171079-CONTRACT - VAN BOERUM & FRANK ASSOCIATES.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2017-09-20)

View PDF Item 70 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf_layout) 149782 characters
ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT (TERM)
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
Term Electrical Engineering Services
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Office of Procurement Services
Serial # 171079-ROQ
Contract # 171079-ROQ
c-
Project # 171079-ROQ
Facilities Management Depai tiiient
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
3 YEAR TERM
ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 1

Table of Contents
RECITALS 4
SECTION I - ENGINEER'S BASIC SERVICES 4
SECTION II- PERIOD OF SERVICE 5
SECTION III - REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6
SECTION IV - COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES 7
SECTION V - COMPENSATION AND PAYMENTS 7
SECTION VI- PROJECT CONSTRUCTION BUDGET AND COST ESTIMATES 8
SECTION VII- ENGINEER'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 9
SECTION VIII- TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 9
SECTION IX - OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 9
SECTION X - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 9
SECTION XI- INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE 10
SECTION XII - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 12
SECTION XIII - NO KICK-BACK 13
SECTION XIV - NONDISCRIMINATION, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, &
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES; SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY 13
SECTION XV - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 13
SECTION XVI - CONFLICTS 14
SECTION XVII - CONTINGENCY FEE 14
SECTION XVIII - MATERIALITY AND WAIVER OF BREACH 14
SECTION XIX - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 14
SECTION XX - SEVERANCE 15
SECTION XXI - JOINT PREPARATION 15
SECTION XXII - PRIORITY OF PROVISIONS 15
SECTION XXIII - APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE 15
SECTION XXIV - AMENDMENTS 15
SECTION XXV - PRIOR AGREEMENTS 15
SECITON XXVI - DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE 16
SECTION XXVII - INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE 16
SECTION XXVIII - LEGAL WORKER REQUIREMENTS 16
SECTION XXIX - ATTACHMENTS 16
SECTION XXX - NOTICES 16
SECTION XXXI - CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION 17
SECTION XXXII - CONTRACT EXECUTION 18
SECTION XXXIII - ISRAEL BOYCOTT: 18
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 2

EXHIBIT A - PROJECT SERVICES 20
I - GENERAL 20
II- PRE-DESIGN SERVICES PHASE 20
III - SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE 20
IV - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 21
V - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 21
VI- QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 22
VII- BIDDING PHASE 23
VIII- CONSTRUCTION PHASE 23
IN - ENGINEERS REQUIRED ADDITIONAL SERVICES 25
X - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL(s) 26
EXHIBIT B — HOURLY RATES 28
EXHIBIT C - MARICOPA COUNTY SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM
PARTICIPATION REPORTING FORM 29
EXHIBIT D - LEGAL WORKER CERTIFICATION 30
EXHIBIT E - ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 31
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 3

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AND Van Boerum & Frank Associates, Inc.
FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
hereinafter called the "COUNTY" and Van Boerum & Frank Associates, Inc.; hereinafter called the
"ENGINEER."
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes § 11-251(8) and § 34-102, the Board of Supervisors has the authority
to enter into contracts for the construction of such buildings and structures are necessary, and for
alterations thereto, and for the employment of ENGINEERS as warranted by the type of construction.
B. The COUNTY proposes to engage the service of an engineering firm to perform certain engineering and
engineering services for the COUNTY on an "on-call" or "as needed" basis. This Agreement is intended
to cover performance by the ENGINEER under individual Task Orders. The terms of this Agreement and
a Task Order govern the ENGINEER's work unless the ENGINEER and the COUNTY agree otherwise n
writing.
C. The COUNTY may require drawings, plans, specifications, cost estimates, construction administration,
and other engineering services, and the ENGINEER is willing to prepare such drawings, plans,
specifications, cost estimates, provide construction administration, and perform other engineering services
under this Agreement as may be required by the COUNTY.
D. The COUNTY desires to contract with the ENGINEER for the preparation of such drawings, plans,
specifications, cost estimates, construction administration, and other engineering services on such terms
and conditions as hereinafter follows:
E. NOW THEREFORE, on consideration of the premises and the mutual promises herein contained, the
COUNTY and the ENGINEER agree as follows:
SECTION I - ENGINEER'S BASIC SERVICES
A. GENERAL
1. The ENGINEER shall prepare drawings, plans, and specifications and cost estimates according to the
direction and designated standards of the COUNTY. Also, in consideration of the fee hereinafter
stated, the ENGINEER agrees to perform contract administration, inspection services and other
engineering services on the PROJECT as described in this Section. It is understood and agreed that
the County's authorized Administration for the PROJECT shall be the Director of Facilities
Management Department, or designee.
2. The ENGINEER shall review the requirements of the PROJECT as outlined by the COUNTY. Prior
to performance of any services under this Agreement, the ENGINEER and his consultants shall meet
with the authorized COUNTY personnel to review the scope and nature of the work to be performed.
3. The ENGINEER shall be responsible for providing written minutes of all PROJECT meetings that
occur during the course of this work under this Agreement, which are attended by the ENGINEER or
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. I71079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 4

his representative and by the representatives of the COUNTY. A copy of these minutes shall be sent
to, and received by, the COUNTY no later than three (3) working days after the meeting date. The
ENGINEER will be responsible for final publishing and distributing of meeting minutes as directed by
the COUNTY.
4. The ENGINEER will meet with the COUNTY and representatives of appropriate jurisdictional
agencies to review the requirements of the project and the solutions proposed by the ENGINEER at
times appropriate to the PROJECT. At no time shall the ENGINEER meet with jurisdictional agencies
without prior consent or attendance of COUNTY representatives.
5. The ENGINEER may be required to coordinate with the COUNTY and its designated workstation
supplier for the design and provisions for installation of open office workstations. This work may
include but is not limited to: layout of workstations per COUNTY standards, providing backgrounds
on AutoCAD to the supplier for shop drawing purposes, coordination with the electrical systems of the
building, and provision in the specifications for installation of COUNTY supplied workstations by the
Contractor.
6. As a part of basic services, the ENGINEER will produce record drawings from the marked-up plans
prepared by the Contractor. Record drawings shall be submitted on CD discs as required by the
COUNTY containing the complete drawings in a pdf electronic format that is 100% compatible with
AutoCAD, references bound.
7. Typical project services are listed in attached Exhibit A. The compensation method shall be
determined on a project by project basis, utilizing Exhibit B ("Hourly Rates") for reference only.
SECTION II- PERIOD OF SERVICE
A. The initial contract shall be in effect for no longer than Three (3) calendar years from the date of approval
by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. If work is underway under the terms of this contract at the
time of the expiration date, the contract expiration date shall be extended to the date for completion of
services underway. Furthermore, by mutual written agreement between the County and ENGINEER, this
contract may be extended for a period of two (2), One (1) year period(s). The total term of this contract,
including all extension periods, shall not exceed five (5) years.
B. Based upon the mutually agreed scope of work for a project, the ENGINEER shall submit to the COUNTY
an anticipated schedule for completion of each phase of the project. The ENGINEER will be required to
complete total design phase basic and additional services as required within the total allotment of time.
C. The time required by the COUNTY, or its designee or regulatory agencies, for reviews or approvals shall
be included in the allotted calendar days for Design phase and shall be considered to be included in each
project schedule. ENGINEER revisions, additions and corrections required by the COUNTY through its
review of each phase's first document submittal, shall be required as part of the work of each subsequent
phase if applicable. A time extension will not be granted during such phase for these document
modifications. Construction document revisions as required by regulatory agencies and the COUNTY
shall be accomplished by the ENGINEER within the stated period for that phase.
D. The ENGINEER shall provide construction administration services from the date of construction contract
award through the PROJECT construction period and final written acceptance of the PROJECT by the
COUNTY regardless of the project delivery method selected. For purposes of this contract, the PROJECT
shall be completed when the building(s) and related warranty work is accepted in writing by the
COUNTY.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 5

E. The ENGINEER may be required to provide reviews and reports during the one-year post construction
warranty period. The one-year period shall be in addition to the total design and construction periods of
service.
SECTION M - REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
A. Reimbursable expenses are additional compensation for Basic and Additional Services that include actual
expenditures made by the ENGINEER, his employees, or his professional consultants in the interest of the
Project and have the specific prior written approval of the COUNTY. The ENGINEER hereby agrees that
no reimbursable expense shall be incurred, nor requested for payment, without the ENGINEER having
obtained prior written approval of the COUNTY. The COUNTY is under no obligation to pay the
ENGINEER for such expenses without evidence of the COUNTY'S written consent prior to the
ENGINEER incurring such expenses. Reimbursable expenses may be approved for:
1. Printing costs by a non-COUNTY contracted printing service vendor according to Subsection C
below, if requested by the COUNTY for additional plan review sets or for bidding purposes.
2. Permit fees if levied by an authorized regulatory agency and paid directly by the ENGINEER with the
COUNTY'S permission.
3. Approved travel expenses where travel is required as part of the project scope shall be billed by
ENGINEER only for those travel expenses that are in compliance with the Federal Travel Regulation,
CFR Chapter 300-304, as applicable. All out of state travel expenses must be pre-approved by the
County in writing.
B. Costs associated with normal office supplies and equipment expenses shall not be considered as Additional
Reimbursable Expenses paid by the COUNTY as these costs shall be considered as normal overhead and
operating costs which are factored into the ENGINEER's fee. Normal overhead and operating costs shall
include but are not limited to:
1. Paper, pens, pencils, copier supplies, and computer media.
2. Drafting supplies tools & equipment.
3. Telephone and facsimile equipment, rental & toll charges.
4. Office rental, utility, and other overhead expenses.
5. Plan and specification reproduction costs for CONSULTING review purposes.
6. Postage and delivery costs.
7. Use or rental of computer equipment or related supplies.
8. Overtime work necessary to meet deadlines stipulated within the COUNTY' s Notice to Proceed.
C. Unless specifically authorized in writing in advance as part of the approve scope of work, the COUNTY
will not pay for any of the following expenses of the ENGINEER:
1. Vehicle mileage to any COUNTY-owned facility located within the State of Arizona.
2. Vehicle mileage for the ENGINEER or its sub-consultants to attend project related meetings located
within the State of Arizona.
3. Meal costs for employees of ENGINEER or its sub-consultants whether or not employees of the
COUNTY are in attendance for meetings or other gatherings related to project work for the COUNTY,
except where authorized in writing in advance for out-of-state consultants/sub-consultants traveling to
Arizona or out of state travel related to the assignment.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROO
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 6

D. Unless specifically authorized in writing, the ENGINEER shall use the COUNTY contracted printing
vendor for all reproduction work if copies are required by the COUNTY in addition to the review
document sets required elsewhere in this Agreement.
E. The ENGINEER shall accompany each payment request for Reimbursable Expenses with a copy of the
original vendor invoice for any and all Reimbursable Experise costs. The COUNTY reserves the right to
reject any and all requests for payment of Reimbursable Expenses costs where no invoice or receipt is
attached.
F. The ENGINEER shall only be paid the actual amount charged to the ENGINEER by the original vendor
for Reimbursable Expenses.
G. Refer to Exhibit "B" for hourly billing rates for ENGINEER staff and sub-consultants.
SECTION IV - COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES
A. The COUNTY shall provide the following:
1. Review of documents submitted by the ENGINEER.
2. Sufficient copies, electronic access or electronic files of all COUNTY forms required to be completed
by the ENGINEER as described in this Agreement.
3. Response to the ENGINEER's written request for decisions within a reasonable amount of time, such
time being appropriate to the request.
4. The necessary staff for consultation with the ENGINEER during program review, schematic, design
development and construction document phases in order to identify problems, needs and other
functional aspects of the PROJECT.
5. Staff for consultation with the ENGINEER and Contractor during the course of construction.
6. Periodic updates on the progress of reviews and requests for information, progress of submittals and
deliveries of equipment and furniture to be supplied by the COUNTY.
7. All required fees for securing approvals from governmental and other agencies having lawful
jurisdiction over the design of the PROJECT. The COUNTY will pay such fees directly to said
jurisdictional authorities.
B. THE CONSTRUCTION BUDGET. The COUNTY shall monitor both ENGINEER and Contractor
performance during the period of performance of the ENGINEER' s services under this Agreement. The
COUNTY's monitoring of the ENGINEER'S and Contractor's performance shall be solely for the
information of the COUNTY and shall not be construed to abridge, limit, supplement, or modify the
ENGINEER'S duties and responsibilities to provide the usual and customary basic engineering services,
including, but not limited to, the services and duties specifically described in this Agreement.
SECTION V - COMPENSATION AND PAYMENTS
A. The ENGINEER shall be compensated for contracted services that have been authorized in writing by the
COUNTY. The ENGINEER shall be compensated on an hourly fees basis in accordance with those items
listed in Exhibit B — Hourly Rates.
TERM - ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 7

B. All engineering service requests for payment shall be submitted to the COUNTY for review in electronic
format and approval and must be accompanied by a detailed invoice as required by the COUNTY. A
detailed invoice shall include copies of all related invoices and substantiating receipts; a completed SBE
reporting form; and/or other documentation for any charges incurred. Where pre-authorization is required
by the County, a copy of the written pre-authorization of the County will be included with the invoice
where those charges are submitted.
1. Invoices shall be submitted to: FMD-AccountsPayable@mail maricopa.gov with all required
supporting documentation. Invoices should not be hand-delivered, mailed or otherwise transmitted.
C. The ENGINEER's fee for contract administration services shall be due and payable monthly during the
progress of the construction work, and shall be contingent upon receipt of ENGINEER's field reports.
D. The ENGINEER shall be limited to a maximum total fee of One Million, Eight Hundred Thousand
Dollars, and no cents ($1,800,000.00) for all work on all projects assigned under this Agreement during
the term of this contract. This shall include fees for both basic, additional services, and reimbursable
expenses for all projects assigned to the ENGINEER during the term of the contract.
E. Payment for additional services as authorized by the COUNTY shall be made upon completion of the
additional services and upon receipt of a detailed invoice and request for payment.
F. If the PROJECT is abandoned or suspended in whole or in part, for a period of more than 180 days
through no fault of the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER is to be paid for the services actually performed in
accordance with ARS Section 34-104.F, but not for any services not actually performed.
G. No deductions shall be made from the ENGINEER's compensation on account of retainage withheld from
payments to Contractors.
SECTION VI- PROJECT CONSTRUCTION BUDGET AND COST ESTIMATES
A. Until such time as construction bids have been received for the PROJECT, the ENGINEER shall treat the
PROJECT Construction Budget and all estimates of construction cost as confidential information. Under
no circumstances shall the ENGINEER cause the publication of the PROJECT Construction Budget or
construction cost estimates or reveal same to anyone other than authorized COUNTY personnel.
B. To help ensure that the PROJECT is under budget, the ENGINEER shall include, as part of the bid
package, additive alternates which represent up to 10 percent of the PROJECT construction budget and do
not materially affect the basic function, operation, or design intent of the facility. The ENGINEER will
identify and make recommendations on the various alternates, but acceptance of any or all of the alternates
will be the sole responsibility of the COUNTY.
C. The successful construction bid as herein referenced, means the bid amount submitted by the Contractor
actually awarded the PROJECT by the Board of Supervisors and shall include the cost for all work
designed or specified by the ENGINEER.
D. Over-Budget Bids. In the event a PROJECT is bid and the lowest responsible bid is higher than the
COUNTY construction budget amount for the specific project, the COUNTY may reject all bids or
appropriate such additional moneys as are necessary to award the bid. In the event the COUNTY elects to
reject all bids, the COUNTY may direct the ENGINEER to revise the drawings, plans, and specifications
at no additional expense to the COUNTY in order to obtain a bid for construction not exceeding the
construction budget amount.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 8

SECTION VII- ENGINEER'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS
A. Records of the ENGINEER's direct personnel payroll, and reimbursable expense pertaining to the
PROJECT and accounts between the COUNTY and ENGINEER shall be kept on a generally recognized
accounting basis for a period of no less than nine years after final completion of the PROJECT and shall be
available to the COUNTY (on reasonable notice) for examination during normal business hours.
SECTION VIII- TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. The COUNTY and the ENGINEER hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein, except
that the COUNTY reserves the right, at its discretion, to terminate or abandon the service provided for in
this Agreement, or abandon any portion of the ENGINEER's services or portion of the PROJECT for
which services have been performed by the ENGINEER.
B. In the event the COUNTY shall abandon the services, or any part of the services, as herein provided, the
COUNTY shall notify the ENGINEER in writing, and immediately after receiving such notice, the
ENGINEER shall discontinue advancing the work under this Agreement. Notification shall be made in
writing to the ENGINEER's principal place of business.
C. Upon such termination or abandonment, the ENGINEER shall appraise the work completed and submit his
appraisal to the COUNTY for evaluation. The COUNTY shall have the right to inspect the ENGINEER's
work to appraise the work completed.
D. Except when terminated for delinquency, insolvency, or non-compliance with the terms of this Agreement,
the ENGINEER shall receive as compensation for services performed to the date of such termination, a fee
for the percentage of the ENGINEER's services as provided in this Agreement under Section V, and that
fee shall be in the amount to be agreed mutually by the ENGINEER and the COUNTY. If there is no
mutual agreement, the COUNTY will use the same method used for "Additional Services" as a guide in
the fmal determination. In no event, however, shall the fee exceed that set forth in Section VI of this
document. The ENGINEER will not be paid for any services not actually performed.
SECTION IX - OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
A. The ENGINEER may retain ownership of original drawings, plans, specifications, and related documents;
however, the COUNTY shall have ownership of the reproducible, specifications and other contract
documents as referred to in Section I, paragraph 3, and Section I, paragraph 6, which are to be delivered to
the COUNTY before the fmal payment is made to the ENGINEER. The COUNTY will not reuse, alter or
modify these reproducibles for other construction projects without first soliciting consultation from the
ENGINEER. In the event such documents are used without further consultation from the ENGINEER, the
COUNTY agrees to hold the ENGINEER harmless from any claim arising from the reuse of these
documents for subsequent construction work.
SECTION X - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. The use of words "he," "himself," "his," or other terms of masculine gender are intended to apply to both
genders, whether male or female.
B. All services provided by the ENGINEER under this Agreement shall be performed by employees, agents
or Consultants of the ENGINEER who are experienced and skilled in their profession and shall be
performed in accordance with the standards of care and workmanship in their profession. The
ENGINEER's findings, recommendations and professional advice shall be based on practices and
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. I 71079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 9

procedures customarily applied in his profession. The ENGINEER shall be solely responsible for the
completeness and accuracy of his drawings, plans, specifications, supporting data and documents prepared
or complied by either his staff or his Consultants in fulfillment of this Agreement.
C. The ENGINEER shall make no agreements with his Consultants which abridge, modify or conflict with
the requirements of this Agreement.
D. The ENGINEER shall require each Consultant, by an appropriate written agreement, of the extent of the
services to be performed by the Consultant on the PROJECT, to be bound to the ENGINEER by the terms
of this Agreement, and to assume toward the ENGINEER all the obligations and responsibilities which the
ENGINEER, by this Agreement, assumes with the COUNTY. Said agrfeement shall preserve and protect
the rights of the COUNTY under this Agreement with respect to the services to be performed by the
Consultant so that the Consulting Services thereof will not prejudice such rights and shall allow to the
Consultant, unless specifically proved otherwise in the ENGINEER-CONSULTANT agreement, the
benefits of all rights, remedies and redress against the ENGINEER, that this ENGINEER, by this
Agreement, has against the COUNTY. Where appropriate, the ENGINEER shall require each Consultant
to enter into similar agreements with his sub-consultants. The ENGINEER shall make available to each
proposed Consultant prior to the execution of the ENGINEER-CONSULTANT written agreements, copies
of this Agreement to which the Consultant will be bound by this paragraph, and identify to the Consultant
any terms and conditions of the proposed ENGINEER-CONSULTANT written agreement which may be
at variance with this Agreement. Each Consultant shall similarly make copies of this Agreement available
to his sub-consultants.
E. During the course of PROJECT construction, should any defects be revealed which would adversely affect
the appearance or function of the PROJECT and which are the result of errors, omissions, or
inconsistencies in the drawings and specifications prepared by the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall, at
his expense, modify these drawings and specifications to resolve the defective conditions to the
satisfaction of the COUNTY without additional compensation.
SECTION XI— INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
A. INDEMNIFICATION - To the fullest extent permitted by law, ENGINEER shall defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless COUNTY, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials, and employees from and
against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney fees, court costs,
expert witness fees, and the cost of appellate proceedings, relating to, arising out of, or alleged to have
resulted from the negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful acts, errors, omissions or mistakes of the
ENGINEER, his agents, representatives, employees, or consultants related to the performance of the
Contract. ENGINEER' s duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY, its agents,
representatives, officers, directors, officials, and employees shall arise in connection with any claim,
damage, loss or expense that is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease, death, or injury to,
impairment, or destruction of property, including loss of use resulting therefrom, caused by the referenced
acts, errors, omissions or mistakes in the performance of this Contract including those made by any person
for whose acts, errors, omissions or mistakes ENGINEER may be legally liable.
The amount and type of insurance coverage requirements set forth herein will in no way be construed as
limiting the scope of the indemnity in this paragraph.
B. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS - ENGINEER, at ENGINEER's own expense, shall purchase and
maintain the herein stipulated minimum insurance from a company or companies duly licensed by the
State of Arizona and possessing a current A.M. Best, Inc. rating of B++. In lieu of State of Arizona
licensing, the stipulated insurance may be purchased from a company or companies, which are authorized
to do business in the State of Arizona, provided that said insurance companies meet the approval of
COUNTY. The form of any insurance policies and forms must be acceptable to COUNTY.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. I71079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 10

1. All insurance required herein shall be maintained in full force and effect until all work or service
required to be performed under the terms of the Contract is satisfactorily completed and formally
accepted. Failure to do so may, at the sole discretion of COUNTY, constitute a material breach of this
Contract.
2. ENGINEER' s insurance shall be primary insurance as respects COUNTY, and any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by COUNTY shall not contribute to it.
3. Any failure to comply with the claim reporting provisions of the insurance policies or any breach of an
insurance policy warranty shall not affect the COUNTY'S right to coverage afforded under the
insurance policies.
4. The insurance policies may provide coverage that contains deductibles or self-insured retentions. Such
deductible and/or self-insured retentions shall not be applicable with respect to the coverage provided
to COUNTY under such policies. ENGINEER shall be solely responsible for the deductible and/or
self-insured retention and COUNTY, at its option, may require ENGINEER to secure payment of such
deductibles or self-insured retentions by a surety bond or an irrevocable and unconditional letter of
credit.
5. COUNTY reserves the right to request and to receive, within 10 working days, certified copies of any
or all of the herein required insurance policies and/or endorsements. COUNTY shall not be obligated,
however, to review such policies and/or endorsements or to advise ENGINEER of any deficiencies in
such policies and endorsements, and such receipt shall not relieve ENGINEER from, or be deemed a
waiver of COUNTY'S right to insist on strict fulfillment of ENGINEER's obligations under this
Contract.
6. The insurance policies required by this Contract, except Workers' Compensation, and Errors and
Omissions, shall name COUNTY, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials and
employees as Additional Insureds.
7. The policies required hereunder, except Workers' Compensation, and Errors and Omissions, shall
contain a waiver of transfer of rights of recovery (subrogation) against COUNTY, its agents,
representatives, officers, directors, officials and employees for any claims arising out of ENGINEER'S
work or service.
C. ENGINEER is required to procure and maintain the following coverages:
1. Commercial General Liability. Commercial General Liability insurance and, when necessary,
Commercial Umbrella insurance with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 for each occurrence,
$2,000,000 Personal/Advertising Injury, $4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate, and
$4,000,000 General Aggregate Limit. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form
property damage, and blanket contractual coverage, and shall not contain any provision that would
serve to limit third party action over claims There shall be no endorsement or modification of the
CGL limiting the scope of coverage for liability arising from explosion, collapse, or underground
property damage.
2. Automobile Liability. Commercial/Business Automobile Liability insurance and, if necessary,
Commercial Umbrella insurance with a combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage
of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence with respect to any of the ENGINEER' s owned, hired,
and non-owned vehicles assigned to or used in performance of the ENGINEER' s work or services
under this Contract.
3. Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by federal
and state statutes having jurisdiction of the ENGINEER's employees engaged in the performance of
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 11

the work or services under this Contract; and Employer's Liability insurance of not less than
$1,000,000 for each accident, $1,000,000 disease for each employee, and $1,000,000 disease policy
limit.
ENGINEER waives all rights against COUNTY and its agents, officers, directors and employees for
recovery of damages to the extent these damages are covered by the Workers' Compensation and
Employer's Liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance obtained by ENGINEER pursuant to
this Agreement.
4. Errors and Omissions (Professional Liability) Insurance. Errors and Omissions (Professional
Liability) insurance and, if necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance, which will insure and provide
coverage for errors or omissions or professional liability of the ENGINEER, with limits of no less than
$2,000,000 for each claim.
D. COVERAGES
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence
$2,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury
$4,000,000 General Aggregate
$4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations
Automotive Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence
Workers' Compensation $1,000,000 Each Accident
$1,000,000 Disease for Each Employee
$1,000,000 Disease Policy Limit
Errors and Omissions $2,000,000 Each Claim
E. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE - Prior to commencing work or services under this Contract,
ENGINEER shall furnish COUNTY with Certificates of Insurance in a foim acceptable to COUNTY, or
formal endorsements as required by the Contract in the form provided by the County, issued by
ENGINEER'S insurer(s), as evidence that policies providing the required coverages, conditions and limits
required by this Contract are in full force and effect. Such certificates shall identify this contract number
and title.
1. In the event any insurance policy(ies) required by this contract is(are) written on a "claims made"
basis, coverage shall extend for two years past completion and acceptance of ENGINEER'S work or
services and as evidenced by annual Certificates of Insurance.
2. If a policy does expire during the life of the Contract, a renewal certificate must be sent to COUNTY
fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration date.
F. CANCELLATION AND EXPIRATION NOTICE - Insurance required herein shall not expire, be
canceled, or materially changed without thirty (30) days prior written notice to COUNTY.
SECTION XII - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
A. The COUNTY and the ENGINEER each binds himself, his partners, successors, assigns, and legal
representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns, and covenants
of this Agreement. Neither the COUNTY nor the ENGINEER shall assign, sublet, or transfer his interest
in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. In no event shall any contractual relation be
created by this Agreement between any third party and the COUNTY. In the event ENGINEER changes
the name of the firm to which this contract has been awarded, it is incumbent upon ENGINEER to request
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 12

COUNTY through the Procurement Officer to prepare the appropriate agreement to reflect the
ENGINEER's name change. In the event ENGINEER chooses not to change its name for work
accomplished through this awarded contract, ENGINEER will issue all payments on the letterhead of the
firm contracted with the COUNTY under this contract. Failure to comply may result in the invoices of
ENGINEER being refused, which will result in a delay of payment to ENGINEER at no additional cost to
COUNTY.
SECTION XHI - NO KICK-BACK
A. The ENGINEER warrants that no person has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this Agreement
upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, and that
no member of the Board of Supervisors, or any employee of Maricopa County has any interest, financial or
otherwise with the ENGINEER and his firm.
B. For breach or violation of this warrant, Maricopa County shall have the right to annul this Agreement
without liability, or at its discretion to deduct from the Agreement prior to consideration, the full amount
of such commission, percentage, brokerage, and contingent fee.
1. This Agreement and its Notice to Proceed and any addendums thereto shall be subject to ARS Section
38-511.
SECTION )(IV - NONDISCRIMINATION, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, &
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES; SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY
A. This Contract is made in accordance with and subject to the provision of all applicable laws, statutes,
ordinances, rules, regulations, executive orders and codes. To the extent required by applicable law, each
party hereto shall comply and require its Subcontractors and suppliers to comply with all then applicable
federal, state of Arizona and local nondiscrimination laws, rules, regulations, ordinances and executive
orders, including, without limitation, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as they may be amended, modified, codified, supplemented
or repealed from time to time.
B. It is Maricopa County's policy to provide Small Business Enterprises (SBE) with the opportunity to
participate in the County's solicitation process and to be considered to fulfill the requirements for various
commodities and services. This contract has no requirement for utilization of SBEs, however it does
require that utilization of SBE firms by ENGINEER be reported for tracking by the County. A full
description of the County's SBE program and the contractual requirements are attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference in Exhibit C.
C. CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all provisions and requirements of Arizona Executive Order 2009-
09 including flow down of all provisions and requirements to any subcontractors. Executive Order 2009-
09 supersedes Executive order 99-4 and amends Executive order 75-5 and may be viewed and downloaded
at the Governor of the State of Arizona's website
http://www.azgovernor.govidms/upload/E0 2009 09.pdf which is hereby incorporated into this contract
as if set forth in full herein. During the performance of this contract, CONTRACTOR shall not
discriminate against any employee, client or any or any other individual in any way because of that
person's age, race, creed, color, religion, sex, disability or national origin.
SECTION XV - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
A. ENGINEER is an independent ENGINEER under this Agreement. Services provided by ENGINEER
pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the supervision of ENGINEER. In providing such services,
neither ENGINEER nor its agents shall act as officers, employees, or agents of the COUNTY. This
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. I71079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 13

Agreement shall not constitute or make the parties a partnership or joint venture. The COUNTY is not
responsible for any debt, default, act or omission of the ENGINEER.
SECTION XVI - CONFLICTS
A. Neither ENGINEER nor its employees shall have or hold any continuing or frequently recurring
employment or contractual relationship that is substantially antagonistic or incompatible with
ENGINEER' s loyal and conscientious exercise of judgment related to its performance under this
Agreement.
B. ENGINEER agrees that none of its officers or employees shall, during the term of this Agreement, serve as
an expert witness against COUNTY in any legal or administrative proceeding in which he or she is not a
party, unless compelled by court process. Further, ENGINEER agrees that such persons shall not give
sworn testimony or issue a report or writing, as an expression of his or her expert opinion, which is adverse
or prejudicial to the interests of COUNTY in connection with any such pending or threatened legal or
administrative proceeding. The limitations of this section shall not preclude ENGINEER or any other
persons from representing themselves in any action or in any administrative or legal proceeding.
C. In the event ENGINEER is permitted to utilize sub-consultants to perform any services required by this
Agreement, ENGINEER agrees to prohibit such sub-consultants, by written contract, from having any
conflicts within the meaning of this section.
SECTION XVH - CONTINGENCY FEE
A. ENGINEER warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for ENGINEER, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or
agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee
working solely for ENGINEER, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent
upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For a breach or violation of this
provision, COUNTY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability at its discretion, or
to deduct from the Agreement price or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission,
percentage, gift or consideration.
SECTION XVIII - MATERIALITY AND WAIVER OF BREACH
A. COUNTY and ENGINEER agree that each requirement, duty, and obligation set forth herein is substantial
and important to the formation of this Agreement and, therefore, is a material term hereof.
B. COUNTY'S failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such
provision or modification of this Agreement. A waiver of any breach of a provision of this Agreement
shall not be deem a waiver of any subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the
terms of this Agreement.
SECTION XIX - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
A. ENGINEER shall comply with all federal state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, rules, and regulations in
performing its duties, responsibilities, and obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROO
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 14

SECTION XX - SEVERANCE
A. In the event a portion of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the
remaining provisions shall continue to be effective unless COUNTY or ENGINEER elects to terminate
this Agreement. An election to terminate this Agreement based upon this provision shall be made within
seven (7) days after the finding by the court becomes final.
SECTION XXI - JOINT PREPARATION
A. The parties acknowledge that they have sought and received whatever competent advice and counsel as
was necessary for them to form a full and complete understanding of all rights and obligations herein and
that the preparation of this Agreement has been their joint effort. The language agreed to expresses their
mutual intent and the resulting document shall not, solely as a matter of judicial construction, be construed
more severely against one of the parties than the other.
SECTION XXII - PRIORITY OF PROVISIONS
A. If there is a conflict or inconsistency between any term, statement, requirement, or provision of any exhibit
attached hereto, any document or events referred to herein, or any document incorporated into this
Agreement by reference and a term, statement, requirement, or provision of this Agreement, the term,
statement, requirement, or provision contained in this Agreement shall prevail and be given effect.
SECTION XXIII - APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE
A. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the
State of Arizona. Venue for litigation or any proceedings concerning this Agreement shall be in Maricopa
County, Arizona.
SECTION XXIV - AMENDMENTS
A. No modification, amendment, or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective
unless contained in a written document prepared with the same or similar formality as this Agreement and
executed by the COUNTY and ENGINEER.
B. All amendments to this Contract shall be in writing and approved/signed by both parties. Maricopa County
Office of Procurement Services shall be responsible for approving all amendments for Maricopa County
SECTION XXV - PRIOR AGREEMENTS
A. This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations,
agreements, and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree that there
are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that
are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof
shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further
agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be
effective unless set forth in writing in accordance with Section XXIV above.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 15

SECITON XXVI - DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
A. It is a requirement of COUNTY that it enter into contracts only with firms that certify the establishment of
a drug free work place. Execution of this Agreement by ENGINEER shall serve, as ENGINEER' s
required certification that it either has or that it will establish a drug free work place.
SECTION XXVII - INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
A. The truth and accuracy of each "Whereas" clause set forth herein is acknowledged by the parties. The
attached Exhibits are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement.
SECTION XXVIII - LEGAL WORKER REQUIREMENTS
A. As required by Arizona Revised Statutes §41-4401, the COUNTY is prohibited after September 30, 2008
from awarding a contract to any service or construction ENGINEER who fails, or whose sub-contractors
fail, to comply with Arizona Revised Statutes § 23-214-A. The ENGINEER warrants that it complies fully
with all federal immigration laws and regulations that relate to its employees, that it shall verify, through
the employment verification pilot program as jointly administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security and the Social Security Administration or any of its successor programs, the employment
eligibility of each employee hired after December 31, 2007, and that it shall require its sub-contractors and
sub-sub-contractors to provide the same warranties to the ENGINEER. The ENGINEER acknowledges
that a breach of this warranty by ENGINEER or by any sub-contractor or sub-sub-contractor under this
Contract shall be deemed a material breach of this Contract, and is grounds for penalties, including
termination of this Contract, by Maricopa County. Maricopa County retains the right to inspect the records
of any ENGINEER, sub-contractor and sub-sub-contractor employee who performs work under this
Contract, and to conduct random verification of the employment records of the ENGINEER and any sub-
contractor and sub-sub-contractor who works on this Contract, to ensure that the ENGINEER and each
sub-contractor and sub-sub-contractor is complying with the warranties set forth above. ENGINEER shall
be responsible for all costs associated with compliance with this requirement.
SECTION XXV( — ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A — Project Services
Exhibit B — Hourly Rates
Exhibit C — SBE Reporting Form
Exhibit D — Legal Worker Statement (from Statement of Qualifications)
Exhibit E — Alternative Dispute Resolution
SECTION XXX - NOTICES
Notices: All notice to be given hereunder shall be in writing, and may be given by depositing the same
in the United States mail addressed to the party to be notified, postpaid, return receipt requested or by
delivering the same n person to such party with written receipt of acknowledgement of delivery by a
person at the address(s) set forth below. All notices to be given to the parties hereto shall be sent to or
made to the addresses shown below. The place for giving notice shall remain the same as set forth
herein unless changed in the manner provided in this Section.
Whenever either party desires to give notice to the other, such notice must be in writing, sent by
certified United States mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or by hand-delivery with a
request for a written receipt of acknowledgment of delivery, addressed to the party for whom it is
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 16

intended at the place last specified. The place for giving notice shall remain the same as set forth
herein until changed in writing in the manner provided in this Section. For the present, the parties
designate the following:
Rich Wegele, Director
Maricopa County, Facilities Management Depar turent
401 West Jefferson St
Phoenix, AZ 85003
AND
Kevin Tyne, Chief Procurement Officer
Office of Procurement Services
Maricopa County
320 W. Lincoln Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
AND TO DESIGN PROFESSIONAL:
Byron Torgersen, P.E., Principal
Van Boerum & Frank Associates, Inc.
1602 S. Priest Dr., Suite 103
Tempe, AZ 85281
SECTION VOCI - CLAIMS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION
A. Notice Prior to Execution of Work. If the ENGINEER wishes to make Claim for any increase in the
Project Cost, written notice must be given before proceeding to execute the Work. Prior notice is not
required for Claims relating to an emergency endangered life or property. If the ENGINEER believes
additional cost is involved for reasons including but not limited to (1) a written interpretation from the
design, an order by the OWNER to stop the Work where the ENGINEER was not at fault, (2) other
reasonable grounds, a Claim shall be filed in accordance with this Section.
B. Fourteen Days After Occurrence. If the ENGINEER wishes to make a Claim for an increase in the
Project Cost, the ENGINEER shall give the OWNER written notice thereof within fourteen (14) days
after the occurrence of the event giving rise to such Claim or within fourteen (14) days after the
ENGINEER should have recognized, in the exercise of due diligence, the condition giving rise to such
Claim. The ENGINEER shall provide such notice before proceeding to perform the Work. Any
Claim with respect to an emergency shall be made not later than five (5) days after occurrence of the
emergency as to which the Work was performed.
C. Waiver of Claim for Additional Cost. Failure to give notice of a Claim for an increase Project Cost in
strict compliance with the requirements of this Section shall constitute a waiver of such Claim.
D. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided elsewhere in the Contract, the alternative dispute
resolution ("ADR") process provided for in as Exhibit E (attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference) shall be the exclusive means for resolution of claims or disputes arising under this
Contract.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 1 710 79-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 17

SECTION VOCII - CONTRACT EXECUTION
This Agreement shall be in full force and effect only when the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County,
Arizona has approved it, and when executed by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and date first above
written, in counterparts, each of which shall without proof or accounting for the other counterparts, be deemed
an original Contract.
SECTION XXXIII - ISRAEL BOYCOTT:
By submitting this proposal the Contractor certifies that they are in compliance with Article 9, Arizona
Revised Statutes Section 35-393 et. seq..
TERM - ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 18

Term Electrical Engineering Services
171079-ROQ
7
Date
[NA VA NV /WM c‘l D-A3-")7 1-1,K
. Firm Name Federal Tax Identification Number
VVA (W/ 414/L 92531
Printed Name NIGP Commodity Code (Advantage)
Net
Vendor Payment Terms
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA
RECOMMENDED BY: ACCEPTED AND APPROVED:
Department Head Date Chairman, Board of Supervisors Date
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board Date
LEGAL REVIEW:
Approved as to form and within the powers
and authority granted under the laws of the
State of Arizona to Maricopa County.
By:
Deputy County Attorney
Date:
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROO
Term Electrical Engineering Set-vices Page 19

VANBOER-01 $BARKER
GP • DATE (MM/DDIYYYY)
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
08/18/2017
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on
this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER CONTACT Shauna Barker
,111AME1.-
American Insurance & Investment Corp. PHONE !Arc, ta, E (801) 364-3434 643 8°1) 356-5234
448 South 400 East R844,46s, Shauna.Barker@ainericart-ins.cornt16' i N6)4
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
wsueseisi,FForiows covseAGE NAIC #
t INSURER A Charter Oak Fire Ins Co
INSURED iNsuRFR e :Travelers Indemnity Company gA§§4
Van Boerum & Frank Associates 1 INSURER C Travelers Cas & Surety Company 19038
Attn: Mike Mooney INSURER 0 :Travelers Cas & Surety Co Amer 31194
330 South 300 East
Salt Lake City, UT 84111 INSURER E
INSURER F :
- — VISION NUMBER
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WI-IICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. „. . LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS,
INSIT - TYPE OF INSURANCE ..ito ADDASUBRt weD, _ POLICY NUMBER T : atimptyYwY1 POI-ICY EFF ttmunptyyyyl POLICY EXP 1 1 LIMITS
A X I COMMERCIAL GENERAL ,..... LIABILITY i . . I I ,. EACH OCCURRENCE . 1,000,000
1 I , bA0,4,,,3p I:, P, I i; i E I, 1,000,000
CLAIMS -MADE 1 -X1 OCCUR X x 6806H724614 12/3112016 12/31/2017 ? . 0.,- ..E.L;11,1.: . - -., - -- tt .a.c::..cturrenceti '
---- , 6,000
X Hired and Non I . LIED 1t.)..p (tea one pomrtms,
X Owned AUTO - .. _ i PERSONAL& ADV IWURY 1,006,60
GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: 1 GENERAL AGGREGATE 2,000,000
: 2000 ,, 000
POLICY 1}0 1AR, LOC ' PRODUCTS - COMP1OP AGO . S
I E
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY I . IF-0-17C.C4d01) CICINI:0 nINGLit LIMIT ., 1 1 $
ANY AUTO 1 130DiLY INJURY (Per person d 1
AUTOS OWNED ONLY AUTOS SCHEDULED i Prg-t:t y INJURY RY (per accident) 1 S
_ Val ONLY . _..._ WAWA?, 1 urer .t7',Iik,!:4CO'ickYfaib:::-------1--- .- acc:cleoli. - DAMAGE -- s
t
B X UMBRELLA MAE X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE 5,000,000
EXCESS LIAB CLA1MS-MADE CUP7911Y622 1 I 12/3112016 12131/2017 I fq-,.kp , 3(-senT _. ., .. .... 5,000,066
I
D ' E D , i X 1 RETENTIONS I 0,000 . .
C 1WORKERS COMPENSATION I t X i rjT1 1Tp t , t i 0TH- PP
1 IAND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY 'WI x U83215T735 I , 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 - 1,000,000
.IY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE I . ,.t I N /A E.L EACH ACCIDENT
titigigNiffill EXCLUDED? I N 1,000,000
E L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under 1,000,000
1 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS belt) ' EL DISEASE -FDLICY LIMIT $
D -Prof Liab Claim Made 106398206 i 0112712017 01/2712018 Per Claim Limit 5,000,000
0 Retro Date: NIA 106398206 . 01/27/2017 01/27/2018 Aggregate Limit 6,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS! LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Acme 101, Additional Remarks Schedule may be attached if me a space la required)
CERTIFICATE DER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
Insurance Verification Only ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
ACORD 25 (2016/03) .0 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

EXHIBIT A - PROJECT SERVICES
Facilities Management Department
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
3 YEAR TERM
ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT
SERIAL # 171079-ROQ
CONTRACT NO.: 171079-ROQ
I - GENERAL
A. This exhibit lists the range of requirements, which may become part of any PROJECT for which the
ENGINEER provides professional services. The actual service requirements will vary with each
PROJECT. The ENGINEER and COUNTY will meet and review the scope of work for each PROJECT
completed under terms of this contract and the COUNTY will identify which services it requires of the
ENGINEER. Based upon the scope of work and the required services the ENGINEER shall prepare his
proposal, which shall include a design phase schedule. That schedule shall include: design by phases;
owner and stakeholder responses thereto (included in the times set); and permitting. The schedule will
then be updated and delivered electronically every two (2) weeks.
B. All services listed herein may not be required for a project completed by the ENGINEER. The COUNTY
reserves the right to request additional services not listed here from the ENGINEER if required to
complete the work, and to direct that any listed services not be performed.
C. ENGINEER shall send documents that are to be delivered to the COUNTY to the COUNTY's contract
vendor for printing, unless otherwise approved in writing by the COUNTY. The COUNTY will be billed
directly for these printing costs.
- PRE-DESIGN SERVICES PHASE
A. The ENGINEER shall work with the Owner to develop a scope of work, phases, schedule and budget for a
specific project. These services shall include programming, space schematics and flow diagrams, survey
of existing facilities, marketing studies, economic feasibility studies, project financing studies, etc. The
ENGINEER shall incorporate COUNTY space and graphic standards, and shall develop a program for a
specific project.
B. After completion of the pre-design services, the ENGINEER shall present these documents to the
COUNTY for review, comments, and approval. The COUNTY shall have the right to make changes on
review at no cost to the COUNTY as long as the original PROJECT scope is not materially affected
C. The ENGINEER shall present, at the request of the COUNTY, the pre-design documents to the Maricopa
County Facilities Management Department Review Committee and/or County Board of Supervisors.
HI - SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE
A. The ENGINEER shall provide a preliminary evaluation of the program requirements and the PROJECT
budget constraints, each in terms of the other, then review with the COUNTY any inconsistencies evident
between these program requirements and the budgetary limitations.
B. Based upon the mutually agreed PROJECT program and budget requirements, the ENGINEER shall
prepare schematic design studies leading to the recommended design concept together with a general
description of the PROJECT in terms of its scale and interrelationship of parts. The ENGINEER shall
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 20

submit four (4) sets of prints and an electronic copy of these documents to the COUNTY with a written
construction cost estimate based upon a current area, volume, or other unit cost criterion. Upon request the
ENGINEER shall provide the COUNTY, one (1) set of schematic design documents as revised by the
ENGINEER to incorporate COUNTY requested changes at the end of each respective design phase. The
schematic design documents will be in a pdf format acceptable to the COUNTY.
C. After completion of the schematic design studies and construction cost estimates, the ENGINEER shall
present these studies and estimates to the COUNTY for review, comment, and approval. The COUNTY
shall have the right to make changes on review at no cost to the COUNTY as long as the original
PROJECT scope is not materially affected.
D. The ENGINEER shall present, at the request of the COUNTY, the schematic design and construction cost
estimates to the Maricopa County Facilities Management Department Review Committee and/or County
Board of Supervisors.
IV - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE
A. After the schematic design studies and construction cost estimates are approved by the COUNTY and the
ENGINEER is so advised in writing by the COUNTY, the ENGINEER shall prepare from the approved
schematic design studies the design development documents and other criteria as may be appropriate.
B. The ENGINEER shall design the PROJECT so that the construction will confoun to the requirements of
Title 34, Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) regulating Public Buildings and Improvements as well as other
applicable laws, codes, and regulations.
C. The ENGINEER shall submit to the COUNTY a second construction cost estimate of the PROJECT and
of its major components based on the design development drawings and plans.
D. After completion of the design development phase and construction cost estimates, the ENGINEER shall
deliver four (4) sets of Design Development documents and outline specifications to the COUNTY for
review, comment, and approval. The Design Development Documents will be in a pdf format acceptable
to the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall have the right to make changes on review at no additional cost
provided that the previously approved design development phase concept is not materially affected by
these changes. Upon request, the ENGINEER shall provide the COUNTY, one (1) set of design
development documents as revised by the ENGINEER to incorporate COUNTY requested changes at the
end of each respective design phase.
V - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE
A. After the design development documents and construction cost estimates have been approved by the
COUNTY and the ENGINEER has been so advised in writing by the COUNTY, the ENGINEER shall
prepare, from the approved design development documents, construction drawings, plans, and
specifications setting forth in detail the work required, and shall assist in the drafting of the Form of
Proposal for the construction contract.
B. The ENGINEER and his consultants shall prepare all drawings for the PROJECT utilizing AutoCAD.
The drawings shall conform to the "CAD Layer Guidelines" established by the COUNTY. Project
Manuals shall be prepared utilizing Microsoft Word. When requested by the COUNTY, the ENGINEER
shall deliver four (4) sets of 50% complete Construction Documents and project manuals for review and
comment by the COUNTY. The Construction Documents shall be in a pdf format acceptable to the
COUNTY.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 21

C. The ENGINEER shall prepare his drawings according to generally accepted practice, COUNTY
standards, and as defined by the "A/E Standard Operating Procedures Manual". The ENGINEER shall
include the General and Supplementary Conditions and General Requirements as required by the
COUNTY and as provided by the COUNTY.
D. The ENGINEER shall inform the COUNTY in writing of any adjustments to previous construction cost
estimates as indicated by changes in scope, requirements, or market conditions during the course of the
PROJECT.
E. The ENGINEER shall file the required Construction documents to secure approval of all governmental
authorities having jurisdiction over the design of the PROJECT. All filing and plans approval fees shall be
paid directly by the COUNTY. The ENGINEER shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local
laws, codes, and regulations in effect at the time the construction contract documents (plans and
specifications) are submitted for regulatory approval. The ENGINEER shall be responsible for corrections
as required to comply with applicable laws, codes, and regulations at no additional cost to the COUNTY.
F. The ENGINEER shall submit two (2) sets of final design calculations, including structural, mechanical,
electrical, and plumbing, and four (4) sets of "Construction Documents" including Project Manuals for
review and approval to the COUNTY. The time required by the ENGINEER to make corrections to the
plans requested by the COUNTY or required by regulatory agencies is considered part of his total contract
time.
G. No later than 14 calendar days following submittal of "Construction Documents" to the COUNTY, the
ENGINEER shall submit a final construction cost estimate to the COUNTY, itemized by major categories
of work broken down according to the Construction Specification Institution's sixteen division standard.
H. After completion of the "Construction Documents" and after review by the COUNTY, the ENGINEER
shall, if requested by the COUNTY, present all documents to the Maricopa County Facilities Management
Department Review Committee and/or County Board of Supervisors.
VI- QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
A. The COUNTY shall review ENGINEER'S preparation of plans and specifications at the conclusion of
each of the design phases. The ENGINEER shall provide such information as the COUNTY may require
regarding the ENGINEER's design and selection of materials and equipment. ENGINEER shall provide, at
the COUNTY'S request, such data and information as COUNTY may require regarding ENGINEER'S
estimate of probable construction cost for the PROJECT.
B. The COUNTY will review a Constructability and Value Engineering report prepared by the ENGINEER at
the completion of Schematic Design, Design Development and 50% of Construction Documents phases.
C. Within ten (10) days after the receipt of a Notice to Proceed, the ENGINEER shall provide the COUNTY
with a plan for Quality Assurance/Quality Control of the professional services the ENGINEER shall
provide for the PROJECT. The Quality Assurance/Quality Control plan shall be in accordance with the
"A/E Standard Operating Procedures Manual" and be executed through all phases of PROJECT work. The
ENGINEER shall be solely responsible for carrying out the Quality Assurance/Quality Control plan for the
PROJECT, the objective of which shall be to prevent errors and omissions in the plans and specifications
and other documents prepared by the ENGINEER. The COUNTY will monitor the ENGINEER's
implementation of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control plan, but the COUNTY will not be responsible
for the ENGINEER's failure to carry out the Quality Assurance/Quality Control plan nor for the accuracy
and quality of the ENGINEER's services. The ENGINEER shall maintain all quality control records for a
minimum of five (5) years following the date of substantial completion of the PROJECT. The COUNTY's
rights to examine such records shall not be construed to confer upon COUNTY a duty to check or examine
TERM - ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 22

such records, as the Quality Assurance/Quality Control plan and its documentation is the sole
responsibility of the ENGINEER.
D. Failure by the ENGINEER or his consultants to incorporate COUNTY or regulatory agency comments
into his plans shall constitute an error or omission on the part of the ENGINEER and the cost of any
necessary corrective action is to be borne by ENGINEER.
VH - BIDDING PHASE
A. Upon approval of the final "Construction Documents", including drawings, specifications, and other
contract documents, and upon issuance of a call for construction bids, the ENGINEER shall send
documents to COUNTY' s contract vendor. The COUNTY' s contract vendor shall be responsible for
printing and distribution of bid sets to contractors and bidding services. At the option of the COUNTY,
the ENGINEER may be responsible for the distribution of sets of bidding documents and shall collect a
deposit prior to release of any set, conditional upon the return of the bidding documents in reusable
condition.
B. The ENGINEER shall review all submittals from contractors or suppliers for requested substitutions. The
ENGINEER shall review all drawings, samples and various other submittals to determine compliance with
the PROJECT plans and specifications. If the ENGINEER determines that a substitution meets the
specifications, the ENGINEER shall forward the request to the COUNTY with his recommendations. The
ENGINEER shall then publish in an addendum, a listing all prior approval substitutions approved by both
the ENGINEER and COUNTY not less than seven (7) days prior to the opening of bids. Failure by the
ENGINEER or his consultants to incorporate COUNTY comments, adequately evaluate substitutions and
issue the addenda according to statutory requirements shall constitute an error or omission on the part of
the ENGINEER and the cost of any necessary corrective action is to be borne by ENGINEER.
C. The ENGINEER shall prepare and distribute addenda as required.
D. The ENGINEER shall prepare the agenda and conduct a PROJECT pre-bid meeting for potential bidders
to encourage competent, competitive bids and to clarify any contractor questions about the PROJECT. At
this meeting the ENGINEER shall discuss the PROJECT scope of work, the contract documents, including
any addenda. The ENGINEER shall record minutes of the pre-bid meeting and forward a record of the
meeting to the COUNTY within three (3) working days after the pre-bid meeting.
E. BID OPENING - The ENGINEER shall attend the bid opening(s) for the PROJECT and upon receipt of
all bids, (if requested by the COUNTY) shall review and analyze same for the purpose of advising the
COUNTY as to the validity and completeness of bids, the resolution of any problems or inquiries
associated with the bidding process and the ENGINEER's recommendations as to which Contractors are
eligible and qualified to perform the work. The ENGINEER (if requested by the COUNTY) shall also
advise the COUNTY which if any, of the low bid Contractors should or should not be awarded contracts to
perform the work and shall appropriately justify this advice.
F. OVERBUDGET BIDS - In the event a PROJECT is bid and the lowest responsible bid is more than 10%
over the ENGINEER' s estimate, the COUNTY may reject all bids or appropriate such additional moneys
as are necessary to award the bid. In the event the COUNTY elects to reject all bids, the COUNTY shall
direct the ENGINEER to redesign the PROJECT and re-bid the project, without additional fee.
VIII- CONSTRUCTION PHASE
A. The ENGINEER shall prepare the agenda, attend and assist the COUNTY in conducting the
pre-construction conference with the successful bidder. The ENGINEER shall record the pre-construction
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 23

meeting and forward a written record of the meeting minutes to the COUNTY within three (3) working
days.
B. At the pre-construction conference the ENGINEER shall deliver to the COUNTY three (3) sets of posted
plans and specifications for the project. Two (2) sets shall be for other COUNTY use and one (1) set shall
remain in the construction office for use by the COUNTY and ENGINEER during the course of
construction.
C. The ENGINEER shall have access to the work on the PROJECT in normal business hours after proper
notice to the Contractor whenever the work is in preparation or progress. At all times, proper safety
precautions shall be taken by the ENGINEER.
D. The ENGINEER shall review and make recommendations to the COUNTY on all claims made by the
Contractor and on all other matters relating to the execution and progress of the work and regarding the
interpretation of the construction contract documents.
E. The ENGINEER shall timely review all shop drawings, samples and various other submittals to determine
compliance with the PROJECT plans and specifications. If the ENGINEER determines that a substitution
is required, the ENGINEER shall forward the request to the COUNTY with his recommendations. The
ENGINEER shall advise the COUNTY upon the rejection of any submittal item and provide to the
COUNTY an analysis that reflects the effect of such rejection upon the projects critical path and project
execution. As to submittals, ENGINEER will review submittals for items specifically mentions in the
Specifications. Responses shall be made within not less than fourteen (14) days after submittals are
received.
F. The ENGINEER shall prepare Proposal Requests and shall forward the proposal, together with the reason
and justification for the change, the evaluation of options to the proposed change, his recommendations
and evaluation of associated costs and effects upon the construction schedule to the COUNTY.
G. The ENGINEER shall review Change Order requests (if requested by the Owner) and shall forward the
proposed Change Order, together with his final recommendations to the COUNTY.
H. The ENGINEER shall respond to requests for information and shall issue such ENGINEER's
Supplemental Instructions, AIA Document G710, as are required for the clarification of the construction
contract documents and to expedite construction of the PROJECT. ALL SUPPLEMENTAL
INSTRUCTIONS AND FIELD ORDERS MUST HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY. RFI' s
shall be submitted in numerical order, with no breaks in consecutive numbering. Each page of any
attachments to an RFI shall bear the RFI number. All RFI's should be submitted by e-mail. RFI's
requesting information already in the Contract Documents may be returned as frivolous. RFI's shall not be
utilized to approve submittals or substitutions nor to request Task Order Modifications or Change Orders,
RFI's shall be responded to within seven (7) days of being received, referencing the RFI number.
I. The ENGINEER of record and the Consultants of record and their designated representatives shall make
periodic site visits for the purpose of determining general compliance with the approved PROJECT plans
and specifications.
1. The frequency of these periodic visits shall be determined by the particular work being performed and
their relationship to critical events including but not limited to: major system start-up's, and items of
normal building inspection procedures, particularly work that will be covered or concealed. Additional
attention shall be given and reported on construction items concealed later as PROJECT work
progresses.
2. All site visits shall be conducted by the appropriate professional discipline for the work in progress.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROO
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 24

3. All visits shall be documented by dated reports on the ENGINEER's Field Report, AIA Document
G711. Problems requiring action by the ENGINEER or his consultants shall also be recorded, dated,
and appended to the Field Report. Copies shall be forwarded to the COUNTY weekly.
4. It is considered important that the quality of work to be later concealed be observed and documented
on a regular basis. Any deviations from the approved PROJECT plans and specifications shall be
brought to the attention of the Contractor and the COUNTY.
5. The ENGINEER shall review the plans maintained at the site by the Contractor for notion of "as-built"
construction and report to the COUNTY on the progress of the Contractor's change notation work
monthly with each request for payment.
6. The ENGINEER shall review the contractors shop drawing log, the progress of submittals and the
completeness and accuracy of his as-built noted plans.
J. The ENGINEER shall review all Contractor payment requests and receipts for stored materials and certify
that to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, based on what his observations have revealed,
the quality and quantity of the work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. As part of each
payment application review the ENGINEER shall review the as-built drawings to confirm they are current
and notify the Owner of their status.
K. The ENGINEER and OWNER shall review materials testing reports required by the construction
documents prior to filing. The ENGINEER shall review with the COUNTY and direct corrective work in
all instances where these reports indicate materials failure to meet specifications.
L. The ENGINEER shall prepare Certificates of Substantial Completion and Final Completion when
appropriate. The ENGINEER shall conduct inspections and, subject to the COUNTY approval, determine
the Date of Substantial Completion and Final Completion and enter such date on the Certificate.
M. The ENGINEER will create the punch list upon Substantial Completion and review the performances of
the items to assure their having been completed.
IX - ENGINEERS REQUIRED ADDITIONAL SERVICES
A. The following items represent additional services of the ENGINEER that may be required on a PROJECT.
Upon the request by the COUNTY, the ENGINEER shall submit costs for requested additional services.
The ENGINEER is not to proceed with any additional services without written approval from the
COUNTY.
B. Upon request of the COUNTY, the ENGINEER shall maintain a competent full-time person at the Project
Site to monitor job progress and for conformance of materials and construction with the Contract
Documents for this new facility. The ENGINEER's full-time representative shall be an experienced
Arizona Registered ENGINEER suitable to the COUNTY who shall be present at the Project Site a
minimum of forty (40) hours per week and when any work by the contractor or his subcontractors is being
performed except for Arizona State authorized holiday periods. The ENGINEER' s office staff as required
shall support this resident observer.
1. A resume of this full-time representative shall be furnished to the COUNTY for review and approval.
This observer shall attend all progress meetings at which the COUNTY, ENGINEER, General
Contractor, and Subcontractors can discuss jointly job procedures, progress, problems, and scheduling.
2. The observer shall maintain at the Project Site, on a current basis, contract records, supplemental
instructions, records of all necessary contract, approved drawings and specifications, samples,
materials maintenance and operating manuals and instructions, and other construction related
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. I71079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 25

documents, including all revisions thereto. He shall obtain from the Contractor a current set of record
drawings, specifications and operating manuals at the completion of the PROJECT. The ENGINEER
shall see that all record items are delivered to the COUNTY.
3. The observer will issue weekly field reports, electronically submitted to the COUNTY.
4. The period of service for the observer shall be based on an established construction period of time.
Should it appear that construction work would carry beyond the contracted period of service, an
additional service must be authorized by the COUNTY in writing to extend observer's services.
X - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL(s)
A. Upon request of the COUNTY, as a condition for Substantial Completion, the ENGINEER shall review
comprehensive Operation and Maintenance Manual for the PROJECT and warranties.
B. The ENGINEER shall be responsible for the timely completion of these items so as not to delay his work
under this Agreement.
C. The Contractor coordinate and conduct all required, training sessions as required by the COUNTY to fully
explain and understand the safe operation and maintenance of the system. The ENGINEER shall ensure
the proper inclusion and coordination by the Contractor of all required factory training aids and sessions,
written guarantees, bonds, warranties, parts lists, spare parts, extra materials, replacement materials,
operating manuals, and maintenance manuals, and all operating and maintenance audio and visual
instructional and training materials shall be delivered to the COUNTY. All training sessions shall be
recorded by the ENGINEER on a media approved by the COUNTY.
D. POST-CONSTRUCTION WARRANTY - Upon request of the COUNTY, the ENGINEER shall assist
the COUNTY in conducting a post-construction inspection at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of
the two-year post-construction warranty period as required in the ENGINEER prepared Contract
Documents, making diligent efforts to identify all deficiencies and warranty-related problems and provide
a report on all faults noted and discovered during the inspection to the COUNTY and Contractor at least
forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration of the two-year warranty period. The ENGINEER shall provide
monthly updates of this report, and such reports shall be continued on a monthly basis past the expiration
of the two-year warranty period until the Contractor has corrected all items noted on the post anniversary
inspection report.
E. RECORD DRAWINGS — Upon request of the COUNTY, the ENGINEER shall prepare record drawings
separately for the PROJECT, except that buried underground utilities must be shown as "As-Built" and
certified as such with the signature of the Contractor's Superintendent. The ENGINEER's Construction
Documents shall include this certification requirement. The record drawings shall be in CAD and pdf
formats.
F. If requested by the COUNTY, the ENGINEER shall retain the services of an Arizona registered
professional engineer to prepare the necessary plans and specifications for a fire sprinkler system for the
PROJECT. The design shall include pipe types and sizes, valve types and sizes and all notations necessary
to construct a complete system. The plans will be prepared for the purposes of competitive bidding.
G. When the following services cause the ENGINEER extra expense and when authorized in writing prior to
performance of such work, these services will be paid for as an "Additional Service."
1. Revising previously approved drawings or specifications to accomplish changes requested by the
COUNTY.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. I71079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 26

2. Preparing documents for supplemental construction work initiated after commencement of the
construction phase not caused by the errors or omissions of the ENGINEER.
3. Consultation concerning replacement of any work damaged by fire, flood and other natural causes
during construction and furnishing professional services as may be required in connection with the
replacement of such work.
4. Arranging for the work to proceed should the Contractor default due to delinquency or insolvency
H. The ENGINEER shall be compensated for additional services, when authorized in writing prior to
performance of such services. Hourly fee compensation shall be in accordance with Exhibit B— Hourly
Rate.
I. It is distinctly understood and agreed that no claims for additional compensation will be allowed by the
COUNTY except as provided herein, nor shall the ENGINEER perform any work or furnish any materials
not covered by this Agreement. Such work or materials furnished by the ENGINEER without the written
authorization from the Director, Facilities Management Department, or his designee, shall be at his own
risk, cost and expense. The ENGINEER hereby agrees that without such prior written authorization, he
will make no claim for compensation for such work or materials furnished.
J. Failure to perform any part of the additional services identified within this section shall constitute a
violation of this contract. In the event of such failure, the COUNTY reserves the right to contract with
others to have these services completed and the full amount for such a contract as well as such reasonable
costs incurred by the COUNTY to obtain that contract shall be borne by the ENGINEER. This cost shall
be deducted from fees due the ENGINEER.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 17I079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 27

EXHIBIT B — HOURLY RATES
Facilities Management Department
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
3 YEAR TERM
ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT
SERIAL # 171079-ROQ
CONTRACT NO. 171079-ROQ
COMPANY NAME: Van Boerum & Frank Associates, Inc.
(To Follow)
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 28

FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
EXHIBIT B- FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, AND FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING SERVICES
COMPANY NAME: Van Boerum & Frank Associates, Inc.
(The following is the format for the fees schedule. Please add/delete applicable job classifications as
may be applicable to on-call/as required project work assignments).
STAFF CLASSIFICATION DIRECT LABOR BILLING
HOURLY RATE HOURLY RATE
Principal 54.76 178.30
Senior Project Manager N/A N/A
Project Manager 38.09 124.03
Project Engineer 31.93 103.94
Engineer 27.88 90.77
Engineering Designer 25.41 82.73
Specifications Writer 54.76 178.30
AutoCAD Operator 19.73 64.24
Cost Estimator 54.76 178.30
Administrative/Clerical Support Included Included
Drafter 19.73 64.24
Multiplier: 196 % Overhead
10 % Profit

EXHIBIT C - MARICOPA COUNTY SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
PROGRAM PARTICIPATION REPORTING FORM
This form is to be submitted with each pay application or invoice. Any pay application or invoice without this form attached is subject
to rejection as not being a completed pay application or invoice pursuant to the terms of the contract.
Name of Prime Consultant/Contractor Contract No.
Contact Person Project No.
Street Address Amount of this Pay Application/Invoice
City, State ZIP
Complete below with information on the SBE firms utilized as subconsultants/subcontractors for this pay application/invoice. If work
was self-performed and your firm, as the prime, is an SBE firm pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1001, et seq., then you may list your firm as the
SBE firm.
SBE Firm Name SBE Firm Address Type or Work Performed $ Pd to SBE this App/Inv
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
El A mark in this box certifies that no SBE firms were utilized as the prime, subconsultant or subcontractor with respect to
this pay application/invoice.
Date:
Phone No.:
Printed Name
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 29

VAN BOERUM
8( FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC,
CONSUL ERS
ATTACHMENT 2- LEGAL WORKER CERTIFICATION
May 3rd, 2017
(Date)
Maricopa County
Office of Procurement Services
320 W. Lincoln St. (2nd Floor)
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
As required by Arizona Revised Statutes §41-4401, Maricopa County (the "County") is prohibited, after September
30, 2008 from awarding a contract to any contractor who fails, or whose subcontractors fail, to comply with Arizona
Revised Statutes § 23-214-A. The undersigned entity warrants that it complies fully with all federal immigration
laws and regulations that relate to its employees, that it shall verify, through the employment verification pilot
program as jointly administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security
Administration or any of its successor programs, the employment eligibility of each employee hired after December
31, 2007, and that it shall require its subcontractors and sub-subcontractors to provide the same warranties to the
below entity.
The undersigned acknowledges that a breach of this warranty by the below entity or by any subcontractor or sub-
subcontractor under any Contract resulting from this solicitation shall be deemed a material breach of the Contract,
and is grounds for penalties, including termination Of the Contract, by the County. The County retains the right to
inspect the records of the below entity, subcontractor and sub-subcontractor employee who performs work under the
Contract, and to conduct random verification of the employment records of the below entity and any subcontractor
and sub-subcontractor who works on the Contract, to ensure that the below entity and each subcontractor and sub-
subcontractor is complying with the warranties set forth above.
Van Boerum & Frank Associates, Inc. 1602 S Priest Drive, Suite 103
(Firm) (Address Line 1)
Byron Torgersen, P.E. Tempe, Arizona 85281
(Print Name) (Address Line 2)
480-889-5075
(Phone)
480-889-5076
(Fax)
btorgersen@vbfa.com 87-0292348
(Email Address) (Federal Taxpayer ID Number)

EXHIBIT E
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.1 Scope. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided elsewhere in the Contract, the alternative
dispute resolution ("ADR") process provided herein shall be the exclusive means for resolution of
claims or disputes arising under or related to the Contract, the interpretation thereof or the performance
or breach by any party thereto, including but not limited to original claims or disputes asserted as cross
claims, counterclaims, third party claims or claims for indemnity or subrogation, in any threatened or
ongoing litigation or arbitration with third parties, if such disputes involve parties to contracts
containing this ADR provision. No changes can be made to this process without the mutual assent of
the County and the claimant. The parties have structured this procedure with the goal of providing for
the prompt, efficient and final resolution of all disputes falling within the purview of this ADR
process.
1.2 Meeting of Principals. When a claim is made or a dispute (hereafter "dispute") as described in
Paragraph 1.1 arises, senior representatives of the County and the claimant will meet personally within
ten (10) business days to discuss the dispute and attempt to resolve it. If, after good faith efforts,
resolution is not achieved, the dispute will proceed to mediation.
1.3 Qualifications of Mediator and Arbitrators. Any person selected as mediator or arbitrator, either as
single arbitrator as a member or Chair of the arbitration panel, shall be a member of the State Bar of
Arizona and have experience in construction law.
1.4 Mediation. If the parties have been unable to resolve the dispute after a meeting of principals, the
parties may enter into mediation. The parties shall jointly select a mediator. The parties may mutually
agree to waive mediation and proceed directly to arbitration. If the mediation process is requested by
either party, the mediation period shall be informal and shall not exceed sixty (60) calendar days from
the selection of the mediator. During the mediation process either party may terminate mediation on
written notice to the other party and the mediator.
1.5 Binding Arbitration Procedure. The following binding arbitration procedure shall serve as the
exclusive method to resolve a dispute if mediation is unsuccessful, if mediation has been waived by
the parties, or if a party requests arbitration during the mediation process. Except as provided in
Section 1.7.5 and 1.7.9, the decision of the arbitrator or arbitrator panel is final and binding on the
parties and not subject to further judicial review.
1.5.1 A party requesting binding arbitration shall notify the other party of their demand for
arbitration in writing within seven (7) calendar days of (1) the failure of mediation; (2) waiver
of mediation; or (3) of the party's demand to terminate mediation.
1.5.2 If the Engineer requests arbitration it shall post a cash bond with the arbitrator in an amount
agreed upon by the parties or, in the event of no agreement, the arbitrator shall establish the
amount of the cash bond to defray the cost of the arbitration and the proceeds from the bond
shall be allocated in accordance with paragraph 1.7.7. The bond must be in the full amount
agreed upon or as established by the Arbitrator to pay the potential cost of the full arbitration
proceeding. The bond must be posted with and received by the arbitrator within five (5)
calendar days after the demand for arbitration.
1.5.3 Disputes involving less than $200,000 shall be heard by one single arbitrator chosen by
agreement of the parties. If the parties cannot agree on the single arbitrator, then the parties
shall each submit two names to a Judge designated by Maricopa County who shall select the
single arbitrator.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 31

1.5.4 For disputes in excess of $200,000, the arbitration panel shall consist of three arbitrators: the
County's appointed arbitrator, the Engineer appointed arbitrator and a third arbitrator who
shall be selected by the parties' arbitrators and serve as the Chair of the arbitration panel.
1.5.5 The arbitration is to be convened and administered under the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act
("RUAA") (A.R.S. § 12-3001 et seq.) and the American Arbitration Association Construction
Rules shall serve as a guideline for proceedings, thus as a supplement to the RUAA.
1.6 Expedited Hearing. Any party can request the single arbitrator or the Chair of the arbitration panel to
set an expedited hearing. If the single arbitrator or the Chair of the arbitration panel determines that the
circumstances justify it, the single arbitrator or the Chair of the arbitration panel will arrange for
scheduling of the arbitration at the earliest possible date. In any event, the hearing of any dispute not
expedited will commence as soon as practical but in no event later than thirty (30) calendar days after
notification of request for arbitration having been received. This deadline can be extended only with
the consent of all the parties to the dispute, or by decision of the single arbitrator or the Chair of the
arbitration panel upon a showing of good cause.
1.7 Procedure. The single arbitrator or the arbitration panel will conduct the hearing in such a manner that
will resolve disputes in a prompt, cost efficient manner giving regard to the rights of all parties. Each
party shall supply to the single arbitrator or arbitration panel a written pre-hearing statement which
shall contain a brief statement of the nature of the claim or defense, a list of witnesses and exhibits, a
brief description of the subject matter of the testimony of each witness who will be called to testify,
and an estimate as to the length of time that will be required for the arbitration hearing. The single
arbitrator or the Chair of the arbitration panel shall determine the nature and scope of discovery, if any,
and the manner of presentation of relevant evidence consistent with deadlines provided herein, and the
parties' objective that disputes be resolved in a prompt and efficient manner No discovery may be
had of any materials or information for which a privilege is recognized by Arizona law. The single
arbitrator or the Chair upon proper application shall issue such orders as may be necessary and
permissible under law to protect confidential, proprietary or sensitive materials or information from
public disclosure or other misuse. Any party may make application to the Maricopa County Superior
Court to have a protective order entered as may be appropriate to confirm or enforce such orders of the
Chair.
1.7.1 Hearing Days. In order to effectuate parties' goals, the hearing once commenced, will proceed
from working day to working day until concluded, absent a showing of good cause.
1.7.2 Award. The single arbitrator shall within ten (10) calendar days of the conclusion of a hearing
issue an award. The arbitration panel shall, within ten (10) calendar days from the conclusion
of any hearing, by majority vote, issue its award. The award shall include an allocation of fees
and costs pursuant to 1.7.7 herein. The award is to be in accordance with the Contract and the
law of the State of Arizona.
1.7.3 Scope of Award. Regardless of the provisions of the RUAA, the arbitration panel shall be
without authority to award punitive damages, and any such punitive damage award shall be
void. If an award is made against any party in excess of one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000), exclusive of interest, arbitration fees, costs and attorneys' fees, it shall be
supported by written findings of fact, conclusions of law and a statement as to how damages
were calculated.
1.7.4 Jurisdiction. The arbitration panel shall not be bound for jurisdictional purposes by the
amount asserted in any party's claim, but shall conduct a preliminary hearing into the question
of jurisdiction over the claim as regards its amount upon application of any party at the earliest
convenient time, but not later than the commencement of the arbitration hearing. If the dispute
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROO
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 32

is determined to involve less than $200,000, the arbitration shall continue before the Neutral
Arbitrator as a single arbitrator, with the party appointed arbitrators being excused.
1.7.5 Entry of Judgment. As provided in the RUAA, any party can make application to the
Maricopa County Superior Court for confirmation of an award, and for entry of judgment on
it.
1.7.6 Severance and Joinder. To reduce the possibility of inconsistent adjudications, the Mediator
or the single arbitrator or arbitration panel, may: (i) at the request of any party, join and/or
sever parties, and/or claims arising under other contracts containing this ADR provision, and
(ii) the Mediator, on his own authority, or the single arbitrator or arbitration panel may, on its
own authority, join or sever parties and/or claims subject to this ADR process as deemed
necessary for a just resolution of the dispute, consistent with the parties' goal of the prompt
and efficient resolution of disputes, provided; however, that the A/E, OWNER and Project
Professionals shall not be joined as a party to any claim made by a Engineer. Nothing herein
shall create the right by any party to assert claims against another party not arising under or
related to the Contract or not recognized under the substantive law as applicable to the dispute.
Neither the Mediator nor the single arbitrator or arbitration panel is authorized to join to the
proceeding parties not in privity with the County. The Engineer cannot be joined to any
pending arbitration proceeding, without Engineer express written consent and unless Engineer
is given the opportunity to participate in the selection of the single arbitrator or non-County
appointed arbitrator.
1.7.7 Fees and Costs. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs in connection with any informal
hearing before the mediation. All fees and costs associated with any arbitration before the
single panel or arbitration panel, including without limitation the arbitrator fees, and the
prevailing party's reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees and costs, will be paid by the
non-prevailing party, except as provided for herein. In the event that Engineer is the non-
prevailing party, all fees and costs as noted above shall first be paid out of the bond posted
with the arbitrator. In no event shall the Engineer obligation to pay fees and costs be limited
to the amount of the bond posted herein. In no event shall any arbitrator's hourly fees be
awarded in an amount in excess of $250 per hour and (i) costs shall not include any travel
expenses in excess of mileage at the rate paid by Maricopa County, not to exceed a one way
trip of 150 miles, and (ii) all travel expenses, including meals, shall be reimbursed pursuant to
the travel policy of Maricopa County in effect at the time of the hearing. The determination of
prevailing and non-prevailing parties, and the appropriate allocation of fees and costs, will be
included in the award by the single arbitrator or arbitration panel.
1.7.8 Confidentiality. Any proceeding initiated under this ADR provision shall be deemed
confidential to the maximum extent allowed by Arizona law and, except for disclosures to a
party's attorneys or accountants, no party shall make any disclosure related to the disputed
matter or to the outcome of any proceeding except to the extent required by law, or to seek
interim equitable relief, or to enforce an agreement reached by the parties or an award made
hereunder. This provision does not affect the County's right to inform the County Supervisors
of the dispute.
1.7.9 Equitable Litigation. Notwithstanding any other provision of ADR to the contrary, any party
can petition the Maricopa County Superior Court for interim equitable relief as may become
necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent immediate and irreparable harm to a party or
to the Project pending resolution of a dispute pursuant to ADR provided herein. No court may
order any permanent injunctive relief except as may be necessary to enforce an order entered
by the arbitration panel. The fees and costs incurred in connection with any such equitable
proceeding shall be determined and assessed in ADR.
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. I71079-ROQ
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 33

1.7.10 Change Order. Any award in favor of the Engineer against the County or in favor of the
County against the Engineer shall be reduced to a Change Order and executed by the parties in
accordance with the award and the provisions of the Contract or a settlement agreement as
appropriate.
1.7.11 Merger and Bar. Any claim asserted pursuant to this ADR process shall be deemed to include
all claims, demands, and requests for compensation for costs and losses or other relief,
including the extension of the Contract performance period which reasonably should or could
have been brought against any party that was or could have been brought into this ADR
process, with respect to the subject claim. The arbitration panel shall apply legal principles
commonly known as merger and bar to deny any claim or claims against any party regarding
which claim or claims recovery has been sought or should have been sought in a previously
adjudicated claim for an alleged cost, loss, breach, error, or omission.
1.8 Inclusion in Other Contracts. The Engineer shall cooperate with the County in efforts to include this
ADR provision in all other Project contracts.
END OF EXHIBIT
TERM ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT SERIAL NO. 171079-ROO
Term Electrical Engineering Services Page 34

VAN BOERUIVI
FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maricopa County
Statement of Qualifications for
Term Electrical Engineering Services
Serial #171079-ROQ
Contract #171079-ROQ
Due Date: Thursday, May 4, 2017
Due Time: 2:00 PM (Arizona Time)

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC,
CONSULTING N
May 4, 2017
Mr. Paul Shamrock, CPPB
Maricopa County Article V Procurement Officer
320 W. Lincoln Street, 2nd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Dear am roc emb he Selection Committe
e included on 'LI-1E -
a He" - alified
erti
...ED/Sustainable L-
Enerd icopa County:
We have t‘re a 20 teen involved with
number of pro:: a term cow 1g the STAR Ca
the Durango Jail C d the Durango (. ET Zone 2 AE •
ts, Our lards, requir
he ground We look foi• -„,;a, .
and working tor- Ii _ntract.
has
a id clients
ersity. studies were car.
existin repair SC
ly nd effecti\ priorities
hs. Projects h- :ay of eletrica
Pcwer Sy Lighti Contr(„) ,
f Re. le Energy
a Count
re knovi.,. have
-e the most enerc . system li-
rn:Cal approach - now or futuit rtise wi I L.
o each and eve Vlaricopa County project. no n size pa.
PHOENIX SALT LAKE CITY LOGAN ST. GEORGE
1602 South Priest Drive, Suite 103 330 S.300 E. 40155 Cache Valley Blvd., Bldg. 1, Ste. 12 230 North 1680 East, Building V
Tempe, AZ 85281 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Logan, UT 84341 St. George, UT 84770
p 480.889.50751 f 480.809.5076 p 801.530,31481f 801.5.30.3150 p 425.752.5081 11435.757.0335 p 435.674.27081f 425.674.4800

VAN BOERUM
&FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
We are EmAed n y. Our enginrs have enjrivg
working on C e we d a rapport enc.! : nship
with your get thin_ working to7,- or the good o
the "entire t vii , an n end °duct every , t'e proud to have ber nvolved,
We a, ity to present our co ons for consideration. If you have any
quest] ts, or would I : ditici on, please do not hesitate to contact us at
OERLIM & FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC,
Voast, RE Associate Principal
in-Charge
Y E.
Pr
PHOENIX SALT LAKE MY LOGAN ST. GEORGE
1602 South Priest Drive, Suite 103 330 5.300 E. 40 W. Ca she Valley Blvd., Bldg. 1, Ste. B 230 North 1680 East, Building V
Tempe, AZ 85281 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Logan, UT 84341 St. George, UT 84770
p 480.889.5075 480.889.5076 p 801.530.3148 11501.530.3150 P 435.752.508111435.752.0335 p 435.674.270515435,674.4800

IAN BOEFUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTNG ENGINEERS
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
DURANGO CAMPUS OET ZONE 2 ASSESSMENT PROJECT (JAIL / OFFICE)
Maricopa County - Phoenix, Arizona
a) SCOPE:
Size:
17 buildings, approximately 60 rooms.
Schedule:
01/09/2012 - 02/06/2012.
Budget:
Hourly not to exceed $100,000
Complexity:
The study needed to be completed within approximately 19 days or funding would not '-
available until 2014, The study was to survey the spaces, write a report of existing con': ,
and minimum requirements needed to accommodate new server equipment. Many of ti
areas surveyed were secured and required a county escort. A sheriff's escort was needed
when accessing inmate areas, which required advanced planning and staying on schedule
to allow for access to the facilities, Flexibility was also important to accommodate county
personnel if they could not meet at the scheduled time due to schedule conflicts.
b) SERVICES PROVIDED:
Electrical I Mechanical Design
c) OWNER'S STARTING BUDGET ESTIMATE:
Hourly not to exceed $100,000
Final Contract Amount:
$18,481 (Study Only)
Change Orders and Savings Achievements:
Not / bie
d) PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Desired project schedule was achieved.
e) DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS:
Not Applicable
COLLABORATIVE INTERACTIONS/INITIATIVES:
Due to a tight schedule and the amount of people required to do the survey, it was critical
to meet the schedule since the County would not be able to get funding again until the
next fiscal year. To be proactive the report was updated after each survey day and the team
worked nights and weekends until the report was completed. This approach !lowed the study
to include a lot of information in a short period of time and meet the tight de ne.
g) CLIENT REFERENCES:
See Attachment 1

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
DURANGO JAIL CHILLED WATER UPGRADES (JAIL / DETENTION)
Maricopa County - Phoenix, Arizona
a) SCOPE:
Size:
Not Applicable
Schedule:
08/2014 - 09/2016
Budget:
$1,100,000 approximately
Complexity:
Van Boerum & Frank A ociates provided the electrical and mechanical engineering
services associate(Il e chilled water upgrades located at the facility's central plant.
The upgrades include new tertiary pumps, control upgrades and plant/system piping
modifications,
b) SERVICES PROVIDED:
Electrical / Mechanical Design
c) OWNER'S STARTING BUDGET ESTIMATE:
Approximately $100,000
Final Contract Amount:
Approximately $100,000
Change Orders and Savings Achievements:
Accelerated Construction Schedule was utilized to minimize the central plant downtime.
d) PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Desired project schedule was achleved.
e) DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS:
No disputes were encountered.
COLLABORATIVE INTERACTIONS/INITIATIVES:
Monthly meetings with the County Project Manager were conducted to address client
needs throughout the project.
9 ) CLIENT REFERENCES:
See Attachment 1

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
SOUTHEAST JUVENILE FACILITY HEATING (JAIL / DETENTION)
Maricopa County, Arizona
a) SCOPE:
Size:
141,000 SF
Schedule:
08/2013 - 04/2014
Budget:
Approximately $100,000
Complexity:
Upgraded two (2) hot water boilers. Controls were tied into the existing building management
system. Power design was fairly simple because existing panels had capacity for the new
load,
b) SERVICES PROVIDED:
Electrical / Mechanical Design
c) OWNER'S STARTING BUDGET ESTIMATE:
Approximatty $180,000
Final Contract Amount:
Approximat(.._ "" 30,000
Change Orders and Savings Achievements:
Not Applicable
d) PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Desired project schedule was achieved.
e) DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS:
No disputes were encountered.
COLLABORATIVE INTERACTIONS/INITIATIVES:
Not Applicable
g) CLIENT REFERENCES:
See Attachment 1

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY E125 LABORATORY (HEALTH / LABORATORY)
Tempe, Arizona
a) SCOPE:
Size:
1,200 SF
Schedule:
04/2016 - 11/2016
Budget:
$1,200,000
Complexity:
The ASU E125 Lab is designed to support the operation of three (3) Metal Organic Chemical
Vapor Decomposition Units (MOCVD). The lab has been provided with a dedicated air
handler, process fluid cooler, chemical fume hoods, gas safety cabinets, hydrogen gas
manifold and bottle storage area, and two (2) Controlled Decomposition Oxidation Units to
scrub the exhaust air from the MOO VD's state-of-the-art automatic temperature controls
have been provided to maintain the lab space temperature and space pressurization. A high
performance fume hood exhaust control system was provided with the lab to maximize the
energy efficiencies associated with the lab. Electrical systems were challenging in the 50 year
old building. New electrical panels were adapted to handle the new load.
b) SERVICES PROVIDED:
Electrical I Mechanical Design
c) OWNER'S STARTING BUDGET ESTIMATE:
$1,000,000 (Original)
Final Contract Amount:
After bidding / scope changes - Approximately $1,200,000
Change Orders and Savings Achievements:
Added scope $5,000
d) PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Desired project schedule was achieved.
e) DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS:
No disputes were encountered.
f") COLLABORATIVE INTERACTIONS/INITIATIVES:
Collabratech Sc was very helpful to the client and engineer in making
recornmendatic. gas piping,
g ) CLIENT REFERENCES:
See Attachment 1

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS SITE LIGHTING STUDY (PARKING / SITE)
Tempe, Arizona
a) SCOPE:
Size:
642 acres (Tempe Campus)
Schedule:
08/2016 - 05/2017 estimated completion
Budget:
$165,110
Complexity:
Inventory and map existing exterior light fixtures in GIS format and locate lighting control
locations and power sources. Survey condition of existing lighting equipment and measure
and map existing lighting levels across campus and in seven (7) parking structures. Develop
recommendations for reducing energy cone,. '::htiirn and develop campus lighting guidelines.
Identify architectural lighting opportunities for iHstoric buildings and provide cost estimates.
b) SERVICES PROVIDED:
Electrical Study
c) OWNER'S STARTING BUDGET ESTIMATE:
$165,110
Final Contract Amount:
$165,110
Change Orders and Savings Achievements:
Not Applicable
d) PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Schedule has lengthened due to the need for more information.
e) DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS:
No disputes were encountered.
COLLABORATIVE INTERACTIONS/INITIATIVES:
Client made excellent suggestions that VBFA utilized, which benefited the process and
outcome.
g) CLIENT REFERENCES:
See Attachment 1

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSUL NE
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
ARIZONA NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS DEHUMIDIFICATION (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
Chandler, Arizona
a) SCOPE:
Size:
3,000 SF
Schedule:
0212017 - 05/2017 estimated completion
Budget:
$1,000,000
Complexity:
This project consisted of upgrading the existing dehumidification systems serving multiple
spaces at the facility. The new systems provided the dehumidification process for the spaces
to have an operating conditioning of 70 'F and 25% Relative Humidity. The power system was
heavily loaded and sources had to be sought from multiple panels.
b) SERVICES PROVIDED:
Electrical / Mechanical Design
c) OWNER'S STARTING BUDGET ESTIMATE:
Approximately $750,000
Final Contract Amount:
Approximately $1,000,000
Change Orders and Savings Achievements:
Added scope from ANS raised the contract $250,000
d) PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Desired project schedule was achieved.
e) DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS:
A few clarifications were needed during construction. There were no disputes,
COLLABORATIVE INTERACTIONS/INITIATIVES:
Because the power system was so heavily loaded, it took a collaborative effort between the
client and the contractor to define sources of electrical power.
g) CLIENT REFERENCES:
See Attachment 1

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
HISTORIC MESA LDS TEMPLE HVAC UPGRADES (HISTORIC)
Mesa, Arizona
a) Size:
$113,916 SF
Schedule:
10/2013 - 04/2017
Budget:
$2,500,000
Complexity:
Van Boerum & Frank Associates provided the electrical and mechanical engineering services
associated with the upgrade and replacement of this 1921 circa facility's (5) existing air
handlers. The project also included the replacement of the existing central plant motor control
center cooling tower and the addition of a plate and frame heat exchanger. This has been
done in four (4) phases in order to keep each air handler replacement to a four (4) week
shutdown, or less, each six months.
b) SERVICES PROVIDED:
Electrical / Mechanical Design
c) OWNER'S STARTING BUDGET ESTIMATE:
$2,500,000
Final Contract Amount:
$2,500,000
Change Orders and Savings Achievements:
Not Applicable
d) PROJECT SCHEDULE:
fl d project schedule was achieved.
e) DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS:
Difficulty with air handler controls which were supplied by another firm. We worked with the
client and the controls firm to get the controls working correctly and to the client's satisfaction.
COLLABORATIVE INTERACTIONS/INITIATIVES:
Helped troubleshoot controls issues.
g) CLIENT REFERENCES:
See Attachment 1

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
THE HUB - CLARIUS PARTNERS (INDUSTRIAL)
Tempe, Arizona
a) SCOPE:
Size:
285,096 SF
Schedule:
06/2016 - 02/2017 Design; 11/2016- 11/2017
Budget:
$35,000,000
Complexity:
VBFA provided the electrical and mechanical engineering services associated \Anti -
re-purposing an animal science testing laboratory to a shell office building. The electrical
service was rated for 16000A 480V.
b) SERVICES PROVIDED:
Electrical / Mechanical
c) OWNER'S STARTING BUDGET ESTIMATE:
$35,000,000
Final Contract Amount:
$35,000,000
Change Orders and Savings Achievements:
Sa ad existing panels and transformers from demo and reinstalled them for use in the shell
g.
d) PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Desired project schedule was achieved for design. Construction is ongoing.
e) DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS:
No disputes, but due to the size he project, the team worked closely with the contractors to
resolve field questions;
COLLABORATIVE INTERACTIONS/INITIATIVES:
The contractor has made some cost/time saving suggestions which were evaluated and
included where possible, such as revised lighting fixtures.
g) CLIENT REFERENCES:
See Attachment 1

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ARIZONA LICENSE AND OFFICE CAPABILITIES
VBFA HOLDS THE APPROPRIATE LICENSE TO CONDUCT BUSINESS IN ARIZONA.
Arizona License Number (Board of Technical Registration): #13059 -1, Expires September 7, 2017
ARIZONA OFFICE STAFF AND CORPORATE SUPPORT STAFF
Tempe Office Location: Corporate Office Location:
1602 S Priest Drive, Suite 103 330 S 300 E
Tempe, AZ 85281 Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Electrical Staff 3 Electrical Staff 7
Mechanical Staff 6 Mechanical Staff 97
AVERAGE PROJECTS PER YEAR
VBFA Tempe average projects per year 137
VBFA Corporate average projects per year 505
EXPERIENCED AS A PRIME CONSULTANT AND ON TERM CONTRACTS
VBFA's engineers are experienced at providing services as the Prime Consultant for many projects that
have fees ranging from under $10,000 up to and over $1,000,000 -- being responsible for all design and
construction administration services. The following is a list of term / on-call contracts currently held with
other agencies:
• Maricopa County MPE 5 Year "direct select" ($100,000 remaining for 2017)
• Maricopa Community College MPE 5 Year with Renewal - Expires
• Arizona Department of Administration MPE Annual Contract - Expires 1/31/2018
• Arizona State University (Laboratories) MPE Annual Renewal - Expires 1/31/2018
• University of Arizona MPE Annual Contract with Renewal - Expires 3/31/2018
• Target Financial Services MPE Engineer of Record
• Salt Lake City Department of Airports Electrial / Mechanical 3 Year Contract - Expires 1/1/2020
EXPERIENCED WORKING FOR MARICOPA COUNTY
Our assigned engineers knowledge and experience working for the County as part of a Term Contract
provides insight that will help our team meet your requirements for cost and time schedules. We are
knowledgeable of the County's standards and procedures and have developed relationships with your
personnel since 2011. We will work closely with your staff to provide system designs that fit your needs,
provide ease I minimal maintenance requirements, with energ: cpriservation and budget as a priority in
our designs. The following is a list of successful projects c( lad for Maricopa County:
• Maricopa Community College District —2016 5 Year On Ca:: Engineering Services Contract (not to
exceed $350,000 per year), AZ
• Maricopa County BOS Auditorium Audio Visual Upgrade, AZ
• Maricopa County Clerk Server Room Upgrade, AZ
• Maricopa County Durango Jail Cooling Water Controls, AZ
• Maricopa County Durango Kitchen Remodel, AZ
• Maricopa County Sheriff's IT Room Upgrade, AZ
• Maricopa County Tower Jail Air Analysis, AZ
• Maricopa County West Court Building Upgrade, AZ
• Maricopa County East Courts (Various Projects), AZ
• Maricopa County Central Courts (Various Projects), AZ
• Maricopa County STAR Call Center, Phoenix, AZ
• Maricopa County Jail Hot Water System Upgrade, AZ
• Maricopa County Durango Kitchen, Phoenix, AZ

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTNJG ENGINEERS
PROJECT COST AND TIME SAVINGS
Throughout our 45 year history, our engineers have gained tremendous insight as to what is required to
accommodate the needs and requirements of our clients on their specific project. We take pride in hiring
an educated staff, promotes continuing education, and implements programs that encourage "outside
the box" thinking, which has resulted in a number of unique design solutions and in-house design tools
HVAC Solution® and designing the first LEED Platinum/NPit Zero Energy K-12 school in Utah. This
continuous focus en excellence contributes to the effeci rss, efficiency and success of our engineers
which in turn :sore:hetes to the success of our clients. T following items provide an overview of our
resources, procedures and practices to save time and minimize costs for County projects:
FIRM CAPACITY PROVIDES ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO BENEFIT COUNTY PROJECTS
VBFA has120+ employees spread between four (4) office locations — three located in Utah (Salt Lake
City, Logan, St, George), and one office located in Tempe, Arizona, Our Tempe, Arizona office will lead
and be involved with all County projects, However, we will utilize additional team members from our Utah
Cfices for projects where their specific expeitse sill be of value or to maintain project schedules.
Arizona ersity To US BrBer leers stud exterior
lighting pe carnet ,. was an e underta
and re -:lu tforts a re Arizona and . C 1 Ryan Van Carry Hue
sine Faws Vale Kevin Connor, Lewis , Sarah
ULU:ZANG 'THE MOST ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES INCREASES FIRM EFFICIENCY
Adva - technology and a commitment to teamwork allows our engineers, in all locations, to collab-
orase, nEfer data and work togesier as if in o a location, This four (4) office collaborative approach
saves -e End money for our cl" 's. Examp' of our technologies include:
'sk A360 for RevieFe_ Cloud Ce ) ation.
The: epol allows our engineers to utilize vii'are project files in one central workspace. It keeps
our proje.cts, files and teams up-to-date, sther they u a in the same office, or not, or in the field,
am include s - who sire on the Dignity Health Chandler
r C Addition Arizona Siena mpus Exterior Ligreing Study.
..vit h A.C.; olutio€1® Scft ,A. 3engineers)
We have the experese to model electric: ns, cjctwcrk, piping, and plumbing
Revit 2017 and AutoCAD MEP 2017. MocCHg services can be extended fully or partially to fit the
particular project and budget requirements. This will save the County time and money by solving
p 3blerns ear 'y in the design phase, resulting in a substantiel decrea a in RFIs and Change Orders.
l-letet h Chandler F000nei Medical Center Fatient Teni ,Jer ReVit helped the team with
S etion ro we could! eg chat rses on pap expense of field we -
-crlogy
Our engineers have developed expertise and invested in LIDAR technology, This technology
utilizes 3D laser scanners for Electrical, Mechanical/Plumbing and Structural Systems to detect any
interference from existing systems so drawings can be corrected prior to construction. This saves
time and money for designers, contractors and owners.
FULL 1N-HOUSE ENGINEERING CAPABILITIES -
Mechanilcal / Fire Protection Expertise / Coe. nin 7 e
Our mechanical engineering expertise includes o rt-t: consc !studies, audits and retrofitting
projects and the design and supervision of the ins. . ion of c I and industrial mechanical
systems, including boiler plants, building heating, ye • lating„ air nditioning plumbing and fire protection
systems, and utility distribution systems.

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC._
CONSULT
PROJECT COST AND TIME SAVINGS
VBFC consists of professional engineers v a sound understanding of engineering principles and 40+
years of building design experience. We heErve the commissioning process should start with the project
design to benefit the outcome of a project.
STATE, FEDERAL AND UTILITY REBATES / INCENTIVES & COORDINATION
Our engineers are experienced in working with the owner to review the cost benefits of various systems
solutions along with any federal,state and utility incentives and coordination. This way, an educated
decision can be made as to what design choice(s) will be the most cost effective prior to design.
COMMUNICATION IS CRITICAL TO THE SUCCESS OF ANY PROJECT
Client satisfaction is our highest priority. Our assigned engineers F: experienced at interfacing with the
Owner, User, Project Managers and other stakeholders. We promeie communication by encouraging
kick-off meetings, weekly team interactive meetings, preliminary bet in ritorming sessions, feasibility
study meetings, monthly client meetings, on-site strategy sessions, value engineering sessions, and
cost control sessions. All of these arrangements have shown us the value of continuous and open
communicatien toward the ultimate goal - a successful project,
DLn env C -2-us GET Zone 2 Assessment: This study needed to be completed wittUn days in order:
to.maintain . Meslinqu nnd commuricntkin nnas continuous in order to Meet th nnds of the
County and d te the 1.). ujeci within the udh schedule.
EXPERIENCE PROVIDES INSIGHT AS TO WHAT SYSTEMS WILL MEET PROJECT GOALS
One of our strongest assets is our experience working with owners and other design team members in
the design of facilities e unique requirements. Over the past 45 years, our engineers have developed
the insight as to whieti ectricalimechanical systems have the best performance, are the most energy
efficient, and what initial investment will provide the most economical approach - now and for the future.
ENERGY MODELING / STUDIES PROVIDE INSIGHT TO ACHIEVE THE BUDGET & GOALS
Our team's energy modeling expertise includes Energy Code Compliance, LEED Certification, Utility
Incentives and Building Energy Audits to determine the best approach for upgrades to existing buildings.
A preliminary model is prepared during the conceptual phase. Other available expertise includes Arc
Flash studies, and calculations for voltage drop and short circuits.
EXPERIENCED USING A VARIETY OF INNOVATIVE DELIVERY METHODS
We understand each project is unique and may n -;iiire a specific delivery method to achieve project
goals. VVhether the goal is to achieve a strict bi horten the constructif period, ensure continuous
operational during construction we have experi- ce , ' it all. Experience des Design / Build, Design
Assist, Multiple P.ased Construction.
I y o as6i;-zi: the eo i
process.
CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
Our team is experienced and prepared to provide any/or all construction administration services as
requested by the County. Our typical services range from bid walks with prospective contractors, review
of bids to assure conformance with bid documents, review of submittals, answering PHs, preparation of
sketches to meet specifications, attendance at construction meetings, job observations to ensure that all
bid document requirements are met and a final punch list to highlight areas of non-conformance,

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULT ENGINEE RS
KEY TEAM MEMBERS
4 VAN VOAST, RE. AS, i TL
Principal In Charge
Ryan Van \toast is an Associate Principal with 11 years of engineering
experience. He has provided engineering services for airports, office
buildings, higher education / K-12, healthcare, manufacturing, data
centers, and sports / recreation facilities. Ryan is skilled in designing an
array of electrical systems including electrical power systems, emergency
power, interior and exterior lighting, structured cabling, audio/video,
security, CCTV, fire alarms, lighting control equipment, occupancy lighting
control and equipment, voice data (LAN) distribution systems, and
alternative energy — Photovoltaic,
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Project: Arizona State University Exterior Lighting Study, EDUCATION
Tempe, AZ B.S., Electrical Engineering,
Role: Project Engineer Montana State University
Size: ASU Campus PROFESSIONAL
Schedule: 2016 - Current REGISTRATIONS
Complexity: Inventory and map existing exterior light fixtures in GIS Licensed Professional
format. Locate lighting control locations and power Engineer Utah License
sources. Survey condition of existing lighting equipment. #23191
Measure and map existing lighting levels. Develop Arizona License In Progress
recommendations for reducing energy consumption.
Develop campus lighting guidelines. Identify PROFESSIONAL
architectural lighting opportunities for historic buildings. AFFILIATIONS
Provide cost estimates.
Member, Institute of Electrical
and Electronic Engineers
Project: City & County Building Fire Alarm Upgrade (IEEE)
Salt Lake City, UT Firm Member, U.S. Green
Role: Project Engineer Building Council (USGBC)
Size: Unknown
Schedule: 6/2010 - 1/2011 PROFESSIONAL
Complexity: Replaced the existing fire alarm system with a new state EXPERIENCE
of the art addressable system. Van Boerum & Frank
Associates, Inc., Electrical
Project: Utah Department of Corrections Draper Prison Block A Engineer, August
and Control room AC. 2009-present
Role: Electrical Engineer of Record Envision Engineering, June
Size: 170,000 Square Feet 2005-August 2009
Schedule: 12/2016 - 04/2017 United States Navy, 1996-
Complexity: Analyzed existing aging electrical distribution for 2000
necessary HVAC upgrade. We carefully designed
the electrical system for the project with careful
consideration for the inmate and guard safety and
security.

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULT N I ERIS
:(EY TEAM MEMBERS
AST, RE
RELEV 9CT EXPERIENCE - continued
CotJ 1 netention re/Laborato ry
GSA eti nal Center — New, UT American Fork Hospital —Misc. Areas, UT
GSA WF Bennett CF Services, UT American Fork Emergency Department
GSA James V. Hansen Federal Building, UT Remodel, UT
GSA James V. Hansen Federal Building Banner Ironwood Tenant Improvements, San
Service Upgrade, UT Tan Valley, AZ
Millard County Records Building, UT Cedar City Family Clinic, UT
Sevier County Jail, UT Greenwood Clinic Remodel, UT
State of Utah 5th District Courts Smoke • Huntsman Cancer Hospital Phase IIB, UT
Evacuation Doors, UT Intermountain IMAT Facility, UT
State of Utah Capital Building Waste Piping, UT Intermountain McKay Dee Hospital Nuclear
State of Utah Department of Corrections - Med Expansion, UT
Draper Prison - Multiple Projects, UT Intermountain Utah Valley Regional Medical
- Lone Peak and Timpanogos Bleigs. Center, UT
Air Handler Replacement Intermountain Utah Valley Regional Medical
Prison Block A and Control Room AC Center Fluoroscopy Remodel, UT
Anderson Bldg. HVAC Upgrades Intermountain Medical Center Lab Exhaust
Warden Administration Building Boiler Modifications, UT
Replacement and Controls Intermountain McKay Dee Hospital Chiller
- Olympus Bldg. H\/AC Upgrades Replacement, UT
State of Utah Governor's Mansion HVAC Mountain Medical (multiple projects), UT
Improvements, UT University of Utah Healthcare Building 529 —
State of Utah Matheson Courts Water Heater 525 Back-up Air Cooling, UT
Replacement, UT University of Utah Healthcare Redwood Road
Wasatch Youth Detention Intercom and CCTV Health Center, UT
Design, UT
West Jordan Fire and Police Station, UT
5/Administrz
Basic Research Office Re iodei, UT
Benec:,.<I Financial Group GTVV 4FL Data
Center Remodel, UT PROJECTS COMPLETE
BHI Building, Rock Springs, WY WITH KEYTEAM MEMBE
BLM Office Building, Pinedale, WY ASU - Site Lighting Study
IBM Fifth Floor Remodel, UT Wh -te Tank Cell Site
Merrill Lynch Data Center Eagle Gate Second Verizon Crown DAS Hotel
Floor, UT Little Cottonwood DAS Hate
Miller Morotsports Park Administration Building,
UT
Morgan Stanley Cottonwood Data Center, UT
Northrop Grumman Building Power Distribution,
UT
QED Office Building, Rock Springs, WY
Salt Lake Community College Student Union
Data Center HVAC Upgrade, UT

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSU G1NEERS
KEY TEAM MEMBERS
1:ULET, RE.
Project Manager
Barry Hulet has over 40 years of engineering and design experience,
including governmental, commercial and industrial projects. He has
designed the electrical systems for municipal facilities, office buildings,
server rooms, healthcare facilities, retail, schools distribution/warehouse
facilities and restaurants. Barry is skilled in designing: Electrical Power
Systems; Emergency Power; Interior and Exterior Lighting and Controls;
Structured Cabling (computer network and telephone); Security, Paging
and Fire Alarm Systems.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE (partial list)
Project: Arizona State University Exterior Lighting Study,
Tempe, Arizona EDUCATION
Role: Principal Engineer B.S. Electrical Engineering,
Size: ASU Campus (642 Acres) Brigham Young University,
Schedule: 2016 - Current 1974
Complexity: Inventory and map existing exterior light fixtures in Masters of Engineering,
GIS format. Locate lighting control locations and Electrical Engineering,
power sources. Measure and map existing lighting University of Idaho, 1979
levels. Develop recommendations for reducing energy
consumption. Develop campus lighting guidelines. PROFESSIONAL
Identify architectural lighting opportunities for historic REGISTRATIONS
buildings. Provide cost estimates. Licensed Professional
Engineer
Project: Downtown OET Assessment Project, Arizona License #38476
Maricopa County PROFESSIONAL
Role: Project Engineer ORGANIZATIONS
Size: Approximately 112 IT rooms were reviewed. MEMBER, United States
Schedule: December 2012- September 2013 Council for international
Complexity: Project was challenging because of the many buildings Engineering Practice
and occupants involved. This included some spaces (USCIEC)
that required security personnel guides because of the
sensitive nature of the rooms, Scheduling time to make MEMBER, National Council
the filed visits was complex and the county personnel of Examiners for Engineering
were very cooperative in helping us gain access to the and Surveying (NCEES)
spaces.
CORPORATE MEMBER,
US Green Building Council
Project: Durango Campus CET Zone 2 Assessment Awards (USGBC)
Role: Project Engineer
Size: Study of 17 buildings and 60 rooms.
Schedule: January 9, 2012 — February 6, 2012
Complexity: Coordination of all stakeholders and their schedules was
a significant effort. The schedule change from 8 to 4
weeks caused additional complexity to this project.

VAN BOERUM
8( FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULI1NG ENGINEE RS
KEY TEAM MEMBERS
ET, P
EVN . 'ROJECT PYPERIENCE - continued
C _LrtsiGc ,. _rnmen_ .tion Chandler Regional Medical Center (Various
- Coolidge Police Depa .ment (includes jail), Projects), Chandler AZ
Coolidge, AZ Chandler Regional Medical Center 1R-RF Labs,
Maricopa County BOS Auditorium Audio Visual AZ
Upgrade, Phoenix AZ Copper Queen Medical Center, Palominas, AZ
Maricopa County Central Courts (Various Crown Point Behavioral Health Center, Crown
Projects), AZ Point, NM
Maricopa County Durango Campus GET Zone Destiny Springs Behavioral Health, AZ
2 Assessment, Phoenix, AZ Great Basin Surgery Center Facility Upgrade,
Maricopa County Durango Kitchen Upgrade, AZ
AZ Havasu Regional Medical center (Various
Maricopa County Jail Hot Water System Projects), Lake Havasu City AZ
Upgrade, AZ La Paz Hospital, Parker, AZ
Maricopa County Recorders Storage Vault, Mercy Gilbert Medical Center (Various
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office IT Room Projects), Gilbert AZ
Upgrade, Phoenix, AZ St. Luke's Medical Center (Various Projects),
Maricopa County STAR Call Center, AZ Phoenix, AZ
• Maricopa County West Courts (Various Tri-City Colo-Rectal Addition, AZ
Project — , AZ Tucson Veterans Administration Inpatient
Mental Health Addition, AZ
Office L,.... Valley View Medical Center (Various Projects),
• Acader Mortgage, St, George, UT Ft. Mohave AZ
Arizona Nutritional Supplements Manufacturing
(Various Projects), AZ
Benetron, Berkley, CA
Brianhead Public Safety, UT
Contact Point, St. George, UT
Fisher Law Office, St. George, UT
Healthway Offices, Tempe, AZ
Lennar Office Complex, Tempe AZ
Little Fenway, St. George, UT
Painte Office Building, Cedar City, UT
SA1 Technology, Gilbert, AZ PROJECTS COMPLETED
Target Financial Complex, Tempe, AZ WITH KEYTEAM MEMBERS:
Target Financial Building A & B ATS Power
Metering, AZ SU - Site Lighting Study
Target Financial Lighting Control, AZ hite Tank Cell Site
erizon Crown DAS Hotel Durango Jail
Target Financial IT Room Cooling Changes, AZ HW System Upgrade
• Target Financial Building A Workstation Destiny springs behaVoral Health
Additions, AZ handler Regional Medical Center IR-
Target Financial Interiors Group Office RF Labs
Additions, AZ ucson VA Hospital npatient Mental
Truxton Office, Bakersfield, CA Health Addition
i t
.1_.....e/Laboratory
Bs iner Ironwood (Various Projects), Queen
Creek AZ
Cans Life Sciences (Various Projects),
Phoenix, AZ

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTNG ENGINEE RS
KEY TEAM MEMBERS
FAWSON, RE., LEED AP
Senior Project Engineer
With 38 years of electrical engineering experience, Elaine Fawson
brings strong communication skills and a commitment to proactive
project management. As a seasoned Project Manager, she excels
at power distribution systems, auxiliary systems, security systems,
lighting design, electrical site utilities, fire alarm lighting controls, voice
/ data, change order review and construction administration.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE (partial list)
Project: Arizona State University Exterior Lighting Study,
Tempe, Arizona EDUCATION
Role: Project Manager Brigham Young University
Size: ASU Campus 1973-1977
Schedule: 2016 - Current University of Utah, Electrical
Engineering
Complexity: Inventory and map existing exterior light fixtures in 1990-1992
GIS format. Locate lighting control locations and SLCC, AAS Degree, Electrical
power sources. Survey condition of existing lighting & Industrial
equipment. Measure and map existing lighting levels. Electronics (E1E), 1994
Develop recommendations for reducing energy Fundamentals of Lighting,
consumption. Develop campus lighting guidelines. 1ESNA ED100
Identify architectural lighting opportunities for historic Buss Fuse
buildings. Provide cost estimates. SLOG Technology Certification
Solar Photovoltaic Energy
Project: Chandler Regional Medical Center 1R-RF Labs Systems
Chandler, Arizona AutoCAD 2011
Role: Project Engineer PROFESSIONAL
Size: 2,400 Square Feet REGISTRATIONS
Schedule: 2017 - Current Licensed Professional
Engineer: Arizona License
Complexity: Remodel existing hospital laboratory spaces into new #44187
operating room with interventional radiology equipment,
and new radio frequency treatment space. Survey PROFESSIONAL
existing emergency and normal power distribution for EXPERIENCE
electrical capacity for new equipment. Design normal Senior Electrical Engineer,
and emergency power for IR and RF equipment. Van Boerurn & Frank
Design lighting and lighting controls meeting current Associates, 201 3 to Present
HealthCare and NEC codes, Associate Principal at Ken
Garner Engineering, 2011 —
Project: Cache County Maintenance Facilities Master Plan 2013
Role: Project Engineer Vice President of BNA
Size: 60,000 Square Feet Structure, plus site Consulting Engineers, 1996
to 2011
Schedule: 01/2017 - 04/2017
Project Engineer at Spectrum
Complexity: Master plan electrical and telephone site utilities and Professional Services, Inca
service for each of the six individual buildings. Provide
electrical construction cost estimates. 1978 to 1996.

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
(,EY TEAM MEMBERS
LANE 4, RE., LEED AP
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE - continued - Intermountain Medical Center BSL-3 Lab
Courts/Government/Detention Exhaust Modification, UT
- Government Office Building Hawaii Budding Intermountain Primary Children's Hospital
6470 Fire Alarm Upgrade, H Parking Structure Exhaust Fan Remodel, UT
• Government Office Building Hawaii Building University Health Care Redwood Clinic, UT
B-39 HVAC Upgrade, HI University Health Care Command Center
• Naval Facilities Engineering Command Relocation, Salt Lake City, UT
(NAVFAC) Hawaii Warehouse Daylighting University Health Care San-I-Pack Services,
Project, Hickam, HI UT
• Hawaii Pier Lighting at Pearl Harbor, Oahu, HI Salt Lake City Behavioral Hospital Generator
• Wendover Tactical Unmanned Anal Vehicle
(TUAV) Hangar Remodel, VVE,,,„ndover, UT Study, UT
• Salt Lake City Courts HVAC Remodel, UT Southeast Idaho Public Health, Pocatello, ID
• Utah Department of Correction State Prison
Lone Peak & Timpanogos Air Handler
Replacement, Draper, UT
- West Jordan Fire and Police Station, UT
Office Buildings/Admink
• 21st Century HeaithCare, 525 Alameda
Building, AZ
• 21st Century HealthCare Suite 101-102 Bldg,
455 Production Areas, AZ
• Cache County Truck Wash Bay, UT
Intermountain Supply Chain Center Pharmacy
Remodel, Murray, UT
• Intermountain Supply Chain Imaging
Equipment Level 2 Remodel, Murray, UT
• Intermountain Supply Chain Phase 3, UT
• NAVFAC — Hawaii Warehouse Daylighting
Project, HI
• Phoenix Formulations Building 465 Expansion,
AZ
• Ron VVood Park Maintenance Building, UT PROJECTS COMPLETED
WITH KEY TEAM MEMBERS:
Healthcare/Laboratory
• Destiny Springs Behavioral Health, AZ ASU - Site Light ng Study
• Dignity Health Chandler Regional Medical Destiny Springs Behavioral Heal
Center IR-RF Labs, AZ Chandler Regional Medical Cent
IR-RF Labs
• 21st Century Healthcare, 525 Alameda 21st Century Healthcare 525
Building, AZ
• 21st Century HealthCare Suite 101-102 Bldg, Alameda Building
455 Production Areas, AZ
• Intermountain Supply Chain Imaging
Equipment Level 2 Remodel, UT

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
KEY TEAM MEMBERS
ELI VALDEZ
Senior Project Designer
Mr, Valdez has 21 years of engineering and design experience that
includes electrical, commercial and industrial power systems. His
experience includes healthcare facilities, office buildings, modular projects,
K-12 and higher education projects, retail buildings, production plants,
distribution/warehouse facilities, churches, restaurants and single/multi-
family residences, Expertise includes electrical power systems, arc flash
studies, emergency power, selective coordination studies, interior and
exterior lighting and controls, photometric studies, public address systems,
paging/nurse call systems, and fire alarms,
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
Project: Arizona State University Exterior Lighting Study, EDUCATION
Tempe, Arizona
Role: Senior Project Designer B.S., Electrical Engineering,
DeVry University, 1996
Size: ASU Campus
Schedule: 2016 - Current PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
Complexity: Inventory and map existing exterior light fixtures in GIS
format, Locate lighting control locations and power Van Boerum & Frank
sources. Survey condition of existing lighting equipment. Associates, Inc., Nov.
Measure and map existing lighting levels. Develop 2013-Present
recommendations for reducing energy consumption. Pearson Engineering, Jul.
Develop campus lighting guidelines. Identify architectural 2007-Nov. 2013
lighting opportunities for historic buildings. Provide cost Electrical Design
estimates, Incorporated, July 2005-Jun.
2003
Project: Durango Jail Chilled Water Upgrades Semiconductor Industry
Maricopa County, AZ Engineering Experience
Role: Senior Project Designer (ASML, SVG): 2003 — 1996
Size: 10,000 Square Feet
Schedule: 08/2014 - 09/2016
Complexity: VBFA provided the electrical and mechanical engineering
services associated with the chilled water upgrades
located at the facility's central plant. The upgrades
included new tertieJ-y eemps, control upgrades and plant/
system piping moClficee.iions.
Project: SE Juvenile Facility Heating
Maricopa County
Role: Senior Project Designer
Size: 141,000 Square Feet
Schedule: 08/2013 - 04/2014
Complexity: Upgraded two (2) hot water boilers. Controls were tied
into the existing building management system. Power
design was fairly simple because existing panels had
capacity for the new load,

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGNEERS
KEY TEAM MEMBERS
ELI VALDEZ
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE - continued
Chandler Regional Medical Center Pharmacy
C '::..:Government/Detention Upgrade, AZ
• Maricopa County Durango Jail Chilled Water Destiny Springs Behavioral Health, AZ
Control Upgrades, AZ Great Basin Surgery Center Facility Upgrade,
• Maricopa County Durango Jail Chilled Water AZ
Controls Phase 2, AZ Mercy Gilbert Medical Center Discharge Unit,
Maricopa County Durango Jail Domestic Hot AZ
Water Heater Replacement, AZ Tricity Colorectal addition, AZ
Maricopa County SE Juvenile Facility Heating, Tucson - veterans administration Hospital
AZ Inpatient mental health addition, AZ
Office Buildings/Administration
21st Century HealthCare, 525 Alameda
Building, AZ
21st Century HealthCare Suite 101-102 Bldg.
455 Production Areas, AZ
Arizona Nutritional Supplements Morelos Final
Buildout, AZ
Arizona Nutritional Supplements Morelos
Production Room Expansion, AZ
• Arizona State University Coor Building Tenant
Improvement, AZ
Daiken International Warehouse Manufacturing
Center, AZ
Enterprise Vehicle Storage, AZ
Irgen Office Building Demolition Level 1, AZ
Irgen Office Building Demolition Level 2, AZ
Norris Air Office and Warehouse, AZ
• Pioneer Boulevard Storage, AZ
Praxis Warehouse AC, AZ
Rearview Storage Facility, AZ
• TTR Industrial Park Buildings A & C, AZ
PROJECTS COMPLETED
Healthcare/Laboratory WITH KEY TEAM MEMBERS .
- Arizona State University ECC 107 Lab, AZ
Arizona State University E125 Lab, AZ ASU - Ste Lighting Study
Arizona State University LSA Cease Lab, AZ Durango Jail HW System Upgrade
Arizona State University Health Services Destiny springs behavioral Health
Building X-Ray, AZ Chandler Regional Medical Center
Banner Health Boswell, AZ IR-RF Labs
Chandler Regional Medical Center IR-RF Labs, Tucson VA Hospital npatient Mental
AZ Health Addition
Chandler Regional Medical Center Cardio 21st Century Healthcare 52
Diagnostic Area, AZ Alameda Building
Chandler Regional Medical Center Morrison
Building Assessment, AZ

VAN BOERUM
&FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULMiG ENGINEERS
KEY TEAM MEMBERS
ARIZONA
RYAN VAN VOAST, RE.
Principal -in-Charge
BARRY HULET, RE. ELAINE FAWSON, RE.
Project Manager Senior Project Engineer
ars of Experience: 40 year ars of Experience: 38 years
ELI VALDEZ LEWIS WONG, P.E., LEED AP BD+C
Project Designer Project Engineer
ears of Experience: 11 Years Years of Experience: 10 Years
SARAHYN RE YES KEVIN CONNOR
Project Designer Project Designer
Years of Experience: 12 Yea s of Experience: 12 Yea

VAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSUL QINEERS
ATTACHMENT I - REFERENCES
Attachment 1- REFERENCE FORMAT
Maricopa County requires a minimum of four (4) references and or a maximum of seven (7) (most recently)
completed projects, which are similar in magnitude, complexity, and dollar value. This form may be replicated as
needed to be responsive to the Request for Qualifications.
1. Company Name: Maricopa County
Address: 401 W Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ
Phone Number: 602-372-4495
Facsimile Number:
Person to Contact: Leah Hanwell
(Email Address): leah.hanwell@fm.maricopa.gov
Owner's Bid # or Project #: Durango County Jail Chilled Water Upgrades
Date of Completion: 2016
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):
Chilled water upgrades located at the facility's central plant, including new pumps, control upgrades and plant/system piping modificatk
2. Company Name: LDS Church
Address: 101 S Lesueur, Mesa, AZ
Phone Number: 480-733-2093
Facsimile Number:
Person to Contact: Ryan Goettl
(Email Address): ryan.goettl@ldschurch.org
Owner's Bid # or Project #: LDS Mesa Temple (Historic) - Multiple Upgrades
Date of Completion: On Going Upgrades
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):
Multiple upgrades have been and are currently being provided. Including many existing air handlers, cooling tower replacement.
3. Company Name: Arizona Nutritional Supplements
Address: 6850 W Morelos Place, Chandler, AZ
Phone Number: 602-284-1384
Facsimile Number: 480-966-9630
Person to Contact: Fabio Contreras
(Email Address): fconteras@aznutritional.com
Owner's Bid if or Project #: Building Dehumidification
Date of Completion: 2017
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):
Provided dehumidification systems for the spaces to operate at 70 °F and 25% relative humidity.
4. Company Name: Arizona State University
Address: 1151 South Rural Road, Tempe, AZ
Phone Number: 480-226-8993
Facsimile Number: 480-965-7938
Person to Contact: Rick Martorano
(Email Address): rick.martorano@asu.edu
Owner's Bid # or Project #: E125 Lab
Date of Completion: 2016
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):
1200 SF lab designed to support the operation of three (3) Metal Organic Vapor Decomposition Units (MOCVD) for the campus.
5. Company Name: Arizona State University
Address: 1151 South Rural Road, Tempe, AZ
Phone Number: 480-727-3746 NOTE: This is a very important project to present for our entire team, however,
Facsimile Number: the department at ASU Norman works in has a "no reference" policy.
Person to Contact: Norman Yatabe
(Email Address): norman.yatabe@asu.edu
Owner's Bid # or Project #: Campus Site Lighting Study
Date of Completion: Ongoing
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):
Inventory, map, and survey existing conditions. Develop guidlines and plan to reduce energy consumption.
Provide cost estimates.

IAN BOERUM
& FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSU ENOINtERS
ATTACHMENT I - REFERENCES
Attachment 1 - REFERENCE FORMAT
Maricopa County requires a minimum of four (4) references and or a maximum of seven (7) (most recently)
completed projects, which are similar in magnitude, complexity, and dollar value. This form may be replicated as
needed to be responsive to the Request for Qualifications.
1. Company Name: Maricopa County
Address: 401 w Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ
Phone Number: 602-296-9881
Facsimile Number:
Person to Contact: Ravinder Gunnala
(Email Address): ravinder.gunnala@fm.maricopa.gov
Owner's Bid # or Project 4: Durango Campus OET Zone 2 Assessment
Date of Completion: 2012
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):
Survey the spaces, write a report of existing conditions and minimum requirements needed to accommodate new server equipment.
2. Company Name: Clarius Partners
Address: 60 E Rio Salado Pkwy., Suite 9060, Tempe AZ
Phone Number: 480-366-6005
Facsimile Number:
Person to Contact: Mark Balcius
(Email Address): mbalcius@clariuspartners.com
Owner's Bid # or PrOject 4: The Hub
Date of Completion: On Going Upgrades
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):
VBFA provided the electrical and mechanical engineering services associated with repurposing an animal science testing
3. Lompany ,laboratorv tor ame: a shell office building. The electrical service was rated for 16000A @ 480V.
Address:
Phone Number:
Facsimile Number:
Person to Contact:
(Email Address):
Owner's Bid # or Project 4:
Date of Completion:
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):
4. Company Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
Facsimile Number:
Person to Contact:
(Email Address):
Owner's Bid # or Project 4:
Date of Completion:
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):
5. Company Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
Facsimile Number:
Person to Contact:
(Email Address):
Owner's Bid # or Project :
Date of Completion:
Brief Project Description (Including Partnering Team and Owner's project name):

r •
a VAN BOERUM
• &FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ATTACHMENT 3 - SELECTED SERVICES CERTIFICATIO N
Attachment 3- SELECTED SERVICES CERTIFICATION
SELECTED SERVICES CERTIFICATION
On behalf of van Boerum & Frank Associates, Inc. (firm name), I submit that the named firm is applying for the
marked engineering fields listed below. I further certify that those fields of engineering are provided by the narm
firm in-house and are not supplied by the use of outside sub-consultants. I further submit and certify that my fin
has the appropriate licenses and registrations as required under Arizona Statute.
I IEED PROVI DED I, II.I, D PROV IDE
( \ ) I)(\)
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Byron Torgersen, P.E.
Printed
Principal
Title
May 3rd, 2017
Date

VAN BOERUM
8: FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ATTACHMENT 4- NON COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
Attachment 4- NON COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF ARIZONA
COUNTY OF MARICOPA
Byron Torgersen, P.E. being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
That he is Principal of Van_Boerurn & Frank Associates. Inc.
(Title) (Name of Business)
bidding on 171079-ROQ for the construction of Term Electrical Engineering Services in the County of Maricopa,
State of Arizona.
That, in connection with the above-mentioned project, neither he, nor anyone associated with the aforesaid business,
has, directly or indirectly, participated in any collusion, entered into any contract, combination, conspiracy or other
act in restraint of trade or commerce in violation of the provisions of A.R.S. § 34-251, Article 4, as amended.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
My Commission Expires:
LORI HAGLU'i
!II NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF ,
My Comm. Exp. 4/14/2018
(Notary Public) Commission # 676297 '
(Please ensure seal is visible)