12134-CONTRACT-SIGNED BY VENDOR.PDF
Extracted text (via pymupdf_layout)
118952 characters
Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 1 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ DESIGN BID BUILD (DBB) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Office of Procurement Services Serial # 12134-ROQ Contract # 12134-ROQ C-73-13-040-5-02 Project # 0313-13-1061 Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 2 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL -For- DESIGN, BID-BUILD (DBB) PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD THIS AGREEMENT made this _9th__ day of _January__ in the year 2013_. BY AND BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA, hereinafter called the "Owner,” and _Architekton__ hereinafter called the "Design Professional" or “DP.” NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, do covenant and agree as follows: PROJECT NAME: __Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services_______ PROJECT NUMBER: _0313-13-1061_________________________________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _12134-ROQ_________________________________ Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 3 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE # SCOPE OF WORK ..................................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 1: DEFINITIONS ........................................................................ 6 ARTICLE 2: DP SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ............................. 9 ARTICLE 3: SUBCONSULTANTS ........................................................... 20 ARTICLE 4: OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITIES .......................................... 21 ARTICLE 5: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND REVIEW PROCEDURE ... 21 ARTICLE 6: BASIS OF COMPENSATION ............................................... 23 ARTICLE 7: PAYMENTS TO DP ............................................................. 24 ARTICLE 9: PERFORMANCE ................................................................. 27 ARTICLE 10: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS ....................................... 28 ARTICLE 11: ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ............................. 28 ARTICLE 12: SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION .................................. 33 ARTICLE 13: MISCELLANEOUS ............................................................ 33 EXHIBIT ‘A’: HOURLY RATE AND HOURS ............................................ 40 EXHIBIT ‘B ’DP PROPOSAL for SERVICES ............................................ 41 EXHIBIT ‘C’: RECORD DRAWING PROCEDURES ................................ 42 Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 4 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ SCOPE OF WORK Design Professional (“DP”) shall furnish Architectural and Engineering Services (“A/E Services”) for the Project and Contract described above, upon issuance by the Director of Maricopa County Facilities Management Department (“MCFMD”) (“Director”) or Director’s designee of DP’s Authorization(s) to Proceed. DP shall furnish: planning, programming, feasibility studies, Statements of Probable Construction Cost, partial or complete design services, including preparation of bidding and construction documents, construction contract administration and observation, review of Contractor Change Order Requests, issuance of Construction Change Orders, review of Baseline and updated Construction Schedules, review work prepared by other professional consultants and the Contractor, building commissioning, and other miscellaneous A/E Services that may be required and are authorized by Owner. The Director or Director’s designee may issue an Authorization to proceed to encompass entire Basic Services (as defined in Section 2.2 herein) for a project, or for a portion of Basic Services, or for discretionary tasks as specified in Sections 2.3 herein Additional Services or 2.4 herein Reimbursable Services, or any combination thereof. The fees to be paid by Owner for the A/E Services shall be: A lump sum, not to exceed (See Section 6.1 herein). (Exhibit ‘B’). However, DP shall provide Hourly Rates and Hours (by phase and service). (See Section 6.2 herein Exhibit ‘A’) for reference in the event of added services or change orders. The Director or Director’s designee will confer with DP before any Authorization to Proceed is issued to DP to discuss the scope of the A/E Services covered by the forthcoming Authorization, the time to complete the A/E Services and the fee for those A/E Services, provided that, where no agreement is reached as to the fee for a particular Authorization to Proceed, payment for those A/E Services will be made in accordance with Section 6.1. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 5 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ ARTICLE 1: DEFINITIONS 1.1 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Those A/E Services specified in Section 2.3. 1.2 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS: The As-Built Drawings shall consist of a set of drawings which clearly indicate all field changes (modifications, additions and deletions) that were made to the Contract Documents to adapt to field conditions and field changes. Such drawings shall include but not be limited to all new and existing buried and concealed installation of piping, conduit and utility services identified and/or field-surveyed in the course of design through construction. All buried and concealed items both inside and outside the facility shall be accurately located on the As-Built Drawings as to depth, size and material and in relationship to not less than two permanent features such as interior or exterior wall faces. The As-Built Drawings shall be clean and all changes, corrections, and dimensions shall be indicated in a neat and legible manner and fully comply with the format guidelines prescribed in attached Exhibit ‘C. One (1) hard-copy set of the As-Built Drawings shall be submitted to the Owner with submittal of the Record Drawings. See Section 1.26 below for “Record Drawings”, which are a different set of drawings. 1.3 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: The Maricopa County Planning and Development Department, the State Fire Marshal, the State Elevator Inspector and any Arizona municipal corporation within which the Project is situated. 1.4 AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: A document issued by the Director or Director’s designee to DP authorizing the performance of specific professional services, and stating the time for completion and the amount of fee authorized for such services. 1.5 BASIC SERVICES: Those A/E Services defined in Section 2.2. 1.6 CHECK SET: A set of drawings that have been checked for errors and discrepancies between the design disciplines. 1.7 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: The documents prepared by DP and their Subconsultants and referred to in Section 2.2 of this Agreement to be used for permitting and construction of the Project. 1.8 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: An employee of Owner or agent of the Owner assigned by the Director to monitor the construction and design services to be performed under this Agreement and the construction of the Project as a direct representative of Owner. The Director reserves the right, not to assign a Construction Project Manager to the project. In such case the Owner’s Project Manager will assume all Owner responsibilities for the project. 1.9 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: This Agreement, the DP proposal, the Construction Contract for this Project (with its attachments), the Drawings and Project Specifications and Construction Documents and exhibits and documents related thereto or contemplated thereby, as well as all Addenda, Amendments and Change Orders related to each with respect to the Project and all changes to said documents issued by Owner after execution of this Agreement. 1.10 CONTRACT TIME: The time between the date when the Notice to Proceed is issued to the Construction Contractor and Final Completion of the Work. 1.11 CONTRACTOR: An individual, partnership, corporation, association, joint venture, or any combination thereof, which has entered into a contract with Owner for construction of County of Maricopa, Arizona, facilities and all incidents thereto. 1.12 COUNTY MANAGER: The chief executive officer of Owner. 1.13 DAY: Shall mean a calendar day. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 6 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 1.14 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: Design deferred to the Contractor by the DP for completion of the design due to the complexity and associated Code impacts. Typical Deferred Submittals may include Curtain Wall Systems, Stairs, Precast, Fire Alarm, and Fire Protection System. DP shall provide a list of recommended Deferred Submittals to the Owner for approval prior to presenting their proposal for design services under this contract. 1.15 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS: The drawings, outline specifications and other documents to delineate and describe the size and character of the entire Project as to civil, structural, mechanical, plumbing, fire alarm and fire protection, electrical systems, landscaping, construction and finish materials and other items incidental thereto, and as required by the Project Manager. 1.16 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL (“DP”): The individual, partnership, LLC, professional association corporation, association, joint venture, or any combination thereof, of properly registered professional architects and/or engineers, that has entered into the Agreement to provide professional services to Owner. DP is the prime Project professional as defined in the Rules issued by the Arizona Board of Technical Registration. 1.17 DIRECTOR OF THE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT: The Director of the Facilities Management Department of the County of Maricopa, Arizona having the authority and responsibility for management of the specific project(s) to be carried out under this Agreement. From time to time the Director may act through a Director’s designee. 1.18 FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: A complete and accurate set of drawings and specifications advancing the content of the Design Development documents so as to allow the permitting and construction of the Project. 1.19 INSPECTOR: An employee or consultant assigned by the Project Manager or Construction Project Manager to make observations of Work performed by a Contractor. 1.20 MAXIMUM COST LIMIT: The maximum amount budgeted by Maricopa County for the total cost of the construction of the Work on the Project. 1.21 OWNER: The Owner is Maricopa County Facilities Management Department (FMD), the public body which is a party hereto and the entity for which this contract is to be performed. In all respects hereunder, Owner’s performance is pursuant to Owner’s position as Owner of the Project. In the event Owner exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any rules, regulations, codes, laws and ordinances shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to Owner’s authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to Owner as a party to this contract. 1.22 PAYMENT APPLICATION: The certified form submitted by the Contractor requesting payment for construction work to be reviewed by DP and approved by the Construction Project Manager. 1.23 PROJECT: The scope of construction, alteration or repair, and all services and incidents thereto, of a County of Maricopa, Arizona facility as contemplated and budgeted by Owner. 1.24 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: A written document providing the proposed completion date of each Phase of the Project through design, bidding, construction and proposed date of occupancy by Owner. 1.25 PROJECT MANAGER: An employee of Owner or agent of the Owner assigned by the Director to monitor the services to be performed under this Agreement and the construction of the Project as a direct representative of Owner. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 7 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 1.26 RECORD DRAWINGS: Record Drawings are the official record drawings that document what was constructed. The DP shall prepare Record Drawings from the As-Built documents for the Project. The DP shall provide to Owner one (1) set of Record Drawings as a printed, hard-copy full-sized set with one (1) corresponding set of digital media containing the complete Construction Drawings for the Project in AutoCAD complying with the guidelines prescribed in attached Exhibit ‘C’. The resulting image produced on the viewing screen shall include all of the kinds of information that is visible on full-sized originals approved for permit and issued for construction. These provisions apply to all projects conducted at Maricopa County. All electronic media with As-Built or Record Drawings MUST be in AutoCAD of BIM format (consistent with guidelines in attached Exhibit ‘C’) with matching PDF. 1.27 SCHEMATIC DESIGN DOCUMENTS: The drawings and other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of the Project components including the selection of materials, systems, and equipment, as well as initial program drawings and documents that establish and describe the size and character of the Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire alarm and fire protection systems, materials and additional engineering services as deemed necessary by the Owner and DP to produce a complete and accurate set of drawings and specifications for the permitting and construction of the Project. 1.28 SCHEMATIC DESIGN STUDIES: Site and floor plans, elevations, sections and other items as required by the Project Manager and shall show the scale and relationship of the parts and the design concept of the whole. 1.29 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: A summary of the estimated cost of the building(s) including wastewater, storm water, drainage, parking, lighting and landscaping with fixed equipment, construction contingency allowance, escalation factors adjusted to the estimated bid date, movable equipment (if any), contingencies (if any), utility service extensions (if applicable), and a funding allocation evaluation comprised of a brief description of the basis for estimated costs (similar projects) with square foot costs adjusted to bid date, and a preliminary evaluation of the Project and the allocated construction funds in terms of each other. 1.30 SUBCONSULTANT: A person or organization of properly registered professional architects and/or engineers, who has entered into an agreement with DP to furnish professional services for a project or task, described under Basic Services or a task described under Additional Services or Reimbursable Costs. 1.31 SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION: That date on which, as certified in writing by DP, the Work, or a portion thereof designated by the Construction Project Manager is at a level of completion in substantial compliance with the Contract Documents and has satisfied all requirements in the Project Specifications and other Contract Documents such that all conditions of permits and authorized authorities having jurisdiction have been satisfied and Owner or Owner’s designee can enjoy beneficial use and occupy and can use or operate in all respects for its intended purposes. 1.32 WORK: The entire construction or various separately identifiable parts thereof required to be furnished under the Contract Documents. Work is the result of performing services, furnishing labor and furnishing incorporating materials and equipment into the construction, all as required by the Contract Documents. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 8 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ ARTICLE 2: DP SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 SUSTAINABILITY: 2.1.1 The Project shall comply with designated Maricopa County goals for sustainability. The project shall incorporate “green” building practices to achieve the highest efficiency standards reasonable to reduce operating costs via energy savings; improve worker productivity; and reduce potential liability resulting from indoor air quality problems. 2.2 BASIC SERVICES: DP agrees to provide complete professional A/E Services set forth in the five (5) phases of design process enumerated below, including Code-compliant architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical engineering, plumbing, fire protection systems, landscape design and other engineering services normally required for a project of this specific type, hereinafter collectively called "Basic Services," as follows: 2.2.1 Phase I - Programming and Schematic Design: 2.2.1.1 DP shall confer with the Director or the Director’s designee to establish the Program or program verification, consisting of a detailed listing of all functions and spaces together with the square footage of each assignable space, gross square footage, and a description of the relationships between and among the principal programmatic elements. Based upon Owner’s input, DP shall establish a design concept which shall incorporate environmental and visual elements. Design of the Project is to include wastewater, storm water, drainage, parking, lighting and any other design element necessary to complete the facility. 2.2.1.2 DP shall prepare and present, for approval by Owner, a Design Concept and Schematics Report, comprising the Schematic Design Studies, including an identification of any special requirement affecting the Project, a Project Development Schedule and Statement of Probable Construction Cost, All presentations shall be made to FMD and approved prior to any presentations to the end user or stakeholders. This includes changes in scope and cost estimates. Written approval from FMD is required prior to the release of any information to the end user or stakeholders. 2.2.1.2.1 Schematic Design Documents shall consist of but not be limited to site and floor plans, elevations, sections, etc., as required by the Project Manager and the scale of the relationship of the parts and design concept of the Project and shall also include a review of all Building Codes and applicable laws to determine compliance, scheduling and construction budget information. 2.2.1.2.2 Schematic Design Studies shall consist of but not be limited to site and floor plans, elevations, sections, etc. as required by the Project Manager and shall show the scale and relationship of the parts and the design concept of the whole. 2.2.1.2.3 The Project Development Schedule shall define the proposed completion date of each Phase of the Project through design, bidding, construction, and proposed date of occupancy by Owner. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 9 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2.2.1.2.4 Statements of Probable Construction Cost shall include a summary of the estimated cost of the building(s) including fixed equipment, , escalation factors adjusted to the estimated bid date, movable equipment (if any), contingencies (if any), alternates, utility improvement, utility service extensions (if applicable), and any offsite utilities included in the Scope of Work and applicable sales tax. 2.2.1.3 DP shall submit four (4) hard copies, one (1) electronic media set (in PDF format, but generated from AutoCAD files complying with guidelines per Exhibit ‘C’) on disk of all documents required under this Phase I, without additional charge, for approval by Owner. DP shall not proceed with the next Phase II until the documents have been approved by Owner and a written Authorization to Proceed with the next phase of the design has been issued by the Director or Director’s designee. 2.2.1.4 DP shall prepare an energy efficiency study necessary to comply with all applicable mechanical and electrical codes, requirements and standards for Owner and the State of Arizona. The study shall also comply with the Maricopa County Goals for Sustainability. 2.2.2 Phase II - Design Development: 2.2.2.1 Working from the previously approved Schematic Design documents, DP, shall prepare and present, for review and approval by Owner, the Design Development Documents, comprising the drawings, outline specifications and other documents to delineate and describe the size and character of the entire Project as to architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, fire alarm, fire protection, plumbing and electrical systems, landscaping, construction materials and finish materials. DP shall be required to make at least one (1) presentation of the Design Development Documents to Owner. As and if requested by the Project Manager, Subconsultants engaged by DP shall attend this presentation to explain the design concept of their respective systems. All presentations shall be made to FMD and approved prior to any presentations to the end user or stakeholders. This includes changes in scope and cost estimates. Written approval from FMD is required prior to the release of any information to the end user or stakeholders. 2.2.2.2 At this Phase II presentation, DP shall also submit an Updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost. If the Updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the Maximum Cost Limit, appropriate cost or scope reduction recommendations must be included by DP in the recommendation at no cost to Owner. 2.2.2.3 DP shall submit four (4) hard copies, one (1) electronic media set (in PDF format, but generated from AutoCAD files complying with guidelines prescribed in Exhibit ‘C’) on disk of all documents required under this Phase, without additional charge, for approval by Owner, and DP shall not proceed with the next Phase of the design until Owner has approved the documents and a written authorization for the next Phase has been issued. 2.2.2.4 If requested by the Project Manager, DP shall prepare Finish Material Sample boards as necessary to review the color selections of all finish materials with the Project Manager and DP will furnish the approved colors to Owner within a timeframe acceptable to the Project Manager. This shall be done in a timely manner so as to not delay Project progress. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 10 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2.2.3 Phase III - Construction Documents Development: Working from the approved Design Development Documents and in accordance with Owner’s format, DP shall prepare for approval by Owner Construction Documents, setting forth in detail all requirements necessary for the permitting, bidding and construction of the Project. DP is responsible for full compliance of the design and the Construction Documents with all applicable codes of building officials or entities having jurisdiction and shall opine to Owner that the Project can be constructed within the Maximum Cost Limit set by Owner for the Construction Cost. 2.2.3.1 50% Construction Documents Submittal: DP shall make a 50% Construction Documents submittal, for approval by Owner, which submission shall include: 2.2.3.1.1 Four (4) hard copies and one (1) electronic media set of all drawings (AutoCAD complying with guidelines prescribed in Exhibit ‘C’ with matching PDF) and specifications (complying with designated products / materials / systems prescribed by the Owner). 2.2.3.1.2 A complete index of every drawing sheet, to become part of the Construction Documents, including DP's evaluation of the individual percentage completion of each sheet at this stage. 2.2.3.1.3 DP shall, in the preparation of the Project Specifications, use the most recent edition of CSI Standards promulgated by the Construction Specifications Institute and these technical specifications shall not be merely outline specifications as were submitted during the Design Development phase. Specification content shall be coordinated in conjunction with prescribed products / materials / systems of the Owner, as identified during Design Development. 2.2.3.1.4 An updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost, as determined by DP as indicated by time factor, changes in requirements, or general market conditions, and an updated Project Development Schedule. An Authorization to Proceed with the completion of Phase III will not be issued by the Director or Director’s designee if the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the Maximum Cost Limit, unless Owner increases the Maximum Cost Limit or DP and Owner mutually agree on methods of cost reduction sufficient to enable construction of the Project within the funds available. 2.2.3.1.5 DP may also be authorized by Owner to include in the Construction Documents approved additive alternate bid items to permit Owner to award a Construction Contract within the limit of budgeted amount. 2.2.3.2 DP shall not proceed with further design until written approval from the Director or Director’s designee is received on the 50% Construction Documents check set and a Statement of Probable Cost DP shall make all needed changes to the documents and resolve all questions indicated on the documents. The 50% complete Check Set shall be returned to Owner. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 11 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2.2.3.3 At 90% completion of the Construction Document phase, DP shall deliver four (4) hard copies, one (1) electronic media set (AutoCAD complying with guidelines prescribed in Exhibit ‘C’ with matching PDF) on disk of the Construction Documents and complete sets of Project Specifications and other required documents intended for permitting and construction to Owner for distribution to Building Officials or entities for review and approval. Owner will provide final review comments to DP. Owner and the Project Manager will define 90% completion for DP. The Director or the Director’s designee may require that DP furnish a detailed estimate of the cost of construction at this point in the process as a reimbursable expense. DP shall not proceed to the 100% Construction Document Phase until authorized in writing by Owner to do so. 2.2.3.4 100% Construction Documents Submittal: 2.2.3.4.1 Upon 100% completion of the Construction Documents, DP shall submit to Owner four (4) hard copies, one (1) electronic media set (AutoCAD complying with guidelines prescribed in Exhibit ‘C’ with matching PDF) and one (1) electronic BIM model on disk of Check Sets of the drawings, specifications, reports, programs, etc., together with a final, updated Statement of Probable Construction Cost or, when specifically authorized by the Director as a reimbursable expense, a Detailed Estimate of Cost. The Construction Documents 100% submittal shall consist of six (6) full-size sets of drawings, three (3) 11”x17” size set(s) of drawings and six (6) sets of Project Specifications for Owner to review on disk. These sets with resolution of comments from this review incorporated into the documents shall establish completion of the 100% Construction Documents. Once approved by Owner, the 100% Construction Documents shall become the Approved 100% Construction Documents and shall not be altered, modified or revised without Owner’s prior written consent. 2.2.3.4.2 DP shall make all required changes or additions and resolve all questions on the documents. The 100% complete Check Set shall be returned to Owner. Upon final approval by Owner, DP shall furnish one copy of all Drawings and Project Specifications, along with an electronic copy to Owner without additional charge to Owner. 2.2.3.4.3 DP shall be responsible for preparing and filing the documents required for approval by governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and in obtaining certifications of "permit approval" by such reviewing authorities prior to printing of the Bid Documents. DP shall make the original documents available to Owner for reproduction of additional copies as may be required for bid solicitation and/or construction purposes. 2.2.3.4.4 DP expressly warrants that the Drawings and Project Specifications and Construction Documents for the Project have been prepared by DP and the Subconsultants of DP by exercising their professional skills with care and diligence and in a reasonable non-negligent manner consistent with the standard of care of like professionals in Maricopa County, Arizona. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 12 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2.2.3.4.5 DP shall be responsible for the cost of any additional design, studies and reports, field layout testing, construction and administrative and supervision necessary to correct errors and omissions caused by or attributable to DP and for any costs, loss or damages incurred by Owner as a result of any additional design or construction costs caused by such DP errors or omissions that fall outside the applicable standard of care. 2.2.3.4.6 DP agrees it shall be held responsible for the cost of remedial or corrective actions required as a result of DP errors and omissions in the Construction Documents that do not comply with the standard of care. 2.2.4 Phase IV – Public Bidding and Award of Contract: 2.2.4.1 Bid Documents Approvals and Printing: 2.2.4.1.1 Upon receipt of all necessary permit approvals of the Construction Documents, and approval by Owner of the most recent Statement of Probable Construction Cost from DP, DP shall assist Owner in soliciting bids and awarding a construction contract. 2.2.4.1.2 Owner may have the drawings and specifications printed for bid solicitation purposes, either through its open and ongoing agreements with printing firms or as a reimbursable service through DP. 2.2.4.2 Issuance of Solicitation Documents, Addenda and bid opening: 2.2.4.2.1 In addition to fulfilling statutory advertising requirements, Owner shall issue a notice to prospective bidders informing them how to obtain solicitation documents. 2.2.4.2.2 DP shall prepare addenda to the solicitation documents, if any are required, for Owner to issue same to all prospective respondents. No such addendum shall be issued without Owner's approval. 2.2.4.2.3 DP shall be present at the solicitation opening, with Owner's representatives, to assist as needed. 2.2.4.3 Should the lowest responsive, responsible Base Bid received exceed the Maximum Cost Limit, Owner may: 2.2.4.3.1 approve the resulting increase in Project cost and award the contract, or 2.2.4.3.2 reject all responses and re-solicit for the contract within a reasonable time with no change in the Project, or 2.2.4.3.3 in accordance with A.R.S. § 34-104.E, direct DP at no added cost to Owner to revise the Project scope or quality, or both, as approved by Owner, and then re-solicit the contract, or 2.2.4.3.4 Abandon or suspend the Project per Article 12 below. 2.2.5 Phase V – Observation and Administration of the Construction Contract: Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 13 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2.2.5.1 The Construction Phase of the Project will commence with the award of the Construction Contract and will end when final payment is made by Owner. During this period, DP shall observe and provide administration of the Construction Contract only as set forth in the Construction Contract and other Contract Documents and as provided herein. 2.2.5.2 During the Construction Phase, DP shall advise and consult with Owner and shall have authority to act on behalf of Owner only as set forth herein and to the extent provided in the Construction Contract, incorporated by this reference. 2.2.5.3 DP shall visit the site at least weekly and at such times as requested by the Construction Project Manager, and at all key construction events, DP's Subconsultants shall visit the site weekly, to ascertain the progress of the Project and to determine in general if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. On the basis of on-site observations, DP shall endeavor to guard Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work. DP shall notify Owner of any non-compliant work discovered during the site visits. DP will not be required to make extensive inspections or provide continuous daily on- site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work unless otherwise set forth in this Agreement. DP is not responsible for the Contractor’s construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the performance of the Work, nor will DP be held responsible for the Contractor's or Subcontractors', or any of their agents’ or employees’, failure to perform the Work in compliance with the Contract Documents. 2.2.5.4 DP shall furnish Owner with a written report of all observations of the Work made by DP during each visit made to the Project. DP shall keep a log of all non-compliant work and shall keep track of all such issues to resolution. DP shall also state in the log the final resolution action and the date correction was made. DP shall also note the general status and progress of the Work and submit same in a timely manner or more often if requested by the Construction Project Manager. DP shall ascertain that the Contractor is making timely, accurate, and complete notations on its As-Built Drawings as the Work proceeds by reviewing the Contractor’s As-Built Drawings on a monthly basis and providing written confirmation to the Owner. 2.2.5.5 Based on observations at the site and consultation with the Construction Project Manager, DP shall determine the amount due the Contractor in progress payments and shall recommend approval or disapproval of amounts applied for by executing AIA Form G702. This recommendation shall constitute a representation by DP to Owner that, to the best of DP's knowledge, information and belief, the Work has progressed to the point indicated in the pay application and the quality and quantity of the Work is in compliance with the Contract Documents subject to: 2.2.5.5.1 an evaluation of the Work for compliance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion, 2.2.5.5.2 the results of any subsequent tests required by the Contract Documents, 2.2.5.5.3 minor deviations from the Contract Documents correctable prior to Project completion, and Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 14 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2.2.5.5.4 any specific qualifications stated in the Payment Application. 2.2.5.6 If Owner elects to withhold, in whole or in part, any progress payment to Contractor, DP may be requested to assist Owner in preparation of specific written findings about the deficiency in the Work and in calculating the reasonable cost necessary to correct the deficient work and complete same. 2.2.5.7 DP shall be the initial interpreter of the requirements of the Contract Documents and the initial judge of the performance thereunder. DP shall render written interpretations necessary for the proper execution or progress of the Work with reasonable promptness on written request of either Owner or the Contractor. If revisions to the Drawings and/or Project Specifications become necessary, DP shall make a written proposal as to the cost unless the need for revision is attributable to DP. 2.2.5.8 DP shall render written recommendations, within a reasonable time, on all claims, disputes and other issues or matters in question between Owner and the Contractor relating to the execution or progress of the Work or the interpretation of the Contract Documents. The Director or Director’s designee shall make final decision regarding interpretations or disputes related to or arising therefrom. 2.2.5.9 Such interpretations and recommendations of DP shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from, the Contract Documents and shall be in written form with graphics supplementation if helpful. In the capacity of interpreter, DP shall endeavor to secure faithful performance of the Contract by both Owner and the Contractor, and shall not show partiality to either. 2.2.5.10 DP shall have authority to recommend rejection of Work which does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever, in DP's reasonable opinion, it is necessary or advisable to insure compliance with the Contract Documents, DP will recommend special inspection or testing of any Work deemed to be not in compliance with the Contract Documents, whether or not such Work has been fabricated and delivered to the Project, or installed and completed but such inspection or testing may only be authorized by Owner. DP shall provide such normal mechanical, plumbing, electrical, structural, landscape or other related inspection expertise and services as is necessary from time to time to determine compliance with the Construction Contract. 2.2.5.11 DP shall review and return all submittals, shop drawings, samples, deferred submittals and other submissions of the Contractor for conformance with the design concept of the Project and for compliance with the Contract Documents within fourteen (14) days from receipt. 2.2.5.12 DP shall respond to all Requests for Information or Clarification from Contractor or Owner within seven (7) days from receipt and shall do so with graphic supplementation when requested. All reviews are to be conducted in a timely manner so as to not delay progress of the construction. Changes to or substitution of Contract Documents shall not be authorized without the written concurrence of Owner. 2.2.5.13 DP shall issue a Proposal Request (PR) and a Potential Change Order (PCO) for each revision to the contract but only after consulting with and with the agreement of the Construction Project Manager. The DP shall review and make recommendations to the Construction Project Manager on all Change Order Requests submitted by the Contractor prior to responding to the Contractor. DP shall review and negotiate all Change Order Requests submitted by the Contractor and recommend acceptable changes to the Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 15 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ Construction Project Manager for final approval. Upon approval by the Construction Project Manager the DP shall issue a Change Order for the required approvals. DP shall review all Contractor requests for time extensions and make recommendations to the Construction Manager before responding to the Contractor. .DP may issue supplemental instruction or interpretation of the Contract Documents or order minor changes in the Work so long as they involve no change in Contract Time or Contract Price. 2.2.5.14 Upon receipt of the Contractor's Request for Substantial Completion with Contractor’s Punch List attached, DP shall, prior to occupancy by Owner, confirm and recommend to the Owner that the project is substantially complete in accordance with the Contract requirements. Upon Owner written concurrence, DP shall develop a complete, final punch list of any remaining defects and discrepancies in the Work. The punch list shall be created with the Owner’s involvement and include Owner’s comments. The complete punch list shall be attached to the DP Certificate of Substantial Completion. DP shall be responsible for all punch list back-checks and confirmation of full and satisfactory performance before DP recommends to the Owner that a Final Acceptance and final payment be made to the Contractor. 2.2.5.15 For Substantial Completion, DP shall obtain from the Contractor all guarantees, Operation and Maintenance manuals for equipment, releases of claims and such other documents and certificates as may be required by applicable codes, laws, and the Project Specifications, review them for compliance with Contract requirements, and deliver them to Owner if in compliance. 2.2.5.16 DP shall provide assistance in obtaining the Contractor's compliance with the Contract Documents relative to 1) initial instruction of Owner's personnel in the operation and maintenance of any equipment or system, 2) initial start-up and testing, adjusting and balancing of equipment and systems, 4) final clean-up of the Project. 2.2.5.17 During all phases of the Project, DP shall notify Owner in writing of all conflicts between the Plans and Specifications and/or Contract Documents and any laws, codes, ordinances, rules, regulations and restrictions that come to the attention of DP or should have reasonably come to DP’s attention with the exercise of due care. 2.2.5.18 DP shall prepare and submit to Owner weekly and/or monthly reports, as required by the Construction Project Manager, throughout the Construction Phase of the Project. The reports shall provide the current status of activities of DP, Contractor, subcontractors, Consultants, Subconsultants, and others whose activities affect the Project. The reports shall also include a copy of the log on all non-compliant work and all resolution information. 2.2.5.19 For both Basic and Additional Services, DP shall prepare Record Drawings and provide to Owner one (1) printed hard-copy full-size set of Record Drawings, signed and sealed by the DP and the Subconsultants for their respective disciplines, with one (1) corresponding set of digital on computer magnetic media containing the complete drawings for the Project in AutoCAD and in PDF. The image on screen shall include all title blocks, borders, details, and all notes that are visible on the full-sized originals. Each sheet provided shall indicate it is a Record Drawing. DP shall also prepare a simplified version of all approved Egress Plans in the Drawings used in the permit approval process Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 16 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ and provide such to Owner upon request for purposes of installation of evacuation / exiting diagrams in the completed Project. DP acknowledges that the quantity thereof and extent of depicted information may be determined by the Authority Having Jurisdiction over the Project. 2.2.5.20 In connection with Final Acceptance and final payment, DP shall inspect the Work and determine: 2.2.5.20.1 Whether the Contractor has satisfactorily completed or corrected all items on the punch list attached to the Request for Substantial Completion; 2.2.5.20.2 Whether the work complies with i) the Contract Documents, and ii) all applicable laws, building codes or authorities having jurisdiction; 2.2.5.20.3 Whether required inspections by building officials have been completed; and 2.2.5.20.4 In consultation with Owner, whether the Work is finally complete. If the Work is not finally complete, the process as set forth above shall be repeated until such time as the Work is finally completed in compliance with the Contract Documents. DP shall also incorporate As-Built Drawings as defined in Article 1, above, into the Record Drawings prior to Final Acceptance. 2.2.5.21 DP shall assist Owner in conducting a post-construction inspection at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the one-year post-construction warranty period to identify deficiencies and warranty-related problems. DP shall note, prepare and submit to Owner a written report on all faults, deficiencies or warranty problems observed. 2.2.6 Maximum Cost Limit: If at any time during Phases I through V of the Basic Services (or during any Additional Services) the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost submitted by DP exceeds Owner’s Maximum Cost Limit, DP shall, at no additional cost to Owner, revise the Design Documents to bring the Project costs within the Maximum Cost Limit. Such revised Design Documents must be completed by DP within the time period designated in writing by the Project Manager. The Maximum Cost Limit for the Work is not to be changed unless amended by Maricopa County. 2.3 ADDITIONAL SERVICES: 2.3.1 The Additional Services listed below are beyond the scope of the Basic Services as same are defined in this Agreement, and if authorized in advance by an appropriate written directive from the Director or Director’s designee, will be compensated for by lump sum agreed to by Owner under Section 6.1.1.1, below, or at the hourly rate as provided under Section 6.1.2 hereof. 2.3.1.1 Special analyses of Owner’s needs, and special detailed programming requirements for the Project authorized by Director or Director’s designee. 2.3.1.2 Financial feasibility, life cycle costing or other special studies. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 17 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2.3.1.3 If not provided for in Basic Services or in Owner’s own program, planning surveys, site evaluations, or comparative studies of prospective sites as authorized by Director or Director’s designee. 2.3.1.4 Design services relative to future facilities, systems and equipment which are not intended to be constructed as part of the Project. 2.3.1.5 Providing services to investigate existing conditions of facilities or to make measured drawings thereof, after DP has expended an amount of time deemed to be the normal requirement for renovation and alteration projects. 2.3.1.6 Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost consisting of quantity surveys itemizing all material, equipment and labor required for the Project. 2.3.1.7 Excluding all equipment, materials, supplies and related items included in the Construction Contract, design services required for or in connection with the selection of furniture or furnishings or fixtures. 2.3.1.8 Investigation and making detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by Owner. 2.3.1.9 Any additional special professional services (other than the customary architectural, civil, structural, geo-technical, mechanical, plumbing, fire alarm, fire protection, security, electrical engineering and landscape design services) as may be required for the Project, including but not limited to: acoustical, food service, theatrical, electronic, telephone/data, artists and sculptors. 2.3.1.10 The services of one or more full-time Project Field Representatives during construction as deemed appropriate and as approved and authorized in advance by the Project Manager. 2.3.1.11 Extended assistance beyond that provided under Basic Services for the initial start-up, testing, adjusting and balancing of any equipment or system; commissioning; extended training of Owner’s personnel in operation and maintenance of equipment and systems, and consultation during such training; and preparation of operating and maintenance manuals, other than those provided by the Contractor, subcontractor, or equipment manufacturer. 2.3.1.12 A/E Services concerning replacement of any Work damaged or built in non- compliance with the Contract Documents, providing the cause for such non- compliance is determined by Owner to be other than by fault of DP or beyond control of DP. 2.3.1.13 Making major revisions changing the scope of the Project, to Drawings and Project Specifications, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by Owner and are due to causes beyond the control of DP. (Major revisions are defined as those changing the scope and arrangement of spaces and/or scheme and/or any significant portion thereof.) 2.3.1.14 Preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration or legal proceeding, providing, however, that DP cannot testify or give evidence against Owner in any matters during the course of providing services under this Agreement . 2.3.1.15 Providing services after Final Completion and final payment to the Contractor, other than those called for under this Agreement. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 18 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2.3.1.16 Additional Observation and Administration, in the event the time period of Observation of DP under Basic Services exceeds the Contract Time for the Work by more than 15%, and only if the delay in completion of the Work is in the opinion of Owner beyond the control of DP and the Additional Observation and Administration is approved by the Construction Project Manager. 2.3.1.17 Renderings, sketches, models or photographs to further convey the proposed design concept to the Owner. 2.3.1.18 Any other services not otherwise included in this Agreement. 2.3.2 Failure to timely perform any part of requested Additional Services identified in this Agreement shall be a breach of the Agreement and Owner may, in its sole discretion, without liability, contract with others to perform those services and the cost for those services by others incurred by Owner shall be borne by DP, if the DP had agreed to perform those services within the time frame mutually agreed upon when authorized to proceed with them. 2.3.3 DP shall not perform any services not covered by this Agreement and any such services performed by DP without prior written authorization shall be at DP’s own risk and cost. DP hereby agrees that in the absence of written prior authorization, DP’s work will be at its own risk, cost, and expense and DP agrees that, without such prior written authorization, DP will make no claim for compensation for unauthorized services. 2.4 REIMBURSABLE COSTS: Reimbursable Costs are those items that are authorized by Owner in writing for payment in addition to the Basic and Additional Services and consist of actual expenditures (as verified by invoices) made by DP and its Subconsultants in the interest of the progress of Work and in accordance with the County’s Contractor Travel Policy (MM0030) for the following purposes: 2.4.1 Identifiable transportation expenses in connection with the Project to locations outside the Maricopa County area or from locations outside the Maricopa County area will not be reimbursed unless specifically pre-authorized in writing by the Project Manager. 2.4.2 Meals and lodging expenses will not be reimbursed for temporarily relocating DP’s employees from one of DP’s offices to another office if the employee is relocated for more than ten (10) consecutive working days. Lodging will be reimbursed only for room rates equivalent to Federal governmental lodging. 2.4.3 Identifiable communication expenses approved by the Project Manager, long distance telephone, courier and express mail between DP’s various permanent offices. DP’s field office at the Project site is not considered a permanent office. 2.4.4 Cost of printing, reproduction or photography will be paid for by the Owner through a third party printing firm. The DP will be responsible for its own incidental printing related to the project. 2.4.5 Identifiable testing costs approved by Project Manager. 2.4.6 All Permit fees paid to regulatory agencies for approvals directly attributable to the Project. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 19 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2.4.7 Reimbursable Subconsultant expenses are limited to the items described above and on the same basis. 2.4.8 All Reimbursable Costs will be approved by Owner only pursuant to verified invoices, receipts or other acceptable proof of expenditure provided by DP. ARTICLE 3: SUBCONSULTANTS 3.1 REGISTRATION OF SUBCONSULTANTS: All contracts entered into by DP with Subconsultants engaged to provide professional services on the Project must be with registrants with the Arizona Board of Technical Registration. All such contracts with Subconsultants must incorporate all terms and provisions of this Agreement (including those re: Alternative Dispute Resolution) as they relate to the duties and responsibilities of DP on the Project. 3.2 SUBCONSULTANTS' RELATIONS: 3.2.1 All services provided by the Subconsultants shall be pursuant to appropriate written agreements between DP and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of Owner and DP under this Agreement. 3.2.2 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual or business relationship between Owner and the Subconsultants. DP acknowledges that Subconsultants are to perform those professional services under the direction, control and supervision of DP as the prime Project professional. 3.2.3 DP proposes to utilize the following Subconsultants: FIRM NAME CONSULTING SERVICE Dibble Engineering_____ Civil Engineering_________ Moore Swick Partnership Landscape Architects______ BDA Engineers________ Structural Engineering_____ Henderson Engineers___ Mechanical,Electrical,Plumbing,Fire Protection, Green Globes Commissioning, Data/Telecommunications, and Security Systems Engineering. 3.2.4 DP shall not change or replace any Subconsultant without first obtaining prior approval from the Director or Director’s designee in response to a written request stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed by the Director or Director’s designee and, if the request is denied, an explanation will be provided. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 20 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ ARTICLE 4: OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 INFORMATION FURNISHED: Owner, at its expense and insofar as performance under this Agreement may require, shall furnish DP with the following information: 4.1.1 Surveys of building sites, giving boundary dimensions, locations of existing structures and/or trees, the grades and lines of street, pavement, and adjoining properties; the rights, restrictions, easements, boundaries, and topographic data of a building site, and such information as it has relative to sewer, water, gas and electrical services. Information contained in such provided documents will be provided by Owner with no express guarantee for their accuracy or completeness of lack thereof. DP agrees to field- verify the accuracy or completeness of any information provided by the Owner as deemed necessary by the DP to provide Contract Documents meeting expectations set forth under Articles 2 and 3 herein. 4.1.2 Soil borings or test pits information, mechanical, structural, or other tests when deemed necessary by Owner. 4.1.3 If available, drawings representing as-built conditions at the time of original construction will be furnished to DP; however, they are not warranted to represent conditions as of the date of this Agreement. DP must perform field investigations as deemed necessary by the DP and Subconsultants in order to obtain sufficient information to perform services complying with Articles 2 and 3 herein. Investigative services in excess of "Normal Requirements," under normal industry standards, must be authorized in advance. ARTICLE 5: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND REVIEW PROCEDURE 5.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT: 5.1.1 The Director or Director’s designee shall act in behalf of Owner in all matters pertaining to this Agreement, and with the approval of the County Manager, the Director or Director’s designee shall issue all Authorizations to Proceed to DP. The Director or Director’s designee shall approve all invoices for payment to DP upon recommendation of the Project Manager. 5.1.2 Maricopa County Facilities Management Department is the Owner. The Director shall designate a Project Manager and Construction Project Manager to have general responsibility for management of the project through all phases of this Agreement. The Project Manager shall have authority to issue Authorizations to Proceed to DP and meet with DP at periodic intervals throughout the preparation of the Contract Documents to assess the progress of the design and professional services and the Work in accordance with approved schedules. The Project Manager shall also examine documents submitted by DP, including invoices, and shall promptly render decisions and/or recommendations pertaining thereto, to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of DP's work. 5.1.3 If Owner observes or otherwise becomes aware of any faulty or defective work in the Project, or other nonconformance with the Contract Documents during the Construction Phase, Owner shall give prompt notice thereof to DP. 5.2 REVIEW PROCEDURES: Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 21 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ The following procedures shall be followed for review of all submittals required by Article 2 of this Agreement: 5.2.1 DP shall submit programming when called for herein, Schematic Studies and Schematic Documents, Design Development Documents and Construction Documents for review by Owner in accordance with the Project Schedule. 5.2.2 Owner will be required to provide all review comments to DP within fourteen (14) calendar days from receipt of the submittal. 5.2.3 DP shall respond to and incorporate review comments transmitted by Owner. Any budgetary overruns or discrepancies shall be resolved by design and engineering modifications to match or get below the Maximum Cost Limit. 5.2.4 Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, DP shall respond in writing within seven (7) days of receipt of the review comments. Owner will log, transmit and facilitate the exchange of review comments. DP shall also maintain a similar log and make it available to Owner at all times. 5.2.5 Replies to Responses: Owner will reply within seven (7) days to any responses requiring confirmation and will advise DP if any further reconciliation is required. 5.2.6 Resolution of Differences: Owner will schedule a meeting between DP and Owner, to take place within seven (7) days after review comments are issued to DP, in order to resolve all issues between teams. Owner will arrange additional meetings or conference calls as necessary, in order to expedite resolution and avoid impact to the Project Schedule or the Contract Documents. 5.2.7 Punch List and Back-Check Review: Upon notice from the Contractor that the project is substantially complete, the DP shall develop a punch list with assistance from the Construction Project Manager, incorporating all comments into one punch list for issuance with the Certificate of Substantial Completion. The DP will be responsible for all back-checks to the punch list If any comments remain unsatisfied, additional back checks shall be required from DP until all comments have been satisfied. Any costs associated with DP’s preparation of the back-checks shall be DP’s responsibility. 5.2.8 Resolution of all review comments is requisite for completion of any phase of the Design Services. 5.2.9 Any failure of Owner to make a decision within the time limits set forth herein shall not be construed as acquiescence in all or any part of a subsequent DP claim for relief or remedy. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 22 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ ARTICLE 6: BASIS OF COMPENSATION 6.1 FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE: Owner agrees to pay DP, and DP agrees to accept as payment for all of the Basic Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, a Lump Sum Not-to-Exceed Fee mutually agreed upon of $2,674,786.43__ or as set forth on Exhibit ‘B’, DP’s Proposal, based upon hourly rates and hours, which shall be indicated in DP’s proposal and in Exhibit A. 6.1.1 Payments to DP on account of the Lump Sum Fee shall be made on the percentage of the Basic Services completed and approved according to the Phase of the A/E services. 6.1.2 The Lump Sum fee shall include all costs associated with performing the Basic Services including but not limited to attendance at all meetings with Owner staff, Project Manager, Contractor, and Subconsultants necessary to perform all of the Basic Services, as well as travel, lodging, mileage, long distance communications, modeling reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings, Specifications and other documents, data processing, internet services, and photographic production or modeling techniques. 6.1.3 Owner shall have no obligation or liability to pay any fee, expenditure or cost beyond the Lump Sum Compensation agreed to. 6.2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES/REIMBURSABLES FEE: DP may be authorized to perform and for Additional Services described under Section 2.3 and Reimbursable Costs described in 2.4. The proposal for such services will be a negotiated Lump Sum Not-to-Exceed Fee (negotiated by reference to the hourly rates): 6.2.1 Hourly rates shall be as defined pursuant to Exhibit A. 6.2.2 The following principals may be employed on the Project: Joseph M. Salvatore______ Architekton__________ John Kane_____________ Architekton__________ ______________________ ___________________ 6.2.3 Personnel directly engaged on a Project by DP may include architects, engineers, designers, job captains, draftsmen, specification writers, field accountants and manufacturer representatives engaged in consultation, research and design, production of drawings, specifications and related documents construction inspection and other services pertinent to a project during all phases therein. 6.2.4 Any authorized reimbursable services fee shall not include charges for office rent or overhead expenses of any kind, including local telephone and utility charges, office and drafting supplies, depreciation of equipment, professional dues, internet services, subscriptions, etc., reproduction of drawings and specifications, mailing, stenographic, clerical, or other employees time or travel and subsistence not directly related to a project. For all reimbursable services Owner will pay DP the direct cost of the service without a multiplier. Authorized reproductions in excess of sets required at each phase of the work will be a Reimbursable Service. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 23 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 6.2.5 Owner upon recommendation of the Director or Director’s Designee will reimburse DP for authorized Reimbursable Services as verified by appropriate bills, invoices or statements, pursuant to Article 7. 6.3 Absent an Amendment to the Agreement, the aggregate total of Reimbursable Costs under Section 2.03(b) shall not exceed $26,049.79__, without the prior written approval of the Director or Director’s designee. In the event that sum is exceeded, Owner shall have no liability or responsibility for paying any such excess which will be DP’s own cost and expense. ARTICLE 7: PAYMENTS TO DP 7.1 PAYMENT FOR BASIC SERVICES: Payments for Basic Services will be made monthly in proportion to the professional services performed during each Phase of DP services. Said payments shall, in the aggregate, not exceed the percentage of the estimated total Basic Compensation indicated below for each Phase. • 15% upon completion and approval of Phase I. • 35% upon completion and approval of Phase II. • 55% upon submittal and approval of 50% of Phase III. • 75% upon submittal of required renderings and 100% completion and approval of Phase III. • 80% upon 100% completion of Phase IV. • 90% upon completion of and approval of all professional services including Phase V services. • 100% upon final acceptance and final payment to Contractor of all Work relating to this Project subject to audit of all payments to DP by the Director or Director’s designee. • Partial payments, not to exceed 90% in the aggregate, may be made during Phase V, according to the amount paid on account of the Construction Contract. 7.2 PAYMENT FOR ADDITIONAL/REIMBURSABLE SERVICES: 7.2.1 Payment for Additional Services may be requested monthly in proportion to the services performed. When such services are authorized as an hourly rate, DP shall submit for approval by the Director or Director’s designee, a duly certified invoice, giving names, classification, salary rate per hour, hours worked and total charge for all personnel directly engaged on a project or task. To the sum thus obtained, any authorized Reimbursable Services Cost may be added. DP shall attach to the invoice all supporting data for payments made to approved Subconsultants engaged on the Project or task. 7.2.2 In addition to the invoice, DP shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project development and the total estimated fee to completion. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 24 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 7.3 DEDUCTIONS: No deductions shall be made from DP’s compensation on account of liquidated damages assessed against Contractors or other sums withheld from payments to Contractors. ARTICLE 8: INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE 8.1 INDEMNIFICATION: 8.1.1 DP’s Duty to Indemnify and Defend. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the DP shall defend, indemnity and hold harmless the Owner, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials, and employees from and against all claims, damages losses, and expenses, including but not limited to attorney fees, court costs, expert witness fees, and the cost of appellate proceedings, relating to, arising out of, or alleged to have resulted from the negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful acts, errors, omissions or mistakes of the DP, its agents, representatives, employees, or Subcontractors relating to the performance of this Contract. DP’s duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Owner, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials, and employees shall arise in connection with any claim, damage loss or expense that is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease, death or injury to, impairment, or destruction of property, including loss of use resulting therefrom, caused by the referenced acts, errors, omissions or mistakes in the performance of this Contract, including those made by any person for whose acts, errors, omissions or mistakes, the DP may be legally liable. 8.1.2 The amount and type of insurance coverage requirements set forth below will in no way be construed as limiting the scope of the indemnity 8.2 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: DP, at DP’s own expense, shall purchase and maintain the herein stipulated minimum insurance from a company or companies duly licensed by the State of Arizona and possessing a current A.M. Best, Inc., rating of B++. In lieu of State of Arizona licensing, the stipulated insurance may be purchased from a company or companies which are authorized to do business in the State of Arizona, provided that said insurance companies meet the approval of Owner. The format of any insurance policies and forms must be acceptable to Owner. 8.2.1 All insurance required herein shall be maintained in full force and effect until all work or service required to be performed under the terms of the Agreement is satisfactorily completed and formally accepted. Failure to do so may, at the sole discretion of Owner, constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 8.2.2 DP’s insurance shall be primary insurance as respects Owner, and any insurance or self- insurance maintained by Owner shall not contribute to it. 8.2.3 Any failure to comply with the claim reporting provisions of the insurance policies or any breach of an insurance policy warranty shall not affect Owner’s right to coverage afforded under the insurance policies. 8.2.4 The insurance policies may provide coverage that contains deductibles or self-insured retentions. Such deductible and/or self-insured retentions shall not be applicable with respect to the coverage provided to Owner. DP shall be solely responsible for the deductible and/or self-insured retention and Owner, at its option may require DP to secure payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions by a surety bond or an irrevocable and unconditional letter of credit. 8.2.5 Owner reserves the right to request and to receive, within ten (10) working days, certified copies of any or all of the herein required insurance policies and/or endorsements. Owner Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 25 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ shall not be obligated, however, to review such policies and/or endorsements or to advise DP of any deficiencies in such policies and endorsements, and such receipt shall not relieve DP from, or be deemed a waiver of Owner’s right to insist on strict fulfillment of DP’s obligations under this Agreement. 8.2.6 The insurance policies required by this Agreement, except Workers’ Compensation, and Errors and Omissions, shall name Owner, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials and employees as Additional Insureds. 8.2.7 The policies required hereunder, except Workers’ Compensation, and Errors and Omissions, shall contain a waiver of transfer of rights of recovery (subrogation) against Owner, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials and employees for any claims arising out of DP’s work or service. 8.3 REQUIRED COVERAGE: DP is required to procure and maintain the following coverage’s: 8.3.1 Commercial General Liability. Commercial General Liability insurance and, when necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 for each occurrence, $2,000,000 Personal/Advertising Injury, $4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate, and $4,000,000 General Aggregate Limit. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form property damage, and blanket contractual coverage, and shall not contain any provision that would serve to limit third party action over claims. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the CGL limiting the scope of coverage for liability arising from explosion, collapse, or underground property damage. 8.3.2 Automobile Liability. Commercial/Business Automobile Liability insurance and, if necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance with a combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence with respect to any of DP’s owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles assigned to or used in performance of DP’s work or services under this Agreement. 8.3.3 Workers’ Compensation. Workers’ Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by federal and state statutes having jurisdiction of DP’s employees engaged in the performance of the work or services under this Contract; and Employer’s Liability insurance of not less than $1,000,000 for each accident, $1,000,000 disease for each employee, and $1,000,000 disease policy limit. 8.3.4 Errors and Omissions (Professional Liability) Insurance. Errors and Omissions (Professional Liability) insurance and, if necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance, which will insure and provide coverage for errors or omissions or professional liability of DP, with limits of no less than $2,000,000 for each claim. 8.4 COVERAGES: Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Personal & Advertising Injury $4,000,000 General Aggregate $4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Automotive Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 26 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ Workers’ Compensation $1,000,000 Each Accident $1,000,000 Disease for Each Employee $1,000,000 Disease Policy Limit Errors and Omissions $2,000,000 Each Claim 8.5 CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE: Prior to commencing work or services under this Agreement, DP shall furnish Owner with Certificates of Insurance in a form acceptable to Owner, or formal endorsements as required by the Contract in the form provided by Owner, issued by DP’s insurer(s), as evidence that policies providing the required coverage’s, conditions and limits required by this Agreement are in full force and effect. Such certificates shall identify this contract number and title. 8.5.1 In the event any insurance policy(ies) required by this contract is(are) written on a “claims made” basis, coverage shall extend for two years past completion and acceptance of DP’s work or services and as evidenced by annual Certificates of Insurance. 8.5.2 If a policy does expire during the life of the Agreement, a renewal certificate must be sent to Owner fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration date. 8.6 CANCELLATION AND EXPIRATION NOTICE: Insurance required herein shall not expire, be cancelled, or materially changed without thirty (30) days prior written notice to Owner. ARTICLE 9: PERFORMANCE 9.1 PERFORMANCE AND DELEGATION: 9.1.1 DP Services to be performed hereunder shall be performed by DP's own staff, unless otherwise approved in writing by Owner. Said approval shall not be construed as constituting an agreement between Owner and said other person or firm. DP’s services shall be performed in all respects in a manner consistent with that degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by practicing design professionals performing such services in Maricopa County under the same or similar circumstances and conditions and in a reasonable and non-negligent way. 9.1.2 DP agrees, within fourteen (14) days of receipt of a written request from Owner, to promptly remove and replace any personnel employed or retained by DP, or any subconsultants or subcontractors or any personnel of any such subconsultants or subcontractors engaged by DP, to provide and perform services or work pursuant to the requirements of this Agreement, whom Owner shall request in writing to be removed, which request may be made by Owner with or without cause. 9.2 TIME FOR PERFORMANCE: 9.2.1 DP agrees to start all work hereunder upon receipt of an Authorization to Proceed issued by the Director or Director’s designee and to complete each Phase within the time stipulated in the Authorization to Proceed. Time is of the essence with respect to performance of this Agreement. 9.2.2 The Project schedule establishes the critical time limit of DP’s services. DP shall not, except for cause beyond the reasonable control of DP, exceed time limits established by Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 27 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ this Agreement. Any adjustments in the schedule must be approved in writing by Owner and must be requested in writing by DP within ten (10) days after the occurrence upon which DP’s request for adjustment is based. 9.3 NO WAIVER OF PERFORMANCE: The failure of the Owner to insist, in any one or more instances, on the performance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement or to exercise any of its rights hereunder, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of such term, covenant, condition or right with respect to further performance. 9.4 Any failure of Owner to make a decision within the time limits set forth herein shall not be construed as acquiesence in all or any part of a subsequent DP claim for relief or remedy. ARTICLE 10: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 10.1 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: 10.1.1 By execution of this Agreement, DP assigns all copyright ownership and other intellectual property interest in the Design Documents and Construction Documents prepared by DP and further agrees to execute and to cause any Subconsultant to execute any separate assignment agreement necessary to implement such assignment. 10.1.2 The Drawings and Project Specifications as instruments of service are and shall become the property of Owner whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. DP shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of the Drawings and Project Specifications for information and reference in connection with Owner's use and occupancy of the Project. 10.1.3 Submission or distribution of Contract Documents to meet official regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of any of DP's rights. 10.1.4 To the extent allowed by law, DP agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third person, firm or organization, without Owner’s prior written consent, or unless incident to the proper performance of DP’s obligations hereunder, or in the course of judicial or legislative proceedings where such information has been properly subpoenaed, any non-public information concerning the services to be rendered by DP hereunder, and DP shall require all of its employees, agents, and Subconsultants to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. 10.1.5 In the event of future reuse of the Construction Documents by Owner, DP’s name and seal shall be removed and DP shall not be liable to Owner or third parties in their reuse. 10.1.6 DP shall not use, or allow to be used, the Contract Documents, Drawings, Project Specifications and reports of the unique aspects of this Project in any other project without the prior written approval of Owner. DP’s use of standard specifications texts and details are specifically excluded from the provisions of this paragraph. ARTICLE 11: ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 11.1 Scope. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided elsewhere in the Contract, the alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) process provided for herein shall be the exclusive means for resolution of claims or disputes arising under, relating to or touching upon the Contract, the interpretation thereof or the performance or breach by any party thereto, including but not limited to original claims or disputes asserted as cross claims, counterclaims, third party claims or claims Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 28 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ for indemnity or subrogation, in any threatened or ongoing litigation or arbitration with third parties, if such disputes involve parties to contracts containing this ADR provision. 11.2 Neutral Evaluator, Arbitrators. The County will select a Neutral Evaluator to serve as set forth in this ADR process. As needed under § 11.6.2 below, the County and DP shall each select an arbitrator to serve as set forth in this ADR process. Each arbitrator selected shall be a member of the State Bar of the State of Arizona and shall have experience in the field of construction law. All arbitrators, once selected, shall serve as neutral arbitrators, even if they are party-appointed. The County and the DP shall name their respective arbitrators within five (5) calendar days after the declaration of a failure of mediation or the mutual waiver of mediation. 11.3 Discussion and Partnering. When a claim is made or a dispute arises relating to the Contract, senior representatives of the County and the claimant will meet personally within ten (10) days to discuss the claim/dispute and attempt to resolve it. If, after good faith efforts, resolution is not achieved, the claim/dispute (hereafter “dispute”) will proceed to the neutral evaluation process. 11.4 Neutral Evaluation Process. If the parties have been unable to resolve the dispute after discussions and partnering, the following neutral evaluation process shall be used to resolve any such dispute. 11.4.1 Notification of Dispute. The County through its Agent shall promptly notify the Neutral Evaluator in writing of the existence of a dispute within ten days of the County or the DP’s declaring need to commence the neutral evaluation process. 11.4.2 Non-Binding Informal Hearing. The Neutral Evaluator shall schedule a non-binding informal hearing of the matter to be held within ten (10) calendar days from receipt of notification of the existence of a dispute. The Neutral Evaluator may conduct the hearing in such manner as he deems appropriate and shall notify each party of the hearing of its opportunity to present such evidence as they believe will resolve the dispute. The Neutral Evaluator shall notify each party to the dispute that they shall submit a written outline of the issues and evidence intended to be introduced at the hearing and their proposed resolution of the dispute to the Neutral Evaluator before the hearing commences. Potential Arbitrators shall not participate in such informal hearing or proceedings process. The Neutral Evaluator is not bound by the rules of evidence when admitting evidence in the hearing and may limit the length of the hearing, the number of witnesses or any evidence introduced to the extent deemed relevant and efficient. 11.4.3 Non-Binding Decision. The Neutral Evaluator shall render a non-binding written decision as soon as possible, but not later than five (5) calendar days after the hearing concludes. 11.4.4 Further proceedings. In the event that either party declines to accept the Neutral Evaluator’s decision as the resolution of the dispute, the dispute will proceed to mediation. 11.5 Mediation. In the event that a meeting of principals and neutral evaluation have failed, the parties shall engage in mediation (as a condition precedent to arbitration) within fifteen (15) days of a party’s notifying the Neutral Evaluator that the party declines to accept the Neutral Evaluator’s decision as the resolution of the dispute. The mediator shall be chosen by the parties’ agreement. If such agreement is not reached by five (5) days after the neutral evaluator’s receipt of a party’s notification, then the mediator shall be named by the Neutral Evaluator. In the event that mediation fails (or is waived by both parties) then the matter shall proceed to binding arbitration. 11.6 Binding Arbitration Procedure. The following binding arbitration procedure shall serve as the exclusive method to resolve a dispute if any party chooses not to accept the decision of the Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 29 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ Neutral Evaluator and mediation has failed or has been waived. A party requesting binding arbitration shall notify the Neutral Evaluator in writing within seven (7) calendar days of the failure or waiver of mediation of the party’s demand for arbitration. If the Contractor requests arbitration it shall post a cash bond with the Neutral Evaluator in an amount agreed upon by the parties or, in the event of no agreement, the Neutral Evaluator shall establish the amount of the cash bond to defray the cost of the arbitration as set forth in paragraph 11.6.11 and the proceeds from the bond shall be allocated in accordance with paragraph 11.6.13 by the Arbitration Panel. The bond must be in the full amount agreed upon or as established by the Neutral Evaluator to pay the potential cost of the full arbitration proceeding. The bond must be posted with and received by the Neutral Evaluator within five (5) calendar days after the demand for arbitration. 11.6.1 Arbitration Panel and Applicable Law and Rules. Disputes involving less than $200,000 shall be heard by one single arbitrator chosen by agreement of the parties. For disputes in excess of $200,000, the Arbitration Panel shall consist of three arbitrators: the County's appointed arbitrator, the DP's appointed arbitrator and a third arbitrator (or “neutral arbitrator”) who shall be selected by the parties' arbitrators as set forth in Section 11.6.2. The arbitration is to be convened and administered under the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (“RUAA”) (A.R.S. § 12-3001 et seq.) and the American Arbitration Association Construction Rules shall serve as a guideline for proceedings, thus as a supplement to the RUAA. 11.6.2 Selection of Neutral Arbitrator. For disputes in excess of $200,000, the parties’ arbitrators shall choose the Neutral Arbitrator, within ten (10) calendar days of notification of a demand for arbitration having been received by the Neutral Evaluator. The Neutral Arbitrator shall have the same qualifications as those of the arbitrators set forth in paragraph 11.2 above. In the event that the two party selected arbitrators cannot agree on a Neutral Arbitrator as set forth above, the Neutral Arbitrator shall be selected as the Default Neutral Arbitrator. If the County and DP cannot agree on the single arbitrator or upon a Default Neutral Arbitrator, then County and the Contractor shall each submit two names to Judge Barry Schneider (Retired), or his successor as designated by Maricopa County, who shall select one person. The Neutral Arbitrator may submit his invoices for services to the OWNER, and the OWNER shall pay the amounts invoiced (subject to the provisions of paragraph 11.6) unless and until the DP is determined by the Arbitration Panel to be the non-prevailing party and the Arbitration Panel determines per 11.6.11 what party pays such costs. 11.6.3 Expedited Hearing. The parties have structured this procedure with the goal of providing for the prompt, efficient and final resolution of all disputes falling within the purview of this ADR process. To that end, any party can petition the Neutral Evaluator to set an expedited hearing. If the Neutral Evaluator determines that the circumstances justify it, the Neutral Evaluator shall contact the selected single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel and arrange for scheduling of the arbitration at the earliest possible date. In any event, the hearing of any dispute not expedited will commence as soon as practical but in no event later than twenty (20) calendar days after notification of request for arbitration having been received. This deadline can be extended only with the consent of all the parties to the dispute, or by decision of the single arbitrator or the Arbitration Panel upon a showing of emergency circumstances. 11.6.4 Procedure. The single arbitrator or the Arbitration Panel will conduct the hearing in such a manner that will resolve disputes in a prompt, cost efficient manner giving regard to the rights of all parties. Each party shall supply to the single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel a written pre-hearing statement which shall contain a brief statement of the nature of the Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 30 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ claim or defense, a list of witnesses and exhibits, a brief description of the subject matter of the testimony of each witness who will be called to testify, and an estimate as to the length of time that will be required for the arbitration hearing. The single arbitrator or the Arbitration Panel shall review and consider the Neutral Evaluator decision. The single arbitrator or the Chairman shall determine the nature and scope of discovery, if any, and the manner of presentation of relevant evidence consistent with deadlines provided herein, and the parties’ objective that disputes be resolved in a prompt and efficient manner. No discovery may be had of any materials or information for which a privilege is recognized by Arizona law. The single arbitrator or the Chairman upon proper application shall issue such orders as may be necessary and permissible under law to protect confidential, proprietary or sensitive materials or information from public disclosure or other misuse. Any party may make application to the Maricopa County Superior Court to have a protective order entered as may be appropriate to confirm or enforce such orders of the Chairman. 11.6.5 Hearing Days. In order to effectuate parties’ goals, the hearing once commenced, will proceed from working day to working day until concluded, absent a showing of emergency circumstances. 11.6.6 Award. The single arbitrator shall within ten (10) calendar days of the conclusion of a hearing issue a reasoned award. The Arbitration Panel shall, within ten (10) calendar days from the conclusion of any hearing, by majority vote issue its reasoned award. The award shall include an allocation of fees and costs pursuant to 11.06.11 herein. The award is to be in accordance with the Contract and the law of the State of Arizona. 11.6.7 Scope of Award. Regardless of the provisions of the RUAA, the Arbitration Panel shall be without authority to award punitive damages, and any such punitive damage award shall be void. If an award is made against any party in excess of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), exclusive of interest, arbitration fees, costs and attorneys’ fees, it shall be supported by written findings of fact, conclusions of law and a statement as to how damages were calculated. 11.6.8 Jurisdiction. The Arbitration Panel shall not be bound for jurisdictional purposes by the amount asserted in any party’s claim, but shall conduct a preliminary hearing into the question of jurisdiction over the claim as regards its amount upon application of any party at the earliest convenient time, but not later than the commencement of the arbitration hearing. If the dispute is in reality one involving less than $200,000, the arbitration shall continue before the Neutral Arbitrator as a single arbitrator, with the party appointed arbitrators being excused. 11.6.9 Entry of Judgment. As provided in the RUAA, any party can make application to the Maricopa County Superior Court for confirmation of an award, and for entry of judgment on it. 11.6.10 Severance and Joinder. To reduce the possibility of inconsistent adjudications, the Neutral Evaluator or the single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel, may: (i) at the request of any party, join and/or sever parties, and/or claims arising under other contracts containing this ADR provision, and (ii) the Neutral Evaluator, on his own authority, or the single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel may, on its own authority, join or sever parties and/or claims subject to this ADR process as deemed necessary for a just resolution of the dispute, consistent with the parties’ goal of the prompt and efficient resolution of disputes, provided, however, that the A/E, OWNER and Project Professionals shall not be joined as a party to any claim made by a DP. Nothing herein shall create the right by any party to assert claims against another party not germane to the Contract or not recognized Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 31 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ under the substantive law as applicable to the dispute. Neither the Neutral Evaluator nor the single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel is authorized to join to the proceeding parties not in privity with the County. DP cannot be joined to any pending arbitration proceeding, without the Contractor’s express written consent and unless DP is given the opportunity to participate in the selection of the single arbitrator or non-County appointed arbitrator. 11.6.11 Fees and Costs. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs in connection with any informal hearing before the Neutral Evaluator and the mediation. All fees and costs associated with any arbitration before the single panel or Arbitration Panel, including without limitation the Arbitrator fees, and the prevailing party’s reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees and costs, will be paid by the non-prevailing party, except as provided for herein. In the event that DP is the non-prevailing party, all fees and costs as noted above shall first be paid out of the bond posted with the Neutral Evaluator. In no event shall the DP’s obligation to pay fees and costs be limited to the amount of the bond posted herein. In no event shall any Arbitrator’s hourly fees be awarded in an amount in excess of $250 per hour and (i) costs shall not include any travel expenses in excess of mileage at the rate paid by Maricopa County, not to exceed a one way trip of 150 miles, and (ii) all travel expenses, including meals, shall be reimbursed pursuant to the travel policy of Maricopa County in effect at the time of the hearing. The determination of prevailing and non-prevailing parties, and the appropriate allocation of fees and costs, will be included in the award by the single arbitrator or Arbitration Panel. Fees for the Neutral Evaluator shall be paid by County. 11.6.12 Confidentiality. Any proceeding initiated under this ADR provision shall be deemed confidential to the maximum extent allowed by Arizona law and, except for disclosures to a party’s attorneys or accountants, no party shall make any disclosure related to the disputed matter or to the outcome of any proceeding except to the extent required by law, or to seek interim equitable relief, or to enforce an agreement reached by the parties or an award made hereunder. This provision does not affect the County’s right to inform the County Supervisors of the resolution of the dispute. 11.6.13 Equitable Litigation. Notwithstanding any other provision of ADR to the contrary, any party can petition the Maricopa County Superior Court for interim equitable relief as may become necessary to preserve the status quo and prevent immediate and irreparable harm to a party or to the Project pending resolution of a dispute pursuant to ADR provided herein. No court may order any permanent injunctive relief except as may be necessary to enforce an order entered by the Arbitration Panel. The fees and costs incurred in connection with any such equitable proceeding shall be determined and assessed in ADR. 11.6.14 Change Order. Any award in favor of the DP against the County or in favor of the County against the DP shall be reduced to a Change Order and executed by the parties in accordance with the award and the provisions of the Contract. 11.6.15 Merger and Bar. Any claim asserted pursuant to this ADR process shall be deemed to include all claims, demands, and requests for compensation for costs and losses or other relief, including the extension of the Contract performance period which reasonably should or could have been brought against any party that was or could have been brought into this ADR process, with respect to the subject claim. The Arbitration Panel shall apply legal principles commonly known as merger and bar to deny any claim or claims against any party regarding which claim or claims recovery has been sought or should have been sought in a previously adjudicated claim for an alleged cost, loss, breach, error, or omission. 11.7 Inclusion in Other Contracts. The DP shall cooperate with the County in efforts to include this ADR provision in all other Project contracts. Subject to DP’s reasonable agreement, the Contractor agrees that any modification to this ADR provision that is included in the construction or other contracts shall also apply to the DP. It is the intent of the parties that any changes to this Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 32 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ ADR provision in later contracts will be evolutionary and designed to incorporate the terms of this ADR provision without material changes to the substance or procedure of this ADR provision. ARTICLE 12: SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION 12.1 PROJECT SUSPENSION: Owner may suspend the Project and DP’s services without cause but if the Project is suspended for more than one-hundred eighty (180) days, DP shall be paid for all Basic Services and Reimbursables that have been authorized by an Authorization to Proceed and that were performed by DP and accepted by Owner prior to the date of such suspension. If the Project is resumed after having been suspended for 180 days, DP’s further compensation shall be subject to renegotiation. 12.2 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT: 12.2.1 Owner has the right to terminate this Agreement for its convenience upon seven (7) days written notice to DP. Upon such termination, all charts, sketches, studies, drawings, models and other documents related to services performed under this Agreement, whether finished or not, shall be turned over to Owner within ten (10) days of notice of termination provided that DP has been paid in full for services rendered and approved by Owner as of the date of termination and reasonable termination costs supported by documentation. 12.2.2 Owner has the right to terminate this Agreement for default upon seven (7) days written notice stating the grounds for default or material breach. If DP has not cured the default or breach to the satisfaction of Owner, Owner shall receive ownership of all design documents upon request of Owner and Owner has the right to use, renovate and to make derivative works of the design documents in order to complete the Project. 12.2.3 Termination, for whatever cause or on whatever basis, shall not result in DP’s being entitled to claim any lost profits as a result of the termination. ARTICLE 13: MISCELLANEOUS 13.1 MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS: DP will maintain and require Subconsultant to retain adequate records and supporting documentation which concern or reflect its services hereunder. The records and documentation will be retained by DP for a minimum of six (6) years from the date of termination of this Agreement or the date the Project is completed, whichever is later. Owner, or any duly authorized agents or representatives of Owner, shall have the right to audit, inspect, and copy all such records and documentation as often as they deem necessary during the period of this Agreement and during the six (6) year period noted above. Refusal of DP to comply with the provisions of this section shall be grounds for termination for cause of this Agreement by Owner. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 33 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 13.2 CANCELLATION: Owner may cancel this Agreement without penalty or further obligation under A.R.S. § 38-511 if any person significantly involved with this Agreement on behalf of Owner is or becomes a consultant to DP or a Subconsultant with respect to the subject matter of the Agreement or an employee of DP does so. 13.3 PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS: All payment obligations of Owner are conditioned on the availability of funds which are approved and allocated for such obligation. If funds are not allocated and available for continuation of DP’s services, this Agreement may be terminated or suspended at the end of the time period for which funds are available. No liability or penalty shall accrue or be attributable to Owner in the event it becomes necessary to exercise rights under this provision. 13.4 NON-DEFINED TERMS: If not specifically defined herein, terms, words and phrases will have their ordinary and common meaning and they, together with abbreviations, shall be interpreted consistent with the design professional industry standards and technical and trade meanings. 13.5 NON-WAIVER PROVISIONS: The failure of the Owner to insist, in any one or more instances, on the performance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of the Agreement, or to exercise any of its rights hereunder, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of such terms, covenant, conditions or right with respect to further performance. 13.6 NO HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OR PRODUCTS: DP shall use reasonable care not to specify for use in the Project any product known by DP to contain hazardous substances as defined in 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq. unless no reasonable alternative is available and in that case Owner consent to sue shall first be obtained. 13.7 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION: DP shall immediately notify Owner both verbally and in writing of the presence of and location of any environmental contamination of the site which it becomes aware of or reasonably should become aware, including, but not limited to, hazardous substances and petroleum releases. 13.8 ADA REQUIREMENTS: The Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) is applicable to the Project. DP will use its skill and training as a design professional and exercise the applicable standard of care to design the Project in compliance with ADA requirements. 13.9 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The performance of this Agreement shall not be transferred, pledged, sold, delegated or assigned, in whole or in part, by DP without the written consent of Owner. DP and Owner each binds one another, their partners, successors, legal representatives and authorized assigns to the other party of this Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 34 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 13.10 TRUTH-IN-NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE: In compliance with DP’s Competitive Negotiation Act, for any Authorization to Proceed for a project to be compensated under the Lump Sum method DP shall certify that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation are accurate, complete, and current at the time of said Authorization to Proceed. The original Project price and any addition thereto will be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which Owner determines the project price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete or noncurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such price adjustments will be made within one (1) year following the end of the Project. 13.11 NOTICES: Whenever either party desires to give notice unto the other, such notice must be in writing, sent by registered United States mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the party for whom it is intended at the place last specified; and the place for giving of notice shall remain such until it shall have been changed by written notice in compliance with the provisions of this paragraph. For the present, the parties designate the following as the respective places for giving of notice: FOR OWNER: Director, Maricopa County Facilities Management Department 401 W. Jefferson Street Phoenix, Arizona 85003 FOR DP: Joseph M. Salvatore, AIA, LEED AP, Principal Architekton 464 S. Farmer Ave, Suite 101 Tempe, AZ 85281 13.12 SEVERABILITY: If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement (or the application thereof to any circumstance or person) shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remaining terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby; and each remaining term, covenant, condition and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law unless the enforcement of the remaining terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement would prevent the accomplishment of the original intent of the agreement between the parties. 13.13 SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS: All terms, conditions, covenants and obligations of Owner and DP hereunder shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement as necessary and appropriate for such parties to fulfill their obligations that accrued during the Term of this Agreement. 13.14 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between Owner and DP and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may not be amended, changed, modified, or otherwise altered in any respect, at any time after the execution hereof, except by a written document executed with the same formality and equal dignity herewith. Waiver by either party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach of any provision of this Agreement. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 35 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 13.15 NO CONTINGENT FEE: DP (or registered surveyor and mapper or professional engineer, as applicable) warrants that he or she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for DP (or registered surveyor and mapper, or professional engineer, as applicable) to solicit or secure this Agreement and that he or she has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for DP (or registered surveyor and mapper or professional engineer, as applicable) any fee, commission, percentage, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this provision, Owner shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without liability and, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift or consideration. 13.16 APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE OF LITIGATION: This Agreement shall be enforced, interpreted, and construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Arizona including the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (A.R.S. §. 12- 3001 et seq.), which is applicable hereto. Any suit or action brought by any party concerning this Agreement, or arising out of this Agreement, shall be brought in Maricopa County, Arizona. 13.17 INTERPRETATION: The language of this Agreement has been agreed to by both parties to express their mutual intent and no rule of strict construction shall be applied against either party hereto. The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. All personal pronouns used in this Agreement shall include the other gender, and the singular shall include the plural, and vice versa, unless the context otherwise requires. Terms such as “herein,” “hereof,” “hereunder,” and “hereinafter” refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular sentence, paragraph, or section where they appear, unless the context otherwise requires. Whenever reference is made to a Section or Article of this Agreement, such reference is to the Section or Article as a whole, including all of the subsections of such Section, unless the reference is made to a particular subsection or subparagraph of such Section or Article. 13.18 PRIORITY OF PROVISIONS: If there is a conflict or inconsistency between any term, statement, requirement, or provision of any exhibit attached hereto, any document or events referred to herein, or any document incorporated into this Agreement by reference and a term, statement, requirement, or provision of this Agreement, the term, statement, requirement, or provision contained in this Agreement shall prevail and be given effect. 13.19 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: DP shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, rules, regulations and resolutions in performing its duties, responsibilities and obligations related to this Agreement. 13.20 PRIOR AGREEMENTS: This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 36 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ that there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless set forth in writing. 13.21 LEGAL WORKER REQUIREMENTS: As required by A.R.S. § 41-4401, OWNER is prohibited after September 30, 2008 from awarding a contract to any service or construction contractor who fails, or whose subcontractors fail, to comply with A.R.S. § 23-214-A. DP warrants that it complies fully with all federal immigration laws and regulations that relate to its employees, that it shall verify, through the employment verification pilot program as jointly administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration or any of its successor programs, the employment eligibility of each employee hired after December 31, 2007, and that it shall require its subcontractors and sub-subcontractors to provide the same warranties to DP. DP acknowledges that a breach of this warranty by DP or by any subcontractor or sub-subcontractor under this Agreement shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement, and is grounds for penalties, including termination of this Agreement, by Owner. Owner retains the right to inspect the records of any DP, subcontractor and sub-subcontractor employee who performs work under this Agreement, and to conduct random verification of the employment records of DP and any subcontractor and sub-subcontractor who works on this Agreement, to ensure that DP and each subcontractor and sub-subcontractor is complying with the warranties set forth above. DP shall be responsible for all costs associated with compliance with this requirement. 13.22 INFLUENCE: As prescribed in MC1-1202 of the Maricopa County Procurement Code, any effort to influence an employee or agent to breach the Maricopa County Ethical Code of Conduct or any ethical conduct, may be grounds for Disbarment or Suspension under MC1-902. An attempt to influence includes, but is not limited to: 13.22.1 A person offering or providing a gratuity, gift, tip, present, donation, money, entertainment or educational passes or tickets, or any type valuable contribution or subsidy, 13.22.2 That is offered or given with the intent to influence a decision, obtain a contract, garner favorable treatment, or gain favorable consideration of any kind. 13.23 NON-DISCRIMINATION: CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all provisions and requirements of Arizona Executive Order 2009-09 including flow down of all provisions and requirements to any subcontractors. Executive Order 2009-09 supersedes Executive order 99-4 and amends Executive order 75-5 and may be viewed and downloaded at the Governor of the State of Arizona’s website http://www.azgovernor.gov/dms/upload/EO_2009_09.pdf which is hereby incorporated into this contract as if set forth in full herein. During the performance of this contract, CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate against any employee, client or any or any other individual in any way because of that person’s age, race, creed, color, religion, sex, disability or national origin. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 37 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 38 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ WHEN DP IS AN INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP ATTEST Witness:______________________________ ____________________________ Legal name of Partnership Witness:______________________________ By: _________________________ ____________________________ Legal name (Title, if any) WHEN DP IS A JOINT VENTURE ____________________________________ _____________________________ Legal name of firm Legal name firm By: ________________________________ By:_________________________ Signature Signature ___________________________________ _____________________________ Legal name and title Legal name and title ATTEST __________________________________ _____________________________ Witness Witness __________________________________ _____________________________ Witness Witness Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 39 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ EXHIBIT ‘A’: HOURLY RATE AND HOURS Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 40 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ EXHIBIT ‘B ’DP PROPOSAL for SERVICES Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 41 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ EXHIBIT ‘C’: Record Drawing Procedures Introduction These guidelines are issued to promote the development of electronic drawings suitable for use in the Maricopa County Facilities Management Department CAD environment. Consistency and compatibility with existing Maricopa County documents can only be achieved when these standards are strictly adhered to. Electronic drawings produced and submitted in accordance with these standards have significantly greater value to Maricopa County. Design Professionals (DP), their Subconsultants, and Contractors delivering documentation to Maricopa County must ensure these standards are reviewed, understood and followed by those people responsible for preparing electronic drawings. Renovations and Space Change Projects Requirements For typical Renovation and Space Planning projects, the DP is responsible for submitting a complete set of Construction Documents (CDs) to Maricopa County prior to the beginning of construction. Upon completion of construction, Contractors are responsible for submitting complete As-Built documentation (per definitions included in the Agreement Between The County of Maricopa, Arizona and Design Professional) to the Owner (in both electronic and hardcopy formats) and DP is responsible for submitting the Record Drawings to the Owner based on this As-Built documentation. Construction Documents and Record Drawings submitted to the Owner need to adhere the criteria outlined in this document. All “DWG” files and AutoCAD drawing entities submitted at the end of a project must be able to be manipulated using standard AutoCAD drafting procedures. Non-compliance with this policy may result in the rejection of AutoCAD files submitted at project closeout, in addition to delayed rendering of final project payment. “DXF” files will not be accepted at project closeout as a substitution for “DWG” AutoCAD file deliverables. Projects using Building Information Modeling (BIM) software are still required to submit “DWG” formats for their projects. Electronic File Format CAD drawings must be submitted in full compliance with AutoCAD software 2007 drawing file format (file extension = .DWG). All Construction and Record Document project drawings must be submitted to Maricopa County Facilities Management Department in all file formats listed below; other formats are not acceptable without the prior consent of Maricopa County Facilities Management Department. • AutoCAD® 2007 or higher – DWG format only. • Adobe® PDF version 6.0 or higher. Scale, Units, Coordinate System and Orientation AutoCAD drawings should be drafted at full scale in architectural or engineering units, such that one drawing unit equals one inch. The User Coordinate System (UCS) for all AutoCAD drawings should be set to “World”. Tolerances When projects require creation of new AutoCAD floor plans from field measurements, exterior building dimensions should reconcile to within one (1) inch of actual building dimensions as measured in the field. Interior building dimensions must reconcile to within half (1/2) inch of actual field dimensions. However, individual project requirements may vary. Please confirm requirements with the Project Manager designated by Maricopa County. Blocks The following rules must be employed when handling block entities: 1. All entities within a block must be created on layer 0. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 42 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ 2. Drawing entities translated into AutoCAD blocks from non-AutoCAD systems must revert to layer 0 when exploded within AutoCAD. Policy on External Reference Files (XREFs) Maricopa County will not accept the submission of any AutoCAD drawing deliverable which contains unbound references to external source drawing files. All externally referenced data sources that were used during the AutoCAD drawing production phase should be incorporated as a block within a single drawing file, including the title block and all identifying information visible in the printed image, upon project completion and prior to submission to Maricopa County. Layers contained in XREF’s inserted as blocks should conform to Maricopa County guidelines. The resulting self-contained drawing file is an acceptable deliverable to Maricopa County. Owner Supplied CAD Files Prior to commencement of design and construction services, Maricopa County will provide past Record Drawings in AutoCAD per the Contract Agreement that can be used as the background for space documentation projects. These have been generated using a variety of methods and may require field verification. When no pre-existing Record Drawings in AutoCAD are available, consultants will be required to produce drawings entirely from field measurements. AutoCAD files are transmitted for the convenience and expediency of the DP, their Subconsultants and the Contractor but bear no implicit or explicit guarantee of accuracy, reliability or correctness”. It is recommended to all recipients of Owner- supplied drawing files to perform their own verifications as necessary to develop drawings for each phase of the project. Layers for CAD Files All AutoCAD Files shall include but not be limited to the following building features that define the physical boundaries necessary to define space, such as: 1) exterior walls; 2) vertical elevations & sections; 3) details; 4) schedules; 5) doors; 6) glazing; 7) elevator shafts; 8) stair wells and other changes in floor elevation; 9) built-in furniture and/or modular systems. The DP, their Subconsultants and the Contractor shall adhere to these layer standards as much as possible, although additional layers, conforming to standard formats, may be necessary, while some layers may not be applicable to every space documentation project (furniture, roof lines, etc.). AutoCAD layers should be named in accordance with the latest U.S. National CAD Standard (NCS) which can be obtained from the National Institute of Building Sciences. Custom layers added by Maricopa County begin with MC-. The specific name of custom layers may vary slightly by Maricopa County owner. AIA CAD Layer Guidelines See U.S. National CAD Standard Version 3 (attached). USE OF BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM) Although projects may utilize Building Information Modeling (BIM) for conveying three-dimensional design, two-dimensional deliverables are still required as outlined in this guideline and as specified in Maricopa County Agreements with the DP, their Subconsultants and Contractors. BIM Execution Plan Projects utilizing BIM are required to provide a BIM Execution Plan to document modeling practices. This document declares what is being modeled, the accuracy of the models, the intent of the models, and how project teams work within the models. BIM Standards Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 43 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ Modeling practices and standards should be declared and agreed upon in the Project’s BIM Execution Plan. BIM Models and Deliverables Models turned over to Maricopa County as a deliverable must meet the requirements of the agreed upon BIM Execution Plan. Use of Revit Models are to be created in the most current version of Autodesk Revit. Modeling practices are to be declared in the project’s BIM Execution Plan. Southwest Justice Courts Architectural Services Page | 44 DBB Professional Services Contract Serial # 12134-ROQ