FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY FM 2017.PDF

Created: 03/02/2017 • Last updated: 03/22/2017
General information
Organization Flood Control District of Maricopa County
Contact First name Walt
Contact Last name Kinsler
Contact e-mail waltkinsler@mail.maricopa.gov
Contact phone number 602-506-0867
Address
Street 2801 West Durango Street
City Phoenix
State Arizona
ZIP Code 85009
From what tribe is the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation
organization requesting the
grant?
Total grant amount request 100,000
1 / 1

Flood Control District Fact Sheet
About the District
The Flood Control District (FCD) was created in 1959 to reduce the risk of flooding to people y
and their property. t
n
Who are we?
u
FCD is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona. FCD is governed by a Board of Directors, o
which doubles as the County Board of Supervisors, with the advice of a citizens' Flood Control
Advisory Board. C
a
What we do?
p
! Build and maintain structures
o
! Identify and delineate floodplains
c
! Issue permits for development in floodplains i
! Operate a flood warning system in coordination with local emergency responders r
! Conduct flood hazard studies to identify risks of flooding and potential solutions, both a
structural and non-structural
M
f
How are we funded?
o
Under Arizona enabling legislation, the Flood Control District (FCD) is a special taxing district and t
is given the authority to levy a secondary property tax on property within Maricopa County. The
c
FCD's flood control tax rate for Fiscal Year 2017 is $0.1792 per $1000 of assessed valuation. At
i
this tax rate, a typical property owner with an assessed valuation of $100,000 pays an annual
r
flood control tax of $17.92. Other sources of funding vary and include: federal grants, the sale or
t
lease of properties, permit fees, and project cost-sharing with other entities.
s
The FCD's budget supports routine operations (O&M, permitting etc.) and a capital budget i
that funds the FCD's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Today, the FCD has an annual
D
operating budget of approximately $33 million, with 97 percent of the FCD's revenue coming
from the secondary tax. In Fiscal Year 2017, the the CIP budget is $68 million. Key to capital
l
projects is local cost share with governments and developers; except in unusual
o
circumstances the FCD requests at least a 50 percent cost share.
r
In 2015 the Board of Directors developed a Strategic Financial Plan for the FCD recognizing that t
significant financial constraints limit the FCD's ability to fund capital projects. As a result, varying
n
funding strategies have been implemented including emphasis on a 50/50 cost share by project
partners; a two month cash reserve mirroring the County General Fund philosophy plus, o
utilizing the remaining fund balance for capital projects. The Strategic Financial Plan has led to a C
reprioritization of the CIP procedure scoring which includes giving greater weight to:
! Project readiness and community prioritization d
! Level of partner cost share with 50/50 as the baseline standard o
! Adding economic development considerations
o
l
F
www.fcd.maricopa.gov
Rev. 1/31/17

The FCD’s responsibilities break down as follows:
Flood Hazard Identification: The FCD conducts Area Drainage Studies, and develops Watercourse Master
Plans for all of Maricopa County. These studies identify areas with flood risk as well as opportunities for potential
solutions. Delineation studies survey specific reaches of rivers and washes and accurately identify the depth and
velocity of flood waters within these water courses.
Structures: Based on flood risk priorities and funding availability, FCD builds flood control structures such as
dams , levees, channels, basins, and storm drains. The FCD cost shares on structures and maintenance with cities
and other agencies.
Floodplain Use Permits and Inspections: The FCD issues Floodplain Use Permits for: Buckeye, Carefree,
Cave Creek, Chandler, El Mirage, Gila Bend, Guadalupe, Litchfield Park, Mesa, Queen Creek, Surprise, Tolleson,
Youngtown, and Wickenburg. The County Planning and Development Department issues Floodplain Use Permits at
the One Stop Shop for unincorporated county.
The following communities have assumed floodplain management activities and permitting: Avondale, Fountain Hills,
Gilbert, Glendale, Goodyear, Paradise Valley, Peoria, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Tempe.
Why Flood Control is still needed today
During Maricopa County's early history, floods caused millions of dollars worth of damage to homes, businesses and
farmland. Continuing population growth has expanded the urban area and development within the urban core has
resulted in flooding outside of historical areas. Flooding during the 2014 monsoon storms demonstrated the need for
additional structures and controls.
Continued collaboration with citizens, municipalities, agencies and developers is vital to ensuring that people and
property remain safe from floods as the county continues to grow.
Did you know?
! Approximately 2/3 of the state’s major rivers run ! The FCD provides on-demand weather, rainfall and
through Maricopa County (Agua Fria River, Gila streamflow information for use by cities and county
River, Salt River, Verde River, Hassayampa River). emergency departments and National Weather
! Service. This includes 321 auto-matic rain gages,
Structures operated and maintained by the FCD:
199 automatic stream gages, and 38 automatic
,22 dams weather stations.
,370 acres of basins
,122 ! An average of 519 floodplain use permits are
miles of channels
processed by the county each year.
,60+ additional structures (levees, drains, etc.)
! ! The Small Project Assistance Program which
Flood hazard identification studies have been
provides up to $250K match for small flood projects
completed for over 45 percent (3,600 sq. miles) of
is available for municipalities that need rapid
the county.
implementation. The Fiscal Year 2016 program
! Floodplain delineation studies have been includes $3 million for 16 projects that mitigate
completed for 68 percent (4,000 miles) of county flood hazards that are local in nature and pose a risk
rivers and washes. to a small number of citizens and property.
! The County has participated in the National Flood ! Note: The FCD coordinates with multiple federal,
Insurance Program's Community Rating System state and local agencies and implements the
since 1991. Through the FEMA accreditation requirements of the Federal Emergency
process, the County is now at Class 4, which gives Management Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of
residents of unincorporated Maricopa County up to Engineers and the Arizona Department of Water
a 30 percent discount on their flood insurance. Resources, and coordinates with the National
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) on
rehabbing five major structures which now protect
areas of urban growth.
2801 West Durango Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85009 (602) 506-1501

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application 2017
Mrs. Selena Castaneda
Tribal Secretary
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Tribal Council
P.O. Box 17779
Fountain Hills, AZ 85269
Regarding: Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation for 2017 Arizona Benefits Fund Grant
Dear Mrs. Selena Castaneda,
The Flood Control District of Maricopa County (District) is pleased to present the Phase II Buckfire
Revegetation proposal (Project) to the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation for 2017 Arizona Benefits Fund
Grant (the Grant) funding. This Project will apply a revegetation strategy to manage invasive saltcedar to
a 44-acre portion of the Buckfire that in June of 2005 burned approximately 570 acres in the Gila River
between Rocks Road and Watson Road alignments south of Buckeye, Arizona. The Buckfire occurred on
Public Land Order 1015 (PLO 1015) properties managed by the Arizona Game and Fish Department.
Spencer Bolan, a planner with the District will be the project manager and main point of contact for the
Grant. He will head up a team of dedicated District professionals that will include Doug Williams,
Planning Branch Manager, Theresa Pinto, District Ecologist and Project Manager, Kaylee Colter, District
Landscape Architect, and Bob Stevens, District Environmental Program Analysist. This core team will be
supplemented with appropriate District maintenance staff, contracted consultants, and contractors to
assist in the successful completion of the Grant.
Spencer’s contact information:
Spencer Bolen, Planner
Planning and Project Management Division
Flood Control District of Maricopa County
2801 W. Durango Street
Phoenix, AZ 85009
spencerbolen@mail.maricopa.gov
602-506-4064 (office)
Sincerely,
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application 2017
A. Narrative
1. The proposed program or project, and whether it is a new or continuing project:
The primary goal of the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation 2017 Arizona Benefits Fund Grant is to help fund a portion
of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County’s (District) efforts to revegetate Buckfire Phase II (the Project).
This is a continuation of a revegetation effort, Buckfire Phase I, that the District implemented in 2006-2007 as a
result of the June 2005 Buckfire that burned approximately 570-acres in the Gila River between Rocks Road and
Watson Road alignments south of Buckeye, Arizona. Buckfire Phase I removed about 50-acres of seared saltcedar
and replanted the area with native riparian species at a site located just west of Miller Road alignment
approximately one-mile south of Hazen Road in Buckeye, Arizona. Buckfire Phase I was on Public Land Order 1015
(PLO 1015) properties managed by the Arizona Game and Fish Department.
Buckfire Phase II is approximately 44-acres southwest of Buckfire Phase I (see Exhibit A – attached) and is also on
PLO 1015 lands managed by Arizona Game and Fish Department. The District will replace the saltcedar with high-
valued, appropriately selected, native riparian vegetation to promote flood and fire protection within the Gila
River. In addition to restoring proper hydrologic conditions and functions, the Project will also provide habitats for
wildlife including threatened and endangered species such as the Southwest Willow Flycatcher, Yuma Clapper Rail
and Yellow-Billed Cuckoo.
An Adaptive Management plan will be employed once the implementation phase is completed. This will include
long-term maintenance and monitoring for the purposes of documenting the natural succession of the restored
environment and to document how native habitats react to restoration efforts. The knowledge gained will be
shared with land managers throughout the southwest tasked with controlling saltcedar infested areas.
2. The purpose of the program or project and how it meets one or more of Fort McDowell’s funding priorities
(i.e., education, public safety, health, environment, and economic and community development):
The Buckfire Phase II will incorporate the El Rio Vegetation Management Plan (the Plan) that the District
completed in 2016 with the assistance of a Gila River Indian Community 12% Gaming grant. The Plan uses a
science-based approach to removing invasive non-native saltcedar from the El Rio reach of the Gila River and
replaces them with appropriately selected native riparian and upland vegetation to help reduce the floodplain,
decrease fire hazards, and improve wildlife habitats. The City of Buckeye recently removed about 40- acres of fire-
torched saltcedar from their property just north of the Buckfire Phase I project. Much of the saltcedar not killed by
the fire has sprouted back. This growth has helped to stabilize soils and provide some cover for wildlife, but the
increased fuel load is subject to reigniting. In addition, the pending arrival of the Tamarisk Leaf Beetle (Diorhabda
elongata) could impact wildlife and increase fire hazards amplifying the need to implement strategies that can
counter these risks.
Over the last century nearly 95 percent of native riparian forests in Arizona have been lost partially as a result of
the infestation of saltcedar (Tamaricaceae family) a non-native species introduce in the 1800’s for erosion control,
wind breaks, and ornamental horticulture purposes. Saltcedar crowds out native vegetation, increases fire risk,
impedes flood flows, impacts the biological health of the floodplain, and limits recreational access to rivers and
washes. As a result of its prolific spread, the United States Department of Agriculture around 2002 introduced the
Tamarisk Leaf Beetle as a biological control agent in several western states. The Beetle is expected to arrive in the
Lower Gila River by 2019. The Beetle is expected to leave dead woody saltcedar biomass along riparian
environments that will likely change the micro-climate temperature and humidity in the area, increased fire risk,
and disturb wildlife habitats including those of threatened and endangered species.
The Gila River drains nearly half of the state of Arizona and includes many significant tributaries, including the San
Pedro, Santa Cruz, and Salt Rivers. Historically, the Gila River was one of the few perennially-watered riparian
areas of the Sonoran Desert where a rich mosaic of Cottonwood - Willow Gallery Forest and Mesquite Bosques
supported a wide variety of wildlife species.

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application 2017
Over time, the lower Gila River watershed changed when the natural flow patterns and springtime flooding were
interrupted by upstream dams, groundwater pumping, agricultural and urban development. This has significantly
impacted important riparian habitats and provided an opportunity for invasive species such as saltcedar to
colonize and flourish.
3. The partners in the program or project, and other entities providing funding and support (please indicate
whether the organization will be submitting applications to any other tribes):
In 1999, the cities of Avondale, Goodyear, and Buckeye, in conjunction with the Flood Control District of Maricopa
County (District), the Maricopa County Parks and Recreation and Planning and Development departments,
engaged landowners, and other interested public agencies created a vision they called El Rio, (“The River”). Their
goal was to help stimulate economic development in the southwest valley by restoring the functionality of the Gila
River through the improvement of riparian (i.e. wetland) wildlife habitat, water quality, and flood control. They
also wanted to explore environmental education and recreational opportunities to serve the public. The El Rio
project begins at the confluence of the Agua Fria and spans about 17.5 miles downstream to the SR85 Bridge.
While the Gila River may never be restored to its pre-historic condition, opportunities exist to enhance the River.
In 2006, the El Rio Watercourse Master Plan (WCMP) was completed and serves as a roadmap to realizing the El
Rio vision. It was adopted through the El Rio Memorandum of Understanding entered into by the District, and the
Cities of Avondale, Goodyear, and Buckeye.
4. The need that the program or project aims to fulfill, the population targeted, and the estimated number of
people who will be served by the grant:
At the present time there is no coordinated effort for removing saltcedar along the Gila River. Saltcedar
eradication projects are currently completed in a piecemeal fashion by public agencies that understand the risk
saltcedar infestation poses. By using the Vegetation Management Plan to remove the saltcedar and revegetate
the Buckfire Phase II area with native riparian plant species the District will demonstrate management techniques
on how to successfully eradicate saltcedar vegetation and establish a maintenance and monitoring program that
will provide valuable information to the District and the several hundred land managers tasked with controlling
saltcedar infestation along not only on the Gila River, but waterways throughout the southwestern United States.
Saltcedar problems are not unique to the Gila River or just Arizona waterways. The hundreds possibly thousands
of people who could benefit from this Project’s lessons learned spans nearly a dozen southwestern states as well
as across international borders into northern Mexico. By revitalizing the River and restoring a significant part of
Arizona’s natural heritage, the Buckfire Phase II project provides another step to stimulating economic
development as well as passive recreation, environmental education, and eco-tourism activities in the Southwest
Valley for thousands of citizens and visitors.
When the Vegetation Management Plan is fully implemented, the flood risk for at least 500 people currently living
or farming within the El Rio reach of the Gila River floodplain will be reduced. It will also reduce the fire hazards to
residents, their homes and associated property structures, wildlife, and critical infrastructure such as the SRP
powerlines that run along the western edge of Buckfire Phase II.
5. The timetable for implementation of the program or project:
Task #1: Site Assessment: November 2017 – February 2018
Task #2: Planting Plan: March 2018 - June 2018
Task #3: Conduct Cultural Survey: April 2018 – June 2018
Task #4: Prepare Permit Applications: July 2018 – August 2018
Task #5: Native Plant Collection & Propagation: May 2018 – August 2019
Task #6: Develop Adaptive Management Plan (Maintenance and Monitoring): September 2018 – December 2018
Task #7: Saltcedar Removal: December 2018 – February 2020
Task #8: Clear, Grub & Grade: October 2019 – December 2019
Task #9: Plant and Hydroseed: December 2019 - March 2020
Task #10: Administer Adaptive Management Plan (Maintenance and Monitoring): December 2019 – December
2021

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application 2017
A statement addressing the need for long-term funding (if applicable).
The Buckfire Phase II project will cost $457,173 and take several years to complete. The design and
implementation phases will take approximately two years and once implemented an adaptive management plan
will be executed for an additional two years to maintain and monitor the project’s progress.
The District is asking for $100,000 Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation for 2017 Arizona Benefits Fund Grant.
These funds will be combined with the District’s four-year commitment to fund the Buckfire Phase II project
through their operating budget. These combined funds will go towards all tasks needed to design, implement, and
execute long-term adaptive management efforts for the duration of the Buckfire Phase II project.
To the Districts knowledge, no other Project Partner will be submitting grant applications for the any 12% Gaming
Grants to help with the Buckfire Phase II project.

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application
Attachment 1:
Detailed Budget Breakdown:
Task #1: Site Assessment
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Principal Scientist/Ecologist 215.00/hr. 10 2,150.00
Riparian Ecologist 155.00/hr. 120 18,600.00
Geomorphologist 155.00/hr. 50 7,750.00
Wildlife Biologist 115.00/hr. 30 3,450.00
GIS Analyst and Cartographer 90.00/hr. 75 6,750.00
Scientist/Admin 1 60.00/hr. 35 2,100.00
Environmental Program Analyst 52.00/hr. 40 2,080.00
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 10 340.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Soil Samples 150.00 10 1,500.00
each
Total $45,600.00
Task #2: Planting Plan
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 60 2,640.00
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 150 5,100.00
CAD Technician 30.00/hr. 150 4,500.00
Environmental Program Analyst 52.00/hr. 8 416.00
Planner 32.00/hr. 15 480.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Total $13,576.00
Task #3: Preparing Permit Applications
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Principal Scientist/Ecologist 215.00/hr. 10 2,150.00
Geomorphologist 155.00/hr. 40 6,200.00
Riparian Ecologist 155.00/hr. 100 15,500.00
Wildlife Biologist 115.00/hr. 60 6,900.00
GIS Analyst and Cartographer 92.00/hr. 90 8,280.00
Scientist/Admin 1 60.00/hr. 15 900.00
Environmental Program Analyst 52.00/hr. 20 1,040.00
Planner 32.00/hr. 8 256.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 20 880.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Total $42,546.00
Task # 4: Cultural Survey
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application
Archeologist (Contract) L.S. 1 30,000.00
Environmental Program Analyst 52.00/hr. 20 1,040.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 5 220.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Total $31,700.00
Task #5: Plant Collection & Initial Propagation
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Laborer 26.00/hr. 30 780.00
Laborer 26.00/hr. 30 780.00
Nursery Tech 35.00/hr. 90 3,150.00
Equipment Operator 35.00/hr. 10 350.00
Tree Guards 135/roll 2 270.00
Misc. Supplies 1,500.00 1 1,500.00
Equipment (Auger) 45.00/day 4 180.00
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 80 2,720.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Total $10,610.00
Task #5b: Propagation Oversight and Data Collection
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Labor 26.00/hr. 100 2,600.00
Nursery Tech 35.00/hr. 250 8,750.00
Equipment Operator 35.00/hr. 10 350.00
Tree Guards 135.00/roll 1 135.00
Misc. Supplies 500.00 1 500.00
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 150 5,100.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Total $17,875.00
Task #6: Develop Adaptive
Management Plan
Maintenance Plan:
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Environmental Program Analyst 52.00/hr. 20 1,040.00
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 30 1,020.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 60 2,640.00
Planner 32.00/hr. 20 640.00
Riparian Ecologist 155.00/hr. 30 4,650.00
Wildlife Biologist 115.00/hr. 20 2,300.00
Maintenance Division Manager 57.00/hr. 30 1,710.00
Pesticide Applicator 33.00/hr. 15 495.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 410.00
Total $14,905.00
Monitoring Plan
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application
Environmental Program Analyst 52.00/hr. 20 1,04000
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 30 1,020.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 60 2,640.00
Planner 32.00/hr. 20 640.00
Riparian Ecologist 155.00/hr. 30 4,650.00
Wildlife Biologist 115.00/hr. 20 2,300.00
Maintenance Division Manager 57.00/hr. 30 1,710.00
Pesticide Applicator 33.00/hr. 15 495.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Total $14,905.00
Task #7: Saltcedar Removal
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Equipment Operator 35.00/hr. 480 16,800.00
Water Truck Rental 400.00/day 30 12,000.00
Bulldozer Rental 850.00/day 30 25,500.00
Potable Water Meter w/BFP & Lock, 2,500.00 L.S. 2,500.00
Maintenance Division Manager 57.00/hr. 30 1,710.00
Pesticide 125.00/gal. 15 1,875.00
Pesticide Applicator 33.00/hr. 240 7,920.00
Laborer 26.00/hr. 200 5,200.00
Planner 32.00/hr. 5 160.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 20 880.00
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 40 1,360.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Total $76,345.00
Task #8: Clear and Grub
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Equipment Operator 35.00/hr. 480 16,800.00
Water Truck Rental 400.00/day 30 12,000.00
Bulldozer Rental 850.00/day 30 25,500.00
Potable Water Meter w/BFP & Lock, 2,500.00 L.S. 2,500.00
Maintenance Division Manager 57.00/hr. 30 1,710.00
Planner 32.00/hr. 15 480.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 30 1,320.00
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 40 1,360.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 10 440.00
Total $62,110.00
Task #9 Plant and Hydroseed
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Hydroseed 3,000/ac 20 60,000.00
Water Truck 400.00/day 20 8,000.00
Maintenance Division Manager 57.00/hr. 30 1,710.00
Environmental Program Analyst 52.00/hr. 10 520.00
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 60 2,040.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 20 880.00

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application
Surveyor 30.00/hr. 24 720.00
Total $73,870.00
Task #10: Administer Adaptive
Management Plan
Description Unit Cost Qty. Total
Environmental Program Analyst 52.00/hr. 480 2,496.00
Pesticide Applicator 33.00/hr. 240 7,920.00
Pesticide 125.00/gal. 60 7,500.00
Laborer 26.00/hr. 720 18,720.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 50 2,200.00
Landscape Architect 34.00/hr. 60 2,040.00
Landscape Architect 44.00/hr. 25 1,100.00
Planner 32.00/hr. 60 1,920.00
Riparian Ecologist 155.00/hr. 15 2,325.00
Wildlife Biologist 115.00/hr. 20 2,300.00
Maintenance Division Manager 57.00/hr. 50 2,850.00
Project Manager 44.00/hr. 40 1,760.00
Total 53,131.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST $457,173.00
Work Descriptions:
Task #1: Site Assessment - $45,600.00:
Description: The District will contract with Stillwater Sciences to conduct on-site field
assessment of the Project Pilot site. Ground-truth and revise as necessary the vegetation
management unit boundaries identified for the Pilot Project area in the Vegetation Management
Plan; Map and record saltcedar age, density, and cover; Identify specific access routes and
accessibility issues for heavy equipment and long-term monitoring and maintenance activities,
including landowner access and geographic barriers; Map and record notable topographic
features, ditches, and other features: Map and record cover, density, and diversity of native
vegetation to be conserved and to guide planting palettes; Map and record cover and diversity
of other noxious weeds; Evaluate suitable habitat features/characteristics to determine potential
for special-status species and nesting birds to occur on site and need for pre-treatment surveys
for endangered species and/or whether other protective measures may be needed during
project implementation; Evaluate channel stability upstream, downstream, and across the
channel, to understand potential geomorphic consequences of saltcedar removal and identify
the need for a “hydraulic shield” of conserved saltcedar or other measures needed to reduce the
risk of habitat enhancement plantings being scoured or damaged from high flow events;
Document hydrology/water availability, including surface flow patterns and likely depths to
groundwater; Sample for soil conditions (e.g., texture, salinity, nutrients), to determine the need
for soil amendments (collect and submitted for (a fertility) analysis up to 3 samples from each
Vegetation Unit type);
Purpose: To evaluate opportunities, constraints, and overall feasibility and sustainability of the
specific Vegetation Management Units as defined by the Vegetation Management Plan for the
Pilot Project site, and to provide critical information to help inform and direct the Planting Plan.
Deliverable Description: The results of the site assessment will be summarized in a
memorandum to help document the basis for the Planting Plan. The memorandum will also
provide realistic objectives for the results of the site assessment, budget, and timeline that can
be used as the basis for project monitoring and performance evaluation

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application
Task #2: Planting Plan - $13,576.00:
Description: Develop a plant installation plan that identifies all the specific plant species, their
size, and location to be planted. Illustrate the limits of hydroseed and identify the seed mix
types using information generated in Task 1 and the Vegetation Management Plans (VMP).
Purpose: To implement the VMP’s Vegetation Management Units (VMU) with appropriate plant
species in the desired densities and locations to achieve the most desirable ecological
restoration of the Pilot Project site.
Deliverable Description: A map graphically illustrating appropriate plant species in the desired
densities per the Plan.
Task #3: Preparing Permit Applications - $42,546.00
Description: Stillwater will develop documentation necessary for permit application
development and permit acquisition for the Pilot Project. The objective of the Preparing Permit
Application, which will be to facilitate the District-led permitting effort, discussions with permitting
agencies, and completion of permitting application requirements. Based on the Planting Plan
package (map/AutoCAD drawings, tamarisk removal specifications, and planting plan),
Stillwater will write a description of the Pilot Project suitable for inserting into individual permit
application packages and serving as the basis for potential impact assessments. In addition to
describing the primary elements of the project, as presented in the Planting Plan design
map/AutoCAD drawings, the project description will include the tamarisk removal and planting
methods; approximate schedule for implementation, maintenance, and monitoring activities; and
best management practices (BMPs) and resource protection measures that will be employed
during the project to avoid or reduce impacts to environmental resources. The project
description will be revised in light of District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE, the
presumed lead agency for permitting), and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) comments.
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD): Stillwater will prepare a map of waters and
wetlands in the Pilot Project area that are potentially subject to the jurisdiction of the USACE.
The map will meet USACE minimum standards, be suitable for submittal to the Arizona
Department of Environment Quality for Section 401 water quality certification, and be derived
from one of the delineations of jurisdictional waters and wetlands that were developed for the El
Rio planning reach using a combination of aerial photography interpretation and hydraulic
modeling results. It is anticipated that the delineation based on an approximately 10-year flow
event will be used, so that the area under USACE jurisdiction is maximized, but the delineation
based on an approximately 2-year flow event could be used as well. (Both extents have been
used previously in USACE-approved projects in the El Rio planning reach.) The methods for
developing the map will be described in a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) form,
and the map will be used to fill in the required sections of the PJD form. It is assumed that the
delineation based on aerial photography interpretation and hydraulic modeling will be sufficient
for USACE, and that sample points for wetlands, any other field-based data collection, or an
associated wetland delineation report (which described wetland sample point results) will not be
necessary, due to the fact that the Gila River channel is the only potential jurisdictional feature
in Pilot Project. The delineation map and PJD form will be revised based on District and
USACE comments and includes responses to USACE additional information request and/or
conference call meeting(s).
Biological Resources Evaluation: Stillwater will prepare a Biological Resources Evaluation
report. The southwestern willow flycatcher, western yellow-billed cuckoo, Yuma clapper rail, and
migratory birds will be the focus of the report. The effects analysis will be based on the project
description the evaluation of habitat features conducted during the site assessment, and the
results of any wildlife surveys in or nearby to Pilot Project (e.g., AGFD’s summer 2016 bird

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application
surveys for the District). The report will provide the information necessary for consultation with
USFWS; if the project description suggests that one or more of the anticipated focal species
may be negatively affected by the project and that formal consultation with USFWS may be
necessary, the report will be titled a Biological Assessment (BA). Purpose: To complete all
permitting application requirements as applied to the Pilot Project’s potential temporary,
permanent, indirect, and cumulative effects on relevant species protected under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA), Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), and/or Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act., the Army Corps of Engineer’s Clean Water Act 404 Permit, the State, of
Arizona’s Clean Water Act 402 permit, the County’s Dust Permit and Floodplain Permit.
Deliverable Description: Biological Resources Evaluation Report Draft USACE submission of
project description, PJD, and Biological Resources Evaluation. Draft USFWS submission of
project description and Biological Resources Evaluation. Final PJD submission to USACE, Final
project description and Biological Resources Evaluation submission to USFWS.
Task #4: Conduct Cultural Survey - $31,700.00:
Description: The District will consult with The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to see
if they would consider issuing a letter of “No Impact” since the construction activities will occur
within the floodway where the ground has been forcibly impacted due to major flooding. The
District will have an archeologist on site during any ground disturbance activities to monitor for
cultural resources. If SHPO rejects issuing the Letter of No Impact then the District is prepared
to hire an archeologist from their on-call list to perform a Cultural Survey of the Pilot Project.
Purpose: The SHPO clearance letter is required for inclusion in the Army Corps of Engineer’s
Nation Wide Permit #27.
Deliverable Description: If required, The District’s on-call archeologist will submit a Cultural
Survey that meets the requirements of SHPO. Alternatively a letter of “No Impact” would be
submitted if approved by SHPO followed up with an on-site monitoring report for the
Implementation Phase.
Task #5: Native Plant Collection and Propagation - $28,485.00:
Description: The District will propagate identified species to supply pole plantings for
revegetating the site. Initial plants will be propagated early on to allow time to establish the stock
material that will be utilized for implementation during Task 9. Material will be propagated at the
District nursery and/or an appropriate site. Work completed under this task includes: Conduct
site analysis to identify existing species that can be a source for seed or cuttings Conduct field
work to collect the required seed and/or cuttings Propagate and plant species that will be used
for stock material for the Pilot Project
Purpose: The propagation protocols developed during this task will be used produce native
plants for future riparian revegetation efforts conducted by the District. Collections of
appropriate native plants using specimens propagated from locally adapted parent material will
increase the projects survivability and chances for success.
Deliverable Description: The District will propagate plant species, record the quantities
planted, and document the plantings with photographs.
Task #6: Develop Adaptive Management Plan - $29,810.00:
Description: Develop a set of restoration maintenance guidelines that follow all permit
requirements and best management practices to achieve the greatest habitat values possible.
The Maintenance Plan activities are to work in collaboration with the Monitoring Plan and will be
for a five-year period initially, but will be extended if sustainable results have not been achieved.
Tamarisk retreatment, and replacement plantings or alternative plantings are alternatives that

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application
will be evaluated during the maintenance period based on the achievement results. The
saltcedar removal process, pre and post-treatment of seedings and re-sprouts along with
mulching practices are intended to minimize establishment of saltcedar or other non-native
invasive plants. Subsequent herbicide applications over the maintenance period may be
required to achieve the desired results.
Purpose: To sustain revegetation survival and non-native invasive species (e.g. saltcedar and
secondary weed growth) suppression.
Deliverable Description: Develop a set of restoration maintenance guidelines that includes
copies of all permits, BMP’s, approved chemicals, individual photographs of non-native invasive
species.
Description: Prepare a project monitoring plan that will work in collaboration with the
Maintenance Plan based on the goals and objectives of Pilot Project and requirements of the
permitting agency. Additionally, the Monitoring Plan activities will include evaluating how
effective the treatment and revegetation methods were pre and post beetle colonization, identify
the amount of occupied or highly suitable T&E critical habitats were protected and or created by
the Project and report on the extent of the overall habitat recovery over a five-year monitoring
period.
Purpose: The monitoring plan will provide the parameters or metrics to be monitored. The
primary metrics to be monitored and described in the plan will be tamarisk resprouting, survival
of habitat enhancement plantings, natural recruitment by both native and nonnative plants, and
native vegetation cover (as an indicator of habitat development). Monitoring metrics for depth to
groundwater and wildlife surveys will be described as well as action steps in the event and T&E
species are encountered. Deliverable Description: The monitoring plan will provide the
parameters or metrics to be monitored as defined by permitting agencies and complemented by
the Districts team of riparian ecologist, wildlife biologist, and landscape architects. The plan will
monitor tamarisk resprouting, survival of habitat enhancement plantings, natural recruitment by
both native and nonnative plants, and native vegetation cover (as an indicator of habitat
development). Additional monitoring metrics, such as depth to groundwater and wildlife
surveys, may be recommended and described. The monitoring plan will describe monitoring
methods and reporting, a monitoring schedule and duration, and description of adaptive
management strategies applicable to the maintenance operations, monitoring activities, or
changed site conditions in response to the overall health of the Project’s ecosystem.
Task #7: Saltcedar Removal - $76,345.00:
Description: Identify limits, quantity and saltcedar eradication methodologies for the specific
VMU’s as identified on the Pilot Project Planting Plan. Spraying of approved herbicide will cover
two full growing seasons. Obtain dust permit, post sign and implement the Stormwater Pollution
Protection Plan. Purpose: To prepare the site for restoration
Deliverable Description: The site has been eradicated of saltcedar from the Bridge
Clearance, Saltcedar Treatment and Riparian Enhancement, and Saltcedar per the Pilot Project
Planting Plan. Spraying of herbicide will cover two full growing seasons.
Task #8: Clear, Grub, & Grade - $62,110.00:
Description: Remove all undesirable and or non-native vegetation from the site and prepare for
planting operations and hydroseeding. Obtain dust permit, post sign and implement the
Stormwater Pollution Protection Plan.
Purpose: To prepare the Pilot Project site for restoration Implementation activities.
Deliverable Description: The site will be ready to begin installing the planting plan
Task #9: Plant & Hydroseed - $73,870.00:

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Grant Application
Description The District will implement revegetation with native species following the Planting
Plan developed for the project site. Plant material will come from a combination of plants
propagated during Task 5/6 and via hydroseed application. Planting of propagated plant
material will be completed by internal O&M Staff. A qualified contractor will be selected to apply
the hydroseed using FCDMC specifications.
Purpose: Promote the establishment of a self-sustaining native plant community in areas where
Saltcedar has been removed by planting native species.
Deliverable Description: The District will schedule staff to plant native species and hire a
contractor to apply hydroseed. Documentation of completed tasks will be provided via
photographs and written reports.
Task #10: Administer Adaptive Management Plan - $53,131.00:
Description: The District will apply the prescribed Adaptive Management activities outlined in
the Adaptive Management Plan (specific Maintenance and Monitoring Plans). The District staff
will document activities; schedules, methods, equipment, crews, the potential or existence of
any T&E species, actions if a resident T&E species is identified, impact of the TLB to the Project
area including plant life, wildlife, and river functions, as well as an overall assessment of the
overall health of the restored riparian ecosystem. Administering the Adaptive Management Plan
will be done over a minimum of twenty years and modified based on the restored site’s natural
succession.
Purpose: To maintain and track the success of the Project restoration efforts with the ability to
implement adaptive management strategies when necessary to improve the ecosystems health,
divert a reduction in habitat value (i.e. removal of nonnative vegetation), or react to the presence
of T&E species. This Task will also provide an opportunity to document and convey to
landowners improved methods of how riparian restoration projects are designed, constructed
and maintained.
Deliverable Description: The District will provide overall maintenance and monitoring of the
Project area as required in the Maintenance and Monitoring Plans. The District will provide
documentation of their maintenance activities and with the help of Stillwater Sciences evaluate
the overall health of the restored ecosystem in an Adaptive Management monitoring report. The
report will describe monitoring methods and reporting, a monitoring schedule and duration, and
description of adaptive management strategies that may be appropriate based on monitoring
results and will comply with the submittal and data requirements of the permitting agencies. In
addition, the report will be submitted not less than annually to the Arizona Water Protection
Fund project manager for the contract duration. Administering the Adaptive Management Plan
may be modified due to permitting requirements or changed site conditions to maximize habitat
values and available restoration resources.