MAG TM16 UNSIGNED FY16 UNITED WORKPLAN AND BUDGET.PDF

MARICOPA
ASSOCIATION of
GOVERNMENTS
302 North 1st Avenue, Suite 300 A Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Phone (602) 254-6300 A FAX (602) 254-6490
E-mail: rnag@ezmeg.gov A Web site: www.ezmag.gov
August 3 I , 2015
Mr, Phillip McNeely
Director
Maricopa County Air Quality Department
1001 North Central Avenue, Suite 125
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Dear
In May 2015, the Maricopa Association of Governments Regional Council, approved the FY2016 Unified
Planning Work Program (UPWP) and Annual Budget that includes $962,347 for the Trip Reduction
Program. We are forwarding an amendment for your consideration to provide this funding to your
agency.
Attachment One contains a new Appendix A-I for the FY 2016 Work Program element and a new
Appendix A-2 for a revised scope of services, schedule, and budget for work to be conducted by
Maricopa County.
To expedite the amendment process, the work element from the UPWP is used to revise the scope of
services, schedule and budget for the program. Please sign and return to the MAG office both copies
of Attachment Two containing Amendment Ito Agreement 656. A fully executed amendment will be
transmitted to your office.
If you have any questions, please contact Dean Giles at (602) 254-6300,
Enclosures
A Voluntary Association of Local Governments in the Maricopa Region
City of Apache Junction A Arizona Department of Transportation A City of Avondale A City ef Buckeye A Town of Carefree A Town of Cave Creek A City of Chandler A Citizens Transportation Oversight Committee
City of El Mirage A Town of Florence A Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation A Town of Fountain Hills A Town of Gila Bend A Gila River Indian Community A Town of Gilbert A City of Glendale A City of Goodyear
Town of Guadalupe A City of Litchfield Park A City of Maricopa A Maricopa County A City of Mesa A Town of Paradise Valley A City of Peoria A City of Phoenix A Pine' County A Town of Queen Creek
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community A City of Scottsdale A City of Surprise A City of Tempe A City of Tolleson A Town of Wickenburg A Town of Youngtown

Appendix A- I
FY 20 I 6 Unified Planning Work Program

MARICOPA
ASSOCIATION of
GOVERNMENTS
302 North 1st Avenue Suite 300 Phoenix Arizona 85003

IVIARICORA
500: Program Implementation ASSOCIATION OrOVERNIVIENTS of
Demand Management
Program Description
Demand Management refers to distinct programs that
collectively provide coordination with employers, local
jurisdictions, and the general public to encourage the use
of alternative transportation options to the single occupant
vehicle (SOV) and advise on ways to improve air quality.
Maricopa County administers the Trip Reduction Pro- TRIP REDUCTIM
gram (TRP) to all major employers, and schools with 50 or
more employees or students, based on the Trip Reduction
Ordinance. The Travel Reduction Programs Office for the PROGRAM
State of Arizona encourages state employees in Maricopa
County to use alternative modes of transportation through Annual Report
instruction, promotion, and incentives. The Regional 2014
Public Transportation Authority (Valley Metro RPTA)
offers a free ride matching service to commuters interested
in carpooling, vanpooling, and bicycling to work; manages Maricopa Couoty Alt Quality Depottortout
and subsidizes a vanpool program; and conducts alterna-
tive mode outreach and education under the Regional CLEAN AIR
Rideshare and Telework Program.
Maricopa County contracts with Valley Metro RPTA to Marino], County
assist employers affected by the TRP to provide technical
and promotional service support.
As part of the Regional Rideshare and Telework Program, 2014-2015 Accomplishments
Valley Metro RPTA also conducts telework outreach and
education to encourage employers and employees to start According to the Maricopa County Trip Reduction
telework programs. This outreach promotes telework as Program, in FY 2014 the number of major employers
a viable trip reduction option and important alternative in the program decreased to 1,180 from 1,193 in FY
mode to the SOV commute. Telework is a way to work 2013. In FY 2014, the annual survey was adminis-
remotely while reducing vehide miles traveled. tered to 601,336 employee participants and 215,278
driving-aged students as compared to 603,442
employees and 112,827 students in FY 2013.
Mission Statement
In FY 2014, total alternative mode usage, including
The mission of Demand Management is to provide out- telecommuting and compressed schedules, stood at
standing services, programs, and materials that inspire 46 percent, comparable to the 43 percent recorded in
citizen involvement and action to reduce air pollution and 2013, although now significantly higher than the 37
traffic congestion. percent recorded in 2012.
Valley Metro had more than 72 million transit board-
ings in FY 2014.
Vanpool riders saved more than 58.3 million miles AN. The number of new users of ShareTheRide.corn
of travel and 2.3 million gallons of fuel, an increase increased 16.6 percent from FY 2013, and the
of 8.25 percent from the prior year. The number of number of active users increased by 36.4 percent
travel miles saved is equal to circumnavigating the from FY 2013. The FY 2014 ended with nearly 29,000
earth more than 2,300 times, or traveling to the active users.
moon and back more than 115 times.
500-163

MARICOPA
ASSOCIATION & GOVERNMENTS of FY 2016 Unified Planning Work Program & Annual Budget
In 2014, nearly 11,100 people requested ride matches
through ShareTheRicle.com and approximately 8,200
found a shared ride.
In 2014, users of ShareTheRide.com logged nearly 7.415ki9-7FM4A •
650,000 alternative mode commutes, shared nearly -ShateTheRldu 15 a frel. 0.1cItn9 stsc.pl 11,?=1.
12 million commute miles, and saved approximately (Cumulus vorbooL bausti, fo qutl3y blhe or ard urat's sornrubr Outrun Pilt4autotan Lutd .• afoo outpaal,
$1.3 million in gas money. More than 7.2 million rOrnoleS, pan boTuro oreou coota .s.ts mu]
pounds of greenhouse gas emissions were also saved GE1 VlurlEol by .c1,3,1r9 ISRC4RSI botton_
by ShareTheRide. corn users. Learn too. about Vol!uy 131.o bloqth by tho k.:ut
Attitudes toward advertising that encourages people
to use alternative modes of transportation continues
to be positive; 74 percent viewed this type of adver- Fe] IOnSinformati.a, ptgase rad Var../ Ratio .001.111112 •
tising as very or somewhat favorable. Sdulk•us at CO2.252.FUE (7434 - ••• •
V\TA !
A significantly higher proportion of employed
residents indicated "yes", they would consider using
Valley Metro's online matching system (68 percent;
up from 58 percent in 2013). tibil•uebgzir A112,11,1etupb,-,t ilretxri I (notototooxu.ityliu ecif,r11451ge.
M..i.topaCtuutty.
According to the Transportation Coordinator survey, Mate of Arbana Telma rkProgr=
communication effectiveness of Valley Metro Com- Arizona Office 1000. of novel 17 IhArront. ItecluchooPrograass 5131Te 431
mute Solutions representatives is at 99 percent. In Pkneosa.Atizona (60-2.)542-7403 85007
FY 2014, representatives made more than 10,000
employer assistance contacts and more than 6,600 .Welcoltd
people were reached through employer trainings and iState of Ari4prig Tel,rdvork P,Ograni
events.
The State of Arizona Telework Program completed
a total redesign of the www.teleworkarizona.com
website and online training module. The website was
modernized with new and updated information and
graphics. The new computer based training (CBT)
was created and is now available to all state employ-
ees for training and will assist with an automated
renewal process.
The Preferential Parking Program and Commuter
Club are both experiencing increases of membership
at this time.
The State of Arizona well exceeded the employee
outreach goal for this fiscal year. More than 3,900
employees were educated about alternate mode
options available to them.
During Rideshare Month (October 2014), alternative
mode users logged 52,167 trips on ShareTheRide.corn,
for a total distance of 884,011 miles. This distance is
similar to circumnavigating the earth 35 times.
5 00-1 64

MARICOPA
500: Program Implementation ASSOCIATION of
GOVERNMENTS
Trip Reduction Program 500-0110
Assist employers in achieving their trip reduction goals
by providing quality training, services, and programs.
Follow-up on FY 2015 Outcome Measures
• Measure: An increase of two percent in the number of
alternative Vehicle Miles Traveled by Trip Reduction
Program participants from the level achieved in FY
2014.
Result: Based on Survey Analyses results through the first
two months of FY 2015, alternative Vehicle Miles Trav-
eled by TRP commuters increased by 0.3 percent for (All"
site types when compared to the same period of FY 2014.
• Measure: An increase of two percent in the "tons of Result: The number of employer plans approved by the
pollution saved" for those commuters using an alter- TRP Task Force during the first two months of FY 2015
native mode of travel to get to their workplace from that included subsidized vanpools (new or ongoing)
the level achieved in FY 2014. increased from 50 to 52.
Result: Based on Survey Analyses results through the • Measure: An increase of five in the annual number of
first two months of FY 2015, "tons of pollution saved" employers that start telecommuting programs from
for "All" site types by TRP commuters using an alterna- the number achieved in FY 2014.
tive mode of travel decreased by 36 percent for "All" site
types when compared to the same period of FY 2014. Result: The number of employer plans approved by the
TRP Task Force during the first two months of FY 2015
• Measure: An increase to 36 percent in the annual that included a telecommuting program (new or ongo-
commuter use of alternative modes one or more days ing) increased from 372 to 376.
per week from the level achieved in FY 2014 based on
the TRP survey. • Measure: An increase of five in the annual number of
employers that start compressed work week programs
Result: Based on Survey Analyses results through the from the number achieved in FY 2014.
first two months of FY 2015, commuter use of alterna-
tive modes for one or more days per week increased Result: The number of employer plans approved by the
from 34.82 percent to 34.93 percent when compared to TRP Task Force during the first two months of FY 2015
the same period of FY 2014. that included a compressed work week program (new or
ongoing) decreased from 453 to 420.
• Measure: An increase of five in the annual number
of employers who subsidized the bus/light rail for • Measure: An increase of five percent in the annual
employee commuter programs from the number number of TRP employees and driving-age students,
achieved in FY 2014. and an increase of 10 in the number of TRP employers
utilizing the electronic, e-survey version of the annual
Result: The number of employer plans approved by the TRP survey from the level achieved in FY 2014.
TRP Task Force during the first two months of FY 2015
that included a bus subsidy (new or ongoing) remained Result: Through the first two months of FY 2015, the
at 426. number of TRP employees and driving-age students
using the e-survey version increased by 52 percent and
• Measure: An increase of two in the annual number of the number of TRP employers utilizing the electronic,
subsidized vanpools for employee commuter pro- e-survey version of the annual TRP survey increased from
grams from the number achieved in FY 2014. 93 to 97 when compared to the same period of FY 2014.
500-1 65

MARICOPA
ASSOCIATION GOVERIMIVIENTS of FY 2016 Unified Planning Work Program & Annual Budget
FY 2016 Objectives FY 2016 Outcome Measures
Encourage TRP employer promotion of alternative . An increase of two percent in the number of alterna-
modes of transportation, including carpooling, van- tive Vehicle Miles Traveled by Trip Reduction Pro-
pooling, taking the bus, using the light rail, bicycling, gram participants from the level achieved in FY 2015.
walking, and alternative fueled vehicles, as well as
alternative work schedules including telecommuting • An increase of two percent in the "tons of pollu-
and compressed work schedules. tion saved" for those commuters using an alternative
mode of travel to get to their workplace from the level
Provide training and assistance to TRP employers in achieved in FY 2015.
all aspects of the Trip Reduction Program require-
ments such as conducting surveys, writing, and imple- • An increase to 36 percent in the annual commuter
menting a TRP plan. use of alternative modes one or more days per week
from the level achieved in FY 2015 based on the TRP
..1,.N. Conduct presentations and training to promote alter- survey.
native modes of transportation and work schedules to
employer management, TRP organization committees, • An increase of five in the annual number of employ-
and Transportation Coordinator Associations, and ers who subsidized the bus/light rail for employee
facilitate and assist with the marketing and promotion commuter programs from the number achieved in FY
of a year round RPTA campaign for Valley employees 2015.
that encourages weekly use of trip reduction solutions
and transportation fair events through distribution of • An increase of two in the annual number of subsidized
brochures. vanpools for employee commuter programs from the
number achieved in FY 2015.
... Increase the number of TRP employers that imple-
ment strategies to promote the use of alternative • An increase of five in the annual number of employers
modes of transportation and work schedules, such as that start telecommuting programs from the number
subsidized public transit and vanpool fares, prefer- achieved in FY 2015.
ential parking, and guaranteed ride home, and who
offer or expand telecommuting and compressed work • An increase of five in the annual number of employers
schedules. that start compressed work week programs from the
number achieved in FY 2015.
Ie., Encourage and assist employers in establishing a
"commuter choice tax benefit" program through edu- • An increase of five percent in the annual number
cation, workshops, and outreach. of TRP employees and driving-age students and an
increase of 10 in the number of TRP employers utiliz-
Increase the annual number of TRP employers and ing the electronic, e-survey version of the annual TRP
driving-aged students utilizing the electronic, e-survey survey from the level achieved in FY 2015.
version of the annual TRP survey. The e-survey is
available in either the Intranet or the Internet version.
5001 66

:TOW NeVi,! :Total :Total Rt. Rt. 0600-0631 0600-0631 0600-0157 0600-0150 0600-0150 0600-0150 0600-0150 0500-0510 0500-0510 0500-0160 0500-0160 0500-0150 0500-0150 0500-0120 0500-0120 0500-0110 0500-0110 2016 * This Total Total FY FY 1000-0025 1000-0025 0600-9900 0600-9900 0600-0631 0600-0631 0600-0631 0600-0411 0600-0411 0600-0180 0600-0170 0600-0170 0600-0170 0600-0145 0600-0120 0600-0120 0600-0110 0500-0595 0100-0410 0100-0310 Number FY 2016 Funding
201.6'.Neiry 201.6'.Neiry 2016 2016 2015 0600-0157 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 New Associate will 2016 2016 New New 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 0600-0631 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 Program 2016 Highway 2016 2016 2016 Program 2016 2016 2016 Project New for
.COrisnitaritS.:and. On-Board On-Board Grand VMR VMR Valley Valley Emergency Emergency Purchase Purchase Regional Regional Travel Travel Trip Trip Pass-Through produce Video Video Disability Disability Transportation Transportation Travel Operations Operations Interstate Interstate Avondale ITS Systems Traffic Pedestrian Cost Risk Transportation MAC Don't MAC Air Air Quality Name FY
Pass-Through Pass-Through Survey Survey Avenue Planning Planning Metro/RPTA Metro/RPTA 911 911 PM-10 PM-10 Rideshare Rideshare Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction all Consultants Consultants Outreach Outreach Outreach Outreach Survey's Study Study 10 10 / / Strategic Strategic Management Signal and Program Analysis Regional Trash Quality : Consultants 2016
PasS4..hrOngh . . Agreernents Agreernents of of Transit 2015 Support Support Planning Planning Certified Certified and and Program Program Program Program videos. Associate" Associate" Behavioral Behavioral Data 2016 Papago Papago for Plan Optimization Bicycle On-Call for the Division Transportation Arizona Litter Associate Assistance New
.::: .::: Transit Transit Feasibility Planning Planning Street Street Telework Telework Agreements Associate Associate Model Model Application Freeway Freeway Transportation City of and Facilities MAC Associate On-Call
.!. Agreernents Users Users Study Grand Support Support and and Associate Travel Tunnel Tunnel Safety Buckeye Operations Program Design Regional On-Call Prevention Consultant
Sweepers Sweepers Program Program Data Data Traffic Traffic Plan On-Call Plan Associate &
On-Call On-Call Assistance Freeway Education
Avenue Survey's and and
New New:
$4,476,190 $4,476,190 $200,000 $200,000 $100,000 $750,000 $750,000 $224,720 $224,720 $105,885 $105,885 $1,404,238 $1,404,238 $594,000 $594,000 $135,000 $135,000 $962,347 $962,347 Total: Project $2,615,851 $2,615,851 $70,000 $70,000 518,000 518,000 $250,000 $250,000 $32,000 Data $75,000 $75,000 $125,851 $100,000 $300,000 $25,000 $400,000 $300,000 $90,000 $300,000 $300,000 $130,000 $100,000 Total PrOjeCt Pass-Through
1 1 Transit :
$.927)55.6::. $552,836 $552,836 $130,000 $130,000 $148,500 $148,500 $33,750 $33,750 $240,586 $240,586 Years Future Funding $375,000 $375,000 $100,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 Years Funding
, Projects
$1,268,511 $1,268,511 Feasibility $445,500 $445,500 $101,250 $101,250 $721,761 $721,761 2016 CMAQ MATCH NO Application .2016 MATCH.: NO
1 1 . .
$1,404,238 $1,404,238 $1,404,238 $1,404,238 2016: CMAQ MATCH 2010: cklAQ MATCH
1 1 Study Associate
$725,000 $725,000 $100,000 $200,000 $325,000 $100,000 .::.:.P1120.1.6.1
•
$21090, $218,000 $218,000 $70,000 $70,000 $18,000 $18,000 $130,000 11;.-11;1.1.:.5.:-
$100,000
$425g15. $125,851 $125,851 $32,000 $125,851 2016 : HSIP:
1: .
...$021:p00:•• $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 2016: FTA 5307 101.6
$100,000 $32,000
$1,024,720 $1,024,720 $200,000 $200,000 $100,000 5500,000 5500,000 $224,720 $224,720 Sales Tax lotal $1,172,000 $1,172,000 $250,000 $250,000 $32,000 $75,000 $75,000 $25,000 $200,000 $90,000 $300,000 $200,000 Sales Tax Total
.$4:0885 $105,885 $105,885 $105,885 $105,885 !..Assessment 911 A..5Sesrdent Emergency .;101.6%..
.: . .

Appendix A-2
FY 201 6 Scope of Services

Maricopa County
Air Quality Department
ravel Reduction Program SCOPE OF SERVICES
)01 North Central Avenue
Jite 550 TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAM
loenix, Arizona 85004
lone: (602) 506-6750 October 1, 2015 — September 30, 2016
lx: (602) 506-6669
Task 1: Trip Reduction Program
Maricopa County staff will:
Administer the Trip Reduction Program (TRP) to major employers within Maricopa
County who have 50 or more employees.
Issue approximately 735,000 surveys to employers taking part in the Trip Reduction
Program during the fiscal year.
Process and analyze the Trip Reduction Program surveys for participating employers.
Research and identify new major employers that are legally required to take part in the
Trip Reduction Program.
Provide summary analyses to employers participating in the TRP regarding their
employee commuting habits based on the employee survey results. With this
information, employers are able to formulate a plan that will reduce single occupancy
vehicle (SOV) trips.
Submit completed plans to the Maricopa County Travel Reduction Program Regional
Task Force for approval.
Review and monitor employer trip reduction plans.
Task 2: Trip Reduction Program Training and Assistance
Maricopa County staff will negotiate an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Regional
Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) regarding training, technical assistance,
collateral materials for Trip Reduction Program and promotion of all alternative
transportation modes and strategies.
Regional Public Transportation Authority staff will:
Provide training and technical assistance, develop collateral materials, on-line support, e-
newsletters, webinars and in-person training. Develop promotional kits for employers
and associated collateral pieces four times per year that promote the use of alternative
modes.

Niiiricopa County Travel Reduction Piogram
i'Y2016 Scope of Services iintl Schedule
Pap: 2 of 3
08/26/15
Produce brochures, informational materials, collateral materials and promotional items
pursuant to iVIAG Consideraions Guidelines for Promotional Items (Attachment B) as
necessary, to promote trip reduction strategies.
Provide technical assistance to Trip Reduction Program employers in achieving the
prescribed reductions in single occupancy vehicle (SOV) trips or SOV miles traveled
through one-on-one assistance, promotion and informational and educational materials
as available.
Provide training to Trip Reduction Program employer transportation coordinators on
the requirements of the law including the survey process, plan writing and
documentation; types of alternative modes; and trip reduction strategies.
Form and facilitate transportation coordinator workshops and webinars.
Monitor and track activities to evaluate the effectiveness of the training, promotions and
collateral materials as part of the Annual On-line Transportation Coordinator Survey.
Conduct a year round campaign for Valley employees that encourages weekly use of trip
reduction solutions undertaken by the Regional Public Transportation Authority and
designed to meet the outcomes of the scope of work, which may include print materials,
paid media, public and media relations, public affairs, and events.
Maintain and enhance the online rideshare matching system, ShareTheRide.com .
Enhance ShateTheRide.corn to provide information on drive-alone alternatives. Develop
and implement online contests that encourage commuters to register in the online
matching system. Implement up to three employer challenge contests.
Reporting
Maricopa County staff will:
Section II of the Agreement, Project Costs and Billing Procedures, indicates that "all
costs incurred in preparing invoices and progress reports shall be included in the general
and administrative expenses or the overhead."
Send monthly progress reports and invoices to MAG- in the prescribed format and
document work performed in each task.
Deliver quarterly reports regarding achievement of Outcome Measures to MAG 45 days
following the end of the quarter (e.g. first quarterly report for the period October 1 —
December 31, 2015 is due February 16, 2016). At a minimum, the quarterly report will
include documentation regarding the following:

faricopa County Travel Reduction Program
17Y2016 Scope of Scrviccs and Schedule
Page 3 of 3
00/26/15
• Accomplishments
• Methods used to achieve outcome measures
• Status of achieving outcome measures
• Methodology used to quantify measures
• Comparison of status in achieving the outcome measures for FY2016 versus FY2015
Deliver a draft Trip Reduction Program annual report by November 2, 2016 for the
period October 1, 2015 — September 30, 2016. In general, the annual report will be a
compilation of the quarterly reports. In addition, the following items -will be addressed.
• Methodology used to quantify outcome measures and status of achieving outcome
measures. A comparison will be provided regarding the status achieving the outcome
measures for FY2016 versus FY2015.
• Estimated program effectiveness including dollars per trip reduced.
• Comparison with similar programs being implemented in other urban areas.
• Impacts of program on characteristics of peak commute travel in Maricopa County.
Deliver the final Trip Reduction Program annual report by November 27, 2016.
Schedule
• Trip Reduction Program implementation — ongoing
• Negotiate Intergovernmental Agreement with the Regional Public Transportation
Authority - October — December 2015
• Submit quarterly progress reports — 45 days following close of quarter (1' quarter
October through December 2015)
• Program annual report — draft — November 2, 2016
• Program annual report — November 27, 2016

Maricopa County Air Quality Department
Trip Reduction Program
MAG Contract Number 656, Amendment 'I
Maricopa County
FY2016 TRP Budget (TM16)
Costs and Hours By Task
TASK 1 CONTRACTOR - MCAQD/TRP Hours by Personnel & Task
Period: October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016
Raw Direct Task 1
Labor Trip Reduction Total Total
Personnel Hourly Rate Program Hours Cost
Cody Maria $37.13 586.91 586.91 $21,791.97
Cummings Phil $30.18 880.37 880.37 $26,569.57
vacant $18.45 880.37 880.37 $16,242.83
Barrera Cyrstal $16.76 880.37 880.37 $14,755.00
Hartsock Brad $30.18 880.37 880.37 $26,569.57
Herb Patrice $15.67 880.37 880.37 $13,795.40
Jannett Ernie $23.01 880.37 880.37 $20,257.31
Martinez Sylvia $20.45 880.37 880.37 $18,003.57
Moeller Greg $21.29 880.37 880.37 $18,743.08
O'Rourke Linda $19.36 880.37 880.37 $17,043.96
Starr Sheila $20.14 880.37 880.37 $17,730.65
Wheatley Michele $15.81 880.37 880.37 $13,918.65
Monroe (Grants Coordinator) Patience $23,72 353.50 353.50 $8,385.02
Subtotal $233,806,58
Total Productive Hours 10,624.48 10,624.48
Total Hourly Cost $233,806.58 $233,806.58
Fringe Benefit (72.31%) 72.31% $169,065.54 $169,065.54
Total Labor with Fringe $402,872.12 $402,872.12
TASK 1 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (IV1CAQD/TRP)
Period: October 1, 2015.. September 30, 2016 Expenses by Task Total
Description Task 1 Cost
Supplies $4,000.00 $4,000.00
Non-Capital Equipment (Computer/Printer Equipment) $0.00 $0.00
Services (Rent, Equip Leases, Printing, Shipping, Purchases, Mileage, R&M, Other) $70,727.07 $70,727.07
Total Reimbursable Expenses $74,727.07 $74,727.07
TASK 2 SUBCONTRACTOR (RPTANalley Metro - Commute Solutions) HOW'S by Personnel & Task
Period: October 1, 2015- September 30, 2016
Raw Direct Task 2
Labor Training & Total Total
Personnel Hourly Rate Assistance Hours Cost
Coomer Dawn $44.74 611.64 611,64 $27,364.77
Day Suzanne $30.05 542.88 542.88 $16,313.54
Duarte Lillian $30.05 542.88 542,88 $16,313.54
Perez Margaret $29.76 904.80 904,80 $26,926.85
Reid Jeff $22.80 542.88 542.88 $12,377.66
Schneider CJ $29.30 904.80 904.80 $26,510.64
Subtotal $125,807.00
Total Productive Hours 4,049.88 4,049.88
Total Hourly Subcontractors Cost $125,807.00 $125,807.00
Fringe (60.40%) 60.40% $75,987.43 $75,987.43
Overhead (63.49%) 63.49% $79,874.86 $79,874.86
Reimbursable Expense (Postage) $7,500.00 $7,500.00
Reimbursable Expense (Printing) $6,399.71 $6,399.71
Reimbursable Expense (Promotional) $6,000.00 $6,000.00
Reimbursable Expense (Meetings/Mileage/Translations/Mail) $5,500.00 $5,500.00
Reimbursable Expense (Subcontractor - Advertising/Marketing) $49,831.00 $49,831.00
Reimbursable Expense (Subcontractor - Other) $18,000.00 $18,000.00
Total Subcontractor Cost $374,900.00 $374,900.00
GRAND TOTAL
Period: October 1, 2015- September 30, 2016 Total Costs by Task Total
Description Task 1 Task 2 Cost
Total Labor with Fringe $402,872.12 $402,872.12
Reimbursable Expenses $74,727.07 $74,727.07
Overhead (23.00%) 23.00% $109,847.81 $109,847.81
Subcontractors $374,900.00 $374,900.00
GRAND TOTAL $587,447.00 $374,900.00 $962,347.00
Y2016 TRP MAG Budget {TM16) -PM DRAFT 6.21.2015 .xlex 8/25/201

MARICOPA
ASSOCIATION of
tt. GOVERNMENTS
Attachment Two
MAG Agreement No, 656, Amendment No. 1
FY 2016 Unified Planning Work Program
The Agreement entered into by and between the Maricopa Association of Governments and
Maricopa County, effective October I , 2014, states that the scope of services to be accomplished by
the parties pursuant to the agreement will be set forth annually by MAG in the Unified Planning Work
Program and that the element from the Work Program will be conducted by Maricopa County and
the basis for payment shall be provided to Maricopa County by MAG.
As required by the Agreement, attached is the funding for the elements to be conducted by Maricopa
County from the EY 2016 Unified Planning Work Program duly I , 2015 June 30, 2016). The new
Appendix A- I and Appendix A-2 supersedes the previous Appendix A-1 and Appendix A-2 to MAG
Agreement No. 656.
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.
MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF
MAR1COPA COUNTY GOVERNMENTS
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Steve Chucri Dennis Smith
NAME PRINTED NAME PRINTED
Chairman, Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors Executive Director
TITLE TITLE
DATE DATE

Attachment B
NAG Considerations/Guidelines for Promotional Items
• Should be appropriate to target audience.
• Should have call to action - Web site/phone number at minimum.
• Should advance the mission.
• According to the Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments
(2 CFR Part 225, formerly known as OMB Circular A-87), unallowable advertising and
public relations costs include costs of advertising and public relations designed solely to
promote the governmental unit.
• Cost considerations — Is the cost appropriate and effective for the number of
impressions/influence achieved? Would an alternate advertising strategy reach more
people for the same or a lesser amount of funding?
• Should be items that are business related and could be used in the office, where
feasible.
• Should be recyclable or made from recycled or renewable materials, where feasible.
• Agencies should exercise good judgment and be sensitive to the appearance and
perception of the item.