AMEND #5 SOLE SOURCE CONTRACT - RKW SIGNATURE.PDF

Serial 12081-SS C-19-12-050-3-06
AMENDMENT NUMBER 5
TO
CONTRACT PURSUANT TO SOLE SOURCE
BY AND BETWEEN
MARICOPA COUNTY
AND
WALKER AND PESKIN°, PLLC
I. Maricopa County by and through the Maricopa County Attorney(collectively, "County")
entered into a Contract Pursuant to Sole Source, Serial No. 12081-SS ("Contract") with
Walker & Peskind (the "Firm" or "Counsel") on or about May 30, 2012 with an original
expiration date of May 31, 2013. The purpose of the Contract was legal representation
of the County in the matter of United States of America vs. Maricopa, County of, et al.
case no. 12-cv-0981-PHX-ROS, in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The
agreement has been amended previously to extend the expiration term, to increase the
budget for the extended representation periods and to redefine the purpose and scope
of work. Amendment 4 approved by the Board in December, 2015 mistakenly defined
the scope of work. Collectively, the County and the Firm may be referred to as "Parties"
or individually, either may be referred to as "Party."
II. The Parties mutually desire to amend the Contract so as to extend the terms and to
further clarify the purpose and scope of representation.
Ill. Pursuant to paragraph 5.11, the Parties agree to rescind Amendment Number 4 and to
amend the Contract as follows:
A. Retroactive to April 16, 2015, to amend the purpose of the Contract, Section 2.0
Intent, as follows:
"Maricopa County retains Contractor to represent the County in: 1) United States
of America vs. Maricopa, County of, et al., case no. CV12-0981-PHX-ROS, in
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona; and 2) Manuel de Jesus Ortega
Melendres et al. vs. Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., case no. CV07-02513-PHX-GMS,
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, retroactive to April 16, 2015.
Work shall be assigned by the County based on the County's needs.
CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL COUNTY POLICIES
UPON EXECUTION OF THIS CONTRACT.
B. Make corresponding changes to the first paragraph of Section 3.1 Scope
of Work, as follows:
"This is to formally engage your firm to represent the County in: 1) United
States of America vs. Maricopa, County of, case no. CV12-0981-PHX-ROS, in
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, and 2) Manuel de Jesus Ortega
Melendres et al. vs. Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., case no. CV07-02513-PHX-GMS,
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, retroactive to April 16, 2015."
IV. This amendment is subject to A.R.S. §38-511.

Serial 12081-SS C-19-12-050-3-06
V. The foregoing paragraphs contain all the changes to the Agreement. All other
terms and conditions of the original Agreement not amended hereby remain the
same and are in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
date and year first set forth above.
CONTRACTOR: WALKER & PESKIND, PLLC, 16100 NORTH 71 ST STREET
SUITE 140, SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254-2236
"4, 9 2 6/6
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE
PRINTED NAME AND TITLE
MAR1COPA COUNTY
CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATE
ATTESTED:
CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Deputy County Attorney DATE