04.CPA2600002 BOS REPORT PART 4.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2026-05-20)

View PDF Item 8 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 396361 characters
MBI Address
Staff Question/Address
N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Acknowledgement
Comment ID
Date posted
User name
Type
Comment
Page
Agree
Disagree
Response
Explanation
174 01/29/2026 - 5:20pm
Kathryn Chandler
Question
Why is Transit not included in the Urban Solutions for Urban Development Stragegy?  Lack of public transit 
or transit options always comes to the top of needs in resident surveys in county unincorporated areas. Not 
contentious, just a need that there needs to be a strategy for.  
100
3
0 MBI Address
The USUD does include public transit. 
Category 11 in the USUD was labeled as 
Transportation was intended to mean 
Alternative Transportation. The title for 
Category 11 in the USUD has been 
updated to Alternative Transportation.
175 01/29/2026 - 5:25pm
David L
Comment
In our unincorporated community, golf course water is regulated by the management plans of ADWR. Water 
conservation for residences and commercial entities is not regulated except by water bills. Unincorporated 
communities need ways to enforce conservation like most cities are now doing. We have commercial 
businesses that blatantly flood our streets time after time without any apparent concern. Our only defense 
is to try shaming them via news articles. How about a county wide regulation to mandate water 
conservation?
56
3
0 Acknowledgement
176 01/29/2026 - 5:31pm
Kathryn Chandler
Question
Why does Maricopa County provide regional transit services?  The residents of these unicorporated areas 
still pay into the Prop 479- Prop 400 before that and Prop 300 before that.  No city is going to annes in Sun 
City West so we still need a solution and look to the county as our municipality. 
121
0
0 Acknowledgement
Maricopa County is not a public transit 
provider. There are policies in the 
Comprehensive Plan that speak to the 
County's support of public transit from 
other providers in the County as is 
feasible.
177 01/29/2026 - 5:33pm
David L
Comment
There is a high population growth area shown on your map that is located just east of the intersection of SR 
303 and US 60. This is the location of Sun City West which has been built out for decades and therefore 
cannot continue to grow. Suggest thathis shaded area be moved north of the 303, a high growth area for the 
city of Surprise.
65
0
0 Acknowledgement
This is a map of past growth in 
unincorporated Maricopa County (2010-
2022). This map shows where 
population growth has occurred in the 
past decade. There is a map in the 
Growth Areas element that shows 
projected future growth. In this map, 
there is a high growth area north of 
Surprise and the 303 that yielded from 
the analysis as the commenter has 
observed. 
178 01/29/2026 - 5:33pm
Kathryn Chandler
Question
There are a number of new data centers going in throughout the county.  What are you doing to manage or 
regulate these centers so they do not negitively impact our air quality?
133
2
0 Acknowledgement
The Comprehensive Plan speaks to data 
centers and the planning issues that 
come with their development.
179 01/29/2026 - 5:35pm
Catherine
Comment
I urge the County to strengthen Framework 2040 by clearly tying growth approval to demonstrated, long-
term water availability, consistent with A.R.S. Title 45 and the intent of Arizona's Assured and Adequate 
Water Supply laws, and by adopting stronger conservation, reuse, and groundwater protection policies in 
unincorporated areas.  
1
4
0 Acknowledgement
Maricopa County is not a water 
provider. However, there are policies in 
the Water Resources element that 
voice the County's support for water 
conservation initiatives for the region 
and state. 
180 01/29/2026 - 5:37pm
Kathryn Chandler
Question
How will you midigate the impact of the Data Centers going in (one in Waddell an unicorporated area) on 
water usage and energy usage? 
196
2
0 Acknowledgement
The Comprehensive Plan speaks to data 
centers and the planning issues that 
come with their development.
181 01/29/2026 - 5:40pm
Catherine
Comment
The comprehensive Plan should further integrate extreme heat mitigation into water planning and land use 
decisions, recognizing the direct relationship between rising temperatures, increased water demand, and 
public health impacts.  Pursuant to the County's authority to protect public health, safety, and welfare 
under A.R.S. Title 11, the Plan should prioritize development standards that reduce heat-related water 
demand, including: Low-water, heat-adaptive landscaping, and urban canopy using drought-tolerant 
species. Site design standards that reduce heat absorptiona dn excessive outdoor water use. 
1
1
0 Acknowledgement
The Comprehensive Plan discusses 
Urban Heat and its need for 
consideration in the planning process in 
the Environment element.
182 01/29/2026 - 5:43pm
Catherine
Comment
I respectfully recommend that the Comprehensive Plan strengthen its technology policies to ensure that 
infrastructure planning, service delivery, and emergency response capabilities keep pace with growth in 
unincorporated areas, consistent with the County's authority and obligations under A.R.S. Title 11. 
1
0
0 Acknowledgement
The Comprehensive Plan retains the 
Urban Solutions for Urban Development 
stragey from the current Plan. This 
strategy evaluates the appropriateness 
of development among many factors 
including infrastructure and emergency 
services nearby for the new 
development.

173 01/29/2026 - 8:52am
S. Myers
Comment
Any phasing needs to take the end project into consideration plus potential expansion.  Roads, sidewalks, 
lights, sewers are too often torn up a year after they are put in due to the next phase starting.   
15
4
0 Acknowledgement
Maricopa County supports phasing 
plans for new development as noted in 
Policy 1.1 of the Draft Framework 2040 
Comprehensive Plan.
183 01/30/2026 - 7:34am
Elizabeth Fulghum
Comment
#3.5 unregulated parcel splits are a huge problem in the Chandler Heights Citrus Irrigation District county 
island. As long as property owners can split parcels without oversight, this will be hard to enforce.
18
0
0 Acknowledgement
Maricopa County supports subdivisions 
and does not support "wildcat" lot 
splits.
184 01/30/2026 - 7:37am
Elizabeth Fulghum
Question
#1.5 - How exactly? 
21
1
0 Acknowledgement
Environment Policy #1.5 supports the 
development of a dust control program 
that can be developed by the 
appropriate County department.
185 01/30/2026 - 7:46am
Elizabeth Fulghum
Comment
#1.1: Well this is clearly not happening. a) There are no Assured Water Supply certifications being issued 
and have not for some time. b) We are in a severe overdraft position already. How to enable growth when we 
are already unable to guarantee water for the future?  c) the process for county islands to even apply for 
Assured Water supply is lengthy, costly and most are denied. What's the point?
26
2
0 Acknowledgement
Water Resources Policy #1.1 speaks to 
the County's support of development 
that is subject to the ADWR Assured 
and Adequate Water Supply programs 
as opposed to developments that can 
occur outside of such water 
requirements, like "wildcat" 
subdivisions.
186 01/30/2026 - 7:48am
Elizabeth Fulghum
Comment
#2.2 In county island areas, where there is no sewer, where is "renewable" water use coming from? This 
policy clearly doesn't understand where water comes from. 
27
0
0 Acknowledgement
Water Resources Policy #2.2 is for all of 
unincorporated Maricopa County and 
not just County Islands. In 
developments with common area 
landscaping, water features, and other 
non-potable water uses, the County 
supports using renewable water 
resources.
187 01/30/2026 - 7:51am
Elizabeth Fulghum
Comment
#3.1 AGREE. New development coming in funds any and all infrastructure required to provide them 
services. Period. 
29
1
0 Acknowledgement
188 01/30/2026 - 9:26am
Elizabeth Fulghum
Comment
Agree! 
29
1
0 Acknowledgement
189 02/01/2026 - 8:09am
James
Question
What?  No plan for public safety.  MCSO has the lowest crime to arrest rate in Arizona, abysmal.  While drug 
poisoning deaths have declined overall in the US, Arizona's are skyrocketing, and Maricopa County and 
Phoenix are ground zero.  What's the plan for addressing the catastrophe?
5
0
0 Acknowledgement
There are discussions of the County 
Sheriff's Office and options for Fire 
Protection in the Land Use element of 
the Draft Comprehensive Plan. 
190 02/02/2026 - 1:45pm
Pat Sperry 
Question
Where is the section about Falcon Field, Mesa AZ. The noise and pollution from 15+ airline pilot schools is 
excessive. The nonstop touch and go activity over neighborhoods has become unbearable. Some pilots 
circle 12+ times over my neighborhood and then do 12 touch and go landings. That’s 24 noisy planes over 
my house. Multiply that by all the planes and you will see that this is a terrible situation. Is this being 
addressed?
80
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Not in unincorporated Maricopa 
County.
191 02/02/2026 - 2:41pm
Elizabeth Fulghum
Comment
3.5 This is just not happening in unincorporated Maricopa County. Wildcat lot splits are constantly 
happening here in Chandler Heights Citrus Irrigation District.  New lot splits every single month to evade 
subdivision requirements. 
111
1
0 Acknowledgement
Maricopa County does not support such 
development as stated in Land Use 
Policy #3.5.
192 02/18/2026 - 1:26pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
No, they don't believe in reducing impacts.  Please do not add "policies" that will only be ignored in the 
future.
16
0
0 Acknowledgement
193 02/18/2026 - 1:29pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
No, they don't.  They support cramming solar fields, battery storage fields, and large scale massive rezoning 
and developments in the middle of the desert where there is little infrastructure available or planned. 
15
0
0 Acknowledgement
194 02/18/2026 - 1:34pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
No, they don't.  Maricopa County only supports build it, build it, build it.  Especially the solar and battery 
fields.  They ignore the "unique aspects" of unincorporated living.  They think everyone should be squished 
shoulder to shoulder with neighbors or solar fields. 
18
0
1 Acknowledgement
195 02/18/2026 - 1:42pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
No they don't.  Solar fields and large commercial, industrial, and large scale housing developments get to 
move and rearrange floodplains, water channels, and disrupt natural flows all the time.  They encourage 
pavement which disrupts natural water absorption and flows. 
21
1
0 Acknowledgement
196 02/18/2026 - 1:44pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
No they don't.  Build it regardless of what any environmental impacts are.  Build it regardless of what 
animals are in the area naturally.  Pave it, build it, tear it up...that is the County's belief.  Those who try to 
preserve the natural area are denied permits or the burdens placed on the permits only serve to destroy the 
area; such as pavement.
22
1
0 Acknowledgement
197 02/18/2026 - 1:49pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Planning and Development waive setbacks, buffers, screening, and height limits all the time for these huge 
solar fields, battery energy storage facilities, and wireless communication towers.  
28
0
0 Acknowledgement

205 02/19/2026 - 10:33pm
Henery Smith
Question
There's 867 miles of alleyways in Phoenix, most of which is in the process of installing gates, ~1,200 
currently installed, min price $5,500 - total costs $6.6 million. If theres ~14 alleyways entrances per 7 
streets per 1 mile of arterial, that means theres estimated 12,138 alleyway entrances. It will cost the city 
$66,769,000 total to install gates on all the alleyways. The gates are to prevent the homeless from trashing 
it and criminals accessing peoples property from the rear. Is this really the most valuable use of public 
funds? Will you ever consider instead to repurpose some of these into pedestrian/bike paths? Is there a way 
to implement better ground collection for rainwater in the alleyways? If we turned all 867 miles of alleyway 
into green groundwater-collecting plants/architecture bicycle/pedestrian path, how many degrees would 
that cool the city down and how many gallons of water will be prevented from sudden surface evaporation? 
How can the police enforce policy against the homeless who would obviously take advantage of it? The only 
other option is to give the alleyways to the homeowners and allow them to extend their property line behind 
their house. This would make homewowners very happy but I think all options should be explored before 
giving homeowners their half of the alleyway. Does an alleyway have enough width for the lightrail? 
120
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
206 02/19/2026 - 10:36pm
Henery Smith
Comment
All sidewalks on arterials should be upgraded to 6 foot width. I often see handicapped people use the bike 
lane because theres a utility pole blocking the 5 foot width sidewalk and they physically cannot move 
around it in their wheelchair. 
120
2
0 Acknowledgement
199 02/19/2026 - 5:18pm
Chris Peterman
Comment
I wonder where we are suddenly going to come up with all this water we are going to need to accommodate 
all this growth? I didn't hear one thing  said about one of the most important issues. We are on a cliff that no 
one seems to give much thought about. Just the ou t that could be daved by people bei g mote mindful of 
their wayer usage would help. Other places I have live have had substantial savings doing that. But this state 
hasn't  put any resources into programs/PSA's, etc urging people to conserve and ways of doing that  I've 
noticed the same with recycling. Not a whole lot of effort into expanding  programs and urging of the  public 
to do their part. 
1
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
The County is not a water provider but 
does consider the water supply when 
evaluating new development.
200 02/19/2026 - 7:21pm
Kathy O’Donnell 
Question
There is never any forethought to traffic before construction. It doesn’t matter if it is commercial or 
residential the roadways are an afterthought. Why is this? 
1
2
0 Acknowledgement
201 02/19/2026 - 8:34pm
Henery Smith
Comment
Young people do not want to live anywhere near an HOA subdivision. They are forced to due to lack of other 
options. A local HOA last year tried to stop a man from giving people free water on his property during the 
summer heat.
18
5
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
202 02/19/2026 - 8:52pm
Henery Smith
Comment
You can help promote responsibility by paving a bike trail next to the parks and informing the public to ride 
on the trail. Many will choose the paved path vs gravel path
26
1
0 Acknowledgement
Bicycle paths for transportation and 
recreation are discussed in the Plan 
and supported by the County when 
feasible.
198 02/19/2026 - 8:56am
Staci 
Comment
South Mountain 202 north bound will back up 2-3 miles to transition to the westbound I-10. With only two 
lanes transitioning westbound why in the world does East bound have 3 lanes? No Carpool lane to go 
Westbound but one for Eastbound that no one uses 
1
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
203 02/19/2026 - 9:22pm
Henery Smith
Comment
The water is going to deplete and there wont be a consistent supply for anyone. If any state should build a 
desalination plant, it should be Arizona. Make new housing developments pay for the install
194
0
0 Acknowledgement
204 02/19/2026 - 9:51pm
Henery Smith
Comment
You misspelled paved* here. Ebicycles are now a very viable means for transport since you allow them 
inside the light rail. You need to improve the bike lane infrastructure to relieve traffic congestion. Adding 
more car lanes increases congestion - this is physics! Its called the Braess's Paradox. I think the best 
strategy is to add a bike grid with 1 mile spacing (like the arterials) but instead of placing it on top of the 
arterial roads, stick the bike grid halfway between it so it lines up in the center of the arterial grid. Roser runs 
east to west through the entire city (except Leisure World) and would be an optimal bike route to connect to 
light rail and Tempe downtown. Vineyard and Euclid should also get bike lanes. Perpendicular roads: 20th 
St, Montezuma/3rd St, 17th Ave, 39th Ave, etc. Unbuffered bike lanes on 45mph arterial 5-lane roads will 
never be inviting to 70-80% of all bicycle users but these users would use these lanes for the last 1/4 mile of 
their trip. If you setup a reliable biking grid on 25-35mph roads, Im sure ridership will visibly increase. 
Unbuffered bike lanes will result in fatal injuries for bikers, so many opt out.
120
1
0 MBI Address
Typo corrected
207 02/21/2026 - 10:25pm
Wayne Thompson
Comment
Arizona needs to solve the water crisis that is unfolding and could utilize the existing rivers, canals, and use 
pipes to create a circulation system by partnering with surrounding states and Mexico via deep desalination 
plants that pump water into the southwest from the Pacific Ocean, Gulf of California, and Gulf of 
America/Mexico into north flowing Rivers such as Santa Cruz and San Pedro plus the other creeks, washes, 
and canals tying into existing SRP/CAP. You can even bring pipes up into Arizona like we do oil pipelines that 
put water into the Salt River, Verde Rive, Little Colorado, and Lake Pleasant. Based on rain and snow melt 
you could control the water flow and adjust as needed creating a circulation system of the water like a heart 
with a brain. You can add all sorts of parks and recreational uses to the system and the wildlife would 
flourish as water flows though and allows the delta of the Colorado to flow again. It would be a win on all 
fronts and historic achievement of human engineering.
20
2
0 Acknowledgement
This is a suggestion for the State of 
Arizona to act. The County is willing to 
partner in support of regional, state, 
and federal water decisions.

208 02/21/2026 - 10:46pm
Wayne Thompson
Comment
If the water crisis is solved via my previous comment using deep sea desalination plants tied into the state 
it would help solve multiple problems. We could use the newly installed water supply infrastructure to 
prevent and put out desert and forest fires. We could establish riparian habitat and improve wildlife 
populations, it would help us cool the urban heat island effect and maybe restore historical monsoon 
patterns. We could create a trail system for recreational use that incorporates nature based on our rivers, 
lakes, and canals in a way similar to Indian Bend Wash in Scottsdale.  
 
 
In terms of transportation the light rail line should be extended from Gilbert and Main to travel to 
Polytechnic Campus ASU via Main Street to Sossamon going south until it reaches the Mesa Airport. The 
west end connection should end at the Cardinals stadium in Glendale. 
 
Trains should connect Tucson to Phoenix to Flagstaff and include further lines that make trips to San Diego, 
L.A. , Las Vegas, and Rocky Point. If you made it so they could transport cars in the trains like they do in the 
east coast you would ease congestion and create a tourism boom. 
 
All major roads in Phoenix Metro and Tucson metro should be two lanes each direction, bury the power 
lines, have a median filled with trees and shrubs acclimated to the desert, bike paths, and wide sidewalks 
with more trees/shrubs. If we did what I suggested paired with continued freeway improvements and 
extensions we would be a true paradise and envy of the world.
251
0
0 Acknowledgement
Many of these suggestions are outside 
of the purview of this Comprehensive 
Plan for Maricopa County, which is 
focused on unincorporated areas. 
209 02/22/2026 - 8:39am
Zach Gray
Comment
Jane, would you like to provide any constructive criticism in your comments? Shouting at the county 
government does not equate to policy change.
16
1
0 Acknowledgement
210 02/22/2026 - 8:50am
Zach Gray
Comment
I believe it is essential to our city's aesthetic, cultural identity, and ever-increasing dependence on tourism 
in winter months that we focus more on scenic corridors and do what we can to support and grow them. 
Our city is instantly recognizable in any photo lineup without even needing to see downtown's buildings. It 
should feel that way to anyone living or visiting here the second they walk outside or hop on a freeway.
91
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
211 02/22/2026 - 8:56am
Zach Gray
Comment
New developments almost always feel isolated and walled off from the surrounding, preexisting 
infrastructure  they're constructed near. The county should do more to improve walkability and 
connectedness not only to create more walkable, traversable areas to cut down on 
traffic/emissions/asphalt square footage, but to improve quality of life and health of residents in these new 
areas. Too often do new developments (here and otherwise) dump millions into the land without so much 
as extending a sidewalk a final 50 yards to the next street over.
110
1
0 Acknowledgement
212 02/22/2026 - 8:58am
Zach Gray
Comment
This should include mixed-use development, e.g. office space with restaurants and small/micro green 
spaces to keep people in the areas after traditional work hours and bring new worth, value, and intrigue to 
otherwise "dead" areas on weekends.
111
1
0 Acknowledgement
There is a Mixed Use zoning category 
avaialble for such development in 
unincorporated Maricopa County. 
213 02/23/2026 - 8:56am
Christopher
Question
What actions is Maricopa County taking to eliminate existing county islands? Also, why is Maricopa County 
allowing building subdivisions on unincorpored land when it doesnt offer the same type of resources that 
cities do. Why are we allowing homebuilders to build master planned communities in unincorporated 
areas? If a developer wants to build a subdivision, Maricopa county should require they annex into a city 
first.
74
3
0 Acknowledgement
Land Use Policy #1.8 states that 
Maricopa County supports the 
prevention of forming new County 
Islands. State statute also forbids the 
creation of new County Islands. 
214 02/23/2026 - 9:02am
Christopher
Comment
Again, why is Maricopa County allowing urban development in unincorporated areas. Homebuilders of 
subdivisions should be required to annex into a city in order to build their planned subdivisions.  
Unincorporated areas should be rural only.
76
6
0 Acknowledgement
215 02/23/2026 - 9:08am
Christopher
Comment
I would add in here that Rural Metro is a "FOR PROFIT" company, and as such its subscripition fees are two 
and even three times the cost of what fire protection in one of the fire districts would cost a homeowner. 
Maricopa County should attempt to get all incorporated areas in a fire district eventually.
86
0
0 Acknowledgement
216 02/23/2026 - 9:13am
Christopher
Typo
District 5 should say District 7 which covers the area of Fountain Hills and Rio Verde.  The Sheriffs Office 
considers Lake Patrol as District 5 , and District 6 use to be Queen Creek, but it no longer exists since they 
incorporated.
88
0
0 MBI Address
This has been corrected.
217 02/23/2026 - 9:14am
Christopher
Typo
This district cover downtown Phoenix, should say . This district coverS downtown Phoenix.
88
0
0 MBI Address
This has been corrected.
218 02/23/2026 - 9:16am
Christopher
Typo
District 7
89
0
0 MBI Address
This has been corrected.
219 02/23/2026 - 9:19am
Christopher
Comment
I recommend a staffing study be done to find out if Maricopa County has enough Deputies. The Sheriffs 
Office has even less Deputy positions now then it did in 2008 despite the drastic population growth and 
increased demand for services. These average call times seem very long, 8 minutes is a long time to wait 
when there is an immediate threat to life.
88
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
This is an analysis that would have to be 
conducted by the Maricopa County 
Sheriff's Office.
220 02/23/2026 - 9:43am
Christopher
Comment
Correction, this is District 4 (Cave Creek/Anthem) , but the District 5 label should say District 7 which is 
fountain hills.
89
0
0 MBI Address
This has been corrected.
221 02/23/2026 - 9:49am
Christopher
Comment
Maricopa County should not allow Urban Developments since it does not support the infractrure/services 
that cities and towns do. Maricopa County should only allow rural development, and if a builder wants a 
build a subdivision, they should be required to annex into the city.
100
2
0 Acknowledgement

222 02/23/2026 - 9:58am
Christopher
Question
Is there a way to require municipalities to annex roadways that are already within their city borders and are 
being used by their city residents? Lower Buckeye road for instance between Cotton Lane and Sarival 
Avenue is maininted by the county but currently is completely surrounded by the city of Goodyear. The 
roadway is in bad shape, one lane in each direction with potholes everywhere and will get even worse when 
the Loop 303 expansion is done and Cotton Lane and Lower Buckeye road becomes an exit on that freeway.
123
1
0 Acknowledgement
Municipal annexation of County 
roadways between municipalities is 
encouraged and supported by the 
County.
223 02/26/2026 - 4:19pm
Kerry Laughlin
Question
When is Infrastructure, Electric & Sewer being planned for area near Rainbow Valley? SPECIFICALLY Pecos 
& Tuthill Road??  Land IS zoned R43 (1 acre) being sold .15acre right now. 
73
0
0 Acknowledgement
224 03/02/2026 - 4:50pm
Barry Glickman
Comment
The story "1,000 protest ICE center in Surprise" on page 3A in the Valley and State section of the Arizona 
Republic of Thursday February 5, 2026 reported that a vacant 418,400 square foot warehouse at 
Sweetwater Avenue and Dysart Road in Surprise was purchased by the U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency to be used as a detention center for 
undocumented immigrants. 
 
Zoning laws should not allow a building of this size to be built without specific tenant(s) or buyer(s).  Zoning 
laws at the local and state level should not allow a building of "about more than seven footballs fields" to be 
built speculatively at one location. This would prevent the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency 
from purchasing another building of this size in the future to house 1,500 or more detainees.  
 
113
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
225 03/03/2026 - 10:45am
David Yohn
Comment
I used the search function and see nothing concerning support for residential solar energy production nor 
for electric vehicle charging infrastructure.  I think the county should support both things.  I would also 
support regulations requiring new commercial or industrial construction to include solar or wind energy 
production systems as part of any new construction or major remodeling..
207
1
0 Acknowledgement
226 03/03/2026 - 10:46am
Susan Saunders 
Comment
It's time to start building vertically for expansion, not horizontal. Responsibility in land use.
15
1
0 Acknowledgement
227 03/03/2026 - 10:50am
Susan Saunders 
Comment
If you want better transportation you need to implement more light rail coverage. Incentivize ride sharing. 
Regulate cab pricing. Build a toll-road
19
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
228 03/03/2026 - 10:53am
Maria
Question
Are we going to look at creating more affordable housing options? All I see are luxury complexes going up 
and homeless encampments not 50 ft away. You can't get people off the streets if they can't afford the 
housing that's going in. 
17
2
0 Acknowledgement
Land Use Policy #3.1 states that 
Maricopa County supports mixed 
housing options.
229 03/03/2026 - 10:55am
Kristi Chua
Question
Is Maricopa County looking into recycling sewage water for use as drinking water? This has been done in 
many water-scarce locations.
27
0
0 Acknowledgement
Development of such a kind is 
supported in the Water Reosurces goal 
and policies, however, the County is not 
a water or sewer provider.
230 03/03/2026 - 11:03am
Maria
Comment
Honestly, I do not see a wide variety of affordable housing in Phoenix. Every open land space gets gobbled 
up by someone building luxury apartments or condos. Please put your money where your mouth is. 
36
0
0 Acknowledgement
Land Use Policy #3.1 states that 
Maricopa County supports mixed 
housing options.
231 03/03/2026 - 11:06am
Margaret Wilson
Comment
Water is highest priority.
13
2
0 Acknowledgement
232 03/03/2026 - 11:26am
Maria
Comment
With water issues in Arizona being what they are, we do not need data centers in the desert sucking up 
valuable water and energy resources. 
150
1
0 Acknowledgement
233 03/03/2026 - 11:34am
Maria
Comment
That's unsupportable. Do not turn Arizona into Texas with high energy costs and an unstable grid. 
207
1
0 Acknowledgement
234 03/03/2026 - 11:43am
Kevin Chaffee
Comment
Water sustainability and affordability should direct all other county decisions. 
1
4
0 Acknowledgement
235 03/03/2026 - 12:51pm
Chuck Van Hyning
Comment
The document won’t open. all I get is the ability to comment. 
1
0
0 Acknowledgement
236 03/03/2026 - 2:14pm
Ken McAlister
Comment
there are many county island roads that are dirt and when people that do not live in the community drive 
fast on the roads they g=create excessive dust.  More dust in just the evening time than a whole 
construction site during the entire day.  Why not do some kind of dust abatement or control on these roads 
by laying crushed asphalt down and then oiling the millings to get a tough surface.  or something similar in 
these areas.  It would drastically bring down your ppm of dust particles.
142
1
0 Acknowledgement
The Comprehensive Plan speaks to the 
need for controlling dust pollution as 
important for the County's air quality.
237 03/03/2026 - 3:38pm
Nancy
Question
Hi, It’s quite stunning all the new buildings going up in the county, commercial and residential…..how can 
we possibly have enough water for all this new development…..very concerning…..please advise how we 
can sustain this please and thank you….NK 
6
1
0 Acknowledgement
241 03/04/2026 - 1:36pm
R Johnson Jones
Question
Does this include unincorporated areas such as Wittmann?
17
0
0 Acknowledgement
Yes
242 03/04/2026 - 1:41pm
R Johnson Jones
If BNSF is allowed to start building on the 300 and so acres in Wittmann, does this set them up to build on 
the land that was denied zoning without approval?
18
0
0 Acknowledgement
The Board of Supervisors voted not to 
approve a BNSF development in 2025. 
This Plan does not change that 
decision.
238 03/04/2026 - 12:39pm
Enrique
Comment
Consider revising language for Land Use Policy 5.4 to: Maricopa County supports coordinated planning 
efforts between local, state, and federal agencies, including but not limited to the Rio Reimagined regional 
initiative.
113
0
0 Acknowledgement
Change not incorporated.
239 03/04/2026 - 12:43pm
Enrique
Comment
Consider revising part of sentence to: 
 
...coordinate with the regional Rio Reimagined project that seeks...
185
0
0 Acknowledgement
Change not incorporated.

240 03/04/2026 - 12:47pm
Enrique
Comment
General comment: Consider "spotlighting" the Rio Reimagined regional project somewhere in the 
document to celebrate this long-standing regional project that involves 6 cities, 2 tribal communities, SRP, 
ASU, and Maricopa County.
5
1
0 Acknowledgement
Change not incorporated.
243 03/04/2026 - 2:23pm
R Johnson Jones
Environment #3.1 thru 3.3 
The rural land between 60/74 & 211 needs Maricopa County Support.   
It is  not responsible planning by BNSF to build in this area because of the growth and traffic in Wittmann.  
We appreciate your allowing us to respond and help for the future wellbeing of Maricopa.
22
0
0 Acknowledgement
246 03/05/2026 - 1:05pm
Nancy 1
Comment
Funds need to be set aside for an additional dog shelter to open ASAP. The pound is full of pets that were 
adoptable when they arrived. The overcrowding, constant noise, in a cage on a concrete floor, not being 
walked leads to anxiety which leads them to be euthanized for a condition the County actually caused! The 
County has a responsibility to improve the conditions. The County must act immediately. Last week 10 
dogs were killed in two days. The County’s reputation is at stake. Please, please open another shelter. The 
overcrowding just keep getting worse. Thank you.
29
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
247 03/05/2026 - 1:27pm
Nancy 1
Question
An additional animal shelter is desperately needed to ease the overcrowding at the current locations. Too 
many pets are being euthanized. They are healthy when they get there, but with the constant noise, barking, 
cages clanging, they become afraid and anxious and withdrawn. Because of the behavior caused by the  
stress, they are euthanized due to the shelter conditions. So very sad. Last week 10 dogs were killed in just 
two days. This makes room for the next bunch to be traumatized. County has a responsibility to provide 
humane(sic) conditions for the dogs. Please add another shelter facility. 
There must be money somewhere available to accomplish this. Please see it in your heart to help a large 
part of our community.
29
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
248 03/05/2026 - 1:39pm
Nancy 1
Comment
Need funds for an additional animal shelter location. The Pound is seriously overcrowded and dogs are 
being euthanized just to make room for incoming. This is a desperate situation and the. County is looking 
very bad across the country for their inadequate handling of the problem. Just suck it up and allow the funds 
for additional animal shelter facilities. At least talk about it. Thank you.
29
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
245 03/05/2026 - 12:02pm
Susan 1
Question
I am concerned that the county will adopt a plan where the county can override or allow developers to 
override city zoning change decisions thus facilitating developers wishing to go against the zoning/ building 
desires of the local residents.
34
0
0 Acknowledgement
This Plan seeks to enact a level playing 
field for all actors in the development 
process through a logical and 
consistent implementation of the 
Urban Solutions for Urban Development 
strategy.
244 03/05/2026 - 7:37am
Donald Karner
Comment
With Data Centers now allowed to bring their own generating facilities, Maricopa County should develop 
plans to shape these facilities. For example Terra Power development of small modular nuclear reactors to 
support data centers should be addressed to include issues for nuclear power such as emergency planning 
and water use. Fossil fueled generation should also be addressed to include air emissions and water use. 
These data centers and their generation facilities will be great resources for Maricopa County. Plans should 
facilitate adoption while assuring harmony with other County objectives and plans.
207
1
0 Acknowledgement
256 03/06/2026 - 1:39pm
Jose
Does the county have a hillside ordinance regarding height restrictions and architectural aesthetics to 
prevent eyesores? 
138
0
0 Acknowledgement
There is a Hillside Ordinance in the 
recently updated Maricopa County 
Zoning Ordinance.
249 03/06/2026 - 11:22am
Jose
Comment
MC should create energy standards that other agencies can follow or adopt. 
13
0
0 Acknowledgement
The Comprehensive Plan's energy 
policies speak more to energy needs 
related to development. This Plan does 
not have a mechanism for regulating 
utility companies.
250 03/06/2026 - 11:23am
Jose
This may increase the cost of housing prices, and we need to find a balance to keep housing prices low. 
13
1
0 Acknowledgement
251 03/06/2026 - 11:32am
Jose
High standards may increase the cost of building the dwellings. I would like to see a solution to have a high 
standard and keep costs down. 
17
0
0 Acknowledgement
252 03/06/2026 - 11:34am
Jose
The Assessor's Office and Recorder's Office need a policy to prohibit wildcat lot splits. 
18
1
0 Acknowledgement
Land Use Policy #3.5 speaks to 
Maricopa County not supporting 
"wildcat" subdivisions.
253 03/06/2026 - 11:39am
Jose
Bus stop facilities in the unincorporated areas of the county need to include full infrastructure, such as 
shade structures, lighting, and seating for pedestrians.  
19
1
0 Acknowledgement
254 03/06/2026 - 11:46am
Jose
I agree with this goal; we need to protect our open space and trails. 
25
1
0 Acknowledgement
255 03/06/2026 - 12:16pm
Jose
We need to protect our scenic corridors to preserve our identity. These corridors should be observed by the 
instructions that annex them. 
91
0
0 Acknowledgement
The Comprehensive Plan speaks to the 
importance of the County's scenic 
corridors.
257 03/07/2026 - 12:12pm
marc cameron
Comment
Considering the recent efforts by Homeland Securty to purchase a building in Surprise I would propose that 
you include language that either prohibits using commercial buildings for human detention facilities and 
that such types of acquisition go through rigorous publice scrutiny for approval.  At the least make them 
disclose the purpose and make them go through all regulatory and enviornmental steps.
3
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan

271 03/09/2026 - 1:14pm
Samantha
Question
Is there a way to cap SRP and APS prices?
29
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
272 03/09/2026 - 1:20pm
Samantha
Comment
i like this section. i do think you've done decent work and am happy to be living here.
43
0
0 Acknowledgement
273 03/09/2026 - 1:22pm
Samantha
Comment
for both climate and water, i would like to see more R&D on real experiments to make arizona livable and 
water efficient.
56
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
274 03/09/2026 - 1:27pm
Samantha
Typo
typo
69
0
0 MBI Address
This has been corrected.
275 03/09/2026 - 1:37pm
Samantha
Comment
im glad this is on the strategy!
100
0
0 Acknowledgement
276 03/09/2026 - 1:40pm
Samantha
Question
corner stores and bodegas would fit here? it'd be nice to have a place for a quick item rather than a full 
grocery store with a massive parking lot. 
105
1
0 Acknowledgement
277 03/09/2026 - 1:44pm
Samantha
Comment
Let's not spend time, money, and effort on renaming highways to unimportant and divisive people.
117
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
266 03/09/2026 - 10:03am
Samantha
Comment
Still waiting on the commuter train connecting Tucson / Phoenix / Flagstaff! 
20
0
0 Acknowledgement
267 03/09/2026 - 10:05am
Samantha
Comment
I'm a fan of this. studies have shown that constant traffic noise can increase memory deficincies like 
dementia. 
21
0
0 Acknowledgement
268 03/09/2026 - 10:24am
Samantha
Comment
I would support adding bike/scooter racks at metro hiking trails, like camelback. that would relieve a lot of 
the parking pressures. Unsure if this exists already. 
26
0
0 Acknowledgement
269 03/09/2026 - 10:26am
Samantha
Comment
this section doesn't seem to be thought out well enough. not enough guidelines or restrictions. 
26
0
0 Acknowledgement
Maricopa County is not a water 
provider. However, there are policies in 
the Water Resources element that 
voice the County's support for water 
conservation initiatives for the region 
and state. Additionally, water supply is 
one part of many factors evaluated for 
develoment in unincorporated areas. 
270 03/09/2026 - 10:28am
Samantha
Comment
I would like to see animal bridges/crossings over the highways. This has proven to reduce accidents, lower 
insurance costs, and save lives (humans and animals).
21
0
0 Acknowledgement
278 03/09/2026 - 5:42pm
Jan Hancock
Question
Which portion or chapter of the Plan includes or provides the details of the equesrian-use areas and trails in 
the Plan?
181
0
0 Acknowledgement
258 03/09/2026 - 9:05am
Samantha
Comment
It's important that "multimodal" is emphasized. Phoenix should be more than cars. The bike infrastructure 
should be expanded with proper, separated lanes. Also, the train and bus schedule should run much more 
often, especially the connection between lines. 
13
0
0 Acknowledgement
259 03/09/2026 - 9:09am
Samantha
Comment
Rent prices shouldn't be able to increase beyond a few percent lease over lease. Rent prices should be 
lowered as opposed to "5 weeks free" deals. A wide range of houses for ownership should be built with 
density. Limit the amount of single-family homes owned by corporations. 
13
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
260 03/09/2026 - 9:16am
Samantha
Comment
This land use policy should be moved up in priority. More effort should be put into protecting animals and 
ecosystems. It's sad to see the number of dead animals (like coyotes) on the side of the road after being hit 
by vehicular traffic. Just because this email seems scary, doesn't mean we should take away their habitat. 
16
0
0 Acknowledgement
261 03/09/2026 - 9:21am
Samantha
Comment
I like that this land use policy exists and it should apply to all residential developments like master-planned 
communities. They have the opportunity to build resources within walkable or transit distance, but choose 
not to. This is especially noticeable in gated communities, where there isn't an ability to put a bus or train 
stop nearby. 
16
0
0 Acknowledgement
262 03/09/2026 - 9:34am
Samantha
Comment
HOAs should not exist outside of townhomes, condos, or similar. Single-family homes within subdivisions 
do not need an HOA. 
18
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
263 03/09/2026 - 9:40am
Samantha
Comment
I would support announcements on the streetcar to be helpful and brief. For example, an announcement on 
when the next train is would be amazing, not just when it's 2 minutes away. This should also be shown on 
the scroll screen at each stop. 
19
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
264 03/09/2026 - 9:40am
Samantha
Typo
Link this TIP here.
19
0
0 Acknowledgement
265 03/09/2026 - 9:46am
Samantha
Comment
Right of way needs to be enforced for the safety of walkers and bikers. 1. walkers, 2. bikers, 3. vehicular 
traffic
19
0
0 Acknowledgement
279 03/12/2026 - 11:15am
Deina
Comment
This should be labeled Surface Water, not reclaimed water.
193
0
0 MBI Address
This has been corrected.
280 03/12/2026 - 11:39am
Deina
This should include stronger language requiring that new development HOA open space and Commercial 
landscapes align with the Chapter 6 requirements of ADWR's 5th Management Plan for the Phoenix AMA.
198
1
0 Acknowledgement
Maricopa County is not a water 
provider. However, there are policies in 
the Water Resources element that 
voice the County's support for water 
conservation initiatives for the region 
and state. Additionally, water supply is 
one part of many factors evaluated for 
develoment in unincorporated areas. 
281 03/15/2026 - 8:24pm
Richard J Clout
Comment
In the foreseeable future  - 8 -12 years forget what most people consider renewable energy -- solar & wind 
and focus on natural gas and nuclear energy.These are proven, sustainable and relatively low cosrt when 
compared to alternatives
13
0
0 Acknowledgement
283 03/16/2026 - 1:48pm
Amanda Monize
Comment
A major consideration to zoning should be available water resources, especially as it pertains to 
unincorporated and rural areas reliant on groundwater and/or hauled water. If water supply is insufficient or 
scarce then flexible zoning or rezoning should be restricted. 
Please add "water resources" as an element to the challenges already listed here. 
150
3
0 Acknowledgement
Water Resources is an element of the 
Comprehensive Plan.

284 03/16/2026 - 1:51pm
Amanda Monize
Comment
Please add water source/availability to planning considerations/constraints for growth.
165
1
0 Acknowledgement
Water Resources is an element of the 
Comprehensive Plan.
285 03/16/2026 - 1:56pm
Amanda Monize
Comment
This Water Quality/Availability statement is very important and I hope the county makes this more 
prominent considering the current state of negotiations on the Colorado River and pending cuts coming to 
the state. 
167
0
0 Acknowledgement
282 03/16/2026 - 7:02am
Kristen Stevens
Comment
My understanding is that this is the guiding document for MCDOT roadway classifications. It would be 
helpful this this was legible and included roadway names. Its challenging to reference for traffic studies for 
example.
119
0
0 MBI Address
Roadway names added to functional 
classification map.
287 03/17/2026 - 11:25am
Leslie Beauchamp
Comment
I read 3.1 as an education campaign and 3.2 as local control collaboration.  How are you measuring the 
impact of these policies in terms of water conservation vs. processes?   Water Resources goals and policies 
would benefit from greater specificity, accountability, and actual investment rather than just support. 
 
-Include measurable goals and transparent reporting of water use reduction, water loss, increased 
reclaimed water use, and conservation efforts 
-Expand incentives for conservation, including gray water systems, low-water landscaping, and business 
efficiency upgrades 
-Address high-water-use land use, such as encouraging golf courses to transition to lower-water or 
reclaimed water models 
- More clearly prioritize investment in reclaimed water and conservation-based incentives 
If you are expecting increased growth, these investments could be built into the growth models.  
199
0
0 Acknowledgement
288 03/17/2026 - 11:45am
Leslie Beauchamp
Comment
Consider how growth and development impacts all of Maricopa County services.  This section focuses on 
physical infrastructure but does not consider services required to support growing communities. 
 
Include essential public services that support our well-being and ensure economic stability, such as 
education support (via the County School Superintendent’s Office under A.R.S. §15-302), public health, 
human services, and libraries.  
-Ensure these agencies are included in growth planning and coordination 
-Clarify how growth-related funding will support them 
-Additionally, County leadership is well positioned to convene partners even now and help steward cost-
sharing strategies, particularly for education, where increased development directly impacts student 
populations and service needs.  Schools could use your leadership in using cost-sharing Educational 
Service Agency models that other counties use to share professional support costs across the county.   You 
are not going to get the growth you want if the public school system doesn't get the support it needs to 
thrive and support further development.  
214
1
0 Acknowledgement
The Comprehensive Plan does not 
enact policies that govern the school 
districts.
289 03/17/2026 - 11:58am
Leslie Beauchamp
Comment
I appreciate this section and its focus on long-term cost considerations. MC service agencies would benefit 
from stronger County leadership in advancing intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) and fee-for-service 
models that create efficiencies across agencies. This may require initial investment to launch and 
coordinate these efforts, but it can lead to more sustainable, cost-effective services over time. 
For example, the County could help establish shared service models where education and public health 
supports are provided to schools or municipalities through fee-for-service agreements, reducing 
duplication and strengthening outcomes. 
By convening partners and supporting these models early, the County can help build scalable approaches 
that lower long-term costs while improving service delivery.  
219
1
0 Acknowledgement
290 03/17/2026 - 2:46pm
Laurel Arndt
Comment
This is section should include more discussion, identification and goals in support of the conservation of  
NATURAL open space corridors (washes, Floodplains, rivers). Cities in the west valley are working to 
preserve wildlife corridors and linkages as part of open space plans (City of Buckeye, Surprise and Peoria). 
The County needs to look at these plans and see how the same areas connect and can be 
preserved/protected to allow conservation AND development to coexist. Open Space is NOT just about 
programmed County parks and County open space.
184
1
0 Acknowledgement
This discussion occurs more in the 
Environment element.
291 03/17/2026 - 2:52pm
Laurel Arndt
Comment
Soft edges is too subjective and lends itself to too much interpretation by a land owner and developer. The 
correct language is simply "edge" treatment or better yet "buffers" between natural open space and 
development. Design guidelines should be developed for what the buffer treatments should be 
(width/vegetation/landscaping) based on adjacent types of development they will buffer 
(washes/trails/parks/ natural landscapes/sensitive resources/wildlife corridors.
184
0
0 Acknowledgement
292 03/17/2026 - 2:57pm
Laurel Arndt
Comment
I applaud this strong directive and to be fair a same statement needs to be included which states the the 
County will coordinate with the planning of Cities and agencies to preserve wildlife corridors and linkages. 
Please look to City of Buckeye and Surprise and the BOR/CAWCD along the CAP. Future County 
transportation proposed/planned corridors need to accommodate and not negatively impact infrastructure 
already in place to facilitate wildlife movement (culverts/roads, and overchutes. 
)
185
0
0 MBI Address
Coordination with municipalities added 
to Open Space Policy #1.3.

293 03/17/2026 - 3:02pm
Laurel Arndt
Comment
Existing residents and new  and future residents value natural open space and preserves. The metric of 
number of parks to residents is out of date and does not reflect what our residents expect on the edges of 
the county where growth is occurring. Residents move there for the open space, trails and access to nature 
not pocket parks or remnant parks in a HOA's or even Count Parks. They want to know they do not have to 
always drive to get to a nearby County park- trails and pathways are more favored as a recreational amenity 
rather than empty retention field operating as a soccer field/park.
185
0
0 Acknowledgement
294 03/17/2026 - 3:05pm
Laurel Arndt
Comment
This is narrowly focused, please include partnering on non programmed parks and natural municipal 
trails/major washes/rivers/ and water ways i.e. (Hassayampa, Jackrabbit Wash- 
187
0
0 Acknowledgement
Non programmed park nature and 
environment are covered more in the 
Environment element.
295 03/17/2026 - 3:09pm
Laurel Arndt
Comment
All of these policies are weighted to park lands. The Goal states preservation of Open Space..this includes 
non programmed natural space. It is important to preserve the natural landscapes with in County parks and 
non developed areas which have low development potential due to slope/floodways etc etc. and can be  
designated as open space. Again refer to cities towns (Cave Creek/Buckeye/Peoria/Surprise) , 
187
0
0 Acknowledgement
Non programmed park nature and 
environment are covered more in the 
Environment element.
286 03/17/2026 - 8:10am
Caryl
Comment
Either you are using outdated information or have ignored the merger of North & South County to ARIZONA 
FIRE & MEDICAL AUTHORITY that serves Tonopah, and parts of Buckeye in addition to several other 
communities - Sun City West, Sun Lakes, Guadalupe, and Wittmann.
86
1
0 MBI Address
The language for the Fire Protection 
section in the Land Use element was 
rewritten for accuracy.
296 03/18/2026 - 2:55pm
Laurel Arndt
Comment
This should include other municipalities to ensure connections and collaboration for future growth and 
needs of communities. It is important to make these physical connections and not miss out on them by not 
knowing what other municipalities are planning and creating
187
0
0 MBI Address
Coordination with municipalities added 
to Open Space Policy #1.3.
297 03/19/2026 - 1:19pm
John Thompson
Comment
You should not be re-zoning Rio Verde Valley (388 acres) from Rural-43 into R-2, R1-6, R1-7, R1-8, R1-10, 
R1-18, R1-35, R-70 and R-190 to take on a massive housing development.  We purchased based on current 
zoning as this will have a negative impact on current homeowners that moved here for a rural lifestyle not to 
mention the strain on water resources, traffic and lower property values.
4
5
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
298 03/21/2026 - 1:48pm
Amanda Monize
Comment
Any applications to increase density or rezone from Rural-43 in areas that border or include National/State 
Forests, preserves, or other conservation lands should be subject to heightened scrutiny, including 
demonstrated long-term water availability, adequate road, and mitigation of environmental and wildlife 
impacts to preserve natural habitats, rural landscapes, and existing low-density communities.
21
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
299 03/21/2026 - 5:17pm
Amanda Monize
Comment
Zoning in areas where there is established access to federal and state recreation should be protected and 
preserved to minimize impact. This should include restricting high density zoning in such areas. 
26
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
300 03/21/2026 - 8:19pm
Pamela Jean Miller
Comment
The plans of rezoning rural areas does nothing to help conserve water in a place where water shortages are 
already a huge concern. Unless infrastructure is going to be brought in to ensure no water issues no rural 
areas should be considered for rezoning.
13
8
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
301 03/21/2026 - 8:21pm
Pamela Jean Miller 1
Question
We moved here because of the current zoning, 1 residential home per acre. To get away from homes right 
next to each other.  
What about water? How will you justify more water from the river or i imagine they will just tap into the 
ground water and lower our water table so more wells are inoperable.  
What about traffic? Like it isn't already horrible on the 2 lane RVD....   
Impact on the environment and Wildlife...  
There isn't anyplace left to escape to.. this was one of the last areas with 1 acre restrictions.
14
4
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
302 03/21/2026 - 8:47pm
Kim Waldum
Comment
my concern: The Rio Verde Foothills is often threatened by fire. There is only one main road out of Rio Verde 
Foothills which cannot possibly be allowed to get even more congested with so many more people. Moving 
people and animals out quickly will be impossible and extremely unsafe. Imagine feeling desperate, driving 
out in smoke hardly able to see, trailers with animals fail and now you are unable to get out. People will die 
and that did not have to happen.
1
5
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

311 03/22/2026 - 1:05pm
Caylee Jensen
Comment
Rio Verde Foothills should remain an unincorporated community because its lifestyle and land-use 
character are rooted in rural independence and open space. My family and I chose this area specifically to 
live outside city limits, with fewer urban restrictions, lower density, and a closer connection to Arizona’s 
desert landscape and animals. We respect, appreciate and admire our area being a part of the dark sky 
ordinance, rezoning any bit of our foothills and surrounding area would alter life out here as know it.  
 
For decades, Rio Verde Foothills has functioned as a county-governed rural community, not an extension of 
nearby cities. Incorporating or forcing annexation would fundamentally change the area—bringing 
increased zoning restrictions, higher taxes, and urban development patterns that conflict with the very 
reasons people moved there in the first place. 
 
Our community has already faced challenges, including the water crisis that arose when outside municipal 
supply was cut off, highlighting the risks of depending on city infrastructure while not being part of that city.  
 
However, the long-term solution—developing independent water access and infrastructure—shows that 
unincorporated communities can adapt and create sustainable systems without losing their autonomy.  
 
Arizona is growing quickly, and not every area needs to become another suburb or city neighborhood. 
Preserving unincorporated areas like Rio Verde Foothills helps maintain balance—protecting open land, 
wildlife corridors, and the diverse ways Arizonans choose to live. 
 
I respectfully urge state and county leaders to protect the unincorporated status of Rio Verde Foothills and 
allow our community to continue shaping its future on its own terms.
46
6
1 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
312 03/22/2026 - 1:16pm
Pigysue
Comment
Concerning the proposed zoning changes recently submitted to Maricopa County for Rio Verde Foothills, I 
strongly oppose the rezoning of our rural communities for multi-family development due to serious 
concerns about safety, infrastructure, and sustainability. Our area is already impacted by a well-
documented water crisis. Increasing housing density will place additional strain on an already limited 
resource, with no clear, sustainable plan to meet that demand. 
 
Equally concerning is our limited access. With essentially one-way ingress and egress along Dynamite 
Road/Rio Verde Drive between Fountain Hills and Pima Road, evacuation during an emergency—such as a 
wildfire—would be dangerously constrained, as has already been demonstrated. Adding more traffic will 
only increase congestion and risk. 
 
Emergency response is another critical issue. Restricted access raises serious concerns about whether 
fire, police, and medical personnel can reach residents quickly when every second matters. 
 
These are fundamental public safety concerns affecting all rural areas under consideration. Until they are 
fully addressed, this type of development is not appropriate for our rural communities. We chose to live 
here for the open space, dark skies, and rural lifestyle that supports horses, livestock, and a lower-density 
way of life—not high-density housing. 
 
Thank you.  Susan Marriott 
1
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
313 03/22/2026 - 2:04pm
Caylee Jensen
Question
How can Rio Verde Foothills have a lack of water and resources when MorDo Ranch is proposing 700 units? 
How is that going to help our community and its limited resources? 
240
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
314 03/22/2026 - 3:30pm
Victoria
Comment
I oppose reasoning to accommodate additional homes.
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
315 03/22/2026 - 3:48pm
Victoria
Comment
Comment on lack of water resolution and future distribution based on unresolved Colorado River allocation-
it seems prudent to not allow 700 homes to be built without a resolution. Our animals and wildlife depend 
on water to survive. 
87
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
316 03/22/2026 - 4:15pm
Michael
Comment
Rio Verde road and the roundabouts adequality cannot accommodate added traffic from the dense 
community proposed. 
13
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
317 03/22/2026 - 4:18pm
Michael
Comment
Water is scarce & procuring it complex. Water may not be adequate for the dense community proposed 
over the long term. 
13
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
318 03/22/2026 - 4:20pm
Laura Ellis
Comment
Not enought road!!
13
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
319 03/22/2026 - 4:20pm
Laura Ellis
Comment
Not enough water!!
13
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
303 03/22/2026 - 6:24am
Ann Bergren 
Comment
Current available water sources and resources will not support development practices for building sites of 
less than 1 acre, and likely needs 5-10 acres for sustainable water availability going forward. 
1
4
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

304 03/22/2026 - 6:34am
Ann Bergren 
Comment
Current road infrastructure cannot safely accommodate additional building, especially to the proposed 
magnitude; there is a two lane road in and out which for us, when we chose to live out here was appealing, 
typically, a non rural type person does not choose to live in places like we have here with the minimal 
infrastructure. The quiet beauty of the desert will be lost to the constant roar and light of the traffic which 
would accompany a build of this proportion. 
1
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
305 03/22/2026 - 6:41am
Ann Bergren 
Comment
This is a rurally zoned community where people walk with friends and family, pets, ride bicycles, and 
horses.  It’s time to preserve and celebrate these few special areas that still exist. Denser populations will 
bring the rapid demise of this grand Arizona tradition.  Let us continue to preserve this special place in a 
time when few communities like ours continue to exist. 
1
4
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
306 03/22/2026 - 6:46am
Ann Bergren 
Comment
Our area cannot tolerate the pollution associated with increased vehicle traffic, it is ringed in by mountains 
trapping and blocking air movement which can result in micro climates and pockets with poor air quality. 
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
307 03/22/2026 - 6:55am
Ann Bergren 
Comment
Arizona promotes dark sky, we need to support this and our surrounding communities, like the Fountain 
Hills Dark Sky Discovery Center. Let’s be a great neighbor and reduce any increase in light pollution and 
support this Arizona mission to preserve and promote dark sky, not just for its citizens but for our amazing 
wildlife! 
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
308 03/22/2026 - 7:02am
Ann Bergren 
Comment
A build of this density and magnitude will decimate our local habitats and biology affecting critical local 
flora and fauna all the way down to our river.  The flora and fauna of our deserts needs to be preserved. 
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
309 03/22/2026 - 7:40am
Ashley Quick
Comment
Preserving rural neighborhoods in Maricopa County is essential. These unincorporated areas are already 
facing strain on water resources and increased traffic, and further rezoning will only worsen those 
challenges. Residents choose to live here specifically to escape city density and maintain a rural way of life. 
These communities should be protected, not reshaped into something they were never intended to be.
13
6
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
310 03/22/2026 - 9:38am
Cindy Trollope
Comment
People who choose to live in unincorporated areas such as the Rio Verde Foothills do so because they seek 
a rural lifestyle, not urban development. Our homes near the Tonto National Forest provide dark skies at 
night, important wildlife habitats, and a rural way of life that is not available in many other places near to a 
major city such as Scottsdale/Phoenix. The Foothills include a significant ranching population of horses 
and cattle, animals that do not coexist well with urban communities. Additionally, our water in the Foothills 
is already limited. Urban development would put a serious strain on an already challenged supply of water 
to the area. Finally, we frequently face evacuation of humans and livestock due to wildfires. We have only 
one major point of ingress/egress and already face challenges with density during evacuation. Urban 
development would significantly worsen this issue and create a serious threat to life in emergencies. 
76
6
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
320 03/23/2026 - 10:57am
Justin
Comment
I live right in the area of the potential land sale and housing development. I’m very concerned about this. 
The major issue is water. As you know, this area water situation is very delicate. Those of us that are on 
Wells rely on this dramatically. The number of houses proposed would directly impact the people currently 
living there and caused potential for water to dry up. This is a very delicate situation in the Rio Verde 
Foothills and potentially for us individually. My other concern is infrastructure. This many people would 
cause significant increase in traffic, noise, pollution, etc. Rio Verde Road is already very dangerous the way 
it is and increasing the amount of traffic would increase the chances of accident. There would also be more 
paved roads likely, and who would pay the bill for this? All of this undeveloped land is beautiful desert even 
it being private. The smaller lots would decrease the ruralness of our area. Please consider not allowing this 
area to be rezoned. Thank you .
24
6
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
321 03/23/2026 - 12:07pm
Melissa
Comment
Please understand that unincorporated areas such as Rio Verde Foothills do not have the water to support 
zoning beyond 1 dwelling/acre. We also have beautiful preserve and national forest limiting safe exit routes 
in case of emergency. This area should remain rural and any and all zoning decisions should reflect that. 
3
6
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
322 03/23/2026 - 2:36pm
Ryan Pinick
Comment
I strongly support a Comprehensive Plan that prioritizes long‑term protection of native wildlife habitat and 
sustainable water use in this planning area. Maricopa County’s desert ecosystems are already under 
pressure from fragmented habitat, drought, and climate‑driven extremes, and additional up‑zoning here 
would further stress wildlife corridors, riparian washes, and the limited vegetation that supports local 
species. 
​Given the region’s finite groundwater and surface‑water supplies, any increase in residential density 
beyond 1 dwelling unit per acre risks outpacing available water, increasing reliance on groundwater 
pumping, and undermining the County’s own goals for responsible growth and resource conservation. I 
therefore urge the County to: 
Maintain a maximum density of no more than 1 residence per acre in this area; 
Explicitly recognize and protect existing wildlife corridors, washes, and critical habitat through low‑density 
zoning, conservation easements, and open‑space requirements; and 
Require that any future development demonstrate a sustainable, verifiable water supply that does not 
degrade regional aquifers or harm surface‑water‑dependent habitats. 
These steps would align the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan with its stated purpose to guide growth 
while preserving natural resources, public safety, and quality of life for current and future residents of 
unincorporated Maricopa County.
21
4
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

323 03/23/2026 - 2:49pm
Dan
Comment
The thought of adding more housing to Rio Verde Foothills is absolutely astonishing. How can you even 
think of adding potentially 700 homes into the Mordo Ranch proposed development.  Where is the water 
coming from? New homes built after Dec 2024 are not even eligible to buy into Epcor if there well runs dry.  
The current area has no utility water company so how are these new homes going to get water, where is it 
going to come from?  No more wells can be drilled out here, we are going to drain the aquifer in less than 10 
years at this rate.  What about road infrastructure.   Currently, Rio Verde Dr/Dynamite Rd can't even support 
the amount of homes this county has allowed to be built.  We have to stop the development until real 
infrastructure is built out here, that includes a real sustainable water source, roads, etc.  
194
6
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
324 03/23/2026 - 3:45pm
Grant
Question
Where are you going to get the water required for the Rio Verde Foothills County Island. Drilling new wells for 
a 700 dweling master plan will SEVERELY harm the already dwindling flows for existing wells Rio Verde. Who 
will pay for me to drill a deeper well if this new Master Plan goes through?
74
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
325 03/23/2026 - 3:47pm
Grant
Comment
Why would the Rio Verde foothills help affordable housing? Existing residents in the area chose to live away 
from town with the increased commute. Housing more than 20 minutes from any grocery store is hardly 
'affordable'. Sounds like you are stretching to make this connection in the Rio Verde foothills.
77
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
326 03/23/2026 - 3:50pm
Grant
Comment
Adding 700 units to the Rio Verde foothills would be DISASTEROUS to the existing 2 lane roadway and its 
functionality. In the event of a disaster, the County will be on the hook for overcrowding the area and not 
planning the infrastructure accordingly. 
77
4
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
327 03/23/2026 - 3:52pm
Grant
Comment
Adding 700 homes to the Rio Verde foothills area, with only 2 2-lane roadways used to exit the area in the 
event of a disaster, would hard emergency procedures and hinder the communities ability to exist quickly.
86
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
328 03/23/2026 - 5:09pm
Jan Elder
Comment
We currently live in a rural zoned community which is why the majority of the people purchases in the area. 
Lots are one acre for farming, ranches, etc. We do not want more houses on smaller lots 
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
329 03/23/2026 - 5:11pm
Jan Elder
Comment
We do not have water available for these smaller lots. We are currently paying premium rates for hauled 
water and do not want additional lots needing more water causing the current residents to deal with water 
issues again. 
1
6
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
330 03/23/2026 - 5:12pm
Jan Elder
Comment
We are a dark sky community and we don’t need additional lighting for even more housing. 
1
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
331 03/24/2026 - 10:29am
eugene kutz
Comment
I am commenting as a Rio Verde Foothills resident who lives off 136th. I am formally opposing the rezoning 
request associated with the Mordo Ranch development proposal — approximately 700 residential units 
located between 156th and 160th Street. My opposition is grounded in two critical concerns: 
 
1. WATER AVAILABILITY Rio Verde's water infrastructure is not equipped to support a development of this 
scale. This community has already experienced firsthand the consequences of water insecurity with wells 
drying up and leaving residents without water service when Scottsdale terminated its water hauling 
agreement in 2023. While steps have been taken since, the underlying supply constraints have not been 
resolved. Approving 700 additional units before the community has achieved long-term, sustainable water 
security is premature and irresponsible. Density approvals must follow infrastructure capacity — not 
precede it. 
 
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND INCOMPATIBLE DENSITY Rio Verde is a low-density, rural-character 
community. Residents chose this area specifically because of its open space, limited traffic, and quiet 
neighborhoods. A 700-unit development fundamentally changes that character. The cumulative impact on 
roads, public services, school capacity, and quality of life for existing residents has not been adequately 
addressed. 
 
I urge the Commission to deny this rezoning request and require any future proposal to demonstrate: - 
Verified, long-term water supply commitments from a legally designated provider - Infrastructure studies 
showing roads and services can absorb the density - Community engagement that reflects the preferences 
of existing Rio Verde residents This community deserves growth that is responsible, measured, and 
sustainable — not density driven by developer timelines. 
1
6
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
332 03/24/2026 - 12:17pm
Stephen Allen
Comment
Our Parks Department NEEDS FUNDING. Please consider not forcing Parks & Rec to keep expanding while 
refusing to fund them with taxpayer support. You cannot keep reasonably expecting one of the largest 
regional park systems in the US to rely more than 50% on volunteer labor just to (barely) function. 
13
0
0 Acknowledgement
333 03/24/2026 - 12:19pm
Stephen Allen
Comment
Better hurry! All the parks are being encroached upon by development, especially concerning at Lake 
Pleasant given the City of Peoria's sudden, aggressive expansion. 
17
0
0 Acknowledgement
There are policies in the 
Comprehensive Plan that speak to 
protecting the Regional Parks.

334 03/24/2026 - 4:13pm
Amy
Comment
The Rio Verde Foothills MUST maintain its current zoning and NOT permit lots smaller than 1 acre. 
Absolutely NO special re-zoning permits should be considered or approved. Health, (fire, emergency, 
traffic) safety, quality of life, and most importantly, water availability is critical to maintain. Higher density 
zoning does NOT support these Land Use Goals & Policies.
16
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
335 03/24/2026 - 4:35pm
Tracy Hanks
Comment
I am writing as a Rio Verde Foothills resident to formally oppose the rezoning request associated with the 
Mordo Ranch development proposal — approximately 700 residential units located between 156th and 
160th Street. My opposition is grounded in two critical concerns:  
1. WATER AVAILABILITY Rio Verde's water infrastructure is not equipped to support a development of this 
scale. This community has already experienced development issues firsthand and the consequences of 
water insecurity — residents were left without service when Scottsdale terminated its water hauling 
agreement in 2023. While steps have been taken since, the underlying supply constraints have not been 
resolved. Approving 700 additional units before the community has achieved long-term, sustainable water 
security is premature and irresponsible. Density approvals must follow infrastructure capacity — not 
precede it.  
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND INCOMPATIBLE DENSITY Rio Verde is a low-density, rural-character 
community. Residents chose this area specifically because of its open space, limited traffic, and quiet 
neighborhoods. A 700-unit development fundamentally changes that character. The cumulative impact on 
roads, public services, school capacity, and quality of life for existing residents has not been adequately 
addressed. I urge the Commission to deny this rezoning request and require any future proposal to 
demonstrate: - Verified, long-term water supply commitments from a legally designated provider - 
Infrastructure studies showing roads and services can absorb the density - Community engagement that 
reflects the preferences of existing Rio Verde residents This community deserves growth that is 
responsible, measured, and sustainable — not density driven by developer timelines.  
Respectfully, 
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
336 03/24/2026 - 4:36pm
Terry Hanks
Comment
I am writing as a Rio Verde Foothills resident to formally oppose the rezoning request associated with the 
Mordo Ranch development proposal — approximately 700 residential units located between 156th and 
160th Street. My opposition is grounded in two critical concerns:  
1. WATER AVAILABILITY Rio Verde's water infrastructure is not equipped to support a development of this 
scale. This community has already experienced development issues firsthand and the consequences of 
water insecurity — residents were left without service when Scottsdale terminated its water hauling 
agreement in 2023. While steps have been taken since, the underlying supply constraints have not been 
resolved. Approving 700 additional units before the community has achieved long-term, sustainable water 
security is premature and irresponsible. Density approvals must follow infrastructure capacity — not 
precede it.  
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND INCOMPATIBLE DENSITY Rio Verde is a low-density, rural-character 
community. Residents chose this area specifically because of its open space, limited traffic, and quiet 
neighborhoods. A 700-unit development fundamentally changes that character. The cumulative impact on 
roads, public services, school capacity, and quality of life for existing residents has not been adequately 
addressed. I urge the Commission to deny this rezoning request and require any future proposal to 
demonstrate: - Verified, long-term water supply commitments from a legally designated provider - 
Infrastructure studies showing roads and services can absorb the density - Community engagement that 
reflects the preferences of existing Rio Verde residents This community deserves growth that is 
responsible, measured, and sustainable — not density driven by developer timelines.  
Respectfully, 
1
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
337 03/24/2026 - 4:48pm
Amy
Comment
The Rio Verde Foothills MUST maintain its current zoning. NO exceptions! The reasons have been listed by 
many in the comments of this document - WATER, fire safety, emergency services access, ranch lifestyle, 
preservation, traffic congestion, etc. KEEP the Rio Verde Foothills RURAL! 
46
4
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
338 03/24/2026 - 5:47pm
Debra DeVrou
Comment
I oppose 700 home Development 150th st area in RVF which has a water crisis still! Our roads are not 
equipped, we are a dark sky community and do not want our zoning changed to accommodate this 
expansion. It is a bad idea 
172
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
339 03/24/2026 - 5:50pm
Debra DeVrou
Comment
Do not build up our rural areas RVF is the area I want to see unchanged. We already lack water in our area 
and unimproved roads  cannot handle 700 home sub division on 150th we are a dark sky community 
174
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
347 03/25/2026 - 10:02am
Stephanie
Comment
At a minimum, we ask that a thorough impact study be conducted and that the voices of current residents 
be meaningfully considered before any decisions are made. Just because there is one very wealthy person 
out in the Rio Verde Foothills, looking to maximize their profits of their land does not make it right for the 
entire community! The voices of many should out way the voice of one.
1
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

348 03/25/2026 - 10:03am
Stephanie
Comment
The collective voice of an established community should carry greater weight than the interests of a single 
landowner seeking to alter its character.
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
349 03/25/2026 - 10:06am
Stephanie
Comment
Introducing a higher concentration of homes into an area with no guaranteed, sustainable water supply is 
not only irresponsible but risks repeating and amplifying these same hardships. Increased density would 
place additional strain on an already fragile and finite resource, threatening both current and future 
residents’ ability to secure reliable water for basic living needs. Who would be responsible if that were to 
happen? No one would care - they just look at profit. Council needs to think of the people who make up this 
community. Keep it to One Acre lots - that is plenty of homes to build. More would RUIN this community.
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
350 03/25/2026 - 10:13am
Julie
Comment
Why urban development in an unincorporated area even a thing? 
 
And, unless a city annexes an unincorporated area, the issues raised here are moot. Statements such as 
"lack of access to municipal services" don't reflect the fact that people who purchase property in 
unincorporated areas do so precisely because they ARE unincorporated. Residents understand the risks 
and undertake the responsibility for their needs. 
 
Problems arise when the zoning changes from R-43, increasing the density, and that's on the county not the 
residents.  
 
Please don't write this plan from the perspective of a city dweller, using phrasing such as "a key challenge 
that most....experience". That's subjective and misleading, even somewhat insulting. It even is contrary to 
the Terms & Conditions: "consider others values, experience and views". 
76
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
351 03/25/2026 - 10:27am
Julie
Comment
The Rio Verde Foothills is a relatively small unincorporated area that's essentially "landlocked" by national 
forest, mountains, and cities, with one small east-west corridor for ingress-egress.  
 
This area should never change from the current R-43 zoning. It cannot accommodate a population density 
increase.  
 
In case of wildfire, evacuation of humans and horses and animal rescue organizations is already a major 
concern. The area mustn't be allowed to have subdivisions with hundreds of additional people and vehicles 
to be accommodated. Keep it rural. 
 
Private wells have been going dry, and EPCOR supplies only a relative few properties. Any zoning change 
that allows a subdivision would require that development to tap into the aquifer, putting private wells at 
further risk. 
 
RVFH remains a wildlife habitat and corridor between the national forest and the McDowell Mountains, the 
Preserve and McDowell Mountain Regional Park. Overdevelopement would compromise this.
46
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
352 03/25/2026 - 10:38am
Lisa Treat
Comment
Water, road access to/from our area, loss of our rural lifestyle - just a few of the reasons I am opposed.  NO. 
PLEASE.  Do not change the zoning to our area.   
 
Build a city in the city area, not here.  
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
340 03/25/2026 - 7:49am
Ann Shriver
Comment
I have serious concerns about all the building going on here in the Rio Verde Foothills. Water and traffic are 
the big ones.  
 
Water- there has been no study about the aquifer that all our wells draw on, could it just dry up from all the 
new construction tapping in? Then there would be a real water problem. 
 
Traffic- there is only one way in and out. If there is a fire we are pretty well stuck. As is, is is not unusual to 
have to wait 5-10 minutes to get out on Rio Verde Drive. If there was a disaster it would be near impossible 
to get out. When there is an accident on Rio Verde it takes hours before you can get out. A real concern for 
any medical emergency. We need to stop the multiple houses on small lots until these items are addressed 
and fixed.
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

341 03/25/2026 - 9:51am
Chris Shriver
Comment
My wife and I moved to this area over 8 years ago from the NW.  I understand the need for more housing in 
the greater area.  The feeling of the neighborhood, Rio Verde Foothills, is very country, equine, and the most 
unique area left in the greater Phoenix area.  Development has destroyed so many neighborhoods in 
Phoenix we don’t need to loose any more. 
  Now real reasons to keep out big development is the lack of infrastructure.  Our water issues has been big 
news over the past few years.  The aquifer is very limited and most likely over used now.  The lack of a resent 
study doesn’t help us understand the issue.  Trucked water isn’t going to help either, it’s already over 
reached.  Will Scottsdale let the County install a water line to support big development, because there is no 
where else it can come.  Next is sewage, how to deal with that, septic is a non-stater for big development.  
Now for run off, who gets hit with the water a mud produced by lots of new homes.  The final huge issue is 
traffic.  We have one road that is our major access.  We had a Concrete Truck tip over a month ago.  This 
created miles of stand still traffic.  Going way out of the way to Fountain Hill or a dusty dirt trail served as the 
only access.  The road is busy and dangerous to access now, add 1000’s and we are in big trouble. 
Infrastructure or the lack of it should be the main reason to limit development in our neighborhood.  We 
can’t expect the county to keep up with it.  Adding more roads isn’t really an option.  Regulating 
development is the best choice.
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
342 03/25/2026 - 9:53am
Stephanie
Comment
In the Rio Verde Foothills many households in our area rely on hauled water or private wells, some of which 
have already experienced depletion. Introducing a higher concentration of homes would place additional 
strain on an already fragile and limited water supply. This raises serious questions about long-term 
sustainability, water access, and the potential impact on existing residents’ ability to maintain reliable 
water sources.
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
343 03/25/2026 - 9:54am
Stephanie
Comment
There are many thing to say about the proposed changes, beyond infrastructure and water concerns, this 
proposed change would fundamentally alter the rural character of our community. Many of us chose to live 
here based on the current zoning and density expectations. A shift toward higher-density development 
would not only impact quality of life but could also affect property values and the overall integrity of the 
area.
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
344 03/25/2026 - 9:56am
Stephanie
Comment
We do not have county-maintained roads; instead, residents are solely responsible for the maintenance 
and repair of our roadways. Increased density would inevitably lead to greater traffic, accelerated road 
degradation, and higher costs for existing residents who are already managing these responsibilities 
without public support. We do not want to change this. We moved out here because of this. 
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
345 03/25/2026 - 9:57am
Stephanie
Comment
Our community highly values its rural character, including the preservation of dark skies. With minimal 
development, we currently experience low light pollution, which supports local wildlife, maintains the 
natural desert environment, and is an important quality-of-life factor for residents. Increased density would 
inevitably bring additional artificial lighting, contributing to light pollution and permanently diminishing the 
dark sky conditions that make this area unique. It would tear apart what this community continually tried to 
save!
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
346 03/25/2026 - 9:59am
Stephanie
Comment
It is also important to recognize the unique nature of one-acre minimum lot zoning in areas such as ours, 
located just outside city limits. This type of zoning creates a critical buffer between urban development and 
rural living, allowing residents to maintain space, privacy, and a lower-impact lifestyle while still being 
within reach of nearby cities. The preservation of one-acre lots supports responsible land use, reduces 
strain on limited infrastructure and water resources, and helps maintain the transitional character that 
prevents unchecked urban sprawl from encroaching into rural communities.
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
353 03/26/2026 - 5:40pm
Sandra Lappano
Comment
NO to MorDo Development.  
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
354 03/26/2026 - 5:56pm
Sandra Lappano
Comment
Should an emergency or evacuation arise with the existing infrastructure, the likelihood of a FATAL situation 
is increasingly likely.  The LIABILITY would be with the County, and possibly Scottsdale, for allowing the 
rapid growth without providing enough exits for residents in the Rio Verde Foothills.  Please do not approve 
the MorDo Development project.  Make wise choices for preserving the rural feel by keeping the original 1 
acre or more parcels.
47
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

362 03/27/2026 - 11:00am
Julie
Comment
When considering housing, you must also consider lifestyle; they cannot be separated. You must recognize 
the necessity of multiple lifestyle options and understand that some lifestyles do not mesh.  
 
In an urban setting, traditional single-family home neighborhoods work well with newer subdivisions, and 
those neighborhoods blur with the varieties of higher density apartment-style residences.  
 
As cities built out to meet their boundaries, these urban dwelling styles pushed out larger properties of 
acreages with horses and other lifestock. Those displaced rural-flavored moved to the unincorporated 
county lands, and they did so fully understanding the trade-offs. They valued the rural-flavored lifestyle 
enough to forfeit municipal infrastructure and conveniences.  
 
*Do not allow zoning changes that would expand the urban lifestyles into the unincorporated county.* Just 
as there is need for urban residences, so too is there need for rural properties.  
 
Rural and urban do not mix. If zoning changes were allowed for any development, any subdivision, in an 
unincorporated county, massive changes would ensue---and it would be at tremendous cost to rural 
property owners and to the county.  
 
When assessing housing occupancy in unincorporated Maricopa County, do so with specific areas in mind 
and with their unique qualities and conditions in mind. *Keep the rural zoning intact, and keep the higher-
density zoning to the municipalities.* 
77
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
363 03/27/2026 - 11:14am
Julie
Comment
Re "need to address the spectrum of housing factors"... 
 
Include in those factors the very real need for lifestyle differences, i.e., urban vs. rural---and that they do not 
mix.  
 
Include the fact that all costs for everything in life have increased. 
 
Include the fact that rezoning a rural unincorporated area to meet housing needs does NOT mean new 
housing will be any more affordable than elsewhere. 
 
And include the fact that it's less expensive (in every way) to continue building up, within the urban areas, 
than it is to build new in unincorporated areas that haven't the infrastructure to accommodate the 
population increase. 
 
79
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
364 03/27/2026 - 2:46pm
Eileen Parisi
Comment
I strongly oppose Case CPA260001 & Z260002 and urge you to vote NO. Reduce the effectiveness of 
emergency response and public safety services
11
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
365 03/27/2026 - 2:48pm
Eileen Parisi
Comment
I strongly oppose Case CPA260001 & Z260002 and urge you to vote NO. 
  Overburden rural infrastructure and roadways
10
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
366 03/27/2026 - 3:33pm
Michele Craig
Question
What will it take to stop the building out here.  We have no water for this new development- where will the 
water come from?  The roads can’t handle another development- the traffic is challenging enough.  
2
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
367 03/27/2026 - 5:32pm
Kristin Bonfiglio
Comment
No to MorDo!!! Further development in the Rio Verde area, will greatly impact this long standing rural area 
for not only the horse community, but also the residents that have purposely moved away from the urban 
areas to enjoy the peace and tranquility that this desert possesses.  Residents with the current population 
already feel our delicate water, and roads strains. another large housing development is not necessary nor 
wanted.We residents enjoy our larger 1 acre + zoning and this should absolutely not change. Another 
concern should be on our already fragile eco system, from the desert fauna, wildlife to their natural 
environment.  Please do not change our beloved home. 
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
368 03/27/2026 - 7:20pm
Henk Esmeijer
No to MorDo Development
60
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
355 03/27/2026 - 8:57am
Maryl
Comment
I am a Rio Verde Foothills resident. Built home in 2023 with hauled water setup (as 50+% of our community 
have, others have wells that also have hauled water as backup due to low performing wellls). Where are you 
planning to get water for this Mordo Ranch (700 homes/rezoned)???  Please say no to this new subdivision 
between 156th St and 160th St. We just went through 5 years of a fight to retain our long time water source 
from Scottsdale. They cut us off. (National News). Then we wound up with a poor and expensive solution, 
using Epcor water. The prices are rediculous and were poorly developed. We are in talks with ACC now to re-
evaluate the water pricing and delivery at this time. The Epcor just stated Jan 2026. We cannot share our 
water with a new 700 home community. There is already a Toll Bros community going in with 1200 homes 
and Trilogy is supposed to be expanding plus a shopping mall is going in at 176th St. Let me add that we 
don't have the road structure to support the increased in traffic that will result. Also everyone out here has 
septic systems. How will sewer service work for 700 new homes out here? 
100
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

356 03/27/2026 - 8:59am
Maryl
Comment
There is not sufficient road capacity to support: 700 new homes at Mordo Ranch. We have 3 other new 
items going in: Toll Bros 1200 homes, Trilogy expansion, Shopping Mall at 176th St. There is one accident 
per day on Rio Verde Dr as it is. When an accident occurs, things backup for miles. It happens often out 
here. 
100
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
357 03/27/2026 - 9:00am
Maryl
I am very concerned about this for same growth reasons. stated in point 3.
100
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
358 03/27/2026 - 9:00am
Maryl
Comment
I am very concerned about this for same reasons point 3. 
100
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
359 03/27/2026 - 9:05am
Maryl
Comment
Do not approve the re-zoning for Mordo Ranch at 156th St in Rio Verde Foothills please. It needs to stay 
rural zoning only.  Much of the land in is floodplain. New homeowners will need flood insurance. Massive 
washs flood often every year out here (they travel to the Rio Verde River 3 miles away). Dixieleta Road IS A 
WASH. They are talking about paving it????? 
100
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
369 03/27/2026 - 9:08pm
Tara Hutchinson 
Comment
I strongly oppose rezoning and development in the Rio Verde Foothills. There is limited water resources, 
reliance on septic systems, and inadequate road capacity for increased traffic. The area includes a natural 
watershed and designated floodplain, where development could disrupt drainage and increase flood risk to 
existing homes. This project would negatively impact wildlife habitat and introduce significant light and 
noise pollution. Most importantly, it would fundamentally change the rural, quiet character of the 
community that residents intentionally chose to make their home. 
100
4
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
360 03/27/2026 - 9:15am
Maryl
Comment
I / WE (RESIDENTS OF RIO VERDE FOOTHILLS) DO NOT WANT MORE DENSE ZOING IN RIO VERDE 
FOOTHILLS. KEEP IT RURAL ZONING PLEASE. WE HAVE BEEN THROUGH ENOUGHT OVER THE YEAR. WE 
INVESTED IN THIS AREA DUE TO THE RURAL ZONING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. (FOR SO MANY REASONS)
100
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
361 03/27/2026 - 9:26am
Keith Kronback
Question
So does this go for areas that are trying to Incorporate into there own  Municipalities. As Tonopah has been 
trying for the last 25yrs. I per there maps they have not done any legal survey just a meta & Bonds done by a 
lawyer that is not surveyor.   Here is a link to there Meta & Bonds https://incorporatetonopahaz.com in 
which they do not have permission any more from buck with in the 6 miles and still have not pulled there 
web site
123
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
375 03/28/2026 - 1:01pm
Deborah MacFarlane
Comment
Please keep our rural areas intact.   Prevent rezoning into lots under an acre and main rural-43 zoning!    
1
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
376 03/28/2026 - 2:24pm
Shaunda
Comment
Please do not change the zoning in the Rio Verde Foothills area. We already have water issues, traffic issues 
and not enough emergency services. We do not need high density subdivisions going in out here.  Please 
keep the R-43 zoning to maintain our 1 house per acre.  
100
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
377 03/28/2026 - 4:39pm
Lisa Kelley
Comment
Rural communities across Arizona are diminishing. At a minimum, the zoning for the unincorporated 
Maricopa County should be R-43--At a minimum!! The paving over the desert has increased temperatures 
and reduced significantly the natural habitat for native flora and fauna. Even more important-RAIN! Native 
trees help lower the temperature and create favorable conditions for cloud formation and precipitation. 
(see phys.org) Rural communities are essential to keeping a balanced environment. Any attempt to merge 
rural and urban would negatively impact the unincorporated area resulting in an urban only environment. 
14
4
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
378 03/28/2026 - 5:39pm
Jon King
Comment
NO to MorDo Development.
1
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
370 03/28/2026 - 6:33am
Carol
Comment
My husband Thomas & I reside on N 159th. We love our rural environment. Have horses & we oppose the the 
zoning for this Ranch. All homes approved for this area should keep the rural way of life & consider zoning 
that is compatible with current zoning statues. Water would be a huge concern affecting everyone
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
371 03/28/2026 - 8:59am
Michael Rotondo
Comment
The pressure on the water supply will decrease if growth is cut in the Rio Verde Foothills earlier. The area is 
already to densely populated and further growth will damage the area. 
192
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
372 03/28/2026 - 9:00am
Michael Rotondo
Comment
I have a well for a reason, I don't want to drink reclaimed water and the impurities that are not filtered out 
like prescription meds. 
192
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
373 03/28/2026 - 9:04am
Michael Rotondo
Comment
I moved out to this area for Scottsdale and Shea area to enjoy the quiet and the views not to have neighbors 
living on top of me. Let Scottsdale overbuild and litter the city with apartment complexes, leave us alone out 
here to enjoy AZ. 
46
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
374 03/28/2026 - 9:17am
Terra Wales
Comment
Pursuant to 1.4 - please do not approve the MorDo development. There is no infrastructure to 
accommodate the change of zoning that the developer is requesting. We are on wells, we have one way in 
and one way out, and we have already had many wildfire scares. This development would add to liability and 
possible fatalities because of the lack of existing infrastructure. The impact to wildlife, residents, horse 
properties, and public safety makes this an easy NO TO MORDO DEVELOPMENT.
109
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
384 03/29/2026 - 1:06pm
Linda Schlenker
Continuing to develop homes in Rio Verde Foothills when we are dry as a bone at here and don't have 
enough water for current residents, in addition wanting to rezone and cram hundreds of more houses on 
tiny lots is the worst sort of Fire and Emergency Management I have heard of.
86
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

385 03/29/2026 - 1:16pm
Linda Schlenker
Comment
Do not approve the continued development and rezoning in Rio Verde Foothills.  We do not have the water 
resources to accommodate 700 new homes, do not have the road capacity, it will fundamentally change 
the character of our community, and it will disrupt and change the drainage and flood risk in our area.  We 
are built around washes and flood zones.  The continued development puts our homes and community at 
risk.
100
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
386 03/29/2026 - 1:19pm
Linda Schlenker
Rezoning and allowing hundreds of small lots is in complete contradiction to 1.4.  We do not have the water, 
sewage, or roads to accommodate the rezoning or development of Mordo Ranch, especially if there was a 
need for a mass evacuation in case of wild fires which we are at great risk of.
109
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
387 03/29/2026 - 1:22pm
Linda Schlenker
WATER WATER WATER
150
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
379 03/29/2026 - 12:19pm
Linda Schlenker
Comment
Rezoning in Rio Verde Foothills to cram hundreds of small lots in a completely rural area that already does 
not have the water and roads to support it's current residents completely contradicts Land Use Policy #1.4
15
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
380 03/29/2026 - 12:24pm
Linda Schlenker
Comment
Rezoning Rio Verde Foothills to allow hundreds of small lots crammed into a rural area designed for 1+ acre 
lots puts the entire area in danger.  We have already had numerous wild fires in recent years.  We have one 
main road in and out - Dynamite. It would be catastrophic to add to the traffic needing to evacuate this area 
in case of an emergency.
16
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
381 03/29/2026 - 12:31pm
Linda Schlenker
Comment
Why is a rezoning in Rio Verde Foothills to allow hundreds of small lots being crammed in a rural area even 
being considered when this area has a known water shortage issue and there already isn't enough water for 
current residents?
26
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
382 03/29/2026 - 12:54pm
Linda Schlenker
Rio Verde Foothills must maintain its current zoning. The new proposed project to cram hundreds of small 
lots in this area is absolutely insane.  It does not fit with the character of the community at all and will 
permanently alter it.  We are a rural community of large, ranch lots filled with livestock and need to remain 
that way. It is why we all moved here and remain here and have a right to maintain our community. 
 
In addition, we have all experienced wildfires here over the last few years.  It is already too much to 
evacuate all of the homes and livestock out of the area with one main road in and out of the community. It 
would be extremely unsafe to add hundreds of new homes and potentially thousands of additional cars to 
the area that would need to evacuate. We do not have the roads to accommodate more cars for day to day 
traffic, never mind a mass evacuation. 
 
Most importantly, WATER.  The water crisis in our area is well known and well documented.  It is crazy that 
adding this many new homes and people to the area is even being considered when we do not have enough 
water for the current residents. 
 
Do not destroy our our rural community, one of the last of it's kind.  Do not further strain our water crisis.  Do 
not create a evacuation catastrophe when the wild fires hit again.
46
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
383 03/29/2026 - 12:59pm
Linda Schlenker
How are we in Rio Verde Foothills supposed to do that when the county is considering allowing rezoning to 
cram hundreds of small lots adding potentially thousands more people who will need water when we are 
struggling to have water for the people who already live here? Why would the county make our water, traffic, 
and emergency evacuation challenges near impossible to deal with?
74
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
388 03/29/2026 - 4:34pm
Amanda Monize 1
Comment
Maricopa county is very diverse considering its expansive square mile coverage. The county should 
consider the geographical, economic, environmental, and societal make up of each unincorporated area 
before changing zoning. There are areas, such as the Rio Verde Foothills, that are land locked with the Tonto 
Nation Forest to north and to the east. Increased populations due to high density zoning can place 
exponential burdens onto existing residents especially regarding safety. Please ensure that unincorporated 
areas continue to have plans unique that suit their areas. 
16
2
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
389 03/29/2026 - 4:38pm
Amanda Monize 1
Comment
There should also be support for existing wells. For example, if a subdivision is planned in an area with 
adjacent homes dependent on an the same aquifer as the subdivision, there must be plans to protect the 
existing wells before the subdivision is approved. 
18
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
390 03/29/2026 - 4:48pm
Amanda Monize 1
Comment
Consideration must be made to how a subdivision using groundwater will impact existing wells. Modeling 
should be provided to show impact of wells that are within 1 square mile of a subdivision planning to use 
the same aquifer. 
194
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
391 03/29/2026 - 4:53pm
Amanda Monize 1
Comment
Maricopa County should also support documented proof of limited impact of existing wells that are within 1 
square mile of a new development or subdivision.
198
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
392 03/29/2026 - 5:45pm
Jared Reisinger
Question
Given that 2010 to 2020 unincorporated growth had slowed to 8%, why are you projecting 20% growth going 
forward?
63
1
0 Acknowledgement
The reduced growth from 2010-2020 is 
a result of reductions in increasing 
population due to the Great Recession 
of 2008 and its lingering effects. Recent 
data and recent projections look to 
Maricopa County to continue its 
traditional high population growth as 
people move to the County.

394 03/30/2026 - 1:45pm
Andrew Yancey
Comment
Setbacks should be appropriate to the context and should be assumed to be substantial in all cases. 
 
Suggested revisions for Energy Policies 3.3 and below: 
 
Energy Policy #3.3: 
"Maricopa County supports the use of APPROPRIATE setbacks and buffers to residential uses from energy 
generation and/or energy storage facilities to prevent or lessen the impact from potential fires and other 
potential hazards." 
Energy Policy #3.5:  
"Maricopa County supports APPROPRIATE buffers and setbacks to ecological and riparian habitats found 
along borders of significant washes and riverbanks from energy generation and/or storage facilities." 
210
0
0 MBI Address
I believe the County would want to 
retain the current language for these 
Energy policies.
395 03/30/2026 - 1:53pm
Andrew Yancey
Comment
The current draft of the Municipal-Rural Influence Framework is confusing as applied to energy generation 
and storage projects and risks excluding appropriately sited projects.  The current framework generally 
identifies rural areas as suitable for electric generation facilities; however, it does not address municipal 
influence areas, which often include large, undeveloped parcels that may also be appropriate for such uses 
– especially as interim uses lasting approximately 30 years.  Clarifying that these utility scale facilities may 
be considered within both rural and municipal influence areas, where compatible with surrounding uses, 
would ensure flexibility and better reflect existing development patterns within the County.  Additionally, 
providing this clarity will also help avoid restrictive readings of this language that could trigger unnecessary 
plan amendments.  Some specific language revisions are proposed below: 
 
Last sentence of 2nd paragraph:  The Rural Service Area ACCOMMODATES rural land uses, AND ALLOWS 
FOR rural industrial or certain commercial land uses that would both not be considered part of the County’s 
Urban Growth Area. 
 
Add the following language:  CERTAIN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS, INCLUDING THE UTILITIES DESIGNATION, 
CAN OCCUR IN EITHER THE RURAL SERVICE AREA OR URBAN GROWTH AREA OF THE AREA OF MUNICIPAL 
INFLUENCE.
97
0
0 MBI Address
I believe the County would want to 
retain the current language detailing the 
allowed land uses in the Rural Service 
Area.
396 03/30/2026 - 1:54pm
Andrew Yancey
Comment
Similar to comment above, suggest the following language revision in Step 3:  Any unincorporated land 
falling in the Rural Service Area ACCOMMODATES rural land use designations.
98
0
0 MBI Address
I believe the County would want to 
retain the current language detailing the 
allowed land uses in the Rural Service 
Area.
397 03/30/2026 - 1:58pm
Andrew Yancey
Comment
Further clarification is needed to ensure cost-sharing requirements are proportionate to actual service 
demands and impacts.  This is of particular importance to renewable energy generation and energy storage 
facilities that do not strain public services due to lack of water, sewer, and transportation needs. 
The following proposed revisions help clarify that cost of development requirements should be 
proportionate:  
 
Cost of Development Policy #3.1: 
"Maricopa County supports new development CONTRIBUTING ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE COSTS 
OF infrastructure NECESSARY to support the demand for electric, water, sewer, and other services 
generated and necessitated by the development." 
 
Cost of Development Policy #3.2: 
"Maricopa County supports REQUIRING new development TO CONTRIBUTE ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE 
OF long-term maintenance costs associated with the infrastructure to support the demand for electric, 
water, sewer, and other services generated and necessitated by the development."  
221
0
0 MBI Address
I believe the County would want to 
retain the current language for these 
Cost of Development policies.

393 03/30/2026 - 10:24am
Valerie
Comment
To the Maricopa County Planning Commission,  
I am writing as a Rio Verde Foothills resident to formally oppose the rezoning request associated with the 
Mordo Ranch development proposal — approximately 700 residential units located between 156th and 
160th Street. My opposition is grounded in two critical concerns:  
 
1. WATER AVAILABILITY Rio Verde's water infrastructure is not equipped to support a development of this 
scale. This community has already experienced firsthand the consequences of water insecurity — residents 
were left without service when Scottsdale terminated its water hauling agreement in 2023. While steps 
have been taken since, the underlying supply constraints have not been resolved. Approving 700 additional 
units before the community has achieved long-term, sustainable water security is premature and 
irresponsible. Density approvals must follow infrastructure capacity — not precede it.  
 
2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND INCOMPATIBLE DENSITY Rio Verde is a low-density, rural-character 
community. Residents chose this area specifically because of its open space, limited traffic, and quiet 
neighborhoods. A 700-unit development fundamentally changes that character. The cumulative impact on 
roads, public services, school capacity, and quality of life for existing residents has not been adequately 
addressed. 
 
I urge the Commission to deny this rezoning request and require any future proposal to demonstrate: - 
Verified, long-term water supply commitments from a legally designated provider - Infrastructure studies 
showing roads and services can absorb the density - Community engagement that reflects the preferences 
of existing Rio Verde residents This community deserves growth that is responsible, measured, and 
sustainable — not density driven by developer timelines. 
73
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
402 03/30/2026 - 10:46pm
McCall Concannon
Comment
I strongly oppose the proposed development in Rio Verde. Our local neighborhood values peace and quiet, 
consistent water access, and a sustainable environment for our domesticated animals and wildlife. Please 
do not add any more homes to an already fragile ecosystem, nonetheless ones that will require rezoning of 
the serene and sacred desert! Our lots are one acre or more for a reason which preserves the desirability 
and sustainability of the entire area. Please do not approve this project which such devastating 
consequences, especially in an area already limited by singular road access. Further congestion is not 
prudent or safe given the wildfire risk and prevalent accidents. I urge the council to reject this proposal!
1
1
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
398 03/30/2026 - 2:29pm
Brian Smith
Comment
j
 
To the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department: 
 
As a resident of the Rio Verde Foothills (RVF), I am submitting this formal public comment on the 
Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Public Review Draft. I urge the County to ensure that the final 
adopted plan strictly maintains the rural, low-density designation of the RVF area, capping density at a 
maximum of one home per acre (Rural-43). 
 
Under Arizona law (A.R.S. § 11-814), all future rezonings must be consistent with and conform to the 
adopted comprehensive plan. It is imperative that Framework 2040's land use maps and policies explicitly 
prohibit high-density master-planned communities in this area, such as the active MorDo Ranch proposal 
(Cases CPA260001 & Z260002) which seeks to force up to 15 homes per acre into the middle of our 
community. 
 
Framework 2040 must recognize that high-density development does not fit our rural community due to 
several insurmountable constraints: 
 
No Proven Water Supply: The RVF community has a well-documented history of water scarcity, relying 
heavily on hauled water and domestic wells suffering from diminished yields. The area lacks the renewable 
water infrastructure required to support thousands of clustered homes. 
 
Infrastructure Deficits: Our rural perimeter roads are simply not built to handle the massive increase in daily 
traffic that urban-density development would generate. 
 
Septic Risk to Groundwater: Concentrating thousands of homes in an area without municipal sewer 
connections requires high-density septic usage, which poses a severe contamination risk to the underlying 
aquifer that existing residents rely upon. 
13
3
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

399 03/30/2026 - 4:17pm
Michael Scott Dosch
Comment
Required elements: 
1) Protection of current rural and semi rural parcels by retaining current zoning in particular R43 rules. 
Examples include the Rio Verde Foothills and North Scottsdale south of Cave Creek. 
2) Five year moratorium on new developments in the Rio Verde Foothills. Freeze the planned development 
west of Tonto Verde. 
3) Strict enforcement of night skies light pollution rules. 
4) No high density housing or reduced lot sizes in rural and semi rural areas 
5) Encourage high density housing in areas in proximity to major employers and existing or planned public 
transportation.
1
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
400 03/30/2026 - 4:21pm
Michael Scott Dosch
I strongly support Mr. Smith's recommendations and further recommend a five year moratorium on all new 
developments in the Rio Verde Foothills. 
Complete and existing approved plans then evaluate their impacts on water supply, public safety, night sky 
pollution, environmental harm and more.
13
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment
401 03/30/2026 - 4:23pm
Michael Scott Dosch
Comment
"Complete any existing approved plans.."
13
0
0 N/A to Comprehensive Plan
Rio Verde Foothills Rezoning Comment

1
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
cindy e <cindysellsrbon@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, March 3, 2026 2:09 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Less than a Month Left! Review and Comment on the Comprehensive Plan!
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
only comments come up. 
 
 No one asked us about chinese chip plants, data collection centers and neighborhoods in rural 
residential areas demonstrates arrogance and inability of people facing up tothe inability of these areas 
to provide additional water... 
 
the roads are 5-10 years behind the activities on land..so tired of this. 
 
On Tue, Mar 3, 2026 at 13:27 Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
View as a webpage 
  
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Marico pa County Logo

2
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan - Take Action Review the Plan. 
  
Maricopa County is undergoing an update to the County's Comprehensive Plan 
looking 10-20 years into the future. 
Comment on the Public Review Draft before  
March 30, 2026! 
View the Draft Plan & Provide Your Comments 
This is your chance to influence the future of Maricopa County. 
  
To learn more, visit 
www.Framework2040.com

3
x
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.

4
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Jamie and John Martin <johmie429@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, March 3, 2026 1:49 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Less than a Month Left! Review and Comment on the Comprehensive Plan!
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam 
 
I have I think that this plan looks really good. I just wanted to add a little bit about some quality 
management oversight.  Thank you for developing a long-range framework that 
addresses growth, infrastructure, and environmental stewardship. As Maricopa County 
continues to expand, air quality protection becomes increasingly important. Could you 
clarify what measurable air quality benchmarks (PM2.5, ozone, dust mitigation) are 
incorporated into the plan? Additionally, are there monitoring and mitigation triggers 
tied to transportation expansion and industrial zoning to ensure growth does not 
degrade public health outcomes 
 
 
View as a webpage 
  
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Marico pa County Logo

5
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan - Take Action Review the Plan. 
  
Maricopa County is undergoing an update to the County's Comprehensive Plan 
looking 10-20 years into the future. 
Comment on the Public Review Draft before  
March 30, 2026! 
View the Draft Plan & Provide Your Comments 
This is your chance to influence the future of Maricopa County. 
  
To learn more, visit 
www.Framework2040.com

6
x
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.

7
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Susan Bjork <bjorksvb@gmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, January 29, 2026 10:57 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Today: Release of Maricopa County’s Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan and 
Grand Virtual Meeting
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Thanks, Adam for sending.  I did rsvp earlier.   
 
Will this give me an update on the zoning? 
 
Thanks, 
Susan Bjork 
612-804-2860 
 
 
 
On Jan 29, 2026, at 9:19 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
wrote: 
  
  
<image003.png> 
  
Maricopa County is pleased to announce the release of the Framework 2040 
Comprehensive Plan Public Review Draft and Grand Virtual Event  
  
  
  
Take Action, Review the Plan! 
  
We invite all residents, landowners, business owners, and other stakeholders within 
unincorporated Maricopa County to attend the upcoming Grand Virtual Event tonight 
Thursday, January 29th from 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM to learn about the key updates included in 
the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Information will be provided during the Virtual 
Event on how to comment and submit feedback on the Draft Plan. 
  
Grand Virtual Meeting – Thursday, January 29, 2026 
  
The draft will be shared and discussed at a public meeting today Thursday, January 29th, 
2026. This marks the beginning of the 60-day review period when the Framework 2040

8
Comprehensive Plan Draft will be available for residents, stakeholders, agencies, and other 
members of the community to comment on and submit feedback. The update of the 
county’s Comprehensive Plan is vital as the document will serve as a roadmap for county-
level decision-making on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 
2040. 
  
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2026 
Time: 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM 
Location: Online (Webinar Link) 
  
RSVP for the virtual event 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes)  
  
The feedback gathered during this Grand Virtual Event and throughout the 60-day period 
will be carefully reviewed and used to inform and revise the final draft of the Comprehensive 
Plan as it heads towards consideration from the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. The 
Grand Virtual Event will also inform attendees of the anticipated dates for the public 
hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Board of Supervisors as part of 
the adoption process for the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 
 
For more information about the Maricopa County Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan and 
to stay informed about upcoming related events and sign up for email notifications, please 
visit www.Framework2040.com.

9
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
cindy e <cindysellsrbon@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, January 26, 2026 4:02 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: REMINDER: Maricopa County’s Comprehensive Plan - Public Review Draft Set for 
Release for Comment and Feedback at 1/29/26 Grand Virtual Event
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ok thats 180 degrees on how local city  council meetings or BNSF sales meetings held..excuse my 
weariness.   
Thank you. 
 
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 15:58 Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Hi Cindy, 
  
You will absolutely have an opportunity to comment at the event.   There is no voting taking place at the event, 
and nothing has been predecided.  We are holding the meeting to show the public where the draft of the plan is 
and show how people can comment directly on the draft. 
  
Thanks, 
Adam 
  
From: cindy e <cindysellsrbon@gmail.com>  
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 3:53 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: REMINDER: Maricopa County’s Comprehensive Plan - Public Review Draft Set for Release for Comment and 
Feedback at 1/29/26 Grand Virtual Event 
  
Adam why do you hold these ? Its all been predecided?? no way to comment at event ( not going to tell what i will say in advance??) .. Its like BNSF .. . going do as you please. On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11: 53 Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam. Cannon@ maricopa. gov > 
Adam why do you hold these ? Its all been predecided?? no way to comment at event ( not going to tell 
what i will say in advance??) .. 
Its like BNSF ... going do as you please.

10
  
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:53 Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
  
Maricopa County’s Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update – 
 
Public Review Draft Set for Release for Comment and Feedback 
  
  
  
Maricopa County, AZ – Maricopa County is pleased to announce the upcoming release of the 
Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Public Review Draft. The draft will be shared and discussed at a 
public meeting on Thursday, January 29th, 2026. This marks the beginning of the 60-day review period 
when the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft will be available for residents, stakeholders, 
agencies, and other members of the community to comment on and submit feedback. The update of 
the county’s Comprehensive Plan is vital as the document will serve as a roadmap for county-level 
decision-making on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 2040. 
  
The County adopted its current Comprehensive Plan back in 2016. In the ten years since then, new 
growth patterns and evolving industries, along with Arizona legal requirements, necessitate a broad 
and full update to ensure Maricopa County's continued development aligns with long-term community 
values. 
  
The Draft Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan looks to act as a guide for promoting the health, 
safety, and general welfare of Maricopa County, providing a basis to guide the development of both the 
natural and built environment while working to sustain and improve quality of life for residents of 
unincorporated Maricopa County. Most notably, the Plan implements a new approach that unifies the 
existing growth strategies of the unincorporated areas under a cohesive framework that allows for 
context-appropriate development while balancing the preservation of natural and rural landscapes. 
The Draft Plan does this through addressing various county-wide topics such as land use, 
transportation systems, parks and open spaces, water resources, energy, economic growth, 
environmental planning, and cost of development in a manner that reflects the values and priorities of 
residents within unincorporated Maricopa County.

11
We invite all residents, landowners, business owners, and other stakeholders within unincorporated 
Maricopa County to attend the upcoming Grand Virtual Event on Thursday, January 29th from 5:00 PM – 
6:00 PM to learn about the key updates included in the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 
Information will be provided during the Virtual Event on how to comment and submit feedback on the 
Draft Plan. 
  
GRAND VIRTUAL EVENT 
  
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2026
Time: 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM 
Location: Online (Webinar Link) 
  
RSVP for the virtual event 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes)  
  
The feedback gathered during this Grand Virtual Event and throughout the 60-day period will be 
carefully reviewed and used to inform and revise the final draft of the Comprehensive Plan as it heads 
towards consideration from the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. The Grand Virtual Event will 
also inform attendees of the anticipated dates for the public hearings before the Planning & Zoning 
Commission and the Board of Supervisors as part of the adoption process for the Framework 2040 
Comprehensive Plan. 
 
For more information about the Maricopa County Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan and to stay 
informed about upcoming related events and sign up for email notifications, please 
visit www.Framework2040.com.

12
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
cindy e <cindysellsrbon@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, January 26, 2026 3:53 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: REMINDER: Maricopa County’s Comprehensive Plan - Public Review Draft Set for 
Release for Comment and Feedback at 1/29/26 Grand Virtual Event
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Adam why do you hold these ? Its all been predecided?? no way to comment at event ( not going to tell 
what i will say in advance??) .. 
Its like BNSF ... going do as you please.  
 
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:53 Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
  
Maricopa County’s Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update – 
 
Public Review Draft Set for Release for Comment and Feedback 
  
  
  
Maricopa County, AZ – Maricopa County is pleased to announce the upcoming release of the 
Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Public Review Draft. The draft will be shared and discussed at a 
public meeting on Thursday, January 29th, 2026. This marks the beginning of the 60-day review period 
when the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft will be available for residents, stakeholders, 
agencies, and other members of the community to comment on and submit feedback. The update of 
the county’s Comprehensive Plan is vital as the document will serve as a roadmap for county-level 
decision-making on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 2040. 
  
The County adopted its current Comprehensive Plan back in 2016. In the ten years since then, new 
growth patterns and evolving industries, along with Arizona legal requirements, necessitate a broad and 
full update to ensure Maricopa County's continued development aligns with long-term community 
values.

13
  
The Draft Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan looks to act as a guide for promoting the health, safety, 
and general welfare of Maricopa County, providing a basis to guide the development of both the natural 
and built environment while working to sustain and improve quality of life for residents of 
unincorporated Maricopa County. Most notably, the Plan implements a new approach that unifies the 
existing growth strategies of the unincorporated areas under a cohesive framework that allows for 
context-appropriate development while balancing the preservation of natural and rural landscapes. The 
Draft Plan does this through addressing various county-wide topics such as land use, transportation 
systems, parks and open spaces, water resources, energy, economic growth, environmental planning, 
and cost of development in a manner that reflects the values and priorities of residents within 
unincorporated Maricopa County.   
  
We invite all residents, landowners, business owners, and other stakeholders within unincorporated 
Maricopa County to attend the upcoming Grand Virtual Event on Thursday, January 29th from 5:00 PM – 
6:00 PM to learn about the key updates included in the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 
Information will be provided during the Virtual Event on how to comment and submit feedback on the 
Draft Plan. 
  
GRAND VIRTUAL EVENT 
  
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2026
Time: 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM 
Location: Online (Webinar Link) 
  
RSVP for the virtual event 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes)  
  
The feedback gathered during this Grand Virtual Event and throughout the 60-day period will be carefully 
reviewed and used to inform and revise the final draft of the Comprehensive Plan as it heads towards 
consideration from the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. The Grand Virtual Event will also inform 
attendees of the anticipated dates for the public hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission 
and the Board of Supervisors as part of the adoption process for the Framework 2040 Comprehensive 
Plan.

14
For more information about the Maricopa County Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan and to stay 
informed about upcoming related events and sign up for email notifications, please 
visit www.Framework2040.com.

15
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Jamie and John Martin <johmie429@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, January 26, 2026 1:36 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
Re: REMINDER: Maricopa County’s Comprehensive Plan - Public Review Draft Set for 
Release for Comment and Feedback at 1/29/26 Grand Virtual Event
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam, 
 
Thank you again for taking the time to explain how the Comprehensive Plan functions 
and where enforcement and accountability currently occur. Your explanation was clear 
and helpful. 
 
I wanted to share why I keep coming back to these questions, not just in planning but 
across multiple County and State contexts. What I consistently see is that we tend to fix 
things reactively—after approvals are granted, after violations occur, and after issues 
have already become visible or systemic. 
 
Corrective action plans, measurement, quality assurance, and qualification or licensing 
controls are not extraordinary tools; in many modern public and regulated systems they 
are considered normal governance tools. When they are missing upstream, the same 
frameworks and decisions get reused repeatedly without a structured way to evaluate 
outcomes, identify root causes, or prevent the same problems from recurring. 
 
Your response confirms that, at the Comprehensive Plan level, those tools are 
intentionally deferred to downstream processes. That distinction is important, because it 
helps explain why issues are often addressed only after the fact rather than prevented 
through proactive feedback and correction. 
 
My interest—both here and more broadly—is in encouraging a shift toward making 
corrective action a standard, proactive approach, rather than something triggered only 
once something goes wrong. That kind of structure is what stops systemic issues from 
repeating across cycles and departments.

16
 
I appreciate your engagement and look forward to reviewing the draft when it is released 
and participating through the formal public review process. 
 
Best regards, 
Jamie Weinhauer 
602-403-4535 
 
 
 
On Jan 26, 2026, at 1:09 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Hi Jamie, 
  
Thank you for your interest in the plan.  We have not released the draft of the plan yet, but it will be 
available on Friday at www.framework2040.com. 
  
Please see answers to questions below: 
  
1. How will the County measure the effectiveness of the plan’s stated goals relative to 
identified risks? – Although it is called a plan, it is more a policy document to address 
growth and development reflecting the needs of various stakeholders. What you are 
thinking of is more akin to a a strategic plan.  The Comprehensive Plan is a tool that 
decision makers use when considering Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone 
Changes.   
2. What specific performance metrics will be used to determine whether those goals are 
being met? - Performance of the goals will not be measured numerically.  The goals are 
intentionally broad.  We have a strategy associated with growth called Urban Solutions 
(or services) for Urban Development.  An applicant for a rezoning will have to 
demonstrate that they have appropriate urban services and the ability to annex into a 
municipality if their development requires urban services in order to receive a 
recommendation of approval from planning staff, pending public comment. 
3. How will those metrics be collected, validated, and reported over time? – Please see the 
answer to question 2 above. 
4. When deviations or failures occur, what formal mechanism exists to document the issue, 
identify root cause, and ensure corrective action before problems become systemic? – As 
noted above, you are thinking of a plan that is more technical in nature than this 
document.  The Comprehensive Plan represents a vision for future growth that is 
purposefully broad and intended as a policy document.  Policy documents are not 
regulatory, and are therefore discretionary. 
5. If a complaint is raised regarding noncompliance with the plan, what is the enforcement or 
corrective process to ensure adherence, quality assurance, and accountability where 
applicable? – Maricopa County has a Code Compliance division that enforces the 
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.  The Comprehensive Plan is not zoning and a 
Comprehensive Plan Amendment confers no entitlement to develop land.  The only

17
thing that an amendment allows is for a property developer to seek a rezoning in 
accordance with the land use designation given by the amendment.  State law requires 
zone changes to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.   
  
With that said, if a zone change is approved, and the property is not developed in 
accordance with the zoning ordinance or the conditions of approval associated with 
the zone change, then Code Compliance will investigate the property for a violation.  If 
it is discovered there is a violation, the property owner will be sent a notice and order 
to comply.  If compliance is not achieved or completed, then there will be a hearing 
summons where a hearing officer will adjudicate the matter.  Further action includes 
liens on the property. 
  
Best regards, 
  
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for 
the next decade and beyond.  Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!  
  
   
  
From: Jamie and John Martin <johmie429@gmail.com>  
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 12:16 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: REMINDER: Maricopa County’s Comprehensive Plan - Public Review Draft Set for Release 
for Comment and Feedback at 1/29/26 Grand Virtual Event 
  
Hi Adam, Thank you for sharing the Fr amew ork 2040 update. I have a few clarification questions as part of the public review process. • How will the County measure the effectiveness of the plan’s stated goals relative to identified risks? • What 
Hi Adam, 
  
Thank you for sharing the Framework 2040 update. I have 
a few clarification questions as part of the public review 
process. 
  
• How will the County measure the effectiveness of the 
plan’s stated goals relative to identified risks? 
• What specific performance metrics will be used to 
determine whether those goals are being met?

18
• How will those metrics be collected, validated, and 
reported over time? 
• When deviations or failures occur, what formal 
mechanism exists to document the issue, identify root 
cause, and ensure corrective action before problems 
become systemic? 
• If a complaint is raised regarding noncompliance with the 
plan, what is the enforcement or corrective process to 
ensure adherence, quality assurance, and accountability 
where applicable? 
  
Understanding how the plan moves from vision to 
measurable, enforceable outcomes would be helpful. 
  
Thank you, 
Jamie Weinhauer 
602-403-4535 
  
  
  
  
On Jan 26, 2026, at 11:53 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) 
<Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
<image003.png> 
  
  
Maricopa County’s Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update – 
 
Public Review Draft Set for Release for Comment and Feedback 
  
  
  
Maricopa County, AZ – Maricopa County is pleased to announce the 
upcoming release of the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Public 
Review Draft. The draft will be shared and discussed at a public meeting on 
Thursday, January 29th, 2026. This marks the beginning of the 60-day review 
period when the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft will be available 
for residents, stakeholders, agencies, and other members of the community

19
to comment on and submit feedback. The update of the county’s 
Comprehensive Plan is vital as the document will serve as a roadmap for 
county-level decision-making on future growth, development, and 
preservation through the year 2040. 
  
The County adopted its current Comprehensive Plan back in 2016. In the ten 
years since then, new growth patterns and evolving industries, along with 
Arizona legal requirements, necessitate a broad and full update to ensure 
Maricopa County's continued development aligns with long-term community 
values. 
  
The Draft Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan looks to act as a guide for 
promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of Maricopa County, 
providing a basis to guide the development of both the natural and built 
environment while working to sustain and improve quality of life for residents 
of unincorporated Maricopa County. Most notably, the Plan implements a 
new approach that unifies the existing growth strategies of the 
unincorporated areas under a cohesive framework that allows for context-
appropriate development while balancing the preservation of natural and 
rural landscapes. The Draft Plan does this through addressing various 
county-wide topics such as land use, transportation systems, parks and 
open spaces, water resources, energy, economic growth, environmental 
planning, and cost of development in a manner that reflects the values and 
priorities of residents within unincorporated Maricopa County.   
  
We invite all residents, landowners, business owners, and other 
stakeholders within unincorporated Maricopa County to attend the 
upcoming Grand Virtual Event on Thursday, January 29th from 5:00 PM – 6:00 
PM to learn about the key updates included in the Framework 2040 
Comprehensive Plan. Information will be provided during the Virtual Event on 
how to comment and submit feedback on the Draft Plan. 
  
GRAND VIRTUAL EVENT 
  
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2026
Time: 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM 
Location: Online (Webinar Link) 
  
RSVP for the virtual event 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes)  
  
The feedback gathered during this Grand Virtual Event and throughout the 
60-day period will be carefully reviewed and used to inform and revise the 
final draft of the Comprehensive Plan as it heads towards consideration from 
the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. The Grand Virtual Event will also

20
inform attendees of the anticipated dates for the public hearings before the 
Planning & Zoning Commission and the Board of Supervisors as part of the 
adoption process for the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 
 
For more information about the Maricopa County Framework 2040 
Comprehensive Plan and to stay informed about upcoming related events 
and sign up for email notifications, please visit www.Framework2040.com.

21
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Jamie and John Martin <johmie429@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, January 26, 2026 12:16 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: REMINDER: Maricopa County’s Comprehensive Plan - Public Review Draft Set for 
Release for Comment and Feedback at 1/29/26 Grand Virtual Event
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam, 
 
Thank you for sharing the Framework 2040 update. I have a few 
clarification questions as part of the public review process. 
 
• How will the County measure the effectiveness of the plan’s stated 
goals relative to identified risks? 
• What specific performance metrics will be used to determine 
whether those goals are being met? 
• How will those metrics be collected, validated, and reported over 
time? 
• When deviations or failures occur, what formal mechanism exists 
to document the issue, identify root cause, and ensure corrective 
action before problems become systemic? 
• If a complaint is raised regarding noncompliance with the plan, 
what is the enforcement or corrective process to ensure adherence, 
quality assurance, and accountability where applicable? 
 
Understanding how the plan moves from vision to measurable, 
enforceable outcomes would be helpful. 
 
Thank you, 
Jamie Weinhauer 
602-403-4535

22
 
 
 
On Jan 26, 2026, at 11:53 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
wrote: 
  
<image003.png> 
  
  
Maricopa County’s Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update – 
 
Public Review Draft Set for Release for Comment and Feedback 
  
  
  
Maricopa County, AZ – Maricopa County is pleased to announce the upcoming release of 
the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Public Review Draft. The draft will be shared and 
discussed at a public meeting on Thursday, January 29th, 2026. This marks the beginning of 
the 60-day review period when the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft will be 
available for residents, stakeholders, agencies, and other members of the community to 
comment on and submit feedback. The update of the county’s Comprehensive Plan is vital 
as the document will serve as a roadmap for county-level decision-making on future 
growth, development, and preservation through the year 2040. 
  
The County adopted its current Comprehensive Plan back in 2016. In the ten years since 
then, new growth patterns and evolving industries, along with Arizona legal requirements, 
necessitate a broad and full update to ensure Maricopa County's continued development 
aligns with long-term community values. 
  
The Draft Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan looks to act as a guide for promoting the 
health, safety, and general welfare of Maricopa County, providing a basis to guide the 
development of both the natural and built environment while working to sustain and 
improve quality of life for residents of unincorporated Maricopa County. Most notably, the 
Plan implements a new approach that unifies the existing growth strategies of the 
unincorporated areas under a cohesive framework that allows for context-appropriate 
development while balancing the preservation of natural and rural landscapes. The Draft 
Plan does this through addressing various county-wide topics such as land use, 
transportation systems, parks and open spaces, water resources, energy, economic 
growth, environmental planning, and cost of development in a manner that reflects the 
values and priorities of residents within unincorporated Maricopa County.   
  
We invite all residents, landowners, business owners, and other stakeholders within 
unincorporated Maricopa County to attend the upcoming Grand Virtual Event on Thursday, 
January 29th from 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM to learn about the key updates included in the 
Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Information will be provided during the Virtual 
Event on how to comment and submit feedback on the Draft Plan.

23
GRAND VIRTUAL EVENT 
  
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2026
Time: 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM 
Location: Online (Webinar Link) 
  
RSVP for the virtual event 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes)  
  
The feedback gathered during this Grand Virtual Event and throughout the 60-day period 
will be carefully reviewed and used to inform and revise the final draft of the 
Comprehensive Plan as it heads towards consideration from the Maricopa County Board of 
Supervisors. The Grand Virtual Event will also inform attendees of the anticipated dates for 
the public hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Board of 
Supervisors as part of the adoption process for the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 
 
For more information about the Maricopa County Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan 
and to stay informed about upcoming related events and sign up for email notifications, 
please visit www.Framework2040.com.

24
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
DONNIE SKINNER <pkmeadows@aol.com>
Sent:
Friday, January 23, 2026 10:44 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Mr Cannon 
 
Thanks for the information,looking forward to reading the plan. 
 
 
Sent from my iPhone 
 
 
On Jan 23, 2026, at 9:16 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Good morning Mr. Skinner, 
  
It is still in draft form and that draft will be placed on the website for 60-days (calendar) for public 
review this Thursday. 
  
Thanks, 
Adam 
  
From: DONNIE SKINNER <pkmeadows@aol.com>  
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 9:14 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
  
Good mor ning Mr Cannon Is the Framework still in draft or completed? Sent fr om my iPhone On Jan 23, 2026, at 9: 03 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam. Cannon@ maricopa. gov > wrote:  Good morning Donnie, The Fr amew ork 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive 
Good morning Mr Cannon  
  
Is the Framework still in draft or completed? 
Sent from my iPhone 
 
 
 
On Jan 23, 2026, at 9:03 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) 
<Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Good morning Donnie,

25
  
The Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan will be available for 
review at www.framework2040.com on Thursday, January 29, 2026.  We will also 
hold a Grand Virtual Event that evening from 5pm to 6pm introducing the plan.  If 
you are interested in attending that meeting, please RSVP and register for the Zoom 
meeting at: https://framework2040.com/participate/. 
  
  
<image001.png> 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth 
and development for the next decade and beyond.  Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend 
meetings and be heard!  
  
From: Donnie Skinner <mail@framework2040.com>  
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 10:53 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
  
Wher e can we REVIEW the frame Work of the plan?                                                                                                                                                                                                
Where can we REVIEW the frame Work of the plan?

26
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Sent:
Friday, January 23, 2026 9:16 AM
To:
DONNIE SKINNER
Subject:
RE: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
Good morning Mr. Skinner, 
 
It is still in draft form and that draft will be placed on the website for 60-days (calendar) for public review this 
Thursday. 
 
Thanks, 
Adam 
 
From: DONNIE SKINNER <pkmeadows@aol.com>  
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 9:14 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
 
Good mor ning Mr Cannon Is the Framework still in draft or completed? Sent fr om my iPhone On Jan 23, 2026, at 9: 03 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam. Cannon@ maricopa. gov > wrote:  Good morning Donnie, The Fr amew ork 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Good morning Mr Cannon  
 
Is the Framework still in draft or completed? 
Sent from my iPhone 
 
On Jan 23, 2026, at 9:03 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Good morning Donnie, 
  
The Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan will be available for review at 
www.framework2040.com on Thursday, January 29, 2026.  We will also hold a Grand Virtual Event 
that evening from 5pm to 6pm introducing the plan.  If you are interested in attending that meeting, 
please RSVP and register for the Zoom meeting at: https://framework2040.com/participate/. 
  
  
<image001.png> 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn

27
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for 
the next decade and beyond.  Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!  
  
From: Donnie Skinner <mail@framework2040.com>  
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 10:53 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
  
Wher e can we REVIEW the frame Work of the plan?                                                                                                                                                                                                
Where can we REVIEW the frame Work of the plan?

28
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
DONNIE SKINNER <pkmeadows@aol.com>
Sent:
Friday, January 23, 2026 9:14 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Good morning Mr Cannon  
 
Is the Framework still in draft or completed? 
Sent from my iPhone 
 
 
On Jan 23, 2026, at 9:03 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Good morning Donnie, 
  
The Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan will be available for review at 
www.framework2040.com on Thursday, January 29, 2026.  We will also hold a Grand Virtual Event 
that evening from 5pm to 6pm introducing the plan.  If you are interested in attending that meeting, 
please RSVP and register for the Zoom meeting at: https://framework2040.com/participate/. 
  
  
<image001.png> 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for 
the next decade and beyond.  Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!  
  
From: Donnie Skinner <mail@framework2040.com>  
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 10:53 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
  
Wher e can we REVIEW the frame Work of the plan?                                                                                                                                                                                                
Where can we REVIEW the frame Work of the plan?

29
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Donnie Skinner <mail@framework2040.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, January 21, 2026 10:53 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Where can we REVIEW the frame Work of the plan?

30
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
McCann, Ryan <rmccann@swlaw.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, December 9, 2025 9:26 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Darren Gerard (PND); Griemsmann, Noel; Williams, Jeanette; Wood, Nick
Subject:
RE: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
Attachments:
SW Comments - 2040 Comp Plan Goals and Policies_12.9.25.pdf
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Good morning Adam, 
 
Hope you are doing well. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the “Goals and Policies” portion of the 
2040 Comprehensive Plan updates. On behalf of our client, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North 
America, Inc., we would like to offer the following comments on the draft “Goals and Policies” section for the 
2040 Comprehensive Plan updates. Upon review, please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions 
or need any clarification. 
 
We look forward to reviewing the full draft of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in the beginning of 2026. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
Ryan McCann, AICP
Urban Planner 
O: 602.382.6825
rmccann@swlaw.com
SNELL
& WILMER
swlaw.com | LinkedIn
 
 
 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 11:06 AM 
To: McCann, Ryan <rmccann@swlaw.com> 
Subject: RE: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 
 
[EXTERNAL] adam.cannon@maricopa.gov

31
Hi Ryan, 
 
I’m thinking sometime between August and September we will have a draft for review.  We are not sure yet if we are 
going to try and get it adopted by the end of the year or if we are thinking the first couple of months of 2026.  We will 
let you know.  Also, you and Noel are welcome to provide feedback on the draft goals and policies.  I know he 
wanted to provide some stronger language related to the proving grounds. 
 
Best regards, 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.  Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!  
 
Additionally, the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance is being updated. Visit MCZO Update to learn more and comment on changes to the ordinance. 
 
 
 
From: McCann, Ryan <rmccann@swlaw.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 9:22 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 
 
Good mor ning Adam, Hope you are doing well. Just wanted to check in with you regarding timing for the public review of the draft 2040 Comprehensive Pla n. Figure it is a little way out but when do you antici pate the consultant completing the 
 
Good morning Adam, 
 
Hope you are doing well. Just wanted to check in with you regarding Ɵming for the public review of the draŌ 
2040 Comprehensive Plan. Figure it is a liƩle way out but when do you anƟcipate the consultant compleƟng 
the draŌ for public review? 
 
Sincerely,  
 
Ryan McCann, AICP
Urban Planner 
O: 602.382.6825
rmccann@swlaw.com
SNELL
& WILMER 
swlaw.com | LinkedIn

32
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Debbie THOMPSON <mail@framework2040.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, December 2, 2025 10:06 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
We are wanting to watch a pnz meeting dec 4 and the post card said to go to this web site. But there 
is nothing here to connect to to watch on thurs. can u please help me figure out where to go to watch 
it virtually.  
Thank you

33
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Jennifer Waller (PRK)
Sent:
Monday, September 29, 2025 4:30 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
Adam, 
Thank you very much.  
 
This very topic has arisen in our internal discussions as we have been noticing an increase in the 
unauthorized use of motorized elements on the Maricopa Trail.  
 
I will forward this to our Trails Supervisor for review and have his team investigate the signage.  
 
Respectfully,  
 
 
 
Jennifer "Jenn" Waller
Director 
Parks & Recreation 
O: 602-506-9506 
C:  480-710-3965 
 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2025 9:32 AM 
To: Jennifer Waller (PRK) <Jennifer.WALLER@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: FW: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
 
Good morning Jenn, 
 
This is just an fyi. 
 
Adam 
 
From: Sean Gates <gseangates@gmail.com>  
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 4:59 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
 
Thank you for the quick response and contact info, sorry for the random lowercase and capitalization of words on my initial outreach - I promise I wasn’t yelling. :) I have reached out to ASLD online and haven’t heard anything but I will call 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Thank you for the quick response and contact info, sorry for the random lowercase and capitalization of 
words on my initial outreach - I promise I wasn’t yelling. :)

34
I have reached out to ASLD online and haven’t heard anything but I will call them tomorrow. 
I have attended recent Maricopa county planning meetings here in Anthem and there has been good 
discussion about retaining open space and trails for the residents in the north valley as so many building 
projects are under way.  
 
Sincerely, 
Sean Gates 
602-763-9662 
 
On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 4:37 PM Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Hi Sean, 
  
Thank you for sending this.  Motorized vehicles, including ATVs in flood control property and other property, is an 
issue the County is aware of and works to address on a regular basis.  However, as this land is controlled and 
owned by the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD), Maricopa County does not manage the trails unless there 
was a prior agreement to do so.   
  
I will forward your concern over to the Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department to inform them of the 
matter.  You will likely need to contact the ASLD directly to address the issues occurring on their property.  Their 
number is 602-542-4631.  
  
AZ State Parks and AZ Game and Fish handle the Off Highway Vehicles program.   
AZ State Parks: https://azstateparks.com/contact-us  
AZ Game and Fish: 602-942-3000 / Their main office is 5000 W. Carefree Highway, Phoenix, AZ 85086 
  
Best regards, 
  
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301

35
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov 
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade 
and beyond.  Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!  
  
Additionally, the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance is being updated. Visit MCZO Update to learn more and comment on changes to the ordinance. 
  
From: Sean gates <mail@framework2040.com>  
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 10:16 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
  
Hi, im a state trust land recreation permit holder , frequent hiker and mou ntain biker on daisy mountain trails and see many ot her hikers and mountain bikers using the trails. Recently, gas power ed dirt bikes have been riding on these trails 
Hi, im a state trust land recreation permit holder, frequent hiker and mountain biker on daisy 
mountain trails and see many other hikers and mountain bikers using the trails. Recently, gas 
powered dirt bikes have been riding on these trails (“No motorized use” signage has been 
vandalized and removed from trailheads in Anthem & New River) and have done considerable 
damage. These dirt bikes are entering trails through walking trails that are connected to 
neighborhoods surrounding this state trust land. I would like to see maricopa county make these 
trails a priority AND KEEP THEM SAFE FOR residents in the anthem & new river area. I would be 
happy to help in any way possible.  
Thanks,  
Sean Gates 602-763-9662

36
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Sean Gates <gseangates@gmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, September 25, 2025 4:59 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Thank you for the quick response and contact info, sorry for the random lowercase and capitalization of 
words on my initial outreach - I promise I wasn’t yelling. :) 
I have reached out to ASLD online and haven’t heard anything but I will call them tomorrow. 
I have attended recent Maricopa county planning meetings here in Anthem and there has been good 
discussion about retaining open space and trails for the residents in the north valley as so many building 
projects are under way.  
 
Sincerely, 
Sean Gates 
602-763-9662 
 
On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 4:37 PM Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Hi Sean, 
  
Thank you for sending this.  Motorized vehicles, including ATVs in flood control property and other property, is an 
issue the County is aware of and works to address on a regular basis.  However, as this land is controlled and 
owned by the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD), Maricopa County does not manage the trails unless there 
was a prior agreement to do so.   
  
I will forward your concern over to the Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department to inform them of the 
matter.  You will likely need to contact the ASLD directly to address the issues occurring on their property.  Their 
number is 602-542-4631.  
  
AZ State Parks and AZ Game and Fish handle the Off Highway Vehicles program.   
AZ State Parks: https://azstateparks.com/contact-us  
AZ Game and Fish: 602-942-3000 / Their main office is 5000 W. Carefree Highway, Phoenix, AZ 85086

37
Best regards, 
  
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade 
and beyond.  Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!  
  
Additionally, the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance is being updated. Visit MCZO Update to learn more and comment on changes to the ordinance. 
  
From: Sean gates <mail@framework2040.com>  
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 10:16 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
  
Hi, im a state trust land recreation permit holder , frequent hiker and mou ntain biker on daisy mountain trails and see many ot her hikers and mountain bikers using the trails. Recently, gas power ed dirt bikes have been riding on these trails 
Hi, im a state trust land recreation permit holder, frequent hiker and mountain biker on daisy 
mountain trails and see many other hikers and mountain bikers using the trails. Recently, gas 
powered dirt bikes have been riding on these trails (“No motorized use” signage has been 
vandalized and removed from trailheads in Anthem & New River) and have done considerable 
damage. These dirt bikes are entering trails through walking trails that are connected to 
neighborhoods surrounding this state trust land. I would like to see maricopa county make these 
trails a priority AND KEEP THEM SAFE FOR residents in the anthem & new river area. I would be 
happy to help in any way possible.  
Thanks,  
Sean Gates 602-763-9662

38
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Sean gates <mail@framework2040.com>
Sent:
Thursday, September 25, 2025 10:16 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Hi, im a state trust land recreation permit holder, frequent hiker and mountain biker on daisy mountain 
trails and see many other hikers and mountain bikers using the trails. Recently, gas powered dirt 
bikes have been riding on these trails (“No motorized use” signage has been vandalized and removed 
from trailheads in Anthem & New River) and have done considerable damage. These dirt bikes are 
entering trails through walking trails that are connected to neighborhoods surrounding this state trust 
land. I would like to see maricopa county make these trails a priority AND KEEP THEM SAFE FOR 
residents in the anthem & new river area. I would be happy to help in any way possible.  
Thanks,  
Sean Gates 602-763-9662

39
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Tom Ellsworth (PND)
Sent:
Monday, September 8, 2025 5:23 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Darren Gerard (PND); Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
RE: SCHOA Framework 2024 Feedback Tracker
No need to into great detail. I just wanted to ensure what they were relaying to the supervisor were the same things 
we were hearing from them. So in the future we will be able to show how we utilized the information to inform the 
plan. 
 
 
 
Tom Ellsworth 
Director 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-8557 
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 5:13 PM 
To: Tom Ellsworth (PND) <Tom.Ellsworth@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Darren Gerard (PND) <Darren.Gerard@Maricopa.Gov>; Rachel Applegate (PND) <Rachel.Applegate@Maricopa.Gov>
Subject: RE: SCHOA Framework 2024 Feedback Tracker 
 
Tom, 
 
This is generally consistent with what we have.  The SCHOA specific posts are certainly accurate with the 
exception that the number of likes have increased.  It’s harder to tell with the community posts as many were 
posted anonymously, but I generally believe she’s correct and probably left some off.  I also believe she asked the 
residents if they posted or not.  She’s undershooting the number of likes and comments some of the community 
posts have.  I’m working on getting the correct numbers. 
 
I will have MBI pull the text of the community posts for D4. 
 
Adam 
 
From: Tom Ellsworth (PND) <Tom.Ellsworth@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 4:40 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Darren Gerard (PND) <Darren.Gerard@Maricopa.Gov>; Rachel Applegate (PND) <Rachel.Applegate@Maricopa.Gov>
Subject: FW: SCHOA Framework 2024 Feedback Tracker 
 
Adam, 
 
I received the following FYI from Scott.  Please review to see if this is consistent with what we have.

40
 
 
Tom Ellsworth 
Director 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-8557 
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
 
From: Scott Isham <Scott.Isham@Maricopa.Gov>  
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 4:26 PM 
To: Tom Ellsworth (PND) <Tom.Ellsworth@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: FW: SCHOA Framework 2024 Feedback Tracker 
 
FYI 
 
From: Lisa Gray <SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org>  
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 3:50 PM 
To: Debbie Lesko <debbie@debbielesko.com> 
Cc: Scott Isham <Scott.Isham@Maricopa.Gov>; Debra Lesko <Debbie.Lesko@maricopa.gov>; Bill Leal (DOT) 
<Bill.Leal@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: SCHOA Framework 2024 Feedback Tracker 
 
Hi Debbie, Following up from our phone conversation last week, attached is a SCHOA comment tracker based on input from Sun City residents concerning issues during the Framew ork 2040 outreach. SCHOA used issues that are brought up often to start 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Hi Debbie, 
 
Following up from our phone conversation last week, attached is a SCHOA comment tracker based on input 
from Sun City residents concerning issues during the Framework 2040 outreach. SCHOA used issues that are 
brought up often to start the discussion with Sun City residents. We posted these and then encouraged 
residents to add their own issues and comments to the Maricopa County Framework 2040 comment wall.   
 
The first portion of the tracker shows the issue, the text of what we posted and then how many comments 
and likes we got for it. 
 
The second portion of the tracker are those issues that were posted by individuals, and again how many 
comments and likes were contributed to each post. I don’t have the comments included in this but I’m sure 
Maricopa County has this information. We believe that the majority of these comments were made by Sun 
City residents. 
 
Also attached is the stakeholder questionnaire that SCHOA completed for the Zoning Ordinance review. 
 
I’m sending both to you so you can see the issues that are important to Sun City. These are issues that SCHOA 
hears about consistently.  
 
Let me know if you have any questions.

41
 
 
Lisa Gray 
General Manager 
Sun City Home Owners AssociaƟon (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General Office 
623-242-7992 - Direct Line 
Email: SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org 
 
Office Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa

42
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Tom Ellsworth (PND)
Sent:
Monday, September 8, 2025 4:40 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Darren Gerard (PND); Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
FW: SCHOA Framework 2024 Feedback Tracker
Attachments:
SCHOA Framework 2040 Wall Comment Tracker.xlsx; Online Form Submittal: Maricopa 
County Zoning Ordinance Update – Stakeholder Questionnaire
Adam, 
 
I received the following FYI from Scott.  Please review to see if this is consistent with what we have. 
 
 
 
Tom Ellsworth 
Director 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-8557 
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
 
From: Scott Isham <Scott.Isham@Maricopa.Gov>  
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 4:26 PM 
To: Tom Ellsworth (PND) <Tom.Ellsworth@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: FW: SCHOA Framework 2024 Feedback Tracker 
 
FYI 
 
From: Lisa Gray <SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org>  
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 3:50 PM 
To: Debbie Lesko <debbie@debbielesko.com> 
Cc: Scott Isham <Scott.Isham@Maricopa.Gov>; Debra Lesko <Debbie.Lesko@maricopa.gov>; Bill Leal (DOT) 
<Bill.Leal@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: SCHOA Framework 2024 Feedback Tracker 
 
Hi Debbie, Following up from our phone conversation last week, attached is a SCHOA comment tracker based on input from Sun City residents concerning issues during the Framew ork 2040 outreach. SCHOA used issues that are brought up often to start 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Hi Debbie, 
 
Following up from our phone conversation last week, attached is a SCHOA comment tracker based on input 
from Sun City residents concerning issues during the Framework 2040 outreach. SCHOA used issues that are 
brought up often to start the discussion with Sun City residents. We posted these and then encouraged 
residents to add their own issues and comments to the Maricopa County Framework 2040 comment wall.

43
The first portion of the tracker shows the issue, the text of what we posted and then how many comments 
and likes we got for it. 
 
The second portion of the tracker are those issues that were posted by individuals, and again how many 
comments and likes were contributed to each post. I don’t have the comments included in this but I’m sure 
Maricopa County has this information. We believe that the majority of these comments were made by Sun 
City residents. 
 
Also attached is the stakeholder questionnaire that SCHOA completed for the Zoning Ordinance review. 
 
I’m sending both to you so you can see the issues that are important to Sun City. These are issues that SCHOA 
hears about consistently.  
 
Let me know if you have any questions.  
 
 
 
Lisa Gray 
General Manager 
Sun City Home Owners AssociaƟon (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General Office 
623-242-7992 - Direct Line 
Email: SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org 
 
Office Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa

44
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
McCann, Ryan <rmccann@swlaw.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, July 15, 2025 9:22 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Good morning Adam, 
 
Hope you are doing well. Just wanted to check in with you regarding Ɵming for the public review of the draŌ 
2040 Comprehensive Plan. Figure it is a liƩle way out but when do you anƟcipate the consultant compleƟng 
the draŌ for public review? 
 
Sincerely,  
 
Ryan McCann, AICP
Urban Planner 
O: 602.382.6825
rmccann@swlaw.com
SNELL
& WILMER
swlaw.com | LinkedIn

45
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>
Sent:
Wednesday, May 28, 2025 12:46 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
We truly appreciate that!  Ok, we can use this and still link people to the activities. 
 
Thank you so very much. 
 
Best, 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 12:45 PM 
To: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Subject: RE: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity 
 
It is not posted to our website as we made that just for you.  We can post it though once we begin our marketing 
activities for the Round 2 activity.  That will occur in the next couple of weeks or so. 
 
Thanks, 
Adam

46
From: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>  
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 12:42 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: RE: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity 
 
Adam, thank you again for sending this! We want to be sure we are highlighting the county so I also wanted to see if this is posted on your Website, or if I use this content, wher e you would prefer I send our readers? Thank you so much! Best, 
 
Adam, thank you again for sending this!  We want to be sure we are highlighting the county so I also wanted to see 
if this is posted on your Website, or if I use this content, where you would prefer I send our readers? 
 
Thank you so much! 
 
Best, 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 2:56 PM 
To: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Cc: Lisa Gray <SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org>; bill.leal@maricopa.gov 
Subject: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity 
 
Good afternoon Beth, 
 
Please see attached guide for instructions on how to complete the Round 2 survey activity on the website.  Let us 
know if you need anything else. 
 
Thanks! 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292

47
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!

48
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>
Sent:
Wednesday, May 28, 2025 12:42 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Adam, thank you again for sending this!  We want to be sure we are highlighting the county so I also wanted to see 
if this is posted on your Website, or if I use this content, where you would prefer I send our readers? 
 
Thank you so much! 
 
Best, 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 2:56 PM 
To: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Cc: Lisa Gray <SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org>; bill.leal@maricopa.gov 
Subject: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity 
 
Good afternoon Beth, 
 
Please see attached guide for instructions on how to complete the Round 2 survey activity on the website.  Let us 
know if you need anything else.

49
 
Thanks! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!

50
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>
Sent:
Wednesday, May 28, 2025 9:55 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Lisa Gray; Bill Leal (DOT)
Subject:
RE: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thank you so much! 
 
Warm Regards, 
 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 2:56 PM 
To: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Cc: Lisa Gray <SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org>; bill.leal@maricopa.gov 
Subject: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity 
 
Good afternoon Beth, 
 
Please see attached guide for instructions on how to complete the Round 2 survey activity on the website.  Let us 
know if you need anything else.

51
Thanks! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!

52
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Lisa Gray <SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org>
Sent:
Tuesday, May 27, 2025 2:12 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND); Beth Lucas
Cc:
Bill Leal (DOT)
Subject:
RE: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thanks, Adam.  
 
 
 
 
Lisa Gray 
General Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General Office 
623-242-7992 - Direct Line 
Email: SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org 
 
Office Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 2:56 PM 
To: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Cc: Lisa Gray <SchoaGM@suncityhoa.org>; bill.leal@maricopa.gov 
Subject: Instruction Guide for Round 2 Virtual Activity 
 
Good afternoon Beth, 
 
Please see attached guide for instructions on how to complete the Round 2 survey activity on the website.  Let us 
know if you need anything else.

53
Thanks! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!

54
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>
Sent:
Thursday, May 22, 2025 11:48 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Framework 2040
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thank you! 
 
 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 11:46 AM 
To: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Subject: RE: Framework 2040 
 
We can do it and its already been sent to the consultant.  They will let me know if it’s a problem. 
 
We’ll send it both to you and Lisa. 
 
Thanks, 
Adam

55
From: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 11:14 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: RE: Framework 2040 
 
Hi Adam! I don’t want to give you extra work or costs – I just wanted to check in to see if there was anything in particular that would be good to promote. Would it be better if I worked with Lisa for an update and checked to make 
 
Hi Adam! 
 
I don’t want to give you extra work or costs – I just wanted to check in to see if there was anything in particular that 
would be good to promote. 
Would it be better if I worked with Lisa for an update and checked to make sure it is accurate? 
 
 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 10:46 AM 
To: bill.leal@maricopa.gov 
Cc: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Subject: RE: Framework 2040 
 
Will do Bill.   
 
Beth - I’ll have our consultant whip something up in terms of an instruction guide and get that over to you.  All of 
the round 1 activities (survey, idea wall and interactive map) will be available until the draft plan is released which 
would be in late summer/early fall.  Thank you for your support on this project. 
 
Best regards,

56
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
 
 
From: Bill Leal (DOT) <Bill.Leal@Maricopa.Gov>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 9:04 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Subject: FW: Framework 2040 
 
Hi Adam, 
 
Can you answer Beth’s question below please. 
 
Thank you, 
Bill 
 
From: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 8:58 AM 
To: Bill Leal (DOT) <Bill.Leal@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: Framework 2040 
 
Good mor ning Bill! The article you sent fits fine, and I can use it. I did have a question as I work on an update for Lisa to review , on Framework 2040. From the Website, it looks like stage two breaks out the four categories covered by the 
 
Good morning Bill! 
 
The article you sent fits fine, and I can use it.  I did have a question as I work on an update for Lisa to review, on 
Framework 2040.  From the Website, it looks like stage two breaks out the four categories covered by the 
Comprehensive Plan.  Do you have any pdfs on this second step to be sure I guide people through how to set their 
ratings and respond?  And I assume they can still take the survey, comment on the wall, etc? 
 
Thank you again for your help!  I hope you have a lovely holiday weekend planned! 
 
Best, 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org

57
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa

58
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>
Sent:
Thursday, May 22, 2025 11:14 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Framework 2040
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam! 
 
I don’t want to give you extra work or costs – I just wanted to check in to see if there was anything in particular that 
would be good to promote. 
Would it be better if I worked with Lisa for an update and checked to make sure it is accurate? 
 
 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 10:46 AM 
To: bill.leal@maricopa.gov 
Cc: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Subject: RE: Framework 2040 
 
Will do Bill.

59
Beth - I’ll have our consultant whip something up in terms of an instruction guide and get that over to you.  All of 
the round 1 activities (survey, idea wall and interactive map) will be available until the draft plan is released which 
would be in late summer/early fall.  Thank you for your support on this project. 
 
Best regards, 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
 
 
From: Bill Leal (DOT) <Bill.Leal@Maricopa.Gov>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 9:04 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Subject: FW: Framework 2040 
 
Hi Adam, 
 
Can you answer Beth’s question below please. 
 
Thank you, 
Bill 
 
From: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 8:58 AM 
To: Bill Leal (DOT) <Bill.Leal@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: Framework 2040 
 
Good mor ning Bill! The article you sent fits fine, and I can use it. I did have a question as I work on an update for Lisa to review , on Framework 2040. From the Website, it looks like stage two breaks out the four categories covered by the 
 
Good morning Bill! 
 
The article you sent fits fine, and I can use it.  I did have a question as I work on an update for Lisa to review, on 
Framework 2040.  From the Website, it looks like stage two breaks out the four categories covered by the 
Comprehensive Plan.  Do you have any pdfs on this second step to be sure I guide people through how to set their 
ratings and respond?  And I assume they can still take the survey, comment on the wall, etc? 
 
Thank you again for your help!  I hope you have a lovely holiday weekend planned! 
 
Best, 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager

60
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa

61
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>
Sent:
Thursday, May 22, 2025 11:06 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND); Bill Leal (DOT)
Subject:
RE: Framework 2040
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thank you so very much! 
 
Best, 
 
 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 10:46 AM 
To: bill.leal@maricopa.gov 
Cc: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Subject: RE: Framework 2040 
 
Will do Bill.   
 
Beth - I’ll have our consultant whip something up in terms of an instruction guide and get that over to you.  All of 
the round 1 activities (survey, idea wall and interactive map) will be available until the draft plan is released which 
would be in late summer/early fall.  Thank you for your support on this project.

62
 
Best regards, 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
 
 
From: Bill Leal (DOT) <Bill.Leal@Maricopa.Gov>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 9:04 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org> 
Subject: FW: Framework 2040 
 
Hi Adam, 
 
Can you answer Beth’s question below please. 
 
Thank you, 
Bill 
 
From: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 8:58 AM 
To: Bill Leal (DOT) <Bill.Leal@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: Framework 2040 
 
Good mor ning Bill! The article you sent fits fine, and I can use it. I did have a question as I work on an update for Lisa to review , on Framework 2040. From the Website, it looks like stage two breaks out the four categories covered by the 
 
Good morning Bill! 
 
The article you sent fits fine, and I can use it.  I did have a question as I work on an update for Lisa to review, on 
Framework 2040.  From the Website, it looks like stage two breaks out the four categories covered by the 
Comprehensive Plan.  Do you have any pdfs on this second step to be sure I guide people through how to set their 
ratings and respond?  And I assume they can still take the survey, comment on the wall, etc? 
 
Thank you again for your help!  I hope you have a lovely holiday weekend planned! 
 
Best, 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351

63
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa

64
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Bill Leal (DOT)
Sent:
Thursday, May 22, 2025 9:04 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Beth Lucas
Subject:
FW: Framework 2040
Hi Adam, 
 
Can you answer Beth’s question below please. 
 
Thank you, 
Bill 
 
From: Beth Lucas <marketingmanager@suncityhoa.org>  
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 8:58 AM 
To: Bill Leal (DOT) <Bill.Leal@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: Framework 2040 
 
Good mor ning Bill! The article you sent fits fine, and I can use it. I did have a question as I work on an update for Lisa to review , on Framework 2040. From the Website, it looks like stage two breaks out the four categories covered by the 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Good morning Bill! 
 
The article you sent fits fine, and I can use it.  I did have a question as I work on an update for Lisa to review, on 
Framework 2040.  From the Website, it looks like stage two breaks out the four categories covered by the 
Comprehensive Plan.  Do you have any pdfs on this second step to be sure I guide people through how to set their 
ratings and respond?  And I assume they can still take the survey, comment on the wall, etc? 
 
Thank you again for your help!  I hope you have a lovely holiday weekend planned! 
 
Best, 
 
Beth Lucas 
Marketing Manager 
Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) 
10401 West Coggins Dr. 
Sun City, AZ  85351 
623-974-4718 - General OƯice 
623-242-8535 - Direct Line 
Email: MarketingManager@suncityhoa.org 
 
OƯice Hours: 
Monday - Thursday, 9:00am - 3:00pm 
Friday, 9:00am - Noon 
Social Media: @suncityhoa

65

66
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Dave Haddox <dhaddox@hiringsolutions.net>
Sent:
Saturday, May 10, 2025 6:30 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - 
TOMORROW
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Thank you Adam. 
Have a great weekend! 
Dave 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 1:23 PM 
To: Dave Haddox <dhaddox@hiringsolutions.net> 
Subject: RE: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - TOMORROW 
 
Good afternoon Dave, 
 
Thank you.  We appreciate you and materials from the meeting will be available soon at 
www.framework2040.com. 
 
Best regards, 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
 
 
From: Dave Haddox <dhaddox@hiringsolutions.net>  
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2025 7:49 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: RE: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - TOMORROW 
 
A meeting with a customer came up, I will not be able to attend. My apologies. Dave Haddox From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam. Cannon@ maricopa. gov> Sent: T hursday, May 8, 2025 5:  13 PM To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam. Cannon@ maricopa. gov> Cc:  
 
A meeting with a customer came up, I will not be able to attend. 
My apologies.

67
Dave Haddox 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2025 5:13 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - TOMORROW 
 
 
View as a webpage 
 
 
 
 
REMINDER:

68
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
In-person Event Tomorrow! 
 
Framework 2040 Maricopa County 
Comprehensive Plan Takes Shape. 
As part of ongoing efforts to ensure community voices shape this planning 
process, Maricopa County residents are invited to participate in the second 
round of outreach meetings for the development of the Framework 2040 - 
Comprehensive Plan. Review the meeting option below and join the 
conversation! 
Each scheduled meeting will offer an overview of the community feedback that 
has been collected to date and provide interactive activities to explore how 
collected input should be incorporated into the draft plan. 
  
In-person event 
District 4 
Date: Friday, May 9, 2025 
Time: 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM 
Location: Sundial Recreation Center (Auditorium) 
14801 N. 103rd Ave, Sun City, AZ 85351

69
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
 
 
Maricopa County  |  602-506-7642  |  District4@maricopa.gov 
301 W Jefferson St  |  Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
x 
 
 
   
. 
 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
White Seal

70
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Barbara Elmgren <belmgren94301@yahoo.com>
Sent:
Friday, May 9, 2025 1:23 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - 
TOMORROW
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Thank you for letting me know that.  
 
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone 
 
On Friday, May 9, 2025, 1:21 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Good afternoon Barbara, 
  
That’s ok.  If you would like to watch the meeting, Sun City recorded the meeting and it will be 
available on YouTube soon.  We appreciate you. 
  
Best regards, 
  
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn

71
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for 
the next decade and beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
  
  
  
From: Barbara Elmgren <belmgren94301@yahoo.com>  
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 8:06 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - 
TOMORROW 
  
I am so sorry but my plans have changed and I have to attend to another issue so I will not be able to attend this meeting this mor ning. You guys are doing a great job! Barbara Elmgren Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Thursday, May 8, 2025, 
I am so sorry but my plans have changed and I  have to attend  to another issue so I will 
not be able to attend this meeting this morning.  You guys are doing a great job! 
  
Barbara Elmgren  
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone 
  
On Thursday, May 8, 2025, 5:13 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
wrote: 
  
View as a webpage 
  
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Marico pa County Logo

72
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County District 4 Supervisor Debbie Lesko
  
REMINDER:
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
In-person Event Tomorrow! 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Framework 2040 - Comprehensive Plan Rnd 2 Banner
 
Framework 2040 Maricopa County 
Comprehensive Plan Takes Shape.

73
As part of ongoing efforts to ensure community voices shape this planning 
process, Maricopa County residents are invited to participate in the second 
round of outreach meetings for the development of the Framework 2040 - 
Comprehensive Plan. Review the meeting option below and join the 
conversation! 
Each scheduled meeting will offer an overview of the community feedback that 
has been collected to date and provide interactive activities to explore how 
collected input should be incorporated into the draft plan. 
  
In-person event 
District 4 
Date: Friday, May 9, 2025 
Time: 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM 
Location: Sundial Recreation Center (Auditorium) 
14801 N. 103rd Ave, Sun City, AZ 85351 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
  
 
Maricopa County  |  602-506-7642  |  District4@maricopa.gov 
301 W Jefferson St  |  Phoenix, AZ 85003 
  
x
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Micro so ft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
   
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
White Seal

74
.

75
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Kathleen O’Mara <komara@sbcglobal.net>
Sent:
Friday, May 9, 2025 12:30 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - 
TOMORROW
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Thank you for the Sun City presentation today - really enjoyed getting educated as to how this 
Comprehensive Plan works. 
Kathy O’Mara 
Sun City resident for 8 years 
 
 
On May 8, 2025, at 5:13 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
  
View as a webpage 
  
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Marico pa County Logo

76
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County District 4 Supervisor Debbie Lesko
  
REMINDER:
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
In-person Event Tomorrow! 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Framework 2040 - Comprehensive Plan Rnd 2 Banner
 
Framework 2040 Maricopa County 
Comprehensive Plan Takes Shape. 
As part of ongoing efforts to ensure community voices shape this planning 
process, Maricopa County residents are invited to participate in the second

77
round of outreach meetings for the development of the Framework 2040 - 
Comprehensive Plan. Review the meeting option below and join the 
conversation! 
Each scheduled meeting will offer an overview of the community feedback that 
has been collected to date and provide interactive activities to explore how 
collected input should be incorporated into the draft plan. 
  
In-person event 
District 4 
Date: Friday, May 9, 2025 
Time: 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM 
Location: Sundial Recreation Center (Auditorium) 
14801 N. 103rd Ave, Sun City, AZ 85351 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
  
 
Maricopa County  |  602-506-7642  |  District4@maricopa.gov 
301 W Jefferson St  |  Phoenix, AZ 85003 
  
x
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Micro so ft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
   
 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
White Seal

78
.

79
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Barbara Elmgren <belmgren94301@yahoo.com>
Sent:
Friday, May 9, 2025 8:06 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - 
TOMORROW
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
I am so sorry but my plans have changed and I  have to attend  to another issue so I will not be able to 
attend this meeting this morning.  You guys are doing a great job! 
 
Barbara Elmgren  
 
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone 
 
On Thursday, May 8, 2025, 5:13 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
View as a webpage 
  
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Marico pa County Logo

80
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County District 4 Supervisor Debbie Lesko
  
REMINDER:
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
In-person Event Tomorrow! 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Framework 2040 - Comprehensive Plan Rnd 2 Banner
 
Framework 2040 Maricopa County 
Comprehensive Plan Takes Shape.

81
As part of ongoing efforts to ensure community voices shape this planning 
process, Maricopa County residents are invited to participate in the second 
round of outreach meetings for the development of the Framework 2040 - 
Comprehensive Plan. Review the meeting option below and join the 
conversation! 
Each scheduled meeting will offer an overview of the community feedback that 
has been collected to date and provide interactive activities to explore how 
collected input should be incorporated into the draft plan. 
  
In-person event 
District 4 
Date: Friday, May 9, 2025 
Time: 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM 
Location: Sundial Recreation Center (Auditorium) 
14801 N. 103rd Ave, Sun City, AZ 85351 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
  
 
Maricopa County  |  602-506-7642  |  District4@maricopa.gov 
301 W Jefferson St  |  Phoenix, AZ 85003 
  
x
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
White Seal

82
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Micro so ft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
   
 
.

83
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Dave Haddox <dhaddox@hiringsolutions.net>
Sent:
Thursday, May 8, 2025 7:49 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - 
TOMORROW
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
A meeting with a customer came up, I will not be able to attend. 
My apologies. 
Dave Haddox 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2025 5:13 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - TOMORROW 
 
 
View as a webpage

84
 
REMINDER: 
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
In-person Event Tomorrow! 
 
Framework 2040 Maricopa County 
Comprehensive Plan Takes Shape. 
As part of ongoing efforts to ensure community voices shape this planning 
process, Maricopa County residents are invited to participate in the second

85
round of outreach meetings for the development of the Framework 2040 - 
Comprehensive Plan. Review the meeting option below and join the 
conversation! 
Each scheduled meeting will offer an overview of the community feedback that 
has been collected to date and provide interactive activities to explore how 
collected input should be incorporated into the draft plan. 
  
In-person event 
District 4 
Date: Friday, May 9, 2025 
Time: 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM 
Location: Sundial Recreation Center (Auditorium) 
14801 N. 103rd Ave, Sun City, AZ 85351 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
 
 
Maricopa County  |  602-506-7642  |  District4@maricopa.gov 
301 W Jefferson St  |  Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
x 
 
 
   
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
White Seal

86
.

87
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Bud Meador <budmeador@gmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, May 8, 2025 6:24 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: REMINDER: District 4 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Workshop - 
TOMORROW
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Will attend, Adam.  Looking forward to seeing you, Matey. 
Bud 
Sent from my iPhone 
 
 
On May 8, 2025, at 5:13 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
  
View as a webpage 
  
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Marico pa County Logo

88
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County District 4 Supervisor Debbie Lesko
  
REMINDER:
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
In-person Event Tomorrow! 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Framework 2040 - Comprehensive Plan Rnd 2 Banner
 
Framework 2040 Maricopa County 
Comprehensive Plan Takes Shape. 
As part of ongoing efforts to ensure community voices shape this planning 
process, Maricopa County residents are invited to participate in the second

89
round of outreach meetings for the development of the Framework 2040 - 
Comprehensive Plan. Review the meeting option below and join the 
conversation! 
Each scheduled meeting will offer an overview of the community feedback that 
has been collected to date and provide interactive activities to explore how 
collected input should be incorporated into the draft plan. 
  
In-person event 
District 4 
Date: Friday, May 9, 2025 
Time: 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM 
Location: Sundial Recreation Center (Auditorium) 
14801 N. 103rd Ave, Sun City, AZ 85351 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
  
 
Maricopa County  |  602-506-7642  |  District4@maricopa.gov 
301 W Jefferson St  |  Phoenix, AZ 85003 
  
x
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Micro so ft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
   
 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
White Seal

90
.

91
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Ksenia Kerentseva <kkerentseva@gatewayairport.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, May 7, 2025 11:35 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam, 
 
I hope you are doing well! 
 
My name is Ksenia Kerentseva, I am the Airport Planner at Mesa Gateway Airport.  
 
I had a couple questions regarding the ongoing Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan. While I understand that this plan 
will primarily focus on the unincorporated areas, are there any plans to update the land use around Mesa Gateway 
Airport within the incorporated areas? Additionally, it was mentioned that the county islands are considered 
unincorporated but have different considerations; could you please elaborate on that?  
 
Thank you! 
 
Ksenia Kerentseva 
Airport Planner 
Engineering & Facilities 
Mesa Gateway Airport Authority 
5835 S Sossaman Rd 
Mesa, AZ 85212-6014 
Office: (480) 988-7649 
kkerentseva@gatewayairport.com 
www.gatewayairport.com  
  
  
  
  
 
  
Please be advised that our office hours are Monday - Thursday 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. We are closed Fridays.

92
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
kelley dwyer <kelley403@hotmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, April 24, 2025 6:33 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Reminder: Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan - Grand Virtual 
Meeting - Tonight
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
HI Adam:  
 
This is Mr. Kelley Dwyer coming to you from Chandler.  
 
Thanks for hosting the program tonight.  
 
Keep me on the mailing list for any news about Maricopa County.   
 
Postal mailing address is:  P.O. Box 220 Chandler 85244 
 
Kelley Dwyer  
Chandler 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 11:21 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Reminder: Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan - Grand Virtual Meeting - Tonight 
 
Good morning: 
 
Thank you for RSVPing to attend the Grand Virtual Meeting for the Framework 2040 Maricopa County 
Comprehensive Plan.  The meeting starts tonight at 5:00 p.m.  Please use the zoom link below to access the 
meeting once it starts. 
 
Grand Virtual Meeting 
Date: Thursday, April 24, 2025 
Zoom Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84632894194 
Time: 5:00pm – 6:30pm 
 
Thank you for attending! 
 
Maricopa County Planning and Development

93
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
HARVEY KUNTZ <harv.claudette@cox.net>
Sent:
Thursday, April 24, 2025 4:42 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Reminder: Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan - Grand Virtual 
Meeting - Tonight
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Ahh Jeez, Adam just had a grand kid situation just now & have to pass.   
Harv K 
Sent from my iPhone 
 
 
On Apr 24, 2025, at 11:21 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
wrote: 
  
Good morning: 
  
Thank you for RSVPing to attend the Grand Virtual Meeting for the Framework 2040 Maricopa 
County Comprehensive Plan.  The meeting starts tonight at 5:00 p.m.  Please use the zoom link 
below to access the meeting once it starts. 
  
Grand Virtual Meeting 
Date: Thursday, April 24, 2025 
Zoom Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84632894194 
Time: 5:00pm – 6:30pm 
  
Thank you for attending! 
  
Maricopa County Planning and Development

94
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Mary Thompson Ebel <rainydays47@gmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, April 24, 2025 10:57 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Mary Ebel
Subject:
Re: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Good morning.   I take it that the zoom meeting for today is cancelled?  I never got an email on this. 
 
Thank. you  
 
 
On Apr 10, 2025, at 1:36 PM, Mary Thompson Ebel <rainydays47@gmail.com> wrote: 
 
Thanks 
 
 
On Apr 10, 2025, at 12:42 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) 
<Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
 
Good afternoon Mary, 
  
I apologize that you are getting that issue.  We are working on it and will correct it, 
but you are confirmed for the Grand Virtual Meeting on April 24th.  I will send an e-
mail reminder to all the registrants prior to the meeting. 
  
Best regards, 
  
<image001.png> 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov 
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth 
and development for the next decade and beyond.  
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!

95
From: Mary Ebel <mail@framework2040.com> 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2025 12:01 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
  
Hello. I submitted the form to join the april 24 grand virtual meeting but the confirmation I receive after submitting is for a meeting in Novemb er 2025. I tried 3 times and got the sam e November 2025 confirmation date. I only see meetings in 
Hello.  I submitted the form to join the april 24 grand virtual meeting but 
the confirmation I receive after submitting is for a meeting in November 
2025.   I tried 3 times and got the same November 2025 confirmation 
date.   I only see meetings in april and may 2025.  Nothing for november.

96
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Joe Wittman <mail@framework2040.com>
Sent:
Thursday, April 24, 2025 10:23 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Resident of Sun City here.  Is the May 9 District4 meeting an appropriate venue  to  discuss the 
homeless and or Drug Addicts who are a daily staple  in Sun City?  I would like to see a change in 
laws so that they can not spend all day hanging around.  Its not good for us or for them.  Thank you.

97
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Mary Ebel <mail@framework2040.com>
Sent:
Thursday, April 10, 2025 12:01 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Hello.  I submitted the form to join the april 24 grand virtual meeting but the confirmation I receive 
after submitting is for a meeting in November 2025.   I tried 3 times and got the same November 2025 
confirmation date.   I only see meetings in april and may 2025.  Nothing for november.

98
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Quinne Daoust <qdaoust@bfsolaw.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, March 19, 2025 11:36 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Framework 2040 Updates
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thanks for this information, Adam. We'll continue to keep an eye out for those meeting dates this spring, 
and look forward to engaging with the County as the Comp Plan framework continues to take shape.  
 
Best, 
Quinne 
 
Quinne Daoust, Esq.  
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC  
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210  
Phoenix, Arizona 85018  
Office: 602.888.7864  
Cell: 480.510.8682 
  
   
 
   
Visit us at www.bfsolaw.com  
   
The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential.  It is intended only to be read by 
the individual or entity named above or their designee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at 602.888.7860 or 
by fax at 602.888.7856 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.  Thank you. 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 11:20 AM 
To: Quinne Daoust <qdaoust@bfsolaw.com> 
Subject: RE: Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Framework 2040 Updates  
  
Good morning Quinne, 
  
We will be announcing another round of meetings very soon.  Meetings will take place from mid-to-late April 
through early May; however, I cannot announce the dates at this moment.   
At this time, we’re looking at having a public review draft in autumn September - November though it may be 
earlier than that depending upon the direction of the plan.   
  
Thanks,

99
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
  
  
  
From: Quinne Daoust <qdaoust@bfsolaw.com>  
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:53 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Framework 2040 Updates 
  
Mr. Cannon, I hope this email finds you well. Just wanted to check in on thest atus of the 2040 Comp Plan update outreach. Will there be any m ore public scoping meetings this spring? Do you hav e a rough timeline of when a comp plan draft will 
Mr. Cannon,  
  
I hope this email finds you well. Just wanted to check in on thestatus of the 2040 Comp Plan update 
outreach. Will there be any more public scoping meetings this spring? Do you have a rough timeline of 
when a comp plan draft will be available for review? Thanks in advance for your help! 
  
Best, 
Quinne Daoust 
  
  
Quinne Daoust, Esq.  
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC  
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210  
Phoenix, Arizona 85018  
Office: 602.888.7864  
Cell: 480.510.8682 
  
   
 
   
Visit us at www.bfsolaw.com  
   
The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential.  It is intended only to be read by 
the individual or entity named above or their designee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at 602.888.7860 or 
by fax at 602.888.7856 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.  Thank you.

100
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Quinne Daoust <qdaoust@bfsolaw.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:53 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Framework 2040 Updates
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Mr. Cannon,  
 
I hope this email finds you well. Just wanted to check in on thestatus of the 2040 Comp Plan update 
outreach. Will there be any more public scoping meetings this spring? Do you have a rough timeline of 
when a comp plan draft will be available for review? Thanks in advance for your help! 
 
Best, 
Quinne Daoust 
 
 
Quinne Daoust, Esq.  
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC  
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210  
Phoenix, Arizona 85018  
Office: 602.888.7864  
Cell: 480.510.8682 
  
   
 
   
Visit us at www.bfsolaw.com  
   
The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential.  It is intended only to be read by 
the individual or entity named above or their designee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at 602.888.7860 or 
by fax at 602.888.7856 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.  Thank you.

101
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Richard Peel (EMG)
Sent:
Friday, March 14, 2025 11:26 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND); Frank McWilliams (EMG)
Cc:
Joseph Cruz (EMG); Donovan Bowling (EMG)
Subject:
RE: Email 1 of 3: Wildfire Planning, Emergency Response Discussions in the North 
Phoenix/New River area
Adam, 
 
Sorry for the late response. It’s been hectic.  
 
I’ll have our all hazards section reach out and see when this meeting will occur with Daisy Mountain.  
 
Rich  
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 2:32 PM 
To: Frank Mcwilliams (EMG) <frank.mcwilliams@maricopa.gov>; Richard Peel (EMG) <Richard.Peel@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: FW: Email 1 of 3: Wildfire Planning, Emergency Response Discussions in the North Phoenix/New River area 
 
Good afternoon Frank and Richard, 
 
I hope you are well.  One of our former employees who is now a community advocate in New River/Desert Hills 
sent me a series of e-mails on emergency management comments.  I’m sure you may be aware of some of what I 
am sending, but she is a friend and so I am passing it along.  One of the e-mails is trying to coordinate a meeting 
with the North Valley Outdoor Network and other agencies about a pathway.   
 
Let me know if you have any questions. 
 
Thanks! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
 
   
 
From: Eileen Baden <Ebaden@badeneco.com>  
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 12:40 PM

102
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Email 1 of 3: Wildfire Planning, Emergency Response Discussions in the North Phoenix/New River area 
 
Hi Adam, Recently, Phoenix Council members Stark & Robinson and Maricopa County Supervisor Br ophy McGee had a public meeting on emergency response. Bel ow are some thoughts I wanted to share with you, but please also a dd these to the Framew ork 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd 
Hi Adam, 
 
Recently, Phoenix Councilmembers Stark & Robinson and Maricopa County Supervisor Brophy McGee had a public 
meeƟng on emergency response. Below are some thoughts I wanted to share with you, but please also add these to the 
Framework 2040 comments, if possible.  
 
1. American Planning AssociaƟon Wildfire Planning Documents: I met Phoenix Fire ExecuƟve Assistant Chief Tim 
Kreis at the meeƟng. I shared two American Planning AssociaƟon (APA) wildland fire planning documents with 
Phoenix fire and planning departments. I will send them in separate emails. Could you share them with your 
department and the Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management? 
 
2. “Pigtail” extensions, building codes & fire improvements: At the community meeƟng, a MCDEM representaƟve 
menƟoned a “pigtail” extension that goes on to exterior buildings, to make it easy for a generator to hook up. 
One bill discussed at the Planners’ Day was one that would restrict ciƟes/towns/counƟes from adding any 
addiƟonal requirements beyond the InternaƟonal Building Code (it sounds like it’s dead, but I think sƟll 
important to watch out for). These types of “pigtail” extensions might be good to require on community 
buildings or senior housing, for example, or other places where large numbers of vulnerable populaƟons may 
live.  
 
3. New River Pathway West of I-17: David Hondula, Chief Heat Officer for Phoenix, menƟoned he is most 
concerned about the stability of our power grid. If we lost power, there could be mass evacuaƟons. That’s why 
we’re talking a pathway offset from the north side of New River Road (from I-17 to Carefree Hwy) to serve as a 
firebreak and improve access for emergency responders. Peoria is developing that area, so an even larger 
populaƟon is coming. I saw TSMC is a $65 billion investment. A mulƟ-use path to serve as a firebreak may be a 
valuable, cost-efficient investment. It could be a 10-mile scenic mulƟ-use path that provides connecƟons to the 
BLM Black Canyon NaƟonal Scenic Trail and the Emery Henderson Trailhead, and possibly to Lake Pleasant 
Regional Park in the future. New River Road was closed in this area just a few years ago due a 844 acre+ wildland 
fire. hƩps://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-wildfires/2019/08/22/new-river-fire-north-phoenix-
40-contained-aŌer-scorching-844-acres/2087486001/ Daisy Mountain Fire Department said they use New River 
Road all the Ɵme, and they would respond first as they are closer, but technically this area is within the Phoenix 
Fire District. Daisy Mountain Fire menƟoned they have large vehicles and do not want to hit anyone on a bicycle. 
Phoenix Fire Chief Tim Kreis also shared that Frank Bayless is the North District Commander for Phoenix Fire 
Department, who oversees North Phoenix and WUI areas.   
 
4. New River Pathway East of I-17: A pathway east of the I-17 on the north side of New River Road could also 
provide a safe place for kids to wait for the bus. There was a child in criƟcal condiƟon aŌer being struck on New 
River Road waiƟng for the bus just the other week: hƩps://www.abc15.com/traffic/child-hit-by-vehicle-near-
35th-avenue-and-new-river-road. Here is an arƟcle from a youth bicyclist fatality aŌer being struck by a vehicle 
in PrescoƩ Valley in November. hƩps://www.12news.com/video/news/local/arizona/prescoƩ-valley-teens-
death-renews-calls-for-safer-pathways-for-pedestrians-bicyclists/75-c9dee85f-9730-4fa7-a5c5-34e8c7103f9d 
 
5. Daisy Mountain and Fire Access: I recently met with the Daisy Mountain Fire & Medical Department and 
received their full support on the pathway and trail improvements in the New River/Anthem/Desert 
Hills/Phoenix area. I was told they respond to 4x the amount of wildland fires compared to structure fires. Also, 
aŌer the Bela Flor development is built, there will be only about a ¼ mile opening remaining on the west side of

103
Daisy Mountain. That access point will be criƟcal not only for public trail access, but for firefighters as well. 
Otherwise, it can take 30+ minutes to get around the mountain.  
 
6. Improved Access Anthem/Desert Hills/New River: There was an I-17 South closure from Carefree Hwy to Happy 
Valley this weekend. Coming from New River, Google Maps didn’t pick up on the closure unƟl I was in Anthem, 
and then I had to turn around and drive around Daisy Mountain. What would have taken me 5 minutes from 
Anthem to get to Desert Hills Drive/New River Road took almost 40 minutes – this is not good if there was a 
wildfire or another emergency. I heard the delay was hours long and residents felt trapped in their homes. We 
need access from Anthem to Desert Hills/New River Road, this is very important for public safety. 
 
7. Backup Water Source Near New River: We also may want to consider a backup water source near the I-17 and 
New River. Currently, Daisy Mountain Fire fills up their water trucks preƩy far south! (I completed a Community 
Emergency Response Team 20-hr FEMA training with the department last year and learned this).  
 
8. Table Mesa Road as a Firebreak: I also heard MCDOT was planning to improve Table Mesa Road as a firebreak 
30 years ago. This might be something to consider due to the increased wildfire concerns.  
 
9. Support from AZ Public and mulƟple benefits of pathways as improved access and firebreaks: I highly 
recommend watching “Fire in Paradise” on Neƞlix. AƩached is a image of the pathways they are building that 
can withhold the weight of emergency vehicles to improve access and serve as firebreaks. I spoke with someone 
from the Alta trail design firm and they are doing these types of projects in Oregon because of bad wildfires. 
Also aƩached are results showing public support for pathway and trails from the AZ State Parks – Statewide 
Outdoor Comprehensive Outdoor RecreaƟon Plan.  
 
Please reach out with any quesƟons. 
 
Thank you for your Ɵme,  
 
Eileen Baden, AICP 
President, Friends of Daisy Mountain Trails  
Bureau of Land Management, AZ Resource Advisory Council Member  
 
All views expressed are my own  
 
(FYI - I’m using my work email due to file size.)

104
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com>
Sent:
Monday, March 3, 2025 5:30 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: EXTERNAL: FW: Email 2 of 3: 2005 American Planning Association Report on 
Planning for Wildfires
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thanks for sharing. Probably getting a little too specific for a Comp Plan with some of these recommendations, but 
the broader context is noted and we will look closer at her specific trail notes. 
 
MK  
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 2:08 PM 
To: Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com> 
Subject: EXTERNAL: FW: Email 2 of 3: 2005 American Planning Association Report on Planning for Wildfires 
 
EXTERNAL EMAIL 
 
fyi 
 
From: Eileen Baden <eileenbaden@gmail.com>  
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 1:28 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Email 2 of 3: 2005 American Planning Association Report on Planning for Wildfires 
 
Hi Adam, I tried to send from my Outlook email but it didn't go through, hopefully this one does. Frank Bayless with Phoenix Fire just called me. He is going to review the documents I’m sending and speak with Daisy Mountain Fire. We’re hoping 
 
Hi Adam, 
 
I tried to send from my Outlook email but it didn't go through, hopefully this one does. 
  
Frank Bayless with Phoenix Fire just called me. He is going to review the documents I’m sending and speak with Daisy 
Mountain Fire. We’re hoping to get a field visit set up with the North Valley Outdoor Network (NVON) to review the 
pathway idea west of I-17 along New River Road to Carefree Hwy. Jonathan McKelvey, who works on trails for Maricopa 
County Parks, is involved in our NVON trail connectivity group and will be invited. Let me know if anyone else from the 
County in Planning, Transportation, or Emergency Management might be interested.  
  
Attached is the 2005 American Planning Association Report on Planning for Wildfires.  
  
Below are some examples from this document (PDF page 11). The valve in swimming pools to allow use by firefighters 
seems like a good idea.

105
 
  
Thank you, 
Eileen Baden, AICP 
 
908-797-9727 
eileenbaden@gmail.com

106
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com>
Sent:
Monday, March 3, 2025 5:24 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: EXTERNAL: FW: Email 3 of 3: 2019 American Planning Association Report on 
Planning the Wildland-Urban Interface
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thanks for passing along. Michael Baker actually assisted Cal Fire with a lot of their post fire responses, so I think 
we are well positioned to evaluate this topic in alignment with the County’s role and responsibilities.  
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 2:09 PM 
To: Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com> 
Subject: EXTERNAL: FW: Email 3 of 3: 2019 American Planning Association Report on Planning the Wildland-Urban 
Interface 
 
EXTERNAL EMAIL 
 
fyi 
 
From: Eileen Baden <Ebaden@badeneco.com>  
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 1:26 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Email 3 of 3: 2019 American Planning Association Report on Planning the Wildland-Urban Interface 
 
Hi Adam, Attached is the 2019 Ameri can Planning Association Report on Pla nning the Wildland-Ur ban Interface. This document was prepar ed after the bad wildfire season in 2018, including the Ca mp Fire, which was the subject of the documentary 
 
Hi Adam, 
 
AƩached is the 2019 American Planning AssociaƟon Report on Planning the Wildland-Urban Interface.  
 
This document was prepared aŌer the bad wildfire season in 2018, including the Camp Fire, which was the subject of the 
documentary “Fire in Paradise”.  
 
Please share these two resources with MCDEM and reach out with any quesƟons.  
 
Thank you,  
 
Eileen Baden, AICP 
Principal Planner 
Baden Eco, LLC 
 
ebaden@badeneco.com 
480-712-1910

107

108
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com>
Sent:
Monday, March 3, 2025 5:17 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: EXTERNAL: FW: Comprehensive Plan Update - Phase 2 Community Outreach 
Meetings – Scheduling & Venue Considerations
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Adam, 
 
Thanks for all the Surge 2 scheduling information. Steven is already working through some logistical issues with 
date, time, and space availability across the various venues. Appears to all be manageable at the moment, but we 
will share more as we confirm more hard dates. 
 
Best, 
Matt 
 
 
Matthew Klyszeiko | Department Manager - Planning 
Phoenix Plaza Tower II, 2929 N. Central Avenue, 8th Floor | Phoenix, AZ 85012 | [O] 602-798-7513 | [M] 
(480) 250-6829 | [F] 602-467-2201 
matthewk@mbakerintl.com | www.mbakerintl.com   
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
 
   
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 4:46 PM 
To: Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com> 
Subject: EXTERNAL: FW: Comprehensive Plan Update - Phase 2 Community Outreach Meetings – Scheduling & Venue 
Considerations 
 
EXTERNAL EMAIL 
 
April 16th or May 1st for D3 
 
From: Page Patterson Gonzales (BOS) <Page.Gonzales@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 4:45 PM 
To: Tom Ellsworth (PND) <Tom.Ellsworth@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Carissa Cortez (BOS) <carissa.cortez@maricopa.gov>; Darcy Kober (OOC) <Darcy.Kober@Maricopa.Gov>; Darren 
Gerard (PND) <Darren.Gerard@Maricopa.Gov>; Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Update - Phase 2 Community Outreach Meetings – Scheduling & Venue Considerations

109
Hi Tom, 
Sorry for the delay. Kate would like to be at an outreach meeting for D3. The Anthem Civic Building is a good 
location. Thanks! She said she can do April 16th or 30th. Or May 1st. Have a look and let us know which one of those 
work so we can block it off.  
Thanks!  
 
 
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Marico pa County Logo
 
Page Patterson Gonzales 
Chief of Staff 
Board of Supervisors 
District 3 
301 West Jefferson Street Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-7074  
E: page.gonzales@maricopa.gov 
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn 
 
 
 
From: Tom Ellsworth (PND) <Tom.Ellsworth@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 2:29 PM 
To: Scott Isham <Scott.Isham@Maricopa.Gov>; Page Patterson Gonzales (BOS) <Page.Gonzales@maricopa.gov>; Pete 
Mains (BOS) <peter.mains@maricopa.gov>; John Gomez (BOS) <john.gomez@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Darcy Kober (OOC) <Darcy.Kober@Maricopa.Gov>; Darren Gerard (PND) <Darren.Gerard@Maricopa.Gov>; Adam 
Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Update - Phase 2 Community Outreach Meetings – Scheduling & Venue Considerations
 
Chiefs, 
I wanted to follow up on my previous email regarding the scheduling of our Phase 2 community outreach 
meetings for the County’s Comprehensive Plan update. As we move forward with finalizing details, we 
will begin scheduling the meetings based on the proposed dates and locations. 
If your office has any preferred dates or venue preferences, please let us know as soon as possible so we 
can incorporate your input before confirming logistics. We want to ensure the selected date, time, and 
location best serve your district’s needs. 
Once the meetings are scheduled, we will follow up to inform you of the final date, time, and location for 
your district. Please feel free to reply with any thoughts or let me know if a brief discussion would be 
helpful. We appreciate your guidance and look forward to your feedback. 
Thank you, 
 
 
Tom Ellsworth 
Director 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-8557 
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn

110
 
 
From: Tom Ellsworth (PND)  
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2025 11:25 AM 
To: Scott Isham <SCOTT.ISHAM@Maricopa.Gov>; Page Patterson Gonzales (BOS) <Page.Gonzales@maricopa.gov>; Pete 
Mains (BOS) <peter.mains@maricopa.gov>; John Gomez (BOS) <john.gomez@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Darcy Kober (OOC) <Darcy.Kober@Maricopa.Gov>; Darren Gerard (PND) <DARREN.GERARD@Maricopa.Gov>; Adam 
Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Comprehensive Plan Update - Phase 2 Community Outreach Meetings – Scheduling & Venue Considerations 
 
Chiefs: 
I wanted to make you aware that we are beginning to schedule our Phase 2 community outreach 
meetings as part of the County’s Comprehensive Plan update. As we did for Phase 1 in November and 
December, we will be hosting one countywide virtual meeting and one in-person community meeting in 
each of the five districts to ensure broad community engagement. 
The purpose of these meetings is to review findings from the first round of community workshops and 
gather input on land use and growth area alternatives through scenario planning and other activities. The 
feedback received will help inform the plan’s goals and policies and shape the final stage of plan 
development. 
For potential meeting dates, we are targeting the last two weeks of April and the first full week of May, 
with meetings scheduled on a weekday evening (Monday through Thursday). The potential dates are 
within these weekly ranges: 
 
April 14 – 18 
 
April 28 – May 2 
 
May 5 – 9 
For venues, we are considering the following locations: 
 
D1 – AZ College Prep High School or Castille High School (Chandler) 
 
D2 – Skyline High School, Smith Junior High School, or Red Mountain High School (Mesa) 
 
D3 – Anthem Civic Building (Anthem) 
 
D4 – Palm Ridge Recreation Center (Sun City West) 
 
D5 – Betty Fairfax High School (Laveen) 
We would appreciate any input from your office on a specific preferred date or location for the meeting in 
your District. We want to ensure the selected date, time, and venue best serve the community and align 
with any district priorities. 
Please let me know if you have any thoughts or if a brief discussion would be helpful to go over any 
considerations. Your input will help guide our outreach efforts as we finalize these details. 
Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your feedback.

111
 
 
 
Tom Ellsworth 
Director 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-8557 
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn

112
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Bud Meador <budmeador@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 26, 2025 11:55 PM
To:
Dr. Sally PRICKETT; Kathryn King; David Hunter; Ralph Johnson; Rosemary Dougherty; 
Darwin Nelson; Gary Cohen; Dennis Horvath; dennis hanzel; Lou Mancuso; Jolene 
Piaskowski; Rodney Bertram; Michael LUKACHIE; d runner; Allan Lenefsky; Lisa Gray; 
Dean Folk; Sharon Martin; Rudy Grom; Jane Meador; Sharon HETTICK; Aletha Delamo; 
Peggy Sue Kruger; Roxy Hurd McGough; Dawn Exarhopoulis; Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
EL MIRAGE ROAD EXTENSION/PEORIA AIR  PORT/DEER VALLEY ROAD CONNECTION 
WITH LOOP 303
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Ladies and Gentlemen:  I attended a presentation this evening presented by Maricopa County, 
ADOT, and the City of Peoria.  I spoke with several engineers, county and state representatives, and 
one of Peoria’s City Councilmen re the subjects & their potential impact on SCW.  All good news, as 
follows: 
A.  The Peoria air port is now a dead issue.  Not going to happen for a myriad of reasons, not the 
least of which is Luke AFB was not in favor of it for air space reasons.  This may be old news to 
some.   
B.  The El Mirage Rd expansion takes place north of the 303, and connects the 303 to Jomax Road to 
the north.  Initial construction will have two lanes in either direction, a bike lane on both sides, and a 
separated side walk on both sides.  It will eventually be  expanded to three lanes in both directions 
with a 40 mph speed limit.  Final design approval is roughly one year out, with ground breaking 
planned for late ‘26/early ‘27.  Flood control conduits under the road will be 10 in number measuring 
12’x 12’, each.  Impact on SCW is envisioned to be a slight increase in traffic on El Mirage Road 
between Bell Road and the 303. 
C.  The rumor of Maricopa County connecting Deer Valley Road to the 303 remains a rumor.  Every 
planner and engineer with whom I spoke this evening - and, I asked them all about this matter - 
replied in the negative.   
 
The event was nicely presented in the Lake Pleasant Elementary School, and all participants were 
friendly, outgoing, energetic, and helpful.  So, again, good news for us re this project. 
 
More to follow as info becomes available.  Semper Fidelis! 
 
Bud Meador 
 
 
 
Sent from my iPhone

113
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Catherine Lorbeer <clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 5, 2025 1:42 PM
To:
Klyszeiko, Matthew; Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Sifferman, Steven
Subject:
RE: EXTERNAL: RE: Map of County Islands
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thank you.  This is very helpful. 
 
Hope all is good with you too! 
 
 
 
 
Catherine Lorbeer AICP
Deputy Director Planning Division 
Development Services 
11465 W Civic Center Dr., Avondale, AZ 85323
Office: (623) 333-4018 
clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov
www.AvondaleAZ.gov 
 
 
From: Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com>  
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 1:32 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>; Catherine Lorbeer <clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov> 
Cc: Sifferman, Steven <Steven.Sifferman@mbakerintl.com> 
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: RE: Map of County Islands 
 
Hello Catherine, Please find attached a copy of the Maricopa Cou nty, county island map we displayed during the November 12 virtual meeting. Please note, that while this m ap does show county islands (i. e. unincorporated county land that is surrounded 
 
Hello Catherine, 
 
Please find attached a copy of the Maricopa County, county island map we displayed during the November 12 
virtual meeting. Please note, that while this map does show county islands (i.e. unincorporated county land that is 
surrounded on all sides by a municipality and/or tribal lands), the area in dark blue also includes all 
unincorporated land that exists within defined municipal planning areas and thus may be annexed in the future. 
 
In addition to Adams helpful response to your question regarding…does the county place comp plan land use 
designations on these county islands…thought I would add if you are inquiring about the county’s current policy, it 
specifies “Unincorporated areas outside of county area plans are designated Rural Development Area and are 
only appropriate for rural land uses and rural zoning.” 
 
Nice to hear from you, hope you are well. 
 
Matt

114
 
 
Matthew Klyszeiko | Department Manager - Planning 
Phoenix Plaza Tower II, 2929 N. Central Avenue, 8th Floor | Phoenix, AZ 85012 | [O] 602-798-7513 | [M] 
(480) 250-6829 | [F] 602-467-2201 
matthewk@mbakerintl.com | www.mbakerintl.com   
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 8:38 AM 
To: Catherine Lorbeer <clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov>; Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com> 
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: Map of County Islands 
 
EXTERNAL EMAIL 
 
Hi Catherine, 
 
I’ll have Matt forward you the map.  At this time, we do not plan on setting a variety of land use designations on the 
county islands; however, we do plan on setting policies related to urban county islands vs. rural ones as we do not 
currently have those.   
 
Thanks! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
From: Catherine Lorbeer <clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov>  
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 7:53 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>; Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com> 
Subject: Map of County Islands 
 
Hi Adam and Matt, At the November 12 virtual meeting, I recall seeing a map of county islands. Can you share a copy with me? Also, does the county place comp plan land use designations on these areas? Thanks, Catherine Catherine Lorbeer AICP 
 
Hi Adam and Matt, 
 
At the November 12 virtual meeting, I recall seeing a map of county islands. Can you share a copy with me?  Also, 
does the county place comp plan land use designations on these areas? 
 
Thanks, 
Catherine

115
 
 
 
Catherine Lorbeer AICP
Deputy Director Planning Division 
Development Services 
11465 W Civic Center Dr., Avondale, AZ 85323
Office: (623) 333-4018 
clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov
www.AvondaleAZ.gov

116
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 5, 2025 1:32 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND); Catherine Lorbeer
Cc:
Sifferman, Steven
Subject:
RE: EXTERNAL: RE: Map of County Islands
Attachments:
29b_County_Islands_Org.png
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hello Catherine, 
 
Please find attached a copy of the Maricopa County, county island map we displayed during the November 12 
virtual meeting. Please note, that while this map does show county islands (i.e. unincorporated county land that is 
surrounded on all sides by a municipality and/or tribal lands), the area in dark blue also includes all 
unincorporated land that exists within defined municipal planning areas and thus may be annexed in the future. 
 
In addition to Adams helpful response to your question regarding…does the county place comp plan land use 
designations on these county islands…thought I would add if you are inquiring about the county’s current policy, it 
specifies “Unincorporated areas outside of county area plans are designated Rural Development Area and are 
only appropriate for rural land uses and rural zoning.” 
 
Nice to hear from you, hope you are well. 
 
Matt 
 
 
Matthew Klyszeiko | Department Manager - Planning 
Phoenix Plaza Tower II, 2929 N. Central Avenue, 8th Floor | Phoenix, AZ 85012 | [O] 602-798-7513 | [M] 
(480) 250-6829 | [F] 602-467-2201 
matthewk@mbakerintl.com | www.mbakerintl.com   
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 8:38 AM 
To: Catherine Lorbeer <clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov>; Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com> 
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: Map of County Islands 
 
EXTERNAL EMAIL 
 
Hi Catherine,

117
I’ll have Matt forward you the map.  At this time, we do not plan on setting a variety of land use designations on the 
county islands; however, we do plan on setting policies related to urban county islands vs. rural ones as we do not 
currently have those.   
 
Thanks! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
From: Catherine Lorbeer <clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov>  
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 7:53 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>; Klyszeiko, Matthew <MATTHEWK@mbakerintl.com> 
Subject: Map of County Islands 
 
Hi Adam and Matt, At the November 12 virtual meeting, I recall seeing a map of county islands. Can you share a copy with me? Also, does the county place comp plan land use designations on these areas? Thanks, Catherine Catherine Lorbeer AICP 
 
Hi Adam and Matt, 
 
At the November 12 virtual meeting, I recall seeing a map of county islands. Can you share a copy with me?  Also, 
does the county place comp plan land use designations on these areas? 
 
Thanks, 
Catherine
 
 
 
Catherine Lorbeer AICP 
Deputy Director Planning Division 
Development Services 
11465 W Civic Center Dr., Avondale, AZ 85323
Office: (623) 333-4018 
clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov
www.AvondaleAZ.gov

118
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Catherine Lorbeer <clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov>
Sent:
Wednesday, February 5, 2025 7:53 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND); Klyszeiko, Matthew
Subject:
Map of County Islands
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam and Matt, 
 
At the November 12 virtual meeting, I recall seeing a map of county islands. Can you share a copy with me?  Also, 
does the county place comp plan land use designations on these areas? 
 
Thanks, 
Catherine
 
 
 
Catherine Lorbeer AICP
Deputy Director Planning Division 
Development Services 
11465 W Civic Center Dr., Avondale, AZ 85323
Office: (623) 333-4018 
clorbeer@avondaleaz.gov
www.AvondaleAZ.gov

119
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Michael Rabstoff <mail@framework2040.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 28, 2025 2:16 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message May Be Unsafe 
Please verify with the sender offline, for example using a previously known phone number. Avoid replying with sensitive 
information, clicking links, or downloading attachments.  
What is the latest plan and timeline for development within the Bill Gates site near Tonopah? Thank 
you.

120
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Linda de Berge <ldeberge@gmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, January 23, 2025 12:44 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Thanks Adam, I will look at it when there is actually a plan.  Last meeting Jeff and I drove over 80 miles 
round trip after dark to attend a meeting of Maricopa County Planning in Surprise.  So it was all about the 
planning process, nothing about the plan itself.  We will wait until we have a preliminary plan that we can 
look at and react to.  I know you have to offer these meetings, but when there's more meat, I'lm with you 
and would like to know when that happens!  I think the phase that reads "Preparation of the Draft Plan 
would be good, when there is actually a draft to look at. Please keep sending me notices. Let us know 
when there's a draft plan made, and I'll notify everyone on my list, plus send them a copy!. 
 
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 2:17 PM Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
Do you have ideas on how Maricopa County can 
be improved in the decades ahead? Maricopa 
County is creating plans for decisions about land 
use, transportation, open space, jobs, housing, 
services, and more through the year 2040. 
 
Provide your thoughts and see what others have 
shared at framework2040.mysocialpinpoint.com 
  
Take the Survey

121
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Connor Murphy <connormurphyplanning@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, January 15, 2025 2:09 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Comprehensive plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
January 15, 2025 
  
Dear Planner Cannon: 
  
Not long ago, I received an email from Maricopa County inviting me to participate in updating the Comprehensive 
Plan: 
  
“We invite all residents, landowners, business owners, and other stakeholders within unincorporated Maricopa County 
to participate in upcoming public input sessions designed to gather feedback, ideas, and concerns that will shape the 
content and direction of the Comprehensive Plan.” 
  
Unfortunately, the “Public Input Session” was scheduled to take place at a high school in Surprise, after dark. I can’t 
drive in the dark. 
  
I have a few questions: 
 
  Why wasn’t the public input session held in Sun City a community of 
nearly 40 thousand people covering close to 15 square miles? 
 Why wasn’t the meeting held during the day, in a community with an 
average age of 72? 
I’ve been unable to make contact with the Sun City Homeowners 
Association and Livable Arizona. They don’t seem to be interested in 
participating in citizen participation. 
 
My question is: Where is citizen participation heading, and how can I participate as a single individual who is not 
part of a citizen action group? 
I am a severely disabled veteran, so I try to do as much as I can without leaving home. 
Sincerely, Connor Murphy

122
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Kelly Harris <kelly@myhomegroup.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 14, 2025 11:12 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Inquiry #: 93549
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Adam thank you so much for the message!  Do you think this would be valuable information to a room full 
of real estate agents?  Our goal is to not only educate them, but to help empower them with 
information that will help them rise above their competition.  We try to attract top producing agents from 
all brokerages to our classes/events.  This is why I am always on the hunt for new, engaging content.  
 
Let me know your thoughts! 
 
Thank you! 
 
 
 
Kelly Harris
VP of Corporate Culture
 
 
O: 480.685.2760
C: 602.330.3627
 
8360 E Raintree Dr #120, Scottsdale AZ 
85260 
 
  
 
 
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:06 AM Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Good morning Kelly, 
  
My name is Adam Cannon and I am a Senior Planner with Maricopa County.  I am reaching out to you 
about your request to speak with your group about our Comprehensive Plan update and our update of 
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.  We would be happy to meet with your group.  Please let us 
know of dates and times that you will be holding your meetings over the next couple of months so that 
we can arrange this for you.

123
  
To give you a quick peek - our website for the Comprehensive Plan update is 
www.framework2040.com.  We would generally present some background information about the plan, 
and talk to your group about how they can participate.  Details will be forthcoming about the zoning 
ordinance update, but we will highlight how your members can participate with that as well.   
  
Thank you.  Please let me know if you have any questions. 
  
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade 
and beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard!

124
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Darren Gerard (PND)
Sent:
Tuesday, January 14, 2025 10:54 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Kathryn Garcia (PND); Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
FW: Planning Inquiry Communications Log Escalation  --  Attention Required
Adam: would you please contact this customer and coordinate a time in the next couple months for you (and the new 
senior planner) to head out to their association and give presentation on the comp plan update and zoning ordinance 
overhaul? DG 
 
From: PwsqlMail@mail.maricopa.gov <PwsqlMail@mail.maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2025 6:00 AM 
To: Kathryn Garcia (PND) <Kathryn.Garcia@Maricopa.Gov>; Darren Gerard (PND) <Darren.Gerard@Maricopa.Gov>; 
Kevin Myers (PND) <kevin.myers@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Planning Inquiry Communications Log Escalation -- Attention Required 
 
Inquiry Request Number 93549 was received on 01/08/2025 and has not yet been assigned 
or completed. If the inquiry has been assigned or completed, please be sure to update this 
in the Planning Inquiry Communications Log. 
 
Customer Name: Kelly Harris  
Inquiry Request Number: 93549 To review this request, click here  
Date Received: 01/08/2025  
Request Description: I would like to schedule someone from Maricopa County to present to 
our realtors. I am not sure which department to contact? We have a series of classes called 
"Know Your Valley" where we invite all of the different Maricopa County cities to come speak 
to agents from all brokerages about plans, growth, etc. in their prospective cities. It has been 
very well received in the last couple of years! I was thinking that in addition to having 
Scottsdale, Mesa, Tempe, Phoenix, etc. come to speak, maybe someone from the entire 
county would be a great presentation! Thank you in advance for any information you can 
provide me.

125
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
r c <rd_cam@cox.net>
Sent:
Friday, January 10, 2025 7:07 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Reminder: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
 
Adam,  
 
Wondering if you can help.  In Q4'24 the county solicited input on Parks development plans for parks 
in the NE valley.  It was advertised that West valley parks would be addressed in Q1'25.  Well, we're 
here now and I can no longer find the page. 
 
Any help you can provide is appreciated. 
 
Robert 
On Tuesday, December 31, 2024 at 02:53:28 PM MST, Adam Cannon (PND) 
<adam.cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote:  
 
 
Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
Do you have ideas on how Maricopa County can 
be improved in the decades ahead? Maricopa 
County is creating plans for decisions about land 
use, transportation, open space, jobs, housing, 
services, and more through the year 2040. 
 
Provide your thoughts and see what others have 
shared at framework2040.mysocialpinpoint.com

126
Take the Survey

127
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Karen Helle <mail@framework2040.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 7, 2025 4:41 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Hello, 
I am writing regards the proposed freeway going through between Patton rd and jomax rd (wittman).  
I'm wondering what year this is supposed to happen?After saving for most of my adult life, I 
purchased my dream property on the corner of 243rd and jomax.  I'm now wondering if it's even worth 
developing it.  I was planningtobuild a home.  Will it be condemed/taken by the county when the 
freeway goes through? 
Thank you in advance for your response, 
Karen Helle

128
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Rachel Walker <mail@framework2040.com>
Sent:
Monday, January 6, 2025 5:28 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Hello, can you let me know if comp plan amend applicatios are processed at one time during the 
year?

129
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
dawn Grover <mail@framework2040.com>
Sent:
Friday, January 3, 2025 11:11 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
New Message From Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
I would like to learn more about development plans for Maricopa County - including incorporated land 
and unicorporated land.  Specifically, is there a map or department i can speak with regarding the 
current and future plans for the county such as zoning, development, and status of business growth 
(have there been new companies approved to set up in the county etc...)

130
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Fran Noe <noeshomes@earthlink.net>
Sent:
Tuesday, December 17, 2024 4:58 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Thank you for the explanation. 
Have a Merry Christmas and a great 2025. 
 
 
 
On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:53 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Good morning Fran, 
  
This statute primarily refers to the allowance an HOA has to regulate public roads.  Right now, HOAs 
formed prior to 1/1/15 have the ability to do things such as restrict overnight on street parking, require 
certain types of landscaping, only allow certain types of vehicles, etc.  HOAs formed after 12/31/14 do 
not have any authority to regulate public roads in their CC&Rs. 
  
However, HOAs formed prior to 1/1/15 may still continue to regulate the roads if they proactively take a 
vote in favor of doing so by June 30, 2025. If they do not do so or the vote does not pass in accordance 
with ARS requirements, those HOAs will no longer have the ability to regulate public roads in the 
CC&Rs.   
  
MCDOT will enforce its regulations associated with the roads, while Planning will enforce zoning 
ordinance regulations.  We have adequate staff for zoning ordinance matters.  If there is a complaint 
associated with the zoning ordinance, our team will investigate it, verify it and carry out enforcement 
procedures as we currently do. However, the rules in expiring CC&Rs that are not found in our zoning 
ordinance, such as bans on overnight on-street parking, will not be enforced by Code Enforcement.   
  
Best regards, 
  
<image001.png> 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn

131
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for 
the next decade and beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
  
  
  
From: Fran Noe <noeshomes@earthlink.net>  
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 5:30 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
  
Mr. Cannon, If jurisdi ction changes to Maricopa County regarding HOA street parking (county island HOA properties), will the County have the staffing to enfor ce county compliance? ARS 33-1818 Thanks for your time, Fran Noe On Dec 16, 2024, at 
Mr. Cannon, 
If jurisdiction changes to Maricopa County  
regarding HOA street parking (county island HOA properties), will the County have the staffing to 
enforce county compliance? 
ARS 33-1818 
Thanks for your time, 
Fran Noe 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
On Dec 16, 2024, at 2:16 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
wrote: 
  
Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
<image001.png>
Do you have ideas on how Maricopa County can 
be improved in the decades ahead? Maricopa 
County is creating plans for decisions about land 
use, transportation, open space, jobs, housing, 
services, and more through the year 2040. 
 
Provide your thoughts and see what others have 
shared at framework2040.mysocialpinpoint.com

132
Take the Survey 
  
<Framework 2040 - About the Comprehensive Plan.pdf>

133
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Sent:
Tuesday, December 17, 2024 10:09 AM
To:
Merissa Hamilton
Subject:
RE: Framework 2040
Hi Merissa, 
 
No problem.  That date and time will work for us.  What will be the location of the meeting? 
 
Thank you! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
 
 
From: Merissa Hamilton <merissa@merissahamilton.com>  
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 6:37 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: Framework 2040 
 
Hi Adam, Sorry for the delay in replying. We had to get our end of the year activities out of the way. We were thinking of having our next Pie Club meeting on Thursday, Jan. 30th at 6: 30 pm. Would that work for you to come speak to our group? 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd 
Hi Adam, 
 
Sorry for the delay in replying. We had to get our end of the year activities out of the way.  
 
We were thinking of having our next Pie Club meeting on Thursday, Jan. 30th at 6:30 pm.  
 
Would that work for you to come speak to our group? 
 
We'll also send your survey out to our members and subscribers. 
 
Thanks so much! 
 
Merissa Hamilton 
(480) 374-0102

134
 
 
 
 
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 9:30 AM Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Hi Merissa, 
  
Thank you for attending last night and thank you for your group’s interest in the plan.  We’d be happy to schedule a 
stakeholder meeting with your group and share the plan.  Could you let me know what your Pie Club schedule is over 
the next few months and location where the meetings will be held?   
  
Best regards, 
  
The linked image cannot be displayed.  The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
From: Merissa Hamilton <merissa@merissahamilton.com>  
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 6:44 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Framework 2040 
  
Hi Adam, Tha nk you so much for your community engagement on the Framew ork 2040 plan. I am the Chairwoman of the grassroots organization EZAZ. org. Many of our members have been very engaged with Maricopa County, and it would be very benefi cial 
Hi Adam, 
  
Thank you so much for your community engagement on the Framework 2040 plan.

135
  
I am the Chairwoman of the grassroots organization EZAZ.org. Many of our members have been very engaged with 
Maricopa County, and it would be very beneficial if the County could do a presentation for our group.  
  
We have a friendly environment with very passionate citizens. We have a monthly Pie Club meeting where we serve pie 
and ice cream and learn about our government. We'd love to have a representative share the plan with our group and 
get feedback from our membership. 
  
Please let me know if this is possible. 
  
Thank you so much for prioritizing outreach. This is great! 
  
  
Merissa Hamilton 
(480) 374-0102

136
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Sent:
Tuesday, December 17, 2024 9:53 AM
To:
Fran Noe
Cc:
Charles Hart (PND); Darren Gerard (PND)
Subject:
RE: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County
Good morning Fran, 
 
This statute primarily refers to the allowance an HOA has to regulate public roads.  Right now, HOAs formed prior to 
1/1/15 have the ability to do things such as restrict overnight on street parking, require certain types of landscaping, 
only allow certain types of vehicles, etc.  HOAs formed after 12/31/14 do not have any authority to regulate public roads 
in their CC&Rs. 
 
However, HOAs formed prior to 1/1/15 may still continue to regulate the roads if they proactively take a vote in favor of 
doing so by June 30, 2025. If they do not do so or the vote does not pass in accordance with ARS requirements, those 
HOAs will no longer have the ability to regulate public roads in the CC&Rs.   
 
MCDOT will enforce its regulations associated with the roads, while Planning will enforce zoning ordinance 
regulations.  We have adequate staff for zoning ordinance matters.  If there is a complaint associated with the zoning 
ordinance, our team will investigate it, verify it and carry out enforcement procedures as we currently do. However, the 
rules in expiring CC&Rs that are not found in our zoning ordinance, such as bans on overnight on-street parking, will not 
be enforced by Code Enforcement.   
 
Best regards, 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
 
 
From: Fran Noe <noeshomes@earthlink.net>  
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 5:30 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
 
Mr. Cannon, If jurisdi ction changes to Maricopa County regarding HOA street parking (county island HOA properties), will the County have the staffing to enfor ce county compliance? ARS 33-1818 Thanks for your time, Fran Noe On Dec 16, 2024, at 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

137
Mr. Cannon, 
If jurisdiction changes to Maricopa County  
regarding HOA street parking (county island HOA properties), will the County have the staffing to enforce county 
compliance? 
ARS 33-1818 
Thanks for your time, 
Fran Noe 
 
 
 
 
On Dec 16, 2024, at 2:16 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
<image001.png>
Do you have ideas on how Maricopa County can 
be improved in the decades ahead? Maricopa 
County is creating plans for decisions about land 
use, transportation, open space, jobs, housing, 
services, and more through the year 2040. 
 
Provide your thoughts and see what others have 
shared at framework2040.mysocialpinpoint.com 
  
Take the Survey 
  
<Framework 2040 - About the Comprehensive Plan.pdf>

138
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Merissa Hamilton <merissa@merissahamilton.com>
Sent:
Monday, December 16, 2024 6:37 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Framework 2040
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam, 
 
Sorry for the delay in replying. We had to get our end of the year activities out of the way.  
 
We were thinking of having our next Pie Club meeting on Thursday, Jan. 30th at 6:30 pm.  
 
Would that work for you to come speak to our group? 
 
We'll also send your survey out to our members and subscribers. 
 
Thanks so much! 
 
Merissa Hamilton 
(480) 374-0102 
 
 
 
 
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 9:30 AM Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Hi Merissa, 
  
Thank you for attending last night and thank you for your group’s interest in the plan.  We’d be happy to 
schedule a stakeholder meeting with your group and share the plan.  Could you let me know what your 
Pie Club schedule is over the next few months and location where the meetings will be held?   
  
Best regards,

139
The linked image cannot be displayed.  The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
From: Merissa Hamilton <merissa@merissahamilton.com>  
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 6:44 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Framework 2040 
  
Hi Adam, Thank you so much for your community engagement on the Framew ork 2040 plan. I am the Chairwoman of the grassroots organization EZAZ. org. Many of our members have been very engaged with Maricopa County, and it would be very beneficial 
Hi Adam, 
  
Thank you so much for your community engagement on the Framework 2040 plan. 
  
I am the Chairwoman of the grassroots organization EZAZ.org. Many of our members have been very 
engaged with Maricopa County, and it would be very beneficial if the County could do a presentation for 
our group.  
  
We have a friendly environment with very passionate citizens. We have a monthly Pie Club meeting 
where we serve pie and ice cream and learn about our government. We'd love to have a representative 
share the plan with our group and get feedback from our membership. 
  
Please let me know if this is possible.

140
Thank you so much for prioritizing outreach. This is great! 
  
  
Merissa Hamilton 
(480) 374-0102

141
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Fran Noe <noeshomes@earthlink.net>
Sent:
Monday, December 16, 2024 5:30 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Mr. Cannon, 
If jurisdiction changes to Maricopa County  
regarding HOA street parking (county island HOA properties), will the County have the staffing to enforce 
county compliance? 
ARS 33-1818 
Thanks for your time, 
Fran Noe 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On Dec 16, 2024, at 2:16 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
<image001.png>
Do you have ideas on how Maricopa County can 
be improved in the decades ahead? Maricopa 
County is creating plans for decisions about land 
use, transportation, open space, jobs, housing, 
services, and more through the year 2040. 
 
Provide your thoughts and see what others have 
shared at framework2040.mysocialpinpoint.com

142
Take the Survey 
  
<Framework 2040 - About the Comprehensive Plan.pdf>

143
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Jamie and John Martin <johmie429@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, December 16, 2024 4:56 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Thanks Adam. My background is compliance specifically around vendor contract oversight.  I reached out to 
Zachary on X.   
 
Enjoy your holidays! 
Jamie Weinhauer Martin  
602 403 4535 
 
 
On Dec 16, 2024, at 4:10 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Hi Jamie, 
  
I hope you are well!  Please direct your concerns about elections to officials dealing with elections.  If 
you have a comment about planning and development related matters, I will be happy to discuss that 
with you; however, neither this department nor I have anything to do with the election process or third-
party contracts. 
  
When we attended the meeting, I forwarded your comments the next day onto the division dealing with 
elections.  
  
See below: 
  
<image004.jpg> 
  
Thanks! 
  
<image005.png> 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for 
the next decade and beyond.

144
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
  
From: Jamie and John Martin <johmie429@gmail.com>  
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 3:32 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
  
Hi Adam, Can you discuss the third party contract vendor oversig ht failures in the past three elections? @cla baugh_mark @EverythingHomeT @realDonaldTr ump Me too. @DOGE @MarkStewart_AZ @azjustinheap @GinaSwoboda @abc15 @KTAR923 The unrealistic 
Hi Adam, 
  
Can you discuss the third party contract vendor oversight failures in the past three elections? 
  
@clabaugh_mark @EverythingHomeT 
@realDonaldTrump Me too. @DOGE 
@MarkStewart_AZ @azjustinheap 
@GinaSwoboda @abc15 @KTAR923 The 
unrealistic results of the past three elections 
stem from a critical failure by the state 
elections department and its third-party 
vendors to uphold their contractual terms 
and conditions. To address 
 
<image003.jpg>
 
Jamie Weinhauer Martin 
(@jamiemerc7) 
x.com
Thanks, 
Jamie Weinhauer Martin  
602 403 4535 
 
 
 
On Dec 16, 2024, at 2:15 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
wrote: 
  
Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
<image001.png>
Do you have ideas on how Maricopa County can 
be improved in the decades ahead? Maricopa 
County is creating plans for decisions about land 
use, transportation, open space, jobs, housing, 
services, and more through the year 2040. 
 
Provide your thoughts and see what others have 
shared at framework2040.mysocialpinpoint.com

145
Take the Survey 
  
<Framework 2040 - About the Comprehensive Plan.pdf>

146
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Jamie and John Martin <johmie429@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, December 16, 2024 3:32 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Hi Adam, 
 
Can you discuss the third party contract vendor oversight failures in the past three elections? 
 
@clabaugh_mark @EverythingHomeT 
@realDonaldTrump Me too. @DOGE 
@MarkStewart_AZ @azjustinheap 
@GinaSwoboda @abc15 @KTAR923 The 
unrealistic results of the past three elections 
stem from a critical failure by the state 
elections department and its third-party 
vendors to uphold their contractual terms 
and conditions. To address 
Jamie Weinhauer Martin (@jamiemerc7) 
x.com 
Thanks, 
Jamie Weinhauer Martin  
602 403 4535 
 
 
On Dec 16, 2024, at 2:15 PM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Weigh in on the Future of Maricopa County 
<image001.png>
Do you have ideas on how Maricopa County can 
be improved in the decades ahead? Maricopa 
County is creating plans for decisions about land 
use, transportation, open space, jobs, housing,

147
services, and more through the year 2040. 
 
Provide your thoughts and see what others have 
shared at framework2040.mysocialpinpoint.com 
  
Take the Survey 
  
<Framework 2040 - About the Comprehensive Plan.pdf>

148
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
l garcia <lg_garcia81@hotmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, December 3, 2024 7:01 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: District 1 - Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Meeting - Monday, December 2, 
2024
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thank you very much for the detailed response, Adam! I’m glad there are additional dates in the Spring and 
did not realize how broad the window is for input and additional education.  
 
We’ll watch the video, share info with our groups, and wait for the next round of dates to come around.  
 
Hope you enjoyed your Thanksgiving as well, and these last few weeks of 2024. Happy holidays! 
 
 
On Dec 2, 2024, at 8:37 AM, Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
  
Hi Lina, 
  
I hope you had a great Thanksgiving!  Thank you for participating and for your interest.  We are targeting 
April 2025 for the next round of meetings (one virtual & five in-person per district) for the 
Comprehensive Plan.  We have not scheduled a date, time or venue at this point, but will likely have an 
announcement on that front between mid-February and early March.   
  
The virtual meeting, which has the same content as the in-person meetings, is posted online at 
www.framework2040.com. 
  
In the meantime, we have some interactive online activities available that both you and your husband 
can participate in: https://framework2040.mysocialpinpoint.com/.  There is an idea wall, survey and 
interactive map.  The idea wall allows people to post what their ideas are for Maricopa County over the 
next decade.  People can like others posts and comment on others posts.  They can also include picture 
or video if they desire.  Additionally, the interactive map where people can place a marker on their 
favorite spot or identify assets or challenge areas (areas that may need investment or change) of the 
County.   
  
In terms of volunteering, the thing that is most helpful to us is spreading the word.  The biggest difficulty 
for long-range plans is being able to get quality input from a broad variety of individuals with different 
perspectives, particularly when the focus is specifically on unincorporated County land.  We will 
continue to share updates outside of the meeting period to engage people.  If you are willing, you could 
help us by forwarding those on to individuals in your network and any community groups or churches 
you are involved in.    
  
Thank you again.  Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

149
  
Best regards, 
  
<image001.png> 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
  
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for 
the next decade and beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
  
  
From: Lina Garcia <lgarciapd@gmail.com>  
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2024 8:34 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Re: District 1 - Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Meeting - Monday, December 2, 2024 
  
Hi Adam, Is there a ny cha nce ther e will be a few other dates available for each district? My husband a nd I are both very interested in the opportunity to attend a meeting and hear more about efforts to pla n for the fut ure in our community. We 
Hi Adam, 
Is there any chance there will be a few other dates available for each district? My husband and I are 
both very interested in the opportunity to attend a meeting and hear more about efforts to plan for the 
future in our community. We both work in public service and are also interested in volunteering to the 
extent we can assist in some way.  
  
Thank you for sharing this information.  
  
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:15 AM Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Join us to shar e your thoughts, idea s, and feedback! View as a webpage Guiding Mari copa County’s Future Gr owth and Development Maricopa County is pleased to a nnounce the kickoff of the process to update the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital 
View as a webpage

150
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County Logo
  
Guiding Maricopa County’s Future Growth 
and Development 
Maricopa County is pleased to announce the kickoff of the process to update 
the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital document that guides county 
decisions on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 
2040.  
Join us to share your thoughts, ideas, and feedback! 
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Be Part of Our Future Framework 2040 - Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan

151
Maricopa County is updating its Comprehensive Plan looking 10-20 years in 
the future. 
This is your chance to influence the future of Maricopa County. 
We'll be holding our first public meeting soon to explain the process and get 
your thoughts about the state of Maricopa County today. 
For specific meeting information, see below. 
To learn more and how to get involved, visit: www.Framework2040.com 
  
In-person events 
District 1 
Date: Monday, December 2, 2024  
Time: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM  
Location: Arizona College Prep High School - Cafeteria, 4477 S Gilbert Rd, 
Chandler, AZ 85249 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
Tell me more about the plan & process... 
Arizona state law (ARS 11-804) requires all counties to adopt and regularly 
update Comprehensive Plans that are consistent with state laws, and other 
requirements and guidelines. The Comprehensive Plan addresses topics such 
as land use, circulation, water resources, energy, open space, growth, 
environment, and cost of development.

152
The update process will be guided by input from community members of 
unincorporated Maricopa County. Public input from engagement opportunities 
will be recorded and catalogued to ensure that decision-makers have a full 
understanding of public sentiment when considering the final plan. 
To learn more, visit www.Framework2040.com 
  
  
Guiando el Crecimiento y Futuro Desarrollo 
del Condado de Maricopa 
El Condado de Maricopa se complace en anunciar el inicio del proceso para 
actualizar el Plan Integral del Condado, un documento vital que guía las 
decisiones del Condado sobre el futuro crecimiento, el desarrollo y la 
preservación hasta el ano 2040. ¡Únete a nosotros para compartir tus 
pensamientos, ideas y comentarios!

153
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
SÉ PARTE DEL FUTURO
  
El Condado de Maricopa está actualizando el Plan Integral del Condado, 
mirando de 10 a 20 años hacia el futuro. 
Esta es su oportunidad de influir en el futuro del Condado de Maricopa. 
Únete a nosotros en nuestra primera reunión para informarte sobre el proceso 
y escuchar tus opiniones sobre el estado del Condado de Maricopa hoy. Para 
información específica sobre la reunión, consulta a continuación. 
Para aprender más y cómo involucrarte: www.Framework2040.com 
  
Eventos en persona 
Distrito #1 
Fecha: Lunes, 2 de Diciembre de 2024 
Hora: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM 
Ubicación: Arizona College Prep High School - Cafetería, 4477 S Gilbert Rd, 
Chandler, AZ 85249

154
Confirme su Asistencia:  
HAZ CLIC AQUÍ 
(Se agradecen las confirmaciones de asistencia para fines de 
planificación)    
Dime más sobre el plan y el proceso… 
La ley estatal de Arizona (ARS 11-804) requiere que todos los condados 
adopten y actualicen regularmente Planes Integrales que sean consistentes 
con las leyes estatales y otros requisitos y directrices. El Plan Integral aborda 
temas como el uso de terreno, la circulación, los recursos de agua, la energía, 
los espacios abiertos, el crecimiento, el medio ambiente y el costo del 
desarrollo. 
El proceso de actualización será guiado por la opinión de los miembros de la 
comunidad del Condado de Maricopa. La opinión pública durante el proceso de 
participación será registrada y catalogada para asegurar que los tomadores de 
decisiones tengan un entendimiento completo sobre el sentimiento del público 
al considerar el plan final. 
Para obtener más información, visite www.Framework2040.com 
  
  
  
x

155
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
  
SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: 
Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe All  |  Help
.

156
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Lina Garcia <lgarciapd@gmail.com>
Sent:
Sunday, December 1, 2024 8:34 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: District 1 - Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Meeting - Monday, December 2, 
2024
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam, 
Is there any chance there will be a few other dates available for each district? My husband and I are both 
very interested in the opportunity to attend a meeting and hear more about efforts to plan for the future in 
our community. We both work in public service and are also interested in volunteering to the extent we 
can assist in some way.  
 
Thank you for sharing this information.  
 
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:15 AM Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Join us to share your thoughts, ideas, and feedback! View as a webpage Guiding Maricopa County’s Future Growth and Development Maricopa County is pleased to announce the kickoff of the process to update the county’s Comprehensiv e Plan, a vital 
View as a webpage 
  
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County Logo

157
Guiding Maricopa County’s Future Growth 
and Development 
Maricopa County is pleased to announce the kickoff of the process to update 
the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital document that guides county 
decisions on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 
2040.  
Join us to share your thoughts, ideas, and feedback! 
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Be Part of Our Future Framework 2040 - Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
  
Maricopa County is updating its Comprehensive Plan looking 10-20 years in 
the future. 
This is your chance to influence the future of Maricopa County. 
We'll be holding our first public meeting soon to explain the process and get 
your thoughts about the state of Maricopa County today. 
For specific meeting information, see below.

158
To learn more and how to get involved, visit: www.Framework2040.com 
  
In-person events
District 1 
Date: Monday, December 2, 2024  
Time: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM  
Location: Arizona College Prep High School - Cafeteria, 4477 S Gilbert Rd, 
Chandler, AZ 85249 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
Tell me more about the plan & process... 
Arizona state law (ARS 11-804) requires all counties to adopt and regularly 
update Comprehensive Plans that are consistent with state laws, and other 
requirements and guidelines. The Comprehensive Plan addresses topics such 
as land use, circulation, water resources, energy, open space, growth, 
environment, and cost of development. 
The update process will be guided by input from community members of 
unincorporated Maricopa County. Public input from engagement opportunities 
will be recorded and catalogued to ensure that decision-makers have a full 
understanding of public sentiment when considering the final plan. 
To learn more, visit www.Framework2040.com

159
  
Guiando el Crecimiento y Futuro Desarrollo 
del Condado de Maricopa 
El Condado de Maricopa se complace en anunciar el inicio del proceso para 
actualizar el Plan Integral del Condado, un documento vital que guía las 
decisiones del Condado sobre el futuro crecimiento, el desarrollo y la 
preservación hasta el ano 2040. ¡Únete a nosotros para compartir tus 
pensamientos, ideas y comentarios! 
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
SÉ PARTE DEL FUTURO
  
El Condado de Maricopa está actualizando el Plan Integral del Condado, 
mirando de 10 a 20 años hacia el futuro. 
Esta es su oportunidad de influir en el futuro del Condado de Maricopa.

160
Únete a nosotros en nuestra primera reunión para informarte sobre el proceso 
y escuchar tus opiniones sobre el estado del Condado de Maricopa hoy. Para 
información específica sobre la reunión, consulta a continuación. 
Para aprender más y cómo involucrarte: www.Framework2040.com 
  
Eventos en persona
Distrito #1 
Fecha: Lunes, 2 de Diciembre de 2024 
Hora: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM 
Ubicación: Arizona College Prep High School - Cafetería, 4477 S Gilbert Rd, 
Chandler, AZ 85249 
Confirme su Asistencia:  
HAZ CLIC AQUÍ 
(Se agradecen las confirmaciones de asistencia para fines de 
planificación)    
Dime más sobre el plan y el proceso… 
La ley estatal de Arizona (ARS 11-804) requiere que todos los condados 
adopten y actualicen regularmente Planes Integrales que sean consistentes 
con las leyes estatales y otros requisitos y directrices. El Plan Integral aborda 
temas como el uso de terreno, la circulación, los recursos de agua, la energía, 
los espacios abiertos, el crecimiento, el medio ambiente y el costo del 
desarrollo. 
El proceso de actualización será guiado por la opinión de los miembros de la 
comunidad del Condado de Maricopa. La opinión pública durante el proceso de

161
participación será registrada y catalogada para asegurar que los tomadores de 
decisiones tengan un entendimiento completo sobre el sentimiento del público 
al considerar el plan final. 
Para obtener más información, visite www.Framework2040.com 
  
  
  
x
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
 
SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: 
Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe All  |  Help
.

162
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Greg Loper <greg.loper@peoriaaz.gov>
Sent:
Thursday, November 21, 2024 8:48 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Reminder: Upcoming Meeting for Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Thanks Adam – please let me know if any of the meetings are also virtual. 
 
Have a great Thanksgiving holiday! 
 
Greg Loper, AICP 
Parks, Open Space & Natural/Cultural Resources Senior Planner 
Strategic Planning 
O: 623-773-4613 
M: 602-550-7004 
Greg.Loper@PeoriaAZ.gov 
 
City of Peoria | Planning Department 
9875 N. 85th Avenue, Peoria, AZ 85345  
Monday through Thursday, 7am to 6pm | Closed Friday 
PeoriaAZ.gov/planning 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2024 8:31 AM 
To: Greg Loper <greg.loper@peoriaaz.gov> 
Subject: RE: Reminder: Upcoming Meeting for Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
 
 
 



This email arrived from an external source. Please exercise caution when opening 
attachments or clicking on links.



  
 
Hi Greg, 
 
Will definitely keep you in the loop and send you draft updates.  We’re not expecting the drafts until later next 
year, but we will have the existing conditions document out to people over the next month or so.  We have two 
more meetings as part of this cycle (visioning).  Tonight there’s one in Anthem and Dec. 2nd one in Chandler – 
see below.  We will hold a second round of meetings on goals and policies in late spring (targeting April, after 
spring breaks). 
 
Location: Anthem Civic Building 
3701 W Anthem Way, Anthem, AZ 85086 
Room: Community Room 
Time: 5:00pm – 6:30pm

163
Date: Monday, December 2nd 
Location: Arizona College Prep High School 
4477 S. Gilbert Rd., Chandler, AZ 85249 
Room: Cafeteria 
Time: 5:30pm – 7:00pm 
 
Thanks! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next 
decade and beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
 
 
From: Greg Loper <greg.loper@peoriaaz.gov>  
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 5:40 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: RE: Reminder: Upcoming Meeting for Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
 
Hey Adam – I won’t be able to attend/participate in your meeting in Surprise, but hope to at a future date/location. Please keep me i n the loop as the update goes through the process, and please send me draft updates for review and for mal comments 
 
Hey Adam – I won’t be able to attend/participate in your meeting in Surprise, but hope to at a future 
date/location. 
 
Please keep me in the loop as the update goes through the process, and please send me draft updates 
for review and formal comments – thanks! 
 
Greg Loper, AICP 
Parks, Open Space & Natural/Cultural Resources Senior Planner 
Strategic Planning 
O: 623-773-4613 
M: 602-550-7004 
Greg.Loper@PeoriaAZ.gov 
 
City of Peoria | Planning Department 
9875 N. 85th Avenue, Peoria, AZ 85345  
Monday through Thursday, 7am to 6pm | Closed Friday 
PeoriaAZ.gov/planning 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:54 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Reminder: Upcoming Meeting for Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan

164
 
 



This email arrived from an external source. Please exercise caution when 
opening attachments or clicking on links.



  
Join us to shar e your thoughts, idea s, and feedback! View as a webpage Guiding Mari copa County’s Future Gr owth and Development Maricopa County is pleased to a nnounce the kickoff of the process to update the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital 
 
Join us to shar e your thoughts, i deas, and feedback!
 
View as a webpage 
 
 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County Logo
 
Guiding Maricopa County’s Future Growth 
and Development 
Maricopa County is pleased to announce the kickoff of the process to update 
the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital document that guides county 
decisions on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 
2040.  
Join us to share your thoughts, ideas, and feedback!

165
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Be Part of Our Future Framework 2040 - Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
 
Maricopa County is updating its Comprehensive Plan looking 10-20 years in 
the future. 
This is your chance to influence the future of Maricopa County. 
We'll be holding our first public meeting soon to explain the process and get 
your thoughts about the state of Maricopa County today. 
For specific meeting information, see below. 
To learn more and how to get involved, visit: www.Framework2040.com 
 
In-person events 
District 4 
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2024  
Time: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM  
Location: Valley Vista High School - Library, 15550 N Parkview Pl, Surprise, AZ 
85374 
RSVP HERE

166
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
Tell me more about the plan & process... 
Arizona state law (ARS 11-804) requires all counties to adopt and regularly 
update Comprehensive Plans that are consistent with state laws, and other 
requirements and guidelines. The Comprehensive Plan addresses topics such 
as land use, circulation, water resources, energy, open space, growth, 
environment, and cost of development. 
The update process will be guided by input from community members of 
unincorporated Maricopa County. Public input from engagement opportunities 
will be recorded and catalogued to ensure that decision-makers have a full 
understanding of public sentiment when considering the final plan. 
To learn more, visit www.Framework2040.com 
 
 
Guiando el Crecimiento y Futuro Desarrollo 
del Condado de Maricopa 
El Condado de Maricopa se complace en anunciar el inicio del proceso para 
actualizar el Plan Integral del Condado, un documento vital que guía las 
decisiones del Condado sobre el futuro crecimiento, el desarrollo y la 
preservación hasta el ano 2040. ¡Únete a nosotros para compartir tus 
pensamientos, ideas y comentarios!

167
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
 SÉ PARTE DEL FUTURO 
 
El Condado de Maricopa está actualizando el Plan Integral del Condado, 
mirando de 10 a 20 años hacia el futuro. 
Esta es su oportunidad de influir en el futuro del Condado de Maricopa. 
Únete a nosotros en nuestra primera reunión para informarte sobre el proceso 
y escuchar tus opiniones sobre el estado del Condado de Maricopa hoy. Para 
información específica sobre la reunión, consulta a continuación. 
Para aprender más y cómo involucrarte: www.Framework2040.com 
 
Eventos en persona 
Distrito #4 
Fecha: miércoles, 20 de noviembre de 2024 
Hora: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM 
Ubicación: Valley Vista High School – Biblioteca, 15550 N Parkview Pl, 
Surprise, AZ 85374 
Confirme su Asistencia:

168
HAZ CLIC AQUÍ 
(Se agradecen las confirmaciones de asistencia para fines de 
planificación)    
Dime más sobre el plan y el proceso… 
La ley estatal de Arizona (ARS 11-804) requiere que todos los condados 
adopten y actualicen regularmente Planes Integrales que sean consistentes 
con las leyes estatales y otros requisitos y directrices. El Plan Integral aborda 
temas como el uso de terreno, la circulación, los recursos de agua, la energía, 
los espacios abiertos, el crecimiento, el medio ambiente y el costo del 
desarrollo. 
El proceso de actualización será guiado por la opinión de los miembros de la 
comunidad del Condado de Maricopa. La opinión pública durante el proceso de 
participación será registrada y catalogada para asegurar que los tomadores de 
decisiones tengan un entendimiento completo sobre el sentimiento del público 
al considerar el plan final. 
Para obtener más información, visite www.Framework2040.com 
 
 
 
x 
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: 
Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe All  |  Help 
.

169

170
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Greg Loper <greg.loper@peoriaaz.gov>
Sent:
Wednesday, November 20, 2024 5:40 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Reminder: Upcoming Meeting for Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hey Adam – I won’t be able to attend/participate in your meeting in Surprise, but hope to at a future 
date/location. 
 
Please keep me in the loop as the update goes through the process, and please send me draft updates for 
review and formal comments – thanks! 
 
Greg Loper, AICP 
Parks, Open Space & Natural/Cultural Resources Senior Planner 
Strategic Planning 
O: 623-773-4613 
M: 602-550-7004 
Greg.Loper@PeoriaAZ.gov 
 
City of Peoria | Planning Department 
9875 N. 85th Avenue, Peoria, AZ 85345  
Monday through Thursday, 7am to 6pm | Closed Friday 
PeoriaAZ.gov/planning 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:54 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Reminder: Upcoming Meeting for Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan 
 
 
 



This email arrived from an external source. Please exercise caution when opening 
attachments or clicking on links.



  
 
Join us to shar e your thoughts, idea s, and feedback! View as a webpage Guiding Mari copa County’s Future Gr owth and Development Maricopa County is pleased to a nnounce the kickoff of the process to update the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital 
 
Join us to shar e your thoughts, i deas, and feedback!  
 
View as a webpage

171
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County Logo
 
Guiding Maricopa County’s Future Growth 
and Development 
Maricopa County is pleased to announce the kickoff of the process to update 
the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital document that guides county 
decisions on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 
2040.  
Join us to share your thoughts, ideas, and feedback! 
 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Be Part of Our Future Framework 2040 - Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
 
Maricopa County is updating its Comprehensive Plan looking 10-20 years in 
the future. 
This is your chance to influence the future of Maricopa County.

172
We'll be holding our first public meeting soon to explain the process and get 
your thoughts about the state of Maricopa County today. 
For specific meeting information, see below. 
To learn more and how to get involved, visit: www.Framework2040.com 
 
In-person events 
District 4 
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2024  
Time: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM  
Location: Valley Vista High School - Library, 15550 N Parkview Pl, Surprise, AZ 
85374 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
Tell me more about the plan & process... 
Arizona state law (ARS 11-804) requires all counties to adopt and regularly 
update Comprehensive Plans that are consistent with state laws, and other 
requirements and guidelines. The Comprehensive Plan addresses topics such 
as land use, circulation, water resources, energy, open space, growth, 
environment, and cost of development. 
The update process will be guided by input from community members of 
unincorporated Maricopa County. Public input from engagement opportunities 
will be recorded and catalogued to ensure that decision-makers have a full 
understanding of public sentiment when considering the final plan. 
To learn more, visit www.Framework2040.com

173
Guiando el Crecimiento y Futuro Desarrollo 
del Condado de Maricopa 
El Condado de Maricopa se complace en anunciar el inicio del proceso para 
actualizar el Plan Integral del Condado, un documento vital que guía las 
decisiones del Condado sobre el futuro crecimiento, el desarrollo y la 
preservación hasta el ano 2040. ¡Únete a nosotros para compartir tus 
pensamientos, ideas y comentarios! 
 
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
 SÉ PARTE DEL FUTURO 
 
El Condado de Maricopa está actualizando el Plan Integral del Condado, 
mirando de 10 a 20 años hacia el futuro. 
Esta es su oportunidad de influir en el futuro del Condado de Maricopa. 
Únete a nosotros en nuestra primera reunión para informarte sobre el proceso 
y escuchar tus opiniones sobre el estado del Condado de Maricopa hoy. Para 
información específica sobre la reunión, consulta a continuación. 
Para aprender más y cómo involucrarte: www.Framework2040.com

174
Eventos en persona 
Distrito #4 
Fecha: miércoles, 20 de noviembre de 2024 
Hora: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM 
Ubicación: Valley Vista High School – Biblioteca, 15550 N Parkview Pl, 
Surprise, AZ 85374 
Confirme su Asistencia:  
HAZ CLIC AQUÍ 
(Se agradecen las confirmaciones de asistencia para fines de 
planificación)    
Dime más sobre el plan y el proceso… 
La ley estatal de Arizona (ARS 11-804) requiere que todos los condados 
adopten y actualicen regularmente Planes Integrales que sean consistentes 
con las leyes estatales y otros requisitos y directrices. El Plan Integral aborda 
temas como el uso de terreno, la circulación, los recursos de agua, la energía, 
los espacios abiertos, el crecimiento, el medio ambiente y el costo del 
desarrollo. 
El proceso de actualización será guiado por la opinión de los miembros de la 
comunidad del Condado de Maricopa. La opinión pública durante el proceso de 
participación será registrada y catalogada para asegurar que los tomadores de 
decisiones tengan un entendimiento completo sobre el sentimiento del público 
al considerar el plan final. 
Para obtener más información, visite www.Framework2040.com 
 
 
 
x

175
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: 
Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe All  |  Help 
.

176
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
RC <rd_cam@cox.net>
Sent:
Wednesday, November 20, 2024 7:04 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Reminder: Upcoming Meeting for Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
This is sent 5 days after the meeting in Litchfield Park? 
On Nov 19, 2024, at 4:56 PM, "Adam Cannon (PND)" <adam.cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Join us to shar e your thoughts, idea s, and feedback! View as a webpage Guiding Mari copa County’s Future Gr owth and Development Maricopa County is pleased to a nnounce the kickoff of the process to update the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital 
Join us to shar e your thoughts, i deas, and feedback! 
  
  
View as a webpage 
  
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County Logo

177
Guiding Maricopa County’s Future Growth 
and Development 
Maricopa County is pleased to announce the kickoff of the process to update 
the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital document that guides county 
decisions on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 
2040.  
Join us to share your thoughts, ideas, and feedback! 
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Be Part of Our Future Framework 2040 - Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
  
Maricopa County is updating its Comprehensive Plan looking 10-20 years in 
the future. 
This is your chance to influence the future of Maricopa County. 
We'll be holding our first public meeting soon to explain the process and get 
your thoughts about the state of Maricopa County today. 
For specific meeting information, see below.

178
To learn more and how to get involved, visit: www.Framework2040.com
  
In-person events 
District 4 
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2024  
Time: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM  
Location: Valley Vista High School - Library, 15550 N Parkview Pl, Surprise, AZ 
85374 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
Tell me more about the plan & process... 
Arizona state law (ARS 11-804) requires all counties to adopt and regularly 
update Comprehensive Plans that are consistent with state laws, and other 
requirements and guidelines. The Comprehensive Plan addresses topics such 
as land use, circulation, water resources, energy, open space, growth, 
environment, and cost of development. 
The update process will be guided by input from community members of 
unincorporated Maricopa County. Public input from engagement opportunities 
will be recorded and catalogued to ensure that decision-makers have a full 
understanding of public sentiment when considering the final plan. 
To learn more, visit www.Framework2040.com

179
  
Guiando el Crecimiento y Futuro Desarrollo 
del Condado de Maricopa 
El Condado de Maricopa se complace en anunciar el inicio del proceso para 
actualizar el Plan Integral del Condado, un documento vital que guía las 
decisiones del Condado sobre el futuro crecimiento, el desarrollo y la 
preservación hasta el ano 2040. ¡Únete a nosotros para compartir tus 
pensamientos, ideas y comentarios! 
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
SÉ PARTE DEL FUTURO
  
El Condado de Maricopa está actualizando el Plan Integral del Condado, 
mirando de 10 a 20 años hacia el futuro. 
Esta es su oportunidad de influir en el futuro del Condado de Maricopa.

180
Únete a nosotros en nuestra primera reunión para informarte sobre el proceso 
y escuchar tus opiniones sobre el estado del Condado de Maricopa hoy. Para 
información específica sobre la reunión, consulta a continuación. 
Para aprender más y cómo involucrarte: www.Framework2040.com 
  
Eventos en persona 
Distrito #4 
Fecha: miércoles, 20 de noviembre de 2024 
Hora: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM 
Ubicación: Valley Vista High School – Biblioteca, 15550 N Parkview Pl, 
Surprise, AZ 85374 
Confirme su Asistencia:  
HAZ CLIC AQUÍ 
(Se agradecen las confirmaciones de asistencia para fines de 
planificación)    
Dime más sobre el plan y el proceso… 
La ley estatal de Arizona (ARS 11-804) requiere que todos los condados 
adopten y actualicen regularmente Planes Integrales que sean consistentes 
con las leyes estatales y otros requisitos y directrices. El Plan Integral aborda 
temas como el uso de terreno, la circulación, los recursos de agua, la energía, 
los espacios abiertos, el crecimiento, el medio ambiente y el costo del 
desarrollo. 
El proceso de actualización será guiado por la opinión de los miembros de la 
comunidad del Condado de Maricopa. La opinión pública durante el proceso de 
participación será registrada y catalogada para asegurar que los tomadores de

181
decisiones tengan un entendimiento completo sobre el sentimiento del público 
al considerar el plan final. 
Para obtener más información, visite www.Framework2040.com 
  
  
  
x
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
  
SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: 
Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe All  |  Help
.

182
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
RC <rd_cam@cox.net>
Sent:
Wednesday, November 20, 2024 7:05 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Re: Reminder: Upcoming Meeting for Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Laveen Village rather.  
On Nov 20, 2024, at 7:03 AM, RC <rd_cam@cox.net> wrote: 
This is sent 5 days after the meeting in Litchfield Park? 
On Nov 19, 2024, at 4:56 PM, "Adam Cannon (PND)" <adam.cannon@maricopa.gov> wrote: 
Join us to shar e your thoughts, idea s, and feedback! View as a webpage Guiding Mari copa County’s Future Gr owth and Development Maricopa County is pleased to a nnounce the kickoff of the process to update the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital 
Join us to shar e your thoughts, i deas, and feedback! 
  
  
View as a webpage 
  
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Maricopa County Logo

183
Guiding Maricopa County’s Future Growth 
and Development 
Maricopa County is pleased to announce the kickoff of the process to update 
the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital document that guides county 
decisions on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 
2040.  
Join us to share your thoughts, ideas, and feedback! 
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Be Part of Our Future Framework 2040 - Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
  
Maricopa County is updating its Comprehensive Plan looking 10-20 years in 
the future. 
This is your chance to influence the future of Maricopa County. 
We'll be holding our first public meeting soon to explain the process and get 
your thoughts about the state of Maricopa County today. 
For specific meeting information, see below.

184
To learn more and how to get involved, visit: www.Framework2040.com
  
In-person events 
District 4 
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2024  
Time: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM  
Location: Valley Vista High School - Library, 15550 N Parkview Pl, Surprise, AZ 
85374 
RSVP HERE 
(RSVPs are appreciated, for planning purposes) 
Tell me more about the plan & process... 
Arizona state law (ARS 11-804) requires all counties to adopt and regularly 
update Comprehensive Plans that are consistent with state laws, and other 
requirements and guidelines. The Comprehensive Plan addresses topics such 
as land use, circulation, water resources, energy, open space, growth, 
environment, and cost of development. 
The update process will be guided by input from community members of 
unincorporated Maricopa County. Public input from engagement opportunities 
will be recorded and catalogued to ensure that decision-makers have a full 
understanding of public sentiment when considering the final plan. 
To learn more, visit www.Framework2040.com

185
  
Guiando el Crecimiento y Futuro Desarrollo 
del Condado de Maricopa 
El Condado de Maricopa se complace en anunciar el inicio del proceso para 
actualizar el Plan Integral del Condado, un documento vital que guía las 
decisiones del Condado sobre el futuro crecimiento, el desarrollo y la 
preservación hasta el ano 2040. ¡Únete a nosotros para compartir tus 
pensamientos, ideas y comentarios! 
  
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
SÉ PARTE DEL FUTURO
  
El Condado de Maricopa está actualizando el Plan Integral del Condado, 
mirando de 10 a 20 años hacia el futuro. 
Esta es su oportunidad de influir en el futuro del Condado de Maricopa.

186
Únete a nosotros en nuestra primera reunión para informarte sobre el proceso 
y escuchar tus opiniones sobre el estado del Condado de Maricopa hoy. Para 
información específica sobre la reunión, consulta a continuación. 
Para aprender más y cómo involucrarte: www.Framework2040.com 
  
Eventos en persona 
Distrito #4 
Fecha: miércoles, 20 de noviembre de 2024 
Hora: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM 
Ubicación: Valley Vista High School – Biblioteca, 15550 N Parkview Pl, 
Surprise, AZ 85374 
Confirme su Asistencia:  
HAZ CLIC AQUÍ 
(Se agradecen las confirmaciones de asistencia para fines de 
planificación)    
Dime más sobre el plan y el proceso… 
La ley estatal de Arizona (ARS 11-804) requiere que todos los condados 
adopten y actualicen regularmente Planes Integrales que sean consistentes 
con las leyes estatales y otros requisitos y directrices. El Plan Integral aborda 
temas como el uso de terreno, la circulación, los recursos de agua, la energía, 
los espacios abiertos, el crecimiento, el medio ambiente y el costo del 
desarrollo. 
El proceso de actualización será guiado por la opinión de los miembros de la 
comunidad del Condado de Maricopa. La opinión pública durante el proceso de 
participación será registrada y catalogada para asegurar que los tomadores de

187
decisiones tengan un entendimiento completo sobre el sentimiento del público 
al considerar el plan final. 
Para obtener más información, visite www.Framework2040.com 
  
  
  
x
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
facebo ok
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
To help protect your privacy, 
Micro so ft Office prevented automatic 
download of this picture from the 
Internet.
 
To help protect y our privacy, 
Microsoft Office prevented 
automatic download of this picture 
from the Internet.
To help protect your 
privacy, Microsoft Office 
prevented automatic 
download of this picture 
from the Internet.
 
  
SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: 
Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe All  |  Help
.

188
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
rgw85086@gmail.com
Sent:
Tuesday, November 19, 2024 10:41 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Coordination of county plan with municipal planning
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Adam – Thanks for your reply. I appreciate the difficulty of your task, especially given the size of Maricopa County 
and everything that is happening here.  
 
PARKS – This issue may not be as difficult to solve as achieving peace in the Middle East, but progress seems to be 
just as elusive. Many people here in Anthem have talked and talked about what we should do, but no practical 
solution has emerged. And residents in the new developments in the North Valley – assuming their parks are 
private like ours – will soon be having the same conversations/debates (while also adding more overcrowding to 
the Anthem Community Park).  
 
This issue isn’t the #1 most important issue for Framework 2040, but it deserves the attention of our county and 
municipal leaders – together – to find a way to provide appropriate parks and amenities that fairly spreads the 
operational and financial burdens. Framework 2040 can be a “cattle prod” to tackle this situation. 
 
ROADS – A more important issue, in my opinion, is providing better roads that safely serve all the new 
development in the North Valley. Have you had the pleasure of driving on 43rd Avenue when parents are taking their 
kids to (or picking up from) the charter school just north of the Post Office? Admittedly, this has improved, but 
more new developments on the east side of 43rd Ave. will negate much of the progress that was made.  
 
There is a second traffic nightmare we will soon face when all the new development is completed on the east-side 
frontage road between Anthem Way and New River Road. This one concerns me because of the multiple entities 
involved. A solution requires ADOT, MCDOT and Phoenix to DO something TOGETHER! Several hundred vehicles, if 
not more, will be added to this road which cannot handle that load at the present time. And it seems as though 
nothing is happening. 
 
I suspect there are other equally serious road issues elsewhere in the County. I don’t believe it is the responsibility 
of Framework 2040 to SOLVE these issues, but I encourage you and your team to be a very vocal catalyst to get the 
right people to focus on each situation. Solving the two road issues that I’ve mentioned will go a long way to 
improving the daily commute of MANY residents of Anthem, New River and Phoenix. 
 
Thank you for your efforts to keep Maricopa County a great place to live.  
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 5:58 PM 
To: rgw85086@gmail.com 
Subject: RE: Coordination of county plan with municipal planning 
 
Good morning Roger,

189
 
Thank you for your comments and your participation in the virtual meeting.  Anthem is indeed a great place.  I’ll attempt 
to address your comments as best as I can: 
 
1) Parks are definitely difficult to control, particular if you have open access.  On one hand, you have pocket parks 
that you really can’t control who shows up as they are open, unless a community is gated – though it would be 
strange/rare for people to just pick a random community’s pocket park without them being a visitor of a friend 
in that neighborhood.  On the other hand you have the Community Park which, as you note, is an amenity that is 
paid for by the residents of Anthem.  I think if there is a crowding issue and its affecting the quality of life, the 
Anthem community and park management will need to make some tough decisions about who and how access 
is granted.  For example, there are recreation facilities in Sun City exclusive to residents.   
 
Other questions to ask would be whether the park is holding/advertising special events that are open to the 
public and attracting individuals from outside of Anthem.  If that is being done, its like with the Superbowl, 
people come to the valley and want to move here.  People come to that park during an event, and then people 
will want to go to it more.  That’s not going to stop if fun and exciting events like festivals or sports competitions 
are happening drawing those people in.   
  
2) I’ve forwarded this comment onto MCDOT.  The City of Phoenix coordinates with their applicants of 
developments to work with their streets department and if there is MCDOT jurisdiction, with MCDOT, on traffic 
improvements.  A traffic study will likely need to be approved by both the City, MCDOT and potentially 
ADOT.  The traffic study should capture traffic generated from the specific development(s) you are referring 
to.  In general, both the City and MCDOT have long range plans geared at anticipating potential traffic 
needs.  Our comp plan generally coordinates its goals and policies with their goals and policies.  I would 
recommend contacting them if you have any further questions about specific sites. 
 
Thank you again Roger.  
 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-506-3301 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and development for the next decade and 
beyond.   
Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be heard! 
 
 
 
From: rgw85086@gmail.com <rgw85086@gmail.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 7:45 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Coordination of county plan with municipal planning 
 
Adam – I wish you great success in your efforts on Framew ork 2040. And thanks for responding to the question I submitted at the end of tonite’s virtual meeting. I want to expand on the question that I raised… I reside in Anthem.  
 
 
Adam – I wish you great success in your eƯorts on Framework 2040. And thanks for responding to the question I 
submitted at the end of tonite’s virtual meeting.

190
I want to expand on the question that I raised… 
 
I reside in Anthem. Our unincorporated community is a great place to live, and we are very proud of that. But as 
you know, there are something like 20,000 new dwelling units planned for areas within 15 miles of us. Most (all?) of 
them will be part of Phoenix. There are two situations that I believe deserve a much closer relationship between 
Phoenix and Anthem/Maricopa County: 
 
1. Anthem is blessed with some really nice amenities, including a large Community Park, several smaller 
“pocket parks,” and a large indoor recreation center. The amenities are private, funded solely by the 
residents of Anthem through assessments, and intended for the use of Anthem residents only. We try to be 
welcoming to all visitors, but for several years now those amenities – especially the Community Park – 
seem to be considered “pubic” by residents outside of Anthem. This has led to crowding, especially on 
weekends and holidays. And with 20,000 new dwelling units popping up over the next few years, 
overcrowding will become a greater problem. 
2. Several of those 20,000 new dwelling units are currently or will soon be under construction along a stretch 
of the frontage road on the east side of I-17 between Anthem Way and New River Road. That stretch of road 
is simply incapable of safely handling the traƯic that will accompany all the new dwelling units – in 
particular, “rush hours” will be a real challenge. Phoenix has jurisdiction of the developments, but the 
responsibility for the road seems to be split between the County and Phoenix (and maybe the state?). As a 
result, it is very unclear if anyone is taking responsibility to resolve the problem which, if left unresolved, 
will cause some massive traƯic headaches. 
 
I don’t expect or suggest that Framework 2040 is intended to solve current, specific issues like these. It would be 
great if you could, but as I understand your scope, creating a framework for the County and municipalities to 
coordinate their plans and eliminate gaps and conflicts between them could be within scope. This would not be a 
problem in an area that is stable and with little or no growth, but that is not the case with Maricopa County. I hope 
that you will be able to address this issue; proactive coordination will prevent potential out-of-control 
development in the future. 
 
You may reach me via this email, or my mobile phone (text messages, too) at 630-258-9667. 
 
Thank You, 
Roger Willis  
Anthem, AZ

191
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Merissa Hamilton <merissa@merissahamilton.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, November 13, 2024 6:44 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Framework 2040
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam, 
 
Thank you so much for your community engagement on the Framework 2040 plan. 
 
I am the Chairwoman of the grassroots organization EZAZ.org. Many of our members have been very 
engaged with Maricopa County, and it would be very beneficial if the County could do a presentation for 
our group.  
 
We have a friendly environment with very passionate citizens. We have a monthly Pie Club meeting 
where we serve pie and ice cream and learn about our government. We'd love to have a representative 
share the plan with our group and get feedback from our membership. 
 
Please let me know if this is possible. 
 
Thank you so much for prioritizing outreach. This is great! 
 
 
Merissa Hamilton 
(480) 374-0102

192
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
rgw85086@gmail.com
Sent:
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 7:45 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
Coordination of county plan with municipal planning
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
 
Adam – I wish you great success in your eƯorts on Framework 2040. And thanks for responding to the question I 
submitted at the end of tonite’s virtual meeting. 
 
I want to expand on the question that I raised… 
 
I reside in Anthem. Our unincorporated community is a great place to live, and we are very proud of that. But as 
you know, there are something like 20,000 new dwelling units planned for areas within 15 miles of us. Most (all?) of 
them will be part of Phoenix. There are two situations that I believe deserve a much closer relationship between 
Phoenix and Anthem/Maricopa County: 
 
1. Anthem is blessed with some really nice amenities, including a large Community Park, several smaller 
“pocket parks,” and a large indoor recreation center. The amenities are private, funded solely by the 
residents of Anthem through assessments, and intended for the use of Anthem residents only. We try to be 
welcoming to all visitors, but for several years now those amenities – especially the Community Park – 
seem to be considered “pubic” by residents outside of Anthem. This has led to crowding, especially on 
weekends and holidays. And with 20,000 new dwelling units popping up over the next few years, 
overcrowding will become a greater problem. 
2. Several of those 20,000 new dwelling units are currently or will soon be under construction along a stretch 
of the frontage road on the east side of I-17 between Anthem Way and New River Road. That stretch of road 
is simply incapable of safely handling the traƯic that will accompany all the new dwelling units – in 
particular, “rush hours” will be a real challenge. Phoenix has jurisdiction of the developments, but the 
responsibility for the road seems to be split between the County and Phoenix (and maybe the state?). As a 
result, it is very unclear if anyone is taking responsibility to resolve the problem which, if left unresolved, 
will cause some massive traƯic headaches. 
 
I don’t expect or suggest that Framework 2040 is intended to solve current, specific issues like these. It would be 
great if you could, but as I understand your scope, creating a framework for the County and municipalities to 
coordinate their plans and eliminate gaps and conflicts between them could be within scope. This would not be a 
problem in an area that is stable and with little or no growth, but that is not the case with Maricopa County. I hope 
that you will be able to address this issue; proactive coordination will prevent potential out-of-control 
development in the future. 
 
You may reach me via this email, or my mobile phone (text messages, too) at 630-258-9667. 
 
Thank You, 
Roger Willis  
Anthem, AZ

193
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Lauren Trobaugh <ltrobaugh@bfsolaw.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 3:42 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: 11/12 Public Input Sessions Grand Virtual Event 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam,  
 
Thank you for this information. If its not public, we will definitely reach out for a formal request. 
 
Thank you again,   
 
Lauren Trobaugh 
Project Coordinator  
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC 
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210 
Phoenix, Arizona 85018 
Direct: 602.888.7869 
Fax: 602.888.7856 
  
 
  
Visit us at www.bfsolaw.com 
  
The informaƟon contained in this message is privileged and confidenƟal.  It is intended only to be read by the 
individual or enƟty named above or their designee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, 
you are on noƟce that any distribuƟon of this message, in any form is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately noƟfy the sender by telephone at 602.888.7860 or by fax at 
602.888.7856 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.  Thank you. 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 3:32 PM 
To: Lauren Trobaugh <ltrobaugh@bfsolaw.com> 
Subject: RE: 11/12 Public Input Sessions Grand Virtual Event  
 
Hi Lauren, 
 
We have not yet decided whether to post it publicly on the website or make it available on request.  We will make that 
decision after the event has concluded. 
 
Thanks, 
Adam

194
From: Lauren Trobaugh <ltrobaugh@bfsolaw.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 12:34 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: RE: 11/12 Public Input Sessions Grand Virtual Event  
 
Hi Adam, Thanks for your response. Do you know where it will be able to be watched at a later date? Thanks again, Lauren Trobaugh Project Coordinator Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC 4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210 Phoenix , 
 
Hi Adam,  
 
Thanks for your response. Do you know where it will be able to be watched at a later date?  
 
Thanks again,  
 
Lauren Trobaugh 
Project Coordinator  
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC 
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210 
Phoenix, Arizona 85018 
Direct: 602.888.7869 
Fax: 602.888.7856 
  
 
  
Visit us at www.bfsolaw.com 
  
The informaƟon contained in this message is privileged and confidenƟal.  It is intended only to be read by the 
individual or enƟty named above or their designee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, 
you are on noƟce that any distribuƟon of this message, in any form is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately noƟfy the sender by telephone at 602.888.7860 or by fax at 
602.888.7856 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.  Thank you. 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 12:32 PM 
To: Lauren Trobaugh <ltrobaugh@bfsolaw.com> 
Subject: RE: 11/12 Public Input Sessions Grand Virtual Event  
 
Hi Lauren, 
 
Yes we plan to record it and make it available the coming week after the meeting.  Thanks! 
 
Thanks, 
Adam 
 
From: Lauren Trobaugh <ltrobaugh@bfsolaw.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 11:51 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: 11/12 Public Input Sessions Grand Virtual Event  
 
Hi Adam, Is this evenings Public Input sessions virtual event going to be recorded or not to watch later? Please let me know . Thanks, Lauren Trobaugh Project Coordinator Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC 4343 East Camelback Road, 
 
Hi Adam,  
 
Is this evenings Public Input sessions virtual event going to be recorded or not to watch later? Please let me know.

195
Thanks,  
 
Lauren Trobaugh 
Project Coordinator  
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC 
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210 
Phoenix, Arizona 85018 
Direct: 602.888.7869 
Fax: 602.888.7856 
  
 
  
Visit us at www.bfsolaw.com 
  
The informaƟon contained in this message is privileged and confidenƟal.  It is intended only to be read by the 
individual or enƟty named above or their designee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, 
you are on noƟce that any distribuƟon of this message, in any form is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately noƟfy the sender by telephone at 602.888.7860 or by fax at 
602.888.7856 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.  Thank you.

196
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Lauren Trobaugh <ltrobaugh@bfsolaw.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 12:34 PM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: 11/12 Public Input Sessions Grand Virtual Event 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam,  
 
Thanks for your response. Do you know where it will be able to be watched at a later date?  
 
Thanks again,  
 
Lauren Trobaugh 
Project Coordinator  
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC 
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210 
Phoenix, Arizona 85018 
Direct: 602.888.7869 
Fax: 602.888.7856 
  
 
  
Visit us at www.bfsolaw.com 
  
The informaƟon contained in this message is privileged and confidenƟal.  It is intended only to be read by the 
individual or enƟty named above or their designee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, 
you are on noƟce that any distribuƟon of this message, in any form is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately noƟfy the sender by telephone at 602.888.7860 or by fax at 
602.888.7856 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.  Thank you. 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 12:32 PM 
To: Lauren Trobaugh <ltrobaugh@bfsolaw.com> 
Subject: RE: 11/12 Public Input Sessions Grand Virtual Event  
 
Hi Lauren, 
 
Yes we plan to record it and make it available the coming week after the meeting.  Thanks! 
 
Thanks, 
Adam

197
From: Lauren Trobaugh <ltrobaugh@bfsolaw.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 11:51 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: 11/12 Public Input Sessions Grand Virtual Event  
 
Hi Adam, Is this evenings Public Input sessions virtual event going to be recorded or not to watch later? Please let me know . Thanks, Lauren Trobaugh Project Coordinator Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC 4343 East Camelback Road, 
 
Hi Adam,  
 
Is this evenings Public Input sessions virtual event going to be recorded or not to watch later? Please let me know.  
 
Thanks,  
 
Lauren Trobaugh 
Project Coordinator  
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC 
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210 
Phoenix, Arizona 85018 
Direct: 602.888.7869 
Fax: 602.888.7856 
  
 
  
Visit us at www.bfsolaw.com 
  
The informaƟon contained in this message is privileged and confidenƟal.  It is intended only to be read by the 
individual or enƟty named above or their designee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, 
you are on noƟce that any distribuƟon of this message, in any form is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately noƟfy the sender by telephone at 602.888.7860 or by fax at 
602.888.7856 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.  Thank you.

198
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Lauren Trobaugh <ltrobaugh@bfsolaw.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 11:51 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
11/12 Public Input Sessions Grand Virtual Event 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam,  
 
Is this evenings Public Input sessions virtual event going to be recorded or not to watch later? Please let me know.  
 
Thanks,  
 
Lauren Trobaugh 
Project Coordinator  
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC 
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210 
Phoenix, Arizona 85018 
Direct: 602.888.7869 
Fax: 602.888.7856 
  
 
  
Visit us at www.bfsolaw.com 
  
The informaƟon contained in this message is privileged and confidenƟal.  It is intended only to be read by the 
individual or enƟty named above or their designee.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, 
you are on noƟce that any distribuƟon of this message, in any form is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately noƟfy the sender by telephone at 602.888.7860 or by fax at 
602.888.7856 and delete or destroy any copy of this message.  Thank you.

199
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Aimee Bergstrom <ab@berryriddell.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 9:57 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Meetings for the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update 
Begin Next Week!
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Received, thanks! 
 
Aimee Bergstrom 
Legal Assistant 
BERRY RIDDELL LLC 
6750 E. Camelback Road | Suite 100 | Scottsdale, AZ 85251 
480-565-3017 | 480-385-2757 fax 
ab@berryriddell.com | www.berryriddell.com 
 
This message and any of the aƩached documents contain informaƟon from Berry Riddell LLC that may be confidenƟal and/or 
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this informaƟon, and no privilege has 
been waived by your inadvertent receipt.  If you have received this transmission in error, please noƟfy the sender by reply e-mail 
and then delete this message.  Thank you. 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 9:56 AM 
To: Aimee Bergstrom <ab@berryriddell.com> 
Subject: RE: Meetings for the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update Begin Next Week! 
 
Hi Aimee, 
 
Just sent to you. 
 
Thanks, 
Adam 
 
From: Aimee Bergstrom <ab@berryriddell.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 9:53 AM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>

200
Subject: RE: Meetings for the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update Begin Next Week! 
Importance: High 
 
Hi Adam, Is there a link for the virtual meeti ng tonight? I RSVP’d for Wendy Riddell but did not see a link anywhere. Thanks! Aimee Bergstrom Legal Assistant BERRY RIDDELL LLC 6750 E. Camel back Road | Suite 100 | Scottsdale, AZ 85251 480-565-3017 
 
Hi Adam, 
 
Is there a link for the virtual meeting tonight? I RSVP’d for Wendy Riddell but did not see a link anywhere. 
 
Thanks! 
 
Aimee Bergstrom 
Legal Assistant 
BERRY RIDDELL LLC 
6750 E. Camelback Road | Suite 100 | Scottsdale, AZ 85251 
480-565-3017 | 480-385-2757 fax 
ab@berryriddell.com | www.berryriddell.com 
 
This message and any of the aƩached documents contain informaƟon from Berry Riddell LLC that may be confidenƟal and/or 
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this informaƟon, and no privilege has 
been waived by your inadvertent receipt.  If you have received this transmission in error, please noƟfy the sender by reply e-mail 
and then delete this message.  Thank you. 
 
 
From: Wendy Riddell <wr@berryriddell.com>  
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2024 2:40 PM 
To: Aimee Bergstrom <ab@berryriddell.com> 
Subject: FW: Meetings for the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update Begin Next Week! 
 
 
Wendy R. Riddell, Esq. 
BERRY RIDDELL LLC 
6750 E. Camelback Road, Suite 100 
Scottsdale, Arizona  85251 
480-682-3902 direct 
602-616-8771 cell 
480-385-2757 fax 
wr@berryriddell.com | www.berryriddell.com  
This message and any of the attached documents contain information from Berry Riddell LLC that may be confidential and/or 
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information, and no privilege 
has been waived by your inadvertent receipt.  If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply 
e-mail and then delete this message.  Thank you.

201
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2024 6:42 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Meetings for the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update Begin Next Week! 
 
Good evening all:  
 
As you may know, we are in the beginning stages of updaƟng our Comprehensive Plan and the public meeƟngs for that 
begin next week (see below).  With a certain recent big event, some of the other media we released disappeared fast so 
I wanted to ensure this made its way over to you.  Please consider having a member of your firm/company aƩend or 
forwarding on to any clients you would like to aƩend, parƟcularly if they are a resident of and/or develop in 
unincorporated county, so that there are addiƟonal voices represented.   
 
The meeƟng content will be the same across this first wave of meeƟngs.  If these dates/Ɵmes don’t work, there’s going 
to be another round (with different content, but same opportunity to provide comments) in Spring 2025 as well.   
 
Also - have a good weekend! Please feel free to contact me if you have any quesƟons or feedback! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn

202
Maricopa County looking to the future 
with update of Comprehensive Plan 
Maricopa County, AZ – Maricopa County is pleased to announce the kickoff of the 
process to update the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital document that guides 
county decisions on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 
2040. 
The Framework 2040 - Comprehensive Plan will serve as a guide to promoting the 
success, safety, and general welfare of Maricopa County, providing a basis to guide 
the development of both the natural and built environment while working to sustain 
and improve quality of life for residents of unincorporated Maricopa County. The 
Plan will address various county-wide topics, including land use, transportation 
systems, parks and open spaces, water resources, energy, economic growth, 
environmental planning and cost of development. When completed, the Plan will 
reflect the values and priorities of residents within unincorporated Maricopa County 
and will be used as a roadmap for decision-making over the next decade and 
beyond. 
The County adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 2016, and much has 
changed since then. New growth patterns, evolving industry, and Arizona law 
necessitate a comprehensive update to ensure Maricopa County's continued 
evolution aligns with long-term community values. 
To ensure the plan accurately represents the aspirations of County residents (i.e. 
those who live outside the municipal limits of a city or town), the Maricopa County 
Board of Supervisors is committed to a transparent and inclusive process. 
Board of Supervisors Chairman Sellers remarked, 
“The Comprehensive Plan is our blueprint for the future. 
It guides our decisions on land use, transportation, housing, open 
space, and more. A policy decision this important deserves full

203
participation from all corners of our County. We look forward to a 
comprehensive citizen-involved process.” 
We invite all residents, landowners, business owners, and other stakeholders within 
unincorporated Maricopa County to participate in upcoming public input sessions 
designed to gather feedback, ideas, and concerns that will shape the content and 
direction of the Comprehensive Plan. We know not everyone will be able to join us 
in-person. As a result, community members will be able to participate through both 
in-person and virtual events over the life of this update effort. 
 
Public Input Sessions 
VIRTUAL EVENTS 
GRAND VIRTUAL EVENT 
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 
Time: 5:30 PM – 6:30 PM  Location: Online 
 
RSVP Here 
IN-PERSON EVENTS 
DISTRICT 1 
Monday, December 2, 2024 
Time: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM Location: Arizona College Prep High School 
(Cafeteria), 4477 S Gilbert Rd, Chandler, AZ 85249 
DISTRICT 2 
Wednesday, November 13, 2024 
Time: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM  Location: Fountain Hills High School (Cafeteria), 
16100 E Palisades Blvd, Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 
DISTRICT 3 
Thursday, November 21, 2024 
Time: 5:00 PM – 6:30 PM Location: Anthem Civic Building (Community Room),
3701 W Anthem Way, Anthem, AZ 85086 
DISTRICT 4 
Wednesday, November 20, 2024 
Time: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM  Location: Valley Vista High School (Library), 
15550 N Parkview Pl, Surprise, AZ 85374 
DISTRICT 5 
Thursday, November 14, 2024

204
Time: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM Location: Betty H. Fairfax High School (Cafeteria), 
8225 S 59th Ave, Laveen Village, AZ 85339 
 
Get More Event Details Here 
The input gathered during these initial events will be carefully reviewed and used to 
inform the Plan drafting process. There will also be additional opportunities for 
public review and comment as the Plan progresses. 
 
For more information about the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan, to 
stay informed about upcoming events and sign up for email notifications, 
please visit www.Framework2040.com. 
 
 
_
 
_
 
_
 
_
 
_
 
Click to edit this placeholder text.

205
Adam Cannon (PND)
From:
Aimee Bergstrom <ab@berryriddell.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 9:53 AM
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Subject:
RE: Meetings for the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update 
Begin Next Week!
Importance:
High
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Hi Adam, 
 
Is there a link for the virtual meeting tonight? I RSVP’d for Wendy Riddell but did not see a link anywhere. 
 
Thanks! 
 
Aimee Bergstrom 
Legal Assistant 
BERRY RIDDELL LLC 
6750 E. Camelback Road | Suite 100 | Scottsdale, AZ 85251 
480-565-3017 | 480-385-2757 fax 
ab@berryriddell.com | www.berryriddell.com 
 
This message and any of the aƩached documents contain informaƟon from Berry Riddell LLC that may be confidenƟal and/or 
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this informaƟon, and no privilege has 
been waived by your inadvertent receipt.  If you have received this transmission in error, please noƟfy the sender by reply e-mail 
and then delete this message.  Thank you. 
 
 
From: Wendy Riddell <wr@berryriddell.com>  
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2024 2:40 PM 
To: Aimee Bergstrom <ab@berryriddell.com> 
Subject: FW: Meetings for the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update Begin Next Week!

206
Wendy R. Riddell, Esq. 
BERRY RIDDELL LLC 
6750 E. Camelback Road, Suite 100 
Scottsdale, Arizona  85251 
480-682-3902 direct 
602-616-8771 cell 
480-385-2757 fax 
wr@berryriddell.com | www.berryriddell.com  
This message and any of the attached documents contain information from Berry Riddell LLC that may be confidential and/or 
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information, and no privilege 
has been waived by your inadvertent receipt.  If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply 
e-mail and then delete this message.  Thank you. 
 
 
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>  
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2024 6:42 PM 
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Cc: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Subject: Meetings for the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update Begin Next Week! 
 
Good evening all:  
 
As you may know, we are in the beginning stages of updaƟng our Comprehensive Plan and the public meeƟngs for that 
begin next week (see below).  With a certain recent big event, some of the other media we released disappeared fast so 
I wanted to ensure this made its way over to you.  Please consider having a member of your firm/company aƩend or 
forwarding on to any clients you would like to aƩend, parƟcularly if they are a resident of and/or develop in 
unincorporated county, so that there are addiƟonal voices represented.   
 
The meeƟng content will be the same across this first wave of meeƟngs.  If these dates/Ɵmes don’t work, there’s going 
to be another round (with different content, but same opportunity to provide comments) in Spring 2025 as well.   
 
Also - have a good weekend! Please feel free to contact me if you have any quesƟons or feedback! 
 
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner 
Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003 
O: 602-372-0292 
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov  
[ Maricopa.Gov ] 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn

207
 
 
  
 
  
 
Maricopa County looking to the future 
with update of Comprehensive Plan 
 
Maricopa County, AZ – Maricopa County is pleased to announce the kickoff of the 
process to update the county’s Comprehensive Plan, a vital document that guides 
county decisions on future growth, development, and preservation through the year 
2040. 
The Framework 2040 - Comprehensive Plan will serve as a guide to promoting the 
success, safety, and general welfare of Maricopa County, providing a basis to guide 
the development of both the natural and built environment while working to sustain 
and improve quality of life for residents of unincorporated Maricopa County. The 
Plan will address various county-wide topics, including land use, transportation 
systems, parks and open spaces, water resources, energy, economic growth, 
environmental planning and cost of development. When completed, the Plan will 
reflect the values and priorities of residents within unincorporated Maricopa County

208
and will be used as a roadmap for decision-making over the next decade and 
beyond. 
The County adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 2016, and much has 
changed since then. New growth patterns, evolving industry, and Arizona law 
necessitate a comprehensive update to ensure Maricopa County's continued 
evolution aligns with long-term community values. 
To ensure the plan accurately represents the aspirations of County residents (i.e. 
those who live outside the municipal limits of a city or town), the Maricopa County 
Board of Supervisors is committed to a transparent and inclusive process. 
Board of Supervisors Chairman Sellers remarked, 
“The Comprehensive Plan is our blueprint for the future. 
It guides our decisions on land use, transportation, housing, open 
space, and more. A policy decision this important deserves full 
participation from all corners of our County. We look forward to a 
comprehensive citizen-involved process.” 
We invite all residents, landowners, business owners, and other stakeholders within 
unincorporated Maricopa County to participate in upcoming public input sessions 
designed to gather feedback, ideas, and concerns that will shape the content and 
direction of the Comprehensive Plan. We know not everyone will be able to join us 
in-person. As a result, community members will be able to participate through both 
in-person and virtual events over the life of this update effort. 
 
Public Input Sessions 
VIRTUAL EVENTS 
GRAND VIRTUAL EVENT 
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 
Time: 5:30 PM – 6:30 PM  Location: Online 
 
RSVP Here 
IN-PERSON EVENTS 
DISTRICT 1 
Monday, December 2, 2024 
Time: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM Location: Arizona College Prep High School 
(Cafeteria), 4477 S Gilbert Rd, Chandler, AZ 85249

209
DISTRICT 2 
Wednesday, November 13, 2024 
Time: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM  Location: Fountain Hills High School (Cafeteria), 
16100 E Palisades Blvd, Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 
DISTRICT 3 
Thursday, November 21, 2024 
Time: 5:00 PM – 6:30 PM Location: Anthem Civic Building (Community Room),
3701 W Anthem Way, Anthem, AZ 85086 
DISTRICT 4 
Wednesday, November 20, 2024 
Time: 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM  Location: Valley Vista High School (Library), 
15550 N Parkview Pl, Surprise, AZ 85374 
DISTRICT 5 
Thursday, November 14, 2024 
Time: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM Location: Betty H. Fairfax High School (Cafeteria), 
8225 S 59th Ave, Laveen Village, AZ 85339 
 
Get More Event Details Here 
The input gathered during these initial events will be carefully reviewed and used to 
inform the Plan drafting process. There will also be additional opportunities for 
public review and comment as the Plan progresses. 
 
For more information about the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan, to 
stay informed about upcoming events and sign up for email notifications, 
please visit www.Framework2040.com.

210
_
 
_
 
_
 
_
 
_
 
Click to edit this placeholder text.

This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the
county.
From:
Adam Cannon (PND)
To:
"Maggie Soffel"
Cc:
Michelle Montijo (COA); Michelle Hindman (GVR); Nathan Pryor; Max Hartgraves; Cecilia Riviere
Bcc:
Tom Ellsworth (PND); Darren Gerard (PND); Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
RE: Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan - Rio Reimagined reference
Date:
Thursday, February 19, 2026 10:36:00 AM
Attachments:
image001.png
Hi Maggie,
 
Thank you for taking the time to review the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan and for
sharing your suggestion. We appreciate your engagement and continued interest in the
County’s planning efforts.
The policy language was crafted to remain broad and adaptable, but we value your feedback
and will keep your comment in mind as we finalize the document.
 
Best regards,
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning & Development
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
O: 602-372-0292
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov
[ Maricopa.Gov ]
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and
development for the next decade and beyond.  Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be
heard!
 
From: Maggie Soffel <Maggie.Soffel@asu.edu> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2026 12:25 PM
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>
Cc: Michelle Montijo (COA) <Michelle.Montijo@Maricopa.Gov>; Michelle Hindman (GVR)
<Michelle.Hindman@Maricopa.Gov>; Nathan Pryor <npryor@azmag.gov>; Max Hartgraves
<max@gplinc.org>; Cecilia Riviere <Cecilia.Riviere@asu.edu>
Subject: Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan - Rio Reimagined reference
 
Hi Adam, I hope this note finds you well. The Framework 2040 Comp Plan looks great! I was reading through the draft plan and was wondering whether Open Space Policy #1. 3 is in reference to Rio Reimagined? It reads… “Maricopa County
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi Adam,
 
I hope this note finds you well. The Framework 2040 Comp Plan looks great!
 
I was reading through the draft plan and was wondering whether Open Space Policy #1.3 is in

reference to Rio Reimagined? It reads…
 
“Maricopa County will coordinate with the planning initiative that seeks to revitalize the Salt
and Gila River corridors as vital ecological, cultural, and economic assets.”
 
Would it be possible to add “Rio Reimagined” before “the planning initiative” for clarity? Open
Space Policy #1.4 specifically calls out the Lower Gila River Collaborative, so I thought this
addition might help clarify and identify alignment with Rio Reimagined.
 
Thank you for your consideration,
 
Maggie
 
Maggie Soffel, AICP
Senior Director
University City Exchange  I  Rio Reimagined
Arizona State University
777 Novus Place, Suite 105, Tempe, AZ 85281
office: 602-496-3221
email: maggie.soffel@asu.edu
web: universitycityexchange.asu.edu I rioreimagined.org
ASU is a proud partner of the Rio Reimagined river revitalization initiative. To learn more and receive regular updates, email
info@rioreimagined.com.

DATE:  
April 15, 2026 
 
TO: 
 Planning and Zoning Commission    
 
FROM: 
 Adam Cannon, AICP, Senior Planner  
 
SUBJECT: 
 Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Changes 
 
  
 
Included with this memorandum is a list of changes to the Comprehensive Plan occurring 
following the printing of the Planning and Zoning Commission draft.   
 
1) The City of Peoria commented requesting a change to the following language on 
page 48.   
 
“Maricopa County will refer to evaluate development proposals for alignment with 
municipal comprehensive and general plans as guides when making decisions 
involving County Islands and will also consider them elsewhere when reasonable 
when located within their planning boundary. Maricopa County will provide 
written notice of all entitlement actions requiring a public hearing to all 
municipalities within 3 miles of the boundaries of an entitlement proposal, and 
include municipality comments in staff report attachments. However, until land is 
annexed Maricopa County retains planning authority.” 
 
2) Revisions to pages 14-15, 100-101 and 109 of the draft plan are included in 
response to the feedback that the framework for urban services read more like a 
regulatory checklist requirement and less like an evaluative process framework.  
Please see the memorandum attachment for changes to those pages. 
 
If recommended for adoption, the revisions will be included in the final draft of the plan 
that is produced following the Planning and Zoning Commission Hearing on April 23, 
2026.  Any additional changes recommended will occur via a handout memorandum for 
CPA260002. 
 
Enclosure: 
 
 
City of Peoria Comments (3 pages) 
 
Edited pages 14-15, 100-101 & 109 (5 pages)

This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the
county.
From:
Greg Loper
To:
Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Klyszeiko, Matthew; Darren Gerard (PND); Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
RE: Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update: City of Peoria Comment
Date:
Wednesday, April 8, 2026 1:36:09 PM
Attachments:
image001.png
Thank you Adam and Maricopa County Team – we appreciate (again) the opportunity to
review and comment on the Comprehensive Plan update and understand your position.
 
Greg Loper, AICP
Parks, Open Space & Natural, Cultural & Historic Resources
Planning Department | Strategic Planning
O: 623-773-4613
M: 602-550-7004
Greg.Loper@PeoriaAZ.gov
 
City of Peoria | Planning Department
9875 N. 85th Avenue, Peoria, AZ 85345
Monday through Thursday, 7am to 6pm | Closed Fridays
PeoriaAZ.gov/Planning
 
From: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2026 12:38 PM
To: Greg Loper <greg.loper@peoriaaz.gov>
Cc: Klyszeiko, Matthew <matthewk@mbakerintl.com>; Darren Gerard (PND)
<Darren.Gerard@Maricopa.Gov>; Rachel Applegate (PND)
<Rachel.Applegate@Maricopa.Gov>
Subject: RE: Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update: City of Peoria Comment
 
 ⚠⚠This email arrived from an external source. Please exercise caution
when opening attachments or clicking on links.⚠⚠ 
Hi Greg,
 
Thank you for sending this comment.  We appreciate you, the Peoria team and the
compliment on the plan.  We’re willing to adjust some of this statement in the plan.  Please
see below for our revisions:
 
“Maricopa County will evaluate development proposals for alignment with municipal
comprehensive and general plans when located within their planning boundary.  Maricopa
County will provide written notice of all entitlement actions requiring a public hearing or site

plan review to all municipalities within 1 mile 3 miles of the boundaries of an entitlement
proposal, and include that municipality’s response and or recommendations of approval in
any staff report, and include municipality comments in the staff report
attachments.  However, until land is annexed Maricopa County retains planning
authority.”
 
The reason we are taking out “or site plan review” is because we do not route administrative
applications to municipalities and that is not a practice we intend to start.  With that said, if
there is a particular property that Peoria is interested in that is in administrative review, we
will be happy to share that information upon request with the understanding that the County
can’t require any site standards beyond what is specified in the ordinance or a prior
legislative action’s conditions of approval.  Where we can best coordinate with the City is
during zone change and special use permit applications when the City’s comments can be
taken into consideration.
 
Thank you again for reaching out to us and your comment on the plan.
 
Best regards,
 
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning & Development
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
O: 602-372-0292
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov
[ Maricopa.Gov ]
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
 
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and
development for the next decade and beyond.  Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings
and be heard!
 
From: Greg Loper <greg.loper@peoriaaz.gov> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 11:50 AM
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>; matthewk@mbakerintl.com
Subject: Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan Update: City of Peoria Comment
 
Adam & Matthew – My apologies for the lateness in the City’s response. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the 60-Day Review Draft of the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan. This is an excellent
 
Adam & Matthew – My apologies for the lateness in the City’s response.
 
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the 60-Day Review Draft of
the Framework 2040 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan. This is an excellent
document, and we commend both Maricopa County and its consultant, Michael
Baker International, on the significant amount and scope of outreach completed in
the preparation of the document and the exceptional quality of both the written
document and the exhibits and graphics within the Plan itself.
 
The City does have one comment though. In regard to language within Chapter 3
(The Comprehensive Plan in Context); the Section with the heading that reads

“Relating to Other Jurisdictions’ Plans” there is a paragraph entitled “Municipal
General Plans.” The last sentence of this paragraph reads as follows:
 
“Maricopa County will refer to municipal
plans as guides when making decisions
involving County Islands and will also
consider them elsewhere when
reasonable. However, until land is annexed
Maricopa County retains planning
authority.”
 
While the City of Peoria is much appreciative of the County’s efforts to refer to a
municipality’s plans when considering land use decisions that may affect a given
municipality, we would ask Maricopa County to consider the following alternative
language:
 
“Maricopa County will evaluate
development proposals for alignment with
municipal comprehensive and general
plans when located within their planning
boundary. Maricopa County will provide
written notice of all entitlement actions
requiring a public hearing or site plan
review to all municipalities within 1 mile of
the boundaries of an entitlement proposal,
and include that municipality’s response
and or recommendations of approval in
any staff report.”
 
 
Thank you again for the opportunity to review and comment on the draft 60-day
review version of the
 
Greg Loper, AICP
Parks, Open Space & Natural, Cultural & Historic Resources
Planning Department | Strategic Planning
O: 623-773-4613
M: 602-550-7004
Greg.Loper@PeoriaAZ.gov
 
City of Peoria | Planning Department
9875 N. 85th Avenue, Peoria, AZ 85345
Monday through Thursday, 7am to 6pm | Closed Fridays
PeoriaAZ.gov/Planning

The Municipal-Rural Influence 
Framework
The Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan introduces 
a new strategic framework for managing both urban 
and rural development across the unincorporated 
County’s vast and varied landscape. It is titled the 
Municipal-Rural Influence Framework, and it will 
function as the signature guidestone for regarding 
development decisions. 
Municipal-Rural Influence 
Framework
Identifies two areas in unincorporated Maricopa County: 
	
„ Area 
of 
Municipal 
Influence: 
Areas 
capable 
of 
supporting urban or suburban context development 
provided necessary infrastructure and services are 
available. 
	
„ Area of Rural Influence: Areas more appropriate for rural 
land uses and character and preservation of natural 
landscape.
Urban Solutions for Urban 
Development (USUD) Strategy
The evaluative strategy that Maricopa County employs to: 
	
„ Determine theEvaluate infrastructure readiness (water, 
sewer, roads, emergency services) prior toas part of 
considering urban development in unincorporated 
Maricopa County.
	
„ Gauge the ultimate feasibility of a Comprehensive Plan 
Amendment or zoning district change in unincorporated 
Maricopa County.
FRAMEWORK 2040 | Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
14

Table 1.   Plan Goals and Policies
                 LAND USE
Land Use Goal #1: Achieve a coordinated pattern of development.
Goal Statement: Ensure that development across the County is well-planned and cohesive, promoting 
efficient land use and infrastructure, and leading to a more organized growth pattern. 
Land Use Policy #1.1: Maricopa County supports phasing plans for new urban development to coordinate 
such development with new urban services and infrastructure.
Land Use Policy #1.2: Maricopa County supports market feasibility studies, cost/benefit where warranted 
to help determine when new urban development in unincorporated areas is appropriate. 
Land Use Policy #1.3: Maricopa County supports considering the existence or readiness of urban 
services and infrastructure as a factor in the approval or denial of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a 
Zoneing District Change in accordance with the Urban Solutions for Urban Development strategy.
Land Use Policy #1.4: Maricopa County supports limiting development in undeveloped areas where 
infrastructure and public services do not exist, or where no major infrastructure projects are planned, 
such as state and/or federal highwayscarefully evaluating development in areas where infrastructure 
and public services are limited or not planned, with consideration of long-term service delivery and fiscal 
impacts.
Land Use Policy #1.5: Maricopa County supports coordinating land use and infrastructure planning with 
state agencies, other counties, municipalities, relevant utilities, federal agencies, and other regulatory 
bodies. 
Land Use Policy #1.6: Maricopa County supports annexation of urban development in unincorporated 
Maricopa County by municipalities.
Land Use Policy #1.7: Maricopa County supports annexation of any unincorporated area of the County 
that is within a municipal planning area and completely surrounded by a municipality or municipalities.
Land Use Policy #1.8: Maricopa County supports the prevention of forming new County Islands.
Plan Goals & Policies
The following represents this plan’s important goals and policies, listed in Table 1, organized based on their Chapter and 
Element order:
 Chapter 1 •  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
15

As Maricopa County considers where urban development is appropriate in its area of jurisdiction, it will continue to use 
its Urban Solutions for Urban Development (USUD) strategy. This strategy requires that services and infrastructure be 
currently or readily available to meet the needs of residents and businesses, protect taxpayers, and protect public health 
and safety. This means that the following should be identified before approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a 
Zoning District Change for urban development:
The Urban Solutions for Urban Development (USUD) strategy is a policy approach used to evaluate the availability and 
accessibility of infrastructure and services when considering urban development. This strategy helps inform decisions 
related to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or Zoning District Change by identifying whether infrastructure and services 
can support proposed development over time.
The USUD strategy is advisory and is not a regulatory requirement. It does not establish conditions of approval or require 
that infrastructure or public facilities be constructed or in place prior to development approval.
The following factors may be considered as part of the evaluation of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a Zoning 
District Change for urban development. These considerations are used to inform staff analysis and decision-making. Not 
all factors will apply in every case, and they are not intended to function as minimum thresholds or approval criteria. These 
factors are not applied uniformly and will vary based on the type, scale, and location of the proposed development.
1 
That 
there 
is 
sufficientThe 
availability 
of 
potable 
water 
service, 
including 
confirmation 
of infrastructure, a Certificate of 
Convenience and Necessity and 
verification by the service provider of 
the ability to adequately serve new 
residents and businesses
2 
That 
there 
is 
sufficienttThe 
availability 
and 
capacity 
of 
sewer service, including verification 
by the service provider of the ability 
and capacity to adequately serve new 
residents and/or businesses
3 
That there is sufficient roadThe 
capacity of the roadway network 
to accommodate expected traffic 
increases from residents and/or 
businesses
4 
That 
there 
isThe 
presence 
of 
regional 
flood 
control 
infrastructure, 
to 
protect 
new 
residents and/or businesses aswhere 
necessary
5 
ThatThe availability of dry utilities 
(electric, telephone, natural gas), 
as applicable, are available to serve 
new residents and/or businesses
6 
That adequateThe availability of 
law enforcement and fire service 
is available to serve new residents 
and/ or businesses
7 
That adequateAccess to hospital 
or emergency medical facilities, 
are available and proximate to serve 
new residentswhere applicable
8 
That there is adequate The 
availability 
and 
proximity 
of elementary, middle and high 
school capacity, as appropriate, to 
serve new residents, and that such 
schools are proximate to applicable 
neighborhoods
9 
That adequateThe availability 
and 
proximity 
of 
 
parks, 
recreation, and community facilities 
are available and proximate to serve 
new residents
10 
That 
The 
availability 
and 
proximity 
of 
libraries 
are 
available and proximate to serve new 
residents as necessaryand other 
community facilities, as applicable
11 
ThatThe 
availability 
and 
proximity 
of 
alternative 
transportation facilities are available 
and proximate to serve new residents 
as necessary, as applicable
12 
ThatThe 
availability 
of 
other 
urban 
services 
and 
infrastructure, as necessary and on 
a case-by-case basis, are available 
to 
serve 
new 
residents 
and/or 
businessesapplicable and based on 
the specific development proposal
Not all urban development requires these services or infrastructure, so Table 6 identifies which services and infrastructure 
should be confirmed to exist or be readily available prior to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a Zoning District Change 
(note: the numbers in Table 6 correspond to the paragraph numbers listed above). However, not all of these listed urban 
services and infrastructure are expected to be present or resolved at the time of application.
Confirming Considering these listed urban services and infrastructure in Table 6 achieves several important objectives:
	
„ Protecting taxpayers as well as public health, safety, and general welfare;
	
„ Identifying which unincorporated areas are able to support urban development;
	
„ Implementing an important county policy: have orderly, timely and efficient urban development; and
	
„ Helping the county determine when and where urban development is appropriate.
Urban Solutions for Urban Development Strategy
FRAMEWORK 2040 | Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
100

Coordinated Pattern of Development
Achieving 
a 
coordinated 
pattern 
of 
development 
is 
essential 
to 
supporting Maricopa County’s long-
term strategic goals. Coordinated 
development 
can 
help 
produce 
balanced and economically efficient 
land use patterns that include a 
well-integrated mix of residential, 
retail, office, industrial, employment 
centers, open space, and community 
amenities. This approach advances 
several 
key 
objectives, 
including 
the implementation of the County’s 
Strategic 
Priorities, 
enhancement 
of overall quality of life, expansion 
of the economic and tax base, 
maintenance of fiscal stability, and 
reduction of reliance on residential 
development as the primary source 
of growth. In addition, balanced land 
use contributes to public health by 
increasing access to recreational 
opportunities, shortening travel times, 
and allowing residents more personal 
time.
This planning approach is especially 
important in unincorporated areas, 
where 
long 
distances 
between 
homes, workplaces, services, and 
recreational spaces are common. 
Land 
use 
imbalances 
in 
these 
areas can result in increased traffic 
congestion, 
longer 
commutes, 
and limited access to essential 
services. Achieving balance in these 
settings is often challenging due to 
differing community expectations, 
infrastructure constraints, and the 
evolving nature of growth at the edge 
of urban development. As expansion 
continues, new challenges arise in 
areas where urban and rural lifestyles 
converge. These urban and rural 
interface zones require thoughtful 
planning and practical solutions to 
maintain compatibility and livability.
Service / Infrastructure
Urban 
Residential
Urban 
Commercial
Urban 
Industrial
1  Water
YES
YES
YES
2  Sewer
YES
YES
YES
3  Roads
YES
YES
YES
4  Flood Control
YES
YES
YES
5  Dry Utilities
As Applicable
As Applicable
As Applicable
6  Police & Fire
YES
YES
YES
7  Medical
YES
NO
NO
8  Schools
YES
NO
NO
9  Parks & Recreation
YES
NO
NO
10  Libraries
As Applicable
NO
NO
11  Alternative Transportation 
As Applicable
As Applicable
As Applicable
12  Other Services
As Applicable
As Applicable
As Applicable
Source: Maricopa County Planning & Development Department
Table 6.   Urban Service and Infrastructure Requirements for UrbanConsiderations by Land Use Types
Note: The numbers in Table 6 correspond to the paragraph numbers listed on page 100.
Note: This table illustrates typical service relationships by land use type. It is not a set of requirements and is not used as a checklist for development approval.
The USUD strategy is used to inform staff recommendations and Board of Supervisors decisions by identifying infrastructure 
conditions, service availability, and long-term planning considerations. It does not operate as a checklist or pass-fail test 
for approval. Final decisions are based on the full range of adopted goals, policies, and case-specific factors.
 Chapter 5 •  LAND USE
101

1.4
Maricopa County supports limiting development in undeveloped areas where infrastructure 
and public services do not exist, or where no major infrastructure projects are planned, 
such as state and/or federal highwayscarefully evaluating development in areas where 
infrastructure and public services are limited or not planned, with consideration of long-
term service delivery and fiscal impacts.
1.5
Maricopa County supports coordinating land use and infrastructure planning with state 
agencies, other counties, municipalities, relevant utilities, federal agencies, and other 
regulatory bodies.
1.6
Maricopa County supports annexation of urban development in unincorporated Maricopa 
County by municipalities.
1.7
Maricopa County supports annexation of any unincorporated area of the County that is within 
a municipal planning area and completely surrounded by a municipality or municipalities.
1.8
Maricopa County supports the prevention of forming new County Islands.
1.9
Maricopa County supports planning coordination with adjacent municipalities, landowners, 
and neighboring public community members for proposed development within County 
Islands or municipal planning areas.
1.10
Maricopa County supports considering the plans and projects of overlapping or neighboring 
agencies in the planning of unincorporated lands and invite comments and coordination 
when appropriate.
1.11
Maricopa County supports flexible design and zoning techniques within County Islands or 
municipal planning areas through pre-annexation agreements, as needed, to align future 
development with the standards and service expectations of the adjacent municipalities.
1.12
Maricopa County supports directing new urban development to the Urban Growth Area 
identified in this plan and complying with the Urban Solutions for Urban Development 
strategy.
1.13
Maricopa County supports balanced land use patterns that include various residential, retail, 
non-retail employment, and public and civic land uses when appropriate urban services are 
available.
1.14
Maricopa County supports reducing the impacts of new urban development on existing 
rural land uses, including but not limited to, agriculture, mining, and forestry.
1.15
Maricopa County supports reducing the impacts of new rural development and new 
agriculture on existing urban land uses.
1.16
Maricopa County supports periodic reviews of the Area Plan Program and the individual 
Area Plans to assess relevance, implementation progress, and alignment with the Maricopa 
County Comprehensive Plan.
1.17
Maricopa County supports decommissioning an individual Area Plan upon Board 
consideration and approval if the amount of unincorporated land within the area equals less 
than 50% of the original total Area Plan limits.
1.18
Maricopa County supports requiring any Area Plan Update or new Area Plan to use the land 
use designations in the Comprehensive Plan.
 Chapter 5 •  LAND USE
109