060914IFMA.DOC

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014 Board Members
Meeting Scheduled Start Time: 9:30 AM Denny Barney, Chairman, District 1
Steve Chucri, Vice Chairman, District 2
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Andrew Kunasek, District 3
Maricopa County, Arizona Clint Hickman, District 4
(and the Boards of Directors of the Flood Control District, Marie Lopez Rogers, District 5
Library District, Stadium District, Improvement Districts,
and/or Board of Deposit)
County Manager
Tom Manos
"The mission of Maricopa County is to Clerk of the Board
provide regional leadership and fiscally Fran McCarroll
responsible, necessary public services
to its residents so they can enjoy living
in healthy and safe communities.” Meeting Location
Supervisors' Conference Room
301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
The Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in Informal Session at 9:30
AM on Monday, June 9, 2014, in the Sullivan Conference Room, 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor, Phoenix,
AZ 85003, with the following members present: Denny Barney, Chairman, District 1; Steve Chucri, Vice
Chairman, District 2 (via telephone); Andrew Kunasek, District 3; Clint Hickman, District 4; Marie Lopez
Rogers, District 5. Also present: Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board; Tom Manos, County Manager;
Michelle Wood, Legal Counsel; and Maria Armstrong, Minutes Coordinator.
1. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Vote to convene in Executive Session to consider items on the Executive Agenda dated June 09,
2014, for Board of Supervisors and relevant Special Districts pursuant to statutory authority listed
for each item.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Kunasek, seconded by Supervisor Hickman
Ayes: Barney, Chucri, Kunasek, Hickman, Rogers
RECESS/RECONVENE
After discussion on item #1 on the Executive Session agenda Chairman Barney recessed the Executive
Session and reconvened in Open Session.
OPEN SESSION
PRESENTATION AND ACTION
Environmental Services
2. PRESENTATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE AD HOC TASK FORCE
COMMITTEE FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES DEPARTMENT ON PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS
Presentation of the final report and recommendations of the Ad Hoc Task Force focused on the
division that oversees programs related to food safety processes and regulations. At the
conclusion of the presentation, accept the final report in whole or in part. Actions related to any

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 2 of 13
recommendations that may require funding fee changes, or ordinance amendments will be
brought back to the Board for review and consideration.
John Kolman, Director, Environmental Services
Scott Friedman, Chairman of Cutting Edge Subcommittee
Josh Hebert, Chairman of the Standardization and Consistency Subcommittee
Skip Chase, Chairman of the Plan Review Subcommittee DID NOT ATTEND
(C-88-14-014-P-00)
Supervisor Chucri declared a conflict of interest and then disconnected
Tom Manos, County Manager, stated that the County wants to be efficient and give
outstanding services. He said that as part of that process each of the regulatory departments
have given feedback from stakeholders on how the County can become a better business
partner. He stated that Planning and Development was the first to give 26 recommendations
and most of them have already been implemented. This review process is unique because
stakeholders are engaged in the process. He informed the Members of the following: the
goal is to get through each of the regulatory departments within a year; Flood Control process
is under way; Waste Management is wrapping up the process; and Environmental Services is
working on the public part of the process for implementation.
Chairman Barney thanked Mr. Kolman and the stakeholders who have invested a significant
amount of time in the process.
John Kolman, Director of Environmental Services stated that the process was very successful
and from the concerns raised at the initial Kick-Off Meeting on March 4, 2014, the following
three (3) subcommittees were formed:
1. Cutting Edge – To expand and improve understanding of the program.
2. Standardization & Consistency – To improve processes and communication.
3. Plan Review – To address Minor vs. Major remodels and service delivery for changes in
ownership. A total of 20 recommendations were developed.
Scott Friedman, Cutting Edge Subcommittee Chairman, presented the following
recommendations and proposed actions:
Recommendation 1—to require new and current owners or a local corporate representative
to attend the Division’s 90-minute Active Managerial Control Class within a specified period
time after application.
Proposed Action(s) & Supporting Info:
•Authorize staff to initiate an amendment to the Maricopa County Environmental Health Code.
•The ‘specified period’ would be determined through the stakeholder process of the
Enhanced Regulatory Outreach Program (EROP).
•The program has been shown to have reduced violations with less time spent on each
inspection.
•There needs to be a better understanding of the program and active managerial control in
the industry.
•The class serves as a platform for operators to become a high performing member of the
Cutting Edge Program.
Chairman Barney asked if the participation in the class is currently an elective. Mr. Friedman
responded that it is.

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 3 of 13
Chairman Barney said that he likes the idea and the content certainly helps people. He is
concerned about mandating individuals to do this. He asked if there was another way to do
that with a fee waiver or abatement if they attend the class.
Mr. Friedman responded that there was discussion of a fee incentive and there was a lot of
discussion on mandating the class. He stated that it would help with educating individuals
and eliminate the stresses associated with the Health Department visiting a business. He
said that the purpose of the class is to be an educational tool so the business owners are
more engaged for a better outcome.
Chairman Barney stated that many operators will see the value in the class and consumers
will appreciate the consistency and setting of expectation. He is concerned that mandating
the class it will not be looked at as an inspiration to be more effective.
Recommendation 2—to form a committee of stakeholders to develop a comprehensive
marketing plan for the Cutting Edge Program for long-range, high level promotion to drive
public awareness.
Proposed Action(s) & Supporting Info:
•Identification of resources needed for implementation is key.
•Greater promotion will drive awareness and make the program consumer driven.
•Patrons asking owners / operators if they are part of the program will encourage membership
in the program.
Mr. Friedman explained that part of this is customers being driven to businesses that are a
part of the Cutting Edge Program. He said that the businesses will then want to be involved
in the program as well.
Supervisor Hickman questioned how franchises or multi-restaurant owners are involved.
Mr. Friedman responded that one individual is chosen to be a part of the process for the
franchise or multi restaurants and would pass on the content to the rest of the organization.
Chairman Barney said that he likes getting businesses and consumers excited about the
program but still questions the regulatory standpoint of mandating the class as part of the
program. He said that by mandating the program he is afraid that efficiency will go down and
those that have gone through the program voluntarily see the value while those that are
mandated may not.
Mr. Friedman said that the combination of all the recommendations would benefit and help
everyone. He named several benefits for business owners for being a part of the program
that far outweigh the recommendation being mandated. He believes that consumers will start
to question businesses if they are not a part of the program.
Supervisor Hickman agreed with Chairman Barney on the mandate of recommendation 1 and
stated that mandating recommendation that could be done correctly and should be viewed as
an enhancement.
Recommendation 3—to improve and advance the understanding of the program to the
industry through increased communication via targeted informational emails, discussions,
newsletters, and presentations by staff to various industry associations.

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 4 of 13
Proposed Action(s) & Supporting Info:
•Information Technology support will be required for enhanced, targeted electronic
distribution.
•Staff to prepare a Scope of Work to determine cost of Information Technology solution(s).
•Staff to develop a list of associations to contact to present program information.
Mr. Friedman said that this recommendation is more of an internal sales force by taking
advantage of larger forces and associations to speak or contend with other entities about the
program as well. He said there are benefits and can show the performance of the program
today.
Recommendation 4—to direct staff to perform a fee analysis and present a revised fee
structure that would reflect a fee adjustment for Cutting Edge members.
Proposed Action(s) & Supporting Info:
•Authorize staff to initiate an amendment to the Maricopa County Environmental Health Code
once fee analysis and proposal is complete.
•A discounted fee would likely be more effective as an incentive at the point of renewal and
may increase retention in the program.
Mr. Friedman stated that the discounted fee would be based more on the businesses
performance in the renewal process.
Chairman Barney thanked Mr. Friedman for his time and work. He requested care be taken
with recommendation 1, and stated his belief that if more energy is spent on
recommendations 2 through 4 business owners will want or need to be a part of the program
for the value it creates.
Josh Hebert explained the Standardization & Consistency Subcommittee process that
resulted in twelve (12) recommendations. He stated that the overall theme was interest in
public safety and having restaurants become partners in that goal. He said that the
recommendations would help inspections to become more of an educational process. He
then presented for approval, Standardization & Consistency Subcommittee – Twelve (12)
Recommendations:
1. To research and contract with language interpreting services that allow the owners /
operators to have a greater ability to communicate with staff in their preferred language.
2. To add an area on the annual renewal permit form for the owner / operator to list their
preferred language.
3. To extend an inspector’s rotational time period in a specific area from every two (2) to
every three (3) years.
4. To establish a single point of contact for each of the four (4) industry classes: Full Serve;
Quick Serve; Retail (Grocers, Markets, Convenience); Specialty (Special Events,
Caterers, Mobile Food Vendors and all others)
5. Institute a Five-Minute Ice Breaker conversation between the inspector and operator at
the start of each inspection.
6. To allocate resources for an Information Technology solution used to implement and
support several of the recommendations submitted by the Task Force. All of the system
enhancements would be to improve service and communication.

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 5 of 13
7. To improve communication between the department and the industry by establishing a
subscriber-based newsletter that may be segmented by industry. Further, provide for a
subscriber option to receive notices, updates, best practices, and other topics of interest
via email.
8. To open the quarterly Internal Standards Committee to a public meeting format where the
meetings and agenda are posted for stakeholders to attend and participate. Further, to
have staff hold an annual stakeholder meeting to foster ongoing communication and
feedback from the industry.
9. To delay online posting of all inspection reports for a period of 3 business days to allow
the operator an opportunity to clarify or challenge items on the report.
10. To add a checkbox to the inspection report so the operator may request a supervisor
review.
11. To post a corrected inspection report online rather than an “Advisory” entry or note.
12. To form a committee of citizen stakeholders to design and develop a coversheet for
inspection reports explaining the nature of the comments in everyday terms. This will help
customers understand which violations are considered minor and avoid putting the
consumers at risk.
Supervisor Rogers stated that it appears that technology will play a large part in the
recommendations and she asked if the County is prepared for this cost and will there be a
need for an upgrade in the future.
Mr. Hebert responded that he is unsure about technology issues but the County employees
involved helped base the target dates accordingly.
Chairman Barney asked Mr. Manos about the cost associated with the recommendations.
Tom Manos responded that the County is able to implement all of the recommendations
according to the target dates. He said that there are a few recommendations that will require
technology advancements which will be the case in all of the regulatory advancements. He
stated that the technology advancements are smart investments and investing in smart
technology is more cost efficient rather than hiring more staff.
Scott Friedman and Josh Hebert presented for approval, the Plan Review Subcommittee –
Four (4) Recommendations:
1. To amend the definition / guideline for Minor Remodel Plan Review projects by only
inspecting the facilities and equipment directly affected by the work being reviewed – not
the full location.
Chairman Barney stated that regulations change over time and this is a good
recommendation.
2. Offer an After-Hours / On-Demand inspection option at an appropriate fee to meet the
operational demands of owners or operators.
3. To institute the option of executing a Compliance Order for a new owner of an existing
establishment to remain in business for a specified period while the required permits are
being obtained.

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 6 of 13
4. To adopt the 2013 FDA Food Code.
Supervisor Kunasek asked what food code is currently being used. Mr. Hebert responded
that it is the 2009 FDA Food Code.
Supervisor Kunasek asked if the change over from 2009 to 2013 is significant. Mr. Friedman
stated that there were only a few updates.
Mr. Hebert named a few of the updates and stated that many states and counties have
already adopted the code and this would be bringing Maricopa County up to standards.
Supervisor Kunasek asked if the new code is adopted will there be communications to
provide this information to license holders.
Mr. Hebert stated that one of the recommendations is how to handle communications.
Chairman Barney stated that it could go through the EROP process.
Supervisor Hickman asked what the average length of employment is for restaurant
inspectors.
Mr. Hebert stated that the Public Health Board has said the turnover was at 3-5% a year. He
explained his experiences with inspectors as an independent owner and believes the turnover
has been high.
Chairman Barney said that a lot of the recommendations are personality driven by both the
business owners and inspectors to work more effectively. He stated that having business
owners who are familiar with the process as part of the subcommittees helps to build
consensus and build ideas. He thanked the Subcommittee Chairmen for all their efforts.
Supervisor Hickman asked Mr. Friedman and Mr. Hebert if they believe these
recommendations are worthwhile because a lot of County departments will be involved in the
process.
Mr. Hebert responded that it did take time to come up with these recommendations and that
there was total agreement in determining ways to eliminate the antagonistic nature of the
inspection process. He said this is why a lot of the recommendations are to educate the
operators to succeed so that the Public Health Board can still do their job properly in the
interest of public safety. He stated that all restaurant owners want success and no one wants
a bad Public Health Board score, so these recommendations are meant to help. He clarified
that getting a violation is not a sign of doing something wrong but a sign that something
improper happened. In turn everyone can be educated as to why something is not right and
then correct the problem so it doesn’t happen again. Mr. Hebert said this is a more
successful process.
Mr. Friedman spoke on behalf of the franchises and stated that all of the operators want to do
a great job. He said he has had positive feedback from the operators because through this
process a relationship is being built. He said it is an educational effort and a win-win for all.
Chairman Barney said that as the Board of Supervisors they take the regulatory process
seriously and trying to manage the process into an effective and engaging process is
important. He believes that as other business operators hear the positive feedback from the
subcommittee members the more likely they will respond in a positive manner. He addressed
John Kolman and asked him to make sure the change happens.

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 7 of 13
Mr. Kolman said he is happy to accept the challenge. He stated the theme everyone shares
is that the public have a safe and enjoyable dining experience. He will continue to work with
everyone to make sure the food industry and public health relationships are the best in the
nation.
Supervisor Hickman stated that farmers worry about products safely produced at the farm
making it to the consumers in the same condition. He said that as a farmer, he appreciates
the time put into the recommendations because there are always so many steps. He said
that the end goal is to keep the community safe.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Kunasek
Supervisor Kunasek expressed his gratitude to all of the community members involved in
helping to create a regulatory process that makes sense and makes things better.
Ayes: Barney, Kunasek, Hickman, Rogers
Recused: Chucri
PRESENTATI0N
Facilities Management
3. PRESENTATION AND WORK SESSION OF 10-YEAR JAIL MASTER PLAN
Presentation regarding the Maricopa County 10-year Jail Master Plan.
Reid Spaulding, Director, Facilities Management Department
Mike Quinn, Architect, Arrington Watkins
(C-70-14-011-P-00)
Supervisor Chucri entered the meeting via telephone
Tom Manos stated that there is a lot of information within the presentation so it is important
that the Board Members ask questions as the presentation goes forward instead of waiting
until the end. He said the budget process is wrapping up and more than half of the budget is
spent on Courts and Criminal Justice. He stated that the jail facilities are aging and the
planning process helps to address the challenges with each facility.
Reid Spaulding, Facilities Management Director, thanked the Board of Supervisors for the
presentation opportunity. He welcomed Supervisor Rogers to the Board of Supervisors and
presented the following:
 Master Plan Timeline which spanned from December 2012 to June 2014
 Scope of the Master Plan—CGL Companies were asked to examine, identify and
recommend changes within each facility
 Jails Master Plan Stakeholders—several departments involved
 Qualifications of Consultants—architects, study groups, and team leader
Mike Quinn, Arrington Watkins Architect, thanked the Board of Supervisors for the invitation
to participate. He explained his involvement with the current and past Sheriff’s Office
projects. He presented the following:
Project Goals
 Jails Master Plan Goals: 10-year planning period; options for current facilities; future
needs; replacing aging facilities; improving existing jail sites; implementation costs
and schedules for renovations, demolition and construction

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 8 of 13
Scope of Work
 Scope of Work–5 Phases: initial meetings; data gathering; analysis and development
of facilities; draft master plan alternatives; and final master plan
Phase Summary
 Phase 1: Initial Meetings
 Phase 2: Data Gathering
Chairman Barney asked Mr. Manos if the guidelines factor in Risk Management elements.
Mr. Manos responded that they do. He said that having a standard and following it puts the
County in a better position to defend cases.
Mr. Quinn agreed with Mr. Manos and stated that the fall-back is the American Correctional
Associations (ACA) guidelines.
Mr. Quinn continued with the presentation about Phase 3 which included:
 Analysis
 Growth Analysis – Average Daily Population
 Growth Analysis – Bed Space Need (Aggregate) — current capacity is 8,600, and
with the percentage of growth over the next 10 years, the County will fall behind in
critical areas.
 Existing Facilities Tours
 Interviews and Walks
 Program Analysis
 Gap Analysis — out of the 34 facilities initially reviewed, the analysis was done on
the 7 major facilities.
 Program Analysis
 Area Analysis of Durango inmate cell area — only the quad cell space is a factor.
 Area Analysis of existing Durango Barrack House
 Area Analysis of ACA required Durango Barrack House
 Area Analysis of Historical Jail Capacity Figures
In response to a question Mr. Quinn responded that there is a difference between maximum
capacity and best use of facilities. He said that running at maximum capacity over-uses the
facilities. When the facilities are run beyond the designed capacity it prematurely ages.
Operating the facilities as recommended buys the County time to make adjustments by 2024.
There was discussion on the conditions of the Madison Street Jail facility as an example of
what could happen if constantly used at capacity.
The final components of Phase 3 include:
 Identifying Deficiencies of Durango Jail Benchmarking
 Identifying Deficiencies of Site Access Plan
Phase 4 would include the following:
 Phase 4: Draft Development Options
 Phase 4: Intake Overview
 Phase 4: Release Data
Chairman Barney asked why there was a drop in the pretrial numbers from 2008-2009.
Mr. Quinn responded with several scenarios for reasoning. He stated that the average length
of stay (how long an inmate typically is at the facility) is trending up and the average daily
population and bookings have been trending down.

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 9 of 13
Jerry Sheridan, Chief Deputy Sheriff, offered several factors that influence the overall jail
population: fewer police officers on the street; courts trending to home arrest; cities telling
Police Departments to cite and release due to costs; and officers not wanting to wait for long
booking times because it takes them off the street.
Additional components of Phase 4 include:
 Average Length of Stay Data
 Potential Cost Benefits
 72-Hr Intake/Transfer/Release Facility (ITR)
 Development Options
Mr. Quinn continued by presenting a series of options related to the Durango facilities in
Phase 5:
Chairman Barney recapped that in phase 5 beds would be added and then Durango would be
demolished. He asked if this would create a bottle neck because the Durango capacity would
be lost.
Mr. Quinn clarified that 640 beds are gained in the short term housing and these beds along
with the facility that has a capacity of 1,024 will allow the County to remain below the
threshold. He stated that the male population is growing, the female population is holding
steady and the sentenced population is dropping. Considering these trends, the County is
moving in the direction of the pre-sentenced male population where the growth is higher. He
said that the new facility would have with tiers containing more dense beds compared to
those in higher custody cell pods.
Supervisor Chucri disconnected –
Clerk’s staff successfully reconnected via telephone
Mr. Quinn continued by reviewing pros and cons to various options in the overall plan. Then
he provided some estimates of the costs for the plan. The financial report included funding
projections.
Supervisor Kunasek asked what the $7.3 million represented in phase 4.
Mr. Quinn responded that phase 4 is remodeling the 4th Avenue jail. This includes vacating
the intake and courts facilities and converting 24,000 square feet into special ports for those
in higher custody cell pods.
Supervisor Kunasek asked if the effective capacity is 7,400 and the desired capacity is 9,800.
Mr. Quinn said that with the desired capacity of 9,800 member allows an acceptable cushion.
He said that the County will be short on beds until the middle of the planning period and then
the numbers would balance out.
Chairman Barney stated that the 9,800 adjusts for the peaking and classification differential.
He said it is a challenge to keep the officers safe yet provide mandated conditions for those in
and out of custody. He stated the reality is that the County needs to come up with a strategy
to meet the ongoing demand.
Mr. Quinn responded that there is a rapid deployment option that will meet the demand in a
shorter time span. He explained the plan and related costs.

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 10 of 13
Mr. Quinn explained the rapid deployment option is to avoid escalation of building overtime
costs. The dollar amount is being used at different increments; and the 1024 phase is moved
up to phase 2. This saves the County $34 million in construction escalation over time.
Supervisor Hickman asked if the number of those in tent city would change.
Mr. Sheridan responded it would stay the same and that the tents will remain.
In response to a question from Supervisor Kunasek Mr. Manos responded that it is part of the
next steps to document how the Intake/Transfer/Release Facility (ITR) and secure campus
operational savings offset additional costs. The County will need to build the business case
to justify the public investments. He pointed out that the County is not in a crisis currently
because accommodations have been made. He stated that the Board of Supervisors started
setting aside funds years ago for the jails and the County has enough to fund the 1st four
phases – up to 2019 allowing the County time to finalize the jail master plan.
Mr. Manos stated that the per diem component of what the County charges the cities covers
the capital costs.
Supervisor Hickman asked if there is any other jail system that has a program where half of
the inmates are working to be productive to society and the other half is asleep.
Mr. Sheridan stated he is not aware of such a program. He said that Los Angeles County has
such a large jail system that there are 1,000 to 2,000 inmates on buses all day long.
Lee Ann Bohn, Finance Director, MCSO, stated that the Department of Corrections has
inmates that have been sentenced and three-fourths of the jail inmates are not sentenced
and are not used for labor. She stated that the County would struggle putting that group into
a labor situation and would be working within the margins.
Chairman Barney stated that it is an interesting idea but the County is dealing with
classification issues for the inmate population.
ACTION
Assistant County Manager - MaryEllen Sheppard
4. APPLICATION FOR REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP GRANT THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Approve the application for the Regional Partnership Grant from the Administration on Children,
Youth and Families - Children's Bureau through the Department of Health and Human Services.
The purpose of this grant is to improve the well-being of, and permanency outcomes for children
affected by substance abuse. The not-to-exceed total grant award is $3,000,000. The yearly not-
to-exceed award amount is $600,000 over five years. Also approve the in-kind matching
requirement of 15% for Maricopa County in FY2015 and FY2016 ($105,882 each year), 20% in
FY2017 and FY2018 ($150,000 each year), and 25% in FY2019 ($200,000). This matching
requirement is provided from budgeted salary and benefits from the Superior Court Cradle to
Crayons program from the operating General Fund.
Applications will be reviewed during the Summer 2014. Grant awards will have a start date no
later than September 29, 2014 and will run for 5 years. This grant does allow for the recovery of
indirect costs. $576,000 of the grant award will be pass-through funding which is not subject to
indirect cost recovery. Arizona State University will receive pass-through funding of not-to-exceed

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 11 of 13
$96,000 per year ($480,000 in total) for program analysis which is not subject to indirect cost
recovery. The Superior Court will receive pass-through funding of not-to-exceed $480,000
($2,400,000 in total) per year for service delivery which is not subject to indirect cost recovery.
Justice Systems Planning & Information (JSPI) will receive $24,000 per year for program analysis.
The indirect cost rate for JSPI in FY2015 is 34.4%, or $6,142.86 per year ($30,714.30 in total)
which is recoverable. (C-95-14-004-G-00)
MaryEllen Sheppard, Assistant County Manager, explained the funding is for a five-year
period and is specifically targeted.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Chucri, seconded by Supervisor Rogers
Ayes: Barney, Chucri, Kunasek, Hickman, Rogers
Government Relations
5. RESOLUTION TO APPLY FOR TRIBAL GAMING FUNDS FROM THE TOHONO O’ODHAM
NATION
Pursuant to A.R.S. 5-601.02, authorize by resolution, Maricopa County through the Office of the
County Manager to submit 21 applications to the Tohono O’odham Nation for Tribal Gaming Grant
funds for County departments and community non-profits as listed below. These funds are for
government or non-profit services that benefit the general public, including public safety, mitigation
of the impacts of gaming, or promotion of commerce and economic development. The total
amount of funds requested will not exceed $812,570.
Authorize the Chairman to sign all application documents related to these grant funds, as
applicable.
Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure limitation,
and therefore, expenditure of the funds is not prohibited by the budget law.
Upon award of grant funds, subsequent action will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for
acceptance of individual grant funds and execution of all necessary acceptance documents which
may also include an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA), Grant-in-Aid Agreement, or similar
documents. Indirect costs are not applicable to Tribal Gaming Grants. Additional agenda item will
include information on the unrecoverable indirect costs associated with grant awards. Additionally,
the acceptance agenda item will adjust the overall grant budget to accommodate these grants
through a future reconciliation.
Grant Applicant: Arizona State University
Grant Program: ASU VIP Student Coach Program
Amount Requested: $127,000
Grant Applicant: Central Arizona Shelter Services, Inc. (CASS)
Grant Program: CASS Homeless Assistance Services
Amount Requested: $20,000
Grant Applicant: Circle the City
Grant Program: Medical Respite Care for Men and Women experiencing Homelessness
Amount Requested: $50,000
Grant Applicant: Crisis Nursery, Inc.
Grant Program: Children’s Emergency Shelter Nutrition and Wellness Project
Amount Requested: $25,000

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 12 of 13
Grant Applicant: Eight, Arizona PBS
Grant Program: Indian Law Documentary
Amount Requested: $25,000
Grant Applicant: Girl Scouts--Arizona Cactus-Pine Council
Grant Program: Leadership Center for Girls
Amount Requested: $50,000
Grant Applicant: Glendale Union High School District
Grant Program: Parent/Community Involvement/Engagement
Amount Requested: $23,000
Grant Applicant: Heard Museum
Grant Program: Free Student Tours
Amount Requested: $75,000
Grant Applicant: Hope for Hunger Bank
Grant Program: 2014 Hunger Fighters
Amount Requested: $30,000
Grant Applicant: Human Services Campus/Lodestar Day Resource Center
Grant Program: Coordinated Assessment
Amount Requested: $70,000
Grant Applicant: Maricopa County Education Service Agency
Grant Program: Caring Communities Connecting Youth
Amount Requested: $39,900
Grant Applicant: Native American Community Health Center, Inc., dba NATIVE HEALTH
Grant Program: Improvement Project
Amount Requested: $10,000
Grant Applicant: Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation
Grant Program: The Phoenix Children's Hospital Crews'n Healthmobile
Amount Requested: $30,000
Grant Applicant: Ryan House
Grant Program: Respite Program Sponsor-A-Stay
Amount Requested: $50,000
Grant Applicant: Southwest Center for HIV/AIDS
Grant Program: Logan's Playground Child Watch
Amount Requested: $10,000
Grant Applicant: Southwest Human Development
Grant Program: Good Fit Childhood Counseling Center
Amount Requested: $50,000
Grant Applicant: Tumbleweed Youth Development Center
Grant Program: START -- Day Care Program
Amount Requested: $50,000
Grant Applicant: United Cerebral Palsy of Central Arizona
Grant Program: Enhancing the Educational and Therapeutic Needs of Young Children with Disa
Amount Requested: $25,000

Informal Meeting Minutes
Monday, June 09, 2014
Page 13 of 13
Grant Applicant: VALLEYLIFE
Grant Program: Vocational Training & Placement
Amount Requested: $10,000
Grant Applicant: VisionQuest 20/20
Grant Program: EyeSpy 20/20
Amount Requested: $32,670
Grant Applicant: VMLC Charities
Grant Program: VMLC Returning Warriors
Amount Requested: $10,000 (C-20-14-040-G-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Kunasek
Ayes: Barney, Chucri, Kunasek, Hickman, Rogers
RECESS/RECONVENE
Chairman Barney recessed the Open Session to reconvene in Executive Session to consider the
remaining Executive Session items.
MEETING ADJOURNED
After discussion on the listed Executive Session items, and there being no further business to come
before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.
________________________________
Denny Barney, Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
______________________________
Fran McCarroll, Clerk of the Board