AMENDMENT NUMBER 4 WALKER-PESKIND 100515.DOCX

Serial 12081-SS C-19-12-050-3-05
AMENDMENT NUMBER 4
TO
CONTRACT PURSUANT TO SOLE SOURCE
BY AND BETWEEN
MARICOPA COUNTY
AND
WALKER AND PESKIND, PLLC
I. Maricopa County administered by and through the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office
(collectively, “County”) entered into a Contract Pursuant to Sole Source, Serial No.
12081-SS (“Contract”) with Walker & Peskind (the “Firm” or “Counsel”) on or about May
30, 2012 with an original expiration date of May 31, 2013. The purpose of the Contract
was legal representation of the County and Joseph M. Arpaio in his official capacity as
Sheriff of Maricopa County in the matter of United States of America vs. Maricopa,
County of, et al. case no. CV12-0981-ROS, in U.S. District Court for the District of
Arizona. The agreement has been amended three times to extend the expiration term
and the budget for the extended representation periods. Collectively, the County and the
Firm may be referred to as “Parties” or individually, either may be referred to as “Party.”
II. Pursuant to paragraph 5.11, the Parties mutually desire to amend the Contract as
follows:
A. Retroactive to April 16, 2015 amend purpose of the agreement, Section 2.0
Intent, as follows:
“Maricopa County retains Contractor to represent the County and Joseph M.
Arpaio in his official capacity as Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona: 1) United
States of America vs. Maricopa, County of, et al., case no. CV12-0981-ROS, in
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona; and 2) to represent the County in
various related matters including the matter of Manuel de Jesus Ortega
Melendres et al. vs. Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., case no. PHX-CV-07-02513-GMS,
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, retroactive to April 16, 2015.
Work shall be assigned by the County based on the County’s needs.
CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL COUNTY POLICIES
UPON EXECUTION OF THIS CONTRACT.
B. Make corresponding changes to the first paragraph of 3.1 Scope of Work,
as follows:
“This is to formally engage your firm to represent the County and Joseph M.
Arpaio in his official capacity as Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona: 1) United
States of America vs. Maricopa, County of, case no. CV12-0981-ROS, in U.S.
District Court for the District of Arizona, and 2) to represent the County in various
related matters including the matter of Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres et al.
vs. Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., case no. PHX- CV-07-02513-GMS, in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Arizona, retroactive to April 16, 2015.”

Serial 12081-SS C-19-12-050-3-05
III. This amendment is subject to A.R.S. §38-511.
IV. The foregoing paragraphs contain all the changes to the Agreement. All other
terms and conditions of the original Agreement not amended hereby remain the
same and are in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
date and year first set forth above.
CONTRACTOR: WALKER & PESKIND, PLLC, 16100 NORTH 71ST STREET
SUITE 140, SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254-2236
__________________________________ _______________
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE
__________________________________
PRINTED NAME AND TITLE
MARICOPA COUNTY
__________________________________ _______________
CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATE
ATTESTED:
__________________________________ _______________
CLERK OF THE BOARD DATE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ _______________
Deputy County Attorney DATE