ATTACHMENT A.PDF

Maricopa County FY 2016 Tentative Budget
May 18, 2015
Sandi Wilson, Deputy County Manager Cynthia Goelz, Deputy Budget Director
Brian Hushek, Deputy Budget Director Tina Allen, Budget Administrator

Executive Summary
Steve Chucri
Denny Barney District 2 Supervisor Steve Gallardo
District 1 Board Chairman District 5
Supervisor Supervisor
Andy Kunasek Clint Hickman
District 3 District 4
Supervisor Supervisor
2

FY 2016 Tentative Budget
Overview & Challenges
2015 vs. 2016
3

FY 2015 Adopted to Revised Budget
(millions)
Adopted Budget $2,211.1
Grants and IGA’s Countywide 10.9
REVISED BUDGET $2,222.0
Revised Budget includes adjustments
approved by the Board throughout the fiscal
year.
4

FY 2016 Net Variance to the
FY 2015 Revised Budget
(millions)
FY 2015 FY 2016 (Increase)/
Revised Tentative Decrease
Total County $2,222.0 $2,234.4 $(12.4)
Total Operating 1,719.3 1,771.8 (52.5)
Total Non Recurring 502.7 462.6 40.1
Total General Fund 1,255.0 1,274.4 (19.4)
General Fund Operating 1,123.8 1,182.9 (59.1)
General Fund Non Recurring 131.2 91.5 39.7
5

FY 2016 Tentative Budget
Sources of Funds: $2,234,405,833
State Shared Sales
22.02% Property Taxes,
Penalties and Interest
Miscellaneous & 21.33%
Interest
1.43%
Highway User
Revenues
4.39%
Sales Taxes
6.54%
State Shared Vehicle
License Taxes Fund Balances
6.58% Other Permits, Patient 16.24%
Intergovernmental & Revenue, Fees, Fines
Grants & Charges
9.78% 11.69%
6

FY 2016 Tentative Budget
Uses of Funds: $2,234,405,833
Culture and
Recreation
0.58%
Education Public Safety
1.39% 51.83%
Highways and
Streets
6.95%
General
Government
16.35%
Health Welfare
and Sanitation
22.90%
7

8

Budget Guidelines and Priorities
• Adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 7, 2015.
• Develop a sustainable, structurally-balanced budget.
• All departments must submit within their threshold.
• Requests for new funding must be approved by BOS.
• Zero-Based Budget departments will complete decision
packages.
• The base budget will continue to restore operating
contingency.
• No new capital or technology will be reviewed until
reserves decisions are made.
• Increases will be evaluated for their impact on the County’s
Expenditure Limitation.
9

Budget Guidelines and Priorities
• Ten Departments submitted a Zero-Based Budget:
Detention Fund
– Sheriff’s Office
– Correctional Health Services
– Adult Probation
– Juvenile Probation
– Justice System Planning and Information
– Integrated Criminal Justice Information system (ICJIS)
– Office of Enterprise Technology (OET)
All Funds
– Facilities Management
– Maricopa County Education Service Agency (MCESA)
– Animal Care and Control
10

Major Budget Challenges
• Maintaining structural balance in All Funds.
• Low Growth in Sales Taxes, Vehicle License Taxes, Jail
Taxes, and Property Tax Assessment Growth.
• Continued reduction of Special Revenue and Grant Funds
has placed added burden on the General Fund.
• Prop 117 resulted in suppressed assessed valuation on
existing property eliminating the market-driven approach.
• Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS)
increases placed significant strain on the budget.
• Detention Fund structural imbalance.
• Melendres cost increases are difficult to fund or predict.
• Reestablishing Cash Reserves to adequate levels.
11

Structurally Balanced Budget
Definition:
Reoccurring
revenues meet
or exceed
reoccurring
expenditures –
over the
economic cycle
12

Prop 117
• Effective for budget year FY 2016.
• Single valuation source for all taxes:
– No longer will have secondary valuations for
taxing purposes
• Appreciation limited to the lesser of actual
growth or 5%.
• Economic growth will no longer influence
net assessed values to the extent
experienced in the past.
13

Retirement and Benefits
• Retirement rates are straining the budget:
– $10.3 million increase in costs to the General
and Detention Funds in FY 2016
– Substantial unfunded liabilities in retirement
plans
• Benefits Trust Fund reserves declining:
– FY 2016 General and Detention Funds
contributions to health benefits increasing by
$11.4 million
14

Employer Retirement
Rate Changes
Retirement % of FY 2015 FY 2016 Rate %
Plan Staff in Rate Rate Change Change
Plan
ASRS and LTD 68% 11.60% 11.47% -0.13% -1.12%
PSPRS 16% 39.66% 48.83% 9.17% 23.12%
CORP 1% 13.45% 16.25% 2.80% 20.82%
PORP 10% 16.12% 19.95% 3.83% 23.76%
EORP 5% 23.50% 23.50% 0.00% 0.00%
15

Estimated Unfunded Liabilities
Plan Unfunded Funding Ratio
Liability at at 6/30/2014
6/30/2014
Maricopa County Specific Plans
PSPRS $235,074,082 44.5%
CORP 151,999,578 57.3%
County Attorney Investigators 6,858,325 38.7%
Park Rangers 775,504 68.6%
State-wide Plan
PORP $221,431,155 59.1%
16

Detention Fund
Structural Balance
• Maricopa County asked for 1/3¢ and received
approval from the legislature for 1/5¢ in sales taxes.
• Detention Fund has been out of structural balance
since FY 2014.
• Revenue growth is not keeping pace with
expenditure increases due to increase in services
as well as increase in costs, especially retirement
benefits.
• To achieve structural balance in FY 2016, a $19
infusion from the General Fund is necessary.
• Long range forecast indicate this trend will continue.
17

Detention Fund
Structural Balance without General
Fund Subsidy
$60
$50 $49.25
$40 $39.42
$33.90 $32.57
$30 $28.70
$30.42
$20
$10
-$0.06
Millions $0
-$4.05
-$10
-$18.96
-$20
-$24.78
-$30 -$30.43
-$40
-$36.94
-$50
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015* FY 2016** FY FY FY
2017*** 2018*** 2019***
*Forecast ** Recommended *** Projection
18

MCSO Judgment Order
• In October 2013, the United States District Court for
the District of Arizona issued a Judgment Order in
Melendres v. Arpaio.
• The Judgment Order stated requirements which
MCSO must follow in order to comply with Courts
ruling.
• In addition, it required a court appointed monitor.
• Costs incurred in FY 2014 associated with the order
totaled $3,754,272:
– $3,000,484 by MCSO
– $753,788 for the monitor and other related costs
19

MCSO Judgment Order
• The FY 2015 budget contains over $17 million for the order:
– $14.5 million at MCSO
– $2.8 million for the monitor and other related costs
• FY 2016 Tentative budget includes $23.8 million associated with
the order:
– $14.4 million for MCSO:
• Includes the reallocation of 24 positions from the General
Fund operating budget
• Other changes include increases to overtime and annual
maintenance for the body camera system
– $3 million for the monitor and related costs
– $6.4 million in contingency (operating and one-time)
Note: The above excludes legal costs for defense and plaintiff.
20

State Budget Impacts
Prior Years FY 2015 FY 2016 TOTALS
Mandated Contribution $ 103,668,300 $ - $ - $ 103,668,300
Sweep ALTCS Refunds 11,078,831 - - 11,078,831
HURF Diversion to DPS 42,264,339 4,492,963 5,095,023 51,852,325
HURF Diversion to MVD 6,662,102 - - 6,662,102
Reduce, Eliminate Lottery Revenue 1,248,860 249,772 249,772 1,748,404
SVP Payments 16,700,000 2,106,649 2,106,649 20,913,298
100% Superior Court Judges Salaries 36,050,316 9,155,758 9,354,345 54,560,419
Assessor - DOR 846,000 282,000 282,000 1,410,000
Capital PCR - ongoing 722,630 447,723 447,723 1,618,076
Capital PCR - start up 64,962 - - 64,962
Reduction in State-Shared Sales Tax for
Utilities used in Manufacturing - 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
Reduction in Jail Excise Tax for Utilities
used in Manufacturing - 600,000 600,000 1,200,000
Juvenile Corrections Cost Shift - 7,166,033 7,166,033
DOR Cost Shift - 4,030,498 4,030,498
Presidential Preference Election - 1,912,221 1,912,221
$ 219,306,340 $ 18,334,865 $ 32,244,264 $ 269,885,469
21

Economic Development
22

Econometric Perspective
“Many things are impacting economic growth and
people can still be optimistic about our longer term
future. However, some of the current problems will
take a while to be resolved and budgetary caution is
still the recommended path.”
Elliott D. Pollack and Company
April 2015
23

Economic Development
• Greater Phoenix Economic Council $573,675
– Regional Marketing and Promotion
– Industry Prospecting
– Promote Economic Development Cooperation
• Greater Phoenix Convention and Visitors Bureau $222,431
– Attract Conventions, Conferences and Meetings
– Marketing and Communication
– Leisure Travel Promotion
– Visitor Service Center
• Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce $146,805
– Phoenix Forward
Industry Councils
Business Retention and Expansion
Industry Intelligence
Training and Collaboration
24

Economic Development
Greater Phoenix Economic Council
• Regional Prospects and Locates - Identify and
develop new prospects:
– 201 prospects YTD; 22 locates
• Business Attraction & Competitiveness - Community
Partnership Program:
– GPEC has met with nine different communities YTD and will
meet with all 22 by end of year
• Marketing & Communication - Ambassador Program
– 12 events FY2015 YTD:
732 Ambassadors attended
• Maricopa Competes Website
– Is operational
25

Economic Development
Greater Phoenix Convention
and Visitors Bureau
• Super Bowl and Pro Bowl:
– Occupancy rate average was over 91%
– Average Daily Rate was up 144% from same
time last year
• College Football Playoff Game in 2016.
• NCAA Final Four in 2017.
• Visit Phoenix publication.
26

Super Bowl Impact
• Super Bowl visitors boosted spending in
the Valley by double digits for restaurants,
bars and hotels.
• Ninety-five percent of the Valley's hotel
rooms were filled on the eve of the Super
Bowl.
27

Economic Development
Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce
• Establish Industry Council Focus Groups:
– Transportation and Logistics
– Health Care
– Bioscience
– Advanced Business and Financial Services
• Develop Charter Documents.
• Establish Shared Intelligence System with
Partners.
• Establish Reporting System.
• Develop and Maintain a Dedicated Website.
28

Recovery Detail
• Consumer confidence improving.
• Unemployment rate declining.
• Housing prices rebounding.
• U.S. dollar is strong.
• Inflation remains low.
• People are spending.
• Businesses are investing.
Source: Elliott D. Pollack & Company, April 2015
29

Property Taxes
30

Primary Levy
$492.23 $492.22
$490
$477.57 $471.19
$470
$463.49
$450 $442.76
$430 $430.02 $425.11
Millions $410
$398.73 $409.78
$390
$370 $371.22
$350
$339.88
$330
31

Combined County Tax Bill History
$250.00
$205.31 $207.66
$200.00 $193.33
$182.75 $182.75 $182.90
$174.33 $177.45
$169.39
$160.41 $162.94
$149.32
$150.00
$100.00
$50.00
$0.00
FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
32

Maximum Levy vs. Actual Levy
$628
$625
$606
$581
Maricopa County $558
$538
$550
Tax Levy vs. Levy Limit $518
FY 2016: $157 M
Below Maximum Levy
$492 $471
$475
$478
$443
$425
$400 $410
Millions
$325
$250
$175
Maximum Levy Actual Levy
$100
33

Other Revenue Trends
34

Combined General Fund
Operating Sources
$1,225
$1,204
$1,183
$1,175
$1,170
$1,157
$1,125
$1,123
$1,075 $1,082
Millions $1,056 $1,065 $1,056
$1,058
$1,025 $1,034
$1,036
$975
$933
$925
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*
*Tentative
35

State Shared Sales Tax
(millions)
$575.0 $571
$545
$519
$500.0 $492
$480
$458 $461 $470
Millions
$444
$425.0
$419
$395
$398 400.45
$385
$358 $366
$350.0
*Forecast Values from Elliott D. Pollack and Co., April 2015
** Tentative Budget
36

Vehicle License Tax
(millions)
$160.0
$156
$150.0 $150
$144 $144
$140.0 $139 $138
$138
$130.0 $132
Millions $126 $126
$123
$120.0
$118
$116 $116
113.36
$110.0 $114
$100.0
*Forecast Values from Elliott D. Pollack and Co., April 2015
** Tentative Budget
37

Jail Excise Tax
$170.0 $170
(millions)
$162
$160.0
$154
$150.0 $145 $146
$140.0
$138 $138 $139
Millions $133
$130.0
$125
$120.0 $119
$117 $118
$112
$110.0
$107 $107
$100.0
*Forecast Values from Elliott D. Pollack and Co., April 2015
** Tentative Budget
38

Department Budgets
39

Justice System &
Correctional Health
Detention Fund
40

Detention Fund
Operating Revenue and Expenditures
$380
$360 FY 2016:
$18,957,014
Subsidy
$340
from
General
Millions Fund to
Achieve
$320
Structural
Balance
$300
$280
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015* FY 2016**
USES SOURCES
*Forecast **Recommended Budget
41

Adult Probation
Year-end Pretrial Electronic Monitoring
750
707 733
700 712
650
600
550
500
450 460
414
400
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
42

Adult Probation
The Detention Fund budget increased as a
result of:
• Allocation of administration costs from the
General Fund.
• Staffing increases in the areas of:
– Prison Re-entry (3)
– Intensive Probation (7)
– Drug Court (2)
• Electronic Monitoring Equipment.
Non recurring funding for
equipment for new positions.
43

Juvenile Detention
500
450 432
Caseload
403
400
Probation 350 332
300 285
258
Intensive
250 234 231
209
&
200 183
171
Population 150
100
Detention
50
-
FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 YTD FY
15
Avg Daily Detention Pop.
44

Juvenile Probation
The overall Detention Fund budget is
decreasing.
• A reduction from personnel savings and other
personnel cost allowed the department to
absorb:
– Community Based Alternatives to Secure
Placement
– Electronic Health Record Maintenance
– Retirement Increases
45

Jail Population
Average Daily Population Average Length of Stay (Rel)*
8,500 29
8,000
27
Days
7,500
25 in
7,000 Stay
23 of
6,500
ADP Length
6,000 21
Avg
5,500
19
5,000
17
4,500
4,000 15
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD
46

Sheriff’s Office
• The baseline budget increased due to the change
in retirement rates.
• Decreases in the budget from personnel savings
were in excess of the following other increased
areas:
- Overtime
- Laundry, janitorial and food service supplies
- Jail intelligence lease
- Staffing for:
Information Management System Unit (3)
Victim Notification Unit (3)
Sexually Violent Persons Unit (2)
Criminal Intelligence Analysts (4)
47

Sheriff’s Office
• Non recurring funding was provided in the
Detention Fund for:
- Interactive Voice Response System
- Kitchen Equipment
- Laundry Equipment
48

Correctional Health Services
Detention Fund
• Base operating budget increased largely due to
increased pharmaceutical costs.
• Graves v. Arpaio:
- Annualization of 9 new positions and increased
inmate medical transport for compliance with
Amended Judgment
49

Justice System
General Fund
50

Sheriff’s Office
Baseline budget increased for change to retirement rates
and risk management charges.
The FY 2016 General Fund budget includes:
• Decreases from:
– Personnel Savings
– Shift of 24 positions to the
Melendres Operating Budget
• Offset by increases for:
– Overtime and Payroll Changes
– IT Repairs and Maintenance and Broadband
Access
– Grant Shortfalls
51

Sheriff’s Office
FY 2016 Budget includes:
• General Fund Non Recurring Expenditures:
– Camera Security System
– Records Management System
Both are carryforward from FY 2015.
52

Adult Probation
Standard Probation
End of Year Caseload
15,000
14,876
14,500
14,652
14,000
13,753
13,500
13,511
13,000
12,500
FY 2013 Actual FY 2014 Actual FY 2015 FY 2016
Forecast* Forecast*
*OMB Forecast
53

Adult Probation
The General Fund operating budget decreasing
overall due to:
• Decreases from:
– Allocation of administrative cost to the Detention
Fund
• Offset by an Increase for:
– Additional staff in the following areas:
• Sex Offender (4)
• Domestic Violence (2)
• Standard Probation (12)
– Retirement rate increase
Non Recurring funds provided
for equipment for new positions.
54

Juvenile Probation Caseloads
600 5,000
527 4,570
519 4,500
Caseload 502 4,289
500 4,284 4,047
4,055 459 4,000
Probation 3,510 3,500 Caseload
400 383
3,000
324 2,791
Intensive
300 283 2,500 Probation
2,381
& 234 2,086 1,946
2,000
234
200
Population 206 1,500 Standard
1,000
100
Detention
500
- -
FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 YTD FY
15
Intensive Probation - Monthly Average Standard Probation - Monthly Average
55

Juvenile Probation
The General Fund Budget decreased by 2.2%.
• Increases for:
– Pre-placement Services
– Special Revenue Fund Shortfalls
– Retirement Rate Increases
• Offset by Decreases in:
– Personnel Savings
56

Superior Court
Average Monthly Case Processing
14,000 3.0%
11,606
12,000 11,791 11,893 11,593
11,339 11,413 2.5%
10,859 2.6% 10,902
10,397 2.6% 10,124
Completed 10,000 2.3%
2.2% 2.2% 2.0%
2.1% 2.1%
8,000
Trials 1.8% 1.8% Rate
1.7%
1.5%
&
Trial
6,000
Cases
1.0%
4,000
Pending
0.5%
2,000
- 0.0%
FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 YTD FY 15
Active Pending Inventory Trial Rate
57

Superior Court
FY 2016 General Fund budget is a net
decrease from:
• Increases for:
– Two additional Initial Appearance Commissioners
and staff
– Parent Conference Reports, Interpreter Contract and
Court Security Equipment Maintenance
• Offset by Decreases in:
– Retirement Contribution Rate
– Personnel Savings
58

Superior Court
FY 2016 General Fund Non Recurring
Funding for:
– Disaster Recovery Equipment
– “For the Record” Equipment
– Case Management System Continuation
– Start-up for Initial
Appearance Courts
59

Clerk of Superior Court
• FY 2016 General Fund Budget includes
increases for:
– Fill The Gap Fund Allocation
– 4.0 FTE for Initial Appearance Courts
– General Fund fee revenue declining
• General Fund Non Recurring Non Project:
– Restitution, Fines and Reimbursement (RFR) Project
Carry Forward
– Additional Contingency in Non Departmental for RFR
– Start up for Initial Appearance Court staff
• Special Revenue Fund receipts are expected
to decline in FY 2016.
60

Justice Court Filings
Orders of Protection /
500,000
Injunctions Against
450,000 Harassment
400,000 Other Civil
350,000
300,000 Eviction Actions
250,000
200,000 Small Claims
150,000
100,000 Misdemeanor
50,000
- Civil Traffic
06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
(Proj)
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
15 DUI & Other Criminal
FY Traffic
61

Justice Courts
• General Fund Operating Budget
relatively unchanged. Includes:
– Decrease in Risk Management and Retirement
Charges
– Decrease in General Fund Revenue
• General Fund Non Recurring:
– Electronic Document Management System
62

MCAO Criminal Caseload /
Prosecutor Retention
Submittals Retention
63

County Attorney
• Department Request submitted over Baseline.
• Request included funding for 26 additional
positions:
– Few prosecutors and mainly support staff
• Funded through increase in Personnel Savings
and Special Revenue operating funds and fund
balance.
64

Public Defense
Dependency History
Public Defense Dependency History
New Dependency Case Assignments Expenditures
20,000 $35.0M
18,000
$30.0M
16,000
14,000 $25.0M
Assignments
12,000
$20.0M Expenditures
10,000
$15.0M
Case 8,000
6,000 $10.0M
4,000
$5.0M
2,000
0 $0.0M
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Proj FY16 Rec
65

Public Defense Capital Trial
Open Case History
Average Cases Open Monthly Expenditures
120 $25.0M
100
$20.0M
Cases 80
$15.0M
Expenditures
Open
60
$10.0M
40
$5.0M
20
0 $0.0M
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Proj FY16 Rec
66

Public Defense System
• Significant caseload growth in nearly all
areas of representation.
• Operating budget increase primarily due to:
– Dependency Representation:
• Parental Dependency
• Juvenile Guardian ad Litem
• Child Dependency
– Adult Criminal Representation:
• Capital Representation
• Capital Post-Conviction Relief
• Non Capital Felony Representation
67

General Government & Health
Care Programs
68

Health Care Programs
• $2.4M increase in Arnold v Sarn mental health
contribution.
• $3.1M increase in base Arizona Long Term
Care System (ALTCS) contribution.
• $320K reduction in Arizona Health Care Cost
Containment system (AHCCCS) contribution.
• $1.1M decrease in the cost share for
mandated payment to Arizona State Hospitals
for Sexually Violent Persons.
69

Education Service Agency
• Participated in ZBB for all funds.
• General Fund Operating Budget remained
flat from their adjusted baseline.
• Maximized Special Revenue Funds.
• Juvenile Transition Program:
– 3 month continuation of pilot while developing
Interdepartmental
Agreement on program
goals and outcomes
– Contingency set aside
for remaining 9 months
if agreement is reached
70

Assessor
• Funding for Expansion of Assessment Analyst
(ESRI) to review 50,000 more parcels per year.
– Eliminated 15 positions to absorb expansion of
the ESRI Pilot Project in Operating Budget
• The Assessor’s Office will continue the CAMA
Project with an FY 2019 completion goal.
71

Recorder
• The eighth Recorder’s Kiosk is being implemented at
Paradise Valley Library.
• Partnership with Environmental Services and Air Quality.
• Three more Kiosks planned for FY 2016.
• Goal of 15 kiosks by the end of FY 2017.
* Forecast ** Tentative Budget
72

Elections
• Continued funding for the Elections Cycle.
• State impact of $1.9M for loss of revenue
from the State for Presidential Preference
Primary Election.
73

Treasurer
• $9.8 Billion in receipts; $10.0 Billion in disbursements.
• $13.6 Million Earned by Portfolio Investments.
• $2.3 Million in Elderly Assistance Funds Distributed.
• Continued funding for replacement of the Treasurer’s
IT System.
• Elderly Assistance Fund being used to fund nearly
$7.2 Million in State cost shifts.
74

Animal Care and Control
• Funding has been set aside in General Fund
Contingency for Shelter Operations.
• County Administration will work with Animal Care
and Control to review the recommendations
presented by the Ad Hoc Task Force.
75

Enterprise Technology
Fund 100 – Operating
• Additional Cyber Security Staff (3)
Fund 100 – Major Maintenance – Operating
• Major Maintenance – Phoenix IO Maintenance
• Major Maintenance – CGI 3x Maintenance
• Major Maintenance – CGI 3x Connectivity
76

Enterprise Technology
Fund 100 – Non Recurring
• Advantage 2x Hosting
• VMWare
• Content Management System – Web
• Implement Additional Cyber Security
• Major Maintenance – Enterprise Data Center
• Major Maintenance – Cyber Security
• Major Maintenance – Telephony
Fund 255 – Non Recurring
• CHS Zone H Access Controls
77

Capital Improvements
78

FY 2016 Use of Capital Funds
$277,339,748
79

FY 2014 Long-Term Debt Per Person
Comparison To National Benchmarks
Long-Term Debt Per Person
$1,400 $1,294
$1,200
$1,200
$1,000
$788 $807
$800 $696 $709
$623 $644
$600 $538
$400 $313
$200
$55
$-
Source: Maricopa County LTD for Governmental Activities “Note 14 – Long Term Liabilities”,
(Benchmark CAFRs & Internal Audit Analysis)
80

Courts Master Plan Update
• Courts Master Plan:
– Study was completed in the summer of 2014
• Phase I:
– Build out of 4 courtrooms on the East Court
Building 8th floor
– Southwest Justice Courts Project will start in
FY 2016 (4 existing JP Courts + 1 expansion)
81

Jails Master Plan Update
• Jails Master Plan:
– Study was completed in the summer of 2014
• Phase I:
– Design and construction of a new jail funded
in FY 2016 to replace the old Durango Jail
• Will provide flexible open plan for intake without
additional transfers and relocations that add time
and cost to processing, and serves the needs of
pre-sentencing
82

CIP Projects Awaiting Funding
• Animal Care & Control – Southeast & • MASH Unit Relocation
West • Security at Buckeye Hills
• Adult Probation – Black Canyon, • K9 Kennels
Northport, Southport & Buckeye
• Remote Site Network Refresh
• Emergency Operations Center
• Procurement Build-out
• Additional Downtown Land Acquisitions
• Vulture Mountain
• New Building to Replace Leased
• Juvenile Court Building Demolition
Facilities
• Courts Master Plan
• Parking Garage for New Building
• Jails Master Plan
• Durango Campus Drainage Solution
• Constituent Relationship Mgmt System
• Durango Campus FCI Corrections
• OET 10-Yr Equipment Refresh
• Extended Cooling Loop at Durango
• MCSO Avondale Substation
• Plaza Demolition/Remodel/
Redesign/FAJD • MCSO SWAT Major Crimes Building
• APS Power to Buckeye Hills Range • MCSO Crime Lab upgrades
and Shoot House
Over $1.2 Billion of Unfunded Projects
83

Conclusion & Achievements
84

FY 2016 Accomplishments
Reach the reserves goal of 2 months of operating
Continue the ZBB process
Provided necessary funding for criminal justice issues
Increased funding for Melendres court order
Four New Courtrooms
Funding for many significant technology projects
Detention Fund Structural Balance
Jail – Phase I
Partial funding for Benefits increases
Fully-funded Vehicle Replacement
Expenditure Limitation Relief
Special Revenue fund operational deficits
Permanent funding for State shifts
Funding for Pay for Performance and Market Issues
85

FY 2016 Long-Term
Accomplishments
Jail - Phase 1
Detention Fund Structural Balance
Strategic Reserve Levels Met
Flood Control Long-term CIP Funding (partial)
Capital Funding Strategy
Large Technology Projects Continued
Additional Court Orders – Melendres/DOJ/
Graves
Expenditure Limitation Permanent Adjustment
Jail and Court Master Plans Completion
86

Budget Calendar – Remaining Dates
May 18 Tentative Budget Adoption
May 28 ATRA Presentation
June 22 Final Budget Adoption
August 17 Property Tax Levy Adoption
87