04. 05. CPA2012012 Z2012097 BOS REPORT.PDF

Report to the Board of Supervisors
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Board Hearing Date: February 18, 2015
Case #s/Title: CPA2012012 & Z2012097 – Russell Ranch South
Supervisor District: 4
Applicant/Owner: HilgartWilson / J and A Camelback Property, LLC
Requests: 1. Comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) to change the land
use designation from Large Lot Residential (1-2 d.u./ac.) to
Small Lot Residential (2-5 d.u./ac.) CPA case approval is by
Resolution, attached.
2. Zone change from R1-18 RUPD to R1-10 RUPD and R1-18
RUPD (Residential Unit Plan of Development)
Site Location: Approximately at the northwest corner of 181st Ave. and
Camelback Rd. (in the Glendale area)
Site Size: Approximately 136 acres
County Island Status: Class II (City of Glendale)
Additional
Comments: Staff provided the Commission a memorandum with
attachments that included a summarized total of the
support and opposition received. The applicant proposed
additional conditions to the zoning case to address
discussions held with stakeholders, Savannah and Russell
Ranch Homeowner’s Associations with design considerations
of Russell Ranch South. The Commission voted to include the
additional conditions as part of the zoning case approval.
Staff has calculated the support and opposition received,
and notes that a Super Majority Vote has been triggered.
The trigger is when 20% or more of property owners within a
300’ radius of the subject site, by number and area register
opposition to the case. The opposition received accounts for
60 property owners with an area of 742,499 sq. ft.
The calculations for Russell Ranch are as follows:
20.37% opposed parcel acreage within 300’ buffer
51.28% opposed parcel numbers within the 300’ buffer
February 18, 2015
CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 1 of 7

After the Commission hearing, staff received two additional
letters regarding the project with opposition, and
clarification of the drainage issues addressed during the
Commission hearing with color exhibits.
Commission
Recommendations (two motions – CPA2012012 & Z2012097):
1. On 1/22/15, the Commission voted 7-1 to recommend approval of CPA2012012 subject
to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’:
Provided the following conditions are met:
a. Development and use of the site shall comply with the narrative report entitled,
“Russell Ranch South”, including all exhibits dated revised June 12, 2014, and
stamped received June 13, 2014, except as modified by the following conditions.
b. If the Board takes action to amend or revert/rescind subsequent zoning, this land
use plan shall be considered for amendment.
c. The total number of residential units shall not exceed 333 dwelling units.
d. Not less than 27 acres shall be developed as open space to include
neighborhood park, pocket parks and an internal trail system. At the time of
each preliminary plat submission, the developer shall include a description of the
status, cumulative acreage and proposed amenities.
e. The following Maricopa County Flood Control District (FCD) conditions shall
apply:
1. A Floodplain Use Permit must be obtained from the Floodplain
Management and Services Division of the Flood Control District.
2. Approval of the Conditional Letter of Map Revision by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will be required prior to Flood
Control District recommending approval of the Final Plat.
f. The following State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) condition shall apply:
1. An archeological survey shall be submitted to and approved by the
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office prior to issuance of a grading
permit or approval of a Final Plat. The applicant must contact the state
office prior to initiating disturbance of the site. The applicant shall provide
the Planning and Development Department with written proof of
compliance with this stipulation.
g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval
allows the property owner to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the land
use existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the
failure to comply with any condition of approval, the property shall change to
February 18, 2015
CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 2 of 7

the land use designation that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore,
stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply with any
conditions does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to
use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in
value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to
such revocation. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment enhances the value of
the property above its value as of the date the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment is granted and changing to the prior land use designation results in
the same value of the property as if the Comprehensive Plan Amendment had
never been granted.
2. On 1/22/15, the Commission voted 7-1 to recommend approval of Z2012097 subject to
Conditional Zoning of Chapter 3 Article 304.6 of the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance and subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘y’:
Provided the following conditions are met:
a. Development of the site shall comply with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Russell
Ranch South RUPD Case No. Z2012097“, consisting of one full-size sheet, dated
September 4, 2014, and stamped received September 15, 2014, except as
modified by the following conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Russell Ranch South Residential Unit Plan of Development (RUPD)”,
consisting of 80 pages, dated September 11, 2014, and stamped received
September 15, 2014, except as modified by the following conditions.
c. The zoning approval is conditional per Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance,
Article 304.6, and ARS §11-814. Construction shall commence within five (5) years
from Board of Supervisors approval. The developer of the property shall submit to
the Department a certified statement of compliance prior to the expiration of
any time limits imposed by the Board. If the certified statement of compliance is
not filed or the Development independently determines that the property has
not been improved for the use for which it was conditionally approved, a public
hearing shall be set before the Commission. The findings and recommendation
of the Commission shall be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for public
hearing to determine compliance with the schedule of development, grant an
extension, or cause the property to revert to its former zoning classification.
Notification by registered mail of both the Commission hearing and the Board
hearing shall be sent to the owner and applicant who requested the rezoning.
Notice of public hearing shall be as set forth in Chapter 3, Section 304., Article
304.2.
d. The following R1-10 RUPD standards shall apply (see RUPD table within narrative
report for footnotes):
1. Front Yard: 20’ front loaded garage or 10’ side loaded or livable area of
dwelling unit
2. Side Yard: 5’
3. Rear Yard: 20’
4. Lot Area: 6,875 sq. ft.
February 18, 2015
CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 3 of 7

5. Lot Width: 55’
6. Average Lot Area per Dwelling Unit: 12,500 sq. ft.
7. Lot Coverage: 55%
8. Accessory Buildings – Distance to Side Street on Corner Lots: 10’
e. The following R1-18 RUPD standards shall apply (See RUPD table within narrative
report for footnotes):
1. Front Yard: 20’ front loaded garage or 10’ side loaded or livable area of
dwelling unit
2. Side Yard: 5’
3. Street Side Yard: 10’
4. Rear Yard: 20’
5. Lot Area: 13,500 sq. ft.
6. Lot Width: 100’
7. Lot Coverage: 55%
8. Accessory Buildings – Distance to Side Street on Corner Lots: 10’
f. The following Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)
conditions shall apply:
1. The applicant shall provide a total half-width of right-of-way for the
following roadway:
Camelback Road 65 feet
Perryville Road 65 feet
181st Avenue 30 feet for west side
181st Avenue Minimum 18 feet east side of the monument
line (8’ for additional pavement to make two
lanes/two way road and 10’ for clear zone
distance)
All such dedications shall be in fee and free of all liens and
encumbrances. Prior to acceptance of such dedication, the applicant
shall provide the County an owner’s title insurance policy issued to the
County, the MCDOT environmental checklist and any and all other
requirements as set forth in the “MCDOT Right-of-Way Dedications
Reference Guide”. Until Maricopa County has accepted said dedication,
all responsibilities, including but not limited to maintenance and repair for
the property to be dedicated shall be that of the applicant.
Right-of-Way dedication shall occur within six (6) months of approval of
this request by the Board of Supervisors and prior to zoning clearance.
2. Provide access easement for portions of box culvert structures that’s
outside of the right-of-way limits for MCDOT inspection purposes.
3. Roadway reviews of planning and/or zoning cases are for conceptual
design only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with current
MCDOT Design Standard.
February 18, 2015
CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 4 of 7

4. Based upon the conceptual design nature of the preliminary plat plans
submitted, changes to the site layout and /or a reduction in the number
of building lots may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the
subdivision drainage infrastructure.
5. All interior streets within the proposed development are to be constructed
to minimum County standards.
g. The following Drainage Review conditions shall apply:
1. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and the Maricopa
County Drainage Policies and Standards.
2. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
3. Prior to issuance of any permits for development of the site, the
applicant/property owner shall obtain the necessary encroachment
permits from the Maricopa County Department of Transportation
(MCDOT) for landscaping or other improvements in the right-of-way.
h. The following Flood Control District (FCD) conditions shall apply:
1. A Floodplain Use Permit must be obtained from the Floodplain
Management and Services Division of the Flood Control District.
2. Approval of the Conditional Letter of Map Revision by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will be required prior to Flood
Control District recommending approval of the Final Plat.
j. All outdoor lighting shall conform to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
k. Development of the site shall be in compliance with all applicable Maricopa
County Air Quality rules and regulations.
l. An archeological survey shall be submitted to and approved by the Arizona
State Historic Preservation Office prior to issuance of a grading permit. The
applicant must contact the State office prior to initiating disturbance of the site.
The applicant shall provide the Planning and Development Department with
written proof of compliance with this stipulation.
m. Prior to Final Plat approval, developer(s) and/or builder(s) shall establish
emergency fire protection services, covering all real property contained within
the project area during course of construction and shall obtain a ‘will serve’
February 18, 2015
CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 5 of 7

letter substantiating coverage from the appropriate Fire District, Department or
Company servicing the site.
n. All habitable buildings constructed within this subdivision shall be constructed to
attain a noise reduction level as per ARS § 28-8482(B).
o. Amendments to the site plan and narrative report shall be processed as a
revised application in accordance with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
Article 304.9.
p. Noncompliance with the conditions of approval will be treated as a violation in
accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. Further,
noncompliance of the conditions of approval may be grounds for action in
accordance with Chapter 3 (Conditional Zoning).
q. Non-compliance with the regulations administered by the Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department, Maricopa County Department of
Transportation, Drainage Review Division, Planning and Development
Department, or the Flood Control District of Maricopa County may be grounds
for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa
County Zoning Ordinance.
r. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if
the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with
conditions.
s. There shall be no two (2) story homes along the lots directly adjacent to the
existing platted lots along the southern boundary of the Savannah subdivision.
t. There shall be no roadway extension from the existing 182nd Avenue into the
proposed project.
u. The applicant shall work with the Maricopa County Department of Transportation
to determine if traffic calming features can be incorporated in the development
of the design of 181st Avenue adjacent to the project. The design and approval
shall occur at the approval of the preliminary plat.
v. The applicant shall work with the Maricopa County Drainage staff to determine if
a restrictive gate, drainage feature can be installed at the south end of the
Savannah open space in order to prevent residents from traversing the drainage
area into the Savannah open space.
w. There shall be no view fences along the back yards of the lots facing west
towards the Savannah subdivision.
x. The applicant shall determine if at the time of preliminary plat submittal if an
alternative placement of the southernmost roadway access to 181st Avenue can
be relocated so as not to directly line up with W. Medlock Drive.
February 18, 2015
CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 6 of 7

y. There shall be no two (2) story homes directly adjacent to platted lots within
Russell Ranch.
Presented by: Rachel Applegate, Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Darren Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director
Attachment: 1/22/15 P&Z Packet (68 pages)
1/22/15 P&Z handouts – revised conditions, support/opposition and petitions (99
pages)
Super-Majority Exhibit (1 page)
Resolution (2 pages)
Letters in opposition received after Commission hearing (2 pages)
Letter with clarification on drainage (5 pages)
Development Agreement (21 pages)
Note: 1/22/15 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can
be provided upon request later when available.
February 18, 2015
CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 7 of 7

Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Cases: 1. CPA2012012 – Russell Ranch South
2. Z2012097
Meeting Date: January 22, 2015
Agenda Items: 1. 4
2. 5
Supervisor District: 4
Applicant: HilgartWilson
Owner: J and A Camelback Property, LLC
Requests: 1. Comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) to change the land use
designation from Large Lot Residential (1-2 d.u./ac.) to Small Lot
Residential (2-5 d.u./ac.)
2. Zone change from R1-18 RUPD to R1-10 RUPD and R1-18 RUPD
(Residential Unit Plan of Development)
Site Location: Approximately at the northwest corner of 181st Ave. and
Camelback Rd. (in the Glendale area)
Site Size: Approximately 136 acres
Density: 2.5 d.u./ac.
County Island Status: Class II (City of Glendale)
County Plan: White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan – Large Lot Residential (1-2
d.u./ac.)
Municipal Plan: City of Glendale – Low Density Residential (0-1 d.u./ac.)
Municipal Comments: None received
Support/Opposition: 19 letters in opposition (3 of the 19 are duplicate letters from
property owners)
Recommendations: 1. Approve with conditions
2. Approve (Conditional zoning) with conditions
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 1 of 16

Project Summary:
1. The applicant is requesting a CPA to change the land use designation within the White
Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan from Large Lot Residential (1-2 d.u./ac.) to Small Lot
Residential (2-5 d.u./ac.) on approximately 136 acres. A zone change application
Z2012097 is also being requested to change the R1-18 RUPD (Residential Unit Plan of
Development) zoning to R1-10 RUPD and R1-18 RUPD for Russell Ranch South.
2. The subject site consists of Russell Ranch Unit 4 (previously platted), Unit 5 and Unit 6
which are two vacant parcels located approximately at the northwest corner of 181st
Ave. and Camelback Rd. in the Glendale area (see Figure 1). The subject site is located
adjacent to existing large lot residential to the north with Savannah to the northwest
and Russell Ranch Units 1 and 3 to the northeast. South is property within the City of
Goodyear jurisdiction for residential development – Sedella.
Figure 1.
Aerial photograph of subject site and adjacent land uses.
3. The narrative asserts that the proposed development meets the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment criteria in the following manner:
Whether the amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the Comprehensive
Plan and is not solely for the good or benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a
particular point in time.
The narrative states the project not only considers exiting land uses in the area but the
future planned land uses. Russell Ranch South would provide a more diverse housing
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 2 of 16

product and lot sizes than what exists in the area. The project would include a transition
of land uses from more intense along the west and southwest, with less intense
residential to the northeast and east. The narrative also asserts that the development
would fulfill the requirements of an approved Development Agreement established with
Maricopa County to accommodate stormwater retention which was not properly
retained onsite for Russell Ranch Units 1 – 3. The Development Agreement allows the
developer to include a request to increase densities to resolve an ongoing drainage
issue with the existing subdivisions of Russell Ranch Units 1 – 3.
Whether the amendment will adversely impact all or a portion of the planning area.
A. Altering acceptable land use patterns to the detriment to the plan.
The applicant states at the 2.5 d.u./ac. the request is slightly higher than what is
currently permitted with the Large Lot Residential (1-2 d.u./ac.). The density
increase would provide for a variety of lot sizes, larger open spaces, and
amenities. The applicant states the density would be consistent with and below
the Luke Graduated Density Concept.
B. Requiring public expenditures for large and more expensive public
improvements to roads, sewer, or water systems that are needed to support
planned land uses.
The narrative indicates the off-site infrastructure needed for the project has
already been constructed. The right-of-way for 181st Ave. and a portion of
Camelback Rd. were dedicated with Russell Ranch Phase 4 Final Plat. The water
and wastewater infrastructure extends to the property and would be sized to
provide service for the project. The report indicates that Liberty Utilities is the
wastewater provider for the west half of the project, EPCOR along the east half
and water services will be provided by EPCOR. There are no public expenditures
required to meet traffic needs for the project, or for water and wastewater
needs.
C. Adversely impacting planned uses because of increased traffic.
The narrative indicates the project is a medium density residential project and a
traffic study was prepared. All streets would be sized to carry existing traffic in
addition to Russell Ranch South at an acceptable level of service.
D. Affecting the livability of the area or the health or safety of present and future
residents.
The narrative states the density is slightly higher which would provide for a livable
and healthy community for open spaces, social gathering places and a variety
of quality housing. The project would accommodate the insufficient retention
and drainage issues from Russell Ranch Units 1 – 3. The project would also include
a drainage channel along Camelback Rd. to accommodate offsite drainage
flows. The applicant states the project would provide active open space to
include tot lots, open spaces to play sports, internal trail to encourage walking
and jogging activities.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 3 of 16

E. Adversely impacting the natural environment or scenic quality of the area in
contradiction of the plan.
The report states the project is fallow farmland surrounded by master planned
communities in various stages of development from planned commercial, high-
density residential to developed low-density residential. The report states the
subject site is not considered natural or scenic.
Whether the amendment is consistent with the overall intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
The narrative report states the proposal conforms with the vision and intent of the White
Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan by encouraging responsible growth and development
within the area. The application presents a proposal that would be compatible with the
surrounding area and consistent with the character of the area.
4. The narrative also states that the proposed development meets the following goals and
objectives of the White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan (Note: The applicant’s narrative
report provides details about this project intends to meet these goals and policies):
Land Use Goal L1: Promote efficient land development that is compatible with
adjacent land uses and is well integrated with the transportation system, and is sensitive
to the natural environment.
Land Use Objective L4: Provide for the coexistence of urban and rural land uses.
Growth Area Goal: Promote orderly, timely, and fiscally responsible growth in Maricopa
County.
Cost of Development Goal: Ensure that new development pays its fair and proportional
share of the cost of additional public facility and service needs generated by new
development.
5. The associated zoning case includes a request to rezone the parcels to R1-10 RUPD and
R1-18 RUPD. The zoning district would allow for up to 333 single family residential lots on
four development parcels. The proposed minimum widths of the residential lots would
consist of 55’ wide lots along Camelback Rd., 65’ wide lots along Savannah and 100’
wide lots along Russell Ranch Unit 3 and Savannah. Staff notes there is no preliminary
plat in process at this time. The lotting layout as shown in Figure 2. is conceptual.
6. The applicant states that a Development Agreement entered into with the County in
2011 which addresses outstanding stormwater retention volumes with Russell Ranch
Phases 1, 2 and 3 will allow the applicant to request additional densities with
development of the properties. The applicant conducted an extensive outreach
program and based upon input received the density was reduced from 448 lots to 333,
a reduction of approximately 25.6%. Russell Ranch South consists of Phases 4, 5 and 6 of
the original Russell Ranch project. These phases would be combined and identified as
Russell Ranch South. Figure 2. includes images provided by the applicant with the
original phasing and the proposed conceptual layout for Russell Ranch South.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 4 of 16

Figure 2.
Historical naming of the development parcels of Russell Ranch and proposed
conceptual lotting layout for Russell Ranch South (formerly phases 4, 5 and 6).
7. The applicant states the request would provide a balance of open space while
accommodating the outstanding stormwater retention from the existing Russell Ranch
Units 1, 2 and 3. The applicant states that the existing plats of Russell Ranch include 7%
open space and would provide for a neighborhood park, pocket parks and an internal
trail system to account for 20% of the total gross acreage of Russell Ranch South. The
applicant states the neighborhood park would be constructed with the first phase of
development. Amenities would include tot lots, playgrounds, ramadas, barbeque, and
benches to be identified with the preliminary plat. The development parcels acreage
and percentage of open space are identified below:
Parcel Area Zoning Lot Count Open Open
Space ac. Space %
1 33.97 ac. R1-10 RUPD 97 3.7 10.9%
2 33.53 ac. R1-10 RUPD 72 11.3 33.7%
3 32.69 ac. R1-10 RUPD 95 7.7 23.6%
4 35.44 ac R1-18 RUPD 69 4.4 12.4%
Total 135.6 333 27.1 20.0%
Public Participation Summary:
8. The applicant complied with the requirements for application notification to property
owners within 300’ of the subject site and held two public meetings (February 5, 2013
and April 30, 2014). The applicant states that additional meetings were held with Russell
Ranch and Savannah Homeowners Associations, Fire Service, Police Service, and
individual residents. The additional meetings discussed the reduction in density and
development consultants assisting with the project. Input received from neighbors
related to concerns with property values, additional traffic, density increase from what
is existing in the area, increase in utility services, impact to fire service and lots are too
small.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 5 of 16

9. Staff received 19 letters in opposition (3 of the 19 are duplicate letters from property
owners) indicating the zoning and density do not conform with the existing area plan.
Other responses received indicate the project is not appropriate for the area and the
density of the R1-10 zoning does not conform to the area, potential impacts with
increased traffic, emergency services, and tranquility of lifestyle in the rural area.
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning/Land Use:
10. On-site: R1-18 RUPD / vacant
North: R1-10 RUPD and R1-18 RUPD / large lot residential (Savannah and
Russell Ranch Units 1 and 3)
South: PAD Zoning (City of Goodyear) / vacant (Sedella)
East: Rural-43, R1-18 RUPD / vacant; Russell Ranch Unit 1; Russell Ranch
Wastewater Treatment Facility
West: C-2 CUPD & R-2 RUPD PAD / vacant commercial and vacant land
within Zanjero Trails DMP
Figure 3.
Aerial image of subject site and adjacent residential land uses.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 6 of 16

Figure 4.
Zoning map of subject site and surrounding zoning districts.
Adopted Plans:
11. White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan: The area plan designates the site as Large Lot
Residential (1-2 d.u./a.c).
12. City of Glendale General Plan: The City of Glendale designates the subject site as Low
Density Residential (0-1 d.u./ac.). The City has not provided any comments on the
applications.
Utilities and Services:
13. Water: EPCOR
Wastewater: Liberty Utilities (west half Parcels 1 & 2) EPCOR (east half Parcels 3 &
4)
School District: Litchfield #79, Agua Fria Union High School
Fire: Rural Metro Fire Department
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies:
14. N/A
Staff Analysis:
15. A development agreement was established in 2011 to address the outstanding
stormwater issues related to construction of Russell Ranch Units 1, 2 and 3. The
agreement includes reference to developing a replacement plat and could include a
request for increased densities in the development of the property due to engineering
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 7 of 16

required to address the existing drainage issues. Staff notes that units 1, 2 and 3 were
constructed without completion of the centralized retention area for the project.
16. The applicant is requesting variations to the proposed R1-10 and R1-18 zoning district
standards. The site would include approximately 27 acres as open space which
accounts for approximately 20% of the gross acreage. The applicant states the request
for smaller lots is based upon the need to provide additional open space to
accommodate the drainage and to provide a product that would be viable in the
existing housing market. Show below is the proposed R1-10 RUPD and R1-18 RUPD tables
with the requested variations.
Russell Ranch Proposed Zoning District Development Standards – Z2012097 – R1-10
RUPD (Development Parcels 1, 2 and 3)
Regulation Base Zoning District Proposed Zoning District Regulations (R1-10 RUPD)
Regulations (R1-10)
Height 30’/2 stories 30’/2 stories
Front Yard 20’ 20’ front loaded garage
10’ side loaded garage or livable area of dwelling
unit (1)
Side Yard 7’ 5’
Street-side Yard 10’ 10’
Rear Yard 25’ 20’
Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. 6,875 sq. ft.
Lot Width 80’ 55’
Average Lot Area per 10,000 sq. ft. 12,500 sq. ft.
Dwelling Unit (2)
Lot Coverage 40% (4) 55%
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS (ARTICLE 1106.2) (3)
Building Location Rear and/or Side Rear and/or Side Yard
Yard
Maximum Building Structure 30% 30%
Area within Required Rear
and Side Yard
Side and Rear Setback 3’ 3’
Distance to Side Street on Not less than ½ the 10’
Corner Lots depth of the required
front yard
Building Height 30’/2 stories 30’/2 stories
(1) 20-foot front yard setback for front loaded garage, 10-foot front setback for side loaded garage or
livable area of dwelling unit, provided front loaded garage retains 20-foot minimum setback from
right-of-way. Refer to Appendix G, Typical Setback Exhibit for a depiction of various setback
requirements.
(2) Average Lot Area per Dwelling Unit = total area of lots and open spaces, excluding all public and
private streets, divided by the total number of lots.
(3) Per Article 1106.2 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance, detached accessory buildings and
structures may be built in the required rear yard and/or required side yard per required
development standards.
(4) Updated to Maricopa County 2014 revised standards.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 8 of 16

Russell Ranch Proposed Zoning District Development Standards – Z2012097 R1-18
RUPD (Development Parcel 4)
Regulation Base Zoning District Proposed Zoning District Regulations (R1-18 RUPD)
Regulations (R1-18)
Height 30’/2 stories 30’/2 stories
Front Yard 30’ 20’ front loaded garage
10’ side loaded garage or livable area of dwelling
unit (1)
Side Yard 10’ 5’
Street-side Yard 15’ 10’
Rear Yard 30’ 20’
Lot Area 18,000 sq. ft. 13,500 sq. ft.
Lot Width 120’ 100’
Average Lot Area per 18,000 sq. ft. 18,000 sq. ft.
Dwelling Unit (2)
Lot Coverage 35% (4) 55%
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS (ARTICLE 1106.2) (3)
Building Location Rear and/or Side Rear and/or Side Yard
Yard
Maximum Building Structure 30% 30%
Area within Required Rear
and Side Yard
Side and Rear Setback 3’ 3’
Distance to Side Street on Not less than ½ the 10’
Corner Lots depth of the required
front yard
Building Height 30’/2 stories 30’/2 stories
(1) 20-foot front yard setback for front loaded garage, 10-foot front setback for side loaded garage or
livable area of dwelling unit, provided front loaded garage retains 20-foot minimum setback from
right-of-way. Refer to Appendix G, Typical Setback Exhibit for a depiction of various setback
requirements.
(2) Average Lot Area per Dwelling Unit = total area of lots and open spaces, excluding all public and
private streets, divided by the total number of lots.
(3) Per Article 1106.2 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance, detached accessory buildings and
structures may be built in the required rear yard and/or required side yard per required
development standards.
(4) Updated to Maricopa County 2014 revised standards.
17. Staff notes there are large variations from the base zoning district standards of the R1-10
and R1-18 which the setbacks, minimum lot size and lot widths are comparable to the
R1-6 and R1-10 zoning districts. Shown on the next page are comparisons of the base
standards, the applicant’s proposal, and comparable zoning districts. The R1-10 for
development parcels 1, 2 and 3 include a reduction in minimum lot area of 3,125 sq. ft.,
minimum lot width reduction of 25’, and maximum lot coverage increase of 15%.
Comparing the requested zoning variations, these parcels could be accommodated
with R1-6 RUPD zoning which results in a minimum lot area increase of 875 sq. ft.,
minimum lot width reduction of 5’, and maximum lot coverage increase of 5%.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 9 of 16

Evaluation of the R1-10 and R1-6 Base Zoning District (Parcels 1, 2 and 3)
Base Zoning Proposed Zoning Base Zoning
Regulation District District Regulations Difference in the District Difference in the
Regulations (R1-10 RUPD) R1-10 Regulations (R1-6) R1-6
(R1-10)
Height 30’/2 stories 30’/2 stories - 30’/2 stories -
Front Yard 20’ 20’ front loaded - 20’ -
garage 10’ reduction in 10’ reduction in
10’ side loaded front for side front for side
garage or livable loaded garage or loaded garage or
area of dwelling livable area of livable area of
unit (1) dwelling unit. dwelling unit.
Side Yard 7’ 5’ 2’ reduction 5’ -
Street-side Yard 10’ 10’ - 10’
Rear Yard 25’ 20’ 5’ reduction in 25’ 5’ reduction in
rear yard rear yard
Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. 6,875 sq. ft. 3,125 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. Increase of 875
reduction sq. ft.
Lot Width 80’ 55’ 25’ reduction in 60’ 5’ reduction in
width width
Average Lot Area per 10,000 sq. ft. 12,500 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. 6,500 sq. ft.
Dwelling Unit (2) increase increase
Lot Coverage 40% (4) 55% 15% increase 50% 5% increase
18. The R1-18 for development parcel 4 includes a reduction in lot area of 4,500 sq. ft., lot
width reduction of 20’, and lot coverage increase of 20%. Comparing the requested
zoning variations, the parcel would be accommodated with the R1-10 RUPD zoning
which results in a minimum lot area increase of 3,500 sq. ft., minimum lot width increase
of 20’, and maximum lot coverage increase of 15%.
Evaluation of the R1-18 and R1-10 Base Zoning District (Parcel 4)
Base Zoning Proposed Zoning Base Zoning
Regulation District District Regulations Difference in the District Difference in the
Regulations (R1-18 RUPD) R1-18 Regulations (R1- R1-10
(R1-18) 10)
Height 30’/2 stories 30’/2 stories - 30’/2 stories -
Front Yard 30’ 20’ front loaded 10’ reduction 20’ 10’ reduction
garage 10’ reduction in 10’ reduction in
10’ side loaded front for side front for side
garage or livable loaded garage or loaded garage or
area of dwelling livable area of livable area of
unit (1) dwelling unit. dwelling unit.
Side Yard 10’ 5’ 5’ reduction 7’ 2’ reduction
Street-side Yard 15’ 10’ 5’ reduction 10’ -
Rear Yard 30’ 20’ 10’ reduction 25’ 5’ reduction
Lot Area 18,000 sq. ft. 13,500 sq. ft. 4,500 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 3,500 sq. ft.
reduction increase
Lot Width 120’ 100’ 20’ reduction 80’ 20’ increase
Average Lot Area per 18,000 sq. ft. 18,000 sq. ft. - 10,000 sq. ft. 8,000 sq. ft.
Dwelling Unit (2) increase
Lot Coverage 35% (4) 55% 20% increase 40% (4) 15% increase
19. The subject site is located approximately a mile outside of the 65 Ldn contour. Luke Air
Force Base’s graduated density concept establishes graduated densities in order to
reduce residential concentrations around the base. The subject site is located within a
graduated density which allows for 6 d.u./ac from ½ mile to 1 mile of the 65 Ldn. Luke
Air Force Base issued a letter dated April 22, 2014 which indicates the request is
compatible and consistent with high noise and accident potential of Luke Air Force
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 10 of 16

Base (LAFB). In order to analyze densities, the proposed Small Lot Residential (2–5
d.u./ac.) designation could have a range between 272 to 680 lots. Due to LAFB’s letter
in support of the proposed change in land use designation staff is supportive of the
request to limit density to 2.5 d.u./ac. with a limitation of 333 residential lots which is
below the graduated density concept standards. Figure 5 shown below shows the
subject site in relation to the high noise or accident potential zones of LAFB.
Figure 5.
Russell Ranch South located approximately a mile outside of the 65 LDN.
20. The subject site is within the future municipal planning area of Glendale which has a
land use designation of Low Density Residential (0-1 d.u./ac.). To date, staff has not
received any comments from the City on the request to amend the land use
designation to Small Lot Residential or for the zone change. Staff believes the Small Lot
Residential land use designation is appropriate and consistent with LAFB Graduated
Density Concept. The residential component would be adjacent to existing residential
land uses and existing developments to the north, west and proposed residential to the
south.
21. Staff is supportive of the request to change the land use and the requested zoning.
Development of Russell Ranch South would solve existing drainage concerns with
Russell Ranch Units 1, 2 and 3. Staff notes the City of Glendale did not provide
comments on the change in land use or zone change and reviewing county agencies
have no objections to the requests.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 11 of 16

Recommendations:
22. Staff recommends the Commission motion for approval with conditions “a” – “g” of
CPA2012012 for the following reasons:
• The request meets the criteria identified in the Maricopa County Comprehensive
Plan Amendment Guidelines.
• The proposal is below the Luke Air Force Base Graduated Density Concept at 2.5
d.u./ac where Luke specifies a maximum of 6 d.u./ac.
• Reviewing county agencies have no objections to the request.
• Development of the site will help solve a regional drainage concern.
Provided the following conditions are met:
a. Development and use of the site shall comply with the narrative report entitled,
“Russell Ranch South”, including all exhibits dated revised June 12, 2014, and
stamped received June 13, 2014, except as modified by the following conditions.
b. If the Board takes action to amend or revert/rescind subsequent zoning, this land
use plan shall be considered for amendment.
c. The total number of residential units shall not exceed 333 dwelling units.
d. Not less than 27 acres shall be developed as open space to include
neighborhood park, pocket parks and an internal trail system. At the time of
each preliminary plat submission, the developer shall include a description of the
status, cumulative acreage and proposed amenities.
e. The following Maricopa County Flood Control District (FCD) conditions shall
apply:
1. A Floodplain Use Permit must be obtained from the Floodplain
Management and Services Division of the Flood Control District.
2. Approval of the Conditional Letter of Map Revision by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will be required prior to Flood
Control District recommending approval of the Final Plat.
f. The following State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) condition shall apply:
1. An archeological survey shall be submitted to and approved by the
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office prior to issuance of a grading
permit or approval of a Final Plat. The applicant must contact the state
office prior to initiating disturbance of the site. The applicant shall provide
the Planning and Development Department with written proof of
compliance with this stipulation.
g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval
allows the property owner to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the land
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 12 of 16

use existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the
failure to comply with any condition of approval, the property shall change to
the land use designation that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore,
stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply with any
conditions does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to
use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in
value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to
such revocation. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment enhances the value of
the property above its value as of the date the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment is granted and changing to the prior land use designation results in
the same value of the property as if the Comprehensive Plan Amendment had
never been granted.
23. Staff recommends the Commission motion for approval subject to Conditional Zoning of
Chapter 3 Article 304.6 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance with conditions “a” –
“r” of Z2012097 for the following reasons:
• The zone change is in concert with the proposed CPA2012012 land use category
of Small Lot Residential.
• The proposal is below the Luke Air Force Base Graduated Density Concept at 2.5
d.u./ac where Luke specifies a maximum of 6 d.u./ac.
• Reviewing county agencies have no objections to the request.
Provided the following conditions are met:
a. Development of the site shall comply with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Russell
Ranch South RUPD Case No. Z2012097“, consisting of one full-size sheet, dated
September 4, 2014, and stamped received September 15, 2014, except as
modified by the following conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Russell Ranch South Residential Unit Plan of Development (RUPD)”,
consisting of 80 pages, dated September 11, 2014, and stamped received
September 15, 2014, except as modified by the following conditions.
c. The zoning approval is conditional per Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance,
Article 304.6, and ARS §11-814. Construction shall commence within five (5) years
from Board of Supervisors approval. The developer of the property shall submit to
the Department a certified statement of compliance prior to the expiration of
any time limits imposed by the Board. If the certified statement of compliance is
not filed or the Development independently determines that the property has
not been improved for the use for which it was conditionally approved, a public
hearing shall be set before the Commission. The findings and recommendation
of the Commission shall be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for public
hearing to determine compliance with the schedule of development, grant an
extension, or cause the property to revert to its former zoning classification.
Notification by registered mail of both the Commission hearing and the Board
hearing shall be sent to the owner and applicant who requested the rezoning.
Notice of public hearing shall be as set forth in Chapter 3, Section 304., Article
304.2.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 13 of 16

d. The following R1-10 RUPD standards shall apply (see RUPD table within narrative
report for footnotes):
1. Front Yard: 20’ front loaded garage or 10’ side loaded or livable area of
dwelling unit
2. Side Yard: 5’
3. Rear Yard: 20’
4. Lot Area: 6,875 sq. ft.
5. Lot Width: 55’
6. Average Lot Area per Dwelling Unit: 12,500 sq. ft.
7. Lot Coverage: 55%
8. Accessory Buildings – Distance to Side Street on Corner Lots: 10’
e. The following R1-18 RUPD standards shall apply (See RUPD table within narrative
report for footnotes):
1. Front Yard: 20’ front loaded garage or 10’ side loaded or livable area of
dwelling unit
2. Side Yard: 5’
3. Street Side Yard: 10’
4. Rear Yard: 20’
5. Lot Area: 13,500 sq. ft.
6. Lot Width: 100’
7. Lot Coverage: 55%
8. Accessory Buildings – Distance to Side Street on Corner Lots: 10’
f. The following Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)
conditions shall apply:
1. The applicant shall provide a total half-width of right-of-way for the
following roadway:
Camelback Road 65 feet
Perryville Road 65 feet
181st Avenue 30 feet for west side
181st Avenue Minimum 18 feet east side of the monument
line (8’ for additional pavement to make two
lanes/two way road and 10’ for clear zone
distance)
All such dedications shall be in fee and free of all liens and
encumbrances. Prior to acceptance of such dedication, the applicant
shall provide the County an owner’s title insurance policy issued to the
County, the MCDOT environmental checklist and any and all other
requirements as set forth in the “MCDOT Right-of-Way Dedications
Reference Guide”. Until Maricopa County has accepted said dedication,
all responsibilities, including but not limited to maintenance and repair for
the property to be dedicated shall be that of the applicant.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 14 of 16

Right-of-Way dedication shall occur within six (6) months of approval of
this request by the Board of Supervisors and prior to zoning clearance.
2. Provide access easement for portions of box culvert structures that’s
outside of the right-of-way limits for MCDOT inspection purposes.
3. Roadway reviews of planning and/or zoning cases are for conceptual
design only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with current
MCDOT Design Standard.
4. Based upon the conceptual design nature of the preliminary plat plans
submitted, changes to the site layout and /or a reduction in the number
of building lots may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the
subdivision drainage infrastructure.
5. All interior streets within the proposed development are to be constructed
to minimum County standards.
g. The following Drainage Review conditions shall apply:
1. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and the Maricopa
County Drainage Policies and Standards.
2. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
3. Prior to issuance of any permits for development of the site, the
applicant/property owner shall obtain the necessary encroachment
permits from the Maricopa County Department of Transportation
(MCDOT) for landscaping or other improvements in the right-of-way.
h. The following Flood Control District (FCD) conditions shall apply:
1. A Floodplain Use Permit must be obtained from the Floodplain
Management and Services Division of the Flood Control District.
2. Approval of the Conditional Letter of Map Revision by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will be required prior to Flood
Control District recommending approval of the Final Plat.
j. All outdoor lighting shall conform to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
k. Development of the site shall be in compliance with all applicable Maricopa
County Air Quality rules and regulations.
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 15 of 16

l. An archeological survey shall be submitted to and approved by the Arizona
State Historic Preservation Office prior to issuance of a grading permit. The
applicant must contact the State office prior to initiating disturbance of the site.
The applicant shall provide the Planning and Development Department with
written proof of compliance with this stipulation.
m. Prior to Final Plat approval, developer(s) and/or builder(s) shall establish
emergency fire protection services, covering all real property contained within
the project area during course of construction and shall obtain a ‘will serve’
letter substantiating coverage from the appropriate Fire District, Department or
Company servicing the site.
n. All habitable buildings constructed within this subdivision shall be constructed to
attain a noise reduction level as per ARS § 28-8482(B).
o. Amendments to the site plan and narrative report shall be processed as a
revised application in accordance with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
Article 304.9.
p. Noncompliance with the conditions of approval will be treated as a violation in
accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. Further,
noncompliance of the conditions of approval may be grounds for action in
accordance with Chapter 3 (Conditional Zoning).
q. Non-compliance with the regulations administered by the Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department, Maricopa County Department of
Transportation, Drainage Review Division, Planning and Development
Department, or the Flood Control District of Maricopa County may be grounds
for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa
County Zoning Ordinance.
r. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if
the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with
conditions.
Presented by: Rachel Applegate, Planner
Reviewed by: Matt Holm, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor
Reviewed by: Darren Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director
Attachments: Case Maps (2 pages)
Vicinity Maps (2 pages)
Narrative Report/Executive Summary (8 pages)
1st Routing Memo (2 pages)
MCESD comments (2 pages)
MCDOT Engineering comments (2 pages)
Drainage Engineering comments (1 page)
FCD comments (3 pages)
MCDEM comments (1 page)
Parks and Recreation comments (1 page)
Luke Air Force Base comments (2 pages)
City of Goodyear comments (2 pages)
MWD comments (2 pages)
Letters in opposition (22 pages)
Agenda Items: 4 & 5 – CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Page 16 of 16

ONE
MARICOPA COUNTY STOP
SHOP
7. N 1 IL... 1 • ____E;..S 1
•
I ,
,s,...
4) I I ,
-
i? :11 451
vt; r f'.
:-. .:. 1
,,,.. Fil n 77.
. : . _ $ 1 I.
..,
lomr.,:z ,r6i4 q 9 v [1&
'4.%
• , IN Ain
."- , 1 ,..,.. ,.._
1 , t n
1, 1 F: „ 4. • .:
• ...,_
1 '1
. • r...
. A
--.4 ,,- i J J
2 1
4 . , r
r
' o r7 t .
....I. .^ .
I
1
I
* 0_ ..',_ 411 4/01
lamozza=z,—.,.Cani el 13,i E- k r-7'',- d :-..v... 1...::it M.A,,..M.„...„.•.,.. __. W / Ft - . .. II7 A
. . ..„., ,
:. .. ...
t
L-
''
Application Name: Russell Ranch South CPA
Legal Description
T2NI R02W 15
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
ZACH HILGART for Hilgart Wilson LLC 602.490.0535
ZHILGART@HILGARTWILSON.COM
CPA2012012
Case Address Parcel Primary:
Generated Jan 6, 2015 9:01:25 AM Gross acres: 136 approx. Map scale: 1:8,181
Aerials Sep-Oct 2011
Supervisor District No. 4
RUSSELL RANCH SOUTH - REQUEST TO CHANGE THE WHITE TANK/GRAND AVENUE AREA PLAN LAND USE OF 'LARGE LOT
RESIDENTIAL (1-2 D.U./AC.)' TO 'SMALL LOT RESIDENTIAL (2-5 D.U./AC.r.
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ

ONE
MARICOPA COUNTY STOP
SHOP
Application Name: ZC With Overlay - Russell Ranch South
Legal Description
T02N RO2W 015
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
ZACH HILGART for FlilgartWilson 602.490.0535
ZHILGART@H1 WAR TWILSON.COM
Case Address Parcel Primary: 502-27-015K Z20'12097
18502W CAMELBACK Rd
LITCH FIELD PARK AZ 85340 502-27-012J
Generated Jan 6, 2015 8:38:38 AM Gross acres: 136 approx. Map scale: 1:8,181
Aerials Sep-Oct 2011
Supervisor District No. 4
RUSSELL RANCH SOUTH - ZONE CHANGE TO R1-10 RUPD AND R1-18 RUPP.
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ

ONE
MARICOPA COUNTY STOP
SHOP
. -._ - :Al .II -r,,v_, 1 1517377,j il;',47317gP‘: ,.:7,iPlit-Efill fq
A _ ..•
ti tr,-
' F
1 e F7 .] ir.-A
,,, '7 .i., tr,, 'IL 0 I 1, t ad L
- ' .. ;
i ih LL IFIP: =i2T..1 Tit1 .9P, "
.. 200 UlDP 1 r L.:1', -- 9 '1
4. '. ,-. ! , Fi 1'7' viral r1:1
IL a i,',.!ic, 'i,' -..k, - I tr , ,, I - Li. k . • .., 4. .7;1 P':?1, ' i
,r
L kA t III F., I 1 1 NI L • g 7•:,1 1 , i
:a F71 1
ikr* • ..>''' 1 IN
1.: 11 . tt. .At'' 4.
• ',4' . '' Li ori 1, -AT-1 _, sA i:.;!.71,4•Y . 'c:..:,.
.. ..g.
,.112:11.!U ,i,-::1, 043115KIEla ,
.1' 1
A 0 _ ,.. , A.1740 1 ,
r .L
, PURIM i rv,f, -!-1•,,-
,k-: h .1- , •
qp4rA- L - - tni7.1^1_,
I, . 4 q 7 1 .-.3Tg. n I '
Ne k, El laniMT
. VI S 11
i 0 I..
'N'.,- „i- "' '4
11
10
,
,r.Z& L4 iL " - -72- L Anibl ba 1 -
.1 1
r
Brd Li &II
..
Vi VI El e
• „
..„., ri T -kg —
IT
:
t 1 i
—. V
--, L i
1 1
tt I Mem, , ii
I 1
Application Name: Russell Ranch South CPA
Legal Description
T2N RO2W 15
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
ZACH HILGART for Hilgart Wilson LLC 602.490.0535
ZHILGART@HILGARTWILSON.COM
CPA2012012
Case Address Parcel Primary;
Generated Jan 6,2015 9:01:06 AM Gross acres: 136 approx. Map scale: 1:14,400
Aerials Sep-Oct 2011
Supervisor District No. 4
RUSSELL RANCH SOUTH - REQUEST TO CHANGE THE WHITE TANK/GRAND AVENUE AREA PLAN LAND USE OF 'LARGE LOT
RESIDENTIAL (1-2 ELUJACT TO 'SMALL LOT RESIDENTIAL (2-5 D.U./AC.).
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ

ONE
MARICOPA COUNTY STOP
SHOP
RIM/ I MIKE ' -- ' al 7711; MMULa 1 It kiLLEraaagli
r
I
[4 1
' H — ,II i
. 1 1 na.1 R1 ulrt - - - - - r'-- eilf:5.- 72 .- 151" Ill 0.
/
4 .1 6 ..".-Loo IVAIVLI L 1, m
- 1 fil N lifin rl ' :' . : 0 ra
ri: Kt. 11 11.'7 - ,A.T.97.1019n5PS "
.1 " 0 ...," 1, L al D. 1
KINLYEMIRr ksC" -",!'. ..
, r IV'S i
ISTZ7 II li IMSPIff 0:.1.30752Kr.r; _ 1
t.,,, 11 ,1--. F, -.] 711
I w ,,' ' !c ' m - .12 -=:7'16J 11:1 r-1
! ( „..„.:,,, 1 L L , LiA LA ., •
,, 1 ,- msnoin -q4
I , 337.1417.1 roil
, 'E. -' !Mg n
*
. z-- -t.W-
] ,
a 4 .,-..........,,a,_, I Lai ,- I b-at,1 R i
,.
.7.::::
'
4:kg riE.A
EN ,
NtiAilt", Ef :I
t , 4t -'.-
i. R. 1- ----,-,
, ., '11: k
2,
- '
Application Name: ZC With Overlay - Russell Ranch South
Legal Description
TO2N RO2W 015
Applicant Applicant Phone/Email
ZACH HILGART for HilgartWilson 602.490.0535
ZHILGART@HILGARTWILSON.COM
Case Address Parcel Primary: 502-27-015K Z2012097
18502W CAMELBACK Rd
LITCHFIELD PARK AZ 85340 502-27-012J
Generated Jan 6, 2015 8:58:43 AM Gross acres: 136 approx. Map scale: 1:14,400
Aerials Sep-Oct 2011
Supervisor District No. 4
RUSSELL RANCH SOUTH -ZONE CHANGE TO RI-10 RUPD AND R1-18 RUPD.
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ

1.0 Executive Summary
This Project is referred to as Russell Ranch South (the Project) to distinguish it from the adjacent
Russell Ranch development. The approximate 135.6-acre Project is generally situated north of
Camelback Road between Perryville Road to the west and 181st Avenue to the east in Section 15,
Township 2 North, Range 2 West. Refer to Figure 1, Vicinity & Adjacent Properties Map for Project
location and adjacent developments.
A Development Agreement was entered into on April 7, 2011, as recorded in document 2011-
0296740 of the Official Records of the Maricopa County Recorder's Office, between the County and
the property owner, whereby, the County agrees to fully cooperate in reviewing and processing any
development plans for the Property (Russell Ranch Phase IV, east half of Russell Ranch South),
which may include, without [imitation, a replacement plat or plats and requests for increased density
in an effort to offset economic losses due to a reduction in the developable area within the Property
resulting from the need to re-engineer the Drainage System to accommodate flows from other areas
of the Russell Ranch subdivision.
Because:of this agreement, an initial RUPD request was submitted in November 2012 for a 448 lot
development, which was generally well accepted by the County. However, in response to a meeting
with neighbors and other public outreach efforts, the site plan has since been modified and
significantly reduced to 333 single family lots with a density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. The
reduction in density of 25% also places less demand on County services that will be provided to this
community.
This request proposes a mix of residential lots consisting of a minimum 55-, 65-, and 100-foot lot
widths that transition to the surrounding residential developments while providing a significant
amount of open space and community amenities. The revised site plan and lowered density is in
response to input received from the surrounding neighbors. Per the development agreement
between the County and the property owner, the proposed open space and combined drainage areas
within the Project will assist in addressing the deficiencies in drainage design from the adjacent
Russell Ranch development. The Project establishes a cohesive community and addresses adjacent
drainage deficiencies while blending the diverse existing and planned developments within the area.
A rezoning is being processed concurrent with this application. The rezoning is in response to
current market conditions. In addition, there is a development agreement with Maricopa County (the
County) to provide additional open space to accommodate the deficiencies in stormwater retention
volumes not properly retained onsite on that portion of Russell Ranch Phases north and east of
the Project.
The purpose of this request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan and White Tank/Grand Avenue
Area Plan from Large Lot Residential (1-2) to Small Lot Residential (2-5) on the 135.6 acres of
Russell Ranch South, Refer to Figure 2, Existing Land Use Map and Figure 3, Proposed Land Use
Map for existing and proposed [and uses for the Project and surrounding area.
1

Entitlement History
The Project was previously entitled as part of two complete and separate Residential Unit Plan of
Developments (RUPDs) and Commercial Unit Plan of Developments (CUPDs) known as Russell
Ranch (Phases I - V & Commercial parcel) and Russell Ranch VI (residential & Commercial). The
Project is currently zoned R1-18 RUPD.
The original Russell Ranch, which included Russell Ranch Phases I-V and a commercial parcel
(located at the southwest corner of Bethany Home Road and Citrus Road), consists of approximately
299 acres with R1-18 RUPD and C-2 CURD zoning districts and overlays. The Preliminary Plat for all
five phases ran concurrent with the RUPD and CUPID and both were approved by the Board of
Supervisors on October 18, 2000. The case numbers were Z2000093 for the RUPD/CUPD and
S2000045 for the Preliminary Plat.
• A Final Plat for Phase I was approved by the Board of Supervisors on August 8, 2001.
• A Final Plat for Phase II was approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 4,2003.
• A Final Plat for Phase ill was approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 15, 2004.
• ,A Phase III Corrective Final Plat was approved by Planning and Development on March 29,
2005.
• A Final Plat for Phase IV was approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 7, 2006.
• Phase V was a part of the Russell Ranch RUPD but does not have a Final Plat.
Approximately 223 acres within Phases I, II, and ill has mostly been developed with custom lots in
various stages of development. Remaining vacant lots within Russell Ranch are restricted from
development by a building moratorium imposed by the County until a drainage resolution is
implemented. The Project will provide that resolution.
Russell Ranch VI consists of approximately 80 acres with R1-18 RUPD and C-1 CUPD zoning districts
and overlays. The Russell Ranch VI preliminary plat ran concurrent with the RUPD and both were
approved by the Board of Supervisors on July 6, 2005. The case numbers were 52003089 for the
Preliminary Plat and Z2003123 for the RUPD/CUPD. Russell Ranch VI was not final platted.
2

9E23131=3
The following image and table provides a summary of the entitlement history of Russell Ranch
(Phases I-V) and Russell Ranch VI.
RUSSEL RANCH RUED
RUSSELL RANCH VI
RUED
RUSSELL RANCH
EXISTING
RUSSELL RANCH
COMMERCIAL
RUSSELL RANCH SOUTH
(PROPOSED REZONE)
RUSSELL RANCH VI
COMMERCIAL
RUSSELL RANCH ENTITLEMENT HISTORY
Zoning
(R1-18
Zoning/Preliminary RUPD/CUPD) Pre-Plat Final Plat Not Platted
Plat Case Nos. Gross Area Gross Area Gross Area Gross Area
1 Russell Ranch Phase I 85.1
Russell Ranch Phase H 65.7
Russell Ranch Phase HI 72000093/ 70.7
299.3 299.3
Russell Ranch Commercial 52000045 5.9
Russell Ranch Phase IV* 58.1
Russell Ranch Phase V* 11.8
Russell Ranch VI Commercial Z2003123/ 12.2
Russell Ranch VI* S2003089 79.7 79.7 67.5
Sub-Total 280.6 98.4
Total 379.1 379.1 379.1
*Part of Russell Ranch South.
3

The Project is comprised of approximately 68 acres from Phases [V and V of Russell Ranch (east
half) and approximately 68 acres from the residential portion of Russell Ranch VI (north and east of
Russell Ranch VI Commercial parcel). Refer to Figure 1, Vicinity & Adjacent Properties Map for
location of the Project and existing uses of the surrounding area. The intent is to rezone the Project
as a RIND separate from the previously approved RUPD/CUPD, Preliminary Plats, and Final Plats.
Russell Ranch Phases I, II, III and the commercial parcel and Russell Ranch VI commercial parcel are
not being amended.
The following table outlines the updated acreages for Russell Ranch (Phases I, II, Ill, and commercial
parcel), Russell Ranch VI (commercial parcel), and Russell Ranch South.
RUSSELL RANCH UPDATED ACREAGES
Gross Area
Total Russell Ranch, Russell
Ranch VI, & Russell Ranch 379.1
South
Russell Ranch Phases I, II, III 222.5
Russell Ranch Commercial
6.9
(Bethany Home & Citrus Ave)
Russell Ranch VI Commercial
12.2
(Came lback Rd & Perryville Rd)
Dedicated Adjacent ROW
1.8
(Phase IV Final Plat)*
Russell Ranch South
(Phases IV, V,& VI)* 135.6
*Part of Russell Ranch South.
4

1.0 Executive Summary
This Project is referred to as Russell Ranch South (the Project) to distinguish it from the
adjacent Russell Ranch development. The approximate 135.6-acre Project is generally
situated north of Camelback Road between Perryville Road to the west and 181st Avenue to
the east in Section 15, Township 2 North, Range 2 West. Refer to Figure 1, Vicinity Map for
Project location. A copy of the A.L.T.A. is provided in Appendix A, A.L.T.A./A.C.S.M, Land Title
Survey.
A Development Agreement was entered into on April 7, 2011, as recorded in document
2011-0296740 of the Official Records of the Maricopa County Recorder's Office, between
the Maricopa and the property owner, whereby, the County agrees to fully cooperate in
reviewing and processing any development plans for the Property (Russell Ranch Phase IV,
east half of Russell Ranch South), which may include, without limitation, a replacement plat
or plats and requests for increased density in an effort to offset economic Losses due to a
reduction in the developable area within the Property resulting from the need to re-engineer
the Drainage System to accommodate flows from other areas of the Russell Ranch
subdivision.
Because of this agreement, an initial RUPD request was submitted in November 2012 for a
448 lot development, which was generally well accepted by the County. However, in
response to a meeting with neighbors and other public outreach efforts, the site plan has
since been modified and significantly reduced to 333 single family lots with a density of 2.4
dwelling units per acre. The reduction in density of 25% also places less demand on County
services that will be provided to this community.
This request proposes a mix of residential lots consisting of a minimum 55-, 65-, and 100-
foot lot widths that transition to the surrounding residential developments while providing a
significant amount of open space and community amenities. The revised site plan and
lowered density is in response to input received from the surrounding neighbors. Per the
development agreement between the County and the property owner, the proposed open
space and combined drainage areas within the Project will assist in addressing the
deficiencies in drainage design from the adjacent Russell Ranch development. The Project
establishes a cohesive community and addresses adjacent drainage deficiencies while
blending the diverse existing and planned developments within the area.
A General Comprehensive Plan Amendment is being processed concurrent with this
application. The [and use designation is currently Large Lot Residential (1-2) per the White
Tank / Grand Avenue Area Plan. The proposed land use designation is Small Lot Residential
(2-5) to allow development of more traditional single family residential lots.
1

Entitlement History
The Project was previously entitled as part of two complete and separate Residential Unit
Plan of Developments (RUPDs) and Commercial Unit Plan of Developments (CUPDs) known
as Russell Ranch (Phases I - V & Commercial parcel) and Russell Ranch VI (residential &
Commercial). The Project is currently zoned R1-18 RUPD. The rezoning of this property is in
response to a development agreement with Maricopa County (the County) to provide
additional open space to accommodate the deficiencies in stormwater retention volumes
not properly retained onsite on that portion of Russell Ranch Phases I-III north and east of
the Project.
The original Russell Ranch, which included Russell Ranch Phases kV and a commercial
parcel (located at the southwest corner of Bethany Home Road and Citrus Road), consists of
approximately 299 acres with R1-18 RUPD and C-2 CUPD zoning districts and overlays. The
Preliminary Plat for all five phases ran concurrent with the RUPD and CUPD and both were
approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 18, 2000. The case numbers were
Z2000093 for the RUPD/CUPD and S2000045 for the Preliminary Plat.
• A Final Plat for Phase I was approved by the Board of Supervisors on August 8,
2001.
• A Final Plat for Phase II was approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 4, 2003.
• A Final Plat for Phase Ill was approved by the Board of Supervisors on December
15, 2004.
• A Phase III Corrective Final Plat was approved by Planning and Development on
March 29, 2005.
• A Final Plat for Phase IV was approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 7, 2006.
• Phase V was a part of the Russell Ranch RUPD but does not have a Final Plat.
Approximately 223 acres within Phases 1, 11, and III has been developed with custom lots in
various stages of development.
Russell Ranch VI consists of approximately 80 acres with R1-18 RUPD and C4 CUPD zoning
districts and overlays. The Russell Ranch VI preliminary plat ran concurrent with the RUPD
and both were approved by the Board of Supervisors on July 6, 2005. The case numbers
were S2003089 for the Preliminary Plat and Z2003123 for the RUPD/CUPD. Russell Ranch
VI was not final platted.
2

The following image and table provides a summary of the entitlement history of Russell
Ranch (Phases [-V) and Russell Ranch VI.
LEGEND
RUSSEL RANCH RUH) OCISIRDIX1
RUSSELL RANCH VI DDEGO:114)
RUPD
id RUSSELL RANCH
EXISTING
RUSSELL RANCH
COMMERCIAL
RUSSELL RANCH SOUTH
(PROPOSED REZONE)
RUSSELL RANCH VI
COMMERCIAL
0,1114%
V2ty%
UNSUGDMED
fltfl rra-a-nr-rrrY-1 -fa-urv,
DELL
RUSSELL RANCH ENTITLEMENT HISTORY
Zoning
(R1-18
Zoning/Preliminary RUPD/CUPD) Pre-Plat Final Plat Not Platted
Plat Case Nos. Gross Area Gross Area Gross Area Gross Area
Russell Ranch Phase I 85.1
Russell Ranch Phase II 66.7
Russell Ranch Phase III Z2000093/ 70.7
299.3 299.3
Russell Ranch Commercial S2000045 6.9
Russell Ranch Phase IV* 58.1
Russell Ranch Phase V* 11.8
Russell Ranch VI Commercial Z2003123/ 12.2
79.7 79.7
Russell Ranch VI* 52003089 67.5
Sub-Total 280.5 98.4
Total 379.1 379.1 379.1
*Part of Russell Ranch South.
3

The Project is comprised of approximately 68 acres from Phases 1V and V of Russell Ranch
(east half) and approximately 68 acres from the residential portion of Russell Ranch VI
(north and east of Russell Ranch VI Commercial parcel). Refer to Appendix B, Context
Photos and Key Map for location of the Project and photos of the site and surrounding area.
The intent is to rezone the Project as a RUPD separate from the previously approved
RUPD/CUPD, and Preliminary Plats. Russell Ranch Phases I, II, Ill and the commercial
parcel and Russell Ranch VI commercial parcel are not being amended.
The following table outlines the updated acreages for Russell Ranch (Phases I, II, III, and
commercial parcel), Russell Ranch VI (commercial parcel), and Russell Ranch South.
RUSSELL RANCH UPDATED ACREAGES
Gross Area
Total Russell Ranch, Russell
Ranch VI, & Russell Ranch 379.1
South
Russell Ranch Phases I, [I, III 222.5
Russell Ranch Commercial
6.9
(Bethany Home & Citrus Ave)
Russell Ranch VI Commercial
12.2
(Camelback Rd & Perryville Rd)
Dedicated Adjacent ROW
1.8
(Phase IV Final Plat)
Russell Ranch South
135.6
(Phases IV, V,& VI)*
*Part of Russell Ranch South.
4

Planning & Development ONE
Department ST
$HOP
DATE: November 28, 2012
TO: DISTRIBUTION NOTED BELOW
FROM: Rachel Applegate, Planner, Comprehensive Planning Division
RE: Russell Ranch South - 1st Routing
CASE #: CPA2012012
Enclosed are the following application materials relating to the comprehensive plan
amendment noted above date stamped received November 21, 2012:
• Application
• Narrative Report
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will hold a meeting to discuss the above
referenced case on Tuesday, January 8, 2013 at 9:00 a.m., at the Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department, 1st floor of 501 N. 44th Street, in Phoenix.
You, or your authorized representative, area invited to prepare and submit written
recommendations at the meeting. If you are unable to attend, please submit written
recommendations to our Department prior to the date of the meeting.
Please call me at 602-372-0318 (or e-mail to rachelapolegate@mctil.maricopa.aov if
you have any questions. Thank you.
COUNTY AGENCIES:
Gerald Toscano, MCDOT
Wes Shonerd, MCESD
Ana Gorbenko, Flood Control District
John Padilla, Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management
EXTERNAL ROUTING:
City of Glendale
City of Goodyear
Luke Air Force Base
Maricopa Association of Governments
West Valley Alliance
Maricopa Water District
Valley View Newspaper
State of Arizona, Office of the Attorney General
Agua Fria High School District
Litchfield Elementary School District
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY (memo only via e-mail):
Zach Hilgart, HilgartWilson LLC.
501 N. 4411) Street, Suite 200 • Phoenix, AZ 85008 • (602) 372-0318 • (602) 506-3711 fax
rachelapplegate@mail.moricopo.gov
Internet: www.maricepagov/planning • www.mygreengovernment.com

Planning & Development
Department
Material ernailed unless otherwise noted
DATE: December 4, 2012
TO: Distribution List [email w/attachments]
FROM: Patty Zaricor, AICP, Planner
SUBJ: Z2012097 /S2012007Russell Ranch South
1st Review of Rezone and Preliminary Plat
Please review the enclosed following application materials relating to the zoning
case noted above:
• Application (Z2012097 & S2012007)
• Narrative
• Preliminary Plat/Zoning Exhibit
• Landscape Pion
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will hold a meeting to discuss the above-
referenced case on Tuesday, January 8, 2013, at 9:45 a.m., at the Maricopa
County Planning and Development Department on the 2nd Floor of 501 North 44t1 '
Street in Phoenix.
Please call me at 602-506-8358 if you have any questions. Thank you.
Distribution List
City of Glendale, Thomas Ritz [tritz@glendaleaz.corn]
City of Goodyear, Planning [gycdev@goodyearaz.gov ]
State of Arizona, Office of Attorney General [joy.hernbrode@azag.gov ]
Luke Air Force Base, Community Initiatives Team [Robert.Dubsky@luke.af.mil ]
State Fire Marshal poseph.tenorio@dfbls.az.gov ]
EPCOR, Agua Fria Water District (15626 N Del Webb, Blvd, Sun City AZ)
Liberty Utilities, 12725W Indian School Rd Avondale AZ
Valley View Newspaper [editor@westvalleyview.com ]
Savannah Homeowners Assn, c/o Associated Asset Management
Russell Ranch Homeowners Assn, c/o Blue Sky Management.
Litchfield #79 School District [potopoff@lesd.k12.az.us
C: Applicant, Zach Hilgart, Hilgart Wilson, LLC [zhilgart@hilgartwilson.com ]
Owner, J & A Camelback Property LLC [samjones43@cox.net ]
501 N 40 St, Ste 125 • Phoenix, AZ 85008 • (602) 506-8358 • (602) 506-8369 fax
pattyzaricor@mail.marioopa.gov
Page 1 >Internet: www.maricopa.gov/planning < Rev 10/05

Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department Water
and Waste Management
Planning Subdivision Program Infrastructure & DATE: December 5, 2012
1001 N. Central Avenue #150
Phoenix, Phone: (602) Arizona 506-1058 85004 TO: Rachel Applegate, Planning & Development Dept.
Fax: (602) 506-5813 Planner
TDD 602 506 6704
FROM: Wesley A. Shonerd, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Russell Ranch South Comprehensive Plan Amendment; CPA2012012
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has reviewed
documents received from the Maricopa County Planning and Development
Department for the above referenced project. This project is a request for a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) for an existing 136-acre parcel from the
previously approved Russell Ranch subdivision, Russell Ranch south is an irregularly
shaped parcel near the northeast corner of Camelback Road and Perryville Road
near the City of Goodyear. Specifically, the Russell Ranch South consists of parcels
from Russell Ranch Phases IV and V, and from Russell Ranch VI. This new CPA will
change the comprehensive plan form large lot residential to small lot residential (2-5
lots/acre), According to the submitted documentation for the accompanying rezone
case (Z2012097), EPCOR and Liberty Water provide sanitary sewer services to
Russell Ranch South. EPCOR provides potable water to the entire project.
Based on the above, MCESD raised no concerns about this project to the Planning
& Development Department in Permits Plus on December 5, 2012.
Stipulations: None
It should be noted that several other Maricopa County agencies must review and
recommend approval of this project. Final authority of this project rests with the
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.

Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department Water
and Waste Management
Subdivision Infrastructure & DATE: December 5, 2012
Planning Program
1001 N. Central Avenue #150
Phoenix, Athena 85004 TO: Patty Zaricor, Planning & Development Dept.
Phone: (602) 506-1058
Fax: (602) 506-5813 Planner
MD 602 506 6704
FROM: Wesley A. Shonerd, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Russell Ranch South Rezone; Z2012097
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has reviewed
documents received from the Maricopa County Planning and Development
Department for the above referenced project. This project is a zoning request based
on the accompanying Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA2012012) for an existing
136-acre parcel from the previously approved Russell Ranch subdivision. Russell
Ranch south is an irregularly shaped parcel near the northeast corner of Camelback
Road and Perryville Road near the City of Goodyear. Specifically, the Russell Ranch
South consists of parcels from Russell Ranch Phases IV and V, and from Russell
Ranch VI. This new rezoning action will change the existing RUPD Zoning District
from R1-18, RUPD to R1-6, RUPD. In addition, an accompanying new Preliminary
Plat (52012007) will also be submitted. According to the submitted documentation
EPCOR and Liberty Water each provide sanitary sewer services to parts of Russell
Ranch South. EPCOR provides potable water to the entire project.
Based on the above, MCESD raised no concerns about this project to the Planning
8i Development Department in Permits Plus on December 5, 2012.
Stipulations: None
It should be noted that several other Maricopa County agencies must review and
recommend approval of this project. Final authority of this project rests with the
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.

M aric op a County
Planning & Development Department
Date: September 24, 2014
Jack Situ, P.E.
Plamiing & Development
501 North 44th Street, Suite 200 Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director, Department of Planning &
Phoenix, Phone: (602) Arizona 506-8799 85008 Development
Fax: (602) 506-8762
www.maricop email address: a, ov/planning Attn: Rachel Applegate, Planner, Planning & Development Services
jacksituOrre,maricopa.qov
From: Jack Situ, P.E., Planning & Development Services
cc: Michael Norris, P.E., Engineering Manager, Planning & Development
Services
Subject: Z2012097 — Russell Ranch South
Address: NEC of Perryville Rd and Caraelback Road
MCDOT Engineering Review has reviewed the submittal package date stamped
September 15, 2014 and has no further objections and recommend approval of the
zoning case. Any approval of this case should include the following stipulations:
1. The applicant shall provide a total half-width of right-of-way for the following
roadway:
Camelback Road 65 feet
Perryville Road 65 feet
181 5t Avenue 30 feet for west side
181 5t Avenue Minimum 18' east side of the monument line (8' for
additional pavement to make a two lanes/ two way road
and 10' for clear zone distance)
All such dedications shall be in fee and free of all liens and encumbrances.
Prior to acceptance of such dedication, the applicant shall provide the County an
owner's title insurance policy issued to the County, the MCDOT environmental
checklist and any and all other requirements as set forth in the "MCDOT Right-
of-Way Dedications Reference Guide". Until Maricopa County has accepted
said dedication, all responsibilities, including but not limited to maintenance
and repair for the property to be dedicated shall be that of the applicant.
Right-of—Way dedication shall occur within six (6) months of approval of this
request by the Board of Supervisors and prior to zoning clearance.
2. Provide access easement for portions of box culvert structures that's outside of
the right-of-way limits for MCDOT inspection purposes.

3. Roadway reviews of planning and/or zoning cases are for conceptual design
only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle applicants
to future designs that are not in conformance with current MCDOT Design
Standard.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require clarification of these
comments.

Maricopa County
Planning & Development Department
Date: November 24, 2014
Kevin BischeI, P.E.
Plannin' g & Development
501 North 214th Street, Suite 200 Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director, Department of Planning &
Phoenix, Arizona 85008 Development
Phone: (602) 372-0966
Fax: (602) 506-8762
ww-vv.marieopagov/plaiming email address: Attn: Rachel Applegate, Planner, Planning & Development Services
kevhblschel@rnailmaricapa.qov
Via: Bob Fedorka, RE., Drainage Engineering Supervisor, Development
Services
From: Kevin Bischel, P.E., Drainage Engineer, Development Services
Subject: Z2012097 — Russell Ranch South Re-Zone
APN: 502-27-015K
I have reviewed the report submittal date stamped 11/04/2014 for this Zoning case.
Drainage engineering has no objections.
Any approval of this case shall include the following standard stipulations:
• Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only
and does not represent fmal design approval nor shall it entitle applicants to
future designs that are not in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa
County Zoning Ordinance and the Maricopa County Drainage Policies and
Standards.
• All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current engineering
policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for
construction.
• Based on the conceptual design nature of the preliminary plat plans submitted,
changes to the site layout and/or a reduction in the number of building lots
may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the subdivision
drainage infrastructure.
Please see Fowls 706 and 707, Maricopa County's Drainage Requirements for
Preliminary Plat & Master Plan for required Grading & Drainage information.

Flood Control District
of Maricopa County
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Date: November 27, 2012
To: Darren V. Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director
Maticopa County Planning & Development Department
Attn: Terri Hogan, AICP, Principal Planner, Project Management Divsion
From: Kenneth de Roulhac, P.R., CFM, Sr. Civil Engineer, Floodplain Mgmt. & Services Division
Via: Kelli A. Sertich, AICP, CFM, Floodplain Mgint. & Services Division Manager
Subject: CPA 2012-012 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Russell Ranch South)
(Location: North of Camelback Road, between Perryville and Citrus Roads)
(Floodplain Review — Plans and submittals dated November 21, 2012)
The subject property is within a delineated 100-year (one percent chance) Zone AR floodplain of
Perryville Road Wash. Prior to any development and approval of a building permit, a Floodplain Use
Permit must be obtained from the Floodplain Management and Services Division of the Flood
Control District.
The proposed use would not be in conflict with any existing or proposed Flood Control District
projects. We have no objections to the subject request; however, other County ordinances will need to
be complied with.
The applicant should be aware that we have conducted a major stonnwater management study in this
area. The Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan Update (ADMPU) is available
for use by developers. New development in the watershed is expected to acknowledge and assess their
project for compatibility with the ADMPU. Deviations from the ADMPU must be documented, and
an engineering analysis provided that shows the deviations do not increase downstream flood peaks,
volumes or other flobd hazards. A copy of the Loop 303 Corridor/White Tanks ADMPU is available
at our office for review. Please contact Gregory Jones of the District at (602) 506-5537 for specific
information about the ADMP U.
The subject property is located within a regulatory floodplain In accordance with NFIP regulations,
Arizona Revised Statutes and the Floodplain Regulations for Mancopa County, prior to development
approval within a regulatory floodplain/floodway, the applicant will be required to submit a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision to FEMA. Approval of the Conditional Letter of Map
Revision by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will be required prior to
the Flood Control District recommending approval of the Final Plat.
2801 West Durango Street Phoenix, Arizona 85009 Phone: 602-506-1501 Fax: 602-506-4601

Memo to: Darren V. Gerard, A.I.CP
Subject: CPA 2012-012
Page 2 of 2
November 27, 2012
The applicant is encouraged to schedule an appointment with the District to discuss the development
requirements in further detail.
Other details of this plan have not been reviewed, nor have we determined whether this development
meets current drainage design standards, but rather we rely on the expertise at the Planning and
Development Department to provide such review. Any comments that we provide, or information
contained herein relates to the interaction of this project with District-managed floodplai-ns and
projects, or special problems or concerns that we may be aware of in this general vicinity within the
Flood Control District's scope of jurisdiction.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (602) 506-2902.
KGD/ag
Copy to: Gerald Toscano, P.E., MCDOT
2801 West Durango Street Phoenix, Arizona 85009 Phone: 602-506-1501 Fax: 602-506-4601

Flood Control District
of Maricopa County
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Date: Apri118, 2014
To: Darren V. Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director
Maricopa County Planning & Development Department
Attn: Rachel Applegate, Planner
From: Stacey A Lapp, KR., CFM, Sr. Civil Engineer, Drainage Engineering
Subject: Z2012097 (Russell Ranch South RUPD rezone)
(Floodplain Review — Plans & submittals dated April 4, 2014)
The subject property is within the delineated 100-year (one percent chance) floodplain of Camelback Wash.
Prior to any development and approval of a building permit, a Floodplain Use Permit must be obtained from
the Flo odplain Management and Services Division of the Flood Control District. The proposed use would
not be in conflict with any existing or proposed Flood Control District projects. We have no objections to
the RUPD rezone request dated April 4, 2014; however, other County- ordinances will need to be complied
with.
As the subject property is located within a regulatory floodplain and the applicant has indicated in writing (as
described in report) that a change to the published FIRM will occur, in accordance with NFU regulations,
prior to development approval within a regulatory floc dplain/floodway the applicant may be required to
submit a Conditional Letter of Map Revision to FEMA, Review of the CLOIVER application should occur at
Preliminary -Plat stage.
The applicant should be aware that the Flood Control District has conducted a major stormwater
management study in this area. The Loop 303 Corridor/ White Tanks Area Drainage Master Plan. Update
(ADATPU) is available for use by developers. New development in the watershed is expected to acknowledge
and assess their projects for compatibility -with the ADMPT.T. Deviations from the ADMPU must be
documented, and an engineering analysis. provided that shows the deviations do not increase downstream
flood peaks; volumes, or other flood hazards. A copy of the Loop 303 Corridor/ White Tanks ADMPU is
available at the District office for review. Please contact Greg Jones of the District at (602) 506-5537 for
specific information about the ADNIPU.
Other details of this plan have not been reviewed, nor have we determined whether this development meets
current drainage design Standards, but rather we rely on the expertise at the Planning & Development
Department to provide such review, Any comments that we provide, or information contained herein relates
to the interaction of this project with District-managed fla odplain.s and projects, or special problems or
concerns that we may be aware of iii this gpneral vicinity within the Flood Control District's scope of
jurisdiction,
If you have any questions, please contact me at (602) 506-4717.
SAL
2801 West Durango Street Phoenix, Arizona 85009 Phone: 602-506-1501 Pax: 602-506-4601

Mancopa County
Department of Emergency Management
5630 East McDowell Road
Phoenix, Arizona 85008-3403 DATE: December 13, 2012
Phone: (602) 273-1411
Fax: (602) 275-3638
-17: (602) 244-1638 TO: Rachel Applegate, Planner, Comprehensive Planning Division
FROM: Pete Weaver, Director
THROUGH: John Padilla, Emergency Planner ge
RE: Russell Ranch South, Case # CPA2012012
The Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management has reviewed
the documents provided by the Maricopa County Planning and Development
Department for the above referenced project. We have no comments relating
to that project.
If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact John
Padilla at (602) 273-1411.

Maricopa County
Parks & Recreation Department
234 N. Central, Suite 6400
Phoenix, Arieona 85004-2208
Phone: (602) 506-2930
Fax: (602) 506-4692 To: Tern Hogan, Planning and Development Department
From: Leigh Johnson, Park Planner
Re: Z2012097 and S2012007 (Russell Ranch South)
Date: December 3, 2012
The Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department (MCPRD) attempts to meet
customer needs based on generally accepted standards for quality parks and outdoor
recreation services. Development that increases density impacts parks and trails with an
increase in facility use and the resulting need for additional maintenance and services.
White Tank Mountain Regional Park and the Maricopa Trail, which are in close proximity to
this development, will be a benefit to the developer's new residents. The developer may wish
to work with MCPRD to voluntarily make park improvements that further enhance the quality
of life for residents of this new development community. MCPRD welcomes the opportunity to
engage in an open conversation with the developer to determine a project that benefits both
parties.
Of note, Figure 11 Community Facilities & Services appears to have the icons for "Hospital"
and "Community Park" reversed; please advise developer to correct for future exhibits.
Thank you for allowing MCPRD to participate in this process and feel free to contact us with
any questions.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND
22 April 2014
Mr. James R. Mitchell
Director, Community Initiatives Team
56th Fighter Wing
14185 West Falcon Street
Luke AFB AZ 85309-1629
Ms. Rachel Applegate, Planner
Maricopa County Planning & Development Department
501 North 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix AZ 85008-6350
Re: Case #CPA2012012 & Z2012097, Russell Ranch South
Dear Ms. Applegate
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Amendment of
Comprehensive Plan for Russell Ranch South. Russell Ranch South is located on 137 acres
north of Camelback Road between Perryville Road on the west and 181st Avenue on the east.
Russell Ranch South is located one to three-miles outside the 1988 JLUS 65 Ldn the "high noise
or accident potential zone" as identified by A.R.S. § 28-8461 and is within the "territory in the
vicinity of a military airport" also defined by A.R.S. § 28-8461.
The project proposes a density change from 2.0 du/acre to 2.4 du/acre and is slightly
above what is permitted with the existing land use designation. Luke AFB follows the guidelines
in the Graduated Density Concept (GDC). The GDC proposes, in the absence of a more
restrictive state, county or municipal general or comprehensive plan, graduating densities away
from the 65 Ldn as follows: a maximum of 2 du/acre from the 65 Ldn to 1/2 mile, a maximum of
4 du/acre from 1/2 mile to 1 mile and a maximum of 6 du/acre from 1 to 3 miles The slight
density increase proposed is consistent and well below the suggested densities of the GDC
therefore Russell Ranch South meets the GDC concept.
As described, this change is compatible and consistent with the high noise and accident
potential of Luke AFB 's flying operations. Since Russell Ranch South is located within the
"territory in the vicinity of a military airport," it is subjected to high noise and approximately 165
over flights per day, with some as low as 1,500 feet above the ground. We recommend you
review the sound attenuation requirements found in A.R.S. § 28-8482. In addition, a strong
notification program on the part of the applicant is essential to inform potential residents and
tenants about Luke AFB operations. We also recommend a review of the Luke AFB web site at
http://www.luke.af.mil, Community Interests and Community Initiatives links, for further
information.

If you have any questions, please contact my Community Planner, Barbara Plante, at
(623) 856-9981.
Sincerely
JAMES R. MITCHELL
cc:
Colonel Jeremy Sloane, Vice Commander, 56th Fighter Wing
Ms. Cindy L. Calderon, GS-13, General and Environmental Law Attorney, 56th Fighter Wing

Rachel Applegate - PLAN DEVX
From: Joe Schmitz <Joe.Schmitz@goodyearaz.gov >
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 5:20 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Cc: DL-DevelopmentPolicyCommittee
Subject: Comments on Russell Ranch South - Cases CPA2012012, Z2012097, and 52012007
Ms. Applegate:
Here are our comments on the cases referenced above for your consideration:
With regard to the rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment, while the density proposed appears to be consistent
with the graduated density concept for Luke AFB, the City's General Plan has maintained a_density of 0-2 on the property
just to the south of the subject property. Lower densities mean fewer persons being impacted by noise which is
important to maintaining Luke AFB.
In addition, the small lot development proposed in Parcel 1 (45' wide) and Parcel 2 (50 1wide) do not appear to be
consistent with the development of the surrounding area which has lots generally greater than 10,000 square feet in
area.
With respect to the preliminary plat, we would offer the following comments:
1. The southern portion of the ROW on Camelback Road has been annexed to the City of Goodyear. There is a 10-
foot wide strip of land within the City-of Glendale between the City of Goodyear ROW and the County
ROW. This type of situation has caused jurisdictional problems at times in the past. If improvements will be
constructed in the north half of the ROW, construction permits will be needed from each jurisdiction. There also
should be continued discussions, if not a formal agreement, regarding future maintenance-of the improvements
within the ROW.
2. The City of Goodyear Engineering Department requests that the following be taken into consideration for the
approval of this Preliminary Plat:
a. Per the City of Goodyear Roadway Functional Classification Plan, Camelback Road is planned to be a
major arterial/truck route along that portion of the City. The planned roadway section is a 6 lane
arterial with a bike lane on each side and a 14' raised median. The full cross section can be referenced
in COG Standard Detail G-3122.
b. Per City of Goodyear Engineering Design Standards, Chapter 4 -- For major arterial streets, full median
openings shall not be located closer than a quarter-mile apart and partial median openings, which allow
only left turns, may be located at eight mile intervals. There is a full median opening planned at the half
mile intersection and it appears that the intersection of Camelback and 184 th is being planned at less
than a quarter mile to the west. Staff suggests moving that intersection to the mid-mile or quarter-mile
location to allow for safe, controlled access to both sides of the street in the future.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on these cases.
Joe Schmitz, AICP
Planning Manager
Planning and Zoning Division
Development Services Department
. City of Goodyear - All America City
195 N. 145th Ave. Bldg. D
Goodyear, AZ 86338
(623) 932-3005
(623) 882-7748 (Fax)
ice.schmitzgdooelyearaz.dov
1

All messages created in this system belong to the City of Goodyear and should be considered a public record
subject to disclosure under Arizona Public Records Law (A.R.S. 39-121). City employees, City public officials,
and those who generate E-mail to them, should have no expectation of privacy related to the use of this
technology. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
2

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Leslie Jarrell <LeslieJ@mwdaz.com >
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Cc: Debbie Trasancos; Chris Cain
Subject: FW: Revisions for Russell Ranch South - CPA2012012 and Z2012097
Attachments: Logo; MWD 2014 Fees & Payment Schedule - Board Approved 1218.13.pdf; MWD
Drawing Requirements REV1202.13.pdf
Rachel,
"Thank you for providing the electronic submittal for Revisions for Russell Ranch South CP42012012 and
Z2012097. MWD has reviewed this submittal and determined that the proposed development project will impact
MWD. As a result, this development will require a development agreement between MWD and the developer to
address the impacts to MWD's facilities and/or property interests. Please have the developer or their consultant contact
MWD to discuss this project. Additionally, the developer will need to provide copies of any subdivision plats and utility
and improvement plans to MWD for review and approval pursuant to the attached MWD Drawing Requirements, along
with payment of the applicable plan review fees pursuant to the attached MWD Fees & Payment Schedule. Upon our
review of the plat and/or plans once they are provided by the developer, MWD will copy the City on our approval and/or
comments. Thanks again."
MWD has not-been contacted by the Developer yet. They will need to contact MWD to get the Development Agreement
process started.
Leslie Jarrell
Frorerty & Contracts 5Fedalist
Maricopa Water District
1+825 W. Grand Avenue
5u Trise, AZ- • 8.537+
hone: (62 -,)51-6-82(; 6 Ext. 20+
rax.:
lesliepmwdaz.com
From: rachelapplegate@maiLmaricopa.gov [mailto:rachelapplegate@mail.maricopa.gov]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 7:57 AM
To: tritz@glendale.com ; gycdev@goodyearaz.gov ; barbara.plante@us.af.mil ; swilken@azmag.gov; Leslie Jarrell;
editor@westvalleyview.com ; iov.hernbrode@azag.gov ; drunyan@aguafria.org ; Potapoff@lesd.k12.az.us ;
chuck fitzgerald@rmetro.com
Subject: Revisions for Russell Ranch South - CPA2012012 and Z2012097
1

Reviewing Agenices,
The following website contains the revised application materials received for
Russell Ranch South, cases CPA2012012 and Z2012097. Please review the
documents and provide review comments as soon as possible. Please note the
zoning request has changed from the original application. The website will not be
active for extended period of time so please download materials as soon as
possible.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call.
Thank you,
Rachel Applegate
Planner
Maricopa County Planning & Development
602-372-0318
rachelaboledateta,mail.maricopa.00v
Your credentials:
Username: OEBRJLDZWQ
Password: 8ZLJCx51
Download URL:
https://ftp2.maricooa.gov:443
The login above will expire on 5/11/2014 12:00:00 AM
This message was sera using GlobalSCAPE ® Secure Ad Hoc Transfer system

IdlrL JayneCoteLio
f8548 ilawdati 711,060
adiftd( Pad; ,47853'/o
July 14, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning &Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
_
We are Sending this litter to voice our strong opposition of the application for the rezoning
on Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and
Preliminary Plat # S2012007 for, originally known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high
density subdivision.
The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to
the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area.
We are against the zoning change to high density R1-10 which the application is requesting
or any other zoning change to increase the original density of the lots zoned for this area.
. We purchased our home seven years ago for the rural setting and the overall value of the
area. We are convinced that should the zoning be changed, there will be a negative impact
on our neighborhood and this subdivision in many ways. There will be increased traffic on
our county roads, raising maintenance costs and requiring more patrols by the County
Sheriff. The zoning changes would also negatively impact the environment with
higher carbon dioxide emissions, increased air temperature, and additional water use to
sustain the population density. There are many studies by the EPA and other agencies
to support these statements.
We want to ensure the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we purchased our
home in this area. We want to preserve the value of our home for many years to come and
continue to promote not only our beautiful neighborhood but also the West Valley area in
general. Please help us and our neighbors in our efforts to accomplish these objectives.
We are requesting to be made,pware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested
party list.
ITV ne arid ekatilyttoStello
P cel # 50227-739
kathyca/43@gmail:com
• 623-229-1244

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: LaVorme Butler <lavonnelee@msn.com >
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 8:44 AM
To: ':'; Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Opposition to rezoning Russell Ranch 4, 5, &6
July 19, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive Plan
Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat # 52012007 for, originally known as Russell
Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They
do not conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning
of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the high density R1-10 which the application
is requesting.
-We purchased-our home in-Russell Ranch Phase-1 for the rural-setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we
purchased our home in this area. We are concerned for the loss in property value. We also considered this an
investment toward our retirement!
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
John R Butler
Parcel #502-27-142
Centurvtech@msn.com
18028 West Georgia a
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
1

Clinthickmanpmail.maricopa.com
rachelapplegate@mail.maricopa.gov
July 11, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th S treet, Suite 200
Phoenix, Az. 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive
Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change #Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat #52012007 for, originally known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5, and 6, high density subdivision.
The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the
comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18,
two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the high density R140 which the
application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have for traffic on
our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we
purchased our home in this area. I am also very much concerned regarding value of our home when
forclosures begin because the high density homeowners find they cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of
$200.00+ per month with rates going up in July.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
Joyce and John Harcharik
Parcel 502-27-153
aztwin@earthlink.net John@arizonadb.com
18036 W. Oregon Court
Litchfield Park, Az. 85340

To: clinthickman@mail.maricopa.gov
rachelapplegate@ mail.maricopa.gov
July 10, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning Eg. Development Board of Supervisors
Planning &Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors 84. Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for, originally known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision.
The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the
comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current
zoning of R148, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the high
density R1-10 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very much concerned
regarding value of our home when foreclosures begin because the high density homeowners
find they cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of $200.00+ per month with rates going up in J uly.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Don and Karen Menge
Parcel # 502-27-619
dmenge@cox.net
18625 W. Georgia Avenue
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340

Rachel Applegate - PLAN DEVX
From: Dale Vargas <dalevargas@hotmail.com >
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 5:19 AM
To: clinthickman@maiLmaricopa.gov ; Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Zoning omprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097
Attachments: 07 County Letter_Russell_Ranch_South.docx
To: clinthiclunan@mail.maricopa.gov
rachelapplegate@,mall.maricopa.gov
July 12, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive
Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary Mat # S2012007 for, originally
known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent
with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I
am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am
against the high density R1-10 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have for traffic on our
county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we purchased
our home in this area. I am also very much concerned regarding value of our home when foreclosures begin
because the high density homeowners find they cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of $200,00+ per month
with rates going up in July.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
Dale Vargas
Parcel # 502-27-603
Your dalevar gas (&,hotmail com
Your mailing address 18428 W Oregon Ave, Litchfield Park AZ 85340

To clinthickman@mall.maricopa.gov
rachelapplegate@mailmarlcopa.gov
July 14, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Plannin g & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zonin g Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Plannin g & Zonin g Commission:
am sendin g this letter to voice my stron g opposition of the application for the rezonin g on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Chan ge # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for, ori ginally known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, hi gh density subdivision.
The proposed chan ges are not consistent with the current zonin g. They do not conform to the
comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current
zonin g of R148, two houses per acre, which it is alread y plotted, but I am a gainst the high
density R140 which the application is re questin g .
We purchased our home for the rural settin g, I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tran quility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also ver y much concerned
regardin g value of our home when foreclosures be gin because the hi gh density homeowners
find they cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of $200.00+ per month with rates going up in Jul y .
I am requestin g to be made aware of an y public hearin g and be placed on the interested part y
list.
Sincerely,
2A J
Joseph W. Corbett
Parcel #502-27493
iwcori-4et@ n
17926 W Ore gon Ave.
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340-5215

To: clinthickman@mail.rna ricopa.corn
rachelapplegate@rnail.maricopa.gov
July 14, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Nat # 52012007 for, originally known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision.
The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the
comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current
zoning of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the high
density R1-10 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area I am also very much concerned
regarding value of our home when foreclosures begin because the high density homeowners
find they cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of $200.00+ per month with rates going up in July.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
SZAis&-114a,
Sandra K. Ament
Parcel # 502-27-100
damt58@aoLcom
5516 N. 180th Ln.
Russell Ranch
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Kathy Costello <kathycaz43®gmail.com >
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:21 PM
To: pattizaricor@mailmaricopa.gov ; Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX;
clinthickman@mail.maricopa.gov
Subject: Planning Protest
July 14, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
We are sending this letter to voice our strong opposition of the application for the
rezoning on Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change #
Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat # S2012007 for, originally known as Russell Ranch
Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision.
The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform
to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area.
We are against the high density R1-10 which the application is requesting or any other
zoning change to increase the original density of the lots zoned for this area.
We purchased our home seven years ago for the rural setting and the overall value of
the area. We are convinced that should the zoning be changed, there will be a negative
impact on our neighborhood and this subdivision in many ways. There will be increased
traffic on our county roads, raising maintenance costs and requiring more patrols by the
County Sheriff. The zoning changes would also negatively impact the environment with
higher carbon dioxide emissions, increased air temperature, and additional water use to

sustain the population density. There are many studies by the EPA and other agencies
to support these statements.
We want to ensure the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we purchased our
home in this area. We want to preserve the value of our home for many years to come
and continue to promote not only our beautiful neighborhood but also the West Valley
area in general. Please help us and our neighbors in our efforts to accomplish these
objectives.
We are requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the
interested party list.
Sincerely,
Wayne and Kathy Costello
Parcel # 502-27-739
kathycaz43©gmail.com
18548 W. Marshall Ave., Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
623-229-1244
2

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: karen mortis <karen.mortis@gmail.com >
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:15 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: high density housing
July 14, 2014
Maricopa county Department of Planning & Developernent Board of Supervisors Planning & Zoning Commission
502-44 St., Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ. 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning 8E. Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive Plan
Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Chang # Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat # S2012007 for, originally known as Russell
Ranch Phase 4,5 & 6, high density subdivision.
The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They don not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is
already plotted for. I am VERY much against the high density R1-10 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have for traffic on our county
roads, and the road in front of my house, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on
when we purchased our home in Russell Ranch. I am also very much concerned with what is going to happen with the
value of our home, when foreclosures begin because the high density homeowners find they cannot afford the EPCOR
water bill of
$200.00 plus per month! The rates are set to go up again in July!
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
Karen Mortis
Parcel # 502-27-190
karen.mortisPgmail.com
17923 W. Oregon Ave.
Litchfield Park, AZ
85340
1

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Heather Gordon <chgordon4@cox.net >
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:26 AM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 4 CPA2012012
July 15, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive Plan
Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change 4 Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat # 52012007 for, originally known as Russell
Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They
do not conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning
of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the high density R1-10 which the application
is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have for traffic on our county
roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we purchased our home in
this area. I am also very much concerned regarding value of our home when foreclosures begin because the high
density homeowners find they cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of $200.00+ per month with rates going up in July.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
Charles T Gordon Jr. and Heather L. Gordon Parcel # 502-27-595 chgordon4@cox.net
18312 West Oregon Ave.
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
1

To: clinthickman@rnail.maricopa.gov
rachelapplegate@mail.maricopa.gov
July 11, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for, originally known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision.
The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the
comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current
zoning of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the high
density R140 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Tammy Allen-May
Donald J. May
Parcel if 502-27-648
misstamz@aol.com
18326 W. Georgia Ave.
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340

To: clinthickman@mall.maricopa.gov
racheiapplegate@mail.maricopa.gov
July 11, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # 72012097, and Preliminary
Plat # 52012007 for, originally known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision.
The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the
comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current
zoning of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the high
density R1-10 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very much concerned
regarding value of our home when foreclosures begin because the high density homeowners
find they cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of $200.00+ per month with rates going up in July.
l am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
ivimmA,,41 62/Egit
Lynne Corbett
Parcel #502-27-193
Lynnegenie@yahoo.com
17926 W Oregon Ave
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340-5215

Rachel Applegate - PLAN DEVX
From: Sherree Fischer <sherree@cox.net >
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 9:47 AM
To: clinthickman@mail.rnaricopa.goy; Rachel Applegate - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Rezoning
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
To: clinthickman *,mail.maricopa.gov
rachelapplegate@mail.maricopa,gov
July 10, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive
Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat # 52012007 for, originally
known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent
with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I
am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am -
against the high density R1-10 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have for traffic on our
county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we purchased
our home in this area. I am also very much concerned regarding value of our home when foreclosures begin
because the high density homeowners find they cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of $200.00+ per month
with rates going up in July.

I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
James & Sheryl Fischer
Lot #478, Russell Ranch
fischxa,cox.net
sherree@,cox.net

To: clinthickman@tnailluaricopa.gov
rachelapplegate@rnail.maricopa.gov
July 11,2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
50244th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat ff 52012007 for, originally known as Russell Ranch Phase 4,5 & 6, high density
subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They do not
conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the
current zoning of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the
high density R1-10 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have for
traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we
planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very much concerned regarding
value of our home when foreclosures begin because the high density homeowners find they
cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of $200.00+ per month with rates going up in July.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
Daniel & Kathleen Szafranski.
Parcel # 502-27-173
Szafranskil@cox.net
18027 W Colter St
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Pauline Henry <pauline@dvcemaiLcom>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 1:18 AM
To: clinthickman@rnaiLmaricopa.com
Cc: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Zoning Issues
July 10, 2014
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors gt. Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive
Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat # 52012007 for, originally
known as Russell Ranch Phase 4, 5 & 6, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent
with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I
am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am
against the high density R1-10 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have for traffic on our
county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we
purchased our home in this area. I am also very much concerned regarding value of our home when
foreclosures begin because the high density homeowners find they cannot afford the EPCOR water bill of
$200.00+ per month with rates going up in July.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
Mr. & Mrs. L. George Henry
Parcel #502-27-274
rathergohunting2@yahoo.com
17936 W. Solano Drive, Litchfield Park, Arizona 85340

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Misstarnz@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 8:45 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Cc: thunder513@aol.com
Subject: Russell Ranch South, Maracay Homes - Neighbor Input
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Hi Ms. Applegate,
My husband and I live in the community of Savannah in Litchfield Park just south of Clearwater Farms and west of Russell
Ranch. We moved to this community for the large lots, open spaces, and ability to keep our trailer and motorized toys on
our property. We recently attended a meeting at Verrado hosted by Maracay Homes to show neighbors what their plans
are to develop the land directly east and south of Savannah against the existing community of Russell Ranch, for now
they are referring to this area as Russell Ranch South. At this meeting, I was told that you are the person who is
collecting feedback from neighboring community members, thus my email to you.
At that meeting, Maracay showed us four parcels of which only parcel #4 consisted of larger lots (113 acre or larger) for
RV's the other three parcels consisted of lots much smaller with one parcel having only a few larger lots (closer to
Perryville Rd) but still not accommodating to people who have RV's. This is not acceptable. We didn't move from the
inner city of Phoenix where homes are built very close to each other so that we could be in the same situation in
Savannah. What drew us so far west was that the lot sizes are huge and the houses are far enough apart from each
other that neighbors can't hear what's going on in the lot next to them. We understand that progress is going to happen,
but the plan that Maracay has for the open lot next to us is not conducive to the lifestyle of the adjacent neighborhoods;
Savannah, Clearwater Farms, Russell Ranch, and Camelback Garden Farms.
Maracay decreased their original plan by about 100 fewer lots, but it is not enough. What we would like to see is for all
four parcels to be zoned like parcel #4.. .larger lots with RV parking accommodation. Additionally, we would like to see
more greenbelt areas. While it is nice for Maracay to agree not to build two-story homes on the parcel along the southern
part of Savannah, what would be even nicer is if Maracay would put a greenbelt between the two neighborhoods, which
would allso space between the homes and separate the communities. A walking path between the communities would
also be nice.
As it is planned now, the new community is slotted for about 333 homes, which means that there will be approximately
600 more vehicles (or more) in the area and about 1000-1500 more people which is too many homes, too many cars, and
too many people. Please pass along our comments and concerns to the Board of Supervisors when they meet to
determine the final outcome of the new Maracay community. Basically, we prefer much fewer homes on larger lots to
accommodate RV parking and more greenbelts.
If you could add us to the list of who is kept informed on progress on this lot to include when the BOS will meet about it,
we would really appreciate it.
Thank you for time,
Tammy Allen-May & DJ May
Savannah, Lot 89
18326W Georgia Ave
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
602-686-3093
1

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Jeffrey Bleau <jbleau@cannon-wendtcom>
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 11:53 AM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Russell Ranch South Development - Adjacent Neighborhood Revision Request
Rachel,
I received your contact information for comments regarding the proposed Russell Ranch South development.
Myself and fellow residents of the Carnelback Garden Farms community at the Southwest corner of
Camelback/Perryville Rd are strongly opposed to the lot sizes presented for the Russell Ranch South development.
Our community is currently comprised of (65) 1-acre lots, and proportionately sizes homes for those lots. Other
adjacent communities of Savannah and the current Russell Ranch have similar situations. This lot and home proportion
style has been a staple for these (3) communities and has created unique value and choice for people desiring to live in
this area.
Creating a new community of small lots placed quite literally in the middle of these (3) communities provides a
disservice and loss of the sense-of-community to the current neighborhoods. Additionally, whomever may move into
the new neighborhood would most likely feel disconnected and economically disadvantaged to the community
surrounding them.
To lessen the economic impact to the current residents, strengthen the community of the entire area, and preserve
neighborhood continuity, we would like to see Russell Ranch South be constructed with the lot sizes at 1/2 acre (21,000
sqft) or larger for all lots in the new neighborhood.
Thank-you for your time in receiving our comments, please feel free to contact me if needed.
-Jeff
1

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: C h <chol1ey2@hotrnail.corn>
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 8:20 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Proposed Rezoning of Russell Ranch South
Good Morning Ms. Applegate,
The purpose of my email is to express my concern and strong objection to the proposed rezoning of Russell
Ranch South.
As a member of the Savannah Community, my home is located at 18422W. Montebello Ave., Litchfield Park,
AZ 85340. My sons and I have lived in our home since 2009. In selecting a location for our home, there were
certain qualifications that were not negotiable for us. This include, but not limited to:
1. A community with a small time atmosphere
2. Limited traffic
3. Spacious lots
4. Limited man made lighting to interfere with the beauty of God's natural night lighting
5. A location that would hold it's value
The above list is just a partial list of why I selected the Savannah Community as a location for my family to live
and retire in. As a single income family, my home is my most valued investment. I am extremely concern with
the current proposal that is on the table for the rezoning of Russell Ranch South. Decreasing the lot size will
increase the number of homes in the area, increase the amount of traffic and bring with it all other issues
associated with an increased number of people in the same amount of living space. I am disappointed and
have no confidence in statements made by the developer that this rezoning will not decrease our property
value and the down play of the additional traffic in the area.
This is our community, our homes we moved in this area partially due to the size of the lots and the number
of homes that were originally projected to be built in the area. If I would have know of this proposed
rezoning, I can assure you that I would have continue my search for a community that would provide the
above items that I have referenced. Savannah has become my community and my home. It is my desire to
reserve the current zoning requirements that are in place for the community. I understand the concept of
"progress", but at some point, those in charge have to recognize the cost of this "progress" and stand by the
original zoning for the community that was passed. i asked those in charge to put themselves in the shoes of
our homeowners, would they still consider passing this proposed rezoning?
Please forward my concern and objection of this proposed rezoning of Russell Ranch South to the appropriate
individuals/Board that have the authority to prevent this from moving forward.
Sincerely,

Carol Holley
18422 W. Montebello Ave.
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
623 850 0857
2

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: don goldman <dsgoldman27@msn.com >
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 3:18 PM
To: Patty Zaricor - PLANDEVX; Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX; Max Wilson - DIST4X
Subject: Zoning Case Z2012097/S2012007 & Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA2012012
Ms. Zaricor, Ms. Applegate and Mr. Wilson,
As homeowners in the adjoining subdivision affected by the referenced zoning and plan amendment, we urge
the rejection of the proposed changes. The proposed zoning and plan amendment will adversely affect the
market value of the existing homes, .the additional traffic in the area will stress the existing street and road
infrastructure, and stress the existindpublic school system.
There will be a large representation of persons opposing these changes at future public meetings.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Don and Sheri Goldman
Parcel #502-27-814
18515 West Montebello Avenue
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
1

Planning & Development ONE
Department ST P
SIIOP
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
DATE: January 22, 2015
FROM: Rachel Applegate, Senior Planner, Planning and Zoning Div on
RE: Russell Ranch South - CPA2012012 & Z2012097
Opposition
After the printing of the Russell Ranch staff report, staff received additional letters in
opposition to the project and signed petitions in opposition. This summary includes
copies of the correspondence and signed petitions to the project.
The total count of correspondence received to date is as follows:
1 - letter from the Litchfield Elementary School District in support of the 333 homes.
44- opposition letters
523 - Petition signatures in opposition
Please note some of the letters in opposition from property owners are also listed in the
petition.
Proposed additional conditions requested by the Applicant - Z2012097
1. There shall be no two (2) story homes along the lots directly adjacent to the
existing platted lots along the southern boundary of the Savannah subdivision.
2. There shall be no roadway extension from the existing 182nd Avenue into the
proposed project.
3. The applicant shall work with the Maricopa County Department of Transportation
to determine if traffic calming features can be incorporated in the development
of the design of 181st Avenue adjacent to the project. The design and approval
shall occur at the approval of the preliminary plat.
4. The applicant shall work with the Maricopa County Drainage staff to determine if
a restrictive gate, drainage feature can be installed at the south end of the
Savannah open space in order to prevent residents from traversing the drainage
area into the Savannah open space.
January 22, 2016 PZ Hearing
Page 1 of 7

Planning & Development ONE
Department ST :P
SHOP
5. There shall be no view fences along the back yards of the lots facing west
towards the Savannah subdivision.
6. The applicant shall determine if at the time of preliminary plat submittal if an
alternative placement of the southernmost roadway access to 181st Avenue can
be relocated so as not to directly line up with W. Medlock Drive.
7. There shall be no two (2) story homes directly adjacent to platted lots within
Russell Ranch.
Staff recommends the Commission include the requested conditions as part of the
Zoning Case - Z2012097. Listed below are the revised staff recommended conditions
with inclusion of the conditions showed as new text (underlined and bolded).
Staff recommends the Commission motion for approval subject to Conditional Zoning of
Chapter 3 Article 304.6 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance with conditions "a" -
"y" of Z2012097:
Provided the following conditions are met:
a. Development of the site shall comply with the Zoning Exhibit entitled
"Russell Ranch South RUPD Case No. 12012097", consisting of one full-size
sheet, dated September 4, 2014, and stamped received September 15,
2014, except as modified by the following conditions.
b. Development of the site shall be in conformance with the Narrative
Report entitled "Russell Ranch South Residential Unit Plan of Development
(RUPD)", consisting of 80 pages, dated September 11, 2014, and stamped
received September 15, 2014, except as modified by the following
conditions.
c. The zoning approval is conditional per Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance, Article 304.6, and ARS §11-814. Construction shall commence
within five (5) years from Board of Supervisors approval. The developer of
the property shall submit to the Department a certified statement of
compliance prior to the expiration of any time limits imposed by the
Board. If the certified statement of compliance is not filed or the
Development independently determines that the property has not been
improved for the use for which it was conditionally approved, a public
hearing shall be set before the Commission. The findings and
recommendation of the Commission shall be forwarded to the Board of
January 22, 2015 PZ Hearing
Page 2 of 7

Planning & Development ONE
Department ST P
SUOF
Supervisors for public hearing to determine compliance with the schedule
of development, grant an extension, or cause the property to revert to its
former zoning classification. Notification by registered mail of both the
Commission hearing and the Board hearing shall be sent to the owner
and applicant who requested the rezoning. Notice of public hearing shall
be as set forth in Chapter 3, Section 304., Article 304.2.
d. The following R1-10 RUPD standards shall apply (see RUPD table within
narrative report for footnotes):
1. Front Yard: 20' front loaded garage or 10' side loaded or livable
area of dwelling unit
2. Side Yard: 5'
3. Rear Yard: 20'
4. Lot Area: 6,875 sq. ft.
5. Lot Width: 55'
6. Average Lot Area per Dwelling Unit: 12,500 sq. ft.
7. Lot Coverage: 55%
8. Accessory Buildings - Distance to Side Street on Corner Lots: 10'
e. The following R1-18 RUPD standards shall apply (See RUPD table within
narrative report for footnotes):
1. Front Yard: 20' front loaded garage or 10' side loaded or livable
area of dwelling unit
2. Side Yard: 5'
3. Street Side Yard: 10'
4. Rear Yard: 20'
5. Lot Area: 13,500 sq. ft.
6. Lot Width: 100'
7. Lot Coverage: 55%
8. Accessory Buildings Distance to Side Street on Corner Lots: 10'
January 22, 2015 PZ Hearing
Page 3 of 7

Planning & Development ONE
Department ST P
SHOP
f. The following Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)
conditions shall apply:
1 The applicant shall provide a total half-width of right-of-way for the
following roadway:
Camelback Road 65 feet
Perryville Road 65 feet
181st Avenue 30 feet for west side
181st Avenue Minimum 18 feet east side of the
Monument line (8' for additional
pavement to make two lanes/two way
road and 10 for clear zone distance)
All such dedications shall be in fee and free of all liens and
encumbrances. Prior to acceptance of such dedication, the
applicant shall provide the County an owner's title insurance policy
issued to the County, the MCDOT environmental checklist and any
and all other requirements as set forth in the "MCDOT Right-of-Way
Dedications Reference Guide". Until Maricopa County has
accepted said dedication, all responsibilities, including but not
limited to maintenance and repair for the property to be
dedicated shall be that of the applicant.
Right-of-Way dedication shall occur within six (6) months of
approval of this request by the Board of Supervisors and prior to
zoning clearance.
2. Provide access easement for portions of box culvert structures
that's outside of the right-of-way limits for MCDOT inspection
purposes.
3. Roadway reviews of planning and/or zoning cases are for
conceptual design only and does not represent final design
approval nor shall it entitle applicants to future designs that are not
in conformance with current MC DOT Design Standard.
4. Based upon the conceptual design nature of the preliminary plat
plans submitted, changes to the site layout and /or a reduction in
the number of building lots may be necessitated by the final
engineering design of the subdivision drainage infrastructure.
January 22, 2015 PZ Hearing
Page 4 of 7

Planning & Development ONE
Department ST P
10P
5. All interior streets within the proposed development are to be
constructed to minimum County standards.
g. The following Drainage Review conditions shall apply:
Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual
design only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it
entitle applicants to future designs that are not in conformance
with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and
the Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards.
2. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance
with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and
current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the
time of application for construction.
3. Prior to issuance of any permits for development of the site, the
applicant/property owner shall obtain the necessary
encroachment permits from the Maricopa County Department of
Transportation (MCDOT) for landscaping or other improvements in
the right-of-way.
h. The following Flood Control District (FCD) conditions shall apply:
1 A Floodplain Use Permit must be obtained from the Floodplain
Management and Services Division of the Flood Control District.
2. Approval of the Conditional Letter of Map Revision by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will be required prior to
Flood Control District recommending approval of the Final Plat.
All outdoor lighting shall conform to the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance.
k. Development of the site shall be in compliance with all applicable
Maricopa County Air Quality rules and regulations.
An archeological survey shall be submitted to and approved by the
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office prior to issuance of a grading
permit. The applicant must contact the State office prior to initiating
disturbance of the site. The applicant shall provide the Planning and
Development Department with written proof of compliance with this
stipulation.
January 22, 2015 PZ Hearing
Page 5 of 7

Planning & Development ONE
Department ST P
SHOP
m. Prior to Final Plat approval, developer(s) and/or builder(s) shall establish
emergency fire protection services, covering all real property contained
within the project area during course of construction and shall obtain a
'will serve' letter substantiating coverage from the appropriate Fire District,
Department or Company servicing the site.
n. All habitable buildings constructed within this subdivision shall be
constructed to attain a noise reduction level as per ARS § 28-8482(B).
o. Amendments to the site plan and narrative report shall be processed as a
revised application in accordance with Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance Article 304.9.
p. Noncompliance with the conditions of approval will be treated as a
violation in accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
Further, noncompliance of the conditions of approval may be grounds for
action in accordance with Chapter 3 (Conditional Zoning).
q. Non-compliance with the regulations administered by the Maricopa
County Environmental Services Department, Maricopa County
Department of Transportation, Drainage Review Division, Planning and
Development Department, or the Flood Control District of Maricopa
County may be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as
set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
r. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in
value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to
noncompliance with conditions.
s. There shall be no two (2) story homes along the lots directly adjacent to
the existing plaited lots along the southern boundary of the Savannah
subdivision.
t. There shall be no roadway extension from the existing 182nd Avenue into
the proposed project.
u. The applicant shall work with the Maricopa County Department of
Transportation to determine if traffic calming features can be incorporated
in the development of the design of 181st Avenue adjacent to the project.
The design and approval shall occur at the approval of the preliminary
plat.
January 22, 2015 P7 Hearing
Page 6 of 7

Planning & Development ONE
Department ST P
SHOP
v. The applicant shall work with the Maricopa County Drainage staff to
determine if a restrictive aate, drainage feature can be installed at the
south end of the Savannah open space in order to prevent residents from
traversing the drainaae area into the Savannah open space.
w. There shall be no view fences along the back yards of the lots facing west
towards the Savannah subdivision.
L The applicant shall determine if at the time of preliminary plat submittal if
an alternative placement of the southernmost roadway access to 181st
Avenue can be relocated so as not to directly line up with W. Medlock
Drive.
L There shall be no two (2) story homes directly adjacent to platted lots
within Russell Ranch.
January 22, 2015 PZ Hearing
Page 7 of 7

LITCHFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT #79
272 E Sagebrush Street
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
623-535-6000
Fax 623-935-1448
www.1esd.k12.az.us
April 9, 2014
Kurt A Jones, AICP
Tiffany & Bosco P.A.
2525 E Camelback Rd
Phoenix, AZ 85016
RE: CPA2012012 & Z2012097
The Litchfield Elementary School District feels there will be adequate room for the anticipated increase in students
from 333 homes anticipated to be built in the Russell Ranch Community if our District's plans to build a new school
in the Verrado community for the 2015/2016 school year is completed and the next Bond request passes in the
next election.
Thank you,
Dan Ensign
Director of Construction

1/8/15
Ms. Rachel Applegate
do Maricopa Planning & Development Department
Case #CPA2012012
When I moved into Russell Ranch in 2002 the subdivision advertised 1/3, 1/2, and 1 acre
lots. The community is based on those plans and greed is the only reason to change land
use designation from Large Lot Residential to Small Lot Residential on the Russell
Ranch South 136 site located near 181 st and Camelback Rd.
Therefore, I formally protest any residential lot changes to my community.
Howard Thorpe
18050 W. Denton Ave.
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340-5206
Parcel #502-29-145
Parcel #502-27-125

1/8/15
Ms. Rachel Applegate
c/o Maricopa Planning & Development Department
Case #Z2012097
When I moved into Russell Ranch in 2002 the subdivision advertised 1/3, 1/2, and 1 acre
lots. The community is based on those plans and greed is the only reason to change
zoning for Russell Ranch South when the current community is based on RI-18 RUPD.
Therefore, I formally protest any zoning changes to my community.
Howard Thorpe
18050 W. Denton Ave.
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340-5206
Parcel #502-29-145
Parcel #502-27-125

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Jason Bates <jbates.az@gmail.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 5:47 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Russell Ranch South Rezoning Opposition
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
To: rachelapplegate@mail.maricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Regards,
Jason Bates
Tax Parcel # 502-29-134
Address: 18131 W. Palo Verde Ct, Litchfield Park, AZ 85340

Rachel Applegate - PLAN DEVX
From: MITCHEL DUKATT <mcdukatt@yahoo.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:07 AM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Pertaining to zoning for Russell Ranch South case #Z2012097
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
January 14, 2015
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission;
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat
# S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of RI-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home invasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing. My home backs up to 181th Avenue and I am
very concerned for the type of homes that will be built and the access streets that will cause large amounts of traffic on
181st Avenue behind my home.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Mitchel Dukatt
Tax Parcel #502-27-1692
1

To: rachelapplegate@mail.maricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # 52012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R148, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R140
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. {have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Tax Parcel # So -T__
Address: -
\6602.1 kt\l. Covverz
pp,a3L,
e)534-0

Rachel Applegate PLANDEVX
From: Dennis Stanley <denstanley@yahoo.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 6:13 AM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and
Preliminary
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
To: rachelappleqatemail.maricopa.gov
January 15, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 4 CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # 52012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of RI-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Dennis E. Stanley
Tax Parcel 4 502-29-202 4
PS Unfortunately, I will be out of the state on 1/22/2015 and will not be able to attend the meeting.
1.

To: rachelapplegate@mail.maricopa.gov
January 14,2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
50244th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa thunty for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
VI
Tax Parcel #
Address:
1 %CS
R2, ?f'D 3 It 0

CASE #: CPA2012012 - Russell Ranch South
Planning & Zoning Commission: Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 9:30 AM
Board of Supervisors (B05): Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 9:00 AM
Board of Supervisors Auditorium 205 W. Jefferson Street, Phoenix, AZ
RecilleOL: Change the land ese deslonation of the Mite Tank/Grand Mantic Area flan horn Large Lot Residehtlal
cl.u./ae.) to Small Lot Re_dentfal (2—s d.ufae..) for Russell Bench South, The Intl= rate rolls1str, of approximately 136
atre5 and In located approximately at the northwest corner of 181st Ave, and Cornell:nal, err. (in Glendale area).
in notice in being sea to you Because property listed Ira your
name a located withIn 301 feet of the alto noted Wawa, or you
have otherwise expressed an Interest In this cast. if you have an
Interest 10 thls request you may sizeak I person at tl le hearing, Or by
slang to Rachel Applegate Cit, Murlcepu County Planning and
pacelaparant Depaltment at the e-lrlat! ed&ass tstcd boise , cc the
*in witless Oiled on the ;ever:4 side of this mkt. If you wish to
prOtest this reque,,,t, you must Ille III wilting with this Department by
.4130 p.m on the hiday odor to the 1105 healing.
vegrrrAraric000zziplosia4a8t/et'nes/OrfrOt.asrp:
If the ComrnEslon recommends approval, this Item will be placed oil the consent agenda at the 13CIS hearing, If an
appeal IS received within L.0 calendar dovsfolidwIng Crirrinanitslon hearing, the item will be plated on the regular
agenda at the BUS hearing. Popenliof CoalmIsslort Recommendation can be filed with the ;v.-peeing & Development
pepartmesit at the ramming website: wyri ng2r4r.,sezrzmi_3_, n' ,Lcsikernmrrnieratlaur-aX
NON/ Th/SiNO.I wi//be heard attire rtertavallable ireurfag if either having is cancelled gra quorum is
lost.
602.372.0318 • rachelarmlegateamoil.maricgmcinv

Rachel Applegate - PLAN DEVX
From: Jimradltd@Aol.Co <jimradltd@aol.com >
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:07 PM
To: Rachel Applegate PLANDEVX
Subject: Russell Ranch South
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
January 14,2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors Planning &Zoning Commission 502 44th Street, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change #
Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat # S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning.
They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of RI-18, one to two houses per acre,
which it is already plotted, but i am against the small lot residential R140 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the
tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding the amount of recent crime in our area
consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft, community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly missing a child, attempt
of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
James Palmer and Jolanta Romanowski
17918W san Juan Ave.
Litchfield Park,AZ 85340
PID 502-27-294

To: rachelapplegate@mallanaricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012 4. Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Hat # 52012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break4ns, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police In our area to handle all the problems we have been facing,
am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely, ic/ ut.)77 1.44
Tax Parcel # 5-6 7— MY
Address: 6ZeA/I51 (7±:
ikple #2, sf-2c/
4 liC6/ F

To rachelapplegate@mail.maricopagov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ S5008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
i am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment ft CPA2012012, Zone Change t Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area, I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
-2- I
Tax Parcel # tC12.- 22-7. te>•
Address: t ern 7,0 %AD cal--r
pea. gs v- 3 el V
LA-k-c_L-sc

January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
50244th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change 472012097, and Preliminary
Plat # 52012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
IVIaricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Tax Parcel # 6 2 -V-- P783
Address: /.760,6-- 1,0 , aye,-
[iiJict gyy) AQ

To: rachelapplegate@mailmaricopagov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
50244th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # $2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Tax Parcel # 0.2?-- Zde"
Address: j
4//g1/7070 "Aeo AO, ,C.5V10

To rachelapplegate@mall.maricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat ft 52012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning, They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R148, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mall theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list,
38r3vimmix
Tax Parcel #
Address:
1W) Meal oe.A, 'Or
Liko‘Cie‘a, 0at PiL 53q0

To: rachelapplegate@mail.rnaricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricapa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
i am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R148, one to two
houses per acre, which it Is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R140
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the Interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Tax Parcel # 4y- - /59
Address:
0-16)4 Ar Tr'ped-ki.
tes-ato

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Lynn Hutcherson <blhutch31@cox.net >
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:01 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Fwd: Russell Ranch South
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Lynn Hutcherson <b1hutch31@cox.net>
Date: January 14,2015 at 8:29:07 PM MST
To: "rachelapplegat(&,mail.maricopa.gov " <rachelapplegat@mail.maricopa.gov>
Subject: Russell Ranch South

To: rachelapplegate@mail.marlcopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat it S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men Jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Tax Parcel #
Address:
Our lot number is - 415
Our Tax Parcel Number is-502-27-126
Address is 18049 W Denton Ave.
Name: Mr and Mrs Charles W. Hutcherson

To: rachelapplegate@mail.maricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 446 Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # 52012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. 1 am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
'
/41 671-8.-Zet
Tax Parcel # /2 3 —
Address: P/- 12_4 4' (.3 /9--V C'41-1 ) M12__X.) 1,t2.e-5-

Charles R & Judith A Reading
Email: jreading@cox.net
Telephone: 623-243-5807
January 15, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
We are sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the
rezoning on Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change #
Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat # 52012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density
subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They
do not conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area we are
NOT opposed to the current zoning of RI-18, one to two houses per acre, which it is
already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential RI-10 which the application
is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this
will have for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the
tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we purchased our home in this area.
I am also very concerned regarding the amount of recent crime in our area
consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft, community walls torn down 3
times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly missing a child, auto
break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences and no police in our area to handle all
the problems we are already facing.
We are requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the
interested party list.
Tax Parcel # 502-27-1051
Address: 18011 W Marshall Court
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Ed Artz <ejartz@gmail.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:41 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLAN DEVX
Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and
Preliminary Plat # 52012007
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors Planning &
Zoning Commission 502 44th Street, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am strongly opposed to the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive Plan Amendment #
CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat # 52012007 for Russell Ranch
South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning
They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT
opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two houses per acre, which it is already
comprehended in the plans, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10 which the application is
requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have for
traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we
planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding the
amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft, community
walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly missing a child,
attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences and no police in our
area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
If you decide to go ahead with higher density housing lots, please consider stipulating to the
applicant that sufficient amenities be required in the plans (and implemented) to create an attractive
environment for those residents. Things like a water pad, basketball courts, greenway areas where
kids can play football/baseball, swings, etc. to keep kids in this neighborhood. If nothing is done to
this effect, we will have even more kids invading our recreational areas. And destroying our
landscaping and irrigation.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list.
Sincerely,
Edward I. Artz

Tax Parcel # 502-27-333
Address: 17942 W Montebello Ave

To: rachelapplegate@mail.maricopagoy
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # 22012097, and Preliminary
Plat # 52012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-13, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-1.0
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setling have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Address: o A/1 -77-4
.1.J0,51.-e ("r/( A-S4-1b

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Sandy A. Lindstrom <Slinds@cox.net >
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 5:26 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Russell Ranch South -Rezoning
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
January 15, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street Suite 200
Phoenix AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
We are sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on Comprehensive
Plan Amendment #CPA2012012, Zone Change #Z2012097, and Preliminary Plat #52012007 for Russell Ranch
South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are not consistent with the current zoning. They do not
conform to the comprehensive plan for Maricopa County for this area. We are NOT opposed to the current
zoning of R1-18, one to two houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but we are against the small lot
residential R1-10 which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. We have concerns for what impact this will have for traffic on
our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we planned on when we
purchased our home in this area. We are also very concerned regarding the amount of recent crime in our
area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft, community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown
through a bedroom window narrowly missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins men jumping
over backyard fences and no police in our area to handle all the problems we are facing.
We are requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party list. We both
work full time and are not able to attend hearings during the week. We strongly feel that because of this fact,
this email should represent our opposition to the rezoning request as if we were at the hearing in person.
Sincerely,
Kerry and Sandy Lindstrom
Tax Parcel #502-29-153
Address: 18121 W Rancho Drive
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
1

To: racheiapplegate@mail.maricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting. I am against the name of Russell Ranch South.
We purchased our property for the rural setting with the surrounding zoning of R1-18 and
R1-43 expecting the zoning to stay that way. I have concerns for what impact this will have for
traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle we
planned on when we purchased in this area. I am also, very concerned regarding the amount of
recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft, community walls
torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly missing a child, attempt
of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences and no police in our area
to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Donna Thomson
Tax Parcel # 502-27-265
Address: 14867W Cameron Dr
Surprise, AZ 85379

To: rachelapplegate@mall.maricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
50244th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Nat 452012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed change S are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but t am against the small lot residential R1-10
which tlie application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Tax Parcel #
Address: riot AV
PC7-- as-aLto

To: rachelapplegate@nriail.maricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
iViaricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
50244th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 8500B
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission;
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Marioopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R148, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on out county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list.
Sincerely,
Tax Parcel #
Address:
rOfi it-Age.'

To: rachelappiegate@maiLmaricopa.gov
January 14, 2015
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change ft Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
We purchased our home for the rural setting. I have concerns for what impact this will have
for traffic on our county roads, lighting, emergency services and the tranquility of the lifestyle
we planned on when we purchased our home in this area. I am also very concerned regarding
the amount of recent crime in our area consisting of auto theft, home evasions, mail theft,
community walls torn down 3 times, a rock thrown through a bedroom window narrowly
missing a child, attempt of child abduction, auto break-ins, men jumping over backyard fences
and no police in our area to handle all the problems we have been facing.
I am requesting to be made aware of any public hearing and be placed on the interested party
list
Sincerely,
Tax Parcel # -3 t2 3 414 Q 8 g Pcm.e.1 44_4
Address: 5816 AJ: gor-et •
kikV-k-cte 1q z 853 116

name As As We
SIGNATURES significant property property subdivision, the
15e1-16e1(A "Russell
impact owners owners, undersigned,
Ranch on application
COLLECTED nue___s SIGNATURE we we PETITION
South" emergency are STRONGLY
BY: / / as also purchased #Z2012097
11? PRINT requested and concerned & OPPOSE TO
v`. NAME police property
by with in 52012007, the
the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
applicant. for property area Case of
this for the
CO rural values the #CPA2012012. acres
-a7)- ,50--R-7-6/6 PARCEL area rural COUNTY
# and devaluating, setting The North of
LOT the and present STOP
impact Luke larger Came!back
i 1 g igW I ge of Air lots. zoning & THE
gl-b:7 1-t(R-77 6 /to Force This of East
CO. to., 60, e. overcrowding air the of
ee, I Co Or Or MAILING space rezoning surrounding Perryville REZONING
j-ief -le/ €.r-fin— ADDRESS in our hazards, will
Av-e_ schools. known OF
el--4-. 0_07L.L. 6-2— increased compromise neighborhoods as
DATE: We Russell
also vehicle our are Z2012097
Ranch
strongly traffic community zoned Phase &
Eb&k-eipi CITY
i/ & oppose and R1-18, 4, 5,
STATE the accident tranquility much & 6 S2012007
-k.. use and larger to a
of hazards, high
ZIP the lifestyles. parcels.
CODE density

the hazards, lifestyles. parcels. density We the
SIGNATURES name
As As
"Russell significant property subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED ------ SIGNATURE Ranch property
impact owners owners, application PETITION
BY: "Plva), i South" on we STRONGLY
PRINT as emergency we are TO
(4e• also purchased #Z2012097 OPPOSE
,---, NAME requested
d Alor-a-ikz, by and concerned property & the MARICOPA
.f, the police S2012007, rezoning
applicant. services with in this of
41-6'`.-- our area Case the
; AT? PARCEL for this property for acres COUNTY
r -577 # rural the #CPA2012012. North
values rural of
IS' LOT area and setting The Came!back STOP
the devaluating, and present & THE
//// impact larger East
>it of Luke lots. zoning of
MAILING Air This of the Perryville REZONING
D;-.--z,/z overcrowding Force
ADDRESS air rezoning surrounding known
/lye in space will as OF
DATE: our hazards, Russell
schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
We increased Ranch
CITY also our are Phase &
& strongly vehicle community zoned 4, 5,
STATE traffic R1-18, & 6 S2012007
oppose to a
and tranquility much R1-6,
ZIP the use accident and larger high
CODE of

the hazards, lifestyles. parcels, density We
SIGNATURES name the
J As
OS r ° "Russell significant As subdivision, undersigned,
tg" 4<(lajo-PA property property
COLLECTED afra SIGNATURE Ranch impact owners, PETITION
owners application STRONGLY
BY: el 1.6,n / South on we we
PRINT as emergency are TO
(7,14(rt5611 NAME requested also purchased #Z2012097 OPPOSE
1/9—/--1 0-6-1_ and & the
c—P-- by the police concerned property rezoning MARICOPA
Sixick in 52012007,
44,7 applicant. services with this of
.5.-- our area Case the
3D- ST4-4:---4 PARCEL for this property for acres COUNTY
133 133 # rural the #CPA2012012. North
values rural of
3(7 'Ci 3 36x f-5----7- LOT area setting The Camelback STOP
and
a - o f (1 i2 (5-)A5 the devaluating, and present
0t96c1/par- 2 d 0.,2/ -3 b-.7 5 ?f9 impact larger & East THE
.ed, - iq t...• c)vv. ocery of Luke Lots. zoning of
(76( ? ICdi- 1....) n, co-' MAILING Air of
,4a, 14 I e4. 6 . Force This the Perryville REZONING
N39r e431/,-.9,_ >ZP-4 /4-2_ overcrowding air
gS.--39 75 ADDRESS space rezoning surrounding known
Act AV in our will as OF
DATE: - Qi- c.57( =9-5-:yg.s---- hazards, Russell
schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
Goo '----- We increased Ranch
&Ole/12_4.07_ acodrak_ CITY also our are Phase &
elciewgr & vehicle zoned 4,
strongly community S.
4-5 STATE traffic R1-18, & 6 52012007
oppose and to a
the tranquility much R1-6,
t9S-3r- &WT. vs-fl-s- ZIP use accident and larger high
CODE of

the hazards, lifestyles. parcels. density We
SIGNATURES 7 4'. yt name the
1 --51)‘1r1 As As
0_014 A4fr "Russell significant property subdivision, undersigned,
j14, 0914ari-)70,eie-- property
COLLECTED ti‘-e At (PC) SIGNATURE Ranch impact owners, PETITION
1 owners application STRONGLY
BY: __ / South" on we we
IF 01 21- ./40714/ PRINT as are TO
fit Diairi' emergency purchased #Z2012097 OPPOSE
0 "--11tA NAME requested also
Vf)W , Sl-firl, Sheiday, OD and & the
V6I_CCAT" A J by police concerned property rezoning MARICOPA
, 6 the in 52012007,
1( , (-)( e,511e\gba.--- applicant. services with this of
_56;L" k SbX- our area Case the
,.)---3°- 5b)---33-111 SDZ-30 'co?-30.--IFI ,5-.4--3b PARCEL for property for acres COUNTY
'30111 this the #CPA2012012. North
3Celt '77 -ni "3 la,to QIN # rural values rural of
36o 3w 3,3 as- 36.5- 30 ' 31 b 3/0 ii LOT area setting The Camelback STOP
and devaluating,
/8.,,,,9 oq-ili i7%3 -7 t /o00 /TX° /79F-6 the and present & THE
tfge,2---- 9F7 impact Luke larger East
N .., t IN, („0 vi of Air lots. zoning of
, 4 6 it) MAILING of
,6,101, Sail Sas __iis, Force This the Perryville REZONING
YO 4f_ $e - g Se s-Kec overcrowding air
PI, /).--C I I, D At ADDRESS space rezoning surrounding known
PN1__ 4,4-- -kcie . 3 (-% De in will as OF
DATE: (- Dr: our hazards, Russell
schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
Ow _ 51( i a w 4' We increased Ranch
aeroVw'eL c)oopti a.e Gyooltov ' 66,6q0PA,..- ,j also our are Phase &
J 0 •k..1 _(14,td-,k,Aear -e Q ye, * CITY & vehicle zoned 4,
edt-t_. etv 4 ,,-- STATE strongly community 5, & S2012007
4L-7-- Az CZ_ 74 X e, 4 traffic R1-18, 6 to
41.- k _7", oppose and a
tranquility much R1-6,
S5 g5-3q. 8-c5325 g-si rc.- 3 ZIP the use accident and larger high
$17,i &Ysqs or 9 CODE of
0 5- c--

the We
hazards, lifestyles. parcels. density the
SIGNATURES - r#, \ name
IP 41Ir* ( As As
I Alou,... "Russell significant property subdivision, undersigned,
- 1r 11,4-6 property
COLLECTED i SIGNATURE Ranch impact PETITION
1 owners owners, application STRONGLY
BY: C____:\r\YI I South" on we
. , N In- PRINT as emergency we are TO
4'`.... \c. purchased Z2012097 OPPOSE
NAME requested also
7/ \ \ greirl- Ri-\--11 and & the
by concerned property MARICOPA
the police S2012007, rezoning
,),, kAISP , with in of
applicant. services our this Case the
5,),..- sza- for area acres
400 --aiL 44g1.. .27) PARCEL this property far COUNTY
;.---- the #CPA2012012. North
-5-71 # rural values rural of
za p ,,,,_..76,200m?,--,\ ge5-1 11 LOT area setting The STOP
and Came!back
ii Vs i g4 the devaluating, and present
Le3a7 3 52ert & THE
I i impact Luke larger East
\,(A. to w, of lots. zoning of
(4), - MAILING Air of
Force This the Perryville REZONING
vii7)4-Qi overcrowding
kV Deij-wi J,J\ce..Acie ADDRESS air rezoning surrounding known
--m."'- • 2 e,(i in space
A 9 our will as OF
DATE: A Ak,e. a k hazards, Russell
1 schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
Ranch
A 4, Lip, We increased
1i, CITY also our are Phase &
-0 - r r f, & vehicle community zoned 4,
ti strongly 5,
A STATE traffic R1-18, & 6 52012007
12,4 oppose to a
I( and tranquility much R1-6,
ZIP the
853e4 ',9-3140 use accident and larger high
CODE of
4

Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES ,,, „....4.4..r.— ' 5 on the
t- /co' South" we we
e7,:lbii e----kiLl:C2,2......-/ -,e--d.2.---,• 5,\14 Clnd %r:12,Nti-e' _ are subdivision, undersigned,
r\ -Io et---. A r as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED ,C. ç--)
.15'60—' t 1 , R,.. e'-. L-iii--- SIGNATURE requested and PETITION
BY: / I N o 5 -R.,,...44.--,ca . .' kt, concerned property application STRONGLY
edjaleiCt 8 rire—A. . f i-..k.0,v,if / by police
ez".--4(i-,---- ag " X 4 4 t PRINT the with in TO
(-----, — f(-- -'4 L.LtrA, Ni applicant services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
----- 0 41VIE area
I • 6 Pvi for property for & the
' 1 this the MARICOPA
i-Pfri Ak rezoning
rural values rural S2012007.
of
area setting The the
57))'- 51;-- ''l 50,- and devaluating, acres
576),....a.--) 6?--4 PARCEL the and present COUNTY
- 43 a---1-5- X-44 ,5-10 2.--2-ly # impact Luke larger North
id)3 I -7,S`'. zoning of
III 4/ of Air lots. STOP
/ 9/ '9 6, '3 g -2- LOT Force This of Came!back
the
l 1?-1-t( / 1 / 1 overcrowding air
\5120 '' py2 iy kc rezoning & THE
E11,--2-.) -4..-:\,-Q ty 2.-.. c,..--2 s553 space surrounding East
\ -7 3 in will of
Lt7 _41-6e1cf Li-) frv- 6,.." j Pvt our hazards,
0 cc, 0 - 1A-) , d ,i)„ AAL TVIAILING Perryville REZONING
DATE: '-'-'4-a -) CC-f-AL /Ili, g--c- 0 / schools. compromise neighborhoods
P-e 0 neWle /J) ADDRESS increased
(): rr: ,--...-/-- 6-.2,),) ovi 7 We our known
f 'r--. 5 also vehicle are as OF
pee_ 6, iv
S>5.3(1t) } /14,073-- 1911"? strongly community zoned Russell
14v-, traffic Z2022097
11--) i— and R1-18, Ranch
d Ler oppose tranquility
t-H,..-1,1-/ 4 CITY the accident much Phase IA
vralt-P z...
r' & use and larger 4, 5,
I I- ( STATE of hazards, & 52012007
tE the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
l-D name a
significant As As R1-6,
LI . 53 15-67_63ve ZIP "Russell property property high
V1 CODE

Jt ;
d _ >/i rrAf - - ---- ti' h ct lrs .1rs, ity he
ATURES .--9 . L V , South' on we we
,),/_LH-7,( A1K:-/ : j• ,. • _ as are subdivision, undersigned,
CjAA---e,3 dr' „„-- emergency also purchased
COLLECTED i
a SIGNATURE requested PETITION
• and concerned
BY: t_ ''' i If by property application STRONGLY
,/, t police
LI i -7.:,---7.---- PRINT the with in TO
--;S4e€,O.,4 applicant services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
maeg NAME area
0.--)..<,..e, S'(‘ for property & the
/ (2 . C ,:-..:1-s;dgcci.Q.510---.2-2,-- this for MARICOPA
me \'!',) Kogum 0/x,, !I'm rural values the S2012007., rezoning
_4_ , L.'" Saild ' I 4. area rural of
Li c:.-'0 A P .sz)02 and devaluating, setting The the
.isi"_ czo--a v-0,_ _;---,).-.7-tats' 9?-xl-eos -.).-- PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
- PI -44 # impact Luke larger North
ei ecre --/ Air zoning of
,27 r- -cl q3 4 LILI-- LOT of lots. of STOP
I 4 Force This the Came!back
/P-5.' /6 ) t SQ. , i overcrowding air THE
11'327 °- 3 ',',7 jgba?8 Li /9/116% /3.324-f space rezoning surrounding &
2 5--?-Yi- i!"-K,) u in East
7 9 6{1 GU our hazards, will of
/./....."? 0 iV, 0 0 i rr tj W. MAILING REZONING
DATE: I.J,a-gc:40.0„. / ie. 0 schools. neighborhoods Perryville
\(-_) F6 mOitu 0ke6, , iN, increased compromise
6/L9A , , 0,e6adb ADDRESS We known
Lliki) e50,1 also otir are OF
Ary.,,_ ) 4u/ AG/ P\i-e.... vehicle as
(41A, A 1 • fiv._ strongly community zoned Russell
traffic 1Z01Z097
i I ii, 4. and R148, Ranch
4-tit , bi oppose much
Ict_if,e,tc Z;:„--e::AiE) t/ichliiii 1 (4'lzt.iut Lilii1-41A iY-clii CITY the accident tranquility Pha;se &
, W;Fil _,,. f: & use larger
c)fs 1431 STATE of hazards, and 4,11, 5Z012007
Lc a i the parcols, & 6
4041 fr'-irtirt ?7,7-gs sie lifeqyles, to
/6-44, j 42_ 2 name As f. 1
- As
?-s-340 Y.S3V' ?63 053q b36) n-7 55-510 ZIP "Russell -,ollicant proiway propetty
,7to ,4e-). CODE 1111.11i

V , 1 h et !Ts Ns, ity he
ATURES A /41/#/a/' South" on we we
fri-'1-4-E-Ai 12-75,Z4 . 4111PLw are subdivision, u,ndersigned,
)V-0, a o AArwil as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED .4 —N SIGNATURE requested
)'ii and concerned PETITiON
BY: &5' Ta ?p property application STRONGLY
--10,5 .._—g—s-rEF•Etc3v / by police
iq 'AMA( 0 ii RaCetiAtA,Me_S IlDil.ce- PRINT the with in TO
services our this Z2012097 OPPOSE
(1 NAME applicant area
U /va,,4,,i c7"\- . --S for property for & the
Li, (-'—l-e ..(z..1),,_ C"f C-- this the rezoning MARICOPA
k_q IP rural values rural S2012007.
111 6,,,,,, area of
), I i setting The the
,/,7 rISe 54;1-'X) 5- -6)- and devaluating, present acres
' ).---i- 56b7„2.1.613 a PARCEL the and COUNTY
--7- sf\ -a:1-601 '.. 7-56i ft Impact Luke larger zoning North
.6s-t) 1,3;1. OLL3 I Air of
SP --ID "10 31 3 c. Z9 LOT of lots. of the STOP
-1 , Force This CameIliad
/7 } k- overcrowding air surrounding & THE
16555 \-P:\-----1 _iCs3L11, m.e., space rezoning East
37 7311
).,.) in will of
tAl a/ MAILING our hazards,
Lu-G1 `tO ofn,,,,_ neighborhoods Perryville REZONING
DATE: 6-A.,,c,_ deafra t ( , schools. increased compromise
e-eq_.5; ,,, ,, ADDRESS We are known
5 4,4 N'-'(_ also our as OF
Aue zei ,4,i • prv,,_ _ vehicle zoned
',AI& a t ... _,_..,. strongly community Russell
va I ' —_ . ; traffic 111-18, Z2012097
, Illtrich
L:1 Li 1 L oppose and much
eil-fi b __Z:;2,,, ii tranquility Phase St
ch 7,14:q_ A / ,ii-cl("cU CITY the accident larger
ed f 1ri---k.ct6fttyp eLct - i • & use and /1„
1:al :-, lid STATE of pa 5, 52012007
Fari: d. Ciluj \)v • -r- ? the hazards, lifestyles. rcilt & 6
= Ai I.\ it name ,is. to a
Az z, As As
significant
5s--- ZIP "Russell
es5-341O 1530 ---V-It, q.2qC' i':5.(1,6 CODE property property high
)fc 33/4

7" 7 h ct 3rs .rs, ity he
ATURES .A._., ,1-4-tikc ,)1I--1,V ( South on we we
.. ,„----'-‘ .„ as are subdivision, undersigned,
emergency also purchased
COLLECTED ' )
__._. • -k ' SIGNATURE requested PETMON
BY: • k 1 and concerned application
'r / by police property STRONGLY
I 7 —Atka 4 g_js.„-_EthDL(€3v: PRINT the with in TO
ft _A MP\D 5-rt(-7-LE applicant. services our this 4Z201.2097 OPPOSE
5-1c; NAME area MAR
„ for property for the
'Iqi 111- I this the &
1(26-vJe/ti -P0)15 --Sco-t4 ri. A ,..) A, rural values rural S2012007. rezoning ICOPA
/se.7., A ,
a.1) . area of
A q)- _562 g))- and devaluating, setting The the
56)---x7-13 sb,)_,a,-7:701 9.7).„..x.7...6---n .g)-g---)- , PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
):36 -7-?o/ ,-,_63s-- -).-/-t,c3 -1 # impact Luke larger North
1 " i 1 1 / b..< C of Air tots. zoning of STOP
ire.(3 "-1 1 39 --7 -73 13 I 1 LOT Force This of
3 the Camelback
1 i / 1. i (6,5_9 overcrowding air THE
wi—da f?52 llsjzY cis- /F.1---/(l tclzssz \c-653 ti- 0-7 space rezoning &
L Li „Zo S(-) co in surrounding East
Pi: ab ‘,-) 44. a {A.) our hazards, will of
L°L) Lu to iAJ . or,DTA MAILING REZOIAPNG
DATE: • /0 Ami schools. compromise Perryville
D6.7 L63.1:04 e,-, Gen-c-,,,_ :00 A increased neighborhoods
71&"7 arilri-C7,\ 11,Q.rif\lcriN, 62 j ve_ ADDRESS We our known OF
i...1 6.-------&-a6(4-R„L4 '170,..) also are
.76-1 L kii vehicle as
Apt .t., sr strongly community zoned
y__._ iLL traffic Russell Z7.012091
4.,,v J-1, . oppose and R148, I.aiid)
c -:+6 L----1-dr\---q' ) Te 2---LI-6 __I.7Z(.4:e< tranquility mud} &
/J-i-ctl1i7lci CITY the accident Phat
V' 1/1:4/ thrt Gith-c,e10,4-{Ac -kL 4( _ use and larger Il,.5,
2,4C da_ a e Pg &STATE of hazards, 8i szuazutli
the lifeslyles, parcels. 6
13.,,,, ctrA pki io.(k oirg/c #yL 4.-- name to
similic.int As As 111.
`LS-3 753" C s53.(-0 gswe, PC3 g673 ZIP "Russell prtiproy property ,6,
d:5‘,,6 75---3q• &to CODE hh
2.;-, 0

5:-- , f A 11 et 3rs ,rs, ity he
ATURES L:6-4 gib South' on we we
- d , are subdivision, undersigned,
as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED
g „....., r - ,..-:_,-,A.,,e,__A-4_,_. SIGNATURE requested and concerned PETOTEION
BY: ,. ,,, / property application STRONGLY
xrA...,../ 4 1 ( , / by police
gel 6.--7, itk„,,4,- 1/ PRINT the with in
lq hi•' appticant. services our this 1122012097 OPPOSE TO
twit il 777Ve NAME for property area
IALem2‘-14, ,, fA,,) for & the
Mi • / y this the MARECOIPA
ILA 4.40-el rural values rural S2012007. rezoning
46c ; r area setting of
Efil-r2, 51;1 . le and devaluating, The the
cb?-g)-- "..--"?' Cbolza--i-14(p (--, .51:_-p_-?46g. 57);"--7.4 PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
7- # impact Luke larger North
6,4 44 zoning
/ I 1 1 of Air lots. of STOP
2 1 12.k, 131 ?V-) , 4 /3_6 3: 2,4-) 15 LOT Force This of
- / /, g. i g , ,4 / i overcrowding air the Cainehack& THE
6 .2 6-3e9. .;,,,s" 12,324 A /!(' 7 /syry ,p 6517 space rezoning
GO '14 X4 (F-34/ei,_,_ ift7, surrounding East
ce 4,, j , al 41 t'i'r in will of
0 , az L-Jb6Ns-r(..,,s,J beki-in , f MAILING our hazards, REV:AMONG
DATE: - il-tai pe-k, _N./0.-k 9,tilfie/d/4 schools compromise ileighborhoods Perryville
increased
..,4 ., A-c,... ,Thiv k.3c.:,- R,Ve.. irdi ,a).p.--itmve,i4w ADDRESS We our know'
,c_ Att., i 1 -VE., also vellicle are ias OF
iii6
strongly community zoned Russell
traffic Z21,17.1)97
,4-,- A i 4 i __Lcri L-- oppose and lit-18, Rauch
i-ehr 7 LactiFiciA LLickljga ti—tfORE, tranquility much &
CITY the accident Phase
/A - P use and !ROW
1.94-Ak/ • l'7 f1N-a-, koriL fA-4. &STATE of hazards, 41, & 5ZU1Zou7
IC i, the lifestyles. parcels. G to
,1z._ dt Ag. name ;1
I sighllicant As As 11:1.-(i,
85 g5'3 ZIP "Russell
0.754,1z) -5 bssi-16 '4.0 ,,gs-4,gie 5.011,0 CODE proporly properly LORI
51b.

\ .. ,--- Ii a 3rs irs, ity he
ATURES (C ),Q'-'I South on we we
Or as emergency are subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED P.0-tH411,-00.3 also purchased
't-,A 4. - SIGNATURE requested PETMON
and concerned
BY: • 1 I / by police property application STRONGLY
PRINT the with in TO
, - Alt. l) Plickgcl - ..5-/- services our this OPPOSE
p 41-0445,-) ev NAME applicant. area #22012097
.i ittice !D' for properly the
, this for at MAIRPCOPA
1 A) S+4,04 :, 11 rural values the rezoning
., '• rural S2012007.
area of
and devaluating, setting The the
sw---,3-1- the and acres COUNTY
5al-D:2-7/3 Sb)--,-)--7240 Szo=x7.124, --14--all----1-rg PARCEL present
North
# impact Luke larger
--65- of
of Air lots. zoning STOP
IV lc& I 47 LOT Force of Cainelback
This
S IS-?- overcrowding air the & THE
j gevo ,"6.-37 LES:31r licK7,/ 4936- rezoning
`7 space surrounding East
tO IA, i 1 if,1 in will of
mibliI)-IrnIssothei - in ii, 1.1 — We our hazards, REZONE
e- i Z4-01113-folze„; MAILING Perryville
DATE; _ Ott iv1i.s.sauvr /_ schools. compromise
\I- f,_.6).Ztr'/ ic.‘e; .5c4,,I,1 increased neighborhoods OF
Aar. ADDRESS We known
A A-, ' Ay( ifro Our aS
6!-- t , also vehicle are
(\zoLe. Alia— — . / community RUZUll ZWIZU91
;/Le-- P' strongly traffic zoned
_
iki 1, , h 1 Lilck ' li oppose and RF:i8 iii11101 Ift
L 1( , vii- - , tranquility nich
d 1--1-r1eld I -fitiJ 'ite.-446( CITY the accident Phase
..././A1Cei A IP i li-;_,,,,,, e0 & use and tarp 4,
1.-0,itFieligliek/92. of r S, SZU1z111/7
&I+, STATE hazards, &
,re( 1Z-k. 7 6 the lifestyles, parcels. 6 in
1:1 A I , 4(z. name a
1( - d significant As As 111-6,
-'--3. g5-syt) g'''''W 53 ,gC14:si -- F`r3gi. ZIP "Russell prnperty
+0 CODE proneriy ih

ATUR , Ii ct .1rs .rs, ity he
/0-J , \ stiow:, Air South on we we
ES it- i'i.A•:yititieL A .,4Ale41, firl: , as are subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED , c Ul 1 „iterza ., emergency also purchased
11____,,,,, SIGNATURE requested pEirmom
BY: A Ca) 71 /ecx/. and concerned property application STRONGLY
/ by police
/44_,_ icieL. 1 0(1111(5 i , H PRINT the with in TO
efl,i "1:111- AL services our this 122012097 OPPOSE
./../14 :--- . °' ti-eR NAME applicant. area
0.-114-feLENG. :1-)60 6 e R5 for properly for gt the MAR1COPA
ktoeil„iivokyp (7) (..-_ o (i this the
et v CeCt - a rural values rural S2012007. rezoning
1,4u1, wic eed.4-6 - of
q I Sb s z , - area setting The the
9)).- 661,‘ )..-- „1 ) 56r)- and devaluating, COMITY
7)- ' _a:1 )--9:2- PARCEL the and present acres
.-714111 g)-)---a-7--No 1q le.-A , 9:2 larger North
- i .'63 "13)• -Tx? if impact Luke zoning of STOP
09 og 1 v 4 i\ctid` /q( 1 dio /go i'es'' , LOT of Air lots. of
-n d al A. Force This the Came!back THE
7 y / Ig/ 5'1 al j overcrowding air
9595 gr545 Las), zLt 0 space rezoiling surrounding t,Zt
ti'.36 2_ V.Cy2.,k), r? East
• GI-I, 60, W w 14 , , in will of IREZONJON6
C,I) i MAILING our liazards,
DATE: \i‘ft u-, iStpPA „x., schools. compromise neighborhoods Perryville
ttiS A5A4-1A- p46t4H(/ Mii-,2*)-14 Pirlatr4I_a MAN.Ate„ --G\ i).,..,-.; increased
ifka) t M ilk, ADDRESS We our known OF
also aro
iti, gve L-p-iw.pgi, 4_,P,A-2-e953eis ft-A-H , Az LA-,),CAgvie vehicle conin zoned as
-31/T, t5-3(1 strongly traffic unity Russell ZZU17.091
I 111-18,
X Li L1 L I I.' oppose and Ranch
tricg Lel) tic.-A L.--- ii4f; tAQ-e tranquility much &
4/4: -4 1-C16 the accident Mew
ql°Pil/t, d6L e. 1 'Tc..h:t.10 i e:Li kVA & use and 104:4s 4, !;,
/c4/ ci &ay f CITY_ STATE of hazards, 81, 520120i07
PL Lit-- 1 n A tc;„i Az_ the life!.fyioN, piircels, 6 to
6irk A,cix- itki- I( L&& a
' z__ significant Ac As R
naprte"Russell :f
gC3l-° efr3t/o M/6 sa3e-to c6F-55Lio •?6? 3 g5-3 w3,0 ZIP propel -6,
5341 Ito CODE t y joh

DLO h ct .,rs .rs, ity he
ATURES -- ,,,,,,, South' on we we
06Th L,...k.,.... ., Mal ...„----- 4/-7 J as are subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED emergency also purchased
e S ---"---‘ SIGNATURE requested PETMON
BY: .141fLej 4. 3. and concerned property application STRONGLY
/ by police
0 P A / Car° doi,v PRINT the with in TO
Lvp- o 0 applicant services our this ilZ2012097 OPPOSE
__,(F''.1-? 0 1 (17 NAME area
IA 'V LAE-1) -,e7 Hu for properly for & the MARRCOPA
, uSe,--10 -. kie47 this the
, 1/>ed2/r\f4;":IA o— rural values rural S2012007. rezoning
:..4. area of
,, and devaluating, setting The the
gd).--a-)-gsb r (C1'.9 SIV--1-2- 52)01.--T?--iii3 PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
cb)---,27-71.
6°' 1 -723 # impact Luke larger North
, of Air lots. zoning of STop
-,z-i9 VC() '7 1 ( -1 AA_ 129 1 g LOT Force of
I This the ComeIWO(
1 g i, /e( 1 '3 ' i overcrowding air THE
i,)-6---r C /r1i3 . . liSt-() alX(;) C-567740, ir-,9-ei g-s-so space rezoning surrounding gt
r ( i 5 50 6 tu, (...). in will East
a) ta I.A.) our hazards, of REzoNuNe
4v, 6j ,i,/, (,44.44/ MAILING
DATE; 11 0 Denton *.sr_.Si'61:X14°' /4E1442, schools. compromise neighborhoods Perryville
1:(,;61.-t moe-deFfix 6( i( ADDRESS We increased OF
\()(7-Q4SC2t It / 74cie also our are known
' Ave, • Aizz, vehicle as
46/-e- dif;.? -ME strongly cominunily zoned Russell 12.032097
traffic
It1-111,
t..;_ C. oppose and Ranch
LA-chf-i-el (-.4L C(4; trumoility much nz
MY the accident Phase
it ( 11 pJ use ai.l larger I, 5,
1 Gi i Ay 7-2-rZ &STATE of hazards, & 500:112UU1
Az the lifestylris. parcels. fi
trz, vk_ name to a
significant As As
q 17 I I 85340 v- ZIP "Russell propinly pmperty
CODE high

r, h ct 2rs 2rs, ity he
rkTURES South on we we
8,10 , as are subdivision, undersig
COLLECTED Z4didy vi/ lia IA '9 emergency also purchased ned,
t /64 at , i requested pErmoN
v r 7-7 RY-Pidd/kr.:;tEd.-0- TURE and concerned application
BY: L ,,,\fi)i de -,- , \i\k / by propert STRONGLY
5G s • PIIINT the police y
///fed,s / ' with in TO
, /1/7-A‘e skw,v, ffe -1-1- ,„ Ir\C— applicant. services our this /122011.2097 opPosr
to NAME area
if rA iv 11/1/S ..„,,,,; for properl for lie
e 6,,,b.--,.,L. - this y RiMIRCOPA
kt,e_, -. 4 Raiff( 04 rural values the S20:120[17. IVZ011iligi1
,. t'"" ,00 area rural
'.-S2)
ei( and devaluatin settin The lila
.5),;7)-•- '- ty_)---a-).... SZ)=1)-:;:fr L55.k."-27- g I11(1:0.2;; COUNTY
szl,„2-7_63 3-ta-a-i4tA sw__-?:?-6,3ti. ,,,,-„,,, ')--X?"-g66 PARCEL the g, and present
-.)-^677-7 4,77 -Aka 0 2— it impact Luke larger zonin 1\JO1111
. -1 I , Z---- of Air iols. g Of STOP
,2, zb 1.9._ aS / /If v, 13* LOT of
i rorce This Ole CaltiVIlt011(
/ I / Lk., /0(5- t st3— overcrowding air THE
61 c/a %. 165054,) t342,5 ci 31 space rezoning t;nrimindlnr,
5-- ir coi lAgzAd 0, 4-7/454s)vg__,..„ 2_ ,„ ‘eg...-C.‘C..\I in
-4.- 0 , our Ilia/A[0k, will Of
IFI PtItr1C, rw MAILING Lom itei REZONING
DATE: 62)6-&-4.--6(-(A &syryL 5 schools. Pf!rryvItlo
.frioit/c146 4,0s-44-tt sotAfit' itiCrO nronliso ghhodroods
5 S,..,..,—VK ADDRESS We IN!ti OF
,11--t/e 26-310 4 also our ;lire knowii
4-- , , , i/f--c&v- vehicle i
buz 7 c_. strongl communit wiled 1iieII Z2012097
C tratik:
L. y y I It'l-Ill,
4-(c4 ir oppme and rani Hooch
LdWriiiiiar-Za, P-cture Litgte, n much Ict
. Prt---- CITY the accident y dlit lin
ce-ge40 U use ger
&STATE of ha/aids, !,, szuazou
At,k-- -, Ldk pic..4-k. ,,,, I" r the parcol!., PI h
( \ In ,
name A,. .1
ZIP signillc.int pi
bV0 I5314° l/ "Ittis,sell 1)1141111y Jpni
CODE ly
,

ATURES 424 .7.' 4q Lo h ct on ars ars, ity he
•GritCL. Ci South' we we
r-I as emergency are subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED also purchased
-,4,60Tio,y/ t I f0C) -51061,0iu-eik_----- SIGNATURE requested and PETITION
BY: .-A-iii-Taii.ditiricirtsigurnwimp V concerned property application STRONGLY
1 I.\ / by police
131,---fr PRINT the with in TO
?cid- ef ev1/4;1c.k.Ak Lo services our this ftZ2012097 OPPOSE
Ltt'l- \ I / NAME applicant. area
co4teA O' ea__ i for property for & the
RI g this the MARPCOPA
051ey Ce,_ amr.1., 40 I4, 601Di-le..4k-- rural values rural 52012007. rezoning
, .,ii" area setting of
56 Sb)-- .c194--, and devaluating, The the
51);2-27-6 sSia-rn SUL-c27-1q1 .9)---W?"-ac 6-0(?--j7-*-7 502--21 z PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
or2- - e7-i2V It impact Luke larger North
-6U )..,7-e7S)3j, 6117 1-9-_-i-tftttec\ .62.8/ lots. zoning of
SQ \-10 9--aci /63 OP 6-7 7 -2 - 204, AP LOT of Air This of STOP
' 1 fir Force the Camelback
ig . _ _ S - 1651 overcrowding air THE
/C5-3 1t15-1 Sea/0 (scp_.5 S liK3?o /g3; 21- - rezoning &
I tV 31 W j r 2 - - teici2—*). space surrounding East
I 1.4 , 4...) ak -xiiiimitroo-- - rv Kl- in will of
/6 C.) , I MAILING our liazards, REZONNE
,b2.414.e.A Pfi q -otiu- tift'S5°(//' Ceoredisk. . 6 gie Vaire,c40 schools. compromise neighborhoods Perryville
De" e_Ors, 111010,121c) increased
14,v( Ave., ADDRESS We our known OF
4v,..:;(1.1.,4.1 ra nur.iiii D,4-•:\,_ ,PIN40 also are as
il-it,,, -- vehicle community zoned
Fl-kce - --- strongly Russell ZZU1ZU91
sk%) -- traffic
2-1)1 • L oppose and tranquility R148-, Ranch
---1 4-kJ^ ) much
tjArriel LiiTAICE1214, 0 - the accident Phase t
r -ke 1 CITY use and 11,
0\a.A, I.L.--cLtk<A,ye.iipliAi-k (-3Y.kkji&Lgilk Id mil t-l-46C-fiztA71----Z4211— larger 5,
&STATE of hazards, 52U1ZUU7
:War ka- Pciftk Paek)J-1-2 i the 111w:ivies. parcels. & 6
illik„ k f name signil to a
Pk!
i? 6 .. $53 ,53 en e-53 g , ZIP "Russell [cant As
C/90 53 4a3.10 410 2to ES-3f q 5340 CODE prom propvrty
4 iy

r h ct 2rs ?.rs, ity he
8ITURES ,.----,.. ,..-.0" it .iefl-4—" er Soutlr on we we
"Ilir ferf; as are subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED Air rW - emergency also purchased
A 1 : Or A I I AllOA SIGNATURE requested PETITION
I3Y: ' 6 Nril and concerned application
- 111111 Akibif ./11 , . / by police propert STRONGLY
6 4 42..i2 vrefr Ago PINT the with y in TO
nAca, A3 Abi q5?._ ill applicant. services our this /17.201.2.097 OPPOSE
("6 et.e. if: '411: NAME for properl area
kl§-1. e 401731, this for 81. Um MARIICOPA
y the
5 Soli Ltfc $4 rural values rural S201.2007. rezoning
i
area of
50 and devaluatin setting The the
Z---2-1 .1,56.;,-a-7--io .51)--A-) ‘0-,9 PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
^ tzri - -7-i00,-3 ,66-L7-6e55, it Impact g, Luke larger zonin North
. NC of Air g (tr STOP
2:26 0101 (eR LOT ot
1 rorce This he Caint!ikick
' 1 i'6 , m-is- cc/ overcrowding air THE-
,C-3 e),(1144/ 0c) HS (637y6 space reaming surrounding IN(
g5SqLk) ( w in will East
A 1 tv MAILING our of REZONING
. 1 11/14 ,
DATE: u (AiX(9.1:14(el L.4.40.,,14)e_ schools. compromise twill:111004100A lifIryvillo
^ 1,‘: hie Mal-kik tiaimz.,„.„2,6g,,,L&c_p=reAt4b (A)G,eavi ADDRESS increased
t..A.,./.--t We OF
A i also mu' koliwn
LJC v (271:: ia vehicle ;11-#
e Aft Vc strongl corium zoned Z2012097
traffic itt, Russell
,/ I:A Z,.: y and I 8, Rancil &
i‘jicti t Lp EicIA /76-i oppose
Id traluptiliw ino4;11 PI
LiAthTed-Pq CITY the accident ke.0
IP-J(4' plc P a use lafger SZIKIZULDI
//0/7 11 4_,164, le444( STATE of ha/Ads,
e. the
E K ite-e, z name io a
8
i55-1 353/1 cfa CiS 3 SerS'10 Fr'573 ZIP "Russell Want 1111)1Wtiy o,
40 L • CODE til hig h
. y

SIG the hazards, parcels. density We
--47!TAl k , ,-----V. .-As -. name lifestyles. the
4vik °4-,-. Ct2t,e,(2) m.. As
1 1A Piiiii 111,- .„. I f "Russell significant As property subdivision, undersigned,
a-40-/ e9IY)1 property
COLLECTED ' SIGNATURE Ranch impact PETITION
).-- C(A Al owners owners, application STRONGLY
BY: V4 //4a4 Li I South" on we
ifp6te-- C:)..&,\e_cI Ci PRINT as we
1,c1 fV . emergency are purchased #Z2012097 OPPOSE TO
II Oil ,,,ne.,,..-.,9 761A/ NAME requested also
( St-,1--0,-4-'''t LiO and & the
_, • C - by concerned property MARICOPA
--1437r 1 ./A., 14/2 6, the police S2012007, rezoning
' e__ t.:74.fe with in of
, S\ls&.I\ d applicant. services this the
gm..,1 our area Case
--J--) 373z--3-1 R)\-?;1-516-1 6-b.)-o__—?— '.\\-ke)C\ 277 27 5);)---g1-"3-6 PARCEL for this property for acres COUNTY
— - -713 -.35S'.- # rural the IfCPA2012012, North
q) g4 —pi values rural of
— .S6177 8 269 \ 1 .23 --Z- 233 LOT area setting STOP
1 e, ( and The Camelback
435/6 1 /16/ V.-.'F 16515 igg-t7 /57- the devaluating, and present & THE
-41'0W ?--,,--m r85.3 IOW 7 5Z7 impact larger East
lij 4-/- Z,, id° Luke zoning of
4z,/ 1/1 Z-,../kz.. 511Ai 4h MAlLING of Air lots. of
i5,644-0 . \L\-\\\ ...C4,A) Force This the Perryville REZONING
,v iPife,c4116:a0 icL-f-PL. IAL0REertiv 40 ,Pc' \--Cl. overcrowding air rezoning
MIGY14-6 fel , ADDRESS surrounding known
..43-ec & in space OF
41,p,,,, C u Se- our will as
DATE: AVO v-e__, jzi \fil hazards, Russell
kve 6 eg-Yg, /9.ve, schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
ik i 1 ( We increased Ranch
14. le p. k .4.0rel/A76.e.-./3, iLirc-/1,76.4-0 also our are Phase &
CITY
li & strongly vehicle community zoned 4, 5,
/674-:" Pie; STATE traffic R1-18, & 6 S2012007
if re- t( 1\ H f I "9zi 4-Z oppose to a
and tranquility much
11 A 1 e I i. A , 9 8'53 ZIP the use accident larger R1-6,
f4 (7 ‘ 5g CODE and high
,tz,) 44 of

h ct ,Irs rs ity he
ATURES C.-- ..._ South on we we
r as emergency are subdivision, undersigned,
_ 4--------- also purchased
COLLECIEDBY: LG:21E requested and PETITION
concerned property application STRONGLY
/ by police
PRINT the with in TO
ak applicant. services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
NAME area
for property for & the
this the rezoning MARICOPA
rural values rural 52012007.
area of
and devaluating, setting The the
PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
# impact Luke larger North
3 of Air lots. zoning of
9 LOT Force This of Camelback STOP
the
overcrowding air THE
tig3if space rezoning surrounding &
in East
our hazards, will of
r., NIAILING Perryville REZONING
DATE: schools. compromise neighborhoods
increased
igok-LLE---DE ADDRESS We our known
S137-1 also vehicle are as OF
strongly community zoned Russell
traffic Z2012097
oppose and R1-18, Ranch
bit tranquility much 81.
upi CITY the accident Phase
E43-, & use and larger 4,
Pple-i4 STATE of the hazards, S, & 5Z012001
lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
name As As a
-11 ZIP significant R1-6,
LiQ CODE 'Russell property property high

name As As We
,. significant subdivision, the
SIGNATURES 6.1h1.4.1 ,• property property
S "Russell
i laii impact owners owners, undersigned,
A II , Ranch on application
COLLECTED L. A.Ati.,1 .., i SIGNATURE we we PETITION
, South" emergency are STRONGLY
BY: . / as also purchased #Z2012097
I a. i ,,RRINT and TO
-5-6170 requested concerned property & OPPOSE
fU.T.A4iP Fe NAME police
ttd-v by with in 52012007, the
Rodr3ca the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
e7,-,, applicant. area Case
.w for property for of
this the the
(."--b)--27- CL,A rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres
___11.-+fr" PARCEL COUNTY
-7 area North
09 -6S-3 # and devaluating, setting The of
iLfs--- 1 5 13,4 —i'' . LOT the and present STOP
11 i impact Luke larger Came!back
) I 1 zoning
155-1 03 ig`301-4 i? moso / of Air lots. & THE
ta . 36% 9-57C Force This of East
\ , .. ) Li tm. (A), L,) overcrowding air the of
, C-- MAILING rezoning
Oerttivl space surrounding Perryville REZONING
1>3A7,vi /d.; /Li' in
f'r ()tit ADDRESS our hazards, will
,A kw . li2.____ 6eorci'aptkre, known
A L/-156741):14 schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
DATE: increased
We Russell
3 also our are Z2012097
I. 1 14+1/11 Ltl- ; L vehicle zoned Ranch
4-1.45,(2 -te L)41cLiveip 47.(Az4‘i) CITY strongly traffic community Phase &
rk ,17-ei Cidt(;e10) 1-61c'efok / i - & R1-18,
A, PIL . 2 - oppose and 4, 5,
i,akte Park STATE tranquility much & 52012007
2.tc Pc P6rk 134x/c the accident 6 to
y_ te " use and larger a
440S b-1 ZIP of the hazards, high
853q g55c16 lifestyles. parcels.
7 0-13a, 9'61 CODE density
9' 6

name As As We
SIGNATURES (../ significant property property subdivision, the
' "Russell
eL.--.--- impact owners owners, undersigned,
Ranch on application
COLLECTED'Etk c 4 SIGNATURE we we PETITION
i r„,.. South" emergency are STRONGLY
, 1.9 / / as also purchased #Z2012097
4//61Z.A__.! PRINT and TO
," requested concerned & OPPOSE
NAME police property
I AZ/ by with in 52012007, the
the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
l I/ applicant. for property area Case of
c- -1:-; this for the the
L- biA- . rural values #CPA2012012. acres
30 31) -AD PARCEL rural COUNTY
-30-313 - ' ,.A area North
c 1 331 # and devaluating, setting The of
Jo los3 AYIF ib-7 LOT the and present STOP
/ 6 7 impact Luke larger Camelback
/82 " Z of Air lots. zoning & THE
,,K-7 67 1,5715,e
6 7-9 Force This of East
overcrowding air the of
t/L) MAILING rezoning
space surrounding Perryville REZONING
c in
ADDRESS our hazards, will
14,4/4"1,goil)A- known
, fre/,./ . schools. compromise as OF
DATE: , increased neighborhoods
SiVe We Russell
3 A also our are Z2012097
c vehicle Ranch
ex,_ strongly community zoned &
CITY traffic Phase
esir A & oppose and R1-18, 4,
. STATE tranquility much 5, & S2012007
iI the accident 6
4z- use and larger to a
of hazards, high
ZIP the
P539E.-) lifestyles. parcels. density
?S- CODE

name As As We
./.41.0 (-11Y significant subdivision, the
SIGNATURES property property
4,,..7 :7:7----,-2 Jo' ,es.',,,,,,6 n "Russell
- impact owners owners, undersigned,
EU, cei.0.7244/ 5----- Ranch on application
COLLECTED i SIGNATURE we we PETITION
p,"44,, South" emergency are STRONGLY
c--, IL _3' I .-41 MO / as also purchased #Z2012097
-hie 2----------- I, PRINT and TO
6ercilcia IL' requested concerned property & OPPOSE
6ehec,‘_ <11(1' P 4,0,tirci NAME police
:414 i 1,f ie by with in S2012007, the
1 je:e. I., b fr(ACCT" the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
19(CtA4 1 1 Pdtt54 area Case
Silore 13eiroll/Uez-.5bd.--xl, .., Sictillers applicant. for property for of
.q,4, 434..- this the the
%Q-..Z— i4)..:)..,1) -•-7 - rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres COUNTY
) , __ - al -,71, 017.- PARCEL area North
&,;"4v 07 6 eA 3 -64-1 64L1 # and devaluating, setting The of
110 1 i i 1 q ( tc;), (i5 LtitiD, / lia LOT the and present STOP
)4 r; ( _ impact Luke larger Camelback
?), 1 'I F Of _1(? 12 1-83ca /KAY of Air lots. zoning & THE
460 r 3 CS 4/ 'VS 2ZiO Force This of East
57 ' 0 1 IN W. overcrowding air the of
\J - • tA) 1. 10 (Ai.-GezArj;ct- MAILING rezoning
-04,, b &Mt& space surrounding Perryville REZONING
-De/R in
--fr, A en-ko Getyi:.-3kAve IA, ADDRESS our hazards, will known
-an-bo Aar,. 0 Ate ?gut schools. compromise as OF
DATE: N12, increased neighborhoods
, We Russell
Mc_ also our are Z2012097
if k 44c vehicle Ranch
UP i,-.7-1-0--.6, I If d'it44/4-)41 strongly traffic community zoned Phase &
trriCAP,V?gtki CITY
/cilia/A/ 1A-trifM & oppose and R1-18, 4, 5,
/1-1- 0 16co-k- STATE tranquility much & S2012007
Pe, the accident 6
/IG 4z Az Pa' use and larger to a
of hazards, high
PS-3 e5:3 S5 5534 ZIP the lifestyles. parcels.
St1.1'- C5'3u10 Svs' 253.6. 340 6) CODE density

name As As We
significant subdivision, the
SIGNATURES D property property
), "Russell
4p(r------ 7 impact undersigned,
',./ i SIG Ranch owners owners, application
COLLECT-EDI A on we we PETITION
\'\A- TURE South" emergency are STRONGLY
BY: rek8 / as also purchased #Z2012097
Q • PRINT and TO
requested concerned & OPPOSE
1 p6- (710. Sa NAME police property
t kidy Ca-01 6 , by with in 52012007, the
di„, t-I 0.-,G4,e,,,,,kkt,hic4--12-r1/4-ct-2 the services our this MARICOPA
rezoning
- iinisirePt--- -1-\7AufeA i applicant. area Case
rdSiT40, , for property for of
„ this the
5h the
—• 51,:,4--,27 -5-t')---J-q.- -- g4,..._,),-) rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres COUNTY
PARCEL
- al-3g .-- - area North
(,,57 OA .... ) ic3 P-C3 c- Li- # and devaluating, setting The of
ei 33 33 14 LOT the and present STOP
-- impact Luke larger Camelback
) V ( zoning
fg C.Se -ACh\\ V\ V 11131 fs.-3 . 4ir of Air lots. & THE
- \Ir\-?fS 0 / Z( (3 „. ,.,,, A' , Force This of East
Li , c)CbL, 2 0._ lic...) kid - overcrowding the of
e 153 air
c,-61,, CUI MAILING space rezoning Perryville REZONING
Lk) Ramcit re 4. A. in surrounding
b r .%Q_,kk,“ ,_ - . ADDRESS our hazards, will
Lig°`)\-°`''' , , known
vi&zoes*Pyttre_ De kIn6Ki-Si- . 'Cr schools. OF
-\0- S4A.iti,. compromise neighborhoods as
. increased
Roaca We Russell
S) also our are Z2012097
41 t , vehicle Ranch
, fat . WACO strongly community zoned &
V 1 ; i ut-c-1Qe1c; CITY traffic Phase
11 ; 1 c Lckit&((-1219,34A? ea, & oppose and R1-18, 4,
i 2 _1 STATE tranquility 5, & S2012007
; ii k2.-- the accident much 6
7) /4./10-7- use to a
Az and larger
ce- P/1-4,1-0-2fr55'fc c ZIP of the hazards, high
W-Li C fi'5-7. g5-3 WS3S5_ c lifestyles. parcels. density
li K 3/O go 33 CODE
,

9" name As As We
4,„,,, ketni ,eci --:f ,.,. significant subdivision, the
SIGNATURES f LoL 7 n property property
. i atl--(2) "Russell
• Lla ' impact undersigned,
. owners owners,
f - I / 1 .7.2. Ranch on application
COLLEe4ED '' • ) 1/ i-4-0064-:- ,_ 11R4/01 -- SIGNATURE we we PETITION
/1/,'/ ViArrl South" emergency are STRONGLY
YA ---- 16,-I: 6 / as also purchased #Z2012097
BYnitzei , j "i..5. ' / Carol PRINT and TO
\OjU Cf 1 ,, °' , ‘ eceerer requested concerned & OPPOSE
, ,;._ NAME police property
, ( De4 .t - . _ 1 s .,-,Ayr_. N by S2012007, the
, 1 W7) the with in
4:- d j 1-1,Xt4e3r3 services our this rezoning MARICOPA
9 \ , 01 f 07-- 657-2,,J/,u,k4. area Case
,mo , . ' A._.s-, applicant. for property of
this for the
5 54 .5- 5-6a the
544--a--) rural values #CPA2012012. acres
64-A-7- cbA_-,x7,153 - --A--2-R .;.--(:)--„):-).-131 5-09.--X2-wi PARCEL rural COUNTY
A-) " -a-1,13 -7 area North
gcri -it/4_ )0 .1 --2g # and devaluating, setting The of
I
1 .7 D - • kg i(R (2,ci 4- I LOT the and present STOP
cl \ i'a. I y impact Luke larger Camelback
I. I 3 i
rp 9 --(--Li\s?- 1.650(o W 8(9 of Air lots. zoning & THE
ri 57'..,1 (,[45.- N Force of East
W a k-\), vi I-SIL-) C3'5 This the of
r) Iv \ % overcrowding air
cl q3ua‘Li,D_,,,,,\0,D1d.a..t.,„o i MAILING space rezoning Perryville REZONING
hiVON -utiN.-1-2— (--Uk(--- in surrounding
)) e r our will
D y 1 ADDRESS hazards, known
( .---.0- Av Li-14-1-A-Q--- fL,C.. schools. OF
1 t compromise neighborhoods as
DATE: increased
AA-E., I, Aokr We Russell
also our Z2012097
I, vehicle are Ranch
(AL 2,gl.:114---( strongly community zoned
.1 lithReid CITY traffic Phase &
: V i.") 4kgie0 12) & R1-18, 4,
'1/4e16 4 oppose and 5,
STATE tranquility & S2012007
RooT, Pfre_le the accident much 6
7i! 01z44 AA ydi:Tki use to a
and larger
i of high
-. .--.Es.-2 ZIP the hazards,
v• gCR,6 eyY1-1-0 1:37:-VL 2354 lifestyles. parcels. density
G CODE

name As As We
t ---7 significant subdivision, the
SIGNATURES property property
LIP' "Russell
C -ed_e_,i rmt. 1711_10 /•.., impact owners owners, undersigned,
,_ • , . ' -3 /.244 - - v Ranch on we application
COLLECTED /K - qc- SIGNATURE we PETITION
4.5.expl r, . - - - South" emergency are STRONGLY
B ,ViileiL - - L4(4, ioe-e-— / as also purchased #Z2012097
1:.)-t-eD- PRINT and TO
M-0.7)12) 5 / , .773-i, A requested concerned property & OPPOSE
NAME police
2 , by with in S2012007, the
i i ,./ 0 6,,-1 the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
./71; , area Case
i- applicant. for property for of
50).- this the the
5-6)--a-z- 56,1--al - rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres COUNTY
a-) PARCEL area
9.1"--115. ‘,61 -.- 1 -0577 # and devaluating, setting The North
! of
/C; 41> -1+ bt55 315 LOT the and present STOP
impact Luke larger Camelback
a:3'17 i /23-7.5 / 1- /833 of Air lots. zoning & THE
iirs-3 - 2014 553ZZ a" 7 Force This of East
/(9 599 i IS ‘k, GA) Al- overcrowding air the of
0 0,,, 4---f6z-c-) - N. t,L) MAILING rezoning
P,-/?4,-,74, space surrounding Perryville REZONING
(tje,lc 1_.0 1s(70/(/' i Mar-sAidW ADDRESS in our hazards, will
7)/(r'ss,,,,,-; . N__k_- I/ known
94kt. gi4MOAA(.4kic schools. OF
4 N VI jek It /9-7/1 :4''L increased compromise neighborhoods as
DATE: 4,ke i."-d- g-r,:e We Russell
,47„,, g also our Z2012097
3 X ,,z LA i (--vec i vehicle are Ranch
-26_ t i Z...,4-4-4 lat " S.._ilift-PKW (.,1.(,-,i,s, tOarlel strongly community zoned &
146- F _ L.- CITY traffic Phase
1:1 tab .-Ti- /24 & oppose and R1-18, 4,
,0:,,,of Az, te,t-eld PA L'D rirr STATE tranquility 5, & S2012007
,et ILK Ai/( A Pitri the accident much 6
,6,,6e • A. ? A7_ ciWZ . el use and larger to a
1/ of high
- ZIP the hazards,
fr5.& eEbt4 • lifestyles. parcels. density
- -. 44c:i 0 e-, e 7--/7 CODE
1

Sid , name As As We
f ,,. significant property property subdivision, the
NATUJWCOLI 0, • ',0,_,,L= "Russell
impact owners owners, undersigned,
Ranch on application
- SIGNATURE we we PETITION
ED do, South" emergency are STRONGLY
/ as also purchased #Z2012097
mg..g_ & ' fe PRINT and TO
''. (5.4, requested concerned property & OPPOSE
A'-`-''c- NAME police
c by with in 52012007, the
the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
7550.1u Wiefl€-- A applicant. area Case
•=v:'-)-c) l for property for of
5) this the the
rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres COUNTY
569-01-7-19 ,_.•cai_6,s.-(., 4)---61:1-"q PARCEL area North
-,27c),S- 51),-1.-46s7ci # and devaluating, setting The of
,t,t3 1, 1R-1 7 51 LOT the and present STOP
impact Luke larger Camelback
/( lutz- '5523 5511 1-8 / Ig/6_1;v5 / of Air lots. zoning & THE
3536.. /g6---- 49 ..(;-.2 Force This of East
6J- \ /14 ki , Ail iZ_LO . - A I, overcrowding air the of
, ,i, /(Y. ) ZI, l'i- MAILING space rezoning Perryville REZONING
i0E,roL HISLiti- rufF- I ,C;L , - 676z) in surrounding
Pux-lehil, '7'-'- L..0, 4-71.. 'biesi 0 jtcia ADDRESS our hazards, will known
Yltz, 6-•-z.- Lao /9Pe fA-- 47417 c; ' AL, schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
DATE: A-K. t. AvE_. We increased Russell
ke also our are Z2012097
Zyc_A- LA ( ; 1-Ji-c, vehicle Ranch
1,,,.(--z-f141, -E 2,v;77.- ,74/160 4 -. CITY strongly traffic community zoned Phase &
1„;--id-C,c.17/71-1( f-;•rid .kl 4 3/4.,"„4,. 4; q & oppose and R1-18, 4,5,
--Pa...v a 0 A-, .ci STATE the accident tranquility much & 6 S2012007
)64- Wi,,),T<L - v P4eL. -Pak use to a
.L ic of and larger high
%-3 ct-s-z2it) es-3 69.3 ZIP the hazards, lifestyles. parcels.
i7.-5.is'7( 0 gi.;340 vo F.E.v/ei 16 rc-376i g_St('. CODE density

_ name As As We
SIGkATURES significant property property subdivision, the
"Russell
00, impact owners owners, undersigned,
k elii7 f Ranch on application
COLLECTED \v\k,6A SIGNATURE we we PETITION
( ---ex7 '' South" emergency are STRONGLY
/ as also purchased #Z2012097
,eFF 6 PRINT and TO
requested concerned & OPPOSE
s , (.1 ( Rit NAME police property
_'06:7_,,4_ if by with in S2012007, the
02,1:_e5M/ i - cck--(3, dujcio,c,. the services our this MARICOPA
4. A Case rezoning
, applicant. for property area
for of
uoc.Lczi this the the
44- 51)--- i Pillake-9-- keilkWii,:o 5Y0L-a-1- --e rural values #CPA2012012. acres
t;°--.;1- 0 el PARCEL rural COUNTY
area North
Cg15 -1---7c5 74'7 IA Ltd,_ # and devaluating, setting The
?t t (f5 q LOT the and present of STOP
E0b IC-- - _ 3 impact Luke larger Carnelhack
/6=3/6- g cp )n- 146° (17 '' K -0 ;g3 of Air lots. zoning & THE
ewe, ..•- S- -,-7 / 2 I iiF/2--/-tki 0 Force This of East
€.0, k/, k overcrowding air the of
7 '') t4). a MAILING rezoning
w __ 5-1,t, ) C5, space surrounding Perryville REZONING
, /41(4a4v, Deil--i trejon in our will
0„) e(,\f-. Monkbe..16 ADDRESS hazards,
orq__,. known
(,;(.iE, A ,G 0 ?,"- schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
DATE: ( 1,61/-e e It e4 increased
oraki 4-6k, ix At/ 4 :, Ave, We Russell
3 t e also vehicle our are Z2012097
(-;- L:fr: L'v / Ranch
(4cit r_u_e_iL,Lchf-icaivic strongly community zoned &
-/ )( tc#F-re /474V5I:4f, Lv\-QAtOs. CITY traffic Phase
/ ./P/r,L •C).' oppose and R1-18, 4,
--z__ P 4c7fid sa &STATE tranquility 5, S2012007
_0 2.eloirk )2ifik the accident much & 6
v ,codc ece use to
it eklAr yk of and larger a
nil R-s-3 ZIP the hazards, high
i I 79'3`16 i'f3Vd ki-34 CODE lifestyles. parcels. density
0 (Rf-:=
,

name As As We
SItNArURES 2 , 1 -I significant property property subdivision, the
; , ' fiCk ,. --'---- "Russell
ar_ (.-7'-"----Z impact owners owners, undersigned,
40 POO t ' ..- '--'e../ Ranch on application
COLLEtTE SIGNATURE we we PETITION
i / _ c. 1 67.4.4._ South" emergency are STRONGLY
7 , / / as also purchased #Z2012097
PRINT and TO
----57-<..—<c-----_ C./4/S requested concerned & OPPOSE
Zlie--,9 d/vvii NAME police property
/„(y6K,0,,,,-, by with in S2012007, the
, 0 the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
rao z:,a-jte..74,i applicant for area Case
4 , property for of
57;1- this the the
cba-.Q--7 i rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres
, 5-b9,--7)--2o! ai- gD)--1-7-Qc* PARCEL COUNTY
- area North
' I I,kc' (illq # and devaluating, setting The of
l [Z7 30i /i, S7 Ab3 .74,47/-, i54 I LOT the and present STOP
( I impact Luke larger Camelhack
( 15 1g3 9 [ s--4 I _lq.36 16_,, of Air lots. zoning & THE
3 .-... 3 /P/:,.) / pff-,4 Force This of East
2..,.., qf (.,.., 3 overcrowding air the of
W6corg1c /Li g) MAILING rezoning REZONING
t), 1,, space surrounding Perryville
6-:)1(_,R,P,442,/.1-,_ 1 L in will
bfr e ) 14/4'-f/- ,,,,,,, A v-kv,e,2 ADDRESS our hazards, known
—7 t/z..6-.t.
L.,h.. \- lt schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
DATE: ,._,. ii,h,t-,,- 4,‘ We increased Russell
E also our are Z2012097
3, 4 1_,,i vehicle Ranch
' 1 i)-1-64€tio, -r2.7_7 ii,/,--0/Fx-tjp strongly traffic community zoned Phase &
o, ion- CITY
\ & oppose and R1-18, 4,5,
' .,,,-,--\,c, 6-- r a fi . STATE tranquility much & S2012007
atAk .4,4(,4.e. the accident 6 to
t - use and larger a
of high
t 1 -1aLk-C3La ZIP the hazards,
t 7;S:--3--1c 85:9t) lifestyles. parcels. density
540 CODE

, name As As We
SIGNAtillitS significant property property subdivision, the
"..----- "Russell
"1,1-tr, )6-v1 _ impact undersigned,
gt,J,7)_1 11 ' Ranch owners owners, application
COLLECTED NL- It ' SIGNATURE on we we PETITION
1 4 / South" are
i_csti, / Y,CC('D I C / as emergency also purchased #Z2012097 STRONGLY
Ir \ / 12.. •r-i*)-11 PRINT TO
„e \i' s 9(eu-e requested and concerned & OPPOSE
L GL, k--,fIri c€ ,-( QN1-1.-\ NAME police property
\--- -- by with in 52012007, the
Oct,L6--- i) M Se, the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
n to( applicant. area Case
,7-‘, for property for of
g_ this the the
5-b,3--277- st-g--a-2- 5*---As3 rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres
e-7-u 56.4.-7---att, .5b-d--A-2---7ko PARCEL area COUNTY
qD2.)_--.R--7.--Rs'Ig--=) _.--?,?)q, 6M- (,;3 --;), # and devaluating, setting The North
0, of
17-6 lo c 311 12- - 77 zo 1 ‘- 1 LOT the and present STOP
impact Luke larger Camelback
11-2- 5-Y.M 5L-Lso \ )3S33 /E-!, 3 15339 1 s'c.if' 10?).)b of Air lots. zoning & THE
:'(-Y-7 P-) N-) SV'D /T- Force This of East
w- Lk.). 4,-) co 5 0 overcrowding air the of
a6 Kik 5n (-35k.-A, , MAILING rezoning REZONING
G-r-c--r- u LiLi Dentbn space surrounding Perryville
/Ylay-5hot/) Pr Die- , y( 141 7x.,:---)._;?6,..) ,cvie&tiI L in our will
Lc., i . -44 c.). ADDRESS hazards, known
)-q-Y si,,, 0 schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
/4-ue.__ -4-411.)c. .A,L,c. Av6 .0- increased
L 0.)L We Russell
also our are Z2012097
,.... I,- L- L LI vehicle Ranch
—IC MEW i Ie strongly community zoned &
icip'W LA-C1--eittO LricliP.,‘.11 t&2 44,,F CITY traffic Phase
J„ q.-k--1/-).1ci 1144A-P-e(pid-k_ a ,F" (re ,.. & oppose and R1-18, 4,
p4-At raat 1- r &-,--1-A2 k m ,-,14-3,1ong1061t STATE tranquility much 5, & S2012007
Afic Voir-Lc Aek 'k the accident 6 to
fi L. ,e,,a,t._ use and larger a
ZIP of hazards, high
EC3'ic Fs}frc 7S3 853.1b .63,c,,,_ gS3410 the lifestyles. parcels. density
(f0 CODE

name As As We
SIGNATURES rbi - / -1?-Pzsr.-, qr' 7)-iir significant property property subdivision, the
IL ilakcektkz- "Russell
TV A impact owners owners, undersigned,
4 Ranch on application
COLLECTED / 'kr•-•\.--..I. SIGNATURE we we PETITION
South" emergency are STRONGLY
\\ A Jan,,,,, / as also purchased #Z2012097
I)M i 7 ' ije5 PRINT re and TO
is l'e '-.---x 1-0 quested concerned propert & OPPOSE
Sijke tc. NAME police
(i' i—d-c ---P--- 4- by with y in 52012007, the
Pal,\P204 Ki-j/cm_ oltetsurt the servicesfor our this rezoning MARICOPA
Ot <-\\.,.._,,i-,,,A applicant. area Case
6 this propert for of
fkl51Z-1/ ele)-72,4-(44,,S19-=g7-7cq sok_L64"9.3.,x)....617s rural y the #CPA2012012. the
n cb)---X? \-" ,.--- PARCEL values rural acres COUNTY
sk).--D--)-66)14 area North
—k9.ef -45) # and devaluatin settin The of
(3'64 M7 I ,s. LOT the g and present STOP
-Alog, SD 1) ‘ ., impact g, Camelback
rA s-S-- t le of Luke larger zonin THE
( (smci /S---zg YKS11 ic(4J2.-- 50 Air lots. g of &
C .,() 4 ifire4-1'' overcrowdin Force This the East
\,s72-.)(0 ui U , tvi frli of
. b MAILING air rezonin Perr REZONING
ir 1/1451,-- iltilicrskie 017 1> g in space g surrounding yville
LO Illianjel2an I.,),q1/4\0,;„\_s;i,-,1\ en+D ADDRESS our will
(10161/Q*64112) ill it gi-z*-,,,g-kee----- hazards, known
A A -11/4"-- schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
ii AAsoi,--- d- ve.._ increased
DATE: 4, _, We Russell
3_ -H-LI-- mepet)0 - also our are Z2012097
vehicle Ranch
stron communit zoned
4e et L,,i,j4eld i4ckri4 tkaliAii/ L1'4D.J114eL6- CITY gly traffic Phase &
N, CA v:tc__,\N5,1--\4_\-,19-\(\ c727'difil- & y R1-18, 4,
4 CIL STATE oppose and tranquility much 5, & S2012007
i( '1 rac lede-- Pa ) the accident 6 to
(IC-- use and lar a
lc of ger high
Z ZIP the hazards,
t S53g6 t1/4, FA 8S3w 83,425. CODE lifestyles. parcels. density
c)

name As As We
SIGNATURES significant property property subdivision, the
"Russell
.. impact owners owners, undersigned,
Ranch on application
COLLECTED SIGNATURE we we PETITION
South" emergency are STRONGLY
h / as also purchased #Z2012097
PRINT requested and concerned & OPPOSE TO
NAME police property
by with in 52012007, the
the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
applicant. for property area Case of
this for the
the
rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres COUNTY
PARCEL area North
# and devaluating, setting The of
LOT the and present STOP
impact Luke larger Came!back
I $3 of Air lots. zoning & THE
ii Force This of East
LA) overcrowding air the of
= 11/10 MAILING space rezoning surrounding Perryville REZONING
nf4 ADDRESS in our hazards, will
17e, known
1 to schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
DATE: ibie We increased Russell
also our are Z2012097
vehicle Ranch
, 1._,•=6, strongly community zoned &
(A.ci CITY traffic Phase
e. & oppose and R1-18, 4,
ioe STATE tranquility much 5, &6 52012007
the accident
_,---k_ use and larger to a
of hazards, high
g,57.3 ZIP the lifestyles. parcels.
CODE density
'0

name As As We
SIGNATURES i significant property property subdivision, the
I( illt or al "Russell
, MIZI/ impact owners owners, undersigned,
Ranch on application
COLLECTED 4/3 SIGNATURE we we PETITION
4 F South" emergency are STRONGLY
(----,_ Tamm / as also purchased #Z2012097
-iv / 10,1 PRINT and TO
requested concerned & OPPOSE
i, -.[ iI • NAME police property
%b. . by with in 52012007, the
-c-i -t An Ar,,,, the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
--kpli 0 applicant. for property area Case of
4 this for the
-7,1-3.---) c».--,r)- s-to--- rural values the rural #CPA2012012. acres
5-b31N—XT'IC A PARCEL area COUNTY
- /23 g / .-)-/k6 - # and devaluating, setting The North of
f72 1111717 iffli 1/7.0 LIZ1 LOT the and present Camelback STOP
impact Luke larger
terDzip 'S- /go) 179' of Air lots. zoning & THE
-tLI licltia. ? 7 Force This of East
10. V ta overcrowding air the of
krpf-4-41Q-0 esi--- uiL MAILING space rezoning surrounding Perryville REZONING
Ge5L1-rp De-fmcri in
0 Ortyri ADDRESS our hazards, will
known
\,i schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
DATE: - --Liwe kt AA We increased Russell
3_ (;k also vehicle our are Ranch Z2012097
.2_,1
klik u+rcot V Vit eikii.101 CITY strongly traffic community zoned Phase &
i 34/ I & oppose and R1-18, 4,
tak, „ 9 STATE tranquility much 5, & 52012007
Paid(_ (0,k the accident 6 to
elirk use and larger a
• ZIP of the hazards, high
gC33,6 BgYi-D eisTx/ CODE lifestyles. parcels. density
c isk

name As As We
SIGNATURES dwuL a fi A 1 & significant property property subdivision, the
a/, i LEICA--gbf 4 -/‘)Al 1 "Russell impact undersigned,
voL ilk(14-10Dcoli Ranch owners owners, application
COLLECTED W a " SIGNATURE on we we PETITION
, - PI P. / South" emergency are also purchased #Z2012097 STRONGLY
as
8,2764 es ihr2R7 elk PAU fick- ---"ibtlav '‘.(Z.,*F-QA/ PRINT requested and concerned & OPPOSE TO
(-SD v: D I, JI41----------(361/2(-10774A NAME police property
L - -F-r5x-5- 4 by the with in S2012007, the
06 lluKiecTr IC A Pratinfre services our this rezoning MARICOPA
-1--65 4.___ V 46cAvm.A.,* applicant. for area Case
, property for of
9*-- zLe 94-- 4-- this rural values the #CPA2012012. the acres
isb)--ai-is--1- 5b)----3--).-P-0-- x-)- A -)- PARCEL area rural COUNTY
7-33c --)--is—ef 41( # and devaluating, setting The North of
Mai v q'tr,' ia l 2.4 -km ‘13/ )1.0.4tai 43.3 LOT the and present STOP
.- I impact Luke larger Came'back
(5°S3 ?2/7:33z/) 1E130 .-1,9-4 u-NQ Jea22 LI S-tDa Lileite /e6f4' of Air lots. zoning & THE
(A). /17-zi,Mc/*A. LI 7 64) overcrowding Force This of the East of
CL - , Ac ?-ti--07,iiii_ Ai( -t-Q.,k_4-t-4_tcl d , MAILING air rezoning REZONING
e San 0 '&4, in space surrounding Perryville
oiavno i J Is'-'u (Tc..TN 4.7.6iro4thin ADDRESS our hazards, will
r t,ccvn. A lalve.„1 Cnsa_og-bva,c--4- ee).e.gre, known
br. e:y-i , tA,, a cA 6-It schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
C4e1-- ,1-..q, qz CT A, We increased Russell
/ f also vehicle our are Ranch Z2012097
big-61*J - (A.e/hie Ltkh Li d-f-cjek strongly community zoned &
ur*q-cit; lit6i6aii "AtreAe7s504432ip,,cktipileR-a5re CITY traffic Phase
rieziztjr_gofe4 id obaci Lel AW4At1i%641/4 & oppose and R1-18, 4, 5,
Pork /9 ?cat /9 STATE the accident tranquility much & 6 52012007
03 g ‘,42_ /lac 4a Az use and larger to a
, P6A-k-s_53k 14..k.eg.554..3if ZIP of the hazards, high
0340 g5._.Y6 s753 835-Nb cp,5-3y-_-, FOX CODE lifestyles. parcels. density
fo. A

/ 17- name As As We
SIGNATURES 77-e let ,o7 i significant property property subdivision, the
T 1 4-i,(, "Russell impact undersigned,
co45c 4, /1" Ranch on owners owners, application
SIGNATURE we we PETITION
d ,04/t7;, ,cu-ex&-)62 (11-.1 South" emergency are STRONGLY
-7- / as also purchased #Z2012097
e k /c/a 0 PRINT requested and concerned & OPPOSE TO
„-i-e5_5, 'ck NAME police property
1 R.CF/14.i -7-(46//:9414C by the with in S2012007, the
ct $io eek services our this rezoning MARICOPA
12 iwa- kixt16 k applicant. for property area Case of
14450— this for the the
rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres COUNTY
.A-7 5.4_x_fr3.31, -52):;)--A-1-a1.7 59---4---)-{-3 PARCEL area North
- Aib -ILO # and devaluating, setting The of
i /Mc (;1 r (05 4 36 qa- qi1.-- LOT the and present STOP
3127ce impact Luke larger Camelback
1_,J ifpz--3 .Z- L.:40.-, 1136 /(K) of Air lots. zoning & THE
-irfrri tc le,o4PT a LATLAA:". 3,1 3 Force This of the East
7,1_1 ,60 r 9 overcrowding air of
- f411)(i ft/e-Chne/dAik-,A7 18_ 07. V_ MAILiNG space rezoning surrounding Perryville REZONING
Prilea4/4- 66760.4 e,.)-___CL:14,7 eodc, k4U-AS in our will
tA Deid-o4) ADDRESS hazards, known
01--- •1, schools, compromise neighborhoods OF
DATE: S5-340 _))-- 14-4-e_gA We increased asliussell
3 Pt- o r also our are Z2012097
Li it-sti 1-0t-c„ V: L--, vehicle zoned Ranch
-2q.--/ lttf C_iir-cft-W i-litc6i ' CITY strongly traffic community Phase &
A-2 Ft 2-t, by44Rav\ L;i(-cii—Red, --t4C:1 & oppose and R1-18, 4,
eup6,Q4z, 6- ' , STATE tranquility much 5, & 52012007
' florqkra'2, dd--, 4 the use accident larger 6 to a
of and high
85,L ig-1.4ted R-Pe45396 9Sico ZIP the hazards, lifestyles. parcels.
25-Pid BISkid fr(0 CODE density

name As As We
L fey, significant subdivision, the
SIGNATURES A ". Ali kl r-,1C1 1 "Russell property property
nr--. t ,....• , 1 _ i
74ai-ii 'litho& . A iii . i impact owners owners, undersigned,
)r,06\h,Votiy) 2 Ranch application
COLLEC -50A. coS SIGNATURE on we we
PETITION
7Roi) ivA.. t i / South" emergency are STRONGLY
_ 6 / as also purchased #22012097
et i 1.:51\A-1?4 ,i vel i PRINT re and TO
_......,•Anty viv c>iif.o.,, 4,11. quested concerned & OPPOSE
, NAME police propert
1 ' 192, by y S2012007, the
trs'itAil .,,,, 1 .111M ._.,,,/6z the services with in MARICOPA
&cocks our this Case rezoning
U , applicant. for propert area of
VI . this for the
' ( .9)-- 5-b; rural y the #CFYA2012012. acres
5-7.4-a7 9)---3:7 -7 /U -. a' _zi PARCEL values rural COUNTY
- a.--)- area North
-c-ti--i 3a q7 4OD _so. # and devaluatin settin The of
/ /014 AiliA Al - 34g Lc? (0 LOT the g, g and present STOP
i* impact Camelback
/ 1 /C i (5 Luke larger zonin
g(poq /81--/Et=s 4at 3 0 /83V .S3142,-- 6s-zo 05 of Air lots. g of & THE
5' Force This the East
tA.: LO w. id ti,i i,u, [A) overcrowding of
MAILING air Perr
‘. rti, (SY cizt ode, rezoning surroundin REZONING
i:30-,4,v/ s 4-A4 in space yville
arj-h _-.-‘i-Vt:fsAii Z"..o.4.021-) g-r- Giv ADDRESS our will g
Kf)--mcti6 i i'Vt V40foq_(-,'-u4, 4 hazards, known
a vi IVE- vc .7.11,4L, schools. as OF
7 a 4061R, Ap'e iv& compromise neighborhoods
: _i___ l /ea We increased Russell
,444,9- n ci-- kt also our are Z2012097
Li 6 btu stron vehicle zoned Ranch
K " . r UrdAPY di F CITY gly traffic community Phase &
rl
Z'i7-4,,lige6a4e,?___ t -(=ix,E) & R1-18, 4,
rdillAi 1cl STATE oppose and 5, S2012007
r ak, t,-,r{41:1446AirM2S5:- the tranquility much & 6
" 0 filo:Kr/Az_ Pilz, accident to
42 it-Z use and larger a hi
6S-' ZIP of the hazards, gh
5010 ?sat,c) S7,5?7D g5A, 053ciL Ltt :,•'6.-3 if 65-5 CODE lifestyles. parcels. density
g

name As As We
SIGNATURES „it significant property property subdivision, the
. i A9a42.&<Aithei "Russell
impact owners owners, undersigned,
.)-)1.•., --- Ranch on application
COLLECTED je, SIGNATURE we we PETITION
South" emergency are STRONGLY
BY: ged g4iibinivck-11 / as also purchased #Z2012097
A •(k-L4p PRINT requested and concerned & OPPOSE TO
'er---___ , NAME police property
OF .. by with in 52012007, the
the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
64.kui„ applicant. for property area Case of
_ 5-0n this for the the
- 5-0.2-j:7- - 56.4—'17-7 PARCEL rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres COUNTY
-1 # area setting North
qb I 3 and devaluating, The of
AD Vr? .4 LOT the and present STOP
/ 6 -( impact Luke larger Camelback
11923 HI ig - U31 L ic35'4,--; of Air lots. zoning & THE
'6) lo ( Force This of the East of
_,—.1. t,,I. overcrowding air
0 6.riekiffi MAILING space rezoning surrounding Perryville REZONING
Mil ititm..51-44LA in our will
ADDRESS hazards, known
qii--- 0- schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
DATE: Avg We increased Russell
also our are Z2012097
vehicle Ranch
ii:)-thi, (Jet. L-z-ea-tfwd CITY strongly traffic community zoned Phase &
& oppose and R1-18, 4, 5,
ChrK P4A, STATE the accident tranquility much & 6 S2012007
use and larger to a
ZIP of the hazards, lifestyles. high
ES*-6 F5571 CODE parcels. density

name As As We
SIGNATURES 1A--- ,•.i , ivir..P0- significant property property subdivision, the
.. "Russell
.1'7124 .'.-- impact owners owners, undersigned,
,--`7 ' Ranch on application
COLLECTED (Jfl SIGNATURE we we PETITION
. , • 4,,r. /21/1L4 .1,. South" emergency are STRONGLY
BY: ifiie i. 5 /1 / as also purchased #Z2012097
.4,1,:ex )r 6,4,5\ N PRINT requested and concerned & OPPOSE TO
I bfk-e:&-Pr-- 666er NAME police property
gm Ge4-6-,,6) _)qi-4,4-,4 37ferv.54,-, by with in 52012007, the MARICOPA
46,4,7 _ ,--, the services our this rezoning
Z41 De44/00 , applicant. area Case
,a( for property for of
-s-1/2 To this the the
5-"o., 5),!2-,27-4. .„..-,27--F17 -/ rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres COUNTY
-Aq r-2-7 5,O,-aT7-tpq5S3 "‘PZ"q -L-2,9 -x7 PARCEL area North
- 161 -tri s-0;_,27-131?.930 08) -1 .7. 78- -193 # and devaluating, setting The of
dig 2S7 $ Ziq G //6 1-/ LOT the and present STOP
impact Luke larger Camelback
/42 5 7D ge-67 10s I IA 15101C /8 afal:( ,Yq3 of Air lots. zoning & THE
V '6‘. t W7 6 7 Force This of East
- - ' iu , ) , ,A) overcrowding air the of
- k /56 MAILING space rezoning Perryville REZONING
ZWid legfr-b1Z- tiUkicOrcsio, 41141Vi cpc.Li.264, otiii:D5Z22- in surrounding
411&41e_hela A"1 ADDRESS our hazards, will
'(),7•,'ergilA-Abiel h,17 known OF
4,,v4t at' /4/6 schools. compromise neighborhoods as
DATE: We increased Russell
, . also our are Z2012097
Z, / A __ vehicle Ranch
strongly community zoned &
`tel--FW)b L'Adifitij) la e--ercir-)e_c.,Th CITY traffic Phase
c;;Lo L.7,/-e,kg‘ric,7f4-k- & oppose and R1-18, 4, 5,
ddritit! 4tti STATE tranquility much & S2012007
fir-F f3tek the accident 6 to
„M/Lak- use and larger a
g2r. 490/17,K60 g ' g'c ZIP of the hazards, high
&9.2) FiT)-V 6.3 - 3 &-Yko lifestyles. parcels. density
4'. '3 CODE

1 name As As We
SIGNATURES ia ktel le, , significant property property subdivision, the
a . "Russell
h a r.,f, ( impact owners owners, undersigned,
4 1 or. • Ranch on application
COLLECTED a C tyr6w SIGNATURE we we PETITION
. 0 South" are
BY: - atentielo ----- ,S-1-: / as emergency also purchased #Z2012097 STRONGLY
, Ntoyi 7Ue-Ce/ \\kkeLZ Vi: PRINT
i 6a.LE i f requested and concerned & OPPOSE TO
- -€ NAME police property
At -7--- by with in S2012007, the
1•0,,k-i .„s I. .- Z a the services our this MARICOPA
11-46-T a 4_,i_j Case rezoning
, -7 , applicant. for property area of
cIt cf c this for the
TO 50 i15,2- the
,>`` t goa- !,-..).;_.7- .1- rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres COUNTY
50R---043 - ' il 55 7 7 PARCEL area North
-7 17 ),-i 5-7.z .76f 2-7-Sco i /We # and devaluating, setting The of
1 7 1 Iti-2 19 '7-34a gitO LOT the and present STOP
070 ( 65 ito 9 impact Luke larger Camelback
) if b7le 5-3' 1 iigi / of Air lots. zoning & THE
I cEC) M-- /,riCT /1/0
rt2dgla\vo, '1 15N- ) c c . C- \G 2— Force This of East
a , 75 6 fr ,,, .J, ie.). overcrowding air the of
' t &M, 6 64) / , Irl, i MAILING rezoning REZONING
tig5 - LO ayzl,t WC•cp.f,L\N eltel in space surrounding Perryville
mkote J . Pir , rt, ZI,L_IL. /Ste-i4, 714 o Ajt our will
ADDRESS hazards, known
kkio ig. 0 445-Q--- e L_,,,, 0- 1.,Ft_ 4-Lic schools. compromise as OF
DATE: ,, $Q,-,e_ increased neighborhoods
4..,e We Russell
7\\LA-tre_ also our Z2012097
cit- -/A- if ` Z.-c Li vehicle are Ranch
":35o t 4 Tee( reA strongly community zoned
2-kkkg-eld i3Oeiddeii 4-/a7fie/ta ifril;i‘e Li:Pt- .F CITY traffic Phase &
\,&i,,e L"- 'A. a6 Ice/4 & oppose and R1-18, 4,
A6-- feve-k 1 4e(6.(in/i_ PPRat ,P,4--,a, STATE tranquility much 5, & S2012007
LI( Pak the accident 6
*Ie.-. \ /1--Z_ f7 izA.67ci4&3s3A i 43 use to a
k i42- ,e4e,, and larger
of
* y 1.:5 ZIP the hazards, high
TC510 X 61,555 .655`-tle (86-440 0A5"et-o • .-3 lifestyles. parcels.
s3 W .-eito V 6 CODE density

Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES the
• . South" on we we
0 id as emergency are subdivision, undersigned,
/ also purchased
COLLECTED ic-e_ 4.-ra SIGNATURE requested PETITION
BY: '5-FEU and concerned property application STRONGLY
/ by police
L.-e-qa_rot PRINT the with in TO
EAJL-S 0 r eck 4-(6-61-i services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
7-1 4, ,r NAME applicant. area
/ jee/ ...., Li for property for & the MARICOPA
•1 , LO- ea this the rezoning
I jilt-, rural values rural S2012007.
0-A-- of
area setting The the
6"ea.- 5-0A- 5-6:4- 60A- 5-6 '''' , :46 and devaluating, acres COUNTY
502-A4 -"c PARCEL the and present
.29-1 a`1-2cy 2.1-113 aq-zik, a-al-0.36 coa-c.20 ,a3Lt 5-go--15- 6—oca-47-fl # impact Luke larger North
-11 -p.31 -ftf6 zoning of
, N- 13 4 4 ilc. II i li/ LOT of Air lots. of STOP
I .-k Force This the Camelback
- co i i /PIO/ overcrowding air rezoning & THE
Pgl35 space surrounding East
to 1 , ZT, --Y*)'' in will of
.. IN our hazards, REZONING
/-7 MAILING Perryville
DATE: q1,51 )41 , i 7 schools, compromise neighborhoods
5 S 40“-) (-7- ADDRESS increased
ed,- o We our known OF
Lin . 71-1-r-\.,. / also vehicle are as
ito 416\-v,t ''C-'i strongly community zoned Russell Z2012097
\)---3 traffic
6 2 „ and R1-1.8, Ranch
5e0 J oppose tranquility much &
si )irinceL 741f CITY the accident Phase
c.f , d l & use and larger 4,
biLdnA`-eichlyk- ez-P STATE of hazards, 5, & 52012007
Wr,e_ the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
47e.e. a
name significant As As R1-6,
r53 f,(3 ZIP "Russell property high
MO g55/6 CODE property
4 ,-/-7

1) name As As We
SIGNATURES significant property property subdivision, the
___--------) Dot:144, A -, uu "Russell
.( i , impact owners owners, undersigned,
?7 Ranch on application
COLLECTED ' ie - 7r4p0-1--Rk . _,,ogrAilmw SIGNATURE we we PETITION
mi-eyu fil . South' emergency are STRONGLY
BY:1 ...it / as also purchased #Z2012097
e.' J tb PRINT and TO
Ph ,Th .. requested concerned & OPPOSE
t o 77 AI At NAME police property
tf '' 6 1,---74 Al _ by with in S2012007, the
K),(DyviA (.4/2-7r; A the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
v /76 7-z5c-./ ,..-q_ applicant. area Case
for property for of
#61410-5-4.,..7,_ 5. this the the
-52i2 50a 5Dn.- rural values #CPA2012012. acres
0a---7-o..e) 5-el..-a7-2 ...2,A.--17-7,?,, PARCEL rural COUNTY
i7- -27"-- area North
5v, 47491- ?cc 15 -7-713 # and devaluating, setting The of
)tto 212_ 4_qa 13V 1 .3 1-0-1 )__5 ( 15- 1 - ' LOT the and present Camelback STOP
P impact Luke larger
i 1 I i ircP _5.g.:,-- --Ca3it of Air lots. zoning & THE
3V '53 ot?3_,,1 itgyiy Wy \753(x2 Force of East
V )___ / z(- ,,,„, Ai Ai, overcrowding This the of
1,u Ai, 4/ (4 i L3 MAILING air rezoning
v3, ,o_bc,,iX /-F,-0` c(41)fi_ space surrounding Perryville REZONING
S4-4/ 5 54-K_ FC)1;01.Axie ,k-LOL in our will
tx,„_ N1 a2_ ADDRESS hazards, known
-I-- tAA-0,_ schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
DATE: ) A-G-fc increased
mi We Russell
ovc_ also our are Z2012097
- L„ L 1-, i L i vehicle Ranch
- 6 ep -f. 1-C i)t- -leti--rici-8 fe-iltP (._;•\-cir\, strongly traffic community zoned Phase &
P ti,‘I'ad F i i CRY & R1-18, 4,
ir-- etc] & oppose and 5,
. io /9-(/ S STATE tranquility much & S2012007
the accident 6
Re( P/e A•Ric oilk, use and larger to a
of hazards, high
cr-r3Y0 e53te g-4'3e/o gs:-Ai ZIP the lifestyles. parcels. density
Ps:-..eit CODE
(4(

name As As We
SIGNATURES f significant property property subdivision, the
574co4Aa_ ,,,,,,e17, 1- "Russell
4( ) impact owners owners, undersigned,
' Ranch on application
COLLECTED .i./ asu>, 11,4 SIGNATURE we are we PETITION
ao(-4-. t.- • 4 / South" emergency also purchased #22012097 STRONGLY
IA Y: — PRINT as
(0 A requested and concerned & OPPOSE TO
efirder OT-111 : PaYnelk ,-‘4 NAME police property
\e\rN "74: eilerd"--- .- by with in S2012007, the
Sehl-- ,T"'"_ptVt-6.--, 1"ract 4-wm4 the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
AW 41701\ 1))07LI applicant. for area Case
: this property for of the
6-4- -;5'01 50 a- ct>2_-- rural values the #CPA2012012. acres
I 57vc:-.1ff-775 501-a7-7, 5",,,2,..37,all 5D-t-3`?-(7 50a-c,,L-1-70;1. ;k0 PARCEL area rural COUNTY
7-67— -c)-173 6' 1 14- -0 7/ -65 # and devaluating, setting The North of
Lietj°;; 5(1 41:, 6-1 z 5,() 14-0 )1 44 5 LOT the and present Came!back STOP
impact Luke larger
iiS ,51,Z 5.Nz61,\ /1:S3,9 773_? of Air lots. zoning & THE
72_0) ,-3i.) 14,;11p /6324 oi-tz_co ) Force This of East
.. 1 44.) N overcrowding air the of
ki. (A) A),),C0 86D--- 1062,6j--- MAILING space rezoning surrounding Perryville REZONING
AirVii) tD.,,., puf,Q.•=66/4- ,---,S,, #90(141-e/W rkyLuic, in our will
/7,c47•4----ve `i ADDRESS hazards, known
0 4,6\i,?_ /V. - de schools. compromise neighborhoods as OF
DATE: .466 A,65 /M. R We increased Russell
.1 . also bur are Z2012097
W L, t I-- vehicle zoned Ranch
'..-_\_ckqeid \\J i t-461,4,d, Ltraifi6 b:LtkPiL- rte-aU,Cel (,(4,147( CITY strongly traffic community Phase RA
-Iciti-tem \ 0'., A, V) 7/1 & oppose and R1-18, 4, 5,
1,-- 1 Part /94, .--.N4 4 STATE the accident tranquility much & 6 S2012007
ita,s, N60.< 1,c_ tC-, 4— fz use and larger to a
ZIP of the hazards, lifest high
R.C3 ?:-",rzo 65:3 F53yTi c-zd/tb 1553ci &'•vcj--- 6--3,3-- CODE yles. parcels. density
110

name As As We
SIGNATURES e.--2„ -,eCe. A significant property property subdivision, the
...... it .taibeL "Russell
1-1,0 impact owners owners, undersigned,
_114.4,, 77 Acc,14._ Ranch on application
COLLECTED _ ..--------— SIGNATURE we we PETITION
South" emergency are STRONGLY
BY: f 6babotd tlk----(--0,-- / as also purchased #Z2012097
,31“ • .4 PRINT and TO
4 / #., requested concerned property & OPPOSE
k Toz, NAME police
re,,,,,L 11V okrirAri ,m(ttm by with in 52012007, the
.,:lir,„ kit4 the services our this rezoning MARICOPA
.vss rYt, 5-"R.-' . applicant. for property area Case
for of
5-4.7 „,.. — this the the
rural values rural #CPA2012012. acres
,)-7 br5a-2715,6 2-21-4,15 S-O.---72q 579A-g7-_-5q5-- ,),,,z7.-.0 PARCEL area COUNTY
_ # setting North
31 and devaluating, The of
'-f 2- 53 LA,, 17 35 LPi7 LOT the and present STOP
7i( impact Luke larger Camelback
1 ig 1SCae 45CP] I/ tF5--Y6 of Air lots. zoning & THE
253 i 20 e62-t 5,-,)-q Force This of East
W° ) L.-.L jkr overcrowding air the of
1,--._ Of. z.,,L, , MAILING space rezoning Perryville REZONING
efl ,_5(dcd-) •, 1, in surrounding
oi ali (5Er-3,fc—izg ple":5- 09 ADDRESS our hazards, will
4 known
Aic....- J ' schools. compromise as OF
DATE: AI -i- AO increased neighborhoods
J. Air- ,4-1/4. We Russell
, also our are Z2012097
4. LA ' vehicle Ranch
6,,,re.ii-tgco ik Lz?"6-71,-,€-, c--24c-k LATIAAF strongly community zoned &
l‘ 4 /-::91-c-AICt-tei AE- AZ -( CITY traffic R1-18, Phase
Agri,/ 7 Ps W & oppose and 4, 5,
0 ( STATE tranquility much & S2012007
A.,kr P5(0.- VIL'eVik c( iVIV the accident 6 to
4 A take--,e use and larger a
Ig tAier-62-S5-..tb 1-6-2 CS , ZIP of the hazards, high
.gs---siie 6:5 46651-it) 3 lifestyles. parcels. density
VC) 16, (fp CODE

_ 4/ t Ranch impact owners owners, density We the
SIGNATURES if m.-6 --.7-r- South" on we we
,Jic, , are subdivision, undersigned,
as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED g
rye/ il SIGNATURE! requested and concerned PETITION
BY: 6 by property application STRONGLY
frZ-- police
1 -1---\;,-‘ PRINT the with in TO
, applicant. services our this #22012097 OPPOSE
NAME area
4577'w-7 for property for & the
this the rezoning MARIWPA
rural values rural 52012007.
area setting The of the
and devaluating, acres
50a-c17-5,92-1 PARCEL the and present COUNTY
# impact Luke larger North
zoning of
of Air lots. of STOP
373 15 LOT Force This the Camelback
_ --- overcrowding air rezoning & THE
/7,7,3- space surrounding East
I .-C in our will of
46/ MAILING hazards, REZONING
DATE: L_. schools. compromise neighborhoods Perryville
ADDRESS We increased known
also our are as OF
4,C . vehicle zoned
— )cr strongly community Russell
traffic R1-18, Z2012097
5-- oppose and Ranch
.c;Zo CITY the accident tranquility much Phase &
t & use and larger 4, 5,
STATE of the hazards, & 6 S2012007
lifestyles. parcels.
name As to a
, significant As R1-6,
6-3,-(3 ZIP "Russell property properly high
CODE

We
Ranch Impact owners owners, density
the
SIGNATURES South" on we we
(---{ are subdivision, undersigned,
. as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED SIGNAT
"-- requested and concerned PETITION
BY: i,e-e--11.77/1- •E property application STRONGLY
iiii&CI0471- -,-12,4., / by police
PRINT the with in
j 6 1 services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE TO
r. tiY Lbs KR-i-4-( L je...,-,,,-1-..,* applicant. area
(..'6 0 65&k ME for property for & the
CI P 7/4 c -E:( this the MARICOPA
1S .0e,„- Jed rural values rural 52012007. rezoning
Va. . / ell-4'd of
/ area devaluating, setting The the
;0_-_-;1 52)-,2 ';-e-f) and acres
- `,32,. PARCEL the and present COUNTY
rfr7g -,)63-- -i--o--ig cl— • # impact Luke larger North
t ' Air lots. zoning of
-5 5 of of STOP
LOT Force This the Camelback
I / 9 Lit i overcrowding air
Lt, ? 0 i space rezoning surrounding & THE
4q Z__. --r.36--- in will East
.1 ( f A.) V, our hazards, of
1-1-e_,(GL %/%1, MAILING Perryville REZONING
DATE: 6'r6 (,. schools. compromise neighborhoods
, te .z.ry901 ADDRES increased
PAI-IC re_.. 6C- 1 ,7/{rey-,, We our known
Dr 4 ( 11 1 also vehicle are as OF
AZ e '_ zoned
strongly traffic community Russell
124 Pel Z2012097
R1-18,
Z oppose and Ranch
tranquility much
I :+c irittEffra‘..* Lictk CITY the accident Phase &
cf 1,6( & use and larger 4,
{0( STATE of hazards, 5, & 52012007
eoglet the lifestyles. parcels. 6
./ name to a
Az-- significant As As
Ate-Lis--3qc R1-6,
9,5- ZIP "Russell property property
1446 CODE high

Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES , on we the
c7E. / South" are we
as emergency also purchased subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED Z • .-,-,- SIGNIyItIRE requested PETITION
BY: i 11...."...•:Ld- _Qi and concerned property application STRONGLY
() r , E / by police
1 PRINT the with in TO
Saki --jCik) A 1 W5 tvel, applicant. services our this ta2012097 OPPOSE
lj A i4--,-/q-IF-'f- ccesa4.)(4-61 NAME area
1(1 .r k.) k Wolvk for property for & the
AT k ;_5 XAktie:- this the rezoning MARICOPA
(04i-EoN //64.00 jmf--c 2- g.,e____ q &OE_ rural values rural S2012007.
area of
.e1:4070,f 5o o and devaluating, setting The the
S° 5-00.4:7 54--21-177 5-0A- 9-4-a?-1441 A--)7- - 5A-W-3-1 4%-66-4-- PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
ci-jole41-17.5- eq--- V- 50a-P7-,;,30' 7-3 # impact Luke larger North
-in 339 135 Z-4i 44ktri61 Air lots. zoning of
44 i7e,L15 txl if(do 3 q 3 %If 3159 i ,_, LOT of Force This of the Camelback STOP
17 17 /79:56 overcrowding air rezoning & THE
(°°// filVi Vt kt iScol space surrounding East
/6J q0- c o in will of
Ni' (A) 19-S5eocyaL /di - IA e.-0 our hazards,
i(1,5er__,4iti MAILING Perryville REZONING
DATE: ba-_-- A-(0.-J schools. compromise neighborhoods
(.4-TEA kir24-e-go \-i... 0 tt 6 7-- ADDRESS We increased known
e D/L, u-ed- also vehicle our are as OF
,r zoned
strongly traffic community Russell
R1-18, 22012097
oppose and Ranch
n 12 i , t r . it ,( tA 6i-7-C-kbc'i accident tranquility much Phase &
. CITY the
,E & use and larger 4, 5,
-c.43 STATE of hazards, & S2012007
i the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
- r vt PA-44 name As a
significant As R1-6,
8153q•D 1/ /I vi (63 ZIP "Russel! property property high
Scr) CODE

' .--. L4',11- 2), N.A.- 1 14 Ranch impact owners owners, density We the
SIGNATURES , ) // 1/1,64,1 on we we
(04/?6, kit, South" are subdivision, undersigned,
nke r,, - , "2?& as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED -1-1-0•79, Le 0 ILI ----/---57) 4a SIGNATURE requested PETITION
BY: LI tiv°u'olzo U-A4, /76 fq- and concerned property application STRONGLY
I ' cio. Ci / by police
L , Dordee US/7e PRINT the with in TO
j viA.Ari,)AJi'm services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
riA, avtd 1 Z NAME applicant. area
5e6741-7,7044 _ili‘i4i' for property for & the
...,_—z /' fytto,i\ this the rezoning MARICOPA
t —k ifi sICZ., rural values rural S2012007.
. ,t)i 45 fa i area of
i I setting The the
5-64.- f-tripidaspoite,,nom, 5-0,- 5c 45-"":- 52)Z5 and devaluating, acres
-,47- 54-1_7- 3 PARCEL the and present COUNTY
al ,--7-737 J- -1 ° ° T1 # impact Luke larger North
.-s-v\ toRS- 599 43 ti- , zoning of
riS 133 io .?"17 317 35 LOT of Air lots. of STOP
36 8' Force This the Camelback
/ , 2 overcrowding air
(i33?c . F/33 33 11q14 oil /8-03& rezoning & THE
Ur% space surrounding East
5-- (tx } CCU o. Yzeoi_ CA).- in will of
,,,A.,1 - -,-, vYt MAILING our hazards,
DATE: Ig'53°W°C-(2--ctar1 ez, W Ma/S-hed earL 0 fa_ 4)diuTfr: schools. compromise neighborhoods Perryville REZONING
N dik increased
(1,- ,17 wiWt7/7 ( ik-OC__ 0-e- CA) ' ,4-1/ ADDRESS We known
7-651 (II c} ---(--- Alit, also vehicle our are as OF
.7' strongly community zoned Russell
- ( traffic Z2012097
5Z-Z.) 6 oppose and R1-18, Ranch
( , th4 ,.( , C11-6Fte,(4 6_071.461,61,r ivoh CITY the accident tranquility much Phase &
7 Lr(-cirtfteloici+ilf f. Te..ft713-D i -_,;.-/:(./14.ekoki_ /61-- & use and larger 4,
STATE of hazards, 5, & S2012007
p .19.irLIA- I)-e- ,4-z_ the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
6P.i /17,, name a
significant As As R1-6,
<Fs-5, %3--5cio 85-39S- a(325 ZIP "Russell property property high
-310 c'237551,. CODE

De I/ i Ranch impact owners owners, density We
the
SIGNATURES if. ekLil ---Da-kje- LL P-doe/-1- on we we
I South"
gezit_ri--it 1 6, are subdivision, undersigned,
- & as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED ith47-kemql.) 4 : i-le_c
E -) .sdlcvoc V 4. SIGNATURE requested and concerned PETITION
c ., • cti )itA property application STRONGLY
BY: ,41,44, \ \ l st,,A, I by police
6 •1 Ua, - PRIN the with in
_, .,.; L.4.-11 --DA\.% , r services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE TO
cop, /411r e AM applicant. area
0 1/44 for property for & the
1.-re A(1 Pi cv C-'\ this the MARICOPA
,225,722,4„,........„ .A_ ax rural values rural 52012007. rezoning
k_cA tf_66'-rr a of
- 5 iii-'/ area setting The the
5'0,9, fi-7-4-Z,1 .7;00„. - e J and devaluating, acres
17 - - cb.147- VIA- PARCEL the and present COUNTY
Ai --. ,b'ba---),q-ag. 501.7,4-63 a7 - Iv^ Luke larger North
57-c)16-36t, , ,5, - 57,5 Lk # impact
1i'f,v y (93 Air lots, zoning of
A96 ,47 a Ai e3 LOT of Force This of Came!back STOP
the
t iC,/ ti overcrowding air
4 hsa 9 ISL31 rezoning & THE
e4, Zee iai space surrounding East
1 7---6,47:vcai ao PI l in will of
t,-, Lo i/LI MAILING our hazards,
0 a) Perryville REZONING
DATE: i schools. compromise neighborhoods
611d1-6"10 PA-a-4- • All Le46 oieie&\,v, ADDRESS increased
3 - --K • We our known
a also vehicle are as OF
so[ocf li ),/, community zoned Russell
- le-- t__ , strongly traffic
0-0 ' and R1-18, Ranch Z2012097
.c 64 oppose tranquility
CITY the accident much Phase &
c• tuv'ef'''gez)a z-k)(4-aiaierf & use and larger 4,
eute_efe-4-SC:-. AL STATE of hazards, 5, & $2012007
the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
mcA, er P. lil-- name a
_ significant As As R1-6,
g,63g FS-34) 6-0t) ZIP "Russell property property high
f6,31i_ CODE
:t•

al Ranch impact owners owners, density We the
cjii(yk OcOaf g '11 4472(1 -Too i Immi on we we
rcLf - r ak (fiaot -0Povl.e.t___ South" are subdivision, undersigned,
5 e i L 7.12 F as emergency also purchased
4t ----tc-h (if_5 „Ix ------ ,,t,,,--c<7 ----1-- SIGNATURE/ requested and concerned PETITION
L. - lich,5-K A,C) dra, property application STRONGLY
-e-( de-4.—., 41-6-e-P by police
'fkliici CO PRINT the with in TO
- itt services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
C A ) NAME applicant. area
OVA ii, for property for & the
//7)1 Iflo IP this the MARICOPA
rural values rural 52012007. rezoning
(41/2) of
5 5 area devaluating, setting The the
5'0.- c 5""bg- °'°2 and acres
56a-P-1- -- - PARCEL the and present COUNTY
611-18'5 -1' V # impact Luke larger North
-11 589 3 -27-`350 Air lots. zoning of
S-7Z 47S ,...do 14,--d o Lfr .27 / 1 --7 71 LOT of Force This of Camelback STOP
the
ti:-Ift44: /7 -, /F& L _7 1 IV 44 / 5- E6 overcrowding air rezoning & THE
o& fr161'( /67.2,o 6 1 'S 1,4- c i.,k--c-A, if3( L;40-14i 06, space surrounding East
Vi ED-12_.[Al. ec ct", 7 31, in will of
u0 - LA4 1 e ) cAk_Ce..Q -,Fc-c v0a:, reil-ee-W4-.4 .,- ,ou ,j, MAILING our hazards,
)41 are 9 , ieitr- 141° i ,. el-a /40a schools. compromise Perryville REZONING
DATE: Clitor_ AAoa-i-e-be-1/0 1A 'z -114 & D'e___D Aizi increased neighborhoods
tiIkb-A40)WO v\AW-666 24Z, 4-_ C74-e9r4) ilLYI= Cur ,c e-c-L-- lUic-- I_JU, ADDRESS We our known
/1 )c..- vc, )fr-z_ i also vehicle are as OF
A-tic 0- C---If eC40 L It Q,,_ a-r,e ig- community zoned Russell
a- ,r121,e AL'A ')?_ z , Av-P--, strongly traffic
, R1-18, 71012097
Lusitii., 1-; / r F5-3 1_,i oppose and tranquility Ranch
L_zir-ecc,-s_rd t-c'fr-CL-ce(d PS ,. -- 5- 5 - 'r-3 4_,-f-cks-Cci if-c-kei-`61c1 CITY the accident much Phase &
6190 3 Li & i'- & use and larger 4,
AZ--- 4"CD iL_ 'It 70 STATE of hazards, 5, & 52012007
a-14_ Pdf- Ofre- i4-.. F._(ciiet-g_,..k . ° „4-- P*,--K AZ- ex-4--k_ the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
4.)4-1: A, /Vz--- name As a
significant As R1-6,
. KNO S T5.50 ZIP 'Russell property property high
3 390 53(-.0 53616 53,Lf-c) CODE
L1 ,
0

_ the hazards, parcels. density We
SIGNATURES name lifestyles. the
As As
"Russell significant property subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED property
SIGNATURE Ranch impact PETITION
BY: owners owners, application STRONGLY
/44) / South" on we
In PRINT as we TO
NUAJ NA emergency are purchased #Z2012097 OPPOSE
AP I requested also
-7-1 wt II E and & the ivIARICOPA
x W by concerned property
/4 the police S2012007, rezoning
with in of
applicant. services our this Case the
5°A v for area acres COUNTY
. 4-1 PARCEL this property for
91' 1 the 4CPA201201 North
# rural values rural of
155g191 area . STOP
LOT and setting The Came!back
1 the devaluating, and present ThE
-Ck-22' '€),Airl &
impact Luke larger East
A) w of Air lots. zoning of REZONING
MAILING of
DATE: 0 - Force This the Perryville
P overcrowding
7-zi , -c,Goe7)-A, ADDRESS air rezoning surrounding known OF
4 1 in space
u, our will as
— tl--. hazards, Russell z20.12097
schools. compromise neighborhoods
L We increased Ranch
also our are Phase &
17/`6'-.72-z- CITY vehicle
& strongly community zoned 4, 5,
a . STATE traffic & S11012007
R1-18, 6
A ,K4 oppose and to a
tranquility much R1-6,
gs-2 ZIP the use accident larger high
CODE of and
Ito
_.

Ranch impact owners owners, density We the
SIGNATURES V .31,,,,,, 44 OW South" on we we
win _ t StukStaZ 7ø are subdivision, undersigned,
-5 as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED T7.)INWNV MT/Onag:( ' 1 L& I SIGNATURE requested PETITION
rv\u---)41- / -RV-55 a and concerned property application STRONGLY
BY: ,/fAi7-7 __-/.7 i )\-417'ck'L rota / by police
iiiityli_e_14- flin SLI--..e,us,(V airdef PRINT the with in TO
,7A--7 \' 10 S17ir't -bd?._NeAf-tti jOse,t4 applicant. services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
,i, kpRito at,-/i NAME for property area for & the
--7),,,„ UkTi bead ' Sp this the rezoning MARICOPA
c(,,,,, ,, , , thod-‘'s 'or) % t If-el— rural values rural S2012007.
147 leg , area setting of the
5D t'?561.- 50a, 5-0 and devaluating, The acres
50.1-a-7 5'o--'a7 A- .- al 5oa-,27 afi a ;1- PARCEL the and present COUNTY
--a 4" I10 7 0 - -1; c°a:'"-(17/S-7 - 073 - tt impact Luke larger zoning North of
L4-1 Loq ((' 43 15(4(47 ----- 7- z 733 D LOT of Air lots. of STOP
416 Force This the Camelback
) nqz3 C' Lv4s'ao t___v [ overcrowding air rezoning & THE
0 nocLiz. • ) LI -Orilfizd 447,4 Ato°1-11 t--Ccii, space surrounding East
)-7 L ) IC 0 , 1 ig33s4y\l-elmW ktPud& 4 6 in our hazards, will of
tA) /312n0M40/0CCF 6P i 76-Wei ,4:17? 13, - MAILING Perryville REZONING
DATE: (5re ore3,) Ms--\---91-iThk-) 1.q()-- ciS Pk pic b4-6 /9°7?1 schools. increased compromise neighborhoods
myt t,AkV - ADDRESS We our are known OF
We. L4Lifte_.- -1Dr A-2- also vehicle as
/mit 19-2-g-534:4 egd strongly community zoned Russell Z2012097
.4- traffic R1-18,
2) ,_.I 1. L oppose and Ranch
jr,' 2---- Lfbc CrrakqL/) •.-C-c---6-- CITY the accident tranquility much Phase tic
,,,,f,s-(,(,-It -ct--(a LA-1/4-ei[4evi L,74-61s,-6..10( C,-Ick use and larger 4,
:cUe.,iclAc- ) A-z- LAtcinr-qe.lAtii,c, &STATE of hazards, 5, & 52012007
4-7.-- ek-p- PlaiAz frz-- k-2---- the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
pkg,K eak, elL9-450-3ito i1i-g..{._ ith--gg._ name As a
significant As R1-6,
V-Zqo (9.1.[Z aquto &--4 ,)"..3 801Z g 5 3 g5- qs:34D ZIP "Russell property property high
, t'ff co io CODE
,

_ the hazards, parcels. density We
iiorit iiX. name lifestyles. the
0 '_.:- , (201) As As
SIGNATEHLLECTED -'-' 644 ' (747 Jr / "Russell significant property subdivision, undersigned,
IQ Kr' -,) .,. z A property
44-0k2P,_7 ' • • 114n i SIGNATURE Ranch impact PETITION
. .I: S owners owners, application
BY' 0-,,,,cvw-w5 NigniirAlliw' e L -.4 (I / South" on we STRONGLY
• , '?-c,Nra/.\-- 4.' PRINT we
.-9 A 1 '10 as emergency are TO
,,,i 041(.) 11° NA-0- 4 if also purchased #Z2012097 OPPOSE
Z=A-5" I r/A' NAME requested
kAwSzi-A-r-MN6k-1 C r) ' OF 0 and & the
..e.i,,rt-\14,. k - WincIClv.i, /I ,(._,) 00 by concerned property MARICOPA
-A (li the police S2012007, rezoning
arbtfile" A with in of
`'' applicant. services our this the
55.--- at )5-0A- 56 5P)- io; 5,0 so, r02— for area Case acres
i-3:1- 5-0).-11-7 2 7 PARCEL this property for COUNTY
Y7-11 -2.7-ii25 .23-$0 # the #CPA201201 North
ifal 3 '2 rural values rural of
3472_ 314 '' (IA LOT area setting . STOP
u5' -d--5- -ic AO and The Camelback
1 I g /i the devaluating, and present
,F,Z7 b n'at 11,60q & THE
2,,g- 37 impact Luke larger East
N, M,960,-Tzelitv ( A Lc of lots. zoning of
(.0 I LAJ IA, MAILING Air of
DATE: 4 5-0 rn Force This the Perryville REZONING
00,1-(V4L1 -774,L.,,4--69-,, fo ct overcrowding air
Lit. 444e:4,14a ,10Ayre,&c.co da ADDRESS rezoning surrounding known
*- N. jOr in space will as OF
kire cr ilat,----4 our hazards,
Russell
lope_ schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
We increased Ranch
r t_ptirea,i) il 1, 11 c1,4,4,/ CITY also our are Phase &
& vehicle zoned 4,
strongly community 5,
Ho f ? STATE traffic R1-18, & 6 52012007
I ' /7 A4_6 to
-/17__ oppose and a
tranquility much R1-6,
35' Z1P the accident
6534Z — 'I n E.:554f) j'yo use and larger high
CODE of

the hazards, lifestyles. parcels. density We
SIGNATURES U.A.I-L ' OW 014/9t name the
4,-7 ' --1 As As
1 ' "Russell significant property subdivision, undersigned,
if46-- . ' i el AL-e,dal eh". ASIA/ property
COLLECTED 4-- SIGNATURE Ranch impact owners, PETITION
6'-4' _ ,-- SA owners application STRONGLY
BY: Afir4-1 600 ej / South" on we we
/ ( Ed S. Sat,i d--- a , PRINT as are TO
i-2.). VIE n f- Apo W. emergency purchased #Z2012097 OPPOSE
16,1 1*--1 eiki kt_,L, /019/Ael 1 NAME requested also
Ai 00,+. Att le; and & the
Li/va .1)&21v6Do , e--frfivrivy y by the police concerned property S2012007, rezoning MARICOPA
PEdC- 1._.-aaif , 0 kivi in
in 0 applicant. services with this of
502: -512* 5, 0 our area Case the
is eStg-"24-/7? cog-€29 — .2.- - .i-e9-2-1.1- - - 0 PARCEL for property for acres COUNTY
- 27-6q .,77- 60a-/i-b-H .1-7-131 / 1 - # this the #CPA2012012. North
_ itio c, G S' I.2/ rural values rural of
4/6 'iike r-61,3 DU) % 150439 geg ' ' 7.> LOT area setting The Camelback STOP
& i i 1 1 and the devaluating, and present THE
(i:16(7? ye..52 7124 g 16326, IF017 C-P2/ re504i ,z.,/rik//fierie impact larger & East
/30 Luke zoning of
ixic„ U- kvi id, e4-) MAILING of Air lots. of
tkl-- , 6 - il4m, Force This the Perryville REZONING
/PS 16we cote670- Cer)se6, /1(47",' 4 overcrowding air
A- LbLrEh Le Cf-Vt","1 ADDRESS rezoning surrounding known
n irE, Aq 191E- 4 i41-e- laraei#: in our space will as OF
DATE: < c T. hazards, Russell
r schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
1..i 1-..r Ale We increased Ranch
LI-1-c_6-47d LoAca&-Ee--(----/ 14 Ye 7C-4 Z/41,-/-1 L.7-4‘24Wd CITY also our are Phase &
Lrrcific/V-0 Licroafic_45/14,214._ P'en, & vehicle zoned 4,
6-D.) f=ori,c0 STATE strongly community 5, & S2012007
42- ‘IL ,04-,e, Alf "f2v traffic R1-18, 6 to
rk oppose and tranquility much a
8P6 Aft/‘,3< 1 .c°1;) F5-3 g5-3 .041r547 ZIP the accident larger R1-6,
- g5-3i( CODE use and high
sot v-0 yO 4110 of

- C the We
, 71 , 7 ,,,,,v :70 : , name hazards, lifestyles. parcels. density the
SIGNATURES , )41 As
',.-. 0..hrelie310 L-P1-14X47 / i , "Russell significant As subdivision, undersigned,
property property
COLLECTED .4,;,,, } ,vk SIGNATURE Ranch impact PETITION
' - owners owners, application STRONGLY
BY: " bob ,7 / South" on we
74 .5-9-1k (ij r 4,To PRINT as we
-4_, Udk.A.,(5kt-4,z---1 6).( ONt-if. , S emergency are purchased #Z2012097 OPPOSE TO
t---, //ea- /„. )e. NAME requested also
l'a - - 13 Zeuir and & the
AT 1-7-1 ') ,. "Nog by concerned property MARICOPA
5c.-,Lc.",_ ,,Ne*-k. the police 52012007, rezoning
da‘ ,e I with in of
„-.- 6o 50 applicant. services our this Case the
Efn--w-1.. 50.- 560-- 9'2-27- coa a- for area acres
5).-11- 5-6.-.11 21- t5.-a—Z7-15, •B PARCEL this property for COUNTY
l - (VI - 1 ivs --.21-193 1 ---7-sa n-1/3 # rural the #CPA2012012. North
2- 6 11a,.., 178 i?S 136 0 values rural of
4a r)Vi go CPS Lias 47r. ,--- ,.,T2 O ---7, la -c ".' % 442- LOT area setting The Came'back STOP
and devaluating,
093 7 / . /fp '1 18021. the and present & THE
10,72,2 -‘tc,-3:401 (7612C-tJ ( ?2 /gP:5,P. /c-;;;)- 3i 5 s / 6 impact larger East
Ix) lt.4, 0 diw,?ti/6 Luke zoning of
6e) iv.- ''''' of Air lots.
f;,?-4 ( MAILING Force This of the Perryville REZONING
NrYA-e6 roikr rm., -P, eat- ge-iitab overcrowding
leied-,<‘4-fr2e7 -6-ec4ro 6 , ) ADDRESS air rezoning surrounding known
(16 gi-,. ./ts,e_ vr ibopite. t in space OF
yfie. lir at;i7 our will as
DATE: PCCA-4 t hazards, Russell
61-- ck schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
/1 increased Ranch
.0 We our
L.Lk(0-(a- L e i, 4 / ( 1.1-tc44-F-F-Lfo CITY also are Phase &
-7 hiLedieff 4k9/(64 & vehicle zoned 4,
) o STATE strongly community 5, & 52012007
ç( traffic R1-18, 6 to
42 P.- /9.4-04,- oppose and a
tranquility much R1-6,
ri,?:5-3/1 853 OP5N If 1, I ( It / Wait. ZIP the use accident and larger high
4-C) r O CODE of

S- Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES 'f the
f South" cm we we
t__, as are subdivision, undersigned,
emergency also purchased
COLLECTED
SIGNATURE requested PETITION
fiLI and concerned application
BY: / by police property STRONGLY
S-Ce "17t-(2-4-- PRINT the with in
/) ',27';7I- a services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE TO
i, NAME applicant. area
i for property for & the
a.--1,-r2-,_,C, this the MARICOPA
-L) rural values rural S2012007. rezoning
area of
57 5.-6).-- r and devaluating, setting The the
56g--g7- .500---3:1-173 re Pc 15, ifr. PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
-- 011 - " A # impact Luke larger North
t,3? 373 07 4.1.- - zoning of
).- 1 R I LOT of Air lots. of STOP
ag 2,W 1 c-- 1 Force This the Came!back
i ''' .57ri a overcrowding air rezoning & THE
y) g/ 5---c space surrounding East
5 6 ) in will of
'ui Ln Ai our hazards,
- / k-' MAILING Perryville REZONING
DATE: „De:nit-v. 1 pe schools. compromise neighborhoods
6'z7c. 0-re ADDRESS increased
'7 ,,--(-15, We our known
Atg- p(a,t6,L also vehicle are as OF
r) '4' ,4,•,, community zoned Russell
strongly traffic
R1-18, Z2012097
LA A:-:' and Ranch
• oppose tranquility
--c1A 774--c_ CITY accident much Phase &
41a 4' 14 & the use and larger 4,
I-F.', 5,
STATE of hazards, & S2012007
Pad,(--- II the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
'61'1' a
name significant As As R1-6,
vs-540 c3-4: e5 ZIP "Russell property property high
-?' CODE

Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES pa the
0 &Awl- • South" on we we
7-z4/ Arr. I • if as emergency are also purchased subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED i 11 / 44 -._
N, . , , SIGNATURE requested and concerned PETITION
BY: ___---- , / property application STRONGLY
:74, al Bccoed1/772,,,A,y / P by police
A INT the with in TO
Y1A:.. Vi )_,..., c51 services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
n.._., NAME applicant. area
SA for property for & the
iei 41 „op ' this the MARICOPA
rre,e4x.0-1, 11,--, o Bow,fr„ rural values S2012007. rezoning
rural
area setting The of the
5-z epl-cd 5-0,9.- ‘5.)`).-.17 D5-6:7414 and devaluating, acres COUNTY
5-`).'--771-cill ail..e PARCEL the and present
-J-1--fr ( A-1-a_g7 - 71 # Luke larger North
cie4 AA 67 . impact Air zoning of
61 e,,, " Tv ke2, ,;-.3 LOT of Force lots. of STOP
_. 4 This the Came!back
iipt 184a .s-' RS overcrowding air THE
. 7 Lrieki,; 01 , / 12315 space rezoning surrounding &
3v 0 33 East
kaW tiA a /-- u. )A) (.,.. in our hazards, will of REZONING
/f,36-7z/-,/k in / MAILING
DATE: la/' f,,er Swk, c-p-t are4i0h x:),11'\1\ schools. compromise neighborhoods Perryville
• r increased
19,,4424,-,a742, z fr4n iN t I ADDRESS We known OF
r,F-5:5?) e Fslzto 4/4' Av-e. 1.,e,1, also vehicle our are as
-771 ilve. strongly traffic community zoned Russell Z201Z097
\..)-C
. R1-18,
L oppose and Ranch
0/ LF Z--i—Nk tranquility much &
5/ P, p, CITY the accident Phase
Fr & use and larger 4,
fi-e____ Az_ 0 STATE of hazards, 5, & S2012007
4.2___ the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
• ?„,02L name As a
significant As R1-6,
g53it 3E3 ZIP "Russell property property high
CODE
1716

.......-- /I Ranch impact owners owners, density We the
SIGNATURES ! Ir f P* ift.4... i on we we
South"
'1 iefirsi'doilai 4 .49 4 •11 it as emergency are purchased subdivision, undersigned,
7...9 also
COLLECTED
(7' .. SIGNATURE requested and concerned application PETITION
BY: -• UN% ' dlebt;, / by police property STRONGLY
6va69A/1 kik,' . 01 'Dndv PRINT the with in
1 - services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE TO
01 3(.,/„ NAM applicant. area
to.* MA .I for property for & the
,vov, N0J-c. this the MARICOPA
b55 rural values rural S2012007. rezoning
_s
area setting The of the
g,34-1,et 511mAmk fox.- p,55 and devaluating, acres
, i( PARCEL the and present COUNTY
444 , ..: p 10P-Tw-75- 4;i:-17-7P-i-Ir # impact Luke larger zoning North
of Air lots. of of
479 47T 230 LOT Force This the Camelback STOP
I (1-e /825/ I overcrowding air rezoning surrounding & THE
x-' o3i space East
1-0 o- 14,/ in our hazards, will of
s,,,, MAILING Perryville REZONING
DATE: e9--e.lt - schools. compromise neighborhoods
- . pnej,* Kl.sanfill ADDRESS increased
di ,' We our are known
Ata, ,f also vehicle as OF
4-0-e--- e-I cl._ IV zoned
1 strongly community Russell
traffic R1-18, 22012097
LI- . oppose and Ranch
4,IL tranquility much
I ,ff CITY the accident Phase &
,.e.1, ii &71114e1111 & use and larger 4, 5,
._ Gb9 STATE of hazards, & 6 S2012007
Pe t foti4 1 a P the lifestyles. parcels. to
Alle--- - '16 name As a
significant As R1-6,
(21r1 FC3 ZIP "Russell property property high
ie 3\10' 0 CODE
C

i'l Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES E t Ai on we we the
..(A South"
rti cc: ,/ are subdivision, undersigned,
W / as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED I SIGNATURE requested
and concerned application PETITION
Cik--1-6 77(2/0e7IL it by police property STRONGLY
Litwe,, PRINT the with in
services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE TO
L, NAME applicant. area
for property for & the
kvic)z- this the MARICOPA
rural values rural S2012007. rezoning
area of
6v4w( and devaluating, setting The the
c—c-if--L..- '1/45-0.2-17-070a (2u5Sat-Pfx, 5-62-ZFA tiagil, PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
0,1,1 ea,A. # impact Luke larger North
, Air zoning of
4.z 5 LOT of lots. of STOP
,_ Force This the Cameiback
ret4-- -5---i4 i i$ f overcrowding air rezoning & THE
z- g LMCE_.?;.e 0-- space surrounding East
I , -1 o4' L'ci in will of
t-C ,j. 1c6 MAILING our hazards,
I 1 C.a.,- ea Perryville REZONING
DATE: a K i(LefIc Ilep2- schools. increased compromise neighborhoods
C C't Q'T-H. Q561724(0- .(/ ADDRESS We known
Z. ___ P,i. also vehicle our are as OF
7.7" CF- zoned
Lc strongly traffic community Russell
, R1-18, Z2012097
and Ranch
oppose tranquility much
0 /g i;4-c.LA:4-ka CITY the accident Phase &
iy .Z.- & use and larger 4, 5,
STATE of hazards, & 52012007
the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
,A1*-- name As a
significant As R1-6,
gr ic3vo ZIP "Russell property property high
X CODE
a

the We
,; hazards, lifestyles. parcels. density the
SIGNATURES name
As
(4-,Asi...v. ., 7.,4 , "Russell significant As subdivision, undersigned,
( .. property property
COLLECTED t,..\....,t, _._ .,.. , ,0,._ SIGNATURE Ranch impact PETITION
• \\ c:16..„ owners owners, application STRONGLY
BY: ,,, • ( / South" on we
N.V.I.J.,\.x-c.... &ft) -1,,4- PRINT as we TO
r . 0 vv. emergency are purchased #22012097 OPPOSE
leiv‘ NAME requested also
X Ni and & the
k90,, 11.- by concerned property MARICOPA
46. 1 . -a, v.i„,c", the police 52012007, rezoning
6 1,14 in
applicant. services with this of
•• our area Case the
. - -,-, for acres
,A- _ 4-01-aq-341-1 -„ 501-ai-0214 PARCEL this propert for COUNTY
1 # y the #CPA2012012. North
,- rural rural of
i 1 area values STOP
0 03 LOT and setting The Camelback
V?) k ri 1 the devaluating, and present & THE
\\ 9,ci?, .1 ‘A-t14(A4 impact larger East
5 ( of Luke lots. zoning of
u.) '':*1 MAILING Air of
This the Perryville REZONING
%t;\ iNk, overcrowding Force
ht-o, o\ ADDRESS air rezoning surrounding known
0,06 Ai-- in space will as OF
DATE: QW-tIA ''''' 1 (L. our Russell
gq34-0 hazards,
11- 1 schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
3 ' Ranch
_ L'3. - \ We increased
/?k7.— 09e7... ' ,- also our are Phase &
6 CITY
& vehicle community zoned 4, 5,
STATE strongly & S2012007
c 6-(k traffic R1-18, 6 to
oppose a
and tranquility much R1-6,
,t- ca - ZIP the
3 c(53q0 use accident and larger high
o S'3'.4t) SflA CODE of

Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES lk? the
Ante South" on we we
67? / If - as emergency are also purchased subdivision, undersigned,
COLLECTED .- a .,
r f3TO .-or4w / Ohn SIGNATURE requested and concerned PETITION
BY: . / by police property application STRONGLY
14-1/ j P PRINT the with in TO
1(14.4 applicant. services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
/ i NAME area
6L.J> ;,--_,,p-ivi —7P7-7'.1-'41 ,S ? for this property for & the MARICOPA
7--/-04,QT&A.) the rezoning
ei— ef,., rural values rural 52012007.
i-f r area setting of the
boa- _ c; and devaluating, The acres
A/014 A-11-a ,--(--. %),J A3.47-stli, PARCEL the and present COUNTY
Z- •/ i_-.7-of ae-..,77-6,5f 1A-Vamo, , # impact Luke larger North
5cIo 942 i%v Air lots. zoning of
.7e/ ,--5 if 7 o 4 2N f-P25 (90/ Id LOT of Force This of Camelback STOP
the
/ \ C'3 i____7 / t'5- overcrowding air rezoning & THE
o 7' /834/O (-0(7 tcr---}4,,0 space surrounding East
/ 2q -r-e.,( Po, -.q in will of
9) lit ta vo 4 MAILING our hazards,
, mc.-. U) Perryville REZONING
DATE: rin schools. compromise neighborhoods
40 ‘-6-zy-dc6A46 W-VILDAL-clae(( increased
c:-..25 /2,167,1Ade 0-e-)----t goiniebeVbik&- ADDRESS We our known
Aqii,A also vehicle are as OF
11-1/&-- ID Az- 4- strongly community zoned Russell
eil- traffic Z2012097
L;-‘.- oppose and R1-18, Ranch
4 i A-6.0-i CITY the accident tranquility much Phase &
0,7z P L&1 & use and larger 4,
ei STATE of hazards, 5, & 52012007
the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
dc name significant As As a R1-6,
'F--5 W3Y ZIP "Russell property property high
cid 9 ( C2-3- CODE

Ranch impact owners owners, density We the
SIGNATURES South" on we we
as emergency are subdivision, undersigned,
also purchased
COLLECTED 4 SIGNAT requested PETITION
BY: , E and concerned property application STRONGLY
/ by police
PRINT the with in TO
applicant. services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
619tt,e- NAME for property area the
this for & MARICOPA
rural values the rural S2012007. rezoning
area of
l,_ 5a0,-- and devaluating, setting The the
PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
21 - # impact Luke larger North
td.43 of Air lots. zoning of STOP
5 LOT Force This of the Camelback
overcrowding air THE
/g space rezoning surrounding &
East
3d-s---- in will of
MAILING our hazards, REZONING
, Perryville
DATE: schools. compromise neighborhoods
og,--0,,,,s, ADDRESS We increased known OF
27 also vehicle our are as
5- 6 strongly traffic community zoned Russell 12012097
and R1-18, Ranch
. r oppose tranquility much &
/(7t CITY the accident Phase
& use and larger 4, 5,
-- STATE of hazards, & 6 S2012007
. the lifestyles. parcels. to
name significant As As a R1-6,
ZIP "Russell property property high
CODE

, the hazards, parcels. density We
SIGNATURES tka"" ----c--..k- , Z name lifestyles. the
1111,0 - ; - - - ,...-- As As
CiAAR_Le5T-, CA/ N -, , , "Russell significant property subdivision, undersigned,
- , - - '--- property
COLLECTED e,"---f Ill A - i --z,----' SIGNATURE Ranch impact PETITION
\ v._ : M-44 6 iliff owners owners, application STRONGLY
BY: 60p-DoM /A a_cr_Lo, ve i / South" on we
.cz_9- it "...) t10,.._ 1 '-{%-7 ,144./-4-&_. PRINT as we are TO
ca 64,14 emergency purchased #Z2012097 OPPOSE
Tg-, .., Kr NAME requested also
,-. , and & the
• -----.--,-- 3.- Ge".46 by concerned property MARICOPA
g-c.„4z.-- C the police 52012007, rezoning
in
applicant. services with this of
55,2 6? 502- our area Case the
5.2).5241- 5c)a- -,)- for for acres COUNTY
60a.-17-515 caj-a7-755" 5bJ.-X-679 -(2/-1 1 - PARCEL this property the North
'9-1-165 D -21 24- # rural rural #CPA2012012. of
,113•Y4s, 41 area values STOP
33 03 q563 45 -2-(0 'x13 41 C, LOT setting The Came!back
and
1 SS 6,, 1 \--Liz3,:--\ i.Ozo 1 g gti i the devaluating, and present & THE
) '82 '2- trvik impact larger East
17--- --. S 1 p- Luke zoning of
0 , 14), Liv) 0 , MAILING of Air lots. of REZONING
IA 4 , 61 u..1,94,4c,,, Force This the Perryville
°09--Ercot,i A i-e----cLie 7-2,,,,,,....,, Liti,C'1-.^CtIoirrr- (-A.,cf overcrowding air rezoning
- mailv-kbeilo ADDRESS surrounding known OF
in space will as
Ave- A C.). our
DATE: , /ke hazards, Russell
ei schools. compromise neighborhoods Z2012097
''\:_.: '-‘ We increased Ranch
Lriu6le-u) Wadiitti ' li4- also our are Phase &
i4-1-,44,11 CITY
j---S-1----O/(t( • /CrLf,0 Ade & strongly vehicle community zoned 4, 5,
1;44 7-6-14ce714:4/6 ti STATE & S2012007
4 4.7,, Pkij-e- A traffic R1-18, 6 to
) Az A424 2-- oppose a
a \(-- - and tranquility much R1-6,
%-zs• ZIP the
963+0 fs----,3vo 6353- 8534\ P'k) gg-D CODE use accident and larger high
- of

_ r / Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES 7' / the
South" on we we
01-r. ii<z--;7472,..ki , are subdivision, undersigned,
o'lla 1 12/ as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED /n /:.f. /1
r-o dIMAri : SIGNATURE requested and concerned PETITION
BY: '' ir 6-S0d /./ ,. / /iffil / by property application STRONGLY
4 . ;(7 PRINT the police with in TO
cRQ,7101-/ce.„ 1-.-D ,90,67171r \0 services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
ce NAME applicant. area
ftiA 4 6;t-x, H Ay for property for & the MARICOPA
i 1). this the
A Arc.,4.' rural values rural S2012007. rezoning
„pp tc)7
-dav9//a/c/- area setting The of the
509:- 5-69- 5.--;a: 5-4' and devaluating, acres COUNTY
--5.0..1,,oci .---g-7-- PARCEL the and present
jai- iiiiS g" 1-754i 5-01-1-7-7-Nr.- -S- . 1 iir # impact Luke larger zoning North
1 . 47 ., 53 ) Air lots. of STOP
q der 19-7 1,(37 If 4 443 LOT of Force of the
a_ This Camelback
IF i ,g overcrowding air THE
icigo, (19- /85,75 5 O space rezoning surrounding &
;3 East
14/, ;281 --g 6 in hazards, will of
- zo tio (,.. MAILING our REZONING
DATE: 0 Of Pli-,cSc9ciler' schools. compromise neighborhoods Perryville
tiv I-2 0 ADDRESS increased
6v 5 111,Ci5-soLLo We our known OF
SOU-4 ,.44. Y‘e-76'" also vehicle are as
Rt3g- ok-o_.- Ct strongly traffic community zoned Russell Z2012097
R1-18,
ij Lii:(-1‘ _____ kid, 6 , oppose and Ranch 24
0( ,Peocicifce- C: accident tranquility much Phase
+-0„(k-C-:( CITY the
.,/,/ l_ciN-r-c'eid & use and larger 4, 5,
tG( STATE of hazards, & S2012007
172, ie.-4_ the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
-PAtg- , re name a
significant As As R1-6,
fillE's-3)1-6, ZIP
ves--kc 65-3((p "Russell property property high
55Y0 CODE
,

Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES <7,1-6,0 feZet the
,---- 'y '--' South" on we we
5 =7:7 are subdivision, undersigned,
AAlkcjk, ..alt.Zr, Ie- as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED at-----.1
C Milk 'Iv,' - c--Pi-l SIGNATURE requested and concerned PETITION
BY: --L) /LF / by police property application STRONGLY
72e--Af 0 PRINT the with in
/1 ,LIA(---- Pi C- 4. services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE TO
7- NAME applicant. area
FO&P/6(- P for property for & the
&tititiqqj C this the rezoning MARICOPA
oft rural values rural 52012007.
44.4-- of
area setting The the
5:6 and devaluating, acres
5( 5-oJ--A71'- .,- 5-22-3.-40 PARCEL the and present COUNTY
x -t # impact Luke larger North
f7 . 3? Air lots. zoning of
, 16/ 3 . q '1-36 / 'A-'7 361 LOT of Force This of Camelback STOP
8 ' , the
I I /), t t 7 overcrowding air
IN)-3- g /$- space rezoning & THE
/F0/9 Fa9-0 6* 36- o0/9 surrounding East
tiLl. in will of
cc? our hazards,
A e MAILING Perryville REZONING
DATE: 1,,i6e,eAre4 0 schools. compromise neighborhoods
7-0/Zr6/14i q-----or.4-1001. sr 4 increased
/-7L- .9 6 ADDRESS We known
(it 67 'c also vehicle our are as OF
-- A--PE"
strongly community zoned Russell
traffic
R1-18, Z2012097
t 21- i G',. oppose and Ranch
Pfre-k \;11;Vl iztpr ' i= 0/ I accident tranquility much Phase &
;iti,j,tccEic( / Pew' CITY the
1 /1 -U0' 4,--a & use and larger 4, 5,
4- 0- ,°W -", STATE of hazards, & S2012007
z- Ozice-k_ /1-7-- 13-CZ Z--- the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
let name a
significant As As R1-6,
Sf-L-3 ;,---,c-- s-.3 O's - - - ,5-..c..77..5-- ZIP "Russell property property high
gs3cfr to 49 co CODE

i Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES e the
_ if_zA,,,ead• South" on we we
4, are subdivision, undersigned,
_44. 1 as emergency also purchased
COLLECTED 5 , , , i SIGNATURE requested PETITION
_i 5 Ae-/-rZ 1101,&// and concerned application
BY: IAA h / by police property STRONGLY
PRINT the with in TO
l'r -4Aed," Pt applicant. services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE
....,, 0 Af4/ NAME area
4" , mini ve-4 , for property for & the MARICOPA
,...,( I this the rezoning
rural values rural S2012007.
area of
s 4! devaluating, setting The the
and acres COUNTY
, Da-37-3.16 5a-47—Ito PARCEL the and present
# impact Luke larger North
of Air lots. zoning of STOP
37 i LOT Force This of Came!back
the
i /P-0 overcrowding air THE
space rezoning surrounding &
ic-03 "G in East
i our hazards, will of REZONING
6 MAILING Perryville
DATE: schools. compromise neighborhoods
ADDRE increased
oc.3g,,,z We our known OF
S also vehicle are as
ei--- , strongly community zoned Russell 72012097
traffic
) R1-18,
; L oppose and Ranch
CII- j tranquility much &
CITY the accident Phase
use and larger 4, 5,
&STATE of & S2012007
„,-,_____., ge-- the hazards, lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
name a
significant As As R1-6,
ZIP "Russell property property high
CODE

Ranch impact owners owners, density We
SIGNATURES )216.x. 6€406.E. on we the
cl--r-St-Np.Li South" we
e as emergency are subdivision, undersigned,
- i .1:-.6, also purchased
COLLECTED
l'I/z/i17)— 46-ie&b Ro P.-- SIGNATURE requested and concerned PETITION
BY: rza.... rINN-f-- \._.).--).---.),3N--s\--- t-ttNiis ()Q4-0., property application STRONGLY
N.. / by police
0 sE/440/2_y V__ 1-2 /, PRINT the with in
Kah_,\Nr, i..,.. services our this #Z2012097 OPPOSE TO
NAME applicant. area
. 9,I.c., 3p,--z-EiN.A,3 for property for & the
k-1/4----r this the rezoning MARICOPA
rural values rural S2012007.
area of
570 and devaluating, setting The the
5-09._- 51%1- g-- PARCEL the and present acres COUNTY
5671-17479 27- xl 55J--,)7-gog North
a'? - # impact Luke larger
-i751- /36 Pa Air lots. zoning of
W. 105 a-yo ''5 LOT of Force This of Camelback STOP
the
3,2,27 (7 t g t, k- overcrowding air rezoning & THE
I (. B k space surrounding East
41F(EL-P A) ci..,, Cf o '.- in will of
e t..._ our hazards,
e.) - MAILING Perryville REZONING
DATE: ,S,44...) schools. compromise neighborhoods
Fii9X•iet, cenc7-&--fe olM 316... ADDRESS We increased known
Ili our
ve—( MI.3 also vehicle are as OF
ill
c) 577 AU Qc_) strongly community zoned Russell
v-- _ traffic Z2012097
----r and R1-18, Ranch
(-- r (_, oppose tranquility
c CITY the accident much Phase &
e'A--g---kc-- .s,--,_v„ci,__\ & use and larger 4,
,zziI j A,z--- STATE of hazards, 5, & 52012007
A. the lifestyles. parcels. 6 to
fedi/ name a
significant As As R1-6,
erCT 6' '_,,3 ZIP "Russell property property high
/-10 y 0 CODE

W Montebello Ave
W San Miguel Ave
W Luke Ave
W MarshallAve
VV Eim St
Opposition Case Summary Legend
* Note: All Area calculations represent the area of the parcel inside the 300' Buffer
Interstate Highway
Eligible parcels - excluding subject parcel: 117 State \US\ Other Highway
Supporting parcels: 0 Interchangelkamp
Opposition parcels: 60 Arterial
Supporting parcels sq ft: 0 Local
Opposition parcels sq ft: 742,499.05
Subject parcel sq ft: 5,748,009.31 E2 Supporting Parcefs
All area inside the 300' buffer: 10,299,523.38 ffi Opposition Parcels
All area inside the 300' buffer - excluding Subled. Parcels
subject parcel, ROW and excluded parcels: 3,645,682.48 0 300 Buffer Interior
No-response parcels sq ft: 2,903,183.43 0 300' Buffer
Super Majority opposed parcel acres: 20.37%
300' Buffer Selection
Super Majority opposed parcel number: 51.28% 1 "= 625 '

RESOLIVIM.h OF A[IvtiE -Atai[:
Mark pa C Lally BM.,51FE: Slupenisons3
Eye to the Future 2020, Maricopa Cotmty Comprehensive Plan
Resolution Amending the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan —
White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan
Case Number: CPA2012012 (Russell Ranch South)
February 18, 2015
BE IT RESOLVED by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors as follows:
WHEREAS, Maricopa County adopted its Comprehensive Plan and
White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan in accordance with Arizona
Revised Statutes to help bring about coordinated physical
development consistent with the present and future needs of
Maricopa County; and
WHEREAS, Maricopa County recognizes the importance of having a
comprehensive plan amendment process so that this plan can be
responsive and flexible to meet the changing conditions of Maricopa
County; and
WHEREAS, Maricopa County has procedures to determine when
comprehensive plan amendments are necessary, how comprehensive
plan amendments are processed, and at what point comprehensive
plan amendments can be presented at a public hearing by the Board
of Supervisors, upon recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, Arizona Revised Statutes requires that amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan be approved by resolution of the Board of
Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors has carefully
considered this comprehensive plan amendment, has held a public
hearing regarding this comprehensive plan amendment, and finds
that this comprehensive plan amendment constitutes an overall
improvement to the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan, the White
Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan, and to Maricopa County in general.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the comprehensive plan amendment for
case number CPA2012012, is hereby approved this 18 th day of February 2015.
Chairman Date
Clerk of the Board Date
k
Director, Date
Planning and Development Department
Date

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Dianna Barclay <jd1k918@grnail.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:06 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Zone Change
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Maricopa County Department of Planning & Development Board of Supervisors
Planning & Zoning Commission
502 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Board of Supervisors & Planning & Zoning Commission:
Due to a death in the family my husband and I are not able to attend this meeting we do however want to stand
with our neighbors voicing our opinion on this matter.
I am sending this letter to voice my strong opposition of the application for the rezoning on
Comprehensive Plan Amendment # CPA2012012, Zone Change 14 Z2012097, and Preliminary
Plat # S2012007 for Russell Ranch South, high density subdivision. The proposed changes are
not consistent with the current zoning. They do not conform to the comprehensive plan for
Maricopa County for this area. I am NOT opposed to the current zoning of R1-18, one to two
houses per acre, which it is already plotted, but I am against the small lot residential R1-10
which the application is requesting.
Thanks so much for your time.
John and Dianna Barclay
18542 West Georgia Ave
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
Lot # 98
Tax parcel Number 502-27-660
1

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Robert Watkins <watkins.r@sbcglobatnet>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 11:46 AM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: Case #Z2012097
I strongly object to the rezoning from R1-18 RUPD.to R1-10 RUPD. I live within 300 feet of this site. This will greatly
affect the traffic and safety with this high density of new homes.
Sincerely,
Robert B. Watkins
18312 West Denton Avenue
Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
watkins. r@sbcglo bal. net
623.853.9560
1

Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
From: Darren Gerard - PLAN DEVX
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 4:02 PM
To: Rachel Applegate - PLANDEVX
Subject: FW: Russell Ranch South - Case #CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and
preliminary plat # 52012007
Attachments: Existing Russell Ranch and Russell Ranch South Retention.pdf; Retention Area ljpg;
Retention Area 2jpg
For attachment to BOS short report
From: Ed Artz [mailto:ejartz@grnail.corn]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 4:00 PM
To: Darren Gerard - PLANDEVX
Subject: Russell Ranch South - Case #CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and preliminary plat # 52012007
Dear Chairman Hiatt and Board of Supervisors,
I am writing to hopefully clarify a topic that was discussed yesterday morning regarding Case
#CPA2012012, Zone Change # Z2012097, and preliminary plat # S2012007. The topic was
regarding retention of water from Russell Ranch Phases I, II and III. The applicant asserted that
they would have to spend in excess of $111/1114 to satisfy county water retention requirements and
wanted to use that as the basis for increasing the number of lots to compensate for additional costs
and loss of developable land. However they were really confused with the facts surrounding the
situation.
To mitigate this, I did a little legwork to help bring some facts to the situation:
Russell Ranch Phase IV has already had significant water retention basins in place years before the
applicant purchased the properties. AZ Premium, the previous developer, was required by the
county to add additional retention to the project because of a change in requirements to have
landowners retain 75% of water vs the 45 % requirement that was in place when Phases I, II, and
III were built. To accommodate this, AZ Premium spent about $700,000 to add the retention basins
to phase 4 shown in the document attached called 'Existing Russell Ranch and Russell Ranch South
Retention'. I went to the site and using my laser range finder measured the two retention basins and
determined that they are capable of holding approximately 98,000 cubic yards of water. This was
what the engineer indicated was required for all the phases up to and including phase 5. Phase 6
was not included since it was going to go for approval in the future. AZ Premium indicated that
they lost land equivalent to 20 lots to make space for the two retention basins.
I believe the applicant's representative significantly overstated the cost for retention needs and for
the developable land impact needed to add the incremental additional water retention required by
the planning staff, since most if not all of the retention needs already are in place. There is a lot of
double counting trying to obfuscate the situation. A big part of their claim is already
comprehended by the work already performed and in place.

I also attached pictures of Retention basin 1 and 2 as labeled on the satellite picture in the first
document attached for reference.
AZ Premium also indicated that their plans called for adding the following number of houses on the
the remaining three phases:
Phase 4 - 110 lots
Phase 5 - 25 lots
Phase 6 - 80 lots
Total New- 215 lots
don't have the acreage for the three phases, but the planning staff does.
Regards
Ed Artz
Note: Darren, would you please send me an email reply indicating that you received this email?
2

—
iTLp:'- 1
1
di _
et
— -"I Au
o
eg
Retention - r
z=n1,411
South
eorilia_LCI__
;
Ranch IL he•r
'
•..rm
:1111_6 , ViAlreg
Russell
14s ir lir
- 5.2.2-27,
and L6
2 yards
Area
Ranch 1 yards cubic
Area Drainage
E/CYNTHIA cubic 56,100
Russell Drainage
42,200
DAVID •
_ •
'
Existing . ' HILLIARD
.50Z-7-9-?f4 Owner: FkIDU: 552=29-333 -I
•
i6 _ AZ r" 355 •
,:
1-sol=t AVE, IS02:729:
OREGON
a•T:‘
wid2c W
- :•7"--) 502-27-598 P
18330 iror
P IDi'27,8S57;
IJI : N mL:
• rql•



Unofficial
Document
When recorded mail to:
Name:
Address: 2011—uaaaa -is u'uiyiii U41 35 PM
1 OF 1
FLUREEIC
City/State/Zip:
this area reserved for county recorder
• CAPTION HEADING: .
-est_cor-c)i 471LA etvSc'
DO NOT REMOVE
This is part of the official document

20110333313
This document was recorded without OFFICIAL RECORDS OF
EXhihrl's .Bianti C. due to format; MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER
Copy on file at the Clerk of the Board's
office, 301 W. Jefferson, 10th floor, HELEN PURCELL
Phoenix, Arizona, 85003 20110296740 04/07/2011 11:28
ELECTRONIC RECORDING
When Recorded, Return to:
C0B459-15-1-1--
Maricopa County Planning and sarabiam
Development Department
501 North 44th Street, Suite 100
Phoenix, Arizona 85008
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Russell Ranch IV & V, Marieopa County, Arizona
C. L414. ll . O1t a1 - OD
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made by and between
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, vision of the State of Arizona (the
"County") and WESTERN RE INC., a Colorado corporation
("WREI"). The County anciA to in this Agreement as the
."Parties," - and are sometime
A. Arizona Revi counties to enter into
agreements with landq perty concerning any
matter relating to the
B. The Marico rvisors") recognizes
that it must exercise i ner that protects the
County residents and
C. The Marie° 1Cottnty BOi the Director of the
Maricopa County PI anti -D tor") to compromise
zoning and development; ce agreements, by the
Director or the designee of diredopap 'bag&
D. Arizona Business ).ss Ihe efidtaIy#er that certain Construction
Deed of Trust dated May 11, 2 reoided ol 2006 as Instrument No 2006-
0649579 in the Official Records o Arizona, as modified by that certain
Modification of Deed of Trust dated May 11, 2008 and recorded on June 12, 2008 as Instrument
No. 2008-0523441 in the Official Records of Marieopa County, Arizona (collectively, the "Deed
of Trust").
E. The Deed of Trust is recorded against, and imposes a lien upon, approximately 68.13
acres of real property located in the County limits, as more particularly described on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and as depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B " (the "Property").
F.' ABB has commenced 'foreclosure proceedings under the Deed of Trust and WREI,
which is an affiliate of ABB, will take title to the Property in lieu of ABB if WREI is the
successful bidder at the trustee's sale (the "Trustee's Sale"),
G. WREI does not intend to develop the Property if WREI acquires it at the pending
Trustee's Sale; rather, WREI intends to sell the Property to be developed by a future owner
("Future Developer").
QB\ 122777.00050\1144756].g
MCR 1 of 16

20110333313
20110296740
11. The Board of Supervisors has determined to enter into this Agreement to mitigate the
impacts of development of the Property and for other reasons of public policy to protect the
health, safety and welfare of the residents and taxpayers of the County.
1. The Parties acknowledge that, as of the Effective Date (as defined below), conditions
exist on the Property that constitute violations of the Zoning Ordinance for the Unincorporated
Area of Marieopa County, the Maricopa County Draniage Regulations and the Maricopa County
Subdivision Regulations (collectively, the "Existing Violations").
J. WREI and the County desire to enter into this Agreement to (i) define WREI's
obligations with respect to any violations of applicable law, ordinance, regulation, administrative
ruling or decision pertaining to the condition of the Property, (ii) set forth the County's
agreement to promptly process any application to revoke the Final Plat of Russell Ranch Phase
IV, recorded Book 847 of Maps, Page 40 in the Official Records of Maricopa County, Arizona
(the "Phase 1V Plat"), whether such application be made by WREI or any subsequent owner of
the Property, (iii) set forth the County's agreement to cooperate with a Future Developer in
processing submittals pertaining to the development of the Property, which will include a
replacement plat and which may also include a request for increased densities in the development
of the Property, (iv) memorialize the Parties' agreement to settle the Existing Violations, and (v)
such other matters as set forth herein.
K. The County is entering in to this Agreement pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 11-251, 11-251.05
and 11-1101 at seq.
L. This Agreement shall serve as a compliance agreement, resolving any and all Existing
Violations on or pending against the Property. WREI shall be responsible to the County for any
violations that may occur during the period of WREI's ownership of the Property.
Unofficial !Document
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual promises
and agreements set forth in this Agreement, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
Article 1. Drainage System.
• 1.1. Existing Retention Basins and Drainage Channels. The Parties acknowledge the
existence of two (2) retention basins located on the Property as depicted on Exhibit "C" attached
hereto (collectively, the "Retention Basins"), and certain drainage channels on the Property
which direct surface drainage into the Retention Basins (collectively, the "Drainage Channels").
The Retention Basins and Drainage Channels, together with any other improvements upon and
within the Property (including, but not limited to, the existing grading of the property) that
handle, direct, retain, convey or discharge any drainage onto, within or from the Property are
referred to in this Agreement collectively as the "Drainage Systeni".
1.2. Drainage System Maintenance Obligations, If WREI becomes the owner of the
Property, WREI shall, at its cost and after obtaining all required Permits (as defined in Section
1.3 below), take the following actions and any other actions necessary to maintain the Drainage
System as it exists upon the date WRE1 becomes the owner of the Property:
:2-
QN122777.00050\11447551.8
MCR 2 of 16

20110333313
20110296740
1.2.1, Erosion Repair and Grubbing. WREI shall repair any erosion damage to the
Retention Basins and Drainage Channels as and when necessary from time to time to ensure
the proper flow of water through the Drainage Channels and retention of water in the
Retention Basins. When WREI undertakes any erosion repair, it shall also concurrently grub
applicable sections of the Drainage System of any vegetation, as necessary.
1.2.2. Larvicide Treatment, Any time water remains standing on the Property for longer
than thirty-six (36) hours after a storm event, WREI shall, promptly after such 36-hour period
(subject to any delay due to obtaining any required Permits), cause the sections of the
Property where there is standing water to be treated with larvicide as reasonably necessary to
prevent mosquito infestation therein.
1.2.3. Fencing. WREI shall maintain, repair and replace, as and when necessary, the
existing fencing surrounding 'Retention Basin 2" as depicted on Exhibit "C" attached hereto.
1.3. Permits. The Parties acknowledge that the work required under Section 1.2 above may
require permits issued by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department, the
Maricopa County Department of Transportation and other federal state, county and local
agencies and entities ("Permits"). WREI shall submit all applications necessary to obtain the
Permits as and when necessary to perform the work required under Section 1.2 above, and WREI
shall diligently pursue the issuance of all required Permits.
1.4. Existing ViolationsiResolution. The County hereby agrees that neither ADD nor WREI
or any affiliate of ABB shall have any liability or responsibility whatsoever to cure the Existing
Violations, provided that WREI is in compliance with its obligations under this Agreement
(subject to all applicable notice and cure periods contained in this Agreement).
1.5. Assurances. Within thirty (30) dayas 026-07,X,IREI becomes the owner of the Property,
WREI shall post a financial assurance in the form of cash, letter of credit or performance bond
for the benefit of the County, in the amount of $1,500.00 (the "Assurance"). The Assurance (or
the proceeds, if the Assurance is in the form of a letter of credit or performance bond) shall be
available to reimburse the County for the reasonable costs of any larvicide treatment of the
Retention Basins undertaken by the County on behalf of WREI as permitted under Section 3.1 .
below. If the County draws Upon the Assurance pursuant to this Agreement, WREI shall replace
or replenish the Assurance up.to the foregoing amount within seven (7) days after written request
from the County. The Assurance shall be terminated and any remaining funds released to WREI
upon the termination of this Agreement.
1.6. Inspection by County. The County shall have the right tO enter upon the Property at any
time during the term of this Agreement to inspect the Property for compliance with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement
• 13. Access for Maintenance. The County hereby grants to WREI the right to enter upon and
over any County easements or rights-of-way for the purpose of performing WREIrs maintenance
• obligations under this Agreement, and for the purposes of maintaining, repairing and replacing
any other improvements upon or within the Property which exist as of the Effective Date of this
• Agreement or approved by the County after the Effective Date.
1.8. No Work on the Property. Other than to comply with Section 2.2 below, WREI shall not
construct any improvements upon the Property, including without limitation, any material
alteration of the Drainage System, or otherwise develop the Property. Nothing contained herein,
however, shall be construed as limiting the ability of Future Developers to pursue any and all
-3-
W122777.00050131447561.8
MCR 3 of 16

20110333313
20110296740
• land use and any other approvals from the County in connection with the Property, and the
County hereby agrees to cooperate and consider any and all applications and requests for
approvals submitted by Future Developers in connection with the Property pursuant to applicable
ordinances and regulations.
Article 2. Plat Revocation and Subsequent Development Approvals.
2.1. Plat Revocation. Development of the Property will require new platting and engineering
plans to address the existing drainage issue. Accordingly, the County hereby agrees to diligently
process a request submitted by WREI or any Future Developer to revoke the Phase IV Plat in
accordance with applicable laws, ordinances and resolutions.
2.2. Subsequent Development Approval& The County hereby agrees to fully cooperate with
WREI and any Future Developer in reviewing and processing any development plans for the
Property, which may include, without limitation, a replacement plat or plats and requests for
increased density in an effort to offset economical losses due to a reduction in the developable
area within the Property resulting from the need to re-engineer the Drainage System to
accommodate flows from other areas of the Russell Ranch subdivision.
Article 3. Default; Remedies. hftp://recorder.maricopa.govicert
3.1. Default; Remedies. If either Party defaults (the "Defaulting Party") with respect to any
of that Party's obligations under this Agreement, the other Party (the "Non-Defaulting Party")
shall be entitled to give written notice in the manner prescribed in Section 5.1 below fo the
Defaulting Party, which notice shall state the nature of the default claimed and make demand that
such default be corrected. The Defaulting Party shall then have (i) 20 days from the date of the
notice within which to correct the default 1P-21-btliTrIQ.....sonably be corrected by the payment of
money, or (ii) 30 days from the date of the notice to cure the default if action other than the
payment of money is reasonably required, or if the non-monetary default cannot reasonably be aspx?id=38550
cured within 30 days, then such longer period as may be reasonably required, provided and so
ions as the cure is promptly commenced within 30 days and thereafter diligently prosecuted to
coMpletion. The Parties agree that due to the nature and scope ofthe obligations under this
Agreement, money damages and remedies at la* may be 'inadequate and that specific;
perfortriance may be appropriate for the enforcement of this AgreeMent. Additionally, if .after .
the applicable notice and cure period set forth abbve, •WREI is in default of its obligation Under
this Agreement to treat the Retention Basins with larvicide as set forth in Section 1.2.2 above,
the County may undertake to cure such default and shall be entitled to reimbursement from the
Assurance for the County's reasonable costs in performing such larvicide treatment. In the event
of any non-performance under this Agreement by WREI, the County may withhold or delay any
permits, approvals, entitlements or improvements on the Property until such time as the non-
performance shall be cured. This Section shall not limit any other rights, remedies, or causes of ,
action „ that either Party may have at law or in equity, including the right of the County to cite the
Property, the record title holder of the Property and any responsible' parties for zoning code
violations that may first occur after the Effective Date, of this Agreement. Any violation that
may occur subsequent to the Effective Date shall be treated as' independent of any Existing
Violations. The existence of subsequent violations shall form no basis:for the County to disavow.
the Settlement set forth in this Agreement, unless said violation is also .a Violation of any
obligation set forth in this Agreement and the violation is not cured within the applicable time
period set forth herein.
QB 1122777.00050\11447561.5
MCR 4 of 16

20110333313
20110296740
3.2. Future Zoning Code Violations. Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 3.1
above, in the event a zoning code violation occurs on the Property after the Effective Date of this
Agreement, WREI shall be entitled to, at a minimum, the following process:
3.2.1. A notice of violation ("Notice of Violation") shall be delivered at the address for
WREI set forth in this Agreement and shall be posted on the Property. All Notices of
Violaiton shall provide WREI not fewer than thirty (30) days to remedy said violation
without any penalty being assessed.
3.2.2. Not sooner than the expiration of the period for compliance set forth in the Notice
• of Violation, WRE1 may be served with a Summons calling WREI to appear before a
Hearing Officer, as set forth in A.R.S. §11-808 B. Said .Summons shall provide no fewer
• than thirty (30) days notice of the hearing date. In the event compliance is achieved before
the hearing date, WRE1 shall be deemed to have complied and no penalty shall be assessed.
3.23. At the hearing, the burden of proving zoning code violations shall fall to the
County. The Hearing Officer shall determine liability in connection with any alleged
violations.
3.2.4. In the event the Hearing Officer fmds that a violation has occurred, WREI shall
have a period of ten (10) days in which to appeal such finding to the Maricopa County Board
of Adjustment. The jurisdiction of the Board of Adjustment is limited to the ability to either
affirm the decision of the Hearing Officer or find that a procedural error occurred and
remand the matter for a new hearing.
3.2.5. If WREI is dissatisfied with the foregoing process, WREI may appeal any decision
of the Board of Adjustment to Superior Court within (30) days of the date of decision by the
Board of Adjustment. Unofficial Document
3.2.6. Nothing contained herein shall he construed as limiting the ability of the County
and WREI to enter into a Compliance Agreement with respect to any and all zoning code
violations.
, 3.3. No Personal Liability. No member, Official or employee of the County shall. be
personally liability to WREI, or any successor or assignee. of WREI: (a) in the event of an
_ default or breach of this Agreement by the County, (b) . for any amount which may become due to
,WREI or its successors or assigns, or (e) pursuant to any obligation of the County under the -
terms- of this Agreement. No officer, director, employee, shareholder, partner or agent of WREI
shall be personally liable to the County (x) in the event of any default or breach . of this
Agreement by WREI, (y) for any amount which may become dud to the County or its successors'
or assigns, or (z) pursuant to any obligation of WREI under the terms of this Agreement.
Article 4. Term.
This Agreement shall become effective as of the date it is _recorded in the Official
Records of Maticopa County, Arizona as set forth in Section 521 below (the "Effective Date").
The term of this Agreement shall begin upon the Effective Date and; unless sooner terminated by
the mutual -consent of the Parties, shall terminate automatically and without the need for any
additional signatures, authorizations or recorded documents, upon the first to occur of: (1) the
Trustee's Sale, if WREI is not the successful bidder at the Trustee's Sale, (2) two (2) years after
the recordation of this Agreement if the Trustee's Sale has not 'occurred within such two-year
period, (3) recordation of a final plat of the Property or any portion thereof (but if any such plat
covers less than all of the Property, then the termination shall apply only to the portion of the
-5-
QEM22777.00050\11447567.8
.MCR 5 of 16

2 0 1 1 0 3 3 3 3 1 3
2 0 1 1 02 9 67 40
Property subject to such plat), or (4) the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date. If the
Parties determine that a longer term is necessary for any reason, the term of this Agreement may
be extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties. Additionally, if the portion of the
Property subject to the Phase IV Plat is developed pursuant to such plat, then this Agreement
shall terminate automatically and without the need for any additional signatures, authorizations
or recorded documents as to any residential lot shown on the Phase IV Plat which has been
individually (and not in "bulk") sold to a bona fide purchaser for value or user and thereupon
such lot shall be released from and no longer be subject to or burdened by the provisions of this
Agxeement.
Article 5. General Terms and Conditions.
5.1. Notices, All notices, filings, consents, approvals and other communications provided for
in or given in connection With this Agreement shall be validly given, filed, made, transmitted or
served if in writing and delivered personally or sent by Registered or Certified United States
mail, postage prepaid, if. to (or to such other addresses as any Party may from time to time CD 0 a
designate in writing and deliver in a like manner): 0
To the County: rn CD
Maricopa County Planning and Development Department 3 fa)
501 W. 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, Arizona 85008 -o
Attn.: Director Co 0
with a copy to: 0 CD
Maricopa County Office If aural Litigation
301 W. Jefferson, 10th 'floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 --a
Attn.: Counsel -- Planning and Development
(0 co
To WREI; cy/
Westem Real Estate Investors, Inc.
do Arizona Business Bank
2600 N, Central Avenue, Suite 2000
Phoenix,. Arizona 85004
Attn.: Mr. Paul Pickett
With a copy to:
Quarles & Brady LLP
One Renaissance Square
Two North, Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Attn.: Stanton & Johnson, Esq.
5.2. Waiver. No delay in exercising any right or remedy shall constitute a waiver of that
right or remedy, and no waiver by the County or WREI of the breach of any covenant of this
Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach of the same or
any other covenant or condition of this Agreement.
-6-
Q131122777.00050111447561.8
MCR 6 of 16

20110333313
2 1111 0 2 96711 0
5.3. Dispute Resolution. In the event that there is any dispute hereunder which the Parties
cannot resolve between themselves, the Parties agree that there shall be a forty-five (45) day
moratorium on litigation during which time the Parties agree to attempt to settle the dispute by
.nonbinding arbitration before commencement of litigation. The mediation shall be held pursuant
to the guidelines of Rule 16.1, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, The matter in dispute shall be
submitted to a mediator mutually selected by the WREI and the County. In the event that the
Parties cannot agree upon the• selection of a mediator within seven (7) days, then the two
mediators requested by the Parties shall select a third mediator, who shall mediate the dispute.
The mediator selected shall have at least five (5) years experience in mediating or arbitrating
disputes relating to property development. The cost of any such mediation shall be divided
equally between the County and - WREI, or in such other fashion as the mediator may order. The
results of the mediation shall be nonbinding on the Parties, and either Party shall be free to
initiate any litigation allowed by this Agreement upon the conclusion of mediation.
5.4, Attorneys' Fees. If any Party brings a lawsuit against any other Party to enforce any of
the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement, or by reason of any breach or default of
this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be paid all reasonable costs and reasonable attorneys'
fees by the other Party, in an amount determined by the court and not the jury.
5,5. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument. The signature pages from one or more counterparts may be removed from such
counterparts and such signature pages all attached to a single instrument so that the signatures of
all Parties may be physically attached to a single document.
5.6. Headings and Recitals. The descriptive headings of this Agreement are inserted for
convenience only and shall not control or affmtt, -,- meaning or construction of any of the
provisions of this Agreement. The Recitals set forth at the beginning of this Agreement are
hereby acknowledged, confirrned to be accurate and incorporated herein.
5.7, Ordinances and Regulations Control. Nothing contained herein, or in the grant of any
future permit or approval, shall supersede the requirements or provisions of any County
ordinances, rules, standards and/or regulations, and/or the rules and regulations of any and all
departments, divisions and agencies with jurisdiction over the Property. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is entered into in settlement of
the Existing Violations and WREI and its successors and assigns shall have the full benefit of
such settlement under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. C.0
5.8. Exhibits. All exhibits attached to this Agreement shall be deemed to have been 0
incorporated in this Agreement by reference with the same force and effect as if fully set forth in
the body of this Agreement. .
5.9. Appointment of Representatives. To further the commitment of the Parties to cooperate CD -
in the progress of the Development, the County and WREI each shall designate and appoint a (0
representative to act as a liaison betw,een the County and its various departments and WREI.
The initial representative for the County shall be Joy Rich, who is the current Director of the
Maricopa Planning and Development Department, and the initial representative for WREI shall
be Paul Pickett or a replacement to be selected by WREI. The representatives shall be available
• at all reasonable times to discuss and review the Parties' performance of their respective
obligations under this Agreement.
-7-
Q81122777.00G50111447561.8
MCR 7 of 16

20110333313
20110296740
5.10. Time Essence and Successors. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
5.11. No Partnership and Third Parties. It is not intended by this Agreement to, and nothing
contained in this Agreement shall, create any partnership, joint venture or other arrangement
between WREI and the County. No term or provision of this Agreement is intended to, or shall
be for the benefit of any person, firm, organization or corporation not a party to this Agreement,
and no such other person, firm, organization or corporation shall have any right or cause of
action under this Agreement.
5.12. Bound. This Agreement shall run with and be binding upon the land. This Agreement
shall be for the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs,
personal representatives, successors and assigns; provided, however, that none of the obligations
hereunder shall be binding upon the purchasers of any platted residential lots from and after the
sale of such lots to individual purchasers in retail sales (i.e., non-bulk sales).
5.13. Assignment. WREI shall have the right, upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the
County, to assign all or a part of its rights or obligations hereunder to any one or more persons or o a
entities acquiring the Property (or any portion thereof) or any financial interest therein; provided
that any such assignee shall agree in writing to he bound by all of the applicable terms and CD
conditions of this Agreement. After any such assignment, WREI shall have no liability under 9
this Agreement as to any assigned and assumed obligation. In the event of a default hereunder 0
with regard to obligations that have been assigned to a purchaser of a portion of the Property (the 0
"Assigned Portion") pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, the County agrees to limit its
remedies for such default to actions against the assignee and the Assigned Portion. In the event ca
any non-performance by WREI or any assignee shall adversely affect portions of the Property
other than the Assigned Portions, the County may withhold or delay any permits, governmental co
approval of entitlements or improvements on iiint 1 portions of the Property until such time CD
as the non-performance shall be cured. In the event of an assignment of all of WREPs rights and
obligations under this Agreement, the Assurances shall be released and replaced by the assignee
within thirty (30) days after such assignment or, if WREI assigns its rights and obligations only
as to an Assigned Portion of the Property, then the Assurances shall be released and
proportionately replaced by WREI and the assignee based on the relative acreage of the Property
then owned by WREI and the assignee within thirty (30) days after such assignment.
5.14. Other Instruments. -Each,Party shall, ,promptly upon the request of the other, have
acknowledged and delivered to the other any and all further instruments and assurances
reasonably request or appropriate to -evidence or give effect to the provisions of this Agreement.
5.15, Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
Parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement. All prior and contemporaneous
agreements, representation and understanding of the Parties, oral or written, are hereby
superseded and merged in this Agreement: .
5.16. Amendments to Agreement No change or addition • shall be made to this Agreement
except by a written amendment executed by the Parties. Within ten (10) days after the execution
of any amendment to this Agreement, such amendment shall be recorded in the Official Records
of Maricopa County, Arizona by and at the expense of the Party requesting the amendment;
provided, however, if this Agreement has not yet been recorded, then the amendment shall be
recorded promptly after this Agreement is recorded, if this Agreement is recorded pursuant to
Section 5.21 below.
QB\122/77.00050111447561.8
MCR 8 of 16

20110333313
20110296740
5.17. Good Standing; Authority. WREI represents and warrants to the County that it is duly
formed and validly existing under the laws of the state of its organization and is authorized to do
business in the state of Arizona. The County represents and warrants to WREI that it is a
political subdivision of the State of Arizona with authority to enter into this Agreement under
applicable state laws. Each Party represents and warrants that the individual executing this
Agreement on its behalf is authorized and empowered to bind the Party on whose behalf each
such individual is signing.
5.18. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable, it
shall be severed from the remainder of this Agreement, which shall otherwise remain in full
force and effect. If a law or court order. prohibits or excuses the County from undertalcing any
contractual commitment to perform any act under this Agreement, this Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect, but the provision requiring the act shall be deemed to permit the County
to act at its discretion, and if the County fails to act, WREI shall be entitled to terminate this
Agreement.
5.19. Governing Law. This Agreement is entered into in Arizona and shall be construed and
interpreted under the laws of Arizona, and the Parties agree that any litigation arising out of or
relating to this Agreement shall take place in Maricopa County, Arizona.
5.20. Interpretation. This Agreement has been negotiated by the County and WREI, and no
Party shall be deemed to have drafted this Agreement for purposes of construing any portion of
this Agreement for or against any Party.
5.21. Recordation. As required under A.R.S. § 11-1101(E), within ten (10) days after the
execution of this Agreement by the Parties, the County shall cause this Agreement to be recorded
in the Official Records of Maricopa County, Arizona. -
Unofficial Cocurnent
5.22. Board of Supervisors. The Parties acknowledge that, notwithstanding any language of
this Agreement, no act, requirement, payment or other agreed upon action to be done or
performed by the County which -would, under any law require formal action, approval, or
concurrence by the Board of Supervisors, will be required to be done or performed by the
County unless and until formal Board of Supervisors action .has been taken and completed. This
Agreement in no way acquiesces to ,or obligates the County perform a legislative act.
5.23. No County or WREI Developnient Representations. Except as specifically set forth in
this Agreement, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to obligate the County or
WREI to complete any part or all of the development of the Property.
5.24. Approval. If any Party is required pursuant to this Agreement to give its prior written
approval, consent or permission, such approval, consent or permission, shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed.
5.25. Force Majeure. If any Party shallbe unable to observe or. perform any covenant or -
condition of this Agreement by reason of "force inajeure," then the failure to observe or perform
such covenant or condition shall not constitute a default under this Agreement so long as such
Party shall use commercially reasonable efforts to remedy the event or condition causing such
inability and such event, or condition- can be cured within a reasonable amount of time. "Force
majeure," as used in this Section, means any condition or event not reasonably within the control
of such party, including without limitation, "acts of God," strikes, lock-outs, or other
disturbances of employer/employee relations; acts of public enemies; orders or restraints of any
kind of government of the United States or• any state thereof or Any of their departments,
-9-
Q13\122777.00050111447561.8
MGR 9 of 16

20110333313
20110296740
agencies, or officials, or of any civil or military authority; insurrection; civil disturbances; riots;
epidemics; landslides; lightning; earthquakes; subsidence; fires; hurricanes; storms; droughts;
floods; arrests, restraints of government and of people; explosions; and partial or entire failure of
5.26. Conflict of Interest. This Agreement is subject to A.R.S. § 38-511, which provides for
cancellation of contracts in certain instances involving conflicts of interest.
5.27. Condition Precedent. Performance of the obligations hereunder by WRE1 shall be
conditioned upon and subject to WRE1 (or•any related entity) obtaining fee title to the Property,
[Remainder of page intentibnally left blank.]
Unofficial Document
=
-10-
QB1122777.00050111447561.8
MCR 10 of 16

20110333313
2uiluz9b / 11U
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the last date set
forth below their respective signatures.
COUNTY:
MARICOPA COUNTY,
a political subdivision of the State of Arizona
By:
Andrew W: Kunasek, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
Date: 12/ 4/11
0331)//
JfflII DOLUMeRt
Attorney for County
STATE OF ARIZONA
)ss.
County of Maricopa
Acknowledged before me this yril day of r-r; , 2011, by Andrew W.
Ktma.sek, the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Mancopa County, Arizona.
My commission expires: 10/3 fl y 727-eai.1
Notary Public CCJ CD
OFFICIAL SEAL
NELLIE R. HERMES
NOTARY PUBLIC - State of Arizona
MARIGOPA COUNTY
My Comm Expires Oct. 30, 2014
QB\122777.00050111447561.8
MCR 11 of 16

20110333313
2L1111)29b /4U
WREI:
WESTERN REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, 1NC.,
a Colorado corporation
By
Narne:74/2. ,o/eViefir
Its: VizE
STATE OF ARIZONA
) SS:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA
http://recorder
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 10°).- day of
2011 , by PiA_LkL PcEcT , the \.! ICE PR %Iep.).-r of
WESTERN REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC., a Colorado corporation, on behalf thereof.
mari
My commission expires: ç j 4..54I8.
Notary Public copa.govicert
E, 14, aC) \
OFFICIAL SEAL.
UnofilcNI Docurnen1 JANICE DAY
NOTARY PUBLIC - Meta of Arizona
MARICOPA COUNTY
My Comm Expires .hino4,2D11 aspx?id=38550
[201
10295740]
12
Pages
-12-
QB1122777.00050111447561 8
Mai 12 of 16

20110333313
20110296740
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
http://recorder.
maricopa.govicert.aspx7id=38550
Unofficial Document
[20110296740]
13
Pages
-13-
QB1122777.00050111447561.8
MCR 13 of 16

2 0 1 1 033 33 1 3
201 1 029674U
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
Parcel No. 1 (Russell Ranch IV)
That colon of the East half of Section 15, Township 2 North, Range 2 West of the Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridiem. Maricopa County, Arizona, described as follows:
COMMENCING at the South quarter of said Section 15;
thenceNorth 00 degrees 09 minutes 53 seconds East along the North-South line of said Section 15, a distance of
487,07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence continuing North 00 degrees 09 minutes 53 seconds East along said mid-Section line, a distance of
2,162.30 feet to the center of said Section 15;
thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 57 seconds East along said mid-Section line, 3 distance of 129,41 feel to
the Southwest corner of Russell Ranch Phase III as recorded In Book 720 of Maps, Page 29, Maricopa County
Records and of the corrective plat of Russell Ranch Phase III as recorded in Book 739 of Maps, Page 46,
Maricopa'County Records;
thence along the SouthertY boundary of &etc! Russell Ranch Ill the following three courses:
North 89 degrees 63 minutes 38 seconds East, 483,55 feet;
Southerly along a non-tangent curve, the center of which bears North 86 degrees 02 minutes 45 seconds West
1,500.00 feet, through a central angle of 13 degrees 46 1I77=="2.`, seconds, an arc distance of 361.44 feet;
North 89 degrees 53 minutes 38 seconds East, 519.22 feet to the Southeast corner of said Russell Ranch Phase
III;
thence Southeasterly along a non-tangent curve also being the Westerly boundary ilne-of Russell Ranch Phase I
as recorded in Book 570 of Maps, Page 2, Maticopo County Records, the center of which bears North 82 degrees
37 minutes 55 seconds East 2,306.00 feet.through a central angle of 08 degrees 19 minutes 44 Seconds, an are
distance of 335.22 feet:
thence South 15 degrees 41 minutes 49 seconds East along said Westerly boundary line a distance of 851.56
feet;
thence continuing along said Westerly boundar y line along a curve concave to the West, having a radius of
1824,00.feet, through a central angle of 15 degrees 40 minutes 49 seconds, an arc distance of 499.18 feet;
thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 00 seconds East continuing along said Westerly boundary line, o distance
of 115.23 feet to the Southwest Corner of Said Russell Ranch Phase I;
thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 00 seconds East along the South boundary of said Russell Ranch Phase i , a
distance of 6.00 feet;
thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 660.00 feet to the South line of said Section
15:
MCR 14 of 16

2 0 1 1 0 33 33 13
2U1lUZ9f) / 4U
EXHIBIT A (Continued)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
thence South 89 degrees 59 mlnutes .00 seconds West along said South line, a distance of 280.24 lest;'
thence North 00 degrees 06 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 504:38 feet;
thence South 89 degrees n minute 38 seconds West, a distance of 820,00 feet;
thence along a curve concave to the Southeast, having a radius of 20.00 feet, through a central angle of 90
degrees 00 minutes OD seconds, an arc distance of 31.42 feet;
thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance at 31.41 fast;
. ,
there South so degrees 53 minutes 38 seconds Wet, a distance of 40,00
thence Northwesterly along a non-tangent curve, the center of which hears South 89 degrees 53 minutes 38
seconds West 5000 feet, through a central angle of 45 degrees 34 minutes 13 seconds, an arc distance of 3e,ey
feet;
thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 137.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described property is also known as:
Lola 115 through 194, inclusive and Tracts A through 0, Inclusive, RUSSELL RANCH PHASE IV, according to
Book 847 of Maps. Page 40, records of Marioopa County, Arizona, and Certificate of Correction recorded In
Document No. 20061146703.
Payed No. 2 (Russell Rauch V)
Unofficlal Docurnal
That portion of the East half of Section 15, Township 2 North, Range 2 West of the Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian, Maricops County, Arizona, described es follows:
BEGINNING at the South quarter corner of Section 15;
thence North 00 degrees Og Minutes 83 seconds East along the North-Southmid-Section line of said Section 16,
a distance of 487.07 feet to the Southwest corner of Russell Ranch IV;
thence North 59 degrees 63 minutes 38 seconds East along the South line of Russell Ranch IV, a distance of
137.17 feet to a curve to' the right
thence Southerly along a non-tangent curve, the canter of which bears North 44 degrees 19 mirages 25 seconds
East, a distance of 60,00 feet, through a central angle of 45 degrees 34 minutes 13 seconds, an arc distance of
39.77 feet . .
thence North 82 degreee 63 Minutes 38 seconds East, a distance Of 40,00 feet;
thence North 00 degrees 06 minutes 22 seconds West, a-distance of 31.41 feet to a curve to tile right;
thence continuing along said Curve concave to the Southeast, having a radius of 20,00 feel, through a central
angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes CO seconds, an arc distance of 31.42 feet;
thence continuing North 89 degrees 63 minutes 38 seconds East along said South line of sold Russell Ranch IV,
a distance of 820,01) feet: -
thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 540.38 feet to a point on the South line of
said Section 15:
thence South 89 degrees 69 minutes 00 seconds West along said South line of Section 15, a distance of
1,034.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,
MCR 15 of 16

20110333313
llnofflobl Document
20110296740
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER
HELEN PURCELL
The foregoing instrument is an
electronically prepared
full, true and correct copy
of the original record in this
office.
Attest: 04/19/2011 04:34:18 PM
By .25fia-Recorder
To Verify this purchase visit
http://recorder.maricopagovicert.aspx ?id=38550
MCR 16 of 16

20110333313
EXHIBIT B
DEPICTION OF THE PROPERTY
Unofficial Document
-14-
QB1122777.00050111447561.8

20110333313
EXHIBIT B
DEPICTION OF THE PROPERTY
liAmMlaliNnumeM tik I I I
RUSSELL RANCH IV
04/15/11
—ta '"""-I
RUSSELL RANCH V

20110333313
EXHIBIT C
DEPICTION OF RETENTION BASINS
Unofficial Document
-15-
QM122777.00050111447561.8

20110333313
EXHIBIT C
DEPICTION OF THE RETENTION BASINS
DRAINAGE
CHANNEL
MCIumenl
RETENTION
BASIN 1
04/15/ 1 1
OVERFLOW
CHANNEL
RETENTION
BASIN 2
RUSSELL RANCH V