MICHAEL BAKER JR CONTRACT 2013-002.PDF

CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTRACT
BETWEEN
MARICOPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
MICHAEL BAKER JR., INC.
FOR
SOUTHERN PARKWAY: SALOME HIGHWAY TO STATE ROUTE 85
WORK ORDER NO. 11005
CONTRACT NO. 2013-002
C-64-

CONSULTANT SERVICES
CONTRACT NO. 2013-002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 3
SECTION II PERIOD OF SERVICES 3
SECTION III PAYMENTS TO THE CONSULTANT 4
SECTION IV THE COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 4
SECTION V AMENDMENTS 5
SECTION VI RECORDS 5
SECTION VII PROJECT COMPLETION 5
SECTION VIII TERMINATION 5
SECTION IX OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 6
SECTION X COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 6
SECTION XI GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 8
SECTION XII SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 9
SECTION XIII NO KICK-BACK CERTIFICATION 9
SECTION XIV ANTI-DISCRIMINATION PROVISION 9
SECTION XV INDEMNIFICATION 10
SECTION XVI INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 10
SIGNATURE PAGE 13
CONTRACT ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF WORK
EXHIBIT B - CONSULTANT'S FEE PROPOSAL

CONSULTANT SERVICES
CONTRACT NO. 2013-002
Pursuant to the provisions of the Arizona Revised Statutes § 11-201 the Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors has the authority to enter into contracts.
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "COUNTY", is desirous of
having certain professional services performed in connection with CONTRACT NO. 2013-002, SOUTHERN
PARKWAY: SALOME HIGHWAY TO STATE ROUTE 85 hereinafter called the "Project", and as more
fully described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, and in accordance with Exhibit B, Fee Proposal, attached; and
Michael Baker Jr., Inc., hereinafter called "CONSULTANT", with its principal offices located at 2929
North Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85012, (602) 798-7571, subject to the following
terms and conditions:
THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SECTION I—SERVICES OF THE CONSULTANT
The CONSULTANT, under the general supervision of the COUNTY, Planning Division, Manager shall
prepare studies, reports, surveys, plans, drawings, specifications, and cost estimates as are necessary for
the Project according to the directions and designated standards of the COUNTY, and in accordance with
Exhibit A, Scope of Work. It is understood and agreed that the COUNTY authorized representative shall be
the COUNTY Planning Division, Manager or his duly authorized representative, hereinafter called the
"Agent". For purposes of this contract, the Agent's duly authorized representative shall be the Project
Manager and he/she shall be the sole contact for administering this contract.
The CONSULTANT shall meet periodically with the Agent so as to keep the COUNTY informed of the
progress of the work in accordance with the schedule defined in Exhibit A, Scope of Work.
The CONSULTANT shall promptly advise the Agent of any factors which develop during the Project that
would likely result in construction or design costs in excess of budgetary constraints.
SECTION II—PERIOD OF SERVICE
The CONSULTANT shall complete all work in accordance with the time requirements provided in Exhibit A,
Scope of Work, within THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE (365) CALENDAR DAYS after receipt of the
Notice to Proceed. Should extension of this contract period be necessary, and any such extension(s)
continue the date of contract performance for a time period of more than one (1) year from the original date
of contract expiration, adjustment(s) of the CONSULTANT's fee(s) may, upon agreement by both the
COUNTY and the CONSULTANT, be made in accordance with the Consumer Price Index for Urban
Consumers, Western Division, published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
using the published edition coinciding with the initial contract expiration date. Any such fee adjustment
shall only apply to the extended contract time period.
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 3 of 13

SECTION III—PAYMENTS TO THE CONSULTANT
The CONSULTANT shall be paid for work under this contract a not-to-exceed amount of $ 318,123.24 plus
a fee not-to-exceed $24,918.13 for optional tasks as identified below and in accordance with the Scope of
Work. A written authorization from the Agent will be required prior to initiating any optional task.
OPTIONAL
TASK NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL
6.1 Special Analysis Areas $24,918.13
The total contract amount will not exceed THREE HUNDRED FORTY THREE THOUSAND FORTY ONE
DOLLARS AND THIRTY SEVEN CENTS ($343,04t37) plus any adjustments that have been approved in
writing in accordance with the Maricopa County Procurement Code.
The COUNTY will pay the CONSULTANT upon completion of the work as accepted by the COUNTY,
except that progress payments may be made as billed by the CONSULTANT based on approved monthly
progress reports subject to the limitations set forth in Exhibit A, Scope of Work. No retention shall be
withheld from the contract
With each request for payment, the Consultant shall complete and provide the "Maricopa County Small
Business Enterprise Program Participation Reporting Form" which is included with this contract document.
The final invoice shall be paid to the CONSULTANT, as applicable, within forty-five (45) calendar days
after:
A. final completion of all work per Exhibit A, Scope of Work,
B. acceptance of the work by the COUNTY,
C. the COUNTY's receipt of the fully executed "Certificate of Performance" form (Attachment 2),
SECTION IV—THE COUNTY's RESPONSIBILITIES
The COUNTY will furnish the CONSULTANT, at no cost to the CONSULTANT, the following information or
services for this Project:
A. One copy of on-hand maps, records, survey ties, benchmarks, or other data pertinent to the Project.
This does not, however, relieve the CONSULTANT of the responsibility of searching records for
additional information, for requesting specific information, or for verification of that information provided.
The COUNTY does not warrant the accuracy or comprehensiveness of any such information.
B. All available information and data relative to policies, standards, criteria, and studies, etc. impacting the
Project as identified by the CONSULTANT.
C. Available staff for consultation with the CONSULTANT during the performance of studies and plan
development in order to identify the problems, needs, and other functional aspects of the Project.
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 4 of 13

D. Prompt examination of documents submitted by the CONSULTANT and rendering of decisions
pertaining thereto in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the work by the
CONSULTANT. The COUNTY will keep the CONSULTANT advised concerning the progress of the
COUNTY's review of work.
SECTION V—AMENDMENTS
This contract may be amended by mutual agreement of the COUNTY and the CONSULTANT.
Any alteration in the Scope of Work that will result in a substantial change in the nature of the Project so as
to materially increase or decrease the contract fee will require negotiation of an amendment to the contract
to be executed by the COUNTY and the CONSULTANT. No work shall commence on the change until the
contract amendment has been approved by the COUNTY and the Agent has notified the CONSULTANT to
proceed. It is distinctly understood and agreed that no claim for extra work performed or materials
furnished by the CONSULTANT will be allowed by the COUNTY except as provided herein, nor shall the
CONSULTANT do any work or furnish any materials not covered by this agreement unless such work is
first authorized in writing by the COUNTY in accordance with the Maricopa County Procurement Code.
Any such work or materials furnished by the CONSULTANT without such written authorization first being
given shall be at CONSULTANT's own risk, cost, and expense. The CONSULTANT hereby agrees to
make no claim for such work or materials furnished without such written authorization.
SECTION VI—RECORDS
Records of the CONSULTANT's expenses pertaining to this contract and records of accounts between the
COUNTY and the CONSULTANT shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and shall be
available upon request to the COUNTY or its authorized representative for audit during normal business
hours.
All CONSULTANT and COUNTY procurement records shall be retained for a period of one (1) year and
disposed of in accordance with the records retention guidelines and schedules approved by the State of
Arizona Department of Library, Archives, and Public Records unless applicable Federal regulations require
a longer period of retention.
SECTION VII—PROJECT COMPLETION
If, during the course of this contract, situations arise which prevent completion within the allotted time, the
Agent may grant an extension.
SECTION VIII—TERMINATION
The COUNTY may terminate this contract at any time upon reimbursement to the CONSULTANT of
expenses that include reasonable charges for time and material for the percentage of work satisfactorily
completed and provided to the COUNTY.
The COUNTY reserves the rights to postpone, terminate, or abandon this contract for the CONSULTANT's
failure to complete the Project on time or failure to comply with the provisions of the contract. The
COUNTY also reserves the right to terminate any or all parts of this contract for its own convenience as the
COUNTY may determine at its sole discretion.
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 5 of 13

The COUNTY hereby gives notice that pursuant to A.R.S. § 38-511 "A" this contract may be canceled
without penalty or further obligation within three (3) years after execution if any person significantly involved
in initiating, negotiating, securing, drafting, or creating a contract on behalf of the COUNTY is, at any time
while the contract or any extension of the contract is in effect, an employee or agent of any other party to
the contract in any capacity or a consultant to any other party of the contract with respect to the subject
matter of the contract. Cancellation under this section shall be effective when written notice from the
Transportation Director is received by all of the parties to the contract. In addition, the COUNTY may
recoup any fee or commission paid or due to any person significantly involved in initiating, negotiating,
securing, drafting, or creating the contract on behalf of the COUNTY from any other party to the contract
arising as a result of the contract.
The CONSULTANT may terminate this contract in the event of nonpayment of fees as specified in
SECTION III, PAYMENTS TO THE CONSULTANT.
SECTION IX—OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
A. All original documents including, but not limited to studies, reports, tracings, drawings, physical and
computer models, estimates, field notes, investigations, design analysis, calculations, computer
software, and specifications, prepared in the performance of this contract are to be and remain the
property of the COUNTY and are to be delivered to the Agent before final payment is made to the
CONSULTANT. The COUNTY will not reuse, alter or modify these documents without noting such
modifications, alterations, or intent of their reuse, and will hold the CONSULTANT harmless from any
claims arising from such reuse, modifications, or alterations of the documents. The CONSULTANT
may retain reproducible copies of all such documents delivered to the COUNTY.
B. If the CONSULTANT retains reproducible copies of all such documents delivered to the COUNTY, the
CONSULTANT may not use those documents in regard to current or future claims or litigation against
the COUNTY brought by another party or parties unless the documents are independently produced in
accordance with a court order or procedural rules and notice of such production is given to the
COUNTY immediately and prior to their production.
C. Copies retained by the CONSULTANT, sub-consultant(s), or any related entities are governed by
Arizona Law regarding the use of public records and may not be used for commercial purpose without
additional written permission from the COUNTY and the payment of all applicable fees.
D. The COUNTY reserves the right to reuse the documents as it sees fit.
SECTION X—COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The CONSULTANT is required to comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, local ordinances and
regulations. The CONSULTANT's signature on this contract certifies compliance with the provisions of the
1-9 requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 for all personnel that the
CONSULTANT and any subconsultants employ to complete any Project. It is understood that the
COUNTY shall conduct itself in accordance with the provisions of the Maricopa County Procurement Code.
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 6 of 13

The CONSULTANT warrants that it is in compliance with A.R.S. §41-4401 and further acknowledges
(1) That the CONSULTANT and its sub-consultants, if any, warrant their compliance with all federal
immigration laws and regulations that relate to their employees and their compliance with A.R.S.
§23-214, subsection A; after December 31, 2007, every employer, after hiring an employee, shall
verify the employment eligibility of the employee through the e-verify program and shall keep a
record of the verification for the duration of the employee's employment or at least three years,
whichever is longer.
(2) That a breach of a warranty under subsection 1 above, shall be deemed a material breach of the
contract that is subject to penalties up to and including termination of the contracts;
(3) That the contracting government entity retains the legal right to inspect the papers of any
CONSULTANT or sub-consultant employee who works on the contract to ensure that the
CONSULTANT or sub-consultant is complying with the warranty provided under subsection 1
above and that the CONSULTANT agrees to make all papers and employment records of said
employee(s) available during normal working hours in order to facilitate such an inspection.
(4) That nothing herein shall make any CONSULTANT or sub-consultant an agent or employee of
the contracting government entity.
Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension:
(1) The undersigned (authorized official signing for the CONSULTANT) certifies to the best of his or
her knowledge and belief, that the CONSULTANT, defined as the primary participant in
accordance with 45 CFR Part 76, and its principals:
(a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal Department or agency;
(b) have not within 3-year period preceding this Contract been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or
contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statues or
commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records,
making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity
(Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (2) of
this certification; and
(d) have not within a 3-year period preceding this Contract had one or more public transaction
(Federal, State or local) terminated for cause of default.
(2) Should the CONSULTANT not be able to provide this certification, an explanation as to why should
be attached to the Contact.
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 7 of 13

(3) The CONSULTANT agrees to include, without modification, this clause in all lower tier covered
transactions (i.e. transactions with subcontractors) and in all solicitations for lower tier covered
transactions related to this Contract.
SECTION XI—GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. The CONSULTANT shall furnish to the COUNTY for approval, the names of its key employees, and of
its subconsultants and their key employees, to be used on this Project prior to beginning the work
under this contract. Any subsequent changes are subject to the written approval of the COUNTY.
B. The CONSULTANT shall perform, with its own firm, work amounting to fifty percent (50%) or more of
the total amount of the contract value. Any deviation may be approved, in writing, at the discretion of
the Agent.
C. The failure of either party to enforce any of the provisions of this contract or to require performance of
the other party of any of the provisions hereof shall not be construed to be a waiver of such provisions,
nor shall it affect the validity of this contract or any part thereof, or the right of either party to thereafter
enforce each and every provision.
D. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the cost of any additional design, field layout, testing,
construction and supervision necessary to correct those errors or omissions attributable to the
CONSULTANT, and for any damage incurred by the COUNTY as a result of additional construction
costs caused by such consultant errors or omissions.
E. The fact that the COUNTY has accepted or approved the CONSULTANT's work shall in no way relieve
the CONSULTANT's responsibility.
F. It is mutually understood and agreed that this contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Arizona, both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity, or judicial
proceeding for the enforcement of this contract, or any provision thereof, shall be instituted only in the
courts of the State of Arizona.
G. When this contract requires the CONSULTANT to study specific geographic areas of Maricopa County
the CONSULTANT agrees during the term of this contract and any extensions thereof that
CONSULTANT will not perform similar services for any clients other than the COUNTY within that
specific geographic area without the written authorization and approval of the Transportation Director of
the COUNTY.
H. The CONSULTANT agrees that it, its principals, employees, sub-consultants, agents and assigns,
shall not accept employment as consultants, expert witnesses or otherwise in any pending or
contemplated litigation against the COUNTY during the term of this contract and any extensions thereof
without the written authorization and approval of the Transportation Director of the COUNTY.
I. The CONSULTANT agrees that it, its principals, employees, sub-consultants, agents and assigns,
shall not accept employment as consultants, expert witnesses or otherwise in any future litigation
against the COUNTY in regard to the subject matter of this contract without the written authorization
and approval of the Transportation Director of the COUNTY.
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 8 of 13

J. It is understood that the COUNTY shall have the right to seek and obtain in any court of competent
jurisdiction an injunction to restrain a violation or alleged violation by the CONSULTANT, its principals,
employees, sub-consultants, agents or assigns, of the provisions of G., H., and I. of this section or of
the provisions of B. of Section IX, and the right of action for full damages at law, in addition to any other
remedies provided by this contract. In no case shall a waiver by the COUNTY of the right to seek relief
under this provision constitute a waiver of any other or further violation.
K. The Consultant shall incorporate stormwater quality best management practices (BMPs) in the design
of the project and comply with the Maricopa County Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge
Control Regulation, the Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards, and the Maricopa County
Drainage Regulations, using guidance from the Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual, Vol. III,
Erosion Control.
SECTION XII—SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
This contract shall not be assigned by either party without prior written approval of the other except that the
CONSULTANT may use in the performance of this contract without prior approval of the COUNTY,
personnel or services of its related entities and affiliated companies as if they were an integral part of the
CONSULTANT; and it shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors
and assigns of the parties hereto.
SECTION XIII—NO KICK-BACK CERTIFICATION
The CONSULTANT warrants that no person has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this
contract upon any agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee;
and that no member of the Board of Supervisors or any employee of the COUNTY has any interest,
financially or otherwise, in the CONSULTANT's firm.
For breach or violation of this warranty, the COUNTY shall have the right to annul this contract without
liability, or at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration, the full amount of such
commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee.
SECTION XIV—ANTI-DISCRIMINATION PROVISION
The COUNTY will endeavor to ensure in every way possible that small business enterprises shall have
every opportunity to participate in providing professional services, purchased goods, and contractual
services to the COUNTY without being discriminated against on the grounds of race, religion, gender, age,
disability, or national origin.
The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because
of race, religion, gender, age, disability, or national origin, and further agrees not to engage in any unlawful
employment practices. The CONSULTANT further agrees to insert the foregoing provisions in all
subcontracts hereunder.
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 9 of 13

SECTION XV—INDEMNIFICATION
To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
COUNTY, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials, and employees from and against all
claims, damages, losses and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney fees, court costs, expert
witness fees, and the cost of appellate proceedings, relating to, arising out of, or alleged to have resulted
from the negligent acts, errors, omissions or mistakes relating to the performance of this Contract.
CONSULTANT'S duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY, its agents, representatives,
officers, directors, officials, and employees shall arise in connection with any claim, damage, loss or
expense that is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease, death, or injury to, impairment, or destruction
of property, including loss of use resulting there from, caused by any negligent acts, errors, omissions or
mistakes in the performance of this Contract including any person for whose acts, errors, omissions or
mistakes CONSULTANT may be legally liable.
The amount and type of insurance coverage requirements set forth herein will in no way be construed as
limiting the scope of the indemnity in this paragraph. The scope of this indemnification does not extend to
the sole negligence of COUNTY.
SECTION XVI - INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
CONSULTANT, at CONSULTANT'S own expense, shall purchase and maintain the herein stipulated
minimum insurance from a company or companies duly licensed by the State of Arizona and possessing a
current A.M. Best, Inc. rating of A7. In lieu of State of Arizona licensing, the stipulated insurance may be
purchased from a company or companies, which are authorized to do business in the State of Arizona,
provided that said insurance companies meet the approval of COUNTY. The form of any insurance policies
and forms must be acceptable to COUNTY.
All insurance required herein shall be maintained in full force and effect until all work or service required to
be performed under the terms of the Contract is satisfactorily completed and formally accepted. Failure to
do so may, at the sole discretion of COUNTY, constitute a material breach of this Contract.
CONSULTANT'S insurance shall be primary insurance as respects COUNTY, and any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by COUNTY shall not contribute to it.
Any failure to comply with the claim reporting provisions of the insurance policies or any breach of an
insurance policy warranty shall not affect the COUNTY'S right to coverage afforded under the insurance
policies.
The insurance policies may provide coverage that contains deductibles or self-insured retentions. Such
deductible and/or self-insured retentions shall not be applicable with respect to the coverage provided to
COUNTY under such policies. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the deductible and/or self-
insured retention and COUNTY, at its option, may require CONSULTANT to secure payment of such
deductibles or self-insured retentions by a surety bond or an irrevocable and unconditional letter of credit.
COUNTY reserves the right to request and to receive, within 10 working days, certified copies of any or all
of the herein required insurance policies and/or endorsements. COUNTY shall not be obligated, however,
to review such policies and/or endorsements or to advise CONSULTANT of any deficiencies in such
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 10 of 13

policies and endorsements, and such receipt shall not relieve CONSULTANT from, or be deemed a waiver
of COUNTY'S right to insist on strict fulfillment of CONSULTANT'S obligations under this Contract.
The insurance policies required by this Contract, except Workers' Compensation, and Errors and
Omissions, shall name COUNTY, its agents, representatives, officers, directors, officials and employees as
Additional Insureds.
The policies required hereunder, except Workers' Compensation, and Errors and Omissions, shall contain
a waiver of transfer of rights of recovery (subrogation) against COUNTY, its agents, representatives,
officers, directors, officials and employees for any claims arising out of CONSULTANT'S work or service.
CONSULTANT is required to procure and maintain the following coverages indicated by a checkmark:
1m 1. Commercial General Liability. Commercial General Liability insurance and, if necessary,
Commercial Umbrella insurance with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 for each
occurrence, $4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate, and $4,000,000
General Aggregate Limit. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form
property damage, personal injury, products and completed operations and blanket
contractual coverage, and shall not contain any provision which would serve to limit third
party action over claims. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the CGL limiting
the scope of coverage for liability arising from explosion, collapse, or underground property
damage.
Isi 2. Automobile Liability. Commercial/Business Automobile Liability insurance and, if
unnecessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance with a combined single limit for bodily injury
and property damage of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence with respect to any of
the CONSULTANT'S owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles assigned to or used in
performance of the CONSULTANT'S work or services under this Contract.
cm 3. Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance to cover obligations
imposed by federal and state statutes having jurisdiction of CONSULTANT'S employees
engaged in the performance of the work or services under this Contract; and Employer's
Liability insurance of not less than $1,000,000 for each accident, $1,000,000 disease for
each employee, and $1,000,000 disease policy limit.
CONSULTANT waives all rights against COUNTY and its agents, officers, directors and
employees for recovery of damages to the extent these damages are covered by the
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance
obtained by CONSULTANT pursuant to this agreement.
ED 4. Errors and Omissions Insurance. Errors and Omissions insurance and, if
necessary, Commercial Umbrella insurance, which will insure and provide coverage for
errors or omissions of the CONSULTANT, with limits of no less than $2,000,000 for each
claim.
CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
Prior to commencing work or services under this Contract, CONSULTANT shall furnish COUNTY with
Certificates of Insurance in a form acceptable to COUNTY, or formal endorsements as required by the
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 11 of 13

Contract in the form provided by the COUNTY, issued by CONSULTANT'S insurer(s), as evidence that
policies providing the required coverages, conditions and limits required by this Contract are in full force
and effect. Such certificates shall identify this contract number and title.
In the event any insurance policy(ies) required by this contract is (are) written on a "claims made" basis,
coverage shall extend for two years past completion and acceptance of CONSULTANT'S work or services
and as evidenced by annual Certificates of Insurance.
If a policy does expire during the life of the Contract, a renewal certificate must be sent to COUNTY fifteen
(15) days prior to the expiration date.
CANCELLATION AND EXPIRATION NOTICE
Insurance required herein shall not expire, be canceled, or materially changed without thirty (30) days prior
written notice to COUNTY.
SECTION XVII — INFLUENCE
As prescribed in MC1-1202 of the Maricopa County Procurement Code, any effort to influence an employee
or agent to breach the Maricopa County Ethical Code of Conduct or any ethical conduct, may be grounds
for Disbarment or Suspension under MC1-902.
An attempt to influence includes, but is not limited to:
1. A Person offering or providing a gratuity, gift, tip, present, donation, money, entertainment or
educational passes or tickets, or any type valuable contribution or subsidy,;
2. That is offered or given with the intent to influence a decision, obtain a contract, garner favorable
treatment, or gain favorable consideration of any kind.
If a Person attempts to influence any employee or agent of Maricopa County, the Chief Procurement
Officer, or his designee, reserves the right to seek any remedy provided by the Maricopa County
Procurement Code, any remedy in equity or in the law, or any remedy provided by this contract.
(END OF SECTION)
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 12 of 13

In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties herein have executed this Contract.
( PE.
Printed Name
A-SS STAsoc_TE t9 ICE Meat'
Title
C8/21 (2a
Date
25-
Tax Identification Number
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA
RECOMMENDED BY CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE APPROVED
By
John B. Hauskins, P.E.
Transportation Director
By
Risk Manager
Date
LEGAL REVIEW ACCEPTED AND APPROVED
Approved as to form and within the
Powers and authority granted under the By
Laws of the State of Arizona to Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Maricopa County.
ATTEST
Deputy County Counsel Clerk of the Board
Date Date
Contract No. 2013-002 Page 13 of 13

CONSULTANT SERVICES
ATTACHMENTS
1. Maricopa County Small Business Participation Reporting
Form
2. Certificate of Performance
3. Certificate of Insurance
Contract No. 2013-002

Attachment 1
Ilitaricopa County Small Business Enterprise Program
Participation Repo Form
This pint is to he submitted with each pay application or iingOiCiL Any pay application or invoice leithont
this jbmn attached is Sklifida to701Ctial as not being a employe! pay application or invoice pursuant to
the AVMS 'pithy conensct.
Name of Prime ConsulnuroCantractur Contractlie.
Coot= Person Project No_
Street Addams Amount of this Pay Application/Invoice
City, Stage ZIP
Complete below with infoimation on die SBE fimts unlined as subconsultantidsulicantmctors for this pay
applicant' . nrmvoice_ If amok was self-petfonned and your firm, as the rime, is an SEE firm pursuant to
AILS_ 41-1001, et sea_ then you may list your fimi as the SBE firm_
Mitti Slartei
' SEE Firm Name SBE Fiim Addras
*WSW
$
$
$
$
$
$
El A mark in this box certifies that no SEE firms vrexe otda4ed as the prime, saboonsidtant or
subcontractor with ramped to this pay application/invoice.
Date:
Signature
Printed Name & Telephone Number
Contract No. 2013-002

_.....--,
ACC:PRiff DATE(MM/DDNYYY)
48.....---' CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 08/22J2013
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to :
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). Identifier
PRODUCER CONTACT
Aon Risk Services Central, Inc. NAME: PHONE
Pittsburgh PA Office (A/C. No. Est): (866) 283 -7122 FAX (A/C, No.): (800) 363 -0105
Dominion Tower, 10th Floor E-MAIL Holder
625 Liberty Avenue ADDRESS:
Pittsburgh PA 15222-3110 USA
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
INSURED INSURER A: Liberty mutual Fi re Ins Co 23035
Michael Baker Jr., Inc. INSURER B: Liberty Insurance Corporation 42404
2929 North Central Ave.
Suite 800 INSURER C: National union Fire Ins Co of Pittsburgh 19445
Phoenix Az 85012 USA INSURER D: Ll oyd's Syndicate No. 2623 AA1128623
INSURER E:
INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 570051051610 REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. Limits shown are as requested
INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSR SUBR WVD POUCY NUMBER (MM/DDIVYYY1 POLICY EFF IMM/D POUCY EYJ. UMITS
A GENERAL UABILRY TB2681004145713 06/30/2013 06/34= EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000
— X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABIUTY DAMAGETO-RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $1,000,000
—
CLAIMS-MADE I X I OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $5,000
_.
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $2,000,000
GENERAL AGGREGATE 44,000,000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPUES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $4,000,000 570051051610
7 POUCY r5---, 1 PRo- r>71 LOC
A AUTOMOBILE LJABIUTY AS2 -681-004145 - 723 06/30/2013 06/30/2014 COMBINED SINGLE umrr $1,000,000
(Ea accident)
_ :
X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY ( Per person) No
— ALL OWNED — SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED PROPERTY (Per accident) DAMAGE
— — AUTOS Certificate
C X UMBRELLA UAB X OCCUR 8E018085867 06/30/2013 06/30/2014 EACH OCCURRENCE $10,000,000
_ EXCESS LAB — CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $10,000,000
CEO I X !RETENTION 510 000
B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND wA768D004145693 06/30/2013 06/30/2014 xI wc sTATu- I IOTH-
EMPLOYERS' LABILITY YIN ADS I TORY LIMITS I I ER
ANY PROPRIETOR / PARTNER / EXECUTIVE., " N/A wc7681004145703 06/30/2013 06/30/2014 E.L EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000
° OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH) WI E.L. DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000
If DESCRIPTION yes, desaibe under OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE-POLICY UMIT $1,000,000
D E&O- PL - Pri mary Qc1302675 06/30/2013 06/30/2014 Per claim $5,000,000
Professional & Pollution Aggregate $5,000,000
SIR applies per policy terns & condi .".ions
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required)
Re: contract No. 2013-002. Maricopa County Department of Transportation, Maricopa County, their agents, representatives,
officers, directors, officials and employees are included as Additional Insured on the general liability and automobile
liability, in accordance with the policy's provisions. General liability and automobile liability evidenced herein is primary
of other sources that may be available to the additional insured. Waiver of subrogation is granted in favor of additional
insured with respects to general liability and automobile liability.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
POUCY PROVISIONS.
Maricopa County Department of AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Transportation
Contracts Branch
2901 West Durango Street ,szia
Phoenix AZ 85009-6357 USA Mizi,e5fe.„.4wo,
. C1988,2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25(2010/05) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

014201300366701.1004
Policy Number TB2-681-004145-713
issued by LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION TO THIRD PARTIES
This endorsement modifies Insurance provided under the following:
BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE PART
MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE PART
GARAGE COVERAGE PART
TRUCKERS COVERAGE PART
EXCESS AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INDEMNITY COVERAGE PART
SELF-INSURED TRUCKER EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
EXCESS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
LIQUOR LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
COMMERCIAL LIABILITY— UMBRELLA COVERAGE FORM
"I Schedule
Name of Other Person(s)/ Email Address or mailing Number Days Notice:
Organization(s): address:
Per schedule an file with the cornPanY . 30
A. If we cancel this policy for any reason other than nonpayment of premium, we vvill notify the persons or
organizations shown in the Schedule above. We will send notice to the email or mailing address listed above
at least 10 days, or the number of days Fisted above, If any, before the cancellation becomes effective. In no
event does the notice to the third party exceed the notice to the first named insured.
B. This advance notification of a pending cancellation of coverage is Intended as a courtesy only. Our failure to
provide such advance notification will not extend the policy cancellation dale nor negate cancellation of the
policy.
All other terms and conditions of this policy remain unchanged.
LIM 99010511 CO2011 Liberty Mutual Group of Companies. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with
its permission.

Policy Number: AS2-681-004145-723
Issued By: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION TO THIRD PARTIES
This endorsement modifies Insurance provided under the following:
BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE PART
MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE PART
GARAGE COVERAGE PART
TRUCKERS COVERAGE PART
EXCESS AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INDEMNITY COVERAGE PART
SELF-INSURED TRUCKER EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
EXCESS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
LIQUOR LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
Schedule
Name of Other Person(s)/ -Email Address or mailing Number
Organization(s): address: Days
Notice:
Per schedule on file with 30
the company
•
A. If we cancel this policy for any reason other than nonpayment of premium, we will notify the persons or
organizations shown in the Schedule above. We will send notice to the email or mailing address listed
above at least 10 days, or the number of days listed above, if any, before the cancellation becomes
effective. In no event does the notice to the third party exceed the notice to the first named insured.
B. This advance notification of a pending cancellation of coverage Is intended as a courtesy only, Our failure
to provide such advance notification will not extend the policy cancellation date nor negate cancellation of
the policy.
All other terms and conditions of this policy remain unchanged.
LEVI 99 01 05 It © 2011, Liberty Mutual Group of Companies. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc.
with Its permission.

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION TO THIRD PARTIES
A. If we cancel this policy for any reason other than nonpayment of premium, we will notify the persons or
organizations shown in the Schedule below. We will send notice to the email or mailing address listed below at
least 10 days, or the number of days listed below, if any, before cancellation becomes effective. In no event
does the notice to the third party exceed the notice to the first named insured.
B. This advance notification of a pending cancellation of coverage is intended as a courtesy only. Our failure to
provide such advance notification will not extend the policy cancellation date nor negate cancellation of the
policy.
Schedule
Name of Other Person(s) Email Address or mailing address: Number Days Notice:
Organization(s):
Per schedule on file with the 30
company
All other terms and conditions of this policy remain unchanged.
Issued by Liberty Insurance Corporation 21814
For attachment to Policy No. WA7-68D-004145-693 Premium $
Issued to Michael Baker Corporation
WM 90 18 06 11 © 2011, Liberty Mutual Group. All Rights Reserved. Page 1 of 1
Ed. 06/01/2011

Attachment 2
PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT OF ALL CLAIMS
ENGINEERING CONTRACTS
hereby certifies to the Maricopa County Department of Transportation
(Name of Signer)
(MCDOT) that all lawful claims for labor, rental of equipment, material used, and any other claims by MICHAEL
BAKER JR., INC., or its subconsultants in connection with the project described in MCDOT Contract No. 2013-002,
have been paid.
MICHAEL BAKER JR., INC., understands that with receipt of payment for any previously invoiced amounts, plus any
retained monies, that this is a settlement of all claims of every nature and kind against MCDOT arising out of the
performance of MCDOT's Contract No. 2013-002 relating to the material, equipment and work covered in and required
by the contract.
The undersigned hereby certifies that to his/her knowledge, no contractual disputes exist in regard to this contract and that
he/she has no knowledge of any pending or potential claims in regard to this contract.
Upon submission of this document and a separate invoice for any retained funds to MCDOT, invoice processing will be
completed within sixty (60) calendar days.
State of Arizona )
) §
County of Maricopa )
Signed this day of ,20
Siznature
Title
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of , 20
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
Contract No. 2013-002

Maricopa County Small Business Enterprise Program
Participation Reporting Form
This form is to be submitted with each pay application or invoice. Any pay application or invoice without this
form attached is subject to rejection as not being a completed pay application or invoice pursuant to the terms
of the contract.
Name of Prime Consultant/Contractor Contract No.
Contact Person Project No.
Street Address Amount of this Pay Application/Invoice
City, State ZIP
Complete below with information on the SBE firms utilized as subconsultants/subcontractors for this pay
application/invoice. If work was self-performed and your firm, as the prime, is an SBE firm pursuant to A.R.S.
§ 41-1001, et seq., then you may list your firm as the SBE firm.
SBE Firm Name SBE Firm Address Type Of Work $ Pd to SBE this
Performed Appihtv
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
El A mark in this box certifies that no SBE firms were utilized as the prime, subconsultant or
subcontractor with respect to this pay application/invoice.
Date:
Signature
Printed Name & Telephone Number
Contract No. 2013 -002

EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
SOUTHERN PARKWAY:
SALOME HIGHWAY TO STATE ROUTE 85
CONTRACT NO. 2013-002

MARICOPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SCOPE OF WORK
SOUTHERN PARKWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY
Project Number TT005
Contract No. 2013-002
Southern Parkway:
Salome Highway to State Route 85

Contents
Study Overview 3
Study Area 3
Study Purpose 3
Study Management 3
Coordination with Technical Advisory Committee 4
Study Approach and Proposed Tasks 4
1. Phase I — Parkway Study Area Planning and Evaluation 4
1.1. Development of Work Plan 4
1.2. Existing and Future Features 5
1.3. Environmental Overview 7
1.4. Drainage Overview 9
2. Phase II — Develop Candidate Alignments and Preferred Alignment 10
2.1. Development and Evaluation of Candidate Alignments 10
2.2. Detailed Preferred Alignment 10
3. Study Meetings 11
3.1. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meetings 11
3.2. Study Coordination Meetings 12
4. Stakeholder Participation and Public Involvement 12
4.1. Stakeholders 12
4.2. Public Involvement Program 13
5. Project Management, Reports, and Documentation 15
5.1. Project Management 15
5.2. Documentation 16
6. Optional Tasks 18
6.1. Special Analysis Areas (Up to three areas) 18
2

Study Overview
The Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) prepared the Interstate 10/Hassayampa Valley
Roadway Framework Study (Hassayampa Framework Study) that identified a comprehensive
roadway network to meet traffic demands for the build out of the area west of the White Tank
Mountains. This long range regional transportation study identified the need for a roadway network
consisting of freeways, parkways, and major arterial roads and introduced the Arizona Parkway.
The Arizona Parkway, by design, is an enhanced arterial roadway (with a 200 foot right of way)
which utilizes a distinct intersection treatment prohibiting left turns at major cross-street
intersections. This design improves the functionality of the parkway allowing traffic to flow more
freely than a typical urban arterial roadway. The improved functionality increases capacity while
maintaining local access and a posted speed of 45 mph. Southern Parkway is one of the parkways
recommended in the Hassayampa Framework Study.
The purpose and need for this parkway was confirmed during the MAO study process. Thus, the
primary focus of this study is right-of-way preservation by identifying opportunities and constraints
(fatal flaws) within the study area.
The scope of work for the study includes the tasks necessary to prepare a parkway feasibility report
for Southern Parkway (Salome Highway to State Route 85) that will provide Maricopa County
Department of Transportation (MCDOT), Town of Buckeye (Buckeye), area property owners,
developers, and other stakeholders with a planning tool for future growth and development that
preserves the 200-foot right-of-way required for the Arizona Parkway design. This will require
significant coordination with various governing bodies, other public agencies, development interests,
and the general public.
Study Area
The study area is approximately 11 miles long, stretching from one-half mile west of Salome
Highway to one-half mile east of SR85, and two miles wide centered on the Southern Road
aligtunent.
Study Purpose
The primary objectives of the Parkway Feasibility Study are to: (1) clearly define and assess the
study area for strategic issues identification; (2) develop and evaluate candidate alignments within
the study area; (3) recommend a preferred alignment; and (4) subsequently define the characteristics
of the preferred alignment in greater detail. This study is the first step in the development process
and is meant to aid the governing bodies in protecting a continuous parkway right-of-way corridor in
this area.
Study Management
The study will be managed by MCDOT, Transportation Planning Division. The Consultant will
perform the technical analyses as described in this scope of work. All work herein shall be
completed within 365 calendar days after notice to proceed has been issued.
3

Coordination with Technical Advisory Committee
A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will be established to guide all aspects of the study. TAC
members will be selected by their respective agencies and will apply planning and engineering
expertise to the study. The TAC will meet with the MCDOT Project Manager and Consultant, as
noted in the description of the following tasks, to participate in the scoping of the study, review
study documents, and provide relevant input. TAC members will also serve as an important
resource for data collection and in identifying additional stakeholders within their organizations or
jurisdictions. A preliminary list of stakeholders and potential TAC members is included in Section
4.1.
Study Approach and Proposed Tasks
The Consultant will provide the planning and enviromnental services necessary for the preparation
of a parkway feasibility study for Southern Parkway. This study will be conducted in two phases:
1. Phase I — Parkway Study Area Planning and Evaluation
This phase includes a team site visit, researching and gathering all existing and future study area
features, assessing and evaluating the surrounding conditions for issues identification, and
preparing constraints and base maps that will allow the Consultant to make well-founded
recommendations for possible parkway alignments within the study area (resulting in the
development of a conceptual alignments graphic). As part of this planning process the
Consultant will work closely with staff and development interests in the affected jurisdictions,
both individually and collectively, to form a broad consensus of existing and future conditions.
The Consultant and MCDOT will conduct a public open house (in this phase) at a convenient
location in the study area to present and introduce the study purpose and goals and obtain public
input on existing and future study area features.
1.1. Development of Work Plan
Product: Work Plan
The Consultant will develop a 15-20 page Work Plan that will include:
• Schedule,
• Study area boundary,
• Study purpose and objectives,
• Study process and approach used to meet objectives,
• Data collection plan,
• Identification of appropriate existing parkway design standards and guidelines,
• Stakeholder database,
• Key issues and challenges,
• Detailed study tasks,
• Criteria for the evaluation of alternatives,
• Scoping report summary, including attachment of scoping meeting summary
report provided by RE! & Associates, Inc.,
4

• Written quality assurance/quality control plan — including:
o Checklists of items to be reviewed prior to each County submittal,
o Monthly quality progress reports,
o Procedures for conducting QA/QC activities,
o Person responsible for conducting QA/QC activities,
• A summary of the public participation plan developed by MCDOT
1.2. Existing and Future Features
Product: Technical Memorandum I Existing and Future Features (including aerial maps
illustrating the base conditions/constraints)
The Consultant will collect, analyze, map, and document (including dates) existing data
relevant to the parkway feasibility study area. The Consultant shall also obtain, and utilize
as appropriate, existing information/documentation from recent/relevant studies such as:
Hassayampa Framework Study, Town of Buckeye General Plan, Area Drainage Master Plans
(ADMPs), Developer Master Plan Circulation Elements, and other recent reports/analysis to
supplement this collection effort. All information and analysis will be documented in the
Existing and Future Features Technical Memorandum I.
At a minimum, the following features will be included in this section:
1.2.1. Physical Features (natural and human made) of study area such as:
• Drainage features (floodplains, washes, rivers and alluvial fans) and structures
(channels, dikes, bridges, culverts, dams),
• Irrigation canals,
• Topography from existing sources,
• Facilities (airfields, power plants, waste water plants etc.),
• Existing and planned utilities (above/below ground) — including:
o Identification and mapping of major existing and planned utilities (including
private wells) and utility owners within the parkway,
o Identification and documentation of potential conflicts between utilities and
future parkway improvements,
• Recreation trails, parks/areas, green-up areas, and clear zones.
• Mining facilities
1.2.2. Existing Roadway Conditions — Using existing available data, the Consultant will
document the existing roadways including alignment, average daily traffic (ADT),
and right-of-way width by jurisdiction, as available.
1.2.3. Existing Access Control and Policies/Guidelines. from:
• The Town of Buckeye,
• Arizona Department of Transportation,
• Maricopa Association of Governments,
• Maricopa County.
5

1.2.4. Existing and Future Roadway Network Information within the study area, including
at a minimum:
• Future functional classification for Southern is an Arizona Parkway,
• Parkway network configurations per MAG, MCDOT, and Buckeye. MCDOT to
provide GIS data from previously completed parkway studies indicating
preferred/final alignments,
• Road improvements programmed as under design or under construction,
• Transportation networks, circulation elements, and site plans from DMPs/CMP's,
General Plans, MCDOT plans/studies, and other regional/area studies as
available,
• If applicable, traffic reports and impact studies conducted by land developers
should be reviewed, and
• Build-out traffic projections from the Hassayampa Framework Study, or the
revised projections from the MCDOT Arizona Parkway Intersection / Interchange
— Operational Analysis and Design Concepts Study, as applicable. The
Consultant will request modeling results from MCDOT, and MCDOT will work
closely with MAO through the formal request process to acquire modeling results
from their regional travel demand model and provide this information to the
Consultant. No additional traffic modeling or analysis is required.
1.2.5. Land Use, Jurisdictional Control, Ownership, and Management
Including, at a minimum:
• Property boundaries from County Assessor's maps, Town of Buckeye, and other
jurisdictional agencies,
• Existing land use and ownership including:
o Identifying, analyzing, and mapping the information on current land
ownership and land uses per the County Assessor's data within the study
area,
o Description of the existing land uses identifying the approximate percentage
of land within the study area that is in agricultural, commercial, industrial,
residential, and similar uses,
• Large cominercial or industrial enterprises and public facilities shall be identified
by name and current use,
• Existing zoning classifications and descriptions,
• Town of Buckeye and Maricopa County General Plans,
• Proposed future land uses per adopted County or local government plans,
• Potential and actual rezoning requests currently being processed by Maricopa
County or other local governmental agencies,
• Significant traffic generators or attractors,
• Jurisdictional maps,
• Zoning maps,
6

• Comprehensive list of approved Community Master Plans and subdivisions
including the identification of:
o Name of the development,
o Name of developer and contact person,
o Date of approval,
o Date of any amendments,
o Number of existing and entitled dwelling units,
o Acreage and entitled square footage for commercial and industrial
development,
o Status, and
o Approved land use and circulation maps.
1.2.6. Relevant Plans, Reports, Guidelines, Studies and Standards — Existing documents
may be available from Developers; Town of Buckeye, MAO; Arizona Game & Fish;
Maricopa County, including Maricopa County Parks and Recreation and the Flood
Control District of Maricopa County; Arizona State Land Department (ASLD); etc.
1.2.7. Existing Topography/Mapping The most current available mapping from the Flood
Control District of Maricopa County (standard 10-foot contours) and/or the Maricopa
County Assessor will be used.
1.2.8. Identification of Special Interest Areas — These may include areas where additional
right-of-way may be required for drainage improvements, large cuts/fill, major
utilities, canal crossings, existing development, freeway crossings, or areas where
reduced right-of-way may be necessary. The extent of the evaluation will focus on
preliminary identification of the special interest areas and not additional detailed
evaluation. Potential special interest areas include the crossings of the Hassayampa
River, connection to SR85, SR30 and Hassayampa Freeway.
1.3. Environmental Overview
Product: Technical Memorandum 2 — Environmental Overview
The purpose of the Environmental Overview (EO) is to describe the existing environment
within the study area and to identify any documented potential problem areas (fatal flaws) that
may be attributed to transportation improvements or potential issues that impact candidate
alternative alignment development or selection. This analysis will address all of the major
environmental disciplines and a review of all appropriate resources. Data obtained and
evaluated under this task will be used in both Phases of this study and the dates of all reports
used shall be documented. Some of this information will be gathered early in the study to
assist Technical Memorandum 1 as needed.
The Consultant will perform the following tasks and provide the appropriate
documentation in the EO:
1.3.1. Cultural Resources
• Records review from the Arizona State Museum, State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO), AZSITE, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) general land
office (GLO) maps and other databases or resources for known historic and
archaeological resources present in the study area — a bibliography of resources
will be developed, including dates of documents,
7

• No consultation or Class I Inventory Report will be prepared, and
• A windshield field review may occur.
1.3.2. Biology
• Conduct a records review and consultation with appropriate federal and state
agencies of the study area to determine the potential for encountering threatened,
endangered, or proposed endangered species and designated critical habitats for
federal, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and BLM, and state,
Arizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD), listed species, and to gain
information about the physical environment, including plant communities, native
plant occurrences, topography, and sensitive species habitat;
• Identify wildlife crossing corridors and linkages; and
• A windshield field review may occur.
1.3.3. Land Use/Socioeconomic/Visual Quality
• Collect the best available data and research the land use, socioeconomic, and
visual quality for the study area, including population, employment, prime or
unique agricultural farm land, and other socioeconomic characteristics, and
• Review potential Section 4(0 of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act 1966,
BLM, and Section 6(0 of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act resources
identified in existing databases.
1.3.4. Water Qualify
• Coordinate with Arizona Department of Water Resources to identify known well
sites within the study area,
• Research and identify any water quality issues for the study, including
identification of potential jurisdictional waters (JDs) and permit needs,
• A jurisdictional delineation will not be completed, and
• Make reasonable effort to obtain documents available from previously approved
JDs and Section 404/401 permitting through developer actions,
1.3.5. Hazardous Materials
• Obtain a regulatory database report to determine the potential for hazardous
materials that may adversely affect the study area,
• Conduct a database search of existing regulated hazardous material sites and solid
waste facilities located within or in the vicinity of the study area, and
• A windshield field review may occur.
1.3.6. Noise Impacts
• Preliminary qualitative evaluation of potential noise impacts/potential receptors,
and
• No measurement or modeling will be conducted.
8

1.3.7. Air Quality
• Preliminary evaluation for compliance with national standards, including Mobile
Source Air Toxics (MSATS) and impacts to regional areas air quality conformity,
and
• No measurement or modeling will be conducted.
1.3.8. Docuntentation
• Develop an enviromnental constraints map,
• Format the EO as a separate document for easy future reference, and
• The EO will be notated to clearly state that it reports and summarizes existing
documents and dates, to the extent they are available, and that new studies were
not conducted.
1.4. Drainage Overview
Product: Technical Memorandum 3— Drainage Overview
The Consultant will prepare a Drainage Overview Technical Memorandum for the study
area using existing available studies and data from Flood Control District of Maricopa
County (FCDMC), ASLD, Town of Buckeye, MCDOT, Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT), Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR), Central
Arizona Project (CAP) and developers, as well as limited field review and existing
mapping and hydrology/hydraulics. Data obtained and evaluations conducted under this
task will be used in both Phases of this study. The Consultant will:
• Obtain and Review Existing Reports including:
o FCDMC Area Drainage Master Studies (ADMS) and Area Drainage Master
Plans (ADMP) that address drainage conditions along the parkway,
o Research, identify, and summarize other relevant information from Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), FCDMC, and municipalities,
o ADWR groundwater level mapping (most current mapping), including known
fissures,
o Regional context flood and geomorphic hazard maps based on existing
floodplain reports and geologic mapping within and adjacent to study area.
o Information related to previous analyses and plans completed on sand and
gravel impact to the Hassayampa River.
• Determine the existing off-site concentration points and flow magnitudes for the
100-year storm event using existing data and studies (the determination will be
based on simple area/graphic interpolations),
• Each drainage way identified and considered shall be documented and identified
graphically showing the location of the flow concentration points and the
corresponding and 100 year magnitudes, and
• Contact appropriate personnel, including one-on-one meetings if required, from
MCDOT, FCDMC, Town of Buckeye, ADWR and Arizona Geological Survey to
discuss past drainage problems, subsidence and fissure areas.
9

2. Phase H — Develop Candidate Alignments and Preferred Alignment
In this phase, based on the issues and constraints identified in Phase 1, the Consultant will develop
and perform a "fatal flaw" analysis of conceptual alternatives and identify up to three candidate
alignments for a more detailed evaluation. Layout of the candidate alignments will be based on a
minimum parkway right-of-way width of 200 feet, Right-of-way requirements associated with
parkway-to-parkway and parkway-to-freeway interchanges will also be identified based on the latest
design guidelines developed by MCDOT and ADOT.
The Consultant will identify a framework of evaluation criteria that will be presented to the TAC for
review. Using the framework, the Consultant will prepare an alternatives evaluation matrix. Based
upon the evaluation, the Consultant will recommend a preferred alignment to be carried forward for
further refinement. The Consultant and MCDOT will jointly conduct two Public Open Houses (in
this Phase) at a convenient location in the study area to present the development and evaluation of
candidate alignments and preferred alignment recommendations.
2.1. Development and Evaluation of Candidate Alignments
Product: Technical Memorandum 4— Candidate Alignments and Evaluation
The Consultant will identify a series of conceptual alternatives and perform a "fatal flaw"
analyses on the conceptual alternatives to produce up to three candidate alternatives to be
evaluated in greater detail. The evaluation of up to three candidate alternatives, along
with a "no-build" alternative, will address engineering feasibility, regional connectivity,
environmental compatibility, compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
community concerns, and order of magnitude cost estimates. The development and
evaluation of candidate alignments will include the following:
2.1.1. Schematic Drawings - For each of the candidate aligmnents, the Consultant will
provide schematic drawings of the plan view (1" = 1,000' scale) of the alignment
superimposed on aerial photography and printed on 11" x 17" paper. The drawings
will include proposed right-of-way centerlines and envelopes.
2.1.2. Preliminary Cost Estintates - Planning-level order-of-magnitude cost estimates will
be developed for each of the candidate alternatives based only on full build-out. The
County will provide typical cost items and unit costs.
2.1.3. Evaluation of Candidate Alignments - The Consultant will document the evaluation
of up to three candidate alignments in Technical Memorandum #4. One of the three
alternatives will reflect previously approved circulation plans. The analysis will
include a matrix documenting the various evaluation factors used in determining the
preferred alignment, including information obtained through public outreach.
2.2. Detailed Preferred Alignment
Product: Technical Memorandum 5 — Preferred Alignment
Append& A — Preferred Alignment Drawings
The Consultant will document, in detail, all information that has been gathered and
evaluated in association with the preferred alignment hi Technical Memorandum 4 and will
recommend next steps in the study process. Design features considered during the
development and refinement (impact mitigation/alignment optimization) of the preferred
alignment will be documented and depicted on the preferred alignment drawings. At a
minimum, the drawings will include:
10

• Standard cross section,
• Plan view with parkway study centerline and existing and proposed right-of-way
lines shown on an aerial base map (1" = 200' scale unless otherwise directed) and
printed on 11" x 17" paper,
• Potential areas requiring additional right-of-way (profile changes, parkway-to
parkway interchanges, parkway-to-freeway interchanges, roadway embankments,
new drainage crossings, and realigned washes), and
• Drainage crossings for three size categories (i.e., small, medium,large/bridge) for
the potential structures needed to accommodate projected 100-year flows.
3. Study Meetings
3.1. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meetings
The Consultant (typically the Consultant Project Manager plus up to three members of the
consulting team) will participate in up to five (5) meetings with the TAC. These meetings
will address:
• Study initiation,
• Results of the data collection, assessment and evaluation of the parkway
conditions to be used for issues identification and conceptual alignment
brainstorming,
• Alignment evaluation framework criteria and performance measures,
• Identification of conceptual alignments (minimum two weeks prior to the Public
Open House #1).
• Evaluation and analysis of candidate alignments (minimum two weeks prior to
Public Open House #2),
• Recommendation of the preferred alignment (minimum two weeks prior to the
Public Open House #3),
• The Consultant will:
o Prepare and maintain the TAC database,
o Prepare and distribute meeting invitations, agendas, sign-in sheets, handout
materials, PowerPoint presentations (if applicable), and graphics/displays,
o Meet with the MCDOT Project Manager, in person or by phone call, two
weeks before each TAC meeting (these will also serve as study progress
meetings),
o Conduct and attend the TAC meetings,
o Prepare meeting summaries including documentation of decisions reached
and task assignments,
• MCDOT will organize the committee, schedule meetings, participate in meetings,
and communicate with the TAC as deemed appropriate by the MCDOT Project
Manager.
11

3.2. Study Coordination Meetings
The Consultant will be responsible for up to ten (10) meetings with agencies, principal land
developers, private property owners, and utility companies. These meetings will be
conducted on an individual and/or group basis, as appropriate and as identified in
Subsection 4.1 and will typically include the MCDOT Project Manager and up to two
Consultant representatives.
4. Stakeholder Participation and Public Involvement
Product: Technical Memorandum 6— Public and Stakeholder Participation
4.1. Stakeholders
The MCDOT Project Manager and the Consultant will meet with appropriate stakeholders
to identify concerns, discuss relevant issues, gather input, and build consensus. Meetings
with these stakeholders will be conducted on an individual and/or group basis, as
appropriate. A preliminary list of stakeholders and potential TAC members may include,
but will not necessarily be limited to, representatives of the following organizations:
• Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT)
• Arizona State Land Department (ASLD)
• Arizona Game and Fish Department
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
• Flood Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC)
• Town of Gila Bend
• Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG)
• Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)
o Traffic
o Right-of-way
o Development Services
o Utilities
o Engineering
o Public Information
o Environmental
o Cultural Resources
o Emergency Management
• Maricopa County Environmental Services
• Maricopa County Planning and Development
• Maricopa County Parks and Recreation
• Maricopa County Supervisor — District 4
• Town of Buckeye
• School District Representatives
• United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
12

• Maricopa County Farm Bureau
• Fire District Representatives
• Major Utility Providers
o SRP
o WAF'A
o Transwestem
o APS
• Private Utilities
o Water Companies
o Irrigation Districts
• Land Developments
• Private property owners and residents
• Area Businesses
• Community Groups
• Media
4.2. Public Involvement Program
As part of the comprehensive overall MCDOT RightRoads Program for public outreach the
MCDOT Community Relations Branch has primary responsibility for all MCDOT public
outreach efforts. However, Consultant involvement is crucial in the development and
implementation of a comprehensive study specific outreach program for this study.
Program components will include strategies and specific approaches intended to involve and
inform the public throughout the study process. It is anticipated that an iterative Public
Involvement Process will be implemented in order to address community needs and
objectives. Interactive public involvement meetings along with other public involvement
methods may be used to gather public input and help facilitate public communication and
education efforts throughout the study.
A tentative schedule of public meetings and an assignment of responsibilities for both
MCDOT and consulting staff shall also be prepared. The Consultant will contribute to this
effort by participating with MCDOT staff in a preparation meeting prior to the each of the
Public Open House meetings.
In general, MCDOT Community Relations staff will be responsible for:
• Producing materials such as display boards, advertisements, handouts, and
questionnaires for public meetings, based on technical and/or graphical
information provided by the Consultant,
• Scheduling and conducting public meetings and Public Open Houses,
• Contracting for meeting locations,
• Developing and mailing meeting notices,
• Placing newspaper ads,
• Preparing press releases, and
13

• MCDOT Community Relations staff will prepare a detailed "Summary of Public
Involvement" report that includes public and stakeholder comments collected at
all public meetings, stakeholder meetings, and special purpose meetings and
MCDOT responses. The Consultant will use this information to prepare Technical
Memorandum 6 — Public and Stakeholder Participation,
In general the Consultant will be responsible for:
• Participating in the Public Open Houses (Project Manager and up to three
Consultant team staff members) and
o Participation in a pre-submittal briefing by phone, e-mail, or in person with
the MCDOT Community Relations staff 21 calendar days before each Public
Open House to discuss the necessary information that the Consultant will need
to provide to MCDOT,
o Providing all requested electronic data to the MCDOT Community Relations
staff 14 calendar days prior to the Public Open House, unless otherwise
directed by the MCDOT Project Manager,
• Providing technical information to the MCDOT Conununity Relations staff for
use in display boards, roll plots, advertisements, handouts, questionnaires, and
presentations,
• Preparing renderings and detailed drawings to visually assist stakeholders to make
informed decisions,
• Participating in and answering technical questions at all Public Open Houses,
• Identifying and maintaining a list of current contact information for stakeholders
(public agencies, developers, etc.),
• Providing public meeting comment summaries to the MCDOT Community
Relations staff for inclusion in the final public participation report prepared by the
MCDOT Community Relations Branch, and
• Summarizing the public involvement effort for inclusion in the Final Report as
Technical Memorandum 6—Public and Stakeholder Participation.
4.2.1 Public Open House #1 —Introduction and Data Collection
Note —MCDOT Community Relations Staff has prima)) , responsibility for this task
Public Open House #1 will be held to inform the public of the objectives of the study,
introduce the Arizona Parkway concept, provide available base and constraints
mapping, and provide area residents and other impacted stakeholders with an
opportunity to inform study team members about the study area, issues and local
transportation needs. This meeting will also provide study team members an •
opportunity to discuss and elicit feedback about the study purpose, goals and
objectives.
The following initial study data will be presented:
• Study Location,
• Study Schedule,
• Study Background (Context),
• Study Purpose/Need,
14

• Study Goals/Objectives,
• Preliminary Study Issues and Challenges,
• Study Stakeholders,
• Study Process/Approach,
• Existing & Future Condition Information,
• Hassayampa Framework Study Graphic, and
• Conceptual Alignment Alternatives.
4.2.2 Public Open House #2— Evaluation of Candidate Alignment Alternatives
Note —MCDOT Community Relations Staff has primary responsibility for this task
Open House #2 will be held to inform the public of progress made in the study, provide
all base and constraints mapping, review the Arizona Parkway concept, review
alignment evaluation criteria, present the candidate alignments, answer questions, and
gather input that will assist in the further development and evaluation of the alignments
and the selection of the preferred alignment.
The following updated study data shall be reviewed or presented:
• Study Location,
• Study Schedule,
• Study Background (Context),
• Study Purpose/Need,
• Study Goals/Objectives,
• Preliminary Study Issues and Challenges,
• Study Stakeholders,
• Study Process/Approach,
• Environmental Overview,
• Drainage Overview,
• Hassayampa Framework Study Graphic
• Alignment Evaluation Criteria, and
• Candidate Alignment Alternatives,
4.2.3 Public Open House #3 — Preferred Alignment
Note —MCDOT Community Relations Staff has primary responsibiliO) for this task
Open House #3 will be held to inform the public of progress made in the study, present
results of the candidate alignment evaluation process, present the preferred alignment,
answer questions, and gather input for use in the development of the final report.
5. Project Management, Reports, and Documentation
5,1. Project Management
Product — Progress Reports, Study Schedule, and Monthly Invoices
The Consultant will be responsible for providing project administration and management
services in accordance with the general requirements for this study. The Consultant will
15

set up and maintain a File Transfer Protocol (ftp) site for study file transfers between the
study team members.
Monthly Reports/Invoices — The Consultant will provide monthly progress reports,
submit monthly invoices with Earned Value graphs, and provide oversight to ensure all
deliverables are in compliance with this Scope of Work.
Study Schedule — The Consultant shall prepare, submit, and maintain an updated study
work schedule in Gantt Chart (bar chart) form. The schedule shall identify key meeting,
delivery, and review times. Each review time shall be shown as 21 days unless otherwise
advised by the MCDOT Project Manager. The Consultant shall update the study schedule
as necessary for it to accurately represent study progress and to realistically forecast
scheduled submittals.
5.2. Documentation
Study Products — See below
5.2.1 Technical Memoranda
All reports and memoranda will include standard report covers developed by the
Consultant and will be consistent for all documents. Draft technical memoranda will
be provided in pdf format for review on the study ftp site. A Word Document, digital
version, will be provided to the MCDOT Project Manager. The Consultant shall
prepare and submit the following Draft and Final Technical Memoranda and meeting
documentation:
• Work Plan
• Technical Memorandum 1 — Existing and Future Features,
• Technical Memorandum 2 — Environmental Overview,
• Technical Memorandum 3 —Drainage Overview,
• Technical Memorandum 4— Candidate Alignments and Evaluation,
• Technical Memorandum 5 — Preferred Alignment,
• Technical Memorandum 6— Public and Stakeholder Participation, and
• Summary of field reviews/meetings.
The Consultant will submit Technical Memoranda in the following manner:
• Draft Technical Memoranda: Upload to the ftp site, and
• Final Technical Memoranda: Upload to ftp site.
5.2.2 Draft Final and Final Report Format
The Consultant will prepare the parkway Draft and Final Reports in general
conformance with the following outline:
• Title Page,
• Table of Contents,
• List of Figures,
• List of Tables,
• Executive Summary
16

o Study purpose,
o Brief description of alignment alternatives, including the preferred
alignment evaluation matrix,
o Brief description of the preferred alignment, planning level estimated costs,
next steps for implementation of study recommendations, and general access
management guidelines if applicable,
o Map(s) depicting the candidate alignment alternatives and the preferred
alignment,
o Considerations for Future Development,
• Existing and future features, including:
o Parkway Characteristics (natural/man-made),
o Roadway Features,
o Transportation Network/Travel Demand,
o Utilities /Constraints mapping,
o Land Use, Ownership and Management,
o Environmental summary,
o Drainage summary,
o Special Analysis Areas,
o Relevant Plans/Reports and Guidelines,
• Development and Evaluation of Candidate Aligtunents
o Candidate Alignments and Evaluation Matrix,
o Alignment Schematic Drawings,
o Conclusions and Recommendations.
• Preferred Alignment
o Standard cross-section,
o Design Features,
o General Access management guidelines if applicable,
o Planning-level cost estimates,
o Next Steps for Implementation of Study Recommendations,
o Preferred Alignment Drawings,
o Right-of-way needs, and
o Public Involvement Overview (provided by mcmorn.
Appendices
The following will be included as appendices of the fmal report:
• Technical Memorandum 1 — Existing and Future Features
• Technical Memorandum 2 — Environmental Overview
• Technical Memorandum 3 — Drainage Overview
• Technical Memorandum 4 — Candidate Alignments and Evaluation
• Technical Memorandum 5 — Preferred Alignment
• Technical Memorandum 6 — Public and Stakeholder Participation
17

• Summary of field reviews/meetings
The Consultant will submit the Final Report in the following manner:
• Draft Final Report: Upload to ftp site
• Final Report and Appendices: Five copies, spiral bound, and 15 CD-ROMs with
final report and appendices.
Note: The entire report - including text, photos, drawings, tables, maps, appendices and
hand —calculations — shall be provided to MCDOT in word format as available and as
one Acrobat Reader (.PDF) formatted file on a compact disk or DVD, suitable for
publishing on the MCDOT website. The Consultant will prepare and consolidate
study-related data obtained or collected during the course of the study in GIS layers; the
Preferred Alternative shape file shall be labeled "Preferred Alternative". Additionally,
plans will be prepared in MicroStation (V8) format and be re-submitted separately from
the entire report on a second compact disk or DVD. Digital photographs shall be
provided to MCDOT in electronic format. Electronic files shall be submitted on
compact disk or DVD.
6. Optional Tasks
6.1. Special Analysis Areas (Up to three areas)
Candidate Alternatives may require options for detailing special analysis areas such as
future parkway-to-parkway and parkway-to-freeway connections, drainage crossings, or
environmentally sensitive areas. These options will identify issues, alternatives, potential
benefits, and any potential fatal flaws. The specific scope and effort required for each
special analysis are will be determined in consultation with the MCDOT Project Manager.
18

EXHIBIT B
CONSULTANT'S FEE SCHEDULE
SOUTHERN PARKWAY:
SALOME HIGHWAY TO STATE ROUTE 85
CONTRACT NO. 2013-002

FEE PROPOSAL - TABLE A
CONSULTANT
COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
CONSULTANT: Michael Baker Jr.. Inc. CONTRACT NO.: 2013-002
PROJECT NAME: Southern Parkway Feasibility Study: Salome Highway to State Route 85
DIRECT LABOR
Classifications Man-hours Hourly Rates Labor Costs
Principal 26 $68.02 $1,768.52
Project Manager 344 $64.93 $22,335.92
Transportation Planner 615 $38.41 $23,622.15
Transportation Engineer III 240 $41.32 $9,916.80
Transportation Engineer II 175 $37.43 $6,550.25
Transportation Engineer I 110 $33.62 $3,698.20
Drainage Engineer 302 $50.52 $15,257.04
Utility Engineer 33 $67.84 $2,238.72
GIS Specialist 135 $46.02 $6,212.70
Sr. Public Involvement Coord 103 $65.50 $6,746.50
CAD Technician 46 $28.07 $1,291.22
Administrative Assistant 10 $29.65 $296.50
Consultant's Subtotal Direct Labor $ 99,934.52
Consultant's Overhead @ 167,12% of Direct Labor $ 167,010.57
Consultant's Profit @ 10% of Direct Labor + Overhead $ 26.69431
Consultant's Total Direct Labor $ 293439.60
DIRECT AND OUTSIDE EXPENSES
DESCRIPTION EXPENSE AMOUNT
Color Prints (8.5x11 & 1 lx17) @ $0.5 x 7820 $ 3,910.00
BAV Prints (8.5x11) (ii) $0.05 x 200 $ 10.00
Color Cardstock (8.5x11) @ $1.75 x 20 $ 35.00
Machine Folding @ $0.13 x 1300 $ 169.00
Binding @ $3.00 x 58 $ 174.00
Color Plotting ("(stl 8 1.95 sfx 180 sf $ 351.00
CD @ $6.00 x 18 $ 108.00
Field Visit (1) (ii), $0.565 x 110 Mi $ 62.15
Open House - Palo Verde ES (3) @ 80.565 x 318 Mi $ 179.67
TAC Meeting -MCDOT (5) @80.565 x 70 Mi $ 31.64
Study Coordination Meetings (10) @80.565 x 200 Mi $ 113.00
Sharepoint File Transfer Site $ 240.00
Courier $ 100.00
Consultant's Total Direct and Outside Expenses $ 5,483.46
Cost Proposal Summary (Optional Tasks) Page 1 of 3
Maricopa County Department of Transportation

FEE PROPOSAL - TABLE A
CONSULTANT
COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
SUB CONSULTANT(s)
NAME OF SUBCONSULTANT TASK TOTAL COST
EcoPlan Associates, Inc. TM 2— Environmental Overview $ 19,000.18
Total Subconsultant(s) $ 19,000.18
Consultant's Total Direct Labor $ 293,639.60
Consultant's Total Direct and Outside Expenses $ 5.483.46
Total; $ 318,123.24
Consultant's Totals of Direct Labor and
Direct and Outside Expenses $ 318 123 24
OPTIONAL TASK ALLOWANCES
TASK ESTIMATED COST
Special Analysis Areas (3): $24,918.13
Hassayampa Freeway, Hassayampa River, Stale Rou1e 85
Michael Baker Jr., Inc. TOTAL PROPOSED FEE $343,041.37
(Inclusive of Consultant and Subconsultant[s] total proposed fee.)
Fitith
Signature
Assistant Vice-President
Title
July 23, 2013
Date
Cost Proposal Summary (Optional Tasks) Page 2 of 3
Maricopa County Department of Transportation

FEE PROPOSAL - TABLE A
SUBCONSULTANT
COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
SUBCONSULTANT: EcoPlan Associates, Inc. CONTRACT NO.: 2013-002
PROJECT NAME: Southern Parkway Feasibility Study
DIRECT LABOR
Classifications Man-hours Hourly Rates Labor Costs
Principal 4 $ 62.00 $248.00
Senior Environmental Manager 40 $ 46.50 $1,860.00
Environmental Planner I 60 $ 25.50 $1,530.00
Senior Biologist 6 $ 37.50 $225.00
Biologist III 30 $ 28.25 $847.50
Cultural Principal Investigator 4 $ 53.50 $214.00
Cultural Resource Specialist III 18 $ 34.63 $623.34
Quality Control Specialist/Editor III 20 $ 38.00 $760.00
GIS Graphics Specialist II 20 $ 29.50 $590.00
Secretary/Clerical 20 $ 16.00 $320.00
Subconsultant's Subtotal Direct Labor $ 7217.84
Subconsultant's Overhead @ 117.33 % of Direct Labor $ 8,468.69
Subconsultant's Profit @ 10 % of Direct Labor + Overhead $ 1,568,65
Subconsultant's Total Direct Labor $ 17255.18
DIRECT AND OUTSIDE EXPENSES
- DESCRIPTION EXPENSE AMOUNT
Mileage (100 miles @ $0.55/mile) $ 55.00
Reproduction $ 100.00
Regulatory Database Report (Allands) $ 750.00
ASM Site Review Fee (24 square miles (0, $35/square mile) $ 840.00
Subconsultant's Total of Direct and Outside Expenses $ 1345.00
Subconsultant's Total Direct Labor $ 17,255.18
SUBCONSULTANT'S TOTAL PROPOSED FEE $ 19,000.18
Signature
President
Title
July 12, 2013
Date
Cost Proposal Summary (Optional Tasks) Page 3 of 3
Maricopa County Department of Transportation

ManHrs
26 344 615 240 175 110 302 33 135 103 46 10 2139 1
of Proj
TOTALS 1 Sch
-
Page B
1 35 50 15 10 15 10 4 2 141
2013-002 SEP Templates‘Table
I 5 30 74 24 17 5 10 4 1691
AUG
Contract
NO: 1
4 36 77 24 9 9 19 4 12 15 6 2 2171
JUL
CONTRACT 1 33 56 18 13 13 21 9 17 3 1831
85 JUN
Route I 15 24, 7 13 13 9 9 3 , 931
MAY
MAN-HOURS
State
B 1 8 30 49_ 25 24 18 23 4 15 12 4 2 2141
to APR
MAN-HOURS
ATED 3 ,
Highway 25 44 20 19 13 17 12 153
MAR
Inc. ESTI 1 25 36 18 19 13 45 12 8 1761
PROPOSAL-TABLE Salome FEB
CONSULTANT/SUBCONSULTANT PROJECT Jr.,
1 3 35 67 29 26 7- 45 8 17 19 5 2 2631
Baker JAN
Study:
1 3 25 44 19 26 7 34 8 17 13 5 2011
Michael DEC
FEE SCHEDULED Feasibility 1 ,
3 21 40 19 26 7 34 8 17 13 5 193
NOV
-1
Parkway 24 40 12 13 2 91]
OCT
NAME: 1 10 14 10 10 1 451
Southern
SEP
M 1
III ll I Coord Transportation
Planner Engineer Engineer Engineer Assistant
of
CONSULTANT/SUBCONSULTANT 2013 PERSONNEL Involvement
Engineer TOTAL
NAME: 23. Manager Department
Engineer Technician
July Specialist
MAN-HOURS Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Public Administrative
PROJECT PROJECT Principal Drainage County
DATE: Project Utility CAD
GIS Sr.
, _ Maricopa

ManHrs
4 ao o 60 6 30 4 18 20 0 20 20 222 Pro]
TOTALS o 1 Sch
2013-002 -
age B
1 2 4 61
AUG Templates\Table
NO: 1 2 21
JUL
CONTRACT 1 1 Contract
JUN
2014) 4 6 1 4 2 17
- MAY
(2013 1 1
APR
B 1
MAN-HOURS MAN-HOURS MAR!
TABLE Inc. 1 1
FEB
- Associates, 1 2 2 6 4 6 6 261
CONSULTANT/SUBCONSULTANT PROJECT ESTIMATED JAN
PROPOSAL Study 1 10 14 6 15 3 6 12 12 781
EcoPlan DEC
Feasibility 10 14 15 391
SCHEDULED NOV
FEE
1 6 20 12 4 421
Parkway OCT
NAME I 2 4 6 121
Southern 7/12/2013 SEPT
I 1
Mgr. III I Investigator 111 III Mansportation
Spec. III
CONSULTANT/SUBCONSULTANT PERSONNEL Planner Planner Spec. of
NAME: Environmental ControVEditor Control/Editor TOTAL
Biologist Principal Resource Department
III Graphics Secretary/Clefical
MAN-HOURS Environmental Environmental
PROJECT DATE: PROJECT Principal Senior Senior Biologist Cultural Cultural Quality Quality County
GIS
Maricopa

=.53343 519.735.58 5526.72 87,293.34 516,206.80 511,797.14 S6,164.70 51,198.61 31.08.26 36.47340 $3.634.50 312.962.09 34.730.20 52.02165 52,716.10 58.430.40 OF! 1 Labor
TOTAL LABOR Otroct
PAGE His
55 422 16 152 363 271 1= 21 34 140 70 276 95 47 50 Mon
Est
TOTAL MAN-HOURS C
2013-002 \Tab%
2 2 2 2 2
No.: trntive Templates
Assistant 52945/1(R
Contract Adminis' Contracts
18 10 10 8 s
CAD Technician 325.07/11it
, 38 5 $ 20 10 20 5
Palk Involvement Coon! 365.50/HR
Sr.
50 35 30 10 10 10
Specialist
546.412/11R
CIS
25 4 4 8
Utility Ese1neer 567.114/HR
LABOR
8 s 118 40 28 20 1 s 20 10 26 10 5 40
DIRECT Drainoge gets/swer MAR
SSD
C AND 20 ao 40 .. 10 10
CONSULTANT/SUBCONSULTANT I
TABLE
MAN-HOURS Transportation Eneneer $3342/HR
CLASSIFICATIONS
77 se 40
II
ESTIMATED 85 LABOR Transportation &tenter .431HR
Route $37
State DIRECT 8 50 as 20 20 1 s 20 10 40 10 5 ao
to HI
Transportadon Engineer 541.32/HR
Inc. Hichwav
Jr.. ,
Salome 25 103 s 8 78 60 36 5 to 70 20 120 40 10 20 40
Baker
Study: Transportation Planner 3311.11VHR
Michael
Feasibility 12 40 8 8 40 28 24 4 8 30 30 47 30 5 30 20
Project Manager 564.93/BR
Parkway 9 e 4 5 6
NAME: Principal 56&07JIIR
Southern
_ 7numportanon
et
TASK/PRASE I Features IT Involvement Mead:nes Management Tasks (3) Department
CONSULTANT/SUBEONSULTANT NAME: 23,2013 Phase Ovorview nate Meetktes Doeuenentation Areas
Future lil li2 Drainage, 43 Alignments 44 Aligmnent ti5 Public Stakeholder 46 Coordination Report Activities Study Mangano% Optional County
July COISTRACT Plan and Memo Environmental Memo Memo Memo Memo Meetings & Memo Review Meeting:I Final Report Out Analysis
PROJECT DATE: Went Existing Tech Tech Conceptual Tech Candidate Tech Preferred Tech Public Public Tech Field TAC Study Draft Final Close Study Special madcap.

I
OF
TOTAL 5955.34 .=.00 5530.00 531340 $256.50 59730 $156.50 52.15340 5282.00 186.00 5372.00 $687.00 $7,217.54 I
LABOR
SI $ PAGE
_
TOTAL MAN-HOURS 26 40 20 10 9 3 5 68 8 4 8 21 222
2013-002
No.: -
AIR
0 o 4 0 2 0 0 4 o o 0 10 20
Contract soovtorr 06.00
0 MR
Omphics sr.:dorm 4 3 4 4 1 a 2 2 o o o 0
S29.50
GB
Conroi adhor /HR
/ m 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 20 o o o 0 20
(tadlsy Specbast $38.00
,
Ramos m MR
18 o o o 0 o 0 0 o o o 0 18
Soedalin S34.63
Caltoall
,
LABOR
Plinelpat /HR
Immolator 4 o o 0 0 o 0 0 o o o 0 4
LUNT
DIRECT Oikosel $.50
C BCONSU AND
m /HR
o 30 o 0 0 o 0 0 o o o 0 30
TABLE Blelosla $25.25
MAN-HOURS
CLASSEFICATCONS _
CONSULTANT/SU
Ilidosist /HR
a 6 0 0 0 o 0 0 a o a 0 6
S37-50
ESTIMATED Sedix
LABOR
/RR
EDviroarnental Humeri 0 0 10 4 4 2 2 34 4 o o 0 60
DIRECT $25.50
Study
/HR
Inc. Feasibility Sealer larvinamodal Manner 0 o 2 2 2 I I 6 4 4 tt 10
346-50
Associates, Parkway
711512013 /RR
PriocINI 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 o 1 4
EcoPlan Southern $62.00
NAME:
Meetings
Committee Program
TASK/PHASE. Overview Alernathes Mernatives
Overview Use/Socioeconomic/Visual Committee
Materials
Resources or or Advisory Involvanent Management Management
Quality Impacts Involvement
CONSULTANT/SUBCONSOLTANT Quality Environmental Advisory
NAME: CONTRACT Environmental Cultural Biology Hazardous Development Development
Land Water Noise Air Technical Public Project Project
PubBe
13.1 13.2 133 13.4 13.5 13.6 137 1.18 Documentation 2.1 Technical 4.2 5.1
13 2.1 3.1 4.2 5.1
PROJECT DATE: Task Task Task Quality Task Task Task Task Task Task Meetings 3.1 Task Task
Task Task Task Task Tab*