FY16 TENTATIVE BUDGET.PDF

Maricopa ty FY 2O1eu1aiive Budget
I MA I ICOPA
I COUNTY
May 18, 2015
Sandi Wilson, Deputy County Manager Cynthia Goel iI eputy Budget Director
Brian Hushek, Deputy Budget Director -- Tina Allen, ISM et Administrator ebne"
Executive Summary
Steve Chucri
District 2 Supervisor
Board Chairman
Clint Hickman
District 4
Supervisor
EMI
1

FY 2016 Tentative Budget
Overview
7,1
Adopted to Revised Budget
(millions)
Adopted Budget: $2,211.1
Grants and IGA's Countywide 10.9
REVISED BUDGET: $2,222.0
Revised Budget includes adjustments
approved by the Board throughout the fiscal
year.
2

FY 2016 Net Variance to the
FY 2015 Revised Budget
(millions)
FY 2015 FY 2016 (Increase)/
Revised Tentative Decrease
Total County $2,222.0 $2,234.4 $(12.4)
Total Operating 1,719.3 1,771.8 (52.5)
Total Non Recurring 502.7 462.6 40.1
Total General Fund 1,255.0 1,274.4 (19.4)
General Fund Operating 1,123.8 1,182.9 (59.1)
General Fund Non Recurring 131.2 91.5 39.7
q17,1
FY 2016 Tentative Budget
Sources of Funds: $2,234,405,833
Fund Balances
Other./ Permits, Patient 16.24%
Intergovernmental Grants & --- -----\\_Revenue, & Charges Fees, Fines
9.78% 11.69%
gz•-,
3

FY 2016 Tentative Budget
Uses of Funds: $2,234 7405,833
Health and Sanitation Welfare
22.90%
7 litiRS)
4

Budget Guidelines and Priorities
• Adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 7,
2015
• Develop a sustainable, structurally-balanced budget
• All departments must submit within their threshold
• Requests for new funding must be approved by BOS
• ZBB departments will complete decision packages
• The base budget will continue to restore operating
contingency
• No new capital or technology will be reviewed until
reserves decisions are made
• Increases will be evaluated for their impact on the
County's Expenditure Limitation
Budget Guidelines and Priorities
• Ten Departments submitted a Zero-Based Budget
Detention Fund
Sheriff's Office
Correctional Health Services
— Adult Probation
— Juvenile Probation
— Justice System Planning and Information
— ICJIS
— OET
All Funds
— Facilities Management
— Maricopa County Education Service Agency (MCESA)
— Animal Care and Control
5

Major Budget Challenges
• Maintaining structural balance in All Funds
• Low Growth in Sales Taxes, Vehicle License Taxes, Jail
Taxes, and Property Tax Assessment Growth
• Continued reduction of Special Revenue and Grant Funds
has placed added burden on the General Fund
• Prop 117 resulted in suppressed assessed valuation on
existing property eliminating the market-driven approach
• PSPRS increases placed significant strain on the budget
• Detention Fund structural imbalance
• Melendres cost increases are difficult to fund or predict
• Reestablishing Cash Reserves to adequate levels
II
Structurally Balanced Budget
Definition:
Reoccurring
revenues meet or A
nit
exceed reoccurring
expenditures —
over the economic
cycle
6

Prop 117
• Effective for budget year FY 2016
• Single valuation source for all taxes
— No longer will have secondary valuations for
taxing purposes
• Appreciation limited to the lesser of actual
growth or 5%
• Economic growth will no longer influence
net assessed values to the extent
experienced in the past
Retirement and Benefits
• Double digit growth in retirement rates
—$10.3 million increase in costs to the General
and Detention Funds in FY 2016
— Substantial unfunded liabilities in retirement
plans
• Benefits Trust Fund reserves declining
— FY 2016 General and Detention Funds
contributions to health benefits increasing by
$11.4 million
14
7

Employer Retirement
Rate Changes
01M1171171M1117 IfiMP MOO Rate Change % Change
11.60% 11.47% -0.13% -1.12%
39.66% 48.83% 9.17% 23.12%
13.45% 16.25% 2.80% 20.82%
16.12% 19.95% 3.83% 23.76%
23.50% 23.50% 0.00% 0.00%
15
Estimated Unfunded Liabilities
;MT Unfunded Funding
Liability at Ratio at
6/30/2014 6/30/2014
Maricopa County Specific Plans
PSPRS 235,074,082 44.5%
CORP 151,999,578 57.3%
County Attorney Investigators 6,858,326 38.7%
Park Rangers 775,504 68.6%
State-wide Plan
PORP 221,431,155 59.1%
8

Benefits
Benefits Trust Fund Balance
$50 $45
$43
$40 $38
$30 4-
$21
$20 $15
$10 -
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015* FY 2016"
•Forecasled MA x1.11 2 1 2005 11c-rhert& Ho-Ways Flablay L,-1 F Y FY 2015 2016
17 rtit) r
OUICY
Detention Fund
Structural Balance
• Detention Fund has been out of structural
balance since FY 2014.
• Revenue growth is not keeping pace with
expenditure increases due to increase in
services as well as increase in costs, especially
retirement benefits.
• To achieve structural balance in FY 2016, a $19
infusion from the General Fund is necessary.
• Long range forecast indicate this trend will
continue.
9

Detention Fund
Structural Balance without General
Fund Subsidy
......
55u $49.25
PM $33.90 39.42 532.57
$.313 $30.42 $28.79
$20
310
-5 $0 -50.06 .
528 — -$18.96
PIP 24.78 30713
540 -$36.94
FY 2000 Pf 2099 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2023 FY 2014 FY 2013 . FY 2015.• 2017". FY 2018• Fr •• 2019 re . "
• Forecast: Recommended: ••• Proiedim
iI
MCSO Judgment Order
• In October 2013, the United States District Court for
the District of Arizona issued a Judgment Order in
the Melendres v. Arpaio.
• The Judgment Order stated requirements which
MCSO must follow in order to comply with Courts
ruling.
• In addition, it required a court appointed monitor.
• Costs incurred in FY 2014 associated with the order
totaled $3,754,272.
— $3,000,484 by MCSO
— $753,788 for the monitor and other related costs
AIJ TV'S
10

MCSO Judgment Order
• The FY 2015 budget contains over $17 million for the order.
— $14.5 million at MCSO
— $ 2.8 million for the monitor and other related costs
• FY 2016 Tentative budget includes $23.8 million associated with
the order.
— $14.4 million for MCSO
• Includes the reallocation of 24 positions from the General
Fund operating budget
• Other changes include increases to overtime and annual
maintenance for the body camera system.
— $ 3 million for the monitor and related costs
— $ 6.4 million in contingency (operating and one-time).
Note: The above excludes legal costs for defense and plaintiff.
Reserves
% of 2-month Target Level*
100%
89% 89% 88%
54% 55%
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Two months of prior year operating budget
11

Econometric Perspective
"Many things are impacting economic
growth and people can still be optimistic
about our longer term future. However,
some of the current problems will take a
while to be resolved and budgetary caution
is still the recommended path." ow
Elliott D. Pollack and Company AgAtai
April 2015 Elliott D. Pollack
CurtipRny
Nti
12

Economic Development
• Greater Phoenix Economic Council $573,675
— Regional Marketing and Promotion
— Industry Prospecting
— Promote Economic Development Cooperation
• Greater Phoenix Convention and Visitors Bureau $222,431
— Attract Conventions, Conferences and Meetings
— Marketing and Communication
— Leisure Travel Promotion
— Visitor Service Center
• Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce $146,805
— Phoenix Forward
• Industry Councils
• Business Retention and Expansion
• Industry Intelligence
• Training and Collaboration
Economic Development
Greater Phoenix Economic Council
• Regional Prospects and Locates - identify and
develop new prospects
— 201 prospects YTD; 22 locates Greater Phoeni
ECONOMIC COUNCIL
• Business Attraction & Competitiveness - Community
Partnership Program
— GPEC has met with nine different communities YTD and will
meet with all 22 by end of year
• Marketing & Communication - Ambassador Program
— 12 events FY2015 YTD;
732 Ambassadors attended
• Maricopa Competes Website
— Is operational
13

Super Bowl Impact
• Super Bowl visitors boosted spending in
the Valley by double digits for restaurants,
bars and hotels
• Ninety-five percent of the Valley's hotel
rooms were filled on the eve of the Super
Bowl
Economic Development
Greater Phoenix Convention
and Visitors Bureau
• Super Bowl and Pro Bowl
— Occupancy rate average was over 91%
— Average Daily Rate was up 144% from same
time last year
• College Football Playoff Game in 2016
• NCAA Final Four in 2017
• • Visit Phoenix publication -
VISITPHOENE
14

Economic Development
Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce
Establish Industry Council Focus Groups
— Transportation and Logistics
— Health Care
— Bioscience GREATER cHAMBLKOF PHOENIX COMMERCE
FT IRRS
— Advanced Business and Financial Services
Develop Charter Documents
Establish Shared Intelligence System with
Partners
• Establish Reporting System
• Develop and Maintain a Dedicated Website
29 :irgfi
Recovery Detail
• Consumer confidence improving
• Unemployment rate declining
• Housing prices rebounding
• U.S. dollar is strong
• Inflation remains low
• People are spending
• Businesses are investing
Source: HUM a Pollack &Company, Apil 2015
15

Primary Levy
$492.23 $ 92.22
$490
$470 $477.57 $471.19
$463.49
$450 $4,1277
2 $430 $430,02 $425 11
!A!$410
398,73
$390
$370 $371.22
$350
$339.88
$330
N(5 4) NC
(f' ri2
4%.
471 1)
"".
16

Combined County Tax Bill History
111=1 Primary Tax Flood Control LihraryTax Combined County
Bill Tax Bill Bill Tax Bill
2005 $131.37 $23.31 $5.73 $160,41
2006 $141.86 $26.06 $6.41 $174.33
2007 $145.66 $25.49 $6,31 $177.45
2008 $156.58 $29.28 $7.47 $193.33
2009 $167.56 $30.01 $7.75 $205.31
2010 $174,50 $26.36 $6.81 $207.66
2011 $154.47 $22.16 $6.13 $182.75
2012 $154.47 $22.16 $6.13 $182.75
2013 $137.72 $19.76 $5.46 $162.94
2014 $130.63 $14.21 $4.47 $149.32
2015 $146.09 $16.65 $6.65 $169.39
2016 $157.97 $18.48 $6.45 $182.90
Median HorneValues: Primary Library Flood
FY 2015 $110,600 $119,600 $119,600
FY 2016 $116,078 $116,078 $116,078
t474.9 $
Maximum Levy vs. Actual
$678
$625
$se
Maricopa County
$531
$550 Tax Levy vs. Levy Limit $518 FY 2016: $157M
Betow Maxtroum Levy
$471
$400
2
025
$750
$175
er17'
$100 I 7 777--- 7- , • .
041. 0° fk4' e 4,4 ° e 024' Y.k& ç48 crk° 04' 446" 0:4' 061 i.":# ck.'1*
17

Other Revenue Trends
Combined General Fund
Operating Sources
$1,225 $1,204
$1,183
$ 1,1 75
$1,170
$1,157 '11
$1,1 25
$1,123
2 $1,075 $1,082
O
$1,056 $1,065 1,056
$1 ,058
2 $1,025 • $1,034
$1,036
$975
$925 I . . . , .
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*
'Tentative
18

State Shared Sales Tax
(millions)
$575.0 $571
$500.0 •
$458 • $461 $- 470
MICE
$425.0
6419
$395
$398 ' 400 45
REM
$358 ' $366
'61 Cib tZte' tsq, tIN N4 <V ,4
'Forecast Values from Elliott D. Pollack and Co., April 2015
Tentative Budget
Vehicle License Tax
(millions)
$160.0
$156
$150.0 - $15
$144 $144
$140.0 OHMla
c $130.0
0
$120.0
$110.0
$100.0 4--
,<6 ci
fk Cf-k 4A O N ON ck's 0k.( 0 0
"Forecast Values from Elliott ID. Pollack and Co., April 2015
" Tentative Budget
38 t-7 ,1
9

Jail Excise Tax
$170.0 $170
(millions)
$162
$160.0
$154
$1500 $145 $146
$120.0
$11a0
' Forecast Values from Etliott D. Pollack and Co., April 2015
• Tentative Budget
Department Budgets
Standing Budget
ac.)
Revenue
Oversight Mandates
..;)
Unfunded Programs
Process
03 Federal
2 0

Justice System &
Correctional Health
Detention Fund
National Commission on
Correctional Health Care
Detention Fund
Operating Revenue and Expenditures
$380
S360
Ssca
USES —II—SOURC-ES
'Forecast; "Recommended Budget
ri
21

Adult Probation
Year-end Pretrial Electronic Monitoring
750 707 733
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Adult Probation
The Detention Fund budget increased as a
result of:
• Allocation of administration costs from the
General Fund
• Staffing increases in the areas of:
— Prison Re-entry (3)
— Intensive Probation (7)
— Drug Court (2)
• Electronic Monitoring Equipment
Non recurring funding for
equipment for new positions.
22

•
Juvenile Detention
500
P.
450 1-432
e, 403
400
2 350
a_
0, 303 285
259
2, 250 4
209
c 200 103
171
.13
5 150
o.
5 100
C 50
8
FY 06 FY 07 FY DO FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 YTO FY
• Avg Dolly Detention Pop. 15
T711
Juvenile Probation
The overall Detention Fund budget is
decreasing.
• A reduction from personnel savings and other
personnel cost allowed the department to
absorb:
— Community Based Alternatives to Secure
Placement
— Electronic Health Record Maintenance
— Retirement Increases
23

Jail Population
120,000
100,000
430,000
50,000 • Ilookings
• Releases
40,000
20,000
2011 gfM 2013 2014
Jail Population
Average Daily Papu!akin —4—Average Length of Stay (Rar
8,5011 — — 29
8,000 —
— 27
7,500 Days
— 25 in
7,000 —
Stay
a 6,500 — 23 Of
0
6,000 21 Length
5,590 — Avg
19
5,000 —
I 17
4,500
4,000 — 15
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Y713
24

Sheriff's Office
• The baseline budget increased due to the change
in retirement rates.
• Decreases in the budget from personnel savings
were in excess of the following other increased
areas:
- Overtime
- Laundry, janitorial and food service supplies
- Jail intelligence lease
- Staffing for:
• Information Management System Unit (3)
• Victim Notification Unit (3)
• Sexually Violent Persons Unit (2)
• Criminal Intelligence Analysts (4)
• Non recurring funding was provided in the
Detention Fund for:
- Interactive Voice Response System
- Kitchen Equipment
25

Correctional Health Services
Detention Fund
• Base operating budget increased largely due to
increased pharmaceutical costs
• Graves v. Arpaio
- Annualization of 9 new positions and increased
inmate medical transport for compliance with
Amended Judgment.
IFIC National Commission on
- - Correctional Health Care
14474,.it
MEN
26

Sheriff's Office
Baseline budget increased for change to retirement rates
and risk management charges.
The FY 2016 General Fund budget includes:
• Decreases from:
— Personnel Savings tAkEtImn,r. _
—Shift of 24 positions to the
Melendres Operating Budget
• Offset by increases for:
—Overtime and Payroll Changes
— IT Repairs and Maintenance and Broadband
Access
—Grant Shortfalls
EU" ,
Sheriff's Office
FY 2016 Budget includes:
• General Fund Non Recurring Expenditures:
—Camera Security System
— Records Management System
Both are carryforward from FY 2015
otr
27

Adult Probation
Standard Probation
End of Year Caseload
15000 14876
14500 - 1
14652
14000 -
3753
13500 -
13511
13000 -
12500 -
FY 2013 Actual FY 2014 Actual FY 2015 FY 2016
Forecast* Forecast*
*OMB Forecast
trIftl
Adult Probation
The General Fund operating budget decreasing
overall due to:
• Decreases from:
— Allocation of administrative cost to the Detention
Fund.
• Offset by an Increase for:
— Additional staff in the following areas:
• Sex Offender (4)
• Domestic Violence (2)
• Standard Probation (12)
— Retirement rate increase
Non Recurring funds provided
for equipment for new positions.
1k17:1
28

Juvenile Probation Caseloads
600 5900
4500
62 500
4,000
3,500
2 400
324 3,000
2,751 o
trr.
,..Fr 300 235 2,500 I
oseil
234 2,0061 1,0 401 2,2.
• 2,009
'to' 250
1,509 -E
2- CO
1,000
too
F 500
LA'
FY 08 FY 07 FY 98 FY 09 FY10 FY 11 FY 12 FY15 FY 14 YTD FY
15
tilnlenskre Probation - Monthly Avera ge ....Standard Probation - Monthly Average
!CUE
Juvenile Probation
The General Fund Budget decreased by 2.2%
• Increases for:
—Pre-placement Services
—Special Revenue Fund Shortfalls
//
—Retirement Rate Increases
• Offset by Decreases in:
—Personnel Savings
29

Superior Court
Average Monthly Case Processing
14,080
12,000 /61.12,6%] 1,791
-a 10,859 10,397
10,000
§
8,000 • I
&
Cases 0.0001 I
Pending 4,000
2,000 0.5%
60 70 70 i 461 • 701 0.0%
FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 00 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 YID FY 15
AcDve PerdIng Inverlory Trials ConVeled Trta I Rale I
59
Superior Court
FY 2016 General Fund budget is a net
decrease from:
• Increases for:
— Two additional Initial Appearance Commissioners
and staff
— Parent Conference Reports, Interpreter Contract and
Court Security Equipment Maintenance
• Offset by Decreases in:
— Retirement Contribution Rate
— Personnel Savings
60
30

Superior Court
FY 2016 General Fund Non Recurring
Funding for:
— Disaster Recovery Equipment
— "For the Record" Equipment
— Case Management System
Continuation
— Start-up for
Initial Appearance Courts
Clerk of Superior Court
• FY 2016 General Fund Budget includes
increases for:
— Fill The Gap Fund Allocation
— 4.0 FTE for Initial Appearance Courts
— General Fund fee revenue declining -
• General Fund Non Recurring Non Project
— RFR Project Carry Forward
— Additional Contingency in Non Departmental for RFR
— Start up for Initial Appearance Court staff
• Special Revenue Fund receipts are expected
to decline in FY 2016
62
31

Justice Court Filings
500,000 • Orders of Protection /
450,000 Harassment Iniunctions Against
400,000 • Other Civil
350,000
300,000 - Eviction Actions
250,000
200,000 • Small Claims
150,000
100,000 II • I, Misdemeanor
50,000 7
— • Civil Traffic
'PT
,f) DUI & Other Criminal
>- Traffic
i°47,1,1#
Justice Courts
• General Fund Operating Budget
relatively unchanged. Includes:
— Decrease in Risk Management and Retirement
Charges
— Decrease in General Fund Revenue
• General Fund Non Recurring
— Electronic Document Management System
1
32

MCAO Criminal Caseload /
Prosecutor Retention
60,000 100% —iSubmitissis
95%
5%000 90%
50,000 85%
00% General Percent of Fund
45,000 75% Prosecutor Positions Filled
70%
40,000 65% Submittals
35,000 60%
55%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015* 50% 'Forecast
Calendar Year
County Attorney
Department Request submitted over Baseline
Request included funding for 26 additional
positions
— Few prosecutors and mainly support staff
Funded through increase in Personnel Savings
and Special Revenue operating funds and fund
balance
66 P44
33

Public Defense
Dependency History
Public Defense Dependency History
4IP New Dependency Case Assignments —ExpendLtures
LI,11.1 D7..1.1
8.000 -,
$30001
NIKO
41
4,000 $25.11M
2,000 i
$20.0M
0,000 •
•
AI • $15.01,4
8.030 mall hi. —
5,000 • • • $11).otol
4 ,000
1
$5.0m
2,000
•
$0.0i0
FV07 FY08 PM Fyia [1111 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Pro] MIS Ree
rfi
Public Defense Capital Trial
Open Case History
Ial Average Cases Open mnnthiy —Expentiltures
120 $25.0M
100
$20.0M
$3.5.13M
saAmpuedx3
$3.0.GM
402
$5.0M
202
$0.0ro
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Proi FY16 Rec
34

Public Defense System
Significant caseload growth in nearly all
areas of representation
Operating budget increase primarily due to:
— Dependency Representation
• Parental Dependency
• Juvenile Guardian ad [item
• Child Dependency
— Adult Criminal Representation
• Capital Representation
• Capital Post-Conviction Relief
• Non Capital Felony Representation
General Government & Health
Care Programs
35

Health Care Programs
• $2,4M increase in Arnold v Sam n mental health
contribution
• $3.1M increase in base ALTCS contribution
• $320K reduction in AHCCCS contribution
• $1.1M decrease in the cost share for
mandated payment to Arizona State Hospitals
for Sexually Violent Persons
Education Service Agency
Participated in ZBB for all funds
• General Fund Operating Budget remained
flat from their adjusted baseline.
• Maximized Special Revenue Funds.
• Juvenile Transition Program:
— 3 month continuation of pilot while developing
Interdepartmental
Agreement on program
goals and outcomes.
— Contingency set aside
for remaining 9 months
if agreement is reached
tZri.
36

Assessor
• Funding for Expansion of Assessment Analyst
(ESR1) to review 50,000 more parcels per year
— Eliminated 15 positions to absorb expansion of
the ESR1 Pilot Project in Operating Budget
• The Assessor's Office will continue the MARS
Project with an FY 2019 completion goal
eirli[rt Orrojec-r
"Light. Ye,ar
Recorder
• Seven kiosks: Surprise-NW Library, Fountain Hills
Library, Anthem-North Valley Library, White Tanks
Branch Library and Queen Creek Branch Library,
adding this year Goodyear and Sun City; with an eighth
in process at Paradise Valley Library
• Goal of 15 kiosks by the end of FY 2017
R,1[10.0. $,170,000 IRecardlngsper Yearj
1.200,000
1,130,000
1,01,000
1,1150,000
2,11:1006
g040DO 1 17 tfa,1 Pr VII FY2014 rianO•
'Foreeaut " Tentative Midget
37

Elections
• Continued funding for the Elections Cycle
• State impact of $1.9M for loss of revenue
from the State for Presidential Preference
Primary Election
Treasurer
• $9 Billion in receipts; $10 Billion in disbursements
• $13 Million Earned by Portfolio Investments
• $2.3 Million in Elderly Assistance Funds Distributed
• Continued funding for replacement of the
Treasurer's IT System
38

Animal Care and Control
Ad Hoc Task Force Recommendations
• Hire additional staff.
• Start countywide mass media marketing campaign
focused on the benefits of dog licensing.
• Additional kennel space.
• Develop other satellite adoption sites.
• Consider fee increases and a mandatory micro-
chipping program.
• New shelter for East valley needed.
D $500,000 has been set aside in General fund
Contingency for Shelter Operations
Enterprise Technology
Fund 100 — Operating
• Additional Cyber Security Staff
Fund 100 — Major Maintenance — Operating
• Major Maintenance — Phoenix 10 Maintenance
• Major Maintenance — CGI 3x Maintenance
• Major Maintenance — CGI 3x Connectivity
ri]
39

Enterprise Technology
Fund 100 Non-Recurring
• Advantage 2x Hosting
• VMVVare
• Content Management System — Web
• Cyber Security Request
• Major Maintenance — Enterprise Data Center Request
• Major Maintenance — Cyber Security
• Major Maintenance — Telephony
Fund 255 Non -Recurring
• CHS Zone H Access Controls
61 1
40

FY 2016 Use of Capital Funds
$277,339,748
CuKure &Recreation
0.26%
106hWeys a Ste
34.16%_ General Guyarrtnent
26.22%
ublic Safety
39.35%
El
FY 2014 Long-Term Debt Per Person
Comparison To National Benchmarks
Long-Term Debt Per Person
$1,400 $1,294
$1,200
$1,200
$1,000
$765 $807 n
$809 $696 $709
$623 5644
$600 $538
$400 $313
$209
$65
$-
e 4 4,0 •e e
00 4 'cz e c.> 0
‘-vq`
Source: Maricopa County LTD for Governmental Activitles "Note 14 — Long Term
Liabilities°, (Benchmark CAFRs & InternalAudit Analysis)
82 VW()
41

Courts Master Plan Update
• Courts Master Plan
— Study conducted by Archetikton, Steinmann
Facility Development Consultants and Dr.
Dan Straub was completed in the summer of
2014.
• Phase I
— Build out of the East Court 8th floor.
— Southwest Justice Courts Project will start in
FY 2016 (4 existing JP Courts + 1 expansion)
t
Jails Master Plan Update
• Jails Master Plan
— Study conducted by Arrington Watkins
Architects was completed in the summer of
2014.
• Phase I
— Design and construction of a new jail funded
in FY 2016 to replace the old Durango Jail.
• Will provide flexible open plan for intake without
additional transfers and relocations that add time
and cost to processing, and serves the needs of
pre-sentencing.
84
42

CIP Projects Awaiting Funding
• Animal Care & Control — Southeast & MASH Unit Relocation
West • Security at Buckeye Hills
• Adult Probation — Black Canyon, • K9 Kennels
Northport, Southport & Buckeye • Remote Site Network Refresh
• Emergency Operations Center Procurement Build out
• Additional Downtown Land Acquisitions. Vulture Mountain
• New Building to Replace Leased • Juvenile Court Building Demolition
Facilities
• Courts Master Plan
• Parking Garage for New Building
• Jails Master Plan
• Durango Campus Drainage Solution
• Constituent Relationship Mgmt System
• Durango Campus FCI Corrections
• OET 10-Yr Equipment Refresh
• Extended Cooling Loop at Durango
• MCSO Avondale Substation
• Plaza Demolition/Remodel/
Redesign/FAJD • MCSO SWAT Major Crimes Building
APS Power to Buckeye Hills Range • MCSO Crime Lab upgrades
and Shoot House
Over $1.2 Billion of unfunded projects
ER
RIM
43

FY 2016 Accomplishments
Reach the reserves goal of 2 months of operating 13'
Continue the ZBB process g
Provided necessary funding for criminal justice issues sy
Increased funding for Melendres court order El
New Courtrooms ei
Funding for many significant technology projects ES
Detention Fund Structural Imbalance GI'
Jail — Phase I ef
Partial funding for Benefits funding increases
Fully-funded Vehicle Replacement 1:4
Expenditure Limitation Relief El
Special Revenue fund operational deficits
Permanent funding for State shifts
Funding for Pay for Performance and Market Issues
LE
FY 2016 Long-Term
Accomplishments
• Jail - Phase 1 ig
• Detention Fund Structural Imbalance Ef
• Strategic Reserve Levels Met er
• Flood Control Long-term CIP Funding (partial)
• Capital Funding Strategy
• Large Technology Projects Continued
• Additional Court Orders — Melendres/D0J/
Graves
• Expenditure Limitation Permanent Adjustment
• Jail and Court Master Plans Completion
88
44

Budget Calendar — Remaining Dates
May 18 Tentative Budget Adoption
May 28 ATRA Presentation
June 22 Final Budget Adoption
August 17 Property Tax Levy Adoption
89
45


Budget Calendar — Remaining Dates
May 18 Tentative Budget Adoption
May 28 ATRA Presentation
June 22 Final Budget Adoption
August 17 Property Tax Levy Adoption
89
45

Maricopa County
ITRRARI DISTRICT
Maricopa County FY 2016
Special Districts
Tentative Budget
May 18, 2015
Sandi Wilson, Deputy County Manager
ikro ..Brian Hushek, Deputy Budget Director
STAL.11 i rIcTRECT
46

Flood Control District Highlights
- Overall expenditures of $98,840,393
- Levy increased by $5,851,804
▪ FY 2016 CIP $66.0 Million
• Five-year CIP projected to be $210 Million
Flood Control District Levy History
$80.000 $7074 $74.998
$70.000
$60.000 $68.019
$64.842'
$50.000 -$48.512
$40.000 $39.843 843.660
$30.000
$20.000
$10.01)0
0 (e) 0 () O 0 'I 0 41 0 (z) 0 0 0 0 0 N. f te0 K. 0 K. co
ri t rt,
94

Flood Control District Levy
& Rate History
$130.000
$70.000
$60.000
$50.000
$40,000
$30.000
$20.000
$10.000
0 0 0 P 0 0 P 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 0 N
9 , ' I. i/ rt.
• FCD Levy
Maricopa County
LIBRA1V4RICT
1gr
iZEAP•PMAZE.PfSCOVER
48

Library District Highlights
arimmok
Overall expenditures of $29,489,719
Levy decreased by $253,523
Materials assistance programs are funded through
operating revenues
All county libraries now operate on the Deweyless
system
Maricopa County
LIBIZAW IgTRICT
,
afAkCiaitaisidvEg
49

Stadium District Highlights
• Overall expenditures of $10,712,934
- Includes $4 Million for Phase V concrete repairs
• Car Rental Surcharge increasing slightly (0.5%)
50