Extracted text (via pymupdf_layout)
399602 characters
Report to the Board of Supervisors
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Board Hearing Date: July 22, 2015
Case #/Title: Z2014012 – Superstition Manor
Supervisor District: 2
Applicant/Owner: John Burns
Request: Major Amendment to Special Use Permit (Z2012086) for
Superstition Manor
Site Location: Located at the northwest corner of Brown Rd. and Signal
Butte Rd in the east Mesa area
Site Size: Approx. 6.2 acres
County Island Status: N/A
Additional
Comments: Attached is handout material provided to the Commission
including changes to the recommended conditions and
opposition/support documents since the writing of the
report. The applicant also gave a handout to the
Commission, attached.
Since the Commission hearing staff has received an appeal
of the P&Z recommendation to the Board. This appeal,
attached, requires this case to be on the regular agenda.
Staff has received a memo from the New River/Desert Hills
Community Association (NRDHCA) on 6/16/15. The memo is
included as supplemental to this report.
On 6/12/15 staff received an email from Mr. Donald Dahler
(included with this report), the supplier of petitions and
emails regarding opposition for this case. He removed
several of the names from the opposition list within 300’ of
the subject site indicating they have “changed their minds”.
The memo states that there are four (4) parcels within 300’
that are still opposed. Staff confirms three (3) of these
parcels in opposition. Parcel #220-04-014P is now under new
ownership (updated by the Maricopa County Assessor’s
Office) where the new owners support the Amendment.
Within the 300’ radius, staff counted ten (10) residents in
July 22, 2015
Z2014012
Page 1 of 6
support of the Amendment. The opposition parcels do not
trigger a Super Majority vote by the Board. The trigger for a
supermajority vote is when 20% or more of property owners
within 300’ radius of the subject site, by number and area
register opposition to the case. The map for
opposition/support calculation is included as an attachment
to this report with the following opposition percentages:
31.49% opposed parcel acreage within 300’ buffer
17.65% opposed parcel numbers within 300’ buffer
Since this case was originally opened in 2014, staff has
received a total of 246 opposition and 592 support
documents in the form of emails and petitions. This is not
excluding duplicates. Staff did not include the
opposition/support items from before this case was first
withdrawn on June 9, 2014. However, staff includes these
documents with this report to have all documents available
for analysis by the Board. Lastly, staff received one email of
support and one email of opposition since the Commission
hearing, these are included with this report.
Commission
Recommendation: On 6/11/15, the Commission voted 5-0-1 (Commissioner
Muller abstained), recommended denial as filed, and
approval of only the following requests for Z2014012:
1. Increase and reconfiguration of the parking to have a total of 151 parking
spaces (137 regular parking spaces, 5 trailer parking spaces, 6 handicap spaces,
and 3 limousine spaces).
2. Off-site rental business of wedding material as part of the SUP use of the site.
3. 1,850 sq. ft. patio shade cover on the south side of the existing wedding center
building.
4. Allowing altered R1-35 development standards for the following: A 20 ft. setback
from the property lines along Brown Rd. and Signal Butte Rd. and a rear setback
of 20 ft. to allow for the existing wedding center setback. Also, 8 ft. (h) solid walls
along lot lines.
Subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘x’ (in recommended final format):
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan
entitled “Superstition Manor”, consisting of one (1) full-size sheet, dated April 24,
2015, and stamped received April 27, 2015, except as modified by the following
conditions. Within 30 days of Board of Supervisors’ approval, the site plan shall be
revised to delete the 5,000 sf new storage building and 8,116 sf new building
(addition) with grooms room, and 1,157 sf new patio cover – and replace with a
maximum building square footage of 3,400 sf aggregate additional building
space for storage and kitchen only (as approved previously).
July 22, 2015
Z2014012
Page 2 of 6
b. Development of the site shall be in conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “SUP for Superstition Manor”, consisting of eight (8) pages, dated revised
May 22, 2015, and stamped received May 22, 2015, except as modified by the
following conditions. A revised narrative report shall be provided within 30 days
of Board approval that is consistent with the following conditions.
c. These listed conditions supersede all conditions of approval for Z2012086 as
amended Z20130113 & Z2014021.
d. The Special Use Permit is for a wedding/event reception center, catering, and
offsite event consulting and equipment rental storage. Said equipment rental
shall be limited to materials used at the Superstition Manor event center. No
customer pick-up of equipment for off-site use is allowed.
e. The Special Use Permit shall vary the R1-35 development standards to permit an
8’ high solid wall along all lot lines, and a 20’ minimum setback along the Brown
Rd and Signal Butte Rd street lines as well as a 20’ rear setback for the existing
wedding center buildings.
f. All landscaping shall be maintained and replaced as necessary to maintain the
integrity of the proposal for the life of the Special Use Permit.
g. All outdoor lighting shall conform to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
h. The hours of operation (open to the public) for this facility shall be restricted to
between 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to
11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday.
i. The maximum number of people on the property at any one time is limited to
250. There shall be no more than 250 persons on site at any given time. This
includes guests, customers, staff, residents, visitors and any other persons.
j. Security and parking attendants shall be provided for every event (or
combination of concurrent/overlapping events) over 150 guests.
k. No amplified music or speakers are permitted outside other than during a
ceremony officiated by an individual authorized to perform weddings. Amplified
music inside shall not extend past 9:00 p.m. Sunday – Thursday and 10:00 p.m. on
Friday and Saturday. Noise generated on site shall not exceed 55 dB average
over a 10 minute period as measured outside the boundary of the special use
permit.
l. Outdoor parking lot lighting and wall lighting in excess of 60 watt incandescent
or equivalent lumens shall be fully shielded and directed downward. Parking lot
lighting and wall lighting shall be turned off within 30 minutes after the event. This
condition does not apply to outdoor light fixtures at the residential entrance to
the building. There shall be no lighting on perimeter walls except at driveways.
m. The designated onsite parking area must be paved with or use of recycled
asphalt material that meets Air Quality standards with marked spaces. All guests,
July 22, 2015
Z2014012
Page 3 of 6
customers, customers, staff, residents, visitors and any other persons shall park in
the designated parking area and not on the adjacent streets, proximate
neighborhood streets, or offsite residential parcels; except that offsite event
parking at nonresidential properties is permitted with a valet or shuttle service.
n. Maricopa County Department of Transportation extends their recommendation
with the following conditions:
1. The plans show expansion of the SUP area for a distance of ±85 feet along
Brown Road (a minor arterial roadway). Dedication of 25’ (to provide a
65’ total half-width) along Brown Road is required and is shown on the
plan. Dedication of the required right-of-way shall occur prior to the
issuance of zoning clearance for any work on the site.
o. Development of the site shall be in compliance with all applicable Maricopa
County Air Quality rules and regulations.
p. The following Drainage Review conditions shall apply:
1. At the time of the application for building permits, the applicant shall
provide a design for the openings in the north wall such that historic flow
conditions are maintained.
2. At the time of the application for building permits, the applicant shall
provide calculations substantiating the design of the new drainage
improvements, including culverts, on the site.
3. At the time of the application for building permits, the applicant shall
provide required testing to demonstrate that the retention basins will drain
within 36 hours.
4. The new parking areas and storage building areas shall be graded such
that their runoff flows are directed to the new retention basin(s).
5. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and the Maricopa
County Drainage Policies and Standards.
6. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
7. Detailed Grading and Drainage Plans showing the new site improvements
must be submitted for the acquisition of building permits.
q. This Special Use Permit shall expire on March 27, 2023.
July 22, 2015
Z2014012
Page 4 of 6
r. The applicant/owner shall submit a written report outlining the status of the
development annually from the date of approval by the Board of Supervisors.
The status report shall be reviewed by staff to determine whether the Special Use
Permit remains in compliance with the approved conditions. If the conditions of
Special Use Permit approval have not been maintained the matter may be
considered by the Board of Supervisors for revocation upon recommendation by
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
s. Amendments to the site plan and narrative report shall be processed as a
revised application in accordance with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
Article 304.9.
t. Noncompliance with the conditions of approval will be treated as a violation in
accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. Further,
noncompliance of the conditions of approval may be grounds for the Planning
and Zoning Commission to take action in accordance with Chapter 3
(Conditional Zoning).
u. Non-compliance with the regulations administered by the Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department, Maricopa County Department of
Transportation, Drainage Review Division, Planning and Development
Department, or the Flood Control District of Maricopa County may be grounds
for initiating a revocation of this Special Use Permit as set forth in the Maricopa
County Zoning Ordinance.
v. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval is
temporary and allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by
the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions and
stipulations. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition or stipulation,
and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert
to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated
and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any
conditions or stipulations, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not
reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or
possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such
revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit
enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special
Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of
the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted.
w. Event traffic exiting onto Signal Butte Road shall only be permitted turning right /
southbound. Applicant shall address by signage, striping or physical barrier. There
shall be no event traffic ingress/egress from Brown Rd. There shall be no event
traffic ingress/egress onto 107th St other than for the purpose of secondary
emergency access.
x. The following MCESD conditions will apply:
July 22, 2015
Z2014012
Page 5 of 6
1. Contact the Onsite Program (602-506-0372) for possible septic permitting
requirements associated with the expansion (new building up to 6,000 sq.
ft. and 5,000 sq. ft. storage building).
2. Development and engineering design shall be in conformance with the
Maricopa County Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge
Control Regulation. If required, the owner/developer shall prepare a
SWPPP and obtain approval by MCESD prior to construction. (A separate
submittal to MCESD would be required.) If required, upon completion of
construction, the owner shall fulfill MCESD requirements and obtain a post-
construction stormwater permit.
3. If applicable, the site plan shall contain a note designating the entity
responsible for operation and maintenance of the on-lot stormwater
management facilities consistent with an approved operation and
maintenance plan.
Presented by: Ray Banker, Planner
Reviewed by: Darren Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director
Attachments: Supermajority Map (1 page)
5/21/15 P&Z Packet (90 pages)
5/21/15 P&Z Handout (62 pages)
5/21/15 P&Z Applicant Handout (19 pages)
Case Appeal of P&Z Recommendation (1 page)
New River Desert Hills Community Association (NRDHCA) memo (5 pages)
Email and attachments regarding update on opposition within 300’ (6 pages)
Opposition/Support documents prior to withdrawal of case on June, 9, 2014 (68 pages)
One (1) Email of Opposition, One (1) Email of Support since P&Z hearing (2 pages)
Note: 6/11/15 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can be provided upon
request later when available.
July 22, 2015
Z2014012
Page 6 of 6
Maricopa County Regional Development Services GIS
klaricopa County
Regional Development Services
SIC Si/elan
I=1 County Boundary
Interstates
1 Slate Highway
U5 Highway
Major R Dada
Rea idential Sheets
I—I 300' Buffer
Opposition Parcels
Supporting Parcels
Subject Percel
1--1 300' Buffer Interior
I I 300• Buffer Selection
Excluded Percale
axix4r,hd
—125. 5 5 23:38 PIA
Opposition Case Summary
* Note: All Area calculations represent the area of the parcel inside the 300 Buffer
Eligible parcels - excluding subject parcel: 17
Supporting parcels: 10
Opposition parcels: 3
Supporting parcels sq ft: 295,258.67
Opposition parcels so ft: 190,873.46
Subject parcel so ft: 281,968.85
All area inside the 300' buffer: 1,211,396.75
All area inside the 300' buffer - excluding subject parcel, ROW and excluded parcels: 606,153.56
No-response parcels sq ft: 120,021.43
Super Majority opposed parcel acres: 31.49%
Super Majority opposed parcel number: 17.65%
No Response Parcels Supporting Parcels Opposition Parcels
1 APN r Area SqFt I Arca Acres I I AM r Area Sat Area Acres I API,/ [ Area SqFt I Area Acres
220-04-012C 6,337.9546 0.1466 220-04-012A 127,304.903 0.6268 220-04-013E 16,057.5378 10.1391
220-13-0068 37,9631100 0.8715 220-04-013A 6,070.0157 0.1393 220-04-015 97,815.8091 2.2455
1220-13-008C 58,240.4476 1.337 220-04-014H 23,950.2288 0.5498 220-04-016A 187,000.0172"1 •72
1220-07-001D 117,429.3069 04001 220-04-014P 34,763.3068 0.7981
220-04-0140 34,774.6578 0.7903
220-04-0111 85,749.2719 1.9915
220-13-007E1 22,712.7049 0.5214
220-13-007E 49,9125353 1.1458
220-13-006C 8,9592386 0.2057
220-07-001E [61.804 0.0014
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Case: Z2014012 – Superstition Manor
Meeting Date: June 11, 2015
Agenda Item: 1
Supervisor District: 2
Applicant/Owner: John Burns
Request: Major Amendment to Special Use Permit (Z2012086) for Superstition Manor
Site Location: Generally located at the northwest corner of Brown Rd. and Signal
Butte Rd. (in the east Mesa area).
Site Size: 6.2 acres
Density: N/A
County Island Status: N/A
County Plan: In Concert – Rural
Municipal Plan: City of Mesa Low Density Residential (0-1 d.u./ac.)
Municipal Comments: The use is not consistent with the City’s general plan and the City of
Mesa does not support the request for further expansion of the
existing use.
Support/Opposition: Applicant provided staff with 1 email of support, 2 petitions with 94
signatures of support and 9 signatures of opposition (not excluding
duplicates). 16 documents of opposition received by staff via email
(not excluding duplicates).
Recommendation: Deny as filed, approve with conditions for the following only:
parking reconfiguration/addition, offsite rental business as part of
SUP, additional 1,850 sq. ft. patio shade cover, altered R1-35
development standards for setbacks and perimeter wall height,
and increase hours of operation to 10:00 p.m. Sunday – Thursday.
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 1 of 17
Project Summary:
1. The applicant, John Burns, is requesting a Major Amendment to the existing Special Use
Permit (SUP) known as Superstition Manor. The original SUP (Z2012086) was approved to
allow assemblage of large groups of people to be used as a wedding reception/event
center. The existing 2.75 ac. property is located in an R1-35 zoning district, generally at
the northwest corner of Brown Rd. and Signal Butte Rd. in the east Mesa area. This case
was originally withdrawn by the applicant on June 9, 2014 but was resumed when the
applicant re-filed for the Amendment on February 13, 2015.
2. The request for changes are outlined below as identified in the narrative report:
• Property expanded to 6.2 acres (gross) to allow for reconfiguration/addition of
parking and additional 5,000 sq. ft. storage building. All three parcels (220-04-
014G, portion of 220-04-013K, and 220-04-014Y) would be combined prior to
permits if changes are approved.
• Parking to be increased from 121 approved spaces to 151 (137 regular, 5 trailer, 6
handicap, and 3 limousine). The existing parking along the northern property line
of parcel #220-04-014Y will be removed and there would be landscaped
screening along this area and along the north side of parcel #220-04-014G
where the parking is being added and reconfigured.
• The 5,000 sq. ft. storage building (with bathroom) addition to a portion of parcel
#220-04-013K would be a storage unit for the owner’s offsite wedding material
rental business (approved as a Home Occupation through LU20130044).
• Addition a of two-story 8,116 sq. ft. “operations building” which would consist of
dish washing, laundry room, floral, and storage area. Second floor would include
a “grooms suite” with shower and bathrooms (Note: this proposed building
appears to extend around the existing wedding center and possibly connect to
the existing game room as shown in the site plan).
• Addition of two patio shade areas (1,157 sq. ft. and 1,850 sq. ft.) which would be
adjacent to the proposed “operations building” and existing wedding center.
• Clarification that the 250 person occupancy limit includes employees, vendors,
and residents.
• Increase hours of operation to 10:00 p.m. Sunday – Thursday (currently approved
until 9:00 p.m.). The applicant mentions that the increase by one hour for each
day would allow for guests to depart from the event.
• Increase the SUP to 15 years from BOS approval date of this Major Amendment
(SUP was approved for 10 years from March 27, 2013 BOS approval of original
SUP).
• Light background music not to exceed 55 db at the property line to comply with
Maricopa County Noise Ordinance. No PA system other than actual wedding
ceremony.
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 2 of 17
• Alter R1-35 zoning district standards to allow for the following:
1. Existing 400 sq. ft. gazebo to be allowed within front yard setback of Signal
Butte Road showing as 31’ setback from eastern property line. This was
caused when a VNAE was placed on Brown Rd. and created the front
setback of 40’ on Signal Butte Rd.
2. Existing structure (wedding and event center) to stay at its current setback
of 20’. This was approved at the 20’ setback from the original SUP
(Z2012086) and is not an issue. If proposed 8,116 sq. ft. building is to be
approved, there would only be a 10’ setback to the rear of the parcel as
it is currently configured. As mentioned previously, the owner would need
to combine these parcels to meet setbacks.
3. Increase CMU block walls to be maximum of 8’ (h).
• Include the offsite rental business as part of the SUP entitlement.
Public Participation Summary:
3. The applicant posted the property and notified all property owners within 300’ of the
subject site and parties of interest, in accordance with the Maricopa County’s Citizen
Review process. The applicant has provided staff with notification of minutes of a
neighborhood meeting that was held on Monday, April 6, 2015. The minutes indicated
that the meeting lasted from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. where 15 people were in
attendance. After the meeting minutes were made available, staff received three
emails from attendees detailing the discrepancies in the minutes provided by the
applicant and what actually happened at the meeting. These emails, sign-in sheets,
and the minutes are included as supplemental to this report.
4. Since the applicant resubmitted for this case on February 13, 2015, staff has received 1
email of support, 2 petitions with 94 signatures of support, and 9 signatures of opposition
all provided by the applicant (not excluding duplicates). Staff also received 16
documents of opposition by email (not excluding duplicates). All support material was
given to staff by the applicant with support from 300’ neighbors in support submitted in
petition form. Primary concerns with the proposed changes are increased traffic, noise
issues, and expanded commercial operation in a residential neighborhood.
Background:
5. March 27, 2013: The Board of Supervisors approved SUP case #Z2012086 to allow for
assemblage of large groups of people to be used as a wedding reception/event
center. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
a. Development of the site shall comply with the Site Plan entitled “Superstition
Manor”, consisting of two (2) full-size sheets, dated January 10, 2013, and
stamped received January 11, 2013 except as modified by the following
conditions. Within 30 days of Board of Supervisor’s approval, the site plan shall
be revised to illustrate the following: 1) wall sign in conformance with the
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and 2) a landscape plan. A revised site
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 3 of 17
plan shall be provided within 30 days of Board approval that is consistent with
the following conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “SUP for Superstition Manor”, consisting of nine (9) pages, dated revised
March 25, 2013, and stamped received March 25, 2013, except as modified by
the following conditions. A revised narrative report shall be provided within 30
days of Board approval that is consistent with the following conditions.
c. All landscaping shall be installed prior to commencement of the use. All
landscaping shall be maintained and replaced as necessary to maintain the
integrity of the proposal for the life of the Special Use Permit.
d. Prior to commencement of the use, as required by the Development Services
Department a commercial remodeling building permit must be completed.
e. All transformers, back-flow prevention devices, utility boxes and all other utility
related ground mounted equipment shall be painted to complement the
development and shall be screened with landscape material where possible. All
HVAC units shall be ground-mounted or screened with a continuous parapet for
commercial projects.
f. All outdoor lighting shall conform to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
g. The hours of operation (open to the public) for this facility shall be restricted to
between 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 11:00
p.m. on Friday and Saturday.
h. The maximum number of people on the property at any one time is limited to
250. The Kitchen must obtain an appropriate food service permit prior to using
the kitchen for food preparation
i. Security and parking attendants shall be provided for every event over 150
guests.
j. Food permits and liquor licenses shall be obtained prior to each event as
appropriate.
k. No amplified music is permitted outside other than during a ceremony officiated
by an individual authorized to perform weddings. Amplified music inside shall
not extend past 9:00 p.m. Sunday – Thursday and 10:00 p.m. on Friday and
Saturday. Noise generated on site shall not exceed 55 dB measured at any of
the lot lines.
l. Outdoor parking lot lighting and wall lighting in excess of 60 watt incandescent
or equivalent lumens shall be fully shielded and directed downward. Parking lot
lighting and wall lighting shall be turned off within 30 minutes after the event. This
condition does not apply to outdoor light fixtures at the residential entrance to
the building.
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 4 of 17
m. No off-site parking is permitted.
n. Maricopa County Department of Transportation extends their recommendation
with the following conditions:
1. The owner shall provide a total half-width of right of way: Brown Road – 65
feet. All such dedications shall be in fee and free of all liens and
encumbrances. Prior to acceptance of such dedication, the owner shall
provide the County an owner’s title insurance policy issued to the county,
the MCDOT environmental checklist and any and all other requirements
as set forth in the “MCDOT Right of Way Dedications Reference Guide.”
Until Maricopa County has accepted said dedication, all responsibilities,
including but not limited to maintenance and repair for the property to be
dedicated shall be that of the owner. Right of way dedication shall occur
within six (6) months of approval of this requires by the Board of
Supervisors, and prior to zoning clearance.
2. Pave all portions of driveways located within County right of way. (Must
obtain MCDOT permit for all work within right-of- way.) Driveways must be
constructed to MCDOT standards.
o. Development of the site shall be in compliance with all applicable Maricopa
County Air Quality rules and regulations.
p. The following Drainage Review conditions shall apply:
1. The Owner or Owner’s Agent must apply for a permit for the storage
container shown on the Grading and Drainage Plan prior to or concurrent
with any building permit application for work on this site; or remove it from
the site.
2. The grading of the site must provide for positive drainage towards the
retention basin. At the time of application for building permits(s), the
Grading and Drainage Plan must be revised to eliminate local low points
within the site and demonstrate that flows from the site will be directed to
and retained in the retention basin.
3. At the time of application for building permit(s), the site cross sections
must be drawn to scale (exaggerated vertical (10x the horizontal scale))
and show existing and proposed grade elevations through the new
improvements (i.e. retention basin) on the site.
4. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with the
Drainage Regulations and design policies and standards.
5. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 5 of 17
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
q. This Special Use Permit shall expire ten (10) years from the date of approval by
the Board of Supervisors.
r. The applicant/owner shall submit a written report outlining the status of the
development annually from the date of approval by the Board of Supervisors.
The status report shall be reviewed by staff to determine whether the Special Use
Permit remains in compliance with the approved conditions. If the conditions of
Special Use Permit approval have not been maintained the matter may be
considered by the Board of Supervisors for revocation upon recommendation by
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
s. Amendments to the site plan and narrative report shall be processed as a
revised application in accordance with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
Article 304.9.
t. Noncompliance with the conditions of approval will be treated as a violation in
accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. Further,
noncompliance of the conditions of approval may be grounds for the Planning
and Zoning Commission to take action in accordance with Chapter 3
(Conditional Zoning).
u. Non-compliance with the regulations administered by the Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department, Maricopa County Department of
Transportation, Drainage Review Division, Planning and Development
Department, or the Flood Control District of Maricopa County may be grounds
for initiating a revocation of this Special Use Permit as set forth in the Maricopa
County Zoning Ordinance.
v. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval is
temporary and allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by
the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions and
stipulations. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition or
stipulation, and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property
shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore,
stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with
any conditions or stipulations, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does
not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell
or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such
revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit
enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special
Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of
the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted.
w. Event traffic exiting onto Signal Butte Road shall only be permitted turning right /
southbound. Applicant shall address by signage, striping or physical barrier.
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 6 of 17
6. April 26, 2013: A Residential Home Occupation Permit was approved (LU20130044) to
allow for “party rentals (chairs, tables, etc.) for pick up or deliveries for off-site
weddings” on the subject property.
7. November 21, 2013: Staff administratively approved case #Z2013113, an SUP Minor
Amendment adding a new gazebo, patio shade covers, rear building area to existing
ballroom, reduced the parking spaces from 120 to 108, an increase in perimeter wall
height to 8’ along the south lot line, a new interior 6’ CMU wall to shield parking from the
ceremony yard, and relocated the storage container. Approval was subject to the
following conditions:
a. Development and use of the site shall be in conformance with the site plan
entitled “Request for a Minor Amendment to Special Use Permit Case #
Z2012086,” consisting of two (2) sheets stamped and received November 20,
2013.
b. Development and use of the site shall be in conformance with the narrative
report entitled “Superstition Manor: Minor Amendment to SUP Z2012086,”
consisting of four (4) pages, stamped received November 20, 2013
c. All necessary building permits must be obtained for proposed changes.
d. The following standard Drainage Plan Review conditions will apply:
1. On site drainage conditions are to remain intact with all flows directed to
the existing retention basin.
2. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and the Maricopa
County Drainage Policies and Standards.
3. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
4. Detailed Grading and Drainage Plans showing the new site improvements
must be submitted for the acquisition of building permits.
e. The following MCESD conditions will apply:
1. Development and engineering design shall be in conformance with the
Maricopa County Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge
Control Regulation. If required, the owner/developer shall prepare a
SWPPP and obtain approval by MCESD prior to construction. (A separate
submittal to MCESD would be required.) If required, upon completion of
construction, the owner shall fulfill MCESD requirements and obtain a post-
construction stormwater permit.
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 7 of 17
2. If applicable, the site plan shall contain a note designating the entity
responsible for operation and maintenance of the on-lot stormwater
management facilities consistent with an approved operation and
maintenance plan.
f. Continued compliance with the stipulations of approval for Z2012086 as
applicable.
8. April 17, 2014: Staff administratively approved case #Z2014021, an SUP Minor
Amendment to expand kitchen facilities on site, and the addition of two new storage
buildings (replaced the existing storage container), change from a single driveway off
Signal Butte Rd. to a couplet with entrance and exit aisle, and increase perimeter wall
height to 8’ along the north property line. The approval was subject to the following
conditions:
a. Development and use of the site shall be in conformance with the site plan
entitled “Request for a Minor Amendment to Special Use Permit Case #
Z2014021,” consisting of two (2) sheets stamped and received March 28, 2014.
b. Development and use of the site shall be in conformance with the narrative
report entitled “Minor Amendment to SUP,” consisting of one (1) page, stamped
received March 28, 2014.
c. All necessary building permits must be obtained for proposed changes.
d. The following standard Drainage Plan Review conditions will apply:
1. On site drainage conditions are to remain intact with all flows directed to
the existing retention basin.
2. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and the Maricopa
County Drainage Policies and Standards.
3. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
4. Detailed Grading and Drainage Plans showing the new site improvements
must be submitted for the acquisition of building permits.
5. The subject property is not within a delineated 100 year (one percent
chance) floodplain. The proposed use would not be in conflict with any
existing or proposed Flood Control District projects. No objections are
raised with respect to floodplain management.
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 8 of 17
e. The following MCESD condition will apply:
1. Contact the MCESD Onsite Wastewater Program (602-506-0372) regarding
possible review or permit required for the dish room addition.
f. The following MCDOT conditions will apply:
1. Existing driveway access shall be depicted on the site plan to match
existing condition. Proposed driveway shall be designed to meet minimum
County Standards.
2. Roadway review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with Current
MCDOT Design Standards.
3. Detailed Plans showing the new improvements in the County right-of-way
must be submitted for the acquisition of building permits.
g. Continued compliance with the stipulations/conditions of approval for Z2012086
& Z2013113 as applicable.
9. February 13, 2015: Case Z2014012 was resumed by the applicant after being withdrawn
on June 8, 2014. Staff received resubmittal documents and distributed material to
reviewing agencies and Areas of Interest.
10. March 17, 2015: A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting was held to discuss
agency comments regarding the resubmittal of case Z2014012.
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
11. On-site: R1-35 & SUP/Superstition Manor Event Center
North: R1-35 /vacant land, single-family residence
South: Arterial, then Rural-43/ Brown Rd, then vacant land, single-family
residence
East: Arterial, then Rural-43/Signal Butte Rd., then vacant desert
West: R1-35/vacant land
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 9 of 17
Aerial of site and surrounding properties showing existing approved SUP area and proposed expansion
Adopted Plan:
12. East Mesa Area Plan: The Plan identifies the subject site for Rural uses. Rural uses allow
large assembly of people as a use in concert with the plan.
Utilities and Services:
13. Water: Arizona Water Company
Wastewater: On-site septic
Electric: Salt River Project (SRP)
School District: Mesa Public School
Fire: Rural/Metro Fire Department
Police: Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies:
14. N/A
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 10 of 17
Staff Analysis:
15. Staff supports the increase and reconfiguration of the parking to have a total of 151
parking spaces (137 regular parking spaces, 5 trailer parking spaces, 6 handicap
spaces, and 3 limousine spaces). The additional area for parking proposed just west of
the current manor site (current parcel #220-04-013G) is a good area for this use since
the location is under an SRP easement where there are existing power lines. Since
occupancy is not requested to be increased and the 250 allowed on-site includes
residents, vendors, guests, employees, etc. then the parking changes should not affect
the number of people allowed on-site.
16. The request for an additional 15 years from the BOS approval date is not supported by
staff. The original SUP (Z2012086) was approved as an “interim use” with a 10 year
timeframe and required status reports. The limited timeframe was approved due to the
public opposition received by staff during the SUP process. Staff believes this timeframe
is still adequate as the applicant has expanded the site with two Minor Amendments
and this request for Major Amendment in less than two years of SUP approval. As this
subject site becomes more commercial in nature, staff would like to see this use re-
evaluated when the SUP is closer to expiration to see if an extension is appropriate at
that time.
17. Staff will include a condition to the recommendation to have the off-site rental business
of wedding material as part of the SUP use of the site. The off-site rental business was
included as part of the “Description of Proposal” for the approved Narrative approved
by the BOS on 3/27/2013 for Z2012086. Staff is not in support of the proposed 5,000 sq. ft.
storage building relating to the off-site rental business as this would be an expansion of
the business to a warehouse type of use and further movement towards a commercial
zoning district type use.
18. The proposed “operations building” consisting of a two-story 8,116 sq. ft. dish washing,
laundry room, floral room, groom’s suite, and storage area and proposed attached
1,157 sq. ft. patio cover is not supported by staff. After staff visited Superstition Manor, it
was evident that storage space was becoming an issue. However, the applicant was
approved for a total of 3,400 sq. ft. which included a kitchen addition and two new
storage buildings with Minor Amendment (Z2014021). The applicant never built the
approved additions where the “operations building” and patio cover is now being
requested with a much larger area. Since the site plan approved for Z2014021 did not
include the 10’ PUE easement with the approved plan along the west portion of the
property, staff would have allowed a reconfiguration of the 3,400 sq. ft. approved to
meet zoning guidelines (as the proposed additions would be encroaching on the PUE).
The applicant never resubmitted a revised site plan for these acceptable changes.
Thus, staff is in favor of having the 3,400 sq. ft. approved previously through Z2014021
applied toward the storage building(s) and kitchen addition.
19. The requested 1,850 sq. ft. patio shade cover on the south side of the existing wedding
center building is supportable by staff. This is an existing outdoor area for seating and
will help with shading for guests of the facility.
20. Staff recommends reconfiguring the condition dealing with amplified music. Outdoor
amplified music or speakers will still not be permitted outside other than during the
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 11 of 17
ceremony by an individual authorized to perform weddings for maximum one hour
duration during daylight hours only. Noise generated on site shall not exceed 55 dB
average over a 10 minute period as measured outside the boundary of the Special Use
Permit.
21. A Vehicular Non-Access Easement (VNAE) was recorded on 11/24/2014 by the owner
of Superstition Manor along Brown Rd. on parcel #220-04-014Y. Maricopa County did
not want access off of Brown Rd. and the owner recorded the VNAE to assure that
access would not be allowed to the property through Brown Rd. This created setback
issues with R1-35 development standards since Signal Butte Rd. is considered the front of
the property due to the VNAE where a 40 ft. setback is needed; when before the VNAE,
20 ft. was allowed from Signal Butte Rd. as it was considered a street side. The existing
gazebo near Signal Butte Rd. is only 31 ft. from the east property line. The rear of the
existing wedding center building is around a 20 ft. setback from the west property line
(rear yard) where 40 ft. is also required. Staff recommends allowing a 20 ft. setback from
the property lines along Brown Rd. and Signal Butte Rd. and a rear setback of 20 ft. to
allow for the existing wedding center setback. If the expanded parking lot area is
approved by the BOS and the lots are combined, the setback for the rear will not be an
issue since this will alter the configuration of the parcel and the 107th St. portion of the
parcel will then be considered the rear.
22. Staff is in support of altering the R1-35 zoning standard to allow 8 ft. (h) solid walls along
lot lines. Staff believes this helps screening and buffering of the site. This increase in wall
height would help the site be more internalized and less of a distraction to surrounding
properties.
23. The increase of hours of operation to 10:00 p.m. Sunday – Thursday is supported by staff.
This is just to allow adequate time for guests to depart from the facility after the event.
Since music indoors is not allowed past 9:00 p.m. and outdoor music is not allowed at
this time, the time adjustment for departing the events is justified.
24. Staff received an email from the City of Mesa on March 18, 2014 when the Major
Amendment was first applied for. Their stance is stated as being very much opposed to
any further expansion of the current use at this location. Superstition Manor is part of the
City’s Desert Uplands area and their General Plan Designates the area for very low
density residential uses. City of Mesa responded to the Amendment changes on May
26, 2015 and stated that their position on the matter has not changed.
25. The applicant provided a memo from a deputy sheriff that has worked on events at the
Superstition Manor explaining observations during an event at the site. This is included as
a supplemental document to this report.
26. The narrative report also includes the annual Status Report due for the Superstition
Manor SUP. Staff accepts this report as part of this Major Amendment report.
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 12 of 17
Recommendation:
27. Staff recommends the Commission motion for denial as filed, and approval of only the
following requests relating to Z2014012:
• Increase and reconfiguration of the parking to have a total of 151 parking spaces
(137 regular parking spaces, 5 trailer parking spaces, 6 handicap spaces, and 3
limousine spaces).
• Off-site rental business of wedding material as part of the SUP use of the site.
• 1,850 sq. ft. patio shade cover on the south side of the existing wedding center
building.
• Allowing altered R1-35 development standards for the following: A 20 ft. setback
from the property lines along Brown Rd. and Signal Butte Rd. and a rear setback of
20 ft. to allow for the existing wedding center setback. Also, 8 ft. (h) solid walls along
lot lines.
• Increase of hours of operation to 10:00 p.m. Sunday – Thursday.
Subject to conditions ‘a’ through ‘x’:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan
entitled “Superstition Manor”, consisting of one (1) full-size sheet, dated April 24,
2015, and stamped received April 27, 2015, except as modified by the following
conditions. Within 30 days of Board of Supervisors’ approval, the site plan shall
be revised to delete the 5,000 sf new storage building and 8,116 sf new building
(addition) with grooms room, and 1,157 sf new patio cover – and replace with a
maximum building square footage of 3,400 sf aggregate additional building
space for storage and kitchen only (as approved previously).
b. Development of the site shall be in conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “SUP for Superstition Manor”, consisting of eight (8) pages, dated revised
May 22, 2015, and stamped received May 22, 2015, except as modified by the
following conditions. A revised narrative report shall be provided within 30 days
of Board approval that is consistent with the following conditions.
c. These listed conditions supersede all conditions of approval for Z2012086 as
amended Z20130113 & Z2014021.
d. The Special Use Permit is for a wedding/event reception center, catering, and
offsite event consulting and equipment rental. Said equipment rental shall be
limited to materials used at the Superstition Manor event center.
e. The Special Use Permit shall vary the R1-35 development standards to permit an
8’ high solid wall along all lot lines, and a 20’ minimum setback along the Brown
Rd and Signal Butte Rd street lines as well as a 20’ rear setback for the existing
wedding center buildings.
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 13 of 17
f. All landscaping shall be maintained and replaced as necessary to maintain the
integrity of the proposal for the life of the Special Use Permit.
g. All outdoor lighting shall conform to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
h. The hours of operation (open to the public) for this facility shall be restricted to
between 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to
11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. No business operations (cleaning, set up,
etc.) shall be conducted outside of these business hours.
i. The maximum number of people on the property at any one time is limited to
250. There shall be no more than 250 persons on site at any given time. This
includes guests, customers, staff, residents, visitors and any other persons.
j. Security and parking attendants shall be provided for every event (or
combination of concurrent/overlapping events) over 150 guests.
k. No amplified music or speakers are permitted outside other than during a
ceremony officiated by an individual authorized to perform weddings (maximum
duration one hour during daylight hours only). Amplified music inside shall not
extend past 9:00 p.m. Sunday – Thursday and 10:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday.
Noise generated on site shall not exceed 55 dB average over a 10 minute period
as measured outside the boundary of the special use permit.
l. Outdoor parking lot lighting and wall lighting in excess of 60 watt incandescent
or equivalent lumens shall be fully shielded and directed downward. Parking lot
lighting and wall lighting shall be turned off within 30 minutes after the event. This
condition does not apply to outdoor light fixtures at the residential entrance to
the building. There shall be no lighting on perimeter walls except at driveways.
m. The designated onsite parking area must be paved with marked spaces. All
guests, customers, customers, staff, residents, visitors and any other persons shall
park in the designated parking area and not on the adjacent streets, proximate
neighborhood streets, or offsite residential parcels; except that offsite event
parking at nonresidential properties is permitted with a valet or shuttle service.
n. Maricopa County Department of Transportation extends their recommendation
with the following conditions:
1. The plans show expansion of the SUP area for a distance of ±85 feet along
Brown Road (a minor arterial roadway). Dedication of 25’ (to provide a
65’ total half-width) along Brown Road is required and is shown on the
plan. Dedication of the required right-of-way shall occur prior to the
issuance of zoning clearance for any work on the site.
o. Development of the site shall be in compliance with all applicable Maricopa
County Air Quality rules and regulations.
p. The following Drainage Review conditions shall apply:
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 14 of 17
1. At the time of the application for building permits, the applicant shall
provide a design for the openings in the north wall such that historic flow
conditions are maintained.
2. At the time of the application for building permits, the applicant shall
provide calculations substantiating the design of the new drainage
improvements, including culverts, on the site.
3. At the time of the application for building permits, the applicant shall
provide required testing to demonstrate that the retention basins will drain
within 36 hours.
4. The new parking areas and storage building areas shall be graded such
that their runoff flows are directed to the new retention basin(s).
5. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and the Maricopa
County Drainage Policies and Standards.
6. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
7. Detailed Grading and Drainage Plans showing the new site improvements
must be submitted for the acquisition of building permits.
q. This Special Use Permit shall expire on March 27, 2023.
r. The applicant/owner shall submit a written report outlining the status of the
development annually from the date of approval by the Board of Supervisors.
The status report shall be reviewed by staff to determine whether the Special Use
Permit remains in compliance with the approved conditions. If the conditions of
Special Use Permit approval have not been maintained the matter may be
considered by the Board of Supervisors for revocation upon recommendation by
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
s. Amendments to the site plan and narrative report shall be processed as a
revised application in accordance with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
Article 304.9.
t. Noncompliance with the conditions of approval will be treated as a violation in
accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. Further,
noncompliance of the conditions of approval may be grounds for the Planning
and Zoning Commission to take action in accordance with Chapter 3
(Conditional Zoning).
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 15 of 17
u. Non-compliance with the regulations administered by the Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department, Maricopa County Department of
Transportation, Drainage Review Division, Planning and Development
Department, or the Flood Control District of Maricopa County may be grounds
for initiating a revocation of this Special Use Permit as set forth in the Maricopa
County Zoning Ordinance.
v. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval is
temporary and allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by
the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions and
stipulations. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition or
stipulation, and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property
shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore,
stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with
any conditions or stipulations, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does
not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell
or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such
revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit
enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special
Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of
the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted.
w. Event traffic exiting onto Signal Butte Road shall only be permitted turning right /
southbound. Applicant shall address by signage, striping or physical barrier. There
shall be no event traffic ingress/egress from Brown Rd. There shall be no event
traffic ingress/egress onto 107th St other than for the purpose of secondary
emergency access.
x. The following MCESD conditions will apply:
1. Contact the Onsite Program (602-506-0372) for possible septic permitting
requirements associated with the expansion (new building up to 6,000 sq.
ft. and 5,000 sq. ft. storage building).
2. Development and engineering design shall be in conformance with the
Maricopa County Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge
Control Regulation. If required, the owner/developer shall prepare a
SWPPP and obtain approval by MCESD prior to construction. (A separate
submittal to MCESD would be required.) If required, upon completion of
construction, the owner shall fulfill MCESD requirements and obtain a post-
construction stormwater permit.
3. If applicable, the site plan shall contain a note designating the entity
responsible for operation and maintenance of the on-lot stormwater
management facilities consistent with an approved operation and
maintenance plan.
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 16 of 17
Presented by: Ray Banker, Planner
Reviewed by: Matthew Holm, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor
Attachments: Case Map (1 page)
Vicinity Map (1 page)
Site Plan (reduced 8.5”x11”, 1 page)
Proposed elevation plans/floor plans of building additions (3 pages)
Narrative Report (8 pages)
TAC Routing Memo (1 page)
Engineering comments (2 pages)
MCESD comments (1 page)
City of Mesa comments (2 pages)
Sheriff’s Memo (4 pages)
Public Meeting Minutes (4 pages)
Documents of opposition and support (45 pages)
Agenda Item: 1 – Z2014012
Page 17 of 17
ONE
MARICOPA COUNTY STOP
SHOP
_
'
- , W
_ ':% t
, 4 f 4
4
,
k
' * '-`#
r, r 4 *
* It '
, )
,0V
A +10
q i
• ,.-
c
't I. t IS i 1
, LI 6
r ' 4 4 t
4., r.
#10 V 0 i
t '1:4 v* . 1 I e 0
,
6 . .
--, 1. '-
Err )/' n H (J -
....,.. ___ _
__...t
-
.6
, I t, t
I
* # . _
r r .
«
t
-. . ' -
J.', ._ 4, s Viik
filt-Li ms
Application Name: SUPERSTITION MANOR MAJOR AMENDMENT
Legal Description
TO1N RO7E 011,T1N RO7E 11
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
JOHN A BURNS 480.560,4390
JOHN@SUPERSTITIONMANOR.COM
Case Address Parcel Primary: 220-04-014Y Z2014012
1220 N SIGNAL BUTTE Rd
MESA AZ 85207 220-04-013G,220-04-013K
Generated May 28, 2015 10:03:10 AM Gross acres: 7 approx. Map scale: 1:2,400
Aerials Sep-Oct 2011
Supervisor District No. 2
SUP MAJOR AMENDMENT
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ
ONE
MARICOPA COUNTY ST ;P
SHOP
OM- 04413
12E,
0112f
22D-1144114
0-04-012A,
220-13AILD 22C, 13-11-0C 220-IRAftliF 220-074026
220-4 -0013r
220.411-3-0D5E 22043- 70 220-07-0 220-07-002E
720-117- A -07-010A
Application Name: SUPERSTITION MANOR MAJOR AMENDMENT
Legal Description
TO1N ROTE 011,T1N RO7E 11
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
JOHN A BURNS 480.560.4390
JOHN@SUPERSTTTIONMANOR.COM
Case Address Parcel Primary: 220-04-014Y Z2014012
1220 N SIGNAL BUTTE Rd
MESA AZ 85207 220-04-013G,220-04-013K
Generated May 28, 2015 10:03:45 AM Gross acres: 7 approx. Map scale: 1:3,600
Aerials Sep-Oct 2011
Supervisor District No. 2
SUP MAJOR AMENDMENT
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ
Prt:440-6004131•00a*.0e0000 341014V10.MBSIONALBUTRBR, A141201th I.O.DOPACMire, M.
14.124•SEEBANAPP000•M2ld BOX P.O. UMW. 11.010AL 1W
ARCHMECTUREI RESIDENCE CENTER! RECEPTION
11 CENTER EVENT - MANOR SUPERSTITION
93e, I STUDIO MCS
ADDMON STORAGE LINEN and "DISHVVASHING
or IAA 112111.10.1.1.FraBEL oillarr 1TE tsg
luEIRRO,
IPLTFICOP
P.a.a TO shad:. AMMON PL.
00(000438
LEGE,. rrg414°Zr,r62;!*&"..7i.r4.-'". Ongry.,,e,eteammenxvraTAme
SCALE SN008TEN MEM_
NOT PT
__Q DO a. • Tm C)
hIAIIVITNAN,TTALP
CO
2015
—
9
2
BUILDING MAY
STORAGE
and RECEIVED
ROOM
DISH
PLAN
FLOOR
,00PASUir,
DETAIL
f±ta NAIL.
LEGEND MAHE!, TRAMP,
HALL
WALL DESCRIPTION GNP OPTZILIGR.I.CA la1000
THY..g TITERIL,
P, rill TO
SYMBOL
CohlUPOP.
alrr
NARRATIVE REPORT
SUP for Superstition Manor
Case No Z2014012 Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte Rd
Mesa, Arizona 85207
Submitted /20/2014
Revision 1/12/2 015
Revision 1/2015
Revision 4r3/201
A
Nei0 borhood Meeting
4/6/2015
Revision 4/7/2015
Existing 71 m
Site 4 Revision 4/21/2015
New acres IN Pel 0 Revision 4/24/2015
for I
proposed parking Fi5 Revision 5/20/2015
4 Brown Road pp Revision 2/2015
V
RECEIVED MAY 2 220151
Introduction
Mr. John Burns ("Owner") requests a Major Amendment to their Special Use Permit ("SUP"). The subject
property is located at the northwest corner of Brown Road and Signal Butte Road in unincorporated Maricopa
County and further identified as APN 220-04-014Y
The Property consists of approximately 5.16 acres and is improved with an approximately 20,000 square
foot building consisting of two reception halls, bridal suits, two kitchens, four ADA bathrooms, two bridal yards
with gazebos, landscaping and garden area. He is requesting to add additional acres to the property the property was
acquired by the Owner through a foreclosure sale. The Owner has invested over 2.5 Million dollars to finish the
property improvements that were started by the previous owner as well as additions to the property. The facility
specializes in wedding ceremonies, and receptions. This facility is a non-denomination facility and accepts all
religions. Over 200 bride and grooms have exchanged their vows at Superstition Manor and over 100 have booked
for 2015 with sixty more in 2016 and 2017. The owner has also donated the hall to the East Valley Sun Devils (kid's
football), Halos (little league baseball), Skyline High School senior football banquet, and political events. We have
donated our hall to the needy for funeral receptions and fund raisers for cancer patients. We are very giving back to
the community and the needy. Superstition Manor has become a vendor to Mesa School District and JR ROTC will
hold their Awards Banquet in early April 2015.
Purpose of Request- Changes to original SUP approval and site plan
The owners, after 2 years of operating, have determined that they need changes to original
SUP so their business can operate more efficiently.
1. Property to be expanded 224,968 square ft (net)or 5.1645 acres or 269,022square ft (gross) 6.1759 acres
west parcel # 220-04-0140 and 80 ft of parcel # 220-04-013K. Combined new legal description filed
ASAP upon approval. All parcels will be combined into one parcel.
2. Operations building that will consist of dish washing, laundry room, floral, and storage with upstairs being
for grooms suites with shower and bathrooms also hair and makeup 8116 square ft two story. Under roof
4058 square ft. Patio 1157 square ft shade covers on the new operations building. Entire length of
building, to match existing roof. Construction to begin approximately 11/1/2015 and end approximately
2/1/2016.
3. 20 ft landscaping buffer with curbing, down north side of existing parcel # 220-04-0130 and it 220-04-
014Y to restrict any parking along north property line. Construction to begin approximately 9/1/2015 and
end approximately 11/1/2015.
4. Storage building with bathroom for offsite rental business 5000 square ft. Located on 80ft of parcel # 220-
04-013K. Construction to begin approximately 1/1/2016 and end approximately 4/1/2016.
5. Patio shade covers on main building south side patio. 1850 square ft of roof. Construction to begin
approximately 8/1/2015 and end approximately 10/1/2015.
6. Parking spaces, valet, oversized vehicles, vendors, guests and employees. These spaces will consist of:
Parking Graph
Approved SUP #Z2013113 Proposed Additional spaces
Regular 112 137 25
Trailer Parking Spaces 5 5
Handicaps 6 6 0
Limousine Parking Spaces 3 3
Total 121 151 30
a. There will be no parking within 20 ft of north property lines
b. parking spaces shall be marked or lined with 4" of recycled asphalt for dust control.
c. no parking signs shall be posted on north property buffer
7. Increase the block wall on Signal Butte Road to six feet in front of parking area to further screen parking
lot from neighbors. All other pertinent walls will be 8' and 42" at front of gazebo.
8. 250 occupancy includes employees, vendors, or residents.
9. Increase flours of operation to 10:00pm Sunday —Thursday for exiting only
Hours of Operation
Approved SUP Proposed
Sunday —Thursday 9:00atn-9:00pm 9:00pm-10:00pm guests to depart
Friday-Saturday 9:00am-10;00pm 10;00pm -11;00pm guest to depart
10. Increase to a 15 year SUP. Renewal upon application for an additional 15 years. 15 years from new date of
approval.
11. Light background music not to exceed 55 db at the property line to comply with Maricopa County Noise
Ordinance. No PA system other then actual wedding ceremony. (Technical correction)
12. Zoning district standards R1-35 to be altered for the below reasons.
a. Gazebo on Signal Butte Road had adequate setbacks of 24' until front yard was relocated to Signal
Butte Road and side yard to Brown Road. A none vehicular easement was placed on Brown Road
b. Rear building set back of main structure, with current parcel is only 20' from property line, again when
the above easement was placed, caused this issue. If property is expanded with the additional acreage this
will correct itself
c. Block wail in front yard that borders parking lot North is 8' tall request a variance for parking lot wall
in front yards to be at the maximum of 8' for screening.
13. Entire property and residence to be used for Wedding and Event Center, catering, and off site event rentals
Description of Proposal
1. Proposed use: The primary purpose use of the property will be used for weddings and receptions. Other
events such as family reunions, corporate functions and similar uses are also permitted but the primary use is
for weddings and receptions.
2. The facility will accommodate weddings receptions and other events. Each individual event will have the
option to either contract with Superstition Manor to provide catering and food services or to hire outside
catering along with other vendors such as photographers, disc jockey's, wedding officiate and other
consultants or contractors necessary for their event. Superstition Manor has acquired all the necessary
permits through the appropriate County and State agencies for the kitchen and alcohol services. Additional
services will be contracted separately by the renter of the facility and provided by those who are license by
the appropriate jurisdiction for food and beverage services. Superstition Manor may apply and obtain a
liquor license if so desired. When alcohol is being served at an event on the property, Superstition Manor
will provide the necessary security.
3. In addition to the wedding and event services offered on-site, the Owner also provides wedding and event
services off-site. Customers can rent from Superstition Manor tables, chairs, linens, consulting services, etc.
and Superstition Manor can provide handle of the details for the wedding or other event at an off-site
location (in a backyard, convention, center, ballroom or other venue).
4. Hours/Days of Operations: The facility is proposed to be available for use seven (7) days per week
between the hours of 9:00am to 10:00pm Sunday through Thursday and 9:00am-11:00pm on Fridays and
Saturdays. Currently hours of operation are 9:00am-9:00pm Sunday —Thursday and 9:00am-11:00pm
Friday-Saturday. Most events will occur on the weekends in the early afternoon and evening times. Guest
will exit no later than 10:00pm Sunday thru Thursday and 11:00pm Friday and Saturdays. only during the
wedding ceremony can the amplified music exceed 55db for one hour. Amplified music inside shall not
extend past 9:00pm Sunday through Thursday and 10:00pm Friday and Saturday. The noise generated on
site shall not exceed 55db measured at any of the property lines except during the ceremony. All other
outside music will be light back ground music maintained at 55db at the property lines and shall abide by the
Maricopa County Noise Ordinance. There will continue to be employees on-site after the end of the event to
clean and lock up the facility. .
5. Noise: The proposed use will comply with the Maricopa County Noise Ordinance (P-23). In order to
mitigate sound and noise on the property the following steps have been or will be taken: The site is
surrounded on three sides by an eight (8) foot block wall which will help to reduce the amount of noise
trespass from the property. Additionally the site has been designed to keep the outdoor noise generating uses
(such as weddings) as far from the residential uses as possible. The outdoor garden areas where the wedding
ceremonies will take place is located on the southern portion of the property, adjacent to Brown Road and in
center part of property. The outdoor garden area will be able to accommodate events other than wedding
ceremonies such as sit-down dinners, but the noise in the outdoor areas will be limited to soft background
music while the louder amplified music will be located inside the reception hall, which is inside the building
located on the property. The facility will also allow low level outside amplified wedding processional music
during the wedding ceremony. The property owner agrees that no amplified music shall be generated on site
during any wedding or event that will be greater than the County Code of 55db at the property line. The
ambient noise levels from Brown Road which is typically 80db will be louder than that outdoor uses
proposed for the property and therefore the noise generated onside will be negligible to the surrounding
properties and property owners. Enclosed is an expert analysis of proposed changes and existing screening
for noise abatement.
6. Parking: It is anticipated that the occupancy for the facility will be 250 guest, employee and vendors.
Because the proposed use is not clearly defined in the County's Zoning Ordinance, there are subsequently no
parking standards found in the Zoning Ordinance for this use. With Superstition Manor at its two year
anniversary of operating they have determined that the listed parking spaces will accommodate the guests,
employees, vendors and oversize vehicles with trailers. Parking spaces shall be marked or lined. Superstition
Manor will have:
Regular 137
Trailer Parking Spaces 5
Handicaps 6
Limousine Parking Spaces 3
Total 151
For a total of 151 parking spaces and will accommodate 250 people. Parking attendants win be provided by
Superstition Manor for every event over 150 guests, in order to direct arriving guest where to park as they
enter the facility. A stationary sign is posted at the exit of the parking lot to indicated "No Left Turn", A
separate exit has been developed for right exit only onto Signal Butte with signs posted. The owner has also
invested in signage for "slow children at play". He has also worked with local horse owners to give them
access across his property to the riding trails and a watering hole for the horses.
The parking field is currently covered with a 4" reprocessed asphalt base in order to provide proper dust
mitigation on the property. Additionally, the ADA parking spaces have been paved with the necessary
asphalt or concrete base and will comply with ADA requirements. Parking lot attendants will continue to
stay in the parking lot to insure that all guest only turn south onto Signal Butte and that there is no
unnecessary loitering or noise in the parking lot.
7. Number of employees: There will be 10 to 12 employees who will work at the property full time. These
employees will consist of wedding and event managers, office staff, and a landscape/maintenance
technician. In addition to the full time employees, there will also be approximately 10-15 part time
employees who will come before the event for set-up and after for clean up. Other part time employees may
be on-site during an event to act as parking attendants, and security (when necessary) for an event on the
property. It is anticipated that no more than 10-15 part time employees will be required on the property
during an event or function. In addition to those employed by Superstition Manor, there will be outside
contractors and vendors who will work on-site during a particular event but will not be employed by
Superstition Manor.
8. Description of Building: The existing building on-site is approximately 20,000 square feet in size and is
designed for and suitable to accommodate large events such as weddings, reception as proposed as part of
the SUP application.
9. Screening and Fencing: There is an existing CMU wall on all sides of the property. In addition to the wall,
the Owner had planted new trees along the South, West, and North sides to provide additional screening for
both the residential uses to the north and west and the arterial street to the south. The site was originally built
with a 6 foot screen wall around the site that currently exists. Portions of the wall along the east side were
reduced to 3 feet at the direction of Maricopa County to comply with all code requirements. The owner has
installed interior walls to further screen events from neighbors. With the addition of approximately 2.5 acres
to the west the owner's purpose is to install an eight (8) foot CMU wall and additional trees to screen from
the neighbors. In addition to the wall, the owner purposes to relocate all north parking spaces from current
parking lot to the new 2.5 acres to put a twenty foot landscape barrier for all north neighbors. This additional
screening will prevent disturbance to the north neighbors. All other neighbors are bordering a major road.
An existing 8' wall borders the southern property line to further screen the south neighbors and brown road.
In addition, an interior 8' CMU wall on the exiting northwest corner existing 3 acres to additionally screen
the north neighbors. Additional trees and 8ft SMV wall will be added along the SRP easement to the north
of the property for additional screening.
10. Lighting: All light shall be residential lot leveling lighting consistent with the high quality residential feel of
the facility. Existing lighting fixtures will remain throughout the site, which are primarily found attached to
the building, perimeter walls and in the garden areas and are accent lighting. New parking area lighting is
proposed to be similar in style and design to the existing wail and sconce lighting but will be on a post
approximately 6-8" in height in the parking area. Parking lot and perimeter wall lights shall be fully
screened and shielding unless the bulbs used in the lights are 60 watt incandescent bulb or equivalent
lumens. There will be no lighting with in 15' of the northern property lines except low voltage landscaping
lighting. Conceptual samples of the existing and proposed site light are provided herein for reference.
Examples: Wall Lighting Attached to the building lighting
Relationship to Surrounding Properties
The larger area is primarily residential in nature, although the property is located on the immediate corner
of two arterial streets.
North: To the immediate north of the property are large parcels zoned for residential use. North of the parcels are
single-family residential homes.
East: To the east of the property is vacant land. It is also the location of the Superstition Airpark, where the remote
control aircrafts fly in and out of which generated very loud plane noises and the Horse Arena has a PA system and
amplified music outside.
South. The south of the site is Brown Road. South of Brown Road is property that is either vacant or developed for
single-family residential use.
West: To the west is an undeveloped land as well as single-family homes
Signage
This SUP also includes a wall sign for Superstition Manor. The wall area where the sign is located is 6'
high by 23' wide, with individual letters that are permanently affixed to the wall and do not exceed the height of the
Location and Accessibility
The subject property is located just minutes from two major freeways, the US-60 and the Loop 202, which
provide convenient access for quests visiting the property, the property is accessed from Signal Butte Road, as
demonstrated on the site plan.
Circulation System
As demonstrated on the site plan, adequate access, parking and drive aisles have been provided to allow
traffic to circulate safely and efficiently both as guest arrive to the property and once they are on-site. The main
access to the site is from Signal Butte Road, which is a full movement, entrance and exit. In addition, there is a
secondary access at the northeast corner of the site on Signal Butte Road which is indentified on the site plan.
Future Expansion/Phasing
The site plan also identifies the expansion that was added to the north of the current building. The proposed
expansions are for the approximately 2.5 acres west of the facility to relocate parking spaces, add a storage building,
operations building, shade covers and additional screening.
Public Utilities and Services
Police: Maricopa County Sheriffs
Fire: Rural Metro
Water: Arizona Water Company
Electric: Salt River Project
Refuse: Waste Management
Schools: Mesa Public Schools
Phone/Cable: Cox Communications
Sewer: On-site Septic
Yearly status report of SUP# Z2012086
The following stipulation will be outlined and how we are complying with them.
/. Parking
a. Parking attendant is provided at each event over 150 guests.
b. Parking attendant are task with no loitering and or eating or drinking in parking lot area.
c. Parking spaces are an issue due to oversized vehicles/cowboy trucks that take up two spaces.
d. We have purchased a stretch limousine and a 2015 Ford Transit to pickup and drop off guests, from out of
town, staying at hotels.
2. Security
a. At each event over 150 guest or multiple events MCSO is contracted to provide security and traffic control.
b. In the 2 years, security had to get involved on one guest incident that was a law enforced issue.
3. No left turps onto Signal Butte Road
a. A sign has been posted at each exit.
Ii Security and parking attend are at exits to insure no left turns.
4. Amplified Music
a. Only during actual ceremony, by an officiator authorized to conduct such, is music amplified and it never
exceeds Maricopa County noise ordinance of 55 db at property lines.
b. No amplified music is conducted inside or out that violates county noise ordinance.
S. Occupancy
a. Events are maintained at a guest count that keeps occupancy at 250 including employees. Most events are
75-100 people.
6. Hours of Operation Sunday -Thursday lOarn to 9pm - Friday and Saturday 1,0am to 11pm
a. Music is off at 9pm Sunday-Thursday.
b. Music is off at lOpm Friday- Saturday.
c. Guest departure, Sunday-Thursday at the end of the event 9pm. Friday- Saturday lIpm.
7. Permits
a. Catering license is in place and quarterly inspections by Maricopa County Environmental Services are
conducted. We have an (A) rating since we started our catering with eight inspections conducted to date.
8. Noise abatement
a. We have planted more trees and raised our exterior walls to eight ft. Neighbors within the Property lines
have signed stating that there is no noise that is effecting their enjoyment of their homes.
9. Constructioh
a. There is no construction going on, on the property currently and no open permits. All permits have been
finalized and closed out. We were cited for raising a wall without a permit. This area was flood damaged and a
major repair was conducted after permit was issued, which had to be completed, to protect my property. I did
raise the wall and built up a bream to keep the major wash water from coming onto my property. In part this
damage is caused by the county having an improper sized culvert under Brown Road and not recognizing the
historic water flow. I have two 24" culverts and the county has only one 18" converts, this is a 30" difference
and the water from the 100 year flood damaged my property. This was taken to a hearing and I paid the fine.
As far as any other violations or issue we have none.
10. Events
a. We are currently booking for years 2016 and 2017. We have very few weekend dates available for 2015,
we are basically sold out. Primarily we do not due many events Monday - Thursday, except for schools or
youth league type events. Weddings are mostly Friday - Sunday.
11. Lighting
a. We use 60 watt incandescent bulbs.
We are currently going through a major amendment to our SUP to address some issues and to relocate a
portion of parking, additional buildings, occupancy, and hours.
We have complied with all stipulations and will continue to do so. There are some conflicting areas in original
approved SUP. However this major amendment addresses them and clarifies the issues.
Neighborhood Meeting & Neighbors in support
At our neighborhood meeting, held on April 6, 2015, no neighbor within 300' objected to our purposed
major amendment. Neighbors that border our current property and purposed acreage increase has signed a
petition and are in support. The following is a list of names and addresses that are in support.
Name Address Phone Proximity
Doug Henderson 1151 N 107th St, Mesa, AZ 480-710-9000 300'
Jordon Romero 1123 N 107th St Mesa, AZ 602-316-3833 600'
David Lawhead 1137 N 1070 St Mesa, AZ 480-209-4546 400'
Patricia Vanwagner 10638 E Brown Road, Mesa, AZ 480-274-9589 300'
Boyd Lee 1109 N 107th St Mesa, AZ 480-593-3508 900'
Tim (Castle Rock) 243 E Leland St, Mesa, AZ 602-361-1366 Property Line
Eiji Pollard 10735 E Glencove St, Mesa, AZ 480-580-5434 Property Line
Allen & Susie Baker 7841Dowell Rd, Mesa, AZ 480-986-2857 Property Line
John & Lisa Burns 1211 N 107th St, Mesa, AZ 480-560-4390 Property Line
John & Ann Ambrosia 1114 N 109th St, Mesa, AZ 480-233-3872 2000'
Jesus & KarMa Hernandez 1108N 109 th St, Mesa, AZ 480-358-9781 2000'
Colton Guitord 1121 N Signal Butte Rd, Mesa, AZ 435-602-0120 300'
Brian Rowland 1135N Signal Butte Rd, Mesa, AZ 480-390-8314 400'
The above neighbors have informed the owner, John Burns, that no music can be heard from Superstition Manor.
However the road traffic from Brown Road is heard more then anything. They also informed the owner that they
have never been in a traffic jam or congestion caused by Superstition Manor.
As the owner of Superstition Manor I would like to add that Thousands of guest have passed through the doors of
the manor. Hundreds of brides and grooms have started their married life and thousand and hundreds more will pass
through the doors. Superstition Manor and its owners believe in faith, family, and happiness. As you consider this
Major amendment please keep in mind that we are creating employment opportunities and creating growth in an
area that is struggling for jobs. Our expansion will give so much happiness on top of the overwhelming happiness
we already have given to so many brides, grooms and their families. The future development of this County Island
can help many who live here prosper and achieve their goals. This area is growing with homes but no commerce is
being added, So many have to travel many miles for employment.
Thank you for your consideration
John A. Burns
Bums Family Investments LLC
480-560-4390
Marie op a County
Planning & Development Department
Ray Banker, Planner DATE: March 2, 2015
501 Phoenix, N. 444 Arizona Street, 85008-6526 Suite 200 TO: DISTRIBUTION NOTED BELOW
Phone: (602) 506-2364
Fax: Rayraon(113anker@rnail.maricapa.goy (602) 506-3711 FROM: Ray Banker, Planner
wyrnaricopa.gov/planning RE: Superstition Manor- Major Amendment to SUP
CASE: Z2014012
Enclosed are the following materials relating to the above case date stamped
received February 13, 2015:
1) Narrative Report
2) Site Plan
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will hold a meeting to discuss the above
referenced case on Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 10:30 a.m., at the Maricopa
County Planning & Development Department, 1st Floor of 501 N. 44 th Street, in
Phoenix.
You, or your authorized representative, are invited to prepare and submit written
recommendations at the meeting. If you are unable to attend, please submit written
recommendations to our Department prior to the date of the meeting.
Please call me at 602-506-2364 (or email to
raymondbanker(@mail.maricopa.gov) if you have any questions. Thank you.
Distribution:
City of Mesa
Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO)
Rural/Metro Fire Department
East Valley Property Rights Coalition
Informational Purposes Only (memo only via e-mail):
John Burns (Applicant - Superstition Manor)
Bill Baggenstoss, Maricopa County Environmental Services (MCESD)
Karen Betancourt, Maricopa County Drainage Review
Wendy Downing, Maricopa County Addressing
Shiloh Johnson, Maricopa County Office of Enterprise Technology (OET)
Maricopa County
Planning & Development Department
Date: April 30, 2015
Robert Fedorka, P.E.
Planning &Development
501 North 44th Street, Suite 200 Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director, Department of Planning &
Phoenix, Arizona 85008 Development
Phone: (602) 506-7151
Fax: (602) 506-8762
unvw.maricopa.gov/planning Email address: Attn: Raymond Banker, Planner, Planning & Development Services
RoberlFedorkaOrnall.maricopa.gov
From: Robert Fedorka, P.E., Drainage Engineering Supervisor, Planning &
Development Services
cc: Michael Norris, P.E., Drainage Engineering Manager, Planning &
Development Services
Subject: Z2014012— Major Amendment to SUP — Superstition Manor
(D5 Memo)
Job Site Address: 10744 E. Brown Road, Mesa, AZ 85207
APN(s): 220-04-013G, 013K and 014Y
Drainage Engineering Review has reviewed the plans and narrative submittal date
stamped 04/27/2015 for this zoning case and has no objections.
Any approval of this case should include the following stipulations:
I. At the time of the application for building permits, the applicant shall provide a
design for the openings in the north wall such that historic flow conditions are
maintained.
2. At the time of the application for building permits, the applicant shall provide
calculations substantiating the design of the new drainage improvements,
including culverts, on the site.
3. At the time of the application for building permits, the applicant shall provide
required testing to demonstrate that the retention basins will drain within 36
hours.
4. The new parking areas and storage building areas shall be graded such that their
runoff flows are directed to the new retention basin(s).
5. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only
and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle applicants to
future designs that are not in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa
County Zoning Ordinance and the Maricopa County Drainage Policies and
Standards.
6. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current engineering
policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction.
7. Detailed Grading and Drainage Plans showing the new site improvements must
be submitted for the acquisition of building permits.
Following are comments from the Flood Control District of Maricopa County:
8. The subject property is not within a delineated 100 year (one percent chance)
floodplain. The proposed use would not be in conflict with any existing or
proposed Flood Control District projects. No objections are raised with respect
to floodplain management.
Following are comments from MCDOT
9. The plans show expansion of the SUP area for a distance of ±85 feet along
Brown Road (a minor arterial roadway). Dedication of 25' (to provide a 65' total
half-width) along Brown Road is required and is shown on the plan. Dedication
of the required right-of-way shall occur prior to the issuance of zoning clearance
for any work on the site.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require clarification of these
comments.
Maricopa County
Environmental Services
Department
-ma "ILATol arma•-rif
Subdivision, Infrastructure. & DATE: May 4, 2015
Planning Program
1001 N. Central Avenue #150
Phoenix, Arixona 85004 TO: Raymond Banker, Planning & Development Dept.
Phone: (602) 506-4058 Planner
Fax: (602) 506-5813
TDD 602 506 6704
FROM: Souren Naradikian, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Superstition Manor SUP Major Amendment Revision 3; Z2014012
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has reviewed documents
received from the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department for the above
referenced project. This project is a request for changes to the Special Use Permit (SUP)
Z2012086 for the proposed Superstition Manor banquet hall, reception center, and wedding
center. The changes consist of the addition of parking and walking trails. The facility is
located in an existing home site at 10744 East Brown Road near Mesa. According to
previously submitted documents, the facility will have a maximum capacity of 250 attendees.
Potable water is to be provided by Arizona Water Company, Sanitary sewage is managed by
an existing septic systems (MCESD #130387 and #131073). The site is in the urbanized
area regulated by the Maricopa County Stormwater Quality Program and the project may
disturb over one acre of land.
Based on the above, MCESD raised no objection to this project to the Planning &
Development Department in Accela Automation on May 4, 2015 and the project may proceed
at this time subject to the following stipulations:
Stipulations:
Contact the Onsite Program (602-506-0372) for possible septic permitting
requirements associated with the expansion (new building up to 6,000 sf and
5.000 sf storage building).
Development and engineering design shall be in conformance with the Maricopa
County Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Regulation. If
required, the owner/developer shall prepare a SWPPP and obtain approval by
MCESD prior to construction. (A separate submittal to MCESD would be required.)
If required, upon completion of construction, the owner shall fulfill MCESD
requirements and obtain a post-construction stormwater permit.
If applicable, the site plan shall contain a note designating the entity responsible
for operation and maintenance of the on-lot stormwater management facilities
consistent with an approved operation and maintenance plan.
It should be noted that several other Maricopa County agencies must review this project.
Final approval authority for this project rests with the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: John Wesley <John.Wesley@mesaaz.gov >
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 7:41 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLAN DEVX
Subject: RE: Maricopa County Case #Z2014012 (To Mesa Planning Department)
Ray-
Thanks for the follow up. Our position has not changed.
John D. Wesley, AICP
Planning Director
From: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX [mailto:RaymondBanker@mail.maricopa.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:36 PM
To: John Wesley
Subject: RE: Maricopa County Case #Z2014012 (To Mesa Planning Department)
Mr. Wesley,
I want to update you on this case as it is scheduled for the Planning and Zoning Commission (P812) on June 11, 2015. I
have attached the most recently revised Site Plan and Narrative that the applicant is requesting to be taken forward to
the hearing. I have your previous email on the original submittal as seen below and will include this as part of the staff
report. We understand City of Mesa's stance on the proposed changes to the Special Use Permit, and we would like
your further input on this request as it has changed significantly since the first submittal.
Sincerely,
Ray Banker
Planner
Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department
501 N. 44th St, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Office: (602) 506-2364
Email: RaymondBanker@mail.maricoba.gov
From: John Wesley [rnailto:John.WesleyOmesaaz.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 7:32 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Cc: Gordon Sheffield
Subject: FVV: Maricopa County Case #Z2014012 (To Mesa Planning Department
Mr. Banker-
The City of Mesa is very much opposed to any further expansion of this use at this location. This area is part of our
Desert Uplands area and our General Plan designates it for very low density residential uses. We opposed the original
request and believe that further expansion will be detrimental to the intended development type and character for this
area. Please keep us informed of the progress of this case.
John D. Wesley, AICP
Planning Director
City of Mesa
480-644-2181
From: Gordon Sheffield
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 6:13 PM
To: John Wesley
Subject: FW: Maricopa County Case 1122014012 (To Mesa Planning Department
FYI
Gordon Sheffield, AICP CNUa
Zoning/Civil Hearing Administrator
PO Box 1466, 55 N Center
Mesa, AZ 85211-1466
T 480-644-2199
F 480-644-2757
Gordon.Sheffieldmesaaz .9 ov
From: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX {mailto:RayrnondBankerPmail.maricopa.gov]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 3:24 PM
To: Planning Info
Cc: chuck fitzgeraldPrmetro.com
Subject: Maricopa County Case #Z2014012 (To Mesa Planning Department
Good afternoon,
As an Area of Interest for the jurisdiction of Maricopa County for the above referenced case, you are receiving this email
including the application, site plan, and narrative. I have been informed by the applicant that the provided material will
change in the near future and I will update you accordingly. We will schedule a Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
(TAC) at a later date. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns as this case moves forward.
Thank You,
Ray Banker
Planner
Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department
2
Raymond Banker - PLAN DEVX
From: Superstition Manor <john@superstitionmanor.com >
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 8:47 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX;
Della Davis - PLANDEVX; Charles Hart - PLANDEVX; Steve Chucri - DIST2X; Page
Gonzales - DIST2X; District 5
Subject: Fwd: RE:
Attachments: 201503311445.pdf; ATT00001.htm
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
This is from the supervising deputy sheriff who is an Internal affairs investigator with MCSO. We contact with
them for our security we don't do it ourselves. They have a copy of the SUP and ask by me to make sure it is
followed to the letter. They have been here for over a year every weekend. I do my best but Donald dollar and
Clarksons hate everything. I have met with neighbors and have received signatures to all the closest neighbors
and they say the following
1 never in traffic jam
2 never hear your events
3 don't even know when you having anything inside can't hear a thing
4 lights are so dim only 60 watt light bulbs.
I have been checked by county for my lights and noise. I even hired a noise engineer to issue a finding which
county has a copy. They state that noise can not be heard in any neighborhoods. I knew I would have issues
with some who tried to stop the SUP but to creat lies and constantly harassing me parking in front of my home
and business. My bedroom is in front and windows. Privacy should be my right and Donald dollar violates this
everyday. We practice free religion at the manor with prayer and family values of old school ways. My wife
was raised catholic and myself prodestant . We have religious ceremonies every weekend to celebrate two
people coming together as one. I personally officiant some wedding and I take it very offensive to Donald
dollars attacks on myself and manor. I hope this letter helps you to understand what they are doing.
John A. Burns
Superstition Manor
480-560-4390
Begin forwarded message:
From: Larry Kratzer - SHERIFFX <L_Kratzer MCS 0 .maricopa. gov>
Date: April 1, 2015 at 8:06:22 AM MST
To: Superstition Manor lohn@superstitionrnanor.cotn>
Subject: RE:
Here you go John. Sorry about that.
Lt. Larry Kratzer #1520
Maricopa County Sheriffs Office
To whom it may concern, 03/31/15
I have reviewed the email that Was submitted by a neighbor in regards to the Superstition
Manor venue located at 1220 N. Signal Butte Rd. in Mesa. I was surprised to hear of some of the
allegations that were made; many of which neither I, nor my co-workers have observed while
working in a security capacity for the venue throughout the past year. Since being contacted by
John Burns for off-duty Deputy Sheriffs personnel to work on site for weddings and receptions,
have worked withJohn to provide security for some of these events. John has instructed myself
and other deputies working to ensure that there are no traffic cOngestion on the roadway or
coming into the venue and stressed the fact that any and all vehicles for the venue needed to be
parked Within the property. John also made it clear that the noise level needed to remain within a
reasonable level and to let him, other staff, or the DJ know directly if' the noise level beeame top
loud. John also provided deputies working off-duty with a log to complete that would address
such issues. We were asked to complete these on a nightly basis when we worked an event. At
times, John would have two deputies work events if multiple weddings/receptions were
octurring. I am still actively working with John to schedule off-duty Deputies at the Superstition
Manor venue.
During the course of this past year I have personally worked on site at Superstition
Manor over 10 times, Each time I have worked there I have seen John andior Lisa on site
overseeing the event. John would ensure that he met with deputies to go over the event that
evening and make sure we knew what was expected. Generally speaking, I was able to utilize the
same group of about 4-5 deputies who began to know the venue very well and what the
expectations were of deputies while working. On most nights the deputy is staffed to be on-site
prior to the ingress of traffic arriving for the event that evening. The deputy has been tasked with
standing out in the parking lot and assisting staff from Superstition Manor with parking vehicles
that are coming in. The deputy is also tasked with observing traffic coming in to ensure there is
no delay or congestion on Signal Butte Rd. Once all vehicles have parked and the event begins,
the deputy walks around the venue and provides security. We have been tasked with doing
perimeter checks of the property and lot checks to ensure that the noise level from the music is at
a reasonable level. We have also been asked to ensure that people are not standing out in the
parking lot near neighbor's walls talking, which may cause a disturbance. In addition to, this, we
have been asked to check on the doors to the reception hall to make certain they are closed at all
times so that ambient noise does not carry outside. At the end of the evening when the event is
wrapping up, deputies have been tasked with monitoring the egress of traffic and ensuring that
vehicles are following the sign on the property that they can only turn right onto Signal Butte and
that no delay or congestion is being caused due to the egress. Once the event is over, which has
always been at 2200 hours or earlier since I have been there, the deputy is done.
The email that •I read indicates some things that 1 cannot answer to because I am not folly
aware of the situation that is being discussed. The parts of the email that I do have direct
knowledge awhile I was on-site myself or other deputies were on-site, such as doors slamming,
car alarms/locking mechanisms going off; dust being kicked up, amplified music playing outside,
traffic jams on Signal Butte Rd., dozens of cars parked on Signal Butte Rd., and shuttles bringing
guests into the verine when it is filled beyond capacity. In regards to doors slamming and car
alarms/mechanisms going off, the locking mechanism being audible and making noise may
occur while guests are coming and leaving. It is common for a horn to sound when a ear is
locked by a remote lock device. Most often, car locking mechanisms are not set to make an •
audible noise when being unlocked. The vehicles are generally on-site and coming in for an
event between 1530-1700 hours. Audible locking noises may be emitted at this time as guests go
into the event. The events typically end between 2100-2200 hours and guests ate not generally
coming in during this time. It has not been my observation that audibleunlocking mechanisms
are sounding at the end of the night since guests are leaving and not coming. This is not to say
that a car alarm has not inadvertently sounded or a guest has ran out to their car at some point in
the. evening to get something and had to relock their car, but it does not occur on a regular basis.
• Dust being kicked up has been observed due to the fact the lot is a rock/AB compound. I
have not noticed a significant issue with the dust from an event, but cars do tend td arrive
relatively close as the start time to an event gets near.
I' have not observed amplified music playing outside since I have worked at Superstition
Manor, nor have any of the other deputies, There have been times at the beginning of a reception,
typically between 1600-1800 hours, where light music is playing in the courtyard, but it is not
amplified and it cannot be heard from the parking lot, Any amplified Music is played indoors
during the reception. •
In regards to dozens of vehicles parking on Signal Butte Rd., neither I nor any of the
other deputies have ever noticed a single vehicle park on Signal Butte Rd. for the event, We are
diligent in making sure that all traffic for the venue parks within the lot. It has been our
experience that the staff has always been able to accommodate the vehicle traffic on the
" premises.
As it relates to congestion on Signal Butte Rd., neither myself or any of the other deputies
have observed any delays in traffic on Signal Butte Rd. or from guests coming into the event or
coming out of the event. Signal Butte Rd. in this area is a very rural road with extremely low
traffic volume. Never there were to be any sort of congestion on the roadway, deputies would
' act quickly in assisting the traffic into the venue and off of the roadway. Again, this has not
happened with any of the deputies who have worked at Superstition Manor,
' The email states that when the venue is full to capacity a shuttle will bring people in. I
have, not personally ever seen the event full to capacity nor have other deputies working. There
are shuttles that come from local hotels in the area to drop off guests that are staying at their
hotel, but even this has been known to only contain a very small amount of people. On most
occasions the shuttle will drop off 4-8 people. I am not aware of any situationin which the venue
was full and off-site parking occurred elsewhere and guests were shuttled in.
The lighting on site at Superstition Manor is addressed as an issue by the author of the
email. I have not seen the lighting from their vantage point, but from a security vantage point the
lighting is very dim. It is not overly bright. I do not have direct knowledge of the time the
lighting is turned off.
It has been the observation of myself and the other deputies that work in an off-duty
capacity that John Burns makes many attempts to mitigate concerns by the neighbors in the area.
I am aware that he has built taller walls and has taken measures to sound proof the walls of the
venue to help alleviate noise. Lie constantly stays in communication with deputies on site to
ensure that noise is kept to a minimum, that cars are parked in the lot, and that people are not
loitering in the parking lot. He seems to be open to doing what he can to make the situation work
for his venue and his neighbors.
Thank you,
Larry Kratzer
cOt'ir6Ctia0-/ife/ 6-Rjcia016 /7
1 220 a ilnaf @tate 01,0,az DILAct, dr,i5,",a, 85207
480-560-4890
Major Amendment Z20142014
Superstition Manor Neighborhood Meeting for SUP major amendment
4/6/2015
Meeting started at 6:00pm,ended at 7:30pm. We offered pizza, chips,
salsa, and soft drinks.
Minutes as follows:
The owner of Superstition Manor, John Burns. Introduced himself and
outlined the major amendment request by line item.
The concerns of the neighbors that attended this meeting were as
follows:
q. Why does Superstition Manor need to expand parking?
a. To accommodate oversized vehicles, such as motorhomes, large
trucks, employees, etc.
q. Why couldn't Superstition Manor exit or enter from Brown Road.
a. County will not allow access from Brown Road on original SUP. Going
to request on new amendment with the 20' PUE on southwest corner
of combined parcels.
RECEIVED APR Ii2fiti,
q. Maricopa CountyI ieriff vehicles parking under: ) parking signs on
Signal Butte Rd.
a. County was asked about this and the response was they have no
issue with it, it is a traffic deterrence.
q. Changes to amplified music.
a. Asking for light background music, but not to exceed county
ordinance, more of a clarification of what is amplified music.
q. Will there be extra staff for traffic control for these special events?
a. Yes security is contracted for anything over 150 guests.
q. Why are you asking for change in hours.
a. One hour Sunday —Thursday for guest departure.
q. Why don't you have any desert landscaping, such as cactus?
a. Personal preference, cactus verses trees and flowers
q. Is the deputies insured under Superstition Manor or County while on
duty at Superstition Manor.
a. Superstition Manor carries liability and workman's compensation and
the deputies are covered while on duty for Superstition Manor.
q. We seen people pulled alongside of Signal Butte Road relieving
themselves.
a. We provide bathrooms, so why would they leave the property to
relieve themselves alongside the road.
q. Are you going to ask for permission to set off fireworks.
a. No. We do not want the liability.
q. Expansions make you money. What does it do for the
community/neighborhood.
a. We give back to the community by offering events at discounted
prices. We make zero to little profit from these events. East Valley
Sundevils, JR ROTC, Boy Scouts, Skyline High School Football Banquet.
Also many of the bride and grooms are from the east valley.
q. When was your last request for driveway access from Brown Road.
a. Original SUP.
q. Are you regulated though the county, city or both.
a. We are regulated by the county.
q. What will be the sq footage of this new building.
a. Approximately 6000 sq ft, two stories.
q. Who lives in your residence.
a. Myself and my wife.
No one brought up the subject of traffic, or alcohol.
By the end of the meeting most concerns were addressed and all but 3
or so were in support of the changes for Superstition Manor.
Neighbors within 300 feet were present or have signed petition and
had no issues with our plans. Some neighbors, that are more than 300'
away and have been against the SUP from the beginning, started to nit
pick the issues. I had to stop the nitpicking, because it was upsetting
the people that are within the 300' and knew they were nitpicking, so
that it did not begin an argument between those who are in support
and those who do not. The neighbors that are not in support never will
be, they want everything to go away, Superstition Manor, the horse
arena, air park, etc.
Attendance:
Jeanne Kennedy Judy Schmier
Kirk Kennedy Scott Schmier
Jeff and Mary Ryar Jean Gleavey
Joe and Rachel Robanow Camille Clark
Brad and Stacy Buren Don Dahler
Gary Lindenmier Dave Bair
Larry and Karren Ayotte Carol & Doug Henderson
Nathan Wal
John Burns
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Judith Schmier <cdnjudi@hotmail.com >
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 11;13 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Cc: Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; chucri@maiLmaricopa.gov ; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX; Page
Gonzales - DIST2X; Donald Dahler
Subject: Superstition Manor-Case #Z2014012
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Dear Mr Banker: lam writing to inform you of our opposition to the Request Amendment to SUP
#Z2014012. We do not support any changes to the original SUP that was granted on March 27, 2013.
Mr Burns told me that he has spent a lot of money on his property and that he deserved the chance to make a
living. Yes, I believe we all deserve a chance to earn a decent living but not at the expense of others! He has
always told us what he thinks we want to hear, not what is actually going on. I guess he thinks that because
we do not have his money we are not as smart as he is. We also bought a property that was an eyesore to the
community and spent quite a bit of money fixing it up. Probably, percentage wise, based on our income, as
much as Mr Burns has. Just like his property, we had people living here only our unwanted house guests were
robbing the neighbors and what they could not sell they left in a room in the house. I have pictures of the
mess we bought. For that matter we had to get the police involved because when we pulled down a ceiling
we had a rainfall of checkbooks, license plates and syringes come down as well. However, right from the start
we were told that if we did anything without a permit we would be made to tear it down, pay a fine, apply for
the permit and start again! Because of this we checked on everything we did. This was in the early 90's but I
have been told that the permit laws have not changed, just that it is costlier and takes longer. We had to
abide by the law and I am curious as to why Mr Burns is not.
When Mr Burns had the neighborhood meeting before he was granted his SUP he told us he would be having
a couple of events a week and they would not run late as he and his family lived upstairs. When he was
granted his SUP we were told that he was running a Cottage Industry and was required to live on the
property. Well that did not last long and when we brought it up the law was changed. Once you have an SUP
you are no longer held to the laws that govern the Cottage Industry. So, I guess that means that if I want to
open a small business in my home and I live here I no longer need an SUP. I may not be the smartest tack in
the box but that is what it sounds like to me.
Thank You for Your Time
Scott E. Schmier & Judith H. Schmier
Parcel #220-02-032A
Parcel #220-02-011B
10344 [Jensen St
Mesa, AZ 85207
480-986-4290
1
IssueTrak # 82504 Page 1 of 2
Welcome Banker, Raymond Log Out Issue #
Home Main Menu
View Issue #82504
My IssueTrak
email issue
Issue Detail • od Huu
View
Add Note
Attachments Issue #: 82504
Next Action Last Name: LINDENMIER
Edit First Name: GARY
Close Citizen Phone Number: 480-800-7505
Close/Copy Information:
Email Address: lindenmieragric.risn.us
Submit Issue
Permit #: N/A details
Search Issues
Lookup Issue 4 Organization: Planning and Development history
Knowledge Base Submitted By: External user, END on 11:-Mar-2015 9:06AM history
Projects Division ID:
Reports Subject: FW: Question
Custom Reports
Description:
Log Out Submitted by direct email to rdsaithelpdesk@mall.maricopa.gov .
From: Gary Lindenrnier[SMTP:GARY.LINDENMIER4GRIC.NSN.US1
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 9:04:09 AM
To: pdcustomerservice
Cc: Beth Lindenrnier
Subject: Question
Auto forwarded by a Rule
The business located at the corner of Brown &. Signal Butte continues to expand
and add traffic to our intersection, We observed this notice placed up for the
citizens who live nearby to appear for a public meeting. Note that the acreage
requested (already being transformed) Is not listed. Nor is the date and time as
they are covered up.
As I understand the codes add laws I interpret "temporary" (as the owner has
expressed to the neighborhoods) and special use permitting as having a use
timeline, normally to not exceed 12 months without a renewal. The building of
walls, and changing of landscape is not temporary, but a permanent action.
Placing a commercial venue in a rural residential area (where several serious
accidents have occurred, Including at least one fatality) at this intersection with
one entrance/egress point, with the increased traffic potential without any road
improvements to accommodate the additional traffic on Signal Butte and Brown
roads, where vehicles awaiting entry into the parking lot for events block
thoroughfare access northbound on signal butte down to the Intersection and
beyond is not safe.
Road improvements should be made by the commercial property same as any
other builder or construction company has to do throughout the state.
This is no longer a "temporary" venue, there are events occurring almost
daily/nightly and every weekend. The property has expanded, adding structure
additions to the building and expanding to the west without adding additional
access or assisting the right of way for residents of the area.
There is a deputy (MCSO) vehicle there on weekends but no traffic control being
conducted at any time that we have driven through the area.
http://rdsa-ithelpdesk.plandevinaricopa.gov/CSIssue_View.asp?IssueNbr=82504 03/11/2015
Page 2 of 2
• IssueTrak # 82504
Please respond.
Very respectfully,
Gary Lindenmier
10725 E. McKellips Rd, Mesa, Az.
(480) 800-7505
This message contains confidential information and is Intended only For the
individual(s)named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately
by e-mail if you have received the e-mail by mistake
and permanently delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission
cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be
intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise
as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a
hard-copy version.
Contact Type: Email
Division Type: Development Services
SubType 1: Planning
SubType 2: Variances
SubType 3:
SubType 4:
Assigned To: CustomerService, PND on 11-Mar-2015 9:06AM details
Adj Time Open: 02:39
Attachments: Maricona County Notice Board.JPG 11-Mar-2015 9:06AM
Total Time Open: 02:39
Issue Status: Open history
Priority:
Responsibility
Next Action: Planning on 11-Mar-2015 9:51AM details
Supporting Info
Notes
Resolution Info
j:' Task AssignedTo Completed Time
www.ssuetrak.corn
IssueTrak 9.7- 08-Feb-2012 - Copyright © 2001-2012 IssueTrak, Inc.
I rria-r-irrola rrr -wirqiqiie. View '117.rqgliel\Thi'.=R704 03/11/2015
IssueTrak # 80556 Page 1 of 2
Welcome Banker, Raymond -":6- 0 Log Out Issue #
issueTrak
Home Main Menu
View Issue *80556
My IssueTrak email issue
Issue Detail
View
Add Note
Attachments Issue #: 80556
Next Action Last Name: CLARK
Edit First Name: CAMILLE
Close Citizen Phone Number: N/A
Clone/Copy Information:
Email Address: CAMILLECLARK24GMAIL,COM
Submit Issue Permit 4: N/A details
Search Issues
Organization: Planning and Development history
Lookup Issue #
Submitted By: External User, PNID on 11-Feb-2015 8:11AM history
Knowledge Base
Division ID:
Projects
Subject: FW: Superstition Manor
Reports
Custom Reports
Description: Submitted by direct email to rdsaithelpdesk@maiLmaricopa.gov ,
Log Out
From: PD ON CALL PLANNER[SMTP:PDPLANNER@MAIL.MARICOPA,GOV]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:08:24 AM
To: pdcustomerservice
Subject: FW: Superstition Manor
Auto forwarded by a Rule
From: Camille Clark[SMTP:CAMILLECLARK24@GMAIL.COMj
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:08:22 AM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER; Donald Dallier
Subject: Superstition Manor
Auto forwarded by a Rule
I oppose any further expansion of this venue. You gave him and inch and he is
taking a mile. It is like a greedy corporate entity in the middle of
residential,quiet,rural neighborhoods. Horses go by there all the time, Hikers
too. It is nothing but greed by Mr, Burns.
I am not a nearby neighbor but I oppose the principal of the thing.
Camille Clark
Contact Type: Email
Division Type: Development Services
SubType 1: Planning
SubType 2: Support/Opposition for a Project
SubType 3:
SubType 4:
Assigned To: CustomerService, PNID on 11-Feb-2015 8:11AM details
Adj Time Open: 01:00
Total Time Open: 01:00
Issue Status: Open history
Priority:
Responsibility
Next Action: Plannina on 11-Feb-2015 8:26AM details
Supporting Info
W. Notes
Resolution Info
anuir.STRque, View a seTss1iel\T3r40556 07111/2015
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Judith Schmier <cdnjudi@hatmail.com ›
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 1:28 PM
To: Steve Chucri DIST2X
Cc: Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX; Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Subject: CITIZENS PARTICIPATION MEETING—SUPERSTITION MANOR-CASE Z2014012
Follow tip Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Mr. Chu cri: I am writing in regard to the meeting that my husband and I attended on April 6th, 2015. First of
all, there were more people there than Mr Burns let on. There were at least two sign in sheets used as I handed
the person behind me a clean sheet because the one I signed was full. Also, I only heard three people say that
they did not have a problem with the changes, the opposite of what Mr Burns said. Mr burns said that if he had
known he would be unable to get a bank loan against the property with only a ten year SUP he would have
asked for a longer one originally! I seem to recall that he had asked for a fifteen year SUP but the board only
gave him a ten year one back in 2013. I asked Mr Burns two questions, both of which he chose to ignore--
11 Two years ago he said that what he had asked for at that time was all he would want, so I asked him if he
would be having another meeting in two years so we could do this all again!
2/ I asked how he could claim that he was not asking for an increase in guests when he does not want his family
and staff to be included in any head count!
He completely ignored me and went onto something else!
Also, he made mention to you that people brought up the Air Park and P & M Arena again. The only time P &
M Arena was brought up was by Mr Burns himself when he said that he has made arrangements with them to be
able to use their parking lot and will shuttle people to his place. This I know will never happen as, for one
thing, they need the parking for their events and most of his events will be at the same time as theirs. Also, after
being Treasurer for five years back in the late 80's early 90's and having to find insurance to cover the events I
know that their insurance would not cover something like that, unless things have drastically changed in the
insurance business! The Air Park was never brought up!
I thank you for you time and, whatever happens I hope we do not have to do this again in two years--but I will
not hold my breath!
Judith H Sclunier
Scott E Schmier
10344 E Jensen
Mesa, AZ 85207
480-986-4290
Parcel 4220-02-011B
Parcel #220-02-032A
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Superstition Manor <john@superstitionmanor.com >
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 6:27 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject: Fwd: Red Mountain Baseball
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Can you add this email as support bakers land borders all of the new area. SOO of the new parking area.
John A. Burns
Superstition Manor
480-560-4390
WWW.Superstitionmanor.com
Dreams,Family,Faith
Begin forwarded message:
From: Susan <susieq95@cox.net>
Date: April 26, 2015 at 7:56:51 PM MST
To: "Sohn I,superstitiomnanor.com " <Johngsuperstitionmanor.com >
Subject: Red Mountain Baseball
John, sorry I missed your recent meeting, was working late that day. Let me know if you have
any more petitions or anything to sign to support the cause. Thought I'd send you the 2015
banners and especially the one of Eliot you supported.
Thanks,
Susie Baker
Sent from my iPhone
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Karren <aplushorses©q.com >
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 12:07 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Steve Chucri BOS2
Cc: Donald Dahler
Subject: Superstition Manor request for amendment to SUP Case #Z2014012
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Dear Sirs,
Larry & Karren Ayotte...Parcel 220-07-026F....10831 E. Edgegrove St; Mesa, AZ 85207....480-354-9605
would like to state for
the record that the Minutes submitted by Mr. John Burns detailing the neighborhood meeting dated 04-06-2015
@ 6:30pm have some
significant discrepancies concerning the number of people who left the meeting still against the allowing of
expansion to the Manor.
He stated that there were "3" who were still against the expansion. The list he submitted for attendees of the
meeting failed to include
Mrs. Coreen Wax. She was present with her husband. Upon reviewing the list I can contest that the number of
folks against is closer
to "11. Only "2" of the neighbors within the 300' boundary attended the meeting. They are close personal
friends of Mr. Burns and reside
in the home just to the south of the Manor. They only stayed long enough to deride the folks against the Manor
& then excused themselves.
The majority of the people at the meeting were there because they do not want to see the expansion of this
"Cottage Industry" facility. Mr.
Bums stated that he needed to expand in order to be competitive with other Wedding Venues around the
vicinity. Those other venues are
"Commercial", and they have established themselves in a legitimate manner under "Commercial Zoning". I
believe that Mr. Bums is deceptive
in suggesting that his home business venture is or can be correctly sized for peaceful blending within what is
clearly a "Residentially Zoned"
neighborhood. Enlarging his facility under the guise of amendments to an existing SUP is simply backdoor
politics.
Mr. Bums stated that no issues were addressed concerning alcohol. That is because there was not a judicious
use of meeting time to allow for the
question, and Mr. Burns presided as the chairman in charge. The question still remains as to whether Mr. Burns
distributes alcohol during
his events under a liquor license. If he has a liquor license, doesn't he have to be "Commercial" to attain that
license?
Mr. Bums also included derogatory remarks concerning neighbors who "Nit Picked" the situation, claiming that
they were against the Air Park and
the Horse Arena. This is a terrible comparison. Neither of these facilities disrupt neighborhood moral in the
way that Mr. Burns does. Both
of these facilities went through legitimate channels to obtain and retain their right to location and activities
enjoyed by the greater neighborhoods
in the area. Mr. Burns is admittedly out for his own profit in the operation of his Event Center. Neither P&M
Trailriders, nor Arizona Model Aviators
make any personal profit, or for that matter profit enough to do more than maintain their facilities and
events. There is no credible rational for comparing
Superstition Manor to either of these other facilities, but Mr. Burns keeps throwing that in as though it some
how makes him more allowable within the
neighborhood.
Mr. Bums praised himself and his facility by telling us how many High School and sports type groups to which
he gives reduced rates. This is his proof that
he "contributes positively" to the neighborhood community. He said nothing about the swath of residents that
have been negatively effected by SRP's
sudden need to expand their easement rights because they realized that his facility was creating limited access to
their power line areas. Mr. Bums is not
concerned because he can afford to sign over square footage to SRP for compensation. But, many of the
extended neighbors to the west of Mr. Burns
do not have that luxury. The reduction of usable land on their properties means devaluation of their parcels,
with some of the folks finding that
their very residences now exist within the requested easement allowances. This is a very real and troubling
consequence of allowing the Superstition
Manor to exist and now expand under the pretense of an SUP within a residential neighborhood. The original
SUP was granted for 3 acres, not 5.5.
It was granted for the existing facility with some modifications, not 3 times the facility square footage and 2
times the septic system. It was granted for
a Wedding type venue, not car auctions, or political convention, or corporate extravaganzas. It sits in a
residential neighborhood, not on a golf course or
down town commercial property.
The crux of Mr. Bum's submitted minutes from the 4-645 meeting seemed to imply that "things were
explained" and "almost everyone was OK" with the
request for amendments to Mr. Burn's original SUP. I believe that is a misrepresentation of community
sentiment. Hopefully this correspondence will
represent a more accurate tone concerning the outcome of the open community meeting. Please hear our side,
and consider how you might feel if you owned
property in a Rural Residential Setting and had this facility encroaching on your life and serenity.
Thank you for your consideration,
Karren Ayotte
Parcel 220-07-026F
10831 E. Edgegrove St.
Mesa, AZ 85207
2
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:26 AM
To: Hugh Gleaves
Cc: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Subject: RE: Questions about case: 72014012
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Sir: the amendment to the Special Use Permit is being requested by Mr Burns. It must be legislatively approved by the
Board of Supervisors. Staff did ask him to host a neighborhood meeting to present what he is requesting. Staff will
consider your email a letter of opposition to the requested SUP amendment and will attach it to the staff report
presented at the Planning & Zoning Commission public hearing. Darren
Darrell V. Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director
Maricopa County Planning & Development Department
501 N. 44th St. #200 Phoenix, AZ 85008
602-506-7139, 602-506-3711 (fax)
darrengerard@mail.maricopa.gov
www.maricopa.gov/plaiming
Your feedback is important - Click HERE to let us know!
From: Hugh Gleaves [mailto:hugh gleavesOhotmail,com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:16 AM
To: Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject: Questions about case: 22014012
Dear Darren,
My name is Hugh Gleaves, I live at parcel: APN-220-04-010P with my wife Jean Gleaves.
I attended a meeting last night at the Superstition Manor premises (see relevant case notes), the meeting's
goal was to summarize the nature of a requested change to the special use permit already granted to the
business situated at that address and to provide a forum for concerns to be expressed and questions asked by
community residents.
I've identified a number of concerns and would like to ask you what options I have for raising objections and
requesting either a denial of the SUP request or at least some changes to its scope, I'd also like to ask who is
the preferred contact for this if not you?
I'd like to briefly summarize a couple of my concerns if I may in this initial e-mail to you.
1_ The application (the copy I was given anyway) attempts to justify the requested SUP changes by claiming
they are motivated by a desire to improve efficiency but none of the changes relate to efficiency but rather to
1
a desire to invest significantly in an expansion of services, guest numbers and so on. Such investment (e.g. two
6,000 sq/ft buildings) clearly demonstrates that the existing commercial activity is profitable and that the
business is healthy. If the changes were denied the business would not suffer or decline and the owner has the
option to invest in an expansion in an already commercially zoned location.
2. Several references were made by Mr. Burns to his desire that he be able to provide some 15 "special
events" which will see perhaps some 500+ guests with activity at the premises continuing to approx lam. This
equates to about one "special event" ever 24 days or so, more than once per month.
Mr. Burns stated that the meeting was not something he wanted to do but was rather done because the
county had asked him to do this. He further implied that at this stage it was considered that permission was
"more or less" granted and there was little to be done at this point to prevent the plans from being executed.
Not directly related to this case but also of concern, is the ongoing building work on (what he described as)
Mr. Burns' new home, parcel number: APN-220-04-012E. This construction is visible from my yard and I've
noticed several times trash and waste being burned, often all day and very close to the Signal Butte Floodway.
I'm concerned that this new property may become part of Mr Burns' planned business expansion, impacting
even more the quality and serenity of the locality.
In closing, my wife and 1 only recently moved into this area having relocated at significant personal expense
from Delaware, where similar commercialization of formerly residential areas was becoming more common. I
am astonished that an already successful enterprise like Superstition Manor is seeking to increase commercial
activities in an area zoned as residential and claiming that this is motivated by a desire to improve efficiency.
This change - if granted - can only lead to reduction in local property values, increases in traffic, increases in
noise and a reduction in the overall serenity of the neighborhood. Being permitted to play music (which
cannot be low volume if its to be audible with 500 people present) up until lam is also something I had not
expected when moving to this area of the state.
Any information on how best to take steps to impede this case and compel the owner to invest in growth in an
already designated commercial zone, will be appreciated, this application looks like a possible example of spot
zoning too. I notice too that construction work already appears to have started.
Sincerely,
Hugh Gleaves
2
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Donald Dahler <dp.dabler@q.com >
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2015 3:31 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX
Cc: Andrew Kunasek - DIST3X; Candice Copple - DIST1X; Clinton Hickman - DIST4X; Cristina
Arzaga-Williams DIST5X; Denny Barney - DIST1X; Kevin Tyne - DIST3X; Page Gonzales
- DIST2X; Steve Chucri - DIST2X; District 5
Subject: Opposition to Superstition Manor SUP expansion Case Z2014012
Attachments: 1 Hoskin 1.pdf; R Hoskin 1.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Attached are two letters of opposition to the expansion of Superstition Manor and to any reduction in the restrictions of Superstition
Manors SUP stipulations/conditions.
I have taken the liberty of eliminating the address, phone number and e-mail address as Mr. Gerard says they are not required and it
makes it a bit more difficult for the owner of Superstition Manor to contact them and intimidate them.
I have sent a copy of this e-mail to the letter writers under BCC to prevent their e-mail address from becoming public knowledge.
Please include the attached letters in your count of opposition.
Sincerely,
Donald Dahler
Group Leader
East Valley Property Rights Coalition
480 984-8061
SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
(X) I feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
(X) I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte
Road and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
(X) I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds
of guests.
(X) I am concerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
f,X) ! have other comments / concerns -as. follows:
What I find incredulous is that just when I think things can't worse and I don't have to re-commit time to
address an issue that I originally opposed, that being the original Special Use Permit for the Superstition
Manor, now the residents in the area are currently tasked with battling this expansion coupled with all that
goes along with raising a family, paying bills, etc. As I understand this process, it could well become a sort
of a "groundhog day" for those of us that opposed the original Special Use Permit and now the expanded
version of the same (we will have to re-visit this for years to come). This will no doubt be a recurring theme
in our lives and I find that bizarre, as when I purchased my home in the county island, I did not expect to
be defending peace and harmony, property values, and unforeseen traffic. I made some observations
before the original Special Use Permit was approved by the Supervisors and they were as follows: Mr.
Burns spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in betterments to his property before he obtained the Special
Use Permit, Why would a businessman expend that quantity of money gambling that the Supervisors would
approve the Special Use Permit as his venue benefits himself financially, not the community in which it is
situated. As I stated previously, I have no idea why one would spend hundreds of thousands of dollars
without first obtaining a Special Use Permit. It is the perception of some that the approval for the original
Special Use Permit was a foregone conclusion. There appears to be no other plausible explanation other
than this was bound to happen no matter what the objections were.
Now while we await the next decision regarding the planned expansion, I drive by the Superstition Manor
and see that construction to the west has begun. The parcel to the west has been regraded and there is a
block wall being constructed. Once again it seems that it would be a risky proposition to begin spending
thousands of dollars without first having the Special Use Permit amendation approved and in hand. It
appears to one commoner who purchased a home in a residential area with no businesses such as the
Superstition Manor, that there is something radically wrong with the sequence of events that led to the
ratification of this permit, as one would expect that a Special Use Permit first would be obtained and then
betterments made. I am frustrated and do not feel confident that this area will remain non-commercial as
history is repeating itself again. I invite each of you to come to my home and I will demonstrate why
residences that are beyond 300 feet of the named property are most definitely impacted in a negative way.
1 agree with the above statement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
0
signature k _ ..,)04 / Date 41412015
Printed Name _Isabel Hoskin
Parcel Number 220-04-010Z
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
(X) I feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
(X) I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte
Road and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
(X) I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds
of guests.
(X) I am concerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
(X) I have other comments / concerns as follows:
What I find incredulous is that just when I think things can't worse and I don't have to re-commit time - to
address an issue that I originally opposed, that being the original Special Use Permit for the Superstition
Manor, now the residents in the area are currently tasked with battling this expansion coupled with all that
goes along with raising a family, paying bills, etc. As I understand this process, it could well become a sort
of a "groundhog day" for those of us that opposed the original Special Use Permit and now the expanded
version of the same (we will have to re-visit this for years to come). This will no doubt be a recurring theme
in our lives and I find that bizarre, as when I purchased my home in the county island, I did not expect to
be defending peace and harmony, property values, and unforeseen traffic. I made some observations
before the original Special Use Permit was approved by the Supervisors and they were as follows: Mr.
Burns spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in betterments to his property before he obtained the Special
Use Permit. Why would a businessman expend that quantity of money gambling that the Supervisors would
approve the Special Use Permit as his venue benefits himself financially, not the community in which it is
situated. As I stated previously, I have no idea why one would spend hundreds of thousands of dollars
without first obtaining a Special Use Permit. It is the perception of some that the approval for the original
Special Use Permit was a foregone conclusion. There appears to be no other plausible explanation other
than this was bound to happen no matter what the objections were.
Now while we await the next decision regarding the planned expansion, I drive by the Superstition Manor
and see that construction to the west has begun. The parcel to the west has been regraded and there is a
block wall being constructed. Once again it seems that it would be a risky proposition to begin spending
thousands of dollars without first having the Special Use Permit emendation approved and in hand. It
appears to one commoner who purchased a home in a residential area with no businesses such as the
Superstition Manor, that there is something radically wrong with the sequence of events that led to the
ratification of this permit, as one would expect that a Special Use Permit first would be obtained and then
betterments made. I am frustrated and do not feel confident that this area will remain non-commercial as
history is repeating itself again. I invite each of you to come to my home and I will demonstrate why
residences that are beyond 300 feet of the named property are most definitely impacted in a negative way.
agree with the above statement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
Signature ,F017—PrieZ------- / Date 414/2016
Printed Name _Robert Hoskin
• Parcel Number 220-04-010Z
• Address 10616 E Hillview St
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Superstition Manor <john@superstitionrnanorcom>
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 4:17 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Page Gonzales - DIST2X;
Steve Chucri - DIST2X
Subject: Fwd: Petition page 1
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
All the neighbors to south have signed with no issues at all. I personally have went around and invited them to
the neighborhood meeting for April 6 2015 at 6 pm. I also have two neighbors directly across from Donald
dollar have signed and stated they can not hear a thing from the manor and one went as far as to say Donald
dollar is a het I don't want to defend myself by using neighbors to speak to his numerous emails but what else
am I to do. He dies not represent any neighbors that are within 300 ft nor does he repeat sent anyone that lives
in his own street. I have their signatures.
John A. Burns
Superstition Manor
480-560-4390
Begin forwarded message:
From: <payment@superstitionmanor.corn>
Date: April 1, 2015 at 2:55:54 PM MST
To: iohn@superstitionmanor corn
Subject: Petition page 1
IP(
Nuetral gill= PL fWATei--
.
t
Mill , 11E11111111.11 ,ceill g"..-Li W11111101111
Change No -r/-r
La: de
1„----- wt iv\
Support e (77,e
Yes 6 C 1111111111110101111111111 co
o I',4 H 7
:‹,
s 6z..,5 6.)
L O4L6rPt
v fLe) 1-4 q:',4479-763'
A i 0 7 1111111.111111111.11111.11=11111
Mail Aro 1)4 0
E
-.2.07 (0
cCE 2 -7'7
C*,4( -V5v .5
7 .9 - ,ORD --:5
e
documents - ztl _ !)-
0 , .
f''' d 0 __.._.
. 4iSolzo
and • ki VC. ''
Phone tg..1 .f
reguest , (I
miamtemarlimm ' si- 6
4. f
' '.,;1' 4A, ,)'',,
amendlment ,Lr r IV?
s be) . -,71 .
' 111=1/111=1 .44' , IIMENINIM ',& 1.-&'.-4
the -t4,..--.7,,,...z-i. i (
./r; n
reviewed ddreso Comment corrpe.n vrearb COITISWIt rorrient Ccorment • n.'711 Comment Comm
Center cur c /
Manor 1 1 1
flid
a
me . cio
to , P
Event meeting ).r?.e/K---
i L •,_ c
fi•liVered ..-- . 0/.
. ,. ,' .--,-------
and Citizen IMEMPIIIMIK Ari - ,- 111MANIME111.1
Air • tr
— L- '''''''''' ,
Superstition
Burns•personzlly atertt - ) ,Ik., (7
-•--.`..t.-.-,1_
1` , th.c):.
wedding Plan r tups)-(--e-, ,. 4'•
lmitatlo 2.Narroilve • • • __,---- 2,
Z7014012 Site 7)1 • )
Jcilnn • 1. ,
1. a,
Sign Print
7
DEVELOPED SUITS
VS2/7
BEING GROOMS
ZIP
MANOR WITH TATE kacqr r t
1JZJt4-4
BUILDING CITY, 144L41-
SUPERSTITION 7
MOUNTAINS SUPPORT ADDRESS, 6-itarn Stacwo,
OF
SUPERSTITION WEST ALSO 1A0
talinestmerstitioninanur.rom OF JUST FACILITY. [3
THE —lisa@superstountador,corn LOT
OF 85207
VtEWS Az norrom SUPPORT ACRE PARKING -
Mesa Rd Tod) Text).— 2.5 THE NUMBER 74)---/-124 -774-79)7 en
IMMACULATE Butte (400)279-3906 www.stmergitiennia or er IN ACRE co
Signal (Call (Call INCLUDE 2 A '5
4a• WITH N 720-7535 PETITION AND PHONE c.10 ErE
HALL 1220 (480)5604394 WILL YARD
(4N)
RECEPTION Burns Burns EXPANSION STORAGE
Lisa John
LAND THIS AND
WEDDING MANOR. BUILDING
SUPERSTITION OPERATIONS
OF
ACRE
EXPANSION Al
INTO
THE
7
1 1
O. aRA -16.—:'
5--
-Ar Ir cir,•--AL
DEVELOPED SUITS l el<'<7=7 •
V s-• ,r 4, , L.,,rdt-
MitalIMEIMM '. iC. ,-:- , ei9Z
BEING GROOMS i IA I 2.0 Ac-z- xa ritrAmir ,ranok.,4-3,
ZIP 111111111=1.11.... ' WIV 'N maramewhion. J- ,L 611-tg
tChi . - k, . -7
MANOR WITH STATE, e 09'.g 0
o 5F-C e'D j
, 61 Vt- / Filo,.
BUILDING CITY/ INEMETIFEWMMEZNIMIIMMINIE ra.e. -- fEAA:1 COI
SUPERSTITION h. St- - r-f-• l, Ap .
OrLe.,_ V k hi -. 0-.L 7)' a S ifg
MOUNTAINS SUPPORT ADDRESS, r'.,0 (i.P.4--co ‘'d e.. '
OF • 4,4,4 . tick --w-4-n-,,,,, 1-i, 0.- ---uS00-\.1 110WHINEMIEMMEMNEWINIMMETWPMEI
,jr - 1 - 564-u) - 1,-. i 4 1='etica--
SUFERSTMON enema r.rom WEST ALSO - c._ •-C. ,:-,- A- • .
am no JUST Mill=aft P • 9, -rc- , e"-- 2-7. ._. 5e,
titionma OF FACILITY. wiffm 4i-q2.-1 O. 1S • 1 .5- 0.1 .3- .Y.
THE pen LOT 4°111 1%or.) 2-W'C 1 cf 0 vzt g'-7
OF 35247 -lisnOsupersiitio , 1 d• -
Az 6?-esu ACRE Mitintirnall..1111111.1111
VIEWS o SUPPORT PARKING 1
Meta - 2.5 j /,577±1~ cnS o_scps- :if 'S4k.o 2-bl- IIMMENCREMEMINIMI
RE 0802794906 erventstmerslisionmanor.earo Text) Text) THE ACRE NUMBER e.. 2tg- 5rs , am • 0C-1.00 -7-C)OLCte
IMMACULATE Butte or or IN -Sgo-gs , not Ilittfflangiliat - ^r 1- 'X'-'
Signal (Call {Call INCLUDE 2 A -7,(0-- 72:0 -7+g ii -48 ' LP 711 LI215,1---4.5-1-qi.1-1 -2A.0
WITH N 720-7535 AND PHONE -- - 2 - a• - D
1220 5604390 PETITION WILL Lig-0 Ll'?70 676)- T: tra, so _, 1-1?D
HALL ) YARD r
(434) (480
RECEPTION Boras rna RA EXPANSION STORAGE
Lisa .1.011u mim
THIS AND
WEDDINGZAND ,.....,417-M111111I / .
MANOR. BUILDING sbyx ,
M 4 cwriCA A.
. 1,--r 45,0) 1
zLir IW 1
/JIM C_"")
SUPERSTITION OPERATIONS 1,0,71.RWRIAleregr EIBMWri- . InaNIUMEINIMMIIII 0
*MIN ,0
14 .ok t .c ri011.0/la
Wai•Mfg* fki • t. Effiff _
OF ACRE at V...f., -
Mamma I bilk
1
EXPANSION A
INTO i6 1101111 /K • MEOW
DATE I itS- MU MEM NUM 1 EN=
THE I 1 ) 1 JJ
7 Prar 1011
I
gi5746 5ZOS
:i 1 - . 2.i
Z lc Y alc- a. ,
DEVELOPED • 6, &
SUITS AIVIWZIIMPA t. 0 , MIUMIN
lulm
Vi Z-
BEING GROOMS -c--1
A Z AL4P ---
MANOR WITH t( u a /- -1-:aZ .,LE jvil=ai,
/P Z),-_ 13‘ _
BUILDING dIrA, it 1.1111.111.11111111.11.11111...111111.
SUPERSTITION r '
MOUNTAINS a nk . /((,. i',4 _.,i2ef tt6VIIM txJA
OF SUPPORT to cv, ' . 10.11.1.11..1111M.1111.101.11ININIMMINIMMIll 1.111.1.1.1111111111=1.1.1.111.11.11.1.11.1.11.
7m 4 6f/ 4.- k
paRsTrrioN WEST ALSO Cm 4/2 I • . P. li\i,
JUST i z s .a-, S, 3
SU superstilnrimanor.com OF FACILITY. / 0 Xo 1- lue - i5g.
THE --lisagsuperstitiomanor.com LOT - c-- 1(4b, l'7 7 a c -a MinanallEMITAMEI 1111
OF 85207 ACRE
VIEWS Az kdinfit SUPPORT 23 PARKING .- L-
Mtsa Text) — THE 1-1 . -tn-i —it1
IMMACULATE Rd (480)279-3906 www,surierstiliournanor.coni or Text) ACRE NUMBER , , - ) - sb-i9a-7 - e ETZTOMMIEll MIIMIIMINIIIIMIEIIIMIMIIEIIINIIEIIEMIIMINIIIIIIIIIIIEIIOMIIMINIIEIMIIIIIIMIMIMIIMIMIII 1.1111.11.11=MMEMIMINIIIIMMENIMINEMMENME1111.1.11.11.11.11.111.111.
Butte (Cali or IN INCLUDE 2 ,[st fr- 04r- ‘z7v
WITH Signal (Coll A PHONE 3 - - 6- 0- - — -
N 720-7535 500.4390 PETITION WILL AND -) v - C(66- VO 0 0
HALL 1220 YARD 6 q 4 q
(480} MO
RECEPTION Rurns Sums EXPANSION
Lisa Jutaa STORAGE 1111.11.11.1.11 10.1111111.1.11.11MMIIIIMMI111.11 .111.11.111.1.1.11.1.111.11011.111.1111111 OMIIMIIIIIMIIMIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIMIMIMMIMII
"FANO THIS iallEMMINI
AND =IMIMIMIMMIMMNMIII.IIIIIMIMMMII IIIIIMMMNIMIIIIMMIIIIIIMIMIMMMNIMMIMIM IMIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIMIEIIIMMIIIMIIIMII.11MMIIIMII MMMIIEIOMIIMIIIIIIMIIMIIIMIIMIIIIIIIMIOIIIIMIMII IIIIIMIIIIIMIIIIIIEIIIIMIIMIMIIIIIMIIIIIIINIIMIIIMIII
WEDDING MANOR. XL
BUILDING NAME NAME iWitall•IMINME WillifflieMOMMIIIMIN WIWOWNEMMIIIIIIIM i i
4
SUPERSTITION .1.1.111.1.11.111111.111.1.111.1
OPERATIONS
K
—
OF
AlACRE 111=211EMINIVE L:
EXPANSION rffiff01112/212 gallIPIMEM /2111=111111
INTO =MEr IMIllr .1111.11.1
DATE IMMM tf/MMI an=11 EIMMI 11.11111
THE
In A
"E0 3-7 s73 .gipirmm l 1?Th
DEVELOPED '' fl s151 (3 'N1
SUITS PS-r--- ,?.- ./a4Z0r-- "va
r IMICalti ar 2-1
1de Z r az V" IENII -^gsr/es'alcie
BEING GROOMS /I- ile A4 .1.12 7 f
ZIP • 4 z
F...A.-- . 1r6L1.'
MANOR WITH STATE, , 11-1-e5---,- ,
• -Ana AiLas, A% , 1-- ,..., .MBIIIEWIEOMM 5" "e3.4- 1"
BUILDING CITY, - A -Cat -2., c u.
SUPERSTITION . .4-vP LI A • wo y AL.,
MOUNTAINS ADDRESS, li-- , 4- 4 5 eTzi .., ItalMrt41 11,
OF SUPPORT , LA, /. ve_ wzmans-_cmiimmoommirimmen= Leo#ter e.c1/4(
,. 1 a:4 ,, C/ a 0,4 ,
WEST ALSO . 4k.:... i"- ,.;/ _ b- . 0 •Of Fort a Ai . .
SUPERSTITION Ft € P- PAOdl - i c„3 "‘ MISIMMIIM IMEIMENIV
LOTJUST FACILITY, C 6-:-. 7/.?/0.- MINIM C- - o VIIIMMMIPSAMILIUMBIffliMInf o ,s- Mrall" . '2,3:;,
THE -lisa@superstitionnummem lahnfcbrurgratitionmanonerim OF Za55 2_r155 -.II. 72-0{ 0- -15''' ? ,o'y GOI `-/
OF 85207 ACRE 7- 1
VIEWS Az SUPPORT 2.5 PARKING 5- -Z, 1)•aA0
Mesa - S ar 09 ,g Fc-) ,r
Rd (480)219-3900 www.saverstitinnrognnr.cout Text) Text} THE ACRE NUMBER -67_SL 5-,00 4-1‘7 tor -2 70.571 -01 -- S 3 I ..,-31
IMMACULATE Butte Dr or IN i, IIMMINalrellil SINSMINENNIII ck-, 0 -77 ,.., t.... ,,A-D.-
(Call (Call INCLUDE 2 A 1co 4LIS- I-)- _Si /t/ 100n--11no 0 -ZS -'5g:1-10 q
WITH N Signal 504390 AND PHONE SO4 c, r - -q - 0 GrOx6-03 5/Z-.3 0- C(C. Laa./C.p
1220 (400)720-7535 PETITION WILL 4-1u- ,e)z_ 9i- ir 1E122, 00
HALL (480) YARD A
11
RECEPTION Burns Burns EXPANSION STORAGE .
Liza .Tolut 0 IMIIIIIII
A,
THIS AND AIL-, Yv- A
WEDOINGZAND k -
MANOR. BUILDING ..t. ,,c. , 1 ,w.--mirrars- Co__ ovee/ Atur._ eAk\i‘137b-r\
NAME tN- iti v et-e--- .01,
• a 4 A I a NUMMIMINKIIIMMMUMENEIRLd a la
SUPERSTITION OPERATIONS 'el .T.t.,... . ,,,,vc‘ Ar * Al
' A a-- 1W-alluarit vre_'e
' Ik'k . 5t40,,,2,,
OF ACRE A--",-/- NMISIMMEIMMII r NW 51-,;ev,) ..........., klks. 1
1 MMIIPARMOIr r.
EXPANSION A r- 15- MffiiTirdre." 1S
INTO 2615 zo magunta mmewar L'IMMIEri -/is MUM
DATE .212/ NIN 1.--- i 0S161i
THE i 3-1- .- - MY 3 ,41 5
S-S"--
S
Z.-
DEVELOPED SUITS A
BEING GROOMS ItteScyl
ZIP
MANOR WITH STATE,
LJ‹,---
BUILDING CITY,
SUPERSTITION Vis-(-45.S13
MOUNTAINS SUPPORT ADDRESS,
OF gifir--4.(2.
WEST ALSO
SUPERSTITION 0
JUST FACILITY. 2-
THE —11xu@supersti1ionniannr.com —101nastinerstitionin000r.com OF LOT 0
OF 85207 ACRE •1
VIEWS Az SUPPORT PARKING (,,c1
Mesa 2.5
IMMACULATE Rd (4811)27R-3406 www,superatitionotannr.om Text) Text) THE ACRE NUMBER 3--51
Butte or or IN 2
Signal iCall Cali INCLUDE A AND PHONE -
WIT1-1 N 1220 720-7535 560-4390 PETITION WILL UNgi
HALL (480 (480) YARD
RECEPTION Burns Burns EXPANSION STORAGE
Lisa .Ioboi
THIS AND
WEDDING/AND
MANOR. BUILDING
NAME
SUPERSTITION OPERATIONS
OF ACRE
EXPANSION 1 A
INTO
.DATE
THE
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Donald Dahler <dp.dahler@q.com >
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:45 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDFVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark - PLAN DEVX;
john@superstitionmanorcom
Cc: Steve Chucri - DIST2X; Page Gonzales - DIST2X; Mike Cook; Jennifer; "Judith Schmier";
Ronald & Barbara Krainz; annfar@gmaiLcom; Andrew Kunasek - DIST3X; Clinton
Hickman - DIST4X; Cristina Arzaga-Williams - DIST5X; Denny Barney - DIST1X; Kevin
Tyne - DIST3X; District 5; Candice Copple DIST1X; Scott Isham - DIST4X
Subject: TAC-SUP Case Number 72014012 Expansion of Superstition Manor
Attachments: 72013113ApprovdMinorAmend 4pages11-21-13,pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The East Valley Property Rights coalition, a member of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), is opposed to the applicant's request
for expansion of Superstition Manor and changes to the SUP Case Number Z2014012.
We reviewed the original application documents for the proposed expansion of Superstition Manor's SUP Case number Z2014012. Our
review found many discrepancies and paragraphs that are confusing and we believe the complete narrative report and site plans need
to be rewritten and clarified to insure all misleading statements are eliminated and that all references and data need to agree on all
documents. Also, all of the requested changes and additions to the SUP need to be segregated and clearly identified in a section that
only delineates the specific changes and additions being requested. A list of the discrepancies we found was forwarded to the
applicant on 3-17-2015 at 5:54 PM by Darren Gerard with a reply from the applicant at 6:46 PM.
We received a revised narrative report on 3-23-2015 at 12:35 PM which contained many of the same discrepancies and errors that
were reported on our original document. Obviously the applicant ignored most of the discrepancies noted on the earlier report.
The applicant's operations have been very disruptive to our quite enjoyment rights of our properties. The applicant has rarely abided by
SUP noise limitations, off-site parking, more than one event at the same time, occupancy exceeding 250 and other SUP
stiputations/conditions, Furthermore the,applicant has disregarded County Rules, Regulations and Ordinances so the county should
only consider an SUP revocation hearing.
The applicant was originally provided a limited time period for the Special Use Permit and he knew the risk of termination before
pursuing expansion after expansion. The expansion has reduced the parking spaces from 122 spaces to the current 105 spaces
leaving insufficient (per the applicant) parking caused by the owner's aggressive expansion. Per the attached document item #4 the
applicant states reducing parking to 99 spaces will allow for 297 attendees and "with my SUP limited to 250 attendees our parking
exceeds the amount needed or required". The expansion was not appreciated by the neighbors and any expansion of parking is
opposed.
The residents did not know, when the county approved prior expansions, that it would not enforce the stipulations/conditions it allegedly
required to protect the residential character of the community especially in the evenings and on weekends. The neighbors will not
stand for the owner's disregard for County Rules, Regulations, Ordinances and SUP stipulations/conditions and rules previously
imposed on the owner and the county's failure to act.
Due to the applicant's prior violations a violation hearing was conducted in December of 2014 and the applicant was found responsible
and fined.
The residents hereby file a written protest to oppose the requested SUP expansion and revisions Case # Z2014012 under ARS 11-814
(D) and Section 304.2 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. The neighbors further request termination of the use requirements of
the original SUP approval case Z2012086.
Sincerely,
Donald Dahler
Group Leader
East Valley Property Rights Coalition
1
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Donald Dahler <dp.dahler@q.com >
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:04 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark - . PLANDEVX
Cc: Steve Chucri - DIST2X; annfar@gmail.com; Page Gonzales - DIST2X; Mike Cook; Jennifer;
"Judith Schmier''; Ronald & Barbara Krainz
Subject: Opposition to Superstition Manor expansion Case # Z2014012
Attachments: Z2013113ApprovdMinorAmend 4pages11-21-13.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Mr. Hanker and Mr. Gerard,
We, Donald and Pok Dahler owners of Parcel # 220-07-003B, do here by oppose any expansion of the Superstition Manor Site Plan,
Buildings or revisions to the stipulations/conditions as requested in Case # Z2014012. We will only consider stricter restrictions and
requirements in the SUP stipulations/conditions or termination of the use requirements of the original SUP approval Case #2012086.
In the past year the applicant has, on numerous occasions chosen to violate the Stipulations/conditions of his SUP and disregard
Maricopa County Rules, Regulations and ordinances. In December of 2014 the applicant attended a violation hearing for prior
violations and was found responsible and fined. The zoning code enforcement officer observed at least four (4) violations of the SUP
stipulations/conditions. The applicant having been found responsible for prior violations, we believe the only consideration of a
hearing to be given at this time would be for a revocation of the applicant's current SUP.
If a hearing is held for the continuance and expansion of the current SUP then, we request that the current SUP stipulations/conditions
be made stricter and not less restrictive as follows:
1. A new stipulation/condition requiring: The owner of the SUP shall reside in the dwelling unit in which the business
operates. Should the owner no longer reside in the dwelling unit in which the business operates the SUP will become null, void
and be revoked.
2. A new stipulation/condition requiring: The Special Use Permit is issued to one person, shall not be transferable to any other
person; is not attached to the land; and is not transferable from one place of residence to another. The issuance of any permit
is not in perpetuity or renewable to any other business owner in the event of a sale. Should the owner sell the facility the SUP
will become null, void and be revoked.
3. All parking areas shall be paved per Chapter 11 Article 1102.7.1 and all parking spaces shall be designated by striping per
Chapter 11 Article 1102.7.9.
The above restrictions apply to a Cottage Business and certainly the applicant shall not have requirements that are less restrictive than
the owner of a Cottage Business.
A fourth (4), fifth (5) and sixth (6) restriction needs to be added to the Stipulations/Conditions on occupancy as follows:
4. For determining the occupancy at an event the number of vehicles times three (3) will give a conservative number of people on
the property which shall not exceed 250 people at one time. See the attached document item 4 as determined by the applicant
in 2013. The applicant's justification for reducing the parking in 2013 shall apply to all future calculations to determine people on
the property at one time. Per the applicants own calculations the current parking spaces exceed the SUP occupancy
stipulation/condition of 250 any time the parking lot has 84 parking spaces filled.
5. Amplified music outdoors shall only be permitted during a wedding ceremony and for a period not to exceed one half hour. No
other amplified music is permitted outside.
6. If parking changes are approved: Add a stipulation/condition: No parking shall be permitted at any time on the north side of the
north driveway. The first documented violation documented by residents shall result in a fine of $1,000.00 or $500.00 per
vehicle whichever is greater; A second documented violation by residents shall result in a fine of $5,000.00 or $1,000.00 per
vehicle whichever is greater; A third documented violation by residents shall result in a fine of $10,000.00 or $2,000.00 per
vehicle whichever is greater and revocation of the SUP, the revocation of the SUP shall apply wherithe three (3) violations all
occur within a three (3) year time frame and the time frame shall start with the first-violation. The time frame will restart only
after three (3) years have passed without a violation. Documentation by residents must include date stamped pictures and is
valid regardless of whether or not Planning or zoning observes the violation.
We Donald and Pok Dahler Parcel Number 220-07-003B reiterate our opposition to any expansion of the SUP Case # Z2014012 and
any easing of the SUP stipulations/conditions or expansion of buildings or parking under ARS 11-814 (D) and Section 304.2 of the
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. We further request termination of the use requirements of the original SUP Approval Case
#Z2012086.
Sincerely,
1
Donald Dahler
Pok Dahler
2
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Jennifer <jen079@hotmai1.com >
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 1:25 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Cc: Steve Chucri - DIST2X; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject: Case #Z2014012
To whom it may concern,
We are submitting written opposition to the current Superstition Manor SUP expansion Case #Z2014012. We
purchased our property in 2011 prior to Mr. Burns purchasing the referenced property. Before the property
was obtained by Mr. Burns, we enjoyed a rural, non-congested comninnity with peaceful nights, perfect for
viewing stars. All these factors which drew us to the unique area. There were serene nights were we could have
our windows open to feel the cool evening breeze. We could spend time BBQing and doing outdoor activities,
enjoying the tranquil calmness of the unique area. But that all changed dramatically when the SUP was issued
to Mr. Burns. We now deal with extra traffic noise, the sound of car doors slamming, car alarms/locking
mechanisms going off, dust kicked up by the hundred-plus cars coming in and out of the property. We hear
amplified music playing outside, and the echoing of indoor music over powering our activities inside our home.
We now experience noise from large groups of people loitering outside the buildings and smoking at the back
fence of our property. We previously never encountered any traffic jams on Signal Butte when accessing our
neighborhood, but it's now a reality as hundreds of cars pile into the facility. We have witnessed dozens of cars
park on Signal Butte Road right of way, causing dangerous blind spots for pulling out of our neighborhood. The
traffic onto Signal Butte road has doubled since the facility began business. We deal with numerous parking lot
lights illuminating our dark nights and lighting up our rear windows of our home, some nights not turning off
until past midnight. We were lead to believe a quiet, small-cottage business would be run out of the acquired
residence, but non of which has happened. Mr. Burns no longer personally resides at the residence either. We
have watched as the building has doubled in size and multiple events are taking place simultaneously,
exceeding the outlines number of guests allowed on the property at one time. Many nights there are more cars
than the parking lot allows room for, the parking attendants direct cars to park on adjacent vacant parcels or
double park in the parking lot behind other cars, violating Fire Safety codes. Some events have shuttles that
bring in guests since the parking lot is filled beyond capacity. These are just a fraction of the disruptions this
operation has been to our quiet, enjoyment rights of our property. In fact they have become so disruptive, that
we have chosen to list our property for sale and move.
Mr. Burns has never abided by noise limitations and stipulations as well as constructing structures and fences in
violating areas or without permits. Recently, a Hearing Officer ruled and his judgments are proof of continued
violations and total disregard for the County's rules, and his neighbors. The County should only consider a
revocation hearing. Mr. Burns was originally provided only a limited time period for the special use permit and
he knew the risk of termination before pursuing expansion after expansion. The neighbors did not know when
the county approved prior expansions, that it would not enforce the stipulations it allegedly required to protect
the residential character of the unique community. The neighbors will not stand for Mr. Burns total disregard
for the rules previously imposed on himself, and the County's failure to act.
We, the undersigned property owners, hereby file a written protest to oppose the case #Z2014012 under AIRS
11-814(D) and Section 304.2 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. We further request termination of the
use of the requirements of the original approval case Z2012086.
Respectfully,
1
Blake and Jennifer Clarkson
220-04-014P
2
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Ann <annfar@gmail.com >
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 7:03 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX;
Steve Chucri - DIST2X; Page Gonzales - DIST2X
Cc: Donald Dahler
Subject: RE: Opposition to the Superstition Manor Wedding and Event Center SUP Expansion
Case #72014012
To: Maricopa Planning & Development: Raymond Banker, Darren Gerard, Debra Stark
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, District #2: Steve Chucri, Page Gonzales
East Valley Property Rights Coalition — Donald Dahler and Residents
Please count this email as our statement of Opposition to this requested Amendment
RE: Opposition to the Superstition Manor Wedding and Event Center SUP Expansion Case
#Z2014012
Parcel 220-04-014Y (Formerly known as Parcel 220-04-014W and 220-04-0145)
Northwest corner of Brown Rd & Signal Butte Rd.
Opposition to the Request to expand onto adjacent parcels to the west (Parcels 220-04-013K
and/or 220-04-013G).
Dear Planning Staff and Supervisor Chucri,
This is a request to Deny the Amendment for Case #Z2014012, Superstition Manor Wedding
and Event Center, and to Deny Any Expansion and SUP Changes for this facility including site
plans, additional structures and parking. We are opposed to any Amendment to the Special
Use Permit for the Superstition Manor Wedding and Event Center.
We are strongly opposed to any and all expansion of the Superstition Manor Wedding and
Event Center, any and all changes to the stipulations in the Special Use Permit for this facility
including extending the expiration date of their SUP and increasing the number of persons
that can be on the property during each and any event.
We are adamantly opposed to a parking lot expansion. In our opinion, this constitutes expansion
of the facility as it will allow for more persons to attend each event Awarding the owners of this
facility an additional parking lot for their guests will in effect give them carte blanche to increase the
number of their guests at night and on weekends when Planning cannot observe their violations in
doing so. Allowing guest parking on the adjacent west acreage will in no way benefit the neighbors to
the north of this facility as the end result will be more traffic and more vehicle noise.
We are opposed to the addition of more buildings, changes in site plans and the lessening of
restrictions. These are commercial building additions in what was supposed to be a residential
"cottage industry" where the owners resided in the residence. The addition of all these buildings for
more people, more weddings and more parties is way beyond the scope of the original SUP and
should not be allowed.
1
We are opposed to changing any of the Special Use Permit (SUP) stipulations that were put in
place to make the Superstition Manor Venue more compatible with our neighborhood. Changing
these stipulations will only exacerbate the problems that this venue has imposed upon our
community.
It appears that stipulations presently outlined in the Special Use Permit (SUP) for the Superstition
Manor are not being enforced at night and on weekends because Maricopa County Planning "Code
enforcement employees are not on-call at night or over the weekends" when the violations are most
likely to occur. Most violations have been observed on weekends and evenings, but because the
Planning staff is unavailable to observe and document weekend and evening violations, they are
unable to issue citations. Thus we have seen little or no enforcement of the SUP stipulations on
weekends or evenings.
We further oppose the existence of this Venue in our neighborhood for the following reasons:
1. Arizona Real Estate Residential Seller's Property Disclosure Statement (SPDS) requires us to
disclose the existence of this Venue as a neighborhood noise nuisance as a requirement to sell our
house. The existence of this business venue in our neighborhood scares off potential Buyers,
resulting in lower property values and in us having to lower the price of our home in order to sell it. In
summation, the disclosure of this Venue will result in an unfair monetaty detriment to the homes
impacted by the Superstition Manor Venue.
2. This Venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
3. The risk of impaired drivers departing this Venue on Signal Butte Road and Brown Road is too
great a risk for this rural community.
4. The amount of noise and loud amplified music generated by this facility is offensive to residents
living here in what was once a quiet rural residential neighborhood.
Discussion:
Personal Hardship We can no longer enjoy our property.
Our family built our home in 2010 in the Scarface neighborhood before the existence of the
Superstition Manor Wedding and Event Center which we are directly north of. We are close enough
to this Venue to be continually disturbed by noise and amplified music at each event being held there.
Since Superstition Manor opened for business, our family has observed and endured excessive loud
noise, whoops and hollers, amplified music that was not a wedding march, separate events held
concurrently, more than 160 vehicles at an event (with 2 persons per vehicle that would exceed the
250 person limit), off-site parking on 107 th Street, event guests' vehicles parked along side our
property's fence, hotel shuttles and SUVs dropping off guests, plus a variety of permit violations,
some we learned were cause for a violation hearing. We have experienced traffic congestion while
trying to leave or return to our home. We can no longer enjoy a quiet evening on our patio due to the
existence of this Venue. Additionally, the number of parties that aren't weddings appears to have
increased, thus compromising the integrity of our community.
With the loud music, late hours and alcohol being served, it's like living next door to a
nightclub.
Non-Compliance with SUP Stipulations
2
Our observations and experience over the past two years has proven to us that Superstition Manor,
for the most part, has been unable or unwilling to comply with the stipulations of their SUP,
particularly on weekends and evenings. This alone confirms our opinion that granting them a parking
lot expansion will in effect allow them to increase their guest list by hundreds, most likely at night and
on weekends when Planning is unable to observe the violation.
Residents Property Rights are Being Violated and They are Moving Out of the Area -
Sadly, we have already seen our neighbors moving out of this area to get away from the Superstition
Manor. The Superstition i\Aanor Wedding and Event Center is a business and belongs in a business
district not in our residential neighborhood. Residents have property rights and ours are being
violated in the worst possible way.
Deny the Amendment
The Venue is not in any way compatible with the residential character of our county
neighborhoods. It is a public nuisance, and for this and the above compelling reasons, the
Amendment to the SUP should be denied.
In fact, the right thing to do is to revoke the SUP and move the Venue to a more appropriate business
location.
Regards,
Rosanne Norstrom-Farence (aka "Ann Farence") and John Farence
Parcel 220-04-013C - 10710 E Gary Ln, Mesa, AZ 85207
3
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Karren <aplushorses@q.com >
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 4:06 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Cc: Steve Chucri BOS2; Donald Dahler; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX; gonzales001
@rnaiLmaricopa.gov
Subject: Fwd: Reopening of Z2014012 SUP Modifications to originally granted SUP for
Superstition Manor
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Dear Sir,
I am resending this message to include my husband's name and our phone # as well as parcel #. I've
been advised that you will not entertain this message of concern without these items.
Thank you,
Karen Ayotte
Forwarded Message is from: Larry & Karren Ayotte
10831 E. Edgegrove St
Mesa, AZ 85207
(480) 354-9605...this is a land line, please leave a message if needed
Parcel # 220-07-026F
From: "Karren" <aplushorses@q.com>
To: "Raymond Banker PLANDEVX" <raymondbanker@ma il.maricop a. gov>
Cc: "Donald Dahler" <dp.dahler i,C1.001:11>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 1:40:36 AM
Subject: Reopening of Z2014012 SUP Modifications to originally granted SUP for Superstition Manor
Dear Mr. Banker,
First and most importantly, I am communicating with your office to declare OPPOSITION to
all requested modifications/amendments to the SUP originally granted to Mr. John Burns for the development
of Superstition Manor
Having read the proposed request from Mr. Bums, I will again state that there is great anxiety
in our neighborhood concerning the granting of an obviously "Commercial" enterprise within an area
zoned for Low Density RESIDENTIAL use. One of our highest concerns revolves around the request
to "EXPAND" the use of Superstition Manor (here after SM) from Weddings/Family Reunions/Banquets
to "Political Events (and the like) which are designed to host 250+ patrons at one time. These kinds of
"Events" are not within the Home Cottage Enterprise description which usually operates under SUP provision
within RESIDENTIAL neighborhoods. We do not want the 2016 Republican State Convention, Vintage
Auto Auctions, or the Cigar Makers of America Charity Poker Game in our back yards, or across the
street. We do not want the alcohol, the traffic, or possibly escort services that come with these kinds of events.
We did not want Superstition Manor as an Event Center at all. We were glad to allow a Bed & Breakfast,
an Assisted Care Facility, maybe even a home Bakery (the kitchen was already there), but what Planning
& Zoning has allowed (and given only a slap on the hand for all violations) is clearly an openly Commercial
venture.
Having read through the "Description of Proposal" portion of SM's request for amendment to existing
SUP, I am confused by item #2. It states that SM "has acquired all necessary permits through County
& State for kitchen and alcohol services". Does this mean that SM has been granted a Liquor License?
What does a residential Home Business need with a Liquor Permit? How does this allocation by County and
State demonstrate in good faith the upholding of understood Zoning Regulations currently in effect for the
RESIDENTIAL neighborhood?
In the "Relationship to Surrounding Properties" section of Mr. Burn's submitted proposal, I believe
there is gross misrepresentation on his part that other "similar" venues exist near by. The Arizona Model
Aviators
and P&M Trailriders both exist through long term lease agreements on what is essentially County Parks Land.
They house "non-profit" amenities for neighborhood hobby usage. They are existing to serve the community
just a any Park would. They defray County maintenance costs by operating Club governing bodies that
perform li upkeep duties through Volunteers. They are Not permitted Alcohol, and Noise/Light usage is
strictly limited to No later than 10 PM. Comparing SM to these venues is erroneous!
Sir, these are just some of the discouragements that have occurred within the long term battle between
our Rural Neighborhood and the encroaching SM. Please consider disallowing Mr. Burns request for
expansion. In its current state, SM can adequately accommodate its Wedding Events as it has for over
200 weddings thus far (as stated by Mr. Burns). Please do Not extend the SUP for up to 15 years. If
Mr. Burns needs to enhance his Kitchen and Linen Service, I'm sure he can do it without the "Commercial
Loan" he is seeking to obtain, since he has verbalized to our concerned group that he has very deep pockets, and
he will do as he pleases.
Thank you for your time,
Karren Ayotte
10831 E. Edgegrove St.
Mesa, AZ 85207
(you already have my parcel # on file from previous communications)
Karren/Mom/Mimi
2
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Joan Olcott <azcowponies@msn.com >
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 11:39 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject: Superstition ManorCase#Z2014012
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
February 16, 2015
Dear Planning and Zoning,
In regards to the Superstition Manor Reception Center.
We were told this site would not change in size and regulation of noise levels. We are proponents of property rights and
free enterprise.
I can tell you all that the noise coming from the facility last night 2/15/2015 at 930 PM was so loud we could not have
the doors or windows to our house open and we live 1/4 mile from the Manor.
So where does that place the residents in the big picture? So what do you all on the planning and zoning plan to help
us?
There needs to be a noise level established for the area and time of ending festivities!
We would like to say we would not like to see this facility get bigger than it is and the rules need to be maintained.
Thank You,
John & Joan Olcott
10718 E. Fenimore Road
Mesa, AZ 85207
480-296-8429
Parcel #220-13-0268 8
RECEiVED
MAY
2 Print Sign
6
3. 2. John
2015' 1" NI 3-• 1/ /44.2- 'IL 11 . -.1t.uo'cl- Name Site Narrative 22014012
,( • Plan Burns Wedding
\ 4, / 1 ..-
F el P..li 0 10:11611.- -."D personally S'uyerstition
cNifx", t 1..InvitationlatterIO_CitlZerLineeting
M I and
" e5vEZ- 'eat
A.I. delivered
r. to Event
C me 311
, ' and
• an
Parcel Parcel . I Parcel Parcel Parcel 116) Parcel ICIOVI Parcel 2072 Parcel ° A Parcel CT-A6 Address reviewed Center
# # r It 10_19-,_4, # # 4 # # # or
/; r Ar? ) A-- bi 6- • the
i 4,... 9., 070 6 E.W..-41.p.
&y 'LV°C
Li i.,,,.,0, 9 lie amendment
e „ ,.......--, dye- _Sie...,4•4-ez‘..- L. re
14011y 4 6 guest
,,t,„, k
'Loom 64 14, I ,/.0 le-V, i.i.- 6.16,..&, and
Ot- /
Avo-j
i i5\ documents
\ A. I ,vv V .57, o Az.
2,-1.
71i1.0 f1104, Aa 25z1.5-
. , .
c-INA-IliD.-/
a
Comment Comment comment 0 Comment 2712-ZiComment50S Comment Comment Comment ,iso- Comment qao Phone
P 3;05'23 Hoe-3e- ,L6ci
w 7,-(15,.=\' 7„--i3)/3 •Gco.erYrr
r. 5-‘414* -V1 v-c,
"77_,
7
ZPPI_ I E
0 -?-2., Mail
d".t,M
,
• ,
A to
ecoi.c46-1-,,,..*
eb r i
.
P I 1„. . . I
M Yes
V Support
111
C
No
ge
Nuetral
taw
Print Sign
ri Name 3. 2. John
Site 22014012
fr ct4s-rit Plan Narrative Burns Wedding
-0--"--------
personally Suyerstition
eo and
t totitiZeivmeekkg delivered
ec.I-C1 to Event
. me
and [Manor
Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel _0- Address reviewed Center
# if if if if if if # if 2-/
c the
.2,71_,)
amendment
"'"(1
q V
— reguest
cr,
r and
c-R
documents
Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Phone
140
..-co..s ,
v‘L (4,5
I E
(53 Mail
a
e-5
C
(ICI
P
&‘-\1'
, 1 I L 6 K.-) Yes
Support
1 0 (
No Change
if
I I 0
V1Q) Nuetral
Print Sign
Name 3. 2. 1. John
b 111 IIIIIII Site 7.2014012
I W% t, ,.,,..A. Plan Narrative Invitation Burns Wedding
n 8 <V r',1IIIRD:lit IINHAF i.INIffent ,-z_l letter Superstition
g.....1) personally
a 11111.111.1.11.11 NIMMOMMEM iiriffINAFIMNI 1lEIIMIMIMMIE 5 to and
1.eX 1111110111I11121 0_ Citizen
""iNWILMEmMIMINIM A i 6 v delivered
MgWA fkrmabca- meeting to Event
alMill me
and _Manor
iM /.i Address Center
2111111 J06 IMIN M t, ( 5 reviewecht6e
„ Inigiali IMEIIIIIII MIIIMIIIIPMIIMIIBEIIMIIMIIMMIILIIIIIIII t /J 111.1.11.11=11111411111101.1.1.1.11.111 .
1
INWIVMPrii q
(). to& 0 7 1 — amendment
' .,'I
.. i(-& -
t 4- oi reguest
ek c-
-.. f so - and
kink ,,,
- . .1 0-z_ . documents
6InttlYI
. liCt 5LC2(15 r5a0 11te.50.4Maz
. 0 .,c7-7 7
11M 151 „, -fi !
Comment r_ 10111111 t• ,/ Comment Zt 9 Comment Phone
EEM 3 EEM EM 50- 2613_10
1111•1111MI 4 1 .1 ;re • 3SE t 4J-5 commec_rx7L-A *to-aro-ea/4
YO - - -q3
Tt 1-.
2.5 EIM CcqetraS t W
.SR " E
6- SSRce-vvI ir 2biii4 out , Mail
S (
)1 Cs‘l ue A
IIIIIIIERMINIIIIIIMINIMIIMMININIIIII -alv' a ta
c - 4r
L.MMINIM iMMEEMNFAi °`°'N'r - C (13476A
.
b OtoA.
IMMIIIMIIMINIIIIM 7
f - L Yes
ram ini #iqc -VIC& M1.1.1111111111111111 0„;).,,,,MIIIIIIIII Support
MEM No Change
40
keku. Iffill.111MI
iiii INII ME Nuetral
1
Print Sign
•
C ( Name
PP-re7t Z2014012
PNi .0Aw Ifte,7/ Wedding
gm d Neighborhood .5uyerstition
. MALE eh 6
a- et and
pw49,,,i--,re
L6:—`4___ .k r1/2.,:.1.3iW Event
.,../ lieveleJ*,,
Meeting :Manor
Pa /C, Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Pa rcel Parcel C° Parcel Address Center
rceL # „IVY # ,/d_..?V'S," # It # It 1344 # 1 # a/0 # :C-' #
1 I 7C—
,....<- • -67 AL - ---- Sign
107 iti , /o e. In
...--:..37-- /7,(
77'- lb
,'..... A. -7 :
1- 74-
iQZ ////<-
rieST
wt,
Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Phone
E
Mnil
Yes
X Support
k No Charge
Nuetral
Print Sign
__4 Nome Z2014012
'Wedding
IIMMF: d Neighborhood Suyerstition
M111.111.1.1111 MIMMIMIEM .11.1.1.1.11.1111 1=1.1.11.1111112 111=1=1111=1 IMISEFIEMEN and
, tralliMWAINIO
arJ Event
MI
Meeting :Manor
Parcel # Parcel # Effil 07s7 Parcel # 07 / 06 IMILIIFIMMJNIEMINNIMIriPit Address Center
.111.1111.111.11MMIMIMMIMIll 5- 7 g II=IIIIMITAIIIHNIIIIMIK1111111111MIcom.t Sign
MINEIMIIIIIMIMIMMIEMEMEMMENIMII e C_ / M In
e (' 1 .
MIMIII=MMIMIll MINMEINIIIIMMINIMEI , / ufN , 1'
6)
111MIIIMIMIIMIMMIIIMIN i , 5T
NIMIIIMMIIMEMIMEIMMINIMINIEMMIIMIMMIIIMEIMMIN 111111111111•111111EMIIIIIIMINIPMMINIMIIIIMAIIIMINIMINIMIN
Comment Comment Comment 112 nteg' Phone
1 OMNI= UMW
- . JPIMELDAIMIIMMEM•111MIIMIMEMI.
46
Mail E
MIIIMIIIIIMMIIMIIIIM
REMSWIMINIMIIIIMMIMM EMIIIMIMMI ejMIEWAIIMIMINIMIIMIIIII
5bc-c:5oorill=1111.1111.11M..
MIMIIIMIII11=11
NM Yes Support
=MI No Change
11.1 110.1=1.11
MM.
=I . ME IM Nuetrul
I 1
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Donald Dahler <dp.dahler@q.com >
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 5:51 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX
Cc: Steve Chucri - DIST2X; Page Gonzales - DIST2X; Mike Cook; annfar@gmail.com ; Jennifer;
"Judith Schmier"; Ronald & Barbara Krainz
Subject: Superstition Manor Case Z2014012 opposition petitions
Attachments: J Schmier1 1.pdf; J Schmier2 2.pdf; S Schmier1 1.pdf; S Schmier2 2.pdf
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Attached are four (4) more documents of opposition signed by the individuals opposed to Superstition Manor's request for expansion
case Z2014012.
These individuals may have sent in separate e-mails.
Please add the attached documents to the superstition Manor opposition file.
Sincerely,
Donald Dahler
Group Leader
East Valley Property Rights Coalition
As a
resident SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
of the FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
East PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
• I feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
• I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte Road
and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
• I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds of
guests.
O I
am concerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
O I have other comments / concerns as follows:
I agree with the above Satement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
• Signature / Date
• Printed Name' 72, f-/
• Parcel Number ot-?/9-
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
As 8
resident SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
of the FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
East PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
• As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte Road
and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
Et I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds of
guests.
Ct I am concerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
0 I have other comments / concerns as follows:
I agree with the above,,atenrgs) indicated by my checkmark.
• Signature / Date
• Printed Name/ _rieW,/ 727/ _/-/`
• Parcel Number - ,1,//z9
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
AS a
resident SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
of the FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
East PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
• I feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community,
• feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte Road
and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds of
guests.
O I am concerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
• I have other comments / concerns as follows: X' / -7/e f
- •
I agree with the above statement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
• Signature / Date
• Printed Name
a Parcel Number ,;? 4_?/ 72 - 7 //A
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
Asa
resident SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
of the FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
East PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
I feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
0,1) I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte Road
and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds of
guests,
am concerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
0 I have other comments I concerns as follows:
1 agree with the above statement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
• Signature / Date
(
• Printed Name
• Parcel Number
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
Planning & Development
Department
DATE: June 11, 2015
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Ray Banker, Planner
SUBJECT: Z2014012 - Superstition Manor - Agenda item 1
Staff would also like to make the following changes to the recommended conditions of approval for
Z2014012:
1. Staff would like to remove the last sentence of recommended condition 'h which states: "No business
operations (cleaning, set up, etc.) shall be conducted outside of these business hours." Staff was trying to
limit noise and distractions outside of operation hours open to the public. However we understand that
weddings and other functions require preparation and clean up duties as well as other functions outside of
hours. The noise levels would still be required to follow the guidelines in that respective condition.
Condition 1 h' as provided in staff report with edits:
h. The hours of operation (open to the public) for this facility shall be restricted to between 10:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. No business
operations (cleaning, set up, etc.) shall be conducted outsido of those business hours.
Recommended condition 'h' with changes:
h. The hours of operation (open to the public) for this facility shall be restricted to between 10:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday.
2. Staff also would also like to remove a portion of recommended condition 'lc' which states: "maximum
duration one hour during daylight hours only" which is referring to amplified music. Staff realizes that
different religions and groups have various lengths for their ceremonies and did not want to discriminate
against anyone.
Condition 'lc' as provided in staff report with edits:
k. No amplified music or speakers are permitted outside other than during a ceremony officiated by an
individual authorized to perform weddings -(maximum duration one hour during daylight hours only).
Amplified music inside shall not extend past 9:00 p.m. Sunday - Thursday and 10:00 p.m. on Friday and
Saturday. Noise generated on site shall not exceed 55 dB average over a 10 minute period as measured
outside the boundary of the special use permit.
Recommended condition 'ki with changes:
k. No amplified music or speakers are permitted outside other than during a ceremony officiated by an
individual authorized to perform weddings. Amplified music inside shall not extend past 9:00 p.m. Sunday -
Thursday and 10:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. Noise generated on site shall not exceed 55 dB average
over a 10 minute period as measured outside the boundary of the special use permit.
3. Staff would like to re-configure the first sentence of recommended condition 'm' which reads: "The
designated orsite parking area must be paved with marked spaces." The applicant requested that
recycled asphalt be used and staff is in agreement as long as the spaces can be marked and it can meet
Air Quality standards. If it cannot meet these requirements, then the parking will have to be paved as
required for commercial development.
502 N. 44th Street, Suite 200 • Phoenix, AZ 85008 • (602) 372-0318 • (602) 506-3711 fax
-Internet: www.maricopa.gov/planning
Condition 'm' as provided in stuff report with edits:
m. The designated onsite parking area must be paved or use of recycled asphalt material that meets Air
Quality standards with marked spaces. All guests, customers, customers, staff, residents, visitors and any
other persons shall park in the designated parking area and not on the adjacent streets, proximate
neighborhood streets, or offsite residential parcels; except that offsite event parking at nonresidential
properties is permitted with a valet or shuttle service.
Recommended condition 'mr with changes:
m. The designated onsite parking area must be paved or use of recycled asphalt material that meets Air
Quality standards with marked spaces. All guests, customers, customers, staff, residents, visitors and any
other persons shall park in the designated parking area and not on the adjacent streets, proximate
neighborhood streets, or offsite residential parcels; except that offsite event parking at nonresidential
properties is permitted with a valet or shuttle service.
Lastly, staff has received numerous documents relating to opposition and support since the staff report was
written. With the most recent submitted material coming as recent as yesterday, staff was unable to verify
these documents in time for the hearing. They are included as a supplemental attachment to this memo.
Attachments:
Support and Opposition documents received since staff report was written - (59 pages)
502 N. 44i, Street, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85008 (602) 372-0318 • (602) 506-3711 fax
>Mternet: www.maricopa.gov/planning
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Superstition Manor <john@superstitionmanorcom>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 1:31 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark PLANDEVX; Steve Chucri - DIST2X; David C
Farnsworth; Page Gonzales - DIST2X
Subject: 1152 n 107th st Mesa az
Attachments: IMG_1509.JPG; ATT00001.txt
Follow lip Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
The new owners of the property have signed in support. This now has us at all homes with in 300' are in support of our
latest narrative.
We have a total of 361 signatures and most are with in five miles of our facility. This overwhelmingly shows support for
our wedding venue and the changes we are asking for.
Thank you.
Nueva].
,W:QM No
.SUppOrtCllange..
Yes
• .::!...
Comment Comment Comment It Comment Comment- CornMent Comment Comment Comment
•
documents
and
reguest
amendment
• the
Center reviewed Address
Ivianor and
Event me to meeting
delivered Citizen
and to_
Suyerstition personally letter
Wedding Burns Invitation Narrative Plan
Z2014012 John 1, 2. Site 3. Name
Raymond Banker - PLAN DEVX
From: Donald Dahler <dp.dahler@q.com >
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:43 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Cc: annfar@gmail.com; Mike Cook; Jennifer; "Judith SchmieC; Ronald & Barbara Krainz;
Steve Chucri - DIST2X; Page Gonzales - DIST2X; Debra Stark - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor Opposition Petition Z2014012
Attachments: Anthony&Laura Gonzalez - Copy.pdf; Anthony&Laura Gonzalez.pdf; Chris&Rosa
Anderson.pdf; Judy&Tim Hood.pdf; LouiseTerrell & MichaelRecupero.pdf;
Ronald&Barbara Krainz.pdf; SSM petitionListSorted byParcel no.1NoADDRorPhone.xls;
Petition by Parcel Number.xlsx
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The attached documents are opposition documents to be included in the commission hearing on June 11,2015.
The first six (6) documents in adobe are e-mails from residents that I have personally talked to and they told me they are still opposed
to the expansion of Superstition Manor and to use their prior e-mail.
The first Excel document attached is a consolidation of all of the e-mails and petitions (including those attached) sorted by Parcel
Number for easy reference to parcel for location. I have personally verified that there are no duplicates in the list each name
represents an individual with a vested interest in the property total of 100 signatures. I have also listed each parcel that is represented
by the individuals. The e-mails have more than one signature and some have more than one parcel so original sixteen balloons into
thirty eight (38) signatures.
The last document or fast excel document attached is a listing of online petition signers sorted by Parcel Number with a total of 102
signatures. I have personally verified that there are no duplicates in this list.
There are a total of 202 signatures opposed (100+102) to the expansion of Superstition Manor. I have personally verified that there
are no duplicates between the two spread sheets.
Please, insure that all of the attached documents are included in the documentation presented to the commission.
Sincerely,
Donald Dahler
Group Leader
East Valley Property Rights Coalition
480 984-8061
Donald Dallier
From: Laura <alhgonzalez@gmail.corn>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 7:29 FM
To: Don Dahler
Subject: Fwd: Case # Z2014012
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Laura <alhgonzalez@gmail.com >
Date: April 21, 2014 at 11:17:42 PM MST
To: "rayrnondhankeramail.marleopa.gov " <raymondbanker@mail.maricopa.gov >
Cc: "darrengerard@mail.maricopa.gov " <darrengerard@mail.maricopa.gov>
Subject: Case # Z2014012
Anthony Gonzalez & Laura Gonzalez
1148 N. 106th Place
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel # 220-13-005B
Phone: 480-643-0295
To: Raymond Banker
Re: Superstition Manor - Case # Z2014012 —North West Corner Signal Butte & Brown Roads.
My spouse and I are opposed to the REQUEST AMENDMENT TO SUP, CHANGE
STIPULATION & ADD 4 ACRES, NORTH WEST CORNER SIGNAL BUTTE & BROWN
ROADS, SIZE 7 ACRES CASE # Z2014012.
We oppose the requested SUP that will more than double the size of the acreage covered by the
original SUP, that placed a commercial business on the residential zoned R1-35 property, for the
following reasons:
Increased vehicle traffic and congestion
1. Daily from four (4) to five (5) employee vehicles
2. During preparation for events
3. During actual events — currently allowed 120 vehicles to a potential of over 360 guest
vehicles plus employees and security vehicles.
Increased vehicle noise and air pollution from additional vehicle traffic that would not exist were
it not for this commercial facility.
Increased traffic will increase the litter and debris on our roads — we already get to much litter on
our roads.
Increased traffic will increase the potential for more drunk drivers on our roads (According to
Mr. Burns and Mr. Lake (at the meeting on the original SUP) we already get drunk drivers from
the horse arena).
Increased lighting from an expanded parking area and/or facilities — a large parking lot in a
residential neighborhood?
Increased traffic will increase road kill of our precious wild life.
Increased traffic will increase the potential for vehicular accidents that could be fatal.
Increased traffic with increase the risk of children being struck as they walk to and from bus
stops and friends homes.
The proposed expansion of the property will:
1. Disrupt the peacefulness and tranquility of the area
2. Hinder (if not prohibit)
A. Safe horse riding
B. Safe bike riding
C. Safe walking
An SUP was designed for the use of small family run cottage businesses not a major commercial
facility such as Superstition Manor.
2
The present zoning on the four (4) acres adjacent to Superstition Manor is to remain residential
R1-35 with NO SPECIAL USE PERMIT.
The present zoning supports the peacefulness and tranquility of the area and is why we bought
here.
It would have been helpful if the facility had been designed to blend in with the rest of the
community — IT DOES NOT
Sincerely yours,
Anthony & Laura Gonzalez
Sent from my iPhone
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.04569 / Virus Database: 3920/7386 - Release Date: 04/23/14
3
Donald Dahler
From: Laura <U1ligonza1e,z@grnail.com>
Sent.: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 7:29 PM
To: Don Dallier
Subject: Fwd: Case 4 Z2014012
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Laura <alhgonzalez@gmail.com>
Date: April 21, 2014 at 11:17:42 PM MST
To: "raymondbanker@mail.maricopa,gov" <raymondhanker@mail.maricopa.gov >
Cc: "darrengerard _imail.maricopa.gov" <darrengerard@mail.maricopa.gov >
Subject: Case N Z2014012
Anthony Gonzalez 8z Laura Gonzalez
1148 N. 1066 Place
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel # 220-13-005B
Phone: 480-643-0295
To: Raymond Banker
Re: Superstition Manor - Case # Z2014012 —North West Corner Signal Butte & Brown Roads.
My spouse and I are opposed to the REQUEST AMENDMENT TO SUP, CHANGE
STIPULATION & ADD 4 ACRES, NORTH WEST CORNER SIGNAL BUTTE & BROWN
ROADS, SIZE 7 ACRES CASE # Z2014012.
We oppose the requested SUP that will more than double the size of the acreage covered by the
original SUP, that placed a commercial business on the residential zoned R1-35 property, for the
following reasons:
Increased vehicle traffic and congestion
1. Daily from four (4) to five (5) employee vehicles
2. During preparation for events
3. During actual events — currently allowed 120 vehicles to a potential of over 360 guest
vehicles plus employees and security vehicles.
Increased vehicle noise and air pollution from additional vehicle traffic that would not exist were
it not for this commercial facility.
Increased traffic will increase the litter and debris on our roads — we already get to much litter on
our roads.
Increased traffic will increase the potential for more drunk drivers on our roads (According to
Mr. Burns and Mr. Lake (at the meeting on the original SUP) we already get drunk drivers from
the horse arena).
Increased lighting from an expanded parking area and/or facilities — a large parking lot in a
residential neighborhood?
Increased traffic will increase road kill of our precious wild life.
Increased traffic will increase the potential for vehicular accidents that could be fatal.
Increased traffic with increase the risk of children being struck as they walk to and from bus
stops and friends homes.
The proposed expansion of the property will:
1. Disrupt the peacefulness and tranquility of the area
2. Hinder (if not prohibit)
A. Safe horse riding
B. Safe bike riding
C. Safe walking
An SUP was designed for the use of small family run cottage businesses not a major commercial
facility such as Superstition Manor.
2
The present zoning on the four (4) acres adjacent to Superstition Manor is to remain residential
R1-35 with NO SPECIAL USE PERMIT.
The present zoning supports the peacefulness and tranquility of the area and is why we bought
here.
It would have been helpful if the facility had been designed to blend in with the rest of the
community — IT DOES NOT
Sincerely yours,
Anthony & Laura Gonzalez
Sent from my iPhone
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4569 / Virus Database: 3920/7386 - Release Date: 04/23/14
3
Dahler
From: Chris Anderson <chris@horizondevelop.corn>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 5:15 AM
To: darrengerald@mail.maricopagov
Cc: 'Donald Dahler'; 'Chris Anderson'; 'Rosa Anderson'
Subject: PW:
Categories: Red Category, Yellow Category, Purple Category
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Anderson
Az Investment Home Services
480-766-6434
ch ris@ ho rizondevelo p. rn
Front Chris Anderson [mailto:chris©horizondevelop.com ]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 5:11 AM
To: raymondbankerftmail.maricopagov
Cc: 'Donald Dahler'; 'Chris Anderson'; 'Rosa Anderson'
Subject:
Mr. Darren Gerald,
From Chris and Rosa Anderson. 10645 E. HilIview St. Mesa
Regarding case number Z2014012.
The superstition manor, wedding, party house continues to annoy the residents in the area.
Constant traffic, parking issues, flashing lights, drunk driving and disruption of the local neighborhood feel and lifestyle.
The residents also feel their wishes were grossly disregarded on the approval of the property on the first round.
Expanding on what already is mistake will only infuriate us further.
We live here because we don't want traffic, noise, party houses, just desert living.
The Manor house is 180 degrees the wrong direction on every one of those reasons.
We don't want the business, never wanted the business, and now they are trying to expand the business
TO ACCOMMODATE 245 MORE CARS! NO THANKYOUI VOTE NO!
Sincerely, Chris and Rosa Anderson
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Anderson
Az. Investment Home Services
480-766-6434
chris@horizondevelop.com
,
Donald Dahler
Prom: Judy flood ludytimh@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 2:36 PM
To: raymondbanker@mail,maricopa.gov; darrengerard@mail.maricop.gov
Cc: Donald Dahler
Subject: Special Use Permit 4 Z2014012
Attachments: 1-1PIM1278.JPG; liPIM1275.1130; HP1M1274,JPG; Sertification_.htm
Dear County Planner, 4/10/14
I am sending this email in reference to the Special Use Permit # Z2014012 that is up for approval.
This permit would enable Mr. Burns to enlarge his business; a business he says is NOT a commercial
business.
You approved a Special Use Permit last year allowing him to open a wedding venue that would be in
his "home", which at the time did in fact look like an average sized house for this area.
You should see this "home" now. It now has the appearance of a small hotel, at least tripled in size
since the first permit was approved. Pictures enclosed.
This area is in a Protected Upland Sonoran Desert Area. It is zoned R43, rural agricultural with single
family homes on I acre or larger lots and with horses and other farm animals. Most families have
horses and use Signal Butte Road as their access to Usery Park. Signal Butte Road is also a main
"trail" for hikers and bicyclists. There is no signage indicating such.
The residents of this area moved here for the dark night skies, quiet Upland Desert landscape, and
low traffic. And yes, we knew the area surrounding us would grow and bring more traffic, but it would
be traffic from homes, not businesses. It's a residential area, right? There are a few businesses run
from homes here. Not One of them has ever had more than a few cars in their driveways at any one
time. When you drive by the homes, you see a single family home like most of the
neighborhood. Superstition Manor can NOT claim the same, 50 or more cars daily, seven days a
week, morning and evening, times when the neighborhood is most active with the outdoor activities of
riding, hiking and biking. Traffic from this venue will make these activities even more dangerous along
Signal Butte and Brown Roads.
Superstition Manor acreage was plowed, and all native plants and animals were annihilated not
protected. The plants were replaced with non native species that require, in most cases, many
gallons of water daily. This is the desert. Water is at a premium. All native plants and trees on at
least 2 of the new 4 acre parcel he wants to use as a parking lot have been destroyed, not
protected. On the narrative report I was given, he shows the far southwest corner of the 4 acres will
be for his residence. So that makes the original "home" a venue for a commercial business.
1
Lastly, at the first hearing, he painted this facility to be a small, family run business. The "home" now
has restroom facilities for 400 people, a ballroom and already has parking for 250 cars. He wants to
expand parking so he can have 400 people on his property. This is NOT a small, family business.
This is a commercial business in a residential neighborhood. He was even complaining he couldn't
get a commercial loan after he denied vehemently that it wasn't a commercial business.
The traffic and noise is bad enough as it is. Expanding this FACILITY (hey, if it walks like a duck and
talks like a duck) is madness and wrong-minded. Please do not grant another Special Use Permit to
this facility. Please stop this!
Thank you,
Tim and Judy Hood
10620 E. Fenimore Rd.
Mesa, Arizona 85207
Parcel ID 220-13-016D
2
Donald Dahlcr
From: Louise Terrell <esmereldaw2002@yahoo.com >
Sent Saturday, March 29, 2014 6:21 PM
To: dp.dahler@q,corn
Subject: Fw: SUP Z2014012, Superstition Manor
Categories: Red Category, Yellow Category, Purple Category
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 6:20 PM, Louise Terrell <esmereldaw2002yahoo.com wrote:
To: planning board, Maricopa County
From: Louise Terrell
Michael Recupero
107 N 109th St
Mesa, AZ 86207
480-332-188a
( Parcel # 220-07-003C 7 )
I am writing with concern about Superstition Manor, and the new SUP. Although this SUP has not
been approved, Mr Burns has started construction on the next phase of his project. Every day I drive
by his new acreage, I see the work progressing. Is this OK with the planning board? Have you given
him permission to start this construction? It appears to me that Mr Burns doesn't think that rules,
regulations, & laws apply to him. He seems to think he can do whatever he wants. Maybe he
assumes you will grant his SUP, so he will just proceed.
For this reason, and because the neighborhood overwhelming opposes Superstition Manor, please
say no to the SUP Z2014012.
Sincerely
Louise Terrell
Michael Recupero
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4354 / Virus Database: 3722/7268 - Release Date: 03/29/14
1
Donald Dahler
From: Louise Terrell <esmere1daw2002@ya1oo.com >
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 3:40 PM
To: pdplanner@rnail.maricopa.gov ; dp.dahler@q.corn
Subject: SUP: Z2014012
To: planning board, Maricopa County
From: Louise Terrell
Michael Recupero
107 N 109th St
Mesa, AZ 85207
480-332-1889
Parcel # 220-07-003C 7
Subject: SUP Z2014012, Superstition Manor
We have lived at the above address for 10 years. We chose this house & property for the location,
among other details. We wanted to live in a rural desert community, & have "horse property". In the
vicinity, many of our neighbors have horses, and ride along the roads in this community. This area is
very quiet & peaceful. We respect our neighbors , the desert, & the wildlife. We enjoy star gazing, as
well. We want to live in a residential area, free of businesses. When we moved here, there were no
businesses, and none being allowed to develop.
We originally opposed the SUP to allow Superstition Manor to exist as a event center. The
overwhelming majority of the community opposed the event center. Only a very small number of
neighbors voiced their OK for the project. Unfortunately, the planning board voted to allow
Superstition Manor the SUP. Since the vote, Superstition Manor has expanded continuously. We all
Objected to the original size of the event center. Now, the event center is much larger, & can hold
even larger events. So, my guess is that they purchased the additional property to either expand
further, or make a very large parking lot? My husband & I were unhappy with the original size of
Superstition Manor, Now, we are even more outraged with the business, and what it will do to our
neighborhood, & property value! We want our neighborhood to stay a residential community. We
don't want any businesses in our neighborhood.
Our concern for the expansion of Superstition Manor is amplified from the original SUP last year.
This is a rural desert community. We moved here because we wanted the peace & quiet, to enjoy the
desert & wildlife. With an event center, comes increased traffic, increased noise pollution, increased
light pollution, increased air pollution. At events, will there be alcohol? If so, there will be an
increased possibility of drunk driving & accidents. With an increase of traffic, the wildlife that comes
near the road will be in an increased danger of being hit & killed. All of the bikers & horseback riders
are also at a higher risk of being hit or killed by event attendees. Increasing the size of Superstition
Manor and adding a large parking lot will add considerable traffic to the community.
In a democracy, the will of the people decides what will happen. The community overwhelmingly
spoke last time - we wanted our community to stay residential. My husband & I are speaking
again. We don't want Superstition Manor to be in our community. We don't want them to continue to
expand.
We oppose any business in this residential community. We opposed Superstition Manor. WE
OPPOSE THE NEW SUP. PLEASE SAY NO TO THE AMENDMENT TO SUP # Z2014012
Louise Terrell
Michael Recupero
1
Donald Dahler
From: Sent: AZRon Wednesday, <azrjk40@gmai1.coin> May 21, 2014 5:12 AM
To: Cc: raymondbanker@rnaitniaricopa,gov darrengerard@rnail.niaricopa.gov
Subject: Superstition Manor NEW SUP REQUET Case Z2014012
importance: High
To: Raymond Banker and the Maricopa County
Commissioners,
My spouse and I are against any revisions to the original
approved SUP and any expansion of Superstition Manor as
proposed in Case # Z2014012. The original SUP is to remain
unchanged with no expansion of land.
We were against the issuance of the original Special Use
Permit last year.
We now need to question Mr. Burns' real intention for that
land. Few events have happened since he opened the facility.
This is setting an unnecessary precedent that will ultimately
allow others to skirt the original intent of land use.
Sincerely yours,
Ronald and Barbara Krainz
1027 N Signal Butte Rd
Mesa, AZ 85207
(480) 288-2797
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3950/7534 - Release Date: 05/21/14
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0,4592 / Virus Database: 3950/7534 - Release Date: 05/21/14
1
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Superstition Manor <john@superstitionmanor.com >
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 11:57 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX; Steve Chucri - DIST2X; Page
Gonzales - DIST2X
Subject: Fwd: Scanned Petitions
Attachments: Petitions.zip; ATT00001.htm
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Petitions of support.
John A. Burns
Superstition Manor
480-560-4390
WWW.Superstitionmanor.com
Dreams,Family,Faith
Begin forwarded message:
From: <derek@superstitionmanor.com>
Date: June 9,2015 at 11:44:18 AM MST
To: i ohn(&,sup erstitionmano r. co m
Subject: Scanned Petitions
John,
Attached are your petitions,
Derek Deitz
Multi-Media Specialist
Superstition Manor
208.290.5603
1.
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
give my support to Superstition Manor for the expansion of the 4 acre lot just west of The Manor. This expansion will he a 2
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
, NAM F, PHONE # ADRESS-CITV-ST-ziP :
' - , --. • ,•• - ••,'• , h. ,
. „ /0 El 13
meagee
WEDOIN O "AND RECEPTlON HALL WITH IMMACULATE VIEWS OF THE SUPERSTITION MOUNTAINS
12211. ;Sigoul Bulk Rd Alum Ar 85201
000,79.391K,
,!,uprrsiiI ion orhnor.rom
1,1*.k !limn% 14801 7204535 (Coll or Trx1) -Ii.rd_suporNliliourrnnur,rOro
John 1111 r (-811) 5611-139(11( ;il) or Tull) - iolorirsullerilifionontool'xoni
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPLRS I II ION MANOR, THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE 4 ACRE LOT JUST WEST OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A? ACRE WEDDING PARK AND AlACRE PARKING FACILITY.
.DATE IyAME PHONE NUMBER ADDRESS, CITY, STAT , ZIP
k-v_rd-1) ..:Sqbq I 11 7(14 ILA Saa_
:143
LL i.Q.cdtrt_N '4/217`-.5-64k r
6
WEDDING /AND RECEPTION HALT MTH IMMACULATE VIEWS OE THE SUPERSTITICLN MOULITANS
1224) N 1440111 Ilntk D1Mrxit A. 55211'
(4302 79-3906
1.1Na flu - ,j 720-7535 (Call or Text) —1i,n1Trs11erVitiointwise,cohi
John Rot. I-180 560-4390 (C2I1 r Tfx(y — Oho qiiiinnnolon,com
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPERSTITION MANOR. THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE 4 ACRE I.OTJUST WEST OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A 2 ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING FACILITY,
NAME PHONE NUMI3ER ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP
, ck_c:sc, .)17.1
‘,7 C 2. 1.4 _
-32 - ir '2,, A
„ $ 1 1-1z
/C . 7", 7-, k
, 27 --k- 0 —A G C .-.
c:Le-- 0- e . G- ,i..e.,: 4.-.x z ' , ,,.-. r —P 41_ --, 2 ( ,----
,r-g 2,-. , ,,. -,,,,i,.,( c5 ,_.,,...-,r L .,
(-/ 3 J't 1)E. ±'',..:‘ 'id ?:,) m ,' k., , L i t= 4.-' ,,:,, ,_,4: , 2- 'ii " I-/- Ei 5 ....> "Z' , /V, 7/j1 -, ,../q- IL f e-7.,/
441 ' 5 „... Y `-',' / 7 2" ( --1--r- i_..., c : c : t -7-- .,..; - - sx-, ,y 5 -L.) ..----, -3 '-/"./ , _
r5- -- ... .,.. , J ' --- i, (7_, _ 1 , /4-1 ..
1
RECEPTION HALL WM'', IMMACULATE 'v%-+A'.$ OF TNE SUPERSTITION MOUNTAINS
tI N tiignal Hulk 14c1 NIR-vv At 81207
08[1}2:79-39B6
151k IS,11[11:Dtitilf19MAnDr,VIMI
jUlBlIr115 (4H11)7741-7S35 WWI or Tod.) —fiNui4:gtipastitionina novena)
,Rolvn I1ro (4140)560-43M Willi or -
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPERSTITION MANOR. THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE 4 p,criE LOT JUST WEST OF SUPERSTEHON MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A 2 ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING FACILITY,
_m_o_E_,_____ ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, 11- ZIP
ali--6).3 ,V1
V
- . v.:_, 0 Lt ci F!"-t-eg
._vitit....:44( 4 .)1Att -1(3 Z.5 ( YY j
(,— 1-0
/I/ -WO 1 i '4.fr' "5--7 '- y./ ' g.g/1" L2-137 /he , u e 5 -c
t i:-.::.'y_..i.-efc- .)/ .,e---- q5"-2 r /.912t. r7C.6"4
Li 7'2. . :)6:41,e-/..-1/01. 1::".4.1,0 _63.5 tVLoSe-
i tit i-. •
/) 1c, /911
. 7
_
tA
ii "P)
323';
2
Ft, 6
../itione3
WE DE)/NG FANO RECEPTION HALL WITH IMMACULATE VIEWS OF THE SUPERSIITION MOUNTAINS
1220 N Signal Hulk Htl Mesa Az 95207
080)279-3906
mils 9 sposiiiiusustil(,r.eiS11
Liss BurdS (490)720-7S35 0:4111 nr l'rxH—Ilssvir;sinstrslItIonnianor.roin
John Our (480) 560-439Q (Col!. r Test) -In hiarki:sitliersliliniuns non um
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPERSTITION MANOR. THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE 4 ACRE LOT JUST WEST OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A 2 ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING FACILITY.
DATE NAME PHONE NUMBER ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP
-
, i•••-( AV I.'.
6.2
/
• ,S7,-,•=-1 -7,. -
tyg) AD. Ofcr/Ara
(1,-(1- 11 5' 1 6-04 TA. , AL 'a .-,2-61
-.4 -3.35 C Lo st D t_t4 n cs-5
HLQP
:Tvn louoLta.;11,-„,e,-) f Tio 15. LcD RiZ,J. j I) Cit f1e.c0-
r Y-11c6 Dbk 'N-keW
200,
c9fe)freme.e4e
"" I.oerr,,,,ATF_ VierNS OF THE SUPERSTITION MOUNTAINS
I N *Ind MAR Rd Memi •e NS20I7
(18513/9-39011
Lk% Rums (Oil) 7211-7535 pc rstitiminiumucconi
Runt. T.MIld $60-1390 OTH11 1111- MB] Ii.suirersdlianirianor.ctuu
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPERSTITION MANOR, THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE 4 ACRE LOT JUST . 0VES•1 OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A 2 ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING FACILITY.
PHONE NUMBER A.D.OPESS, cm, STATE, ZIP
t''. qYZ, /6-..t1 (C v e
2.,....-: - '71 -, ... ---- • 3.1).;-- c - , -- . ...{ , / ,.
'41--7 (,.. -1,- Ld. 111 C: . .'
v
./..74-9/..-7,A44, '7).,— c.--,..-e.,y.. .-•':, 4.,,5,,,,/
6,0 2 Lill 6, ==.7,c, -1..)--1 C. i-iy.... (.7i4,2..._ LA- . -.12Aq,,,. `c x..a ..).._
-°°'''--.0 DY. 61 ..k, a..,:P.-,.. reif /1E, / i.,,e .4 Cd.-.e. 19:2.,K
(d".)2._ I -ti 91_61_ 2g6t.., „; c,x),.-,,.., 4- (-to, fl-A-,y...,A-2_
4em
WEDDING' drAND nrcepTioN HALL Valli 4-141ACLILATE VIEWS OF THE SUPERSTITION MOUNTAINS
1220 N Siprot MON 341 Mvsti 85205
145511215,1544
LISA Burm 415011,210-1535 4(1 or Tod) -liNiLtruperailimorsiriormarn
John 110r R5 (4814) 545-43511 it 'all or Ie.., - iLdslairrailionnothar.,coro
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPERSTITION MANOR, THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE 4 ACRE LOT JUS1 WES r OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A 2 ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING PACILITY,
DATE NAME PHONE NUMBER ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP
1 _3 F 1317- I/ C C 5 ji
Y` / )6, AL' /1,)t2H ../ 4 in' tE: - • .>Z,- )
93,
NO RECEPIION HALT WITH tIALACULATEVUNS OF THE SOPERSTiTION MOUNTAINS
I 2211,iSiiiiI Butte lid :V,. 85207
TiNflP79-39diS
nar.cum
I 1 litienS(4-891 12.1115.1 .5 Wall or Ito superslitiimminor.tom
Joh 1.1.f,IrIp41010 50.4,19i) Trxi)
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPERSII I ION MANOR. THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE 4 ACRE LOT JUST WEST OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A 2 ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING FACILITY,
, . ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP
/f1 a, 4
74: „ )0„,- f..t e or_ ,itt2, -)
-(3,1
,3_34{E) (L- f Sfi it, f-
1Lj }--
-
7y7, _
WECIDIMG "'AND preEPTION HALL WITH IMMACULATE VIEWS OF 1HE SUPERSTITION MOUNTAINS
121flNSIgns1 Hunt. Rd 1.1m :V/ N51411
.0114. .. I.:1 1;47Nrns.112117);h3mg7va4.ctiiii
I.kaLierB 445517211-751S 0:211 Ii ic%0
AMID Morn% 4480.1 560—$1911 4ttili isr —
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
Ill E. EXPANSION OF SUPERSTITION MANOR. THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE +I ACRE LOT JUST WEST OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A 2 ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING FACILITY.
DATE I Per N ps. PHONE NUMBER ADDRESS, STATE, ZIP
g - 7
„Lf2-
,)
r .. -2 . . 41 f b ._ , Rit2.1t. , n. 1.i t .L
.....,.5.2.,.L.------1.s-2--- 24- / - 1 )+-. .j 1 -1... [ L(.,'.?.-).0 J _..'i ;.. 61,„ illtc(- A
/ ..d, z ..:, . .J yi . -1 N , ,..—o., .—ek ee..<.,..y-
tv16-1 ,_ 1 _7:3 -3 .2 E rz .LI_Cit-LOd AL=.4,6 ,S-25.2z)
,
, —
-2/
b
AND RECEPTION HALL WITH Imo.o.cutArE vwxys oF 3 Ha SUPERS:MON VODN1A{NT%
lflIi N STglia I HAAR- Nitsra 8OT
(04279,1'106
sS
Tisz ilurns1-18111,7Z11-7535 (rilt Teti) —1b./Teesuiwrsliilionmitor.corri
John Hunts 1.48IH 5f00-13911 Wall or I cL o suprrstiLionntimormmi
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SU RER.S11 Ift31\1 MANOR. THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE 4 ACRE LOT JUST WEST OF SUPERSTITION MANOR REM DEVELOPED
IN f 0 AZ ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A Z ACRE PARKING FACILITY.
DATE PHONE NUMBER ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP
. S , (.0 '1 k it
1(16 6 7 4
7 s, :7 ro
-NY) CC-4-
gic co-) 3 I, /3/6c kc'', roc_ e" a- /12_
7 --74 -_3.7 4 E t""L, z c.f37
Ce- tte:i -5c)63 (r. 6,1 ri- fiL "
w'H!. 871,22 .1,;1 ‘DLE) a =5. Oe3
(:& s—z 3 zyle
S20 _227- 32 2'21 e..a„..1), trei e
Cy P{ &Ai sc, ,--(1..e. ,33eic;,
1-2F .17)
- - 0 - "i"; 41: 5 1'5—c (ttv ?_ 570AY
,355 1
1."'°:3'ic
,NED1111,1G "'AND FA.L •°t
12211 N SIgusl Bull, Rd Mtss Az 85207
(4/1111279-3.906
ssujt,wpernitionnisnotwout
1.1sz Bunts 1411111 7211-7535 ((alf err Tt's1) -11s-art resupt` tstifinunsuor,runt
,Intin Burns 14801 Sfi0-090 (Usti or 1 rst1- Julitois.uperst1Usnrusnorsetni
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPERSTITION MANOR. THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE ACRE LOT JUST WEST OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO AZ ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING FACILITY.
ATE NAME PHONE NUMBER ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP
'1;4 t- cy_titp, •
fog/. czez 01/4„ -zrrt - 5 e,5•1
/i X.e/z- 9/9 -YeC
200 3921'1
J44.. . /AO Ltkx-Nri .6 \it C..2,Li.A1, 1- rizA.523q
.1421,1 - .,
•••
j
• ' •••.%
4 loc F (4J. izci.
e , 1 r'7(
6/4",i,-71
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
I give my support to Superstition Manor for the expansion of the 4 acre lot just west of The Manor. This expansion will he a 2
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
NAME PHONE # ADRESS-CITY-ST--ZIP
L4I(2'.!(. •,- 1-1 L
11.
77.'S I ft:A
L""----;,, -)-'re• .-••- 1 •:.j.".,-;.,..--., .:,.-1,, ,- .7,.;- -, 4:±,-. ,
[ I .•.
eit:194
'WEDDING NECEPTIO.', ,I)LIL(7 — \
7 (1! 1,4/1 - /-77
PE't:),, ily144ilirr:'
I give my support to Superstition Manor for the expansion of the 4 acre lot just west orThe Manor. This expansion will be a 2
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
NAME PHONE # . ADRESS-C TY-ST-ZIP
el.- 7 (7-,, I 1 7%V .7 ji()-3,4-,/ ALt--- 14L'e,
-7
Lds
t .') IL; ./ .4 1,• -•, i ....i,_ i)1... , 14 . iL;.1 1„17:i .21 -Z
24-iftdr LiC6.6 (62c) te : k Cc-,S, alp° V:e..,
,) [4 IJ ' -•-.;I: -1".), •'!.__) f,-• .; -.' .1 -i •'*. -.,• 3 7' ..° 1
. '--•,. ,..) '•-•-). - . (II ' .• . . '-' - _:ii . -j•A - •It__ ,.i.'! ...j_ .,.. --,---1_. .. ),-,,.. 0 1 / • [---.> 1 `-' .' -
.-•.':)'47.' --J: / /---' I•-' 3 _., - . : ..4 71 -.I:... ;:
Tco., ; i.1-A,-.-..-.4 - ;‘,.-,.. ,: -k:.. 6 „VI.) z•--_ , R.
q„, ... -1. .1:';-' 1,'Z' Pie..,
e0e441edee41, /tea
WEDDING AND RECEPTION. E .6 2'' --E E-Or'ERS -
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
I give my support to Superstition Manor for the expansion of the 4 acre lot just west of The Manor. This expansion will be a 2
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
DATE NAME' PHONE #
(9 ;ILI
(Li
v-3 r
-
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
I give my support to Superstition Manor for the expansion of he 4 acre lot just west of The Manor. This expansion will be a 2
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
NAME PHONE # ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP
„.I - „
V14.0OINC "FANO RECEPT ION HALL VLITTI-3 IMMACULATE VITAS OF THE SUPERSTITIOH MOUNTAINS
1220 N Sig11111 Hum Rd IV us4 Ai B207
0801,279-39N
i..1S1.A.persORImmAmoram
Twi Burn', 14801 7211-753.5 (('II or To.11 17'..11flaSiiii1P111112nnr.rnlit
Jti if Lulls (MI) 5M14.01111 (Call or 1 -01) inlm taillel slibilronanorenio
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPERSTITION MANOR. THIS EXPANSION WILL INCLUDE THE 4 ACRE LOT KIS! WEST OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A 2 ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING FACILITY.
INECIDilSG dfAND RECEFTiON HAIL WITH INIMACLITADE ViENA'S OF THE SUPERSTMON MOUNTAINS
122/1 N I Mirk. ICII N1117.
(I:111)27III-3906
river. .supaNriliunninnur.ront
Lisa liurns148111,20-75.15 I Cali l'cvS)
•101m IlurnN OM!) firNOLPII (cull lir I ira
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
THE EXPANSION OF SUPERSTITION MANOR. THIS EXPANSION WIL I. INCLUDE [HE 4 ACRE LOT JUST WEST OF SUPERSTITION MANOR BEING DEVELOPED
INTO A 2 ACRE WEDDING PARK AND A 2 ACRE PARKING FACILITY.
ilfir,-'. fitg$it ,
69q f/ L1,- . -/' CA P//
. C _//j 'c . -•-(..; .':'-'-..!?
j 23q4)7P,10/1.(11.--'1LCjii . -
±1 F, 6 .6, .""i'L. "‘.;..,±6-..ki I.--)i-z
£.4 -1 r"...eer
'7'71 67._ ,, qt4 tit ' P.,
. • _, , .. . , , , , -,7)..,-, iytt(l L j)fi, At' c•A-c=0,?'_;.77 Li- ,,6-(.: 4.1-.1
—I -7 ftlz.to , ph
11,1:3 t, t-7- _.1) 1 .- ti_7/, 1., 4 iz Al ...,
'1-(1:) I )ir Loa - . , -
WEDDING,ArAND RECEPTIfOr%
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
I give my support to Superstition Manor for the expansion of the 4 acre lot just west of The Manor. This expansion will he a 2
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
PHONE# ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP
"I , s I :if
V.V1:111ING.ZAND RECEPT 40 _1 "-E , E,s — .7••••,
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
I give my support to Superstition Manor fur the expansion of the 4 acre lot just west of The Manor. This expansion will be a 2
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
DATE NAME PHONE # ApRESS7OTY-ST-ZIP
'
!!.
LL1 "
- L. JCL • ._......... (' . 7.-
••• • t •
. . .
L.'.
N., '
• t LI LA •- •
' IL ...H\ 1 ' 7 /-4 C7:
STRATTON PATRICK/LEANNE
BOX 1872
WHITECOURT, AB T751PG CANADA
MOD !NG "'AND F10E
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
I give my support to Superstition Manor for ihe expansion of the 4 acre lot just west of The Manor. This expansion will be a 2
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
I give my support to Superstition Manor for the expansion of the 4 acre lot just west of The Manor. This expansion vvill be a 2
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
DATE NAME PHONE it_ A DRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP
I
Y,1? -- 7
:1 • ,
• I j • C'L _ (
'
PETITION IN SUPPORT OF
I give my support to Superstition Manor for the expansion of the 4 acre lot just west of The Manor. ThiS -6-iparision will be a Z
acre wedding park as well as a 2 acre parking facility.
PHONE A DRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP
..".L'..-: C. e.,,,, --oi e y..- ...5V- ' .. /1 <-...L.... .
- , 7- :-.7;"..,. -../..:4",- - -;(e.--; ::-- ./ 7751 , , ..,-//),-2---/-
qgb -.70 Y.3-33 ii,-_-). 0 / F....6-1( .//) kA -1,$) 7:1-1 ( 6:2 71 .712- i:_-s :,) • /
15A-1 7,.J ‘.:•T (.2 .::=; 5.1,1 ./, 4....,...: ....':'.:...."_. --t .=,) L., .44,,, ,_56.------- , 79 i.."
-t) .;.-,-L 1 ;.,i'! i 14111f-d. t:' ri '1‘ -':' , IVZ-• (-; 'C - 7 ! '.'i
O.\ L:f:,... '4,1 (..„121,p,.. VI • L-•-,' t.,..,1 .4t-..., .1 .:...HP, .4-1, TI
LI Co ,56;-=:-.150 7 52-6) -A eixA_A(ii2... ,-;4 .-1—' _ s
7 7 - LI el z !,,, , - 2_ eiz) _,/-1_,...,„
4-18"0 - 617-- (.4 o 7-6 112,40 6 . pc", ry., Ave.. /1/ke4s,k. 8 5.21 2,
0 \ - _S.f,-Jac
'-iAll 7},(-- (fin)-- -3 S--'t,o Ili. 9,1v-7- y... %t_ -r's ',.J -c._-:•,. (..1----.
-5 7,5-7 -7i3 Z.- 0,(4 Z 4 --lz-e il,-) r,c <•-i -.-.1 7 4r-J7 /
.±j_sp- 3 All 6 0 d 9 5 • oe At_ emt, lui i Deraiya_k_K, • r .8.,--1-•:2- q _F
P) P)S 24 5.c' ejan 4 39i
R76e-
237.3T 72 ...5- Q)- ci. ' .7f-
Ye -4' r — ,•• 7177- e,Se.----1.-'-':•;771-,-7- ' 7
/ -a
_ 't)6 _ -2_(P_ adey9 1 f
140 5/C '14377 (
r v 1,4 Ts-Q-7.10--49-7.19 112 1-41 ' if z-c)
(2>_ ' SCo 115J, n AE S-7-)3
,Cti6 ('' .( 12 ( f'-f • (A)Ct “11-) CiVal h 0-7
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
To: Kelly Newell
Subject: RE: Fwd: Superstition Manor Case Z2014012 opposition petitions
From: Kelly Newell [mailto:newell.kellyProcketmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 10:02 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Cc: johnsuperstitionmanor,com
Subject: Pic Fwd: Superstition Manor Case Z2014012 opposition petitions
Hello Raymond,
I am writing you to let you know that my husband Aaron and I were written in as being opposed to the
amendment, when in fact we are in Support of it. Please take this email as our official word, along
with documentation provided to John Burns as our support of the amendment.
Thank you,
Kelly and Aaron Newell
1129 N. Signal Butte Rd, Mesa, AZ 85207
480-229-2781
#
Parcel
by
Sorted
-
Signatures # J L 004A
D Parcel 108 1670 0360 080 013 015 069 078 069 287 444 130 53116 258 576 093 289 35 002 090 475 699 391 599 605 216 289
13 51 102-09-018 08 03 27 18 08 17 22 135-03-020 138-02-076 38 38 56 140-08-181 65 68 32 67 141-05-260 -09-1 141-27-046 35 176-24-029 54 10 211-15-029 24 60 31 08 08 24 40 218-06-212
102 102 103 104 104 105 117 118 135 140 140 140 141 141 141 141 141 141 160 203 206 213 215 217 218 218 218 218
Opposition 4/26/15
Z2014012
MCCARTNEY
C Name Catalano Friedrichs Bickle Anderson
Case Catalano Strathearn Nichols Esnil Lundberg Rundio Hahn Robertson Mussemann Norstrom Higginbotham Moulthrop
Ruth Spencer Watt Wood Tiberi Hardin Banta Chaildin Jones Sitler Evenson Qualman Smith Mazur Cipolaro Bean Smetana Hacker McKearn Kirkpatrick Norstrom
County Watson Stephanie CHRISTINE Georganne
Renee Jeff Helen Allison Margaret Birgit Michele Cynthia Diletta Laurel Dennis Jonathan Mark Susan Michael Kay ferdinand Gregory April Sharlene Steve Greta Evan Nora Chris Joseph Joy Randall Steve Mark Kyle Wessley Laura Tanya Brian 2015
Maricopa 0
0
JUN
RECEIVED
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
l
H
G
#
Parcel
by
E
Sorted
-
Signatures # V E D D A B M G
D Parcel 906 031 002Y 259 577 005 007C 009 009 010 020 454 015E 018 034 001 014 038 058 862 708 064 192 563 225
218-06-212 218-06-476 218-53-419 17 21 24 24 219-24-002Y 219-49-043 219-49-132 01 02 03 03 07 07 07 11 13 13 13 16 20 74 85 220-03-049 220-85-146 02 301-68-434 301-68-774 37 302-96-453 37 303-42-218 303-73-729 04 04 28
219 219 219 219 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 220 301 302 303 304 304 304
Opposition 4/26/15 2
Z2014012
parcel
c Name
Case Casteel Kirkpatrick Kirkpatrick Ashton Kirkpatrick Voss Saurin Rockafellow Church 2nd Ramsey Williams Vidinha McNiff Sullivan Osterling Slams ramsey Howard
Smith Leonard Blandford Mugge Hutton Saad Ellington Lichter Leon Cooper Baker Bedson Wait Oxborrow Read Ely Riley Bailey Haidle
County Smid E
Shea Burton Cristy Rick Shawn Diane Colleen Charles Karl Jocelyne Todd Barbara Roger Diane Joe Chris Paul Steven Mary Tom Carrie Kathy Lisa Sherry Kimberly Eric Shane Claudia Richard Susan Monica Robin Gabriel Dan Sandra michael Virginia Troy
Maricopa
B 1
A
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77
#
Parcel
by
Sorted
-
Signatures # E
D Parcel 448 436 108 108 311 326 105 539 362 896
41 74 304-04-597 304-27-902 304-51-160 304-70-063 304-97-021 304-97-021 06 06 07 308-06-106 09 309-19-194 310-02-216 310-02-216 310-07-455 03 03 312-01-202 312-03-501 313-02-640 313-05-445 313-16-090 04 16
Opposition 304 304 308 308 308 309 312 312 314 501
4/26/15 3
Z2014012 Burgess
C Name JOHNSTON
Case Murray Henriquez SIMIENSYK Brunner Andrus andrus Hennessy Hennessy Brown Wojcik Bengtsson Bengtsson Hernandez Borden Gaines Tismeer McCall Talley Covington
County Anderson fraijo Metcalf Shallue Shisler Book
Ten Richard Cecilia LINDA noe SUsan Randy shelly Kaitlin Terry Tracy Claire Mike Kim Angela Brad Richard Glenn Brian DONALD John Roger Susan Jennifer Neall Jim
Maricopa
1 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
IPETIT05-2
AREA. SUP.
IS
PROPERTY. LIGHTING, FURTHER THE AND APPROVED (.I
#21014012. IN AREA u,..,..—___ nc }(\._,Apt 2015
22012086 R1-35 WILL RIDING THE THE — Age_v 1 d-C--- -L,F ,---,_ .7%/L 08
# CASE POLLUTION, BIKE OF TO SIGNATURE GLQ .) ,._ ‘2n 6,./„.1. L Sz /iv:--V'16r)(141 JUN
CASE PROPERTY & ----__ Lii\CLACLA-t. .
MISC. RESIDENTIAL AIR HORSE TRANQUILITY CONDITIONS . V ) Li .0 Z.--e-
MANOR & & THE I. c RECEIVED
NOISE OF SAFE A' it 7 P E et15-6-. P
PARKING the USE AND STRICTER NO. POS-E 0.1ir 641-0,I3A ON /-j3-00-B -13---00-574 i9.--0-5-
on PROHIBIT PAI-0.,L PHONE g/0-C4---0-/30 cl.- - 2V-09-tw =0-0Y--.0,13/) 07- -13, glo-)3-06%57)
SUPERSTITION CONGESTION, INCREASED ADD Supervisor: Councilman: pa:-J- .2./0- =e- 0 42 L,70
FOR ADDITIONS NOT PEACEFULNESS & ph: pa: ph: pa: ph; ph: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: : ph . pa: ph: pa: ph: Pa: ph: pa ph:
WEST & IF
FOR TRAFFIC PROPOSED HINDER THE UNCHANGED
permit THE BUILDING
TO THE WILL SUPPORTS
use and INCREASES: KILL. IT REMAIN
ACRES AND
special IT ROAD AREA AND SHALL (Print)
2.5 CONDITIONS AS & ONLY
SUP DRIVERS THE USE SITE SUP ADDRESS e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-maiL: e-mail: e-mail : e-mail e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail:
APPROVED ADJACENT THE OF
SUP TO R1-35
THE the DRUNK TRANQUILITY RESIDENTIAL
THE OPPOSED
TO OF of POTENIAL FOR RESIDENTIAL
ARE AND
CHANGES ADDITION RELAXATION ALLOWS THE Representative: Representative:
BELOW ROADS, t-k-) 5
ANY THE any SIGNED ON PEACEFULNESS ZONING HERE. Area: Mesa: (Print). 1IAr r r‘c.-.1‘. Me-Clee__ Mc6rc,— CAMOk 1 iM7Ai 't u:fier e Uldif Lak..)\0,(-
4)1 .r./Y17 1"e.bki i
OPPOSE DEBRIS THE BOUGHT County Area: of NAME Itkilej '' Aki lk. s i 561
OPPOSE OPPOSE PARTIES & PRESENT WE City City --3 it 'iv\ A4;4 Za ',V R\ \ c...a.
WE AND WE THE LITTER DISRUPT THE WHY Maricopa Mesa MAYOR .i-61171.- Tr(-{,ii ficv}61, Kr'Is- Nockae- 1—) ' Kthe Cul
AREA. SUP. PETIT05-2
IS , , , -
PROPERTY. FURTHER THE AND
Z2014012. LIGHTING, IN APPROVED - - ."/
Z2012086 WILL RIDING AREA lir e"-------- •
# R1-35 THE THE SIGNATURE 4FIAT , ft ,, #44. , ta11
# CASE POLLUTION, PROPERTY BIKE OF TO - .7 ,..___./ / l ..., - ei -.7------7:-::-.7
CASE & "WI --- 1 .....------ niorr 'vlifze .. c-Fit),___ .------
MISC. RESIDENTIAL AIR & THE HORSE TRANQUILITY CONDITIONS (1 "---,- (.7 P 1
MANOR & NOISE OF SAFE I - F- IL g r P
the USE AND STRICTER NO. NO. 7L 06.7F ,-. 4,07 2/-ao6 it--cv CM -
PARKING on PROHIBIT PARCEL PHONE pa,0-61-0071„ 1 0 v.--- o ,7„0/0---CY-086'w 0 8.- ,Z2D--0--4/06'S a.2P-q..-678{S 010-cuit-OdirP ZO-eli-007P .---.0 4 VS-el-ft-0JY.
SUPERSTITION CONGESTION, INCREASED ADD Supervisor: Councilman: pa:Z2P-- ,210-- pa:Z2,0--1 • LSO
FOR ADDITIONS NOT PEACEFULNESS & ph: ph: pa: ph: ph: ph: pa: ph: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: ph: pa: ph: pa. ph:
& IF
FOR WEST TRAFFIC PROPOSED HINDER THE UNCHANGED
permit THE BUILDING
TO THE WILL SUPPORTS REMAIN
use INCREASES: KILL. IT
ACRES and AND
special IT ROAD AND SHALL (Print)
2.5 AS & AREA ONLY SITE
CONDITIONS SUP THE ADDRESS
DRIVERS OF USE SUP e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail:
APPROVED ADJACENT THE
SUP TO 41-35
DRUNK TRANQUILITY RESIDENTIAL R
THE THE the OPPOSED
TO OF of POTENIAL FOR RESIDENTIAL
ARE AND
CHANGES ADDITION RELAXATION ALLOWS THE Representative: Representative: •
BELOW ROADS, g._ 0-41` 1444 k\( .._,P 014_4
THE ON PEACEFULNESS ZONING HERE. Area: -t,--v:t a...0 D)1•IP2,v- ,;- j ) h Rmtc -ee0e5 4viAcv-,_ ) 0,4C-Frk
ANY any SIGNED Mesa: (Print) i., Sik G3St CI,V4;\ "1 iSz,fII
DEBRIS BOUGHT County Area: of 9 cl t) ' A U 1 C,ta-i rit
OPPOSE OPPOSE OPPOSE PARTIES & THE PRESENT City NAME 1 rC )FrF4d,q aid &,1) .1
WE City --E,f) 1;?-1(4-e, aecit Bed-k -e)ft.IAA'SflA(
WE AND WE THE urrER DISRUPT THE WHY Maricopa Mesa MAYOR _ .,..si ---5)1), (1.2i'e5 '6\e,..c.
'
AREA. SUP.
IS
PROPERTY. FURTHER THE AND APPROVED
Z2014012. LIGHTING, IN
Z2012086 WILL RIDING AREA ----'
# R1-35 THE THE SIGNATURE ... /-4110AKW- Air ......•
# CASE POLLUTION, PROPERTY BIKE OF TO O ......_ . •
CASE & --r• Air
MISC. RESIDENTIAL AIR THE HORSE TRANQUILITY CONDITIONS ' 0m- _. , de •',
MANOR & I so
& NOISE OF SAFE , 1 9 3.-1-13
the USE AND STRICTER NO. NO. =.-0/IF , i 0 2.-AgZ8- 0
PARKING on PROHIBIT PARCL PHONE - OG1- 6---C A- o -
SUPERSTITION CONGESTION, INCREASED ADD Supervisor: Councilman: ale- 0 2,70
FOR ADDITIONS NOT PEACEFULNESS & J Pa: ph: a: p . ph pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph. pa: ph- . pa ph: pa: Ph' Pa' ph: pa- ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph:
WEST & IF
FOR PROPOSED HINDER UNCHANGED
TRAFFIC THE
THE BUILDING 0)/F.
permit TO THE WILL
SUPPORTS REMAIN
use and INCREASES: KILL. IT
ACRES AND AND
special IT ROAD SHALL (Print)
2.5 CONDITIONS AS & AREA ONLY
SUP THE SITE ADDRESS
DRIVERS USE SUP e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail:
APPROVED ADJACENT THE OF
SUP TO R1-35
DRUNK RESIDENTIAL
THE THE the OPPOSED TRANQUILITY
TO OF of POTENIAL FOR RESIDENTIAL
ARE AND Representative: Representative:
CHANGES ADDITION RELAXATION ALLOWS THE I T
BELOW ROADS,
THE ON PEACEFULNESS ZONING HERE. Area: /'6a11/2//724----,12
ANY any SIGNED Mesa: (Print)
OPPOSE DEBRIS THE BOUGHT County Area: of _ City _ NAME ilF/if re/
OPPOSE OPPOSE PARTIES & PRESENT 777 7,/
WE City fr/j/1 /
WE AND WE THE LITTER DISRUPT THE WHY Maricopa Mesa MAYOR l'P -7-2:i`P L>Di
Ls .,/
AREA. SUP. PETIT05-2
PROPERTY. LIGHTING, FURTHER THE IS AND 11
Z2014012. IN APPROVED •h.:— 4A-------
Z2012086 WILL RIDING AREA .e.i,--J41 ,
# # R1-35 POLLUTION, THE THE SIGNATURE IIMIIIIIMI 11111111.111 1111.1111.111
CASE CASE PROPERTY BIKE OF TO coht ithihiee-,_
&
MISC. RESIDENTIAL AIR & THE HORSE TRANQUILITY CONDITIONS 11111
MANOR & NOISE OF 1 I I
PARKING the USE SAFE AND STRICTER - NO. NO. 4 0/6-A-
SUPERSTITION on CONGESTION, INCREASED PROHIBIT Supervisor: Councilman: PARCEL PHONE ' :.1.0-04--ols- .220-04t- pa:/-
FOR ADDITIONS NOT PEACEFULNESS ADD & ph: Pa: ph: pa: ph: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: Pa: ph: pa: ph: Pa: ph: pa: ph: Pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph:
WEST & IF
FOR TRAFFIC PROPOSED HINDER THE UNCHANGED
THE
permit TO BUILDING THE WILL SUPPORTS
use INCREASES:. KILL. IT REMAIN
ACRES and AND
special 2.6 IT ROAD AREA AND SHALL (Print)
CONDITIONS AS SUP & THE ONLY SITE ADDRESS
APPROVED ADJACENT THE DRIVERS OF USE SUP e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail:
SUP TO DRUNK RESIDENTIAL R1-35
THE THE the OPPOSED TRANQUILITY ,
TO OF of POTENIAL FOR RESIDENTIAL
ARE AND
CHANGES ADDITION RELAXATION BELOW ALLOWS THE Representative: Representative:
ROADS,
ANY THE any SIGNED ON PEACEFULNESS ZONING HERE, Area: Mesa: (Print) FWAJA/ -e-v i 1 F1/;Q.A(
F
OPPOSE DEBRIS THE BOUGHT County Area: of NAME dfru K'amle6-179.if. .1111111111. 1111111111=1 1111.1111111 MIME 111111111111111___ 11.111...11 1111.11111111
OPPOSE OPPOSE PARTIES & PRESENT WE City City 21-i\felit1I .KQI-ilierl
WE AND WE THE LITTER DISRUPT THE WHY Maricopa Mesa MAYOR /6-A1 IIIIII
AREA. SUP. PETF05-2
IS
PROPERTY. LIGHTING, FURTHER THE AND APPROVED
Z2014012. IN
Z2012086 WILL RIDING AREA
# # R1-35 THE THE SIGNATURE
CASE POLLUTION, PROPERTY BIKE OF TO ri,-,•-rries"'")
CASE & „ pek
MISC. RESIDENTIAL AIR THE HORSE TRANQUILITY CONDITIONS
MANOR & & OF
the NOISE USE SAFE NO. -613C C. -7O?fl
PARKING on AND STRICTER PARCEL-NO: 054-Oa 2.20-07-ao3
SUPERSTITION CONGESTION, INCREASED PROHIBIT ADD Supervisor: Councilman: PHONE - 2)._6-en
FOR ADDITIONS NOT PEACEFULNESS & pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: h: a: h: a: h: I a: I h: I a: 1 h: I a: I h: I a: 1 h: I a: I h: I a: 1 h: f
WEST & IF
FOR TRAFFIC PROPOSED HINDER THE UNCHANGED
permit THE BUILDING THE I/ A
TO WILL SUPPORTS
use INCREASES: KILL. IT REMAIN
ACRES and AND
special IT ROAD AND SHALL (Print)
2.6 AS & AREA ONLY
APPROVED ADJACENT CONDITIONS SUP DRIVERS THE USE SITE SUP ADDRESS e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail:
THE OF
SUP TO DRUNK RESIDENTIAL R1-35
THE THE the OPPOSED TRANQUILITY .
TO OF of POTENIAL FOR RESIDENTIAL
ARE AND Representative: Representative:
CHANGES ADDITION RELAXATION BELOW ROADS, ALLOWS THE _ _
ANY THE ON PEACEFULNESS ZONING HERE. Area: Nor_51-rovil- e C I-I I-,F-f /L-
any SIGNED Mesa: (Print) PE P#
DEBRIS THE BOUGHT County Area: of Fii-ye_tivce F-0, /WI P
OPPOSE OPPOSE OPPOSE PARTIES & PRESENT City NAME Ni41-P
LITTER DISRUPT WE Maricopa City MAYOR R.O.SatAvi.e.- \,...„0 FOK
WE AND WE THE THE WHY Mesa -3.0 P 0
AREA. SUP.
IS
PROPERTY. FURTHER THE AND
Z2014012. LIGHTING, IN APPROVED PETIT05-1
Z2012086 WILL RIDING AREA
# R145 THE THE
# CASE POLLUTION, PROPERTY BIKE OF TO CL. 5_
CASE & NO. 0'6'a 370 --cl-rITE -01TE 17 -COI
MISC. RESIDENTIAL AIR & THE HORSE TRANQUILITY CONDITIONS PHONE ,2,,,Z0.-01-A-VX 01-00/ I - e - 0.77- ot O - I i 0 - 0/
MANOR & NOISE OF SAFE Supervisor: Councilman: .1.20- g_,Qc 307- a.To Xe.0- -ia go 1-1C- :1,.20-
PARKING the USE AND STRICTER pa: ph- Pa: ph: ph: pa: ph: Pa: ph: ph: Pa: ph:- ph: pa: ph: Pa: ph: ph: ph: Pa: Joh: ph: pa: ph:
on PROHIBIT
SUPERSTITION CONGESTION, INCREASED ADD
FOR ADDITIONS NOT PEACEFULNESS & -
& IF
FOR WEST TRAFFIC PROPOSED HINDER THE UNCHANGED
permit THE BUILDING THE WILL (Print)
TO INCREASES: IT SUPPORTS REMAIN
use ACRES and KILL. AND ADDRESS
ROAD AND e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail:
special IT AREA SHALL
2.5 CONDITIONS AS & ONLY
SUP THE SITE
APPROVED ADJACENT THE DRIVERS OF USE SUP
SUP TO R1-35
THE the DRUNK TRANQUILITY RESIDENTIAL
THE of OPPOSED , . .
TO OF POTENIAL FOR RESIDENTIAL
ARE AND Representative: Representative: +Z. -okme_r 1) -rzs)i Lfi -11,-.../
CHANGES ADDITION RELAXATION BELOW ROADS, ALLOWS THE (Print) ir ,1 - D
PEACEFULNESS HERE. NAME S-Gkevx iat.barnort) P0 6-11GLN\-Sc,\(\mi.if2_,_ #8,1,7 WOG-evacA,fit'
ANY THE any SIGNED ON ZONING Area: Mesa: don
OPPOSE DEBRIS THE BOUGHT County Area: of - 'Se- DM') 1-14-/er ‘1 Ti),A94,-
OPPOSE OPPOSE PARTIES & PRESENT City City
WE
WE AND WE THE LITTER DISRUPT THE WHY Maricopa Mesa MAYOR Ficre 1
47. rotor-
SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
e<feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
V
I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte Road
and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
,
ei I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds of
guests.
Ilincerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
6/ I have othe7 7777117777`7 71,777777" IC • .-tc,.);':..))%tr.lr
AAjk ktrude___}
1,
I agree with the above statement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
e
• Signature te4A,1 / Date f Izcs
• Printed Name CA Ai .) L _ C
• Parcel Number 22' 0 E- 0 (ZY 06-- •
/...
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
V
I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte Road
and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
cifi I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds of
guests.
Hricerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
(.. I have other comments I concerns as follows:
?ALI
0
(
1 agree with the above statement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
• Signature z,tiztzt(7 (I4A L /Date C/ bc-C
• Printed Name II il\r) t t.,-ur21 C." L_A—Rk
• Parcel Number .2ao-as"-C2m6"
_
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
eVifeel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
V
I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte Road
and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
Cif I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds of
er_ guests.
Anni Ioncerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
(<- I have other comments / concerns as follows:
(1,eikci 0-ay-K.— Gvvv--,--- Put,de._)
I agree with the above statement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
• Signature is
• Printed Name CLA Or\ C L1 R
• Parcel Number 2- 2 0 - 618-0 L 7
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
followinoyeasons:
K) I feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
K) I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte
Road and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
K) I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds
of guests.
K) I am concerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
K) I have other comments I concerns as follows:
What I find incredulous is that just when I think things can't worse and I don't have to re-commit time to
address an issue that I originally opposed, that being the original Special Use Permit for the Superstition
Manor, now the residents in the area are currently tasked with battling this expansion coupled with all that
goes along with raising a family, paying bills, etc. As I understand this process, It could well become a sort
of a "groundhog day" for those of us that opposed the original Special Use Permit and now the expanded
version of the same (we will have to re-visit this for years to come). This will no doubt be a recurring theme
In our lives and I find that bizarre, as when I purchased my home in the county island, I did not expect to
be defending peace and harmony, property values, and unforeseen traffic, I made some observations
before the original Special Use Permit was approved by the Supervisors and they were as follows: Mr.
Burns spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in betterments to his property before he obtained the Special
Use Permit. Why would a businessman expend that quantity of money gambling that the Supervisors would
approve the Special Use Permit as his venue benefits himself financially, not the community in which it is
situated. As I stated previously, I have no idea why one would spend hundreds of thousands of dollars
without first obtaining a Special Use Permit. It is the perception of some that the approval for the original
Special Use Permit was a foregone conclusion. There appears to be no other plausible explanation other
than this was bound to happen no matter what the objections were.
Now while we await the next decision regarding the planned expansion, I drive by the Superstition Manor
and see that construction to the west has begun. The parcel to the west has been regraded and there is a
block wall being constructed. Once again it seems that it would be a risky proposition to begin spending
thousands of dollars without first having the Special Use Permit emendation approved and in hand. It
appears to one commoner who purchased a home in a residential area with no businesses such as the
Superstition Manor, that there is something radically wrong with the sequence of events that led to the
ratification of this permit, as one would expect that a Special Use Permit first would be obtained and then
betterments made. I am frustrated and do not feel confident that this area will remain non-commercial as
history is repeating itself again. I invite each of you to come to my home and I will demonstrate why
residences that are beyond 300 feet of the named property are most definitely impacted in a negative way.
I agree wIth the above statement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
Signature / Date_4/9/2015
• Printed Name _IVIartin & Felicity Grossman
• Parcel Number 220-04-010V
SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
K) I feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
K) I feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte
Road and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
K) I am opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds
of guests.
K) I am concerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
K) 1 have other comments / concerns as follows:
What I find incredulous is that just when I think things can't worse and I don't have to re-commit time to
address an issue that I originally opposed, that being the original Special Use Permit for the Superstition
Manor, now the residents in the area are currently tasked with battling this expansion coupled with all that
goes along with raising a family, paying bills, etc. As I understand this process, it could well become a sort
of a "groundhog day" for those of us that opposed the original Special Use Permit and now the expanded
version of the same (we will have to re-visit this for years to come). This will no doubt be a recurring theme
in our lives and I find that bizarre, as when I purchased my home in the county island, I did not expect to
be defending peace and harmony, property values, and unforeseen traffic. I made some observations
before the original Special Use Permit was approved by the Supervisors and they were as follows: Mr.
Bums spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in betterments to his property before he obtained the Special
Use Permit, Why would a businessman expend that quantity of money gambling that the Supervisors would
approve the Special Use Permit as his venue benefits himself financially, not the community in which it is
situated. As I stated previously, I have no idea why one would spend hundreds of thousands of dollars
without first obtaining a Special Use Permit. It is the perception of some that the approval for the original
Special Use Permit was a foregone conclusion. There appears to be no other plausible explanation other
than this was bound to happen no matter what the objections were.
Now while we await the next decision regarding the planned expansion, I drive by the Superstition Manor
and see that construction to the west has begun. The parcel to the west has been regraded and there is a
block wall being constructed. Once again it seems that it would be a risky proposition to begin spending
thousands of dollars without first having the Special Use Permit emendation approved and in hand. It
appears to one commoner who purchased a home in a residential area with no businesses such as the
Superstition Manor, that there Is something radically wrong with the sequence of events that led to the
ratification of this permit, as one would expect that a Special Use Permit first would be obtained and then
betterments made. I am frustrated and do not feel confident that this area will remain non-commercial as
history is repeating itself again. I invite each of you to come to my home and I will demonstrate why
residences that are beyond 300 feet of the named property are most definitely impacted in a negative way.
agree with the above statement(s) Indicated by my checkmark.
Signature / Date_4/712015
• Printed Name _Martin & Felicity Grossman
• Parcel Number 220-04.010V
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
As a
resident
SUPERSTITION MANOR WEDDING & EVENT CENTER IS PUSHING
of the FORWARD TO EXPAND THEIR FACILITY TO HOLD MORE WEDDINGS &
East PARTIES EVEN THOUGH RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY ARE IN
OPPOSITION!
As a resident of the East Valley Rural Community, the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors needs to know what you think!
I oppose the expansion and Amendment of the Superstition Manor SUP Case #2014012 for the
following reasons:
VI
feel that a wedding/party venue does not fit in with the character of a residential community.
04feel the risk of impaired drivers departing local wedding venues and traveling Signal Butte Road
and Brown Road is too great for this rural community.
04:m opposed to the amount of noise generated by an outdoor wedding venue hosting hundreds of
guests.
OVram concerned that I may have to disclose the existence of this venue as a neighborhood noise
nuisance if I were to sell my house.
0 I have other comments I concerns as follows:
I agree with the above statement(s) indicated by my checkmark.
o Signature / Date
• Printed Na 7-2—A-4‹-aJ z Mi
• Parcel Number /J'23
YOUR VOICE COUNTS
Donald Dahler f iAza,4-
Subjeck FW: Opposition Superstition Manor Case ilZ2014012
Original Message
From: Kate Flinn <teezers378Reol,com>
To: Raymond Banker <raymondbankermail.maricopalov>: M Darren Gerard <darrennerard(maii,maricoba.gov >;
Debra Stark <debrastarkAmall.maricobamov>; Steve Chucri BOS2 <chucrismail,maricopaqov>; PageGonzales D2
<cionzalespOOlamail.maricopagov>
Sent: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 1:51 pm
Subject: Opposition Superstition Manor Case #Z2014012
TO: Maricopa Plannino & Development: Raymond Banker, Darren Gerard, Debra Stark
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, District #2: Steve Chucri, Page Gonzales
East Valley Property Riohts Coalition - Donald Dahler & Residents
FROM: Rodney Flinn, Randall & Kathleen Flinn, Property owners of Parcel Numbers 220-04-015 and
220-04-016A.
CONTACT: teezers376aol.com
Please Count this Email as our Statement of Opposition to this Requested Amendment
RE: Opposition to the Superstition Manor Wedding and Event Center SUP Expansion Case #
Z2014012
Parcel 220-04-014Y (Formerly known as Parcel 220-04-014W and 220-04-014S)
Northwest corner of Brown Rd & Signal Butte Rd.
Opposition to the Request to expand onto adjacent parcels to the west (Parcels 220-04-013K
and/or 220-04-013G)
Dear Planning Staff & Supervisor Chucri,
This is a request to deny the Amendment for Case #Z2014012 for the Superstition Manor Wedding
and Event Center and to Deny any Expansion and SUP changes for this facility including site plans,
additional structures and parking. We are oposed to any Amendment to the SUP for the above
mentioned Event Center.
Our property has been owned by our family for several generations. We can appreciate and
understand the tranquility and serenity the desert life has to offer.
We also understand why many people would want to have their weddings and special events in such
a setting. We recognize that Superstition Manor Wedding and Event Center was created for those
reasons,
However, special thought and planning must be implemented to fuse the neighborhood and
community together for long term interests.
It is, in our opinion, best to keep this venue at it's present size without further expansion and growth.
Please understand that the entire community will be affected by your decisions.
We appreciate your attention to this mailer.
Sincerely,
Rodney Flinn
Randall Flinn
Kathleen Flinn
1
L
Donald Dahler
From: Bob and Pam <rayraemoody@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 3:01 PM
To: Donald Dahler
Subject: Fw: Superstition Manor SUP expansion Case AZ2014012
From: Bob and Pam .
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:22 AM
To Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject Re: Superstition ,Manor SUP expansion Case #Z2014012
Yes, include in the case file.
From: Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Sent: Wednesday; March 04, 2015 9:37 AM
To Bob and Pam ; Steve Chucri DIST2X ; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX ; Raymond Banker - PILANDEVX ; Donald Dahler
Subject RE- Superstition Manor SUP expansion Case #Z2014012
The SUP case is public record. If you wish to comment on the SUP then this will be included in the case file. It will be
public record and will not remain confidential. Please advise if you want staff to print and include this email in the case
file.
From Bob and Pam [mailto:rayraemoody@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 9:35 AM
To: Steve Chucri - DIS iZX; Debra Stark - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Donald
Dahler
Subject: Superstition Manor SUP expansion Case #22014012
REQUEST: Information should be confidential
My wife and I purchased parcel 4220-04-013E prior to the economical implosion and prior to the property
known as the "Manor".
The parcel we own is directly north of the property owned by Mr. Burns, The history of expansions seem to
infringe closer to our property, resulting in our strong opposition to any new expansions or relaxed laws
regarding the amount of persons allowed at the "Manor" for entertainment purposes.
The proposed expanded parking area will be within 300 feet of our property and we OPPOSE the parking lot
expansion. We also oppose any changes to any of the current SUP stipulations or addition of any more
building or any site plan changes or easing of any restrictions.
Thank you,
Robert Moody
Pamela Moody
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 429919226 - Release Date: 03104/15
Superstition Manor
Hand out
1220 N Signal Butte Rd, Mesa, AZ 85207
480-560-4390
Owners: John & Lisa Burns (Burns Family Investments)
Premier Wedding & Event Center
Presentation for Major Amendment # Z2014012
Superstition Manor, which is nestled in front of the enchanting
Superstition Mountain, has operated for two years as a premier
wedding 8, event center, conducting weddings for east valley
residents, professional athletes, doctors, lawyers, and military
members. Other types of events include LDS meet & greets, east
valley kids' baseball, basketball, and football banquets, Mesa School
District Jr. ROTC awards banquets, and non-profit funeral receptions
for the needy. Youth groups, political groups and more have
requested functions at Superstition Manor. We are now a vendor for
mesa school district.
Each and every wedding is designed and coordinated in a movie-
like fashion. From the minute the bride and groom arrive until they
depart, every moment is planned out to create their day exactly
how they've imagined it. Our pre set-up for their special day can
take up to 8 hours.
Faith, Family, Happiness
a
1
To begin the day, the bride and bridesmaids have their hair and
make-up professionally done, sometimes taking upwards of three
hours! Once the bride and the bridesmaids are ready, the
photography begins. Both sides of the bridal party then walk the
property as the photographer starts capturing memories that are
sure to last a lifetime.
A few examples of happiness captured in photos around the premises
Each wedding can take up to a year of planning and coordinating.
Once the photo sessions are complete, it is time for the bridal parties
to relax while their beloved friends and family arrive. As guests arrive,
they are greeted by an officiant or ushers while light ceremony music
plays in the background. Once everyone has arrived, the ceremony
begins.
Above: Oct 20th, 2012, the 1st wedding at Superstition Manor- Melissa Burns,
(daughter of owners John & Lisa,) celebrates her wedding day after a battle
with Leukemia. We provide a place where prayers and dreams really do come
true; a place where family, faith, and hope and happiness are eminent.
Immediately following the ceremony, a cocktail hour takes place.
This enables the guests to socialize with refreshing beverages and
appefizers.
Reception and dinner follow the cocktail hour where many of the
traditional wedding ceremony activities take place. There is the
magical father-daughter dance, the mother-son dance, cake
cutting, and, of course, champagne toasts to the bride and groom's
well-being and forever-lasting love. A photo booth is also set up to
capture everyone who attended the ceremony.
At the appropriate hour, the bride and groom are then sent off
under the glimmering light of sparklers held by their guests. This is truly
a magnificent sight, portraying love, hope, and faith to all who are in
attendance.
Bride & Groom First Dance
Father Daughter Dance
Each day we look at the manor to see how we can make if better, more
efficient, and more attractive. Thousands on thousands of people have or will
attend a wedding at Superstition Manor. So, please, join our supporters in this
crucial amendment for not only our business, but our many satisfied married
couples to come.
In our society there are a great number of religions. In many religions, a bride
and groom are required to be of the same faith to get married in a church. For
example, we recently had an LDS Bride and a Catholic groom where we
performed a ceremony and reception. Neither church nor Temple would allow
them to be married in the church or temple due to not being the same religion.
Churches also do not allow for the reception to take place nor do they have the
facility to offer it. Being a non-denominational venue we open our doors to all
religions. 70% of ceremonies and receptions occur in a non-church setting. The
reason why most venues are in residential areas is because of the views, the
non-commercial environment, and the home feelings it brings. Bride and
grooms always say they are looking for somewhere that is comfortable and
gives them the sense of a home when entering into a lifelong partnership. The
majority of weddings are held in residential areas including gulf courses,
community centers, Val Vista Lakes, The Wright House, Stone Bridge, Superstition
Manor, etc. Recently, Pinal County Board of Supervisors approved a wedding
venue in a residential area directly in front of the Superstition Mountain.
Wedding venues belong in communities so that the surrounding residents can
be close to home and not have a commercial feel to one of the best days of
their lives.
Wedding venues are a place of religion and faith. Each wedding held at
Superstition Manor has some facet of a religious ceremony from communion for
Catholics, to the breaking of a glass for the Jewish faith. Almost every wedding
consists of a ceremony and reception and has prayer with many different verses
of the bible being read. At dinner a prayer is said to bless the food and the
people who are in attendance. Superstition Manor serves as a wedding chapel
for many couples that still want to be true to their faith but cannot be marred in
their church. Churches are allowed in residential zoning.
Superstition Manor has had 173 ceremony and receptions conducted for 2014
and the beginning of 2015. We have 184 events booked for the remainder of
2015 and for 2016. This past weekend we presented our venue at the Phoenix
Bridal Show, and, in a one day show, had 231 brides and grooms fill out
information cards to possibly have their weddings at our venue. Since the start
of our venue we have had 514 tours conducted in which there was no booking
due to unavailable dates. WOW, the community overwhelmingly wants our
wedding venue, (We are sold out.) We conduct 10-20 venue fours a week, and
our bookings will be low based on not having any dates available. Most
weddings are Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, and we have none of the days left for
2015 and are very limited in 2016. We have had brides and grooms that reside
within minutes of our location.
Per national vital statistics reports (NCSR) the average marriages in Arizona from
2000-2009 are 35,300 weddings per year. Weddings occur almost evefy
weekend in every neighborhood from venues, churches, back yards, parks, golf
courses, and desert weddings.
It took Superstition Manor one year of working with Maricopa County Planning &
Development just to 'get to the Board of Supervisors. After the Board of
Supervisors approved the special use permit, commercial building permits were
applied for and issued. The pre SUP cost was over $50,000 and now, to date, I
have invested well over 3 million dollars to establish a state of the art wedding
venue that caters to all faiths. We have had every inspection from building,
health department, air qualify control, fire marshals, and the list goes on.
Superstition manor was required to convert to commercial building codes at a
great cost.
6uPl"d
crluebuit
MARICOPA COUNTY
cro 6u,ppod
Application Name: SUPERSTITION MANOR MAJOR AMENDMENT
Legal Description
T01N RUE 011,71 N R07E •!, 1
'Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
IJOHN A BURNS 480 580.4390
JOHN4SLPERST/TIONMANOR COM
Casa Address Parcel Primary: 220-04-014Y Z2014012
1220 N SiONAL, 81./1 4 Rd
MESA Az 85207
220-114-013_0,2lo-D4-01nK
Generated May 28,2015 10:0S:10 AM Gross acres: 7 approx, Map scale: 1:2,400
Aerials Sep-Oot 2011
SUpervisor District Na. 2
SUP MAJOR AMENDMENT
Merlopa Counfy PiarmIng & Development - Phoenix, AZ
Front Entrance
East Signal Butte Rd
Northwest Corner
Signal Butte Rd
Southwest Corner
Brown Rd & 117th St
MITECIEffal
West side of property from 107 th St
"
Power Lines Easement
Future Parking
Most of the land that surrounds the Manor is vacant underdeveloped land. The
power lines will never be developed due to easements. I have purchased the
[and around the Manor to create a buffer from residential area.
r.-11
6 3
H
SNIHSVII
NY a
SNICOMO
21111S
N01/10ad
GNY
-01SHWAS1ING and LINEN STORAGE ADDMON MOS STUDIO
SUPERSTITION RECEPTION MANOR CENTER u - I RESILIENCE EVENT CENTER P.O. AIRCHETECTUR 990 11...1.9.4.KW4W,152-11,
ree,c MOWN
FT 1
72'1
,356 sf.
.=••I•I1. NIIII.M1M1=11 I••••II ••• .II• .61.1041I•• swl .1II
MST FLOOR 2.772 F.
SECOND FLOOR 3,365 sr.
RUB-TOTAL FLOOR AREA 6,528 SF. (alea Mowed by apploval a 3304 SF., NOT INCLUDING PATIO 1
1,530 SF J area of natio an boomed otaa 612 SF.)
FIRST FLOOR TOTAi FOOTPRNT 3,302 3F,
REDESIGNED
Parking Expansion and Relocation
In order to improve the aesthetic for the neighborhood as well as provide more
parking for guests and over-sized parking, we have devised a site plan that will
accommodate a more acceptable parking area for all.
Operations Building
As our company has grown over the past two years we have found ourselves to
be running out of kitchen space and storage, both of which are crucial in order
to accommodate fully for grooms, vendors, and florists. In order to operate more
efficiently in an ever-increasing competitive market, we deem the addition of
an operations building extremely necessary for both increased efficiency,
organization and comfort for our guests.
Storage Building
Our offsite rental business is growing rapidly. We foresee this business to continue
to grow as our main customers are bride and grooms whom cannot afford the
cost of one of our wedding venue packages. Many parents choose to have
their daughter's wedding in their backyard. Our services offer a complete
wedding for a fraction of the price of on onsite wedding. Since we offer a
complete set up for such offsite weddings, we are forced to store over 1,000
chairs, 150 tables, over 1,000 tablecloths, 5,000 napkins, 5,000 chair sashes, 400
centerpieces, candles, vases, silk flowers, photo booths, portable bars, arches,
and many more items. We have set up over 20 backyard weddings within a ten
mile radius of Superstition Manor.
Staff Report
After reviewing the staff report we are in agreement with most items that
Maricopa County Planning has placed. However, there are stipulations and
conditions that are being rewritten from our original SUP stipulations and
conditions that we cannot agree with.
Conditions:
A. Allow 3400 square foot building foot print with patio cover and second
floor for grooms and groomsmen dressing area. See floor layout. The minor
amendment had a patio. Add patio.
C. We do not agree with our vested rights under original approved SUP to be
superseded. We have contractual agreements that this would interfere with. Our
expectations of our vested rights must be protected. Our vested rights expire
March 27, 2023. All parties must be in agreement to alter or change.
F. Add unless summer heat causes a delay to replace trees that cannot be
planted. Planting guidelines will be utilized for this purpose.
G. Remove March 27, 2023 and replace with August 1, 2030 in order to gain
commercial financing.
I-1. Remove no operations shall be conducted outside of these business hours.
Replace with cleaning, set up, and catering preparations can be conducted
indoors only from 11pm-8am Friday Saturday and lOpm - 8am Sunday -
Thursday. As well as Landscaping and maintenance conducted outdoors from
6am-6pm all days. If an emergency occurs as in an AC unit an emergency
repair can be conducted at any time.
K. Remove one hour time limit/add light back ground music within 20' of
main structure except on the north and west side of building. Light back ground
music cannot exceed 55DB at any property line. All speakers must be shielded in
ceiling of patio by a minimum of two feet. Light back ground music is only
allowed between the hours of 12pm-8pm daily.
M. Remove paved and stripped. Add 4" recycled asphalt with parking
attendants at every event to guide parking only in authorized spaces.
Recommendations
Add 5000 square foot storage building for business personal property. This
building is allowed in R1-35 zoning and we do not exceed maximum allowable
square foot per zoning rules. Storage yard relocation to this area from the north
wall area of the original SUP.
Please consider the above listed amendment conditions so that our vested
rights are not diminished in any way from original stipulations and conditions of
special use permit.
Our request is to extend to a 15 year SUP so that we can gain commercial
financing since the county required the whole building to be a commercial
building code. This was completed at a very large cost. I have been turned
down for financing due to the short time period of the SUP. 15 Year commercial
loan is the only option. Currently Maricopa County assessor's office is taxing my
property at commercial rates. However, I am not afforded the full use as a
commercial property.
Sound Study & Security
Sound study by a Sound Engineer was conducted and there was never a time
where any music violated any Maricopa County Noise Ordinances. Almost at
every event there is an Off Duty Maricopa County Deputy Sheriff on the
property conducting security. Noise meters have been a requirement for the
deputies to take sound and noise reading every hour at all property lines.
Charles Hart Code Enforcement Supervisor for Maricopa County has been to
our property on Friday and Saturdays to check the noise levels and he has said
to me and reported back to the director that he could not hear anything at the
property lines. We have screened our property on all sides to mitigate any
disturbance to the neighbors. Brown road with the trucks, motorcycles and loud
hot rods make more noise then we will ever make. The noise from Brown road
over powers even our amplified ceremony music, especially if the motorcycle is
at the light and revs its engine for three to four minutes. We have had it where
the Ceremony was delayed for several minutes while the light was red. Many
neighbors have requested us to hold a BBQ with music and water slides for the
kids; however we have removed that from our Narrative. Schools have asked for
functions which we have also removed from the Narrative. We have revised the
Narrative 9 times to date, trying to make everyone happy.
Superstition Manner
10744 E Brown RD, Mesa,
AZ 85207
Date: •• 2-,)
Security Log In Form
Name Agency/company Badge# in Out event
2)
3)
4)
Remarks
t _ 1.., , A e'r C . 1 4`.•_ r_.
t
3)
4)
Incidents
Property line check
Sound & parking lot
6pm 7pm 8pm 9pm lOpm
r=•"; 3 t L t_ Lk t
I 1 t„. LL
- A _ -7,
r
: A e-,„? f`ik C.1 C '5,
1 'T 4 , s-14z
7". — : z
r ckg!..1,-; t • C ts.":T
tISt-J :" • %...)'s --L I, '7
In closing
We are not requesting a new SUP, only major amendments to the original SUP.
New stipulations or conditions that were not presented should not be added
unless all parties agree that It best serves all parties and the vested rights and
expectations of the reliance of the permits that have been issues by the Board
of Supervisors and building permits. If the stipulation change occurs, we would
have to cancel weddings that have been planned and contracts have been
signed. Law suits would occur, and hearts would be broken.
Rachel Applegate - PLAN DEVX
From: dp.dahler@q.com
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 10:15 AM
To: PZAppeal
Subject: Appeal of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Appeal of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Case Number/ Project Name: Z2014012 Superstition Manor
Plarming & Zoning Commission Hearing Date: Jun 11, 2015
Appellant Name: Donald Dahler
Mailing Addressl: 1115 N. 109th St.
Mailing Address2: Mesa, AZ 85207
Telephone Number: 480 984-8061
E-mail: dp.dahler(&,q.com
Reason for the Appeal of the subject case: At the beginning of my presentation the computer system went out
and I was unable to properly present my testamony. After my testamony was completed the computer was
working again.
New River/Desert Ms Community Association, Inc.
PO Box 75068
Phoenix, AZ 85087-1000
NEW RIVER/
DESERT HILLS Phone 602-432-2800
Ttiagit Fax: 623-465-1177
As$ociatIon, Website: www.NRDHCA.ORG
President's email: Alan@NRDHCA.com
Re: 22014012 (Major Amendment to Special Use Permit (Z2012086) for Superstition Manor).
Dear Supervisor Andy Kunasek,
The New River/Desert Hills Community Association (NR/DHCA) board is concerned about the Planning and Zoning case
Z2014012 (Major Amendment to Special Use Permit (Z2012086) for Superstition Manor). This property is not in our
area; it is generally located at the northwest corner of Brown Rd. and Signal Butte Rd. (in the east Mesa area). However,
the outcome could have negative implications for our area. As you know, NR/DHCA is a leader in a rural community that
encompasses approximately 30,000 residents.
We are concerned that if this is allowed and sets a precedent that we may see a similar case approved in our area. The
evidence that alarms us includes:
• The succession of amendments transforms the development to be less rural and more urban commercial. They
appear to have side-stepped doing a zone change to conduct an ongoing large commercial business in a rural
area. (Refer to Staff Analysis #16 Supporting References page) Also see http://www.superstitionmanorcom .
• If approved, we think the original SUP (Z2012086 interim use with a 10 year tirneframe and required status
reports) provides some protection that the use will not extend incrementally beyond the original request.
• As Staff pointed out in the original request, the expanded storage building (off-site rental business) "would be
an expansion of the business to a warehouse type of use and further movement towards a commercial zoning
district type use." (Refer to Staff Analysis #18 Supporting References page)
• Increasing the hours of operation to 10:00 p.m. Sunday —Thursday increases disturbance of the rural residents.
• Increasing the parking lot size of 151 spaces translates to more traffic than is customary for a rural area.
Considering they promote that they can handle 250 guest (plus vendors, etc), it is easy to foresee them
requesting more expansions.
• This is not "temporary" use; events are held practically all weekends and frequently during the week.
• We would not want "visitors" to determine the fate of our community; a large number of those that favor the
project are not local.
• The City of Mesa responded that the use is not consistent with the City's general plan and the City of Mesa does
not support the request for further expansion of the existing use. (Refer to Staff Analysis #24 Supporting
References page)
Regards,
Ann Hutchinson
Planning and Development Liaison
New River - Desert Hills Community Association
PO Box 75068, Phoenix, AZ 85087-1000
Email: plan-dev@nrdhca.com
www.nrdhca.org
1
SUPPORTING REFERENCES
Staff analysis:
16, The request for an additional 15 years from the BOS approval date is not supported by
staff. The original SUP (Z2012086) was approved as an "interim use" with a 10 year
time frame and required status reports. The limited time frame was approved due to the
public opposition received by staff during the SUP process. Staff believes this timeframe
is still adequate as the applicant has expanded the site with two Minor Amendments
and this request for Major Amendment in less than two years of SUP approval, As this
subject site becomes more commercial in nature, staff would like to see this use reevaluated
when the SUP is closer to expiration to see if an extension is appropriate at
that time.
18. The proposed "operations building" consisting of a two-story 8,116 sq. ft. dish washing,
laundry room, floral room, groom's suite, and storage area and proposed attached
1,157 sq. ft. patio cover is not supported by staff. After staff visited Superstition Manor, it
was evident that storage space was becoming an issue. However, the applicant was
approved for a total of 3,400 sq. ft. which included a kitchen addition and two new
storage buildings with Minor Amendment (Z2014021). The applicant never built the
approved additions where the "operations building" and patio cover is now being
requested with a much larger area. Since the site plan approved for Z2014021 did not
include the 10' PUE easement with the approved plan along the west portion of the
property, staff would have allowed a reconfiguration of the 3,400 sq. ft. approved to
meet zoning guidelines (as the pmposed additions would be encroaching on the PUE).
The applicant never resubmitted a revised site plan for these acceptable changes.
Thus, staff is in favor of having the 3,400 sq. ft. approved previously through Z2014021
applied toward the storage building(s) and kitchen addition.
24. Staff received an email from the City of Mesa on March 18, 2014 when the Major
Amendment was first applied for. Their stance is stated as being very much opposed to
any further expansion of the current use at this location. Superstition Manor is part of the
City's Desert Uplands area and their General Plan Designates the area for very low
density residential uses. City of Mesa responded to the Amendment changes on May
26, 2015 and stated that their position on the matter has not changed.
Media Coveraqe
*As published in The Republic on June 12, 2014
Mesa-area wedding venue Superstition Manor drops
expansion plans -- for now
Maria Polletta, The Republic I azcentral.com 10:10 a.m. MST June 12, 2014
There's a reason that the third time, not the first time, is the charm, according to John Bums.
"Any business, when you first do it, you realize there are things that you need to change or didn't think of," said
the owner of Superstition Manor, the controversial wedding center that opened in northeast Mesa last year.
"You should be able to have some latitude ... to modify things."
2
But the same circumstances that make Superstition Manor appeal to brides — it's nestled against the backdrop
of the Superstition Mountains in a quiet, residential county-island area sharply limit how much latitude
Burns has.
Two months after filing for a major special-use permit amendment to expand the wedding center and its
operations, Burns has withdrawn his application in light of pressure from county officials who told him they
wouldn't support it.
"Prior to Mr. Burns seeking the expansion, we were hearing bits and pieces in terms of neighborhood
complaints, but nothing of major substance," said Maricopa County Supervisor Steve Chucri, who represents
the district. "When he went and filed for an expansion of the SUP, I think that's what triggered, 'Whoa, whoa,
whoa. We don't want that.'
"There's a place for these two, commerce and the neighborhood, to go together. But to expand it would not meet
the best interests of that neighborhood and the community."
Burns bought the 3-acre property near the corner of Brown and Signal Butte roads in 2011 after his wife urged
him to take on the dilapidated fixer-upper. After pouring tens of thousands of dollars into renovating the
facility, Burns sought permission to live upstairs while using the first story and outdoor area for weddings and
receptions early last spring.
The move spurred vehement and lasting opposition from neighbors, with more more than 200 people signing
petitions saying the development would disrupt the area's rural, residential character with added noise, traffic
and lights.
"The decision I made last year was really based on private-property rights. I made one person happy and 300
people unhappy," Chucri said. "Now, we find ourselves in the converse of what we found ourselves in last year;
I need to protect the property rights of the neighbors."
Burns said his pursuit of the amendment — which would've allowed for more people, more parking and a 1-
acre "wedding park" where brides could take photos and guests could walk trails — stemmed from the robust
success the venue has had since its opening. He said he has sunk more than $2 million into the property and
would be willing to invest more if officials backed him.
"We're turning people away," he said. "There are so many brides that want to get married here, we're booking
all the way out to 2016 already. It's just been gangbusters."
Though he acknowledged ongoing tensions with certain neighbors, Burns said none of their complaints had
resulted in formal violations of his permit, which the county confirmed.
He said Chucri was "dead wrong" for limiting recent conversations to residents of the Scarface neighborhood to
the north when several neighbors to the south of his property support the expansion.
Chucri said finding the neighbors adjacent to the property heavily opposed Burns' effort was all he needed,
because "the basis was not there to support an expansion if those closest to the property didn't."
Burns said he likely will pursue all or some part of the expansion again next year.
3
PAUL H. McALLISTER
201 W. Circle Mountain Road
New River, AZ 85087
Date: 15 June 2015
To: NR-DHCA, INC.
Review by Date: ASAP
Case: Z2014012 — Superstition Manor.
Planner: Darren Gerard
Type case: TAC ri BOA 171 Other Board of Supervisors
Meeting Date: unknown
Property Location: Generally located at the northwest corner of Brown Rd. and Signal
Butte Rd. (in the east Mesa area).
Applicant: Owner John Burns
Request for: Major Amendment to Special Use Permit (Z2012086) for Superstition Manor.
Opinion: I have reviewed the Maricopa County P & D Staff recommended conditions that should be included
if the request is approved. The most relevant conditions are as follows:
a. demands Site Plan revision including
• delete, 5,000 s.f. storage building, 8,116 s.f. addition, and 1,157 s.f. patio cover
• allow 3,400 s.f. aggregate additional building space for storage and kitchen (as approved
previously).
b. Site development to conform to Narrative Plan, Titled SUP for Superstition Manor, 8 (eight) pages
revised May 22, 2015 and stamped received May 22, 2015.
h. I think 11:00 pm is too late in the evening; disturbance to adjacent residents could be the result.
i. Maximum of 250 attendees, staff included.
j. Security and attendants required any time 150 people exceeded. I am not sure how anybody could
schedule this.
in. Recycled asphalt conforming to air quality standards. This is OK. Spaces to be marked. Off-site
parking allowed but in non-residential areas and only if valet or shuttle service is available. Parking lot
must conform to standards.
q. Expiration date of Mar 27, 2015 indicated.
t. Non-compliance with recommendations shall be treated as a violation.
u. Environmental Service, Transportation, Drainage required after approval (if approved).
v. SUP subject to revocation prior to expiration if conditions not met. Will expire Mar 27, 2015, this SUP is
only temporary.
w. Control will be necessary. Right turn on Signal Butte only and no ingress/egress onto Brown Road. This
will protect those residents (RU-43) south of Brown Road from all of the pollution created by the
entering and exiting vehicles.
x. Points 1 thru 3 of the "x" stipulation are very confusing; it refers to MCESD having possibly to apply the
requirements of septic permitting for the expansion of the new building of 6,000 s.f and the 5,000 s.f.
warehouse. There may be a conflict between this stipulation and stipulation (a).
Conclusions:
4
Considering the points under Item 27 (Staff recommendations) including that Staff recommends the
Commission motion of denial of the request as filed and that the vast majority of requirements will be as
dictated by the various Codes, I think the recommendations should be looked at and rewritten as needed to
eliminate confusion and conflicts.
Furthermore, I do not think approval, even with conditions, addresses the problem of allowing an obvious 6+
acre commercial venture to take place within a rural area.
Recommendation: 1,Z Denial El Approval I Other
Sincerely,
Paul H. McAllister
5
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Donald Dahler <dp.dahler@q.com >
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:34 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Debra Stark - PLAN DEVX
Cc: Steve Chucri - DIST2X; Page Gonzales - DIST2X; Mike Cook; annfar@gmail.com ; Jennifer;
"Judith Schmier"; Ronald & Barbara Krainz
Subject: Superstition Manor Case Z2014012 opposition petitions
Attachments: PetitionPg1 TurlyRochaNewelLpdf; SSM petitionListSorted byParcel
no.1NoADDRorPhone.xls
Ladies and gentlemen,
I have attached the first page of the opposition petition form showing the signatures of Mr. and Mrs. Turley, Can Rocha and Aaron
I have attached the document as proof that they signed the opposition petition and apparently changed their minds within the
last couple of weeks and neglected to notify me. Please remove Howard Turley, Tiffani Turley, Can Rocha and Aaron Newell from the
opposition petition forms.
The second attached document is the revised opposition signatures by parcel number eliminating Howard and Tiffani Turley and Can
Rocha. Aaron Newell was not in the original list.
Revised residents opposed that own parcels within 300 feet per the assessor's records,
Rodney, Randall and Kathleen Flinn Parcel # 220-04-015
Rodney, Randall and Kathleen Flinn Parcel # 220-04-016A
Bob and Pam Moody - Parcel # 220-04-013E
Blake and Jennifer Clarkson Parcel # 220-04-014P
Per the assessor records that leaves four (4) parcels within the 300 foot buffer opposed to the expansion of Superstition Manor Case
Z2014012.
If anyone wants their name removed from the opposition documents all they have to do is contact me and I will remove
them from the opposition documents and notify Planning, thank you.
Sincerely,
Donald Dahler
Group Leader
East Valley Property Rights Coalition
480 984-8061
1
AREA. SUP. PEITIT05-2
IS
PROPERTY. FURTHER THE AND
Z2014012. LIGHTING, IN APPROVED
Z2012086 WILL RIDING AREA ,,,,,,,kli t_ 114
# # R1-35 THE THE SIGNATURE dx...-- --e-.46e.e_orL5-zz--r-f-;--esa7
CASE CASE POLLUTION, PROPERTY BIKE OF TO Irktel(A,LT-20gki-- 6-1 ,______6(1,do,..,, v.— 7,
& .'
MISC. RESIDENTIAL AIR THE HORSE TRANQUILITY CONDITIONS / / iii 60, A
MANOR & & OF I 1 ,..-- I 1 i
the NOISE USE SAFE AND NO. NO. A' # 01Y 14.4-2. 171-7 P ' 3..v i 6-01.9.4 iiiimiiImoMMINg"1"--- 610Fe- P
PARKING on STRICTER OV- 9-- o9-p13 0 0.1-1- 19--e05-g AO-)3-005P
SUPERSTITION CONGESTION, INCREASED PROHIBIT Supervisor: Councilman: PAHLEL PHONE 2W-04---01 - ;-,2.0 y 1(9- 215:-.1147- :Irze- A-20-- :42,0- g..2Q-1.3, RIO-TY-0C
FOR ADDITIONS NOT PEACEFULNESS ADD & ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: pa: ph: pa: pa: ph: pa: ph' • ph: ka: ph: ph: pa: pT pa: ph: pa: ph:
WEST & IF
FOR TRAFFIC PROPOSED HINDER THE UNCHANGED
permit THE BUILDING
TO THE WILL SUPPORTS
use INCREASES: KILL IT REMAIN
ACRES and AND
special IT ROAD AND SHALL (Print
2.5 AS & AREA ONLY
CONDITIONS SUP THE SITE ADDRESS •
APPROVED ADJACENT THE DRIVERS OF USE SUP e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: .-:. - e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail:
--
SUP TO DRUNK R1-3.5
THE THE the TRANQUILITY RESIDENTIAL .
of OPPOSED
TO OF POTENIAL FOR RESIDENTIAL
ARE AND
CHANGES ADDITION RELAXATION ALLOWS Representative: Representative: 7 :7- - /-
BELOW ROADS, THE
ANY THE ON PEACEFULNESS ZONING HERE. Area: / exu r A 6„,-._ --0-s14\71 (INV 4.Jt6V ,t,
any SIGNED Mesa: (Print) 4, 06G\ 5,1,u.-irer
OPPOSE DEBRIS THE BOUGHT County Area: of -1-(41k-tij i Azir-et skE\ Mc
OPPOSE OPPOSE PARTIES & PRESENT WE City City NAME +60112- n. Si ;,:c •k, 0\ TA .. ,::3',
WE AND WE THE LITTER DISRUPT THE WHY Maricopa Mesa MAYOR TV-Fir,i"v( FICA,C;i 5L.7'1' KrLt' DAv el '1 .. ViiiiiieWerrir U\r A /14{Thrn\i Kebe CA (- ,•)0,561K
A
, s one.x
6-12-15 E-MAlL or
NAMES NJo no.1
97 [ NO. byParcel
PRESENT PARCEL 141-45-274 141-45-274 219-49-457 219-49-457 220-01-001U 220-01-001U 220-01-001U 220-01-001V 220-01-001X 220-01-001X 220-01-019E 220-01-019E 220-01-019E 220-01-019E 220-01-001X 220-02-011b 220-02-011b 220-02-032A 220-02-032A 220-03-014A 220-03-014A 220-03-014A 220-03-014J 220-03-014J 220-03-014J 220-04-005H 220-04-005H 220-04-005H 220-04-005M 220-04-005M 220-04-005M petitionListSorted
AT SSM
NO.
PHONE
I
Z2014-012 0
SUP ADDRESS age
BY (Print)
CENTER SIGNERS ADDRESS
EVENT -
MANOR OPPOSED
SUPERSTITION PETITION (Renter) (Renter) (Renter) (Renter) (Renter) (Renter)
(Print) NAME MOODY ANDREW ANDREW POWELL SCHMITZ SCHMITZ MARTIN SCHMIER SCHMIER SCHMIER SCHMIER KENNEDY KENNEDY KENNEDY KENNEDY KENNEDY KENNEDY KENNEDY KENNEDY KENNEDY KENNEDY KENNEDY PM 3:06
MOODY SMITH RUBANOW SCHMITZ RUDHAM YEARICK MARTIN SCHMITZ H. E. H. E. KIRK KIRK (JAMES) KENNEDY 06/1812015
ROBERT PAM SCOTT KRISTEN JORANI JOE BRANDON MATTHEW MATTHEW ADAM ED LISA ANTHONY RILEY EVAN JUDITH SCOTT JUDITH SCOTT JAMES JEANNE KELLY JAMES JEANNE KELLY JEANNE KIRK KELLY JEANNE KIRK KELLY
---" one.xs or
6-12-15 E-MAIL — No
NAMES • byparceLno.i
97 I NO rted
PRESENT PARCEL 220-04-0065 220-04-0065 220-04-006S 220-04-006S 220-04-006U 220-04-006U 220-04-0070 220-04-0070 220-04-007F 220-04-007F 220-04-007L 220-04-007L 220-04-008N 220-04-008N 220-04-010G 220-04-010G 220-04-010H 220-04-010H 220-04-010P 220-04-01OP 220-04-010V 220-04-010V 220-04-010Z 220-04-010Z 220-04-013C 220-04-013C 220-04-013D 220-04-0130 220-04-013E 220-04-013E 220-04-015 petitionListso
AT 1
NO.
PHONE
I
Z2014-012 _ . ,_ 0 z
SUP ADDRESS _. age
BY (Print)
CENTER SIGNERS ADDRESS
EVENT -
MANOR OPPOSED
SUPERSTITION PETITION
(Print) NORSTROM-FARENCE 3:06
NAME GOSSLING GOSSLING REEVES REEVES BREINHOLT BREINHOLT GOODMAN GOODMAN DRAPER GUTHRIE GUTHRIE WAX WAX RUBANOW RUBANOW ANDERSON ANDERSON GLEAVES GLEAVES GROSSMAN GROSSMAN HOSKIN HOSKIN FARENCE MCGEE MCGEE MOODY MOODY FLINN 06/1812015
BROOKE JUSTIN PREEDA MICHAEL BRADY BROOKE BETH SONNY DEA DRAPER ED ERIN DALLAS COREEN NATHAN MARK RACHEL ROSA CHRIS HUGH JEAN MARTIN FELICITY ISABEL ROB A. JOHN ROSANNE DAVE NATALIE PAMELA ROBERT RODNEY
.
6-12-16 E-MAIL _. NoAOLJXorhIione.xIs
NAMES no1
97 I byParce
PRESENT NO. PARCEL 220-04-015 220-04-015 220-04-016A 220-04-016A 220-04-016A 220-04-018 220-04-018 220-07-003B 220-07-003B 220-07-003C 220-07-003C 220-07-009C 220-07-009C 220-04-014P 220-04-014P 220-07-018F 220-07-018F 220-07-026F 220-07-026F 220-08-029L 220-08-029M 220-08-029N 220-13-005B 220-13-005B 220-13-005C 220-13-005C 220-13-005E 220-13-0050 220-13-005D 220-13-0160 220-13-0160 itonListSorted
AT I pet [VI S
NO.
PHONE
I
Z2014-012 .. 0 .5
SUP ADDRESS _ age
BY (Print)
CENTER SIGNERS ADDRESS
EVENT -
MANOR OPPOSED
SUPERSTITION PETITION cell cell cell
(Print) PM 3:06
NAME FLINN FLINN FLINN FLINN FLINN DAHLER LER TERRELL RECUPERO KRAINZ NZ KRAI CLARKSON CLARKSON ADAMS AYOTTE AYOTTE CLARK CLARK CLARK GONZALEZ GONZALEZ SQUIRES SQUIRES ANDERSON LAWLOR LAWLOR 0611812015
RANDALL !KATHLEEN RODNEY RANDALL KATHLEEN RYAN JEFF RYAN MARY DONALD DAH POK LOUISE MICHAEL RONALD BARBARA BLAKE JENNIFER GREG ADAMS KIM KARREN LARRY CAMILLE CAMILLE CAMILLE LAURA ANTHONY REBECCA CARL HEATHER JASON NATALIE HOOD TIM HOOD JUDY
6-12-15 E-MAIL no.1NoADDRorPhone.xis
NAMES
97 I byParcel
PRESENT NO PARCEL 220-13-026B 220-13-026B 220-13-034 309-02-370 petitionListSorted
AT SSM
NO.
PHONE
Z2014-012 4 of
ADDRESS 4 Page
SUP
BY (Print)
CENTER
SIGNERS ADDRESS
EVENT -
MANOR OPPOSED
SUPERSTITION PETITION
(Print) PM
3:06
NAME OLCOTT OLCOTT BAKER HENDERSON 06/18/2015
H.
JOHN JOAN JONNA ALICE
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Bob and Pam <rayraemoody@msn.com >
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 8:00 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Subject: Superstition Case # Z2014012 Parcel SUP 220-04-014W
RE: Opposition to SUP Parcel 220-04-014W
Requested by: John Burns
1220 N Signal Butte Rd.
Mesa, AZ 85207
My wife and I purchased lot # 220-04-013E in Scarface a few years ago with hopes of building a home free of
the usual neighborhood congestion.
We were very alarmed and surprised when Superstition Manor was built and now is trying to expand another
four acres per SUP 220-04-014W.
We have halted our plans to build due to the location of the expansion request related to our lot #220-04-
013E. Unfortunately if we do not build as planned we are stuck with a piece of property that will be difficult to
sell due to Superstition Manor.
Voting in favor of the expansion magnifies all negative reasons not desirable in a residential area.
Robert and Pamela Moody
1642 N. 59th Street
Mesa, AZ. 85205
Parcel #220-04-013E
1
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: AZRon <azrjk40@gmail.com >
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:12 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLAN DEVX
Cc: Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor NEW SUP REQUEST Case # Z2014012
Importance: High
To: Raymond Banker and the Maricopa County
Commissioners,
My spouse and I are against any revisions to the original
approved SUP and any expansion of Superstition Manor as
proposed in Case # Z2014012. The original SUP is to remain
unchanged with no expansion of land.
We were against the issuance of the original Special Use
Permit last year.
We now need to question Mr. Burns' real intention for that
land. Few events have happened since he opened the facility.
This is setting an unnecessary precedent that will ultimately
allow others to skirt the original intent of land use.
Sincerely yours,
Ronald and Barbara Krainz
1027 N Signal Butte Rd
Mesa, AZ 85207
(480) 288-2797
App-j:020-ot 001 c
1
Below,
I have attached my original e mail to you discussing the event center, Superstition Manor. Our opinion of
the project, and proposed changes has not changed. We would prefer for the neighborhood to stay
residential, with no businesses. Since the original SUP was granted for Superstition Manor, we would
prefer that the business not be allowed to expand, and interfere with the lives of the people that have
lived here for years. We just don't want to have to deal with increased traffic, noise, music, light, etc.
I agree that we all have the right to have a business and make a living. But, we all need to consider the
impact these changes will have on our lives.
Thanks
Louise Terrell
Michael Recupero
On Friday, March 21, 2014 3:39 PM, Louise Terrell <esmereldaw2002(&yahoo.com > wrote:
To: planning board, Maricopa County
From: Louise Terrell
Michael Recupero
1107 N 109th St
Mesa, AZ 85207
480-332-1889
Parcel # 220-07-003C 7
Subject: SUP Z2014012, Superstition Manor
We have lived at the above address for 10 years. We chose this house & property for the location, among
other details. We wanted to live in a rural desert community, & have "horse property", In the vicinity,
many of our neighbors have horses, and ride along the roads in this community. This area is very quiet &
peaceful. We respect our neighbors , the desert, & the wildlife. We enjoy star gazing, as well. We want to
live in a residential area, free of businesses. When we moved here, there were no businesses, and none
being allowed to develop.
We originally opposed the SUP to allow Superstition Manor to exist as a event center. The overwhelming
majority of the community opposed the event center. Only a very small number of neighbors voiced their
OK for the project. Unfortunately, the planning board voted to allow Superstition Manor the SUP. Since the
vote, Superstition Manor has expanded continuously. We all objected to the original size of the event
center. Now, the event center is much larger, & can hold even larger events. So, my guess is that they
purchased the additional property to either expand further, or make a very large parking lot? My husband
& I were unhappy with the original size of Superstition Manor. Now, we are even more outraged with the
business, and what it will do to our neighborhood, 8c property value! We want our neighborhood to stay a
residential community. We don't want any businesses-in our neighborhood.
Our concern for the expansion of Superstition Manor is amplified from the original SUP last year.
This is a rural desert community. We moved here because we wanted the peace & quiet, to enjoy the
desert & wildlife. With an event center, comes increased traffic, increased noise pollution, increased light
pollution, increased air pollution. At events, will there be alcohol? If so, there will be an increased
possibility of drunk driving & accidents, With an increase of traffic, the wildlife that comes near the road
will be in an increased danger of being hit & killed. All of the bikers & horseback riders are also at a higher
risk of being hit or killed by event attendees. Increasing the size of Superstition Manor and adding a large
parking lot will add considerable traffic to the community.
In a democracy, the will of the people decides what will happen. The community overwhelmingly spoke
last time - we wanted our community to stay residential. My husband & I are speaking again. We don't
2
want Superstition Manor to be in our community. We don't want them to continue to expand.
We oppose any business in this residential community. We opposed Superstition Manor. WE OPPOSE THE
NEW SUP. PLEASE SAY NO TO THE AMENDMENT TO SUP # Z2014012
Louise Terrell
Michael Recupero
3
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Natalie McGee <natalierncgee@live.com >
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 12:09 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard PLANDEVX; Natalie McGee
Subject: Case #Z2014012
To: Raymond Banker and M. Darren Gerard:
Please add us to your mailing list for all notifications, reports, and/or notices for the Superstition
Manor Amendment to the SUP Case #Z2014012. Please count this email as our statement of
opposition to the proposed expansion SUP for the property on Signal Butte and Brown.
From: Dave and Natalie McGee
480.986.9885
10730 E. Gary Lane
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel # 220-04-013D 9
RE: Superstition Manor Case # Z2014012 — Northwest Corner of Signal Butte & Brown Roads.
1
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Laura <alhgonzalez@gmaiLcom>
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 11:18 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLAN DEVX
Cc: Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject: Case # Z2014012
Anthony Gonzalez & Laura Gonzalez
1148 N. 106th Place
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel # 220-13-005B
Phone: 480-643-0295
To: Raymond Banker
Re: Superstition Manor - Case # Z2014012 —North West Corner Signal Butte & Brown Roads.
My spouse and I are opposed to the REQUEST AMENDMENT TO SUP, CHANGE STIPULATION & ADD 4
ACRES, NORTH WEST CORNER SIGNAL BUTTE & BROWN ROADS, SIZE 7 ACRES CASE #
Z2014012.
We oppose the requested SUP that will more than double the size of the acreage covered by the original SUP,
that placed a commercial business on the residential zoned R1-35 property, for the following reasons:
Increased vehicle traffic and congestion
1. Daily from four (4) to five (5) employee vehicles
2. During preparation for events
3. During actual events — currently allowed 120 vehicles to a potential of over 360 guest vehicles plus
employees and security vehicles.
Increased vehicle noise and air pollution from additional vehicle traffic that would not exist were it not for this
commercial facility.
Increased traffic will increase the litter and debris on our roads — we already get to much litter on our roads.
Increased traffic will increase the potential for more drunk drivers on our roads (According to Mr. Burns and
Mr. Lake (at the meeting on the original SUP) we already get drunk drivers from the horse arena).
Increased lighting from an expanded parking area and/or facilities — a large parking lot in a residential
neighborhood?
Increased traffic will increase road kill of our precious wild life.
Increased traffic will increase the potential for vehicular accidents that could be fatal.
Increased traffic with increase the risk of children being struck as they walk to and from bus stops and friends
homes.
The proposed expansion of the property will:
1. Disrupt the peacefulness and tranquility of the area
2. Hinder (if not prohibit)
A. Safe horse riding
B. Safe bike riding
C. Safe walking
An SUP was designed for the use of small family run cottage businesses not a major commercial facility such as
Superstition Manor.
The present zoning on the four (4) acres adjacent to Superstition Manor is to remain residential R1-35 with NO
SPECIAL USE PERMIT.
The present zoning supports the peacefulness and tranquility of the area and is why we bought here.
It would have been helpful if the facility had been designed to blend in with the rest of the community — IT
DOES NOT
2
Sincerely yours,
Anthony & Laura Gonzalez
Sent from my iPhone
3
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Joan Olcott <azcowponies@rnsn.com >
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 9:09 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor
John & Joan Olcott
10718 E. Fenimore Road
Mesa, AZ 85207
480-986-8316
azcowponies • msn.com
Parcel#220-13-026B 8
To: Raymond Banker
Re: Superstition Manor - Case # Z2014012 — North West Corner Signal Butte & Brown Roads.
This is to inform you that we are opposed to the request Amendment to the SUP, making changes to stipulations and adding 4
additional acres.
• the agreement met back in March 2013 stated there would be no further additions or changes made. This is untrue, there has
been a large addition added in the past year.
• Extending the hours of operation would only disrupt the neighborhood more than it already has. There is loud music (which
only suppose to be inside) people yelling.
Please deny the additional 4 hours of music and deny outside music other than the wedding march.
• the maximum guest limit should not be increased to 400, the limit Was set at 250.
• You have read the other letters opposing and we would agree with them.
Again why would this gentleman do this huge addition and already clear the site for the purposed parking lot if he did not believe he
already knew this would be passed.
My question is have you already made your decision in favor of Superstition Manor.
Over 300+ residents signed a petition perviously and the County Board could care less.
Does anyone keep their word? We ask that you may do diligent investigation and thought into your decisions.
Thank you,
John H. & Joan E. Olcott
1
Raymond Banker - PLAN DEVX
From: Joseph Rubanow <structural-az@msn.com >
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 2:35 PM
To: Donald Dahler; Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Cc: dovefeather01
Subject: RE: Superstition Manor - NEW SUP REQUEST Case # Z2014012
To Raymond Banker and the distinguished Maricopa Board members, SUP Case #Z2014012
4-19-2014
My family and I are still opposed to the existence and the expansion of the Superstition Manor Event Center
located at the North West corner of Signal Butte Rd and Brown Rd.
My family and I have witnessed trash on our side road Signal Butte and Hillview St- directly across from our
home on the East side in the dirt.., two red plastic cups and napkins, Speeding cars heading North past our
home past Hillview St.
An accident occured while an event was going on approx. 80 feet west of Signal Butte Rd, and last night,
Friday April 18, 2014 at approx. 10:30 pm a person was arrested on the corner of Signal Butte Rd and Jensen
Rd.
As in the past our neighborhood (400 people plus) predicted correctly, the reality of having a PARTY HOUSE on
our corner. This has caused havoc to the community and our peaceful tranquil neighborhood.
There's something wrong with having Police with there lights on arresting people for DWI, speeding etc which
is fueled by this party house.
Mr. Burns has violated many of the County's rules and approval guidelines along the way giving no
consideration to obtaining permits at the proper time prior to starting work.
Mr Burns and his family do not reside at this property. His application originally proposed this to be an
owner occupied Business and residence.
He has raised his outer walls beyond the height mentioned with the origination plans, added more exterior
lighting, he has built additional structures, removed all the desert landscaping on the property and on the
recently purchased property just West of the High End Party house.
This property which he intends to used as a parking lot also offers the possibility of constructing additional
building structures with amendments to his approvals as he has been know to do!
Currently there are dozens of dirt stock piles and debris. I was unable to locate on the internet any stock pile
permits, we have not seen any dust control efforts either.
Please acknowledge Mr Burns as a repeated offender to the entire community. He tries to walk over the
County regulations by simply paying fines then being allowed to have his approvals for what ever he desires.
The majority of the community are disputing the application and more and more residents are following suit
because of how this is developing. Most are still in the same frame of mind that Mr. Burns can do what ever
he wants because he has 'Deep pockets' as he has told me, Joe Rubanow, in the past. He has no regard for
following the rules and the County procedures.
Please do not approve this current application or any applications in the future and revoke his current license
due to breaching his agreement with the community and it's laws.
Please also include the BELOW objections along with our above letter.
Respectfully,
Joseph Rubanow Property Owner Parcel # 220-04-010 G
Mark Rubanow
Rachel Rubanow
Kim Maher
Natalie Mendicino
2
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Valerie Beckett - PLANDEVX
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 8:12 AM
To: Ellen Janowicz - PLANDEVX
Cc: Helen Boswell - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX; Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX;
Terri Hogan - PLANDEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor Opposition to Expansion Z2014021
Thank you Ellen - On-call Planning was the correct assignment for this inquiry.
I have copied the Planning team on this email to be sure they are aware of the input. I have closed this
ticket.
Valerie
From: RDSA-IT Fleipclesk [mailto:rdsaithelpdeskOmail,rnaricopa.gov ]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 8:05 AM
To: Valerie Beckett - PLANDEVX
Subject: Issue #61316, Next Action assigned w/note: FW: Case #Z2014012 (Planning and Development) As Next Action
A note on Next Action was added to the following Issue in IssueTrak:
Issue #: 61316
Subject: FW: Case #Z2014012
Status: Open
Division Type: Ombudsman
Priority: Medium
Project:
Division: PNDPIanning PND Planning
Organization: Planning and Development
Submitted By: External User, PND on 11-Apr-2014
Assigned To: CustomerService, PND on 11-Apr-2014
Next Action: Beckett, Valerie on 14-Apr-2014 602-506-3702
Issue Description:
Submitted by direct email to rdsaithelpdesk@mail.maricopa.gov .
From: PD ON CALL PLANNER[SMTP:PDPLANNER@MAILMARICOPA.GOV ]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 6:36:58 PM
To: pdcustomerservice
Subject: FW: Case #Z2014012
Auto forwarded by a Rule
From: Fredda[SMTP:REEVES135@YAHOO.COM ]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 6:36:55 PM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Subject: Case #Z2014012
Auto forwarded by a Rule
To whom it may concern,
We are writing in opposition regarding any further expansion of superstition manor site
at 10744 E Brown road, mesa az 85207. We live at 1324 N 104th PI in mesa just down
the road from the monstrosity called superstition manor.bit continues to grow and we
believe the traffic and noise will become even worse on an already extremely busy
street. There are many children who walk to and from the bus stop for school that have
to walk right in front of the facility twice a day. There is no sidewalk and there is much
traffic because of continuing construction and events and the parking lot is where there
have to walk. There is much fear that expansion could be terribly dangerous and a
terrible thing to happen to the neighborhood and desert. Please consider not allowing
any further development. Thank you
Michael and Fredda Reeves
4rt 0 1A - 0046
Sent from my 'Phone
Notes:
**Note by Janowicz, Ellen, 14-Apr-2014:
I WAS NOT SURE WHO THIS WOULD GO TO BUT THOUGHT YOU SHOULD KNOW
THANKS
2
Raymond Banker PLANDEVX
From: Ann <annfar@gmail.com ›
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 4:42 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor — Case # Z2014012 — Northwest Corner of Signal Butte & Brown
Roads,
To: Raymond Banker and M. Darren Gerard:
Please add us to your mailing list for all notifications reports, and/or notices for the Superstition
Manor Amendment to the SUP Case #Z2014012. Please count this email as our statement of
opposition to this requested Amendment.
From: Rosanne Norstrom-Farence & John Farence (Phone: (480) 357-7972)
10710 E. Gary Lane
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel # 220-04-013C
RE: Superstition Manor Case # Z2014012 — Northwest Corner of Signal Butte & Brown Roads.
We are very much opposed to the request for an Amendment to the SUP to change stipulation and
add 4 acres to the northwest corner of Signal Butte and Brown Roads, resulting in a total of 7 acres
for Superstition Manor, Case #Z2014012. We are requesting that this Amendment to the SUP be
denied.
We live directly north of the Superstition Manor house and the proposed 4 acre addition to the Special
Use Permit (SUP). We can see lights and hear noise from the front yard of our home during every
event. We have spent a good amount of time picking up plastic and paper trash that has blown into
our area after events. Additionally, we have been held up in traffic congestion from motorists going
into and out of the facility, when we were trying to go to or from our home.
Deny the Amendment to the SUP!
Agreements between Mr. Burns and his neighbors were made in good faith in March 2013 for the
approval of the Superstition Manor SUP. Mr. Burns made promises to his neighbors and his
neighbors compromised and made arduous concessions so that Mr. Burns could have his SUP. This
request for an Amendment to the SUP will cancel all compromises and promises made by Mr. Burns
to his neighbors in order to get approval for his SUP in March 2013. Therefore, this requested
Amendment for the SUP should be denied on all counts.
1. Mr. Burns' SUP was approved for reasonable hours 10:00 am to 9:00 pm Sunday through
Thursday and 8:00 am to 11:00 pm on Friday & Saturday.
Deny his request for extended hours Sunday through Thursday, holidays and school vacations.
There are people who work on holidays and school children who attend year-round
schools. Extending these hours will only serve to hurt these persons and is being inconsiderate and
thoughtless of their peace and quiet.
2. Mr, Burns agreed to outside amplified music only for the "wedding march" during the
wedding ceremony.
1
Deny his request for the addition of 4 hours of outside amplified music (2 hours before & 2 hours after
a ceremony).
Retain the agreed upon time for outside amplified music as stipulated in the approved SUP, it being
that outside amplified music is allowed only during the wedding ceremony. Suggestion: Add a time-
limit of one-half hour of outside amplified music during any event.
Deny his request to expand the hours for indoor amplified music. Retain the agreed upon time for
indoor amplified music as stipulated in the SUP, it being that no indoor amplified music extend past
the hours of 9:00 pm Sunday-Thrusday and 10:00 pm on Friday and Saturday.
3. Mr. Burns agreed to a maximum of 250 persons on the property for each event.
Deny his request for an increase in parking spaces and for an increase in the number of guests to
400 persons. Deny his request for the addition of acreage for additional parking spaces as this will
allow Mr. Burns to increase the number of vehicles and hence, increase the number of persons
attending each event.
4. Mr. Burns agreed to keep lights and noise at low levels so as to not disturb his
neighbors. This has not been the case. We are continually disturbed by every event he holds at
Superstition Manor.
Deny his request to allow this already disturbing commercial event facility to become an even bigger,
more disturbing, noisier and more flamboyant commercial business.
5. Mr. Burns agreed to live in the home where his for-profit party business is conducted.
His home is supposed to be a residence with a SUP to operate a small cottage industry out of his
home. If approved, the requested Amendment to the SUP would sanction Mr. Burns single family
residence to function as a full-blown commercial business and not as a residence with a SUP. This
is especially true if the Burns family moves out of their current Superstition Manor house, as they are
proposing to do, and instead resides in a new home on the adjacent acreage. This is not the purpose
of a SUP!
* Deny Mr. Burns' request to add additional acreage to the existing Superstition Manor home for the
purpose of building a separate residence to live in.
* Deny Mr. Burns the approval to live in a separate residence while using the SUP for the Superstition
Manor home.
* Deny Mr. Burns the opportunity to turn his SUP for a residence into an even larger major
commercial enterprise,
6. Mr. Burns agreed to a 10-year SUP.
Deny Mr. Burns' request to change his SUP to 20 years.
The 10-year limit was set to protect the neighbors and community should he not comply with
agreements he made in conducting his Superstition Manor business, Ten (10) years gives him
sufficient time to prove himself and to allow the neighborhood and community to observe and report
on his compliance or non-compliance. In our opinion, 10 years is too long of a time period and 20
years is certainly asking way too much of the neighborhood and community.
7. Mr. Burns stated in his narrative report, approved by the Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors on March 27,2013, that "No other expansions of the property are proposed!' He
has since expanded his event facility to 20,000 square feet, adding a 10,000 square foot addition to
his home.
Deny Mr, Burns request to further expand Superstition Manor. Enough is enough!
2
What has transpired since the approval of the initial SUP:
As feared, the event traffic adds noise, lights, air pollution, congestion and litter to what used to be
our quiet, peaceful, and clean neighborhood. There is an ostentatious display of lights on the
Superstition Manor house and in the parking lot during evening events. When lit up during an event,
the house and parking lot lights are so bright and flashy that they present a serious distraction
to motorists on Brown Road who are approaching the intersection. Adding more acreage for more
parking and more people will exacerbate these already serious problems.
Greed by One Residence for More and More. A Need by the Community for the County to Set
Limits:
Upon gaining the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors approval for his original SUP, Mr. Burns
agreed to limit the number of parking lot lights and number of guests that would be attending
events. He also agreed to keep all amplified music indoors except for the "wedding march" song
during a wedding. He also agreed to parties ending at 9:00 pm on weekdays and by 11:00 pm on
weekends. The proposed Amendment to his SUP will give him carte blanche to break his promises
and ignore the compromises he initially made to the community in order to obtain his original
SUP. This request for adding more acres to his facility to accommodate more parking and larger
groups of people will also bring more lights, more noise, more litter, more traffic, more air pollution,
and more intoxicated drivers to our neighborhood, making an already annoying facility more
intolerable than it already is.
The Community and Neighborhood Compromised and Gave Up A Lot for Mr. Burns to Have
his SUP:
As his neighbors, we gave up a lot of peace and quiet and enjoyable solitude so that Mr. Burns could
have his SUP to use his house as a commercial event facility. Now it appears that we didn't give
enough, because he is not happy with what he agreed to and the promises he made to his neighbors;
he wants more and more.
This request for an Amendment to the SUP is an intransigent attitude by a person who will never be
satisfied with what he already has. This request for an Amendment to the SUP breaks every promise
that was made to the people in this neighborhood where the event facility is located.
The proposed Amendment to the SUP is an insult to the persons in this area that compromised with
Mr. Burns so he could use his home as a commercial business. The proposal to amend the SUP in
order to increase everything that we previously had agreed upon as reasonable, shows greed as well
as a total lack of consideration and a flagrant disregard for the people living here in this area. What
good are agreements and promises made if they can't be kept?
There is an old adage that applies here, "Give them an inch and they'll take a mile." Or simply put,
"Make a small concession and they'll take advantage of you." Mr. Burns is clearly taking advantage
of his neighbors and the County. He has no regard for what the people in his neighborhood and
community want or need.
So we have to wonder, why aren't the interests and rights of persons living in this community being
protected? Why is so much consideration being given to one while many go unnoticed and
unheard? What about considering the needs and wishes of people and their families who value
peace and tranquility and who moved to this specific area expecting to be protected by the residential
zoning? When will the citizens living in this neighborhood be given equal respect?
As Commissioners you have the power to protect our citizen rights. Please do that now by denying
this Amendment to the SUP.
3
,
,
The Amendment to the SUP should be denied.
Thank you for giving this your careful, thoughfful and serious consideration.
Regards,
John Farence & Rosanne Norstrom-Farence
10710 E. Gary Lane
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel # 220-04-013C
480 357-7972
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Judy Hood <judytimh@gmail.com >
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 2:36 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX; darrengerard@mail.maricop.gov
Cc: Donald Dahler
Subject: Special Use Permit # Z2014012
Attachments: HPIM1278.JPG; HPIM1275.JPG; HP1M1274.JPG
Dear County Planner, 4/10/14
I am sending this email in reference to the Special Use Permit # Z2014012 that is up for approval.
This permit would enable Mr. Burns to enlarge his business; a business he says is NOT a commercial
business.
You approved a Special Use Permit last year allowing him to open a wedding venue that would be in
hisi "home", which at the time did in fact look like an average sized house for this area.
You should see this "home" now. It now has the appearance of a small hotel, at least tripled in size
since the first permit was approved. Pictures enclosed.
This area is in a Protected Upland Sonoran Desert Area. It is zoned R43, rural agricultural with single
family homes on 1 acre or larger lots and with horses and other farm animals. Most families have
horses and use Signal Butte Road as their access to Usery Park. Signal Butte Road is also a main
"trail" for hikers and bicyclists. There is no signage indicating such.
The residents of this area moved here for the dark night skies, quiet Upland Desert landscape, and
low traffic. And yes, we knew the area surrounding us would grow and bring more traffic, but it would
be traffic from homes, not businesses. It's a residential area, right? There are a few businesses run
from homes here. Not One of them has ever had more than a few cars in their driveways at any one
time. When you drive by the homes, you see a single family home like most of the
neighborhood. Superstition Manor can NOT claim the same. 50 or more cars daily, seven days a
week, morning and evening, times when the neighborhood is most active with the outdoor activities of
riding, hiking and biking. Traffic from this venue will make these activities even more dangerous along
Signal Butte and Brown Roads.
Superstition Manor acreage was plowed, and all native plants and animals were annihilated not
protected. The plants were replaced with non native species that require, in most cases, many
gallons of water daily. This is the desert. Water is at a premium. All native plants and trees on at
1
least 2 of the new 4 acre parcel he wants to use as a parking lot have been destroyed, not
protected. On the narrative report I was given, he shows the far southwest corner of the 4 acres will
be for his residence. So that makes the original "home" a venue for a Commercial business.
Lastly, at the first hearing, he painted this facility to be a small, family run business. The "home" now
has restroom facilities for 400 people, a ballroom and already has parking for 250 cars. He wants to
expand parking so he can have 400 people on his property. This is NOT a small, family business.
This is a commercial business in a residential neighborhood. He was even complaining he couldn't
get a commercial loan after he denied vehemently that it wasn't a commercial business.
The traffic and noise is bad enough as it is. Expanding this FACILITY (hey, if it walks like a duck and
talks like a duck) is madness and wrong-minded. Please do not grant another Special Use Permit to
this facility. Please stop this!
Thank you,
Tim and Judy Hood
10620 E. Fenimore Rd.
Mesa, Arizona 85207
Parcel ID 220-13-016D
2
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Judith Schmier <cdnjudi@hotmaiLcom>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 8:18 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLAN DEVX
Cc: Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor-Case #Z2014012
Judith H Schmier
10344 E Jensen Street
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel #220-02-032A
Phone: 480-986-4290
Dear Mr. Banker: I am writing to inform you of my opposition to the Request Amendment to SUP, #Z2014012-
-"change stipulation & add 4 acres, north west corner Signal Butte & Brown Roads, size 7 acres."
First of all I have a couple of questions I would like answered. When Mr. Burns requested the original SUP
#Z2012-086, he stated, not only that he would be living in the building making it a home business, but that the
parcel was a total of 2.8 acres. He informed me that he plans to use part of the 4 acres as a parking lot and
also plans to build a home for himself on the back part. That means that he will no longer be able to say that
he is running a business out of his home, Also, in checking the Maricopa County website I discovered the Mr.
Burns split the original parcel #220-04-014S in 2011 into 3 parcels-220-04-014-V, 220-04-014-T and 220-04-
014-U. By splitting the parcel and having Superstition Manor sitting on one acre how can the building be able
to meet the required setbacks? Years ago my husband and I bought a 1 1/4 acre parcel, unfortunately it was
under two parcel numbers-1 acre and 1/4 acre. We were told that we had to combine both parcels in order to
build, which we did. Should he not be held to the same requirements as the rest of us?
Listed below are my reasons for opposition of the SUP:
Increased traffic causing congestion and pollution
Increased traffic causing possible death to wildlife and possible vehicular accidents
Increased lighting from the larger parking area that will cause light pollution
Increased traffic leads to the potential harm to children getting on and off the school bus, riders and people
walking.
Since Superstition Manor allows liquor to be served we also run the risk of more drunk drivers on our streets.
My husband and I have lived in this area for 30 years, first as renters and then as homeowners. We moved
here to enjoy the peace and quiet of the area, as well as the variety of wildlife available. We like to be able to
ride in the park or walk our dogs without worrying about the traffic and that will end with such a large facility
in our area. I am aware that change is going to happen. In the years I have lived here I have seen, as the older
residents have passed away, their land has been sold and split. Although I hate to see these changes the new
owners are building homes, not businesses! Mr. Burns keeps referring to planned communities with this type
of facility buti have been unable to convince him that if I wanted that type of facility in my neighborhood I
would have moved there! Mr. Burns also claims that such a facility will benefit our areal As far as I can see he
is the only one to benefit from it. The county is not even benefiting as he is not paying property taxes on the
entire acreage that he claims is for Superstition Manor, nor is he paying commercial taxes, which he seems to
be trying to avoid!
1
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Donald Dabler <dp.dahler@q.com >
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 6:04 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLAN DEVX
Cc: Darren Gerard - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor - NEW SUP REQUEST Case # Z2014012
Donald Dahler & Pok Dahler
1115 N. 109th Street
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel # 220-07-003B
Phone: 480 984-8061
To: Raymond Banker
Re: Superstition Manor - Case # Z2014012 — North West Corner Signal Butte & Brown Roads.
My spouse and I are opposed to the REQUEST AMENDMENT TO SUP, CHANGE STIPULATION & ADD 4 ACRES, NORTH WEST
CORNER SIGNAL BUTTE & BROWN ROADS, SIZE 7 ACRES CASE # Z2014012.
We oppose the requested SUP that will more than double the size of the acreage covered by the original SUP, that placed a
commercial business on the residential zoned R1-35 property, for the following reasons:
Increased vehicle traffic and congestion
1. Daily from four (4) to five (5) employee vehicles
2. During preparation for events
3. During actual events — currently allowed 120 vehicles to a potential of over 360 guest vehicles plus employees and security
vehicles.
Increased vehicle noise and air pollution from additional vehicle traffic that would not exist were it riot for this commercial facility.
Increased traffic will increase the litter and debris on our roads — we already get to much litter on our roads.
Increased traffic will increase the potential for more drunk drivers on our roads (According to Mr. Burns and Mr. Lake (at the meeting on
the original SUP) we already get drunk drivers from the horse arena).
Increased lighting from an expanded parking area and/or facilities — a large parking lot in a residential neighborhood?
Increased traffic will increase road kill of our precious wild life.
Increased traffic will increase the potential for vehicular accidents that could be fatal.
The proposed expansion of the property will:
1. Disrupt the peacefulness and tranquility of the area
2. Hinder (if not prohibit)
A. Safe horse riding
B. Safe bike riding
An SUP was designed for the use of small family run cottage businesses not a major commercial facility such as Superstition Manor.
The present zoning on the four (4) acres adjacent to Superstition Manor is to remain residential R1-35 with NO SPECIAL USE
PERMIT.
The present zoning supports the peacefulness and tranquility of the area and.is why we bought here.
It would have been helpful if the facility had been designed to blend in with the rest of the community — IT DOES NOT
Sincerely yours,
Donald and Pok Dahler
1
Page 1 of 2
IssueTrak # 59797
Welcome Banker, Raymund Log Out Issue #
IssueTr*,
Horne Main Menu
View Issue #59797
My IssueTrak email issue
Issue Detail
view
Add Note
Attachments Issue 59797
Next Action Last Name: CLARKSON
Edit First Name: BLAKE/ JENNIFER
Close Citizen Phone Number: 602-361-3476
Clone/Copy Information: Email Address: PDPLANNER@MAIL.MARICOPA.GOV
Submit Issue Permit #: 22014012 details
Search Issues
Organization: Planning and Development history
Lookup Issue #
Submitted By: External User, PND on 24-Mar-2014 10:31PM history
Knowledge Base
Division ID:
Projects Subject: FW: Opposition to case #Z2014012 SUP Superstition Manor
Reports
Custom Reports
Description: Submitted by direct email to rdsaithelpdesk@maiLmaricopa.gov .
Log Out
From: PD ON CALL PLANNER[SMTP:PDPLANNER@MAIL.MARICOPA.GOV]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 10:27:25 PM
To: pdcustomerservice
Subject: FW: Opposition to case #22014012 SUP Superstition Manor
Auto forwarded by a Rule
From: Jennifer[SMTP:JEN079@HOTMALL,COM]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 10:27:22 PM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Cc: Jennifer
Subject: Opposition to case #22014012 SUP Superstition Manor
Auto forwarded by a Rule
We are sending in this email to state our strong opposition to the amendment to
the Superstition Manor SUP Case # Z2014012 to add 4 acres on the West side.
Can you please include us on the list as residence which oppose the
amendment? Please contact us if you have any further questions.
Thank you,
Blake and Jennifer Clarkson
220-04-0149
10735 E. Giencove Street
Mesa, AZ 85207
602361.3476
Contact Type: Email
Division Type: Development Services
SubType 1: Planning
Subiype 2: Plan Amendments
SubType 3:
StitiType 4:
Assigned To: CustomerServ ce, PND on 24-Mar-2014 10:31PM details
Adj Time Open: 07:05
Total Time Open: 07:05
Issue Status: Cnc:— history
PriorIty:
kezpotisibiny
Next Action: Planning on 25- Mar-2014 10:39AM details
Supportilv into
http://rdsa-ithelpdesk.plandev.maricopa.gov/CSIssue Yiew.asp?IssueNbr=59797 03/25/2014
IssueTrak # 60186 Page 1 of 3
Welcome Banker, Raymond -77; Log Out issue
Home Main Menu
View Issue #60186
My IssueTrak email Issue
Issue Detail
View
Add Note
Attachments issue # 60186
Next Action Last Name: AYOTTE
Edit First Name: LARRY AND KARREN
Close Citizen Phone Number: 480-354-9605
Clone/Copy Information
Email Address: APLUSHORSES@Q.COM
Submit Issue Permit #: 12014012 details
Search Issues
Organization: Planning and Development history
Lookup Issue #
Knowledge Base Submitted By: External User PND on 28-Mar-2014 10:41AM history
Projects Division ID:
Subject: FW: New SUP 12014012 Superstition Manor
Reports
Custom Reports
Description:
Log Out Submitted by direct email to rdsaithelpdesk@mad.maricopa.gov .
From: CenturyLink Customer[SMTP:APLUSHORSES©Q.COM ]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 10:37:21 AM
To: pdcustomerservice
Cc: Donald DahlerVchrcris
Subject: New SUP Z2014012 Superstition Manor
Auto forwarded by a Rule
Attn: Mr. Ray Baker
Dear Sir,
I am e-mailing as a concerned resident near the property listed In "subject".
Larry and Karren Ayotte (owners)
10831 E Edgegrove St.
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel # 220-07-026F
Contact Phone: 480-354-9605
Upon reading the sign posted along Brown Road near Signal Butte
we understand that Mr. Burns, owner of Superstition Manor, is requesting
that the additional 4 acres that he has purchased be simply added to the SUP
originally acquired to facilitate legal operation of his Wedding & Event Center
on land still zoned for rural/residential use. At the time the original SUP was
imposed on our neighborhood, we were told that Mr. Burns would contain his
operation to the 3 acres which he was developing. Now that he has over
doubled
the size of his facility and installed a new septic system, he is lacking for parking
space, that he promised was sufficient for his patron demands at the board
meeting
that granted him his original SUP.
http://rdsa-ithelndesk.plaridev.marieopa.gov/CSIssue View.asp?IssueNbr=60186 03/28/2014
IssueTrak # 60186 Page 2 of 3
My husband & I oppose simply sweeping yet another 4 acres of rural/residential
land
under a grievously opposed previous SUP.
It seems that residential areas typically granted an SUP were designed to allow
for a
more cottage industry type of facility. This facility is (and was from the start) a
blatant
comrhercial enterprise with publicly acclaimed investors, geared for a much
broader
market than just the Wedding industry. If we, as neighbors, felt that the nature
of Mr.
Burns marketing was more family friendly Wedding Bakery included with
rentals
perhaps.. ..we might be a bit less apprehensive. However we have seen listings
for
Party type ventures, and Auto Shows, and events up to 3 times per day on
weekends,
with 500 participants. All these events include provisions for alcohol. This
service
leaves us with trepidations....will other controlled substances follow?. ..will some
events sanction escort services?
We have been a Rural Residential neighborhood. We were told that our area
was meant
to remain that way as our properties transition the way from higher densities
near Main St.
to our lovely desert uplands just north of this region.
Unimpeded expansion of one resident within a community is unfair
representation by our
Planning & Zoning agents within the total community.
I urge you to deny Mr. Burns the right to simply add an additional 4 acres to his
existing
SUP. We did not want a Wedding & Event Center here. We do not want an
additional
3 acres of parking with 1. acre undisclosed for Mr. Burn's personal use.
Thank you for entertaining my opinion,
Karren Ayotte
Contact Type: Email
Division Type: Development Services
SubType 1: Planning
SubType 2: Contact Staff
SubType
SubType 4:
Assigned To: CustomerService, PND on 28-Mar-2014 10:41AM details
Ad) Time Open: 03:47
Total Time Open: 03:47
Issue Status: Ofs history
. Priority:
kusponsibility
Next Action: Banker, Raymond on 28-Mar-2014 11:20AM 602-506-2364 details
Supporting Info
Notes
http://rdsa-ithelpdesk.plandev.marieopa.gov/CSIssueyiewasp?IssueNbr--60186 03/2812014
IssueTrak # 59672 Page 1 of 2
Welcome Banker, Raymond Ei Log Out Issue 4
Home Mein Menu
View Issue #59672
My IssueTrak email issue
Issue Detail
View
Add Note
Attachments Issue #: 59672
Edit Last Name: TERRELL ,
clone/ Copy First Name: LOUISE
Submit Issue Citizen Phone Number: NOT GIVEN
Search Issues Information: Email Address: esmereldaw2002@yahoo.com
Lookup Issue 4 Permit 4: Z2014012 details
Knowledge Base Organization: Planning and Development history
Projects Submitted By: External User, PND on 21-Mar-2014 3:50PM history
Reports Division ID:
Custom Reports Subject: FW: Z2014012
Log Out
Description:
Submitted by direct email to rdsaithelpdeskamaiLmaricopa.gov .
From: PD ON CALL PLANNER[SMTP:PDPLANNERPMAILMARICC)PA.GOV ]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 3:40:23 PM
To: pdcustomerservice
Subject: FW: Z2014012
Auto forwarded by a Rule
From: Louise Terrell[SMTP:ESMERELDAW2002@YA1-100.COM ]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 3:39:53 PM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER; dp.dahler@q.com
Subject: SUP: Z2014012
Auto forwarded by a Rule
To: planning board, Maricopa County
From: Louise Terrell
Michael Recupero
107 N 109th St
Mesa, AZ 85207
480-332-1889
Parcel # 220-07-003C 7
Subject: SUP Z2014012, Superstition Manor
We have lived at the above address for 10 years. We chose this house &. .
property for the location, among other details. We wanted to live in a rural
desert community, & have "horse property'. In the vicinity, many of our
neighbors have horses, and ride along the roads in this community. This area is
very quiet & peaceful. We respect our neighbors , the desert, & the wildlife.
We enjoy star gazing, as well. We want to live in a residential area, free of
businesses, When we moved here, there were no businesses, and none being
allowed to develop.
We originally opposed the SUP to allow Superstition Manor to exist as a event
center, The overwhelming majority of the community opposed the event
center. Only a very small number of neighbors voiced their OK for the project.
Unfortunately, the planning board voted to allow Superstition Manor the SUP.
Since the vote, Superstition Manor has expanded continuously. We all objected
to the original size of the event center. Now, the event center is much larger, &
can hold even larger events. So, my guess is that they purchased the additional
property to either expand further, or make a very large parking lot? My
husband & I were unhappy with the original size of Superstition Manor. Now, we
are even more outraged with the business, and what It will do to our
neighborhood, & property value! We want our neighborhood to sthy a
residential community. We don't want any businesses In our neighborhood.
http://rdsa-itheIpdesk.plandev.maricopa.gov/CSIssue View.asp?IssueNbr=59672 03/27/2014
IssueTrak # 59672 Page 2 of 2
Our concern for the expansion of Superstition Manor is amplified from the
original SUP last year.
This is a rural desert community. We moved here because we wanted the
peace & quiet, to enjoy the desert & wildlife. With an event center, comes
increased traffic, increased noise pollution, increased light pollution, increased
air pollution. At events, will there be alcohol? If so, there will be an increased
possibility of drunk driving & accidents. With an Increase of traffic, the wildlife
that comes near the road will be in an increased danger of being hit & killed. All
of the bikers & horseback riders are also at a higher risk of being hit or killed by
event attendees. Increasing the size of Superstition Manor and adding a large
parking lot will add considerable traffic to the community.
In a democracy, the will of the people decides what will happen. The
community overwhelmingly spoke last time - we wanted our community to stay
residential. My husband & I are speaking again. We don't want Superstition
Manor to be in our community. We don't want them to continue to expand.
We oppose any business in this residential community. We opposed
Superstition Manor. WE OPPOSE THE NEW SUP. PLEASE SAY NO TO THE
AMENDMENT TO SUP * Z2014012
Louise Terrell
Michael Recupero
Contact Type: Email
Division Type: Development Services
SubType 1: Planning
SubType 2: Support/Opposition for a Project
SubType 3:
SubType 4:
Assigned To: CustomerService, PND on 21-Mar-2014 3:50PM details
Ad] Time Open: 13:47
Close Date: 25-Mar-2014 9:37AM
Closed By: Banker, Raymond 602-506-2364
Total Time Open: 13:47
Issue Status: history
Priority:
Ritspnosibility
Next Action: Banker, Raymond on 21-Mar-2014 4:09PM 602-506-2364 details
Planning on 21-Mar-2014 3:58PM details
Solution: Customers opposition has been noted and a copy of the complaint has been filed
in case Z2014012. Applicant has been notified of this opposition.
SuppOrtino Info
Notes
Resolution Info
Task AssignedTo Completed Time
wyny.issuetrak.com
IssuuTrak 9.7 - 08-Feb-2012 - Cripyncht © 2001-2012 Issue-Irak: Inc.
htto://rdsa-ithelpdeskmiandev.maricopa.gov/CSIssue View.asp?IssueNbr=59672 03/27/2014
Page 1 of 2
JssueTrak # 59528
Welcome Freeman, James Log DU Issue If Ea
is;;;---TrIT40
Hume Main Menu
View Issue #5952.8
My IssueTrak - email issue
Issue Detail
view
Add Note
Attachments Issue : 59528
Next Action Last Name: ANDERSON
Edit First Name: CHRIS
Close Citizen Phone Number: 480-766-6434
Clone/copy Information: Email Address: chris@horizondevelop,com
Submit Issue Permit #: Z2014012 details
Search 'Issues Organization: Planning and Development history
lookup Issue Submitted By: External User, PND on 20-Mar-2014 8:41AM Nstory
Knowledge Base
Division ID:
Projects Subject: FM Superstition Manor property and rezone in Mesa
Reports
Custom Reports Description:
Log Out Submitted by direct email to rdsalthelpdeskOmail.maricopa.gov .
From: PD ON CALL PLANNER[SMTP:PDPLANNER@MAIL.MARICOPA.GOV ]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:40:20 AM
To; pdcustornerservice
Subject: FW: Superstition Manor property and rezone In Mesa
Auto forwarded by a Rule
From: Chris Anderson[SMTP:CHRIS@HORIZONDEVELOR.COM ]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:39:50 AM
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Cc: 'Donald Dahler'
Subject: Superstition Manor property and rezone In Mesa
Auto forwarded by a Rule
To whom it may concern:
Re: The Superstition Manor house, Case # Z2104012
I was involved In the recent opposition to the rezone on the manor house, It
involved some slick attorney work, moving the dates several times and creating
confusion,
The initial approval was approved with some MAJOR opposition, ON the final
approval, we had gathered our forces and although presenting hundreds of
voices in opposition,
this business was approved in our neighborhood.
Since his approval, he has built on, numerous times, adding additional sq.
footage in the thousands of feet. The spirit by which he was initially approved,
has been modified,
And he is looking to take it another level higher.
Count this email to the negative. No more building, no more parking lots, no
more decimated disturbance of the desert, no more invasion of our solitude and
lifestyle.
No more night lights, no more noise, no more parties, no more hundreds of cars
parked there, no more traffic, no more business in a residential neighborhood.
You guys screwed it up the first time, don't do it again. FYI, I live about 500
feet to the Northwest.
him. /iv ri en -i n de sk.nlandev.maric OD a.gov/CSIss-ue View.asp?IssueNbi- --59528 03/20/2014
Page 2 of 2
IssueTrak # 59528
Respectfully,
Chris Anderson
10645 E. Hillview St.
Mesa Az. 83207
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Anderson
Az. Investment Home Services
480-766-6434
chris©horizondevelop.com
Contact, -Cype.: Email
Division Type: Development Services
SubType 1: Code Enforcement
SubType 2; Complaint
Subtype
SubType 4:
Ats ,..:Ined To: CusternerService, PND on 20-Mar-2014 8:41AM detalis
Act Time Open: 04:15
Total Time Open: 0415
Issue adtus: histwy
Niority
Rw.iponsibility
Next Action: Code Enforcement on 20-Mar-2014 11:57AM details
Supp ratting TaKs
Motes v
Resolution info
Task Assigned-co Completed Time
www.issuetrak.com
Tssualrak 5.7 0-Feb-7D12 Copyn9tit 0) '2,001-201a
andev.maricopa.gov/CSIssue View.asp?IssueNbr=59528 03/20/2014
Mtn //n1 -11-1-1el -nclesk.n1
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Judith Schmier <cdnjudi@hotmail.com >
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 7:22 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Cc: Darren Gerard - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor-Case #Z2014012
Scott
E. Schmier
10344 E. Jensen Street
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel #220-02-032A
Phone: 480-986-4290
Dear Mr. Banker: I am writing to inform you of my opposition to the Request Amendment to SUP #Z2014012--
"change stipulation & add 4 acres, north west corner Signal Butte & Brown Roads, size] acres." First of all,
Mr. Burns stated that he plans to build his home on part of the 4 acres sometime in the future. Since he was
granted his existing SUP as a "home business" how can he possibly live in a separate building. My wife and I
have lived in this immediate area for over 30 years. When we first bought here we bought a way of life. We
wanted to enjoy the peace and quiet, listen to the wildlife and go riding or walking without worrying about our
safety. I realize that there is no stopping progress and I have no problem with people splitting land and more
people moving out here but most of them want what we want and that is to be away from all the noise and
commotion that conies from city living. Mr. Burns seems to think that we should be thankful to him for
bringing a business into a residential area. He does not seem to understand that we, the residents, would
have moved into a planned community if that was the sort of lifestyle we wanted. I do not believe that he has
the right to force all the residents of this area to give up their way of life just so he can make money!
Listed below are my reasons for opposition of the SUP:
Increased lighting from the larger parking area that will cause light pollution.
Increased traffic causing congestion and pollution.
Increased traffic causing possible death to wildlife and possible vehicular accidents.
Increased traffic leads to potential harm to children getting on and off the school bus, riders and people
walking.
With Superstition Manor allowing liquor to be served, we also run the risk of more drunk drivers on our
streets.
Thank You
Scott E. Schmier
1
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Judith Schrnier <cdnjudi@hotrnail.com >
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 8:47 PM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Cc: Darren Gerard - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor-Case #Z2014012
Scot E. & Judith H. Schmier
10344 [Jensen Street
Mesa, AZ 85207
Parcel #220-02-011B
Dear Mr. Banker: I am writing to inform you of our opposition to the Requested Amendment to SUP
#72014012--"change stipulation & add 4 acres, north west corner Signal Butte & Brown Roads, size 7
acres." First of all, Mr. Burns has always considered himself above the laws that the rest of the neighborhood
is held to. He told us, when he applied for the original SUP, that "no matter what we did he was going to get
what he wanted!" and that is what happened. Even without having the SUP he was advertising and taking
reservations before we went to court. Well he is doing it again! He is allowed at this time a total of 250
people, including staff on the property at one time. On Friday night, May 23rd, he had cars filling the parking
lot with access from Signal Butte as well as upward to 100 cars parked in the 4 acres with access from Brown
Road, a lot that he does not have a permit to use at this time! The SUP that is in affect at this time states that
"there is to be no off site parking" which is what parking on the vacant lot on Brown Road is. Also, using a
parking ratio given by Mr. Burns for his facility of 2.08 people per car,(he also claims that the ratio for the East
Valley is 3.87 per vehicle) he is well over the 250 people allowed on the grounds at one time! Before he added
the addition he said that he was able to hold two events at a time and, with such a large addition that makes
at least three events at a time. They will have to be very small events if he is only planning to have a total of
400 people on site at a given time. I would not be surprised to find that what he really means is he wants to
have 400 people per event, which could possibly bring a total of 1200 people into our neighborhood. He told
me that he has spent a lot of money on this business and that he needs to recoup some of it! I do not feel
sorry for him as he knew what the neighborhood thought of the idea when he bought! There are several of us
living here that have spent our savings to fix up a home and none of us are trying to run over the
neighbors! What about the people that put everything they had into building their dream house only to have
the way of life they chose to live destroyed because`of the greed of one man! Is the the new American
Way? I would also like someone to explain to Mr. Burns the difference between a residential neighborhood
and a planned community as that is what he keeps comparing us to and he can not understand that if we
wanted to live in that type of an environment we would have moved there. Besides the reasons I have
already stated I am listing my reasons for opposition of the SUP.
Increased traffic causing congestion and pollution. The residents have two ways in or out of the
neighborhood-Crimson and Signal Butte. Depending where you live and where you are going, having a large
amount of vehicles exiting Superstition Manor can cause a delay for the residents.
Increased lighting from a larger parking area will cause light pollution. There will have to be good lighting as, if
not and someone gets hurt Mr. Burns could find himself liable!
Increased traffic caused by guests waiting to turn into the parking area on Brown Road can lead to potential
harm to children getting on and off the school bus. On Brown Road and Signal Butte we have people riding
bikes and horses as well as walking and their safely will be put in jeopardy because someone passed a car
waiting to enter the parking area.
This increased traffic will also lead to shortened tempers by people that do not want to wait for a guest to
make their turn into the lot and they will pass illegally, thus increasing the chance of vehicular accidents.
Superstition Manor will be allowing liquor to be served so we also run the risk of more drunk drivers on our
streets.
Thank You for Your Time
Scott E & Judith H Schmier
2
Neighbor of
Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte rd
Mesa Az 85207
Name;. 0 o /
Address; // 4), JO? 6 1-
StateA Zip;. S21 D7 Phone; PI-KO—WO ge2:2C7
City; (yi
To; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
To; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
Questionnaire
What is the distance from Superstition Manor are you ier2Feet the Miles hall [1 yes no
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music from inside a ceremony [ yes M no
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music outside during leaving Superstition Manor [ ] yes 1)<1 no
Have you ever experienced a traffic jam or congestion from the traffic and Neighbors VI yes [ ] no Potiat-t
Would you like a Fourth of July celebration at Superstition Manor for the for Bagkiiiie the public and Neighbors t4 y e4a),ex Y
Would you like a New Years Eve celebration at Superstition relocating Manor part of their parking lot? IA yes [ no
Do you support Superstition Manor in expanding 6 acres and hours yes ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor request for holiday and school vacation day and time? log yes [J no
Do you support Superstition Manor holding multiple events on the same Aattiptbialk for Dents? yes [1 no
Do you support Superstition Manor being allowed to have outside pator rate
Have you attended an event at Superstition Manor, if yes rate your experienerelfqeatf your way of life or neighborhood ] yes)(j no
Do you overall feel that Superstition Manor has adversely changed
If yes, please explain
Manor in increasing their capacity to 500 guest (Average is 150 at event) ayes [ I no
Do you support Superstition IX yes [ ] no
Do you overall support Superstition able to Manor operate a business from your residence [1 Yes )4 no
Do you feel that you should be Planning and Development and Board of Supervisors to consider.
Comments or Concerns for Maricopa County
41-es. Date,3 .A.-/
NameRol/G74 DCrzcj Sigriatur
Signature Date
Name
RECF/VED APR g 7 201r
Neighbor of
Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte rd
Mesa Az 85207
c9i,oto
rT(L-
Name;
((fLf tj
Address; Zip; S9 Zo 7 Phone; Lt Ob ." Z3 /5`-- 39 7Z,
City; 0/1 ,6)4 State;
To; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
To; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
Questionnaire
What is the distance from Superstition Manor are you 1 WO Feet Miles no
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music from inside the hall Manor [ [ I I Yes yes no
Have you ever experienced a traffic jam or congestion from the traffic leaving Superstition [ I no
Would you like a Fourth of July celebration at Superstition Manor for the Public and Neighbors 1Ies no
Would you like a New Years Eve celebration at Superstition Manor for the public and Neighbors yes [ 1 J no
Do you support Superstition Manor in expanding their parking lot? hours to 8ain to 11pm daily 4yes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor in changing their operating same day and time? yes [ no
Do you support Superstition Manor holding multiple events on the Music for Events? yes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor being allowed to have outside Amplified
Have you attended an event at Superstition Manor, if yes rate your experience 10 great 1 poor rate A 0
Do you overall feel that Superstition Manor has adversely changed your way of life or neighborhood [I LJyes yes. [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor in increasing their capacity to 500 guest (Average is 150 at event) ryes [ ] no
Do you overall support Superstition Manor from your residence nyes [ ] no
Do you feel that you should be able to operate a business lunch and dinner es [ 1 no
Do you support Superstition Manor opening for meals to public breakfast
Comments or Concerns for Maricopa County Planning and Development and Board of Supervisors to consider.
cr-Aignatare
Name cie/{4 vi 0 kr/14 V]
Signature Date
Name
Neighbor of
Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte rd
Mesa Az 85207
Name; 4) Li Newe
Address; 1)19 N Sis cd &ff.(
City; ikte„ State; AZ Zip; 1570-2 Phone; L4 V.) 275 27,E1
To; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
To; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
Questionnaire
What is the distance from Superstition Manor are you SOO Feet Miles [ ] yes NI no
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music from inside the hall V] yes [ ] no
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music outside during a ceremony Manor [ ] yes 9:3 no
Have you ever experienced a traffic jam or congestion from the traffic leaving Superstition lot? Kyes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor in expanding 6 acres and relocating part of their parking
Do you support Superstition Manor request for holiday and school vacation hours [A yes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor holding multiple events on the same day and time? kryes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor being allowed outside limited Amplified Music for Event ki yes [1 no
Have you attended an event at Superstition Manor, if yes rate your experience 10 great 1 poor rate
Do you overall feel that Superstition Manor has adversely changed your way of life or neighborhood [ ] yeska no
If yes, please explain
Do you support Superstition Manor in increasing their capacity to 500 guest (Average is 150 at event) yes [ ] no
[-14, yes [ I no
Do you overall support Superstition Manor
Comments or Concerns for Maricopa County Planning and Development and Board of Supervisors to consider.
Signature 410<--a Date 5/1 8./Zetiti
Name
Name Signature Date
Neighbor of
Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte rd
Mesa Az 85207
Name; U d 4.4 trJX.e ci
Address; 3 s Al 7 CPI 5'i—
City; sxf State;itz Zip; SWIS-, s-z-oi Phone; —feIC
To; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
To; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
Questionnaire ,Josr -065r57-2,6c=r-
What is the distance from Superstition Manor are you Feet Miles
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music from inside the hall [ yes k no
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music outside during a ceremony [ yes no
Have you ever experienced a traffic jam or congestion from the traffic leaving Superstition Manor [ 1 yes X no
Would you like a Fourth of July celebration at Superstition Manor for the Public and Neighbors Kyes []no
Would you like a New Years Eve celebration at Superstition Manor for the public and Neighbors .14 yes []no
Do you support Superstition Manor in expanding 6 acres and relocating part of their parking lot? jxl yes [ 1 no
Do you support Superstition Manor request for holiday and school vacation hours DOes ilno
Do you support Superstition Manor holding multiple events on the same day and time? [4 yes [ I no
Do you support Superstition Manor being allowed to have outside Amplified Music for Events? 1),4. yes [ ] no
Have you attended an event at Superstition Manor, if yes rate your experience 10 great I poor rate
Do you overall feel that Superstition Manor has adversely changed your way of life or neighborhood [ ] yes b(1 no
If yes, please explain
Do you support Superstition Manor in increasing their capacity to 500 guest (Average is 150 at event) &eryes [ 1 no
Do you overall support Superstition Manor ,P4 yes [ 1 no
Do you feel that you should be able to operate a business from your residence , 4 yes [ 1 no
Comments or Concerns for Maxicopa County Planning and Development and Board of Supervisors to consider.
Name qU Lc.x.V..004 Signature /-111/0/ 42-L--6-1Adate 3//6/
Name Signature Date
OT
Neighbor of
Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte rd
Mesa Az 85207
Name; Pc)
Address; / /31- A) /dr‘k Sr-
City; StateL,47_, Zip; 0-2,09 Phone; (7E30 Vrn
je
To; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
To; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
Questionnaire atz.05 5 THC Tr05.67-
What is the distance from Superstition Manor are you Feet Miles WI
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music from inside the hall [ yes / o
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music outside during a ceremony [ I yes Nu)
Have you ever experienced a traffic jam or congestion from the traffic leaving Superstition Manor Ur yes Kno
Would you like a Fourth of July celebration at Superstition Manor for the Public and Neighbors Kies [ ] no
Would you like a New Years Eve celebration at Superstition Manor for the public and Neighbors I4Yes I no
Do you support Superstition Manor in expanding 6 acres and relocating part of their parking lot? Myes [ jno
Do you support Superstition Manor request for holiday and school vacation hours yes [ I no
Do you support Superstition Manor holding multiple events on the same day and time? ps yes [ no
Do you support Superstition Manor being allowed to have outside Amplified Music for Events? [yes [ I no
Have you attended an event at Superstition Manor, if yes rate your experience 10 great 1 poor rate
Do you overall feel that Superstition Manor has adversely changed your way of life or neighborhood [ 1 yes Ano
If yes, please explain
Do you support Superstition Manor in increasing their capacity to 500 guest (Average is 150 at event) j4 yes [J no
Do you overall support Superstition Manor k yes [ ] no
Do you feel that you should be able to operate a business from your residence pg_yes [ ] no
Comments or Concerns for Maricopa County Planning and Development and Board of Supervisors to consider.
; di ididsigiiature • ate C_.)
NamAUL
Name Signature Date
Neighbor of
Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte rd
Mesa Az 85207
Name; tindk, (A/Vt
Address; If A/ ha,1
City; M.P06 State; Zip; f5,2(2/7 Phone; ,g0f -c?Li3
To; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
To; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
Questionnaire
What is the distance from Superstition Manor are you. 76 6 Feet Miles
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music from inside the hall [ ] yes ['no
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music outside durin g a ceremony ['yes [ ] no
Have you ever experienced a traffic jam or con gestion from the traffic leaving Superstition Manor [ ] es no
Do you support Superstition Manor in expanding 6 acres and relocating part of their parkin g lot? yes [ f no
Do you support Superstition Manor request for holiday and school vacation hours yes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor holding multiple events on the same day and time? D(yes [1 no
Do you support Superstition Manor being allowed outside limited Amplified Music for Event D(yes [ ] no Ar
Have you attended an event at Superstition Manor, if yes rate your experience 10 great 1 poor
Do you overall feel that Superstition Manor has adversely changed your way of life or neighborhood[ rate ] yes' rA no
If yes, please explain e,
JYf 1 re e idf tidy
Do you support Superstition Manor in increasing their capacity to guest (Average is 150 at event) [ ] yes [ ] no
Do you overall support Superstition Manor 11 [ 1 yes [ ] no
Comments or Concerns for Maricopa County Planning and Development and Board of Supervisors to consider.
5 '-c- c-- CI e 5 r 07-1 K- VAd Q-( )p-k 1 vi c."(1
rafiNp14ted most( 0 QA-S de ()A4--4 du.51-e
Neighbor of
Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte rd
Mesa Az 85207
Name; Pecn --rt Sie-V
Address; 21 jel a s
el State; pc7 Zip; 75267 Phone; ti Sib — g 23
City; eS
To; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
To; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
Questionnaire
What is the distance from Superstition Manor are you Feet I Miles
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music from inside the hall [ ] yes NI no
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music outside during a ceremony [ ] yes N no
Have you ever experienced a traffic jam or congestion from the traffic leaving Superstition Manor [ ] yes N no
Do you support Superstition Manor in expanding 6 acres and relocating part of their parking lot? yes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor request for holiday and school vacation hours Pel yes [ j no
Do you support Superstition Manor holding multiple events on the same day and time? 04 yes [I no
Do you support Superstition Manor being allowed outside limited Amplified Music for Event []yes 1 no ?
Have you attended an event at Superstition Manor, if yes rate your experience 10 great 1 poor rate
Do you overall feel that Superstition Manor has adversely changed your way of life or neighborhood [1 yes 14 no
If yes, please explain
Do you support Superstition Manor in increasing their capacity to 500 guest (Average is 150 at event) Wres [ I no
Do you overall support Superstition Manor (yes [ I no
Comments or Conce for rni++31.I Iont.ini? ID" g qnd Development andl4oard of Supervisors to consider.
IP • _Pi • 1 f • A
VEVIRIMMILIIMIIIMIDIM i k
Name 19 e09kA N-Ncloy Signature Date
Name Signature Date
Neighbor of
Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte rd
Mesa Az 85207
Name; \ GUyen NOliers
Address; --ltAoi DeLQA-or sl-
City; Meg:\ State; Zip; Phone; 4-2)0-7-2.0- -68tog
To; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
To; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
Questionnaire
What is the distance from Superstition Manor are you Feet Miles fx
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music from inside the hall [ ] yes no
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music outside during a ceremony [ 3 yes Vino
Have you ever experienced a traffic jam or congestion from the traffic leaving Superstition Manor [ 3 yes N. no
Do you support Superstition Manor in expanding 6 acres and relocating part of their parking lot? b4 yes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor request for holiday and school vacation hours N, yes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor holding multiple events on the same day and time? N yes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor being allowed outside limited Amplified Music for Event VI yes [ ] no
Have you attended an event at Superstition Manor, if yes rate your experience 10 great 1 poor rate
Do you overall feel that Superstition Manor has adversely changed your way of life or neighborhood [ 3 yes r>4 no
If yes, please explain
Do you support Superstition Manor in increasing their capacity to 500 guest (Average is 150 at event) pl. yes [ ] no
Do you overall support Superstition Manor [>4 yes [ ] no
Comments or Concerns for Maricopa County Planning and Development and Board of Supervisors to consider.
Name Oki< tIcl V\IC11.5.-eFS Signature WGig Date 3/ \27/ \61-
Name Signature Date
Neighbor of
Superstition Manor
1220 N Signal Butte rd
Mesa Az 85207
Name;OJOVtf 12‘, s e,li
Address; //3.1.5"' A) /of 5 71-
City;',/4..5 4- State; az_ Zip; 2-Sc710 7 Phone; 93 '15,4-‘67?
To; Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
To; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
Questionnaire
What is the distance from Superstition Manor are youG.,(30 0 Feet Miles
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music from inside the hall [ ] yes Mo
During an event at Superstition Manor can you hear the music outside during a ceremony ] yes ,Piteo
Have you ever experienced a traffic jam or congestion from the traffic leaving Superstition Manor []yes 1)11‹
Do you support Superstition Manor in expanding 6 acres and relocating part of their parking lot? P6es [ no
Do you support Superstition Manor request for holiday and school vacation hours toof yes [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor holding multiple events on the same day and time? 2fr es [ ] no
Do you support Superstition Manor being allowed outside limited Amplified Music for Event yes [ ] no
Have you attended an event at Superstition Manor, if yes rate your experience 10 great 1 poor rate /0
Do you overall feel that Superstition Manor has adversely changed your way of life or neighborhood [ yes
If yes, please expl ' •
CI'(GO---4— -At.ci 1
Do you support Superstition Manor in increasing their capacity to 500 guest (Average is 150 at event) [s [ no
Do you overall support Superstition Manor yes [ no
Comments or Concerns for Maricopa County Planning and Development and Board of Supervisors to consider.
Name 0,20,21,1 Signature 141:;?it R.VSSE I ( Date
Name Signature Date
k If , 6,. 0 N K MAYOR Mesa Maricopa
0-0,1,- 14.4k4e \i)c) ri-Dwd c0-6,4e- ' i4] -TVefirci 'i-6171-izi2- City THE DISRUPT LITTER THE AND
ark ,(\i OWO\ ' ' A NAME City WHY WE WE
i 7 7v-Vf-i of Area: County WE PRESENT THE & PARTIES OPPOSE
Lajw 56tGLire_c k 0 Mc-6,,_.... dr-Eki / 4-' (Print) Mesa: DEBRIS OPPOSE OPPOSE
k,afer Cu--7.042- (216\VO\Via Mrc-Glec Area: BOUGHT
, ZONING PEACEFULNESS ON SIGNED THE ANY
.... __ Am 9a th-t ita 13'104 Representative: Representative: HERE. ROADS, BELOW DOUBLING
1)_2:-8" - „w-AK i 01 0 . ,..Y.4: N e.i.1 ?I ill it!, n. THE ALLOWS AND ADDITION CHANGES
- /03.3D . _ .- ' aa 11 ,.,..iVani--ili4 ARE
t'"I N. -- .ti\I ._1.0.2.11....g...,gik 3 #diebi -..`x.i::\.-,...&. Alutr ut FOR POTENIAL OF OF
-- . 0 r eirmire4-0 Wl.P.46. nk. orrn'pir.ce ZONING THE TO
ILtel'FI-' leitil.:P-- e-mail: ' _ 11140 TRANQUILITY OPPOSED THE
• 14- _MTh_ ( E, MtgOt - 600,2H-e-mail: IS TO RESIDENTIAL DRUNK THE
e-mail: email: €L. e-mail: e-mail: --,24:' e-mil: C-Prei e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: Zit/ e Were-mail: 'rphvi-YYsei.il- e-mail: OF TO PROPERTY
__k-'1.cs. 1-41t4 --_tbz.12.il f . ADDRESS REMAIN THE DRIVERS THE ADJACENT
' Ak_ca vvVesq,./.0c--- L A _ (Dax-LA 7 71,7` culcn USE SUP APPROVED
ealv--^-4-1)4 . . t- 1 Airr-- on ;1&;0E. (Print) ONLY AREA & AS SIZE
GOA1ZA iNk6a - Dr_1-6'ek P,'cle.-50.L __ ROAD IT FOUR
,I ' - - L ----' AusA- ci..r0`e bri.eil4- c..)rcx-in.Uemcq-e0. ezn?„ T5),•D'1- RESIDENTIAL AND AND FOR special
.---,-., ' ..,$.1: g52--o-v-- EZ0GAAI -- ik.-&' A7-- 05a-t/ -coait,...Q.z... IT KILL. INCREASES: ACRES
f Pg,-- 1 r , A-4 R1-35 SUPPORTS WILL use
:,...7,-zm'--'-'--,7, ''''''-- '-- L. -57k 74 7 elo 4:1,1".' ,' t j(Tv5-6T..,3-szo1 THE COMMERCIAL TO permit
criii ...c)- ive. ifr WITH THE HINDER TRAFFIC
-- - WI PROPOSED THE
Prt: Pti: pty ph: Ph: pa: Ph: Pa:" phl 1* Ph: Ph: pa: Pa: pa Ph ph: Pa: Ph: NO IF & WEST FOR
' )949-- Lio itt:d3.0- Ltgb a:,- '' Lila _ W Ip-3''113 1 F‘ cno_- Pada0- 9 To ?...v4 d-161- g.a.o- `.1.76,.. Councilman: Supervisor: NEW PEACEFULNESS NOT USE
kl 1 -2-4 t- --- -- 0 - bl- :13plat; - c--, (3 -q4 Ili o4 .2 D.-7.9s, 0- 0 PHONE PARCEL SUP PROHIBIT INCREASED CONGESTION, OF FOR
- - (Rob 1-24 - - 2.59 -,1)346in-3 (‘170‘46')Z. i Z.:7-7_ - 04- s,r5- cX St 04/-01_5 6e,/-q57i/8 - - m - C--i; os. 1-1- 0 4k-3,58-929g NO. NO. 8, SUPERSTITION
RECEIVED 005 Or -005 btA b\, C)tAl-clt)-1 4,3- 145-1- 1-ii - NO AND
V 6 (3 i 6 -'3 ) - Tc:- A1/4 -? D ‘,4c.,9 -W SAFE USE RESIDENTIAL PARKING
- C ' fr. i'' — C REVISIONS OF NOISE
JUN , - .() .Kil-Q-76 TRANQUILITY HORSE THE & & MANOR
' t'''."-4-4-A7 . TO & AIR
09 2 0. R1-36 MISC.
R--/--j-e-67-9L572-c-c4---,97 i (i}-,---lit SIGNATURE THE OF BIKE PROPERTY CASE
2014i _ 1 adge,k2 POLLUTION, CASE
, , v c-----I APPROVED THE RIDING #
-- ,,1. '-iliaYlc,f,._ WILL PROPERTIES. #
AREA IN Z2012086
5 J 5, SUP. AND THE FURTHER LIGHTING, Z2014012.
PET1TO5 5.10' VD/ 5/2- e)ILI i L S-5- ' S-5-li ..S - 1/572/7 Si5N DATE IS AREA.
tit. cAtfif t 2-Viq '<f 1L)
iti AY tH
(A\ < [ Dct\\ MAYOR Mesa Maricopa
7fl Erei:k( -E1) * City THE DISRUPT LITTER THE AND
I: de.)-e.( '1N4d4 cw?4, NAME City Area: WHY WE WE
A6, I / C-13‘s er. )- of County WE PRESENT THE & PARTIES OPPOSE
tOztvASA" J kAiot--1 (Print) Mesa: Area: DEBRIS OPPOSE OPPOSE
5 K-e-e0e5 -ii ,h,o, E---1P2,v- Q. BOUGHT ZONING ON SIGNED THE
PEACEFULNESS ANY
. ------ Representative: Representative: HERE ROADS, BELOW DOUBLING
101LI -.':' / iQ; D-Liz•La THE ALLOWS AND ADDITION CHANGES
1 . ioi--(1(6 oyi FOR POTENIAL ARE OF
___ • ZONING OF
4111AMPL.' 6 L4 IS TRANQUILITY OPPOSED THE THE TO
tv"` j)'ir TO RESIDENTIAL DRUNK THE
e-mail: e-mail: em e-mail: .1-LIY • e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: 6_1„zi-%cavq___ e-mail: ADDRESS OF TO PROPERTY
vkAg'5_kla S A k5:t. 1 REMAIN USE THE DRIVERS THE ADJACENT APPROVED
fxstit.42. 642_6. ol,L5 riA 1,e_i-t,ct j\k-fsict- feR152 CI SUP
31-A(019:70- - --------------- 9u,kb;)Q (Print) ONLY AREA & AS SIZE
2•7 7r:L frti23_er.\ e --bn RESIDENTIAL AND AND ROAD IT FOR FOUR
(6-Pb, VES,135gni1o, 7- rr.2.5, IT special
ficiThCtivi• . 47 tkz- OVA0412__Sza:,_ ?5,47-07 en-kfrilct rrkr), R1-35 SUPPORTS WILL KILL. INCREASES: ACRES use
t - TS-zo 2007- co/A THE COMMERCIAL TO permit
Lev,- P-A, a.CcW , iv? 551 WITH THE HINDER PROPOSED TRAFFIC THE
Rtk Pk. ph: pa: Ph: pa: lott Ptt.- 4: , ph: OLIO 11".??EL-- Ph: 4-t pa: NO NEW IF NOT & WEST FOR
tift A - Up- )9.0- L-)501-CY.76 41-5:0 ,;70.-. c 0-D IP) , _ ;P...g- PHONE PARCEL Councilman: Supervisor: SUP PEACEFULNESS USE
D g3z, v7026.123- - 2,?-0-09"-ON<': Vi-LOP 04- ____:__442,citt_r_ -00 43WARMIEr7 ct; H:tttt _ Oei & PROHIBIT INCREASED CONGESTION, OF FOR SUPERSTITION
ir0 VITo 0,1-ckscf- 3 oo -C7 9:‘F,FW vip Oto ' 06 -t NI- NO. NO., NO
1rq 7? p • 3 -44 -S-4g• ' , AND SAFE USE RESIDENTIAL PARKING
.:,,' P r REVISIONS OF NOISE
e-7A ,;-Awd,' nor ..- TRANQUILITY HORSE THE & & MANOR
TO & AIR R1-36 MISC.
SIGNATURE THE OF BIKE PROPERTY CASE
APPROVED THE RIDING POLLUTION, CASE #
WILL PROPERTIES. #
AREA IN Z2012086
5- I SUP. AND THE FURTHER LIGHTING, Z2014012.
PETITO5 6-1/20# 12-4'61 , :_qz_fk frk":11,1-\ DATE IS AREA.
I
p 0 PON, 7•0 MAYOR Mesa Maricopa
NALD ),,„,14 re:/-saf.vtvie, City THE DISRUPT LITTER THE AND
P NAME City Area: WHY WE WE
Poore • of County WE PRESENT THE & PARTIES OPPOSE
p,411,LR_ 4-HiLgt }lc Avce (Print) Mesa: Area: DEBRIS OPPOSE OPPOSE
a /YD.r.s1-n5tyq— BOUGHT ZONING PEACEFULNESS ON SIGNED THE
ANY
/115-- IVIC Representative: Representative: HERE. ALLOWS ROADS, BELOW DOUBLING ADDITION
ll, Iii, /0'710 /07/ THE AND CHANGES
i e 4, FOR POTENIAL ARE OF
/o7x-IL. 161:17t- 4 .e..... ZONING OF
O. TRANQUILITY OPPOSED THE THE TO
.r,51-:-., 57; a.ry ff"..-.1t_V., IS TO RESIDENTIAL DRUNK THE
e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail' e-mail: OF TO PROPERTY
DR op, yfif ..-P Lane La- ADDRESS REMAIN USE THE DRIVERS THE ADJACENT
iNi- Alg.-..44, DA F-54 txy-e , ckyty,,'"-p 4/ e_.. SUP APPROVED
2.1-1.., H pi /I es , Al (Print) ONLY AREA & AS SIZE
. Elf AZ Le jj,z_ e, c a., 4s4. RESIDENTIAL AND AND ROAD IT FOR FOUR
e Rg4 i 1 ,, IT special
a 83;2.607 ei Z HZ WILL KILL. INCREASES: ACRES
.67,47 862z77 -Ce.,fil 0..;-1, 3..5 'I. R1-35 SUPPORTS THE use
ta 20 d7 c 61)502' WITH HINDER COMMERCIAL TO permit
aim THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC THE
ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: Ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa:2 .h: Pa: NO IF FOR
21/e0 y690 •L20- : 4 A, 2 Councilman: Supervisor: NEW PEACEFULNESS NOT & USE WEST
CT- 20-0Li-o 0 -0Y PHONE PARChL SUP INCREASED OF
78Fa6 0-,07--0413/3.- vez,f-,5,067 57- ge9_3:5-7-7??', NO. NO. & PROHIBIT CONGESTION, FOR SUPERSTITION
Oftge-- ad -0/3C NO AND
1 72 SAFE USE RESIDENTIAL PARKING
I.-) er 0 /- REVISIONS OF NOISE
, pe-7-ze---ei -":::--.'-le-,_, TRANQUILITY HORSE THE & & MANOR
, ,... TO & AIR R1-35 MISC.
,P- ,,......, - SIGNATURE THE OF BIKE PROPERTY CASE
THE RIDING POLLUTION, CASE #
APPROVED AREA WILL PROPERTIES. #
IN Z2012086
,. SUP. AND THE FURTHER LIGHTING, Z2014012.
PETITO5 S7-20-14 DATE IS AREA.
/C/airi gQ7 MAYOR Mesa Maricopa
919-1d6e14:-/,/ -hi-ef.)-1 4e,/ NAME _ CI City THE DISRUPT LITTER& AND WE
teerl 'of Area: County WHY'WE PRESENT THE TREPARTIES
Fel FA/A/ (Pent) Mesa: DEBRIS VVE-OPPOSE OPPOSE OPPOSE
/1.r.-- P70-1A7 'Flinn Area: BOUGHT SIGNED
ZONING PEACEFULNESS ON THE ANY
'7•S' :7 _.5... - "5-12 -.;325,„. Representative: Representative: HERE. ALLOWS ROADS, BELOW DOUBLING ADDITION
1 THE AND CHANGES
Ca eitl! FOR POTENIAL ARE OF
. .C:(25.1-aic,Atte_, eifsh-t, _ "'"e‘e- zomNals TRANQUILITY OPPOSED THE OF TO
-':- : • ' . ' RESIDENTIAL DRUNK THE THE
e,-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: '•e-mail: .e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: e-mail: --e-mart e-mail: 19.-Y'e, ADDRESS TO OF TO PROPERTY
' Pro REMAIN USE THE CPRIVERS THE ADJACENT APPROVED
tre'eter- 2,-.5-g,Ap.,0e*), --t-eez.er57 Pe1oi3ecci,, P451,140.114611 (Print) ONLY AREA & SUP AS
0,atsza--,C" 7.7e--e7-eizSg7V&Ilei- 8 . RESIDENTIAL AND AND ROAD IT SIZE FOUR special
ca ei4, eD CA. ernmall:1-eelz5.3757,:1,426.L4e.a..",...ph:t195; CP' IT KILL INCREASES: FOR
ao t, Lil qIL3 R445 SUPPORTS WILL THE ACRES use
clot,corv-, ci3494 vi.p#A, ( ept--‘, q3Q-c-tq C167 WITH. HINDER COMMERCIAL TO permit
. . . - , - .4eP,-,."-- . NO THE IF PROPOSED TRAFFIC THE FOR
ph: p_g.j.. h: pa: ph: Pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: 'ph: : ph: pa: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph: pa: ph:F05, ph: pa: gm: NOT &
2-20 2.zo Councilman:i Supervisor: NEW PEACEFULN, USE WEST
?05-773-2-CM3 77/ .pa:2_69.b/6A 131.75-1-71±-2-qq3 -oti•;.-01 z.2.0.0/5- PHONE:NO. SUP & PRO BIT INCRE4SED CONG OF FO SUPOSTITION
„ e. -04.4.,0(6-.6 ,. 77/..,:29,?3 1,10-- NO SS STION,
2-W3 AND SAFE USE ESIDENTIAL PARKING
REVISIONS HORSE OF NOISE
TRANQUILITY & THE kAIR & MANOR
eatrillea-- ,e--0e12,(2-C TO BIKE R1-35 MISC.
itWhiee4,-1.1:----- SIGNATURE THE OF PROPERTY CASE
.. ,.-4.0..gCS-:-Z---L---- THE RIDING POLLUTION, CASE •#
, --et----- ,AL-2------, APPROVED AREA IN WILL PROPERTIES. #
THE Z2012086
SUP. AND FURTHER LIGHTING, Z2014012.
(0/%4- -6/5/14( .W5/iLi 6;75/1/i DATE IS AREA_
4 1 / / fv, li t OA 1-- t_ 1- V; 1 I
3 7 V5( -( (.? 31 -- , DATE
/ c I 1 give
my
1111, 1 L'il irri
r I , a VI- 04 oga (ha-x4 ..c),.vi cur -1‘R
I ,i, ralfol-6, 0 las Ve( Li a support
iAr ,...?..,,t_
le\1 arkkr5 /c-.4.-6.4e, LT to
a t_r5ei YA NbiraoacAcn iris-Ax-i.— ' L11-
• ,, i_Vir-ct 5 i-50 _), Gu-- LAY\ R14,-V_ NAME
kk-4/....____ facle-- c c-i c,\Asic ,e\=, -ii
i-ciki • Superstition
v\t-A. 1- s-e-n r
ck CEA ah c--(N- a'
../
1---
acre Manor WEDDING/FAND
60.2 r,50 `7230 C-0 ---7 LOD LA-o- LWO qs.c.,- 60 1-1&) 9 , (D9 6f for
- z. ' 0 ,Z 2-- - z- - 4c_ 1 ls (p257 02- wedding
r SO .. L-C..?0-c-Lzs- % t 0 Z (4-362 T7a 25sc‘-- 7 _ - - the RECEPTION
1 ?- -,21--- 21 I 426:2-- 1,5 69 % Z
c/ -,42A-J2-2) ,oaq-9././r - I e!S - - LP 27 6 PHONE PETITION
1 I 32-- .,7 --, bS ? -214 _.S,=,`t 57 2 -.67 - r133 park expansion HAIL
6 ff( Pb Sl7 g---103 I 5 • 'M il - 4577 # as MTH
VI 441 ,/- 717 75 1 1
? 7 • Cr well of IN
. Li
. as the iiyum,CULATE
17 z- f:2 • 2 &( 0 13 3164 163q ' i a 4
(0 7ll 6/ 7 Lt- H.0 3c4z 440 2-Z6-33 a 7(35 CI 2 acre YEWS
,S 1.N. e t Cop 7/7 9L60 i,o. (c, \N.) 5 o'- I.--), acre SUPPORT F
( .e,(.?__e.__,k).,/,,,9 itc zr-F_.--_ • c V N lot THE
g. A), Lorna_ (zreire _ silve.ccv vv),(12:4 Val , C.,,t parking just
oeCZ-0-e6A_ e-AAfri6 / t \I L_ Cart v
er-, 6t> r- `e.re_ux- &•-.1 i e- OF SUPERSTrTION
2 e 14A. f>._) G...[.; --eek i.);rt, i3+0-- west
e_s ll c7. ,--,s4- Prescji ..-if-L (14/1tApiDci -...:-/_-4(( &w-c.keo_te__ - 'EA cpc-N--) AqvA C_A-seR -cLie_ facility. of
., 7k/ _7frte.,v02) pit. 44' ar 3--) Dcl i . The mOu
0 .°.g, P 4r-zco pa , P--at ts-AiNs
4-x n-Le_sA- oitob ° i . 61vren A°, 14- Ua 12A.
fle..5 l'-- /9-z , \. • ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
0 0 c -ein" lc
4- % i 7-, tve_sq /4/16,6 /4its Hpse., ft,6‘.e-fr, lb< Cr , RECEIVED
7 ig-z- az° c, eeK 1-o1ie This
A -
,s7) ti_r gs--.., / *Lici-19 ft% Az- :,,rk Phi, A
Az_ 4._ p(ir 142— nz I APR
( 0z expansion
,f- 5 -sc 25.205- gSZ77 g 07
Ss---2 z Clal.) cd-3 ?s-oozzi will 2014t
Ls---- ,1 "c-C7Z be
7 a
2
4 it: 41 - I '5 •VS a ..._. • s '.- - I
tivi fri 84p '--3('-. 1--3i-4 --.M '3oLA I- DATE
it4 ',4- ig 4 i .1 -}14 I -i give
4 _. q !if • til
my
-'-'' , ,
&Lux Qpetn,-- -IT/ k 0 _ . I4-f' 41)---iliw
PAIrdi, f , 0 I Pau --Tititoe_ ..ii-re-‹_ favo,e4, A A
.* A i‘aPC, toiqw_ 0 i'alik support
Ead./77 , . flip t..A,I,„, , , if-0
*X)i / 6)
1 t to
.1? I' OLT\
lei& -9LwAgItr .- el le.....4 # A
Cie-- , r 1/1 i:. -er t 1 el +erI -,: a• NAME
11 ..f_ ' Rqs-e-v2,3 A.kI-i . ' A_ e_1\-,re_ Chaitz_, Superstition
k6uctly__ 4
,P
if vl Y
7 V- 1
, Sc a
, in WEDDING
Manor
acre
3 /-6 4 q LAND
4- ict 69, 511- 70 3 1 '11 A C/o (8o L.-Kr kit O- Looz- i 0 • A for
0.-- - 1 - - 1 4 - go - ) Ø -- o wedding
. - - - 14 - -Si -, the RECEPTION
ago- itt q (DCZ- 67 --22-6 -7 -di*
3-93- 518 % IF\ sio VI Szce L PHONE
,)1E---7(16V q - eA--- 5 - - 8-co (-) park PETITION HALL
- - —7 da-c)--7Qt F --(17 to-qcc7 expansion
_ /-786- Tc5s o-LAI ZS' N It/ - '7' - , %MTH
-Vt. 5545 ' I 0653 a. tier5-7 iE-- # as
a, ..-- 3ci 9 • a-,5" 9VC, C c-'1/40I k- of
H -? well IN
7 6 --9.-- the •1I'AircACULATE
as
/n • Rog --- ".:. ag c /3 / 1 • gi a 4
1 5305 tebr4 vz--4 7101 • b•-; 5673/ 7 A raL0 • )) 2-kz-Mfb 2
(g ,.. VI 0 4 aCein \Ocic-3' 0 /6, ig- acre VIEWS
0 .- . 7 3grSe g • / iL).- et) E. acre SUPPORT OF
9,04 .-- - s- - CZ lot
4paA_ Nam) 5, -' r, - 4j,4 L. - THE
La-la...t,L. ceit-fAckaa - (C, ' just
a r:` 5-gi0-060a-A> P3 are-rAi i parking
•I V,-t-4- ...i ).'"1 1 OF
br- ctc2-0--t .1±' 'cl-\. el tA -Pribbit-ts.1-.) west Sr-PERST1TON
C 14.6.4. , Melrose ,--e_$-r-‘ '8°
9:-. Cedar 6 _ 5•7,-. • i 0 40 facility. of
s 4-- --
oInMilralaNEMIINMIRS. C LA,641,-. 4 ... be_ -.# mc--,0/0--utikA, , 'et The
c[17__ fl, P.,„Ii-- MOLATANS
4 FA 6q 41 = -
A 'Jig rlevt.-5 LA 0,17._ -/MS i 40,-) ketrrA ,t/Lesct
II i `,• • rA, ( . 1_2 ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
at:i 412zuwttkite„L can-4vAzi kca ,_. • X 1 i becti a' )2
d eeepitiL 1c1 ( . ,1
k i - Munc 24-2 This
__ 5043 IC) A /4- sp."-zo 42- 4z- /
' .0 2_
_14.--11- I- i vAo "Z__ p. ,Le g
, Pillows; es expansion
• e. S 15- rk r
f ?X7 AI"
_ g.5-Zo 20-46' gS \NKL,
5.3.---i-e--.5 IA- 5-2. 14 IF52,c/ Az__ 1 • 2.07
A 0.,Y 2.-2-tr will
8. ,
6- 02 1-?4ft s RPA be
5-
5A-t1ef) D-0 A ., . a 2
4, _o- -- Z 4, '
-,_
-
V 3' I` - 3 iri•. )s lif iw '1 ' '1 LS/ I
) ( Vi `7.--1 P - /Vol i 04 vs-/Lt 1/ / 1-3/-117/ DATE give
H IL\ ti Y 1 iq i ev g + /a I
' my
f'//,` q& ,--)— `----4ot 4W
L-T/N rirekti`S #e ,. i1 . AyrN 0--17 EIGLIA support
, ,\ X. 4.A at__
6r/A , - 7 . OilAis e . 4`(--A
/4-3-0i4.-- / . L..6 N n to
,-' 'o Le:A(1N)
V Glaiv-vcS 'PO -, A 2AJ-e--s ;e/ NAME
/ . /3V5-2) Superstition
9-v -- aA,---v-ka,r-41, ..„.... -5 47)
-
acre Manor WEDDING/AND
6 ,, , •-- Li `f
LRO a- 4eco Ara7 ;0 --v-.0, 209 Vo go (--/c6 (#60 %CI- (.40v .4,6- 602- for
-7 3 23757 A (8-0-- - ---4 , 2-`-k LaV.-37 wedding the RECEPTION
6 4Sco 5/63 &' AK eat- /C, 42 - 6 --g/zi 5l7 ,,W--
(o 5 - 3z ao\- 7 77 T.31,- 14--1 PHONE PETITION
- , VI/7 C, tfri/ 7- - ( - park expansion KILL
-(09,(q US ?a77 - I ' 2/,1 eal r --- q 0 1 iky- q'zA gr'6V33 P‘t 5-0 # as WITH
ir 1 irdn, - 7 (01)- --1(- 24 .ese of
/'/ well IN
the IMMACULATE
as
ii tr till / 6,e, 6 0 11 (/Z a 4
Ng( 3s 82-8 -(4, 5e45 ‘4.21/ 724,3 -3577-6 c\l'A ILIAcK .Z--N 0 2 acre VIEWS
.., ziiir ,a41 2,470 0( acre SUPPORT
g . 04)- S. 5 E,- 4/6 iq lot OF T
tAi 5, . L - Ei vi _-.-
- r dp. cot- . Vet ,Zi_j---S--- parking just
wecK.rc _ crock, ii cfak [ SY2,L,,,e-e OF
7; e:/- / Of41 Pronci -JA- V Miff west
e ik) m.11ptialc -"-: cis. efrEple..-r 4 '-1 c.e.-ei2-.."1-e-ii---1,-2 ,S facility. of
o. /if .0' p et 1,0r-v1 1. -, The
r,._: _. 7/.A,1 44---e 111'1. vvv020/2_ 5G,A F-cl 12x. btia C__ed.t MOUN7AINS
•t_. c - deal
im ii: eka 4-ye,. ,A... A-5f *o ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
eitessi --? m a 11 L -k,t (0
K — - p-id, ke-K 4 GAlcv 1/1/144 rg- This
)4 Aig Ai214/,///2— 341z _ S I Me-Seak. i'l-e-4-71 Yc 9766 C
it ,...,,,_,6___________ tra4.- tivz 1. Jatki s---/ ike.<5,2.--- ',"/--
Ai :41° -- ' 4,1 itl-- 1 / 4/ v expansion
- Ale- ce,(5- -2 i_./4- I ,...
2-i /f
9S-CXa-"? I f a I Z5act will
xz_._ 7 r-5 zt? -cde.- y
,J--2.3ii 6, be
2C/f .41-0 ------1 02 a
2 2
, 1
- I
*Pi DATE
I give
if
11111111EF my
support
I/I
__,Z.-
MaliWilata N to
A. ar.
Allh•rki
tir" • . il
1 RM. Superstition
...xi/
1
acre Manor WEDDINGA/AND
/A %:-. ::-.• for
WPM-4 Kt& wedding
the
RECEPTION
2.59- 7-64- . _ _ AI , PHONE PETITION
/ I park expansion HALL
tz,--5Y- ,:fr # as WITH
0 Pi
/ well of
0 IN
- as the [MMACULATE
a 4
/OR 2
1 ( / acre acre UPPORT VIEWS
'I
lot OF
, .0N ,-- THIE
parking just
OF
0 /1 west SUIDERSTITON
Sor7/411.4. ‘,u,i.
facility. of
r1T
I ADRESS-CI The MOUNTAINS
'
I( Manor.
lite,
Y-
This
i r ( i T-ZIP
Are expansion
i
WM
c)57-ci ( will
.
' be
a
// :iv= 2
ts ILI _. b ,g ek, S5 it ,, i I
DATE give
ii my
144. Po
,... J92thkee-C 1—e., t i _
5 a V71133/1Lesk. ! elliii ---cms- QIK 4,41 e support
-.„_, it, Li P
.e__-. Lane -I-A
QV , N. to
i.,, Lei\i'UJUJ S-C4---'-(tre,---2_ WNik P,A 6/5t.
CjO com S-3rEe, 0,
-e, P/G1M-C 2-- K- 6 Superstition
\U
CV) 4i," friwe-1
"_)
0 1
WEDDING
Manor
acre
ccIr° 4 LIE0 4 zigp LI 0 for ArAND
\--t4'D 0 v6-71 - Cocik lo t - -3 -
-u a -- 3 - 7d wedding the RECEPTION
* sit 4 cr- 3.:3" - 765 54-3 D 1 gip
- 1 o — 00k- I '1 - \,c.., - 2- PHONE PETITION KALL
14?" 10 Sio 6878 - a- 2, park expansion
vokG \nt -3q30 Cr) -371 59. # as WITH
Htn 9-0 tx, ) (, ?q7 11.41,
5 well of IN
as the ,ACULATE
1 Soq ZIM. 6\ a 2 4
30 lZ,3 uc5 5\g3`‘ 1 /-(t1 i'LL -./ acre VIEWS
---I tg-gPa5 . '6' E. MG, 3 g- acre SUPPORT OF
L oi f-- ci6 0 a A lot
N. ,...7.2 & ciz,-,p\ Ai, THE
- _ aen&tiv Re parking just
\o-rtn co_ ----i-. i-lt vu,,,i 1--Lk, .3i-ncib-4 r. , OF SUPERS:7-7-0N
tAl6firi i t-cp west
c_. me 7 iciA ...g--u-
6-1-- (b) 5•, wh ' 6 Av. facility. of
-5 5 %. Or - 14 The htiOLPc7A1iS
okci, olte.,. _,±',. P _ 'i p __(/ •
yYkesci 1 ktAA-Pe, G
.--S- /vie 4
2- ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
, oci .0, sc_,,A,4-k. 541 7ice-/6 frt-c_IA, h/L.<9
IA 7C1-
-a _‘ A //1 t? di This
v611 Tatir\ ",!52-6 v,,, i-V2-
Rs - , j-c_"- C (,
VA (C k
z,[)7 < 5,/, g-52- , -5-- expansion
RgSrlw 35c/
5.?-6 4 g2, 0 5 3 ,i_o_
-7 will
(4 G1
, (ccr6s4AKe 4 d be
j „_____ a
8111-0 1,-7_0 2
;
f3A '131.frY I
, V3//fil f3///91 , DATE give
C my
t‘Ar Sieve 1-1-01L1
6:e4-c..-97 support
tole
to
4."7 f&w'2d-1/ yvIAYK NAME
_57-1,'H
Ad+ Superstition
Manor WEDDING
acre
AJD
Nit)) -.:.rst 4R0 for
77 - wedding the RECEPTION
3 66,1 7511 *~,25/-r720 PHONE PETITION
-Si), 9 - park expansion HALL
-StS5 ‘.1 r # as WITH
--:." it,
la. well of IN
as the IMMACULATE
/0,c(0 IfOs 54 5-36 a 2 4
(t, 3 acre acre SUPPORT VIEWS
00 = 00 L.,.) u. lot OF THE
1 I. = 1 i parking just
0 kt) tAxonA6 P702buc/ west OF SUPERSTMON
,c.k- E'4--
• . facility. of
kle3 AA tAA4- gel: The MOLATAI`SS
c-, s'cl_ 01 '
I. / , ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
A ,-.2e,,;(0p4
' Pvt This
/ow/1u) / 1
t-r Ps e
91,0-7 po, GPI" expansion
7_ 24
Pc--z_
will
,eci3 be
tii- a 2
. 1-- .31 I
_ 31-1L+ 1-N , IL( 3// -/V DATE give
.
L my
Rah ,
MAcr-.0‘._ cin-)\p0,- cti- - , support
)GUSY1f. rtri ,
Li
ricoptAle_f_w--. 0',e to
S-\--ohf-r- Dockepa ?An glet,e. $7,9 NAME
OriarVio '
(I /e, Superstition
Manor WEDDING
acre
(4 cooa 6 ‘‘? 6 for AND
c/f- (
7 — i - wedding the RECEPTION
4F0---).1q-ne0 c60-ZuN iTho5cA(Dz7 3}01 fq 5
, - V/ PHONE park PETITION HALL
LH! 6 expansion
-7_1 1 2-3-0 —C. z- # as WITH
-7 Vi well of IN
as the VIVACULATE
?Do "5-z_77 GOO / a 2 4
1393 1.- acre acre SUPPORT VIEWS
ik), E I\A (4). 57, 6.-"le'CIP14 lot OF
. , THE
ige/e//, parking just
-t-iitirictija OL.ivyvic )cvd,c west OF SUPERS-7710N
-/vct_s!t-ot5ioc 07to "1•1--0
Aki-c - facility. of
1 C 3 The MOINTAINIS
(`-)Ie-co_ L5i -)r. (7/i htz./76&,, -5`)"
J ,4 ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
3cm .,sk\V- ih2,14,_A-3
Int-E- ,"--2_5>6( This
-ray) 1-4.--- /-7/-e---p-
'g5g/OrT vif fk_2_ 8S'a3 ‘) expansion
J ticb\ S5a3L-1 .3 4 will
)sk
be
Y‘ a
)(-(ro 2
1 V.31 1 ' '1' \ c-- LL I
_ 310 3(i 1- ,f3‘. [73tiff 1 - i \ I DATE give
4 11 iq 19 14
4 ' my
PlTr't -I) C • / N;
5A. Aa NI'Cde- /V/c-ic -1-c(rl\arcr. Maw ', co
t aVt-on ( Ave I support
ci ra-N-1 e
/431,1;ler L, \Art to
ev (J'Ar(\I&-Y1 /, Cook-- i 4 • , I/ \
A Kar-o_Sh t-r1 4ii. - f- NAME
6-1 ada i 1
---S Superstition
1513_5 (' i)ciinn
,
s
Manor WEDDING
f,- x__. acre 1111 AND
WO CA) cool) OVS)- (f-leo VD • L \t- liqD (LKD for
old (45z0)-bo k,'-- -i - wedding the RECEPTION
3 '1!.!; -1
a-DC-10 9061- a33- 9I2)- Z16 W4— L4(cr6 (pi (90o
--045-63 0 Z - - -7 PHONE park PETITION HALL
t'i ck003 -XtP SS Lilo& Co Le - expansion
3 A,4 5 (0 ..-"/. -bi(or M 90 # as WITH
I 1
s- - 0-3 well of IN
, as the IMMACULATE
C;iqb3 lint •..k.. ryz_ 1 29 ri,M 4M 10 a 2 4
11366 )46110 82 [ I 3 l' acre VIEWS
. E B -- to acre SUPPORT
E P 5 E. ki")* 1,i-, . LJ3 a lot OF
uu, LMVitl - THE
, parking just
..5710pr-KEy iivs46 AfeeGi (krome., Pc3c.3.0 Loi3sTrEir 0_0L,eycbk-ift c f,.4,91musk. west OF SIJPERSTTION
'-•., 9,)AA*\aln
A- facility. of
44 Or- Ni,e, 1-- soc,..t -ONI\)fal The MOUNTAWS
,4v0- . --Rieke
k-k-ecci.) 4 < 4 in Nye
ingg nilaxt.;:opAi sI Ls., --An ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
1A11,0,51 -prz_
ik-t ,(J , RZ-W56I ini\-,ec This
4
71- At 1'
mce,;atez,e_
e5 ?a20q CA
i AsAzie'r-- c12 expansion
eicz_67 sg
ik ?,c-- ‹F will
;a3— be
2-01' a
2
"- 1‘ r- 4.-- 4-- * 1311 I
-._ ,, J — 3i-1 3.--2/.44' s5j-fq -: DATE give
1.-' ,--1 +1 l- frIt i (.1- . ILA
Iii
' my
,./' ,....... Mrkir
' '47_0
y -FTr4:1/./4 -PAlc. LAtit W1C1 support
ST1,1_, /._.e. D..-fviec,›
_A _ -1
_.( ut)E-11J'3E-- to
/: i. r i rr4 /LAIL Lake.
li • tA) tvci,„y.. NAME
0_ I 14 A-i
_ (*.t._ .., J.-.3 Superstition
a:kd '40.0 162-a— .ei
41, fr :',4411,,,
WEDDING
Manor
acre
c--- /AND
GIO ‘9 430 Ill V qg6 Lt<0 ' 480- for
0 Oqi—&;r7 -a---- 6 — - —7 • wedding RECEPTION
A-3 3 ---a the
2-?)
- 5C0(4.(2 --b& ‘-- G7,,c7a. - S-- 2-1-11— PHONE PETITION
(.0 \ ja-- '') park HALL
-cNo expansion
jr 4,0 51i. ( --ii # WITH
---SV627 7 ( 3'1 as
7 e't. 3 well of IN
IMMACULATE
as the
1 / ( a a 4
q 2-154 )93 /c9.5 110-7b 2 VIEWS
Iti i,-kCI 6 .F Oso acre acre SUPPORT
AL OF
/ u) L lot THE
0 NC E PA. E. 1-0
. W. L€Azu_pe_ _ parking just
gill- , Na ni--- OF SI.JPSRSTITON
. .0, trisNrYw7A-6 Mr1,911-IArn west
- ' c , Ad V.)am.41 facility. of
421,0e._ c--
_Of The MOUNTAI1NS
AL" ZenliriMPW . r i,4VS-- -..,'II
_ ---e)
,O''' __,A. 'ffe:, P vi7. I YSA 50,47 ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
3Va-4&(-114.4 &C) St,
... , t-Tian
4 ZO
.. 4 i inn,e-s4 R-Z._ a This
Al VAlic,4
a 'g
ffP 1 S n+-i'lLJ expansion
-7- 6 a Nz.._
Aar 11-2
will
'A,
be
'-59-.___
a
2
k
A • a-( ) 2 , X 24 -
Zit- 6 )- • s /1c --/ A /3 Jg (6 1 3- THE
0 ii a 1 'fbIlif - i - s-- PIASAIEW UMW THILIFLIC /t( iv I'M/I 14 pi 1 9 DATE
4/ Li 11.11.11.101, (-/ 14 (4-
EXPANSION
A - ' r t° 4- 1 , ivime ,4, 4 CAlr)
1Q50o. 4 A OF
leto t zc'or' 111 I
cber-1- 4 0
.. _ ra-er_r9 IANNITEM2F . 4=7 it 4770/X hi
Ccoi Err• SUPERSTITION
„ 44)1967___ cryy4
deo 64-0.., IJ., , i 6 IT h. NAME
ei 3 Auclua g-UPP it- E.(50k._ 44t tii WEDDING
1 MANOR.
INTO THIS 'AND
A John Lisa
, ...tatimueyx 2 Burns Burns RECEPTION
ACRE EXPANSION
,-__I. . 111111011111111111111111MM (480) (480) HALL
- 1W 16 a im 646/, ',4$ q8o WEDDING WILL PETITION 560-4390 720-7535 1220
41VO4Vrt — 2, -2. PHONE N WITH
IV eYtq . 2 9 2_ ' (Call (Call Signal
4'(2-t../19-cc7S/ —q”-- - a f iptp-ti PARK INCLUDE IN or or Butte IMMACULATE
-ct 11167,CMIMIMSANNWPIMININIIIMOSTRIMMIE4ZZLIESWATEMS7/17/eiMMINIE I t V LBS NUMBER AND Text) Text) www.snnerstitionmanor.com (480)279-3906 Rd
St-74g riziv 57 Y77 1 394'1 -/2,4/6 tps, A THE — Mesa
2 2 4 SUPPORT VIEWS
" ACRE ACRE Az
f ' 85207 OF
lit v` d /V SL-k. 50 LOT iohn(tsnoerstitionutanor.com —liso@superstitionmanor.com THE
C. -10_7 r4z-• A -171-79 PARKING OF
A N JUST
a N. j - SUPERSTITION
E, e. •.— WEST
alornino lot 0(419, FACILITY.
K Mite Ali xi OF
(lex Mill....111111111.1101.11111111111.11111111111111111.111.1 • ADDRESS, LIOLPC7ANS
ilrit Gimit
SUPERSTITION
. IENWIIINIMIIggfflilril. - ) CITY,
Di%,6714,er-f tt lo iliflagjAff-MPIMIT.,
... • mesa STATE,
"1—er%-vot- i MANOR
cRi,t,, ZIP
.46 ,,- BEING
-.?
ss-zT6
DEVELOPED
5atnci„ " c f alta
AI
,
_ 2' 911-i l• DAT I
1 -7 give
LW ,..
NIUMNIF my
"
EMMEN,
agialmen23 i Rvssett , support
' ...._ to
rAmlx.T,A,
11.11111111.11111.1. 1111111111111111111111111 IMITIIFF......1 MaIMINITill111111 vvv miffimpimmm NAME
1.11111.11.111111111111 - I -Se Superstition
,
imam 1111INEMOIMUNIIIIIIIIIMIMININ
IIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIINIIIIIIII 11111111111111.111111111110111111.1111111111 1.011111111111111.1.1.111111111=Mill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIII OMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIOIIIIMMIIMIIIII 111111111111111111111111111111111.1111111111 MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMEIMI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIII Ail= Manor WEDDING,"
acre
(RC for ti.7 D
(oal-- ,?-3 06 -3 "` 44T,A-sss- ad— OP- -- wedding the S RECEPTION
Ld2-0 a-k ‘2.1 r
.- v PRONE PEflTION it
11111111.111.11.1. IIIIIIMIIIIIIIIII IMETIZEMNII ......... 339-0841._ ' k.-tc.-s 1111111111TRIMIIIIIIIMINIOBLIMMIIIIIIIMIEMMINMENIM - park expansion A/ HALL
cn—wc7 0 06 FW # as )10TH
"SW -1--cr--- well of IN ')' L MAC
; as the ATE
e-f2,-r le ,D__ r a 2 4 V:LEYT
96,.( SD 3G5zs - acre SUPPORT "'
-7-. Do-z S- 50..1"4- • 1507 acre lot OF
g- 6 --G" MilleiRME t,QsT ‘,L' THE
k( i A/ Ai parking just i1/t-A-4
b diPt I I-Ji-1541) tco,,,Lcw west OF SIJ.'t1-(S7TION
, so._ a-3/../ 5r 0 Al of
* _ • g---IN Ae facility.
1 • The MOUNTAINS
GA .._ 4 mta-cor•A- ___-.-i6'
4k-- ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
or A /
A-„, .„•141._.. 47- This
4 440".I TM ,tc/4-
t'18 Mzi
L expansion
r 'ard
_Wilk . _.. I Z.
r- 4 •05 will
be
-4-4fs. a
2
L' _ '
, --- I
IL give
22z my
2,-0 DATE support
' t to
Superstition
4/1 WEDDING
Manor
• acre
iti 'AND
for
NAME' wedding the RECEPTION
park expansion PETITION HALL
F... as WITH
well of IN
as the IMMACULATE
SZ a 4
2.g-- 2 acre 'ITEM
acre SUPPORT OF
a lot THE
/ just
PHONE parking
9 „ west OF SUPERSTMON
? #
facility. of
The MOUNTAINS
Manor.
/
7 This
-Li
—714 47 expansion
S-6— i-T ADRESS
,Oti- 1 will
4 be
Mzej '0-6,-4 a
2
,-k. qs --
IM`61T7:-/ I
TE give
my
support
to
Superstition
Manor WEDDING
acre
/AND
for
wedding the RECEPTION
4(80—cos-z_-055S PHONE park PETITION FALL
expansion WITH
# as
well of IN FV1P+FACULATE
as the
a 2 4
acre acre SUPPORT VIEWS
lot CIF
parking just 11-11E
west OF SLPERSTMON
facility. of
The MOUVAIINS
ADRESS-CITY-ST-ZIP Manor.
This
expansion
will
be
a 2
KY Mt DATE THE
EXPANSION
.-.
_._• _ _.....e. OF
••-''— _.
__--trw- -- - SUPERSTITION
-L_—_-"ar A. .:-...ip.-
NAME
MANOR. WEDDING
...,---_,,--- -
INTO THIS SAND
2 A John Lisa
ACRE EXPANSION Burns Burns RECEPTION
(480) (480)
.:vz ,AI WEDDING WILL PETITION 560-4390 720-7535 1220 N HALL
0 PHONE Signal WITH
, PARK INCLUDE (Call (Call
-7 6, t7 IN or or Butte
NUMBER AND Text) Text) www.supersfitionmanoneorn (480)279-3906 Rd IMMACULATE
7.--1 2 A 4 THE — Mesa
SUPPORT
ACRE ACRE Az VIEWS
85207 OF
i PARKING LOT OF iohnQsuperstitionmanor.cont —lisa@superstitionnutnor.com THE ../reameat
3"t t.?66r i' JUST
( di WEST SUPERSTITION
M FACILITY.
it...// -.;, OF
ilr. ADDRESS, MOUNTAINS
A---e pee2 SUPERSTITION
•%-...` _ CITY,
Av‹._. 4i.
Ar 1 4 , STATE, MANOR
- . --- ..02._ 41 1 ZIP
- - BEING
(›,...,..-A. es..-z..4, 11 1€
.."MA DEVELOPED
it
537 Ass-Ay --j ' _.
I
A t t cai
221= THE
'(--(0-4--14 MOM
ig rifkMillIM
INEINAMinf M EXPANSION
SIMINIIIINVMM Maifireti
q-c-t EMENIFAVATWM. C -
re- EMORMIORMTW2,74.74 OF
- . 4t a
EICIMINEEMIARIM. r-I ,.-' -,,,
•, SUPERSTITION
04 lU*
• ...11E-6L13 •
6 NAME
.f
-I- 4i . MANOR. WEDDING
(_,
Sclit_ttA-7e -c-- INTO AND
y 2,0L_)- Aeor THIS
- A 2 John Lisa
RECEPTION
ACRE EXPANSION Burns Burns
(480) (480) HALL
_ , CI ___4s-- ‘.yat WEDDING 1220
isr14 Aul-- 4)23-1-zq . ' WILL PETITION 560-4390 720-7535 N WITH
P-- . 6 PHONE
- 02 --R, ( iP -'-'-' PARK (Call (Call Signal
MISPREAVIffi -s( - k 4 A 1 - — - INCLUDE IN or or Butte IMMACULATE
- I - - 0 ,,---a o -LI- NUMBER AND Text) Text) www.superstitionmanor.com (480)279-3906 Rd
se 4 , A THE -
Id 6 - • ?° 2 4 SUPPORT Mesa VIEWS
, - ACRE ACRE Az
. 2 85207 OF
` Ic....--ss . z LOT OF iohnAsuperstitionmanor.com -lisa@superstitionmanor.com THE
r$ 36 I- clifffrIONNE6-iiimWArge -' PARKING
k, . JUST
cr_.3 hut GA / - Los lk, SUPERSTITION
t _ , FACILITY. WEST
6:64 4 1-1- Am:: . . OF
qc_Lop.-fe..a. ( f -4 -vi. I MilLailtdr271
4 S )43-c/ --. ADDRESS, MOUNTAINS
PR, 9- WEIFIROWNMUNZArieffitiari rsigo,
o: 11, ' .e. PIAIRTMC SUPERSTITION
. cic_, P Az w CITY,
e l
10 NI • Ca 41/ i
1 AOcfr'doOM-- \ . STATE MANOR
4 ' .s (14). "14 ke.I'vtLf LI me--tc_.- '
AMMO' ;'" 77 IP
/ C-77-7 a., v- /ea BEING
% 41 L 're'
5.--3...c: AL1,,, miLQz.- DEVELOPED
:AMA% 64-1 AMER
3 lla ,---)w
THE
EXPANSION
OF
SUPERSTITION
MANOR. WEDDING
INTO THIS fAND
A 2 John Lisa
ACRE EXPANSION Burns Burns RECEPTION
(480) (480) HALL
WEDDING WILL PETITION 560-4390 720-7535 N 1220 WITH
PHONE PARK INCLUDE (Call (Call Signal
IN or or www,suoerstitionmanor.com (480)279-3906 Butte IMMACULATE
NUMBER AND THE Text) Text) Rd
A 2 4 SUPPORT Mesa VIEWS
ACRE ACRE Az OF
85207
3o LOT OF —johnAsunerstitionmanor.com —lisagsuperstilionmanor.com THE
PARKING JUST
E. WEST SUPERSTITION
FACILITY.
OF
MOUNTAINS
DDRESS SUPERSTITION
CITY
MANOR
STAIZP
BEING
DEVELOPED (C)
wi
THE
MIMI MIMI esman ERENIIII .11111 MEM= MUM Ifirain. ILMITAIII DATE
Krzurifirm .. 571,1011111
llimirifft EXPANSION
' tynimik' I INEINIIMIWIW IIMMINIEMIlt iiii=11111111/
6 'i /1/ IIIIMMINIF/Mr~:. OF
•
a kW 3
VIIMEMIEWN. K at
I'' SUPERSTITION
,ifil i C -
1 IMP' • ,-
IAL a iv
._ /L-X tv MANOR. WEDDING,AND
g
Lttc_ - INTO THIS
____Ile-S---IM ...ordam 42 John Lisa
ACRE Burns Burns RECEPTION
EXPANSION
(480) (480) HAIL
1 lrr -0.0 I.- 0 i P /7' WEDDING WILL PETITION 560-4390 720-7535 1220 N WITH
SO 3 - - - - - i - PHONE (Call Signal
i 6 - -32,)-2 36 f - C ( PARK INCLUDE IN or (Call
111.1.11.1111.111 Ak tO Ito— Mire&VIVIN - rraTEIFORM o - - — Text) or www.superstitionmanor.com (480)279-3906 Butte IMMACULATE
11111.11111111101111111111111.11111111.111111111111111.11111111111111.1111111111111111111 ." . IPMESINI 0 L . NUMBER AND Text) Rd
imusrmermorvm firmazi CI q AO Pk r 0 A 2 THE — Mesa
`122 - I d 1.p1 .4 SUPPORT iohn Az VIEWS
716 ACRE ACRE OF
- a - at a LOT —lisa@superstilionmanor.com 85207 THE
46t IL(2.7- a 22.5— 14//, PARKING OF sunerstitiontnanor.cout
r_ 0 IMINIffi 111M-AMYY JUST
2.-r L SUPERSTITION
-su 01/L46. LaLb E-- 1\.) WEST
2 A-) 13-e FACILITY.
I (Akile.A-r t, i A, , r" OF
LK b. , cA2 e-A i-e- MOUNTAINS
c-1 ,-ii-i .--4,-,\,- A ..I -0 6T- ADDRESS,
c'el cks-cid kr Kftvr SUPERSTITION
3+- - G 6-14, ..r-Fairairmor CITY,
L'"' .4... a/
C,r( WilagNalla STATE, MANOR
X /6111 i Au
Lr ZIP
s' 60',-) ,,,I-L 5- Z-t BEING
e5.c L
V* gNIIMMIM / .
_u: 63S-16-1 - - DEVELOPED
1.11.111 WM= 5—a-z).011. °' S-26
---- al
MACS MEM 11121P111 MOW InEEMIIIII MUM 1111=511 DATE THE
Millai NMEINNINUMFAr IMMIBUIRM.2 EXPANSION
suesinmenfrio
m E' , il/ g ,,, OF
d eini2_ os
I SUPERSTITION
A,14(.%
().--- ivi NIS t. 0 NAME
Alt, 0 MANOR. WEDOINGZAND
,c,c:c,r- LL.-E- ,_---,(--. t
' .,r.,_,1 INTO THIS
A 2 John Lisa
ACRE EXPANSION Burns Burns RECEPTION
(480) HALL
4150 Lvsy ii,-eo WEDDING WILL PETITION (480)560-4390 '720-7535 1220 N WITH
- - ó- PHONE (Call Signal
IMIESINFEEN - binairAidikrACM 6 id4- 0 t---- PARK INCLUDE IN or (Cali or Butte IMMACULATE
IIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIMNIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIINIII 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111=11101111111111111111•111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111 MIIMIIMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIM 111111111111111101111111.11111111111111.1111111111=11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111.01111111111111111111111111111.11111 111111111111.111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3-1-ii,o / %-t -7( NUMBER AND THE Text) Text) www.sunerstitionntanor.com (480)279-3906 Rd
0 .lc 3 S A 2 4 SUPPORT — Mesa
`11111MiiIIINEMIIIIIIngilera ; ACRE ACRE Az VIEWS
P 6 85207 OF
22 "is' e:a5 )A PARKING LOT OF lohn@sunerstitionmanor.com —lisa@superstitiontnanor.com THE
i 4040 Ir'rc - ( 0 JUST
N. r. lr I -, WEST SUPERSTITION
lliNIEN1=11161. 7 • ' rm .- ' .3 FACILITY.
("-\- "4. es (-- tp OF
1 ADDRESS, MOUNTAINS
et- - i• itt .° SUPERSTITION
hi "1-e...--x - a CITY,
•
e'-ii &ok. STATE, MANOR
nrset
ZIP
t'3- crx BEING
ZP i
7 17p DEVELOPED
.--7---6 MIMI
-s
7-3 21`) tis1 7,2,9 -uz-f Ar 17-1 17;0
5-
, •
/ q- 1-14/14 DATE THE
/1 ( - 14
EXPANSION
, A .s. A I
• . I vIt(W VI,/ s Jnoil.,. kiel i-NCI-N OF
11 , - (5116,52e.i+ VW-R--
''' V.)
Nat 1-- 4 .,Vi • CO Cg i'l SUPERSTITION
"StA35, f-, ' eif &. a ..- R2
t' A. e 4... Zirffra '' . Q NAME WEDDING
= f •%- MANOR.
If . '
t) ALI, 11,,i2,-e^ INTO THIS AND
e-r— A 2 John Lisa
ACRE EXPANSION Burns Burns RECEPTION
(480) (480) HALL ,...4ve,f,,deeeeevot
14170 52o-2 ,02.,.. 6 9 ,..., ‘..00. 9 WEDDING WILL PETITION 560-4390 720-7535 1220 N WITH
05 .0 uce.7Lez,t rir k • - PHONE Signal
Vn fe-cto(t--01%, LI Z57-5-''.9 27-- (&).3 S 7 Z-7- 19-% --101- ittf64R-51-k3 14.- PARK INCLUDE IN (Call or (Call Butte IMMACULATE
Li CI ,-(1q NUMBER AND Text) or Text) www,suuerstitionmanor.eom (480)279-3906 Rd
cite— cfi 611042 ,6,Lc-7 8710i -50 ina -CM* 44ke z_ A THE - Mesa
-W 3 , i 2 4 SUPPORT Az VIEWS
t ACRE ACRE 85207 OF
%In .323G iq logs ` ••-/ .20s PARKING LOT OF lohnAsunerstitionmanor.ann -lisa@superstitionmanor.com THE .../r&neat
b c tu,(06,;/ toc 1752 q t b JUST
&/Sif V1/41, crto . yls--Ai iii lv, i. c SUPERSTITION
jp4v241.c5t.„) AA/roe-LP FACILITY. WEST
U ne4nee i:6,12(itxci rl CrtS•0- OF
lm: .. ierjeefi .,13•v) ii-140'1- MOUNTAINS
,../ 5 St-- t(6/-4_41r 6 114 ADDRESS,
DR_ fe,1" I TY SUPERSTITION
p i R.c1wioerli s+ _. i'C"‘41‘. LA)
6---Cluviif- 6 I pctiti .)ierrct_ litt,y_ )'` Megyi., 1 CITY,
-e.det..wsf.t Aff- 5-1--,5e_ rtarriel y
14 At? Ad e#1.2 697 STATE, MANOR
irall A,444../z VI,.5-ek, .1_,,- aliv_ndo-0 - it 7I40eag ZIP
G-D BEING
9/fr-' 9)11-, ed.- fa-q_3 EA-Kei.ace A Z. • .5-42.0s-•
rV5.... Me_ A 42,4
Al, F-C/ f3 • E. 172.-------- DEVELOPED
6/1611,e, al.i "3 ELCGSO teie__ 6,Z
.5016' .)
, '
7,97. 2)-0 251 :4)r,
Iffr
THE
BratEEN DATE
EXPANSION
1"-e-r . gasinummiantm IIlk OF
c-., .4,
k. 4,1.4:6-1
.,)-- SUPERSTITION
kit
PIT Ri,JL W.21101#1LIMIIIMIPX1611311MISSito
'
,i, ME
OP 4 , MANOR. WEDDING
INTO THIS LAND
A 2 John Lisa
ACRE EXPANSION Burns Burns RECEPTION
(480) (480)
,,,f Lek? q`,:6 WEDDING PETITION 1220 HALL
- WILL 560-4390 720-7535 N WITH
- .c.'" ---c0; ce64(1- 9 - PHONE Signal
6, PARK INCLUDE (Call (Call
IN or or Butte %/MACULATE
—t NUMBER AND Text) Text) wism.superstitionnianor.com (480)279-3906 Rd
t 4tez(7-- A THE — Mesa
0 2 4 SUPPORT Az VIEWS
ACRE ACRE 85207 OF
„Id LOT OF iohnasuperstitionmanor.cont —lisa@superstitionmanor.com THE
r PARKING
. JUST
SUPERSTITION
... FACILITY. WEST
E t.,fe OF
5— rmmo ADDRESS, MOUNTAINS
c-..., A k.tiNIMINAINIBMNIrt SUPERSTITION
' ,.._ 0
c_... Am - CITY,
,N
e 1
0 STATE, MANOR
4,0
if,A-it) ZIP
BEING
. A 0.
• DEVELOPED
,:±-
,• .s.
THE
ATE
EXPANSION
i
i ' .Jrni i ...e. OF
0 "
4
,,,
.411 4 SUPERSTITION
,,,,:z.._
NAME
MANOR. WEDDING
INTO THIS d'ND
A John Lisa
2 RECEPTION
ACRE EXPANSION Burns Burns
(480) (480) HALL
6 1220
14,- taln. WEDDING WILL PETITION 560-4390 720-7535 N WITH
- 0'1-71 —
:;,. ti PHONE Signal
- liC 7 r PARK (Call (Call
ih - Sg"'" z 23 c0..4 INCLUDE IN or or Butte IMMACULATE
k 4 / —re 1 i NUMBER AND Text) Text) www.sunerstitionmanor.eom (480)279-3906 Rd
it LI: fl.i.- 67 A THE —
CO i (0 ' 2 4 SUPPORT Mesa VIEWS
.5 Az
ACRE ACRE OF
i/ 76 85207
-79z. ZPrZ-3 6,3 e r LOT OF ohnAsunerstitionmanor.com —lisa@superstilionmanor.com THE
gl-fi PARKING
g S t A JUST
- A/ .r. Air SUPERSTITION
S
AL ' '., .5-/Aitoir / FACILITY. WEST
r....
Lie C A OF
- 1 ,...._ A- MOUNTAINS
4 A 6-6, ADDRESS,
Y--• • -4 ./ SUPERSTMON
N. r (SI
_ CITY
A.,- A .1
e CAle STATE MANOR
7 -, a
- . ZIP
‘‘. ,'et Jr BEING
.fs-e/ 3- f1.7__
Zalla
,
2 DEVELOPED
t '34-6-7
c-,
js s66- 25'1 '2,55 15'1-
412TRY *—Z- THE
DATE
1
IIIIMIMIM 'iC1Ml.t'I1CW EXPANSION
AIMPAINIPMAIAINW L,kI • -v--A-..,- OF
I P
-, ,-.1,-
et- SUPERSTITION
i
-.a. _ A Pr -'t NAME
24,t---- MANOR. WEDDING
I -civ
INTO THIS SAND
A 2 John Lisa
ACRE EXPANSION Burns Burns RECEPTION
(480) (480)
HALL
.4 .60_2_7 , ife.0 . 0 WEDDING WILL PETITION 560-4390 720-7535 1220 N
2- VIISV-1 `` PHONE Signal VVITH
--1. Li MR PARK INCLUDE (Call (Call
v_p_plo Ire'''. IN or or Butte
, ) t,fi,,_csf, (.7J--- 1____44 NUMBER AND Text) Text) vvww.superstitionmanor.com (480)279-3906 Rd IMMACULATE
2.9 Fir . , A THE —
y 31 )--3 1 1E 2 4 SUPPORT Mesa
1 I ACRE ACRE Az VIEWS
_ _ 54 RP 85207 OF
4r--a LOT OF iohnsuperstitionnutnor.com —lisa@snperstitionmanor.cont THE
• _.I '1 .v1= PARKING
1 /74P,Cmcfair.r JUST
a 1 t -,/ efOr,-- I SUPERS11TION
r FACILITY. WEST
4 Winig OF
RILIMMIIMEMBIrf ..., 4 .LA--- I Cre)--""f- MOUNTAINS
ADDRESS,
.,, , .., i,. SUPERSTITION
Li,-- a.t_Ltd_.) /61)61-17 . CITY,
C-/e6X7`Rei ii
1 - STATE MANOR
It.ffiri A i A2rainge
, . ZIP
. i I k i 1,4 BEING
53 ,sro 4- . ir •frf L
071,0 - A pi 2- DEVELOPED
vn-wa. :(7// A e,'-r•-•
"yy.escL-.-
#1-
_1 Z
260
3-
3/-/ DATE THE
Li
EXPANSION
6-
0 9 1-01AJLIL OF
P-01
13E
hie RGSE SUPERSTITION
11)
Ole ii) NAME
k MANOR. WEDDING
C:.
/1) INTO THIS SAND
A 2 John Lisa
ACRE EXPANSION Burns Burns RECEPTION
(480) (480)
Aire? , i WEDDING PETITION 1220 HALL
85- WILL 560-4390 720-7535 N WITH
'7h, 6 3 PHONE PARK INCLUDE (Call (Call Signal
ti IN or or Butte IMMACULATE
-NES- NUMBER AND Text) Text) www.sunerstitionmanor.cont (480)279-3906 Rd
-9eDGD-- A THE — Mesa
2 4 SUPPORT VIEWS
, ACRE ACRE Az OF
, LOT -11sa@superslitionnanor.com 85207 THE
J/57 z3Z0 PARKING OF ioluasunerstitionmanor.com
JUST
N, N. SUPERSTITION
/' c A FACILITY. WEST
'7 aor OF
-EA MOUNTAINS
l' ct ADDRESS,
74
, (2ctl- SUPERSTITION
CITY,
ine_5'../ ot
Estv STATE, MANOR
ZIP
f, BEING
I
as- DEVELOPED
z07
3 3-3
-3J / DATE
(go
()a('
/
He )-:),e,
Nciee w d NAME
c._11, WEDDINGZAND
semi s- e )
,I,-' Citizen John Lisa
Burns Burns RECEPTION
(480) (480)
1220 HALL
e 1--)to- Participation 560-4390 720-7535 N WITH
-- PHONE (Call (Call Signal
2/0 -716 or or Butte IMMACULATE
.--- NUMBER Text) Text) wvvw.sunerstitionnianor.com (480)279-3906 Rd
'=74w12 —96,6z- Meeting — Mesa
Az VIEVVS
85207 OF
Sign johnasuperstitiontnanor.com —lisa@superstitionmanor.com THE
//c,, //,--.7 in
SUPERSTITION
Ai N, Sheet
iin-i I 0
-rh. 1—t4 ADDRESS, MOUNTAINS
-
SZe
CrlY,
Mg 1112S
STATE,
A
,/ ZIP
I/2-- .2_,
.--,S- -
'":..5---,c2.,r, D )-6
g
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Hugh Gleaves <hugh_gleaves@hotmail.com >
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 9:29 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Subject: Superstition Manor
Dear Raymond,
Briefly - I'm sure you're very busy - I'm a relatively new resident here (10709 East Hil!view St) who's opposed
to the requested amendment to the SUP already granted to John Burns with respect to Superstition Manor,
I'm unfamiliar with the process for expressing and filing objections but have expressed my opposition in emails
to Maricopa county a couple of months ago, I don't really know if these are taken into consideration or not,
again I'm very unfamiliar with the machinations of this process.
Below you'll see an e-mail chain that I was included in today, you'll also see Donald's (who lives close to me)
concern that opinions of non-residents have been solicited by Mr Burns in pursuit of his goal, I don't fully
understand the details but if this is true I'd be surprised but I wanted to bring it to your attention and ask your
assurance that such opinions have no bearing on any decision to grant or deny the requested amendment?
For the record my primary objection is the request that Superstition Manor be permitted to host up to 500
guests, with activities extending until 01:00 each day and permission to do this approx once every three
weeks, I find it astonishing that anyone would even consider doing this in such a beautiful and serene setting
especially when people have purchased homes here on the assumption it is a residentially zoned area.
Imagine for a moment that the original SUP was being submitted and that these permissions were being
sought? would it have ever been granted? I don't know, but it is helpful to consider it that way and ask how
such a request would have been evaluated had it been requested at the outset.
If Mr Burns' business is successful enough to expand then its success has already been established and the
current SUP is fulfilling its purpose for him. Should he wish to expand his business as he does then surely the
ethical thing to do here is seek either an alternative or an additional location which is already zoned
appropriately?
I'm sure there are plenty of options for making such investments and there are commercially zoned areas that
would truly benefit from such investment, but asking residents to adapt yet again and tolerate possibly
declining home values, greater numbers of people, longer business hours, increased traffic and so on only
seems to show a rapacious contempt for those residents.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Hugh Gleaves
1
Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
From: Bakers <flybakair@cox.net >
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 7:30 AM
To: Raymond Banker - PLANDEVX
Cc: Superstition Manor
Subject: CASE#: Z2014012-Superstition Manor
Mr. Banker,
I own the the 2 acres directly north and contiguous with John Burns Superstition Manor property. I am away
on business and unable to attend the hearing this morning. My wife and i fully support Mr. Burns request to
amend the Special Use Permit, Superstition Manor and the surrounding grounds are an attractive event
center. Well maintained, tastefully done with many trees and plants that beautify the area. We are in favor of
his request and want to convey this message to Planning & Zoning Commission regarding CASE # Z2014012.
Thank you,
Allen Baker
Property owner 220-04-013J
1