault contingency.
was designed to handle the secured storage of that e) Description of any savings achieved. On budget.
cash. This was achieved through close communication
This project consisted of the complete renovation with owner and contractor so that decisions could be
of two separate spaces within the existing Maricopa made timely; comprehensive construction documents
County Central Courts Building. First Floor Clerk of the and specifications and weekly field observation, and
Courts consisted of 31,000 SF of space being gutted timely turn around of RFI and submittal documents and
and completely renovated for occupancy, by eight proactive resolution of unforeseen conditions impacting
departments and 215 staff members of the Central schedule.
Clerk of the Courts office. f) Owner's requested start date of construction,
The renovation included the design of new mechanical, actual start date of construction, original final
electrical, plumbing and fire sprinkler systems and completion date and actual final completion date.
services for designing the new systems furniture layout, Owner's start of construction: May 2012
detailed furniture specifications and coordination with Actual start of construction: May 2012
the furniture dealer. In the basement of the Central Original final completion: May 2013
Court Tower, Arrington Watkins created 5,600 SF of Actual final completion: May 2013
office space for the Procurement and Court Technology
Systems departments, including open office space, and g) Client Reference (see Attachment 1 for complete
storage and 1,927 SF of maintenance and workshop reference information)
space. Rich Wegele, Maricopa County FMD
Andrew Geier, Layton Construction
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 2

Prior Experience (continued)
PROJECT 3: Maricopa County Durango Jail Barracks
Phoenix, Arizona
aricopa County 1 Detention Facility.
a) Size, schedule, budget and complexity of each d) Change orders to the design contract including
project. the detailed reasons for the changes. -$33,564
Size: 2,800 SF (receiving dock and control room) (some unused allowance for unforeseen conditions
and some project savings).
Schedule: September 2013 - February 2014
e) Description of any savings achieved. Project
Budget: $1,100,000 savings included CMAR coordination with design team
Complexity: Project included renovations to the dorm on coordinating details, materials, and construction
housing, receiving dock, medical holding room and schedule.
visitation room. f) Owner's requested start date of construction,
The scope of work was to improve safety and visibility actual start date of construction, original final
for the officers in the dormitory housing units 08 and cornpletion date and actual final completion date.
D9, make dormitory units electrically independent from Owner's start of construction: September 2013
an emergency power point of view, increase visibility Actual start of construction: September 2013
from the visitation control desk, increase medical Original final completion: March 2014
holding safety, and resolve potential health code issues Actual final completion: February 2014
at the kitchen loading dock area.
g) Client Reference (see Attachment 1 for complete
b) Services provided. Programming, design, reference information)
construction administration
Susan Rojas, Brignall Construction
c) Owner's starting budget estimate and the final
contract amount for each project. Include:
Owner's starting budget: $1,036,732
Final contract amount: $1,003,168
— Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 3

I Prior Experience (continued)
PROJECT 4: Goodyear Master Plan and 911 Operations Center
Goodyear, Arizona
a) Size, schedule, budget and complexity of each Design and construction of the facility complies with
project. design and construction safety standards outlined in
Size: 11,677 SF the NFPA 1221 publication pertaining to communication
center sites and building design.
Schedule: October 2011 - December 2013
The services involved the assessment of the needs of
Budget: $7,241,150 a large group of stakeholders, projected over 5-, 10-
Complexity: Arrington Watkins provided the master and 20-year periods, and melding those needs into a
planning and Phase 1 design of this multi-phase single building program and master plan.
project. The master plan for the entire Goodyear b) Services provided. Prime architect. programming
Operations Center was needed to prioritize the City and design
functions to be located on the site at full build-out. The
development of the master plan ensured that the City c) Owner's starting budget estimate and the final
of Goodyear would maximize the use of the property it contract amount for each project. Include:
currently owns at this location with the most compatible Owner's starting budget: $7,241,150
uses and efficient lay out. Final contract amount: $7,241,150
The 911 Call Center provides for relocation of the City d) Change orders to the design contract including
of Goodyear's existing 911 Call Center and staff. It also the detailed reasons for the changes.
serves the radio dispatch needs of the City's public
safety officers and the inbound call volume demands Five change orders to allow for additional AV systems
of the general public on a 24/7 basis. The 911 Call that were required. Money was deducted from owner
Center is a LEED Certified design of a 5,000 SF police allowance.
911 dispatch center with a future expansion to 11,677 e) Description of any savings achieved. n/a
SF. This building was Phase 1 of the Goodyear Master f) Owner's requested start date of construction,
Plan which was developed to ensure that the City of actual start date of construction, original final
Goodyear would maximize the use of the property with completion date and actual final completion date.
the most compatible uses and efficient lay out.
Owner's start of construction: January 2012
At full build-out, the site is planned to be the location Actual start of construction: January 2013
of the Public Safety administration headquarters, Original final completion: September 2013
police impound yard, emergency operations center, Actual final completion: December 2013
municipal/public safety training center, public works
field operations, parks & recreation, 911 police g) Client Reference (see Attachment 1 for complete
dispatch center, neighborhood fire station and provide reference information)
community parks that will be the location of the City's Regis Reed, City of Goodyear
historic train depot.
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 4

I Prior Experience (continued)
PROJECT 5: entraI Arizona Prc;ect Conference Center
Phoenix, Arizona
a) Size, scheth bu get and complex y of each d) Ch .1ge orders to the design contract including
project. the detailed reasons for the changes. No change
Size: 18,000 SF (interior) / 5,000 SF (exterior) orders.
Schedule: S e) Description of any savings achieved. n/a
Budget: $5,000,000 f) Owner's requested start date of construction,
actual start date of construction, original final
Complexity: Design services for both the upgrade/ completion date and actual final completion date.
relocation of existing server room as well as the
addition of retrofitted multi-purpose space. Building #1 Owner's start of construction: January 2015
— Renovated 3,000 SF into a 2,000 SF server room, Actual start of construction: January 2015
400 SF equipment room, and converted remaining Original final completion: December 2015
space into a new lobby. Relocated 1,500 SF of existing Actual final completion: December 2015
server room functions to new space and renovated g) Client Reference (see Attachment 1 for complete
vacated space to office and conference functions. reference information)
Replaced existing building emergency generator Darren Couturier, Central Arizona Project
with new 750KW generator and yard. Building # 2 —
Renovated existing exterior ramps and building access
point into new 4,200 SF exterior meeting and informal
gathering spaces. Created new 14,000 SF board room
and conferencing center.
b) Services provided. Programming, schematicdesign,
construction documents, bid phase management,
construction and construction administration
c) Owner's starting budget estimate and the fir al
contract amount for each project. Include:
Owner's starting budget: $5,000,000
Final contract amount: $5,000,000
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 5

I Prior Experience (continued)
PROJECT 6: Maricopa County Jails Master Plan Maricopa County, Arizona
a) Size, schedule, budget and complexity of each b) Services provided.
project. Master planning, site analysis, systems analysis,
Size: 8,500 beds — expanding to 10,000 beds demographic analysis and growth projections,
Schedule: operational analysis, stakeholders interviews,
September 2013 to June 2014, 10 months system tours and review, outside agency facility
tours, stakeholders presentations, review of national
Budget: $996,000 guidelines, development of national benchmarking,
Complexity: To provide a development solution over coordination with courts master planning team,
a 10-year planning period that evaluated inmate development options, cost projections, and final
projections, demographic analysis, and operational recommendations.
needs. Review potential solutions that would meet c) Owner's starting budget estimate and the final
the growth and profile of the MCSO jail system, and contract amount for each project. Include:
appropriateness of renovations to existing facilities,
demolition of older jails, and the construction of new Starting budget $996,000, final cost $996,000
detention facilities. The master planning process d) Change orders to the design contract including
included the review of previous facility assessments, the detailed reasons for the changes.
master plans, and recent staff and facility assessments. No change orders.
Our team worked with a dynamic group of stakeholders
including the Owner MC, the project managers MC e) Description of any savings achieved.
FMD, MC OMB, MCSO, Jail operations, CHS, food $45K of the contract was not used and reverted back
services, facility operations, facility maintenance staff, to the owner.
MC Superior and Justice Courts, and City of Phoenix. f) Owner's requested start date of construction,
The team approach enabled us to develop five actual start date of construction, original final
development options, three were refined and tuned, completion date and actual final completion date.
and ultimately one was our final recommendation with Project was scheduled for ten months with completion
the most benefits to the Owner. MC OMB asked our by end of fiscal year 2014. Final schedule was
team to further review the recommended option to September 2013 through June of 2014, with delivery of
include a rapid deployment version that may reduce the final published master plan on June 29, 2014.
the overall cost due to time/construction escalation.
The key to the master plan was to create an Intake g) Client Reference (see Attachment 1 for complete
Transfer and Release (ITR) facility at the Durango reference information)
complex adjacent to the majority of the county inmates. Laurie Quarnstrom, Maricopa County FMD
This facility would have the flexibility to meet changing
needs and operational protocols, as well as reduce
transportation and transfer requirements.
A new ITR would have many benefits to the system CELL/DORM (ilF
that include: Reduced average length of stay for a LELL/PORM (LC
significant portion of the population, reduced average DAYROOM
booking times, reduced time to initial appearance, SEMRfTY
more releases directly from the ITR, faster turn time iNTERVI.Erl
for outside agencies, better continuum of care for
correction health services, single point of intake and
release for the system, less congestion downtown,
consolidated transportation hub and routes, and a
centralized property storage that does not require
handling or relocation of inmate property.
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 6

Prior Experience (continued)
PROJECT 7: 6r1nta Fe i'..reight Depot County sessor's Office
Phoenix, Arizona
a) Size, schedule, budget and complexity of each b) Services provided. Programming, design,
project. interior design, construction documents, permitting,
Size: 15,000 SF construction administration, and LEED administration.
Schedule: April 2010 March 2011 c) Owner's starting budget estimate and the final
contract amount for each project. Include:
Budget: $4,000,000
Owner's starting budget: $4,000,000
Complexity: One of Phoenix's historic downtown rail Final contract amount: $4,000,000
depots, left vacant for nearly 40 years, received new
life as the Maricopa County Assessor's Office went d) Change orders to the design contract including
through an ambitious renovation project undertaken by the detailed reasons for the changes. No change
Arrington Watkins Architects. The building, Santa Fe orders.
Freight Depot, was built in 1929 and served as a key e) Description of any savings achieved. Thorough
shipment post for goods moving to and from Phoenix investigation of existing conditions and adapting to
by rail until the 1960s, when it was abandoned and them. Working with the CMAR and key subs from early
used only for storage. Maricopa County purchased in the project.
the depot, which had narrowly escaped demolition, f) Owner's requested start date of construction,
in 1998, and hired Arrington Watkins to do a series of actual start date of construction, original final
small renovation projects before deciding to renovate completion date and actual final completion date.
the entire building in the early 2000s.
Owner's start of construction: September 2010
Searching for a way to consolidate offices and reduce Actual start of construction: September 2010
lease spending, the Maricopa County Assessor's Original final completion: March 2011
Office saw potential in the 15,000 SF depot, and hired Actual final completion: March 2011
Arrington Watkins for architectural services on this
CMAR project. Utilizing the original 1925 drawings, g) Client Reference (see Attachment 1 for complete
Arrington Watkins sought to preserve the exterior, reference information)
which is on Phoenix's historical register, while updating Tim Boncoskey, Maricopa County Assessor's Office
the interior for modern use. Santa Fe Freight Depot
achieved LEED Silver.
EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS
"Arrington Watkins truly listened to our needs and went outside the box to present creative ideas and
suggestions that exceeded our expectations!"
— Tim Boncoskey Maricopa County Assessor's Office Deputy Assessor
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 7

2 Key Team Members
List the key individuals that will be assigned under this contract and identify their positions within your firm. Include
a one (1) page resume describing applicable qualifications and experience. List examples of their experience
on similar projects, identifying project size, schedule and complexity, as well as their specific role. For each key
team member, provide a listing of projects comparable to those required in Section 1. Also include the following
information:
a) Provide graphical organization of proposed staff.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Arrington Watkins Architects
Mike Quinn,
Arrington Watkins Example Consultants
Professional Staff (assigned as needed)
(assigned as needed) Pearson, LSW, Pangolin,
Dibble, Studio4Design
Arrington Watkins is a full-service architectural-only firm. Because of this, we select the best qualified specialty
consultants needed to support each project. We will work with the County during project scoping to insure all
aspects of the project are properly and professionaly covered.
On-call contracts can include a wide variety of project work. Mike Quinn will be the point person on all projects
and will assign a project manager/architect to a project; aspiring to match staff expertise to the work at hand.
Our approach is to have a project manager/architect be the lead person on each project. The project manager's
primary role will be to attend initial meetings with users, calculate and negotiate fees, conduct quality control,
assess the client's needs, and to dedicate the resources necessary to complete each project. With knowledge
of the project, the project manager will then select support staff and/or consultants from our group of qualified
professionals who have the experience to provide the services outlined in the Request for Qualifications. The
staff we are proposing includes our most experienced project managers who will be committed to the assigned
projects from the beginning to its successful completion. The team will be supplemented with all of the resources
necessary to complete this project on time and within budget.
MANAGING CHALLENGES
"Arrington Watkins Architects are "problem solvers, not "problem makers."
— Hugh Gallagher, (Former) Deputy Administrator, Maricopa County Superior Courts
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 8

2 Key Team Members (continued)
Over the past 23 years, Arrington Watkins has completed more than 100 projects, primarily renovations,
remodeling and additions, through "continuing services" contracts with our clients, including:
• Maricopa County Facilities Management • City of Glendale
Department • City of Tempe
• City of Phoenix • Salt River Pima — Maricopa Indian Community
• Arizona Department of Administration
In addition, Arrington Watkins has provided similar professional services for the following municipalities and
other similar entities:
• Town of Queen Creek • City of Goodyear
• City of Scottsdale • City of El Mirage
• City of Peoria • City of Chandler
• City of Maricopa • Ak—Chin Indian Community
b) Include examples of projects where staff assigned to this contract has worked together as a team.
See figure below.
c) List example projects the proposed individuals of your firm and consultant firms have completed as
a team.
We combined questions b and c into one chart below and have listed only a few of our most recent projects that
we have worked on together.
,
Name of Project
Resumes are provided for Arrington Watkins team
Thornton n
Quinn io4desig
Patricia Pearson _o a) Complete
Mike .o Stud
L'5 (.3
r [
Maricopa County SE Regional Justice Center • • • • • • •
Maricopa County OET Building • • • • • •
Maricopa County Jails Intake Transfer Release Facility • • • • •
Maricopa County NW Regional Court Center • • • • • •
Maricopa County San Tan Regional Court Center • • • •
Navajo Nation DPSRTA Master planning • • • •
County Assessor's Office Santa Fe Depot Remodel • • • • •
Palo Verde Energey Education Center • • • • • •
Maricopa County Swing Space Remodel • • • • •
Maricopa County Jails Master Plan • • • • •
CAP ADA Upgrade Assessment and Project • • • • •
CAP Board Room and Conference Center • • • • •
Maricopa County Durango Jail Upgrades • • • • •
Ak-Chin Indian Community Justice Center • • • • •
Tempe Fire Station #7 • • • •
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 9

3 Team Approach Capability
It is Maricopa County's desire to establish a team approach for this project. The selected design firm will
work collaboratively, seek and accept input from with the Owner, Owner Consultants and the Contractor
to provide and maintain fiscally-efficient, operationally-safe and aesthetically-appropriate facilities
serving the citizens and stakeholders of Maricopa County.
a) Provide an example of a completed project (other than Maricopa County) where your firm's Agreement
for Services was with a Department representing the end user but not the actual end user of the project
itself?Describe your approach to all phases of the project's development including programming and
design as well as construction administration.
EXAMPLE PROJECT: 4,000-Bed Expansion for AZ Dept. of Corrections
The State of Arizona operates very similarly to Maricopa PROGRP,MMING
County as it relates to the design and construction
of detention projects. Similar to the FMD / MSCO The project approach included the formation and
relationship, Arizona projects are contracted for by involvement of an Executive Team, whose job it was
the Arizona Department of Administration (ADOA) for to work collaboratively to oversee and make final
use by the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC). decisions regarding the design and construction of
Arrington Watkins' Agreement for Services was with the project. All members of the Executive Team were
ADOA, who represented ADC as the end user but was involved in the project from beginning to end. The
not the end user of the project itself. members of this team were from ADOA, ADC (User),
McCarthy (Contractor) and AW. The initial project
We worked with ADOA, who was the ultimate decision Executive Team meeting was primarily to establish the
maker on the project, and worked collaboratively as project goals, mission, budget and schedule for the
a team with ADOA, ADC and the General Contractor, project, and to establish the lines of communication
McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. (McCarthy) to and authority.
complete the project, a 4,000-bed expansion to state
inmate beds. We take a partnering approach to every Once Arrington Watkins was given the NTP, the
project. Each team member brings a different strength Design Team began the process of gathering detailed
and different knowledge to the team. We value this, we information from the users and various stakeholders,
solicit their ideas and input, and we strive to provide including complex and unit security staff, food service
them with sufficient, timely information in return. We staff, maintenance staff, water- and, wastewater staff,
will bring that expertise to your projects. medical staff and regional operations staff. As a part
of the final review, the Design Team reported and
reviewed the programming results against the goals of
the Project, against the established ADC Physical Plant
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call! 180007-ROQ 10

3 Team Approach Capability (continued)
Standards and against the budget. Separate, parallel construction documents were completed and submitted
budgets were created by McCarthy and a third party for permits, rather than waiting until the entire project
estimator, who was a consultant to Arrington Watkins. was designed and permitted. By concentrating on
Differences in the two budgets were reconciled before smaller scopes of work, we were able to reduce the
being forwarded to the Executive Committee. unknowns more quickly, thereby solidifying the cost
After the final program was completed and approved by estimates early in the project. One significant example
the Executive Team, the programming team returned to of this was the early pre-engineered building package
the User Groups to report the final results. We have that locked in lower costs during a volatile steel market.
found that inviting the User Groups to participate in We don't anticipate multiple GMPs on your projects
the planning, and reporting the approved results back but monitoring of budget and schedule during design
to them, went a long way to having full buy-in and would be considered.
cooperation of the staff. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
DESIGN Because of the commitment of the entire team to
Each phase of the project began with an Executive continuity, the individuals who were part of the Design
Team meeting to review the work to date, and to review, Team continued their roles throughout the construction.
prioritize, and approve the direction going forward. The Arrington Watkins had a full time site representative on
Design Team would then again proceed through the each of the three sites, working side- by- side with the
following steps as necessary for each Phase: General Contractor. Although your projects may not
require this level of observation, AW is committed to
• Meet with the User and Stakeholder Groups 100% availability during the construction phase.
• Sum up findings and report back to the Executive Some of the effective processes we use are Paperless
Committee Submittals and a Field Question Process. The latter
• Revise and prioritize into needs and wants process is a reinvention of the typical RFI process which
• Receive approval from the Executive Committee could cost time on a tight schedule. When questions
did arise during construction, our approach was always
• Report initial findings back to the User Groups to focus on finding a solution and to solve the problem
• Make final revisions and receive the NTP from the with the least amount of time and money. This takes a
Executive Committee well orchestrated team effort. Tools like Go To Meeting
The use of multiple GMPs assisted in realizing a can be used get the team together immediately and
significant (30 day) reduction in schedule, which in work out the solution in real time. Work can continue
turn had a significant impact on the cost of GCs, and the RFI then becomes a "confirming" RFI for the
and therefore the project cost ($4.8 million savings). record. The goal is to solve the problem at the lowest
Construction was able to begin just as the final possible level as fast as possible.
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 11

3 Team Approach Capability (continued)
b) Using the example above (a), please describe an instance where this assembly of participants,
consultant, owner's representative, and end user, created conflict and/or uncertainty relative to
either design decisions or priorities. How did your firm communicate and build consensus among the
participants?
This project came to ADOA from the Arizona State Arrington Watkins became building consensus among
Legislature with the very specific mission and goal to the stakeholders and insuring that all parties were
build 4,000 new prison beds for $175 million, but no heard, in order to make a collective informed decision.
guidance on the location, amount of support space,
or configuration of those 4,000 beds. During the early The Executive Team, led by Arrington Watkins,
programming phase of the project, the Executive Team began eliminating ADC wish list items, with ADC's
decided upon a goal of four minimum security, 1,000- concurrence. We also began examining what made the
bed units on three different sites: a 1,000 -bed unit at 2,000-bed unit cheaper, and attempted to apply those
ASPC Perryville, a 1,000 bed unit at ASPC Tucson concepts to 1,000-bed units. We held special meetings
and two 1,000 bed units at ASPC Yuma. The goal also to analyze concepts, recalculate costs, and refine the
included significant support buildings and infrastructure project schedule to accomplish the significant reduction
improvements — a wish list. in cost, while satisfying ADC regarding operations
Toward the end of the Programming Phase, the Ultimately, the Team eliminated unnecessary buildings
CMAR's conceptual estimate to build this wish list was from the program, and chose not to construct the 2,000
$240 million, $65 million over the proposed budget! The bed unit, but rather to reconfigure the 1,000-bed units
Executive Team tasked itself with brainstorming and to reduce site development, utility distribution and
exploring ways to eliminate this deficit in the budget, building configuration, resulting in reducing costs to
over the course of the remaining design phases. within the $175 million budget by the time the Project
reached the Design Development phase.
In so doing, the members of the team presented
many ideas, including the idea of combining the two This is an excellent example that, if you are working
units in Yuma into one 2,000 bed unit, eliminating as a team, there really are no great conflicts but just
duplicate infrastructure and functions that could be issues that you work your way through as a Team.
shared. ADOA felt that this was a good solution and Though there were differences of opinion, no one really
prepared to move ahead. However, ADC, the user, viewed this as a conflict, but rather just an issue for the
was unsatisfied with this concept, primarily because team to resolve.
of what they considered operational risks. The task for
Participants/Stakeholders
Arizona Legislature
ADOA ADC
General Contractor Design Team
Goal Issue (Conflict) Solution
Build 4,000 new CMAR's conceptual After consensus, creative
prison beds estimate was reconfiguration of buildings
for $175 million $65 million and site to minimized utilities
over the proposed to reach the $175M goal.
budget
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call I 180007-ROQ 12

4 Expedited Completion or Project (Time Savings)
a) Describe what practices and procedures you scope, schedule and budget items are discussed
propose to save time in completing projects. each week, the results of the discussions recorded
The planning process is continuous throughout the and action items assigned to individuals with specific
project. From establishing goals of the client and timeframes for completion.
users, to developing and monitoring the schedule, Employ a Database to Control the Project: The
workload requirement and project costs, we are always Arrington Watkins team utilizes our own Project
evaluating and planning for the success of the project. Database System, which will be the cornerstone in the
This is a highly interactive process facilitated by our quality management of this project. Arrington Watkins
Project Manager, and involving consultants, the client uses this database to record and track information from
and the users. Components of the plan include: the program, design meetings, phone communications,
• Project scheduling: starting with the Scope of Work, correspondence, contact information, and virtually
prepare a comprehensive critical path schedule. every bit of useful information developed regarding the
project. It produces conference reports, QA checklists,
• Manpower planning: planning/managing our own discipline reports, field reports, and construction logs.
company's manpower so the project is well supported.
Utilize Design Checklists: Architecturally, Arrington
• Consultant management: identify what consultants Watkins regularly utilizes checklists, which are based
need in order to keep consultants informed, providing on room-by-room lists and site-specific subjects. In
data ahead of need, and keeping them on schedule. addition, all meeting minutes are carried forward and
• Proactive approach to plan review: Meet soon become checklist items to ensure that nothing that was
after NTP with Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). In discussed was missed in the implementation of the
the initial meeting we will review county requirements drawings.
and show conceptual design and code analysis to Use BIM: AW will establish themselves as the BIM
establish any special requirements. When AHJ's manager during design. In other words the architectural
become involved in the initial design phase they team will establish the "real world" coordinates of the
are treated like a team member. This facilitates model, establish the development standards and link
communication across those lines. all consultant models into one source model. We will
• Take a holistic design approach. The AW team will use Revit (BIM) modeling software to coordinate the
gather data, including operational and programming work in design and explore potential construction
needs, aesthetic interior and exterior visions for the conflicts. Architectural, structural and MPE models
project, sustainable goals, facilities maintenance are combined and explored for misalignments, gaps
requirements and security needs, for example, and and tight areas which would lead to questions during
incorporate these into one cohesive design. construction. With this software we have the ability to
b) Describe the resources that your firm uses in design and create schedules simultaneously.
carrying out the above practices and procedures. Web based sharing: We maintain a web based
The design team has a group of specialized "Sharefile" site for storing and sharing documents
management documents at their disposal which are and models with the entire team. Consultants receive
instrumental in the implementation of our scheduling, notification when our models change so that team is
budgeting, and quality control. always up to date.
Weekly Project Meetings: We propose to organize Coordination review meetings: Special meetings are
weekly meetings throughout the project as a means held with consultants to review drawings in detail and
to effectively manage a project and to bring it to a resolve concerns at each phase of the work.
successful completion. Meeting minutes record the
5 Arizona Business and Location of Arizona Office
The Proposer selected under this RFQ must hold an Arizona Business License and have an Arizona office
location. Include in your Proposal a statement that you hold the appropriate license and the license type and
number. Also, describe your existing Arizona office.
Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC is a limited liability company licensed in Arizona. Our Arizona Business License
number is L-0732132-0. Our office is located at 5240 N. 16th St., Suite 101, Phoenix, Arizona.
Arrington Watkins Architects Maricopa County RFQ for Architectural Services / On-Call l 180007-ROQ 13

Mike Quinn RA, LEED AP, PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT
In his 22 years atArrington Watkins, Mike has held the position of Project Manager
and Project Architect on many of the firm's largest and most challenging criminal
justice projects as well as public works projects. In this position, he has been
responsible for not only the management of the project, but the programming,
design, construction documents and construction administration.
One of Mike's signature projects is the $200 million, 5,000 bed Arizona State
Prison Complex — Lewis for the State of Arizona. Not only did Mike manage
this massive project from beginning to end, he was largely responsible for its
EDUCATION: programming and design.
Master of Architecture,
Arizona State University PROJECT EXPERIENCE
BS Architecture, Maricopa County Jail ITR Durango Facility, Phoenix, Arizona
University of Maryland Project size: 474,00 SF / 1,792 beds
BA Fine Arts, University Schedule: 10/2015 - 11/2018 (proposed)
of Maryland Complexity: Design and construction of a one-story, short-term housing Inmate
Transfer and Release Facility (ITR) along with a minimum/medium security
LICENSES/ detention facility.
REGISTRATION: Role: Project Manager
Arizona #35827 City of Glendale Municipal Landfill Relocation Project, Glendale, Ariozna
Nevada #7619 Project size: 10,371 SF (3 . buildings)
NCARB Certified Schedule: 5/2012 - 1/2017
Complexity: Relocation of scale house, administration building, and maintenance
LEED AP areas. Scope of work is to assess conditions of facilities, equipment, and utilities;
establish needs and goals; perform site analysis to determine appropriate siting
AFFILIATIONS: offacilities; and establish a budgetary statement of probable cost. Due to funding,
DBIA Member project was constructed in phases.
APWA Member Role: Project Manager
USGBC Member Central Arizona Project Conference Center Remodel, Phoenix, Arizona
RMFMA Member Project size: 18,000 SF
Schedule: 11/2014 - 12/2015
Former President Complexity: Design services for both the upgrade/relocation of existing server
USBGC Arizona room as well as the addition of retrofitted multi-purpose space. Created new
YEARS OF 14,000 SF board room and conferencing center.
EXPERIENCE: 32 Role: Project Manager
YEARS WITH FIRM: City of Goodyear Fleet Maintenance Facility, Goodyear, Arizona
22 Project size: 14,750 SF
Schedule: 5/2013 - 8/2014
Complexity: The fleet maintenance facility occupies a 10 acre site within the 90
acre operations facility. It services a fleet of over 300 vehicles and is designed
for growth up to 400 vehicles, including both light and heavy-duty vehicles. This
includes servicing the fire department's largest fire apparatus vehicles.
Role: Project Manager

Marcelo Reyna, PROJECT MANAGER
Marcelo has served as a project manager since 2000 on several large-scale facilities
with a focus on government, criminal justice, public works and industrial projects.
His experience includes providing services ranging from building assessments,
site investigations, data gathering, programming and master planning. Marcelo's
approach to consensus building has proven to be successful in satisfying the
needs and goals of multiple stakeholders and user groups for many clients. Other
areas of expertise include managing the preparation of construction documents,
specifications, construction administration, permitting and cost estimating. An area
of specialization is sustainability and LEED-certification. Marcelo is our Sustanbility
EDUCATION: Director and passionate about green building design.
B.A. Architecture
University of Notre PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Dame Maricopa County Northwest Regional Court Center
Project Size: 36,000 SF
LICENSES/ Schedule: June 2004 - March 2006
AFFILIATIONS: Complexity: First of three Regional Justice Centers designed by Arrington Watkins
USGBC-AZ Chapter for Maricopa County. The building allowed the justice courts to join together to share
Education Chair 2009- spaces for public, sheriff, public defender, county attorney and court administration
2010 spaces.
Role: Project Manager
Arrington Watkins
Sustainability Director Maricopa County San Tan Regional Court Center
Project Size: 46,400 SF
Greenbuild 2009 Schedule: February 2005 - March 2007
Arizona Host Committee Complexity: Developed a new court prototype based on Arrington Watkins' design
Greenbuild 2009 Off-site of the Northwest Justice Court in Surprise, while satisfying the unique requirements
Education Committee of this site and these Justices.
Chair Role: Project Manager
USGBC-AZ Central Maricopa County Southeast Regional Court Center
Branch Education Chair Project Size: 235,000 SF
2006-2009 Schedule: February 2006 - August 2007 (design only)
USGBC-AZ fouding Complexity: Site planning, design and integration of a new 4-story multi-purpose
member 2001 Courts building and parking garage into an existing Southeast Regional Justice
complex. A major challenge was incorporating 7 new user groups including Justice
YEARS OF Courts, EDC/RCC Courts, Adult and Juvenile Probation Services and a Sheriff's
EXPERIENCE: 23 Substation with the existing Superior Court functions through a single entry.
Role: Project Manager
YEARS WITH FIRM: Ak-Chin Indian Community Multi-Purpose Justice Center, Maricopa, Arizona
21 Project Size: 62,440 SF
Schedule: May 2011 - April 2014
Complexity: A multifaceted complex, joining together tribal courts, police, and
detention facilities in one single-story building. The L-shaped building contains
distinct spaces for each department, while maintaining one central entrance and
lobby, as well as communal storage and shipping facilities.
Role: Asisted in court programs and court schematic design

Patricia Thornton RA, LEED AP, PROJECT MANAGER
Palle joined Arrington Watkins in 2007 with 11 years of experience in commercial,
retail, restaurant and medical industries. Anxious to move into more technically
complex work, she has come to design and manage projects in the civic arena.
Palle has a strong construction background and makes use of that experience
in the office and in the field. She is extremely client attentive and has the strong
leadership skills that can take a team to a successful outcome. She has worked
with multiple project delivery methods and her project experience includes
programming, masterplanning, schematic and design development, assemblage
of contract documents through the permitting process, and construction
EDUCATION: management.
Master of Architecture,
New Jersey Institute of PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Technology Maricopa County Northwest Regional Court Center
Project Size: 36,000 SF
Bachelor of Arts, Schedule: June 2004 - March 2006
Kern University Complexity: First of three Regional Justice Centers designed by Arrington
Watkins for Maricopa County. The building allowed the justice courts to join
LICENSES/ together to share spaces for public, sheriff, public defender, county attorney and
REGISTRATION: court administration spaces.
AZ #49091 Role: Project Architect
California #C33332 Maricopa County Clerk of the Courts Renovation
Nevada #7633 Project Size: 43,000 SF
NCARB Certified Schedule:
Complexity: Renovation of a high profile space constructed in the 1960s to
LEED AP accommodate technically complex courts operations. Project includes open
YEARS OF office, private office, and training rooms with critical adjacencies. LEED Silver
EXPERIENCE: 21 Role: Project Manager
YEARS WITH FIRM: Maricopa County County Assessor's Santa Fe Depot Remodel
10 Project Size: 15,000 SF
Schedule: April 2010 - March 2011
Complexity: Renovation of the Santa Fe Freight Depot. Building was completely
modernized to be an ADA-compliant workspace for over 70 employees. Special
attention was given to preserving the unique history of the building by incorporating
railroad details into the decor. LEED Silver.
Role: Project Manager / Project Architect
Maricopa County Swing Space Chambers Building
Project Size: 18,000 SF
Schedule: November 2010 - May 2011
Complexity: Remodel in an historic structure. Conversion of data storage area
to modern office space.
Role: Project Coordinator
San Bernardino County Central Valley Juvenile Detention and Assessment
Center, San Bernardino, California
Project Size: 128,616 SF
Schedule: March 2009 - May 2011
Complexity: Demolition of part of the current facility, utilizing phased construction
to allow ongoing facilities to remain functional during demolition, renovation to
the exterior of an administration building and new construction.
Role: Project Manager

Mike Conder RA, AIA, PROJECT MANAGER
Mike has over 19 years of architectural experience with a Bachelor of Science
in Architectural Design and a Masters of Architecture degree from Arizona State
University. His professional career includes projects in the fields of justice,
education, sports, tenant improvements, office and mixed-use. He is well versed
in conventional construction technologies and multiple delivery methods. He has
extensive experience in all aspects of project management including scheduling,
budgeting, programming, design, documentation and construction administration.
Mike takes a client-centered approach to design and project management, always
looking at the project from the eyes of the owner, user groups and maintenance
EDUCATION: personnel.
Masters of Architecture,
Arizona State University PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Bachelor of Science, Palo Verde Energy Education Center, Buckeye, Arizona
Architectural Design, Project Size: 32,000 SF
Arizona State University Schedule: 8 months for construction
Complexity: This project consists of a 220 seat auditorium, public lobby and
Masters of Business energy learning center, 180 person training room, operations and communications
Administration, center to monitor emergency operations at the Palo Verde nuclear plant.
University of Arizona Role: Project Manager
LICENSES/ Maricopa County Buckeye Operations Building
REGISTRATION: Project Size: 5,000 SF
Arizona #47991 Schedule: February 2012 - December 2012
Wyoming #C-3157 Role: Project Manager
Illinois #12194
Washington #12194 Maricopa County Juvenile Probation Tenant Improvement*
Nevada #7625 Project Size: 24,000 SF multi-phase tenant improvement
Texas 326340 Schedule: 8 months for demolition and construction
NCARB Certified Complexity: This multi-phased project included the relocation of a server
room, demolition of the entire suite and design and construction of the tenant
improvement. The spaces include a large public lobby, training rooms, private
AFFILIATIONS: meeting rooms, private offices, a large break room and open office areas.
A IA Government Affairs Role: Project Architect
Committee
American Correctional Palo Verde Protected Area Warehouse, Buckeye, Arizona
Association Project Size: 85,000 SF
Schedule: February 2012 - November 2012
YEARS OF Description: The Palo Verde Protected Area Warehouse serves as support and
EXPERIENCE: 19 storage for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station in Buckeye, Arizona. The
85,000 SF concrete tilt-up building contains 63,000 SF of warehouse space, as
YEARS WITH FIRM: 9 well as offices, a processing site and loading docks, all enclosed in a secure
perimeter. The warehouse mainly contains equipment and parts for the repair and
maintenance of the three nuclear reactors on site.
Role:Project Manager
* work done with previous company.

Matthew Gorman RA, LEED AP, PROJECT MANAGER
Matt has unrivaled experience with essential services facilities such as public
safety facilities, including fire, police, courts and detention facilities. He has
worked with many local municipalities, state governments and federal agencies
to create secure, functional and aesthetic facilities that incorporate the latest
thinking in the field of public safety. Matt has extensive experience in police / fire
facilities and is Arrington Watkins public safety expert. He is well versed in all
aspects of project management including scheduling, budgeting, programming,
design, documentation and construction administration.
EDUCATION: PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Master of Architecture, APS Palo Verde Flex Equipoment Storage, Phoenix, Arizona
Arizona State University, Project Size: 51,275 SF
Schedule: November 2013 - February 2015
Bachelor of Science, Complexity: Equipment/vehicle storage facility with drive-thru bays on a secured
Architecture, Arizona facility. Also included office conference space, trailer mounted equipment and
State University communications equipment buildings..
Role: Project Manager
LICENSES/ North County Fire & Medical District Fire Stations #103 and #104, Sun City
REGISTRATION: West, Arizona
Arizona #30774 Project Size: 12,000 SF / 5,690 SF
Nevada #7628 Schedule: July 2014 - December 2015
Kentucky, 7728 Complexity: Fire station #103 is a complete renovation of a 12,000 SF building;
Fire station #104 is a new facility with 1,440 SF living quarters and 4,250 SF
LEED® AP BD+C appartus building.
NCARB Certified Role: Project Manager
City of Tempe Police Training Facility Study, Tempe, Arizona
AFFILIATIONS: Project Size: 96,800 SF
International Association Schedule: October 2016 - December 2016
of Chiefs of Police Complexity: Provided a preliminary study including projected costs to justify the
need to build a new training facility for the Tempe Police Department. The study
YEARS OF defined square footage, acreage and a cost estimate for the purpose of obtaining
EXPERIENCE: 32 funds.
Role: Project Manager
YEARS WITH FIRM: El Mirage Police Station, El Mirage, Arizona
22 Project Size: 22,692 SF
Schedule: April 2012 — December 2013
Complexity: The new police facility contains administrative offices, evidence
processing and storage, cells for both juveniles and adults, patrol and investigation
work areas, K-9 facilities, public training and media rooms, locker rooms and
briefing rooms.
Role: Project Manager
Tempe Apache Boulevard Police Substation, Tempe, Arizona
Project Size: 88,500 SF
Schedule: May 2004 - May 2007
Complexity: New police station houses North Patrol operations, traffic operations,
911 and dispatch center, property and evidence building, large vehicle storage
and secure parking.
Arrington Watkins Architects Role: Project Manager

Attachment 1 — REFERENCE FORMAT
Maricopa County requires a minimum of three (3) Owner references and three (3) Contractor References for
your (most recently) completed projects, which are similar in magnitude, complexity, and dollar value. This form
may be replicated as needed to be responsive to the Request for Qualifications.
PROJECT 1: Maricopa County San Tan Regional Court Center
1. Company Name: Maricopa County MID [Owner]
Address: 401 W. Jefferson St., Phoenix, AZ 85003
Phone Number: (602) 506-6060
Facsimile Number: (602). 506-1556
Person to Contact: Rich Wegele
(Email Address): richwegele@mail.maricopa.gov
Owner's Bid # or Project #: 19220S
Date of Completion: March 2007
Project Delivery Method (DBB/DB/CMAR): DB
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name): San Tan Regional Court
Center. 46,400 SF of courts, judicial suites and administrative space. Team: Arrington Watkins: Marcelo
Reyna; Sahara (contractor), CH2M Hill, Studio4Design, Dibble
2. Company Name: JPM Associates [Contractor]
Address: PO Box 59836, Phoenix, AZ 85044
Phone Number: (602) 703-3201
Facsimile Number: n/a
Person to Contact: Jim McFadden
(Email Address): jpm-associates@cox.net
Owner's Bid # or Project #: 19220S
Date of Completion: March 2007
Project Delivery Method (DBB/DB/CMAR): DB
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name): San Tan Regional Court
Center. 46,400 SF of courts, judicial suites and administrative space. Team: Arrington Watkins: Marcelo
Reyna; Sahara (contractor), CH2M Hill, Studio4Design, Dibble
PROJECT 2: Maricopa County Clerk of the Courts
3. Company Name: Maricopa County FMD [Owner]
Address: 401 W. Jefferson St., Phoenix, AZ 85003
Phone Number: (602) 506-6060
Facsimile Number: (602) 506-1556
Person to Contact: Rich Wegele
(Email Address): richwegele@mail.maricopa.gov
Owner's Bid # or Project #: C-91-11-240-5-00 (918-11-033)
Date of Completion: May 2013
Project Delivery Method (DBB/DB/CMAR): CMAR
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name): Maricopa County Clerk
of the Courts Renovation. Renovation of two separate spaces within existing Maricopa County Central
Courts building. Team: Arrington Watkins: Patricia Thornton and Marcelo Reyna. Layton (contractor), Eco 3D,
Studio4Design, Pearson Engineering

Attachment 1 — REFERENCE FORMAT (continued)
Maricopa County requires a minimum of three (3) Owner references and three (3) Contractor References for
your (most recently) completed projects, which are similar in magnitude, complexity, and dollar value. This form
may be replicated as needed to be responsive to the Request for Qualifications.
4. Company Name: Layton Construction [Contractor]
Address: 4686 E. Van Buren St., Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ 85008
Phone Number: (602) 977-3044
Facsimile Number: (602) 840-8646
Person to Contact: Andrew Geier
(Email Address): ageier@laytoncompanies.com
Owner's Bid # or Project #: C-91-11-240-5-00 (918-11-033)
Date of Completion: May 2013
Project Delivery Method (DBB/DB/CMAR): CMAR
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name): Maricopa County Clerk
of the Courts Renovation. Renovation of two separate spaces within existing Maricopa County Central
Courts building. Team: Arrington Watkins: Patricia Thornton and Marcelo Reyna. Layton (contractor), Eco 3D,
Studio4Design, Pearson Engineering
PROJECT 3: Maricopa County Durango Jail Barracks
5. Company Name: Brignall Construction [Contractor]
Address: 141 E Palm Lane, Suite 205, Phoenix, AZ 85004
Phone Number: (602) 265-8339
Facsimile Number: (602) 265-8419
Person to Contact: Susan Rojas
(Email Address): susan@brignall.com
Owner's Bid # or Project #: FM131228 (FMD Project Number)
Date of Completion: February 2014
Project Delivery Method (DBB/DB/CMAR): CMAR
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name): Durango Jail Safety
Improvements. Project included renovatons to the dorm housing, receiving dock, medical holding room and
visitation room. Team: Arrington Watkins: Mike Quinn. Brignall (contractor), Bridgers & Paxton, PK Associates
PROJECT 4: Goodyear Master Plan and 911 Operations Center
6. Company Name: City of Goodyear [Owner]
Address: 195 N. 145th Ave., Bldg. D, Goodyear, AZ 85338
Phone Number: (623) 882-7098
Facsimile Number: (623) 882-7941
Person to Contact: Regis Reed
(Email Address): regisseed@goodyearaz.gov
Owner's Bid #01 Project #: FA1101 / CON 11-1749
Date of Completion: December 2013
Project Delivery Method (DBB/DB/CMAR): CMAR
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name): Goodyear Operations
Center Design. Master plan design for Goodyear Operations Center and phase 1 - 911 Call Center. Team:
Arrington Watkins: Mike Quinn. LSW Engineers, Dibble, Paragon, Applied Engineering

Attachment 1 — REFERENCE FORMAT (continued)
Maricopa County requires a minimum of three (3) Owner references and three (3) Contractor References for
your (most recently) completed projects, which are similar in magnitude, complexity, and dollar value. This form
may be replicated as needed to be responsive to the Request for Qualifications.
PROJECT 5: Central Arizona Project Board Room and Conference Center
7. Company Name: Central Arizona Project [Owner]
Address: 23636 North Seventh Street, Phoenix, AZ 85024
Phone Number: (623) 869-2266
Facsimile Number: (623) 869-2249
Person to Contact: Darren Couturier
(Email Address): dcouturier@cap-az.com
Owner's Bid # or Project #: C1379
Date of Completion: December 2015
Project Delivery Method (DBB/DB/CMAR): DB
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name): CAP Server Room and
Conference Center remodel. Design services for upgrade/relocation of existing server room; remodel for
new multi-purpose space; created new board room and conferenceing center. Team: Arrington Watkins: Mike
Quinn. D.L. Withers (contractor), LSW Engineers, Dibble, PK Associates, Studio4Design
PROJECT 6: Maricopa County Jails Master Plan
8. Company Name: Maricopa County FMD [Owner]
Address: 401 W. Jefferson St., Phoenix, AZ 85003
Phone Number: (602) 506-7084
Facsimile Number: (602) 506-1556
Person to Contact: Laurie Quarnstrom
(Email Address): laurie.quarnstronn@fm.maricopa.gov
Owner's Bid # or Project #: 9999-15-1348
Date of Completion: June 2014
Project Delivery Method (DBB/DB/CMAR): Master Plan Study
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name): Maricopa County Jails
Master Plan. Provided detention master planning services to develop options for the use of current facilities
and future needs with the objective of replacing aging jail facilities and improving existing jail sites over the next
10 years. Team: Arrington Watkins: Mike Quinn. CGL, RLB
PROJECT 7: Santa Fe Freight Depot County Assessor's Office
9. Company Name: Maricopa County Assessor [End user]; HAD [Owner]
Address: 301 West Jefferson Street Suite 330, Phoenix, AZ 85003
Phone Number: (602) 372 -3796
Facsimile Number: (602) 506-3394
Person to Contact: Tim Boncoskey
(Email Address): boncoskeyt@mail.maricopa.gov
Owner's Bid # or Project #: 3321-10-700
Date of Completion: March 2011
Project Delivery Method (DBB/DB/CMAR): CMAR
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name): Santa Fe Freight Depot
County Assesor's Office. Renovation of the Santa Fe Freight Depot. Building was completely modernized to
be an ADA-compliant workspace for over 70 employees. Special attention was given to preserving the unique
history of the building by incorporating railroad details into the decor. LEED Silver. Team: Arrington Watkins:
Patricia Thornton. CCMC, Pearson Engineering, Studio4Design, Paragon

Attachment 2 - LEGAL WORKER CERTIFICATION
August 22, 2017
(Date)
lvlaricopa County
Office of Procurement Services
320 W. Lincoln St. (2nd Floor)
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
As required by Arizona Revised Statutes 01-4401, Maricopa County (the "County") is prohibited, after September
30, 2008 from awarding a contract to any contractor who fails, or whose subcontractors fail, to comply with Arizona
Revised Statutes § 23-214-A. The undersigned entity warrants that it complies fully with all federal immigration
laws and regulations that relate to its employees, that it shall verify, through the employment verification pilot
program as jointly administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security
Administration or any of its successor programs, the employment eligibility of each employee hired after December
31, 2007, and that it shall require its subcontractors and sub-subcontractors to provide the same warranties to the
below entity.
The undersigned acknowledges that a breach of this warranty by the below entity or by any subcontractor or sub-
subcontractor under any Contract resulting from this solicitation shall be deemed a material breach of the Contract,
and is grounds for penalties, including termination of the Contract, by the County. The County retains the right to
inspect the records of the below entity, subcontractor and sub-subcontractor employee who performs work under the
Contract, and to conduct random verification of the employment records of the below entity and any subcontractor
and sub-subcontractor who works on the Contract, to ensure that the below entity and each subcontractor and sub-
subcontractor is complying with the warranties set forth above.
Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC 5240 N. 16th St., Suite 101
(Firm) (Address Line 1)
Michael D. Quinn Phoenix, AZ 85016
(Print Name) (Address Line 2)
Principal 602-279 -4373
(Print Title) (Phone)
602-279 -9110
(Si equired) (Fax)
mquinn@awarch.com 86-0779271
(Email Address) (Federal Taxpayer ID Number)
Request For Qualifications for Architectural Services Page 20
Architectural Services /On-Call Serial# 180067-R00

Attachment - SELECTED SERVICES CERTIFICATION
SELECTED SERVICES CERTIFICATION
On behalf of Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC(firm name), I submit that the named firm is applying for the
marked fields listed below. I further certify that those fields of architecture and are provided by the named firm in-
house and are not supplied by the use of outside sub-consultants. I further submit and certify that my firm has the
appropriate licenses and registrations as required under Arizona Revised Statute.
ri LLB il:.0\-i1.iiAf ( \A
Architectural Services X
Master Planning Services X
Space Planning Services X
Landscape Architecture
Facility Condition index Assessments
Interior Design X
Building information Modeling X
Building Commissioning Services
Environmental Architecture X
Structural Design
Construction Management
Additional disciplines as applicable:
Physical Security Consulting X
Sustainable Design X
Date: August 22, 2017
Michael D. Quinn
Printed
Principal
Title
Request For Qualifications for Architectural Services Page 21
Architectural Services fOn-Call Serial 0007-ROQ

Attachment 4 - NON COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ARIZONA
)§
COUNTY OF MARICOPA
Michael D. Quinn being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
That he is Principal of Arrington Watkins Architects, LLC
(Title) (Name of Business)
bidding on 180007-ROQ for the construction of Architectural Services /0n -Call in the County of Maricopa„ State
of Arizona.
That, in connection with the above-mentioned project, neither he, nor anyone associated with the aforesaid business,
has, directly or indirectly, participated in any collusion, entered into any contract, combination, conspiracy or other
act in restr4int of trade or commerce in violation of the provisions of A.R.S. § 34-251, Article 4, as amended.
gnature. of Affiant)
Subscribed and. sworn to before me this day of
My Commission Expires:
(Notary Public)
(Please ensure seal is visible)
Request For Qualifications for Architectural Setvices Page 22
.41-chitectural Services /0n -Cali Serial# 180007-R00