16022-CONTRACT PHASE 2.PDF

DESIGN BID BUILD (DBB)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2)
Office of Procurement Services
Serial # 1 6022 -RFQ
Contract # 16022 -RFQ
C-70-
Project # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA
AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
-For-
DESIGN, BID-BUILD (DBB)
PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD
THIS AGREEMENT made this 20th day of July in the year 2016 .
BY AND BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA, hereinafter called the "Owner,"
and DLR Group hereinafter called the "Design Professional" or "DP."
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth
herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, do covenant
and agree as follows:
PROJECT NAME: Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2)
PROJECT NUMBER: 16022-RFQ
CONTRACT NUMBER: 16022-RFQ
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 2
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE #
SCOPE OF WORK 4
ARTICLE 1: DEFINITIONS 5
ARTICLE 2: DP SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 8
ARTICLE 3: SUBCONSULTANTS 19
ARTICLE 4: OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 20
ARTICLE 5: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND REVIEW PROCEDURE 20
ARTICLE 6: BASIS OF COMPENSATION 21
ARTICLE 7: PAYMENTS TO DP 23
ARTICLE 8: INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE 23
ARTICLE 9: PERFORMANCE 26
ARTICLE 10: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 26
ARTICLE 11: ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 27
ARTICLE 12: SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION 31
ARTICLE 13: MISCELLANEOUS 32
EXHIBIT 'A': HOURLY RATE AND HOURS 39
EXHIBIT 'B': DP Proposal for Services 40
EXHIBIT 'C': Record Drawing Procedures 41
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page 1 3
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
SCOPE OF WORK
Design Professional ("DP") shall furnish Architectural and Engineering Services ("NE Services")
for the Project and Contract described above, upon issuance by the Director of Maricopa
County Facilities Management Department ("MCFMD") ("Director") or Director's designee of
DP's Authorization(s) to Proceed.
DP shall furnish: planning, programming, feasibility studies, Statements of Probable
Construction Cost, partial or complete design services, including preparation of bidding and
construction documents, construction contract administration and observation, review of
Contractor Change Order Requests, issuance of Construction Change Orders, review of
Baseline and updated Construction Schedules, review work prepared by other professional
consultants and the Contractor, building commissioning, and other miscellaneous NE Services
that may be required and are authorized by Owner.
The Director or Director's designee may issue an Authorization to proceed to encompass entire
Basic Services (as defined in Section 2.2 herein) for a project, or for a portion of Basic Services,
or for discretionary tasks as specified in Sections 2.3 herein Additional Services or 2.4 herein
Reimbursable Services, or any combination thereof.
The fees to be paid by Owner for the NE Services shall be:
A lump sum, not to exceed (See Section 6.1 herein). (Exhibit 'B'). However, DP shall
provide Hourly Rates and Hours (by phase and service). (See Section 6.2 herein Exhibit 'A') for
reference in the event of added services or change orders.
The Director or Director's designee will confer with DP before any Authorization to Proceed is
issued to DP to discuss the scope of the NE Services covered by the forthcoming Authorization,
the time to complete the NE Services and the fee for those NE Services, provided that, where
no agreement is reached as to the fee for a particular Authorization to Proceed, payment for
those A/E Services will be made in accordance with Section 6.1.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 4
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa Coun
Facilities Management Department
ARTICLE 1: DEFINITIONS
1.1 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Those NE Services specified in Section 2.3.
1.2 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS: The As-Built Drawings shall consist of a set of drawings which clearly
indicate all field changes (modifications, additions and deletions) that were made to the Contract
Documents to adapt to field conditions and field changes. Such drawings shall include but not be
limited to all new and existing buried and concealed installation of piping, conduit and utility services
identified and/or field-surveyed in the course of design through construction. All buried and
concealed items both inside and outside the facility shall be accurately located on the As-Built
Drawings as to depth, size and material and in relationship to not less than two permanent features
such as interior or exterior wall faces. The As-Built Drawings shall be clean and all changes,
corrections, and dimensions shall be indicated in a neat and legible manner and fully comply with the
format guidelines prescribed in attached Exhibit 'C. One (1) hard-copy set of the As-Built Drawings
shall be submitted to the Owner with submittal of the Record Drawings. See Section 1.26 below for
"Record Drawings", which are a different set of drawings.
1.3 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: The Maricopa County Planning and Development
Department, the State Fire Marshal, the State Elevator Inspector and any Arizona municipal
corporation within which the Project is situated.
1.4 AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: A document issued by the Director or Director's designee to DP
authorizing the performance of specific professional services, and stating the time for completion
and the amount of fee authorized for such services.
1.5 BASIC SERVICES: Those NE Services defined in Section 2.2.
1.6 CHECK SET: A set of drawings that have been checked for errors and discrepancies between the
design disciplines.
1.7 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: The documents prepared by DP and their Subconsultants and
referred to in Section 2.2 of this Agreement to be used for permitting and construction of the Project.
1.8 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: An employee of Owner or agent of the Owner assigned
by the Director to monitor the construction and design services to be performed under this
Agreement and the construction of the Project as a direct representative of Owner. The Director
reserves the right, not to assign a Construction Project Manager to the project. In such case the
Owner's Project Manager will assume all Owner responsibilities for the project.
1.9 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: This Agreement, the DP proposal, the Construction Contract for this
Project (with its attachments), the Drawings and Project Specifications and Construction Documents
and exhibits and documents related thereto or contemplated thereby, as well as all Addenda,
Amendments and Change Orders related to each with respect to the Project and all changes to said
documents issued by Owner after execution of this Agreement.
1.10 CONTRACT TIME: The time between the date when the Notice to Proceed is issued to the
Construction Contractor and Final Completion of the Work.
1.11 CONTRACTOR: An individual, partnership, corporation, association, joint venture, or any
combination thereof, which has entered into a contract with Owner for construction of County of
Maricopa, Arizona, facilities and all incidents thereto.
1.12 COUNTY MANAGER: The chief executive officer of Owner.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 5
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
1.13 DAY: Shall mean a calendar day.
1.14 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: Design deferred to the Contractor by the DP for completion of the
design due to the complexity and associated Code impacts. Typical Deferred Submittals may
include Curtain Wall Systems, Stairs, Precast, Fire Alarm, and Fire Protection System. DP shall
provide a list of recommended Deferred Submittals to the Owner for approval prior to presenting
their proposal for design services under this contract.
1.15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS: The drawings, outline specifications and other
documents to delineate and describe the size and character of the entire Project as to civil,
structural, mechanical, plumbing, fire alarm and fire protection, electrical systems, landscaping,
construction and finish materials and other items incidental thereto, and as required by the Project
Manager.
1.16 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL ("DP"): The individual, partnership, LLC, professional association
corporation, association, joint venture, or any combination thereof, of properly registered
professional architects and/or engineers, that has entered into the Agreement to provide
professional services to Owner. DP is the prime Project professional as defined in the Rules
issued by the Arizona Board of Technical Registration.
1.17 DIRECTOR OF THE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT: The Director of the Facilities
Management Department of the County of Maricopa, Arizona having the authority and
responsibility for management of the specific project(s) to be carried out under this Agreement.
From time to time the Director may act through a Director's designee.
1.18 FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: A complete and accurate set of drawings and
specifications advancing the content of the Design Development documents so as to allow the
permitting and construction of the Project.
1.19 INSPECTOR: An employee or consultant assigned by the Project Manager or Construction Project
Manager to make observations of Work performed by a Contractor.
1.20 MAXIMUM COST LIMIT: The maximum amount budgeted by Maricopa County for the total cost of
the construction of the Work on the Project.
1.21 OWNER: The Owner is Maricopa County Facilities Management Department (FMD), the public
body which is a party hereto and the entity for which this contract is to be performed. In all
respects hereunder, Owner's performance is pursuant to Owner's position as Owner of the
Project. In the event Owner exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body, the exercise
of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any rules, regulations, codes, laws and
ordinances shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to Owner's authority as a governmental
body and shall not be attributable in any manner to Owner as a party to this contract.
1.22 PAYMENT APPLICATION: The certified form submitted by the Contractor requesting payment for
construction work to be reviewed by DP and approved by the Construction Project Manager.
1.23 PROJECT: The scope of construction, alteration or repair, and all services and incidents thereto,
of a County of Maricopa, Arizona facility as contemplated and budgeted by Owner.
1.24 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: A written document providing the proposed completion
date of each Phase of the Project through design, bidding, construction and proposed date of
occupancy by Owner.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 6
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
1.25 PROJECT MANAGER: An employee of Owner or agent of the Owner assigned by the Director to
monitor the services to be performed under this Agreement and the construction of the Project as
a direct representative of Owner.
1.26 RECORD DRAWINGS: Record Drawings are the official record drawings that document what was
constructed. The DP shall prepare Record Drawings from the As-Built documents for the Project.
The DP shall provide to Owner one (1) set of Record Drawings as a printed, hard-copy full-sized
set with one (1) corresponding set of digital media containing the complete Construction Drawings
for the Project in AutoCAD complying with the guidelines prescribed in attached Exhibit 'C'. The
resulting image produced on the viewing screen shall include all of the kinds of information that is
visible on full-sized originals approved for permit and issued for construction. These provisions
apply to all projects conducted at Maricopa County. All electronic media with As-Built or Record
Drawings MUST be in AutoCAD of BIM format (consistent with guidelines in attached Exhibit 'C')
with matching PDF.
1.27 SCHEMATIC DESIGN DOCUMENTS: The drawings and other documents illustrating the scale
and relationship of the Project components including the selection of materials, systems, and
equipment, as well as initial program drawings and documents that establish and describe the size
and character of the Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and
fire alarm and fire protection systems, materials and additional engineering services as deemed
necessary by the Owner and DP to produce a complete and accurate set of drawings and
specifications for the permitting and construction of the Project.
1.28 SCHEMATIC DESIGN STUDIES: Site and floor plans, elevations, sections and other items as
required by the Project Manager and shall show the scale and relationship of the parts and the
design concept of the whole.
1.29 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: A summary of the estimated cost of the
building(s) including wastewater, storm water, drainage, parking, lighting and landscaping with
fixed equipment, construction contingency allowance, escalation factors adjusted to the estimated
bid date, movable equipment (if any), contingencies (if any), utility service extensions (if
applicable), and a funding allocation evaluation comprised of a brief description of the basis for
estimated costs (similar projects) with square foot costs adjusted to bid date, and a preliminary
evaluation of the Project and the allocated construction funds in terms of each other.
1.30 SUBCONSULTANT: A person or organization of properly registered professional architects and/or
engineers, who has entered into an agreement with DP to furnish professional services for a
project or task, described under Basic Services or a task described under Additional Services or
Reimbursable Costs.
1.31 SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION: That date on which, as certified in writing by DP, the Work, or a
portion thereof designated by the Construction Project Manager is at a level of completion in
substantial compliance with the Contract Documents and has satisfied all requirements in the
Project Specifications and other Contract Documents such that all conditions of permits and
authorized authorities having jurisdiction have been satisfied and Owner or Owner's designee can
enjoy beneficial use and occupy and can use or operate in all respects for its intended purposes.
1.32 WORK: The entire construction or various separately identifiable parts thereof required to be
furnished under the Contract Documents. Work is the result of performing services, furnishing
labor and furnishing incorporating materials and equipment into the construction, all as required by
the Contract Documents.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 7
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
ARTICLE 2: DP SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1 SUSTAINABILITY:
2.1.1 The Project shall comply with designated Maricopa County goals for sustainability within
the project cost budget. The project shall incorporate "green" building practices to
achieve the highest efficiency standards reasonable to reduce operating costs via energy
savings; improve worker productivity; and reduce potential liability resulting from indoor
air quality problems.
2.2 BASIC SERVICES:
DP agrees to provide complete professional NE Services set forth in the five (5) phases of design
process enumerated below, including Code-compliant architectural, civil, structural, mechanical,
electrical engineering, plumbing, fire protection systems, landscape design and other engineering
services normally required for a project of this specific type, hereinafter collectively called "Basic
Services," as follows:
2.2.1 Phase I - Programming and Schematic Design:
2.2.1.1 DP shall confer with the Director or the Director's designee to establish the
Program or program verification, consisting of a detailed listing of all functions
and spaces together with the square footage of each assignable space, gross
square footage, and a description of the relationships between and among the
principal programmatic elements. Based upon Owner's input, DP shall establish
a design concept which shall incorporate environmental and visual elements.
Design of the Project is to include wastewater, storm water, drainage, parking,
lighting and any other design element necessary to complete the facility.
2.2.1.2 DP shall prepare and present, for approval by Owner, a Design Concept and
Schematics Report, comprising the Schematic Design Studies, including an
identification of any special requirement affecting the Project, a Project
Development Schedule and Statement of Probable Construction Cost, All
presentations shall be made to FMD and approved prior to any presentations to
the end user or stakeholders. This includes changes in scope and cost
estimates. Written approval from FMD is required prior to the release of any
information to the end user or stakeholders.
2.2.1.2.1 Schematic Design Documents shall consist of but not be limited to
site and floor plans, elevations, sections, etc., as required by the
Project Manager and the scale of the relationship of the parts and
design concept of the Project and shall also include a review of all
Building Codes and applicable laws to determine compliance,
scheduling and construction budget information.
2.2.1.2.2 Schematic Design Studies shall consist of but not be limited to site
and floor plans, elevations, sections, etc. as required by the Project
Manager and shall show the scale and relationship of the parts and
the design concept of the whole.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 8
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
2.2.1.2.3 The Project Development Schedule shall define the proposed
completion date of each Phase of the Project through design,
bidding, construction, and proposed date of occupancy by Owner.
2.2.1.2.4 Statements of Probable Construction Cost shall include a summary
of the estimated cost of the building(s) including fixed equipment,
escalation factors adjusted to the estimated bid date, movable
equipment (if any), contingencies (if any), alternates, utility
improvement, utility service extensions (if applicable), and any offsite
utilities included in the Scope of Work and applicable sales tax.
2.2.1.3 •DP shall submit hard copies and one (1) electronic media set (in PDF format,
but generated from AutoCAD files complying with guidelines per Exhibit 'C') on
disk of all documents required under this Phase I, without additional charge, for
approval by Owner. DP shall not proceed with the next Phase II until the
documents have been approved by Owner and a written Authorization to
Proceed with the next phase of the design has been issued by the Director or
Director's designee.
2.2.1.4 DP shall prepare an energy efficiency study necessary to comply with all
applicable mechanical and electrical codes, requirements and standards for
Owner and the State of Arizona.
2.2.2 Phase II - Design Development:
2.2.2.1 Working from the previously approved Schematic Design documents, DP, shall
prepare and present, for review and approval by Owner, the Design
Development Documents, comprising the drawings, outline specifications and
other documents to delineate and describe the size and character of the entire
Project as to architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, fire alarm, fire protection,
plumbing and electrical systems, landscaping, construction materials and finish
materials. DP shall be required to make at least one (1) presentation of the
Design Development Documents to Owner. As and if requested by the Project
Manager, Subconsultants engaged by DP shall attend this presentation to
explain the design concept of their respective systems. All presentations shall
be made to FMD and approved prior to any presentations to the end user or
stakeholders. This includes changes in scope and cost estimates. Written
approval from FMD is required prior to the release of any information to the end
user or stakeholders.
2.2.2.2 At this Phase II presentation, DP shall also submit an Updated Statement of
Probable Construction Cost. If the Updated Statement of Probable Construction
Cost exceeds the Construction Budget, appropriate cost or scope reduction
recommendations must be included by DP in the recommendation at no cost to
Owner.
2.2.2.3 DP shall submit hard copies and one (1) electronic media set (in PDF format,
but generated from AutoCAD files complying with guidelines prescribed in
Exhibit 'C') on disk of all documents required under this Phase, without
additional charge, for approval by Owner, and DP shall not proceed with the
next Phase of the design until Owner has approved the documents and a written
authorization for the next Phase has been issued.
2.2.2.4 If requested by the Project Manager, DP shall prepare Finish Material Sample
boards as necessary to review the color selections of all finish materials with the
Project Manager and DP will furnish the approved colors to Owner within a
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 9
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
timeframe acceptable to the Project Manager. This shall be done in a timely
manner so as to not delay Project progress.
2.2.3 Phase III - Construction Documents Development:
Working from the approved Design Development Documents and in accordance with
Owner's format, DP shall prepare for approval by Owner Construction Documents,
setting forth in detail all requirements necessary for the permitting, bidding and
construction of the Project. DP is responsible for full compliance of the design and the
Construction Documents with applicable codes of building officials or entities having
jurisdiction and shall opine to Owner that the Project can be constructed within the
Maximum Cost Limit set by Owner for the Construction Cost.
2.2.3.1 50% Construction Documents Submittal:
DP shall make a 50% Construction Documents submittal, for approval by Owner,
which submission shall include:
2.2.3.1.1 Hard copies and one (1) electronic media set of all drawings
(AutoCAD complying with guidelines prescribed in Exhibit 'C' with
matching PDF) and specifications (complying with designated
products / materials / systems prescribed by the Owner).
2.2.3.1.2 A complete index of every drawing sheet, to become part of the
Construction Documents, including DP's evaluation of the individual
percentage completion of each sheet at this stage.
2.2.3.1.3 DP shall, in the preparation of the Project Specifications, use the
most recent edition of CSI Standards promulgated by the
Construction Specifications Institute and these technical
specifications shall not be merely outline specifications as were
submitted during the Design Development phase. Specification
content shall be coordinated in conjunction with prescribed products /
materials / systems of the Owner, as identified during Design
Development.
2.2.3.1.4 An updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost, as determined
by DP as indicated by time factor, changes in requirements, or
general market conditions, and an updated Project Development
Schedule.
An Authorization to Proceed with the completion of Phase III will not
be issued by the Director or Director's designee if the latest
Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the Construction
Budget, unless Owner increases the Construction Budget or DP and
Owner mutually agree on methods of cost reduction sufficient to
enable construction of the Project within the funds available.
2.2.3.1.5 DP may also be authorized by Owner to include in the Construction
Documents approved additive alternate bid items to permit Owner to
award a Construction Contract within the limit of Construction
Budget.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 10
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
2.2.3.2 DP shall not proceed with further design until written approval from the Director
or Director's designee is received on the 50% Construction Documents set and
a Statement of Probable is provided that is within the Construction Budget.
2.2.3.3 100% Construction Documents Submittal:
2.2.3.3.1 Upon 100% completion of the Construction Documents, DP shall
submit to Owner hard copies, one (1) electronic media set (AutoCAD
complying with guidelines prescribed in Exhibit 'C' with matching
PDF) and one (1) electronic BIM model on disk of Check Sets of the
drawings, specifications, reports, programs, etc., together with a
final, updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost or, when
specifically authorized by the Director as a reimbursable expense, a
Detailed Estimate of Cost. The Construction Documents 100%
submittal shall consist of six (6) full-size sets of drawings, three (3)
11"x17" size set(s) of drawings and six (6) sets of Project
Specifications for Owner to review on disk. These sets with
resolution of comments from this review incorporated into the
documents shall establish completion of the 100% Construction
Documents. Once approved by Owner, the 100% Construction
Documents shall become the Approved 100% Construction
Documents and shall not be altered, modified or revised without
Owner's prior written consent.
2.2.3.3.2 DP shall make all required changes or additions and resolve all
questions on the documents. The 100% complete Set shall be
returned to Owner. Upon final approval by Owner, DP shall furnish
one copy of all Drawings and Project Specifications, along with an
electronic copy to Owner without additional charge to Owner.
2.2.3.3.3 DP shall be responsible for preparing and filing the documents
required for approval by governmental authorities having jurisdiction
over the Project and in obtaining certifications of "permit approval" by
such reviewing authorities.. DP shall make the original documents
available to Owner for reproduction of additional copies as may be
required for bid solicitation and/or construction purposes.
2.2.3.3.4 If directed by the Owner, the DP shall create and make available for
reproduction a set of "Construction" Documents incorporating all
revisions resulting from the permitting process.
2.2.3.3.5 DP expressly warrants that the Drawings and Project Specifications
and Construction Documents for the Project have been prepared by
DP and the Subconsultants of DP by exercising their professional
skills with care and diligence and in a reasonable non-negligent
manner consistent with the standard of care of like professionals in
Maricopa County, Arizona.
2.2.3.3.6 DP shall be responsible for the cost of any additional design
necessary to correct errors and omissions caused by or attributable
to DP that fall outside the applicable standard of care.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 11
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
2.2.4 Phase IV — Public Bidding and Award of Contract:
2.2.4.1 Bid Documents Approvals and Printing:
2.2.4.1.1 Upon receipt of all necessary permit approvals of the Construction
Documents, and approval by Owner of the most recent Statement of
Probable Construction Cost from DP, DP shall assist Owner in
soliciting bids and awarding a construction contract.
2.2.4.1.2 Owner may have the drawings and specifications printed for bid
solicitation purposes, either through its open and ongoing agreements
with printing firms or as a reimbursable service through DP.
2.2.4.2 Issuance of Solicitation Documents, Addenda and bid opening:
2.2.4.2.1 In addition to fulfilling statutory advertising requirements, Owner shall
issue a notice to prospective bidders informing them how to obtain
solicitation documents.
2.2.4.2.2 DP shall prepare addenda to the solicitation documents, if any are
required, for Owner to issue same to all prospective respondents. No
such addendum shall be issued without Owner's approval.
2.2.4.2.3 DP shall be present at the solicitation opening, with Owner's
representatives, to assist as needed.
2.2.4.3 Should the lowest responsive, responsible bid received exceed the Construction
Budget, Owner may:
2.2.4.3.1 approve the resulting increase in Construction Budget and award the
contract, or
2.2.4.3.2 reject all responses and re-solicit for the contract within a reasonable
time with no change in the Project, or
2.2.4.3.3 in accordance with A.R.S. § 34-104.E, direct DP at no added cost to
Owner to revise the Project scope or quality, or both, as approved by
Owner, and then re-solicit the contract, or
2.2.4.3.4 Abandon or suspend the Project per Article 12 below.
2.2.5 Phase V — Observation and Administration of the Construction Contract:
2.2.5.1 The Construction Phase of the Project will commence with the award of the
Construction Contract and will end when final payment is made by Owner.
During this period, DP shall observe and provide administration of the
Construction Contract only as set forth in the Construction Contract and other
Contract Documents and as provided herein.
2.2.5.2 During the Construction Phase, DP shall advise and consult with Owner and
shall have authority to act on behalf of Owner only as set forth herein and to the
extent provided in the Construction Contract, incorporated by this reference.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 12
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
2.2.5.3 DP shall visit the site at least weekly and at such times as requested by the
Construction Project Manager, and at all key construction events, DP's
Subconsultants shall visit the site weekly, to ascertain the progress of the
Project and to determine in general if the Work is proceeding in accordance with
the Contract Documents. On the basis of on-site observations, DP shall advise
the Owner in writing, regarding a recommendation of rejection of work that does
not confirm to the Contract Documents. DP will not be required to make
extensive inspections or provide continuous daily on-site inspections to check
the quality or quantity of the Work unless otherwise set forth in this Agreement.
DP is not responsible for the Contractor's construction means, methods,
techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in
connection with the performance of the Work, nor will DP be held responsible
for the Contractor's or Subcontractors', or any of their agents' or employees',
failure to perform the Work in compliance with the Contract Documents.
2.2.5.4 DP shall furnish Owner with a written report of all observations of the Work
made by DP during each visit made to the Project. DP shall keep a log of all
non-compliant work and shall keep track of all such issues to resolution. DP
shall also state in the log the final resolution action and the date correction was
made. DP shall also note the general status and progress of the Work and
submit same in a timely manner or more often if requested by the Construction
Project Manager. DP shall ascertain that the Contractor is making timely,
accurate, and complete notations on its As-Built Drawings as the Work
proceeds by reviewing the Contractor's As-Built Drawings on a monthly basis
and providing written confirmation to the Owner.
2.2.5.5 Based on observations at the site and consultation with the Construction Project
Manager, DP shall determine the amount due the Contractor in progress
payments and shall recommend approval or disapproval of amounts applied for
by executing AIA Form G702. This recommendation shall constitute a
representation by DP to Owner that, to the best of DP's knowledge, information
and belief, the Work has progressed to the point indicated in the pay application
and the quality and quantity of the Work is in compliance with the Contract
Documents subject to:
2.2.5.5.1 an evaluation of the Work for compliance with the Contract
Documents upon Substantial Completion,
2.2.5.5.2 the results of any subsequent tests required by the Contract
Documents,
2.2.5.5.3 minor deviations from the Contract Documents correctable prior to
Project completion, and
2.2.5.5.4 any specific qualifications stated in the Payment Application.
2.2.5.6 If Owner elects to withhold, in whole or in part, any progress payment to
Contractor, DP may be requested to assist Owner in preparation of specific
written findings about the deficiency in the Work and in calculating the
reasonable cost necessary to correct the deficient work and complete same.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 13
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
2.2.5.7 DP shall be the initial interpreter of the requirements of the Contract Documents
and the initial judge of the performance thereunder. DP shall render written
interpretations necessary for the proper execution or progress of the Work with
reasonable promptness on written request of either Owner or the Contractor. If
revisions to the Drawings and/or Project Specifications become necessary, DP
shall make a written proposal as to the cost unless the need for revision is
attributable to DP.
2.2.5.8 DP shall render written recommendations, within a reasonable time, on all
claims, disputes and other issues or matters in question between Owner and the
Contractor relating to the execution or progress of the Work or the interpretation
of the Contract Documents. The Director or Director's designee shall make final
decision regarding interpretations or disputes related to or arising therefrom.
2.2.5.9 Such interpretations and recommendations of DP shall be consistent with the
intent of and reasonably inferable from, the Contract Documents and shall be in
written form with graphics supplementation if helpful. In the capacity of
interpreter, DP shall endeavor to secure faithful performance of the Contract by
both Owner and the Contractor, and shall not show partiality to either.
2.2.5.10 DP shall have authority to recommend rejection of Work which does not
conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever, in DP's reasonable opinion, it
is necessary or advisable to insure compliance with the Contract Documents,
DP will recommend special inspection or testing of any Work deemed to be not
in compliance with the Contract Documents, whether or not such Work has
been fabricated and delivered to the Project, or installed and completed but
such inspection or testing may only be authorized by Owner. DP shall provide
such normal mechanical, plumbing, electrical, structural, landscape or other
related inspection expertise and services as is necessary from time to time to
determine compliance with the Construction Contract.
2.2.5.11 DP shall review and return all submittals, shop drawings, samples, deferred
submittals and other submissions of the Contractor for conformance with the
design concept of the Project and for compliance with the Contract Documents
within fourteen (14) days from receipt.
2.2.5.12 DP shall respond to all Requests for Information or Clarification from
Contractor or Owner within seven (7) days from receipt and shall do so with
graphic supplementation when requested. All reviews are to be conducted in a
timely manner so as to not delay progress of the construction. Changes to or
substitution of Contract Documents shall not be authorized without the written
concurrence of Owner.
2.2.5.13 DP shall issue a Proposal Request (PR) and a Potential Change Order (PCO)
for each revision to the contract but only after consulting with and with the
agreement of the Construction Project Manager. The DP shall review and
make recommendations to the Construction Project Manager on all Change
Order Requests submitted by the Contractor prior to responding to the
Contractor. DP shall review and negotiate all Change Order Requests
submitted by the Contractor and recommend acceptable changes to the
Construction Project Manager for final approval. Upon approval by the
Construction Project Manager the DP shall issue a Change Order for the
required approvals. DP shall review all Contractor requests for time extensions
and make recommendations to the Construction Manager before responding to
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page 1 14
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
the Contractor. .DP may issue supplemental instruction or interpretation of the
Contract Documents or order minor changes in the Work so long as they
involve no change in Contract Time or Contract Price.
2.2.5.14 Upon receipt of the Contractor's Request for Substantial Completion with
Contractor's Punch List attached, DP shall, prior to occupancy by Owner,
confirm and recommend to the Owner that the project is substantially complete
in accordance with the Contract requirements. Upon Owner written
concurrence, DP shall develop a complete, final punch list of any remaining
defects and discrepancies in the Work. The punch list shall be created with the
Owner's involvement and include Owner's comments. The complete punch list
shall be attached to the DP Certificate of Substantial Completion. DP shall be
responsible for all punch list back-checks and confirmation of full and
satisfactory performance before DP recommends to the Owner that a Final
Acceptance and final payment be made to the Contractor.
2.2.5.15 For Substantial Completion, DP shall obtain from the Contractor all guarantees,
Operation and Maintenance manuals for equipment, releases of claims and
such other documents and certificates as may be required by applicable codes,
laws, and the as built specifications, review them for compliance with Contract
requirements, and deliver them to Owner if in compliance.
2.2.5.16 DP shall provide assistance in obtaining the Contractor's compliance with the
Contract Documents relative to 1) initial instruction of Owner's personnel in the
operation and maintenance of any equipment or system, 2) initial start-up and
testing, adjusting and balancing of equipment and systems, 4) final clean-up of
the Project.
2.2.5.17 During all phases of the Project, DP shall notify Owner in writing of all conflicts
between the Plans and Specifications and/or Contract Documents and any
laws, codes, ordinances, rules, regulations and restrictions that come to the
attention of DP or should have reasonably come to DP's attention with the
exercise of due care.
2.2.5.18 DP shall prepare and submit to Owner weekly and/or monthly reports, as
required by the Construction Project Manager, throughout the Construction
Phase of the Project. The reports shall provide the current status of activities of
DP, Contractor, subcontractors, Consultants, Subconsultants, and others
whose activities affect the Project. The reports shall also include a copy of the
log on all non-compliant work and all resolution information.
2.2.5.19 For both Basic and Additional Services, DP shall prepare Record Drawings and
provide to Owner one (1) printed hard-copy full-size set of all Record Drawings
and one (1) corresponding set of digital on computer magnetic media
containing the complete drawings for the Project in AutoCAD and in PDF. The
image on screen shall include all title blocks, borders, details, and all notes that
are visible on the full-sized originals. Each sheet provided shall indicate it is a
Record Drawing. DP shall also prepare a simplified version of all approved
Egress Plans in the Drawings used in the permit approval process and provide
such to Owner upon request for purposes of installation of evacuation / exiting
diagrams in the completed Project. DP acknowledges that the quantity thereof
and extent of depicted information may be determined by the Authority Having
Jurisdiction over the Project.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 15
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
2.2.5.20 In connection with Final Acceptance and final payment, DP shall inspect the
Work and determine:
2.2.5.20.1 Whether the Contractor has satisfactorily completed or corrected all
items on the punch list, attached to the Certificate of Substantial
Completion;
2.2.5.20.2 Whether the work complies with i) the Contract Documents, and ii) all
applicable laws, building codes or authorities having jurisdiction;
2.2.5.20.3 Whether required inspections by building officials have been
completed; and
2.2.5.20.4 In consultation with Owner, whether the Work is finally complete.
If the Work is not finally complete, the process as set forth above shall be
repeated until such time as the Work is finally completed in compliance with the
Contract Documents. DP shall also incorporate As-Built Drawings as defined in
Article 1, above, into the Record Drawings prior to Final Acceptance.
2.2.5.21 DP shall assist Owner in conducting a post-construction inspection at least
thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the one-year post-construction
warranty period to identify deficiencies and warranty-related problems. DP shall
note, prepare and submit to Owner a written report on all faults, deficiencies or
warranty problems observed.
2.2.6 Statement of Probable Construction Cost vs. Construction Budget:
If at any time during Phases I through V of the Basic Services (or during any Additional
Services) the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost submitted by DP exceeds
Owner's Construction Budget, DP shall, at no additional cost to Owner, revise the Design
Documents to bring the Construction cost within the Construction Budget. Such revised
Design Documents must be completed by DP within the time period designated in writing
by the Project Manager. The Construction Budget for the Work is not to be changed
unless amended by Maricopa County.
2.3 ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
2.3.1 The Additional Services listed below are beyond the scope of the Basic Services as same
are defined in this Agreement, and if authorized in advance by an appropriate written
directive from the Director or Director's designee, will be compensated for by lump sum
agreed to by Owner under Section 6.1.1.1, below, or at the hourly rate as provided under
Section 6.1.2 hereof.
2.3.1.1 Special analyses of Owner's needs, and special detailed programming
requirements for the Project authorized by Director or Director's designee.
2.3.1.2 Financial feasibility, life cycle costing or other special studies.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page 1 16
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
2.3.1.3 If not provided for in Basic Services or in Owner's own program, planning
surveys, site evaluations, or comparative studies of prospective sites as
authorized by Director or Director's designee.
2.3.1.4 Design services relative to future facilities, systems and equipment which are
not intended to be constructed as part of the Project.
2.3.1.5 Providing services to investigate existing conditions of facilities or to make
measured drawings thereof, after DP has expended an amount of time deemed
to be the normal requirement for renovation and alteration projects.
2.3.1.6 Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost consisting of quantity surveys itemizing
all material, equipment and labor required for the Project.
2.3.1.7 Excluding all equipment, materials, supplies and related items included in the
Construction Contract, design services required for or in connection with the
selection of furniture or furnishings or fixtures.
2.3.1.8 Investigation and making detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities,
and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by Owner.
2.3.1.9 Any additional special professional services (other than the customary
architectural, civil, structural, geo-technical, mechanical, plumbing, fire alarm,
fire protection, security, electrical engineering and landscape design services)
as may be required for the Project, including but not limited to: acoustical, food
service, theatrical, electronic, telephone/data, artists and sculptors.
2.3.1.10 The services of one or more full-time Project Field Representatives during
construction as deemed appropriate and as approved and authorized in
advance by the Project Manager.
2.3.1.11 Extended assistance beyond that provided under Basic Services for the initial
start-up, testing, adjusting and balancing of any equipment or system;
commissioning; extended training of Owner's personnel in operation and
maintenance of equipment and systems, and consultation during such training;
and preparation of operating and maintenance manuals, other than those
provided by the Contractor, subcontractor, or equipment manufacturer.
2.3.1.12 NE Services concerning replacement of any Work damaged or built in non-
compliance with the Contract Documents, providing the cause for such non-
compliance is determined by Owner to be other than by fault of DP or beyond
control of DP.
2.3.1.13 Making major revisions changing the scope of the Project, to Drawings and
Project Specifications, when such revisions are inconsistent with written
approvals or instructions previously given by Owner and are due to causes
beyond the control of DP. (Major revisions are defined as those changing the
scope and arrangement of spaces and/or scheme and/or any significant portion
thereof.)
2.3.1.14 Preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any
public hearing, arbitration or legal proceeding, providing, however, that DP
cannot testify or give evidence against Owner in any matters during the course
of providing services under this Agreement
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 17
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
2.3.1.15 Providing services after Final Completion and final payment to the Contractor,
other than those called for under this Agreement.
2.3.1.16 Additional Observation and Administration, in the event the time period of
Observation of DP under Basic Services exceeds the Contract Time for the
Work by more than45%, and only if the delay in completion of the Work is in
the opinion of Owner beyond the control of DP and the Additional Observation
and Administration is approved by the Construction Project Manager.
2.3.1.17 Renderings, sketches, models or photographs to further convey the proposed
design concept to the Owner.
2.3.1.18 Any other services not otherwise included in this Agreement.
2.3.2 Failure to timely perform any part of requested Additional Services identified in this
Agreement shall be a breach of the Agreement and Owner may, in its sole discretion,
without liability, contract with others to perform those services and the cost for those
services by others incurred by Owner shall be borne by DP, if the DP had agreed to
perform those services within the time frame mutually agreed upon when authorized to
proceed with them.
2.3.3 DP shall not perform any services not covered by this Agreement and any such services
performed by DP without prior written authorization shall be at DP's own risk and cost.
DP hereby agrees that in the absence of written prior authorization, DP's work will be at
its own risk, cost, and expense and DP agrees that, without such prior written
authorization, DP will make no claim for compensation for unauthorized services.
2.4 REIMBURSABLE COSTS:
Reimbursable Costs are those items that are authorized by Owner in writing for payment in
addition to the Basic and Additional Services and consist of actual expenditures (as verified by
invoices) made by DP and its Subconsultants in the interest of the progress of Work and in
accordance with the County's Contractor Travel Policy (MM0030) for the following purposes:
2.4.1 Identifiable transportation expenses in connection with the Project to locations outside the
Maricopa County area or from locations outside the Maricopa County area will not be
reimbursed unless specifically pre-authorized in writing by the Director or Director's
Designee.
2.4.2 Meals and lodging expenses will not be reimbursed for temporarily relocating DP's
employees from one of DP's offices to another office if the employee is relocated for
more than ten (10) consecutive working days. Lodging will be reimbursed only for room
rates equivalent to Federal governmental lodging.
2.4.3 Identifiable communication expenses approved by the Director or Director's Designee,
long distance telephone, courier and express mail between DP's various permanent
offices, DP's field office at the Project site is not considered a permanent office.
2.4.4 Cost of printing, reproduction or photography will be paid for by the Owner through a third
party printing firm. The DP will be responsible for its own incidental printing related to the
project.
2.4.5 Identifiable testing costs approved by Director or Director's Designee.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page f 18
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
2.4.6 All Permit fees paid to regulatory agencies for approvals directly attributable to the
Project.
2.4.7 Reimbursable Subconsultant expenses are limited to the items described above and on
the same basis.
2.4.8 All Reimbursable Costs will be approved by Owner only pursuant to verified invoices,
receipts or other acceptable proof of expenditure provided by DP.
'ARTICLE 3: SUBCONSULTANTS
3.1 REGISTRATION OF SUBCONSULTANTS:
All contracts entered into by DP with Subconsultants engaged to provide professional services on
the Project must be with registrants with the Arizona Board of Technical Registration. All such
contracts with Subconsultants must incorporate all terms and provisions of this Agreement
(including those re: Alternative Dispute Resolution) as they relate to the duties and
responsibilities of DP on the Project.
3.2 SUBCONSULTANTS' RELATIONS:
3.2.1 All services provided by the Subconsultants shall be pursuant to appropriate written
agreements between DP and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that
preserve and protect the rights of Owner and DP under this Agreement.
3.2.2 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual or business relationship
between Owner and the Subconsultants. DP acknowledges that Subconsultants are to
perform those professional services under the direction, control and supervision of DP as
the prime Project professional.
3.2.3 DP proposes to utilize the following Subconsultants:
FIRM NAME CONSULTING SERVICE
Atherton Engineering Civil Engineering Earthwork
Willdan Engineering Code Analysis
SYSKA Elevator Design
Eco3d Scanning
Tricord Fire Protection
A.V. Schwan Consulting Structural
3.2.4 DP shall not change or replace any Subconsultant without first obtaining prior approval
from the Director or Director's designee in response to a written request stating the
reasons for any proposed substitution. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 19
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
or delayed by the Director or Director's designee and, if the request is denied, an
explanation will be provided.
ARTICLE 4: OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1 INFORMATION FURNISHED:
Owner, at its expense and insofar as performance under this Agreement may require, shall
furnish DP with the following information:
4.1.1 Surveys of building sites, giving boundary dimensions, locations of existing structures
and/or trees, the grades and lines of street, pavement, and adjoining properties; the
rights, restrictions, easements, boundaries, and topographic data of a building site, and
such information as it has relative to sewer, water, gas and electrical services.
Information contained in such provided documents will be provided by Owner with no
express guarantee for their accuracy or completeness of lack thereof. DP agrees to field-
verify the accuracy or completeness of any information provided by the Owner as
deemed necessary by the DP to provide Contract Documents meeting expectations set
forth under Articles 2 and 3 herein.
4.1.2 Soil borings or test pits information, mechanical, structural, or other tests when deemed
necessary by Owner.
4.1.3 If available, drawings representing as-built conditions at the time of original construction
will be furnished to DP; however, they are not warranted to represent conditions as of the
date of this Agreement. DP must perform field investigations as deemed necessary by
the DP and Subconsultants in order to obtain sufficient information to perform services
complying with Articles 2 and 3 herein. Investigative services in excess of "Normal
Requirements," under normal industry standards, must be authorized in advance.
ARTICLE 5: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND REVIEW PROCEDURE
5.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT:
5.1.1 The Director or Director's designee shall act in behalf of Owner in all matters pertaining to
this Agreement, and with the approval of the County Manager, the Director or Director's
designee shall issue all Authorizations to Proceed to DP. The Director or Director's
designee shall approve all invoices for payment to DP upon recommendation of the
Project Manager.
5.1.2 Maricopa County Facilities Management Department is the Owner. The Director shall
designate a Project Manager and Construction Project Manager to have general
responsibility for management of the project through all phases of this Agreement. The
Project Manager shall have authority to issue Authorizations to Proceed to DP and meet
with DP at periodic intervals throughout the preparation of the Contract Documents to
assess the progress of the design and professional services and the Work in accordance
with approved schedules. The Project Manager shall also examine documents submitted
by DP, including invoices, and shall promptly render decisions and/or recommendations
pertaining thereto, to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of DP's work.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 20
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
5.1.3 If Owner observes or otherwise becomes aware of any faulty or defective work in the
Project, or other nonconformance with the Contract Documents during the Construction
Phase, Owner shall give prompt notice thereof to DP.
5.2 REVIEW PROCEDURES:
The following procedures shall be followed for review of all submittals required by Article 2 of this
Agreement:
5.2.1 DP shall submit programming when called for herein, Schematic Studies and Schematic
Documents, Design Development Documents and Construction Documents for review by
Owner in accordance with the Project Schedule.
5.2.2 Owner will be required to provide all review comments to DP within fourteen (14) calendar
days from receipt of the submittal.
5.2.3 DP shall respond to and incorporate review comments transmitted by Owner. Any budgetary
overruns or discrepancies shall be resolved by design and engineering modifications to bring
the DP Estimate of Probable Construction Cost within the Owner's Construction Budget.
5.2.4 Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, DP shall respond in writing within seven (7) days of
receipt of the review comments. Owner will log, transmit and facilitate the exchange of review
comments. DP shall also maintain a similar log and make it available to Owner at all times.
5.2.5 Replies to Responses: Owner will reply within seven (7) days to any responses requiring
confirmation and will advise DP if any further reconciliation is required.
5.2.6 Resolution of Differences: Owner will schedule a meeting between DP and Owner, to take
place within seven (7) days after review comments are issued to DP, in order to resolve all
issues between teams. Owner will arrange additional meetings or conference calls as
necessary, in order to expedite resolution and avoid impact to the Project Schedule or the
Contract Documents.
5.2.7 Punch List and Back-Check Review: Upon notice from the Contractor that the project is
substantially complete, the DP shall develop a punch list with assistance from the Construction
Project Manager, incorporating all comments into one punch list for issuance with the
Certificate of Substantial Completion. The DP will be responsible for all back-checks to the
punch list. If any comments remain unsatisfied, additional back checks shall be required by
DP until all comments have been satisfied. Any costs associated with DP's preparation of the
back-checks shall be DP's responsibility.
5.2.8 Resolution of all review comments is requisite for completion of any phase of the Design
Services.
5.2.9 Any failure of Owner to make a decision within the time limits set forth herein shall not be
construed as acquiescence in all or any part of a subsequent DP claim for relief or remedy.
ARTICLE 6: BASIS OF COMPENSATION
6.1 FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE:
Owner agrees to pay DP, and DP agrees to accept as payment for all of the Basic Services rendered
pursuant to this Agreement, a Lump Sum Not-to-Exceed Fee mutually agreed upon of
$ 6,515,058.00 or as set forth on Exhibit 'B', DP's Proposal, based upon hourly rates and hours,
which shall be indicated in DP's proposal and in Exhibit A.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 21
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Depal tment
6.1.1 Payments to DP on account of the Lump Sum Fee shall be made on the percentage of
the Basic Services completed and approved according to the Phase of the ALE services.
6.1.2 The Lump Sum fee shall include all costs associated with performing the Basic Services
including but not limited to attendance at all meetings with Owner staff, Project Manager,
Contractor, and Subconsultants necessary to perform all of the Basic Services, as well as
travel, lodging, mileage, long distance communications, modeling reproductions, postage
and handling of Drawings, Specifications and other documents, data processing, internet
services, and photographic production or modeling techniques.
6.1.3 Owner shall have no obligation or liability to pay any fee, expenditure or cost beyond the
Lump Sum Compensation agreed to.
6.2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES/REIMBURSABLES FEE:
DP may be authorized to perform and for Additional Services described under Section 2.3 and
Reimbursable Costs described in 2.4. The proposal for such services will be a negotiated Lump Sum
Not-to-Exceed Fee (negotiated by reference to the hourly rates):
6.2.1 Hourly rates shall be as defined pursuant to Exhibit A.
6.2.2 The following principals may be employed on the Project:
David Boehm Premnath Sundharam
Larry Smith
Lloyd Ramsey
Tom Kramer
6.2.3 Personnel directly engaged on a Project by DP may include architects, engineers,
designers, job captains, draftsmen, specification writers, field accountants and
manufacturer representatives engaged in consultation, research and design, production
of drawings, specifications and related documents construction inspection and other
services pertinent to a project during all phases therein.
6.2.4 Any authorized reimbursable services fee shall not include charges for office rent or
overhead expenses of any kind, including local telephone and utility charges, office and
drafting supplies, depreciation of equipment, professional dues, internet services,
subscriptions, etc., reproduction of drawings and specifications, mailing, stenographic,
clerical, or other employees time or travel and subsistence not directly related to a
project. For all reimbursable services Owner will pay DP the direct cost of the service
without a multiplier. Authorized reproductions in excess of sets required at each phase of
the work will be a Reimbursable Service.
6.2.5 Owner upon recommendation of the Director or Director's Designee will reimburse DP for
authorized Reimbursable Services as verified by appropriate bills, invoices or statements,
pursuant to Article 7.
6.3 Absent an Amendment to the Agreement, the aggregate total of Reimbursable Costs under
Section 2.03(b) shall not exceed $ 15,000.00 , without the prior written approval of the
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 22
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
Director or Director's designee. In the event that sum is exceeded, Owner shall have no liability or
responsibility for paying any such excess which will be DP's own cost and expense.
ARTICLE 7: PAYMENTS TO DP
7.1 PAYMENT FOR BASIC SERVICES:
Payments for Basic Services will be made monthly in proportion to the professional services
performed during each Phase of DP services.
7.2 PAYMENT FOR ADDITIONAL/REIMBURSABLE SERVICES:
7.2.1 Payment for Additional Services may be requested monthly in proportion to the services
performed. When such services are authorized as an hourly rate, DP shall submit for
approval by the Director or Director's designee, a duly certified invoice, giving names,
classification, salary rate per hour, hours worked and total charge for all personnel
directly engaged on a project or task. To the sum thus obtained, any authorized
Reimbursable Services Cost may be added. DP shall attach to the invoice all supporting
data for payments made to approved Subconsultants engaged on the Project or task.
7.2.2 In addition to the invoice, DP shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress
report giving the percentage of completion of the Project development and the total
estimated fee to completion.
7.3 DEDUCTIONS:
No deductions shall be made from DP's compensation on account of liquidated damages
assessed against Contractors or other sums withheld from payments to Contractors.
ARTICLE 8: INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
8.1 INDEMNIFICATION:
8.1.1 DP's Duty to Indemnify and Defend. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the DP shall
defend, indemnity and hold harmless the Owner, its agents, representatives, officers,
directors, officials, and employees from and against all claims, damages losses, and
expenses, including but not limited to attorney fees, court costs, expert witness fees, and
the cost of appellate proceedings, relating to, arising out of, or alleged to have resulted
from the negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful acts, errors, omissions or mistakes
of the DP, its agents, representatives, employees, or Subcontractors relating to the
performance of this Contract. DP's duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the
Owner, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials, and employees shall arise
in connection with any claim, damage loss or expense that is attributable to bodily injury,
sickness, disease, death or injury to, impairment, or destruction of property, including loss
of use resulting therefrom, caused by the referenced acts, errors, omissions, or mistakes
in the performance of this Contract, including those made by any person for whose acts,
errors, omissions or mistakes, the DP may be legally liable.
8.1.2 The amount and type of insurance coverage requirements set forth below will in no way
be construed as limiting the scope of the indemnity
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 23
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
8.2 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS:
DP, at DP's own expense, shall purchase and maintain the herein stipulated minimum insurance
from a company or companies duly licensed by the State of Arizona and possessing a current
A.M. Best, Inc., rating of B++. In lieu of State of Arizona licensing, the stipulated insurance may
be purchased from a company or companies which are authorized to do business in the State of
Arizona, provided that said insurance companies meet the approval of Owner. The format of any
insurance policies and forms must be acceptable to Owner.
8.2.1 All insurance required herein shall be maintained in full force and effect until all work or
service required to be performed under the terms of the Agreement is satisfactorily
completed and formally accepted. Failure to do so may, at the sole discretion of Owner,
constitute a material breach of this Agreement.
8.2.2 DP's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects Owner, and any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by Owner shall not contribute to it.
8.2.3 Any failure to comply with the claim reporting provisions of the insurance policies or any
breach of an insurance policy warranty shall not affect Owner's right to coverage afforded
under the insurance policies.
8.2.4 The insurance policies may provide coverage that contains deductibles or self-insured
retentions. Such deductible and/or self-insured retentions shall not be applicable with
respect to the coverage provided to Owner. DP shall be solely responsible for the
deductible and/or self-insured retention and Owner, at its option may require DP to
secure payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions by a surety bond or an
irrevocable and unconditional letter of credit.
8.2.5 Owner reserves the right to request and to receive, within ten (10) working days, certified
copies of any or all of the herein required insurance policies and/or endorsements. Owner
shall not be obligated, however, to review such policies and/or endorsements or to advise
DP of any deficiencies in such policies and endorsements, and such receipt shall not
relieve DP from, or be deemed a waiver of Owner's right to insist on strict fulfillment of
DP's obligations under this Agreement.
8.2.6 The insurance policies required by this Agreement, except Workers' Compensation, and
Errors and Omissions, shall name Owner, its agents, representatives, officers, directors,
officials and employees as Additional Insureds.
8.2.7 The policies required hereunder, except Workers' Compensation, and Errors and
Omissions, shall contain a waiver of transfer of rights of recovery (subrogation) against
Owner, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials and employees for any
claims arising out of DP's work or service.
8.3 REQUIRED COVERAGE:
DP is required to procure and maintain the following coverage's:
8.3.1 Commercial General Liability. Commercial General Liability insurance and, when
necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 for
each occurrence, $2,000,000 Personal/Advertising Injury, $4,000,000
Products/Completed Operations Aggregate, and $4,000,000 General Aggregate Limit.
The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form property damage, and
blanket contractual coverage, and shall not contain any provision that would serve to limit
third party action over claims. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the CGL
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 24
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Facilities Management Department
limiting the scope of coverage for liability arising from explosion, collapse, or underground
property damage.
8.3.2 Automobile Liability. Commercial/Business Automobile Liability insurance and, if
necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance with a combined single limit for bodily injury
and property damage of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence with respect to any of
DP's owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles assigned to or used in performance of DP's
work or services under this Agreement.
8.3.3 Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed
by federal and state statutes having jurisdiction of DP's employees engaged in the
performance of the work or services under this Contract; and Employer's Liability
insurance of not less than $1,000,000 for each accident, $1,000,000 disease for each
employee, and $1,000,000 disease policy limit.
8.3.4 Errors and Omissions (Professional Liability) Insurance. Errors and Omissions
(Professional Liability) insurance and, if necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance,
which will insure and provide coverage for errors or omissions or professional liability of
DP, with limits of no less than $2,000,000 per occurance, and $4,000,000 per aggregate.
8.4 COVERAGES:
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence
$2,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury
$4,000,000 General Aggregate
$4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations
Automotive Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence
Workers' Compensation $1,000,000 Each Accident
$1,000,000 Disease for Each Employee
$1,000,000 Disease Policy Limit
Errors and Omissions $2,000,000 Per Occurance
$4,000,000 Per Aggregate
8.5 CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE:
Prior to commencing work or services under this Agreement, DP shall furnish Owner with
Certificates of Insurance in a form acceptable to Owner, or formal endorsements as required by
the Contract in the form provided by Owner, issued by DP's insurer(s), as evidence that policies
providing the required coverage's, conditions and limits required by this Agreement are in full
force and effect. Such certificates shall identify this contract number and title.
8.5.1 In the event any insurance policy(ies) required by this contract is(are) written on a "claims
made" basis, coverage shall extend for two years past completion and acceptance of
DP's work or services and as evidenced by annual Certificates of Insurance.
8.5.2 If a policy does expire during the life of the Agreement, a renewal certificate must be sent
to Owner fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration date.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Pagej 25
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
8.6 CANCELLATION AND EXPIRATION NOTICE:
Insurance required herein shall not expire, be cancelled, or materially changed without thirty (30)
days prior written notice to Owner.
ARTICLE 9: PERFORMANCE
9.1 PERFORMANCE AND DELEGATION:
9.1.1 DP Services to be performed hereunder shall be performed by DP's own staff, unless
otherwise approved in writing by Owner. Said approval shall not be construed as
constituting an agreement between Owner and said other person or firm. DP's services
shall be performed in all respects in a manner consistent with that degree of skill and
care ordinarily exercised by practicing design professionals performing such services in
Maricopa County under the same or similar circumstances and conditions and in a
reasonable and non-negligent way.
9.1.2 DP agrees, within fourteen (14) days of receipt of a written request from Owner, to
promptly remove and replace any personnel employed or retained by DP, or any
subconsultants or subcontractors or any personnel of any such subconsultants or
subcontractors engaged by DP, to provide and perform services or work pursuant to the
requirements of this Agreement, whom Owner shall request in writing to be removed,
which request may be made by Owner with or without cause.
9.2 TIME FOR PERFORMANCE:
9.2.1 DP agrees to start all work hereunder upon receipt of an Authorization to Proceed issued
by the Director or Director's designee and to complete each Phase within the time
stipulated in the Authorization to Proceed. Time is of the essence with respect to
performance of this Agreement.
9.2.2 The Project schedule establishes the critical time limit of DP's services. DP shall not,
except for cause beyond the reasonable control of DP, exceed time limits established by
this Agreement. Any adjustments in the schedule must be approved in writing by Owner
and must be requested in writing by DP within ten (10) days after the occurrence upon
which DP's request for adjustment is based.
9.3 NO WAIVER OF PERFORMANCE:
The failure of the Owner to insist, in any one or more instances, on the performance of any of the
terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement or to exercise any of its rights hereunder, shall
not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of such term, covenant, condition or right with
respect to further performance.
9.4 Any failure of Owner to make a decision within the time limits set forth herein shall not be
construed as acquiesence in all or any part of a subsequent DP claim for relief or remedy.
ARTICLE 10: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
10.1 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS:
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page J 26
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
10.1.1 By execution of this Agreement, DP assigns all copyright ownership and other intellectual
property interest in the Design Documents and Construction Documents prepared by DP
and further agrees to execute and to cause any Subconsultant to execute any separate
assignment agreement necessary to implement such assignment.
10.1.2 The Drawings and Project Specifications as instruments of service are and shall become
the property of Owner whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not.
DP shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of the Drawings and
Project Specifications for information and reference in connection with Owner's use and
occupancy of the Project.
10.1.3 Submission or distribution of Contract Documents to meet official regulatory requirements
or for other purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication
in derogation of any of DP's rights.
10.1.4 To the extent allowed by law, DP agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any
third person, firm or organization, without Owner's prior written consent, or unless
incident to the proper performance of DP's obligations hereunder, or in the course of
judicial or legislative proceedings where such information has been properly subpoenaed,
any non-public information concerning the services to be rendered by DP hereunder, and
DP shall require all of its employees, agents, and Subconsultants to comply with the
provisions of this paragraph.
10.1.5 In the event of future reuse of the Construction Documents by Owner, DP's name and
seal shall be removed and DP shall not be liable to Owner or third parties in their reuse.
10.1.6 DP shall not use, or allow to be used, the Contract Documents, Drawings, Project
Specifications and reports of the unique aspects of this Project in any other project
without the prior written approval of Owner. DP's use of standard specifications texts and
details are specifically excluded from the provisions of this paragraph.
ARTICLE 11: ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
11.1 Scope. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided elsewhere in the Contract, the
alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") process provided for herein shall be the exclusive means
for resolution of claims or disputes arising under, relating to or touching upon the Contract, the
interpretation thereof or the performance or breach by any party thereto, including but not limited
to original claims or disputes asserted as cross claims, counterclaims, third party claims or claims
for indemnity or subrogation, in any threatened or ongoing litigation or arbitration with third
parties, if such disputes involve parties to contracts containing this ADR provision.
11.2 Neutral Evaluator, Arbitrators. The County will select a Neutral Evaluator to serve as set forth
in this ADR process. As needed under § 11.6.2 below, the County and DP shall each select an
arbitrator to serve as set forth in this ADR process. Each arbitrator selected shall be a member of
the State Bar of the State of Arizona and shall have experience in the field of construction law.
All arbitrators, once selected, shall serve as neutral arbitrators, even if they are party-appointed.
The County and the DP shall name their respective arbitrators within five (5) calendar days after
the declaration of a failure of mediation or the mutual waiver of mediation.
11.3 Discussion and Partnering. When a claim is made or a dispute arises relating to the Contract,
senior representatives of the County and the claimant will meet personally within ten (10) days to
discuss the claim/dispute and attempt to resolve it. If, after good faith efforts, resolution is not
achieved, the claim/dispute (hereafter "dispute") will proceed to the neutral evaluation process.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page J 27
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
11.4 Neutral Evaluation Process. If the parties have been unable to resolve the dispute after
discussions and partnering, the following neutral evaluation process shall be used to resolve any
such dispute.
11.4.1 Notification of Dispute. The County through its Agent shall promptly notify the Neutral
Evaluator in writing of the existence of a dispute within ten days of the County or the DP's
declaring need to commence the neutral evaluation process.
11.4.2 Non-Binding Informal Hearing. The Neutral Evaluator shall schedule a non-binding
informal hearing of the matter to be held within ten (10) calendar days from receipt of
notification of the existence of a dispute. The Neutral Evaluator may conduct the hearing
in such manner as he deems appropriate and shall notify each party of the hearing of its
opportunity to present such evidence as they believe will resolve the dispute. The Neutral
Evaluator shall notify each party to the dispute that they shall submit a written outline of
the issues and evidence intended to be introduced at the hearing and their proposed
resolution of the dispute to the Neutral Evaluator before the hearing commences.
Potential Arbitrators shall not participate in such informal hearing or proceedings process.
The Neutral Evaluator is not bound by the rules of evidence when admitting evidence in
the hearing and may limit the length of the hearing, the number of witnesses or any
evidence introduced to the extent deemed relevant and efficient.
11.4.3 Non-Binding Decision. The Neutral Evaluator shall render a non-binding written
decision as soon as possible, but not later than five (5) calendar days after the hearing
concludes.
11.4.4 Further proceedings. In the event that either party declines to accept the Neutral
Evaluator's decision as the resolution of the dispute, the dispute will proceed to
mediation.
11.5 Mediation. In the event that a meeting of principals and neutral evaluation have failed, the
parties shall engage in mediation (as a condition precedent to arbitration) within fifteen (15) days
of a party's notifying the Neutral Evaluator that the party declines to accept the Neutral
Evaluator's decision as the resolution of the dispute. The mediator shall be chosen by the
parties' agreement. If such agreement is not reached by five (5) days after the neutral evaluator's
receipt of a party's notification, then the mediator shall be named by the Neutral Evaluator. In the
event that mediation fails (or is waived by both parties) then the matter shall proceed to binding
arbitration.
11.6 Binding Arbitration Procedure. The following binding arbitration procedure shall serve as the
exclusive method to resolve a dispute if any party chooses not to accept the decision of the
Neutral Evaluator and mediation has failed or has been waived. A party requesting binding
arbitration shall notify the Neutral Evaluator in writing within seven (7) calendar days of the failure
or waiver of mediation of the party's demand for arbitration. If the Contractor requests arbitration
it shall post a cash bond with the Neutral Evaluator in an amount agreed upon by the parties or, in
the event of no agreement, the Neutral Evaluator shall establish the amount of the cash bond to
defray the cost of the arbitration as set forth in paragraph 11.6.11 and the proceeds from the
bond shall be allocated in accordance with paragraph 11.6.13 by the Arbitration Panel. The bond
must be in the full amount agreed upon or as established by the Neutral Evaluator to pay the
potential cost of the full arbitration proceeding. The bond must be posted with and received by the
Neutral Evaluator within five (5) calendar days after the demand for arbitration.
11.6.1 Arbitration Panel and Applicable Law and Rules. Disputes involving less than
$200,000 shall be heard by one single arbitrator chosen by agreement of the parties. For
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 28
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
disputes in excess of $200,000, the Arbitration Panel shall consist of three arbitrators: the
County's appointed arbitrator, the DP's appointed arbitrator and a third arbitrator (or
"neutral arbitrator") who shall be selected by the parties' arbitrators as set forth in Section
11.6.2. The arbitration is to be convened and administered under the Revised Uniform
Arbitration Act ("RUAA") (A.R.S. § 12-3001 et seq.) and the American Arbitration
Association Construction Rules shall serve as a guideline for proceedings, thus as a
supplement to the RUM.
11.6.2 Selection of Neutral Arbitrator. For disputes in excess of $200,000, the parties'
arbitrators shall choose the Neutral Arbitrator, within ten (10) calendar days of notification
of a demand for arbitration having been receiVedL by the Neutral Evaluator. The Neutral
Arbitrator shall have the same qualifications as those of the arbitrators set forth in
paragraph 11.2 above. In the event that the two party selected arbitrators cannot agree
on a Neutral Arbitrator as set forth above, the Neutral Arbitrator shall be selected as the
Default Neutral Arbitrator. If the County and DP cannot agree on the single arbitrator or
upon a Default Neutral Arbitrator, then County and the Contractor shall each submit two
names to Judge Barry Schneider (Retired), or his successor as designated by Maricopa
County, who shall select one person. The Neutral Arbitrator may submit his invoices for
services to the OWNER, and the OWNER shall pay the amounts invoiced (subject to the
provisions of paragraph 11.6) unless and until the DP is determined by the Arbitration
Panel to be the non-prevailing party and the Arbitration Panel determines per 11.6.11
what party pays such costs.
11.6.3 Expedited Hearing. The parties have structured this procedure with the goal of
providing for the prompt, efficient and final resolution of all disputes falling within the
purview of this ADR process. To that end, any party can petition the Neutral Evaluator to
set an expedited hearing. If the Neutral Evaluator determines that the circumstances
justify it, the Neutral Evaluator shall contact the selected single arbitrator or Arbitration
Panel and arrange for scheduling of the arbitration at the earliest possible date. In any
event, the hearing of any dispute not expedited will commence as soon as practical but in
no event later than twenty (20) calendar days after notification of request for arbitration
having been received. This deadline can be extended only with the consent of all the
parties to the dispute, or by decision of the single arbitrator or the Arbitration Panel upon
a showing of emergency circumstances.
11.6.4 Procedure. The single arbitrator or the Arbitration Panel will conduct the hearing in such
a manner that will resolve disputes in a prompt, cost efficient manner giving regard to the
rights of all parties. Each party shall supply to the single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel a
written pre-hearing statement which shall contain a brief statement of the nature of the
claim or defense, a list of witnesses and exhibits, a brief description of the subject matter
of the testimony of each witness who will be called to testify, and an estimate as to the
length of time that will be required for the arbitration hearing. The single arbitrator or the
Arbitration Panel shall review and consider the Neutral Evaluator decision. The single
arbitrator or the Chairman shall determine the nature and scope of discovery, if any, and
the manner of presentation of relevant evidence consistent with deadlines provided
herein, and the parties' objective that disputes be resolved in a prompt and efficient
manner. No discovery may be had of any materials or information for which a privilege is
recognized by Arizona law. The single arbitrator or the Chairman upon proper application
shall issue such orders as may be necessary and permissible under law to protect
confidential, proprietary or sensitive materials or information from public disclosure or
other misuse. Any party may make application to the Maricopa County Superior Court to
have a protective order entered as may be appropriate to confirm or enforce such orders
of the Chairman.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Pagel 29
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
11.6.5 Hearing Days. In order to effectuate parties' goals, the hearing once commenced, will
proceed from working day to working day until concluded, absent a showing of
emergency circumstances.
11.6.6 Award. The single arbitrator shall within ten (10) calendar days of the conclusion of a
hearing issue a reasoned award. The Arbitration Panel shall, within ten (10) calendar
days from the conclusion of any hearing, by majority vote issue its reasoned award. The
award shall include an allocation of fees and costs pursuant to 11.06.11 herein. The
award is to be in accordance with the Contract and the law of the State of Arizona.
11.6.7 Scope of Award. Regardless of the provisions of the RUAA, the Arbitration Panel shall
be without authority to award punitive damages, and any such punitive damage award
shall be void. If an award is made against any party in excess of one hundred thousand
dollars ($100,000), exclusive of interest, arbitration fees, costs and attorneys' fees, it shall
be supported by written findings of fact, conclusions of law and a statement as to how
damages were calculated.
11.6.8 Jurisdiction. The Arbitration Panel shall not be bound for jurisdictional purposes by the
amount asserted in any party's claim, but shall conduct a preliminary hearing into the
question of jurisdiction over the claim as regards its amount upon application of any party
at the earliest convenient time, but not later than the commencement of the arbitration
hearing. If the dispute is in reality one involving less than $200,000, the arbitration shall
continue before the Neutral Arbitrator as a single arbitrator, with the party appointed
arbitrators being excused.
11.6.9 Entry of Judgment. As provided in the RUAA, any party can make application to the
Maricopa County Superior Court for confirmation of an award, and for entry of judgment
on it.
11.6.10 Severance and Joinder. To reduce the possibility of inconsistent adjudications, the
Neutral Evaluator or the single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel, may: (i) at the request of
any party, join and/or sever parties, and/or claims arising under other contracts
containing this ADR provision, and (ii) the Neutral Evaluator, on his own authority, or the
single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel may, on its own authority, join or sever parties and/or
claims subject to this ADR process as deemed necessary for a just resolution of the
dispute, consistent with the parties' goal of the prompt and efficient resolution of disputes,
provided, however, that the NE, OWNER and Project Professionals shall not be joined
as a party to any claim made by a DP. Nothing herein shall create the right by any party
to assert claims against another party not germane to the Contract or not recognized
under the substantive law as applicable to the dispute. Neither the Neutral Evaluator nor
the single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel is authorized to join to the proceeding parties not
in privity with the County. DP cannot be joined to any pending arbitration proceeding,
without the Contractor's express written consent and unless DP is given the opportunity
to participate in the selection of the single arbitrator or non-County appointed arbitrator.
11.6.11 Fees and Costs. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs in connection with any
informal hearing before the Neutral Evaluator and the mediation. All fees and costs
associated with any arbitration before the single panel or Arbitration Panel, including
without limitation the Arbitrator fees, and the prevailing party's reasonable attorneys' fees,
expert witness fees and costs, will be paid by the non-prevailing party, except as
provided for herein. In the event that DP is the non-prevailing party, all fees and costs as
noted above shall first be paid out of the bond posted with the Neutral Evaluator. In no
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 30
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
event shall the DP's obligation to pay fees and costs be limited to the amount of the bond
posted herein. In no event shall any Arbitrator's hourly fees be awarded in an amount in
excess of $250 per hour and (i) costs shall not include any travel expenses in excess of
mileage at the rate paid by Maricopa County, not to exceed a one way trip of 150 miles,
and (ii) all travel expenses, including meals, shall be reimbursed pursuant to the travel
policy of Maricopa County in effect at the time of the hearing. The determination of
prevailing and non-prevailing parties, and the appropriate allocation of fees and costs, will
be included in the award by the single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel. Fees for the Neutral
Evaluator shall be paid by County.
11.6.12 Confidentiality. Any proceeding initiated under this ADR provision shall be deemed
confidential to the maximum extent allowed by Arizona law and, except for disclosures to
a party's attorneys or accountants, no party shall make any disclosure related to the
disputed matter or to the outcome of any proceeding except to the extent required by law,
or to seek interim equitable relief, or to enforce an agreement reached by the parties or
an award made hereunder. This provision does not affect the County's right to inform the
County Supervisors of the resolution of the dispute.
11.6.13 Equitable Litigation. Notwithstanding any other provision of ADR to the contrary, any
party can petition the Maricopa County Superior Court for interim equitable relief as may
become necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent immediate and irreparable
harm to a party or to the Project pending resolution of a dispute pursuant to ADR
provided herein. No court may order any permanent injunctive relief except as may be
necessary to enforce an order entered by the Arbitration Panel. The fees and costs
incurred in connection with any such equitable proceeding shall be determined and
assessed in ADR.
11.6.14 Change Order. Any award in favor of the DP against the County or in favor of the
County against the DP shall be reduced to a Change Order and executed by the parties
in accordance with the award and the provisions of the Contract.
11.6.15 Merger and Bar. Any claim asserted pursuant to this ADR process shall be deemed to
include all claims, demands, and requests for compensation for costs and losses or other
relief, including the extension of the Contract performance period which reasonably
should or could have been brought against any party that was or could have been
brought into this ADR process, with respect to the subject claim. The Arbitration Panel
shall apply legal principles commonly known as merger and bar to deny any claim or
claims against any party regarding which claim or claims recovery has been sought or
should have been sought in a previously adjudicated claim for an alleged cost, loss,
breach, error, or omission.
11.7 Inclusion in Other Contracts. The DP shall cooperate with the County in efforts to include this
ADR provision in all other Project contracts. Subject to DP's reasonable agreement, the
Contractor agrees that any modification to this ADR provision that is included in the construction
or other contracts shall also apply to the DP. It is the intent of the parties that any changes to this
ADR provision in later contracts will be evolutionary and designed to incorporate the terms of this
ADR provision without material changes to the substance or procedure of this ADR provision.
ARTICLE 12: SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 31
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
12.1 PROJECT SUSPENSION:
Owner may suspend the Project and DP's services without cause but if the Project is suspended
for more than one-hundred eighty (180) days, DP shall be paid for all Basic Services and
Reimbursables that have been authorized by an Authorization to Proceed and that were
performed by DP and accepted by Owner prior to the date of such suspension. If the Project is
resumed after having been suspended for 180 days, DP's further compensation shall be subject
to renegotiation.
12.2 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT:
12.2.1 Owner has the right to terminate this Agreement for its convenience upon seven (7) days
written notice to DP. Upon such termination, all charts, sketches, studies, drawings,
models and other documents related to services performed under this Agreement,
whether finished or not, shall be turned over to Owner within ten (10) days of notice of
termination provided that DP has been paid in full for services rendered and approved by
Owner as of the date of termination and reasonable termination costs supported by
documentation.
12.2.2 Owner has the right to terminate this Agreement for default upon seven (7) days written
notice stating the grounds for default or material breach. If DP has not cured the default
or breach to the satisfaction of Owner, Owner shall receive ownership of all design
documents upon request of Owner and Owner has the right to use, renovate and to make
derivative works of the design documents in order to complete the Project.
12.2.3 Termination, for whatever cause or on whatever basis, shall not result in DP's being
entitled to claim any lost profits as a result of the termination.
ARTICLE 13: MISCELLANEOUS
13.1 MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS:
DP will maintain and require Subconsultant to retain adequate records and supporting
documentation which concern or reflect its services hereunder. The records and documentation
will be retained by DP for a minimum of six (6) years from the date of termination of this
Agreement or the date the Project is completed, whichever is later. Owner, or any duly authorized
agents or representatives of Owner, shall have the right to audit, inspect, and copy all such
records and documentation as often as they deem necessary during the period of this Agreement
and during the six (6) year period noted above. Refusal of DP to comply with the provisions of this
section shall be grounds for termination for cause of this Agreement by Owner.
13.2 CANCELLATION:
Owner may cancel this Agreement without penalty or further obligation under A.R.S. § 38-511 if
any person significantly involved with this Agreement on behalf of Owner is or becomes a
consultant to DP or a Subconsultant with respect to the subject matter of the Agreement or an
employee of DP does so.
13.3 PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS:
All payment obligations of Owner are conditioned on the availability of funds which are approved
and allocated for such obligation. If funds are not allocated and available for continuation of DP's
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 32
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
services, this Agreement may be terminated or suspended at the end of the time period for which
funds are available. No liability or penalty shall accrue or be attributable to Owner in the event it
becomes necessary to exercise rights under this provision.
13.4 NON-DEFINED TERMS:
If not specifically defined herein, terms, words and phrases will have their ordinary and common
meaning and they, together with abbreviations, shall be interpreted consistent with the design
professional industry standards and technical and trade meanings.
13.5 NON-WAIVER PROVISIONS:
The failure of the Owner to insist, in any one or more instances, on the performance of any of the
terms, covenants or conditions of the Agreement, or to exercise any of its rights hereunder, shall
not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of such terms, covenant, conditions or right with
respect to further performance.
13.6 NO HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OR PRODUCTS:
DP shall use reasonable care not to specify for use in the Project any product known by DP to
contain hazardous substances as defined in 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq. unless no reasonable
alternative is available and in that case Owner consent to sue shall first be obtained.
13.7 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION:
DP shall immediately notify Owner both verbally and in writing of the presence of and location of
any environmental contamination of the site which it becomes aware of or reasonably should
become aware, including, but not limited to, hazardous substances and petroleum releases.
13.8 ADA REQUIREMENTS:
The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") is applicable to the Project. DP will use its skill and
training as a design professional and exercise the applicable standard of care to design the
Project in compliance with ADA requirements.
13.9 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS:
The performance of this Agreement shall not be transferred, pledged, sold, delegated or
assigned, in whole or in part, by DP without the written consent of Owner.
DP and Owner each binds one another, their partners, successors, legal representatives and
authorized assigns to the other party of this Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal
representatives and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement.
13.10 TRUTH-IN-NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE:
In compliance with DP's Competitive Negotiation Act, for any Authorization to Proceed for a
project to be compensated under the Lump Sum method DP shall certify that wage rates and
other factual unit costs supporting the compensation are accurate, complete, and current at the
time of said Authorization to Proceed. The original Project price and any addition thereto will be
adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which Owner determines the project price was
increased due to inaccurate, incomplete or noncurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs. All
such price adjustments will be made within one (1) year following the end of the Project.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph 2) Page I 33
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
13.11 NOTICES:
Whenever either party desires to give notice unto the other, such notice must be in writing, sent
by registered United States mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the party for whom it is
intended at the place last specified; and the place for giving of notice shall remain such until it
shall have been changed by written notice in compliance with the provisions of this paragraph.
For the present, the parties designate the following as the respective places for giving of notice:
> FOR OWNER:
Director, Maricopa County Facilities Management Department
401 W. Jefferson Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
> FOR DP:
David Boehm, AIA
DLR Group
6225 N. 24th Street, Suite 250
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
13.12 SEVERABILITY:
If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement (or the application thereof to any
circumstance or person) shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remaining terms,
covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby; and each
remaining term, covenant, condition and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be
enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law unless the enforcement of the remaining terms,
covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement would prevent the accomplishment of the
original intent of the agreement between the parties.
13.13 SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS:
All terms, conditions, covenants and obligations of Owner and DP hereunder shall survive the
termination or expiration of this Agreement as necessary and appropriate for such parties to fulfill
their obligations that accrued during the Term of this Agreement.
13.14 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT:
This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between Owner and DP and
supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement
may not be amended, changed, modified, or otherwise altered in any respect, at any time after
the execution hereof, except by a written document executed with the same formality and equal
dignity herewith. Waiver by either party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not
be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach of any provision of this Agreement.
13.15 NO CONTINGENT FEE:
DP (or registered surveyor and mapper or professional engineer, as applicable) warrants that he
or she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee
working solely for DP (or registered surveyor and mapper, or professional engineer, as
applicable) to solicit or secure this Agreement and that he or she has not paid or agreed to pay
any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for DP (or registered surveyor and mapper or professional engineer, as applicable) any fee,
commission, percentage, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 34
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this provision, Owner shall have the
right to terminate the Agreement without liability and, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract
price, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift or
consideration.
13A6 APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE OF LITIGATION:
This Agreement shall be enforced, interpreted, and construed in accordance with and governed
by the laws of the State of Arizona including the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (A.R.S. §. 12-
3001 et seq.), which is applicable hereto. Any suit or action brought by any party concerning this
Agreement, or arising out of this Agreement, shall be brought in Maricopa County, Arizona.
13.17 INTERPRETATION:
The language of this Agreement has been agreed to by both parties to express their mutual intent
and no rule of strict construction shall be applied against either party hereto. The headings
contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. All personal pronouns used in this Agreement shall
include the other gender, and the singular shall include the plural, and vice versa, unless the
context otherwise requires. Terms such as "herein," "hereof," "hereunder," and "hereinafter" refer
to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular sentence, paragraph, or section where
they appear, unless the context otherwise requires. Whenever reference is made to a Section or
Article of this Agreement, such reference is to the Section or Article as a whole, including all of
the subsections of such Section, unless the reference is made to a particular subsection or
subparagraph of such Section or Article.
13.18 PRIORITY OF PROVISIONS:
If there is a conflict or inconsistency between any term, statement, requirement, or provision of
any exhibit attached hereto, any document or events referred to herein, or any document
incorporated into this Agreement by reference and a term, statement, requirement, or provision of
this Agreement, the term, statement, requirement, or provision contained in this Agreement shall
prevail and be given effect.
13.19 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS:
DP shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, rules, regulations and resolutions in
performing its duties, responsibilities and obligations related to this Agreement.
13.20 PRIOR AGREEMENTS:
This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations,
agreements and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree
that there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of
this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no
deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or
agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or
alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless set forth in writing.
13.21 LEGAL WORKER REQUIREMENTS:
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 35
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
As required by A.R.S. § 41-4401, OWNER is prohibited after September 30, 2008 from awarding
a contract to any service or construction contractor who fails, or whose subcontractors fail, to
comply with A.R.S. § 23-214-A. DP warrants that it complies fully with all federal immigration laws
and regulations that relate to its employees, that it shall verify, through the employment
verification pilot program as jointly administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
and the Social Security Administration or any of its successor programs, the employment
eligibility of each employee hired after December 31, 2007, and that it shall require its
subcontractors and sub-subcontractors to provide the same warranties to DP. DP acknowledges
that a breach of this warranty by DP or by any subcontractor or sub-subcontractor under this
Agreement shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement, and is grounds for penalties,
including termination of this Agreement, by Owner. Owner retains the right to inspect the records
of any DP, subcontractor and sub-subcontractor employee who performs work under this
Agreement, and to conduct random verification of the employment records of DP and any
subcontractor and sub-subcontractor who works on this Agreement, to ensure that DP and each
subcontractor and sub-subcontractor is complying with the warranties set forth above. DP shall
be responsible for all costs associated with compliance with this requirement.
13.22 INFLUENCE:
As prescribed in MCI-1202 of the Maricopa County Procurement Code, any effort to influence an
employee or agent to breach the Maricopa County Ethical Code of Conduct or any ethical
conduct, may be grounds for Disbarment or Suspension under MCI-902. An attempt to influence
includes, but is not limited to:
13.22.1 A person offering or providing a gratuity, gift, tip, present, donation, money, entertainment
or educational passes or tickets, or any type valuable contribution or subsidy,
13.22.2 That is offered or given with the intent to influence a decision, obtain a contract, garner
favorable treatment, or gain favorable consideration of any kind.
13.23 NON-DISCRIMINATION:
CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all provisions and requirements of Arizona Executive
Order 2009-09 including flow down of all provisions and requirements to any subcontractors.
Executive Order 2009-09 supersedes Executive order 99-4 and amends Executive order 75-5
and may be viewed and downloaded at the Governor of the State of Arizona's website
http://www.azoovernoroovidms/upload/E0 2009 09.pdf which is hereby incorporated into this
contract as if set forth in full herein. During the performance of this contract, CONTRACTOR shall
not discriminate against any employee, client or any or any other individual in any way because of
that person's age, race, creed, color, religion, sex, disability or national origin.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 36
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
MM
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County of Maricopa, Arizona, has caused this Agreement to be
executed by the undersigned and the seal of the County to be set hereto; and said DP has
caused this Agreement to be executed by the undersigned and the seal of DP set hereto on this
day and year first above written.
THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA
RECOMMENDED
By
Department Head Date
ATTEST
By
Chairman, Board of Supervisor's County Clerk
LEGAL REVIEW:
Approved as to form and legality for the use
and reliance of the County of Maricopa,
Arizona, only.
County Attorney
WHEN DP IS A CORPORATION OR PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
ATTEST
&zoap
Name of Corporation
Secretary
(Corporate Seal) DP's Registration No.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 37
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
WHEN DP IS AN INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP
ATTEST
Witness:
Legal name of Partnership
Witness: By:
Legal name (Title, if any)
WHEN DP IS A JOINT VENTURE
Legal name of firm Legal name firm
By: By:
Signature Signature
Legal name and title Legal name and title
ATTEST
Witness Witness
Witness Witness
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 38
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

EXHIBIT 'A': HOURLY RATE AND HOURS
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 39
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

6/22/2016
- - 6,454 - - 3,832 - - 3,232 - - 500 - - 6,896 - - 500 21,414 as
Tricord Fire Protect up
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ roll
30-16120-00 - 69,950 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4,000 73,950 which
6/22/2016 Eco3d Scanning
16022
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ effort
of
- - 15,500 - - 18,320 - - 24,400 - - 2,704 - - 18,800 - - 7,000 86,724
SYSKA Elevator scope
# $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
# per
Job
Job 46,640 1,000 47,640 and
Willdan SSI
Date: DLR Owner rate work.
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
per NRG
- - - - - - - - - - - 2,998 - - 500
Willdan Code $10,450 $15,500 $15,500 $44,948
hours Plant
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
- 404 1,125 404 1,575 1,125 1,480 5,775 4,125 135 525 375 267 1,050 750 2,000 Rates, Central
Atherton Civil $48,075 $69,190
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Hourly is
C
14,530 4,478 253,067 15,792 7,172 405,249 25,288 11,953 675,416 42,147 545 30,778 1,921 6,113 345,403 21,554 60,700 - of Phase
MP&E $1,922,106 2
breakdown and
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
700 384 efforts.
3,570 5,754 203,202 3,158 9,213 117,260 5,058 15,356 195,433 8,429 8,906 7,853 99,943 4,311 11,900 - Build-Out
DLR Structure $700,429
discipline's these
Department $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
building of
50,230 15,862 464,004 12,634 25,400 743,033 20,231 42,334 33,718 1,929 56,433 1,537 21,649 765,502 17,243 38,530 - or each
Architecture 1,238,388 3,548,657 firm's main
of
a is
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ by B
Management { specifics
up
Services TOTAL 68,330 96,448 32,709 42,189 51,702 71,122 88,420 3,309 99,846 4,216 35,882 43,858 111,130 15,000 Phase
1,000,751 1,304,769 2,158,144 1,287,232 6,515,058 backed the
work,
Madison Sum Phase $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ be indicate
Facilities firm/discipline
Lump Exp. shall Demolition to
Constr.
West Phase Scope Pre-Design SD SD SD DD DD DD CD CD CD Bid Bid Bid CA CA CA TOTAL costs split
for Reimb. that is is
County Post
225 phase for A effort
Hours
ID: Summary N 2 o. 1B 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 7B 8B totals Phase
All CA
Total 1 2 3 Group
Maricopa Project Effort 1.0% 1.5% 15.4% 0.5% 0.6% 20.0% 0.8% 1.1% 33.1% 1.4% 0.1% 1.5% 0.1% 0.6% 19.8% 0.7% 1.7% 0.2% 100%
Fee Notes DLR
%

6/22/2016
2,690 10,600 7,600 46,600 79,724 20,914 44,448 46,640 69,960 328,866 - - 76,216 84,722 64,199 32,200 67,300 8,050 -
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 Total Total
16022 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
# Job t Job - - - - - - - - - - - 9,941 11,051 8,374 4,200 - 1,050 -
DLR FEE DLR FEE
Date: DLR Owner $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
,
- 500 500 1,000 7,000 500 500 1,000 4,000 15,000 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 3,000 1,000
Expense Allowance Expense Allowance
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
2,690 10,500 7,500 46,500 79,724 20,914 44,448 46,640 69,950 328,866 - - 66,275 73,671 55,825 28,000 67,300 7,000 -
Sub Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Sub Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
P.C. - - - - P.O.
$ $ $ $
267 1,050 750 18,800 6,896 2,998 46,640 77,401 15,975 14,226 8,665 3
C.A. CA.
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Phase 135 525 375 2,704 500 4,239 Phase - 4,638 3,740
B.N B.N
Department Service $ $ $ $ $ $ Service $ $ $ $
C.D. 1,480 5,775 4,125 24,400 3,232 15,500 54,512 C.D. 21,475 27,350 18,600 28,000 22,700
Design Design
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Management D.D. 404 1,575 1,125 18,320 3,832 15,500 40,756 D.D. - 16,700 20,118 17,260 14,800 7,000
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
S.D. 404 1,575 1,125 46,500 15,500 6,454 10,450 69,950 151,958 S.D. - 12,125 7,339 7,560 29,800
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Facilities
Fee 12 FEE Inc.
Inc.
Project Sum Plant Chapter SUM Hoover System Inc. Design
County Summary Out Group System Systems Systems
Madison Lump Demo Engineering Build Engineering Central Engineering Engineering Scanning LUMP Allowance Owner) Conant Rep. Systems Design
Fee In Survey Design Hennessy Engineering Inspections IN by IT AV Elect. Consulting Air Management Forensics Allowance
Maricopa West Design Design Design Site Protection Study Built SERVICES Est. Visual in Mckay A.V. Air Group Fiber
225 Consultant Service Consultant Civil Atherton Civil Atherton Civil Atherton Civil Atherton Elevator SYSKA Fire Tricord Code VVilldan Special VVilldan As 3d Service Consultant Cost (Provided Audio Included Acoustics MCH, & I.T. Fairborn Security Fairborn Firefighters Rescue Smoke Sturc. VVilldan, Carbon DLR Group
3D Eco DLR
2.4 2.4 2.4 4.2 21.3 28.0 29.2 31.1 31.4 TOTAL 11.1 17.0 17.1 20.0 21.1 28.1 291 31.3 33.0 DLR

- 4 6/22/2016
Not Used
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 11/12/1943
$
1950 3973 6299 47 2756 15025
# # Engineering HRS
Job Job DLR
Date: DLR Owner
A7.5
$0 $0 $7,990 $0 $0 item
FEE $275.360 $533,105 $817,950 $385,920 2,020,325
Engineering in
DLR
Additions
$
3522 4980 8777 399 4808 22486 A7.10.
HRS
Summary Architect
DLR A.7.9,
A6.3 in 4
Scope $0 $0 $0 $0 Page
and FEE $444,240 $629,700 $1,091.720 $61,120 $581,465 2,808,245 owner and reductions
Fee Architect to A6.1
Department DLR item hrs.
Summary $ assistance hrs 131
$0 $0 $0 $0 A4.4 114
$719,600 $1,162,805 $1,909,670 $69,110 $967,385 4,828,570 and doc reduced
Services SERVICE TOTAL bid reduced
Management A4.2 A5.11 overall
Basic $ item item overall
5/31/16 in hrs. in Engineer
Engineering 60 hrs Engineer and
Facilities dated 73
and increased reduced and Architect
proposal Architect
Project SERVICES
County Architectural SERVICES from Architect Architect services
Madison ANALYSIS SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL phase Group
DISCRIPTION PREDESIGN SUBTOTAL changes phase phase phase
Maricopa West Group SITE S.D. D.D. C.D. BIDDING C.A. P.C. of DD CD Bidding CA DLR
225 DLR A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.6 A.7 A.8 A.9 Notes 1 2 3 4

. i
.$75'
ENG:•• SUPPORT :
i
..• . E - ..:- $100:
30-16120-00 • 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 ENG. TECH '•::
16022 ., . •
-
• ••$100
ENG: JC
:•
•.•
#
# Job . : • • .
Job • •$135:
Owner ....8NG..• :PE •• 12
Date: DLR •
..! . $1,70
ENG. PM 20
•
ENG.. .SENIOR $230
-
• .
05:
ARCH.. SUPPORT - 40 88
• .
... ; .00
•
ARCH.... .$1 160
::•::,:TECH :
...•
.. ,
.: $100: • • • •
ARCH. ;IC 80 40 300 200. 200
•
••'
,
-
..:•;• :$135 . ,
•:::•.ARCEL.,.: PA - 40 40 80 60 16 20 180 100
:
. • 5
•
• r 3170..
ARCH.......„ PM 0 40 20 85 12 220 80 40 Page
.• •.•••
:.
,ARCH.... SENIOR .12 20 :,•,.
! II,:
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1224
I
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 148 60 80 160 120 201 0 34 4 0 o 0 1210 700 500 0 0 0 0
meetings
of of volumes
project
work Proiect execution invoices, community
Management the the materials materials and
and the for areas
for and and and
work prepared certifications, explanatory
disciplines processing process. regulations agency systems dimensions,
architectural documents out graphic at DOCUMENTATION plans elevations
for behalf building (DOCUMENTATION
Facilities involved requirements, close applicable and building
the of consultants and of approximate
Owner's
Services coordination between other checking contract written and sections selection sketch(s)
and of insurance consultations critical on site of
SERVICES Meetings minutes and of of model(s) DESIGN
and
County Schedule A/E Consultant Coordination enaineerino Management contracts, payments Research Preparation Appearances ARCHITECTURAUDESIGN Conceptual Preliminary Preliminary Development Perspective
Project Meeting Review Agency Study
Group
Basic SERVICES STRUCTURAL
Scope PREDESIGN -01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 -01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .o6 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 DLR
Group
Maricopa and S.D. A.3.1 A.3.2 A.3.3 A.3.4 A.3.5
Fee DLR A.1 A.3

SUPPORT
.
30-16120-00 ...ITCH .. .. : 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 ENG.. .10 .10 10 10 24
16022 .
.•
• • •
ENG. 10 10 10 10 10%; 10%; 10: 10: 16 24 24
#
# Job
Job • • • •
: :
ENG... PE 16 16 16 16 •:16 •:16 24 24 16 .24 '16 16 16
Date: DLR Owner
•
•
ENG...
24 24 24 24 24 24 16
• •
•
ISENIOR
.SUPPORT
:TECH
:
ARCH::
ARCH. PA 50 60
6
ARCH. PM 20 20 Page
ARCH. SENIOR
ENG. TASK HOURS 2 2 6 6 50 50 60 60 60 60 42 42 0 0 0 0 58 58 0 0 40 64 40 88 40 40 32 72 0 0 o o 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o o 0 0 TO 80 0 0 0
the
with architectural
and
systems consistent
Management alternative
disciplines
materials, standard
of
other
quality suitability
of
architectural
DOCUMENTATION and and equipment.
activities
Facilities systems systems distribution criteria
requirements requirements DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION alarms system requirements RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS potential availability and
Services ventilating ventilating communications DOCUMENTATION systems work systems their similar
and and
source(s) source(s) conservation conservation mechanical mechanical systems systems systems electrical systems of and of systems of
DESIGN! and and space space service space utility utilities
conditioning conditioning protection protection detection protection
County Schedule A/E Telephones Identification Investigation Coordination
Energy Energy Energy Energy Heating Heating Plumbing Plumbing Special Special Process Process General General Power Lighting Security Electronic Special General On-site Off-site Drainage Paving equipment materials,
Air Air Fire Fire Fire DESIGN! Fire Group
Basic MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL MATERIALS
Scope .01 .01 .02 .02 .03 .03 .04 .04 .05 .05 .06 .06 .07 .07 .08 .08 .09 .09 .10 .10 .11 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 CIVIL .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
Group
Maricopa and A.3.6 A.3.7 A.3.8 A.3.11
Fee DLR

$75 $225
ENG. SUPPORT 3
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH 92 $100 $9,200 6/22/2016
16022
ENG.. JC 324 $100 $32,400
#
# Job
Job ENG. PE 805 $135 $108,675 12
Date: DLR Owner
$170
PM 702 $119,340
ENG: :SENIOR 24 $230 $5,520
,.:! '
SUPPORT 128 $75 $9,600 60 40
ARCH: „ TECH 720 $100 $72,000
ARCH. JC 820 $1013 $82,000 45
ARCH. PA 1064 $135 $143,640 40 100 60 20 20
7
ARCH. PM 745 $170 $126,650 1W 20 40 20 6 Page
ARCH. SENIOR 45 $230 $10,350 • 12
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 1950 1950 $275,360 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 61 81 13 3522 3522 $444,240 182 60 80 0 0 190 125 110 0 38 4 0 0 0 0
meetings
of of
work Project Project execution invoices, materials community
Management the the
COST CHECKING and the for for and and
work prepared certifications, explanatory agency
disciplines processing process.
SCHEDULING CONSTRUCTION PHASE architectural documents for out regulations graphic at behalf
Facilities the involved requirements, close and
THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT other of consultants CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL Owner's
Services PROBABLY HOURS W/ coordination between and checking of insurance contract consultations applicable written on
DEVELOPMENT HOURS $/HR FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes and and of of
County Schedule A/E OF TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project Meeting Consultant Coordination engineering Review Management contracts, payments Agency Research Preparation Appearances
PRESENTATIONS Group
Basic PROJECT STATEMENT SERVICES PROJECT DISCIPLINES
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 AGENCY .°1 .02 -03 .04 .05 .06 DLR
Maricopa and Group A.3.12 A.3.13 A.3.14 D.D. A.4.1 A.4.2 AA,3
Fee DLR A.4

ENG.,
SUPPORT
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH 6/22/2016
16022
,
ENG. JC 80 240 20 180E 240 240 240
#
# Job
Job • •
ENG: PE 260 140 :.'10 20 10 100 160 160 160
Date: DLR Owner
: : .
ENG. Pm 140 40 64 30 170 130 .:•110 160 160 160
• • •
SENIOR 24 .24
ARCH, SUPPORT
ARCH: TECH 480 380 220
JC 420 300 200
ARCH.
:
ARCH. PA 480 360 300 12:
8
PM 120 100 Page
ARCH.
•
'ARCH: SENIOR 36
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 480 420 0 0 58 87 0 0 60 370 490 184 0 0 72 0 0 584 584 560 0 o 0 0
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 1816 1140 820 0 12 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
systems
Management components
components communications
capacities major
dimensions lists of
DOCUMENTATION structural and and
and criteria clearances materials sizes layouts clearances control capacities layouts clearances
Facilities elevations details sketch(s) major or equipment electrical equipment
selections DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION system criteria of DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION equipment and vibration and and
Services and design equipment for lighting, sizes equipment for
construction dimensional layouts design sizing coordination specifications space chases and space chases DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION
sections model(s) materials structural structural for
County Schedule A/E ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Equipment Foundation Preliminary Approximate Preliminary Required Required Acoustical Approximate Preliminary Required Required
Plans, Typical Three Study Final Basic Final Critical Outline Criteria Group
Basic STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 CIVIL DLR
Group
Maricopa and A.4.4 A.4,5 A.4.6 A.4.7 A.4.8
Fee DLR

$75 $225
ENG: SUPPORT 3
•
•. $100 $0 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 _ENG. 'TECH 0
16022
• $100
ENG... JC 1454 $145,400
#
# Job Job • • ••• $135
Owner ENG. PE • 1232 $166,320
Date: DLR
ENG. :•• ••••.PM 1236 $170 $210,120 16
•••• • 'SENIOR: 48 $230 $11,040
••.i•
$75
SUPPORT 140 $10,500 60 22
- $100
ARCH.' TECH 1060 $106,000
. • '
ARCH....:: ••••..IC • ,I0 1080 $100 $108,000 90 40
• •
•':
ARCH. PA BO 00 • 1640 $135 $221,400 40 40 100 60 20 20
. • •
: 9
ARCH: • PM 40 " '40. 1000 $170 $170,000 110 20 40 20 38 Page
..
HARCH. ,:SENIOR 60 $230 $13,800 12
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 0 0 0 3973 3973 $533,105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 130 100 0 62 82 14 4980 4980 $629,700 182 60 80 0 0 190 120 84 0 38 4 0 0 0
lists of their
itemized materials, standards and outline of of
equipment and work Proiect. Project execution invoices,
Management or architectural quality criteria the and the the for meetings
Specifications and and disciplines COST CHECKING for and
design work prepared certifications, agency
significant criteria systems other disciplines processing process.
outline their of including CONSTRUCTION PHASE architectural documents for out at
of and materials, activities lists SCHEDULING involved requirements, close regulations behalf
Facilities RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS architectural identification standards. manual materials THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the of consultants CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL Owner's
Services of equipment architectural quality similar of design or PROBABLY HOURS WI coordination between other and checking of insurance contract consultations applicable on
form and of DEVELOPMENT HOURS 5/HR FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes and and of
County Schedule A/E Development brief systems significant and criteria Coordination Production Specifications OF TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project Meeting Consultant Coordination engineering Review Management contracts, payments Agency Research Appearances
and PRESENTATIONS Group
Basic MATERIALS PROJECT STATEMENT SERVICES PROJECT DISCIPLINES AGENCY
Scope .01 .02 •03 .04 -01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
Maricopa and Group A.4.11 A.4.12 A.4.13 A.4.14 C.D. 5.1 A. A.5.2 A.5.3
Fee DLR A.5

ENG. SUPPORT 3 $75 $225
• ••:••
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 .:E:NG: •"••••TECH 1405 $100 $140,500 6/22/2016
16022 :• •
• $100
ENG.' •iJC 1274 $127,400
# •
# Job ,• •
Job .ENG. ,PE••••, 1859 $135 $250,965
Date: DLR Owner
•• $170
PM 1758 $298,860 20
••••
„ENG:. SENIOR 0 $230
: '
$75
SUPPORT 202 $15,150
•• . $100
• TECH 2300 $230,000
• '.•••••••
ARCH. JC• 2130 $100 $213,000
ARCH. • PA 2180 $135 $294,300
10
• $170
ARCH. PM 20 40 .450' 40 1878 $319,260 50 Page
•SENIOR. 87 $230 $20,010
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 0 0 0 0 0 6299 6299 $817,950 10 0 20 0 0
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 7360 0 0 0 0 30 45 458 84 42 8777 8777 $1,091,720 79 62 52 0 154
Bidding the quality Project. Contract,
of of the of other the
conditions between and Specifications workmanship, of other the of
Management preparation preparation by
and Agreement Supplementary, construction conditions
and place and architectural equipment, the Specifications
development time, of development for of including
DOCUMENTATION the form(s) (General, of and required Specifications. PHASE
Facilities DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION in and in preparation systems development Manual
RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS Owner describe forms, Contract criteria and THIS OH/P
Services DOCUMENTATION the which r.antrantnifc) Owner the and materials, the of Project WI Review
DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN to bidding the of performance of Documents HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule A/E ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Assistance Documents bidding, and to Conditions Conditions) Development describing Coordination disciplines Compilation Bidding TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SERVICES Coordination Reproduction Completeness
DESIGN Own, Assistance and Group
Basic STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL MATERIALS ADDENDA
Scope CIVIL .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
Maricopa and Group A.5.4 A.5.5 A.5.6 A.5.7 A.5.8 A.5.11 BIDDING A.6.1 A.6.2
Fee DLR A.6

$75 $0
ENG. SUPPORT 0
$100 $0 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH o
16022
$100 $0
ENG. JC o . 40 80 80
#
# Job $0
Job $135 .
ENG. .PE o . 40
Date: MR Owner
$170 $7,990 .
ENG. PM 16 47 ioo .:120
$230 $0
ENG. SENIOR o
E
$75 $o
ARCH. SUPPORT o 10 240 220 200 120
$100 $800
ARCH. TECH 8
•
ARCH. JC 42 $100 $4,200
$135 .:
ARCH. PA 126 $17,010 210 so 320: So' 40
11
$170
ARCH. PM 20 203 $34,510 4o 20 :so .10 20 95 Page
-
ARCH. SENIOR 1 20 $230 $4,600
$7,990
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 16 o o 0 1 o 0 0 47 47 0 o 20 180 o o 320 0 320 0 36 0
$61,120
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 2 30 2 0 14 2 2 0 o 399 399 268 20 20 60 40 500 390 270 298 269
a and
as Architect's of
and Samples
and Documents Project Owner-supplied Owner-supplied of, I execution invoices,
Management the Data s•- and/or
proposers for review and
Bidding for for Project •• Contractor certifications,
or Contract(s) furnished receipt, processing process,
Bidders the installation installation submittals
conferences of of BIDDING COORDINATION data criteria ADMINISTRATION including Drawings, Owner; for out
Facilities from proposals of data and and • to required of requirements, close
interpretations opening(s) ALTERNATES/SUBSTITUTIONS award FOR OH/P Owner Ship ,/-* as file consultants
Services pre-bid questions or on coordination the establishing obtaining delivery delivery furnishings, submittals, on -• submittals master contract
in or bid Bids HOURS HOURS W/ DATA of of of action of of communications of insurance
to at of $/HR FEE in in and of I representatives and
Schedule A/E Recommendation and CONSTRUCTION ••
County Participation Responses clarifications Attendance OF Evaluation TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Review responsibility Assistance Assistance Coordination equipment Coordination furniture Processing appropriate Distribution Maintenance Related Management contracts, payments
OWNER-SUPPLIED ,,- • field Group
Basic SERVICES
Scope .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 ANALYSIS .°1 .02 .03 .04 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .os OFFICE .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 DLR
Group
Maricopa and A.6.3 A.6.4 A.6.5 C.A. A.7.1 A.7.2
Fee DLR A.7

ENG. SUPPORT
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 'ENG. TECH 6/22/2016
16022
:
ENG. JC 80 80 40 40
#
# Job
Job
PE 80 BO 40 40
Date: DLR Owner
ENG. PM 80 80 40 40
ENG. SENIOR
ARCH. SUPPORT 40
:
ARCH. TECH: 200 so 80
.
E
ARCH. JC 280 100 :20
:
.
-
:::ARCH. PA 60 20 320 100 iso 20 80
" •
12
ARCH.! 40 20 50 40 0 '1 10 20 20 16 . . . .12 Page
• . . •
'ARCH. SENIOR
ENG. TASK HOURS o 0 24 0 o 240 240 0 120 0 120 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 o
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 2 2 40 60 100 30 842 300 260 60 10 12 460 21 50 16 48 12
'
of to costs
the with to Work. to relative modified of for to the and Contract
by frequency Work the and or time relative of the
required behalf of agencies notifications in supplemental response behalf reasonableness in notifications the of by order
Management and frequency. Drawings deleted Modifications certification
testing Owner's status inspection and deficiencies of in Owner's of changes behalf modified. Work account submitted change
procedures of and tests revisions added, for to Owner's or and
field on agencies and and distribution Interpretations the ORDERS distribution be materials relative deleted appropriate approvals, the in on Payment data under
of procedures observed Contractor(s1 on schedule to Contractor(s) on payments
standards, inspection testing testing inspections and and and Work and added, of changes for expense performed
Facilities OBSERVATION coordination and inspection. by of by Instructions and from labor Contractor(s) communications, to MONITORING of thereof. of
scope, and and standards, on reproduction reproduction describe of recommendations be to preparation Construction relative records Applications work
Services and inspections testing inspection compliance Contractor(s) Specifications clarification Owner's rewirements REQUESTS/CHANGE to proposals costs Completion with changes evaluation for
FIELD Documents for testing scope, reports and proposed the for of of of
Schedule Recommending and of and for of and in SCHEDULE all and
County A/E Administration Contract Arranging Notifying requiring Evaluating required Review Preparation, Drawings, eauests Forwarding changed Preparation, Specifications Review quantities Review Substantial Negotiations Work Assisting Contract(s) Coordination recordkeeping Maintenance and Evaluation Review Contractor(s) arrangements.
testing Owner of Sum Group
Basic CONSTRUCTION QUOTATION
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 DLR
Group
Maricopa and A.7.3 A.7.5 A.7.6 A.7.7 A.7.8 A.7.9
Fee DLR

$75 $0 $75 $675
ENG. SUPPORT 0 9
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. :TECH 0 $100 $0 1497 $100 $149,700 6/22/2016
16022
ENG. :jC 720 $100 $72,000 3772 $100 $377,200
# : •
# Job
Job PE 46 920 $135 $124,200 4816 $135 $650,160
Date: DLR Owner . .
$170 $170
PM 40 40 .46 40 . 1116 $189,720 4859 $826,030
.ENG. SENIOR 0 $230 $0 72 $230 $16,560
$75 $75
ARCH. SUPPORT 80 910 $68,250 1380 $103,500
ARCH. TECH 440 $100 $44,000 4528 $100 $452,800
ARCH. JC 760 $100 $76,000 4832 $100 $483,200
$135 $135
ARCH. PA 40 1923 $259,605 6933 $935,955
13
ARCH. PM 12 12 744 $170 $126,480 — 4570 $170 $776,900 Page
..
ARCH. :SENIOR 31 $230 $7,130 243 $230 $55,890
ENG. TASK HOURS 120 40 0 0 80 80 80 0 0 0 2756 2756 $385,920 15025 15025 $2,020,325
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 234 12 12 8 52 4 16 5 3 2 4808 4809 $581,465 22486 22486 $2,808,245
representative the verify or completion to final is in releases liens the to
any, of Work found final against any,
to completed final if making the verify receipts, if
Management Owner's Documents be until sureties, the Completion that deficiencies to Owner sureties, ADMIN.
the to or or of affidavits, the or
with Contract items withheld surety age Contractor(s) representative surety Payment
List) the of be of retain Substantial acceptance Contractor(s) warranties, indemnifying of for CONSRUCT. SERVICE
Punch to Contractor(s) to consent of of the by and any Owner's consent
Facilities ( Work amounts of release notice and if the of bonds of payment(s) Certificate(s) FOR OH/P THIS OH/P
Services inspection the of the by the of receipt partial Certificate(s) upon inspection Owner inspection(s), with work the transmittal or lien receipt W/ W/
and or in of final to inspection of and of and Ala( final of HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule A/E CLOSEOUT detailed conformity submitted corrected. Determination Securing reduction payment(s) Insurance Inspection(s) for Notification follow-up completion Review waivers Securing of making Issuance TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
A for list ready Final and Group
Basic PROJECT
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 DLR
Maricopa and Group A.7.10
Fee DLR

104 228 130 277 148 829 249 286 2250
Hrs
MPE DLR
6/22/2016
FEE 14,530 - 30,840 14,430 33,540 18,805 106,703 30,260 - 29,860 278,968
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 MPE DLR
16022
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
28 776 106 148 166 273 112 1608
Hrs
Struct. DLR .
# FEE 3,570 129,200 12,420 18,805 21,341 38,875 - 11,900 236,111
# Job Struct.
Job DLR
Date: DLR Owner $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
18,128 129,976 30,840 - - 14,430 46,066 37,758 128,209 69,408 - 41,872 516,686
Engineers TOTALS
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Summary 298 110 1366 248 149 557 296 663 842 1010 192 5730
Hrs
Architect
DLR 14
Scope Page
and FEE 50,230 - 16,600 149,095 28,390 19,390 66,360 37,610 85,362 107,175 132,200 21,930 714,342
Fee Architect DLR
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ formulas)
Department 50,230 - 16,600 149,095 28,390 19,390 66,360 37,610 85,362 107,175 132,200 21,930 714,342 coordination in
ARCH. TOTAL delivery (error
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ programming design phased design
equipment
68,358 129,976 47,440 149,095 28,390 33,820 112,426 75,368 213,571 176,583 132,200 63,802 1,231,028 interiors Plant
Management SERVICE TOTAL detailed 27.0 demolition
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5/31/16: A.1 9.0 A.5, A.5, 25 Central
Summary item item A.6, in
dated in item in hrs
Facilities Design Rep. Drawings hours in hours item 74
Services, Delivery hrs in added
Model Finishes Project proposal 156 164 156 hrs
Project SERVICES Coordination Hardscape Design Design Record 47
County Programming SERVICES Analysis SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES Phased Time from reduced reduced reduced added Engineer
Madison Additional Design / Bridge Plant SERVICES Part SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL Group
DISCRIPTION PREDESIGN Detailed ANALYSIS SPECIAL Structural ENERGY Commissioning DESIGN Interiors Signage Equipment Landscape Courts Central BIDDING Demolition Site As-Constructed SUBTOTAL changes Architect Architect Architect Architect Architect DLR
Maricopa West Group CA. On P.C. of
1.1 4.5 24.3 9.0 18.0 27.0 8.1 8.2 7.2 25.0 12.0 15.0 Notes 1 3 4 5
225 DLR A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.6 A.7 A.8 A.9

$0.00
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# Job # Job $75.00
CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
'TECHNICAL $100.00
SUPPORT $75.00
JOB CAPTAIN $100.00
PROJECT ARCHITECT $135.00 14
PROJECT MANAGER $170.00 14 16 18 30::: 15
Page
SENIOR DESIGNER $230.00 14
Department
TASK HOURS 42 4 12 15 21 17 0 9 4 0 14 0 28 8 18 5 0 0
Management personnel
criteria of patterns
and responsibilities Evaluation: Familiariation: DIAGRAMS flow
Facilities limitations systems material functions equipment SCHEDULING
Services coordination functional expandability and Ocauparicy facilities, FLOW / and allocations operating and expandability
ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes PHASE objectives, requirements relations and and equipment requirements Building Functions vehicular space of facilities handling and DEVELOPMENT BUDGETING
County Schedule Additional Programming Project Meeting Consultant Design Space Space Number Flexibility Special Site Post Lures Other CONCEPTUAL Internal Human, General Analysis Adjacency Special Materials Flexibility PRESENTATIONS
Scope PROJECT .01 .02 03 . .04 PROGRAMMING .01 .02 .03 .o4 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 SPACE .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 PROJECT PROJECT Group
Detailed DLR
Maricopa and Architectural A.1.0 A.1.1 A.1.2 A.1.3 A.1.4 A.1.5
Fee 1.1

, $0
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
6/2212016 30-16120-00 OTHER:: 0 0 0 6/22/2016
16022
# Job # Job $75.00 $0 $75.00 $4,050 $75.00 $0
'CLERICAL: 0 22 16 16 54 0
Date: DLR Owner
$0
TECHNICAL 0 $100.00 388 98 77 563 $100.00 $56,300 80 40 120 $100.00 $12,000
:SUPPORT: 0 $75.00 80 19 8 107 $75.00 $8,025 8 16 $75.00 $1,200
CAPTAIN 0 $100.00 $0 156 85 59 300 $100.00 $30,000 18 12 30 $100.00 $3,000
PROJECT. ARCHITECT: 74 $135.00 $9,990 118 56 38 212 $135.00 $28,620 16 12 10 . 12 50 $135.00 $6,750
•
PROJECT. MANAGER 188 $170.00 $31,960 76 38 16 130 $170.00 $22,100 10 10 4 32 $170.00 $5,440 16
Page
SENIOR.: DESIGNER: 36 $230.00 $8,280 0 $230.00 $0 0 $230.00 $0
Department
TASK HOURS 298 298 $50,230 840 312 214 1366 1366 $149,095 26 126 20 76 248 248 $28,390
contract
Management design graphics purchased with signage
finishes owner furniture DESIGN layouts for SIGNAGE
PHASE and including of signage specifications
Facilities THIS OH/P FINISHES layouts specifications coordination purchased INTERIOR OH/P interior package INTERIOR OH/P
Services 1Aft Interiors and owner W/ and and user signage W/
HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE AND of and layout of HOURS HOURS $IHR FEE Exterior documents with for HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule Additional TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SERVICES DESIGN Preparation documents Design furniture Coordination vendor TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SIGNAGE Prepare Design Meetings CDs Final TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Scope INTERIOR .01 .02 .03 INTERIOR .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 .06 Group
SPECIAL DLR
Maricopa and Architectural A.3.10 A.4.10
Fee A.3

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0,
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER: 0 0 0 6/22/2016
16022
# Job # Job $75.00 $0 $75.00 $150 $75.00 $1,500
"CLERICAL 0 2 20 20
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 0 $100.00 $0 40 40 $100.00 $4,000 220 220 $100.00 $22,000
$75.00 $0 $75.00 $450 $75.00 $750
:::SUPPORT 0 6 6 10 10
.joi5 CAPTAIN 0 $100.00 $0 15 15 $100.00 $1,600 20 BO 12 112 $100.00 $11,200
:
$135.00 $8,100 $135.00 $5,130 $135.00 $10,260
:HPROjECT :ARCHITECT 60 20 12 38 20 40 16 76
•
PROJECT !MANAGER 50 $170.00 $8,500 32 8 48 $170.00 $8,160 20 60 32 112 $170.00 $19,040 17
Page
SENIOR DESIGNER 0 $230.00 $0 0 $230.00 $0 1 2 4 7 $230.00 $1,610
Department :
TASK HOURS 110 0 110 110 $16,600 115 20 14 149 149 $19,390 61 432 64 557 557 $66,360
Management the for the
document furniture and disciplines for
and coordinate COORDINATION work prepared
layouts collect architectural involved specifications LANDSCAPE
COMMISSIONING COORDINATION equip to other / documents
Facilities OH/P and review to vendor EQUIP OH/P the and of FOR OH/P
Services services W/ furniture user equip County WI between documentation checking W/
HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE EQUIPMENT with and with HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE HARDSCAPE engineering and HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule Additional Commissioning TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Preliminary Meetings furniture Meetings package TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Coordination of work Project and Design Review Project TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
COMMISSIONING LANDSCAPE the Group
Scope .01 .02 INTERIORS .01 .02 -03 .01 .02 .03
DLR
Maricopa and Architectural A.4.17 A.5.13 A.5J4
Fee

$0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 6/22/2016
16022
# # ,
Job Job CLERICAL 20 36 $75.00 $2,700
Date: DLR Owner
$0
TECHNICAL 0 $100.00
=
SUPPORT 50 80 130 $75.00 $9,750
40B CAPTAIN. 64 68 $100.00 $6,800
PROJECT ARCHITECT 76 36 14 20 216 441 $135.00 $59,535
===
PROJECT MANAGER : 20= 30 10 100 167 $170.00 $28,390 18
:= Page
$230.00, $0
SENIOR DESIGNER .= 0
Department .=:===.:...
TASK HOURS 210 66 10 4 16 0 60 20 28 412 842 842 $107,175
MONTHS
and 7 TO of, Data, Contract and/or
Management proposers 6 OF review Project the
or Bidding receipt, by Contractor required
Bidders the of DURATION Drawings, required Owner, as submittals DEMOLITION
conferences from including Ship to of
Facilities Reproduction interpretations opening(s) on submittals representatives file FOR OH/P
Services Delivery PACKAGE Documents Review pre-bid questions bid ADMINISTRATION submittals, action other submittals master communications WI
of and in to or at of and of field of HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule Additional Phased BID Production Coordination Completeness Participation Responses clarifications Documents Attendance EVALUATION Processing appropriate Samples Documents Distribution Architects Maintenance Related TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
DEMOLITION ADDENDA BIDDING CONSTRUCTION and Group
Scope .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 BID .01 .02 .03 .04
Demolition DLR
Maricopa and and Architectural A.6.1 A.6.2 A.6.3 A.6.4 A.6.5
Fee 25

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0 0 6/22/2016
16022
# #
Job Job CLERICAL 100 100 $75.00 $7,600 0 $75.00 212 $75.00 $15,900
Date: DLR Owner
$0
TECHNICAL 0 $100.00 100 100 $100.00 $10,000 1043 $100.00 $104,300
20 20 $75.00 $1,600 0 $75.00 289 $76.00 $21,675
SUPPORT
: JOB CAPTAIN 0 $100.00 $0 42 42 $100.00 $4,200 567 $100.00 $56,700
PROJECT ARCHITECT 820 820 $135.00 $110,700 22 22 $135.00 $2,970 1793 $135.00 $242,055
PROJECT: MANAGER 60 60 $170.00 $10,200 .28 28 $170.00 $4,760 815 $170.00 $138,550 19
:: Page
, $0
SENIOR 10 10 $230.00 $2,300 0 $230.00 53 $230.00 $12,190
DESIGNER
Department :
TASK HOURS 0 1010 1010 1010 $132,200 0 0 0 192 192 192 $21,930 4772 4772 $458,980
on
Management ADMIN. contractor(s) them by initial concealed submitted data, as others .a8built.reciird.d DRAWINGS
from certified the from of general and up
CONSRUCT. location information and Owner . .:M8ik8d RECORD SERVICES
Rep. Representative(s) Representative(s) obtaining Drawings construction the on of Contractor(s; drawings the to
Facilities Services FOR OH/P DRAWINGS for Record during and accuracy the identified, FOR OH/P ALL OH/P
Project REPRESENTATION Project Project HOURS HOURS W/ FEE arrangements parties made Documents general by to record of l'P'corporating:alf..POPtraPtors HOURS HOURS WI FEE HOURS HOURS W/ FEE
County Schedule Additional Time Full-time Part-Time TOTAL STAFF $/HR RATE TOTAL RECORD Making other changes Contract of Review certified Transmittal appropriately TOTAL STAFF $/HR RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF $/HR RATE TOTAL
and all and
Part PROJECT BUILT Group
Scope Site .01 .02 .03 .04 AS .01 .02 .03 .04 .05
DLR
Maricopa and Architectural On A.7.4 A.8.2.1
Fee 12

. $0.00 $0.00 $0
6/2212016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $75.00 $0
Job CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner
$100.00 $100.00 $0
TECHNICAL 0
. $75.00 $75.00 $0
SUPPORT 0
$100.00: $100.00 $600
JOB CAPTAIN 6
$13500 $135.00 $2,970
PROJECT ENGINEER 22
$17000 $170.00 $0
PROJECT MANAGER 0 20
$0 Page
$230.00 $230.00
SENIOR EXPERT 0
TASK HOURS 6 2 o 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 $3,570
Department
Management personnel
criteria of
and responsibilities systems PHASE
Facilities limitations expandability and THIS OH/P MODEL
Services ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination objectives, requirements relations functional and and equipment requirements HOURS HOURS $/HR WI FEE ANALYSIS
BUDGETING
County Schedule Programming Project Meeting Consultant Design Space Space Number Flexibility Special Site PRESENTATIONS TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SERVICES
Additional PROGRAMMING STRUCTURAL Group
Scope PROJECT .01 .02 .03 04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 PROJECT DLR
Maricopa and Detailed A.1.0 A.1.1 A.1.5 A.1.6 SPECIAL A.3.5
Structural
Fee 1.1 A.3

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
612212016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $300 $75.00 $0
Job CLERICAL 4 0
Date: DLR Owner
$100.00 $1,000 $100.00 $0
TECHNICAL 10 0
$75.00 $0 $75.00 $0
SUPPORT 0 0
$100.00 $1,800 $100.00 $6,800
JOB CAPTAIN 18 40 20 68
$135.00 $10,260 $135.00 $3,240
PROJECT ENGINEER 76 16 4 24 82 24 15
$170.00 $107,100 $170.00 $2,380
PROJECT MANAGER 630 6 14 10 16
21
$0 Page
$230.00 $8,740 $230.00
SENIOR EXPERT 38 0
TASK HOURS 776 776 $129,200 16 60 30 106 106 $12,420 104 41 31 0 6 0
Department
of clarifications
work Project. Project and
the the
Management and the for for DRAWINGS proposers
work prepared or Document:
disciplines specifications Bidders
PHASE architectural documents RECORD conferences
the involved / of Reproduction from Bidding opening(s)
Facilities THIS OH/P between other documentation FOR OH/P Delivery MATERIALS Review bid pre questions the of
Services HOURS HOURS WI FEE HARDSCAPE and checking HOURS HOURS W/ FEE and in to bid at
$1HR and and $/HR BID Completeness interpretations
County Schedule TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Coordination engineering Design Review TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Phased Production Coordination Participation Responses Attendance EVALUATION
Additional LANDSCAPE ition PRODUCTION ADDENDA BIDDING or Group
Scope .01 .02 •03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 -01 .02 -03 .04 .05 BID
DLR
Maricopa and A.5.14 Demo A.6.1 A.6.2 A.6.3 A.6.4
Structural 25
Fee

$0.00 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER o o o
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $300 $75.00 $0 $75.00 $600
Job CLERICAL 4 o a
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL $100.00 $0 $100.00 $8,400 $100.00 $7,400
o 64 74
::: $75.00 $150 $75.00 $0 $75.00 $150
SUPPORT 2 0 2
• $100.00 $500 $100.00 $2,800 $100.00 $12,500
JOB :CAPTAIN 5 28 125
$135.00 $25,515 $135.00 $2,700 $135.00 $44,685
:PROJECT ENGINEER 40 189 20 331
:
$0
$170.00 $12,410 $170.00 $170.00 $121,890
PROJECT MANAGER 16 73 0 717
22
$0 $0 Page
$230.00 $230.00 $230.00 $8,740
SENIOR EXPERT 0 o 38
TASK HOURS 58 8 8 12 273 273 $38,875 0 0 0 112 112 112 $11,900 1295 1295 $179,225
Department
field during of to
appropriate submittals other made location certified
and other Architects and the on and appropriately
of, and and/or changes and
Management review Samples contractor(s) all on construction. submitted data, DRAWINGS
receipt, Contractor from them Documents general directec .'ell;COritraOterariirked.tiO'ea-btiiitteOord:tfraWthgs
Data tments Owner, submittals by Contract during information and others as SERVICES
including Project of BIDDING obtaining certified of RECORD
Facilities ADMINISTRATION nom to rewired file FOR °HIP for initial installed accuracy drawings and FOR OH/P ALL OH/P
submittals, Drawings, Cnntract submittals as master communications WI DRAWINGS Drawings the as record Owner W/ W/
Services of Ship the of of HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE arrangements Record from systems general Contractor(s) of the to HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule Processing on action hv rewired Distribution representatives Maintenance Related TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL RECORD Making parties construction concealed of Review the Transmittal identified, MCorp. orating TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Additional CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BUILT by Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 AS .01 .02 .03 .04 .05
DLR
Maricopa and Structural A.6.5 P.C. A.8.2.1
Fee A.8

$0:00i: $0.00 $0
6/2212016 30-16120-00 OTHER • 0
116022 6/22/2016
# Job Job : $75.00 $75.00 $0
CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner : :
: $0
$100.00 $100.00
1:iTECHNICAL 0
::$75:00: $75.00 $0
SUPPORT 0
•
: : : $100.00 $100.00 $1,200
JOB CAPTAIN 12
:
: . $135.00 $135.00 $8,910
PROJECT ENGINEER 40 66
$170.00 $170.00 $4,420
PROJECT:: MANAGER: 26
23
. .: Page
$230.00 $230.00 $0
SENIOR EXPERT 0
•
TASK HOURS 14 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 4 8 104 104 614,530
Department
the
and
Services
Management personnel inaccuracies,
Additional criteria of capabilities capabilities capabilities cnbcai drawings
and responsibilities systems tor measured SCHEDULING PHASE
Facilities Electrical limitations expandability and SURVEYS structural mechanical electrical drawings required THIS OH/P
ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination objectives, requirements relations functional and equipment requirements measurements existing existing existing existing of HOURS HOURS W/ FEE
& and FACILITIES of of of ot DEVELOPMENT BUDGETING 5/HR
County Schedule Plumbing Programming Project Meeting Consultant PROGRAMMING Design Space Space Number Flexibility Special Site Photography Field Analysis Analysis Analysis Keview development PRESENTATIONS TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Scope PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .01 .02 ,03 .04 .05 .06 .07 EXISTING .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 PROJECT PROJECT Group
Detailed DLR
Maricopa and Mechanical, A.1.0 A.1.1 A.1.3 A.1.4 A.1.5 A.1.6
Fee 1.1

.. $0,00 , $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
6/2212016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0 0
416022
6/22/2016
# Job Job $75.00 $0 $75.00 $0 ' $75.00 $750
CLERICAL 0 0 : 10 10
Date: DLR Owner
.
$100.00 $3,000 $100.00 $6,000 ':: $100.00 $12,000
TECHNICAL 3 30 60 60 120 120
$75.00 $0 $75.00 $750 $75.00 $0
SUPPORT 0 10 10 0
::•. $100.00 $3,000 $100.00 $2,000 $100.00 $2,000
CAPTAIN 30 30 20 20 :20 20
:
.....• . $135.00 $16,200 $135.00 $4,320 $135.00 $10,800
PROJECT 'ENGINEER 120 120 20 12 32 : 20 80
.....60:.-
MANAGER.. $170.00 $6,800 $170.00 $1,360 $170.00 $7,990
PROJECT: 40 40 4 4 8 12 : :::20 15 47
;.. : 24
$0 $0 Page
$230.00 $1,840 $230.00 $230.00
:SENIOR EXPERT 8 0 0
1
ir*„As, HOURS 228 0 0 228 228 $30,840 0 114 16 130 130 $14,430 32 230 15 277 277 $33,540
Department
outline and documents fumiture equipment of work Project
Services criteria the Project. the
Management disciplines design purchased purchased and the for for DRAWINGS
design finishes work prepared
Additional other of including ENERGY and owner of owner of disciplines /specifications
activities lists layouts signage /DATA architectural documents RECORD
Facilities manual SOLAR OH/P and coordination coordination TELE OH/P the involved of FOR OH/P
Electrical similar design or-materials W/ Interiors and and W/ between other documentation checking W/
& of of HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE of graphics layout layout HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE HARDSCAPE and and HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule Commissioning Coordination Production Specifications TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SERVICES Preparation including Design Design TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Coordination engineering and Design Review TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Plumbing COMMISSIONING LANDSCAPE Group
Scope .01 02 .03 .01 02 .03 .01 .02 03 04 .05
DLR
Maricopa and Mechanical, A.4.17 DESIGN A.5.13 A.5.14
Fee A.5

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0 0
16022
6/22/2016
# Job Job $75.00 $300 $75.00 $0 $75.00 $1,050
CLERICAL 4 0 14
Date: DLR Owner
:
$100.00 $10,000 $100.00 $19,200 $100.00 $50,200
TECHNICAL 80 io. 100 192 192 502
OIRT $75.00 $0 $75.00 $o $75.00 $900
aLIF,P. 0 0 12
$100.00 $2,000 $100.00 $5,800 $100.00 $17,400
CAPTAIN: 20 20 58 58 174
: : : $136.00 $12,690 $135.00 $4,860 $135.00 $61,290
::PROjECT ENGINEER 40 : 20 16 94 36 36 454
:
$170.00 $5,270 $170.00 $0 $170.00 $26,180
PROJECT:: MANAGER 10 10 31 0 154
25
$0 $0 Page
$230.00 $230.00 $230.00 $1,840
SENIOR EXPERT 0 0 8
1
TASK HOURS 150 50 o 8 0 20 4 2 $ 249 249 $30,260 o 0 286 286 286 $29,860 1274 1274 $105,770
Department
appropriate submittals field to
clarifications Architect's certified drawings
and and other and appropriately
Services of, and and/or record
Management proposers review Samples submitted data built CONSTRUCTION
or Document: receipt, Contractor general direct% as up
Additional Bidders Data submittals information and as
conferences Biddina including Project nocuments Owner, of BIDDING of others marked POST SERVICES
Facilities Reproduction from the opening(s) ADMINISTRATION Drawings, r.nntract to required file FOR OHIP accuracy drawings and Owner contractors FOR OH/P ALL OH/P
Electrical Delivery MATERIALS and pre-bid questions of bid submittals, submittals as master communications W/ DRAWINGS record all W/ W/
& BID in to interpretations at of Ship thF> by of of HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE general Contractor(s) of the to HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule Phased Production Coordination Participation Responses Attendance EVALUATION Processing on action renuirprl Distribution representatives Maintenance Related TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL RECORD of Review the Transmittal identified, Incorporating TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Plumbing PRODUCTION ADDENDA BIDDING or CONSTRUCTION BUILT by Group
Scope .01 .02 .01 .02 .03 BID .01 .02 .03 ,04 AS .02 .03 .04
Demolition DLR
Maricopa and Mechanical, A.6.1 A.6.2 A.6.3 A.6.4 A.6.5 A.8.2.1
Fee 25

$0.00
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00
Job CLERICAL : 10
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL. $100.00
!
$7500
SUPPORT 8
:
jOB CAPTAIN• ::$100.00
'
/ENG. $13500
PROJECT: 36 12 12
ARCH
: .
i :
$170.00
PROJECT MANAGER ' 24 16
26
Page
$230.00
SENIOR DESIGNER
TASK HOURS 62 30 36 4 2 0 6 0 6 6 6 0 6 10 4 4 1 0 0 6 6 6 6
Department
site
the
serving
utilities utilities
Management Services of to facilities
facilities
adequacy connections and
Design (NP) disposal disposal and for extensions and
distribution and treatment systems size extensions
Facilities Plant Photos distribution distribution collection and systems location, requirements utility utility
coordination & coordination DESIGN and and and water collection mechanical systems DESIGN of of off-site site
Central ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes ADMINISTRAIION Meetings minutes service supply drainage sewer waste water plant control illumination for off
County Schedule project Meeting Consultant Drawings Project Meeting Consultant UTILITY Electrical service Water Sanitary Process Storm Central systems Emergency Security Pollution Communications UTILITY Confirmation Determination Planning of Design
Gas Site Fire Site
Engineer PROJECT ON-SITE Group
Scope Programming .01 .02 -03 PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .o4 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .11 .12 .13 .14 OFF-SITE .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06
Measured DLR
Maricopa and A.1.0 A.2.0 A.2.3 A.2.4
Architect
Fee A.1 A.2

$0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $1,050
Job CLERICAL 14
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 60 60 $100.00 $6,000
SUPPORT 16 $75.00 $1,200
$100.00 $2,500
JOB CAPTAIN 15 10 25
/ENG. $135.00 $19,305
PROJECT 20 143
ARCH
•
$170.00 $15,300
PROJECT MANAGER 90
27
. Page
•SENIOR DESIGNER.,:.. 3 $230.00 $690
TASK HOURS 14 20 0 0 29 80 361 351 $46,045 12 1 4 4 2 2 2 2 0
Department
meetings
the and of work project
the the materials community
Management Services inaccuracies, CHECKING and for and
capabilities drawings work prepared explanatory agency
Design capabilities capabilities critical architectural regulations at
for measured conditions PHASE documents graphic behalf
Facilities Plant SURVEYS structural mechanical electrical drawings required field THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the of CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL applicable and Owner's
measurements existing existing existing existing of 'of HOURS HOURS W/ ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination between checking consultations critical written of on
Central FACILITIES Photography of of of of development Do.66mentation BUDGETING $/HR FEE DESIGN Coordination and of Appearances
County Schedule Field Analysis Analysis Analysis Review TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project Meeting Consultant Review Agency Research Preparation
Engineer PRESENTATIONS PROJECT DISCIPLINES Group
Scope EXISTING .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .06 PROJECT SCHEMATIC .01 .02 .03 .01 .02 AGENCY -01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
/
Maricopa and A.2.6 A.2.7 A.2.8 A.3.1 A.3.2 A.3.3
Architect
Fee A.3

6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# # :;
Job Job
Date: DLR Owner CLERICAL
:TECHNICAL 10 12
:::SUPPORT:
:
JOB CAPTAIN•
.
/ENG.
PROJECT ARCH
PROJECT MANAGER 28
Page
SENIOR DESIGNER
TASK HOURS 16 16 18 6 0 0 0 0 18 18 18 18 18 0 14 14 14 14 0 0 0 0 10 10 0
Department
the
and with architectural
volumes systems consistent
Management materials and areas alternative disciplines COST
Services and materials, standard of
systems dimensions, quality suitability other of
Design DOCUMENTATION plans elevations building DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION architectural and and eauioment activities SCHEDULING CONSTRUCTION
Facilities Plant building and of approximate systems requirements DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION distribution alarms system requirements RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS potential criteria availability and similar
SIGN and site sections selection of sketch(s) / source(s) conservation ventilating mechanical systems and and systems communications electrical of their and &cirri of systems of PROBABLY
Central model(s) DESIGN! DESIGN and conditioning protection space service detection space DEVELOPMENT
County Schedule Conceptual Preliminary Preliminary Development Perspective Study Energy Energy Heating Plumbing Fire Special Process General Power Lighting Telephones Fire Security Electronic Special General Identification equipment concentiial Investigation materials. Coordination OF
Engineer STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL Air ELECTRICAL MATERIALS PROJECT STATEMENT Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .06 .06 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .01 .02 .03 DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.3.4 A.3.5 A.3.8 A.3.7 A.3.11 A.312 A.3.13
Fee

$0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER:: 0
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $76.00 $0
Job CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 98 $100.00 $9,800 16 16
: $0
$75.00
,SUppORT 0
:: I
$100.00 $800
CAPTAIN 8
/ENG. $135.00 $6,615
PROJECT 49 20 20
ARCH
:
PROJECT MANAGER" 126 $170.00 $21,420
29
• Page
$0
$230.00
DESIGNER 0
$38,636
TASK HOURS 281 281 10 4 0 9 6 8 B 0 o 38 38 0 0 0 0
Department
meetings
of
work Proiec Project community
the the materials
Management Services CHECKING and the for for and
work prepared explanatory agency
disciplines
Design PHASE architectural documents regulations graphic at behalf DOCUMENTATION
Facilities Plant THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the involved of CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL and Owner's elevations details sketch(s) selections
HOURS HOURS WI ADMINISTRATION coordination between other and checking consultations applicable written of on and construction layouts
Central 6/HR FEE Meetings minutes and of sections dimensional model(s) materials
County Schedule TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT Project Meeting Consultant Coordination enaineerina Review Agency Research Preparation Appearances ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Plans, Typical Three Study Final Equipment
Engineer PRESENTATIONS PROJECT DISCIPLINES Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 ,04 AGENCY .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08
DLR
Maricopa and A.3.14 DESIGN A.4.1 A.4.2 A.4.3 A.4.4
Architect!
Fee A.4

6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022 :
# #
Job Job
Date: DLR Owner CLERICAL
•
TECHNICAL 20
SUPPORT
JOB :CAPTAIN"
:
" /ENG.
PROJECT ARCH
:. :
PROJECT MANAGER 30
: Page
SENIOR DESIGNER
TASK HOURS 0 I 10 10 0 0 o 32 32 32 12 0 0 0 14 12 14 14 0 4 4 4
Department
of their
materials, standards and outline
systems equipment and
Management Services components architectural quality and disciplines criteria COST
components capacities communications major and systems design
Design dimensions structural lists and and of significant criteria other of including CONSTRUCTION
and criteria major clearances materials sizes layouts equipment clearances control measures electrical capacities layouts equipment clearances of their and materials, standards. activities manual lists SCHEDULING
Facilities Plant DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION system design criteria of or DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION equipment equipment for and vibration DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION and equipment for and DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS identification equipment architectural similar design materials
Central structural design sizing coordination specifications space chases and impacts conservation lighting, sizes space chases DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION form quality of of or PROBABLY
structural for and and DEVELOPMENT
County Schedule Basic Final Foundation Preliminary Critical Outline Approximate Preliminary Required Required Acoustical Visual Energy Criteria Approximate Preliminary Required Required brief systems significant criteria Coordination Production Specifications OF
Engineer STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS and PROJECT STATEMENT Group
Scope .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .01 .02 .03 .04 .°5 CIVIL .01 .02 .03 DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.4.5 A.4.6 A.4.7 A.4.8 A.4.9 A.4.11 A.4.12 A.4.13
Fee

$0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER::: 0 6/22/2016
16022
# # Job $75.00 $o
Job CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 148 $100.00 $14,800
: $75.00 $0
!uppoRT 0
$0
$100.00
403 CAPTAIN 0
:
:i
IENG. $135.00 $13,905
PROJECT: 103 10
ARCH
$170.00 $14,960
PROJECT MANAGER 88 31
: $0 Page
SENIOR DESIGNER 0 $230.00
:
TASK HOURS 339 339 $43,665 10 10 8 20 10 8 4 0
Department
of work Project
the Proiect the
Management Services CHECKING and the for for meetings
work prepared agency
Design PHASE architectural disciplines documents at DOCUMENTATION
involved regulations behalf DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION
Facilities Plant THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the of CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL Owner's DOCUMENTATION
HOURS HOURS W/ DRAWINGS inutes coordination between other and checking consultations applicable on DESIGN DESIGN DOCUMENTATION
Central $/HR FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings m and of DESIGN DESIGN
County Schedule TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project Meeting Consultant Coordination enoineerina Review Agency Research Appearances ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN DESIGN
Engineer DISCIPLINES STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL DESIGN LANDSCAPE INTERIOR Group
Scope CONSTRUCTION PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 AGENCY .01 .02 .03 CIVIL DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.5.1 A.5.2 A.5.3 A.5.4 A.5.5 A.5.6 A.5.7 A.5.8 A.5.5 A.5.10
Fee A.5

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER' 0 0
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $1,050 $75,00 $2,100
Job :CLERICAL 14 28
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 220 $100.00 $22,000 526 $100.00 $52,600
suppoNT 24 $75.00 $1,800 40 $75.00 $3,000
$100.00 $10,800 $100.00 $14,100
JOB CAPTAIN 108 141
/ENG: $135.00 $19,710 $135.00 $59,535
PROJECT 146 441
ARCH
,
PROJECT MANAGER 172 $170.00 $29,240 476 $170.00 $80,920
32
Page
$230.00 $460 $230.00 $1,150
SENIOR DESIGNER 2 5
TASK HOURS 2 2 8 0 4 4 4 2 686 686 $85,060 1657 1657 $213,405
Department
Bidding bidding, and the other quality Project. disciplines Contract, Specifications Work. Specifications he of
of of Owner of and the of other the the scope Project
preparation conditions the preparation Specifications workmanship, by of and of and the in the
Management Services and and between and Supplementary, construction Specifications conditions drawings subdivisions Drawings changes for
development place time, Agreement development architectural equipment, the for of Including special alternate special on prices schedules
Design the of (General, of and required Specifications of on of or established PHASE SERVICE
Facilities Plant RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS in Owner describe form(s) in Owner Contract preparation systems criteria development Manual and DOCUMENTS/SCHEDULING coordination prices coordination bids of THIS OH/P THIS OH/P
the which and the the of and materials, the of Project of Documents and or bids and alternate update HOURS HOURS W/ HOURS HOURS W/
Central to forms, to performance obtaining obtaining and $/HR FEE $/HR FEE
County Schedule Assistance Documents bidding Contractor(s) Assistance Conditions Conditions) Development describing and Coordination Compilation Bidding BIDDING Preparation Preparation Wnrk Review TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Engineer MATERIALS for for Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 SPECIAL .01 .02 .03
DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.5.11 A.5.12
Fee

. .$0.00 $0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 :OTHER 0 6/22/2016
16022 "
# # Job $75.:00: $75.00 $0
Job CLERICAL'! 0
Date: DLR Owner ::
$0
TECHNICAL :::$100:00:: 0 $100.00
$75.00 $75.00 $0
SUPPORT:: 0
$0
$100.00 $100.00
JOB CAPTAIN 0
: r
: /ENG. $13500 $135.00 $270
PROJECT : 2
ARCH
,
,: ::::$170:00', $170.00 $340
'PROJECT MANAGER 2 33
r: :: Page
: $23000: $230.00 $230
SENIOR DESIGNER': 1
$840
TASK HOURS 0 0 0 2 2 0 5 5 4 1 2
Department
Management Services
Design (NP) PHASE
Facilities Bridge Photos THIS OH/P
Courts ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination & ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination HOURS HOURS $/HR W/ FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination
BUDGETING DESIGN
County Schedule Project Meeting Consultant Drawings Project Meeting Consultant TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project Meeting Consultant
Engineer PRESENTATIONS PROJECT Group
Scope Programming PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 PROJECT SCHEMATIC .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
Maricopa and A.1.0 Measured A.2.0 A.2.7 A.2.8 A.3.1
Architect!
Fee A.1 A.2 A.3

6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# #
Job Job
CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT,:
JOB :CAPTAIN:
/ENG.::
F.Ro4ECT. ARCH
PROJECT MANAGER
34
Page
:SENIOR DESIGNER
TASK HOURS 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 7 7 3 0 0 10 9 9 9 7
Department
meetings
of work project volumes
the Proiec the materials community materials and
Management Services CHECKING and the for for and and areas
work prepared explanatory agency
Design disciplines regulations at systems dimensions,
architectural documents graphic behalf DOCUMENTATION plans elevations building (DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION
Facilities Bridge COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the involved of applicable and Owner's building and of approximate systems requirements
between other and checking consultations critical written of on and site sections selection of sketch(s) / conservation ventilating mechanical
Courts and of model(s) DESIGN DESIGN source(s) and conditioning protection systems space
County Schedule Coordination enaineerina Review Agency Research Preparation Appearances ARCHITECTURAUDESIGN Conceptual Preliminary Preliminary Development Perspective Study Energy Energy Heating Plumbing Fire Special Process General
Engineer DISCIPLINES STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL Air Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .11 DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.3.2 A.3.3 A.3.4 A.3.5 A.3.6
Fee

$0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER..: 0
16022 : 6/22/2016
# # Job MAK)
Job ,CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner
.!::,
TECHNICAL 37 $100.00 $3,700
$75.00 $0
SUPPORT.' 0
• I •
Mom) $400
:JOB: •.CAPTAIN 4
• •.. .
/ENG. $135.00 $3,375
PROJECT 25
—ARCH
PROJECT MANAGER 52 $170.00 $8,840
35
Page
$0
SENIOR DESIGNER 0 $230.00
TASK HOURS 4 4 4 4 0 0 3 3 0 118 118 $16,315 3 2 0
Department
the
and with architectural
systems consistent
Management Services materials, standard alternative disciplines COST
of
Design architectural quality suitability other of CONSTRUCTION
and and eauioment activities SCHEDULING PHASE
Facilities Bridge DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION distribution alarms communications system requirements potential criteria availability and similar THIS OH/P
Courts and and systems electrical space of their and ripcinn of systems of DEVELOPMENT PROBABLY HOURS HOURS W/ FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination
County Schedule service Power Lighting Telephones detection Security Electronic Special General Identification equipment ronrpntilal Investigation materials. Coordination OF TOTAL STAFF $/iiiR RATE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT Project Meeting Consultant
Engineer ELECTRICAL Fire PROJECT STATEMENT PRESENTATIONS PROJECT Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 , .01 .02 .03 .04 .05
/ DLR
Maricopa and A.3.7 A.3.11 A.3.12 A.3.13 A.3.14 DESIGN A.4.1
Architect
Fee A.4

6/22/2016 30-16120-00 :...OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# # •
Job Job
'CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT:
.
CAPTAIN
: 1ENG.
....:PROJECT :ARCH
.
PROJECT MANAGER.'
36
- Page
SENIOR DESIGNER*:
TASK HOURS 2 2 1 1 0 0 17 25 0 0 4 0 3 3 3 0 0 0
Department
meetings
of
work Proiec Project community
the the materials
Management Services CHECKING and the for for and components
work prepared explanatory agency
Design architectural disciplines at dimensions structural lists
documents regulations graphic behalf DOCUMENTATION materials
Facilities Bridge the involved of and elevations details sketch(s) DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION and criteria criteria major clearances or
COORDINATION/DOCUMENT between other checking CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL applicable written Owner's and selections system design of
and consultations of on construction dimensional layouts design sizing coordination specifications
Courts and of sections model(s) materials structural structural
County Schedule Coordination enaineerina Review Agency Research Preparation Appearances ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Plans, Typical Three Study Final Equipment Basic Final Foundation Preliminary Critical Outline
Engineer DISCIPLINES STRUCTURAL Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 AGENCY .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08
DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.4.2 A.4.3 A.4.4 A.4.5
Fee

6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# #
Job Job
CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT
JOB. CAPTAIN
/ENG.
PROJECT
ARCH
PROJECT MANAGER 37
Page
SENIOR DESIGNER
TASK HOURS 12 8 8 4 0 0 0 4 3 4 4 0 2 2 2
Department
of their
materials, standards and outline
systems equipment and
Management Services components architectural quality and disciplines cntena COST
capacities communications major and systems other design
Design and and of significant criteria of inducing CONSTRUCTION
sizes layouts equipment clearances control measures electrical capacities layouts equipment clearances of their and materials, standards. activities manual lists SCHEDULING
Facilities Bridge DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION equipment equipment for and vibration DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION and equipment for and DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS identification equipment architectural similar design materials
Courts space chases and impacts conservation lighting, sizes space chases DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION form and quality of ot or DEVELOPMENT PROBABLY
County Schedule Approximate Preliminary Required Required Acoustical Visual Energy for Criteria Approximate Preliminary Required Required brief systems significant and criteria Coordination Production Specifications OF
Engineer MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS and PROJECT STATEMENT PRESENTATIONS Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .06 .09 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 CIVIL .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.4.6 A.4.7 A.4.8 A.4.9 A.4.11 A.4.12 A.4.13 A.4.14
Fee

$0.00 s $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75,00 $0
Job CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 42 $100.00 $4,200
$75.00 $0
SUPPORT 0
$100.00 $2,000
JOB CAPTAIN 20
•
. /EHG. $135.00 $4,050
PROJECT 30
ARCH
$170.00 $5,440
PROJECT MANAGER 32 38
. $0 Page
SENIOR 'DESIGNER 0 $230.00
TASK HOURS 124 124 $15,690 2 4 3 4 2 4 2 o
Department
of work Project
Management Services CHECKING the and the for meetings
work prepared agency
Design PHASE architectural • • • documents at DOCUMENTATION
Facilities Bridge THIS OH/P the • • , of regulations behalf DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION
W/ DRAWINGS coordination COORDINATION/DOCUMENT between • -11• checking CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL applicable Owner's DOCUMENTATION
Courts HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes and consultations of on DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN
County Schedule TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project Meeting Consultant Coordination •• Review Agency Research Appearances ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN
Scope Engineer CONSTRUCTION PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DISCIPUNES .01 .02 .03 .04 AGENCY .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL DESIGN LANDSCAPE INTERIOR Group
CIVIL DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.5.1 A.5.2 A.5.3 A.5.4 A.5.5 A.5.6 A.5.7 A.5.8 A.5.9 A.5.10
Fee A.5

$0.00 , $0 $0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $300 $75.00 $300
Job CLERICAL: 4 4
Date: DLR Owner ::.
:TECHNICAL: 120 $100.00 $12,000 199 $100.00 $19,900
$75.00 $450 $75.00 $450
.:suPpoRT 6 6
$100.00 $5,600 $100.00 $8,000
.CAPTAIN 56 80
.•: •
$135.00 $10,935 $135.00 $18,630
PROJECT. ..ARC)71.1ENG: 81 138
• •
$170.00 $13,090 $170.00 $27,710
PROJECT •MANAGER 77 163
39
. " Page
9230.00 $0 $230.00 $230
...SENIOR .DESIGNER•••••• 0 1
•::: ::::::
TASK HOURS 0 0 2 0 1 1 344 344 $42,375 591 591 $75,220
Department
Bidding bidding, and the other quality Project. disciplines Contract, Specifications Work. Specifications he of
of of Owner of and the of other the the scope Project
preparation conditions the preparation Specifications workmanship, by of and of and the in the
Management Services and and between and Supplementary, construction Specifications conditions drawings subdivisions Drawings changes for
Design development place time, Agreement development architectural equipment, the for of including special alternate special on schedules
the of (General, of and required Specifications DOCUMENTS/SCHEDULING of on of prices or established PHASE SERVICE
Facilities Bridge RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS in Owner describe form(s) in Owner Contract preparation systems criteria development Manual and coordination prices coordination bids of THIS OH/P THIS OH/P
the which and the the of and materials, the of Project of Documents and or bids and alternate update HOURS HOURS W/ HOURS HOURS W/
Courts to forms, to performance and $/HR FEE $/HR FEE
County Schedule Assistance Documents bidding cootractaris) Assistance Conditions rnnr66nns1 Development describing Coordination Compilation Biddina BIDDING Preparation obtaining Preparation obtaining VVnrk Review TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Engineer and for for Group
Scope MATERIALS .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 SPECIAL .01 .02 .03 .04 .05
DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.5.11 A.5.12
Fee

Maricopa County Facilities Management Department Date: 6/22/2016
Project: 225 West Madison DLR Job # 30-16120-00
Schedule Of Values Owner Job # 16022
Phase A, Demolition, Schedule of Values for Invoicing
Percent '% This
Phase Fee Fee Earned Current Fee
Complete Invoice
Programming / Pre Design $ - 0% $ -
Schematic Design $ 96,448 0% $ -
Design Development $ 42,189 0% $ -
Construction Documents $ 71,122 0% $ -
Bidding $ 3,309 0% $ -
Construction Administration $ 35,882 0% $ -
Post Construction $ - 0% $ -
Reimbursable Expenses $ - 0% $ -
Subtotal this Invoice $ 248,950 0% $ - $ - $
Phase B, Building Build-Out, Schedule of Values for Invoicing
Percent % This
Phase Total Fee Fee Earned Current Fee
Complete Invoice
Programming / Pre Design $ 68,330 0% $ -
Schematic Design $ 1,000,751 0% $ -
Design Development $ 1,304,769 0% $ -
Construction Documents $ 2,158,144 0% $ -
Bidding $ 99,846 0% $ -
Construction Administration $ 1,287,232 0% $ -
Post Construction $ 111,130 0% $ -
Reimbursable Expenses $ 15,000 0% $ -
Subtotals $ 6,045,203 0% $ - $ - $ -
Phase C, Central Plant, Schedule of Values for Invoicing
Percent (1/0 This
Phase Fee Fee Earned Current Fee
Complete Invoice
Programming / Pre Design $ 0% $
Schematic Design $ 32,709 0% $
Design Development $ 51,702 0% $ -
Construction Documents $ 88,420 0% $
Bidding $ 4,216 0% $ -
Construction Administration $ 43,858 0% $ -
Post Construction $ - 0% $ -
Reimbursable Expenses $ - 0% $ -
Subtotal this Invoice $ 220,905 0% $ - $ - $ -
DLR Group 1 6/22/2016

EXHIBIT 'B': DP Proposal for Services
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page I 40
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

DLR Group
Alrillieoun, Engineering Planning Inirsiors
6225 N. 24th Street, Suite 250
Phoenix, AZ 85016
602/381-8580
June 21, 2016
Paul Shamrock
Office of Procurement Services
Maricopa County
320 W. Lincoln Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Re: Design services scope of work and fee proposal for 225 West Madison Adaptive Reuse project
DLR Group Project # 30-16120-00
Dear Paul,
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal for design and construction administration services for
the 225 West Madison Adaptive Reuse project. DLR Group has taken the information obtained in the Feasibility
Study, meetings and proposed contract and worked closely with our team and consultants in developing the
following services scope of work and fees for your consideration.
Project Location: 225 West Madison Street Phoenix, Arizona 85003.
Project General Scope: Project scope is to provide design and construction administration services including
programming, site work, schematic design, design development, construction documents, and construction
administration and other services as further defined. There will be an early released Demolition bid package for
building selective demolition.
Project Budget: The project hard construction budget is $60,000,000.00 for all site and building construction
excluding contingencies, professional fees and fixed equipment plus $4,000,000 for demolition of portions of
the existing interior building areas.
Project Schedule: The project preliminary schedule is generally as follows:
4 months for Programming/Schematic Design and surveys
3 months for Design Development
4 months for Contract Documents
6 months for demolition construction work
3-4 months for plan review and bidding
12 months for building construction work
Project Delivery Method: The project is to be delivered in a design bid build process.
Scope of Work and Fee Proposal Approach: We have assembled the project scope and fees in five portions
for your consideration.
A. Basic Services
B. Additional Services Required
C. Additional Services Consultants
D. Additional Services West Courts Central Plant
E. Reimbursable Expense Allowance

Paul Shamrock
Page 2
June 21, 2016
Basic Services
Basic Services Scope of Work Summary: DLR Group proposes to provide the basic services for
Architectural, Structural, Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical and on site Civil engineering design and basic
construction administration for the project.
Construction bid Phase services will be administered by Maricopa County Procurement Department and FMD.
Procedurally all communications during the bid phase will be directly with the procurement department which
will field questions and contract FMD where appropriate. FMD will endeavor to provide answers directly to
procurement and where necessary contact DLR Group for either clarification or any additional information
needed.
Additional Services
Scope of Work for Additional Services: We propose to furnish the following additional services as described
below.
3.1.1.1 Programming / Pre-Design: FMD will develop a detailed architectural space programming with
adjacency requirements, Departmental requirements, detailed room sizes for all spaces, specific special
requirements of each space and a general operations explanation. The FMD provided program will utilize
Maricopa County space standards. DLR Group will meet with FMD to develop the conceptual design in the pre-
Design phase through workshop process to determine the most appropriate design to meet the needs of the
FMD prepared program.
3.1.3 Measured Drawings: Not provided:
3.1.4.1 Site Survey: Consulting survey services will be contracted with Atherton Engineering per proposal
dated May 16, 2016 to provide a survey for the facility site, encompassing the areas of construction. Survey
will include finish floor elevations of buildings and underground services, utilities, manholes and inverts.
3.1.4.5 Structural Analysis Model: DLR Group will develop a Baseline Model for the existing building in
structural analysis software from original building drawings to establish baseline for gravity and lateral force
distribution. This will not address design adequacy of existing members and structure, this will be only used to
identify original building force distribution.
The Baseline Model will be duplicated and adjusted for "proposed" alterations for sole purpose of tracking load
redistribution and identifying components which exceed the code prescribed force increase allowance of 5%
for gravity members and 10% for lateral members. Members and connections above this threshold will require
strengthening which in turn, will be designed and detailed under the basic service structural fee
3.1.7.5 Civil Drainage Report: Not Provided.
3.1.4.2 Geotechnical Soils Report: Not Provided.
3.1.6 Building Information Modeling (BIM): DLR Group will be utilizing Revit for the preparation of the
construction documents for a portion of the project work and utilizing AutoCAD for other portions of the project
work. DLR Group will not be responsible to provide or for the development of or the maintenance of a Building
Information Model (BIM). In the event the General Contractor desires to utilize the DLR Group prepared Revit
Model to further develop into a BIM for their sole use the General Contractor and DLR Group will negotiate an
agreement for the use of the Revit model.
6 DLR Group
AMIN:,lure Engineering Planning Interims

Paul Shamrock
Page 3
June 21, 2016
3.1.7.1 Central Plant Design: Design services for the Central Plant modifications including all architectural,
structural, mechanical and electrical will be provided by DLR Group as follows.
Chiller Design Scope:
DLR Group recommendation is for NRG to add another 1100 ton plate & frame heat exchanger and connect it
to the 12" central cooling chilled water supply/return lines they already have serving the Courts Complex.
Having an additional heat exchanger of equal capacity would give some degree of redundancy in case one of
the primary pumps fail or an issue occurs with one of the heat exchangers or heat exchanger controls. It
would also give the Courts Complex a total of 2200 tons of cooling if needed on peak days in the summer.
Central plant pumping would remain primary secondary pumping as each NRG plate & frame heat exchanger
would have a primary pump and the three secondary pumps would remain in existing configuration. All of the
existing chillers would be removed and all building cooling would be reliant on the NRG/Northwind central
cooling system for building cooling needs.
Cooling Tower Design Scope:
As part of the reuse, remodel and reprogramming of the 225 W Madison site, the elimination of these cooling
towers has been proposed as a way to reroute on site inmate transfer bus traffic and eliminate an existing
roadway in order to turn it into a pedestrian access to the first floor retail / commercial space. DLR is
proposing to remove these cooling towers connected to 3475 ton chiller plant located in the Courts complex.
The elimination of the cooling towers will be part of the 225 W Madison remodel project and the
decommissioning of the 3475 ton chiller plant and full connection of chiller plant to the NRG/Northwind central
chilled water cooling system will be part of a separate project by the county. Removal of the existing cooling
towers is feasible once the Courts Complex chilled water plant is fully connected to the NRG/Northwind
downtown central chilled water system.
Boiler System Design Scope:
(Each boiler design option will have a different fee structure as the construction cost and engineering design
effort differs greatly. DLR Group has included design fees to cover option number 1. If other options are
decided upon additional scope and fees will be required.)
1. De-rate and recertify the existing steam boilers for a lower capacity, allowing the boilers to operate more
efficiently at low fire rates.
2. Remove and replace the boilers with one or two smaller, correctly sized steam boilers.
3. Convert the steam boilers to hot water.
4. Separate the heating and hot water systems, using hot water boilers dedicated to each system.
3.1.8.1 Landscape / Hardscape Design: Landscape and Irrigation system design services for the expansion
project area primarily in the Madison Pedestrian Mall will be provided by DLR Group.
3.1.8.2 Courts Bridge Design: Design services for the Bridge connection to the courts building including all
architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical will be provided by DLR Group.
3.1.9 Interiors Design & Finishes: DLR Group architects will provide interior design of materials, color
selections and graphics for the buildings and site to meet the County requirements.
3.1.11.1 Detailed Cost Estimating: Consulting estimating services provided by the Owner through the on call
services process. The contracted estimator is to provide detailed construction cost estimating at the following
Phases of Design: Programming concept design, Schematic Design, Design Development and 50%
Construction Documents with a final update for bid documents. Additional consultation of recommending cost
savings and costing proposed options will be provided.
3.1.12 On -site Part Time Project Representation: DLR Group will provide an onsite project representative to
provide assistance to Maricopa County FMD construction managers and the General Contractor in support of
construction administration. The duration of on-site representation will be for 12 months. The project
representative will be on site an average of 2 days per week while performing these services. The Owner
through the General Contractor will provide an office space to work out of when needed.
DLR Group
ikrtialedure Engineering Planning Interims

Paul Shamrock
Page 4
June 21, 2016
3.1.14.1 Start-Up Assistance: Not Provided
3.1.15 As -Constructed Record Drawings: As-constructed record drawings will be provided by DLR group by
utilizing the "As-designed Drawings and incorporating all as built conditions marked and noted by the General
Contractor. DLR group will monitor the general Contractors progress of indicating as built conditions in the field
as the as built record set. Final documents are to be turned over to the Owner in Revit and Auto cad format with
two copies on compact disk media and one full size hard copy.
3.1.16 Post Occupancy Evaluation (Warrantee Review): Not provided
3.1.17.0 Acoustical Design: Not provided, but listed as an allowance if it is determined services are needed
at a later date. Consulting design services from MCH per proposal will be provided for acoustical design to
provide the following services thru SD, DD, CD and CA phases: Work to understand the acoustical implications
and speech privacy expectations of both closed and open office plan environments. Establish a minimum of
normal speech privacy for all open and private offices and conferences rooms while presume confidential
privacy for about 25% of the private offices and conference rooms. Establish design criteria and evaluate
acoustical separation between spaces. Evaluate building shell design based on measurement results from
noise environment study. Review acoustical surface treatments. Review room relationships for stacking and
adjacencies with respect to space usage and noise sources. Assist in planning for noise and vibration control
for mechanical equip.
3.1.17.1 Audio Visual Design: Not provided but listed as an allowance if it is determined services are
needed at a later date. Maricopa County staff will provide all detailed information, data and Specifications for
both voice data distribution with minimal audio visual requirements primarily in conference rooms. Facilities
Management has concluded that these services are available from either Facilities (FMD) or the Office of
Enterprise Technology (OET), The County's technical teams, in conjunction with the County's vendors
contracted for security electronics, and data/AV, will provide DLR Group with technical specifications and
marked-up plan backgrounds for the needed devices, cabling and other components of these systems. The
information obtained from the County will be complete to provide Construction documents including the
Project Manual, Specifications details and other Bidding/Contract documents to achieve competitive bids from
general contractors.
The Fairbourn professional services proposals dated May 9, 2016 will be kept as an optional service for the
County to authorize an added, selected service, or services, if, as the design and documenting proceeds,
there is discovered some limited need assistance.
3.1.18 Signage: DLR Group architects will provide signage design of materials and color selections and
graphics for the buildings and site to meet the Maricopa County FMD Standards for way finding and delineation
of spaces. Signage will conform to State ADA requirements and security requirements.
3.1.20 Telecommunications (I.T.) /Data Distribution Design: Not provided but listed as an allowance if it is
determined services are needed at a later date. Maricopa County staff will provide all detailed information,
data and Specifications for both Voice Data Distribution with Audio Visual, and the Security Electronics,
Facilities Management has concluded that these services are available from either Facilities (FMD) or the
Office of Enterprise Technology (OET), The County's technical teams, in conjunction with the County's
vendors contracted for security electronics, and data/AV, will provide DLR Group with technical specifications
and marked-up plan backgrounds for the needed devices, cabling and other components of these
systems. The information obtained from the County will be complete to provide Construction documents
including the Project Manual, Specifications details and other Bidding/Contract documents to achieve
competitive bids from general contractors.
The Fairbourn professional services proposals dated May 9, 2016 will be kept as an optional service for the
County to authorize an added, selected service, or services, if, as the design and documenting proceeds,
there is discovered some limited need assistance.
DLR Group
Alchiledure Engineering Planning !Merit-Ks

Paul Shamrock
Page 5
June 21, 2016
3.1.21.1 Security Electronics Design: Not provided but listed as an allowance if it is determined services are
needed at a later date. Maricopa County staff will provide all detailed information, data and Specifications for
both Voice Data Distribution with Audio Visual, and the Security Electronics, Facilities Management has
concluded that these services are available from either Facilities (FMD) or the Office of Enterprise Technology
(OET), The County's technical teams, in conjunction with the County's vendors contracted for security
electronics, and data/AV, will provide DLR Group with technical specifications and marked-up plan
backgrounds for the needed devices, cabling and other components of these systems. The information
obtained from the County will be complete to provide Construction documents including the Project Manual,
Specifications details and other Bidding/Contract documents to achieve competitive bids from general
contractors.
The Fairbourn professional services proposals dated April 27, 2016 will be kept as an optional service for the
County to authorize an added, selected service, or services, if, as the design and documenting proceeds,
there is discovered some limited need assistance.
3.1.21.3 Elevator Analysis & Design: Consulting design services will be provided by SYSKA per proposal
dated June 15 2016. Scope of services will be to provide SD, DD, and CD bid assistance and CA for the
elevator systems.
3.1.24.1 Life Cycle Energy Analysis: Not provided.
3.1.24.2 LEED Design & Documentation: Not provided.
3.1.24.3 Commissioning HVAC Systems: DLR Group will provide commissioning services of all energy
using HVAC, equipment. Equipment functional performance testing shall demonstrate that the installation and
operation of components, systems, and system-to-system interfacing relationships are in accordance with
approved plans and specifications such that operation, function, and maintenance serviceability for each of
the commissioned systems is confirmed.
Testing shall include all modes and sequence of operation, including under full-load, part-load and the
following conditions.
1. All modes as described in the sequence of operation
2. Redundant or automatic back-up mode
3. Performance of alarms
4. Mode of operation upon a loss of power and restoration of power
HVAC controls systems shall be tested to document that control devices, components, equipment, and
systems are calibrated adjusted and operate in accordance with approved plans and specifications.
Sequences of operation shall be functionally tested to document that they operate in accordance with
approved plans and specifications. Air economizers shall undergo a functional test to determine that they
operate in accordance with manufacturer's specifications.
Commissioning Authorities shall advise maintenance staff on operational and environmental issues, prepare
pre-commissioning verification checklists and contractor reports, participate in construction meetings and
coordinate construction phase commissioning activities as required, oversee the functional testing of installed
components, and assist in post occupancy training and monitoring activities.
DLR Group
Arch'leclure Enginffring Planning Interim

Paul Shamrock
Page 6
June 21, 2016
3.1.25 Demolition Package/ Phased Delivery: DLR Group will provide phased design services to issue an
early demolition design package of plans and specifications for the demolition of primarily interior walls,
structural slabs beams and spandrel panels, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and incidental building
components to facilitate the construction schedule and design. It is prescribed that the programming and
concept design is progressed to a point to confirm the level of demolition required and structural analysis to
produce this demolition package. There will be additional more specific detailed demolition required of the
construction package once CDs are completed and specific installations are detailed.
Prior to this demolition occurring Maricopa County will update all Environmental hazardous materials reports.
Maricopa County will issue a separate environmental hazardous materials abatement package based on the
updated environmental studies conducted by the County. Contractors performing this abatement work and
associated inspections and special inspections needs to be selected by FMD and assigned to the demolition
package Contractor to facilitate the phased coordination of abatement and demolition work.
Based on a recommended approach to demolish the mezzanines and mezzanine beams as part of the
demolition package Structural design would need to accommodate the preparation of the structural repairs
and reinforcement. When the mezzanine slabs and beams are demolished, it is anticipated that the columns
will require reinforcement due to lack of column ties. The repair should occur immediately after the
demolition, to provide the required level of safety. Additional reinforcement may be required to the
spandrel panels and the mezzanine and the overall lateral stability of the building, for the mezzanine beams
were a part of the vertical lateral resisting system. This structural scope includes preparation of the
structural notes, demolitions plans, framing plans, details, specifications and structural calculations. Also,
management of the documents during bidding and construction, addendums, RFIs and shop drawings, at the
same time continuing with the design process.
3.1.27 Equipment M.P. & E. Coordination: DLR Group will provide design services to include fixed and
movable equipment for the facility. DLR group will provide coordination with the County preferred vendor for
movable equipment for inclusion into the building design. DLR Group will coordinate with the users and FMD
for the information technologies for audio visual equipment.
3.1.28 Fire Protection System (Sprinkler) Design: Consulting design services will be provided by Tricord
Engineering LLC to provide fire sprinkler design for the existing building design services for including the water
testing, fire pump, emergency power requirements and sizing and routing of all major distribution to allow the
contractor to provide the detailed "deferred submittal" fire protection (fire sprinklers) design drawings and
specifications. Services are per Tricord Engineering proposal dated May 27, 2016
3.1.28.1 Firefighters Air Replenish System (FARS) Design: Not provided but listed as an allowance if it is
determined services are needed at a later date. Rescue Air Systems Inc. will provide design services for a
'deferred' submittal firefighter air replenish system if required by the AHJ. This has been required for high-rise
buildings within the City of Phoenix Fire Department as the first responders.
3.1.29.1 Smoke Management Systems Design; Smoke Management System design is not provided but listed
as an allowance if it is determined service are needed at a later date. In the event that during the design and
Code study that the AHJ requires a smoke management system or other additional life safety/fire/smoke,
modeling/studies etc. for the design and or a variance request, these additional services will be brought to the
attention of the Owner.
3.1.29.2 Code Life Safety Consulting: Willdan will provide consulting code services for fire/life safety code
analysis and report. The report will address applicable codes, egress analysis, fire rated separations, structural
fire resistance, occupant load factors, smoke zone descriptions, active and passive smoke control systems,
sequence of operations, emergency power requirements, testing and maintenance overview. Included is fire
protection, smoke management and firefighter's air replenish system requirements analysis. Services are per
Willdan proposal dated May 23, 2016.
DLR Group
Architect. Engineering Flaming Intetims

Paul Shamrock
Page 7
June 21, 2016
3.1.30 3D Renderings / Computer Generated Models: Not provided.
3.1.31.1 Special Inspections: Willdan will provide Special Inspections required by Chapter 17 of the 2012 IBC,
as adopted by the jurisdiction and as further defined in Willdan proposal dated May 23, 2016.
3.1.31.3 Special Forensic Inspections Allowance: Not provided but listed as an allowance if it is determined
services are needed at a later date. Willdan will provide special forensic inspections for Structural design
associated with the structural assessment and analysis and codes or regulations will be provided and billed
toward an allowance fee to cover such unknown inspections.
3.1.31.4 3D Scanning Building: Consulting design services from Eco3D to provide laser scan of interior,
exterior and roof top to document and measure all exposed structural and architectural elements. Eco3D will
incorporate all scanned elements into a 3D Revit model to be used for construction documents. Services are
per Eco3D proposal dated May 17, 2016.
3.1.32 Construction Materials and Soils Testing: All services for construction materials testing and soils
testing are not included in this contract and are to be provided by the Maricopa County. Including existing
materials testing and verification of existing concrete strength and existing reinforcing scanning.
3.1.33 Carbon Fiber Design: DLR Group will provide design services to include carbon fiber as a possible
design solution for the structure where strengthening of existing connections are required. If the design were
to utilize CFRM in some capacity scope would be performance specified with delegated design. DLR Group will
coordinate with manufacture/vendor to provide Design Assist support in order to develop the performance
specification as well as assist with preliminary design.
Services Compensation:
We propose to furnish the above basic services and additional services per the attached fee schedule and the
back-up information provided to establish a Lump Sum Fee.
Additional Consulting Services Allowance: Some consulting services have been discussed as potentially
being needed to facilitate the design and construction process. These consulting services have been identified
and listed in the consulting allowance services consultant fee summary as a maximum not to exceed fee for
the scope identified. Fees, scope and DLR Group management cost for these services are not included in this
contract at this time. In the event FMD determines at FMDs discretion that these services or other services are
needed FMD and DLR Group will exercise the option to negotiate the scope and fees associated as an add
service to this agreement. (Not to exceed fees for these allowances identified are listed in the fee proposal
under consultant's fee summary)
Project Reimbursable Expenses Allowance: Reimbursable expenses have been estimated for each phase
of design and construction for DLR group and Consultants based on current unit cost. The expense allowance
summary costs are indicated in the attached fee schedule. All progress submittals, final documents, permit
review and Bid Documents etc. will be on electronic format pdf files only with no printing or any hard copies
required at any phase of deliverables. DLR group will bill the Owner for expenses encored by DLR Group and
the Consultants.
DLR Group
Architecture Engineering Planning Interiors

Paul Shamrock
Page 8
June 21, 2016
Additional Provisions: Applicable jurisdiction regulations, standards and codes that will apply to this project
are as follows. The Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) will be the State Fire Marshall as agreed to by Maricopa
County and the City of Phoenix.
1. The project is located within the incorporated area of the City of Phoenix, Arizona however the property
and building is owned by Maricopa County and thus will follow the Maricopa County adopted codes.
On August 7, 2013 the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors voted to adopt the following codes with
AZBO/MAG amendments:
a. 2012 Editions of
i. International Building Code (IBC),
ii. International Mechanical Code (IMC)
iii. International Plumbing Code (IPC)
iv. International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
v. International Green Construction Code (Optional)
vi. International Energy Conservation Code (IEC) ( Optional)
vii. International Existing Building Code (IEBC)
b. 2011 National Electric Code (NEC)
Sub-Consultants: DLR Group is an integrated design firm with architects, engineers and specialty services
provided "in-house" for all architectural services, interiors, structural engineering, mechanical engineering,
plumbing engineering, electrical engineering, landscape design and sustainable design services.
Our consulting sub-consultants retained for this project are as follows:
Code Analysis, Special Inspections and Structural Forensics. 602-870-7600, www.willdan.com
Willdan Engineering,
1440 East Missouri Ave, Suite Cl
Phoenix AZ 85014
Consulting Structural (existing building design). 602-265-4331, www.avschwan.com
A.V. Schwan and Associates Inc.
6000 E Thomas Rd # 1
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Civil Engineering Earthwork, Grading and Drainage, Paving and Survey, 602-279-7331,
Atherton Engineering Inc.
1203 East Meadowbrook Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85014
Elevator Design Consulting, 310- 254-3762, www.svska.com
SYSKA
11500 West Olympic Blvd., Suite 680
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Building Laser 3D Scanning, 480.510.1049, www.eco3dusa.com
Eco3D,
5013 East Washington St. # 170
Phoenix Az. 85034
Fire Protection Design, 520-990-4541, www.tricordenci.com
Tricord Engineering LLC
7556 S Daystar Ct
Tucson AZ, 85747
6 DLR Group
Architecture Engineering Planning Interims

Paul Shamrock
Page 9
June 21, 2016
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service and we look forward to working for Maricopa County and Maricopa
County, Facilities Management Department.
Sincerely
DLR GROUP
Larry J. Smith, AIA
Architect / Principal
End: FMD Schedule of Values, FMD fee summary, Consultant fee summary, DLR Group hourly
breakdown and Consultants proposals.
Cc: Dave Boehm, AIA
DLR Group
Arthiledwe Engintwring Planning Interiols

Maricopa County Facilities Management Department Date: 6/22/2016
Project: 225 West Madison DLR Job # 30-16120-00
Schedule Of Values Owner Job # 16022
Phase A, Demolition, Schedule of Values for Invoicing
Percent % This
Phase Fee Fee Earned Current Fee
Complete Invoice
Programming / Pre Design $ - 0% $
Schematic Design $ 96,448 0% $ -
Design Development $ 42,189 0% $ -
Construction Documents $ 71,122 0% $ -
Bidding $ 3,309 0% $ -
Construction Administration $ 35,882 0% $
Post Construction - 0%
Reimbursable Expenses $ - 0% $ -
Subtotal this Invoice $ 248,950 0% $ - $ - $ -
Phase B, Building Build-Out, Schedule of Values for Invoicing
Percent "A This
Phase Total Fee Fee Earned Current Fee
Complete Invoice
Programming / Pre Design $ 68,330 0% $ -
Schematic Design $ 1,000,751 0% $ -
Design Development $ 1,304,769 0%, $ -
Construction Documents $ 2,158,144 0% $ -
Bidding $ 99,846 0% $ -
Construction Administration $ 1,287,232 0% $ -
Post Construction $ 111,130 0% $ -
Reimbursable Expenses $ 15,000 0% _ $
Subtotals $ 6,045,203 0% $ - $ - $ -
Phase C, Central Plant, Schedule of Values for Invoicing
Percent % This
Phase Fee Fee Earned Current Fee
Complete Invoice
Programming / Pre Design $ - 0% $ - '
Schematic Design $ 32,709 0% $
Design Development $ 51,702 0% $ -
Construction Documents $ 88,420 0% $ -
Bidding $ 4,216 0% $ -
Construction Administration $ 43,858 0% $
Post Construction $ - 0% $ -
Reimbursable Expenses $ - 0% $ -
Subtotal this Invoice $ 220,905 0% $ - $ - $ -
DLR Group 6/22/2016

as 6/22/2016
- - 6,454 - - 3,832 - - 3,232 - - 500 - - 6,896 - - 500 21,414
Tricord Fire Protect up
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ roll
which
30-16120-00 - 69,950 - - - - - - - - - - - 4,000 73,950
6/22/2016 Eco3d Scanning
16022 effort
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
of
- - 15,500 - - 18,320 - - 24,400 - - 2,704 - - 18,800 - - 7,000 86,724
SYSKA Elevator scope
# $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
per
# Job
Job H - H H 46,640 1,000 47;640 and
Willdan SSI
Date: DLR Owner rate work.
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
per NRG
- - - - - - - - - - 2,998 - - 500
Willdan Code $10,450 $15,500 $15,500 $44,948 hours
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Plant
S - 404 1,125 404 1,575 1,125 1,480 5,775 4,125 135 525 375 267 1,050 750 - 2,000 Rates, Central
Atherton Civil $48,075 $69,190
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Hourly is
C
14,530 4,478 253,067 15,792 7,172 405,249 25,288 11,953 675,416 42,147 545 30,778 1,921 6,113 345,403 21,554 60,700 - of Phase
MP&E $1,922,106 2
breakdown and
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
3,570 5,754 3,158 9,213 5,058 15,356 8,429 700 8,906 384 7,853 99,943 4,311 11,900 - Build-Out efforts.
Structure 203,202 117,260 195,433 700,429
DLR discipline's
these
Department $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
building of
50,230 15,862 464,004 12,634 25,400 743,033 20,231 42,334 33,718 1,929 56,433 1,537 21,649 765,502 17,243 38,530 - or each
Architecture 1,238,388 3,548,667 firm's main
of
a is
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ by B
Management specifics
up
Services TOTAL 68,330 96,448 32,709 42,189 51,702 71,122 88,420 3,309 99,846 4,216 35,882 43,858 111,130 15,000 Phase
1,000,751 1,304,769 2,158,144 1,287,232 6,515,058 backed the
work,
Phase
Madison Sum $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ be indicate
Facilities firm/discipline
shall Demolition to
Lump Constr. Exp.
West Phase Scope Pre-Design SD SD SD DD DD DD CD CD CD Bid Bid Bid CA CA CA TOTAL costs split
for Reimb. that is is
County Post for A
225 Hours phase effort
ID: Summary fg 2 a. 1B 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 7B 8B totals Phase CA
All
Total 1 2 3 Group
Maricopa Project Effort 1.0% 1.5% 15.4% 0.5% 0.6% 20.0% 0.8% 1.1% 33.1% 1.4% 0.1% 1.5% 0.1% 0.6% 19.8% 0.7% 1.7% 0.2% 100%
Fee Notes: DLR
%

6/22/2016
2,690 10,500 7,500 46,500 79,724 20,914 44,448 46,640 69,950 328,866 - - 76,216 84,722 64,199 32,200 67,300 8,050 _
6122/2016 30-16120-00 Total Total -
1116022 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
# Job Job - - - - - - - - - - 9,941 11,051 8,374 4,200 - 1,050 -
DLR FEE DLR FEE
Date: OUR Owner $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
500 500 1,000 7,000 500 500 1,000 4,000 15,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 3,000 1,000
Expense Allowance Expense Allowance
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ , $ $ $ $ $ $
2,690 10,500 7,500 46,500 79,724 20,914 44,448 46,640 69,950 328,866 - - 66,275 73,671 55,825 28,000 67,300 7,000 -
Sub Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Sub Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
- - - - •
P.C. P.O.
$ $ $ $
267 1,050 750 18,800 6,896 2,998 46,640 77,401 15,975 14,226 8,665 3
C.A. C.A.
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Phase 135 525 375 2,704 500 4,239 Phase - 4,638 3,740
B.N B.N
Department Service $ $ $ $ $ $ Service $ $ $ $
C.D. 1,480 5,775 4,125 24,400 3,232 15,500 54,512 C.D. - 21,475 27,350 18,600 28,000 22,700
Design Design
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Management D.D. 404 1,575 1,125 18,320 3,832 15,500 40,756 D.D. - 16,700 20,118 17,260 14,800 7,000
, $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
S.D. 404 1,575 1,125 46,500 15,500 6,454 10,450 69,950 151,958 S.D. - 12,125 7,339 7,560 29,800
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Facilities
Fee 12 FEE Inc.
Inc.
Project Sum Plant Chapter SUM Hoover System Inc. Design
County Summary Out Group System Systems Systems
Madison Lump Demo Engineering Build Engineering Central Engineering Engineering Scanning LUMP Allowance Owner) Conant Consulting Rep. Systems Management Design
Fee In Survey Design Hennessy Engineering Inspections IN by IT AV Elect. Air Forensics Allowance
Maricopa West Design Design Design Protection Study Built Est. Visual in Mckay A.V. Air Group Fiber
Consultant Service Consultant Atherton Atherton Atherton Site Atherton Elevator SYSKA Tricord Code VVilidan Special VVilldan As 3d SERVICES Service Consultant Cost (Provided Audio Included Acoustics MCH, & Fairborn Security Fairborn Firefighters Rescue Smoke Sturc. VVilldan, Carbon MR Group
225 Civil Civil Civil Civil Fire 3D Eco I.T. DLR
2.4 2.4 2.4 4.2 21.3 28.0 29.2 31.1 31.4 TOTAL 11.1 17.0 17.1 20.0 21.1 28.1 29.1 31.3 33.0 DLR

- 6/22/2016
Not Used
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 11/12/1943
$
1950 3973 6299 47 2756 15025
# # Job Engineering HRS
Job DLR
Date: DLR Owner A7.5
$0 $0 ' $0 $0
FEE $275,360 $533,105 $817,950 $7,990 $385,920 2,020,325 item
Engineering in
DLR
Additions
$
3522 4980 8777 399 4808 22486 A7.10.
HRS
Summary Architect DLR A.7.9,
A6.3 in 4
Scope Page
$0 $0 $61,120 $0 $0 owner and reductions
and FEE $444,240 $629,700 $1,091,720 $581,465 2,808,245
Fee Architect to A6.1
Department DLR item hrs.
Summary $ assistance hrs 131
$0 $0 $0 $0 A4.4 114
$719,600 $1,162,805 $1,909,670 $69,110 $967,385 4,828,570 and doc reduced
Services SERVICE TOTAL bid reduced
A4.2 A5.11 overall
Management Basic $ item overall
in item Engineer
5/31/16 hrs. in
Engineering 60 hrs Engineer and
dated 73
Facilities increased and
and reduced Architect
proposal Architect
Project SERVICES
County Architectural SERVICES from Architect Architect services
Madison ANALYSIS SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL phase Group
DISCRIPTION PREDESIGN SUBTOTAL changes phase phase phase
Maricopa West Group SITE S.D. D.D. C.D. BIDDING C.A. P.C. of DD CD Bidding CA DLR
225 DLR Notes 1 2 3 4
A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.6 A.7 A.8 A.9

$75
ENG. SUPPORT
30-16120-00 $100 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 ENG. TECH
16022
$100
ENG. JC
#
# Job
Job ENG. PE $136 12
Date: DLR Owner
, $170
ENG. PM 20
ENG. SENIOR $230
$75
ARCH. SUPPORT 40 88
ARCH. TECH $100 320 240 180
ARCH. JC $100 80 40 300 200 200
.
ARCH. PA $135 40 40 80• . 80 20 350 180 100
5
ARCH. PM $170 100 .20 40 20 85 12 •220 80 40 Page
•
ARCH. SENIOR $230 12 0
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 32 o o o o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 o o 0 o
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 148 60 80 0 0 160 120 201 0 34 4 0 0 0 o 1210 700 500 0 0 0 0 o
of' , meetings 1
of
work project volumes
the Proiect the execution invoices, matedais community materials and
Management CHECKING and the for and and areas
work for prepared certifications, explanatory and
disclelines processing process. regulations agency systems dimensions,
architectural documents for out graphic at DOCUMENTATION plans elevations
involved requirements, close behalf building DOCUMENTATION
Facilities the of consultants applicable and building and of approximate
Services coordination COORDINATION/DOCUMENT between other checking contract CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL written Owners and sections selection sketch(s) /
and of insurance consultations critical of on site of
SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes and and of model(s) DESIGN
County Schedule A/E Meeting Consultant Coordination engineering RevieW Management contracts, payments Agency Research Preparation Appearances ARCHITECTURALJDESIGN Conceptual Preliminary Preliminary Development Perspective
Project Study Group
Basic SERVICES DISCIPLINES STRUCTURAL
Scope PREDESIGN PROJECT •01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .o4 AGENCY -01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .08 01 . .02 .03 .04 .03 -06 .07 .08 DLR
Maricopa and Group S.D. A.3.1 A.3.2 A.3.3 A.3.4 p1/4.3.s
Fee DLR A.1 A.3

SUPPORT
, ' .
6/22/2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 "TECH 10 8 16 a 16 24
16022
•
•
.,•ENG... ,-..JC' 10 10 10 10 10 is • 24 24
#
# Job
Job .
ENG. PE 16 16 24 8 is 16 24 16
Date: DLR Owner .
l
.ENG... '.1,91/1 24 24 16 24 is
•
ENG..
SENIOR
1
•
ARCH. SUPPORT
ARCH...: TECH
ARCH..
JC
ARCH...,
PA
6
.
Page
ARCH. 20
..11ZPM
ARCH.
'SENIOR
ENG. TASK HOURS 2 6 50 60 60 42 0 0 58 0 0 40 64 40 BB 40 40 32 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 80 0 0 0
the
with architectural 1
and
systems consistent
Management alternative
disciplines
materials, standard of
quality suitability other
of
architectural
and and ectUloment.
DOCUMENTATION activities
Facilities systems distribution criteria
requirements alarms system requirements RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS potential availability and
communications systems work systems their similar
Services / ventilating and and systems of deslan of systems of
source(s) conservation mechanical systems space systems electrical space utilities and
DESIGN and conditioning protection service detection utility protection
County Schedule iVE Telephones Electronic eneral Drainage identification equipment conceptual inveatigation materials, Coordination
Energy Energy Heating Plumbing Special Process General Power Lighting Security special On-site Off-site Fire Paving Group
Air Fire Fire G
Basic MECHANICAL
MATERIALS
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .11 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .01 .02 .03 .04 .06 .06 .07 .01 .02 .53 .N .05 DLR
Group
Maricopa and A.3.6 A.3,7 A,3.8 km/
Fee DLR

$75 $225
ENG. SUPPORT 3
• $100 $9,200 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH 92
16022 .
ENG, JC 324 $100 $32,400
# '
# Job
Job PE 805 $135 $108,675 12
Date: DLR Owner
ENG. PM 702 $170 $119,340 12
ENG.. SENIOR 24 $230 $5,520
$75E. '
SUPPORT: 128 $9,600 60 40
•• • • •
ARCH. :TECH 720 $100 $72,000
-ARCH.. JC 820 $100 $82,000 90 45
.
ARCH. PA 1064 $135 $143,640 40 40 60 20
7
ARCH 745 $170 $126,650 110 40 20 46 Page
ARCH. SENIOR 45 $230 $10,350 • 12 4
ENG. TASK HOURS 1950 1950 $275,360 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 24 0 0 0 o o o o
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 61 81 13 3522 3522 $444,240 182 60 80 0 0 190 125 110 0 38 4 o 0 0 o
, 1 meetings
of of
work Protect Project execution Invoices, materials community
Management the the
COST CHECKING and the for for and and
work prepared certifications, explanatory agency
disciplines processing process.
CONSTRUCTION PHASE architectural documents for out regulations graphic at behalf
SCHEDULING Involved requirements, close
Facilities THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the of consultants and Owner's
Services PROBABLY W/ coordination between other checking contract applicable written
DEVELOPMENT HOURS HOURS FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes and of Insurance and consultations of of on
County Schedule A/E OF $/HR Consultant Coordination eerino and Management contracts, payments Research Preparation Appearances
PRESENTATIONS TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project Meeting enoin Review Agency Group
Basic PROJECT STATEMENT SERVICES DISCIPLINES
Scope PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .01 .02 03 . .04 .05 .06 DLR
Maricopa and Group .3.12 A.3.13 A.3.14 D.D. A.4.1 A.4.2 A.4.3
A
Fee DLR A.4

ENG. SUPPORT
6/22./2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH
16022
" • • . :
ENG. JC 80 240 20 100 180 74 240 240
• .
# • ,
# Job '
Job ENG. PE 260 140 10 20 100 20: 160 160 .160'
Date: DLR Owner . -
'
• .
-
ENG. PM 140 40 40 64 .170. 110 160 160 106
'
'
ENG. SENIOR .24 24
.
I
H.
ARC 40
'SUPPORT
,
..
ARCH. TECH 480 360 220
' .. . '
•• .
..
ARCH. JC 420 300 200 15
' .
• • .
ARCH. .480 360 300 12
- .
• •• 8
' • •
- , Page
ARCH. PM". 360 1120 100
'
•, -
:,•
ARCH. SENIOR •• 36
..
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 480 420 0 0 58 87 0 0 60 370 490 184 0 0 72 0 0 584 584 550 0 0 0 0
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 1816 1140 820 0 12 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0
'
systems
Management compenents
components communications
capacities major
lists of
dimensions structural and and
DOCUMENTATION materials sizes layouts clearances control measures capacities layouts clearances
Facilities elevations and criteria major clearances equipment electrical equipment
details sketch(s) DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION criteria or DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION DESIGN/D.00UMENTATION and
selections system design of equipment equipment for and vibration equipment for and
Services and construction layouts design sizing coordination specifications chases conservation lighting, sizes chases
dimensional space and space DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION
sections model(s) materials structural structural impacts for
County Schedule A/E ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Equipment Foundation Preliminary Approximate Preliminary Required Required Acoustical Approximate Preliminary Required Required
Plans. Typical Three Study Final Basic Final Critical Outline Visual Energy Criteria Group
Basic STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 -06 .07 .08 .01 .02 •03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 CIVIL DLR
Group
Maricopa and AAA A.4.5 A.4.6 A.4.7 A.4.8
Fee DLR

$75 $226
ENG. SUPPORT 3
$100 $0 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH 0
16022.
ENG.. JC 1454 $100 $145,400
# . • '
# Job
Job ENG. • :PE 1232 $135 $166,320
Date: IDLR Owner .
$170 • .
1236 $210,120 16
ENG. SENIOR $230 $11,040
_
$75,
ARCH., SUPPORili 140 510,5001 22
$100
ARCH..i TECH 1060 $106,000
'
• $100 .
ARCH: 1080 $108,000 90
• . •
ARCH.: 60 1640 $135 $221,400 40 100 . 60 20
: ' 9
. $170 . • Page
40 40. 1000 $170,000 110 20 20 38
. ' . .
ARCH. •SENIOR. 60 $230 $13,800 12
•
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 0 0 0 3973 3973 6533,105 0 o 0 o o 0 0 16 0 o o o 0 o
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 130 100 0 0 62 82 14 4980 4980 6629,700 182 60 BO o o 190 120 84 0 38 4 0 0 0
lists of their 1 ; ; 1
itemized materials, standard's and outline of Project of .
or equipment and work the Prolect. the execution invoices,
Management architectural quality disciplines criteria COST CHECKING and the for and meetings
Specifications and and design work for prepared certifications,
criteria systems other disclotes processing process. agency
outline significant of including CONSTRUCTION PHASE architectural documents out at
of their materials, activities lists SCHEDULING involved for requirements, close regulations behalf
Facilities RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS architectural and standards. manual materials THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the of consultants CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL Owner's
Services identification equipment architectural quality similar design or PROBABLY W/ coordination between other and checking of insurance contract consultations applicable on
of form of Si DEVELOPMENT HOURS HOURS 6/HR FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes and and of
County Schedule ME Development brief and systems significant and Coordination Production Specifications OF TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project Meeting Consultant Coordination enoineerino Review Management contracts, payments Agency Research Appearances
and criteria PRESENTATIONS Group
Basic MATERIALS PROJECT STATEMENT SERVICES PROJECT DISCIPLINES AGENCY
Scope .0.1 .02 .03 .04 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
Maricopa and Group A.4.11 A.4.12 A.4.13 A.4.14 C.D. A.5.1 A.5.2 A.5.3
Fee DLR A.5

$75 $225
ENG. SUPPORT 3
' $100 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH I685-71 720 1405 $140,500
16022
•I ' $100
ENG.' .JC 210 640' 1274 $127,400
# # I .
Job Job $135
ENG. PE 720 1859 $250,965
Date: .DLR Owner • .
' ENG. PM 690 1758 $170 $298,860 10 ' ' 20
..
0 $230 $D
ENG. SENIOR
'
$76
ARCH. SUPPORT 120 202 $15,150
ARCH. TECH 23067 2300 $100 $230,000
-771—
$100
ARCH. JC 2130 $213,000
T-2000
ARCH. PA 1900 2180 $135 $294,300
10
ARCH. PM 1000 20 40 450 1878 $170 $319,260 SO Page
I
ARCH. 'SENIOR 40 1 87 $230 $20,010 4
I I
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 2095 2720 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6299 6299 $811,950 10 0 20 0 0
1 I I
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 7360 0 0 0 30 45 458 84 42 0 0 8777 8777 $1,091,720 79 62 52 0 0 154
Bidding the , quality Project. Contract,
of of the, of other the other
conditions between and Specifications workmanship, of by the of
Management preparation preparation
and and Agreement and Supplementary, construction Specifications conditions
place architectural equipment, the
development time, of development for of including
DOCUMENTATION the form(s) (General of and required Specifications, PHASE
Facilities DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION in and in preparation systems development Manual
RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS Owner describe forms, Owner Contract criteria and THIS OH/P
Services DOCUMENTATION the which nnntrartor(1 the the and materials, the of Project of Documents HOURS HOURS WI Review
DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN to bidding and to of performance $/HR FEE
County Schedule AIE ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Assistance Documents bidding, Owner Assistance Conditions Conditions) Development describing Coordination disciplines Compilation Bidding TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SERVICES MATERIALS Coordination Reproduction Completeness
DESIGN and Group
Basic STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL MATERIALS ADDENDA
Scope CIVIL .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 BIDDING .01 .02 .03 .°4 .05 DLR
Maricopa and Group A.5.4 A.5. 5 6 A.5, A.5.1 A.5.5 A.5.11 BIDDING A.6.1 A.6.2
Fee DLR A.6

$75
ENG. SUPPORT D
$100 $0 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH 0
16022 ,
$100 $0 .
ENG. JC 0
#
# Job .
Job 0 $135 120 120
Date: DLR Owner ,:.ENG.
$170 $7,990 .
ENG. 47 100 120 120
$230 $0
ENG.: SENIOR 0
$75
ARCH. 0 10 240 220 200 120
SUPPORT
$100 $800
ARCH. TECH 8 80
ARCH. 42 6100 $4,200 120
'ARCH. PA 126 $135 $17,010 . 6 40 320 40 45
11
$170 , ,
ARCH.. PM 203 $34,510 20 60 10 96 Page
.
.
ARCH SENIOR „1 20 $230 $4,600 9
. ' :
$7,990
ENG. TASK HOURS 0 16 o 0 o 1 0 0 0 47 47 0 0 20 180 0 0 320 0 320 0 36 0
$61,120
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 2 30 2 0 o 14 2 2 0 0 399 399 268 20 20 60 40 0 500 390 270 298 269 0
a , and ,
as Architect's of
and Samples
and Project Ownersupplied Owner-supplied of, execution invoices,
Management Documents the Data fmnumentg and/Or
proposers for review and
Bidding for for Project Contractor certifications,
or furnished receipt, Cnntract processing process.
Bidders the Contract(s) installation Installation Drawings, submittals
conferences of of BIDDING COORDINATION data criteria ADMINISTRATION Including the Owner, for out
from proposals of data and and by to required of requirements, close
Facilities Interpretations openIng(s) ALTERNATES/SUBSTITUTIONS award FOR OH/P Owner Ship ilred as file consultants
pre-bid questions or on coordination the establishing obtaining delivery delivery furnishings. submittals, on rani submittals master contract
Services In or bid Bids HOURS HOURS WI DATA of of of action of of communications of insurance
to at of 6/HR FEE and in in and of submittals representatives and
County Schedule A/E Participation Responses clarifications Attendance OF Evaluation Recommendation TOTAL STAFF TOTAL Review responsibility Assistance Assistance Coordination eouloment Coordination furniture CONSTRUCTION Processing appropriate Distribution Maintenance Related Management contracts, payments
EVALUATION RATE other field Group
Basic SERVICES OWNER-SUPPLIED
Scope BIDDING .01 .02 " .04 .05 ANALYSIS BID .01 .02 .03 .04 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 OFFICE .01 .02 " .04 .06 .06 DLR
Group 1
Maricopa and A.6.3 A.6.4 A.6.5 C.A. A.7. A.7.2
Fee DLR A.7

ENG. SUPPORT
6/22/2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH
16022
•
ENG. JC 00 80 •40 40 40
#
# Job
Job
ENG. PE so 40 40
Date: DLR Owner '
ENG. PM BO 40 40
1.
ENG. SENIOR
ARCH. SUPPORT '40
• • .'
ARCH. TECH .200 80 80
- . .
•
ARCH. JC 280 100 240
. •
ARCH. PA .100 20 320 . 100. 160 20 80
. . ' 12
•
ARCH. PM 10 40 60 40 10 20 20 16 4 12 Page
.
ARCH. SENIOR 2 1
ENG. TASK HOURS o 0 24 0 0 240 240 0 120 0 120 0 0 120 o o o 0 0 o
.
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 0 2 2 40 80 100 30 842 300 260 60 10 12 460 21 0 o 50 16 48 . 12 0
of to ' to : of i . Costs . the , I
the with Work. to relative modified for to and Contract
by frequency Work and time of the
required behalf of agencies notifications the In supplemental response behalf or reasonableness in relative notifications the of by order
Management and frequency. Drawings deleted Modifications certification
status and in Owner's changes behalf modified. account submitted change
testing Owner's of inspection and deficiencies of revisions of added, for Work and
field procedures on tests interpretations the materials to Owner's or approvals, the on data under
agencies and and distribution Contractorfs1 on ORDERS distribution be to Contractor(s) relative on deleted appropriate in Payment
of inspection procedures observed schedule and payments expense
standards, testing testing Inspections and and Instructions and Work added, of changes for performed
Facilities OBSERVATION coordination inspection. by of by and from labor Contractor(s) communications, to MONITORING ACCOUNTING of thereof. of
scope, and and standards, on describe of recommendations be to preparation ConstrucUon records Applications work
Services and inspections testing and compliance Contractor(s) DOCUMENTS reproduction Specifications clarification Owner's requirements REQUESTS/CHANGE reproduction to proposals costs Completion with relative changes evaluation for
FIELD COORDINATION Documents for Inspection testing scope, reports and proposed the for of COST of of
and of and for of and In SCHEDULE all and
County Schedule A/E Administration Recommending Arranging Notifying requiring Evaluating required Preparation, Drawings, Forwarding changed Preparation, Specifications quantities Substantial Negotiations Work Assisting Contract(s) Coordination recordkeeping Maintenance and Evaluation Review Contractor(s) arrangements.
Contract testing Review Owner renuests Review Review Sum Group
Basic CONSTRUCTION SUPPLEMENTAL of CONSTRUCTION
INSPECTION QUOTATION PROJECT
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .01 .02 .03 .04 DLR
Group
Maricopa and A.7.3 A.7.5 A.1.6 A.73 A.7.8 A.7.9
Fee ALR

$75 $0 $75 $675
ENG. SUPPORT 0 9
$100 $0 $100 6/22/2016
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 ENG. TECH 0 1497 $149,700
16022
'
JC 40 720 $100 $72,000 3772 $100 $377,200
#
# Job Job • ' $135 $135
ENG. PE 40 40 40 920 $124,200 4816 $650,160
Date: DLR Owner •
• ;
$170 $170
-ENG. PM 40 40 40 1116 $189,720 4859 $826,030
•
.ENG. SENIOR 0 $230 $0 72 $230 $16,560
$75; $75
ARCH. SUPPORT; 80 910 $68,2501 1380 $103,500
; ;;-.
•ARCH. TECH 440 $100 $44,000 4528 $100 $452,800
ARCH. JO 760 $100 $76,000 4832 $100 $483,200
1.
$135 $135
ARCH, PA 100, 40 1923 $259,605 6933 $935,955
13
.• PM .54 12 ' 12 12 4 744 $170 $126,480 4570 $170 $776,900 Page
ARCH -
ARCH. :SENIOR 31 $230 $7,130 243 $230 $55,890
ENG. TASK HOURS 120 40 0 0 80 BO 80 0 0 0 2756 2756 $385,920 15025 15025 $2,020,325
Department ARCH. TASK HOURS 234 12 12 8 52 4 16 5 3 2 4808 4808 $581,465 22486 22486 $2,808,245
the or , completion to final i Is In I releases liens the to
representative veriN any, of Work found final against any,
to completed final if making the verify receipts, If
Management Owner's Documents be until sureties, the Completion that deficiencies to Owner sureties, ADMIN.
the to Items withheld or or age of representative affidavits, the or
with Contract of be surety retain Substantial Contractor(s) acceptance Indemnifying surety Payment
Ust) the to of of the Contractor(s) warranties, of for CONSRUCT. SERVICE
Facilities Punch to Contractor(s) amounts consent release of by and any if Owner's of bonds consent
( Work of notice Inspection and the work or of oavmegt(s) Certificate(s) FOR OH/P THIS OHM
Services inspection the of the by the of receipt partial Certificate(s) upon Owner Inspection(s), with the transmittal fen receipt W/ W/
and or In of final to Inspection of and of and final final of HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule A/E CLOSEOUT detailed conformity submitted corrected. Determination Securing reduction payment(s) insurance Inspection(s) for Notification follow-up completion Review waivers Securing of making Issuance TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
A for list ready Final and Group
Basic PROJECT
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 10 • DLR
Maricopa and Group A.7.10
Fee DLR

104 228 130 277 148 829 249 286 2250
Hrs
MPE DLR
6/22/2016
FEE 14,530 - 30,840 14,430 33,540 18,805 106,703 30,260 - 29,860 278,968
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 MPE DLR
16022 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
28 776 106 148 166 273 112 1608
Hrs
Struct. DLR
# FEE 3,570 129,200 12,420 18,805 21,341 38,875 - 11,900 236,111
# Job Job Struct. f.
DLR
Date: DLR Owner $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
18,128 129,976 30,840 - - 14,430 46,066 37,758 128,209 69,408 - 41,872 516,686
Engineers TOTALS
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
298 110 1366 248 149 557 296 663 842 1010 192 5730
Summary Hrs
Architect DLR 14
Scope Page
and FEE 50,230 - 16,600 149,095 28,390 19,390 66,360 37,610 85,362 107,175 132,200 21,930 714,342
Fee Architect DLR
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ formulas)
Department 50,230 - 16,600 149,095 28,390 19,390 66,360 37,610 85,362 107,175 132,200 21,930 714,342 coordination delivery in
ARCH. TOTAL (error
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ programming design phased design
equipment
68,358 129,976 47,440 149,095 28,390 33,820 112,426 75,368 213,571 176,583 132,200 63,802 1,231,028 interiors Plant
, Management SERVICE TOTAL detailed 27.0 demolition
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5/31/16: A.1 9.0 A.5, A.5, 25 Central
Summary item item A.6, in
dated in item in hrs
Facilities Design Rep. Drawings hours in hours item 74
Services, Delivery proposal hrs in hrs added
Model Finishes Project Record 156 164 156
Project SERVICES Coordination Hardscape Design Design 47
County Programming SERVICES Analysis SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES Phased Time from reduced reduced reduced added Engineer
Additional Design / Bridge Plant SERVICES Part SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL Group
Madison DISCRIPTION PREDES1GN Detailed ANALYSIS SPECIAL Structural ENERGY Commissioning DESIGN Interiors Signage Equipment Landscape Courts Central BIDDING Demolition Site As-Constructed SUBTOTAL changes Architect Architect Architect Architect Architect DLR
Maricopa West Group C.A. On P.C. of
1.1 4.5 24.3 9.0 18.0 27.0 8.1 8.2 7.2 25.0 12.0 15.0 Notes 1 2 3 5
225 DLR A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.6 A.7 A.8 A.9

$0.00
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# # Job $75.00
Job CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL $100.00
SUPPORT $75.00
, 1
JOB CAPTAIN $100.00
PROJECT ARCHITECT $135.00 14
PROJECT. MANAGER $170.00 14 16 12 —10 15
Page
IIONY $230.00
SENIOR DESIGNER 14
Department
TASK HOURS 42 4 12 0 15 21 17 0 9 4 0 0 0 14 28 8 18 5 0 0 0
Management personnel
criteria of patterns
and responsibilities systems Evaluation Familiarization DIAGRAMS flow SCHEDULING
Facilities limitations material functions equipment
Services coordination functional expandability and Occupancy FLOW and allocations operating and expandability
ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes PHASE objectives, requirements relations and and equipment requirements Building:facilities, F Functions vehicular space of facilities handiing and DEVELOPMENT BUDGETING
County Schedule Additional Programming Project Meeting Consultant Design Space Space Number Flexibility Special Site Post Lures Other CONCEPTUAL Internal Human, General Analysis Adjacency Special Materials Flexibility PRESENTATIONS
PROJECT PROGRAMMING PROJECT PROJECT Group
Scope 01 • ,02 .03 .04 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 SPACE .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09
Detailed DLR
Maricopa and Architectural A.1.0 A.1.1 A.1.2 A.1.3 A.1.4 A.1.6
Fee 1.1

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0
6/2212016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0 0 6/22/2016
#16022
# Job Job $75.00 $0 $75.00 $4,050 $75.00 $0
CLERICAL- 0 22 16 16 54 0
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 0 $100.00 388 98 77 563 $100.00 $56,300 BO 40 120 $100.00 $12,000
supRoRT 0 $75.00 $0 80 19 8 107 $75.00 $8,025 8 16 $75.00 $1,200
..1013:;-! CAPTAIN 0 $100.00 $0 156 85 59 300 $100,00 $30,000 .. 18 12 30 $100.00 $3,000
.
$135.00 $9,990 $135.00 $28,620 ' : $135.00 $8,750
PROJECT ARCHITECT 74 118 56 38 212 16 12 . 10 12 50
PROJECT 188 $170.00 $31,960 76 38 16 130 $170.00 $22,100 16 . 10 4 32 $170.00 $5,440 16
MANAGER' Page
$0 $0
SENIOR: 36 $230.00 $8,280 0 $230.00 0 $230.00
DESIGNER
Department ".
TASK HOURS 298 298 $50,230 840 312 214 1366 1366 $149,095 26 126 20 76 o 248 248 $28,390
contract
Management design graphics purchased with sign'age
finishes owner furniture DESIGN layouts: for SIGNAGE1
PHASE and including of signage specifications
Facilities THIS OH/P FINISHES layouts specifications coordination purchased INTERIOR OH/P Interior package INTERIOR OH/P
Services W/ Interiors and owner W/ and and user signage W/
HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE AND of and layout of HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE Exterior documents with for HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule Additional TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SERVICES DESIGN Preparation documents Design furniture Coordination vendor TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SIGNAGE Prepare Design Meetings CDs Final TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Scope INTERIOR .01 .02 .03 , INTERIOR .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 Group
SPECIAL DLR
Maricopa and Architectural A.3.10 A.4.10
Fee A.3

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0 0 6/22/2016
16022
# Job # Job $75.00 $75.00 $150 $75.00 $1,500
CLERICAL 0 2 20 20
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 0 $100.00 $0 40 40 $100.00 $4,000 220 220 $100.00 $22,000
$75.00 $0 $75.00 $450 $75.00 $750
SUPPORT 0 6 6 10 10
JOB CAPTAIN 0 $100.00 $0 15 15 $100.00 $1,500 20 80 12 112 $100.00 $11,200
• _
PROJECT ARCHITECT 60 $135.00 $8,100 20 12 38 $135.00 $5,130 20 ao 16 76 $135.00 $10,260
PROJECT MANAGER 50 $170.00 $8,500 32 8 48 $170.00 $8,160 0 60 32 112 $170.00 $19,040 17
Page
SENIOR $230.00 $0 $230.00 $0 $230.00 $1,610
DESIGNER 0 0 4 7
Department
TASK HOURS 110 0 110 110 $16,600 115 20 14 149 149 $19,390 61 432 64 557 557 $66,360
the for the
Management i document furniture and disciplines ' for
and coordinate COORDINATION work prepared
layouts collect architectural involved LANDSCAPE
COMMISSIONING COORDINATION equip to other documentation/specifications documents
Facilities OH/P and review vendor EQUIP OH/P the and of FOR OH/P
Services services W/ furniture to user equip County W/ between checking W/
HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE EQUIPMENT with and with HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE HARDSCAPE engineering and and HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
County Schedule Additional Commissioning TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Preliminary Meetings furniture Meetings package TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Coordination of work Project. Design Review Project TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
COMMISSIONING LANDSCAPE the Group
Scope .01 .02 , INTERIORS .01 .02 03 . .01 .02 .03
DLR
Maricopa and Architectural A.4.17 A.6.13 A.6.14
Fee

$0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 6/22/2016
16022
# #
Job Job 20 16 36 $75.00 $2,700
CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 0 $100.00
SUPPORT '50 80 130 $75.00 $9,750
'
JOB CAPTAIN 64 68 $100.00 $6,800
• ... $135.00 $59,535
PROJECT ARCHITECT 76 36 14 so 20 8 216 441
'
PROJECT ' 20 30: 10 100 167 $170.00 $28,390 18
MANAGER • - • Page
$0
SENIOR 0 $230.00
DESIGNER
Department
TASK HOURS 210 66 10 o 0 4 16 0 0 60 20 28 412 842 842 $107,175
MONTHS
and 7 TO of, Data, Contract and/or
Management , proposers 6 OF review Project the
or Bidding receipt, by Contractor required
Bidders the DURATION Drawings, required Owner, as submittals DEMOLITION
conferences of including Ship to of
Facilities Reproduction from interpretations opening(s) on submittals representatives file FOR OH/P
Services Delivery PACKAGE Documents Review pre-bid questions bid ADMINISTRATION submittals, action other submittals master communications W/
of and in or at of and of field of HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE
BID to appropriate
County Schedule Additional Phased Production Coordination Completeness Participation Responses clarifications Documents Attendance EVALUATION Processing Samples Dorumpnte Distribution Architect's Maintenance Related TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
and
DEMOLITION ADDENDA BIDDING • CONSTRUCTION Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 BID .01 .02 -03 .04
Demolition DLR
Maricopa and Architectural A.6.1 A.6.2 A.6.3 A.6.4 A.6.6
Fee 25

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
6/2212016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0 0 6/22/2016
#16022 •
# Job Job $75.00 $7,600 $75.00 $0 $75.00 $15,900
CLERICAL 100 100 0 212
Date: DLR Owner
• $0
TECHNICAL 0 $100.00 100 100 $100.00 $10,000 1043 $100.00 $104,300
SUPPORT 20 • 20 $75.00 $1,500 0 $75.00 $0 289 $75.00 $21,675
JOB- CAPTAIN 0 $100.00 $0 42 42 $100.00 $4,200 567 $100.00 $56,700
.
820 820 $135.00 $110,700 22 $135.00 $2,970 1793 $135.00 $242,055
PROJECT. 'ARCHITECT
_
PROJECT .60 60 $170.00 $10,200 28 28 $170.00 $4,760 815 $170.00 $138,550 19
MANAGER Page
SENIOR 10 10 $230.00 $2,300 0 $230.00 $0 53 $230.00 $12,190
DESIGNER
Department
TASK HOURS 0 1010 0 0 1010 1010 $132,200 0 0 0 192 0 192 192 $21,930 4772 4772 $458,980
on d
Management ADMIN. I contictor(s) them bit initial concealed submitted data, as others record DRAWINGS ,
the of as-built
from certified from location Information general and up
CONSRUCT. obtaining Drawings construction the and Owner marked RECORD SERVICES
Rep. Representative(s) Representative(s) for on of Contractoi1s1 drawings the to
Facilities Services FOR OH/P DRAWINGS Record during and accuracy identified, contractors FOR OH/P ALL OH/P
Project REPRESENTATION Project Project HOURS HOURS W/ FEE arrangements parties made Documents general tlythe to record of all HOURS HOURS W/ FEE HOURS HOURS W/ FEE
$/HR of certified $/HR $/HR
County Schedule Additional Time Full-time Part-Time TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL RECORD Making other changes Contract Review Transmittal appropriately iricorporefing TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
and all and
Part BUILT Group
Scope PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 AS .01 .02 .03 .04 .05
Site DLR
Maricopa and Architectural On A.7.4 A.8.2.1
Fee 12

$0.00 $0.00 $0
6/2212016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $75.00
Job CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner
$0
TECHNICAL $100.00 0 $100.00
_,$75.00 $75.00 $0
SUPPORT 0
$100,00 $100.00 $600
JOB CAPTAIN 2 6
$135.00 $135.00 $2,970
PROJECT ENGINEER 4 22
.
$170.00 $170.00
PROJECT MANAGER 0 20
$0 Page
, $230.00 $230.00
SENIOR EXPERT 0
TASK HOURS 6 2 0 0 D 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 $3,570
Department
1
Management personnel
criteria of
and responsibilities PHASE
Facilities limitations expandability systems and THIS OH/P MODEL
Services ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination objectives, requirements relations functional and and equipment requirements HOURS HOURS $/HR W/ FEE ANALYSIS
BUDGETING
County Schedule Programming Project Meeting Consultant PROGRAMMING Design Space Space Number Flexibility Special Site PRESENTATIONS TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SERVICES
Additional STRUCTURAL Group
Scope PROJECT .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 PROJECT DLR
Maricopa and Detailed A.1.0 A.1.1 A.1.5 A.1.6 SPECIAL A.3.5
Fee Structural 1.1 A.3

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $o
20-00 OTHER 0 0
6/2212016 61 16022
30-1 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $300 $75.00 $0
Job CLERICAL 4 0
Date: DLR Owner
$0
$100.00 $1,000 $100.00
TECHNICAL 10 0
$75.00 $0 $75.00 $0
SUPPORT 0 0
' $100.00 $1,800 , ' $100.00 $6,800
JOB CAPTAIN 18 • 40 20 68
$135.00 $10,260 $136.00 $3,240
PROJECT ENGINEER 76 . 16 4 24 82 24' 15'
•
H
$170.00 $107,100 $170.00 $2,380
PROJECT MANAGER 630 6 14 22 16
21
Page
$0
$230.00 $8,740 $230.00
SENIOR EXPERT 38 0
TASK HOURS 776 776 $129,200 16 60 30 0 o 106 106 $12,420 104 41 31 0 o 0 6 0 0 0
Department _
clarifications
of Project
work Project and
the the the for
Management and for DRAWINGS proposers
work prepared or Document:
disciplines specifications Bidders
PHASE architectural documents RECORD conferences Biddino
the Involved / of Reproduction from opening(s)
Facilities THIS OH/P other documentation FOR OH/P Delivery MATERIALS Review pre-bid questions the of
Services HOURS HOURS W/ HARDSCAPE between and checking HOURS HOURS W/ and in to bid at
$/HR FEE and and $/HR FEE BID interpretations
County Schedule TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Coordination engineering Design Review TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Phased Production Coordination Completeness Participation Responses Attendance EVALUATION
Additional LANDSCAPE PRODUCTION ADDENDA BIDDING or Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 Ilion -01 .02 .03 .04 .05 •°1 .02 -03 .04 .05 BID
DLR
Maricopa and A.6.14 Demo A.6.1 A.6.2 A.6.3 A.6.4
Structural 25
Fee

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
6122/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0 0
16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $300 $75.00 $0 $75,00 $600
Job CLERICAL 4 0 8
Date: DLR Owner
$100.00 $0 $100.00 $6,400 $100.00 $7,400
TECHNICAL 0 64 • 74
SUPPORT $75.00 $150 $75.00 $0 $78.00 $150
2 0 2
$100.00 $500 $100.00 $2,800 $100.00 $12,500
JOB CAPTAIN 5 28 28 125
.
$135.00 $25,515 $135.00 $2,700 $135.00 $44,685
PROJECT ENGINEER 40 189 20 331
j
$170.00 $12,410 $170.00 $170.00 $121,890
PROJECT ,..MANAGER 16 73 0 717
22
• $0 $0 Page
$230.00 $230.00 $230.00 $8,740
.SENIOR EXPERTS 0 0 38
.
TASK HOURS 56 8 8 12 273 273 $38,875 0 0 0 112 0 112 112 $11,900 1295 1295 $179,225
Department
field during oil to
appropriate submittals other made location certified
and other Architects and changes the on and appropriately recerd..drawings
of, and and/or I and
Management review Samples contractor(s) all on construction., submitted data, DRAWINGS
receipt, Contractor from them Documents general directet marked,up.as-bullt
Data, submittals by during information and as
including Project ilorumantc Owner, of BIDDING obtaining certified Contract of andotheis RECORD SERVICES
Facilities ADMINISTRATION Drawings, Dontrart to submittals required file FOR °HIP DRAWINGS for Drawings initial the installed as accuracy drawings Owner contractors FOR OH/P ALL OH/P
Services submittals, of Ship the of as master of communications HOURS HOURS W/ FEE arrangements from systems general Contractor(s) record of the to all HOURS HOURS W/ FEE HOURS HOURS W/ FEE
on by representatives $/HR RECORD Record of Incorporating $/HR $/HR
County Schedule Processing action winked Distribution Maintenance Related TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Making parties construction concealed Review the Transmittal Identified, TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Additional CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BUILT by Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 AS .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
Maricopa and Structural A.6.5 P.C.
Fee A.8

$0.00 $0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0
16022 6/22/2016
# Job 4 $75.00 $75.00 $0
Job CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner
$100.00 $100.00 $0
TECHNICAL 0
$75.00 $75.00 $0
SUPPORT 0
i $100.00 $100.00 $1,200
JOB CAPTAIN 12
$135.00 $135.00 $8,910
PROJECT ENGINEER 66
$170.00 $170.00 $4,420
PROJECT MANAGER 26 23
$0 Page
$230.00 $230.00
SENIOR EXPERT 0
TASK HOURS 14 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 4 8 4 104 104 $14,530
Department
the
Services and 1
Management personnel inaccuracies,
Additional criteria of capabilities capabilifies capabilities critical drawings
and responsibilities systems for measured SCHEDULING PHASE
Facilities Electrical limitations expandability and SURVEYS structural mechanical electrical drawings required THIS OH/P
& ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination objectives, requirements relations functional and and equipment requirements FACILITIES measurements existing of existing of existing of existing of of DEVELOPMENT BUDGETING HOURS HOURS $/HR W/ FEE
County Schedule Plumbing Programming Project Meeting Consultant PROGRAMMING Design Space Space Number Flexibility Special Site Photography Field Analysis Analysis Analysis Heview development PRESENTATIONS TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
• EXISTING PROJECT PROJECT Group
Scope PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 DLR
Maricopa and Mechanical, Detailed A.1.0 A.1.1 A.1.3 A.1.4 A.1.5 A.1.6
Fee 1.1

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
30-16120-00 OTHER 0 0 0
6/22/2016
116022 6/22/2016
# Job ' $75.00 $0 $75.00 $0 $75.00 $750
Job CLERICAL 0 0 10 10
Date: DLR Owner
•
. $100.00 $3,000 . $100.00 $6,000 $100.00 $12,000
TECHNICAL • • 30. 30 6o . 60 120 • 120
. .
$75.00 $0 . $75.00 $750 $75.00 $0
SUPPORT . 16. . 10 0
I • i $100.00 $3,000 .! $100.00 $2,000 • $100.00 $2,000
jOB CAPTAIN: 30 30 20 20 20 • 20
•
S
$135.00 $16,200 $135.00 $4,320 $135.00 $10,800
PROJECT ENGINEER 120 120 12 32 20 60 80
$170.00 $6,800 $170.00 $1,360 $170.00 $7,990
PROJECT MANAGER 40 40 4 8 12 20 15 47
24
• Page
$0 $0
$230.00 $1,840 $230.00 $230.00
SENIOR EXPERT 8 0 0
•
TASK HOURS 228 0 0 228 228 $30,840 0 114 16 130 130 $14,430 32 230 15 0 0 277 277 $33,540
Department
outline documents equipment of Project
Services and , purchasedIfumiture work the Project. the
Management disciplines critena design purchased and the for for DRAWINGS
design finishes work prepared
Additional other ENERGY and owner owner disciplines specifications
of including of of /DATA architectural documents RECORD
activities manual lists COORDINATION layouts signage coordination coordination the involved /
Facilities Electrical similar matedals SOLAR OH/P Interiors and TELE OH/P other documentation of FOR OH/P
of design or HOURS HOURS W/ of graphics and and HOURS HOURS WI HARDSCAPE between and checking HOURS HOURS FEE W/
& of $/HR FEE EQUIPMENT layout layout $/HR FEE and and $/HR
County Schedule Commissioning 'Coordination Production Specifications TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL SERVICES Preparation including Design Design TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Coordination engineering Design Review TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Plumbing COMMISSIONING LANDSCAPE Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 INTERIORS .01 .02 -03 .01 -02 .03 .04 .05
DLR
Maricopa and Mechanical, A.4.17 DESIGN A.5.13 A.6.14
Fee A.5

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER. 0 0 0 -
116022 6/22/2016
# Job Job $75.00 $300 $75.00 $0 $75.00 $1,050
"CLERICAL 4 0 14
Date: DLR Owner
, $100.00 $10,000 '. $100.00 $19,200 $100.00 $50,200
TECHNICAL 80 20 100 192 192 502
875.00 $0 $75.00 $0 $75.00 $900
SUPPORT 0 0 12
$100.00 $2,000 ' $100.00 $5,800 $100.00 $17,400
CAPTAIN 20 20 BB • 58 174
$135.00 $12,690 $135.00 $4,860 $135.00 $61,290
PROJECT ENGINEER 40 20 16 94 36 36 464
: . $170.00 $5,270 $170.00 $0 $170.00 $26,180
PROJECT MANAGER 10 10' " 31 0 154
25
. $0 $0 Page
$230.00 $230.00 $230.00 Km
SENIOR EXPERT. 0 0 8
TASK HOURS 150 50 o 8 0 20 4 2 8 249 249 $30,260 0 o 286 286 286 $29,860 1274 1274 $105,770
Department
appropriate submittals field to
clarifications Architect's certified drawings
and and of, other and appropriately •
Services and and/or record
Management proposers review Samples submitted data, as-built CONSTRUCTION
or Document: receipt, Data Contractor information general directer as up
Additional Bidders Including Project lInnttments Owner, submittals BIDDING and others marked SERVICES
conferences from Bidding to of file of drawings end POST
Facilities Electrical MATERIALS Reproduction pre-bid the opening(s) ADMINISTRATION submittals, Drawings, nnntrant submittals required master FOR OHIP DRAWINGS accuracy Owner contractors FOR OH/P ALL OH/P
Delivery and in questions of bid at the of as of communications HOURS HOURS W/ general Contractorfs) record of the all HOURS HOURS WI HOURS HOURS W/
& BID to Interpretations of Ship hv $/HR FEE of to $/HR FEE $/HR FEE
County Schedule Phased Production Coordination Participation Responses Attendance EVALUATION Processing on action reaulred Distribution representatives Maintenance Related TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL RECORD Review the Transmittal identified. Incorporating TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Plumbing PRODUCTION ADDENDA BIDDING or CONSTRUCTION BUILT by . Group
Scope .01 .02 .01 .02 .03 BID .01 .02 .03 .04 AS .02 .03 .04
Demolition DLR
Maricopa and Mechanical, A.6.1 A.6.2 A.6.3 A.6.4 A.6.5 A.8.2.1
Fee 25

$0.00
OTHER
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 6/22/2016
16022 ..
# # .
Job Job CLERICAL $75.00 10
Date: DLR Owner .
TECHNICAL $100,00
$75.00
SUPPORT
,
$100.00
JOB CAPTAIN
.
/ENG. $135.00
PROJECT .12 -12 2
ARCH
. .
$170.00
PROJECT MANAGER:%. . 16 26
. Page
- . .:
$2.30.00..
SENIOR DESIGNER
.
TASK HOURS 62 30 36 4 2 0 0 0 6 0 6 6 0 6 10 4 4 1 0 6 6 6 6 0 0
Department
site
the
serving
utilities utilities ' t
Management Services of to facilities facilities
adequacy connections and and
Design (NP) disposal disposal systems and for extensions extensions
distribution and treatment and size requirements
Facilities Plant Photos and distribution distribution collection mechanical systems location, utility utility
coordination & coordination DESIGN service and and water collection systems DESIGN of of off-site off-site
Central ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes supply drainage sewer waste water plant systems control illumination Communications for of
County Schedule Project Meeting Consultant Drawings Project Meeting Consultant UTILITY Electrical service Gas Water Site Sanitary Process Storm Central Fire Emergency Security Pollution Site UTILITY Confirmation Determination Planning Design
Group
Scope Engineer PROJECT .01 -02 .03 PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 ON-SITE .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .11 .12 .13 .14 OFF-SITE .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 .06 DLR
/ Programming Measured
Maricopa and AAA:, A.2.0 A.2.3 A.2.4
Architect
Fee A.1 A.2

$0.00 $0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER a 6/22/2016
16022 I
# # Job $75.00 $1,050
Job CLERICAL 14
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 60 60 $100.00 $6,000
SUPPORT 16 $75.00 $1,200
$100.00 $2,500
JOB CAPTAIN 15 25
/ENG. . $136.00 $19,305
PROJECT 12 12 143
ARCH .
$170.00 $16,300
PROJECT .MANAGER 90 27
Page
$230.00 $690
SENIOR ;DESIGNER.:. 3
TASK HOURS 14 20 0 0 0 29 80 351 351 $46,045 12 1 4 4 2 2 2 2 0 0
Department
meetings
the and of work project I
the Proiec the materials community
Management Services inaccuracies, CHECKING and the for for and
capabilities drawings work disciplines prepared regulations explanatory agency
Design capabilities capabilities critical for measured PHASE architectural documents graphic at
Facilities Plant structural mechanical electrical drawings conditions THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the involved of applicable and behalf
SURVEYS existing existing existing existing required of field of W/ coordination between other checking CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL consultations critical written Owner's on
Central measurements of of of of BUDGETING HOURS HOURS $fHR FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes and and of of
County Schedule FACILITIES Photography Field Analysis Analysis Analysis Review development Docurnentetion TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL DESIGN Project Meeting Consultant Coordination enoineerino Review Agency Research Preparation Appearances
Engineer PRESENTATIONS PROJECT DISCIPUNES Group
Scope EXISTING .01 .02 .03 .05 .08 .07 .08 PROJECT SCHEMATIC .01 -02 .03 .01 .02 AGENCY .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.2.6 A.2.7 A.2.8 A.3.1 A.3.2 A.3.3
Fee A.3

6/2212016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# #
Job Job
CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT
JOB CAPTAIN
PROJECT ARCH/ENG. .
PROJECT MANAGER . 2 28
.
Page
.SENIOR bESIGNERA
TASK HOURS 16 16 18 6 o 0 0 0 18 18 18 18 18 0 0 14 14 14 14 0 0 0 10 10 0
Department
the
and with architectural
volumes,
systems consistent
Management Services materials and areas standard alternative disciplines COST
and materials, of
systems dimensions, quality suitability other of
Design DOCUMENTATION plans elevations building DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION architectural and and ectuipment activities SCHEDULING CONSTRUCTION
Facilities Plant building and of approximate systems requirements DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION distribution alarms system requirements RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS potential criteria availability and similar
and site sections selection of sketch(s) / DESIGN / source(s) conservation ventilating mechanical systems and and systems communications electrical of their and rriPqinn of systems of PROBABLY
Central model(s) DESIGN and conditioning protection space service detection space ial DEVELOPMENT
County Schedule ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Conceptual Preliminary Preliminary Development Perspective Study Energy Energy Heating Air Plumbing Fire Special Process General Power Lighting Telephones Fire Security Electronic Special General Identification equipment cnncenti Investigation materials. Coordination OF
Engineer STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL MATERIALS PROJECT STATEMENT Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 -05 26 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .01 .02 .03 DLR
/
Maricopa and A.3.4 A.3,5 A.3.6 A.3.7 A.3.11 A.3.12 A.3.13
Architect
Fee

$0.00 $0
:OTHER 0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 6/22/2016
16022
# # Job $75.00 $0
Job CLERICAL. 0
Date: DLR Owner
.
TECHNICAL 98 $100.00 $9,800 16
_
$75.00 $0
:SUPPORT 0
i $800
$100.00
JOB CAPTAIN 8
'
/ENG".: $135.00 $6,615
,PROJECT 49 20 20 .
ARCH
$170.00 $21,420
PROJECT., 'MANAGER 126 29
, _ Page
$0
SENIOR DESIGNER' 0 $230.00
: I
TASK HOURS 281 281 $38,635 10 4 0 0 0 9 6 0 0 8 8 o 0 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 0 0 0
Department
meetings
of
Work Proiec Project materials community I
the the
Management Services CHECKING and the for for and
work prepared explanatory agency
disciolines
Design PHASE architectural documents regulations graphic at behalf DOCUMENTATION
Facilities Plant THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the involved of and Owner's elevations details sketch(s) selections
WI coordination between other checking CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL consultations applicable written on and construction layouts
Central HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes arid and of of sections dimensional model(s) materials
County Schedule TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT Project Meeting Consultant Coordination enaineerina Review Agency Research Preparation Appearances ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Plans, Typical Three Study Final Equipment
Engineer PRESENTATIONS PROJECT Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DISCIPLINES .01 .02 .03 .04 AGENCY .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 DLR
Maricopa and A.3.14 DESIGN A.4.1 A.4.2 A.4.3 A.4.4
Architect!
Fee A.4

6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# #
Job Job
CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
•
TECHNICAL 20
,
.'Stm.r.pm-
' ;: .
JOB :CAPTAINi
• •
• • /ENG.
EpROJECT ARCH
• •
PROJECT MANAGER 30
• • Page
SENIOR DESIGNER
TASK HOURS 10 10 10 0 0 0 32 32 32 12 0 0 0 14 12 14 14 0 4 4 4
Department
of their
materials, Standards and outline
' systems equipment and
Management components architectural quality and disciplines criteria COST
Services components communications and design
lists capacities major of significant criteria systems other
Design dimensions structural and and their of including • CONSTRUCTION
and criteria major clearances materials sizes layouts equipment clearances control measures electrical capacities layouts equipment clearances of and materials, standards. activities manual lists SCHEDULING
Facilities Plant DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION system design criteria of or DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION equipment equipment for and vibration DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION and equipment for and DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS identification equipment architectural similar design materials
design sizing coordination specifications space chases and coniervation lighting, sizes space chases DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION form quality of of or PROBABLY
County Schedule Central structural structural Foundation Preliminary Approximate Preliminary Required Required Acoustical impacts for Approximate Preliminary Required Required brief and systems significant and Coordination Production Specifications DEVELOPMENT OF
Basic Final Critical Outline Visual Energy Criteria and criteria
Engineer STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PROJECT STATEMENT Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 CIVIL .01 .02 .03 DLR
Maricopa and A.4.5 A.4.7 A.4.8 A.4.9 A.4.11 A.4.12 A.4.13
Architect!
Fee

$0.00
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 6/22/2016
16022
# # • $0
Job Job CLERICAL. 0 $75.00 2
Date: DLR Owner •
I
TECHNICAL 148 $100.00 $14,800 120 40 •
$75.00 $0
0
SUPPORT
; I $100.00 $0
JOB CAPTAIN 0 40
*
!ENG. $135.00 $13,905
PROJECT 103 10 20 o -t
ARCH
'
PROJECT MANAGER 88 $170.00 $14,960 60 30- .
31
Page
$0
$230.00
SENIOR DESIGNER 0
TASK HOURS 339 339 $43,665 10 10 8 0 0 20 10 0 0 8 4 0 260
Department
of work Project
I the Protect the
Management Services CHECKING and the for for meetings
work prepared agency
Design PHASE architectural disciplines documents regulations at behalf DOCUMENTATION
the involved DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION
Facilities Plant THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT other of CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL Owners DOCUMENTATION
HOURS HOURS W/ DRAWINGS ADMINISTRATION coordination between and checking consultations applicable on DOCUMENTATION
Central $/HR FEE Meetings minutes and of DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN
County Schedule TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project meeting Consultant Coordination enaineerino Review Agency Research Appearances ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN DESIGN
Engineer PROJECT DISCIPLINES STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL DESIGN LANDSCAPE INTERIOR Group
Scope CONSTRUCTION .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 AGENCY .01 .02 .03 CIVIL DLR
Maricopa and A.5.1 A.5.2 A.5.3 A.5.4 A.5.5 A.5,6 A.55 A.5.8 A.6.9 A.5.10
Architect!
Fee A.5

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
OTHER 0 0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $1,050 $75.00 $2,100
Job CLERICAL. 14 28
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 220 $100.00 $22,000 526 $100.00 $52,600
$75.00 $1,800 $75.00 $3,000
SUPPORT 24 40
i $100.00 $10,00 $100,00 $14,100
JOB CAPTAIN 108 141
/ENG.. $136.00 $19,710 $135.00 $69,535
PROJECT: 146 441
ARCH
$170.00 $29,240 $170.00 $80,920
PROJECT MANAGER 172 476 32
Page
$230.00 $460 $230.00 $1,150
SENIOR:: .DESIGNER: 2 5
, ;
TASK HOURS 2 2 8 0 4 4 4 2 686 686 $85,060 1657 1657 $213,405
Department
Bidding bidding, and the other quality Project. disciplines Contract, Specifications Work. Specifications he of
of of Owner of and the of other the the scope Project
preparation conditions the preparation Specifications workmanship, by of and of and the in the
Management Services and and between Supplementary,; construction Specifications conditions drawings subdivisions Drawings changes for
place and architectural equipment, the on schedules
Design development time, Agreement development (General, of and for of including Soecifications of special alternate special of prices PHASE SERVICE
in the of systems required development Manual DOCUMENTS/SCHEDULING on or bids established
Facilities Plant RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS Owner describe form(s) in Contract preparation criteria and coordination prices coordination of THIS OH/P THIS OH/P
the which and Owner the and materials, the of Project of Documents and or bids and alternate update HOURS HOURS Wf HOURS HOURS W/
Central to forms, the to of performance obtaining obtaining and $JHR FEE $/HR FEE
County Schedule Assistance Documents bidding Contractorls1 Conditions Conditional Development describing Coordination Compilation Eliddirto BIDDING Preparation Preparation Ininrk Review TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
Assistance and for for Group
Scope Engineer MATERIALS .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 SPECIAL .01 .02 -03 DLR
/
Maricopa and A.6.11 A.5.12
Architect
Fee

$0.00 $0.00 $o
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER o 6/22/2016
16022
# # Job $7500 $75.00 $o
Job CLERICAL o
Date: DLR Owner
$0
TECHNICAL $100.00 o $100.00
$75.00 $75.00 $o
SUPPORT o
I $0
$100.00 $100.00
JOB CAPTAIN o
. . /ENG. $135,00 $135.00 $270
PROJECT 2
'ARCH
.
. $170.00 $170.00 $340
'PROJECT MANAGER 1 . 2 33
Page
. $230.00 $230.00 $230
SENIOR DESIGNER • 1
$840
TASK HOURS 0 0 0 0 2 2 o 0 0 5 5 4 1 2 0 o
Department
Management Services
Design (NP) PHASE
Facilities Bridge Photos THIS OH/P
coordination coordination W/ coordination
Courts ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes & ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes BUDGETING HOURS HOURS $/HR FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes
County Schedule Project Meeting Consultant Drawings Project Meeting Consultant TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL DESIGN project Meeting Consultant
Engineer PRESENTATIONS Group
Scope Programming PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 PROJECT .01 .02 -03 .04 .05 PROJECT SCHEMATIC PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
/ Measured
Maricopa and A.1.0 A.2.0 A.2.7 A.2.8 A.3.1
Architect
Fee A.1 A.2 A.3

6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# #
Job Job
CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT.
•
r
JOB CAPTAIN
.
/ENG.
PROJECT
ARCH
PROJECT MANAGER 34
Page
SENIOR DESIGNER
TASK HOURS 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 7 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 9 9 9 7 0 0
Department
meetings
of work project volumes
the Prolec the materials community materials and
Management Services CHECKING and the for for and and areas •
work prepared explanatory agency
Design disciplines regulations at systems dimensions,
architectural documents graphic behalf 0 DOCUMENTATION plans elevations building DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION
Facilities Bridge COORDINATION/DOCUMENT the Involved of CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL applicable and Owner's building and of approximate systems requirements
between other and checking consultations critical written on and site sections selection of sketch(s) / / conservation ventilating mechanical
Courts and of of model(s) DESIGN DESIGN source(s) and conditioning protection systems space
County Schedule Coordination enoineerina Review Agency Research Preparation Appearances ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Conceptual Preliminary Preliminary Development Perspective Study Energy Energy Heating Plumbing Fire Special Process General
Engineer AGENCY STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL Air Group
Scope DISCIPLINES .01 .02 .03 .04 -01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .10 .11
/ DLR
Maricopa and A.3.2 A.3.3 A.3.4 A.3.5 A.3.6
Architect
Fee

$0.00 $0
612212016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 6/22/2016
16022
# # Job $75.00 $0
Job CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner
•
TECHNICAL 37 $100.00 $3,700
$75.00 $0
SUPPORT 0
$100.00 $400
JOB CAPTAIN 4
•
$135.00 $3,375
PROJECT. ARCH./ENG. 25
••• '• •
. $170.00 $8,840
'PROJECT: MANAGER 52 35
• • • ' . Page
,• $0
$230.00
SENIOR. 0
.
$16,315
TASK HOURS 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 118 118 3 2 0 0 0
Department
the
and with architectural
systems consistent 1
Management Services materials, standard alternative disdplines COST
of
Design architectural quality suitability other of CONSTRUCTION
and and eauioment activities SCHEDULING PHASE
Facilities Bridge DESIGN100CUMENTA11ON distribution alarms system requirements RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS potential criteria availability and similar THIS OH/P
and and systems communications electrical of their and riecinn of systems of PROBABLY HOURS HOURS W/ FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes coordination
Courts service detection space DEVELOPMENT $/HR DEVELOPMENT
County Schedule Power Lighting Telephones Fire Security Electronic Special General Identification equipment rpm-L.01'ml Investigation materials. Coordination OF TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL Project Meeting Consultant
Engineer ELECTRICAL MATERIALS PROJECT STATEMENT PRESENTATIONS Group
Scope .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .06 .09 .10 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
Maricopa and / A.3.7 A.3.11 A.3.12 A.3.13 A.3.14 DESIGN A.4.1
Architect
Fee A.4

,
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# #
Job Job
,'CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
•
_TECHNICAL.
SUPPORT:.
JOB .CAPTAIN. 14
/ENG.
PROJECT ARCH
. *.
PROJECT •MANAGER 36
Page
SENIOR ..DE$1GNER
TASK HOURS 2 2 o 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 17 25 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
Department
meetings
of
work Proiec Project materials community
Management Services the and the the for
CHECKING for and components
work prepared explanatory agency
Design architectural disciplines at dimensions structural lists
documents regulations graphic behalf DOCUMENTATION materials
Facilities Bridge the Involved of and elevations details sketch(s) DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION and criteria criteria major clearances or
COORDINATION/DOCUMENT between other checking CONSULTING/REVIEW/APPROVAL applicable written Owner's and selections system design of
and consultations of on construction dimensional layouts design sizing coordination specifications
Courts and of sections model(s) materials structural structural
County Schedule Coordination enaineerina Review Agency Research Preparation Appearances ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN Plans, Typical Three Study Final Equipment Basic Final Foundation Preliminary Critical Outline
Engineer STRUCTURAL Group
Scope DISCIPLINES .01 .02 .03 .04 AGENCY .01 02 . .03 .04 .05 .06 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 DLR
/
Maricopa and A.4.2 A.4.3 A.4.4 A.4.6
Architect
Fee

6122/2016 30-16120-00 OTHER 6/22/2016
16022
# Job*
Job 'CLERICAL
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT
JOB CAPTAIN
/ENG.
PROJECT
•ARCH
.
PROJECT MANAGER 37
Page
SENIOR DESIGNER
TASK HOURS 12 8 8 4 0 0 0 0 4 3 4 4 0 0 0 2 2 2 0
Department
of their outline
materials, standards and and
systems equipment
Management Services components architectural quality and disciplines critena COST
capacities communications major and systems other design
Design and and of significant criteria of including CONSTRUCTION
sizes layouts equipment clearances control measures electrical capacities layouts equipment clearances of their and materials, standards. activities manual lists SCHEDULING
Facilities Bridge DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION equipment equipment for and vibration DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION and equipment for and DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS identification equipment architectural similar design materials
space chases and conservation lighting, sizes space chases DESIGN/DOCUMENTATION form quality of or or DEVELOPMENT PROBABLY
County Schedule Courts Approximate Preliminary Required Required Acoustical Impacts Energy for Criteria Approximate Preliminary Required Required brief and systems significant and criteria Coordination Production Specifications OF
Visual LANDSCAPE and PRESENTATIONS Group
Scope Engineer MECHANICAL .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 ELECTRICAL .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 CIVIL MATERIALS .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 PROJECT STATEMENT DLR
Maricopa and A.4.6 A.4.7 A.4.8 A.4.9 A.4.11 A.4.12 A.4.13 A.4.14
Architect!
Fee

$0.00 $0
612212016 30-16120-00 OTHER 0 6/22/2016
16022
Job* # Job '4 $75.00 $o
CLERICAL 0
Date: DLR Owner
.TECHNICAL 42 $100.00 $4,200
SUPPORT 0 $75-.00
$100.00 $2,000
JOB CAPTAINi 20
/ENG. $135.00 $4,050
PROJECT 30
ARCH
• .
$170.00 $5,440
PROJECT MANAGER 32 38
• Page
s0
SENIOR DESIGNER: 0 $230.00
• •
TASK HOURS 124 124 $15,690 2 4 3 0 o 4 2 0 4 2 0 0 0
Department
of
I work I Project
the • the
Management Services CHECKING and for meetings
work prepared agency
•
Design PHASE . architectural • 0 - documents regulations at behalf DOCUMENTATION
the • DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTATION
Facilities Bridge THIS OH/P COORDINATION/DOCUMENT - II of CONSULTINGIREVIEW/APPROVAL Owner's DOCUMENTATION
HOURS W/ DRAWINGS coordination between I checking consultations applicable on DOCUMENTATION
Courts HOURS $/HR FEE ADMINISTRATION Meetings minutes and of DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN
County Schedule TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL project Meeting Consultant Coordination Review Agency Research Appearances ARCHITECTURAL/DESIGN DESIGN
Engineer DISCIPUNES AGENCY STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL DESIGN LANDSCAPE INTERIOR Group
Scope CONSTRUCTION PROJECT .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .01 .02 .03 .04 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 CIVIL DLR
/
Maricopa and A.6.1 A.6.2 A.5.3 A.6.4 A.5.6 A.5.6 A.5.7 A.5.8 A.5.9 A.5.10
Architect
Fee A.6

$0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
OTHER 0 0
6/22/2016 30-16120-00 16022 6/22/2016
# # Job $75.00 $300 $75.00 $300
Job CLERICAL 4 4
Date: DLR Owner
TECHNICAL 120 $100.00 $12,000 199 $100.00 $19,900
$75.00 $450 $75.00 $450
SUPPORT 6 6
• $100.00 $5,600 $100.00 $8,000
CAPTAIN 56 80
/ENG.- $135.00 $10,935 $135.00 $18,630
•PROJECT 81 138
ARCH
•
PROJECT;:: $170.00 $13,090 $170.00 $27,710
MANAGER 77 163 39
• - Page
$230.00 $0 $230.00 $230
SENIOR: ESiGNER 0 1
$42,375 $75,220
TASK HOURS 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 344 344 591 591
Department
Bidding bidding, and the other quality Project. disciplines Contract, Specifications Work. Specifications he of
of of Owner of and the of other the the scope Project =
preparation conditions the preparation Specifications workmanship, by of and Of and the in the
Management Services and and between and Supplementary, construction: Specifications conditions drawings subdivisions Drawings changes for
place Agreement architectural equipment, the for including special special on schedules
Design development time, development (General, of and of Soecitications of alternate of prices PHASE SERVICE
in the of in systems required development Manual DOCUMENTS/SCHEDULING on or bids established
Facilities Bridge RESEARCH/SPECIFICATIONS Owner describe form(s) Owner Coritract preparation criteria and coordination prices coordination of THIS OH/P THIS OH/P
the which and the the and materials, the of Project of Documents and or bids and alternate update HOURS HOURS W/ HOURS HOURS W/
Courts to forms, to of performance and $/HR FEE S/HR FEE
County Schedule Assistance Documents bidding Cnntrartnrfel Assistance Conditions T.onditinnel Development describing Coordination Compilation Diddlno BIDDING Preparation obtaining Preparation obtaining Wnrk Review TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL TOTAL STAFF RATE TOTAL
and for for Group
Scope Engineer MATERIALS .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 SPECIAL .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 DLR
Maricopa and Architect! A.5.11 A.5.12
Fee

SYSKA IIEINESSY
GROUP 800 Corporate Pointe, Suite 200 • Culver City, CA 90230 310.312.0200 • www.syska.com
June 15,2016
Larry Smith
Architect I Principal
Ismith@dlraroud.com
DLR Group
Architecture Engineering Planning Interiors
0: 602-381-8580 m: 602-999-9693
6225 North 24th Street, Suite 250 Phoenix, AZ 85016-2042
Re: Madison Street Jail Reuse
225 W. Madison
Phoenix AZ
Vertical Transportation Design Services
Dear Mr. Smith:
We are pleased to submit this Proposal for providing Vertical Transportation Design Services for the six (6)
elevators located in the Madison Street Jail Reuse Project
The description of scope and services to be provided reflects our current understanding of this project, and
the terms define our obligations to each other in this professional relationship. Upon acceptance of this
Proposal we will prepare an Agreement for signature by both parties.
The fee includes Syska attending 2 meetings (which are concurrent with Site Reviews) and performing 2 site
visits in Phoenix AZ.
I. SCOPE OF DESIGN SERVICES
1. Schematic Design
a. Perform a site review to develop an understanding of existing conditions and future demands for
the user groups.
b. Review Architects core and layout assumptions. Provide necessary comments and
recommendations relating to the design.
c. Submit a written report based upon the analysis and planning design. Report shall include:
• Preliminary layout information in matrix format (hoistway, pit and overhead dimensions)
d. Design criteria, assumptions and engineering recommendations will be reviewed with the Owner
and Architect to insure that the criterion reflects the unique conditions such as the building
structure as it pertains to the elevators; floor to floor distances; hoistway openings, vertical
dimensions related to the raised floor and control requirements for internal security.
e. Provide a project specific checklist outlining areas of coordination for architectural, electrical,
mechanical and structural disciplines.
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP
dAbaratia fileAl projects \arizona \modison project \ 2016 06 15 proposal for madison jail reuse project oz rev6sed2 final.docx

Re: Madison Street Jail Reuse Project June 15,2016
Vertical Transportation Design Services
f. Review the design documents, project program, design criteria, and other pertinent
documents provided by the Architect and provide comments on those documents
relative to the Vertical Transportation design and space requirements.
g. Provide a Vertical Transportation code analysis including state & local ordinances and
interpretations.
h. Prepare description of Basis for Design.
i. Syska Hennessy will attend one meeting upon the initiation of services and will attend all
other meetings via internet media.
2. Design Development
a. Review Architect's core and layout assumptions. Provide necessary comments and
recommendations relating to the design.
b. Provide a project specific checklist outlining areas of coordination for architectural,
electrical, mechanical and structural disciplines.
c. Prepare layout drawings in AutoCAD for all vertical transportation equipment. Plans and
sections for machine room, hoistway and pit will be provided. A generic layout which is a
composite of all major companies will be the basis of the layout drawings.
d. Provide design information for interface with other engineering disciplines including:
• Equipment loads
• Electrical power requirements
• Heat emissions
• Ventilation requirements
• Space requirements
e. Review architectural drawings as they relate to vertical transportation equipment. Provide
written comments along with advice, assistance or information on any items related to the
drawings, as required by the Architect.
f. Consult with the Owner's representative, the Architect, and other consultants.
g. Participate in web-ex or conference calls as required.
3. Construction Documents
a. Review architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical design and construction documents
related to vertical transportation equipment. Provide written comments, diagrams and other
information required to ensure coordination of systems with vertical transportation equipment.
Effort will be ongoing during the Construction Document phase. Consult with the Architect and
other consultants and provide written comments, information, or other advice as required.
b. Update elevator equipment mechanical, electrical and structural loads as appropriate. Provide
comments and recommendations as appropriate to ensure coordination with all partners.
c. Review and coordinate hoistway sizes, pit depths, machine room area requirements, etc. with the
Design Team.
d. Prepare detailed and complete vertical transportation specifications for competitive bidding
using the consultant's standard three-part C.S.I. format. The specification will include
performance criteria and establish the quality of the equipment required. The specifications will
be developed to ensure that equipment meets the needs of the project.
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP I PAGE 2
dAborotto files \ .1 projects \orizona modison project \ 2016 06 15 proposal tor roodison foil reuse project oz revised2 finol.docx

Re: Madison Street Jail Reuse Project June 15,2016
Vertical Transportation Design Services
e. Documents will be prepared to encourage competitive bidding and identify related elevator
work to be performed by other trades.
f. Review cost estimates for vertical transportation systems. Review cost implications of various
vertical transportation options, alternatives, and/or design alternatives proposed by other team
members.
g. Hennessy will participate in web-ex or conference calls as required.
4. Bid
a. The elevators can be issued as part of the CD Bid Package.
b. Respond to questions during bid phase from Architect and other team members.
c. Respond to questions raised by Owner and other review agencies.
5. Construction Administration
a. Review relevant shop drawings submitted by the contractor for code compliance. Mark
up drawings to ensure compliance with contract documents.
b. Review and assist in the preparation of change orders, bulletins or addenda in
document required.
c. Respond to RF1's issued by the Contractor, Owner or Architect.
d. Conduct a final installation review to document equipment compliance and
performance with contract requirements. Provide a written report covering the
performance data and itemize deficiencies.
e. Review close-out documents and warranty documentation.
6. Clarifications and Qualifications
a. All drawings will be provided in AutoCAD format.
b. Elevator cab layouts and design of architectural items including, cab interiors, hoistway
entrances, hoistway enclosures, fixture details (hall and car call buttons, hall lanterns, etc.)
are not included.
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP I PAGE 3
dAborotlo files \ 1 projects \ orizono modison project \ 201606 15 proposal tot rnoclison jail reuse project oz revised2 final.docx

**WV:
ViiiikS-;`
Re: Madison Street Jail Reuse Project June 15,2016
Vertical Transportation Design Services
II. FEES AND PAYMENTS
1. Fee and Payment: The payments to the consultant will be made on the basis of the status of
completion of each phase as follows:
Reimbursable
Total Total Fee By Total Number of Number of Estimates
Phase Responsible Person Hourly Rate Hours By Phase and Fee By Site Reviews Meetings (not in base
Phase Task Phase fee)
Senior
Schematic Principal/Associate $208 75 $13,175
Design Partner
Design/Drawings $150 16 $2,325
1-
Schematic $15,500 1 Concurrent $ $2,250
Design with Site
Reviews
Senior
Design Principal/Associate $208 44 $9,160
Development Partner
Design/Drawings $150 61 $9,160
Design 105 $18,320 0 0
Development
Senior
Construction Principal/Associate $208 88 $18,300 0 0
Documents Partner
Design/Drawings $150 41 $6,100
$24,400
Senior
Bidding and Principal/Associate $208 13 $2,704 $2,704 0 0
Negotiation Partner
1
Construction Senior Concurr ent
Principal/Associate $208 68 $14,100 1 with Site $2,800
Administration Partner
Reviews
Field Inspector $150 31 $4,700
Construction $18,800
Administration
TOTAL ALL 541 $79,724 $79,724 2 2 $ 5,050
PHASES
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP I PAGE 4
d:\boratla tiles\ I projects \often° modison project \ 2016 06 IS proposal for madison jol tease project at revised2 final.docx

ItalizMiNig.VATICARMWO 44:
Re: Madison Street Jail Reuse Project June 5,2O6
Vertical Transportation Design Services
2. Compensation for Additional Services
Where additional services are required, the following rates will apply:
Principal/Associate Partner: $208 per hour
Project Manager: $208 per hour
Engineer/Drafting: $150 per hour
Field Inspector: $ 85 per hour
3. Reimbursable Expenses
a. The following will be reimbursed at cost, over and above any other fees and compensation:
i. All Travel costs.
4. Prompt Payment
b. Delayed Payment Charges:
Invoices are payable when presented. In the absence of a good faith dispute with respect to
all, or a portion of an invoice, invoices, or undisputed portions thereof, payments received by
Engineer more than thirty days after invoice date are subject to delayed payment charges of
1.5% per month.
Engineer shall be entitled to recover all legal fees and other costs expended in obtaining
payment of overdue amounts from the Client.
c. Right to Cease Work:
If payments are not received in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, Engineer may
at his discretion and with fifteen days' notice to The Client, without liability, cease work until
payment is received.
d. Reduction or Setoff Payments:
Payments under this contract shall not be subject to reduction or set off by reason of any claims
against Engineer.
e. You represent that there are no special or contingent arrangements or provisions relative
to compensation that exist between you and Owner which may impact upon your ability
to make payments to Engineer as herein provided.
III. GOVERNING LAW
This Proposal shall be in all respects subject to and construed in accordance with the law of the State
of Arizona.
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Our standard terms and conditions (STC) are appended to this proposal as Attachment A and form
an integral part of our agreement to provide services. The STC and this proposal shall constitute the
entire agreement and no other terms and conditions in any documents, acceptance, or
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP I PAGE 5
boratta files \ 1 projects \ orizona \ madison project \ 2016 06 15 proposal for modison jail reuse project oz revised2 final.docx

Re: Madison Street Jail Reuse Project June 15, 2016
Vertical Transportation Design Services
acknowledgment shall be effective or binding (except for superior agreements expressly incorporated
by reference into same) unless expressly agreed to in writing by all parties concerned. If you did not
receive our STC, please contact us in writing and we will immediately provide same to you for your
review. In the event that these STC are not fully executed, they shall nonetheless be effective and
controlling to the parties so long as Syska has provided you with same and has begun work and not
received written objections or modifications.
Thank you for this opportunity to present our fee proposal for the referenced project. We would be
delighted to address any questions which you may have, and can be reached at 949 899 3392.
-Sincerely,-
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP, INC.
Michelle S. Baratta
Associate Partner
ACCEPTED:
Company:
Authorized By:
Signature:
Date:
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP I PAGE 6
dAborafia files\ 1 projects\ arizona \ modison project \ 2016 06 15 proposal for modison of reuse project 02revised2 finoldocx

Terms and Conditions
SYSKA HENNESSY
GROUP www.sysKa.com
DATE: June 15,2016 PROJECT LOCATION: Madison Jail Reuse Project
CLIENT: DIA GROUP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Vertical Transportation
Design Services
1. EXTENT OF AGREEMENT: These Terms and Conditions supplement and 4.1.2. required because of changes in the Project including,
govern all aspects of the obligations and liabilities between Syska Hennessy size, quality, complexity, the Client's schedule, the Client's budget, or the method
Group ("Syska") and the Client relating to the Project. Unless otherwise expressly of bidding or negotiating and contracting for construction;
defined, the terms used in this document have the same meaning as terms In the
Engineering Proposal which this document supplements. In the event of any 4.1.3. required due to errors or omissions in the services of any
Inconsistencies between these Terms and Conditions and the Engineering Client's consultant or anyone performing work;
Proposal or any other agreement ("collectively referred to as "Other
Agreements") executed previously or simultaneously to this document, the 4.1.4. required by the enactment or revisions to codes, laws or
provisions of these Terms and Conditions shall control and supersede all prior or regulations subsequent to the preparatibn of such documents;
simultaneous negotiations, representations and agreements, either written or oral. 4.1.5. due to changes required as a result of the Client's failure
The Other Agreements and these Terms and Conditions are referred to herein to render decisions In a timely manner; or
collectively as the "Agreement." The Client acknowledges and agrees that II has
reviewed these Terms and Conditions and that neither it nor Syska shall be 4.1.6. required to reduce the cost of the Project to comply with
deemed to be the scrivener of this document for the purpose of drawing an previous cost estimates or Project budgets, including value engineering.
inference to construe an ambiguity herein. In the event that these Terms and
Conditions are not fully executed, they shall nonetheless be effective and 4.2. AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: It shall be an
controlling to the parties so tong as Syska has provided same to the Client and Additional Service if Sysko Is requested to make any revisions to the Instruments of
has begun work and not received written objections or modifications. Services Service that are not the result of Syska's failure to comply with the Standard of
provided by Syska herein are solely for the benefit of the Client and nothing Care and all of the following activities after the issuance of Construction
contained in these Terms and Conditions shall create a contractual relationship Documents shall be considered Additional Services:
with or a cause of action in favor of a third party.
4.2.1. preparing any changes to the Instruments of Service or
2. DEFINITIONS: preparing other documentation, analysis and supporting data, evaluating
contractors' proposals, and providing other services in connection with change
2.1. The term "Instruments of Service" means all of the information orders and Construction Change or Extra Work Directives.
produced in furtherance of this project, including, without limitation, the plans
and specifications prepared by or for Syska, in any medium, including graphic 4.2.2. providing services in connection with evaluating
and pictorial representations, indicating the related engineering designs for the substitutions or alternates proposed by a contractor, the Client or others.
Project and shall include plans, sections, details, schedules, diagrams and written
descriptions which set forth the design intent of the Project as well as any other 4.2.3. providing services made necessary by the default or
drawings, diagrams, calculations, reports, operational and design data. termination of a contractor, by defects or deficiencies in the construction of the
Project or by the failure of performance on the pad of the Client, any contractor
2.2. The term "Work" means the construction and services, supplies, labor, or others performing services or Work in connection with the Project.
equipment, materials, components, or assemblies related to or required for the
construction of the Project by a contractor and other construction specialists. The 4.2.4. providing services in connection with claims submitted
Work may constitute the whole or a part of the Project, whether completed or by any contractor or others performing services or providing Work on the Project.
partially completed.
4.2.5. providing services in connection with the preparation for
2.3. The term "Construction Documents" shall mean the drawings and legal proceedings or attendance at public hearings or other meetings.
specifications from which the Work Is actually constructed.
4.2.6. providing services when submittals are reviewed prior to
2.4. The term "Record Documents" means a revised set of Construction receiving a submittal schedule, reviewing submittals out of sequence, or if more
documents based upon the As Buills prepared by Contractor, reflecting all major than two reviews are required of any submittal.
deviations made during the construction process.
4.2.7. providing services in responding to unnecessary,
2.5. The term "Project" shall refer to the description, location and identity excessive or unreasonable requests for information submitted by the Client, any
of the project in the header of this Agreement and as more fully described in the contractor or others who are performing Work or supplying materials in
scope of service which is part of this Agreement, of which the services performed connection with the Project.
under this Agreement may be the whole or pad.
4.2.8. providing services in excess of one punch list compilation
3. STANDARD OF CARE: Syska's services shall be performed in a manner for each area or component of the Project and one review of the punch list Hems
consistent with that degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by practicing for completion.
professionals performing similar services in the same locality, at the some site and
under the same or similar circumstances and conditions (the "Standard of Care"). 4.2.9. providing any services requested by the Client after the
Syska makes no other representations or warranties, express or implied, with earlier of the issuance of the final Certificate for Payment or sixty (60) days after
respect to the services rendered hereunder. Substantial Completion was originally scheduled.
4. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: The services described in this Paragraph are 4.2_10. providing services that are not customarily provided by
not included in Basic Services to be provided by Syska. If the Client requests that an engineer as basic services on projects of similar size, complexity and scope as
Syska perform any of the following services (the "Additional Services"), the Client the Project and which have not been set forth as Basic or Additional Services in
shall provide Syska with additional compensation equal to Syska's hours this Agreement.
expended at Syska's standard hourly rates. Syska's hourly rates may be adjusted
annually in accordance with Syska's standard practice. In the alternative, the 4.2.11. providing "fast track" services.
Client and Syska may agree on stipulated sum fees for specific Additional 4.2.12. segregating bidding packages for pricing and award of
Services. However, in no event shall Syska be compelled or required to perform contracts for the construction of the Project.
what It deems to be an Additional Service unless the Client provides the
appropriate written change order. 4.2.13. In the event that the Client seeks the assistance of Syska
in the prosecution of any claim against another Project participant, or the
4.1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: It shall be an defense of any claim asserted against the Client, then Syska shall be fully
Additional Service if Syska Is requested to make any revisions in the Instruments of reimbursed for all costs Incurred at the respective hourly rates identified for
Service when such revisions are: Additional Services together with any expenses associated therewith.
4.1.1. Inconsistent with approvals or instructions previously
given by the Client;
5. LIMITATIONS OF UABILITY:
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP I Page 1 of 4
d:\boratlo fileAl projects \ arizono \madizon projec1\2016 06 15 dk group -v1 ft.c.docx

Client: DLR GROUP TERMS AND CONDITIONS I June 15,2016
5.1. AGGREGATE LIMITS: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Client and deliverables that 11 agrees to and are incorporated in to the Client's Project
Syska each waive any right to consequential, liquidated or incidental damages Schedule. However, if Syska's ability to meet any of its specific milestone dates Is
and agree that the total liability, in the aggregate, of Syska and Syska's officers, adversely affected by the actions of the Client, construction manager, any
directors, employees, agents, and independent professional associates, and any contractor or others, then Syska's liability for missing any milestone dates shall be
of them, to the Client and any one claiming by, through or under the Client, for reduced to the extent the delay Is caused by the actions or failure to act of others.
any and all injuries, claims losses, expenses, or damages whatsoever arising out of
or in any way related to Syska's services, the Project or this Agreement, from any 5.7. RECORD DOCUMENTS: The Client acknowledges that Syska is
cause or causes whatsoever, including but not limited to, the negligence, errors, generally not responsible for the production or modification of Record
omissions, strict liability, breach of contract, misrepresentation, or breach of Documents as it is a contractor's sole responsibility, who through his
warranty of Syska or Syska's officers, directors, employees, agents or Independent superintendent, is constantly present at the site, in control of operations, and
professional associates, or any of them, shall not exceed the lesser of the total Involved in all details of construction. Should Syska be requested to prepare or
compensation received by Syska for the specific work performed resulting in modify Record Documents, the Client understands the limitations of the Record
Client's damages or the limits of the available insurance coverage specifically Documents and acknowledges and agrees that Syska has not verified the
identified and required by the Client for this Project at the time when the claim is accuracy or completeness of the Information on which the Record Documents
resolved. are based and agrees to indemnity and release Syska for any liability for any errors
or omissions that may be incorporated therein.
5.2. COST INCREASES: Syska is not responsible for cost increases to the
Project as a result of requests made by the Client after Construction Documents 5.8. ACCELERATED PROJECT DELIVERY OR FAST TRACK: In the event the
are issued for permit, changes in governmental agency requirements after Client chooses to take advantage of the potential time and cost savings benefits
previous approval, unforeseen conditions or causes beyond the reasonable of an accelerated project delivery or fast-track process, the Client acknowledges
control of Syska. For Work that has been omitted from the drawings and that it hos been advised that the Project will be affected. Some of the effe -cts of
specifications beyond the Standard of Care, but is necessary for the proper either process include the necessity of making early or premature commitments
completion of the Project and would have been added to the original bid if to design decisions and the issuance of incomplete and uncoordinated
shown on the drawings and specifications, if discovered at a time when the Work Construction Documents for permitting, bidding, and construction purposes. The
is more expensive to install than it would have been if originally shown on the Client acknowledges that the Project, if developed on either basis, will likely
drawings and spedfications, Syska's error Is measured as the portion of the costs require associated coordination, design, and redesign of parts of the Project after
and fees that would have been avoided in the original bid had the Work been Construction Documents are issued and the construction contract Is executed,
shown. In the event of a disagreement regarding Syska's error, the dispute and may require removal of work-in-place, all of which events may cause an
resolution procedures in this Agreement shall apply. increase in the Cost of the Work and/or an extension of the Project construction
schedule. Therefore, the Client acknowledges the necessity of including sufficient
5.3. THIRD-PARTY DEFICIENCIES: Syska is not responsible to the Client or contingencies In the budget for the Cost of the Work to account for additional
any third parties for errors, omissions or other deficiencies In the services of any costs and construction schedule extensions arising from either process.
other design professional or design-build contractor rendering design,
engineering or related services for the Client not employed by Syska. Syska's sole 5.9. MEDIA AND WEBSITE LIABILITY: The Client recognizes that the
liability in connection with the services of the Client's consultants or design-build Instruments of Service may be generated, stored, transmitted, or published in
contractors shall be lathe extent expressly identified in the scope of services. The various media, including, but not limited to traditional hard copy (i.e., blueprints),
Client shall require consultants or design-build contractors retained by the Client CADD formats, via Internet or Extranet websiles and the Instruments of Service
to coordinate their services and documents with those of Syska and Syska's may be subject to tampering, modifications by parties over whom Syska has no
consultants. control. The Instruments of Service are also subject to discrepancies as a result of
numerous factors, including, transmission and translation errors resulting from
5.4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT: Syska is not differences in computer software, hardware and equipment-related problems,
responsible for the actual construction of the Project and shall not be deemed to disc malfunctions and user error. If requested, Syska shall provide the Client with
have a duty of means and methods. the Instruments of Service in electronic form. The Client releases Syska from any
claims as a result of differences between Syska's filed hard copy and the
5.5. CERTIFICATION. Sysko is under no duty to execute certifications electronic form of the Instruments of Service. For each recipient to whom the
unless the language and the scope of the certification is provided to Syska prior Client provides the Instruments of Service in electronic form or to whom Syska
to performing work and Syska, In its professional opinion, believes that its scope provides the Instruments of Service in electronic form at the Client's request or
provides a sufficient basis for executing the certification. under this Agreement, the Client agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless
Syska, its consultants, and their respective officers, directors and employees from
5.6. INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE: The Instruments of Service are not a all claims, liability, loss, damages, judgments and costs, including reasonable
substitute for the shop drawings and other submittals which will be used to actually attorney's fees and expenses, arising from any differences between the filed hard
construct the Project. Nothing in the Agreement shall create or be deemed to copy and the electronic form of the Instruments of Service. The Client
create any duty upon Syska to supervise the construction means and methods acknowledges and agrees that ills responsible for the initiation and maintenance
and/or safety procedures of any contractor, subcontractor, or their employees or of any Project Internet or Extranet site and any related computer software and
agents, or any other person or party. Syska shall not incur any liability as a result hardware (collectively, the "Site") and for all costs associated therewith, including
of the acts, omissions, or failure to properly perform of any contractor, without limitation, any monthly fees for users of the Site charged by the service
subcontractor, or their employees or agents, or any other person or party. provider which shall be retained by the Owner. Syska shall have no responsibility
5.5.1. REVIEW SERVICES: If included as port of the scope of for the initiation or maintenance of the Site or for any costs associated with the
work, observation or review services performed by Syska pursuant to the Site. Syska shall also have no responsibility or liability for any delays or damages
Agreement, whether of material or work and whether performed prior to, during caused by the failure of the Site to function properly and shall not be liable to the
or after completion of construction, ore performed solely for the purpose of Client or to any contractor, consultant or any third party for any delays, errors or
attempting to determine general conformity of the work performed by others with omissions in Syska's services caused by the failure of the Site to function properly.
the contract plans and specifications. Syska shall not be responsible to make The Client agrees that all Project-related contracts shall provide that each user of
exhaustive or continuous reviews to check the quality or quantity of the Work. the Site Is granted a limited license to utilize the content of the Site in connection
with the Project only, with no right to sublicense or resell, consistent with and
5.6.2. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Upon the subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Client shall also obtain
request of the Client, Sysko shall review and comment on any proposed Project a release from each user of the Site naming Syska as a releasee from all claims,
construction budget or estimates of construction costs prepared by or for the liability, loss and damages, arising from or related to the publication of the
Client. The Client acknowledges that any comments represent Syska's judgment Instruments of Service or other materials on the Site.
as a professional familiar with the construction industry, and it is not responsible for 5.10, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Syska's services do not include services
(i) cost increases due to the timing of a contractors' buy-outs for the Project; (II) related to detection, reporting, permitting, analysis, or abatement of asbestos,
the cost of labor, materials or equipment; (ill) Contractors' methods of hazardous or toxic materials including molds and fungus (collectively "hazardous
determining bid prices; (iv) competitive bidding, market or negotiating materials") at the Project site. In the event Syska or any other party encounters
conditions; (v) contractors', fabricators' or suppliers' failure to meet Project hazardous materials at the jobsite, or should It become known in any way that
schedules; or (vi) the quality of construction work or the materials supplied for the hazardous materials may be present at the jobsite or any adjacent areas that
Project. Accordingly, Syska does not represent thot bids or negotiated prices will may affect the performance of Syska's services, Syska may, without liability for
not vary from the Client's Project construction budget or from any estimate of consequential or any other damages, suspend performance of services on the
construction costs reviewed by Syska. The Client further agrees that Syska shall Project until the Client retains appropriate specialist consultants or contractors to
have no liability for actual construction costs exceeding the Project construction Identity, abate and/or remove the hazardous materials and warrant that the
budget or prior cost estimates. If the Client requests that Syska provide redesign jobsile complies with applicable laws and regulations. To the fullest extent
services to reduce construction costs. Syska shall be compensated for such permitted by law, the Client shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Syska, its
redesign efforts as Additional Services, provided that such redesign efforts were consultants, and their respective officers, directors and employees from and
not required due to an error, Inconsistency or omission in the Instruments of Service against all claims, liability, loss, damages, judgments, costs, and expenses,
beyond the Standard of Care. including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses, which any of them may at
5.6.3. RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROJECT SCHEDULE: Syska Is any time sustain or incur by reason of any demands, claims, causes of action or
responsible for meeting the milestone dates set forth In a schedule of design
SYSKA FIENNESSY GROUP I Paae 2 of 4
d:\borotle WA' projeciAorizono \modison project \ 2016 06 15 dr group -vi i&e.docx

V181'
Client: DLR GROUP TERMS AND CONDITIONS I June 15, 2016
legal proceedings arising out of or in connection with asbestos, hazardous or toxic professional liability insurance for the Project, then the Client agrees that it will pay
materials on the Project site. the cost of the project policy and that Syska must agree on the limits of coverage,
parties covered, deductible required and length of the policy period after
5.11. INDEMNIFICATION: substantial completion of the services.
5.11.1. SYSKA INDEMNIFICATION OF CLIENT: Syska shall 7.3. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE: Syska shall upon request provide to the
indemnify, but not defend, the Client and Its officers, directors and employees Client certificates of insurance evidencing compliance with the insurance
from and against all, liability, loss, damages, judgments, costs, and expenses, requirements.
including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses to the extent caused by
Syska's negligent acts or negligent omissions in the preparation of the Instruments 8. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE: Syska Is the author
of Service and for patent, copyright or trademark infringement attributable to and owner of the Instruments of Service and shall retain all common law, statutory
Syska's services. The Client further agrees that, to the fullest extent permitted by and other rights, including copyrights, whether the project for which they are
law, no shareholder, officer, director, partner, principal, or employee of Syska shall made is executed or not. Provided Syska is fully compensated for Its services and
have personal liability under this Indemnification provision, under any provision of expenses on the Project, the Instruments of Service shall be made available to be
the Agreement or for any matter in connection with the professional services used for construdlon of the Project and for operation, modification and
provided in connection with the Project. In no event shall the duty to indemnify maintenance of the Project following its completion. The Instruments of Service
be deemed a duty to defend. shall not be used or reused by Client on other projects, for additions to this Project,
for completion of this project by others, or for any other purposes for which they
5.11.2. CLIENT INDEMNIFICATION OF SYSKA: The Client assumes were not specifically prepared, except with the express written consent of Syska
liability for and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Syska, its consultants, and and with appropriate compensation to Syska. The Client agrees that Syska, its
their respective officers, directors, and employees, from and against all liability, consultants, and their respective, officers, directors or employees shall have no
loss, damages, judgments and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees and liability to the Client and Client shall indemnify, defend and hold them harmless
expenses, to the extent they ore caused by an act or omission of the Client, its from and against all claims, liability, loss, damages, judgments and costs,
agents, employees, consultants or contractors. This indemnity applies to any including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses, which any of them may at
deviations from the Instruments of Service not approved by Syska in writing. The any time sustain or incur arising out of or resulting from the unauthorized use of the
Client shall provide written notice of any known Inconsistencies in Syska's services Instruments of Service..
expeditiously after discovery. The provisions of this section shall extend for all time
notwithstanding the termination or expiration of the Agreement. 8.1. Submission or distribution for governmental approvals or for other
proper purposes In connection with the Project is not to be construed as
6. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITY: The Client shall provide the following: publication in derogation of Syska's rights under copyright law.
6.1. Full information Identifying ils requirements for and limitations on the 8.2. The Client warrants that it has a license to use and/or copy any
Project. Syska is entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of the documents it supplies to Syska for re-use on this Project that were prepared by
information provided by the Client. others. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Client shall defend, indemnify
and hold harmless Syska, its consultants, and their respective officers, directors
6.2. A representative authorized to ad on the Client's behalf with respect and employees from and against all claims, liability, loss, damages, judgments
to the Project who shall render decisions in a timely manner pertaining to all and costs including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses, which any of them
requests and/or documents submitted by Syska. may at any lime sustain or incur by reason of breach of the Client's warranty.
6.3. Periodically update the budget for the Project and shall not 9. TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION: Except as otherwise provided in this
significantly increase or decrease the overall budget, the portion of the budget section, this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon not less than
allocated for the services performed herein, or any contingencies In the budget thirty (30) calendar days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to
without the agreement of Syska as to whether the change will require a perform In accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the
corresponding change in the Project scope and quality. party initiating the termination. If the defaulting party fails to cure its default within
Tests, Inspections and reports required by law or the Agreement, the thirty (30) calendar day notice period or fails to commence action to cure its
default when the cure cannot reasonably be completed within thirty (30) days,
including, but not limited to, chemical tests and tests for hazardous materials. the termination shall take effect without further notice.
6.5. All legal, insurance and accounting services, including auditing 9.1. Failure of the Client to make payments to Syska in accordance with
services that it determines shall be necessary to address the Client's needs and this Agreement shall be considered substantial non-performance and grounds for
interests relating to the Project. termination. At the option of Syska, if the Client fails to make payment when due
6.6. All fees necessary for securing the approval of authorities having Syska for services or expenses or fails to comply with any other material obligation
jurisdiction over the Project. under this Agreement, Syska may, upon seven (7) calendar days' written notice
to the Client, suspend the performance of its services under this Agreement.
6.7. Prompt written notice to Syska if the Client becomes aware of any Unless payment in full is received by Syska or the Client's other breach hereunder
fault or defect on the Project. is cured within the seven (7) calendar day notice period, the suspension shall take
effect without further notice. In the event of a suspension of services, Syska shall
6.8. The Client recognizing that there will be changes and additions to have no liability for any delay or damage caused because of such suspension of
engineering drawings during construction as a result of field conditions, changes services.
In code or other unforeseeable changes that impact the current design, shall
establish design and construction contingency funds after discussion with Syska 9.2. Upon a suspension of services by the Client, Syska shall be paid for all
to cover additional costs which may result from such changes and additions. The fees and expenses for services performed through the dale of the suspension plus
project budget shall include a minimum contingency of 5% of total construction demobilization expenses. Upon the resumption of Syska's services, Syska's fee
cost each for such design and construction contingency fund. shall be equitably adjusted and Syska shall be reimbursed for all expenses incurred
as a result of the suspension. If the Client's suspension of Syska's services continues
6.9. The Client shall inform Syska of all contractor change order requests for more than ninety (90) calendar days, Syska may terminate this Agreement
for work designed by Syska and shall obtain Syska's written opinion as to the upon seven (7) calendar days' written notice to the Client.
change request prior to execution of the change order.
10. FEE PROVISION: Promptly upon receipt, the Client shall review Syska's
6.10. The Client shall review and approve submissions for each phase of invoice requesting payment for services and reimbursable expenses. If the Client
the work in a timely manner and shall authorize Syska in writing to proceed with disputes in good faith any portion of the invoice, the Client shall notify Syska in
each succeeding phase. writing within five (5) days of receipt of the disputed invoice. The Client shall
indicate that portion of the invoice that if disputes and provide a statement as to
7. INSURANCE COVERAGES: the reasons for disputing such portion. Any statement or portion of statement not
disputed by the Client within the time period set forth herein, shall be paid by the
7.1. MINIMUM AMOUNT OF COVERAGE: Sysko shall maintain the following Client within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the invoice. All monies secured by the
minimum amounts of insurance during the term of this Agreement. Client to pay for the Services identified herein shall be deemed to be held in trust
Coverage for Syska and Syska shall have the right to require the Client, upon request, to
Type Workers' Compensation Statutory furnish evidence of the Client's ability to remit payment for all services. Syska's
Employer's Liability $ 1,000,000 fees do not include any taxes that may be imposed on them. Taxes, if applicable
General Liability (each occurrence) $ 1,000,000 to our fees for services, are above our fees quoted and the Client agrees to be
Automobile Liability (combined single limit) $ 1,000,000 responsible for any liability and payment of them.
Professional Liability $ 1,000,000 10.1. Payments due Syska and which remain unpaid shall bear interest 30
(per claim and in the aggregate) days from the date of the invoice at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per
Umbrella Liability $ 1,000,000 annum. Syska is entitled to recover any and all legal fees and any other costs
expended if it becomes necessary to pursue legal actions to collect fees due
7.2. PROJECT POLICIES: If the Client chooses to acquire a policy of hereunder. Client expressly acknowledges that Syska shall be entitled to a
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP I Page 3 of 4
dAborotto tileAl projects \piton° \modison project \ 2016 06 IS dk group -vt t&c.docx

,timent-mirarg...wram-;Zit, '0-K1E4'4
Client: DLR GROUP TERMS AND CONDITIONS I June 15,2016
judgment for Its attorney fees and court costs attributable to the collection of its perform which is occasioned by war, strike, Act of God, natural disaster, or other
fees which are ultimately adjudicated/arbitrated to be rightfully due and owing. casualty beyond the reasonable control of the Client or Syska.
10.2. In the event of a dispute pursuant to the services rendered 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/MODIFICATION/ASSIGNMENT: This Agreement
hereunder, the Client shall not have the right to set off any payments due or owing contains the entire agreement between parties with respect to the matters
to Syska and shall be obligated to remit all payments due and owing for covered herein and supersedes any previous agreements (oral or written) or
completed service. Syska's full payment pursuant to this section shall be a understandings between the parties. The Agreement may be amended only by
condition precedent for Its obligation of performance. written modification executed by both parties and may not be assigned without
the written permission of the non-assigning party. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
10.3. Payments are to be remitted via wire transfer based on the following Syska may assign this Agreement to an affiliated or related entity of Syska in order
information: to comply with professional registration requirements for engineering and
architecture companies within the jurisdiction in which the Project is located.
Beneficiary: Syska Hennessy Group. Inc.
1515 Broadway 17. PUBUCITY: Syska shall have the right to Include photographic or
New York, NY 10036 artistic representations of the design of the Project among its promotional and
professional materials. Syska shall be given reasonable access to the completed
Bank: TD Bank, N.A. Project to make such representations. However, Syska's materials shall not
475 Park Avenue South include the Client's confidential or proprietary information if the Client has
New York, New York 10016 previously advised Syska in writing of the specific information considered by the
Account No.: 7915510643 Client lobe confidential or proprietary. The Client shall provide professional credit
Routing No.: 026013673 for Syska in the Client's promotional materials for the Project.
18. SUCCESSORS/ASSIGNS: This Agreement shall be binding upon the
11. ANTI-BRIBERY AND ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITMENT: The parties parties' successors and permitted assignees. Syska may assign this Agreement to
agree that no payments or transfers of value by Client In connection with the an affiliated or related entity of Syska in order to comply with professional
Agreement shall be made that have the purpose or effect of public or registration requirements for engineering and architecture companies within the
commercial bribery, or acceptance of or acquiescence in, extortion, kickbacks, jurisdiction in which the Project Is located.
or other unlawful or improper means of obtaining business. Client hereby
represents, warrants, and covenants that Client and its subsidiaries, owners, 19. SEVERABILITY: The partial or complete invalidity of any one of more
partners, officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, and provisions of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or continuing force and
subcontractors are fully aware of the provisions of the United Slates Foreign effect of any other provision.
Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"), 15 U.S.C. §78dd-1, el seq., as amended
regarding, among other things, payments to government officials. Client hereby
represents, warrants and covenants that Client and its subsidiaries, owners,
partners, officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, and Agreed and Accepted by:
subcontractors will perform the Services in compliance with the FCPA and all
applicable international, federal, state, and local laws, including but not limited
to all bribery and corruption laws and all trade and economic sanctions lows. DLR GROUP
(Client)
12. NO SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYEES: The Client agrees and
acknowledges that if will riot directly or indirectly, solicit or hire any employee of By:
Syska or induce any Syska employee to terminate his or her employment with (Signature)
Syska without the express written consent of Syska. Recognizing that Syska has
expended a substantial investment in recruitment, advertisement, testing, and
training of their personnel, the Client agrees that if it violates the previous clause Name: Blake Reinhardt
and hires a Syska employee within one year of the completion of the Project, it (Print or type)
shall pay Syska for each employee thus hired, the amount atone year's salary, at
the last level of annual remuneration that employee received from Syska.
13. DISPUTE RESOLUTION: (Print or type)
13.1. MEDIATION: In recognition of the negative consequences
associated with disputes both in terms of lost time and expense to all parties, the
Client and Syska agree to settle their disputes by good-faith mediation as a Agreed and Accepted by Syska Hennessy Group, Inc.
condition precedent to the institution of legal proceedings by either party. If
mediation would jeopardize the substantive rights of either party due to the
application of any applicable statute of limitations, then mediation will be
required during the dispute resolution process to the extent It May be used without
jeopardizing the substantive rights of either party. The parties shall share the
mediator's fee and any filing fees equally. The mediation shall be held in the
place where the Project is located, unless another location is mutually agreed By:
upon. Syska's total financial liability shall be limited to the contract fee between (Signature)
Syska and DLR GROUP for Vertical Transportation Consulting.
14. NOTICES: Any and all notices or other communications required by Name: Michelle Baratta
this Agreement or by law to be served on, given to, or delivered to either party, (Print or type)
shall be in writing and shall be deemed received when personally delivered to
the party to whom it is addressed, project manager, or in lieu of such personal
service, upon receipt of telegraphic or facsimile notice or three (3) days after Title: Associate Partner
deposit in the United States mail, first-class, postage prepaid, at the respective (Print or type)
addresses set forth below:
Syska: Syska Hennessy Group, Inc.
800 Corporate Pointe, Suite 200
Culver City, CA 90230
Attention: Michelle Baratta
Client: DLR GROUP
Architecture Engineering Planning Interiors
6225 North 24's Street, Suite 250
Phoenix, AZ 85016-2042
1$. FORCE MAJEURE: Neither the Client nor Syska shall be held
accountable or penalized under the terms of this Agreement for the failure to
SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 4 of 4
d:\boroi10 RoAl projectsWaond\modison project\ 201606 15 dB group -v115c.docx

TR1CORD
ENGINEERING, LLC
Proposal Madison Street Jail Reuse
May 24, 2016
Estimator: Elliott Berg Client: DLR Group
Phone: (520) 990-4541 Contact: Larry Smith
File #16P053 Total Pages: 2
Scope of Services:
Engineering and design services including the following:
• Fire protection construction documents per project phasing listed below for the existing 251,955
square foot highrise building.
• Includes hydrant flow testing near the corners of Third and Jackson and Third and Madison as
required to determine the adequacy of the existing water supply.
• Layout major system features and distribution piping including the incoming water supplies, fire
pump, bulk standpipe feeds, standpipe and hose valve locations, and floor control assemblies.
• Determination of fire protection design requirements including the applicable AHJ, code
standards and editions, available water supply information, hazard classification and design
density.
Site visits and construction administration as outlined in the fee breakdown below.
Assumptions and Exclusions:
• Detailed design of the fire sprinkler systems is a deferred submittal to be developed by the
installing contractor.
• It is understood that participation in the weekly meetings or conference calls will only be on an
"as-needed" basis.
• Proposal does not include permit fees, taxes, or other items not listed above.
• Document printing cost is not included. Plans will be provided in pdf and CAD formats.
• Other disciplines are not included, such as civil, structural, fire alarm, and life safety engineering.
Fee breakdown by phase:
. Phase : Notes : Designer : FPE ($125/hr) . Subtotal
I ($75/hr)
- Schematic ! One site visit, two City of 1 $3,520.00 (44 ri3,126.00 (24"1-;i .$) :-i6;46116-6---
: Design i Phoenix flow tests. E hrs)
: Design I One site visit. 1 $2,880.00 (36 I $1,040.00 (8 hrs) $3,832.00
i Development I hrs)
; 1 Construction One site visit. I $2,400.00 (30 1 $1,040.00 (8 hrs) $3,232.00
Docs hrs)
1 Bid RFI Responses, etc. I $0.00 $780.00 (6 hrs) $500.00
I Construction I Three jobsite visits: Pre- I $1,920.00 (24 $5,200.00 (40 hrs) 1 $6,896.00
Admin : con, construct., and testing I hrs)
Total
www.tricorderacom

TRICORD
ENGINEERING, LLC
Offer Acceptance:
By:
Signature: Date:
Standard Terms and Conditions:
STANDARD OF CARE
Services performed by TriCord Engineering, LLC (hereinafter TriCord Engineering) under this Agreement will be performed in a
manner consistent with the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing
under similar circumstances.
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
TriCord Engineering shall perform their services with due and reasonable diligence consistent with sound professional practices and
project schedule.
LIABILITY
In the event that design errors, omissions, or deficiencies are discovered following completion and acceptance of the construction
documents, TriCord Engineering shall participate in definition of the problem and shall provide appropriate clarifications or
corrections to the contract documents without additional fee. If a construction modification is required as a result of the error,
omission, or deficiency, TriCord Engineering's potential liability is limited to additional costs which would not have been incurred had
the original documents been correct.
PAYMENT
If the Client fails to make payments when due or otherwise is in breach of this Agreement, TriCord Engineering may suspend
performance of services upon seven (7) calendar days' notice to the Client. TriCord Engineering shall have no liability to the Client
for costs or damages as a result of such suspension caused by breach of this Agreement by the Client.
VERIFICATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Remodeling and/or rehabilitation of an existing building requires that certain assumptions be made regarding existing conditions,
and because some of these assumptions may not be verifiable without expending additional sums of money or destroying otherwise
adequate or serviceable portions of the building, the Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold
TriCord Engineering harmless, from any claim, liability or cost (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of defense) for injury
or economic loss arising or allegedly arising out of the professional services provided under this Agreement.
MEDIATION
In an effort to resolve any conflicts that arise during the design or construction of the project or following the completion of the
project, the Client and TriCord Engineering agree that all disputes between them arising out of or relating to this Agreement initially
shall be submitted to non-binding mediation unless the parties mutually agree otherwise.
DOCUMENTS
The Client acknowledges TriCord Engineering's plans and specifications, including all documents on electronic media, as
instruments of professional service. The plans and specifications prepared under this Agreement shall become the property of the
Client upon completion of the services and payment in full of all monies due to TriCord Engineering. The client shall not use or
make, or permit to be made, any modification to the plans and specifications without the prior written authorization of TriCord
Engineering. The Client agrees to waive any claim against TriCord Engineering arising from any unauthorized reuse or modification
of the plans and specifications.
ATTORNEYS' FEES
In the event of any litigation arising from or related to the services provided under this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled
to recovery of all reasonable costs incurred, including staff time, court costs, attorney's fees and other related expenses, as
determined by Judgment.
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
When providing opinions of probable construction cost, the Client understands that TriCord Engineering has no control over costs or
the price of labor, equipment or materials, or over the Contractor's method of pricing, and that the opinions of probable construction
costs provided are to be made on the basis of TriCord Engineering' qualifications and experience. TriCord Engineering makes no
warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs.
www.tricordenq.com

ILDAN I
Erigincierit*
May 23, 2016
DLR Group
6225 North 24th Street
Suite 250
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Project Name: Madison Street Adaptive Re-Use
Subject: Expanded Service Proposal for Plan Review and Inspections
Mr. Smith:
The following is a breakdown of the fees from Willdan to perform the defined services for
the Madison Street Project as discussed. The services have been broken down into three
categories as identified in the table below.
We look forward to continuing to be a resource for you on this project. If you need
additional information, on the scope of services defined herein, please give me a call.
Please note the new number for my desk phone
Roger A Brooks C.B.O.
Deputy Director,
Building Safety
Willdan Engineering
14-,gookt
Celebrating 50 years of
service
1440 East Missouri Ave. Suite C170
Phoenix, AZ 85014
0. (480) 787-5521
F. (602) 870-7601
C. (602) 319-6281
Email: rbrooks@willdan.com
e-mail: Ismithdlraroup.com
Engineering and Planning I Energy Efficiency and Sustainability I Financial and EConomic Constilting I National Preparedness and Interoperability
602.870,7600 I 800.64a3671 I fax 602,870.7601 I 1440 East Missouri Avenue, Suite C170; Phoenix, Arizona 85014-2460 I www.vvilidan.00rn

Pre-design Construetion Construction
forensids. Drawings Administration
$7,000.00 N/A N/A $7,000.00
.CodeAnalysiS;''.. N/A Building Building Building Building $11,250.00
:Fire Protection System Official Official Official Official
Smoke Control System Project Project Project Project
7.ElectricalNechanical, dministration, dministration, Administration, dministration,
Fire, Emergency Power 0 hours @ 5 hours @ 5 hours @ 5 hours @
for Fire Protection $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00
:System ; and other
systems: .:Emergency Plan Check Plan Check Plan Check Plan Check $15,697.50
Egress Engineer, 30 Engineer, 50 Engineer, 50 Engineer, 6.5
hours @ hours @ hours @ hours@
$115.00 $115.00 115.00 $115.00
Plans Plans Plans Plans $17,500.00
Examiner, 40 Examiner, 60 Examiner, 60 Examiner,
hours@ hours@ hours @ 15 hours @
$100.00 $100.00 100.00 $100.00
$10,450.00 $15,500.00 $15,500.00 $2,997.50
Special Inspection *Construction
found in chapter 17
including, high Strength . Professional 0 hours @ $4,400.00
bolting welding engineer: 110.00 Per
inspections, reinforcing t;iour
Steel, post installed
anchors,. spray applied Project 0 hours @ $6,600.00
lire proofing, Manager: *110.00 Per
hour
Project 0 hours @ 4,400.00
Coordinator 110.00 Per
hour
Special 84 hours @ 9,240.00
Inspector $110.00 Per
hour
Welding 00 hours @ $22,000.00
Inspector 110.00 Per
hour
$46,640.00
*Special inspections are intended to be applied throughout the construction phase of the project Total $98,087.50
General inspections for the project will be performed by the building inspection staff from Maricopa County.
Engineering and Pla_nning I Energy Efficiency and Sustainability I Financial and Economic Consulting National Prepatedness and In -temperability
602.870.7600 800.643.3671 I fax: 502.870.7601 I 1440 East Missouri Avenue, Suite C170, Phoenix. Arizona 85014-2460 I WWW.willciart.corn

ATHERTON ENGINEERING, INC.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
May 16, 2016
Larry Smith
DLR Group, Inc.
6225 N. 24th Street
Suite 250
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Re: COUNTY, 4111 AVENUE JAIL CONVERSION
201 WEST MADISON STREET
Dear Larry:
As a result of our meetings and research we have done, I have listed below our scope of work
and the associated fees for Surveying and Civil Engineering to be provided in conjunction with
the conversion of the existing 4 th Avenue jail to an office building.
1. Research previously completed projects in the area. Obtain Utility maps from various
utility companies.
$ 500
2. Ground survey to tie down the existing building including doorways, steps, drive ramps,
visible utilities, walks and walls, perimeter of landscape areas, underground garage
limits. Survey 3rd Avenue to the existing curb line on the west side of the street including
visible utilities. Survey Jackson Street to the existing curb line on the south side of the
street including visible utilities. Survey mechanical yard on the east side of the building
extending to the sally port area of the existing courts building. Survey the mall area on
the north side of the building from 3 rd Avenue to the existing overhead walkway near the
northeast corner of the building. Tie down the location and elevation of the bottom of the
overhead walkway.
Principal Engineer, 40 hours @ $185/1r. $ 7,400
Engineer, 34 hours, @ $150/hr. $ 5,100
Survey Crew, 60 hours @ $150/hr. $ 9,000
$ 21,500
3. Prepare base map using survey information, utility maps and previously prepared plans.
Principal Engineer, 20 hours @ $185/hr. $ 3,700
Engineer, 31 hours, @ $150/hr. $ 4,650
CADD, 60 hours @ $110/hr. $ 6,600
Clerical, 11 hours @ $50/hr. $ 550
$ 15,500
1203 E. Meadowbrook Avenue • Phoenix, Arizona 85014-4028 • Phone 602-279-7331 • Fax 602-230-1908

Page 2 of 3
4. Camera existing utilities, i.e. storm water and sewer lines.
$ 4,500
5. Hire locating service to locate the existing utilities in the area of the new utility
connections.
$ 4,500
6. Prepare demolition plan addressing Civil items.
Principal Engineer, 4 hours @ $185/hr. $ 740
Engineer, 5 hours, @ $150/hr. $ 750
CADD, 10 hours @ $110/hr. $ 1,100
Clerical, 2 hours @ $50/hr. $ 100
$ 2,690
S.D. phase @ 15% $ 403.50
D.D. phase @ 15% $ 403.50
C.D. phase @ 55% $ 1,479.50
BID phase @ 5% $ 134.50
C.A. phase @ 5% $ 134.50
AS-BUILT phase @ 5% $ 134.50
$ 2,690.00
7. Prepare Grading and Drainage plan showing the new routing of the buses along the east
side of the existing building.
Principal Engineer, 14 hours @ $185/hr. 2,590
Engineer, 15 hours, @ $150/hr. 2,250
CADD, 21 hours @ $110/hr. 2,310
Clerical, 7 hours @ $50/hr. 350
7,500
S.D. phase @ 15% 1,125.00
D.D. phase @ 15% 1,125.00
C.D. phase @ 55% 4,125.00
BID phase @ 5% 375.00
C.A. phase @ 5% 375.00
AS-BUILT phase @ 5% 375.00
7,500.00
8. Prepare Grading and Drainage plan and Site Utility plan showing the new connection
from the building to the mall, new water, sewer and fire connections to the building and
connection to the existing NRG chilled water lines in the mall area.
Principal Engineer, 20 hours @ $185/hr. $ 3,700
Engineer, 21 hours, @ $150/hr. $ 3,150
CADD, 30 hours @ $110/hr. $ 3,300
Clerical, 7 hours @ $50/hr. $ 350
$ 10,500

Page 3 of 3
S.D. phase @ 15% $ 1,575.00
D.D. phase @ 15% $ 1,575.00
C.D. phase @ 55% $ 5,775.00
BID phase @ 5% $ 525.00
C.A. phase @ 5% $ 525.00
AS-BUILT phase @ 5% $ 525.00
$ 10,500.00
Total $ 67,190
Please review this proposal and give me a call if you have any questions. Thanks for your
interest in our firm and we look forward to working with you on this project.
Sincerely,
ATHERTON ENGINEERING, INC.
Robert B. Atherton, P.E., R.L.S.

,
,j Laser Scanning & 3d Modeling Quotation
i•
Company: DLR Group Date of Quote: 2.17.16
• Contact: Larry Smith Jobsite/Project Name: Madison Street Jail
Eco, Street: 6225 North 24th Street ft250 Street: 225 West Madison
City/State/Zip: Phoenix AZ 85016 City/State/Zip: Phoenix AZ
Capture Create Consult Office Phone: 602.391.8580 Site Contact: TBD
Phone: n/a
• 5011 East iliShirigtOri St 31170
Phoenix, AZ 85034 Eco 3d Quote Number: 1019-21716-E
www.eco3dusa.com Valid Timeframe: 90 days
• ken@eco3dusa.com Estimated Start Date: TBD
cell 480.510.1049 Estimated Completion Date: TBD
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE WORK TO BE INCLUDED:
Section 1: Scope
» Laser Scanning—Point Cloud Creation
• laser scan existing interior area of approximately 252,000 SF; with an option to scan rooftop and exterior elevations
• measure to within 1 ppt (parts per thousand) all exposed structural, MEP, and architectural elements
• scan data does not include closets, interstitial spaces, elevator shafts, etc.--or areas that are considered non-habitable
• laser scan to capture all visible elements within scope equal to or greater than 1"
» 3d Model Option
• 3d Revit model is included as an option
• 3d Revit model of architectural, structural, and MEP elements will be to specifications as outlined in Eco3d Suggested Model Standards (see attached)
• all elements within scope larger than 15" will be included in the model
• client agrees to inform Eco3d of any pre-existing 3d model in advance of initial mobilization to ensure data is usable for existing model
Section 2: Pricing
• quotation is a 'guaranteed maximum price' based upon scope as provided; includes post scan processing; and mobilization
Section 3: Process
• typical workflow is as follows
* formal award of contract is received and Eco3d assigns a qualified Project Manager to oversee project from start to finish
* pre-planning meeting is set-up with a formalized agenda for all parties—and may include additional stakeholders from DLR Group who have project interest
* Project Performance Pion is established that has corresponding "check-in" milestone accomplishment dates, and includes delivery times
* scan teams are deployed to site with full PPE and any other equipment necessary to complete laser scanning
* Eco3d establishes a control network for real-time QA/QC during the laser scanning process
* scan teams are overseen by on-site working Project Manager and a written QA/QC plan is followed
* data is registered with corresponding QA/QC checks
* throughout the deliverable creation the project is tracked to monitor quality output—and DLR Group can examine reports/examples
* upon completion of the deliverable—a Project Turnover Document is created to review what was completed and to document Eco3d performance to plan
* deliverable is sent to client and reviewed thoroughly to ensure client satisfaction
Section 4: "WHY" Eco3d
• key considerations
* 100% of this project scope will be completed by full-time employees of Eco3d (no other provider can offer that and meet deadlines without outsourcing)
* Eco3d will attend in person additional interviews or site walks if required at no charge
* no part of this project will be done with a 'joint venture' partnership/subsidiary/parent corporation employees
* Eco3d is uniquely qualified to provide on-going assistance in data capture; training; consultation with DLR Group and other architects/engineers/contractors on site
* all scan data and models are considered confidential and will not be provided to others or resold in the open market
* Eco3d has completed more than 1.8 million scans and been in business for 7 years--exclusively as a service provider
* Project Planning Document and Turnover Document hold us accountable throughout the process and to an end deliverable
* No other service provider offers our insurance coverage amounts—thereby providing risk mitigation for DLR Group
Page 1 of 4

Section 5: Miscellaneous
• survey control, if required, to be provided by others
• access to all rooftops, bridges, etc. to be provided by others
• exterior elevations that are not visible to laser scanning will be modelled with a generic block shape constructed as a best fit wall/dimension
• if unable to complete scanning on date agreed to by all parties, an additional $1,500 per day mobilization expense will be applied
• includes a90 day unlimited consultation for signatory client (only)
• consultation provided after 90 days to signatory client or any other will be billed hourly at published labor rate
• scanning to be completed during normal business hours
• Eco3d requires a fee in advance of services provided of 30% of the total contract value on all projects greater than $20,000 in value
• ALL scope--laser scanning and 3d modeling--is done in the United States by Eco3d employees and will not be outsourced to other companies or foreign nations
examples of 3d models
Deliverable Description
point doud in CAD and/or Revit compatible le type
Interior Area
Phase 1 interior area floors 1,2,4 12,465.00
Phase 2 interior area of floor 3 4,155.00
Phase 3 interior area of floor 5 4,155.00
Phase 4 interior area of floor 6 4,155.00
Exterior rooftops 9,330.00
Exterior elevation 8,350.00
3d Revit model
Interior area 22,120.00
Exterior rooftops & elevations 5,220.00
total for all options—point cloud data and 3d model 69,950.00
Page 3 of 4

Pricing Detail
SCOPE 1
interior area hourly rates allocated hours totals
laser scanning $ 150.00 49.86 2,479
office processing 90.00 166.2 14,958
project management 175.00 14.25 2,494
24,931
exterior rooftops
laser scanning 150.00 18.66 2 799
office processing 90.00 62.2 5,598
. project management 175.00 5.33 933
9,330
exterior elevation
laser scanning 150.00 16.7 2,505
office processing 90.00 55.67 = 5,010
project management 175.00 4.77 835
8,350
SCOPE Z
interior area hourly rates allocated hours totals
laser scanning 150.00
office processing 90.00 221.2 19,908
project management 175.00 12.64 2,212
22,120
exterior rooftop and elevations
laser scanning ' 150.00
office processing 90.00 52 2 4,698
project management 175.00 298 522
5,220
Notes:
Eco3d will reduce reimbursable expenses to what is only allowed by prime contract. Which is only travel for out of state consultants. No printing, no communications, no in
state travel exp. or meals. Client contract is based on all expenses being in your overhead. Any client required printing will be done by the clients print shop. All other
communications and docs are electronic. Any expenses not allowed by the prime contract will not be paid. See prime agreement article 2.4 and 6.2.4.
Terrns & Conditions
• Customer/Signee agrees to release, waive, discharge and take any form of legal action against Eco3d LLC, agents, owners, and employees from any and all liability,
claims, demands, actions and causes of action whatsoever arising out of or related scan data provided, loss, damage, or injury, including death, that may be sustained by customer,
or to any property belonging to customer, whether caused by the negligence of parties listed, or otherwise, while participating in scanning activity, or while in, on or upon the premises
where the activity is being conducted or In transportation to and from said premises.
• Customer agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Eco3d LLC, agents, owners, and employees from any loss, liability, damage or costs, including all legal expenses
including attomey's fees, that may incur due to my participation in said activity, whether caused by negligence or otherwise.
• Eco3d LLC is not a survey or engineering company. Any need for those services will be subcontracted to licensed professionals.
• Payment IN FULL is due upon receipt of deliverable product supplied by Eco 3,1 LLC In any computer file format or hard copy.
Page 3 of 4

Addendum to Terms and Conditions
This QUOTATION ADDENDUM (the "Addendum") is made by ECO3D, L.L.C., an Arkansas limited liability company ("Company") in connection with Laser Scanning & 3d
Modeling Quotation number: 1019-21716-E Dated 2.17.16 provided to Customer (the "Quote"). The following additional terms are added to the Quote:
Additional Expenses. In the event any data is incorrectly collected by Company during the initial visit to the premises due to Company's error, Company is responsible for all expenses
associated with Company's re-collection of the data required to satisfy Section 1 of the Quote.
Quality Control. Company is responsible for the accuracy and quality of the data provided to Customer in the final deliverable package, as set forth in the Quote.
Indemnification. Company will indemnify Customer for any damages Customer incurs due to Company's actions on the premises during Company's data collection process pursuant to
the Quote. As used herein, the term "damages" does not include any Customer downtime or production stoppages due to Company's normal scanning process.
Limitation. Eco3d LLC shall not be responsible for any errors, edits or problems caused by any third party contractor or by Customer. In addition, Eco3d LLC's liability, including, but not
limited to, Customer's claims of contributions and indemnification related to third party claims arising out of services rendered by Eco3d, and for any losses, injury or damages to
persons or properties or work performed arising out of or In connection with the services rendered and for any other claim, shall be limited to the payment received by Eco3d LLC from
Customer for the particular service that gave rise to the claim. Eco3d LLC shall not be liable for any special, indirect, consequential, lost profits, or punitive damages. The limitation of
liability set forth herein is for any and all matters for which the Company may otherwise have liability arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, whether the claim arises in
contract, tort, statute, or otherwise.
Remedy. Upon receipt of written notice from Customer detailing the nature of the claim, Customer's exclusive remedy for any claim arising out of or relating to the services provided by
Eco3d LLC shall he, at Eco3d LLC's sole discretion, for Eco3d LLC to, either (I) use commercially reasonable efforts to cure, at its expense, the matter that gave rise to the claim, or
(ii) return to Customer the fees paid by Customer to Eco3d LLC for the particular service provided that gives rise to the claim. Customer agrees that this remedy is appropriate given
the nature of the services.
Indemnity. Customer shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Eco3d LLC from and against any and all claims, actions, causes of action, demands, or liabilities of whatsoever kind
and nature, including judgments, interest, post judgment collection costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and all other costs, fees, expenses and charges asserted by any third party
against Eco3d LLC in connection with the services provided by Eco3d LLC and/or the time spent by Eco3d LLC on the premises conducting the services.
Assignment. The services to be provided hereunder are not assignable or transferable by Customer without the written consent of Eco3d LLC, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
Changes. If Customer desires any change to the scope of services, the request shall be discussed with Ec,o3d LLC and any agreed upon changes will be in writing in a change order
signed by both Parties.
Force Majeure. Eco3d LLC shall not be responsible for delays or failures in providing the services if such delay arises out of causes beyond its control. Such causes may include, but
are not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, floods, epidemics, riots, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, earthquakes, electrical outages, computer or
communications failures, and severe weather, and acts or omissions of subcontractors or third parties.
Other Contractors. Eco3d LLC is not a survey or engineering company. Any need for those services will be subcontracted to licensed professionals.
Payment Due Upon Delivery. Payment IN FULL is due upon receipt of deliverable product supplied by Eco3d LLC in any computer file format or hard copy.
Goveminq Law. This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona without regard to conflict of law principles. The Parties hereto
irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of any state or federal court in Maricopa County, Arizona with respect to any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement.
Acceptance: The Customer, by accepting this quote, agrees to all of the terms and conditions specified herein, and on all attachments hereto.
Customer Signature; Printed Name; & Job Title Date
Page 4 of 4

1,----p
2019 .L.N.E.I.PC.c..1..4.11.11.0.1..MAril .
I
m.o....kn.....
6121-.1..M.URILI...A.4...1AMI...5.8.0...1.2..c.t
Deadline Progress
i...
Mar xixiiiiimiximxivix•••xix IsixI•
I
Feb
2018 I Jari C 3
Rollup
Dec
1 Summary
1Nov
C2ct Manual Start-only Finish-only
JuliNigilapt
IlligailetiA .I=i1;;;ILIIZZIII;
Mayfly] O
I
Ap.r..
Mari Milestone Summary 1
1 Task Page
Feb i Duration-only
2017 Jan Ir.....................w Inactive Inactive Manual
lip.....pp
Dec i
I Nov il.W.14.10760:645060.0501iGeSOMOMMAISSOSaillp
1 V.i.i..........ce;
Oct . MIRIONIM11011111111{11811•111•11.4. xiosiaWriiWili
i A i...
......111y1Sepl.
I .1 .
PrediResoul Name: Summary Tasks Milestone Task
Project External External Inactive
7/2.8/16 9/22/16 12/2116 11/4/16 11/18/16 2/17/17 6/1/17 3/31/17 3/9/17 6/1/17 10/27/17 1/18/19 3/15/19
;Finish I . :Thu Thu Fri :Fri :Fri Fri : :Thu !Fri : . Thu Thu Fri Fri :Fri Kffigffilil
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
7/1/16 7/28/16 7/29/16 9/12/16 8/1/16 1.1/7/16 7/1/16 9/23/16 2/20/17 1/21/19 • gioxi
11/28116 :11/21/16 ;10/30/17
iStart I 1Fri 'Thu ;Fri :Mon Mon : ;Mon Mon , :Mon TO :Fri Mon Mon Mon
Duration days days days days days days days days days days days days days
20 40 91 40 ;80 60 149 95 : :180 180 180 120 40
Milestone Summary
Package Package Plant Task Split
Pre-Design Bid Bid Central System Systems Documents Building
/ Design Design Design Development Building of of Adaptive_Reuse
Plant Distribution CenturyLink Construction
Name Contracts Programming 0 Schematic B Demolition A C B Demolition A Construction C C / C Construction B Construction B B Madison 6/16/16
Task Phase Phase Phase Central Phase Design Phase Phase Phase NRG Phase APS Phase Phase Phase Post Phase
Thu
D 1 4 17 30 37 48 56 68 77 82 30 103 123 Project: Date:

BE
FebiRE
I2019 d
71
Miriti.25.110.27.0
• GM
Deadline Progress
Ap rIri ...........:=.
INP.........../
Rollup 1C 3
2018
b Summary
Summary
Manual Manual Start-only
—c
,'---- riiiiii
0
Milestone Summary Pagel
iFebIM Task
Duration-only
2017 Inactive Inactive Manual
.
DLR FMD
TBD
DLR DLR DIR •TII..........IIIV 5''"' .--_________J
O Atherton FMD/DLR DLR dan R LR DLR DLR
M. hFMD/DLR FMD/DLR TBD W DLR •
LfMD,R 7/28 /28 ,--...--, MD,DLR FMD DI-11 i.-FM0
i i : D, " 1 .1 •
PrediResoul Name FMD, :FMD iFMD Atha FM FMD :DLR FMD/1 :FMD :FMD4 TBD .FMI)/i DLR • .. !DLR :DLR 'Wind; DLR iDLR DLR DLR ,DLR :DIA TBD :DLR IFMD :DLR :DLR :DI.R :TBD Summary Tasks Milestone
. , . . , . Task
2 3 3 5 7 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 . 3 18 12 18 16 16 16 26 27 28 19 20 16 33
Project External External Inactive
7/28/16 7/28/16 7/28/16 9/22/16 7/28/16 9/22/16 16 29 8/3/16 8/12/16 8/15/16 8/18/16 8/19/16 9/2/16 9/6/16 9/15/16 9/22/16 12/2/16 . .. 9/1/16 9/29/16 9/9/16 9/15/16 10/27/1616 9/26/16 9/29/16 10/6/16 10/26/1E24 11/9/16 11/25/16 12/2/16 11/4/16 10/20/16 9/23/16 10/13/16 10/20/16 88 W
7 .. 81118
Finish I Thu :Thu Thu iThu IThu Thu • :F Wed !Fri :Mon Thu :Fri ;Fri Tue Thu :Thu :Fri , , Thu . iThu ;Fri Thu Thu :Mon Thu Thu Wed Wed Fri Fri Fri Thu Fri Thu • Thu ligiiiiiiiMMINISinit $ 08 88
. 8 e
7/1/16 7/1/16 7/28/16 7/28/16 7/28/16 7/29/16 8/1/16 8/1/16 8/15/16 8/16/16 8/19/16 8/22/16 9/5/16 9/7/16 9/16/16 7/29/16 7/29/16 9/2/16 8/22/16 9/2/16 9/23/16 9/23/16 9/23/16 9/23/16 9/30/16 10/27/16 11/10/16 11/28/1 9/12/16 9/30/16 9/12/16 9/23/16 10/14/16 ie. ,,,,,, • 1111
Start Fri Fri Thu Thu Thu Fri Fri Mon Mon Mon Tue Fri Mon Mon Wed Fri Fri . „ Fri Fri Mon Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Thu Thu 1Mon :1Vion Fri :Mon Fri :Fri
• . :
Duration days days days days days days day days days day days day days days days days days „. . days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days
20 20 0 40 :0 :40 1 3 10 :1 :3 1 i10 12 7 ;5 '91 . , 25 ,20 15 f10 25 2 5 10 '19 '10 12 5 40 :15 10 :15 5
. Milestone Summary
Contracts 1 FMD 2 Criteria Package Design Task Spilt
from Workshop Phase Structural Study Pack
Group Pre-Design FMD Workshop Workshop Program Model Remediation Fit-up Bid Remediation Req. Bid .
Proceed / Survey Updates Space Design / Reconciliation Pre-Design Design Building Model Package Design Design Design Efficiency Package Design M,P,E,FP Demo, Adaptive_Reuse
DLR To Program Estimate Approval Analysis Estimate Approval Estimate
Name Execute Notice Programming B Space Civil ....Programming Program Fit Programming Finalize Concept Cost Costing Finalize FMD Schematic B Existing Analysis Structural Analysis Code Demolition Schematic Exterior Interior Energy Costing Cost Report FMD Demolition A Structural Define Prepare Cost Madison 6/16/16
Task Contracts Phase Site Test Phase SD SD Phase
Thu
1 2 5 6 _ 7 --a- 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 —30 31 32 33 34 Project: Date:
ID .

, I
Febi_Mar
2019 I Jan
I
Dec
Nov .44.,............•
Oct I -8
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun Deadline Progress
Apr.jMayj
I Mar 4=4,==•••=.4•444 iipII••••
1Feb 3
2018 Jan Rollup'
Dec
Summary Summary
Octiklov
I Manual Manual Start-only Finish-only
Au.giSep
I
Jul I :======,,,i,i Waii&resithii&
Jun TBD o3D rem 6/1
Mayl E • 0
I thor le" BD
Mar FMD Milestone Summary 2
I TFMD/DLR Task Page
Feb I ID/DLR FMD/DLR IrigioLit Duration-only
2017 Jan ligg.TBD Inactive Inactive Manual
IpINSIMMULIMIF Ziggig-4,DLR r 1 FMD 12/9
Dec &D FMD ri1:28 ¶ 1
Nov P& P& D r ii.lieistettsswatca
f DL TE 9...............V i--------
Oct I • LR R MD
blp • FMD/D MD/DLR TBD D F 9
Aux • DLR
I 1 ; i . 716- I . F 1 1 1 i I • - : I i I
Resoul Name: P&D P&D FMD ;DLIR :FMD/ TBD DLR FMD DLR TBD 1P&D ]P&D DLR :FMD)1 :FMDA TBD 'FIND DLR :FMD FMD FMD 'FMD iiii6' :TBD Eco3; :DLR ;FMDA Summary Tasks Milestone
' ' : .. Task
Pred 33 35 7 7 7 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 frig 50 50 ;52 '52 1.54 j 136 58 59 'ed 76 76 60 60 61 66
12/28/1E28 11/28/1E57 .. . Project External External Inactive
11/3/16 11/4/16 11/18/16 8/12/16 8/12/16 8/5/16 8/26/16 9/9/16 9/15/16 10/13/16 10/20/16 11/17/16 11/18/16 2/17/17 12/30/16 1/2/17 1/20/17 1/24/17 2/10/17 2/17/17 6/1/17 11/25/16 12/9/16 12/9/16 5/2/1 5/5/17 4/21/17 3/31/17 5/12/17 6/1/17 6/1/17
!Finish Thu Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Thu Thu Thu Thu Fri Fri Wed Fri Mon Fri Tue Fri Fri Thu Fri Mon Fri :Fri iFri ;Fri Fri IThu ;Thu
I I • 12/11/16Thu IiiiiialiMa61165111 •II••••••
10/14/16 11/4/16 8/1/16 8/1/16 8/1/16 8/1/16 8/15/16 8/29/16 9/12/16 9/16/16 10/14/16 10/21/16 11/18/16 11/28/1E 12/29/16 1/2/17 1/2/17 1/23/17 1/23/17 2/13/17 11/7/16 11/7/16 11/28/1 11/28/1E 12/9/16 4/3/17 4/3/17 12/12/16 12/12/1EFri 5/26/17 6/1/17
11/28/16 •
IStart Fri Fri Mon Mon 'Mon Mon Mon Mon •Mon Fri Fri Fri Fri Mon Mon Thu Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon 1Mon Fri Mon Mon iMon Mon ;Mon yFri Thu
I i
Duration days day days days days days days days days days days days day days days days day days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days
15 1 80 10 10 5 10 10 4 20 5 20 1 60 23 2 1 15 2 15 5 149 15 0 10 0 . 119 25 15 80 110 5 0
........ Milestone Summary
Package APS, Task Split
Design Work Towers Boilers
Bid NRG, Design Specs Update
P&D Design with Preliminary Calculations Plant Design & Update D & Session Cost Report Proceed Demolition Cooling Steam Work Completion
Approval & Strategies Estimate of Plans P Approval Development Drawings Work Strategies of Reconciliation & Approval Building of Completion Madison_Adaptive_Reuse
Review Plant Central CD Estimate Review DDs Period Received To Scanning
Name Plan Permit C Coordination CenturyLink Develop Drawings Phasing Cost Final Report Approval 100% Cost Plan Permit B Design Review Phasing Estimate Cost Final FMD Demolition A Bids Contracts Notice Building Demolition Demolition Abatement Substantial Final 6/16/16
Task Central Phase Design Phase Phase Bid 3D
.... Thu
35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 _.._60 ... . ii 62 63 64 65 66 67 Project: Date:
D

2019
i
14.91AILLNIR.1.3.9.0.1-Pgit.19.Y.LQ9SIJAILIERRIMArli Iii.S.GMRIGIRIGV.M.
4
Deadline Progress
xixiiixii.xxixxxxii..... RP•••••=.
2018 C 3
Rollup
M4Y1-40--D9LIA9RIARRLPSLIA9Y.I.PRRIAILI.E.9.9.1.NINIAPLI...MRY.1.2. Summary Summary
47.17.131, Manual Manual Start-only Finish-only
,-iiiiiiiol :::::;"
FMD/DLR FMD/DLR ... .::::
7====iiiiCi --
DLR lislieD I riiiiiklissim- .;::::::;:::::::
-V DLit 0
I LR 3/31 3 FMD /7
_Ivl_a_riApr NRG . •• la ,1-1,77-,1
NRG wiz liVii=013. .- 7 i Milestone Summary Task 3 Page
1.101Feb FMD RAD 1 . Duration-only
2017 Inactive Inactive Manual
FMD 412/19 ".
LP-RS], , -h., ,
Ociitio toNiiiKiiaNRG ,„,...,APS,D1R .., , ...4 ltlill V.i.............CP '"""'iii""'"'"''""'"1 .....
Sep I -.. 4
I *151-4,FMD
Aug
i 1 1 ' I I I i . I i . i i . i 1 1 , 1 I I ,
Resoul Namet FMD FMD 'FMD GC DLR .FMD4 NRG FMD 'NRG NRG NRG APS4 APS FMD APS TMD APS,F1 APS •LR DLR TBD FMDA :FMDA Summary Tasks Milestone
i Task
Pred 47 70 71 72 73 74 75 79 80 16 83 83 84 86 87 88 55 91 92 93 94
12/19/1E69 11/17/1678 Project External External Inactive
3/31/17 12/16/16 1/6/17 1/6/17 3/24/17 3/31/17 3/31/17 3/31/17 3/9/17 8/25/16 2/9/17 3/9/17 6/1/17 10/20/16 1/12/17 1/12/17 2/9/17 4/6/17 4/7/17 6/1/17 10/27/17 5/12/17 5/19/17 6/9/17 6/16/17 6/19/17
'Finish i ! Fri : Fri Mon Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Thu Thu Thu Thu Thu Thu Thu Thu Thu Thu Thu Fri Thu Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Mon ..,,,,.......,..
lioIi.
11/21/1E 12/19/16 12/19/1EFri 1/6/17 1/9/17 3/27/17 3/31/17 3/31/17 7/1/16 7/1/16 8/26/16 11/18/16 2/10/17 9/23/16 9/23/16 10/21/16 10/21/16 1/13/17 2/10/17 4/7/17 4/7/17 2/20/17 2/20/17 5/15/17 5/22/17 6/12/17 6/19/17 Illiti ttttttt .. •
11/21/16
iStart i Mon Mon Mon Mon Fri Mon Mon Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon
Duration days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days day
95 20 0 15 0 55 5 0 0 180 40 60 60 20 180 '20 :60 60 20 :40 0 40 .180 60 .5 .15 5 .1
Tower Milestone Summary
Plant Plant to Contracts Plant Circuits Complete Task Split
Central Over System Distribution Permits System Central Systems Systems 911/CentryLink & Courts
Central Completion Switch NRG & Meetings Meter Work Work Documents Session
of Proceed of / for CenturyLink Coordination West
Received to Completion Courts Distribution FMD Finalize Design Distribution Ready Over CenturyLink Office Courts Power Power Drawings Due Estimate Reconciliation Work Madison_Adaptive_Reuse
Name Construction C Period Contracts Notice Construction Substantial C Execute System Construction Switch C Coordination / Planning Sheriffs Equip. Consolidation Primary Energize Primary Construction B Design CDs Review 6/16/16
Phase Bid Bids Final West NRG NRG Phase NRG NRG NRG / Phase APS West De Phase 50% Cost Cost
Task APS Thu
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Project: Date:
ID ..

-.
FMD/D1. 1/18 _
12019 GC LR
-
-- gam= ROGIM.02117Milii9.72
4
.1..M.P.d.h.P.d.1YRY.12140...D9LIAthePIP.F.thl9.Y..152.eSikraf.e.d.Mar.f.
CC
5c Deadline Progress
-,--------- ka..FMD/D1.11 .4/27 -,i„,„,4
v
GC
.........................
. MD 1/19 -----
2018 .4.0...11.e.9 , F : : C 3
FMD I.R /DL 41.24 Rollup
FM0/. • FM FM
DLR P&D . Summary Summary
P&L)
P&D DLR Manual Manual Start-only
An..1....M...i.Aggi.§.M.L.PstiNRY.1.2n
," -I
FIVID -•----,
DLR
: 1 C="=:::-------:‘
-- ::: r-
Milestone Summary 4
Task Page
Duration-only
2017 Inactive Inactive Manual
_IALIg.i.§.s.P.L.Q.ctilliViPss....4gnif.01..M.ArlAirikLa —1
61?"......":a.-c*: "iiiiiiiiiiiii&i:
4 I
I I I 1 1 1 ; I , I 1 1 I I : i• I i I
Resoui Namei DLR FMD1 P&O ,DLR P&D DLR P&D 'FMD :FMDA :FMD FMDA FMD •FMD :FM0 GC GC GC .FMDA :FMD GC GC :DLR :FMD) FMD/ Summary Milestone
. , Tasks Task
Fred 92 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 102 105 106 104 108 109 110 110 110 114 115 116 117 118 112 121 121 121
Project Extemat External Inactive
"FT.16/30/17 7/7/17 9/1/17 9/15/17 10/6/17 10/20/17 10/27/17 1/18/19 12/15/17 11/10/17 11/17/17 11/24/17 12/15/17 1/19/18 1/19/18 . 3/16/18 12/21/18 6/29/18 2/2/18 4/13/18 4/27/18 4/27/18 5/18/18 6/29/18 12/12/1E 1/18/19 1/18/19 3/15/19 2/15/19 3/15/19
iFinish Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri .Fri :Fri . Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Wed Fri Fri Fri Fri
iiitiVERMININIIII .mm1,111.11,1..14 iiim•••I•I•••
5/22/17 7/3/17 7/10/17 9/4/17 9/18/17 10/9/17 10/23/1/Fri 10/30/17Fri 10/30/17Fri 11/20/17Fri 12/15/17 12/18/17Fri 1/22/18 1/22/18 1/22/18 1/22/18 2/5/18 4/16/18 4/30/18 5/21/18 11/1/18 12/24/1EFri 1/21/19 1/21/19 1/21/19
1/19/18 4/27/18 1/18/19 •
!Start :Mon Mon :Mon :Mon Mon Mon :Mon 10/30/17 ;Mon :Mon !Mon 41/13/17 :Mon Fri Mon ;Fri ,Mon !Mon :Mon Mon Mon :Mon :Fri Mon :Mon :Thu Mon :Fri Mon :Mon Mon
1 : :
Duration days days days days days days days:Mon days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days
30 5 40 10 15 10 5 320 35 .10 5 :5 0 25 .0 .40 240 115 10 50 :10 .0 .15 130 ;30 20 10 40 20 40
for Route Milestone Summary
P&D inspection Yard Task Spa
Check Building Routing East Exit Demolition Construction
&D Comments CDs Permit Building Site Work Staging of Substantial Bus HVAC Completion Documents
Due P Back of Bid Proceed Demo of Egress Busses Courts Mall Mall Documents
CDs Approval Review Review Review Ready for Addendum Pre Addendum Received to Bus Yard Construction Yard Completion Commissioning Completion Construction Out Madlson_Adaptive_Reuse
Name 100% Permit Approval Construction 8 Period Bidders Contracts Notice Selective Construction Courts East Courts East Switch Madison Madison Substantial B Built 6/16/16
FMD Plan Plan Plan Phase Bid First Last Bids Final Phase Close As
Task Post Thu
96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 Project: Date:
ID

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
EXHIBIT 'C': Record Drawing Procedures
Introduction
These guidelines are issued to promote the development of electronic drawings suitable for use in the
Maricopa County Facilities Management Department CAD environment. Consistency and compatibility
with existing Maricopa County documents can only be achieved when these standards are strictly
adhered to. Electronic drawings produced and submitted in accordance with these standards have
significantly greater value to Maricopa County. Design Professionals (DP), their Subconsultants, and
Contractors delivering documentation to Maricopa County must ensure these standards are reviewed,
understood and followed by those people responsible for preparing electronic drawings.
Renovations and Space Change Projects Requirements
For typical Renovation and Space Planning projects, the DP is responsible for submitting a complete set
of Construction Documents (CDs) to Maricopa County prior to the beginning of construction. Upon
completion of construction, Contractors are responsible for submitting complete As-Built documentation
(per definitions included in the Agreement Between The County of Maricopa, Arizona and Design
Professional) to the Owner (in both electronic and hardcopy formats) and DP is responsible for submitting
the Record Drawings to the Owner based on this As-Built documentation. Construction Documents and
Record Drawings submitted to the Owner need to adhere the criteria outlined in this document.
All "DWG" files and AutoCAD drawing entities submitted at the end of a project must be able to be
manipulated using standard AutoCAD drafting procedures. Non-compliance with this policy may result in
the rejection of AutoCAD files submitted at project closeout, in addition to delayed rendering of final
project payment. "DXF" files will not be accepted at project closeout as a substitution for "DWG" AutoCAD
file deliverables. Projects using Building Information Modeling (BIM) software are still required to
submit "DWG" formats for their projects.
Electronic File Format
CAD drawings must be submitted in full compliance with AutoCAD software 2007 drawing file format (file
extension = .DWG).
All Construction and Record Document project drawings must be submitted to Maricopa County Facilities
Management Department in all file formats listed below; other formats are not acceptable without the prior
consent of Maricopa County Facilities Management Department.
• AutoCAD® 2007 or higher — DWG format only.
• Adobe® PDF version 6.0 or higher.
Scale, Units, Coordinate System and Orientation
AutoCAD drawings should be drafted at full scale in architectural or engineering units, such that one
drawing unit equals one inch. The User Coordinate System (UCS) for all AutoCAD drawings should be
set to "World".
Tolerances
When projects require creation of new AutoCAD floor plans from field measurements, exterior building
dimensions should reconcile to within one (1) inch of actual building dimensions as measured in the field.
interior building dimensions must reconcile to within half (1/2) inch of actual field dimensions. However,
individual project requirements may vary. Please confirm requirements with the Project Manager
designated by Maricopa County.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page f 41
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

Maricopa County
Facilities Management Department
Blocks
The following rules must be employed when handling block entities:
1. All entities within a block must be created on layer 0.
2. Drawing entities translated into AutoCAD blocks from non-AutoCAD systems must revert to
layer 0 when exploded within AutoCAD.
Policy on External Reference Files (XREFs)
Maricopa County will not accept the submission of any AutoCAD drawing deliverable which contains
unbound references to external source drawing files. All externally referenced data sources that were
used during the AutoCAD drawing production phase should be incorporated as a block within a single
drawing file, including the title block and all identifying information visible in the printed image, upon
project completion and prior to submission to Maricopa County. Layers contained in XREF's inserted as
blocks should conform to Maricopa County guidelines. The resulting self-contained drawing file is an
acceptable deliverable to Maricopa County.
Owner Supplied CAD Files
Prior to commencement of design and construction services, Maricopa County will provide past Record
Drawings in AutoCAD per the Contract Agreement that can be used as the background for space
documentation projects. These have been generated using a variety of methods and may require field
verification. When no pre-existing Record Drawings in AutoCAD are available, consultants will be
required to produce drawings entirely from field measurements. AutoCAD files are transmitted for the
convenience and expediency of the DP, their Subconsultants and the Contractor but bear no implicit or
explicit guarantee of accuracy, reliability or correctness". It is recommended to all recipients of Owner-
supplied drawing files to perform their own verifications as necessary to develop drawings for each phase
of the project.
Layers for CAD Files
All AutoCAD Files shall include but not be limited to the following building features that define the physical
boundaries necessary to define space, such as: 1) exterior walls; 2) vertical elevations & sections; 3)
details; 4) schedules; 5) doors; 6) glazing; 7) elevator shafts; 8) stair wells and other changes in floor
elevation; 9) built-in furniture and/or modular systems. The DP, their Subconsultants and the Contractor
shall adhere to these layer standards as much as possible, although additional layers, conforming to
standard formats, may be necessary, while some layers may not be applicable to every space
documentation project (furniture, roof lines, etc.).
AutoCAD layers should be named in accordance with the latest U.S. National CAD Standard (NCS) which
can be obtained from the National Institute of Building Sciences. Custom layers added by Maricopa
County begin with MC-. The specific name of custom layers may vary slightly by Maricopa County owner.
AIA CAD Layer Guidelines
See U.S. National CAD Standard Version 3 (attached).
USE OF BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM)
Although projects may utilize Building Information Modeling (BIM) for conveying three-dimensional
design, two-dimensional deliverables are still required as outlined in this guideline and as specified in
Maricopa County Agreements with the DP, their Subconsultants and Contractors.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page 142
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

BIM Execution Plan
Projects utilizing BIM are required to provide a BIM Execution Plan to document modeling practices. This
document declares what is being modeled, the accuracy of the models, the intent of the models, and how
project teams work within the models.
BIM Standards
Modeling practices and standards should be declared and agreed upon in the Project's BIM Execution
Plan.
BIM Models and Deliverables
Models turned over to Maricopa County as a deliverable must meet the requirements of the agreed upon
BIM Execution Plan.
Use of Revit
Models are to be created in the most current version of Autodesk Revit. Modeling practices are to be
declared in the project's BIM Execution Plan.
Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph2) Page 43
DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 16022-RFQ

--- 7@ DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
A CCU? EP CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on
this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER UNICO Group, Inc. CONTACT NAME: UNICO Group, Inc.
1128 Lincoln Mall PHONE (A/C. No. Ext): 402-434-7200 (ac, No): 402-434-7272
Suite 200 E-MAIL
Lincoln, NE 68508 ADDRESS:
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
INSURER A: Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company 25615
INSURED INSURER B :
Phoenix - DLR Grou_p inc.
6225 No 24 Street, Suite 250 INSURER C: Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America 25674
Phoenix AZ 85016-2020 INSURER D: Travelers Indemnity Company 25685
INSURER E: The Phoenix Insurance Co. 19046
INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 30615168 REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSD SUER WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFF (MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EXP LIMITS
A i COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 630-9185N623-00E-15 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
CLAIMS-MADE I OCCUR DAMAGE PREMISES TO (Ea RENTED occurrence) $ 300,000
MED EXP (Any one person) $ 10,000
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000
GE 'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000
POLICY .4 jta- I LO. PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGO $ 2,000,000
OTHER: $
E AU OMOBILE LIABILITY 810-9185N623-PHX-15 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 Fea Ma I LIN creDniSINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000
i ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
AUTOS OWNED ONLY AUTOS SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
HIRED 111111 I NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident)
$
C i UMBRELLA LIAB i OCCUR CUP-9185N623-TIL-15 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000&
EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000
DED I RETENT ON $10,000 $
D WORKERS COMPENSATION UB-9185N623-IND-15 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 PER OTH-
c AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N UB-0161P573-15 CA Only STATUTE ATUTE ER
ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE N N IA EL. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space Is required)
RE: Contract #16022 RFQ, Madison St. Jail Adaptive Reuse (Ph 2) DLR Project #30-16120-00
Certificate Holder & Others are Additional Insureds with respects the operations of the named insured under the Commercial General Liability
and Business Auto coverage as required by written contract (forms CGD4140408, CGD0370405 and CAT3530215).
Waivers of Subrogation in favor of Certificate Holder & Others are applicable to the Commercial General Liability coverage (form CGD4150500),
Business Auto (form CAT3530215) and Workers Compensation (form WC000313-00-01).
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
30-16120-00
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
The County of Maricopa, Arizona THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
401 W. Jefferson,FMD ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
Phoenix AZ 85003
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
1 (LIN) Tom Champoux
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
30615168 1 3299 1 15-16 GL AU UMB WC 1 (LIN) Marci Elam 1 6/28/2016 120348 AM (CDT) 1 Page 1 of 1

Acc•Rb CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
Oka......I 10/1/2016 6/27/2016
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER Lockton Companies CONTACT NAME:
444W. 47th Street, Suite 900 PHONE I FAX
WC, No, Ext): (A/C, No):
Kansas City MO 64112-1906 E-MAIL
(816) 960-9000 ADDRESS:
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
INSURER A: United Specialty Insurance Company 12537
INSURED Phoenix - DLR Group inc. INSURER B:
1414168 6225 No 24 Street, Suite 250
INSURER C :
Phoenix AZ 85016-2020
INSURER D:
INSURER E:
INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 14124279 REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSD SUBR WVD POLICY NUMBER (MMIDD/YYYY) POLICY EFF (MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EXP LIMITS
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE
I CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR NOT APPLICABLE DAMAGE TO RENTED ocxx
PREMISES (Ea occurrence)
MED EXP (Any one person)
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE
POLICY JECT PRO- LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
OTHER $
_ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED (Ea accident) SINGLE LIMIT
ANY AUTO NOT APPLICABLE BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
—
ALL AUTOS OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident'
_
NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE
— HIRED AUTOS AUTOS (Per accident)
$
UMBRELLA LIAB _ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
— EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE NOT APPLICABLE AGGREGATE
DED RETENTION $ $
WORKERS COMPENSATION I PER I 10TH -
AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY Y / N NOT APPLICABLE I STATUTE I I FR
ANY OFFICER/MEMBER PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE EXCLUDED? N / A E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
(Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
A PROFESSIONAL N N USA4103341 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 $2,000,000 PER CLAIM AND
LIABILITY $4,000,000 AGGREGATE
$25,000 DEDUCTIBLE
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)
RE: CONTRACT #16022-RFQ - MADISON ST. JAIL ADAPTIVE REUSE (P112); DLR GROUP #30-16120-00
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
14124279 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA
401 W. JEFFERSON, FMD
PHOENIX AZ 85003
ACORD 25 (2014/01) ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

ONTINUATION DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS (Use only if more space is required)
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY: CLAIMS-MADE POLICY; RETRO DATE 6-1-86; DEFENSE IS INCLUDED
IN THE LIMIT; POLICY LIMITS ARE AGGREGATED; $25,000 DEDUCTIBLE EACH CLAIM.
\CORD 25 (2014/01) Certificate Holder ID: 14124279